alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Rule-Making Fact Sheet 

(S MRSA ,¢8057-A) 

AGENCY: Department of Environmental Protection 

NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBER OF AGENCY CONTACT PERSON: 

Andrea Lani 

17 SHS 

Augusta, ME 04353 

207-287-2437 

CHAPTER NUMBER AND RULE TITLE: Chapter 125, Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaner Regulation 

STATUTORY AUTHORITY: 38 MRSA 585A 

DATE AND PLACE OF PUBLIC HEARING : 

March 19, 2009 

Holiday Inn/Ground Round 

Augusta 

COMMENT DEADLINE: March 30, 2009 

PRINCIPAL REASON OR PURPOSE FOR PROPOSING THIS RULE: 

In July 2006, the US EPA amended the National Perchloroethylene Standards for Dry Cleaning Facilities 

(40 CFR Part 63, Subpart M). The Department is amending Chapter 125 to maintain consistency with 

the Federal rule and to request a rule substitution from EPA so that sources do not have to comply with 

two separate regulations . 

ANALYSIS AND EXPECTED OPERATION OF THE RULE: 

The proposed amendments will prohibit the installation of new dry cleaners in a building with a 

residence, or with a day care center, a health care facility, a prison, an elementary school, a middle or 

high school, a children's pre-school, a senior center, a youth center or other facility inhabited by children 

or the elderly ; require that co-located dry cleaners cease operations on December 21, 2020; require all 

drycleaners to inspect equipment weekly with a halogenated hydrocarbon detector; and will limit to 

seven days the amount of time dry cleaning equipment can operate while awaiting repairs . 

FISCAL IMPACT OF THE RULE: This rule is expected to have minimal fiscal impact on the regulated 

community : halogenated hydrocarbon detectors are already required by federal rule so sources should 

have already purchased this equipment. Elimination of co-located dry cleaners after December 21, 2020 

could potentially affect a greater number of sources than the federal rule (which only addresses sources 

co-located with residences) and thus may pose a fiscal impact on those sources that fall within the 

Department's expanded definition of co-located. 

OR RULES WITH FISCAL IMPACT OF $I MILLION OR MORE, ALSO INCL UDE: 

ECONOMIC IMPACT, WHETHER OR NOT QUANTIFIABLE IN MONETARY TERMS : 

INDNIDUALS OR GROUPS AFFECTED AND HOW THEY WILL BE AFFECTED: 

BENEFITS OF THE RULE: 

Note: If necessary, additional pages may be used.
# Navy work boats meet swift end in Yokosuka

/ Published Aug. 17, 2018
Yokosuka, Japan,
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 145 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require the naval forces of the 

Navy to include not less than 12 operational aircraft carriers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25, 2005 

Mr. NELSON of Florida (for himself, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. SESSIONS, and Mr. 

ALLEN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require the naval 

forces of the Navy to include not less than 12 operational 

aircraft carriers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT FOR 12 OPERATIONAL AIR4 CRAFT CARRIERS WITHIN NAVAL FORCES OF 

5 THE NAVY. 

6 Section 5062 of title 10, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as 

9 subsections (c) and (d), respectively; and 
2 

•S 145 IS 

1 (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol2 lowing new subsection (b): 

3 ‘‘(b) The naval combat forces of the Navy shall in4 clude not less than 12 operational aircraft carriers. For 

5 purposes of this subsection, an operational aircraft carrier 

6 includes an aircraft carrier that is temporarily unavailable 

7 for worldwide deployment due to routine or scheduled 

8 maintenance or repair.’’. 

Æ
125 STAT. 232 PUBLIC LAW 112–20—JUNE 24, 2011 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S.J. Res. 9: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 157 (2011): 

Mar. 15, considered and passed Senate. 

June 16, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–20 

112th Congress 

Joint Resolution 

Providing for the reappointment of Robert P. Kogod as a citizen regent of the 

Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), 

the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, 

in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by reason 

of the expiration of the term of Robert P. Kogod of the District 

of Columbia, is filled by reappointment of the incumbent for a 

term of 6 years, effective May 6, 2011. 

Approved June 24, 2011. 

Effective date. 

June 24, 2011 

[S.J. Res. 9] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EDUARDO A. JONSON

,

Appellant,

v.

LONG DUONG and REMY GROUSSON

,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 00169

- CV

Appeal from the

261st Judicial District Court

of Travis County, Texas

(TC# D

- 1

- GN

- 19

- 006950 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee s

recover from Appellant and his sureties, if any, all costs in this Court

. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 43.5.

This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER , 20 21

.

JEFF ALLEY, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox , and Alley , JJ.
U.S
. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration



### SEP 1 72015 Mr. Mike Gillis Bombardier Inc. 200 Cote-Vertu Road West Dorval, Quebec, H4S 2A3 CANADA Dear Mr. Gillis: Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue , S.W
. Renton , Washington 98057-3356

We have received Bombardier's petition letter dated July 2, 2015, requesting exemption from§ 25.813(e), ofTitle 14; Code ofFederal Regulations. This exemption, if granted, would permit the installation ofdoors between passenger seats and emergency exits in BD700-2B12 Global 7000 and BD-700-2B13 Global8000 model airplanes. This request was posted to the Department ofTransportation's Federal Docket Management System (at Regulations .gov) on September 10, 2015, and has been assigned Docket No. FAA-2015-3836. We are currently reviewing your request and will contact you if we need additional information. Ifyou have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please contact Mr. Alan Sinclair by telephone at (425) 227-2195, or by e-mail at Alan. Sinclair@faa. gov.

