October 20 , 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Was hington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations from 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b);14 CFR Part 21;14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b);91.7 (a);91.9 (b) (2);91.103(b); 91.109;91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a);91.203(a) & (b);91.405 (a); 91.407(a) (1); 91.409 (a) (2);91.417 (a) & (b).

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the Reform Act) and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Luck Stone Corporation , operator of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (“sUASs”) equipped to use sUAS to inspect and document mining operations and safety inspections. These include:

• Mining equipment s afety inspection,

• Stone products inv entory c ollection

,

• Photography and videography,

• Mining p r operty inspection (High Wall Inspections )

• Aerial surveying,

• Construction site inspection and monitoring

Luck Stone Corporation hereby applies for an exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) to allow commercial operation of its sUASs, so long as such operations are conducted within and

under the conditions outlined herein or as may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333.

Applicant requests that the issued exemption includes closed-set filming and photography

.

As described more fully below, the requested exempt ion would permit the operation of small, unmanned and relatively inexpensive sUAS under controlled con ditions in airspace that is 1) limited 2) predetermined 3)

controlled as to acce ss and 4) would provide s afety enhancements to the already safe operations using

conventional aircraft.

Approval of this exemption would thereby enhance safe ty and fulfill t he Secretary of Transportation’s (the FAA Administrator’s) responsibilities to “...establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in

the national airspace system.” Section 333(c) of the Reform Act.

The name and address of the applicant is:

Luck Stone Corporation

Trevor L. Blanning

515 Stone Mill Drive Manakin-Sabot, VA 23103

Ph: 804 -784-6300

E-Mail: TLBlanning@LuckStone.com

Regulations from which the exemption is requested:

14 CFR Part 21 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b) 14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b)14 C.F.R. 91.7 (a) 14 CFR 91.9 (b) (2)

14 C.F.R. 91.103

14 C.F.R. 91.109

14 C.F. R. 91.119

14 C.F.R. 91.121 14 CFR 91.151 (a) 14 CFR 91.203 (a) & (b) 14 CFR 91.405 (a) 14 CFR 407 (a) (1) 14 CFR 409 (a) (2) 14 CFR 417 (a) & (b)

This exemption application is expressly submitted to fulfill Congress’ goal in passing Section 333(a) through (c) of the Reform Act. This law directs the Secretary of Transportation to consider whether certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airs pace system (NAS) before completion of the rulemaking required under Section 332 of the Reform Act. In making this determination, the Secretary is required to determine which types of UASs do not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public or pose a threat to national security in light of the following:

• The s UAS’s size, weight, speed, and operational capability;

• Operation of the s UAS in close proximity to airports and populated areas;

and

• Operation of the s UAS within visual line of sight of the operator.

Reform Act § 333 (a). Lastly, if the Secretary determines that such vehicles “may operate safely in the national airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirem ents for the safe operation of such aircraft in the national airspace system .” Id. §333(c) (emphasis added).

Applicant interprets this provision to place the duty on the Administrator to not only process applications for exemptions under section 333, but for the Administrator to craft conditions for the safe operation of the UAS, if

it should be determined that the conditions set forth herein do not fulfill the statutory requirements for approval. The Federal Aviation Act expressly grants the FAA the authority to issue exemptions. This statutory authority by its terms includes exempting civil aircraft, as the term is defined under §40101 of the Act that includes sUASs, from the requirement that all civil aircraf t must have a current airworthiness certificate.

The Administrator may grant an exemption from a require ment of a regulation prescribed under subsection (a) or (b) of this section or any sections 44702-44716 of this title if the Administrator finds the exemption in the public interest. 49 U.S.C. §44701(f) See also 49 USC §44711(a); 49 USC §44704; 14 CFR §91.203 (a) (1).

