alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# July/August Loglines now available

/ Published July 16, 2018

The July/August edition of Loglines, the Defense Logistics Agency’s flagship magazine, is now available online and in print at some DLA locations. The publication depicts the hard work of DLA employees and gives an in-depth look at how they provide everything from food to fuel to Department of Defense customers and other federal agencies. 

This issue includes:

**Old Stuff, New Life**, an overview of how DLA Disposition Services gives new purpose to old or excess items;

**Sustained Power**, highlighting DLA’s partnership with the U .S. Army Corps of Engineers to rebuild the power grid in Puerto Rico;

**Continued Deterrence**, a feature on DLA’s support to nuclear missile programs; and

**Rigging Victory**, about DLA parachute riggers who do more than just pack chutes;

The magazine also includes a question-and-answer column with Navy Rear Adm. Deborah Haven, director of DLA’s Joint Reserve Force, plus stories on the agency’s new Service Readiness Dashboard and the new Health of the Agency initiative created to spot trends and develop solutions to workforce issues in areas such as human resources, equal employment opportunity and safety.

Download a copy of the issue or watch a video promoting the July/August edition.
Exhibit 32.1

           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
International Surfacing, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, I,
Samuel Serritella, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
International Surfacing, Inc. hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended March 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of International Surfacing, Inc.

Dated: November 19, 2004

                                            INTERNATIONAL SURFACING, INC.

                                            By: /s/ Samuel Serritella
                                                    -----------------
                                                    Samuel Serritella,
                                                    CEO and CFO
<PAGE>

Exhibit 31.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                         I, Blaine Froats, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AEC. (the
"REGISTRANT");

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have;

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "EVALUATION DATE");

(c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our required evaluation as of
the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

                         BY /S/ BLAINE FROATS
                            - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                            BLAINE FROATS
                            CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Date: August 11, 2004
#### Nelson Earl KOWALCZYK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-597.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 17, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 13, 1978.

Black & Denaro, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William M. Grodnick, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and HEN-DRY and KEHOE, JJ.

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellant, defendant below, brings this appeal from a final judgment of conviction for first degree murder, robbery, conspiracy to commit a felony, and a sentence of life imprisonment. Of the three points raised on appeal by appellant, one was abandoned. The two remaining points fail to show any reversible error on the part of the trial court; therefore, the judgment and sentence appealed are affirmed. See, e.g., *Hoskins v. State,*70 Fla. 186, 69 So. 701 (1915); *Brown v. State,*40 Fla. 459, 25 So. 63 (1898); *Abbott v. State,*334 So.2d 642 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); *Rodriguez v. State,*327 So.2d 903 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); *Mobley v. State,*327 So.2d 900 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); and *Sikes v. State,*280 So.2d 17 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).

Affirmed.
#### Bettye M. BELL and Willie James Bell v. The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA et al.

SC 2506.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Jan. 27, 1978.

*336Alfred W. Goldthwaite, Montgomery, for appellants.

James T. Upchurch, III, Montgomery, for appellee, The Travelers Indem. Co. of America.

SHORES, Justice.

The Bells, who are husband and wife, filed an action against Travelers and E. C. Dothard, Director of Public Safety for the State of Alabama, seeking a declaration that the action of Travelers in removing Willie Bell, the husband, as a driver under a liability policy covering an automobile belonging to the wife, was void. The trial court upheld the exclusion of the husband and the Bells appealed.

Prior to February, 1975, the Bells were covered by liability insurance with Travelers under a policy made available by Travelers to members of the Alabama Education Association (AEA). Mrs. Bell was a member of AEA, being a public school teacher in Montgomery County.

When this policy came up for renewal, Travelers advised Mrs. Bell that it would not renew the policy unless she first agreed to the removal of her husband as a driver under the policy due to his driving record. The husband had been convicted twice of speeding and once for reckless driving in the two years next preceding the renewal date of the Travelers’ policy.

The wife agreed to the husband’s being removed as a driver under the policy covering her automobile.

Thereafter, while driving the automobile owned by his wife, Mr. Bell was involved in an automobile accident which resulted in injuries to the occupants of the automobile with which he collided.

On appeal, the Bells contend that the exclusion from coverage of the husband is void as against public policy because insurance companies:

> “. . . can not avoid their responsibilities by writing a policy for a wife and excluding the husband, a licensed driver, when they know, or have reason to know, that during the term of the policy the husband will very probably sooner or later, at one time or another, operate that vehicle. . . . ”

The Bells argue that Travelers should not be permitted to exclude a spouse from a policy covering the other automobile so long as the spouse sought to be excluded holds a valid driver’s license. Such exclusion, they say, violates public policy in that it creates marital discord. They also argue that the exclusion violates the Constitution of the State of Alabama.

