alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 9026.

#### Crouse, Receiver, *v.*The Third Piqua Building & Loan Company.

(Decided April 3, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Miami county.

*Mr. Charles Baird*and *Mr. F. H.*Water's, for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Lindsey & Lilley; Mr. W. C. Johnston*and *Mr. C. B. Jamison,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur. ■
**-  North Atlantic  
-  Eastern Regional Rsch. Ctr. 
-  Dairy Processing and Products Research 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">		You are here: 						Research / 																				**Research Project:**Structured Educational Program to Lock-in Students to USDA Food Safety Professions
**Location: Dairy Processing and Products Research**
**2008 Annual Report**
**1a.Objectives (from AD-416)**													To collaborate with Delaware State University (DSU) on a USDA l890 Institution Capacity Building Grant, on mentoring and training six Masters degree students in topics related to food processing and food safety.						
**1b.Approach  (from AD-416)**													The faculty of Delaware State University does not have expertise in food safety or the facilities to conduct food safety research.  They propose that their Masters students satisfy their theses requirements by working with ARS Scientists on topics related to the use of food processing and related techniques that ensure food safety, as agreed upon by ARS scientists and DSU professors.  This program will allow DSU to train students in food safety.  This program will allow DSU students to obtain a Masters of Agriculture degree with a specialization in food safety.						
**3.Progress Report**													Four students from Delaware State University have arrived at ERRC and are working in the Dairy Processing and Products RU, the Microbial Food Safety RU, and the Food Safety Interventions Technology RU. One of the students is working at the ERRC Delaware State (Del St.) University Worksite.  One student was assigned to a research project related to cheese safety, two were assigned to projects related to meat safety research, and one student was assigned to egg safety research. The student at the Del St. Worksite was assigned to seafood safety research. The students are conducting literature searches related to their field of study and are currently being trained in the laboratory and pilot plant processing methods used in food processing and food safety research.
This research addresses NP 306 Action Plan Component 1. Quality Characterization, Preservation and Enhancement. Problem Area 1c. Factors and Processes that Affect Quality; Component 2. New Processes, New Uses and Value-Added Foods and Biobased Products. Problem Areas 2c. New and Improved Processes and Feedstocks and NP 108 Food Safety Component 1.2.4 Processing Intervention Strategies.						
    Project TeamTomasula, Peggy Luchansky, John Zhang, Howard  
Project Annual Reports FY 2009 FY 2008 
Related National Programs Quality and Utilization of Agricultural Products(306)  							Last Modified: 03/04/2010 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS108335 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
#### Ex parte Donald C. DeLOACH.

77-313.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 24, 1978.

MADDOX, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
1 

Filed 9/25/14 P. v. Chavez CA3 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED 

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or 

ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for 

purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT 

(Sutter) 

---- 

THE PEOPLE, 

 Plaintiff and Respondent, 

 v. 

MANUEL CHAVEZ, JR., 

 Defendant and Appellant. 

C068666 

(Super. Ct. Nos. CRF102980, 

CRM110632) 

 A jury convicted defendant Manuel Chavez, Jr., of two counts of second degree 

burglary and one count of vandalism and found true an allegation that he had served a 

prior prison term. On July 1, 2011, defendant was sentenced to state prison for four 

years. 

 On appeal, relying on In re Kapperman (1974) 11 Cal.3d 542, defendant contends 

that limiting the application of the “2011 Realignment Legislation” addressing public 

safety (Stats. 2011, ch. 15, § 1), which requires sentencing to local county jails for a class 

of lower-level felons, such as defendant herein, to defendants sentenced on or after 
2 

October 1, 2011, violated principles of equal protection. Therefore, defendant concludes, 

he is entitled to be resentenced under the Realignment Act. We disagree. 

 Following the filing of the briefs in this case, we filed our opinion in People v. 

Lynch (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 353, expressly rejecting defendant’s argument. (Id. at 

pp. 356, 360-361.) For the reasons stated therein, we reject defendant’s contention. 

DISPOSITION 

 The judgment is affirmed. 

 MURRAY , J. 

We concur: 

 NICHOLSON , Acting P. J. 

 HULL , J.
# C_2023208EN.01009001.xml

| 15.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 208/90 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 208/90

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision of 28 March 2023 appointing members and alternate members of the Management Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 116 of 31 March 2023
  )

(2023/C 208/13)

On page 18, Article 1, Table III ‘Representatives of employers’ organisations’, in the entry corresponding to Romania, second cell:

for:

‘Ms Adriana RADA’,

read:

‘Mr Adrian RADA’.

---
Exhibit32.1

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,ASADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VillageEDOCS (the "Company") onForm 10-QSB for the three months ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that::

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Quarterly Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

| Date:  August 14, 2007                                                      | /s/ K. Mason Conner                  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|           ------------------------- | ------------------------------------ |
|                                                                                  | Chief Executive Officer              |

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BYSECTION 906, OR OTHER DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISEADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSIONOF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TOVILLAGEEDOCS AND WILL BE RETAINED BY VILLAGEEDOCS AND FURNISHED TO THESECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
# DLA Aviation Customer Operations Mapping employees' kids – helping kids

/ Published Dec. 22, 2016
Richmond, Virginia, 
Employees of Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Customer Operations Mapping held a holiday luncheon for many of their children Dec. 20 in their office on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. The children enjoyed music, and snacks while they made Christmas cards to attach to gifts purchased by employees. The gifts are being donated to children who are patients at Children’s Hospital of Richmond at Virginia Commonwealth University.  

 The toys and cards will be distributed to patients by the hospital's child life specialist, whose role is to ease emotional stress, provide support and smiles through various activities that assist in bridging the gap between home and the hospital for children with serious medical conditions. 

“This is a great opportunity to help brighten the spirits of children who are sick and cannot be home for the holidays,” said Heather Mays, a mapping program analyst and one of the coordinators for the event.  “It also was a good experience for our children to learn about giving their time to help others.”
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22501]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Availability

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of availability of draft Environmental Impact Statement 
(EIS), notice of public comment period and schedule of public hearings; 
correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the Notice referenced 
in ACTION above, as published in the Federal Register on August 15, 
1997 [62 FR 43768]. The Notice announces numerous times, that public 
hearings will be held Wednesday, September 17, 1997, and Thursday, 
September 18, 1997. At one location the date is incorrectly listed as 
Thursday, October 18, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerome D. Schwartz, Environmental 
Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration, Wind Shear Products Team, 
AND-420, 800 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20591, telephone 
(202) 267-9841.
    Correction of Publication: In the notice document on page 43768 in 
the issue of Friday, August 15, 1997, make the following correction:
    In the DATES section on page 43768, second column, at the last of 
four references to the hearing on Thursday the 18th, the month is 
listed as October. The month should be changed to read September.

    Issued in Washington, DC on August 19, 1997.
Carl P. McCullough,
Product Lead, Wind Shear Products Team, AND-420.
[FR Doc. 97-22501 Filed 8-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 162 (Thursday, August 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44485-44486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22190]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[WY-921-41-5700; WYW135939]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

    Pursuant to the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188 (d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3 (a) and (b)(1), a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas 
lease WYW135939 for lands in Washakie County, Wyoming, was timely filed 
and was accompanied by all the required rentals accruing from the date 
of termination.
    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and 
royalties at rates of $5.00 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year and 
16\2/3\ percent, respectively.
    The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $125 
to reimburse the Department for the cost of this Federal Register 
notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of 
the lease as set out in Section 31 (d) and (e) of the Mineral

[[Page 44486]]

Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land 
Management is proposing to reinstate lease WYW135939 effective April 1, 
1997, subject to the original terms and conditions of the lease and the 
increased rental and royalty rates cited above.
Pamela J. Lewis,
Chief, Leasable Minerals Section.
[FR Doc. 97-22190 Filed 8-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
#### Garrett G. SALSMAN, Appellant, v. Lois E. SALSMAN, Appellee.

No. HH-447.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 26, 1978.

*55Earl R. Duncan, Panama City, for appellant.

James C. Husbands, Panama City, for appellee.

BOYER, Judge.

By final judgment of divorce dated December 18, 1968 appellant and Lois E. Sals-man were divorced. Incorporated in the final judgment, ratified and affirmed was a separation agreement entered into between the parties.

Numbered paragraph four thereof provides in material part as follows:

> “The wife is to have as her sole and exclusive property [the marital home]. The husband agrees to make all the mortgage payments which are now due or may hereafter become due upon said house and lot, which mortgage * * * has monthly payments in the approximate amount of $101. The husband’s responsibility for making these mortgage payments shall continue until the mortgage indebtedness is paid in full. All payments made by the husband on the mortgage indebtedness shall be considered lump-sum alimony, payable in periodic payments.”

The wife died in November of 1974 and her daughter was appointed personal representative of her estate. The husband (appellant) continued to make the monthly payments on the mortgage after the death of his ex-wife until January of 1977 when the property was sold by the personal representative. At that time the balance due on the mortgage in the sum of $6,118.36 was paid by the wife’s estate. When the husband failed to pay the estate the amount that was due on the mortgage at the time it was paid off, the personal representative intervened in the original divorce proceeding and obtained an order requiring the husband to pay to his former wife’s estate the “pay off balance” at the rate of $101.00 per month, which is the order here appealed. That order recited, in material part, as follows:

> “This cause came on to be heard * * * upon the petition filed by the personal representative of the Estate of Lois E. Salsman, Oral Stipulation of facts by the parties, * * * and the Court finding that Garrett Salsman had made mortgage payments pursuant to the Final Judgment of Divorce entered by the Court on December 18, 1968, until January 1, 1977, such payments being in the nature of a property settlement and not subject to termination, and the Court further finding that the property in question was sold by the Estate of Lois E. Salsman in January of 1977, and at the time of the sale the balance owing by Garrett Salsman' was $6,118.36, it is therefore “ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Respondent, Garrett G. Salsman, shall make payments to the Estate of Lois E. Salsman in the amount of * * * $101.00 per month, until the amount of * * * $6,118.36 is fully paid. * *”

We agree with the trial court and with the appellee that this court’s opinion in *Horton*v. *Horton,*330 So.2d 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976) is dispositive. Indeed, the facts of this case are much stronger than those in *Horton.*

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and MELVIN, J., concur.
**32.1           	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

	In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shallbetter Industries, Inc. (the "Company") onForm 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony C. Y. Chow, Chairman andCEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

By:/S/ ANTHONY C.Y. CHOW Anthony C. Y. Chow, Chairman and CEO

	Date: February 18, 2005
#### E. E. RABALAIS & SON, INC., Plaintiff and Appellee, v. UNITED BONDING INSURANCE COMPANY and Charles Bordelon, Defendants and Appellants.

No. 2800.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Third Circuit.

June 12, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 7, 1969.

*24Beard, Blue, Schmitt & Treen, by Harvey C. Koch, New Orleans, for defendants-appellants.

Harold J. Brouillette, Marksville, John A. Boatner, Bunkie, for plaintiff-appellee.

Riddle & Knoll, by Charles A. Riddle, Jr., Marksville, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

On Motion to Dismiss Suspensive Appeal

Plaintiff appellee filed a motion to dismiss defendants’ suspensive appeal on the grounds that it was not perfected within 15 days as required by LSA-C.C.P. Article 2123.

The judgment appealed was signed on March 18, 1969. A certificate of the clerk of court shows that on that same date, March 18, 1969, he mailed notice of the signing of the judgment to all attorneys of record, in compliance with LSA-C.C.P. Article 1913.

On March 25, 1969, defendants filed a motion for a new trial. This motion was not timely filed within 3 days, exclusive of legal holidays, after the clerk mailed the notice of judgment. See LSA-C.C.P. Article 1974. However, the court considered the issues raised and entered an order on April 11, 1969 denying a new trial. Nevertheless, the district judge stated in his written reasons that he did not think the application for a new trial was timely filed.

On April 18, 1969, defendants obtained an order for a suspensive appeal only, not a devolutive, conditioned on defendants furnishing bond in the sum of $45,000. The bond was furnished on April 21, 1969.

Since the application for a new trial was not timely filed, the 15-day delay for perfecting a suspensive appeal commenced at the expiration of the 3-day delay for applying for a new trial and terminated several days before the suspensive appeal was perfected. Therefore, the suspensive appeal was not timely perfected and must be dismissed.

Nevertheless, we will entertain the appeal as devolutive. Our jurisprudence under LSA-C.C.P. Article 2123 is established that where a suspensive appeal is dismissed as not timely perfected, it will be considered by the court as a devolutive appeal. This is true notwithstanding the fact that the motion and order failed to include any mention of a devolutive appeal. Levingston Supply Company, Inc. v. American Employers Insurance Company, La.App., 216 So.2d 158 (1st Cir. 1958); Masonry Products Sales v. Gengenheimer, La.App., 199 So.2d 539 (4th Cir. 1967) ; State ex rel. Cousin v. Louisiana State Board of Health, La.App. 138 So.2d 836 (4th Cir. 1962); Succession of Sagona, La.App., 134 So.2d *25671 (4th Cir. 1961); Kitchen Center, Inc. v. Treigle, La.App., 129 So.2d 95 (4th Cir. 1961) ; Ray v. Marquez, 82 So.2d 786 (Orl. App.1955).

For the reasons assigned, the suspensive appeal is dismissed but the appeal will be entertained as devolutive.

Suspensive appeal dismissed, but appeal entertained as devolutive.

On Application for Rehearing.

En Banc. Rehearing denied.
Exhibit 99.2

                                Certification of
                             Chief Financial Officer
                   of American Physicians Service Group, Inc.


      This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-KSB (the
"Form 10-KSB") for the year ended December 31, 2002 of American Physicians
Service Group, Inc., a Texas corporation (the "Issuer").

      I, W. H. Hayes, the Chief Financial Officer of Issuer, certify that to the
      best of my knowledge:

         (i)  the Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of section
              13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
              U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in
              all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Issuer.

      Dated:  March 31, 2003.



                           /s/ W. H. Hayes
                           ---------------------------
                           W. H. Hayes
                           Senior Vice President- Finance, Secretary and Chief
                              Financial Officer

                           American Physicians Service Group, Inc.




Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 31st day of March 2003


Name:    /s/ Nancy M. Nelson
         --------------------
         Nancy M. Nelson

Title: Notary Public

My commission expires:
August 1, 2003
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries V, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 18, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries V, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SSI Surgical
Services, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                                71
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      7,831
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   9,414
<PP&E>                                            35,023
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (12,228)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    37,410
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              3,946
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                             195
<OTHER-SE>                                        12,205
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      37,410
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  31,935
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     27,161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   6,212
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     120
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 1,838
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (3,396)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (1,324)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (2,072)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (2,072)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.11)



</TABLE>