Luck Stone's s UASs are rotorcraft, weighting 55 or fewer lbs. including payload. They operate, under normal conditions at a speed of no more than 50 knots and have the capability to hover, and move in the vertical and horizontal plane simultaneously. They will operate only in line of sight and will operate only within a sterile

area. Such operations will insure that the s UAS will “not create a hazard to users of the national airspace

s ys tem or the public.”

Reform Act Section 333 (b). Given the small size of the sUASs involved and the re stricted sterile environment

within which they will operate, the applicant falls squarely within that zone of safety (an equivalent level of safety) in which Congress envisioned that the FAA must, by exemption, allow commercial operations of UASs to commence immediately. Also due to the size of the s UASs and the restricted areas in which the relevant sUASs will operate, approval of the application presents no national security issue. Given the clear direction in Section 333 of the Reform Act, the authority contained in the Federal Aviation Act, as amended; the strong equivalent level of safety surrounding the proposed operations, and the significant public benefit, including enhanced safety, reduction in environmental impacts, in cluding reduced emissions a ssociated with allowing UASs, the grant of the requested exemptions is in the public interest. Accordingly, the applicant respectfully requests that the FAA grant the requested exemption without delay.AIRCRAFT AND EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY

The applicant will operate the following aircraft :

1. DJI Inspire 1

2. DJI Phantom 2

3. DJI Phantom 3

The applicant proposes that the exemption requested herein apply to civil aircraft that have the characteristics and that operate with the limitations listed herein. These limita tions provid e for at least an equivalent or even higher level of safety to operations under the current regulatory structure because th e proposed operations represent a safety enhancement to the already safe operations conducted with conventional aircraft. These

limitations and conditions to which Luck Stone Corporation

. a grees to be bound when conducting commercial operations under an FAA issued exemption include:

• The sUAS will weigh less than 55 lbs.

• Flights will be operated within line of sight of a pilot and/or observer.

• Maximum total flight time for each operational flight will be 2 0 minutes. Flights will b e terminated at 25% battery power reserve should that occur prior to the 3 0 minute limit.

4. Flights will be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet AGL or, not more than 200 feet above an elevated platform from which observ ation / filming is planned.

5. Minimum c rew for each operation will c onsist of the UAS Pilot, the Visual Observer, and/or the

Camera Operator.

• The UAS will only operate within a confined “Sterile Area” of the flight operations area.

• A briefing will be conducted in regard to the planned sUAS operations prior to each day’s activities. It

will be mandatory that all personnel who will be performing duties within the boundaries of the safety perimeter be present for this briefing.

• 10. The operator will obtain the consent of all persons involved and ensure that only consenting persons will be allowed within 100 feet of the flight operation, and this radius may be reduced to 30 feet based upon an equivalent level of safety determination.

• 11. Pilot and observer will have been trained in operation of UAS generally and received up-to-date information on the particular UAS to be operated.

• Observer and pilot will at all times are able to communicate by voice and/or text.

• Written and/or oral permission from the relevant property holders will be obtained.

• All required permissions and permits will be obtained from territorial, state, county or city

jurisdictions, including local law enforcement, fire, or other appropriate go vernmental agencies.

• If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UAS will have c apability to return to a predetermined (Home) location within the Security Perimeter and land.

• The UAS will have the capability to abort a fli ght in cas e of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H: Airw orthiness Certificates 14 C.F.R. §91.203 (a) (1)

Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, establishes the procedural requirements for the issuance of airworthiness certificates as required by FAR §91. 203 (a) (1). Given the size and limited operating area associat ed with the aircraft to be utilized by the App licant, an exemption from Part 21 Subpart H meets the requirements of an equivalent level of safety under Part 11 and Section 333 of the Reform Act. The Federal Aviation Act (49 U.S.C.§44701 (f)) and Section 333 of the Reform Act both authorize the FAA to exempt aircraft from the requirement for an airworthiness cert ificate, upon consideration of the size, weight, speed, operational capability, and prox imity to airports and populated areas of the particular UAS. In all cases, ananalysis of these criteria demonstrates that the UAS operated without an airworthiness certificate, in the restricted environment and under the conditions proposed will be at least as safe, or safer, than a conventional aircraft (fixed wing or rotorcraft) operating with an airworthiness certificate without the restrictions and conditions proposed.

The UAS to be operated hereunder is less than 55 lbs. fully loaded, carries neither a pilot nor passenger, carries no ex plosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and operates exclusively within a secured area as set

out in the Manual. Unlike other civil aircraft, operations unde r this exemption will be tightly controlled and monitored by both the operator, pursuant to the M anual’s requirements, and under the requirements and in compliance with local pu blic safety requirements, to provide security for the area of operation as is now done with conventional filming. The FAA will have advance notice o f all operations. These safety enhancements, which already apply to civil aircraft operated in connection with motion picture and television production, provide a greater degree of safety to the public and property owners than conventional operations conducted

with airworthiness certificates issued under 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Lastly, application of these same

criteria demonstrates th at there is no credible threat to national security posed by the UAS, due to its size, speed of operation, location of operation, lack of explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and inability to carry a substantial external load.

14 C.F.R. § 45.23 (b). Marking of the Aircraft

The regulation requires: When marks include only the Roma n capital letter "N" and the registration number is displayed on limited, restricted or light-sport cat egory aircraft or experimental or provisionally certific ated aircraft, the operator must also di splay on that aircraft near e ach entrance to the cabin, cockpit, or pilot station,

in letters not less than 2 inches nor more than 6 inches high, the words "limited," "restricted," "light-sport," "experimental," or "provisional," as applicable.

Even though the UAS will have no ai rworthiness certific ate, a n exemption may be needed as the UAS will have

no entrance to the cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which the word “Experimental” can be placed. Given the

size of the UAV, two-inch lettering will be impossible. Th e word “Experimental” will be placed on the fuselage in compliance with §45.29 (f).

The equivalent level of safety will be provided by having the sUAV marked on its fuselage as required by §45.29 (f) where the pilot, observer and others working with the sUAV will see the identificatio n of the UAS as “Experimental.” The FAA has issued the following exempt ions to this re gulation to Exemptions Nos. 10700, 8738, 10167 and 10167A.

14 C.F.R. §91.7(a): Civil aircraft airworthiness.

The regulation requires that no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in airworthy condition. As there

will be no airworthiness certificate issued for the aircraft, should this exemption be granted, no FAA regulatory standard will exist for determining airworthiness. Given the size of the aircraft and the requirements contained in the Manual for maintenance and use of safety check lists pr ior to each flight, as set forth in Sections J, L and Q, an equivalent level of safety will be provided.

14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2): Civil Aircraft Flight Manual in the Aircraft.

Section 91.9 (b) (2) prov ides: No person may operate a U.S.-registered civil aircraft ...(2) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is not required by §21.5 of this chapter, unless there is availa ble in the aircraft a current approved airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual, approved manual material, markings, and placards, or any combination thereof. The sUAS, given its size and configuration has no ability or place to carry such a flight manual on the aircraft, not only because there is no pilot on board, but because there is no room or capacity to carry such an item on the aircraft.

The equivalent level of safety will be maintained by keeping the flight manual at the ground control point where the pilot flying the sUAS will have immediate access to it. The FAA has is sued the following exemptions to thisregulation: Exemption Nos. 8607, 8737, 8738, 9299, 9299A, 9565, 9565B, 10167, 10167A, 10602, 32827, and

10700.

14 C.F.R. § 91.103: Preflight action

This regulation requires each pilot in command to take certain actions before flight to insure the safety of flight. As FAA approved rotorcraft flight manuals will not be provided for the aircraft an exemption will be needed. The PIC will take all actions including reviewing weather, flight battery requirements, landing and takeoff distances and aircraft performance data before initiation of flight.

