alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32(b)

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 of Citizens Holding Company (the Company), as
filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), I, Robert T. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 7, 2008 |  | /s/ Robert T. Smith                  
|                     |  | Robert T. Smith                      
|                     |  | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1413

AN ACT

To redesignate the Crowne Plaza in Kingston, Jamaica as

the Colin L. Powell Residential Plaza.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 1413 ES

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF COLIN L. POWELL RESIDEN2 TIAL PLAZA.

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building in King4 ston, Jamaica, formerly known as the Crowne Plaza and

5 now a staff housing facility for the United States mission

6 in Jamaica, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Colin

7 L. Powell Residential Plaza’’.

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

10 States to the Federal building referred to in subsection

11 (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Colin L. Pow12 ell Residential Plaza.

Passed the Senate July 15, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1413

AN ACT

To redesignate the Crowne Plaza in Kingston,

Jamaica as the Colin L. Powell Residential Plaza.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 152 (Thursday, August 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20960]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

agency: Federal Election Commission.
    Date & Time: Tuesday, August 12, 1997 at 10:00 a.m.
    Place: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    Status: This meeting will be closed to the public.
    Items to be Discussed:
Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g.
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec. 437g, Sec. 438(b), and Title 
26, U.S.C.
Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.
    Date & Time: Thursday, August 14, 1997 at 10:00 a.m.
    Place: 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. (ninth floor)
    Status: This meeting will be open to the public.
    Items to be Discussed:
Correction and Approval of Minutes.
Advisory Opinion 1997-12: Representative Jerry Costello by counsel, 
Jeffrey D. Colman.
Advisory Opinion 1997-13: United Space Alliance Political Action 
Committee by counsel, Timothy W. Jenkins.
Advisory Opinion 1997-14: Mississippi Republican Party by counsel, 
Robert F. Wood.
Administrative Matters.

person to contact for information: Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 219-4155.
Marjorie W. Emmons,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-20960 Filed 8-5-97; 10:44 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 28, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 28, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16I0242. ALAN TONEY v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

CR151646
#### ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SHREVEPORT et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11392.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit

March 3, 1970.

Rehearing Denied March 31, 1970.

*43Ferris & Achee, by Roland J. Achee, Shreveport, for plaintiff-appellant.

J. N. Marcantel, John Gallagher, John L. Schober, Jr., Shreveport, for defendants-appellees City of Shreveport and Terry W. Farley.

Nesib Nader, Shreveport, for defendants-appellees Jerry and Willie Mae Nelson.

Before AYRES, DIXON and WILLIAMS, JJ.

DIXON, Judge.

This is the companion case to Powell v. Allstate Insurance Company et al., 233 So. 2d 38, No. 11,391. Allstate Insurance Company brings a subrogation suit against the City of Shreveport, Terry W. Farley and Jerry Nelson and Wille Mae Nelson, seeking to recover $448.52 as a result of the collision damage it paid its insured, Mrs. Charlotte Powell.

The accident is described and the issues decided in No. 11,391. The district court rejected the subrogation demands of Allstate. Since we find the negligence of the city’s police vehicle the sole proximate cause of the accident, it will be necessary to reverse the judgment of the district court. There is now judgment in favor of Allstate Insurance Company and against Terry W. Farley and the City of Shreveport, in solido, for $448.52 with interest from date of judicial demand until paid, and all costs.
Exhibit
      32(b)





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Oak Hill Financial, Inc. (the "Registrant")
      on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dale B. Shafer,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.




*/s/
      Dale B. Shafer*




Dale
      B.
      Shafer


Interim
      Chief Financial Officer




March
      15,
      2007
254 La. 7

#### Arthur CARTER v. Catherine FOREMAN, wife of/and Jerome Foreman Community Construction Company, Inc. and Clover Investment Corporation.

No. 49769.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 9, 1969.

In re: Arthur Carter applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 219 So.2d 21.

The application is denied. There appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 1, 2016

p0329

Order 

Clerk

April 1, 2016

152562

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 152562

COA: 316467

Wayne CC: 08-009312-FC

DAVID ROARK,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 20, 2015

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). 

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order 

addressing the following issues: (1) whether the defendant was accurately advised of the 

direct consequences of his guilty plea, including lifetime electronic monitoring; (2) 

whether the defendant has demonstrated actual prejudice pursuant to 

MCR 6.508(D)(3)(b); and in particular, (3) whether the defendant must demonstrate that 

he would not have pleaded guilty if he had known about the lifetime electronic 

monitoring requirement. See, e.g., United States v Timmreck, 441 US 780, 783-784; 99 S 

Ct 2085; 60 L Ed 2d 634 (1979) (holding that a conviction based on a guilty plea is not 

subject to collateral attack when all that can be shown is a formal violation of Rule 11); 

Williams v Smith, 591 F 2d 169 (CA 2, 1979) (recognizing that the test applied by the 

Second Circuit for determining the constitutional validity of a state court guilty plea that 

was based on inaccurate sentencing information is whether the defendant was aware of 

actual sentencing possibilities, and, if not, whether accurate information would have 

made any difference in his decision to enter a plea). The parties should not submit mere 

restatements of their application papers.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          35,039
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,051,337
<ALLOWANCES>                                    26,301
<INVENTORY>                                    800,002
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,911,983
<PP&E>                                       7,558,948
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,245,917
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,706,548
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,234,285
<BONDS>                                      2,070,047
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,014,110
<OTHER-SE>                                     751,019
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,706,548
<SALES>                                      8,592,368
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,592,368
<CGS>                                        6,059,269
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,059,269
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,556,392
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                23,815
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             151,419
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (141,513)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (56,345)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (85,168)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (85,168)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
**Agricultural Chemical Usage, Fruits Summary (9X172)**
Exhibit 32.1   Suncrest Global Energy Corp.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Suncrest Global Energy Corp. (the Company)  certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  a. the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  b. the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date: February 16, 2007 /s/ John W. Peters John W. Peters Principal Executive Officer Principal Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
                                    FORM 10-Q

[ X ]  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
       EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                                       or
[   ]  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
       EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the period MAY 28 TO JUNE 30, 1999


                        Commission File Number: 000-26091
                                TC PIPELINES, LP
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



                 Delaware                                52-2135448
      -------------------------------               ---------------------
      (State or other jurisdiction of                 (I.R.S. Employer
       incorporation or organization)               Identification Number)




          Four Greenspoint Plaza
          16945 Northchase Drive
              Houston, Texas                               77060
----------------------------------------            ---------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                 (Zip code)



                               (281) 873-7774
             --------------------------------------------------
             Registrant's telephone number, including area code


     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such report(s), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [ ]



     THE REGISTRANT HAD 14,690,694 COMMON UNITS OUTSTANDING AS OF AUGUST 31,
1999.


<PAGE>

                           PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

                                TC PIPELINES, LP


ITEM 6.   Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)  Exhibits.

     Exhibit 27.

(b)  Reports on Form 8-K.

     None.


<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                  TC PIPELINES, LP
                                  (a Delaware Limited Partnership)

                                  By: TC PipeLines GP, Inc., its general partner

                                  By: /s/
                                      -------------------------------------
Date: August 31, 1999                 Theresa Jang
                                      Controller
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46254-46255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23144]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-258-003]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

August 26, 1997
    Take notice that on August 20, 1997, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(WNG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets:

Effective May 1, 1997
    Substitute Fifth Revised Sheet No. 1
    Substitute Seventh Revised Sheet No. 2
    First Revised Sheet No. 105
    Second Revised Sheet Nos. 106 and 114
    First Revised Sheet No. 120
    Second Revised Sheet Nos. 121 and 126
    Third Revised Sheet No. 131
    Second Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 132
    Second Revised Sheet No. 136
    Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 138
    Second Revised Sheet No. 141
    Second Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 144
    Second Substitute First Revised Sheet Nos. 145 and 146
    Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 210
    Third Revised Sheet No. 226A
    Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 230
    Second Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 458
    Substitute Original Sheet Nos. 458A and 458C
    Second Substitute Original Sheet Nos. 458B and 458D
    Second Revised Sheet Nos. 467-470
    Third Revised Sheet No. 471
    Second Revised Sheet Nos. 472-474
Effective August 1, 1997
    Substitute Fourth Revised Sheet No. 233

    WNG states that on May 12, 1997, it made a compliance filing in 
Docket No. RP97-258-001. By order issued July 21, 1997, the Commission 
accepted the compliance filing to be effective May 1, 1997, subject to 
WNG filing within 30 days of the date of the order, tariff sheets that 
provide that gas nominated into and out of pools will receive the same 
priority as the underlying transportation contracts, and that gas may 
be nominated directly from the production area pool into the market 
area. The instant filing is being made to comply with the order.
    WNG states that a copy of its filing was served on all participants 
listed on the service list maintained by the Commission in the docket 
referenced above and on all jurisdictional customers and interested 
state commissions.
    Any persons desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the

[[Page 46255]]

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, 
D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23144 Filed 8-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Charles W. RABORN et al. v. BIENVILLE PARISH POLICE JURY.

No. 61608.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 24, 1978.

In re: Charles W. Raborn, et al, applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. Parish of Bien-ville. 353 So.2d 1102.

Writ denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-41030 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PEDRO VALLE-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CR-176-1

-------------------- June 13, 2000 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: * Pedro Valle-Gonzalez appeals his conviction of unlawfully attempting to reenter the United States after having been deported, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues only that the indictment was insufficient because it failed to allege that he specifically intended to enter the United States unlawfully. As Valle-Gonzalez acknowledges, this argument is forestalled by this court’s holding in United States v. Trevino-Martinez , 86 F.3d 65, 69 (5th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, his conviction is
AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
32.1





SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





In connection with the quarterly report
of Global Food Technologies, Inc. ("Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. Section 1350) that to their knowledge:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Global Food Technologies, Inc and
will be retained by Global Food Technologies, Inc and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated    May
13, 2009





/s/ Keith
Meeks







Keith
Meeks, President and Chief Executive Officer





/s/
Marshall F Sparks







Marshall
F. Sparks, Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22843]



[[Page 45398]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 081997B]


Gulf of Maine Aquaculture-Pinniped Interaction Task Force

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of availability of report.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), 
NMFS submitted a report to Congress regarding pinnipeds interacting in 
a dangerous or damaging manner with aquaculture resources in the Gulf 
of Maine. The report, which addressed public comments on an earlier 
draft, is available to the public upon request.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the report are available from Chief, Habitat and 
Protected Resources Division, NMFS, One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 
01930, or Chief, Marine Mammal Division, Office of Protected Resources, 
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Sandorf (508)281-9388 or Tom 
Eagle (301) 713-2322.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Pursuant to section 120(h) of the MMPA, NMFS convened a Task Force 
to examine the issues and problems associated with pinniped-aquaculture 
interactions in the Gulf of Maine. Task Force members were selected 
from the aquaculture industry, state government, the scientific 
community, and conservation organizations. The Task Force convened 
three times for multi-day meetings, visited pen-sites, conducted public 
hearings, met with salmon growers, conducted surveys, and reviewed 
literature related to the issue, prior to completion of its report. The 
report contained Task Force recommendations to mitigate the seal 
predation, all of which represented the consensus of the Task Force.
    NMFS considered the recommendations from the Task Force and 
prepared a draft report to Congress recommending options available to 
mitigate the interaction. NMFS published a notice of availability of 
the draft report and solicited public comments on it (62 FR 12602, 
March 17, 1997).
    NMFS used the public comments in preparing a final report to 
Congress and forwarded the report to the Department of Commerce. The 
Secretary of Commerce transmitted the report to Congress on August 1, 
1997. Copies of the report are now available to the public (see 
ADDRESSES).

    Dated: August 21, 1997.
Hilda Diaz-Soltero,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 97-22843 Filed 8-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F