alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mercer SCOTT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-337.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 9, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Warren S. Schwartz, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and HEN-DRY and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Mercer Scott, appeals a sentence of fifteen years in the state penitentiary following an order revoking his probation.

Defendant was informed against as follows:

> Count I — sale of cocaine on November 1, 1974;

> Count II — possession of cocaine on November 1, 1974;

> Count III — sale of heroin on November 1, 1974;

> Count IY — possession of heroin on November 1, 1974;

> Count V — sale of cocaine on November 4, 1974;

> Count VI — possession of cocaine on November 4, 1974.

*267He pled guilty and received a sentence of one year in the county jail on Count I and five years probation on each of the remaining Counts. Subsequently, an affidavit of violation of probation was filed and after hearing, defendant’s probation was revoked and he received a sentence of fifteen years imprisonment on Counts II-VI. This appeal from the sentence ensued.

Defendant first argues that the sentence, imposed with respect to Counts III— VI is illegal because the heroin and cocaine he possessed on November 1 and 4, 1976, respectively, were the same heroin and cocaine he sold on those dates; Counts III and IV and V and VI being a facet or phase of a single transaction, only one sentence as to each of the two combined counts could have been imposed. *Yost*v. *State,*243 So.2d 469 (Fla.3d DCA 1971). *Orange v. State, 334*So.2d 277 (Fla.3d DCA 1976).

A review of the record reveals that defendant has not included a transcript of the hearing where testimony was presented to prove the subject offenses of sale and possession. The record having failed to substantiate that a single transaction was involved, no error has been made to appear. See *Brown v. State,*110 So.2d 94 (Fla.3d DCA 1959); *Suiero v. State,*248 So.2d 219 (Fla.4th DCA 1971). Further, assuming ar-guendo that the record substantiated defendant’s claim of a single transaction, then sentence should have been imposed only for the higher offense; in this case, sale of the cocaine and heroin. Nevertheless, defendant received the same probationary term on all counts and the probation sentences on Counts III and V (as well as Count II) were valid. Thus, the order revoking probation was proper.

Defendant also argues that the sentence to fifteen years is invalid because it is a general sentence.

Since general sentences are no longer proper and may not be imposed by the trial court, we hereby vacate the sentence and remand the cause to the trial court for resentencing. See *Dorfman*v. *State,*351 So.2d 954 (Fla.1977).

So ordered.
June 25 ,	2015

U.	S.	Department	of	Transportation Docket	Management	System 1200	New	Jersey	Ave.,	SE Washington	DC	20590 Re: Amendment	to	Exemption Application	No. FAA- 2015 - 0228 filed pursuant	to	Section	333	of	the	FAA	Reform	Act	and	Part	11	of	the Federal	Aviation	Regulations	in	Regulatory	Docket	No. FAA- 2015 - 0228 . Dear	Sir	or	Madam; High	Flight	Photo has been	granted	an	exemption, Exemption	No.	11455 , (hereinafter	the	Exemption) for	the	purpose	of aerial	imaging with	sUAS . High Flight	Photo hereby	requests	an	amendment	to	the	Exemption	to	allow an additional model of	unmanned	aircraft systems	(UAS)	that	fully	complies with	the	conditions	of the	Exemption. High	Flight	Photo wishes	to	operate the	Kespry	UAS under	the	same	terms and	conditions	contained	in	the	Exemption.		Attached	hereto,	and	submitted	as	a confidential	document,	is	the	Flight	Operations	and	Procedures	Manual	for	the Kespry UAS.	All	operations	of	the	additional	UA S	will	be	in	full	compliance	with	the terms	of	the	Exemption. Please	contact	the	undersigned	should	you	have	any	questions	concerning this	request	for	an	amendment	to	the	Exemption. Sincerely	yours,

Mike	Porter High	Flight	Photo

Gabriel	Dobbs Kespry,	Inc.
Exhibit32.2

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,ASADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofVillageEDOCS (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months endedJune 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Quarterly Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

| Date:  August 16, 2006                                                      | /s/ Michael A. Richard              |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|           ------------------------- | ----------------------------------- |
|                                                                                  | Chief Financial Officer             |

*ASIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHERDOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURETHAT APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTENSTATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO VILLAGEEDOCS AND WILLBE RETAINED BY VILLAGEEDOCS AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.*
# Jfourtlj**Court of** **Antonio, October** **30. 2013** **No. 04-13-00242-CR** 

### No.**G4-13-00243-CR James** **Michael Chin.** 

### Appellant**V. The** **Slate of** **Texas, Appellee** 

### Trial**Court Case** **No. 2012CR5328** **and 201ICR7140** 

## ORDER**The Court** **has reviewed** **the record** **and briefs** **in these** **appeals and** **has determined** **that**

### oral**argument will** **not significantly** **aid it** **in determining** **the legal** **and factual** **issues presented** **in the** **appeals. See** **Tex. R.** **App. P.** **39.X. Therefore,** **all requests** **for oral** **argument are** **denied, and** 

### the**causes are** **advanced for** **ON BRIEFS** **submission on** **December 4.** **2013. to** **the following** **panel: Chief** **Justice Stone.** **Justice Barnard,** **and Justice** **Alvarez. All** **parlies will** **he notified** **o\' the** **Court's decision** **in these** **appeals in** **accordance with** **TEX. R.** **App. P.** **48. Either** **parly may** **file motion** **requesting [he** **Court lo** **reconsider ils** **determination that** **oral argument** **will not** **signineanily aid** **the Court** **in determining** **the legal** **and factual** **issues**

### presented**in the** **appeals. See** **TEX. R.** **App. P.** **39.8. Such** **motion should** **be filed** **within ten** **(10) days from** **the date** **of [his** **order.**

### It**is so** **ORDERED on** **October 30.** **2013. IN** **WITNESS WHEREOF** **court on** **this October** **30. 2013.** **Qalhewnc Stone.** **Chief Justice** 

# have**hereunto set** **my hand** **and a/fixed** **the seal** **o/the**

# /_
#### Raymond MILLER v. MERRIL J. BUSTER BROWN AND CONTINENTAL INS. CO.

No. 60283.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 30, 1977.

In re: Raymond Miller applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St. Mary, 346 So.2d 731.

Application denied.
# L_2023071EN.01004301.xml

| 9.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 71/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 71/43

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/466 of 3 March 2023 amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for isoxaben, novaluron and tetraconazole in or on certain products

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 68 of 6 March 2023
  )

On page 78, in the Annex, point (3), in the header of column (3) of the table:

for:

‘(sum of constituent isomers) (F)’,

read:

‘Novaluron (sum of constituent isomers) (F)’.

---
#### Edgar Linwood ELLIS v. Veronica A. CANGEMI.

No. 50556.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 16, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 20, 1978.

C. R. McRae, Pascagoula, for appellant.

J. Elmo Lang, Pascagoula, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; Merle F. Palmer, Judge.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and SUGG and COFER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Joseph Lampariello, ChiefOperating Officer and Treasurer of Medical Capital Management, Inc., certifythat:

 

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofMedical Capital Management, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrantand we have:

 

a)             designed such disclosure controls and procedures toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

 

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior tothe filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)             presented in this quarterly report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a)             all significant deficiencies in the design or operationof internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified forthe registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)            any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls; and

 

6.             The registrant’s other certifying officers and I haveindicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significantchanges in internal controls or in other factors that could significantlyaffect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.

 
| Date:  March 29, 2004 |
|----------------------------|
|                       |
| /s/ Joseph  Lampariello    |   |
| Joseph  Lampariello        |
| Chief  Operating Officer   |

 

----
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-QSB/A
Ozolutions Inc.
File No. 000-31343

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ozolutions Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 29, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Max
Weissengruber, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 24, 2004                        By:  /s/ Max Weissengruber
                                             --------------------------------
                                             Chief Executive Officer


          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ozolutions Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 29, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
Robertson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 24, 2004                        By:  /s/ Douglas Robertson
                                             --------------------------------
                                             Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Ozolutions Inc. and will be retained by Ozolutions Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

Calendar No. 314 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1578 

[Report No. 109–196] 

To reauthorize the Upper Colorado and San Juan River Basin endangered 

fish recovery implementation programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 29, 2005 

Mr. ALLARD (for himself, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. HATCH, Mr. SALAZAR, and Mr. 

BINGAMAN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

DECEMBER 8, 2005 

Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of November 18, 2005, 

by Mr. DOMENICI, without amendment 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Upper Colorado and San Juan River 

Basin endangered fish recovery implementation programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 1578 RS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Upper Colorado and 

3 San Juan River Basin Endangered Fish Recovery Pro4 grams Reauthorization Act of 2005’’. 

5 SEC. 2. UPPER COLORADO AND SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN EN6 DANGERED FISH RECOVERY IMPLEMENTA7 TION PROGRAMS. 

8 Section 3 of Public Law 106–392 (114 Stat. 1602; 

9 116 Stat. 3113) is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (a)— 

11 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking 

12 ‘‘$46,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$61,000,000’’; 

13 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘2008’’ 

14 and inserting ‘‘2010’’; and 

15 (C) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘2008’’ 

16 and inserting ‘‘2010’’; 

17 (2) in subsection (b)— 

18 (A) by striking ‘‘$100,000,000’’ and in19 serting ‘‘$126,000,000’’; 

20 (B) in paragraph (1)— 

21 (i) by striking $82,000,000’’ and in22 serting ‘‘$108,000,000’’; and 

23 (ii) by striking ‘‘2008’’ and inserting 

24 ‘‘2010’’; and 

25 (C) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘2008’’ 

26 and inserting ‘‘2010’’; and 
3 

•S 1578 RS

1 (3) in subsection (c)(4)— 

2 (A) in the first sentence, by inserting ‘‘and 

3 the Elkhead Reservoir enlargement’’ after 

4 ‘‘Wolford Mountain Reservoir’’; and 

5 (B) in the second sentence, by striking 

6 ‘‘$20,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$31,000,000’’. 
Calendar No. 314 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1578 

[Report No. 109–196] 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Upper Colorado and San Juan 

tation programs. River Basin endangered fish recovery implemenDECEMBER 8, 2005 

Reported without amendment
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.02


THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE
STATE AUTO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
LEADERSHIP BONUS PLAN


Background Information
		
	A.
	State Auto Financial Corporation (“STFC”) previously adopted and maintains the State Auto Financial Corporation Leadership Bonus Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of identified executive officers and other key management employees, managers and professionals.


		
	B.
	STFC desires to amend the Plan to include additional forfeiture events for awards made under the Plan.


		
	C.
	Article 9 of the Plan permits the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of STFC to amend the Plan.




Amendment of the Plan
The Plan is hereby amended effective January 1, 2015 as follows:
		
	1.
	Section 6.4 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding a new third sentence to read as follows:


Further, the Administrator may, in its discretion, require that all or any portion of a Final Bonus paid to a Participant for the current or immediately preceding Performance Period be forfeited and returned to the Company if the Participant directly or indirectly solicits or causes to be solicited, or in any other way is responsible for, an offer of employment to be made to any employee of the Company for twelve months after such Participant’s termination of employment from the Company, without the prior written consent of the Company.
		
	2.
	All other provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


	
	
	STATE AUTO FINANCIAL CORPORATION

	 

	BY: Jay Yano

	TITLE: Senior Vice President

	DATE: March 5, 2015
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21229]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Minnesota Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Minnesota Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 1:00 
p.m. and adjourn at 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, September 25, 1997 at the 
Embassy Suites, 425 S. 7th Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415. The 
purpose of the meeting is to discuss civil rights issues of interest 
and plan future activities.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Alan W. 
Weinblatt, 612-292-8770, or Constance M. Davis, Director of the 
Midwestern Regional Office, 312-353-8311 (TDD 312-353-8362). Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least five (5) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, August 5, 1997.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-21229 Filed 8-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Bellows Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2005 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  August 8, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                 SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Central Jersey Bancorp (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,  2007,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, James S. Vaccaro, Chairman
and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  do hereby certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of ss.13(a) or 15(d) of
         the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  15 U.S.C.  ss.78m or
         78o(d), and,

(2)      the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




Dated: August 9, 2007                        /s/ James S. Vaccaro
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          James S. Vaccaro
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer