alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
                                      CODE)

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Progen Industries Limited, a company organized under the
laws of the State of Queensland, Australia (the "Company"), does hereby certify
to such officer's knowledge that:

     The Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended June 30, 2004 (the
"Form 20-F/A") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Form 20-F/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Progen Industries Limited and will be retained by Progen
Industries Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


Dated:   April 14, 2005                   /s/ Lewis J. Lee
                                          ----------------
                                          Managing Director (Chief Executive
                                          Officer)


Dated:   April 14, 2005                   /s/ Linton W. P. Burns
                                          ----------------------
                                          Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
# L_2008219EN.01006301.xml

| 14.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 219/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 219/63

---

DECISION OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES

of 23 July 2008

appointing a judge to the Court of First Instance of the European Communities

(2008/668/EC, Euratom)

THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 224 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 140 thereof,

Whereas:

Pursuant to Articles 5 and 7, in conjunction with Article 47, of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice and following the resignation of Mr John D. Cooke, a judge should be appointed to the Court of First Instance of the European Communities for the remainder of the term of office of Mr John D. Cooke, which runs until 31 August 2013,

HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Kevin O’Higgins is hereby appointed judge to the Court of First Instance of the European Communities for the period from 1 September 2008 to 31 August 2013.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 23 July 2008.

The President

P. SELLAL

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1517 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1517

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To permit Women's Business Centers to re-compete for sustainability 
                                grants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WOMEN'S BUSINESS CENTERS.

    Section 29(k) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656(k)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) Prior recipients.--Notwithstanding subsection (l)(1), 
        any recipient of a grant under subsection (l) whose 5-year 
        project ended in fiscal year 2004, is eligible to apply to 
        receive the funds for grants to continue Women's Business 
        Centers in sustainability status for fiscal year 2005, made 
        available by Public Law 108-447 (118 Stat. 2911).''.

            Passed the Senate July 27, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1517

