alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1536 

To provide certain members of the Armed Forces with a deferment of all 

loan payments under title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, 

and to provide such members with the option to reenroll in institutions 

of higher education after completion of their service. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 28, 2005 

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself, Mr. KENNEDY, and Mrs. CLINTON) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL

To provide certain members of the Armed Forces with a 

deferment of all loan payments under title IV of the 

Higher Education Act of 1965, and to provide such 

members with the option to reenroll in institutions of 

higher education after completion of their service.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Loan Manageability 

5 for Armed Forces in Higher Eucation Act’’. 
2

•S 1536 IS

1 SEC. 2. STUDENT LOAN DEFERMENT FOR CERTAIN MEM2 BERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

3 Part G of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 

4 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1088 et seq.) is amended by adding at 

5 the end the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 494. STUDENT LOAN DEFERMENT FOR CERTAIN MEM7 BERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

8 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act— 

9 ‘‘(1) a member of the Armed Forces serving in 

10 a combat operation or combat zone, as designated by 

11 the Secretary of Defense, or a member of a reserve 

12 component of the Armed Forces who is serving pur13 suant to a call or order to active duty for a period 

14 of more than 30 days, shall be eligible for a 

15 deferment of any loan made, insured, or guaranteed 

16 under this title, under which periodic installments of 

17 principal need not be paid, but interest shall accrue 

18 and be paid by the Secretary, during the period of 

19 such service and for 6 months after such period; and 

20 ‘‘(2) each institution of higher education that 

21 participates in any program under this title shall 

22 provide, to each student who is enrolled in the insti23 tution at the commencement of such service, the op24 tion to reenroll in the institution after the comple25 tion of such service.’’.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1750

NANCY C. MORRIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WASTE MANAGEMENT OF VIRGINIA, INCORPORATED,

d/b/a Waste Management of Hampton Roads,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. William T. Prince, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-99-385-2)

Submitted: December 29, 2000 Decided: January 17, 2001

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Scott Meadows Reed, PRESTON & REED, P.L.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellant. Lawrence P. Postol, SEYFARTH SHAW, Washington,

D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
1 This case was decided by a magistrate judge upon consent of

the parties under 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c)(1) (West 1993 & Supp. 2000).

2 We note that Morris did not present her argument that the

“General Release and Settlement Agreement” proposed by Employer

violates the prohibition against the waiver of future claims

contained in 29 U.S.C.A. § 626(f)(1)(C) (West 2000) to the district

court. We therefore do not address this argument on appeal. Muth

v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993).

2

PER CURIAM:

Nancy C. Morris filed suit against her former employer, Waste

Management of Virginia, Inc., d/b/a Waste Management of Hampton

Roads (“Employer”), alleging sexual discrimination, in violation of

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and age discrimination,

in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”).

She now appeals the magistrate judge’s order enforcing a settlement

agreement, releasing her discrimination claims, and dismissing the

action.1

On appeal, Morris argues that the magistrate judge erred in

finding that Morris knowingly and voluntarily waived and released

her age discrimination claim and that the magistrate judge improperly concluded that an enforceable settlement agreement existed

between the parties. We have reviewed the magistrate’s opinion and

the submitted materials in light of Morris’ claims, and find no

reversible error.2 Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

magistrate judge. Morris v. Waste Mgmt. of Virginia, No. CA-99-
3 Although the magistrate judge’s order is marked as filed on

May 19, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was entered

on the docket sheet on May 22, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58 and

79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that

the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

3

385-2 (E.D. Va. May 22, 2000).3 We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# L_2023162EN.01000101.xml

| 28.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 162/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 162/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/1308

of 21 June 2023

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Novigradska dagnja’ (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia’s application to register the name ‘Novigradska dagnja’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia’s application to register the name ‘Novigradska dagnja’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Novigradska dagnja’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Novigradska dagnja’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Novigradska dagnja’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.7. Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 June 2023.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 80, 3.3.2023, p. 84.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 176 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.176

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
      To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
              hydroelectric project in the State of Alaska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 
              PROJECT.

    Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 11480, the 
Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the project, and 
after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due 
diligence, and public interest requirements of that section and the 
Commission's procedures under that section extend the time period 
during which the licensee is required to commence the construction of 
the project for 3 consecutive 2-year periods beyond the date that is 4 
years after the date of issuance of the license.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
MIRANDA GOLD CORP.

750 West Pender Street, Unit 1200

Vancouver, B.C. V6C 2T8



Tel: (604) 687-4747



----



Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Miranda
Gold Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Joseph P. Hebert, as President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
to the best of his knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Dated:	December 21, 2018



“signed” Joseph P. Hebert

____________________________________________________

Joseph P. Hebert

President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff, upon request.
# L_2023204EN.01000101.xml

| 17.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 204/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 204/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/1636

of 10 August 2023

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Cerdo de Teruel’ (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Cerdo de Teruel’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Cerdo de Teruel’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Cerdo de Teruel’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Cerdo de Teruel’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Cerdo de Teruel’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.1. Fresh meat (and offal), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 August 2023.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 138, 21.4.2023, p. 17.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
#### Myers *v.*Consumers’ Coal Company.

*Equity*— Findings *of facts*— Review—Appeals.

The appellate court will not interfere with a chancellor’s findings of facts made on sufficient evidence unless he is convicted of clear and manifest error.

Argued April 11, 1910.

Appeal, No. 176, Jan. T., 1909, by plaintiffs, from decree of C. P. Luzerne Co., March T., 1900, No. 2, dismissing bill in equity in case of E. Oscar Myers et al. v. The Consumers’ Coal Company et al.

