alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
99–008 

112TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 112–185 

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII 

WITH RESPECT TO CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED FROM THE COMMITTEE ON RULES 

JULY 28, 2011.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 382] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 382, by a record vote of 8 to 4, report the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives the requirement of clause 6(a) of Rule 

XIII, requiring a two-thirds vote to consider a rule on the same day 

it is reported from the Rules Committee, for any resolution reported from the Rules Committee through the legislative day of August 2, 2011. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 124 

Motion by Mr. Sessions to report the rule. Adopted: 8–4 

Majority Members Vote Minority Members Vote 

Mr. Sessions ..................................................... Yea Ms. Slaughter .................................................. Nay 

Ms. Foxx ............................................................ Yea Mr. McGovern ................................................... Nay 

Mr. Bishop of Utah .......................................... Yea Mr. Hastings of Florida ................................... Nay 

Mr. Woodall ...................................................... Yea Mr. Polis ........................................................... Nay 

Mr. Nugent ....................................................... Yea 

Mr. Scott of South Carolina ............................. Yea 

Mr. Webster ...................................................... Yea 

Mr. Dreier, Chairman ....................................... Yea 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with HEARING
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23159]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-73-000]


Ozark Gas Transmission System; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

August 26, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 20, 1997, Ozark Gas Transmission System 
(Ozark) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet, with a 
proposed effective date of October 1, 1997:

Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 4

    Ozark states that it is amending its transmission rate schedules to 
reflect the Commission proscribed Annual Charge Adjustment unit charge 
of $.0021 per Dekatherm. Ozark states that this is a $.0001 increase 
from the currently effective ACA unit charge. Ozark states that its 
filing is submitted pursuant to Section 154.402 of the Commission's 
Regulations and Section 11 of the General Terms and Conditions of 
Ozark's FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1.
    Ozark states that copies of this filing were served on Ozarks 
jurisdictional customers.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken but will 
not serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and area available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23159 Filed 8-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1785 Referred in House (RFH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1785

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 2005

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend chapter 13 of title 17, United States Code (relating to the 
 vessel hull design protection), to clarify the distinction between a 
   hull and a deck, to provide factors for the determination of the 
protectability of a revised design, to provide guidance for assessments 
           of substantial similarity, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Vessel Hull Design Protection 
Amendments of 2005''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNS PROTECTED.

    Section 1301(a) of title 17, United States Code, is amended by 
striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:
            ``(2) Vessel features.--The design of a vessel hull or 
        deck, including a plug or mold, is subject to protection under 
        this chapter, notwithstanding section 1302(4).''.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    Section 1301(b) of title 17, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``vessel hull, including 
        a plug or mold,'' and inserting ``vessel hull or deck, 
        including a plug or mold,'';
            (2) by striking paragraph (4) and inserting the following:
            ``(4) A `hull' is the exterior frame or body of a vessel, 
        exclusive of the deck, superstructure, masts, sails, yards, 
        rigging, hardware, fixtures, and other attachments.''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) A `deck' is the horizontal surface of a vessel that 
        covers the hull, including exterior cabin and cockpit surfaces, 
        and exclusive of masts, sails, yards, rigging, hardware, 
        fixtures, and other attachments.''.

            Passed the Senate November 18, 2005.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
Exhibit 99.1

                                  TEN STIX INC.
                      Table Games for the Gaming Industry
                  P.O. Box 699, Idaho Springs, Colorado 80452
                      303-567-0163 Email: tenstix@att.net
                                www.tenstix.com



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the six-month
period ended June 30, 2002 of Ten Stix Inc., a Colorado corporation (the
"Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), we, Thomas E. Sawyer, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Tony A. Cranford, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
     Company.


                                            /s/  Thomas E. Sawyer
                                            ----------------------------------
                                                 Thomas E. Sawyer, President and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

                                            /s/  Tony A. Cranford
                                            ----------------------------------
                                                 Tony A. Cranford, Treasurer and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

                                            August 23, 2002
#### Barbara LUTZ, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 69-139.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District

June 26, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
#### Elizabeth DEVLYN, d/b/a the “Spot Restaurant”, Appellant, v. Stanley J. BOMSTEIN, P. A., d/b/a “American International Business Brokers”, Appellee.

No. 76-2228.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 17, 1978.

Vincent Meade, Jr., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

*405No appearance for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

The trial court entered Judgment on the pleadings. We reverse.

Plaintiff alleges in her complaint that she is the owner of a restaurant and that she contracted with Stanley J. Bom-stein, P.A., doing business as American International Business Brokers, to have the brokers obtain a buyer for her restaurant. She alleges Trudy Temple gave the brokers a written offer to purchase the restaurant and the brokers negligently failed to deliver the offer to her in time for her to accept it. There is no allegation the plaintiff was injured by this negligence unless we go to a previous court in the complaint where she sued the broker’s salesman for his negligence (by the same acts) where it is alleged she was injured. But the previous count *attempts*to sue the salesman individually, even though it alleges he was acting “as a salesman for American International Business Brokers.” Therefore we take it as an allegation against the brokers, American International Business Brokers.

As can be seen, it is a most clumsily drawn complaint and that circumstance is aggravated by the Appellee not favoring us with a brief. Without the assistance of counsel our job is made much more difficult, and if it becomes a regular occurrence then our function could be so impaired as to be nigh impossible.

The complaint was met by the following answer by Bomstein:

> “1. Defendant denies the allegations of paragraph 12 and demands strict proof thereof.

> “2. Defendant admits the allegations of paragraph 12 and 14.”

As to paragraph 12 — does he admit or deny? In order to do equal justice for both parties we determine he denies the allegations of paragraph 12. Defendant goes on to deny the rest of the allegations and alleges an “affirmative defense” that the plaintiff’s attorney failed to convey the offer to plaintiff after he learned of it from defendant. Defendant does not allege what type of affirmative defense this is under the rules, if any. See Rule 1.110(d), Fla.R.Civ.P.

Quite reluctantly, we reverse the Judgment on the pleadings and remand the matter for further proceedings consistent herewith. *Wittington Condominium Apts., Inc. v. Braemar Corp.,*313 So.2d 463 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

CROSS and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1   View Systems, Inc.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of View Systems, Inc. certifies (the “Company”) pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  (A) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (B) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date: March 23, 2007 /s/ Gunther Than Gunther Than Chief Executive Officer Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Investco, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the nine months ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Arnold
Salinas, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/Arnold Salinas
----------------------------
Arnold Salinas
Chief Executive and
Principal Accounting Officer
April 20, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**China: International Agricultural Trade (90019)**
EXHIBIT 11


                      PACE HEALTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC.

                         EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATION

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Years Ended December 31
                                             ------------------------------------------------------
                                                   1997              1996                1995
                                             ----------------    ---------------    ---------------
<S>                                               <C>                 <C>                <C>
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding.                                      5,402,895           4,506,166          3,091,560

Net loss available for common and common
equivalent shares                             $  (5,678,215)      $  (4,780,191)     $  (2,412,488)

Basic and diluted loss per share              $       (1.06)      $       (1.06)     $       (0.78)

</TABLE>
UNITED
STATES


SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington,
D.C.  20549








FORM
8-K





CURRENT
REPORT





Pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities
Exchange Act of 1934








Date
      of Report (date of earliest event reported):
            May
      23, 2008








PROXIM
      WIRELESS CORPORATION(Exact
      name of registrant as specified in its
charter)








Delaware
            000-29053
            04-2751645(State
      or other jurisdiction of
              incorporation)
            (Commission
      file number)
            (IRS
      employer identification no.)








2115
      O’Nel Drive, San Jose, CA
            95131(Address
      of principal executive offices)
            (Zip
      code)








Registrant’s
      telephone number, including area code:
            (408)
      731-2700





Not
      Applicable(Former
      name or former address, if changed since last
  report)








Check the
appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):




o  Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
230.425)




o  Soliciting
material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14a-12)




o  Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))




o  Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))











Item
8.01  Other
Events.
 
 On May
23, 2008, Terabeam Corporation, a subsidiary of Proxim Wireless Corporation,
sold selected patents and patent applications to Pertex Telecommunication LLC
for net proceeds of approximately $850,000.  The patents and patent
applications sold relate to Terabeam’s free space optics
technology.  Proxim and Terabeam retain a worldwide, non-exclusive
license under the transferred patents and patent applications.
 
 Proxim
acquired these patents and patent applications through the acquisition of
Terabeam Corporation in June 2004.  Since the acquisition, Proxim
Wireless has seen greater demand for its radio products as a solution for
high-bandwidth connectivity and only limited demand for free space optics
products and thus decided to monetize this free space optics
technology.
 
 SIGNATURE
 
 Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
duly authorized.


PROXIM
      WIRELESS CORPORATIONDated:
      May 30, 2008
            By:
            /s/ David
      L. RenauldDavid
      L. RenauldVice
      President









2
[The header and web page search is in an undisplayed frame - follow this link to view it] REAL TIME IONOGRAMS
                animated .gif image of real time ionogram**IONOGRAMS WITH SCALED CHARACTERISTICS(Mostly Lowell Sounders)**DourbesAthens /
                                Chilton /
                                LerwickPruhonice /
                                Gibilmanna /
                                Juliusruh
                        **IONOGRAMS WITHOUT SCALED CHARACTERISTICS**Tromso Uppsala /
                                Kiruna /
                                LyckseleChristchurch /
                                Sydney /
                                Warsaw**Jicamarca Ionogram data plots**
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN TEXAS 78711

©FF8G0AL BUSINESS ---«**»«*&¥*» <? ^

STATE ©F T

-PENALTY FOR

1/14/2015 PRIVATE USE

BOWIE, ELLE UNTA

.AMRS3B ?SSSi

: sg

• „ ncSS

Tr. Gt.lNo.,l5?3282?Ai!

02 1R

0002003152 JAN15 2015

MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 78 701

t. • • . . . A1_ . WR-82,451-01 This is to advise that the Court has^denied without written order the application for

writ of habeas corpus on the findings^ the trial'court without a hearing.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

ELLE UNTA BOWIE

NEY UNIT - TDC # 1793227

114PRIVATE ROAD 4303

HONDO,'TX 78861-3812 ' UTF

H'H-,irlini'H',M,,u'''lh'il'iillli[|'H|||i|l'i|i'i!M'i
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Adolor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen W. Webster, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 29, 2011                                      
|                                                          
|/s/    Stephen W. Webster                                 
|Stephen W. Webster                                        
|Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Our area in west Fort Worth, Texas is surrounded by gas wells and another one is 

being drilled 300 yards from our house. We hear the workers talking all hours of the 

night. 

 

Will there be regular tests of the air quality in our area or will we be forgotten? 

My husband and I are both in our 80's and we are already having breathing 

problems. There are many children in the neighborhood who like to 

play outside. What about them? 

 

Liz Reese 

10101 Paint Pony Trail 

Fort Worth, TX 76108 

 

817-246-1112

Air pollutants -- we are surrounded by gas wells

Winifred Reese 

to: 

Nick Parsons 

08/02/2010 01:40 PM 

Show Details 

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\nparsons\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web4910.h... 8/9/2010
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 168 

To reauthorize additional contract authority for States with Indian 

reservations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2005 

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself and Mr. BENNETT) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL

To reauthorize additional contract authority for States with 

Indian reservations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Indian School Bus 

5 Route Safety Reauthorization Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL CONTRACT AU7 THORITY FOR STATES WITH INDIAN RES8 ERVATIONS. 

9 Section 1214(d)(5)(A) of the Transportation Equity 

10 Act for the 21st Century (23 U.S.C. 202 note; 112 Stat. 
2

•S 168 IS

1 206) is amended by striking ‘‘$1,500,000 for each of fiscal 

2 years 1998 through 2003’’ and inserting ‘‘$1,800,000 for 

3 each of fiscal years 2005 through 2010’’.

Æ
**Exhibit
      32.2**


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the quarterly report of Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jon R.
      Ansari, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(2)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(3)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.











Date:
      February 8, 2007





/s/
      Jon R. Ansari


Jon
      R.
      Ansari


Senior
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer








17