alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ezekial SIMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. FF-348.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 17, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 15, 1977.

Robert Stuart Willis, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and A. S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

SMITH, Judge.

A conviction for murder in the second degree. The trial court did not err in refusing to require the State to introduce in evidence, as a predicate for the in-court identification of Simpson by the State’s principal witness, the photographs exhibited before trial to the witness. Nor did the court err in permitting the witness to testify, on questioning by the State after the in-eourt identification, that the witness had identified the same man in the pretrial photographic display. It was improper for the State to have been permitted to elicit, on redirect examination of the witness, his *126hearsay testimony that the police identified the photograph chosen as Simpson’s. But the police identification of the photograph as Simpson’s, after it was selected, is not shown to have tainted the witness’ selection of it or his in-court identification. The hearsay testimony at trial was error but, in the circumstances, was harmless. The prosecutor in summation to the jury stated:

> . He [defense counsel] told you that the Defendant is never required to take the witness stand and that any comment I or the Court might make about that is absolutely wrong for us to do that, and he’s right in his stating the law to you in that way .

*Jackson v. State,*45 Fla. 38, 34 So. 243 (1903), holds that a prosecutor may not for any purpose call to the jury’s attention that the accused has not testified or insinuate guilt from his failure to do so. Here the jury was first reminded that the accused did not testify by his counsel. It was perilous practice, but not error, for the prosecutor to affirm that the accused’s silence was not to be considered against him. There was no “sinister influence” in these particular remarks. *Gordon*v. *State,*104 So.2d 524, 540 (Fla.1958). There was no other reversible error in the prosecutor’s summation, although we admonish him — Mr. Richard D. Nichols — that his reference to “one of the favorite tricks of a defense lawyer” was a gratuitous insult to the adversary system of justice which he serves. *Cochran v. State,*280 So.2d 42 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973).

AFFIRMED.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, J., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1578 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1578

 To reauthorize the Upper Colorado and San Juan River Basin endangered 
                 fish recovery implementation programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 29, 2005

   Mr. Allard (for himself, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Hatch, and Mr. Salazar) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reauthorize the Upper Colorado and San Juan River Basin endangered 
                 fish recovery implementation programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Upper Colorado and San Juan River 
Basin Endangered Fish Recovery Programs Reauthorization Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. UPPER COLORADO AND SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN ENDANGERED FISH 
              RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS.

    Section 3 of Public Law 106-392 (114 Stat. 1602; 116 Stat. 3113) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``$46,000,000'' 
                and inserting ``$61,000,000'';
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``2008'' and 
                inserting ``2010''; and
                    (C) in paragraph (3), by striking ``2008'' and 
                inserting ``2010'';
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking ``$100,000,000'' and inserting 
                ``$126,000,000'';
                    (B) in paragraph (1)--
                            (i) by striking $82,000,000'' and inserting 
                        ``$108,000,000''; and
                            (ii) by striking ``2008'' and inserting 
                        ``2010''; and
                    (C) in paragraph (2), by striking ``2008'' and 
                inserting ``2010''; and
            (3) in subsection (c)(4)--
                    (A) in the first sentence, by inserting ``and the 
                Elkhead Reservoir enlargement'' after ``Wolford 
                Mountain Reservoir''; and
                    (B) in the second sentence, by striking 
                ``$20,000,000'' and inserting ``$31,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
**UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA** 

**_________________________ )**  **ZAYN HUSAYN, ) )**  **Petitioner, ) )**  **v. ) Civil Action No. 08-1360 (RWR) )**  **ROBERT GATES, ) )**  **Respondent. ) )** 

**ORDER** The matter that is the subject of the government’s classified filing of March 24, 2011, and several subsequent filings, together found at Docket Nos. 272, 277, and 278, is hereby transferred by consent to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. See LCvR 40.6(a). The parties should ensure that all future filings relating to that matter are brought to Judge Sullivan’s attention in accordance with procedures established by him. SIGNED this 18th day of April 2011.

/s/ RICHARD W. ROBERTS United States District Judge

CC: Calendar and Case Management Committee
# L_2023035EN.01000101.xml

| 7.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 35/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 35/1

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/253

of 6 February 2023

implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (1), and in particular Article 14 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 17 March 2014, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 269/2014. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 17 March 2014, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 269/2014.

| (2) | Following the judgment of the General Court in Case T-714/20 (2), one entry should be deleted from the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies, set out in the Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following the judgment of the General Court in Case T-714/20 (2), one entry should be deleted from the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies, set out in the Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014.

| (3) | Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 February 2023.

