Page 1 of 29



# A Ballast Discharge

Monitoring System for

Great Lakes Relevant Ships:

A Guidebook for Researchers, Ship Owners,

and Agency Officials

N OVEMBER 

## 18, 2011

P REPARED 

### B Y 

### :

Allegra Cangelosi, Northeast

‐ Midwest Institute

Tyler Schwerdt, AMI Consulting Engineers

Travis Mangan, Northeast

‐ Midwest Institute

Nicole Mays, Northeast

‐ Midwest Institute

Kelsey Prihoda, Lake Superior Research InstitutePage 2 of 29



## ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The GSI team wishes to thank the Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources, the United

States Department of Transportation Maritime Administration and the Great Lakes Protection

Fund for financial support for the work leading to the development of this Guidebook. We are

indebted to the technical teams at the Navy Research Laboratory and Work Groups of the

International Maritime Organization Maritime Environment Protection Committee for initial

guidelines for effective sampling from ships. Most of all, the GSI project benefited from the

participation and assistance of the ship owners and their capable Officers and Crew Members

involved in the GSI effort to develop and test these methods. Specifically, we thank the owners,

operators, officers and crew of the Niagara, Saguenay, M/V Tim S. Dool, M/V Indiana Harbor,

Edwin H. Gott, Str. Herbert C. Jackson, M/V James R. Barker, M/V Hon. James L. Oberstar,

Federal Hunter and Isolda.

GSI Team Members:

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:

Allegra	Cangelosi,	NEMWI

RESEARCH TEAM:

Lisa	Allinger,	NRRI,	UMD

Mary	Balcer,	PhD,	LSRI,	UWS

Lana	Fanberg,	LSRI,	UWS

Debra	Fobbe,	LSRI,	UWS

Steve	Hagedorn,	LSRI,	UWS

Travis	Mangan,	NEMWI

Nicole	Mays,	NEMWI

Christine	Polkinghorne,	LSRI,	UWS

Kelsey	Prihoda,	LSRI,	UWS

Euan	Reavie,	PhD,	NRRI,	UMD

Deanna	Regan,	LSRI,	UWS

Donald	Reid,	Consultant

Elaine	Ruzycki,	NRRI,	UMD

Heidi	Saillard,	LSRI,	UWS

Heidi	Schaefer,	LSRI,	UWS

Tyler	Schwerdt,	AMI	Engineering

Tyler	Snetting,	AMI	Engineering

Matthew	TenEyck,	LSRI,	UWSPage 3 of 29



## CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

............................................................................................................................... .................. 2

Chapter 1: Introduction

............................................................................................................................... ................. 4

Guidebook Purpose

............................................................................................................................... .................... 4

Background on the Great Ships Initiative (GSI)

......................................................................................................... 4

Background on GSI Ship Discharge Monitoring Project

............................................................................................ 5

Sampling Approach Overview

............................................................................................................................... .... 6

Chapter 2: Sample Port/Return Ports

......................................................................................................................... 8

Step by Step Approach to Pitot Diameter Selection

................................................................................................. 9

Criteria for Sample Port Location

.............................................................................................................................. 9

Sample Pitot Locations in Ballast Systems Found on Great Lakes

‐ Relevant Ships Types........................................ 10

Power Requirements

............................................................................................................................... ................ 13

Pitot Custody

............................................................................................................................... ............................ 13

Step

‐ By

‐ Step Process for Sample Port Commissioning

........................................................................................... 13

Chapter 3: Equipment, Set Up and Tear

‐ Down

.......................................................................................................... 14

Sampling System Components

............................................................................................................................... . 14

Human Machine Interface (HMI) Software

............................................................................................................. 20

Sample Gear

............................................................................................................................... ............................. 21

Personal Protective Gear and Dress

........................................................................................................................ 24

Equipment Set up and Tear

‐ Down

.......................................................................................................................... 25

Chapter 4: Outcomes and Recommendations

.......................................................................................................... 26

Costs

............................................................................................................................... ......................................... 26

Equipment Performance

............................................................................................................................... .......... 26

Recommendations

............................................................................................................................... ................... 27

Conclusions

............................................................................................................................... .............................. 28

References

............................................................................................................................... .................................... 28

Appendix 1

‐ MV Indiana Harbor Sample Location Inspection Report

...................................................................... 29Page 4 of 29



## C HAPTER 

## 1: I NTRODUCTION



### G UIDEBOOK 

### P URPOSE

The purpose of this Guidebook is to share with regulatory authorities, ship owners and

researchers basic guidelines developed by the Great Ships Initiative (GSI) for collecting and

analyzing representative samples of living organisms in ballast discharge from Great Lakes

‐

relevant ships. Specifically, this Guidebook details methods for retrieving quantitative samples

from ships to determine live organism densities in three size classes of organisms (equal to or

greater than 50 micrometers in minimum dimension, less than 50 micrometers and equal to or

greater than 10 micrometers in minimum dimension, and less than 10 micrometers in minimum

dimension), water quality parameters, and whole effluent toxicity tests. Methods associated

with sample analysis are not currently part of this Guidebook, but GSI Standard Operating

Procedures for analysis are the same as for land

‐ based tests of ballast water treatment systems

(BWTSs), and can be downloaded from GSI’s website ( www.greatshipsinitiative.org ). It is

important to note that the methods described here are preliminary and subject to revision over

time. GSI will periodically update this Guidebook and repost new versions on its website over

time.

GSI designed these ship discharge monitoring methods for planned ship discharge monitoring

exercises (these methods would not be suitable to surprise spot checks). As such, the methods

in this Guidebook are highly applicable to a wide range of quantitative ballast treatment

performance research and validation, including type approval testing and planned treatment

performance monitoring events post approval. Any application of these methods to regulatory

purposes, however, would require close review and revisions of method specifics per specific

regulatory guidelines.

Chapter 1 presents an overview of the GSI ship discharge sampling approach. Chapter 2

describes details of the sample and return port installations necessary for this sampling

approach to be used on Great Lakes

‐ relevant ships. Chapter 3 details the set

‐ up and break

‐

down processes for implementing this approach for a sampling event. Chapter 4 provides a

discussion of the feasibility of the methods, including their strengths and weaknesses based on

GSI trials in the field.



### B ACKGROUND	ON	THE 

### G REAT 

### S HIPS 

### I NITIATIVE 

### (GSI)

GSI is a collaborative project led by the Northeast

‐ Midwest Institute (NEMWI) devoted to

ending the problem of ship

‐ mediated invasive species in the Great Lakes

‐ St. Lawrence Seaway

System and globally. NEMWI is a Washington, D.C

‐ based non

‐ profit and non

‐ partisan research

organization dedicated to the economic vitality, environmental quality, and regional equity of

Northeast and Midwest states. In support of that goal, NEMWI has established through GSI a

superlative freshwater ballast treatment evaluation capabilities at three scales—bench, land

‐

based, and on board ship. GSI research is carried out collaboratively with contracting entitiesPage 5 of 29

including the University of Wisconsin

‐ Superior (UW

‐ S), AMI Consulting Engineers, Broadreach

Services, and the University of Minnesota

‐ Duluth (UM

‐ D).

GSI testing takes place at the scale appropriate to the treatment’s state of development. The

goal is to help meritorious BWTSs progress as rapidly as possible to an approval

‐ ready and

market

‐ ready condition through supplying rigorous status testing or certification testing of

biological efficacy. To assure relevancy of test output, GSI test protocols, generally, are as

consistent with the International Maritime Organization (IMO) Convention for the Control and

Management of Ships' Ballast Water and Sediments Convention (IMO, 2004) and federal and

state requirements as practicable. For example, United States Environmental Protection Agency

(USEPA), Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) Program testing is performed consistent

with ETV protocols (e.g., NSF International, 2010).

A GSI Advisory Committee comprises top

‐ level officials of key stakeholder groups and provides

direct input on GSI award decisions, program direction, finances and fund

‐ raising. The GSI

Advisory Committee, which meets three times a year, includes elected leadership,

environmental organizations, port directors and federal officials from the United States and

Canada, and industry representatives.

GSI’s Quality Management Plan (GSI, 2011) outlines the activities that GSI uses to ensure that

personnel have the necessary education, qualifications, and experience needed to effectively

carry out their specific roles and responsibilities within the project.



### B ACKGROUND	ON 

### GSI S HIP 

### D ISCHARGE 

### M ONITORING 

### P ROJECT

GSI received funding from the Legislative Citizen’s Commission on Minnesota Resources

(LCCMR), the Maritime Administration and the Great Lakes Protection Fund to design, install

and test a ship

‐ based ballast discharge sampling approach on the range of commercial cargo

ships which ply the Great Lakes. The primary goal of this GSI project was to inform ship owners,

researchers and regulators of effective and efficient methods for carrying out ballast discharge

monitoring on Great Lakes ships. A secondary goal was to initiate the installation of effective

sampling ports on Great Lakes

‐ relevant ships for BWTS testing and monitoring.

GSI developed a proposed sampling approach, which included permanent sample port flange

installation guidelines consistent with those of the IMO (IMO, 2004) and the USEPA ETV

Program (NSF International, 2010); portable sampling system equipment and methods for

shipboard use; and portable sample analysis equipment and methods for port

‐ side use.

GSI personnel visited a range of ships to identify best locations for sample port flanges given a

set of the project criteria (see Chapter 2). Sample locations that had potential to meet most or

all of these criteria were identified and photographed during the ship visit, and later modeled

using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to determine which location would deliver the most

representative sample.Page 6 of 29

GSI in consultation with the ship owner then selected the best location based on the inspection

information, and the ships were then outfitted with sample flanges. GSI then visited the ships

to trial and review the GSI sampling approach in real

‐ world applications. This Guidebook

provides the method and lessons learned from this project activity. The sample ports will stay

in place for possible future use in research and compliance monitoring. Data gathered on living

organisms in ballast discharge sampled through this project will be provided to the State of

Minnesota and published on GSI’s website.



### S AMPLING 

### A PPROACH 

### O VERVIEW

It is important to note that hardware and personnel alone will not deliver useful sampling

exercises. The sampling team must also have a robust and valid test plan and standard

operating procedures to accompany any ship sampling exercise. The test plan will describe the

objectives of the test, the hypotheses, the experimental design, the analytical methods, and

quality control and quality assurance plan for the work. The standard operating procedures will

detail specific methods. The GSI website ( www.greatshipsinitiative.org ) includes test reports on

ship

‐ based ballast treatment research providing examples of these documents.

GSI designed the sampling approach described here to be applicable to a range of test plans. It

employs simultaneous, in

‐ line and continuous collection of large and small quantities of sample

water from subject ballast water discharge to estimate live organism densities and types in and

water quality characteristics of that discharge. The method is adaptable to a wide range of

sampling intensities and ships with diverse ballast line diameters, and ballast system types.

Details of the sampling approach are provided in subsequent chapters. Fundamentally, the

process involves:

 Prior installation of two permanent 4 inch diameter blind flanges in a strategically

selected segment of the ship’s ballast line (detailed below), and insertion of a

temporary sampling pitot in one such flange;

 Space and services on the ship to support sample collection (detailed below);

 A port

‐ based set

‐ up, sampling and ballast team of four people, and nearby analytical

space and equipment (detailed below); and

 A time window affording 45 minutes to one hour for sampling system set

‐ up and 45

minutes to one hour for its break

‐ down in addition to the selected sampling period

duration.

Figure 1 illustrates the GSI sampling system lay out. In summary, the installation of the blind

flanges—a relatively minor permanent change to the ship costing less than $5,000

‐‐ is

completed according to strict location guidelines well before sampling is to occur. At the time

of, or just prior to, the sampling event, an elbow shaped sampling pitot is installed in the

upstream flange to deliver flow to the sampling system. For zooplankton sampling (i.e.,

organisms equal to or greater than 50 micrometers in minimum dimension), sample flow fromPage 7 of 29

the discharge line is pumped from the sampling pitot at a known flow rate through a plastic line

equipped with a flow meter into a 35 micron plankton net that is suspended in a 50 gallon tub

with a level transmitter and a bottom discharge flange. The fraction of the ballast line flow

pumped through the sample port should remain constant throughout the sampling process.

This ratio is monitored using an in

‐ line magnetic flux flow meter on the sample line, and a

portable ultrasonic flow meter mounted to the ships ballast piping. A second pump draws spent

sample water from the 50 gallon tub through plastic line to the return flange in the ballast line

for discharge overboard with other ballast water. The water level in the tub is maintained at

near full as the net filters the plankton into a bottom cod

‐ end. A small side stream of the

sample water flow (pre

‐ plankton net) is directed into a carboy for whole water samples which

can be used to assess water quality, protists (i.e., organisms less than 50 micrometers and equal

to or greater than 10 micrometers in minimum dimension), bacteria (i.e., organisms less than

10 micrometers in minimum dimension), and effluent toxicity. Grab samples can be extracted

from the line (i.e., hose) feeding into the nets, or through a dedicated side port off the main

sample line which can be opened and closed. Sample analysis can take place on

‐ ship, but is

easiest to arrange off

‐ ship.

Figure 1. Schematic of the GSI Ship Discharge Sampling System and Component Parts.Page 8 of 29



## C HAPTER 

## 2: S AMPLE 

## P ORT 

## /R ETURN 

## P ORTS

GSI sample ports and return ports are installed as 4 “ 150 # ANSI flanges with blinds. GSI

employs stainless steel bent elbow style pitots (Figure 2) installed so that the opening faces into

the flow at the center of the pipe. GSI first determines the target sample volume per unit

ballast discharge based on experimental design criteria. Then it assures the internal diameter

of the pitot opening is large enough to assure that sample water pumped through the pitot will

provide that volume, but at a subisokinetic flow velocity that ranges between 44%

‐ 25% of the

discharge flow velocity of the ship. An isokinetic flow rate occurs within a pitot when the

sample water flow velocity is the same as discharge line flow velocity. A subisokinetic velocity

means there is a slower flow velocity in the pitot than in the line being sampled. Consistent

with recommendations by the United States Coast Guard to maintain a pitot inlet of 1.5

‐ 2.0

times the isokinetic diameter(USCG, 2008), GSI assumes that subisokinetic flow helps prevent

organism damage by edge interactions with pitot inlet and walls. Assuming most ballast

systems are designed for a flow rate of around 10 feet/second, the pitot sizes required to

collect a range of volume of sample water per hour is shown in Table 1.

Figure 2. Diagram of Elbow Pitot for Ballast Discharge Sampling.Page 9 of 29

Table 1. Relationship of Sample Pitot Diameter to Sample Water Flow Rate

Sample Pitot, Flow Rate at 10 ft/sec

Ranging From 1.5

‐ 2.0 Times The Isokinetic Diameter

Diameter

(in) 3/4 1 1 1/4 1 1/2 2 2 1/2 3 3 1/2 4

Flow

(Gal/Hr) 359.4

‐

202.2 597.8

–

36.3 1066.1

‐

599.7 1468.7

‐

826.1 2454.2

‐ 1380.5 3522.5

‐ 1981.4 5489.7

‐ 3087.9 7386.9

‐ 4155.1 9555.2

‐ 5374.8

Flow

(M3/Hr) 1.4

‐ 0.8 2.3

‐ 1.3 4

‐ 2.3 5.6

‐ 3.1 9.3

‐ 5.2 13.3

‐ 7.5 20.8

‐ 11.7 28

‐ 15.7 36.2

‐ 20.3



### S TEP	BY 

### S TEP 

### A PPROACH	TO 

### P ITOT 

### D IAMETER 

### S ELECTION

1. Determine Test Plan Sample Volume/Rate requirements (e.g., the test plan requires

6.0 m 3 in 2 hours or 3.0 m 3 /hr).

2. Assure the pump is capable of that flow rate.

3. Consult with the ship engineer to determine ship ballast discharge flow rate (usually

around 10 ft./sec., but not always).

4. Select a pitot diameter that assures the flow velocity is in the subisokinetic range of

44 %

‐ 25 % ballast discharge flow rate. If they ballast at 10 ft./sec, table 1 can be

used (e.g., For a desired flow rate of 3.0 m 3 /hr, per table 1, a 1.25" pitot can be used

since its valid range of 4.0

‐ 2.3 m 3 /hr).



### C RITERIA	FOR 

### S AMPLE 

### P ORT 

### L OCATION

The location of the sample port is critical to its ability to deliver representative samples of live

organisms in ballast discharge. Both fluid dynamic properties of a location, physical access and

safety considerations come into play. A suitable location for a return flow port is somewhat

simpler as the flow mechanics of the return location are unimportant, but locating it a

minimum of two pipe diameters down downstream of the sample port assures that it in no way

interferes with the sample port fluid dynamics. GSI uses the criteria detailed in Table 2 to guide

GSI selection of sample port location.Page 10 of 29

Table 2. GSI Criteria for Sample Port Location in a Ship Ballast System.

Criteria Reason

Single location services all tanks equally. A single sample point means fewer flanges are needed,

and less sampling effort is required.

Long length of straight pipe preceding the

sample port. Long lengths of straight pipe create a “fully developed”

flow characteristic, assuring water is well

‐ mixed at the

point of sampling, and samples are representative of

the discharge.

Locations as close to overboard as possible. Samples collected closer to discharge will more closely

represent the quality of water entering the receiving

system.

A suitable adjacent area for sample processing,

suitable for technician occupancy, and with

accessible light and power supply. A sample port alone won’t deliver a good sample.

Technicians must be able to work in proximity to it to

collect and process samples.

Necessary clearances to install the sample

pitot. The sample team or ship personnel must be able to

install and remove the pitot without damaging other

equipment.

Piping that can be isolated. Piping around the sample location must be isolated so

that the sample equipment can be safely installed or

removed.

No explosion or other hazards. Explosive environments require special equipment to

assure safety of the ship, crew and sampling team.



### S AMPLE 

### P ITOT 

### L OCATIONS	IN 

### B ALLAST 

### S YSTEMS 

### F OUND	ON 

### G REAT



### L AKES 

### ‐R ELEVANT 

### S HIPS 

### T YPES

A ballast system comprises the pump, sea chests and piping associated with moving ballast

water on and off the ship. Most ships have two ballast systems mirrored along the centerline

of the ship: one system services the port side tanks and the other the starboard tanks. Thus,

most ships require a minimum of two sample points for monitoring ballast discharge. Ballast

systems associated with ships in service on the Great Lakes can be quite different from eachPage 11 of 29

other, as will the best location for a sample point given the criteria noted in Table 2. During GSI

ship inspections, three fundamentally different types of ballast systems were identified:

 Distributed Manifold Ballast System (Figure 3): In a distributed manifold system a single

pump or pair of pumps is installed in the engine room with ballast main(s) traveling the

length of the ship. Branches off the main service each tank. Flow in or out of the tank is

controlled by manual or actuated valves at the ballast tank. This ballast system design

typically had straight lengths of pipe suitable for sampling locations in the ship tunnel.

Figure 3. Schematic of Distributed Manifold Ballast System Design.

 Centralized Manifold Ballast System (Figure 4): This ballast system style is similar to a

distributed manifold except each ballast tank has an individual line leading back to the

engine room; the lines combine prior to the pump. All the ballast system valves are

located together in the engine room.Page 12 of 29

Figure 4. Schematic of Centralized Manifold Ballast System Design.

 Multiple Independent Ballast Systems (Figure 5): Ships with multiple independent

ballast systems have no common piping between ballast tanks. Every ballast tank on

the ship has a separate sea chest, ballast pump and piping. This style of ballast system is

rare within and outside the Great Lakes.

Figure 5. Schematic of Multiple Independent Ballast System Design.Page 13 of 29



### P OWER 

### R EQUIREMENTS

Power requirements for sample collection systems should be kept to a minimum. The GSI

sampling system runs off of two 13 amp 120 volt circuits at 60 hertz. Although it has been easy

to find this supply on U.S. and Canadian ships it becomes more difficult with foreign vessels that

operate with different electrical standards



### P ITOT 

### C USTODY

The GSI team prefers to provide the pitot to the ship master for installation into the flange

sometime within a week or two prior to the ship’s arrival at the port at which sampling is

scheduled. After the sample visit the ship crew returns the pitot to the GSI sample team. GSI

does not install sample pitots permanently in the ships in order to assure that bio

‐ fouling inside

of the pitot does not bias sampling outcomes, and to assure that structural defects of the pitot

will not endanger ship operations. If necessary, GSI can install the pitot on the day of sampling,

but this approach expends limited time available for set

‐ up, and sample collection, processing

and analysis.

GSI recommends that pitots be owned by the testing agency and loaned to the ship being

evaluated. Upon pitot return after a sampling event the GSI team inspects the pitot for any

damage. Having the pitot belong to the sample team also puts the responsibility of maintaining

a specialized piece of equipment in the hands of those that will need to operate it. The research

team can then size the pitot aperture to deliver the desired flow to discharge ratio (i.e., volume

of sample water per unit volume of ballast discharge).



### S TEP 

### ‐B Y 

### ‐S TEP 

### P ROCESS	FOR 

### S AMPLE 

### P ORT 

### C OMMISSIONING

In summary, steps employed by GSI to identify and install sample ports on ships are as follows:

1. Pre

‐ Installation Ship Inspection. A ship inspection is conducted to identify and

document features of sample locations with potential to meet most or all of these

criteria. Also possible locations for a return flow port downstream of the sample port,

and sample processing, are assessed and identified at this time.

2. CFD Models. A qualified engineering firm models potentially suitable locations using

computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to determine which locations in fact provide well

‐

mixed samples of ballast discharge (i.e., have fully developed flow or are closest to fully

developed flow).

3. Installation Design to Ship Owner. Once a location is determined by the sample

inspection team the location is submitted to the ship owner for approval, class society

review and installation.

4. Flange Installation. Once the ship owner and agrees to the design, the ports can be

installed with blind flanges.

5. Pitot Installation. Prior to a sampling event the blind flange will be removed and

replaced with a sample pitot of an appropriate size.Page 14 of 29



## C HAPTER 

## 3: E QUIPMENT



## , S ET 

## U P AND 

## T EAR



## ‐ D OWN

GSI selected sampling equipment for its reliability and portability. All of the equipment and

components of the process described here are no greater than 45 lbs in weight. GSI includes

spare parts for critical components in case of component failure during sampling. Set up and

tear

‐ down of the sampling system consumes approximately one and one half hours each by

two technicians.



### S AMPLING 

### S YSTEM 

### C OMPONENTS

The following components comprised GSI’s sampling system:

Sample Pitot and Sample and Return Port Flange

Manufacturer: Custom designed and manufactured

Model: NA

Description: The flanges are custom made from 4” 304L stainless steel blind flanges. The

sample pitot is made from 1

‐ 1/4” sch. 40 304L stainless steel pipe. There is a 1

‐ 1/4” full port

ball valve with plug installed on the outlet of both to prevent leaking. The pitot is a 90 degree

elbow section of pipe sized to allow water to be collected from the center of the ballast line.

The elbow is mounted in the 4” sample port blind flange. The pitot aperture is sized to deliver

1.5

‐ 2 times isokinetic flow from the line being sampled. The return flange is a board flange with

threaded nipple welded to match the size of the pitot. Prior to testing the pitot is installed

inside the 4” sample port and the return flange is installed on the return port. See Figure 6 for

installation example.

Figure 6. Sample Pitot and Sample and Return Port Flange.Page 15 of 29

Electrical Cabinet

Manufacturer: Various Components assembled by Rockwell Automation

Model: N/A

Description: Contains the PLC, Motor Drives, and other necessary components to monitor and

control the system logic. See Figure 7 for installation example.

Figure 7. Electrical Cabinet.

Ultrasonic Flow Meter

Manufacturer: Fuji Electronics

Model: FSC w/FSD410B1 transmitters

Description: Sensors use ultrasonic waves to measure the flow velocity in a pipe and calculate

the flow rate. This is used to monitor the ballast discharge rate without needing to install

anything inside of the ships pipes. Figures 8 and 9 depict example ultrasonic flow meters and

flow meter transducers, respectively.Page 16 of 29

Figure 8. Ultrasonic Flow Meter.

Figure 9. Flow Meter Transducer.

Tub Level Transducer

Manufacturer: Ametek DrexelBrook

Model: 750 Series Well Watcher Submersible Level Transmitter

Description: A transducer (see Figure 10 for an example) is lowered to the bottom of the

sample tub where it monitors the level of the water in the tub.Page 17 of 29

Figure 10. Tub Level Transducer.

Sample Flow Meter

Manufacturer: Yamatake

Model: MTG18A

Description: A two

‐ wire electromagnetic flow meter monitors the flow rate of water being

sampled by the sampling system. See Figure 11 for an installation example.

Figure 11. Sample Flow Meter.Page 18 of 29

Sample Pump and Return Pump

Motor: Dayton 1TRZ6

Pump: Jabsco 777

‐ 9001

Coupling: Lovejoy AL095 & 68514471706

Frame: Custom built aluminum

Description: Both sample and return pumps are identical flexible impeller pumps. The sample

pump draws the water to from the ships ballast lines and pumps it to the sample tub. The

return pump removes the water from the sample tub and pumps it back into the ships ballast

lines. See Figure 12 for installation example.

Figure 12. Sample Pump.

Sample Tub

Manufacturer: RubberMaid

Model: 32 Gallon Heavy Duty trash can

Description: The trash can has been modified to include a bulkhead fitting with a valve on the

bottom to use as a water outlet, and an adjustable riser to hold the sample nets. See Figure 13

for an installation example.Page 19 of 29

Figure 13. Sample Tub.

Laptop

Manufacturer: Panasonic Semi

‐ rugged Toughbook

Model: CF

‐ 52

Description: The laptop provides the interface for running the Ballast Sampling Program and

data logging. The Toughbook provides some splash resistance and fall protection as well as

dust protection that is above what a typical laptop would provide. A secondary function of the

laptop is to provide access to equipment manual, troubleshooting guides and other useful

information while in the field. See Figure 14 for example.

Figure 14. Lap Top.Page 20 of 29



### H UMAN 

### M ACHINE 

### I NTERFACE 

### (HMI) S OFTWARE

The GSI shipboard sample equipment is controlled using FactoryTalk Historian ME. FactoryTalk

is a brand of HMI software that includes graphical representation (see Figure 15). Any HMI

software used to control sampling equipment should include the following abilities:

1. Control of pump actives through PLC loops,

2. Ability to set sample pump as a percent of ballast line flow,

3. Data Logging and live data display, and

4. Fault and warning notifications.

Figure 15. Sample Screen Image from GSI HMI Software.Page 21 of 29



### S AMPLE 

### G EAR

Sample gear included the following items:

Plankton Net and Cod

‐ End

Manufacturer: Sea

‐ Gear Corporation

Model: 9000 (30cm, 3:1, 35 micrometer mesh)

Description: Zooplankton samples are collected by concentrating the sample volume through a

35 micrometer mesh plankton net (i.e., 50 micrometers on the diagonal) into a 1 Liter cod

‐ end

for analysis. A minimum of one plankton net is required per sample. The plankton nets used by

GSI during shipboard sampling were purchased from Sea

‐ Gear Corporation of Melbourne,

Florida (Figure 16).

Figure 16. Plankton Net (35 micrometers with Attached 1 Liter Cod

‐ End.

Sample Collection Containers: Carboy, 20 Liter

Manufacturer: ULine

Model: S12768

Description: high

‐ density polyethylene (HDPE) containers for time

‐ integrated sample collection,

the type and quantity of which are dependent on the test plan. For example, the time

‐ integrated “seep” sample is collected using a 19 liter HDPE carboy (one per replicate; Figure

17). For collection of whole effluent two time

‐ integrated “seep” samples are collected; one for

whole water samples and one for whole effluent toxicity testing. From one time

‐ integrate

sample, total suspended solids and percent transmittance subsamples, as well as, whole waterPage 22 of 29

for analysis of protists are collected using HDPE sample bottles (Figure 17). Organic carbon

samples (i.e., non

‐ purgeable organic carbon and dissolved organic carbon) are collected using

125 mL glass sample bottles prepared by soaking in Micro

‐ 90® Concentrated Cleaning Solution

(Figure 17). Microbial samples (a minimum of three subsamples per carboy) are collected using

sterile 1 liter polypropylene bottles (not pictured). Extra sample containers should be carried

aboard.

Figure 17. Sample Collection Containers used for Shipboard Sampling Events.

Transport Coolers and Ice Packs

Description: To ensure sample integrity, proper sample holding and transport is of the upmost

importance. Following sample collection, sample bottles are immediately placed into small

sample transport coolers (Figure 18) and are kept cold until they are delivered to the sample

analysis personnel by using a minimum of two ice packs per cooler (Figure 18).Page 23 of 29

Figure 18. Small Sample Transport Cooler with Samples and Ice Packs.

YSI Multiparameter Water Quality Sonde with Data Display and Logging System

Manufacturer: YSI Incorporated (Yellow Springs, Ohio)

Model: YSI 6

‐ Series Model 6600 V2

‐ 4 Sonde and YSI 650MDS Data Logging System

Description: Water quality parameters are measured from the time

‐ integrated sample using a

YSI Multiparameter Water Quality Sonde (Figure 19). It is recommended that two Sondes be

brought onboard in case one of the Sondes is not functioning correctly. The 6600 V2

‐ 4 Sonde

(Figure 19) was used by GSI and included sensors to measure the following parameters: specific

conductivity, salinity, pH, temperature, dissolved oxgen (concentration and percent saturation),

turbidity, and total chlorophyll. The measured values are displayed using the YSI 650 MDS data

logger (Figure 20).Page 24 of 29

Figure 19. YSI 6

‐ Series Multiparameter Water Quality Sonde (YSI 6600 V2

‐ 4).

Figure 20. YSI 650 MDS Data Logging System.

Standard Operating Procedures, Test Plan, Datasheets and Laboratory Notebooks

Description: A copy of the Test Plan, as well as, the sample collection standard operating

procedures must be brought on board during the sampling event and must be readily accessible

to the sample collection team. The appropriate datasheets will be identified in the Test Plan

and extra datasheets should be brought onboard, along with extra pens (indelible ink only).

Data may also be recorded in laboratory notebooks, although pre

‐ printed datasheets are

preferred due to the increased efficiency of data recording.



### P ERSONAL 

### P ROTECTIVE 

### G EAR	AND 

### D RESS

The equipment listed below is the recommendation and in most cases the required protective

gear for personnel involved with the shipboard ballast sampling and operation of the

equipment. The requirements of the vessels or the facilities through which the vessels are

accessed may vary and the sample team is expected to follow safety procedures required of the

dock or ship, including Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements.

 Hardhat

 Steel toe boots

 Safety Glasses

 Hearing Protection (ear plugs or muffs, or in some cases both may be advisable)Page 25 of 29

 Flashlight or headlamp

 Work Gloves

 Work Clothing

– work clothing should cover arms and legs, and fit in a manner as to

not create a safety hazard. Jewelry (including rings) is not recommended and on

many facilities not allowed.

 Transportation Worker Identification Card (TWIC)

– Some facilities require for

access.



### E QUIPMENT 

### S ET	UP	AND 

### T EAR 

### ‐D OWN

Equipment loading and unloading to and from the ship should be as swift as possible to

minimize disruption to ship operations, and to avoid the possibility of needing to re

‐ route entry

during the loading. Two to four people can effectively accomplish set up and tear down within

45 minutes to one hour for each operation. It is advisable to have one member of the set

‐ up

team assigned to sonic flow meter set

‐ up while the others bring the rest of the gear to the

sampling location since flow meter wet up can be time consuming. Make sure that hose unions

have the rubber grommet installed and that all connections are proper and snug. Equipment

should be laid out with consideration to:

 Keeping walkways clear of wires and other equipment,

 Keeping wires and hoses neat, using wire ties to secure hoses and wiring out of the

way, and

 Planning for good work flow.

Once all of the hoses are installed, the valves may be opened on the sample and return ports

and at the pumps and sample tub. With the software program in manual mode, verify pump

rotation by powering the pump motor for a few seconds while someone checks for rotation. If

the pump does not turn, the motor should be disconnected from the electrical cabinet and the

guard removed to allow the pump to be manually turned over several times. This usually

should require a “Lockout/Tagout” procedure. The guard should then be reinstalled and the

pump rechecked.

During equipment tear

‐ down, first close the sample port and return port valves and secure the

plugs. GSI’s Ballast Sampling System is designed to automatically empty the sample tub at the

conclusion of a test. Depending on the amount of water left in the sample tub, it may be best

to place the control program into manual mode and completely drain the sample tub of water,

tilting the sample tub to get the water into the drain. The sample lines must be manually

emptied into the sample tub. Other tasks are:

 Packing the pump for removal,

 Removing the hoses from the sample pitots via unions,

 Shutting the valve on the return port to prevent any flow that may otherwise push

back through the return pump,Page 26 of 29

 Backing up the data log file separately from the laptop,

 Packing and removing from the vessel the remainder of the hose, wiring, and

equipment,

 Conducting a final visual check to assure that all equipment and personal items have

been removed, and

 Ensuring that both the Sample and Return port valves are fully closed and the plugs

firmly installed.



## C HAPTER 

## 4: O UTCOMES AND 

## R ECOMMENDATIONS

Overall the sampling method and supporting equipment performed well during GSI’s ship visits.

GSI successfully loaded, set up and operated the sampling process described here within a

feasible time window, and “left no trace” upon departing the ship, except for the pitot flange,

which was removed later by the ship crew.



### C OSTS

The costs of carrying out a sampling event using this method (excluding scientific supplies

associated with sample analysis) are detailed in Table 3.

Table 3. GSI Costs Per Sampling Event.

One

‐ Time Costs Cost Factor Time/Cost

Ship Inspection $1,500

Installation of flanges in a ship $2,000

‐ $5,000

Reuseable Operational Equipment $45,000

Biological Sampling Equipment $500

‐ $2000, depending on Test Plan

Set up and Tear Down of Sampling Equipment 1.5

– 2 hrs (total) assuming 2

‐ 3 staff

Per Sampling Event

Costs Sample Collection Staff Time TBD, depending on Test Plan

Staff Travel TBD, depending on Test Plan



### E QUIPMENT 

### P ERFORMANCE

Sampling operational equipment performed as expected with the following exceptions:

The Ultra

‐ Sonic Flow Meter on the ships’ ballast discharge line performed inconsistently and

unreliably

, jeopardizing the extent to which representativeness of the sample can be proven. ItPage 27 of 29

is important to sample a constant fraction of the ballast line flow through using an in

‐ line

magnetic flux flow meter on the sample line, and a portable ultrasonic flow meter mounted to

the ships ballast piping. If one of these monitors is inconsistent, there is no direct means to

assure that the sample volume and the flow volumes are proportional throughout the sampling

process. Without this information, it becomes difficult to translate organisms per unit volume

in the sample to organisms per unit volume in the ballast discharge:

ሻݎ݁ݐ݉݁	ݓ݋݂݈	ݔݑ݂݈	݅ܿݐ݉ܽ݃݊݁	݈݅݊݅݊݁ሺ	݁ݐܴܽ	ݓ݋݈ܨ	݈݁݌ܵܽ݉

ሻݎ݁ݐ݉݁	ݓ݋݂݈	݊݅ܿ݋ݏܽݎݐ݈ݑ	ܾ݈ܽ݁ݐݎ݋݌ሺ	݁ݐܴܽ	ݓ݋݈ܨ	݅݊݁ܮ	ݐݏ݈݈ܽܽܤ ݐܽ݊ݐݏ݊݋ܥ ൌ

The ultrasonic flow meter was also difficult to mount properly. It is highly recommended that

ship owners and authorities encourage treatment system developers to include flow meters in

their systems that have a proven in situ performance to within 3 %. It is also recommended to

have a standardized output connection so that the sample team can make use of that flow

meter to facilitate the constant percent sampling necessary for a representative sample.

It was necessary to tune up the PLC Control Loop. Because the sampling equipment is used on

a number of different ships each having different arrangements, flow rates and pressures,

sometimes it is necessary to fine

‐ tune the automation of the sample system to prevent

unstable rates or oscillating rates of the sample flow. It is recommended that the PLC control

loop parameters be available, i.e. the Gain, Reset and Rate.

The 32 Gallon heavy duty tub (sample collection barrel) though strong and light was awkward

to bring aboard. Attaching backpack straps in the future may remedy this. Delivery of the 19

liter carboys for effluent toxicity testing was improved by placing each carboy inside a frame

backpack for navigation from the sampling location to the dock.



### R ECOMMENDATIONS

Key lessons learned in terms of sample event planning and staffing were:

Scheduling of the sampling event is subject to changes in weather, ship equipment, and port

schedules. Even when the ship has docked, the schedule is still subject to change. Depending

on each ship and each cargo load, the ballasting and deballasting operation varies and may start

and stop at various times, i.e., 6 hours of sampling may actually take 12 hours. Fresh sampling

and analysis personnel are essential to quality data. It is recommended that sampling and

analysis crew shifts of 24 hours be in place to address schedule contingencies.

Equipment set

‐ up and break

‐ down is easier when shared among several team members.

Initially, the engineers were more familiar with the equipment set

‐ up. As more sampling events

took place, personnel became familiarized with the set

‐ up and break

‐ down and could therefore

provide more support and assistance in those areas.Page 28 of 29

The ship pumping schedule is subject to variation making “beginning, middle and end” grab

samples difficult to plan

. The ballast pump (or pumps) move water at a rate that may be faster

than the loading of cargo, resulting in starting and stopping of the pump (and therefore

sampling). As a result, determining three sets of discrete grab samples spaced approximately

near the beginning, middle and end proves difficult. One hour samples seemed to work for all

parties (i.e., each sample was one hour of collection). The test plan should require that a certain

volume, duration, or number of tanks of ballast water discharge be sampled instead.

Have a dedicated handling and sample transport person. This additional person allows

maximum support aboard the ship and efficient delivery of the samples. This person could also

return the previous samples’ cooler and ice packs to ship personnel, eliminating the need to

carry multiple transport equipment aboard the ship.



### C ONCLUSIONS

The operational method for sampling ship discharge described in this Guidebook is a feasible

and cost

‐ effective approach which can yield representative samples for a range of experimental

objectives. It appears to be applicable to most ships which ply the Great Lakes. The costs of the

exercise are dominated by one

‐ time investment in operational equipment. Installation of

sample ports on ships is a relatively minor one

‐ time expense. Costs of deployment of the

sampling team and sample analysis are largely dictated by the test plan under consideration,

and the number of schedule changes associated with the ship visit.



## R EFERENCES

GSI (2011). Great Ships Initiative (GSI) Quality Management Plan. Northeast

‐ Midwest Institute,

Washington, DC.

IMO (2004). International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships Ballast Water

and Sediments. As adopted by consensus at a Diplomatic Conference at IMO, London, England,

February 13 2004.

NSF International (September, 2010). Generic Protocol for the Verification of Ballast Water

Treatment Technology. Version 5.1. EPA/600/R

‐ 10/146. Produced for the USEPA,

Environmental Technology Verification Program in Conjunction with U.S. Coast Guard,

Environmental Standards Division and U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Center for Corrosion

Science and Engineering. NSF International, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

United States Coast Guard (2008). Analysis of Ballast Water Sampling Port Designs Using

Computational Fluid Dynamics. United States Coast Guard, Research and Development Center,

Report No. CG

‐ D

‐ 01

‐ 08. February 2008.Page 29 of 29



## A PPENDIX 

## 1

‐ MV I NDIANA 

## H ARBOR 

## S AMPLE 

## L OCATION



## I NSPECTION 

## R EPORTAMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.A. 

# MV Indiana Harbor Sample

Location InspectionAMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.A. 

## MV Indiana Harbor Sample Location Inspection

Great Ships Initiative

March 14, 2011

Contents

Purpose of Inspection ......................................................................................................... ............. 3

Criteria to Guide Selection of Sample Port Location ..................................................................... 3

Ship Description............................................................................................................... ............... 4

MV Indiana Harbor Inspection .................................................................................................. ..... 4

MV Indiana Harbor Ballasti ng System Description ....................................................................... 4

Findings....................................................................................................................... .................... 5

Recommendations: .............................................................................................................. ............ 6

References .................................................................................................................... ................... 6

Appendix A – MV Indiana Harbor Inspection Survey Form ......................................................... 7

GSI CONTACT :

Tyler Schwerdt, AMI Consulting Engineers P.A.

tyler.schwerdt@amiengineers.com

Ph: (715) 718-2193 Ext. 18

Fax: (877) 761-7058AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.A. 

### Purpose of Inspection

In 2010, the Great Ships Initiativ e (GSI) received funding from the Legislative Citizen’s

Commission on Minnesota Resources, the Mari time Administration and the Great Lakes

Protection Fund to assist in the design, inspecti on, installation and testing of ballast discharge

sampling apparati and processes on 10 commercial cargo ships operating in the Great Lakes.

The goal of this GSI project is to develop, test and evaluate best ballast discharge sampling

approaches relevant to Great Lakes shipping. As such, the project will install and trial ballast

water discharge sampling systems using guidelines a nd methods developed to be as consistent as

possible with those proposed by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), as well as the

United States Environmental Protection Agen cy’s Environmental Technology Verification

Program. Upon identification of the best possi ble locations for insta llation of the proposed

ballast discharge sampling approach, GSI in coordination with the ship owners will outfit the

vessels with 4” sample ports. After installation, th e ships will be vis ited by GSI research

personnel to trial and review the sampling syst em, and collect biological samples using the

sampling system. The sample ports will stay in place for possible future use in research, type

approval testing and/or compliance monitoring.

This report summarizes GSI’s recommendations for installing a ballast discharge sampling

system onboard the MV Indiana Harbor -- a Great Lakes self-unloading bulk freighter operated

by American Steamship Company of Williamsville, New York.



