alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32(a)

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 of Citizens Holding Company (the Company), as
filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), I, Greg L. McKee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 7, 2006 |  | /s/ Greg L. McKee      
|                     |  | Greg L. McKee          
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This document contains summary financial information extracted from the
Registant's Unaudited Balance Sheets as at June 30, 2000 and Statement of
Operations for the period then ended and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          22,805
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,495,058
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,856,702)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               803,461
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 803,462
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          651,095
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,498
<OTHER-SE>                                     147,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   803,462
<SALES>                                        404,032
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               404,032
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  253,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                150,493
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            150,493
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   150,493
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-11-00597- CR

Albert Jam es Sm ith, App ellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 167 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -DC- 11- 9040 48, H ONO RAB LE MI CHAEL LY NCH, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Albert S mith filed hi s notice of appea l in the t rial court in Septemb er o f 2011. The repor

ter’s rec ord was filed in this Court on Dec ember 8, 2011. Smit h has filed a motion asking that we abate this case to the trial court beca use the repor

ter’s rec ord lacks a video rec ording of a statement S mith made to investigating officer s. At trial, Smit h moved t o introduce the video
u n d e r th e r u le o f o p ti o n a l c o mp le te n e s s . S e e T e x. R. E v id
. 1 0 7
. T h e tria l c o u r t o v e r r u le d th e mo ti o n , but Smit h reque sted that the video be included in the rec ord in order to prese rve the issue for appea l. T h e trial court indicated that the video would be included in the rec ord, but for som e u n k n o wn
rea son, the video is not in the reporte r’s re cord.

Smit h assert s t h at this video is rele vant to one of his issues on appea l, and thus reque sts that we abate this appea l and rema nd this cause to the trial court to incorporate the videotape into the repor

ter’s rec ord. See Tex. R. App. P. 34
. 6 (e )( 3 ) (“I f the dispute [about acc urac y of therec ord ] ar i ses afte r the repor ter’s rec ord has been filed in the appellate court, that court may submit the dispute to the trial court for resolution.”); see also Amador v. State , 221 S.W .3d 666, 677 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (explaining when appellate court should abate appea l to corr ect rec ord). We g rant Smit h’s motion to abate this appea l to the trial court to overse e the completion of the repor ter’s
rec ord as r equeste d. See Tex. R. App. 34.6(e)(3)
.

__________________________________________ Diane M. H enson, Jus tice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pury ear and He nson Abated Filed: Aug ust 23, 2012 Do Not Publish

2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 171 (Thursday, September 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23435]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (97-128)]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Aeronautics and Space Transportation 
Technology Advisory Committee (ASTTAC); Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a forthcoming meeting of the NASA Advisory 
Council, Aeronautics and Space Transportation Technology Advisory 
Committee.

DATES: September 30, 1997, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Room 7H46, 
300 E Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Mary-Ellen McGrath, Office of Aeronautics and Space Transportation 
Technology, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, 
DC 20546 (202/358-4729).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

--Aeronautics and Space Transportation Technology Overview
--Subcommittee Reports
--Scenario-Based Vehicle Study
--Aviation Safety Research Initiative
--Update of Enterprise Planning

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

    Dated: August 28, 1997.
Leslie M. Nolan,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-23435 Filed 9-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
EXHIBIT
      99.1





PRESS
      RELEASE


For
      Immediate Release





Atlantic
      BancGroup, Inc. announces year-end 2007 results.





JACKSONVILLE
      BEACH, FLORIDA, January 30, 2008





Atlantic
      BancGroup, Inc., the parent company of Oceanside Bank, with four locations
      in
      the Jacksonville Beaches and East Jacksonville, Florida, announces year-end
      2007
      results.





Despite
      a
      significant downturn in key economic trends in the market we serve, Atlantic
      BancGroup, Inc. posted net income of $1,406,000 for the twelve months ended
      December 31, 2007.  Due to the overall downward trend in Florida real
      estate markets, we expect 2007 earnings for Florida financial institutions
      in
      general to fall short of 2006 results; that trend was evident through September
      30, 2007.





During
      2007, we reported a 26.7% decrease in consolidated earnings from the 2006
      reported total of $1,918,000.  Fully diluted earnings per share for
      the twelve months of 2007 totaled $1.13 as compared with $1.54 for the same
      period of 2006.  Additional loan loss reserves set aside in 2007
      accounted for approximately 91% of the $512,000 decline in consolidated earnings
      in 2007 over 2006. Substantially all of the additional reserves were
      attributable to the recent weakening of the local economy, real estate markets
      and management’s recognition thereof.





Atlantic
      BancGroup, Inc. posted net income of $274,000 for the fourth quarter of 2007,
      a
      decrease of $236,000 or 46.3% earned over the same period of 2006. Fully diluted
      earnings per share decreased to $.22 per share for the fourth quarter of 2007
      compared to $.41 per share for the same period of 2006.  Additional
      loan loss reserves set aside by management in the fourth quarter of 2007
      accounted for approximately 58% of the decline in consolidated earnings with
      lower net interest income from slowing loan demand and higher cost of funds
      also
      contributing to the decline.





Consolidated
      total assets at December 31, 2007, reached $260.3 million, an increase of 6.9%
      over December 31, 2006.  Consolidated deposits and consolidated net
      loans grew 12.9% and 14.6%, respectively, over the same period, with
      consolidated deposits at $217.5 million and consolidated net loans at $201.9
      million at December 31, 2007.





Atlantic
      BancGroup, Inc. is a publicly-traded bank holding company, trading on the NASDAQ
      Capital Market, symbol ATBC.
# IOSCO students tour DLA Distribution Eastern Distribution Center

/ Published July 17, 2018
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Students of the Navy Supply Corps School’s International Officer Supply Course toured DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania’s Eastern Distribution Center warehouse in New Cumberland July 10.

