alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                  Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In  connection  with the  quarterly  filing  of Maxim  Mortgage  Corporation,  a
Delaware  corporation (the "Company"),  on Form 10QSB for the period ended March
31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the "Report"),
I, Joel  Arberman,  Director,  Chief  Executive  and  Financial  Officer  of the
Company,  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C.ss.1350), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/S/Joel Arberman
Joel Arberman
Chief Executive and Financial Officer
May 20, 2003
```
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofVillageEDOCS (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period endedSeptember 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

| Date:  November 14,  2002                                                         | /s/ K. Mason Conner                        |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|           ------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------ |
|                                                                                             | President and Chief Executive  Officer     |
Appendix A.  Complete‐Mix Activated Sludge: Bioreactor and Secondary Clarifier

Flow Rate,

MGD

Capital Costs,

$MM (2007)

Capital Costs,

$MM (2010) [ENR

CCI]

Total  (O&M)

Labor Costs,

$MM

Total Energy

Costs, $MM

[$0.1/kwh]

Material

Costs, $MM

Total O&M Costs,

$MM

0.5 3.57 3.9 0.123 0.0343 0.0178 0.1751

5 16.8 18.6 0.275 0.327 0.0762 0.6782

10 27.9 30.8 0.378 0.644 0.109 1.131

25 92.6 102.3 0.612 1.61 0.205 2.427

50 149 164.6 0.913 3.22 0.318 4.451

% of O&M

that is labor

% of O&M

that is

energy

70% 20%

41% 48%

33% 57%

25% 66%

21% 72%

Avg 38% 53%

Source: CapdetWorks v2.5

Design Basis mg/L

BOD 400

COD 908

y = 5.9749x0.8228

R2 = 0.9804

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

140.0

160.0

180.0

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Capital Costs, $MM (2010) [ENR CCI]

3 5

Total Energy Costs, $MM [$0.1/kwh] Comparison of EPA 1980 and CapdetWorks Capital

y = 0.2546x0.6969

R2 = 0.9898

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Total O&M Costs, $MM

A‐1

Capdet Works

Capital Cost

Updated EPA 1980

Capital Cost

3 4

22 23

40 38

84 74

149 123

y = 0.0674x0.9856

R2 = 1

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Total Energy Costs, $MM [$0.1/kwh]

0

50

100

150

200

12345

$MM

Comparison of EPA 1980 and CapdetWorks Capital

Cost

Capdet Works Capital Cost Updated EPA 1980 Capital Cost

A‐1
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6**  **350**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appell ee ,
v. RICHARD LYNN WILLIAMS , Defendant

- Appell ant
. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville
. Richard L. Voorhees , District Judge. ( 5 : 01

- c r - 00 012

- RLV

- 1; 5:12

- cv - 00132

- RLV )

Submitted : July 29, 2014 Decided: July 31, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
. Richard Lynn Williams , Appellant Pro Se. Jack M. Knight, Jr. , Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Richa rd Lynn Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order d ismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S . 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a de batable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss t he appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
TheHonorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western 1 District of Arkansas. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-3045

___________ Frank Mahan, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. International Paper Company, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: February 10, 1998

Filed: March 5, 1998

___________ Before McMILLIAN, WOLLMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. FrankM ahan appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment i n 1 favor of his former employer, Int ernational Paper Company, in his action brought under the Age Discrim

ination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. (1994). Having carefully r

eviewed the record and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we agree withthe district court that Mahan has presented no evidence indicating that age was a factor in the decision to terminate him, or that International Paper’s proffered reasonThe pa rties’ joint motion to strike certain portions of the Joint Appendix i s 2 granted. -2- for its decision not to rehire him was pretextual. See Herrero v. St. Louis Univ. Hosp. , 10 9 F.3d 481, 483-84 (8th Cir. 1997) (detailing prima facie case within reduction-in

forc e context); Ryther v. KARE 11 , 108 F.3d 832, 836-38 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert . denied , 117 S. Ct. 2510 (1997) (detailing classic b urden-shifting framework). Summary judg ment was therefore properly entered and Mahan’s motion for reconsideratio n pro perly denied. Because an extended opinion would have no precedential value, w e affirm without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. The judgment is affirmed. 2 A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# DSCR recognizes annual Fire Prevention Week

/ Published Oct. 16, 2018
Richmond, Va, 
Defense Supply Center, Richmond, Virginia recognized National Fire Prevention Week with a huge kick-off in support of this year’s theme “Look. Listen. Learn. Be aware Fire can happen anywhere,” on Oct. 9.   

As part of the kick-off festivities, Defense Logistics Agency Installation Operations Richmond’s Fire and Emergency Services personnel manned an informational display in Building 46 to help raise awareness and disseminate educational materials pertaining to fire safety. 

“I think it’s important that we recognize events like National Fire Prevention Week because most people don’t take fire safety seriously until they have been directly impacted by a fire,” said Daryhl Page, DLA Installation Operations Richmond fire inspector. “Therefore it’s important for us to educate the public as well as the workforce on fire safety in the workplace and in the home.”  

In addition to the informational display, the fire prevention staff brought out the Safety House. The Safety House is a mobile home that has been configured to simulate natural disasters such as hurricanes and tornadoes as well as fires and can also serve as a make-shift pull station. A pull station is an active fire protection device that is usually wall-mounted and when activated, initiates a fire alarm system. 

According to emergency services personnel, the Safety House is a good apparatus to use when educating people on fire safety. 

“It is a great training tool especially for children because it gives them the opportunity to see the hazards associated with fires and natural disasters firsthand without them actually having to face the dangers linked to these conditions,” said Kevin Gordon, DLA Installation Operations Richmond fire inspector. “This way they are able to learn about the importance of fire safety and have fun while doing it.” 

For more information on National Fire Prevention Week, go to https://www.nfpa.org/Public-Education/Campaigns/Fire-Prevention-Week
Order entered May 27, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00421-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.A.G.A., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. JC-20-00439-W

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ May 26, 2022 motion to extend time to file 

their jurisdictional letter brief. Appellants assert the appellate record is incomplete, 

and they seek a fourteen-day extension to allow for the filing and review of the 

supplemental record.

We GRANT the motion to the extent we ORDER Martha Grant, Official 

Court Reporter for the 304th Judicial District Court, and Dallas County District 

Clerk Felicia Pitre to file, no later than June 1, 2022, the requested supplemental 

reporter’s and clerk’s records, respectively. We further ORDER appellants to file 

their jurisdictional letter brief no later than June 9, 2022. Because this is an 
accelerated appeal in a child protection case, we caution that further extension 

requests will be disfavored.

Appellants’ brief on the merits is suspended pending determination of our 

jurisdiction.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this letter to Ms. 

Grant, Ms. Pitre, and the parties.

/s/ DENNISE GARCIA

JUSTICE
# Distribution’s Lewis receives command assignment to Army’s 308th Brigade Support Battalion

/ Published March 16, 2018
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Army Lt. Col. Christina Lewis, DLA Distribution Future Plans, has been selected to command the 308th Brigade Support Battalion, 17th Field Artillery Brigade, out of Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington.

The 17th Field Artillery Brigade deploys worldwide as a Force Field Artillery Headquarters to plan, synchronize, and employ joint and combined fires and precision strike capabilities in support of I Corps.

Lewis, who was promoted to the rank of Lieutenant Colonel during a Feb. 2 ceremony, currently serves as DLA Distribution Future Plans’ European Command/Africa Command planner. 

Congratulating Lewis on her selection, DLA Distribution commanding general Army Brig. Gen. John S. Laskodi said, “This is an extremely competitive process and few are given the privilege to command at this level.  This is great news for her and her family, for the Army, the DoD, and for the Nation.”

Commissioned in May 2001 from Lock Haven University of Pennsylvania, Lewis was branch detailed as Air Defense Artillery (ADA) officer for two years, with a main branch of Ordnance.  She served as the company commander of Golf Forward Support Company, 2-82 FA Battalion, 3rd Armored Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cav Division (CD) in Mosul and Fort Hood.  Her other assignments include Headquarters/Maintenance platoon leader, Delta Battery, 2-1 ADA Battalion; shop officer, 178th Maintenance Company, 2-1 ADA Battalion; Battalion S-4, 2-1 ADA Battalion; readiness officer, G-4 32d Army Air and Missile Defense Command;  deputy J4, Detainee Ops, Multi-National Force–Iraq; Brigade S-4, 31st ADA Brigade; SPO plans officer, 215 Brigade Support Battalion, 3/1 CD; Brigade S-4, 3/1 CD; SPO, 215 Brigade Support Battalion, 3/1 CD; Distribution Integration branch chief, 3d Expeditionary Support Command, XVIII Armored Brigade Combat Team and executive officer, Officer Readiness Division, US Army Human Resources Command.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 9, 2017

s0606 

# Order

Clerk June 9, 2017

154103

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154103

COA: 331966

Oakland CC: 2011

- 236622

- FH

BARBARA MIRA JOHNSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 27, 2016 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 10.16

September 27,
2001

Joseph
K. O'Brien
Chief Financial Officer
9300 North Decatur
Portland, Oregon 97203

Dear
Joe:

I
am pleased to advise you that U.S. Bank National Association ("Bank") has agreed to modify the terms and conditions under which your line of credit is available.

Borrower:

Phoenix Gold International, Inc.Amount:

$5,000,000.00Expiry Date:

January 31, 2002


All
of the terms and conditions set out in the loan documents dated January 29, 2001 continue to apply except for the following:

If
the above modifications of the terms and conditions are acceptable to you, please sign, date and return the acknowledgement copy of this letter.

Sincerely,

/s/DAVID WYNDE

David
Wynde Vice President(503) 275-3780

33

---

|Phoenix Gold International, Inc.
September 27, 2001 |  | Page 2
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ------

Borrower
hereby accepts U.S. Bank's offer to extend credit on terms and conditions stated above. Borrower hereby agrees to the Arbitration clause set forth in Exhibit B
attached hereto.

Phoenix
Gold International, Inc.

|By:    | /s/JOSEPH K. O'BRIENJoseph K. O'Brien |  | 
|------ | ------------------------------------- |  | 
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer & Secretary   |  | 
|Date:  | September 28, 2001                    |  | 

34

---

QuickLinks
|  | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or 78o(d),      and, |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  September      9, 2008 | /s/ Donald W.      Barney                            |
|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    | Donald      W. Barney                                |
|                                    | President,      Treasurer and Chief FinancialOfficer |
#### Marcus ROLLIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-439.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 20, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- Directorate Identifier: 

### 2012

- CE

- 047

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and t hen out of the changed cell

.

**Estimated Costs:**
Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost (@$8 5 /h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Inspection 4 $ 340.00 $0 $ 340.00 

### 7 $ 2,380.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00


### The known number of products in complian ce: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 2,380 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

**On**

**- Condition Co**  **sts:**
Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product



### Replacement replace pushrod PN 6015034

- 1 2.5 $ 212.50 $1,900 $ 2,112.50

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00


### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?
YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:**
Is the AD significant?
YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for
either a Yes or No answer.
YES NO Explanation:
**Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:**
This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?
YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,671
<SECURITIES>                                    11,927
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,365
<PP&E>                                          43,621
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,423
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,846
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            53
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,464
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,801
<SALES>                                        122,523
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               123,501
<CGS>                                           99,007
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   99,007
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,689
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  85
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,720
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,780
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,940
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,940
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .96
        

</TABLE>
# EMPLOYEE SPOTLIGHT:  Terry Lutz

/ Published Feb. 9, 2017
Richmond, Va., 
**Name:** Terry Lutz

**Organization:** Priority Cell, DLA Aviation at Ogden

**Years of Service:** 10

**What is your job title, and what do you do, specifically?**Customer Support Specialist. I review and submit potential material purchase requests for technical review and submission of approved packages to the Emergency Contracting Support Branch, Supplier Support Division, DLA Aviation Supplier Operations Commodities Directorate in Richmond.

**What is your fondest memory of working for DLA Aviation?** Our team-building event at the Roy Air Force Museum. We split up into teams with a “scavenger hunt list.” In order to answer the questions we needed to read all of the plaques. I learned a lot that day and enjoyed spending time with my co-workers outside of work.

**If you could speak directly to the warfighters you support, what would you tell them?**Thank you, thank you, thank you, for your service! I appreciate all your hard work and sacrifices that you and your family make daily for our freedom.

**What are some of your passions outside of work?** I love my family, friends, birds and traveling. From the Redwood Forest in California, to Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, and everywhere in-between and outside of America.  I enjoy planning trips, using "Roadside America - a guide to Uniquely Odd Tourist Attractions." One example was in Shoshone, Idaho, where there is a guide listing of "Another Ice Cave & Things."  In the middle of nowhere, there is an ice cave and attached to it is a taxidermy museum. The museum has hundreds of weird animals and even a two-headed rabbit. It is a third generation museum, we were told. It was very interesting and odd. Loved it. It is well worth the drive if you are ever near there.  

**Have you had a mentor that helped you grow in your career?  If so who, and how did they help?**Theresa McKinzie, she is by far the most knowledgeable supply person ever!  She is always willing to help, has the right answers and kind words.  She is my inspiration; I hope to reach her level of knowledge someday.****

**What is your biggest pet peeve?** Walmart shoppers. They do not look before they walk in and out of the store!

**Who is the most influential person in your life...past or present?** Maggie Wilson, my mother. She is the kindest, most loving person any one could be blessed to have. She has taught me to give life all you have and then give more; to enjoy the little things every day; to laugh, love and try to find something good in everyone and everything. 

**What five things could you absolutely not live without?** My family, friends, pet birds, lip-gloss, and make-up.

**What type of music do you most enjoy?**Top 40 and country.****