alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 163 (Friday, August 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22316]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP90-119-020]


Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation; Notice of Correction 
Filing

August 18, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 13, 1997, Texas Eastern Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Eastern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, substitute revised tariff sheets 
with a proposed effective date of September 1, 1997 as follows:

Sub Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 46
Sub Fifth Revised Sheet No. 47
Sub Ninth Revised Sheet No. 73

    Texas Eastern asserts that the purpose of the above substitute 
tariff sheets is to correct the Rate Schedule FSS-1 Reservation Charge 
in tariff sheets filed in Docket No. RP90-119-019 on August 1, 1997 to 
remove from rates costs associated with the merger between Panhandle 
Eastern Corporation and Texas Eastern. Texas Eastern states that in the 
tariff sheets filed on August 1, 1997 the Rate Schedule FSS-1 
Reservation Charge was misstated as a result of a transposition error. 
Texas Eastern states that the above substitute tariff sheets reflect 
the correction of the FSS-1 Reservation Charge.
    Texas Eastern states that copies of this filing were served on firm 
customers of Texas Eastern, interested state commissions, current 
interruptible customers and all parties to the S&A.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22316 Filed 8-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
oxidowa Kost
a nt

“bts

nud
#### Ulyess Louis BROWN v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50332.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 15, 1978.

E. R. Arrington, Hazlehurst, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Billy L. Gore, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Copiah County; Joe N. Pigott, Judge.

Before SMITH, P. J., and ROBERTSON and LEE, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
# Workforce sees warfighter support during Troop Support Academy

/ Published Nov. 8, 2017
PHILADELPHIA, 

More than 90 employees at the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support caught a glimpse of the warfighter support they provide during a trip to Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey, Nov. 2.

They saw examples of the materials they provide and met with service members during stops at an aircraft maintenance hangar, a firehouse, a crisis response unit, and a uniform and protective equipment warehouse. 

They also tasted food provided by the Subsistence supply chain while eating lunch at the Halverson Hall dining facility.

The trip was part of Troop Support Academy, a three-day course that provides employees a big-picture perspective of the organization and a better understanding of how they fit into its warfighter support mission.

Senior leaders and representatives from DLA Troop Support’s five supply chains and other staff offices spoke to employees about their respective missions during the other two days of course.
#### SPECIAL DISABILITY TRUST FUND, Petitioner, v. Alexander VAN GIESON, Broward County Transit Authority, Niagara Fire Insurance Company c/o Underwriters Adjusting Company and the Florida Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents. Alexander VAN GIESON, Cross-Petitioner, v. SPECIAL DISABILITY TRUST FUND, Broward County Transit Authority, Niagara Fire Insurance Company c/o Underwriters Adjusting Company and the Florida Industrial Relations Commission, Cross-Respondents.

No. 52621.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 31, 1978.

Rehearing Denied July 24, 1978.

Steven W. Huss and Kenneth H. Hart, Jr., Tallahassee, for Special Disability Trust Fund.

Carl E. Jenkins, Stephen W. Bazinsky of Walton, Lantiff, Schroeder & Carson, Fort Lauderdale, for Broward County Transit and Niagara Fire c/o Underwriters.

Jay M. Levy of Nachwalter, Christie & Falk, Miami, for Alexander Van Gieson.

ADKINS, Justice.

We have for review by certiorari an order of the Industrial Relations Commission affirming an order of the Judge of Industrial Claims which denied the Special Disability Trust Fund’s motion to be made or joined as a party to the claim of the injured employee against the employer/carrier when the employer/carrier’s claim of right to reimbursement was pending with the Fund at the time of the hearing on a proposed lump sum settlement. The Judge of Industrial Claims had noticed the Special Disability Trust Fund of the hearing on the proposed lump sum settlement.

The Industrial Relations Commission departed from the essential requirements of the law. *Special Disability Trust Fund v. Tropicana Products, Inc.,*358 So.2d 1 (Fla.1978). The order is quashed and this case is remanded for further consideration in accordance with the views expressed in *Special Disability Trust Fund v. Tropicana Products, Inc., supra.*Cross-Petition is denied.