We are not persuaded by either argument. The exclusion is clear and unambiguous and was agreed to by Mrs. Bell. This insurance company, like others, has a right, absent statutory provisions to the contrary, to impose whatever conditions it wishes on its obligations, so long as such conditions do not offend public policy. *Northam v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.,*231 Ala. 105, 163 So. 635 (1935); 29 Am.Jur.Insurance § 264. We find nothing violative of the Constitution or to the public policy of this state in the provision excluding the insured’s spouse from coverage in *337the policy before us. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
No. 00-7147.

#### Izaguirre-Losoya *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21989]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3838-000]


Duquesne Light Company; Notice of Filing

August 14, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 24, 1997, Duquesne Light Company (DLC) 
filed a Service Agreement dated July 8, 1997 with NorAm Energy 
Services, Inc., under DLC's Open Access Transmission Tariff (Tariff). 
The Service Agreement adds NorAm Energy Services, Inc. as a customer 
under the Tariff. DLC requests an effective date of July 8, 1997 for 
the Service Agreement.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before August 26, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any party wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21989 Filed 8-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 23.1



|     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Thigpen, Jones, Seaton & Co., P.C. C E R T I F I E D  P U B L
I C  A C C O U N T A N T S B U S I N E S S  C O N S U L T A N T S 1004
Hillcrest Parkway P.O. Box 400 Dublin, Georgia 31040-0400 Tel 478-272-2030 Fax
478-272-3318 E-mail tjs@tjscpa.com |  | Scotty C. Jones, CPA, CVA Frank W. Seaton, Jr., CPA Tracy G. Sharkey, CPA Grayson Dent, CPA Robyn T. Tanner, CPA Rhonda M. Norris, CPA Spencer L.
Tydings, CPA Becky G. Hines, CPA Donna H. Lumley,
CPA Lori Y. Norton, CPA, AAP Cristi H. Jones, CPA,
CVA Matthew C. Jones, CPA, CISA Heather Frazier, CPA



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated February 16, 2007, accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in
the Annual Report of CCF Holding Company on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of CCF Holding Company on Form S-8 (File
No. 333-35108).



LOGO

Dublin, Georgia

March 14,
2007
Exhibit 4.1

 

	
 
    	
 

congatec   Holding AG
    	
WKN A1610N
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
ISIN DE000A1610N5
    
	
 
    	
mit Sitz in München
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Ordnungs-Nr. 001
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Globalurkunde
    	
 
    


 

über bis zu [·] auf den Namen der Citigroup Global Markets Deutschland AG, Frankfurt am Main, lautende Stammaktien der congatec Holding AG mit Sitz in München in Form von Stückaktien

 

Aktiennummern 1 bis [·]

 

Die Anzahl der in dieser Globalurkunde verbrieften und begebenen Aktien ergibt sich aus der aktuellen virtuellen Depotdokumentation der Clearstream Banking AG, Frankfurt am Main.

 

Diese Globalurkunde ist ausschließlich zur Verwahrung bei der Clearstream Banking AG, Frankfurt am Main, bestimmt.

 

Zu dieser Globalurkunde wurde kein Globalgewinnanteilschein ausgefertigt.

 

Die in dieser Globalurkunde verbrieften Aktien sind ab dem 1. Januar 2015 gewinnberechtigt.

 

München, im November 2015

 

	
congatec Holding AG
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Der Vorstand
    	
 
    	
Der Aufsichtsrat
    


 











 

Convenience Translation

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
Security   Identification
    
	
 
    	
congatec   Holding AG
    	
Number (WKN):
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
A1610NJ
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
ISIN:   DE000A1610N5
    
	
 
    	
with   registered seat in Munich
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Order number: 001
    
	
 
    	
Global   Share Certificate(1)
    	
 
    


 

regarding up to [·] registered ordinary shares with no par value in the name of

Citigroup Global Markets Deutschland AG, Frankfurt am Main,

 

Share numbers: 1 through [·]

 

	
 
    	
The number of shares   which are evidenced and issued through this global share certificate results   from the current virtual custody documentation of Clearstream Banking AG,   Frankfurt am Main.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
This global share   certificate is made exclusively for custody by Clearstream Banking AG,   Frankfurt am Main.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
There is no global   dividend coupon issued together with this global share certificate.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
The shares which are   evidenced by this global share certificate participate in the profits of the   company starting from January 1, 2015.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Munich, in   November 2015
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
congatec   Holding AG
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Member of the Management Board
    	
 
    	
Member of the Supervisory Board
    


 




(1)  This convenience translation into the English language is for information purposes only and is not a valid share certificate.
# Troop Support retirees honored for 69 years of combined service

/ Published Feb. 27, 2018
PHILADELPHIA, 

Two Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support employees were recognized for their 69 years of combined service during a retirement ceremony Feb. 22.

