alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2023209EN.01000101.xml

| 24.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 209/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 209/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/1653

of 17 August 2023

entering a name in the register of geographical indications for spirit drinks (‘Borzag pálinka’)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2019/787 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the definition, description, presentation and labelling of spirit drinks, the use of the names of spirit drinks in the presentation and labelling of other foodstuffs, the protection of geographical indications for spirit drinks, the use of ethyl alcohol and distillates of agricultural origin in alcoholic beverages, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 (1), and in particular Article 30(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 26(2) of Regulation (EU) 2019/787, Hungary’s application to register the name ‘Borzag pálinka’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 26(2) of Regulation (EU) 2019/787, Hungary’s application to register the name ‘Borzag pálinka’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | No notice of opposition has been received by the Commission under Article 27(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/787. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

No notice of opposition has been received by the Commission under Article 27(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/787.

| (3) | The name ‘Borzag pálinka’ should therefore be registered as a geographical indication, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The name ‘Borzag pálinka’ should therefore be registered as a geographical indication,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The geographical indication ‘Borzag pálinka’ is hereby entered in the register. This Regulation grants the geographical indication ‘Borzag pálinka’ the protection referred to in Article 21 of Regulation (EU) 2019/787, in accordance with Article 30(4) of that Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 August 2023.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 130, 17.5.2019, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 156, 3.5.2023, p. 23.

2

---
79–008 

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 111–6 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 1) MAKING SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR JOB PRESERVATION AND CREATION, INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT, ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND SCIENCE, ASSISTANCE TO THE UNEMPLOYED, AND STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL STABILIZATION, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2009, AND 

FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

JANUARY 26, 2009.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Ms. SLAUGHTER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 88] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 88, by a non-record vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 1, the ‘‘American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.’’ The resolution provides 3.5 hours of general debate equally divided and controlled by 

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Appropriations, who may yield control of blocks of that time. 

The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of 

the bill except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. Finally, the resolution provides that the Committee of the Whole 

shall rise without motion after general debate and that no further 

consideration of the bill shall occur except pursuant to a subsequent order of the House. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the bill 

(except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI) includes a 

waiver of section 303 of the Congressional Budget Act (prohibiting 

consideration of legislation creating new budget authority before 

the concurrent resolution on the budget has been agreed to). 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with REPORTS
#### Edward L. DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. DD-39.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 29, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 13, 1977.

Frank E. Sheffield, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

SMITH, Judge.

A co-defendant’s statement incriminating herself and Davis was received in evidence in their joint trial, over Davis’ objection. Although the statement contained hearsay inadmissible against Davis, his counsel knew of the statement long before the trial and made no motion for severance until the trial was well under way. The motion for severance was untimely under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.153,1 but the trial court had discretion under the same rule to entertain the motion, which the court here did. Davis here contends that, having heard or “entertained” the motion in *206midtrial, the court was powerless to do other than require the State then to elect as between (a) withdrawing its offer of the statement, (b) deleting its references to Davis, which would have excised significantly incriminating admissions by the declarant, or (c) severing Davis for another trial. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.152(b)(2). See *Davis v. State,*226 So.2d 257 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969).

Considering the untimeliness of the motion, the absence of circumstances mitigating its untimeliness, the absence of a practical way to excise the statement’s references to Davis without significantly detracting from admissible evidence against the declarant, and the independent evidence incriminating Davis much as did the hearsay, we find no reversible error. The jury was charged to consider the statement as evidence against the declarant only. To force other alternative dispositions on the trial court as a consequence of listening to the tardy motion would do no more than discourage “entertainment” of meritorious motions. An impermeable consciousness is not a judicial attribute. Unquestionably there are circumstances in which Rule 3.152(b)(2) requires a choice between its three alternative remedies even when the motion is late, but the trial court does not become bound to them, irrespective of other considerations, merely by hearing a tardy motion in midtrial. *Bruton v. United States,*391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968) contemplates a pretrial motion for severance as the appropriate means for obtaining the relief sought, and does not require a different result.

Davis’ other points are without merit.

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and RAWLS, J., concur.

1

. “(a) A defendant’s motion for severance of multiple offenses or defendants . . , shall be made before trial unless opportunity therefor did not exist or the defendant was not aware of the grounds for such a motion but the court in its discretion may entertain such a motion at the trial.”
No. 8871.

#### The Pennslyvania Company *v.*Ellsworth.

(Decided March 13, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Crawford county.

*Messrs. Wheeler £ Bentley,*for plaintiff in error.

*444
      *Mr. T. E. Powell*and *Mr. J. W. Coulter,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

.Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.

Crew, J., dissents.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 152 (Thursday, August 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20781]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[AK-962-1410-00-P]


Notice for Publication; [AA-9249]; Alaska Native Claims Selection

    In accordance with Departmental regulation 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice 
is hereby given that a decision to issue conveyance under the 
provisions of Sec. 14(h)(1) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act 
of December 18, 1971, 43 U.S.C. 1601, 1613(h)(1), will be issued to 
Calista Corporation for approximately 0.21 acre. The lands involved are 
in the vicinity of Nunivak Island, Alaska.

Seward Meridian, Alaska

T. 3 S., R. 95 W.,
    Sec. 10.

    A notice of the decision will be published once a week, for four 
(4) consecutive weeks, in the Anchorage Daily News. Copies of the 
decision may be obtained by contacting the Alaska State Office of the 
Bureau of Land Management, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99513-7599 ((907) 271-5960).
    Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected 
by the decision, an agency of the Federal government or regional 
corporation, shall have until September 8, 1997 to file an appeal. 
However, parties receiving service by certified mail shall have 30 days 
from the date of receipt to file an appeal. Appeals must be filed in 
the Bureau of Land Management at the address identified above, where 
the requirements for filing an appeal may be obtained. Parties who do 
not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR part 
4, subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.
Patricia A. Baker,
Land Law Examiner, ANCSA Team, Branch of 962 Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 97-20781 Filed 8-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
# Troop Support helps Airmen transition to new uniform from S.C. to Italy  

/ Published Oct. 4, 2018
AVIANO AIR BASE, Italy, 
Six hours ahead of the Eastern time zone, airmen at Aviano Air Base, Italy were the first to purchase the Operational Camouflage Pattern utility uniform Oct. 1 ahead of their U.S. counterparts.

Airmen from the 31st Fighter Wing began waiting in line almost two hours before the Army and Air Force Exchange Service sales store opened to purchase the new uniform, said Air Force Maj. Blake Johnson, Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Europe and Africa operations officer.

“The enthusiasm was very high as airmen waiting in line said that they were eager to make the transition,” Johnson said. 

More than 17,000 uniforms were delivered to five military clothing sales stores Oct. 1: Aviano Air Base, Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina, the Pentagon, Washington, D.C., Joint Base Charleston, South Carolina and MacDill AFB, Florida.

Airmen will wear the OCP utility uniform currently worn by the Army. Previously, most Airmen only wore the uniform during deployments.

Prior to opening, Johnson gathered feedback from Airmen waiting for the new uniform. Some said they were ready for the “cooler” look of the uniform, while others looked forward to wearing the same uniform at home and during deployments. 

“Everyone agreed that it was more comfortable and functional as well,” Johnson said.

DLA Troop Support's Clothing and Textiles supply chain worked with its Air Force counterparts and other key stakeholders since April to ensure the first wave of the roll-out went smoothly, customer cell chief for Air Force recruit clothing David James said.

“This will be the first step in a 30-month process to outfit the entire Air Force,” James said. “So far we’ve received positive feedback from our customers. Airmen are excited about the change.” 

The general manager for AAFES Italy Consolidated Exchange, Susana Sorbrino, said that she was pleased with the support her stores received from the DLA Troop Support team tracking and filling orders.

“The amazing efforts and planning from the team made possible to realize in one single day the sales normally achieved for the entire month,” Sobrino said.

