alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 168 (Friday, August 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23082]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[NM-930-1310-01); (NMNM 89026)]


New Mexico: Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas 
Lease

    Under the provisions of Public Law 97-451, a petition for 
reinstatement of oil and gas lease NMNM 89026 for lands in San Juan 
County, New Mexico, was timely filed and was accompanied by all 
required rentals and royalties accruing from June 1, 1997, the date of 
termination.
    No valid lease has been issued affecting the lands. The lessee has 
agreed to new lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 
per acre or fraction thereof and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The 
lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and has reimbursed 
the Bureau of Land Management for the cost of this Federal Register 
notice.
    The Lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the 
lease as set out in Sections 31 (d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act 
of 1920 (30 USC 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to 
reinstate the lease effective June 1, 1997, subject to the original 
terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty 
rates cited above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lourdes B. Ortiz, Bureau of Land 
Management, New Mexico State Office, (505) 438-7586.

    Dated: August 22, 1997.
Lourdes B. Ortiz,
Land Law Examiner.
[FR Doc. 97-23082 Filed 8-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
**Agricultural Productivity in the U.S. (98003)**
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 168 (Friday, August 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23111]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 97-127]


National Environmental Policy Act; Notice of Cassini Mission 
Record Decision

    In furtherance of the Council on Environmental Quality regulation 
at 40 CFR 1505.2 and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
(NASA) regulation at 14 CFR 1216.311, public notice is hereby provided 
that on August 12, 1997, a Record of Decision (ROD) was rendered 
pertaining to the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) 
for the Cassini Mission to Saturn. While the ROD completes the National 
Environmental Policy Act process, the ``Go/No-Go'' decision for launch 
of the Cassini spacecraft will not be made until all of the mission and 
flight readiness reviews are completed.
    By way of background, in July 1995, NASA issued a Final 
Environmental Impact Statement, dated June 1995. In April 1997, the 
Draft SEIS was made available to the public. NASA responded to the 
comments on the Draft SEIS and issued the Final SEIS on June 27, 1997, 
with publication of the notice of availability of the Final SEIS on 
July 3, 1997. The prescribed 30-day waiting period ended on August 4, 
1997. Five comment letters (1 Federal agency, 4 individuals) were 
received on the Final SEIS. The comments were evaluated and determined 
not to present significant new information or data relevant to 
environmental concerns and bearing on the proposed action or its 
environmental impacts.
    After consideration of all of the information, as updated in the 
final SEIS, the alternatives evaluated, public comments received, and 
other technical and programmatic factors, the decision (documented in 
the ROD) is the selection of the preferred alternative. This 
alternative consists of completing preparations for the Cassini Mission 
to Saturn, launching the spacecraft on a Titan IV (SRMU)/Centaur from 
the U.S. Air Force Cape Canaveral Air Station, Florida, and operating 
the mission. The launch is planned to take place during the primary 
launch opportunity beginning in early October 1997, with a secondary 
opportunity beginning in late November 1997 and a backup opportunity 
beginning in March 1999.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Mark R. Dahl, NASA Headquarters, Code SD, Washington, DC 20546-
0001; telephone 202-358-1544.
Benita A. Cooper,
Associate Administrator for Management Systems and Facilities.
[FR Doc. 97-23111 Filed 8-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 172 Referred in House (RFH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 172

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 6, 2005

            Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to provide for the 
  regulation of all contact lenses as medical devices, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REGULATION OF CERTAIN ARTICLES AS MEDICAL DEVICES.

    Section 520 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
360j) is amended by adding at the end the following subsection:

                ``Regulation of Contact Lens as Devices

    ``(n)(1) All contact lenses shall be deemed to be devices under 
section 201(h).
    ``(2) Paragraph (1) shall not be construed as bearing on or being 
relevant to the question of whether any product other than a contact 
lens is a device as defined by section 201(h) or a drug as defined by 
section 201(g).''.

            Passed the Senate July 29, 2005.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1830 Prepped byOllie Stewart

Document

Number: 

# 216)IV-C-18 3 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:21:03 AM Sheet 216 of 232\ UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENC Y PJ L 

# iv-c - 

# /?J

* . 

