alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 163 (Friday, August 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44699-44700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22285]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    Title: Notice of Lien.
    OMB No.: 0970-0153.
    Description: Section 324 of PRWORA '96 (Pub. L. 104-193), requires 
DHHS to promulgate a standard lien form for use by the State CSE 
programs to secure delinquent child support obligations in interstate 
cases.
    Respondents: States.

[[Page 44700]]



                                             Annual Burden Estimates                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                          Number of                             
                                                            Number of     responses      Average    Total burden
                       Instrument                          respondents       per      burden hours      hours   
                                                                         respondent   per response              
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lien....................................................       53,254             1          0.25        13,313 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 13,313.
    Additional Information:  Copies of the proposed collection may be 
obtained by writing to The Administration for Children and Families, 
Office of Information Services, Division of Information Resource 
Management Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447, 
Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer.
    OMB Comment: OMB is required to make a decision concerning the 
collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of 
this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best 
assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of 
publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office 
of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, 725 17th Street, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20503, Attn: Ms. Wendy Taylor.

    Dated: August 18, 1997.
Bob Sargis,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-22285 Filed 8-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22816]



[[Page 45397]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration
[A-583-008]


Stainless Steel Plate From Sweden Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; Time Limits

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of extension of time limits.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is extending the 
time limit for the final results of the review of the antidumping 
finding on stainless steel plate from Sweden. The review covers two 
manufacturers/exporters of the subject merchandise to the United States 
and the period June 1, 1995 through May 31, 1996.
    Prior to the extension of the time limit, the deadline for making a 
final determination was November 5, 1997. The Department has 
determined, however, that it is not practicable to complete the review 
within the foregoing time limit. Therefore, in accordance with Section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, the Department is 
extending the time limit and the new deadline for making a final 
determination is January 5, 1998.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 27, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Heaney or Linda Ludwig, 
Office of AD/CVD Enforcement, Group III, Import Administration, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: 
(202) 482-4475 or 482-0649, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Because it is not practicable to complete this review within the 
time limits mandated by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (120 days from 
publication of the preliminary results of review), pursuant to Section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, the Department is 
extending the time limit for completion of the final results until 
January 5, 1998. See Decision Memorandum to Robert S. LaRussa dated 
August 14, 1997.
    This extension is in accordance with section 751(a) (3) (A) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(3)(A)).

    Dated: August 19, 1997.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Enforcement Group III.
[FR Doc. 97-22816 Filed 8-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
Exhibit 23.1



                  INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
                  -----------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February
11, 1997, on the financial statements as of December 31, 1996 and for the
year then ended, included this Form 10-K of 1MAGE Software, Inc. which
appears on page 15, into the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No.
333-35625) and Forms S-8 (File Nos. 33-78096, 33-86760 & 333-30787) for
1MAGE Software, Inc.

We also consent to the restatement of net loss and accumulated deficit as
of December 31, 1996 as discussed in Note 11 of the financial statements.


/s/ Karsh & Company, P.C.
-------------------------

Karsh & Company, P.C.

Denver, Colorado
March 30, 1999
----- -_.- - -

NEILABERCROMBIE ~Of"'W.IJI 

## -'.

- ~:~,'.RW.E\~T OF .;'. :~bO' R-TI.T'I-O}l -'1,,1 11'\1 

## NS



## .::;/0 OPERfJlOI En ;:DV\3 A \0: 

## 55 lORrnAJ. ruDDY. A.C.5.W.•M.P.H.

0lRfC10Aort£Ali~
.

October 23, 2013 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH P. O. BOX4444 KALAUPAPA, HI 96742

KevinD.Schlemmer, Chief Essential AirService & Domestic Analysis Division U.S.Department ofTransportation



