alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hartmarx Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Homi B. Patel, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ HOMI B. PATELName:

Homi B. PatelTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:

February 24, 2004
#### Thomas H. STARK and Louis Pohlman, Appellants, v. ORANGE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, Inc., and George Marcus, Appellees.

No. 69-647.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Nov. 28, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; B. C. Muszynski, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
DLA personnel brave Belgian cold, honor WWII heroes in memorial walk
 
  By Jim White, DLA Europe & Africa
  Members of the DLA Europe & Africa Team braved the winter weather Dec. 16 to participate in the 40th Annual Bastogne Memorial Walk at Bastogne, Belgium.  This event commemorates the heroic stand made by the 101st Airborne Division and Combat Command B, 10th Armored Division during the December 1944 Ardennes Offensive — more popularly known as the Battle of the Bulge.  The Battle of the Bulge was the last large-scale Nazi offensive in the West. Attacking along an 85-mile front of the Ardennes region of Belgium and Luxembourg, the overwhelming Nazi force sought to split the British and American armies and reach the English Channel.  Fighting tenaciously and suffering heavy casualties, the American defenders of the 28th, 106th, 9th Armored, 2nd and 4th Infantry Divisions bought precious time which allowed Allied reinforcements to arrive.  Among these reinforcements were Combat Command B, 10th Armored Division and the “Screaming Eagles” of the 101st Airborne Division, who on Dec. 18 and 19 arrived at the town of Bastogne — a critical road network hub in the Ardennes.  Although surrounded, outnumbered and short on ammunition, winter clothing, fuel, and medical supplies, the tankers and airborne troopers proceeded to throw back everything the Nazis threw at them. At one point during the siege, the Nazis appealed to the “well known American sense of humanity” to demand their surrender. In reply, acting 101st Division Commander Army Brig. Gen. Anthony McAuliffe, responded with one word: “NUTS!”  Today Bastogne remains a quiet agricultural and transportation hub in western Belgium. However, the people of Belgium remember with gratitude the sacrifices Americans made for them in these desperate days of 1944.  Since 1977, the citizens of Bastogne honor those sacrifices by hosting the Annual Bastogne Memorial Walk. The walk covers distances of 7, 12 and 20 km., circling the area held the Americans held during the siege.  This year, the route encompassed the scene of the landing zones and drop zones used during aerial resupply operations and the site of the Nazi attack on Christmas Day, which saw the complete destruction of a German tank and mechanized infantry battalions.  The memorial event also includes military reenactments, a patriotic ceremony and a parade featuring World War II vehicles, veterans and military groups, ending at the Town Hall with the symbolic throwing of nuts — in honor of McAuliffe’s memorable reply.  Though damp, cold and a bit footsore by the end of the day, the DLA Europe & Africa participants took pride in being able to honor their comrades and come away with some small sense of the conditions these brave men endured in those cold, dark days of December 1944.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00322

- CV
HSPS, LLC and Samuel B. LaVergne v. Dixie Pipe Sales, Inc.

On Appeal from the 267th District Court of Victoria County , Texas Trial Cause No. 20

- 02

- 85451

- C

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, hav ing considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant s

. We further order this decision certified below for obse rvance. December 30, 2020
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 4494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2261]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 20 / Thursday, January 30, 1997 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 4494]]



DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

18 CFR Parts 4 and 375

[Docket No. RM-95-16-000]


Regulations for the Relicensing of Hydroelectric Projects

January 23, 1997.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; extension of comment dates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 26, 1996, the Commission issued a Notice Proposed 
Rulemaking (61 FR 64031, December 3, 1996) proposing revisions to its 
regulations for the relicensing of hydropower projects. The dates for 
filing initial comments and reply comments are being extended at the 
request of the U.S. Department of the Interior and the National 
Hydropower Association.

DATES: Initial comments should be filed on or before April 4, 1997; 
reply comments should be filed on or before May 5, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 1st Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lois D. Cashell, Secretary, 202-208-0400.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 13, 1997 and January 14, 1997, 
the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) and the National Hydropower 
Association (NHA) filed respective motions for an extension of time to 
file comments in response to the Commission's Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking issued November 26, 1996, in the above-docketed proceeding. 
In its motion, DOI states that additional time is needed because the 
proposed rule raises significant issues which require considerable 
evaluation and coordination with other agencies for the preparation of 
responsive comments. NHA states that an extension is required to allow 
further consultation with NHA's membership and others to assure 
properly focused and constructive comments. NHA further states that the 
American Public Power Association and the Edison Electric Institute 
join NHA in the motion for additional time.
    Upon consideration, notice is hereby given that an extension of 
time for filing initial comments is granted to and including April 4, 
1997. Reply comments shall be filed on or before May 5, 1997.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2261 Filed 1-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2007-27346

Directorate Identifier: 2008NM205AD

92-25-005, 13--- 1/17/03

92-25-005, 12--- 10/29/02

92-25-005, 11--- 8/29/02

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. Sw.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.2271221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Dale: 03105/2008
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6142

DEANDRE DUNSTON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARY TAYLOR, Charge Nurse with Well Path Health Care; NURSE WALL, 

Charge Nurse with Corizon Health Care; A. BOYD, HSA of Well Path Health Care 

& Corizon Health Care,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:21-cv-00692-HEH-EWH)

Submitted: July 21, 2022 Decided: July 26, 2022

Before MOTZ, HARRIS, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

DeAndre Dunston, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6142 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/26/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

DeAndre Dunston, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order dismissing 

without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to comply with the court’s earlier 

order directing Dunston to submit an in forma pauperis affidavit and a collection of fees 

form within 30 days. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal 

brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Dunston’s informal briefs do not challenge the basis 

for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. 

See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an 

important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved 

in that brief.”).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.*

 We also deny Dunston’s motion 

to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* We observe that a separate ground for affirmance exists: Dunston has pending in 

the same district court another § 1983 lawsuit alleging the same claims against the same 

defendants. Dunston v. Taylor, No. 3:20-cv-00727-HEH-EWH (E.D. Va.). Dunston 

initiated the instant action after noting an appeal from the district court’s dismissal without 

prejudice of that lawsuit. This court ultimately vacated the district court’s dismissal and 

remanded for further proceedings in that lawsuit. Dunston v. Taylor, No. 21-7531, 2022 

WL 605631, at *1 (4th Cir. Mar. 1, 2022) (unpublished).

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6142 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/26/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE00546A3

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
# Ron Sprout, DLA Distribution employee from 1977-2013

/ Published April 25, 2018
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Defense Distribution Susquehanna is celebrating a 100th Anniversary this year. To commemorate the event, DLA interviewed several former employees from the installation, including Ron Sprout, who worked in the rail yard and motor pool before retiring. 

“My name is Ron Sprout. I started at the Depot in April of 1977. I worked there until September of 2013 when I retired with a total of 41 years of service. I had a couple of years in the Marine Corps. I worked at the Post Office for a couple of years and then I saw no future there so I moved to the Depot and I bought a house in New Cumberland because of me moving to the Depot. I moved to New Cumberland on Sunday and I started at the Depot on Monday.

When I first started at the Depot, I started as a laborer. I worked a couple of years as a laborer and in that tenure, I became a messenger for transportation division and I got to know the people in the railroad so I went to the railroad in 1979. I spent my time in the railroad from 1979 to 2002 starting as a brakeman and working myself up to yardmaster.

Back then, the tickets weren’t automated so they had to be picked up at the warehouse and then taken to every warehouse. So I picked up the tickets and delivered them to all the warehouses. We used anything from a car to a three-wheel Cushman. 

I loved the fact that being former military, what I did made a difference to all my brothers and sisters in the military. It was very exciting. Even though it was mid-1970’s, there was a lot of stuff still coming back from Vietnam and we had the air maintenance mission there. So we were getting a lot of the damaged helicopters coming back that we repaired and we refurbished them and then we took them and we shipped them all over the world for reuse and then during my tenure, starting in I think 1991, the Blackhawk Program came into existence and we were responsible for shipping all the Blackhawks from CONUS to OCONUS.It was a major part of the Depot. We had supply. We had air maintenance. And air maintenance did a lot of projects that people don’t know about. We had a lot of helicopters that we have to take care of at night. They come in at night undercover. They would be modified with weapon systems and technical equipment and we’d put them under arms again and then send them right back out. It was a great time to be at the Depot. It downsized because we became a repair parts Depot and DLA had a requirement for us to standardize our rail with commercial rail and it was just not economically feasible to do that. So they phased out in 1991. I left the railroad and I became part of the motor pool. 

I don’t think people in this area that have been in this area for a long time just realize how important that Depot is to our national defense. We just supply a whole lot of stuff to a whole lot of people and we do it very well.”
Guard Soldiers and Airmen gearing up for Hurricane Florence
 
  By Marine Corps Sgt. David Staten
      North Carolina       South Carolina   As of this morning there were about 2,000 South Carolina Army National Guard members on state active duty, as well as about 50 Airmen, and they will remain on duty as long as needed, according to Army Lt. Col. Cindi King, the director of public affairs for the South Carolina National Guard.    Virginia           Maryland             Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Minot Air Force Base website.
#### Homer R. JENKINS d/b/a Jerry’s Marina, Appellant, v. Joseph M. SMITH and Homer Colson, Appellees.

No. 69-155.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 13, 1969.

Robert W. Crawford, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Scott R. Anselmo, of Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and find sufficient competent evidence to support the judgment on appeal. No reversible error having been shown, the judgment is

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and WALDEN and OWEN, JJ., concur.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 168 (Friday, August 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23078]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CO-050-1220-00]

Front Range Resource Advisory Council (Colorado) Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 
(FACA), 5 U.S.C. Appendix, notice is hereby given that the next meeting 
of the Front Range Resource Advisory Council (Colorado) will be held on 
September 18, 1997 in Canon City, Colorado.
    The meeting is scheduled to begin at 9:15 a.m. at the Bureau of 
Land Management's (BLM) Canon City District Office, 3170 East Main 
Street, Canon City, Colorado. The meeting will be a continuation of the 
last meeting and will focus on developing recreation guidelines and 
will include a presentation on the Cochetopa Hills Travel Management 
Plan.
    All Resource Advisory Council meetings are open to the public. 
Interested persons may make oral statements to the Council at 9:30 a.m. 
or written statements may be submitted for the Council's consideration. 
The District Manager may limit the length of oral presentations 
depending on the number of people wishing to speak.

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for Thursday, September 18, 1997 from 
9:15 a.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: For further information, contact Ken Smith, Bureau of Land 
Management (BLM), Canon City District Office, 3170 East Main Street, 
Canon City Colorado 81212; Telephone (719) 269-8500; TDD (719) 269-
8597.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Summary minutes for the Council meeting will 
be maintained in the Canon City District Office and will be available 
for public inspection and reproduction during regular business hours 
within thirty (30) days following the meeting.

Donnie R. Sparks,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-23078 Filed 8-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
```
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 

AIR RESOURCES DIVISION 

CONCORD, NEW HAMPSHIRE 

NOTICE OF PERMIT AND VOC RACT ORDER REVIEW, OPPORTUNITY FOR 

PUBLIC HEARING, AND COMMENT PERIOD 

Pursuant to the New Hampshire Code of Administrative Rules, Env-A 621 .02, and Env-A 

1205.05, notice is hereby given that the Director of the New Hampshire Department of 

Environmental Services, Air Resources Division (Director), has received an application for a state 

permit to operate (draft permit) and VOC RACT Order (draft Order) from, and based on the 

information received to date, intends to issue such permit and Order to: 

Hutchinson Sealing Systems Inc, 

171 Route 85 

Newfields, New Hampshire 

For the Following Device(s): 

Sealing Svstems Manufacturing Operations 

The Order will allow for the installation of a control device and will limit VOC content in adhesive 

materials used in the manufacturing process. The applications, draft permit, and draft Order are on file 

with the Director, New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, Air Resources Division, 29 

Hazen Drive, P.O. Box 95, Concord, NH 03302-0095, (603) 271-1370. Information may be reviewed 

at the office during working hours from 8 a.m. to 4 p .m., Monday through Friday . The draft Order and 

draft Permit can be accessed electronically through the One-Stop Data and Information portal at 

http ://www.des .nh.gov. Additional information may also be obtained by contacting PatriciaNorth at 

the above address and phone number. A request for a public hearing must specify whether the request 

is for the draft permit, draft Order, or both, and be received by the Director no later than Monday, 

March 5, 2012. A hearing request for the draft permit must be filed in accordance with Env-A 

621 .06. Written comments on the draft permit and/or draft Order must be received no later than 

Monday, March 5, 2012 to be considered by the Director in making a final decision. 

Robert R. Scott 

Director 

Air Resources Division
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Decem ber 12, 2017 Session **STATE OF TENNESSEE v.**  **LARRY E. OROZCO Appeal from the**  **Circuit Court for**  **Rutherford County**  **No. F** **- 72737B Paul G. Summers,**  **Senior Judge**

**No. M2017** **- 00327** **- CCA** **- R3**  **- CD** 

NORMA M C GEE O GLE , J. , concurring in part and dissenting in part. I join the majority in affirming the Defendant’s convictions for two counts of attempted second degree murder, two counts of unlawful employment of a firearm during the attempt to commit a dangerous felony, and seven counts of reckless endangerment committed with a deadly weapon . Iwrite separately to dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the trial court did not err by admitting exhibit 13 , the photograph showing the Defendant pointing two handguns at the camera, into evidence. First, the majority concludes that the photograph was relevant because it show s the Defendant “brandishing a similar gun as used in the offense” and “demonstrates the Defendant’s familiarity with and dominion over the guns.” However, Detective Monroe could not say that the guns in the photograph were the same guns used during the crimes , and the Defendant’s familiarity with and dominion over guns was not at issue in the case. Therefore, I do not think the photograph was relevant. The majority also concludes that the photograph was not excludable under Tennessee Rule of Evidence 404(b) because “possession of a handgun is not a ‘bad act’ requiring the application” of the Rule. The photograph in this case, though, shows much more than the Defendant mere ly possessing two handguns. It shows the Defendant standing with his arms outstretched in front of him, holding a gun in each hand, and with his legs slightly apart
. The guns are pointed directly at the camera. The Defendant is wearing a toboggan; a white tank top; a gold chain around his neck; and black pants pulled down to his groin, exposing silver underpants. He has a menacing stance and expression, and the photograph certainly could be a reference to gang affiliation, which the trial court had prohibited. Moreover, I am puzzled as to how the majority could say the photograph i s not prejudicial. In my view, the photograph is disturbing and,- 2
-

therefore, highly prejudicial. In sum, I would have concluded that exhibit 13 was irrelevant under the definition of relevant evidence in Tennessee Rule of Evidence 401. Ialso would have concluded that the photograph fell under the purview of Tennessee Rule of Evidence 404(b) as a prior bad act and was inadmissible under that Rule
. Nevertheless, I have no doubt that the trial court’s error in admitting the photograph was harmless. By my count, f ive eyewitnesses identified the Defendant as the shooter in photograph arrays after the shooting. Those eyewitnesses and additional eyewitnesses testified at trial as to the Defendant ’s being one of the shooters. The evidence against him was overwhelming, and he is not entitled to relief.

_________________________________ NORMA MCGEE OGLE , JUDGE