OVERTON, C. J., and BOYD, ENGLAND and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4366-4367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2203]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[File No. 1-12546]

Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application to Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration (Pacific Gulf Properties Inc., Common Stock, $.01 Par 
Value)

January 23, 1997.
    Pacific Gulf Properties Inc. (``Company'') has filed an application 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant 
to Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and 
Rule 12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
security (``Security'') from listing and registration on the American 
Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'').
    The reasons alleged in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:
    According to the Company, it has complied with Rule 18 of the Amex 
by filing with such Exchange a certified copy of preambles and 
resolutions adopted by the Company's Board of Directors authorizing the 
withdrawal of its securities from listing on the Amex and by setting 
forth in detail to such Exchange the reasons for such proposed 
withdrawal, and the facts in support thereof. The Security of the 
Company has been listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE'') 
as of October

[[Page 4367]]

29, 1996. In making the decision to withdraw the Security from listing 
on the Amex, the Company considered the direct and indirect costs and 
the division of the market resulting from dual listing on the Amex and 
NYSE.
    Any interested person may, on or before February 13, 1997, submit 
by letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 
450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon 
whether the application has been made in accordance with the rules of 
the exchanges and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the 
Commission for the protection of investors. The Commission, based on 
the information submitted to it, will issue an order granting the 
application after the date mentioned above, unless the Commission 
determines to order a hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2203 Filed 1-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph KAUFMAN.

No. 61372.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 24, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana, applying for writ of certiorari.

Writ denied.

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS, J., would grant.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Willie B. RAYBORN.

No. 61335.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 22, 1978.

John M. Bemiss, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, 18th Judicial District, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Samuel M. Ca-shio, Dist. Atty., Charles H. Dameron, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# H6 Item Name Directory

/ Published Feb. 3, 2022

Access the H6 Information Page **Access the H6 Information Page: https://flisancillaryu.dla.mil/H6/

----

## H6 Item Name Directory Information

The H6 is the Item Name Directory that are in use for NSN assignment. It defines the names and cross references the Item Name Codes (INC) and FSC (Federal Supply Classes). It is used by both internal catalogers and outside customers and each INC provides an Item Identification Guide on how NSNs can answer characteristic data about items categorized under that specific Item Name.

**The H6 Item Name Directory:**
      - Defines item names
      - Cross-references them to Item Name Codes (INC) and Federal Supply Classes (FSC)

You may **search**** the H6 by:
      - Keyword
      - FSC
      - Federal Item Identification Guide (FIIG)
      - INC

The**DD180 Item Name Collaboration Action Request** (PDF Download and open in Acrobat) is available online and, upon completion, can be e-mailed to us at **fiigs@dla.mil**Note:** A .PDF reader is required to view .PDF documents. Use of any .PDF reader of your preference is acceptable;DLA's use of Adobe Acrobat does not constitute endorsement.

The H6 system contains:
      - H6 Home
      - System Access          - H6 Item Name Directory Search 
      - Links/Resources          - DD180 Item Name Collaboration Action Request (PDF)
        - Federal Logistics Information System (FLIS) Technical Procedures 

----

## Related Resource

      -  H2 FSC - Federal Supply Classification Search and Directory**Assistance and Contact InformationDISA Global Service Desk
For **DLA System Access or Technical Issues** please contact the DISA Global Service Desk at: Toll Free: 844-DISA-HLP ** (844-347-2457)DSN: 850-0032     -  Press 5, then speak or enter D-L-ADLA Service Portal**** (CAC or User ID/Password required)Email: **disa.global.servicedesk.mbx.dla-ticket-request@mail.mil (Non-urgent general IT issues)
# ERDC named to Million Dollar Board

