alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LI Kuri ~ q" 

ia Kvri a) a-ol -com 

EPA Testimony — 

Hi, my name is Lia Kurihara and I am a Global Warming Program intern at Environment 

America. I am here today because I want the EPA to know why the Clean Power Plan is so 

important to myself, my family and my generation. 

When I was 8 years old Hurricane Isabel ripped branches from my neighborhood trees and 

drowned my house with rain. That was 11 years ago and I still remember being scared so I can't 

even imagine what the people affected by Katrina or Sandy went through. Nature is more 

powerful than us and we don't get to see that from day to day. When it over takes our 

infrastructure and our lives it is overwhelming and provides us a reminder that we cannot mess 

with the environment because being out of control and at the will of extreme weather systems 

does not leave us with a bright future. 

The EPA should finalize its proposed Clean Power Plan. We have knowledge that past 

generations didn't have, we have support that past generations didn't have and the future 

generations will be even more united in this cause. We can't let the politics that dirty polluters 

and climate deniers play get in the way of trying to save this planet! We need this proposedl~an, 

to become a reality so that we can become a part of the ecosystem rather than an intruder. 

Besides reductions in carbon pollution, the Clean Power Plan will also promote investments in 

efficiency and renewable energy sources like wind and solar, creating the jobs of the future and 

building an energy infrastructure that is safer and healthier. Yes, the coal industry provides many 

jobs but those jobs are not sustainable! People my age don't want to enter a dying industry. 

People my age want to be working in the next big thing. I expect the green industry to expand 

even more by the time my class is starting on their career path. 

Growing up in Maryland, I would go almost every summer to my grandpa's bay house right on 

the Chesapeake Bay in southern Maryland. We'd go crabbing and fishing every time I visited. 

The bay area is threatened by flooding and inundation from climate change. The crabs and fish 

that I used to enjoy catching and feasting on won't be able to live in the warmer and saltier water 

that is predicted to plague the East Coast unless we do something. I don't want my childhood 

haven to become a swampy mess. I don't want my favorite Maryland blue crabs to disappear. 

The Clean Power Plan needs to be finalized not only for my children but for my generation. The 

effects of climate change have already started and I am not even 20 years old yet. My generation 

was given this world, this problem, and while we did not make the decisions that got us in this 

situation, it will be up to us to get us out. Help my generation and my kids' generation clean this 

mess up now. Finalize the Clean Power Plan. 

Thank you.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,782,839
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       3,136,847
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 14,628,590
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         756,846
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           756,846
<LOANS>                                    175,732,907
<ALLOWANCE>                                (1,194,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             199,368,597
<DEPOSITS>                                 107,549,786
<SHORT-TERM>                                52,424,170
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,004,495
<LONG-TERM>                                 11,097,512
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,821
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,270,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             199,368,597
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             13,167,279
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              953,850
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               194,647
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            14,315,776
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,547,834
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,950,197
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,365,579
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  265,300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,062,323
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,603,542
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,192,979
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,192,979
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.37
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.63
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,166,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           (1,027,300)
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  136,000
<RECOVERIES>                                  (38,000)
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          (1,194,000)
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,042,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        152,000


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification  Pursuant  to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. ss.1350)

I, Beaufort J.B.  Clarke,  Chairman and Chief Executive  Officer of ICON Capital
Corp.,  the General  Partner of the Registrant in connection  with the Quarterly
Report of ICON Income Fund Eight B L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report") certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Quarterly  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78m); and

2.   The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.


Dated:   August 21, 2006

 /s/ Beaufort J.B. Clarke
----------------------------------
Beaufort J.B. Clarke
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
ICON Capital Corp.
General Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight B L.P.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50310

Summary Calendar

 

RICHARD J. CARTER, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER

OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-95-CV-99

- - - - - - - - - -

January 19, 1998

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Richard J. Carter, Jr., appeals from the district court’s

judgment affirming the denial of his application for disability

insurance benefits. He argues that substantial evidence did not

exist to support the finding that he was not disabled and that

the appropriate legal standards were not applied. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

the judgment is AFFIRMED for essentially the reasons stated by
No. 

-2-

the district court. See Carter v. Chater, No. W-95-CA-099 (W.D.

Tex. February 18, 1997). 

 AFFIRMED; MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DENIED.
```

[Federal Register: May 6, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 87)]
[Notices]               
[Page 24926]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr06my10-35]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date:  Wednesday, May 12, 2010, 9 a.m.-11 a.m.

Place: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

Status:  Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

Matters to be Considered: 
    1. Pending Decisional Matter: Infant Bath Seats--Final Rule:
    A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at http://www.cpsc.gov/webcast/index.html. For a recorded message containing the latest agenda 
information, call (301) 504-7948.

Contact Person for More Information:  Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: May 3, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-10834 Filed 5-4-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAWN SHYHIME JEFFERSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 302 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAWN SHYHIME JEFFERSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 303 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAWN SHYHIME JEFFERSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 304 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 305 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court
[302 WAL 2021, 303 WAL 2021, 304 WAL 2021, 305 WAL 2021, 306 WAL 2021, 307 

WAL 2021 and 308 WAL 2021] - 2

SHAWN SHYHIME JEFFERSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAWN SHYHIME JEFFERSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 306 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAWN SHYHIME JEFFERSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 307 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAWN SHYHIME JEFFERSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 308 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court
[302 WAL 2021, 303 WAL 2021, 304 WAL 2021, 305 WAL 2021, 306 WAL 2021, 307 

WAL 2021 and 308 WAL 2021] - 3

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 129550 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129550 COA: 263521 Jackson CC: 03-004119-FH SHAWN MARIE MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 23, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1219 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2005

Clerk
Aviation captain named DLA’s 3rd quarter Company Grade Officer
 
  By Kimberly K. Fritz, DLA Aviation Public Affairs
   Defense Logistics Agency’s Company Grade Officer of the Quarter for the 3rd quarter fiscal 2017 is DLA Aviation’s own Air Force Capt. Daniel Musleve who is currently assigned to the DLA Aviation, Strategic Acquisitions Programs Directorate where he serves as a logistics career broadening officer.  Air Force Col. John Waggoner, director, Customer Operations Directorate, DLA Aviation nominated  Musleve because he is an exemplary officer in the every aspect of his military duties.
“Whether it is steering one of our many special projects, volunteering in the community, expanding his logistics knowledge, or pursuing Life Cycle Logistics Level I and upgrade qualification as a logistics readiness officer, he embodies the whole person concept,” Waggoner said. 
Musleve has effectively managed more than 389,000 National Item Identification Numbers supporting critical item stock levels across 53 sole-source suppliers and numerous weapons systems.  “Capt. Musleve is dedicated to exceeding the program requirements while providing the best possible support to DLA Aviation’s daily mission,” Waggoner said.
### Lava Falls Rapid in Grand Canyon: Effects of Late Holocene debris flows on the Colorado River

By: Robert H. WebbTheodore S. Melis**Peter G. Griffiths**John G. ElliottThure E. CerlingRobert J. PoredaThomas W. WiseJames E. Pizzuto

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1591

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
SCPW-16-0000655
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

GABI KIM COLLINS, Petitioner,

vs. THE HONORABLE VIRGINIA L. CRANDALL, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent Judge,
and THE ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF KEMOO BY THE LAKE; EKIMOTO AND MORRIS, LLLC; JOHN DOES 1-100; JANE DOES 1-100; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-100; and DOE ASSOCIATIONS 1-100; Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CIV. NO. 13-1-2513-09)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Reck tenwald, C.J., Nak ayama, Mc Kenna, Po llack, an d Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Gabi Kim Collins’s petition for an emergency writ of mandamus, filed on October 5, 2016, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate that she has a clear and indisputable right to the requested relief and that she lacks alternative means to seek relief. Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to an emergency writ of mandamus. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai # i 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-16-0000655 21-OCT-2016 01:48 PMof alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or

obtain the requested action); Honolulu Advertiser, Inc. v. Takao, 59 Haw. 237, 241, 580 P.2d 58, 62 (1978) (a writ of mandamus is not intended to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the trial courts, cure a mere legal error, or serve as a legal remedy in lieu of normal appellate procedure). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, October 21, 2016. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09-12-00493-CR

________________

JUDITH AMANDA COOPER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 10-09517

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant Judith Amanda Cooper

pleaded guilty to aggravated assault. The trial court found the evidence sufficient 

to find Cooper guilty, but deferred further proceedings, placed Cooper on 

community supervision for five years, and assessed a fine of $500. The State 

subsequently filed a motion to revoke Cooper’s unadjudicated community 

supervision. Cooper pleaded “true” to four violations of the conditions of her

community supervision. The trial court found that Cooper violated the conditions 
2

of her community supervision, found Cooper guilty of aggravated assault, and 

assessed punishment at seven years of confinement.

Cooper’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional 

evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 

S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On January 10, 2013, we granted an 

extension of time for appellant to file a pro se brief. We received no response from 

Cooper.

We have reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel’s 

conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it 

unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare 

Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial 

court’s judgment.1

AFFIRMED.

_________________________________

 STEVE McKEITHEN 

 Chief Justice

Submitted on April 30, 2013

Opinion Delivered May 8, 2013

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.

 1

Cooper may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for 

discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Adolor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David
Madden, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                               
|-------------------------------
|/s/ David Madden               
|David Madden                   
|Interim Chief Executive Officer
|July 31, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARTIN
INDUSTRIES, INC. FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          15,157
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,538
<ALLOWANCES>                                       432
<INVENTORY>                                     24,884
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,715
<PP&E>                                          22,904
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,587
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,980
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,543
<BONDS>                                          8,599
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            97
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,526
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,980
<SALES>                                         87,351
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,351
<CGS>                                           67,521
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,521
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,218
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 584
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    828
<INCOME-TAX>                                       576
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                252
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (756)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (504)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.07)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.07)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>THE EARNINGS PER SHARE ("EPS") INFORMATION HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARD NO. 128, EARNINGS PER SHARE. AS
SUCH, BASIC EPS AND DILUTED EPS HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN PLACE OF PRIMARY AND FULLY
DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>


</TABLE>