alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Frosty Bear run frost-free but fun 

/ Published Jan. 25, 2017
Although the weather was almost 50 degrees and felt a good 10 degrees warmer in the sun, the annual Frosty Bear 5K run-walk saw a record 233 participants Jan. 25 at the McNamara Headquarters Complex.The Defense Logistics Agency swept the top spots among the runners this year. Ryan Stickel took the top spot among male runners, with a time of 17:58. In second place was Alex Cano at 18:44. For the women runners, Beofra Butler was first with a time of 22:12, followed by Erin Hall at 23:08.For the women walkers, DLA’s Louise Hansen took the top spot at 39:20, and Janice Sypolt was second at 39:55. Among the walking men, Marcus Young of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency was first at 38:54, followed by DLA’s Chris Misener at 44:35.The 3.1-mile course began and ended at Gate 2 of the HQC, wending its way through the woods via a paved path on the main Fort Belvoir post. The DLA Police provided security where the course followed public roads.The annual event, organized by Installation Support and the HQC Fitness Center staff, is intended to promote workforce resiliency by getting employees out of “hibernation mode” during the usually cold Mid-Atlantic winter. Last year’s historic blizzard and government closure meant the event was canceled. But this year, participants were mostly in short sleeves, given the spring-like conditions.As with previous HQC walk-run events, the male and female winner in each category received a $50 gift card, courtesy of sponsor Wegmans Food Markets.
EXHIBIT
      32(a)






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Oak Hill Financial, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R.
      E.
      Coffman, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




*/s/
      R. E. Coffman, Jr.*




R.
      E.
      Coffman, Jr.


President
      & Chief Executive Officer




November
      9, 2006






-25-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                            8632
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    28181
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1205
<INVENTORY>                                      29317
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 68890
<PP&E>                                           67162
<DEPRECIATION>                                   19360
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  130634
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            26168
<BONDS>                                         206793
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     110282
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                     (214441)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    130634
<SALES>                                         167458
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                167458
<CGS>                                            83932
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    83932
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   158
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                9588
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  28123
<INCOME-TAX>                                     10101
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              18022
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     13740
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.23


</TABLE>
UNITED
STATES


SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549





FORM
8-K





CURRENT
REPORT





PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF


THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





Date of
Report (Date of earliest event reported) July 17, 2008





UNITED FINANCIAL BANCORP,
INC.


(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)





Federal
            000-51369
            83-0395247(State
      or Other Jurisdiction
            (Commission
      File No.)
            (I.R.S.
      Employerof
      Incorporation)
            
            Identification
      No.)95 Elm Street, West
      Springfield, Massachusetts
            
            01089(Address
      of Principal Executive Offices)
            
            (Zip
      Code)








Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code:    (413)
787-1700





Not
Applicable


(Former
name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the
appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):





o  Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
230.425)





o  Soliciting
material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14a-12)





o  Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))





o  Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))











Item
      2.02
            Results of Operations
      and Financial Condition.





On July
17, 2008, United Financial Bancorp, Inc. issued a press release disclosing
financial results for the three months ended June 30, 2008.  The
Company also announced a quarterly dividend payment of $0.07 per share payable
on August 26, 2008, to shareholders of record as of August 12,
2008.  A copy of the press release is included as Exhibit 99.1 to this
report.





The
information in the preceding paragraph, as well as Exhibit 99.1 referenced
therein, shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.





Item
      9.01.
            Financial Statements
      and Exhibits.





(a)
            Not
      Applicable.





(b)
            Not
      Applicable.





(c)
            Not
      Applicable.





(d)
            Exhibits.





Exhibit
      No.
            Description99.1
            Press
      release dated July
      17, 2008.











SIGNATURES








Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto
duly authorized.





UNITED
      FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC.DATE:  July 21,
    2008
            By:
            richard b. collinsRichard
      B. CollinsPresident and Chief Executive
      Officer
#### J. P. LANDAHL, Jr., Appellant, v. Melvin SMITH, Appellee.

No. 78-328.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 7, 1978.

Edward DeV. Bunn, Arlington, Va., for appellant.

No appearance by appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. See *PTS of Gainesville, Inc. v. Olivetti Corporation of America,*334 So.2d 324 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).

BOARDMAN, A. C. J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
# DLA Intel chief, U.S. Pacific Command leaders discuss latest threats, travel rules, more 

/ Published July 20, 2017
Could you be putting yourself or the Defense Logistics Agency at risk on social media?Is someone you know accessing restricted areas after hours?Are you up to speed on the new rules for some employees on unofficial travel outside the United States?Insider threats and foreign travel were just two topics Stephanie Samergedes, the director of DLA Intelligence, discussed with the commanders and directors of all DLA field activities, in her June visit to DLA Pacific headquarters at Camp H.M. Smith, Hawaii.Samergedes is in charge of intelligence, counterintelligence, information security, operations security, personnel security, foreign disclosure and special programs for DLA.Detecting insider threats is a major priority for DLA Intelligence. Signs of potential insider threats include:      - Information posted on social media that indicates issues with the co-workers or family;
      - Access to unauthorized areas outside of normal work hours;
      - Unexplained disposable income such as buying expensive items while complaining about finances.

