alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### OPINION OF THE CLERK, Supreme Court of Alabama.

No. 1.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 26, 1977.

*1330SENTELL, Clerk.

RULE 7, ALABAMA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION DOCKET FEE ON PETITIONS TO MODIFY A FINAL DECREE

Mrs. Delores N. Pritchett, Circuit Clerk of Etowah County, has submitted to me the following inquiry:

> Would you please advise me in writing as to what authority, if any, I have to collect a Docketing Fee on Petitions to Modify a Final Decree?

My answer to this question is given pursuant to the authority conferred on the Clerk of the Supreme Court by Section 6-105, Act. No. 1205, Acts of Alabama, 1975 Regular Session.

It is my opinion that Rule 7, Alabama Rules of Judicial Administration, considered with Sections 16-109, 16-110 and 16-111, Act No. 1205, supra, authorizes a circuit clerk to collect a docketing fee on petitions to modify a final decree.

The Alabama Rules of Judicial Administration, effective January 16, 1977, were adopted by the Supreme Court of Alabama on October 14,1976, pursuant to the authority granted by Section 6.11 of the Judicial Article (Amendment 328 to the Constitution of Alabama).

Rule 7, supra, is as follows:

> *Fees for Miscellaneous Filings*—

> Any filing for which there is no express cost under the consolidated fee structure shall be treated as an original filing for cost purposes.

In my opinion, the words “Any filing” in Rule 7 have reference to the words “Cases filed” in Section 16-lll(c) of Act No. 1205, and should be read in connection with that section.

The part of Section 16-111, supra, pertinent to this opinion, reads as follows:

> Amount of docket fees to be collected in civil cases.—

> The docket fees which shall be collected in civil cases are:

> * **** * * *

> * * * * * *

> (c) thirty-five dollars for cases filed in the circuit court; * * *

> * * * * ****

In a legal sense, “case” is generally understood as meaning a judicial proceeding for the determination of a controversy between parties where rights are enforced or wrongs are prevented or redressed. *State v. Montevallo Coal Mining Co.,*29 Ala.App. 318, 197 So. 82, 85; *Ex Parte Chesser,*93 Fla. 590, 112 So. 87, 90.

The filing of a motion to alter, amend or vacate a judgment under Rule 59(e), of the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, is not a “filing” under Rule 7, Alabama Rules of Judicial Administration.

In my opinion, a proceeding to modify a final decree, such as a decree of divorce concerning monthly alimony payments, child support and child custody on the basis of a change of circumstances since the final decree, is a case within the meaning of the words “cases filed” in Section 16-111(c), supra; and that a filing of a petition in such a proceeding is a “filing” under Rule 7, Rules of Judicial Administration.
# C_2013156EN.01002502.xml

| 1.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/25

---

Action brought on 12 April 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia

(Case C-188/13)

2013/C 156/41

Language of the case: Slovenian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: B. Rous and J. Hottiaux)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Slovenia

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose Commission Directive 2011/18/EU of 1 March 2011 (1) amending Annexes II, V and VI to Directive 2008/57/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the rail system within the Community, or in any event to communicate them to the Commission, the Republic of Slovenia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose Commission Directive 2011/18/EU of 1 March 2011 (1) amending Annexes II, V and VI to Directive 2008/57/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the rail system within the Community, or in any event to communicate them to the Commission, the Republic of Slovenia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Republic of Slovenia to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Slovenia to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of the directive expired on 31 December 2011.

---

(1)  OJ 2011 L 57, p. 21.

1

---
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of
Ironstone Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof  (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on
the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
his knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.





Date:           April 14,
2010                                                                    /s/  William R.
Hambrecht


Name:  William R.
Hambrecht


Title:  Chief
Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Ironstone Group, Inc. and will be retained
by Ironstone Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and  Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of First Century Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that to such officers knowledge, the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                           
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------
|Dated: March 28, 2008 |  |                           
|                      |  | /s/ J. Ronald Hypes       
|                      |  | J. Ronald Hypes, Treasurer
|                      |  | (Chief Financial Officer) 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### PENSACOLA BEACH REALTY, INC., Grace B. Futch and Thomas E. Archer, Petitioners, v. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. HH-410.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 16, 1978.

Benjamin T. Shuman, Orlando, for petitioners.

Howard Hadley, Winter Garden, and Charles E. Felix, Orlando, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners’ petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the Florida Real Estate Commission’s order of 23 September 1977 is quashed on authority of *Robins v. Florida Real Estate Commission,*162 So.2d 535 (Fla.3d DCA 1964), and this case is remanded for further appropriate action as the Commission deems necessary.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
# Agency honored for charitable campaign promotion

/ Published March 10, 2017

For the Defense Logistics Agency’s work promoting the 2016 Combined Federal Campaign, the agency earned the National Capital Region’s “Best Overall Communications Program” award for medium-sized agencies at the federal-wide level. Medium-sized agencies are those whose goal for contributions is $100,000-$499,000. 

In a March 3 ceremony at the Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture, DLA was honored among agencies who employed a variety of creative techniques to inform and motivate their employees. In addition to using articles, advertisements, posters and “I Care About ...” cards for employees to complete, the team took part in charity fairs, fundraisers and hosted an information table to answer questions about the campaign. They also compiled a video based on a social media phenomenon, the “mannequin challenge,” which featured DLA employees holding signs, banners and other visual representations of DLA’s commitment to CFC.

DLA was represented at the ceremony by Billie Keeler, deputy director of DLA Human Resources; Kathy Rhem, DLA Human Resources communications manager and 2016 CFC campaign manager; and Kaylynn Martin, assistant 2016 CFC campaign manager.

Rhem said the award recognized the entire team's efforts.

“It felt great to be recognized for our work, and it was especially an honor to attend the ceremony at the new National Museum of African American History and Culture,” she said. “We were honored to be recognized for Best Overall Communications Program because this award took into account all the  efforts we undertook to reach our different audiences — senior leaders, CFC volunteers, and most importantly, all the potential donors among DLA employees.”

More than 100 CFC volunteers in DLA Headquarters and DLA Energy helped the agency exceed its $315,000 goal to reach a total of $326,000 in contributions. 

“There's a lot of need in the world, and I'm grateful we were able to help raise these funds for some deserving causes,” Rhem said.
# Denim Day at DSCC

/ Published April 27, 2017
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
DSCC workforce is Going the Distance on Denim Day to raise awareness against Sexual Assault.

DLA is helping to spread the word across the DLA enterprise about the SAPR program and resources, but most important, participation in this month's events such as Denim Day and Teal Tuesdays show support for survivors during Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month.  

Events are geared to provide information, resources and options in a safe environment. Victims have reported that events like these where stories and resources have been shared gave them the information, resources and strength needed to report and know they are not alone.

### Why denim?

### 

### Resources:

**Local Resources:**

DLA Land & Maritime SARC/VA 
      - For information & resources call 614-692-8846
      -     For 24/7 response call 1-800-841-0937    

**Additional Military SAPR Program Contacts:**
      -     Ohio National Guard – 877-751-5628
      -     Navy Recruiting District Ohio – 847-489-8196 
      - Wright Patterson Air Force Base – 937-689-2154 (MTF also available at this site)

**Nearest hospital for a Sexual Assault Forensic Exam (SAFE):**

Mt. Carmel East6001 E Broad StColumbus, OH 43213614-234-6010

**Local Civilian Sexual Assault Crisis Center:**
      -     Sexual Assault Response Network of Central Ohio (SARNCO): 614-267-7020

**Additional SAPR Resources:**
      - DoD Safe Helpline:  available to military members for SAPR reporting & resources
      - MyDuty.mil:  prevention & reporting options
      - RAINN: national sexual assault hotline
      - Vet Center:  military sexual trauma for active duty & combat veterans
      -     Every 107 seconds an American is sexually assaulted. 
      - 1 out of 6 women & 1 out of 33 men are assaulted in their lifetimes. 
      -     We have a responsibility to do our part in not only preventing sexual assault but by educating ourselves on how to support survivors. 
      -     It’s not always easy to know what to say when someone tells you they’ve been sexually assaulted, especially when that person is a family member, friend, or loved one. Consider the following ways of showing support:           - Listen. Communicate without judgment. 
        -         Be there. If the survivor seeks medical attention or plans to report, offer to be there. Your presence can offer the support they need. 
        -         Encourage self-care. Following an assault it is important to practice good self-care during this difficult time. 
        -         Offer support. Encourage the survivor to get support. Share resources like the SAPR team has available today but realize that only the survivor can make the decision to get help. 
        -         Be patient. There is no timetable for recovering from trauma. Avoid putting pressure on them to engage in activities they aren’t ready to do yet.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44981-44982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22544]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Meeting of the Literature Selection 
Technical Review Committee

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given on a meeting of 
the Literature Selection Technical Review Committee, National Library 
of Medicine, on October 23-24, 1997, convening at 9 a.m. on October 23 
and at 8:30 a.m. on October 24 in the Board Room of the National 
Library of Medicine, Building 38,8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, 
Maryland.
    The meeting on October 23 will be open to the public from 9 a.m. to 
approximately 10:30 a.m. for the discussion of administrative reports 
and program developments. Attendance by the public will be limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact Mrs. Lois Ann Colaianni at 301-496-6921 
two weeks before the meeting.
    In accordance with provisions set forth in sec. 552b(c)(9)(B), 
Title 5 U.S.C., Pub. L. 92-463, the meeting will be closed on October 
23 from 10:23 a.m. to approximately 5 p.m. and on October 24 from 8:30 
a.m. to adjournment for the review and discussion of individual 
journals as potential titles to be indexed by the National Library of 
Medicine. The presence of individuals associated with these 
publications could hinder fair and open discussion and evaluation of 
individual journals by the Committee members.
    Mrs. Lois Ann Colaianni, Scientific Review Administrator of the 
Committee, and Associate Director, Library Operations, National Library 
of Medicine, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20894, telephone 
number: 301-496-6921, will provide a summary of the meeting, rosters of 
the committee members, and other information pertaining to the meeting.


[[Page 44982]]


    Dated: August 19, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-22544 Filed 8-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

# Written Statement of
the Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officerof The Middleton Doll
CompanyPursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, the undersigned Vice
President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer of The Middleton Doll Company (the
Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report of
Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 31, 2006

| |                           
| | --------------------------
| | /s/ Craig R. Bald         
| | Craig R. Bald             
| | Vice President Finance and
| | Chief Financial Officer
REVOLVING LOAN ACCOUNT AGREEMENT

      This agreement is made and entered into on the 29th day of December 2000,
between Teleflex Incorporated (Lender) and SSI Surgical Services, Inc., a New
York corporation (Borrower).

                            Establishment of Account

      Under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, the Lender and
Borrower agree to the establishment of a revolving loan account (Account) under
which the Lender, will permit the Borrower to obtain advances from time to time.
The advances and the appropriate charges will be debited to the Borrower's
Account. The Borrower agrees that all advances made under this Agreement will be
made on the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement and in any documents
that evidence the advances made under this Agreement and that are incorporated
by references into this Agreement.

                             Maximum Amount and Term

      The advances to the Borrower may not aggregate more than the maximum
amount of $27,500,000 of principal indebtedness and will be reviewed annually
beginning April 2003. The Lender's willingness to make the advances under this
Agreement up to the maximum amount is subject to the conditions that since the
execution of this Agreement, there has been no substantial or material adverse
change in the Borrower's business, financial condition, general credit standing,
or equity position in security.

                            Method of Making Advances

      Advances shall be made through the Teleflex cash management and
intercompany transaction system. At the end of each Teleflex fiscal month, the
Lender shall provide the Borrower with a statement of intercompany transactions
disclosing the current status of the Account, and the Borrower will provide the
lender with a reconciliation of the statement to its records.

<PAGE>

                             Calculation of Charges

      Interest will be charged monthly on the Account balance of the previous
month at the prevailing Prime rate of interest of PNC Bank plus one and a
quarter (1.25%) percent, divided by 12. Interest charged in this manner will be
charged to the Account.

                                   Prepayment

      The Borrower may pay in whole or in part, the account balance at any time.
Interest will be calculated in accordance with the previous section.


SSI SURGICAL SERVICES, INC.

By: /s/ Paul A. D'Alesio
    ------------------------------

Name: Paul A. D'Alesio
      ----------------------------

Title: CFO
      ----------------------------


TELEFLEX INCORPORATED

By: /s/ Stephen J. Gambone
    ------------------------------

Name: Stephen J. Gambone
     ----------------------------

Title: Controller & CAO
      ----------------------------
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Melvin BUJOL.

No. 60358.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 27, 1977.

Thomas J. Ford, Jr., Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Dist. Atty., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Nick F. Noriea, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1188 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1188

                   For the relief of Fereshteh Sani.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 7, 2005

   Mr. Allen introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Fereshteh Sani.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR FERESHTEH SANI.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Fereshteh Sani shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of that Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Fereshteh Sani enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
Fereshteh Sani shall be considered to have entered and remained 
lawfully and shall be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of enactment 
of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Fereshteh Sani, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of birth of 
Fereshteh Sani under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are 
made available to natives of the country of birth of Fereshteh Sani 
under section 202(e) of that Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 99-8027.

#### Baker *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### Mattie Bell MATHIS, Appellant, v. BANK OF PALMETTO, a Florida banking corporation, Appellee.

No. 68-637.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

May 7, 1969.

Ráy Graham, Sarasota, for appellant.

Clyde C. Goebel, of Grimes, Grimes, Goe-bel, Parry & Blue, Bradenton, for appellee.

*37PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Southwestern Life Insurance Company v. Gerson, Fla.App.1966, 187 So.2d 63.

LILES, C. J., and PIERCE and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
#### Lawrence G. RUSHING v. CITY OF GEORGIANA. Ex parte Lawrence G. Rushing.

Civ. 1318.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

April 19, 1978.

After remand by the Supreme Court of Alabama, Writ of Mandamus GRANTED, pursuant to the judgment and opinion of the Supreme Court, 361 So.2d 11.
No. 00-6921.

#### Roberts *v.*Wiggins et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### JONES & BISHOP, P. A., Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, and Diana L. McCrary, Respondents.

No. 77-2702.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 7, 1978.

Rehearing Denied July 17, 1978.

Michael D. Jones of Jones & Bishop, P. A., Altamonte Springs, for petitioner.

Kenneth H. Hart, Jr., Gen. Counsel, Tallahassee, and Alex D. Littlefield, Jr., Tallahassee, for respondent Florida Department of Commerce Division of Employment Security.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari is hereby DENIED.

DOWNEY, C. J., and DAUKSCH and LETTS, JJ., concur.