alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Loretta BOSS et al. v. Nathaniel TWILLIE, and Allstate Insurance Company.

No. 11302.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

May 9, 1977.

*1262Wayne H. Carlton, Jr., Orlando G. Benda-na, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellants, Loretta Boss and Wanda J. Davis.

John W. Anthony, Bogalusa, for defendants-appellees.

Before ELLIS, CHIASSON and PONDER, JJ.

CHIASSON, Judge.

This is an appeal of the amounts awarded by the Trial Judge to Wanda J. Davis and Loretta Boss, plaintiffs-appellants, for the pain and suffering they sustained as the result of an automobile accident.

Following a trial on the merits, the Trial Judge awarded Wanda J. Davis, who suffered a strained shoulder, $250.00 and Loretta Boss, who suffered a strain of the mid-back, $750.00.

Before the Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a Trial Court the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making the award. *Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.,*La., 341 So.2d 332 (1976).

The accident occurred on April 14, 1974. Wanda J. Davis, who complained of intermittent pain, was examined by Dr. William Fisher on May 8, 1974. Dr. Fisher’s only finding was tenderness in the area of the thoracic trapezius muscle. Dr. Fisher concluded that the appellant had suffered a strain of the left shoulder as a result of the accident. He prescribed local heat, a muscle relaxer and a tranquilizer. On June 7, 1974, following a week without pain, Dr. Fisher discharged the appellant.

On May 8, 1974, Dr. Fisher also examined Loretta Boss. The appellant’s chief complaint was a continuous aching pain in the lower back. Dr. Fisher’s examination revealed a moderate loss of lumbar lordosis; a severe limitation of flexion, hyperextension, right and left lateral flexion at the waist; and tenderness from the level of the T-10 to L-l vertebrae bilaterally with no muscle spasm. Dr. Fisher concluded that the appellant had suffered a strain of the mid-back as a result of the accident and that this was complicated by the fact the appellant was five to six months pregnant. He recommended that the appellant sit in a tub of hot water for half an hour each day, sleep on a firm mattress, lift no heavy objects, be careful in her movements and wear a special type of corset during the day. He prescribed medication to achieve muscle relaxation. The appellant was seen by Dr. Fisher for approximately one month and progressed satisfactorily. There was no indication that the appellant’s pregnancy was not following a normal course.

The record also indicates that Loretta Boss suffered some pain at the time of the accident. She was taken to Slidell Memorial Hospital, examined and released with instructions to go to Charity Hospital in New Orleans. The appellant went to Charity and medication was prescribed.

Based on the above facts, we cannot say that the award of the Trial Judge was an abuse of his discretion. Therefore, the award of the Trial Judge is affirmed at appellant’s cost.

AFFIRMED.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RONALD EUGENE REYNOLDS,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00373-CR

Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 4

of Montgomery County, Texas

(TC # 15-307889)

O R D E R

The Court has determined that it is necessary to review the original of State’s Exhibits 149 

(Client file for Kalisha Keller), 150 (Client file for George Sanchez), 151 (client file for Carolina 

Castelan), and 152 (client file for Jose and Destiny Trevino). It is therefore Ordered that Cassandra 

McCoy, Official Court Reporter of the County Court at Law Number Four for Montgomery 

County, Texas, prepare a supplemental Reporter’s Record to include the original of State’s 

Exhibits 149, 150, 151, and 152 and forward the same to this Court on or before June 26, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2017.

PER CURIAM 

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Southwest Music Distribution,
      Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB/A No. 2 for the
      period ended July 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Michery, President and Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                January 8, 2007
              /s/
                David MicheryDavid Michery, President and Chief
                Executive
                Officer
EXHIBIT
      32.1




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted), the undersigned, Charles J. Drake, Chairman of the Board and Chief
      Executive Officer of Integral Vision, Inc. (the *“Company”* ),
      hereby
      certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:




1. **** The
      Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006
      (the *“Periodic
      Report”* ),
      to
      which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. **** The
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period
      covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for
      the
      period covered by the Periodic Report.




DATED:
            March
                17, 2007/S/
                Charles J. DrakeCharles
                J. DrakeChairman
                of the Board andChief
                Executive Officer
<Page>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

     I, Russell K. Girling, Chief Financial Officer of TC PipeLines GP, Inc.,
the general partner of TC PipeLines, LP (the Partnership), in compliance with
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hereby certify in connection with the
Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) on
the date hereof, that:

     o   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     o   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Partnership.

Dated: November 13, 2003

                                     /s/ Russell K. Girling
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                     Russell K. Girling
                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                     TC PipeLines GP, Inc., as general partner
                                     of TC PipeLines, LP
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTwo time scale output feedback regulation for ill-conditioned systemsIssues pertaining to the well-posedness of a two time scale approach to the output feedback regulator design problem are examined. An approximate quadratic performance index which reflects a two time scale decomposition of the system dynamics is developed. It is shown that, under mild assumptions, minimization of this cost leads to feedback gains providing a second-order approximation of optimal full system performance. A simplified approach to two time scale feedback design is also developed, in which gains are separately calculated to stabilize the slow and fast subsystem models. By exploiting the notion of combined control and observation spillover suppression, conditions are derived assuring that these gains will stabilize the full-order system. A sequential numerical algorithm is described which obtains output feedback gains minimizing a broad class of performance indices, including the standard LQ case. It is shown that the algorithm converges to a local minimum under nonrestrictive assumptions. This procedure is adapted to and demonstrated for the two time scale design formulations.Document ID19860016584Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsCalise, A. J.*(Drexel Univ. Philadelphia, PA, United States)*Moerder, D. D.*(Drexel Univ. Philadelphia, PA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1986Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategoryCyberneticsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:3972NASA-CR-3972Accession Number86N26056Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-66-01-02CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-243Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860016584.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Jose Garcia DE LOS SALMONES, Appellant, v. Allen D. STOLAR, Appellee.

No. 77-590.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 11, 1978.

Hendricks & Hendricks, Miami, for appellant.

Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Knight and Fred R. Ober, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY and KEHOE, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals a summary final judgment entered in favor of the defendant in an action for damages wherein defendant, an attorney at law, was charged with negligently representing plaintiff in connection with the purchase of a hotel from defendant’s client. The defendant denied that he was negligent or that he breached any duty owed to the plaintiff.

The trial court found there were no genuine issues as to any material fact and that the defendant was entitled to a summary final judgment as a matter of law.

This appeal questions the propriety of such judgment. Our review of the record convinces us that there are genuine issues of material fact so as to preclude a summary disposition. Among the disputed issues of fact is whether there was an attorney-client relationship between the parties in relation to the purchase of the hotel; if so, was the defendant guilty of any negligence that resulted in damages to the plaintiff.

Therefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.
exh10_2.htm


    Exhibit
      10.2

     

    
      FIRST
        AMENDMENT TO

      EMPLOYMENT
        AGREEMENT OF DAVID CRINER

       

      FIRST
        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”), effective as of November
        15, 2007, is made by and between IMMUNOSYN CORPORATION, a
        Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and DAVID CRINER (the
“Executive”).

       

      WHEREAS,
        the parties hereto entered into an Employment Agreement, dated as of October
        22,
        2007 (the “Agreement”);

       

      WHEREAS,
        capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings
        ascribed thereto in the Agreement;

       

      WHEREAS,
        the parties desire to amend the Agreement as provided herein; and

       

      WHEREAS,
        the parties desire the terms of this Amendment to be retroactive to the date
        of
        the Agreement.

       

      NOW,
        THEREFORE, the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as
        follows.

       

      1.           Section 3(a)
        of the Agreement is hereby deleted and restated in its entirety, as
        follows:

       

      “3.    (a)   Base
        Salary.  During the Term, the Company shall pay the Executive a
        base salary (“Base Salary”).  The Base Salary shall be Three Thousand
        Dollars ($3,000 USD) per month (or pro rata portion thereof) payable
        semi-monthly (less applicable taxes and withholdings) (if calculated on an
        annualized basis, such Base Salary would result in an annual salary of Thirty
        Six Thousand Dollars ($36,000.00 USD)).  The Base Salary shall be
        subject to annual review by the Board or the Compensation Committee thereof
        for
        discretionary periodic increases but not decreases.”

       

      2.           Except
        as amended hereby, all of the terms and provisions of the Agreement shall
        remain
        in full force and effect.

       

      3.           This
        Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts and via facsimile,
        each of
        which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute
        one and the same instrument.

       

      IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Amendment as
        of the day and year first above written.

       

      
        	
              	
                IMMUNOSYN
                  CORPORATION

                 

              	 
	 	By:   	/s/
                Douglas McClain, Jr. 	 
	 	 	Name: 
                Douglas McClain, Jr.
Title:   
                Chairman of the Board	 
	 	
                 

                /s/
                  David Criner

              	 
	 	DAVID
                CRINER
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 166 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 166

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Oregon Resource Conservation Act of 1996 to reauthorize 
 the participation of the Bureau of Reclamation in the Deschutes River 
                  Conservancy, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Deschutes River Conservancy 
Reauthorization Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PARTICIPATION OF BUREAU OF RECLAMATION IN 
              DESCHUTES RIVER CONSERVANCY.

    Section 301 of the Oregon Resource Conservation Act of 1996 
(division B of Public Law 104-208; 110 Stat. 3009-534) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Deschutes River 
                Basin Working Group'' and inserting ``Deschutes River 
                Conservancy Working Group''; and
                    (B) by striking paragraph (5) and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(5) Quorum.--The term `quorum' means 8 of those qualified 
        Working Group members appointed and eligible to serve.'';
            (2) in subsection (b)(3), by inserting before the period at 
        the end the following: ``, and up to a total amount of 
        $2,000,000 during each of fiscal years 2006 through 2015''; and
            (3) in subsection (h), by inserting before the period at 
        the end the following: ``, and $2,000,000 for each of fiscal 
        years 2006 through 2015''.

            Passed the Senate November 16, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 166

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Oregon Resource Conservation Act of 1996 to reauthorize 
 the participation of the Bureau of Reclamation in the Deschutes River 
                  Conservancy, and for other purposes.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 162 (Thursday, August 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22212]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. ER97-3494-000, ER97-3497-000, ER97-3498-000, ER97-3500-
000, ER97-3503-000, ER97-3515-000, and ER97-3517-000]


The Empire District Electric Company; Notice of Filing

August 15, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 16, 1997, The Empire District Electric 
Company tendered for filing amendments in the above-referenced dockets.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426 in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before August 27, 1997. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22212 Filed 8-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### John J. SCHREY, Appellant, v. Cheryl J. SCHREY, Appellee.

No. 76-2408.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 17, 1978.

*406John R. Young of Hamilton, James, Mer-kle & Young, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert T. Clelland, Jr., Port Lauderdale, for appellee.

BURNSTEIN, MIETTE K., Associate Judge.

This is a dissolution of marriage and child custody case filed in the Florida courts by the father, appellant herein. The appellant and the children were Florida residents, and the wife, appellee, was properly and constructively served. Appellee moved to dismiss on the grounds that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter because appellee had previously filed a divorce action against appellant in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, although such pleading reflected no prayer for custody. The Florida trial court granted the motion to dismiss based on a finding that the court lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter and this appeal followed. We reverse as to the finding that the court lacked jurisdiction over the children in order to determine custody.

Each state is charged with the duty to regulate the custody of infants within its borders. This is true even though the parents reside in another state or if the child’s domicile is in another state. *DiGiorgio v. DiGiorgio,*153 Fla. 24, 13 So.2d 596 (Fla.1943). It is even true where a parent, in bad faith, removes the child from one state to another. *State v. Webster,*151 So.2d 14 (Fla.3d DCA 1963).

The paramount concern of the court should be the best interest of the child’s welfare. *Silvestri v. Silvestri,*309 So.2d 29 (Fla.3d DCA 1975).

The trial court erred in not exercising its jurisdiction and ruling in accordance therewith.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DOWNEY and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1
                                                                   ------------

SUBSIDIARIES OF TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC.:
----------------------------------------------------
THCR Holding Corp. (Delaware corporation)
THCR/LP Corporation (Delaware corporation)
Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Holdings, L.P. (Delaware limited partnership)
Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Funding, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Atlantic City Holding, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Atlantic City Funding, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Atlantic City Funding II, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Atlantic City Funding III, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Atlantic City Associates (New Jersey general partnership)
Trump Taj Mahal Associates (New Jersey general partnership)
Trump Plaza Associates (New Jersey general partnership)
Trump Atlantic City Corporation (Delaware corporation)
THCR Enterprises, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
THCR Enterprises, L.L.C. (New Jersey limited liability company)
THCR Ventures, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Development Company, L.L.C. (Delaware limited
  liability company)
Trump International Casino Ltd. (Ontario corporation)
Trump Internet Casino, L.L.C. (Delaware limited liability company)
THCR Management Services, L.L.C. (Delaware limited liability company)
Trump Indiana, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump's Castle Hotel & Casino, Inc. (New Jersey corporation)
Trump's Castle Funding, Inc. (New Jersey corporation)
Trump's Castle Associates, L.P. (New Jersey limited partnership)


SUBSIDIARIES OF TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS HOLDINGS, L.P.:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Funding, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Atlantic City Holding, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Atlantic City Funding, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Atlantic City Funding II, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Atlantic City Funding III, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Atlantic City Associates (New Jersey general partnership)
Trump Taj Mahal Associates (New Jersey general partnership)
Trump Plaza Associates (New Jersey general partnership)
Trump Atlantic City Corporation (Delaware corporation)
THCR Enterprises, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
THCR Enterprises, L.L.C. (New Jersey limited liability company)
THCR Ventures, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Development Company, L.L.C. (Delaware limited
  liability company)
Trump International Casino Ltd. (Ontario corporation)
Trump Internet Casino, L.L.C. (Delaware limited liability company)
THCR Management Services, L.L.C. (Delaware limited liability company)
Trump Indiana, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump's Castle Hotel & Casino, Inc. (New Jersey corporation)
Trump's Castle Funding, Inc. (New Jersey corporation)
Trump's Castle Associates, L.P. (New Jersey limited partnership)


SUBSIDIARIES OF TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS FUNDING, INC.:
------------------------------------------------------------
None
No. 00-7080.

#### Moreno-Cerna *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Sustaining the Pack: 8th FW PowerPro keeps lights on, aircraft safe

/ Published Dec. 28, 2018
KUNSAN AIR BASE, Republic of Korea, *Author’s Note: This is the second article in a series designed to highlight innovative efforts, large and small, that are improving infrastructure at Kunsan Air Base. These both save the Air Force money and improve mission readiness for generations of Airmen to come.**Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Kunsan Air Base website.*
#### J. W. EISELE, Appellant, v. Saul DOPPELT f/t/u/b of Phoenix of Hartford, Appellee.

No. 69-26.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

June 3, 1969.

Rehearing Denied July 25,1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.