alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 

STATEMENT OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350 

        I,Peter C. Chang, the chief executive officer of Alliance Fiber Optic Products, Inc. (the“Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge, 

        (i)                 the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report"), fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

        (ii)                the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.
#### HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AVIATION AUTHORITY, Plaintiff, v. The BARTKE’S, INC., Defendant.

No. 69-280.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

June 25, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 15,1969.

Stewart C. Eggert, of Allen, Dell, Frank & Trinkle, Tampa, for plaintiff.

William Terrell Hodges, of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, for defendant.

MANN, Judge.

A question is certified which our former opinion, Bartke’s, Inc. v. Hillsborough County Aviation Authority, Fla.App.1969, 217 So.2d 885, raises. The issue centers around Bartke’s claimed right to first refusal on the restaurant and cocktail lounge facilities in the new Tampa airport terminal. The Aviation Authority contends that if the trial court must first determine whether such a right exists there is nothing to arbitrate. Bartke’s contends that its rights to a concession in the new terminal are arbitrable. They are not.

Whether there are in fact arbitrable issues we do not know. It is certain that Bartke’s claimed *contractual*right to the restaurant and cocktail lounge concession in the new terminal is refuted by the lease itself. And the allegation of an *equitable*right of first refusal may be entertained by the circuit court, in the present action. It is not a dispute arising out of the lease. We do not foreclose the possibility, however, that there either are or may be disputes which do arise out of the lease occasioned by the Authority’s removal of the lessee’s traffic to a new terminal. Our prior opinion, dealing solely with the effectiveness of the arbitration clause, was intended to direct the issuance of an order compelling *175arbitration of any such issue now or hereafter existing *under the lease.*

The dividing line is a simple one: issues relating to the new terminal, whether predicated upon alleged contractual or equitable rights, are justiciable in the circuit court; issues relating to Bartke’s lease in the present terminal are arbitrable. The 1962 lease plainly excludes any contractual rights in the new terminal.

LILES, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.
(dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com)
**Onion Statistics (94013)**
# McGee assumes command at DLA Distribution Korea

/ Published June 21, 2018
CAMP CARROLL, Korea, 
United States Army Lt. Col. James M. McGee assumed command of Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Korea in a June 21 ceremony officiated by DLA Pacific commander, Navy Capt. Timothy Daniels.

A native of Hammond, Louisiana, McGee began his career by enlisting in the Army as an Infantryman in 1992. He received a commission as a lieutenant in the Infantry from the ROTC program at Louisiana States University, and received a Bachelor of Arts in English from Southeastern Louisiana University in 2002. He also holds a master’s degree in Organizational Psychology from Columbia University.

McGee’s previous assignments include: chief of operations, 528th Sustainment Brigade, 1st Special Forces Command, Ft. Bragg, North Carolina; J7, chief of training, NATO Rapid Deployable Corps, Istanbul, Turkey; support operations officer and battalion executive officer, 407th Brigade Support Battalion, 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, Ft. Bragg, North Carolina; tactical officer, United States Military Academy, West Point, New York; J33 Current Operations Battle Major, United States Forces, Baghdad, Iraq; battalion operations officer, field maintenance company commander, battalion adjutant, electronic maintenance officer, and automotive platoon leader, 782nd Brigade Support Battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, Ft. Bragg, North Carolina; executive officer and rifle platoon leader, Charlie Company, 1st Battalion, 506th Infantry Battalion (Air Assault), Camp Greaves, Korea.

Additionally, he served as a peacekeeper with the Multinational Force and Observers, Sinai, Egypt. He participated in the TF All American humanitarian assistance mission in support of Hurricane Katrina relief efforts in New Orleans, Louisiana. He deployed with the 782nd Brigade Support Battalion in support of Operation Enduring Freedom, and as a logistics advisor on a Military Transition Team in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. 

McGee’s awards and decorations include the Bronze Star Medal, Defense Meritorious Service Medal, Meritorious Service Medal, Army Accommodation Medal, Joint Service Achievement Medal, Army Achievement Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Afghanistan Campaign Medal, Iraq Campaign Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, Korean Defense Service Medal, Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Medal, NATO Medal, Multinational Force and Observers Medal, Combat Action Badge, Expert Infantryman Badge, Master Parachutist Badge, and Air Assault Badge.
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
  PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dennis Higgs, President and Chief Executive Officer of
  Miranda Gold Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18
  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company, for
        the year ended August 31, 2003, and to which this certification is attached
        as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
        and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                

| | By:    | /s/ Dennis Higgs                  
| | ------ | ----------------------------------
| |        |                                   
| | Name:  | DENNIS HIGGS                      
| |        |                                   
| | Title: | PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
| |        |                                   
| | Date:  | January 14, 2004                  

---
Pee Dee National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan 

P

e

e D

e

e

N

a

tio

n

al Wildlif

e R

e

f

u

g

e

Comprehensive Conservation Plan

Pee DeeNational Wildlife RefugeComprehensive Conservation Plan

USFWS Photos USFWS Photos

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
guidance for

d strategies

e Fish and

e plans detail

ally above

for Service

s. The plans do

erational and

uisition.
P.1 

OAR Box 1500 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

40) ll-C-66 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 8/5/2008 1:51:28 PM Sheet 40 of 343 
P.2 

A-94-5Z 

11 C-6§ 

Date sent: ThU, 26 Jun 1997 09:47:17 -0400 

From: MADELEINE STRUM < STRUM.MADELEINE@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV > 

To: stevemcn@erols.com, jschweit@socplas.org 

Copies to: kmeardon @ rtp.pes.com, mproctor@ rtp.pes.com 

Subject: summary of the May 9,1997 meeting 

Attached is a WP5.1 file containing the summary ofthe briefing we had with you 

on May 9. I've not sent it to Nancy, Nelson or Richard, so if you could do this I 

would appreciate it. 

Thanks, 

Madeleine 
P.3 

Docket No. A-<}^-5 

Subcategory II-cl 

The enclosures with this document are docket item No. II-iT- Q *\ 

2
Upper Ouachita and Handy Brake

National Wildlife Refuges

and the Louisiana Wetlands Management District, Louisiana

Refuge Manager: Brett Hortman

11372 Highway 143 

Farmerville, LA 71363-0201 

PHONE: (318) 726-4400

FAX: (318) 726-4667

E-mail: northlarefuges@fws.gov

March 2008
#### Juanita HARDWICK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-2656.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 11, 1978.

*266Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Kurt Mamar, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Steven Bolotin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON, J., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PEARSON, Judge.

The probationer, Juanita Hardwick, appeals a sentence imposed upon the revocation of her probation on the ground that because it was imposed after she had already been sentenced, it was, therefore, void because it placed her in double jeopardy for the violation. See *Troupe v. Rowe,*283 So.2d 857 (Fla.1973); *Katz v. State,*335 So.2d 608 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); and *Beckom v. State,*227 So.2d 232 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969). We agree and, accordingly, reverse the sentence and remand the cause for the re-establishment-of the first sentence.

At the probation violation hearing, the probationer admitted one of the alleged violations and the court orally sentenced her to serve one year in the county jail with provisions made for her drug problem and her pregnancy. A handwritten notation of the sentence was entered by the clerk and the defendant was turned over to officers of the Dade County Department of Correction and Rehabilitation to begin serving her sentence. Subsequent thereto, the defendant was guilty of misconduct in the courtroom which would constitute contempt.1 Thereupon, the trial court vacated the first sentence and entered a new sentence for three years in the state penitentiary.

A defendant may be sentenced for a contempt committed in the presence of the court, but such a sentence must be entered pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.830; and *Manning v. State,*234 So.2d 16 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970).. The contempt does not allow a reconsideration of the sentence already imposed. See the *Troupe, Katz*and *Beckom*cases cited above. Accordingly, the defendant’s second sentence to three years in the state penitentiary is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for the execution of the sentence of one year in the county jail as originally imposed. This decision does not bar such action as the court may find proper for the contempt committed.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

1

. “THE COURT: Excuse me. Did I see what I thought I did? Did she hit you?

> “THE PROBATION OFFICER: Yes.

> “THE COURT: Do you have any reason that you can give to me why you shouldn’t be held in contempt of this Court?

> “There being no response, you are adjudicated in contempt of this Court. And in addition to the one year sentence heretofore imposed, that sentence is vacated. Sentence the defendant to three years in the state penitentiary. All right.”
No. 00-7053.

#### Marsh *v.*Newton, Warden, et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
AMENDMENT TO  PROCESSING AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT TO PROCESSING AGREEMENTis made and entered into this 7th day of October, 2003, between Akorn, Inc., a
Louisiana Corporation ("Akorn") and NeoPharm, Inc., a Delaware Corporation ("NeoPharm").

WHEREAS,NeoPharm and Akorn have entered into that certain Processing Agreement, dated December 20, 2001 (the "Processing
Agreement"); and

WHEREAS,Neopharm and Akorn desire to amend the Processing Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE,in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

1.Amendment.Section 5.1 of the Processing Agreement shall be amended as follows:
the words "June 30, 2003" shall be stricken and replaced with the words "October 1, 2004"

2.No Other Amendments.All other terms shall be as provided in the Processing Agreement.

*    *    *    *    *    *    *    *

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have caused this agreement to be executed as of the day and year first written above.

|AKORN, INC. |  | NEOPHARM, INC.
|----------- |  | --------------
|By:         |  |               
|Its:        |  |               

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit31.3**

 

CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

I, Gregg Buckbinder,Chief Financial and Operating Officer and principal financial officer ofMillburn Ridgefield Corporation, the Managing Owner of The Millburn WorldResource Trust (the “Trust”), do hereby certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-K of The Millburn World Resource Trust;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented inthis annual report;

 

4. The Trust’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Trust and have:

 

(a)  designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the Trust, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is beingprepared;

 

(b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the Trust’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a datewithin 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “EvaluationDate”); and

 

(c) presentedin this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.  The Trust’s other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Trust’s auditorsand the audit committee of the Trust’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

(a) all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the Trust’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial data and have identified for the Trust’s auditors any materialweaknesses in internal controls; and

 

(b) anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Trust’s internal controls; and

 

6.  The Trust’s other certifying officers and Ihave indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significantchanges in internal controls or in other factors that could significantlyaffect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.

 
| By:  /s/ Gregg Buckbinder         |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Gregg Buckbinder                       |
| Chief Financial and  Operating Officer |
| March 30, 2005                         |

 

----
1

Filed 10/2 8 /14 P. v. James CA1/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

MICHAEL D. JAMES,

Defendant and Appellant. A141755

(Solano County

Super. Ct. No. VCR216366)

Defendant Michael D. James appeals from a judgment entered on his plea. His

counsel asked this court for an independent review of the record to determine whether

there are any arguable issues. ( Peo ple v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) James was

informed of his right to file a supplemental brief and did not do so. We conclude there

are no arguable issues and affirm.

James was charged with 11 felony c ounts of second degree robbery based on a

series o f crime s he and others committed in Vallejo during the fall of 2012

. 1 Three of the

counts were accompanied by enhancement allegations that he per sonally used a rifle, and

three were accompanied by enhancement allegations that he was armed with a rifle. 2

Under a plea agreement, he pleaded no contest to one of the robbery counts and to the

1 Each count was brought under Penal Code section 211. All further statutory references

are to the Penal Code.

2 The enhancements were alleged under sections 12022.5, subdivision (a)(1) an d

12022.53, subdivision (b) ( personal use) and section 12022, subdivision (a)(1) ( being

armed ).2

allegation that he personally used a rifle during that offense

, 3 and the remaining counts

and enhancement allegations were dismissed with a waiver under People v. Harvey

(1979) 25 Cal.3d 754

. The trial court sentenced him to 15 years in state prison,

comprised of the upper term of five years for the robbery and a term of ten years for the

personal

- use enhancement, and ordered him to pay various fines and fees.

No error appears in the entry of the plea or in the sentencing proceedings. James

was advised of his constitutional rights and the con sequences of his plea before entering

it , and he acquiesced to receiving a sentence of 15 years instead of the 12 years he was

or iginally promised under the plea agreement

. The trial court found that his waiver of

rights was knowing and intelligent, that the plea was free and voluntary, and that there

was a factual basis for the plea. He was represented by counsel throughout the

p roceedings.

There are no meritorious issues to be argued on appeal. The judgment is affirmed.

_________________________ Humes, P.J.

We concur:

_________________________ Dondero, J.

_________________________ Banke, J.

3 The plea to the enhancement alleg ation was only under section 12022.53, subdivision

(b).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46399-46400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23203]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA, Inc. Joint Special Committee 181/Eurocare Working Group-13 
Standards of Navigational Performance

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for 
Joint Special Committee 181/EUROCAE Working Group (WG)-13 meeting to be 
held September 22-26, 1997, starting at 9:00

[[Page 46400]]

a.m. The meeting will be held at the Maritim Hotel, Ulm, Germany. The 
hotel can be reached at 49-731-9230 (phone) or 49-731-923-1000 (fax). 
The host is Abdul Tahir, DASA, at 49-731-392-3106 (phone) or 49-731-
392-3030 (fax).
    The agenda will include the following: September 22: 9:00 a.m.-4:30 
p.m., All Working Groups Meet Separately; September 23: 9:00 a.m.-4:30 
p.m., All Working Groups Meet Separately. September 24: 9:00 a.m.-4:30 
p.m., Plenary: Review of DO-200A. September 25: 9:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m., 
Plenary: Review of DO-201A; 1:00 p.m.-4:30 p.m., Closing Plenary 
Session: (1) Review and Approval of Minutes of Previous Meeting; (2) 
Chairman's Remarks; (3) Working Group Status Reports; (4) Date and 
Place of Next Meeting; (5) New Business; (6) Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 1020, Washington, D.C. 20036; 
(202) 833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org 
(web site). Members of the public may present a written statement to 
the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 25, 1997.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 97-23203 Filed 8-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
|   | RE: | Marco      Community Bancorp, Inc.’s Registration Statement  on |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | • | The      Articles of Incorporation of MCBI, as filed with the Secretary of State of      the State of Florida; |
|--------|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | • | The      Bylaws of MCBI; |
|--------|---------|--------------------------|

|   | • | Minutes      of a meeting of MCBI’s Board of Directors, certified as correct and      complete by the Chief Executive Officer of MCBI, authorizing the sale of      up to 1,000,000 shares of commonstock; |
|--------|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | • | Certificate      of Active Status with respect to MCBI, issued by the Secretary of State of      the State of Florida; and |
|--------|---------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | • | The      registration statement, including all exhibits  thereto. |
|--------|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | • | MCBI      has been duly incorporated and is validly existing under the laws of the      State of Florida; and |
|--------|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | • | The      1,000,000 shares of common stock covered by the registration statement      have been legally authorized and when issued in accordance with the terms      described in said registration statement, will be validly issued, fully      paid and non-assessable. |
|--------|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

|   | Sincerely,                       |
|--------|----------------------------------|
|   |                             |
|   | IGLER      & DOUGHERTY, P.A. |