alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

           Central Jersey Bancorp Declares Five Percent Stock Dividend


LONG BRANCH, NEW JERSEY, May 28, 2008, (NASDAQ Global Market: CJBK) - The Board
of Directors of Central Jersey Bancorp, the parent corporation of Central Jersey
Bank, N.A., recently declared a stock dividend equal to five percent (5%) of the
authorized and outstanding shares of Common Stock payable on July 1, 2008 to
shareholders of record on June 13, 2008.

James S. Vaccaro, Chairman, President and CEO commented, "In declaring this
dividend, the Board of Directors wishes to recognize and reward the loyalty and
confidence that each of its shareholders has placed in the organization. With
the strong support of its ownership, Central Jersey Bancorp has been able to
strategically expand its franchise and experience market success."

About the Company

Central Jersey Bancorp is the holding company and sole shareholder of Central
Jersey Bank, N.A. Central Jersey Bank, N.A. provides a full range of banking
services to both individual and business customers through twelve branch
facilities located in Monmouth and Ocean Counties, New Jersey. Central Jersey
Bancorp is traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the ticker symbol "CJBK."
Central Jersey Bank, N.A. can be accessed through the internet at CJBNA.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements about the future expectations of Central Jersey Bancorp and its
subsidiary, Central Jersey Bank, N.A., including future revenues and earnings,
and all other statements in this press release other than historical facts are
"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended. Since these statements involve risks and uncertainties and are
subject to change at any time, the companies' actual results could differ
materially from expected results. Among these risks, trends and uncertainties
are the effect of governmental regulation on Central Jersey Bank, N.A., interest
rate fluctuations, regional economic and other conditions, the availability of
working capital, the cost of personnel and technology, and the competitive
market in which Central Jersey Bank, N.A. operates.

Contacts:

James S. Vaccaro, Chairman, President and CEO; 732-571-1300
Robert S. Vuono, Sr. EVP & COO; 732-292-1600
Anthony Giordano, III, EVP and CFO; 732-923-1115
# Employee Spotlight:  Michael Black

/ Published May 2, 2018
Richmond, Va., 
Employee spotlight regularly features outstanding non-supervisory personnel from throughout the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation and other DLA employees on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. Organizational directors may submit names of employees they wish to feature in this column to DLA Aviation Public Affairs. For more information, call (804) 279-3139.

**Name:** Michael Black   

**Organization:**DLA Aviation-Cherry Point, Material Management Branch, Technical Quality Section

**Years of Service:** 18

**What is your job title, and what do you do, specifically?**

As an equipment specialist, I perform various duties. I research, create/maintain and update material master records for non-DLA managed consumables, local and national stock numbers for various shops, and the V-22 Osprey and H-1 Huey helicopters.  I relish every opportunity to assist fellow co-workers whether it is complex or mundane.  I especially enjoy engaging with customer support specialists and their leads, acquisition and sustainment specialists, vendors, original equipment manufacturers, engineers and more.

**What do you like most about your job?**It is challenging.

**What kind(s) of training and education helps your work performance in your current role?**

As an equipment specialist, I have received a lot of training including technical writing, drawing, dimension and tolerance courses. All of it helps my work performance. 

**What aspect(s) of your current job gives you the most personal satisfaction? Why?**

Being able to make a positive impact, as we are the focal point for all material being ordered. Our job role is crucial in getting the correct material to the warfighter.  

**What was your first job?**

My first job was passing out flyers for a construction company. I made a whopping 10 cents per flyer, and the boss bought lunch.   

**What’s your biggest pet peeve?**  My biggest pet peeve is when anyone makes fun of a handicap person.

**Do you have an unfulfilled wish?** I have always wanted to travel to New Zealand.

**If you had a theme song, what would it be and why?** My theme song would be “Don’t Worry, Be Happy” because at the end of the day, what does worrying accomplish? 

**What five things could you absolutely not live without?**  I could not live without Jesus, food, shelter, great friends and good music.
**Urban Influence Codes (97002)**
# VPP campaign: Know your safety program, help earn your team’s star

/ Published April 6, 2018
PHILADELPHIA, 
An awareness campaign will launch April 9 so that the Defense Logistics Agency Philadelphia workforce is ready when the time comes to earn star status for the Voluntary Protection Program. 

VPP is an Occupational Safety and Health Administration program. Earning the VPP star would signify excellence in safety and health management at DLA Philadelphia. 

“As each of the DLA Philadelphia activities work to support the warfighter and our other valued customers, it’s important that the environment in which this work takes place comprises physical wellness and safety,” Richard Ellis, DLA Troop Support deputy commander, said.

“We owe it to our workforce to provide them with a workplace that is safe,” Ellis said. “It is also incumbent upon each and every employee to take personal interest and responsibility for a safe work environment.”

The VPP campaign is intended to make employees more aware of the safety program and their role in it. Before OSHA grants DLA Philadelphia the VPP star, their inspectors will visit the facilities here and check employees for their knowledge of the program.

“The most effective safety program is one in which all employees play a role in keeping the workplace safe,” Keith Cheng, DLA Philadelphia Safety Office manager, said. 

When the campaign is complete, DLA Philadelphia will be closer to requesting OSHA to come and determine whether DLA Philadelphia will be granted star status.

**How the VPP campaign works**

As employees prove their awareness of the DLA Philadelphia safety program, they can help earn stars for their own teams, divisions, directorates and eventually, DLA Philadelphia.
      - There will be a safety topic per month during the five month campaign to coordinate with the five points of a star.
      - Information about each safety topic will be emailed to the workforce and published on  DLA Today  and the  VPP campaign website . 
      - Once supervisors know that all the employees on their team are familiar with the topic, that team earns a star for that topic.

For example, when all employees in a branch prove their awareness of a safety topic to their supervisor, that supervisor grants the branch a star. When all branches within a division have their star, the division gets a star. And the same goes all the way up to the directorate level, organization and then DLA Philadelphia. 
      - Star charts and stars will be delivered to each directorate.

One option to complete the review is for supervisors to do so during their monthly safety inspections. 

Visit OSHA’s VPP website and DLA Philadelphia’s VPP site on eWorkplace for more VPP information.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             879
<SECURITIES>                                    14,178
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,494
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,551
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              890
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,661
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,551
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,415
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   536
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,879
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,879
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,879
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Printable VersionE-mail this page   National ProgramsInternational ProgramsFind Research ProjectsThe Research EnterpriseOffice of Scientific Quality ReviewResearch Initiatives UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">		You are here: 						Research / 																				**Research Project:**USE OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) METHODS TO UNDERSTAND SPATIAL PATTERNS OF MOSQUITO VECTORS OF WEST NILE VIRUS**2005 Annual Report**
**4d.Progress report.**													This report serves to document research conducted under Specific Cooperative Agreement 58-5410-4-354, "Use of Geographic Information System (GIS) Methods to Understand Spatial Patterns of Mosquito vectors of West Nile virus", with the University of Wyoming Department of Renewable Resources, College of Agriculture, Laramie, WY. Additional details of research can be found in the report for the parent project 5410-32000-013-00X, "Research on Bettering Surveillance of Arboviral Threats, Using West Nile virus as a Model".
The research uses Geographic Information System approaches and satellite imagery to identify mosquito larval habitats on a regional scale and to predict areas and seasonal conditions in which mosquito populations have the greatest potential for transmitting viral pathogens. A manuscript has been prepared for publication concerning use of satellite imagery to assess larval habitats of the mosquito, Culex tarsalis, primary vector of West Nile virus (WNV), associated with increasing surface water impoundments (ponds) that result from production of coalbed methane gas. A second manuscript has been prepared that estimates the risk for transmission of WNV by C. tarsalis based on degree day accumulations, a measure of ambient summer temperature as it affects virus infection and growth in mosquitoes, on a large scale using the state of Wyoming as an example.						
    
Project Annual Reports FY 2009 FY 2008 FY 2007 FY 2006 FY 2005 Publications  Publications 
Related National Programs Animal Health(103) Veterinary, Medical and Urban Entomology(104)  							Last Modified: 01/10/2012 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
#### C. Louis Watjen et al., appellants, *v.*Ashbel Green, receiver of the North River Construction Company, respondent.

On appeal from a decree of the chancellor, whose opinion is-reported in *Watjen*v. *Green, 3 Dick. Ch. Rep. 322.*

*Mr. Anthony Q. Keasbey,*for the appellants.

*Mr. J. Howard Mansfield*(of New York) and *Mr. John P. Stockton,*for the respondent.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given by the chancellor.

Dixon, J.

(dissenting).

I agree, in substance, with the opinion of the chancellor in this-cause, down to the point at which he regards the receiver’s proposition to Fatman & Co. as an offer to perform the contract for the delivery of bonds. I deem that proposition as, in effect, a notice that he would not perform the contract, and, consequently, as relieving Fatman & Co., and, therefore, their principals, the appellants, from the obligation to make formal tender of the residue of the price and formal demand of the bonds. It also-constituted a breach of the contract on the part of the receiver, and, hence, fixed the time at which the appellant’s damages should be ascertained.

These damages the chancellor correctly estimates at $650. To-this sum I think they have a legal right; and .it now appearing-that, after the satisfaction of all other debts against the corporation, the receiver has in hand a considerable sum of money which the chancellor is about, not to turn over to the corporation, but to distribute among the stockholders in final settlement of the-corporate affairs and dissolution of the corporation itself, I think,. *577on the simple equity that debtors should pay their debts, the appellants ought to be paid what is legally due. The fact that other creditors agreed to accept and did accept fifty per cent, of their legal claims in full satisfaction, should not in the least impair the rights of the appellants.

In my judgment, the decree should be reversed, and a decree entered giving the appellants $650 and interest.

*For affirmance*— The Chief-Justice, Depue, Garrison, Mague, Reed, Van Syckel, Werts, Bogert, Brown, Clement, Smith, Whitaker — 12.

*For reversal*— Dixon—1.
#### EMPIREGAS, INC., OF PENSACOLA, Appellant, v. Harvey L. THOMAS, Appellee.

No. II-35.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 26, 1978.

Rehearing Denied June 22, 1978.

Benjamin W. Redding, of Barron, Red-ding, Boggs & Hughes, Panama City, for appellant.

Charles L. Hoffman, Jr., of Shell, Fleming, Davis & Menge, Pensacola, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant contends the trial court erred in failing to enforce a noncompetition clause in an employment agreement between it and appellee. We reluctantly agree and reverse. Section 542.12(2), Florida Statutes (1977), allows an employee to agree with his employer to “refrain from carrying on or engaging in a similar business and from soliciting old customers of such employer within a reasonably limited time and area.” The statute has been upheld by the Florida Supreme Court on several occasions. See *Capelouto v. Orkin Exterminating Co. of Fla., Inc.,*183 So.2d 532 (Fla. 1966), app. dism. 385 U.S. 11, 87 S.Ct. 78, 17 L.Ed.2d 10; *Miller Mechanical, Inc. v. Ruth,*300 So.2d 11 (Fla. 1974). This court, construing the statute in *Atlas Travel Service, Inc. v. Morelly,*98 So.2d 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 1957), stated:

> “The permissory language of the statute, whereby agreements of the character in suit ‘may’ in the ‘discretion’ of the court, ‘be enforced by injunction’ does not imply that the court is vested with any absolute or arbitrary discretion, and is construed as requiring that the discretion shall be reasonably exercised to the end that the object of the statute may not be nullified.”

With these precedents in mind, it is clear that the trial court abused its discretion here in failing to give effect to the agreement. The proof was sufficient to justify an injunction. We do not find, however, that there was sufficient proof of damages.

The order is therefore REVERSED as to injunctive relief and AFFIRMED as to damages. The case is remanded for the entry of an injunction.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32(a)

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 of Citizens Holding Company (the Company), as
filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), I, Greg L. McKee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                                                    
|------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Greg L. McKee                                  
|                   |  |  |  | Greg L. McKee President and Chief Executive Officer
# L_2023157EN.01003401.xml

| 20.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 157/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 157/34

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/1186

of 13 June 2023

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Kullings kalvdans’ (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Sweden’s application to register the name ‘Kullings kalvdans’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Sweden’s application to register the name ‘Kullings kalvdans’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no reasoned statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Kullings kalvdans’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no reasoned statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Kullings kalvdans’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Kullings kalvdans’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.4. Other products of animal origin (eggs, honey, various dairy products except butter, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 June 2023.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 55, 14.2.2023, p. 14.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
# DLA Distribution senior leaders visit DSCC 

/ Published Sept. 28, 2017
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Commander Army Brig. Gen. John Laskodi and members of his command staff toured the Defense Supply Center Columbus during a Sept. 26 operational assessment. 

The primary purpose of the visit was site familiarization while strengthening communication and engagement between DLA’s Major Subordinate Commands (MSCs). The trip included briefings from DLA Land and Maritime leaders and a visit to a distribution center followed by a tour of the installation’s Product Test Center.

Laskodi, who took command of DLA Distribution in June 2016, said he wants to visit every distribution center within the agency before he completes his tour of duty. 

“This is a great opportunity for us to come together with the Land and Maritime leadership today. We each bring unique perspectives to our mission – but we share the same goal,” Laskodi said. “We’re all committed to delivering the best capabilities to the Warfighter.”

After a 2010 study by the U.S. Department of Commerce determined elements of the military supply chain were being directly impacted by counterfeit electronics, DLA began enforcing stricter testing protocols and quality control measures. 

Since DLA procures and supplies microcircuits for a broad range of applications within weapons systems and support equipment, agency leaders determined an internal DNA marking facility was necessary to meet the strategic vision to “deliver the right solution on time, every time.”

The Product Test Center at DSCC established its DNA Identification and Marking Center in late 2014 and has marked more than one million microcircuits that support various military applications. 

Laskodi said the tour of the DNA marking lab was a highlight of the visit.

“The facility in Columbus gives us a centralized location for receiving, marking, storing and issuing material,” said Brad Bellis, deputy director of business operations for DLA Distribution. 

During a joint briefing between DLA Distribution and Land and Maritime key staff, the directors laid out their collaborative goals and addressed potential obstacles facing the agency. 

“I really appreciate the work that everyone contributed into making this event a success,” said DLA Land and Maritime Commander Navy Rear Adm. Michelle Skubic. “Our two MSC’s work together every day and it’s important for us to get together face-to-face like this to strengthen our relationships and improve our communication.”

DLA Distribution has a global footprint that includes locations in 20 states and eight countries. The distribution center at DSCC opened in December 2014.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energy & Engine Technology
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger N. Wurtele, CFO of the Company, do hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.

/s/ Roger N. Wurtele
Roger N. Wurtele
Chief Financial Officer

August 16, 2004


































                                       31