alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 171 (Thursday, September 4, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 46707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23437]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-189, RM-9135]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Nassawadox, VA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by Ken 
Robol requesting the allotment of Channel 252A to Nassawadox, Virginia, 
as the community's first local aural transmission service. Channel 252A 
can be allotted to Nassawadox in compliance with the Commission's 
minimum distance separation requirements without the imposition of a 
site restriction. The coordinates for Channel 252A at Nassawadox are 
37-28-24 NL and 75-51-30 WL.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before October 20, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before November 4, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: Ken 
Robol, 303 Amherst Court, Chesapeake, Virginia 23320 (petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-189, adopted August 
20, 1997, and released August 29, 1997. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M 
Street, NW, Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also 
be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 
857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW, Suite 140, Washington, DC 20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-23437 Filed 9-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### F. M. CHRISTIE, Appellant, v. Raymond F. ADAMS, Clayton D. Elliott and Florida Power & Light Company, Appellees.

No. 77-391.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 13, 1978.

Rehearing Denied July 14, 1978.

Milton M. Ferrell, Herbert A. Warren, Miami, for appellant.

Steel, Hector & Davis and Paul J. Bona-via, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellant, plaintiff below, appeals a final judgment entered pursuant to a directed verdict in favor of appellees, defendants below.

In our opinion the trial court acted correctly in entering a directed verdict at the close of appellant’s case. We have carefully reviewed the record and find that, even by considering all of the evidence in the light most favorable to appellant, it fails to reflect that appellant demonstrated a prima facie case of malicious prosecution against appellees. Appellant adduced no sufficient evidence to show the absence of probable cause for the criminal charges which appellees caused to be brought against him. *Duval Jewelry Co. v. Smith,*102 Fla. 717, 136 So. 878 (1931); Ward v. *Allen,*152 Fla. 82, 11 So.2d 193 (1942); *Applestein v. Preston,*335 So.2d 604 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); *Sponder v. Brickman,*214 So.2d 631 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); and *Wilson v. O’Neal,*118 So.2d 101 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960). Accordingly, the trial *34court acted correctly in entering a directed verdict in favor of appellees at the close of appellant’s case.

Affirmed.
#### Mace SIEGEL and Goodrich Realty & Development Group, Inc. d/b/a Macerich Real Estate Company II and Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company (A Tennessee Corporation) both d/b/a Jackson Mall Shopping Center Company v. HUNT & WHITAKER, INC.

No. 49538.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 3, 1977.

Young, Scanlon & Sessums, Brad Ses-sums, Jackson, for appellant.

Butler, Snow, O’Mara, Stevens & Canna-da; Lawrence J. Franck, Rhesa H. Barks-dale, Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Hinds County; James Arden Barnett, Chancellor.

Before INZER, P. J., and ROBERTSON and WALKER, JJ., and KERMIT R. COF-ER, Commissioner.

AFFIRMED.
kmph-ex102_27.htm


 

Exhibit 10.2

 

Amendment to 

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement

 

This Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of October 13, 2015 (this “Amendment”) by and among KemPharm, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and R. LaDuane Clifton (the “Executive”).  

Background

A. The Company and Executive previously entered into that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of June 25, 2015 (the “Employment Agreement”)

B.Pursuant to Section 16.F of the Employment Agreement, the Employment Agreement may be amended by a written instrument between the Company and the Executive; and

C.The Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement as provided herein.

Amendment

For and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties to this Amendment hereby agree as follows:

1.Amendment to Section 2.C.  Section 2.C of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety by the following:

“C. Equity Compensation. Upon the terms and conditions set forth in the following subsection, Company shall grant to Executive an option to purchase shares of Company’s common stock (“Common Stock”) pursuant to and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Company's 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, or a successor plan (the “Plan”) and Company’s form of option or stock grant agreement, as applicable. On or after the Effective Date, Company shall grant Executive stock options to purchase 45,000 shares of Common Stock (the “Option”). The Option shall have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock as of the grant date of the Option. The Option shall vest in equal shares over a four-year period commencing from the date of grant and, with 25% of the options vesting on the one-year anniversary of the Effective Date, and then the remainder of unvested options vesting on an annual basis thereafter until such time that all such shares are fully vested and exercisable, provided, that all options granted pursuant to this Section 2.C, and each other outstanding equity award granted to Executive, shall accelerate so as to be fully vested and immediately exercisable immediately prior to any Change in Control (as defined in the Plan) of the Company.”

2.This Amendment shall become effective immediately upon execution by the Company and the Executive.

3.Other than as set forth in this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

[Signature Page Follows]

 




 

In Witness Whereof, the parties have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the date first written above.

 

 

 

COMPANY:

 

KemPharm, Inc.

 

By: /s/ Travis Mickle

Name: Travis Mickle

Title: President and CEO

 




 




 

In Witness Whereof, the parties have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the date first written above.

 

 

EXECUTIVE:

 

/s/ R. LaDuane Clifton

R. LaDuane Clifton
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Marshall HUGHES, Jr.

No. 61730.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 28, 1978.

Maurice T. Hattier, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Louise' S. Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit
21

List
of Subsidiaries of Image Sensing Systems, Inc.

|                                               |  |                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name of
 Subsidiaries                          |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization                             
|                                               |  |                                                                           
|Flow Traffic Ltd.                              |  | Hong Kong Special
 Administrative Region of the Peoples Republic of China
|                                               |  |                                                                           
|Image Sensing Systems Europe Limited           |  | United Kingdom                                                            
|                                               |  |                                                                           
|Image Sensing Systems Europe Limited SP.Z.O.O. |  | Poland                                                                    
|                                               |  |                                                                           
|ISS Image Sensing Systems Canada Ltd.          |  | British Columbia, Canada                                                  
|                                               |  |                                                                           
|ISS Canada Sales Corp.                         |  | British Columbia, Canada                                                  

51

---
Exhibit 10.10(a)


 


HORACE MANN SERVICE CORPORATION

EXECUTIVE CHANGE IN CONTROL PLAN


 


SCHEDULE A PARTICIPANTS


 


Note: The effective date of entry shall be subject to Section
4.2(a).


 


	NAME OR TITLE	 	EFFECTIVE DATE

OF

PARTICIPATION*
	 	 	 
	TIER I PARTICIPANTS
	President and CEO	 	May 16, 2013
	 	 	 
	TIER II PARTICIPANTS
	EVP and CFO	 	**
	EVP and CMO	 	 
	EVP, Annuity, Life, Group	 	February 15, 2012
	 	 	 
	TIER III PARTICIPANTS
	SVP and CHRO	 	June 4, 2014


 


* Subject to acceptance within 30 days of effective date of
participation


** Subject to Section 4.2(b) of the Plan


 


Last updated: July 20, 2015


 




    	1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 168 (Friday, August 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23036]



[[Page 45802]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EG97-77-000]


Zond Windsystem Partners, Ltd., Series 85-A, a California Limited 
Partnership; Notice of Amendment to Application for Determination of 
Exempt Wholesale Generator Status

August 26, 1997.
    On August 25, 1997, Zond Windsystem Partners, Ltd., Series 85-A, a 
California Limited Partnership, 13000 Jameson Road, Tehachapi, 
California 93561, filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
an amendment to its application.
    Any person desiring to be heard concerning the application for 
exempt wholesale generator status should file a motion to intervene or 
comments with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.211 
and 385.214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. The 
Commission will limit its consideration of comments to those that 
concern the adequacy or accuracy of the application. All such motions 
and comments should be filed on or before September 8, 1997 and must be 
served on applicant. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
 Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23036 Filed 8-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

MAR 2 7 2015 

Mr. Traylor Champion 

Senior Vice-President, Environmental Affairs & Product Safety 

Georgia-Pacific LLC 

13 3 Peachtree Street, NE 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303 

Dear Mr. Champion: 

OFFICE OF 

Al R AND RADIATION 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency received three petitions for administrative 

reconsideration of the final rule, "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: 

Manufacture of Amino/Phenolic Resins" (79 FR 60898, October 8, 2014), which were submitted 

pursuant to section 307(d)(7)(B) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The petitioners are: (1) GeorgiaPacific LLC, (2) Sierra Club, and (3) Tembec BTLSR. 

Pursuant to CAA section 307(d)(7)(B), I grant reconsideration of the final rule on at least the 

following petitioners' claims: that the public was not afforded a reasonable opportunity to 

comment on the Maximum Achievable Control Technology floor analysis, supporting data and 

resulting emission standards for continuous process vents; and that the requirements associated 

with emissions from pressure relief devices should be reconsidered. 

We intend to issue a Federal Register notice initiating public review and comment on the issues 

for which we are granting reconsideration. We are continuing to review all issues raised in the 

petitions for reconsideration. 

If you have any questions regarding the reconsideration process, please contact Mr. Art Diem of 

my staff at (919) 541-1185. We thank you for your continued interest in this rule and look 

forward to hearing from you during the reconsideration process. 

Sincerely, 

Janet G. McCabe 

Acting Assistant Administrator 

Internet Address (URL) http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: Mr. Bill Wehrum, Counsel for Georgia-Pacific 

Mr. James Bennett, Plant Engineer, Tembec BTLSR 

Ms. Emma C. Cheuse, Counsel for Sierra Club, Earthjustice 

Ms. Martha Mann, Department of Justice, ENRD 

Ms. Sonja Rodman, Office of General Counsel, ARLO 

Mr. Mike Thrift, Office of General Counsel, ARLO 

Mr. Peter Tsirigotis, Office of Air and Radiation, OAQPS 

Ms. Penny Lassiter, Office of Air and Radiation, OAQPS 

Mr. Art Diem, Office of Air and Radiation, OAQPS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Image Sensing System, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James Murdakes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                     /s/ James Murdakes
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     James Murdakes
                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                     March 28, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 167 (Thursday, August 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23124]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Meeting

agency: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

date and time: Friday, September 5, 1997, 9:30 a.m.

place: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, N.W., Room 
540, Washington, DC 20425.

status:

Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Approval of Minutes of August 15, 1997 Meeting
III. Announcements
IV. Staff Director's Report
V. Advisory Committee Report Utah: ``Employment Discrimination in 
Utah''
VI. Response to Commissioners Comments on Illinois, Indiana and 
Michigan SAC Reports
VII. State Advisory Committee Appointments for Illinois and Wisconsin
VIII. Briefing on Regulatory Barriers Confronting Minority Business 
Entrepreneurs
IX. Equal Education Opportunity Reports
X. Future Agenda Items

contact person for further information: Barbara Brooks, Press and 
Communications (202) 376-8312.
Stephanie Y. Moore,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-23124 Filed 8-26-97; 3:06 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 167 (Thursday, August 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45687-45688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22892]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Special Emphasis Panel in Design 
Manufacturing and Industrial Innovation; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Design Manufacturing and 
Industrial Innovation (1194).
    Date and Time: September 15-16, 1997.
    Place: Room 580, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA and Critical Technologies Institute/RAND, 
1333 H St. NW., Washington, DC.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Paul J. Herer, Senior Advisor for Planning 
and Technology Evaluation, Office of the Assistant Director for 
Engineering, Room 505, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230, Tel: (703) 306-1303.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning the use, need for, and continued government support for 
the RADIUS database, which is administered by the Critical 
Technologies Institute of the RAND Corporation.

[[Page 45688]]

    Agenda: To site visit the RADIUS project and review and evaluate 
its request for additional funding.
    Reason for Closing: The activity being reviewed includes 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, and financial and personnel data. These 
matters are within exemptions (4) and (6) of 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: August 22, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-22892 Filed 8-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
# Korea’s Lee finds fame through contest

/ Published Jan. 12, 2017
CAMP CARROLL, Korea, 
Jenny Lee (이연주), a six-month local intern, has become a valuable member of the DLA Distribution Korea team.  She is a recent college graduate and was selected from a pool of candidates in the Army supported intern program.  
Lee works in the Safety and Environmental Office, and helps with training, inspections, translations, and administrative work.  At the December 2016 all hands safety meeting, she filled in as the translator during the presentations, giving our normal translator a break for the holidays. She helps with the administrative duties associated with drivers training and licensing.  She also verified all phone numbers for personnel at the center to help with the alert roster, worked closely to develop, and then translate the Job Hazard Analysis training package, and always maintains a positive and friendly attitude.  Her goal upon coming to work for DLA Distribution Korea was to help wherever we thought we could use her talents, and in return, she wanted to be able to enhance her written and oral communications skills in Korean and English.

She has left a lasting impression with all those she has worked with, but will most likely be remembered as the Shin Ramyun girl here at the distribution center.  As part of their 30-year anniversary celebration, Nongshim Shin Ramyun conducted an exhibition promotional event asking individuals to submit their names and a photo to be nominated as the Shin Ramyun 30-year anniversary selectee.  All Korean Nationals were invited to apply through the internet and through Korean news channels.  Lee submitted her name and photo and then quickly forgot about the exhibition.  Later, she was surprised when she received a box in the mail and opened it to find her name and picture on the 30th anniversary packages of Shin Ramyun.

Shin Ramyun is the most popular brand of instant noodles in South Korea, and is exported to over 80 countries around the world.  The brand is so popular that it is produced in the United States, South Korea, and China.  It is one of the top selling brands of instant noodles in the U.S., Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea, and China.  Since it begin in 1986, over 28 billion packages have been sold worldwide.  If we placed those packages end to end, they would stretch more than 100 times the distance from the Earth to the moon.  In 2016, Shin Ramyun was listed on the National Brand Consumption Index as the variety of instant noodle with the most brand awareness and most brand power.  The name Shin is from a Chinese character that means ‘spicy.’  Shin Ramyun is rapidly becoming a staple of every college student’s diet as it fills you up, but at a very affordable cost.

Lee discovering her photo on the box of Shin Ramyun forever changed how the employees of the distribution center see Jenny.  Prior to receiving the box, she was known as Jenny, the safety intern; now she goes by the title, Ms. Jenny Lee, the Shin Ramyun Model.
#### Daniel WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2017.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 22, 1977.

*136Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Frank B. Kessler, Asst. Public Defender, and James K. Green, Legal Intern, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Marsha G. Madorsky, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

DOWNEY, Judge.

While appellant was in jail in Lake County on a forgery charge, Orange County officials requested a “courtesy hold” on appellant because he had been implicated in a burglary in Orange County. Although no formal charge or detainer had been lodged against him, appellant filed a demand for speedy trial in the Circuit Court of Orange County. Subsequently an information was filed against appellant in Orange County and, after 60 days had passed from the filing of the information, appellant moved for a discharge. The trial court denied the motion for discharge and this appeal ensued.

We find from the record that appellant was a prisoner within the meaning of Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.191(b)(2) and thus the 60 day rule did not apply to him. In addition, there was no formal detainer lodged with Lake County. However, even if a formal detain-er had been lodged with Lake County, it would not have commenced the running of the speedy trial time. *See Eaddy v. State,*352 So.2d 98, Fla., 4th DCA Opinion issued October 18, 1977.

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence appealed from is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.