alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency



### Documentation of OMB Review Under Executive Order 12866
Title of Action:

Docket#: FRL#: RIN: This action was submitted to the Office of Manageme nt and Budget (OMB) for review under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 , titled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Whenever EPA makes publicly available a regulatory action that was reviewed under E.O. 128 66, section 6(a)(3)(E) of the E.O. directs the Agency to also: (1) Make available to the public a copy of the information that was provided to OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) for review under the E.O., i.e. , the text of the draft regulatory action and, if applicable, an assessment of the potential costs and benefits, as well as additional information for those actions that are determined to be economically significant under the E.O. (Information requirements are described in sections 6(a)(3)(B) and (C)). (2) Identify for the public any substantive changes between the draft submitted to OIRA and the action that was subsequently issued, using a method that is complete, clear, and simple. (3) Identify for the public those substantive changes made at the suggestion or recommendation of OIRA. For this regulatory action, were substantive changes made to information reviewed under E.O. 12866? [Please check the appropriate answer.] No. [In the docket, include the information identified in item (1) below.] Yes. [In the docket, include the information identified in items (1) – (3) below.] Accordingly, the Agency has included this form and the following information in the public docket for this regulatory action: [Please check the appropriate information.] (1) A copy of the information that was provided to OIRA for review under the E.O. (2) Documentation of any substantive changes made to the draft regulatory text that was submitted to OIRA when compared with what was subsequently made publicly available. The documentation is provided on the pages following this form. Changes made at the suggestion or recommendation of OIRA, if any, are clearly identified through attribution to OIRA. EPA has used one or more of the following methods to note changes: [Select the appropriate option(s).] (a) Redline-Strikeout – A copy of the draft regulatory action submitted, using redlinestrikeout to show the substantive changes that were made. (b) Hand Markup – A copy of the draft regulatory action submitted, using handwritten notes to show the substantive changes that were made. (c) Note to the file - A document that identifies the substantive changes that were made, with page and paragraph references to the draft regulatory action that was submitted. If you have any questions about this regulatory action or this documentation, please call the contact: Name: Email: Phone:
Revised 05/05/2010 Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: 2012 Renewable Fuel Standards

EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0133 Not available 2060-AQ76

David Korotney korotney.david@epa.gov 734-214-4507
**INCREMENTAL ADJUSTMENTS**

**Annual SO2 Annual NOX**  **OS NOX Annual SO2**  **Florida** 819 **New York** 3,527 3,485 1,911 3,527 **New Jersey** 2,096 420 592

- **Louisiana**

- - 4,231

- **Mississippi**

- - 2,136

- **Texas** 70,067 1,375 1,375 70,067 **Wisconsin** 2,473 7,757 **Nebraska** 3,599 **Michigan** 5,228 **Arkansas Total**  **75,690 16,580**  **11,064 81,351** 

**Annual SO2 Annual NOX**  **OS NOX Annual SO2**  **Florida** 27,825 **New York** 27,325 17,543 8,331 18,585 **New Jersey** 5,574 7,266 3,382 5,574 **Louisiana** 13,432 **Mississippi** 10,160
**Texas** 243,954 133,595 63,043 243,954 **Wisconsin** 79,480 31,628 40,126 **Nebraska** 26,440 **Michigan** 60,193 **Arkansas** 15,037 CSAPR State Budget and NUSA Updates

**2012** Old Budget **2012 Annual NOX**  **OS NOX** SO2 **NOx OS NOx**  **2%** 3,485 1,911 2% 2% 2%

112 195 2% 2% 2%

- 4,231 3%

- 2,136 2% 1,375 1,375 5% 4% 4% 2,473 4% 6% 3,599 6% 5,228 2% 5% **16,272 9,848** 

**Annual NOX OS NOX**  **Annual SO2 Annual NOX** 

**OS NOX Annual SO2**  **Annual NOX OS NOX**  28,644 17,543 8,331 30,852 21,028 10,242 22,112 21,028 10,242 7,266 3,382 7,670 7,686 3,974 5,574 7,378 3,577

13,432

- - 17,663

- - 17,663 10,160

- - 12,296

- - 12,296 133,595 63,043 314,021 134,970 64,418 314,021 134,970 64,418 30,398 79,480 34,101 47,883 32,871 26,440

- 30,039

- - 30,039

- 57,812

- 65,421

- - 63,040

-

15,037

- - 15,037

- - 15,037 CSAPR State Budget and NUSA Updates

**2014 2012**  New Budget
**2014 2014**  NUSA
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 167 (Thursday, August 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23061]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CA-018-1220-02]


Recreation Management; Emergency Closure and Restriction Order, 
California

    Location: The following Emergency Closure and Restriction shall 
apply to Public Lands located adjacent to McCabe Flat Campground, 
specifically the beach swimming area. These Public Lands are located 
within the Folsom Resource Area, Township 4 South, Range 18 East, 
southeast quarter of section 8, Mt. Diablo meridian. This Emergency 
Closure and Restriction Order applies only to the area encompassed by 
sand and normally used for swimming activities in the river. This 
Emergency Closure and Restriction is promulgated pursuant to Title 43 
Code of Federal Regulations, section 8364.1.
    Prohibitions: No person shall:
    1. Possess any bottle or container made of glass.
    2. Enter or be on the beach between sunset and sunrise.
    Period of Time: These closures and restrictions shall be in effect 
from August 22, 1997 to December 31, 1997.
    Exemptions: Federal, state, and local law enforcement officers and 
emergency services personnel, while performing official duties, are 
exempt from these closures and restrictions.
    Reasons for Closure and Restrictions: This area, which is 
immediately adjacent to a public campground, is often used at night by 
persons not registered at the campground. This use is often disruptive 
and annoying to persons using the campground. Campers are intimidated 
and threatened by the night time use on the beach. This closure and 
restriction will protect the public and the resources.
    Violations of this Closure and Restriction Order are punishable by 
a fine not to exceed $1,000 and/or imprisonment not to exceed 12 
months, as specified in Title 43 Code of Federal Regulations, section 
8364.1(d).
D.K. Swickard,
Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-23061 Filed 8-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
Exhibit 3.1
ROSS MILLER
Secretary of State
204 North Carson Street, Ste 1                         Document Number
Carson City, Nevada 89701-4299                         20080350318-20
(775) 684-5708                                         Filed Date and Time
Website: secretaryofstate.biz                          05/22/2008 12:54 PM
                                                       Entity Number C14364-2004

                                                       Filed in the office of
                                                       /s/ Ross Miller
    CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT                           Ross Miller
(PURSUANT TO NRS 78.385 AND 78.390)                    Secretary of State
                                                       State of Nevada

     USE BLACK INK ONLY-DO NOT HIGHLIGHT ABOVE SPACE IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

              CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                         FOR NEVADA PROFIT CORPORATIONS
          (PURSUANT TO NRS 78.385 AND 78.390 - AFTER ISSUANCE OF STOCK)

1.   Name of corporation:

     International Building Technologies Group, Inc.

2.   THE ARTICLES  HAVE BEEN AMENDED AS FOLLOWS  (PROVIDE  ARTICLE  NUMBERS,  IF
     AVAILABLE):

     The par value of the Company's common stock shall be changed to $0.00001

3.   THE  VOTE BY WHICH  THE  STOCKHOLDERS  HOLDING  SHARES  IN THE  CORPORATION
     ENTITLING THEM TO EXERCISE AT LEAST A MAJORITY OF THE VOTING POWER, OR SUCH
     GREATER  PORTION OF THE VOTING  POWER AS MAY BE  REQUIRED  IN THE CASE OF A
     VOTE BY CLASSES OR SERIES,  OR AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE*
     ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION HAVE VOTED IN FAVOR OF THE AMENDMENT IS:

