alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.2







                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Medco Research, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration  statement (No.
33-35675) on Form S-8 of Medco Research, Inc. and subsidiary of our report dated
January  28,  1997,  with  respect to the  consolidated  balance  sheet of Medco
Research,  Inc.  and  subsidiary  as of  December  31,  1996,  and  the  related
consolidated statements of operations,  stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the two-year  period ended December 31, 1996,  which report
appears in the December 31, 1997 annual  report on Form 10-K of Medco  Research,
Inc.

Our report dated January 28, 1997, contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company is party to certain claims and litigation, which outcome cannot
be presently be determined. No provisions for liability, if any, that may result
from the  resolution of such matters have been  recognized  in the  accompanying
consolidated financial statements.

                                             KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina
March 19, 1998
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 159 (Monday, August 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21849]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., August 21, 1997.
PLACE: Commission Conference Room, 1333 H Street, NW., Suite 300, 
Washington, DC 20268-0001.
STATUS. Closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED. (1) Docket MC97-3--consideration of proposed 
settlement, and (2) Docket MC97-4--consideration of proposed 
settlement.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Stephen L. Sharfman, General 
Counsel, Postal Rate Commission, 1333 H Street, NW., Suite 300, 
Washington, DC 20268-0001, (202) 789-6820.
    Dated: August 13, 1997.
Cyril J. Pittack,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21849 Filed 8-13-97; 4:26 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 165 (Tuesday, August 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22624]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


U.S. Strategic Command Strategic Advisory Group

AGENCY: Department of Defense, USSTRATCOM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 7, 1997, the Department of Defense published a 
notice of closed meetings scheduled for October 23 and 24, 1997 (62 FR 
42521). These meetings have been rescheduled to December 10 and 11, 
1997. All other information remain unchanged.

    Dated: August 20, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSA Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-22624 Filed 8-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
# Janice Samuel

### Director, Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity

### 

### 

On January 7, 2018, Ms. Janice Samuel became the Director of DLA's EEO and Diversity office. In this position, she provides leadership and acts for the DLA Director on oversight, plans, programs, policy formulation, compliance, decisions, and practices pertaining to EEO, and Diversity.

Ms. Samuel has had the opportunity to work in several positions within the federal sector which has embodied her with a vast amount of knowledge and skills in many fields, primarily Human Resource Management, Finance and Accounting. She began her EEO career in DLA Aviation in 2000 as an EEO Administrative Assistant and has remained in EEO to the present.

Ms. Samuel has earned a Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Management from Averett University and certificate in counseling, certified mediator.  She has received numerous awards, including the Superior Civilian Service Award.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-1449

_____________________________

JOHN DANIEL FRANCES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jennie M. Kinsey, Judge.

March 13, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF,OSTERHAUS,and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

John Frances, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Missouri Department ofSocial Services ) ) Under ContractNo. W911S7-09-D-0029 ) APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 58944

Keith L. Baker, Esq.

Baker, Cronogue, Tolle & Werfel, LLP McLean, VA Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney MAJ Travis P. Sommer, JA CPT Harry M. Parent III, JA CPT Tyler L. Davidson, JA

Trial Attorneys ORDER OF DISMISSAL On 15 November 2016, the Board sustained ASBCA No. 59191, and remanded the appeal to the parties for the negotiation ofquantum. MissouriDepartmentof Social Services, ASBCA No. 59191, 16-1BCAir36,563 at 178,091, 178,094. ASBCA No. 59191 had been consolidated with this appeal, ASBCANo. 58944, but we severed the two appeals priorto deciding ASBCA No. 59191. Id. at 178,091. On 9 March 2015, at the beginning ofthehearing ofASBCA Nos. 58944 and 59191, appellant stated, through counsel, that "[a]fter careful consideration," it had decided "notto maintain [ASBCA No.] 58944 as a separate appeal," and was "not going to pursue as a separate matter; [ASBCANo.] 58944" (tr. 1/17-18). Appellant agreed with the Boardthat appellant "just wish[ed] to have the operative facts underlying [ASBCA No. 58944] considered along with the facts in [ASBCANo.] 59191 in terms ofthe total amount ofrecovery that [appellant was] claiming" (tr. 1/18). On 12 December 2016, the Board ordered appellantto show cause why, in view of the foregoing, ASBCA No. 58944 "should not be deemed withdrawn or dismissed (with orwithout prejudice)." On 9 February 2017, appellant responded, sayingthat it "believes that this issue will soon become moot," because it "hasproposed to the [the government] a global settlementthat will resolve all issues raised in Appeal No. 58944, as part ofthe settlement ofthe quantum phase ofAppeal No. 59191." We find that response inadequate to demonstrate that appellant did not, on 9 March 2015, withdraw ASBCA No. 58944. We find that appellant withdrew ASBCA No. 58944 on 9 March 2015.The appeal is withdrawn and dismissed from the Board's docket, withprejudice. Dated: 14 June 2017

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCANo. 58944, Appeal ofMissouri Department ofSocial Services, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

447 

KA 15-00654 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MICHAEL H. CELI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

THEODORE W. STENUF, MINOA, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

GREGORY S. OAKES, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, OSWEGO (AMY L. HALLENBECK OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Oswego County Court (Donald E.

Todd, J.), rendered December 15, 2014. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon a plea of guilty of murder in the second degree (Penal Law 

§ 125.25 [3]). Defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal

forecloses our review of his challenge to County Court’s suppression

ruling (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833), and his challenge to the

severity of the sentence (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737).

Entered: April 28, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
No. 00-6735.

#### Reynoso *v.*McGinnis, Superintendent, Southport Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Troop Support EEO rep named DOD Outstanding WRP recruiter

/ Published Aug. 16, 2017
PHILADELPHIA, 
A Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support employee was recognized for recruiting college students and recent graduates with disabilities into the agency through the Workforce Recruitment Program.

Michael Cowley, an equal employment specialist, received the first WRP Recruiter of the Year Award for recruiting more than 130 interns through the program during the past 13 years. More than 50 of those interns became permanent federal employees.

Cowley found out he earned the award by e-mail from the Department of Defense Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity.

“In the subject line of the e-mail, I was informed that I had been selected as the DOD Component Outstanding WRP Recruiter,” Cowley said. “This is an awesome accomplishment.”

The program matches students’ academic majors with career fields that can lead to permanent positions through the Pathways to Career Excellence or intern program. Cowley believes earning the award demonstrates DLA Troop Support’s commitment to hiring those who have the necessary skill sets to support the warfighters. 

“I hope that the greatest impact is raising awareness that individuals with disabilities can, and do, support our mission,” Cowley said.

Ruben Filomeno, director of DLA Troop Support’s Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity office, said that the award recognizes the great work that Cowley has performed in support of the WRP.

“Mike’s work is enabling DLA Troop Support to continue to build a world-class and diverse workforce capable of performing at a high level,” Filomeno said.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 153 (Friday, August 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20909]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Notice of Comment Period Extension Draft Environmental Impact 
Statement (DEIS) for the Enhanced Training in Idaho Proposal Mountain 
Home Air Force Base, ID

    The Air Force and the Bureau of Land Management are extending the 
public comment period for the Enhanced Training in Idaho DEIS to 
September 8, 1997. The DEIS prepared by the Air Force in accordance 
with the National Environmental Policy Act and the Federal Land Policy 
and Management Act and its associated regulations for public land 
withdrawals, was released for public comment on May 9, 1997. The Bureau 
of Land Management is a cooperating agency for the environmental and 
land renewal processes associated with the proposed action.
    The DEIS analyses three range development alternatives to enhance 
training for the 366th Wing, Mountain Home AFB, Idaho, as well as a No-
Action alternative. Development of one of the range alternatives would 
substantially enhance the realism, quality, and flexibility of local 
training. Each of the three range development alternatives includes a 
ground component and an airspace component. The ground component 
consists of development of a 12,000-acre tactical air-to-ground 
training range, 5 no-drop targets, 30 electronic emitter sites, and an 
associated road network, all of which would be located on federal and 
State of Idaho school endowment lands. For use of the federal lands, 
the Air Force proposes to initiate a Department of Defense military 
withdrawal under the Engle Act for the larger portions and to obtain 
rights-of-way from the Bureau of Land Management for the smaller 
portions. For use of the state school endowment lands, the Air Force 
proposes to enter into lease agreements with the State of Idaho. The 
airspace component of the three alternatives would involve modification 
of special use airspace, including establishment of restricted airspace 
over the tactical training range and reconfiguration and expansion of 
existing Military Operations Areas (MOAs), under approval of the 
Federal Aviation Administration.
    Written comments on this document should be directed to U.S. Air 
Force/Bureau of Land Management, P.O. Box 329, Boise, ID 83702-0329; 
for telephone inquiries, please contact Capt. Melissa Miller, Chief 
366th Wing Public Affairs, Mountain Home Air Force Base, ID, (208) 828-
6800.
Barbara A. Carmichael,
Alternate Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-20909 Filed 8-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3901-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-218]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-204-000]


Young Gas Storage Company, Ltd., Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

December 31, 1996.
    Take notice that on December 23, 1996, Young Gas Storage Company, 
Ltd. (Young), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas 
Tariffs, Original Volume No. 1 the tariff sheets listed on attached 
Appendix A to the filing, to be effective December 31, 1996.
    Young states that the purpose of this compliance filing is to 
conform Young's tariff to the requirements of Order No. 582.
    Young further states that copies of this filing have been served on 
Young's jurisdictional customers and public bodies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.214 or 385.211 
of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests 
must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make the protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-218 Filed 1-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18
U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Jagged Peak, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 24, 2010, (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                       |  |                              
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 5, 2010
|                       | 
|By:                    |  | /s/ Paul B. Demirdjian       
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                       |  | (Principle Executive Officer)
#### James HATLEY, Petitioner, v. TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY, Respondent.

No. 97-0229.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Argued Dec. 2, 1997.

Decided Jan. 16, 1998.

Laurence W. Watts, Aaron J. Bennett, Houston, for Petitioner.

Sarah L. Anderson, Dan Morales, Austin, for Respondent.

BAKER, Justice,

filed a concurring opinion in which

SPECTOR, ABBOTT and HANKINSON, Justices, joined.

James Hatley sued Texas A & M at Galveston for violating his state constitutional rights of free speech and due course of law. His first amended petition prayed only for monetary damages. A & M filed a plea to the jurisdiction asserting sovereign immunity. Hatley filed a second amended petition praying for reinstatement as well as monetary damages. The trial court sustained A & M’s plea to the jurisdiction and dismissed Hatley’s suit. Hatley appealed. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s dismissal order.

*543Hatley’s sole point of error in the court of appeals stated:

> The District Court erred by dismissing plaintiffs claims on the basis that the Constitution of the State of Texas does not provide an independent cause of action *for monetary relief*and because state sovereign immunity shields liability for violations of the state constitution.

(Emphasis added.) Hatley’s brief in the court of appeals argued for a constitutional cause of action for monetary damages and asserted that sovereign immunity does not bar his claim. A fair construction of Hatley’s brief in the court of appeals reveals that Hatley did not argue his present assertion for equitable relief. Although he pleaded a cause of action for equitable relief in the trial court, Hatley did not raise his claim for equitable relief in the court of appeals until his motion for rehearing.

Hatley’s sole point of error before this Court is that sovereign immunity does not bar his claim for equitable relief arising from A & M’s alleged violations of his state constitutional rights. This Court cannot consider a point not assigned as error in the court of appeals and raised for the first time in a motion for rehearing. *See Watson v. Glens Falls Ins. Co.,*505 S.W.2d 793, 797 (Tex.1974). For these reasons, I concur with the Court’s order withdrawing the order granting Hatley’s application for writ of error as improvidently granted and denying Hatley’s application.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Euril B. DAVIS.

No. 60301.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 27, 1977.

*280Leon M. Pliner, Shreveport, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., John A. Richardson, Dist. Atty., Donald C. Brown, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# 8th Theater Sustainment Command’s Command Sergeant Major tours DDSP

/ Published Feb. 14, 2018
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., Command Sgt. Maj. Jacinto Garza, 8th Theater Sustainment Command’s, Command Sergeant Major, has been in his position at Fort Shafter, Hawaii for just a short time -- seven months.  In his first couple of months on duty there, he toured the Pacific Command Area to get an idea of the common operating picture.
Then it was time to branch further out, which brought him to DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania.  

“My commanding general was the former CG here (Maj. Gen. Susan Davidson) and she said I had to make this stop to make sure I get the educational piece. Specifically the DLA distribution pieces -- how it functions, how it operates – in order to start putting the pieces of the puzzle together at the strategic level.”

Command Sgt. Maj. Garza had a full day of tours and briefings here, starting with the Eastern Distribution Center, the largest in the world, where he was impressed with the magnitude of the operation.

“You don’t see this picture, (when thinking of how supplies get to soldiers),” said Garza. 

“But now, when you’re behind the scenes, and you see the warehouses, the structure, the organization ... you see the attention to detail and how everything flows in and out of this distribution center -- it’s amazing.”

During his short stay Garza received numerous presentations and visited additional warehouses – Buildings 80 (Parachute Riggers) and 89 (Foreign Military Sales, Unit Field Management Point, Cold Chain Team), meeting people and learning processes.  

Soldiers, family members and civilians are a top priority for Garza and his command. Summing up his visit here at DDSP, Garza noted his impression of the workforce.

“Civilians are part of the Army force and watching them and the attention to detail they provide, and knowing that their providing that service to the warfighter – it’s absolutely phenomenal.“
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Xavier Lavar French, Appellant

No. 06-20-00114-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 202nd District Court of 

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

18F0164-202). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Carter,* Chief Justice 

Morriss and Justice Stevens participating. 

*Justice Carter, Retired, Sitting by 

Assignment.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the trial court’s judgment and sentence.

We note that the appellant, Xavier Lavar French, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 21, 2021

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### Miriam Dee NOBLES, Petitioner, v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, etc., Respondent.

No. 48100.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 12, 1977.

Rehearing Denied July 12, 1977.

Earl B. Hooten, II, Perry Penland, Jacksonville, for petitioner.

Marion R. Shepard, Mathews, Osborne, Ehrlich, McNatt, Gobelman & Cobb, Jacksonville, for respondent.

Richard W. Slawson, West Palm Beach, Deborah Bovarnick, Miami Beach, Marjorie D. Gadarian, West Palm Beach, for interested parties.

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the Writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the Writ *161must be and is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.

ENGLAND, J., dissents with opinion.

ENGLAND, Justice,

dissents for the reasons expressed in *City of West Palm Beach v. Gordon,*349 So.2d 160, opinion filed today.
No. 9284.

#### The Village of Vermilion *v.*Ackerman et al.

(Decided April 10, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Erie county.

*Mr. John F. McCrystal,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. King £ Guerin; Mr. John Ray*and *Mr. Geo. E: Reiter,*for defendants in error

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Deborah Hayward, Appellant

No. 06-22-00053-CV v.

Socorro Gomez, Appellee

Appeal from the 354th District Court of 

Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 88034). 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Stevens, 

Justice van Cleef and Justice Rambin

participating. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Deborah Hayward, pay all costs incurred by reason of 

this appeal.

RENDERED FEBRUARY 7, 2023

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk