alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Sacrifices remembered at Memorial Day

/ Published May 31, 2018
TRACY, Calif., 
As the sacrifices of nation’s war dead of past and present conflicts around the world were being honored on Memorial Day, the American military must continue to be ready to respond to a number of challenges in many parts of the world.

This was told to some 300 people who attended Monday’s Memorial Day program at Tracy Cemetery by Marine Corps Col. Andre T. Harrell, commander of DLA Distribution San Joaquin.

“In today’s ever-changing geopolitical climate, we still must be ready to fight abroad,” he said. “Our military must remain formidable and lethal in order to prevent chaos, disruption and indiscriminate mass destruction of peaceful societies.”

Harrell said that restoring military readiness, strengthening alliances and reforming efforts to modernize forces “pave the way for the U.S. to remain an international presence for equality, human rights, fair trade, globalization education and economic opportunity.”

Patriotic music for the program, conducted by the Tracy American Legion and VFW posts, was provided by the Tracy Community Band. Mayor Bob Rickman read a Memorial Day proclamation.

A 21-gun salute by the combined American Legion and Veterans of Foreign Wars honor guard and the sounding of taps by trumpeter Greg Wright closed the program.

A wreath-laying ceremony followed at the Tracy War Memorial, where the names on the monument of the 57 Tracy victims of wars of the past century were read by Vietnam Army veteran Ray Morelos. A bell was wrung by George Briggs, a Navy veteran of World War II, Korea and Vietnam, to signal their deaths.
No. 00-7192.

#### Roby *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           Section 1350 Certification

         In connection  with the Annual Report of PHAZAR CORP (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company certify,  pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
           of the Company.



   /s/ Gary W. Havener
   ------------------------------
   Gary W. Havener
   Chief Executive Officer


   /s/ Clark D. Wraight
   ------------------------------
   Clark D. Wraight
   Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22441]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. RP93-206-017 and RP96-347-008]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

August 19, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 15, 1997, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), tendered for filing to become part of Northern's FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets:

Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 201
3 Substitute original Sheet No. 263D
First Revised Sheet No. 302
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 303

    Northern states that the instant filing is made in compliance with 
the Commission's Order issued July 31, 1997 in Docket Nos. RP93-206-000 
and RP96-347-000 et al., addressing the Carlton Settlement.
    Northern states that copies of the filing were served upon 
Northern's customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. All 
protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken in this proceeding, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for inspection in the 
Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22441 Filed 8-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case 4:04-cv-00382-JEJ Document 15 Filed 06/07/05 Page 1 of 1
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1269 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify certain activities 

the conduct of which does not require a permit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 20, 2005 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. BOND, Mr. 

CHAMBLISS, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. 

CRAIG, and Mr. ROBERTS) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify 

certain activities the conduct of which does not require 

a permit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pest Management and 

5 Fire Suppression Flexibility Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HARMONIZATION. 

7 Section 402(l) of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

8 Act (33 U.S.C. 1342(l)) is amended by adding at the end 

9 the following: 
2 

•S 1269 IS

1 ‘‘(3) PUBLIC HEALTH PROTECTION AND PEST

2 MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES.—The Administrator shall 

3 not require a permit under this section, nor shall the 

4 Administrator directly or indirectly require a State 

5 to require such a permit, for— 

6 ‘‘(A) the use of a pesticide that is reg7 istered or otherwise approved for use pursuant 

8 to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and 

9 Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.), if that 

10 use is in accordance with the relevant provisions 

11 of the approved labeling of the pesticide; 

12 ‘‘(B) the use of a fire retardant, chemical, 

13 or water for fire suppression, control, or preven14 tion in accordance with relevant Federal guide15 lines by or in cooperation with the Federal Gov16 ernment or a State government; 

17 ‘‘(C) silvicultural activities (except with re18 spect to the point source activities specified in 

19 section 122.27(b)(1) of title 40, Code of Fed20 eral Regulations (as in effect on the date of en21 actment of this paragraph)); or 

22 ‘‘(D)(i) the use of a biological control orga23 nism (as defined in section 403 of the Plant 

24 Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7702)) for the preven-
3 

•S 1269 IS

1 tion, control, or eradication of a plant pest or 

2 noxious weed; or 

3 ‘‘(ii) the conduct of any other plant pest, 

4 noxious weed, or pest control activity under 

5 that Act (7 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.).’’. 

6 SEC. 3. DEFINITION OF POINT SOURCE. 

7 Section 502(14) of the Federal Water Pollution Con8 trol Act (33 U.S.C. 1362(14)) is amended by striking the 

9 second sentence and inserting the following: ‘‘This term 

10 does not include agricultural stormwater discharges, re11 turn flows from irrigated agriculture, or the public health 

12 protection, pest management, and silvicultural activities 

13 described in section 402(l)(3).’’. 

Æ
EXHIBIT 32(b)



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 of Citizens Holding Company (the Company), as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Report), I, Robert T. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (3) | the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                        
|----------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 9, 2005 |  | /s/ Robert T. Smith    
|                  |  | Robert T. Smith        
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### TAX COLLECTOR OF the CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, Tax Assessor of the City of Jacksonville, and Fred O. Dickinson, Jr., as Comptroller of the State of Florida, Appellants, v. CATHEDRAL MANOR, INC., a Florida corporation, not for profit, Appellee.

No. L-179.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 2, 1970.

William L. Durden, and Yardley D. Buckman, Jacksonville, for appellants.

John D. Corse, of Ulmer, Murchison, Ashby & Ball, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
# L_2023166EN.01006201.xml

| 30.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 166/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 166/62

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/1327

of 23 June 2023

conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the name ‘Canelli’ (PDO)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Canelli’ forwarded by Italy and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Canelli’ forwarded by Italy and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Canelli’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Canelli’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Canelli’ (PDO) is hereby protected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 June 2023.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 43, 6.2.2023, p. 5.

2

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the
requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.

The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of CCF Holding Company (the issuer), hereby certifies as follows:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the issuer (the Report), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

Dated this 28th day of March, 2008.



/s/ David B. TurnerDavid B. Turner, Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
has been provided to the issuer and will be retained by the issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Gerald R. COOK, Appellee.

No. 77-1749.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 7, 1978.

Rehearing Denied May 19, 1978.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, and Robert H. Dillinger, Asst. Public Defender, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

OTT, Judge.

The state appeals from an order granting appellee’s motion to suppress evidence. After a careful review of the record and the briefs we find that we must agree with the state that there is no evidence to support the trial court’s conclusion that the im-poundment of appellee’s vehicle was unnecessary.

At the hearing on appellee’s motion to suppress, the only testimony came from Officer Paul Cooke. Officer Cooke testified that at 2:30 a. m. one morning he stopped a Ford convertible which was traveling at eighty miles per hour through the streets of St. Petersburg. When the car came to a halt, it was one foot off the road at a busy intersection. Its driver, appellee, and his two passengers all appeared to be quite intoxicated. As a result, Officer Cooke arrested appellee for driving while intoxicated, detained the two passengers under the Myers Act, Chapter 396, Florida Statutes (1975), and impounded the vehicle. Another officer conducted an inventory search of the car which produced the firearm that was the subject of the motion to suppress. Cooke testified that impoundment was, in such circumstances, normal police procedure.

After hearing the officer’s testimony and indicating that it was familiar with the intersection where the car had stopped, the court granted the motion to suppress. In so doing it ruled that the impoundment of the vehicle was unnecessary.

As we examine this case, we must first note that the trial court used the correct standard-necessity-in considering the propriety of the impoundment and the resulting inventory search. *Altman*v. *State,*
      *43335 So.2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). However, we think that, as a matter of law, there was no evidence to support the finding by the trial court of a lack of necessity.

The uncontradicted testimony of Officer Cooke demonstrated that appellee and his passengers were all far too intoxicated to drive the car or make any rational decision concerning its removal. Consequently, the officer’s only alternative would have been to leave the car where it was, but we do not believe that this was a viable alternative. Anytime an automobile is left within a foot of a highway, it is a hazard to passing traffic. This is especially so where, as here, the car is parked at a busy intersection during the hours of darkness. Therefore, Officer Cooke really had no choice but to impound appellee’s vehicle.

Because the impoundment and inventory search of the car were proper, we reverse the order granting appellee’s motion to suppress and remand this case for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and SCHEB, J., concur.
254 La. 3

#### Clayton J. GUILBEAU et al. v. JEANERETTE LUMBER & SHINGLE CO., Ltd. and Shell Oil Company.

No. 49801.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 9, 1969.

In re: Clayton J. Guilbeau et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Martin. 219 So.2d 545.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
Table 2. Toxicological Studies on HFE-347pc-f 

Toxicological Data HFE-347pc-f 

Acute Oral Toxicity 

 LD50 orl-rat 

>2,000mg/kg 

Acute Inhalation Toxicity 

 LC50 ihl-rat 4hr 

>3,010ppm 

Subacute Oral Toxicity 

 rat 28days NOAEL 

1,000mg/kg/day 

Subacute Inhalation Toxicity 

 rat 6hr/day•28days NOEL 

0.99mg/L (ca.120ppm) 

Subacute Inhalation Toxicity 

 rat 6hr/day•90days NOAEL 

1000ppm 

Gene Mutation 

 Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test 

Negative 

Chromosomal Aberration Test 

 CHL cell 

Negative 

Bioconcentration 

 LogPOW

2.18 

 Other toxicological studies are currently investigated.
**Specialty Agriculture - Vegetables and MelonsReports are indicated with the symbol Datasets are marked with the symbol 
Agricultural Chemical Usage, Vegetable Summary (NASS)Dry Beans and Peas (ERS)Fresh Vegetable Prices and Spreads (ERS)Mushroom Industry Report (ERS)Mushrooms (NASS)Onion Statistics (ERS)U.S. Cabbage Statistics (ERS)U.S. Tomato Statistics (ERS)U.S. Vegetable and Melon Farms (ERS)U.S. Vegetable and Melon Production (ERS)U.S. Watermelon Industry (ERS)Vegetable Yearbook (ERS)Vegetables (NASS)Vegetables and Specialties (ERS)Vegetables--Annual summary (NASS)Vegetables: Final Estimates (NASS)USDA Economics and Statistics System
**
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1
SUBSIDIARIES OF TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS, INC:
---------------------------------------------------

THCR Holding Corp. (Delaware corporation)
THCR/LP Corporation (Delaware corporation)
Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Holdings, L.P. (Delaware limited partnership)
Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Funding, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Atlantic City Holding, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Atlantic City Funding, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Atlantic City Funding II, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Atlantic City Funding III, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Atlantic City Associates (New Jersey general partnership)
Trump Taj Mahal Associates (New Jersey general partnership)
Trump Plaza Associates (New Jersey general partnership)
Trump Atlantic City Corporation (Delaware corporation)
THCR Enterprises, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
THCR Enterprises, L.L.C. (New Jersey limited liability company)
THCR Ventures, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Development Company, L.L.C. (Delaware limited
liability company)
Trump International Casino Ltd. (Ontario corporation)
Trump Internet Casino, L.L.C. (Delaware limited liability company)
THCR Management Holdings, LLC (Delaware limited liability company)
THCR Management Services, L.L.C. (Delaware limited liability company)
Trump Indiana, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump's Castle Hotel & Casino, Inc. (New Jersey corporation)
Trump's Castle Funding, Inc. (New Jersey corporation)
Trump's Castle Associates, L.P. (New jersey limited partnership)

SUBSIDIARIES OF TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS HOLDINGS, L.P.
------------------------------------------------------------

Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Funding, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Atlantic City Holding, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Atlantic City Funding, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Atlantic City Funding II, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Atlantic City Funding III, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Atlantic City Associates (New Jersey general partnership)
Trump Taj Mahal Associates (New Jersey general partnership)
Trump Plaza Associates (New Jersey general partnership)
Trump Atlantic City Corporation (Delaware corporation)
THCR Enterprises, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
THCR Enterprises, L.L.C. (New Jersey limited liability company)
THCR Ventures, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts Development Company, L.L.C. (Delaware limited
liability company)
Trump International Casino Ltd. (Ontario corporation)
Trump Internet Casino, L.L.C. (Delaware limited liability company)
THCR Management Holdings, LLC (Delaware limited liability company)
THCR Management Services, L.L.C. (Delaware limited liability company)
Trump Indiana, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
Trump's Castle Hotel & Casino, Inc. (New Jersey corporation)
Trump's Castle Funding, Inc. (New Jersey corporation)
Trump's Castle Associates, L.P. (New jersey limited partnership)

SUBSIDIARIES OF TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS FUNDING, INC.:
------------------------------------------------------------
None
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Christopher McALLISTER.

No. 60530.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 30, 1977.

In re: Christopher A. McAllister applying for supervisory writs.

Writ denied in part, granted in part: As to Assignment No. 2 (relating to motion to quash); denied — adequate remedy by appeal in the event of conviction. However, Assignment No. 1 (relating to motion to set bond) has merit. Trial judge is ordered to fix bail in accordance with law.

SUMMERS, J.,

dissents from the reversal of the ruling of the trial judge denying bail in this case involving a charge of first degree murder.
Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Jagged Peak, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 10, 2006
|                      | 
|By:                   |  | /s/ Paul B. Demirdjian 
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### M. R. I., INC., a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 69-411.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Dec. 12, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
1The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-1491

___________

Wanda Bucklinger; Frank Bucklinger, *

 *

Appellees, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Western District of Missouri. 

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: October 27, 1999

 Filed: October 29, 1999

___________

Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, BOWMAN and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. 

___________

PER CURIAM.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. appeals the District Court’s1 order denying its motion for

a new trial in this diversity slip-and-fall action. Having reviewed the record and the

parties’ briefs, we affirm for the reasons stated by the District Court. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.