alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1.1


Schedule of Stock Option Agreements in the Form of Exhibit 10.1, Including
Material Detail in Which Such Documents Differ From Exhibit 10.1

         1.       Stock Option Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2001, between
                  the Registrant and Frederick A. Huttner

         2.       Stock Option Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2001, between
                  the Registrant and Robert H. Donehew

         3.       Stock Option Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2001, between
                  the Registrant and Anthony Charos

         4.       Stock Option Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2001, between
                  the Registrant and John F. McCarthy

The form of the documents listed above does not differ in material detail from
the form of Exhibit 10.1 except with respect to the identity of the director.

                                        3
Exhibit 31.2

            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, John W. Peters, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Suncrest Global
Energy Corp.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.



                                   /s/ John W. Peters
Date: May 12, 2005                ___________________________________________
                                  John W. Peters, Principal Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 12, 2022

No. 04-22-00490-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.H. JR., a Child

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CVPC-21-0000219

Honorable Robert J. Falkenberg, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating appellant’s parental rights, and this 

court must disposed of it within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed. TEX. R. JUD.

ADMIN. 6.2. The reporter’s record was due by August 4, 2022, and the court reporter filed a 

notification of late record requesting an extension until August 12, 2022. After consideration, 

we grant the request and order the court reporter to file the reporter’s record by August 12, 

2022.

It is so ORDERED on August 12, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT

FILE COPY
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Flanigan's  Enterprises,  Inc., (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 29, 2008,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission of the date hereof (the "Quarterly  Report"),
I, James G.  Flanigan,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  President of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  SS.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   This  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the  Company,  to which this
            certification  is attached  as a Exhibit,  fully  complies  with the
            requirements  of section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
            Act of 1934; and

      (2)   This information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents,
            in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition and results of
            operations of the Company.

Date: May 12, 2008   /s/ James G. Flanigan
                     -------------------------------------------------
                     James G. Flanigan, Chief Executive Officer and President
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 159 (Monday, August 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21766]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-116-000]


OkTex Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

August 12, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 7, 1997, OkTex Pipeline Company (OkTex) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 
1, the following tariff sheet, with an effective date of October 1, 
1997:

Tenth Revised Sheet No. 5

    OkTex states that the Tenth Revised Sheet No. 5 increases the OkTex 
Annual Charge Adjustment Clause (ACA) from $0.0020 to $0.0021 per 
Dekatherm.
    OkTex states that copies of the filing were served upon the 
Company's jurisdictional customers and upon interested state 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21766 Filed 8-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43265-43267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21622]



[[Page 43265]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Cancellation Pursuant to Line Item Veto Act; Taxpayer Relief Act 
of 1997

August 11, 1997.
    Dear Mr. President: In accordance with the Line Item Veto Act, I 
hereby cancel two limited tax benefits, as specified in the attached 
reports, contained in the ``Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997'' (Public 
Law 105-34; H.R. 2014). I have determined that each of these 
cancellations will reduce the Federal budget deficit, will not 
impair any essential Government functions, and will not harm the 
national interest. This letter, together with its attachments, 
constitutes a special message under section 1022 of the 
Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, as 
amended.
        Sincerely,
William J. Clinton.

The Honorable Albert Gore, Jr.,
President of the Senate,
Washington, D.C. 20510.
      
      
August 11, 1997

    Dear Mr. Speaker: In accordance with the Line Item Veto Act, I 
hereby cancel two limited tax benefits, as specified in the attached 
reports, contained in the ``Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997'' (Public 
Law 105-34; H.R. 2014). I have determined that each of these 
cancellations will reduce the Federal budget deficit, will not 
impair any essential Government functions, and will not harm the 
national interest. This letter, together with its attachments, 
constitutes a special message under section 1022 of the 
Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, as 
amended.
        Sincerely,
William J. Clinton.

The Honorable Newt Gingrich,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, D.C. 20515.
BILLING CODE 3110-01-M
      

[[Page 43266]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12AU97.003



[[Page 43267]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12AU97.004



[FR Doc. 97-21622 Filed 8-11-97; 5:08 pm]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-C
EXHIBIT 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

<PAGE>


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-135230, 333-36764, 333-70745) on Form S-8 of Oneida Financial
Corp. of our report dated March 24, 2008, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Oneida Financial Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2007.


                                                /s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC

                                                Crowe Chizek and Company LLC

Livingston, New Jersey
March 26, 2008
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, J.C. Chatpar, certify that:

- I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Cyber Digital, Inc.;   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such  statements were made, not misleading with respect to the fiscal year covered  by this annual report;  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial  information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material  respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the  registrant as of, and for, the fiscal years presented in this annual report;  
- The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for  establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in  Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such  disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to  ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its  consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those  entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being  prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and  procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the  period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control  over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent  fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an  annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to  materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;  and  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on  our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to  the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of  directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablelikely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls overfinancial reporting.
  June 27, 2006 
/s/ J.C. Chatpar
  J.C. Chatpar  Chief Executive Officer and   Chief Financial Officer
No. 99-7815.

#### Gutierrez-Gallegos *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 21, 2017

NO. 03-17-00351-CV

Kelli Charise Sharpley, Appellant

v.

Michael Alan Sharpley, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, FIELD, AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court. Kelli Charise Sharpley has filed a 

motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that the motion 

should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
No. 9452.

#### The Bankers’ Fraternal Union *v.*The Williamson Company.

(Decided February 20, 1906.)

*429Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Mr. George B. McKay*and *Messrs. Hills & Van Derveer,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Ford <§> Snyder,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 158 (Friday, August 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21677]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment of the Arts; Combined Arts Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Combined Arts Advisory Panel, Museum and Visual Arts Sections 
(Education & Access category) to the National Council on the Arts will 
be held on September 3-5, 1997. The panel will meet from 9:00 a.m. to 
6:00 p.m. on September 3 and 4, and from 9:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. on 
September 5 in Room 716 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20506. A portion of this meeting, from 
9:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. on September 5, will be open to the public for 
a policy discussion on guidelines, Leadership Initiatives, Millennium 
projects, planning, and field needs and trends.
    The remaining portions of this meeting, from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 
on September 3 and 4 from 12:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. on September 5 are 
for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and 
recommendation on applications for financial assistance under the 
National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as 
amended, including information given in confidence to the agency by 
grant applicants. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman 
of March 31, 1997, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant 
to subsection (c) (4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, 
United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and may be permitted to 
participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion of the panel 
chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal employee in 
attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506, 202/682-5532, 
TDY-TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D.C., 20506, or call 202/682-5691.

    Dated: August 12, 1997.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 97-21677 Filed 8-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Planar Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gerald K. Perkel, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                                                  
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/    GERALD K. PERKEL                                          
|    |  | Gerald K. Perkel President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director



December 13, 2005
#### STATE ex rel. Carter T. BUSH v. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 38123.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1969.

Habeas Corpus denied without opinion.
#### Ex parte William Melvin HERRIN.

SC 2700.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Aug. 26, 1977.

BEATTY, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, FAULKNER and SHORES, JJ., concur.
# Operations Center construction three-quarters complete, occupancy scheduled for end of January

/ Published Nov. 1, 2017
Richmond, Va. , 
Defense Logistics Agency employees at Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia have been watching the new DLA Aviation Operations Center grow floor-by-floor to a height of five stories over the last two years, while they wait to move into the new state of the art building. 

Well, the wait is almost over, according to Lee Scott, co-project manager, Installation Management Division, DLA Installation Operations at Richmond 

“The center is 75 percent complete and the move is tentatively scheduled between the end of January and mid-February,” he said. 

Scott said the contractor is currently concentrating on finishing up the last of the site work and paving the exterior areas. 

“On the interior of the building, the geothermal heating and air conditioning are operational and providing temperature and humidity control to aid with the ongoing wall and paint finishing process,” he said.  

The contractors are also installing carpet and furniture on floors 2 – 4, kitchen equipment in the cafeteria and performing system start-ups on various mechanical and electrical systems. 

“Over the next couple of months, they will complete interior finishes and furnishings in preparation for building occupancy,” said Scott. “As the building systems are completed and become operational, they will also be providing training to the [installation operations] personnel that will maintain the building. 

The DLA Aviation Operations Center construction will be completed in two phases.  Phase I construction is 252,000 square-feet and will house approximately 875 employees.  Directorates that will occupy the building include: DLA Aviation command group, Command Support Directorate, Customer Operations, Procurement Process Support, Business Process Support, DLA Information Operations at Richmond, DLA Human Resources Services, American Federation of Government Employees Local 1992 and the Base Supply Store. 

Once the move is complete, Building 32, Bays A - E will be demolished and have subsequent site work done,” said Alex Vazquez, engineer and co-project manager, Installation Management Division, DLA Installation Operations at Richmond engineer and project manager. “It is part of the contractual work for Phase 1 and demo should take place in the spring-summer 2018 timeframe.”

Phase 2 is in the preliminary design stages. The Army Corps of Engineers is currently evaluating the Phase 2 proposal of the architect-engineering firm that would take Phase 2 to at least the 35 percent design level.  Vazquez said Phase 2 soil exploratory drillings were completed over the past two weeks.  “The purpose of the drillings was to determine soil conditions in connection to the design of the foundations for Phase 2,” he said. Phase 2 is still planned for construction in FY2020. 

See related stories: DLA Aviation Operations Center construction continues; Ground-breaking, DLA Aviation Operations Center
#### Leonard FELDMAN and Paul Catillo v. STATE.

No. 37795.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1969.

Rehearing Denied March 4, 1969.

Certiorari denied Without opinion.
No. 00-7037.

#### Wade *v.*Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.