alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22089]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory 
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will 
be open to the public.
    Name of Committee: Circulatory System Devices Panel of the Medical 
Devices Advisory Committee.
    General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and 
recommendations to the agency on FDA regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on September 15, 1997, 9:30 
a.m. to 6 p.m., and September 16, 1997, 8:30 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Location: Gaithersburg Hilton, Salons A, B, and C of the Ballroom, 
620 Perry Pkwy., Gaithersburg, MD.
    Contact Person: John E. Stuhlmuller, Center for Devices and 
Radiological Health (HFZ-450), Food and Drug Administration, 9200 
Corporate Blvd., Rockville, MD 20850, 301-443-8243, ext. 157, or FDA 
Advisory Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in 
the Washington, DC area), code 12625. Please call the Information Line 
for up-to-date information on this meeting.
    Agenda: On September 15, 1997, the committee will hear a 
presentation of the basic concepts of FDA's Product Development 
Process. The committee will discuss and make recommendations on two 
premarket approval (PMA) applications for prosthetic heart valves. On 
September 16, 1997, the committee will discuss and make recommendations 
on a PMA for a prosthetic heart valve.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or 
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee. 
Written submissions may be made to the contact person by September 5, 
1997. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled between 
approximately 9:30 a.m. and 10:30 a.m. on September 15, 1997, and 
between approximately 8:30 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. on September 16, 1997. 
Time allotted for each presentation may be limited. Those desiring to 
make formal oral presentations should notify the contact person before 
September 5, 1997, and submit a brief statement of the general nature 
of the evidence or arguments they wish to present, the names and 
addresses of proposed participants, and an indication of the 
approximate time requested to make their presentation.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: August 14, 1997.
Michael A. Friedman,
Deputy Commissioner for Operations.
[FR Doc. 97-22089 Filed 8-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

November 18, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00505

- CR

Jorge IZQUIERDO

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appel lee

From the 175th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CR10739 Honorable Catherine Torres

- Stahl , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The reporter’s record was originally due October 3, 2022 , but the portion of the reporter’s record that was due from Ms. Herminia Torres was not filed. On October 4, 2022

, C ourt R eporter Herminia Torres filed a notification of late record, requesting an extension until November 7, 2022 to file the record . We granted, in part, Ms. Ms. Herminia Torres’s requested extension and fixed a new deadline of November 2, 2022. On November 8, 2022

, Ms. Herminia Torres filed a second notification of late record, requesting an extension until December 2 , 2022

, to file the record

. After consideration, we GRANT the request and ORDER Ms. Herminia Torres to file the record by December 2, 2022

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3(c) (providing that any extension to file the appellate record in an ordinary or restricted appeal must not exceed thirty days)

. Further requests for extension of time will be disfavored absent extenuating circumstances.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 18th day of November, 2022

.

_________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Bahram Akradi, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Life Time Fitness,Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;     4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting;     5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors andthe audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: August 8, 2005                                     /s/ Bahram Akradi   Bahram Akradi    *Chairman of the Board ofDirectors, President and*
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS109109 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
EXHIBIT 32(a)

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, of Citizens Holding Company
(the Company), as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), I, Greg L. McKee, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 9, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Greg L. McKee                    
|                  |  |  |  | Greg L. McKee                        
|                  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|   | 1. | The annual report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March 12, 2013 | By:    | /s/ Edward Yihua Kang                                |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                            |   | Edward Yihua Kang                                    |   |
|                            |   | Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |   |
#### Robert Oakley HAYES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1381.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 20, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1876

AN ACT

To provide that attorneys employed by the Department of

Justice shall be eligible for compensatory time off for

travel under section 5550b of title 5, United States Code.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 1876 ES

1 SECTION 1. COMPENSATORY TIME OFF FOR TRAVEL.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Attorneys employed by the De3 partment of Justice (including assistant United States at4 torneys) shall be eligible for compensatory time off for

5 travel under section 5550b of title 5, United States Code,

6 without regard to any provision of section 115 of the De7 partments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary,

8 and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2000 (as en9 acted into law by section 1000(a)(1) of Public Law 106–

10 113 and reenacted by section 111 of the Department of

11 Justice Appropriations Act, 2001 (as enacted into law by

12 appendix B of Public Law 106–553)).

13 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall apply with

14 respect to time spent in travel status on or after the date

15 of the enactment of this Act.

Passed the Senate December 6, 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1876

AN ACT

To provide that attorneys employed by the DepartUnited States Code. time off for travel under section 5550b of title 5, ment of Justice shall be eligible for compensatory
Saitta

2 and the petitioner must demonstrate the underlying facts by a preponderance of the evidence, Means v. State, 120 Nev. 1001, 1012, 103 P.3d 25, 33 (2004). We give deference to the district court's factual findings regarding ineffective assistance of counsel but review the court's application of the law to those facts de novo. Lader v. Warden, 121 Nev. 682, 686, 120 P.3d 1164, 1166 (2005).

Appellant argues that counsel was ineffective because she delayed in interviewing the victim until after the victim moved to Oregon, thereby effectively depriving him of any investigation. Appellant failed to demonstrate deficiency or prejudice. Counsel testified at the evidentiary hearing that the defense needed to interview other witnesses before interviewing the victim, that the victim was ultimately interviewed days before trial, and that her version of events had not changed substantially from her testimony before the grand jury. Further, the district court's finding that appellant failed to present any evidence as to what specific information counsel could have obtained had she contacted the victim earlier is supported by substantial evidence in the record. Accordingly, appellant failed to demonstrate a different outcome at trial had counsel attempted to contact the victim earlier. We therefore conclude the district court did not err in denying this claim, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 

### 'OM

Douglas

### 3

- JeA. 

### cc: Hon. Janet J. Berry, District Judge Story Law Group Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A ININEMINV ,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
FINANCIAL  DATA  SCHEDULE  FOR  FISCAL  QUARTER  ENDING  SEPTEMBER  30,2000
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                     105,903
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               61,133
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           167,036
<PP&E>                                     413,753
<DEPRECIATION>                             285,794
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           9,239,790
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      649,659
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                629,418
<COMMON>                                 1,695,344
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             9,239,790
<SALES>                                     51,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            51,636
<CGS>                                          576
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            1,280,748
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,747
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (1,234,166)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                            (1,234,166)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.21)


</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsInvestigation of solid plume simulation criteria to produce flight plume effects on multibody configuration in wind tunnel testsAn investigation to determine the sensitivity of the space shuttle base and forebody aerodynamics to the size and shape of various solid plume simulators was conducted. Families of cones of varying angle and base diameter, at various axial positions behind a Space Shuttle launch vehicle model, were wind tunnel tested. This parametric evaluation yielded base pressure and force coefficient data which indicated that solid plume simulators are an inexpensive, quick method of approximating the effect of engine exhaust plumes on the base and forebody aerodynamics of future, complex multibody launch vehicles.Document ID19860012036Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsFrost, A. L.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Dill, C. C.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1986Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:2569NASA-TP-2569Accession Number86N21507Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860012036.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**Egg Products (PEP-BB)
A product of the National Agricultural Statistics Service, Agricultural Statistics Board, U.S. Department of Agriculture**Description:**
**
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Albert LANDRY.

No. 61551.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 28, 1978.

Robert J. Zibilich, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., William L. Brockman, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Timothy NEMETH, Appellant, v. Mario Luis DE LAUEGA et al., Appellees.

No. 77-703.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 17, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 17, 1978.

Martin M. Dernis, Miami, for appellant.

Talburt, Kubicki & Bradley and Betsy E. Hartley, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff Timothy Nemeth appeals from a final summary judgment in a personal injury tort action entered in favor of the defendants John Duncan, Nancy Duncan and their insurer, State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. The final summary judgment reflects that the trial court in part based its ruling on certain photographic evidence. The transcript of the hearing on the motion for summary judgment further reflects that the trial judge extensively reviewed a series of photographs pertinent to this case and specifically requested that these photographs be included in the record on appeal for our review. The appellant has failed to include these photographs in the record before us.

The law is clear that it is the responsibility and duty of the appellant to provide the appellate court with a record sufficient to review the matter assigned as error. *South Florida Apartment Ass’n, Inc. v. Dansyear,*347 So.2d 710 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *Gleim v. Gleim,*176 So.2d 610 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965) and cases collected. Although we have been critical of the use of photographs as a basis for entering a summary judgment, the law is equally clear that in certain limited cases photographic evidence may form the basis for a summary judgment. See: *Bess v. 17545 Collins Avenue, Inc.,*98 So.2d 490 (Fla.1957); *Pividal v. City of Miami,*105 So.2d 502, 504 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958). For failure of the appellant to include in the record on appeal the essential photographs which form in part the basis for the summary judgment herein, we have no alternative but to affirm the judgment below. *South Florida Apartment Ass’n v. Dansyear,*347 So.2d 710 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *Reicheck v. Florida Bond & Mortgage Co.,*237 So .2d 83 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970); *Belfield v. Lochner,*162 So.2d 668 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964).

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1752 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1752

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the United States Grain Standards Act to reauthorize that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF ACT.

    (a) In General.--Sections 7(j)(4), 7A(l)(3), 7D, 19, and 21(e) of 
the United States Grains Standards Act (7 U.S.C. 79(j)(4), 79a(l)(3), 
79d, 87h, 87j(e)) are amended by striking ``2005'' each place it 
appears and inserting ``2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) take 
effect on September 30, 2005.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Executive and Acting Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer  of Golden Spirit Enterprise, Ltd.(the "Company"),  hereby certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company  for  the  quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934  and that information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 19, 2009

/s/Jaclyn Cruzz

Jaclyn Cruz

Chief Financial Officer
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

January 21, 2009

Before

JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge

KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

No. 07

‐ 3025

ZAFAR HASAN, Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Northern

Plaintiff

‐ Appellant , District of Illinois, Eastern Division.

v. No. 04 C 5690

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP, James B. Zagel

, Judge

.

Defendant

‐ Appellee

.

O R D E R

The Motion for Leave to Intervene and Petition for Rehearing is treated as a

motion by a non

‐ party to correct the opinion.

The motion is granted. The second sentence of Page 13, “Part B,” is amended to

read:

Those facts include Simon’s anti

‐ Muslim comments, Hagerman’s advice,

Mason’s warning to Jaspan about Mr. Hasan’s religion, the suspicious timing of

the downturn in his hours and evaluations following September 11, one partner’sNo. 07-3025 Page 2

testimony that Foley fired no other associates for economic reasons and did well

financially in 2001 and 2002, the Business Law Department’s treatment of its

other Muslim associates and Foley’s shifting justifications for firing Mr. Hasan.

IT IS SO ORDERED.