alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Yokosuka’s Safety Office sponsors off-site Emergency Preparedness training

/ Published May 9, 2018
YOKOSUKA, Japan, 
DLA Distribution Yokosuka, Japan’s Safety Office sponsored their first off-site training tour of the Yokosuka Municipal Disaster Prevention Center “ANSHINKAN” on April 4.  

“ANSHINKAN” in Ogawa-cho Yokosuka city Japan is where local residents can experience how to react to natural disasters such as earthquakes and fires.  Using a special earthquake simulator, they were able to experience an earthquake firsthand.  The simulator lets individuals feel a wide range of earthquake situations, including intensities from three to six, similar to past Japanese earthquakes, like the Great East Japan Earthquake and Great Hanshin Earthquake.  

The center also has a fire simulator that allows residents to learn how to put out a fire using a fire extinguisher and how to evacuate a room or building when there is smoke.  After the simulation, pictures and a videos of their experiences are available for individuals to review.

Due to the geographic and geological characteristics of the Japanese archipelago, middle to large-scale natural disasters can strike at any time.  While military conflicts or terrorism may be thwarted through human efforts, typhoons and earthquakes are unstoppable, affecting all those residing in the nation. Because natural disasters are inevitable, especially in Japan, it is all the more important for the local Distribution workforce to make sufficient preparations to cope with them, both in the workplace, and at home.

This experience enhances the employees’ knowledge of protection procedures during earthquakes, fire and storms.  Fifty-one employees have already participated in this training since the first offering.  In addition to providing an off-site experience, away from the normal workplace, this allows sections and teams an opportunity to bond.  

DLA Distribution Yokosuka plans to continue this small group training each week, until everyone at the Yokosuka distribution center has had an opportunity to experience this training.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of SureWest Communications (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:    March 11, 2009

By:

/s/DAN T. BESSEY Dan T. Bessey,
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SureWest Communications and will be retained by SureWest Communications and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certificate is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be considered filed as part of the
Form 10-K.

---



QuickLinks
**Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin
A product of the National Agricultural Statistics Service, Agricultural Statistics Board, U.S. Department of Agriculture**Description:**
**
#### Henry BRYANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-508.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 28, 1978.

Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, and Paul C. Helm, Asst. Public Defender, Bar-tow, for appellant.

Henry Bryant, pro se.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Henry Bryant appeals a judgment and sentence for two counts of aggravated assault. He pled guilty to these offenses. He now contends that the trial court erred in accepting his pleas.

A defendant who pleads guilty has no right to a direct appeal, but must obtain review by means of collateral attack. § 924.06(3), Fla.Stat. (1977); *Honeycutt v.*
      *147
      *State,*359 So.2d 503 (Fla. 2d DC A 1978). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

GRIMES, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.
**
USDA Economics and Statistics System
**
No. 40561.

#### Protest 962882-G of Karl Guggenheim, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of paper articles similar to those the subject of Abstract 25416. The claim at 35 percent under paragraph 1413 was therefore sustained as to the items invoiced as joke dolls.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Appellee 

 v. 

LOUIS ALEXANDER JOHNSON A/K/A 

LEWIS JOHNSON, 

 Appellant 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 108 MAP 2014 

Appeal from the order of the 

Commonwealth Court dated June 5, 2014 

at No. 303 MD 2014 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM DECIDED: March 25, 2015 

AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2015, the Order of the Commonwealth Court 

is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2 

STATEMENT OF ACTINGCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C.§1350 

        I,Anita K. Ho, the acting chief financial officer of Alliance Fiber Optic Products, Inc.(the “Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 oftitle 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge, 

        (i)                 the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report"), fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

        (ii)                 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Exhibit 99.1

                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of SLS International,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
John Gott, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

       (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



/s/ John Gott
-------------
John Gott
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# DSCC military personnel attend annual Veterans Day parade

