alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUMBER 13-08-00453-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE EFRAIN MALDONADO

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

Relator, Efrain Maldonado, pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above

cause on July 28, 2008. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for

writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief

sought. The petition generally fails to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.3

and does not include a sufficient record to establish the right to mandamus relief. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 52.3, 52.7. Further, the petition for writ of mandamus fails to establish that the

district court has abused its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law. Relator has not

shown that the trial court: (1) had a legal duty to perform a nondiscretionary act, (2) was

asked to perform the act, and (3) failed or refused to do so. See In re Chavez, 62 S.W.3d
2

225, 228 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, the petition for writ of

mandamus is hereby DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this 30th day of July, 2008.
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Robert Knoth, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Form 10-QSB of IEH Corporation.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, is made known to me by
         others within the company, particularly during the period in which this
         quarterly report is being prepared; and

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
         this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) Presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);

         a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls.

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 14, 2007

/s/ Robert Knoth
----------------
Robert Knoth
Chief Financial Officer, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer


                                       28
exh10-17_modification.htm


     

    
      

      

    

     

     

     

    EXHIBIT
      10.17

     

    MODIFICATION
      OF PROMISSORY NOTE 

    DATED
      OCTOBER 29, 2007

    
 

    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    


    MODIFICATION
      OF PROMISSORY NOTE

    


    This
      Modification of Promissory Note is
      made as of October 29, 2007, by and between SEAENA, INC., a Nevada corporation
      (“Maker”), and U.C. LASER LTD., a company organized under the
      laws of the State of Israel (“Holder”).

    


    Factual
      Background

    


    Maker
      executed a certain Promissory
      Note dated May 3, 2007, payable to Holder (the “Note”).  Maker and
      Holder desire to amend the Note as set forth herein.

    


    Modification

    


    The
      second (2nd) paragraph
      of the
      Note is amended to read in full as follows:

    


    
      	
               “The
                outstanding principal balance of this Note shall be due and payable
                in
                full on May 3, 2008, or earlier upon sale by Maker of the Seaena
                Class B
                Stock (as defined in the Agreement and Mutual Release dated May 3,
                2007),
                or any other equity interest in Maker exceeding twenty-five percent
                (25%)
                of the voting rights of equity holders in Maker, in one transaction
                or a
                series of transactions.”

            


    

    


    Except
      as expressly set forth herein,
      the Note shall remain in full force and effect.

    


    
      	"Maker"	 	 	"Holder"	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	SEAENA,
              INC.,	 	 	U.C.
              LASER LTD., a company organized under	 
	a
              Nevada corporation	 	 	the
              laws of the State of Israel	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
              By:  
/s/
                Doug
                Lee                       
                

            	 	 	
              By: 
                /s/
                Marshall
                Butler                    
                

            	 
	
                        
                Doug Lee

            	 	 	
                       
                Marshall Butler

            	 
	
                        
                President

            	 	 	
                       
                Chariman of the board
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Calvin MOSLEY.

No. 61336.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 31, 1978.

Thomas J. Ford, Jr., Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Donald T. Giglio, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No. 333-115305, 333-115307 and 333-115308) on Form S-8 of ourreport relating to the financial statements of Embratel Participações S.A. dated March 17, 2004 (except with respect to the matters discussed in Notes 34 and 35, as to which the date is May 21, 2004 and Note 36, as to which the date isJune 21, 2005), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of MCI, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU AUDITORES INDEPENDENTES 

 

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 

August 29, 2005
# The Internet Wants YOU: Consider a Career in Cybersecurity 

/ Published Oct. 22, 2017
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
DLA offers exciting careers and opportunities for growth and development for any level of your career ladder - from entry to full performance level, including students and veterans.

DLA provides the challenges for a satisfying position with a family-friendly culture and excellent benefits.

Visit DLA Careers on the web to explore a future with DLA, or check out USAJOBS.gov to search available positions.
For
      Immediate ReleaseJune
      18, 2008Contact:
            Mary
      Beth Steiginga630
      Godwin AvenueMidland
      Park, NJ 07432201-444-7100








PRESS
RELEASE





STEWARDSHIP
FINANCIAL CORPORATION


DECLARES
INCREASE TO CASH DIVIDEND








Midland
Park, NJ – June 18, 2008 – The Board of Directors of Stewardship Financial
Corporation (NASDAQ: SSFN), parent company of Atlantic Stewardship Bank, has
declared a $0.095 per share cash dividend to shareholders of record date July
15, 2008, payable August 1, 2008.  This represents a 10.8 percent
increase over the third quarter cash dividend paid in 2007, as adjusted for a 5
percent stock dividend paid November 15, 2007.





In
announcing the dividend, Chairman William C. Hanse and President and Chief
Executive Officer Paul Van Ostenbridge stated, “We are pleased to recognize
shareholders with this increased cash dividend, which represents the forty-third
consecutive quarterly dividend paid by the Stewardship Financial
Corporation.  We understand the challenges in the current banking
environment, however remain optimistic about the Corporation’s future
performance.”





Stewardship
Financial Corporation’s subsidiary, Atlantic Stewardship Bank, has banking
offices in Midland Park, Hawthorne (2 offices), Ridgewood, Montville,
Pequannock, Waldwick, Wayne (3 offices), Westwood, Wyckoff and North Haledon,
New Jersey.  Atlantic Stewardship Bank opened in 1985, is a community
bank serving individuals and businesses, and is well known for tithing 10
percent of its pre-tax profits to Christian and local charitable organizations.
Please visit our website at www.asbnow.com or
call 201-444-7100 for information regarding our products and
services.
#### Lewis LAP, Appellant, v. Raymond THIBAULT and Allen Pappas, Appellees.

No. 76-953.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 8, 1977.

Pierce Wood, Melbourne, for appellant.

S. L. Holland, Jr., and William T. McCluan, Crofton, Holland, Starling, Harris & Severs, P. A., Melbourne, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the entire record in this cause and find no reversible error. While the analogy of the fiduciary duty of a trustee to protect the trust res is appealing, the doctrine of separation of powers must restrict the judicial branch of the government, when faced, as here, with the question of issuing a mandatory injunction to require a municipality to file legal action to recover city property, to a determination of whether the municipality’s action involves illegality or a palpable abuse of authority amounting to illegality or is fraudulent or clearly oppressive. *Hathaway v. Monroe,*97 Fla. 28, 119 So. 149 (1929); *McDowell v. Trustees of Internal Improvement Fund,*90 So.2d 715, 718 (Fla.1956).

Affirmed.

DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., and HARRY W. FOGLE, Associate Judge, concur.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CHRISTOPHER SAMUELS, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D21-1174

LT Case No. 2005-CF-068788-A

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed October 4, 2022

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Brevard County, 

Charles G. Crawford, Judge.

A. Michael Bross, of A. Michael

Bross, P.A., Melbourne, for

Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Roberts J.

Bradford, Jr., Assistant Attorney

General, Daytona Beach, for

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
```

[106th Congress Private Law 23]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:pvtl023.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 3123]]

Private Law 106-23
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  For the relief of Malia Miller. <<NOTE: Nov. 22, 2000 -  [S. 2019]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MALIA MILLER.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Malia Miller shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Malia Miller enters the United States 
before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), she shall be 
considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise 
eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an immigrant 
visa or the application for adjustment of status are filed with 
appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act.

[[Page 114 STAT. 3124]]

    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Malia Miller, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by one, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if 
applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made available 
to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 202(e) of 
such Act.

    Approved November 22, 2000.
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report included in the Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-52168, 33-69322, 33-71450,
33-89072, 333-02115, 333-10349, 333-16531, 333-16015, 333-30279, 333-30281,
333-45079, 333-45095, 333-45083, 333-62609, 333-62613 and 333-36901) and Form
S-3 (File Nos. 33-63810, 33-87514, 33-77964, 33-87516, 33-58719, 333-10455,
333-10459, 333-20911, 333-45067, 333-45127, 333-56895 and 333-60859).

                                                     ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Jackson, Mississippi
March 26, 1999
No. 9360.

#### Desnoyers *v.*Ames et al.

(Decided May 1, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Mr. Willis Vickery*and *Mr. G. M. Lemmon,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Herrick & Hopkins,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Two of Troop Support’s ‘best and brightest’ earn NCO of the quarter

By Janeen HayesDLA Troop Support Public Affairs

                PHILADELPHIA  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

NCODLA Troop Support
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1450 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Aspirin. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2005 

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Aspirin.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ASPIRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.05.70 O-Acetylsalicylic acid (Aspirin)(CAS No. 50–78–2) 

(provided for in subheading 

2918.22.10) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2

•S 1450 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44979]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22460]



[[Page 44979]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors, National 
Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute on Deafness 
and Other Communication Disorders on October 24, 1997 which will take 
place in Conference Room D, the Natcher Building, 9000 Rockville Pike, 
Bethesda, MD 20892.
    The meeting will be open to the public from 8:15 to 8:45 am to 
present reports and discuss issues related to the business of the 
Board. Attendance by the public will be limited to space available.
    In accordance with the provisions set forth in Sections 552b(c)(4) 
and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, United States Code and Section 10(d) of Pub. 
L. 92-463, the meeting will be closed to the public from 8:45 am to 
adjournment. The closed portion of the meeting will be for the review, 
evaluation, and discussion of the research programs of tenure-track 
scientists within the Laboratory of Cellular Biology, Division of 
Intramural Research, National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders, including consideration of personal 
qualifications and performance, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    A meeting summary and roster of members may be obtained from James 
F. Battey, M.D., Ph.D., Executive Secretary, Board of Scientific 
Counselors, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication 
Disorders, 5 Research Court, Room 2B-28, Rockville, Maryland 20850, 
301-402-2829. For individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, please contact Dr. Battey at least two weeks prior to 
the meeting.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.173 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communication 
Disorders.)

    Dated: August 18, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-22460 Filed 8-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
No. 9097.

#### Cilley et al. *v.*Yates, Guardian, et al.

(Decided March 13, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*448*Mr. S. T. Crawford,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Bromwell & Bruce*and *Messrs. Harper & Allen,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41297

Summary Calendar

 

JAMES O’DELL WALTON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON; ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-96-CV-640

- - - - - - - - - -

November 24, 1998

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James O’Dell Walton, Texas prisoner # 651346, seeks to

remove his case from the district court to this court. Walton

asserts that the magistrate judge to whom his case has been

assigned is conspiring with the defendants to thwart his civil

rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

This appeal is premature because no final order has yet been

entered with regard to Walton’s claims. See Dillon v. State of

Mississippi Military Dep’t, 23 F.3d 915, 917 (5th Cir. 1994); 28 
No. 97-41297 

-2-

U.S.C. § 1291. As a result, this court lacks jurisdiction even

to consider this appeal. Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,

337 U.S. 541, 545 (1949). This appeal is, moreover, frivolous,

and is hereby DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.