alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# HQC employees celebrate Marine Corps’ 242nd birthday

/ Published Nov. 7, 2017

The men and women who’ve served in the Marine Corps since its birth have built a strong legacy, the service’s assistant deputy commandant for combat development and integration said during a celebration of the Marine Corps’ 242nd birthday at the McNamara Headquarters Complex Nov. 6. 

Marine Corps Maj. Gen. Niel “Rick” Nelson described some of the Marine Corps’ key moments in combat in the past 100 years, from Europe and the Pacific to Afghanistan and Iraq. 

“Iwo Jima was one of the toughest battles in the history of the Marine Corps. There were 27,000 killed and over 25 different Medals of Honor earned. It gave us that iconic image of what the Marine Corps stands for,” he said. 

Present-day Marines have a lot to live up to as warfare of the future changes, Nelson continued. And as the service adapts to working in an electronically contested environment, agencies such as the Defense Logistics Agency must adjust the way it provides support. 

“Our ultimate goal is to prevent conflict,” he said. “To prevent war, we have to be good at war. We’ve got to have the right mechanisms, the right support, the right equipment, the right training, and we’ve got to be in the right place. I think we’re in the right place to do that today. We’ve got the right attitude, and we certainly have a lot of folks out there doing tremendous things.”  

The event also included a performance by U.S. Marine Corps Drum and Bugle Corps and a traditional cake-cutting.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-13-00460-CV

Style: Dorothy R. Schroeder

v. LND Management LLC

Date motion filed*: July 18, 2013

Type of motion: Motion to Stay Trial Court’s Disbursement Order

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: 

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

The trial court’s Order to Disburse Funds is stayed pending further order of this Court.

Judge's signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 for the Court

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: August 2, 2013
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan 

ORDER 

In re A M Kobema-Pauley Minor 

Docket No. 323722 

LC No. 14-819094-NA 

Kathleen Jansen 

Presiding Judge 

David H. Sawyer 

Karen M. Fort Hood 

Judges 

The Court orders that the opinion issued in this case is hereby AMENDED to correct a 

clerical error. The opinion is corrected to read June 16, 2015 as the date of the opinion. 

In all other respects, the opinion remains unchanged. 

A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr., Chief Clerk, on 

.. z 9 2015 

Date
#### Rufus SUTTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-915.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 19, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 26, 1977.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant Rufus Sutton appeals an order revoking probation. The record shows that the probation was revoked for the violation of a condition which was not included in the order placing defendant on probation. Therefore, the order must be reversed and the cause remanded with directions to reinstate defendant’s probation. See *Barber v. State,*344 So.2d 913 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Reversed and remanded with directions.
# L_2023067DE.01006201.xml

| 3.3.2023 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 67/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2023

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 67/62

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2023/429 des Rates vom 25. Februar 2023 zur Durchführung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 269/2014 über restriktive Maßnahmen angesichts von Handlungen, die die territoriale Unversehrtheit, Souveränität und Unabhängigkeit der Ukraine untergraben oder bedrohen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 59 I vom 25. Februar 2023
  )

Seite 287, Anhang, Tabelle „Personen“, Eintrag 1427, Spalte „Name“

Anstatt:

„Vladimir Viktorovich PAVLOV (Владимир Викторович СЕЛИН)“

muss es heißen:

„Vladimir Viktorovich SELIN (Владимир Викторович СЕЛИН)“.

---
SCPW-16-0000655

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

GABI KIM COLLINS, Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE VIRGINIA L. CRANDALL, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT 

COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent Judge,

and

THE ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF KEMOO BY THE LAKE; EKIMOTO

AND MORRIS, LLLC; JOHN DOES 1-100; JANE DOES 1-100; DOE

PARTNERSHIPS 1-100; and DOE ASSOCIATIONS 1-100; Respondents.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CIV. NO. 13-1-2513-09)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Gabi Kim Collins’s

petition for an emergency writ of mandamus, filed on October 5,

2016, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support

thereof, and the record, it appears that petitioner fails to

demonstrate that she has a clear and indisputable right to the

requested relief and that she lacks alternative means to seek

relief. Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to an emergency

writ of mandamus. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204-05,

982 P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an

extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner

demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-16-0000655

21-OCT-2016

01:48 PM
of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or

obtain the requested action); Honolulu Advertiser, Inc. v. Takao,

59 Haw. 237, 241, 580 P.2d 58, 62 (1978) (a writ of mandamus is

not intended to supersede the legal discretionary authority of

the trial courts, cure a mere legal error, or serve as a legal

remedy in lieu of normal appellate procedure). Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of

mandamus is denied. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 21, 2016.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1736 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1736

To provide for the participation of employees in the judicial branch in 
   the Federal leave transfer program for disasters and emergencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 20, 2005

Ms. Collins (for herself, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Voinovich, Mr. Akaka, and 
  Mr. Vitter) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the participation of employees in the judicial branch in 
   the Federal leave transfer program for disasters and emergencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LEAVE TRANSFER PROGRAM IN DISASTERS AND EMERGENCIES.

    Section 6391 of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following:
    ``(f) After consultation with the Administrative Office of the 
United States Courts, the Office of Personnel Management shall provide 
for the participation of employees in the judicial branch in any 
emergency leave transfer program under this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Lesko WALKER v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50405.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 5, 1978.

Parsons & Matthews, Thomas M. Matthews, Jr., Wiggins, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Marvin L. White, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before SMITH, P: J., Lee and COFER, JJ., and WILLIAM R. LAMB, Commissioner.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1668 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1668

         To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 12, 2005

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON A CERTAIN CHEMICAL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following:

``      9902.39.14       Ion Exchange       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         resin powder                                                       31/2008
                         comprised of a
                         copolymer of
                         methacrylic acid
                         cross-linked with
                         divinylbenzene,
                         in the potassium
                         ionic form, dried
                         to less than 10%
                         moisture (CAS No.
                         65405-55-2)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3914.00.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1505 

To amend the Shawnee Tribe Status Act of 2000. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27, 2005 

Mr. COBURN (for himself and Mr. INHOFE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Shawnee Tribe Status Act of 2000. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Shawnee Tribe Status 

5 Act Amendments Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TRIBAL LAND. 

7 Section 707(a) of the Shawnee Tribe Status Act of 

8 2000 (25 U.S.C. 1041e(a)) is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘(1) IN GEN10 ERAL.—’’; and 

11 (2) by striking paragraph (2). 

Æ
#### G. H. CARO, Petitioner, v. PENSACOLA LOAN & SAVINGS BANK, a Corporation, Respondent.

No. L-198.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Aug. 26, 1969.

F. Churchill Mellen, Pensacola, for petitioner.

Robert L. Stone, of Harrell, Caro, Mid-dlebrooks and Wiltshire, Pensacola, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for certiorari dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See DeGroot v. Sheffield, 95 So.2d 912 (Fla.1957).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Donald Gene PRINS v. Ross MAGGIO, Director, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 60494.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 1977.

In re: Donald Gene Prins applying for writs of habeas corpus and mandamus.

Writ denied. No merit in application.
# Troop Support commander engages local business leaders to share DLA mission, impact

/ Published June 20, 2018
PHILADELPHIA, 
Members of the Greater Northeast Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce learned more about the mission and impact of the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support in Philadelphia at a meeting June 18. 

Army Brig. Gen. Mark Simerly, DLA Troop Support commander, highlighted the agency’s community ties. 

“There’s a couple of things I want to tell you upfront,” Simerly said. “We work for you ... [and] we are you.”

“By and large, the majority of our teammates here are from Philadelphia,” Simerly said. He said that was a fact “we take great pride in,” citing the workforce’s passion as a driver of the agency’s mission success. 

“We operate locally ... but we have a global impact,” Simerly said. “Every soldier, every sailor, every airman and every Marine is supported by us wherever they serve in the world.”

Simerly referenced the DLA Strategic Plan to explain how the approximately $8.4 million in business that Troop Support contracted to Philadelphia-area industry partners in fiscal 2017 aided service members, as well as local businesses. 

DLA “represents the taxpayer ... in support of the military” and other government agencies with a primary focus on “Warfighter First,” ensuring the strength and readiness of the armed services, Simerly said. 

The connection resonated with members of the chamber who had family members serving in the military.

“I’m honored to be here today, especially because my son is in the military,” said Denise Ring of Philadelphia Gas Works. 

Simerly thanked Ring and the others who echoed her appreciation.

In response to other questions about doing business with DLA, Simerly pointed the business leaders to DLA’s Industry Engagement Plan, which provides the agency’s focus areas and points of contact related to industry engagement. 

The meeting increased the chamber’s understanding of the DLA mission and appreciation for Troop Support’s impact.

“I never zeroed in on the word ‘warfighter’ before,” Pam Henshall, president of the Greater Northeast Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce, said. “I think it sums up a lot what you do at DLA Troop Support.”
 The chamber of commerce representatives also toured the flag room, Product Test Center Analytical and medals room.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Rickey L. ROBINSON.

No. 61337.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 31, 1978.

John M. Lawrence, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Louise S. Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DIXON and DENNIS, JJ., dissent as to assignments of error No. 3.
#### GRAY LINE SIGHTSEEING TOURS, INC., Appellant, v. AIRPORT TRANSPORTATION SERVICE, INC., Appellee.

No. 76-2210.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 12, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 19, 1977.

*93Richard B. Austin, Miami, for appellant.

R. T. Shankweiler, Patterson, Maloney & Shankweiler, Fort Lauderdale, and John P. Bond, Bond & Woitesek, Miami, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record on appeal and briefs of the respective parties, we determine the trial court erred in dismissing the complaint of appellant-plaintiff, Gray Line Sightseeing Tours, Inc., for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in an action to enjoin appellee-defendant, Airport Transportation Service, Inc., from carrying on the activities of a motor carrier for compensation without proper authorization of Florida Public Service Commission, as the complaint sufficiently alleged and stated a cause of action for relief, as authorized by § 323.24, Florida Statutes (1975).

Accordingly, the order dismissing the complaint is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to the trial court to reinstate the complaint and for further proceedings.

MAGER, C. J., and CROSS and DOW-NEY, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
        10.3

       

      AMENDENT
        TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

      


      This
        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”), dated as of October 1,
        2007, is made between theglobe.com, inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”)
        and Edward A. Cespedes (“Executive”) and amends certain provisions of the
        Employment Agreement dated as of August 1, 2003 by and between the Company
        and
        Executive.

      


      WHEREAS,
        because of the Company’s current lack of cash resources and weak financial
        condition, the Company cannot continue to pay Executive’s minimum guaranteed
        annual bonus and Executive agrees that the Company is terminating its obligation
        to do so. Executive’s Employment Agreement is amended as described
        below.

      


      AMENDENT

      


      Section
        5. (a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended so as to irrevocably
        terminate the Company’s obligation to pay a minimum guaranteed annual bonus (the
“Guaranteed Bonus”) of $50,000 to Executive. Such termination applies to the
        guaranteed bonus otherwise earned for fiscal year 2007 (and otherwise payable
        on
        December 31, 2007) and guaranteed bonuses otherwise earned and payable for
        all
        succeeding fiscal years during the remaining term of the Executive’s Employment
        Agreement.

       

      IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on the date first
        above written.

    

     

    
      	 	theglobe.com, inc.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 /s/
              Robin Segual Lebowitz
	 	 	Robin Segual Lebowitz
Vice President -
              Finance
	 	 	 
	 	Executive
	 	 	 
	 	By:	
              /s/
                Edward A. Cespedes

            
	 	 	
              Edward
                A. Cespedes
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 167 (Thursday, August 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22887]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

Emergency Exemption: Issuance

    On August 15, 1997, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) 
issued a permit (PRT-833446) to Dr. David Owens, Texas A&M University, 
College Station, TX to import blood samples from Kemp's ridley sea 
turtles (Lepidochelys kempii) currently maintained at the Cayman Turtle 
Farm, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands. The 30-day public comment period 
required by section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act was waived. The 
Service determined that an emergency affecting the health and life of 
the sea turtles existed and that no reasonable alternative was 
available to the applicant, for the following reasons: (1) Mexico has 
agreed to accept Kemp's ridley sea turtles from the Cayman Turtle Farm 
which can no longer maintain this endangered species; (2) all of the 
sea turtles must be tested for disease before transport to Mexico; (3) 
testing of up to 200 samples is expected to take at least several 
weeks; (4) because of financial difficulties, the Cayman authorities 
have indicated that the animals must be moved to Mexico by November or 
they will have to be euthanized. The 30-day public comment period has 
therefore been waived to expedite the processing of the blood samples 
to ensure that only healthy turtles are transported to Mexico and to 
ensure that healthy animals are not euthanized in the Cayman facility 
due to lack of supporting funds.

    Dated: August 22, 1997.
Karen Anderson,
Acting Chief, Branch of Permit, Office of Management Authority.
[FR Doc. 97-22887 Filed 8-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
```
Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Jagged Peak, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended June 29, 2007, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 8,
2007



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Paul B. Demirdjian 
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Quock Q. Fong, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Ironstone Group, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this annual report. 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this annual report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisannual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and  c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of theEvaluation Date;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’sauditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and6. The registrant has indicated in this annual report whether or notthere were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses.        Date: March 29, 2006 **        /s/ Quock Q. Fong**             Quock Q. Fong                            Chief Financial Officer
No. 9100.

#### The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. *v.*Hollenberger.

(Decided March 13, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Seneca county.

*Messrs. McCauley & Weller,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Willis Bacon,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Robert James MILLER v. Ross MAGGIO, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 60418.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 8, 1977.

In re: Robert James Miller, applying for remedial writs.

Writ denied. The ruling of the trial judge is correct.