alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Augusten BONO and Dorothy Bono, his wife, Appellants, v. W. Norman DUBREE et al., Appellees.

No. 76-1144.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 20, 1977.

John T. Christiansen of Sales & Chris-tiansen, Palm Beach, for appellants.

Frank W. Weathers, Jr., and Jonathan D. Schumann of Weathers & Narkier, P. A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

On appeal is an Order of the trial court dismissing Plaintiff’s cause of action because of Plaintiff’s failure to comply with Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.260(a) by not moving for substitution of parties within ninety days of the filing of a suggestion of the death of the Defendant, W. Norman Dubree. The question of excusable neglect is a most troublesome area with which judges must deal. There are no guidelines for a trial judge to follow and in our perusal of the various cases we find appellate courts almost evenly divided on nearly the same circumstances. In this case we must agree with the Appellant that the neglect was excusable and therefore reverse the Order dismissing the cause of action with directions to permit the substitution of the deceased party and proceed to trial.

REVERSED with directions.

DOWNEY, J., concurs.

BURNSTEIN, MIETTE K., Associate Judge, dissents, with opinion.

BURNSTEIN, MIETTE K., Associate Judge,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent.

In this case, despite what appears to be adequate office procedure, a suggestion of death was mislaid or erroneously misfiled. Some 123 days later (33 days after the expiration of the 90 day requirement of *27moving for the substitution of parties in accordance with Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.260[a]) the error was brought to the attention of the appellants. Appellants thereafter moved for an extension of the time in accordance with Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.090(b)(2) which Motion was denied and an Order entered dismissing Plaintiff’s cause of action.

Time requirements under 1.260(a) were set in motion by the appropriate filing of the suggestion of death. *King v. Tyree’s of Tampa, Inc.,*315 So.2d 538 (Fla.2d DCA 1975). The question of excusable neglect for which time limitations may be extended is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial judge.

No abuse of such discretion was shown, therefore, I would affirm.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Minden Bancorp,  Inc. (The "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the  Securities
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, A. David Evans,  the
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                         /s/ A. David Evans
                                         Name: A. David Evans
                                         Title:  President and Chief Executive
                                                 Officer

Date: May 15, 2007

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act has  been  provided  to  Minden  Bancorp,  Inc.  and will be
retained by Minden  Bancorp,  Inc. and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



                                       25
No. 9045.

#### The Granite Wall Plaster Company *v.*Stroch, Admx.

(Decided April 10, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of' Ottawa county.

*Mr. W. G. W.eierman*and *Messrs. Smith & Baker,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. George A. True, iov*defendant in error. '•

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
#### Walter Clarence PHILLIPS v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 49752.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 2, 1977.

Joe M. Buchanan, Indianola, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by John C. Ellis, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Sunflower County; B. B. Wilkes, Judge.

Before PATTERSON, P. J., and ROBERTSON and BROOM, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6963

RAYMON REDMON HARMON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MR. BERNETT, The Head Programmer at Craggy; MR. BLAKE, Programmer at Craggy; MISS CROMER, Programmer at Craggy, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-39) Submitted: October 26, 2000 Decided: November 2, 2000 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymon Redmon Harmon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Raymond Harmon, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2) (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court, and deny Harmon’s motion for appointment of counsel on appeal as moot. See Harmon v. Bernett , No. CA-00-39 (W.D.N.C. June 20, 2000). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Succession of Louis J. MOHANA, Sr.

No. 61266.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 27, 1978.

In re: Joy Mohana Sonnier applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Terre-bonne. 351 So.2d 1287.

Denied.

SUMMERS and DENNIS, JJ., are of the opinion the writ should be granted.
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

36 37 38 39 40 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/25 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.95 WMeters AGL
#### Ephriam CULLIVAN, Jr. v. FISH ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., et al.

No. 61383.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 10, 1978.

In re: Employers Casualty Company and Fish Engineering Co., Inc. applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Evangeline. 354 So.2d 597.

Not considered. No rehearing applied for in the court of appeal. Judgment is final.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Dalton PREJEAN.

No. 60954.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1977.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writ of certiorari.

Writ denied. The ruling is correct.
OMB Control No. 2060 - 0347 

### Attachment to Partnership Letter **Organization Information** Chief Executive Energy Manager Name & Title: _______________________ Name & Title: _______________________ Mailing Address: _______________________ Mailing Address: _______________________

_______________________ _______________________

_______________________ _______________________ E -mail Address: _______________________ E -mail Address: _______________________ Phone Number: _______________________ Phone Numb er: _______________________ Facsimile: _______________________ Facsimile: _______________________ 

### Communications Contac t Name & Title: _______________________ Mailing Address: _______________________

_______________________

_____________

__________ E -mail Address: _______________________ Phone Number: _______________________ Facsimile: _______________________ **Organization’s Prim ary Business or**  **Function (check one) :**  □ Commercial Real Estate □ Corporate Real Estate □ Multifamily Housing, include **:**

_____ Number of units ow ned/managed □ K- 12 Education □ Higher Education □ State Government □ Local Government □ Federal Government □ Healthcare & Senior Care Fac ilities □ Hospitality & Entertainment □ Manufacturing/Industrial, include **:**

_____ NAICS code _____ Number of Manufacturing Plants Operated in the United States _____ Number of Employees in the United States □ Religious (Congregations) □ Retail □ Drinking Water Treatment and Distribution, include **:**

_____ Total Capacity (mgd) □ Wastewater Treatment, include **:**

_____ Total Capacity (mgd) □ Other. Describe: _____________________________________ **Organization’s t otal building/facility**  **squar e footage**  **(required):** Owns _____________________________________ Leases _____________________________________ Manages _____________________________________ **How did you learn about E**  **NERGY S**  **TAR ?** 

_________________________________________________ ____________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________ The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizin g respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (282 2T), 1200 Pennsy lvania Ave., NW , W ashington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control nu mber in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form to this address. EPA Form 5900 - 19
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350






In
connection with this Amended  Quarterly Report of Global Earth Energy, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edmund
J. Gorman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2009, fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and




2. The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending February 28, 2009,  fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Global Earth Energy, Inc.,






Date:
July   , 2009






/s/
Edmund J. Gorman


Edmund J.
Gorman


Chief
Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 25, 2023

NO. 03-21-00039-CV

Michael Garrett, M. D. and Kristin Held, M.D., Appellants

v.

The Texas State Board of Pharmacy, Ian Shaw, Bradley Miller, Donnie Lewis, Jenny 

Yoakum, Rick Fernandez, Daniel Guerrero, Lori Henke, Donna Montemayor, Julie Spier, 

Rick Tisch, and Suzette Tijerina, in their Official Capacities as members of the State Board 

of Pharmacy; Timothy Tucker, in his Official Capacity as the Executive Director of the 

Texas State Board of Pharmacy; the Texas Medical Board; Sherif Zaafran, Robert 

Martinez, Devinder S. Bhatia, James Distefano, Jayaram Naidu, Manuel Quinones, Satish 

Nayak, David Vanderweide, George De Loach, Kandace Farmer, Jason Tibbels, Sharon 

Barnes, Michael Cokinos, Robert Gracia, Tomeka Moses Herod, LuAnn Morgan, and 

Ebony Todd, in their Official Capacities as members of the Texas Medical Board; and 

Stephen Carlton, in his Official Capacity as the Executive Director of the Texas Medical 

Board, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on December 23, 2020. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order. The appellants

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
122 STAT. 4318 PUBLIC LAW 110–410—OCT. 14, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1594: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Sept. 15, 17, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 30, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–410 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic in Hermitage, 

Pennsylvania, as the Michael A. Marzano Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF MICHAEL A. MARZANO DEPARTMENT 

OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT CLINIC. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic in Hermitage, Pennsylvania, shall after the date 

of the enactment of this Act be known and designated as the 

‘‘Michael A. Marzano Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 

Clinic’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 

document, record, or other paper of the United States to the outpatient clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to 

be a reference to the Michael A. Marzano Department of Veterans 

Affairs Outpatient Clinic. 

Approved October 14, 2008. 

Oct. 14, 2008 

[H.R. 1594] 


kgrant on POHRRP4G1 with PUBLAW
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of
Global Wataire, Inc. for the quarter ending November 30, 2006, I, Edmund J.
Gorman, Chief Financial Officer of Global Wataire, Inc., hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.     Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending November
30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.     The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ending November 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global Wataire,
Inc.

Dated: January 17, 2007

                                  /s/  Edmund J. Gorman
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Edmund J. Gorman, Chief Financial Officer of
                                  Global Wataire, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2235]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations

    Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to 
the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 
985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978 (43 F.R. 
13359, March 29, 1978), and Delegation Order No. 85-5 of June 27, 1985 
(50 F.R. 27393, July 2, 1985), I hereby determine that the objects to 
be included in the exhibit, ``The Glory of Byzantium'' (See list \1\ ), 
imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within 
the United States are of cultural significance. These objects are 
imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign lenders. I also 
determine that the exhibition or display of the listed exhibit objects 
at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, New York, from on or 
about March 3, 1997 to on or about July 6, 1997, is in the national 
interest. Public Notice of these determinations is ordered to be 
published in the Federal Register.

    \1\ A copy of this list may be obtained by contacting Ms. Carol 
B. Epstein, Assistant General Counsel, at 202/619-6981, and the 
address is Room 700, U.S. Information Agency, 301 Fourth Street, 
S.W., Washington, D.C. 20547-0001.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: January 23, 1997.
Les Jin,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-2235 Filed 1-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
Marines celebrate 241 years of proud service
 
  By by Kimberly K. Fritz, DLA Aviation Public Affairs
  Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Marine Corps members and the inspector-instructor staff assigned to Hotel Battery, 3rd Battalion, 14th Marines, U.S. Marine Corps observed their 241st birthday with a celebration steeped in history at the Lotts Conference Center on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, November 10. The Marine Corps was established November 10, 1775 in Tun Tavern, Philadelphia, by a resolution of the Continental Congress.  The ceremony began with the reading of the 13th Commandant of the Marine Corps, Lt. Gen. John Lejeune’s message from 1921 that directed a reminder of the honorable service of the Corps be published by every command, to all Marines throughout the globe on the birthday of the Corps. It is republished every year on November 10.  Charlie Lilli, DLA Aviation deputy commander served as the guest of honor and spoke about his work with the Corps both as a civilian executive and during his Navy career.  In his speech Lilli thanked the Marines for their hard work. “I do have some connections with the Marine Corps during my career,” he said. “I was proud to serve as part of the naval service that included the Corps. The Navy and Marine Corps serving together as a team combines to form the most powerful expeditionary force the world has ever seen.”  Lilli congratulated the Marines for helping the Navy to be the most powerful and deadly force in the world.  Jokingly, he spoke of his current personal connection with the Marines. “My daughter married one.”  Lilli served on the USS Essex which was designed to carry Marines. He spoke of working alongside the Marines and admiring their professionalism and their team spirit. 
He thanked the DLA Aviation Marines for their self-driven, self-motivating, proud, aggressive team here at DSCR.  “Four Marines do the work of 50 and it is amazing to watch,” he said.
# New DLA Troop Support Joint Reserves Forces lead promoted to colonel 

/ Published Dec. 7, 2017
PHILADELPHIA, 

The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support’s new Joint Reserves Forces team lead said he was humbled, honored and grateful for the support of family and friends during his promotion ceremony Dec. 1. 

Army Col. James G. Gill was promoted from the rank of lieutenant colonel during a ceremony officiated by DLA Troop Support Commander Army Brig. Gen. Mark T. Simerly. Several of Gill’s family members and colleagues attended the ceremony.

“The journey to O-6 has been a long road with many obstacles,” Gill said. “I appreciate the encouragement and support I’ve received along the way.”

A Raleigh, North Carolina native, Gill described the values of duty and service being instilled in him through his family. His father was a World War II veteran and other relatives also served in the military.

“They all made serving the military our family business, and I appreciate that,” Gill said. 

Gill enlisted in the Air Force in 1986 as a medical material specialist and was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Delaware Army National Guard in 1991. 

“Since that point in time he’s had significant responsibilities levied upon him, and in every opportunity he’s met and exceeded the expectations of those critical career positions,” Simerly said.

Gill recently served with the Center for Army Lessons Learned where he performed duties as an embedded liaison officer in Iraq. Prior to that assignment, he served as the Army Central G4 Sustainment Operations division chief in Kuwait. 

“We’re extremely excited that James has joined our team,” Simerly said. “As Army officers, we lead within the guidelines of our Army values: loyalty, duty, respect, selfless service, honor, integrity and personal courage. James, you walk the walk every day.”

Gill said he too is excited about working with Troop Support’s staff and Joint Reserves Forces.

“The journey continues today as I accept this new challenge,” Gill said. “We have a lot of work ahead of us, we live in a forever-changing world with threats evolving daily. Fellow service members, I proudly join you on the rest of this journey. We have a great nation depending on us and we will never let them down.”

The Joint Reserves Forces executes local support and mobilization obligations. The joint team leader ensures the operational and administrative readiness of joint service reservists assigned to Troop Support.
**Corrected February**  **24, 2023** 



# United **States Court**  **of Appeals** 

**for the Fifth Circuit**

No. 17

- 20545

**Environment Texas**  **Citizen Lobby,**  **Incorporated; Sierra** 

**Club,**

Plaintiffs

— Appellees

,

versus

**ExxonMobil Corporation; ExxonMobil Chemical**

**Company; ExxonMobil**  **Refining &**  **Supply Company,** 

Defendants

— Appellants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:10

- CV

- 4969

**ON PETITION**  **FOR REHEARING**  **EN BANC** 

(Opinion July 29, 2020, **5 Cir.,**  2020, 968 F.3d 357 **)**

**(** Opinion August 30, 2022, **5 Cir.,**  2022, 47 F.4th 408 **)**

Before **Richman,** Chief Judge

**,** and **Jones, Smith, Stewart,**

**Elrod, Southwick,**  **Haynes, Graves,**  **Higginson, Willett,** 

**Ho, Duncan, Engelhar**  **dt, Oldham, Wilson,** and **Douglas,**

Circuit Judges

**.**

**Per Curiam:**  United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### FILED

February 17 , 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

ClerkNo. 17

- 20545

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for

rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service

and not disqualified having voted in favor,

**IT IS ORDERED** that this cause shall be reheard by the court en

banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify

a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pu rsuant to 5th

Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinions in this case dated July 29, 2020, and

August 30, 2022, are **VACATED.**

2