alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# SHELBY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR. JANET L. SHIPMAN, J.D. HELEN MORROW, M.D., M.P. A. MAYOR INTERIM DIRECTOR January 

### 6, 2016 Michelle Owenby, Director Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Division ofAir Pollution Control 15th Floor, William R. Snodgrass Tennessee Tower 312 Rosa 

### l. Parks Ave. Nashville, TN 37243 Re: SIP Package Dear Ms. Owenby, HEALTH OFFICER 

# PubHcHealth Prevent. Promote. Protect.



## JAN 

## 12016 AM10:53

Enclosed you will find five hard copies ofthe Shelby County Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan (SCRRAMP-2015) along with five COs each containing exact copies ofthe plan along with all supporting information. This replaces the SIP Package previously conveyed to you on December

### 30, 2015. We identified some items that required modification and the Response to Comments section addresses the changes that have been made. The supporting information contains technical documents relating to inventory development including on-road emissions estimates and projections, supplemental support documents, evidence of intergovernmental consultation, and public participation information .This information includes a certified copy ofthe public notice announcing a local hearing, copies ofcertified letters sent to surrounding states and EPA regional headquarters announcing the same, a record ofattendance atthe hearing, and a list ofcomments received and agency responses. Note that no verbal or written comments were submitted atthe hearing. We are confident this package meets all requirements and guidance for such a submittal with the exception of the final letter oftransmittal from the Governor or his designee to the EPA regional headquarters. I want to thank your stafffor the support and assistance offered during the development ofthis package. R

espectfully,



# ,;z~/?7 **~** Robert Rogers, P.E . Manager, Pollution Control enclosures


### Mission 

### Topromote,protectandimprove thehealth andenvironmentof allShelby County residents. 814 Jefferson Avenue 

### t Memphis, Tennessee 38105

. (901) 222-9000
Exhibit 32.1

US ONCOLOGY, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of US Oncology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Dale Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ R. Dale Ross                            
|R. Dale Ross,                               
|Chief Executive Officer of US Oncology, Inc.

March 15, 2006
EXHIBIT 32(b)

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 of Citizens Holding Company (the Company), as
filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), I, Robert T. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (3) | the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                        
|----------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 8, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Robert T. Smith    
|                  |  |  |  | Robert T. Smith        
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer



35
```

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Joel Arberman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10QSB of Maxim Mortgage
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:

        a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us
by others within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;

        b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

        c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors:

        a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

        b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  November 14, 2003

/s/ Joel Arberman
    Joel Arberman
    Director, Chief Executive and Financial Officer
```
# L_2015122DE.01003601.xml

| 19.5.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 122/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 122/36

---

Berichtigung der Regelung Nr. 21 der Wirtschaftskommission der Vereinten Nationen für Europa (UN/ECE) — Einheitliche Vorschriften für die Genehmigung von Kraftfahrzeugen hinsichtlich ihrer Innenausstattung

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 188 vom 16. Juli 2008
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 188 vom 16. Juli 2008

Auf Seite 32 Absatz 2:

anstatt:

„Im Sinne dieser Richtlinie bedeutet:“

muss es heißen:

„Im Sinne dieser Regelung bedeutet:“

;

auf Seite 32 Absatz 1, Seite 33 Absatz 2.3, Seite 35 Absätze 3.3.1, 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.4.2 und Absatz 4.5 Zeilen 3 und 6, Seite 36 Absätze 4.8 und 5.1.2.1, Seite 37 Absatz 5.2.1, Seite 38 Absatz 5.3.2, Seite 39 Absätze 5.3.3, 5.4.2.2 und 5.4.2.3, Seite 40 Absätze 5.5.1.2.3 und 5.7.1.2, Seite 41 Absätze 5.7.1.2.3, 5.7.2 und 5.7.3, Seite 43 Absatz 5.8.3.1.3 und Absatz 5.8.4.2 Unterabsatz 2 Zeilen 2 und 4, Seite 44 Absatz 6.2, Absatz 6.3 Zeilen 3 und 4 und Absatz 7.1, Seite 45 Absätze 7.3 und 8.1, Absatz 8.2 Zeile 1 und Zeilen 2-3, Absatz 9 Zeilen 1 und 4 und Absatz 10, Seite 48 Anhang III Zusatz in Klammern unter der Überschrift „Muster A“, Absatz unter Muster A Zeilen 2 und 4, Zusatz in Klammern unter der Überschrift „Muster B“, Absatz unter Muster B Zeilen 3 und 4, Seite 50 Anhang IV Absatz 1.4.1.1 Zeilen 1 und 5, Seite 52 Anhang V Absatz 3.2.5, Seite 61 Überschrift unter Anhang VII, Seite 62 Anhang VIII Absatz 1.2.2, Seite 66 Anhang X Absatz 5.1.1 Unterabsatz 2:

anstatt:

„Verordnung“

muss es heißen:

„Regelung“;

auf Seite 35 Absatz 4.5 Zeile 1:

anstatt:

„Verordnung(en)“

muss es heißen:

„Regelung(en)“;

auf Seite 35 Absatz 4.5 Zeilen 4 und 5 und Seite 48 Absatz unter Muster B Zeile 2:

anstatt:

„Verordnungen“

muss es heißen:

„Regelungen“.

---
DuPont Chemicals & Fluoroproducts Chestnut Run Plaza 702 1276-E 4417 Lancaster Pike Wilmington, DE 19805 USA

Chestnut Run Plaza 702 / 1276

- E , Wilmington, DE 19805

E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company 

## DuPont Chemicals & Fluoroproducts

[ CONTAINS CLEAN AIR ACT CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORM ATION ]

March 21, 2013

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air and Radiation Stratospheric Protection Division Attention: Margaret Sheppard
1310 L Street NW, 10 th Floor (Room 1029) Washington, DC 20005
Dear Ms Sheppard:

Reference: DuPont SNAP Information Notice (Z)-1,1,1,4,4,4-hexafluoro-but-2-ene (CAS RN 692-4 9-9)

[ Additional Study for PMN Substance ]



### [ Attachment 27 from the original PMN submission (ent itled - FEA-1100 Toxicity Testing (CAS RN 692-92-2)) has been updated to reflect all toxic ity and ecotesting for PMN substance P-11- 0549 to date.

Please recall in our letter dated 15 September 2013 the following two studies were proposed for PMN substance.

1. 2-generation reproduction study in rats via inhalat ion

2. Rabbit developmental study

It has been determined that a tolerability study wi ll be conducted in order to determine the optimal intermediate and high exposure concentratio ns for the subsequent multigeneration reproduction study. Rats will be exposed to concent rations of the PMN substance for 6 hours per day for 7 days per week. Exposures will c ontinue for approximately 4 weeks. Body weights, food consumption, and clinical signs will be measured.

This study will be conducted at DuPont Haskell Glob al Centers for Health and Environmental Sciences, 1090 Elkton Road, Newark, DE 19714.

Proposed Experimental Start Date (first day of dosi ng): 11 February 2013

Proposed Report Date: 31 May 2013

Please contact me if you have any questions about t his submission or need further clarification. 

### ]

Sincerely,

[ Helen Walter-Terrinoni Global Marketing Manager Telephone: 302-999-2442 Email: helen.a.walter-terrinoni@usa.dupont.com ] Via Federal Express
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Investco, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the six months ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Arnold Salinas, Chief
Executive and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/Arnold Salinas
----------------------------
Arnold Salinas
Chief Executive and
Principal Accounting Officer
April 20, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1829

AN ACT

To repeal certain sections of the Act of May 26, 1936,

pertaining to the Virgin Islands.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 1829 ES

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CERTAIN LAWS PERTAINING TO

2 THE VIRGIN ISLANDS.

3 (a) REPEAL.—Sections 1 through 6 of the Act of May

4 26, 1936 (48 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.), are repealed.

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

6 this section takes effect on July 22, 1954.

Passed the Senate September 29, 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1829

AN ACT

To repeal certain sections of the Act of May 26,

1936, pertaining to the Virgin Islands.
ULYSSES BERNARD
WOODFAULK

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 2815

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 7, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County

. Gregory S. Parker , Ju dge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Zachary F. Lawton, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lauren Brudnicki, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS

, C.J., MARSTILLER and OSTERHAUS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
Case 4:04-cr-00237-JEJ Document 51 Filed 08/26/05 Page 1 of 6
Case 4:04-cr-00237-JEJ Document 51 Filed 08/26/05 Page 2 of 6
Case 4:04-cr-00237-JEJ Document 51 Filed 08/26/05 Page 3 of 6
Case 4:04-cr-00237-JEJ Document 51 Filed 08/26/05 Page 4 of 6
Case 4:04-cr-00237-JEJ Document 51 Filed 08/26/05 Page 5 of 6
Case 4:04-cr-00237-JEJ Document 51 Filed 08/26/05 Page 6 of 6
### Regulato ry Evaluation

Do cke t No. FAA- Directorate Id en ti fier: -AD



## If

yo u m a k e c h a n ges to th e va lu es in th e t ab le b e l ow, yo u mu st e n s ur e th e to t a ls u pda te acco rding l y . 

## If th ey do n o t, cli c k (o r Ta b ) int o a n d th en o ut of th e c h a n ged ce ll
. Est im ate d Costs: Action Costs p er Product (e
. g., aircraft, engine , (e.g., In s pection , propel ler, appliance) Work-hours L abo r P arts Cost Total Cos ts Number of Total Cos t replacement ) (includ e co s t (labor + 

## u. s. for U.S. F lee t Do not in clude onco nditio n cos t s h e re acce ss, testin g, ( @ $85 /h parts) Registered and c lo se -up) our) Product s 

### In specti on cost 2 , 000.0 $0 

### 1 5 )
I I (I 

### :1 

### .n II

j ., l ' I ' i " II 111
I '1. •U It o)ll ( ) ,)1 "(IJJ 0 ,, ,, ill I (ill !I 

## ' I .Ill )( 

### '"! II fj " 

## .,. ill II 1() ljl I I II ()I (I I t' I I I (,

I Th e known n umber of products in co mp l ia n ce : Total Costs of comp l iance for 

### U.S. fl ee t: $2 , 550 , 000 Costs cove red und e r wa rranty (if knm· vn ) $
On-Condition Costs:

## · Action Work- hours Labor co s t Part s Cos t Cost per Product ( e . g . , In s pection , (include acces s, ( @ $85/hou r )
r ep lacement) testing , and c lose up ) 

### Con·ective actions 2, 000 .0 ' $30 , 000 

# ., .

... ( i)l 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use thi s fi e l d to ex plain any thin g in th e E s timat e d Costs table that wa s ass um ed o r might n o t be obvious. This fi e ld c an also be used t o exp lain warranty cost s) :

### Exec utive Ord e r 12866: 

### Co uld the AD be co ns id e r ed a "s i g

nificant re g ul a t o r y actio n "?

- YES* 

## D NO 

### [3J *Ex plana tio n: DOT Regulatory Policies and P rocedures: 

### I s the AD s ignifican t?

# ~ YES* 

# D NO 

### [3J *Exp lanati o n : Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

### Will the AD ha ve a s ign ifi cant eco no mic i mpact on a s ub sta ntial numb er of sma ll ent i t i

es? Exp lain for either a Yes or No answer. - · YES 

# D NO 

### [3J Explanation: Intrasta t e Aviation in Al as k a: 

### Thi s AD cou l d affect intrastate aviation in Alaska
. I s i

t appropriate to includ e specific r eq uirements for aircraft o perated in A l aska where av i at i on mi ght be the o nl y mod e of tra n spo rtati on ?

- YES* 

## D NO 

### [3J *Exp l anat io n :
#### Charles CASTOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. EE-91.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 28, 1977.

*376Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

SMITH, Judge.

A conviction for murder in the-third degree. Defense counsel did not clearly request that the jury be recharged on excusable and justifiable homicide when the court recharged the jury on the degrees of murder and manslaughter. *Hedges v. State,*172 So.2d 824 (Fla.1965) is therefore inapplicable. The sentencing judge, who was not the trial judge, acted within his authority under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700(c) by taking into consideration the jury’s verdict of guilt, the presentence investigation report and the prosecutor’s supplementary description of the offense. Appellant’s explanation at the sentencing, which amounted to a plea of self-defense, had been rejected by the jury. Accordingly, the sentencing judge was not required to delve further into the record to familiarize himself with the case. *McCoy v. State,*344 So.2d 250 (Fla.1st DCA 1977). Contrast *Caplinger v. State,*271 So.2d 780 (Fla.3d DCA 1973). No other error appears.

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS, J., concur.
#### SOUTHERN TOURS, INC. v. NEW ORLEANS AVIATION BOARD, Paul J. Stoulig, Jerome S. Glazer, Nolan A. Marshall, Robert L’Hoste, James M. Trotter, III, Henry J. Priloux, Jr., Phyllis Landrieu, Lane Meltzer, and Richard J. Kernion.

No. 62221.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 2, 1978.

In re: Southern Tours, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 357 So.2d 102.

Writ denied.

MARCUS, J., would grant the writ.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

 

I,Harvey Beker, the Co-Chief Executive Officer of Millburn RidgefieldCorporation, the Managing Owner of The Millburn World Resource Trust (the “Trust”),certify that (i) the Annual Report of the Trust on Form 10-K for the periodending December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the informationcontained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

 
| Date:  | March 26, 2004 |                        |   |   |
|--------|----------------|-----------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | /s/            | Harvey Beker                |   |
|   |           | Harvey Beker                |
|   |           | Co-Chief  Executive Officer |

 

1

----
132 STAT. 1234 PUBLIC LAW 115–150—MAR. 23, 2018 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3638: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 163 (2017): Dec. 12, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 164 (2018): Mar. 7, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–150 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1100 Kings 

Road in Jacksonville, Florida, as the ‘‘Rutledge Pearson Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. RUTLEDGE PEARSON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 1100 Kings Road in Jacksonville, Florida, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Rutledge Pearson Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Rutledge Pearson Post Office Building’’. 

Approved March 23, 2018. 

Mar. 23, 2018 

[H.R. 3638] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
# L_2013184EN.01000601.xml

| 3.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 184/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 184/6

---

DECISION OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES

of 1 July 2013

appointing a Judge to the Court of Justice

(2013/349/EU)

THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 19 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 253 and 255 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a(1) thereof,

Having regard to the Act of Accession of Croatia, and in particular Article 22(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 22(1) of the Act of Accession provides for the appointment of a Croatian judge to the Court of Justice for the period from 1 July 2013 to 6 October 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 22(1) of the Act of Accession provides for the appointment of a Croatian judge to the Court of Justice for the period from 1 July 2013 to 6 October 2015.

| (2) | Mr Siniša RODIN has been proposed as a candidate for appointment as a judge of the Court of Justice. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Mr Siniša RODIN has been proposed as a candidate for appointment as a judge of the Court of Justice.

| (3) | The panel set up by Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given an opinion on the suitability of Mr Siniša RODIN to perform the duties of Judge of the Court of Justice, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The panel set up by Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given an opinion on the suitability of Mr Siniša RODIN to perform the duties of Judge of the Court of Justice,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Siniša RODIN is hereby appointed a judge of the Court of Justice for the period from 1 July 2013 to 6 October 2015.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 July 2013.

Done at Brussels, 1 July 2013.

For the Council

The President

L. LINKEVIČIUS

---