alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 355 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1219 

[Report No. 109–213] 

To authorize certain tribes in the State of Montana to enter into a lease 

or other temporary conveyance of water rights to meet the water needs 

of the Dry Prairie Rural Water Association, Inc. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 9, 2005 

Mr. BURNS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2005 

Committee discharged; referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

JANUARY 24, 2006 

Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of January 18, 2006, by 

Mr. MCCAIN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To authorize certain tribes in the State of Montana to enter 

into a lease or other temporary conveyance of water 

rights to meet the water needs of the Dry Prairie Rural 

Water Association, Inc. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

S 1219 RS 

1 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE OF WATER RIGHTS 

2 TO DRY PRAIRIE RURAL WATER ASSOCIA3 TION, INC. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes 

5 of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana (referred 

6 to in this section as the ‘‘Tribes’’) may, with the approval 

7 of the Secretary, enter into a lease or other temporary con8 veyance of water rights recognized under the Fort Peck9 Montana Compact (Montana Code Annotated 85–20–201) 

10 with the Dry Prairie Rural Water Association, Incor11 porated (or any successor non-Federal entity) for the pur12 pose of meeting the water needs of that association, in 

13 accordance with section 5 of the Fort Peck Reservation 

14 Rural Water System Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–382; 

15 114 Stat. 1454). 

16 (b) CONDITIONS OF LEASE.—With respect to a lease 

17 or other temporary conveyance described in subsection 

18 (a)— 

19 (1) the term of the lease or conveyance shall 

20 not exceed 100 years; and 

21 (2)(A) the lease or conveyance may be approved 

22 by the Secretary without monetary compensation to 

23 the Tribes; and 

24 (B) the Secretary shall not be subject to liabil25 ity for any claim relating to any compensation or 
3 

S 1219 RS 

1 consideration received by the Tribes under the lease 

2 or conveyance. 

3 (c) NO PERMANENT ALIENATION OF WATER.—Noth4 ing in this section authorizes a permanent alienation of 

5 any water by the Tribes. 
Calendar No. 355 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1219 

[Report No. 109–213] 

A BILL 

To authorize certain tribes in the State of Montana 

the Dry Prairie Rural Water Association, Inc. ance of water rights to meet the water needs of to enter into a lease or other temporary conveyJANUARY 24, 2006 

Reported without amendment
#### Sandra MOBLEY v. BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF GADSDEN, INC., a corporation.

Civ. 1508.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

July 26, 1978.

Jack Floyd of Floyd, Keener & Cusimano, Gadsden, for appellant.

. Buford L. Copeland of Copeland & Copeland, Gadsden, for appellee.

HOLMES, Judge.

The Baptist Hospital of Gadsden sued the mother and father of a minor child. The hospital claimed the mother and father owed the hospital for services performed on behalf of the minor.

The circuit court, without a jury, found in favor of the hospital and entered a judgment against both the mother and father. The mother appeals from that judgment. The father makes no appeal.

As we perceive able counsel for the mother’s argument in brief, it is his contention that the law of Alabama provides that the primary responsibility for support of a minor child is the duty of the father and the mother has no duty to support. The mother therefore contends that the trial court could not, as a matter of law, enter a judgment against the mother. We disagree and affirm.

The record before this court reveals that the mother and father were divorced in 1971. The divorce decree in pertinent part provided that the primary custody of the minor child was to be with the mother. The father was to have custody on certain weekends during the month. The husband was required to provide each month a certain amount for child support. No specific provision was made with reference to medical expenses.

While the child was with the father on a weekend as provided in the decree of divorce, he broke his arm. The child was taken by the father to the plaintiff-hospital. Services were performed by the hospital. The father informed the hospital to bill the mother for the services performed. The amount of this bill was slightly in excess of $200.

*17Both the mother and father thereafter refused to pay the hospital’s bill. The hospital sued both the mother and father jointly-

The Etowah County Court entered judgment against the mother and father. The mother appealed to the circuit court. The circuit court entered a judgment against both the mother and father and, as indicated above, the mother has appealed to this court.

We would note at this point that both counsel for the mother and father have favored this court with concise and well written briefs. We would further note that the lawsuit was tried on an agreed statement of facts which provide little detail.

Suffice it to say that in this instance, as the issue is presented to us, we perceive no legal impediment in the trial court’s action of entering a judgment against both the mother and father. We believe *Thomason v. Thomason,*53 Ala.App. 206, 298 So.2d 627 (1974), authored by Presiding Judge Wright, clearly indicates that there is no law that prevents requiring child support or contributions thereto by the mother if she is shown to be capable of providing such support.

In view of the above, we cannot say that in this instance, we find reversible error by the trial court in entering a judgment against both the mother and the father. The case is due to be and is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

WRIGHT, P. J., and BRADLEY, J., concur.
Exhibit 32.1   EXHIBIT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2014, FORM
10-Q/A OF PCS EDVENTURES!.COM, INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of PCS Edventures!.com, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2014,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), I, Robert O. Grover,
Chief Executive Officer and of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Quarterly
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







|Date: | March 20, 2015 |  | By: | /s/Robert O. Grover                                          
|----- | -------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|      |                |  |     | Chief Executive Officer
        (principal executive officer)





A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 17 (Monday, January 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 3900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2097]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System, Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 62 FR 3513, 
January 23, 1997.

Previously Announced Time and Date of the Meeting: 11:00 a.m., Monday, 
January 27, 1997.

Changes in the Meeting: Addition of the following closed item(s) to the 
meeting: Guidance on international cooperation.

Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204.

    Dated: January 23, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-2097 Filed 1-23-97; 3:28 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
**EXHIBIT
      32**






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Alternate Energy Corp. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
                August 14, 2006
            By:*/s/
                Blaine Froats*
              **Name:
                Blaine FroatsTitle:
                Chief Executive OfficerDate:
                August 14, 2006
            By:*/s/
                Jack Wasserman*
              **Name:
                Jack WassermanTitle:
                Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer





20
Affirmed and Opinion Filed September 29, 2015 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01251-CR 

No. 05-14-01252-CR 

LAVANDRA DONTEKA RUSHING, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. F13-61091-W, F12-10110-W 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Myers 

Opinion by Justice Francis 

Lavandra Donteka Rushing appeals her convictions for abandoning a child with the 

intention to return and theft of property valued at $1,500 or more but less than $20,000. The trial 

court assessed punishment in each case at confinement for eighteen months in a state jail facility. 

On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeals are wholly 

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 

738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, 

there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. 

Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised 
‐2‐ 

appellant of her right to file a pro se response, but she did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. 

State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts 

and counsel in Anders cases). 

 We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 

826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree 

the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably 

support the appeals. 

 We affirm the trial court’s judgments. 

Do Not Publish 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47 

141251F.U05 

/Molly Francis/ 

MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE 
‐3‐ 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

LAVANDRA DONTEKA RUSHING, 

Appellant 

No. 05-14-01251-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District 

Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 

F13-61091-W). 

Opinion delivered by Justice Francis, 

Justices Bridges and Myers participating. 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is 

AFFIRMED. 

Judgment entered September 29, 2015. 
‐4‐ 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

LAVANDRA DONTEKA RUSHING, 

Appellant 

No. 05-14-01252-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District 

Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 

F12-10110-W). 

Opinion delivered by Justice Francis, 

Justices Bridges and Myers participating. 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is 

AFFIRMED. 

Judgment entered September 29, 2015.
No. 9059.

#### The Schuster Company *v.*Mabley.

(Decided March 20, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Mr. W. C. Pollner*and *Messrs. Beardsley £ Morgan,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Noble, Pinney £ Willard,*for defendant in *error.*

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lonnie COOLEY.

No. 60445.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 27, 1977.

*283Raymond L. Cannon, Asst. Indigent Defender, Tallulah, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., John T. Seale, Dist. Atty., Thomas W. Bishop, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBINES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofPhoenix Gold International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscalyear ended September 28, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Keith A. Peterson, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Keith A. Peterson   |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Keith A. Peterson       |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | December 19, 2003  |

 

1

----
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2

                       Consent Of Independent Accountants
                       ----------------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus 
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-44729 
and 333-48467) of Computer Learning Centers, Inc. of our report dated March 
13, 1998, except as to Note 16, which is as of April 27, 1998, appearing on 
page F-2 of this Form 10-K.

/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP



Price Waterhouse LLP
New York, New York
May 1, 1998
#### Robert G. FERSLEW and Phyliss Ferslew, Appellants, v. Anna RELAFORD, Appellee.

No. DD-365.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 25, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 18, 1977.

*369Brent W. Turbow and Arthur T. Boone, Jacksonville, for appellants.

Ellis E. Neder, Jr., Jacksonville, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the lower court’s order of remittitur, following the entry of a verdict in their favor for damages resulting from appellee’s refusal to renew their lease; appellee appeals the denial of her motion for directed verdict. As to appellant’s claim, having considered the record we determine no abuse of discretion has been shown. *E. g., Brewer v. Sun Ray Drug Company of Fla.,*105 So.2d 369 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1958); *Price v. Jordan,*115 So.2d 444 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1959).

As to appellee’s cross-appeal, we also find no reversible error. We will, however, address two points raised by appellee. She first urges the lower court erred in denying her motion for directed verdict on the ground appellants failed to show at the time they exercised their option to renew the lease they had not defaulted under any of the terms of the lease, alleging that appellants, had not shown they maintained insurance on the premises or paid any excess ad valorem taxes, as required by the lease. Nevertheless, appellee failed to complain of any of the alleged defaults within a reasonable time. “It is a well recognized principle in the law of contracts that the strict performance of the contract may be waived, . . . .” *Livingston v. Malever,*103 Fla. 200, 137 So. 113, 116 (1931).

Appellee additionally complains the trial court erred in denying her motion for directed verdict since appellants did not provide her with written notice of their intention to exercise their option to renew as required by Paragraph 17 of the lease. The record shows that such written notice would have been useless since appellee had already indicated she would not allow renewal. Where one party to an executory contract informs the other, before the time for consummation arrives, he will not perform his part of the contract, it is unnecessary for the other party to take further action. *Behrman v. Max,*102 Fla. 1094, 137 So. 120 (1931).

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Swanquarter National Wildlife Refuges

Bruce Freske

Refuge Manager

Mattamuskeet National Wildlife Refuge

38 Mattamuskeet Road

Swan Quarter, NC 27885

252-926-4021 (Phone)

252-926-1743 (Fax)

mattamuskeet@fws.gov

July 2008
EXHIBIT 32(b)



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 of Citizens Holding Company (the Company), as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Report), I, Robert T. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (3) | the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Robert T. Smith    
|                        |  | Robert T. Smith        
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Roger MILLER.

No. 62229.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 12, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writ of review. Parish of West Baton Rouge.

Writ denied. Insufficient showing to warrant the interruption of the orderly trial proceedings.

SUMMERS, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted. No showing has been made by the defense that the tapes contained contradictory statements. Such a foundation is essential to production of a witness’ statement in the State’s possession. *State v. Weston,*232 La. 766, 95 So.2d 305.
Page
Sixty Nine





Exhibit
32.2





Statement of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350




In
connection with the Annual Report of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, as the chief financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ R. Alan
      MillerDate:
      March 27, 2008
            R.
      Alan Miller, Chief Financial
Officer
#### Regalado PEREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-583.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 27, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
New command chaplain to focus on spiritual resiliency, religious-supply support to DoD
 
  By Beth Reece
    Defense Logistics Agency’s new command chaplain                         DLA’s religious-supply program
# DLA Deputy General Counsel visits DLA Distribution Korea

/ Published June 9, 2017
CAMP CARROLL, Korea, DLA Distribution Korea hosted the DLA deputy general counsel Melinda Davis-Perritano, Senior Executive Service, and James Diliberti, DLA general counsel on May 24. While on site, the visitors took the opportunity to provide annual ethics training to the workforce, but the presentation wasn’t the standard fare of normal training.
The training was organized similar to the game of Jeopardy.  Two sessions were provided, one for the OGE-450 filers, and then a second session for the remainder of the DLA Distribution Korea workforce. Each session lasted 90 minutes. Like Jeopardy, there were five categories for teams to choose from, and each category had five choices with values ranging from 100 - 500 points. Questions with lower point values were easier, and questions with higher point values were harder. In each session the groups were divided into two teams, and the teams took turns selecting a category and a point value. If the team answered the question correctly they received the associated point value. However, if the team missed the question, the points were subtracted from their score.

The real value of the game though, was that after a question had been selected, everyone in the room had the opportunity to hear the team debate the merits of the question while trying to determine the correct answer. Once an answer was given, Diliberti discussed the noteworthy aspects of the issue and why certain answers were the best ethical choice. Often Davis-Perritano weighed in and discussed the more salient, finer points of the issue, and succinctly emphasized why a particular answer was the best ethical choice. 

Round two of the game presented its own unique challenges for the hosts and the audience, as the vast majority of the team participants were DLA Distribution Korea’s local national population; so the content of the questions and answers had to be translated into 한국어 (Korean). Geon Hee Park, a college intern working in the safety office stepped up to the task and volunteered to take on translation duties. As questions appeared on the screen in English, Diliberti summarized the prominent points of the ethical dilemma and then Park would translate. Once an answer was selected, Diliberti would discuss the critical aspects of the correct response, and again, Park would translate where needed.

“I think the training was a great success,” said Dr. Dave Harris, deputy commander, DLA Distribution Korea. “Normally our workforce takes this annual training via the Learning Management System, sitting in front of a computer. To have Ms. Davis-Perritano and Mr. Diliberti come out and teach the subject in such a fun manner, and to have Ms. Park translate for our Korean Nationals was a wonderful respite from the normal LMS slide shows. Additionally, having two senior experts in ethical decision making lead the training provided valuable insights that our employees never receive via LMS.“