alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6965** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. CHASE REMINGTON TICKLE , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. William L. Osteen, Jr. , Chief District Judge. ( 1:14

- cr - 00101

- WO

- 1; 1:15

- cv - 00263

- WO

- LPA )

Submitted : November 17 , 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Chase Remington Tickle, Appellant Pro Se. Harry L. Hobgood, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Chase Remington Tickle seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit just ice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2012)
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) ; see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Tickle has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We disp ense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are3 adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**I, Russell K. Girling, Chief Executive Officer of TCPipeLines GP, Inc., the general partner of TC PipeLines, LP (the Partnership),in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hereby certify,**to the best of my knowledge, in connection with the Partnership’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) on the date hereof, that:

·                  the Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

·                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Partnership.

 
| Dated:     August 3, 2007 | /s/ Russell K. Girling                         |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                          | Russell K. Girling                             |
|                                          | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|                                          | TC PipeLines GP, Inc., as general partner of   |
|                                          | TC PipeLines, LP (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 21
                                  ----------
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                         ------------------------------


Name                                          State of Organization
----                                          ---------------------

US Oncology Corporate, Inc,                          Delaware
AOR Real Estate, Inc.                                Delaware
RMCC Cancer Center, Inc.                             Delaware
AOR Management Company of Indiana, Inc.              Delaware
AOR Holding Company of Indiana, Inc.                 Delaware
AOR of Indiana Management Partnership                Indiana
AOR Management Company of Oregon, Inc.               Delaware
AOR Management Company of Missouri, Inc.             Delaware
AOR Management Company of Arizona, Inc.              Delaware
AOR Management Company of Oklahoma, Inc.             Delaware
AOR Management Company of South Carolina, Inc.       Delaware
AOR Management Company of Pennsylvania, Inc.         Delaware
AOR Management Company of North Carolina, Inc.       Delaware
AOR Management Company of Virginia, Inc.             Delaware
AOR Management Company of New York, Inc.             Delaware
AOR Management Company of Florida, Inc.              Delaware
AOR Management Company of Nevada, Inc.               Delaware
AOR Management Company of Texas, Inc.                Delaware
AOR Management Company of Ohio, Inc.                 Delaware
AOR Management Company of Kansas, Inc.               Delaware
AOR Management Company of Central Florida, Inc.      Delaware
AORT Holding Company, Inc.                           Delaware
AOR of Texas Management Limited Partnership          Texas
AORIP, Inc.                                          Delaware
AOR Synthetic Real Estate, Inc.                      Delaware
Greenville Radiation Care, Inc.                      Delaware
Physician Reliance Network, Inc.                     Texas
TOPS Pharmacy Services, Inc.                         Texas
US Oncology Research, Inc.                           Texas
Physician Reliance Investments, LLC                  Delaware
PRN Physician Reliance, LLC                          Texas
Physician Reliance, L.P.                             Texas
AOR Management Company of Alabama, Inc.              Delaware
**-  North Atlantic  
-  Leetown, West Virginia 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">	You are here: 						Research / 								**Research Project:**GENETIC BASIS OF CYPRINID HERPES VIRUS-3 RESISTANCE IN COMMON CARP
**Location: Leetown, West Virginia**
												Project Number: 1930-31000-008-07Project Type:																				Reimbursable

Start Date: Dec 31, 2007End Date: Dec 30, 2010

**Objective:**To identify genes associated with viral disease resistance in Carp.
**Approach:**Candidate immune response genes will be added on to a genetic linkage map that will contain QTL for viral disease resistance in carp.
    Project TeamPalti, Yniv  
Related National Programs Aquaculture(106)  							Last Modified: 11/08/2008 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS109511 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1710 

To amend section 255 of the National Housing Act to remove the limitation 

on the number of reverse mortgages that may be insured under the 

FHA mortgage insurance program for such mortgages. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2005 

Mr. SANTORUM (for himself and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend section 255 of the National Housing Act to remove the limitation on the number of reverse mortgages 

that may be insured under the FHA mortgage insurance 

program for such mortgages. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reverse Mortgages to 

5 Help America’s Seniors Act’’. 
2 

•S 1710 IS

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF CAP ON NUMBER OF MORTGAGES 

2 INSURED. 

3 Section 255 of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 

4 1715z–20) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (g), by striking the first sen6 tence; and 

7 (2) in subsection (i)(1)(C), by striking ‘‘limita8 tions’’ and inserting ‘‘limitation’’. 

Æ
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alternate Energy Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-QSB_"), I,
Blaine Froats Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 11, 2004

/s/ Blaine Froats
---------------------------
Blaine Froats
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
      32.1





SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





In
      connection with the annual report of Global Food Technologies, Inc. ("Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), the undersigned, in the
      capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to their
      knowledge:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated
      August 1, 2007




/s/ Keith
              MeeksKeith
              Meeks, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Marshall F. SparksMarshall
              F. Sparks, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

<PAGE>

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-135230, 333-36764, 333-70745) of Oneida Financial Corp. of our
report dated March 27, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements
of Oneida Financial Corp., which report is included in the December 31, 2006
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Oneida Financial Corp.


                                           /s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC

                                           Crowe Chizek and Company LLC

Cleveland, Ohio
March 29, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                             5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from Winthrop
Growth  Investors  1 Limited  Partnership  1999  Fourth  Quarter  10-KSB  and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                            0000722565
<NAME>                           Winthrop Growth Investors 1 Limited Partnership
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000


<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                        1,889
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   674
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                       46,656
<DEPRECIATION>                               25,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               25,328
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                      20,806
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    2,817
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 25,328
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              7,722
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              7,760
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,811
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (38)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.47)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 167 (Thursday, August 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22980]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

Mammography Workshop

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the following 
public workshop: Mammography Workshop. The topics to be discussed are: 
Update on the Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA), State 
regulations on mammography, the medical physicist's responsibilities, 
FDA's MQSA compliance, the radiographic processor, and preparation for 
the MQSA inspection.
    Date and Time: The public workshop will be held on Tuesday, 
September 23, 1997, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; registration, 8 a.m. to 8:30 
a.m. Registration will close on September 16, 1997.
    Location: The public workshop will be held at the Medical Forum 
Bldg., 950 22d St. North, Birmingham, AL 35203, 205-458-8800.
    Contact: Ralph T. Trout, Food and Drug Administration (HFR-SE19), 
60 Eighth St. NE., Atlanta, GA 30309, 404-347-4001, ext. 5248, FAX 404-
347-4349.
    Registration: Send registration information (including name, title, 
firm name, address, telephone, and fax number) to the contact person by 
Tuesday, September 16, 1997. Space is limited, therefore interested 
parties are encouraged to register early.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact Ralph T. Trout at least 7 days in advance.
 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This workshop is being sponsored by FDA's 
Southeast Region and the radiological health programs of the States of 
the Southeast Region. These States are Alabama, Florida, Georgia, 
Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee, 
and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. The purpose 
of this workshop is to provide mammography facilities with an update on 
MQSA and technical training in the area of mammography.

    Dated: August 22, 1997.
William B. Schultz,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 97-22980 Filed 8-25-97; 4:44 pm]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45475-45476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22812]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33441]


Paducah & Louisville Railway--Trackage Rights Exemption--CSX 
Transportation, Inc.

    CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT) has agreed to grant overhead 
trackage rights to Paducah & Louisville Railway (P&L) between the P&L/
CSXT connection at Madisonville, KY, at or near milepost OOH 275, and 
the Diamond J Mine located on CSXT's Morganfield Branch, at or near 
milepost MB 294.1, including access to the Western Kentucky Railroad 
connection at Providence, KY, at or near milepost MB-291.8, for a total 
distance of approximately 18.8 miles in Hopkins and Webster Counties, 
KY.
    The transaction is scheduled to be consummated on August 25, 1997.
    The purpose of the trackage rights is to allow P&L to handle 
movements of coal from the Diamond J Mine and from the Pyro, Kentucky 
Mine to the BRT Terminal, at Jessup, KY, for blending and for barge 
movement beyond to the Tennessee Valley Authority water destinations, 
and to handle empties via the reverse route under contract PAL-C-0764.
    As a condition to this exemption, any employees affected by the 
trackage rights will be protected by the conditions imposed in Norfolk 
and Western Ry. Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as 
modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.--Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 
653 (1980).
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If it contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed 
at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically 
stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33441, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on (1) J. Thomas Garrett, Esq., Paducah & Louisville Railway, 
1500 Kentucky Avenue, Paducah, KY 42003, and (2) Fred R. Birkholz, 
Esq., CSX Transportation, Inc., 500 Water Street, J-150, Jacksonville, 
FL 32202.

    Decided: August 20, 1997.


[[Page 45476]]


    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22812 Filed 8-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
1 From: Barch.Madeline@epamail.epa.gov Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 11:26 AM To: Fairchild.Susan@epamail.epa.gov Cc: Hancy, Cindy Wang; Sarsony.Chris@epam ail.epa.gov; Manning.Elaine@epamail.epa.gov; Wiggins.Lanelle@epamail.epa.gov; Reeves, David Subject: Re: SBA, OP, and NAIMA's meeting to discuss EPA's UPL calculations

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

Categories: Red Category

Hi, Susan:

My impression from the meeting was that you and Angus Cr ane would be in contact to work out the specifics of a meeting. However, I would be happy to set up a conference call if that's what you'd prefer. For this first conversation, would you like to speak wi th Angus Crane only in order to discuss how to handle the CBI data and work out a plan moving forward? Who from EPA would you like to include on that call?

Best,

Madeline Barch Regulatory Management Divi sion, Office of Policy USEPA #6440EE Ariel Rios North P: 202.564.0234 F: 202.564.0965 E: barch.madeline@epa.gov

-----Susan Fairchild/RTP/USEPA/US wrote: -----
To: Madeline Barch/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Lanelle Wiggins/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: Susan Fairchild/RTP/USEPA/US Date: 06/20/2011 11:15AM Cc: chancy@rti.org

, dwreeves@rti.org , Chris Sarsony/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Elaine Manning/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Subject: SBA, OP, and NAIMA's meetin g to discuss EPA's UPL calculations

As you know, on Thursday June 16, NAIMA presented what they believed should be the emission limits for HAP from their mineral wool production pr ocesses. These were generally severa l orders of magnitude greater than the draft calculations provided by EPA.

We calculated the UPLs based on the test data provid ed by mineral wool companies on their voluntary ICR responses. NAIMA said they did the same.

It was noted several times during the meeting that the discrepancy needed to be resolved, and that a meeting was going to be set up to discuss the discrepancies.

During Thursday's meeting, I mentioned that the emission limits are expressed as lbs of pollutant per ton of melt, and because the testing was done with these units in mind, they reveal production data, which has been claimed as CBI by the industry. The companies will need to rescind their claim of CBI for the data to be discussed in the next meeting. However, emissions data can not be held as confiden tial, so the emissions alone are not CBI.

Has this meeting been set up? If so, for what date and time?

Susan Fairchild2 Environmental Scientist U.S. Environmental Protection Agency direct line: 919.541.5167 fax: 919.541-3207 email: fairchild.susan@epa.gov

Overnight mail address: US EPA Mail Code D243-02 109 TW Alexander Drive RTP, NC 27709

"We can not solve our problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them" --Albert Einstein