alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Direct Response Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory Rotelli, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

\s\            , Gregory Rotelli, Gregory RotelliPresident and Principal Executive Officer September 12, 2003

----
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Charles A. STEWART.

No. 61504.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 31, 1978.

Lyall G. Shiell, Jr., New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Brian G. Meissner, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Cheddar Cheese Prices
A product of the National Agricultural Statistics Service, Agricultural Statistics Board, U.S. Department of Agriculture**Description:**
The report contains weekly weighted average prices received and volumesof sales of cheddar cheese based on a survey of manufacturers that sellcheese on a bulk, wholesale basis.  Prices and volumes represent 80 to85 percent of all bulk cheddar cheese sales. Data are reported for 40 lb.blocks, 640 lb. blocks, and 500 lb. barrels.  Regional data is publishedwhere possible. Weekly reports contain the most recent five weeks of data.**Cheddar Cheese Prices** ceased publication with the October2, 1998 report. This publication is continued by **DairyProducts Prices**

**
# L_2023030EN.01000601.xml

| 2.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 30/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 30/6

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/215

of 1 February 2023

correcting the Spanish language version of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1100 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in Turkey

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Spanish language version of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1100 (2) contains an error in recital 24, the second sentence and in Article 1(1), the second subparagraph, point (v) that alters the meaning of the provisions. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Spanish language version of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1100 (2) contains an error in recital 24, the second sentence and in Article 1(1), the second subparagraph, point (v) that alters the meaning of the provisions.

| (2) | The Spanish language version of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1100 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Spanish language version of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1100 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Implementing Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Trade Defence Instruments Committee delivered on 4 June 2021, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Implementing Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Trade Defence Instruments Committee delivered on 4 June 2021,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

(Does not concern the English language.)

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 February 2023.

For the Commission

The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 2.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 238, 6.7.2021, p. 32.

2

---
**Conservation Reserve Program Statistics, 1986-1989 (89031)**
Exhibit 10.12

FIRST AMENDMENT TO MINING LEASE



THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO MINING LEASE is made this 19th day of December, 2006 by and between GREG KUZMA and HEIDI KUZMA, husband and wife (Owner); and MIRANDA U.S.A., INC., a Nevada corporation (Lessee).

RECITALS

A.  Owner and Lessee have previously entered into a Mining Lease dated October 17, 2005 (the Lease) affecting the Angel Wings 1-27 and 30-32 unpatented lode mining claims situated in Elko County, Nevada.  Section 1.3 of the Lease sets forth a sliding scale of production royalties ranging from 2.0% to 4.0% of net smelter returns, depending on the price of gold.

B.

The parties have agreed to a royalty buydown, by which Lessee can purchase a portion of Owners reserved royalty.   The parties also wish to add additional Angel Wings claims to the Lease.

THEREFORE, the parties have agreed as follows:

1.

Royalty Buydown.  Owner and Lessee agree that the Lease shall be amended to add the following new Section 1.6:

1.6   Royalty Buydown.Owner hereby grants to Lessee the option to purchase up to two points of Owners reserved royalty on produc-tion, each point being equal to one percent (1%) of net smelter returns.  The purchase price shall be ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) per point.  At any time while this Agreement is in effect, Lessee may give written notice to Owner of its intention to purchase one or two points.  Within thirty (30) days thereafter, Lessee shall deliver a check for $1,000,000.00 or $2,000,000.00, as the case may be, to Owner, and Owner shall execute a Relinquishment of Royalty Interest reflecting the purchase of one or two points.



However, the parties agree that Owners reserved production royalty shall never drop below one percent (1%) of net smelter returns, regardless of the price of gold.  By way of example, suppose that Lessee has purchased two royalty points from Owner, and the price of gold then declines to $250.00.  In accordance with Section 1.3 of the Lease, Owners royalty would then be 2% of net smelter returns.  Despite the fact that Owners royalty is effectively zero (2% NSR less the two points previously purchased by Lessee), Lessee would pay Owner a 1% royalty on net smelter returns.



2.

Additions to Property.  Following execution of the Lease, Miranda has located fifty-seven additional claims in the name of Owner.  These claims are more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto.  These additional claims, together with the original Angel Wings 1-27 and 30-32 claims, shall constitute the Property subject to the Lease.

3.

Continuing Effect.  All other terms and conditions of the Lease shall continue in full force and effect, except as modified by this First Amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written.

_________________________________

GREG KUZMA



_________________________________

HEIDI KUZMA





MIRANDA U.S.A., INC., a Nevada

corporation



By:



KENNETH D. CUNNINGHAM,

President







miranda usa/7589

first amendment to mining lease (kuzma) (12-06)



-1-
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of PCS Edventures!.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), I, Anthony A. Maher, Chairman, CEO, and acting CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    Date:August 16, 2010By:/s/Anthony A. MaherCEO, President, Chairman of the Board of Directors and acting CFO
(principal executive officer)   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered May 27, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 22
- 00421
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF N.A.G.A., A CHILD On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. JC
- 20
- 00439
- W

O RDER Before the Court is appellants’ May 26, 2022 motion to extend time to file their jurisdictional letter brief

. Appellants assert the appellate record is incomplete , and they seek a fourteen

- day ext ension to allow for the filing and review of the supplemental record

. We GRANT the motion to the extent we ORDER Martha Grant, Official Court Reporter for the 304th Judicial District Court, and Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file, no later than June 1, 2022 , the requested supplemental reporter’s and clerk’s records, respectively. We further ORDER appellants to file their jurisdictional letter brief no later than June 9, 2022. Because this is anaccelerated appeal in a child protection case , we caution that further extension

requests will be disfavored. Appellants’ brief on the merits is suspended pending determination of our jurisdiction.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this letter to Ms. Grant, Ms. Pitre, and the parties

.

/s/ DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE
# Land and Maritime, Distribution leadership gather to discuss future efficiencies 

/ Published April 12, 2017
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
On Apr. 5, DLA Land and Maritime senior leadership met with DLA Distribution commander Army Brig. Gen. John Laskodi and key staff members to discuss the duo’s partnership and ways to create efficiencies benefitting the DLA enterprise.

Commander Navy Rear Adm. Michelle Skubic and deputy commander Jim McClaugherty, Senior Executive Service, joined Laskodi at DLA Distribution headquarters where he opened the discussion stating, "Our relationship is an important one and we'd like to tell you a little more about who we are, what we do and then talk about some of the things we work together on."

During the roundtable discussion, the group collaboratively considered a number of areas in which both organizations could sustain and improve their collaboration to best support the enterprise’s Army, Navy, and Marine customers.

A large part of the conversation included DLA Distribution’s in progress Campaign Plan, which essentially outlines where DLA Distribution plans to focus its efforts over the next 13 years in order to support the future requirements of the warfighter based on the future joint operating and logistics environment.  Specifically, the plan lays out the need for updated technologies within the Distribution system.  

Laskodi stressed during the visit that a big requirement for Distribution is defining what technology system requirements and tools are needed to automate current metrics reporting processes and implementing that technology throughout the enterprise.

Skubic agreed saying "Standardization will build the efficiencies. An IT system replacement will help get us to standardized metrics, leading to better support and better outcomes."

The group also discussed changes in where/how the two organizations are physically doing business and how the network is expanding, particularly through Navy Warehouse Transfer.  NWT was a 2015 initiative that resulted in the “As Is Where Is” transfer of several Navy-owned distribution sites to DLA Distribution to create process improvements and improved asset visibility of stock in storage for customers.

"We see our footprint growing. We're looking at smaller, customized locations to support our service customers," said Laskodi.

Another major topic of discussion was DLA Distribution’s 25th distribution center, DLA Distribution Expeditionary, a modular, scalable, deployable unit used to support military contingencies and disaster relief efforts.   Skubic suggested the organization consider looking at Navy ships as an option for executing deployments, regardless of the service or organization the unit is supporting.

In closing, to honor McClaugherty’s upcoming retirement, Laskodi publicly thanked the deputy for his years of service and support, presenting him with a memento of appreciation.  “Your departure will leave a tremendous expertise and leadership gap that won't be easily filled, but we wish you and your family all the best.”
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Development of genetic markersystems for use in research on the quantitative and molecular genetics ofPacific oysters ... annual report**
 
2004 | 2005 | 2006| 2007 | 2008
 
SuDoc Number:A 77.722/3:OY 8/
Item Number:0026-A-44 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000634836
 
November 20, 2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Annual Report and Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such Annual Report and Form 10-K.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      14,164,103
<SECURITIES>                                26,662,598
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,931,055
<ALLOWANCES>                                   987,000
<INVENTORY>                                 13,844,860
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            81,104,526
<PP&E>                                      43,352,991
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,058,401
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             142,465,088
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,430,484
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,770,232
<OTHER-SE>                                 133,153,608
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               142,465,088
<SALES>                                    103,525,263
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           103,525,263
<CGS>                                       35,734,178
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,734,178
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            32,729,798
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             40,370,160
<INCOME-TAX>                                14,767,121
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         25,603,039
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                25,603,039
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.895
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.884
        

</TABLE>
# Corpus Christi’s Atoe named Employee of the Quarter

/ Published Aug. 8, 2017
CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas, 
DLA Distribution Corpus Christi, Texas, employee Elyse Atoe has been selected as DLA Distribution Employee of the Quarter for third quarter, fiscal year 2017.

Atoe, who serves as Preservation, Packaging, Packing and Marking branch packer, was selected for her devotion to the packing mission, made evident through her consistent high performance which set the standard for PPP&M.

According to her supervisor, Troy Barker, Atoe is “an energetic, focused, and attentive packer, who utilizes her knowledge and skills to ensure mission success.  She ensures all material is expeditiously processed with no errors. She has stepped up and volunteered to take on additional duties without hesitation.”  

During this period, Atoe packed 53 hazardous assets valued at $1.65 million dollars, which, combined with non-hazardous assets, accounted for over 750 total assets packed, valued at nearly $21.7 million.

She also processed 397 Materiel Release Orders, valued at more than $7.6 million, for de-pack and customer delivery.  During this process, she ensured audit readiness standards were followed in accordance with Standard Operating Procedures, and ensured material matched documentation, performing at an accuracy rate of 100 percent.  

Processing more than 150 bulk asset maintenance returns inductions in DLA’s main warehousing system, Defense Standard System, Atoe performed the Kind, Count, and Condition process with a 100 percent accuracy rate.  She exceeded all production goals related to induction engineering standards.  

Additionally, Atoe organized the distribution center’s hazardous storage storerooms, ensuring 100 percent accountability and no denials during this period, and, as a result, all mission and non-mission MRO’s were able to be filled immediately.  “Her organizational skills and initiative ensured mission success,” said Barker.

Motivating co-workers with a sense of urgency while maintaining a positive attitude, Atoe is also known for her outstanding customer service.  “Ms. Atoe always gives the extra effort, goes the extra step, takes on the hardest tasks, and is well deserving of this recognition,” said Barker.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7633

WILLIAM T. MCGHEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED; ERNEST FULLWOOD; PERRY MARTIN; JERRY SPIVEY; NORA HARGROVE; FRANK DESILUA; JACK POISSON; JAMES LLEWELYN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-583-5-BO) Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 8, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William T. McGhee, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:William T. McGhee, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. McGhee v. North Carolina Prisoner Legal Servs., Inc. , No. CA-01-583-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# October is Cyber Security Awareness Month

/ Published Oct. 1, 2017
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
The campaign is to raise awareness about the importance of cybersecurity. The Internet touches almost all aspects of everyone's daily life, whether we realize it or not.

## Week 1

All members of the public can take some simple actions to protect themselves online and to recover in the event a cyber incident occurs. Read more.

## Week 2

Creating a culture of cybersecurity is critical for all organizations. Learn more about social engineering, phishing attacks and fun facts from DLA CERT. Read more.

## Week 3

Smart cities, connected devices, digitized records, as well as smart cars and homes have become a new reality.  Read more.

## Week 4

According to a study by the Center for Cyber Safety and Education, by 2022, there will be a shortage of 1.8 million information security workers.  Learn how to explore a career in the federal government.  Read more.

## Week 5

The essential systems that support our daily lives - such as electricity, financial institutions and transportation - are all dependent upon the Internet. Read more.
No. 9461.

#### Sylvester et al. *v.*Hoy.

(Decided May 8, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Jackson county.

*Messrs. McGillivray <& Armstrong*and *Mr. T. 8. Hogan,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. T. A. McFarland*and *Mr. E. H.*Willis, for defendant in error.

Judgment, affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael MANSO et al.

No. 60814.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1977.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ Denied: No error in the trial court’s ruling.

SANDERS, C. J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted. See LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 294.

*242SUMMERS, J.,

dissents from the denial. In my view the presence of the defendant at a preliminary examination is required. La.Code Crim.Proc. art. 294 and Comments.
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

** **

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that, in accordance with 18U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, in his capacity as an officer of HPL Technologies, Inc. that thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of HPLTechnologies, Inc.

 
|                         |                                   |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Date: February 14, 2003 |                                   |
|                         | /s/ THOMAS A. TOMASETTI                |   |
|                         |                                   |   |
|                         | Thomas Tomasetti                       |
|                         | President and Chief Executive  Officer |

 
|                         |                     |
|------------------------------|--------------------------|
| Date: February 14, 2003 |                     |
|                         | /s/ MICHAEL P. SCARPELLI |   |
|                         |                     |
|                         | Michael P. Scarpelli     |
|                         | Chief Financial Officer  |

 

39

----
#### Harvey H. FRENZEL v. Benjamin BOWEN et al.

No. 61564.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 24, 1978.

In re: Harvey H. Frenzel applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.