alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DSCC's food drive has a can-do attitude

/ Published Aug. 21, 2017
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
 The Defense Supply Center Columbus hosted an art competition that doubled as a food drive Aug. 3 – 9.

DSCC participates in the Feds Feed Families campaign every summer in order to provide food to the Mid-Ohio Food Bank during a period of time when donations are often low. *(Donations accepted through Aug. 31)*

“Even as the economy grows stronger, there are still too many people struggling to put food on the table. Our goal is to assist as many families within the community as possible,” said  DLA Land and Maritime Commander and DSCC Navy Rear Adm. Michelle Skubic. 

In addition to the FFF drop-off locations, the can art project known as “The Build” is another way associates give back to the community while having fun.

The event was established by DFAS co-coordinators Daniel Faltermaier and Misty Wyatt in 2014.

This year marked the second annual competition between associates at DLA Land and Maritime and the Defense Finance and Accounting Service.

“The goal of the build competition was to generate additional food donations to benefit the Mid-Ohio Food Bank through our FFF campaign. With associates participating in the can building contest and others coming in to vote for the structures, we were able to generate thousands more in donations to the cause,” said Kristin Molinaro, DLA Land and Maritime FFF coordinator.

This year, 11 teams participated in the competition resulting in structures built with over 3,000 pounds of food donations.

A change to this year’s Build was the judging.  All associates were encouraged to participate and could exchange non-perishable items for tickets to cast their vote for the best in three categories: customer spotlight, American landmark and most creative. 

“This was a great way to support the cause and increase food donations, making a significant contribution to the overall campaign,” Wyatt said.

The voting resulted in an additional 2,209 pounds of food contributions for the Mid-Ohio Food Bank.

Overall, the competition raised 5,499 pounds in food donations to assist in Ohio’s fight against hunger.

“We were grateful for everyone that came out and supported the Build event from the teams that constructed the art to the associates that voted. We saw a lot of creativity in the structures and appreciated all the support for the campaign,” Molinaro said.

### IMPORTANT REMINDER

The FFF campaign has been extended through Aug. 31. 

Associates can bring non-perishable food items and place them into designated collection boxes located throughout work areas or bring them directly to the food donation truck in front of building 20 in the north overflow lot near the corner of 17th and Pershing Ave. Collection times are Wednesdays from 6 – 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. – 1 p.m. during the campaign.

### 2017 Build
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 26, 2010 

s0719 

Order 

 

July 26, 2010 

140896 

STACEY RILEY, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140896 

 COA: 290510 

 Genesee CC: 08-090154-CL 

ROBERT ENNIS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 25, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.39



                                                               December 31, 1999

Irwin J. Gruverman
16 Tanglewood Road
Needham, MA 02194

Dear Mr. Gruverman:

This will confirm our Agreement concerning your compensation as Chairman and CEO
of MFIC.

Subject to approval by the Board, we will pay you at a base rate of $95,000 per
year, beginning January 1,2000. You will participate in a bonus pool, if any,
for management employees. You agree that MFIC will withhold money from your
compensation to pay appropriate taxes. You will be included in MFIC's insurance
and medical programs as in past years, at no cost to you, as part of your
compensation.


MFIC CORPORATION


/s/ Irwin Gruverman                          /s/ Irwin Gruverman
------------------------------               ----------------------------------
Irwin Gruverman, CEO, Chairman               Irwin Gruverman, for myself
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          27,465
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  271,312
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     65,178
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               502,038
<PP&E>                                         416,398
<DEPRECIATION>                                 362,411
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,704,118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           90,587
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     1,472,621
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    159,244
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,613,531
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,704,118
<SALES>                                        955,246
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               955,246
<CGS>                                          215,997
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,236,408
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 738
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (272,109)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (125,200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (272,109)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (146,909)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.09)
#### Eduvijes HERNANDEZ, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Renan E. DELGADO, Leroy’s Crane Service, Inc., etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 77-1049.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 18, 1978.

Rehearing Denied May 19, 1978.

Robert F. Weiner, Miami, for appellants.

Carey, Dwyer, Cole, Selwood & Bernard and Steven R..Berger, Miami, for appellees.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

*69PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final summary judgment for the defendant Renan E. Delgado in a wrongful death action by an employee of Machine Construction Company. The summary judgment was apparently entered under the provisions of Section 440.10, Florida Statutes (1975), although the defense was not pleaded nor does the judgment so specify.

The scanty record does not clarify the relationship of the parties. Defendant Delgado states in his brief that the owner of the project was West Palmetto Land Corporation. The record reveals that Delgado was an officer and one of the principals of West Palmetto. Delgado says that he was the general contractor but that he employed a contractor, Machín Construction Company, to do all the work. The plaintiff was an employee of Machín. The injury was allegedly caused by the negligence of another defendant, Leroy’s Crane Service. The evidence is conflicting on the contractual relationship of the crane service to Delgado or Machín.

We hold that summary final judgment was improperly entered on this record. The applicability of the exclusion in Section 440.10, Florida Statutes (1975), can be determined only when the status of the defendant Delgado is fully established on the record. See *Little v. Jim Santi, Inc.,*334 So.2d 150 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); and *Kemper v. First National Bank of Dayton, Ohio,*277 So.2d 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).

Reversed and remanded.
# San Joaquin graduates its leaders in High Performance Leadership

/ Published Nov. 23, 2016
TRACY, California, 

DLA Distribution San Joaquin, Calif., held a graduation ceremony for 106 graduates for the Foundations of High Performing Leadership training.  All managers, supervisors and American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) Local 1546 leaders attended the two-week session.

San Joaquin’s commander, Marine Col. Andre Harrell, kicked off the event prior to DLA Distribution’s deputy commander Twila Gonzales, Senior Executive Service, speaking with the class and handing out the completion certificates.

Harrell was pleased with the HPL training. “I want to thank the instructors for doing a phenomenal job. This training will improve our relationships with the warfighters, first responders, and, most importantly, our DLA employees.  The tools provided were very instructive and we are going to institutionalize these methods to create a thinking, learning, problem solving, productive, effective, and results-oriented climate and culture for Team San Joaquin.” 

He also mentioned that inviting the AFGE Local 1546 leadership was crucial to recognize the partnership between managers and the union. San Joaquin was the first location to incorporate the union in the training.

“I appreciate you going through the HPL course,” said Gonzales said to the graduates. “I am going to hold you accountable to take what you have learned and apply it. The workforce deserves it and deserves the best leadership you can provide. If the workforce can see the benefits of these two weeks improving our leadership culture than we hit a home run.”

The course was well received by all the attendees. All agreed that they now have more techniques to put into their leadership toolboxes. Interacting with real life scenarios helped them to see both sides of a situation. 

“Taking a real life situation and going through the process is helpful. It gives us the opportunity to [practice] a real-life event and find out what went well or what we could have done better,” said Ted Hackney, Receiving Division deputy.

Damiana Maggio, AFGE Local 1546 president, provided the union perspective to the training. “As leaders, we have to believe we are a world-class organization and have to “walk the walk” and “talk the talk.” We must put on our game face and express to the workforce that we are a world-class organization and the employees will believe it.”

Having the union involved was imperative because it gave managers and supervisors the opportunity to see both sides of employee scenarios. Transparency and open communication is key. 

HPL training includes four focus areas: setting the direction, job relations, job instruction and quality control.  The course included hands-on training, role playing and incorporates real life scenario discussions.
#### COLONIAL PENN INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Joan B. CASTILLO et al., Appellees.

No. 78-552.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 15, 1978.

*89Blackwell, Walker, Gray, Powers, Flick & Hoehl and Bradford Swing, Miami, for appellant.

Corlett, Merritt, Killian & Sikes, Yogler & Postman, Greene & Cooper and Marc Cooper, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The question on this appeal is whether including the following exclusion in an automobile liability policy is void as contrary to public policy of the State of Florida:

> ******

> “Exclusions: This policy does not apply: ******

> “Under the Liability Coverage * * * ******

> “(h) to any automobile or trailer while maintained or used by any person while such person is employed or otherwise engaged in the automobile business, but this exclusion does not apply to the mainte--nance or use of an owned automobile (1) by the named insured or a relative, or (2) by any other insured in an automobile business in which the named insured has an interest as proprietor or partner;”

> ******

We hold that it is not and reverse, the trial court’s final summary judgment so holding. See: *Schaffer v. Government Employees Insurance Company,*280 So.2d 504 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973); *Hodge v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company,*339 So.2d 279 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970); Compare: *Reid v. State Farm & Casualty Company,*352 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 1977).

The cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.
### Acid precipitation; an annotated bibliography

By: Denise A. WiltshireMargaret L. Evans

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir923

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2300

FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF

PENNSYLVANIA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA94-1541-S)

Argued: June 5, 1997 Decided: July 18, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ARGUED: Lauri Elizabeth Cleary, LERCH, EARLY & BREWER, CHARTERED,

Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellant. Anthony Linn Meagher, PIPER &

MARBURY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Stanley J.

Reed, LERCH, EARLY & BREWER, CHARTERED, Bethesda, Maryland, for

Appellant. Charles P. Scheeler, PIPER & MARBURY, Baltimore, Maryland; Thomas A. Doyle, William M. Sneed, BAKER & MCKENZIE, Chicago,

Illinois; Susan E. Woods, CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE CO., Chicago,

Illinois, for Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

When this case was on appeal the first time, we affirmed the

dismissal of Fidelity's claims against Chicago Title for conversion

and unjust enrichment, but we remanded for further proceedings on

Fidelity's claims for breach of fiduciary duty and civil conspiracy. See Fidelity Nat'l Title Ins. Co. v. Chicago Title Ins. Co.,

No. 94-2308 (4th Cir. Aug. 4, 1995). On remand the district court,

after allowing further discovery, granted Chicago Title's separate

motions for summary judgment on the two remaining claims. Fidelity

appeals from the judgment order entered August 13, 1996. After

considering the joint appendix, the briefs, and the arguments of

counsel, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's

two opinions. See Fidelity Nat'l Title Ins. Co. v. Chicago Title

Ins. Co., Civil No. S-94-1541 (D. Md. Apr. 22, 1996), and Fidelity

Nat'l Title Ins. Co. v. Chicago Title Ins. Co., Civil No. S-94-1541

(D. Md. Aug. 13, 1996).

AFFIRMED
# C_2023064EN.01001501.xml

| 21.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/15

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 14 February 2023

appointing one alternate member of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for Italy

(2023/C 64/05)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (1), and in particular Articles 23 and 24 thereof,

Having regard to the lists of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of Member States,

Whereas:

| (1) | By means of its Decisions of 20 September 2022 (2) and 25 October 2022 (3), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for the period from 25 September 2022 to 24 September 2024. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By means of its Decisions of 20 September 2022 (2) and 25 October 2022 (3), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for the period from 25 September 2022 to 24 September 2024.

| (2) | The government of Italy has submitted one nomination for a post to be filled, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The government of Italy has submitted one nomination for a post to be filled,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed as alternate member of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for the period ending on 24 September 2024:

| I. | GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES







  Country | Members | Alternates |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Italy | | Mr Niccolò FRANGIONE |

I.

GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES

Country

Members

Alternates

Italy

Mr Niccolò FRANGIONE

Article 2

The members and alternate members not yet nominated will be appointed by the Council at a later date.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 14 February 2023.

For the Council

The President

E. SVANTESSON

---

(1)  OJ L 141, 27.5.2011, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Decision of 20 September 2022 appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers (OJ C 393, 13.10.2022, p. 5).

2

(3)  Council Decision of 25 October 2022 appointing members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for Denmark, Germany, Greece, Croatia, Italy, Cyprus, Luxembourg, Malta and Portugal (OJ C 481, 19.12.2022, p. 1).

3

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-21110 Conference Calendar

GERRARDO CARRILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus J.A. DESANTO, Houston Police Department; CLARENCE BRADFORD, Police Chief; CITY OF HOUSTON; DAVID C. ZAHARIS; JOHN A. JACKSON, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CV-4023

-------------------- August 21, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Gerrardo Carrillo moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion for a three-judge panel and the lack of a neutral judge. See F ED . R. A PP . P. 24(a)(5). Because Carrillo has not shown that he will present a nonfrivolous issue, his motion to proceed IFP is DENIED. See Carson v. Polley , 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982) (movant must show that he is a pauper and that he will present a nonfrivolous issue on appeal). In addition, theNo. 01-21110 -2- instant appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous; accordingly, it is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. MOTION TO PROCEED IFP DENIED; ALL OTHER PENDING MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 158 (Friday, August 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21679]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-508 and 50-509]


Washington Nuclear Units 3 and 5 Closing of Local Public Document 
Room

    Notice is hereby given that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) 
is closing the local public document room (LPDR) for records pertaining 
to the Washington Public Power Supply System's Washington Nuclear Units 
3 and 5 (WPPSS) located at the W.H. Abel Memorial Library, Montesano, 
Washington, effective August 15, 1997.
    The W.H. Abel Memorial Library has served as the LPDR for WPPSS 
Units 3 and 5 for 23 years. In a letter dated May 28, 1997, the 
community librarian officially informed the NRC that they no longer 
wish to serve as the LPDR. NRC has made the decision to officially 
close the WPPSS Units 3 and 5 LPDR because none of the libraries in the 
vicinity of the Satsop, Washington site are interested in maintaining 
the document collection, no facility was ever constructed on the site, 
and there has been no demonstrated local public interest in the LPDR 
materials for a number of years. Therefore, effective August 15, 1997, 
the LPDR will be closed.
    Persons now interested in information pertaining to this facility 
or any other NRC activity may contact the NRC Public Document Room by 
calling toll-free 1-800-397-4209 or writing to NRC Public Document 
Room, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day of August, 1997.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Russell A. Powell,
Chief, Freedom of Information/Local Public Document Room Branch, Office 
of Information Resources Management.
[FR Doc. 97-21679 Filed 8-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P