alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA Pacific moves bulk of Korea staff to expanded site at Camp Humphreys

/ Published Aug. 9, 2018

The Defense Logistics Agency Pacific Command has taken a major step in Korea by officially moving and consolidating its main body of personnel on the peninsula to an expanded Camp Humphreys location. 

The official opening of the facility took place in June and over the last two months, personnel from across the spectrum of DLA began the move south from Seoul and north from Daegu and other locations across the peninsula. 

Thirty-one DLA employees from across six Korea locations consolidated at the new state-of-the-art facility. In all, the new building has 28,000 total net assignable square feet with 16 enclosed offices and open space for 35 cubicles. 

The new facility is home to the DLA Pacific Korea Operations Center, hosting numerous technological advances ensuring continued support to the warfighters throughout the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command area of operations, as well as providing reachback capability to the DLA Pacific and DLA HQ Joint Logistics Operation Centers.

DLA’s goal in moving to the new site was to ensure greater emphasis, coordination, and overall support to the warfighter. “The consolidated moved into Camp Humphreys creates extreme synergy across the MSCs and DLA J/D codes,” said Army Col. Brent Coryel, deputy commander of DLA Pacific. “The colocated nature of the facility creates greater synchronicity among the DLA team, not only in the Korea peninsula, but across the Pacific AOR.

“We are one DLA and our goal is to support the warfighter,” he added. “This moves created a stronger unity with the partnering military organizations that are also housed in the new facility to include logistics partners from the 403rd Army Field Support Brigade, 411th Contracting Support Brigade, AAFES and DECA. This has been a long time in the waiting and is a great day for the DLA Pacific Korea team.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF INCOME AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND IS
     QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          13,914
<SECURITIES>                                    19,493
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,869
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     14,276
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,471
<PP&E>                                          54,651
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,516
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 112,141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,372
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           130
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,743
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   112,141
<SALES>                                        153,260
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               153,260
<CGS>                                          116,629
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  147,597
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,559
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,343
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,216
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,216
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40<F1>
<FN>
Prepared in Accordance  with FAS 128. Basic and Diluted EPS have been entered in
place of Primary and Diluted EPS.
</FN>        


</TABLE>
#### Marie Smith GIBSON, Appellant, v. Edward SMITH, Appellee.

No. DD-426.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 10, 1977.

John M. Davis, Milton, for appellant.

No Appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s order stating “The ar-rearage in the amount of $1,680 is forgiven” is in error. The court is without authority to forgive or dissolve an indebtedness for alimony unpaid under the court’s prior and unmodified order, although “by virtue of the general power of a court to control its own processes the court may, for strong equitable reasons, growing out of radically changed circumstances, refuse to enforce its decree by issuance of execution or by contempt . . ..” *Pottinger v. Pottinger,*133 Fla. 442, 446, 182 So. 762, 763 (1938). See also *Van Loon v. Van Loon,*132 Fla. 535, 182 So. 205 (1938); *Patterson v. Patterson,*348 So.2d 592 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Although the order before us is without findings of circumstances which would justify denial of judgment and execution, the record is also unclear concerning an application for such relief. The order is therefore VACATED and the case REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this decision.

McCORD, C. J., and RAWLS and SMITH, JJ., concur.
No. 8855.

#### In the Matter of the Estate of Walter G. Higgins, Deceased: Holmes, Jr. *v.*Higgins et al.

(Decided March 20, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Franklin county.

*Mr. James T. Holmes, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Thomas E. Powell,*for defendants in error.

*453Judgment of circuit court reversed and that of common pleas affirmed. Ground stated in journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said circuit court be and the same hereby is reversed for the reason that the record before the circuit court did not show that the probate court had not denied administration to the defendants in error for cause. And this court proceeding to render the judgment which said circuit court should have rendered, it is considered and adjudged that the judgment of the court of common pleas be and it hereby is affirmed.

