alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[112th Congress Public Law 19]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 125 STAT. 231]]

Public Law 112-19
112th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Providing for the reappointment of Shirley Ann Jackson as a citizen 
           regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
         Institution. <<NOTE: June 24, 2011 -  [S.J. Res. 7]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Effective date.>> That, 
in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), 
the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in 
the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the 
expiration of the term of Shirley Ann Jackson of New York, is filled by 
reappointment of the incumbent for a term of 6 years, effective May 6, 
2011.

    Approved June 24, 2011.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S.J. Res. 7:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 157 (2011):
            Mar. 15, considered and passed Senate.
            June 16, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 167 (Thursday, August 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45686-45687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22882]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR


Labor Advisory Committee for Trade Negotiations and Trade Policy; 
Meeting Notice

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(P.L. 92-463 as amended), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
Steering Subcommittee of the Labor Advisory Committee for Trade 
Negotiations and Trade Policy.

    Date, time and place: September 11, 1997, 10:00 am, U.S. 
Department of Labor, Seminar Room #4, 200 Constitution Ave., NW, 
Washington, DC 20210.

[[Page 45687]]

    Purpose: The meeting will include a review and discussion of 
current issues which influence U.S. trade policy. Potential U.S. 
negotiating objectives and bargaining positions in current and 
anticipated trade negotiations will be discussed. Pursuant to 
section 9(B) of the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(9)(B) it has been determined that the meeting will be 
concerned with matters the disclosure of which would seriously 
compromise the Government's negotiating objectives or bargaining 
positions. Accordingly, the meeting will be closed to the public.
    For further information, contact: Jorge Perez-Lopez, Director, 
Office of International Economic Affairs; Phone: (202) 219-7597.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of August 1997.
Andrew J. Samet,
Acting Deputy Under Secretary, International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 97-22882 Filed 8-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-28-M
Exhibit 23

<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
                                                                      ----------

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------

      We hereby consent to the  incorporation by reference and use of our report
dated  February 3, 2005 on the  consolidated  financial  statements of Northeast
Indiana Bancorp, Inc. (which report is included as Exhibit 13 to the Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended  December 31,  2004),  in Northeast  Indiana  Bancorp,
Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8.


                                        /s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
South Bend, Indiana
March 23, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1714 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1714

 To modify requirements under the emergency relief program under title 
    23, United States Code, with respect to projects for repair or 
   reconstruction in response to damage caused by Hurricane Katrina.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 15, 2005

   Mr. Vitter (for himself, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Lott, Mr. 
Inhofe, Mr. Warner, Mr. Bond, Mr. Chafee, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Thune, Mr. 
 Jeffords, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Carper, and Mrs. Clinton) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To modify requirements under the emergency relief program under title 
    23, United States Code, with respect to projects for repair or 
   reconstruction in response to damage caused by Hurricane Katrina.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EMERGENCY RELIEF PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS.

    (a) Maximum Amount.--Notwithstanding section 125(c)(1) of title 23, 
United States Code, or any other provision of law, the Secretary of 
Transportation may obligate more than $100,000,000 in a State for a 
fiscal year under the emergency relief program authorized by section 
125 of such title, for projects for the repair or reconstruction of 
highways, roads, and trails in response to damage caused by Hurricane 
Katrina.
    (b) Federal Share.--Notwithstanding section 120(e) of such title or 
any other provision of law, during the 3-year period beginning on the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Federal share of the cost of each 
project described in subsection (a) shall be 100 percent.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--In addition to amounts 
otherwise available, there is appropriated, out of any funds in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the emergency relief program 
authorized under section 125 of such title, $2,900,000,000, to remain 
available until expended: Provided, That the amounts made available 
under this section are designated as an emergency requirement pursuant 
to section 402 of H. Con. Res. 95 (109th Congress).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  quarterly  report of Sonoma  Valley  Bancorp (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  We, Mel
Switzer,  Jr., Chief  Executive  Officer and Mary Dieter Smith,  Chief Financial
Officer, of the Company certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
our knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Dated:  August 9, 2006      /s/ Mel Switzer, Jr.
        --------------      ---------------------------------------------------
                            Mel Switzer, Jr.
                            President and Chief Executive Officer
                            (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated:  August 9, 2006      /s/ Mary Dieter Smith
        --------------      ---------------------------------------------------
                            Mary Dieter Smith
                            Executive Vice President and
                            Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                            (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Don Voros

