12/03/201 0 17:3 1 425227100 7 ANM 7 PAG E 02/1 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S 9 1 0 1 1

1 2 1 3 1 4 I S 1 6 1 7 l e 1 3 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 SCOT T R . MORRI S FA A OFFIC E O FREGiorJA

L COUNSEL 160 1 LIN D AVE. , S W RENTON , WASHINGTO N 9805 7 TELEPHONE : 425/227-1.41 7 FACSIMILE : 425/227-100 7 

### 'iPARTMEN T O F ^^N^PORWtO N .riTDPERATiCN S 

### UNITE D STATE S O F AMERIC A DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N OFFIC E O F HEARING S J . RANDOLP

H BABBITT , Administrator , Federa l Aviatio n Administration , COMPLAINAN

T vs . 

### SCENIC AVIATION , INC. , RESPONDEN

T FA A DOCKE

T CP09NM001 1 FA A Cas e No . 2009NM07006 6 DM S No . FAA-2009-097 4 MOTIO N T O COMPE

L DISCOVER

Y an d [MOTIO N T O SHORTE

N TIM E T O RESPON

D Judg e GOODWI

N TO : Judg e Goodwin : Motio n to Compe l Discover y 

### Complainant , through hi s undersignedcounsel , pursuan t to Rule s o f Practic e 13.220(1)(1) , hereby move s tha

t th e Requests fo

r Admission s file

db y th e Complainan

t o n Septembe

r 23,201 0 b e deeme d admitted . Additionally , Complainant , throug h hi s undersignedcounsel , hereby move s th e Administrative La

w Judg e t o impos e sanction s o

n Responden

t fo r failin g to compl y wit h th e procedura l orde r i n thi s cas e unde

r Rule s o f Practic e 13.220(n

) by prohibiting Responden

t from introducing a s evidenc e a

t th e hearing an

y materia l no t providedin discover

y a s o f the dat e o f thi s motion . Complainan

t als o move s tha

t Responden

t b e precludediro

mraising certain defense s (i.e . th e financia

l hardshi p defense ) a s the requesteddiscover

y pertain s t

o material s relatedto thos e affirmativ e defenses . Complainan

t move s tha t Responden

t b e precludedfiromchallenging certai n portion s o f the Complaint . I

n the alternative . Complainan t request s th e AL

J to ente r a n orde r compelling discover

y unde r Rule s o f Practic e 13.220(m) . However, i f th e AL J issue s a n orde r Afotio n t o Compe l Discovery Pag e I o f 1 0 Sceni c Aviation , Inc . - CP09>JM00 I J SCOT T R . MoRRts , FAA ATTORKE Y TEL : 425.227.1417 ; FAX ; 425.227.100 712/03/201 0 17:3 1 425227100 7 ANM 7 PAG E 03/1 1

compellin g disccveiy

j an d Responden t

complie s i n atimel y manner , Complainan t reluctantl y ask s th e A U t o conside r

acontinuanc e because , give n tha t th e hearin g start s i n on e ^yeel c Complainan t doubt s tha t

i t ca n revie w th e requeste d material s an d prepar e wit h th e additiona l material s i n tim e t o adequatel y presen t

it s case . 

### Statemen t o f Salien t Facte ^ 1 . O n Augus t

16,2010 , th e A U Amende d th e Procedura l Orde r requirin g th e partie s t o complet e discover y b y Novembe r 29,2010 . DM S Docke t No . FAA200—0974-0020 .

' Th e prior discover y histor y o f thi s cas e i s as follows : 1 . On Marc h 2,2010 , Conqilainaii t serve d Responden t

wit h Complainant' s Initial Discovei y Reques t b y fecsimile an dcertifie dmail . A respons e t o that reques t wa s du e Apri l 2,2010 , Se e DM S Documen t FAA-2009-0974

- 0008 . 2 . Responden t

faile dt o respon d t o tha t

reques t unti l Apri l 9,2010

- However , Responden t di d as k for mor e tim e v«^ic h Complainan t

counse l grante d 3 . O n Marc h 26,2010 , Complainan t serve dResponden t

wit h Complainant' s Firs t

Supplemental Discover

y Reques t b y facsimil e an dcertifie dmail . A respons e t o that reques t wa s du e Apri l 26,2010 . Se e DM S Documen t FAA

2009-0974-0011 . 4 . Th e Procedura l Orde r i n thi s case , entere don Fcbruai y 24,2010 , require d th e partie s t o conclud e discover y b y Ma y 1,2010 . Se e DM S Documen t FAA-2009-0974-0007 . 5 . O n Ma y 13,2010 , undersigne dcounse l sent counse l fo

r responden t

alette r vi aregula

r mai l an d e-mai l inquirin g int o th e statu s o f th e respons e t o Complainant' s Firs t Supplemental Discovery Reques t Th e letter

requeste d a respons e t o tha t

request , an d asupplemental respons e to'Complainant' s Initia l Discovery Request , a s th e initial respons e state dtha t "investigatio n continues " for many o f th e initia l discover

y requests . 6 . Responden t

faile dt o respon d t o Complainant' s Firs t Supplemental Discovery Reques t unti l Ma y 18,2010 , Again , Respondent' s counse l requeste dan dCoroplarnant' s counse l grante d thi s extensio n o f tim e t o comply . 7 . O n Ma y 27,2010 , Responden t supplcmcntcs d it s discovei y respons e b y addin g document s an d witnesse s for th e afBnnativ e defens e o f finaacial abilit

y t o pay . 8 . O n Jun e 30,2010 , Complainant' s counse l discovere d tha t i t ha d no t provide d Respondent s counse l wit h a CD . Thi s C D containe dth e photograph s o f th e logbook s previousl y provide d wherea s th e prio r discover y respons e had onl y provide d photocopie s o f thos e photographs . 9 . O n Jul y 1,2010 , Respondent's counse l fileda n unoppose d motio n fo r

acontinuanc e for

th e hearb g se t

to begi n on Jul y 13,2010 , I n thi s motio n Responden t claime dprejudic e b y no t

havin g receive d picture s o f th e logbook s a s oppose d t o th e previousl y provide d photocopie s o f thos e pictures . A s par t

o f thi s reques t

"Responden t

respectfull y request s acontinuanc e o f

A c schedule dhearin g i n orde r t o conduc t

meaningfu l discovei y in thi s matter , includin g bu t no t limite d t o th e opportunity t o identif y exper t witnesse s wit

h regard t o th e newl y discovere d documents. " Se e DM S Documen t

FAA-2009-0974-0016 . para . 9 . 10 . On Jul y 2,20 ] 0 , th e A U grante d Respondent' s Motio n fo r aContinuance . Se e DM S Documen t FAA

2009-0974-0014 . n . O n Jul y 21,2010 , Complainan t supplemente dit s discover y response . Se e DM S Documen t FAA-2009

- 0974^017 . 12 . O n Augus t

16.2010 , Responden t

file di w secon d se t

o f interrogatories , reques t

fo r productio n o f document s andreques t

for admissions . Complainant' s response s wer e du e Septembe r 17,2010 . However , Respondent' s counse l grante dComplainan t a n extensio n unti l Septembe r 24,2010 . 13 . O n Septembe r

23,2010 , Complainan t

responde d t o Respondent' s Secon d Se t o f Discover y Requests . Motio n t o Compe l Discovery Pflge2on O Sceni c Aviation . Tn c - CP09NM001 1 SCOT T R , MORMS , FAA ATTORNE Y TEL : 425.227.1417 ; FAX : 425.227.100 712/03/201 0 17:3 1 425227100 7 ANM 7 PAG E 04/1 1

2 . O n Septembe r

23,2010 , Complainan t

serve d Responden t

with Complainant' s Secon d Supplemental Discovery Reques t b y fex an d certifie d mail . Se e Exhibi t 1

- 3 , Complainant' s Secon dSupplementa l Discovei y Reques t containe d th e followin g Request s for

Admission : t L REQUES T FO RADMISSIO N N O 1 : Admi t tha t Sceni c Aviatio n wa s no t acertificate d repai r

statio n (per

1 4 C.F.R , Par t

145 ) durin g th e perio d 1 Jul y 200 7 throug h an d includin g 3 0 Marc h 2009 . b . REQUES T FO RADMISSIO N NO . 2 : Admi t that , durin g th e perio d1 Jul y 200 7 throug h an d includin g 3 0 Marc h 2009 , Sceni c Aviatio n was no t 1 0 authorize dt o performmaintenanc e pe r acontinuou s airworthines s 1 1 maintenanc e progra m(CAMP) . 1 2 c . REQUES T FO RADMISSIO N NO . 3 : Admi t that , durin g th e perio d IJul y 1 3 200 7 throug h an d includin g 3 0 Marc h 2009 , Sceni c Aviatio n wa s authorize d 1 4 t o perfor mmaintenanc e pe r

an approve d aircraf

t inspectio n progra m 1 5 approve dunde r 1 4 C.F.R . § 135.419 . 1 6 d . REQUES T FO RADMISSIO N NO . 4 ; Admi t tiiat , durin g th e perio d 1 7 Augus t 1,200 7 - January 28,2008 , whe n Sceni c Aviatio n operate d 1 8 N322I M i n controlle d airspace , i t use d th e transponde r

aboard th e aircraft , 1 9 e . REQUES T FO RADMISSIO N NO . 5 : Admi t that , durin g th e perio d Jul y 2 0 10,200 7 - Decembe r 10,2008 , whe n Sceni c Aviatio n operate d N5 5 8S A i n 2 1 controlle dairspace , i t use d tli e transponde r

aboar d th e aircrajft .

Motio n t o Compe l Discovery SCOT T R , MORRIS , FA A ATTORNE Y Page3o f 1 0 TEL : 425.227.14I7 ; FAX : 425.227.100 7 Sceni c Aviation . Inc . - CP09NM001 112/03/201 0 17:3 1 425227100 7 ANM 7 PAG E 05/1 1

1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 

### f

. REQUES T FO

RADMISSIO

N NO . 6 ; Admi

t that , durin g the perio d Octobe r 19,200 7 - March 25,2009 , whe n Scenic Aviation operate

d N617M M in controlledairspace , i

t use dth e transponde

r aboar dth e aircraft . 4 . I n accordanc e wit

h Rule s o f Practic e 13.220(d) , arespons e wa s du e no late r tha n Octobe r 23,2010 . 5 . Complainan

t received afacsimile confirmatio n shovraig "2 0 pages " sen

t "ok " o n Septembe r 23,201 0 a

t 10:5 6 am . Se

e Exhibit 2 . 6 . Th e certifie d mailing of

Complainant' s Secon

dSupplementa

l Discover y Reques t wa s returned b y th e U.S . Posta

l Servic e to Complainant' s offic e on Octobe

r 19,201 0 a s •'unclaimed. " However, th e regula

r mail wa s no

t returned . Se

e Exhibi t 3 . 7 . O n Septembe

r 30,2010 , the A U re-scheduledtlii s hearing fo r 1 3 -1 5 December, 2010 . DM S Docke

t No . FAA-2009-0974-0023 . 8 . O n Octobe r 21,2010 , Responden

t wa s re-servedwit

h Complainant' s Secon

d Supplementa

l Discover y Reques t o n Octobe r 21 , 201 0 b

y overnigh t courie r - Federa l Expres s an

d facsimile . Se

e Exhibi t 4 . 9 . O n Octobe r 28,2010 , undersignedcounse l requestedtha

t Respondent' s counse

l provid e an updat e o n the statu s o

f Respondent' s respons e to Complainant' s Secon dSupplementa

l Discover y Request . Se

e Exhibit 5 , a t 5-2 . 10 . O n Novembe

r 1,2010 , Respondent' s counse l aske dtha t athir dse t o f Complainant' s supplementa

l discover y request s b e sen

t t o him . Se

e Exhibi t 5 , a t 5-2 , 11 . Pe r the reques t

o f Respondent' s counse

l u i respons e t

o tha t inquiry , Complainant' s counse l serve d Responden

t wit h Complainant' s Secon

dSupplementa

l Discover y Request by e-mai l on Novembe

r 1,2010 . Se

e Exhibi t 5 , a t 5 -1 . Motio n t o Compe l Discovery Pag e 4 o f 1 0 Sceni c Aviation , Inc . - CP09NM001 1 SCOT T R . MORRIS , FA A ArroRJffi v TEL : 425.227.1417 ; FAX : 425.227.100 712/03/201 0 17:3 1 425227100 7 ANM 7 PAG E 06/1 1

1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 € 1 7 I B 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 

