alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      21**

**Subsidiaries      of Registrant**

| NAME                                                             | STATE/PROVINCE                OF INCORPORATION |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
| Cintas                Corporation No. 3                          | Nevada                                         |
| Cintas                Corporation No. 2                          | Nevada                                         |
| Cintas                Canada Limited                             | Ontario,                Canada                 |
| Cintas                Corp. No. 8, Inc.                          | Nevada                                         |
| Cintas                Corp. No. 15, Inc.                         | Nevada                                         |
| Respond                Industries, Incorporated                  | Colorado                                       |
| Cintas                – R.U.S., LP                         | Texas                Partnership               |
| American                First Aid Company                        | Maryland                                       |
| Cintas                First Aid Holdings Corporation             | Nevada                                         |
| XPECT                First Aid Corporation                       | Kansas                                         |
| Affirmed                Medical, Inc.                            | California                                     |
| Cintas                de Honduras, S.A.                          | Honduras                                       |
| Grupo                Cintas de Mexico S.A. de C.V.               | Mexico                                         |
| Empresa                Cintas de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.            | Mexico                                         |
| LLT,                Inc.                                         | Virginia                                       |
| 3065520                Nova Scotia Company                       | Nova                Scotia, Canada             |
| 3065521                Nova Scotia Company                       | Nova                Scotia, Canada             |
| Cintas                Canada Investment Limited Partnership      | Alberta,                Canada                 |
| Ensambles                de Coahuila, S.A. de C.V.               | Mexico                                         |
| Cintas                Cleanroom Resources de Mexico S.A. de C.V. | Mexico                                         |
| Cintas                Document Management, LLC                   | Ohio                                           |
| The                Millennium Mat Company, LLC                   | Ohio                                           |
| Cintas                Service Transportation, LLC                | Ohio                                           |
| CDS                Equipment Holdings, LLC                       | Ohio                                           |
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries II, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: January 9, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries II, Inc.
#### Jose SUAREZ, Appellant, v. Yolanda SUAREZ, Appellee.

No. 76-1102.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 27, 1977.

Tobin & Fisch and Donald E. Krentsa, Miami, for apipellant.

Dubbin, Schiff, Berkman & Dubbin and Evan J. Langbein, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, NATHAN and HUB-BART, JJ.

*38PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of *Shaw v. Shaw,*334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); *Krasner v. Krasner,*339 So.2d 674 (Fla.3d DCA 1976); *Herzog v. Herzog,*346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977).
122 STAT. 4974 PUBLIC LAW 110–435—OCT. 16, 2008 

Public Law 110–435 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To amend section 114 of title 17, United States Code, to provide for agreements 

for the reproduction and performance of sound recordings by webcasters. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Webcaster Settlement Act of 

2008’’. 

SEC. 2. AGREEMENTS ON BEHALF OF WEBCASTERS. 

Section 114(f)(5) of title 17, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (A)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘small commercial’’ each place it 

appears and inserting ‘‘commercial’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘during the period beginning on October 

28, 1998, and ending on December 31, 2004’’ and inserting 

‘‘for a period of not more than 11 years beginning on 

January 1, 2005’’; 

(C) by striking ‘‘a copyright arbitration royalty panel 

or decision by the Librarian of Congress’’ and inserting 

‘‘the Copyright Royalty Judges’’; and 

(D) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘webcasters 

shall include’’ and inserting ‘‘webcasters may include’’; 

(2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘small commercial’’ 

and inserting ‘‘commercial’’; 

(3) in subparagraph (C)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘Librarian of Congress’’ and inserting 

‘‘Copyright Royalty Judges’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘small webcasters’’ and inserting 

‘‘webcasters’’; and 

(C) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘This subparagraph shall not apply to the extent that the receiving 

agent and a webcaster that is party to an agreement 

entered into pursuant to subparagraph (A) expressly 

authorize the submission of the agreement in a proceeding 

under this subsection.’’; 

(4) in subparagraph (D)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘the Small Webcasters Settlement Act 

of 2002’’ and inserting ‘‘the Webcaster Settlement Act of 

2008’’ ; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘Librarian of Congress of July 8, 2002’’ 

and inserting ‘‘Copyright Royalty Judges of May 1, 2007’’; 

and 

Webcaster 

Settlement 

Act of 2008. 

Copyrights. 

17 USC 101 note. 

Oct. 16, 2008 

[H.R. 7084] 


dkrause on GSDDPC44 with PUBLIC LAWS
PUBLIC LAW 110–435—OCT. 16, 2008 122 STAT. 4975 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 7084: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Sept. 27, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 30, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

(5) in subparagraph (F), by striking ‘‘December 15, 2002’’ 

and all that follows through ‘‘2003’’ and inserting ‘‘February 

15, 2009’’. 

Approved October 16, 2008. 


dkrause on GSDDPC44 with PUBLIC LAWS
#### Donnie Lee IVORY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 75-943.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 21, 1977.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Thomas G. Murray, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Ira N. Loewy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

WHEREAS, the judgment of this court, 330 So.2d 853, was entered on April 20,1976 affirming the judgment and sentence of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida in the above styled cause; and

WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment, 351 So.2d 26, filed July 14, 1977 and mandate now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment.

NOW, THEREFORE, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on May 12, 1976 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed April 20, 1976 is vacated and the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, the judgment and sentence of the trial court is reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial.

*135It is so ordered.

Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16b, Florida Appellate Rules).
No. 9389.

#### The Village of West Unity *v.*Coleman.

(Decided May 1, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Williams county.

*Mr. Chauncey L. Newcomer,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Charles E. Scott,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22159]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, September 19, 1997.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-22159 Filed 8-18-97; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
No. 44384.

#### Protest 746185-G of Century Trading Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is bodies, hoods, forms, or shapes similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protest was therefore sustained.
#### Jose A. MUNOZ, Appellant, v. The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO., Appellee.

No. 77-1383.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 30, 1978.

Robert K. Estes, Coral Gables, for appellant.

High, Stack, Davis, Lazenby & Bender and Alan R. Dakan, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, Jose A. Munoz, appeals a final judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict. Munoz claimed he had coverage for an automobile accident under a policy with the defendant, The Travelers Indemnity Company. The issue tried was whether or not Munoz had complied with an offer to reinstate the policy by depositing in the mails a check for the premium prior to the date the offer would expire.

There is no contention that the policy was not properly cancelled for non-payment of premium and the record reveals that there was evidence before the jury upon which it did find that Munoz had not complied with the offer to reinstate by paying the premium prior to the expiration date of the offer.1 We hold that appellant’s reliance *31upon the rule stated in *Morrison v. Thoelke,*155 So.2d 889 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963),2 is not well placed in view of the fact that it appears from evidence relied upon by the jury that the act to be accomplished was not the mailing of the letter, but rather the actual payment of the money for the premium.

Affirmed.

1

. The portion of the letter relied upon as the offer for reinstatement provided: “Also at this time, Jose Munoz policy is still pending cancellation for non-payment of premium. If not paid by May 13, 1975, this claim will be denied as no coverage.”

2

. In *Morrison*v. *Thoelke,*the Court quoted from Corbin, stating:

> * * * * * *

> “ ‘Unless it is clearly otherwise agreed, the mailing of a letter is not a sufficient notice to quit a tenancy, *it is not actual payment of money that is inclosed,*it does not transfer title to a check or other document; it will not ordinarily be sufficient notice required by a contract as a condition precedent to some contractual duty of immediate performance.’ ” [emphasis added]
Order entered August 29, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00458-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.R.R., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 354th District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 89497

ORDER

By this order, we remove this case from submission on September 22, 2022 

and set the case for submission today, August 29, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2. 

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Quarterly benefit statistics: railroadretirement and unemployment insurance programs
 
SuDoc Number:RR 1.16:
Item Number:0859-A-01 (online)
CGP System Number:000892211
 
2002: First | Second| Third | Fourth
2003: First | Second| Third | Fourth
2004: First | Second| Third | Fourth
2005: First | Second| Third | Fourth
2006: First | Second| Third | Fourth
2007: First | Second| Third | Fourth
2008: First | Second| Third | Fourth
2009: First | Second| Third | Fourth
2010: First | Second| Third | Fourth
2011: First | Second| Third | Fourth
2012: First | Second| Third | Fourth
2013: First | Second| Third | Fourth
2014: First | Second| Third | Fourth
2015: First | Second | Third | Fourth
2016: First | Second | Third | Fourth
2017: First | Second | Third | Fourth
2018: First | Second | Third | Fourth
2019: First | Second | Third
 
October 4, 2017
 
 **
# The heart of a mission

/ Published May 11, 2017
EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE, Alaska, Twice a day during NORTHERN EDGE 2017, maintainers work to ensure each pilot’s jet is prepped, properly fueled and ready to fly.Up in the air, members from the 909th Air Refueling Squadron out of Kadena Air Base, Japan, take over and ensure the training mission isn’t cut short due to a lack fuel supply.“We are here as force enablers and force multipliers who allow for longer missions for the fighter jets, so they can get the most out of their training time,” said Maj. Scott Karl, a 909th ARS KC-135 instructor pilot. “Without a refueling tanker, fighter jets would be limited on how far they fly and it would diminish the extent of training received.”Providing fuel for both red and blue forces during the largest exercise held in Alaska this year, lessons can be learned from all participants involved, including the tanker task force.“The amount of time spent in the air for the aircraft depends directly on how well we perform our job,” said Capt. Justin Munger, a 909th ARS aircraft commander. “I wanted our crew to learn to operate well with joint services and allow them to successfully experiment with their new equipment.”Refueling requires a large amount of coordination from all parties involved, from the tanker to the fighter jet, with the boom operator playing middle man.“It is my job to communicate with the approaching aircraft and keep tabs on how much fuel they need before disconnecting,” said Tech. Sgt. Chad Holloway, a 909th ARS boom operator. “We refuel about 10 aircraft each sortie and dispense about 170,000 pounds of fuel.”A more seasoned participant, with his eighth time performing refueling missions in Alaska, Holloway looks back at one memory that reminds him of the importance of training and the force multiplying capabilities his squadron brings to the fight.“I saw an F-16 pilot go down near the Bering Sea a few years back and we were the first to respond to the scene,” said Holloway. “We were able to call the Coast Guard and get him picked up safely which was cool to see and motivates me to keep going.”Although NE17 will soon be in the 909th's rearview, they will continue to support flying missions globally.  “The favorite part of my job is how flexible our crew is and having them to fly around with,” said Munger. “When it comes to supporting missions, we try to be there when we can, wherever we can, and as often as we can.”*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Eielson Air Force Base website.*
**Exhibit 10.18**

**Cintas Corporation**

**Executive Compensation**

**Fiscal Year 2006**

**President & CEO**

 

 

 
|   |                |   | **Current FY ‘05** | ** ** | **FY ‘06 Target** | ** ** | **% Change** |
|--------|---------------------|--------|-------------------------|------------|------------------------|------------|--------------|
| I.     | Base Pay:           |   |                    |       |                   |       |         |
|   | Target Bonus Award: |   |                    |       |                   |       |         |
|   | Total Cash Comp:    |   |                    |       |                   |       |         |

 
| II.    | Bonus Formula |
|--------|---------------|
|   |          |   |
|   | A.            | 37.5% Based on E.P.S. Increase |
|   |          | *Based on earnings per share increase over FY 2005 |
|   |          | (FY 2005 Diluted E.P.S. = $1.74) |
|   |          |   |
|   | B.            | 37.5% Based on Sales Increase over FY 2005. |
|   |          |   |
|   | C.            | 25% Based on Results of competitively sensitive Non-Financial Goals. |
|   |          |   |
|   |          |   |
|   |          |   |

 

 

 
| Signature: |         |   | CINTAS CORPORATION |
|------------|--------------|--------|--------------------|
|       | Scott Farmer |   |               |   |   |
|       |         |   | By:                |   |   |
|       |         |   |               |   |   |

 

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Energy personnel support QLLEX

By DLA Energy Public AffairsDLA Energy Public Affairs

                FORT MCCOY, Wisconsin  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

QLLEXexerciseDLA Energy
#### James Henry THOMAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1835.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 26, 1977.

*636Stephen L. Raskin, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Sidney M. Pertnoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was found guilty by a jury on two counts: (1) carrying a concealed weapon, and (2) unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He was adjudged guilty on both counts but was sentenced only upon the second count. On this appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction.

The defendant’s testimony was that he had just taken the gun from another who had threatened defendant with the gun. Defendant’s version of the facts was refuted by testimony that he denied to police officers that he had a gun and the fact that the gun was concealed in the small of his back. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed. See *Davidson v. State,*99 Fla. 732, 127 So. 342 (1930); *Duncomb v. State,*237 So.2d 86 (Fla.3d DGA 1970).

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 163 (Friday, August 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44684-44685]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22360]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5880-2]


Interpretation of New Drinking Water Requirements Relating to 
Lead Free Plumbing Fittings and Fixtures

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Section 1417(a)(3) of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), as 
amended makes it unlawful for any person to introduce into commerce 
after August 6, 1998 any pipe, or any pipe or plumbing fitting or 
fixture that is not lead free. In section 1417(e) as added by the 1996 
SDWA Amendments, Congress directed EPA to provide assistance for the 
development of voluntary standards and testing protocols for the 
leaching of lead from new plumbing fittings and fixtures relating to 
drinking water. This notice confirms EPA's position that performance 
standards for the leaching of lead from new plumbing fittings and 
fixtures have been established, as directed by the SDWA.
    The SDWA requires that, if a voluntary standard for the leaching of 
lead from new plumbing fittings and fixtures is not established by 
August 1997, then EPA must promulgate regulations setting a performance 
based standard for lead leaching from such components. The National 
Sanitation Foundation (NSF) established a voluntary standard, NSF 
Standard 61, section 9, governing the leaching of lead

[[Page 44685]]

from new plumbing fittings and fixtures in September 1994. EPA 
participated in the development of the NSF Standard because the Agency 
felt that, rather than promulgating a regulation, limiting the amount 
of lead leaching from brass and other alloys into drinking water would 
be best achieved through a voluntary standard, which is fully 
protective on a health basis and technologically achievable by industry 
in a reasonable period of time. In the Agency's view, NSF Standard 61, 
section 9 satisfies the requirement of section 1417(e), that a 
voluntary standard be established. Thus, the obligation to issue 
regulations is not triggered. See S. Rep. 104-169 ``104th Cong.), at 
95.'' Copies of NSF Standard 61, and the listings of products meeting 
this standard may be obtained from NSF International, 3475 Plymouth 
Road, PO Box 130140, Ann Arbor, MI 48113-0140. The telephone number is 
313-769-8010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Lassovszky, Office of Ground 
Water and Drinking Water (4607), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
401 M Street, SW., Washington, DC. For further information, call the 
U.S. EPA Safe Drinking Water Hotline between 8:30 am and 5 pm Eastern 
Time, Monday through Friday excluding Federal holidays, by telephoning 
toll-free 1-800-426-4791 nationwide.

    Dated: August 13, 1997.
Robert Perciasepe,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Water.
[FR Doc. 97-22360 Filed 8-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P