alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Carol GARCIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-569.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

June 24, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 9, 1969.

Harry W. Prebish, Richard M. Gale, Miami, for appellant.

*18Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Harold Mendelow, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ., and LOPEZ, AQUILINO, Jr., Associate Judge.

LOPEZ, AQUILINO, Jr., Associate Judge.

Defendant, Carol Garcia, was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to fourteen years imprisonment. Defendant and three other defendants, to-wit, Norma A. Roman, Barbara Ann Stetzler and Margaret Pearl Wolford, were indicted for first degree murder. The indictment alleged that Carol Garcia along with the aforementioned other defendants, unlawfully and from a premeditated design to effect the death of Ivan R. Rousseau, did kill and murder the said Rousseau by striking and beating' him. Prior to trial, defendant Garcia and the other defendants moved for a severance but a separate trial was denied and all four defendants were tried together. The jury found the defendant Garcia and defendants, Roman and Stetzler, guilty of manslaughter but acquitted Wolford, the other defendant. The first trial of these defendants had ended in a mistrial.

Carol Garcia filed her motion for new trial alleging that the court erred in denying her motion for severance and a separate trial. This appeal was then filed.

The point on appeal is whether or not the Court erred in denying the motion for severance where the prosecution introduced in evidence confessions of the co-defendants, Roman and Stetzler, inculpating this defendant and depriving her of her constitutional rights when said defendants did not testify.

A review of the trial proceedings, reveals that the defendant Carol Garcia and the co-defendants, Roman and Stetzler, did not take the witness stand. The trial Court admitted Roman’s and Stetzler’s statement inculpating Carol Garcia, notwithstanding the fact that Carol Garcia did not testify. The Court instructed the jury that each statement could only be considered against the defendant making the statement and no defendant’s statement could be considered against any other defendant. This trial was held prior to the rendering of the decision in the case of Bruton v. United States, 1968, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476. Upon consideration of the Bruton decision, we conclude that error was committed despite the trial court’s instructions. According to Bruton v. United States and Roberts v. Russell, 1968, 392 U.S. 293, 88 S.Ct. 1921, 20 L.Ed. 1100, which holds that Bruton is applicable to a court proceeding and retroactive, this cause must be reversed for a new trial. See also Schneble v. State, Fla.1967, 201 So.2d 881; Schneble v. State, Fla., 215 So.2d 611; Stubbs v. State, Fla.App.1969, 222 So.2d 228.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.
sate: meeting with Monsanto-6/4/15 

Organization Email 

PRD/EPA Nguyen.khue@epa.gov 

H.cN~TD 

~rHo AA 

~ H.o \1 SAi\/TO • c 0 ~ 

v L..u fY..ON s A,...S'f 0 

\-W\~ . M . n""\o. net'-\.\" (!) ""6'-'~c:t"'~ • ~ W'\o 

l-1\0NSAN.TO -c'nad. e ~ wv, . <' ~ ~ 'IT'\C't'\Sa"*o • c.c..VV') 

N't)l'l.m~ !::1'<.1C. 'S 

SAC.~S® 

M~tJ'iO , q,l'l\ 

lO ('{\ 0 \ll \Ct V\. +'U -, ·, \ \ <A-t2 VVt. OVlJ Cl Vl -tv .. ( 0 Vt.--1 

 ~A ~kl\cJL.. 'CVA /SY~-n \ '0\A \ () -\ u -:MA' 'n.V , rn ~a 111 V\t. (0 .Q.n 0... .a- 0\/ 

.. l= C!A } t:;- ,~~D 

'S~~~~ 

~ ..... -0.-- (J-pCJ.-. V'f \1 

uv- h>---. r- p ff /1-t f-1 ......... i/Y\ r nn ' fl., t.lr...l 1-r... (@ @<.Ja. c:; 0 J 

 r'\ f.PA ' / J-1/i.b, • ~ , J 

 

/)if I 0/\. ' rn 0 f\.1 (:,..-{ L d rJ... e..JJ(J\.. • u Cn/ 

N 

fPA I .J.JEf\ I ~\b~tv-.. :=t\AM~A ( , ~~-_~ ~ 

~~I 

~L-- ANJJt""Q.~.)''I tJ , t.I'L. a, ~~ ,("~..J 

/}'1~N'f~fl) 

