alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Troop Support commander recognizes employee excellence at awards ceremony

/ Published Dec. 22, 2017
PHILADELPHIA, 
The commander of Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support recognized 137 employees during a quarterly awards ceremony Dec. 19.

Army Brig. Gen. Mark Simerly presided over the ceremony recognizing outstanding employees’ accomplishments for the third and fourth quarters of 2017. 

“One thing that I’ve found in my time here at Troop Support,” Simerly said, “there is excellence all around us.”

Pamela Smith, a lead internal review evaluator for Troop Support, earned accolades for achieving more than 35 years of service as a federal employee. 

Smith was glad to see her leadership recognize the contributions of hard working employees who all work toward a shared goal.

“It’s all about the bottom line:  supporting the warfighter,” Smith said. 

The 137 awardees were recognized for achievements in the following categories:

JOINT SERVICE COMMENDATION MEDAL
      -  Maj. Latrina Lee 

JOINT SERVICE ACHIEVEMENT MEDAL
      -  Maj. Corinne Bell 

SUPERIOR CIVILIAN SERVICE AWARD
      -  Alicia Nichols-Harris 
      -  John Skillman 

DLA 50th ANNUAL EMPLOYEE AWARDS WINNERS

DLA STRATEGIC GOALS AWARD
      -  Michael Garfield 
      -  Henry Jansen 
      -  Rene King 

CAREER SERVICE AWARD - 40 YEARS
      -  Dallas Bucher 
      -  Thomas Dougherty Jr.  

CAREER SERVICE AWARD - 35 YEARS
      -  Kristina Dormer 
      -  Paul Parlett 
      -  Pamela Smith 

CAREER SERVICE AWARD - 30 YEARS
      -  Sabrina Morgan 
      -  Michelle Nieves 
      -  Vincent Valinotti 
      -  Shahid Wilds 

SUPERVISOR OF THE QUARTER
      -  Christine Hertkorn (third quarter) 
      -  David Lipshutz (fourth quarter) 

TEAM OF THE QUARTER
      -  Army Recruit Training Team, Clothing and Textiles (third quarter) 
      -  Medical Contingency Contracting Team (fourth quarter) 

EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH
      -  Shannon Frady (May) 
      -  Steven Herrera (June) 
      -  Lynne DeSanto (July) 
      -  John Patkus (August) 
      -  Tamala Jackson (September) 
      -  Leonard Shannon (October) 
      -  Dana Heil (November) 

CERTIFICATES OF APRECIATION
      -  Bruce Donnelly, Federal Emergency Management Agency Surge Capacity Force Deployment volunteer 
      -  Department of Defense Performance Management and Appraisal Program Facilitators 
      -  Troop Support Academy Coordinators 
      -  Children’s Holiday Party Volunteers
# Troop Support retirees honored for 68 years of combined service

/ Published Sept. 28, 2018
PHILADELPHIA, 
Two Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support employees were recognized for their 68 years of combined service during a retirement ceremony Sept. 26 in Philadelphia.

Anita Parker, a lead procurement analyst with the Procurement Process Support office, retired with 34 years of service. Philip DiBabbo, a business specialist with Medical, also retired with 34 years of service.

Army Brig. Gen. Mark Simerly, DLA Troop Support commander, presided over the ceremony. He expressed his gratitude for the retirees’ support of the warfighter and noted their impact on Troop Support.

“You are both a part of the rich legacy of support and excellent reputation that Troop Support has built ... for that I am truly grateful,” Simerly said.

Parker first entered federal service in 1984 at the Defense Personnel Support Center, a legacy organization of DLA Troop Support, as a contract specialist in the Medical pharmaceutical division. She is retiring from her current position as a team lead for the contract quality review program and warrant reviews. 

Parker said that she’ll miss her team, especially that “wonderful group of people” she’s worked and traveled with for the last 17 years.

She looks forward to taking time in her retirement to improve herself mentally, physically and spiritually.

