alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Affirmed and Opinion Filed September 29, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-14-01251-CR No. 05-14-01252-CR

LAVANDRA DONTEKA RUSHING, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F13-61091-W, F12-10110-W



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Myers Opinion by Justice Francis

Lavandra Donteka Rushing appeals her convi ctions for abandoning a child with the

intention to return and theft of property valued at $1,500 or more but less than $20,000. The trial

court assessed punishment in each case at confinem ent for eighteen months in a state jail facility.

On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeals are wholly

frivolous and without merit. Th e brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S.

738 (1967). The brief presents a professional eval uation of the record showing why, in effect,

there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex.

Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Coun sel delivered a copy of the brie f to appellant. We advised‐ 2 ‐ appellant of her right to file a pro se response, but she did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v.

State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (ide ntifying duties of appellate courts

and counsel in Anders cases).

We have reviewed the reco rd and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824,

826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explain ing appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree

the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably

support the appeals.

We affirm the trial court’s judgments.

Do Not Publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47

141251F.U05

/Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE‐ 3 ‐ 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

JUDGMENT

LAVANDRA DONTEKA RUSHING, Appellant

No. 05-14-01251-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F13-61091-W). Opinion delivered by Justice Francis, Justices Bridges and Myers participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is AFFIRMED

.

Judgment entered September 29, 2015.‐ 4 ‐ 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

JUDGMENT

LAVANDRA DONTEKA RUSHING, Appellant

No. 05-14-01252-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F12-10110-W). Opinion delivered by Justice Francis, Justices Bridges and Myers participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is AFFIRMED

.

Judgment entered September 29, 2015.
March 28, 2014 

Susan Kurland 

County of Clinton 

INDUSTRIAL 

DEVELOPMENT 

AGENCY 

Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs 

Dennis DeVany 

Chief, EAS Program 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue,SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Essential Air Service at Plattsburgh, NY 

Docket DOT-OST-2003-14783 

Dear Ms. Kurland and Mr. DeVany: 

On behalf of County of Clinton Industrial Development Agency 

(CCIDA), I am writing to express our strong support for the proposal of 

Peninsula Airways, Inc. (PenAir) to continue providing air service between 

Plattsburgh, New York and Boston, Massachusetts. 

PenAir' s nonstop service to/from Boston is the only scheduled air 

service link for Plattsburgh, NY. It is critically important for our community, 

and for the overall economic development of the area, that this service 

continues. 

The CCIDA strives to support smart economic development of our 

community and seeks to further expand opportunities available to its resident. 

This key connection provides Plattsburgh International with a convenient link 

for business and leisure travelers alike to a major airport hub. Moreover, 

PenAir's service helps maintains the airport's market base in the northeast, 

which has numerous economic benefits to the region as a whole. 

190 Banker Road, Suite 500, Plattsburgh, New York, USA 12901 

tel (518) 563-3100 I fax (518) 562-2232 I email ccida@thedevelopcorp.com 
CCIDA Letter of Support 

Re: Essential Air Service at Plattsburgh, NY 

Docket DOT-OST-2003-14783 

March 28,2014 

Page 2 of2 

The loss ofPenAir's service would be devastating for our community. 

Hence why, the CCIDA strongly urges the Department to select PenAir to 

continue its subsidized essential air service between Plattsburgh, New York 

and Boston, Massachusetts. Thank you for your time and consideration on 

this matter. 

rin M. Hynes, 

Executive Director 

cc: Trent Trahan, Chair 

Chris Kreig, Airport Manager, PBG 

EMH/bjs
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LUKE STANTON,

 Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-12-00293-CR

Appeal from the

211th District Court

of Denton County, Texas

(TC# F-2011-1911-C)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2014.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

Rivera, J., not participating
# DLA chaplain offers insight on relationships, suicide, social media

/ Published Feb. 6, 2018
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency chaplain told employees at DLA Troop Support in Philadelphia that diversity has helped make him a better person.

“I realize what an amazing country we live in, what amazing times we live in, and how the many different types of people from different walks of life with different cultures and backgrounds than me help make me a better person,” Army Chaplain (Col.) Carleton Birch said.

Birch spoke to the Troop Support workforce Jan. 25 about improving relationships and resiliency at work and at home. 

He said that when he was first assigned to DLA, he was tasked with developing the spirituality component of DLA’s resiliency model, which also contains physical, mental and social components. 

While exploring the DLA resiliency model, he said he soon learned that diversity played a major role.

“You can’t talk about resiliency and relationships without discussing the idea of diversity,” he said.

Attending many of the diversity-themed events at DLA helped him realize how he’s a better person because of diversity, he said. 

The chaplain was introduced by Christina Panichelle, a management analyst with the Command Support Office who oversees DLA Troop Support’s resiliency program.

“So many people feel isolated and disconnected,” she said. “Now, more than ever, there’s a need to connect with our families, our friends, our co-workers and our communities.”

Panichelle said the intention of the chaplain’s visit was to address these connections and how they impact many facets of Troop Support employees’ lives. 

Birch addressed the major role that social media has on relationships and that it’s not always apparent whether the impact is positive or negative. He admitted that social media is great for spreading information, but cautioned that it may contribute to spreading hateful ideas. 

“The jury is still out on this. And so I would say keep your eyes and ears open to some of the research,” Birch said.

The chaplain also talked about marital communication and awareness, specifically how expectations among couples are often different. He said spouses should become students of one another. 

“The key is to figure out the ways that they give and receive love,” he said.

Birch said that he and his spouse have differing views, and that he knows he must adjust his tendencies to ensure effective communication with his spouse.

He also suggested people look into suicide-prevention training because it’s important to recognize when people are in crisis and how to intervene effectively. He said the techniques are just as useful at home as they are at work.

“I know that by statistics, suicide has affected just about everyone in this room, and some of us wish we would’ve known how to intervene when the time came,” he said.
Economic

Census

WB92-1

Issued December 1996

CHANGE SHEET

Below are the statistics for the following places in Pennsylvania which did not appear in the publication: Wyoming,

Wyomissing, Yeadon, York (York County), York township (York County), and Zelienople.

Table 6. Statistics for Places With 100 or More Women-Owned Firms: 1992

[Detail may not add to total because of rounding. For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text. For explanation of terms, see

appendix A. For information on geographic areas followed by m, see appendix C]

Geographic area

All firms Firms with paid employees

Relative standard error of

estimate (percent)1

for column—

Firms

(number)

Sales and

receipts

($1,000)

Firms

(number)

Sales and

receipts

($1,000)

Employees

(number)

Annual

payroll

($1,000)

A B C D E FABC D

PENNSYLVANIA

Wyoming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 12 502 26 10 762 189 3 349 18 10 61 5

Wyomissing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285 63 245 63 55 723 912 14 288 10 23 40 26

Yeadon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162 31 199 11 (D) (D) (D) 7 2 - (D)

York (York County) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 801 560 424 182 550 808 7 829 100 709 6 10 21 10

York township (York County). . . . . . . 303 54 096 50 (D) (D) (D) 8 2 32 (D)

Zelienople . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 27 141 17 25 942 232 4 899 8 1 - -

- Represents zero.

1

For explanation of relative standard errors, see Reliability of Estimates in the introductory text.

WOMEN-OWNED

BUSINESSES

U.S. Department of Commerce

Economics and Statistics Administration

BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
# EUR-Lex - 41998D0052 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 41998D0052

**The Schengen acquis - Decision of the Executive Committee of 16 December 1998 on the Handbook on cross-border police cooperation (SCH/Com-ex (98) 52) **

*
Official Journal L 239 , 22/09/2000 P. 0408 - 0408 *

DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

of 16 December 1998

on the Handbook on cross-border police cooperation

(SCH/Com-ex (98)52)

THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE,

Having regard to Article 132 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement,

Having regard to Articles 2(3), 3, 7, 39, 40, 41, 46, 47 and 92 of the abovementioned Convention,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The Schengen Handbook on cross-border police cooperation (Doc. SCH/I (98)90(1)), annexed hereto, is hereby adopted. At the same time the Executive Committee Declaration of 29 June 1995 (Doc. SCH/Com-ex (95) Decl. 2) is hereby repealed.

2. The Schengen Manual on police cooperation in maintaining public order and security (Doc. SCH/I (97)36 Rev. 5) has been incorporated into the Handbook on cross-border police cooperation. The Executive Committee Decision of 24 June 1997 (Doc. SCH/Com-ex (97)6 Rev. 2) is hereby repealed.

3. The Contracting States shall incorporate the Handbook on cross-border police cooperation into their national orders and forward the Handbook to their police services for implementation.

4. The Schengen Secretariat shall be responsible for constantly updating the Handbook in the form of a loose-leaf binder. To this end the Contracting States shall keep the General Secretariat abreast of any amendments to be made to their national fact sheets.

