alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 165 (Tuesday, August 26, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 45199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22666]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81

[IN83-1b; FRL-5882-7]


Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Indiana

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to approve a redesignation request 
submitted by the State of Indiana on April 8, 1993, and supplemented on 
June 17, 1997. In this submittal, Indiana submitted a maintenance plan 
and requested that a portion of Vermillion County be redesignated to 
attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for 
particulate matter with an aerometric diameter less than 10 micrometers 
(PM-10). In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is 
approving the State's SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior 
proposal because the agency views this as a noncontroversial SIP 
revision and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for 
the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no written 
adverse comments are received in response to this proposed rule, no 
further activity is contemplated in relation to this rule. If EPA 
receives written adverse comments, the direct final rule will be 
withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a 
subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not 
institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties 
interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received in writing by September 25, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the revision request are available for inspection 
at the following address: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 
5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604. (It is recommended that you telephone Ryan Bahr at 
(312) 353-4366 before visiting the Region 5 Office.)
    Written comments should be sent to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief, 
Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch AR-18J, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago 
Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Bahr, Environmental Engineer, at 
(312) 353-4366.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the information provided in the Direct 
Final action of the same title which is located in the Rules and 
Regulations Section of this Federal Register.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

    Dated: August 14, 1997.
David A. Ullrich,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-22666 Filed 8-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004


In connection with the Quarterly Report of IEH Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Knoth,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectfully certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of the section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Robert Knoth
------------------------
Robert Knoth
Chief Financial Officer, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer

August 10, 2006


                                       30
STEVE MORRISSEY

MANAGING DIRECTOR—REGULATORY AND POLICY

(202) 296-2733 

(202) 296-2873 FAX

STEVE.MORRISSEY@UNITED.COM

January 19, 2011 

Esta Rosenberg, Chief 

U.S. Carrier Licensing Division 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: Blanket Statement of Authorization of Continental Airlines, Inc. and Air New Zealand 

Limited (Docket DOT-OST-2009-0340) 

 

Dear Ms. Rosenberg: 

 

 Pursuant to the blanket Statement of Authorization granted by the Department to 

Continental Airlines, Inc. (“Continental”) and Air New Zealand Limited (“ANZ”) on January 26, 

2010 (Docket DOT-OST-2009-0340), this notice is to advise the Department that ANZ’s “NZ” 

designator code will be placed on Continental-operated flights between Los Angeles, CAGuadalajara, Mexico. 

 The proposed code-share services are fully consistent with applicable bilateral 

agreements. The carriers intend to implement these services on or after February 18, 2011. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 Steve Morrissey

 Managing Director, Regulatory & Policy 

UNITED AIR LINES, INC. AND 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. 

cc: George Wellington Linda Lundell Dan Weiss 

Brian Hedberg Charles Hunnicutt 

 Brett Kruger Susan Gotbetter 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing document on all 

persons named below by causing a copy to be sent via email: 

 

barbara.russell@virginamerica.com 

carl.nelson@aa.com 

dkirstein@yklaw.com 

jeff.morgan@delta.com 

jyoung@yklaw.com (Spirit) 

donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov 

dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil 

efaberman@wileyrein.com (Air Tran/Frontier)

howard.kass@usairways.com 

jhill@dowlohnes.com (Hawaiian/Jet Blue)

john.allen@faa.gov 

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com 

msinick@ssd.com (Alaska)

pmurphy@lopmurphy.com (USA 3000)

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

urskr@state.gov 

william.stallings@usdoj.gov 

Annalei Avanceña 

Dated: January 19, 2011
* Pursuant to the 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinio n should not be published and is not precedent except under limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

1 Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 19, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20304 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EDGAR Galicia-Moreno, also know as Rolando Sanchez Martinez, also known as Rolands Martinez, also know as Rolando S. Martinez, also know as Edgar Moreno Galicia, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-182-ALL Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel, Thomas A. Martin, moves for leave to withdraw and filed an Anders 1 brief in support of his motion. Galicia-Moreno did not file a response. After review both of counsel’s brief and of the record, we conclude that no2 See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. 2

nonfrivolous issues remain for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 158 (Friday, August 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21663]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Southwest Oregon Provincial Interagency Executive Committee 
(PIEC), Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Southwest Oregon PIEC Advisory Committee will meet on 
August 26 at the Illinois Valley Visitor Center in Cave Junction, 
Oregon. The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. and continue until 5:00 
p.m. The meeting will be primarily a field tour.
    Agenda its to be covered include: (1) Marbled Murrelet habitat; (2) 
information management; (3) Regional Ecosystem Office presentation; (4) 
Forest Service and National Park local issues; (5) Oregon Caves tour; 
and (6) field stops for mining issues. All Province Advisory Committee 
meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens need to contact 
Chuck Anderson ahead of time for this field trip.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct questions regarding this meeting to Chuck Anderson, Province 
Advisory Committee staff, USDA, Forest Service,Rogue River National 
Forest, 333 W. 8th Street, Medford, Oregon 97501, phone 541-858-2322.

    Dated: August 7, 1997.
Charles J. Anderson,
Acting Forest Supervisor, Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 97-21663 Filed 8-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1497 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to provide incidental take permits 

to public electric utilities that adopt avian protection plans. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 26, 2005 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself and Mr. STEVENS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to provide incidental 

take permits to public electric utilities that adopt avian 

protection plans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCIDENTAL TAKE PERMITS FOR PUBLIC ELEC4 TRIC UTILITIES WITH AVIAN PROTECTION 

5 PLANS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the Act of June 

7 8, 1940 (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.) (commonly known as the 

8 ‘‘Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act’’) and the Migra9 tory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.), the Sec-
2 

•S 1497 IS

1 retary of the Interior shall provide an incidental take per2 mit to a public electric utility that has adopted an avian 

3 protection plan, if the Secretary determines that the public 

4 utility has included in the plan specific measures to miti5 gate hazards to eagles and other migratory birds. 

6 (b) PENALTIES.—Any public utility that receives an 

7 incidental take permit under this section (including an of8 ficer, director, or employee of the public utility) shall not 

9 be subject to criminal or civil penalty under an Act re10 ferred to in subsection (a) for the incidental death by elec11 trocution of a bird described in subsection (a)(1) by a 

12 power line of the public utility during the period the per13 mit is in effect. 

Æ
**List by Subject: Inputs, Technology, and WeatherReports are indicated with the symbol Datasets are marked with the symbol 
Acid Rain in the Northeastern U.S. (ERS)Agricultural Chemical Usage (NASS)Agricultural Chemical Usage, Field Crop Summary (NASS)Agricultural Chemical Usage, Fruits Summary (NASS)Agricultural Chemical Usage, Vegetable Summary (NASS)Agricultural productivity in the U.S. (ERS)Cropping Practices Survey Data (ERS)Farm Computer Usage and Ownership (NASS)Farm Machinery Statistics (ERS)Industrial Uses of Agricultural Materials (ERS)Inputs Data of Selected Former Soviet Republics (ERS)Ozone in the Northeastern U.S. (ERS)Pest Management Practices (NASS)Production and Efficiency Statistics (ERS)Selected Fertilizer Use Data (ERS)U.S. Corn and Soybean Weather/Production Models (ERS)Weather and Yield (ERS)Weather in U.S. Agriculture (ERS)Weekly Weather & Crop Bulletin. (NASS)USDA Economics and Statistics System
**
July 12, 2012 

Ms. Aloha Ley 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, W86-310 

Washington, DC 20590 

Venice Area Board of REAL TORS®, Inc 

680 Substation· Road 

Venice, FL 34285 

Phone: 941-484-0614, Fax: 941-484-1974 

Re: Small Community Air Service Development Program 

Docket DOT-OST-2012-0069 _ 

Sarasota Bradenton Iiltemational Airport (SRQ) 

Dear Ms. Ley: 

I am writing as President of the Venice Area Board of REAL TORS®, Inc. to express our strong 

support for the above referenced grant application to the Small Community Air Service · 

Development Program. The recent decision by Southwest Airlines to pull AirTran service from 

SRQ is a major blow to the air service and economic competitiveness of the entire region 

served by Sarasota Bradenton International Airport. AirTran accounted for over 360,000 

passengers or nearly 30% of all passenger traffic at SRQ in 2011. · 

Sarasota Bradenton ~lso suffers from.-a lack of access to a westbound airline gateway. This 

· · forces local consumers to drive to other airports, thereby inflicting economic damage on the 

local economy. 

. A 1997 Economic Impact Study completed as part of tl:le SRQ Master Plan Update revealed 

that 57% of all enplanements at SRQ were out of area visitors spending an average of $665.00. 

per visit. Using the CY 2011 AirTran passenger traffic this equates to 102,600 visitors to the 

SRQ area. When combined with the 100,000 passengers lost due to no westbound service this 

equates to a loss of over $105;000,000 of direct visitor expenditures annually. When the 

multiplier effect is factored in it equates to a loss of nearly $285,000,000 of economic impact 

and 2,600 jobs to the area. 

The community is partnering with the airport to match the grant funds dollar for dollar on this 

critical matter. We ask the Department consider the serious neg,ative effects the recent approval 

provided to Southwest Airlines to acquire AirTran Airways has had on our community and 

approve the application for assistance. Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

I .., ~-

Roxie Larain, President 

Venice Area Board of REALTORS®, Inc. 

cc: The Honorable Ray H. LaHood, Secretary of Transportation 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

'
# C&T provides winter clothes to Syrians returning home

/ Published Feb. 13, 2018
PHILADELPHIA, 

Nearly 15,000 internally displaced persons returning to a liberated Raqqah, Syria, received winter clothes and blankets provided by the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support.

DLA Troop Support’s Clothing and Textiles supply chain supported the U.S. Agency for International Development’s humanitarian support request for 2,500 winter clothing kits by mid-January.

“The expectation was that these people would be returning home and wouldn’t have these items [for winter],” C&T contracting officer Joseph Szwec said.

As of 2017, more than 6 million Syrians have been internally displaced since the civil war began there in 2011, according to the United Nations. 

Since 2014, U.S. military forces and coalition partners have combated Islamic State of Iraq and Syria forces in northern and central Iraq and northern Syria, according to the Department of Defense website. The city of Raqqah, located on the northwest bank of the Euphrates River, is now inhabitable for its returning population.

Szwec supported C&T contracting officer Randy McArthur who led the acquisition, from market research of item availability in November to coordinating a military convoyed delivery to Raqqah in late December. 

USAID chose DOD to meet this emergency request because the military was able to securely access most parts of the city that civilian humanitarian agencies could not, according to a USAID document.

While an acquisition of this scope typically takes three to five months to complete, McArthur and his team completed the request within three weeks, he said.

C&T then contracted a U.S.-based company with global resources to assemble and distribute kits of blankets, winter boots, socks, gloves, hats, jackets, sweat shirts and sweat pants for men, women and children. 

“All of those items were condensed into one kit for a household of six,” McArthur said. “And they made it [to Raqqah] three weeks ahead of time.”
EXHIBIT 10.26





                                    AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                              CONSULTING AGREEMENT

                  Amendment,  dated  November 13, 1997, to Consulting  Agreement
(the "Consulting Agreement") dated December 1, 1994, as amended (the "Consulting
Agreement"),  between MEDCO RESEARCH,  INC. (the  "Corporation")  and RICHARD C.
WILLIAMS ("Williams").
                  WHEREAS, the Compensation  Committee of the Board of Directors
of the Corporation (the  "Compensation  Committee") has determined that it is in
the best interests of the Corporation for the Corporation to continue to consult
with Williams pursuant to the Consulting Agreement for up to one additional year
on the terms set forth below; and

                  WHEREAS,  Williams is willing so to  continue to consult  with
the Corporation;

                  NOW,  THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of the  mutual  covenants
contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:

                  1. Section 1 of the Consulting  Agreement is hereby amended by
(a) deleting in the first  sentence  thereof  "1997" and  substituting  therefor
"1998"  and (b)  adding  the  following  proviso  at the  end of  such  Section:
"provided,  however,  that based on its  review of the needs of the  Corporation
between July 1 and December 31, 1998, the Corporation's  Executive Committee, in
its  sole  discretion,  shall  have  the  right to  unilaterally  terminate  the
Agreement  effective  at any time on or after  June  30,  1998 on 30 days  prior
written  notice to  Williams,  and  Williams  agrees  that the  decision of such
Committee shall be final, conclusive and binding upon him."

                  2. Section 3.1 of the  Consulting  Agreement is hereby amended
by deleting  in the first  sentence  thereof  "1997" and  substituting  therefor
"1998".

                  3.  Except  as  expressly   amended  hereby,   the  Consulting
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

                  IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties  hereto have  executed  this
agreement as of the date first above written.

                                          /s/ Richard C. Williams
                                          -----------------------
                                          Richard C. Williams



                                          MEDCO RESEARCH, INC.



                                          By: /s/ Roger D. Blevins
                                             ------------------------
                                              Roger D. Blevins, President
                                                and Chief Executive Officer
#### State of Missouri, *ex rel.,*John Wilson, Pub. Adm’r, etc., Appellant, *vs.*S. C. Dodson, *et al.,*Respondents.

1. *Action, expel adrar.*— Interest *of State must be shown.*— In a suit brought in the name of the State on the relation of the public administrator, the petition failing to show that the State has. any interest in the subject matter of the suit is fatally defective on demurrer.

*Appeal from McDonald Circuit Court.*

*Bray & Cravens,*for Appellant,

cited: State to use Worth Co. vs. Patton, 42 Mo. 580.

*C. W. Thrasher,*for Respondent.

Norton, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a suit instituted in the circuit court of McDonald county by plaintiff, who charges in his petition that defendants, by their written obligation, agreed to pay the public administrator the sum of $389,38 upon the condition that if Dodson,,one of the defendants, should obey the order of the probate court of said county and pay said sum of $389.38 to the public administrator or any part thereof, whenever an order to that effect should be made by said court, the bond should be void, otherwise to be of full force. It is further charged that the probate court did make an o/der requiring said Dodson to pay said sum to the public administrator, and that the defendant has failed to pay said sum or *452any part thereof to John Wilson, who was public administrator. Defendant filed his demurrer to plaintiff’s petition, which was sustained by the court and final judgment entered for defendants. From this judgment plaintiff has appealed.

The petition fails entirely to show that the State in whose name the suit was brought has any interest, as trustee or otherwise, in the subject matter of the suit. On the contrary, it charges that the promise was made to the public administrator. The petition does not show that the obligation on which the suit was founded was such an obligation as the law requires to be made payable to the State, and it is difficult to determine from the allegations made therein, the precise nature of the instrument sued on.

The petition failing to show by any averment that the State was a trustee of an express trust, or had any interest whatever in the suit, the judgment of the court in sustaining the demurrer must be affirmed. (19 Mo. 369; 21 Mo. 112.)

Judgment affirmed.

The other judges concur.
#### Allen JOHNSON v. ALLRIGHT NEW ORLEANS, INC., (Two Cases).

No. 62015.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 5, 1978.

In re: Allen Johnson, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 357 So.2d 1210.

Writ denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          10,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,833
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      5,419
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          53,440
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            53,931
<LOANS>                                        177,794
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,145
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 265,980
<DEPOSITS>                                     232,172
<SHORT-TERM>                                     9,642
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                980
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,250
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,936
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 265,980
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,566
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,474
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   617
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                20,657
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,603
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,052
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,605
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      839
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (341)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,561
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,756
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,414
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,414
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.41
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.71
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,194
<LOANS-PAST>                                       781
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,985
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      714
<RECOVERIES>                                        35
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,145
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,255
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            890
        

</TABLE>