alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Distribution Multicultural Committee celebrates LGBT Pride Month 

/ Published June 29, 2017
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, DLA Distribution’s Multicultural Committee celebrated the history of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Pride Month with a program on Wednesday, June 21. 
DLA Distribution deputy commander Twila C. Gonzales, Senior Executive Service welcomed everyone in attendance and gave a brief synopsis on the history of LGBT Month and why it is recognized by the Department of Defense and DLA Distribution, she then introduced the keynote speaker, Shaashawn Dial-Snowden, president of the Board of Directors for the LGBT Center of Central Pennsylvania.

“Diversity is one of our nation’s greatest strengths. During Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride month, we celebrate our rich diversity and renew our enduring commitment to equality,” explained Gonzales.

To begin her presentation, Dial-Snowden, a published author and poet, performed a poem to introduce herself to the audience. 

Dial-Snowden’s emphasis was the importance of inclusion. “When I recite LGBTQQ2S, I am saying that I see you. Labels are meaningful. Definitions ARE important.”

Dial-Snowden is currently pursuing a doctorate in administration and leadership studies at Indiana University of Pennsylvania Dixon Center in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Additionally, her education includes a Master in Public Administration from Shippensburg University, Shippensburg, Pennsylvania; a Bachelor of Arts in philosophy, law and rhetoric from Stephens College, Columbia, Missouri; Graduate Certificate in Academic Advising in Higher Education from Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas; LGBTQ Academy Gay Alliance Safe Zone Train-the-Trainer Certification from Rochester, New York, and 14 Stories Gay Wedding Institute Certification and graduate of Diversity Leadership Academy in Harrisburg. 

Additionally, the national anthem was performed by Matt Williams, deputy director of DLA Distribution Future Plans directorate. Pastor James Mott, chief of support services, provided the invocation.

LGBT Pride Month is celebrated each year in the month of June to honor the 1969 Stonewall riots in New York City. The Stonewall riots were a tipping point for the Gay Liberation Movement in the United States. The purpose of the commemorative month is to recognize the impact that Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender individuals have had on history locally, nationally, and internationally.

 DLA Distribution supports the DLA Equal Employment Opportunity vision to ensure consistent programs of equality, diversity and inclusion for all employees that empower the workforce to achieve their full potential and unify the workforce to achieve the mission.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Bertha THOMPSON.

No. 61075.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 22, 1978.

Rehearing Denied June 15, 1978.*

Frank L. Koles, III, Ponder & Ponder, Amite, for defendant-appellant.

*95William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leonard E. Yo-kum, Dist. Atty., William M. Quin, Asst, Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

*

 SUMMERS, J., would grant a rehearing.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Bertha Thompson, was indicted for second degree murder. La.R.S. 14:30.1. After a trial by jury defendant was found guilty of manslaughter and sentenced to imprisonment at hard labor for twenty-one years. On appeal, defendant relies upon eleven assignments of error for reversal of her conviction and sentence.

We have reviewed the record and find no merit to defendant’s assignments of error. Accordingly, we affirm her conviction and sentence.

SUMMERS, J., concur.
# MWR holds second annual Bellwood Bash at DSCR

/ Published Aug. 23, 2018
Richmond, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency Installation Operations Richmond’s Morale, Welfare and Recreation Office rang in its second annual Bellwood Bash Family and Friends Day Aug. 14, welcoming guests to enjoy food, DJ music, kids’ activities and a 5K fun run/walk on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia.

Bellwood Bash was created to celebrate the DLA community and families, and this year’s event promised even more fun with volleyball, horseshoes and corn hole, live entertainment and door prize giveaways. Kids ages three to 12, expended their energy in bounce houses, tried their hand at crafts and received custom artwork at the temporary tattoo station.

Devon Fenrick, product specialist, Supplier Operations Commodities Directorate, DLA Aviation, brought his son Deandre to experience the Bellwood Bash, and said the event was great for morale. When asked if he enjoyed the event, Deandre said, “It’s great to spend time with my dad.”

The fun run/walk opened the event, and the first 50 participants to register received a free t-shirt when they signed up at the starting line. Guests later refueled with an all-American meal of hot dogs and hamburgers, barbecue pork and chicken.

“It’s awesome to bring family and enjoy a family, stress-free day and to let your hair down,” said Navy Petty Officer 3rd Class Mayra Narkevic, logistics specialist, Logistics Department, Naval Operational Support Center, Richmond.

The event’s success was largely due to its gang of willing volunteers; roughly 30 people gave of their time and labor to ensure the Bellwood Bash went off without a hitch.

“The food was tasty and the vendors that were set up were helpful, like the employee benefits specialist who talked to me about retirement,” said Narkevic.

Bellwood Bash was generously sponsored by First Command Financial Services, Bellwood Federal Credit Union, Movement Mortgage, USAA Insurance, Sprint Wireless, Wells Fargo, and G.P.I.S. Employee Benefits Specialist.
#### Larry LILES v. STATE.

7 Div. 537.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Aug. 16, 1977.

*141Terry D. Gillis, Fort Payne, for appellant.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen. and Eugenia D. B. Hofammann, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. '

DeCARLO, Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction resulting from three guilty pleas.

The cases involved were: (1) sale of a controlled substance, “phencyclidine (PCP),” circuit court case number 75-CR-104; (2) possession of a controlled substance, “diazempam,” circuit court case number 76-CR-202; and (3) possession of marijuana for personal use, circuit court case number 9938.

In the felony cases the appellant received two four-year concurrent sentences. In the case involving the possession of marijuana for his personal use he received a six months’ sentence to run concurrently with the two four-year concurrent sentences.

Our examination of the record revealed that during the court’s explanation of the appellant’s constitutional rights, concerning the felony charges and their punishment, the court stated that the minimum punishment was imprisonment for two years and the maximum was imprisonment for twenty years. According to the section of the statute under which Liles was indicted, T. 22, § 258(47), Code of Alabama 1940, Recompiled 1958, 1973 Cum. Supp. To Vol. Six, a violation is punishable by imprisonment for not less than two nor more than fifteen years.

In *Moore v. State,*54 Ala.App. 463, 309 So.2d 500, this court stated:

> “ . . . *that there was error in incorrectly informing defendant of the maximum punishment . .*. [Emphasis added.]

The court also explained:

> “ . . .We cannot say that defendant’s failure to know that the maximum sentence that could be imposed upon him was fifteen years, instead of twenty years as incorrectly informed, had no influence upon his decision to withdraw his plea of not guilty.”

In view of the foregoing we are compelled to reverse the judgment of conviction in circuit court case number 75-CR-104, and circuit court case number 76-CR-202. However, in the case involving the possession of marijuana for his personal use, circuit court case number 9938, we affirm, the constitutional requisites for a voluntary plea having been shown.

REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART AND AFFIRMED IN PART.

All the Judges concur.
#### Issac Melvin WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1715.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 1, 1977.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Joseph R. Atterbury, Legal Intern, and James L. Eisenberg, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Marsha G. Madorsky, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

*383DAUKSCH, Judge.

Appellant, over eighteen years of age, was charged with the crime of attempted sexual battery upon a person eleven years of age or younger. Section 777.04(1) and Section 794.011(2), Florida Statutes (1975). At trial the State proved the person was older than eleven years and that she acted in a voluntary manner while the Defendant attempted a sexual act. In fact, she charged money for her participation. The trial court granted a Judgment of acquittal as to the crime charged but permitted, over objection, the trial to continue for the jury to determine whether the Defendant committed an attempted lewd assault as proscribed in Section 800.04, Florida Statutes (1975). The jury was unable to reach a verdict so a mistrial was declared. The Defendant was again brought to trial on the same indictment, attempted sexual battery upon a person under eleven, and the jury was given the case as a case of lewd assault. The Defendant was convicted of “handling & fondling a child under the age of 14 years in a lewd, lascivious or indecent manner.” This is essentially the wording of Section 800.04, Florida Statutes (1975). It is commonly called lewd assault. According to *DeLaine v. State,*262 So.2d 655 (Fla. 1972), lewd assault is not a necessarily lesser included offense.

Because lewd assault is not a necessarily lesser included offense then the court cannot charge the jury in regard to that crime unless the facts support such a charge and the accusatory pleading alleges all the elements of the lesser included offense. *Brown*v. *State,*206 So.2d 377 (Fla.1968). The accusatory pleading in the case at bar charges the Appellant “. did attempt to commit a Sexual Battery upon a person eleven (11) years of age or younger, . . .” The requisite allegations under the Lewd Assault Statute, Section 800.04, Florida Statutes (1975), are not there. That the State chose to go with those allegations even after the mistrial and the evident lack of proof is a curious circumstance, indeed. The Judgment and Sentence are REVERSED.

ANSTEAD and MOORE, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Crystal Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2005 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  May 12, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
    THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PHOENIX
    GOLD  INTERNATIONAL,  INC.'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED IN ITS ANNUAL
    REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL  YEAR  ENDING  SEPTEMBER  27, 1998 AND IS
    QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                    1
       
<S>                                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               SEP-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                    SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                                                2,602
<SECURITIES>                                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     4,287,965
<ALLOWANCES>                                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                                       6,886,720
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 11,792,908
<PP&E>                                                            6,101,572
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    3,579,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   15,208,128
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             3,772,293
<BONDS>                                                             938,233
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<COMMON>                                                          7,548,822
<OTHER-SE>                                                        2,948,780
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     15,208,128
<SALES>                                                          26,484,715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 26,484,715
<CGS>                                                            19,950,805
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    19,950,805
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  7,447,270
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  323,530
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  (1,227,374)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        455,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                (772,374)
 <DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                       (772,374)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                          (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          (.22)
        

</TABLE>
Drone/VAS Practice Group

# ANTONELLI

-- LAW--

U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave S.E. Washington, D.C
. 20590 35 E Wacker Drive Suite 1875 Chicago, IL 60601 Tel. 312.201.8310 Jeffrev @Antonelli

-Law
.com February 23 , 2016

Re: Amendment to Aerial Visual Productions, Inc
. Petition for Exemption Regulatory Docket No
. FAA-2016-3450 Dear Sir or Madam: Aerial Visual Productions, Inc., ("petitioner") requests an amendment to the previouslysubmitted petition available at Docket No. FAA-2016-3450, for the purpose of adding the commercial purpose ofclosed-set motion picture and television filming. Petitioner's Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) is being submitted confidentially. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §11.35, petitioner requests confidential treatment for its MPTOM. It requests that the information contained in that exhibit not be made public because they are trade secrets whose disclosure would harm the owner of the information. It contains valuable commercial data that is not publically available and is protected from release under the Freedom oflnformation Act, 5 U.S.C. §552(b)(4). Petitioner has requested the ability to use the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ and the Inspire 1 in its original petition. The FAA has previously determined that use of both UAs for closed-set motion picture and television filming is within the public interest. The DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ has been approved to film motion pictures in ExemptionNos. 11189, 11793 , 11849, 11854, and 11969. The DJI Inspire 1 has been approved to film motion pictures in Exemption Nos
. 11687, 11793, 11831,11847, 11854, and 11969
. Ifwe can provide any additional information to assist your understanding or review ofthis document, please do not hesitate to contact us at 312-201-8310 or via email at Jeffrevi'C 4Antonelli

Law. com.

