alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA Aviation Army officer leads intra-theater distribution initiative in Iraq for CDDOC 

/ Published Nov. 20, 2017
Richmond, Va, 
A Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Army officer has been selected to lead an intra-theater distribution initiative by U.S. Central Command’s Deployment and Distribution Operations Center in Iraq Oct. 26 – 31, to  provide better aerial distribution support at the tactical level support for our warfighters serving on Iraq’s frontlines.  

Army Maj. Alex Shimabukuro, a Defense Logistics Agency Aviation operations officer in the Army Customer Facing Division, Customer Operations Directorate, is deployed supporting Operation Inherent Resolve with the CDDOC in Kuwait. Shimabukuro recently visited Camp Taji, Iraq. 

Shimabukuro was embedded with the 275th Combat Sustainment Support Battalion out of Fort Lee, Virginia, and met with various key battalion leaders to gain insights on sustainment operations and challenges throughout their areas of responsibility. He also visited the postal team at Camp Taji and received an overview on postal operations from Army Staff Sgt. Glenda Hernandez, the noncommissioned officer in charge for postal operations from the 387th Postal Platoon out of Missouri.   

Shimabukuro said the logistics of maneuvering was the first challenge. He closely coordinated multiple arrangements with a variety of military organizations for life support, work space and transportation Shimabukuro spent an entire day at the supply support activity, or SSA, with Army Chief Warrant Officer 2 Alexander Rodriguez, SSA accountability officer with the 574 Composite Supply Company, Fort Wainwright, Alaska, and the nineteen contractors who conduct daily SSA operations at Camp Taji’s, Iraq. During his week-long site visit at Camp Taji, Shimabukuro observed all current distribution processes as related to current military operations in theater.  

“In comparison to previous deployments, visiting Camp Taji and seeing distribution processes in Iraq was eye opening,” said Shimabukuro.

“It is extremely rewarding to understand DLA’s role in multi-class support to the SSA and to have CDDOC seek ways to optimize distribution processes,” said Rodriguez.

Shimabukuro will continue to visit other U.S. military bases in Iraq to gain similar insights on distribution processes.
No. 8996.

#### Alkire *v.*Alkire et al.

(Decided February 20, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Madison county.

*Mr. John B. Tanner*and *Mr. John Logan,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. McCloud & Converse*and *Messrs. Abernethy é Folsom,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Bellows Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,
2003 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  November 10, 2003
254 La. 18

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Renaldo GAUTHIER.

No. 49857.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1969.

In re: Renaldo Gauthier applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

The application is denied and the stay order is recalled. The judgment is correct. See Art. 21, Code of Criminal Procedure.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. The transcript reflects that defendant was denied the opportunity of being heard orally in defense or mitigation and this is violative of C.Cr.Pro. Articles 21 and 22.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1720 

To provide enhanced penalties for crimes committed using funds appropriated 

for remediation of any injury or damage caused by Hurricane Katrina. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2005 

Mr. CORNYN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide enhanced penalties for crimes committed using 

funds appropriated for remediation of any injury or damage caused by Hurricane Katrina. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Katrina Waste, Fraud, 

5 and Abuse Deterrence Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ENHANCED PENALTIES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 18, United 

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 
2 

•S 1720 IS

1 ‘‘§ 26. Enhanced penalties 

2 ‘‘Whoever commits any violation of this title and such 

3 violation involves funds appropriated for remediation of 

4 any injury or damage caused by Hurricane Katrina shall 

5 be fined under this title, imprisoned not less than 5 years 

6 and not more than 20 years, or both, in addition to any 

7 other penalty authorized.’’. 

8 (b) CHAPTER ANALYSIS.—The table of sections for 

9 chapter 1 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 

10 adding at the end the following: 

‘‘Sec. 26. Enhanced penalties.’’. 

Æ
Exhibit 23.1



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We consent to incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements (Nos.
33-66308,  333-07425,  333-07427)  on Form S-8 of  American  Physicians  Service
Group,  Inc.  of our report  dated March 6, 1998,  relating to the  consolidated
balance sheets of American Physicians Service Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
shareholders'  equity,  and cash  flows for each of the years in the  three-year
period ended December 31, 1997 which report appears in the Annual Report on Form
10-K of American  Physicians Service Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
1997.




Austin, Texas
March 28, 1998                     BY:  /s/  KPMG Peat Marwick, LLP
                                   --------------------------------
# New Distribution commander visits Corpus Christi site

/ Published July 20, 2018
CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas, 
DLA Distribution commander Navy Supply Corps Rear Adm. Kevin Jones recently made his first trip to DLA Distribution Corpus Christi, Texas, which serves as the primary wholesale distribution point for major components to support helicopter repair missions for Department of Defense and Foreign Military Sales customers worldwide.

The visit kicked off with a command brief from site commander Army Lt. Col. Dan Bidetti on the distribution’s mission and included presentations from the site’s DLA Aviation partner and primary customer Corpus Christi Army Depot. 

Jones then hosted a town hall for distribution center employees where he recognized several employees with awards and discussed his command philosophy.  Focusing on customer, culture and command, he emphasized that, as the distribution center’s most important resources, employees need to stay safe, particularly in the midst of hurricane season.

In the afternoon, Jones toured the distribution center’s facilities during which he received a briefing on the site’s implementation of its commercial, off-the-shelf Warehouse Management System (COTS-WMS) and reviewed the COTS-WMS production area. 

The system, the first of its kind within the DLA network, is designed to offer flexible, automated support for processing various goods movements and for managing stocks within the distribution center.  It replaced the Distribution Standard System to align with current industry standards, streamline processes, reduce redundant systems and improve reporting capabilities and communication between DLA Distribution and its customers.

The day concluded with a final review of the day’s events and a meeting between Jones, Bidetti and host Naval Air Station Corpus Christi commander Capt.  Philip Brock.   Together, the three celebrated their alma mater, Norwich University, commemorating the meeting with a photo.
**Crops by State (95111)-  README.DOCar198897.csvas192974.csvas197587.csvas198897.csvbr186629.csvbr193074.csvbr197587.csvbr198897.csvcn186629.csvcn193074.csvcn197587.csvcn198897.csvct197587.csvct198897.csvdba8896.csvdbb8896.csvdbc8896.csvdbd8896.csvha186629.csvha193064.csvha196587.csvha198897.csvot186629.csvot193074.csvot197587.csvot198894.csvot198897.csvpn190929.csvpn193074.csvpn197587.csvpn198897.csvsb192429.csvsb193074.csvsb197587.csvsb198897.csvsf198897.csvwa186629.csvwa193074.csvwa197587.csvwa198897.csvwd191929.csvwd193074.csvwd197587.csvwd198897.csvws190929.csvws193074.csvws197587.csvws198897.csvww190929.csvww193074.csvww197587.csvww198897.csv

**
New policy prohibits DoD employees from using GPS services in operational areas
 
  By DLA Public Affairs
        DLA Intelligence           Defense Information Systems Agency’s Information Assurance Support Environment website
|  | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or 78o(d),      and, |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  September      9, 2008 | /s/ Robert S.      Hekemian                           |
|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    | Robert      S. Hekemian                               |
|                                    | Chairman      of the Board and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
#### George J. BRIGNAC, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant, v. PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, Leonard S. Withrow, Thelma Stegall Withrow and Trinity Universal Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellees-Appellants, and Odell Vinson Oilfield Contractors, Inc. and Travelers Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellees-Appellants.

No. 2717.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Third Circuit.

June 12, 1969.

Dissenting Opinion June 24, 1969.

Hall, Raggio, Farrar & Barnett, by R. W. Farrar, Jr., Lake Charles, for defendant-appellant, Pan American Petroleum Corp.

Cormie & Morgan, by Nathan A. Cormie, Lake Charles, for plaintiff-appellee, Edna M. Brignac.

Plauché & Plauché, by Allen L. Smith, Jr., Lake Charles, for defendant-appellee, Trinity Universal Ins. Co.

Jerry Kirk, Lake Charles, for plaintiff-appellee-appellant George Brignac.

Kaufman, Anderson, Leithead, Scott & Boudreau, by James A. Leithead, Lake Charles, for Leonard S. Withrow and Thelma S. Withrow, defendants-appellees-appel-lants.

Hold & Woodley, by Donald E. Walter, Lake Charles, for Odell Vinson Oilfield Contractors, Inc., defendants-appellees-ap-pellants.

*94Before TATE, HOOD and MILLER, JJ.

MILLER, Judge.

For the reasons stated in the consolidated case of Brignac v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation, 224 So.2d 84, in which a separate decision is being rendered by us this date, the judgment appealed in the present case is affirmed.

Affirmed.

