alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# USASAC Commanding General and Command Sergeant Major visits DLA Distribution

/ Published Dec. 20, 2017
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., U.S. Army Security Assistance Command’s commanding general, Maj. Gen. Stephen Farmen, and Command Sgt. Major Gene Canada, visited DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, on Dec. 15.  Their day began with a command brief presented by Col. Brad Eungard, DDSP Commander, followed by a tour of facilities on the New Cumberland Depot.   
While not his first visit to New Cumberland, Pa., it was the first time Maj. Gen. Farmen toured the Eastern Distribution Center, the largest warehouse in the Department of Defense.  He visited the receiving, processing, storage, retrieval and out-loading operations, where he saw the supply chain in action.  The tour included the organization’s key locations, including the Consolidation and Containerization Point, the high-rise storage and retrieval system, and the air line of communication pallet build area. 

The next stop on the tour was to Building 89, which houses medical supplies, and processes Foreign Military Sales equipment for shipment.  During his visit there, Maj. Gen. Farmen presented awards to select DDSP’s Unit Materiel Fielding Point personnel for their dedicated support to the USASAC mission. 

The tour ended with a short walk through building 2012 (Transportation). 

Summarizing his visit, Maj. Gen. Farmen said he really appreciated the presentation, which he said was a great help to him.  “I don’t take it for granted the great support we get from you and the team of people that are real passionate coming in here and trying to make sure we deliver on time on target.”

“We all have important missions, but we’re only as good as all the other team of teams who support us,” said Maj. Gen. Farmen.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1547 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate 

copolymers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 28, 2005 

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain vinyl chloridevinyl acetate copolymers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN VINYL CHLORIDE-VINYL ACETATE CO4 POLYMERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.39.02 Vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate 

copolymers (CAS No. 9003– 

22–9) (provided for in subheading 3904.30.60) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 
2 

•S 1547 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### Walter PETERSON, Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-639.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 6, 1978.

Rehearing Denied July 14, 1978.

Groland, Brown & Huysman and James B. Matthews, Miami, for appellant.

Stuart L. Simon, County Atty. and Stephen P. Lee and John E. Finney, Asst. County Attys., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, NATHAN and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Cheney v. Dade County,*353 So.2d 623 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); and *Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River County,*342 So.2d 1047 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1312

AN ACT

To amend a provision relating to employees of the United

States assigned to, or employed by, an Indian tribe,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reducing Conflicts of

5 Interests in the Representation of Indian Tribes Act of

6 2005’’.
 †

2

S 1312 ES

1 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS.

2 Section 104 of the Indian Self-Determination and

3 Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450i) is amended by

4 striking subsection (j) and inserting the following:

5 ‘‘(j) ADDITIONAL EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS.—

6 ‘‘(1) DEFINITION OF TRIBAL EMPLOYEE.—In

7 this subsection, the term ‘tribal employee’, with re8 spect to an Indian tribal government, means an indi9 vidual acting under the day-to-day control or super10 vision of the Indian tribal government, unaffected by

11 the control or supervision of any independent con12 tractor, agency or organization, or intervening sov13 ereignty.

14 ‘‘(2) RIGHTS OF CERTAIN EMPLOYEES.—Not15 withstanding sections 205 and 207 of title 18,

16 United States Code, an officer or employee of the

17 United States assigned to an Indian tribe under sec18 tion 3372 of title 5, United States Code, or section

19 2072 of the Revised Statutes (25 U.S.C. 48), or an

20 individual that was formerly an officer or employee

21 of the United States and who is a tribal employee

22 or an elected or appointed official of an Indian tribe

23 carrying out an official duty of the tribal employee

24 or official may communicate with and appear before

25 any department, agency, court, or commission on be26 half of the Indian tribe on any matter, including any
†

3

S 1312 ES

1 matter in which the United States is a party or has

2 a direct and substantial interest.

3 ‘‘(3) NOTIFICATION OF INVOLVEMENT IN PEND4 ING MATTER.—An officer, employee, or former offi5 cer or employee described in paragraph (2) shall

6 submit to the head of each appropriate department,

7 agency, court, or commission, in writing, a notifica8 tion of any personal and substantial involvement the

9 officer, employee, or former officer or employee had

10 as an officer or employee of the United States with

11 respect to the pending matter.’’.

12 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

13 The effective date of the amendment made by this

14 Act shall be the date that is 1 year after the date of enact15 ment of this Act.

Passed the Senate December 16, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1312

AN ACT

To amend a provision relating to employees of the

Indian tribe, and for other purposes.United States assigned to, or employed by, an
#### Sydney M. NELSON and Donald C. Nelson, her husband, Appellants, v. WINTER PARK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, INC., etc., et al., Appellees.

Nos. 76-1627, 76-1628.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 12, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 19, 1977.

*92Dan H. Honeywell and Thomas W. Gibson of Billings, Frederick, Wooten & Honeywell, P.A., Orlando, for appellants.

Harry K. Anderson, Jr. and John A. Lek-lem of D’Aiuto, Anderson & Walker, Orlando, for appellee-Winter Park Memorial Hospital.

J. Richard Caldwell, Jr. of Pitts, Eubanks, Ross & Rumberger, Orlando, for appellees Rozier and Shelby Mutual Ins. Co.

PER CURIAM.

Upon due consideration of the briefs and record on appeal we are of the opinion that the cause of action giving rise to the entry of a summary judgment in favor of the defendants-appellees accrued *prior*to July 1, 1972, the effective date of the two-year statute of limitations (Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1973)) governing malpractice actions. See *Foley v. Morris,*339 So.2d 215 (FIa.1976); *Reinhardt v. Schwab,*343 So.2d 837 (Fla.1977). The plaintiffs-appellants’ cause of action was governed by the four-year statute of limitations,1 (Section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1973)) which was effective *until*July 1, 1972. *Foley v. Morris, supra.*

Accordingly, summary final judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.2

MAGER and LETTS, JJ., and MOUNTS, MARVIN U., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

1

. A review of the record reflects that the issue of the applicable statute of limitations was before the trial court, as reflected by the pleadings filed by the parties. (See transcript pp. 112, 133).

2

. Since the reversal was predicated upon the applicability of the then existing four-year statute of limitations, it is unnecessary for the court to reach any of the other points presented by the parties in this appeal.
Attachment 1 

McMeekin Dry Vacuum/Pressure Bottom Ash Handling System Summary Description and 

Block Diagram 
Project ID: 08395 

SCE&G - McMeekin Station

Dry Bottom Ash Handling System Description

Each boiler has its own bottom ash collection and combination vacuum/pressure conveying 

system rated at 13 tons per hour at an ash density of 59 lbs. per cubic foot. Ash is collected 

and stored in 5 refractory lined hoppers beneath each boiler. Each ash collection hopper 

has 2 pneumatically actuated “bomb bay” style discharge doors which open to discharge 

the bottom ash into single roll crushers located beneath each hopper. The crushers reduce 

the size of large clinkers so they can be conveyed by vacuum. Ash in the hoppers is cooled 

by FD fan air which is fed into the discharge door enclosure and passes through the doors 

into the hopper. The crushers discharge through a swing disc type gate which meters 

crushed ash into the vacuum conveying system, which takes the ash to a transfer station 

and filter/separator. Vacuum conveying air is filtered and mechanically exhausted by a 

motor driven vacuum exhauster. 

At the transfer station, ash which has been filtered out of the vacuum conveying air is 

collected and fed into a positive pressure pneumatic system and conveyed to an ash storage 

silo with 650 ton capacity. The conveying air is supplied by a motor driven pressure blower, 

and is discharged at the storage silo through a bin vent filter on the silo. For truck loading, 

the ash is conditioned in a pug mill, loaded into dump trucks by gravity, and hauled to the 

on-site landfill or to beneficial re-use. 
Hopper

Doors

Crusher

Ash Filter & 

Transfer Station

Ash 

Silo

Truck to Landfill or 

Beneficial Re-Use

Metering

Boiler

Vacuum 

Exhauster

Air 

Compressor

South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.

McMeekin Station Bottom Ash Block Flow Diagram

Vacuum Conveying

Positive Pressure Conveying

Project ID: 08395

FD Fan 

Air for

Cooling

FD Fan Ash Cooling Air
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 163 (Friday, August 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21970]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[MT-962-1430-00-CCAM]


Notice of Availability for the Cooke City Area Mineral Withdrawal 
Record of Decision; Montana

AGENCY: Forest Service, Agriculture; Bureau of Land Management, 
Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Record of Decision (ROD) on the final environmental impact 
statement (EIS) for the Cooke City Area Mineral Withdrawal is 
available. The ROD documents the selection of the Preferred 
Alternative, the mineral withdrawal of approximately 22,065 acres of 
Federal land, and provides background information and rationale for the 
decision. The ROD also documents the decision to amend the Custer and 
Gallatin Forest Plans to reflect the intent of the mineral withdrawal.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Thompson, BLM Co-Lead, or Larry 
Timchak, FS Co-Lead, CCAM, BLM Montana State Office, PO Box 36800, 
Billings, Montana 59107-6800, 406-255-0322.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Final EIS for the Cooke City Area 
Mineral Withdrawal was released and made available for a 30-day public 
availability period on July 11, 1997. The final EIS documents the 
effects of withdrawing from federal mineral location and entry 22,065 
acres of federal mineral estate near Cooke City, Montana. The mineral 
withdrawal would also apply to hardrock minerals acquired by the United 
States and managed as leasable minerals. The mineral withdrawal would 
be subject to review after 20 years. Forest plans for the Custer and 
Gallatin National Forests would be amended to reflect the intent of the 
mineral withdrawal. Unpatented mining claims with valid existing rights 
and private lands would not be affected. The decisions are not subject 
to administrative appeal or protest under Forest Service and BLM 
regulations.

    Dated: August 12, 1997.
James R. Lyons,
Under Secretary Natural Resources and Environment.

Bob Armstrong,
Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Lands and Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. 97-21970 Filed 8-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
# C_2023057EN.01000201.xml

| 16.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 14 February 2023

appointing a member of the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board

(2023/C 57/02)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Decision No 235/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008 establishing the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board (1), and in particular Article 3(4) thereof,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its decision of 19 December 2019 (2), the Council appointed Mr Priit POTISEPP as a member of the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board (the Board) for a term of office of three years starting on 23 December 2019. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its decision of 19 December 2019 (2), the Council appointed Mr Priit POTISEPP as a member of the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board (the Board) for a term of office of three years starting on 23 December 2019.

| (2) | The term of office of Mr Priit POTISEPP expired on 22 December 2022. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The term of office of Mr Priit POTISEPP expired on 22 December 2022.

| (3) | According to Article 3(4) of Decision No 235/2008/EC, the term of office of the members of the Board can be renewed once. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

According to Article 3(4) of Decision No 235/2008/EC, the term of office of the members of the Board can be renewed once.

| (4) | In order to ensure administrative continuity and to follow on seamlessly from his first term of office, the term of office of Mr Priit POTISEPP should be renewed without interruption and he should be appointed for a second term of office with effect from 23 December 2022. This Decision should therefore enter into force as a matter of urgency, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

In order to ensure administrative continuity and to follow on seamlessly from his first term of office, the term of office of Mr Priit POTISEPP should be renewed without interruption and he should be appointed for a second term of office with effect from 23 December 2022. This Decision should therefore enter into force as a matter of urgency,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Priit POTISEPP is hereby appointed as a member representing the Council in the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board for a second term of office of three years from 23 December 2022.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 23 December 2022.

Done at Brussels, 14 February 2023.

For the Council

The President

E. SVANTESSON

---

(1)  OJ L 73, 15.3.2008, p. 17.

1

(2)  Council Decision of 19 December 2019 appointing a member of the European Statistical Governance Advisory Board (OJ C 428, 20.12.2019, p. 5).

2

---
FAA Home
Airports
Resources
Series 150 Advisory Circulars (ACs) for Airport Projects

# AC 43.13-1B - Acceptable Methods, Techniques, and Practices - Aircraft Inspection and Repair [Large AC. This includes Change 1.]

- ShareShare
- 

- Facebook					Share on Facebook
- Twitter					Tweet on Twitter

## Document Information

- Number
- 43.13-1B
- Title
- Acceptable Methods, Techniques, and Practices - Aircraft Inspection and Repair [Large AC. This includes Change 1.]
- Status
- Active
- Date issued
- 1998-09-08
- Office of Primary Responsibility
- AFS-300
- Description
-  This advisory circular (AC) contains methods, techniques, and practices acceptable to the Administrator for the inspection and repair of nonpressurized areas of civil aircraft, only when there are no manufacturer repair or maintenance instructions. This data generally pertains to minor repairs. The repairs identified in this AC may only be used as a basis for FAA approval for major repairs. The repair data may also be used as approved data, and the AC chapter, page, and paragraph listed in block 8 of FAA form 337 when:  **a.**the user has determined that it is appropriate to the product being repaired;  **b.**it is directly applicable to the repair being made; and  **c.**it is not contrary to manufacturer’s data. 
- Content
-    -  Editorial Update AC 43.13-1B Full Document with Change 1  (PDF) 
  -  AC 43.13-1B Full Document with Change 1  (PDF) 