Attorneys for Aerial Vi
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 162 (Thursday, August 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22217]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-412-001]


CNG Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

August 15, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 6, 1997, CNG Transmission Corporation 
(CNG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets with an effective 
date of August 1, 1997:

Sub. Twenty-Eighth Revised Sheet No. 32
Sub. Twenty-Eighth Revised Sheet No. 33

    CNG states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the 
July 22, 1997, letter order in the captioned proceeding, by which the 
Commission accepted CNG's July 1, 1997, quarterly Section 18.2.B 
surcharge filing effective August 1, 1997. The July 22 order specified 
that CNG's tariff accepted sheets were also subject to concurrent 
Commission action in CNG's pending general rate proceeding in Docket 
No. RP97-406. The Commission has suspended the rates in Docket No. 
RP97-406, until January 1, 1998. CNG proposes substitute Sheet Nos. 32 
and 33 that reflect the updated Section 18.2.B surcharge, along with 
the pre-existing rates that will remain in effect during the suspension 
period in Docket No. RP97-406.
    CNG states that copies of the filing are being mailed to CNG's 
customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests must be 
filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make the 
protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22217 Filed 8-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
##### 



Exhibit 21. Subsidiaries of the
Company

|                                         |  |                 |          |                              |  |                                         
|---------------------------------------- |  | --------------- | -------- | ---------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|                                         |  | Jurisdiction of |          | Names Under Which Subsidiary
|Name of Subsidiary                       |  | Incorporation   |          | Transacts Business          
|                                         |  |                 |          |                             
|Hudson Valley Bank                       |  |                 | New York |                              |  | Hudson Valley Bank                      
|Hudson Valley Investment Corp.           |  |                 | Delaware |                              |  | Hudson Valley Investment Corp.          
|Sprain Brook Realty Corp.                |  |                 | New York |                              |  | Sprain Brook Realty Corp.               
|Grassy Sprain Real Estate Holdings, Inc. |  |                 | New York |                              |  | Grassy Sprain Real Estate Holdings, Inc.
|HVB Leasing Corp.                        |  |                 | New York |                              |  | HVB Leasing Corp.                       
|HVB Realty Corp.                         |  |                 | New York |                              |  | HVB Realty Corp.                        
|HVB Employment Corp.                     |  |                 | New York |                              |  | HVB Employment Corp.                    
|A.R. Schmeidler & Co., Inc.              |  |                 | New York |                              |  | A.R. Schmeidler & Co., Inc.
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE 

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING 

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 

In The Supreme Court 

The State, Respondent, 

v. 

Demetrice Roosevelt James, Petitioner.

Appellate Case No. 2017-000700 

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF 

APPEALS 

Appeal from Richland County 

John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge 

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-MO-020 

Heard May 3, 2018 – Filed May 23, 2018 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED 

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, 

for Petitioner. 

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Assistant Attorney 

General V. Henry Gunter, Jr., and Solicitor Daniel E. 

Johnson, all of Columbia, for Respondent. 
PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court 

of Appeals in State v. James, Op. No. 2017-UP-028 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Jan. 11, 

2017). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. 

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1470 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Desmodur HL. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 22, 2005 

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Desmodur HL. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESMODUR HL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.09.02 Aromatic polyisocyanate 

based on toluene 

diisocyanate (TDI) and 

hexamethylene diisocyanate 

(HDI) (CAS No. 63368–95– 

6) dissolved in n-butyl acetate (provided for in subheading 3911.90.45) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•S 1470 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
No. 00-7124.

#### Peterson *v.*Lee, Warden.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-7058.

#### Nickerson *v.*Alabama.

Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari denied.
#### George J. FRANCE, Robert Brown and Walter B. Sauter v. CITY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF NEW ORLEANS et al.

No. 60391.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 1, 1977.

In re: George J. France, Robert Brown and Walter B. Sauter applying for supervisory writs of certiorari, prohibition or mandamus.

Writ denied. Inadequate showing to warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction at this time.

DENNIS, J.,

is of the view the continuance should be granted but concurs in the writ denial at this time because applicants may without prejudice renew their motion for continuance in the event the exception to unauthorized use of summary process is not sustained.