Shatjck, C. J., Price, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 10.20
 CEO
INCENTIVE PROGRAM  FISCAL 2010
 Participants:
    
    All Chief Executive Officers (CEOs).Target Incentive:
    
    Incentive is equal to 125% of base salary at 100% achievement of performance
criteria. A maximum incentive of 200% of base salary can be achieved.Performance Criteria:
    
    Appendix A details the schedule of incentive
attainment and plan goals based on actual
performance versus plan performance. The plan
performance is based on the financial plan approved
by the Board of Directors at the July 2009 Board
Meeting.Payment:
    
    Incentive payment for fiscal year 2010 will be made
in July 2010 following approval by the Board of
Directors. The CEO must be active in their role and
a Paychex employee at the end of the applicable
fiscal year to be eligible for the annual bonus,
except as noted under the Partial Year section
below.Partial Year:
    
    CEOs appointed during the fiscal year will be
eligible for a bonus award based on a partial year
formula calculation. The calculated amount is
subject to adjustment by the Plan Administrators and
must be reviewed with the Board of Directors to
determine if the payment is fair.CEOs who terminate employment with Paychex, or whose employment is terminated
by Paychex (except for death or long term disability) at any time during the
plan year will not be entitled to a bonus.A CEO (or their beneficiaries or legal representatives) who dies or is on
long-term disability is eligible for a bonus award based on a partial year
formula calculation. The calculated amount is subject to adjustment by the
Plan Administrators and must be reviewed by the Board of Directors to
determine if the payment is fair.Plan Administration:
    
    The incentive plan will be
administered and interpreted by the Governance and Compensation
Committee, as approved by the Board of Directors. There are no deviations from plan criteria
unless specifically agreed to in writing by the Board of Directors, as recommended by the Plan
Administrator. The plan may be amended, suspended or terminated at any time.This does not constitute a contract of or for employment of any specific
duration. Paychex abides by the principle of employment-at-will, which permits
the company or the employee to terminate the employment relationship with or
without notice, with or without cause, at any time.
#### CONGRESS AVENUE BAPTIST CHURCH, Appellant, v. STATE BEVERAGE DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA, etc., and Forest Hill Liquor, Inc., etc., Appellees.

No. 69-694.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Dec. 5, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Robert S. Hewitt, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Mr. Shawn M. Garvin 

Regional Administrator (3RAOO) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region Ill 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia PA 19103-2029 

Dear Mr. Garvin: 

JUL. 2 8 C!Jf4 

The purpose of this letter is to submit the enclosed State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

Revision # 14-01 containing Maryland's updated Clean Car regulations that reflect the changes made 

to adopt the California Low Emissions Vehicle Ill Program. The last update to the Maryland 

regulations occurred in March 2013. This SIP Revision includes amendments to Regulation .02 under 

COMAR 26.11.34 Low Emissions Vehicle Program. Though this package contains all of the 

appropriate California regulations, Maryland is not submitting §2030 Liquefied Petroleum Gas or 

Natural Gas Retrofit Systems from Division 3, Chapter 1, Article 5 of Title 13 of the California Code of 

Regulations, for approval as part of Maryland's SIP. 

The Notice of Proposed Action was published in the Maryland Register on November 15, 2013. A 

public hearing was held on December 18,2013. The action was adopted on January 28, 2014. The 

Notice of Final Action was published on February 21, 2014 and the action became effective on March 

3, 2014. All required administrative procedures were followed throughout the adoption process. 

I certify that the electronic copy of this SIP submittal (compact disk enclosed) is an exact duplicate of 

the official hard copy. If you have any questions concerning this SIP action, please feel free to call me 

at (410) 537-3084 or Mr. George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr., Director of the Air and Radiation Management 

Administration, at { 41 0) 537-3255. 

Sincerely, 

1£rt , Ph.D. 

Secretary 

enclosure 

Rccydctl l':lj'Cr www. mde.state.md.us lTY User.. XI 22 ~11 Via Maryland )(cJ y f'i'-~
No. 00-7152.

