alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**OCT**
               JAN
				Feb11
				Next capture**2008**
               2010
				2011**8 captures**
           20 Sep 08 - 11 Jan 10
   Close
       Help


| |                                                          
| | ---------------------------------------------------------
| | Per Capita Income Rates in Appalachia, 2004(County Rates)

|Per capita income is a measure of the total personal 
income of an area divided by the resident population of the area. The 
map uses natural breaks in the distribution to organize the data into 
groups of common values.

Source and Methodology


      Downloadable filesPDF version of the map (330 KB)Excel file of supporting data for the map (78 KB) | This map shows the per capita income rate in each of the ARC counties. The Appalachian per capita income rates range from $14,885 to $39,605. The Appalachian average is $27,124. The U.S. average is $33,050. For a list of county data by state, see the downloadable Excel file.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Opportunities for Ohioans with Disabilities Job Fair

/ Published Oct. 25, 2018
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime participated in the Opportunities for Ohioans with Disabilities Job Fair Oct 17. The event was sponsored by the Bureau of Services for the Visually Impaired, Bureau of Vocational Rehabilitation and Division of Disability Determination. 

Representing DLA Land and Maritime were associates David Lanzillotta, David Anders and Lametra Dulaney. 

The job fair focus was introducing individuals with various disabilities to perspective employers. This fair allowed associates to inform job seekers about DLA and the many employment opportunities available. 

The job fair was staffed with qualified individuals to assist attendees depending on their disability communicate with companies. 

The fair started with a workshop discussing the obstacles a person with disabilities may encounter when applying for a position and how to correct these obstacles.  When the workshop was over, attendees went back to their tables to prepare for the opening. 

The DLA table attracted several individuals who expressed interest in working for DLA Land and Maritime and the federal government. 

The majority of questions were about the application process. A large amount of time was spent discussing federal government hiring tool USA Jobs and then DLA Land and Maritime. The many hiring programs promoted by DLA were also highlighted.
Exhibit 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the  Prospectuses
constituting  part of the  Registration  Statements  on Forms  S-3 and S-8 (Nos.
33-51439 and  33-55581)  and Form S-8 (Nos.  33-55585 and  33-57071) of SafeCard
Services, Incorporated, as amended and adopted by Ideon Group, Inc. and Form S-8
(No.  33-59247) and Forms S-3 and S-8 (No. 33-59249) of Ideon Group, Inc. of our
report dated February 2, 1996, appearing on page 37 of this Form 10-K.



PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Tampa, Florida
March 15, 1996
EX-32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Robert Waters, Director and the Chief Financial Officer of Golden Spirit
Minerals Ltd., a Delaware Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 16, 2004

/s/ Robert Waters
----------------
Robert Waters
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES‐OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Frank G. Hallowell, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10‐K/A of Image Sensing Systems, Inc. (the “Report”); and

2.             Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report.
| Date: April 29, 2020 |  | /s/ Frank G. Hallowell                       |
|----------------------|--|----------------------------------------------|
|                      |  | Name: Frank G. Hallowell                     |
|                      |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer               |
|                      |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the (1) Registration  Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-42870) pertaining to the Roseville Communications Company 2000
Equity  Incentive Plan and (2)  Registration  Statement (Form S-8  No.333-42868)
pertaining to the Roseville  Communications  Company 1999 Restricted Stock Bonus
Plan of our report  dated  February 9, 2001,  with  respect to the  consolidated
financial statements of Roseville  Communications Company included in its Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.


                                                            /s/Ernst & Young LLP


Sacramento, California
March 27, 2001
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 188

AN ACT

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to authorize

appropriations for fiscal years 2005 through 2011 to

carry out the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Criminal Alien

5 Assistance Program Reauthorization Act of 2005’’.
 †

2

S 188 ES

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL

2 YEARS 2005 THROUGH 2011.

3 Section 241(i)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality

4 Act (8 U.S.C. 1231(i)(5)) is amended by striking ‘‘appro5 priated’’ and all that follows through the period and in6 serting the following: ‘‘appropriated to carry out this

7 subsection—

8 ‘‘(A) such sums as may be necessary for

9 fiscal year 2005;

10 ‘‘(B) $750,000,000 for fiscal year 2006;

11 ‘‘(C) $850,000,000 for fiscal year 2007;

12 and

13 ‘‘(D) $950,000,000 for each of the fiscal

14 years 2008 through 2011.’’.

15 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS.

16 Section 241(i)(6) of the Immigration and Nationality

17 Act (8 U.S.C. 1231(i)(6)) is amended to read as follows:

18 ‘‘(6) Amounts appropriated pursuant to the au19 thorization of appropriations in paragraph (5) that

20 are distributed to a State or political subdivision of
†

3

S 188 ES

1 a State, including a municipality, may be used only

2 for correctional purposes.’’.

