alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Kathy Rhem

### Deputy Director of DLA Public Affairs

### 

### 

Kathleen Rhem is the Deputy Director of DLA Public Affairs. She most recently served as the Communications Manager for DLA Human Resources, overseeing the employee communications efforts surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, the DoD Anti-extremism Stand Down, the roll-out of the DoD Performance Management and Appraisal Program, multiple government shutdowns, and the OPM data breach. She previously served as Chief of News and Web Operations in DLA Public Affairs and is a former Managing Editor of American Forces Press Service (now DoD News Service). As an AFPS writer/editor under three defense secretaries, Rhem covered the events of 9/11 from the Pentagon and DoD/government operations in some 40 countries, including Iraq, Afghanistan and Kosovo.

Rhem served 13 years as a public affairs specialist in the U.S. Army, leaving active duty in 2002 as a sergeant first class. Her military career included United Nations and NATO deployments to Macedonia and Bosnia, as well as assignments in 3rd Infantry Division, tactical signal and air defense artillery brigades, and the Military District of Washington. She has won several awards for writing and editing from the Army, Defense Department and National Association of Government Communicators.

She is originally from Northern Illinois, is married to a retired Army chief warrant officer, and has three adult daughters.
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_______ _______ __________
No. ACM S32475

_______ _______ __________
UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Mallory E. TOMPKINS Airman First Class (E

- 3 ) , U.S. Air Force, Appellant

_______ _______ __________ Appeal from the Un ited States Air Force Trial Judiciary

Decided 28 March 2018

_______ _______ __________ Military Judge: Ryan A. Hendricks.
Approved sentence: Bad

- conduct discharge, confinement for 2 months, forfeiture of $500.00 pay per month for 2 months, and reduction to E

1. Sentence adjudged 18 May 2017 by SpCM convened at MacDill Air Force Base, Florida

. For Appellant: Major Patrick A. Clary, USAF.
For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph Kubler, USAF; Mary Ellen Payne, Esquire.

Before HARDING, SPERANZA, and HUYGEN

, App ellate Military Judges

.

_______ _______ __________
This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

_______ _______ __________ PE R CURIAM : The approved findings and sentence are correct i n law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant ’ s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice

, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c).United States v. Tompkins , No. ACM S32475

2 Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE Clerk of the Court
BEVERIDGE &

&DIAMOND~

Megan B. Haebler

1350 I Street, N.w.

Suite 700

Washington, D.C. 20005-3311

Direct: (202) 789-6128

Fax: (202) 789-6190

mhaebler@bdlaw.com

May 5, 2009

VIA FACSIMILE 202-566-2147

Freedom of Information Officer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Ariel Rios Building, Me 1105A

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20460

Re: FOIA Request

Dear FOIA Officer:

Pursuant to the Freedom ofInformation Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, as amended, and the FOIA

regulations promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 40 C.F.R. Part 2, I

hereby request all communications and information related to sales of an unregistered

ammonium-based biocide product or an unregistered urea-based biocide product by Nalco

Company (EPA Co. No. 1706) ("Nalco"), between EPA's Office Of Pesticide Programs and

Buckman Laboratories International, Inc. (EPA Co. No. 1448) ("Buckman"). This request

includes, but is not limited to, any petitions, correspondence or other communications between

EPA and Buckman concerning any Nalco products described as ammonium-based or urea-based.

Please contact me at (202) 789-6128 when the response is ready so that I can arrange to

have the materials picked up from EPA. I authorize costs up to $150 associated with copy and

review time to prepare this request. Please let me know if the costs will exceed this amount.

Washington, D.C. Maryland New York Massachusetts New Jersey Texas California

Sincerely,

Megan B. Haebler

Paralegal
1

MAMMALS of

BALCONES CANYONLANDS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE

Revised: September 22, 2008

Taxonomy and sequence follow Davis and Schmidly (1994).