4.   EFFECTIVE DATE OF FILING (OPTIONAL):
     (MUST NOT BE LATER THAN 90 DAYS AFTER THE CERTIFICATE IS FILED)

5.   OFFICER SIGNATURE (REQUIRED):                             /s/ Kenneth Yeung

*    IF ANY  PROPOSED  AMENDMENT  WOULD  ALTER OR CHANGE ANY  PREFERENCE  OR ANY
     RELATIVE OR OTHER RIGHT GIVEN TO ANY CAUSE OR SERIES OF OUTSTANDING SHARES,
     THEN THE AMENDMENT MUST BE APPROVED BY COTE, IN ADDITION TO THE AFFIRMATIVE
     VOTE OTHERWISE REQUIRED OF THE HOLDERS OF SHARES REPRESENTING A MAJORITY OF
     THE  VOTING  POWER  OF EACH  CLASS  OR  SERIES  AFFECTED  BY THE  AMENDMENT
     REGARDLESS OF LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS ON THE VOTING POWER THEREOF.

IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and submit the proper
fees may cause this filing to be rejected.

This form must be accompanied by appropriate fees.
                                  Nevada Secretary of State AM 78 385 Amend 2007
                                                            Revised on. 01/01/07
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Junius WILSON.

No. 62222.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 2, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana, through the District Attorney, Harry F. Connick, applying for writ of certiorari. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.

SANDERS, C. J., would grant the writ.
Exhibit 10.1

 

AGROFRESH SOLUTIONS, INC.

COMPENSATION PLAN FOR INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

 

For service on the Company’s Board of Directors for the period August 1 to December 31, 2015, the compensation payable to the independent members of the board of the directors of the Company (excluding Stephen Trevor, who has agreed to waive his director compensation) shall be as follows:

 

·                  An annual retainer of $60,000, pro-rated based on the number of days’ service on the board since August 1, 2015, divided by 360, and payable quarterly.

 

·                  The chairperson of the board shall receive an additional retainer of $40,000, pro-rated based on the number of days’ service on the board since August 1, 2015, divided by 360, and payable quarterly.

 

·                  Each director shall be reimbursed for customary expenses for attending all board of directors, committee and stockholder meetings.

 

·                  Each independent director (excluding Stephen Trevor) shall receive that number of AGFS shares that, when multiplied by the closing price per share on the trading date immediately preceding the grant date shall be equal to the product resulting from multiplying $75,000 by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days such director has served on the Company’s board since August 1, 2015 and the denominator of which is 360, except that the chairperson shall receive that number of AGFS shares that, when multiplied by the closing price per share on the trading date immediately preceding the grant date shall be equal to the product resulting from multiplying $100,000 by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days such chairperson has served on the Company’s board since August 1, 2015 and the denominator of which is 360.  For purposes of the preceding provisions, the “grant date” shall be December 31, 2015.  In succeeding calendar years, it is intended that the grant date shall coincide with the date of the annual meeting of stockholders.  The foregoing grants shall vest at a rate of 33-1/3% each year, with such vesting to occur on each anniversary of the grant date.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4379-4380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2102]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Minority Veterans, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), in accordance with Public 
Law 103-446, gives notice that a meeting of the Advisory Committee on 
Minority Veterans will be held Thursday, January 30, 1997, in 
Washington, DC. The purpose of the Advisory Committee on Minority 
Veterans is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on the 
administration of VA benefits and services for minority veterans and to 
assess the needs of minority veterans and evaluate whether VA 
compensation, medical and rehabilitation services, outreach, and other 
programs are meeting those needs. The Committee will make 
recommendations to the Secretary regarding such activities.
    The Committee meeting will be conducted via telephone conference 
call. Several members of the Committee will convene in Room 700, VA 
Central Office (VACO) Building, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 
from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. The Committee will review activities and 
accomplishments of subcommittees since the last meeting in November

[[Page 4380]]

