alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Hydrology of the Great Plains aquifer system in Nebraska, Colorado, Kansas, and adjacent areas

By: J. O. HelgesenR. B. LeonardR. J. Wolf

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1414E

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Ex parte L. M. CATER.

77-748.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Sept. 29, 1978.

SHORES, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit      21.0  Subsidiaries**

| Subsidiaries                            |   | PercentageOwnership |   | Jurisdiction                orState                of Incorporation |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|---------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    |   |                |   |                                                                |
| Northeast                Community Bank |   | 100%                |   | United                States                                        |
|                                    |   |                |   |                                                                |
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

NAME                                                      STATE OF ORGANIZATION

US Oncology Corporate, Inc.                                       Delaware
AOR Real Estate, Inc.                                             Delaware
RMCC Cancer Center, Inc.                                          Delaware
AOR Management Company of Indiana, Inc.                           Delaware
AOR Holding Company of Indiana, Inc.                              Delaware
AOR of Indiana Management Partnership                             Indiana
AOR Management Company of Oregon, Inc.                            Delaware
AOR Management Company of Missouri, Inc.                          Delaware
AOR Management Company of Arizona, Inc.                           Delaware
AOR Management Company of Oklahoma, Inc.                          Delaware
AOR Management Company of Pennsylvania, Inc.                      Delaware
AOR Management Company of Virginia, Inc.                          Delaware
AOR Management Company of New York, Inc.                          Delaware
AOR Management Company of Texas, Inc.                             Delaware
AOR Management Company of Ohio, Inc.                              Delaware
AOR Management Company of Kansas, Inc.                            Delaware
AORT Holding Company, Inc.                                        Delaware
AOR of Texas Management Limited Partnership                       Texas
AORIP, Inc.                                                       Delaware
AOR Synthetic Real Estate, Inc.                                   Delaware
Greenville Radiation Care, Inc.                                   Delaware
Physician Reliance Network, Inc.                                  Delaware
US Oncology Research, Inc.                                        Texas
Physician Reliance Holdings, LLC                                  Delaware
PRN Physician Reliance, LLC                                       Texas
Physician Reliance, L.P.                                          Texas
Michigan Pharmaceutical Services, LLC                             Delaware
Iowa Pharmaceutical Services, LLC                                 Delaware
New Mexico Pharmaceutical Services, LLC                           Delaware
California Pharmaceutical Services, LLC                           Delaware
Washington Pharmaceutical Services, LLC                           Delaware
North Carolina Pharmaceutical Services, LLC                       Delaware
ex1014.htm




Exhibit 10.10


UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

















                                                                                                               October 27, 2015


U.S. $150,000.00 









FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Eos Petro, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Issuer”), hereby promises to pay to the order of Plethora Enterprises, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company (the “Payee”), at such place as the Payee shall direct in writing, the principal sum of One Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000.00), with interest at 10.00% on the unpaid balance.  All references to Dollars herein are to lawful currency of the United States of America.







All unpaid principal of this Note and accrued interest shall be due and payable on January 1, 2016 (the “Maturity Date”). This Note may be prepaid at any time in whole or in part without penalty.







In any action at law or in equity to enforce or construe any provisions or rights under this Note, the unsuccessful party or parties to such litigation, as determined by a court pursuant to a final offer, judgment or decree, shall pay to the successful party or parties all costs, expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by such successful party.







This Note and all actions arising out of or in connection with this Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to the conflicts of law provisions of the State of California, or of any other state.




 


Eos Petro, Inc.


A Nevada corporation












By: /s/ Nicholas Konstant


    Nicholas Konstant


    Its: Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 12.2

CERTIFICATIONS

     I, Milton S. McColl, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Progen Industries
Limited;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.   The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
          by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
          covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control
          over financial reporting; and

     5.   The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of
     directors :

          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
          or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and


<PAGE>
          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date:  December 11, 2003
       -----------------

                                            /s/ Milton S. McColl
                                         -----------------------
                                         Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:Independent review of the U.S. Coast Guard�s reporting of FY ... drug controlperformance summary report.**
 
2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013
 
SuDoc Number:HS 1.22/2-4:
Item Number:0520-B-55 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000886392
 
July 3, 2018
EXHIBIT 32(a)

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 of Citizens Holding Company (the Company), as
filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), I, Greg L. McKee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                        
|----------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 8, 2006 |  | /s/ Greg L. McKee      
|                  |  | Greg L. McKee          
|                  |  | Chief Executive Officer
mstx-ex104_488.htm


 

Exhibit 10.4

Execution Version

FIRST AMENDMENT TO WARRANT AGREEMENT

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”), dated as of September 28, 2015, to the Warrant Agreement to Purchase Shares of the Common Stock of Mast Therapeutics, Inc., dated as of August 11, 2015 (the “Warrant Agreement”), is made by and between MAST THERAPEUTICS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and HERCULES TECHNOLOGY III, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Warrantholder”).

A. The Company and the Warrantholder desire to amend the Warrant Agreement as set forth herein, such modifications to be effective as of the date hereof.

B. Capitalized terms that are not otherwise defined in this Amendment have the respective meaning set forth in the Warrant Agreement.

AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. The definition of “Warrant Coverage” in Section 1 of the Warrant Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

““Warrant Coverage” means $625,000.”

2. Except as specifically amended hereby, the Warrant Agreement shall continue to be in full force and effect and is hereby in all respects ratified and confirmed. The execution, delivery and effectiveness of this Amendment shall not operate as a waiver of any right, power or remedy of Warrantholder under the Warrant Agreement, and it does not constitute a waiver of any provision of the Warrant Agreement.

3. This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the law of the State of California.

4. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Delivery by facsimile, .pdf or other electronic imaging means of an executed counterpart of a signature page to this Amendment shall be effective as delivery of an original executed counterpart of this Amendment. Warrantholder may also require that any such documents and signatures delivered by facsimile, .pdf or other electronic imaging means be confirmed by a manually signed original thereof; provided that the failure to request or deliver the same shall not limit the effectiveness of any document or signature delivered by facsimile, .pdf or other electronic imaging means.

[Remainder of page intentionally blank]

 

 

 

 




 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth above.

 


	
Company:

	
 

	
MAST THERAPEUTICS, INC.

	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
/s/ Brandi Roberts

	
 
	
Name:   Brandi Roberts

	
 
	
Title:     Chief Financial Officer




 


	
WARRANTHOLDER:

	
 

	
HERCULES TECHNOLOGY III, L.P.

	
 
	
 

	
By: 
	
Hercules Technology SBIC Management, 
LLC, its General Partner

	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc.,
 its Manager

	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
/s/ Ben Bang

	
 
	
Name:   Ben Bang

	
 
	
Title:     Associate General Counsel




 

[First Amendment To Warrant Agreement]
# DSCR rooted in Native American history

/ Published Nov. 30, 2016
RICHMOND, Va., 
November is Native American Heritage Month.  It is a time to celebrate American Indian culture and contributions.  

In closing out the month long celebrations, Defense Logistics Agency Aviation’s Public Affairs Officer, Amy Clement, talks about Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia’s rich Native American history and an incredible find of more than 1,000 Native American artifacts on the center.

Listen to her story on DLA’s**Youtube channel.**

For more installation history, visit DLA Aviation’s public page.

For information about National Native American Heritage Month, visit the following sites:

Society of American Indian Government EmployeesAmerican Indian Science & Engineering Society(AISES)**Library of Congress**
EXHIBIT
16.1














June 25,
2008








Securities
and Exchange Commission


100 F
Street, NE


Washington,
D.C.  20549RE: Proxim Wireless Corporation





Dear
Sirs:





We have
been furnished with a copy of the response to Item 4.01 of Form 8-K for the
event that occurred on June 20, 2008, to be filed by our former client, Proxim
Wireless Corporation.  We agree with the statements made in response
to that Item insofar as they relate to our firm.





Very
truly yours,





/s/  Fitzgerald,
Snyder & Co., P.C.





Fitzgerald,
Snyder & Co., P.C.
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Betty Jean ADAMS, Appellee.

No. 11-172.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 20, 1978.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Lacy Mahon, Jr., of Mahon, Farley & Vickers, Jacksonville, for appellee.

*195PER CURIAM.

