alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Richard PARKER.

No. 60921.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 1977.

In re: Richard Parker applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus.

Granted. The conviction complained of is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court.

SUMMERS, J.,

does not agree that this conviction should be reversed in this ex parte in chambers manner.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40861

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LUIS MOSQUERA-MINA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-98-CR-191-1

- - - - - - - - - -

June 16, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Luis Mosquera-Mina appeals his guilty-plea conviction for

being an alien previously deported and either attempting to enter

or being present in the United States without the consent of the

Attorney General. He argues for the first time on appeal that

the indictment was constitutionally deficient because it stated

that Mosquera-Mina “attempt,” as opposed to attempted, to reenter

the United States. 

Even though the indictment used an incorrect tense of the 
No. 98-40861

-2-

verb attempt, the indictment specified the date of the alleged

offense. The indictment was sufficiently clear, and the

technical error did not render the indictment constitutionally

deficient. See United States v. Newsom, 483 F.2d 439, 440 (5th

Cir. 1974); United States v. Varkonyi, 645 F.2d 453, 456 (5th

Cir. 1981). Furthermore, Mosquera-Mina does not challenge the

indictment’s allegation that he was found in the United States

without the consent of the Attorney General after having been

previously deported, and his conviction may be affirmed based

upon his plea of guilty to that allegation in the indictment. 

See United States v. Harvard, 103 F.3d 412, 420 (5th Cir. 1997).

AFFIRMED.
|   | Name of Subsidiary                                      |   | Jurisdiction of Incorporation    |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                    |   |                             |   |
|   | Culp Fabrics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.                       |   | People’s Republic of China |   |
|   | Culp Fabrics (Shanghai) International Trading Co., Ltd. |   | People’s Republic of China |   |
|   | Culp Cut and Sew Co., Ltd.                              |   | People’s Republic of China |   |
|   | Culp International Holdings Ltd.                        |   | Cayman Islands                   |   |
|   | Rayonese Textile Inc.                                   |   | Canada                           |   |
#### Barrington Anthony GRAY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-483.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 11, 1978.

Barrington Anthony Gray, in pro per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from summary denial of motion for post-conviction relief under Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850 being presented pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) and the court having considered the record presented and the prior appeal by this defendant (330 So.2d 729), which was dismissed with prejudice because the defendant was at large as a fugitive from justice, the denial of the motion is affirmed.

Affirmed.
MIRANDA GOLD CORP.

Unit 1 – 15782 Marine Drive

White Rock, B.C. V4B 1E6



Tel: (604) 536-2711

Fax: (604) 536-2788





Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Miranda
Gold Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Len Goldsmith, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,
that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Dated:	December 19, 2014





“signed” Len Goldsmith

______________________________________________

Len Goldsmith Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
****

**BOARD MEETING ANIMATION****November 8, 2007      **

----

These two animations are available in Flash format    -- presented at the Board Meeting on November 8, 2007, in Washington, D.C.

FIRST PRESENTATION 

*Runway  Incursion Between**United  A320 and**Delta  Airlines B757*

***Fort  Lauderdale-Hollywood Airport**Fort  Lauderdale, Florida**July  11, 2007**OPS07IA006***

**Animation Description/Disclaimer**

*This animated reconstruction shows  the runway incursion incident between an United A320 and a Delta Airlines B757  at the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood Airport on July 11, 2007. The reconstruction  displays information from the flight data recorder,*air traffic communication, *recorded radar data, and aircraft performance data.  This reconstruction does not depict weather or visibility conditions at the  time of the incident.*

The animation shows a three-dimensional image of  the airplanes and their motion. The animation contains audio. 

_________________________________________________________

Air Traffic Communication:

18:36:27            FLL GC:     … tango two on the inner.

18:36:29            EGF9153:            Hold short tango two on the inner Eagle flight ninety-one  fifty-three.

18:36:48            GND:              United fifteen forty four, stop stop  stop stop

 

SECOND PRESENTATION

*Runway  Incursion Between**Republic  Airlines Embraer 170 and**SkyWest  Embraer 120*

***San  Francisco International Airport**San  Francisco, California**May  26, 2007**OPS07IA004***

**Animation Description/Disclaimer**

This animated  reconstruction shows the runway incursion incident between Republic Airlines,  Embraer 170, and Sky West Airlines, Embraer 120 at the San Francisco  International Airport on May 26, 2007. The reconstruction displays information  from the air traffic communication, recorded radar data, and aircraft  performance data. This reconstruction does not depict weather or visibility  conditions at the time of the incident.

The animation shows a three-dimensional image of  the airplanes and their motion. The animation contains audio. 

_________________________________________________________

Air Traffic Communication:

Non pertinent conversation

TWR: Uh --Sky... uh Skywest  5741 hold hold hold.

 

Board Meetings | News & Events

NTSB Home | Contact Us | Search | About the NTSB | Policies and Notices | Related Sites
# Prayer, meditation room gives HQC employees calm atmosphere to practice spirituality

/ Published Feb. 15, 2017
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, A quiet, serene spot for prayer and reflection is just steps away for McNamara Headquarters Complex employees. The former chapel in Room 1331 is now a newly renovated prayer and meditation room open 24/7 for employees of all faiths. A Feb. 16 ribbon-cutting ceremony will formally open the room to employees, but it is already available for use. “We’ve redesigned the space so everything inside helps with prayer and meditation,” said Army Col. Carleton Birch, the Defense Logistics Agency’s command chaplain. “We also took into account different types of faith, so instead of being filled with chairs, there’s an open space on the floor for meditation and Muslim prayer.” A water fountain, scenic wall mural and guest book where employees can record prayer requests are among the updates. Other changes include all new ceiling tiles, recessed lighting, carpet, furniture and prayer rugs. A private room is also available inside for pastoral counseling and reading.Perhaps the biggest highlight of the room is an LED light box that depicts a stained glass window from the Defense Distribution Susquehanna Chapel, which was built in 1941 and is one of the Defense Department’s oldest chapels. Birch said the room further demonstrates DLA’s commitment to resiliency, a goal that’s part of the “People and Culture” objectives in the agency’s strategic plan. The DLA resiliency model includes four pillars: mental, physical, social and spiritual.“DLA recognizes the value of people’s spirituality in their personal resiliency, and the fact that we can provide a place to practice that is a good thing for employees and DLA as a whole. People don’t stop having faith just because they come to work,” Birch said. He hopes the room will become a center where employees can also exhibit their faith by helping others. “We used to collect toiletries for homeless shelters in the area, for example. We’re trying to get that going again, and we’re also partnering with the Fisher House here on Fort Belvoir to see what we can do to help them,” Birch added.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. MICHAEL MILAY,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 10128
D.C. No. 2:16

- cr - 00120

- JAM

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 26, 2017 **
Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN , and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Michael Milay appeals the 12

- month

- and

- one - day sentence , and a condition of supervised release, imposed following his guilty

- plea conviction for failure to register as a sex offender , in violation of 1 8 U.S.C. § 2250(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

OCT 2 2017 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 1 0128

For the first time on appeal, Milay contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to consider his non

- frivolous sentencing arguments, and ad equately explain the sentence. We review for plain error, see United States v. Valenci a - Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), a nd conclude that there is none. The record reflects that the court considered and responded to Milay’s arguments, and sufficiently explained the below

- Guidelines sentence. See United States v. Carty , 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) ( en banc). Moreover, notwithstanding the court’s misstatement regarding the length of the aggregate
term , the record is clear that the court intended to impose a sentence of twelve months and one day for the instant offense a nd run it consecutively to the seven

month sentence for Milay’s violation of supervised release. Milay also challenges a condition of his supervised release that prohibits him from communicating or interacting with known convicted felons, absent permissio n from his probation officer. He contends that the condition is not reasonably related to his rehabilitation because some of his family members are felons and it is beneficial to him to have relationships with those family members. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing this standard condition.
See U.S.S.G. § 5D1.3(c)(8) (2016); United States v. Daniels , 541 F.3d 915, 924 (9th Cir. 2008). The court exempted Milay’s father, the only family member Milay identified as affected by the c ondition, and the condition is reasonably3 17

- 1 0128

related to the relevant sentencing factors, and involves no greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary to achieve the purposes of supervised release.
See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d); Daniels , 541 F.3d at 924. Contrary to Milay’s argument, the court was not required to explain further its reasons for imposing the condition. See Daniels , 541 F.3d at 924.
AFFIRMED.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 1596** 

STEPHEN ALAN ALBERTS, II, Ed.D. , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v.
WHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY , Defendant

– Appellee , and
DR. LETHA ZOOK , Defendant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Wheeling

. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 5:09

- cv - 00109

- FPS

- JES )

Submitted : November 30, 2011 Decided: Jan uary 9, 2012

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Stephen Alan Alberts , II, Appellant Pro Se. Jacob A. Manning, Christopher Paull Riley, DINSMORE & SHOHL, LLP, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Stephen Alan Alberts, II, appeals the district court ’s order granting summary judgment on his retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e

- 17 (2006), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 (2006) . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error or evidence of judicial bias . Accordin gly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alberts v. Wheeling Jesuit University , No. 5:09

- cv - 00109

- FPS

- JES (N.D.W. Va. May 25, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in th e materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of MFIC Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Irwin J. Gruverman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                            | /s/ IRWIN J. GRUVERMAN  |
|----------------------------|-------------------------|
|                       | Irwin J. Gruverman      |
|                       | Chief Executive Officer |
| Date: March 28,  2007 |                    |

 

----
# Norfolk distribution center supports troops at Guantanamo Bay with fresh foods delivery

/ Published Sept. 21, 2017
NORFOLK, Va., 
Adding to DLA Distribution’s ongoing support to Hurricane Irma recovery efforts, last week its Norfolk, Virginia, distribution center shipped various food items to warfighters at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

The DLA Distribution Norfolk East Coast Export Mission Team loaded and shipped over 95,000 lbs. of fresh fruit and vegetables; more than 5,000 dozen eggs; nearly 17,000 lbs. of dairy products; 13,000 lbs. of dry food items; and nearly 2,000 lbs. of frozen foods.  The items were shipped on 463L air pallets and flown on September 15.

According Tim Bailey, DLA Distribution Norfolk, Virginia, regional contracting officer's representative, the team’s mission was assisted by DLA Troop Support field representative Lorenzo Munoz with Army Materiel Command headquarters representative Randy Finney as well as Myron Moore and Jerry Easter of DLA Distribution Norfolk.
#### Richard KANNER, Appellant, v. Melvyn B. FRUMKES, as Chairman, Eleventh Circuit Judicial Nominating Commission, Appellee.

No. 77-798.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 20, 1977.

*197William J. Brown, Miami, for appellant. Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Joseph W. Lawrence II, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, NATHAN and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a complaint for declaratory judgment seeking a determination of whether Section 286.011, Florida Statutes (1975),1 the Government in the Sunshine Law, is applicable to the Judicial Nominating Commission of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit.

The basic issue raised is whether the function of judicial nominating commissions is an executive one which cannot be limited by legislative act. We find this issue was resolved by our Supreme Court in *In Re Advisory Opinion to Governor,*276 So.2d 25, 29-30 (Fla.1973):

> “[2] The appointment of a judge is an executive function and the screening of applicants which results in the nomination of those qualified is also an executive function. It is the prerogative of the Legislature to provide for the number of persons to serve on each judicial nominating commission and the method of their selection. Once the judicial nominating commissions have been established by the Legislature they become a part of the executive branch of government. The function of the commissions being inherently an executive function, such cannot be limited by legislative action.”

Our Supreme Court further held in the case that the power and duty for promulgating rules of procedure for their hearings and findings (independent of any of the three standard recognized divisions of state government), must rest with the members of the commission. *In re Advisory Opinion,*supra, at 30-31.

The function of the judicial nominating commissions being executive in nature and the mandate therefor coming from the Florida Constitution,2 not from the legislature, the governor or the judiciary, it is clear that these commissions are not subject to Section 286.011, Florida Statutes (1975).

Affirmed.

1

. “286.011 Public meetings and records; public inspection; penalties

> “(1) All meetings of any board or commission of any state agency or authority or of any agency or authority of any county, municipal corporation or any political subdivision, except as otherwise provided in the constitution, at which official acts are to be taken are declared to be public meetings open to the public at all times, and no resolution, rule, regulation or formal action shall be considered binding except as taken or made at such meeting.”

2

. Article V, Section 11(d), Florida Constitution (1976).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 162 (Thursday, August 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22209]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-2757-000]


Southwestern Public Service Company; Notice of Filing

August 15, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 22, 1997, Southwestern Public Service 
Company tendered for filing an amended quarterly report for the period 
January 1, 1997 through March 31, 1997.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before August 27, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22209 Filed 8-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit
99.1





Contact
      Information:
              Brian
      Sereda
              Investor
      Relations
              Proxim
      Wireless
              +1
      408 383-7636
              ir@proxim.com





Proxim
Wireless Appeals Non-Compliance Determination Notice from


NASDAQ
Staff





Silicon Valley, August 27, 2008– Proxim Wireless
Corporation (NASDAQ: PRXM), a leading provider of end-to-end broadband
wireless systems that deliver the quadruple play, today announced that it
received a Nasdaq Staff Determination on August 21, 2008 indicating that Proxim
fails to comply with the minimum bid price requirements for continued listing
set forth in Marketplace Rule 4310(c)(4) and that its securities are, therefore,
subject to delisting from The Nasdaq Capital Market.  Proxim has
requested a hearing before a Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel to review the
Staff Determination, which has the effect of staying the determination of the
Nasdaq Staff pending the Panel’s decision.  There can be no assurance
that the Panel will grant Proxim’s request for continued listing, as to what
actions Proxim may take in its efforts to stay listed, as to what actions Proxim
may take if its request for continued listing is denied, or as to timing for any
of these issues.








About Proxim
Wireless


Proxim
Wireless Corporation (NASDAQ: PRXM) is a leading provider of end-to-end
broadband wireless systems that deliver the quadruple play of voice, video, data
and mobility to all organizations today. Our systems enable a variety of
wireless applications including security and surveillance, VoIP, last mile
access, enterprise LAN connectivity and Point-to-Point backhaul. We have shipped
more than 1.8 million wireless devices to more than 235,000 customers worldwide.
Proxim is ISO-9001 certified. Information about Proxim can be found at
www.proxim.com. For investor relations information, e-mail ir@proxim.com or call
+1 408-383-7636.








1561 Buckeye Drive, Milpitas, CA
95035     P
408.383.7600     F
408.383.7680     www.proxim.com
# Joe Yoswa

### Director of DLA Public Affairs

### 

### 

Joe Yoswa has been the Director of DLA Public affairs since March of 2014. He is a leader in government communications with over 25 years' experience serving in U.S. Army, DOD, Joint Service and corporate communication positions focused on current and contingency operations, interdepartmental coordination and international awareness of policy and programs tied to national level events. His most recent positions include: Director of Media Management at Veterans Health Administration; Director, Media Relations and Public Affairs for Contingency Operations at Flour Government Group; Deputy Public Affairs Officer to the Commanding General, Multi-National Force - Iraq and Director of the Media Services Division for the Army's Soldiers Media Center. His education includes a Masters of Science from Texas A&M University in Science and Technology Journalism and a Bachelor's of Science in Secondary Education from the University of Minnesota.