alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lotfy E. GUIRGUIS and Nusa F. Guirguis, his wife, Appellants, v. Larry B. ELLIOT, Patrol Officer of the Florida Highway Patrol, and Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, Appellees.

No. 77-650.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 13, 1977.

*22Norman Dean Kohl, Jr. of Kohl, Springer & Springer, Palm Springs, for appellants.

Paul R. Regensdorf of Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee State of Florida.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See *Game & Fresh Water Fish Commission v. Carlile,*341 So.2d 1015 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**650 KA 15-00985**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
CY T. GIBSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SALVATORE F. LANZA, FULTON, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
GREGORY S. OAKES, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, OSWEGO (AMY L. HALLENBECK OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Oswego County Court (Walter W. Hafner, Jr., J.), rendered February 9, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the third degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Entered: July 1, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Verisity
Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Moshe Gavrielov, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: May 13, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/    MOSHE
GAVRIELOV
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------
|                   |  |  |  |
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2253]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (97-009)]


NASA Advisory Council, Advisory Committee on the International 
Space Station (ACISS); Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Advisory Committee on 
the International Space Station.

DATES: Tuesday, February 18, 1997, from 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. and 
Wednesday, February 19, 1997, from 12:30 p.m. until 2:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: NASA Headquarters, MIC 7, 300 E Street, SW, Washington DC, 
20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. W. Michael Hawes, Code M-4, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-0242.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room, on Tuesday, February 18, 1997, and 
from 12:30 p.m. until 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, February 19, 1997. The 
agenda for the meeting is as follows:

--Program Status Update
--SPACEHAB Presentation
--Task Group Reports

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: January 23, 1997.
Leslie M. Nolan,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-2253 Filed 1-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hartmarx Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Glenn R. Morgan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 9, 2007



|                    |  |                                                     
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ GLENN R. MORGAN
|Name:               |  | Glenn R. Morgan                                     
|Title:              |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
No. 9597.

#### American Surety Company of New York *v.*The Akron Savings Bank Co. et al.

*Mr. H. C. Willcox; Messrs. J. W. Mason*and *Mr. D. A. Doyle,*for plaintiff in error.

*466
      *Messrs. Grant & Sieber,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 21, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 133641 & (17) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 133641 

 COA: 276029 

Midland CC: 05-002619-FH 

JOSHUA KENT DIPZINSKI,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of September 14, 2007, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer 

the application for leave to appeal the March 8, 2007, order of the Court of Appeals. On 

order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is 

again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, 

we VACATE the sentence of the Midland Circuit Court, and we REMAND this case to 

the trial court for resentencing. The prosecutor acknowledges errors in the scoring of 

offense variables 1 and 9, which errors alter the guidelines sentence ranges for both 

convictions. Resentencing is therefore warranted. People v Francisco, 474 Mich 82 

(2006). On remand, the trial court shall make a record explaining the reasons for scoring 

each offense variable. In all other respects leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are 

not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

We do not retain jurisdiction. 

d1114 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 21, 2007 

 Clerk
#### PEOPLE POWER, Treme Community Improvement Association, St. Bernard Community Center, St. Mary’s Community Center v. SEWERAGE AND WATER BD. OF NEW ORLEANS.

No. 60801.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 1977.

In re: People Power, et al applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 349 So.2d 407.

Denied.

DENNIS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
#### Paul S. FOSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-696.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 24, 1978.

*226Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, and Michael C. Cheek, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and .Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of guilt on a charge of felony possession of marijuana. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the marijuana evidence. We agree and'reverse.

At the hearing on the motion, Clearwater Patrolman Robert Repp testified that one night at about 11:00 p. m. he observed a car traveling ten to fifteen miles per hour below the thirty miles per hour speed limit. However, he observed no erratic driving nor any violation of traffic laws. He further testified that he stopped the car because the passenger (appellant) appeared to be slumped over in the seat and he was concerned for- his welfare. Subsequent to the stop, Patrolman Repp and another officer shined their flashlight on appellant who was asleep in the car and saw that he was holding a clear plastic bag of marijuana. It was this marijuana which appellant asked the trial court to suppress.

It is our belief that the stop of the car in which appellant was a passenger was improper. Clearly, Officer Repp knew nothing from the facts which we have stated that would have given him a well-founded suspicion of criminal activity on the part of the occupants of the car. Moreover, the circumstances were not such as to give him a *reasonable*belief that an emergency existed. As a result he could not legally stop the car. *Lower v. State,*348 So.2d 410 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); *Long v. State,*310 So.2d 35 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

Since the stop was illegal, the seizure of the marijuana was also illegal because it was the fruit of an improper exercise of police power. *Lower v. State, supra.*Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and the order placing appellant on probation and remand the case for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and OTT and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
```

[110th Congress Public Law 395]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ395.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 4210]]

Public Law 110-395
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  245 North Main Street in New City, New York, as the ``Kenneth Peter 
    Zebrowski Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Oct. 13, 2008 -  [H.R. 
                                6199]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. KENNETH PETER ZEBROWSKI POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 245 North Main Street in New City, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Kenneth Peter Zebrowski Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Kenneth 
Peter Zebrowski Post Office Building''.

    Approved October 13, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6199 (S. 3625):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            Sept. 23, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 30, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<LEGEND>        This schedule contains summary financial
                information extracted from the December 31,
                1997 audited financial statements and is
                qualified in its entirety by reference to
                such financial statements.

<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997

<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997

<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS

<CASH>                                      51,881

<SECURITIES>                                47,843

<RECEIVABLES>                               32,950

<ALLOWANCES>                                 6,926

<INVENTORY>                                      0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           151,225

<PP&E>                                      23,576

<DEPRECIATION>                              22,330

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             167,422

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       86,191

<BONDS>                                          0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0

<PREFERRED>                                      0

<COMMON>                                       179

<OTHER-SE>                                  80,857

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               167,422


<SALES>                                    663,823

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           671,304

<CGS>                                      630,869

<TOTAL-COSTS>                              696,322

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0

<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              63

<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (25,081)

<INCOME-TAX>                                     0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (25,081)

<DISCONTINUED>                                   0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0

<CHANGES>                                        0

<NET-INCOME>                               (25,081)

<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (1.40)

<EPS-DILUTED>                                (1.40)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Burzynski Research Institute, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending February 29,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Burzynski Research Institute, Inc. and will beretained by Burzynski Research Institute, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Date:  May 28, 2008 |   | /s/ Stanislaw R.  Burzynski                    |
|--------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   | Stanislaw R.  Burzynski, President, Secretary, |
|                     |   | Treasurer and  Chairman of the                 |
|                     |   | Board of  Directors                            |
|                     |   | (Chief Executive  Officer and                  |
|                     |   | Principal  Financial Officer)                  |

 

 

----
No. 9058.

#### France et al., Partners, *v.*Frazee.

(Decided April 17, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Coshocton county.

*Messrs. Pomerene & Pomerene*and *Messrs. Sea-ton & Paine,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Waight & Moore*and *Mr. Burt P. Voorhees,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear,'JJ., concur.
/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 10, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00116

- CV

Norris J. DEVOLL

, Appellant

v.

Rebecca DEMONBREUN

, Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Cour t No. 2014

- CI

- 01296 Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellee's second unopposed motion to extend time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. Appellee's brief is due June 10, 2014.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 10t h day of June, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED



CERTIFICATION



I, Kenneth S. Shifrin, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K ofAmericanPhysicians Service Group, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrantsinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





|                     |                        
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|Date: March 13, 2008 | /s/ Kenneth S. Shifrin 
|                     | Kenneth S. Shifrin     
|                     | Chief Executive Officer
U.S. Department of Education

Supplemental Information for the SF-424

1. Project Director:

Prefix: * First Name: Middle Name: * Last Name: Suffix:

 

 Address:

 * Street1:

 Street2:

 * City:

 County:

 * State: * Zip Code: Country:

 * Phone Number (give area code): Fax Number (give area code):

 * Email Address:

2. Novice Applicant:

 Are you are a novice applicant as defined in the regulations in 34 CFR 75.225 (and included in the 

 definitions page in the attached instructions)? 

 Yes No

3. Human Subjects Research:

 a. Are any research activities involving human subjects planned at any time during the

 proposed Project Period?

Yes No

 b. Are ALL the research activities proposed designated to be exempt from the regulations?

Yes Provide Exemption(s) # (s): 1 2 3 4 5 6 

No Provide Assurance #(s), if available:

c. If applicable, please attach your “Exempt Research” or “Nonexempt Research” narrative to this form 

as indicated in the definitions page in the attached instructions. 

OMB Number: 1894-0007 

Expiration Date:
----

|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To      my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of Atlantic BancGroup, Inc., as of and for the period covered by the      report. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  May 13,      2008 | /s/ Barry W.      Chandler                 |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                               | Barry      W. Chandler                     |
|                               | President      and Chief Executive Officer |

----
#### David L. BURGESS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1776.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 9, 1977.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Frank B. Kessler, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Benedict P. Kuehne, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DOWNEY and LETTS, JJ., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially.

ANSTEAD, Judge,

concurring specially:

The trial court admitted into evidence, over the defendant’s objection, detailed statements by the investigating police officers as to what was told them by the victim of an attempted sexual battery. The court stated that the testimony was being admitted under the res gestae exception to the hearsay rule. The applicable law is set out in *Ellis v. State,*25 Fla. 702, 6 So. 768, 770 (1889):

> The female outraged should seek the first opportunity to complain, and the fact that she does complain goes to the jury as evidence, but her detailed statement of the circumstances under which she was outraged cannot be given in evidence on the trial of the case by the party to whom she made the statement. Such testimony [would be] hearsay .

Under this rule the police officers’ testimony would not be admissible. However, the victim herself testified as to the same facts set out in the officers’ testimony and there was overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt. Because of these circumstances I believe the admission of the officers’ testimony constituted harmless error. See *Irvin v. State,*66 So.2d 288 (Fla.1953).