alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,648
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 9,250
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     65,255
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        186,836
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,377
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 281,663
<DEPOSITS>                                     240,852
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,198
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,015
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,968
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,391
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,238
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 281,663
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,350
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,151
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   437
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                20,938
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,811
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,811
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,127
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      533
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  72
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,501
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,679
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,679
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,313
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.99
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                        468
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,858
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,745
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,029
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      231
<RECOVERIES>                                        47
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,377
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,377
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Richard J. Gavegnano, Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer of Meridian Interstate Bancorp, Inc., a
Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) and Leonard V. Siuda, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer of the Company, each certify in his capacity as an officer
of the Company that he has reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) and that to best of his
knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.










/s/
      Richard J. Gavegnano
            
            Dated:
      March 28, 2008Richard
      J. GavegnanoChairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer/s/
      Leonard V. Siuda
            
            Dated:
      March 28, 2008Leonard
      V. SiudaChief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)










A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






99
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4336]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2227]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Human Resource Development; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name and Committee Code: Special Emphasis Panel in Human 
Resource Development (<SUP>#1199)

    Date and Time: February 20, 1997: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; 
February 21, 1997: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
330, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Bobby Wilson, Program Director, Human 
Resource Development Division, Room 815, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230 Telephone: 
(703) 306-1634.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate formal proposals submitted to the 
Centers of Research Excellence in Science and Technology (CREST) 
Program as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: January 24, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-2227 Filed 1-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### Ira REAMER, Appellant, v. Cecilia D. REAMER, Appellee.

Nos. 77-2241, 77-2242, 77-2281 and, 77-2282.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 18, 1978.

Rehearings Denied Aug. 25, 1978.

*203Fogle, Connelly & Cook and Philip Cook, Miami, for appellant.

Hacker, Phelps & Matters and Michael S. Hacker, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

After a hotly-contested divorce suit, the parties having agreed to a division of their property but being unable to agree as to price, the trial judge [on July 14, 1977] appointed an appraiser and a listing broker to sell the residence of the parties. After the report of the appraiser was returned, the trial court ordered the husband to execute the listing agreement for the price stated in the appraisal. These appeals ensued, contesting the right of the trial court to appoint the appraiser in the first instance. We affirm.

The time for taking an appeal from the order of July 14, 1977 appointing the appraiser had expired. The only question that would have remained for consideration might have been the reasonableness of the value affixed on the property. No such attack was made on the appraisal, the order of the trial judge requiring a sale in compliance with the previous property settlement Agreement of the parties is hereby affirmed: *Edwards v. Edwards,*144 Fla. 374, 198 So. 14 (1940); *Herman A. Thomas, Inc. v. Sharpe,*309 So.2d 592 (Fla.3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.3

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

This document shall serve to amend that Employment Agreement (“the Agreement”) entered into by and between William Ashmore (“Employee”) and Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc. (“Employer”) which was effective as of January 1, 2013. The parties hereto wish to amend the Agreement effective as of October 1, 2015 as follows:

 

1.              Paragraph 2.1 shall be amended so that the term of the Agreement runs until December 31, 2017.

 

2.              The following shall be added as a new paragraph 3.1(f);

 

3.1(f) Employee shall be paid an additional payment of $1,900.00 per month.

 

3.              The following paragraphs shall be added to Exhibit C;

 

(g) any adjustment relating to recognition or valuing of deferred tax assets;

 

(h) any adjustment relating to an earn-out accretion associated with the acquisition of Cash Call Mortgage; and

 

(i) any adjustment relating to the change in estimated fair value of the contingent consideration liability associated with the acquisition of Cash Call Mortgage.

 

In all other regards the agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed.

 

 

	
/s/ William Ashmore
    	
 
    	
11/5/15
    
	
William Ashmore
    	
 
    	
Dated
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Impac Mortgage   Holdings, Inc.
    	
 
    	
Dated
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Alyssa Pullen v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00259

- CR

Trial court case number: 1817849

Trial court: Co Crim Ct at Law No 4 of Harris County

This case was abated and remanded to the trial court for the trial court to enter written

findings of fact and conclusions of law related to one of appellant’s suppression motions in the

trial court. The district clerk has filed a supplemental clerk’s re cord containing the trial court’s

findings of fact and conclusions of law. Accordingly, we REINSTATE this case on the Court’s

active docket.

Appellant’s brief is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the date of this order. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6(a).

Appellee’s brief, if any, is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the filing of

appellant’s brief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6(b)

.

