t

a

c/

U.S. Department

of Transportation

Federal Aviat-bn

Administration

Airport Capacity

and Delay

I

REPRINT INCORPORATES

CHANGE 1 AND 2 ,

AC:l50/5060-5

Date: 9-23-83 Advisory Circular

Portions of this AC are under review for update. 

Please contact the appropriate Regional Office or 

Airports District Office for assistance. 
Advisory

Circular

subject: AIRPORT CAPACITY AND DELAY hte: 9123183 - AC No: 150/5060-S

Initiated by: AAS- CbaRtge:

lm PURPOSE. This advisory circular (AC) explains how to compute airport capacity

and aircraft delay for airport planning and design.

2. CANCELLATIONS. This publication cancels the 'following Federal Aviation Administration (FM) Advisory Circulars (ACs):

a. AC 150/5060-lA, Airport Capacity Criteria Used in Preparing the National

Airport Plan, dated July 8, 1968, and

b. AC 150/5060-3A, Airport Capacity Criteria Used in Long Range Planning,

dated December 24, 1969.

3, BACRCROUND, Changes in the composition of the nation's aircraft fleet together

with improvements in air traffic control (ATC) practices have outdated capacity

calculations contained the cancelled ACs. An FAA contractor reexamined the procedures for determining airport capacity and suggested improvements to update them.

This AC implements these improve=nts. In addition, this AC refines definitions of

capacity and delay. CAPACITY is the throughput rater i.e. the maximum number of

operations that can take place in an hour. DELAY is the difference in time between

a constrained and an unconstrained aircraft operation. These definitions take into

account that delays occur because of simultaneous demands on the facility. The

- acceptable level of delay will vary from airport to airport.

4 APPLICATION TO AIRPORT DESIGN. To apply these procedures, a reasonable

u;derstanding of the aeronautical activities being conducted* at, or projected forV

the airport is required. Care should be exercised in using available data so as to

avoid data which represents a level of activity occurring sporadically during the

year -unless it is intended to examine that specific condition. Since few airports

operate at ‘peak demandm levels for more than two or three consecutive, hours in any

one day and demand fluctuates throughout a period even as short as one hour@ sme

delay will occur during a typical hours operations. It is suggested that airport

design-be based on an hourly demand which can be expected&o occur at least on a

weekly basis.
AC 150/5060-S g/23/83

6 o REEFERENCE. &port No. FM-RD-74-124, Techniques for Determining Airport Airside 1

Capacity and Delay, dated June 1976 is available from the National Technical

Information Service (MIX& 5285 Pact Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161,

telephone (703) 553-4650. 'Ihe NTIS refereme number is AD-A032 475.

Director, Office of Airport Standards
12/l/95 AC 150/5060-5 CHG 2

CONTENTS

Paragraph Y Page

l-l.

lL2.

l-3.

1-4.

2-1 .

2 2

213:

2-4.

2-5 .

2-6 .

2-7 .

3-1 .

3-2 .

3 3- .

3-4.

3-5 .

3-6 .

3-7 .

3-a .

3-9 .

3-10.

3-11.

4-l.

4-2.

4-3

4-4:

4-s.

4-6.

5-l .

S-2 .

53- .

5-4 .

5-5

5-6 .

5-7.

5-a .

CHAPTER 1. AIRPORT CAPACITY AND DELAY

General ................................................................ 1

AirportComponents ....................................................... 1

CapacityTerms .......................................................... 2

Capacity, Demand, Deiay Relationships ........................................... 4

CHAPTER 2. PRELIMINARY PROCEDURES

General ................................................................. 5

Capacity Assumptions ...................................................... 5

ASVAssumptions ................... .., .................................... 5

AirportCapacityandAnnualServiceVolume ....................................... 6 - Aircraft Delay ............................................................ 6

AirportDesign ........................................................... 6

CostofAircraftDelays ...................................................... 7

CHAPTER 3. AIRPORT CAPACITY AND AIRCRAFT DELAY CALCULATIONS

General ............................................................... 13

HouriyCapacityofRunwayComponent .......................................... 13

HourlyCapacityofTaxiwayComponent ......................................... 15

HourlyCapacityofGateGroupComponents.. ..................................... 15

AirportHourlyCapacity.. .................................................. 15

Annual Service volume (ASV) ................................................ 16

Hourly Delay to Aircraft on the Runway Component ................................. 17

Daily Delay to Aircraft on the Runway Component When the D/C Ratio is 1.0 or Less for Each Hour . . 18

Daily Delay to Aircraft on the Runway Component When the D/C Ratio is Greater Then 1.0 for One or More

Hours............: ..................................................... 18

AnnuaIDelaytoAircraftontheRunwayComponent .................................. I9

Hourly Demands Corresponding to a Specified Level of Average Hourly Delay ................. 20

CHAPTER 4. SPECIAL APPLICATIONS

General ............................................................... 77

PVCConditions ......................................................... 77

AbsenceofRadarCoverageorILS.. ........................................... 77

Parallel Runway airports With One Runway Restricted to Use by Small Aircraft ................ 77

SingleRunwayAirport--SmaIlAircraftOnIy ....................................... 78

ThreshoidStagger ........................................................ 78

CHAPTER 5. COMPUTER PROGMS FOR AIRPORT CAPACITY & AIRCRAFT DELAY

General ............................................................... 91

SimulationModel(SIMMOD). ............................................... 91

Airport Model . . . . . . . . . . .

Airfield Delay Simulation Modei

Airfield Capacity Model. . . . . .

Model Availability . . . . . . . . .

Airport Design Computer Model

Proprietary Models . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . ..*....*.............................. 91

ADSIM).........................................9 1

. ............................................. 92

.

.

.............................................. 92

.............................................. 92

.............................................. 92

. . .

111
P=F3=Ph Page

1.

2.

APPEXDK 1. FuXNMPLES -PLYING CHAPTER 2 CALCULATIONS

General z................: l l l . .a l l l l l - l l l l l l l l l l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Esampks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...-.* l l l l l l l l l l : l l l l l l l l l l l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

APPENDIX 2. EXAIWLES APPLYING CHAPTER 3 CALCULATIONS

1 . Gtmerd . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..~..~~~~~~.~~....~.....~~.................. 1

2 . Examples . . . . . ..~..~....~~..~~.........~..-.~.........~.............~... 1

APPE?JDIX 3. ExAMfLES APPLYING CHAPTER 1 PROCEDURES

1. General ......................m.. . l ........e.-..- l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2 . Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..~.~.-..~~~~........................... 1

APPENDIX 4. GLOSSARY OF SYMBOLS/TERMS (2 pages)

APPENDIX 5. BLANK FORMS (26 pages)

Table Page

l-l.

2 1- .

2-2 .

31- .

3 2- .

Aircrafi’ciassifications ...................................................... 2

Assumptions incorporated in figure 2 ............................................. 5

T’ypicalaixportcapacityanddeiayprintout ......................................... 7

ASV weighting factors ..................................................... 16

Typicaldemandratios ..................................................... 17

Figure Page

21- .

2-2 .

31- .

3-2 .

CapacityandASVforlongrangeplanning ......................................... 8

Averageaircraftdelayforlongrangeplanning...................................... 12

Information required for capacity and delay calculations ................................ 14

Runway-usediagrams ..................................................... 21

3-3 to 342. Hourly capacity of runway-use dia@ams for VFR conditions ............... :.......... 23-42

3-43 to 3-65. Hourly capacity of runway-use diagrams for IFR conditions ........................ 43-54

3-66. Hourly capacity of a taxiway crossing an active runway with arrivals only, or with mixed operations ... 55

3-67. Hourly capacity of a taxiway crossing an active runway w&out arrivals ..................... 56

3-68. Hourlycapacityofgates.;. ................................................... 57

3-69. Averageaircraftdelayinanhour .............................................. 58

3-70. Average aircrafi delay during saturated conditions .................................... 59

3-71 to 3-89. Delay indices for runwav-use diagrams in VFR conditions

3-90 to 3-102. Deiav indices for runwiy-use diagrams in IFR conditions ...................................................

61-70

70-76

4-L Special ap&ation ..................................................... 1 . 80

4-2 to 4-14 H&Iv capacity of runwav-use diagrams (Capacity 4 in PVC) .......................

4-15 & 4-k Houiiy capacity of runwiy-use diagrams (In radarkmnradar environment)

81-84

................. 85

4-17 to 4-20. Hourly capacity of runway-use diagrams (Runway restricted use in VFR) ................. 86

4-21 to 4-25 Hourly capacity of runwav-use diagrams (Runway restricted use in IFR) ................ 87-88

4-26. Hourly capacity of single runiay airports, without radar coverage, or ILS serving small aircraft only . l 89
121 l/95 AC 150/5060-5 CHG 2

Figure Page

Al-l.

AM.

AI-3. ’ Al4

AX.

AX.

AX.

A24

A2-5.

AX.

A2-7.

A2-8.

AL9.

A2-IO.

A3-1.

AZ-Z.

A3-3.

A34

As-l.

A592.

As-3.

A.54

ASS.

AS-&

M-7.

A5-8.

A5-9.

AS-IO.

AS-IL

As-12.

A5-13.

Investigate runwav capabilirv ..................................................

kunwa~configurakons

2

Identify ............................................... .3

Determine annual delav ....

Savings associated with reduced delay ............................................................................................

4

5

Hourlycapacirvoftherunwaycomponent

Hourly capacity of the taxiwav component

.......................................... 2

Hourly capacity of the gate gioup componen; : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ..............................

6

8

Airporthourlycapacity.. ................................................... 10

Annuaiservicevolume.. ................................................... 11

Hourlydelay ........................................................... 1 3

Dailv delay, D/C ratio equal or less than 1.00

Dai~ydeiay,D/Cratioisgreaterthan1.00 ...............................................................................

17

19 . Annualdelay ........................................................... 22

Hourly demand at a specified level of delay.

Hourly capacity in PVC conditions . .....................................................................................

26

2

Hourly capacity on the absence of radar coverage or ILS ................................ 4

Hourlv capacity of paralIe1 runway airport with one runway restricted to small aircraft .... . .

Hourly capacity of a single runway airport used exclusively by skII aircraft that lacks radar or ILS

........... 6

8

Hourly capacie, ASV, de!av for long range Dhnhg

Houriycapaciryrunwaycor;lponent....”.~

.................................. 3

........................................ 5

Hourly capacity taxiway component .............................................. 7

Hourly capacity gate group component ............................................ 9

Airporthourlycapacity.. ................................................. 11

kbnuai service volume ..................................................... 13

Hourlydeiay ........................................................... 15

Dailydelav ............................................................ 17

Tabulatiod hourly demand for representative davs 19

Hourly delay, different demands ........ . : ......................................................................... 21

Annualdelay ........................................................... 23

Savings associated with reduced delav

The runway-use configuration sketchks printout

............................................................................. . 25

26-27

V
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

CHAPTERI.. AIRPORT CAPACITY AND AIRCRAFT DELAY

1-l. GENERAL. Haurly airport capacities and annual aircraft delay canputations are

needed to design and evaluate airport develapnrent and improvemnt projects. The

method for computing airport capacity and aircraft delay is the thrarghput method

provided in this AC.

a. Background. The throughput roethod for calculating airport capacity and

average delay per aircraft is derived from computer models used by the Bderal

Aviation Administration (FAA) to analyze airport capacity and reduce aircraft delay.

Calculations of hourly capacity are needed to determine average delay. Since airport

and airport component hourly capacities vary throughout the day due to variations in

runway use, aircraft mix, ATC rules, etc.@ a number of calculations mnay be meded.

b 0 AC Organization.

(1) Chapter 1 provides an overview of airport capacity and aircraft

delay analyses.

(2) Chapter 2 contains calculations for computing airport capacity,

annual service volume (Asv), and aircraft delay for long range evaluations.

(3) Chapter 3 contains more detailed computations suitable for a wide

range of airport design and planning applications.

(4) Chapter 4 contains special computations of capacity relating to:

(i) Periods of poor visibility and ceiling conditions.

(ii) Airports without radar coverage and/or an instrument landing

system (ILS).

(iii) Airports with parallel runways when one runway is limited to use

by small aircraft.

(5) Chapter 5 identifies ccmputer models which may be used to further

refine runway capacity and aircraft delay analyses.

(6) The appendices contain examples applying chapter 2, 3, and 4

calculations.

c. Units. Since FM operational standards for spacing aircraft taking-off

and landingxin customary units (feet, knots, etc.), it is expedient to perform

capacity and delay computations in the same units.

l-2. AIRPORTCOMPONENTS,

a. Runway. The term runway includes the landing surface, plus those portions

of the approach and departure paths used in common by all aircraft.

b Taxiway l The term taxiway includes the parallel taxiways, entrarxre-exit

taxiway:, and crossing taxiways, recognizing that a capacity limiting condition may

exist where an arriving or departing stream of aircraft must cross an active runway.

Chap 1

Par 1-1

1
AC 150/5060-5 9;/23/83

c. Gate Group. The term gate graup identifies the number of gates located in

the terminal cmplex which are used by an airline, or shared by two or xxe airli- .'

nes, or other aircraft operating at the airport on a regularly scheduled basis. In

most cases the terminal gates are not used by general aviation aircraft.

l-3. CAPACITY !CERB'So The following subpargraphs defim terms used herein. Symbols

used in this AC are defined in Appendix 4, Glossary of Symbols/Terms.

a. Aircraft Mix. Aircraft mix is the relative percentage of operations

conducted by each of the fax classes of aircraft (A, B, C, and D). Table l-1 identifies physical aspects of the four aircraft classes and their relationship to terms

used in the wake turbulence standards.

Table l-l. Aircraft classif ications

Aircraft

class

Bhx. Cert. T.0. Number ake Turbulence

might (lbs) EngiIES Classification

I

1 12,500 or less L

Single

t Small (S)

I Mllti

112,500 - 300,000 Mrlti Large (El I

D over 300,000 I m1ti I

b Annual Service Volume (ASV)

annualiapacity.

ASV is a reasonable estimate of an airport's

It accounts for differences in runway use, aircraft mix, weather

conditions, etc., that waald be encmntered over a year's time.

c. m. Capacity (throughput capacity) is a measure of the maximum

number of aircraft operations which can be accommmdated on the airport or airport

cmponent in an hour. Sirrce the capacity of an airport component is independent of

the capacity of other airport components, it can be calculated separately.

d Geiling and Visibility. For purposes of this AC, the terms VFR, IFR, and

PVC are'used as measures relating to the following ceilings and visibilities.

(1) Visual flighf rule (VFR) conditions occur whenever the clard ceiling

is at least 1,000 feet above gramd level and the visibility is at least three statute miles.

(2) Instrmnt flight rule (IFR) conditions occur whenever the reported

clard ceiling is at least 500 feet but less than 1,000 feet and/or Visibility is at

least one statute mile but less than three statute miles.

(3) Poor visibility and ceiling (PVC) conditions exist whenever the clad

ceiling is less than 500 feet and/or the visibility is less than one statute mile,

e. Delay. Delay is the difference between constrained and unconstrained

operating tim.

QIcrPl

Par l-2
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-5

f . Demand. Demand is the magnitude of aircraft operations to be accamnodated

in a specified time period.

9 l Gate. A gate is an aircraft parking position used by a single aircraft

loading orxoading passengers, mail, cargo, etc. A parking position which is

regularly used by two aircraft at the sam tim is two gates for capacity

calculations. 1

. (1) Gate type is the size of the gate. A Type 1 gate is capable of accoenmdating all aircraft, including widebodies such as the A-300, B-747, B-767, DC-lo,

L-1011. A Type 2 gate will acconmmdate only non-widebodied aircraft. .

(2) Gate mix is the percent of non-widebodied aircraft accommodated by

the gate group.

(3) Gate occupa~y tinr, isthe length of time required to cycle an

aircraft through the gate.

h Mix Index. Mix index is a mathematical expression. It is the percent of

Class C'aircraft plus 3 tims the percent of Class D aircraft, and is written:

%(C+3D),

i Percent Arrivals (PA). The percent of arrivals is the ratio of arrivals to

total operations and iscoquted as foiloum

Percent arrival8 *

A+#(T&G)

A+M+(T&G) x 100, where

A - number of arriving aircraft in the hour

DA = number of dep&rtin# aircraft in the hour

T&G - number of tamh and go’s in the hour

j. Percent Touch and Go%. 2% perpent touch and go’s is the ratio of landings

with an immediate takeoff to total operations and is cauputed as folluws:

T&G Percent touch and go'8 = &+(k&G)x 100, where

A - number of arriving aircraft in the hour

DA = number of departing aircraft in the hour

T&G - number of touch and go@8 in the haur

Touch and go operations are normally associated with flight training. The number of

these operations usually decreases as the number of air carrier operations increase,

as demand for service approaches runway capacity, or as weather conditions

deteriorate.

k Runway-use Configuration. Ihrnway-use configuration is the number,

locatioi, and orientation of the active runway(s) , the type and direction of

operations , and the flight rules in effect at a particular time.

Chap 1

Par l-3
Ac 150/5060-5 g/23/83

1-4. CAPACITY, DEblAND, DELAY RELATIONSHIPS, As demand approaches capacity, fndivi- :'

dual aircraft de&y is increased. Successive hourly demands exceeding the haray

capacity result in unacceptable delays. When the hourly demand is less than the

hourly capacity, aircraft delays will still occur if the demand within a pmtion of

the time interval exceeds the capacity during that interval, Because the magnitude

and scheduling of user demand isrelatively unconstrained, reductions in aircraft

delay can best be achieved thrcmgh airport improvements which increase capacity.

4

Chap 1

Para l-4
12J1195 AC 150/5060-5 CMG 2

CHAPTER 2. CAPACITY AND DELAY CALCULATIONS FOR LONG RANGE PLANNING

2-l. This chapter GENERAL. contains calculations for determining hourly airport capacity, ASV, and aircraft delay

for long-range airport planning. Appendix 1 contains examples of these calculations. When more precise results are

required, or if the conditions differ significantly from the assumptions described in the following paragraphs, apply the

calculations found in subsequent chapters.

2 2 CAPACITY ASSUMPTIONS. Hourly VFR and IFR values in figure 2-1 are based on runway utilizations which

p&we the highest sustainable capacity consistent with current ATC ties and practices. These values are representative

of typical U.S. airports having similar runway-use configurations. VFR and IFR hourIy airport capacities in figure 2-l

are based on the following assumptions:

a. Runwav-use Confkuratio~. Any runway layout can be approximated by one of the 19 depicted runway-use

configurations. Multiple arrival streams are only to parallel runway configurations.

b .

c.

d.

Percent Arrivals. Arrivals equal departures.

Percent Touch and Go’s. The percent of touch and go’s is within the ranges in table 2-1.

Thereaxiway. is a full-length parallel taxiway, ample runway entrance/exit taxiways, and no taxiway

crossing problems.

e. Airspace Limitations There are no airspace limitations which would adversely impact flight operations or

otherwise restrict aircraft which could operate at the airport. Missed approach protection is assured for all converging

operations in IFR weather conditions.

f Runwav Instrumentation The airport has at least one runway equipped with an ILS and has the necessary

1 ATC fakities and services to carry but operations in a radar environment. For independent operations, 3,400 feet

1 separation requires Precision Runway Monitor (PRhQ equipment with high update radar. If PRM equipment is not

I available, independent operatios will require 4,300 feet separation.

Table 2-1. Assumptions incorporated in figure 2-l

Mix Index Percent

%(C+3D) Arrivals

Percent

Touch & Go

Demand Ratios

emand Av. Dailv Demand*

Av. Daily Demand* Av. Peak Hour Demand*

. O-20 50 . O-50 290 9

2 l-50 n 040 300 10

5 l-80 n O-20 . 310 11

81-120 n 0 320 12

121-180 n 0 350 14

* In the peak month

2-3 ASV ASSUMPTIONS. The ASV values in figure 2-l are based on the assumptions of paragraph 2-2, table 2-k

and. the following:

a. IFR Weather. weather conditions occur roughly 10 percent of the time.

Chap 2

Par 2-l 5
AC 150/5060-5 CHG 2 12/l/95

I

1

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I *

I

I

2 6 AIRPORT DESIGN COMPUTER MODI& The Airport Design Computer Model capacity md delay outputs are

the ‘same as those obtained from this chapter. The cimputer model covers the same runway-use configurations and traffk

mixes as figure 2-1.

a. Entry The computer model requires the following: Data.

(I) The percentage of operations by aircraft weighirig more&an 12,500 pounds but less than 300,000

pounds with respect to the total number of aircraft operations.

(2) The Percentage of operations by aircraft weighing more than 300,000 pounds with respect to the total

number of aircraft operations. -

(3) The targeted level of annual operations (the demand).

(4) The predominate operations (either air carrier or general aviation).

b . Output. The Airport Design model lists the runway-use configurations in rank order of capacity and least

delay. Other considerations (project costs and/or land availability) may preclude the selkction and development of the

highest ranking runway-use configuration (normally configuration No. 8). Table 2-2 illustrates a typical airport capacity

and delay printout. Figure A543 illustrates a printout of the runway-use configuration sketches.

b &,WVa~-uSe Confkuratioq ROU@Y 80 percent of the time the airport is operated with the runway-use

configurition which produces the greatest houriy capacity.

2-4

the*ASV as follows:

AIRPORT CAPACITY AN\D ANNU~WCE VOLM. Calculate the approximate hourly capacities and

a. Determine the percentage of aircraft classes C and D using, or expected to use, the airport.

b Select the runway-use configuration from figure 2-1 that best represents the airport. Runway-use

configurations 9 through 19 show by means of arrows the predominant direction of runway operations. When no direction

is specified, the direction of operation is not critical. Runway-use configurations 14 through 19 indicate by dashed lines

the limit of the range of runway orientation. For airports having three or more runway orientations (consider parallel

runways as one runway orientation), identify the two-runway orientation that is operated most frequently.

staggered thresholds see paragraph 4-6.

To adjust for

c. Calculate the mix index.

d. Read the approximate VFR and IFR hourly capacities and the ASV directly from figure 2-l.

2 - . 5 ~IRCIUFT DELA Y. Calculate the aircraft delay as follows:

a. Estimate annual demand using current or historical tiormation or projections of future traffic.

b . Calculate the ratio of annual demand to ASV.

c. Obtain average delay per aircraft from figure 2-2. The upper portion of the band applies to airports where

air carrier oPerations dominate. The fU width of the band applies to airports where general aviation operations dominate.

Delays 5 to 10 times average could be experienced by individual aircraft.

d. CalcuIate total annual aircraft delay as the average delay multiplied by the annual demand.

Chap2

Par 2-4
12/l/95 AC 150/5060-5 CHG 2

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

Table 2-2. Typical airport capacity and delay printout

AIRPORT CAPACITY AEJD DELAY DATA

c = Percent of airplanes over 12,500 Ibs but not over 300,000 Ibs . 55

D = Percent of airplanes over 300,000 lbs . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

'Mix'Index (C+3D) . . . . . . . . . - . - l . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67

Annual demand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220,000

Air carrier operations dominate

AIRPORT CAPACITY AND DELAY FOR LONG RANGE PLANNING

Runway-use Capacity

Configuration

(Sketch)

No.

(Ops/Hour)

VFR IFR

Ratio of Average

Annual Delay per Minutes of

Dekand Aircraft Annual Delay

to Asv

(Minutes) (000)

Ratio

8 242 111 515,000 0.43

7 184 111 45s,ooo 0.48

4 126 111 305,000 0.72

12 126 111 305,000 0.72

6 184 65 290,000 0.76

5 171 65 285,000 0.77

3 126 6S 275,000 0.80

11 126 65 275,000 0.80

16 164 56 275,000 0.80

18 164 56 275,000 0.80

19 158 56, 275,000 0.80

13 145 56 270,000 0.81

2 121 56 260,000 0.85

10 121 S6 260,000 0.85

17 121 56 260,000 0.85

14 85 56 220,000 1.00

z5 82 56 21s,ooo 1.02

9 77 56 215,000 1.02

1 63 56 205,000 1.07

ASV

Low High Low High

0.3

0.3

0.7

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.0

1.0

1-C

1.0

1.0

1.1

1.1

1.1

2.3

2~6

2.6

3.6

0.4 . 66 88

0.s 66 110

1.1 154 242

1.1 154 242

1.2 176 264

1.3 198 286

1.5 220 330

1.5 220 330

1.5 220 330

1.5 220 330

1.5 220 330

1-s 220 330

1.7 242 374

1.7 242 374

1.7 242 374

3.5 506 770

4.0 572 880

4.0 572 880

5.7 792 1254

27 COST OF AIRCRAFT DET&IYS A major factor which influences a decision to proceed witi a project i]s the

benefit versus the cost of the improvement: The airport capacity and aircraft delay computations operate on the premise

that individual aircraft within the broad aircraft classes A, B, C, and D (See table l-1) have comparable service times.

A cost computation however requires a more refined breakdown of aircraft types and usages. _

a. P&iv Costs. The per minute costs of figure M-12 are conservative estimates and are based on the best data

currently available. The costs represent a reasonable estimate of crew, fuel and maintenance costs for operators of air

carrier and air taxi aircraft, and fuel and maintenance costs for operators of general aviation aircraft. Other data sources

may be used in the calculation of savings. When other data sources are used, document the data source as well as the

rationale used to allocate delay savings among the cost classes being identified.

b Estimating Savins. Appendix 1 contains an example for calculating the savings associated witi the reduced

aircraft delays based on the figure A542 aircraft groupings and estimates of delay costs. Figure M- 12 is the form used

in this calculation.

Chap 2

n--e l rarkl r)/
AC 15OMMO-5CHG2

NO.

L *

Ebunway-useConfiguration

2.

7

3, 4

T1

2500’ * to 3399’ or 4299* =-

I

- l

4 . -

A b

b

?400’+ or43Oi)’ + l *

--w ëI 6 4

B

w

.

.

m'"to 249gr

-0

t

.

* Staggered threshold adjustments may apply, see paragraph 4-6.

** Refer to paragraph 32.f.

98 59 23Q,OQC

74 37 uf,aau

63 54 205,3C3

ss 53 210) QCO

Sl 50 240,000

a to 20 197 62 35,am

21 tc so u9 63 20s,acx

51 tu 80 LX 65 275 ,a00

81 tn La ~‘LI 70 3ao,aa3

121 ta Las La3 75 36s ,OGO

147 119 370 ,cau

149 113 3tu ,UUQ

I.26 iI1 305 ,NO

ILL LOS 3~3,600

La3 99 370 ,OCQ

a tc 20 295 62 385 ,.a30

21 to so 21s 63 30s ,caa

51 t o 00 131 65 205 ,QQQ

8L tc 120 L49 70 310, OQQ

Lam to LBC I.29 75 375 I OQQ

Figure 2-1. Capacity and ASV for long range planning
lzf l/95 AC 150/5060-5 CHG 2

No. Runway-use Configuration

Hourly Annual

Capacity Service

Mix Index ops/= Volume

%(c+30) WR IIPR Ops/Yr

6 l f 0 to 20 295 62 385,000

70qto 2499' 21 to 50 219 63 310,000 +

. .t 51 to 80 184 65 290,ooa

2500'"t03399'0r4299'" 81 to 120 161 70 315,ooa

1 f m . 121 to 180 146 75 385,000

0 to 20 29s 119 625,000 .

21 to so 219 114 475,000

51 to 80 184 111 455,000

81 to 120 161 117 510,000

121 to 180 146 120 645,000

700' ;-;;e2499g -x-

- I

8 * 0 to 20

3400'+0;4300'+" . -- *-I . 1 21 51 to to 80 50

. . -i-' 1

700' L-2494'

81 to 120

"L

121 to 180

9 0 Oto 20 98 59 230,000

.21 to 50 77 57 200,000

51 to 80 77 56 21s,ooo

81 to 120 76 59 225,ooa

121 to 180 72 60 265,000

lo- 0 to 20

21 to so

5i to 80

81 to 120

121 to 180

* Staggered threshold adjustments may apply, see paragraph 46.

** Refer to paragraph 2-2.f.

394 119 715,000

290 114 550,ooa

242 111 sls,ooa

210 117 565,000

189 120 675,000

197 59 355,000

14s 57 275,000

121 56 260,000

10s 59 285,000

94 60 340,000

Figure 2-l l Capacity and ASV for long range planning (cont.)

Chap 2
AC 150/5060-5 CHG 2 12!11'95

Runway-use Configuration

Mix Index

%(C+3lI)

11. 0 to 20

21 to so

25oo'"to

*

3399'0r4299'" 51 to 80

121 81 to to 120 180

12 0

13 l

14.

0 to 20

n 21 to so

3400'+or4300'+" 51 to 80

81 to 120

121 to 180

Oto 2 0

21 to 50

51 to 80

81 to 120

121 to 180

0 to 20 150 59 270,000

21 to 50 108 57 225,000

51 to 80 85 56 220,000

81 to 120 '77 59 225,000

121 to 180 73 60 265,000

Oto 2 0

21 to so

51 to 80

81 to 120

121 to 180

'k \

\\

'1 ' .'

* Staggered threshold adjustments may apply,see paragraph 4-6.

** Refer to paragraph 2-X

Hourly

Capacity

Ops/-

62

63

65

70

7s

197 119

149 114

126 111

111 105

103 99

197 s9

147 57

145 56

138 59

12s 60

Annual

S&vice

Volume

OpS/YS

355,000

285,OCO

275,000

300,000

365,000

370,000

320,000

305,000

315,000

370,000

355,000

275,000

270,000

295,000

350,000

132 59 260,000

99 57 220,000

82 56 21s,ooo

77 59 225,ooc1

73 60 265,000

Figure 2-I. Capacity and ASV for Iong range planning (cont.)

10 Chap Z
12/l/95 AC 150/5060-5 CHG2

No. Runway-use Configuration

I

17 A? -

0 700' to 2499' L

18 0

Eiourly Annual

Capacity Service

Mix Index OpS/Ht Volume

%(C+3D) WR IFR ops/Yr

Oto 20 295 59 385,000

21 to so 210 57 305,000

51 to 80 164 56 275,000

81 to 120 146' s9 300,000

121 to 180 129 60 3ss,ooo

0 to 20 197 59 3ss,ooo

21 to so 14s 57 275,000

51 to 80 121. 56 260,000

81 to 120 10s 59 285,000

121 to 180 94 60 340,000

301 59 385,000

210 57 305,000

164 56 275,000

146 59 300,000

129 60 3ss,ooo

2499'

to 20 264 59 375,000

to so 193 57 295,000

to 80 158 56 275,000

to 120 146 s9 300,000

180 129 60 3s5,ooo

00' to 2499'

Figure 2-L . Capacity and Asv for long range planning (cont.)

11 chap2
12/l/95 AC 150/5060-3 CHG2

I-L

a

u

t>

u

a

W

>

a

8

7

6

5

11b

3

2

1

0

I2

RATIO OF ANNUAL DEMAND TO ANNUAL SERVICE VOLUME

Figure 2-1. Average aircraft delay for long range phnning

Chap 2
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

*mR3. AIRPORTCAPACITYANDAIRCRAFTDRLAYCALCULATIONS

3-1. GmmRAL. This chapter contains instructions for calculating hourly capacity,

ASV, and aircraft delay for a wide range of runway-use configurations and operational alternatives.

a. Capacity Calculations.

(1) Hourly capacity of the runway component.

(2) Hourly capacity of the taxiway canponent.

(3) Harrly capacity of gate group camponents.

(4) Airport hourly capacity.

(5) ASK

b 0 Delay Calculations.

(1) Hourly delay.

(2) Daily delay.

(3) Annual delay.

Figure 3-l provides a checklist of the data required .for these calculations.

Appendix 2 contains examples of these calculations.

3-2. HOURLYCAPACITYOFTHBRUNW2LYCOMPONRNT. &cept for situations involving PVC

conditions, an absence of radar coverage or ILS fi and airports with parallel runways

when one runway is limited to use by mall aircraft (all of which are covered in

chapter 4), calculate the runway component hourly capacity as follows:

a. Select the runway-use configuration in figure 3-2 which best represents

the use of the airport during the hour of interest. To adjust for staggered

thresholds, see paragraph 4-6.

b 0 Identify fraa figure 3-2 the figure number for capacity (for C*, T, and E).

c. Determine the percentage of Class C and D aircraft operating on the runway

cwonent and calculate the mix index.

d 0 Determine percent arrivals (PA).

e. Determine haurly capacity base (C*).

f betermine the percentage of touch and go operations during VPR operations

and de&mine the touch and go factor (T). During IFR operations, T will be 1.00.

9 Determine the location of exit taxiways (measured from the threshold at

the appioach end of the runway) and determine the exit factor (B).

h 0 Calculate the hourly capacity of the runway caqmnent by the following

equation:

Hardycapacity of the runway camponent - C**T*E

Chap 3

Par 3-l 13
AC 150/5060-S

OW?EPUT

g/23/83

INPUT NEEDED

1 0 Haxly capacity of runway

cvnent

See: paragraph 3-2

appendix 2 (figure A2-1)

2 l Hourly capacity of taxiway

component

See: paragraph 3-3

appendix 2 (figure A2-2)

3 0 Hourly capacity of gate group

components

See: paragraph 3-4

appendix 2 (figure A2-3)

4 0 Airport hourly capacity

See: paragraph 3-5

appendix 2 (figure A2-4)

5 0 Annual service volume

See: paragraph 3-6

appendix 2 (figure A2-5)

6 0 Hourly delay to aircraft on rummy

component

See: paragraph 3-7

appendix 2 (figure A2-6)

7 l Daily delay to aircraft on rummy

caaponent

See: paragraphs 3-8 and 3-9

appendix 2 (figure8 A2-7,

and A2-8)

8 0 Annual delay to aircraft on runway

CcrarpOnent

See: paragraph 3-10

appendix 2 (figure A2-9)

8. Ceiling and visibility (VFR, IFR, or .

=I

b

C:

Rmvay-use configuration

Aircraft mix

d 0 Percent arrivals

e. Percent tauch and go

f 0 mit taxiway locations

a. Intersecting taxiway lacation

b0 lhrnway operations rate

c. Aircraft mix on runway being

crossed

a. Number and type of gates in each

gab grarp

b 0 Gate mix

c. Gate occupancy times

Capacity outputs from 1, 2, and

3 above

a. Hourly capacities of runway coqonent

b. Wcurence of operating conditions

a. Hourly demand

b l Hourly capacity of the runway

cvnent

c. Ikmand profile factor

8. Haxly delay

b 0 Hourly demand

c. Hourly capacity

aa Annual demand

b0 Dnily delay

c. Hourly demand

d 0 Hourly capacities

e. Eercent vFR/IFR conditions

f l Ihrmmy-use configuration

National Climatic anter, Ambevilh, North Carolina

Air Traffic Contra1 mr: record8

Offical Airline duiderr

Airport Hmagemmt

Observations

Figure 3-l. Information required f0c C8paCity and delay cdlCUlatiCXM3

14

QIap 3

Par 3-2
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

3-3. HOURLY CAPACITY OF THE TAXIMAY COMPONENT. Calculate the hourly capacity of a

. . taxiway component as follows:

a. Determine the distance frown the runway end (start of takeoff roll) to the

taxiway crossing.

b. Determine the runway operations rater Leo8 the demand being accommodated

on the runway being crossed.

C. Calculate the mix index of the runway being crossed.

d 0 Determine the hourly capacity of the taxiway crossing.

(1) Use figure 3-66 when the crossed runway accommodates arrivals or

mixed operations.

(2) Use figure 3-67 when the crossed runway accommodates only departures

and touch and 90%.

3-4. HOURLYCAE'ACITY OF GATEGROUP COIWMENTS. Calculate the hourly gate group

capacities as follows: .

a. Determine the number of gate groups and the number of gates in each gate

grovp,

w

b Determine the gate mix, Leo8

each gate group.

the percent of non-widebadied aircraft using

c. Determine the percentage of gates in each gate group that can accommodate

widebodied aircraft.

d

bodied ind

Determine for each gate group the average gate occupancy time for widenon-widebodied aircraft.

e. When widebodied aircraft are served, calculate the gate occupancy ratio

(R) by the following equation:

R - Average gate occupancy t3.m for widebodied aircraft

Average gate occupancy th for non-widebodied aircraft

When widebodied aircraft are not served, R equals 1.00.

f 0 Calculate the hourly capacity of each gate group by use of figure 3-68.

3-5. AIRPORT HOURLY CAPACITY. Calculate the airport hourly capacity as follows:

a. Calculate the hourly capacities of the runway, taxiway, and gate grasps

components and determine the hourly demands on each.

b

demand iy

CalmUte the demand ratio for each cauponent by dividing the component

the runway component demand.

Chap 3

Par 3-3 15
AC 150/5060-S g/23/83

c. Calculate the component quotients by dividing each cvnents capacity by

its demand ratio.

d Identify the airport hourly capacity, i.e.8

in c above.

the lowest quotient calculated

3-6. ANNuALsBmICEvoLuMB (Asv) 0 Calculate the ASV as follows:

a. Calculate the. weighted hourly capacity (h) for the runway cenent as

follows:

(1) Identify the different runway-use configurations used over the course

of a year.

(2) Determine the percent of tim each runway-use configuration is in

U8e (PI through Pn). Include those times when the hourly capacity is zero, i.e.,

the weather conditions are below airport minimums or the airport is closed for other

reasons. If a runway-use configuration is used less than 2 percent of the time,

that time may be credited to another runway-use configuration.

(3) Calculate the hourly capacity for each runway-use configuration

(Cl through Cn).

(4) Identify the runway-use configuration that provides the maximum capacity. Generally, this configuration is also the configuration most frequently used.

(5) Divide the hourly capacity of each runway-use configuration by the

hourly capacity of the runway-use configuration that provides the maximum capacity.

(6) Determine the ASV weighting factor (Wl through Wn) for each runwayuse configuration from Table 3-l.

Table 3-l. ASV mightzing Factors

Percent of I

Vkighting Factors I

capacity

El-90 1 3

-66-80 15 I2 I8 1

15 1

O-50 I25 I'4 I

16 I

25 I

16

chap 3

Par 3-5
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

(7) Calculate the weighted hourly capacity (Cw) of the runway component

by the following equation:

(Pl°Cl'Wl)+(P2'C2'W2)+...+(PnoCnoWn)

cw 3

(Pl'Wl)+(P2'W2)+...+(Pn"Wn)

b

peak moo&h

Calculate the ratio of annual demand to average daily demand during the

(D). Typical annual demand to average daily demand ratios are provided in

table 3-2.

c. Calculate the ratio of average daily demand to average peak hour demand

during the peak month (H). Typical average daily to average peak hour demand ratios

are provided in table 3-2.

Table 3-2. Typical Demand Ratios

* 7

Mix Index Daily (D) Hourly (H)

4

O-20 280-310 7-11

*

21-50 300-320 10-13

51-180 310-350 1145

& I L

d 0 Calculate ASV by the following equation:

A&l = CgDmH

3-7. HOURLYDEZAYTOAIRCRAFTONTHERUNWAYCOMPONENT, Hourly delay calculations

described in this paragraph apply to those hours when the hourly demand does not

exceed the hourly capacity of the runway component. For those haurs when the hourly

demand exceeds the hourly capacity of the runway component, paragraph 3-9 calculations apply. Calculate hourly delay as follows:

a. Calculate the hourly capacity of the runway cvnent for the specific

hour of interest.

b Identify fran figure 3-2 the figure number for delay (for the arrival

delay &ex (ADI) and the departure delay index (DDI)).

c. Identify the hourly demand (HD) and the peak 15 minute demand (Q)

on the runway component.

d 0 Calculate the ratio of hourly demand to hourly capacity (D/C).

e. Determine the arrival delay index (ADI) and departure delay index (DDI).

Chap 3

Par 3-6 17
AC 150/5060-S g/23/83

f Calculate the arrival delay factor (ADF) and departure delay factor (DDF)

by the f&owing equations: .

ADF - ADI.(D/C)

DDF - DDP(D/C)

9 0 Calculate the demand profile factor (DPF) by the follawing equation:

NOTE : Airports with a high percentage of air carrier activity normally have a DPF

of 50 percent. Airports with a high percentage of general aviation activity normally have a DPF in the 30 to 35 percent range.

h Calculate the average delay for arriving aircraft (DAHA) and departing

aircraft. (DAHD) figure 3-69.

i. Calculate hourly delay (DTH) by the following equation:

DTH = HD(PA"DAHA+(lOO-PA)oDAHD)/lOO

3-8. DAILY DELAY TO AIRCRAE'T ON THE RUNWAY COMPONENT WHEN !l?HE D/C RATIO IS 1.0 OR

LESS FOREXH HOUR. Calculate the daily delay as follows:

a. For each hour@ calculate the hourly delay to aircraft on the runway

component.

b

for each.of

Calculate the delay for the time period in question by summing the delay

the hours.

3-9. DAILY DELAY To AIRCRAET ON THE RUNKAY COMPONENT WHEN !l!HE D/C RATIO IS GREATER

THAN 1.0 FOR ONE OR B!DRE HOURS. Calculate the daily delay as follows:

a. Identify the saturated time periods. A saturated period consists of

the consecutive hours when demand exceeds capacity (termed the overload phase) plus

the subsequent hour(s) required to accommodate the residual demand (termed the

recovery phase).

b. For each saturated period (overload plus recovery phase) I calculate the

delay to aircraft as follows:

(1) Determine the duration of the overload phase.

(2) Calculate the hourly AD/C ratio during the overload phase, i.e., the

sum of the hourly demands during the overload phase divided by the sum of the hourly

capacities during the overload phase.

(3) Determine the percent of arrivals (PAS) for the saturated (overload

plus recovery) period.

(4) Determine the AD1 and the DDI for the saturated (overload plus

recovery) period.

18

Chap 3

Par 3-7
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

(5) Calculate the arrival delay factor (ADF) and departure delay factor

(DDF) using the following equations:

ADF * ADI.(AD/C)

DDF = DDP(AD/C)

(6) Determine the average delay per arrival (DASA) and per departure

(DASD) during the saturated (overload plus recovery) period from figure 3-70.

(7) Calculate the delay in the saturated period (DTS) by the following

equation:

m?s= (HD1+HD2+... +mn).(PAS.DASA + (lOO-PAS)DASD)/l(& where

HDl through HDn = Hourly demand during hours 1 through n of the saturated period.

c. Determine for each unsaturated hour the delay in accordance with the procedures in paragraph 3-E.

d

delay;.

Calculate the total daily delay by summing the saturated and unsaturated

3-101 ANNUAL DELAY TO AIRCRAF!P ON THE RUNWAY COMPONEN!C. The following procedure

uses 24 representative days, one VFR and one IFR for each calander month. Other

increments of time may be selected. If the airport has considerable fluctuation in

bperations during the week, or if a more precise delay determination is needed, one

representative VFR and one representative IFR day should be used for each day of the

week. Variation in seasonal traffic will require repetition of these computations

for each season. Airports which have consistent patterns of -rations throughout

the week and year require fewer computations.

a. Convert annual demand to average day demand for each month.

(1) Distribute the annual demand to the 12 calendar months to account for

seasonal variations in traffic.

(2) Devebp average day demand by dividing the monthly demands by the

number of days in the respective month.

b

demand..

Adjust the average day demand to account for differences in VFR and IFR

(1) Determine from mather records the percent of the time that IFR and

PVC operating conditions prevail (%IFR).

(2) Determine fran traffic records the percent IFR (and PVC) demand to

VFR demand (%IFR demand).

Chap 3

Par 3-9 19
AC 150/5060-S g/23/83

(3) Calculate the representative VFR day demand (VFR demand) and repre- .

sentative IFR day demand (IFR demand) by the following equations: .

VFRdemand= (Average day demand)

l-%IFR(l-%IFR demand/lOO)/lOO

IFR demand = VFR demand . %IFR demand/100

c. From historical data, develop a breakdown of hourly demand for the representative day(s).

d . Calculate the representative daily delays.

e. Determine monthly delay by multiplying the representative daily delays by

the number of days it represents and summing these quotients.

f . Sum the monthly delays. .

3-11. HouRLYDEWiND ~~PONDINGTOASPECIFIEDLEVBLOFAVERAGEHOORLY DELAY.

Determine the hourly demand which corresponds to a stipulated average level of delay

by trial and error, i.e., using a graphical plotting of delay versus demand.

20

Chap 3

Par 3-10
AC 150/5060-5 CHG 2

%&a

z

‘9

5-4

%U

-

w

-

3-u

Y-f;

-

Y-w

-

EM

3-57

-

Y-4

-

I-J@

-

%9

s-9

S-i

-

s-91

3.91

S-IO

-

s-91

CII

0’ re IQ.

n 150 n 90’

0. ?b 18.

II ’

0’ To If’

II’

=F=-0.

\n

f2’

If’ Y

chap 3

Figure 3-s. mnway-use diagrams

j

21 (and 22)

i

I
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-5

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C'

VALS

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D)

TOUCH & GO FACTOR T

b 1

Percent Nix Index--

Touch L Go Percent (C+3D) TOUCH L GO PACTOR T b

0 0 to 180 1.00

1 to 10 oto 70 1.04

11 to 2 0 oto 7 0 1.10

2 1 to 3 0 oto 4 0 1.20

31 to 40 oto 10 1.31

41 to 5 0 oto 1 0 1.40

To

1.

2 .

c’ x T x E = Hourly Capacity

3 .

4.

EXIT FACTOR E

detenolne Exit Factor E:

Determine exit range for appropriate mix index from table below

?or arrival runways, determine the average number of exits(N) wh

are: (a) within appropriate exit range, and (b) separated by at

least 750 feet

If N is 4 or more, Exit Pactor - 1.00

If N ais less than 4, datemine Exit Factor

l ppropriate mix index and percent arrivals

from table below for

ich

Nix In&x-- Exit Range EXIT FACTOR E

Percent (C+3D) (?eet from 40% Arrival8 508 Arrfvai8 608 Arrivals

thre8hold) ' N-O N-1 N-2 N-O N-1 N-2 N-O h'=l N-2

or 3 or 3 or 3

oto 2 0 2000 t o 4000 0.72 0.87 0.94 0.70 0.86 0.94 0.67 0.84 0.92

2 1 to so 3000 t o 5500 0.79 0.86 0.94 0.76 0.84 0.93 0.72 0.81 0.90

51 to 80 3500 t o 6500 0.79 0.86 0.92 0.76 0.83 0.91 0.73 0.81 0.90

8 1 t o 120 5000 t o 7000 0.82 0.89 0.93 0.80 0.88 0.94 C.77 0.86 0.93

, 121 t o 180 5500 t o 7500 0.86 0.94 0.98 0.82 0.91 0.96 0.79 0.91 0.97

FIGURE 3-3, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: 1,54 FOR v% CONDITIONS.

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C’

n

0

I:VALS

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT (C+3D)

c

TOUCH & GO FACTOR T

T = 1.00

I# C’ x t x E = Hourly Capacity

EXIT FACTOR E

To detemfne Exit Factor E:

1. Detemlne exit range for appropriate mix index from table below

2. ?Or arrival runweye, determine the average number Of exits(N) which

are: (a) within appropriate exit range, and (b) separated by at

least 750 feet

3. If N is 4 or more, Exit Factor - 1.00

1. If N ie less than 4, determine Exit Factor from table tselow for

l pproprlate mix index and percent arrivals

Mix Index-- Exit Range EXIT FACTOR E

Percent(C+3D)

(?eet from 4 4OI Arrival8 508 Arrival8

threshold) N-0

I oto 20 2000 to 4000

21 to 50 3000 to 5500

51 to 80 3500 to 6500 0.75 0.84 C.92 3.75 0.84 Il.92 1).7S'1f.94 !,.d

81 to 120 so00 to iooo 0.80 r).w7 0.94 9.t-30 f!.R7 c-94 O.hf’ 7t.r)~1 0.34

t 121 to 180 . 5500 to 7500 L0.94,1.00,1.3C 1.H: 0.93 ;.q7 9.RJ 9.9% * C.911 -4

r’l CURE 3-4. YOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: J2,73,87,88 TOK VI--H i0NDlr10~5,

chap 3

23
AC 150/5060-5 g/23/83

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C'

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D)

.

TOUCH & GO FACTOR T

I t

I ’

Percent Mix Index--

?ouch & Go PercentK+30) TOUCH L GO FACTOR T

0 0 to 180 1.00

I I

41 to so oto 10 1.20

1

C’xT x E = Hourly Capacity

EXIT FACTOR E

To determine Exit Factor E:

1. Determine exit range for appropriate mix Index from table below

2. For arrival runways, determine the averaqe number of exits(N) which

are: (a) within appropriate exit ranqe, and (b) 8eparated by at

lea8t 750 feet .

3. If N i8 4 or more, Exit Factor - 1.00

4. If N i8 lc88 than 4, determine Exit Factor from table below for

appropriate nix index and percent arrivals

Exit Ranqe EXIT FACTOR E

Mix Index--

Percent(C+30) (Feet from 40s Arrival8 50% Arrivals 60 Q Arrival8

threcrhold) N-O N-1 N-2 N-O N-1 N-2 N-O N-l N-2

or 3 or 3 I or 3

oto 2 0 2000 t o 4000 0.62 0.79 0.90 0.62 0.79 0.90 0.62 0.79 0.90

21 to 5 0 3000 t o 5500 0.72 0.83 0.93 0.72 0.83 0.93 0.72 0.83 0.93

51 to 8 0 3500 t o 6500 0.75 0.84 0.92 0.75 0.84 0.92 0.75 0.84 0.92

81 to 120 5000 t o 7000 0.80 0.87 0.94 0.80 0.87 0.94 0.80 0.87 0.94

121 t o 180 5500 to 7500 0.85 0.96 0.98 0.83 0.93 0.97 0.83 0.93 0.97,

FIGURE 3-5, H O URLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY - USE DIAGRAM NO. 3 FOR '\(Ffl CONDITIONS .

'HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C"

VALS

6

zt:

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D)

c +

; Percent Mix Index--

: Touch C Go Percent(C*30) TOUCH b GO FACTOR T

0 0 to 180 ;L.oo1 t o 10 oto 7 0 1.02

11 t o 2 0 oto 7 0 1.04

2 1 t o 3 0 oto 4 0 1.08

31 t o 4 0 oto 1 0 1.13

41 to so oto 1 0 1.17

0 ..---

C’xTxE = Hourty Capacity

TOUCH 8 GO FACTOR T

To1.

2 .

3.

4 .

EXIT FACTOR E

determine Etit Factor E: - -

Determine exit range for appropriate mix index from table below

?or arrival runvaym, determine the rveraqe number of exits(N) which

are: (a) within appropriate exit range, and (b) 8eparated by at

lea8t 750 feet

If N 18 i or more, Exit Factor - 1.00

If N 18 1088 than 4, determine Exit Factor from table Lou for

appropriate nix index and percent arrivals

Percent(C+30)

Exit Range

(Feet from

thre8hold)

2000 to 4000

3000 to 55oc

51 to 8 0 3500 t o 6500 0.75 0.84 0.92 0.75 0.~4 0.92 0.75

81 to 120 5000 to 7000 D.80 0.87 0.94 0.80 0.81 0.94 0.80

. 121 to 180 5500 to 7500 0.83.0.93 0.97 0.83 0.93 0.97 CI.A3

F 1 GURE ‘j-5. YOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: k,:T ,?$;,&,;C FOR ‘/FR CONDITIONS,

Chap 3
13;'1/95 AC 150/5060-5 CHG 2

b

C ‘XTxE = Hourly Capacity

w .

EXIT FACTOR E

To 3otermtne Zxft Factor E:

1. Detmrmrne exit r4n9* for spproprrate -1x ?nC8x fr3m c.aalo Srlou

2. tar l rival nmrqa.Jotemlne znm rvuaqm timber 3f exttr(s; 4p.t:3

arm : ia) vitnln Appropriate exit ranqr. and :b) ioprraced 3y SC

ler8t ?SO feet

3. If S 18 4 at *re. exit ?aczar - 1.20

4. If Y L8 LO80 Nan 4. Cettmine 2x1: ?8ctor fram table =eiCw far

l pproprtaw .-1x :ndax and pettenc arrivals

MIX tndex--

Percrnt tC* 301

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

MIX INDEX -- PEXCE!dT K+3D>

b . i .

FIGURE 3-7. HOURLY C+,p,4CIT’Y CF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NO. 5 FOR VFR CONDITIONS*

f

f

TOUCH & GO FAXTO!? T

, *

Pemnt Mix !n&x-- touch 1 Go Pmrcont(C*301 I

toc::i b GO ?ACTOR t

,

0 0 to A80 l.JO

1 to LO 0-a 70 L.J2

11 EO to Oto 70 1.2s

21 to 30 oto 40 1.38

31 to 40 Oto LO l.Ll

41 to so 0 to 10 1.14

. J

. . . -

l .

C’xT x E = Hourly Capacity

*

EXIT FACTOR E

1

To detmrrtne Exit ?actor C:

1. Oet8rrina *x&t r8nqe for tpproprlatt mix rndox ftm cable 3mLw

2. lor arriv81 runuay8, ~et~rminr cne swraqr 3uanbrr 3f l xlt8tNl unl3

Am: ia) within rppropriatt oxit turqa, l d tb) separated by AC

ler8t 750 t**t

3. If S 18 4 or aore. txtt Factor - 1.30

4. If 3 i8 h8rn t.nrn b. 5ettrmtnr Cxl: ?actor iron table kior for

l ppruprtatm a%x ?ndex and mrctnc l rrtvaL#

, .

ExLt X-n90 c x:t tXcY3.9 z

.Icix Lndox-- !

Porcmnt fC+3D)

(?*ot from

,Y L,o : o

21 to 50

51 to 00 3soo :o 5500

.

ai t0 120

:21 '-0 :a0 5500 zo '500

. .

FIGURE 34. iiCU;iLY CAPACITY CF %JNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS. 7, 8, 76, 91 FCR VFR cCNDIT:CNS.

Chap 3

33
AC 150/5060-5 CHG 9, 12 11'95

f TOUCH 3 GO

FACTOR T

1

.

hrcmt Nlr :n6x-- %ucR L =o ’ hrc8nt fC~3D) TOUCN b c3 ?ACT31 Y

a J w 30 L.30 b

I L to ;o 3to 70 I

L. 34 I

Ll -w 20 ow 70 1. LO

21 to IO ow 40 1.20

11 -w 40 ow 10 1.31

t

41 l A 50 ow 10 1.40

4 1

C’xt x E = Hourly Capacity

c

EXIT FACTOR E

1

To d*trrrin* Rtt ?actor f:

1. ootormlnr oxit t8nq8 tar 4pgroptiato Jx lndh Cron zabl* klou

2. ?ot l rrlv81 -rummy*.dotamtnruaal rrtaqon-fof l rit8tn) mic3

l r8: (8) witnln wpropriato oxit rmqo. an\ (b) eoparatrd by at

lomt no Fwt

3. If ~4 18 4 or mr8. hit tutor - 1.00

4. Ii !4 18 1808 tfmn 4, dmtorminr Exit ?8ctot from

8QQ=Qrh-=iX bdrX Wd m+C8ntl rriv818

:abh klou for

1

rrlr :&8x--

fxrt knq* et r: ?ACT2R f 1

Porcmnt(C~lD) (tort ttsr

chrr8halfl~

408 Arr;valaI 548 Arrivala 1 53% .wravais

N-0 n-1 -3-z

r

I I

N-0 n-1 y-2 .

or 3 or 1

Jco 20 2000 to 4000

L?21 to280SSOQ to?SOO0.1s3.913.90 0.91..-.,,.~--a0.31 3.37.0.79rJ.39.+

21 to so ~000 to 5500 0 ,:72 0:37~0:34 j

79 0 36 3 94 0 '6 0 94 0 31 0 '2 0 dL 3 30

11Sl :o so to 3soo to 6500 0.79 :20 5000 O.a6 0.32 0.76co 0.33 0.31 7000.73 0.31 'Z-30 LA

0.83 0.19 0.33 o.ao 0.37 0.94 0.77 0.36

,

c

FGURE 3-9. HOURLY CAPACITY OF 2lJNWAY-USE OlAGiiAM NOS. 9,56,58 FOR VFR CONDITIONS.

4

f

l

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C’ TOUCH 8 GO FACTOR T

.

ToucJlboo hrcont(C*10~ roucll 6 to ?&CT01 T

A.jO

1 to 10 oto 70 1.04

11 co 20 oto 70 1.:0

21 to 30 ow 60 1.20

IVAtS 31 to 40 0 to 10 1.31

61 to so oto 10 1.40

4

C’xTx E = Hourly Capacity

.

EXIT FACTOR E

1

To d8tarmino hit Pactor L:

1. Omtrmine exit ranqo Lor 8ppropr:ato l :X in&x Zra table below

2. for &trim1 nmny8. &t*rrin8 tb rvur8qm 3-r 3F l xltrW1 whlcn

arm: (aI vlthin l pproprirto exit range, and 031 ropar8tod by 8c

laaat 750 coot

I. tf n 18 4 or mm, txlt t8ctor - 1.00

4. Xi N 18 ?888 thrn 4. brtmrmirm bit two+ fro0 t8blr 5010~ ior

appropriate mix ln49ox bad pmremt 4tr;vala

r

0 120 140 160 180

RIX INDEX -- PE3CEIY-r K+TD>

.

FIGURE 340. HOURLY CAPACITY OF 2UNWAY-USE DAG2AM NOS. 12. i&71 FC>R VFR CONCIT(CNS.

36 Chap 3
1211i95 AC 150/3060-5 CHG 1

IVALS

201

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D>

II

r

I,

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C’ t

4

TOUCH 8 GO FACTOR T

340

300

260

IVAtS

Potcent nlr Index-- Youen b 20 Porcont fCb30) TOUCH b co tACTOR T

, 0 0 ~0 180 1.00

1 to 10 Oto 10 1.33

11 to 20 Oto 70 1.0s

21 co IO oto 40 1.11

31 eo 40 Oto 10 1.20

41 co 50 oco 10 1.26

, 4

4 l

1

Cí x T x E = Houiiy Capacity \

c

220 EXIT FACTOR E

YO frtmrminr Exit ?actor E:

180 1. 3otomam l rlt rrnqr tot appropriate nix lndrx Irar table klow

2. tar drrlval runwaya. d8t*nnlnm cho rvoraqo nmmr of l xtt~(Nl unich

dro: (a) vltnln l pprogrlaca exit ranqr. and lb) rmparatod 5y l e

140 toast ‘SO Ieec

3. If ?I 18 4 or axm, Zxit tdctor - 1.30

4. Xf r( i8 Lea8 rhdn 4. dot8mino =x1: frctor from :aala 301au for

100

l ppropriarm ntr Lndrx and parcent rrrlvala 4

60, j /

r I

I mix fndrx--

txLt Rdnqe

(?wc Iram

I

Porcmnt fC* ID) :nrrsnOLd) ' yIo

1 -l-,0

!

20

1 f 2: ‘,3 sa

0 20 40 SO 80 NO 120 PO 160 180 i

I 51 ‘0 30

MfX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D) [ 3L zo ::fl

‘** ..I mm.d : ar)

L d .

C ‘XTxE = Hourly Capacity

l

EXIT FACTOR E

?a 3rter3lne bxat Vector 0:

L. Detexntrne l xrt tm19r to< appropriate %hc indmx iron, zable klav

a . Pot atr:val runways. deeermine pae avrraqe mmBmr of ertt8(N) vhfc% drm : (a) vlt3fn approprfate exit ranqe, and :bl repdratmd 3y re Lor8t :so fame

1. If N 18 4 or mm, Zxlt ?actor - 1.00

4. If N 18 leaa c,han 4, determine Exit Faettr from :abh %low for

l ppmprtat8 aaxLndax and potcent l rriv8ls

FIGURE 3-11. HOURLY CAPACim OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS. 13,15 FOR VFR CONDITIONS.

FIGURE 3-12. ktOURtY Ci4PACil-Y OF XJNWAY-USE OlAG?Xvl NOS. X,79,94 FCR VFR CONDITIONS.

Chap 3

37
AC150/5060-j CHG 2

13Ai95

C’xf x E = Hourly Capacity

3. Ii !4 18 4 or znorm, Exit ?actor * 1.30

4. It 9 i8 188s th8n 4, decemine Exit Factor from ‘,&La bei- for

wpropri8cx mL.x index and porcrnt arrivals

Crlt R8nqr 2X : . ?A,‘723 c 1

Mix IndexPercrnt f c*IO)

FIGURE3013, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE CIAG2AM NOS. l&21,22 FOR VFR CONDlTIONS.

I

I 9 .

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE c' TOUCH 8 GO FACTOR T

f 3

h-c nix Xndex-- -Lb hreontfCe3D) TOUCH b co tA:toR T

420 I I

0 0 co 180 1.30

L to 10 oco 70 1.03

380 11 to 20 oco 70 1.05

2l to JO oto 4 0 I.11

IVALS

340

31 to 40 oto &O 1.20

41 to so oto 10 1.26

.

L300

.

C’xTxE5 Hourly Capacity

.

EXIT FACTOR E

% deterrfnr txlt ?actor !I:

1. kt8rmirn arft rrnqr for l pproprtrto nix indo% from tab10 381~

2 . par 4rr;vrl runwry*.

d2

3mt8mLna tram rvor8qr 3umoor 3t l xtrr(W mien

8-r 18) witfiin l pproprtaco exit rwrqe, and :bl repaiatod 37 at

C?lriO

108M 730 f-C

z 3. XI II F8 4 or Ioro. txit F8ccor - 1.00

=

4. If I) L8 haa tn8n 4, 3otenmlne Cx:t ?actor Cram :aolr *Aor ior

100

l wmsvriaea mix lndax and percent arrivals

, 4

Cat knqo cl:? tA;flfl c

mix In&=-- (toot irx ' 408 ArrivaLs : SO8 Art%-18 ' 3~8 Arrtvala !

1 60 kt#nc tc* 30) thromhold) ’ N-9 ’, s-1

/

jzf2,j U-O i ~-1 ,o;23i u-0 i 3-A i;;J?i

3to 20 2000 :o 1000

20 21 to so 3000 ',o 5500

0 20 40 60 80 100 20 140 16il 180 51 to JO IS00 :o 5500

MIX INDEX -- PE3CEN-T K+3l> 81to ;70

!

so00 to '000

121 to :10

L b

FjGURE J-14. HCURLy CAp,ACin CF ZUNWAY-USE i3IAG;WM NOS. 19,23.77,78,32.33 FOR VFR CONDITIONS*

28 . Chap 3
lWi95 AC lSOiSO60-5 CHG 2

20. i 1 I ! I /

0 20 40 60 80 100 l20 140 160 180

MIX INDEx -- PEKEN K+3D>

P.ZC8Bnt !4fX :ndox--

I

1

touch b 70 Porcsnt (Cb3DI f33CH i so ?hCf3R :

I

3 1 3 t o LB0 1 L.50

I 1 to :3 oto 70 1.31

11 L-0 20 O-0 7 0 1.02

21 :o I O oto 40 1.33

31 co 40 0 CD LO 1.04

41 to s o oto IO 1.35

.

C’XT x E = Hourly Capacity

.

EXIT FACTOR E

To ~1atbmfno Cxft tutor S:

1. Dmt8mine exit rmqm for l pproprlrtm atx indrx frw tabla bmlw

2 . ?or l rrtv81 tunway8. detmnlnm ehe avmraqm numbor of exit8lNJ walcn

l m: (A) within l pproprlata l xlt ranqo, and tbJ rrparatrd Sy at

haa 7so fare

3. If Y 18 4 or aorm. Salt ?8ctor - 1.00

4. :f ?( ia loam tnan 4, datenino Exit ?utor from tab10 blow for

l ppmqartata rtx index and wreont arrival8

.!4lx Index- Cxat knqe ?ACfOR

Porcmnc (C* 30) (tow cram

thr8unoid)

0 t o 20 I1 2000 I I lot 11 lot 31 I !or

:o

4000 ~0.:s(0.38~0.34~0.: ?]

Zlo.d6jO.33lO.59(0.3r16.)31

2 1 ‘Lo 5 0 3000 :o 5500 3.32 0.39 0.96 0.79 0.37 0.95 0.76 0.36 0.3s

Sl ‘-0 3 0 3500 :o 5500 0.33 0.90 0.35 0.31 0.99 0.35 0.:3 0.36 0.33

01 to :20 5000 L-O 7000 0.38 0.92 0.37 o.ar 0.30 0.3s 0.33 0.39 0.35

121 to :30 5500 ‘,o ‘SO0 c-31 0.97 i 0.39 i 0.38lO.3S a.30 0.35 0.34.0.37

FIGURE 3-15. HCURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAWAM NOS. 24,27 FOR VFR CONDITIONS.

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C'

420, T 9

380

IVALS

20, - t t

0 20 40 60 80 LOO 120 140 160 180

MIX INDEX -- PEKEHT K+3D)

TOUCH g GO FACTOR 7

Porcmt nfx :ndmx--

Touch b pa Pmrcmnt tC*3DJ TOUCH b GO PACfOl ?

.

0 0 to 180 l.dO

1 to 10 oto 70 1.01

11 -2 2 0 0-a 7 0 1.02

2 1 c o 3 0 oto b0 1.03

31 to 40 of0 10 1.04

41 to SO oto to 1.0s

Za

1.

2 .

C’ x T x E = Hourly Cawclty

3.

b.

EXIT FACTOR E

ht8nine Zxit P8ctor 3:

Dotmnm~no exit r8ngo for appropriate six fndex fra t-la klw

?or l rrlv81 .xnw&ym, dotarrinr t!m wmr8qm number?rt l xit8tN1 dh

arm: (a) within rpproprlrto oxit tango, and (bJ aqarrtod by at

lwat 7so fm*t

ff J :8 4 or sorm. Lxit ?utor - 1.00

rf !4 18 :a.8 tRan 4, dmtmrrinm fxft ?actor Cram t-la selw for

apptoprtaea six Lndox and pmrcrnt arrivala

iCS

txrt knqr tx:t ?AC~OR t

Nix :nUox-- I

Pmrcmt fC*lO) l?**t trm ’ 4OI Ur1vab

tR=munold)

FWRE3-16. HCuRL';/ CAPAC1TYOFRUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NO.26 FORVFR CONL?ITIcNS.

Chap 3 ' 39
AC 150/5060-j CHG 2 13!1:9j -4

201/

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 I.40 160 180

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D)

TOUCtf 8 GO FaCTOil T

/ a 1.30 , 1

1 to io

1 z 1::

'1.31 i

i (

11 =a to

21 co 3 0 I

at0 70 1.92

I

, 0 co 4 0 1.33 !

I 31 '-0 40 3co L O 1.34 I

41 CO 50

I

0-a L O 1.35 1

C’ x T x E = Hourly Capacity

t

EXIT FACTOR E

To c?etrxmfne Zxit Factor P:

1. 3me8rmmr l xft r8nqa fOt 4QQtOQrt&t* ?liX ffideX fB table b8LOw

2. tot l rrtvrl rwwrys. &Ce~rn~ tno 4veraqe matbot of exits(N) wt1lc3

are : (4) within l ppropriac8 l rlt rmqa. and (b) reprAted by 4t

Leaat 7fO fert

1. X .rl 18 4 or more, Cxlt ?actor - 1.30

4. ff H la :rsa zhan 4. dremrdno zxit Tactor from table below iOt

l pproprfrte mx fndex and ;orcent arrivals

HtX :ndtx--

Sxit Ranqe

Percent(C*3sf

3 co 20

21 C O 5')

. si :o 30

31 co ;20

:,tL CO :ac 5500 to 'SO0

FIGURE3017. HOURLYCAPAClrYOFRUNWAY-USEDIAGRAM NOS.28,82,97 FOR VFR CONDITIONS.

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE c'

I I I I i

20

0 20 40 60 80 iO0 129 140 160 180

RIX INDEX -- PEKENT K*3D)

TOUCH 8 GO FACTO!? T

Porc8nt (

!4fx :nd8x--

Toucn i So Porcent (C*lD) TOUCH b co PAC fOR

I 3 0 -a 180 A. 30 I 11

to :o 0 to 70 1.04

1 LL c3 20 oto 70 L.LO I

! 2: co 3 0 oto 40 1.20 !

I 31 to 40 oto LO 1.31 I

41 ‘-0 so oto LO 1.40

I 1

I

111~

4

C’ x T x E = Hourly Capacity

EXiT FACTOR E

To deeemlnm fxlt ?aetor 5:

1. 3ot*mln* l xAt ranqm for appropriate nix index Ztoa cable hiow

:. ?or srriv81 .runuryr . 2atrrmfnr the rweraqo 3umber 3,C exit8dN1 wA1;::

4re: ;4) -Ithin 4pproprtace exit rmqe, md (b) separated 3y st

Least 'SO fart

3. Lf N is 4 3r nore. Exit Factor - L.20

4 . :I !4 1s iea8 than 4, dotermine Cxlt Tacror Iram ZabLe below for

qqaropr;ate m&x Lndar &nd percent srrfvals

Percent (C-30)

FlGURE3-18. HOURLYCAPACtTYOFRUNWAY-USEaIAGilAM NO.29 FOR VFR CONDITIONS.

30 Chap 3
E/1/95 AC 150/5060-5 CHG 3

7

t

HUJR’LY CAPACITY 3ASE C’ T-0 UCH q GO F.4 C 79 2 T

1

hrcent 1 Mx .

Zndax-- YO;JC!l b 53

4x i ‘oucn L ,%a ! ?ercone :C*32) I

tAc?Ja y !

I

3 3 to iao i-20

l

1 to :o 3 to 70 1.34 I

I 380 /

LL to 20 0 to ‘0 1..' 0 I

21 to IO at0 40 1.20

IVALS 31 to 40 0 to LO 1.31

340 41 to so a to 10 I. 40

1

4

C ‘xT,x E = Hourly Capacity

\ 8

EXIT FACTOR E

to Uaeermtne 5x1: Factor f:

L

2:

DmtamLn8 ertt t8n90 for l pproprl8te six 4nder frfnm zable 30L0r

tar arrival run~ry*, dotormlnr the awcrraqr numaar of e8lt8(H) whi=ft

ara : (aJ atSin appropriate exit rqtqa, and :b)raperated ay SC

lewt 7so rert

I. If 9 ;8 4 or mor8. Zxit F8ctor - 1.30

I

= 100

b. If II 18 La88 then 4. dotominm txlt Factor from mole !a,rlow for

l pprooriate aix index and *rant atrIval*

.

cxt t aanqe fX:f FAC’f3R S

.Mx InMx--

Percent tC+30) (Feet cram 408 .\rrlvaL8 I 508 Arrtv8La I 48 Arrlvaia

~~r8mnoid)

I I

.

3-O

1

N-1 N-2 H-O n-1 t-2 N-0

I

u-1 3-l 1 or 3 or ! f . or !I

5 CO 20 2000 co 4000

20 21 c-0 50 IOCO to 5SOO

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 51 ZD 30

31 ::.D 120

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D) 1 LZ!. LO 190 55’30 ‘-0 ‘50’1

t b l

FIGURE 3-19. HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NO. 31 FOR VFR CONDITIONS.

4 l

TOUCH 8 GO FACTOR T

T = 1.00

C’ x T x E = Houtly Capacity

. .

EXIT FACTOR E

?0 datamlne Zxit fmcto~ S:

-1. Detomlno exit ranqe Cot l ppropriata *ixindexfrom t~blo *Lou

2 . tar artlve1 runways. Uotemlnr tha avcraqm xmber 3f l xit8(N) rhlc3

arm: (a) -tthin l pproprlea exlt fmqr. and lb) separated 3y at lreec f50l eec

I . tf ?( tr 4 =r more. Sxit ?actor - I.30

4. !f ?4 ir Lee0 Zhan 4. iotamlno Cxlt factor from cable ~,rlou for appropriate ,511 index and mrcent arrlvaie

a *

FIGURE 3-20. HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS. 32,33 FOR VFR CONDITIONS.

Chap 3
AC 150/5060-j CHG 2 E’Il93

.

C‘ x T x E = Hourly Capacity

EXIT FACTOR E

\

FIGURE 3.21. HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS. 34,35 FOR VFR CONDITIONS.

I .

TOUCH 8 GO FACTO3 T

r mrcent Hlx rndox-- foucn b GO ~remtfC*fO) roucn b GO IACYOR t

0 0 to ia0 l.JO

1 to 10 oto 70 1.33

11 to :a oto 70 1.39

21 to 30 oto 40 l-:4 I

l 4

C’ x T x E -= Hourly Capacity

t

EXIT FACTOR E

To 3ocrrrlno tilt Futor Z:

1. Oetefmin* *x&t rmqm for approprtrte mix h&r im table 3eLa

2. For arrival runrry8. 4mtrrmtno tar l vrraqr atplkr of oxit*Ghicn .aro: (al frrrt no

vithin l pproprtrt8 oxit tmqe. sot and (b) boparatetl by at

I. 12 ?) LB 4 or more. Exit Factor - L-00

4 . If v i* :080 than 4 . *torrine zxit tutor froa t8blo bmla for

l pproprtrtm mix h&x and pwc8nt rrrtvaA8

Porcont (C- 101

FIGURE 3-22. IiOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE !IIAGRAM NOS. 36 - 38 FOR VFR CONDITiONS.

3 2 Chap 3
g/23/83 AC 150/506&5

# . q

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C* TOUCH & GO FACTOR T

Potcat nix Index--

Touch b Cc Percent(W3D) TOUCH b GO ?ACTOR T

L

0 0 ta 180 l..OO

1 to 10 oto 70 1.03

11 to 20 OtQ 70 1.10

21 to 30 otc 40 1.18

I VALS

. .

4

III#j C’xT x E = Hourly Capacity

\ .

EXIT FACTOR E

To detwmine Exit Factor E:

1. Dotormine exit range for appropriate mix index from table below

2. ?or arrival runways,~ determine the average number of exits(N) which

are: (a) within appropriate exit range, and (b) separated by at

laa8t 750 feet

3. If N is 4 or more, Exit Factor - 1.00

4. If N is less than 4, determine Exit Factor from table below for

appropriate mix index and percent arrivals

Exit Range EXIT ?ACTOR E

nix Index--

Porc8nt(C+3D) (Feet from ' 40% Arrival8 50% Arrivals 6OB Arrivals

threshold) N-0 N-1 N-2 N-O N-1 N-2 N-O N-l N-2 .

or 3 or 3 or 3

oto 20 2000 to 4000 0.76 0.88 0.94 0.72 0.86 0.94 0.64 0.82 0.93

21 to 50 3000 to 5500 0.83 0.90 0.96 0.80 0.88 0.95 0.72 0.83 0.93

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 51 to 80 3500 to 6500 0.85 0.91 0.95 0.82 0.89 0.95 0.75 0.84 0.92

81 to 120 5000 to 7000 0.89 0.93 0.97 0.87 0.9.l 0.96 0.81 0.87 0.94

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D) , 121 to 180 5500 to 7500' 0.94 0.98 0.99 0.92 0.97 0.99 0.89 0.96 0.98,

*

FIGURE 3-23, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRA!! NO. 39 FOR V% CONDITIONS,

P 4 * 4

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE c' TOUCH 8 GO FACTOR T

hromnt nix Index--

muchbco Percent(W3D) TOUCH L GO ?ACTOR T

0 0 to 180 1.00

1 to 10 oto 70 1.03

11 +o 20 otc 70 1.10

21 to 30 otc 40 1.18

hI1~

C@ x T x E = Hourly Capacity

EXIT FACTOR-E

4

m brtorrine Exit ?actor tr

1. Dotenrlnooxit tango for l pproprhto alx index from table below

2. ?or arrival runways, determine tha l wrago nUmbOr of oxits which

arms (4 within appropriate l xlt rango 8 8nd (b) l oparatod by at

loamt 750 bet

3. 1t.N is 4 or more, Exit ?actor - 1.00

4. If IV 18 loco than 4, detarmlne Exit Factor from table below for

appmpriato mix in&x and percent l rrivalr

, .

Mix fndox-- Exit Ran98 RXIT ?ACTOR t

1

Porcont (C+3D) (F8et frost 408 Arrival8 50% Arrival8 608 Arrivals

threshold) ' N-O N-1 N-2 N-O N-1 N-2 N-O N-l N-2

or 3 or 3 I or 3.

oto 2 0 2000 to 4000 0.76 0.88 0.94 0.72 0.86 0.94 0.64 0.82 0.93

21 tc 50 3000 to 5500 0.83 0.90 0.96 0.80 0.88 0.95 0.72 0.83 0.93

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 51 to 80 3500 to 6500 0.85 0.91 0.95 0.82 0.89 0.95 0.75 0.84 0.92

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D) 121 0to 120 to8 5500 to 7500 0.98 0.97 5000 to 7000 0.89 0.93 0.97 0.87 0.91 0.96 0.81 0.87 0.94

-0.94 0.99.0.92

0.99 0.89

0.96-0.98

h e

FIGURE 3-24. HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NO. 40 FOR VFR CONDITIONS,

Chap 3

33
AC 150/5060-S g/23/83

m .

H’OURLY CAPACITY BASE G’ TOUCH & GO FACTOR T

.

Porcent Mix In&x--

Percent(C+3D) TOUCR b GO ?ACTOR T

420 Touch b Go 1

0 0 to 180 1.00

1 to 10 oto to 1.03

380 11 to 20 oto 70 1.10

21 to 30 oto 40 1.18

-PERCENT ARRI VALS

1 1

I I I 1

I ! ! ,

lIII# C* x T x E = Hourly Capacity

To detwmine Exit Factor k:

l . D8temine exit range for appropriate rfx in&x frrolr table below

2. tar arrival rumfays, daterrine the average numbor of oxits which

are: (a) vithln appropriate exit range, and (b) separated by at

least 750 fe8t

3. If N is 4 or aoro, Exit Pactor - 1.00

4. If N is less than 4, d&ermine Exit ?actor froa table klaw for

appropriate six h&x and percent arrival8

?

Exit Range EXIT ?ACTOR t

nix Index-- SOU Arrivals 60% Arrivals

.

Percant(C+3D) (F-t from 408 Arrivals

threshold) ' N-O N-1 N-2 N-O N-1 N-2 N-O N-1 N-2

or 3 or 3 or 3

oto 20 2000 to 4000 0.75 0.88 0.94 0.72 0.86 0.93 0.69 0.84 0.92

a1 to so 3000 to 5500 0.82 0.89 0.96 0.79 0.87 0.95 0.77 0.86 0.95

. 51 to 80 3500 to 6500 0.84 0.90 0.95 0.81 0.88 0.94 0.79 0.87 0.94

81 to 120 so00 to 7000 0.88 0.92 0.96 0.86 0.90 0.9s 0.8s 0.90 0.96

NIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D) 121 to 180 ~~00 to 7500 0.92 0.96 0.97 0.89 0.94 0.96 0.90 0.96 0.98

c w

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C* TOUCH 8 GO FACTOR T

Percat nix In&x--

' Touch b Go Parcant(C+3D) TOUCH l GO ?ACTOR T

0 0 +o 180 1.00

. 1tolO oto 70 1.04

11 to 20 oto 70 1.10

21 to 30 oto 40 1.20

IVALS . 31 to 40 oto 10 1.31.

! 41 tq 50 oto 10 i.40

.

4

hrnI# C” x T x E = Hourly Capacity

.

EXIT FACTOR E

To d8toraina ExitFactor E:

1. Dotoraine mxit ranga for appropriate mix in&x from tabla klou

2. ?or arrival runways, datorrirm tha average odor of exits(N) which

arm: (a) uithin appropriate axit range, and (b) separated by at lmast 750 foot

3. If N is 4 or aore, txit ?actor - 1.00

4. If n is 1088 th8n 4, dmt8rdno txit Factor frum table klou for

approprlat8 six in&x and pmrcont arrivals

\ d

EXIT ?ACTOR t

nix Index-- Exit Rang8

lWrcant(C+3D) Woe+ frjr ' 4oa ~tri~818 so@ mrivala I 6Oa Arrivals

threshold) ' N-O IS-1 N-2 N-O -1' N-2 W-0 W-1 M-2

. or 3 or 3 or 3

oto 20 2000 to 4000 0.72 0.87 0.94 0.70 0.86 0.94 0.67 0.84 0.92

21 to so 3000 to 5500 0.79 0.86 0.94 0.76 0.84 0.93 0.72 0.81 0.90

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 51 to 80 3500 to 6SO0 0.79 0.86 0.92 0.76 0.83 0.91 0.73 0.81 0.90

81 to 120 SO00 to 7000 0.83 0.89 0.93 0.80 0.87 0.94 0.77 0;86 0.93 MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D) 121 to 180 SSOO to 7500 0.85 0.93 0.98 0.81 0.91 0.97 0.78 0.89 0.97,

d

.

EXIT FACTOR E

- I l Ië

FIGURE 3-25, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY - USE DIAGRAM NO, ,41 FOR VFR CONDITIONS,

FIGURE 3-25, H OURLY CAPACITY O F RUNWAY - USE DIAGRAM NO , 42 FOR VFR CONDITIONS,
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C*

YALS

NIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D)

TOUCH & CO FACTOR T

.

Pomnt Mix Index--

Touch L Go Percwit(C+3D) TOUCH L GO FACTOR T

0 0 to 180 1.00

EXIT FACTOR E

Exit Range . EXIT

Nix In&x--

FACTOR E

Forcmt (C+3D)

(F-t froa 40% Arrival8 SOB Arrival8 60% Arrivals

threshold) N-O N-l N-2 N-0 N-1 N=2 N-O N-l N-2

or 3 or3 or3

oto 2 0 2000 to 4000 0.86 0.88 0.94 0.80 0.85 0.93 0.71 0.83 0.93

21 to 5 0 3000 to 5500 0.84 0.91 0.98 0.71 0.85 0.92 0.71 0.85 0.92

51 to 80 3SO0 to 6500 0.81 0.91 0.97 0.76 0.85 0.91 0.75 0.84 0.91

81 to 120 5000 to 7000 0.83 0.90 0.95 0.80 0.86 0.92 0.80 0.87 0.92

121 to 180 5500 to 7500 0.93 0.99 1.00 0.84 0.94 0.98 0.85 0.94 0.98

FIGURE 3-27, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: 43,49 FOR VFR CONDITIONS.

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C*

IVALS

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D)

I TOUCH 8 GO FACTOR T I I t

--- 1 I

I ’ Pomnt nix xnd8x--

TOUCh4GO PorcontR!+3D)

TOUCH 6 GO ?ACTOR T

0 0 to 180 1.00

1 t o 10 oto 7 0 1.03

11 to 2 0 oto 70 1.10

21 to 30 oto 40 1.17

31 t o 4 0 oto 10 1.28

4 1 to 5 0 oto 10 1.36

C"xT x E = Hourly Capacity

EXIT FACTOR E

'PO dotormlno txit Factor E: .

1. Dotmaine oxit tango for appropriate mix Index iron table &elou

2. ?or arrival runways, drtormino the average number of exits(N) which

are: (a) within l pproprlatr exit range, and (b) separated by at

least 7so i8et

3. If N 18 4 or more, &xlt ?actor - 1.00

4. If N $8 1088 than 4, determine Exit Factor from table below for

appropriate nix index and portent arrivals

ExltXnge EXIT FACTOR E

Mix In&x--

Porcont (C*3D)

(Poet tram ' SOR Arrivals 601 Arrivals

thromhold) '

4OI Arrival8

N-O N-1 N-2 N-O N-1 N-2 N-O N-1 N-2

,or 3 or 3. or 3

0 to 20 2000 t o 4000 0.81 0.88 0.95 0.78 0.86 0.94 0.74 0.85 0.93

21 to so 3000 to ssoo 0.91 0.92 0.97 0.87 0.92 0.99 O.-J5 (1.87 0.98

Sl to 8 0 3SO0 to 6500 0.94 0.96 1.00 0.77 0.89 0.97 0.72 0.82 0.91

81 to 120 5000 to 7000 0.96 0.97 1.00 0.81 0.88 0.93 fs.80 0.87 0.92

, 121 to 180 -5500 t o 7S00 ~0.99,1.00,1.00 0.84 0194 0.97-0.85 0.94 0.97

.

i%URE 3-28. YOURLY CAPACIlY OF HUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: 44,51) F3R VFit CONDITIONS,

Chap 3

3 s
AC 150/5060-5 g/23/83

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE G*

NIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+JD)

VALS

1 to 10 oto 70

1 1 to 20 oto 7 0

21 to 30 ow 40

3 1 to 40 oto 1 0

4 1 to 50 oto 10

TOUCH & GO FACTOR T

ri

1 I

- em- --. .- . _-.

x E = Hourly Capacity

EXIT FACTOR E

To bterrine txit ?8ctor t:

1. Determine exit rurge for appropriate six index from t8ble klou

2. ?or 8rriV81 runw8y8, detenrine the 8vor8ge nmba of exit@(N) which

8x-e: (8) within 8ppropri8te exit rurge, and’(b) 8ep8r8ted by 8t

le88t 7so foot

3. If n im 4 or more, Exit ?8ctor - 1.00

4. If I( i8 less than 4, detedne Exit ?8ctor frum trble below for

8ppropri8te mix lnd8x 8nd percent 8rriv818

txit R8nge EXIT

nix Index--

FACTOR t

Pomnt (C+3D) (Feet fra ' 4OI Arrivala $08 Arrival8. 608 Arrivala

threaold) ' N-0 n-1 n-2 n-0 w-1 N-2 n-o m-11 N-2

or 3 or 3 or 3

oto 2 0 2000 to 4000 0.81 0.88 0.94 0.78 0.86 0.93 0.74 0.84 0.92

21 to so 3000 to ssoo 0.94 0.97 0.99 0.91 0.97 0.99 0.80 0.94 0.98

Sl to 80 3SO0 to 6500 0.95 0.97 1.00 0.83 0.93 1.00 0.74 0.82 0.91

81 to 120 SO00 to 7000 0.90 0.99 1.00 0.89 0.97 1.00 0.80 0.97 0.92

121 to 180 5500 to 7soo ~1.00,1.00 1.00 0.9s_1.00 1.00 0.86 0.94 0.97

hURE3-29. H O URLY CAPACITY O F RUNWAY - USE DIAGRAH NOS.: 55,51 FOR VFR CONDITIONS .

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C' TOUCH 8 GO FACTOR T

I VALS

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D)

?ercent Nix Index--

Touch 6 Go Percent (C+3D) TOUCH 6 GO ?ACTOR T

0 0 to 180 1.00

1 to 10 oto 70 1.03

11 to 2 0 oto 7 0 1.10

2 1 to 30 oto 40 1.19

31 to 40 tot0 10 1.31

41 to so oto 10 1.40

c* x t x E = Hourly Capacity

EXIT FACTOR E

To dmtermine txft t8ctor t:

1. Detenrlne exit rubga for 8ppropri8te dx index froa tab18 bqlov

2 . TOr 8rriV81 runw8y8, deterriM the l Vhre neOf oxits which

8m: (8) within 8pproprirte exit rage, 8nu (b) 8ep8r8ted by 8t

le88t 7S0 feet

3 . If N im 4 or more, txlt hctor - 1.00

4 . If W ia hmm th8n 4. doterriMtrit t8ctorfrom t8blo below for

8ppropri8te mlr index 8nd porcent 8rriv8lm

exit knge KXIT tACTOR L

Nix In&r--

?ercent (C+3D1 (Feet from 408 Arrlv8h ' 508 Arrivah

thrrmhold) ’ 1 608 Arrivals l

21 to 50 3000 to 5500 0.86 0.88 0.92 0.83 0.06 0.91 0.74 0.84 0.90

5 1 to 00 3500 to 6SO0 0.90 0.91 0.96 0.79 0.88 0.97 0.72 0.84 0.91

01 to 120 5000 to ‘)OOO 0.94 0.95 0.911 0.80 0.86 0.92 0.80 0.87 0.92

? 1 Gu25 5-50, YOURtY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAn NOS.: ii:,52 FOR ;/% CONDITIONS,

36

Chap 3
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C' TOUCH & GO FACTOR T

Percent Mix Index--

Touch & Go Percent(W3D9 TOUCH L GO FACTOR T

0 0 to 180 1.00

1 to 10 oto 70 1.03

11 to 20 oto 70 1.10

21 to 30 oto 40 1.19

IVALS 31 to 40 oto 10 1.31

41 to 50 oto 10 1.40

4 --._ _ --- -- _ _ -_. _- . . -.----. - _ .

b

llII#) C’xT x E = Hourly Capacity

L 1

EXIT FACTOR E

To determine Exit FaCtOr E:

1. Determine exit range for appropriate mix index from table below

2. For arrival runways, determine the average number of exits(N) which

are: (al within appropriate exit range, and (b) 8eparated by at

least 750 feet

3. ff N is 4 or more, Exit F8CtOr - 1.00

4. If N is leaa than 4, determine Exit Factor from table below for

appropriate mix index and percent arrivals

EXIT FACTOR E

Mix Index-- Exit Range

Percent(C+3Dl (Feet from 408 Arrivals 50% Arrival8 60% Arrivals

threshold) . N-0 N-1 N-2 N-0 N-l N-2 N-O N-l N-2 _

or 3 or 3 or 3

oto 20 2000 to 4000 0.73 0.88 0.95 0.71 0.87 0.94 0.68 0.85 0.93

20, ' ' ' ' ' ' 21 to so 3000 to 5500 0.89 0.92 0.95 0.87 0.90 0.94 0.84 0.89 0.94

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 51 to 80 3500 to 6500 0.96 0.97 0.99 0.95 0.96 0.98 0.89 0.94 0.97

81 to 120 so00 to 7000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.97 1.00

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D) c 121 to 180 5500 to 7500 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00-1.00 1.00 0.84 0.94 0.98,

l .

FIGURE 3-31, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY - USE DIAGRAM NOS.: 47,53 FOR VFR CONDITIONS.

TOUCH & GO FACTOR T

-r = LOO

C* x T x E = Hourly Capacity

EXIT-FACTOR E

To determine Exit Factor E:

1. Determine exit range for appropriate mix index from table below

2. For arrival runways, determine the average ryunber Of exits(N) which

are: (a) within appropriate eiit range, and (b) mparated by at

least 750 feet

3. If N is 4 or more, Exit Factor - 1.00

4. If N Is less than 4, determine Exit Factor from table below for

appropriate mix index and percent arrivals

Mix Index--

Percent (C+3D)

EXIT FACTOR E

2000 to 4000

21 to so 3000 to ssoo 0.90 0.93 0.97 0.88 0.91 0.95 0.86 0.90 0.95

51 to 80 3500 to 6500 0.97 0.98 1.00 0.95 0.96 0.98 0.92 0.97 0.99

INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D)

81 to 120 5000 to 7000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

MIX 121 to 180 5500 to 7500 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00~1.00

c

-.

FIGURE 3-32, \OURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NO, 48 FOR vF!t CONDifIONS,

Chap 3
AC 150/5060-S g/23/83

m I

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE c’ TOUCH & GO FACTOR T

Pmrc8nt nix Index--

Touch 6 Go Pmrcont(W3D) TOUCH C GO ?ACTOR T

0 0 to 180 1.00

1 to 10 oto70 / 1.04

11 to 20 oto 70 1.10

21 to 30 oto 40 1.20

-PERCENT ARR I VALS 31 to 40 oto 10 1.28

41 to so oto 10 1.36

c - --.-- -- _--- - __.e_ --.e- - -..____p_.-__ _ _

l

rlll#

C’xT x E = Hourly Capacity

.

EXIT FACTOR E

To deta3nino Exit ?actor Er

1. Detonnina exit range for l ppropriato nix index from tablo below

2. POr arrival runwaya, determine the average nU&Or of exits(N) which

are: (a) within appropriate oxit range, and (b) separated by at

lea8t 750 feet

3. If N im 4 or mon, Exit ?actor - 1.00

4. If N im lomo than 4, dotemine Exit Factor fram table below for

rppropriato mix index and potcent l rrivblr

EXIT ?ACTOR E

Nix Index-- Exit Range ,

Percent(C+3D)

(Foe from 40% Arriv8ls 50% Arrivalr 60% Arrival8

threshold) ' N-O N-l N-2 N-O N-1 N-2 N-O N-1 N-2

or 3 or 3 or 3

oto 20 2000 to 4000 0.86 0.87 0.94 0.82 0.85 0.93 0.7'1 0.84 0.92

21 to 50 3000 to 5500 0.88 0.91 0.96 0.73 0.86 0.94 0.73 C.86 0.94

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 51 to 80 3500 to 6500 0.84 0.87 0.93 0.78 0.87 0.93 0.78 0.87 0.93

81 to 120 5000 to 7000 0.83 0.90 0.96 0.83 0.90 0.96 0.83 0.90 0.96

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D) t 121 to 180 5500 to 7500,1.00,1.00 1.0 0.92 0.97 1.00 0.92 0.97 1.00

FIGURE 3-33, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY - USE DIAGRAM NOS .: S&61 FOR VFR CONDITIONS .

N

*

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE c* TOUCH 8 GO FACTOR T

11

T-MO

I I I I &PERCENT - ARRIVALS

340, 1

/

c-300,

-5 C” x T x E = Hourly Capacity I

"=260

lDDDl)j

a lIIn--t-I-I .

EXIT FACTOR E

To dotormineExit ?actor E:

1. Detennina oxit -ange for appropriate mix index froa table below

2. For 8rrival runwayr, dotormine the average number of l xft8(N) which

are: (a) within appropriate axit ranga, and (b) uparated by at

least 750 fmet

3. If N im 4 or aore, Exit Iactor - 1.00

4. If N is loam than 4, datermina Exit ?actor from table below for

8ppropriate rix index and porcont arrivals

. 1

nix b&8x-- txit lunge r EXIT FACTOR t .

Portent (C+3D) (Poet fron JO\ Arrivals

t i i i I

threshold) '

SOI Arrivala 1 60% Arrivals

N-O N-1 M-2 N-O N-1 N-2 N-0 N-t N-2

or 3 or 3 or 3

I

I L 1 1 1 I

oto 20 2000 to 4000 0.79 0.89 0.95 0.76 0.88 0.95 0.74 0.86 0.94

20 21 to 50 3000 to 5500 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.78 0.92 0.97

0 20 40 60 80 1010 120 140 160 180 51 to 80 3500 to 6500 0.93 0.96 1.00 0.80 0.90 0.97 0.78 0.87 0.93

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D)

81 to 120 5000 to 7000 0.93 0.96 1.00 0.83 0.90 0.96 0.83 0.90 0.96

121 to 180 5500 to 7500 0.97 0.99 1.00 0.93 0.97 1.00 0.92 0.97 1.00,

L I,

FIGURE 3-54. 4OURL’f CAPACITt IIF -RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NO, 56 FOR v% CONDITIONS,

Chap 3
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

I

m

w \

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE c _-_- __-__- .-__-_-. TOUCH ____ &______._ GO FACTOR ._. __..__ _ ---_----.-- _ - ._._T_ __- -_-. ,

Percont Xix Index--

Touch L Go Percent(W3D) TOUCH C GO PACTOR T

0 0 to 180 1.00

1 to 10 oto 70 1.03

11 to 20 oto 70 1.10

21 to 30 ok0 40 1.17

f VALS 31 to 40 OtQ 10 1.28

41 to 50 oto 10 1.36

_-- . -- - . -- ---

, 4

C” x T x E = Hourly Capacity

.

EXIT FACTOR E

To determine Exit Factor E:

1. Determine exit range for appropriate mix index from table below

2. rot arrival runway8, determine the average number of exits(N) which

are: (a)- within appropriate exit range, and (b) reparated by at

leeat 750 feet

3. If N is 4 or more, Exit pactor - 1.00

4. If N 18 less than 4, determine Exit Factor from table below for

appropriate mix index and percent arrivals

0 4

Xix Indax-- txit Range EXIT FACTOR E

Porcent(C+3D) (Poet fram 40% Arrivals 501 Arrivals 6OU Arrivals

threshold) N-0 N-1 N-2 N-O - N-l N-2 N-O N-l N-2

or 3 . or 3 or 3

oto 20 2000 to 4000 0.83 0.89 0.95 0.81 0.88 0.95 0.79 0.86 0.94

21 to 50 iOO0 to 5500 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 51 to 80 3500 to 6500 0.95 0.98 1.00 0.87 0.97 1.00 0.78 0.87 0.93

81 to 120 5000 to 7000 0.95 0.98 1.00 0.90 0.97 1.00 0.83 0.90 0.96

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3Dl 121 to 180 5500 to 7500 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.97 1.00

1 d ,

FIGURE 3-35, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: 57;63 FOR' VFR CONDITIONS,

. . * .

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C’ TOUCH & GO FACTOR T

. ,

Percent Xix Index--

Touch L Go Percent(C+3D) TOUCH L GO FACTOR T

0 0 to 180 1.00

1 to 10 oto 70 1.03

11 to 20 @to 70 1.10

21 to 30 ok0 40 1.17

I VALS 31 to 40 ottq 10 1.28

41 to 50 oto 10 1.36

l . #

4

Ce x T x E = Hourly Capacity \

. I

EXIT FACTOR E

To determine Exit Factor E:

1 : Determine exit rango for appropriate mix lndex from table below

For arrival runways, determine the average number of exit8fNl which

are: (a) within appropriate exit range, and (bl separated by at

If N is lora than 4, determine Exit Factor from table below for

, ii;;;;;;;;

appropriate mixindex and ,_,percent arrival8

ii; :r$;{;;f A;a;vah2;

2000 to 4000 0.78 0.89 0.95 0.75 0.88 0.95 0.72 0.86 0.94

21 to 50 3000 to 5500 0.96 0.96 0.98 0.95 0.95 0.98 0.83 0.94 0.98

0 2 0 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 51 to 80 3500 to 6500 0.90 0.93 0.97 0.81 0.90 0.96 0.78 0.87 0.94

INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D)

81 to '120 so00 to 7000 0.92 0.95 0.98 0.83 0.90 0.96 0.83 0.90 0.96

MIX 121 to 180 5500 to 7500 0.98.1.00 1.00 0.92 0.97 1.00 0.92 0.97 1.00,

. \ l .

'IGURE 3-%, YOURLY CAPACITY OF HUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS,: 58,64 FOR VFH CONDITIONS.

3

39
AC 150/5060-5 g/23/83

c

m

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C’ TOUCH & GO FACTOR T

Parcant Nix In&x--

Touch & Go PercenttC+3D) TOUCH 6 GO ?ACTOR T

L

0 0 to 180 1.00

1 to-10 oto 70 1.04

11 to 20 oto 70 1.10

21 to 30 oto 40 1.20

IVA,LS 31 to 40 oto 10 1.28

41 to so oto 10 1.36

. A

LlII~

C* x T x E = Hourly Capacity

/

EXIT FACTOR E

To determine Exit Factor E:

1. Determine exit range for appropriate mix index from table below

2. For arrival runway8, determine the average number of exit8(N) which

are: (a) within appropriate exit range, and (b) separated by at

lea8t 750 &et

3. If N i8 4 or more, Exit Factor = 1.00

4. If N i8 1088 than 4, determine Exit Factor from table below for

appropriate mix index and percent arrival8

t

EXIT FACTOR E

Mix Index-- Exit Range

Percent(C+3D)

(Feet from 401 Arrival8 SO8 Arrival8 6Oa Arrivals

threshold) '

I

oto 20 2000 to 4000 0.78 0.89 0.95 0.7s 0.88 0.95 0.72 0.86 0.94

21 to so 3000 to 5500 0.89 0.92 0.97 0.87 0.91 0.96 0.86 0.90 0.95

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 51 to 80 3500 to 6500 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.30 0.92 0.99 1.00

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D)

81 to 120 5000 to 7000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.97 1.00

121 to 180 5500 to 7500 -0.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.97 1.00

CI l l

r m 9

HOURL'Y CAPACITY BASE C' TOUCH & GO FACTOR T

220 T = LOO

200

'180

IVALS

I s h111)( C* x T x E = Hourly Capacity

EXIT FACTOR E

To datesmine Exit Factor E:

1. DeterPine cxit,range for appropriate mix index from table below

2 . For arrival runways, determine the average numbejc of exit5tN) which

are: (a) within appropriate exit range, and (b) 8eparatcd by at

lea8t 750 feet

3. .If N i5 4 or more, Exit Factor * 1.00

4 . If N i8 la85 than 4, determine Exit Factor fran table below for

appropriate mix index and percent arrivals

c I

EXIT FACTOR E

Ulx Xndex-- Exit Range

40, Percent(C+3D)

(Feet from 408 Arrival5 5OI Arrival8 60@ Arrival5

threshold) ' N-O N-1 N-2 N-O N-l N-? N-O N-l N-2

or 3 or3 or 3

oto 20 2000 to 4000 0.78 0.89 0.95 0.75 0.88 0.95 0.72 0.86 0.94

20. 21 to 50 3000 to 5500 0.87 0.92 0.97 0.85 0.91 0.96 0.83 0.90 0.95

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 51 to 80 3500 to 6500 0.98 0.99 l.CO 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.97 0.98 1.00

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D>

81 to 120 5000 to 7000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

121 to 180 . 5500 to 7500 1.00 1.00 i-00LU-LLLJ 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.37 1.00

L II, c

FIGURE 3-37, H OURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY - USE D I AGRAM NOS,: 59,65 FOR VFR CONDITIONS ,

FIGURE 3-38. .HOURLY CAPACITY OF HUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NO. 60 FOR ‘\(% CONDITIONSD

Chap 3
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

. 4

TOUCH & GO FACTOR T

,

Percent Mix Index--

Touch 6 Go Percent (C+3D) TOUCX i GO ?ACTOR T

I

0 0 to 180 1.00

1 to 10 oto 70 1.04

11 to 20 oto 70 1.10

21 to 30 oto 40 1.20

31 to 40 oto 10 1.31

41 to so oto 10 1.40

. .

l

lllH

C’xT x E = Hourly Capacity

? 4

EXIT FACTOR E

To determine Exit Pactor Er

1. Determine oxit rango for l pproprhte mix in&x from table below

2. ?or arrival runways, determine the average number of l xit8(N) which

are: (a) within appropriate exit rang8, &nd (b) separated by at

least 750 feet

3. If N is 4 or morm, Cxit ?actor - 1.00

4. If N 18 lese than 4, determine Cxit Factor from table below for

appropriate six index and percent arrival8

.

Exit Range XXIT FACTOR C

Nix fnd8x--

Petrcent(C+30) (Feet from ' 40% Arriv8ls 5Oa Arrivals 60@ Arrival8

threshold) N-O N-l N-2 N-O N-l N-2 N-O N-l N-2

or 3 or 3 or 3

oto 2 0 2000 to 4000 0.70 0.86 0.93 0.67 0.85 0.92 0.64 0.83 0.91

21 to 50 3000 to 5500 0.96 1.00 i.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.78 0.92 0.97

51 to 80 3500 to 6500 0.93 0.96 1.00 0.80 0.90 0.97 0.78 0.87 0.93

81 to 120 5000 to 7000 0.93 0.96 1.00 0.83 0.90 0.96 0.83 0.90 0.96

121 to 180 5500 to 7500 0.97 0.99 1.00,0.93 0.97 1.00 0.92,0.97 1.00,

.

FIGURE j-39, flOuRLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NO. 52 FOR VFR CONDITIONS.

. c

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C’ TOUCH & GO FACTOR T

Percent Nix Index--

420 Touch & Go tb Percent(C+30) TOUCH L GO ?ACTOR T

0 0 to 180 1.00

1 to 10 oto 70 1.03

380 11 to 20 oto 70 1.10

21 to 30 oto40 1.18 ,

I VALS

340.

g300

4

llu#f C’ x T x E = Hourly Capacity

OpE l I

cm220 EXIT FACTOR E

-200

zTo dotorarino txit ?actor tr

~$180 1. Dmtwmino exit rang0 for appropriate mix index from table below

2. ?Or arriVA1 runway8, dotorrino the merAg numbor of exit.(N) which

are: (a) within appropriate exit range, and (b) roparated by at 1aaa 750 foot

3. If N ir 4 or more, Exit mctor - 1.00

4. Xf N ir le.0 than 4, detormino Exit ?actor from table below for

100

appropriate mix index and percent arrival8

w

EXIT FACTOR E

Nix Index-- Exit Range

60 Percent(C+30) (Feet from ' 40% Arrival8 SOB Arrivals 60% Arrival8

threshold) N-O N-l N-2 N-O N-1 N-2 N-O N-1 N-2

or 3 or 3 or 3

oto 2 0 2000 to 4000 0.75 0.87 0.94 0.64 0.82 0.93 0.62 0.79 0.90

21 to so 3000 to 5500 0.81 0.89 0.96 0.72 0.83 0.93 0.72 0.83 0.93

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 51 to 80 3500 to 6500 0.81 0.90 0.95 0.75 0.84 0.92 0.75 0.84 0.92

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D)

81 to 120 5000 to 7000 0.88 0.92 0.97 0.81 0.87 0.94 0.81 0.87 0.94

121 180 to 5500 to 7500 0.93 0.97 0.98 0.89 0.96 0.98 0.89 0.96 0.98

t \ .

F I G U RE 3-40, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: 80,81,95,96 FOR VFR CONDITIONS,

Chap 3
AC 150/5060-5 g/23/83

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C+

f VALS

201 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A- I

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D)

TOUCH 8 GO FACTOR T

Pacent Mix Index-- ?ACTOR T

Touch 6 Go Percent (C+3D) TOUCH L GO

, .

0 0 to 180 1.00

1 to 10

1 1 to 2 0

21 to 3 0

31 to 40

4 1 to 5 0

I oto 7 0 1.03

oto 70 1.05

oto 4 0 1.09

oto 10 1.15

oto 10 1.20 I

I#‘c’ x T x E = Hourly Capacity

l

EXIT FACTOR E

To determine Exit ?actor Er

1. Determine exit tango for appropriate nix inbox from tablo below

2. For arrival runways, determine the aarago nuubu of oxits which

are: (a) within appropriate exit range , and (b) soparatod by at

least 750 feet

3 . If N is 4 or mn, Exit ?actor - 1.00

4. If N is less than 4, determine Exit ?actor fm table below for

appropriate mix index and percant arrivals

Exit Range EXIT ?ACTOR t

Mix Index--

Percent (C+3D)

(?ee from L 40% Arriv818 506 Arrivals 6OB Arrivals

threshold) ' N-0 N-1 N-2 N-0 N-1 N-2 N-O N-1 N-2

or 3 or 3 or 3

oto 2 0 2000 to 4000 0.62 0.79 0.90 0.62 0.79 0.90 0.62 0.79 0.90

21 to 5 0 3000 to 5500 0.72 0.83 0.93 0.72 0.83 0.93 0.72 0.83 0.93

51 to 80 3500 to 6500 0.75 0.84 0.92 0.75 0.84 0.92 0.75 0.84 0.92

81 to 120 5000 to 7000 0.81 0.87 0.94 0.81 0.87 0.94 0.81 0.87 0.94

121 to 180 5500 to 7500 1.00 l.OO,l.OO 0.89 0.96 0.98 0.89 0.96 0.98

FIGURE 3-41, HOURLY CAPACITY of RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: 83,84,98,99,102 FOR VFR CONDITIONS.

~~~

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C’

XVALS

6C,

20.

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

MIX INDEX -A PERCENT ‘K+3D)

I TOUCH 8 GO FACTOR T

I

Percent Mix Index--

Touch L Go Percent (C+3D) TOUCX C GO ?ACTOR T

0 0 to 180 1.00

1 to 10 oto 7 0 1.03

1 1 to 2 0 oto 7 0 1.05

21 to 3 0 oto 40 1.09

31 to 40 oto 10 1.15

41 to so oto 10 1.20

,

C* x f x E = Hourly Capacity

To

1.

2.

3.

4.

EXIT FACTOR E

detoraine Exit ?8ctor Er

Datumin exit range for 8ppropri8t8 mix in&x from tab10 klou

?or urlval nmw8ys, dotunlna the 8vmr8ge n-r of exits(N) which

8ra: (8) within 8pQlFOpri8t8 exit rUIQ0, Uid (b) mrat.d by 8t

lerst tso f8at

If N is 4 or aore, Exit Factor - 1.00

If n is 1888 than 4, detexairn Exit Fsctor

8ppropriate mix index 8nd pemnt 8rriv818

from tab10 klou for

I

Wx Index--

PorcentW3Dl

oto 20

21 to so

t

51 to 80

81 to 120

121 to 180

Exe Range EXIT ?ACTOR t

(Feet from '

threshold) '

401 krimAS 1 508 arrivals 1 6Da Arrirrrls

n-o~~l~B-2~w-o~ar~~2~lolo~~lla2

lor 3 I lor 3 or 3

2000 to 4000 0.62 0.7910.90 0.6210.7910.90 0.62 0.79 0.90

3000 to 5500 0.72 0.83 0.93 9.72 0.83 0.93 0.72 0.83 0.93

3500 to 6500 0.75 0.84 0.92 0.75 0.84 0.92 0.75 0.84 0.92

5000 to 7000 0.81 0.87 0.94 0.81 0.87 0.94 0.81 0.87 0.94

5500 to 7500 0.89 0.96 0.98 0.89 0.96 0.98 0.89 0.96 0.98

FIGURE 3-42, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: 85,86,100,101 FOR VFR CONDITIONS.

42
E/l;93 . AC 150/5060-j CHG 1

. 4

HOU!lLY CAPXITY BASE C’

a0

TO chtetmrne Cxrt Fxtor b:

tJet~mlnr exxt tang* for approptfata 31x lndrx from cab18 beLou

tot arrival ~runuays, dmtecnlnr the averaqe Xinbet OC exits(N) vhfc.?

(a) wlthln l pproprlrte exit range, and !b) rqurrted by at

Irat 750 fart

If ?( is 4 or more, Exit Factor - 1.90

ff !i is 11~8 than b. detem1.v Zxit Facror from :anls 3obw for

appropriate .3&x index and percent arr:valr

.

'0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

MIX INDEX -- PEKENT K+3D)

.

FIGURE 3-43. HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DlAGiiAM NOS. I, 54 FQR IFii CONDITIONS.

t t

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE c'

v

T = 1.00

IVALS

To detamtnr Sxlt Factor r_:

9rtemlnr art ranqm for 4pptoprf~ce *ix :ndax Croln t-10 -Lou

for rrrlvalrunways, ~mcmmi.lr the avwtaqo 5umnrr 3f l xlts(r-4) WhlCFi

l pproprrate exit fanqe. and !b) repataced 3y at

fZ .N 18 4 or morr. Fsetor - L.90

:f Y 18 Lasa than 4. docennfne O,xit factor from t&la SoLor ior

l ppropr;ate nix Index and ~resnt arrivals

c

FIGURE 334. HCUErf CAPACIN OF 2UNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS. 2,3.9,61 - 68, i2 - id, 76, 77,79,80,

82 -8587 -89.91.92. S?4.95,97 - 100. 102 FOR IF3 CONDITIONS.

Chap 3 43
AC 150/5060-j CHG 2

El/95

HOURLY CA?ACITY BASE c'

O.,.

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D>

T 0 U L” ii 8 r, n c p ,- 7 ,- -

-

I

i

T = 1.00

I

.

.

fo 3otormlnr Exit Pactor C:

L. - Oet8mtno ~xtt r8nae for appropriate nix lndrx frum table sllow

2. ?or arrivrl runways. htermine the averaqe w.Wtber 3f exitr(N1 vhlcn

am: (a) vttnin l pproprfaee exit ranqe, and 0~) separated 3y at

Learnt 750 feet

3. If N ;a 4 or mr8. Lxtt factor - 1.00

from tabLe below for

FIGURE 3-45. HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS. 4,5,75,50 FOR IFFI CONDITIONS.

FiGURE 346. DEtflED

Chap 3
E/1/95 AC 150/5060-j CHG 3

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C’ TOUCH & GO FACTOR T

110

T= 1.a

100

WALS

90

1

& 80

s p&j c* x T x E

k2 = 70

= Hourly Capacity

1 EXIT FACTOR E

to drtarmfnr Fxtt Factor Z:

1 . Dm+amlnr axat range for l pproprlrto mix iadmx ftort8010kla

2.- Forarrival rurwaym. brtrtino t4r l rrrmqr n-r of l ritxCn) ~&a

am: Cal dtntn qptoprlrt* l r:t raaqo, mb (b) wmrwd by 4~

1oa.t 750 feat

3. If N f8 4 or urm, fxit ?utor - 1.00

4. Xf W 18 1~0 than 4. btrrmtna Exit ?actor Fra trbh kAa lor approprirto tix Ladmx rrrd parrant arrival8

r

*lx IndarP*rcoacCC*301

FiGURE3-47. HOURLYCAPACITYOFRUNWAY-USEDIAGMM NO. 7 FOR IF2 CONDITIONS.

l

TOUCH 8 GO FACTOR T

1 = LOO

A l

rrl#

Cí x T x E = Hourly Capacity

EXIT FACTOR E

70 datmiaine Zxlt Putor Z:

1. Dltrmtm l xLt ranpa for appropriate six Fntbx from table 301~

2. For arrival zanr~ys. drtmmine t!m rvwraqr number af oxitS which

arm:(al within appropriate exit ranqr, and (5) l oparated by at

LRa8t ‘SO %rt

3. Xi !4 i8 4 or sor8, rxit Pwtor - L-00

4. ff ?( 18 :.88 than 4. dotrnainm zxlt Putor from table 3rlw for

l pproprfaea air lndox and percent srrfv8ls

f

l4lx Index- Zxtt Unqo sx:: ?ACYOR t I

PorcrntCC* 30) (toe irm ’ 408 Arrival* I 508 Arr2val8 $08 Arrivals I

thrmrhoLd¶ ' N-0 s-1 ?c-2 N-0 N-1 m-2 s-0 N-1 n-2

I

or 3 -orI . or?

J to 20 2000 :o 4000 0.39 1.50 1.70 0.39 I.JO

LZL to 180 5500 to ‘500 ! 0.30 L-10 1.30 I! 0.35 L-00

1.00 0.38 o-39 1.30

21 to so 1000 to 5500 0.95 0.38 0.99 0.93 0.38 0.99 0.31 0.37 0.39

51 to 30 3500 to 5500 0.35 0.38 1.30 0.34 0.39 L-30 0.32 0.38 1.30

91 t0 220 5000 to 7000 0.36 0.99 1.30 0.34 0.39 1.30 0.33 o-99 1.30

l.JO.O.34 0.39.L.30

.

FiGURE 348. HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NO. 8 F9R IF2 CONCITIONS.

Chap 3
AC 150/5060-5 CHG 3 13!1/95

.

4 9 w

HOUXLY CA?ACITY ELSE C' TOUCH g GO FACTO!? T

100

T = 1.00

90

I’fALS

80

.

c,

4

70

-z

s

ggz 60

)IIMH C’ x T x E = Hourfy Capacity

g 50 1

NIT FACTOR E

-0

3;

To drtenlnm Zxit ?8ctor t:

5s 40 1. ~tmminr l xzt c8nqm tot 8QQtopti8tm r&X itlckX ?B t8bh kiO~

2. -?or l rrlv81 ruavmys, Uotonairrr tn0 8vmr8qe smbmr 0C l xit8tn~ WR~CR

2: 30

an: (a) wtthfn l pproprlato oxit ranqo. and (b) separwmd by at

ham+ 7so cemt

is 3. If J Is 4 or mrm. Exit t8ctor - 1.30

=. 20

4. Tf ?I 1s 18~8 -nan 4, drtoraino 5ft ?8ctor from t8nlm Srlou for

8QQroprht8 -LX iad8X 8nd pWC8nt l miVX18

i

Exrt R8nqm tx:: ?ux zldmx--

10 Porcont (C*30) Wemt froa

tnrmsnoAd1

0 to 2 0 zoo0 co 4000

I

0 21 to so 1000 to 5500 f - Loo

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 310 160 180 51 to 80 3500 L,o 6500

81 t0 i20 so00 to 7000

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3Il> 121 to :bO _ ssoo to 7500 A

. 4

FIGURE j-49. HOURLY CAPACIP OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NO. 29 FOR IFR CONDITIONS.

. 4 4 1

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C' TOUCH 8 GO FACTOR T

f-ml

\

EXIT FACTOR E

MIX iNDEX -- PE3CE!fT K*3Dl

!%Uf?E3-% HOURLY CAf'ACtmOF%JNWAY-USE ot&#AMNOS.It,7~F~R IFRCONDIT~ONS.

A

3 6 Chap 3
WI/95 AC 150/5060-5 CHG 3

HOURLY CAPACITY 3ASE C'

9 I

TOUCCt s GO FACTOR T

T = IJO

IV‘AU

b 4

1131~ C’xT XE = Hourly Capacity

t

l

EXIT FACTO2 E

To dmtmrmlne Zxft F8ctor 5:

1. Dmtmminml xlt rmqo for rppropri8to *ix tndex froa t8bh *LOW

2. ?or arrival runuays. dmtmrmtnm cnm wmraqr nuanmr at exits(N) uhicn

8rm : (8) Wtthin l QPrOQri8tm aXit r8ngm. and (b) SmQatatd by at

le88t 750 femt

1. If J 18 4 or norm, Zxit ?8ctor - 1.30

4. Xi r( 18 ha8 th8n b. dmtonainm Exit P8Ctor !rOa t8ble htou for

l ppraQri8c8 axlndrr and percent arrtv8Lr

c

Exit Rulqe txrt

Mix Indmx-

?AC’=OR t

Porcmnt K+3Dl Wmot :ra ’ 408 Arrlvrla I 508 Arriv8lr : 38

1 Arrlvala I

thrmmnold)

z-43.2-50

N-0 n-1 x-2 N-0 N-1 N-2 N-0 s-1 s-2

I 3 to 20 :ooo ‘-3 4030 ‘0.5: 0.3: orO.?S3 1 0.33 ! 3.35 0.99 or Y 0.32 ~.3011.30 1 or Y 1

21 to JO 3000 ‘-0 5500 0.79 0.36 0.32 0.77 0.85 0.92 6.39 0.38 1.30

sl CO a0 3300 eo 6500 o.a1 0.37 0.33 0.77 0.33 0.31 0.30 0.38 1.90

MIX INREX -- PERCENT K+3D>

81 to 120 5000 t0 7000 o.a3 0.39 0.34 0.30 0.36 0.92 0.93 0.91 3.97

:21 ‘,o !80 ssoo to ?SOO -0.36 0.3410.98 0.33 0.~1~~.36,0.79 0.39 0.3si

J . 4

201

0 20 40 60 80 100 I.20 140 160 180

FIGURE 3-51. HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGXAM NOS. 12,71 FOR IFR CONDITIONS.

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C’ TOUCH 8 GO FACTOR T

I VALS

IIlB~ C’ x T x E = Hourly Capacity

.

EXIT FACTOR E

Tb ~otomlno Exit T8ctor t: -

1. mcormubm l m1c CM90 lor XQprOQZi8CO mix lndar ftor t8alr -141

a. Pot 8trlv81 runurys. btmerlnrcnm l vmrrqe nbmomr ot l 8ft8(M) vnlcb

8rm: (8) ritnln qproprlru 08&f rango. ubd (b8 uwr8cd by 8c

lrrmt 7so her

3. If N 18 b or more. Exit t8ccot * 1.30

b. If N 18 Lmm8 tnan 4. bmrirm&nm fait Factor fro tulrn blou Lo+

agpaQrt8tmmix :ndmx and porcmnt l rrivrb .

txrt ?AC?38 f

?mrcut(C*)O) tnroaoAb1

I

0 to 20 2000 co 1580

a1 to b0 2000 to SO00 E-L 00

41 to 70 3300 to 000

71 fo 110 so00 to 7000

nrx InDa -- PERCEN K+3D> 121 to 180 I tsoo to 7so0 4

4

FlGIJRE3-52. HOURLYCAPACITY OFRUNWAY-USE DIAGFWI NOS. 13, l&24,27 FOR IFR CONDITiONS.

47

Chap 3
AC 150/5060-j CHG2 13/l/95

r 4 t .

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C' TOUCH 8 GO FACTO? Jb 1

IBBBH C’xTxE = Hourly Capacity

? *

EXIT FACTOR E

Vo dmtmrrtnm hit ?8etot fr

2. -t,rri- *at r8mpa roe 89propri8tr rni% lndmx fra t8bh bola

2. - Pot 8mlTl nya. dotorrlno the 8vmr8qa n-r of l xit8(n) rhicn

l o* (8) within 8wfwti8t~ l rlt rwa. and (b) ropmr8tod by at

learnt 7so roat

3. tf II f8 4 or mro. hit ?8ctor - 1.00

4. ff m 18 ham tfiat 4. dOt8~ln. hit rrctor fra t8bfO 3rla for

8QQtaprt8t.l tX lndor l nd p.mnt atriVe;

f hit mnqo t x :t

nix Indoi-

?ACf3R t

hrtont K* fb) Weme Cra (t-J* AtriVal

thfmaRold~

j 508 Arrtv818 j 538 Arrlv8lr

N-q-j N-1 - q-2

1 I I

N-O n-1 ?I-2 N-0 J-1 s-2

, or I or 1 or 3

3 to 20 2000 co )SOO 1 !lQ I I.347 .no I 00 1.3a 1.00 30 ’ I.30 I.30

21 to 40 moo to 5000 J ofi i.00 1 .ofi 1 00 1 .oo I .30 1.00 1 00 1 .oo

41 to 70 3300 to 6SOO 1 9n 1.00 1 00 I .on 1 .oo II.00.30 00 I I.00

RIX INDEX -0 PERCE?IT K+3D) 12271 to 280 to 120 Go0 so00 to to 7000 ?fOO 1.00 0 971 .on onI 1 I I

Q 98jl 90

I on 00 t .oo ! 00 I 00 r.00

90 190 no 190* I30 1.00

t a

FIGURE 3-53. idOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NO. 27 FOR IFR CONDITIONS.

I 9

TOUCH 8 GO FACTOR T

T = I.00

.

BBB# 4

C’xTxE = Hourly Capacity

EXIT FACTOR E

To cbtmmin~ ?hit ?8ceor t:

2. ktmminm l %1t r8nqa tot appropriate mix lndox ita t8bh 30b~

2. tot 8rrlvrl runvrv8. d*t8mlnm thr l vmr8qe numemr of l xit8(N1 mlch

8ra’ (81 witnln 8pproprlatm 8rlc r8ngr. 8nd lb) roQrr8C.d 3y 8t

1Or8t 730 f8.t

1. ff 3 18 4 or norm. Exit t8ctor - 2.00

4. xi ?( 18 I.88 cttrn 4. dmterrinm Zxlt f8ctor from taah sllleu ior

l gpropfirtm n&r tndmr and mrcrnt l rrlv818

Nix tndoxPmrconc (C* ID1

:mo :o 4000

21 to so 1000 to ssoo 1.30 L.30'1.00 0.90 0.96 0.98 0-W 0.96 0.99

Sl co 80 YSOO co 6500 1.30 1.30 I.00 0.31 0.97 :.oo 0.9L 0.9' l-00

81 to L20 so00 to '000 1.30 l.JO :.Jo l.JO :. 30 1.30 0.91 0.98 1.10

l21 c,o 160 5500 20 '500 ,:.a0 1. 90 1.20 l.JO,1.30 1.30.0.10.0.9' l-30

.

FiGURE 3-54. HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS. 1528 FOR IFR CONDITIONS:

1s Chap 3
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C' TOUCH & Go FACTOR T

40

20* I I 1

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D)

c*xT x E

EXIT FACTOR E

To determine Exit Factor E:

1. Determine exit range for appropriate mix index from table below

2. For arrival runways, determine the average number of exita which

are: (a) within appropriate exit range, and (b) separated by at

least 750 feet

3. If N la 4 or more, Exit Factor - 1.00

4. If N is less than 4, determine Exit Factor from table below for

appropriate mix index and percent arrivals

Mix Index--

Percent(C+3D)

Exit Range

(?eet from

threnhold)

I

2000 to 4000

3000 to 5500

3500 to 6500

5000 to 7000

5500 to 7500

EXIT ?ACTOR- t

40% Arrival8 50% Arrivala 601 Atrfv818 1

N-O N-1 N-2. N-O N-1 N-2 N-0 N-l N-2

I

or 3 or 3 or 3

0.98 0.99 1.00 0.98 0.99 1.00 0.98 0.99 1.00

0.90 0.96 0.98 0.90 0.96 0.98 0.90 0.96 0.98

0.92 0.98 1.00 0.92 0.98 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00

0.95 0.99 1.00 0.92 0.99 1.00 0.91 0.98 1.00

0.95 0.99 1.00 0.90 0.97 1.00~0.90 0.97 1.00

hGURE 3-55, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: 18,22,26,31,3L FOR IFR CONDITIONS.

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C'

I J PERCENT - PERCENT ARR ARRII

180 I , ,

120, I

I I I I I I

201

0 20 40 600 80 100 120 140 160 180 80 100 120 140 160 180

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D)

VALS

I

TOUCH & GO FACTOR T

I

T = LOO

c I

C’xT x E = Hourly Capacity

EXIT FACTO'R E

To datermine Exit Factor E:

1. Determine exit range for l pproprlate mix index from table below

2. ?or arrival mways, &termine the averago number of l xftm(N) which

are: (a) within appropriate exit ranger and (b) separated by at

least 750 feet

3. Xf N is 4 or more, Exit Factor - 1.00

4. If N is leae than 4, determine Exit Factor from table below for

appropriate u&x index and percent arrivals _

lllx Indox-- Exit Range EXIT ?ACTOR t

P8rcmt(C+3D) (Feet from ' 4OI Arriv818 SO@ Arrival8 60@ Arrival8

A

threshold) N-O N-1 N-2 N-O N-1 N-2 N-O N-1 It-2

or 3 or 3 or 3

oto 20 2000 to 4000 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00

21to so 3000 to 5500 0.90 0.96 0.98 0.90 0.96 0.98 0.90 0.96 0.98

51 to 80 3500 to 6500 0.91 0.97 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00

81 to 120 5000 to 7000 0.91 0.98 1.00 0.91 0.98 1.00 0.91 0.98 1.00

'121 to 180 5500 to 7500 0.92 0.97 1.00 0.90 0.97 1.00 0.90 0.97 1.00

.

FIGURE 3-55, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: I%25 FOR IFR CONDITIONS,

Chap 3
AC 150/5060-S g/23/83

.

TOUCH 8 60 FACTOR T

T=MlO

IM# C”xTxE = Hourly capactty

l

EXIT FACTOR E

To determine Exft I8ctor Et

1. atemine exit r8age for rpprapr$ate rix b&x ireor table belou

2 . For arrival rummy*, btomho tba merage at&or of exits(m) uhich

are: (8) tithln8ppropr%8kultruage,and tb) sapu8todlsyrt

b8St 750 f-t

3, If N ia 4 or more, Exit t8ctor - 1.00

4. If R is 1088 than 4, deterdae Exit ?8ctorfrm tablr behu for

lpp~ri8terixl~xurb~~turi~~

t

Exit RAnge EXIT ?ACTOR L

nix Index--

Percent tC+3DI (met fwr ’ 4oe Arriv8ls 5oe Arrh8l.s 6oe lvririlr

oto 20 2000 to 4000 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 l-00 0.98 1.00 1.00

21 to 50 3000 to 5500 0.90 0.96 0.98 0.90 0.96 0.98 0.90 0.96 0.98

51 to 80 3500 to 6500 0.91 0.97 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00

121 to 180

-

FIGURE 3-57, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: 78,81,&93,96,101 FOR IFR CONDITIONS,

. . 1

HOURLY CAPACITY BASEG’ TOUCH 8 60 fACTOR T

T = 1.00

IVALS

.

rlll#) C'xTxE = Hourly Capacity

I

EXIT FACTOR E

To bterdne Exit ?8ctor Er

1. Doternine exit range for 8ppropriate nix index from t8ble belou

2: ?or 8rrfv81rumf8ys,dmtezdne the l v8r8ge amber ofl xit8(X) which

8X.: (8) Within 8mlcopri8tr exit rw, urd tb) Uw8t.d w 8t

loa8t 750 fee

3. If I is 4 or more, ExLt ?actor - 1.00

4. If 1 is loss th8n 4, dmtarria; bit ?rctor fror tabla klw for

8pproprirk m&x indsx and pemnt 8ZXiV818

\ I

EXIT ?ACTOR t

,

nixIndex-- LJtm

Pucmt~C+3D)

(?.a frar ' 408 Arrivxls so* Arriv818 68rsaxr

thEmhold) ' x-o w-1 B-2 N-0 lsll M-2 'Iwo -1 rt

or 3 or3 or 3

oto 20 2000 to 4000 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.58 1.00 1.00

20 21 to 50 3000 to 5500 0.90 0.96 0.98 0.90 0.96 0.98 0.90 0.96 0.98 0 20 4 0 60 80 loo 120 140 160 180 51 to 80 3500 to 6500 0.91 0.9; 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00

81 to 120 5000 to 7000 0.91 O-98 1.00 0.91 0.98 1.00 0.91 0.98 1.00

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D) . 121 to 180 5500 to 7500 0.92 0.97 1.00 0.90 0.97.1.00 0.90 0.97 1.00

I l t

F I GURE 3-58, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAh! NOS.: 32035,37042 FOR IFR CONDITIONS,

.

Chap 3
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

‘I l .

H OURLY CAPACITY BASE C' TOUCH & GO FACTOR T

1

T = 1,OO

VALS

9

?ACTOR E

Mix Index-- Exit Range EXIT I

Percent(W3D) (?eet from 401 Arrivala V 56% Arrlvalm 60% Arrivals

thremhold) N-O N-1 N-2 N-O N-1 N-2 N-O N-1 N-2

or 3 or 3 or 3

oto 20 2000 to 4000 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00

21 to so 3000 to 5500 0.92 0.99 1.00 0.91 d.99 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 51 to 80 3500 to 6500 0.91 0.98 1.00 0.90 0.97 1.00 0.92 0.99 1.00

MIX INDEX.-- PERCENT K+3D)

81 to 120 5000 to 7000 0.94 0.98 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00

121 to 180 5500 to 7500 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.99 1.00 0.91 0.99 1.00

l .

I -

!III~ C+ x T x E = Hourly Capacity

EXIT FACTOR E

To detersine Exit ?actorE:

1. Determane exit range for l pproprlate mix index from table below

2. ?or arrival runwaym, deterarlne the average number of exits(N) which

are: (a) within l pproprlate exit range, and (b) separated by at

le8st 750 feet

3. If N is 4 or more, Exit ?actor - 1.00

4. If N is lew than 4, deterrlne Exit ?actor from table below for

appropriate nix index and percent arrival8

FIGURE 3-59, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: 43,49,55 FOR IFR CONDITIONS,

.

. v . l

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C' TOUCH & GO FACTOR T

100 T = 1.00

90

IVALS

80

h ,

8

5s 70

s lll~ C’xT x E = Hourly Capacity

5: 60

E" 50

e EXIT FACTOR E

-z2-0- To determine Exit Factor E:

us 40 1 . Determine exit range for appropriate mix index from table below

-a 2 . For arrival runvaya, determine the average number of exits(N) which

NE

are: (a) within appropriate exit ranqt, and (bl separated by at

2sE 30 3. learnt If N la 750 more, 4 or feet Exit Factor - 1.00

4. If N lm lesm than 4, determine Exit Factor from table below for

20,

appropriate mix index and percent arrival8

1 9

Exit Range EXIT FACTOR E

nix Index-- 408 Arrival8 ' 508 Arrival8 6OB Arrivals 1

(Feet frm 10, Percent (C+3D) thremhold) .NIO

N-1 N-2 N-O

1 N-1 N-2 N-O - N-1 N-2 .

or 3 or 3 or 3

oto 20 2000 to 4000 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00

0, I ! - . 21 to so 3000 to 5500 0.92 0.99 1.00 0.9'1 0.99 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 51 to 80 3500 to 6500 0.91 0.98 1.00 0.90 0.97 1.00 0.92 0.99 1.00

81 to 120 5000 to 7000 0.94 0.98 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00 0.91 0.97 'r.00

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D) 121 to 180 ‘ 5500 to 7500 -0.95 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.99 1.00 0.9: 0.99 1.00

b A ,

FIGURE 3-50, HOURLY CAPACITY OF HUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: 44,50,55 FOR IFR CONDITIONS,

QlaP 3

51
AC 150/5060-S g/23/83

c II * c

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C' TOUCH & GO FACTOR T

100 T T = 1.00

90, I .

I I I I I I &PERCENT Am VALS

e n

8

lBBB#

L

C’xTxE = Hourly Capacity

To determine Exit Factor E:

1. -tennine exit range for appropriate mix index from table below

.2. nor arrival runways, determine the average number of exita which

are: (a) within appropriate exit range, and (b) separated by at

least 750 feet

3 . If N 18 4 or more, Exit Factor - 1.00

4. If N is leas than 4, dtttnnfnt Exit Factor from table below for

appropriate anix index and percent arrivals

1

Exit ltmqt EXIT FACTOR E

Mix Index--

Percent(C+3D) (Feet from 404 Arrival8 SO8 Arrival8 6Oa Arrival8

threshold) '

1

N-O N-l N=2 N-O N-1 N-2 N-O N-l'N=2

or 3 or 3 or 3

0 to 20 2000 to 4000 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00

21 to so 3000 to SSOO 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.99 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 51 to 80 3500 to 6500 0.93 1.00 1.06 0.90 3.97 1.00 0.90 0.98 1.00

PERCENT K+3Dl

81 to 120 SO00 to 7000 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00 MIX INDEX -- 121 t0 180 5500 to 7500 1.00 1.00 I.00 0.92 0.99 1.00 0.92 0.99 l.ooJ

b

FIGURE. 3-61, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY - USE DIAGRAM NOS .: 45,51,57 FOR IFR CONDITIONS .

. 4

EXIT FACTOR E

c

. .

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C’ TOUCH & GO FACTOR T

T = 1,OO

= Hourly Capacity

EXIT FACTOR E

To determine Exit Factor E:

1 . Determine exit range for appropriate mix Index from table below

2 . For arrival runwaya, dttcrmlne the avtraqt number of txtta(N) which

art: (a) within appropriate exit ranqc, and (h) separated by at

lea8t 750 feet

3 . Sf N 4 or more, Exit Factor - 1.00

0.94 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00

3000 to ssoo 0.9s 0.98 1.00 0.93 0.99 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 51 to 80 31500 to 6500 0.92 0.97 1.00 0.90 0.97 1.00 0.90 0.98 1.00

81 to 120 5000 to 7000 0.96 0.98 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D)

FIGURE 3-52, YOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: 46,933 FOR 1% CONDITIONS,

52 map ‘3
g/23/83 AC 150,'5060-5

HOURLY CAPACITY BASE C* TOUCH 8 GO FACTOR T

T = la00

80 I/ I I

I I I i

OC

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D> I

c* x T x E = Hourly Capacity

EXIT FACTOR E

To determine Exit Factor E:

1. Determine exit range for appropriate mix index from table below

2. For arrival runway8, determine the average number of exit8(N) which

are: (a) within appropriate exit range, and (b) separated by at

least 750 feet

3. If N is 4 or more, Exit Factor - 1.00

4. If N is less than 4, determine Exit Factor from table below for

appropriate mix index and percent arrivals

Exit Range EXIT FACTOR E

nix Index--

Percent (C+3D)

(Feet from 40% Arrival8 SO% Arrival8 60% Arrivals

threshold) ' N-O N-1 N-2 N-0 N-1 N-2 N-O N-1 N-2

or 3 or 3 or 3

oto 20 2000 to 4000 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00

2 1 to s o 3000 to 5500 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00

51 to 8 0 3500 to 6500 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.99 1.00

8 1 to 120 SO00 to 7000 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00

121 to 180 5500 to 7500 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.99 1.00 . .- -_. -

rl

FIGURE 3-63. HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY - USE DIAGRAM NOS .: 47,59 FOR !FR CONDITIONS ,

HOURLY-CAPACITY BASEC'

.oo

90, 1 . \

- PERCENT ARR I

30,

20,

10

0

0 20

20

40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT (C+3D>

VALS

111

TOUCH & GO FACTOR T

I

T=l,OC

I I

C'xT x E = Hourly Capacity

EXIT FACTOR E

To determine Exit Factor E:

1. Determine exit range for appropriate mix index from table below

2. For arrival runwaya, determine the average number of exits(N) which

are: (a) within appropriate exit range, and (b) separated by at

least 750 feet

3. If N is 4 or more, Exit Factor - 1.00

4. If N is la88 than 4, determine Exit Factor from table below for

' appropriate mix index and percent arrivala

I

Exit Range EXIT FACTOR E

Mix Index-- (Feet from 408 Arrival8 50% Arrival8 604 Arrival8

Percent (C+3D) threshold) N-0 N-1 N-2 N-O N-1 N-2 N-0 N-1 N-2

or 3 or 3 or 3

r oto 20 2000 to 4000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.30

21 to 50 3000 to 5500 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00

51 to 80 3500 to 6500 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.99 1.00

81 to 120 so00 to 7000 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00

121 to 180 5500 to 7500 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.99 1.00

F IGUR E 3-54, tiOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: 48,60 FOR 1% CONDITIONS,

chap 3

53
AC 150/5060-S g/23/83

. . .

HdilRLY CAPACITY BASE C* TOUCH & GO FACTOR r

EXIT FACTOR E

To determine Exit Factor E:

1. Determine exit range for appropriate mix index from table below

2. ?Or arrivalrunway8, dotermine the average number Of l xit8(N) which

are: (a) within appropriate exit range, and (b) separated by at

leaat 7S0 feet

3 . I f N 18 4 or more, Exit ?actor - 1.00

4. 1f.N is less than 4, deternine Exit ?actor from table below for

appropriate mix index and porcent arrivals

nix Index--

Porcent(W3D)

3000 to 5500 0.79 0.86 0.92 0.77 0.85 0.92 0.89 0.98 1.00

0 20 40 '60 80 100 120 140 160 180 51 to 80 3500 to 6500 0.81 0.87 0.93 0.77 0.83 0.91 0.90 0.98 1.00

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D) 8 1 to 120 SO00 to 7000 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00

121 to 180 5500 to 7500 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.99 1.00

FIGURE 3-55, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NO. 53 FOR IFR CONDITIONS.

54

Chap 3
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

FIGURE 3564 RUNWAY OPERATIONS RATE FIGURE 3%B RUNWAY OPERATIONS RATE

0 TO 35 OPERATIONS PER HOUR 36 TO 55 OPERATIONS PER HOUR

250 250

50 50

0 0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

MIX INDEX -- PERCENTK+3D) MIX INDEX -- PERCENTK+3p)

fIGU?E 3% RUNWAY OPERATIONS RATE FIGURE 366D RUNWAY OPERATIONS RATE

56 TO 75 OPERATIONS PER HOUR 76 TO 95 OPERATIONS PER HOUR

250 250

50 50

0 0

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 5 10 15 20 25 3t-i 3 +-I

MIX INDEX -- PERCENTK+3D) MIX INDEX -- PERCENP!r.+31.9

.-

r ! GIltiE ;-frt. liOI,HLY CAPAClTY OF A TAXIWAY iHO5SING AN ACTIVE iiUNWAl WlfH AridIVAL5 1)Ni.Y 1;'~ &Ilt~ P!!)i:; ~j:':"‘:i'i :Fd ,,

Chap 3
AC 150/5060-5 g/23/83

FIGURE 367A RUNWAY OPERAT IOtJS RATE i%lRE 367El RUNWAY OPERATIONS RATE

0 TO 35 OPERATIONS PER HOUR 36 TO 55 OPERATIOPIS PER HOUR

250 250

30 so

0

0 20 40 60 80 lool20 140160

0

180 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

MIX INDEX -- PERCENTK+3D) NIX INDEX -- PERCENTK+3D)

FIGURE 367C RUNWAY OPERATIONS RATE FWRE 367D RUNWAY OPERATIONS RATE

56 TO 75 OPERATIONS PER HOUR 76 TO 95 OPERATIONS PER HOUR

MIX iNDEX-- PERCENTK+3D)

0

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

MIX INDEX -- PERCENTK+3D)

FIGURE 3-57. HOURLY CAPACITY OF A TAXIWAY CROSSING AN ACTIVE RUNWAY WITHOUT ARRIVALS,

Chap 3
9/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

- 4,o

+^w -Ie4

%gj

is a 3,o a

cg

-x

sa

3:

co 210

$Ei

WF

4

a

$2 1.0

35 40 45 50 55 60

HON-WIDEBODY AIRCRAFT GATE OCCUPANCY

0 2 0 40 60 80 100

GATE MIX

(PERCLNT NON-WIDEBODY AIRCRAFT)

\ .

111 G*x S x N = Hourly Capacity1

NUMBER OF GATES ( N )

NOTES:

AVERAGE GATE OCCUPANCY TIME

(1) R -

FOR WIDEBODY AIRCRAFT

AVERAGE GATE OCCUPANCY TIME

FOR NON-WIDEBODY AIRCRAFT

(2) IF OPERATIONS DO NOT INCLUDE WIDEBODY

AIRCRAFT, GATE MIX = 100 AND R = 1.0

35 40 45 5 0 55 60

NON-WIDEBODY AIRCRAFT GATE OCCUPANCY

(MINUT E S )

FIGURE 3-58, !~OURLY CAPACITY OF GATES .

C-P 3

57
AC 150/5060-S g/23/83

8

6

048 068 080 10n

DELAY FACTOR

FIGURE 3-69, AVERAGE AIRCRAFT DELAY IN AN HOUR.

58 Chap 3
DURATION OF OVLRLOAD CHAOC

TWO HoucIm

.

i

1

LO 1.1 1,2 1,3 1.4 1,s

DELAY FACTOR OUR186 ovERLo PnAsE WAY FACTOR DURIRG WERlDAD PMS

0urunoN OF OVCRLOADCWAU

THRCC WOURrn

DURATlDN W OVERIBAD CHAIUC

FOUR HOURm

DURATION Oc OVCRLOAD Pt-tA6C

CIVC HOUR0 40

I

3s

30

2s

20

ls

10

S

I

IAcT

1.0 la1 18.2 1,3 104 1,s

0

LO 101 L2 1.3

I

1.4

I

1,s

00LO 101 L2 1J 1,4 1.5

WAY FACloll OUR11160VER.w) PHASE #lAY FACTOR DURM WE&w) PHASE WAY FACTOR DURM OVERl(Ms PHASE

WE: FOR DISCUSSIQI MD EXMUS Of TM TEm ‘OVERLW RUSE’ MD ‘SAti PERlooS’, SEE PARWAPH 28,C 011 PM 59.1

FIGURE 3-70, AVERAGE AIRCRAFT DELAY DURING SATURATED CONDITIONS~
12/l/93 ’ AC 150/5060-5 CHG 1

ARRIVAL DELAY INOEX

402 ARRIVALS 502 ARRIVALS 602 ARRIVALS

-

s

0.6

#

2 a4

w

3 0.2

NIX INDEX--PERCE?If (c+m NIX INDEX--fERCENl (C+S'D)

EPARTURL DELAY a INIOEX

40% ARRIVALS 9X ARRIVALS 6llI ARRIVALS

0 2040 608oIDo~lm~m

RIX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D)

020406080ltDlp1ull6D~

HIX INDEX--fTRCE!W K+3D)

0 20406080lmm140~m

HIX INDEX--?ERCE!if K+3D>

FIGURE 3-71. DELAY INDICES FOR RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS. 1, 9, 11, 12,31,42,47,48,53,54,66,

68.70.71 FOR VFR CONDITIONS.

ARRIVAL DELAY INDEX = 1.00

D PAR-T-URE DELAY IN orx

602 ARRIVALS

= 1.0

z

*

s

0.6

8

# 0.4

a

Z

2 0.2

23 0 20406030~~NllEN8J

fllX INDEX-PERCEiCT K+3Dl

lie% ARR IVAIS SO% ARRIVALS

0 20% 60~0xn120iulL6o~

Mx INDEX--PEKE?iT K&30)

FiGURE3-72. DEJMY !NDICES tO RRUNWAY-USEWWAM NOS.2.32~33,67,72,?‘3,87,aa~C~~FFi CONDITIONS.

Chap 3

61
AC 150/5060-5 CHG 2 12!li’95

ARRIVAL OEtAY tNDEX = t.00

0 otx

40% ARRIVALS 50% ARRIVALS

2 1.0

E

= 0.8

gY

NIX IMEG-PERCE?U K+3D)

L

FIGURE 3-73. DEiAY INDICES FOR RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NO. 3 FOR VFFi CONDITIONS.

ARRIVAL DiELAY-lNDE% = 1.00

DEPARTURE DELAY INDEX

40% ARRIVALS 9% ARRIVALS 60% iiRR1VAi.S

% 0.2

'2 0 2040 60801DDzpMlHla

11X INDEX--PERCENT (C+3D)

FIGURE 3-74. DEMY iNDiCES FOR RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS. $,74,75,85,86.89.

90, 100. 101 FOR VFR CONDITIONS.

62 Chap 3
12: Ii95 AC 150/5060-5 CHG 3

ARRIVAL DELAY tNOEX

40% ARRIVALS SO2 ARRIVALS 60% itRRIVALS

a 1.0

Yu

x 0.8 8

L

FOR 3/c iUft0 ot LO OR roRz s

ADt - 1.0 t k I L 1 Z

0 2040 608olmKo1~mm = 0.2

MX INDEX--PE!KENT K+3D)

DEPARTURE “DELAY tf?JOEX = t.00

FIGURE 3-75. DELAY INDICES FOR’RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS. 5,7,76,91 FOR VF2 CONDITIONS.

ARRIVAL DELAY ItJOEX

uz ARRIVALS 502 ARRIVACS 6(1x ARRIVALS

= 0.8

g

- 0.6

s

= 0.8 k!! L

0 EPARTURE DELAY I N

50% ARRIVALS

OEX

60% ARRIVALS

z 0.6

c I

mu o/c RATro o? 0 m 1.3

1.0 I I

rm olc UTIO ot d m 1,s

301 - 1.0 I I

FIGURE 3-76. DELAY INDICES FOR RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS. 13,15 FOR VFR CONDITIONS.

63 Chap 3
AC 150/5060-5 CHG 2 E/1/95

ARRIVAL DELAY tNQVC

4U% ARRIVALS 50% ARRIVALS 60% ARRIVALS

= 1.0

z 0.6

t I ?OR D/C MT70 O? 0 m 1.5

AD1 - 1.0 ii I I

d 0.4

wb

= 0.2

OEPARTURE DELAY IN

40% ARRIVALS SO% ARRIVALS

ocx

60% ARR1W.S

s 1.0

n

s 1.0

s

E -0.8

s

0 20406080100KDltro160m

!llX INDEX--PERCENT (MD)

FIGURE 3-77. DEiAY INDICES FOR RUNWAY-USE D~AG~M NOS. 16,79,94 FOR VFR CONDITIONS.

ARRIVAL DELAY INOEX

40% ARRIVALS 50% ARRIVALS 60% ARRIVALS

= 0.8

g

= 0.8 8

L

6 0.6 * 0.6

s

s

AD1 * 1.0 iii I I d 0.4

w

g 0.2

nix It(MX--PERCENT (CGD)

DEPARTURE DELAY INDEX

40% ARRIVAK 50% ARRIVALS 60% ARRIVALS

= 0.8

g

ts. 0.8

ss 0.6 * 0.6 s 0.6

5

8

0 20406080100~14l~m

RIX IREX--PERCENT (C+3D)

0 20406080IulIp1~mm

?!IX INDEX--PERCENT 03t))

FiGURE 3-78. DELAY INDICES FOR RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS. 18,19,21,22,23,77,78,92,93 FOR VFR CONDITIONS.

64 Chap 3
lUU95 AC 150/5060-5 CHG2

ARRIVAL DELAY INDEX

402 ARRIVALS

c 1.0

SUZ ARRIVALS

9 = 1.0

z ,9

3 0.8 =

3

0.8

5 0.6 g

s

0.6

B a

wd 0.4 d 0.4

7 0.2 w

Z

2 0.2 NIX INDEX--fmcENT Km) NIX Imla--PERCENT 20 40 6080

(MD)

aDla1ulmm

nrx IHEX--ERcEHT (C+3D)

DEPARTURt DELAY tNOEX

2 1.0 sax ARRIVALS

za 2= 1.0 lo0

u

0.8 :

2i

5 0.6 8

0.8 z

E

0.8

s :

8 s

0.6 z 0.6

8

s

# 0.4 2 0.4

a

& 0.4

4 Z

iii 0.2 s

Z

0m40608010Dlp1~160181~~ 0.2 3 0.2

!ux UmEx--PERCEIIT K+3ll) RIX INIEX--3mENT (C+3D) 8

RIX INDEX--PERCENT (C+m

FiGURE 3-79. DEtAY INDICES FOR RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS. 24,27 FOR VFR CONDITjONS.

ARRIVAL OCLAY INDEX

2 1.0 9 = 1.0

- s

4 0.8 =

5 0.6 ‘g *

0.8

0.6

u

s

d 0.4

B

w < 0.4

g 0.2 gw 0.2

MX INDEX--PERCENT (C+JDl NIX INDa--Km K+3ll)* NIX INDEX--PERCENT (C+3Dl

DCPARTURC DELAY INDEX

so% ARRIvAu

'VX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D) 0 20~60801001201ullso181

FflX INDEX--%RCENT K+3Dl

FIGURE 3.80. DEtAY INDICES FOR RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS. Z&28.41,82,97 FOR VFR CONDITIONS.

Chap 3 65
AC 150/5060-5 CHG 2 12/l/95

ARRIVAL OCtAY INDEX

402 ARRIVALS 502 ARRIVALS 602 ARRIVALS

“, 1.0

9

3z 0.8

z

5

0.6

24

d 0.4

w

g 0.2

0 0 20 40 6080 lrfJl2o1ull6om

MX INDEH’ERCEU K+30) HIX INIlE&-PERCENT K+3D) I4 I X INDEX-PERCENT (C+3D)

DEPARTURE DELAY INDEX

-

= 1.0

S

8= 0.8

L-

* 0.6

5

Ed

3 0.4

Z

3 0.2

# 0 2uw,wsolalml4olellao#

MX INEX--PERCE?iT K+3D) RIX INDEX-PERCEKI’ (C+fD)

FiGURE 341. DELAY INDICES FOR RUNWAY-USE DlAGRM NO. 29 FOR VFR CONDITIOf’JS.

ARRIVAL DELAY INDEX * 1.00

.

DEPARTURE OELAY INDEX

FIGURE 3-82. DELAY INDICES FOR RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS. 34,35 FOR VFR CONDITIONS66 chap 3
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

ARRIVAL -DELAY

- ---.-

1NOEX

40% ARRIVALS 50% ARRIVALS 6OZ ARRIVALS

= 1.0

g

w 0.6

s

x

d 0.4

w IOI D/C RAnd 01 0.6 OR n#r

ADI - 1.0

4 I I 1 I I I A 1

0 2040 6080100l2D1rl)l6o18)

VIX INDEX--PERCENT(MD)

0 20406080lamo140l6D18)

NIX INDEX--PERCENTK+3D)

0 20406080l@uo1~Itiom

NIX INDEX--PERCENT(C+pD)

,PARTURE OELAV INDEX

40% ARRIVALS 50% ARRIVALS

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

&

I 1 +

I 1 . I I

~ FOR D/t RATIO OF 0.6 OR mRE

s 0.6

DDI - 1.0

0.21 ' ' ' ' n ' ' 1 1

0 20406c80lml2o14018018)

MIX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D)

0 2040 6080loDlzo140m18)

MIX INDEX--PERCENT (MD)

020406080lml2o1~mm

YIX INDEX--PERCENTK+3D)

FIGURE 3-83, DELAY' INDICES FOR RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: 36-38 FOR VFR CONDITIONS.

ARRIVAL DELAY iNDEX

40% ARRIVALS 50% ARRIVALS 60% ARRIVALS

. . . . - - POR DtC RATIO OF 1.2 OR lQRt

0 2040 6@80ulo1201u)16018)

FOR DfC RATIO OF 1.2 OR MORE

AD1 - 1.0

0 20 40 60 80 lOD120140160183

IIIX INKX--PERCENT K+3D) NIXINDEX--PERCENT K+3D) MIX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D)

DEPARTURE DELAY INDEX

40% ARRIVALS SO!: ARRIVALS 60% ARRIVALS

: 016

s

8

L& 0,4

L 1 FOR D/C RATIO OF 0.8 OR MORE1 I x

II ““”1.0 DDI- 1 I G=

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

0.2

160 180

MIX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D)

&

111’--M DDI - 1.0 s

2 0.2

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 MI 160 18) 8

MIX INDEX--PERCENT W3D)

0 20406080ulo1201401~~

flIX INDEX--PERCENTK+3D)

FIGURE 3-84, DELAY INDICES FOR RUNWAI-USE DIAGRAM NOS,: 39,110 FOR VFK CONDITIONS,

3
AC 150/5060-S g/23/83

ARRIVAL DELAY INDEX

40x ARRIVALS 50% ARRIVALS 60% ARRIVALS

f= 1.0

3

x 0.8

g

a t r \ L

l

I

w

I 1 . - 1 . - 1

mu D/C uno O? 0 To 1.5

c AD1 - 1.0

L

c

t I FOR D/C -RATIO OF 1.4 OR MORE

AD1 - 1.0 I I

~~ -

0 2040 6080lall2o140m18) 0 20 40 60 80 lW2O140180~

MIX INDEX--PERCENT (MD) NIX INSEX-PERCENT K+fD) NIX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D)

EPARTURE DELAY INDEX

40% ARRIVALS SO% ARRIVALS 60% ARRIVALS

x 0.8 1

s+ 0.6

3 0.8

s

2 0.6

dor

ii!!

1

iii

iif

0.4

&

= 0.2

El

FOE D/C RATIO OF 1.0 OR MDRX

Do1 - 1.0

v a I a L I : _

0 20406080lamm4OKo18)

MIX INDEX--PERCENT (MD)

I

20

%

.z

0 20406080mIp14018019)

NIX INDEX--PERCENT(MD)

0 20406080m~140mm

NIX INDEX--PERCENT (MD)

huRE 3-85, DELAY INDICES FOR RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: 43,49,55,61 FOR WR CONDITIONS

AR

40% ARRIVALS

RIWtL DELAY INDEX

Sax ARRIVALS 6OZ ARRIVALS

f= LO

3

f

0.8

FOR D/C RATIO O? 1.4 OR WRE

ADI - 1.0

. 1 1 1 R 1 I _ ,

020406080100lpltlom18)

C’lIX Irn--PERCENT K+3D)

0 20406080mIp1rl)180m

RIX MM--PERCENT K+3D)

0 2040 608fmn~14018018

MIX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D)

DEPARTURE DELAY INDEX

40% ARRIVALS 50% ARRIVALS 60% ARRIVALS

b ! I I .

, FOU D/C RATIO W 1.0 OR noRt

DDI - 1.0

* IrrlAA,,

00 20406080mm1~16D~ 20406080mm1umiolm

MIX INDEX--PERCENT MIX INDEX--PERCENT (C+3In (C+3D)

0 20406080mm1u)160181

MIX INDEX--f'ERCEKl (MD)

0 20406080~12D140m180

MXINDEX--PERCENT (MD)

Fr GURE 3-85, D ELAY INDICES FOR RUNWAY - USE DIAGRAM NOS.: 44-46,W52,53-58,&Z-64 FOR VFK CONDITIONS.

Chap 3
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

ARRIVAL DELAY INDEX

40% ARRIVALS 50% ARRIVALS 60% ARRIVALS

* 0.6 9

x

s 0.4

w

D/C RATIO

1.4 OR nom

1.2 I I

ycl.0 OR LESS

MX INEX--PERCENT K+3D) NIX INIW-PERCENT (MD) HIX INDEX--PERCENT(MD)

DEPARTURE DELAY INDEX

40% ARRIVALS 50% ARRIVALS 60% ARRIVALS

0 2040 6080loo12014016018

MIX INDEX--f’ERCENT (MD)

?OU D/C RATIO O? 1.0 OR MORE

.

DDI - 1.0

4 - ' ' ' ' A b

0 2040 6080lamo-1u)16018)

NIX INDEX--PERCENT (MD)

0 20406080mlp14016Dm

MIX INKX-PERCENT (MD)

FIGURE 3-87, DELAY INDICES FOR RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: 59,60,65 FOR VFR CONDITIONS,

ARRIVAL DELAY INDEX

40% ARRIVALS 50% ARRIVALS 602 ARRIVALS

c 4

.

I

.

I

I’011 D/C RATIO OF 0 TO 1.5 L

AD1 - 1.0

r

.

L 1 A 4

0 20 40 60 80 loo I20 140160 18)

f'% INDEX--PERCENT W3D)

f= 1.0

g

x 0.8

x

LW

s 0.8

f

-

w 0.6

4

W

; 0.4

w

* 0.6 4

24

-l 0.4

.

FOR D/C RATIO OF 1.2 OR MORE 5

AD1 - 1.0

02040 60801001201u)160~

MIX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D)

-

2 0.2 0 20406080 loo120140160180

NIX INDEX--PERCENT (MD)

DEPARTURE DELAY INDEX

40% ARRIVALS 50% ARRIVALS 60% ARR I VALS

t I

FOR D/C RATIO OF 1.0 OR MORE

DDI - 1.0 I I

1

0 20 40 60 80 loo 120 140 160 180

MIX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D)

0 20 4 0 60 80 lC0 120 140 160 18

"l1X INDEX--PERCENTK+3D>

0 20 4 0 60 8 0 100 120 140 160 18

MIX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D)

FIGURE 5-88. D ELAY INDId FOR RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: i30,81,95.( OR VFH CONDITIONS,

chap 3

69
AC 150/5060-5 g/23/83

ARRIVAL DELAY INDEX = 1.00

DEPARTURE DELAY INDEX

40% ARRIVALS 50% ARRIVALS 60% ARRIVALS

b 20 40 60 80 lO0 120 140 l60 180

MIX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D)

&o 20406080m120140160180

MIX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D)

020406080~lptimti

RIX INDEX-PERCENT (MD)

: IGURE s-89, &LAY INDICE .S FOR RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: 83,84,98,919,102 FOR VFR CONDITIONS.

s 0.6

s

K

-j Ot4

Jg 0.2

40% ARRIVALS

0 20 40 60 80 100 l2014Ol@ll80

MIX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D)

ARRIVAL DELAY INDEX

- 50% ARRIVALS

NIX INDEX--PERCENTK+3D)

60% ARRIVALS

l

.

1 I . 1 1 r

FOR D/C RATIO OF 0 TO 1.5

0

T

20 40 60 80 100120140180180

MIX INDEX--PERCENT W3D)

DEPARTURE DELAY INDEX

40% ARRIVALS 50% ARRIVALS 60% ARRIVALS

;! 20 4~ 60 80 100 120 140 ifa 18

“?I:! JNDF.X- -?FRCENT K+3D)

0 20 40 6080100120140160l8i

FIIX INDEX--PERCENT(MD)

0 20406080lm1201rlo160183

MIX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D)

* IG;J f p;& ;E. .+.: ;NDICES F9R i<‘JNWAY-USE DIAGRAH NOS.: 1,53,54 FOR IFR CONDSTIONS.

Chap 3
12/1/95 AC 150/5060-5 CHG 3

ARRIVAL DELAY INDE% = LOO

DEPARTURE DELAY INDEX

MX ARRIVALS 50% ARR-IVALj 60% ARRIVALS

= 1.0

Q

= 1.0

Q

piJ +( 0.8 =

is

0.8

w

25

0.6 ;: 0.6

x

15

x

ii! 0.4 2 0.4

go2

Z

s 0.2

x

•020406080m~l~m~~

RIX !NDEx--PERCENT tc+m

0 20406080ltDlp1~180l&l~

MIX INDEX--f’ERCENl CC+rO> RIX INIEX--PERCENT tc+m

FlGURE 3-91. DELAY INDICES FOR RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS. 2,3,5,9,32 - 3537 - 43,49,55,61 - 68,

72.74,76,77,79,80,82-85,87089,91,92,94,95,97- 100,102 FOR IFR CONDITIONS.

.

ARRIVAL t-‘LAY INDEX = I.00

DEPARTURE DELAY INDEX

9% ARRIVALS

= 1.0

60% ARRIVALS

Ia

=

E!

0.8

E:

3

0.6

x

u 0.4

s

g 0.2

8 *20406080Mm140150m~ 0 204060801DO1201~18018)

51X IWDEX-PERCENT K+3D) BIX INDEX-PERCfNT (MD) MX INDEX-PERCEWT (C+3D>

FIGURE 3-92. DELAY INDICES FOR RUNWAY-USE DlAGiiAM NOS. 4,75,90 FOR IFR CONDITIONS.

Chap 3
AC 150/5060-5 CHG 1

E/1/95

ARRIVAL DELAY tNDEX = I.00

DEPARTURE DELAY INDEX

40% ARRIVALS SO% ARRIVALS 60% ARRIVALS

2 1.0

=

= 0.8 iii 1: W

* 0.6

s

a

s 0.4

Z

3 0.2

M BIX INDEX--PERCE?lT U33D)

FIGURE J-93. DELAY INDICES FOR RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NO. 7 FOR IFR CONDITIONS.

ARRIVAL DELAY INDEX

= 1.0

3

x 0.8

'g

w 0.6

15

8

d 0.4

w

Qc 4 0.2

0 20 40 60 80 XII 12olu) 160 i81’ 0 204060801Ixl120ltro160180 0 20 40 6080 llIl1201~16018)

I”UX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D> MX INDEX--PERCENT (C+3D) MIX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D)

DEPARTURE ‘DELAY INDEX

40% ARRIVALS 50% ARRIVALS

ma P/C Ufln .rF 3 33 t.5

3PT - : * .-

20.4, ; w ._ I . ; a I ! t

’ 2 0-t k : b

! f I Z

1 ma 3/c Mm- OF 3.0 OR .!mRl! ;

bc

a

2 3.2 L , 1 s

I 301 - I.9 I ‘at

ki 0 20 Nl 50 80 lfll izo Ml Bl

0.2.

Bl 2 0

1 1 t 1 t 1 + 2

20 a6030 iali2olu)~~~~

0.2

0 204060801001201~160m

‘lrIX !!lDEx--‘E~Cplr CCdD, 31x INDEX--wCE3T (cq) i’!IX INDEX--PERCE!lT iC+3D)

FIGURE 3-94. DELAY INDICES FOR RUNWAY&SE DIAGRAM NO. 8 FOR IFR CONDITIONS.

72 Chap 3
n/1/95 AC 150/5060-5 CHG 2

ARRfVAL OFfLAY INOEX * I.00

DEPARTURE DELAY INDEX

60% ARRIVALS

@JfTj

50X ARRIVALS

FIGURE 3.95. DEMY INDICES FOR RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS. 11,21,29,70,71 FOR IFR CONDITIONS.

ARRIVAL DELAY ItdDEX

4iF ARRIVALS 502 ARRIVALS 6UZ ARRIVALS

= 1.0

g

= 1.0

3

* 0.8 *

L-

.

. . . . . . . . . . . .

- . . . . . . . . .

-. I... ..- . . ‘:-I’ I

b I i ;:.;...i ..,.. -

.

a

If .

I I..-

- -

WC RAtw l

1.4 01 mu -

I I 1.1- 9

/ f í - ë: -

c,

II

i ’ 1.0 OR tus -w I

I I 1 I 1 i

. I L l

= 0.8 H

-

L

= 0.8 x

-L

* 0.6

s

8

;;t 0.4

-

w

3 0.2

Nix MIEX--PERCENT (C+XI)

DEPARTURE DELAY INDEX

Wf ARR IVALS 50X ARRIVALS 602 ARR I VALS

-

+ 0.6

s

x

w 0.4

a

020406080I(lDf2o1uHfou

RtX INEX--PERCENT (MD>

0 20406080lfIl~1~160m

NIX MDEXG’ERCENT <C+3D)

FIGURE 3-96. DEIAY INDICES FOR RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NO. 12 FOR IFR CONDITIONS.

Chap 3
AC 150/5060-5 CHG 3 12/l/93

ARRIVAi DELAY INDEX = 1’.00

EPARTURE DELAY JN0EX

5Ot ARRIVALS 60x ARRIVALS

g 1.0

=

= 0.8

g

= 0.6

2

s 0.4

a

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2 020406080~~1uli6om

NIX INDEX--PERCE?VT K+3DI

0 20406080100lp1ul160m

NIX INDEX--PERCUCT K+3D)

ARRIVAL DELAY INDEX

4UZ ARRIVALS Sax ARRIVALS 602 ARRrvALs

I 1.0

s

8= 0.8

1

2 0.6

I I I

.

PARTURE DELAY IN OEX

402 ARRlvAK 92 ARRIVALS 60x ARRIVALS 2 1.0

S

1.0

0.8

0.6

iii! 0.8

ClIX INDEX--PERCENT (MD,

FIGURE 3-98. DELAY INOICES FOR RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: 15.28 FOR IFR CONOITIONS

74 -P3
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-5

c

Chap 3

s 1.0

s

x 0.8

p

D

40% ARRIVALS

ARRIVAL DELAY INDEX = 1.00

IOI D/C RATIO OI 1.0 OR loIt

DDI - 1.0

l l

02040 6080lamo1~180lao

51x INDEX--PERCENT(MD)

EPARTURE DELAV IN

50% ARRIVALS

h 1.0

%

8

0.8

* 0.6

9

0 0 20406080lalnmo16018)

MIX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D)

E X

60% ARRIVALS

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0 20406080tim140mm

11X INDEX--PERm K+3D)

FIGURE 3-99, DELAY INDICES FOR RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: 18,22,26,31,36,44-46,50-52,56-58 FOR IFR CONDITIONS,

40% ARRIVALS 50% ARRIVALS

1.0

0.8

0.6

004

0.2

ARRIVAL PELAV INDEX I 1.00

0 2040 6080mlzo140160180~

MIX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D)

PARTURE DELAY IN

0 20 40 6080lamo14016D180

MIX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D)

DEX

60% ARRIVALS

020406080100m140180m

MIX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D)

FIGURE 3-100, DELAY INDICES FOR RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS.: 19,23 FOR IFK CONDITIONS.

75
AC 150/5060-5 g/23/83

.

ARRIVAL DELAY IN-X = 1.00

DEPARTURE DELAY INDEX

40% ARRIVALS 50% ARRIVALS 60% ARRIVALS

z1 1.0

8

2E 0.8

* 0.6

s

E#

# 0.4

s

3 0.2

led MIX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D) MIX INDEX--PERCENT (MD) MIX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D)

.

FIGURE 3-101, DELAY INDICES FOR RUNWAY-USE DlAGRAM No%: 78,81,86,93,96,101 FOR IFR CONDITIONS,

ARRIVAL DELAY INDEX

50% ARRIVALS 60% ARRIVALS

r; 1.0

s

8= 0.8

LW

w 096

s

i!!!

.& 0@4

w

z

so.2

0 20 40 6080 lfW2OlUI16018)

MIX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D) NIX INDEX--PERCENT <MD> MIX INDEX--PERCE?jl tC+3D>

DEPARTURE DELAY INDEX

F

&j 0.4 L& 0.4

3 0.2

z

x 0

s 0.2

z

2040 6080loo12010l6o180~ 0

2 0.2

0 204060801001201401601%)

MIX INDEX--PERCENT (MD)

20406080laJ120140160181~

MIX INDEX--PERCENT K+3D) MCX INDEX--PERCENTW3D)

FIGURE j-102, &LAY INDICES FOR HUNYAY-USE. DIAGHAPI NOS.: Q/,U,b9,60 1 OR IFR CONDITIONS ,

-

Chap 3
g/23/83

CHAPTER 4. SPECIAL APPLICATIONS

AC 150/5060-S

4-l. GENERAL. This chapter provides calculations of runway capacity for situations

involving PVC conditions, the absence of radar coverage and/or II& and airports

with one runway or a runway restricted to small aircraft. Appendix 3 contains

examples of these calculationsk

4-2. PVC CONDITIONS. Runway hourly capacity in PVC conditions is reduced by

increased in-trail separations of approaches and departures and increased runway

occupancy times. Calculate PVC runway component hourly capacity as follows:

a. Select the runway-use configuration in figure 4-1 which best represents

the airport and identify the'figure number for determining capacity in PVC conditions, To adjust for staggered thresholds, see paragraph 4-6.

b 0 Determine the percent of class C and D aircraft and calculate the mix

index.

c. Determine the percent arrivals.

d Determine the runway hourly capacity from the figure identified in

paragraih b above.

4-3. ABSENCE OF RADAR COVERAGE OR ILS. mcept for single runway airports used

almost exclusively by class A and B aircraft (which are covered in paragraph 4-5),

calculate the hourly capacity of the runway component in the absence of radar

coverage or ILS as follows:

a. Select the runway-use configuration in figure 4-1 which best represents

the airport and identify the figure number for determining capacity with an inoperative navaid.

b Determine whether the radar or the ILS is operative and determine whether

a straiiht-in or a circling approach is authorized.

c. Determine the percent of class C and D aircraft and calculate the mix

index.

d htermine the runway hakly capacity from the figure identified in

paragraph b above.

4-4. PARALLEL RUNWAY AIRPORTS WITH ONE RUNWAYRESTRI~EDTOUSEBYSM&LAIRCRAFT.

Calculate the hourly capacity of a parallel runway configuration when one of the

runways is unable to accommodate class C and D aircraft as follows:

a. Select the runway-use configuration in figure 4-1 which best represents

the airport and identify the figure number for determining capacity in restricted

runway use. To adjust for staggered thresholds, see paragraph 4-6.

b. Determine the percent of class C and D aircraft and calculate the mix

index.

c. Determine the percent arrivals.

Chap 4

Para 4-1
AC 150/5060-5 g/23/83

e. Determine the runway hourly capacity from the figure identified in

paragraph b above.

4-5. SINGLE RUNWAY AIRPORT--SNRLL AIRCRAFT ONLY. Calculate the capacity of a small

airport used almost exclusively by Class A and B aircraft without radar coverage or

ILS as follows:

a. Conditions.

(1) The airport is used almost exclusively by Class A and B aircraft.

(2) The airport does not have radar coverge or an ILS, but it has an

approved approach procedure.

(3) Arrivals equal departures.

(4) There are no airspace limitations affecting runway use.

b 0 CapacityCalculations.

(1) Select the airport configuration from figure 4-26 that best represents the airport.

(2), Determine the percent of touch-and-go operations.

(3) Ibead the range of hourly VFR and IFR capacities from figure 4-26.

4-6. THRESHOLD STAGGER. FM ATC procedures permit simultanears departures and

simultaneousdeparture--arrival operations on parallel runways spaced 2,500 feet

apart with even thresholds and at lesser/greater separations if the thresholds are

staggered. When thresholds are staggered 8 the equivalent unstaggered separation is

calculated increasing or decreasing the actual separation depending upon whether the

arriving aircraft is approaching the near’ or faic threshold. ‘Stagger adjustments are

only applicable when the parallel runway separations that are at least 1000 feet

apart and less than 4300 feet apart.

a. Calculation.

(1) If the approaches are to the near threshold and the separation is

less than 4299 feet, the equivalent separation is the actual separation increased by

100 feet for each 500 feet of threshold stagger up to a maximum of 4299 feet.

(2) If the approaches are to the far threshold and the -paration is

greater than 1000 feet, the equivalent separation iS the actual separartion

decreased by 100 feet for each 500 feet of threshold stagger down to a minimum of

703 feet..

18

cm@4

mr 4-4
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-s

b

runway&e

Application. Apply the equivalent separation to determine which parallel

configuration to use. Note: the calculation for equivalency need only

determine whether the equivalent runway separation is2500 feet or greater or 2499

feet .or less.

c. Examples.

case 1. Staggered thresholds, approaches to near threshold,

L+- 1000 feet m-----wj 24b0 feet

(1000/500)~2 - 200

Separation for equivalency is increased by 200 feet

2400 + 200 - 2600 feet

case 2. Staggered thresholds, approaches to far threshold.

LlOOO feet41 2500 feet

(-1000/500)~2 --200

Sepatation for equivalency is decreased by 200 feet

2500 - 200 - 2300 feet

-P4

Parra I-6 79 .
AC 150/5060-S g/23/83

w Figure No. for Capacity

Poor 0 Restricted

Diagi Runway Spacing Visibility Inoperative Runway-use

Runway-use Diagram No. L

k (S) in feet Conditions Navaids 1 IFR

+

*

+ l- NA 49 2 4-15 - -

.

b S 6 2a ' 700 to 2499 4- 3 I 4-16 - -

b + 2b 2500 or more 4- 4

m 1

+ + b 3 700 to 2499 4- 3 4-16 - -

s I

*

 4 2500 or more 4- 5

tl ++ I 6 5 2500 700 to to 2499 2999 4-I- 3 6 I I 4-16 - -

S 7 I. 3000 to 4299 1

+ 4 4300 or more ’ 4- 8

+ + c 9 700 to 10 2500 to 24999 4-a 93 4-17 ' 4-21 s '1 4-16

11 3000 to

t )t' 12 4300 or

4299 4-10 4-18

more 4-11 . 4-22

4

t) +

t

;

+ c 4-

28 : 2500 to 3499 4-23

- - 4-19

3500 or more 4-24

3500 or more. ' - - 4-20 4-25

/

%

1

A 43646 Oto 1999 0 4-12 1

i--w+%Y :*-j4464745648 5000 2000 8000 4999 to to : 8000 to i 4-13 4-14 1 4-15 - -

% A 49C52 0 1999 to 0

I !

4-12

<%Y ty-f%+SO&53 : 5lc5420005000 4999 8000 toto

I

to 1 4-14 4-13

c = 700' to2499'

+

= Type of operation that can 0ccuIc.

-- wlmmy used only w A and B aircraft.

IFigure 4-l. Special application8
g/23/83 Ac 150/5060-S

CAPACITY IN PVC

loo -

1

I . .

1 /+PERCHCT -PERCENT ARR1W.S ARRIVALS

1

I

1 1

1

0, L I 1

0 20 40 60 80100i20140160160 80100i20140160180

MIX Irn- PERCENT K+3D)

FIGURE G--2, HOURLY CAQAC I TY OF RUNWAYTUSE

DIAGRAM NO. 1,

CAPACITY INPVC

I .:

.

1 APERCENT ARRI ‘VMS

~~~~

F I GURE 4-4, HOURLY CAPAC jfY OF RUNWAY-USE

DIAGRAM NO, 2s.

h e

CAPACITY IN PVC

90

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D)

I

FIGURE 4-3, HOURLY CAPACI TV OF RUNWAY-USE

DIAGRAM NOS. 2A, 3, 5, 9,

4

.CAPACITY IN PVC

NIX INEX -- PERcENr (MD)

I 1

~IGUM 4-5. HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNUAY-USE

DIAGRAM NO. 4.

/

Chap 4
AC, 150/5060-S g/23/83

CAPACITY IN PVC

100

90

IVALS

8 0

2 70

i=s

-a 60

s

4 ow

* P

d r

s

dM

z!

2

30

2Ol

10 ’

0, * 0 20 40 60 80 loo 120 140 160 180

MIX IEX -- PERCEKT K+3D)

FIGURE 4-5, HOURLY CAPACITY O F RUNWAY-USE

DIAGRAM NO, 6,

CAPACITY IN PVC

NIX IMEX -- PERCENT K+3D)

FIGURE 4-8, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE

DIAGRAM NO, 8,

CAPACITY IN PVC

10

‘0, 1 A I I 1

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

NIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D)

FIGURE 4-7, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE

DIAGRAM NO. 7,

CAPACITY IN PVC

FIGURE q-9, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USC .

DIAGRAM NO. 10,
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

m

l

ha

CAPACITY IN PVC

60 I

4&

30

20

10

0, 1 A

0 20 40 60 80 loo 120 140 160180

NIX INMX -- PERCENT (MD)

FIGURE 4-10, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE

DIAGRAM No. 11,

CAPACITY INPVC

20,0

20

.

40 60 80 100 l20 140 160 la

NIX 1m -- PERCENT K+3D)

I

FIGURE 4-L HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE

DIAGRAM itO. 12,’

CAPACITY IN PVC

IV&S

0 20 40 60 80 loo 120 140 160 180

MIX mu -- PERCENT (C+3D)

FIGURE+-12. HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE

DIAGRAM NOS. 43, 45, 49, 52,

/

k

CAPACITY IN PVC

IVALS

0 40 60 80 loo 120 143 160 180

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3Dl

L

FIGURE 4-13, HOURLY CAPAC I TY OF RUNWAY-USF.

DIAGRAM NOS. 44, 47, 50, 53,

a3

(-P 4
AC 150/5060-S g/23/83 ’

CAPACITY IN PVC

I

MIX INDEX -- PERCENTUMD)

I

I

FIGURE 4-14. HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE

DIACRAH NOS. 45, 48, 51, 54, I

Chap 4
9123183 AC 150/5060-S

FIGURE A3-2A.

HOURLY CAPACITY IN RADAR ENVIRONMENT

too* 7 d

901 . 1 . .

- CTMIGHT-IN APPROACH

80

2 70

ES

2 % 6o

s

itis

32

5%

s 6 40

%

- 30

FIGURE AJ-2B 8

HOURLY CAPACITY INNONRADAR ENVIRMKNT

lOO* 7 . l

,

901 \

* SlRAI6HT-IN APPROACW

80 1

,20

10

Oo1120 40 11 60 80 11 100 12011140 160 1 180 I

MIX INDEX -- . PERCENT (MD> nrx INDEX -- PERCENT(MD)

F 1 GURE 4-15, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS. 1, 43-54,

FIGURE AE3A o

HOURLY CAPACITY IN RADAR ENVIRONRENt

FIGURE A3-3B,

HOURLY CAPACITY INNONRADAR ENVIROMENT

lOO* 7 9

r 1 . .

-- StRA I WI’- SN APPROACH

8oL L .

I I

0 20 40 80 100 120 140 160 180 01‘0

1 I I

20 40 60 801om2o140160180’

NIX INDEX -- PERCENT (MD) I’lIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3Dl

FIGURE 4-l:. HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE DIAGRAM NOS. 2A, 2B, 3-12,

Chap 4
AC 150/5060-S g/23/83

RUNWAY ESTRICTED USE INVfR

VALS

FIGURE 4-17, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE

DIAGRAM NO. 9,

RUNWAY RESTRICTED USE IN VFR

60,

304 i

0 20 40 60 80 100 120.140(160‘180

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT (MD)

VALS

FIGURE 4-19, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNYAY-USE

DIAGRM NO% 28, 2%

RUNWAY RESTRICTED USE IN VFR

RUNWAY RESTRICTED USE IN VFR

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D)
g/23/83 &c 150/5060-S

1

RUNWAY RESTRICTED USE IN IFR

.oot * l m1

9ok I I (

I 1

r-PERCENT -PERCENT ARRIV

40 -

I 1

10 1

04ol 1 1 ’1 A’ 1 I ’ ,J

0 20 40 60 80100 120140160180

, MIX INDEX-- PERCENT K+3D)

‘ALS

FIGURE 4-21, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE

DIAGRAM NOS. 9, 10, 11,

RUMAY RESTRICTED USE IN IFR

- PERCENT ARRIVALS

k ,

-if

s 30,

nn

al 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1

0 20 40 60 80100120140160180

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D)

FIGURE 4-23, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE

DIAGRAM NO. 28,

Chap 4

RUNWAY RESTRICTED USE IN IFR

200, .

180 I 3

-PERCENT ARRIVALS

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D)

FIGURE 4-22, HOURLY CAPAC I TY OF RUNWAY-USE

\ DIAGRAM NOti 12.

/

\

RUNWAY RESTRICTED USE Ifi IFR

f VALS

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

MIX INDEX -- PERCENT K+3D)

I

FIGURE 4-24. qOURLY CAPACITY W RUNWAY-USE

DIAGRAM NO. 2% .

I

83
HOURLY CAPACITY

(OPERATIONS PER HOUR)
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-5

CONFIG,

HOURLY CAPACITY IN VFR HOURLY I

No,

AIRFIELD CONFIGURATION PERCENT TOUCH-AND-GO CAPAC ITY . 1

0 TO 25 26 TO 50 IN IFR -I

;y ;F A?

( OPERATIONS PER HOUR )

l 54 TO 66 66 TO 85 20 TO 24

2 'T 'T LT LT 591072 '72~092 20~024

3 iA& LAA Lq 40 TO 50 50 TO 67 20 TO 24

4 IL? cT r! 82 TO 97 97 TO 117 20 TO 24

5 77 71 TO 85 85 TO lO6 20 TO 24

B

6 '3 'T LT 60 TO 72 72 TO 92 20 TO 24

clB BASING AREA

DIRECTION OFOFWWION

w TURNAR0UND

Figure 4-26. Huxly capacity of single runway airports, without radar coverage

01: US, servingsmall aircraft only.

Chap 4

89 (and 90)
I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

1

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

121 l/95 AC 150/5060-5 CHG 2

CHAPTER 5. COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR AIRPORT CAPACITY AND AIRCRAFT DELAY

S-1. GENERAL. This chapter identifies computer models for determinin g airport capacity, aircraft deiay, and the

sensitivity of a proposed physical/operational change to an airport or air t&c procedure.

5-2 SIMULATION MODEL (STMMODJ SIMMOD is a simulation model used by &e FM, airlines, airports,

a&item, and engineers to design airport impiovements, calculate travel times and flow rates for an airport or an &port

component, and/or devefop procedural alternatives for domestic and international air traffic management, in&&g the

adjacent airspace. Specific applications of the SIMMOD mode1 range from studies of a single runway airport with its

network of taxiway and gates, to studies of terminal areas having multiple airports with complex airspace routings.

a. SIMMOD addresses both the physical design and procedural aspects of all air traffic operations, allowing

decision-makers to determine projected benefits and impacts in terms of airport capacity and in aircraft travel time, delay,

and fuel consumption. The model incorporates the FAA’s Integrated Noise Model (INM) as a post-processing function,

alIowing us& to determine the impact of aircraft noise in the-planning process. SIMMOD is available in two versions

which include magnetic media, manuals, and all required software licenses and libraries. The Summagraphics MG-3648

36”~ 48” or Summagraphics Professional 12”~ 18” digitizer, and CAD/CAM (Autocad) are recommended for data input

-.

and optional display.

.

(1) SIMMOD Version 1.2 for 386125 IBM compatible microcomputers with 80387 math coprocessors,

4 MB RAM, 80 MB hard disk, 1.2 LMB (5.25”) or 1.44 MB (3.5”) floppy disk drive, VGA graphics system (board and

monitor), Mouse (Microsoft-compatible), and a Epson/HP Lasejet or compatible printer. DOS 3. I or higher (DOS 4.0

is not recommended) or OS/2. .

(2) SIMIUOD Version 2.1 operates on SUN Spare and HP9000/700 series computers. Parts of this version

operate on IBM RS6000 machines having 32 MB RAM and 1.2 GB Hard drives.

b . Model Source. The SIMMOD model and information on the model may be obtained from:

FAA, Program Analysis ad Operations Research (ASD-400)

800 Independence Avenue SW

Washington, D.C. 20591.

Telephone number (202) 358-5225

Internet Address: http://www .orlab. faa.gov/homepage.html

5 3 DPORT MOD& This model is a general purpose airport simulation that can be used for any airport. It

r&&es a DOS platform and-can produce animated graphic output. The input data include phy&ai airfield layout, ATC

rules and procedures, and aircraft performance characteristics. The input can also be modified in a user interface mode.

Either actual or randomly-generated flight schedules can be used to drive the model. Among the unique features of the

Airport Machine are detailed landing deceleration modeling, deceleration and exit selection, spacing of arrivals to allow

runway crossing, controlled departure queuing, and user interface to allow optimization of outcomes. Information on this

model may be obtained from:

FAA Technical Center, Atm: Mr. John Vander Veer

Aviation System Analysis and Modeling Branch (ACT-520A)

Atlantic City International Airport, N. J. 08405

Telephone number (609) 485-5645

54 . AIRFIELD DELAY SIMULATION MODEL (ADSIM). ADSIM is a discrete-event simulation model that

calculates travel time, delay and flow rate. It may also be used to analyze the components of an airport, airport operations,

and operations in the adjacent airspace. The model implements the Monte Carlo sampling techniques. The procedural

logic and physical network are used to simulate traffic using a series of probabilistic parameters such as gate service time,

arrival runway separation time and may others. The output enables users to generate performance data based on hourly

Chap 5

Par 5-l 91
AC 150/5060-5 CHG 2 12f l/95

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

flow rates, delays encountered on different routes, travei time, and others.

5-5. Am-D CAPACITY MOD& This upgraded FAA Airfield Capacity Model is a computer program which

analytically calcuiates themaximum operational capacity 0f.a runway system under a wide range of conditions. The mode1

user has considerable tieedom to vary the parameters of the computation, such as number and usage of runways, aircraft

mix and speeds, and the characteristics of the ATC system.

5-6 MODEL AVWTY Tapes of the ADSIM and Airfieid Capacity model are available from the National

Te&ical Information Service (NY&), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161. The NTIS accession code

number for ADSIM (Model Simulation) is PB84-171560, for ADSIM User’s Guide is PB84-171552. The NTIS accession

code number for Upgrade FAA Airfield Capacity Model Supplemental User’s Guide is AD-Al04 154/O. Telephone

orders (703) 487-4650 ( TDD for the hearing impaired (703) 4874639 ), or FAX orders (703) 321-8547.

5-7 AIRPORT DESIGN COMPUTER MOD&. This computer model requires minimal input and provides output

wGch can be computed as specified in chapter 2. Refer to AC 150/53OO-13, Airport Design, Appendix 14, Computer

Program, for details on this computer model.

.

a. Computer Reqyrements Airport Design runs on the IBM PC family of computers and all true IBM

compatibles. It requires DOS of 3.1 or higher and at least 64OK of RAM.

b Airport Design Software Source. is available for downIoading from the Office of Airport Safety and

Standard Electronic Bulletin Board System.

Telephone number: (202)267-5205

Data bits: 8

Parity: (Wo=

Stop bits: 1

Baud rate: 300/1200/2400~9600/14400

S-8. PROPmT@kY MOD=. Consultants doing airport engineering and planning as welI as individual airport

engineering/planning departments have developed or purchased proprietary models to carry out airport capacity and delay

studies. Information on computer reqyirements and licensing costs for a proprietary nwciel must be obtained from the

respeaive Hm&l owner.
12f If95 AC 150/5060-5 CHG 2

’ Appendix1

APPENDIX 1. ELXAMPLE A-PLYING CHAPTER 2 CALCULATIONS

1. YERQ I The e,xampies in this appendix iksuate applications of chapter 2 capacity ad delay c&ddom witi

portions of the appropriate tables and figures of chapter 2 reproduced in the examples. The work sheers provided in

appendix 5 are used to record data.

2 .# DAPPLES. The following four esamples illustrate the progressive calculations of chapter 3,.

a. Exarr@eS.

(1)

(2)

(3)

I (4)

Calculate existing runway capacity (figure Al-l).

Identify airport improvemen& to accommodate demand (figure AM).

Determine annual delay (figure Al-3).

Calculate potential savings associ.ted with reduced delay (figure AM).

b . The Data.following data is given for the four examples.

(I) The airport has a single runway wirh a full length parallel taxiway and entrance-exit taxiways. All

required navigational and air traffic aids exists, or will exist, and there are no foreseeable airspace limitations.

(2) The airport has a forecast demand of 3XI,ooO annual operations by the year 2000. The demand consists

of 41 percent small aircraft (one half of these are single engine), 55 percent large aircraft, and 4 percent heavy aircraft.

Air carrier operations predominate and touch-and-go operations are nominal.
AC 150/5060-5 CHG 2

Appendix f

1

large, i%

2 0

Aircraft Mix. Enter the mix Of the fotecasted deraand (41% mall, 53%

heavy) in cam 1 tiwaxgh 4 of the work sheet.

Rmway-use. Sehct the runway-u* Ercm figure 2-l that best

repmsents the air;?ort. Enter the diag’bm .mtixr (I) in column 6 and a lim sketch

of the configuration in c~fvmn 7,

33 220,300

51 so 240.300

3 0 Mix Index, Calculate the , mix index, 55+3(4)- = 67, and entez in cok,zmxz 5,

4. aa;lrly Cmacity. Enter the hazzly VFR and m canacities and the Asv,

obtained from diagram 1, figure 201~ in cdxntnrunng 8, 9, and lo.

5 conclusfon. me AS? of 205,000 ~prations is less L%an tie forecasted

demand if 220,000 annual o-rations. Unless additionaL capacity is gmvided., delays

WiJJ Mane costly.
9/23/w AC 150/5060-S

4PP-d~ 1

ExA#QLB 2. Ibrantple 1 cowluded that the Asv of 205,000 opmations is less than the

forecasted 220,000 operational demand. Identify alternative. two-runway configuratiorm that will accoaplnodate the demand,

1 Capacity of Alternatives. &peat each of the calculations of example 1

for eaci; of the two-runway configurations.

- - a - - bm@rn '"z8 s

t. -

.a m so m am,w l Y ab w 88 a3b.w

2 . Canclusion. The parallel runway-use configuration (a), which meets the

separation requiremnts for siPrUltaneaus instrument approaches, provides the best

VFR and IFR hourly capacities and ASK Any of the parallel runway-use configurations as -11 au the diverging runway-use configuration met the forecasted*demnd.

SMB croming and conmrging runway-use configurations have less capacity than the

fmecasted demand.

Figure JU-2. Identify two-runway configurations
AC 150/5060;5 g/23/83

Appendi%l

mcABQLB 3. What annual delay is anticipated fa the existing and emb-of the alternative runway-use con&urations?

SOLUTION% The follmving calculations axe for the eacistizg single rummy-use configuration are repeated for each of me alternative zwway-uae configurations.

1. AnnualDemand Enter 220,000 (uperatio@a in column 11.

2. &mand-ASV Ratios. Divide the annual

coll&unn 120

220/205 - 1.07

3. Average Aircraft Delay. Obtain the

high and law average &lays pet aircraft from

figure 2-2 and enter. in columns 13 and 14.

4 . Annual Delay. Cal&date annual

delay and entet results in columns 15. and 16.

3.5 x 220,000 - 770,000 minutes

5.8 x 220,000 - 1,276,OOO minutes

by the ASVandentez in

5 0 collusions. Amrage &lay perr aircraft ad annualtilrrp with prtallhl

tunaray-use configuration8 are dgnificantly le88 tb8n with say of tba tit mummyu= =mfigumtian8,
12/l/95 AC 150/5060-S CHG 2

~Appendix 1

. 1

I

EXAMPLE J- MU savings CXI be realized from the reduced delay axxicipami k e,mple 3 when going from runway-e

coxlfi~tion 1 to 3.

I

1 SOLUTION:

I

I

1

1. Ailocxe &ace. Distribute aircrafi classes used for the capacity calculations (21% A, 20% 8, 55% C, a,&

I

4,s D) among the airpon’s diiferent types of aircraft and users.

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

1

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

For this exarqls the 21% A is distributed as follows:

6% smaI,I aircraft 'havizq 1-3 seats (GA),

12% small aircraft haviq 4+ seats (GA) I and

3% smaII aircraft haviq 4+ seats (AT)

Comparable distributions are made for the other aircraft classifications.

2 Wculate Aversee Cost Per Minute. Using tie defay costs provided in figure u-12, cddae he avenge deiev

cost a&&ted to each type of aircraft.

.

NOTE: Other delay costs mav be used.

the rationale for the costs u&d.

When other de!ay costs are used, identify the source of their delay costs or e,splain

Class A l-3 seats 0.06 x 0.50 = 0.036

4+ seats (GA) 0.12 x 1.00 = 0.120

4i seats. (AT) 0.03 x ID.80 = 0.054

NOTE: Similar calculations are made for the other aircraft classes and users.

3s. .

the potendal savings.

avi 0 . Subtract projected minures of future delay from current estimates of delay to establish

Use both the low and high range from figure AL3.

Current Delay (000 Minutes) 770 LOW 1,276 Efigh

Projected Delay (000 Minutes) 209 ‘J 319 ”

Potmtial Savings (000 Minutes) 561 ” 957 ”

4. InSava. this e,xam$le, the projected benefit of reduced delay is calcuhted co range fkom a low of S7,610,000

to a high of S12,982,000.

NOTE: Savingi in this e,sampIe do not include purchase or replacement costs of the airplane, airport fees, and other

incidental costs incurred by an airline or by an airplane owm. Nor does the example attempt to include the benefits to

passengers of reductions in flight defavs. .

Figure Al4 Savings associated with reduced delay

5
AC 150/5060-5 CHG 2

Amendix 1

121 l/96

Aircraft Percent of

Aircraft

Dolfars

Minute

Average

cost

Class A

12.5OOPounds or less

Single Engine

1-3 Seats 6 0.60 0.036

4 + Seats (GA) 12 1.00 0.120

1 I

1 4 + Seats (AT) I 3 I 1.80 1 0.054

CIass B

12.5OOPounds or less

Multi Etigine

Piston Twin (GA)

Piston Twin (AT)

Turbine Twin (GA)

8 2.50 0.200

4 3.70 0.148

5.20

Turbine Twin (AT) 8 6.80 0.544

CIass C Piston Engine (GA) 2.80 -

12SOOt0 3OO,OOOPounds .

Piston Engine (AT) 2 4.00 0.080

Piscon

~-

 Engine (AC) 2.90

Turbine Twin (GA) 2 5.60 0.112

Turbine Twin (A?? 5 7.30 0.365

Turbze Twin (AC) 6 6.60 0.396

Turbine Four (AC) 1s. 10

2 Engine Jet (AT)

I I I CIass D

Over 3OO,OOOPounds

-4 2 Engine Jet (AC) 4 39.00 1.560

3 Engine Jet (AC) - 57.60

Helicopters

~~~ T

4 Engine Jet (AC) 79.30

Piston (GA) 1.40

Pismn (AT) 2.30

Turbine (GA) L

Turbine (AT)

~~

- 3.30

- 4.40 -

Totals I 100 I

r 13.565

(GA) General Aviation (AT) Air Taxi (AC) Air Carrier

LOW High

Current Deiay (OOO Minutes) I 770 1 I ,276

I ‘I

Projected Deiay (OOO Minutes) I x9 II

Potential Savings (OOO Minutes)

Average cost Per Mimm

I 361 957

I II

I 13.565 1 13.563 11

Projected Benefit Per Year (OOO D&lars) I

7,610 1 12.982

Figure Al-4 Savings associated with reduced delay (cont.)

6
g/23/83 AC 150/5069-5

Appendix2

. APPENDIX 2. IMAMPW APPLYING cHAP!mR 3 CAL~TIONS

1 . GENERAL. The examples in this appendix illustrate applications of chapter 3

capacity and delay calculations with portions of the approptiate tables and figures

of chapter 3 reproduced in the examples. The work sheets provided in appendix 5 are

used to record data.

2 0 ElKAMP=. Ten examples, figures M-1 through A2-lOI illustrate the progressive

calculations of chapter 3.

a. mamples.

(1) Harrly capacity of the runway ca8ponent (figure M-1).

(2) Hourly capacity of the taxiway canponent (figure A2-2).

(3) Hourly capacity of gate group cmpments (figure u-3),

(4) Airport hourly capacity (figure A2-4).

(5) Annual service voluzae (figure A2-5),

(6) Hourly delay to aircraft on the runway component (figure A206).

(7) Daily de&y to aircraft an the runway component when the D/C ratio is

1.0 or less fog each hour (figure A2-7),

(8) Daily delay to aircraft an the runway component when the D/C ratio is

greater than 1.0 for one or 1Iyllte hours (figure M-8).

(9) Annual delay to aircraft on the rummy canponent (figure A2-9),

(10) Hamly demand corresponding to a specified Level of average haarly

delay (figure A2-10).

b 0 Data.

statenmnE7

bata mcessary to solve each example is prmided in the fntroductory

Tb the extent practical, results fraa cme example axe used in subsequent

examples.

1
AC 150/5060-5 g/23/83

Appendix2

EICAIQLE 1. Determine VFR and IFR hourly capacities of the depicted a$rport. In the

typical busy hour8 it has 13 single-engine, 10 light twin-engine 8 25 'transport type8

and two widebody operations. During VFR conditions 8 arrivals constitute 85 percent

of the operations and there are three touch and go%. During IFR conditions, the

busy ham count of small aircraft -rations drops to two single-engine and five

light twin-engine aircraft and arrivals constitute 55 percent of the ape-rations.

There are no touch and go's during IFR conditions. The airport typically operates

with arrivals on one runway and departures on the other.

SOLUTION: The work sheet on page 5 illustrates one method of recording data.

1 Weather. Enter the weather condition(s) applicable to the capacity.detetmination in column 1.

2 Runway-use.

diagrai is No. 43,

From figure 3-2 (illustrated) 8 the runway-use configuration

Enter this diagram number in column 3 I and a line sketch of the

configuration in column 2.

3 Capacity Figure (8) The appropriate figures for determining capacity are

No. 3-27 for VFR conditions'and No. 3-59 for IFR conditions. These VFR and IFR

references are entered on the line in column 4 corresponding to the weather '

condition.

Figure A2-1. Hamly capacity of the runway caqpnent
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

Appendix 2

4 Mix Index.

state&t.

This input is calculated using data prmided in the example

Table 1-1 (illustrated) is used to make the conversion.

Table l-l. Ahcraft clauiflcatioru

ham Cest. T.O.

might (UN)

C 12,500 - 300,000 halti L=9@ (t)

L

D wet 300,000 nati fliaqr (a)

The computation of aircraft mix is carried out by setting up a table in the following format. The percent of operations by each aircraft class is recorded in columns .

5 through 8.

Aircraft

1

VFRMiJc IFR Mix

L I

I I

Description Class No. ops. 8 ops. No. ops. Bops. '

. L, 1 , I

Single-engined A 13 26 2 6

1 1

Light-twins B 10 20 5 15

w, f

Transport-type C 25 50 25 73

- 1

Widebodied D 2 4 2 6

I

Totals (No. Ops. bi % @so) 50 I 100 I 34 100 J

The mix indices are calculated and entered in column 9.

m - 50+3(4) - 62

IFR - 73+3(6) - 91

5 Percent Arrivals.

and 55'for IFR conditions.

The percent arrivals is given as 45 for VFR conditions

Enter in column 10.

6 Hourly Capacity Base (C*).

for IFR; and enter in column 14.

Obtain C* from figure 3-27 for VFR and 3-59

7 Touch and Go Factor (T).

VFR and'none in IFR.

The statement specified 3 touch and gos during

Since a touch and go is a landing and a takeoff (2 operations),

the percent of touch and go operations in VFR conditions is6/50 or 12 percent.

Obtain the touch and go factor T from figure 3-27 for VFR and 3-59 for IFR and enter

in column 150

Figure A2-1. Hourly capacity of the runway canponent (cont.)

3
AC 150/5060-S

Appendix2

g/23/83

HO-URLY CAPACITY BASEC.

I EXIT FACTOR IE

HOURLY~CAPACITY BASE W

I

TOUCB t60 FACTOR t

f-l.00

8 mit Factor EL A landing aircraft might exit at the runway intersection

(1600 beet) or at one of the three right-angled exits located 3000, 4500, and 6000

feet frora the threshold. Fram figures 3-27 for VFR and 3-59 for IFR, determine the

exit range and the exit factor E. In this example, only two exits are within the

range between 3500 to 7000 feet. Enter the exit locations in columns 12 and the

number of usable exits in column 13. The exit fact-8 E are entered in column 16.

Figure A2-1. Baarly capacity of the runway cvnt (cont.)
g/23/03 M 150/5060-S

mppendiac 2

9 Calculate Capacity.Oampute the hourly capacity of the rutway-use configurtion aid enter in column 17.

VFR Capacity - 89~1.06°0.94 * 88.68 01: 89 opatatians per: ham

IFR capacity - 53~1.00'0097 - 51.41 or 51 uperationrr per: hour

mzk &met fort mmuay hmrly capacity.

10 elusion. !Che calcuhted harrly cap&cities of t& zunway*sa configuration0; 89 qeratiom per harr in VFR canditiam and 51 apsrations pet baar in IFR

conditions exceeds the aemnautical demnd8 of 50 VFR opezatium and 34 IFR aperation8 specified in tb8 statemeMo

Figure A2-1. Emarcly capacity of &e runway campomnt (cont.)
AC 150/5060-5

Appendix 2

9/23/83

EXAMPLE 2, Determine the VFR and I*R capacity of taxiway crossings (A and B) for

the airport of example 1 when uperated as shawn. Use the traffic data fram example

1 NOTE: Runway usage is reversed from that used in example 1 to permit illustation of the crossing effect on both arrivals and departures.

SOLUTION: The work sheet on page 7 illustrates one method of recording data.

1. Weather. Enter type of weather in column 1.

2. Crossinq Location. Identify and enter crossing locations in columns 2

and 3. Taxiway crossing (A) is 2300 feet from the arrival threshold acd taxiway

crossing (B) is 3000 feet fram the departure threshold.

3. Runway Operations Rate, Determine operations rate and enter in column 4.

The airport has a VFR demand of 50 aperations per hour with 45 percent arrivals,

. Leer 23 arrivals and 27 departures. The touch-and-o adjustment reduces the departqre demand to 24 operations, In IFR there are 19 arrivals and 15 departures.

4. Mix Index. Calculate the mix index and enter in column 5. 'VFR mix index

i$ 62 and IFR mix index is 91.

5. Taxiway Crossing Capacities, Obtain crossing capacities from figure 3-66A

(illustrated) for the arrival crossing (A) and figure 3-67A (illustrated) for the

departure crossing (B) and enter in columns 6 and 7.

Crossing A (arrivals) VETt capacity = 107, and IFR capacity = 92

Crossing B (departures) VFR *capacity = 125, and IFR capacity = 112

Figure A272, Haurly capacity of the taxiway component

- 6
g/23/83

FImE 3-a luJwuAY ofERATIcH6 RATE FI~RE WA RWAY OPERATIOWS RATE

0 TO 35 OPERATIolys PER tWR 0 TO 35 OPERATIocls PER HOUR

DISTMCE oc: VAXIWAY FROM

#

DEPARTWE EHD.OF RURUAY

Figure 3-66 (arrivals). -

AC 150/5060-5

Appendix 2

n

4 0 60 80 im 120 140 160 180

ClIX INDEX -- PERcEmc+3D)

Figure 3-67 (departures).

Distance RUI

Weather Taxiway from ops

Cross% Threshold Rad 1

4

A 2300’ 24

I

rt

I

B

I

3000’ 20

I

I

A 1 2300’ 1 15

II B 3000’ 19

4

Taxiway . Crossing Capacities

lay (Operations per Hour) 7

Mix Arrivals and Departures

fndex Mixed Operations Plus T 6 C

5 6 I 7 1 1

52 107 -

Yl

62 - 125

91 92 -

/

91 - 112 1

Work sheet for taxiway crossing capacities.

6. Conclusion. The taxiway crossing capacities for the stipulated operational

conditions would not be capacity limiting since the demand is less than one-fcxrrth

of the theoretical capacity.

Figure A2-2. Hourly capacity of the txxway component (cont.)

7
AC 150/5060-5

Appendix 2

g/23/83

EXAMPLE 3. Determine the hourly capacity of the terminal gate camplex at the airport of example 1. It has 10 gates allocated to three airlines X, Y, and 2. Only . .

the end gates X-3 and Y-3 are capable of accomnodating widebodied aircraft. During

an hours airline X schedules 13 non-widebodies with an average gate time of 45 minutes and two widebodies with an average gate time of 55 minutes. Airline Y schedules

eight non-widebodies with an average gate time of 40 minutes and airline 2 schedules

four non-widebodies with an average gate time of 35 minutes.

*30m!r1cm: The work sheet on page 9 illustrates one method of recording data.

1 . Gates Groups. The gate groups (airlims identification) and type of gates

me entered in columns 1, 4, 5, and 13.

2 Gate Mix. Operational demands are entered in columns 2 and 3. The gate

mix obiained by dividing the number of non-widebodied operations by the total number

of .operations is entered in column 6.

3 . Gate Percentage. Calculate the percentage ‘of widebodied gates in each gate

group and enter in column 7.

4 Gate Occupancy Time, Gate times are entered in columns 8 and 9. Since

gate &es vary by airline and location I it is presumed that the example,average

gate occupancy times mre obtained by on-site surveys.

5 Gate Occupancy Ratio. Gate occupancy ratio (R) 8 entered in column 10, is

deter&ed by dividing the average gate occupancy time of the widebodied aircraft by

that of the non-widebodied aircraft.

Airline X, R = 55/45 = 1.22

When no widebodied aircraft are accamodatedr R mals 1.00

Figure I&2-3* Eburly capacity of gate group canponent
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-5

Appendix 2

6 Gate Capacity. Calculate the hourly capacity for each gate group from the

equation G*S”N where N equals the number of gates in the group. Obtain values for

G* and S from figure 3-68 (illustrated) and entered in columns 11 and 12. Do not

interpolate 8 use the chart with the lower R value. ,

PERCENT NOR-WIDEBODY

Rd.0 \

40 45 50 55 60

tU#WIDEBODY AIRCM GATE OCCUf’~~

iii

a

P 3.

YtnftN I nu

AIRCI

ifs 1. I I I IR4.2J

/dtc 40 45 50 55 60

.mIN-WIDEDODY AJRCWGATE OCCUPANCY .

(PERCUT MOM-WIDEBODY AIRCWT)

\ . .

# G*x S x N = Hourly Capacitfl

Gate Avetage Gate Gate Eoutly Gate No. Hourly

Demand No. Gates GateMix Time (Min.)

Group ' '%zY -*=, size Gates capacity

(W WI w WI 00 WI WI W) ( WTn) Ba8e

0) 1 w . (Tn) elld (R) (W) (N) (WeSeN)

12 3,415,617 8 9 1 10 11 is)

I 9 15 'IA I A4 Aa 4 AI 1 I 1 I I I I 1

X 13 2 4 1 87 20 45 55 1.22 2.6 097 5 13

L .

Y 8 0 2 1 100 33 40 0 1.00 3.0 1.00 3 9

z 4 0 2 0 100 0 35 0 1.00 340 1.00 2 7

1

Capacity of the Terminal

Work sheet for gate capacity.

7 Conclusion. The gate group capacity of airline X is two operations short

of its'demand, whereas the calculated gate group capacities of airlines Y and 2

exceed their demand 5y one and three aperations respectively. The terminal capacity

exceeds the combined airline demand by two operations per hour.

Figure A2-3. Hourly capacity of gate group components (cont.)
AC 150/5060-5

Appendix 2

9/23/83

EXAMPLE 4. Identify the constraining component under VFR conditions of the example

airport. Use previously calculated data.

S0LuT10BT: The work sheet below illustrates one method of recording data.

1 Capacity and Demand. The airport components, hourly capacities and demands

obtainid fram examples 1, 2, and 3 are entered in columns 2 and 3 of the work sheet.

2 Demand Ratio. Divide

in column 4.

3 Camponent Quotients.

ratio ind enter in column 5.

each component demand by the runway demand and enter

Divide each components hourly capacity by its demand

4 Constraining Component.

(i.e. 64).

Identify the lowest component quotient in column 5

I

Dewmd Ratio' 1 Ccmponent Quotient

Hourly Componet Demand Component Capacity

, Component - - and 1 Runway Demand 1 Demand Ratio

I I 2 3 I 4 5 I

Runway 89 50 50150 = 1.00 8g/"AO = 89

I

Twy XiW A

I

j07 1 20 1 20/50 = .bO ~,07/.40 =.257

\

n@Jy xing B 125 24 _ 24/50 = .48 I%/.-48 z 260

Gates 29 27 27&O = 054 2g/.54 = 54

W&k sheet for identifying the constraining component.

5 Corw=lusion. The constraining component is the terminal gate cauplex which

limits'the airports hourly capacity to 54 operations per haul:.

?igurt A24 0 Airport hourly capacity
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

Appendix 2

EXAMPLE5, Determine the ASV of the example airport assuming there are 219,750

annual operations, 690 average day operations and 50 peak hour operations.

SOLUTION: The work sheet on page 12 illustrates one laethod of recording data.

1. Calculate Cw.

a. Runway-use Configuration. Identify the different runway-use conditions

used over the course of a year and the mix index for each use. Enter in columns

1 through 4.

b Percent of Use (P).

is used a;d enter in column 5.

Identify jzhe percent of the time each configuration

The figures shown on the work sheet in column 5 are

hypothetical.

c. Runway Hourly Capacity (C). Calculate the hourly capacities of operating conditions as in example 1 and enter in column 6. Example 1 dataare used for

operating conditions 1 and 2.

d Maximum Capacity Configuration.

that provides the maximum capacity.

Identify the runway-use configuration

e. Percent of Maximum Capacity. Divide the hourly capacity of each runwayuse configuration by the capacity of the configuration that provides the maximum

capacity and enter in column 7.

Operating condition 1 89/89 = 100

I a 2 51/89 = 57

a a 3 62/89 - 70

a8 a 4 52/89 - 58

a a 5 59/89 - 66

a a 6 46/89 = 52

f ASV Weighting Factor (W) Pram Table 3-1, identify the weighting factor

(w) for &ch operating condition and'enter in column 8.

Table 3-1. MVIUghtingIhc-r

I Fmrcwat of I lbighting ?actaa

E

mxr

I

-P=m Ias In&r Mix Ix&x mx rndrr

(O-20) (2140) (51480)

1

91+ 1 1 1 1

1

U-90 5 1 3 5

I

6660 15 2 8 ls

SldS 20 3 12 20

1 L

o-so 2s 4 16 25

* .

Figure A2-5. Annual service volume

. . 11
AC 150/5060-5

Appedix2

g/23/83

1 l’lu uxxeur -F=

aarm Index (PI (C)

dA 4 4 6 u 1

\b- . 62 91 74 5 8951 loo 57 201 1

5 VFR 62 4 5 9 6 6 15 I

6 rm 91 4 46 5 2 2 0

7 IFR Below - 3 2 5 l

Work sheet for ASV factors.

g. Weighted Hourly Capacity (C& Calculate the weighted hourly capacity

using the follcwing equation:

cw

m

(PlClQ) + (QC2W2) + l o l (PnGWn)

(PlQl + (QW2) + ..* (P&J

cw m (.74.89.1) + ( .05*51*20) + (.05*62*15) + (.05~52~20) + (,o@!jg.l5) +

L74°1) + (.05°20) + (.05*15) + (.05*20) + (,04015) +

(.04046*20) + (.03eO"25)

(.04*29) + (.03025)

cw

287.56 ' m

5.64 oc 51 operations per hour,

2 l Daily Demand Ratio (D) l Calculate D using the equation:

D- 2hnual m 21g,750 s 318

Average Day-peak month 690

3 l Eaarly Demand Ratio (H). Calculate H from the equation:

ET- Average Day-qeak month m 6go II: 14

Avetage Peak -x&peak month 50

4 0 Calculate ASVe ASV is calculated from the equatiosr ASV%*DeH

ASV - 51*318*14 * 227,052 operations per yeat.

5 . Canclusion. ASV is an indicator of the annual operational capability of an ,

airport adjusted for differences in hourly capacities whiCh occur aver the camse of

a mate fn this example, the airport theoretically could. have accmted and

. add~tfonal 7,302 operation8 dud!@ the ware

?igure U-5* Anmal 8ervice vof (cont.)
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-5

Appendix 2

EXAMPLE 6. Determine the hourly delay in VFR and IFR weather conditions for the

example airport in its predominate mode of operation. The peak 15 minute demand in

VFR is 20 operations and in IFR it is 15 operations. Extract necessary data from

examples 1 through 5.

SOLUTION: The work sheet on page 16 illustrates one method of recording data.

1 Hourly Capacity. Enter the hourly'capacities calculated in example 1

(89 VF& 51 IFR) in column 5.

2 Identify Delay Figure

runwaykse configuration as NOe

NOS. From figure 3-2 (illustrated), identify the

43 and figures 3-85 and 3-91 for determining VFR and

IFR delay, Enter in CO~U~S 2, 3@ and 4,

Ruuurr-USA D~ncrur

Dtrc. T

wo,

43

II

4s

46

u

40

19

s o

51

s 2

s3

sr

CCI

Ruttur~ lrtrrtrcttoa

Dtttrttct IN FEET

- -

1x1

oto1999

2wo to 4999

sow to moo

OTO 1999

2ow to 4999

m TO #)(10

OTOl20@ TO -

sooo TO #100

@TOi=

= TO m

m TO 8ooo

OTr,Iaoa

Ftaa

For CAPACITY

VFR IFR

$27 ss9

w0 Ho

H9 S61

3-H). 562

531 x3

H2, 3-64

S27 349

3-20 f-60

349 S61

530 H2

3-31 MS

s 3 343

VW l cm

1 For

VFR

34s

H6

346

H6

Hl

3-71

3

c0lumn~6~

DeMndSe Enter the hourly demand from example 1 (50 VFR, 34 IFR) in

and the 15 minute demmds of 20 VFR and 15 IFR in column 7,

4 l Demand/capacity RatiOe Calculate the D/C ratios and enter in column 8.

D/C ratio VFR = SO/89 * 0.56

D/C ratio IFR - 34/51 = Oe67

5 IDelay IndiCeS.

delay index

From figure 3-85 an& 3-91 (illustrated), obtain arrival

(NI) and @e&rture delay index (DDI) and enter in columns 11 and 13.

Enter &le 1 mix indices in column 10 (62 VFR, 91 IFR) and percent atrivals in

COlUmn 9 (459 VFR, 559 IFR)e

Figure M-6. Burly delay

13
ACX50/5060-5

hppendix 2

g/23/83

ARRIVAL DtLAY BNOEX

4aR ARRfVMs sx ARRIVnls

r: 1.0

3

0.8

2 1.0

8

p

0.8

& 0.6

1

0.4

p

0.8 % 0.8

1

* 0.6

a

d 0.4

w

g 0.2

= 1.0

Q

B

0.8

5 0.6

a

%

0.4

0.2

f: 1.0

8

jI.8

* 0.6

ia

c

0.4

tl

0.2

Ftcun~ 3-85. Darrr ~~mrcrs FOI ~AY-M DlAoull IDS.: 43,49,55,61 foa HR cowtfom

VFR ADIat40%*0.90 VFR DDI at 40% - 0.90

w w 50% = 1.00 I) a 50% = 0.67

(I 45% - 0.95 I a 45% - 0.78

= 1.0

8

ii 04

a: 0.6

1 0.4

0 0.2

= 1.0

Q

0.8

* 0.6

a

0.4

0.2

I

Flcurtr 3-91, Ikur IIDICES FOI IOYAY-USE DlAclMll mses 2,3,2,9,32-35,3t-13,19,5S,61~,72-7c,76,

77,79,~,~-85,Bt-~,91,~,~,%,~-1~,~~ fm IFR comnoas.

IFR AD1 at 50% - 1.00

a 0 60% - 1.00

a a 55% = 1.00

Uilt AD1 at 50% * 0.57

I) a 60% - 0.38

a a 55% - 0.47

Figure A2-6. Ealtly aelav (cont.)
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

Appendix 2

6 Delay Factors. Calculate the arrival and departure delay factors (ADF and

DDF) ding the equation ADF = ADI. (D/C) and DDF = DDP(D/C). Enter results in

columns 12 and 14,

ADF for VFR =.0.95eO.56 = 0.53 DDF for VFR = 0.78*0.56 . = 0.44

ADF for ,IFR = l.00*Oo67 = 0067 DDF for IFR = 0:47~0.67 = 0.31

7 Demand Profile Factor (DPF). Divide the 15 minute demand (column 7) by the

hourly'demand (column 5) and mltiply the result by 100. Enter results in column 15.

DPF for VFR - (20/50)*100 = 40%

DPF for IFR = (15/34)*100 = 44%

8 Determine Averaqe Delay. Using figure 3-69 (illustrated), the delay factors (columns 12 and 14), and the demand profile factors (column 15), determine the

average delay to an arriving and a departing aircraft for VFR and IFR conditions and

enter in column 16 and 17.

2

0

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0,s 1.0

ELAY FACTOR

Fiuure A24 umrly &lay (cont.)
AC 150/5060-S

Appendix2

g/23/83

9 Hmrly Delay.

enter in column 18.

Calculate the hourly delay using the following equation and "

Hourly delay - Hourlydemand C(% arrivalwaverage arrival delay)

+ (% departurewaverage departure delay)]

Delay in VEB = 50 f(0.45~1.3)+(0.55~0.95)]= 55 minutes

Delay in IFR = 34 [(0.55~2.8)+(0.45*0.06)]- 53 minutes

rig. lb.

A 43 85 89 50 20 p.56 45 62 .g5 .53 J8 .U 40 1.3 .95 55 7

43 91 51 34 15 067 55 91 1.00 067 .47 .31 44 2.9 .60 53

I

1

I

Work sheet for hourly delay.

10. Coxzlusi&. Because the demand is significantly less than capacity, and the

scheduled airlim QPerations are reasonably constant in VE@R or IFR weather conditions,

there is little differerwe in the minutes of delay experienced An the typical VFR or

IFRhaarr,

Figure A2-6. Harrly delay (cont.)
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

Appendix 2

EXAWLE 7. Pbtermim the daily delay in VFR conditions for the example airport.

The haurly &mand for a typical VFR day is as plotted. IMnand is alway less than

capacity. For demands of 11 to 44 operations per hour 8 arrivals equal departurer.

For demands aver 44 -rations per hax, the arrival rate drops to 45 percent. HO*

abatement practices limit the airport to the use of one runway froaa 1O:OO pm to 7800

am.

%

Y

)o

z

24

Eli

18

16

14

12

1Q

8

6

4

2

0

0 2

-

-

-

-

-

6 8 10 12 14 16 - 18 20

TDB (24EaurClook)

Histograph of daily demand

S0LuT1oN: The work sheet on page 18 illustrates one method of recording data.

.l. Calculate Capacities. Calculated runway capacities for the different

operating conditions are illustrated belaw. Assumptions mre made for demand,

aircraft mix, and percent of touch and go's for the first four operating comlitiau.

Data fraa example 1 are used for the fifth aperating condition.

405550 5 ” 20 ““”

50 8 ! " ! g4 !1.031 .g2 1 @

62 1 45 t 12 lyl45l6d I 2 I 88 Il.06 I 34 I I

Figute M-7. Daily delay, D/C ratio equal or less than LOO
AC 150/5060-S g/23/83

Append 2

2. Calculate Haxrly Delay. The hourly runway delay calculations of example 6

are repeated 24 times to develop average arrival and departure delays per aircraft

and the minutes of delay for each hour. Assume the demand is fairly uniform so that

the DPF (column 11) is 25 when the demand is less than 10 operations per hour. When

the demand is 10 or more8 the DPF is 40. Forty percent of the operations occur in a

15 minute period whenever the demand is 10 or more.

c

.

.

r

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

r

I

r

I

I

I

I

I

r

r

m

ARlrr. ml8y Hourly

mhY

Art. 011. mu 8

111 l3 14

r

0 0 0

/ &Utl3? .D/c

East Bd8c. wauad amcitY nrtio

1 2 3 4 s

.

24:00-91:00 1 92 .Ol

03roo-o4:oo

0410043:00

I

0

1 I

2

30 .,

45 .,

62 ,,

L

w

I

11

,

w

A

30 ,,

62 4

w

62

45 ,

5 ,,

w

5!

2 1 I

O !,

.64 0S100-08100

0180047:08

07809a9:oo

08:00-09:00

098~1o:oo 48

-G-

.26

A

.16

108~lb08

11809-12899

128~l3899

w

0 .26 w .16 f?

13899-14899

148~Us99

lS809-16199

19809-17899

1710~18:99

18899-19899

19,99-20899

20:99=2lt99

21:00-22899

22800-23109

- -

23~~24299

w w -21

1.00 023

095 0 39

w 422

31

.44

w 095 .43

l.oc 22

.18

.28 w

n .ll

W .06

l.oc .lO .06

.64 .04 .04 -25

.64 003 .02 ~ 25

Work sheet for daily runway delay.

3 0 Total Delay. Sum the hourly delays, i.e. 295 minutes.

4 Comlusion. The 295 minutes of &lay for the day is influenced by acheduling'practices within the ham

Figure A2-3. Daily delay, D/C ratio equal or less than 1.00 (cont.)

18
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

Appendi% 2

-LE 8. Determine the daily delay in VFR conditions if the example airport

closes the north-sarth rumvay and the demand during the 3:00 PMto 6:00 PMtim

period is increased to exceed the runways capacity.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

B

2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

d 8 1 0 12 14 16 20 22

v (24~ClocL)

24

Ustograph of daily demand,

SOLUTIONS !Cb work sheet cm page 21 illustrate one method of recording data.

1 0 Identify Saturated Tim Periodq:

a. Calculate Capacities. Calculated runway capacities for the single runway condition are illustrated belaw. Sime operations are limited to a single

runway, capacity values will differ fran those of .exam@e 7. Enter data from belaw

and fran example 7 in colunum 3, 4, 6, and 11.

ilErirD

a

a2

20

7

1 0

1

0

12 1

1 0

Work sheet fpr capacity.

Figure A2-8. Dnily delay when D/C ratio is greater than 1.00
AC 150/5060-S g/23/83

Appendix 2

b

histograph:

Identify Saturated Period. Cumpare calculated capacities to the demand

The time period from initial overload through recovery (15:OO toZMM) .

is the saturated period,

I Time Period Demand Capacity

14:00-15:oo 32

15:00-16:00 61

16:00-17:00 65

17:00-18:00 60

18:00-19:00 38

19:00-20:oo 17

20:00-21:oo 10

Overload

(Ikcovery)

69 0

55 6

55 10

55 5

55 (17)

55 (4)

92 0

Cuxnulative

Overload

0

6

16iL1

4

0

0

2 Saturated Period Delay.

as f0l;aws:

Calculate the delay for the saturated period

a. Duration of Overload Phase. Identified as 15:00 to 18:00 hours.

b 0 AD/c Ratio. Calculate the AD/C ratio for the overload period and enter

in column 5.

AD/c =

61+65+60 - 186 - 1 13

m

55+55+55 165 .

.

c. Percent Arrivals. Given as 45%.

d Delay Indices.

solumns 7 ind 9.

Obtain AD1 and DDI from figure 3-71 and enter in

AD1 at 40% = 0.74 IDI at 40% = 1.00

a 50% = 0.83 a 50% = 1.00

88 45% - 0.78 a 45% = 1.00

e. Arrival and Departure Delay Factors. Caaculate ADF and DDF for the

saturated period by multiplying AD1 and DDI by the AD/C ratio and enter in columns 8

and 10.

ADF = 0.78*1.13 = 0.88

DDF = 1.00*1.13 - 1.13

f Average Delays. Determine average delay from figure 3-70 for a 3-hour

overload phase and entered in columns 12 and 13,

Figure A2-8. Daily delay when D/C ratio is greater than 1.00 kont,)

20
9/23,‘83 AC 150/5060-5

Appendix 2

g. Saturated Pericd Delay. Calculate the saturated period (DTS) de&y and

enter in column 14.

DTs= (61+65+60+38+17)(45~4.9+(100-45).13,7)/100

= 241(974.0)/100

- 2,347 minutes of delay

3 fairly Delays Unsaturated Periods. Calculate hourly delays for the

unsatu;ated periods (24:00 to 15:00 and 20:00 to 24:00) as in example 6.

1 I "-rival mlay kprrt. lblay bhy amt. mlay saatly

I

Nhtx mctor Index -toe mctoc mirNat8r) . -lay

Bout MbC. l&mar& cap8clty1R8tfO Indsx AD1 AD? DL)I DDp DP? k?. I DhP. (Hllub8~

1 2 3 4 1s 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 13 14

. I . I I I

24:0041:00

02:00-03:00

05:00+6:00

lS:OO-16&O

16:00-17100

17:00-18:oO

18:00-19100

19:00-20100

20100-21800

21:00-22:oo

22:00-23800

23:00-24100

1 92 - - -I-I-I-

.

0

n -.

t

1 I . I 1

1 I I 1 .

0

tt I -

- - -

0

tt - - -

I

0 tt - - - - - -

3 ” .03 5 .65 .02 .so .02 40 .o.o 0.0 0 , 1

1 IO i 92 1 .II 1 5 1 .651 .07 1 .5o 1 .& 1 ” 10.1 10.0 1 1 I

I- !'

I 1-n -1 -I . . . I

I I I I I I I I I 1 t

20 69 .a 30 .70 .20 052 .15 ” 0.2 0.2 4

- -

63 .62 45 .72 .45 .64 .4o ” LO 0.8 35

, . I n 3

1 45 62 1 .73 62 1. .67 .49 .74 1.54 I w 1.1 1.4

33 69 l 4 8 30 .70 034 .56 27 n 0.6 0.4 17

25 n a 36 tt tt l 25 l 52 l 19 n Oeh Oe2 8

1 1

*, 25 n l 36 tt 1’ l 25 l 52 l ly î Oe4 Oe2 8

tt a43 î î l 30 53 l 23 1 í .I w I 60 I-461 ‘3O IaTO1,32 I :%I.26

Oe5 Oe3 12

140 IOe61Oe41 16 I

1 r

65 ” )leI3 71 l 78 l 88 I.00 1.13 40 u be9 lye7 2347

.

60 “j I

/

38 1’ I

,I7 55

10 92 l ll 5 l 65 l O7 l 50 l O6 40 Oel OeO 1

.

1 0 tt l 1 1 " " l O7 î l O6 î 0.1 OeO 1 L

6 1’ l 07 ” ” l O5 î .04 1’ OeO OeO 0

4’

4 92 l O4 51 l 65 l O 3 .50 .02 40 OeO OeO 0

L a 1

Work sheet for daily delay when.D/C ratio is greater than 1.00.

4 Daily Delay. Sum the hourly delays for the saturated and unsaturated

per&, i.e. 2,507 minutes.

5 . Conclusion. When demand exceeds capacity for several consecutive hours,

daily delays increase significantly.

Figure A298e Daily delay when D/C ratio is greater than 1.00 (cont.)

21
AC 150/5060-5 - g/23/83

Appendix2

-LE 9. Determine the annual runway delay for the example airport, assuming that

the airport has an annual demand of 153,000 operations 8 a demand profile factor of

40, no runway closures 8 and relatively uniform daily demand throughout each month.

SOLUTION: The work sheet on page 25 illustrates one method of recording data,

NOTE: Use procedures illustrated in examples 7 and 8 to determine the delays for

VFR and IFR days. To allow for seasonal variations of demand, 24 representative

days are used, i.e., a VFR and an IFR day for each calender month.

1 Distribute Demands. Distribute the annual demand of 153,000 operations to

repres&tative daily demands as follows:

ae Distribute to Months. Distribute annual demand to the 12 calendar

months and enter in CO~UIDII 3, Use historical data when available.

b Distribute to Days. Monthly demand

days of thl month and entered in column 4.

is uniformly distributed uver the

January: 11~631 Werations = 375 operations/average day

31 days

2. Develop Rlepresentative Days Demands. Adjust average day demand to representative

day demands to account for differerrces'in VFR and IFR operations, as follows:

a., Percent IFR Weather, From historical records, determine the percent of

the time that IFR (and PVC) weather conditions prevail 2n each of the months and

enter in column 6.

January: 18% IFR weather .

.82% VFR weather

b Number of Representative

to days and enter results in column 7,

DiaySe ,Convert percentages of VFR and IFR weather

January: 31 days*82% VFR weather = 25.4 VFR days

31 days*188 IFR weather * 5e6 IFR days

c. Percent IFR Demand. The IFR demand is 68% of VFR demand.

d Representative Day Demands.

enter in c&m 8.

Calculate daily demand as follows and

January: 100.375

100018(1-68/100) = #f = 398 VPR ops/day

l

398*68/100 - 271 IFR ops/day

' Figure A%% hnua1 dehy

22
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-5.

Appendix 2

. 3

deter&e

Develcp Hcurly Demand for bpresentative DaySeFran historical data,

the percentage of daily aperations cccuring in each hour of the day. The

percentage of demand for each hour is assumed to be the same for each representative

day whether it is an IFR or VFR day, A work sheet, similar to that on page 24, is

useful for keeping track of hcurly demands.

4 Wpresentative Daily Delay, Calculated delay for

illustlated beluw using the procedures of examples 7 and 8,

a VFR day in January is

Ebter calculated delays

in column 9.

24800-01800

01:oo-o2:00

02:.0-03:00

u - 0

0 -* 0

L

2 - -

.

L

810 -

p16 97 .16

31 97‘ 032

,37 139 I*42

n w 1.28

0

l 15 l 10

l 25

A0

l 20

2

1 2

45 ” l 42 .65 1 .zr *

I

30 ” .28 .63 1 .18 *

l 55

.85 23

8

03:00+4:00

0488o4s808

O7roo4hoo

08808488W

0988040880

10:00-ll:oo

11:00-l2800 2 0 w .21 ” ” l 21 î . *I3 î , l )o ml0 4 ,

.21 ” * .21 ” *I) l@ l p l l0 4

I a

12:00-l380.

l3:00-14800

14:~ls806

lS:OO-16100

16~00~17:@0

17:00-l8800

18800-19800

19800-20800

20800-21800

21800-22800

22:00-23:OO

23:00-24:OO

T

39 & l 44 45 î l 44 .65 l a lt 1 l w .45 26 1

31 l 32 30 w l 32 l 63 l 2 0 ‘1 l sfi l 25 32 ~

I 14

I

I 97 I ,I4 I 5 IleOOI l l4 I l 62 1 l m 1 40 1,101 ,I0 1 1 1

Generally, it is not necessary to calculate delay for very low levels of demand. In

this example 8 a one minute delay was assumed for demands between 5 to 10 operations

per hour.

Figure A2-9. Annual runway delay (cont.)

23
BG

mi

Clock Daily . Jan Feb Mat Apr. my Jun .Jul .

Tim r ops I= i fm WR IFR WR IFR VFR i.IFR VFR fFR-,.VFR IFR VFR ' II

Sep . Ott 1

W'M fFR WR! IFR m fm vm fFR_,

kt00 1 4 ,398 i 271 4114 282 I430 292 i 428 1291 436 296 478 323 473 322 52 54 44ol 299 1449 1305 4 440 299 426 I 290- 12-l 1 l 2 f 11 1 11 11 11 11 11 limllm 11 11' 11 11 11 1.1 11 11 11 11 a -1 - . -. -I -1 -1 aI a-1 r-m rm r1 rI r: rl rI AI ii !I ii I I r

!II

l-2 1 0 , 0 0 01 0 0 01 0 01 01 01 01 Ok ‘UI Ul UI UI Ul Ul UI UI UI vi Ul

2-3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01.0-l 01 or- 01 01 01 01 01 01 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,

UJ

01 01 01 01% 01 01 01 Ol 01 .Ol 01 01 01 01 01 -

01-

3-4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 04.

,405 1 0 1 0 0 w 0 I 0 0 0 I 0

mm I m I n 1 n.D nD -1 -1 -1

z

I I L

2:x I f I s ii

I . ; ; ;

1.

9[- 61 91 61 101 61 .9, 61 101 71 9, 61 9, 61 9, 61 9 6

7-8 4.1 16 1 -11 17 12 18 12 18 1121 18jm121 201 131 191 131 211 151 18.1 121 181 131 18k12i 17 12

t 8-g 17.9 , 31 I 21 33 I 22 34 23 34 1 23 1 34 23 38 26 37 25 41 28 35 24 35 1 24 3S 24 34, 2x

19-10 19.2 1 37 I 25 I- 313 26 40 27 39 1 27 1 40 27 44 30 44 30 48 33 40 28 411 28 40 28 39 . 27

1 19 1 29-l -20 1 32 1 22 1 32 1 22 1 35 1 24 1 291 20 1 30 I 20 1 29 I 20 29 I 19

112-13 I Se1 20 [ 14 I 21

114-15 18 1 27 I

, 30 1 44 [ 44 1 30 1 49 1 33 1 48 1 331 36 1 4Sl 301 46, 311 45 I

118-19 I 7.7 I 31 I 21 I 31

16-17 LO.2 41 28 1 42 29 44 30 13 I 39

17-18 I9e8 39 27 1 41 28 42 29 42 1 29 43 29 47 .32 1 46 1.: 32 1 51 1 35 431 29 44 30 43 29 42 28

2 , 22 33 22 33 1 22 34 23 37 25 36 1 25 i 40 27 34 i 23, 35 23 34 23 33 . 22

19-20 i3eS 14 ( 9 14 .lO 15 10 1s 1 10 15 10 1 17 11 17 1 1 1 18 12 15 10 i 16 11 13 1 10 13 10,

20-21 i2eO 81 S 8 6 9 6 91 61 9 61 101 61 91 6 10 7 9 61 9

21-22 12.0 81 5 8 6 9 6 91 6 9 61 101 61-9' .6 101 7 9 61 9

6 9 6 9' f.,

6 9 6

22-23 1 1.2 Sl3 5 3 3 4 313 S 4.6-4 6 4 614 S 41s

,23024 f l 8 D 31 2 31 2, 3, 21 31 2.. 31 2, 4, 3. 41 3: 41 3 4; 21 4. 4::::2)1

1 24T 161 -27 1 18 1 221 1st 23 1 16 1 22 i

Representative daily demand VFR - IFR calculationa.

January l-Z:00 to 13800 hOUt8e I

VFR m OeOS1*398 0 20

IFR - 0e051~271r lIh - *
g/23/83

5

plied iy

delay is

Monthly Delay. The delay for each representative VFR and IFR day is multithe number of representative days and entered in column 10. Total monthly

entered in column 11.

6 0 Annual Delay. Sum monthly delays to obtain annual delay.

AC 150/5060-5

Append 2

Demand Awe.

No. per Daily Percent bpresentative Day(s) yiEL!z~

M&h Days Month Demand Wbather occur. No. of Days Demand Dehy VFR/IFR Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 -. 7 8 9 10 11

3

Jan. 31 11,631 37s 82 25.4 398 163 4,140

IFR 18 5.6 271 116 650 4,790

.

Feb 28 10,926 390 80 22,'4 414 185 4,144

20 S.6 282 130 728 4,872

Mar. 31 12,S61 40s 85 26.4 430 199 5,254

1s 4.6 292 146 146 5,926

Apr. 30 12,096 403 87 26.1 428 193 s,o37

13 3.9 291 14s 566 5,603

Hay 31 12,736 411 90 27.9 436 201 S&608

IFR 10 3.1 296 148 4s9 6,067

.

June 30 13,508 IS0 92 27.6 478 278 7,673

IFR 8 2.4 32s 19s 468 8,141

! .

July 31 13,832 . 446 9s 29.4 473 o 270 7,938

S 1.6. 322 190 304 8,242

I

Aug. 31 15,227 491 98 30.4 521 35s 10,792

2 0.6 354 251 151 10,943

I

Sep. 30 12,456 41s 98 29.4 440 209 6,34S

2 0.6 299 rso 90 6,23S

r

Oct. 31 13,119 423 96 29.8 499 22s 6,7OS

IFR 4 1.2 30s 162 194 6,899

Now. 30 12,456 41s 90 27.0 440 209 5,643

XPR 10 3.0 299 1so 450 6,093

Dec. 31 12,432 401 85 26.3 426 192 s,oso

IFR 1s 4.7 290 143 672 5,722

1 1

Work sheet for annual delay.

7 . Conclusion. Variations in demand contribute maze to the 79,533 minutes of

delay than weather 8 as can be seen in the difference between VFR delays and IFR

delays for any month.

Figure A2-9. Annual delay (cont.)
AC 150/5060-5

Appendix 2

g/23/83

EXAMPLE 10. Determine the hourly demand that results in an average departure delay

of 0.5 minutes in VFR conditions. The demand profile factor is 40, the runway capacity is 89, the mix index is 62, and the arrival rate is 45 percent.

SOLUTION: Use a trial demand and compute the associated de&y. Repeat for a

refined demand closer to the target delay. Plotting the calculated demand--delay

values on a graph will expedite the procedure,

1 Plot Known Point. Ron example 6, the average departure delay in VpR condition: is 0.95 minutes when the demand is 50 operations per hour. Plot this paint.

2 l Calculate and Plot a Second Demand--Delay. Select a seconddemand, calculate the delay, and plot the point.

a. A demand of 25 operations per hour is selected.

b 0 The demand to capacity ratio is25/89 OX 0.28.

c. From figure 3-85 f the departure delay index is 0.75,

d 0 The departure delay factor is 0.75*0.28 or Om2L

e. From figure 3-6g8 the average delay to a departure is 0.22 minutes.

f l Plot the point and connect the two points.

2r-4

8

a

bo

d

k

aI

1.0

09l

0.8

07.

0.6

05.

0.4

03.

0.2

0.0

15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

Demand (Operations/Hour)

Demand versus delay graph.

Figure A2-10, Hourly demand at a specified level of delay

26
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-5

Appendix 2

3 Graphic Delay Demand. The 0.5 minute delay line intersects the plotted

. line a; a demand of 34 operations per hour.

4

demand:

Check Graphic Derived Demand. Calculate and plot the graphically derived

a . The demand is 34 operations per hour.

b 0 The demand to capacity ratio is34/89 or 0.38.

c. The departure delay index is 0.75.

d 0 me departure delay factor is 0.7500.38 or 0.285; say Oo2%

e. From figure 3-69, average departure delay is 0.5 minutes.

5 Corrclusion. Limiting the demand to 34 operations per hour meets the

averagi delay of 0.5 minutes per departing aircraft.

Figure A2-10. Hourly demand at a specified level of delay (cont.)

27
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

Appendix3

APPENDIX 3. EXAMPLES APPLYINGCHAPTER 4 CALCCKATIONS

1 . GENERAL. The examples in this appendix illustrate applications of chapter 4

capacity calculations with portions of the appropriate figures reproduced in the

examples.

2 0 E2mMPm. Fax examples, figures A3-1 thrargh A3-4, follow:

a. Hourly capacity in PVC condition (figure A+1).

b 0 Hourly capacity in tine abseme of radar cmrage ox ILS (figure A3-2).

c. Early capacity of parallelkmway airport with om runway restricted to

small aircraft (figure A3-3).

d Hcrurly capacity of a single rummy airport used exiclusively by mall

aimrift that lacks radar or ILS (figure A3-4).
AC 150/5060-5 g/23/83

Appendix3

HXAMPLE 1. Determine the capacity of the example airport in PVC conditions. Operations are limited to the N-S runway. Haurly demand consists of 25 Class C and two

Class D aircraft with a 55 percent arrival rate.

1 Capacity Figure. Fran figure 4-1 (illustrated), the runway-use configuration i; diagram No. 1, and the figure for determining capacity is No. 4-2.

Diago

Rummy-we Diagram 190.

mmmy SpmCing Viribility Ifmperativ@

(8) in fWt Oonditiam

&mny-u88

I + +

mmibr WR IFR

1 NA I- 2 445 - - 1

A'

b #

s

2a 700 to 2499 I- 3 A 4-16 w -

B 2b 2soo or mare I- 4

t.

2 . Mix Index. For 25 Class C aircraft and 2 by Class D aircraft, the mix

inde% is%

(25/27) + 3(2/27) - 93 + 3(7) or 114

3 0 Percent Arrivals. 55 percent.

Figure A3-1. Barrly capacity in PVC conditions
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-5

Appendix 3

4 l Harrly Capacity, Fran figure 4-2 (illustrated)@ the airport'capacity is 46

operations per ham.

FI6uRE 4-2, hRt.Y CAPACITY OF RUMMY-USE

DIMRAn m,, 1.

5. coIClusion. Under these conditions, the airport loses 10 percent of its

capacity when the weather deteriorates frola IFR to PVC conditions.

---

Figure U-1. Hourly capacity in WC conditions (cont.)

3
AC 150/5060-S g/23/83

Agpendix3

-LE 2. Determine the IFR capacity of the example airport when the glide slupe

portion of the ILS is inoperative, radar c-rage is out I and a circling approach is

used. Demand consists of 25 Class C and 2 Class D aircraft.

1 Capacity Figure. Ran figure 4-1 (illustrated), the runway-use conf iguration is diagram No. 44 & 47 and t!w figure 2x- cktsrdkhg capacity is No. 4-15.

, 1999

44&47 2000 to

I 4999

4SLl8 SO00 tcpoo t--iq

I - . 1 I

2

$8 UEBei.

Inoperative Aid. The radar and glide slupe are art and a circling approach

3 0 Mix Index. For 25 Class C and 2 Class D aircraft, the ti index is8

(25/27)+3(2/27) - 93+3(7) - 114

Figure A3-2. Barrly capacity in the abserrce of radar coverage or ILS

4
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

Appendix 3

4 . Eaurly capacity. prom figure 4-15 (illustrated) 8 the airport capacity is

26 operations per hour,

FIWE AHA. FIWIE A3-2Bn

tK#JlLY CWACITY IN RAMR ENvim . HamY CNWITY ICI ClollRAMR ENvIm

fI6utE b-15, hRLY CAPACITY W RUIIYAY-USE DIMRM RDS, 1, 43-54,

5 ConclUSiOn. Airport capacity is limited to 26 operations per hour when the

glide kpe portion of the ILS or radar are inmrative and a circling approach is

used. With radar coverage, the airport capacity is 40 operations per hour.

Figure A3-2. Eamly capacity in the absenec of radar coverage or ILS (cont.)

. 5
Ac 150/5060-5 g/23/83

Appendix3

BxAMpLE3. Determine the VFR haurly capacity of the runway configuration depicted

below When one runway is used only by Class A and B aircraft. IEaurly demand consists of 20% Class A, 15% Class B, 55% Class C, and 10% Class D aircraft with a 50

percent arrival rate.

A & B Aircraft Only

1 Capacity Figure..

tion ii diagram No.

From figure 4-l (illustrated) R the runway-use configura11 and the figure for determining capacity is No. 4-18.

S

a+ g 700 to 2499 4-3 4-17

10

1

w

2500 to 2999 I- 9 4-21

11 12

1

4300 3000 4-16

or tomore 4299 4-10 I1 ' 4-18

4

- I 1. 1

2 . Mix Index. For 55% Class C and 10% Class D aircraft, the mix inBex is:

55 + 3(10) - 85

3 l Percent Arrivals. 50 percent.

Figure A3-3. Iiaxly capaciw of parallel runway airport with one runway restricted

to small aircraft

6
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

Appendix 3

4 . Hourly Capacity. From figure 4-18 (illustratedL the airport capacity is

83 operations per hour.

WYRESTRICTED USE In VFR

1 rtPERCEtn ARRI

I I

I 1 .

1

4 m A A

0 20 #) 60 so100l2o1401601~

MX ImEx -- fmm (MD)

FIGURE 4-18, HOURLY CAPACITY OF RUNWAY-USE

DIAGRAM NOS. 10, 11, 12,

5 . Conclusion. The capacity of a single runway under these conditions is 57

operations per hour. The capacity of full-length, parallel, unrestricted runways

is 115 operations per hour. The capacity of parallel runways when one is limited to

use by small aircraft is 83 operations per hour.

Figure A3-3. Hourly capacity of parallel runway airport with one runway restricted

to small aircraft (cont.)
AC 150/5060-5 g/23/83

Appendix3

-LE 4. Determine the hourly capacity in VPR and IFR conditions of the runwaytaxiway configuration depicted below. The airport is used exclusively by small

(Class A and 8) aircraft and there is no radar coverage or ILS facility. Arrivals

generally equal departures I and touch and go's approach the 20 percent level.

s0w!r1oN:

1 -Airport Confiquration. From figure 4-26 (illustrated), identify the runwaytaaciwai configuration that best represents theairport.

2 0 Percent Tarch-and-Go, 20 percent.

3. . Hourly Capacity. Ram figure 4026~ the range of VFR a.nd IFR hourly capacity

is 59 to 72 operations, and 20 to 24 operations, respectively.

4 Corxzlusion. The a&t &yble to accamdate 59 to 72 operations per hour

in VFR'conditions and 20 to 24 operations per hour in IFR conditions.

Figure A%4. Hourly capacity of a single runway airport used exclusively by ~11

aircraft that lacks radar or ILS.

8
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

Appendix4

APPENDIX 4, GLOSSARYOFSYBOLS~

%(C+3D) - mix index - the percent of Class C aircraft plus 3 times the percent of

Class D aircraft

BIFR- percent of the time that IFR and PVC operating conditions prevail

%fFR demand = lOO*(IFR demand)/(VFR demand)

A - number of arriving aircraft in the hour

AD/C = average demanc+capacity ratio - (the sumof the hourly demands during the

overload phase)/(the sum of the hourly capacities during the overload phase)

ADF = arrival delay factor - ADI.(D/C) or ADI'. (AD/C) coverload phase]

AD1 - arrival delay index (figures 3-2 and 3-71 through 37102)

Annual capacity - 2bSV

ASV - annual service volume - CgD"H or (figure 2-1) cwPr=~W

C* - hourly capacity base (figures 3-2 through 3-65)

Ci = harrly capacity for each runway-use configuration (Cl through Cn)

Class A aircraft = single-e&Ed small aircraft (table l-l)

Class B aircraft - nulti-engined small aircraft (table 1-l)

Class C aircraft - large aircraft (table l-1)

Class D aircraft - heavy aircraft (table 1-1)

G - mighted hourly capacity =

CploCloWl + P2'C2'W2 +*..+ P~°Cn‘Wn)/(PloWl + Pz'W2 +.*m+ Pn'Wn)

D - demand ratio - (qua1 demand)/(average daily demand during the peak mouth)

(table 3-2) ctypical)

DA - number of departing aircraft in the hour

DAH - average deby per aircraft (figure 2-2) fapproxinmte]

DAHA - average delay for arriving aircraft (figure 3-69)

DAHD - average delay for departing aircraft (figure 3-69)

DASA - average delay per arrival (figure 3-70) baturated period]

DASD - average delay per departure (figure 3-70) baturated perid

D/C = demand-capacity ratio - (hourly demand)/(hourly capacity)

DDF - departure delay factor = DIlI. (D/c) Or DID (AD/C) &overload phase]

DDI - departure delay index (figures 3-2 and 3-71 through 3-102)

DPF - demand profile factor - 100°Q/DD -

1
AC 150/5060-S

Appendix 4

g/23/83

DTH = hourly delay - HD*(PA.DAHA + (lOO-PA)"DAHD)/lOO or HDeDAH ~pproximatef

DTS - delay in saturated period -

tq+HD2+. 0 0 +HD,).(PAS l DASA+( lOO7PAS) l DASD)/100

E - exit factor (figure 3-2 through 3-65) .

G* - hourly gate capacity base (figure 3-68)

H - demand ratio - (average daily demand)/(average peak hour demand during the

peak month) or (table 3-2) [typicalj

HD - hourly demand on the runway canponent

HDi -hourly demand on the runway ccmponentduring hourslthrargh n of the

saturated period

Hourly capacity of gates - G*deN (figure 3768)

Hourly capacity of runway canponent - C**T+ or (figures 4-1 through 4-26) &pecial

application& or (figure 2-l) ~ppraaimateJ

Harrly capacity of taxiway crossing an active runway (figures 3-66 and 3-67)

Ha;rrly delay on runway canponent - DTH

IEQ demand - VFR demand l %IFR demand/l00

N - number of gates

PA - percent arrivals - 100°(A+aq(T&G))/(A+DA+(T&G))

PAS = percent of arrivals in the saturated period

PTGG = Percent touch and gas - 100°(T&G)/(A+DA+(T&G))

PaA* percent of.the time each runway-use configuration is in use (Pl thrcugh Pn)

PVC

Q 111

R=

S -

T =

T&C

- poor visibility and ceiling - lower end of IFR conditions

peak 15-aninute demand on the runway compomnt

gate occupancy ratio - (average gate occupancy time of widebodied

aircraft)/(average gate occupan&y time of non-widebodied aircraft)

factor for gate size (figure 3-68)

touch and go factor (figures 3-2 through.3065)

* number of touch and go’s in the hour

1 gate = a gate

2 gate = a gate

that is capable of accamodating all aircraft

that will accommodate only non-widebodied aircraft

VFR demand = (average day demand)/(l-%IFR(l-%IFR demand/lOO)/lOO)

*i = Asv weighting -factor for each runway-use configuration (WI through Wn)

(table 3-1)
12/l/95

APPENDIX 5. BLANK FORMS

AC 150/5060-5 CHG 2

Appendix 5

Figure AS-L Hourly capacity, ASV, delay for long range planning

Figure M-2. Hourly capacity runway component

Figure AM. Houriy capacity taxiway component

Figure A54 Hourly capacity gate group component

Figure AS-S. Airport houriy capacity

Figure M-6. Annual service volume

Figure M-7. Hourly delay

Figure AS-8. Daily delay

Figure A!&9. Tabulation hourly demand for representative days

Figure M-10. Hourly &lay, different demands

Figure M-L 1. Annual delay

Figure M-12. Savings associated with reduced delay

Figure M-13. The runway-use configuration sketches printout
g/23/83

--

.--

--

S

0

-

I

a

B;r c:

c

0

-4

-

-

Figure AS-l- Hourly capacity, AS'V, delay for long ran&,&ning m

3 (and 4)
g/23/83 AC lSO/SO60-3

Appendix 5

Hourlv JJourlv

Capacity MIX Percent Percent , Runway Exits Capac. T&G Exit. Cax>acitv

Runway-use Figure Aircraft Mix Index Arrivals Touch (00 feet) Base Factor Factor I ,

Weather Diagram INo.

/ I

No. %A %B 1 %C 80 ,% (C+3D), &Go Location' -No.,C* ,"' E P**T@e

1 2 ~3, 4 5 6-7-8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1.7

I

I I

1

I

4.

I

.

I

. - -5

. m

*

i

1 -- . .:. -

II- I

-. ,

-

-

- .. ..i

. I .

Figute AS-2. Rourly capacity runway coiaponent

5 (and 6)
g/23/83 AC 150/6050-S

Appendix 5

Taxiway Crossing Capacities

Distance Runway (Operations per Hour)

Weather Taxiway from ops Mix Arrivals and ' Departures

1

Crossing Threshold Rat; Index Mixed Operations Plus T 6 G

Figure AS-3. Hourly capacity taxiway coponent

7 (and 8)
h Non-widebody (N) Widebody (W)

?

4

.

Gate Average Gate Gate Hourly 'Gate No. Hourly

Demand Wo. Gates Gate Mix Time (Min.)

Group"

Occupancy Capac

' Ratio 0

Size Gates Capacity

(W w w (W WI w 0 w (Tw/Tn) Base

w w ' (Tn) (Tw) (R) (G*) S) (N) (G**S.N)

.l '2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 7L& 13 1 14

.
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

Appendix 5

Figure AS-S. Airport hourly capacity

11 (and 12)
r

DP

u

Percent Hourly Percent Weighting

Operating Condition Mix of Year Capacity Maximum Factor k

, No. [ Weather1 Rwy-use Diagram Index (P) (C) Capacity .,O .

.l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 4
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

Appendix 5

Sketch

1

I 1

e

I I lbms4ntl -W-l-- I

Delay Aver. Delay Hourly

Demand (Minutes) , Delay

1 No. VFR IFRIC

1 WC

apacity Hourly I15 Min. Ratio Am.1Dm.1 (Minutes) _ ,

2 3 4 5 16 7 9 16 L8

I

Arrival Delay Depart. Delay Profile

Percent Mix Index Factor Index Factor Factor

Arrivals Index AD1 e ADF DDI DDF , DPF

10 1 11 1 2 13

Figure AS-7. Hourly delay

15 (and 16j
s/&s3 AC 150/5060-5

Appendix 5

__. . . * . _ .

I

Arrival Delay &part. Delay Delay Aver. Delay Hr*r :y

De 12,:. Hourly , -D/C &fix 'Index Fat tor (Minutes)

Barr ‘Misc. Demand ICapacity ~RatiO Index ADI DPF Arr. 'aP. ___.__ ::. (Mincitc~.

8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 .

w.

3 4 5 6 7 - -. t

I

i

24rOO-OlrOO -___.__ -.I

I

01:00-02:00 ---I

1

I 02:00=03rOO I we

I

03100-04too _-e.. - - --_._ . _ - . 3

1 I. 04100-05~00 ----.--.m ._* .

i

05:00-06100 _

i

06:00-07:00 -_ .- -l A

07:00-OS:00 ----. i

08:00-09tOO .-.I

;

f

ogsoo-lot00

lOrOO-llt00

ll:OO-12too

l?tOO-13tOO

I

mroo-14tO0 f

14too-15x00

lStOO-16~00

e

16aOO-17100

17:00-18~00 -*. _

1. 18:00-19tOO

I

19:00-20:oo

21100.22:oo I

I 22:00-23100

23~00-24~00 ! I I I

c

e

Daily Delay

I 4

Figure AS-8. ~eily UelaY

17 (and lq?

- ., -- .

;.

i
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

Appendix 5

19 (and 20)
g/23/83 AC 150/5060-S

Appendix 5

Figure AS-lo. Hourly delay, different demands

21 (and 22)
T I!bqgx?sentative Day(s)
AC 150/5060-5 CHG 2

Appendix 5

AClass

12.5OOPounds or less

Single Engine

Aircraft Percent of Dollars Av%iqe

Aircraft Minute cost

l-3 Seats 0.60

4 + Seats (GA) 1.00 L

4 + Seats (AT) 1.80

CIass B

12.5OOPounds or less

.

Piston Twin (GA) 2.50

Multi Engine Piston Twin (AT) I 3.70

Turbine Twin (GA) 5.20

Turbine Twin (AT) I I 6.80 1

CIass c

12,5oOt0 300,OOOPounds

Piston Engine (GA) 2.80

Piston Engine (AT) 4.00

-

Piston Engine (AC) 2.90

Turbine Twin (GA) 5.60

Turbine Twin*(AT) 7.30

Turbine Twin (AC) 6.60

I Turbine Four (AC) 1 I- 15.10~~ I2 Engine Jet (GA)

2 Engine Jet (AT)

13.60

16.80

2 Engine Jet (AC) 22.00 I

3 Engine Jet (AC) 31.40

4 Engine Jet (AC) I

I I

CIass D

Over 300,OOOPounds

2 Engine Jet (AC)

3 Engine Jet (AC)

39.00

57.60

I I

4 Engine Jet (AC) I 79.30

Helicopters Piston (GA) 1.40

.

Piston (AT) 2.30

Turbine (GA)

Turbine (AT)

Totals Iloo cost

GA) General Aviation (AT) Air Taxi (AC) Air Carrier

Low High

II Current Delay (000 Minutes) I ~ I II

Projected Delay (000 Minutes)

Potential Savings (000 Minutts)

Average Cost Per Minute I

II Projected Benefit Per Year (000 Dollars) I I II

Figure A512. Savings associated with reduced delay
l%=====-

700’ to ‘arw

-----m-c---

w -

JW

7’

7oa” to 8400’

--j

12 a AA o,, l 4- e ëI

I * 1 700 t o 8400’ I -:ux ‘I --- ,* -- ---- ,‘-.. - -- tII__--1

**

-- I I

.

44: . a4004 + - - a400’ t

v-c----- l

700’

AA

 to a4fw t-,

k!

c

d

I ub
AC 150 50604 CHG 2

Appendix 5

Figure A5-13. The away-use cmf;gurztion sketcks pnntout

*U.S. GOVERNMENT PUlNTING OF’FlCEr 1996 - 722AUJ/83232