alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004


In connection with the Quarterly Report of IEH Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 29, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Knoth,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectfully certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of the section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Robert Knoth
----------------
Robert Knoth
Chief Financial Officer, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer

Date: August 14, 2007

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to IEH Corporation. and will be retained by IEH Corporation. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       30
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries II, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: January 29, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries II, Inc.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1623 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Lewatit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2005 

Mr. LAUTENBERG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Lewatit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LEWATIT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.09.25 Ion-exchange resins (cationic 

H form), consisting of copolymers of acrylic acid and 

diethylene glycol divinyl 

ether (CAS No. 359785–58– 

3) (provided for in subheading 3914.00.60) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•S 1623 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### Fifi Barton CEFKIN and Ott Cefkin, Appellants, v. FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, a Florida corporation; City of Fort Lauderdale, a municipal corporation; Brian G. Flynn and Stephen W. Brown, Jr., Appellees.

No. 2452.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 8, 1969.

*49Hugh S. Glickstein, Hollywood, for appellants.

Edward A. Perse, Miami, and Don Allen, of Carey, Dwyer, Austin, Cole & Selwood, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees City of Fort Lauderdale and Brown.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a summary final judgment rendered by the Circuit Court for Broward County, Florida, in favor of the defendants City of Fort Lauderdale and its employee, Stephen W. Brown, Jr.

The alleged cause of action involves issues of simple negligence. The cause arose out of a rear end collision between a vehicle driven by the defendant Brian G. Flynn and a vehicle occupied by the plaintiffs. The defendant Flynn allegedly struck the plaintiffs’ vehicle from the rear when it stopped at an intersection to allow an emergency vehicle to proceed through. The complaint alleges that the emergency vehicle was operated by the defendant Stephen W. Brown, Jr., as a police officer employed by the defendant City of Fort Lau-derdale and that such operation was conducted in a negligent manner and was a proximate cause of the collision.

Our review of the record leads us to the conclusion that the defendants City of Fort Lauderdale and Stephen W. Brown, Jr., did not conclusively demonstrate the absence of all genuine issues of material fact. It appears to us that there were genuine issues of fact relating to the alleged negligence of the defendant Brown and the causal connection between his conduct and the accident. The judgment is, therefore, reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. See Holl v. Talcott, Fla. 1966, 191 So.2d 40.

Reversed.

CROSS, C. J., and REED, J., concur.

ADAMS, ALTO (Ret.), Associate Judge, dissents.
PUBLIC LAW 110–446—OCT. 21, 2008 122 STAT. 5011 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6902: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Sept. 27, considered and passed House. 

Oct. 2, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–446 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 513 6th 

Avenue in Dayton, Kentucky, as the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Nicholas Ray Carnes Post 

Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT NICHOLAS RAY CARNES POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 513 6th Avenue in Dayton, Kentucky, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Nicholas Ray 

Carnes Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Nicholas Ray Carnes Post Office’’. 

Approved October 21, 2008. 

Oct. 21, 2008 

[H.R. 6902] 


bjneal on POFP91QD1 with PUBLAWS
**Russian Oblast' Statistics (97001)**
Exhibit32.1

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofVillageEDOCS (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three monthsended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Quarterly Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

| Date:  November 7, 2003                                                           | /s/ K. Mason Conner                       |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|           ------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------- |
|                                                                                        | President and Chief Executive Officer     |

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BYSECTION 906, OR OTHER DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISEADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSIONOF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TOVILLAGEEDOCS AND WILL BE RETAINED BY VILLAGEEDOCS AND FURNISHED TO THESECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael J. ROWE and Melvin Rowe.

No. 61268.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 21, 1977.

In re: State of Louisiana through the District Attorney, Ossie Brown, applying *287for supervisory writs. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Application denied; no error of law in the ruling complained of.

SANDERS, C. J., concurs in denial on the ground that there is no abuse of the trial judge’s discretion.

SUMMERS, J., dissents. It was error to categorize the questioned statement of defendant as inculpatory.
# EMPLOYEE SPOTLIGHT: Ligia Perkins

/ Published May 20, 2016
PHILADELPHIA, 

**Organization:** DLA Troop Support – Clothing and Textiles

**Years of service:**7 years 

**What is your job, specifically?**Inventory management specialist - materiel planner in the DLA Pathways to Career Excellence Program. 

**What do you like most about your job?** There is always something happening. Things are always moving and changing, and I like that because it keeps me busy and I learn something every day.

**Where do you see yourself in five years?**I would like to be in a team lead position or on my way to it. 

**If you could speak directly to the warfighters you support, what would you say?**Your selfless service means that my family and I, [and] all the citizens of this country get to enjoy unlimited freedom. Thank you for what you do to protect our country. 

**What is your favorite thing about working for Troop Support?**My favorite thing is the feeling of paying it forward to the warfighter. Planning and fulfilling their needs is like a small token of appreciation for what they do. I served 7 years of active duty in the Army. I’ve been in their shoes, so I know what is like to be on the receiving end. It’s really an honor to be a part of this great team.

**What is your fondest memory of working for Troop Support?**I have not been in DLA long enough yet, but I would have to say it’s the fiscal year funding meetings of C&T because you get to see our senior management in action. It’s a real learning experience.

**What’s the most thrilling/adventurous thing you have ever done? It**was moving to New Jersey from San Antonio, Texas for a new job at Fort Dix, because I didn’t know anyone there. 

**Who is your personal hero and why?**My father, he is the kindest and most loving person and [made me] the person I am now. 

**What was your first job?**I worked at McDonald’s. I was a cook, a cashier, served the drive-thru, and even the kids’ birthday parties. You name it, I did it. 

**What advice would you give yourself of 10 years ago?**Trust your intuition, it’s almost always right. “Almost” is the key word because you’ll make mistakes, but it’s the best advisor you have. 

**What is your proudest accomplishment in life thus far?**It is my two kids. They are rotten to the core! You would think that they learn from me, but it turns out that I learn from them every day. They are amazing. 

**Who is the most important person in your life?**My husband, he has been there for me and supported me through everything that life has brought me. No one else comes close. 

**What has been the highlight of your career so far?** I think it is to have been selected for the PaCE program. Nothing else comes close. 

**What are your favorite television shows? “**The Walking Dead.”
#### POPULAR PUBLICATIONS, INC. v. DUNCAN.

No. 37985.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1969.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 14, 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
1

Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Kelly, Shaheerah

Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 8:23 AM

To: Ora V. Marek-Martinez

Cc: dmallory@ResoluteEnergy.com; pflynn@ResoluteEnergy.com; 

dinetahdoo@yahoo.com; Kelly, Shaheerah

Subject: RE: NHPA Consultation - Navajo Nation Historic Preservation Department

Ora,  

Thanks for the update. The materials were also mailed to your office.

************************************ 

Shaheerah Kelly 

Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Phone: 415-947-4156 

Fax: 415-947-3579 

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov

From: Ora V. Marek‐Martinez [mailto:oramm@navajo‐nsn.gov]  

Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 3:35 PM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Cc: dmallory@ResoluteEnergy.com; pflynn@ResoluteEnergy.com; dinetahdoo@yahoo.com

Subject: RE: NHPA Consultation ‐ Navajo Nation Historic Preservation Department

Thank you for contacting me, I am in receipt of your package and will review. Please note that we have 30 calendar days

for review.  

FYI‐ Ron Maldonado is no longer with HPD and I am the THPO.

Best,

Ora

Ora Marek-Martinez, PhD 

Navajo Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Officer 

Historic Preservation Department 

PO Box 4950 

Window Rock, AZ 86515 

Ph: (928) 871-7198 

Fx: (928) 871-7886 

From: Kelly, Shaheerah [mailto:Kelly.Shaheerah@epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 4:05 PM 

To: Ora V. Marek-Martinez 

Cc: timothy_begay@yahoo.com; rpm_crcs@yahoo.com; dmallory@ResoluteEnergy.com; pflynn@ResoluteEnergy.com; 
2

dinetahdoo@yahoo.com; Kelly, Shaheerah 

Subject: NHPA Consultation - Navajo Nation Historic Preservation Department 

Good afternoon,

Please review the attached documents. Feel free to contact me for questions.

************************************ 

Shaheerah Kelly 

Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Phone: 415-947-4156 

Fax: 415-947-3579 

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov
#### Franklin J. and Theo Elaine Benedict TRAINOR v. Bennett H. YOUNG and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co.

No. 60727.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 1977.

In re: Bennett H. Young and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 348 So.2d 1004.

Writ denied.

DIXON, CALOGERO and DENNIS, JJ., are of the opinion that a writ should be granted.
#### Nancy M. O’NEAL, Appellant, v. PENINSULAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. EE-85.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 22, 1977.

Harry Lewis Michaels and E. Douglas Spangler, Jr., of Michaels & Spangler, Tallahassee, for appellant.

William E. Williams of Mahoney, Hadlow & Adams, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, the named beneficiary of a life insurance policy, appeals a summary judgment in favor of insurer. The principles of the law applicable to summary judgments has been thoroughly explored by this court in *Connell v. Sledge,*306 So.2d 194 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). No useful purpose will be accomplished by repetition here. Rigid application of those principles is mandated by a recent opinion of the Supreme Court of Florida, *Wills v. Sears, Roebuck & Company,*351 So.2d 29 (Fla.1977), wherein the writer of that opinion stated:

> “A party moving for summary judgment must meet a twofold requirement:

> “The judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file together with the affidavits [in support or opposition, or both], if any, show [1] that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and [2] that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(c). “In order to carry its burden as to the first of these requirements, the movant must show *conclusively*the absence of any genuine issue of material fact, *Visingardi v. Tirone,*supra [Fla., 193 So.2d 601]; *Holl v. Talcott,*supra [Fla., 191 So.2d 40]. The *Holl*court additionally stated that the burden on parties moving for summary judgment is greater than the burden which the plaintiff must carry at trial, because the movant must prove a negative — the nonexistence of a genuine issue of material fact. Id. at 43.

> :{? # # * * #

> “Mindful as we are of the presumption of correctness which attaches to an order of the trial court, nevertheless we must draw every possible inference in favor of the party against whom the motion is made. *First Realty Corp. v. Standard Steel Treating Co.,*268 So.2d 410, 413 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972). Accordingly, we find that respondent has not carried its burden of showing conclusively that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact. * * *”

Application of the foregoing principles to the case sub judice in the light of *Johnson v. Life Ins. Co. of Georgia,*52 So.2d 813 (Fla.1951) and *Hardy*v. *American Southern Life Ins. Co.,*211 So.2d 559 (Fla.1968) requires reversal.

We only hold that the record as it existed at the time of entry of summary judgment here appealed was such as to render entry of that judgment improper. We do not determine nor even consider whether appellant will be ultimately entitled to recovery.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the principles announced in the above cited cases.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MILLS, JJ., concur.
#### Louis LEGER, Jr. v. DELANO PLANTATION, INC., et al.

No. 61366.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1978.

In re: Louis Leger, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of St. Landry. 352 So.2d 743.

Writ denied.

DIXON and CALOGERO, JJ., would grant the writ.
# Old vehicles get last chance to serve training firefighters

/ Published Oct. 31, 2017
Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar, When firefighters have to rescue someone trapped in a vehicle there is no time to lose, so training becomes very important to ensure the job can be done quickly and properly.Air Force firefighters serving in Qatar had help with their vehicle extrication training when they received excess vehicles from the DLA Disposition Services site there. Air Force Master Sgt. Stephen C. Ingrando, assistant chief of training for Fire Emergency Services at the air base, described the training as necessary for firefighters to stay proficient in their training and to keep them up with their skills. “Without ... everyone's help, this training would have had to wait until everyone got back home stateside,” Ingrando said.Ingrando also said the training allowed his personnel to work as a team and grow as a fire department. He said his chain of command and the firefighters really appreciated everything that went into this training and would like to do it again. Firefighters at forward bases in Afghanistan are also receiving vehicles for their training needs from DLA Disposition Services sites there.
**International Agriculture - Asia and Pacific RimReports are indicated with the symbol Datasets are marked with the symbol 
Agricultural Trade Between Asia/Near East Countries and the U.S. (ERS)Asia and Pacific Rim Situation and Outlook (ERS)China: Agricultural Inputs and Infrastructure (ERS)China: Agricutural Prices (ERS)China: Basic Social and Economic Indicators (ERS)China: Cost of Agricultural Production (ERS)China: Fibers and Oilseeds Statistics (ERS)China: Grain Statistics (ERS)China: Income, Consumption, and Expenditure Statistics (ERS)China: International Agricultural Trade (ERS)China: Livestock Statistics (ERS)China: Miscellaneous Crop Statistics (ERS)U.S. Agricultural Trade With the Developed Pacific Rim (ERS)USDA Economics and Statistics System
**
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Edward R. BOGLE, Richard G. Boksham, Robert M. Hoskins, Jr., Christopher R. Garrett and Thomas M. Gorman.

No. 61556.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 24, 1978.

In re: Edward R. Bogle, Richard G. Boks-ham, Robert M. Hoskins, Jr., Christopher R. Garrett and Thomas M. Gorman, applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition and for stay order. Parish of Beauregard.

Writ denied.

DENNIS, J., would grant writ.
# Army officer at DLA Troop Support promoted to lieutenant colonel

/ Published Jan. 24, 2018
PHILADELPHIA, 
An Army officer assigned to the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support was promoted to lieutenant colonel during a ceremony in Philadelphia Jan. 19. 

Lt. Col. Corinne Bell is the future operations chief in DLA Troop Support’s Customer Operations directorate. 

“Today is a great day for the Army, DLA and the Bell family celebrating your promotion to lieutenant colonel,” said Brig. Gen. Mark Simerly, DLA Troop Support commander, who officiated the ceremony. “These accomplishments can’t be done without the unwavering support of family.”

Bell’s family has strong military ties. Her father is a retired Army officer and her sister is an Army officer currently deployed. She watched the ceremony via video teleconference.

“You’re a well-rounded combat leader who’s proven in some of the harshest environments, continually seeks self-improvement and pushes others to do the same,” Simerly said. “You love your family and nation, and I look forward to seeing many more great things from you.”

Bell, a Gloucester, Virginia native, thanked those in attendance for supporting her throughout her 16-year career.

“I stand proud knowing I’m here because of the support from my family and colleagues,” Bell said. “I’m grateful and humble knowing that I can always count on you.”

Bell also thanked her parents and husband for who she is today.

“Thank you for your sacrifices, showing me the value of pride and giving me strength to leave the nest,” Bell said. “To my husband, I value and love you more than you’ll ever know.”
# Map            Europe.