It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 16, 2013
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                                  SUBSIDIARIES


                                                     Jurisdiction in
          Name                                      which Incorporated
          ----                                      ------------------

HARTMARX CORPORATION (Registrant)..................... Delaware
     Coppley Apparel Group Limited ................... Ontario, Canada
     Direct Route Marketing Corporation............... New Hampshire
     Hart Schaffner & Marx............................ New York
          HMX Sportswear, Inc......................... New York
          National Clothing Company, Inc.............. New York
          Winchester Clothing Company................. Kentucky
     Hickey-Freeman Co., Inc.......................... New York
     International Women's Apparel, Inc............... Texas
     Jaymar-Ruby, Inc. (d/b/a Trans-Apparel Group).... Indiana
          Anniston Sportswear Corporation............. Indiana
               E-Town Sportswear Corporation.......... Kentucky
               Rector Sportswear Corporation.......... Arkansas
          Biltwell Company, Inc....................... Missouri
     Men's Quality Brands, Inc........................ New York
     M. Wile & Company, Inc. (d/b/a Intercontinental
       Branded Apparel)............................... New York
          Intercontinental Apparel, Inc............... Delaware
     Plaid Clothing Company, Inc...................... Delaware
     Royal Shirt  Company Limited..................... Ontario, Canada
     Universal Design Group, Ltd...................... New York
     ----------------------------------------------------------

     The names of 32 subsidiaries are omitted, as such subsidiaries, considered
in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant
subsidiary.  The Registrant owns, directly or indirectly, 100% of the voting
securities of both the named and unnamed subsidiaries, except for one of the
unnamed subsidiaries, which is owned 50.1% by a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Registrant.  All of the above subsidiaries (including unnamed subsidiaries) are
included in the consolidated financial statements of the Registrant and its
subsidiaries.

                                       1
**I click on a file and all I get is    garbage on my screen.  What do I do?**

This may be due to the fact that you are not opening the file correctly.      If you are trying to open a data set, it is likely that it is accompanied by a README file.  Make sure you read it for any special    instructions on how to open the file.   

You can also look at Help to learn how to open    many of the USDA files.

Back to FAQs
USDA Economicsand Statistics SystemAlbert R. Mann Library, Cornell UniversityComments and questions to [email protected]
7/8/2014 ARS Project: GENOME SEQUENCING AND IDENTIFICATION OF VIRULENCE FACTORS IN FLAVOBACTERIUM PSYCHROPHILUM (408300) A....
USDA United States Department Of Agriculture
Agricultural Research Service

North Atlantic  Leetown, West Virginia

1&2) Printable Version = E-mail this page

a You are here: Research /

Enter Keywords Research

Advanced Search Research Project: GENOME SEQUENCING AND Project T
IDENTIFICATION OF VIRULENCE FACTORS IN roject Team
B By Sub FLAVOBACTERIUM PSYCHROPHILUM © Wiens, Gregory - Greg
rowse By Subject _ Scott LaPatra - Principal
> Home Location: Leetown, West Virginia Investigator
> About Us 2006 Annual Report Project Annual Reports
= FY 2008
5 4d.Progress report. o FY 2007
_ Programs and Projects this report serves to document research conducted under a Non- °
° Subjects of Funded Cooperative Agreement between ARS and Clear Springs foods, o FY 2006
Investigation Inc. o FY 2005
° Public Information Bacterial cold water disease, caused by Flavobacterium psychrophilum,  « FY 2004
> Products & Services is a serious problem for rainbow trout aquaculture. Conventional
approaches to vaccines have been ineffective and antibiotic resistance
> People & Places is of concern. This year, the remaining gaps in the F. psychrophilum Related National Programs
genome sequence were determined and the results indicate that the -
b News & Everts genome is composed of a single, circular chromosome. We have @ Aquaculture (106)
completed the preliminary identification and annotation of genes in
> Partnering the DNA sequence. The identified genes are the basis of ongoing

pea vaccine studies scheduled to be completed over the next three years.
This report serves to document research conducted under a Non-

\ Funded Cooperative Agreement between ARS and Clear Springs Foods

Inc. This work also addresses research outlined in the National

Program 106 Action Plan (Integrated Aquatic Animal Health: Microbial

Genomics Goal 1).

Last Modified: 05/14/2009
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House

https:/web.archive.or g/wweb/20090515092237/http:/Amww.ars.usda.goviresearchiprojects/projects.htm?ACCN_NO=408300&showpars=tr ue8fy=2006 1"
#### SHERRY FRONTENAC HOTEL and Employers Service Corporation, Petitioners, v. Edna HABICHT and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 37862.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 4, 1970.

