# Form A

**COMPA NY/FA** 

**CILITY INFORMA**

**TION** Legal Parent Company / Legal Corporate Name Guardian Fiberglass Inc. **Facility** Name Wi nnsboro **Facility** Address Street 1 Guardian Way City Wi nnsboro State South Carolina Zip Code 29180

**Technical Contact** Name Grover Thomas Technical Contact Title Env. Manager Telephone 517-630-2700 Email 

# groverthomas@bp.guardian.com
**General Facility**

**Information**
Is the facility currently a major source of HAP? Yes If No, did the facility take a limit of its potential HAP emissions to avoid classification as a major source: NA If Yes, does the facility anticipate becoming an area source in the future due to any changes in process operations (i.e., eliminating the use of HAP binders): Yes Estimated date facility will no longer be a major source (mo/yr). 6/30/2013
If applicable, explain the reason that the facility will no longer be a major source in the future. This facility is planning the phase out of HAP binders which will result in the facility becoming an area source.

**Binder Use Data**
Does the facility currently use phenol-formaldehyde binders? YesIf yes, how many lines currently use phenolformaldehyde binders? 1 Does the facility plan on phasing out the use of phenol-formaldehyde binders completely? Yes If yes, what is the anticipated date of the complete phase out? 6/30/2013 Wi ll this phase out change the facility status from a Major source to an Area source? Yes



# Wool Fiberglass 2011 ICR**Form B**

**FURNACE INFORMATION**

1

**Fill out the following information for EACH** **furnace at your facility (list each furnace individually):**

Furnace Unit ID Furnace Type Does this furnace share a stack or control device with other units? If Yes, List the Unit

IDs that share a stack with this furnace Original Date of

Construction Completed (mo/yr) Most Recent Rebuild (mo/yr) Estimated

future rebuild (mo/yr) Max Operating

Furnace Temperature (F) Average

Temperature of Molten Glass Exiting Furnace (F) Average Mass

of Molten Glass Exiting the Furnace (lbs/hr) Average

Volume of Molten Glass Exiting the Furnace (ft3/hr) Average Pull

Rate (tons/hr) Total Interior

Surface Area of Furnace below Glass Melt Line (ft2)* Total Interior

Surface Area of Furnace above Glass Melt Line (ft2)* Glass Contact

Floor Breast W all -

below Glass Melt Line Breast W all - at

and above Glass Melt Line Side W all -

below Glass Melt Line Side W all - at

and above Glass Melt Line Back W all -

below Glass Melt Line Back W all -at

and above Glass Melt Line Crown Port Neck Throat

ES-1 Cold Top Electric Steel Shell No 03/2007 NA 03/2015 2900 to 3100 2350 to 2550 5,200 32.3 2.6 339 4.7 30% NA NA 91% 91% NA NA NA NA 83-95%

Furnace Unit ID Type of

Control Device Pollutants

Controlled Date of Original

Installation Date of Next Major

Maintenance Event (mo/yr) Type of

Control Device Pollutants

Controlled Date of

Original Installation Date of Next

Major Maintenance Event (mo/yr) Type of Control

Device Pollutants

Controlled Date of Original

Installation Date of Next

Major Maintenance Event (mo/yr) 0 ES-1 Baghouse PM Mar-07 None Planned 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* If there are special design characteristics to be considered, please submit drawings or schematics to indicate how surface area calculations were made. Control Device 1 Control Device 2 Control Device 3 **For each furnace you must attach a purchase order or similar documentation that verifies the chrome percentages of the refractory materials listed below.**

**Percentage of Chromite/Chromium Oxide** List the TOTAL number of glass-meltingfurnaces at your facility (include any furnaces not currently operating). Do not group furnaces that share a stack and/or control device together. Do not include pot and marble units, specialty, or glass marble melting



### Wool Fiberglass 2011 ICR

### EMISSION TEST DATA RESULTS

Furnace Unit ID Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Pull Rate of Furnace During Test Runs (ton of glass pulled / hour) Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Pull Rate of Furnace During Test Runs (ton of glass pulled / hour) Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Pull Rate of Furnace During Test Runs (ton of glass pulled / hour) Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Pull Rate of Furnace During Test Runs (ton of glass pulled/hour)
0 ES-1 0.0011 0.0210 0.0086 2.3 Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined 

### 0.00008500 0.00002500 0.00000980 2.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Furnace Unit ID Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Pull Rate of Furnace During Test Runs (ton of glass pulled / hour) Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Pull Rate of Furnace During Test Runs (ton of glass pulled / hour)
0 ES-1 Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined 

### 0.00000390 0.00000180 0.00000170 2.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Method 29 Total Chromium Results **(lb/ton)**

Method 0061 Hexavalent Results **(lb/ton)** Method 29 Filterable PM Results **(lb/ton)**

Method 0061 Total Chrome Results**(lb/ton)** Method 29 Filterable Chromium Results **(lb/ton)** Method 29 Vaporous Chromium Results **(lb/ton)**



### Wool Fiberglass 2011 ICR