### OCT

### 2 9 AN N ARBOR
. MICHIGA N 4810 5 

# X OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N
Mr . Mar c Dagess e Directo r o f Gasolin e Operation s Dair yMar t Convenienc e Stores , Inc . 2 4 0 Sout hRoa d Enfield , C T 0608 2 Dea r Mr . Dagesse : Thi s i s i nrespons e t o you r Septembe r 20 , 199 1 lette r t o Senato r Christophe r Dod d regardin g onboar d refuelin g vapo r controls , a cop yo f whic hyo u sen t t o th e EPA . W e appreciat e you r interes t i nthi s rulemaking . EP Ai s proceedin g wit hth e rulemakin g proces s fo r onboar d control s a s require d byth e Clea n Ai r Ac t Amendment s o f 1990 . A s par t o f thi s process , Congres s directe d th e EP At o consul t wit hth e Departmen t o f Transportatio n(DOT ) regardin g onboar d syste msafety . Thi s consultatio ni s wel l underway . Th e Nationa l Highwa yTraffi c Safet yAdministratio n (NHTSA ) , whic hi s par t o f th e DOT , ha s recentl yrelease d a studyo f onboar d syste msafety . W e ar e reviewin g thi s studyan d hav e place d a cop yi nth e publi c docke t fo r thi s rulemaking . W e als o hel d a publi c hearin g o nSeptembe r 26t han d 27t hi norde r t o solici t comment s fro mth e publi c o nthi s issue . Writte ncomment s ar e bein g accepte d unti l Octobe r 27th . W e wil l mak e th e fina l determinatio no nho wt o procee d wit hth e rul e base d o nDOT' S conclusion s regardin g safet yrisk s o f onboar d system s an d o nth e recor d develope d durin g th e commen t period . Than k yo u agai nfo r you r letter . I t wil l b e include d i n th e publi c docket . Pleas e fee l fre e t o contac t m e i f yo u requir e any additiona l information . Sincerel yyours , Charle s L . Directo r / Emissio nContro l Technolog yDivisio n
cc : Publi c Docke t A-87-1 1
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                       Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

         Connecticut                 000-24751                   06-1514263
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction        (Commission                (IRS Employer
     of incorporation)              File Number)             Identification No.)

5 Bissell Street, Lakeville, Connecticut                         06039-1868
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                         (zip code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (860) 435-9801
                                                     --------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)


Check the  appropriate  box below if the Form 8-K is intended to  simultaneously
satisfy the filing  obligations  of the  registrant  under any of the  following
provisions (see General Instructions A.2. below):

[_]   Written  communications  pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (12
      C.F.R. 230.425)

[_]   Soliciting  material  pursuant  to Rule 14a-2 under the  Exchange  Act (17
      C.F.R. 240.14a-12)

[_]   Pre-commencement  communications  pursuant  to  Rule  14d-2(b)  under  the
      Exchange Act (17 C.F.R. 240.14d-2(b))

[_]   Pre-commencement  communications  pursuant  to  Rule  13e-4(c)  under  the
      Exchange Act (17 C.F.R. 240.13e-4(c))

<PAGE>


Form 8-K, Current Report

Salisbury Bancorp, Inc.

Section 2.     Financial Information

Item 2.02.     Results of Operations and Financial Condition
------------------------------------------------------------

         On April 28, 2008, Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") issued a
press release announcing its financial results for the quarter ended March 31,
2008. The press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein
by reference.

Section 9.     Financial Statements and Exhibits

Item 9.01.     Financial Statements and Exhibits
------------------------------------------------

               (c)      Exhibits
                        99.1 Press Release dated April 28, 2008.

                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereto duly authorized.


Dated: April 28, 2008                SALISBURY BANCORP, INC.


                                     By:        /s/ John F. Foley
                                         -------------------------------
                                         John F. Foley
                                         Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2573

CHARLES L. FREEZE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Substituted for defendant, Dr. Donald Durham Volkmer; DONALD DURHAM VOLKMER, DR., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-596-1) Submitted: May 19, 2005 Decided: May 24, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles L. Freeze, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne P. Klauer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Charles L. Freeze appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Freeze v. United States , No. CA-03-596-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 2004; Dec. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
FREDERICK M. JONES

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 76

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 18, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Terry P. Lewis , Judge

.

Melissa J. Ford, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Region One, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General; Virginia Harris and Kaitlin Weiss, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee , fo r Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF

, ROWE

, and KELSEY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
```

[106th Congress Private Law 19]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:pvtl019.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 3117]]

Private Law 106-19
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 For the relief of Mrs. Elizabeth Eka Bassey, Emmanuel O. Paul Bassey, 
  and Mary Idongesit Paul Bassey. <<NOTE: Nov. 22, 2000 -  [S. 1078]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Mrs. Elizabeth 
Eka Bassey, Emmanuel O. Paul Bassey, and Mary Idongesit Paul Bassey 
shall be held and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the 
United States for permanent residence as of the date of the enactment of 
this Act upon payment of the required visa fees.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Mrs. Elizabeth Eka 
Bassey, Emmanuel O. Paul Bassey, and Mary Idongesit Paul Bassey, as 
provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 
officer to reduce by the appropriate number during the current fiscal 
year the total number of immigrant visas available to natives of the 
country of the aliens' birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).

    Approved November 22, 2000.
```
----

**Exhibit      32.2**

**Certification      of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley      Act of 2002**

**(i)**
**(ii)**

|                                   | **WESTSTAR                FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION** |   |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   |                                                       |   |   |   |
|                                   |                                                       |   |   |   |
| Date:                November 13, 2007 |                                                       | By:    | /s/                Randall C. Hall |   |
|                                   |                                                       |   |   |   |
|                                   |                                                       |   | Randall                C. Hall |   |
|                                   |                                                       |   | Executive                Vice President and Chief Financial |   |
|                                   |                                                       |   | and                Principal Accounting Officer |   |

----
NUMBER 13-20-00362-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE JASMINE B. CUELLAR

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and

Relator’s Emergency Motion for Temporary Relief

ORDER

Before Justices Hinojosa, Perkes, and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

Relator Jasmine B. Cuellar filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for 

emergency relief in the above cause on August 19, 2020. Relator contends that the 

Honorable Elia Cornejo Lopez, presiding judge of the 404th Judicial District Court of 

Cameron County, Texas, abused her discretion, leaving relator without an adequate 

appellate remedy, by granting the real party in interest, Adam T. Garcia, Jr.’s request for 

temporary orders pending the trial court’s final ruling on his petition to modify the parent 

child relationship.
2

Through this original proceeding, relator seeks to vacate the trial court’s August 

10, 2020, temporary order which prevents relator from relocating her children from 

Cameron County, Texas to Harris County, Texas where relator currently resides, and 

provides relator a deadline of thirty days to reestablish her residence in Cameron County 

in order to maintain her right to designate the children’s primary residence. Through her

motion for emergency relief, relator seeks a stay of the trial court’s temporary order until 

such time as we may fully consider the petition for writ of mandamus.

The Court previously ordered that the real party in interest, Adam T. Garcia, Jr., or 

any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response 

to relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief on or before 

August 27, 2020. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. After the response deadline 

expired, Garcia filed a notice with this Court indicating that he will not be filing a response 

to the petition for writ of mandamus or the motion for emergency relief.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion for emergency relief

is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The motion for emergency relief is 

GRANTED and the trial court’s August 10, 2020 temporary order is ordered STAYED 

pending further order of this Court, or until the case is finally decided. See id. R. 52.10(b) 

(“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the case 

is finally decided.”). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

1st day of September, 2020.
No. 9413.

#### Schatzinger *v.*The Darlington Brick & Mining Co. et al.

(Decided March 6, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Mr. Paul G. Kassulker,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Weed, Miller .& Nason*and *Messrs. Carpenter, Young é Stocker,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
**USSR Trade Compendium (88023)**
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-02-395-CR

STANLEY KENT MOORE	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Stanley Kent Moore was convicted of driving while intoxicated.  [CR 363]  He pled nolo contendere and, pursuant to a plea agreement, was sentenced to six months’ confinement in the Tarrant County Jail.  [CR 363]

	Appellant was represented by counsel at trial, first by appointed counsel, then by retained counsel. [CR 350]Ll.  The trial court sentenced Appellant on September 4, 2002, and Appellant filed his pro se notice of appeal on October 3, 2002. [cr 363, 375a] On March 10, 2003, we granted retained counsel’s motion to withdraw, notifying Appellant that he had the right to retain appellate counsel or proceed pro se.  [See corr. folder]  Appellant did not notify us whether he desired to proceed.  [Id.] The record does not reflect that Appellant is indigent.  No record or briefs have been filed.

	Because no brief was filed on Appellant’s behalf within the time prescribed, we abated the appeal for the trial court to determine if Appellant desired to prosecute his appeal, if he was indigent, if he required appointed counsel, or if retained counsel had failed to pursue the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2).  The trial court held two abatement hearings.  On June 17, 2003, the trial court sent Appellant notice of the July 2, 2003 hearing to his last known physical address.   [RR1 4] Appellant did not respond to the notice or appear at the hearing.  [RR1 4]  The trial court reset the hearing to July 9, 2003, and sent the notice to Appellant again, this time to another known address of Appellant.  [RR2 4]  Appellant did not appear at the hearing.  [RR1 4]   The trial court found that the Appellant had sufficient notice of the hearings and that the district clerk had made every attempt to notify Appellant of the trial settings, [RR2 5] and sent the cause back to this court for further action. [RR2 5] 

	We notified the parties that we would consider the appeal without briefs.  Appellant did not respond.  The records of this court show that the Appellant has made no attempt to pursue his appeal.  We therefore submitted the case without the benefit of briefs and, in the interest of justice, reviewed the entire record.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(4).  Having found no unassigned fundamental error, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.  See Lott v. State, 874 S.W.2d 687, 688 (Tex. Crim. App.—Fort Worth 1994, no pet.).  								

									PER CURIAM

PANEL DF:	HOLMAN, dayDAYGARDNER, and WALKERLIVINGSTON, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: August 7MONTH DAY, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                        336,458
<SECURITIES>                                   29,460
<RECEIVABLES>                                 102,485
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              524,740
<PP&E>                                        441,660
<DEPRECIATION>                                407,128
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                802,872
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         828,951
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                    15,400
<COMMON>                                      176,429
<OTHER-SE>                                   (217,908)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  802,872
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              395,213
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 929,196
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (270,362)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (270,362)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (270,362)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   ($.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   ($.02)
                                            






</TABLE>