Eugene E. Williams, of Williams & Jab-ara, Miami, for petitioners.

Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission, now Industrial Relations Commission.

We conclude from our consideration of the petition, record and briefs, and after having heard oral argument, that the order of the Commission must be quashed on authority of the decision of this Court in Brown v. Griffin, 229 So.2d 225 (Fla.1969), and the cause remanded with directions that the matter be returned to the Judge of Industrial Claims for further findings of fact on the evidence already taken, in compliance with our opinions in Brown v. Griffin, *supra,*and Hardy v. City of Tarpon Springs, 81 So.2d 503 (Fla.1955).

The petition for attorneys fees filed by respondent is hereby denied.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
#### State of Missouri, Respondent, *vs.*John Turner, Appellant.

1. *.Practice, criminal*— Joinder *of charges*— Section *of counts.*— The charges of burglary and larceny, where relating *to*the same transaction, may be joined in the same indictment. (Wagn. Stat. 455, $ 19.) Nor is the State compelled, in such case, to elect on which charge it will proceed.

2. *Practice, civil*— Instructions, *etc.*— A case should not be taken from the jury when there is any evidence to sustain the issues.

3. *Instructions, refusal of not error, when.*— The refusal of instructions not applicable to the olfense charged, or in-lieu of which others are given, is not error.

*Appeal from Webster Circuit Court.*

Appellant not represented.

*Jno. A.*Hockaday, *Att'y Gen'l,*for Respondent,

cited: State vs. Alexander, 56 Mo. 131; State vs. Henley, 30 Mo. 511.

Norton, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Webster county, charged with burglary in the second degree and grand larceny. The defendant was put upon his trial, the jury returning a verdict of acquittal on the charge of burglary, and a verdict of guilty on the charge of larceny. Motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment were filed and overruled, from which defendant appealed.

The record shows that defendant filed a motion to quash the indictment on the grounds that the offenses charged could not be joined. It is expressly provided by the 19th section of Wagn. Stat. (p. 455), “that if any person in committing burglary, also *437commits a larceny, he may be prosecuted for both offenses in the same count, or in separate counts of the same indictment,” and the motion to quash was, therefore, properly overruled.,

A motion was also filed to compel the State to elect on which count 'it would proceed to trial. The counts in the indictment related to the same transaction, and they were expressly authorized to he joined, and the court committed no error in refusing to compel the State to elect on which it would proceed. (State vs. Porter, 26 Mo. 201.)

The instructions one, two, three and four, asked by the defendant, were properly refused by the court. The first instruction sought to take the entire case from the jury, when there was sufficient evidence to require its submission to them. The declarations asked to be given in the second, third and fourth instructions had been announced in others which had been given. Besides this, the defendant was not injured by the refusal of the court to give them. Three of them related to the charge of burglary in the second degree, and as to this charge defendant wap found not guilty.

Upon the whole case we think the conviction of defendant for larceny was rightful, and the judgment will,, therefore, not be disturbed. (State vs. Alexander, 56 Mo. 131.)

The judgment is affirmed.

The other judges concur, except Judge Wagner, who is absent.
42516 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 152 / Thursday, August 7, 1997 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 97–26]

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: The Department of Defense,

Defense Security Assistance Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is

publishing the unclassified text of a

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification.

This is published to fulfill the

requirements of section 155 of P.L. 104–

164 dated 21 July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSAA/COMPT/CPD, (703)

604–6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to

the Speaker of the House of

Representatives, Transmittal 97–26,

with attached transmittal, policy

justification, and sensitivity of

technology.

Dated: August 1, 1997.

L. M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5000–04–M
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 152 / Thursday, August 7, 1997 / Notices 42517
42518 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 152 / Thursday, August 7, 1997 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 152 / Thursday, August 7, 1997 / Notices 42519
42520 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 152 / Thursday, August 7, 1997 / Notices

[FR Doc. 97–20795 Filed 8–6–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–C
254 La. 639

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Ivory NEDD, Petitioner, v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent.

No. 50076.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1969.

ORDER

Considering the petition alleging noncompliance with the requirements of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799, and the return of the district attorney in which he recites:

> “After having reviewed the record in this matter, it is the position of the office of the District Attorney that this office has no objection to the granting of petitioner’s motion for release in this matter.”

It is ordered that the writ of habeas corpus be granted and that petitioner, Ivory Nedd, be released from the Louisiana State Penitentiary forthwith.