alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY v. BLUE STREAK ENTERPRISES, INC. and Continental Insurance Company.

No. 8625.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Dec. 13, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 11, 1978.

Hammett, Leake, Hammett, Hulse & Nelson, Eldon T. Harvey, III, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

Terriberry, Carroll, Yancey & Farrell, G. Edward Merritt, New Orleans, for defendants-appellees.

Before GULOTTA, STOULIG and DU-PLANTIER, JJ.

DUPLANTIER, Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s decision that a boat owner (or his subrogee) who pays a monthly fee for use of a boat slip in a marina cannot recover for the loss by theft of his boat moored in the slip, in the absence of proof of negligence on the part of the marina operator.

As did the trial judge, we reject appellant’s contention that a depositary relationship existed between the marina operator and the boat owner; they were merely lessor and lessee.1 The boat owner paid a monthly fee for the privilege of mooring one or more boats in the space in the marina and for using electricity and water. He could remove his boat or boats as he wished and secure it or them as he wished. The boat was never delivered to the marina operator, an element essential for deposit. (Art. 2930, Civil Code).

The judgment of the district court dismissing plaintiff’s suit at its cost is therefore affirmed.

*AFFIRMED.*

1

. See *Richardson v. Port Vincent Boat Works, Inc.,*284 F.Supp. 353 (E.D.La.).
EXHIBIT 32(b)

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 of Citizens Holding Company (the Company),
as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), I, Robert T. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (3) | the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 8, 2007 |  | /s/ Robert T. Smith    
|                       |  | Robert T. Smith        
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer
Case 4:04-cv-01189-MM Document 116 Filed 04/21/06 Page 1 of 18
Case 4:04-cv-01189-MM Document 116 Filed 04/21/06 Page 2 of 18
Case 4:04-cv-01189-MM Document 116 Filed 04/21/06 Page 3 of 18
Case 4:04-cv-01189-MM Document 116 Filed 04/21/06 Page 4 of 18
Case 4:04-cv-01189-MM Document 116 Filed 04/21/06 Page 5 of 18
Case 4:04-cv-01189-MM Document 116 Filed 04/21/06 Page 6 of 18
Case 4:04-cv-01189-MM Document 116 Filed 04/21/06 Page 7 of 18
Case 4:04-cv-01189-MM Document 116 Filed 04/21/06 Page 8 of 18
Case 4:04-cv-01189-MM Document 116 Filed 04/21/06 Page 9 of 18
Case 4:04-cv-01189-MM Document 116 Filed 04/21/06 Page 10 of 18
Case 4:04-cv-01189-MM Document 116 Filed 04/21/06 Page 11 of 18
Case 4:04-cv-01189-MM Document 116 Filed 04/21/06 Page 12 of 18
Case 4:04-cv-01189-MM Document 116 Filed 04/21/06 Page 13 of 18
Case 4:04-cv-01189-MM Document 116 Filed 04/21/06 Page 14 of 18
Case 4:04-cv-01189-MM Document 116 Filed 04/21/06 Page 15 of 18
Case 4:04-cv-01189-MM Document 116 Filed 04/21/06 Page 16 of 18
Case 4:04-cv-01189-MM Document 116 Filed 04/21/06 Page 17 of 18
Case 4:04-cv-01189-MM Document 116 Filed 04/21/06 Page 18 of 18
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Spectrum Realty, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William J. Carden, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results of operations of the Company for the period indicated.





Dated:  May 16, 2011





/s/ William J. CardenWilliam J. CardenPresident and Chief Executive Officer
January 15, 2014

Mr. Greg Paxson

Director of Maintenance

TWC Aviation

16700C Roscoe Blvd

Van Nuys, CA 91406

Dear: Mr. Paxson

This letter is to inform you that we have received and begun processing your petition for

exemption. It acknowledges receipt o f the petition and describes how we will process it.

We Have the Petition

We have received your Novem ber 22 , 2013 petition on behalf of TWC Aviation Inc. (TWC )

for an exemption from § § 135.156 ( f ) (1 )(i ii) and 135.156 ( f

)( 2 ) (iii) of Title 14, Code of Federal

Regulations (14 CFR). This exemption, if granted, would a llow TWC to operate its Dassault

Falcon series aircraft beyond April 21, 2014, without meeting flight data recorder

requirements to capture flight parameters without filtering for accurate reconstr uction of

events during an investigation

We have added your petition to the p ublic docket No. FAA

- 2013

- 1047 and we are processing

it. We will contact you if we need additional information.

How We Will Process the Petition

A petition for an exemption, ac cording to § 11.63(d), must be sent to the FAA at least

120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. In addition, we publish a

summary of the petition in the Federal Register for public com ment unless, according to

§ 11.87, we determine t hat good cause exists for not publishing it.2

We will advise you of the agency's final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you

have any questions in the meantime , you may contact me at (202) 493

- 5260

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Alphonso W. P e ndergra ss

Transportation Industry Analyst

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division3

Project No.: AFS

- 14

- 073

- E

Project Officer: _______________

ARM

- 207:A Pendergrass: 01/14/14:Doc#37724

ARM

- 200:Program Office AFS

- 300

MR GREG PAXSON

DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE

TWC AVIATION INC

16700C ROSCOE BLVD

VAN NUYS CA 91406
**Crop Values (ZCV-BB)
A product of the National Agricultural Statistics Service, Agricultural Statistics Board, U.S. Department of Agriculture**Description:**
**
Exhibit


Exhibit 10.131


 FIRST AMENDMENT TO SUBLEASE AGREEMENT


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO SUBLEASE AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the 23rd day of September, 2015, (the “Execution Date”) but effective upon the Effective Date (as hereinafter defined), by and between ADK GEORGIA, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (“Sublessor”) and 3223 FALLIGANT AVENUE ASSOCIATES, L.P., a Georgia limited Partnership (“Sublessee”).  


W I T N E S S E T H:


WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain lease dated August 1, 2010, as amended (the “Master Lease”), Sublessor leased from William F. Foster (“Landlord”) the premises described in the Master Lease; 


WHEREAS, Sublessor and Sublessee have entered into that certain Sublease Agreement dated January 31, 2015 for that certain skilled nursing facility located at 3223 Falligant Avenue, Thunderbolt, Georgia 31404 (the “Sublease”); and


WHEREAS, Sublessor and Sublessee desire to amend the Sublease as hereinafter set forth.
    
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, paid by each party to the other, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and the mutual covenants and benefits flowing between the parties, Sublessor and Sublessee, intending to be legally bound, do hereby covenant and agree as follows:


1.Capitalized Terms.  Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized words and phrases used herein shall have the same meanings ascribed to them in the Sublease.


2.Effective Date.  This Amendment shall become effective upon Landlord’s written approval (such date is referred to herein as the “Effective Date”).  Following the execution and delivery of this Amendment, Sublessor shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain the written consent of Landlord to the parties entering into this Amendment, in form and substance reasonably acceptable to Sublessee.


3.Term.  Section 2 of the Sublease is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence thereof in its entirety and by substituting the following in lieu thereof: 


2.    Terms and Conditions.  The term of this Sublease shall commence on March 1, 2015 and continue until midnight August 31, 2027 unless sooner terminated as hereinafter provided. 


4.Agreement in Effect.  Except as herein specifically provided, all other terms and provisions of the Sublease shall remain in full force and effect, and are hereby ratified and reaffirmed by the parties.

HNZW//3583-1




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.




SUBLESSOR:




ADK GEORGIA, LLC,
a Georgia limited liability company 


 


By:    /s/ William McBride
Name:    William McBride
Title:    Manager






SUBLESSEE:




3223 FALLIGANT AVENUE ASSOCIATES, L.P., 
a Georgia limited partnership






By:       /s/ James J. Andrews
Name:  James J. Andrews 
Title:    President













HNZW//3583-1    2
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1726

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 324 Main Street in Grambling, Louisiana,

as the ‘‘Coach Eddie Robinson Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 1726 ES

1 SECTION 1. COACH EDDIE ROBINSON POST OFFICE BUILD2 ING.

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States

4 Postal Service located at 324 Main Street in Grambling,

5 Louisiana, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Coach

6 Eddie Robinson Post Office Building’’.

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Coach Eddie Robinson

11 Post Office Building’’.

Passed the Senate September 30 (legislative day,

September 29), 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1726

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. bling, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Coach Eddie Robinson al Service located at 324 Main Street in Gram-
No. 9330.

#### The Northern Ohio Traction Company *v.*Mitchell.

(Decided April 24, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Summit county.

*486*WFessrs. Rogers, Rowley, Bradley & Rockwell,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Billman & Billman*and *Mr. Orlando Wil<cox,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### Charles C. ROGERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-48.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Dec. 30, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 29, 1970.

Charles C. Rogers, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and record in this appeal having been read and given full consideration and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order appealed is hereby affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
- About ARC
              - Appalachian Region
              - Program Areas
              - Grants and Funding

Research, Maps, and Data
            - Research Reports               - Asset-Based Development
              - Business
              - Demographics
              - Distressed Counties
              - Education
              - Energy
              - Evaluations
              - Export and Trade Development
              - Foundations
              - Health Care
              - Infrastructure
              - Leadership Development and Capacity Building
              - Natural Resources
              - Socioeconomic Research
              - Telecommunications
              - Tools
              - Tourism Development
              - Transportation
            - Maps               - Economic Status
              - Education
              - Geography
              - Income
              - Population
              - Poverty
              - Unemployment
            - Data Reports
            - Economic Reports

              - Newsroom
              - Publications

|  |
|--|

HomeResearch, Maps, and DataMapsPopulationPopulation Density Rates in Appalachia, 2000

Print this pageEmail this page

## Population Density Rates in Appalachia, 2000

Population density is a measure of the dispersion of people, which is calculated by dividing the 2000 census population by the 2000 land area in square miles.

Print

PDF version of the map (980 KB)

Excel file of supporting data for the map (80KB)

Data Report

Source and Methodology

Site MapContact ARCPrivacy PolicyWeb PolicyUSA.govOffice of  Inspector General
#### Lex MIXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 75-923.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 13, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 18, 1977.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and James R. Bean III, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and C. Marie Bernard, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and DOWNEY and LETTS, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000942789
<NAME> VALRICO BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,787
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   509
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      7,295
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,839
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,858
<LOANS>                                         63,239
<ALLOWANCE>                                        778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,366
<DEPOSITS>                                      73,733
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,642
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                572
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,168
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           302
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,949
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  84,366
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,284
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  506
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   477
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,267
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,229
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,353
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,914
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      101
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,688
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    963
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         963
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       639
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.09
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.00
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    189
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   776
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      102
<RECOVERIES>                                         3
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  778
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               778
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### UNITED JAX RENTALS, INC., Thomas J. Capobianco, Bruce K. Lambert, Richard L. Levinger, Deborah K. Parnell, Rose J. Vines, and Steven Randall Wiggins, Petitioners, v. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 77-2495.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 10, 1978.

John S. Winnie of Winnie & Winnie, P.A., and Michael J. Wilhelm, Gainesville, for petitioners.

Howard Handley and Kenneth M. Meer of the Florida Real Estate Com’n, Orlando, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners have filed a Suggestion for Writ of Prohibition and Petition for Writ of Certiorari alleging the respondent exceeded its authority and departed from the essential requirements of law by issuing its Emergency Suspension Order suspending the broker’s and salesmen’s registrations of petitioners. Because the statute provides the suspension shall only be effective for a period of ninety days, and that period has now expired, we determine the petition and suggestion to be moot. Section 120.54(8)(c), Florida Statutes (1975).

Suggestion for Writ of Prohibition and Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and ANSTEAD and DAUKSCH, JJ„ concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00715-CV

Eue Jin Jeong and/or all other occupants, Appellant

v.

Texas Greenovation, LLC, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-14-008244, HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s opening brief was originally due on March 19, 2015. Afterthis deadline

passed without a brief being filed, our Clerk sent notice to appellant on March 25, 2015, warning that

his brief was overdue and that the appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution if appellant did

not respond with a reasonable explanation for the failure by April 6, 2015. To date, appellant has 1

provided no explanation of his ongoing failure to file a brief, let alone filed one. We dismiss the

appeal for want of prosecution.2

See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1) (if appellant fails to timely file a brief, this Court is 1

empowered to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant reasonably explains the

failure and appellee is not significantly injured by that failure).

 See id. R. 42.3(b). 2
__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: September 30, 2015

2
#### Victor H. HUTCHINS, Jr., Appellant, v. Mary C. HUTCHINS, Appellee.

No. 69-306.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 6, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
# New videos highlight DLA support to Norway’s Trident Juncture 

/ Published Jan. 10, 2019

The Defense Logistics Agency’s support to one of the largest military exercises ever conducted in Norway is the subject of four new videos highlighting DLA’s partnership with U.S. and NATO countries.

Trident Juncture 2018 took place October through November and involved 50,000 NATO participants, 250 aircraft, 65 ships and 10,000 vehicles. DLA provided food, fuel, repair parts, medical supplies and more to forward logistics units, as shown in “Logistics On Location: DLA Supporting Trident Juncture 18.”

In “Everywhere You Go... 22nd Naval Construction Regiment,” see how DLA builds a strong partnership and trust with U.S. Marines building a medium girder bridge. “Everywhere You Go... 2nd Marine Logistics Group Forward” illustrates how DLA provided world-class logistics in extreme cold weather. And in “Everywhere You Go... Hot Chow,” watch culinary specialists use fresh fruits and vegetables provided by DLA to cook a hot meal that builds morale even while troops train in snow, sleet and cold rain.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Gilbert SMALL and Johnelle McCullough.

No. 61305.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 28, 1978.

Milton P. Masinter, New Orleans, for Gilbert Small.

James Brodtmann, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for both defendants.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., John L. A. Lenfant, IV, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
US Oncology, Inc.



EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of US Oncology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R.
Dale Ross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                 |  |  |  |     |  |                                                           
|----- |  | --------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|      |  |                 |  | 
|      |  |                 |  | 
|Date: |  | March 12, 2004: |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    R. DALE ROSS                                       
|      |  |                 |  |  |  |     |  |                                                           
|      |  |                 |  |  |  |     |  | R. Dale Ross, Chief Executive Officer of US Oncology, Inc.
PUBLIC LAW 115–149—MAR. 23, 2018 132 STAT. 1233 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3369: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 163 (2017): Nov. 15, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 164 (2018): Mar. 7, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–149 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 225 North 

Main Street in Spring Lake, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Howard B. Pate, Jr. Post 

Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. HOWARD B. PATE, JR. POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 225 North Main Street in Spring Lake, North 

Carolina, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Howard B. Pate, 

Jr. Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Howard B. Pate, Jr. Post Office’’. 

Approved March 23, 2018. 

Mar. 23, 2018 

[H.R. 3369] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS