alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1


 


ADDENDUM TWO


TO EQUIPMENT LEASE AGREEMENT


 


This ADDENDUM TWO TO
EQUIPMENT LEASE AGREEMENT (this “Addendum”) is dated effective as of July 31, 2015, between Mercy Hospital Oklahoma
City, Inc., an Oklahoma not for profit corporation, formerly known as Mercy Health Center, Inc. (“Hospital”), and GK
Financing, LLC, a California limited liability company (“GKF”).


 


Recitals:


 


WHEREAS, GKF and Hospital
are parties to a certain Equipment Lease Agreement dated May 28, 2004, as amended by certain Addendum One dated December 23, 2011
(as amended, the “Lease”), and desire to extend the term of the Lease as set forth herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions, and agreements set forth herein, and for the other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


Agreement:


 


1.            Defined
Terms. Unless otherwise defined herein, the capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings set
forth in the Lease.


 


2.            Extension
of Term.


 


		a.	It is acknowledged that the First Procedure Date under the Lease was August 9, 2005, and with the
inclusion of 24 days of down time due to the cobalt Reload, the Lease is currently set to expire on September 2, 2015.



 


		b.	The Term of the Agreement is hereby extended to September 2, 2016, and cannot be further extended
without the written approval of both parties.



 


3.            Full
Force and Effect. Except as amended by this Addendum, all of the terms and provisions of the Lease shall remain in full
force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this Addendum effective as of the date first written above.


 


	GKF:


	 	Hospital:



	 	 	 	 	 
	GK Financing, LLC	 	Mercy Hospital Oklahoma City, Inc., an Oklahoma not for profit corporation (formerly known as Mercy Health Center, Inc.)
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Ernest A. Bates, M.D.	 	By:	/s/ Jim R. Gebhart
	 	Ernest A. Bates, M.D.	 	Name:	Jim R. Gebhart
	 	Policy Committee Member	 	Title:	President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6897

ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SERGEANT O’NEILL; OFFICER OXINDINE; UNKNOWN OFFICER; NORTH 

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, 

District Judge. (1:13-cv-00552-CCE-JEP)

Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger Lee Deal, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Roger Lee Deal, Sr., appeals the district court’s 

order denying his request for an injunction and other relief and 

warning him that any further filings would result in sanctions. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Deal v. O’Neill, No. 1:13-cv-00552-CCE-JEP (M.D.N.C. 

June 4, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
#### Harold Clinton VAN SCYOC, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-749.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 10, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 10, 1978.

Black & Denaro, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Gordon v. State,*104 So.2d 524 (Fla.1958); *Sands v. State,*202 So.2d 141 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967); *State v. Davis,*203 So.2d 160 (Fla.1967); *State v. Jones,*204 So.2d 515 (Fla.1967); *DeRiggi v. State,*209 So.2d 714 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); *Koran v. State,*213 So.2d 735 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); *Powers v. State,*224 So.2d 411 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); *Chariott v. State,*226 So.2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); *Collins v. State,*227 So.2d 538 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); *Arrington v. State,*233 So.2d 634 (Fla.1970); *Wimes v. State,*243 So.2d 443 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); *Wheeler v. State,*311 So.2d 713 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); *Willis v. State,*320 So.2d 823 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); *Barry v. State,*330 So.2d 512 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); *Howell v. State,*337 So.2d 823 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); *Ellison v. State,*349 So.2d 731 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *Wainwright v. Sykes,*433 U.S. 72, 97 S.Ct. 2497, 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.220(j)(l); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.720.
#### Alice GOOD v. John F. COOKE.

No. 50171.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 15, 1978.

John B. Gee, Everette Verhine, Vicksburg, for appellant.

Shell, Buford, Bufkin, Callicutt & Perry, Richard S. Bush, Cary E. Bufkin, Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Adams County; Lenox L. Forman, Judge.

*117Before PATTERSON, C. J., and BROOM and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 2.11(c)

                              TERMINATION AGREEMENT



         THIS AGREEMENT, dated as of April 13, 2000, is by and between UICI, a
Delaware corporation ("Parent"), UICI Acquisition Co., a Delaware corporation
and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent ("Sub"), UICI Capital Trust I, a
Delaware business trust (the "Trust"), and HealthPlan Services Corporation, a
Delaware corporation ("Company").

