alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Verisity Ltd. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Moshe Gavrielov, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |  |                   |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |                                         |  | 
| |  | ----------------- |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | Date: May 7, 2004 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    Moshe Gavrielov                  |  | 
| |  |                   |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |                                         |  | 
| |  |                   |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Moshe Gavrielov Chief Executive
Officer |  |
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1339 Reported in Senate (RS)]







                                                       Calendar No. 195
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1339

                          [Report No. 109-124]

 To reauthorize the Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design Program 
                              Act of 1994.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 30, 2005

   Mr. Inhofe (for himself, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Chafee, and Mr. Crapo) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Environment and Public Works

                            August 31, 2005

 Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of July 29, 2005, 
                    by Mr. Inhofe, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
 To reauthorize the Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design Program 
                              Act of 1994.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Junior Duck Stamp Reauthorization 
Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    The Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design Program Act of 1994 
(16 U.S.C. 719 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating the first section 6 (16 U.S.C. 719c), 
        relating to authorization of appropriations, as section 7 and 
        moving the section so as to appear at the end of the Act; and
            (2) in section 7 (as redesignated by paragraph (1)) by 
        striking ``2001 through 2005'' and inserting ``2006 through 
        2010''.
                                                       Calendar No. 195

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1339

                          [Report No. 109-124]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To reauthorize the Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design Program 
                              Act of 1994.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            August 31, 2005

                       Reported without amendment`
## St at e of Ne w York Supre me Court , Appe llat e D i vi s i on T h i rd J udi cial D e

part me n t Decided and Entered: November 10, 2016 107805

________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WESLEY L. WOODS JR., Appellant.

________________________________ Calendar Date: September 20, 2016 Before: Garry, J.P., Rose, Devine, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ.

__________ G. Scott Walling, Schenectady, for appellant. J. Anthony Jordon, District Attorney, Fort Edward (Sara E. Fischer of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (McKeighan, J.), rendered July 17, 2015, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted assault in the second degree. In satisfaction of a four-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to the reduced charge of attempted assault in the second degree. He was sentenced, as a second felony offender, in accordance with the terms of the plea agreement to the minimum prison term of 11⁄2 to 3 years, to run consecutively to the sentence that he is currently serving. Defendant appeals. Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and counsel's brief, we agree. Accordingly,-2- 107805

the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]). Garry, J.P., Rose, Devine, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF WORLDCOM, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          66,904
<SECURITIES>                                       746
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,399,380
<ALLOWANCES>                                   200,211
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,682,632
<PP&E>                                       6,786,675
<DEPRECIATION>                                 793,689
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,389,553
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,047,856
<BONDS>                                      6,527,207
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              125
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,092
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,500,648
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,389,553
<SALES>                                      7,351,354
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,351,354
<CGS>                                        3,791,599
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,252,748
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (20,415)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               107,327
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             319,748
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                799,273
<INCOME-TAX>                                   415,621
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            383,652
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   357,219
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22457]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

United States Customs Service
[T.D. 97-73]


Extension of Inspectorate America Corporation's Customs Gauger 
Approval to the New Site Located in Ironton, OH

AGENCY: U.S. Customs Service, Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of the extension of Inspectorate America Corp.'s Customs 
gauger approval to include its Ironton, OH facility.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Inspectorate America Corp., of Houston, TX, a Customs approved 
gauger and accredited laboratory under Section 151.13 of the Customs 
Regulations (19 CFR 151.13), has been given an extension of its Customs 
gauger approval to include the Ironton, OH site. Specifically, this 
site has been given Customs approval under Part 151.13(a)(1) of the 
Customs Regulations to gauge petroleum and petroleum products, organic 
chemicals in bulk and liquid form and animal and vegetable oils in all 
Customs Ports.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Part 151 of the Customs Regulations provides for the acceptance at 
Customs Ports of laboratory analyses and gauging reports for certain 
products from Customs accredited commercial laboratories and approved 
gaugers. Inspectorate America Corp., a Customs commercial approved 
gauger and accredited laboratory, has applied to Customs to extend its 
Customs gauger approval to its Ironton, OH facility. Review of the 
qualifications of the site shows that the extension is warranted and, 
accordingly, has been granted.

Location

    Inspectorate America Corp.'s site is located at 110 N. 3rd Street, 
Masonic Temple Bldg., Room 209, Ironton, OH 45638.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 9, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marcelino Borges, Senior Science 
Officer, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs Service, 
1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20229 at (202) 927-1060.

    Dated: August 12, 1997.
J.E. Harrell,
Acting Director, Laboratories and Scientific Service.
[FR Doc. 97-22457 Filed 8-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
Exhibit 32.2 - SECTION 906 CFO CERTIFICATION


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Absolute Glass Protection, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").
I, Michael I. Kling, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael I. Kling
----------------------------
    Michael I. Kling
    Chief Financial Officer


Date  May 24, 2004
      ------------
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energy & Engine Technology
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Willard G. McAndrew, III, CEO and President of
the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.

/s/ Willard G. McAndrew, III
Willard G. McAndrew, III
Chief Executive Officer

May 17, 2004



































                                     25
Registrant's Specimen Certificate for Common shares.



 Exhibit 4.2 
 VISIONCHINA MEDIA INC. 
 (the “Company”) 
  

			
	 Number
	  	Common Shares
	 -[        ]-
	  	-[        ]-

 Incorporated in the Cayman Islands under the Companies Law 
 (as amended or revised from time to time) 
 The
authorized share capital of the Company is US$11,000 divided into 76,116,739 shares of a nominal or par value of US$0.0001 each (the “Common Shares”) 
 THIS CERTIFIES THAT [            ] of [                    ] is
the registered holder of [            ] Common Shares in the above-named Company subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association thereof. 
 Executed on behalf of the Company this [    ] day of
[                    ] 20[    ]. 
  

					
	  
	  	[Seal]	  	
	 Director/Secretary
	  		  	

 THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS
AMENDED, OR APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS. THE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE OFFERED FOR SALE, SOLD, TRANSFERRED OR ASSIGNED (I) IN THE ABSENCE OF (A) AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FOR THE SHARES UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED,
AND APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS OR (B) AN OPINION OF COUNSEL, IN A GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FORM, THAT REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED UNDER SAID ACT AND APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS OR (II) UNLESS SOLD PURSUANT TO RULE 144 UNDER SAID ACT.

 TRANSFER 
 I
                                        
                     (the Transferor) for the value received DO HEREBY transfer to
                                        
         (the Transferee) the
                                        
                     shares standing in my name in 
 VISIONCHINA MEDIA INC. 
 To hold the same unto the Transferee 
 Dated                      
  

					
	Signed by the Transferor	 		 	
	In the presence of:	 		 	
			
	  
	 		 	  

	Witness	 		 	Transferor
#### George A. REFIOR, Appellant, v. John J. MATUSZCAK and Travelers Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 77-141.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 2, 1978.

*96Joseph R. Moss, Cocoa, for appellant.

James E. Glatt, Jr., and Janis M. Halker, of Gurney, Gurney & Handley, P. A., Orlando, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a final summary judgment holding that the defendant below was entitled to immunity from a tort suit under the Florida Automobile Reparations Reform Act because the plaintiff, as a matter of law, did not sustain a claim of a “permanent injury within reasonable medical probability.”

Under the Florida No-Fault Act in effect at the time of the accident (1972), the plaintiff could only maintain his action if he had sustained medical expenses in excess of $1,000 or sustained a “permanent injury within reasonable medical probability.” Fla.Stat. 627.737. It is acknowledged that the medical did not exceed $1,000.

In support of his motion the defendant submitted the affidavit of Dr. Glen Mussel-man which stated that the plaintiff did not sustain any permanent injury. The plaintiff then submitted his own counter-affidavit stating:

> “That I believe that I have suffered injuries from the accident . . . which continue to cause me pain and which I believe are permanent in nature.”

While plaintiff’s complaint alleges that his injuries “are either permanent or continuing in nature,” it does not allege his injuries are permanent within a reasonable medical probability. In his sworn answers to interrogatories plaintiff stated he knew of no physicians or other medical experts who can testify that his injuries are permanent or who have any opinion whatever concerning any fact in the case. Plaintiff has not seen a doctor on account of injuries incurred in the accident since February 9, 1973. On deposition, plaintiff stated he does not remember asking any of the doctors who treated him whether his injuries were permanent and that no physician has ever told him his injuries are permanent. There is no issue that there is no medical evidence of permanent injury. Thus, assuming plaintiff continues to have pain, but has no medical evidence of permanency, no jury issue exists under the requirements of Fla.Stat. 627.737.

This court is aware that *Gallub v. Del Vecchio,*301 So.2d 785 (Fla.3d DCA 1974) and *Salvador v. Munoz,*193 So.2d 442 (Fla.3d DCA 1966), are authority for the fact that a plaintiff’s medically uncorroborated testimony on the issue of permanency of an injury is sufficient to charge the jury on that issue. However, those cases did not involve the “no-fault act” and this act specifically requires that there be a “permanent injury within reasonable medical probability.” The plaintiff’s affidavit certainly cannot be deemed to speak in terms of “reasonable medical probability.” Therefore, the trial court properly ruled that there was no genuine issue of material fact.

AFFIRMED.

CROSS and ANSTEAD, JJ., and CRAWFORD, GRADY L., (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.
# Senior Procurement Executives meet in Richmond

/ Published Aug. 10, 2017
Richmond, Virginia, 
Defense Logistics Agency Aviation’s Acquisition Executive and Head of Contracting Activity Cathy Contreras hosted the Senior Procurement Executive Aviation Review, Aug. 1 – 2, in Richmond, Virginia. 

The SPE event has been held biannually since June 2015 as a venue where leadership can share information, evaluate and track the health, successes, and upcoming challenges of DLA Aviation’s procurement organization.

DLA’s Acquisition Director Matthew Beebe attended the event and DLA Aviation’s leadership briefed him on strategic outlook items, operational and depot-level repairable executions, acquisition workforce development, certifications and delinquencies, the warrant program which establishes standards for selection and management of contracting officers, contract quality review and unliquidated obligations, which are account payable items ordered or received but not yet paid for. 

Topics also included: portfolio reviews on contracting activities, program oversight strategies, pricing, competition, systems support, the small business program and implementation. The event also served as a venue to provide feedback from the chiefs of the contract offices and contracting officer supervisors to DLA leadership. Beebe emphasized the importance of increasing supplier engagement and communicating expectations with suppliers, understanding industrial capabilities and vulnerabilities, assessing risks and future uncertainties - while always keeping the focus on readiness.
EXHIBIT
10.1





ADDENDUM
TO ORIGINAL LEASE





COME NOW, both the Lessor
(Kurt F. Evans and/or Lela S. Evans, d/b/a Evans Family Investments), and the
Lessee (Lakeland Industries, Inc.), and to the original Lease Agreement dated
August 1, 2001, with the parties agreeing that this Addendum shall be made a
part of the original Lease Agreement as though fully incorporated herein, with
the parties agreeing to the following provisions:





1. The
“Original Lease” shall be extended per its exact same terms with the following
agreed upon Addendum:





a)
Effective August 1, 2007, Lessee shall pay to Lessor the sum of Eight thousand
($8,000) dollars per month beginning August 1, 2007 and for an agreed upon term
of five (5) years;





b) Lessee
shall have the option to renew the original Lease as well as this Addendum
provided that they pay the new amount of Eight thousand eight hundred ($8,800)
dollars beginning August 1, 2012, for an additional five-year term;





c) Lessee
shall be further granted the option to purchase the leased premises located at
2401 Southwest Parkway, St. Joseph, Missouri, for the amount of Eight hundred
thousand ($800,000) dollars, which shall be the net to Lessor with Lessee
agreeing to pay any closing costs, real estate agent fees, title insurance or
any other expenses or costs related to the finalization of any such sale by
Lessor to Lessee.








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties hereto set their hands, having read and fully understanding and
acknowledging the contents of this Addendum and accept this Addendum as a
further extension of the original Lease Agreement, on this 31st day of
January, 2007.








KURT F. EVANS


d/b/a
EVANS FAMILY INVESTMENTS





By:
/s/ Kurt F.
Evans


Kurt F. Evans, Lessor





LAKELAND
INDUSTRIES, INC.





By:
/s/ Christopher J.
Ryan


Christopher J. Ryan, Lessee
Exhibit 32
                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of PCS Edventures!.com, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), we, Anthony A. Maher, Chief Executive Officer and
President, and Christy Vaughn, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.

     Dated: 11/13/03                       /s/ Anthony A. Maher
           ------------------              -----------------------------
                                           Anthony A. Maher, Chief Executive
                                           Officer and President


     Dated: 11/13/03                       /s/ Christy Vaughn
           ------------------              -----------------------------
                                           Christy Vaughn, Chief Financial
                                           Officer
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-94,933-02

EX P A RTE MILAT MUKIMIYAN, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION F OR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 11-430-K

26 B IN THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT F ROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

Per curiam . Y E A R

Y , J., f illed a dissenting opinion in w hich K E E L and S L A U G

H T E R , JJ., joined. O P I N I O N Applicant was convicted of fraudulent use of identify ing information and sentenced to one y ear imprisonment in county jail. He did not appeal his conviction. Applicant filed this a pplication for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cle r k f o r w arded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends that trial counsel rendered ineffective a ssistance because they failed to advise him of the deportation c onsequences of his g uilty plea, as required by Padilla v. Kentucky , 559 U.S. 3 56 (2010). B ased on the record, the trial court has determined that Applicant’s plea was involuntary because trial counsel’s p erformance was deficient and A pplicant was prejudiced. The2

State ag rees that Applicant is entitled to relief under Padilla

. Relief is g ranted. The judg ment in cause number 11-430-K26 in the 26th District Court of W illiamson County is set a side, and Applicant is re manded to the custody o f the Sheriff of W illiamson County

to answer the charg es as set out in the information. The trial court shall issue any necessary

bench warrant within ten day s from the date of this Court’s mandate. C o p i e s o f t

h i s o p i n i o n shall b e sent to the Tex as Department o f Criminal J ustice–Correcti o n a l I nstitutions Division and the B oard of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: September 27, 2023 Do not publish