Approximately 500 Air Force customers purchased $51,688 worth of uniforms provided by DLA at the Aviano sales store, Sobrino said. By set, the total cost of the coat, trousers and cap is $104.

DLA Troop Support will continue to work with the Air Force on a phased roll-out plan, James said. The mandatory wear date for all airmen is April 1, 2021.
#### Clyde J. MIRE et al. v. CHEVRON OIL COMPANY et al.

No. 61600.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 24, 1978.

In re: Clyde J. Mire, et al, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of *257Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Arcadia. 353 So.2d 462.

Writ denied.

TATE, J.,

dissents. The 1965 act did not create a new servitude. Therefore the original 1957 servitude was extinguished by non-user in 1967.
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trenwick Group Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan L.
Hunte, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18, U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Alan L. Hunte

Alan L. Hunte
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of RB Rubber Products, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended April 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory J. Divis, Director and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/GREGORY J. DIVISGregory J. Divis Director and
PresidentRB Rubber Products, Inc.
August 22, 2002 |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
#### Willie WASHINGTON and Helen McGee v. DIXIE LEASING OF NEW ORLEANS, INC., Craig Coleman and Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

No. 61369.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1978.

In re: Willie Washington and Helen McGee applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 352 So.2d 363.

Denied.

TATE, DIXON and CALOGERO, JJ., would grant.
# DLA Distribution Commanding General's MLK Day Message

/ Published Jan. 15, 2018

DLA Distribution Team,
On Monday, 15 January 2018, we will celebrate the life and the lasting contributions of one of humanity’s most incredibly remarkable leaders ... Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.  

Dr. King was a caring, compassionate, and courageous leader whose deeds and actions continue serving as a great example of hope, love, and moral strength.  He devoted his life to the betterment of the world around him and his legacy endures because of his incredibly powerful message and the methods by which he chose to attain his ideals.  

Dr. King said, "Life's most persistent and urgent question is: What are you doing for others?” and I’d ask that we all take a moment to reflect on this question.  I encourage each of us to take the day’s theme “A Day On, Not a Day Off” to heart and consider taking time to make a positive difference within your community.  It is through our service to others that we will honor the quest of Dr. King’s great dream.  For ideas on how to give back, please visit http://www.nationalservice.gov/serve-your-community to find opportunities to volunteer.

Ms. Gonzales and I thank you for the phenomenal work you do every day.  Your hard work and dedication do not go unnoticed as we collectively sustain the Warfighter around the globe.  We are proud to be on this great DLA Distribution team.

Regards,

BG John S. Laskodi

Commanding General

DLA Distribution

DLA Distribution - Right Things....at the Right Place, at the Right Time!

Warfighter First!
**Tobacco Statistics (94012)**
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 176 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 411
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 176

                          [Report No. 109-681]

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2005

            Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

                           September 26, 2006

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
             hydroelectric project in the State of Alaska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 
              PROJECT.

    Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 11480, the 
Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the project, and 
after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due 
diligence, and public interest requirements of that section and the 
Commission's procedures under that section extend the time period 
during which the licensee is required to commence the construction of 
the project for 3 consecutive 2-year periods beyond the date that is 4 
years after the date of issuance of the license.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 411

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 176

                          [Report No. 109-681]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
             hydroelectric project in the State of Alaska.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 26, 2006

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00376-CV

Richard A. Lapides, Appellant

v.

Timothy A. Stark, Appellee

FROM THE JUSTICE COURT PRECINCT 3 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. J3-CV-18-067373, SYLVIA HOLMES, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

On June 3, 2019, Richard A. Lapides filed with this Court a document titled 

“Summary of Defendant’s Position for Appeal from Judgment in the Justice Court, Precinct 

Three, Travis County.” On June 11, 2019, the Clerk of this Court notified Lapides that it 

appeared that this Court lacked jurisdiction over this matter and requested a response explaining 

how this Court may exercise jurisdiction. Lapides filed a response on June 17, 2019, in a 

companion case, this Court’s cause number 03-19-00377-CV, but he has failed to explain how 

this Court has jurisdiction. The county court has jurisdiction over appeals from justice court. 

See Tex. R. Civ. P. 506.1–506.4. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 42.3(a).
2

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: June 26, 2019
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Samuel P. LOVE, Jr.

No. 60971.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1977.

In re: Samuel P. Love, Jr. applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Application denied; there is no error in the ruling of the trial judge.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed December 23, 2015.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14- 2519

Lower Tribunal Nos. 14-1709 & 1277362203

________________



### Hope Madu Onye,

Appellant,

vs.



### Department of Revenue o/b/o Johnnel E. Missick,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Martin Shapiro

, Judge.

Hope Madu Onye, in proper person.

No appearance, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, SALTER and LOGUE, JJ.

LOGUE, J.

We reverse the award of retroactive child support because the record is

silent as to whether the former husband and the former wife resided together withthe children during the period of retroa ctivity. See Motie v. Motie

, 132 So. 3d

1210, 1214-15 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014); see also § 61.30(17), Fla. Stat. (2014). We

affirm the trial court’s order on all other grounds.

2
ADDENDUM B: Proposed CY 2013 ESRD PPS and Composite Rate Wage Indices 

for Rural Areas Based on CBSA Labor Market Areas

State 

Code Nonurban Area

ESRD PPS 

Wage Index

Composite Rate 

Wage Index

1 Alabama 0.7113 0.7124

2 Alaska 1.2836 1.2856

3 Arizona 0.9203 0.9217

4 Arkansas 0.7357 0.7368

5 California 1.2585 1.2604

6 Colorado 1.0228 1.0244

7 Connecticut 1.1153 1.1170

8 Delaware 1.0192 1.0208

10 Florida 0.8080 0.8092

11 Georgia 0.7411 0.7422

12 Hawaii 1.0502 1.0518

13 Idaho 0.7600 0.7612

14 Illinois 0.8436 0.8449

15 Indiana 0.8422 0.8435

16 Iowa 0.8340 0.8353

17 Kansas 0.8015 0.8027

18 Kentucky 0.7908 0.7920

19 Louisiana 0.7735 0.7747

20 Maine 0.8362 0.8375

21 Maryland 0.8816 0.8830

22 Massachusetts 1.3570 1.3591

23 Michigan 0.8352 0.8365

24 Minnesota 0.9073 0.9087

25 Mississippi 0.7540 0.7552

26 Missouri 0.7638 0.7650

27 Montana 0.8619 0.8632

28 Nebraska 0.8721 0.8734

29 Nevada 0.9754 0.9769

30 New Hampshire 1.0395 1.0411

31 New Jersey1----- -----

32 New Mexico 0.8899 0.8913

33 New York 0.8217 0.8230
CMS-1532-P

2

State 

Code Nonurban Area

ESRD PPS 

Wage Index

Composite Rate 

Wage Index

34 North Carolina 0.8236 0.8249

35 North Dakota 0.6906 0.6917

36 Ohio 0.8427 0.8440

37 Oklahoma 0.7800 0.7812

38 Oregon 0.9521 0.9536

39 Pennsylvania 0.8395 0.8408

40 Puerto Rico 0.5000 0.5008

41 Rhode Island1----- -----

42 South Carolina 0.8311 0.8324

43 South Dakota 0.8142 0.8155

44 Tennessee 0.7571 0.7583

45 Texas 0.7996 0.8008

46 Utah 0.8535 0.8548

47 Vermont 0.9746 0.9761

48 Virgin Islands 0.7201 0.7212

49 Virginia 0.7719 0.7731

50 Washington 1.0114 1.0130

51 West Virginia 0.7343 0.7354

52 Wisconsin 0.9162 0.9176

53 Wyoming 0.9259 0.9273

1 All counties within the State are classified as urban.
**Conservation Reserve Program Summary File (96004)**