alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 9494.

#### National Biscuit Company et al. *v.*A. A. Douglass et al., Partners.

(Decided June 5, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Richland county.

*Messrs. Jermer & Weldon,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Donnell, Marriott & Bissman,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Crew, Summers and Spear, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of VillageEDOCS, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that::




(1)The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  November 16,
2009
              /s/ K. Mason ConnerChief
      Executive Officer




A SIGNED
ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER DOCUMENT
AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT APPEARS
IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED
BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO VILLAGEEDOCS, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY
VILLAGEEDOCS, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR
ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### Johnie James LATHAM, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. DD-196.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 21, 1978.

Rehearing Denied July 26, 1978.

*128Woodburn S. Wesley, Jr., of Cotton *&*Wesley, Fort Walton Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Patti Eng-lander, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

MILLS, Judge.

Latham was charged with grand larceny. He pled nolo contendere. The trial court withheld adjudication and placed him on probation. Approximately eight months later, Latham was charged with violation of probation. Following a hearing, the court found that he had violated the terms of his probation. Latham was adjudicated guilty of grand larceny and sentenced to three years imprisonment. He appeals.

Latham’s contention that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress is without merit. The exclusionary rule does not apply to probation revocation hearings. *Croteau v. State,*334 So.2d 577 (Fla.1976).

Latham’s argument that the trial court erred in failing to state in writing the evidence relied upon and the reasons for revoking Latham’s probation is without merit. The Circuit Court is a court of record, therefore, the court reporter’s transcript of the probation revocation hearing provides an opportunity for review of the revocation hearing superior to the written statement of evidence and reasons required by *Gagnon v. Scarpelli,*411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973). *Singletary v. State,*290 So.2d 116 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). We have a full transcript of the revocation hearing before us in this appeal.

Lastly, Latham urges that the court erred in revoking his probation because the State failed to identify him at the hearing. We have read the transcript of the revocation hearing and though the identification of Latham was not as formal as would be required at a trial, at a revocation hearing which does not require strict adherence to substantive and procedural rights, it was sufficient.

We affirm the judgment.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, J., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1331 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1331

 To amend the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to change the date of 
   implementation of country of origin labeling to January 30, 2006.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 29, 2005

Mr. Johnson (for himself, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Burns, 
Mr. Thune, Mr. Bingaman, and Mr. Baucus) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to change the date of 
   implementation of country of origin labeling to January 30, 2006.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY OF COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELING.

    Section 285 of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 
1638d) is amended by striking ``September 30, 2006'' and inserting 
``January 30, 2006''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32
                                                                      ----------

                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SLS International, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of John Gott, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael L. Maples,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ John Gott
-----------------------
John Gott
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2005

/s/ Michael L. Maples
-----------------------
Michael L. Maples
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2005

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 162 (Thursday, August 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22193]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


 Notice of Cancellation of Public Meeting of the Kentucky 
Advisory Committee

     Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules 
and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting 
of the Kentucky Advisory Committee to the Commission which was to have 
convened at 1:00 p.m. and adjourned at 5:00 p.m. on September 4, 1997, 
at the Louisville Free Public Library, Western Branch, 604 S. 10th 
Street, Louisville, Kentucky, has been canceled. The original notice 
for the meeting was announced in the  Federal Register on August 7, 
1997, FR Doc. 97-20835, 62 FR 42483.
     Persons desiring additional information should contact Bobby D. 
Doctor, Director of the Southern Regional Office, 404-562-7000 (TDD 
404-562-7004).

     Dated at Washington, DC, August 12, 1997.
 Carol-Lee Hurley,
 Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-22193 Filed 8-20-97; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6335-01-P-M
No. 99-1088.

#### Bryan R. *v.*Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York et al.

Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. Certiorari denied.
# DLA Distribution Norfolk’s Pier Operations Team assists Navy 

/ Published Aug. 7, 2017
NORFOLK, Virginia, The diversity of DLA Distribution Norfolk, Virginia operations allows for a great team of personnel with specialized skills, customer focus and a passion for achieving excellence working throughout the organization. One of these specialized groups is the Pier Operations Team. The team is responsible for providing loading and offloading services from Navy ships. Using a mobile crane with a 75-ton capacity, DLA Distribution Norfolk crane operators, riggers, blockers and bracers are consistently providing safe, timely and responsive support to a variety of Navy and Marine Corps units.   On July 7, the DLA Distribution Norfolk Pier Operations Team assisted the Norfolk Air Mobility Command Air Terminal with an urgent requirement to fly a 21-ton sonar dome via a C5 cargo aircraft in support of a Navy guided missile destroyer currently deployed to Japan. However, the sonar dome was not sufficiently braced for safe air travel and needed to be lifted in order to accomplish the additional work. The lift, requiring a crane, needed to be done on a short timeline in order to make the scheduled flight of the C5. The Air Mobility team made the call, requesting assistance from the DLA Distribution Norfolk Pier Operations Team. The team immediately relocated their mobile crane and slings to the air terminal.  Working quickly and safely, the Pier Operations Team completed the necessary rigging and lifted the sonar dome in order for additional bracing material to be put in place.  This allowed the sonar dome to be loaded onboard the C5 with the proper fit and without any shifting during transport. The team's ability to quickly respond to the emergent situation resulted in an immediate cost savings of $75,000, prevented a 15-day flight delay and reduced delays to the overseas shipyard's maintenance schedule.  "The customer focus and superior skills displayed by the Pier Operations Team always results in amazing support to the ships, and safety and responsiveness are always given top priority. The unique capability they add to the DLA Distribution toolbox is an invaluable asset,” said DLA Distribution Norfolk commander, Navy Capt. Andy Matthews. “It is a testament to their resilience and pride in service that ensures that they are always prepared to "save the day" under unusual circumstances like this one."
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4838

_____________________________
M ICHAEL A. T ORREY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jan Shackelford , Judge

. October 7, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. O STERHAUS , B ILBREY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Michael A. Torrey, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxl er, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
#### Michael Leonard JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1165.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 21, 1978.

John H. Lipinski, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William M. Grodnick, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was found guilty of involuntary sexual battery by a jury and was sentenced to one year in the Dade County stockade. On this appeal from the judgment, he has presented five points, four of which are as follows: (1) The evidence was not sufficient to show lack of consent to the intercourse. (2) A new trial should be granted because of comments by the prosecuting attorney in closing argument. (3) The court erred in allowing the introduction into evidence of a pretrial statement of the codefendant. (4) The court erred in admitting into evidence a pretrial statement of this defendant. The fifth point is of suffi*201cient importance that it should be set out in its entirety:

> “Whether *the State*committed reversible error in offering into evidence testimony that the defendant’s brother offered the victim’s boyfriend money to testify for the defense.” [Emphasis added]

The first four points do not present reversible error. The evidence was conflicting but sufficient to prove lack of consent depending upon which of the witnesses told the truth. The comments here objected to were in the main, not objected to in the trial, and in no instance were the comments so objectionable to require a new trial. The pretrial statements were properly admitted where there was no motion to sever the trial of the two defendants and the statements were voluntary.

The admission, over objection, of a witness’s testimony that someone other than the defendant, or someone not shown to be acting with defendant’s knowledge, offered that witness $200.00 to testify falsely for the defendant is grounds for the granting of a mistrial, and the denial thereof would be reversible error. *Coleman v. State,*335 So.2d 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). No error appears in this case because the action complained of (the offering of evidence) was not an action of the court. No objection nor motion for mistrial appears in the record. Our review of the circumstances of the offer convinces us that the defendant was not deprived of a fair trial. Therefore, no fundamental error appears.

Affirmed.
# DLA command sergeant major shares DLA story with CASCOM enlisted leaders

/ Published Feb. 21, 2017

Among the small percentage of service members who attain the rank of E-9, the military’s highest enlisted rank, a few exceptional individuals serve in an even higher capacity. In the Army, the command sergeant major, or CSM, is the most senior enlisted leader in the command, assigned to advocate for the enlisted soldiers and advise the commanding officer in all matters pertaining to enlisted personnel.

The Defense Logistics Agency’s senior enlisted leader, Army Command Sgt. Major Charles Tobin, addressed about 60 senior enlisted personnel at the Combined Arms Support Command in Fort Lee, Virginia, Feb. 16. The group consisted mostly of E-8 and E-9 service members representing the quartermaster, transportation and ordnance specialties. Topics of his discussion ranged from a DLA overview, to advice on navigating the joint environment to thoughts on military life and career.

“I had no idea I would become the command sergeant major for DLA,” Tobin said. “It’s not something you can really plan for.”

He went on to advise the soldiers not to worry about their next assignment. “Just do the best you can in your current position. Always give 110 percent and one day, you may be selected to become a CSM.”

Tobin went so far as to predict that someone sitting in the audience would one day serve as CSM for CASCOM. “Always bring your experience with the warfighter to your job,” Tobin said. “And be ready to make the right decisions when you become a sergeant major.”

Tobin shared the four principles he has used to guide his 34-year career:
      - Trust: Show confidence in the folks around you.
      - Relationships: Respect everyone and maintain strong relationships. 
      - Reputation: Take care of your people and give every assignment your all.
      - Credibility: Your integrity and trustworthiness are your most important assets.

Tobin also advised the group to adopt his “three A’s” style of leadership: approachable, accessible and available.

In telling the DLA story, Tobin described the agency as a desirable joint assignment for enlisted soldiers with logistics backgrounds. To emphasize his remarks, Tobin invited Army Sgt. First Class Yadriana Kavitz to address the group about her job working in the Joint Logistics Operations Center at DLA. Kavitz, in the 12th year of her Army career, started working for DLA about six months ago.

Tobin warned about soldiers getting too comfortable at DLA, however. “If you serve time at DLA, I will not extend your stay here and I don’t want you to retire here,” he said. “I want to send you back to your service so you can take the DLA story back to your units.”

Tobin ended his 90-minute presentation with a personal story about the importance of family to a military career. “I want you to go home tonight and thank your family for the sacrifices they make for your career and for our country,” he said. “It’s important that we always remember to do that.”
No. 99-7855.

#### Petties *v.*United States Postal Service et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ERIC DAROSA, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2027

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed May 3, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pasco County; Mary Handsel,

Judge.

Eric DaRosa, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and VILLANTI and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 162 (Thursday, August 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44465-44466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22213]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 1417; Project No. 1835]


Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District; Nebraska 
Public Power District; Notice of Informal Settlement Conference

August 15, 1997.
    An informal settlement conference will be convened on Tuesday and 
Wednesday, September 23 and 24, 1997, at 10:00 a.m., at the offices of 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC, 20426. Subsequent meetings will be scheduled as 
necessary. The purpose of these off-the-record meetings is to explore 
which issues remain contested and to work toward achieving settlement 
on any contested issues. Discussion will cover any proposals for 
settlement that may be presented. Any person appearing at the 
conference in a representative capacity must be authorized to negotiate 
and, to the extent authorized by law, settle matters addressed at the 
conference.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), is invited to send a 
representative to the conference. Any party wishing to make a 
presentation or needing additional information should contact Merrill 
F. Hathaway at (202) 208-0825, or John A. Schnagl at (202)

[[Page 44466]]

219-2661. Initial presentations will be limited to 10 minutes duration.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22213 Filed 8-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[110th Congress Public Law 443]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ443.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 5008]]

Public Law 110-443
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 300 Vine Street in New Lenox, Illinois, as the ``Jacob M. Lowell Post 
       Office Building''. <<NOTE: Oct. 21, 2008 -  [H.R. 6681]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. JACOB M. LOWELL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 300 Vine Street in New Lenox, Illinois, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Jacob M. Lowell Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Jacob M. 
Lowell Post Office Building''.

    Approved October 21, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6681:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            Sept. 17, 18, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 30, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 162 (Thursday, August 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44475-44476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22150]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Conversion of CDC Voice/Fax Information Service to Toll Free 
Access

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of disease and health 
risk information by voice and fax as a toll-free service to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dottie Knight, Information Resources 
Management Office, Office of Program Support, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mail/Stop C-04, 
Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone: 404-639-2250.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Consistent with OMB A-130 circular, Section 
8.a.(6)(j), Federal agencies are required to: ``Provide adequate notice 
when initiating, substantially modifying, or terminating significant 
information dissemination products * * *.''
    The CDC Voice/Fax Information Service (VIS) allows any caller 
access to the most current health related information using a touch-
tone telephone. The CDC VIS has been in operation for approximately 9 
years and in the most recent 12 month period, it has received nearly 1 
million telephone

[[Page 44476]]

calls, provided automated voice-response information to those callers, 
and provided 1.5 million pages of automated fax information. 
Information is provided in several levels of detail and complexity in 
order to reach a broad audience more effectively including the general 
public and health care professionals.
    During August 1997, the Voice/Fax Information Service (VIS) will be 
converting to toll-free access for callers to ensure health and 
prevention information availability to all audiences. Callers will 
continue to be able to access information via voice-response and fax-
on-demand. The new number for information via voice response is 1-888-
CDC-FACTS (1-888-232-3228) and 1-888-CDC-FAXX (1-888-232-3299) for 
information via fax. In the future, CDC will be offering all of the 
information on health topics via TDD services for the hearing-impaired 
and several languages. In addition, much of this same information is 
available through the Internet on CDC's web site at: <a href="http://
www.cdc.gov">http://
www.cdc.gov</a>.

    Dated: August 15, 1997.
Joseph R. Carter
Acting Associate Director for Management and Operations, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 97-22150 Filed 8-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0554

_________________

GARY TAYLOR,

 Plaintiff and Appellant,

 v.

GEORGE ANTHONY TAYLOR and

ANNE MARIE TAYLOR,

 Defendants and Appellees.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Luke Berger, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 21 2024

08/21/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0554