alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2355]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[MT-020-1020-00]


Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Montana, Miles City District, 
Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Miles City District Resource Advisory Council will have a 
meeting Wednesday, February 26, 1997 at 10:00 a.m. Department of 
Agriculture Building conference room, 409 East Spring, Terry, Montana.
    Topics of discussion at the meeting will be a review of the off-
highway vehicle/block management plan document, the PILT (payment-in-
lieu-of-taxes) program, and an update on the land exchange program. The 
meeting is expected to last until 4:00 p.m.
    The meeting is open to the public and the public comment period is 
set for 1:00 p.m. The public may make oral statements before the 
Council or file written statements for the Council to consider. 
Depending on the number of persons wishing to make an oral statement, a 
per person time limit may be established. Summary minutes of the 
meeting will be available for public inspection and copying during 
regular business hours.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marilyn Krause, Public Affairs 
Specialist, Miles City District, 111 Garryowen Road, Miles City, 
Montana 59301, telephone (406) 232-4331.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the Council is to advise the 
Secretary of the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of planning 
and management issues associated with public land management. The 15 
member Council includes individuals who have expertise, education, 
training or practical experience in the planning and management of 
public lands and their resources and who have a knowledge of the 
geographical jurisdiction of the Council.

    Dated: January 24, 1997.
Todd Christensen,
Acting District Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-2355 Filed 1-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
Exhibit 32.1


  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Big Sky Industries I,
Inc. (the  "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Ramon
Chimelis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


    Date: August 22, 2007                           /s/Ramon Chimelis
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Ramon Chimelis
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of and for the period covered by theReport. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:       August      14, 2008 | /s/      Kevin M. McCarthy                             |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                | Kevin      M. McCarthy                                 |
|                                                                | President      and Chief Executive Officer             |
|                                                                |                                                   |
|                                                                |                                                   |
|                                                                |                                                   |
| Date:       August      14, 2008 | /s/      Bruce A. Walsh                                |
|                                                                | Bruce      A. Walsh                                    |
|                                                                | Senior      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                                                |                                                   |
EX-99.2 Certification Pursuant to Section 906

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Certification of chief FINANCIAL officer

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of  International  Surfacing,  Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"),  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June
30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Andrew Abouyon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Andrew Abouyon
------------------
Andrew Abouyon Chief Financial Officer
September 9, 2003
#### Raymond LONG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-86.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 27, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 18, 1970.

*34Jack J. Taffer and Paul Pollack, Miami, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Melvin Grossman, Asst. Atty. Gen. for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.

HENDRY, Judge.

The appellant was adjudicated guilty of the crime of robbery. Appellant contends that the trial judge erred in denying his motion to suppress a certain oral statement made by the appellant while under police interrogation. This motion was predicated upon the appellant’s contention that no proper waiver of his constitutional rights occurred before the incriminating statement was elicited. The mandate from the United States Supreme Court, as outlined in the landmark case of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966) stated as follows:

> “If the interrogation of an individual held by police contrives without the presence of an attorney, and a statement is taken, a heavy burden rests on the government to demonstrate that the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his privilege against self-incrimination and his right to retained or appointed counsel.”

In the instant case, the interrogation did, in fact, take place outside the presence of the appellant’s attorney. Moreover, in arguing that he did not validly waive his constitutional rights, the appellant points out the following facts which are demonstrated by the record: (a) although one police officer testified that he overheard another officer advise the appellant of his Miranda rights, the actual officer who allegedly so advised the appellant did not take the stand; (b) the testifying officer stated that the Miranda rights were read to the appellant from a “Miranda card”, but the actual card itself was not produced in court nor was it read into the record. Without proper evidence in the record as to the contents of the alleged warnings read or given to the appellant we are compelled to hold that the above-cited requirement set forth in Miranda, supra, was not met. Cf. Woods v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 211 So.2d 248, 249.

Therefore, the judgment and sentence being appealed is reversed and the appellant is to be granted a new trial pursuant to § 924.36 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. (1967).
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNatural laminar flow flight experiments on a swept wing business jet-boundary layer stability analysesThe linear boundary layer stability analyses and their correlation with data of 18 cases from a natural laminar flow (NLF) flight test program using a Cessna Citation 3 business jet are described. The transition point varied from 5% to 35% chord for these conditions, and both upper and lower wing surfaces were included. Altitude varied from 10,000 to 43,000 ft and Mach number from 0.3 to 0.8. Four cases were at nonzero sideslip. Although there was much scatter in the results, the analyses of boundary layer stability at the 18 conditions led to the conclusion that crossflow instability was the primary cause of transition. However, the sideslip cases did show some interaction of crossflow and Tollmien-Schlichting disturbances. The lower surface showed much lower Tollmien-Schlichting amplification at transition than the upper surface, but similar crossflow amplifications. No relationship between Mach number and disturbance amplification at transition could be found. The quality of these results is open to question from questionable wing surface quality, inadequate density of transition sensors on the wing upper surface, and an unresolved pressure shift in the wing pressure data. The results of this study show the need for careful preparation for transition experiments. Preparation should include flow analyses of the test surface, boundary layer disturbance amplification analyses, and assurance of adequate surface quality in the test area. The placement of necessary instruments and usefulness of the resulting data could largely be determined during the pretest phase.Document ID19860015188Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsRozendaal, R. A.*(Boeing Commercial Airplane Co. Seattle, WA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1986Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-3975NAS 1.26:3975D6-53071Accession Number86N24659Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-61-41-02CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-401Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860015188.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# L_2023070EN.01005601.xml

| 8.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 70/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 70/56

