alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re James Ray McDONALD v. STATE of Alabama. Ex parte James Ray McDonald.

SC 2706.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Aug. 26, 1977.

*103Arthur Parker of Parker & Garrett, Birmingham, for petitioner.

MADDOX, Justice.

Writ denied. By denying the writ, we point out that writs of certiorari are frequently denied without any consideration of the merits. *Haden v. Olan Mills, Inc.,*273 Ala. 129, 135 So.2d 388 (1961). A denial of certiorari should never be considered as an expression by the reviewing court on the merits of the controversy. See *Hamilton Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers,*240 U.S. 251, 36 S.Ct. 269, 60 L.Ed. 629 (1916). Our denial of the writ should not be understood as approving or disapproving the language used, or the statements of law contained in the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals. See *Cooper v. State,*287 Ala. 728, 252 So.2d 108 (1971).

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and FAULKNER, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
NO. 07-01-0312-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	OCTOBER 18, 2001

	______________________________

	WESTSIDE PAINT AND BODY, INC.,

			Appellant

	v.

	U. S.  EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION,

			Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE COUNTY CIVIL COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF HARRIS COUNTY;

	NO. 737-549; HON. R. JACK CAGLE, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

Before BOYD, CJ., QUINN and JOHNSON, JJ. 

	Westside Paint and Body, Inc. (Westside) appeals from a trial court’s judgment entered on May 18, 2001.   The clerk’s record was filed June 29, 2001.  However, the record does not reflect a request for the reporter’s record.  Thus, the appellant’s brief came due on July 30, 2001.   Tex. R. App. P. 38.6 (stating that the brief is due 30 days after the date the clerk’s or reporter’s record is filed, whichever is later).   Because Westside did not file said brief by that date, we informed it,  by letter on August 31, 2001,  that its appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3 unless it responded within ten days and showed good cause for continuing the appeal.  On September 6, 2001, Westside filed a motion requesting an extension of the August 31, 2001 deadline to September 18, 2001.   Said motion was granted.  However, no brief was filed.  Rather, on September 19, 2001, Westside requested a second extension seeking 14 more days to file its brief.  It represented that a settlement offer was under consideration.  We granted Westside the additional time sought and directed that the brief be filed by October 3, 2001.  To date, we have received neither a brief, motion for extension, nor notification of a settlement. 

	Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(b) and (c).

							Brian Quinn

							   Justice

Do not publish.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

					NO. 2-06-448-CR

STEPHEN E. GRAMLICH      	          					APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

		MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered the appellant’s “Withdrawal Of Notice Of Appeal And The Appeal.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id.; Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f). 								 														

							PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: January 11, 2007
#### SUNNY WRECKER SERVICE, INC., etc., et al., Petitioners, v. Paula F. HAWKINS et al., Respondents.

No. 51918.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 9, 1978.

Rehearing Denied April 26, 1978.

Richard B. Austin and John P. Bond, Miami, and David E. Erwin, Tallahassee, for petitioners.

Prentice P. Pruitt, Legal Director and Joseph A. McGlothlin and Pamela Johnson, Staff Counsels, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *ASI v. Public Service Commission,*334 So.2d 594 (Fla.1976).

OVERTON, C. J., and BOYD, SUND-BERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.

ENGLAND, J., dissents.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2263]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-88-002]


Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Company; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

January 24, 1997.
    Take notice that on January 21, 1997, Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas 
Company (Alabama-Tennessee) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet with a 
proposed effective date of May 21, 1997:

First Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 101

    Alabama-Tennessee states that the purpose of the filing is to 
comply with the order issued by the Commission in this proceeding on 
December 19, 1996 (77 FERC para.Sec. 61,281).
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such protests 
must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2263 Filed 1-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                           Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hartmarx Corporation, (the
"Company") for the period ended November 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Glenn R. Morgan, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Glenn R. Morgan
-----------------------------
Name:  Glenn R. Morgan
Title: Executive Vice President
       Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Date:  March 14, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to (S) 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
(S) 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Napoleon BRITT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 75-1817.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 20, 1977.

*26Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Frank B. Kessler, Chief, Appellate Division, and Marc R. Goldstein, Legal Intern, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Paul H. Zacks, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus having been granted with full appellate review, the appealed order is

AFFIRMED.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and DOWNEY and LETTS, JJ., concur.
#### Elbon Burnett HARDEN, Appellant, v. Sarah Christine Carter HARDEN, Appellee.

No. HH-41.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 10, 1978.

Terry McDavid of McDavid & Murphy, Lake City, for appellant.

Herbert F. Darby and Raymond 0. Ma-nasco, Jr. of Darby, Peele & Bowdoin, Lake City, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The proceedings giving rise to the order appealed were not transcribed, therefore, the record presented to us is insufficient to demonstrate reversible error.

Accordingly, the order appealed is affirmed.

McCORD, C. J., and MILLS and BOYER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

Certification of Treasurer



I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Big Sky Industries II, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: January 9, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 168 (Friday, August 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23116]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


National Assessment Governing Board; Closed Meeting

AGENCY: National Assessment Governing Board; Education.

ACTION: Notice of closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of a 
forthcoming meeting of the Design and Methodology Committee of the 
National Assessment Governing Board. This notice also describes the 
functions of the Board. Notice of this meeting is required under 
Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

DATES: September 23, 1997.

TIME: 9:00 A.M.-3:00 P.M. (closed).

LOCATION: Washington Court Hotel of Capitol Hill, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Ann Wilmer, Operations Officer, 
National Assessment Governing Board, Suite 825, 800 North Capitol 
Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20002-4233, Telephone: (202) 357-6938.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Assessment Governing Board is 
established under section 412 of the National Education Statistics Act 
of 1994 (Title IV of the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994), 
(Pub. L. 103-382).
    The Board is established to formulate policy guidelines for the 
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). The Board is 
responsible for selecting subject areas to be assessed, developing 
assessment objectives, identifying appropriate achievement goals for 
each grade and subject tested, and establishing standards and 
procedures for interstate and national comparisons.
    On September 23, 1997 between the hours of 9:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. 
the Design and Methodology Committee will convene in a closed meeting 
to review preliminary cost estimates for NAEP, and to discuss the 
implications of these estimates for the NAEP redesign. Also, the 
Committee will review and comment on the draft request for proposal, 
(RFP) for the next NAEP competition. Public disclosure of this 
information would likely have an adverse financial affect on the NAEP 
program. The discussion of this information would be likely to 
significantly frustrate implementation of a proposed agency action if 
conducted in open session. Such matters are protected by exemption 
(9)(B) of Sections 552b(c) of Title 5 U.S.C.
    Summaries of these activities and related matters, which are 
informative to the public and consistent with the policy of section 5 
U.S.C. 552b(c), will be available to the public within 14 days of the 
meeting.
    Records are kept of all Board proceedings and are available for 
public inspection at the U.S. Department of Education, National 
Assessment Governing Board, Suite 825, 800 North Capitol Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C., from 8:30 A.M. to 5:00 P.M.

    Dated: August 26, 1997.
Roy Truby,
Executive Director, National Assessment Governing Board.
[FR Doc. 97-23116 Filed 8-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-M
**Processed Food Trade Data (92016)**
# Turn in unwanted medications at DSCR Oct. 26

/ Published Oct. 19, 2017
Richmond, Virginia, 
Personnel on Defense Supply Center Richmond, as well as all DoD cardholders, have the opportunity to turn in unwanted or expired medication Oct. 26 during Drug Take Back Day.

The event will take place from 10 a.m. - 2 p.m. at the Occupational Health Clinic in Building 201.

This event is sponsored by Defense Logistics Agency Installation Operations at Richmond’s Security and Emergency Services and provides a safe venue where dangerous expired, unused, unwanted prescription and over-the-counter medications can be disposed. 

The service is free and anonymous. However, when disposing of prescription and over-the counter drugs, participants must adhere to the following requirements:

**Preparing items for disposal at a Take-Back Box location**
      -  All pharmaceutical drugs that are being disposed of need to be in a sealed container such as the original bottle or a zip-lock bag. They may not be disposed of loosely.  
      -  Liquid pharmaceuticals should remain in the original container.  
      -  Personal information should be removed or blotted out with a permanent marker.  

**Items accepted**

Prescription and over-the-counter solid medications, tablets and capsules, liquid medications, inhalers, creams, ointments, nasal sprays, and pet medicines

**Items not accepted**

Intravenous solutions, injectable medicines and needles  

For more information, call Security and Emergency Services at (804) 279-2035.
MIRANDA GOLD CORP.


Unit 1 – 15782 Marine Drive


White Rock, B.C. V4B 1E6





Tel:  (604) 536-2711


Fax: (604) 536-2788





Certification of CEO Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Miranda Gold Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Kenneth D. Cunningham, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:           December 13, 2012“signed” Kenneth D. CunninghamKenneth D. Cunningham, President and Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-193273) and Amendment No. 464 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 8, 2015, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP




Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


November 12, 2015
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 149 

For the relief of Ziad Mohamed Shaban Khweis, Heyam Ziad Khweis, and 

Juman Ziad Khweis. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25, 2005 

Mr. BINGAMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Ziad Mohamed Shaban Khweis, Heyam 

Ziad Khweis, and Juman Ziad Khweis. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

6 1101 et seq.), Ziad Mohamed Shaban Khweis, Heyam 

7 Ziad Khweis, and Juman Ziad Khweis shall be held and 

8 considered to have been lawfully admitted to the United 

9 States for permanent residence as of the date of enact10 ment of this Act upon payment of the required visa fees. 
2 

•S 149 IS

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS. 

2 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Ziad 

3 Mohamed Shaban Khweis, Heyam Ziad Khweis, and 

4 Juman Ziad Khweis, as provided in section 1, the Sec5 retary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce 

6 by the appropriate number for the appropriate fiscal year 

7 the total number of immigrant visas available to natives 

8 of the country of the aliens’ birth under section 203(a) 

9 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

10 1153(a)). 

Æ
----

|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To      my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of the Company as of and for the period covered by the    Report. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March 20,      2008 | By:    |    /s/ Barry W.      Chandler |
|--------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                                 |   | Barry      W. Chandler, President and        |
|                                 |   | Principal      Executive Officer             |

----
##### 



Exhibit 10.20
 STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
 PURSUANT TO
 SAVIENT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
 2004 INCENTIVE PLAN
* * *
 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT date, SAVIENT PHARMACEUTICALS,
INC. NAME,
 W I T N E S S E T H
   Grant of Option number
 Purchase Price $price
 Term of Option Exhibit A
  Nontransferability
 1




---



##### 



Termination of Option
     Changes in Capital Stock
 2




---



##### 



Method of Exercising Option th
    Treatment of Options
 General
 Representations of Optionee
 Notices
 3




---



##### 



th
 Reimbursement of Expenses
 Incorporation of Plan
 Continuance of Employment
 Interpretation
 Enforceability
 4




---



##### 



SAVIENT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.By:Authorized OfficerOPTIONEENameAddress:
 5




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
    Number of Years From Date of
    
    Percentage ExercisableOption Agreement
    
    Per Time Period
    
    CumulativeOne
    
    
    25% = #
    
    
    
    25% = #Two
    
    
    25% = #
    
    
    
    50% = #Three
    
    
    25% = #
    
    
    
    75% = #Four
    
    
    25% = #
    
    
    
    100% = #
  6
254 La. 15

#### Robert THOMAS v. Jack KELLEY.

No. 49821.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 9, 1969.

In re: Robert Thomas applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Landry. 220 So.2d 146.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21103]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision
[AC-23; OTS No. 7635]


Landmark Community Bank, Canajoharie, New York; Approval of 
Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on July 30, 1997, the Director, 
Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, or her designee, 
acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the application of 
Landmark Community Bank, Canajoharie, New York, to convert to the stock 
form of organization. Copies of the application are available for 
inspection at the Dissemination Branch, Office of Thrift Supervision, 
1700 G Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20552, and the Northeast Regional 
Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 10 Exchange Place, 18th Floor, 
Jersey City, New Jersey 07302.

    Dated: August 6, 1997.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21103 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M