alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA director retires after 38-year Air Force career  

/ Published May 5, 2017
Defense Logistics Agency Director Lt. Gen. Andy Busch marked the end of his 38-year Air Force career May 4 with a retirement ceremony at DLA Headquarters, Fort Belvoir, Virginia. Busch began serving as director of the agency Dec. 29, 2014.During his May 3 retirement luncheon, Busch received congratulations and well wishes from family, friends and colleagues. “Serving as director of DLA has been the highlight of my career,” Busch said.Busch earned his commission in 1979 as a graduate of the U.S. Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, Colorado. He began his Air Force career as an aircraft maintenance officer, serving in a variety of sortie production roles and commanding three maintenance squadrons and a maintenance wing.As a lieutenant colonel, Busch pivoted toward logistics with the first of three assignments at DLA. For three years starting in 1995, he served as chief of Weapons Systems Readiness Teams and executive officer of materiel management at DLA Headquarters.Busch’s second assignment with the agency came in 2007 when, as a brigadier general, he served two years as commander of DLA Aviation in Richmond, Virginia. DLA Aviation is a DLA primary-level field activity and supplies repair parts and operating supply items for the nation’s military aircraft.As DLA director, Busch will be remembered for strengthening ties to warfighters and other important customers. He committed the agency to improving critical relationships with combatant commanders, warfighter commanders, government agency senior leaders, industry partners, coalition partners and other stakeholders.He made support to the nuclear enterprise a top priority, standing up the Nuclear Enterprise Support Office to improve and synchronize support to an area of the military he considered underserved.Busch initiated enhancements to DLA’s expeditionary capability by creating Global Response Force Rapid Deployment Teams, one of which deployed to Haiti, delivering disaster relief with great success in the aftermath of Hurricane Matthew.He also promoted workforce resiliency through a vigorous awareness campaign and established the agency’s first Sexual Assault Prevention and Reporting program. Speaking to Busch at his retirement luncheon, DLA Vice Director Ted Case said, “I feel safe in saying that DLA is in better shape now than when you arrived. You maintained the advancements of your predecessors while initiating improvements of your own. Your legacy will be one of solid vision and leadership, which will only grow over time.”Busch is DLA’s 18th director and the fifth to come from the ranks of the U.S. Air Force.
HIHtfJL 

# W^ ******M^At^n . ^aJ jt o^u i ^ny/n^^y,, „ ^ for $



### ^ /u^x p&^i° I/L'^v^jj, p^*^

_
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<MULTIPLIER>         1,000
              
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,427
<SECURITIES>                                     4,025
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,618
<PP&E>                                          74,052
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,397
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,558
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,289
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            53
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,549
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,558
<SALES>                                        125,997
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,057
<CGS>                                           98,156
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   98,156
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,579
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 721
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,621
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,817
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,784
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,784
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.29
        
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000723610
<NAME> STRATUS COMPUTER, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           91592
<SECURITIES>                                     63505
<RECEIVABLES>                                   170072
<ALLOWANCES>                                      8606
<INVENTORY>                                      61270
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                415243
<PP&E>                                          323529
<DEPRECIATION>                                  207148
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  607809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           122250
<BONDS>                                           7169
<COMMON>                                           259
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      478134
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    607809
<SALES>                                         383850
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                587922
<CGS>                                           187935
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   575855
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (9604)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  21672
<INCOME-TAX>                                      4334
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              17338
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     17338
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .73



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30334 Summary Calendar

LAWYER WINFIELD, JR.,
Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY,
Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-3596-E

-------------------- March 18, 2003
Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Lawyer Winfield, Jr., Louisiana prisoner # 83494, appeals

the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition
challenging the reasonable doubt jury instruc tion at his trial.

Win field argues that the jury instruction for reasonable doubt
given to the jury in his criminal trial was unconstitutional under

Cage v. Louisiana , 49 8 U.S. 39 (1990). He notes that the

instruction in his case contained all three phrases found
objectionable in Cage , i.e., “grave uncertainty,” “moralNo. 02-30334 -2-

certa inty,” and “substantial doubt,” as well as the articulation
requirement condemned in H umphrey v. Cain , 120 F.3d 526, 5 30-31
(5th Cir. 1997), adopted in relevant part , 138 F.3d 552 (5th Cir.
1998)(en banc).

Winfield’s reliance on Humphrey is misplaced. This court

cannot consider the “ar ticulation requirement” to be problematic

“as the Supreme Court has never expressed disfavor with such
language.” M ulheisen v. Ieyoub , 168 F.3d 8 40, 844 n.2 (5th Cir.

1999). The AEDPA allows application only of Supreme Court rulings.

See id

. ; 28 U.S.C. 2254(d)(1). Pursuant to § 2254(d), a federal

court must defer to a state court’s resolution of both pure questions of law and mixed questions of law and fact unless the
state court’s determination was “contrary to” or an “unreasonable
application” of clearly established fed eral law as determined by

the Supreme Court. S ee Hill v. Johnson , 210 F.3d 481, 485 (5th
Cir. 2000); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1).

Although Winfield’s instruction contained the three
problematic phr ases contained in the C age instruction and in the

unconstitutional instruction in Morris v. Cain , 186 F.3d 581 (5th

Cir. 1999), it also contained the alternative definition, “abiding

conviction” of the defendant’s guilt, which was lacking in both

Cage and Morris . This alternative definition of reasonable doubt
places Winfield’s instruction within the realm of the instructions

found suitable in Victor v. Nebraska , 511 U.S. 1, 14-16 (1994).
Accordingly, Winfield’s reasonable doubt instruction passesNo. 02-30334 -3-

constitutional muster. S ee id

. The state court’s denial of relief
on this claim was not contrary to clearly established federal law
as determined by the Supreme Court. 2254(d)(1).

AFFIRMED.
First Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS
FIRST AMENEMDNT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is dated as of November 9, 2015, by and between Health Insurance Innovations, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Patrick R. McNamee
(“Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, in connection with Executive’s promotion to Chief Executive Officer, Company and Executive desire
to modify the terms of that certain Employment Agreement by and between Company and Executive dated June 8, 2015 (the “Employment Agreement”). 

NOW, THEREFORE, for an in consideration of the mutual promises made herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Section 3(e)
of the Employment Agreement is deleted in its entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof: 
 “(e) On each annual anniversary
of the Effective Date, at the sole discretion of the Board, Executive will be eligible for a target equity grant under the LTI Plan equal to 100% of Executive’s Salary then in effect in SARs (as determined by the Black-Sholes option pricing
model), with a strike price equal to the market closing price of the Company’s Class A common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market (or such other national securities exchange on which such common stock is then traded) on the applicable grant
date. These annual grants of SARs, if awarded, will vest 25% on each of the first two anniversaries of the applicable grant date and 50% on the third anniversary of the applicable grant date. Annual awards of SARs under this Section 3.e
will be in substantially the same form, and contain substantially the same terms and conditions, as the SARA Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit B (or such other award agreement as is made applicable to other members of the Company’s senior
management).” 
 2. Except as specifically amended hereby, all terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect. 
 3. Capitalized terms used herein but not specifically defined herein shall, have the meanings ascribed to them in the
Employment Agreement. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first written
above. 
  

			
	“Company”
	
	HEALTH INSURANCE INNOVATIONS, INC.
		
	By:	 	     /s/ Michael D. Hershberger

		 	Michael D. Hershberger, CFO
	
	“Executive”
	
	   /s/ Patrick R. McNamee

	Patrick R. McNamee
#### Lee BRIGNAC et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Damon SOILEAU and Travelers Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 2708.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Third Circuit.

June 12, 1969.

Donald Soileau, Mamou, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Dubuisson & Dubuisson, by James G. Dubuisson, Opelousas, for defendants-ap-pellees.

Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY and CULPEP-PER, JJ.

SAVOY, Judge.

This is a companion case to Hersey Guil-lory, et al v. Damon Soileau and Travelers Insurance Company, rendered this date by this Court, reported at 224 So.2d 71.

For the reasons assigned in the Guillory case, supra, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. All costs of appeal are assessed against plaintiffs.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hartmarx Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Homi B. Patel, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 14, 2005



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|       |  | /s/ HOMI B. PATEL      
|Name:  |  | Homi B. Patel          
|Title: |  | Chairman, President and
|       |  | Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EX REL: STEPHEN JUICE, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

TAMMY FERGUSON, AS FACILITY MGR. 

SCI BENNER AND KURT LYNOTT ESQ., 

AS APPOINTED COUNSEL; AND 

HONORABLE MICHAEL BARRASSE, 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 72 MM 2016 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2016, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Motion to Recuse, the Motion for Leave to File 

a Reply, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus are DENIED. The Prothonotary is 

DIRECTED to strike the name of jurist from the caption.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          20,451
<SECURITIES>                                    54,994
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,714
<PP&E>                                           2,263
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,671
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,512
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,671
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,328
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (28,655)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,327
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,328)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.58)
        

</TABLE>
#### Gerdine WILLIAMS, a/k/a Jerry Williams, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. DD-492.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 12, 1978.

Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, and Theodore E. Mack, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Patti Englander, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of adjudication of guilt and resulting concurrent sentences for three charges of grand larceny. We have reviewed the record and find that as to two of the charges there is no reversible error and the evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction. However, as to case # 76-56 CF wherein appellant was convicted of grand larceny from one Margaret Danford we are of the view that appellant’s points are well taken and that as to that conviction not only was there prejudicial error but the totality of the evidence was insufficient to sustain conviction.

Accordingly, as to cases 77-629 CF and 76-17 CF we affirm. As to case 76-56 CF 23 we reverse.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and SMITH and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1445

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 520 Colorado Avenue in Arriba, Colorado,

as the ‘‘William H. Emery Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 1445 ES

1 SECTION 1. WILLIAM H. EMERY POST OFFICE.

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States

3 Postal Service located at 520 Colorado Avenue in Arriba,

4 Colorado, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘William

5 H. Emery Post Office’’.

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘William H. Emery

10 Post Office’’.

Passed the Senate March 3, 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1445

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office’’. Arriba, Colorado, as the ‘‘William H. Emery al Service located at 520 Colorado Avenue in
# National Guard engineers make their own path in Romania

/ Published May 8, 2017
CINCU, Romania, Rainy weather in early May is just another obstacle to overcome for the Soldiers of Resolute Castle 2017, an engineering exercise underway in Romania and Poland. When rain turned their roads to a slick muck, endangering the trucks hauling rock for the tank trails, the engineers built a new road to continue work and prevent future delays.For their three weeks of training in Romania, Soldiers of 124th Engineer Company, 122nd Engineer Battalion, South Carolina National Guard and 381st Engineer Company, 926th Engineer Battalion are working with Soldiers from Romania's 10th Engineer Brigade to build a Non-Standard Live-Fire Range at Joint National Training Center, Cincu, Romania. The range will have multiple lanes and fighting positions for NATO armored gunnery exercises.To support the tanks that will eventually rumble over its roads, the range requires a constant supply of rock. "It takes 150 truckloads per working day," said Capt. Darin Larson of 926th Engineer Brigade, officer-in-charge of the Cincu projects.That long line of civilian trucks ground to a halt as the rain began and their tires stuck in the mud. The engineers laid rip-rap as a road for the trucks, but the drivers, Romanian contractors from the area, were wary of the large rocks with their sharp edges. "They could easily pop a tire," said 1st Lt. Hillman Dorn, 124th Engineer Company, of Edgefield, South Carolina. With their front-end loaders, rollers and graders, the engineers compacted dirt, laid down a finer rock to cover the rip-rap, and graded the road. Eventually, the dump trucks began moving again.Engineers have to adapt to the terrain as they shape it. Earlier rotations invested a significant number of articulated concrete mats—concrete blocks joined by a flexible material—to support a low-water crossing before they could begin laying rock for the road. Once that access was established, they began clearing and grubbing out the dirt. "The first 8-12 inches is bio-matter and old roots that will make the road sink over time," Dorn said. "You have to cut it out, compact the dirt, and build the road up from there."As a platoon sergeant, Sgt. 1st Class Antonie Lott of Saluda, SC, 124th Engineer Company, has enjoyed the opportunity to work with Resolute Castle 17, a NATO initiative to increase shared operational understanding between soldiers at all levels of the armed forces and re-affirm member nations' commitment to their mutual safety and sovereign borders. "I like meeting new people and learning new things, and you do that here." He sees the challenges of weather and terrain as inconvenient, but also an opportunity to adapt and train his soldiers on other skills. "You do whatever you can, as the weather permits."*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the National Guard website.*
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Annual report**
 
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010
 
SuDoc Number:A 77.729/2:
Item Number:0026-A-64 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000632655
 
November 18, 2019