alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 99-6511.

#### Lages *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
# Cmdr. Thomas R. Marszalek retires from DLA Maritime Pearl Harbor

/ Published Aug. 29, 2017
PEARL HARBOR, Hawaii, 
Cmdr. Thomas R. Marszalek, Director, DLA Maritime Pearl Harbor, retired onboard the Battleship USS Missouri on Aug. 23, 2017, after serving 28 years of faithful and honorable service in the U.S. Navy Capt. Timothy L. Daniels, Commander, DLA Pacific, officiated the retirement ceremony attended by honored guests, friends, family and shipmates.

Daniels presented Marszalek with a flag that was flown over the USS Arizona memorial. 

Marszalek is a native of Oak Lawn, Ill. He graduated from St. Norbert College, DePere, Wis. in 1987 with a Bachelor’s Degree in Accounting.  He worked as an accountant for two years before being accepted to Officer Candidate School in June of 1989. He was commissioned in October of 1989 and attended Navy Supply Corps School. 

Over the course of 28 years in service, Marszalek earned the Surface Supply and Submarine Supply Warfare pins, qualified as a Joint Specialty Officer, and became a member of the Defense Acquisition Corps. He’s been awarded the Defense Meritorious Service Medal (2 awards), Meritorious Service Medal (2 awards), Navy Commendation Medal (4 awards), Navy Achievement Medal (3 awards) and various campaign and service medals. 

Marszalek and his wife, Cely, were married in June of 1994 and the couple has a son, Christopher, who’s now a senior at the University of Portland in Oregon. 

Fair winds and following seas to Marszalek as he heads for a new adventure in retired life.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

					NO. 2-04-372-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

		V.

KELLY RUSSELL CASTONGUAY  						  APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 3 OF DENTON COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered the “State’s Motion To Dismiss Appeal And Issue Mandate.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).  As agreed by the parties, the mandate will issue immediately.  See Tex. R. App. P. 18.1(c).	

	It is further ordered that the State shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.01(f) (Vernon Supp. 2004-05).

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.  

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: November 24, 2004
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Alfred JUDSON v. Hayden DEES, Warden.

No. 61537.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 24, 1978.

In re: Alfred Judson applying for writ of certiorari. Iberville Parish.

Writ denied.
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the quarterly report of Ghost Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gianfranco Gracchi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2.
The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Gianfranco GracchiGianfranco Gracchi

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)


Dated: June 14, 2011

















In connection with the quarterly report of Ghost Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Cristina Avramut, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





2.
The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Cristina AvramutCristina Avramut

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)


Dated: June 14, 2011
No. 00-7075.

#### Stansel *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**MEMORANDUM**

**TO:** DOCKET #: EPA

–HQ

– OAR

–2014

– 0198 **FROM:** Rebecca von dem Hagen, EPA/Stratospheric Protection Division **RE:** SNAP Sector Workshops and Stakeholder Meetings The following is the list of SNAP sector workshops and stakeholder meetings held by EPA prior to this rulemaking. Meeting m aterials are included in this docket as attachments to this memo
. List of SNAP Stakeholder Workshops and Meetings: March 19, 2013 Aerosols Sector Stakeholder Workshop April 26, 2013 Foam Sector Stakeholder Workshop August 22, 2013 SNAP Stakeholder Meeting November 15, 2013 Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Sector Stakeholder Workshop: Household

Appliances December 4, 2013 Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Sector Stakeholder Workshop: Stationary Air

C onditio ning December 4, 2013 Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Sector Stakehol der Workshop: Motor

Vehicle Air C onditioning December 16, 2013 Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Sector Stakeh older Workshop: Commercial

and Industrial Refrigeration February 4, 2 014 SNAP Stakeholder Meeting March 5, 20 14 Fire Protection Sector Stakeholder Workshop
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2350

NESLY CESAR, Petitioner,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: August 18, 2009 Decided: September 2, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Cindy S. Ferrier, Senior Litigation Counsel, Joseph A. O’Connell, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Nesly Cesar, a native and citizen of Haiti, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen or reconsider. We have
reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of
discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2009). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the
Board. In re: Cesar (B.I.A. Nov. 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
# What is the Defense Logistics Agency? 

/ Published June 29, 2017
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Logistics is a tough word to understand. So what is it? Watch this video to learn about logistics and how it fits into the Defense Logistics Agency mission. 

*View open caption.*
# Israel Security Assistance Liaison Officers visits DLA Distribution

/ Published Dec. 14, 2017
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., Israel Security Assistance Liaison Officers visited the largest distribution center in the Defense Logistics Agency Distribution network, DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, on Dec. 11 to learn about DLA’s global logistics processes and how DLA Distribution supports foreign military sales customers.  
Scott Rosbaugh, director of strategic plans at DLA Distribution headquarters, led a discussion which highlighted DLA Distribution’s worldwide network, special functions the command provides - such as kitting and hazardous material handling - and transportation coordination that the organization provides for all of DLA. The group expressed interest in learning more about how the complete distribution chain works from the point of order, how it’s processed through the system and the path of transportation to reach end state. 

Upon completion of the DLA presentation discussion, the group toured the Unit Materiel Fielding Point where they were able to put eyes on their specific FMS items and ask direct questions on how it’s processed through the system.

To better visualize how the distribution process works, the group visited DLA Distribution Susquehanna’s Eastern Distribution Center, the largest warehouse in the Department of Defense.  They toured the receiving, processing, storage, retrieval and outloading operations, where they saw the supply chain in action.  The tour included the organization’s key locations, including the Consolidation and Containerization Point, the high-rise storage and retrieval system, and the air line of communication pallet build area. 

The visit’s purpose allowed the Israel Security Liaison Officers to meet and greet face-to-face for a LIVEEX meeting with DLA Distribution Strategic Plan representatives and counterparts, and participate in an orientation to DLA’s Distribution Operations.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                    SUBSIDIARIES OF DADE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    STATE OR JURISDICTION OF
        SUBSIDIARY                                INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION
        ----------                                -----------------------------
<S>                                               <C>
Dade B.V.........................................        The Netherlands
Dade AG..........................................          Switzerland
Dade Diagnosticos Lda............................           Portugal
Dade Diagnosticos, SL............................             Spain
Dade Diagnostics Corporation.....................            Canada
Dade Diagnostics of P.R., Inc....................           Delaware
Dade Diagnostics Pty. Ltd........................           Australia
Dade Diagnostika GmbH............................            Germany
Dade Export Corporation..........................           Delaware
Dade Foreign Sales Corporation...................         Barbados W.I.
Dade Finance, Inc................................           Delaware
Dade Limited.....................................             Japan
Dade Ltda........................................            Brazil
Dade MicroScan Inc...............................           Delaware
Dade S.A.........................................            Belgium
Dade S.A.........................................            France
Dade S.A. de CV..................................            Mexico
Dade S.p.A.......................................             Italy
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of First Century Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that to such officers knowledge, the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: March 28, 2008 |  |                                      
|                      |  | /s/ R. W. Wilkinson                  
|                      |  | R. W. Wilkinson                      
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
RE: RIN 2060-AP52 - RIA Ch 6-8 

 12/16/2011 08:20 PM 

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy Cole/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Hi, 

Can you have the attached clean files uploaded by OP into ROCIS? I’ve 

opened it for amendment. I’ll be sending the rest of the clean RIA in a 

subsequent email. 

 

Regards, 

Cortney 

 

 

From: Higgins, Cortney 

Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 8:19 PM 

To: Bob Wayland (Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov) 

Cc: Maxwell.Bill@epamail.epa.gov; Cole.Amy@epamail.epa.gov 

Subject: RE: RIN 2060-AP52 - RIA Ch 5 

 

Hi, 

Can you have the attached clean files uploaded by OP into ROCIS? I’ve 

opened it for amendment. I’ll be sending the rest of the clean RIA in a 

subsequent email. 

 

Regards, 

Cortney 

 

 

From: Higgins, Cortney 

Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 8:16 PM 

To: Bob Wayland (Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov) 

Cc: Maxwell.Bill@epamail.epa.gov; Cole.Amy@epamail.epa.gov 

Subject: RIN 2060-AP52 

 

Hi, 

Can you have the attached clean files uploaded by OP into ROCIS? I’ve 

opened it for amendment. I’ll be sending the rest of the clean RIA in a 

subsequent email. 

 

Regards, 

Cortney 

Chapter 6_EmploymentandEconomicImpactsfinal.docx 
Chapter 7_StatutoryandExecutiveOrderAnalyses_1216 FINAL.DOCX 

Chapter 8_SummaryofCostsandBenefits_1216_FINAL.DOC
Exhibit 32

                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of SLS International,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
John Gott, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ John Gott
---------------------
John Gott
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
November 18, 2003


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1694 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1694

   To require the Secretary of Energy to submit to Congress a report 
 describing the method by which existing reporting systems within the 
Department of Energy can be coordinated to provide timely reporting of 
 significant supply interruptions in the transmission of petroleum and 
                      petroleum-related products.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 2005

  Mr. Burr (for himself and Mr. Allen) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of Energy to submit to Congress a report 
 describing the method by which existing reporting systems within the 
Department of Energy can be coordinated to provide timely reporting of 
 significant supply interruptions in the transmission of petroleum and 
                      petroleum-related products.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPORT ON CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR SIGNIFICANT INTERRUPTIONS IN 
              ENERGY TRANSMISSION.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of Energy shall submit to Congress a report 
describing existing plans and procedures of the Department of Energy 
relating to a significant interruption, as determined by the Secretary, 
in the transmission of petroleum or a petroleum-related product.
    (b) Inclusions.--The report under subsection (a) shall include--
            (1) a description of the method by which the Secretary 
        shall notify the Governor and any Federal elected official of a 
        State affected by a significant interruption in the 
        transmission of petroleum or a petroleum-related product; and
            (2) recommendations with respect to any legislative action 
        relating to the implementation or efficiency of a contingency 
        plan of the Department of Energy.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MCI WORLDCOM, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             876
<SECURITIES>                                         6
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,868
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,122
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,324
<PP&E>                                          33,728
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (5,110)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  91,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,226
<BONDS>                                         13,128
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              798
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            28
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,210
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    91,072
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,120
<CGS>                                           15,951
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (242)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   951
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 966
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,164
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,965
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,013
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,941
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.35


</TABLE>
### Fw: Interagency Review of EPA SOx /NOx Secondary Standard
Jan King to: Sherry Russell 07/12/2011 09:14 AM

Jan King Regulatory Development and Policy Analysis Group phone: (919) 541-5665 fax: (919) 541-2664

Mailcode: C404-05

----- Forwarded by Jan King/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/12/2011 09:14 AM -----

From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Laity, James A." <James

_ A.

_ Laity@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, John Hannon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jan King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/07/2011 06:07 PM Subject: Fw: Interagency Review of EPA SOx/NOx Secondary Standard

Jim,

Karen wrote a quick response to your questions. I hope these are helpful.

The proposed 1-hr secondary standard of 75 ppb would generally be more stringent than the current 3-hr, 500 ppb secondary standard, although the relative degree of stringency would vary due to differences in temporal air quality patterns in different areas. The proposal notice proposes to keep the current 3-hr

standard and to add the 1-hr standard.

The current secondary standard for NO2 is an annual standard of 53 ppb, which is the same as the annual NO2 primary standard. The proposal notice proposes to keep the current annual standard and to add the 1-hr standard of 100 ppb, which is identical to the 1-hr NO2 primary standard set in 2010.

The effect of setting secondary standards identical to the new 1-hr primary standard would be to recognize the ecological benefit of the reductions in oxides of nitrogen and sulfur that will result from strategies to meet the new 1-hr standards. It would not result in any areas receiving less protection, while some areas will receive directionally more protection than that afforded by only the current secondary

standards.

"Laity, Jim" 07/07/2011 05:17:35 PM Lydia, Karen, Could you give me a quick answer...

From: "Laity, Jim" <James

_ A.

_ Laity@omb.eop.gov>

To: Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/07/2011 05:17 PM Subject: FW: Interagency Review of EPA SOx/NOx Secondary Standard

Lydia, Karen, Could you give me a quick answer to the questions below:

For Sox, Is the proposed secondary NAAQS of 75 ppb over 1 hour more stringent than the current .5 ppm (500

ppb) over 3 hours? Are you also keeping the current secondary standard? What is the practical effect of setting

the secondary NAAQs for NOx and SOx at the same level as the primary? i.e. Are there areas that will receive less

protection or more protection?What is the current NAAQS for NOx? According to EPA’s website ( http :// www

. epa

. gov / air / criteria

. html ), it

appears that the secondary NAAQS for NOx is already the same as the primary? So, what is the effect of the

revised proposal?

Thanks, j im
EXHIBIT
32.2








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
of BigString Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2008 (the “Report”), I, Robert S. DeMeulemeester, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d),
      and,




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Dated:  November
      14, 2008
            /s/
      Robert S. DeMeulemeesterRobert
      S. DeMeulemeesterChief
      Financial Officer