alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Commentary: History comes full circle at Yokosuka
 
  By Seaman DeFaye Bruster, Emergency Supply Operations Center
  *Note: As Dec. 7 marks the 75th anniversary of the attack on Pearl Harbor, in which nearly 2,500 U.S. military members and civilians were killed, DLA honors their memory with a commentary from a current Navy sailor serving with DLA in Japan.* On Nov. 26, 1941, a Japanese Task Force of six aircraft carriers left northern Japan for a position northwest of Hawaii. The Akagi, Kaga, Soryu, Shokaku, and Zuikaku planned on launching 408 aircraft to attack Pearl Harbor. Though the most of history focuses on the aerial attacks, submarines were also involved. The Japanese Fleet submarines I-16, I-18, I-20, I-22, and I-24, each embarked a Type A mini-submarine for transport to the waters off Oahu. The five I-boats left Kure Naval District Nov. 25, 1941. On Dec. 6, they came to within 10 nautical miles of the mouth of Pearl Harbor and launched their midget subs on Dec. 7, 1941. At 3:42 a.m., the minesweeper USS Condor spotted a mini-submarine periscope southwest of the Pearl Harbor entrance buoy and alerted the destroyer USS Ward. The mini-sub may have entered Pearl Harbor; however, the USS Ward sank another midget submarine at 6:37 a.m. in the first American shots in the Pacific Theater. A mini-submarine on the north side of Ford Island missed the seaplane tender USS Curtiss with her first torpedo and missed the attacking destroyer USS Monaghan with her other one before being sunk by USS Monaghan at 8:43 a.m. The Imperial Japanese Navy submarines were by far the most varied fleet of submarines during World War II. Yokosuka Naval Base, formerly Yokosuka Naval Arsenal, became one of the main shipyards used. Interestingly enough, here in DLA Distribution Yokosuka, Japan, one of the main warehouses, Building J39, used to house Japanese submarines. Looking up into the rafters, you can still see the old signs from the past. Today Building J39 no longer houses submarines. Instead, the large warehouse houses hundreds of thousands of line items and stock for the U.S. warfighters around the world. History has indeed come full circle. Each day, the warehouse is bustling with local employees and military personnel receiving and shipping out integral parts for the ships homeported and deployed. Today, a strong friendship brings us together to help out any warfighter in need.
#### The State v. Davis *et al., Appellants.*

DIVISION TWO.

The Doctrine announced in the case of *State v. Buck,*43 Mo. App. 443, approved.

*Certified from Kansas City Court of Appeals.*

Affirmed.

*John M. Wood,*Attorney General, for the State.

Thomas, J.

Defendants were indicted in t.he circuit court of Harrison county for disturbing the peace of a family by loud, offensive and indecent conversation, and by threatening, challenging and fighting. Being tried and convicted,- they appealed to the Kansas City court of appeals, which affirmed the judgment of the trial court, and on their motion the case was transferred to this court, on the ground that the decision was in conflict with the opinion,of the St. Louis court of appeals in the case of *State v. Bach,*25 Mo. App. 554. But as the opinion in *State v. Bach*has been overruled by the St. Louis court of appeals in *State v. McDaniel,*40 Mo. App. 356; *State v. Fare,*39 Mo. App. 110; *State v. Parker,*39 Mo. App. 116, and *State v. Buck,*43 Mo. App. 443, there is now no conflict between the two courts of appeals on the question involved, and hence there is nothing for us to decide, the correct doctrine having been announced in *State v. Buck, State v. McDaniel, State v. Fare*and *State v. Parker, supra.*Judgment affirmed.

All of this division concur.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of Greater Community Bancorp (the "Company") for the three months ended March
31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company,
certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, that the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable; and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.





Date:May 7, 2008








/s/ Anthony M. Bruno,
Jr.


Anthony
M. Bruno, Jr.


Chief
Executive Officer








/s/ Stephen J.
Mauger


Stephen
J. Mauger


Chief
Financial Officer





29
*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should

not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth

in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40349

LUTHER OTIS FOSTER, III,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNIDENTIFIED PARTY, John Doe #1, Warden; 

UNIDENTIFIED PARTY, John Doe # 2,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont

USDC No. 1:01-CV-44

April 1, 2002

Before POLITZ, HIGGINBOTHAM, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Luther Otis Foster, III, a federal prisoner who is a pro se litigant proceeding in

forma pauperis, brought an action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
1

403 U.S. 388 (1971).

2

of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,

1

alleging that defendants negligently subjected him to

second-hand smoke by failing to enforce a no-smoking policy. The district court

dismissed the complaint as barred under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Three prior actions by

Foster had been dismissed as frivolous or for failing to state a claim. Therefore, under

§ 1915(g), proceeding in forma pauperis, Foster was required to show he was “under

imminent danger of serious physical injury.” The district court found that Foster did

not make such a showing and dismissed the complaint. 

Whether Foster’s complaint states a claim that he is “under imminent danger of

serious physical injury,” is a conclusion of law which we review de novo.

We find neither error nor abuse of discretion in the district court’s determination

that Foster failed to demonstrate in his petition that he isin “imminent danger ofserious

physical injury.” Therefore, dismissal under § 1915(g) was proper.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31-1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Samuel Serritella, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report of Form 10-QSB/A of
          International Surfacing, Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
          untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
          necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
          under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
          the period covered by this quarterly report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
          information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
          material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
          cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
          this quarterly report;

     4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
          and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)
          for the registrant and we have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, is made known to me
          by others within the company, particularly during the period in which
          this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   Presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.   I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
          registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
          directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);

     a)   All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

     6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
          significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
          could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of
          our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
          regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 23, 2004

-------------------------------
Samuel Serritella
Chief Executive Officer
## Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re Michael Allyn Kennedy

No. 06

- 19

- 00103

- CV Original Prohibition Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice

Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice

Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that this original proceeding should

be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, we dismiss the original proceeding.

RENDERED JANUARY 30, 2020

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF J USTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45407-45408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22764]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP96-63-004]


Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

August 21, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 18, 1997, Iroquois Gas Transmission 
System, L.P. (Iroquois) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to 
become effective September 17, 1997:

Third Revised Sheet No. 38

    Iroquois states that this sheet was submitted in compliance with 
the provisions of the Commission's August 6, 1997 Order On Rehearing, 
80 FERC para. 61,213 (August 6, 1997) (Order). In its Order, the 
Commission denied the request for rehearing of Long Island Lighting 
Company and the Brooklyn Union Gas Company except to the limited extent 
of ruling that Iroquois should credit net cash-out proceeds received by 
Iroquois pursuant to Sections 6.2 and 6.3 of its PAL (Park and Loan) 
Rate Schedule to firm transportation customers. The tariff

[[Page 45408]]

