alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC LAW 112–19—JUNE 24, 2011 125 STAT. 231 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S.J. Res. 7: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 157 (2011): 

Mar. 15, considered and passed Senate. 

June 16, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–19 

112th Congress 

Joint Resolution 

Providing for the reappointment of Shirley Ann Jackson as a citizen regent of 

the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), 

the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, 

in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by reason 

of the expiration of the term of Shirley Ann Jackson of New York, 

is filled by reappointment of the incumbent for a term of 6 years, 

effective May 6, 2011. 

Approved June 24, 2011. 

Effective date. 

June 24, 2011 

[S.J. Res. 7] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
From: Robert Berman [mailto:bermaneconomics@gmail.com]  

Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 11:04 AM

To: Brian Coffey; Parker Richard; Cymbalsky John

Cc: Wes Patterson; Aaron.Meyers@cooperindustries.com Meyers;

adelaski@standardsasap.org; ahofmann@publicpower.org;

Antonio.Trujillo@cooperindustries.com Trujillo; Berman Robert A.;

bruce.r.hirsch@bge.com; bsmith@federalpacific.com; Bolduc Christopher; Caitlin

Johnson; carlosgsiqueiros@eaton.com; Gaytan Carlos; chad.kennedy@us.schneider‐

electric.com; Simmons Charles E.; Cohen Dan; Millure David;

eduardorobles@eaton.com; Petersen Eric; Fernstrom Gary; Rosenquist Gregory;

Coulter Greg; Jack.Moore@cooperindustries.com Moore C;

Jeffrey.Schneider@cooperindustries.com Schneider A;

Jennifer.Smith2@cooperindustries.com Smith; Corkran Jerry L.; Schoen Jerry W.;

jhodge@howard‐ind.com Hodge; Creevy Jim; Mauer Joanna; Caskey John. F;

jrossetti@mlgw.org; Coughlin Katie; Winder Kenneth A.; stoering@xcelenergy.com;

Hyland Michael J.; Raba Jim; Michael.Loomans@cooperindustries.com Loomans T;

Michael Rivest; Waltner Meg; Ryan Paul; phopkinson@hvolt.com Hopkinson; Kumar

Puesh; Polinski Raymond; Raymond.Poole@cooperindustries.com Poole L; Greeson

Robert; Richard.Marusinec@cooperindustries.com Marusinec M; Anderson Richard;

Saint Robert; Matthew Nardotti; Pamela Costello

Subject: Analysis Requests And Clarifying Questions

Gentleman,

There appeared to be a consensus at the last meeting that the group would find it

helpful to see an analysis based only on the least‐cost design for each

CSL/EL/TSL (as the case may be). Accordingly, the attached requests and questions

are offered to address those needs. Although there are many Calculations

requested, all are based on the existing runs and data that DOE/LBL/Navigant

have. Indeed, only 7 designs are necessary. The calculations are generally no

more than one or two lines each on the same spread sheet, and thus should not

constitute a burden.
256 La. 246

#### C. L. MORRIS and E. J. Green, Jr. v. TRANSTATES PETROLEUM INC.

No. 50543.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 8, 1970.

In re: C. C. Olmstead et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish, of Caddo. 234 So.2d 243.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1829 

To repeal certain sections of the Act of May 26, 1936, pertaining to the 

Virgin Islands. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 6, 2005 

Mr. DOMENICI (for himself and Mr. BINGAMAN) (by request) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To repeal certain sections of the Act of May 26, 1936, 

pertaining to the Virgin Islands. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CERTAIN LAWS PERTAINING TO 

4 THE VIRGIN ISLANDS. 

5 (a) REPEAL.—Sections 1 through 6 of the Act of May 

6 26, 1936 (48 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.), are repealed. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 this section takes effect on July 22, 1954. 

Æ
# Former DLA Troop Support commander takes charge of 8th TSC in Hawaii

/ Published June 13, 2018
SCHOFIELD BARRACKS, Hawaii , 
The 8th Theater Sustainment Command, the Pacific theater’s senior Army logistics command, officially changed command June 7 during a ceremony at Hamilton Field.

During the ceremony, hosted by U.S. Army Pacific commander Gen. Robert Brown, Maj. Gen. Susan A. Davidson relinquished command to Brig. Gen. Charles R. Hamilton.

For the past two years, Davidson has led the 8th TSC, which is responsible for enabling plans and synchronizes theater distribution and sustainment for the Pacific theater. The 8th TSC units represent more than 5,000 troops representing 167 military occupational specialties.

Brown said that he was proud of the work Davidson and her team accomplished over the past two years.

“We are so fortunate to have had the right leader in command at the right time,” Brown said. “She (Davidson) negotiated with ease the complicated synchronization, integration and coordination of numerous enabling formations to provide tailored support and distribution to Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines across the Indo-Pacific region so that the warfighters request was at the right place, at the right time and in the right quantity.”

Davidson, the command’s first and only female commander, thus far, said that she has enjoyed her time as the 8th TSC’s commander and is proud of all of the accomplishments of her Soldiers. Though bittersweet, she said she was proud to have served with each and every member and wished them well on future endeavors.

“I am absolutely sure that this organization has the best professionals in the Army. I have constantly been impressed by your performance in not only sustaining the force, but some of the more unique missions people wouldn’t think of right away when they think of the 8th TSC,” said Davidson. “I am proud to have served with each and every one of you, and I wish you all the best in your future endeavors. I am extremely proud that while I leave you today in good hands, I will be remaining nearby to continue to serve and support this region.”

After commanding the 8th TSC, Davidson will become the J4 (Logistics, Engineering and Security Cooperation) for U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Headquarters.

Before commanding the 8th TSC, Hamilton was most recently the Assistant Chief of Staff of J4, United States Forces Korea. He also served as the Deputy Assistant Chief of Staff, U4, United Nations Command and Deputy Chief of Staff, C4, Combined Forces Command.

He brings a vast wealth of knowledge and experience in the Quartermaster Corps to the 8th TSC and said he looks forward to leading the unit to great things in the future.

“The 8th TSC has a great reputation. We will continue to be warfighter focused and integrate and sync all sustainment for U.S. Indo-Pacific Command,” said Hamilton. “We will conduct tough, realistic training. Thanks to all of the Soldiers on the field and I look forward to training with you and preparing for our next fight.”

**Editor's note:** Maj. Gen. Susan Davidson also previously served as the commander of DLA Distribution from June 2012 - May 2014.
# Spreading the Word

/ Published Feb. 16, 2018
WASHINGTON, District of Columbia , 
Selling the benefits of doing business with Defense Logistics Agency Energy, Marc McConahy reached out to federal and non-Department of Defense customers at the General Services Administration’s FedFleet 2018 conference Feb. 1.

McConahy, the****DLA Energy Customer Operations Directorate Customer Relationship Management Division chief, said it’s his team’s mission to grow and expand DLA Energy’s service to non-DOD government agencies. "As part of DLA’s commitment to support the whole of government, we use our global petroleum supply network and expertise in supply chain operations to improve efficiency and increase effectiveness for our customers," he said. 

The CRM team is the first touch point for all non-DOD customers exploring the use of the DLA Energy products and services, McConahy explained. 

"Some people are surprised to learn that DLA serves a broad range of non-DOD customers," he said. "The focus of the CRM is federal agencies and contractors, and DOD contractors." 

McConahy briefed about the products authorized for non-DOD customers including aviation, ground and marine fuels; electricity, natural gas and coal and bulk gases; spacecraft and missile propellants. 

"The Federal Acquisition Regulation governs our purchasing process," said McConahy. "Its purpose is to ensure purchasing procedures are standard and consistent, and conducted in a fair and impartial manner." 

Citing the Defense Capital Working Fund, McConahy detailed how DLA Energy sets fuel pricing and how agreements are established. 

"We must recover our operating cost within the pricing for products and services we provide while not making a profit or taking a loss," he said. "Fuel is sold to non-DOD customers at DLA Energy’s cost plus an overhead rate that is set for the fiscal year. This year at 4.5 cents per gallon delivered." 

McConahy provided an overview of the Contract Information System and ways customers pay for fuel. This web based application allows customers to identify sources of fuel worldwide for aircrafts, ships and installations. 

Some attendees, like representatives from long-established customers NASA and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, were well informed of DLA’s support to whole of government. Others like Randy White, GSA fleet manager at McAlester Army Ammunition Plant in McAlester, Oklahoma, attended to learn more about DLA Energy products and services. 

"We have a lot of bulk fuel delivered by DLA to the ammunition plant, and I wanted to learn as much as I can about how DLA Energy supports our operations," White said. 

At the briefing’s conclusion, McConahy provided information for customers to contact DLA Energy, offered DLA Energy’s latest publications and took questions.

"FedFleet is a great opportunity to brief existing and potential DLA Energy customers," he said. 

To contact the CRM, visit **DLA's****Energy's Customer and Vendor Assistance webpage.**
256 La. 248

#### Mildred Sue KILPATRICK v. Kenneth Dale KILPATRICK.

No. 50550.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 8, 1970.

In re: Mildred Sue Kilpatrick applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Lincoln. 232 So.2d 788.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
Exhibit
21.1




SUBSIDIARIES






Perfect
Dream Limited, a corporation established under the laws of the British Virgin
Islands




Goldenway
Nanjing Garments Co., Ltd, a wholly foreign-owned limited liability company
formed under the laws of the People's Republic of China




Nanjing
Catch-Luck Garments Co., Ltd., a wholly foreign-owned limited
liability company formed under the laws of the People’s Republic of
China




Nanjing
New-Tailun Garments Co., Ltd., a wholly foreign-owned limited
liability company formed under the laws of the People’s Republic of
China





Shanghai
La Go Go Fashion Company Limited, a limited liability company formed under
the laws of the People’s Republic of China





Ever-Glory
International Group Apparel Inc. a limited liability company formed under
the laws of the People’s Republic of China





