alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED SEPTEMBER 14, 2011 •JEI^ARTMENT OF 

;-iANSPORTATiON 

XKETGPERATiONS 

ZOli SEP iS A 9: 3 1 

U.S. DEPARTMIHNT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

!N THE MATTER OF 

T GI FREIGH T 

FAA DOCKET No. CP10NM0012 

(Civil Penally Action) 

DMSNo. FAA-2010-1079 

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS 

Rcspondenl TGI Frcighl ("Respondent") has filed two motions m limine, each 

seeking to limit the evidence that Complainant Federal Aviation Administralipn 

("Complainant") may present at the hearing. Complainant has filed objections to each. 

Each motion is denied. 

Respondent's first motion seeks to preclude Complainant from offering at the 

hearing any evidence pertaining to 1) prior investigations of Respondent, 2) allegations 

concerning improperly handled shipments prior to a certain dale, and 3) asserted 

violations prior to a certain date. This motion is DENIED. It is manifestly premature. 

The proper time to object to an evidentiary proffer is when it is made. 

Respondent's second motion asks that Complainant's evidence be limited to 

materials in Complainant's possession on the date il concluded its investigation into this 

matter - a date Respondent unilaterally fixes as the date Complainant filed its Notice of 

Proposed Civil Penalty. Grant of the motion would severely undermine the discovery 
process. Respondent, moreover, alleges no prejudice. Hie motion is DENIED. 

SO ORDERIiD. 

Attachment - Service List 

V ^{y^HJcKju^^ ^ 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law .ludge 
FAA Docket No. CP10NM0UI2 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 2059J 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Rebecca J. Hozubin, Respondent '.v Counsel 

Wilkerson Hozubin 

310 K Street, Suite 405 

Anchorage. AK 99501 

TEL: 907-276-5297 

FAX: 907-276-5291 

Howard L. Martin, Jr., Complainant's Counsel 

Regional Counsel, Office of Regional Counsel, AAL-7 

Alaskan Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 W. 7"^ Avenue #14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5273 

FAX: 907-271-2800 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For ser\'ice in person or by expedited courier, use tlic following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2WI000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Allention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-4JO.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SANDEE BRYAN MARION

CHIEF JUSTICE

REBECA C. MARTINEZ

PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ

LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA

IRENE RIOS

BETH WATKINS

LIZA A. RODRIGUEZ

JUSTICES FOURTH COURT OF APPE ALS DISTRICT

CADENA

- REEVES JUSTIC E CENTER

300 DOLOROSA, SUITE 32 00

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8205

- 3037

WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4TH COA.ASPX KEITH E. HOTTLE,

CLERK OF THE

COURT

TELEPHONE

(210) 335

- 2635

FACSIMILE NO.

(210) 335

- 2762

September 19, 2019

Anthony Chijioke Ngwu

604 Meadow Top

Converse, TX 78109

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAI L * Justin Cook

Cook & Cook Law Firm PLLC

8000 I

- H 10 West, Suite 1510

San Antonio, TX 78230

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 04

- 18

- 00762

- CV

Trial Court Case Number: 2017

- CI

- 19833

Style: Anthony Chijioke Ngwu

v.

Vera Amuche Ton i

Enclosed please find the order which the Honorable Court of Appeals has

issued in reference to the above styled and numbered cause.

If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Very truly yours,

KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Cle rk of C ourt

______________________ Cecilia Phillips

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 5

- 3221

cc: Megan V. Cook (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)

# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 19, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00762

- CV

Anthony Chijioke NGWU,

Appellant

v.

Vera Amuche TONI,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- CI

- 19833

Honorable Martha Tanner, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On S eptember 9, 2019, appellant filed a motion for rehearing followed by an amendment

to his motion. After consideration, we DENY the motion.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of September, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of CourtMINUTES

Court of Appeals

Fourth Court of Appeals District

San Antonio, Texas

September 19, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00762

- CV

Anthony Chijioke NGWU,

Appellant

v.

Vera Amuche TONI,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- CI

- 19833

Honorable Martha Tanner, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On S eptember 9, 2019, appellant filed a motion for rehearing followed by an amendment

to his motion. After consideration, we DENY the motion.

/s/ Beth W atkins

Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of September, 2019

.

/s/ K eith E. Hottle

KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court

Entere d this 19 th day of September 2019
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7779

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JIMMY LAWRENCE NANCE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CR-92-135, CA-96-334-R)

Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 27, 1997

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Lawrence Nance, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Nance, Nos. CR-92-

135; CA-96-334-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 7, 1996). We decline to review any

issues Appellant seeks to raise for the first time on appeal. We

deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Joseph DAWSON and Utica Mutual Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Linda SCHEBEN, John H. Quinn, John H. Glenn, Henri Landwrith and Wallace Schoetielkotle, d/b/a Holiday Inn of Altamonte Springs, Florida, and Home Insurance Company, etc., Appellees.