Deana M . Stedman Transport Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certification Service
Order filed May 9, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

___________

NO. 01-00-00096-CR

____________

ALMAGUER, MIGUEL ANGEL JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 180th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 719896

ORDER
Having issued mandate in this cause on February 28, 2001, this Court orders

the return of all original exhibits to the District Clerk of Harris County for

safekeeping in accordance with their required retention schedule.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to deliver the original of all

exhibits, together with a copy of this Order, to the District Clerk of Harris County,

Texas.

 PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 23

                         Consent of Independent Auditors
<PAGE>




                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Commercial Properties 3, L.P. of our report dated February 5, 1999, included
in the 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders of Commercial Properties 3, L.P. and
Consolidated Ventures.

Our audit also included the financial statement schedule of Commercial
Properties 3, L.P. and Consolidated Ventures listed in Item 14(a). This schedule
is the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement
schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.


                                                /s/ERNST & YOUNG  LLP

New York, New York
February 5, 1999
Exhibit 31.1

              CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Gunther Than, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of View Systems,
Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.



                                  /s/ Gunther Than
Date: May 13, 2005                _____________________________________
                                  Gunther Than, Chief Executive Officer
#### LINSCOMBE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. Henry E. NELSON, d/b/a Nelson Louisiana Developer, et al. JOE’S CONCRETE WORKS, INC. v. Henry E. NELSON et al.

No. 62233.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 2, 1978.

In re: Linscomb Construction Co., Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to *202the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Acadia.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS and DENNIS, JJ., would grant the writ.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 168 (Friday, August 29, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 45774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23015]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Civil Division; Radiation Exposure Compensation Act: Evidentiary 
Requirements; Definitions and Number of Claims Filed

28 CFR Part 79

[A.G. Order No. 2111-97]
RIN 1105-AA49
AGENCY: Civil Division, Department of Justice.

ACTION: Notice of reopening of comment period for proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On May 23, 1997, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) 
published a proposed rule amending the existing regulations 
implementing the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act. This proposed 
rule may be found at 62 FR 28393, May 23, 1997. The original 60 day 
comment period expired on July 22, 1997.
    Several individuals have requested additional time to submit 
comments regarding the proposed changes. To ensure that the public has 
ample opportunity to fully review and comment on the proposed 
amendments, we are now extending the comment period and will accept 
comments for an additional 30 days after publication of this notice.

DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before September 29, 
1997.

ADDRESSES: Please submit written comments to Gerard W. Fischer, 
Assistant Director, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, P.O. 
Box 146, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C. 20044-0146.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gerard W. Fischer (Assistant 
Director), (202) 616-4090 and Lori Beg (Attorney), (202) 616-4377.

    Dated: August 25, 1997.
Janet Reno,
Attorney General.
[FR Doc. 97-23015 Filed 8-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-12-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 163 (Friday, August 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22274]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Docket 21-97]


Proposed Foreign-Trade Zone; Piedmont Triad Area, North Carolina; 
(Guilford, Forsyth, Davidson and Surry Counties, North Carolina); 
Amendment of Application

    Notice is hereby given that the application of the Piedmont Triad 
Partnership, requesting authority to establish a general-purpose 
foreign-trade zone at sites in Guilford, Forsyth, Davidson and Surry 
Counties, North Carolina (Doc. 21-97, 62 FR 15460, 4/1/97), has been 
amended to include two additional parcels within Proposed Site 3 (47 
acres), High Point, North Carolina:

--``Parsons'' parcel (110 acres)--3301-3334 Kivett Drive, High Point
--Kivett Drive Industrial Park parcel (110 acres)--Kivett Drive and 
I-85, High Point (adjacent to the 47-acre parcel initially proposed 
as Site 3)

    As amended, Proposed Site 3 would cover 3 parcels (267 acres) 
within the East High Point I-85/I-74 Industrial Corridor, High Point, 
North Carolina. The application otherwise remains unchanged.
    The comment period is reopened until October 6, 1997. Submissions 
(original and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the Board's Executive 
Secretary at the address below.
    A copy of the application and the amendment and accompanying 
exhibits are available for public inspection at each of the following 
locations:

Office of the Piedmont Triad Partnership, 6518 Airport Parkway, Suite 
100, Greensboro, NC 27409
Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 
3716, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Pennsylvania, Washington, 
DC 20230.

    Dated: August 15, 1997.
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22274 Filed 8-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
**China: Costs of Agricultural Production (90017)**
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical Connections Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

3.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date:May 15, 2009

| |     |                        
| | --- | -----------------------
| | By: | /s/ BRIAN NEILL        
| |     | BRIAN NEILL            
| |     | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries IV, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 2, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries IV, Inc.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**PERIODIC REPORT CERTIFICATION**

**of the Chief Financial Officer**

 

I, Philip F. Otto, certify that: 

 
| 1. |  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Optical Communication Products, Inc.; |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.             The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.             Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.             Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.             All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.             Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

/s/ Philip F. Otto                          

Philip F. Otto

Interim Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

August 11, 2006

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ MATTHEW A. JONESName:
    
    Matthew A. JonesTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer of the
Managing General PartnerDate: August 16, 2010
Exhibit 32.1    Certification Pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350     I, Gunther Than, Chief Executive Officer of View Systems, Inc. (the Corporation), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge that:  1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.   View Systems, Inc.Date: November 5, 2008By:/s/ Gunther ThanGunther ThanPresident, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)
# Hawaii National Guard engineers build shelters for evacuees

/ Published June 11, 2018
PAHOA, Hawai, *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the National Guard website.*
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries VI, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 4, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries VI, Inc.