alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 165 (Tuesday, August 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22647]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Revision of National Environmental Policy Act Procedures; Request 
for Comments

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Revision of National Environmental Policy Act Procedures, 
Request for Comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) is requesting comments from 
agencies and the public concerning its revisions to its procedures 
under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Once final these 
policies would apply to the activities of the National Park Service in 
administering units of the National Park System as well as other 
activities. The policies available for review consist of a draft 
Director's Order which broadly describes the authorization of and 
responsibility for the development of the policies and a draft handbook 
that describes how the NPS will carry out its responsibilities under 
the National Environmental Policy Act and related laws. A field guide 
will be developed in the future that will supply additional guidance 
for writing documents and carrying out analysis under NEPA.

DATES: Comments must be submitted by October 3, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Documents can be requested from and comments should be sent 
to: National Park Service Environmental Quality Division, Room 2749, 
1849 C Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240. Comments can also be sent 
electronically to the following internet address: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b313a38343904043334343c373a353f1b352b28753c342d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c1aba0a2aea39e9ea9aeaea6ada0afa581afb1b2efa6aeb7">[email protected]</span></a>. Electronic copies of the draft documents can 
be downloaded from the internet at the NPS's web page at <a href="http://
www.nps.gov">http://
www.nps.gov</a>.
    For further information Contact: Jacob J. Hoogland, Chief, 
Environmental Quality Division, National Park Service, Room 2749, 1849 
C Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240. Telephone (202)208-5214. 
Internet address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c1aba0a2aea39e9ea9aeaea6ada0afa581afb1b2efa6aeb7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e882898b878ab7b78087878f8489868ca886989bc68f879e">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 7, 1997.
Abigail Miller,
Deputy Associate Director, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science.
[FR Doc. 97-22647 Filed 8-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Ex parte Terry SIMPSON.

SC 77-321.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 24, 1978.

MADDOX, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>     1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-01-1999
<CASH>                                        1104
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 4154
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                  10359
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                        2611
<DEPRECIATION>                                1539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               31548
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        22010
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       590
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      4
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 31548
<SALES>                                      62321
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             62321
<CGS>                                        43802
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                61442
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             802
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                879
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (244)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           1123
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                  1123
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .02



</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 6560

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.
MARVIN ALEXANDER WRIGHT,

Defendant

- Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Beaufort

. Richard Mark Gergel , District Judge. ( 9:11

- cr

- 00350

- RMG

- 1 )

Submitted : January 21, 2022 Decided: March 7, 2022

Before MOTZ and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , an d SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

ON BRIEF: Jeremy A. Thompson, Assistant Federal Public Defender, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. M. Rhett DeHart, Acting United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, Nick Bianchi, Assistant United States Attorney , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Marvin Alexander Wright appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)( A)(i), as amended by the First
Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. Upon review,
we discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s determination that Wright failed to
establish extraordinary and compelling reasons warranting his early release. See United

States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329

- 30 (4th Cir. ), cert. denied , 142 S. Ct. 383 ( 2021)
(providing standard of review and outlining steps for evaluating compassionate release
motions); see also United States v. M cCoy , 981 F.3d 271, 282 n.7 (4th Cir. 2020)
(providing that, although courts may not treat U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual

§ 1B1.13 , p.s. (2018) as binding, the policy statement “r emains helpful guidance even
when motions are filed by defendants” ). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-50240

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RUBEN DARIO MUNOZ-PACHECO, also known as Ruben Munoz Pacheco,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:11-CR-2483-1

Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ruben Dario MunozPacheco has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Munoz-Pacheco has not filed a response. We have reviewed

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue

for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 17, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-50240 Document: 00512085532 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2012
EXHIBIT
      32.1





SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Global Food Technologies, Inc.
      ("Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), the undersigned, in the
      capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to their
      knowledge:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to Global Food Technologies, Inc. and will
        be
        retained by Global Food Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated
      June 11,
      2008




/s/
      Keith
      Meeks





Keith
      Meeks, President and Chief Executive Officer




/s/
      Marshall F Sparks


Marshall
      F. Sparks, Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50686 Summary Calendar

DAVID JOHNSTON, Individually and as representative of the Estate of Richard J. Johnston; GLORIA JOHNSTON, Plaintiff-Appellants,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-94-CV-110

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * David and Gloria Johnston appeal the take-nothing judgment dismissing their wrongful death claims, filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680, based on cardiac surgery performed on the decedent, Richard Johnston, by the Government’s agents at the Brooke Army Medical Center. The Johnstons alleged that the operating surgeon, Dr. Greg Bowman, had negligently damaged Johnston’s phrenic nerves during theNo. 97-50686 -2- cardiac surgery, thereby paralyzing Johnston’s diaphragm and causing his subsequent death. After conducting a bench trial, the district court held that the Johnstons did not meet their burden of proving that Dr. Bowman had caused Johnston’s death and had breached the required standard of care. We review the district court’s findings of fact for clear error, and conclusions of law de novo . Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a); Hayes v. United States , 899 F.2d 438, 443 (5th Cir. 1990). After reviewing the evidence, we do not have a definite and firm conviction that the district court mistakenly found no negligence on the part of the government’s agents. Consequently, we may not overturn the district court’s ruling denying the Johnstons relief on their negligence claims. See Anderson v. City of Bessemer City , 470 U.S. 564, 573 (1985). The district court also did not err in rejecting the Johnstons’ spoliation assertion since they point to no facts showing that the government’s agents intentionally or negligently destroyed evidence. See Brewer v. Dowling , 862 S.W.2d 156, 159-60 (Tex. App. 1993, writ denied). The district court’s refusal to apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was proper since laymen do not generally comprehend the techniques of CABG surgery. See Haddock v. Arnspiger , 793 S.W.2d 948, 951 (Tex. 1990). Finally, our review indicates that the district court did not misapply the FTCA and did not create a subjective exception of unavoidable accident to the standard of care for surgeons.No. 97-50686 -3- The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
114 STAT. 1398 PUBLIC LAW 106–359—OCT. 26, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 116:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

Oct. 26, considered and passed House and Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–359

106th Congress

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

106–275, is further amended by striking the date specified in section

106(c) and inserting ‘‘October 27, 2000’’.

Approved October 26, 2000.

Ante, p. 806, 810,

1073, 1318, 1397.

Oct. 26, 2000

[H.J. Res. 116]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               NOV-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                    NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                          $ 1,051,144
<SECURITIES>                        154,590
<RECEIVABLES>                       430,843
<ALLOWANCES>                         48,512
<INVENTORY>                          21,102
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  1,668,043
<PP&E>                            1,106,771
<DEPRECIATION>                      526,572
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    3,269,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               564,623
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                             25,382
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                        2,339,646
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      3,269,857
<SALES>                           1,888,083
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  3,623,911
<CGS>                             1,478,706
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     3,530,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    181,386
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     29,090
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   37,464
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     274,439
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 274,439
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        274,439
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .01
        

</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 26, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00840

- CR

IN RE Matthew T . JOINER

,

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial C ourt No. 2014CR10594

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The Declaration of Matthew Joiner is hereby D ENIED.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNES S WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 26th day of January, 2017

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Bellows Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2004 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  May 13, 2004
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

AUSTIN 

February 6, 

Hon. H. L ,Roberaonr -+-“-----~--~~~~~~~.“~ .-.m, 3..-.... 

County Adorney 

I 

:~ :;.... 

Wlnkler County 

Kermit, Texas 

Dear Sirr 

Aoknoalddglng re 

Qth, the attention of this 

oalled therein to the foil 

letter of January 

respeotfully 

II whloh the eleotlon 

ed was legal and that the 

al eleotlon for said ofdldate, we respeotfully 

hat suoh oandldate 1s duly 

slder that this question 

an by entertaining suoh preVery tNly yOUra 

APPROVED:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of License Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,
2003 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  November 10, 2003
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 13

- 447 V

Filed: August 13, 2014

Not for P ublication

*************************************

R OBERT P. ZIMMERMAN, *

*

Petitioner

, * Attorneys’ fees and costs decision b ased on

* s tipulation of f

act

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Diana L. Stadelnikas Sedar

, Sarasota

, FL, for petitioner.

Lynn E. Ricciardella , Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS ’ FEES AND COSTS 1

On August 13 , 2014 , the parties filed a stipulation of fact in which they agreed on an

appropriate amount for attorneys’ fees and costs in this case

.

I n accordance with t he General Order #9 r equiremen t, petitioner assert s that he did not

incur any costs in pursuit of his petition. Petitioner submitted his request for attorneys’ fees and

costs to respondent. During informal discussions, respondent ra ised objections t o certain items in

petitioner’ s app lication

. Based on these objections, petitioner amend s his application for

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation f or the special master’ s action in this

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal

Claims’ s website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899,

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearl y

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and

move to redact such information prior to the document = s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,

agrees that the identified material fits with in the banned categories listed above, the special master shall

redact such material from public access.2

attor ne ys’ fees and costs to $1 3

, 450 .00

. Respondent does not object to this amount. The

undersigned finds this amount to be reasonable. Accordingly, the court awards $ 1 3

, 450 .00

, representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs. The award shall be in the form of a

chec k payable jointly to petitioner and Maglio, Christopher & Toale, P.A.

, in the amount of

$ 1 3

, 45 0.00

.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the

court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 13, 2014 s/ Laura D. Millman

b y Nora Beth Dorsey

Laura D. Millman

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party , either separately or

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.