Brian Potena, a quality assurance specialist with Industrial Hardware, retired with 38 years of service. Nancy Hildreth, a quality assurance specialist with Subsistence, retired with 31 years of service.

Army Brig. Gen. Mark Simerly, DLA Troop Support commander, presided over the ceremony and expressed his gratitude to the retirees for their role in supporting the warfighter.

“I want to thank you both for what you’ve been able to provide to us,” Simerly said.

Potena first entered federal service as a plumber at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard in 1980. He joined DLA in 2004 as a product specialist before becoming a quality assurance specialist in 2005.

“I can’t believe 38 years went by just like that,” Potena said. “I met a lot of good people and I feel very blessed.”

Potena said that he’ll miss his co-workers and looks forward to travelling and spending quality time with his grandchildren during his retirement.

Hildreth entered federal service in 1986 with the Defense Contract Administration. She joined Subsistence in 1988 as a clerk and became a quality assurance specialist in 1992.

Hildreth said that her biggest contribution was the recommendation and creation of a joint services buyers guide for Subsistence items that provides a common reference for all DLA customers and vendors to quickly identify customer requirements and standards.

She said she hopes her co-workers continue to expand on those initiatives to provide even better support to the warfighter.

“It has been my honor and privilege to be a part of this organization,” Hildreth said. “As the wife of a retired Army veteran, what we do is very near and dear to my heart. Please remember who our customers are.”

Hildreth and her husband plan to move to North Carolina to help raise their grandson with their son and daughter-in-law.
#### METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Appellant, v. Charles SMITH et ux., Appellees.

No. 77-119.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 25, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 27, 1978.

Blackwell, Walker, Gray, Powers, Flick & Hoehl and James E. Tribble, Miami, for appellant.

Nachwalter, Christie & Falk, Miami, Spector & Tunnicliff and Sam Spector, Tallahassee, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, NATHAN and KE-HOE, JJ.

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellants, defendants below, bring this appeal from a final judgment, dated November 18, 1976, entered by the trial court pursuant to a non-jury trial, awarding money damages to appellees, plaintiffs below, as a result of injuries sustained by appellee Charles Smith in a collision with a bus being operated by appellant Metropolitan Dade County Transit Authority [hereinafter referred to as MTA]. We affirm.

The points on appeal may be summarized as follows: (1) whether the judgment should be reversed on the basis of sovereign immunity and the notice provisions of Section 2.2, Code of Metropolitan Dade County; (2) whether the trial court erred in entering summary judgment on the question of liability and limiting the trial to the issue of damages; and (3) whether the amount of the damages awarded was excessive and unsupported by the evidence.

In regard to appellants’ first point on appeal, we feel that, under the facts of this case, the doctrine of sovereign immunity is inapplicable. *Butts v. County of Dade,**41178 So.2d 592 (Fla.3d DCA 1965). Further, appellants’ contentions in regard to the lack of notice pursuant to Section 2.2,. Code of Metropolitan Dade County, are without merit.

In our opinion, the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment on the question of liability in favor of appel-lees and limiting the trial below to the question of damages. The record reflects sufficient evidence to sustain the summary judgment. We note that the evidence shows as a matter of law some degree of negligence on the part of MTA. We further note that the question of the imputed liability of appellee Charles Smith was not raised in the trial court; therefore, it cannot be raised for the first time by this appeal.

In regard to appellants’ third point on appeal, it is our opinion that the amount of the damages awarded is supported by competent substantial evidence in the record; therefore, we cannot substitute our opinion for that of the trier of facts. Accordingly, this point is also without merit.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 171 (Thursday, September 4, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 46707-46708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23438]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-187, RM-9149]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Patterson, IA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition by West Wind 
Broadcasting requesting the allotment of Channel 290A to Patterson, 
Iowa, as the community's first local aural transmission service. 
Channel 290A can be allotted to Patterson in compliance with the 
Commission's minimum distance separation requirements without the 
imposition of a site restriction. The coordinates for Channel 290A at 
Patterson are 41-20-54 NL and 93-52-49 WL.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before October 20, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before November 4, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: Victor 
A. Michael, Jr., President, West Wind Broadcasting, c/o Magic City 
Media, 1912 Capitol Avenue, Suite 300, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 
(petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-187, adopted August 
20, 1997, and released August 29, 1997. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M 
Street, NW, Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also 
be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 
857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.


[[Page 46708]]


Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-23438 Filed 9-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P