alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The MIAMI HERALD PUBLISHING COMPANY and John H. Payne, Appellants, v. Judith M. PAYNE, Appellee.

No. 76-1167.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 19, 1978.

Steel, Hector, Davis and Joseph P. Klock, Jr., Miami, Francis E. Holden, Jr., Hialeah, for appellants.

Robert M. Brake, Coral Gables, for appel-lee.

Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and NATHAN,. JJ.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on March 8, 1977 affirming the order of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida in the above styled cause; and

WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed March 9, 1978 (358 So.2d 541) and mandate now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment, 345 So.2d 730;

*123NOW, THEREFORE, It is Ordered that the judgment of this court filed March 8, 1977 is vacated and the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, the order of the trial court appealed herein is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16(b), Florida Appellate Rules).
**Agricultural Commodity Output (91008)**
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
   THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM PHOENIX
   GOLD  INTERNATIONAL,  INC.'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED  IN ITS ANNUAL
   REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL  YEAR  ENDING  SEPTEMBER  24,  2000 AND IS
   QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                   1

<S>                                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              SEP-24-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                   SEP-24-2000
<CASH>                                                          1,653,683
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   4,170,885
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                                     5,744,860
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               12,113,477
<PP&E>                                                          4,919,517
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  4,112,378
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 13,954,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           1,741,576
<BONDS>                                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<COMMON>                                                        6,550,928
<OTHER-SE>                                                      4,803,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   13,954,202
<SALES>                                                        27,339,549
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               27,339,549
<CGS>                                                          19,779,261
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  19,779,261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                5,952,897
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 1,658,611
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     (658,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             1,000,611
 <DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    1,000,611
<EPS-BASIC>                                                           .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         .33






</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

STATEMENT OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350 

        I,Peter C. Chang, the chief executive officer of Alliance Fiber Optic Products, Inc. (the“Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge, 

    (i)                 the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended          September 30, 2005 (the “Report”), fully complies with the          requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

    (ii)                 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alex Werber, the Chief Financial Officer of Tissera, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
      ended April 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Dated: June 17, 2004

                                        By: /s/Alex Werber
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Name: Alex Werber
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 11

          BALLARD MEDICAL PRODUCTS

          COMPUTATION OF INCOME PER COMMON SHARE AND
          COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE FOR THE THREE YEARS
          IN THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                       Cumulative    Period     Average         Net    Income
                           Shares      Out-      Shares       Income      Per
                                   Standing                             Share
        
         <S>       <C>                  <C>  <C>         <C>           <C>

         Primary
         income
         per
         share:

         1996      10,444,159,640       365  28,614,136  $25,603,039   $0.895

         1995      10,163,100,515       365  27,844,111   20,942,616   $0.752

         1994       9,990,612,100       365  27,371,540   16,594,198    0.606

         Fully
         diluted
         income
         per
         share:

         1996      10,573,632,075       365  28,968,855  $25,603,039   $0.844

         1995      10,344,080,290       365  28,339,946   20,942,616    0.739

         1994      10,023,886,230       365  27,462,702   16,594,198    0.604
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer
of First Century Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that to such officers knowledge, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|       |  |               
|------ |  | --------------
|Dated: |  | March 25, 2011



/s/ Frank W. WilkinsonFrank W. WilkinsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.
# Small business, acquisition professionals share successes

/ Published April 19, 2018
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, DLA Small Business ProgramsDLA AcquisitionSocioeconomic programs
Exhibit 32.2 

STATEMENT OF ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350 

    I, Anita K. Ho, the acting chief financial officer of Alliance  Fiber Optic  Products,  Inc.  (the  "Company"),  certify for thepurposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,
    (i)                 the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended          September 30, 2004 (the “Report”), fully complies with the          requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

    (ii)                 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
   By           /s/ Anita K. Ho                                        Anita K. Ho   November 10, 2004
# L_2005279EN.01007001.xml

| 22.10.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 279/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 279/70

---

DECISION OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES

of 14 October 2005

appointing an advocate general to the Court of Justice of the European Communities

(2005/741/EC, Euratom)

THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 223 thereof, and Articles 5, 7 and 8 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 139 thereof,

Whereas:

As a consequence of the resignation of Mr Francis JACOBS, an advocate general should be appointed for the remainder of his term of office,

HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Ms Eleanor SHARPSTON is hereby appointed advocate general to the Court of Justice of the European Communities from the date of her swearing in until 6 October 2009.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 14 October 2005.

The President

J. GRANT

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 166 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 166

 To amend the Oregon Resource Conservation Act of 1996 to reauthorize 
 the participation of the Bureau of Reclamation in the Deschutes River 
                  Conservancy, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 25, 2005

 Mr. Smith (for himself and Mr. Wyden) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Oregon Resource Conservation Act of 1996 to reauthorize 
 the participation of the Bureau of Reclamation in the Deschutes River 
                  Conservancy, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Deschutes River Conservancy 
Reauthorization Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PARTICIPATION OF BUREAU OF RECLAMATION IN 
              DESCHUTES RIVER CONSERVANCY.

    Section 301 of the Oregon Resource Conservation Act of 1996 
(division B of Public Law 104-208; 110 Stat. 3009-534) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Deschutes River 
                Basin Working Group'' and inserting ``Deschutes River 
                Conservancy Working Group''; and
                    (B) by striking paragraph (5) and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(5) Quorum.--The term `quorum' means 8 of those qualified 
        Working Group members appointed and eligible to serve.'';
            (2) in subsection (b)(3), by inserting before the period at 
        the end the following: ``, and up to a total amount of 
        $2,000,000 during each of fiscal years 2006 through 2015''; and
            (3) in subsection (h), by inserting before the period at 
        the end the following: ``, and $2,000,000 for each of fiscal 
        years 2006 through 2015''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Arthur DAVIS.

No. 61552.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 28, 1978.

Patrick J. Costa, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Louise Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# New medical supplies contract will save warfighter, taxpayer millions

/ Published April 6, 2017
PHILADELPHIA, 

Stretching a dollar just got easier for U.S. military medical personnel across the globe.

Acquisition professionals at Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support are implementing a new medical and surgical prime vendor program, which is projected to save $168 million over 10 years.

A prime vendor is a single distributor that provides consolidated ordering and delivery of brand-specific medical supplies from multiple manufacturers at prices predetermined as fair and reasonable.

Maryann DiMeo manages the contracting team that helped ensure the medical and surgical prime vendor program remained a good deal for the warfighter and the taxpayer. She said the team performed an exhaustive evaluation of vendor pricing. And when needed, they negotiated with the vendors to achieve the best value.

“They really did a good job getting those prices down,” DiMeo said.

Contracting officer David Zarenkiewicz, a member of DiMeo’s team, said it took a lot of teamwork and collaboration to make the new program more efficient than its predecessor.

“So often in the media, you hear about government waste,” he said. “I’m glad we made the right decisions and fought the right fights, which are always necessary to avoid waste.”

Zarenkiewicz said developing the new prime vendor program, which has a maximum value of $13 billion, was a new experience.

“I’ve worked so many contracts, but nothing of this magnitude before,” he said.

One of the challenges inherent in such a large contract is justifying decisions to DLA’s internal review process. He said the internal review was work-intensive at times, but he knows why it’s in place.

“When you are planning to spend this much of our taxpayers’ money, there is a need to have a lot of oversight, and I completely understand that,” Zarenkiewicz said. “We saved the taxpayers so much money. It’s a great feeling.”

While the new prime vendor contracts were awarded Feb. 2, DiMeo said her team still has plenty to keep them busy before the new program officially begins in June.

“On our end, it’s all about what the duck is doing under the water,” DiMeo said. “There’s a lot going on behind the scenes.”

She said her team must visit customers to provide training, establish customer accounts in the new system and establish more than 1,000 administration contracts to support the electronic ordering system.

However, DiMeo said all the hard work has its rewards.

“It’s a fabulous feeling to know that you’re giving the warfighter what they need, and you’re also saving the taxpayer’s money.”

***Editor Note: Photo removed.***
In th e S u p re m e Co u rt o f Ge o rg ia

De c id e d: No v e m be r 2 , 2 0 1 5

S 1 6 Y0 0 3 9 . IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL L. TERRELL.

P ER CURIAM.

Th is d isc ip lin a ry ma tte r is b e fo re th e Co u rt p u rsu an t to a p e titio n fo r

v o lu n ta ry su rre n d e r o f lic e n se file d b y R e sp on de n t Mic h a e l L. Te rre ll (S ta te Ba r

No

. 14 3 1 7 9 ) p u rsu a n t to Ba r Ru le 4 -2 2 7 (b ) b e f o r e t h e i s su a n c e of a fo rm a l

c o m p la in t. In h is p e titio n

, Te rre ll a d m its th a t h e a g re e d to re p re se nt a c lie n t in

a p e rso n a l in

ju ry c a se ; th a t h e re c e iv e d a $ 1 0 0 ,0 00 c h e c k in F e b ru a ry 2 0 1 3 fro m

a n in su ra n c e c o m

pa n y in se ttle m e n t o f th e c lie n t’s c la im s; th a t th e c h e c k wa s

m a d e p a y a

b le to th e c lie n t a n d Th e Te r re ll La w F irm ; th a t h e d e p osite d th e

c h e c k in to h is a tto rn e y tru st a c c o u n t ; a n d th a t h e fa ile d to re n d e r a fu ll

a c c o u n t i n g to h is c lie n t re g a rd in g th e fu n d s de sp ite h e r re q u e st th a t h e d o so

.

Te rre ll a lso a d m its th a t h e w a s p ro p e rly se rv e d with a No tic e o f In v e stig a tio n

with re g a rd to th is m a tte r; th a t h e fa ile d to re sp o n d th e re to ; th a t h e wa s

su sp e n d e d o n a n in te rim b a sis o n Ju n e 3 0

, 2 0 1 5

, a s a re su lt o f th a t fa ilu re ; a n d

th a t h e re m a in s su sp e n de d to d a te

. Te rre ll a d m its th a t he h a s v io la te d Ru le 1 .1 5(I) (c ) a n d 9 .3 o f th e Ge org ia Ru le s of P ro fe ssio n a l Co n d u c t, se e Ba r Ru le 4 -1 0 2

(d ), a n d re q u e s t s t h a t, a s a p p ro p ria te d isc ip lin e

, th is C o u rt a c c e p t a v o lu n ta ry

su rre nd e r o f h is lic e n se to p ra c ti c e l a w

, w h ic h h e re c o g n iz e s is ta n ta m o u n t to

d isb a rm e n t. Th e B a r h a s re sp o n d e d

, a sse rtin g its be lie f th a t it is in th e b e st

in te re sts o f th e Ba r a n d th e p u b l i c f o r t h e Su p re m e Co u rt to a c c e p t Te rre ll’s

p e titio n

.

We ha v e re v ie we d th e re c o rd a n d a g re e to a c c e p t T e rre ll’s p e titio n fo r th e

v o lu n ta ry su rre n d e r o f h is lic e n se

. Ac c o rd in g ly

, th e n a m e o f Mic h a e l L. Te rre ll

h e re b y is re m o v e d fro m th e ro lls o f p e rso n s e ntitle d to p ra c tic e la w in th e S ta te

o f Ge o rg ia . Te rre ll is re m in de d o f h is d u tie s u n de r Ba r Ru le 4 -2 1 9 (c ).

Vo lu n ta ry su rre nd e r o f lic e n se a c c e pte d . All th e Ju stic e s c o n c u r.

2
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 17

- 00368

- CR

M ICHAEL R AY W ATERS

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 432nd District Court

of Tarrant C ounty (1464942R)

December 13, 2018

Opinion by Justice Pittman

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

co urt is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Mark T. Pittman

_________________ Justice Mark T. Pittman
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Duane DOUGLAS.

No. 61618.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 28, 1978.

R. Judge Eames, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ossie B. Brown, Dist. Atty., Marilyn C. Castle, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1689 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1689

  To state the policy of the United States on international taxation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 2005

    Mr. Kyl (for himself, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Santorum, and Mr. Coburn) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                     Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To state the policy of the United States on international taxation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF UNITED STATES POLICY ON INTERNATIONAL TAXATION.

    (a) United States Policy.--
            (1) In general.--It is the policy of the United States to 
        use the voice, vote, and influence of the United States to 
        vigorously oppose any international or global tax that is or 
        may be considered or promoted by the United Nations, its 
        specialized or affiliated agencies, or its Member States, or by 
        nongovernmental organizations recognized by the United Nations.
            (2) Exception.--The policy in paragraph (1) shall not apply 
        to fees for publications or other types of fees that are not 
        tantamount to a tax on a United States person.
    (b) Efforts Regarding Policy.--The United States Representatives to 
the United Nations shall--
            (1) use the voice, vote, and influence of the United States 
        to vigorously oppose any effort by the United Nations, or any 
        specialized or affiliated agency of the United Nations, to 
        fund, approve, advocate, or promote any proposal concerning the 
        imposition of a tax or fee on any United States person in order 
        to raise revenue for the United Nations or any such agency; and
            (2) declare that a United States person shall not be 
        subject to any international tax, and shall not be required to 
        pay such tax if such tax is levied against such person.
    (c) Person Defined.--In this section, the term ``person'' has the 
meaning given such term in section 7701(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(1)).
                                 <all>
```