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/421 of 24 February 2023 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 61 of 27 February 2023
  )

On page 43, in the Annex, in the introductory wording:

for:

‘Annex I to Decision 2012/642/CFSP is amended as follows:

| (1) | in Table A. ‘Natural persons referred to in Articles 3(1) and 4(1)’, entries 10, 17, 20, 22, 35, 39, 41, 42, 64, 65, 71, 73, 75, 78, 85, 87, 89, 90, 123, 125 and 179 are replaced by the following:’, |
| --- | --- |

(1)

in Table A. ‘Natural persons referred to in Articles 3(1) and 4(1)’, entries 10, 17, 20, 22, 35, 39, 41, 42, 64, 65, 71, 73, 75, 78, 85, 87, 89, 90, 123, 125 and 179 are replaced by the following:’,

read:

‘Annex I to Decision 2012/642/CFSP is amended as follows:

| (1) | in Table ‘A. Natural persons referred to in Articles 3(1) and 4(1)’, entries 10, 17, 20, 22, 35, 39, 41, 42, 64, 65, 71, 73, 75, 78, 85, 87, 89, 90, 104, 123, 125, 129, 131, 179 and 195 are replaced by the following:’. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

in Table ‘A. Natural persons referred to in Articles 3(1) and 4(1)’, entries 10, 17, 20, 22, 35, 39, 41, 42, 64, 65, 71, 73, 75, 78, 85, 87, 89, 90, 104, 123, 125, 129, 131, 179 and 195 are replaced by the following:’.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,429
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,183
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,743
<PP&E>                                          25,144
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,201
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 339,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,771
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           284
<OTHER-SE>                                     221,570
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   339,400
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               205,460
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  173,493
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,307
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,722
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,072
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,650
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,650
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.1


Summary of New Jersey Resources Corporation Non-Employee Director Compensation 
	
							
	  
	  
	  
	  
	  

	Annual Cash Retainer Fee (All independent directors except Lead Director):
	  
	$68,000
	 
	  

	Lead Director Additional Annual Cash Retainer
	  
	$18,750
	 
	  

	 
	 
	 

	Annual Equity Retainer (in common stock equivalent)†
	$90,000
	

	 

	

Annual Retainer - Committee Member:
	 
	 
	 

	Audit 
	 
	$12,000
	 
	 

	Leadership Development and Compensation Committee
	 
	$6,000
	 
	 

	Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee
	 
	$6,000
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Additional Annual Retainer for Committee Chairs:
	 
	 
	 

	Audit 
	 
	$15,000 
	 
	  

	Executive
	 
	$15,000 
	 
	  

	Leadership Development and Compensation 
	 
	$15,000 
	 
	  

	Nominating/Corporate Governance
	 
	$15,000 
	 
	  

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Subsidiary Board Retainers:*
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Annual Retainer- Subsidiary Board Member**                          
	 
	 
	$
	9,000
	

	 

	Additional Annual Retainer- Subsidiary Board Lead Director***    
	$
	15,000
	

	 




In the event of extraordinary circumstances resulting in an excessive number of Board or Committee meetings beyond the typical number of meetings of a Board or Committee in a given year, the Board retains discretion to pay an additional per meeting fee of $1,500 to each attending non-employee director that is a member of such Board or Committee.
† The number of shares to be based upon the closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant.
* Subsidiary Boards include the Boards of Directors for New Jersey Natural Gas, NJR Energy Services, NJR Clean Energy Ventures, NJR Clean Energy Ventures II and NJR Energy Investments.  
**Subsidiary Board Member Annual Retainers and any additional meeting fees are based upon each member only being compensated for one meeting when joint Boards of Directors meetings occur.
***Lead Directors of more than one subsidiary Board will only be paid a single annual retainer fee of $15,000 for service as Lead Director on those Boards.
**Exhibit 32.1***

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. § 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of NeoPharm, Inc.,a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to theAnnual Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “10-K/A Report”)that:

 

(1)  the 10-K/A Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  the information contained in the 10-K/A Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                        | /s/  RONALD G. EIDELL     |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------|
|                        | Ronald  G. Eidell,        |
| Dated:  April 29, 2005 | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----

*This certification shall not bedeemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actof 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 21, 2011 

jam 

Order 

 

June 21, 2011 

143261 (29) 

NELSON SUMPTER, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 143261 

 COA: 301689 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

 Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $120.00, shall submit a copy of this 

order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being 

returned with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not 

being filed in this Court. 

 If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$255.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. 

 Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

 The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
Exhibit 99.12

CERTIFICATION

REQUIRED
BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

Agrium Inc. (the Company) is filing its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the
Report) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

I, Stephen G. Dyer, Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                     |  |                                                   
|-------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 4, 2014 |  |                     |  |                                                   
|                     | 
|                     |  | /S/ Stephen G. Dyer
|                     |  | Name:               |  | Stephen G. Dyer                                   
|                     |  | Title:              |  | Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I,
the undersigned officer of the Bouldin Corporation
(formerly License Acquisition Corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2006 of the Company fully complies,
in all material respects, with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and the information contained in the Report
fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ Floyd E. Bouldin
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer

Date: November 14, 2006
**Livestock Slaughter (PLS-BB)
A product of the National Agricultural Statistics Service, Agricultural Statistics Board, U.S. Department of Agriculture**Description:**
**