sheet included herewith reflects the inclusion of a new provision 
consistent with the Commission's ruling.
    Iroquois also states that copies of this filing were served upon 
all customers and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22764 Filed 8-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries IV, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 4, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries IV, Inc.
```

[106th Congress Public Law 540]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ540.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 2571]]

Public Law 106-540
106th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
      Making further continuing <<NOTE: Dec. 8, 2000 -  [H.J. Res. 
 128]>> appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-275, 
is <<NOTE: Ante, p. 2570.>> further amended by striking the date 
specified in section 106(c) and inserting ``December 11, 2000''.

    Approved December 8, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 128:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Dec. 8, considered and passed House and Senate.

                                  <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1706

MARCIALENA TREMBLE BROWN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CENTERRA-SAVANNAH RIVER SITE; JERRY STEVENSON; RAYMOND 

SMITH,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. 

Sherri A. Lydon, District Judge. (1:19-cv-02047-SAL)

Submitted: January 26, 2021 Decided: February 2, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcialena Tremble Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Wofford Johnson,

GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Marcialena Tremble Brown appeals the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. Brown v. Centerra-Savannah River Site, No. 1:19-cv-02047-SAL

(D.S.C. May 29, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22815]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION


Federal Acquisition Policy Division, FAR Secretariat, 
Cancellation of a Standard Form

AGENCY: General Services Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Acquisition Regulations eliminated the need for 
Standard Form 119, Statement of Contingent or Other Fees removing the 
regulations that required its use. Therefore, SF 119 is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Ralph DeStefano, (202) 501-1758.

Effective date: August 27, 1997.

    Dated: August 21, 1997.
Barbara M. Williams,
Deputy Standard and Optional Forms Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-22815 Filed 8-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-M
No. 9625.

#### The Lima Railway Company *v.*Little.

(Decided June 26, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Allen county.

*Mr. V. P. Kline; Messrs. Richie S Richie*and *Mr. W. H. Leete,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Ridenour & Halfhill,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers and Spear, JJ., concur.
#### Robert J. McDOUGALL, II, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1565.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 20, 1977.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Frank B. Kessler, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Harry M. Hipler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED on authority of *State v. Nelson,*347 So.2d 749 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

ALDERMAN, C. J., and DOWNEY and LETTS, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 11.4


                     ACTION BY UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF THE
              BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WALKER WINGSAIL SYSTEMS PLC


The undersigned, being all of the directors of Walker Wingsail Systems plc, 
hereby consent to the adoption of the following resolutions:


RESOLVED: To direct and authorise the appropriate representatives of the 
Corporation to make an offer to the shareholders of Walker Wingsail America 
Inc of two Walker Wingsail Systems plc Ordinary Shares for every one Walker 
Wingsail America Inc share of Common Stock held, and that in the event that 
sufficient consents are achieved to execute an Agreement of Takeover between 
the Corporation and Walker Wingsail America Inc, on the terms and conditions 
as set forth in a copy of said Agreement annexed hereto. 

RESOLVED: That such Takeover shall become effective, if approved, on or 
before 31st August 1997.


Dated 10th July 1997


                                       ________________________________
                                       John Graham Walker



                                       ________________________________
                                       Jean Margaret Walker



                                       ________________________________
                                       Raymond Peter Turgoose
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries IV, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 3, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries IV, Inc.
#### Willie O’HARA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-628.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Dec. 2, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit
      21








Subsidiaries
      of the Registrant





The
      Wilber Corporation has the following subsidiaries, which are both
      wholly-owned:





Wilber
      National Bank, a national bank





Provantage
      Funding Corporation, a New York State licensed mortgage bank.









105-K
**Farm Employment and Wage Rates (91005)**
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RONALD EUGENE REYNOLDS,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 15

- 0037 3

- CR

Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 4

of Montgomery County, Texas

(TC # 15

- 30788 9 )

O R D E R

The Court has determined that it is necessary to review the original of State’s Exhibits 149

(Client file for Kalisha Keller), 150 (Client file for George Sanchez), 151 (client file for Carolina

Castelan), and 152 (client file for Jose and Destiny Trevino). It is therefore Ordered that Cassandra

McCoy, Official Court Reporter of the County Co urt at Law Number Four for Montgomery

County, Texas, prepare a supplemental Reporter’s Record to include the original of State’s

Exhibits 149, 150, 151, and 152 and forward the same to this Court on or before June 26, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 12 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Cynthia L. Sullivan, President and Chief Executive Officer of Immunomedics, Inc., certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Immunomedics, Inc.;

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 
| Date: October 4, 2016                   |
|-----------------------------------------|
|                                    |
|                                    |
| /s/ CYNTHIA L.   SULLIVAN          |   |
| Cynthia L. Sullivan                     |
| President and Chief   Executive Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1



                      SUBSIDIARIES OF IRONSTONE GROUP, INC.



AcadiEnergy, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a 100%-owned subsidiary of the
Company.

Belt Perry Associates, Inc., an Arizona corporation, ("BPA") is a 100%-owned
subsidiary of the Company.

Belt Perry Associates, Inc., a California corporation, is 81.63% owned by BPA
and 16.33% owned by the Company.

DeMoss Corporation, a California corporation, is a 100%-owned subsidiary of the
Company.

TaxNet, Inc., an Arizona corporation, is a 100%-owned subsidiary of BPA.



                                       14
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Southwest Music Distribution, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kent Puckett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                           |                                      
|-------------------------- | -------------------------------------
|Dated:   December 19, 2007 | /s/ Kent Puckett                     
|                           | Kent Puckett, Chief Financial Officer