alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Hancy, Cindy Wang [ mailto:chancy@rti.org ]

Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 11:38 AM

To: Davis, Carlos E.

Subject: EPA

- ICR response

Carlos,

I’m with RTI and I am assisting Susan Fairchild with the Wool Fiberglass NESHAP. I was reviewing

Certainteed’s confidential responses to the last ICR and I wanted to confirm that the chromium

percentages listed for the different sections of the furnaces refer to percentages of Cr2O3. Most

fac ilities listed the percentages as % Cr2O3, but CertainTeed just listed a percentage without specifying

what the percentage was referring to. Could you please confirm/elaborate on this?

Thanks,

Cindy Wang Hancy

RTI International

P.O. Box 12194

Research T riangle Park, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541

- 6623

Fax: (919) 316

- 3420
!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

Beec

Nottely River

U.S. Forest Service

£¤64

£¤19

£¤19

£¤64

UV60

18

18

17

16

16

!(16

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

Beec

Nottely River

U.S. Forest Service

£¤64

£¤19

£¤19

£¤64

UV60

18

18

17

16

16

16

\\alismurphy\home\mprlm\projects\landplan\maps\Hiwassee_land_plan\Hiwassee_land_plan_for_Web.mxd

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000

Feet /

Hiwassee Reservoir

Land Management Plan Jul 24, 2008

Tile: C3
# DLA employees recognized by packaging community 

/ Published Aug. 15, 2017

Two Defense Logistics Agency employees recently received awards from the National Institute of Packaging, Handling and Logistics Engineers for their contributions to the packaging community.

Jennifer Smith, who works in the Technical and Quality Division in DLA Logistics Operations, received the Packaging Achievement Award. Eric Carter, who is on rotation with the TQ Division, received the Logistics Achievement Award. Carter will return to DLA Distribution when his rotation ends.

“Jennifer and Eric are ideal employees who possess the work ethic, leadership traits and technical skills required by our agency to achieve the goals of today and tomorrow,” said Patricia Wilkins, chief of the Technical Programs Branch in DLA Logistics Operations.

Smith’s efforts to revise several packaging processes streamlined procedures, automated manual processes, reduced workload and provided estimated annual savings of $3.6 million annually. Carter made improvements in de-packing and handling electrostatic discharge materials that are transported to several distribution centers. Those improvements will save $2 million and thousands of hours of unproductive work, as well as enhance safety for those handling the materials.

NIPHLE describes itself as a professional organization focused on distribution and logistics.
No. 00-7116.

#### Brown *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
**China: Livestock Statistics (90014)**
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  3.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and4.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 Date: March 29, 2006
    /s/  Quock Q. FongName:
    Quock Q. FongTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
#### Cynthia Doris JONES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 77-1862, 78-160.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 5, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Steven R. Jacob, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL and NATHAN, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Cynthia Doris Jones appeals from an order revoking probation with consequent adjudication of guilt and sentence on the original conviction, or imprisonment for a term of 5 years, and also appeals from a judgment holding her in contempt of court, for which no separate sentence was imposed.

We hold the revocation of probation order was improper because of procedural deficiencies. The record shows that when the application for revocation came on for hearing the defendant was not present and the matter was not then heard, and the affidavit submitted as the basis for the revocation was dismissed. When the matter again came on for hearing, that affidavit was not refiled, and no new or *158other affidavit was filed. Also, due apparently to the serious distraction created by highly improper and foul language of the defendant in the presence of the court, for which the defendant was adjudged in contempt, the revocation was entered without the required trial or hearing on the merits thereof.

The order revoking probation and the adjudication of guilt and sentence of imprisonment are reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings thereon. On the appeal from the judgment of contempt, that judgment is affirmed and the cause remanded for imposition of sentence thereon.

It is so ordered.
Exhibit 10-J-4

FIRST AMENDMENT TO HARTMARX CORPORATION

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

This First Amendment to the Hartmarx Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (the Plan) is made effective as of this 26th day of November
2007.

WHEREAS, the Plan was adopted and became effective as of January 1, 2002; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of Article VII, the Plan may be terminated or amended at any time and for any reason, including but not limited to
changes in tax law and regulations; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 the Internal Revenue Code was amended
by adding Section 409A thereto, which significantly and materially amended the tax laws and tax treatment accorded to deferred compensation; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to final regulations issued by the Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, including but not limited to additional notices issued by the Internal Revenue Service providing transitional
guidance with respect to Section 409A, the Plan may be amended to provide for new payment elections with respect to both the time and form of payment and in certain circumstances such amendment will not be treated as a change in the time and
form of payment under Section 409A(a)(4) or an acceleration of payment under Section 409A(a)(3).

NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is
hereby amended as follows:



| | 1. | New Section 4.13 is added to Article IV, to provide as follows:
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------

4.13 Section 409A Amendment. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Plan or in any deferral election or form of Benefit Payment under the Plan, each Participants Deferred
Benefit Account shall be paid to a Participant in the manner set forth in such Participants Distribution Election Form delivered to the Company by not later than December 17, 2007. In the event that a Participant has not returned a signed
Distribution Election Form by said date, the Participants Deferred Benefit Account shall be paid in a lump sum as soon as is administratively practicable following the Determination Date which falls on August 31, 2008. To the extent
required by law, the Company shall withhold any and all taxes required to be withheld pursuant to federal, state and local tax laws and regulations. Upon the last payment to Participants pursuant to this Section 4.13, the Plan shall thereupon
terminate.



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has adopted this First Amendment as of the day and date
first above written.



HARTMARX CORPORATION/s/ TARAS R. PROCZKOTaras R. Proczko, Senior Vice President and Member,
Hartmarx Corporation Plan Administration Committee
No. 9084.

#### Boyle *v.*Boyle et al.

(Decided March 20, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Lucas county.

*Messrs. Paddock, Johnson & Roivley,*for plaintiff in error, and for Bridget, Walter and Joseph Boyle, defendants in error.

*Mr. N. O. Winter*and *Mr. Charles E. Chittenden,*for Mary Dawley, defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
**Cropping Practices (93018)**
# DLA Distribution cuts ribbon on new facility in Iwakuni

/ Published May 22, 2017
IWAKUNI, Japan, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution cut the ribbon on its newest facility during a ceremony with logistics partners and customers May 15.  
Located in Iwakuni, Japan, the site was the result of a two-year collaboration between the U.S. Marine Corps and the U.S. Navy, U.S. Forces Japan, and United States Pacific Command and based on a requirement resulting from the growth of the U.S. forces at Iwakuni.

The new location aims to decrease customer wait times for critical material by pre-positioning it on site, reducing investment and transportation costs to the services, and increasing readiness for troops in the Area of Responsibility.  

“This distribution center, like the others in our global distribution network, has been established to ensure that our customers have the right things, at the right place, at the right time,” DLA Distribution Commanding General Army Brig. Gen. John Laskodi told the audience. “It also represents an enduring commitment by the US Department of Defense, to strengthen our military logistics posture in the Pacific...the logistics which support our operational and tactical forces across all domains.”

Cutting the ribbon alongside Laskodi were Navy Cmdr. Nolasco Villanueva, commander, DLA Distribution Yokosuka, Japan; Marine Corps Col. Richard Fuerst, commander, Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni; Navy Capt. Tim Daniels, commander, DLA Pacific; and Thelmo Santos, site director, DLA Distribution Iwakuni.
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of PCS Edventures!.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
We, Anthony A. Maher, President and Christina M. Vaughn, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: 11/14/2005                         /s/Anthony A. Maher
     -----------                         ---------------------
                                         Anthony A. Maher
                                         President and director


Date: 11/14/2005                         /s/Christina M. Vaughn
     -----------                         ---------------------
                                         Christina M. Vaughn
                                         Chief Financial Officer and director
#### Keith F. ISAACS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-897.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 25, 1977.

*360Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Frank B. Kessler, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Anthony J. Golden, Robert L. Bogen, Asst. Attys. Gen., and Charles A. Stampelos, Legal Intern, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

DOWNEY, Judge.

Only one of the three points appellant poses for our consideration has merit. In that point appellant contends that the order, under review, which placed him on probation for a period of seven years, is not authorized by law. Since the offense to which appellant entered his negotiated plea was a third degree felony breaking and entering, the maximum probationary period allowable by law is five years. See, e. g., *Holmes v. State,*343 So.2d 632 (Fla.4th DCA 1977).

Although it has no merit, the point which concerns several conditions of probation imposed by the trial court warrants discussion. Appellant contends that the following conditions are unreasonable: a) appellant must have no contact with Bruce Arnold, Michael Smith, Billy Arnold, or Howard Isaacs (appellant’s brother); b) the court retains custody over the person of the appellant and authorizes any probation supervisor and any law enforcement officer to search, at any time, the appellant and all vehicles and premises concerning which he has legal standing to give consent to the search; and c) appellant must submit to physical or chemical examinations upon the request of any probation supervisor or law enforcement officer to determine systemic presence of controlled substances or unlawfully acquired drugs. We reject appellant’s contention and approve those conditions of probation. *Steve v. Heath,*343 So.2d 13 (Fla.1977); *Pace v. State,*350 So.2d 1075 (Fla.4th DCA 1977), Case No. 76-2010.

For the foregoing reasons the order under review is modified to reflect a probationary period of five years; in all other respects it is affirmed.

AFFIRMED as modified.

LETTS, J., concurs.

DAUKSCH, J., dissents, with opinion.

DAUKSCH, Judge,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent.

As I predicted in *Pace v. State,*350 So.2d 1075 (Fla.4th DCA, Case No. 76-2210, Opinion filed June 24, 1977, see also dissent upon denial of rehearing, Opinion filed October 11, 1977), a very insidious, to me, trend was developing. Under *Pace,*supra, the probationer was required to submit to search, with or without probable cause or even suspicion, by any law enforcement officer at any time.

Now the standard is that the probationer must submit himself *or herself*to physical or chemical examination at anytime by any law enforcement officer.

I feel it unnecessary to reiterate but reaffirm my convictions stated in *Pace,*supra.
No. 9509.

#### Morgan et al. *v.*Wakelin et al.

(Decided February 27, 1906.)

Error to’ Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Mr. E. Sowers,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Blandin, Bice £ Ginn,*for defendants in ■error.

Judgment affirmed.

.Shattck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
FREDERICK M. JONES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-76

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 18, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Terry P. Lewis, Judge.

Melissa J. Ford, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil 

Regional Counsel, Region One, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General; Virginia Harris and Kaitlin Weiss, Assistant 

Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
| • | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| • | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 16, 2011  |   | /s/ Michael Grendi          |   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|--------|
|                     |   | Michael Grendi              |   |   |
|                     |   | Principal Financial Officer |   |   |

----
#### CITY OF MIAMI, a Municipal corporation, Appellant, v. Robert ISMAY, Appellee.

No. 69-297.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Aug. 26, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

________________ _________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. FANICE ANDREA REED, a/k/a Fanice Jones, Defendant - Appellant. No. 22-1008 (D.C. No. 1:21-CR -00142-CMA-1) (D. Colo.)

________________ _________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

________________ _________________ Before BACHARACH , KELLY , and ROSSMAN , Circuit Judges.

________________ _________________ Fanice Andrea Reed pleaded guilty to theft or conversion of government property in violation of 18 U. S.C. § 641. She was sentenced to serve 27 months in prison. Although her plea agre ement contained a waiver of her appellate rights, she filed a notice of appeal. Th e government has moved to en force the appeal waiver in the plea agreement pursuant to United States v. Hahn , 359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam).

* This order and judgment is not bi nding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judica ta, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consiste nt with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### August 10, 2022 Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court Appellate Case: 22-1008 Document: 010110722758 Date Filed: 08/10/2022 Page: 12 Under Hahn , we consider “(1) whether the di sputed appeal falls within the scope of the waiver of appellate rights; (2) whether the defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived [her] appellate rights; and (3) whether enforcing the waiver would result in a misca rriage of justice.” Id. at 1325. The government asserts that all of the Hahn conditions have been satisfied. Appellate counsel for Ms. Reed file d a response and motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967) , conceding “that any appeal [including any opposition to the Motion to Enforce] would be wholly frivolous.” Resp. at 1 (inter nal quotation marks omitted). Ms. Reed has also filed a brief pro se response in which she expres ses dissatisfaction w ith trial counsel’s representation, but acknowledges that “t o move forward” with an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, “[ she] would need to file a [28 U.S.C. §] 2255 [motion]” in district court. Pro Se Resp. at 1. She does not offe r any arguments in response to the government’s motion to enforce or othe rwise challenge her appellate counsel’s determination that any opposition to the motion to enforce would be frivolous. Based on counsel’s and Ms. Reed’s conce ssions and our indepe ndent review of the record, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, grant the government’s motion to enforce the appeal waiver, a nd dismiss the appeal. This dismissal does not affect Ms. Reed’s right to pursue post-conviction relief on the grounds permitted in her plea agreement.

Entered for the Court Per Curiam Appellate Case: 22-1008 Document: 010110722758 Date Filed: 08/10/2022 Page: 2
#### Felton AVANT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-1250.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 12, 1978.

Felton Avant, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed.
**Referendum CVM Programs (93010)-  access.wp5atog.wp5atog386.exebivariat.docbivariat.gcgbivariat.wp5cfig386.execfig4win.batcvm.doccvm.gcgcvmboot.fstcvmboxco.fstcvmdblog.fstcvmdweab.fstcvmexit.fstcvmhelp.fstcvmjack.fstcvmlogit.fstcvmnonpa.fstcvmoutpu.fstcvmtitle.fstcvmweibi.fstdoubleb.prndweabdat.prndweabsa1.docdweabsa1.gcgdweabsa1.wp5gsruni.cfggsruni.exegsruni.ovrinstall.batlogitex.prnread.meread.rtirunini.docsimdb.datsimdb.dhtsimdb.prnstartrun.gcgvmruni.bat

**
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

I, Michel Poignant, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Crystal Finance Holding Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed the attached report on Form 10-QSB.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluations; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.


Date: August 24, 2006

/s/ Michel Poignant
-------------------
President and Director and
Chief Financial Officer
Principal Accounting Officer