alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Texarkana distribution center hosts benchmarking visit with Corpus Christi sister site

/ Published Jan. 18, 2018
TEXARKANA, Texas, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Corpus Christi, Texas commander Army Lt. Col. Daniel Bidetti, along with his accountable officer and Stock Readiness team visited Army Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chamberlain, commander of DLA Distribution Red River, Texas and team on Jan. 10 and 11 to share information about their dashboard and stock readiness best practices. 
The custom dashboard pulls information directly from Distribution Standard System and provides real-time data updates across every measurable function at the distribution center using an access database with an easy to use web-like front page accessible to the entire workforce.  

Dewayne “Zing” Zingarelli, accountable officer, has spent the last 10 years developing, customizing and hosting this type of dashboard capability at Corpus Christi to better manage distribution operations at the center level.  

Micki Usrey, DSS systems analyst and Vickie Anderson, Logistics Modernization Program supply systems analyst at Red River, worked with Zingarelli, and in two days developed an initial dashboard operating capability. 

Additionally, Red River was able to share a dashboard for LMP developed by their accountable officer, Donald Wallace to implement at Corpus Christi. Both Stock Readiness teams were able to identify and resolve some common issues at each distribution center, specifically those related to Army Aviation materiel stored at both locations.  

“We currently pull 255 reports daily to manage our business.  Now, we can immediately access the information we need all day, every day to improve our productivity and efficiency,” said Red River deputy commander Fred Hildrich.  

This visit allowed both Corpus Christi and Red River to establish a closer working relationship with plans to continue best practice engagement and discussion on a regular basis across functional areas.
No. 00-6945.

#### Buchanan *v.*South Carolina Department of Corrections et al.

Sup. Ct. S. C. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Thomas Equipment, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Luigi Lobasso, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


Date: October 6, 2005                    By: /s/ LUIGI LOBASSO
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Luigi Lobasso
                                             Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Thomas Equipment, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Clifford M. Rhee, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

Date: January 17, 2006                   By: /s/ CLIFFORD M. RHEE
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Clifford M. Rhee
                                             President
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1659 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1659

         To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 12, 2005

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON A CERTAIN CHEMICAL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.39.09       Adsorbent resin    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         comprised of a                                                     31/2008
                         macroporous
                         polymer of
                         diethenylbenzene,
                         (CAS No. 9003-69-
                         4) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         3911.90.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Employees required to abide by Hatch Act
 
  By DLA Public Affairs
  Note: The following is a message sent to all Defense Logistics Agency employees from DLA Chief of Staff Kristin French.  With the election season now in full swing, it’s important that DLA employees be aware of rules that apply to them under the provisions of the Hatch Act, 5 U.S.C. Section 7323, which limits political activities of all federal employees. The rules vary based on duty status and position but apply to all activities directed toward the success or failure of any political party or candidate.  On March 5, 2018, the U.S. Office of Special Counsel noted that President Trump officially announced his candidacy for reelection. Political activity surrounding the Trump campaign is therefore prohibited and includes displaying unofficial photos of the President in the workplace, as well as placing campaign-related posts on social media while on official duty. The same is true for activities associated with any political candidate. For example, the wear, display or distribution of items with the slogan “Make America Great Again” violates rules under the Hatch Act. Similarly, posting “#Resist Trump” on social media while on duty or displaying such a banner in the work place is prohibited.  Members of the Armed Forces are not covered by the Hatch Act, but similar restrictions apply. Service members must comply with DoD Directive 1344.10. Per longstanding DoD policy, active duty personnel may not engage in partisan political activities and all military personnel should avoid the impression that their political activities imply or appear to imply DoD sponsorship, approval or endorsement of a political candidate, campaign or cause.  You can find more information about what political activity is prohibited or permitted on- and off-duty by clicking the “Hatch Act Guidance” button in the top right corner at www.dla.mil.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6707

ALTON GREGORY SIMMONS-BEY, a/k/a Gregory Simmons-Bey,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

J. L. GODWIN, Magistrate; J. D. RATTELADE, Raleigh Police Department; M. S. 

KOZAZCKI, II, Raleigh Police Department; AMY BREIGHTON, Magistrate; 

NANCY MCFARLAND, Mayor of Raleigh,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:19-ct-03080-FL)

Submitted: August 20, 2019 Decided: August 23, 2019

Before FLOYD and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alton Simmons, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Alton Simmons appeals the district court’s order dismissing Simmons’ 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Simmons v. Godwin, No. 5:19-ct-03080-FL (E.D.N.C. May 2, 2019). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
# Industrial Hardware’s ‘PR Madness’ consumes supply chain

/ Published March 29, 2018
PHILADELPHIA, 
While many college basketball fans’ brackets were busted early, the PR Madness continues for the Industrial Hardware supply chain at the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support. 

IH’s play on the annual college hoops tournament has grown and evolved with the supply chain’s priorities. But PR Madness, first held in 2015, still stirs employees’ competitive spirits and has been a boost to productivity. 

Joanne Anello and Mike Tarkett, the chiefs of IH’s two traditional acquisition divisions, created the competition. Anello said she developed a love for college basketball while watching games at the University of Pennsylvania’s famed Palestra. 

“March Madness is my favorite sports competition, and I have always thought [about] how cool it would be to do something modeled after it,” Anello said. “Mike [Tarkett] and I saw it would have a positive impact on production, reducing backorders and aged purchase requests, team building and boosting morale.”

Modifying the win-to-advance concept of the college basketball tournament, Anello and Tarkett developed point values for different categories of acquisitions, depending on their level of complexity. 

Other IH divisions have joined the madness this year. Jose Pereira, traditional technical division chief, and Andrea Woodring, supply division chief, have found ways to adopt the system so their employees can join tournament teams such as the PR Pirates, Philly Special and week three leaders, Nuclear Enterprise. 

Instead of battling for acquisitions, the traditional technical division refined the competition for its diverse teams: technical data, quality, testing and engineering.

“I wanted to make sure the folks in [my division] were recognized for all the hard work they do in different areas, and this is a great way to recognize employees’ contributions,” Pereira said. 

The traditional supply division has a “buzzer beater” style race to meet a goal – to reduce certain inventory documents by 50 percent – by the end of the competition. 

Tarkett spurs on the competition by composing SportsCenter-style weekly updates. In he week two wrap-up, Tarkett wrote that Philly Special’s Ken Price, last year’s Most Valuable Player, had  ”shook off the rust” for this year’s competition. Teammate Ryan Cunningham was quoted in the week three update about Price’s big performance.

 “When Ken gets in the zone, we all just get out of his way,” Cunningham mused.

As the competition heats up, the teams have their eyes on the prize. The highest scoring teams in each division receive monetary or time-off awards.

Anello said the competition’s benefits continue after March ends. 

“I see residual effects after PR Madness is over,” Anello said. “I noticed that there is a lot more knowledge sharing and helping one another across the divisions.”
PR Madness ends on April 13, and winners will be announced by team and individual high scorers for recognition by IH leaders.
Keeping our wheels rolling
 
  By Airman 1st Class Benjamin Cooper
                               Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Royal Air Force Mildenhall website.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 153 (Friday, August 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21019]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,612]


Baker School Specialty Company, Incorporated, Orange, 
Massachusetts; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on June 30, 1997 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed by the company on behalf of workers at Baker School Specialty 
Company, Incorporated, located in Orange, Massachusetts.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, D.C. this 30th day of July, 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-21019 Filed 8-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### STATE of Louisiana v. John L. BREAUX.

No. 60393.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 27, 1977.

Bertrand De Blanc, Lafayette, David J. Dennis, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., J. Nathan Stansbury, Dist. Atty., David F. Hutchins, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EPA_OG_Compressors_Comments - MSC

Good afternoon,

On behalf of Mr. Dave Spigelmyer, President of the Marcellus Shale Coalition, attached are our comments on the 

EPA White Paper on Oil and Natural Gas Sector Compressors

Thank you,

Loren

Loren A. Anderson, CPESC

Strategic Projects Manager

24 Summit Park Drive, 2nd Fl.

Pittsburgh, PA 15275

Office: 412.706.5160, Ext. 105

Mobile: 412.335.1912

http://www.marcelluscoalition.org/

SHALE INSIGHTTM 2014 Conference 

September 24­25, 2014 | Pittsburgh, PA

David L. Lawrence Convention Center 

www.shaleinsight.com

Loren Anderson <landerson@marcelluscoalition.org>

Mon 6/16/2014 1:29 PM

To:OilandGas.Whitepapers <OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov>; 

 1 attachment

EPA_OG_Sector_Compressors_Comments_MSC.pdf; 

EPA_OG_Compressors_Comments - MSC - OilandGas.Whitepapers Page 1 of 1

https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/ 8/26/2014
#### PRODUCTION CREDIT ASSOCIATIONS OF FLORIDA and Federal Land Bank Associations of Florida, Petitioners, v. The DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE of the State of Florida, the Florida Association of Insurance Agents and the Florida Farm Bureau Federation, Respondents.

No. FF-277.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 1, 1978.

Rehearing Denied March 30, 1978.

J. R. Lowry, of Lowry & Ritch, Gaines-ville, Joseph C. Jacobs and Robert J. Anger-er, of Ervin, Varn, Jacobs, Odom & Kitchen, Tallahassee, for petitioners.

James N. McConnaughhay, of Harris, Liles, McConnaughhay & Weidner, Edward L. Kutter and E. Harper Field, of Keen, O’Kelley & Spitz, Tallahassee, for respondents.

BOOTH, Judge.

This cause is before the Court on Petition for Review of final agency action of the Respondent, Department of Insurance, State of Florida. The order sought to be reviewed holds that employees of Petitioners, Production Credit Associations of Florida and Federal Land Bank Associations of Florida, may not be licensed as insurance agents by Respondents due to the prohibition of *Florida Statute*§ 626.988, providing in part as follows:

> “(1) For the purpose of this section the following definitions shall apply:

> (a) ‘Financial institution’ means any bank, bank holding company, savings and loan association, savings and loan association holding company, or savings and loan association service corporation or any subsidiary, affiliate, or foundation of any one of the foregoing .

> 

> (2) No insurance agent or solicitor licensed by the department of insurance under the provisions of this chapter who is associated with, under contract with, retained by, owned or controlled by, to any degree, directly or indirectly, or employed by, a financial institution shall engage in insurance agency activities as an employee, officer, director, agent, or associate of a financial institution agency. . ."

*32Respondent correctly determined that Petitioners are financial institutions 1 within the meaning of the above-quoted statute and that employees of Petitioners may not be licensed as insurance agents.

Insurance is an industry affected with a public interest2 and subject to regulation by the States.3 The Legislature has determined that there is potential for abuse inherent in financial institutions being involved in the sale of insurance, and that the licensing of employees of financial institutions as insurance agents is not in the public interest. No valid basis exists, either in the terms of the statute itself, or on the facts, for distinguishing Petitioners from any other lending institution in this regard.

Accordingly, Petition for Review is DENIED.

McCORD, C. J., and SMITH, J., concur.

1

. See, 12 U.S.C. §§ 2012 & 2072, setting out powers and functions of federal land banks and intermediate credit banks.

2

*. Springer v. Colburn,*162 So.2d 513 (Fla.1964); 18 Fla.Jur., Insurance, § 16.

3

. “McCarran Act,” 15 U.S.C. §§ 1011-1015.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000723610
<NAME> STRATUS COMPUTER, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1997
<CASH>                                          166560
<SECURITIES>                                     81080
<RECEIVABLES>                                   133101
<ALLOWANCES>                                      8422
<INVENTORY>                                      83405
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                497244
<PP&E>                                          399972
<DEPRECIATION>                                  253847
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  709777
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           136782
<BONDS>                                            750
<COMMON>                                           275
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      571970
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    709777
<SALES>                                         348944
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                498260
<CGS>                                           180912
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   348906
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (9073)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  65946
<INCOME-TAX>                                     14508
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              51438
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     51438
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.10



</TABLE>
****Scheduled Agency Reports and Summaries**USDA Economics and Statistics System December 1998**
```

[106th Congress Public Law 473]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ473.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 2083]]

Public Law 106-473
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To require the Secretary of the Interior to complete a resource study of 
      the 600 mile route through Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, 
  Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and 
 Virginia, used by George Washington and General Rochambeau during the 
   American Revolutionary War. <<NOTE: Nov. 9, 2000 -  [H.R. 4794]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: Washington-Rochambeau 
Revolutionary Route National Heritage Act of 2000.>>  assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Washington-Rochambeau Revolutionary 
Route National Heritage Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. STUDY OF THE WASHINGTON-ROCHAMBEAU REVOLUTIONARY ROUTE.

    (a) <<NOTE: Deadline.>>  In General.--Not later than 2 years after 
the date on which funds are made available to carry out this section, 
the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Resources of the House of 
Representatives, a resource study of the 600 mile route through 
Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, 
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Virginia, used by George Washington and 
General Jean Baptiste Donatien de Vimeur, comte de Rochambeau during the 
American Revolutionary War.

    (b) Consultation.--In conducting the study required by subsection 
(a), the Secretary shall consult with State and local historic 
associations and societies, State historic preservation agencies, and 
other appropriate organizations.
    (c) Contents.--The study shall--
            (1) identify the full range of resources and historic themes 
        associated with the route referred to in subsection (a), 
        including its relationship to the American Revolutionary War;
            (2) identify alternatives for National Park Service 
        involvement with preservation and interpretation of the route 
        referred to in subsection (a); and

[[Page 114 STAT. 2084]]

            (3) include cost estimates for any necessary acquisition, 
        development, interpretation, operation, and maintenance 
        associated with the alternatives identified pursuant to 
        paragraph (2).

    Approved November 9, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4794:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Oct. 23, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 27, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit No. 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
                             PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No.  333-36194  filed on May 3, 2000 and No.  333-144951
filed on July 30, 2007) of First Litchfield Financial Corporation and Subsidiary
of our report  dated  March 31, 2008  relating to our audit of the  consolidated
financial  statements,  which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First
Litchfield Financial  Corporation and Subsidiary for the year ended December 31,
2007.

/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
---------------------------

New Haven, Connecticut
March 31, 2008

                                       40