alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# 21st Theater Support Command Senior Enlisted Advisor visits DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania

/ Published Oct. 29, 2018
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 21st Theater Sustainment Command’s Senior Enlisted Advisor, Command Sgt. Maj. Rocky Carr, visited DLA Distribution Susquehanna Pennsylvania, Oct. 11.  The purpose of his visit was to receive an orientation of DLA Distribution’s mission and function, tour the Eastern Distribution Center, receive operations briefings, and visit with personnel.
Presidential Documents

587

Federal Register

Vol. 62, No. 2

Friday, January 3, 1997

Title 3—

The President

Notice of January 2, 1997

Continuation of Libyan Emergency

On January 7, 1986, by Executive Order No. 12543, President Reagan declared

a national emergency to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat

to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted

by the actions and policies of the Government of Libya. On January 8,

1986, by Executive Order No. 12544, the President took additional measures

to block Libyan assets in the United States. The President has transmitted

a notice continuing this emergency to the Congress and the Federal Register

every year since 1986. The most recent notice appeared in the Federal

Register on January 5, 1996.

The crisis between the United States and Libya that led to the declaration

of a national emergency on January 7, 1986, has not been resolved. The

Government of Libya has continued its actions and policies in support

of terrorism, despite the calls by the United Nations Security Council, in

Resolutions 731 (1992), 748 (1992), and 883 (1993), that it demonstrate

by concrete actions its renunciation of such terrorism. Such Libyan actions

and policies pose a continuing unusual and extraordinary threat to the

national security and vital foreign policy interests of the United States.

For these reasons, the national emergency declared on January 7, 1986,

and the measures adopted on January 7 and January 8, 1986, to deal with

that emergency, must continue in effect beyond January 7, 1997. Therefore,

in accordance with Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50

U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing the national emergency with respect to

Libya. This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted

[FR Doc. 97–230

THE WHITE HOUSE,

January 2, 1997.

to the Congress.

œ–

Filed 1–2–97; 10:53 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of SureWest Communications (the Company), on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 10, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Brian H. StromBrian H. Strom,President and Chief
Executive Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SureWest
Communications and will be retained by SureWest Communications and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certificate is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an
exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-K.
# L_2023208EN.01000101.xml

| 23.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 208/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 208/1

---

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2023/1650

of 15 May 2023

correcting the Swedish language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/389 supplementing Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for strong customer authentication and common and secure open standards of communication

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on payment services in the internal market, amending Directives 2002/65/EC, 2009/110/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, and repealing Directive 2007/64/EC (1), and in particular Article 98(4), second subparagraph, thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Swedish language version of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/389 (2) contains errors in Articles 30, 31 and 36 as regards the types of service providers concerned by a specific requirement. Those errors affect the substance of those provisions. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Swedish language version of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/389 (2) contains errors in Articles 30, 31 and 36 as regards the types of service providers concerned by a specific requirement. Those errors affect the substance of those provisions.

| (2) | The Swedish language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/389 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Swedish language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/389 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

(Does not concern the English language.)

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 May 2023.

For the Commission

The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 337, 23.12.2015, p. 35.

1

(2)  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/389 of 27 November 2017 supplementing Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for strong customer authentication and common and secure open standards of communication (OJ L 69, 13.3.2018, p. 23).

2

---
CERTIFICATION



I, David Chin, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of US Biodefense, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact, or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; and



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date:  October 21, 2005



/s/ David Chin

President

Chief Executive Officer
254 La. 8

#### Aliston STEPHNEY v. Borlande D. ROBERTSON and Alvin B. Werner W. R. C. Construction Company, Inc.

No. 49773.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 9, 1969.

In re: Borlande D. Robertson and Alvin B. Werner applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 219 So.2d 9.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> 
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Financial
Statements  for the year  ended  December  31,  1998,  and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such Financial Statements filed with form 10KSB and for
the annual period ended December 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       18,633
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 1,916
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             22,125
<PP&E>                                       96,786
<DEPRECIATION>                              (35,699)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              380,140
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       434,793
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                  1,689,597
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                        0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                380,140
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              3,722
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            795,003
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          122,950
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (914,239)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                               (914,239)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 168 (Friday, August 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23026]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573.

Isabel C. Bacallao, 1180 West 33rd Street, Hialeah, FL 33012, Sole 
Proprietor
Industrial Connections, Inc., 1428 Saranell Avenue, Naperville, IL 
60540, Ju Meng, President
Continuity Corporation d/b/a, Alamo Forwarding, 2305 Sage Road, Suite 
39, Houston, TX 77056. Officers: Felton Overbey, President, Michael 
Overbey, Vice President
DAMAK Leasing & Financial Inc. d/b/a, DAMAK Enterprises Inc., 20 
Commerce Street, Suite 14-15, Flemington, NJ 08822. Officers: Daniel Di 
Sisto, President, Ann Marie Di Sisto, Secretary.

    Dated: August 26, 1997.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23026 Filed 8-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
#### Joseph TRIPI, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-419.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 17, 1970.

Rehearing Denied May 7, 1970.

G. Milton Rubin, North Miami Beach, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Melvin Grossman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

By an information the appellant was charged with the crime of breaking and entering a dwelling house with intent to commit a felony, to-wit: grand larceny. When arraigned he pleaded not guilty and waived trial by jury. He was tried before the court, found guilty and sentenced to confinement for a period of one year. On appeal therefrom the appellant contends that the trial court erred in refusing to grant a directed verdict in favor of the defendant for the reason that the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction, and that the court committed reversible error by admitting into evidence certain items, to-wit: a knife with a broken blade, and a broken portion of a knife blade. On consideration of those contentions in the light of the record and briefs we find them to be without merit and affirm.

There was no objection at the trial to the introduction into evidence of the knife found at the scene. The objection made to the introduction of the separate broken portion of the knife blade found at the scene was on the ground that it had not been shown by testimony to be a matching portion of the blade of the knife. Testimony of a witness introduced by the *16state to deal with that fact was excluded on objection by the defendant that the witness was not qualified as an expert thereon. We agree with the contention of the state that the broken knife blade point was admissible in evidence as an item found at the scene, for comparison with the broken knife blade, to have such evidentiary weight as the trier of fact should accord thereto. Without attempting to restate the evidence disclosed in the record we hold it was sufficient to support the trial judge in finding against the defendant on the issue as to the commission of the alleged crime and the identity of the defendant, as the perpetrator thereof.

Affirmed.
No. 00-6752.

#### Gandolfo *v.*Fountain, Warden.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
; Generated by FastSum - an extremely fast checksum utility.
; Go to www.fastsum.com to get your own copy for free.
;
3418A2661450159CD5C86A6103C70681 *diabetes_broc_span.pdf
#### Robert BUTLER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1037.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 19, 1977.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Julian S. Mack, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arthur Joel Berger, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was granted a delayed appeal pursuant to *Baggett v. Wainwright,*229 So.2d 239 (Fla.1969). On the appeal, the single point presented urges reversal upon the ground that the original object from which his latent fingerprint was lifted was not produced in court. While no case supporting this proposition has been cited, it should be noted that the evidence showed that the object was not available to the State at the time of trial. No error has been shown. Cf. *United States v. Sewar,*468 F.2d 236 (9th Cir. 1972); *United States v. Herndon,*536 F.2d 1027 (5th Cir. 1976); *628and *Smith v. State, 305*So.2d 868 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.
<Page>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

     I, Ronald J. Turner, President and Chief Executive Officer of TC
PipeLines GP, Inc., the general partner of TC PipeLines, LP (the
Partnership), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hereby certify in connection
with the Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) on the date hereof, that:

     o   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     o   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Partnership.

Dated: November 13, 2003

                                     /s/ Ronald J. Turner
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                     Ronald J. Turner
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer
                                     TC PipeLines GP, Inc., as general partner
                                     of TC PipeLines, LP
#### Paul Lawrence GARCIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. Edward Simon SAVAGE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 77-1719 and 77-1720.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 21, 1978.

Chambers & Hayes, Homestead, for appellants.

Office of the State’s Atty., Jeff D. Gautier, State’s Atty., Key West, and Andrew Tobin, Asst. State’s Atty., Tavernier, for appellee.

Before KEHOE, J., and BOYD, JOSEPH A., Jr., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants appeal on order by the trial court denying their motions to expunge the record. By our order of November 21, 1977, we consolidated these appeals for all appellate purposes.

Garcia entered a plea of guilty of Grand Larceny. The trial court withheld an adju*228dication of guilt and placed him on probation for 18 months.

Savage pleaded guilty to possession of a short-barreled shotgun. The trial court withheld an adjudication of guilt and placed him on probation for one year.

Both appellants successfully completed their probationary period and filed motions to expunge the record pursuant to Section 901.33, Florida Statutes (1975). Neither had previously been convicted of a criminal offense. The trial court denied both motions.

We reverse and remand to the trial court for the sealing of the court records from public view in accordance with *Johnson v. State,*336 So.2d 93 (Fla.1976).

Reversed and remanded with directions.
254 La. 16

#### Smith DUNCAN v. Leon PESNELL.

No. 49776.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 9, 1969.

In re: Leon Pesnell applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Jackson. 219 So.2d 846.

Writ refused. The judgment is not final. Relator has a remedy in the event of an adverse judgment.
EXHIBIT 31(b) 

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

**(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

I, Robert T. Smith, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Citizens HoldingCompany; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: 

 

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 12, 2003 

 

/s/    ROBERT T.SMITH        

Robert T. Smith

Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer