alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UNITED
      STATES**


**SECURITIES
      AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**


**Washington,
      DC 20549**











**FORM
      8-K**


**CURRENT
      REPORT**





**Pursuant
      to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934**





Date
      of
      Report (Date of earliest event reported):  July 27, 2007





**NEWPORT
      BANCORP, INC.**


(Exact
      name of registrant as specified in its charter)





**Maryland**
            **0-51856**
            **20-4465271**(State
                or other jurisdiction of
            (Commission
            (IRS
                Employerincorporation
                or organization)
            File
                Number)
            Identification
                No.)








**100
                Bellevue Avenue, Newport, Rhode Island**
            **02840**(Address
                of principal executive offices)
            (Zip
                Code)





Registrant’s
      telephone number, including area code:  **(401)
      847-5500**





**Not
      Applicable**


(Former
      name or former address, if changed since last report)








Check
      the
      appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
      satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
      provisions:





o  Written
      communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
      230.425)





o  Soliciting
      material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
      240.14a-12)





o  Pre-commencement
      communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
      240.14d-2(b))





o  Pre-commencement
      communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
      240.13e-4(c))








**Item
                2.02**
            **Results
                of Operations and Financial
                Condition**





On
      July 27, 2007, Newport Bancorp, Inc.
      issued a press release to announce its financial results for the quarter ended
      June 30, 2007.  A copy of the press release is attached as Exhibit
      99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by
      reference.





**Item
                9.01**
            **Financial
                Statements and
                Exhibits.**





(d)
            Exhibits





Number
            Description99.1
            Press
                Release dated July 27, 2007








**SIGNATURES**





Pursuant
      to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
      has
      duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
      duly authorized.








NEWPORT
                BANCORP, INC.(Registrant)Date:
                July 30, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                Bruce A. WalshBruce
                A. WalshSenior
                Vice President and Chief
              Financial
                Officer
RB

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0626

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JESSICA ELAINE HURT,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 60-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including September 19, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 12 2023

07/12/2023
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46395-46396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23196]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Reports, Forms and Recordkeeping Requirements, Agency Information 
Collection Activity Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information 
Collection (ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR describes 
the nature of the information collection and its expected burden. The 
Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting 
comments on the following collection of information was published on 
April 9, 1997, [62 FR 17276-17277].

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before September 2, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judith Street, ABC-100; Federal 
Aviation Administration; 800 Independence Avenue, SW.; Washington, DC 
20591; Telephone number (202) 267-9895.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
    Title: Bird Strike Incident/Ingestion Report.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0045.
    Type of Request: Extension of currently approved collection.
    Form(s): FAA5200-7.
    Affected Public: Individuals and Federal Government.
    Abstract: Bird strike data are collected to develop standards and 
monitor hazards to aviation. Data identify bird strike control 
requirements and provide in-service data on aircraft component failure. 
We estimate 2000 incident reports annually at approximately 5 minutes 
per report.
    Annual Estimated Burden Hours: 125 annual burden hours.

Addresses: Send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725-17th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20503, Attention FAA Desk Officer.
    Comments are Invited on: Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the Department, including whether the information will have practical 
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed information collection;

[[Page 46396]]

ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to 
be collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on respondents, including the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology.

    Issued in Washington, DC on August 26, 1997.
Phillip A. Leach,
Clearance Officer, United States Department of Transportation
[FR Doc. 97-23196 Filed 8-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-U
EXHIBIT 32(a)

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 of Citizens Holding Company (the
Company), as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), I, Greg L. McKee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 6, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Greg L. McKee                    
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Greg L. McKee                        
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

**PERIODIC REPORT CERTIFICATION**

**of the Chief Executive Officer**

 

I, Philip F. Otto, certify that:

 
| 1. |  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Optical Communication Products, Inc.; |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.             The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.             Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.             Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.             All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.             Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

/s/ Philip F. Otto                          

Philip F. Otto

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

August 11, 2006

 

 

----
Exhibit
32.1
 
 Accountabilities,  Inc.
 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 (18
U.S.C. Section 1350)
 
 In
connection with the annual report of Accountabilities, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey
J. Raymond, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 2.
            the
      information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.
 
 
 Dated: December
      23, 2008
            By:
            /s/
      Jeffrey J. RaymondJeffrey
      J. RaymondChief
      Executive Officer
#### Samuel Essie BARKET, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 51192.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 16, 1978.

Rehearing Denied April 11, 1978.

Albert J. Datz and Samuel S. Jacobson, of Datz, Jacobson & Dusek, Jacksonville, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.

*264PER CURIAM.

Following his conviction for receiving stolen property, Samuel Barket appealed to the First District Court of Appeal challenging the validity of former Florida Standard Jury Instruction 2.06, insofar as it allowed the jury to find him guilty without proof of his actual knowledge that property in his possession was stolen.1 The district court affirmed Barket’s conviction and certified its decision to us as having passed upon a question of great public interest.2 We accept jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution.

The district court correctly rejected each of Barket’s challenges to the jury instruction, and properly affirmed his conviction. When our instruction on the type of proof necessary to attribute to a defendant knowledge that goods in his possession were stolen is considered with all other instructions given to the jury relative to the state’s burden of proof, we cannot say that there is error which requires a reversal of Barket’s conviction. *Forrest v. State,*133 Fla. 310, 182 So. 849 (1938). The certified question is answered accordingly, and the decision of the district court is affirmed.3

OVERTON, C. J., and BOYD, ENGLAND and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.

ADKINS, J., dissents.

1

.The challenged portion of the jury instruction provides:

> “It is not necessary for the state to prove that the defendant knew beyond a reasonable doubt that the property had been stolen. It is sufficient if the circumstances of the transaction were so suspicious as to put a person of ordinary intelligence and caution upon inquiry and, nevertheless, the defendant did buy it, receive it or aid in concealing it.” This instruction has been amended to reflect changes to former § 811.16, Fla.Stat. (1973), which now appear in § 812.031, Fla.Stat. (1975).

2

. The district court’s opinion is reported at 342 So.2d 526.

3

. Having determined the certified question, we decline to entertain other issues raised here by petitioner but resolved by the district court.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 2, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 46229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23229]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[FRL-5883-5]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Rhode Island; Reasonably Available Control Technology for Nitrogen 
Oxides

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) 
revision submitted by the State of Rhode Island. This revision 
establishes and requires Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) 
at stationary sources of nitrogen oxides (NOX). In the Final 
Rules Section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's 
SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the 
Agency views this as a noncontroversial revision amendment and 
anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval 
is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are 
received in response to that direct final rule, no further activity is 
contemplated in relation to this proposed rule. If EPA receives adverse 
comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public 
comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on 
this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on 
this proposal. Any parties interested in commenting on this proposal 
should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 2, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Susan Studlien, Deputy Director, 
Office of Ecosystem Protection (mail code CAA), U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region I, JFK Federal Bldg., Boston, MA 02203. 
Copies of the State submittal and EPA's technical support document are 
available for public inspection during normal business hours, by 
appointment at the Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region I, One Congress Street, 11th floor, Boston, 
MA, and Division of Air and Hazardous Materials, Rhode Island 
Department of Environmental Management, 291 Promenade Street, 
Providence, RI 02908-5767.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven A. Rapp, Environmental 
Engineer, Air Quality Planning Unit (CAQ), U.S. EPA, Region I, JFK 
Federal Building, Boston, MA 02203-2211; (617) 565-2773; 
[email protected]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, see the direct 
final rule which is located in the Rules Section of this Federal 
Register.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401--7671q.

    Dated: August 19, 1997.
John P. DeVillars,
Regional Administrator, Region I.
[FR Doc. 97-23229 Filed 8-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
#### SUN INSURANCE OFFICE, LTD., Appellant, v. Charles F. PHILLIPS and Patricia Phillips, Appellees.

No. 69-277.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Jan. 9, 1970.

Benjamin H. Hill, III, of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings & Evans, Tampa, for appellant.

Richard Mulholland, Tampa, for appel-lees.

MANN, Judge.

The Phillips’ unsworn complaint alleges that the insurer denied that its coverage of $10,000 on each of three vehicles owned by Mr. Phillips made available to Phillips $30,-000 coverage under the uninsured motorist provision. The insurer filed a motion to dismiss and to compel arbitration, to which it attached an affidavit of its manager to the effect that the insurer admitted coverage in the amount of $30,000 and had never denied it. This motion was denied and this appeal ensued.

The insurer has a right under its contract to arbitration and promptly moved to compel it pursuant to Florida Statutes § 682.03 (1969), F.S.A. The order denying the “motion to dismiss and to compel arbitration” is appealable under Section 682.20 in spite of coupling with the motion to compel arbitration a motion to dismiss. Southeastern Title & Insurance Co. v. Curtis, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 855, apparently involved a motion less artfully drawn. We express no opinion on the wisdom of that decision.

We do not deal here with a case in which coverage is denied, as in Cruger v. Allstate Insurance Co., Fla.App.1964, 162 So.2d 690, and American Southern Insurance Co. *18v. Daniel, Fla.App. 1967, 198 So.2d 850. Both the fact and extent of coverage are here admitted.

Where the record shows no justiciable issue and the contractual right to arbitration a motion to compel it should be granted. Bohlmann v. Allstate Insurance Co., Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 23; Netherlands Insurance Co. v. Moore, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 191.

This opinion is not to be taken as authority for the proposition that the extent of coverage is as the insurer has herein agreed. That question is not before us.

Reversed and remanded with directions to compel arbitration.

LILES, A. C. J., and PIERCE, J., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries V, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 13, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries V, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-K
the year ended  December  31, 1996 for May Limited Partnership  1983-1 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000725650
<NAME>                        May Limited Partnership 1983-1
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         115
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  59
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               174
<PP&E>                                         7,302
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          22
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     391
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   413
<SALES>                                        333
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               340
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  46
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               10
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                179
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            179
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   179
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  19.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  19.52
        


</TABLE>
# Richmond employees help local community

/ Published Sept. 5, 2017
Richmond, Va, 
The new school year has begun in the greater Richmond area and Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, employees organized a group of givers who helped students in need by contributing school supplies to the local Bensley Elementary School, one of the schools in Chesterfield County. 

Defense Logistics Agency Aviation’s Norma Hendricks, a material planner in the Planning Process Directorate said this is one way to help out the community. She said employees, from the Customer Intelligence-Focused Team, donated the items and volunteers donated their time Aug. 29 to deliver the items to the school. 

“Giving the donated school supplies directly to the schools allows teachers to give the supplies to the particular students in need,” said Hendricks.  

She said the group also organized a clothing drive for the Richmond Chapter of Dress for Success Central Virginia to donate lightly-worn items that help low-income women prepare for job interviews. Bins are located in the Center Restaurant dining area for collecting clothing through Sept. 6.