alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1451 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Desmodur IL. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2005 

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Desmodur IL. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESMODUR IL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.09.03 A specific toluene 

diisocyanate homopolymer 

(CAS No. 26006–20–2) dissolved in organic solvents 

(provided for in subheading 

3911.90.45) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•S 1451 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
# L_2023100EN.01009901.xml

| 13.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 100/99 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 100/99

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/429 of 25 February 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 59 I of 25 February 2023
  )

On pages 373 to 422, in the Annex, in the table under the heading ‘Entities’, entries 175 to 208 are renumbered as entries 176 to 209.

---
# APICS Members tour DLA Distribution’s Eastern Distribution Center

/ Published Oct. 11, 2018
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
As part of their professional development, members of the American Production and Inventory Control Society visited DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, Oct. 1.

Over 20 members from the Central Pennsylvania APICS chapter received a DLA Distribution Overview and participated in a walking tour of the Eastern Distribution Center.

APICS is an association for supply chain management and a leading provider of research, education and certification programs that elevate supply chain excellence, innovation and resilience. 

During the walking tour through the EDC, the group saw various areas of operations in the warehouse; Receiving Operations and Processing; Storage, Retrieval and Sortation System which included the High Rise Storage and Active Item System; and Out loading Operations.

According to Bruce Spurgeon, president, APICS, Central Pennsylvania Chapter, his group takes a tour here every year.  Additionally, they hold three to five professional development meetings where they’ll host someone from DLA to come and provide a presentation.   

“We do have a combination of defense and commercial related people come and speak during our professional development meetings.  But, the benefits of coming here help us to understand the scope and scale of this. So it’s very beneficial for them (APICS Chapter members) to come and experience an operation of this size, from a military view-point,” stated Spurgeon.

It was the first tour here for Robert Neidigh, professor, Supply Chain Management Department, College of Business, Shippensburg University.

“I teach a quality course and the first thing I saw when walking towards the conference room was a big poster that said, “Quality Talks,” so it drives home what we’re teaching in our classes. Our main emphasis for us to get so many students in here is career opportunities – and the tour provides our students the ability to see the operation from a practical standpoint,” said Neidigh.

Melissa Meador, management analyst, DLA Distribution, briefed the group on the many career opportunities available to them at Distribution through the DLA Pathways to Career Excellence Program and other hiring programs. 

“I think it’s very important to at least to be able to give them the idea that there’s a place for them at DLA. However, the other side of this is to encourage managers and leadership here to utilize those programs,” said Meador.
#### Shannon SHIRLEY by her mother and guardian Dollie Shirley and Dollie Shirley, Individually, Appellants, v. ROPER BROTHERS, INC., National Beverages, Inc., Pepsico, Inc., and Insurance Company of North America, Appellees.

No. 77-883.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 9, 1978.

William A. Grimm of Troutman, Parrish & Weeks, P. A., Winter Park, for appellants.

Michael A. Estes of D’Aiuto, Walker & Buckmaster, Orlando, for appellees — Roper and INA.

W. David Rogers, Jr., of Rogers & Dowl-ing, Orlando, for appellees — National Beverages and Pepsico.

PER CURIAM.

Our consideration of the briefs and record leads us to the conclusion that no genuine issue of fact exists in this case and the trial court was correct in granting summary final judgment.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, C. J., and CROSS and LETTS, JJ., concur.
#### James ERB, Appellant, v. Patricia ERB, Appellee.

No. 69-130.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 2, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
§1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      on Form 10-Q of Terabeam, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), each of the undersigned Robert E. Fitzgerald, Chief Executive
      Officer, and Brian J. Sereda, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, of the
      Company certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002, that:





(1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or


15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/
                Robert E. Fitzgerald
            
            /s/
                Brian J. SeredaRobert
                E. Fitzgerald
            
            Brian
                J. SeredaChief
                Executive Officer
            
            Chief
                Financial Officer and TreasurerDate:  August
                14, 2007
            
            Date:  August
                14, 2007
No. 00-7002.

#### Organ *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I,
the undersigned officer of the Bellows Acquisition
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify to my
knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2006 of the Company fully complies, in all material
respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Report fairly represents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer

Date: May 11, 2006
#### ALLIED BONDING AGENCY, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida and Raymond Arthur McAbee, Appellees.

No. 77-600.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 9, 1978.

C. J. Collom of Cullom & Cullom, Orlando, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Basil S. Diamond and John D. Cecilian, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee-State of Florida.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

The trial court estreated the bond of a defendant who failed to appear and the appellant was required to forfeit the amount of the bond since it was the surety for the defendant. Within one year of the forfeiture the surety apprehended and surrendered the defendant to the court. The court readmitted the defendant to bail and a short time later the defendant was permitted to enter his plea of nolo contendere to the crime originally charged. When the bondsman went to the court to have the forfeited bond remitted this was denied even though Section 903.28, Florida Statutes (1975) says the court *shall*order the remission unless the delay has thwarted the proper prosecution of the defendant. *United Bonding Insurance Company v. State,*242 So.2d 140 (Fla. 1 DCA 1970); *Leach v. State,*293 So.2d 77, (Fla. 1 DCA 1974). The *247record discloses no evidence the delay, caused by the defendant’s having failed to appear, thwarted the proper prosecution of the defendant. Of course, any disappearance of a defendant delays and thereby somewhat thwarts prosecution but we cannot say every disappearance thwarts prosecution or the statute, Section 903.28, Florida Statutes (1975), would be rendered meaningless. That provision of the statute which provides remission of the forfeited bond is meant to reward a diligent surety for the return of the principal. *Leach, supra.*To disallow the remission would be to allow the diligent to go unrewarded and the lack of reward would surely lead to the thwarting of the prosecution because there would be no incentive to the surety.

The order denying the remission is reversed and this matter is remanded for entry of an order granting full remission of the bond to the surety.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

CROSS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Richard M. BROWN.

No. 61632.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 28, 1978.

Robert Zibilich, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Timothy W. Cerniglia, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Richard M. Brown was charged with second degree murder in violation of La.R.S. 14:30.1 and after trial by jury was found guilty as charged. Subsequently the trial court sentenced him to imprisonment for life without benefit of probation or parole. Defendant now appeals his conviction and sentence to this Court.

While we find no grounds for reversal of defendant’s conviction, we note ex proprio motu that the sentence imposed is illegal. La.C.Cr.P. art. 920(2). At the time of the commission of this offense on August 1, 1975, the appropriate penalty following a conviction for second degree murder was imprisonment at hard labor for life without eligibility for parole, probation or suspension of sentence *for*a *period of twenty (20) years.*La.R.S. 14:30.1, added by Acts 1973, No. 111, § 1. Accordingly, the case must be remanded for resentencing.

Defendant’s conviction is affirmed, but the sentence imposed is vacated and set aside, and the case is remanded to the district court with instructions to sentence the defendant in accordance with law.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Image Sensing System, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gregory R. L. Smith, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                         
| | ------------------------
| | /s/ Gregory
 R. L. Smith
| |                         
| | Gregory R.
 L. Smith    
| | Chief
 Financial Officer
| | March 26,
 2009         

56

---
MIRANDA GOLD CORP.

15381 – 36th Avenue

South Surrey, B.C. V3Z 0J5



Tel: (604) 417-4653

Fax: (604) 648-8706



----



Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Miranda
Gold Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Len Goldsmith, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Dated:	December 8, 2017





“signed” Len Goldsmith

______________________________________________

Len Goldsmith

Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### LIBERTY MUTUAL INS. CO. v. GRANT PARISH SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT et al.

No. 60969.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1977.

In re: Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the *236Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Grant. 350 So.2d 236.

Denied.

TATE, CALOGERO and DENNIS, JJ., are of the opinion the writ should be granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 176 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 176

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
             hydroelectric project in the State of Alaska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 
              PROJECT.

    Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 11480, the 
Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the project, and 
after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due 
diligence, and public interest requirements of that section and the 
Commission's procedures under that section extend the time period 
during which the licensee is required to commence the construction of 
the project for 3 consecutive 2-year periods beyond the date that is 4 
years after the date of issuance of the license.

            Passed the Senate July 26, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 176

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
             hydroelectric project in the State of Alaska.
```
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 167 (Thursday, August 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22960]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Ex Parte No. 552 (Sub-No. 1)]

Railroad Revenue Adequacy--1996 Determination

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 28, 1997, the Board served a decision announcing the 
1996 revenue adequacy determinations for the Nation's Class I 
railroads. Three carriers (Illinois Central Railroad Company, Norfolk 
Southern Railroad Company, and Soo Line Railroad Company) are found to 
be revenue adequate.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This decision is effective August 28, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leonard J. Blistein, (202) 565-1529. 
(TDD for the hearing impaired: (202) 565-1695.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board is required to make an annual 
determination of railroad revenue adequacy. A railroad will be 
considered revenue adequate under 49 U.S.C. 10704(a) if it achieves a 
rate of return on net investment equal to at least the current cost of 
capital for the railroad industry for 1996, determined to be 11.9% in 
Railroad Cost of Capital--1996, STB Ex Parte No. 558 (STB served July 
16, 1997). In this proceeding, the Board applied the revenue adequacy 
standards to each Class I railroad, and it found 3 carriers, Illinois 
Central Railroad Company, Norfolk Southern Railroad Company, and Soo 
Line Railroad Company, to be revenue adequate.
    Additional information is contained in the Board's formal decision. 
To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, call, or pick up in 
person from: DC NEWS & DATA, INC., Suite 210, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423. Telephone: (202) 289-4357. (Assistance for the 
hearing impaired is available through TDD services (202) 565-1695.)

Environmental and Energy Considerations

    This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the 
human environment or the conservation of energy resources.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 603(b), we conclude that our action in this 
proceeding will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities. The purpose and effect of the action is 
merely to update the annual railroad industry revenue adequacy finding. 
No new reporting or other regulatory requirements are imposed, directly 
or indirectly, on small entities.

    Decided: August 14, 1997.

    By the Board, Chairman Morgan and Vice Chairman Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22960 Filed 8-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
```
#### George R. CONNOLLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-121.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Sept. 24, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 20, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
name_Exh 104


		
			Exhibit 10.4
		

		
			 
		

		
			AMENDMENT NO. 3 OF 
		

		
			SENIOR UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE
		

		
			 
		

		
			THIS AMENDMENT NO. 3 (this “Amendment”) to the Senior Unsecured Promissory Note dated October 17, 2014, as amended (the "Note") is dated effective as of August 1, 2015, by and between Namecheap, Inc. (“Namecheap”), and Rightside Group, Ltd. (“Rightside”).  Unless otherwise expressly defined herein, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Note.  
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS, Namecheap issued the Note to Rightside in the original principal amount of $2,500,000 on October 17, 2014, as amended December 31, 2014 and July 1, 2015, in connection with that certain Registrar Agreement between Namecheap and eNom, Incorporated dated December 20, 2013; and
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS, Namecheap and Rightside wish to extend the Maturity Date.  
		

		
			 
		

		
			NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Namecheap and Rightside hereby agree as set forth below.
		

		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 1.
			

			
	
			
			The Maturity Date of the Note is hereby extended from July 31, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “New Maturity Date”).  




		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 2.
			

			
	
			
			Except as modified hereby, the Note shall remain in full force and effect.




		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 3.
			

			
	
			
			Each of Namecheap and Rightside represents and warrants to the other that it has the right, power and authority to enter into this Amendment.  




		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 4.
			

			
	
			
			This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be an original, and deemed to constitute one and the same instrument.  Signatures delivered by facsimile or PDF shall have the same force and effect as manual signatures delivered in person.  




		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			[Signature Page Follows]
		

		
			
		

		
			


		 


 


 
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused the foregoing Amendment to be signed by a duly authorized agent of each party, executed as of the day and year first above written.
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						NAMECHEAP, INC.

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						RIGHTSIDE GROUP, LTD. 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						By: 

					
					
						/s/ Richard Kirkendall

					
					
						 

					
					
						By: 

					
					
						/s/ Taryn Naidu

				
	
					
						Name:

					
					
						Richard Kirkendall

					
					
						 

					
					
						Name: 

					
					
						Taryn Naidu

				
	
					
						Title:

					
					
						CEO

					
					
						 

					
					
						Title:

					
					
						CEO