alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DSCR employees adopt 113 angels from Chesterfield County and Richmond City Public Schools

/ Published Dec. 9, 2016
RICHMOND, Va., 
There was an air of excitement on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, at the Defense Logistics Agency Installation Support at Richmond’s fire station Dec. 8 as employees drove through the fire truck bay dropping off gifts for the 113 angels adopted from Chesterfield County and Richmond City Public Schools. 

DSCR employees have adopted angels from G. H. Reid, Bellwood, and Bensley Elementary Schools and Meadowbrook High School for more than 25 years.  This year’s gifts included clothes, bikes, books, dolls, action heroes, and electronics.

“Because of the many construction projects and building renovations on DSCR, there was no location to have a gift drop off this year,” said Amy Clement, chief of DLA Aviation’s Public Affairs Office.  “I was in a meeting with DLA Installation Support leaders in October and was concerned about not having a location to hold the Angel Tree gift drop off.  Without hesitation, Fire Chief Don Rodgers immediately offered the fire station.

“Chief Rodgers, his firefighters and paramedics went above and beyond in decorating truck bays and providing refreshments and candy canes to volunteers and employees as they came through to drop off their gifts,” said Clement.

Firefighters helped unload gifts and also took the opportunity to pass out holiday and winter weather safety literature. 

Angel tree volunteers liked the new drive-thru setup so much and it went so smoothly, Rodgers volunteered his facility again for next year. 

“Hosting the drop off was a pleasure.  These guys [our fire and emergency services personnel] always go above and beyond not only with fire and emergency issues, but in any way to help members of the community,” said Rodgers. “We have always adopted and provided gifts and when the need for a location and assistance with logistics came up, we knew it was the right thing to do to volunteer our help and facility. It’s also a great opportunity to educate the workforce about holiday safety when they drop off gifts, and we plan on partnering with the DLA Aviation Public Affairs Office for Angel Tree next year.”

“I am amazed and grateful every year of the support DLA employees provide to our local schools’ Angel Trees,” said Clement.  “Not only do they open up their purses, but they also give their time to shop, wrap and bring gifts. Couple this with the Fire Department and the many military and civilian DLA volunteers who help facilitate and execute the program and you have a shining example of what giving back and helping those in need in our community means. This is what the true spirit of giving is about.”

“What a great program, I was so inspired by the level of giving that the DSCR community provided to those children,” said Rodgers. “We were truly blessed to be a part of this today.  The firefighters and I had a great time working with everyone and we look forward to helping out in the future.”
#### Judy SAMANIEGO v. HORSELESS CARRIAGE, INC.

No. 60912.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1977.

In re: Horseless Carriage, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Ouachita. 350 So.2d 193.

Writ refused.
254 La. 516

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ronald Ray CLARK.

No. 50004.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 21, 1969.

In re: Ronald Ray Clark applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Writs denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
# Contests for Students

** Share This      

** Print the Page

The U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) is committed to educating the next generation of peacebuilders about the U.S. role in preventing and resolving conflicts around the world, and about the important part that young people can play as engaged global citizens.

Starting in 1987, USIP challenged students to think critically about global issues of conflict and peace through the National Peace Essay Contest (NPEC). Now, USIP is building upon the legacy of the NPEC (which was wrapped up in 2014) by partnering with other organizations on a range of initiatives that inspire students to learn more about global peacebuilding and to put their own good ideas into action.

Make sure to explore our other resources for students, teachers, and the broader public by visiting the Public Education section. 

## Academic WorldQuest

Each year, the World Affairs Councils of America (WACA) engages more than 4,000 high school students across the U.S. in its signature quiz contest that tests their knowledge of global issues and foreign policy in 10 categories. Since 2016, USIP has been a co-sponsor of this national contest, ensuring the inclusion of a peace and conflict category in Academic WorldQuest each year. 

For the 2021 competition, USIP’s category is **“Exploring Peace in a World of Conflict,”** with featured resources that blend research, data, and real-life examples of peacebuilding in action. For more information, check out our Academic WorldQuest page! 

