alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DAU fellows, Troop Support talk about acquisition processes during annual visit

/ Published April 6, 2018
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support hosted the Defense Acquisition University Senior Service College Fellowship Program participants to learn about the agency’s mission during a visit April 3.

Leaders from each of DLA Troop Support’s five supply chains met with the fellows, who traveled from Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.

“These senior acquisition leaders have varied backgrounds that contribute to a professional discourse on best practices, emerging trends, acquisition strategy and organizational leadership,” said Air Force Col. Adrian Crowley, Industrial Hardware director. “As the [Defense Department] becomes more interconnected and interdependent, it is vital to strengthen relationships between the senior acquisition leaders and the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support.”

The SSCF program is a 10-month leadership and educational opportunity. It prepares Army Acquisition Corps civilian leaders for roles as product and project managers, program executive officers, Senior Executive Service positions and other key acquisition positions, according to the DAU website.

Visiting DLA Troop Support provides another Defense Department acquisitions perspective before the fellows head to their follow-on assignment, James Oman, SSCF APG director, said. 

“This visit provides a unique experience most of the participants have never been exposed to,” Oman said. “We’re thankful for DLA Troop Support for serving as another resource and helping the fellows’ professional development as they continue their careers.”

Crowley explained the importance of raising awareness about the agency’s capabilities to current and future customers.

“DLA Troop Support has an incredible breadth and depth of capabilities across five supply chains, the Product Test Center and the command staff,” Crowley said. “Key outreach engagements such as this enable our customers a broader understanding of Troop Support’s robust posture to provide effective and efficient acquisition capabilities in support of the warfighter and whole of government.”

For some of the participants, the visit provided a broader view of the acquisition process.

“One of the biggest takeaways was seeing the people who support the warfighter and understanding the challenges they face,” John Gillette, a SSCF program participant, said. “To see with my own eyes the people who support us, learn their ordering process and establish contacts here at DLA Troop Support is helpful moving forward.”

Before departing, the participants also visited the DLA Troop Support flag room, where the presidential and vice presidential flags are hand embroidered and military flags are made.
Exhibt
      99.1





PRESS
      RELEASE






























NAUGATUCK
      VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION


ANNOUNCES
      STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM





Naugatuck,
      Connecticut. February 19,
      2008. – Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation (NasdaqGM: NVSL) today announced
      that the Company’s board of directors has authorized the repurchase of up to
      361,207 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock, or approximately 5% of
      the outstanding shares held by persons other than Naugatuck Valley Mutual
      Holding Company.  The Company expects to begin the program as soon as
      practicable.





Repurchases,
      which will be conducted through open market purchases or privately-negotiated
      transactions, will be made from time to time depending on market conditions
      and
      other factors.  Repurchased shares will be held in the Company’s
      treasury.





Naugatuck
      Valley Financial Corporation is the holding company for Naugatuck Valley Savings
      and Loan, headquartered in Naugatuck, Connecticut.  In addition to its
      main office, Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan operates eight branch offices
      in
      Southwest Connecticut. Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan is a community-oriented
      financial institution dedicated to serving the financial service needs of
      consumers and businesses within its market area.





This
      release contains "forward-looking statements" which may describe future plans
      and strategies, including our expectations of future financial
      results.  Management's ability to predict results or the effect of
      future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain.  Factors that
      could affect our actual results include market interest rate trends, the general
      regional and national economic market, our ability to control costs and
      expenses, actions by our competitors and their pricing, loan delinquency rates,
      and changes in federal and state regulation.  As we have no control
      over these factors, they should be considered in evaluating any forward-looking
      statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Except
      as
      required by applicable law or regulation, Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation
      disclaims any obligation to update such forward-looking statements.





Contact:





John
      C.
      Roman


Or


Lee
      R.
      Schlesinger


(203)
      720-5000
## Appendix A. Complete

‐ Mix Activated Sludge: Bioreactor and Secondary Clarifier

Flow Rate,
MGD Capital Costs, $MM (2007) Capital Costs, $MM (2010) [ENR CCI] Total (O&M) Labor Costs, $MM Total Energy Costs, $MM [$0.1/kwh] Material Costs, $MM Total O&M Costs, $MM
0.5 3.57 3.9 0.123 0.0343 0.0178 0.1751
5 16.8 18.6 0.275 0.327 0.0762 0.6782
10 27.9 30.8 0.378 0.644 0.109 1.131
25 92.6 102.3 0.612 1.61 0.205 2.427
50 149 164.6 0.913 3.22 0.318 4.451

% of O&M that is labor % of O&M that is
energy 70% 20% 41% 48% 33% 57% 25% 66% 21% 72% Avg 38% 53%

