alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Floyd W. Pickrell, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, and I, Bernard J. Pitz, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Floyd W. Pickrell, Jr.
|Floyd W. Pickrell, Jr.,   
|Chief Executive Officer   
|                          
|February 9, 2006          
|                          
|/s/ Bernard J. Pitz       
|Bernard J. Pitz,          
|Chief Financial Officer   



February 9, 2006



This certification accompanies this Report
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

Certification of President



I, Ramon Chimelis, president, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Big Sky Industries II, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: January 13, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President
#### Leon Charles BACKUS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2297.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 27, 1977.

Alvin E. Entin, Miami, Manuel W. James, Key West, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Margarita Equiroz and Jose Rodriguez, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Spataro v. State,*179 So.2d 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965); *Zicca v. State,*232 So.2d 414 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970); *Heineman v. State,*327 So.2d 898 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); *United States v. Aranda,*457 F.2d 761 (9th Cir. 1972); *United States v. Ramirez-Valdez,*468 F.2d 235 (9th Cir. 1972).
# Aerospace Energy supports NASA’s Parker Solar Probe

/ Published Aug. 27, 2018
CAPE CANAVERAL, Florida, 
The Aerospace Energy division of Defense Logistics Agency Energy provided the High Purity Hydrazine for NASA’s Parker Solar Probe mission which launched on a United Launch Alliance Delta IV Heavy Rocket from the Kennedy Space Center, Aug. 12.

On a journey to study the sun, the probe carried 178 pounds of HPH and the rocket carried almost 165 pounds of HPH in its upper stage.

“The HPH, a hypergolic propellant, will be used to help maneuver the spacecraft to within 3.83 million miles from the sun to trace how energy and heat move through the sun’s atmosphere and explore what accelerates the solar wind and solar energetic particles,” said Doug Smith, director of DLA Energy Aerospace Energy Supplier Operations.

According to NASA, the Parker Solar Probe will travel through the sun’s atmosphere, closer to the surface than any spacecraft before it, facing brutal heat and radiation conditions — and ultimately providing humanity with the closest-ever observations of a star.

As the Department of Defense Integrated Materiel Manager for space and space-related products since 2001, DLA Energy has provided fuel sources for a variety of Department of Defense, federal, commercial and research missions.

“The hard work and dedication of the Aerospace Energy team is once again playing an important mission support role,” Smith said. “Team members like Barbara Peterson, a contracting officer, work tirelessly to uphold the long-standing reputation we have for providing quality specialty fuels and propellants for spacecraft such as NASA’s Parker Solar Probe.”

“It’s exciting that the work we do and the products we provide contribute to the agency’s whole of government partners and NASA scientist’s ability to gather unprecedented information about the sun and future of our solar system,” he added.

Of the 92 products Aerospace Energy provides, 11 are specific to space missions: rocket propellant-1 and -2, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, helium, gaseous nitrogen, dinitrogen tetroxide, hydrazine, methane and isopropyl alcohol.

To watch the video of the rocket launch or learn more about the probe and its mission, visit NASA’s Parker Solar Probe webpage.
1 The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-4091

___________ Reginald A. Quinones, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. DaimlerChrysler Corporation, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: January 4, 2007 Filed: January 18, 2007

___________ Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Reginald A. Quinones appeals the district court’s 1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of his employment-discrimination action against his former employer, DaimlerChrysler Corporation. Upon de novo review, seeSpringdale Educ. Ass’n v. Springdale Sch. Dist. , 133 F.3d 649, 651 (8th Cir. 1998), we conclude that the district court’s dismissal was appropriate. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
PRIVATE LAW 106–9—NOV. 9, 2000

Private Law 106–9

106th Congress

An Act

For the private relief of Ruth Hairston by waiver of a filing deadline for appeal

from a ruling relating to her application for a survivor annuity.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That for purposes of a petition by Mrs. Ruth Hairston for review of the final

order issued October 31, 1995, by the Merit Systems Protection

Board with respect to its docket number SF–0831–95–0754–I–1,

the 30-day filing deadline in section 7703(b)(1) of title 5, United

States Code, is waived.

Approved November 9, 2000.

Nov. 9, 2000

[H.R. 660]
#### T. V. JONES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1386.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 13, 1977.

Pollack, Tunkey, Robbins *&*Leen, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals his conviction and sentence for the crime of second degree murder, in violation of Section 782.04(2), Florida Statutes (1975).

An information was filed against appellant charging him with second degree murder for the stabbing death of one Herbert Tyler, on December 15, 1975. Appellant pled not guilty and the cause proceeded to trial whereupon, at its conclusion, the jury returned a verdict of guilty. On July 9, 1976, the trial court adjudicated appellant guilty and sentenced him to fifteen (15) years imprisonment. This appeal follows.

Appellant’s sole contention on appeal is that the trial court erred in commenting upon the evidence in responding to an objection raised by appellant over the use of a hypothetical question posed by the State, which sought to determine the cause of the victim’s death. It is appellant’s contention that facts comprising the hypothetical question were not in evidence and in overruling appellant’s objection to the question, the court in fact lent undue credibility to the State’s case, prejudicing appellant’s trial.

*25The alleged erroneous comment was as follows:

> “I think the jury will have to rely upon its own recollection as to whether these facts in quotes are, in fact, what has been testified to.”

Initially, we are of the opinion that the above statement in no way prejudiced appellant’s trial. Furthermore, the record reveals that the facts contained in the State’s hypothetical question were established by competent testimony or evidence. *Autrey v. Carroll,*240 So.2d 474 (Fla.1970). *Steiger v. Massachusetts Casualty Insurance Company,*273 So.2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). As such, no abuse of discretion has been shown in allowing the question to be asked. *Seibels, Bruce & Company v. Giddings,*264 So.2d 103 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972).

Accordingly, appellant’s conviction and sentence are hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.
No. 00-7045.

#### Iglesias *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries VI, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 3, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries VI, Inc.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MFIC Corporation. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |  | By: | /s/IRWIN J. GRUVERMANIrwin J. Gruverman Chief Executive
Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
| |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**Certification**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of First Century Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that to such officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: March 17, 2006

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 andis not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
UNITED
STATES


SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington,
D.C. 20549





FORM
8-K


CURRENT
REPORT





Pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of
Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 19, 2008





GREATER
COMMUNITY BANCORP


(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Commission
File Number 000-14294


New
      Jersey
            22-2545165(State
      of Incorporation)
            (IRS
      Employer Identification No.)


55 Union
Boulevard


Totowa,
New Jersey 07512


(Address
of Principal Executive Offices and Zip Code)





(973)
942-1111


(Registrant's
Telephone Number)








Check the
appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
provisions:





(  )
            Written
      communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
      230.425)


(  )
            Soliciting
      material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
      240.14a-12)


(  )
            Pre-commencement
      communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
      240.14d-2(b))


(  )
            Pre-commencement
      communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange
      Act  (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))














Item
8.01  Other Events.





On June 19, 2008 the shareholders of
Greater Community Bancorp approved the merger of Greater Community Bancorp with
and into Valley National Bancorp.  In connection with the approval of
the merger, Greater Community Bancorp and Valley National Bancorp issued a joint
press release in the form filed as Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto and which is
herein incorporated by reference.








Item
9.01  Financial Statements and Exhibits.





(d)
Exhibits.  The following exhibit is being filed with this Report and
is attached hereto:





Exhibit
      No.
            Description of
      Exhibit99.1
            Joint
      press release of Greater Community Bancorp and Valley National Bancorp,
      dated June 19, 2008, announcing shareholder merger
    approval.














SIGNATURE





Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
duly authorized.








GREATER
      COMMUNITY BANCORPDate:
      June 20, 2008
            /s/
      Stephen J. MaugerStephen
      J. MaugerSenior
      Vice President, Treasurerand
      Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

________________________

No. ACM S32475

________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Mallory E. TOMPKINS

Airman First Class (E-3), U.S. Air Force, Appellant

________________________

Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary

Decided 28 March 2018

________________________

Military Judge: Ryan A. Hendricks. 

Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 2 months, 

forfeiture of $500.00 pay per month for 2 months, and reduction to E1. Sentence adjudged 18 May 2017 by SpCM convened at MacDill Air

Force Base, Florida. 

For Appellant: Major Patrick A. Clary, USAF.

For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph Kubler, USAF; Mary Ellen 

Payne, Esquire.

Before HARDING, SPERANZA, and HUYGEN, Appellate Military 

Judges.

________________________

This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as 

precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

________________________

PER CURIAM:

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no 

error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 

866(c). 
United States v. Tompkins, No. ACM S32475

2

Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 31.1
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Beacon Enterprise Solutions Group, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the
circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
   Date: August 16, 2010
    /s/ Bruce WidenerBruce WidenerPrincipal Executive Officer
----

----

| 1.  | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the LP. |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 5, 2009                                                                                          |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                               |   |   |
| /s/ Michael A. Reisner                                                                                             |   |   |
| Michael A. Reisner                                                                                                 |   |   |
| Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-PresidentICON Capital Corp.General Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight B L.P. |
II 

Calendar No. 35 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 134 

[Report No. 109–23] 

To adjust the boundary of Redwood National Park in the State of California. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2005 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself and Mrs. BOXER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

MARCH 9, 2005 

Reported by Mr. DOMENICI, without amendment 

A BILL 

To adjust the boundary of Redwood National Park in the 

State of California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Redwood National 

5 Park Boundary Adjustment Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•S 134 RS

1 SEC. 2. REDWOOD NATIONAL PARK BOUNDARY ADJUST2 MENT. 

3 Section 2(a) of the Act of Public Law 90–545 (16 

4 U.S.C. 79b(a)) is amended— 

5 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘(a) The 

6 area’’ and all that follows through the period at the 

7 end and inserting the following: ‘‘(a)(1) The Red8 wood National Park consists of the land generally 

9 depicted on the map entitled ‘Redwood National 

10 Park, Revised Boundary’, numbered 167/60502, and 

11 dated February, 2003.’’; 

12 (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) (as des13 ignated by paragraph (1)) the following: 

14 ‘‘(2) The map referred to in paragraph (1) shall be— 

15 ‘‘(A) on file and available for public inspection 

16 in the appropriate offices of the National Park Serv17 ice; and 

18 ‘‘(B) provided by the Secretary of the Interior 

19 to the appropriate officers of Del Norte and Hum20 boldt Counties, California.’’; and 

21 (3) in the second sentence— 

22 (A) by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and in23 serting the following: 

24 ‘‘(3) The Secretary;’’ and 

25 (B) by striking ‘‘one hundred and six thou26 sand acres’’ and inserting ‘‘133,000 acres’’. 

Calendar No. 35 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 134 

[Report No. 109–23] 

A BILL 

To adjust the boundary of Redwood National Park 

in the State of California. 

MARCH 9, 2005 

Reported without amendment