# Testing for Hydrochloric Acid Gas Emissions By EPA Method 321

CALIFORNIA PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY MOJAVE, CA

APRIL 2010

Submitted by: Emission Monitoring Inc. 8901 Glenwood Ave.

Raleigh, NC 27617

Submitted to:

CALPORTLAND INC 9350 OAK CREEK ROAD MOJAVE, CA 93501

## ii 

# TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

1. Introduction 1 1.1 Summary of Test Program 1.2 Test Program Organization 2.0 Source Description 4 2.1 Process Description 2.2 Control Equipment Description 3.0 Test Program 4 3.1 Objectives 4.0 Sample Locations 5 4.1 Flue Gas Sampling Location 5.0 Samp ling and Analytical Procedures 6 5.1 Test Methods 6.0 Internal QA/QC Activities 8 6.1 QC Procedures 6.2 QA Procedures 6.3 QA/QC Checks for Data Reduction and Validation

TABLES

Table 1.2 Test Program Organization 1 Table 2.1 EPA Reporting Spreadsheet 3 Table 4.1 Test Location Data 5 Table 6.1 Method 321 QA Procedures 8

FIGURES

Figure 4.1 Kiln #3 Exhaust Stack Sampling Location 6

APPENDIX A METHOD 320/321 REPORT APPENDIX B METHOD 3A DAT A FOR OXYGEN APPENDIX C METHOD 1 & 2 DATA FOR FLOW RATE

## 1 

# 1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Summary of Test Program

CalPortland conduct ed emissions testing for hydrochloric acid gas (HCl) at the Mojave, CA facility in order to satisfy the EPA Section 114 request (under th e CAA) dated February 3, 2010. Raw mill on and off testing was completed on March 30 and 31, 2010.

The test methods were specified Section 1.2 and Table 1.2 of Enclosure 2 attached to th e EPA 114 request (revision 2

- 20

- 2010). A summary of the test program is presented below.

Test Method Test Runs and Duration Target Analyte Process Condition Method 320 3

– 1 hr Effluent Moisture & CO 2 

## Raw Mill On 3

– 1 hr Raw Mill Off Method 321 3

– 1 hr Hydrochloric Acid Gas (HCl) Raw Mill On 3

– 1 hr Raw Mill Off Method 3A 3

– 1 hr Effluent Oxygen Raw Mill On 3

– 1 hr Raw Mill Off Methods 1 & 2 Before/During M321 Runs Effluent Velocity Raw Mill On

Raw Mill Off

The table below presents the testing program organization.

1.2 The Table below identifies the test program organization.

Personnel Title Contact Information Test Program Responsibilities Jay Grady Cooperate Environmental Manager 626.852.6262 jgrady@calportland.com CalPortland Corporate Contact

Mike Kirby Facility Environmental Manager 661.824.2401 mkirby@calportland.com Mojave Plant Environmental Contact Phil Kauppi FTIR Operator 989.772.5088 p.kauppi@pati

- air.com Tester FTIR Operator and

Methods 1 and 2 Assistance Laura Kinner Ph.D. Consultant 919.781.3824 lkinner@emissionmonitoring.com Test Program Coordinator Methods 1

- 3A

## 2 Raw mill on testing was completed without incident. Immediately following Run 1 of mill off testing, the facility experienced a power failure due to high wind conditions. This resulted in a loss of feed to the system and non

- representative operation for testing purposes. A period of about 5 hours was required to re

- establish feed and combustion conditions so that testing could

re sume. Results for mill off operation were collected under representative conditions, however, flow rates were observed to be more variable than if the system had not experienced power failure.

Results from this test program are summarized in the spreadsh eet provided by EPA and included herein as Table 1.2.

Appendix A presents the entire Method 321/320 report for HCl, CO 2 

## and moisture, Appendix B presents the Method 3A data for oxygen , and Appendix C presents the effluent velocity data and volumetric flowrate calculation results.TABLE 1.2 EPA REPORTING SPREADSHEETCompany Name:Facility Name:Mojave FacilityAddress:9350 Oak Creek Rd Mojave CA 93501City:Mojave FacilityState:CaliforniaKiln ID:Kiln Type:Pre-Heater/ Pre-CalcinerIn-line Raw Mill:YesControl Device Configuration:Parameter Sample #1 Sample #2 Sample #3 Avg.UnitsTest Method UsedTest LocationNoteEPA InstructionsSelect appropriate unitfrom list. If other isselected please describeunits in column H at right. Enter the name of the Test Method used.Indicate whether the testoccurred upstream ordownstream of a controldevice(s); list the controldevice(s)If kiln has an in-line raw mill,indicate raw mill status during tests(i.e., raw mill on or raw mill off).Provide any other informationsupporting information you think isnecessary about this test report.Sample Date (mm/dd/yyyy)3/30/2010 3/30/2010 3/30/2010HCl Concentration - as measured - Wet Basis6.36.3 5.8 6.1ppmv WetM321 Downstream of Baghouse Raw Mill OnHCl Concentration Dry Basis6.9 6.9 6.3 6.7ppm v DryM321 Downstream of BaghouseOxygen Concentration - dry basis12.42 12.07 11.92 12.1 %M3ADownstream of BaghouseCO2 Concentration - dry basis19.119.1 19.1 19.1 %M3ADownstream of BaghouseHCl Concentration - dry corrected to 7% oxygen11.210.8 9.8 10.6ppm v dryat 7% O2M321 Downstream of BaghouseExhaust Stream %Moisture8.28.2 8.2 8.2 %M320Downstream of BaghouseExhaust Flowrate259,488 259,249 253,513 257,417 dscfmM1, 2, 3A, 320Downstream of BaghouseExhaust Temperature219230 230226 FT/CDownstream of BaghouseSample Date(mm/dd/yyyy)3/31/2010 3/31/2010 3/31/2010HCl Concentration - as measured - Wet Basis57.366.8 68.1 64.1ppmv WetM321 Downstream of Baghouse Raw Mill OffHCl Concentration Dry Basis59.9 69.9 71.0 67.0ppm v DryM321 Downstream of BaghouseOxygen Concentration - dry basis12.311.9 10.56 11.6 %M3ADownstream of BaghouseCO2 Concentration - dry basis21.716.7 19.7 19.3 %M3ADownstream of BaghouseHCl Concentration - dry corrected to 7% oxygen96.9 108.0 95.5 100.1ppm v dryat 7% O2M321 Downstream of BaghouseExhaust Stream %Moisture4.44.5 4.1 4.3 %M320Downstream of BaghouseExhaust Flowrate218,776 200,306 214,974 211,352 dscfmM1, 2, 3A, 320Downstream of BaghouseExhaust Temperature354411 410392 FT/CDownstream of BaghouseNotes:California Portland Cement Co.Kiln 1BaghouseEnter HCl concentration value in dry partsper million volume (ppmvd) corrected to 7%oxygen. If the test results are below detectionlimit, please note the detection limit inbrackets(e.g., [< 0.010]).Method 320 data used for moisture and CO2 results reporting.3

## 4 2.0 SOURCE DESCRIPTION

CalPortland Company operates a coal/coke fired (natural gas backup) pre

- heater/pre

- calciner cement kiln system with an in

- line raw mill at its Mojave, CA facility. The kiln is rated for 1.5 milli on tons per year clinker. Emissions are controlled by a fabric filter baghouse.

The Mojave facility is permitted to operate by the State of California under the Title

- V Operating Permit Number 1003

- V

- 2000, PSD Permit # 78

- 73 and Kern County APCD PTO # 1 003026M.

The physical address of the plant is: 9350 Oak Creek Road Mojave, CA 93501

2.1 Process Description

Crushed and sized limestone feed and other raw materials are ground and mixed in the in

- line raw mill system and fed into the preheater tower. The raw materials travel countercurrent to the process gases through the tower and are partially calcined before entering the rotary kiln.

Fuels combusted in the pre

- calciner and rotary kiln are comprised of coal, coke or natural gas. Fuel cons umption approximates 3.2 Million BTU/short ton of clinker.

2.2 Control Equipment Description (H

- 5

- 6

- DC1)

The pyroprocessing system is equipped with a 24 compartment dry fabric baghouse. The assembly contains 72 bags per module (1,728 total) and is sized for 400 to 440,000 ACFM

.
Kiln exhaust gas enters each the baghouse at a temperature of about 230

- 250 F. The cleaned gas passes through the single induced draft fan to an ID fan and attached 338 foot tall stack.



# 3.0 TEST PROGRAM

3.1 Test Program Objectives

The objective of this test program wa s to collect valid HCl, O 2 

## , and moisture at the facility in order to report concentration levels of HCl corrected to a dry basis and 7% ox ygen for both raw mill on and off operation. Effluent velocity and C O 2 

## data were also collected so that effluent volumetric flowrates could be reported as requested by EPA.

## 5 

# 4.0 SAMPLING LOCATION

The Kiln exhaust stack has four test ports (referred to as A

- D ) located 90 **°** apart. General effluent conditions at the kiln stack are provided in Table 4

- 1 . A d igital image of the test location is shown in Figure 4

- 1

.

Table 4

- 1 . Kiln # 3 Test Location Data

Test Location Data Measurement
Stack diameter 126.5 inches Distance from sampling ports to upstream flow disturbances >8 diameters

Distance from sampling ports to downstream flow disturbances >2 diameters

Stack temperature ** 22 0 **°** F

- 4 50 **°** F Flue gas flow rate, DSCFM ** 200,000

- 260,000 Flue gas moisture, percent * 4

– 1 0 % Oxygen content, percent 10

– 1 4% Carbon dioxide content, percent ** 15

- 22%

* Depending on water spray for temperature control at baghouse inlet

* * Depending on raw mill status

4.1 Flue Gas Sampling Locations

The Method 321/320/3A gas sampling probe was placed near the third velocity traverse point in Port C

. The probe was removed during velocity traverses of this port. This sampling location

met EPA Method 1 criteria for distance from the nearest flow disturban ces and was fo und to be free of cyclonic flow having a <10 0 overall avera ge angle.

## 6 Figure 4

- 1 Stack Sampling Location



# 5.0 TEST METHODS

5.1 Sampling Point Determination

– EPA Method 1

The stack dimension was 126.5 inches ID and the number and location of the sampling and traverse points used are outlined in U.S. EPA Reference Method 1.

5.2 Flue Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate

- EPA Method 2

The flue gas velocity and volumetric flow rate during testing was determined according to the procedures outlined in U.S. EPA Reference Method 2

. Velocity measurements were made using an S

- type Pitot tube conforming to the geometric specifications outlined in Method 2 and assigned a coefficient of 0.84

. E ffluent gas temperatures were measured w ith chromel

- alumel thermocouple attac hed to digital rea dout

.

## 7 5.3 Flue Gas Composition and Molecular Weight

- EPA Method 3 A

Flue gas analyses and calculation of oxygen concentrations was performed in accordance with EPA Method 3 A

. The O 2 

## analyzer accepted sample post FTIR and shared the same sample extraction system . The oxygen analyzer received a dry sample as a conditioning unit was located upstream of the analyzer

– post FTIR

. Method 320 was used to provide CO 2 

## concentrations on a wet basis. Method 320 was used to provide a moisture result so that CO 2 

## , and HCl results could be converted to a dry basis.

5.5 Method 321/320

– Hydrochloric Acid Gas and Moisture

FT

- IR data were collected using an On

- Line Technolo gies Multi

- Gas 2010 FT

- IR spectrometer.

A 4 ft., heated, 3/8 inch stainless steel probe, maintained at 180 **°** C, was used to direct effluent gas from the stack to the FT

- IR. A heated box, maintained at 180 **°** C, containing the connection from the probe to th e filter assembly, and to a 5 0 ft. heated, 3/8 inch transfer line was used for sample extraction on a hot and wet basis. The heated line was maintained at 180 **°** C and all connecting fittings were insulated to prevent moisture condensation. A 0.1 **μ** glass fil ter was used for particulate matter removal.

All calibrations and spikes were delivered through the primary particulate matter filter.

T he FTIR measurement system sample d effluent at a constant rate of greater than 10 lpm from a single point withi n the stack.

The FT

- IR uses a temperature

- controlled, 20.1meter multipass gas cell maintained at 180 **°** C. Gas flows and sampling system pressures were monitored using a rotometer and pressure transducer. All data were collected at 0.5cm - 1 

## resolution. Each s pectrum was derived from the co addition of at least 64 scans.

Data for HCl and moisture were collected continuously for each test, with a new data point generated about every seventy

- two seconds.

The minimum detectable concentration (MDC) of HCl for this measurement system and analytical algorithm was determined to be 0.2 ppm (v) wet based on analyzing water vapor spectra in the 5

- 10% range absent any HCl. The standard deviation of the results multiplied by 3 was used in assigning the value for MDC. See ASTM D6348 for this procedure.

## 8 6.0 QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES

6.1 Quality Control Procedures

The test method s employed in this program provide d resu lts on

- site. No samples were generated for analyses by an off

- site laboratory.

The quality control measures for the FTIR measurement system consist ed of: 1) ensuring that the temperature of the FTIR measurement cell, he ated sample lines and probes were at 350oF or above, 2) ensuri ng that all connections between the probe, h eated line and FTIR analyzer were insulated to prevent moisture condensation , 3) ensuring that the pump had adequate capacity for the application, and 4) refining the analytical program prior to testing.

T he ele vated temperature and high relative flow rate through the measurement system minimize s the HCl reactions and decrease measurement system passivation time.

Ambient air was sampled before the start of testing to ensure that a stable “zero” reading is achi eved for HCl (g). This procedure was also conducted post test to ensure sample lines are ready for subsequent testing programs.

Direct calibrations with the calibration transfer standard ( ~100 ppm ethy lene) and the HCl spike gases (~ 2 00 ppm HCl and ~ 50 ppm HCl both with ~ 4 ppm SF 6 

## ) were performed before beginning testing to ensure a leak free system and system passivation for HCl.

For EPA Method 3A all zero, upscale and mid

- point checks were conducted according to the method. Results provided were corrected for drift before using as the basis for correcting the HCl concentration results to 7% oxygen.

6.2 Quality Assurance procedures

The FTIR measurement system was challenged by conducting an ambient ai r zero, analyzing a CTS gas, analyzing HCl cal ibration gases and conducting HCl analyte spikes. Analyte spiking was conducted according to the procedures in Method 321. Namely, the resultant spike plus native concentration level approximated 2 times the actual native level, and the spike was ≤ 0.1

o f the total sample flow rate. All calibration and spike gases were delivered upstream of the particulate matter filter.

Table 6

- 1 Method 321 QA

SPECTRAL FILES TO COLLECT PURPOSE Background Optical “zero” CTS

– Direct FTIR Analyzer Check

– 100 ppm ethylene CTS

– System FTIR Measurement System Check and Leak Check HCl

– Direct Cal Passivate system, determine direct value of cylinder HCl and SF 6

## 9 Effluent Baseline HCl Background Concentration Analyte Spike #1 QA Check of Entire Measurement System Run 1 Effluent Data

– 1 hr run Analyte Spike #2 QA Check of Entire Measurement System Run 2 Effluent Data

– 1hr run Analyte Spike #3 QA Check of Entire Measurement System Run 3 Effluent Data

– 1 hr run Post Test Analyte Spike QA Check of Entire Measurement System Post Test CTS Final Check of Analyzer

All calibrations and calibration checks required by Method 3A were conducted in the field and adherence to the method criteria were verified while on

- site.

6.3 QA/QC Checks for Data Reduction and Validation

Method 321 /320 is considered a “self validating” method because the analyte spiking procedure conducted in the field determines the accuracy of the entire measurement system for that particular flue gas matrix. Spikes for mill on were cond ucted using the ~50 ppm cylinder and spikes for mill off were conducted using the ~200 ppm cylinder so that resultant concentrations would be representative of the effluent concentration.

Analyte spike recoveries were calculated in the field and all res ults were well within the method acceptance criteria.

6.4 Sample Identification

Every Me thod 321 sample spectrum was identified with a unique file name

.
All Method 3A sample runs had a unique identification number and all records of zero and calibrati on checks were documented.

## 10 APPENDIX A
METHOD 320/321 REPORT FROM PRISM ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES

### 1200 N. Fancher

· Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 · (989) 772-5088 · Fax (989) 772-5870 

# Cal Portland Mojave, California

Emission Testing

March 30 - 31, 2010

Pro j ect No. 1663



# Prepared For

Emission Monitoring, Inc.

By

Phillip J. Kauppi Chemist / FTIR Specialist

April 16, 2010

# Cal Portland Mojave, California – Emission Testing March 30 - 31, 2010 Project No. 1663



# Scope

Prism Analytical Technologies, Inc. (PATI) was c ontracted by Emission M onitoring, Inc. (EMI) to conduct air emission testing at the Cal Portland Ce ment Plant, Mojave, Ca lifornia. Testing was performed March 30 - 31, 2010 to determine the concen trations of gaseous hydrogen chloride (HCl), carbon dioxide (CO 2 

## ) and water (H 2 

## O) from the Main Stack while opera ting with and without the in-line raw mill.

Extractive Fourier transform in frared (FTIR) spectrometry following US EPA Method 321 was performed to quantify the concentr ation levels of gaseous emissions from the Main Stack. Phillip Kauppi, PATI, performed FTIR data collecti on, data reduction and report generation.



# Procedures

FTIR data were collected using an MKS MultiGas 2030 FTIR spectrometer, serial # 016252291. A heated, 8 ft., 3/8 inch diameter, stai nless steel probe, maintained at 191 ° C, was used to direct effluent gas from the Main Stack to the FTIR. A heated filter box (191 ° C) contained the connection from the probe to the filter assembly to a 50 ft., h eated, 3/8 inch, Teflon transfer line. A 0.1 μ glass filter was used for particulate matter removal.

The heated transfer line, held at 191 ° C, connected the probe/filter assemb ly to the FTIR. The FTIR was equipped with a temperature-controlled, 5.11 meter multipass gas cell maintained at 191 ° C. Gas flows and sampling system pressures were monitored using a rotometer and pressure transducer. All data were collected at 0.5cm -1 

## resolution. Each spectrum was derived fro m the coaddition of 60 scans, with a new data point generated every one minute.

A calibration transfer standard (CTS), 100.0 ppm ethylen e standard, was analyzed daily before and after testing. The concentration determined for all CTS runs were within ± 5% of th e certified value of the standard. The ethylene was passed through the entire system (system purge) to determine the sampling system response time and to ensure that the sampli ng system was leak-free at the stack location.

Nitrogen was purged through the sampli ng system before and after tes ting to confirm the system was free of contaminants.

Direct FTIR measurements of two HCl/SF 6 

## gas standards and the ethylene gas standard were made to confirm concentrations. The certifi ed concentrations of the high HC l standard were 206.5 ppm HCl and 4.11 ppm SF 6 

## . The determined cylinder concentration of HCl and SF 6 

## were 181.1 ppm and 3.88 ppm, respectively. The certified concentrations of low HCl standard were 49.56 ppm HCl and 4.12 ppm SF 6


## .

### prism analytical technologies, inc. Cal Portland, Mojave, CA - Emission Testing, March 30 - 31, 2010 Project No. 1663

page 2 

## The determined cylinder concentration of HCl and SF 6 

## were 49.5 ppm and 3.80 ppm, respectively. The determined cylinder concentrations were the va lues used for all recovery calculations.

HCl/SF 6 

## standards were passed through the sampling system to determine the response time and confirm recovery. See the Main Stack FTIR QA/QC Data Appendix for results.

HCl spiking was performed before and after each test run at the Main St ack to verify the ability of the sampling system to quantitatively deliver a sample c ontaining HCl from the ba se of the probe to the FTIR. Analyte spiking assures the ab ility of the FTIR to quantify HCl in the presence of effluent gas.

Stack samples were measured to determine the native HC l concentration to be used in the spike recovery calculations. The analyte spiking gas contained a low concentration of sulfur hexafluoride (SF 6 

## )

. 

## The determined SF 6 

## concentration in the spiked sample was used to calculate the dilution factor of the spike and thus used to calculate the concentration of the spiked HCl. The following equation illustrates the percent recovery calculation.

ܨܦ ൌ ௌி଺ሺ௦௣௞ሻ ௌி଺ሺௗ௜௥ሻ 

## (Sec. 9.2.3 (3) USEPA Method 320)

ܥܵ ൌ ܨܦ כ ܵ݌݅݇݁ ሺ ݀݅ݎ ሻ ൅ ܷ݊݌ݏ݅݇݁ሺ1 െ ܨܦሻ (Sec. 9.2.3 (4) USEPA Method 320)

Due to the elevated native HCl con centrations of the Main Stack while operating with the raw mill off, the following calculation was used, which compares the calculated amount of HCl spiked into the system to the additional measured HCl m in the spiked sa ple.



## ݅݇݁݌ܵ כ ܨܦ ൌ ݅݇݁݀݌ܵ ݈ܥܪ ሺ ݎ݀݅ ሻ

ሻܨܦ െ 1ሺ݅݇݁݌ݏܷ݊ െ ݈݁݌ܵܽ݉ ݅݇݁݀݌ܵ ൌ ݈ܥܪ ∆

ൌ ݕݎ݁ݒ݋ܴ݁ܿ % ݈ܥܪ∆ ݅݇݁݌ܵ ݈ܥܪ

DF = Dilution factor of the spike gas SF 6(dir) 

### = SF 6 

### concentration measured directly in undiluted spike gas SF 6(spk) 

### = Diluted SF 6 

### concentration measured in a spiked sample Spike ( dir) 

### = Concentration of the analyte in the spik e standard measure by the FTIR directly CS = Expected concentra tion of the spiked samples Unspike = Native concentration of analytes in unspiked samples HCl Spiked = Concentration of HCl spiked into the sample during analyte spiking
Δ HCl = Difference between spiked sample and unspiked sample

### prism analytical technologies, inc. Cal Portland, Mojave, CA - Emission Testing, March 30 - 31, 2010 Project No. 1663

page 3 

## All analyte spikes were introduced using an instrument grade stainless steel rotometer. The spike target dilution ratio was 1:10 or less. All HCl spike recoveries were within the EPA Method 321 allowance of ±30%. See Analyte Spike Su mmary Appendix for results.

As part of the data validation pro cedure, reference spectra are manually fit to that of the sample spectra and a concentration is determined. The reference spect ra are scaled to match the peak amplitude of the sample, thus providing a scale factor. The scale fa ctor multiplied by the reference spectra concentration is used to determine the concentration value for th e sample spectra. Sample pressure and temperature corrections are then applie d to compute the final sample concentr ation. The manually calculated results are then compared with the software-generated re sults. The data is then validated if the two concentrations are within ± 5% agreement. If ther e is a difference greater th an ± 5% the spectra are reviewed for possible spectra interf erences or any other possible causes leading to misquantified data.



# Results and Discussion

Detection Limits

The detection limit of each analyte was calcu lated following Annex A2 of ASTM D6348-3 procedure using spectra that cont ained similar amounts of moisture.

Table 1 - FTIR Detection Limits

Analyte HCl (ppmv wet) CO 2 

### (%v) H 2 

### O (%v)

Det. Lim. 0.2 0.01 0.01



# Results and Discussion

The Main Stack – Raw Mill On

Three, 1-hour test runs were performed on The Main Stack while operating the in-line raw mill on March 30, 2010 (See Table 2 on following page fo r Test Run detail). Hydrogen chloride, CO 2 

## , and H 2 

## O was detected during the three test ru ns. Analyte spiking was performed before and after each test run to confirm the measurement system’s ability to de liver and quantify HCl (See Analyte Spike Summary Appendix for results). The HCl and CO 2 

## concentration data were calcu lated on a wet volume basis.

The sample and data collection followed the pro cedures outlined in USEPA Method 321 and PATI’s SOP 207. See the Main Stack FTIR Test Run Da ta appendix for all concentration data.

### prism analytical technologies, inc. Cal Portland, Mojave, CA - Emission Testing, March 30 - 31, 2010 Project No. 1663

page 4 

## Table 2. – Summary of FTIR Data, Main Stack – Raw Mill On

Run 1, 10:30

– 11:30 3/30/2010 HCl (ppmv wet) CO 2 

### (%v wet) H 2 

### O (%v)
Minimum 5.3 17.2 8.0


### Maximum 6.9 17.8 8.3 

### Average 6.3 17.5 8.2



### Run 2, 12:06

– 13:06 3/30/2010 HCl (ppmv wet) CO 2 

### (%v wet) H 2 

### O (%v)
Minimum 5.3 17.2 8.0


### Maximum 6.9 17.8 8.3 

### Average 6.3 17.5 8.2



### Run 3, 13:40

– 14:40 3/30/2010 HCl (ppmv wet) CO 2 

### (%v wet) H 2 

### O (%v)
Minimum 5.0 17.3 8.0


### Maximum 6.3 18.0 8.4 

### Average 5.8 17.5 8.2



## The Main Stack – Raw Mill Off

Three, 1-hour test runs were performed on The Main Stack while operating the in-line raw mill off March 31, 2010 (See Table 3 on for Test Run detail). Hydrogen chloride, CO 2 

## , and H 2 

## O was detected during the three test runs. Analyte spiking was perfo rmed before and after each test run to confirm the measurement system’s ability to deliver and qua ntify HCl (See Analyte Spike Summary Appendix for results). The HCl and CO 2 

## concentration data were calculated on a wet volume basis.

The sample and data collection followed the pro cedures outlined in USEPA Method 321 and PATI’s SOP 207. See the Main Stack FTIR Test Run Da ta appendix for all concentration data.

Table 3. – Summary of FTIR Data, Main Stack – Raw Mill Off

Run 4, 7:20

– 8:20 3/31/2010 HCl (ppmv wet) CO 2 

### (%v wet) H 2 

### O (%v)
Minimum 51.2 18.1 3.9


### Maximum 61.9 21.9 4.6 

### Average 57.3 20.7 4.4



### Run 5, 13:36

– 14:36 3/31/2010 HCl (ppmv wet) CO 2 

### (%v wet) H 2 

### O (%v)
Minimum 55.2 14.5 3.5


### Maximum 86.5 16.9 6.8 

### Average 66.8 15.9 4.5



### Run 6, 14:54

– 15:54 3/31/2010 HCl (ppmv wet) CO 2 

### (%v wet) H 2 

### O (%v)
Minimum 63.8 17.8 3.9


### Maximum 72.7 20.1 4.3 

### Average 68.1 18.9 4.1

### prism analytical technologies, inc. Cal Portland, Mojave, CA - Emission Testing, March 30 - 31, 2010 Project No. 1663

page 5 

## The following appendices include FTIR data and QA/QC procedures:

- The Main Stack, Raw Mill On – FTIR Test Run Data

- The Main Stack, Raw Mill Off – FTIR Test Run Data

- The Main Stack FTIR QA/QC Data

- Analyte Spike Summary

- Gas Certificates and Field Notes

- US EPA Method 321 Calculations

Phillip J. Kauppi (electronic) ________ Date: April 16, 2010 Phillip J. Kauppi Chemist / FTIR Specialist

CalPortland_Mojave_1663.doc

# APPENDIX

Main Stack – Raw Mill On FTIR Test Run Data

### Cal Portland Cement Company, Mojave, CA ‐ Test Run #1 ‐ FTIR Data

FTIR Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) FTIR Gas Cell Temp (C) FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm) MILL_ON_R1_000265.LAB 3/30/2010 10:30:00 5.6 17.47 9.55 191.31 0.812 MILL_ON_R1_000266.LAB 3/30/2010 10:30:31 5.3 17.40 9.58 191.31 0.812 MILL_ON_R1_000267.LAB 3/30/2010 10:31:02 5.1 17.41 9.50 191.32 0.812 MILL_ON_R1_000268.LAB 3/30/2010 10:32:31 4.8 17.42 9.60 191.33 0.813 MILL_ON_R1_000269.LAB 3/30/2010 10:33:29 4.6 17.48 9.63 191.34 0.813 MILL_ON_R1_000270.LAB 3/30/2010 10:34:28 4.4 17.43 9.63 191.35 0.813 MILL_ON_R1_000271.LAB 3/30/2010 10:35:27 4.4 17.26 9.53 191.34 0.813 MILL_ON_R1_000272.LAB 3/30/2010 10:36:26 4.2 17.33 9.55 191.35 0.814 MILL_ON_R1_000273.LAB 3/30/2010 10:37:25 4.1 17.26 9.51 191.35 0.815 MILL_ON_R1_000274.LAB 3/30/2010 10:38:23 4.2 17.33 9.52 191.35 0.813 MILL_ON_R1_000275.LAB 3/30/2010 10:39:22 4.1 17.45 9.51 191.36 0.813 MILL_ON_R1_000276.LAB 3/30/2010 10:40:21 4.0 17.41 9.45 191.38 0.814 MILL_ON_R1_000277.LAB 3/30/2010 10:41:20 4.0 17.18 9.37 191.37 0.813 MILL_ON_R1_000278.LAB 3/30/2010 10:42:18 3.9 17.18 9.39 191.34 0.814 MILL_ON_R1_000279.LAB 3/30/2010 10:43:17 3.9 17.18 9.34 191.35 0.815 MILL_ON_R1_000280.LAB 3/30/2010 10:44:16 3.9 17.23 9.38 191.34 0.814 MILL_ON_R1_000281.LAB 3/30/2010 10:45:15 4.0 17.35 9.36 191.35 0.815 MILL_ON_R1_000282.LAB 3/30/2010 10:46:14 4.0 17.35 9.32 191.35 0.815 MILL_ON_R1_000283.LAB 3/30/2010 10:47:12 4.0 17.16 9.22 191.35 0.815 MILL_ON_R1_000284.LAB 3/30/2010 10:48:11 4.0 17.32 9.21 191.34 0.815 MILL_ON_R1_000285.LAB 3/30/2010 10:49:10 4.1 17.09 9.19 191.32 0.815 MILL_ON_R1_000286.LAB 3/30/2010 10:50:09 4.1 17.23 9.20 191.31 0.814 MILL_ON_R1_000287.LAB 3/30/2010 10:51:07 4.1 17.09 9.14 191.31 0.814 MILL_ON_R1_000288.LAB 3/30/2010 10:52:06 4.2 17.37 9.16 191.32 0.815 MILL_ON_R1_000289.LAB 3/30/2010 10:53:05 4.3 17.15 9.07 191.30 0.816 MILL_ON_R1_000290.LAB 3/30/2010 10:54:04 4.5 17.13 9.10 191.31 0.814 MILL_ON_R1_000291.LAB 3/30/2010 10:55:03 4.7 17.21 9.04 191.32 0.814 MILL_ON_R1_000292.LAB 3/30/2010 10:56:01 4.8 17.34 9.05 191.33 0.814

MILL ON R1 000293 LAB 3/30/2010 10:57:00 4 9 17 23 9 03 191 32 0 813 MILL

_ ON

_ R1

_ 000293

. LAB 3/30/2010 10:57:00

. . . . . MILL_ON_R1_000294.LAB 3/30/2010 10:57:59 4.9 17.26 9.04 191.31 0.814 MILL_ON_R1_000295.LAB 3/30/2010 10:58:58 5.0 17.10 8.94 191.33 0.814 MILL_ON_R1_000296.LAB 3/30/2010 10:59:56 5.2 17.37 8.96 191.35 0.814 MILL_ON_R1_000297.LAB 3/30/2010 11:00:55 5.4 17.34 8.95 191.36 0.813 MILL_ON_R1_000298.LAB 3/30/2010 11:01:54 5.4 17.17 8.89 191.36 0.814 MILL_ON_R1_000299.LAB 3/30/2010 11:02:53 5.4 17.12 8.85 191.33 0.814 MILL_ON_R1_000300.LAB 3/30/2010 11:03:52 5.4 17.33 8.90 191.32 0.813 MILL_ON_R1_000301.LAB 3/30/2010 11:04:50 5.5 17.14 8.77 191.33 0.815 MILL_ON_R1_000302.LAB 3/30/2010 11:05:49 5.3 17.09 8.80 191.32 0.816 MILL_ON_R1_000303.LAB 3/30/2010 11:06:48 5.2 17.07 8.77 191.36 0.814 MILL_ON_R1_000304.LAB 3/30/2010 11:07:47 5.4 17.15 8.70 191.34 0.813 MILL_ON_R1_000305.LAB 3/30/2010 11:08:45 5.4 17.18 8.72 191.35 0.813 MILL_ON_R1_000306.LAB 3/30/2010 11:09:44 5.4 17.20 8.76 191.33 0.814 MILL_ON_R1_000307.LAB 3/30/2010 11:10:43 5.5 16.92 8.63 191.32 0.814 MILL_ON_R1_000308.LAB 3/30/2010 11:11:42 5.6 17.14 8.72 191.33 0.814 MILL_ON_R1_000309.LAB 3/30/2010 11:12:41 5.6 17.03 8.57 191.34 0.814 MILL_ON_R1_000310.LAB 3/30/2010 11:13:39 5.6 17.06 8.56 191.33 0.815 MILL_ON_R1_000311.LAB 3/30/2010 11:14:38 5.6 17.10 8.51 191.29 0.815 MILL_ON_R1_000312.LAB 3/30/2010 11:15:37 5.8 17.31 8.54 191.29 0.814 MILL_ON_R1_000313.LAB 3/30/2010 11:16:36 5.9 17.24 8.43 191.29 0.814 MILL_ON_R1_000314.LAB 3/30/2010 11:17:35 5.8 17.34 8.43 191.33 0.815 MILL_ON_R1_000315.LAB 3/30/2010 11:18:33 5.9 17.22 8.38 191.33 0.814 MILL_ON_R1_000316.LAB 3/30/2010 11:19:32 6.0 17.21 8.41 191.32 0.813 MILL_ON_R1_000317.LAB 3/30/2010 11:20:31 5.8 17.29 8.31 191.35 0.814 MILL_ON_R1_000318.LAB 3/30/2010 11:21:30 5.9 17.22 8.34 191.35 0.815



### Prj. # 1663

### Cal Portland Cement Company, Mojave, CA ‐ Test Run #1 ‐ FTIR Data

FTIR Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) FTIR Gas Cell Temp (C) FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm) MILL_ON_R1_000319.LAB 3/30/2010 11:22:28 5.9 17.08 8.27 191.30 0.816 MILL_ON_R1_000320.LAB 3/30/2010 11:23:27 5.9 17.04 8.33 191.31 0.815 MILL_ON_R1_000321.LAB 3/30/2010 11:24:26 5.9 17.29 8.32 191.31 0.815 MILL_ON_R1_000322.LAB 3/30/2010 11:25:25 6.0 17.20 8.30 191.32 0.816 MILL_ON_R1_000323.LAB 3/30/2010 11:26:24 5.9 17.15 8.19 191.33 0.816 MILL_ON_R1_000324.LAB 3/30/2010 11:27:22 5.9 17.23 8.33 191.33 0.815 MILL_ON_R1_000325.LAB 3/30/2010 11:28:21 6.1 17.31 8.32 191.33 0.816 MILL_ON_R1_000326.LAB 3/30/2010 11:29:20 5.9 17.37 8.36 191.34 0.815 MILL_ON_R1_000327.LAB 3/30/2010 11:30:19 5.8 17.39 8.29 191.33 0.815

Minimum 3.9 16.9 8.2
Maximum 6.1 17.5 9.6 Average 5.0 17.2 8.9



### Prj. # 1663

### Cal Portland Cement Company, Mojave, CA ‐ Test Run #2 ‐ FTIR Data

FTIR Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) FTIR Gas Cell Temp (C) FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm) MILL_ON_R2_000359.LAB 3/30/2010 12:05:43 5.3 17.56 8.24 191.32 0.812 MILL_ON_R2_000360.LAB 3/30/2010 12:06:42 5.5 17.42 8.23 191.32 0.812 MILL_ON_R2_000361.LAB 3/30/2010 12:07:41 5.5 17.39 8.25 191.32 0.813 MILL_ON_R2_000362.LAB 3/30/2010 12:08:39 5.7 17.43 8.22 191.32 0.816 MILL_ON_R2_000363.LAB 3/30/2010 12:09:38 5.8 17.62 8.28 191.29 0.816 MILL_ON_R2_000364.LAB 3/30/2010 12:10:37 5.9 17.46 8.24 191.30 0.815 MILL_ON_R2_000365.LAB 3/30/2010 12:11:36 5.8 17.48 8.24 191.31 0.816 MILL_ON_R2_000366.LAB 3/30/2010 12:12:34 5.7 17.63 8.19 191.30 0.816 MILL_ON_R2_000367.LAB 3/30/2010 12:13:33 5.7 17.71 8.18 191.34 0.816 MILL_ON_R2_000368.LAB 3/30/2010 12:14:32 5.7 17.63 8.10 191.33 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000369.LAB 3/30/2010 12:15:31 5.6 17.67 8.10 191.33 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000370.LAB 3/30/2010 12:16:30 5.8 17.48 8.03 191.34 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000371.LAB 3/30/2010 12:17:28 5.8 17.78 8.01 191.35 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000372.LAB 3/30/2010 12:18:27 6.0 17.52 8.14 191.34 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000373.LAB 3/30/2010 12:19:26 5.6 17.53 8.07 191.35 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000374.LAB 3/30/2010 12:20:25 5.7 17.45 8.12 191.34 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000375.LAB 3/30/2010 12:21:24 5.8 17.45 8.12 191.31 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000376.LAB 3/30/2010 12:22:22 6.0 17.48 8.07 191.31 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000377.LAB 3/30/2010 12:23:21 6.1 17.40 8.12 191.32 0.819 MILL_ON_R2_000378.LAB 3/30/2010 12:24:20 6.1 17.41 8.17 191.32 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000379.LAB 3/30/2010 12:25:19 6.4 17.60 8.10 191.35 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000380.LAB 3/30/2010 12:26:17 6.6 17.52 8.08 191.35 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000381.LAB 3/30/2010 12:27:16 6.6 17.42 8.10 191.35 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000382.LAB 3/30/2010 12:28:15 6.6 17.39 8.17 191.34 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000383.LAB 3/30/2010 12:29:14 6.7 17.54 8.12 191.37 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000384.LAB 3/30/2010 12:30:13 6.6 17.57 8.16 191.37 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000385.LAB 3/30/2010 12:31:11 6.7 17.34 8.24 191.36 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000386.LAB 3/30/2010 12:32:10 6.7 17.19 8.22 191.34 0.818

MILL ON R2 000387 LAB 3/30/2010 12:33:09 6 7 17 32 8 28 191 34 0 817 MILL

_ ON

_ R2

_ 000387

. LAB 3/30/2010 12:33:09

. . . . . MILL_ON_R2_000388.LAB 3/30/2010 12:34:08 6.5 17.22 8.24 191.33 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000389.LAB 3/30/2010 12:35:06 6.5 17.24 8.27 191.33 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000390.LAB 3/30/2010 12:36:05 6.4 17.26 8.24 191.35 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000391.LAB 3/30/2010 12:37:04 6.4 17.24 8.14 191.36 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000392.LAB 3/30/2010 12:38:03 6.6 17.28 8.13 191.35 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000393.LAB 3/30/2010 12:39:02 6.6 17.52 8.17 191.37 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000394.LAB 3/30/2010 12:40:00 6.5 17.54 8.13 191.36 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000395.LAB 3/30/2010 12:40:59 6.7 17.53 8.17 191.36 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000396.LAB 3/30/2010 12:41:58 6.7 17.53 8.12 191.32 0.819 MILL_ON_R2_000397.LAB 3/30/2010 12:42:57 6.8 17.54 8.12 191.34 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000398.LAB 3/30/2010 12:43:55 6.6 17.58 8.17 191.31 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000399.LAB 3/30/2010 12:44:54 6.6 17.69 8.20 191.28 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000400.LAB 3/30/2010 12:45:53 6.7 17.55 8.16 191.29 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000401.LAB 3/30/2010 12:46:52 6.4 17.58 8.14 191.31 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000402.LAB 3/30/2010 12:47:51 6.3 17.49 8.15 191.30 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000403.LAB 3/30/2010 12:48:49 6.4 17.46 8.14 191.33 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000404.LAB 3/30/2010 12:49:48 6.5 17.55 8.12 191.30 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000405.LAB 3/30/2010 12:50:47 6.5 17.54 8.15 191.30 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000406.LAB 3/30/2010 12:51:46 6.5 17.46 8.17 191.31 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000407.LAB 3/30/2010 12:52:45 6.5 17.34 8.14 191.29 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000408.LAB 3/30/2010 12:53:43 6.5 17.37 8.22 191.29 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000409.LAB 3/30/2010 12:54:42 6.5 17.50 8.18 191.29 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000410.LAB 3/30/2010 12:55:41 6.5 17.33 8.07 191.30 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000411.LAB 3/30/2010 12:56:40 6.5 17.39 8.16 191.34 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000412.LAB 3/30/2010 12:57:38 6.6 17.52 8.14 191.33 0.817



### Prj. # 1663

### Cal Portland Cement Company, Mojave, CA ‐ Test Run #2 ‐ FTIR Data

FTIR Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) FTIR Gas Cell Temp (C) FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm) MILL_ON_R2_000413.LAB 3/30/2010 12:58:37 6.5 17.56 8.14 191.31 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000414.LAB 3/30/2010 12:59:36 6.4 17.54 8.10 191.32 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000415.LAB 3/30/2010 13:00:35 6.5 17.56 8.12 191.33 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000416.LAB 3/30/2010 13:01:34 6.6 17.50 8.03 191.33 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000417.LAB 3/30/2010 13:02:32 6.7 17.43 8.10 191.33 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000418.LAB 3/30/2010 13:03:31 6.6 17.34 8.12 191.33 0.818 MILL_ON_R2_000419.LAB 3/30/2010 13:04:30 6.4 17.50 8.08 191.34 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000420.LAB 3/30/2010 13:05:29 6.5 17.50 8.06 191.33 0.817 MILL_ON_R2_000421.LAB 3/30/2010 13:06:27 6.9 17.54 8.13 191.35 0.817

Minimum 5.3 17.2 8.0
Maximum 6.9 17.8 8.3 Average 6.3 17.5 8.2



### Prj. # 1663

### Cal Portland Cement Company, Mojave, CA ‐ Test Run #3 ‐ FTIR Data

FTIR Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) FTIR Gas Cell Temp (C) FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm) MILL_ON_R3_000456.LAB 3/30/2010 13:40:13 5.4 17.52 8.28 191.32 0.811 MILL_ON_R3_000457.LAB 3/30/2010 13:41:12 5.3 17.35 8.26 191.29 0.812 MILL_ON_R3_000458.LAB 3/30/2010 13:42:11 5.5 17.48 8.28 191.29 0.813 MILL_ON_R3_000459.LAB 3/30/2010 13:43:10 5.5 17.65 8.29 191.30 0.813 MILL_ON_R3_000460.LAB 3/30/2010 13:44:09 5.5 17.43 8.30 191.34 0.814 MILL_ON_R3_000461.LAB 3/30/2010 13:45:07 5.5 17.60 8.32 191.33 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000462.LAB 3/30/2010 13:46:06 5.5 17.46 8.28 191.35 0.816 MILL_ON_R3_000463.LAB 3/30/2010 13:47:05 5.5 17.57 8.26 191.31 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000464.LAB 3/30/2010 13:48:04 5.5 17.51 8.25 191.26 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000465.LAB 3/30/2010 13:49:02 5.3 17.37 8.29 191.28 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000466.LAB 3/30/2010 13:50:01 5.2 17.44 8.26 191.32 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000467.LAB 3/30/2010 13:51:00 5.6 17.58 8.32 191.31 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000468.LAB 3/30/2010 13:51:59 5.6 17.68 8.35 191.32 0.816 MILL_ON_R3_000469.LAB 3/30/2010 13:52:58 5.7 17.50 8.31 191.30 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000470.LAB 3/30/2010 13:53:56 5.7 17.52 8.31 191.30 0.816 MILL_ON_R3_000471.LAB 3/30/2010 13:54:55 6.1 17.66 8.29 191.32 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000472.LAB 3/30/2010 13:55:54 6.0 17.50 8.25 191.32 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000473.LAB 3/30/2010 13:56:53 6.0 17.41 8.19 191.29 0.814 MILL_ON_R3_000474.LAB 3/30/2010 13:57:51 5.9 17.39 8.17 191.31 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000475.LAB 3/30/2010 13:58:50 6.1 17.45 8.12 191.31 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000476.LAB 3/30/2010 13:59:49 6.1 17.52 8.13 191.34 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000477.LAB 3/30/2010 14:00:48 6.1 17.41 8.09 191.32 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000478.LAB 3/30/2010 14:01:47 6.2 17.29 8.07 191.34 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000479.LAB 3/30/2010 14:02:45 6.3 17.45 8.06 191.31 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000480.LAB 3/30/2010 14:03:44 6.3 17.37 8.04 191.29 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000481.LAB 3/30/2010 14:04:43 6.3 17.32 8.07 191.28 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000482.LAB 3/30/2010 14:05:42 6.2 17.38 8.12 191.29 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000483.LAB 3/30/2010 14:06:40 6.0 17.39 8.13 191.29 0.815

MILL ON R3 000484 LAB 3/30/2010 14:07:39 6 1 17 36 8 13 191 31 0 814 MILL

_ ON

_ R3

_ 000484

. LAB 3/30/2010 14:07:39

. . . . . MILL_ON_R3_000485.LAB 3/30/2010 14:08:38 6.0 17.37 8.11 191.35 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000486.LAB 3/30/2010 14:09:37 6.0 17.37 8.09 191.32 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000487.LAB 3/30/2010 14:10:36 6.0 17.56 8.18 191.28 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000488.LAB 3/30/2010 14:11:34 5.9 17.54 8.15 191.28 0.814 MILL_ON_R3_000489.LAB 3/30/2010 14:12:33 6.0 17.59 8.16 191.29 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000490.LAB 3/30/2010 14:13:32 5.9 17.32 8.14 191.30 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000491.LAB 3/30/2010 14:14:31 5.9 17.52 8.22 191.31 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000492.LAB 3/30/2010 14:15:30 6.0 17.65 8.14 191.29 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000493.LAB 3/30/2010 14:16:28 6.0 17.67 8.15 191.30 0.814 MILL_ON_R3_000494.LAB 3/30/2010 14:17:27 5.9 17.69 8.30 191.32 0.813 MILL_ON_R3_000495.LAB 3/30/2010 14:18:26 5.8 17.53 8.32 191.29 0.814 MILL_ON_R3_000496.LAB 3/30/2010 14:19:25 5.6 17.52 8.28 191.28 0.814 MILL_ON_R3_000497.LAB 3/30/2010 14:20:23 5.7 17.49 8.16 191.26 0.814 MILL_ON_R3_000498.LAB 3/30/2010 14:21:22 5.6 17.54 8.22 191.28 0.814 MILL_ON_R3_000499.LAB 3/30/2010 14:22:21 5.6 17.48 8.20 191.31 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000500.LAB 3/30/2010 14:23:20 5.7 17.62 8.23 191.30 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000501.LAB 3/30/2010 14:24:19 5.7 17.71 8.25 191.31 0.813 MILL_ON_R3_000502.LAB 3/30/2010 14:25:17 5.6 17.57 8.14 191.28 0.815 MILL_ON_R3_000503.LAB 3/30/2010 14:26:16 5.6 17.65 8.14 191.29 0.814 MILL_ON_R3_000504.LAB 3/30/2010 14:27:15 5.8 17.70 8.18 191.27 0.814 MILL_ON_R3_000505.LAB 3/30/2010 14:28:14 5.7 17.73 8.23 191.29 0.814 MILL_ON_R3_000506.LAB 3/30/2010 14:29:12 5.6 17.85 8.22 191.29 0.814 MILL_ON_R3_000507.LAB 3/30/2010 14:30:11 5.6 17.77 8.24 191.29 0.814 MILL_ON_R3_000508.LAB 3/30/2010 14:31:10 5.6 17.72 8.16 191.30 0.814 MILL_ON_R3_000509.LAB 3/30/2010 14:32:09 5.7 17.99 8.32 191.29 0.813



### Prj. # 1663

### Cal Portland Cement Company, Mojave, CA ‐ Test Run #3 ‐ FTIR Data

FTIR Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) FTIR Gas Cell Temp (C) FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm) MILL_ON_R3_000510.LAB 3/30/2010 14:33:08 5.5 17.67 8.31 191.32 0.813 MILL_ON_R3_000511.LAB 3/30/2010 14:34:06 5.2 17.59 8.30 191.31 0.813 MILL_ON_R3_000512.LAB 3/30/2010 14:35:05 5.0 17.56 8.29 191.30 0.814 MILL_ON_R3_000513.LAB 3/30/2010 14:36:04 5.4 17.63 8.26 191.31 0.814 MILL_ON_R3_000514.LAB 3/30/2010 14:37:03 5.6 17.49 8.25 191.29 0.814 MILL_ON_R3_000515.LAB 3/30/2010 14:38:01 5.7 17.55 8.28 191.29 0.814 MILL_ON_R3_000516.LAB 3/30/2010 14:39:00 5.7 17.65 8.25 191.29 0.814 MILL_ON_R3_000517.LAB 3/30/2010 14:39:59 6.1 17.65 8.30 191.27 0.814 MILL_ON_R3_000518.LAB 3/30/2010 14:40:58 6.1 17.50 8.34 191.27 0.814

Minimum 5.0 17.3 8.0
Maximum 6.3 18.0 8.4 Average 5.8 17.5 8.2



### Prj. # 1663

# APPENDIX

Main Stack – Raw Mill Off FTIR Test Run Data

### Cal Portland Cement Company, Mojave, CA ‐ Test Run #4 ‐ FTIR Data

FTIR Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) FTIR Gas Cell Temp (C) FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm) MILL_OFF_R4_000639.LAB 3/31/2010 7:19:57 52.4 18.53 4.03 191.38 0.832 MILL_OFF_R4_000640.LAB 3/31/2010 7:20:56 52.1 18.41 4.01 191.38 0.833 MILL_OFF_R4_000641.LAB 3/31/2010 7:21:55 51.6 18.32 3.98 191.42 0.833 MILL_OFF_R4_000642.LAB 3/31/2010 7:22:53 51.7 18.13 3.96 191.40 0.833 MILL_OFF_R4_000643.LAB 3/31/2010 7:23:52 51.5 18.07 3.95 191.38 0.834 MILL_OFF_R4_000644.LAB 3/31/2010 7:24:51 51.7 18.06 3.94 191.40 0.834 MILL_OFF_R4_000645.LAB 3/31/2010 7:25:50 52.1 18.35 3.97 191.39 0.834 MILL_OFF_R4_000646.LAB 3/31/2010 7:26:49 52.3 18.29 3.99 191.38 0.834 MILL_OFF_R4_000647.LAB 3/31/2010 7:27:47 51.8 18.20 3.98 191.46 0.835 MILL_OFF_R4_000648.LAB 3/31/2010 7:28:46 51.3 18.18 3.94 191.45 0.835 MILL_OFF_R4_000649.LAB 3/31/2010 7:29:45 51.7 18.36 3.97 191.42 0.836 MILL_OFF_R4_000650.LAB 3/31/2010 7:30:44 51.7 18.20 3.96 191.41 0.836 MILL_OFF_R4_000651.LAB 3/31/2010 7:31:43 51.4 18.15 3.93 191.38 0.836 MILL_OFF_R4_000652.LAB 3/31/2010 7:32:41 51.2 18.26 3.95 191.38 0.836 MILL_OFF_R4_000653.LAB 3/31/2010 7:33:40 51.3 18.24 3.95 191.38 0.836 MILL_OFF_R4_000654.LAB 3/31/2010 7:34:39 54.7 19.62 4.23 191.38 0.836 MILL_OFF_R4_000655.LAB 3/31/2010 7:35:38 60.0 21.64 4.57 191.41 0.835 MILL_OFF_R4_000656.LAB 3/31/2010 7:36:36 58.5 21.54 4.60 191.38 0.835 MILL_OFF_R4_000657.LAB 3/31/2010 7:37:35 57.0 21.27 4.55 191.40 0.835 MILL_OFF_R4_000658.LAB 3/31/2010 7:38:34 55.3 20.30 4.38 191.38 0.835 MILL_OFF_R4_000659.LAB 3/31/2010 7:39:33 57.0 20.78 4.47 191.38 0.835 MILL_OFF_R4_000660.LAB 3/31/2010 7:40:32 59.3 21.71 4.61 191.38 0.835 MILL_OFF_R4_000661.LAB 3/31/2010 7:41:30 59.5 21.86 4.61 191.38 0.834 MILL_OFF_R4_000662.LAB 3/31/2010 7:42:29 59.0 21.55 4.57 191.39 0.835 MILL_OFF_R4_000663.LAB 3/31/2010 7:43:28 58.5 21.26 4.56 191.39 0.835 MILL_OFF_R4_000664.LAB 3/31/2010 7:44:27 58.6 21.40 4.55 191.36 0.835 MILL_OFF_R4_000665.LAB 3/31/2010 7:45:26 58.6 21.52 4.57 191.36 0.835 MILL_OFF_R4_000666.LAB 3/31/2010 7:46:24 59.7 21.66 4.55 191.37 0.835

MILL OFF R4 000667 LAB 3/31/2010 7:47:23 59 5 21 51 4 57 191 36 0 835 MILL

_ OFF

_ R4

_ 000667

. LAB 3/31/2010 7:47:23

. . . . . MILL_OFF_R4_000668.LAB 3/31/2010 7:48:22 59.5 21.66 4.54 191.38 0.835 MILL_OFF_R4_000669.LAB 3/31/2010 7:49:21 59.2 21.66 4.57 191.38 0.834 MILL_OFF_R4_000670.LAB 3/31/2010 7:50:20 59.6 21.63 4.55 191.39 0.834 MILL_OFF_R4_000671.LAB 3/31/2010 7:51:18 59.3 21.52 4.54 191.38 0.834 MILL_OFF_R4_000672.LAB 3/31/2010 7:52:17 58.4 21.42 4.53 191.36 0.834 MILL_OFF_R4_000673.LAB 3/31/2010 7:53:16 58.0 21.49 4.51 191.38 0.834 MILL_OFF_R4_000674.LAB 3/31/2010 7:54:15 58.2 21.50 4.54 191.37 0.834 MILL_OFF_R4_000675.LAB 3/31/2010 7:55:13 58.5 21.59 4.57 191.43 0.834 MILL_OFF_R4_000676.LAB 3/31/2010 7:56:12 58.5 21.59 4.58 191.37 0.834 MILL_OFF_R4_000677.LAB 3/31/2010 7:57:11 58.3 21.64 4.56 191.42 0.833 MILL_OFF_R4_000678.LAB 3/31/2010 7:58:10 58.1 21.58 4.52 191.44 0.834 MILL_OFF_R4_000679.LAB 3/31/2010 7:59:09 58.8 21.53 4.54 191.42 0.834 MILL_OFF_R4_000680.LAB 3/31/2010 8:00:07 59.2 21.41 4.50 191.40 0.834 MILL_OFF_R4_000681.LAB 3/31/2010 8:01:06 59.1 21.51 4.49 191.37 0.833 MILL_OFF_R4_000682.LAB 3/31/2010 8:02:05 59.3 21.48 4.53 191.40 0.834 MILL_OFF_R4_000683.LAB 3/31/2010 8:03:04 60.0 21.56 4.52 191.40 0.834 MILL_OFF_R4_000684.LAB 3/31/2010 8:04:03 59.3 21.23 4.47 191.37 0.833 MILL_OFF_R4_000685.LAB 3/31/2010 8:05:01 59.9 21.66 4.53 191.37 0.834 MILL_OFF_R4_000686.LAB 3/31/2010 8:06:00 59.0 21.53 4.49 191.37 0.836 MILL_OFF_R4_000687.LAB 3/31/2010 8:06:59 59.1 21.68 4.53 191.41 0.836 MILL_OFF_R4_000688.LAB 3/31/2010 8:07:58 58.9 21.43 4.51 191.45 0.836 MILL_OFF_R4_000689.LAB 3/31/2010 8:08:57 58.7 21.47 4.50 191.38 0.836 MILL_OFF_R4_000690.LAB 3/31/2010 8:09:55 58.4 21.39 4.46 191.36 0.836 MILL_OFF_R4_000691.LAB 3/31/2010 8:10:54 59.4 21.70 4.52 191.35 0.836 MILL_OFF_R4_000692.LAB 3/31/2010 8:11:53 59.2 21.48 4.52 191.37 0.835



### Prj. # 1663

### Cal Portland Cement Company, Mojave, CA ‐ Test Run #4 ‐ FTIR Data

FTIR Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) FTIR Gas Cell Temp (C) FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm) MILL_OFF_R4_000693.LAB 3/31/2010 8:12:52 59.9 21.82 4.54 191.39 0.835 MILL_OFF_R4_000694.LAB 3/31/2010 8:13:51 59.9 21.62 4.53 191.36 0.835 MILL_OFF_R4_000695.LAB 3/31/2010 8:14:49 60.7 21.72 4.56 191.35 0.835 MILL_OFF_R4_000696.LAB 3/31/2010 8:15:48 60.3 21.41 4.55 191.36 0.836 MILL_OFF_R4_000697.LAB 3/31/2010 8:16:47 61.0 21.65 4.55 191.35 0.836 MILL_OFF_R4_000698.LAB 3/31/2010 8:17:46 61.0 21.70 4.54 191.35 0.835 MILL_OFF_R4_000699.LAB 3/31/2010 8:18:44 61.1 21.66 4.55 191.38 0.835 MILL_OFF_R4_000700.LAB 3/31/2010 8:19:43 60.8 21.47 4.51 191.36 0.835 MILL_OFF_R4_000701.LAB 3/31/2010 8:20:42 61.9 21.73 4.56 191.36 0.835

Minimum 51.2 18.1 3.9
Maximum 61.9 21.9 4.6 Average 57.3 20.7 4.4



### Prj. # 1663

### Cal Portland Cement Company, Mojave, CA ‐ Test Run #5 ‐ FTIR Data

FTIR Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) FTIR Gas Cell Temp (C) FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm) MILL_OFF_R5_000777.LAB 3/31/2010 13:36:16 77.8 14.55 5.86 191.40 0.837 MILL_OFF_R5_000778.LAB 3/31/2010 13:37:15 82.3 15.01 6.13 191.38 0.838 MILL_OFF_R5_000779.LAB 3/31/2010 13:38:14 83.8 15.41 6.28 191.40 0.838 MILL_OFF_R5_000780.LAB 3/31/2010 13:39:13 85.7 15.55 6.77 191.37 0.837 MILL_OFF_R5_000781.LAB 3/31/2010 13:40:11 86.5 15.62 6.83 191.42 0.837 MILL_OFF_R5_000782.LAB 3/31/2010 13:41:10 84.0 15.13 6.73 191.45 0.838 MILL_OFF_R5_000783.LAB 3/31/2010 13:42:09 80.6 14.94 6.54 191.38 0.839 MILL_OFF_R5_000784.LAB 3/31/2010 13:43:08 81.4 15.02 6.60 191.40 0.839 MILL_OFF_R5_000785.LAB 3/31/2010 13:44:07 80.2 14.94 6.49 191.39 0.839 MILL_OFF_R5_000786.LAB 3/31/2010 13:45:05 81.5 15.03 6.56 191.36 0.839 MILL_OFF_R5_000787.LAB 3/31/2010 13:46:04 82.0 15.37 6.56 191.36 0.839 MILL_OFF_R5_000788.LAB 3/31/2010 13:47:03 82.5 15.38 6.59 191.38 0.839 MILL_OFF_R5_000789.LAB 3/31/2010 13:48:02 81.7 15.24 6.56 191.41 0.838 MILL_OFF_R5_000790.LAB 3/31/2010 13:49:01 84.3 16.19 6.84 191.37 0.838 MILL_OFF_R5_000791.LAB 3/31/2010 13:50:00 78.6 15.80 6.34 191.35 0.838 MILL_OFF_R5_000792.LAB 3/31/2010 13:50:58 64.2 14.52 4.78 191.37 0.839 MILL_OFF_R5_000793.LAB 3/31/2010 13:51:57 65.9 14.72 4.72 191.46 0.839 MILL_OFF_R5_000794.LAB 3/31/2010 13:52:56 66.5 14.86 4.68 191.41 0.838 MILL_OFF_R5_000795.LAB 3/31/2010 13:53:55 66.9 15.02 4.70 191.41 0.839 MILL_OFF_R5_000796.LAB 3/31/2010 13:54:54 66.6 15.19 4.67 191.46 0.839 MILL_OFF_R5_000797.LAB 3/31/2010 13:55:52 66.3 15.15 4.68 191.40 0.838 MILL_OFF_R5_000798.LAB 3/31/2010 13:56:51 65.2 15.11 4.67 191.38 0.838 MILL_OFF_R5_000799.LAB 3/31/2010 13:57:50 63.1 15.32 4.36 191.37 0.838 MILL_OFF_R5_000800.LAB 3/31/2010 13:58:49 61.8 15.30 4.09 191.39 0.837 MILL_OFF_R5_000801.LAB 3/31/2010 13:59:48 60.9 15.31 4.06 191.41 0.837 MILL_OFF_R5_000802.LAB 3/31/2010 14:00:46 62.7 15.85 4.23 191.40 0.837 MILL_OFF_R5_000803.LAB 3/31/2010 14:01:45 63.7 16.28 4.35 191.39 0.837 MILL_OFF_R5_000804.LAB 3/31/2010 14:02:44 59.9 15.73 4.06 191.46 0.838

MILL OFF R5 000805 LAB 3/31/2010 14:03:43 55 9 15 32 3 57 191 44 0 838 MILL

_ OFF

_ R5

_ 000805

. LAB 3/31/2010 14:03:43

. . . . . MILL_OFF_R5_000806.LAB 3/31/2010 14:04:42 55.2 15.05 3.47 191.41 0.838 MILL_OFF_R5_000807.LAB 3/31/2010 14:05:40 56.2 15.31 3.50 191.39 0.838 MILL_OFF_R5_000808.LAB 3/31/2010 14:06:39 58.0 15.59 3.54 191.35 0.838 MILL_OFF_R5_000809.LAB 3/31/2010 14:07:38 57.9 15.83 3.59 191.39 0.838 MILL_OFF_R5_000810.LAB 3/31/2010 14:08:37 59.3 16.14 3.64 191.39 0.837 MILL_OFF_R5_000811.LAB 3/31/2010 14:09:36 61.4 16.72 3.76 191.38 0.837 MILL_OFF_R5_000812.LAB 3/31/2010 14:10:34 62.2 16.85 3.75 191.38 0.837 MILL_OFF_R5_000813.LAB 3/31/2010 14:11:33 61.3 16.52 3.73 191.36 0.836 MILL_OFF_R5_000814.LAB 3/31/2010 14:12:32 61.7 16.41 3.75 191.36 0.836 MILL_OFF_R5_000815.LAB 3/31/2010 14:13:31 62.1 16.51 3.74 191.35 0.836 MILL_OFF_R5_000816.LAB 3/31/2010 14:14:30 62.3 16.58 3.76 191.32 0.837 MILL_OFF_R5_000817.LAB 3/31/2010 14:15:28 61.4 16.61 3.77 191.33 0.837 MILL_OFF_R5_000818.LAB 3/31/2010 14:16:27 60.9 16.48 3.75 191.36 0.837 MILL_OFF_R5_000819.LAB 3/31/2010 14:17:26 61.2 16.35 3.75 191.39 0.836 MILL_OFF_R5_000820.LAB 3/31/2010 14:18:25 60.8 16.25 3.73 191.38 0.837 MILL_OFF_R5_000821.LAB 3/31/2010 14:19:24 61.9 16.65 3.78 191.39 0.837 MILL_OFF_R5_000822.LAB 3/31/2010 14:20:23 61.1 16.41 3.76 191.42 0.836 MILL_OFF_R5_000823.LAB 3/31/2010 14:21:21 60.8 16.42 3.76 191.47 0.836 MILL_OFF_R5_000824.LAB 3/31/2010 14:22:20 62.2 16.56 3.78 191.39 0.836 MILL_OFF_R5_000825.LAB 3/31/2010 14:23:19 62.4 16.65 3.77 191.37 0.836 MILL_OFF_R5_000826.LAB 3/31/2010 14:24:18 62.6 16.56 3.78 191.35 0.836 MILL_OFF_R5_000827.LAB 3/31/2010 14:25:17 63.6 16.84 3.89 191.38 0.836 MILL_OFF_R5_000828.LAB 3/31/2010 14:26:15 61.9 16.46 3.75 191.39 0.836 MILL_OFF_R5_000829.LAB 3/31/2010 14:27:14 61.8 16.83 3.74 191.39 0.837 MILL_OFF_R5_000830.LAB 3/31/2010 14:28:13 61.3 16.52 3.72 191.47 0.838



### Prj. # 1663

### Cal Portland Cement Company, Mojave, CA ‐ Test Run #5 ‐ FTIR Data

FTIR Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) FTIR Gas Cell Temp (C) FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm) MILL_OFF_R5_000831.LAB 3/31/2010 14:29:12 61.1 16.53 3.73 191.40 0.838 MILL_OFF_R5_000832.LAB 3/31/2010 14:30:10 61.4 16.46 3.69 191.44 0.838 MILL_OFF_R5_000833.LAB 3/31/2010 14:31:09 61.6 16.64 3.67 191.48 0.838 MILL_OFF_R5_000834.LAB 3/31/2010 14:32:08 61.8 16.68 3.68 191.41 0.837 MILL_OFF_R5_000835.LAB 3/31/2010 14:33:07 61.9 16.77 3.74 191.46 0.837 MILL_OFF_R5_000836.LAB 3/31/2010 14:34:06 62.5 16.70 3.72 191.40 0.836 MILL_OFF_R5_000837.LAB 3/31/2010 14:35:05 63.4 16.88 3.73 191.39 0.836 MILL_OFF_R5_000838.LAB 3/31/2010 14:36:03 63.1 16.91 3.73 191.36 0.836

Minimum 55.2 14.5 3.5
Maximum 86.5 16.9 6.8 Average 66.8 15.9 4.5



### Prj. # 1663

### Cal Portland Cement Company, Mojave, CA ‐ Test Run #6 ‐ FTIR Data

FTIR Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) FTIR Gas Cell Temp (C) FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm) MILL_OFF_R6_000858.LAB 3/31/2010 14:54:52 64.1 17.99 3.96 191.39 0.837 MILL_OFF_R6_000859.LAB 3/31/2010 14:55:51 63.8 17.80 3.93 191.37 0.837 MILL_OFF_R6_000860.LAB 3/31/2010 14:56:50 64.3 17.86 3.95 191.39 0.837 MILL_OFF_R6_000861.LAB 3/31/2010 14:57:49 64.9 17.83 3.92 191.37 0.837 MILL_OFF_R6_000862.LAB 3/31/2010 14:58:48 65.2 18.02 3.95 191.36 0.837 MILL_OFF_R6_000863.LAB 3/31/2010 14:59:46 64.4 17.97 3.94 191.35 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000864.LAB 3/31/2010 15:00:45 64.9 18.15 3.97 191.36 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000865.LAB 3/31/2010 15:01:44 64.9 18.11 3.96 191.39 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000866.LAB 3/31/2010 15:02:43 66.4 18.46 4.05 191.42 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000867.LAB 3/31/2010 15:03:42 66.1 18.53 4.03 191.46 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000868.LAB 3/31/2010 15:04:40 66.6 18.67 4.05 191.45 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000869.LAB 3/31/2010 15:05:39 65.0 18.37 3.98 191.45 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000870.LAB 3/31/2010 15:06:38 66.6 18.60 4.04 191.38 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000871.LAB 3/31/2010 15:07:37 65.3 18.26 3.95 191.36 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000872.LAB 3/31/2010 15:08:36 65.9 18.63 4.05 191.36 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000873.LAB 3/31/2010 15:09:34 66.6 18.66 4.05 191.36 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000874.LAB 3/31/2010 15:10:33 67.5 18.81 4.10 191.37 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000875.LAB 3/31/2010 15:11:32 65.3 18.34 3.99 191.38 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000876.LAB 3/31/2010 15:12:31 66.3 18.64 4.04 191.38 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000877.LAB 3/31/2010 15:13:30 65.9 18.41 3.99 191.42 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000878.LAB 3/31/2010 15:14:28 66.3 18.47 4.05 191.41 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000879.LAB 3/31/2010 15:15:27 66.1 18.50 4.01 191.37 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000880.LAB 3/31/2010 15:16:26 65.9 18.44 4.02 191.39 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000881.LAB 3/31/2010 15:17:25 65.8 18.45 4.03 191.39 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000882.LAB 3/31/2010 15:18:24 65.9 18.46 4.04 191.42 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000883.LAB 3/31/2010 15:19:22 66.0 18.38 4.02 191.40 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000884.LAB 3/31/2010 15:20:21 66.3 18.66 4.06 191.41 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000885.LAB 3/31/2010 15:21:20 66.3 18.51 4.03 191.43 0.837