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To permit Women's Business Centers to re-compete for sustainability 
                                grants.
```
#### Jack BESONER et al., Plaintiffs, v. Grady CRAWFORD, Chief Judge, etc., Defendant.

No. 51865.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 31, 1978.

Bruce W. Greer of Arky, Freed, Stearns, Watson & Greer, Miami, for plaintiffs.

Stuart Simon, Dade County Atty. and Murray A. Greenberg, Asst. County Atty., Miami, for defendant.

*415Duane Anderson of Sams, Anderson & Ward, Miami, for Bert Friedman, B. A. Roland, Marty LeShaw and Joseph Troiano, intervenors.

PER CURIAM.

' This ease was filed with the court as an application for constitutional or other necessary writ pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 4.5(g) which provides:

“g. Constitutional writs.

> (1) *In Aid of Prescribed Jurisdiction.*Application for constitutional or other writs necessary to the complete exercise of the jurisdiction of the Court will be entertained only after reasonable notice to the adverse party. No such petition will be entertained unless the case is one in which the Court may properly acquire jurisdiction and then only when it is made clearly to appear that the writ is in fact necessary in aid of an ultimate power of review and that a supersedeas order entered by the lower court will not completely preserve the Court’s jurisdiction, or that the lower court has erroneously refused to enter such an order.”

This application is not sought to protect existing jurisdiction of the court. The application seeks to use the constitutional all writs power of the court as an independent basis for jurisdiction.

The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court has administrative powers over all courts within the state pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.020(b)(2) which provides in part:

> The chief judge shall exercise administrative supervision over all courts within the judicial circuit in the exercise of judicial powers and over the judges and officers of the courts, *and shall be responsible to the chief justice of the supreme court.*(emphasis added)

Accordingly, this application for constitutional writ is dismissed. The Chief Justice, in the exercise of supervisory power, will communicate with these parties and will take appropriate action with advice of the court.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and BOYD, HATCH-ETT and KARL, JJ., concur.

ADKINS, J., dissents.
#### Clifford H. WILMATH, Appellant, v. John J. KEHOE, Appellee.

No. 69-248.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 7, 1969.

Claude Pepper, Miami Beach, and Albert E. Harum, Miami, for appellant.

Fowler, White, Collins, Gillen, Humkey & Trenam, and Henry Burnett, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and BARK-DULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See McDaniel v. Harrell, 81 Fla. 66, 87 So. 631, 13 A.L.R. 1333 (1921), and other cases cited at 30A Am.Jur. Judges § 78, page 50, footnote 12.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT FOUND IN PAGE 3 OF THIS PARTNERSHIP'S
FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,313
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,313
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 251,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              315
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     251,644
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   251,959
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,877
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,877
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.95


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1413 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1413

 To redesignate the Crowne Plaza in Kingston, Jamaica as the Colin L. 
                       Powell Residential Plaza.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 15, 2005

 Mr. Lugar (for himself and Mr. Biden) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To redesignate the Crowne Plaza in Kingston, Jamaica as the Colin L. 
                       Powell Residential Plaza.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF COLIN L. POWELL RESIDENTIAL PLAZA.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building in Kingston, Jamaica, 
formerly known as the Crowne Plaza and now a staff housing facility for 
the United States mission in Jamaica, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Colin L. Powell Residential Plaza''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
Colin L. Powell Residential Plaza.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23


<PAGE>
                     [Letterhead of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP]



                   Consent of Independent Public Accountants



The Board of Directors 
Redwood Financial, Inc.:



We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement  (No.
333-4204) on Form S-8 of Redwood  Financial,  Inc. of our report dated August 8,
1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Redwood Financial, Inc. and
subsidiary as of June 30, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated statements
of  earnings,  stockholders'  equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended June 30, 1997, which report appears in the June 30, 1997
annual report on Form 10-KSB of Redwood Financial, Inc.





                                          /s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                        



September 26, 1997
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 165 (Tuesday, August 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22837]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

DATES: Weeks of August 25, September 1, 8, and 15, 1997.

PLACE: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Public and closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED

Week of August 25

    There are no meetings scheduled for the week of August 25.

Week of September 1--Tentative

Wednesday, September 3

11:30 a.m. Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (if needed)

Week of September 8--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the week of September 8.

Week of September 15--Tentative

Wednesday, September 17

9:00 a.m. Briefing by DOE on Strategy for MOX Fuel Fabrication and 
Irradiation Services (Public Meeting)
    (Contact: Ted Sherr, 301-415-7218)
10:30 a.m. Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (if needed)

Friday, September 19

10:00 a.m. Briefing on Improvements in Senior Management Assessment 
Process for Operating Reactors (Public Meeting)
    (Contact: Bill Borchardt. 301-415-1257)
1:30 p.m. Briefing by DOE and NRC on Regulatory Oversight of DOE 
Nuclear Facilities (Public Meeting)
Please note: Affirmation of ``Louisiana Energy Services (Claiborne 
Enrichment Center); Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Partial Initial 
Decision (Resolving Contentions B and J.3), LBP-973'' was postponed 
from Friday, August 22. No new date has been set.

    The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on short 
notice. To verify the status of meetings call (Recording)--(301) 415-
1292.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Bill Hill (301) 415-1661.
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at:
http://www.nrc.gov/SECY/smj/schedule.htm

    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to it, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary. Attn: Operations Branch, 
Washington, D.C. 20555 (301-415-1661).
    In addition, distribution of this meeting notice over the internet 
system is available. If you are interested in receiving this Commission 
meeting schedule electronically, please send an electronic message to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a2d5cfcae2ccd0c18cc5cdd4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9becf6f3dbf5e9f8b5fcf4ed">[email protected]</span></a> or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0b6f607c4b657968256c647d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5c38372b1c322e3f723b332a">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 22, 1997.
William H. Hill, Jr.,
Secy Tracking Officer, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22837 Filed 8-22-97; 2:20 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Saitta 

2 

and the petitioner must demonstrate the underlying facts by a 

preponderance of the evidence, Means v. State, 120 Nev. 1001, 1012, 103 

P.3d 25, 33 (2004). We give deference to the district court's factual 

findings regarding ineffective assistance of counsel but review the court's 

application of the law to those facts de novo. Lader v. Warden, 121 Nev. 

682, 686, 120 P.3d 1164, 1166 (2005). 

Appellant argues that counsel was ineffective because she 

delayed in interviewing the victim until after the victim moved to Oregon, 

thereby effectively depriving him of any investigation. Appellant failed to 

demonstrate deficiency or prejudice. Counsel testified at the evidentiary 

hearing that the defense needed to interview other witnesses before 

interviewing the victim, that the victim was ultimately interviewed days 

before trial, and that her version of events had not changed substantially 

from her testimony before the grand jury. Further, the district court's 

finding that appellant failed to present any evidence as to what specific 

information counsel could have obtained had she contacted the victim 

earlier is supported by substantial evidence in the record. Accordingly, 

appellant failed to demonstrate a different outcome at trial had counsel 

attempted to contact the victim earlier. We therefore conclude the district 

court did not err in denying this claim, and we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

'OM 

Douglas 
3 

JeA. - 

cc: Hon. Janet J. Berry, District Judge 

Story Law Group 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

ININEMINV ,
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**I, Russell K. Girling, Chief Executive Officer of TCPipeLines GP, Inc., the general partner of TC PipeLines, LP (the Partnership),in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hereby certify,**to the best of my knowledge, in connection with the Partnership’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) on the date hereof, that:

·                  the Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

·                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Partnership.
| Dated: April 30, 2007 | /s/ Russell K. Girling                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                  | Russell K. Girling                             |
|                  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|                  | TC PipeLines GP, Inc., as general partner of   |
|                  | TC PipeLines, LP (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, SEAN FROATS, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Alternate Energy
Corp. (the "REGISTRANT");


2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;


4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:


(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;


(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "EVALUATION DATE"); and


(c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our required evaluation as of
the Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):


(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and


6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

                                            BY: /S/ SEAN FROATS

                                            ----------------------------------
                                            SEAN FROATS
                                            SECRETARY
Date: August 9, 2005
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF
2002
 
 I Willard
G. McAndrew, III, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual
report of Energy & Engine Technology Corporation on Form 10-KSB for the
annual period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such annual report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Energy & Engine Technology Corporation.
 
 Date:
      April 15, 2005
    /s/
      Willard G. McAndrew, IIIWillard
      G. McAndrew, IIIChief
      Executive Officer
 
 EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF
2002
 
 I Roger
N. Wurtele, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report of Energy
& Engine Technology Corporation on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended
December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
annual report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Energy & Engine Technology
Corporation.
 
 Date:
      April 15, 2005
    /s/
      Roger N. WurteleRoger
      N. WurteleChief
      Financial Officer
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

49) ll-E-9 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:04 AM Sheet 49 of 264 
P.2 

CONTACT REPORT FORM 

PES PROJECT NO. N204 

Date Company Contact Phone 

08/23/93 LASCO John Davenport (800) 876-3044 

Environmental Affairs 

Description 

The Lancaster, Texas, facility has an incinerator currently 

operating for styrene emissions. Three spray booths are enclosed for 

routing of gelcoating and spray-up emissions. The unit was put in about 

10 years ago at a cost of about $750,000. The efficiency is 95% +. 

The styrene emissions are not high concentrations (<50 ppm) and are 

pulled with existing air in the booth. No pre-concentrating is done. The 

prime reason the unit was installed was odor and personal plant goals, not 

regulation. 

Mr. Davenport did not know if their facility was a major source (10 

tons) or not. He indicated that Sid Pe, Corporate Environmental Manager, 

was a better contact to talk with, Anaheim, California (800/877-2005). He 

also said that two other LASCO facilities have an incinerator, 

Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania, and South Boston, Virginia. He had not heard 

of the idea of South Boston taking their unit out as PES has previously 

heard.