alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[110th Congress Public Law 433]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ433.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 4971]]

Public Law 110-433
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To extend through 2013 the authority of the Federal Election Commission 
to impose civil money penalties on the basis of a schedule of penalties 
     established and published by the Commission. <<NOTE: Oct. 16, 
                         2008 -  [H.R. 6296]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY AUTHORITY OF 
                              FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION THROUGH 
                              2013.

    (a) Extension of Authority.--Section 309(a)(4)(C) of the Federal 
Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 437g(a)(4)(C)) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new clause:
    ``(iv) This <<NOTE: Applicability.>> subparagraph shall apply with 
respect to violations that relate to reporting periods that begin on or 
after January 1, 2000, and that end on or before December 31, 2013.''.

    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 640 of the Treasury and General 
Government Appropriations Act, 2000 (Public Law 106-58; 2 U.S.C. 437g 
note) is amended by striking subsection (c).
    (c) Effective <<NOTE: 2 USC 437g note.>> Date.--The amendments made 
by this section shall take effect as if included in the enactment of the 
Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2000.

    Approved October 16, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6296:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            July 15, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 2, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 163 (Friday, August 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22321]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3557-000]


Puget Sound Energy, Inc.; Notice of Filing

August 18, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 28, 1997, Puget Sound Energy, Inc., 
tendered for filing an amendment in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 285.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before August 29, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22321 Filed 8-21-97; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Casual Donald HAMMOND, Appellant, v. Marlyn Styles MEREDITH, formerly M. S. Hammond, Appellee.

No. 77-444.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 23, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 16, 1977.

Thomas A. Smith of Smith and Carbonell, and John N. Jenkins, Tampa, for appellant.

Stephen W. Sessums of Albritton, Ses-sums & Di Dio, Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, but the determination of arrearage for 1974 must be reduced to $13,800 in order to conform with the provisions of the property settlement agreement.

GRIMES, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.
#### Paul LITTLE v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 49679.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

July 27, 1977.

Roger Dean Harris, Biloxi, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Scherry J. LeSieur, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, P. J., and SUGG and BROOM, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; Darwin M. Maples, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

INZER, P. J., and SMITH, ROBERTSON, WALKER and LEE, JJ., concur.

GILLESPIE, C. J., took no part.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                        CERTIFICATION OF THE PRESIDENT

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    I, Ramon Chimelis, president, treasurer, and secretary, certify that
the forgoing quarterly report on Form 10-QSB containing the financial
statements set forth within fully comply with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o (d)) and that information contained in the quarterly report
presents fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Big Sky Industries I, Inc.


Date: May 20, 2003             /s/ Ramon Chimelis
                               -------------------------------
                               Ramon Chimelis
                               President



<PAGE>
----

|   | (a) | the      Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2008,      filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the      "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | information      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Joseph E. Sutaris                                   |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Joseph      E. Sutaris                                  |   |
|   | Executive      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, |   |
|   | Treasurer,      and Secretary                           |   |
|   | Date:  August 5,      2008                    |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
     DECEMBER 31, 1998 FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
     TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         3,214
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  234
<ALLOWANCES>                                   38
<INVENTORY>                                    1
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               7,567
<PP&E>                                         4,969
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,316
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 32,914
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,785
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       416
<OTHER-SE>                                     24,186
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   32,914
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               16,403
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  14,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               454
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               383
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             59
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,255
<INCOME-TAX>                                   863
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,214
<DISCONTINUED>                                 331
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,545
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.31
        

<FN>

THE VALUE FOR EPS-PRIMARY NOW REPRESENTS EPS-BASIC AND THE VALUE FOR EPS-DILUTED
REPRESENTS THE VALUE PREVIOUSLY REPORTED AS EPS-FULLY DILUTED.
</FN>


</TABLE>
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: October 2, 2014 518440 

________________________________

In the Matter of the Claim of 

GINA M. DiGENNARO,

Appellant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

COMMISSIONER OF LABOR,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: August 4, 2014

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Garry, Rose, Lynch and Devine, JJ.

__________

Gina M. DiGennaro, Bloomfield, New Jersey, appellant

pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City

(Marjorie S. Leff of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal

Board, filed September 3, 2013, which ruled that claimant was

disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits

because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Decision affirmed. No. opinion.

Lahtinen, J.P., Garry, Rose, Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur.
-2- 518440 

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs. 

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
No. 74-1396.

#### Michelin Tire Corp. *v.*Wages, Tax Commissioner, et al.

Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari granted. Reported below: 233 Ga. 712, 214 S. E. 2d 349.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 163 (Friday, August 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22309]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License; Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 
20573.

EP International Shipping, 8336 Hindry Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90045, 
Elliott C. Penalosa, Sole Proprietor.
Robert W. Cisco Custom House Broker, 416 Common Street, Suite 101, New 
Orleans, LA 70130, Robert W. Cisco, Sole Proprietor.

    Dated: August 19, 1997.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22309 Filed 8-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0701 IN THE MATTER OF, W.D., A Youth Under t he Age of 18. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 16 , 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 10 2024

07/10/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0701
Exhibit


Exhibit 10.7




ARRAY BIOPHARMA INC.


CONTROLLED EQUITY OFFERINGSM 
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO SALES AGREEMENT
November 4, 2015
Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.
499 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Reference is made to the Sales Agreement, dated March 27, 2013, between ARRAY BIOPHARMA INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and CANTOR FITZGERALD & CO. (the “Agent”), as amended by that certain Amendment No. 1 to Sales Agreement dated August 14, 2014, and as further amended by that certain Amendment No. 2 to Sales Agreement dated August 3, 2015 (as so amended, the “Sales Agreement”).  All capitalized terms used in this Amendment No. 3 to Sales Agreement among the Agent and the Company (this “Amendment”) and not otherwise defined shall have the respective meanings assigned to them in the Sales Agreement.  The Agent and the Company hereby agree as follows:
A.     Amendment to Sales Agreement.  


Sections 13(d) and 13(e) are hereby amended and restated in their entirety as follows: 
“(d)    [Reserved.]
(e)    This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless terminated pursuant to Sections 12(a), (b) or (c) above or otherwise by mutual agreement of the parties; provided, however, that any such termination by mutual agreement shall in all cases be deemed to provide that Section 8, Section 11, Section 12, Section 18 and Section 19 shall remain in full force and effect.”
B.    No Other Amendments.  Except as set forth in Part A above, all the terms and provisions of the Sales Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
 
C.    Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Delivery of an executed Amendment by one party to the other may be made by facsimile or email transmission.













If the foregoing correctly sets forth the understanding among the Company and the Agent, please so indicate in the space provided below for that purpose, whereupon this letter shall constitute a binding agreement among the Company and the Agent.


	
				
	 
	Very truly yours,

	 
	 

	 
	ARRAY BIOPHARMA INC.

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	By:        
	/s/ Mary P. Henahan

	 
	 
	Name: Patricia Henahan

	 
	 
	Title: Chief Financial Officer

	





	 

	 
	 

	 
	ACCEPTED as of the date
	 

	 
	first-above written:
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	CANTOR FITZGERALD & CO.
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Jeffrey Lumby
	 

	Name: Jeffrey Lumby
	 

	Title: SMD
	 
	 













	
			
	 
	 
	 






SIGNATURE PAGE TO AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO SALES AGREEMENT
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION [4910-13-Pj //!'JM·'

Federal Aviation Administration
[>ATE

SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airwOlihiness directive (AD) for the -NM-/{)6 IALS'~ 

## Ill" t'e ofthe upper fasteners ofthe aft mount support fittings ofthe left and right engines, and 0/1'.;:0:,,;' 

### J' V 

### I]. 

## 10 corrective actions 

### ifnecessary. This new AD requires repetitive replacement ortlle uPI' U'II~GSVMOOL ACTION: Final rule,
products listed above. That AD currently requires adetailed inspection for certam defel: 14 CFR Part 39 

## 1'1"--/(0

• ROlf '~GSYMBOL [Docket No. FAA-20I0-0645; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-200-AD; Amendmen II 

# 1 '40.2 

# ;;1\.-0 NA1-(I, \'J 0::2 ,,- lJ. INITIAu;,'SIG' 9-**; AD 2010- 

### *- *) I

.I ,<" 

### -I u""Cl.. RIN 2120-AA64 

# ;(j Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Corporation Model MD-90~30 Ai'lJlan §UT GSI"MtlOl A!JJ-1-1" AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. IN :

# tee 

# Db

row offasteners ofthe support fittings ofthe engine aft mount with new fasteners; and perform repetitive general visual inspections fordefects ofthe lower row fasteners OATE (Row B) ofthe support fittings ofthe left and right engine aft mounts, and replacement VTINGS\'MDOl all clearance fitfasteners in the lower row ifnecessary. This AD was prompted by repo l'IM.SfSIG oflaose, cracked, 

### ormissing fasteners inthe aft mount support fitting ofthe left and rig Tf engines. We are issuing this AD toprevent loose, cracked, or missing fasteners inthe ROIITINGSYM~OL engine aft mount support fittings, which could lead to separation ofthe support fittings from the pylon, and could result in separation ofthe engine from the airplane. l"ITI~LS"SIG
DATES: This AD is effective [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF ROlIn"" SYM"Ol PUBLICA nON INTHE FEDERAL REGISTER],
#### Ellen K. ROACH, Appellant, v. Mrs. John (Helen) RAUBAR, Appellee.

No. 77-2099.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 15, 1978.

Edward A. Sirkin and David S. Wieder, Miami, for appellant.

John W. Fowler, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON and KEHOE, JJ., and PIERCE, WILLIAM C. (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PEARSON, Judge.

Ellen K. Roach, the plaintiff below, brings this appeal from a final judgment entered upon a directed verdict for the defendant, Helen Raubar. The directed verdict was entered for the defendant at the close of the plaintiff’s case. We reverse upon a holding that the evidence presented showed a prima facie case. See *Brookbank v. Mathieu,*152 So.2d 526 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963).

The plaintiff testified that she was ascending the steps of an apartment house owned and operated by the defendant and that as she reached the top (third) step, she fell. Photographs admitted into evidence showed that the top step was badly broken and damaged with large chunks broken from the lip of the step. Plaintiff did not testify that the broken step caused her to fall. Presumably, for this reason, the trial court entered the directed verdict and the defendant here urges that the directed verdict was proper because to hold that the plaintiff fell because of the defective condition would be to place an inference upon an *85inference, relying upon *Commercial Credit Corporation v. Varn,*108 So.2d 638 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959).

We hold that the principle stated in the Commercial Credit Corporation case is not applicable here because the defective condition of the step was not a presumption but must be regarded as a fact from the photographic evidence and plaintiff’s testimony. Under the circumstances of this case, the jury would be entitled to find that the plaintiff’s fall was occasioned by the defective condition inasmuch as the evidence shows that the fall occurred at the time and place where the defective condition existed. Cf. *Fletcher v. Petman Enterprises, Inc.,*324 So.2d 135 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); and *Majeske v. Palm Beach Kennel Club,*117 So.2d 531 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959).

The final judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.
Lake Umbagog National Wildlife Refuge

=29/Special Hunting Regulations Apply to Shaded Area
° September 2006

For complete Refuge specific regulations,
see Refuge Hunting Regulations pamphlet,
or contact Refuge Headquarters

(603) 482-3415

Yy
“Yh

ie
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 14, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41557 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ORLANDER CRAZE JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-131-3

-------------------- Before KING, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Orlander Craze Johnson appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base. He first asserts that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction because the Government’s case relied primarily on the testimony of a coconspirator, which he contends was unreliable and unsubstantiated. The testimony of various Government witnesses, including the cooperating coconspirator, was sufficient to support the conspiracy conviction because the testimonyNo. 05-41557 -2- established the existence of an agreement between two or more persons to violate narcotics laws, Johnson’s knowledge of such agreement, and his voluntary participation in it. See United
States v. Peters , 283 F.3d 300, 307 (5th Cir. 2002); United States v. Westbrook , 119 F.3d 1176, 1189 (5th Cir. 1997). Johnson avers that the district court should have excluded, under FED . R. EVID . 404(b), the evidence of extraneous drug transactions. The district court’s evidentiary ruling with respect to Johnson’s extraneous drug transactions was in accord with Rule 404(b), which provides that extrinsic evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person to show action in conformity therewith, but is admissible for other purposes, such as intent. See FED . R. EVID . 404(b); United States v. Beechum , 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc). Also, the district court diminished the prejudicial effect of the Rule 404(b) evidence by giving a limiting instruction to the jury regarding the proper use of the evidence. United States v. Taylor , 210 F.3d 311, 318 (5th Cir. 2000). The district court therefore did not abuse its discretion with reference to the challenged evidentiary ruling. United States v. Buchanan , 70 F.3d 818, 831 (5th Cir. 1995). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### William Riley GAYLORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. FF-293.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 14, 1978.

*268Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, Janice G. Scott, Asst. Public Defender and J. Victor Africano, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Michael H. Davidson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Gaylord was sentenced within the statutory maximum prescribed for a violation of Section 812.13(2)(a) (robbery while carrying a firearm). A review of the record in this case reveals no abuse of discretion in the sentencing procedure. Therefore, the judgment and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and MELVIN & BOOTH, JJ., concur.
254 La. 516

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Albert TATE v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 50001.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 21, 1969.

In re: Albert Tate applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Application is denied. This court will not exercise its original jurisdiction until all remedies in the lower court are exhausted.
Order entered November 15, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00010-CV

JOHN P. HAGAN, Appellant

V.

JAMES E. PENNINGTON, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 005-00175-2017

ORDER

On the Court’s own motion, we REMOVE this appeal from submission on December 4, 

2018. The appeal will be resubmitted in the first quarter of 2019.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

PRESIDING JUSTICE