alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# National Archives to inspect DLA records management this month

/ Published May 15, 2017
The long wait for another inspection of the Defense Logistics Agency’s Records Management Program ends this month, when officials from the National Archives and Records Administration visit two DLA sites.NARA is the regulatory agency for the management of federal records. The inspection, scheduled for mid-May through June, will focus on DLA Headquarters at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, and Battle Creek, Michigan. It’s been 28 years since NARA last visited DLA.“As part of DoD’s multi-year inspection plan, DLA was selected by the DoD records officer, Patti Benner, to be inspected,” said Cecilia Wiker, DLA’s records officer. “She felt DLA would be a great representative of DoD to show NARA that we understand the importance of a quality records-management program.” The inspection will find how well the agency implements its RM program and if it complies with the Federal Records Act and RM regulations (36 CFR Chapter XII, Subchapter B). An inspection focuses on one or more specific elements of the agency's RM program, which may include the following:
        - Agency RM standards; communication, training, policies, procedures and practices across the enterprise.
        - Internal controls to mitigate risk to records and information, and implementation of policies and procedures.
        - Electronic records management for structured and unstructured records.
        - Email management.

RM, no longer paper and manila folders handled by administrative staff, has evolved into records and information management. RIM is the management of physical (hardcopy) and electronic records and information (also called non-records) created by all federal employees and contractors.Government employees and contractors are responsible for the proper handling and safeguarding of records from creation, maintenance, and disposition in accordance with federal regulations and agency policy. Federal records include emails and digitized images; letters and memorandums; completed forms; statistical and narrative reports; maps; architectural, engineering and other drawings; photographs and negatives (digital or physical); motion picture films; graphics; and audio and video recordings.The DLA RIM program office falls under DLA Information Operations and consists of the RIM program manager, agency records officer, supervisors, and component records officers. The RIM staff is available to answer questions and help offices manage their agency records.Employees can visit the DLA Records Management Program page on eWorkplace (this is a Common Access Card-enabled link limited to DLA employees) to find DLA RIM information, policy, procedures and training material. A quick guide for a successful RM inspection includes questions and a checklist to assist in preparing for the NARA inspection.
Company sanitized 

Does not contain Confidential Business 

Information (CBI)

Appendix D

Draft Facility Report on Product Content
2010/15 PFOA Stewardship Program 

Draft Facility Report on Product Content

I. CHEMICAL IDENTIFICATION

Identify the product (e.g fluoropolymer dispersion) for which you are submitting information:

Product name:___Fluorinated Surfactant (monomeric)_______

Product description (including concentrations of perfluoroalkyl chemicals 

identified in Section IV below and year of production): 

All products under the name of “Fluorinated Surfactant (monomeric)” are 

considered to be precursors to PFOA and higher homologues.

II. COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

Identify the company and location of the facility submitting information:

Company name:_AGC SEIMI CHEMICAL CO.,LTD

Site location:3-2-10,Chigasaki,Chigasaki City,Kanagawa,253-8585 Japan

 :2276-2,Nada,Hirai,Kashima City,Ibaraki,314-0012 Japan

Identify a company technical contact who can respond to inquiries about the information 

submitted:

Technical contact:_Shunji Odaka 

Phone: _+81-467-82-4398____

Address: 3-2-10,Chigasaki,Chigasaki City,Kanagawa,253-8585 Japan

III. PRODUCTION

Calendar year for which you are reporting: Jan 1, 2011 to Dec 31, 2011

(Normalized data based on year end run rate.)

Provide the amount of the product for the reporting year at each specific site:

 Imported ___0____kgs/yr

Manufactured _CBI__kgs/yr (As active ingredients)
IV. PRODUCT CONTENT

A. CONCENTRATIONS OF RELEVANT PERFLUOROALKYL CHEMICALS

Please provide the concentrations (ppb) of various perfluoroalkyl chemicals in your product. For 

chemicals for which you do not have actual data, please provide range estimates.

CBI

B. ANALYTICAL METHODS

Analyses should be conducted using the most accurate instrumentation and procedures available 

as of the time of testing. Please provide detailed information on the methods used (including 

analytical standards used, sampling, sample treatment, analysis), assumptions made, uncertainties 

and detection limits (LOD, LOQ) for the data provided.

Active ingredients of the products and solvent/water compose commercial products.
PRIVATE LAW 106–15—NOV. 22, 2000

Private Law 106–15

106th Congress

An Act

For the relief of Marina Khalina and her son, Albert Miftakhov.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of

the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Marina

Khalina and her son, Albert Miftakhov, shall be held and considered

to have been lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent

residence as of the date of the enactment of this Act upon payment

of the required visa fees.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

Upon the granting of permanent residence to Marina Khalina

and her son, Albert Miftakhov, as provided in this Act, the Secretary

of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by the appropriate

number during the current fiscal year the total number of

immigrant visas available to natives of the country of the aliens’

birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act

(8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).

Approved November 22, 2000.

Nov. 22, 2000

[S. 150]
#### Jote GORNITZ, Appellant, v. NATIONAL AIRLINES, INC., a Florida Corporation, and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a Foreign Corporation, Appellees.

No. 77-241.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 18, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 25, 1978.

*202Ira M. Seidler, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Barwick & McClure and David L. Wills, Miami Shores, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in the trial court appeals an adverse final judgment after the granting of a directed verdict at the close of his case.

Appellant was injured by a fellow-passenger on a National Airlines flight when the fellow-passenger threw a garment bag over the back of the seat in which he was sitting and struck the plaintiff.

We affirm. No negligence has been demonstrated on the part of the airline or its employees. The appellant contends that the flight attendant violated certain regulations1 of the airline and, therefore, the airline was responsible. We disagree. First, assuming [which we do not find] that the airline personnel violated the regulations of the airline, this was not the cause of the injury and therefore the plaintiff failed to make a prima facie case. Secondly, even if the flight attendant had violated a regulation, this was not the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury. Therefore, the trial court was correct in directing a verdict. *Smith’s Bakery, Incorporated v. Jernigan,*134 So.2d 519 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961); *Lake Parker Mall, Inc. v. Carson,*327 So.2d 121 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1976).

The final judgment here under review be and the same is hereby affirmed.

1

. Appellant has called to our attention the recent case of *Florida Freight Terminals, Inc.*v. *Cabanas,*354 So.2d 1222 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978) which, in light of our disposition of this appeal, does not require a consideration thereof.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OC TOBER 23, 2019

NO. 03

- 19

- 00355

- CV

G. B. and T. B., Appellant s

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COU N TY

B EFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the order of termination signed by the tr i a l court on May 15, 2019

.

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no

reversible error in the trial court’s order

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s or der

.

B ecau se appellant s are indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50699

Summary Calendar

__________________

KEITH O. YOUNG,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SONYA A. ALEXANDER, ET AL. 

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of

USDC No. A-95-CV-190

- - - - - - - - - -

February 12, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Keith O. Young appeals the dismissal of his suit pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Young contends that the defendants violated

various federal statutes by keeping improper records and by not

releasing records to him. We have reviewed the record and

Young's brief and AFFIRM the district court's dismissal for

essentially the same reasons set forth by the district court. 

Young v. Alexander, No. A-95-CA-190 (W.D. Tex. August 8, 1995).
/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 10, 2014

No. 04-14-00116-CV

Norris J. DEVOLL,

Appellant

v.

Rebecca DEMONBREUN,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-01296

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee's second unopposed motion to extend time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. 

Appellee's brief is due June 10, 2014.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of June, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[110th Congress Public Law 388]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ388.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 4144]]

Public Law 110-388
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To provide for the appointment of the Chief Human Capital Officer of the 
      Department of Homeland Security by the Secretary of Homeland 
             Security. <<NOTE: Oct. 10, 2008 -  [S. 2816]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. APPOINTMENT OF THE CHIEF HUMAN CAPITAL OFFICER BY THE 
                              SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY.

    Section 103(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 
113(d)) is amended--
            (1) by striking paragraph (3); and
            (2) redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs (3) 
        and (4), respectively.

    Approved October 10, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2816:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENATE REPORTS: No. 110-466 (Comm. on Homeland Security and Governmental 
Affairs).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            Sept. 23, considered and passed Senate.
            Sept. 27, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
No. 8945.

#### The Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. *v.*Herzog et al., Exrs.

(Decided March 6, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Lucas county.

*Messrs. Maomell & Ramsey,*for plaintiff in error.

*441*Messrs. Coffey, Mallon, Mills £ Vordenberg*and *Messrs. Cabell £ Freiberg,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ.,' concur.
# CAPT Onofrio P. Margioni

### Executive Officer/Chief of Staff, Joint Reserve Force

### 

### 

CAPT Margioni is a native of Rye, New York. He is a 1999 graduate of New York University earning a Bachelor of Arts degree in International Studies. CAPT Margioni holds a Master’s of Art degree, earned in 2010 in Strategic Studies from the Naval War College, Newport, RI, and is a graduate of the Darden School of Business, University of Virginia, Executive Education Program.

After completing the Navy Supply Corps School Basic Qualification Course in Athens, GA, CAPT Margioni reported to SUPPLY SUPPORT BATTALION TWO as Administrative and Training officer. In 2002, CAPT Margioni reported to Naval Mobile Construction Battalion Twenty-One, Lakehurst, NJ, as the assistant Supply Officer. In 2003, CAPT Margioni was mobilized in support of OPERATION NOBLE EAGLE and ENDURING FREEDOM in support of JTF GTMO operations, as assistant officer in-charge, 22NCR (Forward) Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. CAPT Margioni deployed in 2004 in support of OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM attached to IMEF forces, Al-Anbar province, as officer in-charge of four Logistics cells in the IMEF AO.

In 2005, CAPT Margioni reported to Commander, Naval Forces Southern Command, Mayport, FL, as the N4. In 2007, CAPT Margioni reported on-board USS CARL VINSON (CVN-70) as the S-8 Divisional Officer and assumed duties as Principal Assistant for Logistics. In February of 2009, CAPT Margioni reported to the US Naval War College, Naval Staff and Command School, Newport, RI. In 2010, CAPT Margioni reported to Headquarters Defense Logistics Agency, assigned to J9 as the J97 Training and Readiness Officer, and deployed in 2012 to Afghanistan in support of OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM as the DLA DST Commander for the Capital, North, and East Regions. In 2013, CAPT Margioni reported to Navy Supply Corps School, Newport RI, as the Director for Reserve Programs. CAPT Margioni reported in June of 2015, as the Operations Officer for NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center, Sigonella, Italy. In May of 2016, CAPT Margioni assumed duties as the Executive Officer, NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center, Sigonella, Italy.

CAPT Margioni reported to Coastal Riverine Group TWO, Little Creek VA, as the N41 in January of 2018. CAPT Margioni reported to his current command, DLA HQ J9 Directorate, in September of 2020.

CAPT Margioni’ s personnel awards include the Defense Meritorious Service Medal (two awards), Meritorious Service Medal (two awards), Joint Service Commendation Medal, Navy Commendation Medal (three awards), Army Commendation Medal, Navy Achievement Medal (three awards), Operation Iraqi Freedom and Afghanistan Campaign Medals and GWOT expeditionary Medal with USMC globe and anchor for combat operations.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 165 (Tuesday, August 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22582]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice No. 2591]


Shipping Coordinating Committee International Maritime 
Organization (IMO) Legal Committee; Notice of Meeting

    The U.S. Shipping Coordinating Committee (SHC) will conduct an open 
meeting at 10:00 a.m., on Wednesday, October 1, 1997, in Room 2415 U.S. 
Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 
The purpose of this meeting is to prepare for the 76th session of the 
IMO Legal Committee, which will be held October 13-17, 1997, in London, 
regarding the provision of financial security for seagoing vessels, 
compensation for pollution from ships' bunkers, a draft convention on 
wreck removal, the carriage by sea of radioactive materials, and other 
matters. This meeting will also be a further opportunity for interested 
members of the public to express their views on whether the United 
States should ratify the Hazardous and Noxious Substances Convention, 
adopted in London in May, 1996.
    Members of the public are invited to attend the SHC meeting, up to 
the seating capacity of the room. For further information, or to submit 
views concerning the subjects of discussion, write to either Captain 
Malcolm J. Williams, Jr., or Lieutenant Commander Bruce P. Dalcher, 
U.S. Coast Guard (G-LMI), 2100 Second Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 
20593, or by telephone (202) 267-1527, telefax (202) 267-4496.

    Dated: August 14, 1997.
Russell A. La Mantia,
Chairman, Shipping Coordinating Committee.
[FR Doc. 97-22582 Filed 8-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-M
Exhibit 10.1 – Form of 8% Note


PROMISSORY NOTE


$                                                                                                  Date: _____________, 2015


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned,
Santa Fe Petroleum, Inc., ("Maker"), hereby promises to pay to the order of ___________, or her successors or assigns
("Payee"), the principal sum of $_____________, in legal and lawful money of the United States of America. Interest shall
accrue at the rate of 8% per annum.


1. Payment of Principal and Interest.


Principal and accrued unpaid interest shall be due
and payable on ___________.


2. Cost of Collection.


In the event litigation is commenced to seek collections
of the amounts do hereunder or for any other reason, the party that substantially prevails shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys'
fees and court costs.


3. Cumulative Rights.


No delay on the part of the holder of this Note in
the exercise of any power or right under this Note, shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall a single or partial exercise of
any other power or right. Enforcement by the holder of this Note of any security for the payment hereof shall not constitute an
election by it or remedies so as to preclude the exercise of any other remedy available to it.


4. Notices.


Any notices or demands required or permitted to be
given under this Note by Maker to Payee or by Payee to Maker, as the case may be, shall be given in writing and shall be deemed
received (a) when personally delivered to Payee or Maker at the address set forth below, or (b) if sent by mail, upon deposit in
the United States mail, Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, postage prepaid, to Payee or to Maker at the addresses set forth
below:


Payee:


Maker:   Santa Fe Petroleum, Inc.


1333 W. McDermott Drive, Suite 200


Allen, Texas 75013


5. Successors and Assigns.


This Note shall not be assigned without the express
written consent of all parties hereto. All of the covenants, stipulations, promises, and agreements in this Note contained by or
on behalf of Maker and Payee shall bind their respective successors and assigns.


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


PROMISSORY NOTE - Page 1




    	 



    	 



    

 


6. GOVERNING LAW.


THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED
AND ENFORCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, EXCEPT AS SUCH LAWS ARE PREEMPTED BY APPLICABLE FEDERAL LAWS.
THIS AGREEMENT HAS BEEN EXECUTED AND ACCEPTED IN DALLAS, COUNTY, TEXAS, AND SHALL BE PERFORMED IN DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Maker has executed this Note as of
the date first above written.


 MAKER:


Santa Fe Petroleum, Inc.


By: _______________________


Print Name: Carl Karnes


Its: Chief Executive Officer


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


PROMISSORY NOTE - Page 2
# L_2023184EN.01003701.xml

| 21.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 184/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 184/37

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2023/1515

of 20 July 2023

amending Decision (CFSP) 2021/1026 in support of the Cyber Security and Resilience and Information Assurance Programme of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) in the framework of the implementation of the EU Strategy against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 28(1) and 31(1) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 21 June 2021, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2021/1026 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 21 June 2021, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2021/1026 (1).

| (2) | On 18 May 2023, the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, which is responsible for the technical implementation of the activities referred to in Article 1 of Decision (CFSP) 2021/1026, requested an extension of 12 months, until 30 August 2024, for the implementation of that Decision. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 18 May 2023, the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, which is responsible for the technical implementation of the activities referred to in Article 1 of Decision (CFSP) 2021/1026, requested an extension of 12 months, until 30 August 2024, for the implementation of that Decision.

| (3) | The ongoing implementation of Decision (CFSP) 2021/1026 does not have any additional financial implications for the period until 30 August 2024. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The ongoing implementation of Decision (CFSP) 2021/1026 does not have any additional financial implications for the period until 30 August 2024.

| (4) | Decision (CFSP) 2021/1026 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Decision (CFSP) 2021/1026 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 5 of Decision (CFSP) 2021/1026, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:

‘2.   This Decision shall expire on 30 August 2024.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 20 July 2023.

For the Council

The President

J. BORRELL FONTELLES

---

(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1026 of 21 June 2021 in support of the Cyber Security and Resilience and Information Assurance Programme of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) in the framework of the implementation of the EU Strategy against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (OJ L 224, 24.6.2021, p. 24).

1

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136688 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136688 

 COA: 284372 

Saginaw CC: 76-000565-FY 

REYNALDO RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 14, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). 

s1117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 25, 2008 

 Clerk