HOOD, Judge

(dissenting).

For the reasons which I assigned in my dissenting opinion in Brignac v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation et al., 224 So.2d 84, I respectfully dissent from the opinion rendered by the majority in the instant suit.
onvo-ex103_533.htm


 

Exhibit 10.3

ORGANOVO HOLDINGS, inc.

SEVERANCE AND CHANGE IN CONTROL PLAN

PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT

This Participation Agreement (“Participation Agreement”) is entered into effective as of November 4, 2015, by and between ___________ (the “Participant”) and Organovo Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) pursuant to the Organovo Holdings, Inc., Severance and Change of Control Plan (the “Plan”).  All capitalized terms used in this Participation Agreement not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in Section 1 of the Plan, except as otherwise specified.

Pursuant to the Plan, the Participant has been designated as a Tier [1] [2] [3] [4] Executive, eligible to receive Severance Benefits as specified in Section 6 of the Plan provided the Participant agrees to comply with all of the terms and conditions of the Plan by entering into this Participation Agreement.  

Accordingly, the Participant hereby agrees that [s]he has received a copy of the Plan and has reviewed and understands all of the terms and conditions of the Plan, and hereby agrees to comply with and be bound by all of the terms and conditions of the Plan, including, but not limited to, the Restrictive Covenants set forth in Section 7(b) of the Plan; At-Will Employment status set forth in Section 7(c) of the Plan; Nonduplication; No Impact on Benefits provisions of Section 7(d) of the Plan; Benefit Claims provisions of Section 7 of the Plan; Right of Recoupment set forth in Section 9 of the Plan; Right of Offset set forth in Section 10(e) of the Plan; and Arbitration provisions set forth in Section 10(k) of the Plan.  

The Participant also agrees and understands that if [s]he is covered by an existing employment or severance agreement with the Company on the Effective Date, [his][her] existing rights under that agreement are terminated and replaced with the provisions of this Plan; provided, however, that for the duration of the original remaining term of such employment or severance agreement only, the timing and form of severance (i.e., lump sum or installments) in the employment or severance agreement shall supersede the timing and form of payment provisions in Section 6 of the Plan and control the timing and form of payment of the Cash Severance to the extent required to comply with the requirements of Code section 409A.  

The Participant also agrees that, by execution of this Participation Agreement, the award agreements for all outstanding equity awards held by the Participant as of the Effective Date are hereby amended to provide that the terms “Cause”, “Change of Control”, “Disability” and “Good Reason” as used in those award agreements shall have the meanings set forth in Section 2 of the Plan.  

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Participant hereby agrees to the requirements for participation in the Plan as set forth in this Participation Agreement and the Plan, and executes this Participation Agreement this ___ day of ________, 2015.  

 


	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
[PARTICIPANT]
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.42
712 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10019
(212) 957-5002












November 12, 2015






GS Direct, L.L.C.
c/o Goldman Sachs & Co.  
85 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004
Attention: Bradley J. Gross 

Re: Purchase Agreement


Dear Sir/Madam:


Reference is made to the Purchase Agreement, dated November 13, 2013, by and between GS Direct, L.L.C. (“GS Direct”) and Griffon Corporation (“Griffon”), as amended by that letter agreement dated November 12, 2014.


This is to confirm our agreement that Section 10 of the Purchase Agreement (“Right of First Negotiation, Investment Agreement and Registration Rights Agreement”) is hereby amended to extend the period thereunder from December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2016.


Please execute this letter in the space provided below to confirm your agreement with the foregoing. 


Sincerely,


Griffon Corporation




/s/ Ronald J. Kramer_________
Ronald J. Kramer
Chief Executive Officer


Acknowledged and Agreed:




G.S. Direct, L.L.C.




/s/ Bradley J. Gross__________
Bradley J. Gross
Vice President
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Heidi ONeil, the Director of Finance and Administration of Z-Axis Corporation (the Company),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to
the best of my knowledge:  (1)
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2005 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: July 14, 2005 /s/ Heidi ONeil
Heidi ONeil
Director of Finance and Administration
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
  

			
	Mitek Systems, Inc. Executive Bonus Program    	  	Fiscal 2016
	 	  	 

 Objective 
 The objective
of the Mitek Executive Bonus Program (the “Program”) is to reward executives with an opportunity to earn an annual cash bonus for their contributions to the achievement of corporate goals during the fiscal year. This plan is intended to
ensure a competitive total compensation opportunity and to foster a team effort in the attainment of corporate goals. 
 Program Design 

The Program provides for the payment of an annual cash bonus that is based upon the percentage achievement of the fiscal 2016 annual revenue and/or non-GAAP
net income targets set by the Board of Directors as well as individual performance goals. 
 Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer
(CFO) Bonus 
 Annual cash bonuses are computed as a percentage of the participant’s annualized salary earned during the 2016 fiscal year. The bonus
targets for the CEO and CFO are equal to 80% and 50%, respectively, of their respective annualized salaries for fiscal 2016. The total annual cash bonus will be comprised of the following components: 50% based on revenue performance, 25% based on
non-GAAP net income performance and 25% based on individual performance goals. 
 Chief Revenue Officer (CRO) Bonus 

The CRO will receive a quarterly cash bonus based on quarterly revenue achievement. The annual bonus target for the CRO is equal to 100% of his annualized
salary for fiscal 2016. 
 Eligibility 
 In order to be
eligible for a bonus award, the participant must be employed by the Company for a minimum of a full quarter of the fiscal year for which a annual bonus is earned. Each participant will be paid after the close of the books and annual audit at the end
of the 2016 fiscal year is substantially complete, and any bonus payable will be calculated pro rata to the number of days of employment with the Company during the 2016 fiscal year. 

Limitations 
 The Program is administered by the
Compensation Committee. Final authority and full discretion in all matters pertaining to the development, or amendment of the Program and the granting of any bonus award under the Program rests with the Compensation Committee. 

Participation in the Program does not in any way imply a contractual relationship for employment or in any way alter the at-will employment relationship with
the Company.
EXHIBIT
10.29
 PAYCHEX, INC.
BOARD DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
  Article 1
Purpose & Effective Date
 Purpose
 Effective Date
 Article 2
Definitions
  Account Balance
 Affiliate
 Amended Distribution Election Form
 Annual Deferral Account
 Annual Election Form




---



##### 



Annual Enrollment Materials
 Annual Participant Deferral
 Annual Retainer
 Beneficiary
 Board
 Change in Control
 Code
 Committee
 Company
 Deferral Election
 Deferred Compensation Account Account
 Designated Fund
 2




---



##### 



Designation Date
 Director
 Disability
 Distribution Election
 Effective Date
 Eligible Compensation
 ERISA
 Investment Adjustment
 Investment Agent
 Meeting Fees
 Newly Eligible Director
 Participant
 3




---



##### 



Paychex
 Plan
 Plan Year
 Pre-2010 Deferral Account
 Section 409A
 Separation from Service
 Unforeseeable Emergency
 Article 3
Eligibility, Selection and Enrollment
 Selection by Committee
 Enrollment Requirements
 4




---



##### 



Commencement of Participation
 Subsequent Plan Year Elections
 Article 4
Participant Deferrals, Taxes and Vesting
 Participant Deferrals
 Deferral Election
 5




---



##### 



Minimum and Maximum Deferrals
 Deferral Designations
 Deferral Deductions
 Suspension of Deferral Elections
   6




---



##### 



Vesting
 Article 5
Designated Funds and Investment Adjustments
 Designated Funds
 Investment Directions .
   7




---



##### 



provided however
 Adjustment of Accounts .
 8




---



##### 



No Investment Liability; Indemnification
 Article 6
Distribution of Accounts
 Distribution Elections .
 Initial Election
 9




---



##### 



Subsequent Election provided however
 Payment on Specified Date
 Payment upon Separation from Service
 Payment upon Death of Participant .
 10




---



##### 



Payment upon Change in Control of Paychex
 Six-Month Delay for Specified Employees
 Withdrawal in the Event of an Unforeseeable Emergency
 Form of Payment
 Article 7
Beneficiaries; Participant Data
 Designation of Beneficiaries
  11




---



##### 



Information to Be Furnished By Participants and Beneficiaries; Inability to Locate
Participants or Beneficiaries
 Article 8
Amendment or Termination
 Amendment provided however
 Termination
 12




---



##### 



Article 9
Administration
 Committee Duties
 Agents
 Article 10
Miscellaneous
 Status of Plan
 Section 409A
 Unsecured General Creditor
 13




---



##### 



Nonassignability
 Not a Contract of Service
 Terms
 Captions
 Governing Law
 Notice
 
   Successors
 14




---



##### 



Validity
 * * * * *
 15