alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

I, Harvey Beker, Co-Chief Executive Officer of Millburn RidgefieldCorporation, the Managing Owner of The Millburn World Resource Trust (the “Trust”),do hereby certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this annualreport on Form 10-K of The Millburn World Resource Trust ;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, thisannual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this annualreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Trust as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report;

 

4. The Trust’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Trust and have:

 

  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Trust,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;

 

  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Trust’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

 

  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Trust’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Trust’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Trust’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of thisannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5.  The Trust’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the Trust’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Trust’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Trust’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the Trust’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
| By: /s/ Harvey Beker       |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
|                       |
|                       |
| Harvey Beker               |
| Co-Chief Executive Officer |
| March 30, 2006             |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 22-0213 

TODD MARTIN RUDE, 

Petitioner and Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Respondent and Appellee. 

ORDER 

In a May 10, 2022 Order, this Court granted self-represented Appellant Todd Martin 

Rude's Petition for an Out-of-Time Appeal. Rude now moves for appointment of counsel 

and for an extension of time to file his opening brief. 

Rude is not entitled to an appointment of counsel in this appeal. Rude appeals a 

March 1, 2022 Order on Petition for Postconviction Relief, where the Lewis and Clark 

County District Court denied his petition. There is no right to the appointment of counsel 

in a postconviction proceeding for relief, although a court may order the assignment of 

counsel under the circumstances outlined in § 46-8-104, MCA. While Rude references his 

three mental health diagnoses, those circumstances are not the criteria under Montana's 

statute. Furthermore, Rude represented himself in the District Court. Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that Rude's Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Rude's Motion for Extension of Time is 

GRANTED and that Rude shall prepare, file, and serve his opening brief on or before 

September 20, 2022. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record and to 

Todd Martin Rude along with a copy of this Court's Civil Appellate Handbook. 

DATED this day of July, 2022. 

For the Court, 

Chief Justice 

07/11/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0213
EXHIBIT 32




Certification
Pursuant To


18 U.S.C.
Section 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant To


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
(the “Report”) of Epic Energy Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter
ended June 30, 2009, each of the undersigned: John S. Ippolito, the Chief
Executive Officer of the Company and Michael Kinney, theChief Financial Officer of the Company,herby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of the undersigneds’ knowledge and belief:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: August 6, 2009
                        /s/-John
      S. IppolitoJohn S. Ippolito,Chief Executive
      Officerand
                          Principal Executive
  OfficerDated: August 6, 2009
                        /s/
      Michael KinneyMichael Kinney,Chief  Financial
      Officer and
                          Principal
      Accounting
Officer
# 2018 Supplier Conference 

/ Published Jan. 3, 2018
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 

## DLA Land and Maritime Supplier Conference and Exposition

Improving warfighter readiness by strengthening industry alliances and reforming business processes

DLA Land and Maritime Supplier Conference & Exposition is a two-day event hosted by the National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) and DLA Land and Maritime to provide a forum for current and potential vendors to discuss future logistics support strategies, challenges and to streamline efforts to better support the Warfighter.  The conference will be in Columbus, Ohio at the Greater Columbus Convention Center, June 19-20, 2018. 

This year’s theme “Improving Warfighter Readiness by Improving Industry Alliances and Reforming Business Processes” speaks to the Secretary of Defense’s priorities to Restore Military Readiness as we Build a more Lethal Force, Strengthen Alliances and Attract New Partners and bring Business Reforms to the Department of Defense.  DLA’s business model is evolving from a primarily transactional model to one that values long-term relationships. To help advance our evolution, DLA is executing an active Industry Engagement Plan that fosters innovation through research and development that fully supports the Secretary’s effort. Improving Alliances and Reforming Business Processes expands opportunity for all businesses, invites smarter and innovative ways of doing business and creates greater synergy with our service partners and industry to best support the Warfighter.

DLA welcomes new businesses that want to join the team and those businesses that have been working with us for years. Our shared conference goal is improving alliances and reforming business processes to continually improve Warfighter readiness.

Visit NDIA's website for more information on the conference.

Registration Information

Exhibits

Conference Program

Bus Transportation Schedule (DLA Land and Maritime, Conference Center)
# L_2013065EN.01002201.xml

| 8.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 65/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 65/22

---

DECISION OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES

of 6 March 2013

appointing a Judge to the General Court

(2013/120/EU)

THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 19 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 254 and 255 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Under Articles 5 and 7 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and following the resignation of Mr Nils WAHL, a Judge should be appointed to the General Court for the remainder of Mr Nils WAHL's term of office, which runs until 31 August 2013. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Under Articles 5 and 7 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and following the resignation of Mr Nils WAHL, a Judge should be appointed to the General Court for the remainder of Mr Nils WAHL's term of office, which runs until 31 August 2013.

| (2) | Mr Carl WETTER has been proposed for the vacant post. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Mr Carl WETTER has been proposed for the vacant post.

| (3) | The panel set up by Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given its opinion on Mr Carl WETTER’s suitability to perform the duties of a Judge of the General Court, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The panel set up by Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given its opinion on Mr Carl WETTER’s suitability to perform the duties of a Judge of the General Court,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Carl WETTER is hereby appointed Judge to the General Court for the period from the date of the entry into force of this Decision to 31 August 2013.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 6 March 2013.

The President

R. MONTGOMERY

---
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1


November 12, 2015    


Super Micro Computer, Inc. 980 Rock Avenue
San Jose, California 95131 Attention: Legal Department


Re:  Extension of Maturity Date


Ladies and Gentlemen:


Reference is made to that certain Loan Agreement dated as of June  17, 2010 (as amended, restated, extended, supplemented or otherwise modified in writing from time to time, the "Loan Agreement "), between Bank of America, N.A. ("Bank") and Super Micro Computer, Inc., a Delaware  corporation  ("Borrower").    Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the ascribed meanings as set forth in the Loan Agreement.


Currently the maturity date of the credit accommodations provided by Bank to Borrower pursuant to the Loan Agreement as set forth in the first sentence of Section 1.2 of the Loan  Agreement is November 15, 2015 ("Maturity  Date").    Borrower has requested that the Maturity Date be extended and Bank has agreed to extend the Maturity Date to February 15, 2016.


Notwithstanding the terms and conditions set forth in the Loan Agreement, Borrower and Bank hereby agree that the date "November 15, 2015" in the first sentence of Section 1.2 of the Loan Agreement is changed to "February 15, 2016".


The extension and agreements set forth herein shall be limited precisely as written and shall not be deemed to be an extension or an agreement to any other act by Borrower which is  prohibited by the Loan Agreement. Except as specifically provided above, the extension and agreements set forth herein shall not constitute a waiver or modification of any of the terms of the Loan Agreement.


Regards,


BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. 
By: /S/ Thomas R. Sullivan
Name: Thomas R. Sullivan
Title: Senior Vice President




Acknowledged and agreed to
this 13 day of November, 2015:


SUPER MICRO COMPUTER, INC.,
a Delaware corporation


By: /S/ Howard Hideshima
Name: Howard Hideshima
Title: CFO
32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc., (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended  September 27, 2008, as filed
with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  of the date hereof (the "Annual
Report"),  I, James G. Flanigan,  Chief  Executive  Officer and President of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)    This  Annual   Report  on  Form  10-K  of  the  Company,   to  which  this
certification is attached as a Exhibit,  fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information  contained in this Annual Report fairly  presents,  in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

                                     /s/ James G. Flanigan
                                  -------------------------------------
                                  Name: James G. Flanigan
                                  Chief Executive Officer and President
                                  Date: December 22, 2008

                    The foregoing certificate is provided solely for the purpose
                    of complying with Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
                    2002 and for no other  purpose  whatsoever.  Notwithstanding
                    anything to the  contrary  set forth herein or in any of the
                    Company's previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933,
                    as  amended,  or the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
                    amended,   that  might   incorporate  the  Company's  future
                    filings, including this annual report on Form 10-K, in whole
                    or in part,  this  certificate  shall not be incorporated by
                    reference into any such filings.  A signed  original of this
                    written statement  required by Section 906 has been provided
                    to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
                    furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
                    staff upon request

                                       54
#### Kenneth E. BABB, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-29.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 30, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Indian River County; D. C. Smith, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of View Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September  30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gunther Than, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:  /s/ Gunther Than Gunther Than Chief Executive Officer November 14, 2007
# DLA Aviation commander visits Troop Support

/ Published Feb. 21, 2018
PHILADELPHIA, 
The commander of the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation made her first visit to DLA Troop Support in Philadelphia Feb. 12. 

Air Force Brig. Gen. Linda Hurry received an overview about Troop Support’s operations and briefings from the major subordinate command’s five supply chains. 

Hurry spent much of her time at Troop Support with Industrial Hardware leadership, which procures repair parts for DLA Aviation customers. 

“This is a two-way conversation for both of our teams,” Industrial Hardware Director Air Force Col. Adrian Crowley said. “If we can better understand how we’re strong and how we’re not, where we can work together and play to both teams’ strengths ... that would go a long way.” 

One such conversation was regarding IH’s prioritization of effort in their support of Aviation. 

“We prioritize not based on materiel availability and purchase order metrics,” Crowley said. “We focus on what is impacting the warfighter first. And that means we are constantly re-prioritizing our workload.”

Crowley shared IH’s successes with long term contracting programs, recently met and ongoing challenges with military repair depots, and competing priorities within and between military services. 

IH leaders also shared insight related to Commercial and Government Entity, or CAGE, fraud. CAGE hopping or jacking involves vendors providing either products that don’t conform to contract requirements, or no products at all. It effects both MSCs, and in turn the warfighter.

“I know you’re feeling it too with [DLA Aviation],” Crowley said. “Suspect CAGE activity has huge impacts for us. ... It ties up not only our inventory at the depots and the workforce that’s doing it, but it ultimately degrades our support to you.”

Concluding the informational presentations and discussions on potential ways ahead, Hurry summed up the purpose of her visit. 
“We have to be in this together,” Hurry said. “We’re all here to support the warfighter. It doesn’t really matter which part of the DLA badge we happen to have.”
# DLA Aviation and Ft. Lee military celebrate Veterans Day with local veterans

/ Published Nov. 21, 2016
Richmond, Virginia , 
Defense Logistics Agency Aviation military members from Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, and students from the Army Logistics University’s Basic Officer Leadership Course and the Army Instructor Training Course from Fort Lee, came together to visit veterans at local facilities in Hopewell on Nov. 9 and Nov. 11. The visit was to honor and remember the former and current veterans for their sacrifices in preserving our freedoms.

The group visited and presented certificates to 15 veteran residents at Gentiva Hospice Center’s River View on the Appomattox facility. 

Among those who visited were and ALU’s Basic Officer Logistics Course student, Army 2nd Lt. Nickole Kaple. She said her biggest takeaway was the immediate connection she felt between the Veterans in the facility and herself. “While our experiences in the Armed Forces differ, our appreciation of one another and our appreciation of all soldiers young and old, instantly bonds us,” said Kaple.

She also said she believes it is important to recognize our veterans because many did not receive the respect they deserved when returning from war during their time of service.

“I certainly would not be standing here today, wearing this uniform, if not for the countless sacrifices of those who served before me,” said Kaple.

DLA Aviation’s Army Maj. Alex Shimabukuro, operations officer, Customer Facing Division in the Customer Operations Directorate spoke to the group highlighting the significance of Veterans Day and honoring those who have served and are currently serving our nation.  He also gave an overview highlighting DLA Aviation's and Fort Lee's military support to the local community.  

“I am going to make visiting our Veterans a traditional part of my celebration of Veteran’s Day,” said Shimabukuro.
Exhibit 31.2  PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Gunther Than, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of View Systems, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 13, 2006 /s/ Gunther Than Gunther Than, Principal Financial Officer
#### Raymond L. TASSINARI, Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF DUNEDIN and Fred T. Peebles, Trustee, Appellees.

No. 69-314.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 4, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. GUSTE, Attorney General and Representatives R. Harmon Drew and B. F. O’Neal v. The CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, Moon Landrieu, Terrence Duvernay and Henry Simmons.

No. 62246.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 2, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana ex rel. Guste, Attorney General and Representatives R. Harmon Drew and B. F. O’Neal applying for supervisory writs. Parish of Orleans. 353 So.2d 1117.

Writ granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Melvin Duran, Judge of the Civil District, Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 16th day of June, 1978, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be fixed by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.