Refuge Manager

Southwest Louisiana National Wildlife Refuge Complex

1428 Highway 27 

Bell City LA 70630

337-598-2216

June 2008
#### Henry Lee RUDOLPH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-274.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Jan. 9, 1970.

Robert W. Rawlins, Public Defender, and John M. Gilbert, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

MANN, Judge.

Rudolph’s allegation that his plea of guilty to the charge of murder in the first degree was coerced is not refuted by the brief voir dire prior to reception of the plea. He is thus entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his petition. Cf. Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App., 228 So.2d 446, November 26, 1969.

Reversed and remanded.

LILES, A. C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.
#### Dale Franklin BRIGMAN and Martha Brigman, his wife, Appellants, v. Elbert Lewis McLEOD, Appellee.

No. 69-201.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 2, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
# Susquehanna’s Davis receives Outstanding DoD Employee with a Disability Award 

/ Published Oct. 22, 2018
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Sally Davis, a distribution process worker at the DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania Eastern Distribution Center, Packing and Outloading Branch, has been awarded the Outstanding DoD Employee with a Disability Award for 2018. 

Davis, who graduated from Pennsylvania School for the Deaf with a major in graphic arts in 1980, routinely works “spur 100” single-handedly, a task normally performed by two employees.  

“Thoroughness and accuracy are embodied in her behavior, and she processed over 4,000 error-free Material Requisition Orders weekly in fiscal year 2017,” explained Davis’s supervisor John Northrup.

“Ms. Davis is the model example of safety! She demonstrated superior performance in following all safety guidelines, with zero incidents in all measured safety case rates for more than three years.  She encouraged others to follow her lead, resulting in a decreased case rate for the PACOUT Branch in all three major areas,” Northrup said. 

Furthermore, Davis recommended several process improvement recommendations throughout her career.  During the nomination period, she identified required packing materials for her area and restructured the material placement layout for more efficient operations, resulting in a savings of $100,000 in labor costs, or the equivalent of two and a quarter annual full time employees. 

Using keen initiative and resourcefulness, Davis identified over 2,500 misdirected shipments on the EDC conveyance system.  She formulated a solution, working with other-organizations to ensure misrouted shipments were directed to the correct destination.  Her efforts helped support DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania’s mission “to strive to provide superior distribution services on time, every time.”   

“Ms. Davis consistently displayed enthusiasm in working with others, inspiring top performance in her area.  She is the epitome of DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania’s command philosophy of “Character, Ownership, Respect, and Excellence,” and is an example for peers and leadership alike,” said Northrup.  “She is a strong contributor to the overall success of ensuring customer satisfaction.  I am honored to recognize Sally A. Davis for this prestigious award. Her thorough grasp of all facets of her position and “can-do” attitude makes her an invaluable asset to this organization.”

Davis received her award during a ceremony held Oct. 4 at the Pentagon.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1435

LASZLO I. HORVATH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FIRST UNION CORPORATION, d/b/a First Union National Bank of North Carolina; FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-770-5-BR) Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 14, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Laszlo I. Horvath, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Edmond Weddington, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Laszlo Horvath appeals the district court’s orders granting Appellees summary judgment and denying Horvath’s motion to setaside judgment. Horvath filed an action against Appellees, claiming Appellees violated federal and state laws in surrendering property to the Internal Revenue Service pursuant to an IRS “notice oflevy.” We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Horvath’s “motion to reverse district court’s judgment order” and “motion to amend motion to reverse district court’s judgment order” and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Horvath v. First Union Corp. , No. CA-98-770-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Mar. 1, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 3, 2017

t0131

Order 

Clerk

February 3, 2017

152844

KEVIN SMITH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 152844

COA: 320437 

Genesee CC: 13-100532-CZ

CITY OF FLINT,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On January 12, 2017, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to 

appeal the November 5, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, 

the application is again considered. MCR 7.305(H)(1). In lieu of granting leave to 

appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals, for the reasons stated in the 

Court of Appeals dissenting opinion. Namely, we agree with Judge Fort Hood’s dissent 

that the plaintiff’s complaint sufficiently alleged discrimination under the 

Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (WPA), MCL 15.361 et seq., on the basis of a job 

reassignment unique to the plaintiff during undesirable hours at an undesirable location. 

See MCR 2.116(C)(8); Maiden v Rozwood, 461 Mich 109, 119-120 (1999). 

Furthermore, we VACATE as prematurely decided that part of the Court of Appeals 

majority opinion ruling sua sponte that the plaintiff’s WPA claim should be dismissed for 

failure to properly plead participation in a protected activity, given that the issue had not 

been raised by either party or reached by the trial court, and the requirements of MCR 

2.116(I)(5) have not been addressed. We REMAND this case to the Genesee Circuit 

Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order. 

We do not retain jurisdiction.
United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

No. 94-8825

Non-Argument Calendar.

Ann McCAULEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Richard T. WINEGARDEN; Superior Court of Gwinnett, and Michael

J. Bowers, Attorney General, State of Georgia, DefendantsAppellees.

Aug. 4, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of Georgia. (No. 1:93-cv-2632-ODE), Orinda D. Evans,

Judge.

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, CARNES and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

As the district court's order of May 9, 1994 dismissing

appellant's second amended complaint indicates, appellant, who

allegedly suffers from a Chemical Hypersensitivity Syndrome,

brought this suit under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42

U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 ("ADA"), to obtain injunctive relief and

money damages because a Georgia superior court judge, appellee

Richard T. Winegarden, did not provide her a "chemical free or safe

environment" (a filtered environment) on two different occasions

when she appeared pro se to prosecute a suit she brought in the

Superior Court of Gwinnett County, Georgia. In this appeal,

appellant asks us to vacate the district court's final judgment and

to remand the case for further proceedings against appellees

Winegarden, Gwinnett County, and the State of Georgia on her claims

for money damages and for an injunction enjoining appellees
 1

Appellant also sought relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3). 

The district court rejected this claim; we do so likewise,

finding it to be frivolous. 

"permanently on any further violations of the ADA." Appellant's

Brief at 46. We find no merit in appellant's request and,

therefore, affirm.1

The district court dismissed appellant's complaint on the

basis of the following ADA regulation:

This part does not require a public entity to provide to

individuals with disabilities personal devices, such as

wheelchairs; individually prescribed devices, such as

prescription eyeglasses or hearing aids; readers for personal

use or study; or services of a personal nature including

assistance in eating, toileting, or dressing.

28 C.F.R. § 35.135 (1993). We quote from the district court's

dispositive order:

[p]laintiff wanted Defendants to provide her with a "filtered

environment." The [second amended] complaint reveals that

Defendants would have had to provide Plaintiff with personal

devices in order to give here the accommodation she desired:

"life support systems,' (id., ¶ IV); "life-support bubble,'

(id.); "required medical aids,' (id.); "additional medical

aids,' (id.) Even absent the admissions in Plaintiff's

complaint, the conclusion is inescapable that providing

Plaintiff a filtered environment would have required

Defendants to provide her with personal devices. Indeed, in

this context, a filtered environment, viewed as a whole, may

itself be a personal device. Therefore, in view of § 35.135,

the court finds that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim

under the ADA against Defendants.

We agree with the district court's analysis of the merits of

appellant's ADA claim, and therefore affirm its judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
EXHIBIT 32(a)



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 of Citizens Holding Company (the Company), as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Report), I, Greg L. McKee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 5, 2005 |  | /s/ Greg L. McKee      
|                     |  | Greg L. McKee          
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
ike ceN\ISO

S c c- 0001,0 GSIOSIX CBIC Control Number



# 361569 RECEIVED OPPT CBIC 20Iti AUG 26 All II: I p. 1



# DyStar® L



# v
209 Watlington Industrial Drive Reidsville NC 27320 USA Tel: 336-342-6631/ 800-443-8814 Fax: 336-634-3324


### Date: August 19, 2014

Document Control Officer 7407M Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (MC 7405M) Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, DC 20460 RE: TSCA Section 4 — Test Rule Exemption Application

CFR 40.799.5089 (Docket # EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0112) Dear Sir/Madame: Scanned & P rocessed in CIS 

### by: SHARON

This letter is to request exemption from testing requirements for the substance listed below as required under Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0112 and in compliance with 40 CFR 790.80 and CFR 790.82.
Identification of test rule: 

### 40 CFR 799.5089 Chemical testing requirements for third group of high production volume chemicals (HPV3) Name, address, and telephone number for firm sponsoring DyStar: 

### Sandy S. Carter DyStar LP 209 Watlington Industrial Dr. Reidsville, NC 27320 336-342-6631 ext 398 Email: cartersandy©dystarcom Substance for testing CAS number: 

### 127-68-4 (Benzenesulfonic acid, 3-nitro-, sodium salt) Test requirements by 40 CFR 799.5089: 

### Vapor pressure: ASTM E 1782-08 (thermal analysis) [test A3 on Table 3 of the rule] and; Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test at 40 CFR 799.9355 [test F2 on Table 3 of the rule]Basis for Exemption: Test required by the test rule were completed by Tiarco Chemical located in Greenville, South Carolina and submitted July 8, 2013. DyStar understands that Tiarco Chemical has already completed the required testing and had submitted the study reports to the US EPA. § 790.99 Statement of financial responsibility: DyStar LP understands that if this application is granted before the reimbursement period described in section 4(c)(3)(B) of TSCA expires, I must pay fair and equitable reimbursement to the person or persons who incurred or shared in the costs of complying with the requirement to submit data and upon whose data the granting of my application was based. This material is not manufactured by DyStar nor is it used in any production processing. It is re-packed only (from bags to drums) as a sourced product. Projected amount to be re-packed is not expected to exceed 25,000 lbs per year. Please contact me if you should have any questions. Regards,

Sandy S. Carter DyStar LP 209 Watlington Industrial Dr. Reidsville, NC 27320 336-342-6631 ext 398 p. 2
# EUR-Lex - 41994D0016 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 41994D0016

**The Schengen acquis - Decision of the Executive Committee of 21 November 1994 on the acquisition of common entry and exit stamps (SCH/Com-ex (94) 16 rev.) **

*
Official Journal L 239 , 22/09/2000 P. 0166 - 0167 *

DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

of 21 November 1994

on the acquisition of common entry and exit stamps

(SCH/Com-ex (94)16 rev.)

THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE,

Having regard to Article 132 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement,

Having regard to Article 6 of the abovementioned Convention,

Takes note of and approves document SCH/I-Front (94)43 and

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

The acquisition of common entry and exit stamps by the Contracting Parties shall take place in accordance with the principles laid down in document SCH/Gem-handb (93)15(1).

Heidelberg, 21 November 1994.

The Chairman

Bernd Schmidbauer

(1) Confidential document. See SCH/Com-ex (98)17.

ACQUISITION OF COMMON ENTRY AND EXIT STAMPS

SCH/I-Front (94)43

The Contracting Parties shall take the specifications for manufacturing common entry and exit stamps, dated 17 September 1993 (SCH/Gem-handb (93)15), as the basis for the acquisition of stamps certifying entry and exit through the external borders to Schengen territory. These specifications specifically provide that two-colour ink stamps be used.

By way of exception, common entry and exit stamps employing a single colour which have already been manufactured and distributed to the border authorities may be used until they are due to be replaced. The replacement stamps must in any event be two-coloured.