The trial court held that an affidavit was insufficient on its face to establish probable cause for issuance of a warrant for search of a dwelling. The State appeals.

The affidavit recites:

> Your affiant has been a member of the Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office for two (2) years. A confidential informant within the past twenty-four (24) hours told your affiant that within the past twenty-four (24) hours the informant had been inside the above-described residence. While inside the residence, the informant admits that he (informant) purchased a quantity of what was represented by the occupant to be Marijuana. After purchasing the substance, the informant brought it to your affiant who identified the substance as Cannabis, commonly known as Marijuana.

> The informant can readily identify Marijuana. Your affiant has had police training and experience identifying Cannabis, commonly known as Marijuana.

> Said informant further related at said time that there is an additional quantity of Cannabis, commonly known as Marijuana, in the above-described residence. Your affiant believes said informant because the said admission by said informant constituted an admission against penal interest.

The affidavit is insufficient in that it fails to recite sufficient underlying circumstances from which the magistrate could independently determine that the hearsay information was reliable and that the informant was credible. *Aguilar v. Texas,*378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1509, 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964); *Spinelli v. United States,*393 U.S. 410, 89 S.Ct. 584, 21 L.Ed.2d 637 (1969). Specifically, the affidavit fails to recite facts to establish the credibility of the informant. *Davis v. State,*346 So.2d 141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

A statement against an informant’s penal interest may contribute to his reliability. *Davis v. State,*supra; *State*v. *Patterson,*309 So.2d 555 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); *State v. Henderson,*318 So.2d 524 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); *State v. Jacobs,*320 So.2d 45 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). However, the facts recited in this affidavit did not establish an admission against the penal interests of the informant. We do not believe that such a statement made by a “confidential informant” would constitute an admission against his penal interest or that such admission would carry its own indicia of reliability.

Therefore, the order granting the motion to suppress is AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and SMITH, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Mind2Market,   Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, James
Clark, CEO of the company,  certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ James Clark
                                         --------------------------------
                                         James Clark, CEO

Dated: August 24, 2004
255 La. 236

#### Karl J. GREMILLION v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY.

No. 50314.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1970.

In re: Travelers Indemnity Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 228 So.2d 520.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### Nolan Felix BURCHIL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-630.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 17, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal quashed.
Stratotankers, Fueling the fight from above
 
  By Airman 1st Class Gerald R. Willis
                       Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Andersen Air Force Base website.
# Richmond’s Branch retires after 36 years of federal service

/ Published Dec. 9, 2016
RICHMOND, Virginia, 
Charita Branch, a supervisory general supply specialist with DLA Distribution Richmond, Va., will retire on Jan. 2, after 36 years of federal service. 

Branch began her government career in 1980 at the Defense Supply Center Richmond as a secretary and steadily worked her way up the GS ladder over the years from a data transcriber to a supply specialist before finally in 2002 becoming a supervisory general supply specialist and accountable officer at DLA Distribution Richmond. 

During her 36-year career, Branch has been witness to constant system upgrades, which have allowed her the ability to resolve any issues and interact with customers in real time. 

“I have been fortunate to have had great supervisors and managers who have mentored me and allowed me to grow my strengths,” said Branch, when asked about what she considers the key to success during her extensive career. “they also provided me opportunities to learn and interact with other distribution centers and headquarters. I have always been acknowledged for my contributions to the organization.”

Branch has been afforded numerous experiences during to her 36-year career with the Department of Defense, including being a part of a team in the early 1990’s, before Distribution Standard System was in existence, that developed a cross functional training manual and training system. “I had the opportunity to present it to DLA Distribution Jacksonville, Fla., as well as travel to other distribution centers to assist during special projects.”

When asked if she could pinpoint the highlight of her career with the Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, Branch said “the ability to resolve issues and problems presented to me by internal, as well as external customers. Customer service is my goal.”

The DLA organization means many things to many different people. For Branch it has provided opportunities she never dreamed of, “and a career I love. The DLA organization is a family!”

Branch has much knowledge to pass on to current and future DLA employees. She recommends everyone “do the right thing because it is the right thing to do. It is okay to disagree without being disagreeable. Treat everyone with respect.”