alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, William J. Carden, certify that:1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-K of American Spectrum Realty, Inc.; 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting;5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions); a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: November 8, 2007            By: *     /s/ William J. Carden*            William J. Carden           Chief Executive Officer  
27
# EUR-Lex - 51998IP1078 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 51998IP1078

**Resolution on child soldiers **

*
Official Journal C 098 , 09/04/1999 P. 0297 *

B4-1078, 1109, 1137, 1141 and 1155/98

Resolution on child soldiers

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the 1989 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child,

- having regard to the 1996 UN report of Mrs Graça Machel (A/51/306) and the appointment of Mr Olara Otunnu as UN Special Representative on the impact of armed conflict on children,

A. whereas more than 300 000 children under the age of 18 are currently taking part in hostilities around the world and many more have been recruited,

B. whereas children suffer disproportionately from the general rigours of military life, both physically and emotionally,

C. whereas since 1993 a UN working group has been considering an optional protocol to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, establishing 18 as the minimum age for recruitment in armed forces,

D. welcoming the creation of an 'international coalition' to put an end to the use of child soldiers in the world,

E. whereas four EU Member States to date have a minimum age for recruitment set at 18: Belgium, Denmark, Spain and Sweden,

F. whereas the July 1998 Rome Statute of an International Criminal Court for the first time established that the recruitment and use of child soldiers under the age of 15 constitute a war crime,

G. welcoming the new UN policy regarding minimum ages for participation in UN operations by UN peacekeepers, military observers and civilian police,

1. Rejects the use in hostilities of child soldiers, be it by regular government forces or by armed opposition groups;

2. Believes that an additional protocol to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child should urgently be adopted which bans the recruitment of children under 18 and their participation in armed conflicts, and calls on the European Union to support international initiatives to this end and to adopt the same laws in their own countries;

3. Calls on the UN working group to urgently complete its task of drafting an optional protocol to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and calls on the Council to agree a Joint Action in order to promote the adoption of this optional protocol and make the fight against the use of child soldiers part of the Union's policy;

4. Calls on the Commission to direct resources for the demobilization and reintegration into society of children who have participated in armed conflicts;

5. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments of the Member States, the UN Special Representative on the impact of armed conflict on children and the UN Human Rights Commission.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T G A RY ECCH ER, P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. K A TH Y M EN D O ZA - PO W ERS, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 07- 55437 D . C . N o . C V - 0 6 - 0 0 8 4 2 - R S WL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia R ona l d S . W . L e w , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a y24, 2011 ** B efo re: P R E G E R S O N , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C alifo rn ia state p riso n erG ary E cc h erap p ea ls p ro se fr o m th e d istrict co u rt’s j u d g m en td en yi n g h i s 2 8 U . S . C . § 2 2 5 4 h ab eas p et i t i o n . W e d i sm i ss. E c c he rc ont e nds tha tthe B oa r d’ s 2003 de c i s i on t o de nyhi m pa r ol e w a s not supp ort ed by “ som e e vi dence” and there fore vi ol at ed hi s due proces s r i gh t s. A ft er 

# FI LED JU N 6 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 55437 2 br i e f i ng w a s c om pl e t e d i n thi s c a s e , thi s c ourthe l d tha tac e rt i f i c a t e of ap p e a lab ility( “C O A ” ) is r e q u ir e dto c h a lle n g e th e d e n ia l o f p a r o le . See H

a yw a rd v . M a rs h a ll , 6 0 3 F. 3 d5 4 6 , 5 5 4 - 5 5 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 1 0 ) ( e n b a n c ) . N o w th e Sup r e me C o u rt h a s h e ldth a t th e o n lyf e d e r a l r ig h t a t is s u e in th e p a r o le c o n te x t is pr oc e dur a l , a nd the onl ypr ope ri nqui ryi s w ha tpr oc e s s the i nm a t e r e c e i ve d, not w h e th e rth e s ta te c o u rt d e c id e dth e c a s e c o rr e c tly . See Sw artho utv. C oo ke , 1 3 1 S. C t . 85 9, 86 3 (20 11 ) ( per c uri am ). A C O A cann oti ss ue on E cc her’ s c on t ent i on that the B oa r d’ s de c i s i on w a s nots upport e d by“ s om e e vi de nc e , ” a nd w e di s m i s s the ap p e a l f o rla c ko f

ju r is d ic tio n . See 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 3 ( c ) ( 2 ) . F urther, because E cc her has no thas m ade asubst ant i alshow i ng of the deni al o f ac o n s titu tio n a l r ig h t, w e d e c lin e to c e rtif yh is r e m a in in g c la im s . Id . A p p e lle e ’s m o tio n to d is m is s th e c a s e is d e n ie da s m o o t. DI S MI S S E D.
#### William RUSSO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-629.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 14, 1970.

Miller & Russell, Miami, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Harold Mendelow, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was informed against by an information charging him with conspiracy to commit robbery, contrary to the provisions of § 833.04, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. He was convicted by a jury, adjudicated guilty, and sentenced to seven years’ confinement in the State penitentiary pursuant to the provisions of § 833.03, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. He has appealed and assigned error as to the sufficiency of the evidence, error in the trial court instructing the jury as to the provisions of § 833.03, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., and error in sentencing him under the latter section rather than that contained in the information.

We find ample, competent, and sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict and we will not disturb same. Crum v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 24; Dunnaway v. State, Fla.App.1968, 208 So.2d 840; Sylvia v. State, Fla.App.1968, 210 So.2d 286. Without any amendments to the information, the court erred in giving § 833.03, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., as an instruction to the jury rather than the section charged to have been violated in the information.1

An examination of the charges in toto and the particular language of §§ 833.03, 833.04, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., as to the substantive crime charged therein [the pri*20mary difference being the sentence involved], leads us to the conclusion that this error was harmless. Coggins v. State, Fla.App.1958, 101 So.2d 400; Casso v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 252; Mathews v. State, Fla.App.1969,221 So.2d 431; § 924.33, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. However, we find that the trial court did err in sentencing under a section not referred to in the information and, therefore, we will return the matter to the trial court for an appropriate sentence under § 833.04, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.

The verdict and final judgment of conviction are hereby affirmed. The sentence is hereby set aside, and the cause and the appellant are remanded to the trial court for an appropriate sentence in accordance with the views above expressed.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part, with directions.

1

. The State urges that the objections to the form of the information were waived by the provisions of Rules 1.140(d) (1), 1.140 (o), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F.S.A. This is not applicable in the instant case because the defendant was not aware that the trial court was going to charge under another statute until the end of the trial, at which time he made appropriate objection.
# L_2023195EN.01005601.xml

| 3.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 195/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 195/56

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/1562 of 27 July 2023 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2323 establishing the European List of ship recycling facilities pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1257/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 190 of 28 July 2023
  ).

In the Annex, on pages 35, 37 and 41, in the rightmost column:

for:

‘
  20 August 2028
  ’,

read:

‘
  17 August 2028
  ’.

---
# DLA Energy receives Department of Energy contracting award

/ Published Nov. 24, 2017
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia, The Department of Energy recognized Defense Logistics Agency Energy Installation Energy with the 2017 Federal Energy and Water Management Contracting Award at an awards ceremony in Washington, D.C., Nov. 2.  The ceremony honored 27 individuals and teams across 11 federal and Department of Defense organizations. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) in conjunction with the Interagency Management Task Force, sponsors the annual Federal Energy and Water Management Awards, which recognize individuals and organizations for significant contributions and outstanding achievements in energy and water efficiency, renewable energy implementation, sustainable practices, and fleet and transportation management. The winners of the 2017 awards contributed to saving approximately 6.5 trillion British thermal units (Btu) of energy, 1.1 million gallons of water, $191.5 million in energy and water costs, and offset 96.7 billion Btu of electricity generated from fossil fuels through the generation and use of renewable energy.The DLA Energy Installation Energy team received the ‘contracting’ award for its role as the contracting agent for the Fort Hood renewable energy project. The contract was the first DOD hybrid solar and wind renewable energy contract award and is the largest single renewable energy project awarded to date by DLA Energy, encompassing more than 60,000 solar panels and 50 megawatts of wind generation. “The team will tell you that this project effort was just another day at the office, but it represented a significant achievement in establishing a contract pathway for executing these complex efforts,” said DLA Energy Installation Energy Director Pam Griffith. “We now have new standards of practice and strategies we can use to expand the supply of renewable energy and improve the energy resilience of our installations.”The Fort Hood renewable energy project also supports the Army’s 2017 Installation Energy and Water Security policy by assuring access to redundant and diverse supply sources, providing reliable infrastructure, and ensuring effective system operation, Griffith said. Another notable aspect of the effort is the expected cost benefit to Fort Hood and the Army.  “We estimate the Army will realize $168 million in cost avoidance, as compared to the projected cost of fossil fuel generation, over the 29 year contract term,” said Contracting Officer Andrea Kincaid. Pam Griffith, Larry Fratis and Chris Archer were in attendance to receive the award. Other team members include Andrea Kincaid and Brandee Hynson along with Christopher Colby and Kelly Tischler from DLA Energy’s Office of Counsel. “It was an honor to receive this award and recognition from DOE and our energy colleagues for the outstanding effort put forth by our team,” said Griffith. “We look forward to supporting the energy needs of our customers with innovative approaches to ensure a resilient and secure force.”
# EUR-Lex - 42002D0595 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 42002D0595

**2002/595/EC: Decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, of 19 July 2002 on the consequences of the expiry of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) Treaty on international agreements concluded by the ECSC **

*
Official Journal L 194 , 23/07/2002 P. 0035 - 0035 *

Decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council

of 19 July 2002

on the consequences of the expiry of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) Treaty on international agreements concluded by the ECSC

(2002/595/EC)

THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN COAL AND STEEL COMMUNITY, MEETING WITHIN THE COUNCIL,

Whereas:

(1) By virtue of Article 97 thereof, the ECSC Treaty will expire on 23 July 2002.

(2) A number of international agreements with third countries have been concluded by the ECSC.

(3) Those agreements do not provide for the eventuality of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty.

(4) The subject matter covered by the ECSC Treaty will, upon its expiry, be covered by the Treaty establishing the European Community.

(5) It is in the interests of the ECSC and the sectors concerned that those international agreements should remain in force beyond the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and should therefore devolve on the European Community,

HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

As from 24 July 2002, the rights and obligations arising under the international agreements concluded by the ECSC shall be taken over by the European Community.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Decision shall apply from 24 July 2002.

Done at Brussels, 19 July 2002.

The President

T. Pedersen
# L_2010014EN.01001201.xml

| 20.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 14/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 14/12

---

DECISION OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES

of 30 November 2009

appointing an Advocate-General to the Court of Justice of the European Communities

(2010/33/EC, Euratom)

THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 223 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 139 thereof,

Whereas, by virtue of Articles 7 and 8 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice and following the death of Mr Dámaso Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, an Advocate-General should be appointed to the Court of Justice of the European Communities for the remainder of Mr Dámaso Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer’s term of office, which runs until 6 October 2015,

HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Pedro Cruz Villalón is hereby appointed an Advocate-General to the Court of Justice of the European Communities for the period from 30 November 2009 to 6 October 2015.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 November 2009.

The President

B. ASK

---
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Thomas Equipment, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Clifford M. Rhee, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. .
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated:  January 17, 2006                         By:  /s/ CLIFFORD M. RHEE
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Clifford M. Rhee
                                                      President
#### Will MARSHALL et ux. v. SULLIVAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., et al.

No. 50782.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 9, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 23, 1978.

*343Laurel G. Weir, Philadelphia, for appellants.

Hathorn & Hathorn, J. Hoy Hathorn, Louisville, for appellees.

Before WALKER, BROOM and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### Warren Edward DULIERE, Appellant, v. Byron P. GEORGE, Appellee.

No. 68-405.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

April 23, 1969.

William L. Penrose, of Harris, Barrett, Dew & Sieber, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Stephen D. Hughes, Largo, for appellee.

*46PER CURIAM.

Appellant, plaintiff below, appeals a final judgment entered for appellee, defendant below. The judgment appealed was entered by the trial court sitting without a jury.

It is incumbent upon an appellant to show reversible error to overcome the presumption of correctness of the trial court’s final judgment. This the appellant has failed to do.

We have reviewed the record-on-appeal and carefully studied the briefs of the respective parties and find that the judgment appealed is supported by competent substantial evidence which accords with logic and reason and, therefore, the judgment appealed is

Affirmed.

LILES, C. J., and HOBSON and MANN, JJ., concur.
Guam National Guard Plays Role in Moving Supplies to Saipan
 
  By  Petty Officer 2nd Class Joshua Mortensen
                   Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command website.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1727 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1727

To provide grants for prosecutions of cases cleared through use of DNA 
                        backlog clearance fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 20, 2005

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide grants for prosecutions of cases cleared through use of DNA 
                        backlog clearance fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Grants for DNA Backlog Prosecutions 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ASSISTANCE FOR PROSECUTIONS OF CASES CLEARED THROUGH USE OF DNA 
              BACKLOG CLEARANCE FUNDS.

    The Justice for All Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-405) is amended by 
adding after section 206 the following new section:

``SEC. 207. ASSISTANCE FOR PROSECUTIONS OF CASES CLEARED THROUGH USE OF 
              DNA BACKLOG CLEARANCE FUNDS.

    ``(a) In General.--The Attorney General shall make grants to train 
and employ personnel to help prosecute cases cleared through use of 
funds provided for DNA backlog elimination.
    ``(b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated $100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 through 2010 to 
carry out this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Interest of Wendy RIVERS, a minor by Frances Rivers Ansley v. Larry RIVERS, W. D. Moore, Jr., County Prosecuting Attorney and Youth Counselor, Neshoba County Department of Public Welfare.

No. 50753.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 2, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 23, 1978.

Laurel G. Weir, Philadelphia, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Carolyn B. Mills, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and WALKER and COFER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


	In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Spirit Gaming Ltd.
	(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005
	as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
	Robert Klein, President and Carlton Parfitt the Chief Financial Officer
	of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
	pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
	best of their knowledge:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects the financial condition and results of the Company.

November 21, 2005

	By: /s/ Robert Klein
	----------------------
	Robert Klein, President