alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 153 (Friday, August 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20939]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration
[A-821-808]


Postponement of Final Determination; Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon 
Steel Plate From the Russian Federation

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of postponement of final determination of sales at less 
than fair value.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 8, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nithya Nagarajan, Eugenia Chu, or Yury Beyzarov, Import Administration, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230; 
telephone: (202) 482-3793.

The Applicable Statute and Regulations

    Unless other indicated, all citations to the statute are references 
to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective date of the 
amendments made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) by the Uruguay 
Rounds Agreements Act (URAA). In addition, unless otherwise indicated, 
all citations to the Department's regulations are in reference to the 
regulations, codified at 19 CFR part 353, as they existed on April 1, 
1996.

Postponement of Final Determination

    Pursuant to section 735(a)(2) of the Act, on July 29, 1997, JSC 
Severstal (Severstal) a producer of subject merchandise; requested a 
thirty-day extension of the final determination.
    Severstal accounts for a significant proportion of exports of the 
subject merchandise. In addition, we are not aware of any compelling 
reasons for denying this request. However, due to the complexity of the 
issues involved in the case, including surrogate values, and the scope 
of the subject merchandise, we are postponing the final determination 
in this investigation until 135 days after the publication of the 
preliminary determination. Therefore, the final determination will be 
due no later than October 24, 1997. Suspension of liquidation will be 
extended in accordance with section 733(d) of the Act. See Notice of 
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Pasta 
from Italy, 61 Fed. Reg. 30326, 30326 (June 14, 1996).
    This notice of postponement is published pursuant to 19 CFR 
353.20(b)(2).

    Dated: July 31, 1997.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-20939 Filed 8-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
Exhibit 23.1

                       Independent Auditors' Consent



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
of  1MAGE Software, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-35265) and on Forms S-8
(File Nos. 33-78096 & 333-30787) of our report dated February 11, 1997, on
our  audits of the financial statements and financial statement  schedules
of  1mage  Software, Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and for the years  ended
December  31,  1996  and  1995, which report is included  in  this  Annual
Report.

/s/ Karsh & Company, P.C.
-------------------------
Karsh & Company, P.C.


Denver, CO
March 16, 1998
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

#  DLA ‘continues to press’ cloud computing integration 

By By DLA Information OperationsDLA Public Affairs

                Fort Belvoir, VA  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA Informatino Operationscloudcybersecurity
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 159 (Monday, August 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21757]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 2145-030]


Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County, Washington; 
Notice of Application for Approval of Canadian Entitlement Allocation 
Extension Agreement Beyond the Term of the License

August 12, 1997.
    On July 24, 1997, pursuant to Section 22 of the Federal Power Act, 
16 U.S.C. Sec. 815, Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County, 
Washington (Chelan), filed an application requesting Commission 
approval of the Canadian Entitlement Allocation Extension Agreement 
(CEAA) for the Rocky Reach Project No. 2145, for a period extending 
approximately 18 years beyond the 2006 expiration date of the license. 
The project is located on the Columbia River in Chelan County, 
Washington.
    Section 22 provides that contracts for the sale and delivery of 
power for periods extending beyond the termination date of a license 
may be entered into upon the joint approval of the Commission and the 
appropriate state public service commission or other similar authority 
in the state in which the sale or delivery of power is made. Chelan 
states in its application that approval of the CEAA is in the public 
interest because it implements provisions of a 1961 Treaty between the 
United States and Canada, 15 U.S.T. 1555.
    The CEAA was executed on April 29, 1997, between Chelan and the 
United States of America, acting by and through the Bonneville Power 
Administration, and provides for delivery of power from the Rocky Reach 
Project for transfer to Canada in exchange for Chelan's use of the 
improved streamflow provided by Canadian water storage projects 
pursuant to the 1961 Treaty. Chelan will retain one-half of the power 
generation benefits of the improved streamflow.
    Anyone may submit comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in 
accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, 385.211 and 385.214. In determining the 
appropriate action to take, the Commission will consider all protests 
and other comments, but only those who file a motion to intervene may 
become a party to the proceeding. Comments, protests, or motions to 
intervene must be filed by September 17, 1997; must bear in all capital 
letters the title ``COMMENTS,'' ``PROTEST,'' or ``MOTION TO 
INTERVENE,'' as applicable, and ``Project No. 2145.'' Send the filings 
(original and 14 copies) to: The Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. A copy of any 
filing must also be served upon each representative of the licensee 
specified in its application.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21757 Filed 8-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# Navy's fleet ordnance and supply director visits DLA Troop Support

/ Published May 11, 2017
Philadelphia, 
Rear Adm. Peter G. Stamatopoulos (at head of table), the director of fleet ordnance and supply at Navy Fleet Forces Command, receives a briefing about the Clothing and Textile supply chain at DLA Troop Support in Philadelphia May 4. Stamatopoulos visited each of Troop Support’s supply chains and other organizations on Naval Support Activity-Philadelphia. Troop Support plays a large role in Fleet Forces Command’s mission to equip Naval Forces for assignment to combatant commanders. Photo by Shawn J. Jones.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 28, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00223

- CV

Maria Lidia GONZALEZ et al

,

Appellants

v.

Estate of Idelfonso RAMIREZ

,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6215

Hono rable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The second motion for extension of time to file stipulated record is hereby GRANTED.

Time is extended to November 28, 2017.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 28th day of November, 2 017

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
No. 9632.

#### The State ex rel. Hayes *v.*Parker, Treas., et al.

(Decided February 27, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Lucas county.

*440
      *Mr. B. A-. Hayes,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Ulery, Martin & Webster,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. John KNIGHT.

No. 60275.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 27, 1977.

Thomas J. Ford, Jr., Patrick McArdle, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Louise Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Pharoah BAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF MERRYYILLE et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 6343.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

March 7, 1978.

D. Michael Mooney and Joe J. Tritico, Lake Charles, for plaintiff-appellant.

David W. Burton and James K. Nichols, DeRidder, for defendants-appellees.

Before CULPEPPER, FORET and JOHNSON, JJ.

FORET, Judge.

For the reasons stated in the companion case of *Mikkelsen v. City of DeRidder,*357 So.2d 14 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1978, our docket number 6345), in which a separate decision has been rendered by us on this date, the judgment appealed herein is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed to the appellants in these consolidated cases, to be shared equally among them.

AFFIRMED.
#### Thomas W. WOODWORTH, Appellant, v. METALLIC ENGINEERING COMPANY and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Appellees.

No. 77-490.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 11, 1978.

Krupnick & Campbell and John R. Gillespie, Jr. and Kevin Malone, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellant.

Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, McMath, Tu-tan & O’Hara and Richard Sherman, Miami, for appellees.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON, J., and Charles Carroll (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Carter v. Sims Crane Service, Inc.,*198 So.2d 25 (Fla.1967); *Slack*v. *Acousti Engineering Company of Florida,*122 So.2d 574 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960); *Gross v. Rudey’s Stone Co., Inc.,*179 So.2d 603 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965).
FAA Home
Airports
Resources
Series 150 Advisory Circulars (ACs) for Airport Projects

# AC 120-38 - Transport Category Airplanes Cabin Ozone Concentrations

- ShareShare
- 

- Facebook					Share on Facebook
- Twitter					Tweet on Twitter

## Document Information

- Number
- 120-38
- Title
- Transport Category Airplanes Cabin Ozone Concentrations
- Status
- Active
- Date issued
- 1980-10-10
- Office of Primary Responsibility
- AFS-260
- Description
- 														Provides guidance concerning acceptable means, but not the only means, for an air carrier to demonstrate compliance with the maximum permissible cabin ozone (03) concentrations established by Section 121.578 of the Federal Aviation Regulations.						
- Content
-    -  AC 120-38  (PDF) 

## View All

      - Current Series 150 ACs
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs
      - Draft Series 150 ACs
      - Advisory Circulars

## Export All

      - Current Series 150 ACs  (CSV)
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs  (CSV)

## Top Requests

      - AC 150/5300-13B, Airport Design
      - AC 150/5320-6G, Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation
      - AC 150/5370-10H, Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports
      - AC 150/5340-1M, Standards for Airport Markings
      - AC 150/5340-30J, Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual Aids
      - AC 150/5390-2C, Heliport Design
No. 00-7062.

#### Scallio *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 12-50240 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. RUBEN DARIO MUNOZ-PACHECO, also known as Ruben Munoz Pacheco, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:11-CR-2483-1
Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ruben Dario MunozPacheco has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Munoz-Pacheco has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and t h e relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate revi e w . Ac c o rdingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, coun s e l i s excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Decem ber 1 7, 2 012 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 12-50240 Document: 00512085532 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2012
No. 00-7059.

#### Sager *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7578** 

VERNARD JEROME MATHIS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. LEROY CARTLEDGE, Warden McCormick Correctional Institution , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken
. Richard M
. Gergel , District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv - 02383

- RMG )

Submitted : December 6, 2012 Decided: December 12, 2012

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Jeremy A. Thompson, LAW OFFICE OF JEREMY A. THOMPSON, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant A ttorney General, Alphonso Simon , Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Vernard Jerome Mathis seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certif icate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constituti onal right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mathis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argumen t would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### John WALLACE v. PAN AM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO. et al. H. F. McMULLEN v. PAN AM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO. et al.

No. 61350.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1978.

In re: Wanda Petroleum Co. and Insurance Company of North America, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Vernon. 352 So.2d 1048, 352 So.2d 1058.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS and CALOGERO, JJ., would grant the writ.
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE


CONTACT:          Roy
Estridge. EVP/CFO




Valley
Commerce Bancorp




(559)
622-9000







Valley
Commerce Bancorp Announces 5% Stock Dividend





VISALIA,
Calif., May 21, 2008 -- At Valley Commerce Bancorp’s annual meeting held May 20,
2008, Walter Dwelle, Chairman of the Board, announced a 5% stock dividend will
be issued to shareholders in mid-June.  The stock dividend will be
provided to shareholders of record as of June 11, 2008.  It is the
ninth stock dividend issued by the Company.




Valley
Commerce Bancorp is the parent company of Valley Business Bank which operates
branch offices in Visalia, Woodlake, Tipton, Tulare, and Fresno.




Also at
the shareholders’ meeting, the following persons were elected to the board of
directors:  David B. Day, Walter A. Dwelle, Thomas A. Gaebe, Donald A.
Gilles, Philip R. Hammond, Jr., Russell F. Hurley, Fred P. LoBue, Jr., Kenneth
H. Macklin, and Barry R. Smith.









OTHER
INFORMATION:  Valley Commerce Bancorp stock trades on NASDAQ’s Over
The Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol VCBP.  Valley Business
Bank, the wholly owned subsidiary of Valley Commerce Bancorp, is a commercial
bank that commenced operations in 1996 under the name Bank of Visalia. Valley
Business Bank operates through Business Banking Centers in Visalia, Tulare, and
Fresno and has branch offices in Woodlake and Tipton.  Additional
information about Valley Business Bank is available from the Bank’s website at
http://www.valleybusinessbank.net.




FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS:  In addition to historical information, this release
includes forward-looking statements, which reflect management's current
expectations for Valley Commerce Bancorp’s future financial results, business
prospects and business developments.  Management's expectations for
Valley Commerce Bancorp's future necessarily involve assumptions, estimates and
the evaluation of risks and uncertainties. Various factors could cause actual
events or results to differ materially from those expectations.  The
forward-looking statements contained herein represent management's expectations
as of the date of this release. Valley Commerce Bancorp undertakes no obligation
to release publicly the results of any revisions to the forward-looking
statements included herein to reflect events or circumstances after today, or to
reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.  For those statements,
the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking
statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6242

FRANKLIN W. DAVIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ROANOKE PUBLIC DEFENDERS; JUDGE CARSON; CRYSTAL SMITH, 

Commonwealth’s Attorney,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (7:22-cv-00678-JPJ-PMS)

Submitted: June 22, 2023 Decided: June 27, 2023

Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Franklin W. Davis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6242 Doc: 13 Filed: 06/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Franklin W. Davis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues 

raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Davis’ informal brief does not 

challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of 

the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The 

informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited 

to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6242 Doc: 13 Filed: 06/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 2