~·;~,Je 

,npv~/Z>. co,....., 'V 

r.(f1 /or·? vv ·-1-.., V'"' o -r "' ..r --2-

r~ <',.., 1"1 pI(" c.. . ~ .xr-./ 

'vr1 P r .P A- /PJZ..I) u 

I til A-( ~ ePtJ:J 

M' I 

 S L 

~ 

 /'IVN/~C/ i& 

 1 yr,.. f'nP/""" 

F~.H I
# Performers chronicle African American history through music

/ Published Feb. 22, 2017
PHILADELPHIA,
No. 00-6954.

#### Duarte-Vestar *v.*Wisconsin.

Ct. App. Wis. Certiorari denied.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000433 03-DEC-2015 08:43 AM
114 STAT. 2360 PUBLIC LAW 106–508—NOV. 13, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5239:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

Sept. 25, considered and passed House.

Oct. 11, considered and passed Senate, amended.

Oct. 30, House concurred in Senate amendment.

WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 36 (2000):

Nov. 13, Presidential statement.

Æ

Public Law 106–508

106th Congress

An Act

To provide for increased penalties for violations of the Export Administration Act

of 1979, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That section

20 of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2419)

is amended by striking ‘‘August 20, 1994’’ and inserting ‘‘August

20, 2001’’.

Approved November 13, 2000.

Nov. 13, 2000

[H.R. 5239]
#### J. D. MYERS v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 49814.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

July 27, 1977.

Morris & Coats, Patricia A. Coats, Cleveland, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Henry T. Wingate, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, P. J., SMITH and LEE, JJ., and JAMES D. HESTER, Commissioner.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Bolivar County; J. C. Feduccia, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

GILLESPIE, C. J., took no part.
Order entered February 17, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00331-CR

No. 05-14-00332-CR

No. 05-14-00333-CR

No. 05-14-00334-CR

NEKO EARSY BOYKIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F13-12601-J, F13-58095-J, F13-58096-J, F13-58097-J

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeals.

On January 12, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why 

appellant’s brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to 

pursue the appeals; (2) appellant is indigent and represented by court-appointed counsel Nanette 

Hendrickson; (3) Ms. Hendrickson’s explanation for the delay in filing the brief is her workload; 

and (4) Ms. Hendrickson requested thirty days from the February 10, 2015 findings to file 

appellant’s brief.
We ORDER appellant to file his brief by MARCH 13, 2015. We note the brief was 

originally due September 25, 2014, and appellant has already been granted one thirty-day 

extension of time to file the brief. It is now four months overdue. Accordingly, no further 

extensions will be granted. If the brief is not the date specified, the Court will utilize the 

available remedies, which may include order that Nanette Hendrickson be removed as counsel 

and that new counsel be appointed. 

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable Gracie Lewis, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 3, and to counsel for all 

parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
; Generated by FastSum - an extremely fast checksum utility.
; Go to www.fastsum.com to get your own copy for free.
;
D155A9438F15C52C1A6040F0617A9AB8 *LarVehDyn 1.wmv
0E79EC7A3ED54A21EEA6087D4C9AD305 *LarVehDyn 2.wmv
CDBCEF0EA103A94C6C59C26F9B00CD2E *LarVehDyn 3.wmv
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 158 (Friday, August 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21625]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Jackson Heart Study Feasibility Study (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Date: September 3, 1997.
    Time: 2:00 p.m.
    Place: Two Rockledge Center, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7214, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
    Contact Person: C. James Scheirer, Ph.D., Two Rockledge Center, 
Room 7214, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, (301) 435-
0266.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    This meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to 
this meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations 
imposed by the grant/contract review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.837, Heart 
and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; and 
93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes 
of Health)

    Dated: August 8, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-21625 Filed 8-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of First Century Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that to such officers knowledge, the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                           
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------
|Dated: March 26, 2007 |  |                           
|                      | 
|                      |  | /s/ J. Ronald Hypes       
|                      |  | J. Ronald Hypes, Treasurer
|                      |  | (Chief Financial Officer) 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### Stanley MA, et al., petitioners, v. Charles W. BROWN, et ux.

No. 98-261.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 13, 1998.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Opinion issued February 26 , 201 9

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01

- 1 9

- 00 097

- C V

——————————— IN RE ARNOLD BALDWIN, INDI VIDUALLY AND AS TRUS TEE FOR

THE RIL FAMILY TRUST , Rel ator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Arnold Baldwin, Individually and as Trustee for the RIL Family

Trust, ha s filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking an order to reverse the

trial court ’s order granting partial default judgment

. 1

1 The underlying case is Robert H. Lewis, Alma Deshone Lewis Moore, Harold Essie Lewis Jr., N

icole Monique Lewis, Dettick Mosley and Desmine Mosley v. Arnold Baldwin, Individually and as Trustee of the RIL Family Trust
, cause number 18DCV0659 , pending in the 344th Judicial District Court of Chambers County, Texas, the Honorable Randy McDonald pres iding

.2

We den y relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX

. R. A PP . P.
52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Countiss

.
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Commission File Nos. 33-58653, 33-30549,33-03169, 33-49422, 333-107065, 333-107668 and 333-127647) of Hartmarx Corporation of our report dated February 13, 2006 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

February 13, 2006
EXHIBIT 32

 Certifications Required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned hereby certifies in his or her capacity as an officer of PennFed
Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company") that the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in
such report.

                                    By: /s/ Joseph L. LaMonica
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Joseph L. LaMonica
                                       President and Chief
                                       Executive Officer

                                       Date: November 9, 2006



                                    By: /s/ Claire M. Chadwick
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Claire M. Chadwick
                                       Senior Executive Vice President,
                                       Chief Financial Officer and Controller

                                       Date: November 9, 2006


                                       31
----

----

**UNITED      STATES**

**SECURITIES      AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Washington,      D.C. 20549**

----

**Form      8-K**

**Current      Report**

----

**Pursuant      to Section 13 or 15(d)**

**of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

**February      6, 2007**

**Date      of Report (Date of earliest event reported)**

**FNB      Financial Services Corporation**

**(Exact      name of registrant as specified in its charter)**

**Commission      file number: **
***000-13086***

----

| **North                Carolina**                           | **56-1382275**                                          |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| **(State                of incorporation)**                 | **(I.R.S.                Employer Identification No.)** |
|                                                        |                                                    |
| **1501                Highwoods Boulevard, Suite 400**      |                                                    |
| **Greensboro,                North Carolina**               | **27410**                                               |
| **(Address                of principal executive offices)** | **(Zip                Code)**                           |

**(336)      369-0900**

**(**
**Registrant's**
**      telephone number, including area code)**

----

----

**ITEM      8.01.   **
**OTHER      EVENTS**

**Item 2.02:      Results of Operations and Financial Condition**

**ITEM      9.01(c):   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND      EXHIBITS**

----

**S       I  G  N  A  T  U  R  E**

|   |                                                         |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | **FNB                FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION**        |
|   | (Registrant)                                                 |
|   |                                                         |
|   | By:                /s/ K.                Dwight Willoughby   |
|   |                                                         |
|   | K.                Dwight Willoughby                          |
|   | Senior                Vice President,                        |
|   | Chief Accounting                Officer, and Controller |
**NEWS
      RELEASE**





**FOR
      RELEASE: IMMEDIATELY**





**WAYNE
      SAVINGS BANCSHARES, INC. ANNOUNCES STOCK REPURCHASE
      PROGRAM**





Wooster,
      Ohio (December 21, 2007) – The
      Board of Directors of Wayne Savings Bancshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:WAYN), the stock
      holding company parent of Wayne Savings Community Bank, has authorized a new
      stock repurchase program amounting to 2.5%, or 77,029 shares, of the 3,081,142
      shares expected  to be outstanding at the conclusion of the current
      repurchase program.  43,864 shares remain to be repurchased under the
      current repurchase program.  At the conclusion of the current 5%
      program, announced on December 28, 2006, 162,165 shares will have been
      repurchased.  Stock repurchases will be made from time to time as
      market conditions warrant, through open market purchases, unsolicited negotiated
      transactions, or in such other manner deemed appropriate by
      management.





