alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each ofthe undersigned officers of Minrad International, Inc. (the "Company"), doeshereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

        The Quarterly Report on Form10-QSB for the fiscal period ended September 30, 2005 (the Form 10-QSB) of theCompany fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-QSBfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

| Dated: November 14, 2005 | /s/	William H. Burns, Jr.                                                   |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     | William H. Burns, Jr.     President & CEO     (chief executive officer) |
|                     |                                                                        |
| Dated: November 14, 2005 | /s/	Richard Tamulski                                                        |
|                     | Richard Tamulski     Vice President of Finance    (chief financial officer) |
No. 96-5967.

#### McBride *v.*Circuit Court of Virginia, City of Norfolk.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.
```

[110th Congress Public Law 352]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ352.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 3982]]

Public Law 110-352
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
18 S. G Street, Lakeview, Oregon, as the ``Dr. Bernard Daly Post Office 
            Building''. <<NOTE: Oct. 7, 2008 -  [S. 3015]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DR. BERNARD DALY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 18 S. G Street in Lakeview, Oregon, as the ``Dr. Bernard Daly 
Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dr. Bernard 
Daly Post Office Building''.

    Approved October 7, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 3015:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            June 27, considered and passed Senate.
            Sept. 27, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                              21                     185
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,563                   1,889
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                             121                     179
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,480                  20,498
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,462                  16,088
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                         50                       0
<COMMON>                                       (4,468)                   1,365
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,462                  16,088
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,513                   8,491
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,556                   9,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 480                   1,041
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,043)                 (1,221)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (239)                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,804)                 (1,221)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,804)                 (1,221)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.32)                   (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.32)                   (.22)
        

</TABLE>
- About ARC
              - Appalachian Region
              - Program Areas
              - Grants and Funding

Research, Maps, and Data
            - Research Reports               - Asset-Based Development
              - Business
              - Demographics
              - Distressed Counties
              - Education
              - Energy
              - Evaluations
              - Export and Trade Development
              - Foundations
              - Health Care
              - Infrastructure
              - Leadership Development and Capacity Building
              - Socioeconomic Research
              - Telecommunications
              - Tools
              - Tourism Development
              - Transportation
            - Maps               - Economic Status
              - Education
              - Geography
              - Income
              - Population
              - Poverty
              - Unemployment
            - Data Reports
            - Economic Reports

              - Newsroom
              - Publications

|  |
|--|

HomeResearch, Maps, and DataMapsEducationRelative High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 1980

Print this pageEmail this page

## Relative High School Completion Rates in Appalachia, 1980

(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)
A high school completion rate is the percentage of adults, 25 years and over, completing 12 years or more of school. The percent of the U.S. average is computed by dividing the county high school completion rate by the national average and multiplying by 100. The map uses critical breaks such as the national average to organize the data into groups of common values.

Print

PDF version of the map (990 KB)

Excel file of supporting data for the map (80KB)

Data Report

Source and Methodology

Site MapContact ARCPrivacy PolicyWeb PolicyUSA.govOffice of  Inspector General
# Distribution Transportation Team ensures meals, water and other supplies delivered to those affected by hurricanes 

/ Published Sept. 22, 2017
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., Every March, the Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Headquarters Transportation Team works with Surface Deployment and Distribution Command on DLA/FEMA requirements to prepare a solicitation to the carrier industry for disaster support rates. When FEMA requirements are sent, the team utilizes the carriers and rates from this solicitation to quickly position supplies at the FEMA staging locations.  
As two major hurricanes recently ravaged parts of the U.S. the transportation team was able to test their skills. The challenges faced by the team include finding enough carrier resources to carry loads as FEMA has competing requirements that tap into those resources as well as private and charitable organizations all working to get supplies to the affected areas.    

The volume of meals ordered for Hurricanes Harvey and Irma has made scheduling transportation of 30 million commercial and five million military meals challenging. To date, nearly 1,100 trucks have transported shelf-stable meals, bottled water, cots, medical kits, toddler kits, tarps, sheeting to Randolph Air Force Base, Texas; Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama; and Ellenworth, Georgia, and more are scheduled to continuing shipping through next week.     

“Some unique challenges during this period have been subsistence vendors who ran out of product and were unable to meet their loading schedules and subsistence vendors who were in the path of Irma and had to evacuate and abandon their loading schedules,” said DLA Distribution supervisory traffic management specialist, Sherri Troup. “Our team has worked through the last two weekends to schedule these shipments including Labor Day weekend.”

The transportation team has shown true resiliency and extraordinary dedication.
**AUG**
               OCT
				**MAY**7**2007**
               2008
				**2009****15 captures**
           22 Apr 05 - 27 Jan 10
   Close
       Help


**Rock County**

Home

Return to Maps Page

County Map in PDF format

Click the name of the Waterfowl Production Area 
  below to see its map.



