alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
                                 NEOPHARM, INC.
                       CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                             FOR DECEMBER 31, 1996



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        12/31/94      12/31/95      12/31/96
                                      ------------  ------------  ------------
 <S>                                  <C>           <C>           <C>

 Net loss for the period              $(1,083,667)  $(1,669,627)  $(1,865,645)

 Weighted average shares outstanding     3,438,740     4,698,446     7,803,412
                                      ============  ============  ============

 Net loss per share                        ($0.32)       ($0.36)       ($0.24)
                                      ============  ============  ============
</TABLE>

                                                                              41
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

D.M., a child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-3370

[November 16, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Kathleen J. Kroll, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2014-CJ003349A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, KLINGENSMITH, JJ., and BELANGER, ROBERT, Associate Judge,

concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the
requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.

The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of CCF Holding Company (the small business issuer), hereby certifies as follows:

The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the small business issuer (the Report), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the small
business issuer.

Dated this 30th day of March, 2006.



/s/ Mary Jo RogersMary Jo Rogers, Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We   consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the
registration statements of XCL Ltd. and Subsidiaries on Form
S-3  (File Nos. 33-41458, 33-83122 and 33-68552) and on Form
S-8  (File Nos. 33-62956 and 33-59799) of our report,  which
includes  an  explanatory paragraph regarding the  Company's
ability  to  continue as a going concern,  dated  April  12,
1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements
and   financial   statement  schedule  of   XCL   Ltd.   and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and  for  the
years  ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, which  report
is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.






Miami, Florida
April 12, 1999
#### SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY v. LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION.

No. 59705.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 24,1978.

In re: Motion for further consideration and supplemental brief.

Denied.

SANDERS, C. J.,

dissented from the judgment in this case, but concurs in the denial of this motion on the ground that the judgment rendered does not permit this request for reconsideration.

SUMMERS and MARCUS, JJ., would grant.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. John E. MILLER.

No. 60098.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 19, 1977.

Sam J. D’Amico, D’Amico & Curet, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

*258William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ossie Brown, Dist. Atty., Richard Chaffin, Marilyn C. Castle, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-ap-pellee.

DENNIS, Justice.

Defendant was found guilty after trial by jury of theft of property of more than $500 in value.1 La.R.S. 14:67. Imposition of sentence was suspended. Defendant, was placed on supervisory probation for a period of two years and ordered to pay court costs involved in his prosecution.

On appeal, defendant relies upon five assignments of error. A review of the record and defendant’s assignments2 reveals no reversible error. Accordingly, defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.

1

. A prior conviction and sentence arising out of the same incidents were reversed and the case was remanded for a new trial. *State v. Miller,*319 So.2d 339 (La.1975).

2

. Defendant filed thirty assignments of error. Twenty-five of these were not briefed or argued and are considered to have been abandoned. The assignments that were briefed present insubstantial questions concerning the sufficiency of the State’s answer to a bill of particulars; the overruling of defendant’s motion to quash upon grounds of prescription; the introduction of a cancelled check drawn upon the account of defendant’s attorney to prove restitution; the district attorney’s reference to “the last hearing” in the presence of the jury; and the assessment of court costs to the defendant.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 246 (Monday, December 23, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 77327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30654]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 246 / Monday, December 23, 2013 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 77327]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 42

Standards for Condition of Food Containers

CFR Correction

    In Title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 27 to 52, 
revised as of January 1, 2013, on page 203, in Sec.  42.132, in 
paragraph (a), in the table, for the entry 6.5, under ``Reduced'', in 
column T, the entry ``1'' is added.

[FR Doc. 2013-30654 Filed 12-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
# September auditorium streaming events archive

/ Published Sept. 29, 2017
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
The video archive is CAC enabled and restricted to DLA associates.

## September 6

      - FL Director's Call

## September 13

      - Acquisition Forum

## September 15

      - POW/MIA Day

## September 20

      - FM Director's Call

## September 27

      - Hispanic Heritage Month

## September 28

      - LDC Speaking Event
      - J61 Town Hall
# Staff helps heat up winter training for artillery unit

/ Published Dec. 23, 2017
Gimcheon, South Korea, 
Timely customer engagement by Defense Logistics Agency employees has helped some 2nd Infantry Division soldiers cross heating equipment off their Christmas list.

The Korean peninsula can be a rough place to train during the winter, but the heating equipment acquired by the 6-37th Field Artillery will help with their upcoming field training exercises. Disposal Services Representative Ed Forbes said the Gimcheon staff worked with a unit member to address the shortfall in heating equipment. Forbes said the team at DLA Disposition Services at Gimcheon helped the soldiers identify and reutilize not only heaters but also found other items needed for by the unit. 

With their training exercise only one week away, Forbes said the soldiers were able to reutilize the equipment and convoy a team to the Gimcheon facility to pick up the items, which included environmental control units and Deployable Rapid Assembly Shelter tent support systems. Other items found were light sets and tool kits.

“Mr. Charles Thomas met with these warfighters to make sure that the soldiers’ pick up and RTD experience with DLA was a success,” Forbes said.

The team also provided a tour of the warehouse to identify any other items needed by this unit. Forbes said the soldiers were delighted with the tour and believes they will be reutilizing more items in the near future. 

“This customer engagement will foster a greater working relationship with our warfighters and hopefully will lead to more reutilization by ... organizations on the Korean peninsula,” Forbes said.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MFIC Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael C. Ferrara, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|                     |  | /s/MICHAEL C. FERRARAMichael C. Ferrara
Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 17, 2008 |  |                                                                

---



QuickLinks
ACCEPTED04-14-00626-CRFOURTH COURT OF APPEALSSAN ANTONIO, TEXAS2/6/2015 12:34:57 PMKEITH HOTTLECLERK
#### Newt V. MILLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jerry A. ADAMS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13371.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

Oct. 31, 1977.

En Banc. Rehearing Denied Dec. 5, 1977.

Writ Granted Jan. 20, 1978.

Emmons, Henry & Reeves by Joseph A. Reeves, Jr., Jonesboro, for plaintiff-appellant.

Baker, Culpepper & Brunson by James R. Hatch, Jonesboro, for defendant-appellee.

Before HALL, MARVIN and JONES, JJ.

MARVIN, Judge.

An appellant may negate the presumption of abandonment of an appeal when he appears or otherwise informs the court *before or at the time the appeal is called for argument*that he intends not to abandon the appeal and that he will file a brief. *Walker v. Jones,*253 La. 908, 221 So.2d 44 (1969).

Here, the appellant neither appeared nor filed a brief when the appeal was called for argument on September 27, 1977, and the appeal was dismissed. Rule VII, § 5(b), Uniform Rules — Court of Appeal. Six days later, a brief of the appellant was received by this court, having been postmarked September 30, 1977.

The filing of a brief by the appellant *after*the appeal is dismissed does not negate the presumption under Rule VII unless *before*the case is called for argument appellant notifies the court that a brief will be filed forthwith.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1457 

To extend the suspension of duty on Baytron C-R. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2005 

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Baytron C-R. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BAYTRON C-R. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.38.15 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain aqueous catalytic preparations) is amended by 

7 striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 20

- 00396

- CV

Shattuck LLC, Appellant

v.

Mary Kleypas, as Independent Executor and as Beneficiary of the Estate of

Gregory K. Shattuck, Deceased, Appellee

FROM THE PROBATE COURT NO. 1 OF TRAVI S COUNTY
NO. C

- 1

- PB

- 20

- 001014, THE HONORABLE GUY S. HERMAN, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Shattuck LLC has filed an unopposed moti on to dismiss this appeal.

We g rant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)

.

__________________________________________ Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Triana, and Smith

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: November 20, 2020
Exhibit
      3





**Article
      VII-Evidence of Share Ownership and The Transfer of Shares**








**Section
      1.**         **Evidence
      of Share Ownership.**Shares of capital stock of the Company
      may be certificated or uncertificated.  Shares that are certificated
      shall be in such form as shall be determined by the board of directors and
      approved by the OTS.  Such certificates shall be signed by the chief
      executive officer or by any other officer of the Company authorized by the
      board
      of directors, attested by the secretary or an assistant secretary, and sealed
      with the corporate seal or a facsimile thereof.  The signatures of
      such officers upon a certificate may be facsimiles if the certificate is
      manually signed on behalf of a transfer agent or a registrar other than the
      Company itself or one of its employees.  Each certificate for shares
      of capital stock shall be consecutively numbered or otherwise
      identified.  Uncertificated shares shall be evidenced by means of book
      entry.  The name and address of the person to whom the shares are
      issued, with the number of shares and date of issue, shall be entered on the
      stock transfer books of the Company.  All certificates surrendered to
      the Company for transfer shall be canceled and no new certificate shall be
      issued until the former certificate for a like number of shares has been
      surrendered and canceled, except that in the case of a lost of destroyed
      certificate, a new certificate may be issued upon such terms and indemnity
      to
      the Company as the board of directors may prescribe.





**Section
      2.**         **Transfer of
      Shares.**Transfer of shares of capital stock of the Company
      shall be made only on its stock transfer books.  Authority for such
      transfer shall be given only by the holder of record or by his or her legal
      representative, who shall furnish proper evidence of such authority, or by
      his
      or her attorney authorized by a duly executed power of attorney and filed with
      the Company.  Such transfer shall be made only on surrender for
      cancellation of the certificate for such shares or appropriate book
      entry.  The person in whose name shares of capital stock stand on the
      books of the Company shall be deemed by the Company to be the owner for all
      purposes.
# DLA Aviation’s new commander tours industrial support activities

/ Published Aug. 24, 2017
Richmond, Va, 
Straight from completing the Capstone Military Leadership Program at Fort Lesley J. McNair in Washington, District of Columbia, Air Force Brig. Gen. Linda Hurry, Defense Logistics Agency Aviation commander, began a round of tours to four of the activity’s industrial support activity sites Aug. 21-25. 

Hurry started her visits at DLA Aviation-San Diego in North Island, California, on Aug. 21, meeting DLA Aviation employees and sharing her leadership philosophy.  She also met Navy customers while touring the Fleet Readiness Center-Southwest.

During the week-long tour, Hurry will also visit DLA Aviation at Ogden, Hill Air Force Base, Utah; DLA Aviation at Warner Robins, Robins Air Force Base, Georgia; and DLA Aviation-Jacksonville, Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, Florida.
UNSCANNABLE ITEMS NOT INCLUDED IN THE 

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DMS DOCKET

DMS Docket Number: FAA-2008-0314

Directorate Identifier: 2008-NE-09-AD

Name/ Description of Unscannable Item

Lycoming Engines Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) No. 580, dated February 15, 

2008

Kelly Aerospace Power Systems MSB No. 029, dated February 1, 2008

Kelly Aerospace Power Systems MSB No. 030, Revision A, dated April 1, 2008

Kelly Aerospace Power Systems MSB No. 031, dated February 28, 2008

________________________________________________________________

SERVICE INFORMATION MAY BE EXAMINED AT:

National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202 741 6030; or go to:

http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html

or

Federal Aviation Administration

New England Region

Office of the Regional Counsel

12 New England Executive Park

Burlington, MA 01803

by appointment, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays
# EUR-Lex - 41998D0012 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 41998D0012

**The Schengen acquis - Decision of the Executive Committee of 21 April 1998 on the exchange of statistics on issued visas (SCH/Com-ex (98) 12) **

*
Official Journal L 239 , 22/09/2000 P. 0196 - 0196 *

DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

of 21 April 1998

on the exchange of statistics on issued visas

(SCH/Com-ex (98)12)

THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE,

Having regard to Article 9 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement,

Having regard to Article 16 of the abovementioned Convention,

Whereas the exchange of statistics at local level on visas which have been issued and officially refused will enable the various representations to gain an insight into the overall trends in visa applications from countries within their jurisdiction and any possible shifts in applications from one Schengen Partner mission on post to another;

Whereas the above overview will enable local consular cooperation to examine the reasons for any trends observed, in particular relating to visa shopping, to draw practical conclusions and, where appropriate, to make the necessary recommendations to their respective national authorities;

Having regard to the heavy administrative burden on the diplomatic missions and consular posts as a result of having to exchange monthly statistics on short-stay visas which have been issued and officially refused, requested in note SCH/II (95)50 rev. 2 from Working Group II to the Central Group,

Whereas on the other hand, given that LTV's should only be issued in exceptional cases, the monthly exchange at local level of statistics on the issue of such visas should continue on a monthly basis,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Statistics on short-stay visas which have been issued and officially refused, transit visas and airport transit visas shall be exchanged every quarter.

2. Without prejudice to the obligations arising from Article 16 of the Schengen Convention and explained in Annex 14 to the Common Consular Instructions, according to which the Schengen States shall communicate any data relating to the issuing of LTV's within a period of 72 hours, the Schengen diplomatic missions and consular posts are hereby earnestly reminded of their obligation (SCH/Com-ex decl. 4) to exchange on a monthly basis statistics on LTV's issued the previous month and to pass on these statistics to their respective central authorities.

3. Chapter VIII of the Common Consular Instructions shall be completed accordingly(1).

Brussels, 21 April 1998.

The Chairman

J. Vande Lanotte

(1) See document SCH/Com-ex(99)13.
Exhibit 32

<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report Northeast Indiana Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification (the
"Report"), I, Stephen E. Zahn, the Chief Executive Officer and I, Randy J.
Sizemore, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


By: /s/ Stephen E. Zahn                        By: /s/ Randy J. Sizemore
    -------------------                            ---------------------
Name: Stephen E. Zahn                          Name: Randy J. Sizemore
Chief Executive Officer                        Chief Financial Officer
March 26, 2004                                 March 26, 2004
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Hal R. COLLUMS.

No. 62330.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 1, 1978.

In re: Hal R. Collums applying for supervisory writs. Parish of Orleans.

Granted; the ruling of the trial judge that the request for subpoena is “burdensome” is set aside, and an evidentiary hearing is ordered to determine whether production of the requested information would in fact be “burdensome”.
# L_2023159DE.01015201.xml

| 22.6.2023 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 159/152 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2023

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 159/152

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2023/860 der Kommission vom 25. April 2023 zur Änderung und Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2022/128 in Bezug auf Transparenz, die Verwaltungserklärung, die Koordinierungsstelle, die bescheinigende Stelle und bestimmte Vorschriften für den EGFL und den ELER

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 111 vom 26. April 2023
  )

Seite 35, Anhang zur Änderung der Anhänge I, VIII und IX der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2022/128, Anhang IX, Tabelle, Überschrift der Codes „V.1“ bis „V.8“, Spalte 2 „Bezeichnung der Maßnahme/der Interventionskategorie/des Sektors“:

Anstatt:

„
  Vorhaben im Rahmen von Interventionskategorien in Form von Direktzahlungen gemäß Artikel 69 der Verordnung (EU) 2021/2115
  “

muss es heißen:

„
  Vorhaben im Rahmen von Interventionskategorien zur Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums gemäß Artikel 69 der Verordnung (EU) 2021/2115
  “.

---