Ever-Glory
International Group (HK) Ltd. a limited liability company formed under the laws
of Samoa
```

[115th Congress Public Law 172]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 1290]]

Public Law 115-172
115th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer 
Financial Protection relating to ``Indirect Auto Lending and Compliance 
 with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act''. <<NOTE: May 21, 2018 -  [S.J. 
                               Res. 57]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating 
to ``Indirect Auto Lending and Compliance with the Equal Credit 
Opportunity Act'' (CFPB Bulletin 2013-02 (March 21, 2013), and printed 
in the Congressional Record on December 6, 2017, on pages S7888-S7889, 
along with a letter of opinion from the Government Accountability Office 
dated December 5, 2017, that the Bulletin is a rule under the 
Congressional Review Act), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

    Approved May 21, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S.J. Res. 57:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Apr. 17, 18, considered and passed Senate.
            May 8, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
#### Ansel BLANTON, Appellant, v. Dorothy BLANTON, Individually, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, a Foreign Corporation, licensed to do business in the State of Florida, Appellees.

No. 76-2678.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 24, 1978.

Kenneth B. Swinger of Swinger & Beaver, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

William R. Hussey, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

ANSTEAD, Judge.

The appellant, Ansel Blanton, brought an action against his wife, Dorothy Blanton, and her insurance carrier, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, for damages arising out of the wife’s alleged negligent operation of an automobile. The trial court dismissed the action under the doctrine of interspousal immunity. We affirm.

This court and the Florida Supreme Court have recently ruled that the doctrine of interspousal immunity will not bar an action by a third party against a claimant’s spouse under the uniform contribution among joint tortfeasors act. *Shor*v. *Paoli,*353 So.2d 825 (Opinion filed November 17, 1977); *Paoli*v. *Shor,*345 So.2d 789 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). We held there at page 790:

> To say that Shor doesn’t have to contribute and account for her wrongdoing would be unfair to Paoli and a windfall to Shor. This is not a case where the husband sued the wife on account of her negligence so we are not doing any real damage to the doctrine. This is a case *431where the joint tortfeasor sued the joint tortfeasor and we are ruling in support of that statute.

In *Paoli*we recognized the viability of the interspousal immunity doctrine. The Supreme Court, in approving our decision, apparently also recognized the continued existence of the doctrine. The doctrine is still alive and well in Florida, and it bars a direct tort action between spouses. The trial court was correct in dismissing the action, and the order of dismissal is hereby affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY and LETTS, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K/A
Amendment No. 1

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001

Commission file number 333-42127

ABN AMRO Mortgage Corporation (as depositor under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
Dated as of March 1, 1998 providing for, inter alia, the issuance of ABN AMRO Mortgage
Corporation Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 1998-1)
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of  incorporation or organization)

363886007
(I.R.S. Employer  Identification No.)

181 West Madison Street, Chicago, Illinois  60602
(Address of principal executive offices)

60602
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (248)  643-2530

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
           Yes [X]       No  [ ]

This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A amends Item 14 of the original Form
10-K which was filed on March 25, 2002


      Item 14.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.

	(a)	Exhibits

		(99.1)	Annual Independent Accountant's Servicing Report

		(99.2)	Annual Statement of Compliance

	(b) 	Reports on Form 8-K were filed during the last quarter of 2001 in order to provide
statements for the monthly distributions to investors on September 27, 2001,
October 25, 2001, November 27, 2001, and December 26, 2001.

Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 are not filed herewith since documents were not received at least
three business days prior to the due date of this report.  The documents will be included in the
Form 10-K/A to be filed within 30 days of the receipt of such documents.



				SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

LaSalle Bank National Association, in its
capacity as Agent for the Trustee under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement on behalf of  ABN AMRO Mortgage
Corporation, Registrant


By:	/s/  	Cynthia Reis
	---------------------------
		Cynthia Reis
		First Vice President

Date:	May 21, 2002
#### Howard P. MILLER and Mildred D. Miller, his wife, Petitioners, v. COMMERCIAL STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation of Fort Worth, Texas, Respondent.

No. 69-504.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 8, 1969.

Certiorari dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         262
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    19912
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               20174
<PP&E>                                         42801
<DEPRECIATION>                                 19016
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 322293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          22338
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       338
<OTHER-SE>                                     157922
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   322293
<SALES>                                        284
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               284
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               16756
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             271
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (16743)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (16743)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (16743)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report  Northeast  Indiana  Bancorp,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December 31, 2004,  as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date of this  Certification  (the
"Report"),  I,  Stephen E. Zahn,  the Chief  Executive  Officer  and I, Randy J.
Sizemore,  the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report  complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


By: /s/ Stephen E. Zahn                 By: /s/ Randy J. Sizemore
    -----------------------                 -------------------------
Name: Stephen E. Zahn                   Name: Randy J. Sizemore
Chief Executive Officer                 Chief Financial Officer
March 23, 2005                          March 23, 2005
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

                            [VillageEDOCS Letterhead]

July 30, 2002

Mr. C. Alan Williams
Mrs. Joan P. Williams
306 Morning Canyon Road
Corona Del Mar, CA  92625

Dear Mr. and Mrs. Williams,

The purpose of this letter is to confirm that VillageEDOCS (the "Company") has
today granted you a full ratchet anti-dilution right to receive additional
shares of its common stock in the event that Mr. James Townsend converts some or
all of his $507,747 in promissory notes, plus accrued interest, to equity.

Specifically, should Mr. Townsend convert some or all of his outstanding
promissory notes to common stock at any price lower than $0.13 per share, you
will be issued, for no additional consideration, a number of new shares of
VillageEDOCS common stock such that your conversion price shall be equivalent to
Mr. Townsend's conversion price with respect to the same number of shares.

For example, if Mr. Townsend converts $100,000 of debt to shares at $0.10 per
share (a price which is $0.03 per share lower than the $0.13 per share at which
you have converted), the Company would issue you 3,333,333 ($100,000 divided by
$0.03) new shares of common stock for no additional consideration.

To acknowledge your receipt of this letter, we ask that you sign and return the
enclosed copy of this agreement to the Company. Thank you for your continued
support of VillageEDOCS.

Kindest regards,


/s/ K. Mason Conner

K. Mason Conner
President and CEO                                Acknowledgement

cc:  Michael Cronin, Esq. - Johnson Blakely

                                                   /s/ C. Alan Williams
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 C. Alan Williams




                                                   /s/ Joan P. Williams
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Joan P. Williams