alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Troop Support 'trailblazers' honored at Women's History Month program

/ Published March 23, 2017
PHILADELPHIA, 

Women in American history who overcame challenges to advance in business and labor, while mapping the road to progress for others, served as inspiration during a Women’s History Month program March 21 at the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support in Philadelphia. 

Keynote speaker Rev. Dr. Elizabeth Conde-Frazier highlighted several women who “defended the social mores of their times by demonstrating women’s abilities to create organizations ... that pave the way for better working conditions and wages.”

Conde-Frazier is the academic dean and vice president of education at Esperanza College of Eastern University. She spoke about activist Lucy Gonzalez Parsons’ “radical compassion” and Maggie Walker, the first woman to charter a bank in the U.S., among others. 

While Barbara Franklin served as Secretary of Commerce under President George H.W. Bush, American exports increased, as did trade with China. After she highlighted those accomplishments, Conde-Frazier asked the audience to reflect on how they might follow Franklin’s map to progress.

“This woman used her talents and the sphere of influence that she gained because of her brilliance,” Conde-Frazier said. “What is your talent? What is the influence you might have that can be used to create change and open doors for others?”

The Women’s History Month program theme was “Honoring Trailblazing Women in Labor and Business.” The program culminated with an awards ceremony, in which three DLA Troop Support employees were recognized for their contributions to the advancement of women.

“Today we honor some of our colleagues for blazing a trail for others to follow as exemplary models of public service and government leadership,” Richard Ellis, Troop Support deputy commander, said. 

The ‘Woman of the Year’ awardees in their respective categories were:
        -  Barbara Koons, Procurement Process Support, non-supervisor female employee in grades GS-9 and below 
        -  Tanya Lawrence, Clothing and Textiles, non-supervisory female employee in grade GS-11 and above 
        -  Lisa Marie Vivino, Clothing and Textiles, supervisor/manager of the year 

“Women at all levels and in all offices throughout Troop Support have, and continue to make, significant contributions resulting in superior warfighter support,” Ellis said. 

The Troop Support Equal Employment Opportunity Advisory Committee hosted the program.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1276 

To amend section 1111 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 regarding challenging academic content standards for physical 

education. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 21, 2005 

Mr. CORNYN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend section 1111 of the Elementary and Secondary 

Education Act of 1965 regarding challenging academic 

content standards for physical education. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress makes the following findings: 

5 (1) Obesity-related diseases cost the United 

6 States economy more than $100,000,000,000 every 

7 year. 

8 (2) Almost half of young people aged 12 

9 through 21, and more than a third of high school 
2 

•S 1276 IS

1 students, do not participate in vigorous physical ac2 tivity on a regular basis. 

3 SEC. 2. PHYSICAL EDUCATION. 

4 Section 1111(b) of the Elementary and Secondary 

5 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311(b)) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (1)(C)— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘arts, and’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘arts,’’; and 

9 (B) by striking ‘‘science,’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘science and (beginning in the 2006–2007 

11 school year) physical education,’’; and 

12 (2) in paragraph (3)— 

13 (A) in subparagraph (A)— 

14 (i) by striking ‘‘and science’’ and in15 serting ‘‘science, and physical education’’; 

16 and 

17 (ii) by inserting before the period 

18 ‘‘and no State shall be required to meet 

19 the requirements of this part relating to 

20 physical education assessments until the 

21 beginning of the 2008–2009 school year’’; 

22 and 

23 (B) in subparagraph (C)(v)— 

24 (i) in subclause (II)(cc), by inserting 

25 ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon; and 
3 

•S 1276 IS

1 (ii) by adding at the end the fol2 lowing: 

3 ‘‘(III) beginning not later than 

4 school year 2008–2009, measure the 

5 proficiency of all students in physical 

6 education and be administered not 

7 less than 1 time during— 

8 ‘‘(aa) grades 3 through 5; 

9 ‘‘(bb) grades 6 through 9; 

10 and 

11 ‘‘(cc) grades 10 through 

12 12;’’. 

Æ
# DLA Distribution Commanding General's Veterans Day Message

/ Published Nov. 11, 2017
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
DLA Distribution Team,

Veterans Day is a national holiday set aside to thank and honor all Warfighters who have served honorably in the military, during peacetime and war.  It is intended to thank our living Veterans for their service and show appreciation for their contributions to our collective security.  Veterans Day underscores the fact that all those who served...not only those who have died...have sacrificed in the performance of their duty. 

To all our Veterans...**thank you**...thank you for everything you’ve done to protect our freedom and our way of life.  Among our Distribution family are thousands of these heroes who have served... some serving for a few years and many dedicating a major portion of their life to military service.  While these Veterans may no longer wear the uniform, by choosing to continue their service with DLA Distribution they continue their contribution to our collective security by performing our critical Distribution mission of providing the Right Things...at the Right Place, at the Right Time!  They continue to be an inspirational example to us all.  

On behalf of Ms. Gonzales and myself, and from my family to yours, **thank you** for what you do every day.  We thank all of you who have served before, those who are serving now, and those of you across the DLA Distribution network who work hard every day to support Warfighters around the world.  

I am proud to be on your team!   

**Happy Veterans Day!**

BG John S. Laskodi 

Commanding General 

DLA Distribution

Warfighter First!
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries VI, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 6, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries VI, Inc.
Exhibit 32.1


                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                            SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Ronson
Corporation (the "Company"), certifies that:

      (1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
            period ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78 m or 78 o(d)); and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Dated: August 14, 2007                  /s/ Louis V. Aronson II
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Louis V. Aronson II
                                        President & Chief Executive Officer


Dated: August 14, 2007                  /s/ Daryl K. Holcomb
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Daryl K. Holcomb
                                        Vice President & Chief Financial Officer


      This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.


                                       23
# DLA Distribution Yokosuka Town Hall honors personnel 

/ Published July 24, 2017
YOKOSUKA, Japan, Distribution center commander Navy Supply Corps Cmdr. Nolasco Villanueva presented James Stewart, Receiving Branch materiel handler, a 50-year Federal service certificate, pin and letter from the DLA Director in recognition for his time with the organization.   
Additionally, the site’s military members had the privilege of promoting one of their sailors.  Recently, three of the organization’s sailors were promoted as a result of outstanding scores on a Navy-wide exam.  However, the site’s military admin discovered a fourth sailor’s score had a negative discrepancy and submitted a challenge on behalf of Petty Officer Kevin Craig Jr., resulting in his advancement to Second Class Petty Officer during the town hall.  

Finally, Villanueva announced Petty Officer Xiaoyang Xing’s selection as a Meritorious Advancement Program selectee, advancing her to the rank of First Class Petty Officer.  The MAP allows commanders to select sailors for advancement based upon their proven readiness for the next level of responsibility.

Xing was also presented the Combined Federal Campaign Gold Award for her assistance with the site’s CFC campaign.  The Gold Award honors commands with more than 75 percent employee participation.
#### Wilburn T. RUSSELL and Janice B. Russell, Appellants, v. Jane Ann GUIDER, Helen N. Guider, and United Services Automobile Association, a corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellees.

No. 77-1531.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 2, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 3, 1978.

Robert G. Ferrell, III, of Ferrell & Jaco-bus, Melbourne, for appellants.

Barbara Kane of Smalbein, Eubank, Johnson, Rosier & Bussey, P.A., Rockledge, for appellees.

GREEN, OLIVER L., Associate Judge.

The plaintiff-appellants assign as error certain questions by defense counsel during the voir dire examination in the trial below. They also assign as error comments by defense counsel with regard to this same subject matter during closing arguments. These questions and comments by defense counsel were clearly improper.

The action below was, in general, a typical automobile collision case with an admission of liability. Defense counsel made more than one blatant attempt to inject an emotional issue before the jury concerning a possible relationship between verdicts in such cases generally and the rising insurance premium rates. Although we are firm in our censure of defense counsel for this clearly improper tactic, we are mindful that plaintiffs’ counsel failed to either move for a mistrial or for an instruction that the jury disregard the comments as having no place in the consideration of its verdict.

No error on behalf of the trial judge has, therefore, been established, and although these acts by defense counsel were improper, we do not find them to be error of a fundamental nature. See *Griffith v. Shamrock Village,*94 So.2d 854 (Fla. 1957); *Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co. v. Strickland,*88 So.2d 519 (Fla. 1956); *Tampa Transit Lines v. Corbin,*62 So.2d 10 (Fla. 1953); *Apalachicola Northern Railroad Company v. Tyus,*114 So.2d 33 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959).

The final judgment is affirmed.

DAUKSCH and BERANEK, JJ„ concur.
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Mary Anne DeYoung, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of 1mage Software, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 29, 2004

/s/  MARY ANNE DEYOUNG
-----------------------------------
Mary Anne DeYoung
Vice President, Finance and Principal Financial Officer
# C_2014184EN.01000401.xml

| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/4

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 27 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona — Spain) — Bright Service SA v Repsol Comercial de Produtos Petrolíferos SA

(Case C-142/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Article 81 EC - Exclusive purchasing agreement - Exemption - Regulation (EEC) No 1984/83 - Agreement to which the exemption applies - Regulation (EC) No 2790/1999 - Agreement to which the exemption does not apply - Temporal effects of the exemption))

2014/C 184/05

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona — Spain

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bright Service SA

Applicant:

Defendant: Repsol Comercial de Produtos Petrolíferos SA

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona — Interpretation of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1984/83 of 22 June 1983 on the application of Article 85(3) of the Treaty to categories of exclusive purchasing agreements (OJ 1983 L 173, p. 5) and Article 3(1) and (5)(a) and Article 12(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2790/1999 of 22 December 1999 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices (OJ 1999 L 336, p. 21) — Temporal effects — Exclusive distribution agreement for motor-vehicle fuels and other fuels between a supplier and a service station operator — Agreement concluded under Regulation No 1984/83 having effect after the entry into force of Regulation No 2790/1999 — Agreement which does not satisfy the requirements of those two regulations

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 12(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2790/1999 of 22 December 1999 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices must be interpreted as meaning that a contract — containing a non-compete clause — which was already in force on 31 May 2000 and which satisfies the conditions laid down in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1984/83 of 22 June 1983 on the application of Article 85(3) of the Treaty to categories of exclusive purchasing agreements, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1582/97 of 30 July 1997, but which does not satisfy the conditions of Regulation No 2790/1999, is excepted, under Article 12(2), from the scope of Article 81(1) EC only until 31 December 2001.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 22. 6. 2013.

1

---
EXHIBIT 15

             REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To The Board of Directors and Stockholders
PHAZAR CORP and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying  consolidated balance sheets of PHAZAR CORP and
Subsidiaries  as of May  31,  2006,  and  2005,  and  the  related  consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years then
ended.  These  consolidated  financial  statements are the responsibility of the
Company's  management.  Our  responsibility  is to  express  an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted  our audits in  accordance  with  standards  of the Public  Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and  perform  the  audit  to  obtain  reasonable  assurance  about  whether  the
consolidated  financial statements are free of material  misstatement.  An audit
includes  examining,  on a test  basis,  evidence  supporting  the  amounts  and
disclosures in the  consolidated  financial  statements.  An audit also includes
assessing the  accounting  principles  used and  significant  estimates  made by
management,  as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated  financial statements referred to above present
fairly,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  position of PHAZAR CORP and
subsidiaries  as of May 31,  2006,  and   2005,  and the results of their
operations  and their cash flows for the years then ended,  in  conformity  with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.



WEAVER AND TIDWELL, L.L.P.
Fort Worth, Texas
July 28, 2006





















                                 Exhibit 15 - 1
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 21, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 133641 & (17) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 133641 COA: 276029 Midland CC: 05-002619-FH JOSHUA KENT DIPZINSKI, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of September 14, 2007, the pros ecuting attorney was directed to answer the application for leave to appeal the March 8, 2007, order of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the answer having been received, the appli cation for leave to appeal is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302 (G)(1), in lieu of gran ting leave to appeal,
we VACATE the sentence of th e Midland Circuit Court, and we REMAND this case to the trial court for resentencing . The prosecutor acknowledges errors in the scoring of offense variables 1 and 9, which errors alte r the guidelines sent ence ranges for both convictions. Resentencing is therefore warranted. People v Francisco , 474 Mich 82 (2006). On remand, the trial court shall make a record explaining th e reasons for scoring
each offense variable. In all other respects leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaini ng questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

d1114 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 21, 2007

Clerk
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 1448

FERMIN ALDABE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. JONATHAN COHEN; JOSEPH J. SIMONS; REBECCA KELLY SLAUGHTER; NOAH JOSHUA PHILLIPS; ROHIT CHOPRA; CHRISTINE S. WILSON; BENJAMIN J. THEISMAN; AMANDA B. KOSTNER; KHOURYANNA DIPRIMA; CREIGHTON MAGID; THE GOVERMENT OF BELIZE; THE CENTRAL BANK OF BELIZE; JOY GRANT; ATLANTIC INTERNATIONAL BANK, LTD; JULIAN MURILLO , Defendants

- Appellees , and
UNITED STATES OF AME RICA , Defendant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Peter J. Messitte , Senior District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 00803

- PJM )

Submitted : August 23, 2022 Decided: August 25, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge , HEYTENS, Circuit Judge , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1448 Doc: 25 Filed: 08/25/2022 Pg: 1 of 32 Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Fermin Aldabe, Appellant Pro Se. Creighton Magid, DORSEY & WHITNEY, LLP, Washington, D

. C

. ; John Augustine Bourgeois, Andrew Jay Graham, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA , Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1448 Doc: 25 Filed: 08/25/2022 Pg: 2 of 33 PER CURIAM:
Fermin Aldabe seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing some, but not all, of the claims raised in his civil complaint . This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R . Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541,
545

- 46 (1949). The order Aldabe seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-1448 Doc: 25 Filed: 08/25/2022 Pg: 3 of 3