alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SLS International, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
John Gott, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael L. Maples, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ John Gott
-------------
John Gott
Chief Executive Officer
August 29, 2005


/s/ Michael L. Maples
---------------------
Michael L. Maples
Chief Financial Officer
August 29, 2005


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (Section 906 ofSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofBurzynski Research Institute, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe period ending February 28, 2009, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Burzynski Research Institute, Inc.and will be retained by Burzynski Research Institute, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Date:  July 15, 2009 |   | /s/ Stanislaw R. Burzynski                                                                                                                              |
|--------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |   | Stanislaw R. Burzynski, President, Secretary,Treasurer and Chairman of  theBoard of  Directors (Chief Executive Officer andPrincipal Financial Officer) |

 

----
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Vasogen Inc.

         We consent to the incorporation by reference herein of our report dated
February 13, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Vasogen
Inc. as at November 30, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements
of operations and deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended November 30, 2005 and for the period from December 1, 1987 to
November 30, 2005, and Comments by Auditors for United States Readers on
Canada-United States Reporting Difference in the annual report on Form 40-F of
Vasogen Inc. for the year ended November 30, 2005. Our reports appear in the
Form 6-K of Vasogen Inc. dated February 15, 2006.

We also consent to the references to us and the use of our name in this
Registration Statement.



/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants

Toronto, Canada
August 11, 2006
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/    | William C.      Gale                                                                            |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | William      C. Gale                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|   | Principal      Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|   | July      30, 2008                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |

|   |
|--------|

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of American Physicians Service Group, Inc. (the ”Company”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No.1) for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: May 2, 2007

 

/s/ William H. Hayes

 

| William H. Hayes |
|------------------|

| Chief Financial Officer |
|-------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Michael R. Kallet,  President and Chief Executive  Officer and Eric E. Stickels,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer of Oneida  Financial Corp.
(the  "Company")  each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that
he has reviewed the annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 and that to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the  information  contained in the report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

The purpose of this  statement  is solely to comply  with Title 18,  Chapter 63,
Section  1350 of the United  States  Code,  as  amended  by  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

March 27, 2008              /s/ Michael Kallet
--------------              ----------------------------------------------------
Date                        President and Chief Executive Officer


March 27, 2008              /s/ Eric Stickels
--------------              ----------------------------------------------------
Date                        Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 11, 2016

No. 04-16-00289-CR

Michael TURNER,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR3656

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant was sentenced on November 5, 2015, and filed a timely motion for new trial on 

December 20, 2015. Appellant’s notice of appeal was therefore due on February 3, 2016. TEX. R.

APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal was due on February 

18, 2016. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. The record indicates appellant did not file his notice of appeal 

until May 6, 2016, and he never filed a motion for extension of time to file his notice appeal. See 

id.

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this court’s jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 

981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1996). A late notice of appeal may be considered timely so as to invoke our jurisdiction if 

(1) it is filed in the trial court within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing; (2) a motion 

for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen days of the last day allowed for 

filing the notice of appeal; and (3) the court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Appellant has not met these requirements.

We, therefore, ORDER Appellant Michael Turner, to show cause on or before June 

1, 2016 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All appellate 

deadlines are suspended until further order of the court.1

 1

We also note the clerk’s record contains a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a pleabargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record appears 

to accurately reflect that this is a plea-bargain case and appellant has no right to appeal. Thus, even if a timely notice 

of appeal had been filed, this appeal would, in all likelihood, be subject to dismissal under Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 25.2(d). See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of May, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
NO. 07-12-0354-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

OCTOBER 8, 2012

______________________________

JUSTIN RODNEY ABLE, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 64,848-E; HONORABLE DOUGLAS R. WOODBURN, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

**MEMORANDUM OPINION**

Pursuant to a plea bargain, Appellant, Justin Rodney Able, was convicted of evading arrest or detention,[footnoteRef:1] a third degree felony, enhanced to a second degree felony,[footnoteRef:2] and sentenced to eighteen years confinement.  The *Trial Court's Certification of Defendant's Right to Appeal* filed in the case reflects that Appellant's case is a plea-bargained case with no right of appeal.  The certification notwithstanding, Appellant filed a *pro se* notice of appeal challenging his conviction. [1: TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 38.04(b)(2)(A) (WEST SUPP. 2012).]  [2: Id. at § 12.42(a) (WEST SUPP. 2012).] 

	By letter dated September 13, 2012, this Court notified Appellant of the consequences of the certification and invited him to either file an amended certification showing a right to appeal or demonstrate other grounds for continuing the appeal on or before September 28, 2012.  No response was filed.  Because Appellant has failed to file an amended certification reflecting a right of appeal and has not shown good cause for continuing this appeal, we have no alternative but to dismiss the appeal based on the trial court's certification.  *See* Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

	On September 27, 2012, the trial court clerk filed a request for an extension of time in which to file the clerk’s record.  Our disposition of the appeal renders the request moot.

							Patrick A. Pirtle

							      Justice

Do not publish.

2
#### Phyllis Friedson DOLLINGER, Appellant, v. Howard Irwin DOLLINGER, Appellee.

No. 77-933.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 25, 1978.

Rehearing Denied May 24, 1978.

Robert A. Shupack and Herbert J. Marcus, North Miami Beach, for appellant.

Edward P. Swan, Miami, for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON, J., and CRAWFORD, GRADY L. (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of *Dwyer v. Dwyer,*327 So.2d 74, 75 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); *Bell v. Bell,*307 So.2d 911, 914-15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); *White v. White,*296 So.2d 619, 623 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974).
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Pingchuan
Pharmaceutical, Inc. (the "Company") certify that:

1.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period
ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

August 11, 2006                         /s/ Yao Qitai
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Yao Qitai (Chief Executive Officer)

August 11, 2006                         /s/ Zhang Chunman
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Zhang Chunman (Chief Financial Officer)
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 5 (Friday, January 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-92]

[[Page 991]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Extension for the Final Environmental Impact Statement 
for the Proposed Airport, Angoon, Alaska

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Extension as required by ANILCA title XI.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities 
filed a title XI ANILCA application with the FAA, U.S. Forest Service, 
and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on January 9, 2015. ANILCA section 
1104(e), states that ``the final environmental impact statement shall 
be completed within one year from the date of such filing. Such nine-
month and one-year periods may be extended for good cause by the 
Federal agency head assigned lead responsibility for the preparation of 
such statement if he determines that additional time is necessary for 
such preparation, notifies the applicant in writing of such 
determination and publishes notice of such determination, together with 
the reasons therefore, in the Federal Register''. Due to complexities 
of the project, the FAA has determined that additional time is 
necessary to complete the final environmental impact statement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie Grey, AAL-611, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Alaskan Region, Airports Division, 222 W. 7th Avenue 
Box #14, Anchorage, AK 99513. Ms. Grey may be contacted during business 
hours at (907) 271-5453 (telephone) and (907) 271-2851 (fax), or by 
email at Leslie.Grey@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Additional details regarding the project can be found on the 
project Web site at www.angoonairporteis.com.

    Issued in Anchorage, Alaska, on December 23, 2015.
Byron K. Huffman,
Manager, Airports Division, AAL-600.
[FR Doc. 2016-92 Filed 1-7-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
# Deadline for ‘Real ID’-compliant driver’s license extended to June for some states

/ Published Feb. 14, 2017

If you have family members whose only ID is issued by one of an expanded list of non-compliant states or territories, they will not be able to use that ID for unescorted access to Department of Defense or other federal facilities after June 6, following an extension of the deadline by the Department of Homeland Security.   

However, all DoD IDs — including the Common Access Card, DoD dependent ID and DoD retiree ID — are already compliant with the Real ID Act.

After the recent expiration of a Jan. 30 deadline, DHS granted a limited extension until June 6 to Alaska, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina and Virginia. This means that barring any further extension, licenses from those states will not be accepted after June 6 for access to DoD or other federal facilities, unless those states have made changes to the licenses they issue.

Maine and Montana have now joined Minnesota, Missouri and Washington on the list of noncompliant states whose non-enhanced driver’s licenses and ID cards are not accepted for access to federal facilities. However, federal agencies **will** accept enhanced driver’s licenses from these states. 

Because the list of states complying with the Real ID Act is fluid, please refer to the DHS website for up-to-date information.
      - On Jan. 22, 2018 , any non-enhanced driver’s license or ID card issued by a state or territory not compliant with Act and not under an extension, presented to board any domestic flight, will be rejected. The passenger will need to show another form of ID to board the flight. A passenger with a license issued by a compliant state (or a state under an extension) will still be able to use the license or ID card to board.
      - On Oct. 1, 2020 , every airline passenger will need a compliant license or other form of compliant ID for domestic air travel. (Foreign travel will still require a valid U.S. passport.)

Noncompliant ID can still be used to obtain a CAC or a DoD ID card but cannot be used for unescorted access to DoD or other federal facilities.

The Real ID Act (full text here) was prompted by a recommendation in the 9/11 Commission’s final report. It set security standards for state-issued driver’s licenses and ID cards and prohibits federal agencies from accepting ID that does not meet those standards.

DHS’ full, illustrated 20-page guide on implementation can be found here in PDF format.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2341 

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to accept the quitclaim, disclaimer, 

and relinquishment of a railroad right-of-way within and adjacent to 

Pike National Forest in El Paso County, Colorado. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 24 (legislative day, APRIL 23), 2012 

Mr. BENNET (for himself and Mr. UDALL of Colorado) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to accept the quitclaim, disclaimer, and relinquishment of a railroad rightof-way within and adjacent to Pike National Forest in 

El Paso County, Colorado. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACCEPTANCE OF RELINQUISHMENT OF RAIL4 ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY BY MANITOU AND 

5 PIKES PEAK RAILWAY COMPANY, COLORADO, 

6 OVER NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LAND. 

7 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2341 IS

1 (1) COMPANY.—The term ‘‘Company’’ means 

2 the Manitou and Pikes Peak Railway Company, the 

3 successor in interest to the Mt. Manitou Park and 

4 Incline Railway Company. 

5 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

6 the Secretary of Agriculture. 

7 (b) AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT.—Notwithstanding the 

8 Act of March 8, 1922 (43 U.S.C. 912), the Secretary may 

9 accept the quitclaim, disclaimer, and relinquishment by 

10 the Company of the right-of-way described in subsection 

11 (c). 

12 (c) DESCRIPTION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY.—The right-of13 way referred to in subsection (b) is the right-of-way within 

14 and adjacent to the Pike National Forest in El Paso 

15 County, Colorado, that— 

16 (1) was originally granted by the Secretary to 

17 the Company under the Act of March 3, 1875 (18 

18 Stat. 482, chapter 152) for the construction of a 

19 railroad and station in El Paso County, Colorado; 

(2) is located in the S1 20 ⁄2 sec. 6, T. 14 S., R. 

67 W., and N1⁄2SE 1 21 ⁄4 sec. 1, T. 14 S., R. 68 W., 

22 of the sixth principal meridian; and 

23 (3) is depicted in a tracing filed as file number 

24 019416 in the United States Land Office at Pueblo, 

25 Colorado, on December 24, 1914. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2341 IS

1 (d) LIMITED APPLICABILITY.—Nothing in this sec2 tion affects the right, title, and interest of the Company 

3 in and to land held in fee title by the Company. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS