alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TELEPHONE CONTACT SUMMARY – 0210426.004.015 

FROM: Karen Schaffner, RTI International 

DATE OF CONTACT: May 20, 2010 

ORGANIZATION CONTACTED: 

Marathon Petroleum Company, LLC 

214 Center Street 

Clarksville, Indiana 47129 

PERSON CONTACTED: 

Benjamin Hoene; (812) 288-5571, ext. 103; bhoene@marathonoil.com

 

SUMMARY OF CONTACT:

Ms. Schaffner reviewed some remaining questions on applicability of 40 CFR part 63, 

subpart Y (NESHAP for Marine Vessel Loading Operations); emissions control devices 

for MVL; and whether submerged fill is conducted at the facility. She indicated that the 

permit showed 3.4 ton HAP emissions from MVL and that EPA’s 2005 NEI/NATA 

database showed 1.3 ton HAP for MVL in 2005. 

Mr. Hoene provided additional information on the facility, as summarized in the 

following two paragraphs. He indicated that the 1.3 ton HAP emissions for MVL in 2005 

are reasonable. There will be no HAP emissions for MVL for 2010 (see paragraph 

below). The facility is a synthetic minor, their older permits include loading throughput 

limits for limiting VOC and HAP, and overall facility emissions are well below 10/25 ton 

HAP level. The facility is not subject to 40 CFR part 63 subpart Y. There are no APCDs 

in place for MVL emissions. Barges loaded at the facility are equipped with submerged 

fill; from the header on the barge, there is a pipe almost to the bottom of the barge, a 90 

degree elbow bend and then the pipe runs horizontal to the bottom of the barge, 

approximately 1 ft from the bottom. 

The terminal has been idled since December 2009, meaning that most equipment at the 

site has been cleaned and is sitting unused; the dock itself is still in place however the 

barge loading equipment has been dismantled and removed. The facility still has its air 

permit, effective January 2008 through January 2018, however the site no longer has 

MVL equipment and will not conduct MVL operations in the future. The state air quality 

group at IDEM suggested the facility leave the permit in place for now. The area around 

the plant is on the river, and the town would like to make a riverwalk area. The plant is 

considering whether to sell the property but no decisions have been made.
sBnyoy opipyM [evoneN
a|}!89 puag ant]
##### 



PURPOSE OF THE PLAN
    ARTICLE TWO
   Bank
  
 1.
    
    John A. Pratt2.
    
    William L. Weil3.
    
    John N. Finnerty4.
    
    Vincent Grippo5.
    
    Vincent Palaia6.
    
    James J. Landy7.
    
    John DeGiorgio




---



##### 



Effective Date
 Base Annual Compensation
 to a maximum of 5% annually until the Normal Retirement Date
 Normal Retirement Date
 Equivalent- The Value
 a)
    
    Any Bank Contribution into the Qualified Plan Accountb)
    
    multiplied by the Interest Rate Offset.
 Bank Pension Plan Benefit
   ADMINISTRATION OF THE PLAN




---



##### 



POSTPONED RETIREMENT
     BENEFITS FORMULA
 Supplemental Retirement Benefit  Term
 Supplemental Retirement Benefit  Amount
 C. Transfer of Duties/Authorized Leave




---



##### 



ARTICLE SIX
  Voluntary Resignation
 Termination Without Cause
 Age at Termination
    
    No. of Years of Service
    
    Non-Forfeiture Benefit60 but less than 61
    
    10 or more
    
    50%61 but less than 62
    
    11 or more
    
    60%62 but less than 63
    
    12 or more
    
    70%63 but less than 64
    
    13 or more
    
    80%64 but less than 65
    
    14 or more
    
    90%
  Termination for Cause payments under this plan it shall come to the attention of the under this Plan




---



##### 



TOTAL DISABILITY
  Paragraph 5
   ARTICLE EIGHT
 Death Prior to Retirement
 Eligibility for Death Benefits Prior to Retirement
  Standard Premium from designated insurer
    $
    10,000Premium Offered by Insurer
    
    12,500Participants Annual Salary Reduction
    
    2,500




---



##### 



Death Benefit While Receiving Retirement Benefits
  DESIGNATION OF BENEFICIARY
   Restrictive Covenant
 shall not
accept employment or consultancy with any bank mortgage or
brokerage company or financial institution,




---



##### 



Insurance
   EEORGANIZATION




---



##### 



INCAPACITY OF RECIPIENT
   CLAIMS BY OTHERS
   ENCUMBRANCES




---



##### 



RELATION TO OTHER BENEFITS
  ARTICLE SEVENTEEN
 LUMP SUM PAYMENT OF BENEFITS
   
 ARTICLE EIGHTEEN




---



##### 



BINDING EFFECT
   GOVERNING LAW
   ARBITRATION
   SEVERABILITY
  HUDSON VALLEY BANKby_Chairman of the BoardATTEST:Secretary.
###### **Exhibit99.2**

 

## **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBINES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report of Phoenix Gold International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended September 29, 2002 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph K. O’Brien,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)               The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Joseph K. O’Brien |   |
|--------|----------------------------|--------|
|   | Joseph K. O’Brien     |
|   | Chief Financial Officer    |
|   | December 23, 2002          |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly Report of GL Energy and Exploration,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.     the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.


Dated:  November 15, 2004                    /s/ David Michery
                                             ------------------------------
                                             Name: David Michery
                                             Title: Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  November 15, 2004                    /s/ Kent Puckett
                                             ------------------------------
                                             Name: Kent Puckett
                                             Title: Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


 <ARTICLE>                                             5
 <MULTIPLIER>                                      1,000
        
 <S>                                                         <C>
 <PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    12-MOS
 <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             Dec-31-1997
 <PERIOD-START>                                                 Jan-1-1997
 <PERIOD-END>                                                  Dec-31-1997
 <CASH>                                                              2,516
 <SECURITIES>                                                            0
 <RECEIVABLES>                                                         667
 <ALLOWANCES>                                                            0
 <INVENTORY>                                                             0
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                        0
 <PP&E>                                                              2,228
 <DEPRECIATION>                                                     (1,291)
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      7,091
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               5,921
 <BONDS>                                                               943
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
 <PREFERRED>                                                            87
 <COMMON>                                                              140
 <OTHER-SE>                                                              0
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                        7,091
 <SALES>                                                             4,433
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    4,433
 <CGS>                                                                   0
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       7,152
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        0
 <LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    281
 <INCOME-PRETAX>                                                    (2,719)
 <INCOME-TAX>                                                          (13)
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                (2,732)
 <DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       930
 <CHANGES>                                                               0
 <NET-INCOME>                                                       (1,802)
 <EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       (0.12)
 <EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (0.12)
         
 
</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0253

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

KENT ALLEN TICHENOR,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 5, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 7 2021

12/07/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0253
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1669 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1669

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Isoeicosane.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 12, 2005

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Isoeicosane.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON ISOEICOSANE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.39.14      Isoeicosane (CAS    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         No. 93685-79-1)                                                    31/2009
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2710.19.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 9414.

#### The Cincinnati & Eastern Electric Railway Co. *v.*Mights.

(Decided May 8, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Mr. Frank F. Dinsmore,*for plaintiff in error.

*496
      *Mr. Echo. A. Hafner*and *Mr. Prescott Smith,*for defendant in error.

Judgment reversed. Grounds stated in journal ■entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of said circuit court be and the same hereby is revérsed for error in affirming the judgment of the court of common pleas and this court proceeding to render the judgment that said circuit court should have rendered, it is ordered and .adjudged that the judgment of said court of common pleas is reversed for error in overruling the motion for a new. trial on the ground that the court erred in its charge to the jury in submitting to the jury the question of punitive damages, for the reason that the evidence did not warrant the submission of that question to the jury and that the motion for a new trial be sustained, the verdict ■set aside and the cause be remanded to said court of ■common pleas for a new trial.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., •concur.
No. 9134.

#### The Findlay Brewing Company *v.*Emerich.

(Decided April 3, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Lucas county.