MILL OFF R6 000886 LAB 3/31/2010 15:22:19 66 3 18 51 3 99 191 39 0 836 MILL

_ OFF

_ R6

_ 000886

. LAB 3/31/2010 15:22:19

. . . . . MILL_OFF_R6_000887.LAB 3/31/2010 15:23:18 66.6 18.39 3.99 191.39 0.838 MILL_OFF_R6_000888.LAB 3/31/2010 15:24:17 67.2 18.78 4.04 191.37 0.838 MILL_OFF_R6_000889.LAB 3/31/2010 15:25:15 67.9 18.96 4.08 191.38 0.837 MILL_OFF_R6_000890.LAB 3/31/2010 15:26:14 67.9 18.88 4.11 191.37 0.837 MILL_OFF_R6_000891.LAB 3/31/2010 15:27:13 67.9 18.95 4.11 191.38 0.837 MILL_OFF_R6_000892.LAB 3/31/2010 15:28:12 68.4 19.11 4.12 191.37 0.837 MILL_OFF_R6_000893.LAB 3/31/2010 15:29:11 68.4 19.11 4.14 191.37 0.837 MILL_OFF_R6_000894.LAB 3/31/2010 15:30:09 68.2 19.03 4.14 191.37 0.837 MILL_OFF_R6_000895.LAB 3/31/2010 15:31:08 68.9 18.85 4.13 191.36 0.837 MILL_OFF_R6_000896.LAB 3/31/2010 15:32:07 69.4 19.22 4.22 191.36 0.837 MILL_OFF_R6_000897.LAB 3/31/2010 15:33:06 69.2 19.13 4.26 191.38 0.837 MILL_OFF_R6_000898.LAB 3/31/2010 15:34:05 69.3 19.08 4.26 191.39 0.837 MILL_OFF_R6_000899.LAB 3/31/2010 15:35:03 69.8 19.19 4.26 191.40 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000900.LAB 3/31/2010 15:36:02 71.6 19.69 4.34 191.42 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000901.LAB 3/31/2010 15:37:01 70.2 19.35 4.29 191.40 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000902.LAB 3/31/2010 15:38:00 70.6 19.44 4.30 191.36 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000903.LAB 3/31/2010 15:38:59 70.9 19.38 4.33 191.36 0.835 MILL_OFF_R6_000904.LAB 3/31/2010 15:39:57 71.8 19.77 4.34 191.35 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000905.LAB 3/31/2010 15:40:56 70.2 19.52 4.29 191.35 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000906.LAB 3/31/2010 15:41:55 70.6 19.83 4.33 191.36 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000907.LAB 3/31/2010 15:42:54 71.2 19.79 4.30 191.37 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000908.LAB 3/31/2010 15:43:53 72.6 20.07 4.34 191.36 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000909.LAB 3/31/2010 15:44:51 70.3 19.52 4.22 191.37 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000910.LAB 3/31/2010 15:45:50 69.8 19.54 4.22 191.36 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000911.LAB 3/31/2010 15:46:49 71.7 19.88 4.27 191.39 0.836



### Prj. # 1663

### Cal Portland Cement Company, Mojave, CA ‐ Test Run #6 ‐ FTIR Data

FTIR Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) FTIR Gas Cell Temp (C) FTIR Gas Cell

Pressure (Atm) MILL_OFF_R6_000912.LAB 3/31/2010 15:47:48 72.7 20.03 4.29 191.37 0.836 MILL_OFF_R6_000913.LAB 3/31/2010 15:48:47 72.2 19.78 4.20 191.40 0.838 MILL_OFF_R6_000914.LAB 3/31/2010 15:49:46 71.7 19.66 4.21 191.37 0.837 MILL_OFF_R6_000915.LAB 3/31/2010 15:50:44 70.5 19.67 4.17 191.37 0.837 MILL_OFF_R6_000916.LAB 3/31/2010 15:51:43 72.2 19.84 4.20 191.38 0.837 MILL_OFF_R6_000917.LAB 3/31/2010 15:52:42 71.4 19.83 4.18 191.37 0.832 MILL_OFF_R6_000918.LAB 3/31/2010 15:53:41 71.6 19.90 4.23 191.35 0.831 MILL_OFF_R6_000919.LAB 3/31/2010 15:54:40 71.1 20.14 4.28 191.36 0.830

Minimum 63.8 17.8 3.9
Maximum 72.7 20.1 4.3 Average 68.1 18.9 4.1



### Prj. # 1663

# APPENDIX

Main Stack FTIR QA/QC Data

### Cal Portland Cement Company, Mojave, CA ‐ FTIR QAQC Data

Prj. # 1663Prj. 1663 100 0 CTS SYS RT 000043 LAB 3/30/2010 9:20:18 < < 87 1 87 1% 12 

### Nitrogen Direct

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
N2_DIR_000002BKG.LAB 3/30/2010 8:58:18 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_DIR_000003.LAB 3/30/2010 8:58:28 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_DIR_000004.LAB 3/30/2010 8:58:36 < 0.2 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5

CTS, 100.0 ppm Ethylene Direct Purge

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet) Ethylene Recovery (%)
100.0_CTS_DIR_000020.LAB 3/30/2010 9:03:54 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 99.3 99.3% 100.0_CTS_DIR_000021.LAB 3/30/2010 9:04:01 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 99.5 99.5% 100.0_CTS_DIR_000022.LAB 3/30/2010 9:04:09 < 0.2 0.03 < 0.01 < 0.01 99.4 99.4% 100.0_CTS_DIR_000023.LAB 3/30/2010 9:04:17 < 0.2 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.01 99.6 99.6% 100.0_CTS_DIR_000024.LAB 3/30/2010 9:04:25 < 0.2 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 99.4 99.4% 100.0_CTS_DIR_000025.LAB 3/30/2010 9:04:33 < 0.2 0.03 < 0.01 < 0.01 99.8 99.8%

181.1 ppm HCl / 3.88 ppm SF6 Direct Purge

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet) HCl Recovery (%)
181.1_HCL_DIR_000036.LAB 3/30/2010 9:10:41 177.9 0.02 0.03 3.88 < 0.5 98.2% 181.1_HCL_DIR_000037.LAB 3/30/2010 9:10:49 178.4 0.03 < 0.01 3.89 < 0.5 98.5% 181.1_HCL_DIR_000038.LAB 3/30/2010 9:10:57 178.3 0.02 < 0.01 3.89 < 0.5 98.5% 181.1_HCL_DIR_000039.LAB 3/30/2010 9:11:05 178.1 < 0.01 0.03 3.89 < 0.5 98.4% 181.1_HCL_DIR_000040.LAB 3/30/2010 9:11:13 178.3 0.03 < 0.01 3.89 < 0.5 98.5%

CTS, 100.0 ppm Ethylene System Purge and Response Time Test

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet) Ethylene Recovery (%) 

### Response
Time* (sec)
100.0_CTS_SYS_RT_000041.LAB 3/30/2010 9:20:10 0.2 0.04 0.95 < 0.01 < 0.5 0.0% 4 100.0_CTS_SYS_RT_000042.LAB 3/30/2010 9:20:14 0.4 0.03 0.78 < 0.01 19.2 19.2% 8

100 0 CTS SYS RT 000043 LAB
. _ _ _ _ . 3/30/2010 9:20:18 < 0 2

. 0 0

. 4 0 1

. 3 < 0 0

. 1 87 1

. 87 1%

. 12 100.0_CTS_SYS_RT_000044.LAB 3/30/2010 9:20:22 < 0.2 < 0.01 0.04 < 0.01 96.8 96.8% 16 100.0_CTS_SYS_RT_000045.LAB 3/30/2010 9:20:26 < 0.2 < 0.01 0.03 < 0.01 97.6 97.6% 100.0_CTS_SYS_RT_000046.LAB 3/30/2010 9:20:30 < 0.2 0.03 0.02 < 0.01 97.7 97.7% 100.0_CTS_SYS_RT_000047.LAB 3/30/2010 9:20:34 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 98.3 98.3% 100.0_CTS_SYS_RT_000048.LAB 3/30/2010 9:20:38 < 0.2 < 0.01 0.02 < 0.01 98.2 98.2% 100.0_CTS_SYS_RT_000049.LAB 3/30/2010 9:20:41 < 0.2 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.01 97.9 97.9% 100.0_CTS_SYS_RT_000050.LAB 3/30/2010 9:20:45 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 97.9 97.9% 100.0_CTS_SYS_RT_000051.LAB 3/30/2010 9:20:50 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 98.3 98.3%

* Response Time = Time to recovery 95% of calibration gas delivered through the sampling system

Nitrogen System Purge

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
N2_SYS_000052.LAB 3/30/2010 9:22:40 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_SYS_000053.LAB 3/30/2010 9:22:56 < 0.2 0.01 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_SYS_000054.LAB 3/30/2010 9:23:11 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_SYS_000055.LAB 3/30/2010 9:28:41 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5

### Cal Portland Cement Company, Mojave, CA ‐ FTIR QAQC Data

Prj. # 1663Prj. 1663 49 9 HCL SYS RT 000080 LAB 3/30/2010 50 40 8 < 82 3% 90 Main Stack Effluent, Mill On

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
MILL_ON_000056.LAB 3/30/2010 9:41:43 4.0 17.78 8.52 < 0.01 0.7 MILL_ON_000057.LAB 3/30/2010 9:42:14 4.3 17.67 8.47 < 0.01 0.7 MILL_ON_000058.LAB 3/30/2010 9:42:46 4.3 17.78 8.48 < 0.01 0.7 MILL_ON_000059.LAB 3/30/2010 9:43:17 4.4 17.67 8.55 < 0.01 0.7 MILL_ON_000060.LAB 3/30/2010 9:43:48 4.5 17.65 8.52 < 0.01 0.8 MILL_ON_000061.LAB 3/30/2010 9:44:20 4.7 17.63 8.52 < 0.01 0.8 MILL_ON_000062.LAB 3/30/2010 9:44:51 4.7 17.76 8.55 < 0.01 0.8 MILL_ON_000063.LAB 3/30/2010 9:45:22 4.8 17.80 8.69 < 0.01 0.6 MILL_ON_000064.LAB 3/30/2010 9:45:54 4.9 17.73 8.62 < 0.01 0.8 MILL_ON_000065.LAB 3/30/2010 9:46:25 4.8 17.78 8.55 < 0.01 0.8 MILL_ON_000066.LAB 3/30/2010 9:46:56 4.8 17.75 8.58 < 0.01 0.7 MILL_ON_000067.LAB 3/30/2010 9:47:28 4.9 17.87 8.65 < 0.01 0.7 MILL_ON_000068.LAB 3/30/2010 9:47:59 5.0 17.69 8.64 < 0.01 0.8

181.1 ppm HCl / 3.88 ppm SF6 System Purge & Response Time Test

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet) HCl Recovery (%) 

### Response
Time* (sec)
49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000069.LAB 3/30/2010 9:49:05 11.4 15.90 7.84 0.29 0.5 22.9% 4 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000070.LAB 3/30/2010 9:49:13 11.2 1.15 0.63 3.53 < 0.5 22.6% 12 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000071.LAB 3/30/2010 9:49:21 23.2 0.08 0.09 3.77 < 0.5 46.8% 20 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000072.LAB 3/30/2010 9:49:29 29.5 0.05 0.04 3.78 < 0.5 59.5% 28 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000073.LAB 3/30/2010 9:49:36 33.1 0.05 0.04 3.79 < 0.5 66.8% 35 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000074.LAB 3/30/2010 9:49:44 35.2 0.02 0.02 3.80 < 0.5 71.0% 43 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000075.LAB 3/30/2010 9:49:52 36.7 0.04 0.02 3.80 < 0.5 74.0% 51 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000076.LAB 3/30/2010 9:50:00 38.0 0.02 0.03 3.79 < 0.5 76.6% 59 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000077.LAB 3/30/2010 9:50:08 39.0 0.02 0.05 3.79 < 0.5 78.6% 67 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000078.LAB 3/30/2010 9:50:16 39.7 < 0.01 0.04 3.79 < 0.5 80.2% 75 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000079.LAB 3/30/2010 9:50:24 40.1 0.02 0.03 3.79 < 0.5 81.0% 82

49 9 HCL SYS RT 000080 LAB

. _ _ _ _ . 3/30/2010 9:50:31 9 : 40 8

. 0 0

. 1 0 0

. 5 3 7

. 9 < 0 5

. 82 3%

. 90 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000081.LAB 3/30/2010 9:50:39 41.1 0.02 < 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 83.0% 98 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000082.LAB 3/30/2010 9:50:47 41.6 0.04 0.02 3.79 < 0.5 83.9% 106 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000083.LAB 3/30/2010 9:50:55 41.9 0.01 0.02 3.80 < 0.5 84.6% 114 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000084.LAB 3/30/2010 9:51:03 42.4 < 0.01 0.02 3.80 < 0.5 85.6% 122 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000085.LAB 3/30/2010 9:51:11 42.8 0.01 0.02 3.80 < 0.5 86.3% 129 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000086.LAB 3/30/2010 9:51:18 43.0 0.03 0.02 3.80 < 0.5 86.7% 137 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000087.LAB 3/30/2010 9:51:26 43.1 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.80 < 0.5 87.0% 145 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000088.LAB 3/30/2010 9:51:34 43.5 0.02 0.03 3.80 < 0.5 87.7% 153 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000089.LAB 3/30/2010 9:51:42 43.3 0.01 0.01 3.80 < 0.5 87.3% 161 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000090.LAB 3/30/2010 9:51:50 43.4 0.04 0.04 3.80 < 0.5 87.6% 169 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000091.LAB 3/30/2010 9:51:58 43.5 0.03 0.02 3.79 < 0.5 87.8% 176 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000092.LAB 3/30/2010 9:52:05 43.7 0.01 0.02 3.79 < 0.5 88.2% 184 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000093.LAB 3/30/2010 9:52:13 43.9 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 88.5% 192 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000094.LAB 3/30/2010 9:52:21 44.0 0.03 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 88.8% 200 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000095.LAB 3/30/2010 9:52:29 44.0 < 0.01 0.05 3.79 < 0.5 88.9% 208 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000096.LAB 3/30/2010 9:52:37 44.3 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 89.4% 216 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000097.LAB 3/30/2010 9:52:45 44.3 < 0.01 0.02 3.79 < 0.5 89.4% 223 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000098.LAB 3/30/2010 9:52:52 44.2 < 0.01 0.02 3.79 < 0.5 89.2% 231 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000099.LAB 3/30/2010 9:53:00 44.6 < 0.01 0.02 3.79 < 0.5 89.9% 239 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000100.LAB 3/30/2010 9:53:08 44.4 0.01 0.03 3.79 < 0.5 89.7% 247 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000101.LAB 3/30/2010 9:53:16 44.6 0.02 0.02 3.79 < 0.5 89.9% 255 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000102.LAB 3/30/2010 9:53:24 44.7 0.02 < 0.01 3.80 < 0.5 90.2% 263 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000103.LAB 3/30/2010 9:53:32 44.8 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 90.5% 270 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000104.LAB 3/30/2010 9:53:39 44.9 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 90.5% 278 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000105.LAB 3/30/2010 9:53:48 44.9 0.02 0.01 3.80 < 0.5 90.7% 287 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000106.LAB 3/30/2010 9:53:55 45.1 0.01 < 0.01 3.80 < 0.5 91.0% 294 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000107.LAB 3/30/2010 9:54:03 45.2 < 0.01 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 91.1% 302

### Cal Portland Cement Company, Mojave, CA ‐ FTIR QAQC Data

Prj. # 1663Prj. 1663 49 9 HCL SYS RT 000136 LAB 3/30/2010 57 46 1 < 93 1% 529 181.1 ppm HCl / 3.88 ppm SF6 System Purge & Response Time Test, Continued

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet) HCl Recovery (%) 

### Response
Time* (sec)
49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000108.LAB 3/30/2010 9:54:11 45.0 0.02 0.03 3.80 < 0.5 90.8% 310 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000109.LAB 3/30/2010 9:54:19 45.2 0.02 0.02 3.79 < 0.5 91.2% 317 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000110.LAB 3/30/2010 9:54:26 45.2 0.01 0.03 3.80 < 0.5 91.2% 325 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000111.LAB 3/30/2010 9:54:34 45.6 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.80 < 0.5 92.0% 333 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000112.LAB 3/30/2010 9:54:42 45.3 0.02 < 0.01 3.80 < 0.5 91.4% 341 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000113.LAB 3/30/2010 9:54:50 45.5 < 0.01 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 91.9% 349 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000114.LAB 3/30/2010 9:54:58 45.4 < 0.01 0.02 3.79 < 0.5 91.6% 357 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000115.LAB 3/30/2010 9:55:06 45.5 < 0.01 0.03 3.79 < 0.5 91.9% 365 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000116.LAB 3/30/2010 9:55:14 45.8 < 0.01 0.02 3.80 < 0.5 92.5% 372 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000117.LAB 3/30/2010 9:55:21 45.7 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 92.1% 380 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000118.LAB 3/30/2010 9:55:29 45.9 0.01 0.02 3.79 < 0.5 92.6% 388 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000119.LAB 3/30/2010 9:55:37 45.7 0.01 0.03 3.79 < 0.5 92.2% 396 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000120.LAB 3/30/2010 9:55:45 45.7 0.01 < 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 92.1% 404 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000121.LAB 3/30/2010 9:55:53 45.6 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.80 < 0.5 92.0% 412 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000122.LAB 3/30/2010 9:56:01 45.8 < 0.01 0.02 3.80 < 0.5 92.4% 419 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000123.LAB 3/30/2010 9:56:08 45.7 0.03 0.03 3.79 < 0.5 92.3% 427 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000124.LAB 3/30/2010 9:56:16 45.9 0.02 < 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 92.6% 435 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000125.LAB 3/30/2010 9:56:24 46.1 0.01 < 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 93.0% 443 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000126.LAB 3/30/2010 9:56:32 46.0 0.02 < 0.01 3.80 < 0.5 92.8% 451 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000127.LAB 3/30/2010 9:56:40 45.9 0.02 0.01 3.80 < 0.5 92.7% 459 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000128.LAB 3/30/2010 9:56:48 46.0 < 0.01 0.03 3.80 < 0.5 92.9% 466 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000129.LAB 3/30/2010 9:56:56 46.0 < 0.01 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 92.7% 474 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000130.LAB 3/30/2010 9:57:03 45.9 < 0.01 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 92.6% 482 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000131.LAB 3/30/2010 9:57:11 45.9 0.03 0.03 3.80 < 0.5 92.5% 490 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000132.LAB 3/30/2010 9:57:19 46.0 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.80 < 0.5 92.8% 498 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000133.LAB 3/30/2010 9:57:27 45.9 0.02 0.03 3.79 < 0.5 92.7% 506 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000134.LAB 3/30/2010 9:57:35 46.0 0.02 0.04 3.80 < 0.5 92.9% 513 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000135.LAB 3/30/2010 9:57:42 45.9 < 0.01 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 92.6% 521

49 9 HCL SYS RT 000136 LAB

. _ _ _ _ . 3/30/2010 9:57:50 9 : 46 1

. 0 0

. 1 0 0

. 2 3 7

. 9 < 0 5

. 93 1%

. 529 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000137.LAB 3/30/2010 9:57:58 46.2 < 0.01 0.03 3.79 < 0.5 93.2% 537 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000138.LAB 3/30/2010 9:58:06 46.2 0.03 0.03 3.80 < 0.5 93.3% 545 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000139.LAB 3/30/2010 9:58:14 46.0 < 0.01 0.02 3.79 < 0.5 92.8% 553 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000140.LAB 3/30/2010 9:58:22 46.3 0.03 < 0.01 3.80 < 0.5 93.5% 561 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000141.LAB 3/30/2010 9:58:29 46.3 < 0.01 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 93.3% 568 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000142.LAB 3/30/2010 9:58:37 46.2 0.03 0.02 3.79 < 0.5 93.3% 576 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000143.LAB 3/30/2010 9:58:45 46.4 0.02 < 0.01 3.80 < 0.5 93.6% 584 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000144.LAB 3/30/2010 9:58:53 46.0 0.03 0.01 3.80 < 0.5 92.9% 592 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000145.LAB 3/30/2010 9:59:01 46.3 < 0.01 0.03 3.80 < 0.5 93.4% 600 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000146.LAB 3/30/2010 9:59:09 46.2 < 0.01 0.02 3.79 < 0.5 93.2% 608 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000147.LAB 3/30/2010 9:59:17 46.3 0.02 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 93.4% 615 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000148.LAB 3/30/2010 9:59:24 46.3 < 0.01 0.04 3.80 < 0.5 93.5% 623 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000149.LAB 3/30/2010 9:59:32 46.4 0.01 < 0.01 3.80 < 0.5 93.6% 631 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000150.LAB 3/30/2010 9:59:40 46.5 < 0.01 0.06 3.79 < 0.5 93.8% 639 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000151.LAB 3/30/2010 9:59:48 46.5 < 0.01 0.02 3.79 < 0.5 93.7% 647 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000152.LAB 3/30/2010 9:59:56 46.5 0.01 < 0.01 3.80 < 0.5 93.8% 655 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000153.LAB 3/30/2010 10:00:04 46.5 0.02 0.02 3.80 < 0.5 93.8% 662 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000154.LAB 3/30/2010 10:00:11 46.6 0.02 < 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 93.9% 670 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000155.LAB 3/30/2010 10:00:19 46.5 < 0.01 0.02 3.80 < 0.5 93.8% 678 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000156.LAB 3/30/2010 10:00:27 46.6 0.01 0.02 3.80 < 0.5 93.9% 686 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000157.LAB 3/30/2010 10:00:35 46.4 0.02 0.02 3.80 < 0.5 93.7% 694 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000158.LAB 3/30/2010 10:00:43 46.4 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 93.7% 702 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000159.LAB 3/30/2010 10:00:51 46.6 0.02 0.04 3.79 < 0.5 94.1% 709 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000160.LAB 3/30/2010 10:00:58 46.7 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.80 < 0.5 94.3% 717 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000161.LAB 3/30/2010 10:01:06 46.6 < 0.01 0.03 3.79 < 0.5 93.9% 725 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000162.LAB 3/30/2010 10:01:14 46.7 < 0.01 0.03 3.80 < 0.5 94.3% 733 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000163.LAB 3/30/2010 10:01:22 46.6 0.03 < 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 93.9% 741

### Cal Portland Cement Company, Mojave, CA ‐ FTIR QAQC Data

Prj. # 1663Prj. 1663 49 9 HCL SYS RT 000192 LAB 3/30/2010 10 09 48 1 < < 97 1% 181.1 ppm HCl / 3.88 ppm SF6 System Purge & Response Time Test, Continued

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet) HCl Recovery (%) 

### Response
Time* (sec)
49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000164.LAB 3/30/2010 10:01:30 46.8 0.01 0.02 3.80 < 0.5 94.4% 749 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000165.LAB 3/30/2010 10:01:38 46.6 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 94.1% 756 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000166.LAB 3/30/2010 10:01:45 46.8 < 0.01 0.04 3.79 < 0.5 94.3% 764 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000167.LAB 3/30/2010 10:01:53 46.6 0.03 < 0.01 3.80 < 0.5 94.0% 772 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000168.LAB 3/30/2010 10:02:01 46.6 0.02 0.03 3.79 < 0.5 94.0% 780 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000169.LAB 3/30/2010 10:02:09 46.7 < 0.01 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 94.2% 788 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000170.LAB 3/30/2010 10:02:17 46.8 0.01 < 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 94.5% 796 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000171.LAB 3/30/2010 10:02:25 46.6 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 94.0% 803 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000172.LAB 3/30/2010 10:02:32 46.7 < 0.01 0.03 3.79 < 0.5 94.2% 811 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000173.LAB 3/30/2010 10:02:40 46.8 0.01 < 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 94.5% 819 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000174.LAB 3/30/2010 10:02:48 46.5 < 0.01 0.02 3.80 < 0.5 93.9% 827 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000175.LAB 3/30/2010 10:02:56 46.8 0.02 0.02 3.80 < 0.5 94.5% 835 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000176.LAB 3/30/2010 10:03:04 46.9 0.03 0.04 3.80 < 0.5 94.7% 843 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000177.LAB 3/30/2010 10:03:12 47.0 0.01 < 0.01 3.80 < 0.5 94.8% 850 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000178.LAB 3/30/2010 10:03:19 47.0 < 0.01 0.04 3.79 < 0.5 94.8% 858 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000179.LAB 3/30/2010 10:03:27 47.2 0.03 < 0.01 3.80 < 0.5 95.2% 866 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000180.LAB 3/30/2010 10:03:35 47.7 < 0.01 0.02 3.79 < 0.5 96.2% 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000181.LAB 3/30/2010 10:03:43 47.9 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.80 < 0.5 96.6% 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000182.LAB 3/30/2010 10:03:51 47.9 0.02 0.02 3.80 < 0.5 96.6% 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000183.LAB 3/30/2010 10:03:59 47.7 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 96.2% 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000184.LAB 3/30/2010 10:04:06 47.9 0.02 0.03 3.79 < 0.5 96.6% 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000185.LAB 3/30/2010 10:04:14 47.9 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 96.6% 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000186.LAB 3/30/2010 10:04:22 48.0 < 0.01 0.02 3.80 < 0.5 96.8% 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000187.LAB 3/30/2010 10:04:30 47.8 0.03 0.03 3.79 < 0.5 96.5% 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000188.LAB 3/30/2010 10:04:38 47.8 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 96.4% 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000189.LAB 3/30/2010 10:04:46 47.8 0.04 0.03 3.79 < 0.5 96.5% 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000190.LAB 3/30/2010 10:04:54 47.8 0.01 < 0.01 3.80 < 0.5 96.5% 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000191.LAB 3/30/2010 10:05:01 48.0 0.02 0.02 3.80 < 0.5 96.8%

49 9 HCL SYS RT 000192 LAB

. _ _ _ _ . 3/30/2010 10:05:09 48 1

. 0 0

. 2 < 0 0

. 1 3 8

. 0 < 0 5

. 97 1%

. 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000193.LAB 3/30/2010 10:05:17 48.0 < 0.01 0.02 3.79 < 0.5 96.8% 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000194.LAB 3/30/2010 10:05:25 48.1 0.02 < 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 97.0% 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000195.LAB 3/30/2010 10:05:33 48.0 0.01 < 0.01 3.79 < 0.5 96.9% 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000196.LAB 3/30/2010 10:05:41 47.9 < 0.01 0.03 3.80 < 0.5 96.7% 49.9_HCL_SYS_RT_000197.LAB 3/30/2010 10:05:49 47.8 0.02 0.03 3.80 < 0.5 96.5%

* Response Time = Time to recovery 95% of calibration gas delivered through the sampling system

Main Stack Effluent Prior to HCl Spike #1, Mill On

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
MILL_ON_000236.LAB 3/30/2010 10:17:56 6.3 17.66 9.30 < 0.01 0.7 MILL_ON_000237.LAB 3/30/2010 10:18:27 6.2 17.66 9.35 < 0.01 0.7 Average 6.3 < 0.01

HCl Spike #1 Using 49.56 ppm HCl / 3.80 ppm SF6

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
HCL_SPK1_MILL_ON_000257.LAB 3/30/2010 10:26:43 8.3 16.28 8.76 0.19 < 0.5 HCL_SPK1_MILL_ON_000258.LAB 3/30/2010 10:26:59 7.9 16.30 8.72 0.18 0.6 HCL_SPK1_MILL_ON_000259.LAB 3/30/2010 10:27:14 7.5 16.06 8.61 0.18 0.5 HCL_SPK1_MILL_ON_000260.LAB 3/30/2010 10:27:30 7.4 16.17 8.72 0.18 < 0.5 HCL_SPK1_MILL_ON_000261.LAB 3/30/2010 10:27:46 7.2 16.27 8.77 0.18 0.6 HCL_SPK1_MILL_ON_000262.LAB 3/30/2010 10:28:01 7.3 16.16 8.76 0.17 0.6 Average 7.6 0.18

### Cal Portland Cement Company, Mojave, CA ‐ FTIR QAQC Data

Prj. # 1663Prj. 1663 Main Stack Effluent Post HCl Spike #1, Mill On

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
MILL_ON_000263.LAB 3/30/2010 10:28:57 6.2 17.37 9.42 < 0.01 0.7 MILL_ON_000264.LAB 3/30/2010 10:29:28 5.7 17.20 9.38 < 0.01 0.6 Average 5.9 < 0.01

Main Stack Effluent Prior to HCl Spike #2, Mill On

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
MILL_ON_R1_000326.LAB 3/30/2010 11:29:20 5.9 17.37 8.36 < 0.01 0.7 MILL_ON_R1_000327.LAB 3/30/2010 11:30:19 5.8 17.39 8.29 < 0.01 0.7 Average 5.9 < 0.01

HCl Spike #2 Using 49.56 ppm HCl / 3.80 ppm SF6

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
HCL_SPK2_MILL_ON_000344.LAB 3/30/2010 11:42:00 8.6 15.41 7.33 0.34 < 0.5 HCL_SPK2_MILL_ON_000345.LAB 3/30/2010 11:42:31 8.8 15.57 7.42 0.34 < 0.5 HCL_SPK2_MILL_ON_000346.LAB 3/30/2010 11:43:03 8.7 15.46 7.41 0.34 < 0.5 HCL_SPK2_MILL_ON_000347.LAB 3/30/2010 11:43:34 8.8 15.60 7.45 0.35 < 0.5 HCL_SPK2_MILL_ON_000348.LAB 3/30/2010 11:44:06 8.8 15.53 7.43 0.35 < 0.5 Average 8.8 0.34

Main Stack Effluent Post HCl Spike #2, Mill On

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
MILL_ON_000354.LAB 3/30/2010 11:50:43 5.8 17.32 8.54 < 0.01 0.7 MILL_ON_000355.LAB 3/30/2010 11:51:42 5.7 17.35 8.48 < 0.01 0.8 Average 5.8 < 0.01

Nitro g en S Pur Nitrogen ystem ge

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
N2_SYS_000356.LAB 3/30/2010 11:59:46 0.2 0.02 0.03 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_SYS_000357.LAB 3/30/2010 12:00:02 < 0.2 0.02 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_SYS_000358.LAB 3/30/2010 12:00:18 0.2 0.01 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.5

Main Stack Effluent Prior to HCl Spike #3, Mill On

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
MILL_ON_R2_000420.LAB 3/30/2010 13:05:29 6.5 17.50 8.06 < 0.01 0.7 MILL_ON_R2_000421.LAB 3/30/2010 13:06:27 6.9 17.54 8.13 < 0.01 0.6 Average 6.7 < 0.01

HCl Spike #3 Using 49.56 ppm HCl / 3.80 ppm SF6

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
HCL_SPK3_MILL_ON_000437.LAB 3/30/2010 13:16:57 8.3 16.54 7.71 0.15 < 0.5 HCL_SPK3_MILL_ON_000438.LAB 3/30/2010 13:17:28 8.4 16.69 7.87 0.13 < 0.5 HCL_SPK3_MILL_ON_000439.LAB 3/30/2010 13:18:00 7.9 16.95 7.89 0.11 0.6 HCL_SPK3_MILL_ON_000440.LAB 3/30/2010 13:18:31 7.9 16.57 7.76 0.16 < 0.5 HCL_SPK3_MILL_ON_000441.LAB 3/30/2010 13:19:02 7.8 16.48 7.72 0.15 < 0.5 HCL_SPK3_MILL_ON_000442.LAB 3/30/2010 13:19:34 7.6 16.53 7.70 0.15 < 0.5 Average 8.0 0.14

### Cal Portland Cement Company, Mojave, CA ‐ FTIR QAQC Data

Prj. # 1663Prj. 1663 HCL SPK4 MILL ON 000551 15:01:17 1 16 53 28 6 Main Stack Effluent Post HCl Spike #3 Mill On

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
MILL_ON_000448.LAB 3/30/2010 13:25:57 6.4 17.62 8.18 < 0.01 0.8 MILL_ON_000449.LAB 3/30/2010 13:26:55 6.3 17.45 8.08 < 0.01 0.7 Average 6.3 < 0.01

Nitrogen System Purge

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
N2_SYS_000450.LAB 3/30/2010 13:32:12 0.2 0.03 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_SYS_000451.LAB 3/30/2010 13:32:28 0.2 0.02 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_SYS_000452.LAB 3/30/2010 13:32:44 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_SYS_000453.LAB 3/30/2010 13:32:59 < 0.2 0.02 0.04 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_SYS_000454.LAB 3/30/2010 13:33:15 0.2 < 0.01 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_SYS_000455.LAB 3/30/2010 13:33:31 < 0.2 < 0.01 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.5

Main Stack Effluent Prior to HCl Spike #4, Mill On

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
MILL_ON_R3_000517.LAB 3/30/2010 14:39:59 6.1 17.65 8.30 < 0.01 0.9 MILL_ON_R3_000518.LAB 3/30/2010 14:40:58 6.1 17.50 8.34 < 0.01 0.9 Average 6.1 < 0.01

HCl Spike #4 Using 49.56 ppm HCl / 3.80 ppm SF6

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
HCL_SPK4_MILL_ON_000547.LAB 3/30/2010 14:59:12 8.2 15.99 7.56 0.28 0.6 HCL_SPK4_MILL_ON_000548.LAB 3/30/2010 14:59:43 8.2 16.15 7.59 0.28 0.7 HCL_SPK4_MILL_ON_000549.LAB 3/30/2010 15:00:15 8.0 15.90 7.50 0.28 0.8 HCL_SPK4_MILL_ON_000550.LAB 3/30/2010 15:00:46 8.0 15.96 7.47 0.28 0.6

HCL SPK4 MILL ON 000551.LAB
_ _ _ _ . LAB 3 / 30 / 2010 3/30/2010 15:01:17 .1 8 16.02 .53 7 .28 0 .6 0 Average 8.1 0.28

Nitrogen System Purge

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
N2_SYS_000552.LAB 3/30/2010 15:07:32 0.3 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_SYS_000553.LAB 3/30/2010 15:08:03 0.2 < 0.01 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_SYS_000554.LAB 3/30/2010 15:08:34 < 0.2 0.02 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.5

CTS, 100.0 ppm Ethylene System Purge

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet) Ethylene Recovery (%)
100.0_CTS_SYS_000555.LAB 3/30/2010 15:11:23 < 0.2 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.01 98.0 98.0% 100.0_CTS_SYS_000556.LAB 3/30/2010 15:11:31 < 0.2 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.01 98.4 98.4% 100.0_CTS_SYS_000557.LAB 3/30/2010 15:11:38 < 0.2 0.01 0.01 < 0.01 98.4 98.4% 100.0_CTS_SYS_000558.LAB 3/30/2010 15:11:46 < 0.2 < 0.01 0.01 < 0.01 98.2 98.2% 100.0_CTS_SYS_000559.LAB 3/30/2010 15:11:54 < 0.2 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 98.5 98.5% 100.0_CTS_SYS_000560.LAB 3/30/2010 15:12:02 < 0.2 0.01 0.03 < 0.01 98.3 98.3%



### Nitrogen Direct

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
N2_DIR_000561.LAB 3/31/2010 6:25:30 < 0.2 0.01 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_DIR_000562.LAB 3/31/2010 6:26:02 < 0.2 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_DIR_000563.LAB 3/31/2010 6:26:33 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_DIR_000564BKG.LAB 3/31/2010 6:27:54 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_DIR_000565.LAB 3/31/2010 6:28:29 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5

### Cal Portland Cement Company, Mojave, CA ‐ FTIR QAQC Data

Prj. # 1663Prj. 1663 HCL CO2 H2O SF6 Ethylene Ethylene 

### Response CTS, 100.0 ppm Ethylene Direct Purge

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet) Ethylene Recovery (%)
100.0_CTS_DIR_000566.LAB 3/31/2010 6:30:59 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 98.5 98.5% 100.0_CTS_DIR_000567.LAB 3/31/2010 6:31:07 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 98.3 98.3% 100.0_CTS_DIR_000568.LAB 3/31/2010 6:31:15 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 98.4 98.4% 100.0_CTS_DIR_000569.LAB 3/31/2010 6:31:22 < 0.2 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 98.3 98.3% 100.0_CTS_DIR_000570.LAB 3/31/2010 6:31:30 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 97.9 97.9%

49.56 ppm HCl / 3.80 ppm SF6 Direct Purge

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
49.56_HCL_DIR_000571.LAB 3/31/2010 6:34:55 46.3 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.86 < 0.5 49.56_HCL_DIR_000572.LAB 3/31/2010 6:35:10 46.3 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.86 < 0.5 49.56_HCL_DIR_000573.LAB 3/31/2010 6:35:26 46.3 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.87 < 0.5 49.56_HCL_DIR_000574.LAB 3/31/2010 6:35:42 46.5 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.86 < 0.5 49.56_HCL_DIR_000575.LAB 3/31/2010 6:35:57 46.6 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.86 < 0.5 49.56_HCL_DIR_000576.LAB 3/31/2010 6:36:13 46.7 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.87 < 0.5 49.56_HCL_DIR_000577.LAB 3/31/2010 6:36:29 46.7 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.87 < 0.5 49.56_HCL_DIR_000578.LAB 3/31/2010 6:36:44 46.9 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.87 < 0.5 49.56_HCL_DIR_000579.LAB 3/31/2010 6:37:00 46.8 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.87 < 0.5 49.56_HCL_DIR_000580.LAB 3/31/2010 6:37:16 46.9 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.87 < 0.5

Nitrogen System Purge

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
N2_SYS_000581.LAB 3/31/2010 6:42:49 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_SYS_000582.LAB 3/31/2010 6:43:21 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_SYS_000583.LAB 3/31/2010 6:43:52 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5

CTS, 100.0 ppm Ethylene System Purge and Response Time Test

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet) Ethylene Recovery (%) 

### Response
Time* (sec)
100.0_CTS_SYS_RT_000590.LAB 3/31/2010 6:47:17 0.3 0.02 0.60 < 0.01 < 0.5 0.0% 4 100.0_CTS_SYS_RT_000591.LAB 3/31/2010 6:47:21 0.4 < 0.01 0.42 < 0.01 37.7 37.7% 8 100.0_CTS_SYS_RT_000592.LAB 3/31/2010 6:47:25 < 0.2 < 0.01 0.04 < 0.01 92.5 92.5% 12 100.0_CTS_SYS_RT_000593.LAB 3/31/2010 6:47:29 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 96.9 96.9% 16 100.0_CTS_SYS_RT_000594.LAB 3/31/2010 6:47:33 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 97.7 97.7% 100.0_CTS_SYS_RT_000595.LAB 3/31/2010 6:47:37 < 0.2 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.01 97.8 97.8% 100.0_CTS_SYS_RT_000596.LAB 3/31/2010 6:47:40 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 97.2 97.2% 100.0_CTS_SYS_RT_000597.LAB 3/31/2010 6:47:44 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 96.9 96.9% 100.0_CTS_SYS_RT_000598.LAB 3/31/2010 6:47:48 < 0.2 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 98.3 98.3% 100.0_CTS_SYS_RT_000599.LAB 3/31/2010 6:47:52 < 0.2 0.04 0.03 < 0.01 98.4 98.4% 100.0_CTS_SYS_RT_000600.LAB 3/31/2010 6:47:56 < 0.2 < 0.01 0.01 < 0.01 98.0 98.0%

Main Stack Effluent Prior to HCl Spike #5, Mill Off

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
MILL_OFF_000613.LAB 3/31/2010 7:01:00 48.8 18.27 4.03 < 0.01 1.6 MILL_OFF_000614.LAB 3/31/2010 7:01:31 49.0 18.39 4.03 < 0.01 1.8 Average 48.8 < 0.01

### Cal Portland Cement Company, Mojave, CA ‐ FTIR QAQC Data

Prj. # 1663Prj. 1663 MILL OFF R4 000700 8:19:43 60 21 51 < 01 1 181.1 ppm HCl / 3.88 ppm SF6 System Purge

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet) HCl Recovery (%)
181.1_HCL_SYS_000615.LAB 3/31/2010 7:07:30 173.3 0.01 < 0.01 3.81 < 0.5 95.7% 181.1_HCL_SYS_000616.LAB 3/31/2010 7:07:46 173.8 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.81 < 0.5 96.0% 181.1_HCL_SYS_000617.LAB 3/31/2010 7:08:02 174.1 < 0.01 0.02 3.81 < 0.5 96.1% 181.1_HCL_SYS_000618.LAB 3/31/2010 7:08:17 174.4 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.81 < 0.5 96.3% 181.1_HCL_SYS_000619.LAB 3/31/2010 7:08:33 174.6 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.81 < 0.5 96.4%

HCl Spike #5 Using 181.1 ppm HCl / 3.88 ppm SF6

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
HCL_SPK1_MILL_OFF_000621.LAB 3/31/2010 7:12:49 59.7 16.69 3.68 0.27 1.4 HCL_SPK1_MILL_OFF_000622.LAB 3/31/2010 7:13:05 58.9 16.52 3.66 0.27 1.3 HCL_SPK1_MILL_OFF_000623.LAB 3/31/2010 7:13:20 58.2 16.49 3.60 0.26 1.4 HCL_SPK1_MILL_OFF_000624.LAB 3/31/2010 7:13:36 58.5 16.69 3.64 0.26 1.3 HCL_SPK1_MILL_OFF_000625.LAB 3/31/2010 7:13:52 58.4 16.50 3.65 0.26 1.3 Average 58.7 0.26

Main Stack Effluent Post HCl Spike #2, Mill On

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
MILL_OFF_000626.LAB 3/31/2010 7:15:25 52.1 18.44 4.01 < 0.01 1.7 MILL_OFF_000627.LAB 3/31/2010 7:15:41 52.2 18.43 4.02 < 0.01 1.7 MILL_OFF_000628.LAB 3/31/2010 7:15:56 51.5 18.16 3.97 < 0.01 1.8 MILL_OFF_000629.LAB 3/31/2010 7:16:12 50.9 18.18 3.96 < 0.01 1.8 Average 51.7 < 0.01

Main Stack Effluent Prior to HCl Spike #6, Mill Off

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)

MILL OFF R4 000700.LAB
_ _ _ . LAB 3 / 31 / 2010 /31/2010 8:19:43 60.8 21.47 .51 4 < 0.01 .1 2 MILL_OFF_R4_000701.LAB 3/31/2010 8:20:42 61.9 21.73 4.56 < 0.01 2.2 Average 61.3 < 0.01

HCl Spike #6 Using 181.1 ppm HCl / 3.88 ppm SF6

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
HCL_SPK2_MILL_OFF_000710.LAB 3/31/2010 8:27:56 65.8 19.32 4.10 0.27 1.8 HCL_SPK2_MILL_OFF_000711.LAB 3/31/2010 8:28:27 66.6 19.72 4.15 0.26 1.8 HCL_SPK2_MILL_OFF_000712.LAB 3/31/2010 8:28:58 66.2 19.63 4.12 0.26 1.7 HCL_SPK2_MILL_OFF_000713.LAB 3/31/2010 8:29:30 66.4 19.42 4.08 0.26 1.7 HCL_SPK2_MILL_OFF_000714.LAB 3/31/2010 8:30:01 66.5 19.57 4.08 0.27 1.7 Average 66.3 0.27

Nitrogen System Purge

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
N2_SYS_000715.LAB 3/31/2010 8:37:21 4.9 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_SYS_000716.LAB 3/31/2010 8:37:52 4.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_SYS_000717.LAB 3/31/2010 8:38:24 3.4 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_SYS_000718.LAB 3/31/2010 8:38:55 3.1 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5

### Cal Portland Cement Company, Mojave, CA ‐ FTIR QAQC Data

Prj. # 1663Prj. 1663 Main Stack Effluent Prior to HCl Spike #8
, Mill Off Nitrogen System Purge

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
N2_SYS_000773.LAB 3/31/2010 13:21:24 2.5 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_SYS_000774.LAB 3/31/2010 13:21:56 2.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_SYS_000775.LAB 3/31/2010 13:22:27 2.1 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_SYS_000776.LAB 3/31/2010 13:22:58 1.9 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5

Main Stack Effluent Prior to HCl Spike #7, Mill Off

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
MILL_OFF_R5_000837.LAB 3/31/2010 14:35:05 63.4 16.88 3.73 < 0.01 1.1 MILL_OFF_R5_000838.LAB 3/31/2010 14:36:03 63.1 16.91 3.73 < 0.01 1.2 Average 63.2 < 0.01

HCl Spike #7 Using 181.1 ppm HCl / 3.88 ppm SF6

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
HCL_SPK3_MILL_OFF_000851.LAB 3/31/2010 14:46:17 69.0 15.68 3.56 0.30 0.8 HCL_SPK3_MILL_OFF_000852.LAB 3/31/2010 14:46:48 69.3 16.01 3.59 0.30 0.9 HCL_SPK3_MILL_OFF_000853.LAB 3/31/2010 14:47:20 69.0 15.95 3.58 0.30 0.8 HCL_SPK3_MILL_OFF_000854.LAB 3/31/2010 14:47:51 68.9 15.94 3.59 0.30 0.9 HCL_SPK3_MILL_OFF_000855.LAB 3/31/2010 14:48:22 69.6 16.01 3.61 0.30 0.9 Average 69.1 0.30

Nitrogen System Purge

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
N2_SYS_000856.LAB 3/31/2010 14:51:40 3.3 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_SYS_000857.LAB 3/31/2010 14:52:11 2.8 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5

Main Stack Effluent Prior to HCl Spike #8, Mill Off

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
MILL_OFF_R6_000918.LAB 3/31/2010 15:53:41 71.6 19.90 4.23 < 0.01 1.6 MILL_OFF_R6_000919.LAB 3/31/2010 15:54:40 71.1 20.14 4.28 < 0.01 1.5 Average 71.3 < 0.01

HCl Spike #8 Using 181.1 ppm HCl / 3.88 ppm SF6

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
HCL_SPK4_MILL_OFF_000922.LAB 3/31/2010 15:59:29 78.4 17.86 3.83 0.34 1.1 HCL_SPK4_MILL_OFF_000923.LAB 3/31/2010 16:00:01 78.6 17.88 3.82 0.34 1.1 HCL_SPK4_MILL_OFF_000924.LAB 3/31/2010 16:00:32 79.1 17.97 3.81 0.34 1.1 HCL_SPK4_MILL_OFF_000925.LAB 3/31/2010 16:01:03 78.5 17.83 3.79 0.34 1.2 HCL_SPK4_MILL_OFF_000926.LAB 3/31/2010 16:01:35 79.3 17.86 3.84 0.34 1.0 Average 78.8 0.34

Nitrogen System Purge

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
N2_SYS_000927.LAB 3/31/2010 16:06:08 2.7 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_SYS_000928.LAB 3/31/2010 16:06:39 2.3 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5

### Cal Portland Cement Company, Mojave, CA ‐ FTIR QAQC Data

CTS, 100.0 ppm Ethylene System Purge

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet) Ethylene Recovery (%)
100.0_CTS_SYS_000929.LAB 3/31/2010 16:08:16 1.9 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 98.0 98.0% 100.0_CTS_SYS_000930.LAB 3/31/2010 16:08:23 1.8 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 98.0 98.0% 100.0_CTS_SYS_000931.LAB 3/31/2010 16:08:31 1.7 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 98.8 98.8% 100.0_CTS_SYS_000932.LAB 3/31/2010 16:08:39 1.7 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 98.2 98.2% 100.0_CTS_SYS_000933.LAB 3/31/2010 16:08:47 1.5 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 98.6 98.6%



### Nitrogen Direct

Spectrum Date Time HCL (ppmv wet) CO2 (%v wet) H2O (%v) SF6 (ppmv wet) Ethylene (ppmv wet)
N2_DIR_000934.LAB 3/31/2010 16:23:26 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_DIR_000935.LAB 3/31/2010 16:24:29 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_DIR_000936.LAB 3/31/2010 16:25:32 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5 N2_DIR_000937.LAB 3/31/2010 16:26:34 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.5



### Prj. # 1663Prj. 1663

# APPENDIX

Analyte Spike SummaryCalPortland,Mojave,CA‐MainStackFTIRSpikingSummary=SourceHClSpike#DateEBeffluentHClforeSpikeEffluAfteentHrSpikCleSF6(Dir)SF(Di6l)DFHCl(Dir)HCl(Exp)HCl(Obs)%HClRecoveryMain Stack, Mill On1 3/30/20106.35.93.80 0.180.047149.5 8.1 7.6 93.5%Main Stack, Mill On2 3/30/20105.95.83.80 0.340.090849.5 9.8 8.8 89.5%Main Stack, Mill On3 3/30/20106.76.33.80 0.140.037049.5 8.1 8.0 98.5%Main Stack, Mill On4 3/30/20106.1-3.80 0.280.073349.5 9.0 8.1 90.2%SourceHClSpike#DateEBeffluentHClforeSpikeEffluAfteentHrSpikCleSF6(Dir)SF(Di6l)DFHCl(Dir)HCl(pHCl(Obs)ΔHCl(ppm)%HClRecoverySpikedpm)Main Stack, Mill Off5 3/31/201048.851.73.880.26 0.0679181.1158.7 11.9 96.7%2.3Main Stack, Mill Off6 3/31/201061.3-3.88 0.27 0.0683181.1166.3 9.2 74.2%2.4Main Stack, Mill Off7 3/31/201063.2-3.88 0.30 0.0766181.1169.1 10.8 77.6%3.9Main Stack, Mill Off8 3/31/201071.3-3.88 0.34 0.0872181.1178.8 13.7 86.4%5.8KeyDir = Direct Concentration of Calibration GasDil=DilutConcentrationofCalibrationGsedConcentaDF = Dilution FactorExp = Expected Spike ConcentrationObs = Observed Spike Concentrationprj#1663

# APPENDIX

Gas Certificates and Field Notes

# CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Grade of Product: PRIMARY STANDARD

Customer: LANSING

Part Number: X02NI99P15AD524 Reference Number: 32-112616961-1 Cylinder Number: SG9196919 Cylinder Volume: 144 Cu.Ft. Laboratory: MIC - Royal Oak - MI Cylinder Pressure: 2015 PSIG Analysis Date: Dec 04, 2007 Valve Outlet: 350

Product directly traceable to NIST ASTM Class 1 weights and/or NIST gas mixture reference materials.



# ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Component Requested Actual Concentration Analytical

Concentration (Mole %) 

### Uncertainity

ETHYLENE 100.0 PPM 100.0 PPM +/- 1%

NITROGEN Balance



### Notes:



## Signature on file

____________________________________ QA Approval

Page 1 of 32-112616961-1

# CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Grade of Product: CERTIFIED STANDARD-SPEC

Customer: PRISM ANALYTICAL

Part Number: X03NI99C15A11P5 Reference Number: 82-124209097-1 Cylinder Number: CC316663 Cylinder Volume: 140.0 Cubic Feet Laboratory: ASG - Riverton - NJ Cylinder Pressure: 2015 PSIG Analysis Date: Mar 01, 2010 Valve Outlet: 330

Product composition verified by direct comparison to calibration standards traceable to NIST ASTM Class 1 weights and/or NIST gas mixture reference materials.



# ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Component Requested Actual Concentration Analytical

Concentration (Mole %) 

### Uncertainty

SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE 4.000 PPM 4.120 PPM +/- 5%

HYDROGEN CHLORIDE 50.00 PPM 49.56 PPM +/- 2%

NITROGEN Balance



### Notes:



## Signature on file

____________________________________ Approved for Release

Page 1 of 82-124209097-1

# CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Grade of Product: CERTIFIED STANDARD-SPEC

Part Number: X03NI99C15A6188 Reference Number: 82-124175033-1 Cylinder Number: CC281398 Cylinder Volume: 144 Cu.Ft. Laboratory: ASG - Riverton - NJ Cylinder Pressure: 2000 PSIG Analysis Date: Apr 30, 2009 Valve Outlet: 330

Product composition verified by direct comparison to calibration standards traceable to NIST ASTM Class 1 weights and/or NIST gas mixture reference materials.



# ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Component Requested Actual Concentration Analytical

Concentration (Mole %) 

### Uncertainty

SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE 4.000 PPM 4.110 PPM +/- 5%

HYDROGEN CHLORIDE 200.0 PPM 206.5 PPM +/- 2%

NITROGEN Balance



### Notes:



## Signature on file

____________________________________ QA Approval

Page 1 of 82-124175033-1

# APPENDIX

US EPA Method 321 Calculations

### prism analytical technologies, inc.



# Calculations - Method 321, Low Moisture Sa mple Stream

Estimating Noise Levels (Appe ndix C Addendum to Method 320/ Method 321)

RMS EST 

# = RMS MAN 

# TP (t ss 

# /t MAN 

# ) 1⁄2 

## (C.1, Method 320, 321)



# tss = 64 sec (64 scans) signal integration period – sample spectra



# t MAN 

# = 32sec (32 scans) manufacturer’s signa l integration time



# TP = 6/10 = 0.6 manufacturer’s estimat e of the fraction of the total infrared power transmitted by the adsorption cell and transfer optics from the interferometer to the detector



# RMS MAN 

# = 0.000025 root-mean-square noise level of the system, without the absorption cell and transfer optics, unde r those conditions necessary to yield th e specified minimum instrumental linewidth



# RMS EST 

# = (0.000025) (0.6) (72/36) 1⁄2



# RMS EST 

# = 0.0000212 abs

### prism analytical technologies, inc.



# Calculations - Method 321, Low Moisture Sa mple Stream

Estimating Minimum Concentration M easurement Uncertainties (MAU and MIU) (Appendix D Addendum to Method 320/Method 321)

MAU (Measurement uncertainty – analyte) MIU (Measurement uncertainty – interferant)

MAU im 

# = (RMS)(DL i 

# )(AU i 

# ) [(FU
m 

# -FL m 

# )/AAI im 

# ] (D.1, Method 320, 321)



# Set RMS = RMS EST



# RMS = 2.12 x 10 -5 

## root-mean-square



# DL i 

# = 0.2 required detection limit



# AU i 

# = 0.2 analytical uncertainty limit



# FU m 

# = 2885 upper wavenumber position



# FL m 

# = 2580 lower wavenumber position



# AAI im 

# = 0.6859 band area of the analyte



# MAU im 

# = (2.12x10 -5 

# )(0.2)(0.2) [(2885-2580)/0.6859]

MAU im 

# = 0.00038 = MIU

## 11 APPENDIX B
METHOD 3A DATA FOR OXYGEN

# CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Grade of Product: CERTIFIED STANDARD-SPEC

Customer: MT PLEASANT

Part Number: X03NI78C15A12C6 Reference Number: 32-112042779-1 Cylinder Number: SG9151452BAL Cylinder Volume: 152.2 CF Laboratory: MIC - Royal Oak-32 - MI Cylinder Pressure: 2015 PSIG Analysis Date: Mar 12, 2010 Valve Outlet: 590

Product composition verified by direct comparison to calibration standards traceable to NIST ASTM Class 1 weights and/or NIST gas mixture reference materials.



# ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Component Requested Actual Concentration Analytical

Concentration (Mole %) 

### Uncertainty

OXYGEN 10.00 % 10.01 % +/- 2%

CARBON DIOXIDE 12.00 % 11.98 % +/- 2%

NITROGEN Balance



### Notes:



## Signature on file

____________________________________ Approved for Release

Page 1 of 32-112042779-1

### Oxygen Analyzer Readout

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3
Date 3/30/2010 3/30/2010 3/30/2010
Run Time 10:30-11:30 Run Time 12:05-13:05 Run Time 13:40-14:40
Clock Time O2 Value % Clock Time O2 Value % Clock Time O2 Value %
10:30 13.12 12:05 12.75 13:40 12.68
10:40 13.15 12:15 12.83 13:50 12.93
10:50 13.13 12:25 12.97 14:00 13.07
11:00 13.01 12:35 12.98 14:10 12.88
11:10 13.01 12:45 12.88 14:20 13.01
11:20 12.97 12:55 12.79 14:30 12.89
11:30 13.1 13:05 12.91 14:40 12.84 avg. 13.07 12.87 12.90

Run 3 Run 4 Run 5
Date 3/31/2010 3/31/2010 3/31/2010
Run Time 07:20-08:20 Run Time 13:40-14:40 Run Time 14:50-15:50
Clock Time O2 Value % Clock Time O2 Value % Clock Time O2 Value %
7:20 14.50 13:40 12.13 14:50 11.2
7:30 14.70 13:50 12.95 15:00 11.1
7:40 13.10 14:00 12.90 15:10 11.1
7:50 13.10 14:10 12.20 15:20 11.1
8:00 13.10 14:20 12.40 15:30 10.9
8:10 13.10 14:30 12.20 15:40 10.9
8:20 13.10 14:40 12.10 15:50 10.9 avg. 13.53 12.41 11.03CalPortland - Method 3A Results and QA CalculationsMojave, CAOxygenCAI Model600PInstrument Span 25User InputCal Gases Cylinder IDZero 0.00 N2 - UHPMid 10.01 AirGas - SG9151452BALHigh 20.9 Ambient AirPRE-TESTAnalyzer Calibration Error - Direct Instrument CalibrationTag Value Analyzer Response Absolute Difference % of Differnce from Span ±2% = passZero Gas 0.00 -0.28 -0.28 -1.1% passMid - Range 10.01 10.22 0.21 0.8% passHigh - Range 20.92 21.15 0.23 0.9% passSampling System Bias - System CalibrationDirect Cal Analyzer Response Absolute Difference % of Diffrence from Span ±5% = passZero Gas -0.28 0.30 0.58 2.3% passMid - Range 10.22 10.60 0.38 1.5% passHigh - Range 21.15 21.06 -0.09 -0.4% passCalPortland - Method 3A Results and QA CalculationsMojave, CAPost Run 1Zero and Calibration Drift -Select either mid or high whichever closest to effluent concentrationDirect Cal Analyzer Response Absolute Difference % of Diffrence from Span ±3% = passZero Gas -0.28 0.40 0.68 2.7% passMid - Range 10.22 10.60 0.38 1.5%passPost Run 2Zero and Calibration Drift -Select either mid or high whichever closest to effluent concentrationDirect Cal Analyzer Response Absolute Difference % of Diffrence from Span ±3% = passZero Gas -0.28 0.45 0.73 2.9% passMid - Range 10.22 10.90 0.68 2.7% passFinalZero and Calibration Drift -Select either mid or high whichever closest to effluent concentrationDirect Cal Analyzer Response Absolute Difference ±3% = passZero Gas -0.28 0.44 0.72 2.9% passMid - Range 10.22 10.90 0.68 2.7% passCalPortland - Method 3A Results and QA CalculationsMojave, CAMETHOD 3A RESULTSAvg. Analyzer O2Results Drift Corrected ValueRun Times% O2% O2Run 1 13.07 12.42 % 10:30-11:30Run 2 12.87 12.07 % 12:05-13:05Run 3 12.90 11.92 % 13:40-14:40Avg. 12.14CalPortland - Method 3A Results and QA CalculationsMojave, CAOxygenCAI Model600PInstrument Span 25User InputCal Gases Cylinder IDZero 0.00 N2 - UHPMid 10.01 AirGas - SG9151452BALHigh 20.9 Ambient AirPRE-TESTAnalyzer Calibration Error - Direct Instrument CalibrationTag Value Analyzer Response Absolute Difference % of Differnce from Span ±2% = passZero Gas 0.00 0.34 0.34 1.4% passMid - Range 10.01 10.22 0.21 0.8% passHigh - Range 20.92 21.2 0.28 1.1% passSampling System Bias - System CalibrationDirect Cal Analyzer Response Absolute Difference % of Diffrence from Span ±5% = passZero Gas 0.34 1.10 0.76 3.0% passMid - Range 10.22 10.60 0.38 1.5% passHigh - Range 21.2 21.9 0.70 2.8% passCalPortland - Method 3A Results and QA CalculationsMojave, CAPost Run 4Zero and Calibration Drift -Direct Cal Analyzer Response Absolute Difference % of Diffrence from Span ±3% = passZero Gas 0.34 0.12 -0.22 -0.9% passMid - Range 10.22 10.90 0.68 2.7% passPost Run 5Zero and Calibration Drift -Direct Cal Analyzer Response Absolute Difference % of Diffrence from Span ±3% = passZero Gas 0.34 0.09 -0.25 -1.0% passMid - Range 10.22 10.50 0.28 1.1% passFinalZero and Calibration Drift -Select either mid or high whichever closest to effluent concentrationDirect Cal Analyzer Response Absolute Difference ±3% = passZero Gas 0.34 0.09 -0.25 -1.0% passMid - Range 10.22 10.40 0.18 0.7% passCalPortland - Method 3A Results and QA CalculationsMojave, CAMETHOD 3A RESULTSAvg. Analyzer O2Results Drift Corrected ValueRun Times% O2% O2Run 1 13.07 12.30 % 6:45-7:00Run 2 12.41 11.90 % 13:40-14:40Run 3 11.03 10.56 % 14:55-15:5511.59

## 12 APPENDIX C
METHOD 1 AND 2 RESULTS
FOR
EFFLUENT VOLUMETRIC FLOWRATE

### Appendix C - Method 1 Parameters
CalPortland - Method 1 Mojave, CA
Meets EPA M1 criteria

Date 30-Mar-10
Location Stack
Run Time NS

Stack ID Kiln #1 Stack Diameter (ft) 10.54
Cross Sectional Area 87.28 Barometric Pressure " Hg NA
Stack Static Pressure " H 2 

### O NA

Pitot Tube #1 A-1 Pitot Tube Coefficient Cp 0.84

Nipple Length
Port Point Distance Ft Distance In. w/ Nipple 6.50
A - SW 1 0.5 5.6 12.07
2 1.5 18.6 25.10
3 3.1 37.3 43.82
B - SE 4 0.5 5.6 12.07
5 1.5 18.6 25.10
6 3.1 37.3 43.82
C - NE 1 0.5 5.6 12.07
2 1.5 18.6 25.10
3 3.1 37.3 43.82
D - NW 4 0.5 5.6 12.07
5 1.5 18.6 25.10
6 3.1 37.3 43.82

### Appendix C - Method 2 Parameter Data
CalPortland - Method 1 & 2 Mojave, Ca

Date 30-Mar-10
Location Stack
Run Time 10:00-10:15

Stack ID 126.5 inches Stack Diameter (ft) 10.54
Cross Sectional Area 87.28

Pitot Tube Coefficient Cp A-1
Calibration Date 23-Jun-05

Port Point Distance In Angle
A - SW 1 12.07 <10
2 25.10 <10
3 43.82 <10
B - SE 4 12.07 <10
5 25.10 <10
6 43.82 <10
C - NE 1 12.07 <10
2 25.10 <10
3 43.82 <10
D - NW 4 12.07 <10
5 25.10 <10
6 43.82 <10

### CalPortland Effluent Flow Rate Mojave, CA

Date 30-Mar-10 

## RUN 1

Location Stack Level 3
Run Time 10:00-10:15

Stack ID Stack Stack Diameter (ft) 10.54
Cross Sectional Area 87.28 Barometric Pressure " Hg 27.26
Stack Static Pressure " H 2 

### O -1.2

Pitot Tube Coefficient Cp 0.84

Port Point Distance In DP SQRT DP Temp F
A - SW 1 5.57 1.2 1.10 212
2 18.60 1.5 1.22 228
3 37.32 1.5 1.22 231
B - SE 4 5.57 1.2 1.10 205
5 18.60 1.5 1.22 219
6 37.32 1.5 1.22 224
C - NE 1 5.57 1.2 1.10 220
2 18.60 1.3 1.14 200
3 37.32 1.5 1.22 233
D - NW 4 5.57 1.2 1.10 212
5 18.60 1.5 1.22 221
6 37.32 1.5 1.22 225 Average 1.17 219

Ps - abs flue gas pressure 27.17
Stack Gas Moisture Content % 8.2
Wet CO 2 

### (Method 320) 17.5 Dry mole Fraction of flue gas 0.92

Molecular Weight % O 2 

### % CO 2 

### N 2 

### MW
Md Dry 12.42 19.1 68.51 31.55

Ms Wet 30.44

Velocity f/sec 76.4 ACFM 400,280 SCFM Wet 282,623 SCFM Dry 259,448

PPM (v) wet HCl 6.3 tpy 44.4

### CalPortland Effluent Flow Rate Mojave, CA

Date 30-Mar-10 

## RUN 2

Location Stack Level 3
Run Time 11:30-11:45

Stack ID Stack Stack Diameter (ft) 10.54
Cross Sectional Area 87.28 Barometric Pressure " Hg 27.26
Stack Static Pressure " H 2 

### O -1.2

Pitot Tube Coefficient Cp 0.84

Port Point Distance In DP SQRT DP Temp F
A - SW 1 5.57 1.50 1.22 218
2 18.60 1.60 1.26 225
3 37.32 1.30 1.14 226
B - SE 4 5.57 1.30 1.14 225
5 18.60 1.50 1.22 228
6 37.32 1.40 1.18 231
C - NE 1 5.57 1.20 1.10 220
2 18.60 1.40 1.18 220
3 37.32 1.30 1.14 225
D - NW 4 5.57 1.40 1.18 221
5 18.60 1.40 1.18 230
6 37.32 1.50 1.22 369 Average 1.18 230

Ps - abs flue gas pressure 27.17
Stack Gas Moisture Content % 8.2
Wet CO 2 

### (Method 320) 17.5 Dry mole Fraction of flue gas 0.92

Molecular Weight % O 2 

### % CO 2 

### N 2 

### MW
Md Dry 12.07 19.1 68.88 31.53

Ms Wet 30.43

Velocity f/sec 77.6 ACFM 406,175 SCFM Wet 282,283 SCFM Dry 259,249

PPM (v) wet HCl 6.3 tpy 44.3

### CalPortland Effluent Flow Rate Mojave, CA

Date 30-Mar-10 

## RUN 3

Location Stack Level 2
Run Time 13:10-13:25

Stack ID Stack Stack Diameter (ft) 10.54
Cross Sectional Area 87.28 Barometric Pressure " Hg 27.26
Stack Static Pressure " H 2 

### O -1.2

CLC Pitot Tube #1 Pitot Tube Coefficient Cp 0.84

Port Point Distance In DP SQRT DP Temp F
A - SW 1 5.57 1.40 1.18 225
2 18.60 1.50 1.22 230
3 37.32 1.40 1.18 235
B - SE 4 5.57 1.60 1.26 217
5 18.60 1.30 1.14 233
6 37.32 1.40 1.18 232
C - NE 1 5.57 1.30 1.14 230
2 18.60 1.40 1.18 234
3 37.32 1.30 1.14 234
D - NW 4 5.57 1.30 1.14 226
5 18.60 1.40 1.18 232
6 37.32 1.50 1.22 236 Average 1.18 230

Ps - abs flue gas pressure 26.01
Stack Gas Moisture Content % 8.2
Wet CO 2 

### (Method 320) 17.5 Dry mole Fraction of flue gas 0.92

Molecular Weight % O 2 

### % CO 2 

### N 2 

### MW
Md Dry 11.92 19.1 69.01 31.53

Ms Wet 30.41

Velocity f/sec 79.3 ACFM 415,406 SCFM Wet 276,249 SCFM Dry 253,513

PPM (v) wet HCl 5.8 tpy 39.9

### CalPortland Effluent Flow Rate Mojave, CA

Date 31-Mar-10 

## RUN 4

Location Stack Level 3 Run Time 06:45-07:00 Immediately after this run lost power and 5 hour delay

Stack ID Stack Stack Diameter (ft) 10.54
Cross Sectional Area 87.28 Barometric Pressure " Hg 26.90
Stack Static Pressure " H 2 

### O -1.3

Pitot Tube Coefficient Cp 0.84

Port Point Distance In DP SQRT DP Temp F
A - SW 1 5.57 1.10 1.05 350
2 18.60 1.20 1.10 358
3 37.32 1.20 1.10 364
B - SE 4 5.57 1.20 1.10 345
5 18.60 1.10 1.05 352
6 37.32 1.00 1.00 357
C - NE 1 5.57 1.20 1.10 347
2 18.60 1.00 1.00 350
3 37.32 1.10 1.05 358
D - NW 4 5.57 1.20 1.10 350
5 18.60 1.20 1.10 359
6 37.32 1.10 1.05 361 Average 1.06 354

Ps - abs flue gas pressure 26.81
Stack Gas Moisture Content % 4.4
Wet CO 2 

### (Method 320) 20.7 Dry mole Fraction of flue gas 0.96

Molecular Weight % O 2 

### % CO 2 

### N 2 

### MW Md Dry 12.30 21.65 66.05 31.96

Ms Wet 31.34

Velocity f/sec 75.2 ACFM 393,901 SCFM Wet 228,845 SCFM Dry 218,776

HCl Results PPM (v) Wet 57.3

### CalPortland Effluent Flow Rate Mojave, CA

Date 31-Mar-10 

## RUN 5

Location Stack Level 3
Run Time 13:20-13:35

Stack ID Stack Stack Diameter (ft) 10.54
Cross Sectional Area 87.28 Barometric Pressure " Hg 26.90
Stack Static Pressure " H 2 

### O -1.2

Pitot Tube Coefficient Cp 0.84

Port Point Distance In DP SQRT DP Temp F
A - SW 1 5.57 1.00 1.00 394
2 18.60 1.00 1.00 409
3 37.32 1.00 1.00 417
B - SE 4 5.57 0.90 0.95 398
5 18.60 1.00 1.00 411
6 37.32 1.00 1.00 417
C - NE 1 5.57 0.90 0.95 410
2 18.60 1.00 1.00 419
3 37.32 1.00 1.00 421
D - NW 4 5.57 1.00 1.00 401
5 18.60 1.10 1.05 415
6 37.32 1.00 1.00 418 Average 1.00 411

Ps - abs flue gas pressure 26.81
Stack Gas Moisture Content % 4.5
Wet CO 2 

### (Method 320) 15.9 Dry mole Fraction of flue gas 0.96

Molecular Weight % O 2 

### % CO 2 

### N 2 

### MW Md Dry 11.90 16.65 71.45 31.14

Ms Wet 30.55

Velocity f/sec 73.7 ACFM 386,009 SCFM Wet 209,744 SCFM Dry 200,306

HCl Results PPM (v) Wet 66.8

### CalPortland Effluent Flow Rate Mojave, CA

Date 31-Mar-10 

## RUN 6

Location Stack Level 3
Run Time 14:40-14:55

Stack ID Stack Stack Diameter (ft) 10.54
Cross Sectional Area 87.28 Barometric Pressure " Hg 26.90
Stack Static Pressure " H 2 

### O -1.2

Pitot Tube Coefficient Cp 0.84

Port Point Distance In DP SQRT DP Temp F
A - SW 1 5.57 1.00 1.00 404
2 18.60 1.00 1.00 424
3 37.32 1.20 1.10 434
B - SE 4 5.57 1.10 1.05 410
5 18.60 1.10 1.05 425
6 37.32 1.20 1.10 435
C - NE 1 5.57 1.10 1.05 310
2 18.60 1.20 1.10 320
3 37.32 1.20 1.10 435
D - NW 4 5.57 1.20 1.10 435
5 18.60 1.20 1.10 442
6 37.32 1.30 1.14 446 Average 1.07 410

Ps - abs flue gas pressure 26.81
Stack Gas Moisture Content % 4.1
Wet CO 2 

### (Method 320) 18.9 Dry mole Fraction of flue gas 0.96

Molecular Weight % O 2 

### % CO 2 

### N 2 

### MW Md Dry 10.56 19.71 69.73 31.58

Ms Wet 31.02

Velocity f/sec 78.7 ACFM 412,152 SCFM Wet 224,164 SCFM Dry 214,974

HCl Results PPM (v) Wet 68.1