Source: CapdetWorks v2.5

Design Basis mg/L
BOD 400
COD 908 

## y = 5.9749x 0.8228



## R2 = 0.9804

0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0 180.0

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 

# Capital Costs, $MM (2010) [ENR CCI]

3 5 

# Total Energy Costs, $MM [$0.1/kwh] Comparison of EPA 1980 and CapdetWorks Capital y = 0.2546x 0.6969 

## R2 = 0.9898

0 0.5

1 1.5

2 2.5

3 3.5

4 4.5

5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 

# Total O&M Costs, $MM

A

‐ 1 Capdet Works Capital Cost Updated EPA 1980 Capital Cost
3 4
22 23
40 38
84 74
149 123 

## y = 0.0674x 0.9856 

## R2 = 1

0 0.5

1 1.5

2 2.5

3 3.5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 

# Total Energy Costs, $ MM [ $ 0.1 / kwh]

0 50 100 150 200

12345$MM 

## Comparison of EPA 1980 and CapdetWorks Capital Cost

Capdet Works Capital Cost Updated EPA 1980 Capital Cost

A

‐ 1
----

|   | (1) | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Corporation. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                  Douglas Stewart                                    |     |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
|   | Douglas                  Stewart, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                                                    |
|   | Date:  May                  15 2007                           |
|   |                                                                    |
|   |                                                                    |
|   |                                                                    |
|   | /s/                  Debra A. Geuy                                      |          |
|   | Debra                  A. Geuy, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer   |
|   |                                                                    |
|   | Date:  May                  15, 2007                          |

----
Exhibit
No. 5























December
18, 2008





Middlesex Water Company


1500
Ronson Road


Iselin,
New Jersey 08830





Dear
Sirs:





We refer
you to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the "Registration Statement")
filed today with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, by Middlesex Water Company (the "Company") pertaining to
the offer and sale by the Company of up to 100,000 shares of the Company's
Common Stock, no par value (the “Common Shares”).





We have
acted as counsel to the Company in connection with the Registration
Statement.  In such capacity, we have examined the Registration
Statement, copies of the Company's Certificate of Incorporation and amendments
thereto, certificates of officers of the Company and of public officials and
such other corporate records and documents as we have deemed necessary in order
to express the opinion set forth below.





In our
examination, we have assumed the legal capacity of all natural persons, the
genuineness of all signatures, the authenticity of all documents submitted to us
as originals, the conformity to original documents of documents submitted to us
as certified, conformed or photostatic copies and the authenticity of such
original documents.





Based
upon the foregoing examination, it is our opinion that offer and sale of the
Common Shares has been duly authorized by the Company, and upon the issuance of
certificates evidencing the Common Shares and delivery thereof in exchange for
payment therefor as described in the Registration Statement, then the Common
Shares shall be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.














We hereby
consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement
and the reference to our firm in prospectus included in such Registration
Statement under the heading "Legal Matters".





Very
      truly yours,NORRIS
      McLAUGHLIN & MARCUS, P.A./s/NORRIS
      McLAUGHLIN & MARCUS
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 07166

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 07166\07166_Checklist_.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

07166\07166_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

07166\07166_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 07166\07166_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07166\07166_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07166\07166_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07166\07166_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07166\07166_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07166\Supplemental Documents\07166_Part A - MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

07166\Supplemental Documents\07166_Part A - MAP-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07166\Supplemental Documents\Part A - WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

07166\07166_Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1666 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1666

         To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 12, 2005

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON A CERTAIN CHEMICAL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following:

``      9902.39.14      Ion Exchange resin  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         powder comprised                                                   31/2008
                         of a copolymer of
                         methacrylic acid
                         cross-linked with
                         divinylbenzene,
                         in the hydrogen
                         ionic form, dried
                         to less than 5%
                         moisture (CAS No.
                         50602-21-6)(provi
                         ded for in
                         subheading
                         3914.00.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      I,  Alex  Werber,  the Chief  Financial  Officer  of  Tissera,  Inc.  (the
      "Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
      ended October 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
      of Section  13 (a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.


Dated: January 13, 2004


                                              By: /s/Alex Werber
                                                 -------------------------------
                                              Name: Alex Werber
                                              Title: Chief Financial Officer
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 172

AN ACT

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to

provide for the regulation of all contact lenses as medical

devices, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 172 ES

1 SECTION 1. REGULATION OF CERTAIN ARTICLES AS MED2 ICAL DEVICES.

3 Section 520 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic

4 Act (21 U.S.C. 360j) is amended by adding at the end

5 the following subsection:

6 ‘‘Regulation of Contact Lens as Devices

7 ‘‘(n)(1) All contact lenses shall be deemed to be de8 vices under section 201(h).

9 ‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) shall not be construed as bearing

10 on or being relevant to the question of whether any prod11 uct other than a contact lens is a device as defined by

12 section 201(h) or a drug as defined by section 201(g).’’.

Passed the Senate July 29, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 172

AN ACT

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic

lenses as medical devices, and for other purposes.Act to provide for the regulation of all contact
Order entered October 4, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00540-CV

MACKLE WHITE, Appellant

V.

NATHANIEL WHITE, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-20-05419-C

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case is overdue. By postcard dated August 26, 

2021, we notified Janet Wright, Official Court Reporter for County Court at Law 

No 3, that the reporter’s record was overdue and directed her to file the reporter’s 

record within thirty days.

To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed and Ms. Wright has not 

corresponded with the Court regarding the reporter’s record. Because our records 

indicate appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, we ORDER
Janet Wright, to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, either (1) 

the reporter’s record; (2) written verification no hearings were recorded; or written 

verification that appellant has not requested preparation of the reporter’s record.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to:

Honorable Sally Montgomery 

Presiding Judge

County Court at Law No. 3 

Janet Wright

Official Court Reporter

County Court at Law No. 3

All parties

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22444]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-355-002]


CNG Transmission Corporation; Notice of Compliance Tariff Filing

August 19, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 14, 1997, CNG Transmission Corporation 
(CNG), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, with an 
effective date of June 1, 1997:

Second Sub. Original Sheet No. 209
Substitute Original Sheet No. 211

    CNG states that the purpose of this filing is to further revise 
CNG's mainline pooling service in two respects. As directed by the 
Commission in its July 30 Order, slip op. at 4, CNG omits Section 4.3 
of Rate Schedule MPS from Sheet No. 209, which had referred to 
negotiation of the imbalance fee established by Section 4.1.A. CNG has 
also revised the treatment of imbalances in Section 6 of Rate Schedule 
MPS, ``to reflect the assessment of imbalance penalties comparable to 
the penalties under Rate Schedules FT, IT, and MCS.'' July 30 Order, at 
6. Specifically, CNG has revised Sections 4.1.A and Section 6.5 so that 
unresolved MPS-based imbalances will be subject to the same imbalance 
management provisions that are currently applicable to Wheeling Service 
under CNG's Rate Schedule MCS.
    CNG states that copies of its filing have been mailed to the 
parties to the captioned proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC, 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22444 Filed 8-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Order entered February 17 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 00331 - CR No. 05 - 14 - 00332 - CR No. 05 - 14 - 00333 - CR No. 05 - 14 - 00334 - CR NEKO EARSY BOYKIN, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the C riminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F13 - 12601 - J , F13 - 58095 - J, F13 - 58096 - J, F13 - 58097 - J 

### O RDER The Court REINSTATE S the appeals. On January 12, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the appeals; (2) appellant is indigent and represented by court

- appointed counsel Nanette Hendrickson; (3) Ms. Hendrickson’s explanation for the delay in filing the br ief is her workload; and (4) Ms. Hendrickson requested thirty days from the February 10, 2015 findings to file appellant’s brief.We ORDER appellant to file his brief by MARCH 13, 2015 . We note the brief was

originally due September 25, 2014, and appellan t has already been granted one thirty

- day extension of time to file the brief. It is now four months overdue. Accordingly, no further extensions will be granted. If the brief is not the date specified, the Court will utilize the available remedies, whic h may include order that Nanette Hendrickson be removed as counsel and that new counsel be appointed. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Gracie Lewis, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 3, and to counsel for all parties. /s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
**List by Subject: MiscellaneousReports are indicated with the symbol Datasets are marked with the symbol 
Capacity of Refrigerated Warehouses (NASS)Cold Storage (NASS)Cold Storage--Annual Summary (NASS)Consolidated Federal Funds FY 94-5 (ERS)ERS Publications (ERS)Pest Management Practices (NASS)Referendum CVM Programs (ERS)Rural/Urban Continuum Codes (ERS)USDA Historical Budget Outlays (ERS)World Population and Projections to 2050 (ERS)Year 2000 Computerized Systems Readiness Report (NASS)ZIPFIP Databases (ERS)ZIPFIP Package (ERS)USDA Economics and Statistics System
**
EXHIBIT
32.1





SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





In connection with the quarterly report
of Global Food Technologies, Inc. ("Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. Section 1350) that to their knowledge:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


Dated:  May
      14, 2010/s/ Keith
      MeeksKeith Meeks,
      President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Marshall F
      SparksMarshall F. Sparks,
      Chief Financial Officer