*Messrs. Shunck & Thompson,*for plaintiff in -error.

*Messrs. Kinney & Newton,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
No. 00-7220.

#### Souther *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 9290.

#### Yost et al. *v.*Gill.

(Decided April 17, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Gallia county.

*Mr. R. M. Switzer; Mr. T. E. Bradbury; Mr. R. A. Mack*and *Mr. R. J. Mauck,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Hollis G. Johnston,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 167 (Thursday, August 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22910]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. MG97-10-002]


Pacific Interstate Transmission Company; Notice of Filing

August 22, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 8, 1997, Pacific Interstate Transmission 
Company (PITCO) submitted a revised standards of conduct in response to 
the Commission's June 2, 1997 order.\1\ PITCO states that it has 
established an electronic bulletin board that it will post releases of 
capacity by other shippers to any PITCO marketing affiliate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 79 FERC para.61,287 (1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    PITCO states that copies of this filing have been mailed to all 
parties on the official service list compiled by the Secretary in this 
proceeding. Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing 
should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 or 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 or 385.214). All such motions to 
intervene or protest should be filed on or before September 8, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22910 Filed 8-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2250]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Public Information Collection Requirement

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Notice of emergency submission for approval of Information 
Collection #3038-0023--Regulations and Forms Relating to Registration 
with the Commission.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has submitted a 
request for emergency approval for information collection 3038-0023, 
Regulations and Forms Relating to Registration with the Commission. In 
compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Commission 
solicits comments to:

    (1) evaluate whether the collection of information is necessary 
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including 
the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (2) evaluate 
the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
collection of information including the validity of the methodology 
and assumptions used; (3) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity 
of the information to be collected; and (4) minimize the burden of 
the collection of the information on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, 
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic 
submission of responses.

ADDRESS: Copies of the submission may be obtained from the CFTC 
Clearance Officer, 1155 21st Street NW, Washington, DC 20581, (202) 
418-5160.

    Title: Regulations and Forms Relating to Registration with the 
Commission.
    Control Number: 3038-0023.
    Action: Extension.
    Respondents: Commission Registrants.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 27,467 hours.

    Issued in Washington, D.C. on January 24, 1997.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-2250 Filed 1-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7266

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHRIS PARKS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-99-30, CA-01-15-5)

Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 21, 2002

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chris Parks, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Gerald Nazzaro, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Chris Parks seeks to appeal the district court’s order

affirming and adopting in part the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation and denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

memorandum opinion and conclude for the reasons stated by the

district court that Parks has not made a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Parks, Nos.

CR-99-30; CA-01-15-5 (N.D.W. Va. July 15, 2002). Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We deny Park’s motion for appointment of

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medical Connections Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

3.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: May 15, 2009

| |     |                        
| | --- | -----------------------
| | By: | /s/ JOSEPH AZZATA      
| |     | JOSEPH AZZATA          
| |     | Chief Executive Officer
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45425]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22858]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

Advisory Committee Meeting; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice 
that published in the Federal Register of August 22, 1997 (62 FR 
44700). The notice announced a meeting of the General Hospital and 
Personal Use Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee, 
which is scheduled for September 15 and 16, 1997. The notice published 
with an error. This document corrects that error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LaJuana D. Caldwell, Office of Policy 
(HF-27), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857, 301-443-2994.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of August 22, 1997 
(62 FR 44700), in FR Doc. 97-22556, FDA announced that a meeting of the 
General Hospital and Personal Use Devices Panel of the Medical Devices 
Advisory Committee would be held on September 15 and 16, 1997. The 
notice incorrectly published the dates for submissions to the contact 
person as August 9, 1997. The correct date should be August 29, 1997.
    Beginning on page 44700, in column 3, under the ``Procedure:'' 
portion of the meeting, the date ``August 9, 1997'' should be corrected 
to read ``August 29, 1997'' both places that it appears.

    Dated: August 22, 1997.
Michael A. Friedman,
Deputy Commissioner for Operations.
[FR Doc. 97-22858 Filed 8-22-97; 4:20 pm]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
```
No. 00-7044.

#### Howland *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.