alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Attendee Report GoToWebinar

Webinar Name Webinar ID

ASRAC Commercial HVAC, CRE, and WH 

Working Group: Meeting and Webinar

651721056

Actual Start Date/Time Actual Duration (minutes) 

Aug 27, 2013 08:17 AM EDT 532

Total Attended

35

Session Details

First Name Last Name Email Country Address City State Organization Zip Code

Rodney Beever US 491 E. Princess St. York PA United CoolAir Corp. 17403

Alex Boesenberg US 1300 N 17th St #900 Rosslyn VA NEMA 22209

rob boteler US 2488 annapolis st charles MO nidec 63303

Tim Corcoran US 3933 us Rt 11 Cortland NY Intertek 13045

Pamela Costello US 918 O Street NW Washington DC Navigant 20001

Roger Daugherty US 6040 Ponders Court Greenville SC Baldor Electric/ABB 29615

Jim del Toro US Carrier parkway Syracuse NY Carrier Corp 13084

Jeremiah Freeman US DOE Washington DC New West Technologies 20585

Robert Glass US 12680 Lock 15 Road Tuscaloosa AL Raypak Inc. 35406

Marshall Hunt US 245 Market Street San Francisco CA PG&E 94177

John Hussey US 8050 West Florissant St. Louis MO Nidec Motor Company 63129

Diane Jakobs US 5600 Old Greenwood Road Fort Smith AR Rheem Heating and Cooling 72917

brian jeanes US 908 hwy 15 North New Albany MS Master-Bilt Products 38652

Dominic Kolandayan US 1645 Wallace Dr., Suite 110 Carrollton PA Daikin 75006

Scott Koons US Carrier Pkwy Syracuse NY UTC CCS 13221

Stephen Kowalski US 2701 Wilma Rudolph Blvd. Clarksville TN Ingersoll Rand - Trane North 

America

37040

Bill Larson US 727 second street Hudson WI Norlake, Inc. 54016

Jonathan Lemmond US 2111 Wilson Arlington VA AHRI 22201

Paul Lin US 1946 W. Cook Road Fort Wayne IN Regal Beloit Corporation 46818

steven maddox US 5005 york drive norman OK johnson controls 73069

John Malinowski US PO Box 2400 Fort Smith AR Baldor Electric Company / ABB 72902

John McLaughlin US 4900 Tech Blvd Auburn NY Daikin McKuay 13021

David Mecadon US 539 Dunksferry Road Bensalem PA National Refrigeration and Air 

Conditioning

19020

General Information
John Morris US 539 Dunksferry Rd Bensalem PA Continental Refrigerator 19020

Frank Myers US 3209 Galvez Ave Fort Worth TX PVI Industries, LLC 76111

David Peterson US PO Box 4729 Utica NY ECR International 13504

Michel Rivest US 1200 19th St NW Washington DC NCI 20016

wes roan US 1914 Randolph Dr. Bryan OH Bard Manufacturing Co., Inc. 43506

Steve Rosenstock US 701 Penn Ave NW Washington DC EEI 20004

Joe Sanders US 4401 Blue Mound Rd. Fort Worth TX Traulsen 76106

Stephen Schaefer US 618 Hwy 74 South Peachtree City GA Hoshizaki America 30269

Rusty Tharp US 5151 San Felipe Houston TX Goodman Manufacturing 77056

chris thompson US 2145 West park place blvd Stone Mountain GA Heatcraft 30087

Eric Truskoski US 200 Lafayette St. Middleville MI Bradford White Corporation 49333

kevin washington US 1250 conn ave nw washington DC ITW 20036
# Center Restaurant hosts soft opening, feeds the masses

/ Published July 24, 2018
Richmond, Va. , 
Defense Logistics Agency Installation Operations Richmond’s Morale, Welfare and Recreation Office hosted a soft opening of the new Center Restaurant July 23.

Employees turned out in droves to see the new Center Restaurant in the DLA Aviation Operations Center and to taste free small bite samplings. 

“Food vendors from U.S. Foods were available with samples,” said Nelson Mayes, food and beverage business manager, MWR office, DLA Installation Operations Richmond.“MWR provided a free potato and nacho bar, full salad bar, grilled hamburgers, cake and refreshments.”

The restaurant opened full time July 24. Its operating hours will be from 7 a.m. – 1 p.m.The Tickets and More Office has also relocated inside the new restaurant and is open from 8 a.m. - 3:30 p.m. 

Opening shortly will be the new Centre Perk, coffee shop.

Ursula Hickox, MWR chief, said there are a few more equipment issues to work out and inspections to complete before the coffee shop opens, but hopefully it will be by the end of the week. 

“It’s great to see the new cafeteria space become operational,” said David Gibson, site director, DLA Installation Operations Richmond. “Everyone worked hard on the transition.The new space enables us to provide more options and improved service.”
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 157 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit interest on Federally 

guaranteed water, wastewater, and essential community facilities loans 

to be tax exempt. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25, 2005 

Mr. KOHL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 

interest on Federally guaranteed water, wastewater, and 

essential community facilities loans to be tax exempt.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TAX-EXEMPT INTEREST ON FEDERALLY GUAR4 ANTEED WATER, WASTEWATER, AND FEDER5 ALLY GUARANTEED ESSENTIAL COMMUNITY 

6 FACILITIES LOANS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 149(b)(3)(A) of the Inter8 nal Revenue Code 1986 (relating to certain insurance pro9 grams) is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause 
2

•S 157 IS

1 (ii), by striking period at the end of clause (iii) and insert2 ing ‘‘, or’’, and by adding at the end the following new 

3 clause: 

4 ‘‘(iv) any guarantee by the Secretary 

5 of Agriculture pursuant to section 

6 306(a)(1) of the Consolidated Farm and 

7 Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 

8 1926(a)(1)) to finance water, wastewater, 

9 and essential community facilities.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to bonds issued after the date of 

12 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
# 916th Airmen Equipped to Innovate

/ Published Oct. 22, 2018
SEYMOUR JOHNSON AIR FORCE BASE, *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the 916th Air Refueling Wing website.*
# DLA Distribution Center Yokosuka, Japan Welcomes SOLE

/ Published June 26, 2018
YOKOSUKA, Japan, 
One of the most unique opportunities leadership in DLA Distribution Centers positioned outside the United States have is the sharing of logistics’ concepts through multi-national, Key Leadership Engagements.  One such engagement for DLA Distribution Yokosuka, Japan was with the Japan Chapter of the International Society of Logistics or SOLE, on May 25, 2018.  A total of 26 members of the Society visited DLA Distribution Yokosuka, Japan to learn and observe the operation and to exchange views and thoughts as professional logisticians.

SOLE is a non-profit international professional society composed of individuals organized to enhance the art and science of logistics technology, education and management. SOLE has a presence in more than 50 countries throughout the world.  It has also partnered with the U.S. Army’s Logistics University to provide qualification standards for the Army’s Demonstrated Logistician (DemLog) Program.  Designations are based upon logistics experience, formal civilian education and military training.

Japan Chapter SOLE members are made up of Japan Military Self-Defense Force officers and officials, Japan Defense Academy professors, official institute fellows, researchers, university professors and commercial company CEOs.

Roy Jewell, deputy commander of DLA Distribution Yokosuka, Japan, who is also an Army DemLog Demonstrated Master Logistician, welcomed the members and provided them with a command brief.  Senior Japanese civilian personnel from Yokosuka’s Receiving section, Packing & Preservation section, Freight Terminal section and Storage section highlighted the center’s core operations during the facility tour.

SOLE members observed operation, while leadership explained how superior storage and distribution solutions are provided through the strength of Yokosuka’s diversified workforce, and an uncompromising focus on safety, to all U.S. Department of Defense services in the Pacific, as well as supporting Japanese allies through the Foreign Military Sales program.

The tour encompassed a walk through one of Yokosuka’s historical buildings, Building J-39, which used to house The Imperial Japanese Navy submarines during World War II.  This building served as one of the main building on Yokosuka Naval Base, formerly knows as Yokosuka Naval Arsenal, when the Japanese Navy operated the base through August, 1945. 

DLA Distribution Yokosuka personnel and Japan Chapter, SOLE members interacted with each other and built a positive relationship by asking and answering questions. The experience enhanced knowledge and understanding as professional logisticians and added another valuable asset and link for Yokosuka’s leadership’s professional development.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1726 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

324 Main Street in Grambling, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Coach Eddie Robinson 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 324 Main Street in Grambling, Louisiana, 

as the ‘‘Coach Eddie Robinson Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COACH EDDIE ROBINSON POST OFFICE BUILD4 ING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 324 Main Street in Grambling, 

7 Louisiana, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Coach 

8 Eddie Robinson Post Office Building’’. 
2 

•S 1726 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Coach Eddie Robinson 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Edgar Luce, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ellie Mae,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a15(e) and 15d15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Edgar Luce                                       
|Edgar Luce Chief Financial
Officer Date: May 13, 2011
# L_2023074EN.01000301.xml

| 13.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 74/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 74/3

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/563

of 6 March 2023

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Íslenskt lambakjöt’ (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Iceland’s application to register the name ‘Íslenskt lambakjöt’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Iceland’s application to register the name ‘Íslenskt lambakjöt’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Íslenskt lambakjöt’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Íslenskt lambakjöt’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Íslenskt lambakjöt’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.1. Fresh meat (and offal), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 March 2023.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 370, 28.9.2022, p. 45.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2)  | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Meridian      Interstate Bancorp as of and for the period covered by the      Report. |
|--|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  August      13, 2008 | /s/      Richard J. Gavegnano              |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                   | Richard      J. Gavegnano                  |
|                                   | Chairman      and Chief Executive Officer  |
|                                   |                                       |
|                                   |                                       |
|                                   |                                       |
|                                   |                                       |
| Dated:  August      13, 2008 | /s/      Leonard V. Siuda                  |
|                                   | Leonard      V. Siuda                      |
|                                   | Chief      Financial Officer and Treasurer |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22-0344 

# FILED MAR 07 2r.. , 23 Bowen Greenwc Glen ,: of Supreme Court State of Montana IN THE MAIIER OF: A.R., ORDER A Youth in Need ofCare.

Counsel for the appellant father ofA.R. filed a motion and briefaskingto beallowed to withdraw from this appeal on grounds that counsel has been unable to find any nonfrivolous issues to raise on appeal, pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA, and Anders v. Califbrnia, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). The father was granted time to file a response. Although the father did not file a response with this Court, the Office of the Attomey General has forwarded to this Court an unsigned, unserved document that it received that purports to be from the father. The State's Notice of Filing, along with the document it received, has been filed by the Clerk. The Court has now independently examined the record pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA, and Anders. We conclude there are no arguments with potential legal merit that could be raised in the father's appeal in this case. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord and to the appellant father personally. DATED this /- day ofMarch, 2023.

ChiefJustice 03/07/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0344

# vkNi



# (94AI 41
. 1.,

t?"
k eGe., Justices

2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 22, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-51003

Conference Calendar

 

TERRELL RAY BARNES,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

W. SISNEROS, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-02-CV-509-JN 

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Terrell Ray Barnes, federal prisoner # 72543-079, appeals

the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition.

Barnes is currently serving a 240-month sentence for conspiracy

to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and aiding and

abetting in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846 and 18 U.S.C. § 2. 

Barnes argues that the district court erred in determining that
No. 02-51003

-2-

he had not shown that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 did not provide an

“inadequate” and “ineffective” postconviction remedy. 

Barnes has failed to show that he is entitled to proceed

under the “savings clause” of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See ReyesRequena v. United States, 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001) (to

proceed under “savings clause,” a petitioner must show that

(1) his claims are based on a retroactively applicable Supreme

Court decision which establishes that he may have been convicted

of a nonexistent offense, and (2) his claims were foreclosed by

circuit law at the time when the claims should have been raised

in his trial, appeal, or first 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion). Barnes

relies on inapposite case law and cannot demonstrate that he was

convicted of a “non-existent” offense. This court has rejected

Barnes’s argument that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466

(2000), applies retroactively to cases on collateral review under

Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989). See United States v. Brown,

305 F.3d 304, 310 (5th Cir. 2002), petition for cert. filed,

(U.S. Feb. 3, 2003)(No. 02-9606). Accordingly, the judgment

of the district court is AFFIRMED.
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 ( 321 )

- 261

- 2547

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgrou p.com July 14, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Bldg. 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

RE: Summary Grant for HighCastle Systems, LLC Exemption Request Under

Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and

Reform Act of 2012 , 4 9 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or M adam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA)

, 49

U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, HighCastle Systems, L LC. ( HighCastle

Systems, ), an aerial video and photography service company and operator of small

Unmanned Aircraft System s ( s UAS), seeks an exemption from the following listed Code

of Federal Regulations (CFR) to allow commercial operation of the DJI Phantom 3

Professional within the National Airspace System (NAS) for controlled, low

- risk, aerial

video and photography of Real Estate Properties (for homeowners, realtors, home

builders, home contractors and / or h ome inspectors for real estate marketing and

inspection of home exteriors) as well as filming of special events

.

HighCastle Systems, in the accompanying petition, seeks exemption from the

requirements of 14 C.F.R. §§ 45.27(a), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.105, 91.119(c),

91.121

, 91.151(b)

, 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and ( 2 ),and 91.417(a) and (b)

.

HighCastle Systems has requested that the FAA not request public comment on its

petition because it would not set a ny precedent and because the relief requested is

identical to numerous exemptions granted previously. 14 C.F.R. § 11.87.

In addition, HighCastle Systems will be utilizing the s ame DJI proven technologies the

FAA has already accepted and approved for numerous other Section 333 exemptions.

All of the appropriate documentation to accompany HighCastle Systems Sec tion 333

Petition is included. Combined, th eir comp rehensive Section 333 Exemption and the

approvals the FAA has already given to DJI products and th e technology, should provide

the support necessary to the FAA for a S ummary G rant of HighCastle System’s SectionUASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 ( 321 )

- 261

- 2547

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgrou p.com 333 Petition and expedite the process.

Kelly J. Neubecker

CEO

UASolutions Group, Inc.

CC:

Bill Crozier

Jo e Morra

Jake Troutman

Dean Griffith, Esq.

Robert Papas