alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2341]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Coast Guard
[CGD08-96-063]


Lower Mississippi River Waterway Safety Advisory Committee Gaming 
Vessel Subcommittee

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Lower Mississippi River Waterway Safety Advisory 
Committee's Gaming Vessel Subcommittee will meet to discuss navigation 
safety matters affecting the Lower Mississippi River area. The meeting 
will be open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held from 10 a.m. to approximately 12 noon 
on Tuesday, February 18, 1997.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in room 1830 of the World Trade 
Center, 2 Canal Street, New Orleans, Louisiana.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Monty Ledet, USCG, Administrator, Lower Mississippi River Waterway 
Safety Advisory Committee, c/o Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District 
(oan), Room 1211, Hale Boggs Federal Building, 501 Magazine Street, New 
Orleans, LA 70130-3396, telephone (504) 589-4686.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of this meeting is given pursuant to 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2 section 1 et seq. 
The meeting is open to the public. Members of the public may present 
written or oral statements at the meeting. The agenda for the meeting 
consists of the following items:

    (1) Introduction of members.
    (2) Discussion of emergency evacuation of gaming vessels.
    (3) Presentation of any additional new items for consideration of 
the Committee.

INFORMATION ON SERVICES FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES: For 
information on facilities or services for individuals with disabilities 
or to request special assistance at the meeting, contact the 
Administrator where listed under ``For Further Information Contract'' 
as soon as possible.

    Dated: January 10, 1997.
T. W. Josiah,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 97-2341 Filed 1-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46499-46500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23304]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the 
Secretary publishes a list of information collections it has submitted 
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance in 
compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 
35) and 5 CFR 1320.5. The following are those information collections 
recently submitted to OMB.
    1. Information Collection Requirements Contained in 42 CFR part 
1004 (Revised Peer Review Organization Sanctions for Failing to Meet 
Statutory Obligations)--This information collection requirement is 
necessary to enable a Peer Review Organization (PRO) to submit a report 
and recommendation to the OIG if PRO-identified violations have not 
been resolved. In addition, an alternative sanctions notification 
process provides sanctioned practitioners or other persons the option 
of informing patients directly to the sanction action taken against 
them.--Respondents: Individuals, Business or other for-profit; Not-for-
profit institutions--Burden Information for the PRO Report--Annual 
Responses: 7;Annual Burden per Response: 4 hours;Annual Burden for PRO 
Report: 28 hours--Burden Information for the Sanction Notification--
Annual Responses: 5;Annual Burden per Response: 2 hours;Annual Burden 
for Sanction Notification: 10 hours--Total Burden: 38 hours.
    OMB Desk Officer: Allison Eydt.

[[Page 46500]]

    Copies of the information collection packages listed above can be 
obtained by calling the OS Reports Clearance Officer on (202) 690-6207. 
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent directly to the OMB desk officer designated 
above at the following address: Human Resources and Housing Branch, 
Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 
10235, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503.
    Comments may also be sent to Cynthia Agens Bauer, OS Reports 
Clearance Officer, Room 503H, Humphrey Building, 200 Independence 
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20201. Written comments should be received 
within 30 days of this notice.

    Dated: August 27, 1997.
William R. Beldon,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, Budget.
[FR Doc. 97-23304 Filed 9-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-04-M
#### Robert HAMILTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-809.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 28, 1978.

Rehearing Denied March 31, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Thomas G. Murray, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Ronald A. Dion, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and HEN-DRY and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Robert Hamilton seeks reversal of his conviction for robbery and possession of a firearm as a result of his holding up a Chicken Unlimited Restaurant.

For his single point on appeal, Hamilton argues that the court erred in permitting the prosecution to elicit evidence of a robbery of another restaurant (Chuck’s Fried Chicken) in which he was involved because such evidence served only to infer a propensity on his part to engage in criminal conduct. We cannot agree.

Evidence revealing other crimes is admissible if relevant and if it tends to show identity, common scheme or design, guilty knowledge, intent, etc. *Williams v. State,*110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959); *Drayton v. State,*292 So.2d 395 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).

The record reflects the following similarities between the two robberies: Both chicken restaurants are fast food chains located within thirty blocks of one another on the same highway. The second robbery occurred within one day of the first, and both robberies were committed by use of a firearm placed in Hamilton’s waistband. Thus, evidence of this second robbery was admissible to show a common scheme. Cf. *Christie v. State,*246 So.2d 605 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971).

Moreover, even if the evidence of the second robbery was not admissible, the error would be harmless in view of the overwhelming eyewitness testimony identifying Hamilton as the perpetrator of the instant robbery. See *Keel v. State,*243 *31So.2d 630 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971); *Gordan v. State,*288 So.2d 295 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).

Affirmed.
No. 9350.

#### Harris et al. *v.*Harris et al.

(Decided May 8, 1906.)

Error to Superior Court of Cincinnati.

*Messrs. Burch & Johnson,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Jacob Shroder*and *Mr. Frank Seinsheimer,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers and Spear, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21454]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal 
Reserve System.
    Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Monday, August 18, 1997.
    Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.
    Status: Closed.
    Matters to be Considered:
    1. Proposal regarding a software contract within the Federal 
Reserve System.
    2. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    3. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-3207, beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting.

    Dated: August 8, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-21454 Filed 8-8-97; 4:33 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
**U.S. Vegetable and Melon Farms (92004)**
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44956]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22453]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy, DoD


Notice of Availability of Inventions for Licensing; Government 
Owned Inventions

SUMMARY: The inventions listed below are assigned to the United States 
Government as represented by the Secretary of the Navy and are 
available for licensing by the Department of the Navy.
    Copies of the patent applications cited are available from the 
Office of Naval Research. Requests for copies of the patent 
applications must include the patent application serial number.
    U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 08/508,653: Rapid Immunoassay 
for Cariogenic Bacteria; filed July 28, 1995.
    U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 08/766,203: Rapid Immunoassay 
for Cariogenic Bacteria; filed December 12, 1996.
    International Patent Application No. PCT/US96/12135: Rapid 
Immunoassay for Streptococcus Mutans; filed July 23, 1996.

FOR COPIES OF THE PATENT APPLICATIONS OR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
Mr. R.J. Erickson, Staff Patent Attorney, Office of Naval Research, ONR 
00CC, Ballston Tower One, 800 North Quincy Street, Arlington, Virginia 
22217-5660, telephone (703) 696-4001.

    Dated: August 15, 1997.
M.D. Sutton,
LCDR, JAGC, USN, Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-22453 Filed 8-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
# L_2010342EN.01001501.xml

| 28.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 342/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 342/15

---

DECISION TAKEN BY COMMON ACCORD BETWEEN THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES

of 10 December 2010

on the location of the seat of the European GNSS Agency

(2010/803/EU)

THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES,

Having regard to Article 341 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 912/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 setting up the European GNSS Agency, repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1321/2004 on the establishment of structures for the management of European satellite navigation programmes and amending Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 (1) established the European GNSS Agency. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 912/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 setting up the European GNSS Agency, repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1321/2004 on the establishment of structures for the management of European satellite navigation programmes and amending Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 (1) established the European GNSS Agency.

| (2) | The location of the seat of the European GNSS Agency should be determined, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The location of the seat of the European GNSS Agency should be determined,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The European GNSS Agency shall have its seat in Prague.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 December 2010.

The President

V. VAN QUICKENBORNE

---

(1)  
  OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p. 11.

1

---
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99(a)

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

        In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2003 of Citizens Holding Company (the "Company"), as filed with
the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"),
I, Greg L. McKee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
                as amended; and

        (2)     the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
                presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
                results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 12, 2003                           /s/ Greg L. McKee
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Greg L. McKee
                                             Chief Executive Officer
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1672 

To suspend temporarily the duty on aminoguanidine bicarbonate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on aminoguanidine 

bicarbonate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION ON DUTY ON AMINOGUANIDINE 

4 BICARBONATE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.39.14 Aminoguanidine bicarbonate 

(CAS No. 2582–30–1) (provided for in subheading 

2928.00.50) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 
2 

•S 1672 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
**Livestock Slaughter -- Annual Summary (PLS-BB)
A product of the National Agricultural Statistics Service, Agricultural Statistics Board, U.S. Department of Agriculture**Description:**
**
No. 9523.

#### Dieckmann *v.*Hunt et al.

(Decided June 12, 1906.)

Error to Circuit' Court of Hamilton county.

*Messrs. Renner & Renner*and *Mr. Eugene*Heim, for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Fulton & Woost; Mr. G. A. Groom*and *Mr. F. E. Neiderhelman,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew and Davis, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 171 (Thursday, September 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46775-46776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23430]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

California Fashions Industries, Inc.

[TA-W-33,018 and TA-W-018A]


Los Angeles, California and New York, New York; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the

[[Page 46776]]

Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance on January 28, 1997, applicable to all 
workers of California Fashions Industries, Inc. located in Los Angeles, 
California. The notice was published in the Federal Register on 
February 13, 1997 (62 FR 6805).
    At the request of the petitioners, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New information received 
by the company shows that worker separations have occurred at the New 
York, New York location of California Fashions Industries, Inc. The New 
York, New York location is the showroom and sales office for California 
Fashions' production facility in Los Angeles, California. The workers 
are engaged in the production of ladies' garments.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of California Fashions Industries, Inc. who were adversely 
affected by increased imports of ladies' garments. Accordingly, the 
Department is amending the certification to cover the workers of 
California Industries, Inc., New York, New York.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-33,018 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of California Fashions Industries, Inc., Los 
Angeles, California (TA-W-33,018), and New York, New York (TA-W-
33,018A) who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after November 26, 1995 are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC this 22nd day of August, 1997.
Russell T. Kile,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-23430 Filed 9-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
114 STAT. 1940 PUBLIC LAW 106–449—NOV. 6, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 3062:

SENATE REPORTS: No. 106–469 (Comm. on Governmental Affairs).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate.

Oct. 19, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 106–449

106th Congress

An Act

To modify the date on which the Mayor of the District of Columbia submits a

performance accountability plan to Congress, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY

PLAN.

Section 456 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (section

47–231 et seq. of the District of Columbia Code) is amended—

(1) in subsection (a)—

(A) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘Not later than March

1 of each year (beginning with 1998)’’ and inserting

‘‘Concurrent with the submission of the District of

Columbia budget to Congress each year (beginning with

2001)’’; and

(B) in paragraph (2)(A) by striking ‘‘that describe an

acceptable level of performance by the government and

a superior level of performance by the government’’; and

(2) in subsection (b)—

(A) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘1999’’ and inserting

‘‘2001’’; and

(B) in paragraph (2)(A) by striking ‘‘for an acceptable

level of performance by the government and a superior

level of performance by the government’’.

Approved November 6, 2000.

Nov. 6, 2000

[S. 3062]
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In connection with the Annual Report of Miracor Diagnostics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, M.
Lee Hulsebus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
USC ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003,
that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

                                                       /s/ M. Lee Hulsebus
                                                       ------------------
                                                       M. Lee Hulsebus, Chief
                                                       Executive Officer

Dated: 3/29/04
#### Robert A. BENZ, Appellant, v. Christine M. BENZ, Appellee.

No. DD-255.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, ■First District.

Feb. 23, 1978.

*215M. J. Menge of Shell, Fleming, Davis & Menge, Pensacola, for appellant.

W. H, F. Wiltshire of Harrell, Wiltshire, Stone & Swearingen, Pensacola, for appel-lee.

MILLS, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order modifying final judgment entered in a dissolution of marriage proceeding. The major point on appeal is whether there was a sufficient change in the circumstances of the parties to justify the increase in child support from $100 to $250 per child per month, an increase in rehabilitative alimony from $200 to $450 a month, and an extension of rehabilitative alimony for one year.

The determination of the trial court regarding modification of alimony and child support will not be disturbed on appeal unless it is clearly shown that the trial court abused its discretion. *Zammas v. Zammas,*328 So.2d 519 (Fla.3d DCA 1976). The trial court’s finding that there has been a substantial and material change in circumstances between the parties since the entry of the final judgment is supported by competent evidence. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in increasing the amount of child support from $100 to $250 per month per child; however, we do not believe that the increase and extension of rehabilitative alimony was supported by the evidence presented to the trial court. Since the entry of final judgment Mrs. Benz has become employed full time (nine months out of the year) as a teacher’s aide. She did not testify that she was precluded from obtaining any educational or other rehabilitative benefits because she had to work. She did not indicate that there were any career opportunities that she wished to pursue. The increased needs of the family, as indicated by Mrs. Benz’s financial affidavit, were fully covered by the increase in child support payments. We therefore find that there was no basis in the record for the extension and increase in rehabilitative alimony.

We find that the trial court properly awarded attorney’s fees to Mrs. Benz and that the amount awarded was reasonable. We do not find that the trial court erred either in refusing to consider Mr. Benz’s testimony concerning Mrs. Benz’s financial affidavit or in denying the motion to transfer. However, we believe that the trial court should have delineated Mr. Benz’s visitation rights with the children since both parties requested that this be done and it is not clear from the record before us that any agreement on this issue was reached.

' Therefore, this cause is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the trial court for entry of an order specifying Mr. Benz’s visitation rights with his children.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER, J., concur.