alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  |
|--|

FDA Home Page |CFSAN Home | Search/Subject Index |Q & A | Help

May 19, 2006

# Power Outages -Key Tips for Consumers About Food Safety 

***Community flyer:**This reproducible can be printed on one 8 1/2 x 11" page.You may choose to photocopy this flyeron one side and theKey Tips forHurricanes and Floods on the reverse for easydistribution.*

#### BePrepared:

      - Have a refrigerator thermometer.
      - Know where you can get dry ice.
      - Keep on hand a few days worth ofready-to-eat foods that do not require cooking or cooling, which depend onelectricity.

#### Whenthe Power Goes Out:

      - Keep the refrigerator and freezer doorsclosed as much as possible.
      - The refrigerator will keep food coldfor about 4 hours if it is unopened.
      - Refrigerators should be kept at 40° For below for proper food storage.

#### Oncethe Power is Restored:

      - Check the temperature inside of your refrigeratorand freezer.
      - If an appliance thermometer was kept inthe freezer, check the temperature when the power comes back on. If the freezerthermometer reads 40° F or below, the food is safe and may be refrozen. 
      - If a thermometer has not been kept inthe freezer, check each package of food to determine its safety. You can't relyon appearance or odor. If the food still contains ice crystals or is 40° For below, it is safe to refreeze or cook. 
      - Refrigerated food should be safe aslong as the power was out for no more than 4 hours. Keep the door closed asmuch as possible. 
      - Discard any perishable food (such asmeat, poultry, fish, eggs or leftovers) that has been above 40° F for twohours or more. 

----

For more information see: www.FoodSafety.gov -Consumer Advice: Disaster Assistance

For more hurricane assistance, seeHealth and Safety Before and After a Storm (FDA) andDisasters &Emergencies: Hurricanes (HHS).

Hurricane, Power Outages, & Floods

CFSAN HomeCFSAN Search/Subject IndexCFSAN Disclaimers & Privacy PolicyCFSAN Accessibility/HelpFDA Home PageSearch FDA SiteFDA A-Z IndexContact FDA
FDA/Center for Food Safety & Applied NutritionHypertext updated by ear/cjm August 30, 2006
# EUR-Lex - 51997IP1066 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 51997IP1066

**Resolution on the human rights situation in Djibouti **

*
Official Journal C 014 , 19/01/1998 P. 0207 *

B4-1066 and 1087/97

Resolution on the human rights situation in Djibouti

The European Parliament,

A. alarmed at the human rights situation in Djibouti, and particularly disturbed at the violence perpetrated against members of the opposition on the eve of the legislative elections scheduled for 19 December 1997,

B. recalling that on 26 September 1997 the leading figures of the Afar opposition, including Mr Mohamed Kadamy, the representative in Europe of the FRUD (Front for the Restoration of Unity in Djibouti), as well as a number of his co-workers and members of their families, were arrested in Ethiopia and extradited to Djibouti, where they are now being held in jail,

C. particularly concerned at the situation of Mrs Aïcha Dabalé, the wife of Mr Mohamed Kadamy and a member of a humanitarian organization, who was pregnant at the moment of her arrest,

D. recalling that the parliamentary immunity of three MPs from the ruling party was lifted in 1996 on the grounds that they had expressed public criticism of the policies of the President of Djibouti, Hassan Gouled Aptidon, and deploring the fact that, after a trial marked by irregularities, they were sentenced to six months in prison and five years' deprivation of civil rights,

E. drawing attention to the existence of large numbers of refugees and displaced persons, who are still unable to return to their home regions,

F. whereas Djibouti is a signatory to the Lomé Convention, Article 5 of which states that development aid is conditional on respect for and the enjoyment of fundamental human rights and freedoms,

The European Parliament,

1. Calls on the authorities of Djibouti to ensure full respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, especially freedom of expression and the right to a fair trial respecting the rights of the defendant;

2. Condemns the arrest of the members of the FRUD and their families, and calls for their immediate and unconditional release;

3. Calls on the authorities of Djibouti to ensure that the legislative elections of 19 December 1997 take place in a context of freedom and democracy;

4. Calls on the government of Djibouti and the governments of the countries of the region to make every effort to facilitate the return of those who have left their homes or fled as refugees to the neighbouring countries, and, in particular, to rehabilitate or hand back their houses, many of which are being occupied by the government forces;

5. Calls on the Commission and the Council to ensure respect for Article 5 of the Lomé Convention and to keep a close watch on the human rights situation in Djibouti;

6. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the co-presidents of the ACP-EU Joint Assembly and the governments of Djibouti, Ethiopia and Eritrea.
# Marines test system to expand fuel capabilities

/ Published Dec. 14, 2018
JOINT BASE CHARLESTON, S.C., *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Joint Base Charleston website.*
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1752 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1752

To amend the United States Grain Standards Act to reauthorize that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 22, 2005

  Mr. Chambliss (for himself and Mr. Harkin) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the United States Grain Standards Act to reauthorize that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF ACT.

    (a) In General.--Sections 7(j)(4), 7A(l)(3), 7D, 19, and 21(e) of 
the United States Grains Standards Act (7 U.S.C. 79(j)(4), 79a(l)(3), 
79d, 87h, 87j(e)) are amended by striking ``2005'' each place it 
appears and inserting ``2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) take 
effect on September 30, 2005.
                                 <all>
```
White 

~PTExA~ 

Arm-rnru YI. .rExuAH 

May 28, 1959 

Commissioner of Agriculture 

Capitol Station 

Austin, Texas 

Opinion No. W-634 

Re: Whether Article 666 

controls the purchase 

of office equipment by 

the'Texas Department 

of Agriculture from 

the~Insurance LiquldaDear Mr. White: to??. 

This office is In receipt of your recent letter 

in which you have stated in part, as follows: 

"This Department has purchased fortyfour (44) pieices of equipment from the 

Insurance Liquidators, C.H. Langdeau, receiver for Franklin American Insurance 

Compan 

f$' 

the total amount of purchase 

being 131.25. Before purchasing, this 

was cleared with the State Board of Control and proper purchase vouchers were 

approved and transmitted to the Comptroller Department from which they were returned to us with a refusal of approval 

for payment. The argument in question 

is whether or not we are purchasing this 

equipment from the Insurance Commission 

or from the Franklin American Insurance 

Company." 

Article 666, Vernon's Civil Statutes, provides 

for the method of disposal (by sale or transfer to 

another State agency) of surplus or salvage property 

belonging to the State of Texas. 

Article 21.28, Insurance Code, Vernon's Civil 

Statutes, establishing the office of State Insurance 

Liquidator, prescribes the method of appointment and 
Honorable John White, page 2 (W-634) 

the duties and responsibilities of the office. The statute provides that he shal! be appointed the receiver of 

any insurance company domiciled in the State of Texas 

against whom delinquency proceedings have been brought. 

The property In question Is personal property of 

the Franklin American Insurance Company which is in receivership. By order of the Court, the receiver obtains 

possession and title to the property as trustee for the 

benefit of the creditors and stockholders of the insurance company involved. Neither the Court, the Board of 

Insurance Commissioners, the Insurance Liquidator nor 

the State of'Texas acquires any proprietary interest in 

the property. 

Therefore, it is the opinion of this office that 

Article 666 has no application to the purchase of the 

property in question by the Department of Agriculture. 

SUMMARY 

Article 666 has no application 

to a purchase of property by 

the Texas Agriculture Commission 

from the State Insurance Liquldator. 

Very truly yours, 

WILL WILSON 

Attorney General of Texas 

JLE:rm 

APPROVED: 

OPINION 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

Geo. P. Blackburn, Chairman 

Elmer McVey 

Leonard Passmore 

Joe Allen Osborn 

REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

BY: W. V.Geppert
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATE OF THE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
FNBH BANCORP, INC. Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350): I, Herbert W. Bursch, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of FNBH Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  a)
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial
reporting. Date: March 16, 2005 /s/ Herbert W. BurschHerbert W. BurschChief Executive Officer
#### Dorothy MORRELL, Sidney H. Reiss and Sylvia Reiss, his wife, and Edward L. Farrar, Jr., Appellants, v. CITY OF ORLANDO, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Florida; and Carl T. Langford, Bill C. Ankney, J. Douglas Barnes, Donald L. Crenshaw and W. M. Sanderlin, City Commissioners, Appellees.

No. 69-58.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Feb. 6, 1970.

David Gluckman, of Bornstein & Petree, Orlando, for appellants.

Joseph X. DuMond, Jr., Orlando, for ap-pellees.

*16PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of County of Brevard v. Woodham, Fla.App.1969, 223 So.2d 344 (cert. den., Supreme Court opinion filed September 29, 1969) and cases therein cited.

CROSS, C. J., and WALDEN and REED, JJ., concur.
Case 4:04-cr-00300-JEJ Document 46 Filed 01/25/06 Page 1 of 6
Case 4:04-cr-00300-JEJ Document 46 Filed 01/25/06 Page 2 of 6
Case 4:04-cr-00300-JEJ Document 46 Filed 01/25/06 Page 3 of 6
Case 4:04-cr-00300-JEJ Document 46 Filed 01/25/06 Page 4 of 6
Case 4:04-cr-00300-JEJ Document 46 Filed 01/25/06 Page 5 of 6
Case 4:04-cr-00300-JEJ Document 46 Filed 01/25/06 Page 6 of 6
Served: December 3, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

NOTICE

Japan Charter Authorizations

(January 1 – December 31, 2015)

Under the terms of the 2010 U.S.-Japan Memorandum of Understanding (2010 MOU), U.S. 

carriers may operate an unlimited number of one-way charter flights (hereinafter we refer to 

“one-way charters” simply as “charters”) between the United States and Japan during the 

2015 calendar year (January 1-December 31, 2015), subject to the limitation that no more 

than six hundred (600) charters may operate to or from Tokyo’s Haneda Airport. As a result 

of the 2010 MOU, U.S. carriers now only require a Notice of Consistency from the 

Department when operating charters between the United States and Haneda.

1

 

We have determined that the demand for U.S.-Haneda charters for the 2015 calendar year can 

continue to be met by using the U.S.-Tokyo charter allocation procedures that were 

implemented for the 2008 calendar year and have remained in place for subsequent calendar

years. Specifically, the 600 U.S.-Haneda charters will be available to U.S. carriers for 

distribution for the 2015 calendar year on a first-come, first-served basis subject to the 

following procedures and conditions:

1. Applications to operate U.S.-Haneda charters may be filed no earlier than 120 days in 

advance of the flight date.

2 For the period January 1 through October 31, 2015, 

carriers may apply for up to 50 charters per month. After October 31, 2015, no 

restrictions apply on the number of charters that may be applied for each month;

2. Applications must identify the type of charter (passenger or cargo); the date of each 

one-way flight; the charterer(s); the city-pair markets involved by direction; the type 

of aircraft to be used; and (for cargo charters) the type of cargo transported. Carriers 

may be asked to provide copies of signed charter contracts; 

 1 This does not relieve U.S. carriers from the requirement to obtain proper authorization for all U.S.-Japan 

charters from the Japan Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MLIT). 2 Applications should be sent by e-mail to darren.jaffe@dot.gov, or by fax to 202-366-3694.
3. The Department will grant U.S.-Haneda charter pool allocations by providing a Notice 

of Consistency to applicant carriers;3

4. Carriers receiving a charter pool allocation shall, in writing, return any unused 

allocations to the U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division.

4

By:

Paul L. Gretch, Director

Office of International Aviation

(SEAL)

Dated: December 3, 2014

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.gov

 3 The carrier must also obtain proper authorization for its U.S.-Haneda charters from the Japan MLIT. 4 This notification must be received within two business days of the carrier’s determination that an allocated 

flight or flights will not operate.
Santee National Wildlife Refuge

Marc Epstein - Refuge Manager

2125 Fort Watson Road

Summerton, SC 29148

Phone: 803-478-2217

http://www.fws.gov/santee/

July 2008
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2281]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than February 13, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (John E. Yorke, Senior Vice 
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Frank Phillips Giltner III, Omaha, Nebraska; to acquire an 
additional 60 percent, for a total of 100 percent, of the voting shares 
of The Avoca Company, Avoca, Nebraska, and thereby indirectly acquire 
Farmers State Bank, Omaha, Nebraska.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 24, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-2281 Filed 1-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. REVISED OPINION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30497 Conference Calendar

DENNIS RAY PADEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus KATHLEEN M. HAWK, KEITH HALL, VIDRINE, DR., FRED GILLEY, MICHAEL DAVIS, ROBERT D. HOLMES, ELWIN, DR., TOM BOYETTE, WALKER, DR., TURNBO, MR., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-708

- - - - - - - - - - March 16, 1998 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
We sua sponte withdraw our prior opinion of February 10, 1998, and substitute the instant opinion. Dennis Ray Paden, federal prisoner # 47044-079, is BARRED from proceeding in forma pauperis (IFP) under the PrisonNo. 97-30497 - 2 - Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA) because, on at least three prior occasions while incarcerated, Paden has brought a civil action or appeal in a United States court that was dismissed as frivolous. See Paden v. Hawk , No. 96-10660 (5th Cir. Aug. 22, 1996)(unpublished); Paden v. Hall , No. 95-CV-02007 (W.D. La. May 16, 1996)(unpublished); Paden v. Holloman , No. 93-CV-01016 (S.D. Tx. May 11, 1993) (unpublished); see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, Paden’s IFP status is DECERTIFIED, and he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is in prison unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The appeal is DISMISSED. Paden has 15 days from the date of this opinion to pay the full appellate filing fee of $105 to the clerk of the district court, should he wish to reinstate his appeal.
MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED; IFP DECERTIFIED;
APPEAL DISMISSED.
255 La. 548

#### MARYLAND NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Honorable Jim GARRISON, District Attorney in and for the Parish of Orleans.

No. 50374.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 12, 1970.

In re: Maryland National Insurance Company applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Granted. See order Orleans Parish.

On considering the petition of relator in the above entitled and numbered cause:

It is ordered that the Honorable Matthew S. Braniff, Judge, Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, issue commissions permitting the relator, Maryland National Insurance Company, to take the depositions of Mr. W. Hardie Davis and Mr. William Stroud in Miami, Florida.

It is further ordered that in the event the respondent judge fails to comply with the aforesaid order on or before March 26, 1970, that a writ of certiorari issue herein directing the trial judge to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, in this proceeding and that said judge shall show cause in this Court on June 10, 1970 at 11:00 a. m. why the petition of relator should not be granted.
**Food Processing Statistics for the Former USSR (94017)**
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 167 (Thursday, August 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45631-45632]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22864]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


National Defense Panel Meeting

AGENCY: DoD, National Defense Panel.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and summary agenda for the 
meeting of the National Defense Panel on September 15 and 16, 1997. In 
accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended [5 U.S.C. App. II, (1982)], it has been 
determined that this National Defense Panel meeting concerns matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1982), and that accordingly this meeting 
will be closed to the public from 0830-1700, September 15 and 16, 1997 
in order for the Panel to discuss classified material.

DATES: September 15 and 16, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Suite 532, 1931 Jefferson Davis Hwy, Arlington VA.


[[Page 45632]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Defense Panel was established 
on January 14, 1997 in accordance with the Military Force Structure 
Review Act of 1996, Public Law 104-201. The mission of the National 
Defense Panel is to provide the Secretary of Defense and Congress with 
an independent, non-partisan assessment of the Secretary's Quadrennial 
Defense Review and an Alternative Force Structure Analysis. This 
analysis will explore innovative ways to meet the national security 
challenges of the twenty-first century.

PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND AGENDA: The National Defense Panel will meet in 
closed session from 0830-1700 on September 15 and from 0830-1700 on 
September 16, 1997. During the closed session on September 15 the Panel 
will meet with Deborah R. Lee, Assistant Secretary of Defense for 
Reserve Affairs at the Crystal Mall 3 office. On September 16 during 
the closed session the Panel will meet with Gen. Anthony Zinni, 
CINCCENT MacDill, AFB, FL at the Crystal Mall 3 office. On September 16 
during the closed session the National Defense Panel staff will present 
updates on Force Structure Analysis and Special Issues at the Crystal 
Mall 3 office.
    The determination to close the meeting is based on the 
consideration that it is expected that discussion will involve 
classified matters of national security concern throughout.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please contact the National Defense 
Panel at (703) 602-4175/6.

    Dated: August 22, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-22864 Filed 8-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M