5. Every six months the Presidency-in-office shall consult the States on the need to update the general part and shall update the Handbook.

6. The Presidency will forward the Handbook to the European Union for information purposes.

Berlin, 16 December 1998.

The Chairman,

C. H. Schapper

(1) Restricted document.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. John R. MARTIN.

No. 61434.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 28, 1978.

Ralph L. Barnett, Gretna, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., John M. Mam-oulides, Dist. Atty., Patrick C. Leitz, Asst. Dist. Atty., Abbott J. Reeves, Director, Research and Appeals Division, Gretna, for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# DLA saves money, resources

/ Published Aug. 17, 2018
DAVIS-MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz. , *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Davis-Monthan Air Force Base website.*
**Ozone in the Northeastern United States (92018)**
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Crystal Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,
2003 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  November 10, 2003
Exhibit 32.1



                                  Certification

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350
of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of
Digital Lifestyles Group, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify with respect
to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December
31, 2005 (the "Report") that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



Date: June 21, 2006           By:      /s/  Andy Teng
                                       -----------------------------------------
                              Name:    Andy Teng
                              Title:   Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
                                       Officer and Chairman of the Board

     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
# L_2023171EN.01000501.xml

| 6.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 171/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 171/5

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/1414

of 29 June 2023

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Powidła śliwkowe z Doliny Dolnej Wisły’ (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Poland’s application to register the name ‘Powidła śliwkowe z Doliny Dolnej Wisły’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Poland’s application to register the name ‘Powidła śliwkowe z Doliny Dolnej Wisły’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Powidła śliwkowe z Doliny Dolnej Wisły’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Powidła śliwkowe z Doliny Dolnej Wisły’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Powidła śliwkowe z Doliny Dolnej Wisły’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 June 2023.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 96, 15.3.2023, p. 30.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
#### Rudolph GRANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-232.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 25, 1977.

*359Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Richard S. Power, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Marsha G. Madorsky, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was initially charged in Count I of the information with involuntary sexual battery by using a deadly weapon or actual physical force likely to cause serious personal injury, a life felony. Immediately before trial, the State filed an amended information charging appellant in Count I with involuntary sexual battery by threatening to use force likely to cause serious personal injury, a first degree felony.

Although the State contends on appeal that the amended information did not reduce the charge from a life felony to a felony of the first degree, the trial transcript belies that contention. The prosecutor stated without equivocation that the amended information charged appellant with a first degree felony. We agree with the prosecutor. Therefore, the court was in error in sentencing appellant to forty-six years, two hundred and sixty-five days imprisonment on Count I. The maximum sentence allowable for Count I as amended, a first degree felony, is thirty years.

We have carefully examined all of appellant’s other points and find no reversible error involved therein.

Accordingly, the sentence appealed from is modified so as to reduce the sentence on Count I to thirty years. In all other respects the judgment and sentence appealed from are affirmed.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

ALDERMAN, C. J., DOWNEY, J., and PARHAM, HARRY C., Associate Judge, concur.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131102 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

ROBERT LITTLE and BARBARA Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, LITTLE, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 131102 

 COA: 257781 

Oakland CC: 1998-006136-CZ 

THOMAS TRIVAN, DARLENE 

TRIVAN, STEVEN KIN, and 

ROSALYN KIN,

 Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 23, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
#### Yvonne M. HILL, etc. v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. et al.

No. 6227.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 2, 1978.

In re: John J. Capretto, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 357 So.2d 61.

Denied.
**Fruit Wildlife Damage
A product of the National Agricultural Statistics Service, Agricultural Statistics Board, U.S. Department of Agriculture**Description:**
**
S. 1275

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and six

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7172 North

Tongass Highway, Ward Cove, Alaska, as the ‘‘Alice R. Brusich Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALICE R. BRUSICH POST OFFICE BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 7172 North Tongass Highway, in Ward Cove,

Alaska, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Alice R. Brusich

Post Office Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Alice R. Brusich Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
IB 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1726 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2006 

Referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 324 Main Street in Grambling, Louisiana, 

as the ‘‘Coach Eddie Robinson Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

S 1726 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. COACH EDDIE ROBINSON POST OFFICE BUILD2 ING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 324 Main Street in Grambling, 

5 Louisiana, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Coach 

6 Eddie Robinson Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Coach Eddie Robinson 

11 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the Senate September 30 (legislative day, 

September 29), 2006. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS