alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2


            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, John W. Peters, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Suncrest Global
Energy Corp.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

       (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

                                  /s/ John W. Peters
Date: November 11, 2004          ___________________________________________
                                 John W. Peters, Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit
23.1

Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have issued our report
dated March 24, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial statements
included in the Annual Report of Image Sensing Systems, Inc. on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2010. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Image Sensing
Systems, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-162810, effective November 18, 2009;
File No. 333-41706, effective July 19, 2000) and on Forms S-8 (File No.
333-167496, effective June 14, 2010; File No. 333-165303, effective March 8,
2010; File No. 333-152117, effective July 3, 2008; File No. 333-142449,
effective April 30, 2007; File No. 333-82546, effective February 11, 2002; File
No. 333-86169, effective August 30, 1999; and File No. 333-09289, effective
July 31, 1996).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 24, 2011

50

---
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of License Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  August 12, 2003
254 La. 643

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph DIMITRI.

No. 50044.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 1969.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writ of certiorari.

Writ refused. On the showing made, the result is correct.

.BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trenwick Group Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan L. Hunte,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


Date: August 20, 2003                                          /s/ Alan L. Hunte
                                                               -----------------
                                                                   Alan L. Hunte
                                                    Executive Vice President and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Trenwick Group Ltd. and will be retained by Trenwick Group Ltd. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       50
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 171 (Thursday, September 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23405]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 8321-006]


Murray W. Thurston, Inc.; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

August 28, 1997.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission's) 
regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order 486, 52 F.R. 47897), the 
Commission's Office of Hydropower Licensing has reviewed an exemption 
surrender application for the Thurston Mill Project No. 8321-006. The 
Thurston Mill Project is located on the Swift River in Oxford County, 
Maine. The EA finds that approving the application would not constitute 
a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human 
environment.
    Copies of the EA are available for review in the Commission's 
Reference and Information Center, Room 2A, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426. For further information, please contact the 
project manager, Ms. Hillary Berlin, at (202) 219-0038.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23405 Filed 9-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         25,071,000
<SECURITIES>                                   47,069,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  73,948,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,995,000
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               244,666,000
<PP&E>                                         43,451,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 11,062,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 385,910,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          233,251,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       349,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,466,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   385,910,000
<SALES>                                        226,620,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               233,968,000
<CGS>                                          135,469,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  311,210,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                77,242,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   27,801,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            49,441,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   49,441,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.73
        


</TABLE>
No. 00-7235.

#### Jones *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
March  20, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549

Re:  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K  for the year  ended  December  31,  2001 for
     American Insured Mortgage Investors


Ladies and Gentlemen:

Consistent with the  Commission's  release of March 18, 2002,  please be advised
that the  Partnership  has  obtained a letter  from  Arthur  Andersen  LLP,  the
Partnership's  independent public accountants,  dated March 20, 2002, containing
the   following   representations   regarding   the  audits   performed  on  the
Partnership's  balance  sheets as of December  31, 2001 and 2000 and the related
statements of income and comprehensive  income,  changes in partners' equity and
cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999:



o    the audits were subject to Arthur Andersen's quality control system for the
     U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable  assurance that
     the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards;
o    there was appropriate  continuity of Arthur Andersen  personnel  working on
     the audits; and
o    there was appropriate availability of national office consultation.

Representation  relating to the availability of personnel at foreign  affiliates
of Arthur Andersen was not relevant to these audits.

                                                     AMERICAN INSURED MORTGAGE
                                                     INVESTORS (Registrant)

                                                     By: CRIIMI, Inc.
                                                         General Partner


                                                     /s/ William B. Dockser
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     William B. Dockser
                                                     Chairman of the Board
#### Maureen JOSEPH et al., Appellants, v. JEFFERSON STORES, a foreign corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 69-345.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 18, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 8, 1969.

*104Fuller & Brumer, Bolles, Goodwin, Rys-kamp & Ware, Miami, for appellant.

Stephens, Demos, Magill & Thornton, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

BARKDULL, Judge.

Appellants were plaintiffs in the trial court and recovered $5,000.00 compensatory damages and $10,000.00 punitive damages in a false imprisonment suit.

Upon a motion for new trial, the trial judge ordered a new trial unless the plaintiffs remitted $7,500.00 of the punitive damages award. The plaintiffs refused to remit, and this appeal ensued. The appellants contend the trial court erred in ordering a remittitur. Appellees cross-assign error on the failure of the trial judge to direct a verdict and in submitting the issue of punitive damages to the jury. We reverse.

 The trial court having found that the plaintiffs were entitled to go to the jury on the issue of punitive damages, he exceeded his authority in reducing the punitive damages award in view of the amount of the compensatory damages awarded and the substantial wealth of the defendant, Jefferson Stores, as reflected in the record. The amount awarded was certainly not excessive. Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. Archer, 126 Fla. 308, 171 So.2d 214; Miami Beach Lerner Shops v. Walco Mfg. of Florida, Inc., Fla.App.1958, 106 So.2d 233; Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Morgan, Fla.App.1968, 213 So.2d 632; 9 Fla.Jur., Damages, §§ 115, 116. In light of what is said above, we find no merit in the appellees’ cross-assignment directed to submitting this issue to the jury.

The appellees’ cross-assignment as to the ruling on the motion for directed verdict is also found to he without merit. It is clear from the record and all reasonable inferences therefrom that the agents and employees of the defendant, Jefferson Stores, restrained the appellant, Maureen Joseph, and her two minor children some two and one-half hours in an attempt to coerce her into signing a statement which, among other things, required her to admit:

> “ * * * I took from the possession of JEFFERSON STORES, INC., at the store of said JEFFERSON STORES, INC., in the city of_, without making payment therefor and with intent to take for my own use or disposition, certain articles of personal property, of which JEFFERSON STORES, INC., is the owner, * * *”

> * * * * * *

There is no doubt that the actions of the defendant, Jefferson Stores, [through its employees] were unwarranted under the circumstances of the case sub judice. Jefferson Stores, Inc. v. Caudell, Fla.App. 1969, 228 So.2d 99 (opinion filed simultaneously herewith).

Therefore, for the reasons above stated, the order granting a new trial conditioned upon the remittitur is reversed, with directions to deny the motion for new trial and permit the final judgment on the verdict in the amount of $15,000.00 to stand.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.
EXHIBIT32.1





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONOF


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER





In connection with thequarterlyreport ofGlobal Food Technologies,
Inc.("Company") on Form
10-Qfor thequarterendedSeptember 30, 2010,as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("Report"), theundersigned, in the capacities and on
the dates indicated below, hereby certifypursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Section1350) that to their
knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of theCompany.





Dated November 15,
2010




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Global Food Technologies, Inc. will be
retained by Global Food Technologies, inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Keith
    MeeksKeith Meeks, President and Chief
      Executive Officer/s/
      Marshall F SparksMarshall F. Sparks, Chief
      Financial
Officer
# EUR-Lex - 41998D0035 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 41998D0035

**The Schengen acquis - Decision of the Executive Committee of 16 September 1998 on forwarding the Common Manual to EU applicant States (SCH/Com-ex (98) 35, rev. 2) **

*
Official Journal L 239 , 22/09/2000 P. 0202 - 0202 *

DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

of 16 September 1998

on forwarding the Common Manual to EU applicant States

(SCH/Com-ex (98)35 rev. 2)

THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE,

Having regard to Article 132 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement,

Whereas the Schengen acquis is to be integrated into the framework of the European Union pursuant to the relevant Protocol to the Amsterdam Treaty;

Whereas pursuant to Article 8 of the said Protocol, the Schengen acquis must be accepted in full by all applicant States and whereas the latter must be adequately prepared to that end;

Whereas the Common Manual on Checks at the External Borders, in particular, is an important component of the Schengen acquis and the States with which specific accession negotiations are being conducted must be informed thereof now so that they may prepare to accept the acquis;

Whereas, to that end, the Common Manual on Checks at the External Borders, with the exception of certain annexes, and other documents should be forwarded to the States, despite the fact that they are confidential documents;

Whereas the forwarding of public decisions and declarations of the Executive Committee may also be necessary,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The Presidency-in-office may forward the Common Manual on Checks at the External Borders, without Annexes 6b, 6c and 14b, to the applicant States with which specific negotiations on their accession to the European Union are being conducted.

2. The Central Group is empowered to decide on a case-by-case basis on forwarding other confidential documents to those States.

3. Upon forwarding as referred to in points 1 and 2, it must be pointed out that this document is confidential. The State receiving the Common Manual on Checks at the External Borders or any other confidential document must undertake to treat such document as confidential.

4. Moreover, the Presidency-in-office may forward public decisions and declarations of the Executive Committee and other non-confidential documents to States and other services for internal use where a warranted interest is demonstrated.

Königswinter, 16 September 1998.

The Chairman

M. Kanther
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Flanigan's  Enterprises,  Inc., (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,  2007,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission of the date hereof (the "Quarterly  Report"),
I, Jeffrey D. Kastner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   This  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the  Company,  to which this
            certification  is attached as an Exhibit,  fully  complies  with the
            requirements  of section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
            Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information  contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents,
            in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition and results of
            operations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2007          /s/ Jeffrey D. Kastner
                               ----------------------
                               Jeffrey D. Kastner, Chief Financial Officer and
                               Secretary
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-11143

Summary Calendar

 

DAVID E. LEWIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

FORT WORTH POLICE DEP’T, ET AL.,

 Defendants,

B.E. LADD, I.D. 2508;

R.D. ABBOTT, I.D. 1995,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:94-CV-655-A

- - - - - - - - - -

October 25, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

David Earl Lewis appeals the district court’s judgment in

favor of the defendants following a bench trial on Lewis’ civil

rights complaint, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Lewis argues that he was

denied a jury trial. However, Lewis did not make a valid jury
No. 95-11143

- 2 -

demand. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 38(b).

Lewis also argues that the district court’s denial of Lewis’

pro se motion to substitute John E. Sherman as counsel,

conditioned on a continuance, effectively denied Lewis assistance

of counsel. The district court denied Lewis’ motion to

substitute counsel because it found the continuance-condition

unacceptable. The district court did not abuse its discretion by

denying the motion to substitute without prejudice to the

attorney making an entry of appearance.

AFFIRMED.
# L_2014093EN.01008502.xml

| 28.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 93/85 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 93/85

---

Corrigendum to Regulation No 72 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor cycle headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing beam and a driving beam and equipped with halogen lamps (HS1 lamps)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 75 of 14 March 2014
  )

On page 8, point 8.1:

for:

‘

  Image 1

  ’,

read:

‘

  Formula

  ’,

for:

‘

  Image 2

  ’,

read:

‘

  Formula

  ’.

---
# L_2009070DE.01002001.xml

| 14.3.2009 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 70/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2009

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 70/20

---

Berichtigung der Regelung Nr. 85 der Wirtschaftskommission der Vereinten Nationen für Europa (UN/ECE) — Einheitliche Bedingungen für die Genehmigung von Verbrennungsmotoren oder elektrischen Antriebssystemen für den Antrieb von Kraftfahrzeugen der Klassen M und N hinsichtlich der Messung der Nutzleistung und der höchsten 30-Minuten-Leistung elektrischer Antriebssysteme

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 326 vom 24. November 2006
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 326 vom 24. November 2006

Seite 74, in 5.4.1:

anstatt:

„Der Korrekturfaktor αa berechnet sich nach folgender Formel:

Formula (2)“

muss es heißen:

„Der Korrekturfaktor αa berechnet sich nach folgender Formel:

Formula (2)“

---