alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 186 (Monday, September 26, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59447-59448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24596]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts; Arts Advisory Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby

[[Page 59448]]

given that two meetings of the Arts Advisory Panel to the National 
Council on the Arts will be held at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506 as follows (ending time 
is approximate):

Arts Education (application review): October 24-26, 2011 in Room 627. 
This meeting, from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. on October 24th and 25th, and from 
9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on October 26th, will be closed.
Musical Theater (application review): October 24-25, 2011 in Room 714. 
This meeting, from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. on October 24th and from 9 a.m. to 
3 p.m. on October 25th, will be closed.

    The closed portions of meetings are for the purpose of Panel 
review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial 
assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities 
Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to 
the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of 
February 15, 2011, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant 
to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels that are open to the public, and if time allows, may be 
permitted to participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion 
of the panel chairman. If you need any accommodations due to a 
disability, please contact the Office of AccessAbility, National 
Endowment for the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20506, 202/682-5532, TDY-TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days 
prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to these meetings can be 
obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel 
Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or 
call 202/682-5691.

    Dated: September 21, 2011.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2011-24596 Filed 9-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
```
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURTOF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN TEXAS 78711 

### ©FF8G0AL BUSINESS ---«**»«*&¥*» <? ^ STATE ©F T -PENALTYFOR 1/14/2015 PRIVATE USE BOWIE, ELLE UNTA

.AMRS3B ?SSSi 

## : sg • „ ncSS 

### Tr. Gt. lNo.,l5?3282?Ai! 02 1R 0002003152 JAN15 2015 MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 78 701 

### t. • • . . . A1_

. WR-82,451-01 

## This is to advise that the Court has^denied without written order the application for 

## writ ofhabeas corpus on thefindings^the trial'courtwithout ahearing. Abel Acosta, Clerk
ELLE UNTA BOWIE NEY UNIT - TDC # 1793227 114PRIVATE ROAD 4303 

### HONDO,'TX 78861-3812 ' U TF

H'H-,irlini'H',M,,u'''lh'il'iillli[|'H|||i|l'i|i'i!M'i
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I,
James M. Hussey, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of NeoPharm, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



|Dated: March 15, 2004 |  |  | /s/JAMES M. HUSSEYJames M. Hussey,
Chief Executive Officer and President
|--------------------- |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
**Farm Real Estate Values (86010)**
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 18-1213

Filed July 3, 2019

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF KARI TIMMONS

AND MATTHEW TIMMONS

Upon the Petition of

KARI TIMMONS,

Petitioner-Appellee,

And Concerning

MATTHEW TIMMONS,

Respondent-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Clarke County, Richard B. Clogg, 

Judge.

Matthew Timmons appeals the denial of his petition to modify the child- and 

spousal-support provisions of a dissolution-of-marriage decree and the award of 

attorney fees to Kari Timmons. AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

Cathleen J. Siebrecht of Siebrecht Law Firm, Des Moines, for appellant.

Christopher R. Kemp of Kemp & Sease, Des Moines, for appellee.

Considered by Mullins, P.J., Bower, J., and Vogel, S.J.*

*Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206 (2019).
2

MULLINS, Presiding Judge.

Matthew Timmons appeals the denial of his petition to modify the child- and 

spousal-support provisions of a dissolution-of-marriage decree and the award of 

attorney fees to Kari Timmons. On our de novo review, we conclude the questions 

presented are not of sufficient importance to justify an opinion, an opinion would 

not have precedential value, and the judgment of the district court is correct. We 

therefore affirm the district court without opinion. See Iowa R. App. P. 6.1203(a). 

As the prevailing party, Kari requests an award of appellate attorney fees. 

See Iowa Code § 598.36 (2018); Schaffer v. Frank Moyer Constr. Inc., 628 N.W.2d 

11, 23 (Iowa 2001) (holding that a statute allowing an award of trial attorney fees

permits an award of appellate attorney fees as well). An award of appellate 

attorney fees is not a matter of right but rests within this court’s discretion. In re 

Marriage of Berning, 745 N.W.2d 90, 94 (Iowa Ct. App. 2007). In determining 

whether to award attorney fees, we consider the needs of the party making the 

request, the ability of the other party to pay, and whether the party making the 

request was obligated to defend the district court’s decision on appeal. Id. Kari 

has not provided an affidavit of attorney fees to support her request and we are 

therefore unable to determine what amount is reasonable. Nevertheless, 

considering the relevant factors as applied to this case, we find an award of 

appellate attorney fees to Kari is appropriate. We accordingly remand the case to

the district court to determine the reasonable amount of appellate attorney fees to 

be paid by Matthew to Kari, not to exceed the $2000 she requested in her brief,

and to enter judgment against Matthew and in favor of Kari in that amount.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
HealthPlan Services Corporation on Form S-3 (File No. 333-16079) and on Form
S-8 (File Nos. 33-00150, 33-97050, 33-97048, 33-92708, 333-07641, 333-07631) of
our report dated December 2, 1994, on our audit of the financial statements of
HealthPlan Services Division (formerly Plan Services Division, a wholly-owned
division of The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation), as of September 30, 1994, and