## '" 1200 NewJerseys Ave, SE 

## J Washington, DC20590 ' Dear Mr. Schlemmer: The Federal Aviation Administration has advertised for an Essential Air Service (EAS) provider for service to and from Kalaupapa Settlement on the Island ofMolokai in Hawaii, Order 2013- 10-3 for service beginning January 14,2013. EAS has provided the opportunity for Kalaupapa residents and visitors to travel to and from the Settlement. The economy the EAS has brought to the price oftickets has been essential to connect the ageing patient population and growing support population with the outside world and to bring -gueststothis very significant historical ahd religious Hawaiian site. Makani Kai has provided superior service to the Kalaupapa Settlement forthe past 2 years. Makani Kai worked closely \Viththe community to provide optimum service and allowed a resident rate fortravel that has allowed and encourage connection to both topside Molokai and Honolulu. Both locations are vital links to medical services, normal government services and other shopping and entertainment activities. Previously, FAkhas awarded this EAS route to Pacific Wings since they said they would provide EAS atno extra cost to the government. Their service was adisaster for Kalaupapa, and basically was aploy to gain access to the service that ",;thin short order raised prices by from $30 to $503 dollars for around trip to Honolulu. No one could afford to travel under that tyranny and EAS service was severely degraded. Makani Kai has provided EAS service to Kalaupapa with a subsidy, but they have maintained and exceeded all their promises to provide affordable services and this has brought trip numbers back to pre-Pacific Wings levels as the EAS is expected to provide. Makani Kai has done everything they promised and done sovery well forresidents and visitors to Kalaupapa.Please give your most serious consideration to their tine record operating under the EAS and

award the new contract to them forthe foreseeable future. 

### Itis imperative for the health and welfare ofthis community that you do soto provide long term security to this community for access to and from Kalaupapa Settlement. Sincerely,

Mark Miller Administrator Kalaupapa Settlement And attached 27 residents (Note

- during furlough, NPS employees were not here to sign under this letter)

# 1

-- - ~-."'~.--

..

### -- ---"

Essential AirSenice Letter ofSupport October 15,2013 The following people live and work/volunteer in Kalaupapa Settlement and support the continuation ofMakani Kai as the Essential Air Service carrier for Kalaupapa:

_'_-> ,:('c 

## ) If.- ~~ 

# cD)lLU

# tAr h"CC 

# be,\! ~~M~{l 

# 7, \'~1\;,---,

!\. 

# -h\.) \rJt"--''{~ 

# PCC;,yk ~r

(;~4._/~_r ,,;'i 

# ~h;--:> 

# J ;/lief}.)
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER



In connection with
the quarterly report of Global Food Technologies, Inc. ("Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates
indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to their
knowledge:



1.          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Dated May 14, 2014



|/s/ Keith Meeks                                    | 
|-------------------------------------------------- | 
|Keith Meeks, President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|                                                   | 
|/s/ Marshall F Sparks                              | 
|Marshall F. Sparks, Chief Financial Officer        |
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of T. C., a Child

In the Interest of T.L.C., a Child

Appellate case number: 01-17-00497-CV

01-17-00498-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-71072

2011-08360

Trial court: 309th District Court of Harris County

These appeals involve termination and child-protection cases. On January 22, 

2018, appellee, Department of Family & Protective Service (“DFPS”), filed an 

unopposed motion for an extension of time to February 12, 2018 to file its appellee’s 

brief. We grant the motion. DFPS’s brief is due to be filed in these appeals no later 

than Monday, February 12, 2018. No further extensions will be granted. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 28.4(a), 38.6(b), (c).

Further, in Cause No. 01-17-00498-CV, the brief of appellee T.L.C. aka 

T.L.C. is due to be filed no later than Monday, February 12, 2018. No further 

extensions will be granted.

Because these appeals involve termination and child-protection cases, this Court is 

required to bring the appeals to final disposition within 180 days of June 30, 2017, the 

date the notices of appeal were filed, so far as reasonably possible. See Tex. R. Jud. 

Admin. 6.2, reprinted in TEX. GOV’T. CODE ANN., tit. 2, subtit. F app. (Vernon Supp. 

2017).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 25, 2018
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Climatechange vulnerability and adaptation in the Intermountain Region**
 
Volumes: One | Two
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.88:RMRS-GTR-375/PT.1-2
Item Number:0083-B-06 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001064762
 
August 23, 2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

881 

CA 13-00880 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND LINDLEY, JJ. 

 

 

MARCIA ALLEN, PLAINTIFF, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WAL-MART STORES, INC., DEFENDANT. 

(ACTION NO. 1.) 

----------------------------------------------- 

MARCIA ALLEN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V

 

WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

(ACTION NO. 2.) 

 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

MELVIN BRESSLER, ROCHESTER, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

BROWN HUTCHINSON LLP, ROCHESTER (R. ANDREW FEINBERG OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Evelyn

Frazee, J.), entered July 30, 2012. The order granted the motion of

defendant to strike the complaint and dismiss action No. 2 pursuant to

CPLR 3126. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Allen v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ([appeal No.

1], ___ AD3d ___ [Oct. 3, 2014]).

Entered: October 3, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.10
 CERTIFICATION
REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND
SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
   1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/  Bruce G. WatermanBruce G. WatermanSenior Vice President, Finance &
Chief Financial Officer
Chickasaw

National Wildlife Refuge

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Refuge Facts

■ Established: 1985.

■ Acres: 24,096.

■ Located in Lauderdale County, TN.

■ Location: the refuge

headquarters is located 9 miles

north of Ripley (Highway 51) on

Edith Nankipoo road, then left on

Hobe Webb Road 1.25 miles, then

right on Sand Bluff Road .5 mile.

Natural History

■ Refuge occupies land that was

once owned by a private timber

company (Anderson-Tully Inc.)

and then a Tennessee Wildlife

Resources Agency Wildlife

Management Area.

■ Refuge lies in the floodplain of

the Mississippi River.

■ Concentrations of ducks, geese,

raptors, shorebirds, wading

birds, and neotropical migrants.

■ Currently two active bald eagle

nests.

■ Habitat acreage:

Bottomland hardwood forest:

21,221

Cropland: 1,227

Open Water: 325

Grassland-Scrub/Shrub: 500

Upland Forest: 550

Financial Impact of Refuge

■ Three-person staff.

■ 130,000 visitors annually.

■ Base funding is from West

Tennessee NWR Complex budget

FY 05 $1,916,000.

Refuge Objectives

■ Protect, enhance, and manage

habitat for migratory birds and

endangered species.

■ Maintain and enhance

bottomland hardwood forest.

■ Restore and enhance the hydrology

of the refuge’s watershed.

■ Provide compatible consumptive

and non-consumptive

opportunities for public use.

Management Tools

■ Water management for

waterfowl, shorebirds, and

wading birds.

■ Cooperative farming.

■ Mechanical/chemical control of

noxious weeds.

■ Silvicultural techniques for

resident and migratory wildlife.

■ Education/interpretation.

■ Law enforcement.

■ Cooperative partnerships.

■ Sanctuary for waterfowl.

Public Use Opportunities

■ Hunting, including youth hunts.

■ Fishing year-round in Mississippi

and Forked Deer Rivers, and four

small lakes.

■ 20 miles of gravel/paved roads for

refuge access.

■ Logging trails for hiking/hunter

access.

■ Wildlife observation.

■ Photography.

Calendar of Events

March-June: crappie and bass fishing

peak; wildflowers are abundant;

northern snowmelt swells Mississippi

River; birds migrating north; excellent

wildlife viewing opportunities.

July-September: catfishing still good;

habitat management programs busy;

heat, humidity, and bugs can be

extreme.

September-December: squirrel

hunting begins; other hunts follow

through end of year; National

Wildlife Refuge Week in October,

excellent wildlife viewing

opportunities.

January-March: small-MississippiRiver rises can inundate refuge;

hunting closes end of February;

wintering waterfowl use peaks.

Randy Cook, Refuge Manager

Chickasaw NWR

1505 Sand Bluff Road

Ripley, TN 38063

Refuge phone: 731/635 7621

Administration office: 731/287 0650

Fax: 731/286 0468

E-mail: FW4RWChickasaw@fws.gov

photo: Ron Singer photo: USFWS photo: USFWS photo: USFWS
#### Josefa APODACA, Appellant, v. OLD SECURITY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

Nos. 76-1590, 76-1764.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 9, 1977.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Luis Stabinski & Associates, Miami, for appellant.

Vernis & Bowling, Coconut Grove, and Stephen N. Montalto, North Miami, for ap-pellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant Josefa Apodaca appeals from a final summary judgment precluding her from proceeding to arbitration against the appellee Old Security Insurance Co. on an uninsured motorist claim. She contends that it was unnecessary for her to proceed to judgment against the negligent tort-feasor before she could arbitrate her uninsured motorist claim because the tort-feasor’s liability insurance limits on bodily injury were less than the limits applicable under the uninsured motorist coverage. The law is clear that an injured plaintiff who has available uninsured motorist coverage may compel arbitration on an uninsured motorist claim without first proceeding to judgment against the negligent tort-feasor where the tortfeasor’s liability insurance limits are less than the limits applicable under the uninsured motorist coverage. *Arrieta*v. *Volkswagen Insurance Co.,*343 So.2d 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). We, accordingly, reverse the final summary judgment and remand with directions to enter a judgment in which the appellant may compel arbitration on her uninsured motorist claim without first proceeding to judgment against the negligent tortfeasor.

Reversed.
EXHIBIT 23.2

LOGO

Porter Keadle Moore, LLP

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated March 11, 2005, accompanying
the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of CCF Holding Company on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of
CCF Holding Company on Form S-8 (File No. 333-35108).

/s/ PORTER KEADLE MOORE, LLP

Atlanta, Georgia

March 29, 2006

Certified Public Accountants

Suite 1800
 235 Peachtree Street NE  Atlanta, Georgia 30303  Phone 404-588-4200  Fax 404-588-4222  ww.pkm.com
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1823 

To empower States and local governments to prosecute illegal aliens and 

to authorize the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish a pilot 

Volunteer Border Marshal Program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 5, 2005 

Mrs. HUTCHISON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To empower States and local governments to prosecute illegal 

aliens and to authorize the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish a pilot Volunteer Border Marshal Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Illegal Immigration 

5 Enforcement and Empowerment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STATE ENFORCEMENT AND EMPOWERMENT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—A State or unit of local govern8 ment may investigate, identify, apprehend, arrest, detain, 
2 

•S 1823 IS

1 prosecute, and impose criminal or civil penalties upon any 

2 individual who violates— 

3 (1) a Federal immigration law; or 

4 (2) a State law that is based, in part, upon the 

5 violation of Federal immigration law. 

6 (b) LIMITATION.—Criminal penalties imposed under 

7 subsection (a) may not exceed the penalties authorized 

8 under section 275(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 

9 Act (8 U.S.C. 1325(a)). 

10 (c) FEDERAL DETERMINATION OF IMMIGRATION

11 STATUS.—No penalty may be imposed upon an individual 

12 under this section unless the individual has been identified 

13 by the Federal Government as having violated a Federal 

14 immigration law. 

15 SEC. 3. VOLUNTEER BORDER MARSHAL PROGRAM. 

16 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 90 days after 

17 the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Home18 land Security may establish a pilot Volunteer Border Mar19 shal Program (referred to in this section as the ‘‘Pro20 gram’’). 

21 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Program is to as22 sist the Department of Homeland Security in securing the 

23 borders of the United States in a safe and orderly manner 

24 by using volunteer, State-licensed peace officers who are 

25 already well trained. 
3 

•S 1823 IS

1 (c) ASSIGNMENTS.—Upon deployment, the volunteer 

2 peace officers shall be sworn in as Special United States 

3 Border Marshals and shall be assigned to the Office of 

4 Border Patrol, which shall act as the lead agency of the 

5 Program. 

6 (d) ROTATIONS.—The volunteer peace officers shall 

7 rotate on temporary missions along the international bor8 ders of the United States to assist the Office of Border 

9 Patrol in identifying and controlling illegal immigration 

10 and human and drug trafficking. 

11 (e) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘peace of12 ficer’’ means any law enforcement agent, whether cur13 rently employed or retired, who is licensed by a State au14 thority to enforce State or local penal offenses. 

Æ
## NUMBER 13 - 21 - 000 409 - CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

JASON OMAR MORENO, Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.



## ORDER
Before Justice s Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam Appellate counsel filed an Anders 1 brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel in

1 See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967).2

this cause

. Appellant has been unable to examine the record in order to file a pro se response to the Anders brief

. A ppellant has filed a motion for access to the appellate record

. The Court, having fully examined and considered appellant ’ s motion for access to the appellate record , is of the opinion that, in the interest of justice, appellant ’ s motion should be granted with order. Accordingly, we GRANT appellant’s motion , and it is hereby ORDERED that the trial court ensure that appellant has the opportunity to ful ly examine the appellate record on or before fifteen (15) days from the date of this order . It is FURTHER ORDERED the trial court notify this Court as to the date upon which the appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Furthermore, Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record is first made available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall have twenty (20) days thereafter to file its re sponse, if any.

PER CURIAM Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
D elivered and filed on t he 21st day of December , 20 22

.