alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

_________________________________________ ) Application of ) ) ACT HAVAYOLLARI A. Ş . ) d/b/a ACT AIRLINES ) DOCKET OST-2012- ) for a Foreign Air Carrier Permit pursuant ) to 49 U.S.C. § 41301 and exemption ) authority pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109 ) (Turkey-U.S. charter, all-cargo service) ) _________________________________________ )

MOTION OF ACT HAVAYOLLARI A. Ş . D/B/A ACT AIRLINES FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

John R. Mietus, Jr. Law Office of John Mietus, LLC 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 300 Bethesda, MD 20817-7500 (202) 747-5212 - Telephone (240) 396-5362 - Fax john@mietuslaw.com Counsel for ACT HAVAYOLLARI A. Ş

. d/b/a ACT AIRLINES

April 3, 2012BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

_________________________________________ ) Application of ) ) ACT HAVAYOLLARI A. Ş . ) d/b/a ACT AIRLINES ) DOCKET OST-2012- ) for a Foreign Air Carrier Permit pursuant ) to 49 U.S.C. § 41301 and exemption ) authority pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109 ) (Turkey-U.S. charter, all-cargo service) ) _________________________________________ )

MOTION OF ACT HAVAYOLLARI A. Ş . D/B/A ACT AIRLINES FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

Pursuant to Rule 12 of the Department's Rules of Practice, 14 C.F.R.

§ 302.12, ACT Havayollar ı A. Ş . d/b/a ACT Airlines respectfully moves to

withhold from public disclosure the contents of Confidential Exhibit A (3

pages total). In accordance with Ru le 12, the exhibit has been marked

"Confidential" and is being filed under seal.

Confidential Exhibit A contains financial and operational information

relating to the applicant and projection s relating to the applicant’s proposed

service. The exhibit incorporates private, financial and commercial

information of a type that is not usua lly disclosed to the public, and it is

being provided to the Department so lely in support of the carrier's

application. Disclosure of this inform ation would cause material harm to the

applicant's competitive position.
#### Gary Lee ESTABROOK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. L-499.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Feb. 10, 1970.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender and Raymond L. Williams, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the final judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 168 (Friday, August 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45872-45873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23087]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Delta Region Preservation Commission; Notice of a Meeting

AGENCY: National Park Service, DOI.

ACTION: Meeting of the Delta Region Preservation Commission.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act that a meeting of the Delta Region Preservation 
Commission will be held at the following place and time.

DATES: Wednesday, August 27, 1997, at 7 p.m.


[[Page 45873]]


ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Student Union, University of 
New Orleans, Lakefront Campus, New Orleans, Louisiana.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Persons wishing further information concerning this meeting, or who 
wish to submit written statements, may contact Geraldine Smith, 
Superintendent, Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and Preserve, 365 
Canal Street, Suite 2400, New Orleans, Louisiana 70130-1136, telephone 
(504) 589-3882, extension 108.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Delta Region Preservation Commission was 
established pursuant to Section 907 of Pub. L. 95-625 (16 U.S.C. 230f), 
as amended, to advise the Secretary of the Interior in the selection of 
sites for inclusion in Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and 
Preserve, and in the implementation and development of a general 
management plan and of a comprehensive interpretive program of a 
natural, historic, and cultural resources of the region.
    The matters to be discussed at this meeting include:
    <bullet> Old Business
    <bullet> New Business
    <bullet> General Park Update
    The meeting will be open to the public. However, facilities and 
space for accommodating members of the public are limited, and persons 
will be accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. Any member of 
the public may file a written statement concerning matters to be 
discussed with the Superintendent, Jean Lafitte National Historical 
Park and Preserve.
    Minutes of the meeting will be available for public inspection 4 
weeks after the meeting at the headquarters office of Jean Lafitte 
National Historical Park and Preserve.

    Dated: August 7, 1997.
Daniel W. Brown,
Acting Regional Director, Southeast Region.
[FR Doc. 97-23087 Filed 8-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
EXHIBIT 13

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
                                      CODE)

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Progen Industries Limited, a company organized under the
laws of the State of Queensland, Australia (the "Company"), does hereby certify
to such officer's knowledge that:

     The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended June 30, 2005 (the "Form
20-F") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in
the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Progen Industries Limited and will be retained by Progen
Industries Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

Dated:   December 21, 2005              /s/ Lewis J. Lee
                                        ----------------
                                        Managing Director (Chief Executive
                                        Officer)

Dated:   December 21, 2005              /s/ Linton W. P. Burns
                                        ----------------------
                                        Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DOLORES CANDELARIA ESTEBANMANUEL and JUAN ESTEBANMANUEL, 

Petitioners, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-73252 

Agency Nos. A206-462-884 

A206-462-885 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 23, 2017**

Before: LEAVY, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Dolores Candelaria Esteban-Manuel and Juan Esteban-Manuel, natives and 

citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ 

order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 3 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-73252 

motion to reopen removal proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction 

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to 

reopen. Sembiring v. Gonzales, 499 F.3d 981, 985 (9th Cir. 2007). We grant the 

petition for review and remand.

The agency abused its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen 

where it relied on conjecture in petitioner’s affidavit regarding the possible 

discarding of mail, and did not consider all of the evidence that petitioners offered 

to rebut the presumption of delivery. See id. at 986-88 (describing evidence 

relevant to overcome presumption of effective service by regular mail); Salta v. 

INS, 314 F.3d 1076, 1079 (9th Cir. 2002) (“delivery by regular mail does not raise 

the same ‘strong presumption’ [of delivery] as certified mail, and less should be 

required to rebut such a presumption.”). On remand, the BIA should consider as 

part of its notice analysis petitioners’ compliance with an Immigration and 

Customs Enforcement check-in order both before and after the in absentia removal 

order was entered. See Sembiring, 499 F.3d at 989 (lack of motive to avoid 

immigration proceedings is a factor to be considered).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
#### Vivian LARKINS, Appellant, v. Glonger CARTER, Appellee.

No. 77-261.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 31, 1978.

Rehearing Denied July 17, 1978.

Michael N. Gomes of Week & Stone, P. A., Pompano Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The record fails to support the ruling of the trial court. Accordingly, the final judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to enter judgment for the appellant.

REVERSED with instructions.

DOWNEY, C. J., ANSTEAD, J., and SIL-VERTOOTH, LYNN N., Associate Judge, concur.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB/A of Global
Wataire, Inc. for the quarter ending , I, Edmund J. Gorman, Chief Financial
Officer of Global Wataire, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending , fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ending , fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Global Wataire, Inc.




Dated:  1
July  2008




/s/  Edmund
J.
Gorman


Edmund J.
Gorman,


Chief
Financial Officer of


Global
Wataire, Inc.
Exhibit 32


                           NORTHGATE INNOVATIONS, INC.
                       CERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE OFFICERS

      (Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Northgate Innovations, Inc. (the "Company"), does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2003 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.

         [A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.]


March ____, 2004

/s/ KENT A. SAVAGE
--------------------------------------------
Kent A. Savage
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ THEODORE B. MUFTIC
--------------------------------------------
Theodore B. Muftic
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


         The forgoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form
10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
White ~PTExA~ Arm-rnru

YI. .rExuAH

May 28, 1959

Commissioner of Agriculture Capitol Station Austin,Texas OpinionNo. W-634 Re: Whether Article 666 controls the purchase of office equipmentby the'Texas Department of Agriculturefrom the~Insurance LiquldaDear Mr. White: to??.

This office is In receipt of your recent letter in which you have stated in part, as follows:

"ThisDepartmenthas purchased fortyfour (44)pieices

of equipment from the InsuranceLiquidators, C.H. Langdeau, receiver for Franklin American Insurance Compan f$'the total amount of purchase being 131.25. Before purchasing, this was clearedwith the State Board of Control and proper purchase voucherswere approved and transmitted to the Comptroller Department from which theywere returned to us with a refusal of approval for payment. The argument in question is whether or not we are purchasing this equipment from the Insurance Commission or from the Franklin American Insurance Company." Article 666, Vernon's Civil Statutes,provides for the method of disposal (by sale or transfer to another State agency) of surplusor salvageproperty belonging to the State of Texas.

Article 21.28, Insurance Code, Vernon's Civil Statutes, establishingthe office of State Insurance Liquidator,prescribes themethod of appointment andHonorable John White, page 2 (W-634)

the duties and responsibilitiesof the office. The statute provides that he shal!be appointed the receiver of any insurance company domiciled in the State of Texas againstwhom delinquencyproceedingshave been brought.

The property In question Is personalproperty of the Franklin American Insurance Companywhich is in receivership. By order of the Court, the receiver obtains possession and title to the property as trustee for the benefit of the creditorsand stockholdersof the insurance company involved. Neither the Court, the Board of Insurance Commissioners,the Insurance Liquidatornor the State of'Texas acquires any proprietary interest in the property.

Therefore, it is the opinion of this office that Article 666 has no application to the purchase of the property in questionby the Department of Agriculture. SUMMARY Article 666 has no application to a purchase of propertyby the Texas Agriculture Commission from the State Insurance Liquldator. Very truly yours,

WILL WILSON Attorney General of Texas

JLE:rm APPROVED: OPINION OPINION COMMITTEE Geo. P. Blackburn, Chairman Elmer McVey Leonard Passmore Joe Allen Osborn REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEYGENERAL BY: W. V.Geppert
# Defense Logistics Agency, Fleet Readiness Center Southeast team up to tackle logistics

/ Published May 18, 2018
JACKSONVILLE, Fla,
UNITED
STATES


SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington,
D.C.  20549








FORM
8-K





CURRENT
REPORT





Pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities
Exchange Act of 1934








Date
      of Report (date of earliest event reported):
            December
      19, 2008





PROXIM
      WIRELESS CORPORATION(Exact
      name of registrant as specified in its
charter)








Delaware
            000-29053
            04-2751645(State
      or other jurisdiction of
              incorporation)
            (Commission
      file number)
            (IRS
      employer identification no.)








1561
      Buckeye Drive, Milpitas, CA
            95035(Address
      of principal executive offices)
            (Zip
      code)








Registrant’s
      telephone number, including area code:
            (408)
      383-7600








Not
      Applicable(Former
      name or former address, if changed since last
  report)








Check the
appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):




[  ]  Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
230.425)




[  ]  Soliciting
material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14a-12)




[  ]  Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))




[  ]  Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))







Item
8.01.  Other
Events.
 
 Proxim
Wireless Corporation has received notification from The NASDAQ Stock Market that
NASDAQ has extended, through April 20, 2009, the suspension of its rules
requiring a minimum $1.00 closing bid price and a minimum market value of
publicly held shares due to the continued extraordinary market
conditions.  NASDAQ stated that any company (such as Proxim) in the
compliance process for one of these concerns will continue to be “frozen” at the
same stage of the process until the end of the suspension.  However,
companies could be delisted for other reasons during the
suspension.


SIGNATURE





Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
duly authorized.





PROXIM
      WIRELESS CORPORATIONDated:
      December 23, 2008
            By:
            /s/ David
      L.
      RenauldDavid
      L. RenauldVice
      President







2
No. 00-7125.

#### Najarzadeh *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTechnology for Bayton-cycle powerplants using solar and nuclear energyBrayton cycle gas turbines have the potential to use either solar heat or nuclear reactors for generating from tens of kilowatts to tens of megawatts of power in space, all this from a single technology for the power generating system. Their development for solar energy dynamic power generation for the space station could be the first step in an evolution of such powerplants for a very wide range of applications. At the low power level of only 10 kWe, a power generating system has already demonstrated overall efficiency of 0.29 and operated 38 000 hr. Tests of improved components show that these components would raise that efficiency to 0.32, a value twice that demonstrated by any alternate concept. Because of this high efficiency, solar Brayton cycle power generators offer the potential to increase power per unit of solar collector area to levels exceeding four times that from photovoltaic powerplants using present technology for silicon solar cells. The technologies for solar mirrors and heat receivers are reviewed and assessed. This Brayton technology for solar powerplants is equally suitable for use with the nuclear reactors. The available long time creep data on the tantalum alloy ASTAR-811C show that such Brayton cycles can evolve to cycle peak temperatures of 1500 K (2240 F). And this same technology can be extended to generate 10 to 100 MW in space by exploiting existing technology for terrestrial gas turbines in the fields of both aircraft propulsion and stationary power generation.Document ID19860012106Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsEnglish, R. E.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1986Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-2558E-2761NAS 1.60:2558Accession Number86N21577Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860012106.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### FIRST MIAMI DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Cary B. Cook, Carol A. Cook, Joseph G. Reiff and Frances Reiff, Appellants, v. Margaret SCHREIBER, Appellee.

No. 77-352.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 15, 1977.

Edmonson S. Couric, Jr., Coral Gables, for appellants.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Weinsoff & Weinsoff, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings based on the appellee’s confession of error filed before this court.
# L_2023048DE.01010801.xml

| 16.2.2023 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 48/108 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2023

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 48/108

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2023/121 der Kommission vom 17. Januar 2023 zur Änderung und Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2021/1165 über die Zulassung bestimmter Erzeugnisse und Stoffe zur Verwendung in der ökologischen/biologischen Produktion und zur Erstellung entsprechender Verzeichnisse

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 16 vom 18. Januar 2023
  )

Seite 28, Anhang II, einleitender Satz:

Anstatt:

„In der Tabelle in Anhang II der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2021/1165 werden folgende Einträge gestrichen:“

muss es heißen:

„In der Tabelle in Anhang II der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2021/1165 werden folgende Einträge angefügt:“.

---
Dear Mr. Larry Todd Stephen s :

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA−2015

− 2840 )

. This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed

- set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non

- proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us to process your request any further, we must recei ve the information described above by 11/11/15 . I f we do not receive the
information

, we will close the dock et without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

- 4549

.

Sincerely,

/s/
Michael J. Cameron Program Analyst
#### SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant, v. GARY STEEL SUPPLY CO., Inc., a corporation, Appellee.

No. L-389.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Dec. 9, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.