alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

STATEMENT OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350 

        I,Peter C. Chang, the chief executive officer of Alliance Fiber Optic Products, Inc. (the“Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge, 

    (i)                 the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended          June 30, 2005 (the “Report”), fully complies with the          requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

    (ii)                 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
OFFICE OF
INSPECTOR GENERAL

Chairman and Commissioners
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549

Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs

United States Senate

340 Dirksen Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510

Joseph Lieberman, Chairman

Susan M. Collins, Ranking Member

Committee on Oversight and
Governmental Reform

United States House of Representatives

2157 Rayburn House Office Building

Washington, DC 20515

Darrell E. Issa, Chairman

Elijah Cummings, Ranking Member

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

March 29, 2012

Gene L. Dodaro

Comptrolier General of the United States
U.S. Government Accountability Office
441 G Street, NW

Washington, DC 20548

Jeffrey Zients, Acting Director
Office of Management and Budget
1650 Pennsylvania Avenue

Room 216

Washington, DC 20503

Daniel I. Werfel, Controller

Office of Federal Financial Management
Office of Management and Budget

725 17th Street, NW

Washington, DC 20503

Report of the Inspector General of the Securities and Exchange Commission on Agency
Compliance for Fiscal Year 2011 with the Improper Payments Elimination and

Recovery Act

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Office of Inspector General (OIG)
has completed its required review of the SEC’s compliance with the Improper Payments
Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010 (IPERA) for Fiscal Year 2011 (FY 2011), in
accordance with IPERA and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Memorandum
M-11-16. The SEC OIG examined the SEC’s FY 2011 Performance and Accountability
Report (PAR), which is available on the SEC’s website.

The FY 2011 PAR indicates that the SEC conducted a risk assessment and determined
that none of its programs and activities are susceptible to significant improper payments at or
above the threshold levels set by OMB. Further, the PAR provides that the SEC has
determined that the implementation of a payment recapture program for the SEC (which does
not administer grant, benefit or loan programs) is not cost-effective. In addition, the PAR


Page 2 of 2
March 29, 2012

states that although the SEC has determined that implementation of a payment recapture
program is not cost-effective, it nonetheless strives to recover any overpayments identified
through other sources.

The SEC OIG reviewed the SEC’s IPERA Risk Assessment Summary Report and
supporting documentation to substantiate the SEC’s compliance with IPERA, as well as the
accuracy of improper payment amounts reported in the PAR. Based on our review, we have
determined that the SEC is in compliance with IPERA.

If 1 can provide you with any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me
at (202) 551-6035 or via email at maloneyn@sec.gov.

Sincerely,

CU

Noelle Maloney
Acting Inspector General
Securities and Exchange Commission

Securities and Exchange Commission Compliance for Fiscal Year 2011 with IPERA
No. 00-7228.

#### Hill *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 169 (Friday, August 30, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 53755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21268]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OA-2013-0124]

Good Neighbor Environmental Board; Notification of Public 
Advisory Committee Teleconference

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of public advisory committee teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-
463, notice is hereby given that the Good Neighbor Environmental Board 
(GNEB) will hold a public teleconference on Tuesday, September 24, 
2013. The meeting will take place from 12 p.m. to 4 p.m. Eastern 
Standard Time. The meeting is open to the public. For further 
information regarding the teleconference and background materials, 
please contact Mark Joyce at the number listed below.

DATES: Tuesday, September 24, 2013. The meeting will take place from 12 
p.m. to 4 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Background: GNEB is a federal advisory committee chartered under 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463. GNEB provides 
advice and recommendations to the President and Congress on 
environmental and infrastructure issues along the U.S. border with 
Mexico.
    Purpose of Meeting: The purpose of this teleconference is to 
discuss the Good Neighbor Environmental Board's Sixteenth Report and 
preliminary advice letter. The report and advice letter will focus on 
ecological restoration in the U.S.-Mexico border region.
    General Information: The agenda and meeting materials will be 
available at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OA-
2013-0124. General information about GNEB can be found on its Web site 
at www.epa.gov/ofacmo/gneb.
    If you wish to make oral comments or submit written comments to the 
Board, please contact Mark Joyce at least five days prior to the 
meeting. Written comments should be submitted at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OA-2013-0124.
    Meeting Access: For information on access or services for 
individuals with disabilities, please contact Mark Joyce at (202) 564-
2130 or email at joyce.mark@epa.gov. To request accommodation of a 
disability, please contact Mark Joyce at least 10 days prior to the 
meeting to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request.

    Dated: August 21, 2013.
Mark Joyce,
Acting Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-21268 Filed 8-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
# Commander speaks with county students about DLA careers

/ Published Oct. 25, 2018
Richmond, Va., 
Students from all 10 Chesterfield County, Virginia, high schools gathered together Oct. 22 at Chesterfield Career and Technical Center to hear Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Air Force Commander Brig. Gen. Linda Hurry tell them about DLA Aviation and share information about logistics career fields as well as the Pathways to Career Excellence (PaCE) and Pathways Internship programs currently available.

“I want to share a little about some of the great opportunities that support our national defense that are right next door to you and the great avenues that are available to you,” said Hurry. “The teamwork, how well we take care of each other and leadership opportunities are immeasurable.”

Hurry’s presentation drew approximately 112 attendees from the Business Management and Logistics Operations class; Barbering; Firefighting and Emergency Management Training; Homeland Security, Criminal Justice, Mechatronics; and Academy 360, a middle school alternative program. Hurry shared the mission and vision of DLA and DLA Aviation on behalf of the warfighter, explaining that world-class logistics support is only possible with a plan, the right people and the desire to improve. “DLA supports more than 2,200 weapons systems as the military’s primary source for more than 1.2 million repair parts and operating supply items,” she explained.

Among the teams working toward success at DLA are Industrial Plant Equipment Services and Mapping Customer Operations (MCO). IPES is an industrial plant equipment management facility and maintenance division dedicated to procuring, rebuilding, retrofitting and repairing metalworking machinery for the Department of Defense and other federal agencies. MCO provides a number of different map types to warfighters and other geospatial intelligence customers.

“We are always looking for talent,” she said. 

According to the Virginia Gateway Region, DLA at Defense Supply Center Richmond is the fourth-largest employer, after Fort Lee, Dominion Resources and Amazon. Career fields available include acquisition, logistics and supply chain, quality assurance, engineering, program management, finance, information technology, police/security, firefighting, emergency management, food services and human resources.

DLA hires several summer interns from Virginia higher learning institutions. Interns are trained in a DLA career field such as acquisition, inventory management or quality assurance. These interns can continue to work on a part-time basis with DLA Aviation while they complete their degree. In addition, interns who meet eligibility requirements upon graduation may become full-time employees through the PaCE Program.

Students were invited to attend a field trip to DSCR in November to see first-hand, which jobs match their current training.
Exhibit 24(c)











POWER OF ATTORNEY








KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned director of CULP, INC., a North Carolina corporation, hereby constitutes and appoints KENNETH R. BOWLING the true and lawful agent and attorney-in-fact to sign for the undersigned as a director of the Corporation the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 2, 2010 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and to sign any amendment or amendments to such Annual Report, hereby ratifying and confirming all acts taken by such agent and attorney-in-fact, as herein authorized.








/s/
Kenneth W. McAllisterKenneth W. McAllister











Date:  July 15, 2010
# DLA Aviation Operations Center construction continues

/ Published April 24, 2017
Richmond, Virginia, 
Employees looking at the skyline toward Public Safety Building 201 will notice quite a change from October 2015, when ground was broken for the DLA Aviation Operations Center on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia.

The structure has grown to its promised five stories, and according to an Army Corps of Engineers March progress report, “robust activity continues with almost 150 workers on site daily.” The building exterior is almost finished. The geothermal-well field is complete, and a portion of the parking lot above the field is again usable.

Occupants will benefit from the clean technology and increased efficiency of the well field during winter and summer. The building will also have energy-efficient light sensors using LED lights, touchless water-efficient faucets, low-fill toilets and air-powered hand dryers. The building will include environmentally friendly flooring and ceiling materials. All these features contribute to the building’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Silver rating. LEED ratings were devised by the U.S. Green Building Council to evaluate buildings’ environmental performance and encourage sustainable design.The new operations center will use a fraction of energy of the buildings it replaces. In the past, 70 percent of Defense Supply Center Richmond’s energy was consumed in Buildings 31, 32 and 33, built in World War II as warehouses and later converted to offices. A new video highlights the environmental features of the new building.

According to Alex Vazquez, DLA Installation Support at Richmond engineer and project manager, the project is 52 percent complete, and the contractor plans to turn the building over for occupancy in January 2018.

Workers are still finishing the interior and installing mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection systems.

Renee Gilman, chief of the Resource Management Division in the Command Support Directorate at DLA Aviation, said employee desks, conference room tables, visitor seating and office furnishings have been purchased.  

In mid-May, a display in the DSCR Center Restaurant will let employees see the new employee and supervisor cubicles. Artwork for the operations center will be chosen soon.