Before Fell, C. J., Brown, Mestrezat, Potter, Elkin, Stewart and Moschzisker, JJ.

Affirmed.

Bill in equity. See 212 Pa. 193.

*445May 24, 1910:

*Error assigned*was decree dismissing the bill.

*George R. Bedford, Alexander Famham, S. J. Strauss*and *Hon. Edmund W. Burke,*for appellants.

*Henry W. Palmer, Frank W. Wheaton and Felix Ansart,*for appellees.

Per Curiam,

When this case was here before, 212 Pa. 193, it was on an appeal from the decision of a single judge and not from the decree of the court. After pointing out the error in the procedure, and holding that the appeal should have been from the decree of the court in banc, we formally sustained one of the assignments, and sent the case back to the trial court with the suggestion that the “rulings (of the court) may not be in accord with those of the single judge who entered this decree, after a trial had in accordance with the views expressed above.” The court below construed our judgment “as a direction that another trial should be had,” and, with some additional testimony, the case was again heard by the chancellor and the court in banc from whose decree this appeal was taken. Every question of fact and law has been most carefully considered by the court and we are not prepared to say that, on the evidence submitted in the case, it has committed reversible error. Had we been sitting as the chancellor we might have found some of the facts differently, but that does not warrant a reversal. Under the well-established rule, we will not interfere with a chancellor’s findings made on sufficient evidence unless he is convicted of clear and manifest error. The record does not disclose such error, and, hence, the assignments must be overruled and the appeal be dismissed.

Decree affirmed.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

GEORGE ESTEVES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-2089

[October 5, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 95-769 CF10A.

George Esteves, Wewachitchka, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Access and System / Report    and Data Set Content / Data Development and Interpretation

**Access and System questions:**

> 
For questions about the use of this system, access methods, and your comments and      suggestions for system improvement you can contact Mann Library.   

Mann Library generally answers USDA email reference questions that can be answered only      with the resources on the USDA System, unless you are a member of the current Cornell      community.  If you have a USDA or agricultural question this is outside of the scope      of the System, it is best to contact the USDA or particular issuing agency. You can also      try your local library.  Links to the USDA and agencies are listed on the header of      this page as well as further down this page.  

Albert R. Mann Library      Cornell University      Ithaca, NY 14853-4301      Phone: (607) 255-5406[email protected]

**Report and data set content questions:**
For questions about the content of reports and data sets on the System****please      get in touch with the the issuing agency directly.  Below is a list of the agencies      represented on the System. 

**Economic Research Service** prepares data about the      economic value of domestic and foreign agricultural products. ERS publishes several      Situation and Outlook reports and many of the Data-sets available by the server.

Information Center       Economic Research Service       Room 3100       1800 M St. N.W.       Washington, DC 20036       Phone: 202-694-5050 Fax: 202-694-5718 [email protected]

**National Agricultural Statistics Service** prepares data about the      domestic production of agricultural products. NASS published many commodity Reports and      several major Data-sets such as Crops County Data.

National Agricultural Statistics Service       Room 5805-South       Washington, DC 20250       Phone: 1-800-727-9540       Fax: 202-690-1311 [email protected]

**World Agricultural Outlook Board** prepares regular forecasts of      domestic and world supply-and-demand prospects for major agricultural commodities.

World Agricultural Outlook Board       Room 5143-South       Washington, DC 20250       Phone: 202-720-5447       Fax: 202-690-1805 [email protected]

**Data development or interpretation:**

Questions concerning the development or interpretation of data sets should be addressed      to the subject-area data specialist identified in the README file. You should contact these specialists when you have a content-related question,      such as units of measure, survey methods, missing data, etc.

 
USDA Economics and Statistics System
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2291]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Notice of Receipt of Applications for Permit

    The following applicants have applied for a permit to conduct 
certain activities with endangered species. This notice is provided 
pursuant to Section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531, et seq.):

PRT-802636

Applicant: Parker Creek Ranch, San Antonio TX.

    The applicant requests renewal of a permit to authorize interstate 
and foreign commerce, export, and cull of excess male barasingha 
(Cervus duvauceli), red lechwe (Kobus leche), and Eld's brow-antlered 
deer (Cervus eldi) from his captive herd for the purpose of enhancement 
of survival of the species. This notice shall cover a period of three 
years. Permittee must apply for renewal annually.

PRT-803337

Applicant: Thomas J. Moore, III, Ingram, TX.

    The applicant requests renewal of a permit to authorize interstate 
and foreign commerce, export, and cull of excess male barasingha 
(Cervus duvauceli) from his captive herd for the purpose of enhancement 
of survival of the species. This notice shall cover a period of three 
years. Permittee must apply for renewal annually.

PRT-824266

Applicant: David C. Eldridge, Mt. Zion, IL.

    The applicant requests a permit to import the sport-hunted trophy 
of one male bontebok (Damaliscus pygargus dorcas) culled from a captive 
herd maintained under the management program of the Republic of South 
Africa, for the purpose of enhancement of the survival of the species.
    Written data or comments should be submitted to the Director, U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North 
Fairfax Drive, Room 430, Arlington, Virginia 22203 and must be received 
by the Director within 30 days of the date of this publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with these applications 
are available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy 
Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the following office within 30 
days of the date of publication of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 
430, Arlington, Virginia 22203. Phone: (703/358-2104); FAX: (703/358-
2281).

    Dated: January 24, 1997.
Caroline Anderson,
Acting Chief, Branch of Permits, Office of Management Authority.
[FR Doc. 97-2291 Filed 1-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P