alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6560

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARVIN ALEXANDER WRIGHT,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. 

Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (9:11-cr-00350-RMG-1)

Submitted: January 21, 2022 Decided: March 7, 2022

Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Jeremy A. Thompson, Assistant Federal Public Defender, OFFICE OF THE 

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. M. Rhett 

DeHart, Acting United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, Nick Bianchi, Assistant 

United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, 

South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Marvin Alexander Wright appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended by the First 

Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. Upon review, 

we discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s determination that Wright failed to

establish extraordinary and compelling reasons warranting his early release. See United 

States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329-30 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021) 

(providing standard of review and outlining steps for evaluating compassionate release 

motions); see also United States v. McCoy, 981 F.3d 271, 282 n.7 (4th Cir. 2020) 

(providing that, although courts may not treat U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual

§ 1B1.13, p.s. (2018) as binding, the policy statement “remains helpful guidance even 

when motions are filed by defendants”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 163 (Friday, August 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44716-44717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22382]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[UT-020-07-1430-00]


Notice of Availability for Proposed Plan Amendment to the Pony 
Express Resource Management Plan in the Salt Lake District, UT

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management completed a Proposed Plan 
Amendment/EA/FONSI for the Pony Express Resource Management Plan (RMP) 
August 11, 1997. The proposed plan amendment specifically addresses the 
management of resources and land uses in the North Oquirrh Mountains on 
a total of 14,254 acres of public land, of which 8,291 acres have been 
acquired

[[Page 44717]]

since the Pony Express RMP was completed in 1990. The proposed plan 
amendment also provides for amendment of the land tenure adjustment 
criteria throughout the Pony Express RMP area. A Notice of Intent 
proposing to amend the RMP was published in the Federal Register on 
June 24, 1996.

DATES: A 30 day protest period for the planning amendment will commence 
with publication of this Notice. Protests must be received on or before 
September 22, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Protests to the proposed plan amendment should be addressed 
to the Director (WO-210), Bureau of Land Management, Attn: Brenda 
Williams, Resource Planning Team, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20240, within 30 days after the date of publication of this Notice for 
the proposed planning amendment.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Nelson, Realty Specialist, Bureau 
of Land Management, Salt Lake District, 2370 South 2300 West, Salt Lake 
City, Utah 84119, telephone (801) 977-4355.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This plan amendment is subject to protest 
from any adversely affected party who participated in the planning 
process. Protests must be made in accordance with provisions of 43 CFR 
1610.5-2, as follows: Protests must pertain to issues that were 
identified in the plan or through the public participation process. As 
a minimum, protests must contain the name, mailing address, telephone 
number, and interest of the person filing the protest. A statement of 
the issue or issues being protested must be included. A statement of 
the part or parts being protested and a citing of pages, paragraphs, 
maps, etc., of the proposed amendment, where practical, should be 
included. A copy of all documents addressing the issue(s) submitted by 
the protester during the planning process or a reference to the date 
when the protester discussed the issue(s) for the record. A concise 
statement as to why the protester believes the BLM State Director's 
decision is incorrect.

    Dated: August 15, 1997.
G. William Lamb,
State Director.
[FR Doc. 97-22382 Filed 8-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-P
Unassociated Document


    Amendment
      No. 1 to Letter Agreement

    


    THIS
      AMENDMENT
      is made
      this 15th day of November, 2007, by and between Trinad
      Capital Master Fund, Ltd. (“Trinad”) and Asianada, Inc. (the “Company”).


    


    WHEREAS,
      the
      Company entered into that certain letter agreement with Trinad dated October
      24,
      2007 (the “Loan Agreement”), in connection with a loan from Trinad to the
      Company of up to a principal amount of $100,000 (the “Loan”); and

    


    WHEREAS,
      the
      Company has requested that Trinad increase the principal amount of the Loan,
      and
      Trinad has agreed to do so, and the parties agree to enter into this
      amendment.

    


    NOW
      THEREFORE,
      for
      good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
      acknowledged, the parties hereby amend the Loan Agreement as
      follows:

    


    	1.  	
            Increase
              in Principal Amount of the Loan.
              The Loan Agreement is hereby amended to (i) increase the principal
              amount
              of the Loan to up to $250,000
              and (ii) the entire outstanding principal amount of the Loan and any
              accrued interest thereon shall be due and payable by the Company upon,
              and
              not prior to, a Next Financing, which shall be increased to an amount
              of
              not less than $500,000.

          


    


    	2.  	
            Ratification.Except
              as herein amended, all of the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement
              are hereby ratified and confirmed, and shall remain in full force and
              effect.

          


    


    Acknowledged
      and agreed to:

    


    Asianada,
      Inc.

     

    
      	
              By:

            	
               

              /s/
                Charles
                Bentz                             
                

            	
               

            
	
               

            	
              Name:
                Charles Bentz

            	
               

            
	
               

            	
              Title:
                Chief Financial Officer 

            	
               

            


    

    


    Trinad
      Capital Master Fund, Ltd.

    


    
      	
              By:

            	
               

              /s/
                Jay
                Wolf                                    
                

            	
               

            
	
               

            	
              Name:
                Jay Wolf

            	
               

            
	
               

            	
              Title:
                Director
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries IV, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 4, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries IV, Inc.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Bernard POMES, III, and Wanda Hamilton.

No. 61310.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 27, 1978.

In re: Bernard Pomes, III and Wanda Hamilton applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order. Parish of Jefferson.

Denied.

TATE, CALOGERO and DENNIS, JJ., would grant.
#### Hugh Lee WOOD, Sr., Appellant, v. Molly Roberts WOOD, Appellee.

Nos. 77-577, 77-578.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 30, 1978.

Richard A. Burt and Thomas D. Wood, Miami, for appellant.

Frates, Floyd, Pearson, Stewart, Richman & Greer and Scott D. Sheftall, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY and HUBBART, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant/respondent/husband takes this consolidated appeal from a post dissolution of marriage “order on alimony, child support, attorneys’ fees and costs.”

The sole issue on appeal is whether the chancellor abused his discretion in entering an order which reserved jurisdiction to award permanent alimony to appellee/peti-tioner/wife. It is appellant’s contention that the chancellor abused his discretion in reserving jurisdiction in that said reservation was incorporated in the above order without giving appellant an opportunity to present evidence as to the wife’s need, if any, for such an award of alimony. It is our opinion, however, that no abuse of discretion has been shown.

The order appealed from was rendered after a judgment dissolving the marriage of the parties was entered. Said order, *inter alia,*awarded appellee lump sum alimony and found appellant presently incapable of paying periodic alimony. The chancellor, however, reserved jurisdiction to award permanent alimony.

Based upon our view of the record, appellant’s “notice” or “due process” argument appears to miss the mark, for the chancellor did not award periodic alimony to appellee; rather, he reserved jurisdiction to award same at such future date as appel-lee could demonstrate a material change in the circumstances of the parties as would warrant such an award. A reservation of jurisdiction for such a purpose is, of course, permissible. *Marshall v. Marshall,*273 So.2d 107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); *Poe v. Poe,*263 So.2d 644 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). At such time when appellee does, in fact, petition the court for an award of permanent alimony, appellant will then be given the opportunity to present evidence in opposition to such an award.

*24Accordingly, no abuse of discretion having been shown, the order appealed from is hereby affirmed. .

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20720]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[WY-921-41-5700; WYW141032]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

July 28, 1997.
    Pursuant to the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas 
lease WYW141032 for lands in Lincoln County, Wyoming, was timely filed 
and was accompanied by all the required rentals accruing from the date 
of termination.
    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and 
royalties at rates of $5.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year and 
16\2/3\ percent, respectively.
    The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $125 
to reimburse the Department for the cost of this Federal Register 
notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of 
the lease as set out in Section 31 (d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands 
Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management 
is proposing to reinstate lease WYW141032 effective April 1, 1997, 
subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease and the 
increased rental and royalty rates cited above.
Pamela J. Lewis,
Chief, Leasable Minerals Section.
[FR Doc. 97-20720 Filed 8-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
**Exhibit
      23.1**




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (No.
      333-39821, No. 333-44313, No. 333-129295 and No. 333-141736) on Form S-8 of
      our
      report dated September 20, 2007 (which report expresses an unqualified
      opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of
      Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based
      Payment” on July 1, 2005), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
      Memry Corporation for the year ended June 30, 2007.




/s/
                Deloitte & Touche LLPStamford,
                ConnecticutSeptember 20,
                2007
# C_2023260EN.01000101.xml

| 24.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/1

---

Joint statement of the European Parliament and of the Council

(2023/C 260/01)

The European Parliament and the Council acknowledge the urgency of the need to help the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) to ramp up production in the context of the challenges created by Russia’s unprovoked and unjustified war of aggression against Ukraine, and recall that the Regulation on supporting ammunition production (ASAP) provides an immediate response to that urgent need by putting in place a new temporary instrument to facilitate industrial investments.

The European Parliament and the Council stress the need to consider all appropriate measures to strengthen and develop the EDTIB, including small and medium-sized enterprises, and to remove obstacles and bottlenecks so as to allow the industry to produce more along the value chains.

The European Parliament and the Council therefore call on the Commission to consider, as appropriate, putting forward as soon as possible any further initiatives necessary to strengthen the EDTIB, including adequate financing, for instance in the context of the European Defence Investment Programme, as well as a legal framework aimed at ensuring security of supply and supporting ammunition production.

The European Parliament and the Council agree to examine any such initiatives without delay and in a spirit of mutual sincere cooperation.

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeCustomer SupportTrainingDetails

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Fuel Cards

DLA Energy’s Government Fuel Card Program Management office performs overall program management responsibilities, training and support for DLA’s customer purchasing tools used worldwide: the Aviation Into plane Reimbursement Card®, Ships’ Bunkers Easy Acquisition Card Order Management System®, Swipe SEA Card® and DoD Fleet Card.

Fuel Card-related training for each type of card is available on the weblinks below.

## Learn more about the

                              - **AIR Card**
                              - **SEA Card**
                              - **Swipe SEA Card**
                              - **Fleet Card**
                              - **Logistics Fuel Card**

 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

AIR CardSEA CARDSwipe SEA CARDFleet CardLOG fuel cardLogistics Fuel Card
Improvements to Federal Hiring Experience 
New guidance for job applicants, managers, and HR professionals

Planning to Retire Soon? 
New video explains the process 

Workforce of the Future Initiative 
OPM's new hiring playbook & trainings for federal agencies 

## Job Seekers

          - USAJOBS
          - Students & Grads
          - Federal Hiring FAQs
View More **

## Federal Employees & Annuitants

          - Pay Tables
          - Healthcare
          - Retirement Center
View More **

## HR Practitioners

          - Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
          - Hiring Authorities
          - Assessment and Selection
View More **

## Recent News

OPM Announces Resources for Postal Service Health Benefit Program Enrollees 

OPM today shared new enrollee resources ahead of the inaugural launch of the Postal Service Health Benefits Program this Open Season.						

2023 OPM Federal Employee Benefits Survey (FEBS) Underscores Wide Satisfaction 

OPM today released results from the 2023 OPM Federal Employee Benefits Survey (FEBS). Results from the 2023 FEBS underscore wide satisfaction federal employees have with available benefit programs, and an overwhelmingly positive assessment of those offered under the Biden-Harris Administration. 						

Biden-Harris Administration Issues Memorandum Supporting Improvements to Federal Hiring Experience

OPM and OMB issued a joint memorandum to provide guidance to federal agencies on how to improve the hiring experience for job applicants, managers, and HR professionals.						

Joint Message on National Whistleblower Appreciation Day Issued by the OPM Acting Director and OPM Inspector General

July 30th is Whistleblower Appreciation Day. This day serves as a reminder each year of the critical role whistleblowers play in promoting accountability and efficiency in the federal government						

ICYMI: OPM Highlights Key Actions Supporting AI Talent Surge to Recruit and Hire AI Professionals  

OPM highlights key actions taken to recruit, hire, and train AI and AI-related talent into the federal government. OPM’s efforts support the AI in Government Act of 2020 and President Biden’s landmark Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy AI.   						

## Frequently Asked Questions

Search

### Trending Topics

            -  Insure 
            -  Work Life 
            -  Retire 
            -  Personnel Documentation 
            -  Telework 
            -  Pay and Leave 

Skip to main content

### In this section
#### Sessel D. CAIN v. DONALD G. LAMBERT CONTRACTORS, INC.

No. 60782.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 1977.

In re: Sessel D. Cain applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 349 So.2d 427.

Writ denied.
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF
2002
 
 I, Roger
N. Wurtele, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of
Energy & Engine Technology Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Energy
& Engine Technology Corporation.
 
 Date:
      November 14, 2005
    /s/
      Roger N. WurteleRoger
      N. WurteleChief
      Financial Officer
 
  32