alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 23(a)


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-6300, 33-19372, 33-38928, 33-38925, 33-86726, 333-14607, and 333-29949 of
MFIC Corporation (the "Company") on Form S-8 of our report dated March 29,
2001, except for Note N, as to which the date is April 13, 2001 appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of MFIC Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2000.

/s/ DELOITTE AND TOUCH LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
April 13, 2001
# Quick thinking enables DLA Aviation employee to save another employee’s life 

/ Published Jan. 16, 2018
RICHMOND, VA, 
In life, there are some dates you never want to forget; a family member’s birthday, your wedding anniversary, a tax deadline. Well for Terri Parker, Nov. 1, 2017 is a day she said she will never forget. 

“I saw him sitting at the table in the bay kitchen area in a daze. I said good morning and there was no response. I said good morning again and his response was not a normal response,” she said.

Parker, a program analyst within the Fusion Operations Division of Defense Logistics Agency Aviation’s Customer Operations Directorate, said the person she saw sitting at that table in the L-Bay kitchen in Building 31 was her friend DeWitt Johnson, a customer accounts specialist in the same directorate, but from the Marine Customer Facing Division. 

She said when Johnson, a normally outgoing and friendly guy, didn’t respond, she knew something was wrong. Parker also noticed he was sweating profusely. After telling someone to call 9-1-1, Parker sprang into action. 

“I unzipped his sweater so he could cool down. I also wiped the sweat from his face and held him close to my hip so if he collapsed, he would not fall and hit his head,” she said. 

When crews from DLA Installation Operations at Richmond’s Fire and Emergency Services arrived, which Parker estimates was within two minutes, she said she told them to check Johnson’s sugar because he is diabetic. Sure enough, his numbers were dangerously low. 

Parker said it wasn’t until after emergency personnel took Johnson to the hospital, that she realized things could have turned out much differently.

“Once my adrenalin rush came down, I was so filled with emotions, I just cried. I was so thankful to God that I actually stopped, paid attention and assisted someone in dire need. I would say to others to please stop, pay attention to people and your surroundings because it could be lifesaving,” she said. 

A fact not lost on Johnson, who said he is just happy Parker was there for him when he needed her the most.

“I will be forever thankful to Terri for her quick reaction and having the courage to quickly respond to my potentially deadly situation without a second thought. The quality of being brave is something we all should value and use to help others when they need it,” said Johnson.
#### CITY OF LAFAYETTE v. J. C. MAGNON.

No. 60518.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 1977.

In re: J. C. Magnon applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order.

Writ refused. No merit in application.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-30142

 Conference Calendar 

__________________

WALTER SMITH,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JAMES SAMPLES,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 94-CV-1356

- - - - - - - - - -

August 22, 1995

Before KING, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Louisiana state prisoner Walter Smith filed a pro se, in

forma pauperis complaint alleging an Eighth Amendment violation

because he was denied his evening meal on one occasion. The

district court dismissed the complaint as frivolous under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(d).

This court reviews a prisoner's allegations challenging the

conditions of confinement under the "deliberate indifference"

standard. Wilson v. Seiter, 501 U.S. 294, 303 (1991). 
No. 95-30142

-2-

Conditions of confinement which do not lead to deprivations of

essential food, medical care, or sanitation do not amount to an

Eighth Amendment violation. Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 348

(1981). The denial of a single meal due to inadvertence or even

neglect does not rise to the level of deprivation of essential

food and is insufficient to allege a cognizable Eighth Amendment

claim.

A party is permitted to amend his pleadings once as a matter

of right before a responsive pleading is filed. See Fed. R. Civ.

P. 15(a); McGruder v. Phelps, 608 F.2d 1023, 1025 (5th Cir.

1979). The defendants were not served and no responsive pleading

was filed and, therefore, under Rule 15(a) Smith was not required

to seek leave of court to amend. This court, however, cannot

review the denial of Smith's unnecessary motion to amend because

Smith did not appeal the magistrate judge's denial of the motion

to the district court. Colburn v. Bunge Towing, Inc., 883 F.2d

372, 379 (5th Cir. 1989).

In his amended complaint Smith alleged he was again denied

an evening meal. An additional missed meal, six months later, is

insufficient to rise to the level of a constitutional claim.

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Smith

is warned that filing further frivolous appeals will result in

imposition of sanctions.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 153 (Friday, August 8, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 42733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21011]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

49 CFR Part 213

[FRA Docket No. RST-90-1, Notice No. 6]
RIN 2130-AA75


Track Safety Standards

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; date and location of public 
hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: By notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published on July 3, 
1997 (62 FR 36138), FRA proposed a rule to revise the Federal track 
safety standards. In that notice, FRA announced that it would soon 
schedule a public hearing to allow interested parties the opportunity 
to comment on issues addressed in the NPRM.

DATES: Public Hearings: The date of the public hearing is Thursday, 
September 4, 1997 at 9:00 a.m. in Washington, D.C. Any person wishing 
to participate in the public hearing should notify the Docket Clerk by 
telephone (202-632-3198) or by mail at the address provided below at 
least five working days prior to the date of the hearing and submit 
three copies of the oral statement that he or she intends to make at 
the hearing. The notification should identify who the person represents 
and the particular subject(s) the person plans to address. The 
notification should also provide the Docket Clerk with the 
participant's mailing address. FRA reserves the right to limit 
participation in the hearings of persons who fail to provide such 
notification.

ADDRESSES: (1) Docket Clerk: Written notification should identify the 
docket number and must be submitted in triplicate to the Docket Clerk, 
Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Railroad Administration, RCC-10, 400 
Seventh Street, S.W., Mail Stop 10, Washington, D.C. 20590.
    (2) Public Hearings: The hearing will be held in Room 2230 of U.S. 
Department of Transportation headquarters, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Allison H. MacDowell, Office of Safety 
Assurance and Compliance, Federal Railroad Administration, 400 Seventh 
Street, S.W., Mail Stop 25, Washington, D.C. 20590 (telephone number: 
202-632-3344), or Nancy Lummen Lewis, Esq., Office of Chief Counsel, 
Federal Railroad Administration, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Mail Stop 
10, Washington, D.C. 20590 (telephone: 202-632-3174).
S. Mark Lindsey,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-21011 Filed 8-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P
ex10a.htm


Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-193272) and Amendment No. 465 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 8, 2015, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP




Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


November 12, 2015
* * We grant the request of Delta Air Lines , Inc. ( Delta ) for an additional extension of its start

- up date for the seven Tokyo

- Guangzhou frequencies awarded by Notice of Action Taken dated November 2 4, 201 0 , in this Docket

. We will require the carrier to institute service with th o se frequencies no later than June 1 , 201 3

. Delta’s request for flexibility to use those frequencies in any U.S.

- China city

- pair market for which Delta holds underlying authority, American Airlines, Inc. ’s (American) Answer , and American’s related request for flexibility , remain under consideration and will be dealt with in a separate order

.
No. 00-7043.

#### Green *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
# DLA Energy officer selected for LRO award

/ Published Jan. 18, 2019

She attributed her award to her peers, coworkers and employees for teaching her what she knows about Defense Logistics Agency Energy.

Air Force Capt. Angele Montfort was selected as the DLA 2018 Air Force Outstanding Logistics Readiness Officer of the Year in December 2018.

“She is an outstanding Logistics Readiness officer,” said DLA Energy Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Albert Miller in an announcement to the workforce. “This is a tremendous accomplishment, especially when you consider the phenomenal pool of competition. We are extremely proud of you ... keep up the great work.”

An LRO of seven years, Montfort has been assigned to DLA Energy for the past year and a half in the Logistics Career Broadening Program. She said the intent of the career broadening program is for company grade officers to rotate to multiple sections in DLA Energy to understand processes at the strategic level. Currently, she is in the DLA Energy Operations Center but plans on working with the DLA Energy International Agreements team next.

“It is an honor to receive this distinguished award,” Montfort said. 

Montfort will now compete for the Air Force District of Washington LRO of the Year Award.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of SureWest Communications (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:    February 25, 2011

By:

/s/STEVEN C. OLDHAM Steven C. Oldham,
President and Chief Executive Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SureWest Communications and will be retained by SureWest Communications and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certificate is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be considered filed as part of the
Form 10-K.

---



QuickLinks
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 8, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50366

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE ANTONIO CABALLERO-TREJO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CR-2287

--------------------

Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Antonio

Caballero-Trejo raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Alex Werber, the Chief Financial Officer of Tissera, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the fiscal quarter
ended October 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 18, 2005

                                             By: /s/Alex Werber
                                                 -------------------------------
                                             Name: Alex Werber
                                             Title: Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of View Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gunther Than, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    By:  /s/ Gunther Than Gunther Than Chief Executive Officer   August 14, 2007
#### Clarence Frederick SLAWSON v. Patricia Ann SLAWSON.

No. 49984.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 28, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 16, 1977.

Barnett, Montgomery, McClintock & Cunningham, Ross Barnett, Jr., G. William Palmer, Richard C. Williams, Jr., Jackson, for appellant.

M. Charles May, Jackson, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Hinds County; James Arden Barnett, Chancellor.

AFFIRMED ON CROSS APPEAL, REVERSED ON DIRECT APPEAL AND RENDERED.

INZER and SMITH, P. JJ., and ROBERTSON, BROOM, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21323]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-2460-000]


Unitil Power Corporation; Notice of Filing

August 7, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 1, 1997, Unitil Power Corporation, 
tendered for filing an amendment in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before August 20, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21323 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE REGULATION, )

et al. , ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) No. 09-1322 (and ) consolidated cases) UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL ) PROTECTION AGENCY, ) Respondent. )

________________________ _____________________ )

COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE REGULATION, ) INC., et al. , ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) No. 10-1073 (and ) consolidated cases) UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL ) PROTECTION AGENCY, ) Respondent. )

________________________ _____________________ ) ) COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE REGULATION, )

et al. , ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) No. 10-1092 (and ) consolidated cases) UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL ) PROTECTION AGENCY, ) Respondent. )____________________________ _________________ ) SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION, ) INC., et al. , ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) No. 10-1131 (and ) consolidated cases) UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL ) PROTECTION AGENCY, ) Respondent. )ADDENDUM TO DECLARATION OF REGINA MCCARTHY FILED ON OCT. 28, 2010.

1. In my declaration dated October 28, 2010, which EPA attached to EPA’s “Response to Motions to Stay” (October 28, 2010), I discusse d the status of state efforts to incorporate Tailoring Rule thresholds into state law. Exhibit 13, “Declaration of Regina McCarthy” (“McCarthy Decl.”); Attachment 1 to McCarthy Decl. The dates for state law actions provided

in the declaration and in Attachment 1 were “r easonably expected based on statements by state officials to EPA regional offi cials, in written communica tions and in meetings and

teleconferences.” Attachme nt 1 to McCarthy Decl.; see also McCarthy Decl., ¶ 55. EPA anticipated that events could cause state law acti ons to take more or less time than estimated. Attachment 1 to McCarthy Decl. Since that time, EPA has received updated information from three states, as discussed below:

2. The McCarthy Decl. and Table 3 in Attach ment 1 indicate that EPA expected that South Dakota would complete state law amendments to incorporate Tailoring Rule thresholds into its state law by January 10, 2011. EPA now expects that South Dakota will complete state law amendments, and those amendments will beco me effective, in March 2011 at the earliest.

3. The McCarthy Decl. and Table 3 in Attach ment 1 indicate that EPA expected that Maine would complete state law amendments to incorporate Tailoring Rule thresholds into its state law on Feb. 2, 2011. EPA now expects that Maine will complete state law amendments by Jan. 20, 2011.

4. The McCarthy Decl. and Table 3 in Attach ment 1 indicate that EPA expected that Vermont would complete state law amendments to incorporate Tailoring Rule thresholds into its state law by the end of 2010. EPA now expect s that Vermont will complete state law amendments by the end of 2010 or shortly thereafter.

I declare under penalty of perjury the foregoing, as well as thos e contained in my Declaration of October 28, 2010, to be true and correct to the be st of my knowledge, information and belief.

Executed this 4th of November, 2010 /s/ Regina McCarthy Assistant Administrator Office of Air and Radiation United States EPA
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,473
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,275
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     45,951
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          13,957
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            14,086
<LOANS>                                        202,214
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,533
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 294,579
<DEPOSITS>                                     251,728
<SHORT-TERM>                                    13,046
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,302
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,500
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,003
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 294,579
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 18,616
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,339
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   580
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                22,235
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               9,202
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,863
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,672
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      544
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (34)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,816
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,016
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,201
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,201
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.60
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.74
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,728
<LOANS-PAST>                                       273
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   637
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,370
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      440
<RECOVERIES>                                        59
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,533
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,227
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,306
        

</TABLE>