alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135796 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135796 

 COA: 278299 

Oakland CC: 73-015611-FX 

CHARLES WILBUR MEADOWS III,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0421 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2008 

 Clerk
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03597

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 03597\03597_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03597\03597_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 03597\03597_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03597\03597_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03597\03597_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03597\03597_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03597\03597_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03597\03597_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03597\03597_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03597\03597_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

03597\Certification Statement Plant ID 03597.pdf Plant certification statement

x 03597\Supplemental Documents\03597_Follow Up Questions.doc Draft Questions for Follow Up

03597\Supplemental Documents\CBI Substantiation\Duke Energy_EIP FOIA.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03597\Supplemental Documents\D2-3 Pilot Studies\Boron Pilot Study Report_12-2-05.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03597\Supplemental Documents\D2-3 Pilot Studies\Boron Report_9-1-05.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03597\Supplemental Documents\D2-3 Pilot Studies\FGD Constructed Wetland Pilot Studies Report_6-30-05.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03597\Supplemental Documents\D2-3 Pilot Studies\Nutrient Study Final Report_5-15-09.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03597\Supplemental Documents\D2-3 Pilot Studies\Pilot Scrubber Report_12-13-04.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03597\Supplemental Documents\D2-3 Pilot Studies\Vertical Flow Wetland Pilot Study.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03597\Supplemental Documents\D5-10 Engineering Reports\Final Design Report Marshall_5-04.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03597\Supplemental Documents\D5-10 Engineering Reports\Marshall WWSRS Technical Specification.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03597\Supplemental Documents\Diagrams\03597 MARSHALL A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03597\Supplemental Documents\Diagrams\03597 Marshall A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03597\Supplemental Documents\Diagrams\Marshall D3-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03597\Supplemental Documents\Diagrams\Marshall Dry Flyash C2-31.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03597\Supplemental Documents\Diagrams\MARSHALL F5-6.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03597\Supplemental Documents\Diagrams\MARSHALL G3-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
No. 9498.

#### Enderes et al., Exrs. *v.*Marshall.

(Decided February 27, 1906.)

Error, to Superior Court of Cincinnati.

• *Mr. Aaron E. Moore*and *Mr. Frank M. Cottle,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Charles B. Wilby,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23766]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3930-000]


PPM Five LLC; Notice of Filing

September 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 25, 1997, PPM Five LLC tendered for filing 
FERC Rate Schedule No. 1 in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before September 15, 1997. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23766 Filed 9-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1646 

To provide for the care of veterans affected by Hurricane Katrina. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2005 

Mr. AKAKA (for himself, Mr. REID, and Mrs. MURRAY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for the care of veterans affected by Hurricane 

Katrina. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HEALTH CARE AND SERVICES FOR VETERANS 

4 AFFECTED BY HURRICANE KATRINA. 

5 (a) REQUIREMENT FOR HOSPITAL CARE AND MED6 ICAL SERVICES FOR PRIORITY 8 VETERANS AFFECTED BY

7 HURRICANE KATRINA.— 

8 (1) REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of Veterans 

9 Affairs shall furnish hospital care and medical serv10 ices which the Secretary determines to be needed to 

2 

•S 1646 IS

1 each priority 8 veteran affected by Hurricane 

2 Katrina as if such veteran were a veteran described 

3 by section 1710(a)(2) of title 38, United States 

4 Code. 

5 (2) ENHANCED ENROLLMENT PRIORITY.—For 

6 purposes of furnishing hospital care and medical 

7 services under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall 

8 deem each priority 8 veteran affected by Hurricane 

9 Katrina, upon the date of presentation of such vet10 eran to the Department of Veterans Affairs for such 

11 care and services, to have enrolled in the system of 

12 annual patient enrollment of the Department under 

13 section 1705(a) of title 38, United States Code, on 

14 the first day of the current year of such system in 

15 which such date falls. 