#### Bemore *v.*California.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certio-rari denied.
# Council Rock 15 inspires Troop Support commander

/ Published June 1, 2017
Newtown, Pennsylvania, 

In honor of the Council Rock 15 and all fallen United States service members, the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support commander participated in a Memorial Day ceremony at Council Rock North High School May 26 in Newtown, Pennsylvania.

Army Brig. Gen. Charles Hamilton joined American Legion Morell Smith Post #440 in commemorating the high school’s 15 graduates who did not return home from America’s armed conflicts: 12 were killed in action and one is missing in action in Vietnam; one was killed in action in Iraq; and one was killed in action in Afghanistan. Some of the Post #440 members had known the Vietnam soldiers as high school friends and classmates.

“I can tell you right now that I’m truly inspired,” Hamilton told the audience of junior and senior high school students. He referred to photos of the 15 graduates arranged on stage when he said, “I’m truly inspired to even serve longer, and even work harder, based on their service to our country.”

The general and audience stood and applauded for the family members of the Council Rock 15 in attendance at the ceremony.

“It’s through events like this today that we keep the great memories alive in our hearts and show these great young men they’ll never be forgotten,” said Hamilton.

Several groups of students took part in the ceremony, including members of the student executive board, the color guard, the NorthVoice choral group and the school’s buglers. As the buglers played taps, another group of students laid a rose at the base of each picture of the Council Rock 15 on stage.

Principal Susan McCarthy urged students to reflect on the true meaning of the day despite the festivities of the Memorial Day holiday.

“Be mindful of the sacrifices of others before we enjoy the freedoms these sacrifices have enabled us to experience,” McCarthy said. Citing the Council Rock 15 and fallen service members nationwide, she continued, “It is their ultimate sacrifice that has served to keep America free and secure.”
NO. 03

- 16

- 00038

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AUSTIN, TEXAS

CITY OF AUSTIN,

Apellant,

v.

TRAVIS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT; INDIVIDUALS WHO OWN C1

(VACANT LAND) OR F1 (COMMERCIAL REAL) PROPERTY WITHIN

TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS and THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellees.

ON APPEAL FROM THE 126 TH DISTRICT COURT

TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

CAUSE NO. D -1- GN

- 15

- 003492

APPELLEES TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS , LOWE’S HOME

CENTERS, LLC, AND H E DRISKILL, LLC’S NOTICE OF INTENT TO

APPEAR FOR ORA L ARGUMENT

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Daniel R. Smith intends to argue the case on

behalf of A ppelle e s Texas Association of Realtors, Lowe’s Home Cent ers, LLC,

and H E Driskill, LLC at the hearing scheduled for September 28, 2016 at 1:30

PM. ACCEPTED

03-16-00038-CV

12068203

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

8/9/2016 12:23:06 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK2 Respectfully Submitted,

POPP HUTCHESON PLLC

1301 S. Mopac, Suite 430

Austin, Texas 78746

(512) 473

- 2661

- Telephone

(512) 479

- 8013

– Facsimile

JAMES E. POPP

State Bar No. 16139280

Jim.Popp@property

- tax.com

MARK S. HUTCHESON

State Bar No. 00796805

Mark.Hutcheson@property

- tax.com

DANIEL R. SMITH

State Bar No. 24013525

Daniel.Smith@property

- tax.com

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES

TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS,

LOWE’S HOME CENTERS, LLC, AND

H E DRISKILL, LLC3 C ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of foregoing instrument has been

served, on this the 9th day of August , 2016 to the following:

