alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Image Sensing
System, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I,
Gregory R.L. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                         
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
| |    |                                                                                                                                                         
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of the Company.

| |                                                              
| | -------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Gregory R.L. Smith                                       
| |                                                              
| | Gregory R.L. Smith
  Chief Financial Officer
  March 29, 2007

44

---
# Construction Begins on DSCR’s New East Gate

/ Published June 11, 2018
Richmond, Va., 
In an effort to comply with current anti-terrorism standards, Defense Logistics Agency Installation Operations Richmond is embarking on a $6 million project to replace the East Gate. The new gate will be located near the former housing area adjacent to Jefferson Davis Highway on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. The work began this month and is expected to be completed by August 2019.

Alexander Vasquez, general engineer, Installation Management Division, DLA Installation Operations Richmond, said the existing gate will remain “for historical reasons,” and may be used in emergencies or at the discretion of base management. “However, the norm will be that the new East Gate will be used on a daily basis once completed,” said Vasquez.

New gate construction will affect nearby parking, he noted. “Parking is being impacted to the extent that the old family housing area and portions of Parking Lot 2 have been closed because they are in the footprint of the construction project. Nevertheless, we have mitigated this situation by closely analyzing and planning where, and how, parking will be available to the center workforce.”

Vasquez said some parking will be available in a portion of Lot 2 that is not taken up by construction, as well as along H Road and in the gravel lot next to Building 31. For additional parking options, installation employees should contact Penny Holcomb, supervisor program analyst, Installation Management Division, DLA Installation Operations at Richmond, at 804-279-2695.

At present, nearby utilities are being marked on the project site, and installation of a temporary fence around the project site is expected to begin soon, followed by gate construction. Vasquez said the total cost of construction is $6,253,160, and funded by the Military Construction program. Once complete, the gate can be accessed by all employees and visitors who possess valid Department of Defense identification cards. Visitors will still be required to enter the installation through the North Gate.

“The construction of the East Access Control Point [new East Gate] will provide for more secure base access and for smoother flow of traffic to and from the East Gate area of the base.” Vasquez said.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 163 (Friday, August 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22557]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Federal Maritime Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m.--August 27, 1997.

PLACE: 800 North Capitol Street, N.W., Room 905, Washington, D.C.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTER(S) TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Docket No. 96-20--Port Restrictions and Requirements in the United 
States/Japan Trade
2. Panama Port Privatization Issues
3. Docket No. 94-01--Ceres Marine Terminal, Inc. v. Maryland Port 
Administration--Consideration of the Record.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Joseph C. Polking, Secretary, 
(202) 523-5725.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22557 Filed 8-20-97; 2:52 pm]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
**TISSERA      INC.**

**(A      development stage company)**

**Exhibit      32.1**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities  Exchange                Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                  Date: June 20,                2008 | By:    | /s/                *Amos                Eiran*                                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                     |                  | Amos                EiranChief                Executive Officer (principal executive                officer) |

----
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

_________________________________ 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

FANICE ANDREA REED, 

a/k/a Fanice Jones, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 22-1008 

(D.C. No. 1:21-CR-00142-CMA-1) 

(D. Colo.) 

_________________________________ 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

_________________________________ 

Before BACHARACH, KELLY, and ROSSMAN, Circuit Judges. 

_________________________________ 

Fanice Andrea Reed pleaded guilty to theft or conversion of government 

property in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. She was sentenced to serve 27 months in 

prison. Although her plea agreement contained a waiver of her appellate rights, she 

filed a notice of appeal. The government has moved to enforce the appeal waiver in 

the plea agreement pursuant to United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004) 

(en banc) (per curiam). 

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines 

of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for 

its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

August 10, 2022

Christopher M. Wolpert 

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 22-1008 Document: 010110722758 Date Filed: 08/10/2022 Page: 1
2 

Under Hahn, we consider “(1) whether the disputed appeal falls within the 

scope of the waiver of appellate rights; (2) whether the defendant knowingly and 

voluntarily waived [her] appellate rights; and (3) whether enforcing the waiver would 

result in a miscarriage of justice.” Id. at 1325. The government asserts that all of the 

Hahn conditions have been satisfied. 

Appellate counsel for Ms. Reed filed a response and motion to withdraw 

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), conceding “that any 

appeal [including any opposition to the Motion to Enforce] would be wholly 

frivolous.” Resp. at 1 (internal quotation marks omitted). Ms. Reed has also filed a 

brief pro se response in which she expresses dissatisfaction with trial counsel’s 

representation, but acknowledges that “to move forward” with an ineffective 

assistance of counsel claim, “[she] would need to file a [28 U.S.C. §] 2255 [motion]” 

in district court. Pro Se Resp. at 1. She does not offer any arguments in response to 

the government’s motion to enforce or otherwise challenge her appellate counsel’s 

determination that any opposition to the motion to enforce would be frivolous. 

Based on counsel’s and Ms. Reed’s concessions and our independent review of 

the record, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, grant the government’s motion to 

enforce the appeal waiver, and dismiss the appeal. This dismissal does not affect 

Ms. Reed’s right to pursue post-conviction relief on the grounds permitted in her plea 

agreement. 

Entered for the Court 

Per Curiam 

Appellate Case: 22-1008 Document: 010110722758 Date Filed: 08/10/2022 Page: 2
U . S.I)epor"-"of Transportation**O~t ce**  or**r: e**  S.eoeff.lr y Of**ro~ ~O'::>** **".J' Qf)**  Chief. Documentary Services Div. Department of Transportation Washington. 

### D . C . 20590 DESIGNATION OF AGENT FOR SERVICE OF NOTICE. PROCESS. ORDERS DECISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS

ATTENTION : DOCKET SECTION. C-55 Aeronexus Corporate (PTY) Ltd (Name of Company. please prin!l office at

# ~8l94, 

# &vfAN C4-. .- J

. t.7 ((.)I"' ( (Address) . ha" · ing its principal

hereby designates. pursuant to section 46103 of Title 49 of the U.S . Code tformerly section lOO:'it hl of the Federal A\ iation Act of 1958. as amended I the person named t>.:low as its Agenl upon \\·hom**sen i~** **c:** of all notices and pn:x:es., ,. and all onJ.:r,_ decision ... . and requirements of the Department of-Transportation may 

### bl: m<1de for and on behalf of said carrier . hereby canc.:ling all pre' inus designations of**agent~** made by 

### it 

### to the DOT. Joanne 

### W. Young, Kiretein & Young, PLLC Name of Agent

### ----------------~-------------------------------------------------------- (Please Print) 1750 K Street NW, Ste. 200; Washington, DC 20006 Address
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Agent so designated has written his name and also his initials in the following space : Name

------------------------------------- (Initials)
---------------- 

### IN WITNESS WHEREOF . ___ A_e_r_o_n_e_x_u_s_c_o.::.p_o_r_a_t_e_(_P_T_Y_)_L_t_d ______________ has caused these
presents to be signed in its name by (Name of Company)



# __**S:::::::._;_Vi~CN~___:::J::__ __!_p-=e]i~EJ2£=** **· =-..:E::....:_;)\1~---·**  President (Please Print) 

### of said company. and to 

### be attested under its corporate 

### seal 

### by (Secretary. or other Title) on this 

### ---+'......L-- day of ___

# ~,__---'~-==-k(l--OL_Lvf_, __ i'Y' 

# _2QJ3.

I

# ATTES~**'** . - __. .... .**\Tt: "'"'** **'** 

# :**~p> --** **-<<~, -,** **~"lLL~ E:;~US** **caf~** 

# f( (; : . ' "**,, ~'i** **)** 

# < ;:::;;:;.il By

# Sl{~ 

# pef**~**

__ __. (President} (Name of Company)

(Secretary . or other officer) OST F 1010.5 (1-95)
# DLA encourages R&D partnerships at October Industry Day

/ Published Sept. 25, 2017

Logistics leaders from the Defense Logistics Agency Research and Development division will host the second annual Industry Day Oct. 3 at the McNamara Headquarters Complex. In keeping with DLA’s “Warfighter First” strategic goal, R&D representatives will brief industry and academia on opportunities to support the warfighter through innovation.

Key topics at the Fort Belvoir event will include program requirements for R&D’s manufacturing technology and logistics processes, as well as research involving small businesses.

Manufacturing technology focuses on boosting the operational performance of key supply chains. It seeks to improve food packaging and storage, extend battery life for weapon systems and ensure a ready supply of difficult-to-source microcircuits at a sustainable cost.

Logistics development explores innovative supply chain processes such as 3D printing of critical parts, alternative fuels, and medical-logistics capabilities.DLA R&D program managers will present key program requirements and discuss in group breakouts throughout the morning. In the afternoon, R&D will offer an open house for DLA leadership and stakeholders.

“Industry Day showcases our customers’ highest priorities... across each of our programs with logistics performers from industry and academia,” said Navy Cdr. Andres Diaz, deputy chief of DLA R&D.

The first R&D/Industry Day was September 2016 and featured several dozen attendees from small and large businesses, as well as academic institutions.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2280]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking 
company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the 
nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC 
Act, including whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices'' (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 24, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (Lloyd W. Bostian, Jr., Senior 
Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. First Union Corporation, Charlotte, North Carolina; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of Boca Raton First National Bank, 
Boca Raton, Florida.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (John E. Yorke, Senior Vice 
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Community Bankshares, Inc., Denver, Colorado; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of First Western National Bank, La Jara, 
Colorado.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 24, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-2280 Filed 1-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
#### L.E.M., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 98-956.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 21, 1998.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Suzanne M. Froix, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Fredericka Sands, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, GREEN and FLETCHER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Given the totality of the circumstances, we conclude that the school official had reasonable suspicion to conduct a search of the appellant juvenile. *See New Jersey v. T.L.O.,*469 U.S. 325, 341-43, 105 S.Ct. 733, 83 L.Ed.2d 720 (1985); *A.S. v. State,*693 So.2d 1095, 1095 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); *State v. D.T.W.,*425 So.2d 1383, 1386-87 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). We therefore, find no error in the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s motion to suppress.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Inconnection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of theReport of Cintas Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period endingMay 31, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Scott D. Farmer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of my knowledge:

(1)            TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)            Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Scott D. Farmer         |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| Scott D. Farmer             |
| Principal Executive Officer |
|                        |
| August 11, 2006             |

 

1

----
----

----

| 1.  | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.    | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the LP. |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 5, 2009                                                                      |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                           |   |   |
| /s/ Anthony J. Branca                                                                          |   |   |
| Anthony J. Branca                                                                              |   |   |
| Chief Financial OfficerICON Capital Corp.General Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight B L.P. |
# Medical team bonds despite working away from the office

/ Published May 8, 2018
PHILADELPHIA, 
A gaggle took off at the starting point of the 5K and then quickly weaved through traffic to get to the front. However, while they focused on reaching their ideal pace, one group of runners hung in the back of the crowd with a different motive.

Members of a team from the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Medical supply chain participated by walking together and used the time to discuss each other’s lives outside of work.

“The 5K gets our team outdoors, without any other distractions, where we can just talk about things other than work,” Tom Revak, a Medical operational customer facing division member, said. “It gives us a chance to learn about each other’s ‘non-work’ lives and form stronger bonds.”

In an environment where employees don’t often gather in the office, due to telework and alternate work schedules, division employees are making efforts to ensure they perform as a team.

Randy Owens, Medical’s operational customer facing division supervisor, began incorporating quarterly team building activities to develop relationships and instill pride within the team.

The division is responsible for providing medical supplies support to operational forces deployed globally.

“Since team members will telework multiple times a week, our team building exercises rein everyone back in and reconnect us,” Owens said.

The team tries various activities, both on and off base, to keep members engaged and to have fun, including miniature golf, dining out and, most recently, the 5K.

Several members believe the team building activities are an opportunity to build trust and rapport with their fellow coworkers.

“To have a group of employees who go once a quarter as a group for team building events is exhilarating, not only building character, but team cohesion as well,” said James Monroe, a tailored vendor logistics specialist in the division. “It warms my heart to know these men and women will go to bat for one another without hesitation.”

The activities also allow them to share personal and professional experiences with those who may be facing similar situations.

“Being able to know and understand each other on a personal basis promotes a healthy work relationship,” Alfonso Mitchell-Rios, also a TVLS, said. “Team building, with both peers and supervisors, could help a person overcome their fears or obstacles. You never know who shared the same experiences and can give a word of encouragement.”

Owens expects that the more cohesive his team is, the better they’ll perform their warfighter support mission.

“I hope my employees come away with a renewed sense of team cohesiveness and esprit de corps,” Owens said. “Our agency can only benefit from a close knit team that works and plays well together. We have each other’s backs, and know how to help each other out in accomplishing our mission.”
#### SMITH v. MEMORIAL HOME COMMUNITY.

No. 37940.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 214 So.2d *77.*
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0483. NORA ISAAC BOSTICK, JR. v. DESIREE A. FERRANTE.

Nora Isaac Bostick, Jr., filed this application for discretionary appeal seeking

to appeal the denial of his “Request for a Waiver of Advance Payment of Court

Costs.” Although the application includes a copy of the order sought to be appealed,

it does not contain a stamped “filed” copy of the order as required by Court of

Appeals Rule 31 (c), and without it, we are unable to ascertain whether the filing is

timely. On May 17, 2019, this Court ordered Bostick to supplement his application

with a stamped “filed” copy of the order sought to be appealed within 10 days or the

application would be dismissed. No stamped “filed” order has been filed within the

time allowed. Therefore, this application is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

June 04, 2019

06/04/2019