### Criteria to Guide Selection of Sample Port Location

Among other engineering requirements, sample por t locations onboard the target vessels will

ideally be at points in the ball ast discharge line with fully deve loped turbulent flow. Most ships

will not have a location that meets all criteria, so engineering judgment will guide determinations

of the best sample locations available. GSI crit eria for sample location include locations that:

 Service all tanks equally by a single sample location is best if available.

 Are preceded by long lengths of straight pipe (USCG, 2008).

 Are close to overboard providi ng representative discharge sa mples in terms of proximity

to the point of entry into the receiving system.

 Are nearby to a suitable area for sample pr ocessing, including adequate space for one 50

gallon open top barrel, sample bottle c oolers and a technician.

 Have adequate lighting, power , and potable rinse water.

GSI team members will document through photographs and measurements all sample locations

with potential to meet most or all of these crite ria during a vessel visit. Each possible location

will then be modeled using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to determine whether there is

fully developed flow at that loca tion (that is, water passing that lo cation is in a well mixed state).

Also possible locations for a retu rn flow port downstream of the sample port will be assessed; a

suitable location for a return flow port is anywhe re downstream of the sample port as long as the

location does not interfere with the fully developed flow at the sample port.AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.A. 

### Ship Description

The MV Indiana Harbor is a Great Lakes self- unloading bulk freighter operated by American

Steamship Company of Williamsville, New York. Bu ilt in 1979, the vessel has an overall length

of 1,000 ft., a beam of 105 ft., and a depth of 56 ft. She is powered by four 3500 HP General

Motors Electro Motive Division (EMD) diesel engines and has a deadweight capacity at MS

Draft of 80,900 Gross Tons. The vessel is primar ily used for long-haul transport of iron ore

pellets and western coal on the upper four Great Lakes.

In terms of her ballast system, the MV Indiana Harbor has 18 ballast tanks including forepeak

and afterpeak, four ballast pumps at 13,000 gp m each (52,000 gpm total), and a total ballast

capacity of 16,424,360 US gallons (62,166 m3)..



### MV Indiana Harbor Inspection

GSI personnel from AMI Engineers’ Joe Radni ecki P.E. and Tyler Schwerdt boarded the MV

Indiana Harbor on January 8 th , 2011. The vessel was loading ir on ore at the CN docks of Two

Harbors, MN at the time of the inspection. The engineers received a guided tour of the ship from

Chief Engineer Ralph Biggs. Throughout the t our, the AMI representatives completed the

attached survey form (Appendix A) in consultation with the ship crew. Im portant features of the

ship’s ballast system lay-out also were recorded photographically.



### MV Indiana Harbor Ballasting System Description

The starboard and port sides of the MV Indiana Harbor each operate an independent ballast

system with the exception of a cr ossover that can be used to connect the two systems offering

redundancy in the case of mechanic al failure. The ballast sy stems are symmetrical around the

centerline of the ship. The ballas t system for each side of the ship uses the same two pumps run

simultaneously for both ballasting and deballastin g depending on the valve arrangement. Except

for the engine room most of the

ships ballast piping is inside of the

ballast tanks. Branches from the

main line leading to individual tanks

loop outside of the ballast tank wall

into the ship tunnel for valve access.

See the picture to the right. On the

interior of the tank the pipe turns 90

degrees downward and terminates in

a bellmouth close to the tank floor.

The portion of piping inside the tank

was not inspected as it was not

accessible during the visit.AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.A. 

### Findings

The best location for installation of a ballast di scharge sampling system onboard the MV Indiana

Harbor, i.e. which fits the GSI location criter ia, including fluid dynamic recommendations and

processing requirements, is in the vessel’s engine room at a point in the piping after flows from

both pumps have combined. This location can serve one half of the ship’s ballast tanks under

typical circumstances, and both sides under excep tional circumstances. A photo of the location

is shown below looking down the length of the head er towards discharge on the starboard side.

The photo was taken standing in a suitable sample processing area that is immediately adjacent

to the sample collection location.

The area pictured above was analyzed with computational fluid mechanics to insure its

acceptability for sampling. Although the flow at th is point is not fully de veloped it is the closest

to fully developed available on the existing piping.

Flow

from

Pair of

Ballast

Pumps Recommended

Sample

LocationAMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.A. 

### Recommendations:

GSI recommends placing the sampling port in the MV Indiana Harbor’s engine room

downstream of where the two pump flows merge together before di scharge on the port side for

the following reasons:

Positives

Post-pump location gives a better picture of ballast system induced mortality.

Sample location can service half of the sh ips ballast tanks from a single location.

Available lighting, power and wash water.

Pipe length and arrangement delivers the cl osest to fully developed flow available.

Location can be isolated.

Existing sample ports nearby can be used for return flow.

Nearby processing and analysis areas.

Due to installation being on st raight length standard sampli ng port and pitot can be used.

Negatives

Not fully developed flow, but it is the closest to fully de veloped available.

For the purpose of this project a sampling locati on servicing the port si de of the MV Indiana

Harbor from the engine room is sufficient. Th e sample location on the port side is recommended

based on the ships current arrangement. Modifica tions caused by the addition of a ballast water

treatment system may require the sample lo cation(s) to be moved or modified.

Note relevant to upcoming NaOH ballast treatment trials on this ship : If sampling needs to

target a subset of ballast tanks such as th at planned for summer 2011 to test the NaOH/CO 2 ballast treatment system, it is s till recommended to sample at th e above location (in the engine

room) as opposed to the tunnel proximate to the treated tanks discharge to the ballast system.

Installing a sample port closer to a specific set of tanks would require a sample port for each of

the targeted tanks. The majority of the ballas t piping upstream of the engine room is on the

interior of the tanks and inaccessible. The only accessible piping is an elbow such that the

standard sample port and pitot design would have to be custom designed and modified.



### References

U.S. Coast Guard Research and Development Center / CG-D01-08 (2008), Analysis of Ballast

Water Sampling Port Designs Usi ng Computational Fluid Dynamics.AMI CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.A. 

### Appendix A

– MV Indiana Harbor Inspection Survey Form