alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.14

 

FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE

EXTERRAN HOLDINGS, INC. 2007 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

 

This Fifth Amendment to the Exterran Holdings, Inc. 2007 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (this “Fifth Amendment”), is made and adopted by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Exterran Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), effective as of the Effective Date (as defined below).

 

RECITALS

 

WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Exterran Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended from time to time, the “Plan”);

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Article XIII of the Plan, the Board has the authority to alter or amend the Plan or any part thereof from time to time;

 

WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the Company will spin-off Exterran Corporation, a Delaware corporation, into a new publicly-traded company (the “Spin-Off”);

 

WHEREAS, in connection with the Spin-Off, the Company will change its name to Archrock, Inc.; and

 

WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan in order to reflect the new name of the Company following the Spin-Off, effective as of the date of the consummation of the Spin-Off (the “Effective Date”).

 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is hereby amended as follows, subject to, and effective as of the Effective Date:

 

AMENDMENT

 

1.             Name of Plan.  The name of the Plan shall be amended to “Archrock, Inc. Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.”

 

2.             References.  All references in the Plan to (i) “Exterran Holdings, Inc.” shall be amended to refer to “Archrock, Inc.” and (ii) “Exterran Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan” shall be amended to refer to “Archrock, Inc. Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.”

 

3.             General.  This Fifth Amendment shall be and hereby is incorporated into and forms a part of the Plan, and except as expressly provided herein, all terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

 

*              *              *

 











 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Fifth Amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of Exterran Holdings, Inc. on October 30, 2015.

 

Executed on this 3rd day of November, 2015.

 

 

	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   D. Bradley Childers
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
D.   Bradley Childers
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
President
    


 

Signature Page to Fifth Amendment to the

Exterran Holdings, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan
#### Mary Lee LANGSTON v. STATE.

4 Div. 638.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 20, 1978.

Rehearing Denied July 25, 1978.

Don C. Dickert, Brundidge, for appellant.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen. and Mary Jane LeCroy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

BOWEN, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree. This court, in an opinion written by the Honorable Leigh M. Clark, Supernumerary Circuit Judge, held that the trial court erred when it refused to allow the appellant to explain why she told investigating officers that she had not killed the victim. Accordingly the judgment of conviction was reversed and remanded. *Langston v. State,*Ala.Cr.App., 348 So.2d 273, cert. denied, *Ex parte State ex rel. Attorney General,*Ala., 348 So.2d 277 (1977).

On retrial the appellant was found guilty of murder in the second degree and sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment. On appeal from this conviction the only question raised concerns the propriety of the admission into evidence of the knife which was the murder weapon. The appellant alleges that the weapon was illegally seized and that no consent was given for any search.

This question was decided adverse to the appellant in the opinion reversing her original conviction.

> “By whatever name the manucapture of the towels and the knife may be called, there was nothing unconstitutional or otherwise illegal about it.” 348 So.2d 275.

The record in this case adequately supports this finding.

Therefore, having searched the record for error and having found none, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1181 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1181

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To ensure an open and deliberate process in Congress by providing that 
 any future legislation to establish a new exemption to section 552 of 
  title 5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Freedom of 
   Information Act) be stated explicitly within the text of the bill.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIFIC CITATIONS IN EXEMPTIONS.

    Section 552(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by 
striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following:
            ``(3) specifically exempted from disclosure by statute 
        (other than section 552b of this title), provided that such 
        statute--
                    ``(A) if enacted after July 1, 2005, specifically 
                cites to this section; and
                    ``(B)(i) requires that the matters be withheld from 
                the public in such a manner as to leave no discretion 
                on the issue; or
                    ``(ii) establishes particular criteria for 
                withholding or refers to particular types of matters to 
                be withheld;''.

            Passed the Senate June 24, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1181

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To ensure an open and deliberate process in Congress by providing that 
 any future legislation to establish a new exemption to section 552 of 
  title 5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Freedom of 
   Information Act) be stated explicitly within the text of the bill.
```
From: Armstrong, Ashley 

Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 1:23 PM 

To: Armstrong, Ashley 

Subject: Alternative Efficiency Determination Methods - Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

Good Afternoon,

The US Department of Energy issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) regarding Alternative

Efficiency Determination Methods and Alternative Rating Methods.  A public meeting will be held on

Tuesday, June 5, 2012, which is announced in a separate notice.  The NOPR, as it was issued by the

Secretary, is attached to this email, and additional details regarding the public meeting/webinar should

be posted on DOE's certification, compliance, and enforcement website tonight.

Best Regards,

Ashley
No. 00-6934.

#### Noppenberger *v.*Northrop Grumman Oceanic Division.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-6929.

#### Erdheim *v.*Greiner, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1536 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1536

To provide certain members of the Armed Forces with a deferment of all 
 loan payments under title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, and 
to provide such members with the option to reenroll in institutions of 
          higher education after completion of their service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 28, 2005

Mrs. Murray (for herself, Mr. Kennedy, and Mrs. Clinton) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide certain members of the Armed Forces with a deferment of all 
 loan payments under title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, and 
to provide such members with the option to reenroll in institutions of 
          higher education after completion of their service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Loan Manageability for Armed Forces 
in Higher Eucation Act''.

SEC. 2. STUDENT LOAN DEFERMENT FOR CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    Part G of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1088 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 494. STUDENT LOAN DEFERMENT FOR CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
              FORCES.

    ``Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act--
            ``(1) a member of the Armed Forces serving in a combat 
        operation or combat zone, as designated by the Secretary of 
        Defense, or a member of a reserve component of the Armed Forces 
        who is serving pursuant to a call or order to active duty for a 
        period of more than 30 days, shall be eligible for a deferment 
        of any loan made, insured, or guaranteed under this title, 
        under which periodic installments of principal need not be 
        paid, but interest shall accrue and be paid by the Secretary, 
        during the period of such service and for 6 months after such 
        period; and
            ``(2) each institution of higher education that 
        participates in any program under this title shall provide, to 
        each student who is enrolled in the institution at the 
        commencement of such service, the option to reenroll in the 
        institution after the completion of such service.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

Certification of President



I, Ramon Chimelis, President, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Big Sky Industries II, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: January 14, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 163 (Friday, August 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44692-44693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22270]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2217]

Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in 
Rulemaking Proceedings

August 19, 1997.
    Petitions for reconsideration have been filed in the Commission's 
rulemaking proceeding listed in this

[[Page 44693]]

Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The 
full text of this document is available for viewing and copying in Room 
239, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. or may be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to 
this petition must be filed September 8, 1997. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of 
the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition 
must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has 
expired.

Subject: 800 Data Base Access Tariffs and the 800 Service Management 
System Tariff. (CC Docket No. 93-129).
    Provision of 800 Service (CC Docket No. 86-10).
Number of Petitions Filed: 1.
Subject: Regulatory Treatment of LEC Provision of Interexchange 
Services Originating in the LEC's Local Exchange area. (CC Docket No. 
96-14).
    Policy and Rules Concerning the Interstate, Interexchange Market. 
(CC Docket No. 96-61).
Number of Petitions Filed: 6.

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22270 Filed 8-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
```
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Partnership. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                Freddie M. Kotek                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Freddie                M. Kotek                                        |
| Title: | Chief                Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner |
| Date:  | November                9, 2007                                        |
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Rudolph (Tré) A. Cates III, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Amendment No.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of SiliconMountain Holdings, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’smost recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the smallbusiness issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:January 2, 2008         /s/ Rudolph (Tré) A. Cates III   Rudolph (Tré) A. Cates III   President and Chief Executive Officer
Order entered July 9, 2018

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00167

- CV

SARAH GREGORY AND NE W PRIME, INC., Appellant s

V.

JASWINDER CHOHAN, ET AL AND ALMA J. PERA LE S, ET AL, Appellee s

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 15

- 02925

- E



### O RDER

Although ordered to file the overdue clerk's record no later than June 25, 2018, Dallas

County Clerk John F. Warren has faile d to do so. Accordingly, we again ORDER Mr. Warren

to file the clerk's record. The record shall be filed no later than July 13, 2018

. Extension

requests will be disfavored.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# HQC Active Shooter training teaches ‘Run, Hide, Fight’

By Christine BornDLA Public Affairs

                Fort Belvoir, Virginia  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

active shooterTerrorismDLA Installation Supportemergency preparedness
#### Wilma R. WOODS, Appellant, v. Kenneth DUNWORTH, Travelers Insurance Company and Roy R. Woods, Appellees.

No. 76-2578.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 13, 1977.

William H. Stolberg, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Steven R. Berger of Carey, Dwyer, Cole, Selwood & Bernard, Miami, for appellees— Dunworth and Travelers Ins. Co.

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from dismissing Count II of appellant’s amended complaint is not an appealable order since the action is not one formerly cognizable in equity and Count II is not a cause of action separate from the cause of action stated in Count I.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.