alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.15

 

THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE

EXTERRAN HOLDINGS, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

 

This Third Amendment to the Exterran Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (this “Third Amendment”), is made and adopted by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Exterran Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), effective as of the Effective Date (as defined below).

 

RECITALS

 

WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Exterran Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as amended from time to time, the “Plan”);

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 14 of the Plan, the Board has the authority to amend the Plan in any respect in its sole discretion;

 

WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the Company will spin-off Exterran Corporation, a Delaware corporation, into a new publicly-traded company (the “Spin-Off”);

 

WHEREAS, in connection with the Spin-Off, the Company will change its name to Archrock, Inc.; and

 

WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan in order to reflect the new name of the Company following the Spin-Off, effective as of the date of the consummation of the Spin-Off (the “Effective Date”).

 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is hereby amended as follows, subject to, and effective as of the Effective Date:

 

AMENDMENT

 

1.             Name of Plan.  The name of the Plan shall be amended to “Archrock, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan.”

 

2.             References.  All references in the Plan to (i) “Exterran Holdings, Inc.” shall be amended to refer to “Archrock, Inc.”, except with respect to Section 3(l) of the Plan, and (ii) “Exterran Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan” shall be amended to refer to “Archrock, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan.”

 

3.             General.  This Third Amendment shall be and hereby is incorporated into and forms a part of the Plan, and except as expressly provided herein, all terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

 

*              *              *

 











 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Third Amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of Exterran Holdings, Inc. on October 30, 2015.

 

Executed on this 3rd day of November, 2015.

 

 

	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   D. Bradley Childers
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
D.   Bradley Childers
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
President
    


 

Signature Page to Third Amendment to the

Exterran Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 17, 2014

No. 04

- 14

- 00718

- CV

IN RE Leticia R. BENAVIDES

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

On Oc tober 16, 2014, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency

motion for stay of a December trial setting in the underlying divorce proceeding. This court is of

the opinion that a serious question concerning the manda mus relief sought requires further

consideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real parties in interest

may file a response to the petition in this court no later than October 31, 2014. Any such

response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.

Relator’s emergency motion for stay remains pending before this court.

It is so ORDERED on October 17 th , 2014. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2012CVG001995

- C3, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of Carlos Y.

Benavides Jr. and Leticia R. Benavides , pending in the County Court at Law No 2, Webb County, Texas, the

Honorable Jesus Garza presiding.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly Report of GL Energy and Exploration, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated: August 22, 2005

/s/ David Michery

Name: David Michery

Title:  Chief Executive Officer



Dated:  August 22, 2005

/s/ Kent Puckett

Name: Kent Puckett

Title:  Chief Financial Officer
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1677 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 

deduction for college tuition expenses and to expand such deduction 

to include expenses for books. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently 

extend the deduction for college tuition expenses and 

to expand such deduction to include expenses for books.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF TUITION DEDUC4 TION AND EXPANSION TO INCLUDE COLLEGE 

5 BOOK EXPENSES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 222(b)(2) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to applicable dollar limit) 

8 is amended by striking subparagraphs (A) and (B) and 

9 inserting the following new subparagraphs: 
2

•S 1677 IS

1 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The applicable dollar 

2 amount with respect to qualified tuition and re3 lated expenses described in subsection 

4 (d)(1)(A)(i) shall be equal to— 

5 ‘‘(i) in the case of a taxpayer whose 

6 adjusted gross income for the taxable year 

7 does not exceed $65,000 ($130,000 in the 

8 case of a joint return), $4,000, 

9 ‘‘(ii) in the case of a taxpayer whose 

10 adjusted gross income for the taxable year 

11 does not exceed $80,000 ($160,000 in the 

12 case of a joint return), $2,000, and 

13 ‘‘(iii) in the case of any other tax14 payer, zero. 

15 ‘‘(B) BOOKS.—The applicable dollar 

16 amount with respect to qualified tuition and re17 lated expenses described in subsection 

18 (d)(1)(A)(ii) shall be equal to— 

19 ‘‘(i) in the case of a taxpayer whose 

20 adjusted gross income for the taxable year 

21 does not exceed $65,000 ($130,000 in the 

22 case of a joint return), $1,000, 

23 ‘‘(ii) in the case of a taxpayer whose 

24 adjusted gross income for the taxable year 
3

•S 1677 IS

1 does not exceed $80,000 ($160,000 in the 

2 case of a joint return), $500, and 

3 ‘‘(iii) in the case of any other tax4 payer, zero.’’. 

5 (b) EXPANSION OF RELATED EXPENSES.—Para6 graph (1) of section 222(d) of the Internal Revenue Code 

7 of 1986 (relating to definitions and special rules) is 

8 amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(1) QUALIFIED TUITION AND RELATED EX10 PENSES.— 

11 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘qualified 

12 tuition and related expenses’— 

13 ‘‘(i) has the meaning given such term 

14 by section 25(f), and 

15 ‘‘(ii) includes books (within the mean16 ing of section 529(e)(3)(A)(i)). 

17 ‘‘(B) SPECIAL RULE.—Such expenses shall 

18 be reduced in the same manner as under sec19 tion 25A(g)(2).’’. 

20 (c) DEDUCTION MADE PERMANENT.—Section 222 of 

21 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

22 subsection (e). 
4

•S 1677 IS

1 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to payments made in taxable years 

3 beginning after December 31, 2005.

Æ
Office of Highway Safety

Highway Fac

Highway Fac

David Rayburn
Summary of Highway F

Summary of Highway F

• General Highway Infor• Highway Design• Accident History• Traffic Control Devices
General Highway Infor

General Highway Infor

• Average traffic speed 70 mph• Design speed 60 mph• Posted speed limit 55 mph • Motorcoach traveling 65 mph• Average daily traffic3⁄4 I-75 was 95,920 vehicles3⁄4 HOV lane was 6,825 vehicles3⁄4 HOV ramp was 500 vehicles
I-75 Design Informa

I-75 Design Informa

• Reconstructed 1982• Four lanes and full-time HO

each direction

• HOV lanes separated from 

use lanes by double line pamarkings (solid and dashed

• HOV left-side exit ramps op

conventional ramps until 19
Exit Ramp Characteris

Exit Ramp Characteri

• Left-side exit ramp• First left HOV exit along I-• Approaching the accident 

roadway curves to the left 

• Driver’s view obstructed• Exit ramp is short
Exit Ramp Accident Hi

Exit Ramp Accident H

• 9 accidents between 1997 • 3 were fatal• 6 of 9 involved single vehic• Of the 6 single-vehicle acc

occurred at night

• None of the drivers were fr

Atlanta area
Conventional Left E

Conventional Left E
I-75 HOV Lane Separa

I-75 HOV Lane Separ
MUTCD Compliance Req

MUTCD Compliance Req

• Traffic Control Devices (TC

comply with the Manual on Traffic Control Devices

• TCDs include signs, signals

pavement markings

• The MUTCD provides: 

Standards Guidance Options
Guide Signs for the HO

Guide Signs for the HO

Exit 1 mileExit 1⁄2 mileExit arrowExit gore sign
Traffic Control Dev

Traffic Control Dev
Traffic Control Devic

Traffic Control Devic
Traffic Control Devic

Traffic Control Devic

Traffic Control Devices o

Traffic Control Devices o
Postaccident Chan

Postaccident Chan
Stop Sign Beacon Ad

Stop Sign Beacon Ad
Pavement Marking

Pavement Marking

• Guide line markings across 

can help minimize errant d

• FHWA recommends white 

pavement markings in tape

• “Exit” or “Exit Only” pavem

can also be used on ramps
Needed Improveme

Needed Improveme

• Left EXIT plaques on guide 

and implement within 5 yea

• Left exit direction (arrow) si

with pull-through sign 

• Advisory speed limit signs o• Exit pavement markings• Uniform guidance in the MU
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PCS Edventures!.com, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), I, Robert O. Grover, Chief Executive Officer and of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| Date: 

August 20, 2012

  

By: 

/s/Robert O. Grover

  

  

  

  

Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Order entered April 20, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00273-CV

TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY, L.L.P., Appellant

V.

ANGELA M. CARPENTER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. Dc-17-04230

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this accelerated appeal is overdue. By postcard dated March 21, 

2018, we notified Court Reporter Vielica Dobbins the reporter’s record was overdue. We 

directed Ms. Dobbins to file the reporter’s record within ten days. To date, the reporter’s record 

has not been filed. 

Accordingly, we ORDER Vielica Dobbins, Official Court Reporter for the 134th Judicial 

District Court, to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order either (1) the reporter’s record; 

(2) written verification no hearings were recorded; or (3) written verification that appellant has

paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record.1 We notify appellant that if we receive 

 

1 The docketing sheet filed by appellant in this case indicates the reporter’s record was requested on March 9, 2018 and 

that payment arrangements were made.
verification the reporter’s record has not been requested or that it has not been paid for, we may

order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c). 

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to:

Honorable Dale Tillery 

Presiding Judge

134th Judicial District Court

Vielica Dobbins

Official Court Reporter

134th Judicial District Court

All parties 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofsection 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersignedofficer of NeoPharm, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), doeshereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “10-K Report”) that:

(1)         the10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         the information containedin the 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: March 16, 2007 |   | /s/ RONALD E.  PAULI      |   |   |
|----------------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|--------|
|                       |   | Ronald E. Pauli,          |   |   |
|                       |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |   |   |

----

*       Thiscertification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of thatsection, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filingunder the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

----
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT - 32

                                  COMPANY NAME

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alternate Energy
Corporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Blaine Froats, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition, results of
                  operations, and cash flows of the Company.


