alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Michael B. SMALL and Ann Small, his wife, Petitioners, v. LOWEN AIR CONDITIONING, INC., a Florida Corporation, Respondent.

No. 76-2744.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 12, 1977.

Philip J. Gouze, Law Offices of Michael B. Small, P. A., West Palm Beach, for petitioners.

John A. Gentry, III, Moyle, Gentry, Jones, Flanigan & Groner, P. A., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

LETTS, Judge.

The judge’s order is quashed upon the authority of *Gordon v. Warren Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc.,*340 So.2d 1234 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Curtis Wayne Teer, * From the County Court at Law

No. 2 of Midland County,

Trial Court No. FM

- 58,485

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 5

- 00 061

- CV * February 16, 2017

Paula Neal, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
# L_2023069EN.01000501.xml

| 7.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 69/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 69/5

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION (CFSP) 2023/495

of 28 February 2023

on the acceptance of a third State’s contribution to the European Union Military Assistance Mission in support of Ukraine (EUMAM Ukraine) (EUMAM Ukraine/1/2023)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 38, third paragraph, thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1968 of 17 October 2022 on a European Union Military Assistance Mission in support of Ukraine (EUMAM Ukraine) (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2022/1968, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee to take the relevant decisions on acceptance of the proposed contributions by third States to EUMAM Ukraine. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2022/1968, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee to take the relevant decisions on acceptance of the proposed contributions by third States to EUMAM Ukraine.

| (2) | Following the recommendations regarding a contribution from Norway by the EUMAM Ukraine Mission Commander and by the European Union Military Committee, the contribution from Norway should be accepted and considered to be significant, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following the recommendations regarding a contribution from Norway by the EUMAM Ukraine Mission Commander and by the European Union Military Committee, the contribution from Norway should be accepted and considered to be significant,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1.   The contribution from Norway to the European Union Military Assistance Mission in support of Ukraine (EUMAM Ukraine) is accepted and is considered to be significant.

2.   Norway is exempted from financial contributions to the budget of EUMAM Ukraine.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 28 February 2023.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

D. PRONK

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 18.10.2022, p. 85.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of
chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of MCI, Inc. (the Company), that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of
the Company for the period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of the Company. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such report. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: August 30, 2005



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|                                           
|                                           
|/s/ Michael D. Capellas                    
|Michael D. Capellas Chief Executive
Officer





|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|                                         
|/s/ Robert T. Blakely                    
|Robert T. Blakely Chief Financial
Officer
50 6th Judicial District Court 

Albert M. McCaig, Jr., Judge 

www.Court506.com 

June 8, 2015 

Court of Criminal Appeals 

P .0. Box 12308 

Capitol Station 

Austin, Texas 78711 

RECEIVED IN 

C21URT OF CRIMINA1 P.~PEALS 

JUN 10 2015 

Court Coordinator 

Susie Schubert 

Court Reporter 

Robyn S. Wiley 

Grimes County 

Waller County 

836 Austin Street, Suite 307 

Hempstead, Texas 77445 

Fax: 979.826.9149 

Ofc: 979.921.0921 

Re: Writs ~umber 08-09-12976£ through 08-09-12986E 

Criminal Trial Court Number 08-09-12976 through 08:-09-12986 

Ex Parte 

William Andrew Allen 

Clerk: 

I am the trial court judge in the referenced matter. This is my second letter to the Court 

on this subject. The Applicant's cases were originally heard by the 155th Judicial District 

Court. By Legislative act (Section 24.254, Government Code), effective January 1, 2014, the 

506th Judicial District Court took over all cases pending in the 155th Judicial District Court. 

The Applicant, Mr. William Andrew Allen, has made numerous filings with the trial 

court pertaining to his 11.07 Writ applications, many of which have had to do with his 

contention that the 506th court does not have jurisdiction of his cases. . 

Mr. Allen's frequent and continuous supplementation and filings has required both 

this court and the Waller County District Clerk, to provide eleven separate supplements to 

the several11.07 Applications each time Mr. Ailen files new allegations. This has become 

labor and resource intensive, consumes valuable time, and, to date, does not appear to have 

provided any substantial new information to your court. He is on his fifth filing on each of 

the eleven cases. 

I am requesting the Honorable Texas Court of Criminal Appeals to declare Mr. 

William Andrew Allen a vexatious litigant, and to deny him further access to the courts until 

his current applications for 11.07 relief have been ruled on by your court. 

AMMI 

c: Waller County District Clerk 

Mr. William Andrew Allen 

~f/i41c . 

/~~~~!-~·.McCAIG, Judge, Prestdmg 

Mr. Elton Mathis, Waller County District Attorney 

,..,
Exhibit 32.1



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Harold Minksy, Chief Executive Officer
and President and Chief Financial Officer of Allied Ventures Holding Corp. certify that:



|1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2014, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                              
|2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.                                  



|Date: September
24, 2015 | /s/Harold Minsky       
|------------------------ | -----------------------
|                         | Harold Minsky          
|                         | Chief Executive Officer
|                         | Chief Financial Officer
# DLA Distribution Joint Reserve Senior Leader Conference

/ Published Jan. 13, 2017
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, 
A group of military reservists newly assigned to leadership positions in the Defense Logistics Agency Joint Reserve Force (JRF) got a crash course in the agency’s mission, organization and operations at the 9th annual New Leaders Conference, held at DLA Distribution in New Cumberland, Pa., from Jan. 6 to 8.
The agenda included an overview of the DLA and joint force mission, information about training and mobilization, and service-specific briefings by Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps Reserve representatives.

According to the event’s organizer, Navy Supply Corps Lt. Justin Champine, more than half of DLA’s military force is made up of reservists from all branches of the service – about 650 Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines.

“Most DLA field activities have an attached reserve unit to provide support,” said Champine who also serves as DLA’s JRF Joint Operational support officer.  “We were fortunate to have representatives from each of the agency’s Primary-Level Field Activities participate in the conference.”

The guest speaker for the event was Navy Supply Corps Rear Adm. Deborah Haven, DLA JRF director.  She offered encouragement and thanks to DLA reservists, saying “You have a proud legacy.  That speaks volumes.”  

However, Haven cautioned those in attendance that expectations are high for leaders in DLA. “New leaders in particular should remember that they are on display all the time,” she said. “Set your standards high. Your team looks to you for training, leadership and knowledge.  In return you also have expectations for your team, and you need to communicate those expectations.”

Haven also urged her new leaders to consider the responsibility they assumed by joining the DLA Joint Reserve Force. “This is not the reserve force I joined – the ‘two days a month, two weeks a year’ reserve.  It’s an operationalized reserve now. “

Originally, Haven had requested that the conference be designed to give new leaders some insight into the challenges they would face while assigned to DLA.  Champine said that he kept Haven’s intent in mind as he organized the conference, and is satisfied the event exceeded expectations.  “I think we hit a home run.  We offered a unique opportunity for new leaders within the reserve community to see how we operate, and get a first-hand perspective from the Admiral.”
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 160 (Tuesday, August 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44117-44118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21954]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3847-000]


MidAmerican Energy Company; Notice of Filing

August 13, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 24, 1997, MidAmerican Energy Company 
(MidAmerican), 666 Grand Avenue, Des Moines, Iowa 50309 filed with the 
Commission a Non-Firm Transmission Service Agreement with NESI Power 
Marketing, Inc. (NESI), dated July 15, 1997 entered into pursuant to 
MidAmerican's Open Access Transmission Tariff.
    MidAmerican requests an effective date of July 15, 1997, for the 
Agreement and accordingly seeks a waiver of the Commission's notice 
requirement. MidAmerican has served a copy of the filing on NESI, the 
Iowa Utilities Board, the Illinois Commerce Commission and the South 
Dakota Public Utilities Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion

[[Page 44118]]

to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with 
Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
(18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or protests 
should be filed on or before August 26, 1997. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of the filing are on file with the Commission and are 
available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21954 Filed 8-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
S. 1282

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

An Act

To amend the Communications Satellite Act of 1962 to strike the privatization

criteria for INTELSAT separated entities, remove certain restrictions on separated

and successor entities to INTELSAT, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINANCIAL INTERESTS OF OFFICERS, MANAGERS, OR

DIRECTORS.

Section 621(5)(D) of the Communications Satellite Act of 1962

(47 U.S.C. 763(5)(D)) is amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘(I)’’ in clause (ii);

(2) by striking ‘‘signatories, or (II)’’ in clause (ii) and all

that follows through ‘‘mechanism;’’ and inserting ‘‘signatories;

and’’;

(3) by striking ‘‘organization; and’’ in clause (iii) and

inserting ‘‘organization.’’; and

(4) by striking clause (iv).

SEC. 2. CRITERIA FOR INTELSAT SEPARATED ENTITIES.

Subtitle B of title VI of the Communications Satellite Act

of 1962 (47 U.S.C. 763 et seq.) is amended by striking section

623 (47 U.S.C. 763b).

SEC. 3. PRESERVATION OF SPACE SEGMENT CAPACITY OF THE GMDSS.

Section 624 of the Communications Satellite Act of 1962 (47

U.S.C. 763c) is amended to read as follows:

‘‘SEC. 624. SPACE SEGMENT CAPACITY OF THE GMDSS.

‘‘The United States shall preserve the space segment capacity

of the GMDSS. This section is not intended to alter the status

that the GMDSS would otherwise have under United States laws

and regulations of the International Telecommunication Union with

respect to spectrum, orbital locations, or other operational parameters, or to be a barrier to competition for the provision of GMDSS

services.’’.

SEC. 4. SATELLITE SERVICE REPORT.

(a) ANNUAL REPORT.—The Federal Communications Commission shall review competitive market conditions with respect to

domestic and international satellite communications services and

shall include in an annual report an analysis of those conditions.

The Commission shall transmit a copy of the report to the Senate

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the

House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce.

(b) CONTENT.—The Commission shall include in the report—
S. 1282—2

(1) an identification of the number and market share of

competitors in domestic and international satellite markets;

(2) an analysis of whether there is effective competition

in the market for domestic and international satellite services;

and

(3) a list of any foreign nations in which legal or regulatory

practices restrict access to the market for satellite services

in such nation in a manner that undermines competition or

favors a particular competitor or set of competitors.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
ex10-7.htm


    EXHIBIT
      10.7

     

    
NS8
      CORPORATION

    


    AMENDMENT
      NO. 1

    TO
      WARRANT NO. CCP-002

    


    


    THIS
      WARRANT AMENDMENT SHOULD BE ATTACHED TO THE

    ORIGINAL
      WARRANT CERTIFICATE

    


     

    This
      Amendment No. 1 to Warrant (this “Amendment”) is issued in connection with that
      certain Warrant No. CCP-002 (the “Warrant”) issued by NS8 Corporation, (the
“Company”) to Cornell
      Capital Partners, L.P. (the “Holder”), pursuant to which the
      Holder is entitled to purchase from the Company at any time or from time to
      time
      during the period specified the Warrant 10,000,000 shares of
      the Company’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share.

    


    THIS
      CERTIFIES THAT, the following amendments are hereby made to the
      Warrant:

     

    
      	
              ·  

            	
              Pursuant
                to the application of Section 8(a) of the Warrant, the exercise price
                of
                the Warrant is hereby adjusted to be $0.02 per share effective as
                of the
                date hereof.

            


    

     

    


     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be signed by
      its duly authorized officer.

     

    NS8
      CORPORATION

    


    


    


    
      	
               

            	
               

            	
               

            
	
              Date: July
                20, 2007

            	
              By:  

            	
              /s/ George
                G.
                O’Leary                  
                

            
	
               

            	
              George
                G. O’Leary

            
	
               

            	
              Chief
                Financial Officer

              (Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)
National Wildlife Refuge
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44301]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22037]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Under OMB Review

ACTION: Notice of reporting requirements submitted for review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), agencies are required to submit proposed reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and approval, and to 
publish a notice in the Federal Register notifying the public that the 
agency has made such a submission.

DATES: Comments should be submitted on or before September 18, 1997. If 
you intend to comment but cannot prepare comments promptly, please 
advise the OMB Reviewer and the Agency Clearance Officer before the 
deadline.
    Copies: Request for clearance (OMB 83-1), supporting statement, and 
other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from the 
Agency Clearance Officer. Submit comments to the Agency Clearance 
Officer and the OMB Reviewer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Agency Clearance Officer: Jacqueline White, Small Business 
Administration, 409 3rd Street, S.W., 5th Floor, Washington, D.C. 
20416, Telephone: (202) 205-6629.
    OMB Reviewer: Victoria Wassmer, Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive 
Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20503.
    Title: Business Information Center Customer Satisfaction Survey.
    Form No: 1916.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    Description of Respondents: Small Business Clients.
    Annual Responses: 22,500.
    Annual Burden: 225

    Dated: August 15, 1997.
Jacqueline White,
Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
[FR Doc. 97-22037 Filed 8-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
No. 9212.

#### King *v.*The Toledo Loan Company et al.

(Decided April 10, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Lucas county.

*474*Mr. A. W. Eckert*and *Mr. John A. King,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. King <& Tracy*and *Mr. Frank H. Geer,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1368 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1368

    To extend the existence of the Parole Commission, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 1, 2005

Mr. Specter (for himself and Mr. Leahy) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the existence of the Parole Commission, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States Parole Commission 
Extension and Sentencing Commission Authority Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXISTENCE OF THE PAROLE COMMISSION.

    For purposes of section 235(b) of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 
(98 Stat. 2032) as such section relates to chapter 311 of title 18, 
United States Code, and the United States Parole Commission, each 
reference in such section to ``eighteen years'' or ``eighteen-year 
period'' shall be deemed a reference to ``21 years'' or ``21-year 
period'', respectively.

SEC. 3. PROVISION OF EMERGENCY AMENDMENT AUTHORITY FOR SENTENCING 
              COMMISSION.

    In accordance with the procedure set forth in section 21(a) of the 
Sentencing Act of 1987 (Public Law 100-182), as though the authority 
under that Act had not expired, the United States Sentencing Commission 
shall--
            (1) not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment 
        of this Act, amend the Federal sentencing guidelines, 
        commentary, and policy statements to implement section 6703 of 
        the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 
        (Public Law 108-458); and
            (2) not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment 
        of this Act, amend the Federal sentencing guidelines, 
        commentary, and policy statements to implement section 3 of the 
        Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-358).
                                 <all>
```