alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# When disaster strikes, what’s in your home, hands and head?

/ Published Sept. 28, 2017
PHILADELPHIA, 
When it comes to planning for disasters, the City of Philadelphia’s Office of Emergency Management encourages people to know what they should have in their homes, their hands and their heads.

**IN THEIR HOMES**

Individuals should maintain the following items in their homes to ensure they’re ready when needed.
      -  Flashlights 
      -  Extra batteries 
      -  Water bottles 
      -  Non-perishable food, such as canned goods, snack bars, freeze-dried fruits and cereal. 
      -  First aid kit 
      -  Copies of your photo IDs 
      -  Copies of lease, mortgage and insurance info 
      -  Portable AM/FM radio 
      -  Assistive equipment with a full charge 

**IN THEIR HANDS**

The following items should be prepared in a back pack, ready to grab during an evacuation.
      -  Extra car and house keys  
      -  Cash  
      -  Batteries 
      -  Back-up power  
      -  Important documents 
      -  Water 
      -  Flash light 
      -  Pen and paper 

**IN THEIR HEADS**

Individuals and families need an action plan in their heads so they don’t have to think under stress.
      -  Prepare a Family Emergency Plan for your home 
      -  Choose two places for your family to meet after an emergency – one right outside your house and one outside your neighborhood 
      -  Draw a rough outline of your home, including exit points 
      -  Share your plan with caregivers, personal support network and your emergency contacts 
      -  Practice your plan. Practice getting to your meeting spot 
      -  Review the plan frequently with your family 
      -  Choose an emergency contact outside the immediate area 

More information, including fillable forms, can be found at https://beta.phila.gov/departments/oem and www.ready.gov.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40649

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OSCAR PIMENTEL-HERNANDEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:07-CR-197-ALL

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Oscar Pimentel-Hernandez

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. UnitedStates, 523

U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision

and not a separate criminal offense. See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492

F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202).

The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment

of the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 5, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
Exhibit
23.1











CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We have
issued our report dated June 18, 2007 accompanying the consolidated financial
statements in the Annual Report of Wayne Savings Bancshares, Inc. (which report
expressed an unqualified opinion and contains an explanatory paragraph relating
to the Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 158 in fiscal 2007) on Form 10-K for the
year ended March 31, 2007.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Wayne Savings
Bancshares, Inc. on Form S-8 (No. 333-105845 effective June 5, 2003) and Form
S-8 (No. 333-119556 effective October 10, 2005).








/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP





Cincinnati,
Ohio


June 26,
2008
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23194]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed During the Week of August 
22, 1997

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C 412 and 414. Answers 
may be filed within 21 days of date of filing.

Docket Number: OST-97-2824
Date Filed: August 18, 1997
Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association
Subject:
    COMP PTC/CTC Telex Mail Vote 887
    Yemen Currency--Passenger/Cargo
    r1--010y r2--010jj
    Telex TW83--Correction
    Intended effective date: September 1, 1997.

Docket Number: OST-97-2826
Date Filed: August 20, 1997
Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association
Subject:
    CBPP/Reso/001 dated July 29, 1997 r-1-r8
    Finally Adopted Resolutions/Recommended Practices
    Minutes--CBPP/Minutes/001 dated June 5, 1997 (summary attached.)
    Intended effective date: October 1, 1997.
Paulette V. Twine,
Chief, Documentary Services.
[FR Doc. 97-23194 Filed 8-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00272-CR

IN RE Ricardo CUMMINGS

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 11, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On April 11, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining of the trial 

court’s failure to rule on various pro se motions. However, counsel has been appointed to 

represent relator in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court for which he is currently 

confined. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Robinson v. State, 

240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1995). A trial court has no legal duty to rule on pro se motions or petitions filed with 

regard to a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is represented by counsel. See Robinson, 

240 S.W.3d at 922. Consequently, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to rule 

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. CM961299, pending in the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, 

Texas, the Honorable Sid L. Harle presiding. 
04-11-00272-CR

- 2 -

on relator’s pro se motions filed in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court. 

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

Additionally, relator filed an Application for Leave to File Petition for Writ of 

Mandamus. No leave is required to file a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. TEX. R.

APP. P. 52. Therefore, relator’s motion for leave to file is DENIED as moot. 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF BALLARD MEDICAL PRODUCTS


                         JURISDICTION OF     BUSINESS       PARENT
        SUBSIDIARY       INCORPORATION       NAME           CORPORATION 

        1194127          Canada              1194127        691555
        Ontario Inc.                         Ontario Inc.   Ontario
                                                            Limited

        691555 Ontario   Canada              Preferred      Ballard
        Limited                              Medical        Medical
                                             Products       Products
                                                            (Canada)
                                                            Inc.

        Ballard          Virgin              Ballard        Ballard
        International,   Islands             International, Medical
        Inc.                                 Inc.           Products

        Ballard          Canada              Ballard        Ballard
        Medical                              Medical        Medical
        Products                             Products       Products
        (Canada)                             (Canada)
        Inc.                                 Inc.