DiBabbo entered federal service in 1975 as a Summer Aid - Supply Clerk at the Naval Finance Office and Internal Revenue Service Mid-Atlantic Region. He joined DLA in 1985 as a supply clerk with the Defense Personnel Support Center’s Medical supply chain. He retires from his current position as a business specialist in the medical/surgical division. 

He said the team he is retiring from in Medical has felt “like a family.” He urged all employees to be proud of their support of the nation. And he said that all of his memories of DLA were positive, but he’ll enjoy the autonomy of retirement. 

“I’m looking forward to doing what I want to do, enjoying life more and just me being the boss,” DiBabbo said. 
DiBabbo’s retirement plans include traveling and joining a gym.
#### Keith M. JONES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-2279.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 12, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Karen M. Gottlieb, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Calvin L. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellee brings this motion to dismiss, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.300, seeking to have this court dismiss appellant’s appeal filed on October 20, 1977. The appeal was from an order dated September 20, 1977, revoking appellant’s probation and immediately sentencing him to three years in the state penitentiary. Subsequent to the filing of his appeal, appellant escaped from custody of the Opa Locka Community Correctional Center on May 1, 1978, during the pendency of his appeal. Appellant’s present whereabouts are unknown to the Department of Offender Rehabilitation.

Appellee urges as grounds for its motion to dismiss that, because appellant is a fugitive from justice while his appeal is pending, the appeal should be dismissed. As authority, appellee cites *Bretti v. Wainwright,*225 So.2d 516 (Fla.1969); *Woodson v. State,*19 Fla. 549 (1882); *Mitchell v. State,*294 So.2d 395 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); *Bretti v. State,*210 So.2d 472 (Fla.3d DCA 1968); and *Decree v. State,*180 So.2d 667 (Fla.lst DCA 1965). Compare *Marshall v. State,*344 So.2d 646 (Fla.3d DCA 1977). Neither appellant nor his counsel have responded to the instant motion.

We agree with appellee’s argument set forth in its motion to dismiss this appeal; accordingly, the motion to dismiss is granted.

Granted.
Executive	Helijet	Charters	LLC

Jeremy	Bass/Celeste	Rubbo 3231	Victory	St.	Hangar	328 Myrtle	Beach,	SC	29577 May	15,	2013 Executive Helijet Charters LLC respectfully requests an exemption in accordance with the FAA's requirements established under 14 CFR part 11, § 11.61 - 11.101. This exemption would allow Executive Helijet Charters LLC and Executive Helicopters Inc. to combine under one testing program. The Exemption do es not set precedent, and any delay in acting on this ext ension is problematic to Executive Helijet Charters LLC and Executive Helicopters Inc

. An Exemption of this nature is similar to Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (Solid Edge 91.147 air tour operations

– equival ent level of safety & unnecessary burden to conduct two separate testing programs). Approval of this exemption is in the public interest as it reduces the cost to customers and availability of air transportation in Executive Helijet Charters LLC areas of operation and it would not adversely affect safety in anyway. Conditions & Limitations: 1. Employees are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 2. The drug and alcohol -testing progra m must be implemente d under the auspices of Helijet Charters LLC, part 135 operations. Thank you for your consideration. Jeremy Bass Celeste Rubbo President Vice President/DER 843 -333 - 1655 843 - 333 - 1655
#### A. A. DeLORENZO & ASSOCIATES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. ERIC’S SWISS PRODUCTS, INC., a corporation, Appellee.

No. L-274.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Feb. 5, 1970.

W. O. Birchfield, of Milam, Ramsay, Martin & Ade, Jacksonville, for appellant.

George Gabel, Jr., of Kurz, Toole, Taylor & Moseley, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error,. the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
CNET Price comparisons Product reviewsTech newsDownloads

|  |
|--|
| Search Download.comIn GamesIn WindowsIn DownloadsAll CNET    The Web | Free MSN ToolbarDownload Now |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|  |  |  |
|--|--|--|
|  |  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|--|
|  |  |
|--|--|
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I,
the undersigned officer of the Tempest Microsystems,
Inc. (formerly Rivet Acquisition Corporation)
 (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2006 of the Company fully complies, in
all material respects, with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and the information contained in the Report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


				 Michael Mojaver
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer

Date: November 14, 2006
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 15

- 00134

- CR

L.T. ETCHISON, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 18th District Court Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. F48379

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

L.T. Etchison, Jr.

, attempts to appeal his conviction s o f two counts of delivery of a

controlled substance and two counts of possession of a controlled substance. This Court is without

jurisdiction to consider Etchison’ s appeal because Etchison had no right of appeal due to his plea

bargain with the State.

The trial court ’s certification of right of appeal filed in this matter shows that this was a

plea bargain case in which Etchison had no right of appeal. The Texas Legislature has granted a

very limited right of appeal i n plea bargain cases. Rule 25.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure details that right as follows:

(2) . . . . In a plea bargain case

— that is, a case in which a defendant’s plea was guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the

pun ishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant

— a defendant may appeal only:

(A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or

(B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal.

T EX

.. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a )( 2). The appellate record filed in this matte r contains no written motions

filed by Etchison and ruled on before trial. Further, there is no indication in the record that

Etchison obtained the trial court’s permission to appeal. To the contrary, the trial court’s

certification indicates that Etchison has no right of appeal. Pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure , this Court is required to dismiss an appeal if, as in this case, the trial

court ’ s certification indicates no right of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d).3

On August 10 , 2015, we informed Etchison of the apparent defect in our jurisdiction over

his appeal and afforded him the opportunity to respond and, if possible, to cure such defect.

Etchison did not res pond to our letter.

Because Etchison’s plea agreement prevents an appeal and because the trial court’s

certification correctly indicates that Etchison is without a right of appeal , we dismiss this appeal

for want of jurisdiction.

Ralph K. Burgess

Just ice

Date Submitted: September 14 , 2015

Date Decided: September 15 , 2015

Do Not Publish
Shell Keys National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan 

Shell Keys National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan Shell Keys National Wildlife Refuge

USFWS Photo

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
guidance for

d strategies

e Fish and

e plans detail

ally above

for Service

s. The plans do

erational and

uisition.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2356 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Glufosinate-ammonium. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Glufosinate-ammonium. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GLUFOSINATE-AMMONIUM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Glufosinate-Ammonium: 2- 

amino-4- 

(hydroxymethylphosphinyl)butanoic acid 

monoammonium salt (CAS 

No. 77182–82–2) (provided 

for in subheading 

2931.90.9043) ....................... 2.0% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2356 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32.1





SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





In connection with the quarterly report
of Global Food Technologies, Inc. ("Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. Section 1350) that to their knowledge:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.





Dated
August 12, 2010





/s/ Keith MeeksKeith Meeks, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Marshall F SparksMarshall
      F. Sparks, Chief Financial
Officer
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

December 12, 2017 Session

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LARRY E. OROZCO

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County

No. F-72737B Paul G. Summers, Senior Judge

No. M2017-00327-CCA-R3-CD

NORMA MCGEE OGLE, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I join the majority in affirming the Defendant’s convictions for two counts of 

attempted second degree murder, two counts of unlawful employment of a firearm during 

the attempt to commit a dangerous felony, and seven counts of reckless endangerment 

committed with a deadly weapon. I write separately to dissent from the majority’s 

conclusion that the trial court did not err by admitting exhibit 13, the photograph showing 

the Defendant pointing two handguns at the camera, into evidence.

First, the majority concludes that the photograph was relevant because it shows the 

Defendant “brandishing a similar gun as used in the offense” and “demonstrates the 

Defendant’s familiarity with and dominion over the guns.” However, Detective Monroe 

could not say that the guns in the photograph were the same guns used during the crimes, 

and the Defendant’s familiarity with and dominion over guns was not at issue in the case.

Therefore, I do not think the photograph was relevant. 