### 12 . O

n Novembe

r 15,2010 , Respondent' s counse l representedtha

t their discover y respons e would b e sen

t in th e mail tha

t day . Se e Exhibi t 5 , a t 5-1 . 13 . On Decembe

r 1,2010 , settlemen

t discussion s ha

dnot bee n fruitftJ, andComplainant' s counsel notified Respondent' s counse l tha t he ha dunti l Decembe

r 3,201 0 to produc e th e requested discover y o r h e woul d b e force d to file amotion to compel . Se e Exhibi t 6 , AJ.S 0 o n Decembe

r 1 , 2010 , Responden

t wa s able t o supplemen

t it s discovei

y respons e notifyin

g Complainan

t o f it s inten t t o us e 3 photograph s no

t previousl y disclose . Se

e Exhibi t 7 . 14 . A s of

Decembe r 3 , 2010 ; 7 1 day s afte

r th e initia l service , 3 2 day s afte

r th e thir d service , an d fou r day s afte r th e dat e se t by the Procedura

l Orde r i n thi s cas e t

o conclud e discovery ; Responden

t ha s no t responded t

o Complainant' s Secon

dSupplementa

l Discover y Request . Discussio n Request s fo rAdmissio n 

### Section 13.220GX^

) o f th e Rule s o

f Practic e states : (1 ) Time . A party' s failur

e to respondto areques t

fo r admission , in writing an d signedb y the attorne

y o r th e party , not

late r tha n 3 0 day s afte r servic e of the request , i s deeme

da n admissio n o f th e trut h o f th e statemen

t o r statement s containedi n th e reques t fo r admission.. . Responden

t ha s ye t to respon dto th e Request s fo

r Admission servedo n Responden t o n Septembe r 23,2010 . Unde

r th e rule , arespons e t

o the Requests fo

r Admission was du

e b y Octobe r 23,2010 . Even grantin

g Responden

t th e benefi t o f tli e doubt tha t Responden

t di dno t actuall y receiv e Complainant' s reques t unti l th e thir dservic e b y e-mai l o n Novembe

r 1,2010 , arespons e woul d hav e bee n du e Decembe r 1,201 0 a t th e latest . B y an

y reasonable measure , th

e deadlin e fo r Respondent' s respons e ha s long passed , an dtherefore , thos e matter s addressedi n Complainant' s Request s fo

r Admissio n serve d o n Septembe

r 23,201 0 shoul

dbe deeme

dadmitte dunde r 13.220(1)(1) , a s no respons e to thos e request s wa s receivedb y Decembe

r 1 , 2010 . Motio n t o Compe l Discovei y Pag e 5 o f 1 0 Sceni c Aviation , Inc . - CP09KM001 1 ScorrR . MORRIS , FA A AmoRNE

V TEL : 425.227.1417 ; FAX ; 425.227.100 712/03/201 0 17:3 1 425227100 7 ANM 7 PAG E 07/1 1

1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 

## n 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 € 2 7 Failur e t o Respon d t o Discover y

Sectio n 13.220(1 ) o f

th e Rule s o f

Practic e states : (1 ) Faitur e t o compl y wit

h adiscover

y orde r o r orde r t o compel . I f aparty fail s t o compl y with adiscovery orde r o r a n orde r t o compel , th e administrativ e la w judge , limite d t o th e exten t o f th e party' s failure t o compl y wit h th e discover y orde r o r motio n t o compel , may : (1 ) Strike tha t

portio n o f

aparty' s pleadings ; (2 ) Preclud e prehearin g o r discovery motion s b y tha t party ; (3 ) Preclud e admissio n o f tha t portio n o f

aparty' s evidenc e a t th e hearing ; or (4 ) Preclud e tha

t portio n o f

th e testimon y o f

tha t party' s witnesse s a

t th e hearing . Complainan t

ha s bee n mor e tha n accommodatin g o f Respondent' s unwillingnes s t o timel y compl y with thei r

discovery obligations , a s show n b y letter s an d e-mail s firomth e undersigne d counse l t o responden t

requestin g update s o n th e statu s o f Respondent' s response s an d refnindin g Responden t

o f th e deadline s fo

r discoveiy . Responden t

ha s not timel y responde d t o an

y o f Complainant' s discovery requests . Respondent' s respons e t o Complainant' s Initial Discovery Reques t was seve n day s late . Respondent' s respons e t o Complainant' s Firs t Supplementa l Discovei y Reques t

was 2 2 day s late , an d was complete d 1 7 day s after th e deadlin e i n th e procedura l orde r the n i n effec t

t o complet e discovery . Thu s far , Responden t ha s faile d t o respon d t o Complainant' s Secon dSupplementa l Discovery Reques t a t all , an d i s thu s over

4 0 day s delinquen t i n respondm g t o tha t

request. Althoug h generall y sanction s ar e ordinaril y onl y impose d wher e aparty fail s t o compl y with a n orde r t o compel , th e rul e provide s tha t sanction s ma

y als o b e impose d i n som e circumstance s befor e a n orde r t o compe l ha s bee n issue d - whe n adiscover y orde r ha s bee n issue d an d no t complie dwith . I n thi s case , tli e Procedura l Orde r issue d o n February 24,2010 , a s amende d o n Motio n t o Cony>e

t Discovery ScoT T R , MORWS . FA A ATTORNE Y Pag e 6 o f 1 0 TEL ; 425,227.1417 ; FAX : 425.227,100 7 Sceni c Aviation , Inc . - CP09NM001 112/03/201 0 17:3 1 425227100 7 ANM 7 PAG E 08/1 1



### Augus t 16,2010 , required the conclusion o f discover y no late r tha n Novembe

r 29,2010 . Responden

t ha s faile d to compl y wit h tha t deadline , thus , responden

t ha s faile dt o compl y wt h a discovet y order . It follow s tha

t sanction s ma

y therefor e b e imposedunde

r 13,220(1) . Although sanction ma

y b e a n extrem e remedy , i t

i s a n appropriat

e on e wher e aResponden

t ha s no t complie d wit

h adiscover

y order , "particularl

y i n th e contex t o f it s patter n o f failur e to voluntaril y compl y wit h Complainant' s discover

y requests. " I

n th e Matte r o f America n Aviation , Inc. , FA A Docke t No . CP06NM0006 , DMS FAA-2006-2587 6 (2007) . Respondent' s failur e t o timel y compl y wit h an y o f Complainant' s discover

y requests , an

deve n the n onl y whe n cajole d by counse l fo r th e Complainant , constitute s suc h apattern . 1 0 Th e requested informatio n in Complainant' s discover y request s ar

e i n direc t respons e t o 1 1 certai n aspect s o f

thi s case . I

n particular , the Interrogatorie s an dsevera l o f th e Requests fo

r 1 2 Productio n ar

e request s t

o provid e inforination concernin

g Respondent' s affirmativ

e defense s 1 3 raisedinit s Answe

r t o th e Amende

dComplaint , datedAugus t

6,1010 , DM S Docke

t Nb.FAA

1 4 2009-0974-0021 . Th

e requested documents an

dInterrogatorie s ar

e essentia l t o mee t severa l o f 1 5 thos e afl5rroativ

e defenses ; specificall

y affirmativ

e defens e 1,3,5 , an

d6 . Responden

t canno t b e 1 6 allowed to rais e thes e defense s i f it will no t answe r the requestedInterrogatorie s o r produc e th e 1 7 requeste d documents . Th e response s t o thes e request s ar e necessar y t o evaluat e the merit s of

thos e l adefenses . A s Responden t ha s failedto respondto discover y tha t wouldallo w th e probuig of thos e 1 9 defense s i t

should b e barred ftomasserting thos e defense s a t th e hearing . The remainin

g request s 2 0 fo r productio n ar

e necessar y t o coiroborat

e an dsuppor t th e Complainants cas e i n chief . 2 1 Complainan

t ha s agood fait

h basi s to believ e tha

t thes e documents existe da

t th e tim e of tli e 2 2 reques t

and their production wovil

d suppor t it s factua l allegations . Th

e refusa l t o produce thes e

Moti/^ n t o Compe l Discovety SCOT T R . MORRJS , FA A ATTORNE Y Pag e 7 O f 1 0 TEL : 425.227,1417 ; FAX : 425.227.100 7 Sceni c Avipiion , Inc . - CP09T'^00 ] I12/03/201 0 17:3 1 425227100 7 ANM 7 PAG E 09/1 1



### record s potentially weaken s the Complainant' s case . A s it ha s the burden , the denia

l o f thi s evidenc e prejudice s it s case . Should th e Judg e b e disincline dt o orde r sanctions , section 13.220(m ) o f th e Rule s o f Practic e states : 5 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 I S 1 7 I S .1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 

### (m

) Motio n t o compe l discovery . A part

y ma y mak e amotion to compe l discover y i f aperso n refiise s t

o answe r aquestio n durin

g a deposition , apart

y fail s o r refuse s to answe

r a n interrogatory , if

a person give s a

n evasiv e o

r incomplet e answe r during adeposition o

r whe n respondin

g t o a n interrogatory , o

r apart y fail s o r refiise s t o produc e documents o

r tangibl e items.. , In th e alternative , Complainan t move s th e Judg e to ente

r a n Orde r to Compe l Discover y wit h adeadline fo

r production n o late

r tha n Decembe

r 8,2010 , i n accordanc e wit

h thi s Rule o

f practice . Fvirther

, Complainan

t ca n n o longe r represen t tha t eve n i f th e discover

y i s produce

d b y Decembe r 8,2010 , tha

t it will hav e adequat

e tim e t o prepar e it s cas e adjustin

g fo r th e produced document s an

d ma y well have t o reques t

acontinuance . Conclusio n THEREFORE , Complainan t move s th e Administrative La w Judg e t o ente r a n orde r finding tha t th e six Request s fo

r Admission containedin Complainant' s Secon dSupplementa

l Discover y reques t b e deeme d admitted . Complainan

t als o move s the Admmistrative La w Judg e t o impos e sanction s o n Responden

t fo r failin g to compl y wit h the procedura

l orde r i n thi s cas e unde

r Rule s o f Practic e 13.220(n)(l ) by striking Respondent' s defense s 1,3, 5 an d6 . Further , Complainan

t move s th e Admmistrativ e La

w Judg e t o prohibite dth e introduction int o evidenc e o f

an y materia l b y th e Responden

t o f an y materia l no t providedb

y the Responden

t in discovery . I n the alternative , Complainan t move s tha n a n orde r be enteredcompelling Responden t t o respon d to Complainant' s Secon

dSupplementa

l Discover y Reques t by Decembe

r 8,201 0 an d to

Motior i t o Compe l Discovery ScOT T R . MORRLS

, FA A ATTORNE

Y Pag e 8 o f 1 0 TEL : 425.227.1417 ; FAX : 425,227,100 7 Sc<ni c Aviation , Inc . - CP09NM001 112/03/201 0 17:3 1 425227100 7 ANM 7 PAG E 10/1 1

6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 12 ( 1 3 favorabl e conside r

grantm g aComplainan t

reques t for continuanc e i f

afte r revie w o f

th e produce d document s i t

believe s tha t

i t need s mor e tim e t o prepare . GIVE N tha t

thi s hearin g i s schedule d t o begi n i n te n days , Complainan t als o Move s tha t Responden t

hav e unti l CO B o n Decembe r 7,201 0 t o respond , an d tha t th e AL J orde r

aconferenc e cal l t o addres s th e issu e an dhi s ruling . DATE D thi s 3r dday o f

December , 2010 . MORRI S ?A A Attorne y

Motio n t o Compe l Discovery Pag e 9 o f 1 0 Sceni c Aviation , Inc . - CPO91SM001 1 SCOT T R . MORRIS , FA A ATTORNEY TEL : 425.227.1417 ; FAX ; 425.227.100 712/03/201 0 17:3 1 425227100 7 ANM 7 PAG E 11/1 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 6 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 € 2 7 2 6 2 9 3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 6 3 7 3 8 3 9 4 0 4 1 4 2 4 3 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 7 CERTIFICAT E OF SERVIC E I hereb y certif

y tha t th e foregoin g Complainant' s Motion t o Compe l ha s bee n serve d via facsimil e an dCertifie dMai l - Retur n Receip t Requeste d thi s date , t o th e following : Th e Honorabl e Richar d C . Goodwi n Offic e o f hearings , M-2 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun d Floor , R mE l 2-32 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 0 TEL : 202.366.213 9 FAX : 202.366.753 6 (an db y email ) Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenu e S W Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W100 0 FAX : 202.493.502 0 Gregory S . Winto n Aviatio n La w Experts , LL C 33 0 Aviatio n Way Frederick , M D 2170 1 TEL : 301.294.855 0 FAX : 301.294.252 5 (an db y email )

DATE D thi s 3r dda

y o f December , 2010 .

MOIFAI RC I Offic e o f Regiona l Counse l (ANM-7 ) Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 160 1 Lin d Ave . S W Renton , W A 9805 7 (425 ) 227-216 0

Motion t o Compel Discover y Pag e 1 0 of

1 0 Scenic Aviation , Inc . - CP09NM001 1 SCOT T R . MOMUS , FA

A ATTORNE

Y TEL : 425.227.1417 ; FAX : 425.227.1007