## National High School Essay Contest

As a successor to USIP’s own National Peace Essay Contest, USIP has since 2015 partnered with the American Foreign Service Association (AFSA) on its annual National High School Essay Contest. The contest engages high school students in learning and writing about issues of peace and conflict, and encourages appreciation for diplomacy’s role in building partnerships that can advance peacebuilding and protect national security. 

The winner of the contest receives a $2,500 cash prize, an all-expense paid trip to Washington, D.C. to meet leadership at the U.S. Department of State and USIP, and a full-tuition paid voyage with Semester at Sea upon the student’s enrollment at an accredited university. The runner-up receives a $1,250 cash prize and a full scholarship to participate in the International Diplomacy Program of the National Student Leadership Conference. 

Explore the 2022 essay contest topic, “Partnerships for Peace in a Multipolar Era,” download this year’s contest study guide, and learn more about the essay contest here.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Army Col. Fredric E. Johnson: the consummate Army petroleum professional

By Dr. Harold RaughDLA Historian Office

                FORT BELVOIR, Virginia  –              *Editor’s Note: This article is based on papers sent by retired Army Col. Fredric Johnson’s son, Fredric Johnson II, to the DLA historians. These documents include Johnson’s nomination packet for induction into the Quartermaster Hall of Fame in 1992, letters of recommendation, a detailed obituary and various other items.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

historyDLA Energy
[PETERS ELWORTHY & MOORE LETTERHEAD]
                               Salisbury House, Station Road
                                 Cambridge CB1 2LA England
 
Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc.          Our Ref:  PRC/J/5799
1025 West Nursery Road, Suite 120              Date:     31 March 1998
Linthicum, MD  21090-1203  USA

Dear Sirs

Noise Cancellation Technologies (UK) Limited

We are writing to you with  confirmation that the accounts for the year ended 31
December 1997 were audited under  auditing  standards  which are  "substantially
similar" or "similar in all  material  respects" to US General   Accepted  Audit
Standards.

Yours faithfully

/s/  PETERS ELWORTHY & MOORE
### R HODE I SLAND D EP ARTMENT OF E l'\VIRONMENTAL M ANAGEMENT 2 35 Pro m enade Street, Provide nce , RI 02908

- 5767 TDD 401-222-4462

18 January 2011
David Conroy EPA- New England, Region T 5 Post Office Square Mail Code OEP05 -2 B.oston, MA 02109-3912 Dear Mr. Conroy: The Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Resources (OAR) is hereby submitting amended Rhode Island Air Pollution Control Regulation Nos. 9, 28 and 29 as formal revi sions to the Rhode Island State Implementation Plan (SIP). The principal amendments to APC Regulation No.9, entitled "Air Pollution Contro l Permits" and APC Regulation No. 29, entitled "Operating Permits", are to adopt the provisions of US EPA's Greenhou se Gas Tailoring Rule into state regulations. Additionally, OAR ha s made certain technical revisions to APC Regulation No. 9 and APC Regulation No. 28, entitled "Operating Perm it Fees". The t echnica l revis i ons to APC Regu lation No. 9 include COITecting the Minimum Quantity for toluene and xylene in Appendix A to be consistent with the Minimum Quantity for toluene and xylene in APC Regulation No. 22, entitled "Air Toxics". The technical revisions to APC Regulation No. 28 ensure consistent usc ofthe term "regulated air pollutant" throughout the regulation. On 12 November 20 10 a notice was posted on the websites of the Rhode Is land Department of Environmental Management and the Rhode Island Office of Secretary of State and was mailed to interested parties announcing a public comment period to accept comments on the adoption of proposed revisions to Air Pollution Control Regulation Nos. 9 , 28 and 29. The notice stated that a public hearing would be held if requested by tw enty five or more people , a governmental agency or subdivisions, or an association having not less than twenty five members
. No requests for a public h earing were received. The public comment period extended until4:00 PM on 13 December 2010. The following support docume nt s arc included in thi s s ubm ittal package: I. A copy ofthe Notice ofPublic Comment P eriod.

-() 30% post
- consumer fiber

### 2. A copy of an Affidavit of Publicati on/Posting for the no6ce. 3. A list ofth e persons that were e-mailed or mailed a copy ofthe notice. 4. A copy of the Decision , including responses to the written comments received; and 5
. A cop y of the amended regulations as fil ed wi th the RJ Secretary of State , including any revisions noted in the Decision; Ifyou have any questions about this submittal, please contact me at (401) 222

- 2808 ext. 7011. Very truly yours,

# ??:t:~**icf** Office of Air Resource s
#### First National Bank of Kansas City, Appellant, *vs.*Peter Arnoldia, Respondent.

1. *Special tax bill*— Work *included in and not embraced in contract*— Effect *of on bill.*— The fact that a special tax bill is made to include work done by one who has no contract therefor with the city, does not invalidate ihe whole bill and prevent all recovery thereon. (See Neenan vs. Smith, 60 Mo. 292).

*Jippeal from, Special Law fy Equity Court of Jackson Co.*

*Tomlinson*& Ross, for Appellant,

cited: Neenan vs. Smith, 60 Mo. 292.

*Jenkins & Twitchell,*for Respondent,

cited: Creighton vs. Monson, 27 Cal. 613.

Sherwood, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Action on special tax bill. The plaintiff is the assignee of one Landy, to whom the tax bill was delivered by the city engineer, who it seems included in the bill, work done by one Corrigan, under the mistaken idea that he had made a contract with the city for the performance of the work. Landy it appears paid Corrigan for the work he had done, and having made a contract with the city, completed the work already begun by Corrigan, and received a tax bill for the full amount of the work done, inclusive of that performed by Corrigan. The court below held that this action on the part of the engineer, invalidated the whole bill, and precluded any recovery whatever on the part of the plaintiff.

This was an erroneous view of the matter as ruled by us in Neenan vs. Smith (60 Mo. 292). Judgment reversed and cause remanded ;

Judge Hough not sitting. ' The other judges concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21077]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-436-000]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

August 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 1, 1997, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to become effective August 1, 
1997:

Twenty-fourth Revised Sheet No. 8
Twenty-sixth Revised Sheet No. 9
Twenty-fifth Revised Sheet No. 13
Twenty-sixth Revised Sheet No. 16
Twenty-first Revised Sheet No. 18

    ANR states that the above-referenced tariff sheets are being filed 
to commence recovery of approximately $2.8 million of additional 
pricing differential (PD) and carrying costs that have been incurred by 
ANR during the period March 1, 1997 through May 31, 1997 as a result of 
the implementation of Order Nos. 636, et seq. ANR proposes a 
reservation fee surcharge applicable to its Part 284 firm 
transportation customers to recover ninety percent (90%) of the PD 
costs, and an adjustment to the maximum base tariff rates applicable to 
Rate Schedule ITS and overrun service rendered pursuant to Rate 
Schedule FTS-2, so as to recover the remaining ten percent (10%). ANR 
advises that the proposed charges would increase its PD surcharge from 
$0.167 to $0.196.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21077 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Need to return call by / at/between and

. Signature: Project No.: 0172.0 9.005.412 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: 304m 2012 Annual Review 

### CBI?

Yes

No TELEPHONE CALL RECOR D Incoming Outgoing Date: 01/25 /1 2 Time: 9:00 am

pm

Company Name: Nebraska DEQ ERG Staff Name: Kimberly Landick

Contact Name: Reuel Anderson and Cay Ewoldt Contact Phone Number: ( 402) 471

- 1367 and (402)

471

- 2023

General Subject: Meat and Poultry Facility Discharges



### TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

On January 25, 2012 at 9am I called the Nebraska NPDES Permits and Compliance Unit and was given the names of 2 permit writers for the 3 facilities I requested information about:

1. Reuel Anderson (402

- 471

- 1367)

– Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., Lexington, NE permit writer

2. Cay Ewoldt (402

- 471

- 2023)

– Cargill Meat Solutions Corp, Schuyler, NE and Farmland Foo ds, Inc, Crete, NE permit writer

I called Reuel Anderson and Cay Ewoldt around 9am on January 25, 2012 and left messages for both of them.