for the nine-month period then ended, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.



Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

Tampa, Florida
March 27, 1997
# DLA Police officers earn top honors in federal training

/ Published Jan. 16, 2018

Five Defense Logistics Agency police officers received seven awards on graduating from training at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center Jan. 2, a first for DLA.
      - Officer Raymond Stubs, Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, received the Director’s Leadership Award.
      - Officer Paul Warnke, Defense Distribution Depot San Joaquin, California, received the Academic Award for attaining an academic score of 93.38, the second-highest in the class. He also received awards for scoring a perfect 300 on his driving abilities and knowledge and for qualifying as Expert with his 9mm pistol.
      - Officer Heather Wagner, Defense Supply Center Columbus, Ohio, received an award for a perfect driving score of 300.
      - Officer Michael Diamante, Defense Distribution Depot Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, qualified as the Highest Expert with his 9mm pistol, scoring 298 out of a possible 300.
      - Officer Gerson Jimenez-Mercedes, DLA Headquarters, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, received the Distinguished Fitness Award.

FLETC is the nation’s largest provider of law enforcement training for agencies including the Pentagon Force Protection Agency, Secret Service, Central Intelligence Agency and other federal, state, local, and tribal police departments throughout the United States. 

The three-month training tests officers in firearms accuracy, physical fitness, basic law, security and force protection, evasive driving, searches of personnel and buildings, traffic control, dealing with volatile situations and other topics. 

“The accomplishments of these five police officers are a great credit to themselves and represent the commitment and very high quality of professional police officers that serve and protect DLA every day,” said Patrick Wright, staff director for DLA Security and Emergency Services.

He noted DLA police officers directly support the DLA Strategic Plan and the People and Culture Plan by ensuring security of the workforce and the supply chain at all DLA installations. 

“Our DLA police officers understand the job they have accepted and that it does not come with a lot of gratitude,” Wright said. 
“However. the next time you see a DLA police officer, think about them standing in the frigid, hot or rainy weather — including holidays — to protect us, and give them a simple thank you.”
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 18
- 00070
- CR

Samantha Nicole Thorp , Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 390TH DISTR ICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- DC
- 13
- 207095 , THE HONORABLE JULI E H. KOCUREK, JUDGE PRES IDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM Appellant’s brief on appeal was originally due April 5, 2018. On counsel’s
motions , the time for filing was extended to July 5, 2018 . Appellant’s counsel has now filed a
third motion, requesting that the Court extend the t ime for filing appellant’s brief. We grant the motion for extension of time and order appellant to file a brief no later than August 20, 2018. No further extension of time will be granted and failure to comply with this order will result in the
referral of this case to the trial court for a hearing under Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
It is ordered on July 9, 2018.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland
Do Not Publish
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lawrence Financial Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"report), I, Jack Blair, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       1. The report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                 /s/ Jack Blair
                             -----------------------
                             Chief Executive Officer
                                   Jack Blair
                                  May 11, 2004




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                       26
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 165 (Tuesday, August 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45236-45237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22625]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


National Defense Panel Meeting

AGENCY: DoD, National Defense Panel.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and summary agenda for the 
meeting of the National Defense Panel of September 4 and 5, 1997. In 
accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
Public Law No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1982)), it has 
been determined that this National Defense Panel meeting concerns 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1982), and that accordingly this 
meeting will be closed to the public from 0830-1700, August 18 and 19, 
1997 in order for the Panel to discuss classified material.

DATES: September 4 and 5, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Suite 532, 1931 Jefferson Davis Hwy, Arlington, Va.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The National Defense Panel was established on January 14, 1997 in 
accordance with the Military Force Structure Review Act of 1996, Pub. 
L. 104-201. The mission of the National Defense Panel is to provide the 
Secretary of Defense and Congress with an independent, non-partisan 
assessment of the Secretary's Quadrennial Defense Review and an 
Alternative Force Structure Analysis. This analysis will explore 
innovative ways to meet the national security challenges of the twenty-
first century.

Proposed Schedule and Agenda

    The National Defense Panel will meet in closed session from 0830-
1700 on September 4 and from 0830-1700 on September 5, 1997. During the 
closed session on September 4 the Panel will meet with General Paul 
Gorman, former Army General and expert on military affairs at the 
Crystal Mall 3 office. On September 5 during the closed session the 
National Defense Panel staff will present updates on issue papers, 
force structure and the Reserves at the Crystal Mall 3 office.

[[Page 45237]]

    The determination to close the meeting is based on the 
consideration that it is expected that discussion will involve 
classified matters of national security concern throughout.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please contact the National Defense 
Panel at (703) 602-4175/6.

    Dated: August 19, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-22625 Filed 8-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
Exhibit 99.1




                   RONSON AND STEEL PARTNERS JOINTLY ANNOUNCE
                          RESOLUTION OF ALL LITIGATION

Somerset, N.J., October 16, 2007 - Ronson Corporation (NASDAQ Capital Market:
RONC) Ronson Corporation and Steel Partners II, L.P., announce the proposed
resolution of all litigation between them, including all claims between Steel
Partners and present and former directors and officers of Ronson.

The settlement, which is subject to approval by the New Jersey Superior Court,
will bring to a conclusion almost 4-1/2 years of judicial disputes. The primary
matter being settled comprises a derivative shareholder suit by Steel Partners,
a 9.9% shareholder, claiming breach of fiduciary duty by Ronson directors in
various respects. The directors have vigorously defended the claims, which were
scheduled for trial in September. The settlement specifies that there is no
admission of liability by any of the defendants. Certain Ronson structural
changes and commitments have been made in the settlement, including Ronson's
commitment to allow its Shareholder Rights Agreement ("poison pill") to expire
no later than September, 2011. The settlement also includes a standstill by
Steel Partners, refraining from proxy activities and other matters for a period
of time.

In addition to disposition of the New Jersey Superior Court lawsuit, the
settlement will include the dismissal by Steel Partners of a separate action
that it instituted in its own name, not derivatively, in Federal Court in New
Jersey in 2005.

The details of the Settlement are available on Ronson's website,
www.ronsoncorp.com, and are also available through the filing by Ronson of a
------------------
Form 8-K, with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which is available
at the SEC's website, www.sec.gov.
                      -----------

Warren Lichtenstein, principal spokesman for Steel Partners, and Louis V.
Aronson II, President and CEO of Ronson, each expressed satisfaction that the
lengthy dispute was being resolved and that Ronson and its officers, directors,
and employees could devote their full time and attention to overseeing the
operations of the Company for the benefit of all shareholders.

This press release contains forward-looking statements that anticipate results
based on management's plans and expectations that are subject to uncertainty.
Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations of future events.
The Company cannot ensure that any forward-looking statement will be accurate,
although the Company believes that it has been reasonable in its expectations
and assumptions. If underlying assumptions prove inaccurate or that unknown
risks or uncertainties materialize, actual results could vary materially from
our projections. Investors should understand that it is not possible to predict
or identify all such factors and should not consider this to be a complete
statement of all potential risks and uncertainties. The Company assumes no
obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of future events
or developments.
#### Rayburn FREDERICK v. Patricia A. FREDERICK.

No. 49998.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 28, 1977.

Carnathan & Davidson, Gary L. Carna-than, Tupelo, for appellant.

Mitchell, Rogers, Eskridge, Voge & Clayton, Dennis W. Voge, Tupelo, for appellee.

Before SMITH, P. J., and BROOM and LEE, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23299]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

Open Meeting for Representatives of Health Professional 
Organizations

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an open 
meeting with representatives of health professional organizations. The 
meeting will be chaired by Sharon Smith Holston, Deputy Commissioner 
for External Affairs. This meeting will provide participants an 
opportunity to hear a discussion on the Food Safety Initiative and 
reducing food-borne illness.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, October 6, 1997, from 1:30 
p.m. to 3:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Bethesda Holiday Inn, 8210 
Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD. Interested persons may register with 
Betty Palsgrove at 301-443-1652. Registrations also may be transmitted 
by FAX to 1-800-344-3332 or 301-443-2446.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter H. Rheinstein, Office of Health 
Affairs (HFY-40), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-5470.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting is to provide an 
opportunity for representatives of health professional organizations 
and other interested persons to be briefed by senior FDA staff as well 
as representatives from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
(CDC), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the Environmental 
Protection Agency (EPA). It will also provide an opportunity for 
informal discussion on the role of the Federal Government and health 
professional organizations in reducing food-borne illness in general, 
as well as identifying and treating the illness in patients.
    This public meeting is free of charge; however, space is limited. 
Registration for the meeting will be accepted in the order received and 
should be sent to the contact person listed above. Registration should 
include the name and title of the person attending and the name of the 
organization being represented, if any.

    Dated: August 27, 1997.
William B. Schultz,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 97-23299 Filed 9-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
```
#### Richard F. MINZEY and Jo Ann Minzey, his wife, Appellants, v. Amy SHAPIRO, Appellee.

No. 76-372.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 17, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 15, 1977.

Kathleen B. Johnson of Law Offices of Norman F. Solomon, Miami, for appellants.

Arnold R. Ginsberg of Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, and H. Lawrence Asher, Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We find that there is a genuine issue of material fact concerning the affirmative defense of usury raised by the appellants, Richard F. Minzey and Jo Ann Minzey, precluding the entry of summary judgment. Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

ALDERMAN, ANSTEAD and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.