14 C.F.R. §91.109: Flight instruction :

Section 91.103 provides that no person may operate a civil aircraft (except a manned free balloon) that is being used for flight instruction unless that aircraft has fully functioning dual controls. s UASs and remotely piloted aircraft, by their design do not have fully functional dual controls. Flight control is accomplished through the use of a control box that communicates with the aircraft via radio communications. The FAA has approved exemptions for flight training without fully functional dual controls for a number of aircraft and for flight instruction in experimental aircraft. See Exemption Nos.5778K & 9862A.

The equivalent level of safety provided by the fact that neither a pilot nor passengers will be carried in the aircraft and by the size and speed of the aircraft.

14 C.F.R. §91.119: Minimum safe altitudes

Section 91.119 establishes safe altitudes for operation of civil aircraft. Section 91.119 (d) allows helicopters to be operated at less than the minimums prescribed, provided the person operating the helicopter complies with any route or altitudes prescribed for helicopters by the FAA. As this exemption is for a sUAS that is a helicopter and the exemption requests authority to operate at altitudes up to 400 AGL, or not more than 200 above an elevated platform from which filming is planned, an ex emption may be needed to allow such operations. As set forth herein, except for the limited conditions stated in the Manual, the UAS will never operate at higher than 400 AGL. It will however be operated in a restricted area with security perimeter, where buildings and people will not be exposed to operations without their pre-obtained consent. The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, and speed of the UAS as well as the location where it is operated. No flight will be taken without the required permission of the property owner or local officials. Because of the advance notice to the property owner and participants in the aerial activity, all affected individuals will be aware of the planned flight operations. Compared to flight operations with aircraft or rotorcraft weighting far more than the maximum 55lbs. proposed herein and the lack of flammable fuel, any risk associated with these operations is far less than those presently presented with conventional aircraft operating at or below 500 AGL other industries. In addition, the low-altitude operations of the sUAS will ensure separation between these small-UAS operations and the operations of conventional aircraft that must comply with Section 91.119.

14 C.F.R. §91.121 Altimeter Settings

This regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude by reference to an altimeter that is set “...to the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.” As the sUAS may not have a barometric altimeter, but instead a GPS altitude read out, an exemption may be needed.

An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by the operator, pursuant to the Manual and Safety Check list, confirming the altitude of the launch site shown on the GPS altitude indicator before flight.

14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions

Section 91.151 (a) prohibits an individual from beginning “a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing, and, assuming normal cruising speed – (1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or(2) At night, to fly after that for at leas t 45 minutes.” The battery powering the sUAS prov ides approximately 40 minutes of powered flight. To meet the 30-minute reserve requir ement in 14 CFR §91.151, sUAS flights would

be limited to approximately 10 minutes in length. Given the limitations on the UAS’s proposed flight area and

the location of its proposed operations within a predetermined area, a longer time frame for flight in daylight or night VFR conditions is reasonable. Applicant believes that an exemption from 14 CF R §91.151(a) falls within the scope of prior exempt ions. See Exemption 10673 (allowing Lockheed Martin Corporation to op erate

without c ompliance with FAR 91.151 (a)). Operating the small UAS, in a tightly controlled area where only people and property owners or official repres entatives w ho hav e signed waivers will be allowed, with les s than

3 0 minutes of reserve fuel, does not engender the type of risks that Section 91.151(a) was intended to alleviate given the size and speed of the s mall UAS. Additionally, limiting sUAS flights to 10 minutes would greatly reduce the utility for which the exemption will be granted.

Applicant believes that an equivalent level of safety can be ac hieved by limiting flights to 2 0 minutes or 25% of battery power whichever happens first. This restriction would be more than adequate to return the sUAS to its planned landing zone from anywhere in its limited oper ating area. Similar exemptions have been granted to other operations, including Exemptions 2689F, 5745, 10673, and 10808.

14 C.F.R. §91.203 (a) and (b): Carrying Civil Aircraft Certification and Registration

The regulation provides in pertinent part: (a) Except as provided in § 91.715, no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it has within it the following: (1) An appropriate and current airworthiness certificate. . . .(b) No person may operate a c ivil aircraft unless the

airworthines s certificate required by paragraph (a) of this se ction or a sp ecial flight au thorization issued under §91.715 is d isplayed at the cabin or cock pit entrance so that it is legible to passengers or crew. The UAS fully loaded weig hs no more than 55 lbs and is operated without an onboard pilot. As suc h, there is no ability or plac e to carr

y certification and registra tion documents or to display them on the s UAS.

An equivalent level of safety will be ac hieved by k eeping the se documents at the ground control point where the pilot fly ing the sUAS will hav e immediate acc ess to them, to the extent they are applicable to the sUAS.

The FAA has issued numerous ex emptions to this regulation. A representative sample of other exceptions includes Exemption Nos. 9565, 9665, 9789, 9789A, 9797, 9797A, 9816A, and 10700.

14 C.F.R. §91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a) (2); 417(a) & (b): Maintenance Inspections

These regulations require that an aircraft operator or owner “shall have that aircraft inspec ted as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as presc ribed in part 43 of this cha pter...,” and others shall inspect or maintain the aircraft incompliance with Part 43. Given that these section and Part 43 apply only to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, these sections will not apply to the applicant. The operator pursuant to the flight manual and operating handbook will accomplish maintenance. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because these small UASs are very limited in size and will c arry a small payload and operate only in restricted areas for limited periods of time. If mechanic al issues arise the UAS can land immediately and will be operating from no higher than 400 feet AGL. As provided in the Manual, the operator will ensure that the UAS is in working order prior to initiating flight, perform required maintenance, and keep a log of any maintenance performed. Moreover, the operator is the person most familiar with the aircraft and best suited to maintain the

aircraft in an airworthy condition to provide the equivalent lev el of safety.

*****

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11, the following summary is provided for publication in the Federal Register,

should it be determined that publication is needed:

Applicant seeks an exemption from the following rules:14 C.F.R. §21, subpart H; 14 C.F.R 45.23(b);14 C.F.R. §§ 61.113( a) & (b);91.7 (a); 91.9(b) (2);91.103(b);91.109; 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a);91.203(a) and (b); 91.405 (a); 91.407 (a) (1); 91.409 (a) (2); 91.409 (a) (2) and 91.417 (a) & (b) to operate commercially a small unmanned vehicle (55lbs o r less). Approval of exemptions allowing commercial operati ons of s UAS, will enhance safety by reducing risk. Conventional operations, using jet or piston power aircraft, operate at extremely low altitudes just feet from the subjects being filmed and in extreme proximity to people and structures and present the risks associated with vehicles

that weigh in the neighborhood of 4,000lbs, c arrying large amounts of jet A or other fuel. Such aircraft must fly to and from the operational location. In contrast, a sUAS weighing fewer than 55 lbs. and powered by batteries eliminates virtually all of that risk given the reduced mass and lack of combustible fuel carried on board. The sUAS is carried to the operation site and not flown. The sUAS will carry no passengers or crew and, therefore, will not expose them to the risks asso ciat ed with manned aircraft flights. The operation of small UASs, weighting less than 55 lbs., conducted in the strict conditions outlined above, will provide an equivalent level of safety supporting the grant of the exemptions requested herein, including exempting the applicant from the requirements of Part 21 and allowing commercial operations. These lightweight aircraft operate at slow speeds, close to the ground, and in a sterile environment and, as a result, are far safer than conventional operations conducted with turbine helicopters opera ting in close proximity to the ground and people.

Privacy

All flights will occur over private or controlled a ccess property with the property owner’s prior consent and knowledge. All flights will occur on our private mining property. Satisfaction of the criteria provided in Section

333 of the Reform Act of 2012- -size, weight, speed, operating capabilities, proximity to airports and populated

areas and operation within visual line of sight and national security – provide more than adequate justification for the grant of the requested exemptions allowing commercial operation of applicant’s UAS.

Trev or Blanning Luck Stone Corporation