At
      September 30, 2007, Wayne Savings
      Bancshares, Inc. had total assets of $398.9 million, deposits of $322.6 million,
      and stockholders’ equity of $34.1 million, or 8.54% of total
      assets.





Established
      in 1899, Wayne Savings Community Bank, the wholly owned subsidiary of Wayne
      Savings Bancshares, Inc., has eleven full-service banking locations in the
      communities of Wooster, Ashland, Millersburg, Rittman, Lodi, North Canton,
      and
      Creston, Ohio.








*Statements
      contained in this news release which are not historical facts may be
      forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities
      Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are subject
      to
      risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially
      from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors. Factors which
      could
      result in material variations include, but are not limited to, changes in
      interest rates which could affect net interest margins and net interest income,
      competitive factors which could affect net interest income and noninterest
      income, changes in demand for loans, deposits and other financial services
      in
      the Company's market area; changes in asset quality, general economic conditions
      as well as other factors discussed in documents filed by the Company with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time. The Company undertakes
      no
      obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or
      circumstances that occur after the date on which such statements were
      made.*





**CONTACT
                PERSON:**
            **H.
                Stewart Fitz Gibbon III****Executive
                Vice President****Chief
                Financial Officer****(330)
                264-5767**
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of ExperTelligence, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Francisco Terreforte, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
  Date: February 28, 2011
 
 By: /s/ J. Francisco Terreforte
 J. Francisco Terreforte
 Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ExperTelligence, Inc. and will be retained by ExperTelligence, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case: 11-10552 Date Filed: 10/25/2012 Page: 1 of 8 
Case: 11-10552 Date Filed: 10/25/2012 Page: 2 of 8 
Case: 11-10552 Date Filed: 10/25/2012 Page: 3 of 8 
Case: 11-10552 Date Filed: 10/25/2012 Page: 4 of 8 
Case: 11-10552 Date Filed: 10/25/2012 Page: 5 of 8 
Case: 11-10552 Date Filed: 10/25/2012 Page: 6 of 8 
Case: 11-10552 Date Filed: 10/25/2012 Page: 7 of 8 
Case: 11-10552 Date Filed: 10/25/2012 Page: 8 of 8
# Heavy Lifting: Landing Support Platoon refines external lift capabilities

/ Published Dec. 14, 2016
CAMP HANSEN, Okinawa, Japan, Marines with Landing Support Platoon, Combat Logistics Battalion 31, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, conducted annual helicopter support team and external load lift training Dec. 5-8, 2016, working with pilots from Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 262 (Reinforced). Landing Support Platoon’s combined training with VMM-262 (Rein.) provides a crucial capability to the 31st MEU during humanitarian aid and disaster relief operations (HADR). During the training, the MV-22B Osprey pilots conducted external load lifts of critical supplies, including sand bags and tactical vehicle tires.Ospreys can lift external loads of up to 12,500 pounds, which are chained to the underside of the aircraft. The landing support specialists practiced meticulous rigging techniques to secure loads to help maintain a high safety standard, according to Cpl. Zachary Stevens, a landing support specialist with the platoon.“Our gear is rated to carry weights well beyond what the aircraft can lift to keep us within our safety boundaries,” said Stevens. “The nets maintain the integrity of the load and keep everything held in tightly.”The landing support specialists work in teams to properly secure external loads to aircraft and monitor them during transport. The pilots maintain constant communication with the Landing Support Platoon Marines to ensure the external loads are carried safely, according to Stevens.External load lift transports are normally used to move critical equipment from ship to shore quickly, with little room for error. When speed is essential, as it is during HADR, external load transport is often the best or only option, according to Staff Sgt. Davon Hammond, the platoon chief.“This training gives the Marines a chance to practice ship-to-shore and shore-to-ship external lift procedures in a controlled environment,” said Hammond. “In humanitarian aid and disaster relief operations, external lifts are often the only way to transport heavy equipment and machinery to units in country when ground transport routes are impassable.According to Hammond, training is taken very seriously because the equipment transported is needed to conduct HADR operations, including water purification and food distribution. “External lifts require precision, attention to detail and strict holding to safety standards, every time,” said Hammond. “We take this training seriously because in a real-world situation that requires these lifts, lives are often hanging in the balance.”*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Marines website.*