alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CARPENTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL, and Pacific of New York Group, Petitioners, v. Harold E. LEWIS and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 38231.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 30, 1969.

William R. Alvin, Miami, for petitioners.

Richard A. Sicking of Kaplan, Dorsey & Sicking, Miami, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 24, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

*6Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorneys fees filed by respondent is granted in the amount of $250.00.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1476 

To suspend temporarily the duty on glyoxylic acid. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 22, 2005 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on glyoxylic acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GLYOXYLIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.04.91 Glyoxylic acid (CAS No. 

298–12–4) (provided for in 

subheading 2918.30.90) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 

’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•S 1476 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Motion for Rehearing Granted, Memorandum Opinion filed October 24, 2017

Withdrawn, Appeal Reinstated, and Order filed December 21 , 2017.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 17

- 00462

- CV

____________ ALI YAZDCHI , Appellant

V.

KENN ETH MINGLEDORFF AKA MINGLEDORFF LAW FIRM , Appellee

On Appeal from the 215th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014

- 66361



### ORDER

On October 24, 2017 , this court issued an opinion dismissing this appeal.
On November 8, 2017 , appel lant filed a motion for rehearing. The motion is GRANTED

. This court’s opinion filed October 24, 2017 , is WITHDRAWN , and our judgment of that date is VACATED. The appeal is ordered REINSTATED.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise.
# Reservist at Troop Support honored for 32 years of service

/ Published June 8, 2017
PHILADELPHIA, 

Friends, family and colleagues celebrated the 32-year career of an Army reservist at the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support during a retirement ceremony June 4.

Lt. Col. Timothy N. Holloway is a true example of what it means to be Army strong, DLA Troop Support Commander Army Brig. Gen. Charles Hamilton said. Hamilton officiated the ceremony and thanked Holloway for his dedicated leadership.

“You’ve been an example for all soldiers to emulate and follow,” Hamilton said. “You’ve really been a great man of commitment, having served with tenacity and a sense of great pride in the United States Army.”

Hamilton described Holloway’s assignment as a joint combat logistics officer at DLA as globally respected, and Holloway as a great asset to the agency. Hamilton presented Holloway with a Defense Meritorious Service Medal for distinguished service. 

As the Subsistence supply chain’s Army Reserve lead, Holloway reduced outstanding debts by nearly $14 million, and provided contingency and operational planning support to DLA, according to the award citation. 

Holloway served in several active and reserve duty assignments throughout his career. including platoon leader and transportation team chief. In his civilian career, he is the director of transportation at Lancaster Foods in Jessup, Maryland, where he manages the delivery of produce from Florida to Maine.

“I’ve had the privilege to meet a variety of talented soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines and civilians,” Holloway said. “Even though this chapter in my life is closing, a new one is beginning.”

Hamilton presented Holloway with certificates of retirement and appreciation from the president, a retired Army flag and an American flag. 

Hamilton also presented Holloway’s wife Kelly with the Commander’s Award for Outstanding Service and the Army’s spousal certificate of appreciation. Holloway’s wife, daughter and mother were then presented with flowers as a token of appreciation.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of State Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas F.
Goldrick, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


3/25/03                                     s/Thomas F. Goldrick, Jr.
-------                                     ----------------------------------
Date                                        Thomas F. Goldrick, Jr.,
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of State Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian K. Finneran,
Secretary/Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


3/25/03                                   s/Brian K. Finneran
-------                                   -------------------------------------
Date                                      Brian K. Finneran, Secretary/Treasurer
                                         (Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21482]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-440-000]


Northern Border Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

August 8, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 5, 1997, Northern Border Pipeline 
Company (Northern Border) tendered for filing to become part of 
Northern Border Pipeline Company's FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to become effective August 1, 
1997:

Eleventh Revised Sheet Number 156

    Northern Border states that the revised Rate Schedule IT-1 Maximum 
Rate is being filed in compliance with the Commission's order issued 
August 1, 1997 in Docket No. RP96-45-004. Northern Border proposes to 
decrease the Maximum Rate from 5.201 cents per 100 Dekatherm-Miles to 
3.744 cents per 100 Dekatherm-Miles.
    Northern Border states that the herein proposed changes do not 
result in a change in Northern Border's total revenue requirement.
    Northern Border states that copies of this filing have been sent to 
all of Northern Border's contracted shippers and applicable state 
regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Section 385.214 and Section 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21482 Filed 8-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### A. & P. Tea Co., Appellant, *v.*Phila. R. T. Co.

Argued October 5, 1933,

Before Keller, Cunr-ingham, Baldrige, . Stadtfeld, Parker and James, JJ.

*376
      *Robert G. Walden,*for appellant.

*H. Rook Goshorn*and with him *Bernard J. O'Connell*for appellee.

*377October 26, 1933:

Per Curiam,

The material and controlling facts in this case are sufficiently similar to those in Kilpatrick v. Phila. R. T. Co., 290. Pa. 288, to bring it within- the ruling in that ease, and on its authority the judgment is affirmed.
II 

Calendar No. 196 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1340 

[Report No. 109–125] 

To amend the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act to extend the 

date after which surplus funds in the wildlife restoration fund become 

available for apportionment. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 30, 2005 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself, Mr. JEFFORDS, and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

AUGUST 31, 2005 

Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of July 29, 2005, by Mr. 

INHOFE, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act 

to extend the date after which surplus funds in the 

wildlife restoration fund become available for apportionment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 1340 RS

1 SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF SURPLUS FUNDS IN WILD2 LIFE RESTORATION FUND. 

3 Section 3(b)(2)(C) of the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife 

4 Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 669b(b)(2)(C) is amended by 

5 striking ‘‘2006’’ and inserting ‘‘2016’’. 

Calendar No. 196 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1340 

[Report No. 109–125] 

A BILL 

To amend the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoraavailable for apportionment. funds in the wildlife restoration fund become tion Act to extend the date after which surplus 

AUGUST 31, 2005 

Reported without amendment
```

[110th Congress Public Law 421]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ421.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 4778]]

Public Law 110-421
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To amend title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 
  1968 to extend the authorization of the Bulletproof Vest Partnership 
 Grant Program through fiscal year 2012. <<NOTE: Oct. 15, 2008 -  [H.R. 
                                6045]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Bulletproof 
Vest Partnership Grant Act of 2008.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 42 USC 3711 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant 
Act of 2008''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR 
                    BULLETPROOF VEST PARTNERSHIP GRANT PROGRAM.

    Section 1001(a)(23) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3793(a)(23)) is amended by striking 
``2009'' and inserting ``2012''.

    Approved October 15, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6045:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            Sept. 25, 26, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 30, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 Date:     March 27, 2008
    /s/  Quock Q. FongName:
    Quock Q. FongTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
1MAGE SOFTWARE, INC.                                           Exhibit 11.1

CALCULATION OF PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1995, AND 1994
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      1996           1995          1994
                                  ---------       ----------    ---------

<S>                              <C>            <C>            <C>
NET INCOME(LOSS)                 $ (89,074)     $(1,313,724)   $  600,890
                                 ==========     ============   ==========

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING         2,054,632        1,911,731    1,767,014

   Add weighted average
      number of common stock
      equivalents (options)
      using the trading price             *                *       11,000
                                 ----------     ------------   ----------
                                                                         
   Total weighted average
      number of common shares
      outstanding used for 
      per share calculation       2,054,632        1,911,731    1,778,014
                                ===========      ===========   ==========

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS
   (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE      $    (0.04)      $    (0.69)   $     0.34
                                ===========      ===========   ==========

* Anti-dilutive

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2706

JAMES A. MURPHY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN H. DALTON, Secretary of the Navy,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.

(CA-97-322-A)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 13, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James A. Murphy, Appellant Pro Se. Major Thomas Mercer Ray, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James A. Murphy appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to the Secretary of the Navy and dismissing his

complaint challenging his involuntary discharge. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Murphy v. Dalton, No. CA-97-322-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 8, 1997).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Spectrum Realty, Inc.;2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting;
 5)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions);
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ William J. CardenWilliam J. CardenChief Executive Officer 25
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KELVIN BROWN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 407 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KELVIN BROWN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 408 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KELVIN BROWN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 409 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM[ 407 EAL 2021, 408 EAL 2021 and 409 EAL 2021 ]

- 2

AND NOW , this 8th day of March, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### Willie Pressley ROBINSON v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50202.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 15, 1978.

Scales & Scales, William B. Thompson, Jr., Jackson, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Billy L. Gore, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before INZER, P. J., and SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

Affirmed.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and ROBERTSON, BROOM, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
#### James Hooker, Respondent, *vs.*Atlantic & Pacific Railroad Company, Appellant.

1. *Justices’ courts*— Non-payment *of costs*— Appeal, *right of.*— Whore a motion to set aside a judgment by default before a justice of the peace has been overruled, the party has a right of appeal, notwithstanding his non-payment of costs.

2. *Justices’ courts*— Appeal—Dismissal—Judgment *on bond.*— Where an appeal from a justice of the peace is dismissed, the court has no authority to affirm *450the judgment of the justice and render judgment against the parties to the appeal bond.

*Appeal from Laclede Circuit Court.*

*J. N.*Litton, for Appellant,

cited: Beers vs. A. & P. R. R. Co., 55 Mo. 292 ; Palmer vs. K. C., St. Joe. & C. B. R. R., 57 Mo. 250 : Garnet vs. Rogers, 52 Mo. 145; Kinser vs. Shands, 52 Mo. 326.

Respondent not represented.

Hough, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This action originated before a justice of the peace, by whom a judgment was rendered by default against the defendant.

A motion was made to set aside this judgment, which was overruled by the justice, because the defendant refused to pay the costs which had accrued. The defendant thereupon appealed to the circuit court, where the plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that the motion to set aside the judgment by default was properly overruled by the justice, in consequence of the refusal of the defendant to pay the costs. This motion the court sustained, hut rendered a judgment affirming the judgment of the justice and against the defendant and its security in the appeal bond. From this judgment of the circuit court the defendant has appealed to this court.

No appeal can be taken from a judgment by default rendered by a justice of the peace, unless application shall have been made by the party aggrieved, to set the same aside, and such application shall have been refused. (Wagn. Stat. art. 9, § 2, Justice’s Courts.) Nor can a justice set aside a judgment by default, except uponpayment of all costs then accrued. (Wagn. Stat., Justices’ Courts, art. 6, § 17.)

But it has been distinctly decided by this court, that when the motion to set aside the default is overruled, no matter for what reason, there is a right of appeal. (Beers vs. A. & P. R. R., 55 Mo. 292; Palmer vs. K. C., St. Jo. & C. B. R. R., 57 Mo. 249.) Sixteen other cases, involving the same point, are reported as having been determined by this last case, and the whole ques*451tion was there fully investigated and carefully considered.. The circuit court erred, therefore, in dismissing the appeal, and for this error its judgment must be reversed.

It may be well to observe, in this connection, that when an appeal is dismissed the court has no authority to affirm the judgment of the justice and render judgment against the parties to the appeal bond.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Judge Wagner absent; the other judges concur.