alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Fred SAUCIER v. HAYES DAIRY PRODUCTS, INC. and the Hartford Group Insurance Company.

No. 61562.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 24, 1978.

In re: Fred Saucier, applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of St. Bernard. 353 So.2d 732.

Granted.

It is ordered that' the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### AMERICAN HARDWARE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Appellant, v. MIAMI LEASING AND RENTALS, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 77-1911.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 11, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 29, 1978.

John A. Murray, Miami, for appellant.

Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Davant, McMath, Tutan & O’Hara and Richard A. Sherman, Miami, for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant insurer appeals a final judgment on the pleadings awarding plaintiff insured $1,160.90 plus costs and attorney’s fees in an action seeking damages for the defendant’s breach of its duty to defend plaintiff.

Plaintiff, Miami Leasing and Rentals, Inc., was insured against all personal injuries arising from, inter alia, malicious prosecution under an insurance policy issued by the defendant-appellant, American Hardware Mutual Insurance Company. Miami Leasing was sued for malicious prosecution and the complainant sought both compensatory and punitive damages. American Hardware advised Miami Leasing that it would not defend on the punitive damages claim and Miami Leasing had to retain counsel to defend it on this claim. As a result Miami Leasing incurred costs and attorney’s fees in the sum of $1,160.90 and then filed the instant suit for recovery on the ground that American Hardware was obligated to defend its interests as to the punitive damages claim as well as the compensatory damages claim. American Hardware answered alleging that the subject policy did not protect Miami Leasing against a claim for punitive damages as asserted in the malicious prosecution lawsuit. Both parties filed motions for judgment on the pleadings and after hearing argument of counsel and reviewing written memoranda of law in support of the respective motions, the trial court entered final judgment for Miami Leasing. American Hardware appeals. We affirm.

We agree with Miami Leasing that American Hardware has misconceived the issue as being one of coverage. The dispositive issue is whether American Hardware was under a duty to defend. The well established law is that where the complaint against the insured contains allegations which are partially within and partially *29without the scope of the insured’s coverage, then the insurer must defend even those portions of the complaint which are outside the coverage. See *Travelers Indemnity Company*v. *Thomas,*315 So.2d 111 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); *Employers Commercial U. Ins. Co. of Am. v. Kottmeier,*323 So.2d 605 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); *Stevens v. Horne,*325 So.2d 459 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2 EXHIBIT TOJUNE
30, 2014, FORM 10-Q/A OF PCS EDVENTURES!.COM, INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of PCS Edventures!.com, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2014, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), I, Russelee Horsburgh, Vice
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Quarterly
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|Date: | March 20, 2015 |  | By: | /s/Russelee Horsburgh
|----- | -------------- |  | --- | ---------------------
|      |                |  |     | Vice President       





A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

February 27, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 132484 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 132484 

 COA: 264337 
 Ottawa CC: 01-040310-CC 

ROOKS FAMILY TRUST, J.F. GIRARD 

ROOKS, and JEANNE A. ROOKS, 

Co-Trustees, 

Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

UNION BANK & TRUST CO., N.A., and

PATER BROTHERS FARMS, a/k/a 

JOHN PATER,

Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 5, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0220 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 27, 2007 

 Clerk
#### Charles JONES v. BENTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION.

No. 49979.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 15, 1978.

Johnston & Adams, Lem Adams, III, Brandon, for appellant.

Farese, Farese & Farese, John B. Farese, Ashland, for appellee.

Before INZER, P. J., and SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

Reversed and remanded.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and ROBERTSON, BROOM, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Florida and State of Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, Appellants, v. Bernard BROWNSTEIN, Appellee.

No. 76-2327.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 22, 1977.

Edwin E. Strickland and Enoch J. Whitney, Tallahassee, for appellants.

Mark R. Baer, Miami, for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, NATHAN and HUBBART, JJ.

*145PER CURIAM.

Respondent, State of Florida, Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, appeals a circuit court order granting certiorari, thereby temporarily reinstating Bernard Brownstein’s driving privileges, which had been suspended.

The sole question is whether the circuit court erred in granting the writ of certiora-ri in the absence of the record showing that the Department acted without jurisdiction or failed to follow the essential requirements of law when it revoked Brownstein’s driving privileges and denied reinstatement of such privileges. We reverse.

In May, 1972, Brownstein’s driving privileges were suspended by the Department as authorized by Section 322.27, Florida Statutes. Shortly thereafter, he filed a petition for certiorari in the circuit court seeking review of his suspension. In 1974, his petition was dismissed by the circuit court pursuant to Rule 1.420(e), Fla.R.Civ.P., for lack of prosecution.

Between 1972 and 1974, Brownstein continued his bad driving habits and accumulated additional driving convictions while driving his car during the revocation period. The Department entered an order in September, 1974, revoking Brownstein’s driving privileges for a period of five (5) years as an habitual offender, as authorized under Section 322.27(5), supra. Brownstein then requested and received an administrative hearing from the Department seeking reinstatement of his driving privileges. In July, 1976, after hearing, his petition was denied. Brownstein then filed his petition for certiorari, the order on which is here on review.

Brownstein’s petition for certiorari in the circuit court alleges that Sections 322.264, 322.27(5) and (6), and 322.271, Florida Statutes, known as the Florida habitual traffic offender act, are unconstitutional. The circuit court in its order granting certiorari, did not pass on the constitutionality of these statutes, but simply granted temporary driving privileges for working purposes for ten (10) hours per day, seven (7) days per week.

The habitual traffic offender act was held to be constitutional in *Zarsky v. State,*300 So.2d 261 (Fla.1974); *Abraham v. State,*301 So.2d 11 (Fla.1974).

Viewing the entire record, we conclude that the Department did not act without jurisdiction or depart from essential requirements of law.

Reversed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


                  We have issued our report dated February 21, 2003 accompanying
the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Image
Sensing Systems, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2002. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of Image Sensing Systems, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No.
333-82546, effective February 11, 2002; File No. 333-86169, effective August 30,
1999; and File No. 333-09289, effective July 31, 1996) and on Form S-3 (File No.
333-41706, effective July 19, 2000).


                                                        /s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 24, 2003
#### William S. MADDOX v. SOUTHERN CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. et al.

No. 60534.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 27, 1977.

In re: Southern Casualty Insurance Co. applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of LaSalle. 348 So.2d 685.

Writ denied.
**Sheep (PGG-BB)
A product of the National Agricultural Statistics Service, Agricultural Statistics Board, U.S. Department of Agriculture**Description:**This full-text file presents the sheep and lamb inventoryby class for selected states or regions and U.S. Data includesexpected lamb crop, market sheep and lambs inventory byweight group, number returned to breeding herd. This reportis a supplement to Sheep and goats.

See also: Sheep and Goats-Final Estimates 1994-98
- Sheep, 07.16.99 [ Text |   PDF ]  Sheep, 07.17.98 [ Text ]Sheep, 11.14.97 
[ Text ]
- Sheep, 07.18.97  [ Text ]  Sheep, 04.18.97 [ Text ]Sheep, 11.15.96 
[ Text ]
- Sheep, 07.19.96  [ Text ]  Sheep, 04.19.96 [ Text ]Sheep, 11.17.95 
[ Text ]
- Sheep, 07.21.95  [ Text ]  Sheep, 04.21.95[ Text ]

**
**Vegetables--Final Estimates (95902)**
No. 47103.

#### Protest 961368-G of Atlas Marine Supply Co. (Los Angeles).

*501Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of cylindrical and tubular tanks or vessels and that they are the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Atlas Marine Supply Co.*v. *United States*(29 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 165). In accordance therewith the drums in question were held entitled to free entry under section 309(a), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 5(a), Customs Administrative Act of 1938, as claimed.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned officer of Crystal Finance
Holding Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 of the Company
fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: November 14, 2006 /s/ Michel Poignant
President and Director and
Chief Financial Officer
Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 10.15





Written Description of Non-employee Director Compensation








Each non-employee Director will be paid an annual retainer of $40,000 (except the Lead Director, who will receive a $45,000 retainer), plus an annual grant of options to purchase 2,000 shares of the Company’s stock.  The options are to be granted under the Company’s 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, which provides for options to be granted to directors with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant.  The options will be immediately exercisable upon grant and remain outstanding for a period of 10 years from the date of grant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                          $   893,494
<SECURITIES>                         25,000
<RECEIVABLES>                       849,482
<ALLOWANCES>                         26,744
<INVENTORY>                         102,805
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  1,449,301
<PP&E>                            1,693,872
<DEPRECIATION>                      654,255
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    3,332,539
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               578,134
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                             25,832
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                        2,512,803
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      3,332,539
<SALES>                           1,408,054
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  3,218,115
<CGS>                             1,115,262
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     1,899,484
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   28,235
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     117,357
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 117,357
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        117,357
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          .005
<EPS-DILUTED>                          .005
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23a**

** **

** **

**Consent of Independent Auditors**

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statement Nos. 33-6300, 33-19372, 33-38928, 33-38925,33-86726, 333-14607, 333-29949, 333-85988, and 333-99233 of MFIC Corporation(the Company) on Form S-8 of our report dated March 11, 2004, except for Note15, as to which the date is March 31, 2004, pertaining to the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule of MFIC Corporation included in the AnnualReport (Form 10K) for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.

 
|                  | /s/ Brown & Brown, LLP |   |
|-----------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|                  | Brown & Brown, LLP     |
|                  |
| Boston, Massachusetts |
| April 5, 2004         |

 

----
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1792 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

205 West Washington Street in Knox, Indiana, as the ‘‘Grant W. Green 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2005 

Mr. LUGAR (for himself and Mr. BAYH) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 205 West Washington Street in Knox, Indiana, as the ‘‘Grant W. Green Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GRANT W. GREEN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 205 West Washington Street in 

6 Knox, Indiana, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Grant W. Green Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
2 

•S 1792 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Grant W. Green Post 

3 Office Building’’. 

Æ
Exhibit32.1

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,ASADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VillageEDOCS, Inc. (the "Company") onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that::

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

| Date:  May 24, 2010                                                         | /s/ K. Mason Conner                  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|           ------------------------- | ------------------------------------ |
|                                                                                  | Chief Executive Officer              |

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BYSECTION 906, OR OTHER DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISEADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSIONOF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TOVILLAGEEDOCS AND WILL BE RETAINED BY VILLAGEEDOCS AND FURNISHED TO THESECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
| • | the      quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended      December31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| • | the      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      February 14, 2011  |   | /s/      Michael      Grendi     |
|------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                               |   | Michael      Grendi              |
|                               |   | Principal      Financial Officer |

----
PUBLIC LAW 110–454—DEC. 19, 2008 122 STAT. 5035 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6859: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Sept. 27, considered and passed House. 

Nov. 20, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–454 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1501 South 

Slappey Boulevard in Albany, Georgia, as the ‘‘Dr. Walter Carl Gordon, Jr. Post 

Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DR. WALTER CARL GORDON, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 1501 South Slappey Boulevard in Albany, 

Georgia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Dr. Walter Carl 

Gordon, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Dr. Walter Carl Gordon, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Approved December 19, 2008. 

Dec. 19, 2008 

[H.R. 6859] 


kgrant on POHRRP4G1 with PUBLAW
MIRANDA GOLD CORP.

Unit 1  15782 Marine Drive

White Rock, B.C. V4B 1E6



Tel:  (604) 536-2711

Fax: (604) 536-2788





Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Miranda Gold Corp. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Doris Meyer, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of her knowledge, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:

February 16, 2007





signed Doris Meyer

______________________________________________

Doris Meyer, Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                5
<CIK>                                           0000722617
<NAME>                                     MNI GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1
<CURRENCY>                                             USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                             649,700
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       14,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         83,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   770,100
<PP&E>                                             100,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                      91,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     795,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,808,400
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         7,313,900
<OTHER-SE>                                      (8,327,200)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       795,100
<SALES>                                            443,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   443,200
<CGS>                                              267,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,086,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  94,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (244,200)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (729,300)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    485,000
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (244,200)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


</TABLE>