Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 167 / Thursday, August 28, 1997 / Notices 45649

study it uses to determine the portion of

Account 2124 investment that it

attributes to the billing and collection

category. The special study would then

be subject to the same independent

audit requirements as other regulated

and nonregulated cost allocations. In

addition, to obtain an independent

certification of the validity of the

procedures adopted by the price cap

LEC, we would instruct the independent

auditors to examine the design and

execution of the study during the first

independent audit following the

addition of the billing and collection

section to the CAM and to report their

conclusions on the validity of the study.

We also note, that price cap LECs may

already be required to study the use of

computer investment in Account 2124

as part of the process of allocating that

investment between regulated and

nonregulated activities pursuant to the

Part 64 joint cost rules. (13 respondents

× 700 hours per response = 9100 total

annual hours). b. Tariff Filings: The

FNPRM contains a proposal that may

require the filing of tariffs with the

Commission. The Commission proposes

to permit price cap LECs to assess a

PICC on special access lines to recover

revenues for the common line basket.

The special access PICC would be no

higher than the PICC that an incumbent

LEC could charge of a multi-line

business line. Under our proposal, the

special access PICC would not recover

TIC or marketing expense. Consistent

with our approach to reform the

interstate access charge regime,

however, we tentatively conclude that

the scope of this proceeding should be

limited to incumbent price cap LECs.

(13 respondents × 20 hours per

response=260 hours). Our authority to

collect this information is provided

under 47 U.S.C. §§ 201–205 and 303(r).

The information collected under this

FNPRM would be used by the FCC by

incumbent LECs for use in determining

the proper allocation of general purpose

computer costs to the billing and

collection category. Your response

would be mandatory. Public reporting

burden for the collection of information

is as noted above. Send comments

regarding the burden estimate or any

other aspect of the collections of

information, including suggestions for

reducing the burden to Performance

Evaluation and Records Management,

Washington, D.C. 20554.

Federal Communications Commission.

William F. Caton,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–22850 Filed 8–27–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P

FEDERAL EMERGENCY

MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA–1186–DR]

Colorado; Amendment to Notice of a

Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency

Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice

of a major disaster for the State of

Colorado (FEMA–1186–DR), dated

August 1, 1997, and related

determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 12, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery

Directorate, Federal Emergency

Management Agency, Washington, DC

20472, (202) 646–3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is

hereby given that the incident period for

this disaster is closed effective August

12, 1997.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No.

83.516, Disaster Assistance.)

Lacy E. Suiter,

Executive Associate Director, Response and

Recovery Directorate.

[FR Doc. 97–22944 Filed 8–27–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6718–02–P

FEDERAL EMERGENCY

MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA–1177–DR]

Idaho; Amendment to Notice of a Major

Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency

Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice

of a major disaster for the State of Idaho,

(FEMA–1177-DR), dated June 13, 1997,

and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 11, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery

Directorate, Federal Emergency

Management Agency, Washington, DC

20472, (202) 646–3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice

of a major disaster for the State of Idaho,

is hereby amended to include the

following areas among those areas

determined to have been adversely

affected by the catastrophe declared a

major disaster by the President in his

declaration of June 13, 1997: The county

of Bonneville for Individual Assistance

(already designated for Public

Assistance).

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No.

83.516, Disaster Assistance.)

Dennis H. Kwiatkowski,

Deputy Associate Director, Response and

Recovery Directorate.

[FR Doc. 97–22945 Filed 8–27–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6718–02–P

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS97–1]

Appraisal Subcommittee; Rules of

Operation; Amendment

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee,

Federal Financial Institutions

Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of amended expedited

vote procedures.

SUMMARY: The Appraisal Subcommittee

(‘‘ASC’’) of the Federal Financial

Institutions Examination Council is

amending Section 3.13 of its Rules of

Operation, which governs the

transaction of business by circulation of

written items, i.e., by notation vote. As

amended, the Section will allow each

ASC member to vote in one of three

ways: to approve, to disapprove or to

veto. A vote to veto will require the

issue to be placed on the agenda for the

next scheduled ASC meeting. If a veto

is not exercised, a majority will decide

the matter, provided a quorum of ASC

members participates in the voting

process. In general, the Section

previously required unanimous

approval by all ASC members. A single

member’s ‘‘no’’ vote or failure to vote

within a reasonable time operated as a

veto.

EFFECTIVE DATE: Immediately.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ben Henson, Executive Director, or

Marc L. Weinberg, General Counsel, at

(202) 634–6520, via Internet e-mail at

benh1@asc.gov and marcw1@asc.gov,

respectively, or by U.S. Mail at

Appraisal Subcommittee, 2100

Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 200,

Washington, D.C. 20037.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The ASC,

on May 29, 1991, adopted Rules of

Operation, which were published at 56

FR 28561 (June 21, 1991). The Rules of

Operation describe, among other things,

the organization of ASC meetings,

notice requirements for meetings,

quorum requirements and certain

practices regarding the disclosure of

information. The ASC, at its August 13,

1997 meeting, approved a total,

substantive revision of Section 3.13 of

the Rules of Operation, which deals

with notation voting.