alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### GREATER BATON ROUGE AIRPORT DISTRICT et al. v. Mrs. Florence Hobgood HAYS et al.

No. 11634.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Nov. 21, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 28, 1977.

Writ Refused Feb. 10, 1978.

Joseph F. Keogh, Parish Atty., Baton Rouge, of counsel, for plaintiffs-appellees Greater Baton Rouge Airport District et al.

Ashton L. Stewart, Baton Rouge, of counsel, for defendants-appellants Mrs. Florence Hobgood Hays et al.

Before LOTTINGER, EDWARDS and PONDER, JJ.

2

. La., 341 So.2d 403 (1977).

PONDER, Judge.

Defendants appealed from a judgment denying interest on an expropriation award prior to the date of judgment.

The issue is the effect of concurring reasons given in the denial of a writ of certio-rari or review. We affirm.

In October, 1972, plaintiff by agreement with the defendants entered on defendants’ land to cut some trees in line with the runway at the Greater Baton Rouge Airport. In December, 1973, plaintiff filed an expropriation suit for an avigation servitude; this was granted in November, 1975. The judgment rejected defendants’ demands for interest from October, 1972, but did allow interest from the date of filing of suit. This Court amended the judgment to allow interest from the date of judgment only.1 The Supreme Court acted on the application for writs as follows:

> “Writ denied. The result is correct.

> Additional concurring reasons.

> We construe the judgment of the Court of Appeal as an award of the avigation servitude to the plaintiffs and a money judgment in favor of defendants.

1

. 339 So.2d 431 (1st Cir. 1976).

SUMMERS, J.,

concurring. I am of the opinion the money judgment awarded defendants the interest which defendants contend is due.

DENNIS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.”2

Defendants contend that this action had the effect of a summary judgment amending the decision of the Court of Appeal so as to allow them interest from October, 1972. The lower court did not agree nor do we.

Admittedly, the Supreme Court has supervisory power over all other courts.3*358Its rules allow the grant of summary relief when a writ is granted.4 In the instant case, however, the writ was denied. The concurring additional reasons, even if subject to the interpretation made by defendants, do not outweigh the positive effect of:

“Writ denied. The result is correct.”

This left effective the judgment of the Court of Appeal allowing interest only from the date of judgment. The lower court was correct in denying the relief sought.

AFFIRMED.

3

.Art. 5, Sec. 5(A), LSA Const. (1974):

> “Section 5. (A) * * * The Supreme Court has general supervisory jurisdiction over all other courts. It may establish proce*358dural and administrative rules not in conflict with law . . .

4

. Rule X, Sec. 3 of the Louisiana Supreme Court Rules:

> “Section 3.

> ******

> (b) At the time the writ is granted, the court may order summary relief. * * * ”
Exhibit 32.1

 

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of View Systems Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Gunther Than, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

By /s/ Gunther Than

Gunther Than

Director, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

August 3, 2017
#### Johnny Bell IRVING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. HH-283.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 26, 1978.

Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen. and William E. Whitley, Asst. State Atty., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully examined the record on appeal and briefs filed by able counsel. We find therefrom that each point here presented has been heretofore determined by decisions of the Appellate Courts of Florida, including the Supreme Court of Florida. Nothing would be added to the jurisprudence of this state by again discussing those points here.

Appellant having failed to demonstrate prejudicial error, the judgment and sentence appealed are

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
Order entered July 22, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00339-CV

PONDEROSA PINE ENERGY, LLC, NIXON PEABODY, LLP, AND SHANNON, 

GRACEY, RATLIFF & MILLER, LLP, Appellants

V.

ILLINOVA GENERATING COMPANY N/K/A ILLINOVA CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10-04536

ORDER

Appellants are represented by Texas counsel, Joseph W. Spence and B. Frank Cain, and 

out-of-state counsel, Frank H. Penski, Constance M. Boland, and Abigail T. Reardon. Together, 

they have filed appellants’ brief on the merits. They have also filed an unopposed motion, 

pending before us, for extension of time to file reply brief. Our records do not reflect Mr. 

Penski, Ms. Boland, and Ms. Reardon have filed in this appeal a motion for admission pro hac 

vice in accordance with rule XIX(a) and (c) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar of 

Texas. See TEX. R. GOVERNING BAR ADMISSION XIX(a),(c); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 

82.0361(b) (West 2013) (requiring payment of non-resident attorney fee). Accordingly, they are 

not allowed to participate in the proceedings in this cause. However, because the brief is signed 

by Mr. Cain, it is considered duly filed. Further, because the motion is signed by Mr. Spence, we 
GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than August 4, 2015. Should out-ofstate counsel wish to participate in this appeal, they shall file the required motion. 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Troy PRINE v. Ross MAGGIO, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 60919.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 1977.

In re: Troy Prine applying for writ of certiorari. Parish of East Carroll.

Denied. See *State ex rel. Prine v. Maggio, Warden,*La., 351 So.2d 1212.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46474-46475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23320]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Kentucky Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Kentucky Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 12:00 
p.m. and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, September 17, 1997, at the 
Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District, 700 West 
Liberty Street (at 7th Street), Louisville, Kentucky

[[Page 46475]]

40203. The purpose of the meeting is to: (1) Hold a press conference to 
release the report, Bias and Bigotry in Kentucky; (2) discuss the 
status of the Commission and civil rights progress/problems in Kentucky 
and the Nation; and (3) discuss plans for adopting a new project.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Emily C. Boone, 
502-585-3430, or Bobby D. Doctor, Director of the Southern Regional 
Office, 404-562-7000 (TDD 404-562-7004). Hearing-impaired persons who 
will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language 
interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least five (5) 
working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, August 21, 1997.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-23320 Filed 9-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
MIRANDA GOLD CORP.


Unit 1 – 15782 Marine Drive


White Rock, B.C. V4B 1E6





Tel:  (604) 536-2711


Fax: (604) 536-2788





Certification of CFO Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Miranda Gold Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Doris Meyer, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of her knowledge, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:           December 15, 2011




“signed” Doris Meyer


______________________________________________


Doris Meyer, Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STRIKER BOATS, INC., and Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Petitioners, v. Mack NUBY, and FIC, Respondents.

No. 38519.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 25, 1969.

Reed A. Bryan, of McCune, Hiaasen, Crum & Ferris, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioners.

Mark Marks, Miami Beach, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 12, 1969.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23361]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5887-3]


Notice of Proposed Settlement for Cherokee Oil Sites, Mecklenbury 
County, North Carolina

AGENCY: Environmental Agency.

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
settle claims for response costs under Section 122(g) of the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 
1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 9622(g), with the State of North Carolina 
for a de minimis settlement. This claim relates to removal and response 
actions undertaken by EPA at the Cherokee Resources Sites on Berryhill 
Road and Summit Avenue in Charlotte, Mecklenbury County, North 
Carolina.
    EPA will consider public comments on the proposed settlement which 
are received by EPA within thirty (30) days of the date of this notice. 
EPA may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed settlement if such 
comments disclosed facts or considerations which indicate the proposed 
settlement is inappropriate, improper or inadequate.
    A copy of the proposed settlement is available from Ms. Paula V. 
Batchelor at the address below. Written comments may be submitted to 
Ms. Batchelor at the same address within thirty (30) days of the date 
of publication.

Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 
Waste Management Division, Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street, 
S.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3104, 404/562-8887

    Dated: August 21, 1997.
Robert Johnson,
Waste Management Division.
[FR Doc. 97-23361 Filed 9-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alan L. Hunte, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Trenwick Group Ltd., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Trenwick Group Ltd. Date: May 14, 2003


        /s/ Alan L. Hunte
        ---------------------------
        Alan L. Hunte
        Executive Vice President
        and Chief Financial Officer
#### County Economic Status, Fiscal Year 2008

Download a complete Excel file of these results.
 **Three-Year Average Unemployment Rate, 2003-2005****Per Capita Market Income, 2004****Poverty Rate, 2000****Three-Year Avg. Unemp. Rate, Percent of U.S. Avg., 2003-2005****Per Capita Market Income, Percent of U.S. Average, 2004****Poverty Rate, Percent of U.S. Average, 2000****United States**5.5%$28,18712.4%100.0%100.0%100.0%**Appalachian Region**5.6%$21,58713.6%100.6%76.6%110.2%**STATE TOTALS****Alabama**4.9%$22,57816.1%88.5%80.1%130.1%**Georgia**4.9%$25,80813.0%89.5%91.6%104.9%**Kentucky**6.0%$22,03915.8%107.6%78.2%127.8%**Maryland**4.3%$35,2878.5%77.8%125.2%68.6%**Mississippi**6.9%$19,16319.9%124.2%68.0%161.0%**New York**5.7%$31,39814.6%103.6%111.4%117.9%**North Carolina**5.7%$24,56812.3%103.5%87.2%99.2%**Ohio**6.1%$25,98410.6%110.3%92.2%85.6%**Pennsylvania**5.4%$27,43611.0%97.0%97.3%88.7%**South Carolina**6.8%$22,15114.1%122.6%78.6%114.0%**Tennessee**5.6%$24,67513.5%100.7%87.5%108.9%**Virginia**3.7%$32,3669.6%67.6%114.8%77.5%**West Virginia**5.4%$18,86417.9%98.0%66.9%144.6%**STATE APPALACHIAN TOTALS**Click on the links below to get information on that state's Appalachian Counties.Appalachian Alabama4.7%$23,95214.4%84.6%85.0%115.9%Appalachian Georgia4.3%$23,6789.2%78.3%84.0%74.7%Appalachian Kentucky7.0%$14,26124.4%125.8%50.6%197.4%Appalachian Maryland5.1%$21,28411.7%91.6%75.5%94.1%Appalachian Mississippi7.6%$17,07319.4%136.8%60.6%156.9%Appalachian New York5.3%$19,62513.6%96.3%69.6%110.1%Appalachian North Carolina5.6%$21,91611.7%101.3%77.8%94.7%Appalachian Ohio7.1%$18,94613.6%127.5%67.2%109.8%Appalachian Pennsylvania5.8%$23,50211.4%105.0%83.4%92.1%Appalachian South Carolina6.7%$22,79611.7%121.8%80.9%94.7%Appalachian Tennessee5.4%$21,36214.2%98.5%75.8%114.4%Appalachian Virginia4.7%$18,21615.7%85.2%64.6%127.1%Appalachian West Virginia5.4%$18,86417.9%98.0%66.9%144.6%
# Event puts creative spin on domestic violence awareness

/ Published Oct. 8, 2018
Richmond, Va., 
Come out and break a sweat while bringing awareness to the issue of domestic violence at this year’s Spin for the Cause/Breaking the Cycle of Domestic Violence. A joint venture between Defense Logistics Agency Installation Operations Richmond and the U.S. Army Reserve 80th Training Command, Spin for the Cause encourages physical and mental fitness to help overcome obstacles and gain empowerment.

“When we increase awareness about domestic violence, we decrease the shame associated,” said Africa Miller, family advocacy program manager and social worker, Morale, Welfare, and Recreation Office, DLA Installation Operations Richmond. “Shame makes it difficult to discuss domestic violence, seek help and reach out to others for support.”

Spin for the Cause/Breaking the Cycle of Domestic Violence kicked off on Oct. 3, when 25 soldiers from the 80th Training Command cheered each other on during a rousing spin session. Local agencies such as women’s shelters and domestic violence centers were also on-site to provide resources and information.

Miller said the Family Advocacy Program provides confidential support and appropriate referrals based on the unique needs of those that experience domestic violence. “Referrals may be in the form of medical and mental health care, emergency shelter, financial resources and more,” she said.

Francis Mitchell, family programs coordinator, U.S. Army Reserve 80th Training Command says the Family Programs provide education, confidential support and referral services to multiple agencies throughout the community. Mitchell said, “Our military community needs to know that Family Programs [Fort Family Outreach Support Center] is available 24/7/365 for all of our service members regardless of their geographic location at 1-844-ONE FAMY.”

Spin for the Cause sessions will be held from 11:30 a.m. – noon each Wednesday through the end of the month — Oct. 10, 17, and 24 — in the blue room of the Red Brick Fitness Center (Bldg. 33-D Bay). No reservation is required; however, space is limited so seats are first come, first served.

For more information on Spin for the Cause, visit the Aviation Announcements on DLA Today.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE>  5
<NAME> PHOENIX ASSOCIATES 
<CIK>  0000724332 
<MULTIPLIER>                               1
       
<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                      DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                        0
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            56,868
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         56,868
<PP&E>                                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        4,413,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 3,841,211
<BONDS>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                         (104,993,003)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          4,413,116
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              0
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            61,488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   12,350,322
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (12,411,810)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (12,411,810)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         100,182
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (12,311,628)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
23.1

Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have issued our report
dated March 23, 2010 with respect to the consolidated financial statements
included in the Annual Report of Image Sensing Systems, Inc. on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Image Sensing
Systems, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-162810, effective November 18, 2009;
File No. 333-41706, effective July 19, 2000) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-165303, effective March 8, 2010; File No.
333-152117, effective July 3, 2008; File No. 333-142449, effective April 30,
2007; File No. 333-82546, effective February 11, 2002; File No. 333-86169,
effective August 30, 1999; and File No. 333-09289, effective July 31, 1996).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota 
March 23, 2010

52

---
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-2734

___________

Terry Wayne Imbeau, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Mike Smith, Sheriff, Conway County; *

Jimmy Hart, County Judge, Conway *

County; Phil Blaylock, Jail *

Administrator, Conway County; Terry *

Alvey, Conway County Quorum Court *

Member; Louis Gottsponer, Conway *

County Quorum Court Member; Cody * Appeal from the United States

Hill, Conway County Quorum Court * District Court for the 

Member; Billy F. Deaver, Conway * Eastern District of Arkansas.

County Quorum Court Member; *

Michael Hammons, Conway County * [UNPUBLISHED]

Quorum Court Member; Philip Hoyt, *

Conway County Quorum Court *

Member; Gary Sams, Conway County *

Quorum Court Member; John Trafford, *

Conway County Quorum Court *

Member; Thomas Flowers; Lawrence *

Williams, Conway County Quorum *

Court Member; Lyle Wilson, Conway *

County Quorum Court Member, *

*

Appellees. *
 ___________

Submitted: April 18, 2012

Filed: April 25, 2012

___________

Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Terry Imbeau appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment

1

in his civil-rights action. Upon de novo review, see Holden v. Hirner, 663 F.3d 336,

340 (8th Cir. 2011), we agree that dismissal was proper for the reasons the district

court stated. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable H.

David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-