alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 169 

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 

to identify a route that passes through the States of Texas, New Mexico, 

Oklahoma, and Kansas as a high priority corridor on the National 

Highway System. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2005 

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself, Mr. ROBERTS, and Mr. INHOFE) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency 

Act of 1991 to identify a route that passes through 

the States of Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Kansas 

as a high priority corridor on the National Highway 

System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SOUTHWEST PASSAGE INITIATIVE FOR RE4 GIONAL AND INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION. 

5 Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor6 tation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2032) is amended 

7 by adding at the end the following: 
2

•S 169 IS

1 ‘‘(46) The corridor extending from the point on 

2 the border between the United States and Mexico at 

3 El Paso, Texas, where United States Route 54 be4 gins, along United States Route 54 through the 

5 States of Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Kan6 sas, and ending in Wichita, Kansas, to be known as 

7 the ‘Southwest Passage Initiative for Regional and 

8 Interstate Transportation Corridor’ or ‘SPIRIT Cor9 ridor’.’’.

Æ
Order entered November 20, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01165-CV

SYLVIA ORTIZ, Appellant

V.

COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION, Appellee/Cross-Appellee

AND 

PLANO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee/Cross-Appellant

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-00459-2014

ORDER

Before the Court is Appellee/Cross-Appellant Plano Independent School District’s 

motion for additional time in which to present oral argument. Appellant opposes the motion; 

Appellee/Cross-Appellee Commissioner of Education does not oppose the motion. The motion 

is DENIED.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22789]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Food Safety--Everybody's Business; Public Workshop

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the following 
public workshop: Food Safety--Everybody's Business. The topics to be 
discussed are: An overview of FDA's food safety initiatives; the 
problems of Federal, State, and city agencies in dealing with food 
safety; and why food safety is everybody's business. Education of food 
handlers and consumers about the causes of foodborne illnesses and how 
to prevent them should result in safer foods and less illness among the 
consuming public.
    Date and Time: The public workshop will be held on Thursday, 
September 18, 1997, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Location: The public workshop will be held at St. Josephs's 
University, Professional Conference Center, 5600 City Line Ave., 
Philadelphia, PA 19131.
    Contact Person: Theresa A. Holmes, Philadelphia District Office 
(HFR-MA 145), Food and Drug Administration, 900 U.S. Customhouse, 
Second and Chestnut Sts., Philadelphia, PA 19106, 215-597-4390, ext. 
4202, FAX 215-597-6649.
    Registration: Send registration information (including name, title, 
firm name, address, telephone, and fax number), to the contact person 
by Wednesday, September 10, 1997. There is no registration fee for this 
public workshop. Space is limited, therefore interested parties are 
encouraged to register early.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact Theresa A. Holmes at least 7 days in advance.
Supplementary Information: This public workshop will be held jointly by 
the FDA Philadelphia District Office; United States Department of 
Agriculture (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service; Philadelphia 
Department of Health; St. Joseph's University; Drexel University; and 
Penn State Cooperative Extension Service. Of special interest will be a 
video on the Ten Causes of Foodborne Illness and discussion of a 
``sample menu'': From appetizer to dessert. There will be four breakout 
sessions in the afternoon as follows: (1) Food Allergens--``Hidden 
Ingredients;'' (2) Raw Food: ``Market to Plate;'' (3) Foodborne 
Illness--``More Than a Bellyache;'' and (4) Prepared Foods: ``Too Hot 
to Handle.''

    Dated: August 21, 1997.
William B. Schultz,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 97-22789 Filed 8-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
O rder filed May 16 , 2013

In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

_________ _

No. 11

- 1 2

- 00 353

- C V

__________

IN THE INTEREST OF G.C. AND J.C. , CHILD REN

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Ector County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC2

- 2991

- PC

O R D E R

In this accelerated parental

- termination appeal, each parents’ appellate

attorney has failed to file a brief. This court previously extended Appellants’

briefing deadline and informed Appe llants by letter dated March 28, 2013, that

their briefs were due to be filed on or before April 15, 2013, and that “no further

extensions shall be filed. ” Despite this court’s March 28 letter, neither Appellant

filed a brief , but Appellant (J.C.) filed a motion for extension . This court then

issued an order on May 2, 2013, in which we stated:

Upon consideration of the importance of the rights at issue in this case, we grant in part the motion for extension. Appellants’ briefs2 are now due to be filed in this court on or before May 9, 201 3

. Appellee’s brief will be due for filing on or before May 29, 2013

. The court considers this to be a serious matter in light of the Texas Supreme Court guidelines in cases of this nature. The court will not look upon further requests for extension with favor, and the court will not grant such requests except in cases of extreme necessity. Workload is not a case of extreme necessity. This case will be

submitted on briefs on May 30, 2013

. Subsequen t to this court’s May 2 order expressing that further extensions were not

to be requested, each Appellant has filed in this court a motion for extension of

time in which to file Appellant’s brief. As of today, neither Appellant has filed a

brief.

The par ents’ attorneys, J. ROXANNE BLOUNT and KEVIN D. ACKER

, are ORDERED to appear in person at 9:00 a.m. on Fri day, June 7 , 2013, in

the Commissioner’s Courtroom, Midland County Annex, 2110 North “A”

Street (corner of “A” and Scharbauer Drive) in Midland, Texas, to explain to

this court why they have continually failed to abide by this court’s filing deadlines.

At that time, this court may also enter a scheduling order that is enforceable by

contempt. The filing of a brief will not excuse the ap pearance.

PER CURIAM

May 16 , 2013

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Willson , J.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF THE PRESIDENT

                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    I, Ramon Chimelis, president, treasurer, and secretary, certify that
the forgoing quarterly report on Form 10-QSB containing the financial
statements set forth within fully comply with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o (d)) and that information contained in the quarterly report
presents fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Big Sky Industries II, Inc.


Date: May 20, 2003                   /s/ Ramon Chimelis
                                     -----------------------------
                                     Ramon Chimelis
                                     President
#### Alice Nomey NAMIE v. STATE of Louisiana, DEPARTMENT OF HWYS.

No. 61616.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 24, 1978.

In re: Alice Nomey Namie, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. Parish of Jackson. 353 So.2d 1095.

Writ denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23275]



[[Page 46489]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT97-63-000]


Kentucky West Virginia Gas Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Refund 
Report

August 27, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 22, 1997, Kentucky West Virginia Gas 
Company, L.L.C. (Kentucky West) filed a Report summarizing the refunds 
of GRI overcollections which were credited to the July billing invoice 
of its sole eligible customer.
    Kentucky West states that on May 30, 1997, it received a refund 
from GRI of $58,044 for collections in excess of 105% of Kentucky West 
1996 GRI funding level. Kentucky West states that it credited this 
amount to the account of its sole eligible firm customer.
    Kentucky West states that a copy of its report has been served on 
its customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Section 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before September 3, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23275 Filed 9-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# DLA forward presence enhances commodity, service support during Saber Strike 

/ Published June 19, 2018

U.S. forces in the Baltics and Poland for Saber Strike 2018 have easier access to critical supplies like food, fuel and repair parts with the deployment of Defense Logistics Agency personnel to Powidz, Poland. 

Almost 60 employees and service members representing DLA major subordinate commands like DLA Distribution, DLA Energy and DLA Disposition Services began arriving in the region in May to set the stage for logistics support for the U.S. Army, Europe-led exercise held June 3-15. Now in its 8th year, Saber Strike involves about 18,000 personnel from 19 countries working to strengthen interoperability and trust. 

The exercise marks the first time DLA has dedicated a DLA Support Team to exercise support, said Air Force Lt. Col. John Dingeman, DST deputy commander. This DST is made up of 11 members of the DLA Joint Reserve Force who are overseeing the support of items including food, fuel, construction supplies, repair parts and maps. 

“We’re the command and control coordination cell back to DLA Europe & Africa for accountability of people, items and any emergencies that come down that we need to report back and request further guidance for,” Dingeman said.

The DST is working alongside Army logistics units such as the Mississippi Army National Guard’s 184th Expeditionary Sustainment Command, the Army’s lead in logistics support during the exercise. Air Force Maj. Raymond Lewis is serving as DLA’s liaison officer to the unit. Being embedded with the 184th ESC makes it easier for Army logisticians to get answers regarding DLA-managed supplies, he said. 

“I find that they route the most complex questions through me but also the simplest ones that you probably wouldn’t get over the phone,” Lewis added.

DLA is also using Saber Strike to assess its expeditionary capabilities in the U.S. European Command area of operations by sending DLA Distribution’s deployable distribution capacity to serve as a forward distribution node and theater consolidation shipping point. Called DLA Distribution Powidz Poland, or DDPP, for the duration of Saber Strike, the capability allows DLA to place supplies closer to exercise participants located in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland than if the agency sourced them from DLA Distribution Germersheim in Germany. That means faster support, said Army Brig. Gen. Clint Walker, 184th ESC commander.

“What that has done is allowed the bypassing of a warehouse in Germany, allowing the items that we need to get here faster. And anytime you can get material to the battlefield faster, it enables our commanders to complete their mission.” 

DLA personnel will remain on the ground after the exercise to facilitate property turn-ins to DLA Disposition Services and oversee the disposal of hazardous waste.
No. 00-7049.

#### Williams *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# L_2023166EN.01004801.xml

| 30.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 166/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 166/48

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2023/1323

of 27 June 2023

on the signing, on behalf of the Union, of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 91(1), Article 100(2) and Article 207(4), first subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 218(5) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 May 2018, the Council authorised the Commission to negotiate a free trade agreement with New Zealand. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 May 2018, the Council authorised the Commission to negotiate a free trade agreement with New Zealand.

| (2) | On 30 June 2022, the negotiations for the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand (‘the Agreement’) were successfully concluded. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 30 June 2022, the negotiations for the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand (‘the Agreement’) were successfully concluded.

| (3) | The Agreement should be signed, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Agreement should be signed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The signing, on behalf of the Union, of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and New Zealand (‘the Agreement’) is hereby authorised, subject to the conclusion of the said Agreement. (1)

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement on behalf of the Union.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 27 June 2023.

For the Council

The President

J. ROSWALL

---

(1)  The text of the Agreement will be published together with the decision on its conclusion.

1

---
Exhibit 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Franklin Wireless Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June 30,  2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, OC Kim, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: April 20, 2011




/s/ OC KimPresident and Acting Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23149]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE ADMINISTRATION


Exporters' Textile Advisory Committee; Notice of Open Meeting

    A meeting of the Exporters' Textile Advisory Committee will be held 
on October 7, 1997. The meeting will be from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. in the 
Main Conference Room on the sixth floor at the office of Milliken & 
Company, 1045 6th Avenue, New York, New York.
    The Committee provides advice and guidance to Department officials 
on the identification and surmounting of barriers to the expansion of 
textile exports, and on methods of encouraging textile firms to 
participate in export expansion.
    The Committee functions solely as an advisory body in accordance 
with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.
    The meeting will be open to the public with a limited number of 
seats available. For further information or copies of the minutes, 
contact William Dawson, (202) 482-5155.
    Dated: August 26, 1997.
Troy H. Cribb,
Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements.
[FR Doc.97-23149 Filed 8-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-F
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-10436

Veletta Coleman, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

Miguel Cardona, Secretary, U.S. Department of 

Education, 

Defendant—Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:19-CV-2417

Before King, Costa, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 23, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-10436 Document: 00515989829 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/23/2021
```

[106th Congress Public Law 508]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ508.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 2360]]

Public Law 106-508
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To provide for increased penalties for <<NOTE: Nov. 13, 2000 -  [H.R. 
  5239]>> violations of the Export Administration Act of 1979, and for 
                             other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 20 of the 
Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2419) is amended by 
striking ``August 20, 1994'' and inserting ``August 20, 2001''.

    Approved November 13, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5239:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Sept. 25, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 11, considered and passed Senate, amended.
            Oct. 30, House concurred in Senate amendment.
WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 36 (2000):
            Nov. 13, Presidential statement.

                                  <all>
```
No. 8981.

#### State ex rel. Hoffheimer, Prosecuting Attorney, *v.*The Millcreek Valley Street Railroad Co. et al.

(Decided March 20, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Mr. Harry M. Hoffheimer,*prosecuting attorney; *Mr. Samuel W. Bell; Mr. Charles L. Swain; Mr. John R. Sayler; Mr. Samuel B. Hammel*and *Mr. Wm. Worthington,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Paxton & Warrington*and *Messrs. Kittredge $ Wilby,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### C. W. Robert HARRELL, Appellant, v. FLORIDA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., Appellee.

No. 69-76.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Dec. 3, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# Laskodi presents Red River Expeditionary Team with Humanitarian Effort Awards

/ Published May 8, 2018
TEXARKANA, Texas, 
During a recent site visit to DLA Distribution Red River, Texas on April 18, Distribution commanding general Army Brig. Gen. John S. Laskodi presented Humanitarian Effort Awards to the Red River Expeditionary Team for going above and beyond overall mission support and for their and contributions to the DLA Distribution relief efforts.

During the 2017 hurricane season, the 22 member team spent a month deployed to different parts of the United States providing support to people affected by Hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria. The team, rich with experience in expeditionary deployments, has members who have been with them as little as two months to as long as 11 years. 

In addition to the 22 individuals who deployed, there were many others working behind the scenes to ensure the entire operation was successful. They also received awards.

The Red River team has deployed over 50 times in support of DLA missions.
Exhibit 21

List
of Subsidiaries of Image Sensing Systems, Inc.

|                                                |  |                                                                           
|----------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name of
 Subsidiaries                           |  | Jurisdiction
 of Incorporation or Organization                            
|                                                |  |                                                                           
|Flow Traffic Ltd.                               |  | Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of
 the Peoples Republic of China
|                                                |  |                                                                           
|Image Sensing Systems Europe Limited            |  | United Kingdom                                                            
|                                                |  |                                                                           
|Image Sensing Systems Europe Limited
 SP.Z.O.O. |  | Poland                                                                    
|                                                |  |                                                                           
|ISS Image Sensing Systems Canada Ltd.           |  | British Columbia, Canada                                                  
|                                                |  |                                                                           
|ISS Canada Sales Corp.                          |  | British Columbia, Canada                                                  

51

---
Exhibit 21.1



VillageEDOCS List of Subsidiaries







|   | Name of Subsidiary              | State or Jurisdiction of Incorporation | DBAs               
|-- | ------------------------------- | -------------------------------------- | -------------------
|   |                                 |                                        |                    
|1. | Tailored Business Systems, Inc. | Georgia                                | None.              
|2. | MessageVision, Inc.             | California                             | None.              
|3. | Phoenix Forms, Inc.             | Georgia                                | Resolutions        
|4. | GoSolutions, Inc.               | Florida                                | GoSolo Technologies
|5. | GoSolo Technologies, Inc.       | Florida                                |                    
|6. | GoSolutions Canada, Inc.        | Canada                                 |                    



---