Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 160 / Tuesday, August 19, 1997 / Notices 44107

margin calculation program. See

Clerical Error Memorandum at page 3.

Comment 3: Petitioners argue that the

Department introduced new computer

programming lines and values in the

constructed value section of its margin

calculation program and that the new

lines failed to function properly because

the new values were overwritten by old

values. Therefore, petitioners state that

the Department should correct this error

in its programming.

Department’s Position: We agree with

petitioners. Therefore, for these

amended final results we have corrected

the constructed value section of our

margin calculation program. See

Clerical Error Memorandum at pp. 4–5.

Amended Final Results of Review

As a result of our review, we have

determined that the following margins

exist:

Manufacturer/

Exporter Time period

Margin

(percent)

Dofasco, Inc .. 8/1/94–7/31/95 0.59

CCC, Ltd ....... 8/1/94–7/31/95 1,31

Stelco, Inc ..... 8/1/94–7/31/95 0.55

Pursuant to section 353.28 of the

Department’s regulations, parties to the

proceeding will have five days after the

date of publication of this notice to

notify the Department of any new

ministerial or clerical errors, as well as

five days thereafter to rebut any

comments by parties.

The Department shall determine, and

the Customs Service shall assess,

antidumping duties on all appropriate

entries. Individual differences between

sales to the United States and normal

value may vary from the percentages

stated above. The Department will issue

appraisement instructions directly to

the Customs Service.

Furthermore, the following deposit

requirements will be effective, upon

publication of this notice of amended

final results of review for all shipments

of certain corrosion-resistant carbon

steel flat products from Canada, entered,

or withdrawn from warehouse, for

consumption on or after the publication

date, as provided for by section

751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit

rates for the reviewed companies will be

the rates for those firms as stated above

(except that if the rate is de minimis,

i.e., less than 0.5 percent, a cash deposit

rate of zero will be required for that

company); (2) for previously

investigated companies not listed above,

the cash deposit rate will continue to be

the company-specific rate published for

the most recent period; (3) if the

exporter is not a firm covered in this

review, or the original investigation, but

the manufacturer is, the cash deposit

rate will be the rate established for the

most recent period for the manufacturer

of the merchandise; and (4) the cash

deposit rate for all other manufacturers

will be the ‘‘all others’’ rate made

effective by the final results of the 1993–

1994 administrative review of these

orders (see Certain Corrision-Resistant

Carbon Steel Flat Products and Certain

Cut-to-Length Steel Plate from Canada;

Final Results of Antidumping

Administrative Reviews, 61 FR 13815

(March 28, 1996)).

These deposit requirements, when

imposed, shall remain in effect until

publication of the final results of the

next administrative review.

This notice serves as a final reminder

to importers of their responsibility

under 19 CFR 353.26 to file a certificate

regarding the reimbursement of

antidumping duties prior to liquidation

of the relevant entries during this

review period. Failure to comply with

this requirement could result in the

Secretary’s presumption that

reimbursement of antidumping duties

occurred and the subsequent assessment

of double antidumping duties.

This notice also serves as a reminder

to parties subject to administrative

protective order (APO) of their

responsibility concerning the

disposition of proprietary information

disclosed under APO in accordance

with section 353.34(d) of the

Department’s regulations. Timely

notification of return/destruction of

APO materials or conversion to judicial

protective order is hereby requested.

Failure to comply with the regulations

and the terms of an APO is a

sanctionable violation.

This amendment of final results of

administrative review and notice are in

accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the

Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)) and 19 CFR

353.22.

Dated: August 12, 1997.

Robert S. LaRussa,

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–21961 Filed 8–18–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–475–818]

Certain Pasta From Italy: Notice of

Extension of Time Limit for New

Shipper Antidumping Duty

Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 19, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John Brinkmann or Sunkyu Kim, Office

of AD/CVD Enforcement II, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;

telephone (202) 482–5288 or 482–2613,

respectively.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

(the Department) is extending the time

limit for the preliminary results in the

new shipper administrative review of

the antidumping duty order on certain

pasta from Italy. The period of review is

July 1, 1996, through January 31, 1997.

This extension is made pursuant to the

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the

Uruguay Round Agreements Act (‘‘the

Act’’) and the Department’s regulations

as published in the Federal Register on

May 11, 1995 (60 FR 25130).

Postponement of Preliminary Results of

Review

On February 20, 1997, the Department

initiated this new shipper

administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on certain pasta

from Italy (62 FR 8927, February 27,

1997). The current deadline for the

preliminary results is August 19, 1997.

Pursuant to 19 CFR 353.22(h)(7), the

Department has determined that this

case is extraordinarily complicated and

as such is extending the deadline for

issuing the preliminary results. This

extension is necessary to provide the

Department additional time to consider

certain issues of complex nature

including the appropriate basis for

calculating constructed export price and

the nature of affiliation between the

parties involved in this review.

In accordance with 19 CFR

353.22(h)(7), the Department will

extend the time for completion of the

preliminary results of this new shipper

review to no later than December 17,

1997. We plan to issue the final results

within 90 days after the date the

preliminary results are issued.
44108 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 160 / Tuesday, August 19, 1997 / Notices

Dated: August 13, 1997.

Richard W. Moreland,

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–21960 Filed 8–18–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–201–504]

Certain Porcelain-on-Steel Cookware

From Mexico; Notice of Extension of

Time Limit for Antidumping Duty

Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 19, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate

Johnson or Dolores Peck at (202) 482–

4929, or Mary Jenkins at (202) 482–

1756, Office of AD/CVD Enforcement,

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, DC 20230.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

(the Department) is extending the time

limit for the preliminary results of the

tenth administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on porcelainon-steel cookware from Mexico for the

period December 1, 1995, through

November 30, 1996. This extension is

made pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930,

as amended by the Uruguay Round

Agreements Act (hereinafter, ‘‘the Act’’).

POSTPONEMENT: Under the Act, the

Department may extend the deadline for

completion of an administrative review

if it determines it is not practicable to

complete the review within the

statutory time limit of 365 days. The

Department finds that it is not

practicable to complete the tenth

administrative review of certain

porcelain-on-steel cookware from

Mexico within this time limit.

In accordance with section

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department

will extend the time for completion for

the preliminary results of this review

from a 245-day period to no later than

a 365-day period. Therefore, the final

results are now due by December 31,

1997.

Dated: August 13, 1997.

Jeffrey P. Bialos,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for

Import Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–21962 Filed 8–18–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

North American Free-Trade

Agreement, Article 1904; NAFTA Panel

Reviews; Request for Panel Review

AGENCY: NAFTA Secretariat, United

States Section, International Trade

Administration, Department of

Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of First Request for Panel

Review.

SUMMARY: On August 8, 1997, Hylsa,

S.A. de C.V. filed a First Request for

Panel Review with the United States

Section of the NAFTA Secretariat

pursuant to Article 1904 of the North

American Free Trade Agreement. Panel

review was requested of the final

antidumping administrative review

made by the International Trade

Administration, respecting Circular

Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe and Tube

from Mexico. This determination was

published in 62 FR 37014, on July 10,

1997. The NAFTA Secretariat has

assigned Case Number USA–97–1904–

06 to this request.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James R. Holbein, United States

Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite

2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue,

Washington, D.C. 20230, (202) 482–

5438.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter

19 of the North American Free-Trade

Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’) establishes a

mechanism to replace domestic judicial

review of final determinations in

antidumping and countervailing duty

cases involving imports from a NAFTA

country with review by independent

binational panels. When a Request for

Panel Review is filed, a panel is

established to act in place of national

courts to review expeditiously the final

determination to determine whether it

conforms with the antidumping or

countervailing duty law of the country

that made the determination.

Under Article 1904 of the Agreement,

which came into force on January 1,

1994, the Government of the United

States, the Government of Canada and

the Government of Mexico established

Rules of Procedure for Article 1904

Binational Panel Reviews (‘‘Rules’’).

These Rules were published in the

Federal Register on February 23, 1994

(59 FR 8686).

A first Request for Panel Review was

filed with the U.S. Section of the

NAFTA Secretariat, pursuant to Article

1904 of the Agreement, on August 8,

1997, requesting panel review of the

final administrative review described

above.

The Rules provide that:

(a) a Party or interested person may

challenge the final determination in

whole or in part by filing a Complaint

in accordance with Rule 39 within 30

days after the filing of the first Request

for Panel Review (the deadline for filing

a Complaint is September 8, 1997);

(b) a Party, investigating authority or

interested person that does not file a

Complaint but that intends to appear in

support of any reviewable portion of the

final determination may participate in

the panel review by filing a Notice of

Appearance in accordance with Rule 40

within 45 days after the filing of the first

Request for Panel Review (the deadline

for filing a Notice of Appearance is

September 22, 1997); and

(c) the panel review shall be limited

to the allegations of error of fact or law,

including the jurisdiction of the

investigating authority, that are set out

in the Complaints filed in the panel

review and the procedural and

substantive defenses raised in the panel

review.

Dated: August 12, 1997

James R. Holbein,

United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 97–21845 Filed 8–18–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–GT–M

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Submission for OMB Review;

Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

The Department of Defense has

submitted to OMB for clearance, the

following proposal for collection of

information under the provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

Chapter 35).

Title and OMB Number: Defense

Federal Acquisition Regulation

Supplement Subparts 227.71, Rights in

Technical Data, and 227.72, Rights in

Computer Software and Computer

Software Documentation, and related

clauses at 252.227; OMB Number 0704–

0369.

Type of Request: Extension.

Number of Respondents: 1,719,472.

Responses Per Respondent: 6

(approximately).

Annual Responses: 10,560,868.

Average Burden Per Response: 32

minutes.

Annual Burden Hours: 5,566,939.

Needs and Uses: This requirement

provides for the collection of necessary