The purpose of the visit was to receive an overview of DLA and DLA Distribution mission capabilities and tour the Defense Department’s largest distribution warehouse.

As part of the IOSCO travel phase, this visit provides students a better understanding of the scale and scope of defense logistics.  The EDC tour helps them better understand the logistics distribution process.  

The group toured various locations within the warehouse – Receiving Operations and Processing, Storage Retrieval and Sortation Systems, which included a visit to the high rise storage and active item systems sections, and the Outloading Operations which encompasses Air Line of Communication Pallet Build Operations and CONUS/OCONUS Surface Staging.

IOSCO is designed to familiarize students with the organizational structure of the United States Government, United States Navy, Navy Supply Systems Command, Defense Logistics Agency, and the relationship to the Foreign Military Sales – FMS – process. IOSCO addresses the Logistics Supply Chain, defined as identifying, locating, ordering and tracking assets.

IOSCO Class Instructor, Navy Lt. Ryan Matlock, organized the tour.  He said students learn about DLA and its processes during the course. 

“DLA is a huge supplier ... so it’s good for them to come and see what is actually in the warehouses, and the incoming and outgoing actions,” said Matlock.

Mexico Naval Officer, Lt. Cmdr. Marvin Colorado, found the tour very useful.

“It’s good to see the operation up close because it reinforces what we learn in the classroom,” said Colorado.
#### Carl W. MERRITT, Sr. v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 49850.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 26, 1977.

Thomas L. Zebert, Pearl, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Wayne Snuggs, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before SUGG, BROOM and LEE, JJ., and NEAL B. BIGGERS, Commissioner.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Rankin County; Rufus H. Broome, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., INZER and SMITH, P. JJ., ROBERTSON, WALKER and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0463 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JUSTIN DALLAS PETERSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 7, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 27 2022

10/27/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0463
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Blaine Froats, the Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report of Alternate Energy Corporation;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal year (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 25, 2008

| |     |                        
| | --- | -----------------------
| | By: | /s/ BLAINE FROATS      
| |     | Blaine Froats          
| |     | Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 11

                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                 (In thousands, except earnings per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   Three months ended
                                       March 31
                                   2000          1999
                                   ----          ----
<S>                               <C>            <C>
Net (loss) income                 ($429)         ($164)
Basic earnings per common share   ($.06)         ($.04)
Diluted earnings per common share ($.06)         ($.04)
Weighted average common shares
outstanding                       8,109          4,817
Weighted average common shares
outstanding assuming              8,109          4,817
dilution
</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALLEN HAMMLER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of CDCR; M. 

SIMAS, Correctional Officer, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 20-15774 

D.C. No. 1:19-cv-00497-DAD-SAB 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 21, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Allen Hammler appeals pro se from the district 

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various 

constitutional violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We 

review de novo the district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Resnick v. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 29 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 20-15774

Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000). We affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed Hammler’s First Amendment claim

because Hammler failed to allege facts sufficient to show that defendants took an 

adverse action against him because of his protected conduct. See Brodheim v. Cry, 

584 F.3d 1262, 1269 (9th Cir. 2009) (elements of a First Amendment retaliation 

claim in the prison context). 

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Hammler’s motion 

for reconsideration because Hammler failed to establish any basis for relief. See

Sch. Dist. No. 1J Multnomah County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262-63 

(9th Cir. 1993) (setting forth standard of review and grounds for reconsideration 

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e)).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
Giovanni Gallucci 13702 Gamma Road, Dallas, TX 75244 469-682-6978 giovanni@gallucci.net

11/4/2015 Petition for Section 333 Exemption I hereby formally request FAA authorization for Giovanni Gallucci (hereafter “PETITIONER”) to operate a UAS for civil (non-governmental) purposes other than for recreation or hobby. PETITIONER requests to be exempted from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary to allow PETITIONER to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection, including but not limited to aerial imaging. PETITIONER requests this exemption for its use of UAS both within and without the United States. PETITIONER frequently travels throughout the United States and Canada for photographic endeavors and seeks to use UAS in accordance with all laws of foreign and domestic governmental authorities. PETITIONER requests this permission to pursue its use of UAS models including DJI Phantom 1, DJI Phantom 2, DJI Phantom 3, 3D Robotics IRIS+, 3D Robotics Solo, or other similar commercially-available and widely-available UAS models. PETITIONER will conduct its use of UAS in a manner which will minimize risk to the NAS, other persons, and property. The following procedures will be followed: (1) UAS will be given a pre-flight inspection before each flight to examine air-worthiness, (2) UAS will not be materially altered from commercial specifications, (3) UAS will not be flown over people, (4) UAS will always be flown within line of sight to operator(s) pursuant to Section 333(b)(1), (5) UAS will never reach altitudes exceeding 199 feet, (6) UAS will never reach speeds exceeding 20 mph, (7) operator will perform a pre-flight visual inspection of the NAS to determine nearby dangers such as low-flying manned or unmanned aerial vehicles, power lines, and buildings, (8) UAS will be checked for flight stability, proper connection to remote control, and proper performance at a very low altitude before reaching the NAS, and (9) non-participating spectators will be asked to stay a safe distance away from the flight path of the UAS and its landing location. PETITIONER is an experienced UAS operator with more than two years of experience. This petition will benefit the public interest. PETITIONER will provide imagery which is not otherwise possible to be captured without the use of a UAV, which will assist non-profits and companies to which the images may be sold, will be used to provide product training and information on the proper use of UAS, and PETITIONER will be able to provide UAS safety information to those with whom he or she comes in contact. Please grant the requested exemption under Section 333. Thank you for taking the time to review this. request.

Giovanni Gallucci