Any employee who knows of someone displaying any of these possible signs of an insider threat should report them to the local DLA Intelligence representative or senior leader.The group also discussed intelligence reporting and analysis, counterintelligence and the new Security Executive Agent Directive 3, “Reporting Requirement for Personnel With Access to Classified Information or Who Hold a Sensitive Position.” SEAD 3 mandates that all covered personnel with access to report all unofficial foreign travel and all foreign contacts. (See this recent article for more information.) Samergedes acknowledged that this can be difficult for personnel who have daily contact with foreign nationals, such as many employees in DLA Pacific. However, most of the reporting requirements are not new; SEAD 3 provides clarification and specific guidance. In addition, Samergedes met with senior officials from U.S. Pacific Command Intelligence, the 500th Military Intelligence Brigade and the Army 8th Theater Sustainment Command. The group discussed intelligence and counterintelligence reports and products, as well as current capabilities and how these organizations might fulfill DLA Pacific’s requirements for more real-time intelligence, counterintelligence and insider-threat information. She also shared intelligence and counterintelligence products DLA Intelligence publishes daily and discussed the potential for more DLA Intelligence support to DLA Pacific. The senior leaders praised the current support from DLA Intelligence, and Samergedes was happy to see how well DLA Intelligence personnel have integrated themselves into DLA Pacific. She promised to continue to look for ways to improve the products and services DLA Intelligence provides.
#### Leveral “Sparky” RAFFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. W-412.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 8, 1978.

*139Guillermon A. Ruiz and Philip J. Padova-no, of Ruiz & Padovano, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

MILLS, Judge.

The facts of this case are sufficiently set forth in prior opinions entered in this cause.1 Pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court, the sole issue for our determination is whether Raffield consented to the warrantless search of his barn.

Where consent is relied upon to justify a warrantless search, the State has the burden of proving that the consent was freely and voluntarily given and was not mere acquiescence to apparent authority. *Bumper v. North Carolina,*391 U.S. 543, 88 S.Ct. 1788, 20 L.Ed.2d 797 (1968). Such consent must be established by clear and convincing evidence. *Talavera v. State,*186 So.2d 811 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966).

The transcript of the suppression hearing reveals that the State was not relying on consent to justify the warrantless search. What was said and done at Raf-field’s farm immediately prior to the search was not even mentioned in the State’s presentation. After the State rested, John Van Tronk, an agent of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, was called by the defense. He stated that nine law enforcement officers from various state, local and federal agencies in four or five vehicles went to Raffield’s farm after receiving instructions to search the barn. Raffield was in front of his house when the officers arrived. Van Tronk told Raffield that the officers were going to search the barn and asked Raffield if he wanted to go down to the barn with them. Raffield got in the car with Van Tronk. When they arrived at the barn Van Tronk said, “We’re going to *140search the barn now”, and Raffield replied, “Well, it’s in there” or “I’m guilty” or words to that effect.

> “Acquiescence which is resignation — a mere submission in an orderly way to the actions of arresting agents — is not that consent which constitutes an unequivocal, free and intelligent waiver of a fundamental right.” *United States*v. *Gregory,*204 F.Supp. 884 (S.D.N.Y.1962).

Clearly, there was no consent to the war-rantless search at Raffield’s barn. The trial court erred in denying Raffield’s motion to suppress the evidence, and therefore the judgments of conviction and sentences are reversed.

McCORD, C. J., concurs.

BOYER, J., dissents.

1

. *Raffield v. State,*333 So.2d 534 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), quashed in part and remanded, 351 So.2d 945 (Fla.1977).

BOYER, Judge,

dissenting.

In my view Raffield’s words coupled with his actions constituted consent rather than mere acquiescence, submission or resignation. I would affirm.
DATE

Estimate #

CUSTOMER ID

 VALID UNTIL:

Quote Prepared For: 

Contact: Philip Fine

Address: 21865 Copley Drive, Dimond Bar, CA 91765 Prepared By: KAP

Phone: 310-486-4295

Email: pfine@aqmd.gov

End User: Quemetco and Exide Lead Time:

Description Unit Cost Qty. Total Price

Item 1. Xact 640 Multi-Metals Continuous Emission Monitor Rental $22,500 4 $90,000

a. Per month with a two month minimum at each sitea

b. Instrument rental rate for months beyond 4 monthsb $16,875 6 $101,250

Item 2. Probe and Transport

a. Fixed Cost (Probe, Heater Controllers, Flow measurement, etc) $19,325 1 $19,325

b. Transport line $469 20 $9,388

Item 3. Filter Tape 

a. 15 minute sampling intervals (10 months supply approximately 1 week tape 

change interval) $780 44 $34,320

Item 4. Site Visit for Instrument Placement NC 1 NC

Item 5. Site Visit for Kickoff Meeting NC 1 NC

Item 6. Installation and Training Site 1c $26,855 1 $26,855

Item 7. Installation and Training Site 2c $26,855 1 $26,855

Item 8. Decomissioning Site 1 $11,885 1 $11,885

Item 9. Decomissioning Site 2 $11,885 1 $11,885

Item 10. Shipping $7,000 1 $7,000

Item 11. QAG Testing Site 1 $20,555 1 $20,555

Item 12. QAG Testing Site 2 $20,555 1 $20,555

Item 13. Full Suite of standards (23 Analytes and interfering elements) $241 36 $8,676

Item 14. Annual Maintenance (Includes tube) $7,412 1 $7,412

Item 15. Annual Maintenance Labor (All maintenance including running 

standards for XRF recalibration) $7,990 1 $7,990

Item 16. Remote Control Package $9,500 1 $9,500

$413,451

Quote

8 Months from receipt of 

down-payment

2/5/2014

5/6/2014

SCAQMD02052014

SCAQMD

Total 

COOPER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, LLC

10180 S. W. Nimbus Ave. Suite J6

Portland, OR 97223 U.S.A

Phone (503) 670-9215 Fax (503) 624-2120

www.cooperenvironmental.com
 

 

NC = No Charge

Exide, Quemetco or SCAQMD responsible for day to day instrument operation

A 1.5% finance charge is automatically applied to the contract balance once it becomes 30 days or more deliquent.

a. Rental is for operating time - rent is not charged during set up or during any maintenance events should they occur- Month is defined at 30 da

b. Lease to own - ownership achieved in 14 months. Alternatively the difference to $259,000 could be paid in full at any time

c. Please see site requirements below

PAYMENT TERMS: Net 30

DOWN PAYMENT: Fixed Equipment Costs and first and last months rent at signing $126,209.00

Remaining Payments: Rental and Labor (training, installation billed monthly)

Infrastructure as necessary including power, compressed air, appropriate sample port, crane and labor

to lift instrument into position, and labor for regular instrument operation (e.g. tape changes)

Site Requirements
# Running for awareness: DSCR supports 80th Training Command’s 5K Run/Walk for Sexual Assault, Awareness Prevention Month

/ Published May 2, 2017
Richmond, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency’s Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Program and DLA employees at Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, supported the U.S. Army Reserve 80th Training Command’s (The Army School System) fifth annual 5K Run/Walk for Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month on April 28.  

DLA Aviation Sexual Assault Response Coordinator, Katrina Leverette collaborated with the 80th Training Command to organize and host the DSCR event. Leverette was a crucial player in notifying the DLA community about the event using internal broadcasts and flyers. 

“I felt that communication was key in driving participation in the event,” said Leverette. “My ultimate goal is prevention, so any event that will further that cause is important to support and bring awareness to.”  

In addition to employees, family members like Courtney Rackley, the wife of Corey Rackley, DLA Aviation contract specialist supervisor, showed up to support the race.  

“I run all the time and it can be scary,” said Courtney Rackley. “I tell my husband that he doesn’t understand how it feels to be scared to run in public. If you get somewhere that’s desolate, it’s dangerous because you don’t know what is out there, so any time we can bring awareness to a subject like this it is good.”  

“We always culminate [Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month] with the 5k Run,” said Army Sgt. Maj. William Downey, senior enlisted advisor, DLA Joint Reserve Force. “If one sexual assault or harassment happens, then that’s one too many.”  Downey added that if one does happen, then he wants the community to be knowledgeable about the organizations and resources that can assist a survivor like DLA’s Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Program.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Rivet Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2005 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  August 8, 2005
#### Lawrence HAMMER and Roxalana Kersten v. STATE.

No. 37972.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1969.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 19, 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 213 So.2d 619.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 16.1


May 28, 1999



Office of the Chief Accountant
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Dear Sir/Madam:

We have read the first four paragraphs under Item 9 included in the Form
10-K/A-1 dated May 28, 1999 of Coaxial Communications of Central Ohio, Inc.,
Phoenix Associates and Insight Communications of Central Ohio, Inc. filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission and are in agreement with the statements
contained therein.


Very truly yours,

/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



cc:  Mr. Daniel Mannino, Vice President and Controller
     Coaxial Communications of Central Ohio, Inc.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

Certification of Treasurer



I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Big Sky Industries II, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: January 5, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer