alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                              HARTMARX CORPORATION
                       STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
                         (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)
                                  (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                                   YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30,
                                         --------------------------------------------
                                          1996     1995     1994     1993      1992
                                         -------  -------  -------  -------  -------- 
<S>                                      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
Earnings (loss) from continuing
 operations before provision for
 income taxes per Consolidated
 Statement of Earnings                   $ 7,700  $ 1,630  $ 5,139  $ 7,682  $(28,980)

Add:

  Interest Expense (a)                    16,681   20,001   21,214   22,869    21,135

  Portion of rents representative
  of the interest factor (a)(b)            3,424    6,114    8,054    9,327    20,088
                                         -------------------------------------------- 
Income as adjusted                       $27,805  $27,745  $34,407  $39,878  $ 12,243
                                         ============================================
Fixed charges:

  Interest expense (a)                   $16,681  $20,001  $21,214  $22,869  $ 21,135

  Portion of rents representative
  of the interest factor (a)(b)            3,424    6,114    8,054    9,327    20,088
                                         --------------------------------------------
Fixed charges                            $20,105  $26,115  $29,268  $32,196  $ 41,223
                                         ============================================
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges          1.38     1.06     1.18     1.24         *
                                         ============================================
* Coverage shortfall                          --       --       --       --  $ 28,980
                                         ============================================
 
</TABLE>

(a)  Includes amounts related to discontinued operations for 1992-1995.

(b)  Represents one-third of rent expense which management believes represents
     a reasonable approximation of the interest component of rent expense.
**-  Northern Plains  
-  Manhattan, KS 
-   
-  Wind Erosion Research Unit 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced SearchPrograms and Projects UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">	You are here: 					Research /							**Research Project:**Wind Erosion Impact on Air Quality in Mexico City
**Location: Wind Erosion Research Unit**
												Project Number: 5430-11120-007-13Project Type: 		

Start Date: Mar 01, 2007End Date: Dec 31, 2009

**Objective:**1.  To characterize the surface properties of the dry lakebed of Lake Texcoco to determine WEPS input parameters and potential amount of PM10 generation from the surface soils.2.  To asses the amount and frequency of the PM10 wind erosion material emitted from the dry lakebed of Lake Texcoco.3.  To train a UNAM scientist in wind erosion sampling and analysis techniques and collaborate on analysis of data from Objectives 1&2 for use with a coupled WEPS and MCCM model.
**Approach:**1. Select two sites in the wind erosion prone area of Lake Texcoco which are the source of fine particulates. At each site, surface soils will be sampled with three replicates. Field erodibility analysis will be performed on soil conditions at the beginning each erosion season.2. One or two sites will be selected on Lake Texcoco which typify erodible surfaces of the lake and are likely to erode (corresponding to sites for Objective 1). Sites will be as nearly level as possible with a minimum 200meters of fetch in the dominant wind direction for the period. At each site, four towers will be placed in the field consisting of BSNE (Fryrear, 1986) and TSI erosion sampling equipment. Each tower will consist of five BSNE type samplers each with openings at heights 0.05, 0.10, 0.35, 0.60, and 1.0 meters and one TSI sampler at 2 meters above the soil surface.  One tower will be in the upwind position and three towers will be situated 100-200 meters downwind from the upwind tower to provide differences in sediment flux in the prevailing wind direction.  The sampling devices will be supplied by WERU. The support towers for the sampling devices will be supplied by UNAM. The samplers will be in place for the approximate wind erosion season of March and April.3. A UNAM scientist will be trained in evaluating soil surface properties for determining WEPS input parameters and PM10 generation potential of the surface soils (Objective 1) in the field. A WERU scientist will travel to the field study site before the erosion season to assist and train UNAM scientists on sampling setup and monitoring techniques (Objective 2). UNAM scientist and WERU scientists will collaborate on analysis of data from Objectives 1&2 for use with a coupled WEPS-MCCM model.
    Project TeamTatarko, John  Aron Jazcilevich - Professor, Center Of Sciences Of The Atmosphere  
Related National Programs Soil Resource Management(202) Air Quality(203)  							Last Modified: 03/22/2007 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 171 (Thursday, September 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23417]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-470-000]


Algonquin Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

August 28, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 26, 1997, Algonquin Gas Transmission 
Company (Algonquin) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheet No. 635 to be 
effective September 25, 1997.
    Algonquin asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Commission's Order No. 636-C, Ordering Paragraph (B) which requires 
any pipeline with a right-of-first-refusal tariff provision containing 
a contract term cap longer than five years to revise its tariff 
consistent with the revised cap of five years adopted in Order No. 636-
C.
    Algonquin states that copies of this filing were served on firm 
customers of Algonquin and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23417 Filed 9-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1


                        View Systems, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officer of View Systems, Inc. certifies (the
"Company") pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(A)    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
       ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(B)    the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.

Date:  May 13, 2005
                                   /s/ Gunther Than
                                   ____________________________________
                                   Gunther Than
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of TREATY ENERGY CORPORATION (the "Company") on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, Randall Newton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date: August 25, 2011
By:
/s/ Andrew V. ReidAndrew V. Reid Chief Executive Officer
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1763 

To promote the employment of workers displaced by Hurricane Katrina in 

connection with Hurricane Katrina reconstruction efforts. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2005 

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To promote the employment of workers displaced by Hurricane Katrina in connection with Hurricane Katrina reconstruction efforts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hurricane Katrina Re5 construction and Displaced Worker Assistance Act of 

6 2005’’. 

7 SEC. 2. FEDERAL CONTRACTING REQUIREMENT. 

8 In entering into a contract to procure services in con9 nection with Hurricane Katrina reconstruction efforts, the 

10 head of an executive agency shall give a preference in the 
2 

•S 1763 IS

1 source selection process to each offeror that employs work2 ers who have been displaced by Hurricane Katrina as not 

3 less than 25 percent of the workforce that will perform 

4 such services. 

5 SEC. 3. PAYMENT OF PREVAILING WAGES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the President’s 

7 proclamation of September 8, 2005, and any other provi8 sion of law, all laborers and mechanics employed by con9 tractors or subcontractors in the performance of Federal 

10 contracts for the procurement of services in connection 

11 with Hurricane Katrina reconstruction efforts shall be 

12 paid wages at rates not less than those prevailing for simi13 lar work in the locality involved as determined by the Sec14 retary of Labor in accordance with subchapter IV of chap15 ter 31 of title 40, United States Code. 

16 (b) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary Labor shall have, 

17 with respect to the labor standards specified in this sec18 tion, the authority and functions set forth in Reorganiza19 tion Plan Numbered 14 of 1950 (15 Fed. Reg. 3176) and 

20 section 3145 of title 40, United States Code. 

21 SEC. 4. EXECUTIVE AGENCY DEFINED. 

22 In this Act, the term ‘‘executive agency’’ has the 

23 meaning given such term in section 4 of the Office of Fed24 eral Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403). 

Æ
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20490 

AUG 2 6 2015 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION Mr. Russ Patterson 

Compliance Certification Manager 

Carlsbad Field Office 

U.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221 

Dear Mr. Patterson: 

As part of the Environmental Protection Agency's completeness review for the 2014 

CRA the Agency would like to have Sandia National Laboratories conduct a sensitivity 

study varying a few parameters related to the non-waste region of the repository. The 

details of the sensitivity study, which includes the parameters to modify and the number 

of replicates, are provided in the enclosure. 

If you have any question regarding approval, please contact Kathy Economy at (202) 

343-9844 or economy.kathleen@epa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Director 

Tom Peake ~ 

Center for Waste Management and 

Regulations 

Enclosure: BRAGFLO Sensitivity Study Request 

Cc (electronic distribution): 

Doug Tonkay, DOE/HQ 

George Basabilvazo, DOE/CBFO 

Paul Shoemaker, SNL 

Chris Camphouse, SNL 

Alton Harris, DOE/HQ 

Dana Bryson, DOE/CBFO 

Nick Stone, EPA Region 6 

WIPP Team 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
EXHIBIT 32.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Amos Eiran, the Acting Chief Executive Officer of Tissera, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
         quarter ended October 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Dated: January 18, 2005



                                           By: /s/Amos Eiran
                                               ----------------------
                                           Name: Amos Eiran
                                           Title: Acting Chief Executive Officer
**Rankings (9X180)**
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Partnership. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                Freddie M. Kotek                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Freddie                M. Kotek                                        |
| Title: | Chief                Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner |
| Date:  | August                13, 2007                                         |
### NO._______________ IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS AUSTIN, TEXAS

JOSE E. DUQUE , Appellant; § § § § COURT OF APPEALS NO. 01-15-00014-CR

v. § § § § TRIAL COURT No. 1363049-A

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. § §

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF APPELLANT

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

COMES NOW Jose E. D uque, by and through the undersigned attorney, whom
very respectfully states as follows:

1. On September 15, 2015 , the First Court of Appeals For The First District of

Texas issued a Non Publish ed , p er c uriam , “Memorandum Opinion” in Ex

Parte Jose E. Duque
, cause number NO. 01 -15-00014- CR

.
2. Ap pellant ’ s Petition for Di s cretionary Review is due on October 15 th , 2015.

3. P ursuant to Rule 68.2(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the

Petitioner respectfully requests a thirty (3 0 ) day extension to file his Petition
for Discretionary Review (PDR)

.
4. There have been no previous extensions to file the PDR in this cause. PD-1344-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 10/15/2015 3:00:14 PM Accepted 10/15/2015 3:38:18 PM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERK2 5. Appellant relies on the following facts as good cause for the requested

extension:

a) During the last 30 days, counsel was actively worki ng on another

case that had a Sentencing Hea ring scheduled for October 7 th

, 2015 in the

United States District Court for t he Middle District of Florida , Ta mpa

Division : U.S.A. v. Jose A. Rincon

- Martinez , Criminal No. : 13:CR: 00332

. b) C ounsel also have been preparing for a Suppression Hearing that is
currently scheduled for October 27 th , 2015 in the United States District Court

for the District of Puerto Rico : U. S. A. v. Enrique Colon

- Ville g a s , Criminal

No. 14

- 592 (DRD)

.

6. As a result, counsel has not had sufficient time to prepar e an adequate Petition

in this case.

7. This extension is not sought for purpose of delay.

WHEREFORE , PREMISES CONSIDERED, Petitioner prays that this Court
grant this Motion for Extension of Time to file Petitioner ’ s Petition for Discretionary

Revi e w

. 

### Respectfully submitted,

__ / s/ Octavio M. R i vera

- Bujosa

___ OCTAVIO M. RIVERA

- BUJOSA State Bar Number: 24081261 RIVERA Y BUJOSA LAW OFFIC E 333 Simonton Street Conroe, Texas 77301 Phone: ( 832) 296

- 6048 Fax : (9 36 ) 756

- 59613 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE



### This is to certify that copies of the above

- entitled and numbered petition for

review have been served on both the District Attorney of Harris County, Texas,
and the State Prosecuting Attorney, by delivery of a true copy to them on the 15 th



### day of October, 2015 , by electronic service

_ /s/ Octavio M. Rivera

- Bujosa

____ OCTAVIO M. RIVERA

- BUJOSA Attorney for P etitioner
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0896 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2010-SW-070-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Autec Associates, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"),
we, Arthur Garrison, as President/Chief Executive Officer and Luther Jefferies,
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Dated: August 18, 2003                    /s/ Arthur Garrison
                                          -------------------
                                          Arthur Garrison, President and Chief
                                          Executive Officer

Dated: August 18, 2003                    /s/ Luther Jefferies
                                          --------------------
                                          Luther Jefferies, Chief Financial
                                          Officer