The majority also concludes that the photograph was not excludable under 

Tennessee Rule of Evidence 404(b) because “possession of a handgun is not a ‘bad act’ 

requiring the application” of the Rule. The photograph in this case, though, shows much 

more than the Defendant merely possessing two handguns. It shows the Defendant 

standing with his arms outstretched in front of him, holding a gun in each hand, and with 

his legs slightly apart. The guns are pointed directly at the camera. The Defendant is 

wearing a toboggan; a white tank top; a gold chain around his neck; and black pants 

pulled down to his groin, exposing silver underpants. He has a menacing stance and 

expression, and the photograph certainly could be a reference to gang affiliation, which 

the trial court had prohibited. Moreover, I am puzzled as to how the majority could say 

the photograph is not prejudicial. In my view, the photograph is disturbing and, 

05/24/2018
- 2 -

therefore, highly prejudicial. 

In sum, I would have concluded that exhibit 13 was irrelevant under the definition 

of relevant evidence in Tennessee Rule of Evidence 401. I also would have concluded

that the photograph fell under the purview of Tennessee Rule of Evidence 404(b) as a 

prior bad act and was inadmissible under that Rule. Nevertheless, I have no doubt that 

the trial court’s error in admitting the photograph was harmless. By my count, five 

eyewitnesses identified the Defendant as the shooter in photograph arrays after the 

shooting. Those eyewitnesses and additional eyewitnesses testified at trial as to the 

Defendant’s being one of the shooters. The evidence against him was overwhelming, and 

he is not entitled to relief.

_________________________________ 

NORMA MCGEE OGLE, JUDGE
FORM 51-102F3
                             MATERIAL CHANGE REPORT

Item 1            Name and Address of Company

                  Vasogen Inc.
                  2505 Meadowvale Blvd
                  Mississauga, ON L5N 5S2

Item 2            Date of Material Change

                  March 7, 2007

Item 3            News Release

                  A press release with respect to the material change described
                  herein was issued on March 7, 2007 via Canada NewsWire and
                  filed on SEDAR.

Item 4            Summary of Material Change

                  Vasogen appointed Terrance H. Gregg President and CEO.

Item 5            Full Description of Material Change

                  Vasogen Inc. announced that Terrance H. Gregg has succeeded
                  David G. Elsley as President and Chief Executive Officer of
                  Vasogen. Mr. Gregg joined Vasogen's Board of Directors in
                  1999, was appointed Vice Chairman in November 2005, and became
                  Chairman of the Board in March 2006. David Elsley, who founded
                  Vasogen, will remain a member of Vasogen's Board of Directors
                  and Mr. Gregg will retain his position as Chairman.

Item 6            Reliance on subsection 7.1(2) or (3) of National Instrument
                  51-102

                  Confidentiality is not requested

Item 7            Omitted Information

                  Not applicable

Item 8            Executive Officer

                  For further information contact Glenn Neumann, Director of
                  Investor Relations, Vasogen Inc. at (905) 817-2004.

The foregoing accurately discloses the material change referred to herein.

DATED at Toronto, Ontario, this 7th day of March, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 168 (Friday, August 29, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 45763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22997]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-123; RM-9062]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Grand Isle, LA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Grand Isle Radio, allots 
Channel 283A to Grand Isle, Louisiana, as the community's first local 
aural transmission service. See 62 FR 23427, April 30, 1997. Channel 
283A can be allotted to Grand Isle in compliance with the Commission's 
minimum distance separation requirements without the imposition of a 
site restriction. The coordinates for Channel 283A at Grand Isle are 
29-13-54 NL and 89-59-54 WL. With this action, this proceeding is 
terminated.

DATES: Effective October 6, 1997. The window period for filing 
applications will open on October 6, 1997, and close on November 6, 
1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 97-123, adopted August 13, 1997, and 
released August 22, 1997. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, Washington, DC. 
The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, 
NW, Suite 140, Washington, DC 20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Louisiana, 
is amended by adding Grand Isle, Channel 283A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-22997 Filed 8-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P