alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA Distribution hosts Army War College students

/ Published May 16, 2018
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Students from the United States Army War College met with DLA Distribution leadership and toured the Department of Defense’s largest warehouse as part of a curriculum which encourages routine engagement in discourse and debate on U.S. ground forces' role in achieving national security objectives.

DLA Distribution chief of staff Perry Knight led a discussion with the students where he explained how DLA Distribution has set up its network of distribution centers so that it is always prepared to facilitate the replenishment of supplies to troops around the world.  “The sun doesn’t set on DLA Distribution.  When they’re going to bed in Europe, they’re waking up in the Pacific.”

According to Knight, the organization has been taking a hard look at the way it is structured and its strategic locations around the world, particularly in light of Defense Secretary James Mattis’ concern of the potential for more than one Operation Plan to go into effect.  “It’s a priority right now for us to understand how we would support those requirements if needed and how we would best leverage our network.”

“It’s about constantly reevaluating our global positioning and working with the combatant commands to better understand where we’re needed to support the mission,” agreed Scott Rosbaugh, director of Future Plans.  

Referring to the organizations more than 50 sites worldwide, he added “We’re in these parts of the world because it allows us to ramp up operations very rapidly during wartime.  We can be pitching and catching supplies across the globe.”

The group was also informed of DLA Distribution’s expeditionary capability, which allows the organization to forward deploy civilian and military employees to support contingency operations anywhere in the globe.

The brief was followed by a tour of DLA Distribution Susquehanna’s 1.7 million square foot Eastern Distribution Center.  There, students witnessed the receipt, storage, and issuance of materiel firsthand, which was being sent to stateside customers as well as those outside the continental United States.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 165 (Tuesday, August 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22867]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Tuesday, September 2, 1997.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-3207, beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting.

    Dated: August 22, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-22867 Filed 8-22-97; 3:44 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
**U.S. Fruit, Nut, and Berry Farms (92005)**
Number Document/ Subject Date Author Recipient

D01 RBJ Final Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit 15-May-12 Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBP 

D02 RBJ Response to Comments 16-May-12 Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBP 

D03 RBJ Final Notice of Permit Issuance 16-May-12 Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBP 

D04 Public Comments Received 16-May-12 Numerous Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

Final Prevention of Signification Deterioration Permit Documents

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 9

Administrative Record Index

Rio Bravo Jasmin (RBJ) Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Permit

Permit No. SJ 85-07

May 2012
Number Document/ Subject Date Author Recipient

A01 RBJ Minor Modification Ambient Air Quality Impacts Report 2-Mar-12 Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBJ

A02 RBJ PSD Minor Modification Public Notice (English) 2-Mar-12 Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBJ

A03 RBJ PSD Minor Modification Public Notice (Spanish) 2-Mar-12 Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBJ

A04 RBJ Proposed Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit 2-Mar-12 Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, RBJ

Rio Bravo Jasmin (RBJ) Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit

Administrative Record Index

REGION 9

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Proposed Prevention of Signification Deterioration Documents

March 2012

Permit No. SJ 85-07
Number Document/ Subject Date Author Recipient

B01 Technical Support Document Facts 7-Nov-11 Ted Guth, Rio Bravo Jasmin Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

B02 Rio Bravo Jasmin Contact Information 18-Nov-11 Ted Guth, Rio Bravo Jasmin Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

B03 US Fish and Wildlife Services Discussion 8-Dec-11 Damian Higgins, US Fish and Wildlife Service Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

Rio Bravo Jasmin Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit

Administrative Record Index

REGION 9

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

E-mail Communications Related to Minor Modification of PSD Permit

March 2012

Permit No. SJ 85-07
Number Document/ Subject Date Author Recipient

C01 Minor Modification Request 17-May-10 Bill Rossiter, Rio Bravo Jasmin Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

C02 Site Specific Modification Questions 12-Oct-10 Bill Rossiter, Rio Bravo Jasmin Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

C03 Baseline Actual Calculations 27-Oct-10 Bill Rossiter, Rio Bravo Jasmin Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

C04 Trial Burn Extension Request 22-Jul-11 Maynard Adams, Rio Bravo Jasmin Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

C05 Greenhouse Gas Calculations 12-Oct-11 Eric Moller, Rio Bravo Jasmin Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

C06 Trial Burn Report 7-Nov-11 Catherine Castillo, Rio Bravo Jasmin Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9

C07 Application Completeness Determination 24-Feb-11 Omer Shalev, EPA Region 9 Steve Iliff, Rio Bravo Jasmin

Correspondence Material Related to Minor Modification of PSD Permit

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 9

Administrative Record Index

Rio Bravo Jasmin Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit

Permit No. SJ 85-07

March 2012
ex10-2.htm


    EXHIBIT
      10.2

     

    LANDBANK
      GROUP, INC.

    OPTION
      TERMINATION AGREEMENT

     

    


     

    THIS
      OPTION TERMINATION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made as of
      August __, 2007, by and among Landbank Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation
      (the
“Company”), and ___________________________ (the
“Option Holder”).

     

    RECITALS

     

    WHEREAS,
      the Option Holder received options (the “Options”), dated
      ____________, to purchase ___________ shares of the Common Stock, par value
      $0.0001 per share, of the Company;

     

    WHEREAS,
      as of the date hereof, the Option Holder has not exercised any of the Options,
      nor have any of the Options vested; and

     

    WHEREAS,
      the Company desires, and the Option Holder agrees, to explicitly terminate
      the
      Options as of the date of this Agreement;

     

    AGREEMENT

     

    NOW,
      THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration the sufficiency of which is
      hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree
      as
      follows:

     

    1.           Termination
      of Options.  The Company and the Option Holder hereby agree to
      terminate the Options, effective as of the date of this Agreement.

     

    2.           Authorization.  Each
      party hereto represents and warrants that it is authorized to take the actions
      contemplated hereunder and shall take such further actions and do such further
      things necessary to fulfill the purposes of this Agreement.

     

    3.           Governing
      Law.  This Agreement shall be governed, construed and interpreted
      in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without giving effect
      to
      principles of conflicts of law.

     

    


     

    [Signature
      Page Follows]

     

    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
      date
      first above written.

     

    


     

    LANDBANK
      GROUP, INC.

     

    


     

    By:                                                                  
      

     

    Name:                                                             
      

     

    Its:                                                                        

     

    


     

    OPTION
      HOLDER

     

    


     

    By:                                                                  
               

     

    Name:                                                                     

              
      (please print)
No. 00-7176.

#### Price *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 200 9-0 819

DCN: SE03953

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS I NFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
#### Clifton Kelly MASSEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. HH-242.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 28, 1977.

Clifton Kelly Massey, in pro per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and George R. Georgieff, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

MELVIN, Judge.

By Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, petitioner-defendant challenges the validity of a ten-year sentence “at hard labor” imposed upon him August 13, 1970, in the Circuit Court of Bradford County, Florida, for the offense of forgery and uttering a forgery (Case No. 2270). He urges that the offense is a third degree felony and that the maximum penalty is five years. Likewise, on August 13,1970, in the same court, in Case Numbers 2271 and 2272, he received *377concurrent five-year sentences for the offenses of forgery and uttering a forgery, each to be served “at hard labor”. We treat the petition as one to amend said sentences.

' When the petitioner was before the court for judgment and sentence, Section 831.01, Florida Statutes (1969) was applicable and provided a maximum sentence of ten years for such offense.

The provision “at hard labor”, appearing in said sentences, is merely surplusage and the same is hereby stricken as such. *McDonald*v. *State,*321 So.2d 453 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), and *Ussery v. State,*350 So.2d 839 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). As amended, the sentences referred to are

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, J., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1323 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1323

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
on Lindbald Avenue, Girdwood, Alaska, as the ``Dorothy and Connie Hibbs 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONNIE HIBBS OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located on Lindbald Avenue, in Girdwood, Alaska, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Dorothy and Connie Hibbs Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dorothy 
and Connie Hibbs Post Office Building''.

            Passed the Senate July 1, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1323

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
on Lindbald Avenue, Girdwood, Alaska, as the ``Dorothy and Connie Hibbs 
                        Post Office Building''.
```
Order entered March 20, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00584
- CV WAYNE RAND, Appellant

V. STEVE MCMASTERS, Appellee On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 11
- 13633



### O RDER The reporter’s record in this case is overdue. By postcard dated January 24, 2014, we notified the Court Reporter that the reporter’s record was overdue. We directed the Court Reporter to file the record within thirty days. To date, th e reporter’s record has not been filed.
We ORDER Antonette Regor, Official Court Reporter for the 68 th Judicial District Court, to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, either: (1) the reporter’s record; (2)
written verification that no heari ngs were recorded; or (3) written verification that appellant has not been found indigent and has not paid for the record. We notify appellant that if we receive verification he is not indigent and has not paid for the record, we will order the appeal sub mitted without the reporter’s record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(c)We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the

following persons:
Antonette Regor Official Court Reporter, 68 th Judicial District Court
/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>     1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-01-1998
<CASH>                                         612
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 2880
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                     36
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                        2028
<DEPRECIATION>                                1221
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                8186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         5824
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       385
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                     50
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  8186
<SALES>                                      10708
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             10708
<CGS>                                         5647
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                10184
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                524
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            524
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                   524
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .02


</TABLE>
#### DIAMOND FRUIT COMPANY and Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Doyle D. SMITH and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 38448.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 25, 1969.

A. Broaddus, Livingston, Tampa, of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, Orlando, for petitioners.

Clifton L. Howell, Jr., Winter Haven, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari, we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 24, 1969.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

*283Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7634

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

TIMOTHY F. BOOKER, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District 

Judge. (8:05-cr-00543-PJM-1; 8:07-cv-1782-PJM) 

Submitted: December 23, 2008 Decided: March 27, 2009 

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Timothy F. Booker, Appellant Pro Se. Steven M. Dunne, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Timothy F. Booker seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El 

v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th 

Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Booker has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 16.1

 
April 12, 1999



Office of the Chief Accountant
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Dear Sir/Madam:

We have read Item 9 included in the Form 10-K dated April 12, 1999 of Coaxial
Communications of Central Ohio, Inc., Phoenix Associates and Insight
Communications of Central Ohio, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and are in agreement with the statements contained therein.


Very truly yours,

/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



cc:  Mr. Daniel Mannino, Vice President and Controller
     Coaxial Communications of Central Ohio, Inc.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No.'s 333-778, 333-780, 333-782, 333-784, 333-786,
333-30057, 333-80977, 333-81069, 333-85859, 333-85853, 333-85855, 333-60986 and
333-98945) of US Oncology, Inc., formerly known as American Oncology Resources,
Inc. of our report dated February 27, 2003 appearing on page 50 of this Form
10-K.


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Houston, Texas
March 20, 2003
ex10-4.htm



Exhibit 10.4





 


[*] INDICATES CONFIDENTIAL PORTION HAS BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION






 


 



	 	T +1 410.531.4000 

 


W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn.


7500 Grace Drive


Columbia, MD 21044







 


September 21, 2015







Troy Rhonemus


Chief Operating Officer


ChromaDex, Inc.


10005 Muirlands Blvd.


Suite G


Irvine CA, 92618







Re:           Take or Pay Purchase Agreement for nicotinamide riboside chloride







Dear Mr. Rhonemus:







ChromaDex, Inc. (“ChromaDex”) currently purchases nicotinamide riboside chloride (the “Product”) from W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. (“Grace”) under terms agreed to by both ChromaDex and Grace. Notwithstanding any such terms, ChromaDex and Grace agree that the following purchase obligation and related terms shall apply, effective as of the date of this letter agreement:







ChromaDex shall purchase from Grace not less than [*] kg of Product (the “Required Amount”) between September 4, 2015 and December 31, 2015 at a price of $[*] per kg. In the event that ChromaDex does not purchase the full Required Amount by December 31, 2015, ChromaDex shall pay to Grace $[*] per kg for the difference, in kilograms, between the amount actually purchased by ChromaDex and the Required Amount.







Any payment by ChromaDex for a shortfall between the Required Amount and the amount of Product actually purchased is due by February 14, 2016.







Grace will ship the purchased Products to ChromaDex on a schedule to be agreed to by the parties.   Payment will be net 60 for any quantities of the Required Volume that ship after December 31, 2015.






  





  











  



[*] INDICATES CONFIDENTIAL PORTION HAS BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION








 


 


 


All other terms and conditions currently governing the purchase of the Product remain in full force and effect. In the event of any conflict or inconsistencies between the provisions in this letter agreement and those as currently agreed to by ChromaDex and Grace, the provisions in this letter agreement shall control.







This letter agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original of this letter agreement and all of which, when taken together, will be deemed to constitute one and the same letter agreement.







If you are in agreement with the foregoing, please have letter agreement signed by an authorized representative and return one fully executed original to:







Kathrine Kastberg


W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn.


7500 Grace Drive


Columbia, MD 21044







If there are any questions, please contact Audrey Kelleman at (858) 342-5367.








	  	 	  	 
	
CHROMADEX, INC.

	 	
W. R. GRACE & CO.-CONN.

	 
	  	 	  	 
	
By:

	
 


/s/ Troy Rhonemus

	 	
By:

	
 


/s/ Brett Reynolds

	 
	  	  	 	  	  	 
	
Name:

	
Troy Rhonemus

	 	
Name:

	
Brett Reynolds

	 
	  	  	 	  	  	 
	
Title:

	
COO

	 	
Title:

	
Business Director, Fine Chemicals

	 
	  	  	 	  	  	 
	
Date:

	
9/29/2015

	 	
Date:

	
9/22/2015