/s/ Blaine Froats
--------------------------------
    Blaine Froats
    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
    November 14, 2003
Exhibit 32.1


                        VIEW SYSTEMS, INC.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

     I, Gunther Than, Chief  Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
of View Systems, Inc. certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(A)  the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
     September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(B)  the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.



Date:  November 13, 2003                   /s/ Gunther Than
                                           ________________________________
                                           Gunther Than
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 99




Release Date:                                        Further Information:

IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                    David J. Bursic
January 28, 2009                                     President and
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                              -or-
                                                     Pamela M. Gregio
                                                     Investor Relations
                                                     Phone: (412) 364-1913


                        WVS FINANCIAL CORP. TO REPURCHASE
                      UP TO 106,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK

         PITTSBURGH,   PENNSYLVANIA--WVS  Financial  Corp.  (NASDAQ:WVFC),   the
holding  company for West View Savings Bank,  announced today that the Company's
Board of Directors  authorized  its Tenth Stock  Repurchase  Program.  The Tenth
Stock Repurchase  Program will total 106,000 shares,  or approximately  5.00% of
the 2,122,185  shares expected to be outstanding  upon completion of the current
Ninth Stock Repurchase Program, and will commence upon completion of the current
repurchase  program.  As  of  January  27,  2009,  3,100  shares  remain  to  be
repurchased  under the current  program as the Company has  repurchased  161,900
shares.

         Repurchases  are authorized to be made by the Company from time to time
in open-market transactions as, in the opinion of management,  market conditions
warrant.  The  repurchased  shares  will be held as  treasury  stock  and may be
reserved for issuance pursuant to the Company's stock benefit plans.

         WVS Financial Corp.  owns 100% of the outstanding  common stock of West
View Savings Bank.  The Savings Bank is a  Pennsylvania-chartered,  FDIC-insured
savings bank which  conducts  business in the North Hills suburbs of Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania.

                                      # # #



                                  Page 4 of 4
# Distribution tests out wireless technology

/ Published Oct. 26, 2018
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Warehouse modernization is necessary in the logistics business. In order for the Defense Logistics Agency Distribution network to keep up with the Amazon’s of the world and remain cost effective, modern technologies must be introduced into the mix. Two such items have recently been introduced into DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania’s Eastern Distribution Center: wireless tablets and printers.

Working with Distribution’s Future Operations directorate, Distribution’s Information Operations deployed wireless tablets and printers to test sites across the Distribution network. The purpose of the test was to identify, prioritize, procure and test technologies in warehouse operations, outside storage and remote locations.

Mobile technology can increase efficiency, improve accuracy and reduce the issue and resolution loop. The need for tablets in a warehouse environment is to ensure full functionality, durability and usage.

Susquehanna’s tablets and printers were initially placed in Safety, Quality Assurance, Stock Readiness and Denials. After two 10 week evaluations done in the areas of Re-Warehousing and Stock Readiness, the technology proved to be effective and efficient.  

During the initial assessment, efficiencies were noted and volunteers selected, trained and asked to submit survey forms on a weekly basis of the functionality and durability of the tablet and printer. 

Once the assessment was completed, Distribution Headquarters conducted a return on investment. 

Testers discovered a wealth of advantages to the tablets and printers during the testing period. The mobile printers were designed to allow process workers to print labels on location during the processing of materials. They found these technologies reduced travel time, improved end-to-end process time and enabled process completion in one location. 

On the technical side, the compatibility between the tablets, printers and scanners as well as the sustainable battery life assisted with the processing time. Additionally, they found the tablets to be lightweight and durable, while the printers printed labels in record time. 

Overall, the same results for percentage of improvements that were observed at DLA Distribution Susquehanna can be expected to be seen across the network.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7385

BRUCE ALTON ROGERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

R. M. JARVIS; HERMAN C. WILSON, JR.; NORTH

CAROLINA PAROLE COMMISSION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CA-97-584-5-BO2)

Submitted: December 18, 1997 Decided: January 7, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce Alton Rogers, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, dismissing the action because it failed to state a claim upon which

relief could be granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp.

1997), and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for judicial notice and affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. Rogers v. Jarvis, No. CA-97-584-5-B02 (E.D.N.C.

Sept. 15, 1997). To the extent that the district court did not

expressly address Appellant’s claims for damages, we find that the

claims are meritless. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
No. 9608.

#### The Youngstown Steel Co. *v.*Domer, Guardian.

(Decided April 24, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Mahoning county.

*Mr. T. H. Gillmer*and *Messrs. Seaton <3 Paine,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. W. S. Anderson*and *Mr. W. PL. Woolf,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers and Spear, J J., concur.