Passed the Senate May 23, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 188

AN ACT

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to

Alien Assistance Program.through 2011 to carry out the State Criminalauthorize appropriations for fiscal years 2005
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In Re: Appeal of Springfield :

Hospital :

Folio No. 42-00-06625-01 :

:

Appeal of: Prospect Crozer, LLC : No. 191 C.D. 2017

SECOND AMENDING ORDER

AND NOW, this 9

th day of March, 2018, the previous Amending 

Order issued on March 2, 2018 is hereby vacated as issued in error. The first full 

paragraph on page 10 of the majority opinion filed on February 13, 2018, is hereby 

amended to read as follows:

Neither argument is entirely accurate. As a Second Class A county, 

Delaware County is not subject to the Fourth to Eighth Class County Assessment 

Law, which makes In re Jubilee Ministries inapplicable. In addition, the 

Consolidated County Assessment Law (CCAL), Act of October 27, 2010, P.L. 895,

repealed the GCAL as to Second Class A counties. Unlike the GCAL, the CCAL 

permits interim assessments of an existing property only when the property has 

mistakenly been omitted from the assessment roll or there is a change in the 

assessment, neither of which applies to the present case. Because there is no 

statutory basis to allow an interim reassessment, the tax assessment day rule is still 

valid in Second Class A counties, which means the property remained exempt until 

January 1, 2017. See Global Links v. Keystone Oaks School District, 115 A.3d 418 
(Pa. Cmwlth. 2015) (holding that because of inconsistency between Section 10 of 

the Second Class County Assessment Law, 72 P.S. § 5452.10, and Section 505(b) 

of the GCAL, the tax assessment day rule is still valid for Second Class counties).

 

DAN PELLEGRINI, Senior Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000724621
<NAME> TEXAS MICRO INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           8,386
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,941
<ALLOWANCES>                                       833
<INVENTORY>                                      9,636
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,192
<PP&E>                                           9,768
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,113
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,024
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,055
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,257
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,024
<SALES>                                         61,060
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,992
<CGS>                                           42,496
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,737
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,640)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       104
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,744)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,744)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)
        

</TABLE>
No. 00-7229.

#### Garcia-Segura *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 
 OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES OXLEY ACT
 
 I, David Lieberman, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 of World Health Energy Holdings, Inc.;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
 
 (c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and
 
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls.
 
 Date: November 15, 2010
 
 By:
/s/ David LiebermanDavid LiebermanChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Carlton Parfitt, Chief Financial Officer of Golden Spirit Mining
Ltd. a Delaware Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended March 31, 2005 of Golden Spirit Mining Ltd.;

2.      Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a - 14 and 15d - 14) for the registrant and we have:

        a.      designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
	material information relating to the registrant, including its
	consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
	entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
	is being prepared;

        b.      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
	controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
	date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

        c.      presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
	effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
	evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

        a.      All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
	internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability
	to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
	identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
	internal controls; and

        b.      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
	other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
	controls; and

6.      The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 20, 2005

  /s/ Carlton Parfitt
      --------------
    Carlton Parfitt
     Director and Chief Financial Officer
```

[112th Congress Public Law 23]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 125 STAT. 237]]

Public Law 112-23
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 95 Dogwood Street in Cary, Mississippi, as the ``Spencer Byrd Powers, 
         Jr. Post Office''. <<NOTE: June 29, 2011 -  [S. 655]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SPENCER BYRD POWERS, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 95 Dogwood Street in Cary, Mississippi, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Spencer Byrd Powers, Jr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Spencer 
Byrd Powers, Jr. Post Office''.

    Approved June 29, 2011.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 655:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 157 (2011):
            May 16, considered and passed Senate.
            June 21, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
DENY and Opinion F iled Au gust 15 , 20 22

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 22
- 00795
- CV
IN RE TRACY NIXON , Relator
O riginal Proceeding from the 162nd Judicial District Co u rt

Dallas County, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Nowell , and Goldstein Opinion by Justice Nowell
Relator ’ s August 1 1, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus challenge s the administrative law judge ’ s denial of permissio n for relator, having p reviously been identified as a vexatious litigant , to file a petition in the trial court. Relator also file d a motion asking th is Court to obt ain records from the clerk ’ s office pertaining to her claim

. Based on our review of the p etition , attached doc u ment , and motion , we conclude that relator has failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure
52 in numerou s ways . See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52

. For example, r elator failed to provide a certified or sworn copy of every docume nt that is material to th e relator ’ s claim forrelief

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.7(a). Relator ’ s motion acknowledges that she is able

to obtain copies of the relevant docum ents herse lf

. Because relator ha s failed to comply with Texas Rule of App ellate Procedu re 52 and has failed t o provide an adequate record for our review, we deny the petition.
See I n re Butler , 270 S.W.3d 757, 759 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 2008, orig. proceeding). We likewise deny relator ’ s motion

.

220795f.p05 /s/ Erin A. Nowell ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
CERTIFICATION



I, David Chin, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of US Biodefense, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact, or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; and



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date:  October 14, 2004



/s/ David Chin

President

Chief Executive Officer