alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 168 (Friday, August 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23081]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[NM-060-1010-00 (0005)]


Southwest New Mexico Playa Lakes Coordinating Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Southeast New Mexico Playa Lakes coordinating committee 
meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: September 24, 1997, beginning at 9:00 am.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edwin L. Roberson, District Manager, 
Bureau of Land Management, 2909 W. 2nd Street, Roswell, NM 88201, (505) 
627-0242.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Committee is responsible for 
coordinating investigations and mitigation measures needed to resolve 
the issue of wildlife mortality on the playas in southeastern New 
Mexico. The agenda will include review and discussion of the final 
``Investigation of Avian Mortality on Playa Lakes in SE New Mexico'' 
report and what direction the Committee should take to address issues 
and concerns contained in this report. The meeting will be held at the 
Carlsbad Resource Area Office, 620 E. Green, Carlsbad, NM, beginning at 
9:00 a.m. Summary minutes will be maintained in the Roswell District 
Office and will be available for public inspection during regular 
business hours (7:45 a.m.-4:30 p.m.) within 30 days following the 
meeting. Copies will be available for the cost of duplication.

    Dated: August 20, 1997.
Edwin L. Roberson,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-23081 Filed 8-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-VA-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23177]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in the 
Health Care Industry; Notice of Public Meeting

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in the 
Health Care Industry. This two-day meeting will be open to the public, 
limited only by the space available.
    Place of Meeting: The University of Illinois at Chicago, West 
Campus: Chicago Illini Union, 2nd Floor, Chicago Rooms; 828 South 
Wolcott Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60612. Exact locations of the 
sessions will be available at the Union center and on the Commission's 
web site, ``www.hcqualitycommission.gov''.
    Times and Dates: The public meeting will span two days. On Tuesday, 
September 9, 1997, the subcommittee break-out sessions will take place 
from 10:00 a.m. until 4:30 p.m. On Wednesday, September 10, 1997, the 
general plenary session will begin at 8:00 a.m. and it will continue 
until 4:00 p.m.
    Purpose/Agenda: To hear testimony and continue formal proceedings 
of the Commission's four (4) subcommittees. Agenda items are subject to 
change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person: For more information, including substantive program 
information and summaries of the meeting, please contact: Edward (Chip) 
Malin, Hubert Humphrey Building, Room 118F, 200 Independence Avenue, 
S.W., Washington, DC 20201; [202/205-3333].

    Dated: August 25, 1997.
Richard Sorian,
Deputy Director, Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality 
in the Health Care Industry.
[FR Doc. 97-23177 Filed 8-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4110-60-M
– (CF 2 - CF 2 ) a – (CF 2 - CFCl) b – (CF 2 - CF) c – │

OC 3 F 7

a = 0.66 – 0.81, b = 0.27 – 0.15, c = 0.07 – 0.02
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4518-4519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2294]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service


National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory Council

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory Council 
will meet in Charleston, South Carolina, February 27 through March 1, 
1997. The Council is comprised of 15 members appointed by the Secretary 
of Agriculture. The meeting will be chaired by Genni Cross of The Trust 
for Public Land/California ReLeaf. The purpose of the meeting is to 
discuss emerging issues in Urban and Community Forestry and to review 
status reports on the Council's annual report. The meeting is open to 
the public, and time will be provided at the beginning of each major 
agenda topic for public input. In order to provide input, individuals 
must request time to speak and must specify topic(s) to be addressed by 
February 7, 1997. Council discussion is limited to Council members and 
Forest Service staff.

[[Page 4519]]

Persons who wish to bring urban and community forestry matters to the 
attention of the Council may file written statements with the Council 
staff before or after the meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held February 28 through March 1, 1997. A 
tour of local projects will take place on February 27, 9:00-3:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Fulton Lane Inn, 202 King 
Street, Charleston, South Carolina.
    Send written statements and/or proposed agenda items to Suzanne M. 
del Villar, Executive Assistant, National Urban and Community Forestry 
Advisory Council, 1042 Park West Court, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne M. del Villar, Cooperative 
Forestry Staff, (970) 928-9264.

    Dated: January 24, 1997.
Joan M. Comanor,
Deputy Chief.
[FR Doc. 97-2294 Filed 1-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
**How do I get print copies of a report?**

Print copies of a report need to be ordered. All ERS, NASS and WAOB    printed reports are available from the ERS-NASS sales order desk. A list of NASS reports    and their subscription prices along with ERS periodicals are listed on the inside back    cover of the ERS-NASS Catalog. Prices vary by report. 

The ERS-NASS    Catalog is available on the Internet and in print. The printed version is published    annually and is available from the ERS-NASS Order Desk by dialing 1-800-999-6779.

 

Back to FAQs
 

USDA Economicsand Statistics SystemAlbert R. Mann Library, Cornell UniversityComments and questions to [email protected]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Northstar Ventures, Inc. (the 'Company"), hereby
certify, that to the best of my knowledge, the
Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date: October 29, 2002

/s/ Dempsey Mork
--------------------
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

JT/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROSA AMELIA URIBE BEDOYA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-72825

Agency No. A070-962-709

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 16, 2010** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Rosa Amelia Uribe-Bedoya, a native and citizen of Columbia, petitions pro

se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order denying her application

for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. 

FILED

FEB 26 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
JT/Research 2 07-72825

We review de novo questions of law. Aguilar Gonzales v. Mukasey, 534 F.3d

1204, 1208 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review. 

Contrary to her contention, the agency did not deny Uribe-Bedoya’s

cancellation application on the basis of her expunged 1997 conviction. UribeBedoya has waived any challenge to the agency’s conclusion that her three 2001

convictions were crimes involving moral turpitude which precluded her from

demonstrating good moral character and rendered her ineligible for cancellation of

removal. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256-1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996). 

We therefore need not reach Uribe-Bedoya’s remaining contentions

concerning hardship and continuous physical presence. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 168 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 168

  To reauthorize additional contract authority for States with Indian 
                             reservations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 26, 2005

  Mr. Bingaman (for himself and Mr. Bennett) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reauthorize additional contract authority for States with Indian 
                             reservations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Indian School Bus Route Safety 
Reauthorization Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL CONTRACT AUTHORITY FOR STATES 
              WITH INDIAN RESERVATIONS.

    Section 1214(d)(5)(A) of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st 
Century (23 U.S.C. 202 note; 112 Stat. 206) is amended by striking 
``$1,500,000 for each of fiscal years 1998 through 2003'' and inserting 
``$1,800,000 for each of fiscal years 2005 through 2010''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Sandra J. LOSCO, Appellant, v. James R. LOSCO, Appellee.

No. BB-274.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 19, 1977.

Gerald R. Power, Jacksonville, for appellant.

S. Gordon Blalock of Blalock, Holbrook, Lewis, Paul & Isaac, Jacksonville, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage, the wife’s sole complaint is that the trial judge erred by only awarding her the sum of $37.50 per week rehabilitative alimony for one year. We agree and reverse.

The record reflects that this marriage of 20 years produced three children, one child having attained the age of majority since the trial of the cause. The husband is a skilled plumber and, during the three years prior to dissolution, earned in excess of $20,000 per year. At the time of the marriage, the wife was 15 years old, did not work outside of the home during the marital period, and thus had not attained any skills in the marketplace. An equitable division of the material assets accumulated during the marriage was entered by the trial judge which left each of the marital parties with approximately $20,000 cash. The wife was awarded possession of the marital home (with the privilege of paying the mortgage payments) until the youngest minor child attained majority or until the wife remarried. Child support in the sum of $50.00 per week for each child was directed to be paid by the husband.

The wife, who possessed no marketable skills at the time of dissolution, was confronted with expending a substantial portion of her share of the assets accumulated by the marital partners during their 20-year venture in pursuing educational opportunities to attain the necessary skills to enter the marketplace. Such skills were possessed and pursued by the husband during the marital venture.

Taking these factors into consideration, the cause is reversed1 with directions that the judgment appealed be amended to direct the husband to pay $37.50 per week rehabilitative alimony to the wife for a period of two years from the 23rd day of February, 1976, that being the date of the final judgment.

McCORD, C. J., and RAWLS and SMITH, JJ., concur.

1

. *Brown*v. *Brown,*300 So.2d 719 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974).
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1710 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1710

    To amend section 255 of the National Housing Act to remove the 
limitation on the number of reverse mortgages that may be insured under 
         the FHA mortgage insurance program for such mortgages.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 15, 2005

Mr. Santorum (for himself and Mr. Crapo) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend section 255 of the National Housing Act to remove the 
limitation on the number of reverse mortgages that may be insured under 
         the FHA mortgage insurance program for such mortgages.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reverse Mortgages to Help America's 
Seniors Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF CAP ON NUMBER OF MORTGAGES INSURED.

    Section 255 of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715z-20) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (g), by striking the first sentence; and
            (2) in subsection (i)(1)(C), by striking ``limitations'' 
        and inserting ``limitation''.
                                 <all>
```
### Re: Missing words (typo) in Question 6.3

DavidJ

Miller to: Sharlene Matten 01/27/2011 07:49 PM

Cc: Laura Bailey, Anna Lowit, Chester Rodriguez, Jack Fowle

Sharlene,

In producing the final transmittal letter, a few words were apparently accidentally deleted from the

question. After discussions here, the question should read:



### The current effort by DAS is limited to food exposure and does not include all relevant

exposure routes . Please comment on strengths and weaknesses of using data

- derived

extrapolation factors described in the current effort for lifestages (e.g., gestation or

pregnancy) and/or for routes (dermal, inhalation) not considered in the current

modeling effort.

T hank you for alerting us to this.

david.

________________________________

David J. Miller, Chief

Chemistry & Exposure Branch

Health Effects Division

Office of Pesticide Programs

703

- 305

- 5352 (voice)

703

- 305

- 5147 (fax)

visit: http://www.epa.gov/pest icides/

From: Sharlene Matten/DC/USEPA/US

To: DavidJ Miller/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Laura Bailey/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/20/2011 06:44 PM

Subject: Missing words (typo) in Question 6.3

Hi David, There are a couple of typos in Question 6.3 (see below in bold):"The current effort by DAS is limited to food exposure and does not include all [ something missing here ]

Please comment on [the] strengths and weaknesses of using data

- derived extrapolation fact ors

described in the current effort for lifestages (e.g., gestation or pregnancy) and/or for routes (dermal,

inhalation) not considered in the current modeling efforts.

I presume the missing language should be:" include all routes of exposure." I think a lso there is a "the"

missing before "strengths." An email clarifying the wording of Question 6.3 will be sufficient.

Thank you.

Sharlene

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Sharlene R. Matten, Ph.D.

Biologist

Designated Federal Official

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Staff

USEPA/OSCP (7201M)

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW

Washington D.C. 20460

Tel: 202

- 564

- 0130

Fax: 202

- 564

- 8382

E

- mail: matten.sharlene@epa.gov

Courier Mail:

USEPA/OSCP

EPA East Building, RM 4207

1201 Constitution Ave., NW

Washington D.C. 20004
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Image Sensing System, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Arthur J. Bourgeois, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




                                 /s/ Arthur J. Bourgeois
                                 -------------------------------------------
                                 Arthur J. Bourgeois
                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                 March 28, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7169

RICARDO EDWIN LANIER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

J. BURNS, Sheriff Officer, Henderson County Sheriff’s Office; Z. CAPPS, Sheriff 

Officer, Henderson County Sheriff’s Office,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:22-cv-00078-MR)

Submitted: July 25, 2023 Decided: July 27, 2023

Before WYNN and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricardo Edwin Lanier, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7169 Doc: 15 Filed: 07/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Ricardo Edwin Lanier seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing all of 

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims except for his excessive force claim, which the court allowed 

to proceed, and denying his requests for reconsideration of the dismissal order. He also 

seeks to appeal the district court’s subsequent orders denying his motion to change venue 

because of the district court judge’s alleged bias and denying various types of relief he 

requested in several letters to the court. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). 

The orders Lanier seeks to appeal are neither final nor appealable interlocutory or collateral 

orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7169 Doc: 15 Filed: 07/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1


                                  EXHIBIT 23.1
                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 21,
1999, which calls attention to assertions by the U.S. Small Business
Administration of violations of its Rules and Regulations, on our audits of the
financial statements included in the filing on Form 10-K, of Walnut Financial
Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of and for the years ended December 31, 1998
and 1997 and in its Registration Statements No. 33-99718 and 33-00516 on Form
S-8 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (i) on November 16,
1995, and (ii) on January 19, 1996, respectively.


Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP
New York, New York
April 13, 1999
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1670 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Isododecane. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Isododecane. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON ISODODECANE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.39.14 Isododecane (CAS No. 

31807–55–3) (provided for 

in subheading 2710.11.90) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 
2 

•S 1670 IS

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22773]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3232-000]


The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company; Notice of Filing

August 21, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 8, 1997, The Cleveland Electric 
Illuminating Company tendered for filing an amendment in the above-
referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 285.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before August 29, 1997. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22773 Filed 8-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M