44692 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 163 / Friday, August 22, 1997 / Notices

occurring organism normally found in

the environment and on crop plants.

The low toxicity of the subject active

ingredients is demonstrated by the data

summarized above. Based on this

information, it has been determined that

aggregate exposure to Trichodex over a

lifetime will not pose appreciable risks

to human health and there is a

reasonable certainty that no harm will

result from Trichodex residues. Since

people are exposed to T. harzianum

from natural sources, the incremental

exposure from its use in pesticide

products is expected to be negligible.

2. Infants and children. It has been

determined that the toxicity and

exposure data are sufficiently complete

to adequately address the potential for

additional sensitivity of infants and

children to residues of Trichodex. It is

concluded that there is a reasonable

certainty that no harm will result to

infants and children from aggregate

exposure to Trichodex residues.

G. Existing Tolerances

1. Existing tolerances or tolerance

exemptions. A temporary tolerance

exemption in conjunction with an

Experimental Use Permit for Trichodex

is currently in effect. EPA has also

promulgated permanent exemptions

from the requirement for a tolerance for

strains of T. harzianum other than T-39.

2. International tolerances or

tolerance exemptions. No maximum

residue level has been established for

Trichodex by the Codex Alimentarius

Commission. Exemptions from the

requirement of a tolerance have been

granted for Trichodex in all

international registrations.

[FR Doc. 97–22375 Filed 8–21–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–F

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[OPPTS–00215; FRL–5724–5]

Printed Wiring Board Cleaner

Technologies Substitutes Assessment,

Making Holes Conductive; Notice of

Availability

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Availability for

Comment.

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) is announcing the

availability of the draft document

entitled ‘‘Printed Wiring Board Cleaner

Technologies Substitutes Assessment:

Making Holes Conductive.’’ This

document details the findings of EPA’s

Design for the Environment (DfE)

Printed Wiring Board (PWB) Project

regarding alternative technologies for

performing the ‘‘making holes

conductive’’ function during the

manufacture of PWBs.

DATES: Comments are due no later than

October 6, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be

mailed in triplicate to: TSCA Public

Docket, Rm. NEG 99, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, 401

M St., SW., Washington, DC, 20460.

Comments and data may also be

submitted electronically by following

the instructions under Unit II. No CBI

should be submitted through e-mail.

Comments are available for public

inspection and copying in the TSCA

Nonconfidential Information Center,

Rm. NEB 607, 401 M St., SW.,

Washington, DC. Free copies of the

complete 2-volume report (EPA 744–R–

97–002 a and b) can be obtained by

contacting the EPA’s Pollution

Prevention Information Clearinghouse

(PPIC), at 401 M St., SW., (7407),

Washington DC, 20460; 202–260–1023;

fax 202–260–4659, or the report can be

reviewed on the DfE home page at http:/

/www.epa.gov/dfe.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dipti Singh, Design for the Environment

Program, Office of Pollution Prevention

and Toxics (7406), U.S. EPA, 401 M St.,

SW., Washington, DC, 20460; 202–260–

1678, e-mail: oppt.dfe@epamail.epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Project Background

EPA’s Design for the Environment

(DfE) Program began working with the

printed wiring board (PWB) industry in

1994, to identify and evaluate

environmentally beneficial and cost

effective alternatives to PWB

manufacturing technologies. The DfE

PWB Project is a voluntary, cooperative

partnership between EPA, the PWB

industry, public-interest groups, and

other stakeholders. The goal of this

Project is to provide information that

will assist the PWB industry in making

informed decisions when evaluating

and implementing beneficial

alternatives to PWB manufacturing

technologies.

For purposes of this study, the project

evaluated seven alternative technologies

for performing the ‘‘making holes

conductive’’ (MHC) function during the

manufacture of PWBs. The nonconveyorized electroless copper process

was considered the baseline process

against which alternative technologies

and equipment configurations were

compared. With this notice, EPA is

announcing the availability of the draft

document entitled ‘‘Printed Wiring

Board Cleaner Technologies Substitutes

Assessment: Making Holes Conductive.’’

This document marks the culmination

of over 2–years of research by the DfE

PWB Project and the University of

Tennessee Center for Clean Products

and Clean Technologies. The data

gathered on the comparative risk,

performance, cost, and natural resource

requirements of the alternatives and

baseline technologies are presented in

this document.

II. Public Record

The official record for this notice, as

well as the public version, has been

established for this notice under docket

number [OPPTS–00215], and will

include any comments and data

submitted electronically. A public

version of this record, including

printed/paper versions of electronic

comments, which does not include any

information claimed as confidential

business information CBI, is available

for inspection from 12 noon to 4 p.m.,

Monday through Friday, excluding

Federal legal holidays. The official

record is located at the address in

‘‘ADDRESSES’’ at the beginning of this

document.

Electronic comments can be sent

directly to EPA at:

oppt.ncic@epamail.epa.gov

Electronic comments must be

submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the

use of special characters and any form

of encryption. Comments and data will

also be accepted on disks in

WordPerfect in 5.1 file format or ASCII

file format. All comments and data in

electronic form must be identified by

the docket number [OPPTS–00215].

Electronic comments on this proposed

rule may be filed online at many Federal

Depository Libraries.

Dated: August 12, 1997.

Mary Ellen Weber,

Director, Economics, Exposure, and

Technology Division, Office of Pollution

Prevention and Toxics.

[FR Doc. 97–22376 Filed 8–21–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–F

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

[Report No. 2217]

Petitions for Reconsideration and

Clarification of Action in Rulemaking

Proceedings

August 19, 1997.

Petitions for reconsideration have

been filed in the Commission’s

rulemaking proceeding listed in this
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 163 / Friday, August 22, 1997 / Notices 44693

Public Notice and published pursuant to

47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of

this document is available for viewing

and copying in Room 239, 1919 M

Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. or may

be purchased from the Commission’s

copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857–

3800. Oppositions to this petition must

be filed September 8, 1997. See Section

1.4(b)(1) of the Commission’s rules (47

CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition

must be filed within 10 days after the

time for filing oppositions has expired.

Subject: 800 Data Base Access Tariffs

and the 800 Service Management

System Tariff. (CC Docket No. 93–

129).

Provision of 800 Service (CC Docket

No. 86–10).

Number of Petitions Filed: 1.

Subject: Regulatory Treatment of LEC

Provision of Interexchange Services

Originating in the LEC’s Local

Exchange area. (CC Docket No. 96–

14).

Policy and Rules Concerning the

Interstate, Interexchange Market.

(CC Docket No. 96–61).

Number of Petitions Filed: 6.

Federal Communications Commission.

William F. Caton,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–22270 Filed 8–21–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–M

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE

CORPORATION

Sunshine Act Meeting

Pursuant to the provisions of the

‘‘Government in the Sunshine Act’’ (5

U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that

the Federal Deposit Insurance

Corporation’s Board of Directors will

meet in open session at 10 a.m. on

Tuesday, August 26, 1997, to consider

the following matters:

Summary Agenda: No substantive

discussion of the following items is

anticipated. These matters will be

resolved with a single vote unless a

member of the Board of Directors

requests that an item be moved to the

discussion agenda.

Disposition of minutes of previous

Board of Directors’ meetings.

Reports of actions taken pursuant to

authority delegated by the Board of

Directors.

Memorandum and resolution re:

Investment Policy for Liquidation Funds

Managed by the FDIC.

Memorandum and resolution re: Part

369—Prohibition Against Use of

Interstate Branches Primarily for

Deposit Production.

DISCUSSION AGENDA: Memorandum and

resolution re: Part 362—Activities and

Investments of Insured State Banks.

The meeting will be held in the Board

Room on the sixth floor of the FDIC

Building located at 550 17th Street NW.,

Washington, DC.

The FDIC will provide attendees with

auxiliary aids (e.g., sign language

interpretation) required for this meeting.

Those attendees needing such assistance

should call (202) 416–2449 (Voice);

(202) 416–2004 (TTY), to make

necessary arrangements.

Requests for further information

concerning the meeting may be directed

to Ms. Valerie J. Best, Assistant

Executive Secretary of the Corporation,

at (202) 898–3812.

Dated: August 19, 1997.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Valerie J. Best,

Assistant Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–22472 Filed 8–20–97; 10:49 am]

BILLING CODE 6714–01–M

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Freight Forwarder License;

Applicants

Notice is hereby given that the

following applicants have filed with the

Federal Maritime Commission

applications for licenses as ocean freight

forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the

Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. app.

1718 and 46 CFR 510).

Persons knowing of any reason why

any of the following applicants should

not receive a license are requested to

contact the Office of Freight Forwarders,

Federal Maritime Commission,

Washington, D.C. 20573.

EP International Shipping, 8336 Hindry

Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90045,

Elliott C. Penalosa, Sole Proprietor.

Robert W. Cisco Custom House Broker,

416 Common Street, Suite 101, New

Orleans, LA 70130, Robert W. Cisco,

Sole Proprietor.

Dated: August 19, 1997.

Joseph C. Polking,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–22309 Filed 8–21–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730–01–M

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Federal

Maritime Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m.—August 27,

1997.

PLACE: 800 North Capitol Street, N.W.,

Room 905, Washington, D.C.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTER(S) TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Docket No. 96–20—Port Restrictions

and Requirements in the United

States/Japan Trade

2. Panama Port Privatization Issues

3. Docket No. 94–01—Ceres Marine

Terminal, Inc. v. Maryland Port

Administration—Consideration of

the Record.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Joseph C. Polking, Secretary, (202) 523–

5725.

Joseph C. Polking,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–22557 Filed 8–20–97; 2:52 pm]

BILLING CODE 6730–01–M

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Notice of Intent To Cancel Tariffs of

Common Carriers by Water and To

Suspend Licenses of Ocean Freight

Forwarders in the Foreign Commerce

of the United States for Failure To File

Anti-Rebate Certifications

The Federal Maritime Commission’s

regulations at 46 CFR 582.1(a), 582.3(a)

and 582.3(b) require every common

carrier by water and ocean freight

forwarder in the foreign commerce of

the United States to file an anti-rebate

certification by December 31 of each

even-numbered calendar year.

Notice is given that the common

carriers by water shown in part A of the

attached list have not filed the antirebate certification which was due on or

before December 31, 1996.

Consequently, these firms were notified

by certified mail dated and mailed on

August 1, 1997, that, if within 45 days

of the date of such notice, they have not

either filed an anti-rebate certification or

established that it has been filed, their

tariffs would be cancelled in accordance

with 46 CFR 514.1(c)(1)(iii)(C).

Notice is further given that the ocean

freight forwarders shown in part B of

the attached list have not filed the antirebate certification which was due on or

before December 31, 1996.

Consequently, these firms were notified

by certified mail dated and mailed on

August 1, 1997, that, if within 45 days

of the date of such notice, they have not

either filed an anti-rebate certification or

established that it has been filed, their

licenses would be suspended in

accordance with 46 CFR 510.16(a)(6).

This suspension shall remain in effect

until such time as the license is

reinstated by the Commission after an

anti-rebate certification is filed.