Nos. 77-561, 77-562.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 25, 1977.

C. Chobee Ebbets of Gosney, Cameron & Parsons, Orlando, for appellants.

Nolan Carter, Orlando, for appellee-Sche-ben.

Duncan B. Dowling, III, of Rogers & Dowling, Orlando, for appellees-Quinn et al.

ALDERMAN, Chief Judge.

These consolidated interlocutory appeals involve two orders of the trial court in a negligence case. Linda Scheben, the plaintiff, alleged that Joseph Dawson injured her by falling on her when he became involved in an altercation with an unidentified man in the lobby of a Holiday Inn. Dawson filed a third party complaint seeking contribution from the Holiday Inn.

One of the orders appealed from granted 'summary judgment to the plaintiff, Sche-ben, on the issue of liability, leaving only the question of damages to be settled by jury trial. The other order granted summary judgment for the third party defendants on Dawson’s claim for contribution. We reverse both orders. The record shows that factual issues exist which preclude summary judgments. *City of Orlando v. Ashlock,*342 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). Additionally, different inferences might be drawn even from some of the undisputed facts. *Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Schneider,*349 So.2d 728 (Fla. 4th DCA, opinion filed August 23, 1977).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DOWNEY and LETTS, JJ., concur.
**U.S. Broiler Industry (89006)**
Lake Woodruff National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan 

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service ff ur doo W ekaL eguf eR efil dli W l anoit aNComprehensive Conservation Plan ff ur doo W ekaL eguf eR efil dli W l anoit aNComprehensive Conservation Plan

Lake Woodruff NWRUSFWS Photo
guidance for

d strategies

e Fish and

e plans detail

ally above

for Service

s. The plans do

erational and

uisition.
# C_2019136DE.01003101.xml

| 12.4.2019 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 136/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2019

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 136/31

---

Berichtigung der Entschließung des Rates und der im Rat vereinigten Vertreter der Regierungen der Mitgliedstaaten zu einem Rahmen für die jugendpolitische Zusammenarbeit in Europa: die EU-Jugendstrategie 2019-2027

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 456 vom 18. Dezember 2018
  )

(2019/C 136/10)

Auf Seite 1:

Anstatt:

„Entwurf einer Entschließung des Rates und der im Rat vereinigten Vertreter der Regierungen der Mitgliedstaaten zu einem Rahmen für die jugendpolitische Zusammenarbeit in Europa: die EU-Jugendstrategie 2019-2027“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„Entschließung des Rates und der im Rat vereinigten Vertreter der Regierungen der Mitgliedstaaten zu einem Rahmen für die jugendpolitische Zusammenarbeit in Europa: die EU-Jugendstrategie 2019-2027“.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 172 (Friday, September 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46956-46957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23553]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-476-000]


Blue Lake Gas Storage Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

August 29, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 26, 1997, Blue Lake Gas Storage Company 
(Blue Lake) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, Second Revised Sheet No. 147, to be effective 
October 1, 1997.
    Blue Lake states that the attached tariff sheet is being filed in 
compliance with the Commission's Order No. 636-C issued on February 27, 
1997, at Docket Nos. RM91-11-006 and RM87-34-072. The tariff sheet 
incorporates the new right-of-first-refusal contract term cap. Blue 
Lake also states since Order No. 636-C currently is pending rehearing 
at the Commission, Blue Lake reserves its right to change its right-of-
first-refusal tariff provision to a contract term cap longer that five 
(5) years should Order No. 636-C be revised on rehearing, or as a 
result of any subsequent action by the courts.
    Blue Lake states that copies of the filing were served upon the 
company's Jurisdictional customers.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal

[[Page 46957]]

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must 
be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any Person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
 Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23553 Filed 9-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1757 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1757

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make residents of Puerto 
   Rico eligible for the refundable portion of the child tax credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 22, 2005

 Mrs. Clinton introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make residents of Puerto 
   Rico eligible for the refundable portion of the child tax credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REFUNDABLE CHILD TAX CREDIT ALLOWABLE TO RESIDENTS OF PUERTO 
              RICO WITH LESS THAN 3 CHILDREN.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 24(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to portion of credit refundable) is 
amended by inserting at the end the following new sentence: ``For 
purposes of this paragraph, taxable income shall be computed without 
regard to section 933.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2005.
    (c) Applicability.--
            (1) In general.--Any credit allowable by reason of the 
        amendment made by subsection (a) shall not exceed the 
        applicable percentage of the amount of credit which would 
        otherwise be allowable under section 24(d)(1) of the Internal 
        Revenue Code of 1986 (without regard to this subsection).
            (2) Applicable percentage.--The applicable percentage shall 
        be determined as follows:

In the case of any taxable                               The applicable
  year beginning in--                                   percentage is--
    2006..........................................                  20 
    2007..........................................                  40 
    2008..........................................                  60 
    2009..........................................                  80 
    2010 and thereafter...........................                 100.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2023220EN.01002201.xml

| 7.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 220/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 220/22

---

Corrigendum to Commission Decision (EU) 2023/1313 of 22 June 2023 approving, on behalf of the European Union, the amendments to Annex 14-B of the Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 162 of 28 June 2023
  )

On page 63, in Annex 2, first column:

for:

‘Sanuki shiro miso’,

read:

‘sanuki shiro miso’.

---
#### James Eugene PEOPLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2656.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Nov. 12, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 30, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

LUTHER KURTZ and SKYDIVE COASTAL 

CALIFORNIA d/b/a PHOENIX AREA 

SYDIVING, 

Complainant, 

v. 

CITY OF CASA GRANDE, ARIZONA, 

Respondent. 

FAA Docket No.16-16-0l 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR part 16, subpart B, 

the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby 

extended to February 10,2017. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this 

case due to the complexity of the Record. 

Kev n C. Willis 

Dir ctor, Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on December 15, 2016, I caused to be placed in the United States 

mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy of the foregoing document addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainant: 

Mr. Richard J. Durden 

27987 Riclunond Hill Road 

Conifer, CO 80433 

Counsel for Respondent: 

Brett D. Wallace 

City Attorney's Office 

51 0 E. Florence Blvd 

Casa Grande, AZ 85122 

Copies to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, A CO-I 00 

FAA Western Pacific Region, AWP-600 

Claudia ~ Roberts 

Office of Airport Compliance and 

Management Analysis
**EXHIBIT13.02**

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENTACCOUNTANTS

 

 

To the Unitholders of

The Millburn World Resource Trust:

 

In our opinion, the accompanying statements of financial condition,including the condensed schedule of investments, and the related statements of operationsand of changes in Trust capital and the financial highlights present fairly, inall material respects, the financial position of The Millburn World ResourceTrust at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of its operations, thechanges in trust capital and the financial highlights for each of the threeyears in the period ended December 31, 2001, in conformity with accountingprinciples generally accepted in the United States of America. These financialstatements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as “financialstatements”) are the responsibility of the Managing Owner; our responsibilityis to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. Weconducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with auditingstandards generally accepted in the United States of America, which requirethat we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whetherthe financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesexamining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures inthe financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used andsignificant estimates made by the Managing Owner, and evaluating the overallfinancial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide areasonable basis for our opinion.

 
| New York, New York |   |                        |
|--------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
| February 21, 2002  |   | PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP |

 

----
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00353

- CV

United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Organization United For Respect at Walmart, North Texas Jobs With Justice, Lester Eugene Lantz, and Does 1

- 10

v.

Wal

- Mart Stores, Inc.; Wal

- Mart Real Estate Business Trust; Wal

- Mart Realty Company; Wal

- Mart Stores Texas, LLC; Wal

- Mart Stores East, LP; and Sam’s East, Inc. §

§

§

§ From the 352nd District Court

o f Tarrant County (352

- 266419

- 13 )

April 17, 2014

Opinion by Justice Walker



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is order ed that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed. We further order this court’s October 22, 2013

temporary order, which continued provisions of the trial court’s October 9, 2013

temporary restraining order “until disposition of this interlocutory appea l or until

further order of this court,” dissolved as of 5 p.m. on April 17, 2014, and we deny

as moot “Appellants’ Motion For Expedited Reconsideration Of Temporary

Order.”It is further ordered that appellants United Food and Commercial Workers

Internat ional Union, Organization United For Respect at Walmart, North Texas

Jobs With Justice, Lester Eugene Lantz, and Does 1

- 10 shall pay all of the costs

of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Sue Walker

______ ______________ Justice Sue Walker
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe study of pressure measurement techniques and devices in the range of 10(exp -1) to 10(exp -5) torr (2 millipsi to 0.2 micropsi)The atmospheric pressure range was studied in a region where conventional pressure sensing devices do not provide meaningful measurements. However, a hot filament gauge was developed and miniaturized which will measure the pressure in the 10(exp -1) to 10(exp -5) torr (2 millipsi to 0.2 micropsi) region, hence the name Micropsi gauge. Laboratory studies were made comparing the currently available devices with the newly developed miniature low power 'Micropsi' pressure sensor.Document ID19910002354Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsHoffman, John H.*(Texas Univ. at Dallas Richardson, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 29, 1990Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186926NASA-CR-186926Accession Number91N11667Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-989Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910002354.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024