1996. The Committee will also finalize plans for subcommittee field 
work and set the agenda for the May 1997 field meeting to be held at a 
site to be determined in the Pacific Northwest region. This session 
will be open to the public. It will be necessary for those wishing to 
attend to contact Mr. Anthony Hawkins, Department of Veterans Affairs, 
phone (202) 273-6708, prior to January 28, 1997. No time will be 
allocated for the purpose of receiving oral presentations from the 
public, however, the Committee will accept appropriate written comments 
from interested parties on issues affecting minority veterans. Such 
comments should be referred to the Committee at the following address: 
Advisory Committee on Minority Veterans, Center for Minority Veterans 
(OOM), U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20420.

    Dated: January 16, 1997.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
Heyward Bannister,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-2102 Filed 1-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6306

CHARLES R. THOMAS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EARL BESHEARS, Warden; EASTERN CORRECTIONAL

INSTITUTION; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-98-324-WMN)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 24, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles R. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Gloria Wilson Shelton, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews,

Severn Eyre Savage Miller, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* For the purposes of this appeal we assume that the date

Appellant wrote on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it

would have been submitted to prison authorities. See Houston v.

Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).

2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Thomas filed an untimely notice of appeal and an untimely motion to extend time to file a notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for

filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These

periods are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director,

Dep’t of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United

States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil

actions have thirty days within which to file in the district court

notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P.

4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the

district court extends the time to appeal upon a party’s timely

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) motion to extend or reopens the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on August 26, 1998;

Thomas’s notice of appeal and motion to extend time to file a

notice of appeal were filed on February 25, 1999. Thomas’s failure

to file a timely notice of appeal* or a timely motion to extend the

time to file a notice of appeal, or to obtain a reopening of the

appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider

the merits of his appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We
3

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly Report of GL Energy and Exploration,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.     the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.


Dated:  August 14, 2003                              /s/ Donald Byers
        ---------------                              ----------------
                                               Name: Donald Byers
                                              Title: Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  August 14, 2003                              /s/ Donald Byers
        ---------------                              ----------------
                                               Name: Donald Byers
                                              Title: Chief Financial Officer
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-11412

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00189-VEH-PWG-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SHERMAINE GERMAN, 

a.k.a. Shade,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

________________________

(November 14, 2014)

Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Alison Wallace, appointed counsel for Shermaine German, in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

Case: 14-11412 Date Filed: 11/14/2014 Page: 1 of 2 
2

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals 

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because 

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, 

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and German’s conviction and 

sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 14-11412 Date Filed: 11/14/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Parraguirre 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

MASEiZE MEE 

at 197, 179 P.3d at 558. It is within our discretion to determine if a writ 

petition will be considered. Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 

674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). Petitioner bears the burden of 

demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth 

Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). This 

court generally will not consider writ petitions challenging district court 

orders denying motions to dismiss unless no factual dispute exists and the 

district court was obligated to dismiss the action pursuant to clear 

authority or an important issue of law needs clarification. Int'l Game 

Tech., 124 Nev. at 197-98, 179 P.3d at 558-59. 

Here, petitioners argue that the district court should have 

dismissed the action based on its inherent powers because a previous case 

had been filed relating to the same underlying incident. According to 

petitioners, however, the previous action was dismissed for procedural 

reasons. Moreover, petitioners have not identified either clear authority 

obligating the district court to dismiss this action or an important issue of 

law that needs clarification. Accordingly, we deny the petition. See NRAP 

21(b)(1); Int'l Game Tech., 124 Nev. at 197-98, 179 P.3d at 558-59. 

It is so ORDERED. 

(0) I947A 
cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge 

Hall Jaffe & Clayton, LLP 

Jones Wilson 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

3
254 La. 5

#### SUCCESSION of Thomas Earl BARR a. k. a. T. E. Barr, Deceased.

No. 49766.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 9, 1969.

In re: Hazel Smyth Barr applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Cad-do. 219 So.2d 817.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in the judgment complained of.