alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regulatory Evaluation 

## tol5----AJM- o2o-AD Docket No. FA/1.- Directorate Identifier: -AD

((yo u make changes to the values in the !able below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. (( they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of/he changed cell. Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e.g

.. aircraft, engine, (e.g., Inspection , propeller, appliance)

replacement) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost Do not includ e on- (include cost (labor + 

## u.s. for U .S. Fleet con dition costs here access, testing , (@$85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products Inspection for



# 0 $0



## 210 GrouR_ 3 airplanes,



# -

\?-ro,.P L.Yf\'.J 

# zv

The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $801.848 Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ On-Condition Costs: 

## G Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cos t Cost per Product (e.g

.. Inspection , (include access. (@$85/hour)

replacement) testing, and closeup)

### We have received no definitive data that wo uld enable us to provide cost estimates for any on-condition actions specified in this proposed ru le.

Spec ial considerations for E conomic Analysis (Use this .field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assum e d or might not be obvious. This .field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

### Exec utiv e Order 12866: Could the AD be consi d ered a " s ig n ificant regulato ry action"? 

# 0 YES* 

# D NO 

### [g) *Explanation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? 

## @ YES* 

# D NO 

### [g) *Exp la natio n: 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the A D have a s ignifica nt econo mi c im pact on a substant ial number of small en titi es? Explai n for either a Yes or No answer. 

# <D YES 

# D NO 

### [g) Explanatio n : 

### Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: T hi s AD could affect intrastate aviat ion in Alaska. I s it appropriate to inc lu de spec ifi c requireme nts fo r aircraft ope rated in Alaska where aviatio n might be th e on ly mode of t ranspo 1 1ation?

# ~ YES* 

## D NO 

### [g) *Explanatio n:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




     We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January
24, 1997 on our audit of the financial statements included in the filing on
Form 10-K, of Walnut Financial Services, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
1996 in their Registration Statements No. 33-99718 and 33-00516 on Form S-8 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (i) on November 16, 1995, and
(ii) on January 19, 1996.



Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP

New York, New York
March 28, 1997
abio-ex102_152.htm


[*] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

 

                                                                                                                                                            Exhibit 10.2

 



 

Change Order Form

 

 

Change Order No.: 4

 

Change Order Submission Date:08 October 2015

 

Sponsor: ARCA biopharma Inc. (“Sponsor”)

 

Study Drug/Protocol No.: BUC-CLIN-303

 

Study Title:   GENETIC-AF (“Study”)

 

EPM#: 5969

 

SPS#: 200267

 

Sponsor Contact:  

[*]

 

DCRI Contacts:

 

Project Leader: 

[*]

 

Business Development:

[*]

 

 

Sponsor and Duke University (“Duke” or “DCRI”) entered in a Clinical Research Agreement (the “Agreement”), effective 05 November 2013, to conduct the above-referenced Project. Change Order No. 1 was executed November 2014, Change Order No. 2 was executed 10 March 2015, and Change Order No. 3 was executed on 27 August 2015. This Change Order No. 4 serves as an amendment to the Agreement and provides details related to scope changes and associated budget adjustments.    

 

Description of Scope Changes:  The budget for this Change Order No. 4 is detailed in Attachment 1:  “DCRI Detailed Fees and Pass-through Cost Estimate,” and an explanation of the change is referenced in the column called “Justification for Revised Scope”.  Unless otherwise noted, the unit costs remain the same.

 

 




 

Description of Budget Change Summary:

 


				
	
Type
	
Contract Value through

Change Order No. 3
	
Change Order

No. 4 Value
	
Revised Total

	
DCRI Direct Fees
	
[*]
	
[*]
	
[*]

	
Pass-through Costs
	
[*]
	
[*]
	
[*]

	
Total
	
[*]
	
[*]
	
[*]




 

See attached timeline and budget files.

The DCRI will invoice completed units on a monthly basis.  All payments remain as agreed upon as in the Agreement unless otherwise stated.

 

 

 

Approval Signature:

 


	
Sponsor:

 

 

By:  /s/ Brian L. Selby

 

Title: V.P. Finance & Chief Accounting Officer

 

Date: November 10, 2015
	
Duke University:

 

 

By:  /s/ David S. Hill

 

Title:  Assistant Director, Finance – DCRI

 

Date: November 5, 2015

 

 

 




 

 

 

 

[*] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended




Attachment 1

 

DCRI Detailed Fees and Pass-through Cost Estimate

 

 

 

[* 5 pages of text omitted]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[*] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
**Stocks of Grains, Oilseeds, and Hay--Final Estimates (94897)**
#### Robert N. CLARK, as the City Clerk of Sunrise, Appellant, v. Dennis J. WALTON, Appellee.

No. 76-1119.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 4, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 23, 1977.

*354H. Mark Purdy of Parkhurst, LaHurd & Purdy, P. A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Frank E. Hamilton, III, of Hamilton, Douglas & Bennett, P. A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

KANEY, FRANK N., Associate Judge.

The Appellant, as City Clerk maintained custody and control of all documents and records of the City of Sunrise, Florida. The names and home addresses of all municipal employees were maintained only in personnel files and this information was also programmed into a computer used for payroll purposes.

Appellee was a union organizer, who desired the names and home addresses of all city employees.

Taking the position that even if these records were “Public records” they were privileged, Appellant offered to supply the names and business mailing addresses of the city’s employees.

Finding this to be unacceptable, Appellee filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in the Circuit Court in and for Broward County seeking to compel the Appellant to provide the names and home addresses.

After a hearing, the court entered a Final Judgment granting Pre-Emptory Writ of Mandamus.

This appeal followed.

We affirm.

In the case of *Warden v. Bennett,*340 So.2d 977 (Fla.2d DCA 1976), the Second District Court of Appeal faced the samé issue we face here, viz, whether a union organizer has the right to obtain the names and home addresses of employees of a public entity, which are contained in the personnel records of that public entity.

In *Warden,*the Second District Court of Appeal said that the public entity was obligated by the Public Records Act to furnish the union organizer with the requested information.

Following the lead of our sister court, we also hold that the public entity is obligated by the Public Records Act to furnish the requested information.

AFFIRMED.

CROSS and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1509 Referred in House (RFH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1509

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2006

                 Referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to add non-human primates to 
             the definition of prohibited wildlife species.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Captive Primate Safety Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. ADDITION OF NON-HUMAN PRIMATES TO THE DEFINITION OF PROHIBITED 
              WILDLIFE SPECIES.

    Section 2(g) of the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 (16 U.S.C. 
3371(g)) is amended by inserting ``or any non-human primate'' before 
the period at the end.

            Passed the Senate July 11, 2006.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### Willie SUTTON, Appellant, v. Brenda Lou KING, a minor, by her next friend and natural mother, Alma Hills, and Alma Hills, individually, Appellees.

No. L-381.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Nov. 13, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 8, 1969.

Truett & Watkins, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Thompson & Wadsworth, Tallahassee, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed from is affirmed. See Hodges v. Helm, 222 So.2d 418 (Fla.1969).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
# DLA Aviation observes National Disability Employment Awareness Month

/ Published Oct. 25, 2017
Richmond, VA, 
Imagine you apply for a job and get a call from your potential employer stating your resume is impeccable and you are an ideal candidate and they would like to bring you in for an interview. 

However, when you arrive for the interview, the moment they see you’re in a wheelchair, they appear uncomfortable and start apologizing, telling you all the ways the job would not work for a disabled person. They even go so far as to tell you the job has already been filled.

This is what Marcus Miller said he experienced time and time again when potential employers found out he was in a wheelchair, the result of a car accident when he was 22-years old. That was 28 years ago. 

“Not everybody welcomes people with disabilities. A lot of employers didn’t want any part of that. They were afraid of that,” said Miller. 

Miller, a demand supply chain analyst in the Business Process Support Directorate at Defense Logistics Agency Aviation, was one of three of the organization’s employees who shared their personal experiences and challenges of being disabled during a disability awareness forum held in the Lott’s Conference Center on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, Oct. 11. 

“Treat us like you would want to be treated,” said Miller.

Qi-Liang Zhu joined Miller on the panel. She’s a customer accounts specialist in the Customer Operations Directorate’s Air Force Customer Facing Division. “I’ve been with many different agencies and I’m going to tell you this place is the best place to work,” she said.

October is National Disability Employment Awareness Month. President Harry Truman began this observance in 1945. 

Ensuring consistent programs of equality, diversity and inclusion for all employees that empower the workforce to achieve their full potential and unify the workforce to achieve the mission falls on the shoulders of the DLA Aviation Office of Equal Employment and Opportunity and Diversity. 

The objective of the EEOD mission is creating a collaborative culture where the empowerment of a diverse workforce bolsters individual and organizational growth. 

Gina Campbell is a contract specialist in Supplier Operations Original Equipment Manufacturer Directorate’s Aviation Engines and Auxiliary Components Division’s Honeywell team. She lost her hearing when she was just nine-months old. “I feel like its one big family here at DLA.”

Miller, Campbell and Zhu are examples of how resilient the DLA workforce is. Resiliency, according to the DLA resiliency webpage, simply means the ability to function really well in the face of adversity. DLA’s resiliency effort is part of six core values of DLA’s Strategic Plan – Integrity, Resiliency, Diversity, Innovation, Accountability and Excellence.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22811]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board


Release of Waybill Data

    The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Hogan 
& Hartson on behalf of Canadian Pacific Railway (WB471-2--7/7/97), for 
permission to use certain data from the Board's Carload Waybill 
Samples. A copy of the request may be obtained from the Office of 
Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics, 
Environmental Analysis, and Administration within 14 calendar days of 
the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are 
codified at 49 CFR 1244.8.

    Contact: James A. Nash, (202) 565-1542.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22811 Filed 8-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
# First-ever DLA Industry Day helps agency promote key SECDEF priorities

/ Published Sept. 25, 2018
**Greenhouse and Nursery Production (91016)**
#### Charles Andrew ODLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-674.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 17, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
**EXHIBIT
      23**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
      33-82172, 333-92611 and 333-91208 of State Bancorp, Inc., on Form S-8 and
      Registration Statement No. 333-40424 of State Bancorp, Inc., on Form S-3 of
      our
      reports dated March 3 ,
      2006,
      relating to the financial statements of State Bancorp, Inc. and to management's
      report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
      appearing in and incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
      of
      State Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005.








Crowe
      Chizek and Company LLC





Livingston,
      New Jersey


March
      13 ,
      2006
Order entered September 1 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00866
- CV
IN RE COLUMBIA MEDICAL CEN TER OF ARLINGTON SUB SIDIARY, L.P. D/B/A

MEDICAL CENTER ARLIN GTON, Relator Original Proceeding from the County Cour t at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 14
- 06294
- C



### O RDER By letter dated July 21, 2015, the relator advised the Court that the parties had reached an agreement regarding the discovery dispute at issue i n this original proceeding. We ORDER the parties to file a joint status report within ten days of the date of this order advising the Court of the status of this matter.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2290]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Emergency Exemption: Issuance

    On January 22, 1997 the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) issued 
a permit (PRT-824324) to SOS Care, Inc., CA, to export one neonate 
margay (Leopardus weidii) born 1/9/97 to Canada and reimport to the 
United States. The 30-day public comment period required by section 
10(c) of the Endangered Species Act was waived. The Service determined 
that an emergency affecting the survival of the margay existed and that 
no reasonable alternative was available to the applicant. This animal 
was at risk because of the need to remove the animal from its mother 
due to weather extremes and lack of care and the need for constant care 
by experienced personnel during the initial 6 weeks of life.

    Dated: January 24, 1997.
Caroline Anderson,
Acting Chief, Branch of Permits, Office of Management Authority.
[FR Doc. 97-2290 Filed 1-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
# Subsistence field rep, who helped introduce DoD school produce program, retires

/ Published Dec. 22, 2016
PHILADELPHIA , 
A Subsistence employee noticed in the early 1990s that poor quality produce was being served in Denver public schools. So he decided to do something about it.

Russ Brooks helped usher in the Department of Defense Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program to provide produce to U.S. schools. Brooks is retiring this month after 35 years of service with the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support.

As a Subsistence field representative in the Northwest Region, Brooks thought the supply chain could deliver better quality produce to schools in Denver. A partnership was eventually born between the U.S. Department of Agriculture and DLA Troop Support in which Subsistence buys and distributes fresh fruits and vegetables to schools. 

Brooks helped start the program in Denver and established DLA support to four of the first eight states that piloted the program in 1996.

“I am very proud and always will remember that the very first shipment of produce with the USDA was delivered from my Denver Defense Subsistence Office to Cheyenne, Wyoming,” Brooks said. 

DLA now provides produce through the program to schools in 48 states, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and Guam. The program has expanded to also support Indian reservations with produce.

“I was, and am, still proud that DLA is the main supplier of fresh produce to the USDA schools and Food Distribution Program on Indian reservations, as well as our most valued military troops,” Brooks said.

Brooks has supported DLA’s primary customers, the warfighter, since 1981. As a field rep in the Northwest, he supports customers in Colorado, Wyoming, Montana and North Dakota.

Brooks describes field reps as being "boots on the ground journalists and trouble shooters in a battlefield.” 

“We are strategically located around the country near our military, schools and tribal customers to provide quick fixes onsite,” said Brooks. “The representatives react to situations relating to all areas of Subsistence.”

In addition to meeting with school and tribal customers, Brooks said he averages over 120 site visits annually to military bases in his region.

“Face-to-face, on-site visits and attendance enables for that effective and efficient link in the chain from the customer to our superiors,” said Brooks. 

John Tolomeo, Subsistence division chief of the Northwest region, said he relies on Brooks to provide feedback on customers’ needs and concerns.

“Russ Brooks is a dynamic person and is all about the mission,” Tolomeo said. “As the eyes and ears of the Northwest region, I find it imperative that he be there. He is like the sheriff over in Colorado.”

Brooks plans to enjoy “the Colorado way of life” during his retirement, including hiking and fishing.
NUMBER 13-11-00027-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

NUESTRA CLINICA DEL VALLE, INC., Appellant,

v.

FUAD ZAYED, M.D., Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 139th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Nuestra Clinica Del Valle, Inc., perfected an appeal from a judgment 

entered by the 139th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number

C-2824-07-C. The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal and request 

that this Court dismiss the appeal. 
2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to 

dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). 

The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In 

accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring 

same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax 

costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties= request, no 

motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

23rd day of August, 2011.
# New Director assumes command of DLA Joint Reserve Force

/ Published Nov. 20, 2016

Navy Rear Adm. Deborah Haven assumed command of the Defense Logistics Agency Joint Reserve Force Oct 1.

Haven is now assigned as the director of the Defense Logistics Agency’s Joint Reserve Force. The JRF ensures DLA’s reserve component is trained and ready to fulfill global operational requirements.

She is a native of Philadelphia and is a graduate of the University of Maryland. She has a Master of Business Administration in Management Science from La Salle University in Philadelphia.Her previous assignments include: chief of staff, Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA); commanding officer, DCMA International; commanding officer, United States Fleet Forces Logistics Support Unit; commodore, 3rd Navy Expeditionary Logistics Regiment; commander, Task Force 48; commander, Naval Forces Central Command Operational Logistics Det.; commanding officer, Navy Cargo Handling Battalion 9; and officer in charge, Navy Cargo Handling Battalion 10 Norfolk Det.In March 2012, Haven was mobilized as the chief of staff, Central Command Joint Theater Support Contracting Command in Qatar. Her previous mobilization assignments include: Operation Unified Response at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and Operation Iraqi Freedom II, Kuwait. She was also called to active duty during Operation Desert Storm. She is a designated joint qualified officer.Her decorations include the Defense Superior Service Medal, Legion of Merit, Defense Meritorious Service Medal, Meritorious Service Medal (two awards), Joint Service Commendation Medal, Navy Commendation Medal (two awards), Joint Service Achievement Medal (two awards), Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal (three awards) and various campaign, unit and service awards.Her civilian experience parallels her Navy career. As deputy director of Maritime Customer Operations, Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime, Columbus, Ohio, she is responsible for supply chain support for military customers worldwide.
Larry Glasco: Customer relationship pioneer
 
  By Christopher Goulait
      DLA’s Logistics Operations
**World Population and Projections to 2050 (95010)**