alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### DATE Estimate # CUSTOMER ID VALID UNTIL: Quote Prepared For: Contact: Philip Fine Address: 21865 Copley Drive, Dimond Bar, CA 91765 

### Prepared By: KAP Phone: 310-486-4295 Email: pfine@aqmd.gov End User: Quemetco and Exide 

### Lead Time: Description Unit Cost Qty. Total Price Item 1. Xact 640 Multi-Metals Continuous Emission Monitor Rental $22,500 4 $90,000 a. Per month with a two month minimum at each site a b. Instrument rental rate for months beyond 4 months b $16,875 6 $101,250 Item 2 . Probe and Transport a. Fixed Cost (Probe, Heater Controllers, Flow measurement, etc) $19,325 1 $19,325 b. Transport line $469 20 $9,388 Item 3 . Filter Tape a. 15 minute sampling intervals (10 months supply approximately 1 week tape change interval) $780 44 $34,320 Item 4.Site Visit for Instrument Placement NC 1 NC Item 5 . Site Visit for Kickoff Meeting NC 1 NC Item 6 . Installation and Training Site 1 c $26,855 1 $26,855 Item 7.Installation and Training Site 2 c $26,855 1 $26,855 Item 8. Decomissioning Site 1 $11,885 1 $11,885 Item 9.Decomissioning Site 2 $11,885 1 $11,885 Item 10.Shipping $7,000 1 $7,000 Item 11.QAG Testing Site 1 $20,555 1 $20,555 Item 12.QAG Testing Site 2 $20,555 1 $20,555 Item 13 . Full Suite of standards (23 Analytes and interfering elements) $241 36 $8,676 Item 14.Annual Maintenance (Includes tube) $7,412 1 $7,412 Item 15. Annual Maintenance Labor (All maintenance including running standards for XRF recalibration) $7,990 1 $7,990 Item 16. Remote Control Package $9,500 1 $9,500 $413,451 

# Quote

8 Months from receipt of down-payment 

### 2/5/2014 5/6/2014 SCAQMD02052014 SCAQMD



### Total COOPER ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, LLC 10180 S. W. Nimbus Ave. Suite J6 Portland, OR 97223 U.S.A Phone (503) 670

- 9215 Fax (503) 624

- 2120 www.cooperenvironmental.comNC = No Charge Exide, Quemetco or SCAQMD responsible for day to day instrument operation A 1.5% finance charge is automatically applied to the contract balance once it becomes 30 days or more deliquent. a. Rental is for operating time - rent is not charged during set up or during any maintenance events should they occur- Month is defined at 30 da b. Lease to own - ownership achieved in 14 months. Alternatively the difference to $259,000 could be paid in full at any time c. Please see site requirements below PAYMENT TERMS:Net 30 DOWN PAYMENT: Fixed Equipment Costs and first and last months rent at signing $126,209.00 Remaining Payments: Rental and Labor (training, installation billed monthly)



### Infrastructure as necessary including power, compressed air, appropriate sample port, crane and labor to lift instrument into position, and labor for regular instrument operation (e.g. tape changes) Site Requirements
# FY18 Log21 Selectees

/ Published Feb. 28, 2018
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Congratulations to the FY18 Log21 Selectees. 

Nine associates from DLA Land and Maritime will attend the Institute for Defense and Business (IDB) throughout this year. 

The selectees are: 
      -     Joseph Boling    
      - Gabriel Santiago    
      - Jackey Foster    
      - James Davis    
      - Christine Demos    
      - Jamieson Duvall    
      - Felicia Mann    
      - Marizela Marin-Giraud    

Congratulations on your selection!
**-  Beltsville  \ BARC 
-  Animal & Natural Resources 
-  Animal Parasitic Diseases 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">	You are here: 						Research / 								**Research Project:**AVIAN INTESTINAL MICROARRAY ANALYSIS
**Location: Animal Parasitic Diseases**
												Project Number: 1265-32000-086-07Project Type:																				Reimbursable

Start Date: Sep 01, 2006End Date: Jan 14, 2009

**Objective:**To analyze tissue global gene expression in response to mucosal infections by high throughput microarray analysis.
**Approach:**Samples from experimental birds will be processed by ARS scientists who will then perform microarray analyses using in-house developed intestinal cDNA microarray chips.
    Project TeamLillehoj, Hyun  
Project Annual Reports FY 2007 
Related National Programs Animal Health(103)  							Last Modified: 11/05/2008 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
No. 9165.

#### Beiersdorfer *v.*Kessler.

(Decided April 3, 1906.)

Error to Circuit- Court of Mercer county.