16 (b) PROHIBITION ON COLLECTION OF COPAYMENTS

17 FOR VETERANS AFFECTED BY HURRICANE KATRINA.— 

18 In furnishing hospital care and medical services to any 

19 veteran affected by Hurricane Katrina, the Secretary shall 

20 not collect from or with respect to such veteran any pay21 ment for such care and services otherwise required under 

22 any provision of law, including any copayment for medica23 tions otherwise required under section 1722A of title 38, 

24 United States Code. 

25 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

3 

•S 1646 IS

1 (1) The term ‘‘veteran affected by Hurricane 

2 Katrina’’ means any veteran who, as of August 29, 

3 2005, resided in the catchment region of the Depart4 ment of Veterans Affairs medical center in New Or5 leans, Louisiana, Biloxi, Mississippi, or Gulfport, 

6 Mississippi. 

7 (2) The term ‘‘priority 8 veteran affected by 

8 Hurricane Katrina’’ means any veteran affected by 

9 Hurricane Katrina who, as of August 29, 2005, 

10 would have been treated as a veteran covered by 

11 paragraph (8) of section 1705(a) of title 38, United 

12 States Code, for purposes of enrollment in the sys13 tem of annual patient enrollment of the Department 

14 of Veterans Affairs under such section. 

Æ
# CENTCOM helps DoD logisticians and engineers “sustain the fight, set the theater"

/ Published May 15, 2018
AL UDEID AIR BASE, Qatar, *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the U.S. Air Forces Central Command website.*
Sugar and Sweetener Yearbook (89019)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 171 (Thursday, September 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23469]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    Title: Child Care Quarterly Case Record Report.
    OMB No.: New request.
    Description: This legislatively-mandated report collects program 
and participants data on children receiving direct CCDF funds. 
Desegregate data will be collected and will be used to determine the 
participants and program characteristics as well as cost and level of 
child care services. The data will be used to provide a report to 
Congress.
    Respondents: State, Local or Tribal Govt.
    Annual Burden Estimates:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Number of      Average burden                 
                 Instrument                      Number of      responses per      hours per       Total burden 
                                                respondents       respondent        response          hours     
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACF-801.....................................              56                4               20            4,360 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 4,360.
    Additional Information: Copies of the proposed collection may be 
obtained by writing to The Administration for Children and Families, 
Office of Information Services, Division of Information Resource 
Management Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW, Washington, DC 20447, 
Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer.
    OMB Comment: OMB is required to make a decision concerning the 
collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of 
this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best 
assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of 
publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office 
of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, 725 17th Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attn: Ms. Wendy Taylor.

    Dated: August 28, 1997.
Bob Sargis,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-23469 Filed 9-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
### NUMBER 13
- 11
- 00 027
- CV


## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ NUESTRA CLINICA DEL VALLE, INC. , A ppellant ,

v. FUAD ZAYED, M.D. , Appellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 13 9th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Nuestra Clinica Del Valle, Inc. , perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 13 9th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number
C

- 2824

- 07

- C . The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal and request
that this Court dismiss th e appeal

.2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a).

T he joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED

. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring

same. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties = request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered a nd filed the 23rd day of August , 201 1

.
**Exhibit          21.01**

**FNB          Financial Services Corporation**

**Schedule          of Subsidiaries**

| **Name**                                                       | **Jurisdiction                    of Organization** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                                           |                                                |
| FNB                    Southeast (1)                           | North                    Carolina                   |
|                                                           |                                                |
| FNB                    Southeast Investment Services, Inc. (2) | North                    Carolina                   |
|                                                           |                                                |
| FNB                    Southeast Mortgage Corporation (3)      | North                    Carolina                   |
|                                                           |                                                |
| FNB                    Financial Services Capital Trust I (4)  | Delaware                                            |
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. William Belmont GILLESPIE, Appellee.

No. 70-36.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 16, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
# Land and Maritime’s Avenger program a model of interagency cooperation

/ Published April 9, 2018
COLUMBUS, Ohio,
#### Donald C. McKEE, Mildred M. McKee, Don Wussow and Arline P. Wussow, Appellants, v. Jeanne M. GREENE, Appellee.

No. 77-2675.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 5, 1978.

John J. Quinn, Key West, for appellants.

Bradford, Williams, McKay, Kimbrell, Hamann & Jennings and W. Sam Holland, Miami, John E. Bigler, Jr., Key West, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, NATHAN and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal, defendants in the trial court seek review of an adverse final judgment based upon a jury verdict.

 The plaintiff in the trial court was the employee of the appellants. The employers did not provide workmen’s compensation insurance pursuant to Section 440.02, Florida Statutes (1973). Because the employers did not provide such benefits, they were not entitled to the defenses of contributory negligence, assumption of risk, or the fellow servant doctrine in this case. Therefore, they were liable to the plaintiff for any injuries sustained in her employment if they did not provide a safe place for her to work. This issue is one for a jury. See: *Duncan v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company,*193 So.2d 458 (Fla.3d DCA 1966).

Therefore, the final judgment under review be and the same is hereby affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 1 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk February 1 , 2017

15 5103 ( 70 )

SANFORD N. LAKIN and CECILIA L.

LAKIN

, Plaintiff s

- Appell ant s

, SC: 15 5103

v COA: 32 3 695

Oakland CC: 1 4

- 138683

- NO

SR. BARBARA RUND and ST. HUGO OF

THE HILLS CATHOLIC CHURCH,

Defendants

- Appell ee s,

and

MSGR. ANTHONY TOCCO,

Defendant

, _________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of defendants

- appellees to extend the

time for filing their answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED

. The

answer will be accepted as timely filed if sub mitted on or before March 8 , 2017.
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 11/18/2011 10:56 AM Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EGU MACT Rule

Hi all, Consistent with the EOs, attached is the handout from the meeting yesterday.

Regards, Cortney

-----Original Appointment----- From: Echols, Mabel E. When: Thursday, November 17, 2011 3:00 PM-3:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). Where: Room 530 Eisenhower Executive Office Building

Carrie Jenks, M.J. Bradley & Associates, LLC requested this meeting on behalf of the Clean Energy Group.

2060AP52_2011_11_17_MJBradley_Handout.pdf
# New mentorship program aims to InSPIRE

/ Published Dec. 7, 2017
PHILADELPHIA, 
A new road to professional and personal development will open for employees at the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support early next year.  

Joanne Anello, a division chief in the Industrial Hardware supply chain, is developing a mentorship program based on employee feedback in the 2016 DLA Culture Survey and subsequent IH Culture Improvement Team meetings.

Anello has worked in three Troop Support supply chains and volunteered to help groom junior employees in the Pathways to Career Excellence program before she became a supervisor in IH. She’s using her experience to create the program, which is called Industrial Hardware Success and Partnership in Reaching Excellence, or InSPIRE. 

The program is open to all Troop Support employees. 

Anello said that InSPIRE is unique from other programs in that, “we have it broken out into four different levels based on where you are in your career.”

These four levels, or cohorts, consist of employees in the same grade, from intern through new supervisor, who provide mentorship from the next higher grade. For example, a GS-12 employee will mentor a GS-11 employee, and GS-11 employees may mentor GS-9 employees or PaCERS. 

Employees can apply as a mentor or mentee, request specific mentors and participate in community service activities. Mentors and mentees are also encouraged to engage in not only professional, but whole person mentorship, within their comfort zone, Anello said.

InSPIRE is scheduled to start in January 2018. While applications may be submitted at any time, those interested in starting as soon as the program begins should contact Joanne Anello or Chuck Zerambo to submit an application by Dec. 15. 

Anello also recruited the assistance of Industrial Hardware purchasing agent Chuck Zerambo after he approached her at a CIT meeting and told her about his mentor training. 

Zerambo, a certified trainer in areas such as professional relationships and goal setting, is currently involved in Rider University’s Mind Your Business program and Philadelphia’s Young Entrepreneur Academy. 

“His training and mentoring background is a perfect fit,” Anello said about Zerambo. “It’s great to have someone be a part of this program who is as passionate about it as I am.”

John Mumbower, a new supervisor at IH and a chief master sergeant in the New Jersey Air National Guard, said that the program will be “without a doubt, definitely” a good thing.

InSPIRE targets employees at the intern through GS-12 levels, as well as new GS-13s. The program is distinct from DLA Troop Support’s shadow program which targets GS-12 through GS-14 level employees for command level observation and exposure.
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Surfacing, Inc. ("ISI")
on Form 10-QSB/A for the three months ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I, Samuel
Serritella, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, respectfully certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of the section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Samuel Serritella
------------------------
Samuel Serritella
Chief Executive Officer
Docket No. FAA-2015-1987
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1861 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore the phaseout of 

personal exemptions and the overall limitation on itemized deductions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 7 (legislative day, OCTOBER 6), 2005 

Mr. HARKIN (for himself, Mr. KOHL, Mr. LEVIN, and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore 

the phaseout of personal exemptions and the overall limitation on itemized deductions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF PHASEOUT OF PERSONAL 

4 EXEMPTIONS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 151(d) 

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exemp7 tion amount) is amended by striking subparagraphs (E) 

8 and (F). 
2 

•S 1861 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2005. 

4 SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF PHASEOUT OF OVERALL LIMITA5 TION ON ITEMIZED DEDUCTIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 68 of the Internal Rev7 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subsections (f) 

8 and (g). 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

11 December 31, 2005. 

Æ