alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
omed-ex101_265.htm


[***] Certain information in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.

 


	
CONFIDENTIAL
	





 

Exhibit 10.1

 

AMENDMENT NO. 2 

 

to the

 

Multi-Product License Agreement

 

dated 22 August 2012

 

between

 

LONZA SALES AG

 

and

 

ONCOMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC

 

 

 

 

1

 




 

THIS AMENDMENT is made the 23 day of July 2015

 

BETWEEN

 

LONZA SALES AG incorporated and registered in Switzerland whose registered office is at Muenchensteinerstrasse 38, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland (hereinafter referred to as "Lonza") and 

 

ONCOMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., incorporated in Delaware whose office is at 800 Chesapeake Drive, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA (hereinafter referred to as “OncoMed”)

 

WHEREAS

 


	
A.
	
OncoMed and Lonza entered into a Multi-Product License Agreement dated 22 August 2012 (hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”), in respect of the use by OncoMed of Lonza’s proprietary System (as defined in the Agreement).




 


	
B.
	
Lonza now wishes to clarify the content of Schedule 3 in the Agreement.




 


	
D.
	
Lonza and OncoMed now wish to amend the terms of the Agreement.




 

NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, it is hereby agreed by the parties to amend the Agreement as follows:

 


	
1.
	
The words and phrases defined in the Agreement shall have the same meanings in this Amendment.




 


	
2.
	
Schedule 3 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced by the Schedule 3 annexed hereto. 




 


	
3.
	
Save as herein provided all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.







 

1

05Jun15/IS/FA/B17515




 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have caused this Amendment No. 2 to be executed by their respective representatives thereunto duly authorised as of the day and year first above written.

 


	
 
	
/s/ Michael Maskus

	
Signed for and on behalf of
	
............................................

	
LONZA SALES AG
	
 

	
 
	
Michael Maskus

	
 
	
Associate Director

	
 
	
Commercial Development

	
 
	
............................................TITLE

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
/s/ Nadia Zieger

	
Signed for and on behalf of
	
............................................

	
LONZA SALES AG
	
 

	
 
	
Nadia Zieger

	
 
	
Senior Legal Counsel

	
 
	
............................................TITLE

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
EVP, CSO

	
Signed for and behalf of
	
............................................TITLE

	
ONCOMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
	
 

	
 
	
/s/ John Lewicki

	
 
	
............................................




 

 

 

 

2

05Jun15/IS/FA/B17515




 

SCHEDULE 3

 

Media and Feeds

 

[***]

 

[***] Four pages in this document have been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.

 

1

05Jun15/IS/FA/B17515
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

447 KA 15-00654 PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MICHAEL H. CELI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THEODORE W. STENUF, MINOA, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
GREGORY S. OAKES, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, OSWEGO (AMY L. HALLENBECK OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Oswego County Court (Donald E. Todd, J.), rendered December 15, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the second degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a plea of guilty of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [3]). Defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal forecloses our review of his challenge to County Court’s suppression ruling ( see People v Kemp , 94 NY2d 831, 833), and his challenge to the severity of the sentence ( see People v Hidalgo , 91 NY2d 733, 737).

Entered: April 28, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1233 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1233

                For the relief of Diana Gecaj Engstrom.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 14, 2005

 Mr. Durbin (for himself and Mr. Obama) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Diana Gecaj Engstrom.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR DIANA GECAJ ENGSTROM.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Diana Gecaj Engstrom shall 
be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 
status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of that Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Diana Gecaj Engstrom enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
Diana Gecaj Engstrom shall be considered to have entered and remained 
lawfully and shall be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of enactment 
of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Diana Gecaj Engstrom, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
birth of Diana Gecaj Engstrom under section 203(a) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of birth of 
Diana Gecaj Engstrom under section 202(e) of that Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[106th Congress Public Law 449]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ449.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 1940]]

Public Law 106-449
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To modify the date on which the Mayor of the District of Columbia 
  submits a performance accountability plan to Congress, and for other 
             purposes. <<NOTE: Nov. 6, 2000 -  [S. 3062]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN.

    Section 456 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (section 47-
231 et seq. of the District of Columbia Code) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1) by striking ``Not later than 
                March 1 of each year (beginning with 1998)'' and 
                inserting ``Concurrent with the submission of the 
                District of Columbia budget to Congress each year 
                (beginning with 2001)''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2)(A) by striking ``that describe 
                an acceptable level of performance by the government and 
                a superior level of performance by the government''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1) by striking ``1999'' and 
                inserting ``2001''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2)(A) by striking ``for an 
                acceptable level of performance by the government and a 
                superior level of performance by the government''.

    Approved November 6, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 3062:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENATE REPORTS: No. 106-469 (Comm. on Governmental Affairs).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate.
            Oct. 19, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
```

[110th Congress Public Law 410]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ410.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 4318]]

Public Law 110-410
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic in 
    Hermitage, Pennsylvania, as the Michael A. Marzano Department of 
   Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic. <<NOTE: Oct. 14, 2008 -  [H.R. 
                                1594]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF MICHAEL A. MARZANO DEPARTMENT OF 
                              VETERANS AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT CLINIC.

    (a) Designation.--The Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 
Clinic in Hermitage, Pennsylvania, shall after the date of the enactment 
of this Act be known and designated as the ``Michael A. Marzano 
Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, record, or other paper of the United States to the outpatient 
clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a 
reference to the Michael A. Marzano Department of Veterans Affairs 
Outpatient Clinic.

    Approved October 14, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1594:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            Sept. 15, 17, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 30, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### Blackman, Appellant, *v.*Venturi.

Argued October 17, 1933.

Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Parker and James, JJ.

*Wilfred R. Lorry,*and with him *Thomas M. J. Regan,*for appellant.

*383
      *Oliver G. Biethmiller,*for appellee.

October 31, 1933:

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff seeks to hold the defendant, Venturi, re-, sponsible for injuries received in a collision between two automobiles, one of which was owned by the defendant. Plaintiff claims that although the owner of the automobile was not present when the accident occurred, the driver of the machine was his agent dr servant.

The jury found in favor of the plaintiff, but the court in banc decided (we think properly) that there was not sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict and entered judgment n. o. v. We quote from the opinion of the lower court:

> “It appears that Ercolani, Dolcemore, Ucchi and the. defendant Venturi were all friends. Ercolani was the son-in-law of Ucchi. Ucchi’s wife (Ercolani’s mother-in-law) was sick in Atlantic City. Venturi owned an' automobile. Ercolani told the. defendant, Venturi, about his mother-in-law being sick, and that he and his friends wanted to go the following day (which was a Sunday) to Atlantic City to visit her. Venturi promised to take them down in his car! Venturi, however, became sick, and so he said to Ercolani: ‘You go alone (along (?) and take these people down to Atlantic City.’

> “When the defendant Venturi was asked as to the reason for his planning to go to Atlantic City he answered: ‘I promised Ercolani to take them down to see his mother-in-law.’ Being asked, ‘For you it was just a pleasure trip?’ he answered: ‘Yes, just for the company. He had to go to see the sick.’

> “It would thus seem clear that the trip was originally suggested by Ercolani and was for the purpose of enabling him and his friends to visit his sick mother-in-law. Venturi obligingly agreed to take them in *384his car, he himself not being primarily interested in the purpose of the trip.”

> “The trip was not for the business or benefit of the defendant; he originally intended to act as1 host to his friends,■ one of' whom- was Ercolani, for whose benefit the trip was primarily designed. The defendant felt unable to go, and in turning the car over to Ercolani with the suggestion-that he take the group to Atlantic-City he was not making Ercolani his agent to carry out the defendant’s business because the defendant had no business or purpose to subserve by the trip. It was merely a case where Venturi found he was unable to go along, and dropped out of the party. He allowed Ercolani to use the car and to take the others. It would be unjust to allow a jury to find that Ercolani was acting-as Venturi’s agent on an expedition that was for Ercolani’s own benefit, and in which the defendant himself had no interest other than as Ercolani’s friend.”

The judgment is affirmed.
Phantom 2 - Specs I DJ I 6/3/15, 11 :56 AM 

Community v £!Y. Safe Cl:!llP-:1/Fiysafe.dji com) 

Search dji.com ... Q 

S~l:l!.t;p"//Www dji com/Prodqa/Phantom-2/S~ ~J:illp·f/Www dii com/Product!Phantom-2Nideol Downloads CHttp"//Www c[ji com/Product!Phantom-2/Downloadl 

tiiki.Jl::!.ttp"//Wjki dji com/En/Index pho/Phantom Zl ~Http"//Www djj com/Produq/Phantom-2/Dealer) 

General Features • Ready to Fly, Multifunctional Quad-rotor System 

• Customized H3-2D and H3-3D Gimbal Support 

• Precision Flight and Stable Hovering 

• 25min Flight Time & Smart Battery 

• Auto Return-to-Home & Landing 

• Advanced Power Management 

• Intelligent Orientation Control (IOC) 

• Easy Battery Replacement 

• Self-tightening Propeller 

• Video Downlink Support 

• CAN-Bus Expansion Module 

Aircraft Weight (Battery & Propellers Included) 

Hover Accuracy (Ready To Fly) 

Max Yaw Angular Velocity 

Max Tilt Angle 

Max Ascent I Descent Speed 

Max Flight Speed 

Diagonal Length 

Flight Time 

Take-Off Weight 

Operating Temperature 

Supported Battery 

DJI Smart Battery Type 

Capacity 

http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-2/spec 

1000g 

Vertical: 0.8m; 

Horizontal: 2.5m 

Ascent: 6m/s; Descent: 2m/s 

1Sm/s(Not Recommended) 

350mm 

25mins 

:>1300g 

DJI Smart Battery 

35 LiPo 

5200mAh, 11.1 v 

Page 1 of 2 
Phantom 2 -Specs I DJI 

2.4GHz Remote Control 

COMPARE PHANTOM 2 SERIES 

(lillp'llwww dji.com/products/compare.. 

Rllil.O!Qml 

CQ.mpare Now> 

{tmp·lfwww dji.com/products/compare= 

~l 

Charging Environment Range 

Discharging Environment Range 

Operating Frequency 

Communication Distance (Open Area) 

Receiver Sensitivity (1 %PER) 

Working CurrentNoltage 

Built-In liPo Battery Working Current/Capacity 

Djl OFFICIAL STORE 

{hnJ;!://store dj~hantom-2) 

Buy from the Djl Official Store 

~~ 

.B.uy..b!.Q.'il'_> 

O'C to 40'C 

-20'C to SO'C 

2.4GHz ISM 

1000m 

-97d8m 

120mA@3.7V 

3.7V, 2000mAh 

Djl AUTHORIZED DEALERS 

9 j/productlphantom-2/dealerl 

Buy from DJI authorized dealers 

Fjnd a local dealer>,!!~ 

2/dealer) 

6/3/15, 11 :56 AM 

HELP AND SUPPORT 

Wiki> 

{!Jnp://wiki.dji.com/en/index.P-b.P-/PI 

Downloads> 

{tmp·lfwww.dii com/P.roductlp..b: 

2/downloadl 

SJ.lp_Qort > Jl:®rttwww.dji.com/st 

After-sales Service Policies 

{http://www.dji com/servic· 

http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-2/spec Page 2 of 2
No. 9224.

#### Bettman *v.*Mossler, Admr.

(Decided June 19, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Messrs. Kelley & Hauck*and *Messrs. Moulinier, Bettman & Hunt,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Moses Buskin; Mr. J. L. Kohl*and *Mr. J. H. Cabell,*for defendant in error.

*513■ Judgment of the circuit court reversed and that of the common pleas affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew and Summers, JJ., concur.
# Distribution’s Expeditionary Team supports Operation Pacific Reach

/ Published April 7, 2017
POHANG, South Korea, DLA Distribution’s 25th distribution center, the Expeditionary Team is currently deployed in support of Operation Pacific Reach, which is an exercise conducted every other year. This year’s exercise is being held from April 10 through April 21 at Dogu Beach in Pohang, South Korea. The Expeditionary Team consists of 19 total personnel, 17 civilians and two military. 
The Expeditionary Team supports distribution requirements that cannot be completed from DLA Distribution’s fixed-base network of distribution centers. For theater deployments, their goal is to stand up a distribution facility that will receive, store and issue DLA materiel with the intent of reducing reliance on strategic airlift.

Operation Pacific Reach is a United States Forces Korea joint exercise program focused on integrating Republic of Korea and U.S. Alliance logistics capabilities within air, land, maritime, space and information environments that supports the defense of the ROK.  

The exercise is simulated to authenticate requirements of the logistic infrastructure associated with US strategy on the Korean Peninsula. The Expeditionary Team’s role is to deploy expeditionary capability to support the 19th Expeditionary Sustainment Command and DLA Distribution Korea during the exercise. The team will enhance USFK Theater Distribution Plan by establishing a theater consolidation and shipping point and provide tailored distribution support to USFK.

Approximately 1,200 ROK Forces and 2,500 U.S. personnel will participate in this year’s exercise.
# ------------------··

'I 'I /.·d 1z_ 

## !l 

# Memorandum· U.S.Departmentof Transportation Office oftheSecretary ofTransportation Subject: 

### Payout procedures as a result ofthe temporary closure of Vernal Regio.nlaAiort (Docket DOT-.OST-1997**-.2~06)**

# [Jfo~~**-l~~** 

# . . From: 

### Dennis J. DeV y, Chief EAS & 

### Domestic Analysis, X-53
To: 

### Gregory Frazier, Resource Directorate, S-3.6
Vernal Regional Airport (VEL) Date: 

### July 17, 2012 OAAMemoNo. 2012-71 Reply to Brian Swanson, X-53 Attn. of: Ext. 65392



### The Manager for the Vernal Regional Airport (Vernal, Utah) provided notice that Runway 16/34 would be closed for repair and painting, from approximately June 4, 2012, through June 8, 2012. Great Lakes currentlyprovides subsidized EAS at Vernal for arate of$1,062 per arrival/departure. It has been ourpolicy, on a case-by-casebasis, to pay EAS carriers their usual subsidyrate when airports have been closed on the grounds that the circumstances are beyond the carriers' control and there are only minimal cost savings to the carriers while they lose all ofthe

.. revenue. The carriers would only save on fuel andJa portion ofmaintenance because they would notbe able to turn back aircraft orlay-offpersonnel. Consistent witb this precedent, we ask you to compensate Great Lakes for flights itdid not operate during the closure periods noted above. Attachment

cc: Mr. Kelly Harvey, Vernal Regional Airport Mr. Chuck Howell, Great Lakes Mr. Michael Matthews, Great Lakes

### Swanson, Brian (OST) from: ·· Sent: To: Subject: Brian, '/ . i "'i-' Kelly Harvey <kjfam92@yahoo.com> Tuesday, July 17, 2012 1:31PM Swanson, Brian (OST) Re: Vernal for June 2012 .,. ' 

### " 

### .·.. ··, ·._ .

TheVernal airport closed Runway 16/34 for a Runway patch andpaint. The closure took place onJune 4th 2012 -June 8th 2012.
. · · · .· ·" · · ·. · . · ·

Hope this helps. Kelly From: "brian.swanson @dot.gov" <brian.swanson@dot.gov> To: kjfam92@yahoo.com Sent: Tuesday, July 17,2012 8:35AM Subject: FW: Vernal for June 2012 Hi Kelly: As notedbelow, our accounting folks received an invoice from Great Lakes indicating airport closure. We usually pay for short-term mnway/airport closures for various reasons, but weneed to draft a mcn1n for the file (and docket). The memo is typically drafted in response to notice from the airport and/or cmTier. I don't rememberreceiving anything specific. Cm1 you please send me a quick email indicating dates ofclosure with a quickjustification, so 

### I can draft a formal memo. 

### Ifyou have any questions, please let meknow. ManyThanks, Brian 

### (202) 366-5392 From: Devany, Dennis (OST) Sent: Tuesday, July 17,2012 10:26 AM To: Frazier, Gregory (OST); Swanson, Brian (OST) Subject: RE: Vernal for June 2012 Brian?? From: Frazier, Gregory (OST) Sent: Tuesday, July 17,2012 10:25 AM To: Devany, Dennis (OST) Subject: Vernal for June 2012 Hi Dennis, Who has Vernal? GreatLakes submittedfor payment on airport closure (looks like 6/4 -6/8/12), is there a memo or anything for that? 1
Walk-a-Lap for a Survivor
 
  By Dana Thornbury and Shari Murnahan
  Going the Distanceto support SAPR
*Sexual Assault Awareness & Prevention Month Challenge* Walk a Lap eventThank you to all the associates and service members that came out to show your support and raise awareness about the serious causes and effects of sexual assault. Starting the conversation and raising awareness is the first step. Often times, victims are scared or feel they are to blame. Walk a Lap event Hosting events like this one and our Going the Distance Challenge raises awareness and lets survivors know they are not alone. Events are geared to provide information, resources and options in a safe environment. Victims have reported that events like these where stories and resources have been shared gave them the information, resources and strength needed to report and know they are not alone.  Every 107 seconds an American is sexually assaulted.
    1 out of 6 women & 1 out of 33 men are assaulted in their lifetimes.
    We have a responsibility to do our part in not only preventing sexual assault but by educating ourselves on how to support survivors.
    It’s not always easy to know what to say when someone tells you they’ve been sexually assaulted, especially when that person is a family member, friend, or loved one. Consider the following**ways of showing support**:
    **Listen.** Communicate without judgment.
        **Be there.** If the survivor seeks medical attention or plans to report, offer to be there. Your presence can offer the support they need.
        **Encourage self-care.** Following an assault it is important to practice good self-care during this difficult time.
        **Offer support.** Encourage the survivor to get support. Share resources like the SAPR team has available today but realize that only the survivor can make the decision to get help.
        **Be patient.** There is no timetable for recovering from trauma. Avoid putting pressure on them to engage in activities they aren’t ready to do yet.  Walk a Lap Event
            Walk a Lap Event
            Walk a Lap Event
            Walk a Lap Event Circle of Support SAPR **Remind the survivor that you care:** Let the survivor know you don't see them differently and that you are here to support them.
    **Be a good listener:** Let the survivor choose when they want to talk and how much they want to share. **Do's** and **Don'ts** when talking to a survivor: **Do** concentrate on understanding the survivor's feelings.
    **Do**allow silences.
    **Do**let the survivor know you are glad they disclosed to you.
    **Don't** interrogate or ask for specific details about the sexual assault.
    **Don't** ask "Why" questions such as "Why did you go there?" or "Why didn't you scream?"
    **Don't** tell them what you would have done or what they should have done.  Protecting Our People, Protects Our Mission.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

MICHAEL SALVAGGI,

Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION 

AND PAROLE,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 10 WM 2021

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of April, 2021, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.