Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 24, 2012 / Proposed Rules 3415 

allowance for loan losses appropriate for 

credit exposures throughout the 

planning horizon. 

(b) Planning horizon. Each covered 

institution must use a planning horizon 

of at least nine quarters. 

(c) Controls and oversight of stress 

test processes. (1) Each covered 

institution must establish and maintain 

a system of controls, oversight, and 

documentation, including policies and 

procedures, designed to ensure that the 

stress test processes used by the covered 

institution satisfy the requirements in 

this part. These policies and procedures 

must, at a minimum, describe the 

covered institution’s stress test practices 

and methodologies, and processes for 

updating the covered institution’s stress 

test practices. 

(2) The board of directors of the 

covered institution shall approve and 

review the policies and procedures of 

the covered institution, as frequently as 

economic conditions or the condition of 

the institution may warrant, but no less 

than annually. The senior management 

of the covered institution shall establish 

and maintain a system of controls, 

oversight, and documentation designed 

to ensure that the stress test processes 

satisfy the requirements in this part. 

§ 46.7 Report to the Office of the 

Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal 

Reserve Board. 

On or before January 5, each covered 

institution shall report to the OCC and 

to the Board the results of the stress test 

in the time, manner and form specified 

by the OCC. 

§ 46.8 Publication. 

(a) Within ninety (90) days following 

the due date of the report required 

under section 46.7 of this part, a 

covered institution shall publish a 

summary of the results of its annual 

stress tests. The summary may be 

published on the covered institution’s 

Web site or in any other forum that is 

reasonably accessible to the public. A 

covered institution controlled by a bank 

holding company that is required to 

conduct an annual company-run stress 

test under [INSERT CITATION TO 12 

CFR PART 252 SUBPART G] will be 

deemed to have satisfied the publication 

requirement of this section when the 

bank holding company publicly 

discloses summary results of its annual 

stress test in satisfaction of [INSERT 

CITATION TO 12 CFR 252.148], unless 

the OCC determines that the disclosures 

at the holding company level do not 

adequately capture the potential impact 

of the scenarios on the capital of the 

covered institution. 

(b) Information to be disclosed in the 

summary. The information disclosed 

shall, at a minimum, include— 

(1) A description of the types of risks 

being included in the stress test; and 

(2) Estimates of aggregate losses, net 

income, and pro forma capital levels 

and capital ratios (including regulatory 

and any other capital ratios specified by 

the OCC) over the planning horizon, 

under each scenario. 

Dated: January 18, 2012. 

John Walsh, 

Acting Comptroller of the Currency. 

[FR Doc. 2012–1274 Filed 1–23–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–33–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2011–1386; Airspace 

Docket No. 11–ANE–11] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Proposed Modification, Revocation 

and Establishment of Air Traffic 

Service Routes; Windsor Locks Area; 

CT 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

modify four VOR Federal airways, 

revoke one VOR Federal airway, and 

establish three area navigation (RNAV) 

routes in the vicinity of Windsor Locks, 

CT. The FAA is proposing this action to 

adjust the airway route structure due to 

the planned decommissioning of the 

Bradley VHF omnirange/tactical air 

navigation (VORTAC) aid located on 

Bradley International Airport property, 

Windsor Locks, CT. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before March 9, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this 

proposal to the Docket Management 

Facility, U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

Washington, DC 20590–0001; telephone: 

(202) 366–9826. You must identify FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2011–1386 and 

Airspace Docket No. 11–ANE–11 at the 

beginning of your comments. You may 

also submit comments through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Gallant, Airspace, Regulations and ATC 

Procedures Group, Office of Airspace 

Services, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

Interested parties are invited to 

participate in this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments, as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA– 

2011–1386 and Airspace Docket No. 11– 

ANE–11) and be submitted in triplicate 

to the Docket Management Facility (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number). You may also submit 

comments through the Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

Commenters wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this action must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed, stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2011–1386 and 

Airspace Docket No. 11–ANE–11.’’ The 

postcard will be date/time stamped and 

returned to the commenter. 

All communications received on or 

before the specified closing date for 

comments will be considered before 

taking action on the proposed rule. The 

proposal contained in this action may 

be changed in light of comments 

received. All comments submitted will 

be available for examination in the 

public docket both before and after the 

closing date for comments. A report 

summarizing each substantive public 

contact with FAA personnel concerned 

with this rulemaking will be filed in the 

docket. 

Availability of NPRMs 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Recently published rulemaking 

documents can also be accessed through 

the FAA’s web page at http:// 

www.faa.gov, or the Federal Register’s 

web page at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/ 

fr/index.html. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
3416 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 24, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

phone number) between 9 a.m. and 

5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. An informal docket 

may also be examined during normal 

business hours at the office of the 

Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Room 210, 1701 

Columbia Ave., College Park, GA 30337. 

Persons interested in being placed on 

a mailing list for future NPRMs should 

contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking, 

(202) 267–9677, for a copy of Advisory 

Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking Distribution System, which 

describes the application procedure. 

Background 

The State of Connecticut requested 

the decommissioning and removal of 

the Bradley VORTAC located on 

Bradley International Airport property, 

Windsor Locks, CT. Plans are in place 

for taxiway expansion and cargo and 

industry development in the quadrant 

where the VORTAC is currently sited. 

There is no suitable site to relocate the 

VORTAC. The FAA conducted an 

aeronautical study of the proposal in 

2009 and issued a determination of nonobjection with the special provision that 

all instrument procedures that utilize 

the Bradley VORTAC be modified with 

minimal impact to the aviation 

community. This proposed action 

would modify the affected airways as 

well as establish new RNAV routes to 

provide continued navigation capability 

in the Winsor Locks, CT area. 

The Proposal 

The FAA is proposing an amendment 

to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR) part 71 to modify VOR Federal 

airways V–130, V–203, V–405 and V– 

419; remove V–205; and establish RNAV 

routes T–212, T–255, and T–300. These 

changes are required due to the planned 

decommissioning of the Bradley 

VORTAC in 2012. 

V–130 currently extends from the 

Albany, NY VORTAC, through the 

Bradley VORTAC, to the Martha’s 

Vineyard, MA, VOR/DME. The FAA 

would eliminate the segment that 

currently extends from the Albany, NY, 

VORTAC, through the Bradley VORTAC 

to the Norwich, CT VOR/DME. The 

modified V–130 would originate at the 

Norwich VOR/DME, then follow the 

existing route to the Martha’s Vineyard, 

MA, VOR/DME. 

V–203 would be extended to 

encompass the part of V–130 that is 

being removed as described above. 

V–203 currently extends between the 

Albany VORTAC and the Montreal, 

Canada, VOR/DME. The extension of 

V–203 would run southeast from the 

Albany VORTAC to the existing STELA 

intersection (formed by the Albany 

134°(T)/147°(M) radial and the Chester, 

MA, VOR/DME 266°(T)/279°(M) radial). 

At that point, flights could link with 

other VOR Federal airways. 

The FAA is proposing to remove 

V–205 that currently extends from the 

COATE intersection (8 NM northwest of 

the Sparta, NJ VORTAC) to the Putnam, 

CT, VOR/DME. There are other existing 

airways available that provide 

navigation to and from Putnam, CT. In 

addition, a proposed new RNAV route 

(T–212) would overlie part of V–205’s 

route and would terminate at Putnam. 

V–405 would be realigned to bypass 

the Bradley VORTAC and, instead, be 

routed through the Barnes, MA, 

VORTAC (located approximately 13 NM 

north of Bradley). The airway would 

then proceed through the Putnam, CT, 

VOR/DME to the Providence, RI, 

VORTAC and resume the currently 

published route to Martha’s Vineyard, 

MA. 

V–419 currently extending between 

Westminster, MD and Boston, MA, 

would be to extend between 

Westminster, MD, and the existing 

BRISS intersection (formed by the 

Carmel, NY VOR/DME 045°(T)/057°(M) 

radial and the Madison, CT 328°(T)/ 

341°(M) radial). The route segments 

between BRISS intersection and Boston 

would be eliminated. Alternative 

routing would be available using other 

existing airways and/or via the 

proposed new RNAV routes. 

The FAA is also proposing to 

establish three new RNAV routes, 

designated T–212, T–255 and T–300. T– 

212 would extend between the WEARD, 

NY, fix and the Putnam, CT, VOR/DME. 

T–212 would overlie V–205 (which 

would be removed). T–255 would 

extend between the NELIE, CT, 

waypoint (WP) and the Martha’s 

Vineyard, MA, VOR/DME. It would 

overlie that portion of V–405 that the 

FAA is proposing to remove from the 

route as described above. T–300 would 

extend between the Albany, NY, 

VORTAC and the Martha’s Vineyard, 

MA, VOR/DME. This route would 

overlie another portion of V–130 being 

removed. 

VOR Federal airways and Area 

Navigation Routes are published in 

paragraphs 6010(a) and 6011, 

respectively, of FAA Order 7400.9V, 

dated August 9, 2011 and effective 

September 15, 2011, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The routes listed in this document 

would be published subsequently in the 

Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. 

Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) 

Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of 

Transportation (DOT) Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; 

February 26, 1979); and (3) does not 

warrant preparation of a regulatory 

evaluation as the anticipated impact is 

so minimal. Since this is a routine 

matter that will only affect air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this proposed rule, when 

promulgated, will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. 

This rulemaking is promulgated 

under the authority described in subtitle 

VII, part A, subpart I, section 40103. 

Under that section, the FAA is charged 

with prescribing regulations to assign 

the use of the airspace necessary to 

ensure the safety of aircraft and the 

efficient use of airspace. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority as 

it modifies the route structure to 

maintain the safe and efficient flow of 

traffic in the northeast United States. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal will be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1E, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures,’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 24, 2012 / Proposed Rules 3417 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9V, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 9, 2011 and 

effective September 15, 2011, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6010 VOR Federal Airways 

* * * * * 

V–130 (Amended) 

From Norwich, CT; INT Norwich 114° and 

Martha’s Vineyard, MA, 267° radials; to 

Martha’s Vineyard. 

V–203 (Amended) 

From INT Chester, MA 266°T/279°M and 

Albany, NY 134°(T) 147°(M) radials; Albany; 

Saranac Lake, NY; Massena, NY; INT 

Massena 047° and Montreal, Canada 188° 

radials; Montreal. The airspace within 

Canada is excluded. 

V–205 [Removed] 

V–405 (Amended) 

From INT Pottstown, PA, 222° and 

Baltimore, MD, 034° radials; Pottstown; INT 

Pottstown 050° and Solberg, NJ, 264° radials; 

Solberg; INT Solberg 044° and Carmel, NY, 

243° radials; Carmel; INT Carmel 344° and 

Pawling, NY, 204° radials; Pawling; Barnes, 

MA; Putnam, CT; Providence, RI; INT 

Providence 151° and Martha’s Vineyard, MA, 

267° radials; to Martha’s Vineyard. 

V–419 [Amended] 

From Westminster, MD to Modena, PA; 

Solberg, NJ; INT Solberg 044° and Carmel, 

NY 243° radials; Carmel; to INT Carmel 

045°(T)/057°(M) and Madison, CT 328°(T)/ 

341°(M) radials. 

* * * * * 

Paragraph 6011 United States Area 

Navigation Routes 

* * * * * 

T–212 WEARD, NY to Putnam, CT (PUT) [New] 

WEARD, NY .................................................. Fix .................................................................. (Lat. 41°45′44′′ N., long. 74°31′30′′ W.) 

WEETS, NY ................................................... Fix .................................................................. (Lat. 41°51′27′′ N., long. 74°11′52′′ W.) 

TRESA, NY .................................................... Fix .................................................................. (Lat. 41°52′50′′ N., long. 73°49′07′′ W.) 

STUBY, CT .................................................... Fix .................................................................. (Lat. 41°54′08′′ N., long. 73°26′14′′ W.) 

VEERS, CT ..................................................... Fix .................................................................. (Lat. 41°54′38′′ N., long. 73°17′06′′ W.) 

RONGE, CT .................................................... Fix .................................................................. (Lat. 41°54′53′′ N., long. 73°12′21′′ W.) 

NELIE, CT ...................................................... WP ................................................................. (Lat. 41°56′28′′ N., long. 72°41′19′′ W.) 

DARTH, CT ................................................... Fix .................................................................. (Lat. 41°57′56′′ N., long. 72°16′21′′ W.) 

Putnam, CT (PUT) ......................................... VOR/DME ...................................................... (Lat. 41°57′20′′ N., long. 71°50′39′′ W.) 

T–255 NELIE, CT to Martha’s Vineyard, MA (MVY) [New] 

NELIE, CT ...................................................... WP ................................................................. (Lat. 41°56′28′′ N., long. 72°41′19′′ W.) 

BLATT, CT .................................................... Fix .................................................................. (Lat. 41°49′37′′ N., long. 72°00′55′′ W.) 

NOXSE, RI ..................................................... Fix .................................................................. (Lat. 41°46′46′′ N., long. 71°44′28′′ W.) 

Providence, RI (PVD) .................................... VORTAC ........................................................ (Lat. 41°43′28′′ N., long. 71°25′47′′ W.) 

FALMA, RI .................................................... Fix .................................................................. (Lat. 41°22′22′′ N., long. 71°10′16′′ W.) 

Martha’s Vineyard, MA (MVY) .................... VOR/DME ...................................................... (Lat. 41°23′46′′ N., long. 70°36′46′′ W.) 

T–300 Albany, NY (ALB) to Martha’s Vineyard, MA (MVY) [New] 

Albany, NY (ALB) ......................................... VORTAC ........................................................ (Lat. 42°44′50′′ N., long. 73°48′11′′ W.) 

CANAN, NY .................................................. Fix .................................................................. (Lat. 42°29′34′′ N., long. 73°26′48′′ W.) 

SHIGY, MA .................................................... Fix .................................................................. (Lat. 42°23′58′′ N., long. 73°19′01′′ W.) 

STELA, MA ................................................... Fix .................................................................. (Lat. 42°16′53′′ N., long. 73°09′14′′ W.) 

MOLDS, MA .................................................. Fix .................................................................. (Lat. 42°12′31′′ N., long. 73°03′13′′ W.) 

TOMES, MA .................................................. Fix .................................................................. (Lat. 42°08′43′′ N., long. 72°58′01′′ W.) 

COBOL, MA .................................................. Fix .................................................................. (Lat. 42°05′13′′ N., long. 72°53′14′′ W.) 

NELIE, CT ...................................................... WP ................................................................. (Lat. 41°56′28′′ N., long. 72°41′19′′ W.) 

WIPOR, CT .................................................... Fix .................................................................. (Lat. 41°39′23′′ N., long. 72°10′38′′ W.) 

Norwich, CT (ORW) ...................................... VOR/DME ...................................................... (Lat. 41°33′23′′ N., long. 72°59′58′′ W.) 

LAFAY, RI ..................................................... Fix .................................................................. (Lat. 41°27′45′′ N., long. 71°43′16′′ W.) 

MINNK, RI ..................................................... Fix .................................................................. (Lat. 41°21′41′′ N., long. 71°25′27′′ W.) 

FALMA, RI .................................................... Fix .................................................................. (Lat. 41°22′22′′ N., long. 71°10′16′′ W.) 

Martha’s Vineyard, MA (MVY) .................... VOR/DME ...................................................... (Lat. 41°23′46′′ N., long. 70°36′46′′ W.) 

Issued in Washington, DC, on January 17, 

2012. 

Gary A. Norek, 

Acting Manager, Airspace, Regulations and 

ATC Procedures Group. 

[FR Doc. 2012–1395 Filed 1–23–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R01–OAR–2012–0008; A–1–FRL– 

9621–4] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Massachusetts; Determination of 

Attainment of the One-Hour Ozone 

Standard for the Springfield (Western 

Massachusetts) Nonattainment Area 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to 

determine that the Springfield (Western 

Massachusetts), serious one-hour ozone 

nonattainment area did not meet the 

applicable deadline of December 31, 

2003 for attaining the one-hour National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) 

for ozone. This proposed determination 

is based upon complete, certified, 

quality-assured ambient air quality 

monitoring data for the 2001–2003 

monitoring period showing that the area 

had an expected ozone exceedance rate 

above the level of the now revoked onehour ozone NAAQS during that period. 

Separate from and independent of this 

proposed determination, EPA is also 

proposing to determine that the 

Springfield (Western Massachusetts) 

serious one-hour ozone nonattainment 

area currently attains the now revoked 

one-hour NAAQS for ozone, based upon 

complete, quality-assured, certified 

ambient air monitoring data for the 

2007–2009 and 2008–2010 monitoring 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS