alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Janie Bell WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2324.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 14, 1978.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Jerry L. Schwarz, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahasse, and Basil S. Diamond, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

*188DAUKSCH, Judge.

Appellant was charged with murder in the First Degree and convicted of aggravated assault. She was sentenced to the penitentiary for an indeterminate period from six months to fifteen years. Although she has not appealed her sentence we must reverse it because it is clearly error. The maximum sentence under Section 784.021, Florida Statutes (1975) Aggravated Assault, is five years because it is a felony in the third degree. Section 775.082 3(d) provides a maximum of five years for felonies of the third degree. Lest the ap-pellee come beckoning that the “enhanced penalty statute”, Section 775.087(l)(c) applies since a weapon was used, we say it does not apply because aggravated assault is an assault with a weapon and that statute specifically excludes “a felony in which the use of a weapon or firearm is an essential element . . .” The crime of aggravated assault is already an enhanced penalty statute. It makes the penalty greater than an assault, Section 784.011, Florida Statutes (1975), if a weapon is used or a felony is intended. We do not reach the question as to whether an enhancement of the penalty is available if the accused is convicted of an aggravated assault by assaulting with the intent to commit a felony and a weapon is used. This case is not the proper case to do so because the verdict of the jury was “guilty of aggravated assault with a weapon” and the judgment on the verdict reads the same. See *Butler v. State,*343 So.2d 93 (Fla. 3 DCA 1977).

The judgment is affirmed and the sentence is reversed. The cause is remanded for proper sentencing in accordance with this opinion, for a period no longer than five years.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, J., and CRAWFORD, GRADY L., Associate Judge, concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 167 (Thursday, August 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22870]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
(CO-930-1920-00-4357; COC-61013)


Proposed Withdrawal; Opportunity for Public Meeting; Colorado

August 18, 1997.
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy proposes to withdraw 
approximately 209.2 acres of public land for 5 years to protect the 
construction area of the permanent disposal site near Maybelle, 
Colorado. This order closes this land for up to two years from 
operation of the public land laws, including the mining and the mineral 
leasing laws.

DATES: Comments on this proposed withdrawal or requests for public 
meeting must be received on or before November 26, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Comments and requests for a meeting should be sent to the 
Colorado State Director, BLM, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, 
Colorado 80215-7093.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris E. Chelius, 303-239-3706.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 18, 1997, the Department of Energy 
filed an application to withdraw the following described public lands 
from settlement, sale, location or entry under the general land laws, 
including the mining laws and the mineral leasing laws:

T. 7 N., R. 94 W.,
    Sec. 19, Lots 9, 11, 13, and 15, and E\1/2\NE\1/4\.

    The area described contains 209.20 acres of public land in 
Moffat County.

    The purpose of this withdrawal is to protect the Maybelle Uranium 
Mill Tailings construction site. For a period of 90 days from the date 
of publication of this notice, all parties who wish to submit comments, 
suggestions, or objections, in connection with this proposed 
withdrawal, may present their views in writing to the Colorado State 
Director. If the authorized officer determines that a public meeting 
should be held, the meeting will be scheduled and conducted in 
accordance with 43 CFR 2310.3-1(c)(2).
    This application will be processed in accordance with the 
regulations set forth in 43 CFR Part 2310.
    For a period of two years from the date of publication in the 
Federal Register, this land will be segregated from the mining laws as 
specified above unless the application is denied or cancelled or the 
withdrawal is approved prior to that date. During this period the 
Bureau of Land Management, in conjunction with the Department of 
Energy, will continue to manage these lands.
Jenny L. Saunders,
Realty Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-22870 Filed 8-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-P
#### DIXIE PIPELINE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John A. BROUSSARD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 2766.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Sept. 16, 1969.

Dissenting Opinion Sept. 19, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 17, 1969.

Writ Refused Jan. 9, 1970.

J. Barry Mouton, Lafayette, for defendant-appellant.

*14John V. Parker, Baton Rouge, Andrew J. S. Jumonville, of Davidson, Meaux, Onebane & Donohoe, Lafayette, for plaintiff-appellant.

Before FRUGÉ, HOOD and MILLER, JJ.

MILLER, Judge.

This expropriation suit by Dixie Pipeline Company versus John A. Broussard is a companion to two other similar suits. See Dixie Pipeline Company v. Barry, 227 So.2d 1 (No. 2764 on our docket), and Dixie Pipeline Company v. Trosclair, 227 So.2d 13 (No. 2765 on our docket).

For the reasons assigned in Dixie Pipeline Company v. Barry, supra, the judgment appealed from in the instant suit is amended to award additional damages to John A. Broussard in the amount of $739.90 as severance damages related to the taking of the 8-inch pipeline servitude. Defendant is entitled to interest at the rate of *5%*per annum from December 18, 1968, until paid. The judgment is otherwise affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed to plaintiff-appellee.

Amended and affirmed.

HOOD, Judge

(dissenting).

For the reasons set out in my dissent in the companion case of Dixie Pipeline Company v. Barry, 227 So.2d 1 (No. 2764 on our docket), I respectfully dissent from that portion of the judgment on rehearing in the instant suit which awards severance damages to the defendant.

On Application for Rehearing.

En Banc. Rehearing denied.

HOOD, J. and SAVOY, J., are of the opinion that a rehearing should be granted.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 152 (Thursday, August 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20864]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the following National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    The meeting will be open to the public to provide concept review of 
proposed contract or grant solicitations.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
inform the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

    Name of Panel: Clinical Trials in Diabetes and CVD.
    Date: September 19, 1997.
    Time: 8:00 a.m.
    Place: NIH Main Campus, 31 Center Drive, Building 31, 6th Floor, 
C Wing, Conference Room 7.
    Agenda: To consider the need for a clinical trial to determine 
optimal intervention strategies to prevent or reduce CVD in diabetic 
patients.

    Contact Persons:
Peter Savage, M.D., Deputy Director, DECA, II Rockledge Center, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, MSC 7938, Room 8104, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7938, 
(301) 435-0422.
George Sopko, M.D., Medical Officer, DHVD, II Rockledge Center, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, MSC 7940, Room 9176, Bethesda, MD 20892-7940, (301) 
435-0515.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.837, Heart 
and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; and 
93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes 
of Health.)

    Dated: July 31, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-20864 Filed 8-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
**-  Beltsville  \ BARC 
-  Animal & Natural Resources 
-  Animal Improvement Programs 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">	You are here: 						Research / 								**Research Project:**Use of Single Nucleotides Polymorphisms to Verify Parentage
**Location: Animal Improvement Programs**
**2006 Annual Report**
**4d.Progress report.**													This report serves to document research conducted under a specific cooperative agreement between ARS and Holstein Association USA (Brattleboro, VT).  Additional details of research can be found in the report for the parent project 1265-31000-085-00D "Improving Genetic Prediction of Economic Merit of Dairy Animals"; research conducted under the agreement is related to objective 2 (improved accuracy of yield evaluations). Genotypic data have been generated as part of the International Bovine HapMap Consortium, and results from those data will be used to guide selection of single nucleotide polymorphisms for further validation. A large genotyping project also will be initiated to characterize an additional 60,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms to be used to guide marker selection.						
    Project TeamVan Tassell, Curtis  - *Curt*Norman, H  - *Duane* 
Project Annual Reports FY 2008 FY 2007 FY 2006 
Related National Programs Food Animal Production(101)  							Last Modified: 05/12/2009 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
# DLA Director serves as guest lecturer to Army Command and General Staff School

/ Published Nov. 28, 2016

Students at the U.S. Army Command and General Staff School at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, received a special presentation on military logistics, leadership and how to navigate the joint environment from a well-informed guest lecturer Nov. 22. Defense Logistics Agency Director Air Force Lt. Gen. Andrew Busch spoke to the group comprising mid-career Army officers from diverse professional military backgrounds. 

Busch briefed the students on DLA’s support to its customers through its nine supply chains with locations in 48 states and 28 countries around the world. He described the agency’s primary purpose — providing the logistics requirements of the armed forces and other customers for food, clothing, fuel, repair parts and more. The DLA director also informed the group that 1,100 military service members, both active duty and reservists, serve among the 25,000-employee workforce.

“When I talk about who our customers are, there are three groups,” Busch said. “We have the combatant commands, our military service customers and our whole-of-government customers, all of which have different demands. It’s an entirely diverse range of things that we’re involved in at DLA.”

Busch’s overview included a description of the divisions within DLA as well as the agency’s place in the military joint logistics enterprise and the Department of Defense. He informed the group of ongoing initiatives such as performance-based logistics, which places responsibility on industry to improve quality and efficiency in the products it sells to the military. 

Attendees were surprised to learn the level of support DLA provides other federal organizations, like the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Department of State, the U.S. Forest Service and the U.S. Agency for International Development.

Busch offered advice for attendees who increasingly find themselves working in joint environments. “More and more, we’re required to work with people from different services,” he said. “One thing I learned years ago as a lieutenant colonel at DLA was that when you look at how other services do things, don’t be judgmental. It’s not right or wrong, bad or good — it’s just different.”

“This is the first time in many years we’ve had the DLA director speak to our students,” said James Kennedy, assistant professor in the school's Department of Logistics and Resource Operations. “Our students gained valuable insights from Lt. Gen. Busch about the scope and responsibilities of DLA and how they support whole of government and joint operations. We truly appreciate him spending his valuable time with us.” 

The Command and General Staff School at Fort Belvoir is a satellite campus of the Command and General Staff College at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. The curriculum prepares field-grade officers for leadership positions in Army, joint, multinational and interagency organizations executing unified land operations.
#### Clarence SIMPSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1907.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 9, 1977.

*681Clarence Simpson, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *State v. Matera,*266 So.2d 661 (Fla.1972) and *Fulford v. State,*311 So.2d 203 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); *Stullings v. State,*319 So.2d 640 (Fla.1st DCA 1975); Section 945.09(4), Florida Statutes (1974).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0310

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

GALEN LEWIS HAWK,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the reply 

brief and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant has until October 31, 2022, to file the 

reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 26 2022

09/26/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0310
No. 9482.

#### The City of Canton *v.*Studer.

(Decided February 20, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Starlc county.

*Mr. Denver G. Hughes,*city solicitor, for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. W-. O. Werntz,-for*defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF THE PRESIDENT

                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    I, Ramon Chimelis, president, treasurer, and secretary, certify that
the forgoing quarterly report on Form 10-QSB containing the financial
statements set forth within fully comply with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o (d)) and that information contained in the quarterly report
presents fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Big Sky Industries VI, Inc.


Date: May 20, 2003                   /s/ Ramon Chimelis
                                     -----------------------------
                                     Ramon Chimelis
                                     President
#### CHINETTI GARTHWAITE IMPORTS, INC., Appellant, v. Mark SADKIN, Appellee.

No. 77-2369.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 25, 1978.

Tew & Mason, Miami, for appellant.

Kenneth P. Wurtenberger and Ira M. Krauss, Lauderhill, for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., PEARSON, J., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Chinetti Garthwaite Imports, Inc. (Chinetti), filed this interlocutory appeal from an order denying its motion to dismiss.

In this action, the appellee Mark Sadkin sued Ferrari, alleged to be an Italian corporation, Orange Motors of Miami, Inc. (Orange Motors), and Chinetti. Sadkin sought damages for breach of warranty of fitness and merchantability of a Ferrari automobile which he had purchased from Orange Motors for a price of $16,150.00, and which it was alleged had material mechanic defects which the seller had been unable to eliminate and which could not be eliminated. Ferrari was the manufacturer. Chi-netti was the authorized Ferrari distributor for the eastern part of the United States. Orange Motors, of Dade County, was a Ferrari dealer, authorized and acting under a franchise agreement granted by Chinetti.

Chinetti is a corporation formed under the laws of the State of Delaware, having its principal office and place of business in Pennsylvania. Substituted service was made on Chinetti in the manner prescribed in Section 48.081, Florida Statutes (1975), on the basis of it being a foreign corporation engaged ■ in business in Florida. See Sections 48.181, 48.193 and 48.194, Florida Statutes (1975).

Chinetti moved to dismiss, stating as grounds that Chinetti had insufficient contacts in Florida to subject it to jurisdiction, and that there was insufficient service of process. After considering evidence submitted by the parties relevant to the jurisdiction question, the court entered the order appealed from which, without statement of facts or findings, ordered that Chinetti’s motion to dismiss be denied, and setting the time for answer by said defendant.

The appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying its motion to dismiss, on the ground that it was not subject to service under Section 48.181(1) and (2), Florida Statutes (1975). Having reviewed the franchise agreement executed by the parties herein, and having considered the deposition of the president of Orange Motors setting forth the actions of the parties, both prior to and subsequent to execution of the franchise agreement, we find there *91was a sufficient showing to support the ruling, inherent in the order, that the appellant was amenable to service of process under the aforementioned statutes.

Affirmed. '
**Track Records: United States Crop Production (96120)**
#### Frank Albert LOVETT, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 49369.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Aug. 31, 1977.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *State v. Saunders,*339 So.2d 641 (Fla.1976).

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.2

                          Independent Auditors' Consent



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
American Physicians Service Group, Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-66308, No. 333-07427 and No. 333-62233) on Form S-8 of American Physicians
Service Group, Inc. of our report dated April 15, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheet of American Physicians Service Group, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31,
2001, which report appears in the December 31, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K
of American Physicians Service Group, Inc.


                                                        /s/ KPMG LLP
Austin, Texas
March 28, 2003
Exhibit 32.1


                   Suncrest Global Energy Corp.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officer of Suncrest Global Energy Corp. (the
"Company")  certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:

a.    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b.    the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


                                       /s/ John W. Peters
Date: November 8, 2005                 ____________________________________
                                       John W. Peters
                                       Principal Executive Officer
                                       Principal Financial Officer
No. 9582.

#### The State ex rel. The Bellevue Light *&*Power Co. *v.*The Village of Bellevue et al.

(Decided May 22, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Sandusky county.

*Mr. Jesse Vickery; Mr. James Hunt*and *Mr. G. H. Bellman,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. C. A. Wilt; Mr. G. P. Wickham; Mr. L. W. Wickham; Messrs. Mackey & Hoxsey*and *Mr. R. R. Parkhurst,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
- About ARC
              - Appalachian Region
              - Program Areas
              - Grants and Funding

Research, Maps, and Data
            - Research Reports               - Asset-Based Development
              - Business
              - Demographics
              - Distressed Counties
              - Education
              - Energy
              - Evaluations
              - Export and Trade Development
              - Foundations
              - Health Care
              - Infrastructure
              - Leadership Development and Capacity Building
              - Natural Resources
              - Socioeconomic Research
              - Telecommunications
              - Tools
              - Tourism Development
              - Transportation
            - Maps               - Economic Status
              - Education
              - Geography
              - Income
              - Population
              - Poverty
              - Unemployment
            - Data Reports
            - Economic Reports

              - Newsroom
              - Publications

|  |
|--|

HomeResearch, Maps, and DataMapsPopulationPopulation Density Rates in Appalachia, 1990

Print this pageEmail this page

## Population Density Rates in Appalachia, 1990

Population density is a measure of the dispersion of people, which is calculated by dividing the 1990 census population by the 1990 land area in square miles.

Print

PDF version of the map (980 KB)

Excel file of supporting data for the map (80KB)

Data Report

Source and Methodology

Site MapContact ARCPrivacy PolicyWeb PolicyUSA.govOffice of  Inspector General