T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GU L Z ARS I NG H, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 72820 A ge nc yN o. A 097- 111- 145 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 29, 2010 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , L E A V Y , an dG R A B E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G ul zar S i ng h, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f I nd i a, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oard of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rde ny i ng hi s m ot i on t o r e m and, and d is m is s in g h is ap p e a l f

r o m an im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g h is appl i cat i on for a sy l um and w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 

# FI LED JU L 19 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 72820 2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e m an d . R om er o-R uiz v . Mukasey , 5 3 8 F .3 d1 0 5 7 , 1 0 6 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) . W e re vi ew de no vo du e proces s c on t ent i on s and w e r evi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence f a c tu a l f in d in g s . W

akkaryv. H

older , 5 5 8 F .3 d1 0 4 9 , 1 0 5 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . W e d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. E ve n i f S i ngh ha d t i m e l yf

i l e d hi s a s y l um appl i c a t i on w i thi n one y e arof en try i n t o th e U n i t edS t at es, sub st an t i al ev i d en ce sup p o rt s th e ag en cy’ s ad v erse cred i b i l i ty d et erm i n at i o n b ecau se d i screp an ci es reg ard i n g S i n g h ’ s em p l o ym en tas a c o n s tab le p o lic e o f

f ic e rin h is a s y lu m ap p lic a tio n g o to th e h e art o f h is c la im . See D on v. G on zales , 4 7 6 F .3 d7 3 8 , 7 4 1 - 4 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) ( in c o n s is te n c ie s th a t g o to th e h e art o f

th e c la im f

r o m a s y lu m ap p lic a tio n s up p o rt an a d v e r s e c r e d ib ility de t e rm i na t i on) . I n the abs e nc e of c r e di bl e e vi de nc e , S i ngh ha s f a i l e d t o s how e lig ib ilityf

o ra s y lu m o rw ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l. Se e Fa ra h v . A s h c r o ft , 348 F . 3d 11 53 , 11 56 (9th C i r. 20 03 ). B e c aus e S i ngh’ s C A T c l a i m i s ba s e d on the t e s t i m onythe I Jf ound not c r e di bl e , and he poi nt s t o no othe re vi de nc e t o s how i ti s m or e l i ke l ythan nothe w o u ldb e to rtu r e dif

r e tu rn e dto I n d ia , h is C A T c la im f a ils . Se e id. a t1156- 57. W e d e n yS in g h ’s du e p r o c e s s c la im c h a lle n g in g th e B I A ’s d e n ia l o f h is m o tio n to r e m an db e c au s e th e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n an dS in g h f a ile dto07- 72820 3 d e m o n s tr a te p r e

ju d ic e . Se e La ta v . I

NS , 204 F . 3d 1241, 1246 ( 9th C i r . 2000) (r equi ri ng error and prej ud i ce for apet i t i on ert o p re vai l on a due process cl ai m ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.