alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Keeping the cold out

/ Published Dec. 28, 2016
EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE, Alaska, When something is always there, people can tend to take it for granted. When a light switch is turned on or the thermostat is adjusted heat or power are the expected outcome.The Airmen at the Central Heat and Power Plant are a big part of the reason buildings on base stay warm during the holiday season, despite the below-freezing temperatures outside.“We produce all of the steam and electricity for the base,” said Phillip Hammond, the 354th Civil Engineer Squadron CHPP superintendent. “It’s a non-stop operation; we’re here every day to make sure the base never runs out of steam or power.”Built in the early 1950s, the CHPP has been around longer than Alaska has been a state. Although it’s an older facility, it isn’t outdated.“Over the years there have been a few upgrades,” said Hammond. “For instance, we installed new boilers, which made the process more efficient.”During the winter in Interior Alaska heat and power are two very important things, which is why the Airmen at the CHPP do what they can to make sure Eielson always has power.“We have a pretty high rating because we don’t have frequent outages,” said Eric Girad the 354th CES CHPP operation supervisor. “We’re able to prevent a lot of outages by being proactive and preparing for contingencies.”The Alaskan Interior also presents some difficulties when it comes to heat and power, but the CHPP allows the Air Force to work around those and save money.“In the Interior there is no natural gas available,” said Girad. “Because of that, coal is the most reliable and financially sound way to produce heat and power for the base.”In the winter, whether some one turns up the heat or plugs in their car, the Airmen at the CHPP are responsible for the end results; continued and sustained heat and power.“The CHPP is the heartbeat of the base,” said Hammond. “And we’re here 24 hours a day, seven days a week to make sure it doesn’t skip a beat.”*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Eielson Air Force Base website.*
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1545 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1545

To withdraw the Los Padres National Forest in California from location, 
      entry, and patent under mining laws, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 28, 2005

 Mrs. Boxer (for herself and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To withdraw the Los Padres National Forest in California from location, 
      entry, and patent under mining laws, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WITHDRAWAL OF LOS PADRES NATIONAL FOREST, CALIFORNIA, FROM 
              MINING LAWS.

    Subject to valid existing rights, the Los Padres National Forest in 
California is hereby withdrawn from--
            (1) all forms of entry, appropriation, and disposal under 
        the public land laws;
            (2) location, entry, and patent under the mining laws; and
            (3) operation of the mineral leasing, mineral materials, 
        and geothermal leasing laws.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1509 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 471
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1509

                          [Report No. 109-263]

To amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to add non-human primates to 
             the definition of prohibited wildlife species.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 27, 2005

 Mr. Jeffords (for himself, Mr. Chafee, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Lautenberg, 
  Mr. Ensign, Mr. Vitter, and Mr. Menendez) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

                             June 19, 2006

               Reported by Mr. Inhofe, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to add non-human primates to 
             the definition of prohibited wildlife species.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Captive Primate Safety Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. ADDITION OF NON-HUMAN PRIMATES TO THE DEFINITION OF PROHIBITED 
              WILDLIFE SPECIES.

    Section 2(g) of the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 (16 U.S.C. 
3371(g)) is amended by inserting ``or any non-human primate'' before 
the period at the end.
                                                       Calendar No. 471

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1509

                          [Report No. 109-263]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to add non-human primates to 
             the definition of prohibited wildlife species.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 19, 2006

                       Reported without amendment
```
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in RegistrationStatement No. 333-158753 of Phazar Corp on form S-3 and Registration StatementNo. 333-158798 on form S-8 of Phazar Corp. of our reports dated August 19, 2010,related to our audit of the consolidated financial statements of Phazar Corp.as of May 31, 2010 and 2009, and for the years then ended, which report is includedin the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Phazar Corp. for the year ended May 31,2010. 

 

 

WEAVER AND TIDWELL, L.L.P. 

 

Fort Worth, Texas

August 19, 2010
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Thomas C. JOYNER, Jr. v. C. Paul PHELPS, Warden, Dept. of Corrections, State of Louisiana.

No. 60489.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 1977.

In re: Thomas C. Joyner, Jr., applying for supervisory writs.

Writ denied. As to issue 1: The trial court was in error in refusing to permit the Kaese search warrant and affidavit into evidence. The relator was adversely affected and had standing to contest the validity of the Kaese search. La.Const. Art. 1, Sec. 5 (1974); *State v. Culotta,*343 So.2d 977 (La.1976); *State v. Herbert,*351 So.2d 434 (La.1977) (docket No. 58,726, opinion on rehearing rendered October 10, 1977). However, on examining the affidavit and *188warrant, which are attached to the proceedings, we find that the affidavit adequately establishes probable cause for the search. As to issue 2: We are unable to find error in the trial court’s holding that the uncon-tradicted testimony of the prosecutor and of Kaese’s attorney establishes that no plea bargain was entered into before Kaese’s testimony at the trial (or to date), and that the Kaese bargaining discussions commenced only after the relator was convicted.

SUMMERS, J.,

is of the opinion writ should be denied, but does not agree that the trial judge was in error in refusing to permit the Kaese search.

DIXON, J.,

is of the opinion that the affidavit did not connect Kaese with a drug transaction and did not set out probable cause to support a search warrant to search Kaese’s apartment, and would grant.

CALOGERO, J., is of the opinion that the writ should be granted.

MARCUS, J.,

concurs in the denial of this writ. See my dissenting opinion in *State*v. *Herbert,*No. 58,726 (La. Oct. 10, 1977), 351 So.2d 434.
Exhibit 23(a)

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement of
NCT  Group,  Inc.  on Form  S-1  (File  Nos.  333-64967,  333-43387,  333-82359,
333-87757,  333-35210,  333-47084  and  333-60574)  and on Form S-8  (File  Nos.
333-11213 and 333-47956) of our report, which includes an explanatory  paragraph
about the existence of substantial  doubt  concerning  the Company's  ability to
continue  as a going  concern,  dated  April  10,  2002,  on our  audits  of the
consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 2001
which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We also consent to the reference to our firm as experts in the Registration
Statement on Form S-1.

/s/ RICHARD A. EISNER & COMPANY, LLP
------------------------------------
    Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP


New York, New York
April 24, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL MCMILLAN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 67 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of August, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44282-44283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22088]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory 
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will 
be open to the public.
    Name of Committee: Blood Products Advisory Committee.
    General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and 
recommendations to the agency on FDA regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on September 18, 1997, 8 
a.m. to 5:30 p.m., and September 19, 1997, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Location: Quality Suites Hotel, Potomac Rooms I, II, and III, Three 
Research Ct. (off Shady Grove Rd.), Rockville, MD.
    Contact Person: Linda A. Smallwood, Center for Biologics Evaluation 
and Research (HFM-350), Food and Drug Administration, 1401 Rockville 
Pike, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-827-3514, or FDA Advisory Committee 
Information

[[Page 44283]]

Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the Washington, DC area), code 
12388. Please call the Information Line for up-to-date information on 
this meeting.
    Agenda: On the morning of September 18, 1997, the committee will 
discuss the topic of inadvertent contamination of plasma. In the 
afternoon, the committee will hear a proposal for management of plasma 
and plasma donors presented by the International Plasma Products 
Industry Association. On September 19, 1997, the committee will discuss 
the topic of cryoprecipitate-depleted plasma.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or 
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee. 
Written submissions may be made to the contact person by September 10, 
1997. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled between 
approximately 11 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. and 2 p.m. and 3 p.m. on September 
18, 1997. Time allotted for each presentation may be limited. Those 
desiring to make formal oral presentations should notify the contact 
person before September 10, 1997, and submit a brief statement of the 
general nature of the evidence or arguments they wish to present, the 
names and addresses of proposed participants, and an indication of the 
approximate time requested to make their presentation.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: August 14, 1997.
Michael A. Friedman,
Deputy Commissioner for Operations.
[FR Doc. 97-22088 Filed 8-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Global Earth Energy, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending February 28, 2010, I, Sydney A. Harland, Chief Executive Officer of Global Earth Energy, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending February 28, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending February 28, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global Earth Energy, Inc.

Dated: April 19, 2010.

/s/ Sydney A. Harland

Sydney A. Harlan

Chief Executive Officer

Global Earth Energy, Inc.
No. 00-6758.

#### Jackson *v.*Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
32.1






CERTIFICATION
OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350






In
connection with this Quarterly Report of Global Earth Energy, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endingFebruary 28,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sydney A. Harland, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1. Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endingFebruary 28,
2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending February 28, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Global Earth Energy,
Inc.






Date: April
14, 2009






/s/
Sydney A. Harland


Sydney A.
Harland


Chief
Executive Officer
No. 9641.

#### Green et al., Partners, *v.*Miller et al.

(Decided June 29, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Columbiana county.

*Messrs. Carey &*Mullins, for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Taylor é Harris,*for defendants in error.

Judgment reversed and judgment for plaintiffs in error.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Spectrum Realty, Inc.(the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
William J. Carden, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated
      and results of operations of the Company for the period
      indicated.





Dated:   November
11, 2010





/s/ William J. CardenWilliam
      J. CardenPresident
      and Chief Executive
Officer
# DLA Distribution celebrates the Marines Corps 242nd birthday

/ Published Nov. 15, 2017
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., DLA Distribution employees gathered to wish a collective “Happy Birthday” to the U.S. Marines Corps Nov. 9, in honor of the services 242nd birthday. Paul Smith, DLA Distribution Current Operations served as the master of ceremonies for the event. 
Opening the celebration, Smith introduced Marine Corps Sgt. Suzanne E. Johnson who read the Marine Corps commandants birthday message. Following the reading, Smith asked everyone to stand and sing along to the Marines’ Hymn.

DLA Distribution chief of staff, Perry Knight, served as the guest of honor, thanking everyone for their attendance to the event before inviting all current and former Marines to the stage for a traditional cake cutting ceremony with a Mameluke sword, as a reminder that we are a band of warriors, committed to carrying the sword, so that our nation may live in peace.

DLA Distribution provides services to Marine customers at DLA Distribution Albany, Ga., and DLA Distribution Barstow, Calif. DLA Distribution Albany stocks a wide range of retail items used in support of the Marine Depot Maintenance Command. Items stored include vehicle data plates, weapon parts, nuts, bolts and washers. The Albany distribution center also performs kitting and inventories of the lineside stock items in support of the various production lines located within the local maintenance activity. DLA Distribution Barstow’s, Yermo Annex is home to the Industrial Support operation that provides receipt, storage, issue and delivery processes for the Yermo-based Marine Corps Maintenance Depot in Barstow. This operation delivers on a real-time demand schedule to support production lines, producing a variety of wheeled and track vehicles. With a hot, dry desert climate, Barstow is an ideal location for outdoor storage for large tactical vehicles and equipment. Among the major items stored outside are Tracked and Wheeled Vehicles, ship propellers and drive shafts, anchors and radar units.
|   | Exhibit 21.1 |
|--------|--------------|

 

AMERICAN PHYSICIANS SERVICE GROUP, INC.

 

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

 

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2006

 

APS Investment Services, Inc.

 

APS Financial, Inc.

 

APS Asset Management. Inc.

 

APS Insurance Services, Inc.

 

APS Facilities Management, Inc. dba APMC Insurance Services, Inc.

 

APSFM, Inc.

 

American Physicians Insurance Agency, Inc.

 

APSC, Inc.

 

APS Professional Liability Insurance Agency, Inc.

 

FMI Partners, Ltd.

 

American Physicians Management Consulting, Inc.

 

APMC Financial Services, Inc.

 

APS Capital Corporation
#### Donald S. CREWS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1726.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 27, 1977.

Jack R. Nageley, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arthur Joel Berger, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Donald Crews seeks reversal of his conviction for robbery following a jury trial and first urges as reversible error the denial of his motion for mistrial after the prosecution allegedly introduced evidence of another crime for which he was acquitted.

Defendant in the instant case was charged with the robbery of a 7-11 Store on July 18,1975 located in the same vicinity of a Lil’ General Store which was robbed at about the same time on the same date. Defendant was charged with the robbery of the Lil’ General Store and was acquitted. During his trial for the 7-11 Store robbery, the prosecutor asked Detective Cameron the following question:

> ******

> “Q Did you have occasion, sir, to become involved in the investigation of a robbery that occurred at the Lil’ General Store out on West Dixie Highway?

> “A Yes, sir.”

> ******

Defense counsel objected and moved for a mistrial. A sidebar conference was held at which the prosecutor explained that he meant to say 7-11 Store instead of Lil’ General Store and requested that he be allowed to reask the question, this time using 7-11 Store instead of Lil’ General Store. The motion for mistrial was denied and Detective Cameron was admonished by the trial judge not to mention anything in regard to the Lil’ General Store robbery. The prosecutor then questioned Detective Cameron:

> ******

> *211“Q (By Mr. Godwin) Let me ask you this question again: In the course of your official capacity, did you become involved in the investigation of a robbery in North Miami at a 7-11 Store?”

> sje s(: ijs * * *

The defendant contends that the above question indicated to the jury that he was involved in the robbery of the Lil’ General Store resulting in reversible error since he had been acquitted with respect to that robbery. We find this contention amounts to pure speculation or mere conjecture upon which reversible error cannot be predicated. See *Sullivan v. State,*303 So.2d 632 (Fla.1974); *Hutchins v. State,*334 So.2d 112 (Fla.3d DCA 1976). We conclude likewise on defendant’s same contention with regards to the isolated respective references of two other witnesses as to “two robberies” and “two stores”.

We also examined defendant’s second contention of insufficiency of the evidence and have determined that it is without merit in that an eyewitness to the robbery positively identified the defendant.

Affirmed.
254 La. 512

#### STATE of Louisiana v. William C. THOMPSON et al.

No. 50003.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 21, 1969.

In re State of Louisiana applying for writ of certiorari and stay order.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Rudolph F. Becker, Jr., Judge of the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 14th day of November, 1968, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondents through their attorneys shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

It is further ordered that, in the meantime and until the further orders of this court all proceedings against the relator in said Criminal District Court shall be stayed and suspended.

Writ granted with stay order.