>
| Federal                                              | 000-33405                  | 36-4485429               |
|------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|--------------------------|
| (State      or Other Jurisdiction)                   | (Commission      File No.) | (I.R.S.      Employer    |
| of      Incorporation)                               |                       | Identification      No.) |
|                                                 |                       |                     |
|                                                 |                       |                     |
| 14757 South Cicero      Avenue, Midlothian, Illinois |                       | 60445                    |
| (Address      of Principal Executive Offices)        |                       | (Zip      Code)          |

| [  ] | Written      communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR      230.425) |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| [  ] | Soliciting      material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR      240.14a-12) |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| [  ] | Pre-commencement      communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR      240.14d-2(b)) |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| [  ] | Pre-commencement      communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR      240.13e-4(c)) |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

|                       | AJS      BANCORP, INC.                 |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                       |                                   |
|                       |                                   |
|                       |                                   |
| DATE:      August 30, 2008 | By:      /s/ Lyn G.      Rupich        |
|                       | Lyn      G. Rupich                     |
|                       | President/Chief      Operating Officer |
|                       |                                   |
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 13, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60784 Summary Calendar

MUHAMMAD TARIQ, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A78 565 762

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Muhammad Tariq petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen. Tariq has abandoned the petition for review from the BIA’s dismissal of his appeal from the denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. Tariq contends that the BIA erred by requiring him to support his motion to reopen with evidence that his application for labor certification had been approved. He asserts that this amounted to an improper adjudication of the adjustment of statusNo. 05-60784 -2- issue by the BIA and that the BIA’s failure to reopen the proceedings and remand the matter to the immigration judge deprived Tariq of his due process right to seek an adjustment of

status. The denial of a motion to reopen is reviewed for abuse of discretion. De Morales v. INS , 116 F.3d 145, 147 (5th Cir. 1997). A successful motion to reopen must establish a prima facie case of eligibility for the underlying relief sought.
See INS v. Abudu , 485 U.S. 94, 104 (1988). Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1255(i), an alien physically present in the United States may apply for an adjustment of status to become a permanent resident if he is a beneficiary of an application for a labor certification that was filed before April 30, 2001. The Attorney General may adjust the status of an alien who has received a labor certification if “(A) the alien is eligible to receive an immigrant visa and is admissible to the United States for permanent residence; and (B) an immigrant visa is immediately available to the alien at the time the application is filed.” § 1255(i)(2). The filing of a labor certification does not vest an alien with any right to relief from removal but is merely one step in the “long and discretionary process” of obtaining an adjustment of status under § 1255(i). Ahmed v. Gonzales , 447 F.3d 433 438-39 (5th Cir. 2006). The BIA did not abuse its discretion in determining that Tariq had not met his burden to make a prima facie showing thatNo. 05-60784 -3- he was eligible for relief under § 1255(i). Because such relief is discretionary, Tariq also has failed to show any due process violation. See Ahmed , 447 F.3d at 440. The petition for review is DENIED.
# Hildrich selected as deputy DLA Distribution Red River

/ Published Feb. 3, 2017
TEXARKANA, Texas, Fred A. Hildrich became deputy commander of DLA Distribution Red River, Texas on Jan. 8, 2017.
A native of southeast Missouri, Hildrich enlisted in the United States Marine Corps in 1986 and served 22 years. He participated in numerous operational tours with the Combat Service Support Detachment 36, 1st Light Armored Infantry Battalion, 1st Air Naval Gunfire Liaison Company, Marine Air Support Squadron 2, and Marine Wing Support Group 17. He also deployed in support of combat operations during Operations Desert Shield, Desert Storm, and Iraqi Freedom. In addition, he served as the S4 for Support Battalion at Parris Island, S.C., and worked as a canvassing recruiter in San Antonio, Texas.

After retiring from the Marine Corps in September 2008, he went to work for DLA Distribution Expeditionary, serving first as the operations officer in the establishment of DLA Distribution Yokosuka, Japan– Okinawa, Japan. He continued assignments as operations officer with DLA Distribution Expeditionary in Beaumont, Texas, during Hurricane Ike relief efforts, and Australia during Talisman Saber 2009. In 2010, serving as the operations officer, he deployed to Kandahar, Afghanistan, for the initial establishment of DLA Distribution Kandahar and later that year he participated in the World Food Program Pandemic exercise in Mombasa, Kenya. The following year he became the site manager at DLA Distribution Deh Dadi-II, Afghanistan, for the establishment of the Theater Consolidation and Shipping Point. In 2012, he participated in a humanitarian assistance and disaster relief exercise, Balikatan 2012, in Puerta Princessa, Philippines, as the DLA Distribution Expeditionary officer in charge. He was the site manager at DLA Distribution Portsmouth, Va., and then served as the deputy commander of DLA Distribution Sigonella, Italy, prior to his current assignment.

His military awards include the Defense Meritorious Service Medal, Joint Service Commendation Medal, Navy Commendation Medal, Joint Service Achievement Medal, Combat Action Ribbon, Navy Achievement Medal, and the Navy-Marine Corps Parachute Insignia along with other various awards. Hildrich holds a bachelor’s degree in transportation and logistics management. His civilian awards include the Meritorious Civilian Service Award (two), Superior Civilian Service Award, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, North Atlantic Treaty Organization ISAF Medal, and the Humanitarian Medal.
#### David CERF, Appellant, v. Grace H. KLEIN et al., Appellees.

No. 76-1326.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 9, 1977.

*669Stephen A. Cahen, Miami, for appellant.

Larry 0. Schatzman, Miami, for appel-lees.

Before PEARSON, HAVERFIELD and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant and counterclaimant seeks reversal of an order dismissing his counterclaim with prejudice.

The undisputed facts are as follows: Ap-pellee, Grace Klein, filed a statement of claim in the county court against the appellant, David Cerf, for money due for court reporting services rendered at his request. Cerf filed a counterclaim seeking damages in excess of $2,500 for invasion of privacy resulting in a transfer of the entire action to the circuit court. Klein moved to dismiss Cerf’s counterclaim for failure to state a cause of action. On May 17, 1976 the trial court dismissed the counterclaim and granted Cerf 10 days to file an amended counterclaim. On May 25 Cerf filed a motion for rehearing as to the May 17 order of dismissal and for extension of time within which to file an amended counterclaim. On May 27 Klein filed a motion for remand to the county court for the reason that Cerf had not filed an amended counterclaim within 10 days of the order of May 17. Cerf’s motion of May 25 and Klein’s motion of May 27 were heard by the trial judge who, at the conclusion of the hearing, announced that he was granting Klein’s motion for remand and denying Cerf’s motion for rehearing and for extension of time. On June 18 Cerf filed his voluntary notice of dismissal of his counterclaim. On June 22 the trial judge entered a written order denying Cerf’s motion for rehearing and for extension of time, remanding the cause to the county court and further dismissing Cerf’s counterclaim with prejudice. Cerf appeals that portion of the June 22 order dismissing his counterclaim with prejudice.

The principle of law established in *Hibbard*v. *State Road Department of Florida,*225 So.2d 901 (Fla.1969) is that a claimant has a right to voluntarily dismiss an action pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.420(a) after the court has dismissed the complaint with leave to amend if no further order has been entered by the court prior to the service of the notice of dismissal.

The record reflects that at the conclusion of the hearing of June 18 (just prior to Cerf’s filing his notice of voluntary dismissal), the trial judge announced he was granting Klein’s motion to remand the cause to the county court and denying Cerf’s motion for rehearing directed to the court’s order of May 17 and for extension of time. However, the judge made no announcement to the effect that he was dismissing Cerf’s counterclaim with prejudice. It was not until after Cerf filed his notice of voluntary dismissal that the June 22 order herein appealed was entered.

*670Reviewing these facts in light of the above controlling principle of law, we conclude the trial judge erred in entering that .portion of the June 22 order dismissing Cerf’s counterclaim with prejudice. We reverse that provision of the June 22 order and remand the cause to the circuit court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energy & Engine Technology
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September
30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Willard G. McAndrew, III, CEO and President of
the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.

/s/ Willard G. McAndrew, III
Willard G. McAndrew, III
Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2003



































                                     34
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-17-00368-CR

MICHAEL RAY WATERS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 432nd District Court

of Tarrant County (1464942R)

December 13, 2018

Opinion by Justice Pittman

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Mark T. Pittman_________________

 Justice Mark T. Pittman
# Fabric worker, EEO specialist honored for years of federal service

/ Published April 3, 2018
PHILADELPHIA, 

Two Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support employees were recognized for their service during a retirement ceremony March 29.

Dewey Smith, an equal employment specialist, and Nereida Rivera, a hand embroidery fabric worker, retired with 43 years of combined federal service.

Army Brig. Gen. Mark Simerly, DLA Troop Support commander, presided over the ceremony and said that there was something inextricably twined between the flag room and equal employment office, where the two retirees worked. 

“Every flag has to be perfect. The fabric has to be perfect. The same thing is true for EEO,” Simerly said. “The fabric of our workforce has to be flawless in the way we treat each other with inclusion, diversity and fairness.”

Smith first entered federal service working as an apprentice at the Philadelphia Navy Yard in 1986. He joined DLA Troop Support’s Equal Employment Office in 2008.

“It’s been an honor and a privilege to work for DLA and to help support America’s warfighters,” Smith said.

Smith plans to move to Florida and said he’s looking forward to fishing and playing billiards.

Rivera was hired to work in the hand embroidery room and later volunteered to learn how to operate the machines that assist in flag making.

She said that her greatest accomplishment while working here was being able to work on the flags for the president and the vice president of the United States, both of which are hand embroidered.

“I feel so proud that every time I look at the president and I can see the flag behind him, that I was one of the people that worked on it,” Rivera said.

Rivera plans to spend more time with her family during her retirement.