For the Council

The President

J. ROSWALL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

1

(2)  Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 October 2022, Dmitry Vladimirovich Ovsyannikov v Council of the European Union, T-714/20, ECLI:EU:T:2022:674.

2

Dmitry Vladimirovich Ovsyannikov

Council of the European Union

---

ANNEX

In Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, ‘List of natural and legal persons, entities or bodies referred to in Article 2’, under the heading ‘Persons’, the entry concerning the following person is deleted:

| 161. | Dmitry Vladimirovich OVSYANNIKOV. |
| --- | --- |

161.

Dmitry Vladimirovich OVSYANNIKOV.

---
EXHIBIT 32.0

                           Section 1350 CERTIFICATION

                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Each of, Ronald B. Geib, Chief Executive Officer and Brendan J. McGill, Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of Harleysville Savings Financial
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

(1)   The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal  quarter
      ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.


                                         By:     /s/ Ronald B. Geib
                                                 ------------------
                                                 Ronald B. Geib
                                                 Chief Executive   Officer

                                         By:     /s/ Brendan J. McGill
                                                 ---------------------
                                                 Brendan J. McGill
                                                 Senior Vice President and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

Date:  August 14, 2007

Note:    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
         the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Harleysville Savings
         Financial Corporation and will be retained by Harleysville Savings
         Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
         Commission or its staff upon request.
Corps to assess boots at Parris Island
 
  By Kaitlin Kelly, MCSC Office of Public Affairs and Communication
      Marine Corps Systems Command              Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Marine Corps Systems Command website.
EXHIBIT 32.0

                           Section 1350 CERTIFICATION

                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Each of, Ronald B. Geib, Chief Executive Officer and Brendan J. McGill, Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of Harleysville Savings Financial
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

(1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter
      ended March 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


                                           By:  /s/ Ronald B. Geib
                                                ------------------
                                                Ronald B. Geib
                                                Chief Executive Officer


                                           By:  /s/ Brendan J. McGill
                                                ---------------------
                                                Brendan J. McGill
                                                Senior Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 12, 2008

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Harleysville Savings Financial
      Corporation and will be retained by Harleysville Savings Financial
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries VI, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 25, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries VI, Inc.
# Time is running out to give to CFC

/ Published Dec. 29, 2016
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia, *Editor’s Note: This article is part of an ongoing series describing the important services and support provided by the charities listed in the Combined Federal Campaign’s Catalog of Giving, as experienced by a member of the Defense Logistics Agency Energy workforce. This article highlights two charitable organizations in Arizona. The CFC drive ends December 31.***Please tell me about the women's shelter in Phoenix, Arizona, that you support through the CFC charity. ****How did you get involved with this particular charity? How long have you been supporting this charity?****What does CFC mean to you, especially this time of year and/or what personal connection (if any) do you have with the charity?****As a federal employee, how does donating to this charitable cause make you feel?**MyPayCFC Nexus
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1449 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to the eligibility 

of veterans for mortgage bond financing, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2005 

Mr. SMITH (for himself, Mr. KOHL, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, and Ms. 

MURKOWSKI) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect 

to the eligibility of veterans for mortgage bond financing, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Veterans 

5 Homeownership Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•S 1449 IS

1 SEC. 2. ALL VETERANS ELIGIBLE FOR STATE HOME LOAN 

2 PROGRAMS FUNDED BY QUALIFIED VET3 ERANS’ MORTGAGE BONDS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 143(l)(4) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 (defining qualified veteran) is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘at some 

8 time before January 1, 1977’’, and 

9 (2) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting 

10 the following: 

11 ‘‘(B) who applied for the financing before 

12 the date 25 years after the last date on which 

13 such veteran left active service.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to financing provided and mort16 gage credit certificates issued after June 30, 2005. 

17 SEC. 3. REVISION OF STATE VETERANS LIMIT. 

18 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section 

19 143(l)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating 

20 to volume limitation) is amended to read as follows: 

21 ‘‘(B) STATE VETERANS LIMIT.—A State 

22 veterans limit for any calendar year is the 

23 amount equal to— 

24 ‘‘(i) $215,000,000 for the State of 

25 Texas, 
3 

•S 1449 IS

1 ‘‘(ii) $265,000,000 for the State of 

2 California, 

3 ‘‘(iii) $100,000,000 for the State of 

4 Oregon, 

5 ‘‘(iv) $100,000,000 for the State of 

6 Wisconsin, and 

7 ‘‘(v) $100,000,000 for the State of 

8 Alaska.’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 this section shall apply to bonds issued after December 

11 31, 2005. 

Æ
# American Indian speaker encourages unity and acceptance of all people

/ Published Nov. 20, 2017
PHILADELPHIA, 

A descendant of the Micmac and Mohawk tribes encouraged the Naval Support Activity Philadelphia workforce to look past people’s external differences and to see each other as one people during the National American Indian Heritage Month program Nov. 14.

Kenneth Little Hawk, a Native American storyteller and recording artist, urged the audience to open their hearts so they could hear his message with their spirit.

“Too many have taken being humane out of being human, separating compassion from the heart and people from each other,” Little Hawk said.

Little Hawk shared a story his grandfather told him about a family from Europe that came upon an apple tree and took some apples to eat. The mother and father then sat in the shade and rested their backs against the tree while the children played.

After that family left, families from India, China and Africa would subsequently come upon the tree and take apples to eat. Then while the parents rested under the shade and leaned against the tree, the children played before getting up and leaving.

Little Hawk’s grandfather then asked him if he understood what the apple tree would be saying, to which Little Hawk replied that he didn’t.

“Grandfather said, ‘The tree said, I didn’t say you can’t have any of my apples because I don’t like the color of your skin. The tree didn’t say you can’t have any of my apples because I don’t like the language you speak. The tree didn’t say you can’t have any of my apples because I don’t like the god that you follow,’” Little Hawk quoted his grandfather. 

The lesson learned, according to Little Hawk: The tree would willingly give of itself to people in need, regardless of who they were. And everyone should be like the apple tree, willing to give to those who have less and are in need.

It was a message of acceptance and inclusion of all people, regardless of color or creed, said Katherine Reynolds, a management assistant with the Defense Logistics AgencyTroop Support Command Support Office.

“I was honored to be here, and I was happy I took the time to come,” Reynolds said. “I can identify 100 percent with what he was talking about.”

The American Indian Heritage Month program was sponsored by the DLATroop Support Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity Office Advisory Committee.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 165 (Tuesday, August 26, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 45155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22503]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 97-ASW-03]


Revision of Class E Airspace; Carlisle, AR

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
which revises the Class E airspace at Carlisle, AR. The development of 
a Global Positioning System (GPS) Standard Instrument Approach 
Procedure (SIAP) to Runway (RWY) 09 at Carlisle Municipal Airport and a 
Nondirectional Radio Beacon (NDB) SIAP to RWY 18 at Stuttgart Municipal 
Airport has made this rule necessary. The direct final rule is intended 
to provide adequate Class E airspace for aircraft operating under 
Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) and executing the GPS SIAP at Carlisle 
Municipal Airport and the NDB SIAP at Stuttgart Municipal Airport, and 
both airports are identified within Carlisle, AR, Class E airspace.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The direct final rule published at 62 FR 28339 is 
effective 0901 UTC, September 11, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donald J. Day, Airspace Branch, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region, 
Federal Aviation Administration, Fort Worth, TX 76193-0520, telephone: 
(817) 222-5593.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on May 23, 1997 (62 
FR 28339). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on September 11, 1997. No adverse comments were 
received, and thus this action confirms that the direct final rule will 
be effective on that date.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on August 5, 1997.
Albert L. Viselli,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 97-22503 Filed 8-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
# New consolidated DoD HAZMAT website saves time and money

/ Published July 6, 2017

Military and NASA customers looking for hazardous material information now have access to a new consolidated defense resource for environmental, occupational, safety and health missions.

The Defense Logistics Agency’s Hazardous Material Management System merged with the Department of Defense’s Hazardous Material Information Resource System June 30, creating HMIRS Next Gen. Merging the two programs into one platform drives down infrastructure costs and integrates a process management solution. 

“This is a big win for all involved parties,” said Warren Scott, HMIRS Next Gen program manager. “We will be deploying one application supporting the two separate but related environmental, occupational, safety and health missions, increasing data integrity, eliminating dual entry, enhancing regulatory reporting and reducing life cycle costs.”

HMIRS and HMMS complement each other with a variety of different capabilities. Independent from other systems, the purpose of HMMS is to track and manage hazardous materials, including waste. The system provides both visibility and accountability that satisfies federal, state and local reporting and compliance requirements for government facilities. 

HMIRS contains information on more than 544,000 hazardous products. For example, government worksites such as warehouses, shipping locations and emergency response locations use the Online Web Application to access electronic hazardous material documents. 

HMIRS Next Gen has been modernized with industry best practices in mind, such as enhanced navigation capabilities, filtering processes to quickly locate desired information, and a streamlined data entry process. It will also reduce data entry times for 20,000 or more documents added each year. 

Current customers with an Account Management and Provisioning System profile will be migrated to the new platform (these customers will still need to register for their role in AMPS). New customers or those current users without an AMPS profile will need to request an AMPS account and register for their role for access.