*Mr. William E. Ton Velle*and *Mr. Robert B. Land-fair,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. E. A. Miller,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

         I, Jon Jannotta, Chief Financial Officer of Media and
Entertainment.com, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 'SS' 1350, as enacted by
'SS' 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2002 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Media and Entertainment.com, Inc.


Dated: November 14, 2002

                                       /s/ Jon Jannotta
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Jon Jannotta
                                       Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2010 

d0621 

Order 

 

June 28, 2010 

140501 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140501 

 COA: 294407 

Wayne CC: 88-002394; 

DANNY RAY DUNLAP, 88-003080 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 15, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s 

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-014-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22699]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Board of Governors; Sunshine Act Meeting

Times and Dates: 12:30 p.m., Monday, September 8, 1997; 8:30 a.m., 
Tuesday, September 9, 1997.

Place: Boston, Massachusetts, at the Westin Hotel, Copley Place, 10 
Huntington Avenue, in the Essex Ballroom.

Status: September 8 (Closed); September 9 (Open).

Matters to be Considered:

Monday, September 8--12:30 p.m. (Closed)
1. Status Report on the Tray Management System.
2. Five-Year Strategic Plan.
3. Fiscal Year 1998 EVA Plan.
4. Fiscal Year 1997 PCES Recognition Awards.
5. Postal Rate Commission Opinion and Recommended Decision in Docket 
No. MC97-3, Bound Printed Matter, Weight Limitations.
6. Postal Rate Commission Opinion and Recommended Decision in Docket 
No. MC97-4, Bulk Parcel Return Service and Shipper Paid Forwarding.
7. Budget Outlook.
Tuesday, September 9--8:30 a.m. (Open)
1. Minutes of the Previous Meeting, August 4-5, 1997.
2. Remarks of the Postmaster General/Chief Executive Officer.
3. Postal Rate Commission FY 1998 Budget.
4. Fiscal Year 1998 Operating Budget.
5. Preliminary FY 1999 Appropriation Request.
6. Tentative Agenda for the October 6-7, 1997, meeting in Norman, 
Oklahoma.

Contact Person for More Information: Thomas J. Koerber, Secretary of 
the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, S.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.
Thomas J. Koerber,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22699 Filed 8-21-97; 2:55 p.m.]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
#### Mavis Y. NORRIS, Individually, Appellant, v. Monroe STEWART, Appellee.

No. DD-402.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 23, 1977.

Allen C. D. Scott, II, of Maxwell & Scott, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Paul M. Harden, of Smith, Davenport, Peek & Bloom, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Mrs. Norris’ appeal challenges the propriety of the trial court’s order directing a verdict against her and in favor of Monroe Stewart, the holder of a $15,000.00 promissory note signed by her and her now deceased husband. We agree with the trial court that Mrs. Norris failed to establish she was duressed into executing the note.

Stewart had advanced $15,000.00, unsecured and without a written instrument, for Mr. Norris to invest in real property. The uncontradicted testimony shows Mr. Norris converted the monies in order to make payments on his farm where he and his wife resided. Mrs. Norris knew nothing of the business deal nor of her husband’s conversion. When Stewart learned of the misappropriation, he visited the Norris home three times to discuss repayment. Mrs. Norris testified she once overheard Stewart talking to her husband in an upset manner, indicating that should he not get satisfaction, he would take the matter to the state attorney. Eventually, Mr. Norris had his wife type a promissory note and both signed it. Mrs. Norris testified she signed the note because, having overheard the conversation with Stewart and having discussed the matter with her husband, she didn’t want her husband to go to jail. This suit was then brought on the unpaid note.

Summary judgment was granted against the estate of Mr. Norris and that determination is not here on appeal. We are only concerned with Mrs. Norris’ liability as a co-signer of the note. She argues the general law in Florida is that a wife may avoid a conveyance obtained by express or implied threats of imprisonment of her husband, citing *Burton*v. *McMillan,*52 Fla. 469, 42 So. 849 (1907); *Sheldon*v. *Wilfore,*136 Fla. 312, 186 So. 508 (1939); *Loew v. Friedman,*80 So.2d 672 (Fla.1955).

Duress, however, requires a showing the act of the party compelling obedience of another is unlawful or wrongful. *Corporación Peruana de Aeropuertos y*
      *32
      *Aviacion v. Boy,*180 So.2d 503 (Fla.2nd DCA 1965). There was no showing by Mrs. Norris that Stewart’s intimations were illegal. See *Smith v. Commercial Bank of Jasper,*77 Fla. 163, 81 So. 154 (1919); *Commercial Credit Co. v. Davis,*103 Fla. 519, 137 So. 688 (1931); *Tyler v. Hill Bros.,*127 Fla. 419, 173 So. 147 (1937), and *Corporación Peruana, supra.*

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERYIN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Boulevard Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2004 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  November 12, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22740]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Task Force on Assistance to Families in Aviation Disasters Open 
Meeting

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Task Force on Assistance to Families in Aviation Disasters 
will hold a meeting to discuss assistance to families of passengers 
involved in aviation accidents. The meeting is open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, September 18, 1997, from 
9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and on Friday, September 19, 1997, from 8:30 
a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will take place in Room 2230 of Department of 
Transportation (DOT) Headquarters, 400 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven R. Okun, Task Force Executive 
Director, telephone 202-366-4702, or Marc C. Owen, Task Force Staff 
Director, mailing address, 400 7th Street SW., Room 5424, Washington, 
DC 20590, telecopier 202-366-7147, and telephone 202-366-6823.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix), DOT gives notice of a meeting of the Task 
Force on Assistance to Families in Aviation Disasters (Task Force). The 
Task Force was established by the Aviation Disaster Family Assistance 
Act of 1996 to develop recommendations on ways to improve the treatment 
of families of passengers involved in aviation accidents. The meeting 
is open to the public both days. In particular, topics for discussion 
at the September 18 session include a presentation by the National 
Transportation Safety Board on the lessons learned from the Korean Air 
Flight 801 disaster as well as a review of the recommendations to be 
issued by the Task Force in its Final Report to Congress, including a 
discussion of passenger manifest requirements that could be implemented 
to speed family notification. On September 19, the Task Force will hear 
testimony regarding the treatment of families by lawyers and continue 
the review of the recommendations to be issued by the Task Force in its 
Final Report to Congress.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 21, 1997.
Steven R. Okun,
Task Force Executive Director, Department of Transportation.
[FR Doc. 97-22740 Filed 8-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
**Hogs and Pigs--Final Estimates (94904)**
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED





CERTIFICATION



I, Marc J. Zimmermann, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K ofAmericanPhysicians Service Group, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrantsinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





|                     |                        
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|Date: March 13, 2008 | /s/ Marc J. Zimmermann 
|                     | Marc J. Zimmermann     
|                     | Chief Financial Officer
No. 9177.

#### Huber *v.*Carew et al.

(Decided April 3, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Mr. John W. Wolfe;' Mr. Rufus B. Smith*and *Messrs. Outcalt £ Foraker,*for'plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Cohen £ Mack; Mr. Ben B. Dale*and *Mr. E. N. Wild,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
**-  Beltsville  \ BARC 
-  Animal & Natural Resources 
-  Animal Parasitic Diseases 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">	You are here: 						Research / 								**Research Project:**RECOMBINANT VACCINATION STRATEGY USING IN OVO INJECTION
**Location: Animal Parasitic Diseases**
												Project Number: 1265-32000-086-14Project Type:																				Trust

Start Date: Nov 01, 2007End Date: Oct 31, 2012

**Objective:**The objective of this cooperative research project is to develop new strategies to induce cross protective immunity to avian coccidiosis using unique molecular vaccines developed by the Guardian Biotechnologies Company.
**Approach:**ARS developed a vaccination strategy using an in ovo delivery system which which will be used to immunize chickens with immunogenic proteins of parasites.  In this project, ARS will immunize birds using various vaccines which are developed by Guardian Biotechnology, Inc., and evaluate host immune responses.
    Project TeamLillehoj, Hyun  
Related National Programs Animal Health(103)  							Last Modified: 11/05/2008 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
**Red Meat Yearbook (94006)**
Exhibit 32.1 

STATEMENT OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350 

        I,Peter C. Chang, the chief executive officer of Alliance Fiber Optic Products, Inc. (the“Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge, 

        (i)                 the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report"), fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

        (ii)                the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.
**Why it is essential to read the README files?**

When    you choose a data set to view, you will often see a README file at the top of the list.    This is a very important document to read in order to use and find the data you are    seeking. The README document contains at least two pieces of important information for    you:

> **Table contents**
When you choose a data set, you often get a list of numbered tables      or files to choose from.  Often, you cannot tell what file contains your data by      looking at the name of the file.  In order to see what data is contained in these      files, you must read the README file. For example, if you want data on consumption of      pineapples, you need the data set called Food Consumption put out by ERS. But you will not      know that data for pineapples is in Table 25 unless you read the README file.
**How to open data files**
Some of the data files are in a format that requires special software and      instructions to open. We try to give assistance on how to open these files in our HELP      section, but the README file also contains detailed instructions. Make sure to read them      over.

**Data development or interpretation**

Questions concerning the development or interpretation of data sets should be addressed      to the subject-area data specialist identified in the README file.  You      should contact these specialists when you have a content-related question, such as units      of measure, survey methods, missing data, etc.

Back    to FAQs
USDA Economicsand Statistics SystemAlbert R. Mann Library, Cornell UniversityComments and questions to [email protected]