## View All

      - Current Series 150 ACs
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs
      - Draft Series 150 ACs
      - Advisory Circulars

## Export All

      - Current Series 150 ACs  (CSV)
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs  (CSV)

## Top Requests

      - AC 150/5300-13B, Airport Design
      - AC 150/5320-6G, Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation
      - AC 150/5370-10H, Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports
      - AC 150/5340-1M, Standards for Airport Markings
      - AC 150/5340-30J, Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual Aids
      - AC 150/5390-2C, Heliport Design
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SAMANTHA CHEZ

- MAGB AN UA
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3186

[ August 13, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Barbara McCarthy , Judge; L.T. Case No.

18003070CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Virginia Murphy, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, G ERBER and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 9579.

#### McDaniel et al. *v.*Hays.

(Decided June 19, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Pike county.

*Mr. II. H. Sanderson*and *Messrs. Post & Reid,*for. plaintiffs in error.

*516*Messrs. Dougherty & Moore*and *Messrs. Eylar & Douglass,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price and Crew, JJ., concur.
Date: Time: Location:

1.) A complete pre - flight systematic check by the PIC of the Phantom’s physical condition, i.e. props, prop guards, landing gear, position indicator lights, battery capacity and overall airframe condition. If any of the above are not within the manufacturers minimum standards no flight will take place until such time as the issue(s) is repaired to manufacturers standards. *Although prop guards are not required on the Phantom 2 vision + v3, Droneview will not operate without them. 2.) Written documen tation of each physical inspection and repairs if any, by the PIC (pilot in command) will be kept with the Phantom and will be on - site and available for review. 3.) Software in relation to the Phantom’s operation will be checked for proper function. The most current DJI vision APP and the current firmware will be installed to assure the most up to date safety features. 4.) Prior to every flight, the compass on the Phantom 2 vision + will be calibrated as to ensure precision location. 5.) Droneview will ensure the alt imeter setting on the Phantom 2 vision + is that of AGL (above ground level) rather than GPS or barometric pressure derived settings. 6.) Every safety feature offered through the DJI vision APP will be enabled for every flight, every time. Additions to the checklist as deemed warranted by the PIC and the Observer/Spotter as warranted by the flight, area, weather conditions etc.

_________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________ _______________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________ __________________
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1371 

To extend the termination date of Office of the Special Inspector General 

of Iraq Reconstruction and provide additional funds for the Office, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 1, 2005 

Mr. FEINGOLD (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, and Mr. DODD) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To extend the termination date of Office of the Special 

Inspector General of Iraq Reconstruction and provide 

additional funds for the Office, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ongoing Oversight of 

5 Iraq Reconstruction Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•S 1371 IS

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO TERMINATION DATE OF OFFICE OF 

2 THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR 

3 IRAQ RECONSTRUCTION. 

4 Subsection (o) of section 3001 of the Emergency 

5 Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense and for the 

6 Reconstruction of Iraq and Afghanistan, 2004 (Public 

7 Law 108–106; 117 Stat. 1234; 5 U.S.C. App. 3 section 

8 8G note), as amended by section 1203(j) of the Ronald 

9 W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

10 Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2081), is 

11 amended by striking ‘‘obligated’’ and inserting ‘‘ex12 pended’’. 

13 SEC. 3. RECISSION OF FUNDS. 

14 Of the amount appropriated in chapter 2 of title II 

15 of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for 

16 Defense and for the Reconstruction of Iraq and Afghani17 stan, 2004 (Public Law 108–106; 117 Stat. 1224) under 

18 the heading ‘‘OTHER BILATERAL ECONOMIC ASSIST19 ANCE’’ and under the subheading ‘‘IRAQ RELIEF AND

20 RECONSTRUCTION FUND’’, $50,000,000 is authorized 

21 to be rescinded. 

22 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

23 In addition to any other amounts authorized to be 

24 appropriated for such purpose, there is authorized to be 

25 appropriated $50,000,000 for fiscal year 2006 to carry 

26 out section 3001 of the Emergency Supplemental Appro-
3 

•S 1371 IS

1 priations Act for Defense and for the Reconstruction of 

2 Iraq and Afghanistan, 2004 (Public Law 108–106; 117 

3 Stat. 1234), as amended by section 1203 of the Ronald 

4 W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

5 Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2081). 

Æ