alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 163 (Friday, August 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22325]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Appointments to Recertification Performance Review Boards for the 
Senior Executive Service

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Appointment to recertification performance review boards for 
the senior executive service.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has announced the 
following appointments to NRC Recertification Performance Review 
Boards.
    The following individuals are appointed as members of the NRC 
Recertification Performance Review Board (PRB) responsible for making 
recommendations to the appointing and awarding authorities on 
recertification for Senior Executives:

New Appointees

Patricia G. Norry, Deputy Executive Director for Management Services, 
Chair
Karen D. Cyr, General Counsel
Luis A. Reyes, Regional Administrator, Region II

    The following individuals are appointed as members of the NRC 
Recertification PRB Panel responsible for making recommendations to the 
appointing and awarding authorities on recertification of 
Recertification PRB members:

New Appointees

Jesse L. Funches, Chief Financial Officer, Chair
Martin J. Virgilio, Executive Assistant and Director, Office of the 
Chairman
Hugh L. Thompson, Jr., Deputy Executive Director for Regulatory 
Programs.

    All appointments are made pursuant to Section 4314 of Chapter 43 of 
Title 5 of the United States Code.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 22, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carolyn J. Swanson, Secretary, 
Executive Resources Board, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
Washington, D.C. 20555 (301) 415-7103.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6th day of August 1997.

    For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Carolyn J. Swanson,
Secretary, Executive Resources Board.
[FR Doc. 97-22325 Filed 8-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>     1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         612
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 2880
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                     36
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                        2028
<DEPRECIATION>                                1221
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                8186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         5824
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       385
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                     50
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  8186
<SALES>                                      10708
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             10708
<CGS>                                         5647
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                10184
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                524
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            524
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                   524
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .02


</TABLE>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-17-00258-CV

CITY OF FORT WORTH,

Appellant

v.

JEFF HART, AS NEXT FRIEND

OF K.H., A MINOR, FARMERS

TEXAS COUNTY MUTUAL

INSURANCE COMPANY, AND

RACHEL E. HOWARD,

Appellees

From the 18th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-C201600644

ORDER

Appellees’ motion for rehearing is denied. The Court’s Memorandum Opinion 

and judgment, dated October 10, 2018, are withdrawn, and the Memorandum Opinion 

and judgment dated January 2, 2019, are substituted therefore in order to include all 

parties in the case heading and judgment.
City of Fort Worth v. Hart Page 2

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and 

Justice Scoggins

Order issued and filed January 2, 2019
EXHIBIT (23)

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
1700 Market Street
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-3984
Telephone (215) 246-2300
Facsimile (215) 569-2441

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-15167 and No. 33-82172 of State Bancorp, Inc. on Forms S-8 of our report
dated January 28, 2000, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of State
Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1999.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

March 24, 2000
No. 5998.

#### NEW ORLEANS BREWING COMPANY vs. ABRAHAM OLDSTEIN.

Syllabus.

"Where, in the opinion of the appellate Court, the interests'of justice will best be subserved by setting aside the judgment and remanding the case, that course will be pursued.

Appeal from the Civil District Court, Parish uf" Orleans,' Division “B,” No. 103,584. -Hon. F. D. King, Judge.

Mc'C'loskey, Benedict and John McCloskey, for plaintiff and appellee.

E. M. Heath, for defendant and appellant.

*144H. A. Moise, attorney.

His Honor, EMILE GODCHAUX,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

Tire record shows that defendant was .absent and unrepresented at the time of the trial and judgment below. Upon this appeal from the judgment. against him, he urges that the judgment be set aside and that the case be remanded in order to be afforded the opportunity of establishing the apparently valid defense set out in detail in his answer.

Defendant’s application sets out that on the day and ■a short time before the hour fixed for the trial of the case, namely, ¡11 A. M., the attorney, who had filed answer on his behalf, withdrew from the case; that he succeeded in employing new counsel at about 10.15 A. M., but that owing to the time required to acquaint the latter with the-facts and defenses and to secure the presence of his witnesses, he was unable to reach Court until 11:30 A. M., that upon .arrival there with his counsel and witnesses, willing and prepared to go to- trial, he found that the cause, which was seventh on the docket of the Court, had already been tried and submitted and had proceeded to judgment, and that several cases which had occupied a preferential right of trial on the docket, had been temporarily passed by the Court, and were in fact taken up and tried subsequent to his arrival.

The defendant applied in vain to the trial Court -to reopen the case, reciting the foregoing circumstances, stating in detail the facts intended to be proved, naming as his principal witness an employee of plaintiff, and exhibiting to the Court documentary evidence, emanating from plaintiff and on its face supporting the averments of the answer.

*145Opinion and decree, February 9th, 1914.

It does not appear that defendant has been guilty of any laches, and upon the whole there is good ground for 'believing, if the facts stated by him be true, that he has a substantial defense which by force of circumstances beyond his control he has been unable to present. The interests of justice would best be subserved by .reversing the judgment and remanding the cause.

It is accordingly ordered that the -judgment be reversed ' and the case remanded for further proceeding in accordance with law and with the views herein expressed, all costs, including those of the present appeal to await the final determination of the case.

Reversed and remanded.
**Docket Number: FAA -**  **2011 -**  **0718**
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1482

AN ACT

To amend the Act of August 9, 1955, to provide for binding

arbitration for Gila River Indian Community Reservation

Contracts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 1482 ES

1 SECTION 1. BINDING ARBITRATION FOR GILA RIVER IN2 DIAN COMMUNITY RESERVATION CON3 TRACTS.

4 (a) AMENDMENTS.—Subsection (f) of the first sec5 tion of the Act of August 9, 1955 (25 U.S.C. 415(f)), is

6 amended—

7 (1) in the first sentence—

8 (A) by striking ‘‘Any lease’’ and all that

9 follows through ‘‘affecting land’’ and inserting

10 ‘‘Any contract, including a lease, affecting

11 land’’; and

12 (B) by striking ‘‘such lease or contract’’

13 and inserting ‘‘the contract’’; and

14 (2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘Such

15 leases or contracts entered into pursuant to such

16 Acts’’ and inserting ‘‘Such contracts’’.

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

18 subsection (a) shall be effective beginning on April 4,

19 2002.

Passed the Senate July 26, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1482

AN ACT

To amend the Act of August 9, 1955, to provide for

munity Reservation Contracts.binding arbitration for Gila River Indian Com-
No. 9095.

#### The State ex rel. Thrailkill *v.*Amlin et al., County Commissioners, et al.

(Decided March 13, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Franklin county.

*Mr. M; B. Earnhart*and *Mr. M. E: Thrailkill,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. E. L. Taylor, Jr.,*prosecuting attorney; *Mr. A. T. Seymour; Mr. Karl T. Webber*and *Mr. Wilbur E. King,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000723610
<NAME> STRATUS COMPUTER, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                          131683
<SECURITIES>                                     43187
<RECEIVABLES>                                   183381
<ALLOWANCES>                                      8320
<INVENTORY>                                      63283
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                441527
<PP&E>                                          355097
<DEPRECIATION>                                  232341
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  638921
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           115803
<BONDS>                                           3634
<COMMON>                                           260
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      519224
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    638921
<SALES>                                         406956
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                609329
<CGS>                                           214580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   434217
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (6622)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  56755
<INCOME-TAX>                                     13235
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              43520
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     43520
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.83
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22016]



[[Page 44287]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[ID-957-9820-02-ID04]


Idaho: Filing of Plats of Survey

    The supplemental plat of the following described land was 
officially filed in the Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 
Boise, Idaho, effective 9:00 a.m. August 11, 1997.
    The supplemental plat prepared to locate lot 4 in section 15 and 
lot 4 in section 28, T. 4 N., R. 4 E., Boise Meridian, Idaho, was 
accepted, August 11, 1997.
    This survey was executed to meet certain administrative needs of 
the USDA Forest Service. All inquiries concerning the survey of the 
above described land must be sent to the Chief, Cadastral Survey, Idaho 
State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 1387 South Vinnell Way, Boise, 
Idaho, 83709-1657.

    Dated: August 11, 1997.
Duane E. Olsen,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Idaho.
[FR Doc. 97-22016 Filed 8-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2187

STEVEN KRICHBAUM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; ROBERT JOSLIN,

Regional Forester; WILLIAM DAMON, Forester

Supervisor,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-96-1000-R)

Submitted: March 31, 1998 Decided: April 9, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Krichbaum, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Robert Haag, UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary

judgment for the Defendants in Appellant's action challenging the

United States Forest Service's decision to allow the harvesting of

timber on 187 acres in the George Washington National Forest. We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Krichbaum v. United States Forest Service, No. CA96-1000-R (W.D. Va. July 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1455 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1455

               To suspend temporarily the duty on XAMA 2.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 2005

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               To suspend temporarily the duty on XAMA 2.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. XAMA 2.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.09.10      (2,2-               Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Bishydroxybutyl                                                    31/2008
                         tris[3-1-
                         aziridinyl)propio
                         nate) (CAS No.
                         52234-82-9)
                         (provided for
                         subheading
                         2933.99.97)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
254 La. 519

#### JIM-ROY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Inc. and Hub City Investments, Inc. v. James D. PARKERSON.

No. 49741.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 25, 1969.

In re: James D. Parkerson applying for writs of certiorari and prohibition.

Writs refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction. Relator has an adequate remedy in case of an adverse judgment on the merits. 224 So.2d 539.

I concur in the denial of the writ. I am further of the opinion that, in the interest of justice, the trial judge should be ordered to re-open the case; that defendant should be ordered to file an answer within fifteen days, so that the matter may be heard on the merits, with all parties given their day in Court. In the interest of justice the rights of First National Bank should be reserved to contest the issuance of the writ of subpoena duces tecum.

FOURNET, C. J., and SUMMERS, J., are of the opinion the writ should be granted. In our view the subpoena was improperly issued “without cause” and Park-erson has a right to assert this defense, though technically not properly presented. See dissent of Summers in Raia v. WWLTV, 247 La. 1095, 176 So.2d 390 (1965) and La.R.S. 12:103; Code Civil Proc. Arts. 1436, 1492. Parkerson, as a substantial stockholder, has a right to the records of the bank and the right to object to their production when the request for production is unnecessary and will cause irreparable injury to the many bank Customers involved.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 159 (Monday, August 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21778]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Geosciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Geosciences (1756).
    Date and Time: September 3-4, 1997; 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. each 
day.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Richard A. Behnke, Section Head, Upper 
Atmosphere Research Section, Division of Atmospheric Sciences, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230, 
telephone (703) 306-1518.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals submitted to the 
Foundation in response to the Polar Cap Observatory project 
solicitation as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 USC 552b(c) (4) and (6) 
of the Government in the Sunshine Act.
    Dated: August 12, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-21778 Filed 8-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
EXHIBIT 24.1
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
  Dated: July 7, 2009
    
    /s/ B. Thomas Golisano

B. Thomas GolisanoDated: July 7, 2009
    
    /s/ David J. S. Flaschen

David J. S. FlaschenDated: July 7, 2009
    
    /s/ Phillip Horsley

Phillip HorsleyDated: July 7, 2009
    
    /s/ Grant M. Inman

Grant M. InmanDated: July 7, 2009
    
    /s/ Pamela A. Joseph

Pamela A. JosephDated: July 7, 2009
    
    /s/ Joseph M. Tucci

Joseph M. TucciDated: July 7, 2009
    
    /s/ Joseph M. Velli

Joseph M. Velli
#### In re Donald C. DeLOACH v. STATE of Alabama. Ex parte Donald C. DeLoach.

77-311.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 21, 1978.

J. Earl Langner, Birmingham, for petitioner.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., and Barry V. Hutner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, MADDOX, FAULKNER, JONES, ALMON, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

EMBRY, J., not sitting.
Responses to initials set of detailed comments/questions 

 Bill Maxwell 

 to: Cortney_Higgins 

 03/04/2011 05:02 PM 

 Cc: RobertJ Wayland, Peter Tsirigotis, Kevin Culligan 

 

Cortney -- 

Attached are our responses to the initial set of detailed questions. 

Thanks. 

OMB response 03-4.docx 

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: 919-541-5430 

FAX: 919-541-5450
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      10,231,524              10,231,524
<SECURITIES>                                60,327,337              60,327,337
<RECEIVABLES>                               31,184,303              31,184,303
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,624,885               2,624,885
<INVENTORY>                                 23,253,691              23,253,691
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           134,585,612             134,585,612
<PP&E>                                      62,223,952              62,223,952
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,167,300              14,167,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             222,688,188             222,688,188
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,240,883               7,240,883
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     3,042,373               3,042,373
<OTHER-SE>                                 212,404,932             212,404,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               222,688,188             222,688,188
<SALES>                                    150,062,671              38,995,250
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           150,062,671              38,995,250
<CGS>                                       55,557,988              14,023,414
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               55,557,988              14,023,414
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            47,915,277              12,202,943
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             52,467,578              14,805,751
<INCOME-TAX>                                20,454,058               5,692,057
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         32,013,520               9,113,694
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                32,013,520               9,113,694
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.06                    0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04                    0.30
        

</TABLE>