Virginia Opossum Didelphis virginiana Common

[Bats Order Chiroptera Poorly documented]

[Cave Myotis Myotis velifer Hypothetical]

[Eastern Pipistrelle Pipistrellus subflavus Hypothetical]

Eastern RedBat Lasiurus borealis Fairly common

[Hoary Bat Lasiurus cinereus Hypothetical]

[EveningBat Nycticeius humeralis Hypothetical]

Mexican Free-tailed Bat Tadarida brasiliensis Presumed common

Nine-banded Armadillo Dasypus novemcinctus Common

[Desert Cottontail Sylvilagus audubonii Hypothetical]

Eastern Cottontail Sylvilagusfloridanus Abundant

Black-tailed Jackrabbit Lepus californicus Common

Rock Squirrel Spermophilus variegatus Fairly common

Eastern FoxSquirrel Sciurus niger Fairly common

American Beaver Castor canadensis Rare

[Mice and Rats Family Muridae Poorly documented]

Texas Mouse Peromyscus attwateri Probably common

White-footed Mouse Peromyscusleucopus Probably common

Deer Mouse Peromyscus maniculatus Fairly common

White-ankled Mouse Peromyscus pectoralis Probably fairly common

Northern Pygmy Mouse Baiomys taylori Fairly common

Hispid Cotton Rat Sigmodon hispidus Abundant

Eastern Wood Rat Neotoma floridana Uncommon, local

[House Mouse Mus musculus Hypothetical]

Porcupine Erethizon dorsatum Rare resident or transient

Nutria Myocastor coypus Uncommon

Coyote Canis latrans Fairly common

Red Fox Vulpes vulpes Apparently rare

Common Gray Fox Urocyon cinereoargenteus Fairly common

Ringtail Bassariscus astutus Fairly common

Common Raccoon Procyon lotor Abundant

Striped Skunk Mephitis mephitis Common

Common Hognose Skunk Conepatus mesoleucus Rare
2

Feral Cat Felis catus Fairly common

Mountain Lion Felis concolor Rare

Bobcat Lynx rufus Rare

Feral Pig Susscrofa Abundant

Collared Peccary (“Javelina”) Tayassu tajacu Very rare (extirpated?)

Axis Deer Cervis axis Introduced, rare

White-tailed Deer Odocoileus virginianus Common

[Pronghorn Antilocapra americana Hypothetical, historical]

[Bison Bos bison Hypothetical, historical]

Barbary Sheep Ammotraguslervia Introduced, rare

Blackbuck Antilope cervicapra Uncommon, feral/escapee

References

Davis, W. B. and D. J. Schmidly. 1994. TheMammals of Texas. Texas Parks &Wildlife Dept.,

Austin.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeCustomer SupportTrainingDetails

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# LDRT - Logistics Data Research Techniques

## Course Description

A review of the NSN Total Item Record data elements and hands on use of the research tools available to find required data elements to include FED LOG, WebFLIS and more. 16 Hour Course.

## Target Audience

Retail level logisticians and supply support personnel who wish to gain an understanding of the FLIS.

## Delivery Methods

Classroom Instruction (16 hours)Webinar (One 3 hour block each day, for two days)

## Contact us

For questions or additional interest in Training.

**Scheduling Program Manager**Commercial/Federal Telecommunication System (FTS): **  269-961-4829DSN: **  312-661-4829**J31CT Training Office Fax Line**Commercial/Federal Telecommunications System (FTS)/FAX: **  269-961-5035DSN: **  312-661-5035E-mail: **  dla.tng@dla.mil

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Logistics Data Research TechniquesLDRT
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Roland SMITH.

No. 61039.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 22, 1978.

*94Robert J. Zibilich, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Louise S. Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

On November 21, 1974, the Orleans Parish Grand Jury indicted defendant Roland Smith for the crime of aggravated rape, a violation of La.R.S. 14:42. On May 4, 1976, he was tried before a twelve person jury and found guilty as charged. Thereafter, the trial court sentenced defendant .to death, a penalty then required by law for the crime of aggravated rape. On appeal, defendant urges two assignments of error.1

We have reviewed defendant’s assignments of error and found them to be without merit. However, we note, *ex proprio motu,*under the authority of Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 920(2), that the death penalty imposed is illegal. Defendant was sentenced prior to the decision of *Selman v. Louisiana,*428 U.S. 906, 96 S.Ct. 3214, 49 L.Ed.2d 1212 (1976), declaring Louisiana’s mandatory death sentence for aggravated rape Unconstitutional. In accordance with that decision, this Court has vacated death sentences in aggravated rape cases but, in the absence of other reversible error, remanded the cases to the trial court for resentencing of the accused to the most serious penalty provided for a lesser included offense at the time of the crime. *State v. Volson,*352 So.2d 1293 (La.1977); *State v. Noble,*342 So.2d 170 (La.1977); *State v. Sledge,*340 So.2d 205 (La.1976).

At the time the present offense was committed (November 9, 1974), attempted aggravated rape was punishable by imprisonment at hard labor for not more than twenty years, while the crime of simple rape carried a penalty of imprisonment for not less than one nor more than twenty years. Therefore, the appropriate sentence in this case is imprisonment at hard labor for twenty years.

Accordingly, defendant’s conviction is affirmed, but his sentence is reversed and set aside. The case is remanded for resentenc-ing in accordance with law.

1

. Four additional assignments of error were neither briefed not argued and are therefore considered to have been abandoned. *State v. Russell,*352 So.2d 1289 (La.1977).
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Huey H. REEVES v. Ross MAGGIO, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 60761.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1977.

In re: Huey H. Reeves applying for writ of habeas corpus and other remedial writs.

Application denied, for the reasons stated in the trial judge’s opinion.
Compensation Agreement



 Exhibit 10.5 
 June 30, 2006 
 Alfred S. Chuang 
 Chairman of the
Board, 
 Chief Executive Officer and President 
 Dear Alfred:

 The purpose of this letter is to summarize the compensation and other benefits recommended by the Compensation Committee
and approved by the Board of Directors in connection with your continued employment as Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of BEA Systems, Inc. Except at otherwise noted, these items apply to the Company’s 2007 fiscal
year, beginning February 1, 2006. These items will be paid and/or awarded consistent with the Company’s usual and customary practices, procedures and approval requirements: 
  

	 	•	 	 Cash Compensation 



	 	o	Base Salary: $900,000, effective May 1, 2006; 


	 	o	Target Bonus: 100% of base salary; 


	 	o	Special Performance Bonus for FY2006 performance: $200,000.  


	 	•	 	 Equity Compensation  



	 	o	 Options: 700,000 to be granted in accordance with the Company’s 1997 Stock Incentive Plan and standard form of option agreement;




	 	o	 Restricted Stock Units: 233,000 shares to be granted in accordance with the Company’s 1997 Stock Incentive Plan and standard form of restricted stock unit
agreement, with 25% annual vesting.  



	 	•	 	 Perquisites 



	 	o	Reimbursement for Tax/Financial/Estate Planning Assistance: Up to $10,000; 


	 	o	Reimbursement for Air Travel: Business-related travel only, consistent with Company policy; 


	 	o	 Use of Company Car/Driver and Related Expenses: For business and/or personal use consistent with past practices, provided that you will be responsible for all
tax consequences resulting from any imputed income attributable to personal use in accordance with applicable tax rules; 



	 	o	Physical Exam: Consistent with past practices. 









	 	•	 	 Other Benefits (e.g., medical, dental, 401(k), vacation, etc.): You will be permitted to participate in the Company’s standard executive and employee
benefit plans and programs. 



	 	•	 	 At-Will Employment: Your employment is and will continue to be “at-will.” As a result, in the event your employment terminates for any reason,
you will not be entitled to any severance, accelerated vesting or other benefits, except as may be provided under the Company’s existing plans and programs or as agreed to at the time. However, your Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of
November 2003 remains in effect and is not changed or modified by this letter. 


         If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. 
 Very truly yours, 
 BEA Systems, Inc. 
 ____________________________________ 
 Richard T. Schlosberg 
 Chairman, Compensation Committee 
 Board of Directors 
 I understand and agree to the terms outlined in this letter. 
                                       
                                        
                    Alfred S. Chuang 
             Date
#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

No. 8123.

Entry Nos. 703544; 774575; 835840.

(Decided June 3, 1952)

*Sharretts, Hillis & Paley (Howard C. Carter*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General,.for the defendant.

Kao, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, that the market value or the price, at the time of exportation to the United States of the earthenware articles covered by the Appeals to reappraisement enumerated on schedule “A” hereto attached and made part hereof, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and *670expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States, was in each instance the appraised value less the amount added to meet advances made by the Appraiser in similar cases and that there is no foreign value.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that these appeals to re-appraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the earthenware articles here involved, and that such value in each instance was the appraised value, less the amount added to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases.

Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### Condry, Appellant, *v.*Wilkes-Barre & Wyoming Valley Traction Company.

*Negligence*— Street *railways*— Fright *of horses*— Speed *of car*— Non-*suit.*

In an action against a street railway company to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as a result of the frightening of plaintiff’s horses by an electric car, a nonsuit is properly entered, where it appears from the testimony of plaintiff’s witnesses that the car was running at the usual speed and not more than ten to fifteen miles an hour between cross streets, and it is not shown that the speed of the car contributed in any way to the accident.

*271Argued April 12, 1910.

May 16, 1910:

Appeal, No. 79, Jan. T., 1910, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Luzerne Co., Oct. T., 1906, No. 929, refusing to take off nonsuit in case of Michael Condry v. The Wilkes-Barre & Wyoming Valley Traction Company.

Before Fell, C. J., Brown, Mestrezat, Potter and Elkin, JJ.

Affirmed.

Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Evans, P. J., specially presiding.

The court entered a compulsory nonsuit which it subsequently refused to take off.

*Error assigned*was order refusing to take off nonsuit.

*James L.*Lenahan, for appellant.

*Paul Bedford,*with him *Frank A. McGuigan*and *John T. Lenahan,*for appellee.

Per Curiam,

While the plaintiff’s horses were standing at the side of a city street they were frightened by an electric car which approached from the direction in which they were facing. When the car was about 150 feet from them they suddenly turned across the street in front of it and ran ahead of it until the wagon collided with a telegraph pole. The negligence alleged in the plaintiff’s statement was that the car was run at an excessively high rate of speed. This was not shown. The plaintiff’s witnesses testified that the car was running at the usual speed and the highest estimate of its speed was from ten to fifteen miles an hour between cross streets. Nor was it shown that the speed of the car contributed in any way to the accident. The burden of proof of negligence was on the plaintiff and as none was shown, a nonsuit was properly entered.

The judgment is affirmed.
[CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]

Toxicity Information

[

]
[CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]

RTECS Record for NCS-2

L1 ANSWER 1 of 1 RTECS COPYRIGHT 2012 U.S. GOVERNMENT on STN

CAS Registry Number (RN): [ ] RTECS

RTECS Number (RTN): [ ]

Molecular Formula (MF): [ ]

Formula Weight (FW): [

Chemical Name (CN): [

Class Identifier (CI):

Entry/Update Date (DATE): Dec 1997

Character Count: 504

TOXICITY DATA (TOX):

Route |Organism| Dose | Source

RTE | ORGN | DOSE | SO

===============+========+=======+==========

intraperitoneal|Mouse |LD >500|CBCCT*

| |mg/kg |6,147,1954

TOXICITY DATA REFERENCES:

CBCCT* "Summary Tables of Biological Tests," National Research Council

Chemical-Biological Coordination Center. (National Academy of Science

Library,

2101 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20418)
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report
of Central Jersey Bancorp (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Anthony Giordano, III, Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of the
Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of ss.13(a) or 15(d) of
         the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. ss.78m or 78o(d), and,

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Dated:  April 30, 2007                  /s/ Anthony Giordano, III
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Anthony Giordano, III
                                      Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
                                      Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43525-43526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21484]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 1517-008 Utah]


Monroe City Corporation; Notice of Availability of Final 
Environmental Assessment

August 8, 1997.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 F.R. 47897), the Office 
of Hydroelectric Licensing has reviewed the application for a new 
license for the existing Upper Monroe Hydroelectric Project, and has 
prepared a Final

[[Page 43526]]

Environmental Assessment (FEA) for the project. The project, which is 
located near Monroe City, in Sevier, County, Utah, diverts water from 
three tributaries of Monroe Creek: Shingle Creek, First Lefthand Fork 
of Monroe Creek, and Serviceberry Creek.
    In the FEA, the Commission's staff has analyzed the potential 
environmental impacts of the project and has concluded that approval of 
the project, with appropriate environmental protective measures, would 
not constitute a major federal action that would significantly affect 
the quality of the human environment.
    Copies of the FEA are available for review in the Public Reference 
Branch, Room 2A, of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21484 Filed 8-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# DLA Aviation employee shares his Native American Heritage through video. 

/ Published Nov. 23, 2016
RICHMOND, Va., 
November is Native American Heritage Month. It is a time to celebrate American Indian culture and contributions. 

Timothy Abdella, a Defense Logistics Agency Aviation quality assurance specialist, shares the story of his family's rich Yankton Sioux heritage and the obstacles they have overcome.

Listen to his story on DLA’s Youtube channel.

For information about National Native American Heritage Month, visit the following sites:

Society of American Indian Government Employees

American Indian Science & Engineering Society (AISES) 

Library of Congress