At 11:57am on January 25, Reuel Anderson returned my call. He stated that the Tyson Fresh Meats facility in Lexing ton, NE falls under Subcategory B because they are a complex slaughterhouse. The size of the facility is 6,000 heads per day. He stated that I can request an updated permit from Nebraska’s Public Records Request (402

- 471

- 3557) and to request fact sheets as well. The facility’s permit limits were based on both water quality criteria and effluent limitation guidelines; they were compared when determining the permit limits. He stated that this facility has two outfalls, one that is used and one that is not use d (but both have the same permit limits). He didn’t think that the facility was required to sample for nitrates and that it was included in the Total Nitrogen limits but to double check with the permit. He also didn’t know of any discharge that is currentl y not being regulated at the facility.

I called Nebraska’s Public Records Request and asked how to go about requesting copies of permits. I was told to email my request to ndeq.records@nebraska.gov . I sent this email after talking to the public records request department. I sent a follow up email requesting the facility fact sheets as well on January 27 th , 2012.

On January 27

, 2012 at 9am Cay Ewoldt returned my call. He stated that the inspectors for the specific facilities would know more about the facilities that he would. He did say that for the Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. facility, the permit limits were based on weight and that the ammonia limits were more stringent than the water quality cri teria. He said that they had compared waste load allocations and ELGs and used the most stringent for the permit limits. The Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation inspector is Brett Anderson (402

- 595

- 1766) and the Farmland Foods, Inc inspector is Reuel Anders on (402

- 471

- 1367).

I received the facility permits and fact sheets on January 27 th , 2012.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 01837**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 01837\01837_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 01837\01837_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 01837\01837_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 01837\01837_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01837\01837_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01837\01837_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01837\01837_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01837\01837_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 01837\Certification Statement Plant ID_01837.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 01837\Supporting Documentation\01837_Attachment 1_Part A_Sec. 5_A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01837\Supporting Documentation\Attachment 2_Part A_Sec. 5_A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-KSB
ExperTelligence, Inc.
File No. 0-28453


          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of ExperTelligence, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended  September 30, 2006 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jason Smart, Chief
Executive and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: June 14 2007        By:  /s/ Jason Smart
                               ---------------------------
                               Jason Smart
                               Chief Executive Officer and
                               Chief Financial Officer




-------------------------
A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to ExperTelligence,  Inc. and will be retained by ExperTelligence, Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 158 (Friday, August 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43777-43778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21603]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


The Enhanced-Use Development of VAMC Portland, OR

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice of designation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs is 
designating the Portland, OR, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 
Center (VAMC) for an Enhanced-Use development. The Department intends 
to enter into a long-term lease of real property with the Vancouver 
(WA) Housing Authority. The Vancouver Housing Authority, in turn, will 
establish a newly formed 501(C)(3) corporation which will become the 
managing general partner of the project, and will finance, design, 
construct, and manage a Single Room Occupancy

[[Page 43778]]

facility to consist of 126 units of single room occupancy and studio 
apartments. Fifty percent (63 beds) of the facility will be designated 
as veteran preference, to provide affordable housing for homeless 
veterans with occupants to be referred and case managed by the Portland 
VA Medical Center.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacob Gallun, Asset and Enterprise 
Development Office (189), Veterans Health Administration, Department of 
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 20420, (202) 
565-4307.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 38 U.S.C. Sec 8161 et seq., specifically 
provides that the Secretary may enter into an Enhanced-Use lease, if 
the Secretary determines that at least part of the use of the property 
under the lease will be to provide appropriate space for an activity 
contributing to the mission of the Department, the lease will not be 
inconsistent with and will not adversely affect the mission of the 
Department; and the lease will enhance the property. This project meets 
these requirements.

    Approved: August 5, 1997.
Hershel W. Gober,
Secretary-Designate.
[FR Doc. 97-21603 Filed 8-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M