alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robert S. CRISP, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation, Respondent.

No. 76-2743.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 17, 1978.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Frank B. Kessler, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert L. Bogen, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus having been granted with full appellate review, the appealed order is

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, DAUKSCH and LETTS, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 13, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60784

Summary Calendar

MUHAMMAD TARIQ,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A78 565 762

--------------------

Before DeMOSS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Muhammad Tariq petitions for review of an order of the Board

of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen. Tariq

has abandoned the petition for review from the BIA’s dismissal of

his appeal from the denial of his application for asylum and

withholding of removal. 

Tariq contends that the BIA erred by requiring him to

support his motion to reopen with evidence that his application

for labor certification had been approved. He asserts that this

amounted to an improper adjudication of the adjustment of status
No. 05-60784

-2-

issue by the BIA and that the BIA’s failure to reopen the

proceedings and remand the matter to the immigration judge

deprived Tariq of his due process right to seek an adjustment of

status.

The denial of a motion to reopen is reviewed for abuse of

discretion. De Morales v. INS, 116 F.3d 145, 147 (5th Cir.

1997). A successful motion to reopen must establish a prima

facie case of eligibility for the underlying relief sought. 

See INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 104 (1988). 

Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1255(i), an alien physically present

in the United States may apply for an adjustment of status to

become a permanent resident if he is a beneficiary of an

application for a labor certification that was filed before April

30, 2001. The Attorney General may adjust the status of an alien

who has received a labor certification if “(A) the alien is

eligible to receive an immigrant visa and is admissible to the

United States for permanent residence; and (B) an immigrant visa

is immediately available to the alien at the time the application

is filed.” § 1255(i)(2). The filing of a labor certification

does not vest an alien with any right to relief from removal but

is merely one step in the “long and discretionary process” of

obtaining an adjustment of status under § 1255(i). Ahmed v.

Gonzales, 447 F.3d 433 438-39 (5th Cir. 2006).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in determining that

Tariq had not met his burden to make a prima facie showing that
No. 05-60784

-3-

he was eligible for relief under § 1255(i). Because such relief

is discretionary, Tariq also has failed to show any due process

violation. See Ahmed, 447 F.3d at 440. 

The petition for review is DENIED.
# C_2008061EN.01002001.xml

| 6.3.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/20

---

Corrigendum to the Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations

(Consolidated version)

(Consolidated version)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 334 of 30 December 2005
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 334 of 30 December 2005

(2008/C 61/13)

On page 9, Article 15, title:

for:

‘Exclusion of convoi’,

read:

‘Exclusion of renvoi’.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22407]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES

Meeting of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committees on Rules 
of Bankruptcy and Criminal Procedure

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States; Advisory Committee on 
Rules of Bankruptcy and Criminal Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of open hearings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committees on Rules of Bankruptcy and Criminal 
Procedure have proposed the following rules:

    Bankruptcy Rules--1017, 1019, 2002, 2003, 3020, 3021, 4001, 
4004, 4007, 6004, 6006, 7001, 7004, 7062, 9006, and 9014;
    Criminal Rules--6, 11, 24, 30, 54, and new Rule 32.2

    Public hearings will be held on the amendments to: Bankruptcy Rules 
in Washington, D.C. on January 30, 1998; and Criminal Rules in New 
Orleans, Louisiana on December 12, 1997.
    The Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice and 
Procedure submits these rules for public comment. All comments and 
suggestions with respect to them must be placed in the hands of the 
Secretary as soon as convenient and, in any event, no later than 
February 15, 1998.
    Anyone interested in testifying should write to Mr. Peter G. 
McCabe, Secretary, Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure, 
Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, D.C. 
20544, at least 30 days before the hearing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee 
Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, 
Washington, D.C. 20544, telephone (202) 273-1820.

    Dated: August 18, 1997.
John K. Rabiej,
Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.
[FR Doc. 97-22407 Filed 8-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-01-M
```
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1669 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Isoeicosane. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Isoeicosane. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON ISOEICOSANE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.39.14 Isoeicosane (CAS No. 

93685–79–1) (provided for 

in subheading 2710.19.90) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 
2 

•S 1669 IS

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Exhibit 4.1
                                                               CUSIP   042242107
                                  ARMITEC, INC.


              INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                                                               SEE REVERSE FOR
                                  COMMON STOCK               CERTAIN DEFINITIONS



                                    SPECIMAN


This
certifies
that







is the owner of


 FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF
                                  ARMITEC, INC.


(hereinafter  called  the  "Corporation"),  transferable  on  the  books  of the
Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney,  upon
surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed.  This certificate and the shares
represented hereby are issued and shall be held subject to all the provisions of
the Certificate of Incorporation  and the Bylaws of the Corporation,  as amended
(copies of which are on file at the  office of the  Transfer  Agent),  to all of
which  the  holder  of this  Certificate  by  acceptance  hereof  assents.  This
Certificate  is not valid unless  countersigned  and  registered by the Transfer
Agent and  Registrar.  Witness  the  facsmile  seal of the  Corporation  and the
facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.


DATE:


                            [CORPORATE SEAL OMITTED]



                               Countersigned:
PRESIDENT                                    SECURITIES TRANSFER CORPORATION
                                             P.O. Box 701629
                                             Dallas, TX 75370
                                          By:


SECRETARY                                    ___________________________________
                                             TRANSFER AGENT-AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
254 La. 18

#### John H. FREEMAN v. Earl HILL, Sheriff, Richland Parish, Louisiana.

No. 49852.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 13, 1969.

In re: John H. Freeman applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Application denied. On the showing made we find no basis for granting the relief prayed for.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

FERNANDO RAMON-XOLIO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-10014

D.C. No. 4:07-cr-00527-RCC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2010** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 

Fernando Ramon-Xolio appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 51-month

sentence for assault on a federal officer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(1) and

(b). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ramon-Xolio’s

counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion

to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the

FILED

DEC 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-10014

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 165 (Tuesday, August 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22731]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION ON CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION


Advisory Committee for the President's Commission on Critical 
Infrastructure Protection; Advisory Committee Meeting Notice: Change of 
Location

ACTION: Notice of open meeting: Change of location.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TIME AND DATE: 9 a.m.-6 p.m., Friday, September 5, 1997.
    This document announces the change of location of the September 5, 
1997, Advisory Committee Meeting, appearing in the August 21, 1997, 
Federal Register, Publication Number 62 FR, Page 44497. The meeting 
will now be held at the National Press Club, Ballroom, 529 14th Street, 
NW., (Corner of 14th and F Streets) Washington, DC 20045.
    Please refer to the original meeting notice published August 21, 
1997, 62 FR, Page 44497, for further information regarding the 
September 5, 1997, Advisory Committee Meeting.
James H. Kurtz,
Executive Secretariat, President's Commission on Critical 
Infrastructure Protection.
[FR Doc. 97-22731 Filed 8-22-97; 10:05 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-$$-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4788-4789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2309]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[ES-960-1910-00-4442, ES-048576; Group 158, Minnesota]


Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Minnesota

    The plat of the dependent resurvey of portions of the west and 
north boundaries, a portion of the subdivisional lines, and the 
subdivision of sections 6, 7, 8, 9, 16 and 33, Township 145 North, 
Range 38 West, Fifth Principal Meridian, Minnesota, will be officially 
filed in Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia at 7:30 a.m., on March 
10, 1997.
    The survey was requested by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
    All inquiries or protests concerning the technical aspects of the 
survey must be sent to the Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Eastern States, 
Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 
22153, prior to 7:30 a.m., March 10, 1997.

[[Page 4789]]

    Copies of the plat will be made available upon request and 
prepayment of the reproduction fee of $2.75 per copy.

    Dated: January 23, 1997.
Stephen G. Kopach,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 97-2309 Filed 1-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of PCS Edventures!.com , Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
Report"), We, Anthony A. Maher, President and CEO, and Shannon M. Wilson, CFO
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


Dated: 11/13/06                         /s/Anthony A. Maher
      ----------                        -------------------
                                        Anthony A. Maher
                                        President and CEO


Dated: 11/13/06                         /s/Shannon M. Wilson
      ----------                        ----------------------
                                        Shannon M. Wilson
                                        CFO
EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss.1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer of Medical Nutrition USA, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
the Company for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2006 ( the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


         April 24, 2006                /s/ FRANCIS A. NEWMAN
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Francis A. Newman
                                       Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          23,788
<SECURITIES>                                    23,923
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,224
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,177
<INVENTORY>                                     14,848
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,219
<PP&E>                                         160,372
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,210
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 241,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,907
<BONDS>                                         50,038
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           233
<OTHER-SE>                                     157,327
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   157,560
<SALES>                                        210,996
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               210,996
<CGS>                                          174,562
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  174,562
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,218
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 429
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,645
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,187
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,458
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,458
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46
<FN>
<F1>For Purposes of this Exhibit, Primary means Basic.
</FN>


</TABLE>
# Employee Spotlight: Tomas Hernandez

/ Published June 6, 2018
RICHMOND, VA, 
**Name:** Tomas R. Hernandez

**Organization:**DLA Aviation-Cherry Point

**Years of Service:** 2 years

**What is your job title, and what do you do, specifically?**

I am a customer support specialist. As a member of the Engine Cell, I help support the T-58, T-64, T-400, and F-402 engines here at Fleet Readiness Center-East. I assist the customer by providing accurate information on parts ordered and finding the most efficient way to help them accomplish their mission. 

**What kind(s) of training and education helps your work performance in your current role?**

I believe my 20-years serving in the Marine Corps, performing maintenance and working in logistics, prepared me for my current role as a CSS. In addition, I’m currently working towards completing my Bachelor of Science in logistics management, which has also helped me be successful in my career. 

**What aspect(s) of your current job gives you the most personal satisfaction? Why?**

I receive the most satisfaction/gratification when I can provide a solution for material needed by the customer when there has been an issue with it. Supporting the customer with a positive outcome is always a great satisfaction!

**If you could speak directly to the warfighters you support, what would you tell them?**

I would let them know they can always count on me, to provide them with 110 percent to help accomplish the mission. I have made it my career to provide excellence to the customer first and foremost, and I will not let them down.

**What was your first job?**

My first job was serving in the Marine Corps as a maintenance chief. 

**Where do you see yourself five years from now?**

I would like to be promoted within DLA, taking on more responsibility and helping make a difference within the organization. 

**What’s your biggest pet peeve?**

Mission accomplishment is my biggest pet peeve. I don’t like to see slackers! I am here to support the warfighter, they deserve my all in order for them to continue fighting for our freedom. When you slack on the job, you are neglecting support to our nation’s warfighters. 

**Who is the most influential person in your life, past or present?**

The most influential person in my life was my mother. Everything she did to raise me and my siblings was a great example of how a person should care and love for their children. Everything she showed me, has made me who I am today. 

**What is your proudest accomplishment?**

I have to say that my proudest accomplishment was serving 20 years in the Marine Corps helping to maintain the freedom that we enjoy so much. This has allowed me to raise my two boys with so much pride. They are an extension of me.

**What type of music do you most enjoy?**

Music is one of my passions, not only do I like to listen to it, but I also like to dance as well! I was born in the Caribbean and the music that I grew up listening to was Merengue, Salsa, and Bachata.
Order filed May 16, 2013

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-12-00353-CV

__________

IN THE INTEREST OF G.C. AND J.C., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Ector County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC2-2991-PC

O R D E R

In this accelerated parental-termination appeal, each parents’ appellate 

attorney has failed to file a brief. This court previously extended Appellants’ 

briefing deadline and informed Appellants by letter dated March 28, 2013, that 

their briefs were due to be filed on or before April 15, 2013, and that “no further 

extensions shall be filed.” Despite this court’s March 28 letter, neither Appellant 

filed a brief, but Appellant (J.C.) filed a motion for extension. This court then 

issued an order on May 2, 2013, in which we stated: 

Upon consideration of the importance of the rights at issue in 

this case, we grant in part the motion for extension. Appellants’ briefs 
2

are now due to be filed in this court on or before May 9, 2013. 

Appellee’s brief will be due for filing on or before May 29, 2013. 

The court considers this to be a serious matter in light of the Texas 

Supreme Court guidelines in cases of this nature. The court will not 

look upon further requests for extension with favor, and the court will 

not grant such requests except in cases of extreme necessity. 

Workload is not a case of extreme necessity. This case will be 

submitted on briefs on May 30, 2013. 

Subsequent to this court’s May 2 order expressing that further extensions were not

to be requested, each Appellant has filed in this court a motion for extension of 

time in which to file Appellant’s brief. As of today, neither Appellant has filed a 

brief. 

The parents’ attorneys, J. ROXANNE BLOUNT and KEVIN D. ACKER, 

are ORDERED to appear in person at 9:00 a.m. on Friday, June 7, 2013, in

the Commissioner’s Courtroom, Midland County Annex, 2110 North “A” 

Street (corner of “A” and Scharbauer Drive) in Midland, Texas, to explain to 

this court why they have continually failed to abide by this court’s filing deadlines. 

At that time, this court may also enter a scheduling order that is enforceable by 

contempt. The filing of a brief will not excuse the appearance.

PER CURIAM

May 16, 2013

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson, J.