alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 160 (Tuesday, August 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21928]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-682-000]


Nautilus Pipeline Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

August 13, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 5, 1997, Nautilus Pipeline Company, 
L.L.C. (Nautilus), 200 North Dairy Ashford, Houston, Texas 77079, filed 
in Docket No. CP97-682-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 
157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 
CFR 157.205 and 157.212) for authorization to establish additional 
delivery points in St. Mary Parish, Louisiana, under Nautilus' blanket 
certificate issued in Docket No. CP96-792-000 pursuant to Section 7 of 
the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request that is 
on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Specifically, Nautilus proposes to establish additional delivery 
points to eight interstate and intrastate natural gas pipelines from 
the Nautilus pipeline near the outlet of the Exxon Company U.S.A., 
Inc.'s Garden City Gas Processing Plant in St. Mary Parish, Louisiana. 
The eight pipelines for which new delivery points are proposed are:

(1) Koch Gateway Pipeline Company
(2) Louisiana Intrastate Gas Company
(3) Arcadian Pipeline System
(4) Cypress Gas Pipeline Company
(5) Texas Gas Pipeline Company
(6) ANR Pipeline Company
(7) Columbia Gulf Transmission Company
(8) Southern Natural Gas Company

    Nautilus states that the new delivery points would have no impact 
on its authorized rates, and that between 150 to 450 MMcf/day of 
natural gas can be delivered to the eight pipelines at the new delivery 
points.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21928 Filed 8-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1316 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1316

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To authorize the Small Business Administration to provide emergency 
     relief to shellfish growers affected by toxic red tide losses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Red Tide Emergency Relief Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that--
            (1) shellfish growers, known as ``aquaculturists'', from 
        the Schoodic Peninsula in Maine to Buzzards Bay in 
        Massachusetts have suffered substantial economic injury due to 
        the worst occurrence of toxic algae bloom, known as ``Red 
        Tide'', along the New England Coast since 1972;
            (2) toxins produced by the Red Tide algae contaminate 
        shellfish like clams and mussels, making them unsafe for people 
        and animals to eat, forcing the extended closure of shellfish 
        beds along contaminated areas.
            (3) hundreds of shellfish growers have been affected by the 
        Red Tide, and losses industrywide are estimated at $3 million a 
        week; and
            (4) shellfish growers are currently considered to be 
        agricultural enterprises, and are therefore ineligible for 
        economic injury disaster loans available to other small 
        business concerns through the Small Business Administration;
            (5) shellfish growers are only eligible for emergency loans 
        through the Farm Service Agency of the Department of 
        Agriculture under limited circumstances;
            (6) the Small Business Act should be amended to make 
        shellfish growers eligible for emergency small business 
        assistance, as a complement to assistance otherwise offered 
        through Federal programs.

SEC. 3. AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE DISASTER ASSISTANCE TO AQUACULTURE 
              ENTERPRISES.

    Section 18(b)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 647(b)(1)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``aquaculture,''; and
            (2) by inserting before the semicolon at the end ``, other 
        than aquaculture''.

            Passed the Senate June 27, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1316

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To authorize the Small Business Administration to provide emergency 
     relief to shellfish growers affected by toxic red tide losses.
```
UNITED STATES
        SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C.
        20549

---

# FORM 8-K

**CURRENT
        REPORT**
         Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of
        1934

Date of Report:
        September 24, 2007

MIDDLESEX WATER
COMPANY(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)

|                                                                     |               |                                      
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------
|NEW JERSEY                                                           | 0-422         | 22-1114430                           
|(State or other jurisdiction ofCommission incorporationorganization) | (File Number) | (I.R.S.Employer orIdentification No.)
|                                                                     |               |                                      

1500 RONSON ROAD, P.O. BOX 1500,
ISELIN, NEW JERSEY 08830(Address of principal executive offices,
including zip code)

(732)-634-1500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Check the appropriate box below if
        the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the
        registrant under any of the following provisions:

 ̈Written communications pursuant
to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

 ̈Soliciting material pursuant to
Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

 ̈Pre-commencement communications
pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)

 ̈Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the  Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))



---

# Item. 8.01. Other
        Events

On September 20, 2007, Dennis Doll,
        President of Middlesex Water Company (NASDAQ: MSEX) and Vice President/CFO Bruce
        O’Conner gave a presentation to the Philadelphia Securities Association in
        Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. This presentation was accompanied by a power point presentation
        that outlined the Company’s traditional role, future growth projections and strategy
        for expanding capabilities. A copy of the slide show is attached as EXHIBIT 99.1 hereto and
        incorporated by references herein. An archive of the slide presentation will be made
        available through Middlesex Water’s website located at
        www.middlesexwater.com.

# Item 9.01. Financial
        Statements and Exhibits

(d)     99.1
        Copy of Presentation on September 20, 2007

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
        its behalf of the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

MIDDLESEX WATER
        COMPANY(Registrant)

By: s/Kenneth J.
        QuinnKenneth J.
        QuinnVice
        President, General Counsel,
       Secretary and Treasurer

Dated: September 24,
        2007

---

EXHIBIT INDEX

99.1 Copy of Slide
        Presentation made on September 20, 2007

---
****Scheduled Agency Reports and Summaries**USDA Economics and Statistics System March 1998**
# San Joaquin’s Central Receiving Team awarded DLA Director’s Strategic Goals Award

/ Published Nov. 22, 2017
TRACY, Calif., DLA Distribution San Joaquin, California’s, Central Receiving Team has been awarded the DLA Director’s Strategic Goals Award for fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017. 
The Central Receiving Team’s main purpose is to verify and induct over 97 percent of material arriving at the distribution center, ensuring the utmost quality and accuracy while maintaining a 24-hour new procurement, 48-hour redistribution order, 48-hour stock transfer order and 120-hour return metric.  Their efforts focused on improving all processes to decrease material induction time, and increase overall production in order to make more material visible and available to customers. 

The team introduced numerous continuous process improvements to bolster overall efficiencies throughout each portion of the receiving process.  In the Less Than Truckload section, the team aggressively streamlined the offload and tally process, which decreased material offload times by 15 percent and allowed all staged items to be prepared prior to induction, thereby increasing the LTL induction rate by 15 percent.  

The Small Parcel section coordinated with UPS to consolidate daily ground deliveries, which decreased handling of material and facilitated consolidation of previously separated single national stock numbers into multiple cartons.  This improvement decreased the volume of receipts that formerly required several single inductions to complete the PMR and allowed efficient single inductions to occur. 

All CPI actions aided the Central Receiving Team immeasurably during an unexpected and lengthy surge of workload from June 2017 through August 2017.  The unexpected volume of material was well outside Fiscal Year 17 projections, and well above onboard staffing levels.  A total of 68,351 lines of material arrived during this period, which equated to 23 percent additional workload.  Due to the CPIs and efforts of the Central Receiving Team, all metrics were maintained through this unprecedented surge.  

“The Central Receiving’s team steadfast focus resulted in the successful induction of 68,144 lines, an additional 9,835 lines above projections.  The induction of these 9,835 lines breaks down to 3,026 man hours that was absorbed by the professional and goal driven Central Receiving Team at San Joaquin,” said DLA Distribution San Joaquin commander Marine Col. Andre Harrell. “It is a pleasure to nominate the Central Receiving Team for this distinctive award.  They are truly deserving of this recognition.”
-  Skip to page content 
    -  Skip to text-only view 
    -  Skip to search in this text
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2282]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or To Acquire Companies That Are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation      Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire 
or control voting securities or assets of a company that engages either 
directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking 
activity that is listed in Sec.  225.25 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.25) 
or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to 
banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise 
noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. Once the notice has been accepted for processing, it will 
also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the 
question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 
of the BHC Act, including whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices'' (12 U.S.C. 1843). Any request for a hearing 
on this question must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a 
written presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, 
identifying specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, 
summarizing the evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and 
indicating how the party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of 
the proposal.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than February 13, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Republic Bancshares, Inc., St. Petersburg, Florida; to acquire 
Firstate Financial, F.A., Orlando, Florida, and thereby engage in 
operating a savings association, pursuant to Sec.  225.25(b)(9) of the 
Board's Regulation Y. The proposed activity will be conducted 
throughout the State of Florida.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 24, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-2282 Filed 1-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
#### LION OIL COMPANY, Inc., Appellant, v. TAMARAC LAKES, INC., a Florida corporation, and Robert Reynolds d/b/a Bay To Bay Dredging, Appellees.

No. 577.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 23, 1970.

Kenneth G. Stevens, of Dale & Stevens, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

No appearance for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, Lion Oil Company, Inc., appeals from a final judgment for attorney’s fees entered against it and in favor of defendant, Tamarac Lakes, Inc. We affirm.

This action arose when plaintiff filed suit on 5 August 1965 to foreclose a mechanic’s lien against the defendant.

On 26 August 1965 the defendant, Ta-marac Lakes, filed a motion to dismiss upon which no ruling was entered. On 29 September 1965 plaintiff (pursuant to F.R. *21C.P. 1.35(a) (1), 1965) 1 [now 30 F.S.A. Rule 1.420] filed a notice of dismissal as to Tamarac Lakes.

On 8 October 1965 the lower court transferred the cause to the law side of the docket and further transferred it to the court of record.

After defendant moved for an order awarding it attorney’s fees the court (in the judgment appealed from) granted same in the amount of $100.00 on 27 October 1965.2

By its order of 8 October the lower court transferred this action to another court. This action was ineffectual as to defendant because plaintiff’s notice of dismissal (acquiesced to in the October 8 order) removed defendant as a party. The court could have retained the power to grant reasonable attorney’s fees to defendant (see Section 84.291, F.S.1965) F.S.A., and in fact the effect of the order herein and the court’s subsequent conduct indicates this to be the case. We therefore affirm the judgment appealed from.

Affirmed.

McCAIN, REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.

1

. Which provided:

> “Subject to the provisions hereof, an action may be dismissed by the plaintiff *without order of court*(i) by filing a notice of dismissal at any time before service by the adverse party of an answer or of a motion for summary judgment or decree, whichever first occurs, or (ii) by filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared in the action. Unless otherwise stated in the notice of dismissal or stipulation, the dismissal shall be without prejudice, except that a dismissal shall operate as an adjudication upon the merits when filed by a plaintiff who has once dismissed in any court of this State an action based on or including the same claim.” (Emphasis added.)

It should be noted that under the rule in effect at the date pertinent herein a plaintiff was not entitled to take a voluntary nonsuit as a matter of right but rather this was a discretionary matter left to the trial judge. See Meyer v. Contemporary Broadcasting Company, Fla.App.1968, 207 So.2d 325.

2

. Pursuant to Section 84.291, F.S.1965, F.S.A., defendant as the prevailing party in this action to enforce a lien was entitled to recover a reasonable fee for the services of his attorney.
#### Wayne D. JOINER d/b/a Joiner Real Estate v. Lavada LOCKART.

No. 60941.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1977.

In re: Lavada Lockart applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 350 So.2d 199.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1450 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1450

              To suspend temporarily the duty on Aspirin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 2005

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To suspend temporarily the duty on Aspirin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ASPIRIN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.70      O-Acetylsalicylic   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         acid                                                               31/2009
                         (Aspirin)(CAS No.
                         50-78-2)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2918.22.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# DLA group earns award for improving financial process

By Dianne Ryder

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

comptrollercomptrollersawardpayfinancialfinance
EXHIBIT 32

 Certifications Required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned  hereby  certifies  in his or her  capacity as an officer of PennFed
Financial  Services,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  that the  Quarterly  Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended  December 31, 2006 fully complies with
the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information  contained in such report fairly presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods presented in the financial  statements included in
such report.




                                    By:  /s/ Joseph L. LaMonica
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Joseph L. LaMonica
                                         President and Chief
                                         Executive Officer

                                         Date: February 9, 2007


                                    By:  /s/ Claire M. Chadwick
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Claire M. Chadwick
                                         Senior Executive Vice President,
                                         Chief Financial Officer and Controller

                                         Date: February 9, 2007


                                       67
facid Location type (U=UTM, L=lat/lon) Latitude

(decimal) or UTM Easting (m) Longitude

(decimal) or UTM Northing (m) UTM

zoneElevation (m) 21141NEIKY2114100 L 36.952083 -86.931980 18093NEI3IN18093Rec L 38.923699 -86.514150Type of receptor (P=house, school, etc.; B=boundary; M=monitor) Hill Height P P