Once employees move into the center, Vazquez said, workers will demolish Building 32, Bays A-E, between the spring 2018 and late summer 2018.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 18

- 1213 Filed July 3, 2019

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF KARI TIMMONS AND MATTHEW TIMMONS Upon the Petition of KARI TIMMONS , Petitioner

- Appell ee , And Concerning MATTHEW TIMMONS , Respondent

- Appell ant

.

________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Clarke County, Richard B. Clogg , Judge.

Matthew Timmons appeals the denial of his petition to modify the child

- and spousal

- support provisions of a dissolution

- of

- marriage decree and the award of attorney fees to Kari Timmons

. AFFIRMED AND REMANDED
.

Cathleen J. Siebrecht of Siebrecht Law Firm , Des Moines , for appellant

. Christopher R. Kemp of Kemp & Sease , Des Moines , for appellee.

Considered by Mullins, P.J., Bower, J., and Vogel, S .J. *

* Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206 (2019).2

MULLINS , Presiding Judge
. Matthew Timmons appeals the denial of his petition to modify the child

- and spousal

- support provisions of a dissolution

- of

- marriage decree and the award of attorney fees to Kari Timm o ns

. On our de novo review, we conclude the questions presented are not o f sufficient importance to justify an opinion, an opinion would not have precedential value, and the judgment of the district court is correct. We therefore affirm the district court without opinion. See Iowa R. App. P. 6.1203(a). As the prevailing pa rty, Kari requests an award of appellate attorney fees

. See Iowa Code § 598.36 (2018); Schaffer v. Frank Moyer Constr. Inc. , 628 N.W.2d 11, 23 (Iowa 2001) (holding that a statute allowing an award of trial attorney fees permits an award of appellate attorney fees as well). An award of appellate attorney fees is not a matter of ri ght but rests within this court’ s discretion. In re Marriage of Berning , 745 N.W.2d 90, 94 (Iowa Ct. App. 2007). In determining whether to award attorney fees, we consider the needs of the party making the request, the ability of the other party to pay, and whether the party making the request was obligated to defend the dis trict court’ s decision on appeal. Id

. Kari has not provided an affidavit of attorney fees to support her request and we are therefore unable to determine what amount is reasonable. Nevertheless, considering the relevant facto r s as applied to this case, we find an award of appellate attorney fees to Kari is appropriate

. We accordingly remand the case to the district c ourt to determine the reasonable amount of appellate attorney fees to be paid by Matthew to Kari , not to exceed the $2000 she requested in her brief, and to enter judgment against Matthew and in favor of Kari in that amount. AFFIRMED AND RE MANDED
.
#### Glen H. ELROD, Sr. v. Gladys M. ELROD.

No. 50396.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 31, 1978.

Holmes & Dukes, Alfred B. Jernigan, Jr., Hattiesburg, for appellant.

Mize, Thompson & Blass, W. Joel Blass, Gulfport, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Harrison County; John S. Morris, Chancellor.

Before SMITH, P. J., WALKER and COFER, JJ., and GEORGE F. ADAMS, Commissioner.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive and Acting Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer  of Golden Spirit Enterprises, Ltd.(the "Company"),  hereby certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company  for  the  quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934  and that information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22825]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Division of Research Grants; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Division of Research Grants Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meetings:

    Purpose/Agenda: To review individual grant applicants.
    Name of SEP: Biological and Physiological Sciences.
    Date: August 28, 1997.
    Time: 3:00 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Room 4150, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Marcia Litwack, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4150, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1717.

    Name of SEP: Clinical Sciences.
    Date: August 28, 1997.
    Time: 1:00 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Room 4136, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Gordon Johnson, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4136, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1212.

    Name of SEP: Behavioral and Neurosciences.
    Date: September 3, 1997.
    Time: 1:00 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Room 5178, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Joseph Kimm, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5178, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1249.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
above meetings due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations 
imposed by the grant review and funding cycle.
    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
materials and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 93.333, 
93,337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS.)

    Dated: August 21, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-22825 Filed 8-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**Fertilizer Use and Price Statistics (86012)**
# L_2023174EN.01000101.xml

| 7.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 174/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 174/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/1418

of 30 June 2023

conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the name ‘Pic Saint-Loup’ (PDO)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Pic Saint-Loup’ forwarded by France and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Pic Saint-Loup’ forwarded by France and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Pic Saint-Loup’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Pic Saint-Loup’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Pic Saint-Loup’ (PDO) is hereby protected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 June 2023.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 53, 13.2.2023, p. 22.

2

---