alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA Distribution Red River breaks ground on new general purpose warehouse 

/ Published April 24, 2018
TEXARKANA, Texas, 
DLA Distribution Red River, Texas broke ground on a new 240,000 square foot general purpose warehouse in a ceremony on Thursday, April 19.   

According to keynote speaker United States Army Brig. Gen. John S. Laskodi, commanding general, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, New Cumberland, Pennsylvania, “The construction of this new warehouse represents DLA Distribution’s dedication to the warfighter, providing increased storage capacity to deliver the right things... at the right place... at the right time.” 

In an effort to maintain assured logistics, financial and process excellence, while also sustaining audit readiness, Red River’s new general purpose warehouse will have 26-foot stacking height, weather-sealed truck doors and loading/unloading docks with dock levelers. Additionally, it will offer 3,000 square feet of administrative area, locker rooms, employee lunch and break room and a utility annex. All administrative areas will comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and anti-terrorism force protection standards. DLA Distribution Red River, Texas, receives, stores and distributes Class VII major end items to support both Red River Army Depot Manufacturing and provide worldwide military readiness. The Army has designated DLA Distribution Red River, Texas, as the storage site for its Bradley Fighting Vehicle Systems, Multiple Launch Rocket Systems, High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems and the High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicles along with over 450 different models of both wheeled and tracked vehicles.  In support of these systems, the distribution center builds and maintains a supply of basic issue items and components that accompany wheeled and tracked vehicles shipped to units in the field. These kits include such things as wrenches, vehicle jacks, tie-down ropes or cables, and other items needed to perform minor maintenance in the field.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45405-45406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22778]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3975-000]

Cinergy Services, Inc.; Notice of Filing

August 21, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 25, 1997, Cinergy Services, Inc. (Cinergy) 
tendered for filing a service agreement under Cinergy's Open Access 
Transmission Service Tariff entered into between Cinergy and Carolina 
Power & Light Company (CP&L).
    Cinergy and CP&L are requesting an effective date of July 1, 1997.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211

[[Page 45406]]

and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
285.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or protests should be 
filed on or before September 2, 1997. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22778 Filed 8-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
PRIVATE LAW 106–12—NOV. 9, 2000

Private Law 106–12

106th Congress

An Act

For the relief of Luis A. Leon-Molina, Ligia Padron, Juan Leon Padron, Rendy

Leon Padron, Manuel Leon Padron, and Luis Leon Padron.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law,

for purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

1101 et seq.), Luis A. Leon-Molina, Ligia Padron, Juan Leon Padron,

Rendy Leon Padron, Manuel Leon Padron, and Luis Leon Padron

shall each be held and considered to have been selected for a

diversity immigrant visa for fiscal year 2001 as of the date of

the enactment of this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.

(b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Luis A. Leon-Molina, Ligia

Padron, Juan Leon Padron, Rendy Leon Padron, Manuel Leon

Padron, or Luis Leon Padron enters the United States before the

date of the enactment of this Act, he or she shall be considered

to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise

eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245

of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

Upon the granting of permanent residence to Luis A. LeonMolina, Ligia Padron, Juan Leon Padron, Rendy Leon Padron,

Manuel Leon Padron, and Luis Leon Padron as provided in this

Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to

reduce by six during the current fiscal year the total number

of immigrant visas available to natives of the country of the aliens’

birth under section 203(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act

(8 U.S.C. 1153(c)).

Approved November 9, 2000.

Nov. 9, 2000

[H.R. 3414]
# January is National Mentoring Month

/ Published Jan. 1, 2018
COLUMBUS, Ohio, At DLA Land and Maritime, there’s an active mentoring program within the workforce and the community.
Mentoring is a personal enhancement strategy through which one person facilitates the development of another by sharing known resources, expertise, values, skills, perspectives, attitudes, and proficiencies. It allows the learner to build skills and knowledge while attaining goals for career development.

## DLA Land and Maritime Mentoring Program

**Level I – Professional Self-Development**
      - Below GS/WG-9 Grade Levels 
      - Voluntary 
      - 1-year commitment 
      - Self-Development 
      - Career Development Plan 
      - Situational Mentoring 
      - For more information, call 614-692-4655 or **email Level l**. 

**Level II – Mentoring Program for Leaders**
      - GS-9 through 12 (or equivalent) 
      - Voluntary 
      - 9-month commitment 
      - Leadership Competency Development 
      - Mentoring Action Plan (MAP) 
      - Mentoring Agreement 
      - For more information, call 614-692-2537 or **email Level ll**. 

**Level III – Advanced Mentoring Program for Leaders**
      - GS-13 & 14s 
      - Competitive 
      - 2-year commitment 
      - Leadership Competency Development 
      - Mentoring Action Plan (MAP)
      - For more information, call 614-692-2537 or **email Level lll.**
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00416

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.H. , A.H., and A.H., Children

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- PA

- 00033

Honorable Brenda Chapman, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order of termination is

AFFIRMED.

We order that no costs be assessed against appellant Mother or appella nt Father as both are

indigent.

SIGNED November 25, 2015.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
WRP gives supervisors pool of qualified candidates to fill workforce gaps, build stronger teams
 
  By Beth Reece
                                                      Managers and supervisors at DLA Aviation can learn more about the WRP during information sessions scheduled for Feb. 22 and April 8 and at Disposition Services Feb. 28. A video about the DLA WRP is available here. For more information, contact WRP@dla.mil.
<Page>

                                                              EXHIBIT 99.01


                                 NeoPharm, Inc.
                           150 Field Drive, Suite 195
                              Lake Forest, IL 60045




April 1, 2002



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 5th Street NW
Washington, DC  20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Release Nos. 33-8070; 34-45590;
35-27503; 39-2395; IA-2018; IC-25464; FR-62; File No. S7-03-02, this letter is
to confirm that NeoPharm, Inc. has received assurance from its independent
public accountants, Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen"), that Andersen's audit of
our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2001 and for the year
then ended (the "Audit") was subject to Andersen's quality control system for
the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that
the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, that
there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the Audit,
availability of national office consultation, and availability of personnel at
foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the Audit.

NeoPharm, Inc.

/s/ Lawrence A. Kenyon

Lawrence A. Kenyon
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1613 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1613

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act of 1999 to extend the 
            termination date for mandatory price reporting.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF MANDATORY PRICE REPORTING.

    Section 942 of the Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act of 1999 
(Public Law 106-78; 7 U.S.C. 1635 note) is amended by striking 
``September 30, 2005'' and inserting ``September 30, 2006''.

            Passed the Senate September 13, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1613

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act of 1999 to extend the 
            termination date for mandatory price reporting.
```
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed August 9, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-16-00613-CV

IN RE WILLIARD CAPITAL CORP., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

215th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-21165

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 2, 2016, relator Williard Capital Corp. filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. 

P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Elaine H. 

Palmer, presiding judge of the 215th District Court of Harris County, to vacate the 

Amended Temporary Injunction she signed on July 25, 2016.
2

Relator also filed a motion for emergency stay of the Amended Temporary 

Injunction.

To obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court 

clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate remedy by appeal. In 

re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

Mandamus may not be used as a form of interlocutory appeal. N.H. Helicopters, 

Inc. v. Brown, 841 S.W.2d 424, 425 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1992, orig. proceeding). 

Section 51.014(a)(4) of the Civil Practices and Remedies Code specifically 

provides for an interlocutory appeal from an order granting a temporary injunction. 

Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(4). An interlocutory appeal 

provides an adequate remedy. See In re Henry, 274 S.W.3d 185, 189 n. 2 (Tex.

App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2008, orig. proceeding); In re Sewell, 14-12-00044-CV, 

2012 WL 254004, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 26, 2012, orig. 

proceeding) (per curiam). 

Because relator may appeal the temporary injunction as provided for by 

section 51.014(a)(4), it has an adequate remedy by appeal, and has not established 

its entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus. Accordingly, we 

deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and also deny relator’s related motion 

for emergency stay.

 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jamison, McCally, and Wise.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1675 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,3-Dichloronitrobenzene. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,3- 

Dichloronitrobenzene. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 2,3- 

4 DICHLORONITROBENZENE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.39.14 2,3-Dichloronitrobenzene 

(CAS No. 3209–22–1) (provided for in subheading 

2904.90.47) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 
2 

•S 1675 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
ARS Home

----

						Project Team			
-  **Lillehoj, Hyun** 
						Project Annual Reports			
-  									2012						 
-  									2011						 
-  									2010						 
-  									2009						 
-  									2008						 
						Related National Programs			
-  									Animal Health (103)						 

*Invalid project*
# C_2023345EN.01000601.xml

| 29.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 345/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 345/6

---

Corrigendum to Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – European Banking Authority (EBA)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 73 of 28 February 2023
  )

(2023/C 345/02)

On page 71, ‘Expenditure’, Chapter 3 1:

for:

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | Appropriations 2023 | Appropriations 2022 | Outturn 2021 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘3 | OPERATING EXPENDITURES | | | |
| 3 1 | GENERAL OPERATIONAL COSTS: SEMINARS FOR NSA, MEETINGS, MISSIONS, CONSULTATION SERVICES AND PUBLICATION | 2 914 172 | 3 041 707 | 3 712 230 ,— |
| ... | | | | |
| | Title 3 — Total | 6 841 911 | 7 602 137 | 9 515 059 ,— |
| ... | | | | |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 52 677 014 | 50 315 014 | 52 877 198 ,—’ |

Title

Chapter

Heading

Appropriations 2023

Appropriations 2022

Outturn 2021

‘3

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

3 1

GENERAL OPERATIONAL COSTS: SEMINARS FOR NSA, MEETINGS, MISSIONS, CONSULTATION SERVICES AND PUBLICATION

2 914 172

3 041 707

3 712 230 ,—

...

Title 3 — Total

6 841 911

7 602 137

9 515 059 ,—

...

GRAND TOTAL

52 677 014

50 315 014

52 877 198 ,—’

read:

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | 2023 appropriations | 2022 appropriations | 2021 out-turn |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘3 | OPERATING EXPENDITURES | | | |
| 3 1 | GENERAL OPERATIONAL COSTS: SEMINARS FOR NSA, MEETINGS, MISSIONS, CONSULTATION SERVICES AND PUBLICATION | 2 914 712 | 3 041 707 | 3 712 230 ,— |
| ... | | | | |
| | Title 3 — Total | 6 842 451 | 7 602 137 | 9 515 059 ,— |
| ... | | | | |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 52 677 554 | 50 315 014 | 52 877 198 ,—’ |

Title

Chapter

Heading

2023 appropriations

2022 appropriations

2021 out-turn

‘3

OPERATING EXPENDITURES

3 1

GENERAL OPERATIONAL COSTS: SEMINARS FOR NSA, MEETINGS, MISSIONS, CONSULTATION SERVICES AND PUBLICATION

2 914 712

3 041 707

3 712 230 ,—

...

Title 3 — Total

6 842 451

7 602 137

9 515 059 ,—

...

GRAND TOTAL

52 677 554

50 315 014

52 877 198 ,—’

---
SERVICE LIST

msinick@ssd.com

carl.nelson@aa.com

rpommer@atlasair.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

jeff.morgan@delta.com

sametta.c.barnett@delta.com

charters@evergreenairlines.com

slachter@lachter-clements.com

agoerlich@ggh-airlaw.com

howard.kass@usairways.com

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com

nssparks@fedex.com

anbird@fedex.com

david.heffernan@wilmerhale.com

jeffrey.manley@united.com

matwood@sherblackwell.com

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com

dvaughan@kelleydrye.com

mlbenge@zsrlaw.com

bill@mietuslaw.com

william.stallings@usdoj.gov

dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

12889958.1
**EXHIBIT
      32**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John C. Roman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Lee R. Schlesinger,
      Vice President and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)   The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)   The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of the date
      and for the period covered by the Report.








/s/
                John C. RomanJohn
                C. RomanPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer/s/
                Lee R. SchlesingerLee
                R. SchlesingerVice
                President and Treasurer(Principal
                Financial Officer)








Date:
      August 8, 2007
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00528-CV

Russell E. WILLIAMS and Judy W. Williams,

Appellants

v.

Winfred J. WILLIAMS,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 111223B

Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. We 

ORDER that appellants, Russell E. Williams and Judy W. Williams, bear all costs of this appeal.

SIGNED August 20, 2014.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
#### JERRY LAMPERT REAL ESTATE, INC., a Florida Corporation, and Leonard Davidson, d/b/a Security Real Estate, Appellants, v. GROWTH EQUITIES, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, Appellee.

No. 76-2270.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 5, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 25, 1978.

Sidney B. Shapiro, Coral Gables, for appellants.

Friedman & Britton and J. Robert Olian, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

PEARSON, Judge.

The appellants are real estate brokers. They sued the appellee, Growth Industries, Inc., and others to recover a commission, claiming that they were the procuring cause of a sale by the appellee to Jerome D. *192Franklin, Trustee.1 The appellants also alleged a conspiracy between the appellee-seller and the purchaser to deprive the appellants of a commission. After extensive depositions and the filing of an affidavit by the appellee-seller, the trial judge entered a summary final judgment for the seller. This appeal is from that judgment.

It appears without genuine issue of material fact that appellants were not the procuring cause of the sale, as they were unable to sell the property to one Anne Dreck-sler. Negotiations concluded, and thereafter, another broker effected a sale to the purchaser, Jerome D. Franklin, Trustee. The fact that Anne Drecksler was an investor in the trust and participated in some of the negotiations to effect the sale is not enough to show that the appellants were the procuring cause of the sale. The allegation of a conspiracy was disposed of by an affidavit of the appellee, which was not controverted by any fact in the record. Cf. *Burbridge v. Berk,*77 So.2d 785 (Fla.1955); *Shuler v. Allen,*76 So.2d 879 (Fla.1955); *Judson v. Mobley,*62 So.2d 730 (Fla.1953); and *Wilkins*v. *W. B. Tilton Real Estate and Insurance, Inc.,*257 So.2d 573 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971).

Affirmed.

1

. A previous appeal from a summary final judgment for the purchasers is reported at *Jerry Lampert Real Estate, Inc. v. Franklin,*349 So.2d 825 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). This court reversed the summary judgment. At that time, there had been no determination of the issue of whether appellants were the procuring cause of the sale.
Exhibit 10.01


 


 


August
20, 2015


 


Stein
Revelsby


Chief
Executive Officer


Anoto
AB


 


Re:
Extension of Term of TLA


 


Dear
Mr. Revelsby:


 


LeapFrog
Enterprises, Inc. (“LeapFrog”), on the one hand, and Anoto AB and Anoto Group AB (“Anoto”) on the other
hand, are parties to a Technology License Agreement dated January 25, 2004, as subsequently amended by written agreement (the
“TLA”).


 


Pursuant
to recent discussions, LeapFrog and Anoto agree that the Set Term of the TLA is hereby extended to December 31, 2023. For the
avoidance of doubt, LeapFrog may continue to make use of the remaining balance of pre-paid royalties during this extension of
the term.


 


Please
indicate your agreement to the foregoing by returning a countersigned copy this letter to LeapFrog.


 


Sincerely,


 


/s/
John Barbour


 


John
Barbour


Chief
Executive Officer


LeapFrog
Enterprises, Inc.


 


 


	Accepted and agreed:	 	Accepted and agreed:
	Anoto AB	 	Anoto Group AB
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:  	/s/ Stein Revelsby	 	By:  	/s/ Stein Revelsby
	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:  	Stein Revelsby	 	Name:	Stein Revelsby
	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:	CEO	 	Title: 	CEO


 





Phone
| 510.420.5000


 


6401
Hollis Street, Suite 100


Emeryville,
CA 94608-1070
#### Ferdinand D’ALAURO, Appellant, v. PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., etc., and Travelers Insurance Company, etc., Appellees.

No. 77-586.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 11, 1978.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Hawkesworth, Schmick, Ponzoli & Wassenberg, Miami, for appellant.

Blackwell, Walker, Gray, Powers, Flick & Hoehl and James E. Tribble, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, NATHAN and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals a final judgment on a jury verdict. The single point presented urges error upon the trial court’s denial of plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The weight of the evidence and a claimed prejudicial comment of defendant’s counsel are *261urged as grounds for a new trial. We hold that the record supports the verdict and that the claimed prejudicial comment concerning workman’s compensation was in response to statements by plaintiff’s attorney. The judgment is affirmed. See Ward *v. Hopkins,*81 So.2d 493 (Fla.1955); and *Pix Shoes of Miami, Inc. v. Howarth,*201 So.2d 80 (Fla.3d DCA 1967). See also *Murray v. State,*154 Fla. 688, 18 So.2d 782 (1944); and *Tyson v. State,*87 Fla. 392, 100 So. 254 (1924).

Affirmed.