alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 172 (Friday, September 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46954-46955]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23617]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Bonneville Power Administration


Watershed Management Program

AGENCY: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Department of Energy 
(DOE).

ACTION: Notice of availability of Record of Decision (ROD).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of the ROD to adopt a 
set of prescriptions (goals, strategies, and procedural requirements) 
that apply to future BPA-funded watershed management projects. Various 
sources--including Indian tribes, state agencies, property owners, 
private conservation groups, or other Federal agencies--propose 
watershed projects to the Northwest Power Planning Council (Council) 
for BPA funding. Following independent scientific and public reviews, 
Council then selects projects to recommend for BPA funding. BPA adopts 
this set of prescriptions to standardize the planning and 
implementation of individual watershed management projects. This 
decision is based on consideration of potential environmental impacts 
evaluated in

[[Page 46955]]

BPA's Watershed Management Program Final Environmental Impact Statement 
(DOE/EIS-0265) published July 8, 1997, and filed with the Environmental 
Protection Agency (EPA) the week of July 14, 1997 (EPA Notice of 
Availability published July 18, 1997, 62 FR 65, 16145).

ADDRESSES: Copies of the ROD and Environmental Impact Statement may be 
obtained by calling BPA's toll-free document request line: 1-800-622-
4520.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Eric N. Powers--ECN-4, Bonneville 
Power Administration, P.O. Box 3621, Portland, Oregon, 97208-3621, 
phone number (503) 230-5823, fax number (503) 230-5699.

    Issued in Portland, Oregon, on August 27, 1997.
Sue F. Hickey,
Chief Operating Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-23617 Filed 9-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
#### Hubert FLOWERS, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1952.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 2, 1978.

Weiner, Robbins & Tunkey, Miami, for appellant.

*115Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Steven R. Jacob, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, defendant below, was found guilty, pursuant to a jury verdict, of burglary of a conveyance, petit larceny and loitering. He was sentenced to five (5) years in prison on the burglary charge with credit for time served, to wit: forty-six (46) days. On the charges of petit larceny and loitering and prowling, appellant was sentenced to credit for time served, to wit: forty-six (46) days.

After carefully reviewing the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, it is our opinion that no reversible error has been made to appear. *United States v. Stephenson,*474 F.2d 1353 (5th Cir. 1973); L. *L. J. v. State,*334 So.2d 656 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); *Mahoney*v. *State,*300 So.2d 743 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); *State*v. *Young,*217 So.2d 567 (Fla.1968), and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d).

Accordingly, appellant’s convictions and sentences are hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000942789
<NAME> VALRICO BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,678
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   358
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      7,160
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,240
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,265
<LOANS>                                         38,434
<ALLOWANCE>                                        501
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,919
<DEPOSITS>                                      48,876
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,100
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,044
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           297
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,602
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  54,919
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,454
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  752
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   431
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,637
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,514
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,544
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,093
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      181
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,408
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    504
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         504
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       348
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.17
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.29
<LOANS-NON>                                        153
<LOANS-PAST>                                        42
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     97
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   492
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      204
<RECOVERIES>                                        32
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  501
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# EXHIBIT 23

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report
dated February 17, 2006 accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Image Sensing
Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Image Sensing Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries on Forms
S-8 (File No. 333-82546, effective February 11, 2002; File No. 333-86169, effective August 30, 1999; and File No.
333-09289, effective July 31, 1996) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-41706, effective July 19, 2000).

/s/   Grant Thornton LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 17, 2006

---
# DLA honors sacrifices made, victory won on D-Day

/ Published June 6, 2018

Seventy-four years ago today, American military forces, joined by their comrades in arms from Allied nations, began the final push to free Europe from Nazi oppression.

Known forever after as D-Day — June 6, 1944 — saw more than 160,000 Allied warfighters storm the beach of Normandy, France, under heavy fire. More than 9,000 were killed. Their sacrifice allowed the Allies to fight their way into Europe, liberating France in August and ultimately all of Europe less than one year later.

Although the United States would not create a combined joint quartermaster organization till after the war and the Defense Supply Agency would not exist until 1961, logistics were obviously a crucial aspect of delivering so many men and so much materiel by ocean into combat.

“D-Day: The Supplies” is an engaging and concise fact sheet on the logistics behind D-Day, created by U.S. European Command for the 70th anniversary of the invasion in 2014. The Army also hosts a web feature on the invasion, featuring an extensive collection of articles and photographs.

For an in-depth analysis of WWII logistics following D-Day, read "Seduction in Combat: Losing Sight of Logistics After D-Day," by Norman R. Denny, a U.S. Army Command and General Staff College master's thesis.
#### Michael J. BRUNNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-593.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Nov. 18, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 18, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
Xiangtian (USA) Air Power Co., Ltd.: Exhibit 10.22 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Loan Contract 

Through amiable and fully negotiation, Sanhe City Lucksky
Electrical Engineering Limited Company (hereafter referred to as the Borrower)
and Lucksky Kelitai Air Power Machinery Co., Ltd. Yaojiao Branch office,
(hereafter referred to as the Lender) come into the following Contract to
perform: 

Art. 1. On April 25, 2015, the Lender lent RMB Three
Million One Hundred and Fifty Thousand Only (in words) (¥3,150,000) to the
Borrower. The repayment deadline is December 31, 2015. 

Art. 2. The Lender shall lend money to the Borrower
strictly in accordance with the national credit policies and plans. Otherwise,
the Lender shall pay the Borrower penalty by day based on the default amount.
The calculation of default amount will be the same as that of interest amount
for overdue loan. 

Art.3. The Borrower shall guarantee to repay the loan
principal in time. If delay is inevitable, the Borrower shall provide written
application before loan maturity. Only after the Lender agrees its delay
application and signs the delay repayment agreement, can the Borrower delay the
repayment. In case the Borrower doesn’t provide delay application or both
parties don’t come into a delay agreement, the Lender will require the Borrower
paying another 5 % of the default amount as interest from the maturity
time. 

Art. 4. In case of any disputes, both parties shall
negotiate with each for solution. If the negotiation fails, the second way shall
be taken for solution: 

1. Apply to the Sanhe Arbitration Committee for arbitration;

2. Apply to the People’s Court for prosecution. 

Art. 6. This Contract will come into effect from the
signing date. 

This Contract is in duplication with each party holding one copy. 

	Lender (official seal): 	

	Legal Representative: 



	Borrower (official seal): 	


	Legal Representative: 
	Date: April 25, 2015
Exhibit 99.1


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, John Gott, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
SLS International, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
         ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
         of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
         U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:  August 14, 2002



                                             /s/ John Gott
                                             -------------
                                             John Gott
                                             President, Chief Executive Officer
                                             and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
      32.2




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted), the undersigned, Mark R. Doede, President, Chief Operating Officer
      and
      Chief Financial Officer of Integral Vision, Inc. (the *“Company”* ),
      hereby
      certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:




1. **** The
      Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006
      (the *“Periodic
      Report”* ),
      to
      which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. **** The
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period
      covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for
      the
      period covered by the Periodic Report.




DATED:
            March
                17, 2007/S/
                Mark R. DoedeMark
                R. DoedePresident,
                Chief Operating Officer,and
                Chief Financial Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Reportof the Inspector General of the Securities and Exchange Commission on agencycompliance for fiscal year ... with the Improper Payments Elimination andRecovery Act.**
 
2011 | 2012
 
SuDoc Number:SE 1.2: IM 7/
Item Number:0904 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001063040
 
July 3, 2018
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Juan C. Perez, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Amendment No.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of SiliconMountain Holdings, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’smost recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the smallbusiness issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:January 2, 2008         /s/ Juan C. Perez   Juan C. Perez   Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002  In connection with the Quarterly
Report of PCS Edventures!.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), I, Anthony A. Maher, President and CEO
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)  The information contained in
the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.    Date:
February 05, 2009

By:
/s/Anthony A. MaherCEO, President, Chairman of the Board of
 Directors and acting CFO
(principal executive
officer)   A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.   1
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

((((((((((((((((

No. 09-0522

((((((((((((((((

In Re  John M. O'quinn, P.C. D/B/A O'quinn & Laminack; John M. O'quinn & Associates, A Texas General Partnership; John M. O'quinn & Associates, L.L.P. D/B/A O'quinn & Laminack; John M. O'quinn Law Firm, P.L.L.C.; O'quinn & Laminack; And John M. O'quinn, Relators

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

**ORDER**

1.The agreed motion to abate mandamus proceeding, filed on December 14, 2009, is granted, and this case is **ABATED** to allow the parties to proceed with settlement negotiations.

2.This case is removed from the Court's active docket until **February 24, 2010**, by which time the parties must file either a status report or a motion to dismiss.  The parties shall immediately notify this Court about any changes in status in the settlement proceedings.

Done at the City of Austin, this 18th day of December, 2009.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
**Beef Packer Cost Analyzer (91012)**
```

[115th Congress Public Law 150]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 1234]]

Public Law 115-150
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
1100 Kings Road in Jacksonville, Florida, as the ``Rutledge Pearson Post 
       Office Building''. <<NOTE: Mar. 23, 2018 -  [H.R. 3638]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. RUTLEDGE PEARSON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1100 Kings Road in Jacksonville, Florida, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Rutledge Pearson Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Rutledge 
Pearson Post Office Building''.

    Approved March 23, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3638:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 163 (2017):
                                    Dec. 12, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 164 (2018):
                                    Mar. 7, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### Willie E. SIMMONS, alias Eddie J. Simmons, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. L-358.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 28, 1970.

Virlyn B. Willis, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Horace Knowlton, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The record and briefs on appeal having been examined and given full consideration and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order appealed is hereby affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21D0148. KEVIN UPKINS v. THE STATE.

A jury found Kevin Upkins guilty of armed robbery, and his conviction was

affirmed in an unpublished opinion. See Upkins v. State, Case No. A14A1952,

(decided March 25, 2015). Since then, Upkins has filed several post-conviction

motions seeking to challenge his conviction.

1Recently,Upkinsfiled an extraordinary

motion for new trial. The trial court denied the motion on October 27, 2020, and

Upkinsfiled a direct appeal. We dismissed the appeal based on Upkins’ failure to file

a discretionary application. See Upkins v. State, Case No. A21A0685 (decided Dec.

1, 2020). On December 7, 2020, Upkins filed an application for discretionary appeal

from the October 27, 2020 order. The State has filed moved to dismiss the

application.

An application for discretionary review must be filed within 30 days of entry

of the judgment or trial court order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The

requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an

application for appeal not made in compliance therewith. See Boyle v. State, 190 Ga.

App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Upkinsfiled this application 41 days after entry

of the order he seeksto appeal. We thuslack jurisdiction to consider the merits of this

1 Upkins has filed other actions in this Court, including: Upkins v. State, Case

No. A19A1566, (decided March 18, 2019) (dismissing direct appeal from the denial

of an extraordinary motion for new trial); and Upkins v. State, Case No. A19D0418,

(decided May 1, 2019) (denying discretionary review of trial court’s order that denied

a “motion for de novo hearing” in which defendant argued his conviction was void).

January 05, 2021
application. Accordingly, the State’smotion to dismissis herebyGRANTED, and this

application is hereby DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

01/05/2021