alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA Troop Support celebrates retirees' 71 years of combined service

/ Published Oct. 30, 2017
PHILADELPHIA, 
Two employees were honored for their combined 71 years of federal service with the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support at a retirement ceremony Oct. 26.

Diane Di Silvestro, contract specialist with the Medical supply chain, is retiring after 41 years of service. Diana Brown, supply technician with Installation Operations, is retiring after 30 years.

Army Col. Mark Simerly, DLA Troop Support commander, presided over the ceremony and said the Di Silvestro and Brown years of service have made a lasting impact on the reputation and excellence of DLA Troop Support.

“Our service members around the world don’t have time to think twice about where their supplies come from,” Simerly said. “They know there are folks as dedicated as service members, like you two, who ensure they are being equipped on time with the best stuff to complete their mission.”

Di Silvestro began her career with the Defense Personnel Support Center in 1976 as a clerk. She worked in the secretarial pool before earning a permanent position as a procurement clerk with Medical.She also worked in Subsistence before finishing her career with Medical, which included an assignment resolving more than $1 million in outstanding invoices. 

“DLA Troop Support has been the best place to work at and raise a family,” Di Silvestro said, “I want to thank my family for their support and the friends that I’ve made over the years. I loved my time with the federal service and I would highly recommend it to anybody.”

Di Silvestro plans to spend time with her family and friends, travel with her husband, and adopt a rescue dog.

Brown began her career with the Medical supply chain, but also worked in Subsistence and Installation Operations. Brown helped format food for troops during Operation Desert Storm, and worked in the Emergency Supply Operations Center’s 24-hour Ground Troop Communication Room. Brown said her greatest achievement was being the founder and first manager of the local chapel and meditation room.

“The best part of my career and this experience was the people,” Brown said.“I’ve worked with great people.It meant a lot to work with the service members, and it was a pleasure to serve alongside you.”

Brown, an ordained minister, plans to continue work in ministry after retirement, as well as travel, spend time with family and friends, hike and swim.

“The professionalism displayed here at DLA Troop Support every day is the type of professionalism that you two have displayed throughout your careers,” Simerly said. “Thank you both for your service to our nation, the Defense Logistics Agency and, most importantly, the men and women of the Armed Forces.”
**-  Beltsville  \ BARC 
-  Animal & Natural Resources 
-  Animal Parasitic Diseases 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">	You are here: 						Research / 								**Research Project:**EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CONTROL OF NEOSPORA CANINUM AND RELATED PROTOZOA
**Location: Animal Parasitic Diseases**
												Project Number: 1265-32000-082-00Project Type:																				Appropriated

Start Date: Jan 22, 2007End Date: Jan 21, 2011

**Objective:**Discover vaccine candidates that are effective in preventing and controlling neosporosis.  Determine the role of management practices and on-farm exposure to dogs, rodents, and wildlife in the risk of contracting neosporosis. Determine life cycle, epidemiology, and control of Sarcocystis neurona.
**Approach:**Vaccine candidates will be discovered using genomics and proteomics tools and whole-cell and subunit vaccines will be tested in efficacy studies using the congenital and adult mouse model and the ovine model. Feed contamination with infective oocysts from the definitive canine host and rodent intermediate hosts will be determined as risk factors for horizontal transmission of neosporosis in cattle. Tissue parasitism in horses at different time periods after feeding various doses of S. neurona sporocysts will be evaluated. A search for additional intermediate and definitive hosts of S. neurona will also be conducted. The equine model will be characterized for testing vaccine efficacies and therapeutic interventions. Testing of ponazuril will continue in experimentally-infected horses. The gamma-interferon knock-out mouse model will continue to be used in the search for efficacious drugs against S. neurona. The study of immune basis of clinical EPM, S. neurona infections in various mouse models will continue. The genetic diversity and geographic distribution of S. neurona, microsatellite of new isolates from wildlife will continue.
    Project TeamTuo, Wenbin Jenkins, Mark Dubey, Jitender  
Project Annual Reports FY 2007 Publications  Publications 
Related National Programs Animal Health(103) Related Projects  ADJUVANT EVALUATION USING NEOSPORA ANTIGENS  							Last Modified: 11/05/2008 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-455-000]


Overthrust Pipeline Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

August 26, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 22, 1997, Overthrust Pipeline Company 
(Overthrust) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1-A, First Revised Sheet Nos. 67A and 67B and 
Original Sheet No. 67C, to be effective September 22, 1997.
    Overthrust explains that the proposed tariff sheets revise Section 
15, Scheduling of Gas Receipts and Deliveries, of the General Terms and 
Conditions of its tariff by implementing a second batch period for 
acceptance and processing of intra-day nominations received after 5:01 
p.m. Central Clock Time each gas day.
    Overthrust states that a copy of this filing has been served upon 
its customers, and the Wyoming Public Service Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the 
Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23148 Filed 8-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Helping People Help the Land

Conservation Activity Plan

Grazing Management

December 2011

Grazing Management

A grazing management 

conservation activity plan is a 

	







landowner improve and sustain 

rangeland and pastureland 

resources.

NRCS Technical Service Providers 

(TSPs) prepare these plans using 

inputs such as:


 
 





 planned plant condition


 
 




 balance


 
 





 distribution


 
 





 
 


!

	


 
 





 quality, and diversity


 
 "



Conservation practices 

recommended by such a plan can 

include:


 
 #




 
 $



 
 $






 
 %






 planting


 
 %&





 
 $&'


 
 *



$







www.nrcs.usda.gov 




“Technical Service Providers.”

www.nrcs.usda.gov

USDA is an equal opportunity 

provider and employer.
Exhibit 32

                           MOTORSPORTS EMPORIUM, INC.
                              A Nevada corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of MotorSports Emporium,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
David Keaveney, Chief Executive Officer,  President and Chief Financial Officer,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  SS 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to SS 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authentication,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed from  within  the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  required by Section  906, has been  provided to  MotorSports
Emporium,  Inc., and will be retained by MotorSports Emporium Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: November 14, 2006                 /s/ David Keaveney
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        David Keaveney
                                        Chief Executive Officer, President
                                        and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 11

                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                 (In thousands, except earnings per share data)


                                          Three months ended

                                                 March 31

                                           2001            2000
                                           ----            ----


Net (loss) income                       ($282,740)      ($456,264)

Basic earnings per common share             ($.02)         ($0.06)

Diluted earnings per common share           ($.02)         ($0.06)

Weighted average common shares

outstanding                             11,621,031      7,402,597

Weighted average common shares

outstanding assuming dilution           11,621,031      7,402,597
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                         I, BLAINE FROATS, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AEC. (the
"REGISTRANT");

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "EVALUATION DATE"); and

(c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our required evaluation as of
the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


                                            BY: /S/ BLAINE FROATS
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            BLAINE FROATS
                                            CFO
                  DATE: MAY 12, 2005
Legend

Current Refuge Boundary (3,582 acres)

Cahaba River

National Wildlife Refuge

January 2009

0 0.3 0.6 1.2

Miles
#### James Arthur EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 75-549.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 25, 1977.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Frank B. Kessler, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard P. Zaretsky, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

DOWNEY, Judge.

The sole question involved in this appeal is the failure of the trial court to track the Standard Jury Instruction 2.11(b) on reasonable doubt.

This case was tried in February 1975 before adoption of Florida Standard Jury Instructions, Second Edition, effective February 4, 1976. The Second Edition contains a revised instruction on reasonable doubt, eliminating several paragraphs contained in original instruction No. 2.11(b). In any event, the instruction given by the trial court substantially covers the subject matter contained in Standard Jury Instruction No. 2.12(b) on reasonable doubt. Accordingly, any error in failing to follow the Standard Jury Instruction as promulgated is harmless. *Leverette v. State,*295 So.2d 372 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974).

Lest this conclusion be seen as license to depart from the Standard Jury Instructions as promulgated without good reason, we point to the decision of the Supreme Court of Florida in *State v. Bryan,*287 So.2d 73 (Fla.1973), which sets out the proper approach to the Standard Jury Instructions.

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence appealed from is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.
No. 00-7170.

#### Maynard *v.*Pennsylvania.

Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 21.1

                         HEALTHPLAN SERVICES CORPORATION

                                 SUBSIDIARIES

               HEALTHPLAN SERVICES, INC. (FL)
                (D/B/A HCI HEALTHPLAN SERVICES; HPS SELECT BROKERAGE
                 SERVICES; HARRINGTON BENEFIT SERVICES; R. E. HARRINGTON, INC.)
                    HEALTHPLAN SERVICES INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. (MA)
                    HEALTHPLAN SERVICES INSURANCE AGENCY OF ILLINOIS, INC. (IL)
                    HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS CORPORATION (FL)
                    GROUP BENEFIT ADMINISTRATORS INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. (MA)
                    AMERICAN BENEFIT PLAN ADMINISTRATORS, INC. (CA)
                    PROHEALTH, INC. (DE)
                    (D/B/A HARRINGTON PROHEALTH OR PROHEALTH COMPCARE IN
                     SEVERAL STATES)
                    BENEFIT MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS, INC. (MO)
                    EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SERVICES, INC. (LA)
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

926 

KA 10-01973 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

MARK A. ROBERTS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

AMY L. HALLENBECK, FULTON, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

DONALD H. DODD, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, OSWEGO (MICHAEL G. CIANFARANO OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Oswego County Court (Walter W.

Hafner, Jr., J.), rendered August 9, 2010. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the third

degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737).

Entered: September 30, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          33,405
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   258
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,663
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,850
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           201
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,612
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,663
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,965
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,965)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,965)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0253 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KENT ALLEN TICHENOR,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 5, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening br ief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 7 2021

12/07/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0253
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1264

In re: CHRISTOPHER MCGEE,

 Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:20-cv-00360)

Submitted: July 20, 2021 Decided: July 22, 2021

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher McGee, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher McGee petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court 

has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. He seeks an order from this 

court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals 

that the district court recently took significant action on McGee’s petition. Accordingly, 

we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
256 La. 245

#### Mildred HEADRICK v. PENNSYLVANIA MILLERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 50526.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 8, 1970.

In re: Mildred Headrick, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Evangeline. 232 So.2d 319.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue ; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.

Writ granted, limited, however, to the claim of the plaintiff to penalties and attorney's fee.
| **How do I open .wk1, .wk3, .wk4, .csv, .wpd,    .zip, pdf, .exe, or .dbf files?**

For details on how to open files, see "Information about using    files" on the initial HELP    page.

 

Back to FAQs
USDA Economicsand Statistics SystemAlbert R. Mann Library, Cornell UniversityComments and questions to [email protected] |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Ozzie ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-461.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 6, 1970.

*40Fred A. Jones and Martin Blitstein, Miami, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and BARK-DULL, J., and FRIEDMAN, MILTON, A., Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, defendant, appeals from an adjudication of murder in the second degree in a cause heard by a jury. Points involved in the appeal, amongst others, were whether the Court erred in instructing and reading to the jury F.S. 790.19 F.S.A. and whether the verdict of the jury was against the weight of the evidence.

F.S. § 919.14, F.S.A., provides “If the indictment or information charges a particular degree the jurors may find the defendant guilty of the degree charged or of any lesser degree. The Court shall in all such cases charge the jury as to the degrees of the offense”. It has been held that this statute applies to degree crimes such as homicide and that the Court must instruct on the lesser degrees. See Brown v. State, 206 So.2d 377 (Fla.1968).

Under the authority of this case, we find that the Court did not err in reading to the jury F.S. Sec. 790.19, F.S.A., which provides “whoever, wantonly or maliciously shoots at, within, or into * * * any public or private building, occupied or unoccupied * * *

Appellate Courts will not substitute their judgment for that of a jury on disputed questions of fact. Dixon v. State, 104 So. 2d 122 (Fla.App.). However, it is the duty of the Court to review the evidence to ascertain whether there was sufficient evidence to support the verdict and judgment in the lower Court.

We find that although there may be a conflict in the testimony there was sufficient evidence to support the verdict.

Affirmed.