alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Donald "Don" Bruce

### Deputy Commander, DLA Europe & Africa

### 

### 

As of 26 April, 2021, Don is serving as the Deputy Commander of DLA Europe and Africa (DLA E&A), located at Kleber Kaserne in Kaiserslautern, Germany.  DLA E&A is responsible for synchronization of Agency activities in the U.S. European Command and U.S. Africa Command areas of responsibility across all functions in support of Warfighter and Whole of Government partners.  

Born in Lowell, Massachusetts in 1959.  Enlisted in the Marine Corps in 1976.  Served in the active Marine Corps Reserve through college.  Graduated with a BS in Business Administration from Norwich University (Military College of Vermont) in 1981.  Commissioned in the U.S. Marine Corps upon graduation from college. 

From 1981 until 2004, held billets with increasing responsibility as a logistics officer at the Battalion, Regiment, Division/Force Service Support Group and Marine Expeditionary Force Levels.  Also served a joint tour of duty at HQ DLA as the Operations Center, Pacific Team Chief and a tour of duty in acquisition program management at Marine Corps Systems Command.  Held billets responsible for planning, execution and control of all functional areas of logistics to include supply and maintenance operations, deployment and distribution, health service support, engineering, logistics services and operational contract support. 

Retired from the Marine Corps in October 2004 and began service as a civilian logistician in the J3 at HQ DLA.  Initially served two years as a contractor in the Joint Logistics Operations Center (JLOC).  Converted to a government civilian position in 2006 and served in the J37 as a Distribution Action Officer.  Detailed to be the Deputy of the Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) Retrograde Support Team in 2007.  Deployed to Iraq and served as the lead planner for drawdown and retrograde on the Multi-National Force Iraq/U.S. Forces Iraq J4 staff.  Transferred to the Operations Center Plans Team upon return from Iraq in 2008.  Advanced to the position as Deputy for the Plans, Exercises and Readiness (PLEX-R) Branch in 2010.  Advanced to the position of JLOC Deputy in 2015 ASOC Deputy/Chief Operations Support in 2019 and stood up the Agency Synchronization and Operations Center (ASOC) in 2019. 

As a Marine attended professional military education, joint and service schools at the company and field grade level, including the Army Transportation Officer Advanced Course, USAF Airlift Operations Course, USAF Institute of Technology Logistics 301 and the Joint Staff College.  As a civilian attended the DoD Executive Leadership Development Program.  A member of several professional/civic organizations.  Received typical personal decorations as a Marine and several special act/service and performance awards as a civilian with DLA.  

Married to the former Elizabeth (Libby) Allen of Ludlow Vermont.  Three adult children, Jonathan, Alexander and Katherine.
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Daisy Ruth MAYCOCK, Appellee.

No. 77-2527.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 8, 1978.

*219Janet Reno, State’s Atty. and Milton Robbins, Asst. State’s Atty., for appellant.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, G. P. Della Fera and Paul Morris, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant filed a motion entitled “Motion to Dismiss” by which she sought an order dismissing count two of the charges against her upon the basis that “ . the Information in Count II fails to state a crime.” At the hearing on this motion, the defendant was allowed to file an affidavit which purported to proceed under Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.190(c)(4). The court then determined the factual basis for defendant’s position that the State was estopped to prosecute her for the particular crime charged in count two and, thereafter, the judge entered an order dismissing count two of the information.

We hold that this proceeding was too informal in that it did not give the State an opportunity to traverse the matters of fact alleged in the affidavit. The procedure set out in Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.190(c)(4) is a distinct remedy and in order to avoid results which are not supported by the record, the rule must be followed in particularity. Cf. the rule in *Weinstein v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Company Limited,*141 So.2d 318, 321-322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962). Therefore, the order dismissing count two is reversed without prejudice to the plaintiff to proceed under Rule 3.190(c)(4), if such is applicable.

Reversed and remanded.
This Memorial Day, reflect and remember — but also be vigilant
 
  By DLA Security and Emergency Services
  Given the recent suicide bombing in Manchester, United Kingdom, Defense Logistics Agency employees are urged to be vigilant in large public gatherings. Look out for any person whose behavior, demeanor or belongings seem unusual, and report them to law enforcement. Memorial Day celebrations are attractive targets for terrorist attacks, as are businesses that draw crowds with promotions and discounts. Large gatherings also pose distractions that can lead attendees to lose focus on those around them. In addition, events in city streets, parks and open fields are usually set up to make it easy for attendees to enter and leave. This makes such events easy targets for terrorists to attack with vehicles, firearms or bladed weapons. Although there are no reports of specific, credible threats to installations or personnel for Memorial Day weekend, it has long been a goal of terrorist groups to attack the Department of Defense again. The greatest threat is from lone domestic terrorist recruits encouraged by social media to attack independently. At Fort Hood, Texas; San Bernardino, California; Boston, Massachusetts; and Orlando, Florida, such homegrown recruits have attacked with no warning. Attacks on this particular holiday would give terrorists the opportunity to attack military personnel, civilians and law enforcement. An attack could provide worldwide media notoriety and desecrate this American patriotic holiday. Terrorist groups’ publications and social media messages have called for attacks on crowds, celebrations, shopping centers, clubs, bars, places of worship and airports. They urge followers to ram pedestrians with vehicles and then shoot or stab the survivors. Followers are told to not wait for orders and to fund their own attacks, using their own vehicles and equipment. Such attacks have increased over the last two years. This weekend, honor the memories of those who gave their lives protecting our freedom while keeping watch for those who would take it away. Report suspicious activity to the nearest law enforcement personnel. Remember:**If you see something, say something.**
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of PCS Edventures!.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), I, Robert O. Grover, President,  Chief Operating Officer, and Chief Technology Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    Date:August  16, 2010By:/s/ Robert O. GroverPresident, Chief Operating Officer, and Chief Technology Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**U.S. Corn and Soybean Weather/Production Models (92001)**
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 160 (Tuesday, August 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21927]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-687-000]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

August 13, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 7, 1997, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 
(Tennessee), P.O. Box 2511, Houston, Texas 77252, filed in Docket No. 
CP97-687-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.212 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 
157.212) for authorization to modify an existing delivery point on 
Tennessee's system, located in Tippah County, Mississippi, to provide 
continued natural gas transportation service for the City of Ripley, 
Mississippi (City of Ripley under Tennessee's blanket certificate 
issued in Docket No. CP82-413-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural 
Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request that is on file 
with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Tennessee proposes to modify an existing delivery point located at 
approximate M.P. 851-1+13.4 to eliminate operational concerns caused by 
the high velocity of flow at this location. To modify this delivery 
point Tennessee will sever and cap a common connection at the header 
which serves the cities of Ripley and Baldwin, Mississippi, remove 
approximately 8-feet of the 6-inch header pipe, install a 4-inch hot 
tap assembly and approximately 40-feet of 4-inch interconnect pipe to 
form a direct line of service to the City of Ripley. The City of 
Baldwin will continue to receive service through the existing 2-inch 
side valve. The City of Ripley will reimburse Tennessee for the 
approximate $25,000 cost.
    Tennessee states that the total volumes delivered will not exceed 
total volumes authorized prior to this request, that this modification 
is not prohibited by its existing tariff, and that Tennessee has 
sufficient capacity to accomplish deliveries without detriment or 
disadvantage to its other customers.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21927 Filed 8-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Sanitized Purity 

Data on 

Process 

Material
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: LDl S:A.1f"n-O<DC(-1:...{) 

~'fill make dl~fl!g;~,: '!~the _values ;,;·lilt! fob/..: he/(;\L you !Ill!.\ I <'iiS/tl'f' rill' lotu/,, upda!C occor~lillg/y. I( 

~:~_<_~~~not, cl:cK rr_:_r fah) mw ond then out ojt!w cl11tnged cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action 

(e.g .. Inspection. 

replacement) 

Do not include oncondition costs here 

- ............ ________ _ ! Costs per Product (e.g.;· aircraft. engine~--.------------------

. ro eller, a liance) ----.--=:----:---1--:::::---::--::::-- -.-~-.---::----.---=:--::-· Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost 

(include cost (labor+ U.S. for U.S. Fleet 

access. testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

i and cl() __ s_e-_u~)-t----"-· -----+--Products 

LO 15 

-----+- ------4---------~------4 

- --t---c------ --------1 , _ 

,!' 

--+------·-· -.. ----· :' 

I

; -····~··__j___ ___ ---

-------------f---

1 ! ! -!------+----------------.. ------

----'---------.. --------------'------· 

,-------------.. ·------------

1--------.. ------

____ T_he_k_nown number of product~ in_~~_!_n_..,.,.l.:..:ia-=-n c...:.e_: +-----=:-:-:::-=-::--1 

Total Costs of compliance for U-'-.S'=-'-._fl_. e.:..:e_t:_+---::-$-'1 ,_2_75---1 

-----·Costs covered under \V~rr~~t {i known) S 

I I ------------ ' On-Condition Costs: r-----" --------- ---- ----

Action 

(e.g .. Inspection. 

replacement) 

,---:-::-:------,:---:------------·-·- - -------.- Work-hours Labor cost 

(include access. 

testing, and closeu ) 

(@$85/hour) 

Parts Cost Cost per Product 
Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a ·'significant regulatory action''? Qi; 

YES* D NO~ 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? • 

YES* D NO~ 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. ~ 

YESO NO~ 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska . Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftranspmiation? • 

YES* 0 NO~ 

*Explanation:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 130 

To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district of Nebraska. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2005 

Mr. HAGEL (for himself and Mr. NELSON of Nebraska) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district 

of Nebraska. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISTRICT JUDGESHIP FOR THE DISTRICT OF 

4 NEBRASKA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The President shall appoint, by 

6 and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 1 addi7 tional district judge for the district of Nebraska. 

8 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

9 The table under section 133(a) of title 28, United States 
2 

•S 130 IS 

1 Code, is amended by striking the item relating to Ne2 braska and inserting the following: 

‘‘Nebraska ................................................................................ 4’’. 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21396]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
NAFTA-01562


Lithonia Lighting Conyers, Georgia; Notice of Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By letter of April 29, 1997, one of the petitioners requested 
administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of 
Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for NAFTA-
Transitional Adjustment Assistance, applicable to petition number 
NAFTA-01562. The denial notice was signed on April 1, 1997 and 
published in the Federal Register on April 15, 1997 (62 FR 18362).
    The petitioner presents evidence that the Department's 
investigation was incomplete.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of 
Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 31st day of July 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-21396 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 162 (Thursday, August 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22125]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM


Telecommunications Service Priority System Oversight Committee

AGENCY: National Communications System (NCS).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    A meeting of the Telecommunications Service Priority (TSP) System 
Oversight Committee will convene Thursday September 25, 1997 from 9 
a.m. to 12:00 a.m. The meeting will be held at Booz-Allen & Hamilton 
8283 Greensboro Drive, McLean VA.

--Opening/Administrative Remarks
--Status of the TSP Program
--Working Group Reports
--CPAS Program Update

    Anyone interested in attending or presenting additional information 
to the Committee, please contact LCDR Angela Abrahamson, Manager, TSP 
Program Office, (703) 607-4930, or Betty Hoskin (703) 607-4932 by 
September 15, 1997.
Frank M. McClelland,
Acting Federal Register Liaison Officer, National Communications 
System.
[FR Doc. 97-22125 Filed 8-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3610-05-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 162 (Thursday, August 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22211]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3329-000]


NEPOOL Executive Committee; Notice of Filing

August 15, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 23, 1997, The NEPOOL Executive Committee 
tendered for filing an amendment in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426 in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before August 26, 1997. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22211 Filed 8-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
114 STAT. 2208 PUBLIC LAW 106–490—NOV. 9, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1030:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106–898 (Comm. on Resources).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 106–174 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 145 (1999): Nov. 19, considered and passed Senate.

Vol. 146 (2000): Oct. 23, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 106–490

106th Congress

An Act

To provide that the conveyance by the Bureau of Land Management of the surface

estate to certain land in the State of Wyoming in exchange for certain private

land will not result in the removal of the land from operation of the mining

laws.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 60 BAR LAND EXCHANGE.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Sections 2201.1–2(d) and 2091.3–2(c) of title

43, Code of Federal Regulations, shall not apply in the case of

the conveyance by the Secretary of the Interior of the land described

in subsection (b) in exchange for approximately 9,480 acres of

land in Campbell County, Wyoming, pursuant to the terms of

the Cow Creek/60 Bar land exchange, WYW–143315.

(b) LAND DESCRIPTION.—The land described in this subsection

comprises the following land in Campbell and Johnson Counties,

Wyoming:

(1) Approximately 2,960 acres of land in the tract known

as the ‘‘Bill Barlow Ranch’’.

(2) Approximately 2,315 acres of land in the tract known

as the ‘‘T-Chair Ranch’’.

(3) Approximately 3,948 acres of land in the tract known

as the ‘‘Bob Christensen Ranch’’.

(4) Approximately 11,609 acres of land in the tract known

as the ‘‘John Christensen Ranch’’.

(c) SEGREGATION FROM ENTRY.—Land acquired by the United

States in the exchange under subsection (a) shall be segregated

from entry under the mining laws until appropriate land use planning is completed for the land.

Approved November 9, 2000.

Nov. 9, 2000

[S. 1030]
#### F. R. Tripler & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6197.

Invoice dated London, England, November 20, 1941.

Certified December 5, 1941.

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 7, 1942.

Entry No. 12926.

(Decided July 26, 1945)

*Jordan & Klingaman (Edward F. Jordan*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

This appeal was submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> It is stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States:

> 1. That the merchandise described on the invoice covered by the reappraisement specified above as silk squares with or without other qualifying words consists of silk fabrics exported from England.

> 2. That the market value or price at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of England for home consumption, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for Shipment to the United States, is the appraised value less the amount added under duress, and that there was no higher export value for the merchandise.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, I find and hold the proper dutiable foreign value of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the value found by the appraiser, less any amount added by the importer under duress. ■ Judgment will be rendered accordingly. • '
Exhibit 21.

Subsidiaries of First Litchfield Financial Corporation at December 31, 2007:

                                                       Percent
                                                       Owned By
                                                       First Litchfield
                              Incorporated In          Financial
Subsidiary                    The State of:            Corporation
---------                     ---------------          -----------------

The First National Bank of    Connecticut              100%
Litchfield

                                       39