        Ballard          Utah                Ballard        Ballard
        Purchase                             Purchase       Medical
        Corporation                          Cororation     Products

        Ballard          Utah                Ballard        Ballard
        Real Estate                          Real Estate    Medical
        Holdings, Inc.                       Holdings, Inc. Products

        Cardiotronics    Colorado            Cardiotronics  Ballard
        Sytems, Inc.                         Systems, Inc.  Medical
                                                            Products

        Medical          California          Medical        Ballard
        Innovations                          Innovations    Medical
        Corporation                          Corporation    Products

        Mist Assist,     Delaware            Mist Assist,   Ballard
        Inc.                                 Inc.           Medical
                                                            Products

        Plastic          Ohio                Plastic        Ballard
        Engineered                           Engineered     Medical
        Products                             Products       Products
        Company                              Company  

        Preferred        New York            Preferred      691555
        Medical                              Medical        Ontario
        Products, Inc.                       Products       Limited

        R2 Medical       California          R2 Medical     Cardiotronics
        Systems, Inc.                        Systems, Inc.  Systems, Inc.
No. 9548.

#### Hartman et al., Partners, *v.*Bowman

(Decided June 5, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Lucas county.

*Messrs. Kinney, O’Farrell & Rimelspach*and *Mr. H. C. Webster,*for plaintiffs in error.

*510
      *Messrs. Doyle S Lewis*and *Mr. J. W. Schaufelberger,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Crew, Summers and Spear, JJ., concur.
US Oncology, Inc.



EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of US Oncology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Bruce D. Broussard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                 |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                 
|----- |  | --------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|      |  |                 |  | 
|      |  |                 |  | 
|Date: |  | March 12, 2004: |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    BRUCE D. BROUSSARD                                       
|      |  |                 |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                 
|      |  |                 |  |  |  |     |  | Bruce D. Broussard, Chief Financial Officer of US Oncology, Inc.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

JOAN YATSONSKY, : No. 3:15cv1777

Plaintiff :

: (Judge Munley) 

v. :

:

STATE FARM FIRE & :

CASUALTY COMPANY, :

Defendant :

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ORDER

AND NOW, to wit, this 27th day of April 2016, State Farm Fire and

Casualty Company’s motion for judgment on the pleadings regarding

Count I–breach of contract (Doc. 17) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is

directed to enter judgment in favor of State Farm and against Plaintiff

Joan Yatsonsky on Count I-breach of contract.

BY THE COURT:

s/ James M. Munley 

JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY

United States District Court

Case 3:15-cv-01777-JMM Document 25 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 1
# Jones makes inaugural visit to DLA Distribution Red River

/ Published Dec. 11, 2018
TEXARKANA, Texas, 
On Nov. 15-16, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution commander Navy Rear Adm. Kevin M. Jones made his inaugural visit to DLA Distribution Red River, Texas, to meet with key staff members, employees, other local DLA entities and Red River Army Depot commander Army Col. Stephen York.

Upon arrival, Jones received the Red River command brief, presented by DLA Distribution Red River’s commander, Army Lt. Col. Jeffery Chamberlain. In addition to Jones and Chamberlain, attending the brief was DLA Distribution Red River deputy commander, Fred Hildrich, representatives from the Union, DLA Land and Maritime, DLA Disposition Services and DLA Document Services, who are all co-located with Distribution on the Red River Army Depot installation.

Following the briefing, Jones was given a tour of Distribution’s footprint on the installation. 

Coming back to Distribution Red River’s Headquarter building, Jones presented length of service awards to a number of Red River employees. Boyd J. Bomberger, Jr., Steven W. Brookman, Rhonda Cartwright, Catherine Daniel and Anita Dodez received awards for 30 years of service. Kathy Braley, Tammy Gardner, Rick D. McConaughey and Carol J. Wright received awards for 35 years of service. Diana Culberson, Margie Golston and Kathy Nottingham received awards for 40 years of service, and Emmett Thurman, Jr., received an award for 45 years of service. All together, these individuals provided the federal government with a combined total of 455 years of service.

Rounding out his visit, Jones met York and his deputy commander, Patton Tidwell where they provided him with a command brief on Red River Army Depot.
#### Billie MILLER, Appellant, v. Joseph Frederick ANGST, Appellee.

No. 69-407.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 20, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 23**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8No. 333-130177) pertaining to the 2005 Incentive Award Plan of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. of our reports dated February 19, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Trump Entertainment Resorts,Inc., Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc. includedin the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 12, 2007
#### Jane McGrail, appellant, *v.*Francis McGrail, respondent.

On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Green, whose opinion is reported in *3 Dick. Ch. Rep. 532.*

*Mr. Patrick H. Gilhooly,*for the appellant.

*Mr. Foster M. Voorhees,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

An order was entered reversing the decree appealed from. No opinion filed. The order does not indicate'the nature of the decree to be entered in the court of chancery.

*For affirmance*— Dixon, Magie, Clement — 3.

*For reversal*— The Chief-Justice, Depue, Garrison, Reed, Van Syckel, Werts, Bogert, Brown, Krueger, Smith. Whitaker — 11.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive and Acting Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350**

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer of Golden Spirit Enterprises Ltd.  (the "Company"),  hereby certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-QSB of the Company  for  the  quarter end September 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934   and  that  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 16, 2007 

/s/Robert Klein 

Robert Klein

President/Director
FREDERICK S. MARSHALL

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3395

__ ___________________________/

Opinion filed November 14, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Baker County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

.

Frederick S. Marshall, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

P ER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, MARSTILLER, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT FOUND ON PAGE 3 OF THIS PARTNERSHIP'S FORM 10-Q FOR
THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,654
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,654
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 251,466
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              320
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     251,146
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   251,466
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,344
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,344
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47


</TABLE>
#### Johnny CRAIG v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 45324.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 5, 1969.

Murray L. Williams, Water Valley, for appellant.

Joe T. Patterson, Atty. Gen., by G. Garland Lyell, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

_________________________________________ 

 ) 

Application of ) 

 ) 

ACT HAVAYOLLARI A.Ş. ) 

d/b/a ACT AIRLINES ) DOCKET OST-2012- 

 ) 

for a Foreign Air Carrier Permit pursuant ) 

to 49 U.S.C. § 41301 and exemption ) 

authority pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109 ) 

(Turkey-U.S. charter, all-cargo service) ) 

_________________________________________ ) 

MOTION OF ACT HAVAYOLLARI A.Ş. D/B/A 

ACT AIRLINES FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to: 

John R. Mietus, Jr. 

Law Office of John Mietus, LLC 

6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 300 

Bethesda, MD 20817-7500 

(202) 747-5212 - Telephone 

(240) 396-5362 - Fax 

john@mietuslaw.com 

Counsel for ACT HAVAYOLLARI A.Ş. 

d/b/a ACT AIRLINES 

April 3, 2012
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

_________________________________________ 

 ) 

Application of ) 

 ) 

ACT HAVAYOLLARI A.Ş. ) 

d/b/a ACT AIRLINES ) DOCKET OST-2012- 

 ) 

for a Foreign Air Carrier Permit pursuant ) 

to 49 U.S.C. § 41301 and exemption ) 

authority pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109 ) 

(Turkey-U.S. charter, all-cargo service) ) 

_________________________________________ ) 

MOTION OF ACT HAVAYOLLARI A.Ş. D/B/A 

ACT AIRLINES FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

Pursuant to Rule 12 of the Department's Rules of Practice, 14 C.F.R. 

§ 302.12, ACT Havayolları A.Ş. d/b/a ACT Airlines respectfully moves to 

withhold from public disclosure the contents of Confidential Exhibit A (3 

pages total). In accordance with Rule 12, the exhibit has been marked 

"Confidential" and is being filed under seal. 

 Confidential Exhibit A contains financial and operational information 

relating to the applicant and projections relating to the applicant’s proposed 

service. The exhibit incorporates private, financial and commercial 

information of a type that is not usually disclosed to the public, and it is 

being provided to the Department solely in support of the carrier's 

application. Disclosure of this information would cause material harm to the 

applicant's competitive position.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.30

        [LETTERHEAD OF SILICON GRAPHICS COMPUTER SYSTEMS APPEARS HERE]

September 16, 1998

Ms. Rosemary Correia
Discreet Logic, Inc.
10 Duke Street
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
H3C2L7

     Re:   Extension of Value Added Reseller Agreement terms and conditions;
           Agreement No. 12-11-441

Dear Ms. Correia:

This letter shall serve to extend discount and payment terms of the Value Added 
Reseller Agreement ("Agreement"), and the Amendment thereto, between Silicon
Graphics, Inc. ("SGI") and Discreet Logic Inc. ("Discreet"). This extension 
shall be effective as of October 1, 1998 and continue until and including 
December 31, 1998.

All other terms and conditions in the above referenced Agreement and Amendment 
shall apply to purchases made by Discreet during the term of this extension.

During the term of this extension, SGI shall present to Discreet a new contract 
proposal for Discreet review and execution.

Please indicate your acceptance of the above referenced extension by signing 
where noted below. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact 
me.

Very truly yours,                         Acknowledged and agreed.

/s/ Erna Arnesen                          

Erna Arnesen                              By: /s/ Winston Rodrigues
Vice President, Global Channels              --------------------------------
(650)933-5910                             Name: Winston Rodrigues
                                               ------------------------------
                                          Title: Senior V.P. Advanced Systems
                                                -----------------------------

cc: April Tan (SGI)                       Date: 98/09/18
    Jacquelyn L. Rider (SGI)                   ------------------------------