Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 165 / Tuesday, August 26, 1997 / Notices 45223

The Department shall determine, and

the Customs Service shall assess,

antidumping duties on all appropriate

entries. Individual differences between

export price and normal value may vary

from the percentages stated above. The

Department will issue appraisement

instructions directly to the Customs

Service.

Furthermore, the following deposit

requirements are in effect as of the date

of publication of the final results of this

administrative review (July 16, 1997) for

all shipments of PET film from the

Republic of Korea within the scope of

the order entered, or withdrawn from

warehouse, for consumption on or after

the publication date of the final results

of this administrative review (July 16,

1997), as provided by section 751(a)(1)

of the Tariff Act: (1) Because the

weighted-average dumping margins for

SKC and STC are de minimis, the cash

deposit rates for these companies will

be zero percent; (2) for previously

reviewed or investigated companies not

listed above, the rate will continue to be

the company-specific rate published for

the most recent period; (3) if the

exporter is not a firm covered in this

review, a prior review, or the original

less-than-fair-value (LTFV)

investigation, but the manufacturer is,

the cash deposit rate will be the rate

established for the most recent period

for the manufacturer of the

merchandise; and (4) for all other

producers and/or exporters of this

merchandise, the cash deposit rate will

be 21.50 percent, the ‘‘all others’’ rate

established in the remand

redetermination of the LTFV

investigation, as explained below. These

deposit requirements shall remain in

effect until publication of the final

results of the next administrative

review.

On May 20, 1996, pursuant to court

remand, the Department recalculated

the weighted-average dumping margins

for the LTFV investigation. As a result

of the recalculation, the Department

established an ‘‘all others’’ rate of 21.50

percent. Final Determination on

Remand Pursuant to Court Order, E.I.

Dupont de Nemours & Co., Inc. versus

United States, Court No. 91–07–00487,

Slip Op. 96–56 (March 20, 1996). On

February 5, 1997, the CIT affirmed the

Department’s remand redetermination

of the LTFV investigation. E.I. DuPont

De Nemours & Co., Inc., versus United

States, Court No. 91–07–00487, Slip Op.

97–17 (February 5, 1997). Accordingly,

21.50 percent is the ‘‘all others’’ rate

established in the LTFV investigation.

Pursuant to the CIT decisions in Floral

Trade Council versus United States, 822

F. Supp. 766 (CIT 1993) and Federal

Mogul Corporation versus United States,

822 F. Supp. 782 (CIT 19930, this ‘‘all

others’’ rate can only be changed

through an administrative review.

These amended final results of

administrative review and notice are in

accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the

Tariff Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1) and 19

CFR 353.28(c).

Dated: August 15, 1997.

Robert S. LaRussa,

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–22688 Filed 8–25–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Export Administration

Materials Technical Advisory

Committee; Notice of Open Meeting

A meeting of the Materials Technical

Advisory Committee will be held

September 26, 1997, 10:30 a.m., in the

Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room

1617M(2), 14th Street between

Constitution & Pennsylvania Avenues,

N.W., Washington, D.C. The Committee

advises the Office of the Assistant

Secretary for Export Administration

with respect to technical questions that

affect the level of export controls

applicable to advanced materials and

related technology.

Agenda

1. Opening remarks by the Chairman.

2. Presentation of papers or comments

by the public.

3. Discussion of the Chemical

Weapons Convention implementing

regulations.

The meeting will be open to the

public and a limited number of seats

will be available. To the extent that time

permits, members of the public may

present oral statements to the

Committee. Written statements may be

submitted at any time before or after the

meeting. However, to facilitate

distribution of public presentation

materials to the Committee members,

the Committee suggests that presenters

forward the public presentation

materials two weeks prior to the

meeting date to the following address:

Ms. Lee Ann Carpenter, OAS/EA MS:

3886C, Bureau of Export

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230.

For further information or copies of

the minutes, contact Lee Ann Carpenter

on (202) 482–2583.

Dated: August 21, 1997.

Lee Ann Carpenter,

Director, Technical Advisory Committee Unit.

[FR Doc. 97–22618 Filed 8–25–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–588–819]

Aspheric Ophthalmoscopy Lenses

From Japan, Revocation of the

Antidumping Duty Order

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Revocation of

Antidumping Duty Order.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

(the Department) is notifying the public

of its revocation of the antidumping

duty order on aspheric ophthalmoscopy

lenses from Japan because it is no longer

of any interest to domestic interested

parties.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 26, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack

Dulberger or Michael Panfeld, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230,

telephone (202) 482–5505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

The Department may revoke an

antidumping duty order if the Secretary

concludes that the duty order is no

longer of any interest to domestic

interested parties. We conclude that

there is no interest in an antidumping

duty order when no interested party has

requested an administrative review for

five consecutive review periods and

when no domestic interested party

objects to revocation (19 CFR

§ 353.25(d)(4)(iii)).

On April 7, 1997, the Department

published in the Federal Register (62

FR 16540) its notice of intent to revoke

the antidumping duty order on aspheric

ophthalmoscopy lenses from Japan

(April 15, 1992). Additionally, as

required by 19 CFR § 353.25(d)(4)(ii),

the Department served written notice of

its intent to revoke this antidumping

duty order on each domestic interested

party on the service list. Domestic

interested parties who might object to

the revocation were provided the

opportunity to submit their comments

not later than the last day of the

anniversary month.