Via E

- Service

Andralee Cain Lloyd

Michael Siegel

City of Austin

– Law Department

andralee.lloyd@austintxas.gov

michael.siegel@austintexas.gov

Attorneys for Appellant The City of

Austin Cynthia A. Morales

Attorney General’s Office

Financial Litigation and Charitable Trusts

Division

cynthia.morales@texasattorneygeneral.gov

Attorney for Appellee State of Texas

G. Todd Stewart

Tammy White

- Chaffer

Deborah S. Cartwright

OLSON & OLSON, LLP

tstewart@olsonllp.com

tchaffer@olsonllp.com

dcartwright@olsonllp.com

Attorneys for Appellee Travis County

Appraisal District Lorri Michel

Raymo nd Gray

Shane Rogers

MICHEL GRAY LLP

lorri@michelgray.com

raymond@michelgray.com

shane@michelgray.com

Attorneys for Homeowners Intervenors

and Defendant Junkyard Dogs

Bill Aleshire

Aleshire Law, PC

bill@aleshirelaw.com

Attorneys for Appellee/Cross

Appellant Junk Yard Dogs Thomas Michel

Griffith, Jay & Michel, LLP

thomasm@lawgjm.com

DANIEL R. SMITH
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               9
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,699
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          17,753
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     14,141
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             202
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               212
<LOANS>                                        342,276
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 389,003
<DEPOSITS>                                     294,250
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,167
<LONG-TERM>                                     37,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,669
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,917
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 389,003
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 27,179
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,140
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,123
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                29,442
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              13,225
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,048
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           14,394
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      103
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,245
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,310
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,310
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.85
<LOANS-NON>                                        928
<LOANS-PAST>                                       629
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,930
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       19
<RECOVERIES>                                         3
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,017
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,017
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
# Troop Support employees learn about Distribution’s support to Medical’s mission

/ Published Nov. 21, 2018
PHILADELPHIA, 
Employees from the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support’s Medical supply chain toured a DLA Distribution facility in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania for a behind-the-scenes look of their daily support Nov. 14.

Medical’s Culture Improvement Team sponsored the day of training for 17 employees to learn how DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania works with Medical supporting service members and its other customers. 

“This CIT-sponsored event was important in order to help our Medical employees see how their hard work here at Troop Support lends itself to supporting the warfighter, whole of government and foreign military sales customers with [medical] supplies,” said Yvonne Poplawski, Medical CIT co-lead and Collective and Foreign Military Sales division chief.

The tour taught the employees about the warehouse’s cold chain arena, controlled substance cage, medical kitting, medical mission stock and foreign military sales’ air pallet consolidation. They also discussed labeling and marking concerns with the DDSP team.

Sooyun Kim, a Customer Pharmacy Operations Center pharmacist and co-lead for the tour, said even though she was familiar with the DDSP’s support towards Medical’s mission, the behind-the-scenes aspect was “all very new.”

“Having the opportunity to step inside [the space] where mission critical items are stored and assembled left us fascinated,” Kim said. “We were also impressed with the dedication and detail provided by the DDSP team, as well as the tight security management and the magnitude of the operation.”

The tour had a positive effect on Kim.

“Being able to see the actual products that are being distributed out to our troops gave me a lasting impression as a Medical employee,” Kim said. 

According to Poplawski, the visit was the first of its kind at the medical warehouse for the Medical CIT.

The Medical CIT sponsors programs throughout the year focusing on communication, training, succession planning and new employee onboarding.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 11, 2014. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 11, 2014 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15D0167. ELLEN M. STONE v. S & H MOTORS, INC., d/b/a KIA OF AUGUSTA .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2014RCSC00373
#### Randall Rex BARNES, Cindy Breaux, Brenda Howard, Joe B. Fincher v. SUN OIL COMPANY et al.

No. 61773.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 31, 1978.

In re: Randall Rex Barnes and Joe B. Fincher, Cindy Breaux and Brenda Howard, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St. Mary. 358 So.2d 655.

Writ granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DOUGLAS PRESTON SMITH,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 730 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of April, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
# DLA hosts two-day event aimed at continuous process improvements

/ Published Dec. 28, 2018
RICHMOND, VA,