/ Published Jan. 27, 2017
Benjamin Franklin’s famous quote, “A penny saved is a penny earned,” is a principle all should live by. The U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center has taken those words to heart, and as a result, the ERDC has recently been named by the Department of Defense’s Defense Logistics Agency for Disposition Services to the Army’s Million Dollar Board.The Million Dollar Board is comprised of the Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force and other federal agencies who reutilize more than $1 million in a single fiscal year and are honored with a signed certificate from Disposition Services.During the last fiscal year, ERDC saved more than $1 million dollars by turning to DLA Disposition Services as a source of supply, reusing excess property and saving taxpayer dollars.To be precise, ERDC’s activity and contribution to that number involved 13 requisitions which resulted in a cost avoidance of $1,859,024. That’s a lot of pennies!In her announcement letter, DLA Director Tina M. Aldrich praised ERDC by saying, “Meeting and exceeding the challenges of today’s Warfighter while remaining fiscally focused certainly deserves recognition. I appreciate and applaud these efforts.”The effort for saving was initiated as a request by ERDC Commander Col. Bryan Green to remove excess property from the Vicksburg site while accounting for the monetary adjustment. District Logistics Manager Audrey Johnson and Regional Property Book Officer Jeraldine Wells led the charge. Under their direction, the ERDC log team was able to achieve this special recognition. Johnson added, “This achievement was accomplished through professional competence, enhanced by adept ability to interact harmoniously with ERDC’s astounding organizational leaders.”According to their website, as part of the DLA, DLA Disposition Services is located at Battle Creek, Michigan, and disposes of excess property received from the military services – wherever the United States has a significant military presence. Inventory changes daily and includes thousands of items including air conditioners, vehicles, clothing, computers and much more. The property is first offered for reutilization within the Department of Defense, transferred to other federal agencies or donated to state and local governments and other qualified organizations. Reutilization means big savings.In the past four years, more than $2.2 billion worth of federal property has been reused each year. Every dollar’s worth of property reutilized is a tax dollar saved.ERDC’s Vicksburg site was one of only 30 recognized organizations reaching the $1 million benchmark for fiscal year 2016 and the only Corps of Engineers Logistics Activity by The Department of Defense Activity Address Code to achieve this goal.*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center website.*
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 141 

To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to allow up to 

24 months of vocational educational training to be counted as a work 

activity under the temporary assistance to needy families program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2005 

Mr. LEVIN (for himself and Mr. JEFFORDS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act 

to allow up to 24 months of vocational educational training to be counted as a work activity under the temporary 

assistance to needy families program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 141 IS

1 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN NUMBER OF MONTHS OF VOCA2 TIONAL EDUCATIONAL TRAINING COUNTED 

3 AS A WORK ACTIVITY UNDER THE TANF PRO4 GRAM. 

5 Section 407(d)(8) of the Social Security Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 607(d)(8)) is amended by striking ‘‘12’’ and insert7 ing ‘‘24’’. 

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


      In connection with the Annual Report of TNR Technical, Inc. (the
"registrant") on Form 10-K/A for the year ending July 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I,
Wayne Thaw, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.



April 13, 2005


                                                   /s/ Wayne Thaw
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Wayne Thaw
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   and Chief Financial Officer
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-0128 State ofMinnesota, Appellant, vs. CreeRae Larson, Respondent. ORDER OFFICE OF APPELLATE COURTS 

### AUG 1 9

### 2015 

# FILED

Respondent filed a motion for attorney fees and costs for the time respondent's counsel spent and the expenses incurred in preparing his brief. See Minn. R. Crim. P. 29.04, subd. 10(3) ("Reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred must be allowed to the defendant on an appeal to the Supreme Court by the prosecutor in a case originally appealed by the prosecutor to the Court ofAppeals ...."). In an order filed onDecember 22, 2014, we deferred ruling on respondent's motion, explaining that we could not assess the reasonableness ofthe attorney fees request on the current record, giventhe unique facts ofthis case. We ordered respondent's counsel to provide us with additional information related to his attorney fees request by January 5, 2015. Respondent has not provided the additional infonnationrequested bythe court. Basedupon all thefiles, records, andproceedings herein,

1IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Respondent Cree Rae Larson's motion for an award of attorney fees and costs is granted inpart and denied in part. The motion is denied withrespectto the request for an award ofattorney fees but is granted with respect to the request for an award of costs. 2. The City ofMinneapolis shall pay respondent's counsel $66.08 in out-ofpocketcosts.
Dated: August 19,2015

2 G. BarryAnderson AssociateJustice
# DLA Distribution Jacksonville: Making a difference!

/ Published April 13, 2017
JACKSONVILLE, Florida, 
With audit readiness at the forefront of all we do and the challenges all warehouses face on a day-to-day basis, DLA Distribution Jacksonville, Florida takes a moment to reflect on the progress and difference a great group of people can make.  

Like other distribution centers, Jacksonville has faced its share of challenges with audit readiness compliance.  Specifically targeting the “One NSN per location” goal, they put together a special projects team to evaluate and implement the transfer of over 11,000 multi-NSN locations to newly created locations within the warehouses.  Only through good planning and steady progress would Jacksonville be prepared to implement the Location Identification Program adopted by DLA to set the stage for a timeline of completion.

Because of previous consolidation efforts and footprint reduction, empty warehouse locations were rare.  Under the direction of the DLA Distribution Jacksonville’s Continuing Government Activity, and through the recommendations of the DLA Distribution Headquarters Storage Optimization Team, the Jacksonville team was able to create approximately 10,000 new bin locations by reconfiguring existing storage aids.  

Under the supervision of warehouse manager, Chase Helm, and business manager, Leslie Strickland, a team of eight people was assembled to accomplish the task. With oversight from the inventory chief Alicia Mott, accountable officer John Pisarski and the Inventory Action team they were able to ensure quality oversight and inventory accuracy.  

Over the next 12 months, the team successfully moved all of Jacksonville’s wholesale mixed rack locations to properly sized bin locations, while ensuring inventory accuracy, proper labeling and good overall storage practices were maintained.  With the task of wholesale under their belts, they were able to turn their focus onto the retail portion of the business.  

When timelines were published for LIP implementation, Jacksonville was ahead of schedule.  At the start of the second quarter of fiscal year 2017, the special projects team had cut the site’s multiple NSNs per location in half with under 4,500 locations left to go.

The re-warehousing effort goes to show that with the right hard working, diverse team, tasks that may seem impossible are attainable.  The Jacksonville team has worked together to excel and prepare for future IPA audits.  

“Credit for this project’s success lies with the people who do the work,” DLA Distribution Jacksonville director Brian Burkholder said. “Team leads Debra Beck, Ernest Thomas and Matthew Ivins have proven to be instrumental assets to the team and to the support of the Warfighter.”
Filed 5/31/23 In re J.M. CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

In re J.M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

J.M.,

Defendant and Appellant. F085431

(Super. Ct. No. JW

- 132483

- 00)



### OPINION

THE COURT *
APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Kern County. John W. Lua, Judge.
Roshni Mehta, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
Appellant.
Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and
Respondent.

- ooOoo

-

* Before Levy, Acting P. J., Poochigian, J. and Meehan, J.2

.

Appointed counsel for minor J.M. asked this court to review the record to
determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. ( People v. Wende (1979)

25 Cal.3d 436.) Minor was advised of his right to file a supplemental brief within

30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. Minor did not respond. Finding no
arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to minor, we affirm.

BACKGROUND
On December 9, 2021, 16

- year

- old minor was involved in a large student dispute

outside his school. When a fe m ale teacher heard minor talking to another student about
fighting each other

, she tried to intervene . She moved between minor and the other

student to protect the student from an attack. She told minor to stop and put her hand up,
touching minor. In respons e, minor pushed her with both hands . She told him again to
stop and he pushed her a second time. More staff then intervened and removed minor

from the incident.
On May 9, 2022, a juvenile petition was filed pursuant to Welfare and Institutions

Code se ction 602 alleging minor committed misdemeanor battery against the teacher
(Pen. Code, § 243, subd. (a); count 1).
At the detention hearing on May 23, 2022, minor was released to his mother on
home supervision.
On October 17, 2022, an amended petitio n was filed with an additional allegation
of misdemeanor public fighting or threatening to fight (Pen. Code, § 415, subd. (1);

count 2).
On October 27, 2022, a contested jurisdiction hearing was held . Th e juvenile

court found count 1 true ; b ut the cour t found count 2 not true.
On November 17, 2022, the disposition hearing was held. The juvenile court
adjudged minor a ward of the court and placed him on probation, including 40 hours in
the juvenile work program.
On December 12, 2022, minor filed a notice of appeal.3

. DISCUSSI ON
Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no evidence of
any arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.

DISPOSITION
The juvenile court’s findings and orders are affirmed.
#### Richard Wayne STEVENS v. REX CHAINBELT, INC.

No. 60684.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 14, 1977.

In re: Richard Wayne Stevens applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Livingston Parish. 349 So.2d 948.

Writ denied.
Exhibit
21.1





SUBSIDIARIES OF SOUTHCREST
FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.








Bank of
Upson


(Organized
under the laws of the State of Georgia)





The First
National Bank of Polk County


(Organized
under the laws of the United States)





Peachtree
Bank


(Organized
under the laws of the State of Alabama)





Bank of
Chickamauga


(Organized
under the laws of the State of Georgia)