         WHEREAS, Parent, Sub, the Trust and the Company are parties to an
Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated February 18, 2000, and
as amended as of March 6, 2000 (as so amended, the "Merger Agreement");

         WHEREAS, the Merger Agreement provides for the acquisition of the
Company by Parent pursuant to a merger of Company with and into Sub;

         WHEREAS, the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the
Merger Agreement were subject to satisfaction of several conditions precedent,
including, among other things, the receipt by UICI of the written consent of the
requisite number of lenders (the "Company Lender Consent") under the Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 1, 1998, as amended, between the
Company, the lenders named therein and First Union National Bank, as
administrative agent; and

         WHEREAS, despite the commercially reasonable efforts of UICI and the
Company, UICI has been unable to obtain the Company Lender Consent.

         NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 9.1(a) of the Merger Agreement,
Parent and the Company do hereby mutually agree to terminate the Merger
Agreement and the parties do hereby further agree that, pursuant to Section 9.2
of the Merger Agreement, the merger shall be abandoned and the Merger
<PAGE>
Agreement shall become void, without liability on the part of any party thereto.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Parent, Sub, the Trust and Company do each hereby
acknowledge and agree to the foregoing as of the day and year first above
written.



UICI                                     HEALTHPLAN SERVICES CORPORATION


By: /s/ Gregory T. Mutz                  By: /s/ James K. Murray, Jr.
   --------------------                     ----------------------------

Name: Gregory T. Mutz                    Name:   James K. Murray, Jr.
     -----------------
Title: President                         Title:  Chairman, President, and Chief
     -----------------                           Executive Officer





UICI ACQUISITION CO.


By: /s/ Glenn W. Reed
----------------------
Name: Glenn W. Reed
     -----------------
Title: Vice President
     -----------------


UICI CAPITAL TRUST I


By: /s/ Glenn W. Reed
----------------------
Name:   Glenn W. Reed
Title:  Regular Trustee


By: /s/ Matthew R. Cassell
--------------------------
Name:   Matthew R. Cassell
Title:  Regular Trustee


                                       -2-
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 172 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to provide for the 

regulation of all contact lenses as medical devices, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2005 

Mr. DEWINE (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

provide for the regulation of all contact lenses as medical 

devices, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress finds as follows: 

5 (1) All contact lenses have significant effects on 

6 the eye and pose serious potential health risks if im7 properly manufactured or used without appropriate 

8 involvement of a qualified eye care professional. 
2

•S 172 IS

1 (2) Most contact lenses currently marketed in 

2 the United States, including certain plano and deco3 rative contact lenses, have been approved as medical 

4 devices pursuant to premarket approval applications 

5 or cleared pursuant to premarket notifications by 

6 the Food and Drug Administration (‘‘FDA’’). 

7 (3) FDA has asserted medical device jurisdic8 tion over most corrective and noncorrective contact 

9 lenses as medical devices currently marketed in the 

10 United States, including certain plano and decora11 tive contact lenses, so as to require approval pursu12 ant to premarket approval applications or clearance 

13 pursuant to premarket notifications. 

14 (4) All contact lenses can present risks if used 

15 without the supervision of a qualified eye care pro16 fessional. Eye injuries in children and other con17 sumers have been reported for contact lenses that 

18 are regulated by FDA as medical devices primarily 

19 when used without professional involvement, and 

20 noncorrective contact lenses sold without approval or 

21 clearance as medical devices have caused eye injuries 

22 in children. 
3

•S 172 IS

1 SEC. 2. REGULATION OF CERTAIN ARTICLES AS MEDICAL 

2 DEVICES. 

3 Section 520 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

4 Act (21 U.S.C. 360j) is amended by adding at the end 

5 the following: 

6 ‘‘Regulation of Contact Lens as Devices 

7 ‘‘(n)(1) All contact lenses shall be deemed to be de8 vices under section 201(h). 

9 ‘‘(2) Paragraph 1 shall not be construed as having 

10 any legal effect on any article that is not described in that 

11 paragraph.’’.

Æ
# 3-D printer-capable Marines with 31st MEU print replacement part for F-35B

/ Published April 19, 2018
AT SEA, USS WASP, Pacific Ocean, *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Marines website.*
# AVLOG training event builds readiness

/ Published Aug. 6, 2018
Richmond, Va., 
Nearly 150 professionals gathered in the Frank B. Lotts Conference Center on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia July 31 - Aug. 2 for the third annual Marine Aviation Logistics (AVLOG) Off-Site team building and training event.

Training content at the event focused on improving material availability to ensure readiness for U.S. Marine Corps troops assigned to Defense Logistics Agency Aviation. The Marines are tasked with overseeing four consumable lines of effort: organizational, intermediate, and organic depot support for both aircraft and aviation depot level repairables (AVDLR) component repair and overhaul.

“Relationships help build readiness,” said Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Marine Corps Lead Marine Corps Col. Anthony Manuel. Manuel said AVLOG goals at DLA Aviation are to coordinate with the fleet, individual Program Managers and Fleet Readiness Centers to develop consumable supply chain solutions that produce desirable readiness outcomes, improve material availability and/or supply or order response times while at the same time reducing Not Mission Capable Status, Issue Priority Groups One (IPG1s) and back orders. “What can we do to improve for 2019 to get it to a better state?” he asked.

While the first day of the event focused on the big picture, day two content emphasized expedited roles and focused efforts for the next year, as well as addressing the “low-hanging fruit,” said Manuel. “The final day was reserved for finishing briefings and presenting the out brief. “We go from the tactical, all the way to the strategic,” he explained.

DLA Aviation Deputy Commander Charlie Lilli said DLA material availability is at 88 percent, but, he asked, “What can we do to improve that?” Lilli told event participants that the major focus of ensuring readiness through greater material availability is an issue that is important to the Marine Corps. “In my view, it has changed the way we think about it. It has increased our understanding of [Marines’] problems and has improved the way we work together.”
#### Henry V. CLIFTON et ux., Petitioners, v. CITY OF FORT PIERCE, Florida, etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 48379.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 1, 1976.

Rehearing Denied May 12, 1977.

Richard W. Groner, Moyle, Gentry, Jones, Flanigan & Groner, West Palm Beach, for petitioners.

Edna L. Caruso, Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D’Aiuto & Dean, West Palm Beach, for respondents.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on Petition for Writ of Certiorari, jurisdictional briefs and portions of the record deemed necessary to reflect jurisdiction under Florida Appellate Rule 4.5c(6), and it appearing to the Court that it is without jurisdiction, it is ordered that the Petition for Writ of Certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ENGLAND, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.

ADKINS, J., dissents.

On consideration of the petition for rehearing filed by the attorney for petitioners,

IT IS ORDERED by the Court that said petition be and the same is hereby denied.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.

ENGLAND, J., dissents with opinion.

ENGLAND, Justice,

dissents for the reasons expressed in *City of West Palm Beach v. Gordon,*349 So.2d 160, opinion filed today.
# Police Department takes top award for excellence  

/ Published Dec. 21, 2017
RICHMOND, VA, 
If you work on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, there’s a 100 percent chance, not a work day goes by where you don’t have some sort of interaction with a Defense Logistics Agency police officer, from being greeted in the morning as you come through the gates, to a friendly wave from an officer as they patrol the grounds. 

Chad Tearne, chief of police, Defense Logistics Agency Installation Operations at Richmond, Virginia, said this daily interaction is vital.

“Having a good relationship with the men and women of DSCR definitely helps. We have people here who feel comfortable enough to approach us,” he said. 

In Richmond, DLA employs dozens of officers who provide for the safety and security of the more than 3,000 civilian, military and contractors who work on DSCR. 

The force was recently named the 2017 Defense Logistics Agency Police Department of the Year. They received the award during a ceremony Dec. 12 at DLA Headquarters, Fort Belvoir, Virginia.

Tearne said while he’s humbled by the award, it’s his officers and support staff who deserve all the credit.

“Without each person, the ship would not sail straight,” he said. 

Richard Milligan, chief, Security and Emergency Services, DLA Installation Operations at Richmond nominated the department. In his write up for the award, Milligan stated, “I have had the distinct honor and pleasure of witnessing the excellent teamwork, commitment to mission accomplishment and unsurpassed pride the men and women of our force display every day in their relentless pursuit of excellence in their service to the DLA community.”

Here are a few highlights of the department’s accomplishments:
      -  During the 2017 Agency Management Review, the department received zero critical and significant discrepancies and zero observations out of 106 benchmark items, becoming the first DLA Police Department to achieve this tremendous feat 
      -  Conducted 1,478 responses, compared to 1,398 in 2016 
      -  Maintained an average emergency response time of 100-percent in less than four minutes.  
“These folks have enabled me and the deputy chief to concentrate on taskers such as inspection preparation, modernizing the force, researching and funding the most advanced and up-to-date police equipment,” said Tearne.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 51 (Tuesday, March 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 13844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06088]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Portsmouth

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Portsmouth. The 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires 
that public notice of this meeting be announced in the Federal 
Register.

DATES: Thursday, April 2, 2015, 6:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Ohio State University, Endeavor Center, 1862 Shyville Road, 
Piketon, Ohio 45661.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg Simonton, Alternate Deputy 
Designated Federal Officer, Department of Energy Portsmouth/Paducah 
Project Office, Post Office Box 700, Piketon, Ohio 45661, (740) 897-
3737, Greg.Simonton@lex.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the 
Board is to make recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the 
areas of environmental restoration, waste management and related 
activities.
    Tentative Agenda:
     Call to Order, Introductions, Review of Agenda
     Approval of January Minutes
     Deputy Designated Federal Officer's Comments
     Federal Coordinator's Comments
     Liaison's Comments
     Presentation
     Administrative Issues
     Subcommittee Updates
     Public Comments
     Final Comments from the Board
     Adjourn
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. The EM 
SSAB, Portsmouth, welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory 
committee meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons 
with physical disabilities or special needs. If you require special 
accommodations due to a disability, please contact Greg Simonton at 
least seven days in advance of the meeting at the phone number listed 
above. Written statements may be filed with the Board either before or 
after the meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements 
pertaining to agenda items should contact Greg Simonton at the address 
or telephone number listed above. Requests must be received five days 
prior to the meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include 
the presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal Officer 
is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate 
the orderly conduct of business. Individuals wishing to make public 
comments will be provided a maximum of five minutes to present their 
comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing or calling Greg 
Simonton at the address and phone number listed above. Minutes will 
also be available at the following Web site: http://www.ports-ssab.energy.gov/.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on March 12, 2015.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-06088 Filed 3-16-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
SECOND
AMENDMENT


TO


EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT


BETWEEN


QUEST
SOLUTION, INC.


AND


THOMAS
O. MILLER


 


The
Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 2015, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated September 3,
2015 (collectively, the “Employment Agreement”), by and between Quest Solution, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”), and Thomas O. Miller, an individual (the “Executive”) is hereby amended,
effective as of October 1, 2015 (the “Effective Date”), as set forth herein.


 


Paragraph
1.1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby is amended by deleting Paragraph 1.1 in its entirety and substituting the following
in its place:


 


1.1
Position. Executive shall serve as the Company’s President and Chairman of the Board, with such duties as are customarily
associated with the position of a President for a public company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Executive shall report to and
perform the specific duties and responsibilities assigned to him by the Company’s Board of Directors.


 


Except
as specifically amended herein, all other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and shall continue
in full force and effect.


 


[Signature
Page Follows.]


 




    	 



     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have executed this Second Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the Effective
Date.


 


	 	QUEST
    SOLUTION, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Tom Miller
	 	Name:
    	Tom Miller
	 	Title:
    	Chief Executive
    Officer


 


	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Thomas O. Miller
	 	Name:
    	Thomas
    O. Miller


 


Signature
Page to Second Amendment to Employment Agreement
Exhibit 23



                          CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-09289 and 333-86169) pertaining to the 1995 Long-Term
Incentive and Stock Option Plan of Image Sensing Systems, Inc., of our report
dated February 11, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
of Image Sensing Systems, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for
the year ended December 31, 1999.



/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 28, 2000