/ Published Nov. 16, 2017
COLUMBUS, Ohio, Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime’s contingent of military personnel pose with Andrew J. Ginther, mayor of Columbus, Ohio, following the city’s Veterans Day parade Nov. 9. The service members were downtown to watch the annual parade. DLA Land and Maritime is located on the Defense Supply Center Columbus and employs more than two thousand federal civilians, contractors, and active duty members of the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines. More than a third of the workforce are veterans.
Exhibit 10.8


 


Summary of Horace Mann Educators Corporation


Named Executive Officer Annualized Salaries


 


The table below summarizes
the annualized salaries of Horace Mann Educators Corporation's (the "Company") Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial
Officer and the other three highest compensated Executive Officers, as defined in the Company's Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders (collectively the "Named Executive Officers"), excluding Mr. Stephen P. Cardinal who no longer
serves in the capacity of the Chief Marketing Officer. These salaries may be changed at any time at the discretion of the Compensation
Committee and/or Board of Directors of the Company. These are base salaries and do not include short-term and long-term incentive
compensation amounts, the Company's contributions to defined contribution plans and the Company's contributions to other employee
benefit programs on behalf of these individuals.


 


	Named Executive Officer	Annualized Salary
	Marita Zuraitis

President and Chief Executive Officer	$750,000
	Dwayne D. Hallman

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	$444,000
	Matthew P. Sharpe

Executive Vice President, Annuity & Life	$400,000
	John P. McCarthy

Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer	$300,000


 


Last revision date:
July 20, 2015


 




    	1
Order entered September 1, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00866-CV

IN RE COLUMBIA MEDICAL CENTER OF ARLINGTON SUBSIDIARY, L.P. D/B/A 

MEDICAL CENTER ARLINGTON, Relator

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-06294-C

ORDER

By letter dated July 21, 2015, the relator advised the Court that the parties had reached an 

agreement regarding the discovery dispute at issue in this original proceeding. We ORDER the 

parties to file a joint status report within ten days of the date of this order advising the Court of 

the status of this matter. 

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
#### James Henry THOMAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1831.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 26, 1977.

Stephen L. Raskin, Miami, for appellant.

*635Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Anthony Musto, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and BARKDULL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

HAVERFIELD, Judge.

Defendant, James Henry Thomas, appeals his convictions for burglary and grand larceny, and for his sole point on appeal argues that the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion for mistrial after the bailiff gave the jury a legal instruction during its deliberation. We find this point has merit.

Before the jury’s verdict was announced, the trial judge informed counsel that during the jury’s deliberations the foreman had advised the bailiff that the jury was deadlocked 5-1, and the bailiff responded that the jury had to reach a unanimous verdict. Defense counsel thereupon made a motion for mistrial which was denied. The trial judge then gave the jurors the “Allen charge” over objection of the defense and the jury retired to deliberate. Shortly thereafter verdicts of guilty were returned.

The instruction given to the jurors by the bailiff, which was legally incorrect, is in clear violation of Section 918.07, Florida Statutes (1975). Further, this court has held in *Holzapfel v. State,*120 So.2d 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960) that such communication between a bailiff and the jurors constitutes reversible error regardless of whether the bailiff’s answer is legally correct or not since the court alone is entitled to instruct the jury on the law and must do so in the presence of the jury. See also *Slinsky v. State,*232 So.2d 451 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970); *Randolph v. State,*336 So.2d 673 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410.

While counsel for the State concedes that the above communication constituted error, he contends that such error was cured upon the trial judge rendering the Allen charge to the jurors and directing them to further deliberate before they had announced their original verdict. We conclude to the contrary.

It is well established that nothing must be said or done by the trial court to embarrass or coerce an unconvinced juror or jurors to agree with the verdict or the majority simply because he or she is in the minority. *Jones v. State,*92 So.2d 261 (Fla. 1957). Under the circumstances in the case sub judice, the rendering of the Allen charge may have well deprived the defendant of a “hung jury” for, as the court stated in *Bell v. State,*311 So.2d 179, 181 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975): “An impediment to the exercise by a juror of a free and independent judgment is inconsistent with the mandate of Article I, Section 16, Constitution of the State of Florida, that the verdict of the jury must be impartial.”

The convictions of the defendant are reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.
# IdeaPaint

IdeaPaintTM PRO

Certified Status 10/14/2010 - 10/14/2014 Certificate Period 12690-410 Certificate Number

Products tested in accordance with UL 2821test method to show compliance to emission limits in UL 2818 , Section 7.1
. 

### UL 2818 Standard for Chemical Emissions for Building Materials, Finishes and Furnishings 

# CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

UL Environment investigated representative samples of the identified Product(s) to the identified Standard(s) or other requirements in accordance with the agreements and any applicable program service terms in place between UL Environment and the Certificate Holder (collectively “Agreement”). The Certificate Holder is authorized to use the UL Environment Mark for the identified Product(s) manufactured at the production site(s) covered by the ULE Test Report, in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. This Certificate is valid for the identified dates unless there is non-compliance with the Agreement.

## GREENGUARD Certification Criteria for Building Products and Interior Finishes

Criteria CAS Number Maximum Allowable Predicted Concentration Units TVOC (A) - 500 μg/m 3 Formaldehyde 50-00-0 61.3 (50 ppb) μg/m 3 Total Aldehydes (B) - 100 ppb Particle Matter less than 10 μm (C) - 50 μg/m 3 4-Phenylcyclohexene 4994-16-5 6.5 μg/m 3 Individual VOCs (D) - 1/10th TLV

-

(A) Defined to be the total response of measured VOCs falling within the C 6– C 16range, with responses calibrated to a toluene surrogate. (B) The sum of all measured normal aldehydes from formaldehyde through nonanal, plus benzaldehyde, individually calibrated to a compound specific standard. Heptanal through nonanal are measured via TD/GC/MS analysis and the remaining aldehydes are measured using HPLC/UV analysis. (C) Particle emission requirement only applicable to HVAC Duct Products with exposed surface area in air streams (a forced air test with specific test method) and for wood finishing (sanding) systems. (D) Allowable levels for chemicals not listed are derived from 1/10th of the Threshold Limit Value (TLV) industrial work place standard (Reference: American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists, 6500 Glenway, Building D-7, and Cincinnati, OH 45211-4438).

UL Environment investigated representative samples of the identified Product(s) to the identified Standard(s) or other requirements in accordance with the agreements and any applicable program service terms in place between UL Environment and the Certificate Holder (collectively “Agreement”). The Certificate Holder is authorized to use the UL Environment Mark for the identified Product(s) manufactured at the production site(s) covered by the ULE Test Report, in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. This Certificate is valid for the identified dates unless there is non-compliance with the Agreement.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 01 97 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RICHARD DENVER HINMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 1 4 , 20 20 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 9 2020

07/09/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0197
#### CITY OF WINTER PARK, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RELATIONS COMMISSION and Winter Park Professional Fire Fighters, Local 1598, Respondents.

No. 76-2132.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 9, 1977.

*225Charles R. Fawsett of Johnson, Motsinger, Trismen & Sharp, P. A., Orlando, for petitioner.

R. T. Donelan, Jr., Public Employers Relations Commission, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This is a review of an order of the Public Employees Relations Commission pursuant to a petition for review filed by the City of Winter Park. The petition challenges the correctness of an order allowing the inclusion of captains and lieutenants in a bargaining unit with other fire department employees. The City claims that the captains and lieutenants are “managerial employees”1 and “confidential employees”2 and therefore are not entitled to the collective bargaining rights provided in Chapter 447, Florida Statutes (1975).

Section 447.203 provides definitions for “managerial” and “confidential” employees who are to be excluded from collective bargaining. It is obvious by these definitions that a factual determination must be made in each individual case as to whether certain employees fall within these categories or not. Once this determination is made by the Commission our authority is limited to a determination of whether there has been a departure from the essential requirements of law and whether there is competent substantial evidence to support the determination.

The Winter Park fire department consists of a Chief, Deputy Chief, Fire Marshall, three captains, three lieutenants, and 29 other employees. In the previous collective bargaining agreement of the parties the captains and lieutenants were included in the same unit with the other employees. On the question of being included with the other employees this time, the officers voted 4-0 in favor of inclusion. Extensive testimony was taken in the proceedings below as to the duties and responsibilities of the captains and lieutenants.3 Our examination of that record confirms the existence of competent substantial evidence to support the Commission’s conclusion that the officers are not excluded, as managerial or confidential employees, from the bargaining unit. We find no departure from the requirements of law in the Commission’s order for a self determination election by the captains and lieutenants.4

Accordingly, the petition for review is denied.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and MAGER and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

1

. § 447.203(4).

2

. § 447.203(5).

3

. There are four volumes of testimony consisting of 932 pages.

4

. § 447.307.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/25

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.50 N 76.81 W Meters AGL
EXHIBIT 32


<PAGE>

                            Certification Pursuant To
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     This  certification is provided  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, and accompanies  the Quarterly  Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 of EPIC ENERGY RESOURCES, Inc. (the
Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report).

     Rex Doyle,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  and Michael  Kinney,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Act of 1934; and
(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  November 7, 2008                       /s/ Rex Doyle
                                              -------------------------
                                              Rex Doyle
                                              Chief Executive Officer


                                              /s/ Michael Kinney
                                              -------------------------
                                              Michael Kinney
                                              Chief Financial Officer and
                                                Principal Accounting Officer
**List by Subject: Trade IssuesReports are indicated with the symbol Datasets are marked with the symbol 
Agricultural Trade Between Asia/Near East Countries and the U.S. (ERS)Agricultural Trade Policies (NASS)Agricultural Trade of Former Soviet Republics (ERS)Agriculture and Trade: Europe (ERS)DWOPSIM (ERS)Estimates of Producer and Consumer Subsidy Equivalents (ERS)Former Soviet Union Inter-Republic Trade (ERS)Global Competitive Advantages (ERS)High-Value Export Indexes (ERS)International Agriculture and Trade Situation and Outlook Reports (ERS)NAFTA: Monthly Trade and Economic Database (ERS)Outlook for U.S. Agricultural Exports (ERS)PL480 & Other Concessional U.S. Exports (ERS)PS & D VIEW (ERS)Processed Food Export and Import Values (ERS)Processed Food Trade Data (ERS)Producer and Consumer Subsidy Equivalents (ERS)Real and Nominal Exchange Rates (ERS)SWOPSIM '92 (ERS)SWOPSIM Database (ERS)U.S. Agricultural Trade (ERS)U.S. Agricultural Trade Update (ERS)U.S. Fresh Market Fruit Exports (ERS)U.S. Live Cattle Imports (ERS)U.S. Markets for Caribbean Basin Fruits & Vegetables (ERS)U.S. Trade Data (ERS)U.S./Mexico Fruit and Vegetable Trade (ERS)U.S./USSR Agricultural and Total Trade (ERS)USSR Agricultural Trade Data (ERS)USSR Agricultural and Total Trade (ERS)WATI/TS-VIEW (ERS)World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WAOB)World Agricultural Trade Flows (ERS)USDA Economics and Statistics System
**
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40756 Conference Calendar

LEO L. PITTMAN ET AL., Plaintiffs, LEO L. PITTMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus SHERMAN B. HALL, JR.; EMORY J. SHERIFF OF BRAZORIA COUNTY, Sheriff; DAVID HEAD, County Commissioner; JACK PATTERSON, County Commissioner; JAMES C. LAWSON, County Commissioner; RICHARD DIX, Captain, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-97-CV-167

-------------------- December 15, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Leo L. Pittman, TDCJ #718254, appeals the dismissal of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights suit as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Pittman fails to properly brief any issues for appeal, and, thus, all issues are waived. See Hidden Oaks Ltd. v. City of Austin , 138 F.3d 1036, 1045 n.6 (5th Cir.No. 99-40756 -2- 1998); Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Pittman is warned that the dismissal of his claim by the district court as frivolous counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 1996) (“[D]ismissals as frivolous in the district courts or the court of appeals count [as strikes] for the purposes of [§ 1915(g)].”). We caution Pittman that once he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
AFFIRMED. SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.