alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42259-42260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20632]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 
(SAMHSA) Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Pub.L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting of the SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel II in August.
    A summary of the meeting may be obtained from: Ms. Dee Herman, 
Committee Management Liaison, SAMHSA Office of Extramural Activities 
Review, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 17-89, Rockville, Maryland 20857. 
Telephone: 301-443-7390.
    Substantive program information may be obtained from the individual 
named as Contact for the meeting listed below.
    The meeting will include the review, discussion and evaluation of 
individual contract proposals. This discussion could reveal personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals and 
confidential and financial information about an individual's proposal. 
This discussion may also reveal information about procurement 
activities exempt from disclosure by statute and trade secrets and 
commercial or financial information obtained from a person and 
privileged and confidential. Accordingly, the

[[Page 42260]]

meeting is concerned with matters exempt from mandatory disclosure in 
Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (3), (4), and (6) and 5 U.S.C. App. 2, 
Sec. 10(d).

    Committee Name: SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel II.
    Meeting Date: August 6, 1997.
    Place: Holiday Inn, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, The Chase Room, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20815.
    Closed: August 6, 1997, 9:00 a.m.--12:00 Noon.
    Contact: Joan Harrison, 17-89, Parklawn Building, Telephone: 
301-594-2811 and FAX: 301-443-3437.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

    Dated: July 31, 1997.
Jeri Lipov,
Committee Management Officer, SAMHSA.
[FR Doc. 97-20632 Filed 8-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries III, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: January 27, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries III, Inc.
## Sacramento Regional 8-Hour Ozone Attainment And Reasonable Further Progress Plan

Public Comments and Staff Responses at the Public Hearing

Board Meeting Placer County Air Pollution Control District

February 19, 2009PUBLIC COMMENTS

Public Hearing Comments (Auburn, February 19, 2009)

Comment 1: Jason Crow, Senior Planner of Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG)

SACOG supports the adoption of the SIP documents. The SIP is especially important since all of the SACOG transportation plans and programs adopted for the region must demonstrate conformity. Without the SIP budgets, SACOG cannot demonstrate conformity and the region will enter into a conformity lapse. Basically, the conformity lapse means federal transportation dollars will be cut off and federal agencies cannot approve environmental documents. The potential impacts of not acting would be huge and SACOG feels that the timing is critical. SACOG anticipates the federal approval of the economic stimulus package and reauthoriz ation of the federal transportation bill within this next year. The region does not want to jeopardize these two opportunities for funding and improving the region’s transportation infrastructure. SACOG understands the important role of emissions coming from the transportation sector and SACOG has taken that into account in developing the region’s transportation plan. This SIP is important to meet the clean air goals for the region as well as implementing the region’s transportation plan and program.

Response: Comment noted.

Comment 2: Rick Bettes, Breathe California Sacramento Emigrant Trails

Breathe California strongly supports the Board to approve the Plan and urge them to do so. Mr. Bettes agreed with the previous speakers on the benefits of this Plan. Some
of the measures that reduce vehicle mile s traveled (VMT) and overall emissions will also have a secondary benefit of reducing particulate matter and greenhouse gases. They are critical issues that we have to face up to very shortly.

Response: Comment noted.

Comment 3: Camile Kustin, Environmental Defense Fund

Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) strongly supports the Board’s adoption of the SIP and Transportation Control Measures (TCM). The air districts’ analysis of feasible measures to include in the Plan has been comprehensive and thorough. The
combination of the control measures the air districts selected are cost effective and will achieve the needed reduction for the region to meet the federal clean air requirements and protect public health.

Response: Comment noted.

Comment 4: Angela Shepard, Cleaner Air Partnership

Clean Air Partnership supports adoption of the proposed SIP documents.

Response: Comment noted.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 168 (Friday, August 29, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 45784-45785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22994]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-184, RM-9120]


Radio Broadcasting Services; New Augusta, MS

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 45785]]

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by 
Community Broadcasting Company proposing the allotment of Channel 269A 
to New Augusta, Mississippi, as the community's first local aural 
transmission service. Channel 269A can be allotted to New Augusta in 
compliance with the Commission's minimum distance separation 
requirements with a site restriction 7.8 kilometers (4.9 miles) 
northwest in order to avoid a short-spacing conflict with the site 
specified in Station WTKX-FM's construction permit for Channel 268C, 
Pensacola, Florida. The coordinates for Channel 269A at New Augusta, 
Mississippi, are 31-13-41 NL and 89-06-47 WL.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before October 16, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before October 31, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: John S. 
Neely, Miller & Miller, P.C., P.O. Box 33003, Washington, D.C. 20033 
(Counsel for petitioner).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-184, adopted August 
13, 1997, and released August 25, 1997. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M 
Street, NW, Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also 
be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 
857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.

[FR Doc. 97-22994 Filed 8-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22411]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration
[A-351-605]


Frozen Concentrated Orange Juice From Brazil: Notice of 
Termination of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 25, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fabian Rivelis or Irina Itkin, Office 
of AD/CVD Enforcement, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
3853 or (202) 482-0656, respectively.

SUMMARY: On June 19, 1997, the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') published in the Federal Register (62 FR 33394) a notice 
announcing the initiation of an administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on frozen concentrated orange juice (``FCOJ'') 
from Brazil, covering the period May 1, 1996, through April 30, 1997. 
This review has now been terminated as a result of the withdrawal of 
the request for administrative review by the interested party.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On May 30, 1997, the Department received a request from Branco 
Peres Citrus, S.A. (Branco Peres) to conduct an administrative review 
of its entries, pursuant to 19 CFR 353.22(a) of the Department's 
regulations. The period of review is May 1, 1996, through April 30, 
1997. On June 19, 1997, the Department published in the Federal 
Register (62 FR 33394) a notice announcing the initiation of an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on FCOJ from 
Brazil, covering the period May 1, 1996, through April 30, 1997.

Termination of Review

    On August 4, 1997, we received a timely request for withdrawal of 
the request for administrative review from Branco Peres. Because there 
were no other requests for administrative review from any other 
interested party, in accordance with section 353.22(a)(5) of the 
Department's regulations, we have terminated this administrative 
review.
    This notice is published in accordance with section 751 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675) and 19 CFR 
353.22(a)(5).

    Dated: August 14, 1997.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-22411 Filed 8-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
NO. 07-09-0069-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

APRIL 29, 2009

______________________________

In the Interest of A.J.P., A Child

_______________________________

FROM THE 69 DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAM COUNTY; TH

NO. 10,854; HON. RON ENNS, PRESIDING

_______________________________

On Abatement and Remand

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Adrian Ryan Santos filed a notice of appeal evincing his desire to appeal an order

terminating his parental rights to A.J.P., a minor child. On April 7, 2009, this court received

a letter from the court reporter for the 69 judicial district advising that no request has been th

made for the preparation of the reporter’s record in the above referenced appeal. From

documents filed with this court by Santos, it appears that he is incarcerated in Colorado.

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 69 District Court of Dallam th

County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately

cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the

following:
2

1. whether Santos desires to prosecute the appeal; and,

2. whether Santos is indigent and entitled to appointed counsel and a free 

 record on appeal.

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. Should the trial court find

that Santos desires to pursue the appeal, is indigent, and entitled to appointed counsel, we

further direct it to appoint counsel to assist Santos in the prosecution of the appeal. The

name, address, phone number, telefax number, and state bar number of the counsel, if

any, who will represent Santos on appeal must also be included in the court’s findings of

fact and conclusions of law. So too shall it 1) execute findings of fact and conclusions of

law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed a supplemental clerk’s

record containing its findings of fact and conclusions of law and all orders it may issue as

a result of its hearing in this matter, and 3) cause to be developed a reporter’s record

transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the aforementioned hearing.

Additionally, the district court shall then file the supplemental record and reporter’s record

transcribing the hearing with the clerk of this court on or before May 29, 2009. Should

further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be

requested before May 29, 2009.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         486,885
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  165,282
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    120,702
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               948,562
<PP&E>                                       4,287,430
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,103,776
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,608,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,201,605
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,229,195
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,254,355)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,608,598
<SALES>                                      7,082,754
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,082,754
<CGS>                                        2,151,954
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,465,581
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,170,738
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (49,013)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,504,552)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,504,552)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,504,552)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.12)
        

</TABLE>
255 La. 233

#### The SUPERIOR OIL COMPANY v. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Inc. and The California Company.

No. 50206.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1970.

In re: The Superior Oil Company applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 226 So.2d 565.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,147
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,331
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,575
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     18,767
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,293
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,330
<LOANS>                                        148,471
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,124
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,710
<DEPOSITS>                                     143,207
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,989
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,134
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,360
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 178,710
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 11,997
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,420
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                13,417
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,935
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,982
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,435
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,604
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,586
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,586
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,884
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.64
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.90
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       280
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    280
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,145
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       21
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,124
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,124
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            239
        

</TABLE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549




FORM 10-Q/A


(Amendment No. 2)




þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





For the Quarterly period ended   June 30, 2012





o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


Commission file number 000-30178
 
 
 VIEW SYSTEMS, INC.
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
 Nevada

59-2928366(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
 1550 Caton Center Drive, Suite E, Baltimore, Maryland 21227
 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
 
 
 (410) 242-8439
 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
 
 Check whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes þ  No o
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “small reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.





Large accelerated filer      o                                                                                                            Accelerated filer                   o


Non-accelerated filer        o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)                           Smaller reporting company  þ




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)     Yes o   No þ





Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
 Class

Outstanding at August 15, 2012Common Stock, $.001 par value per share

170,421,178











Explanatory Note
  The sole purpose of this Amendment No. 2 to View Systems, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012 is to mark correctly the shell company disclosure box on the cover sheet of Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012, which we filed on August 28, 2012. The Company is not a shell company.








SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
  VIEW SYSTEMS, INC.Date: August 29, 2012
By:
/s/ Gunther ThanGunther ThanChief Executive Officer

(Principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer)