alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

                                                           STATE
                                                             OF
            COMPANY                                     INCORPORATION

   PMC Investment Corporation                              Florida
   Western Financial Capital Corporation                   Florida
   First Western SBLC, Inc.                                Florida
   PMC Funding Corp.                                       Florida
   PMC Advisers, Ltd.                                      Texas
   PMC Capital Corp. 1996-A                                Delaware
   PMC Asset Management, Inc.                              Texas
   PMC Trust 1996-A                                        Delaware
   PMC Capital Limited Partnership                         Delaware
   Asset Investments Series A, L.L.C.                      Delaware
   First Western Series 1994-1 L.L.C.                      Delaware
   FW 97 L.L.C.                                            Delaware
   PMC Capital, L.P. 1998-1                                Delaware
   PMC Capital Corp. 1998-1                                Delaware
   PMC Capital, L.P. 1999-1                                Delaware
   PMC Capital Corp. 1999-1                                Delaware
   PMC Joint Venture, L.P. 2000                            Delaware
   PMC Joint Venture LLC 2000                              Delaware
No. 00-7069.

#### Carlson *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# “Keys to Success” shared at Air Force officer promotion ceremony 

/ Published March 7, 2017
Richmond, Virginia , 
Everyone is looking for the keys to success and Air Force Lt. Col. Michael Allison, chief, Air Force Customer Facing Division, Customer Operations Directorate, Defense Logistics Agency Aviation, celebrated his success and promotion to colonel as Brig. Gen. John Kubinec, Warner Robins Air Logistics Complex Commander, Robins Air Force Base, Georgia, shared the secrets to becoming a colonel at the ceremony Feb. 28 held on Defense Supply Center, Richmond, Virginia. “I wanted to walk you through the path to become a colonel in the Air Force and the path that Allison took,” said Kubinec. “First you need to have a team around you. You can’t and won’t do it alone. It has to be a partnership from your family to your peers, mentors, and those who work for you. Second, you must bloom where you are planted. Third, that is a secret ingredient.” Kubinec explained that the secret ingredient is the defining characteristic of Allison; you care about others more than you care about yourself. “[If] you have an attitude of service, you have a heart that wants to help other people,” said Kubinec. “That’s Mike Allison, he is steady, he’s calm ... he’s always ready to serve others. That’s the secret, that’s not so secret.” 

Allison explained that although he may have blossomed in his previous assignments and always sought to serve others, to him it was the support and mentorship of friends and family that has impacted him the most in his career so far. “I’ve been fortunate to have a long career having been stationed in 19 different locations,” said Allison. “I was amazed at the number of folks who played an important role in my career and played a part in getting me here today.”  

The keys to success are three simple actions and the path to becoming a colonel has been laid out by Allison’s footsteps. According to Kubinec, they may be hard footsteps to follow. “He’s a good man and a good friend. We will be [well] served to have him as a colonel in the United States Air Force,” said Kubinec. “However, we don’t promote based on what you’ve done in the Air Force. We promote based on what potential you have to serve in the higher grade. Nobody in this room and nobody who knows Mike Allison would think anything else. He has the greatest potential to succeed and to serve as a senior officer.”
#### UNIVERSAL AMERICAN REALTY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Petitioner, v. DADE COUNTY, a governmental subdivision of the State of Florida, et al., Respondent. SOUTH DADE UTILITIES, INC., a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. DADE COUNTY, a governmental subdivision of the State of Florida, et al., Respondent.

No. 38801.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 28, 1970.

Rehearing Denied March 11, 1970.

Edward C. Tietig, of Patton, Kanner, Tietig & Segal, Miami, for petitioners.

Thomas C. Britton, County Atty., and Joan Elizabeth Odell, Asst. County Atty., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

These consolidated cases concern the rate of interest to be applied to delinquent tax payments where the Chancellor determines that a tax assessment has been challenged in good faith. The factual circumstances and statutory matter involved are given in the District Court’s consolidated opinion in this cause, 227 So.2d 317 (3rd D.C.A. Fla.1969). That Court has certified its opinion as being one of great public interest.

The issues raised here are adequately treated and decided in this Court’s opinion in Adler Built Industries v. Metropolitan *17Dade County, Fla., 231 So.2d 197. Therefore on authority of this Court’s decision in *Adler Built*we hereby reverse that portion of the District Court’s decision regarding the proper rate of interest to be applied. These cases are remanded for further treatment not inconsistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., ROBERTS, DREW and CARLTON, JJ., and VANN, Circuit Judge, concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 162 (Thursday, August 21, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 44416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22114]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-10; RM-8984 and 9033]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Dodgeville, Mazomanie and Mount 
Horeb, WI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Action in this document allots Channel 294A to Mount Horeb, 
Wisconsin, as that community's first local service in response to a 
petition filed by First Congregational Services. See 62 FR 3653, 
January 24, 1997. There is a site restriction 9.6 kilometers (6 miles) 
west of the community. The coordinates for Channel 294A are 42-59-22 
and 89-51-12. The counterproposal filed by Shopper Stopper, Ltd. 
requesting the allotment of Channel 257A at Mazomanie, Wisconsin, and 
substitution of Channel 294A for Channel 257A at Dodgeville, Wisconsin, 
is denied. With this action, this proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective September 29, 1997. The window period for filing 
applications for Channel 294A at Mount Horeb, Wisconsin, will open on 
September 29, 1997 and close on October 30, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MM Docket No. 97-10, adopted August 6, 1997, and released 
August 15, 1997. The full text of this Commission decision is available 
for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the 
Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street NW., Washington, DC 
20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-3805.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Wisconsin, 
is amended by adding Mount Horeb, Channel 294A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-22114 Filed 8-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
eg
| eae

m
om

0 OxtAoma

aaa

sos aa

V

far

Ct
| koraya

wasay

Kuva
MN

fous)

rai
Wo
Exhibit 32.1

Suncrest Global Energy
Corp.

CERTIFICATION OF
PERIODIC REPORTPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
18 U.S.C. Section 1350

| | The
undersigned executive officer of Suncrest Global Energy Corp. (the Company)  certifies
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | the
transition report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | the
information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: February 4, 2008 |  | /s/ Bruce Widener                                                                                    
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | Bruce Widener
                                                     
      Principal Executive Officer

| |  | 
| |  | 

---
#### Robert J. ARCHER, Appellant, v. CITY OF MIAMI, Florida, a Municipal Corporation, Appellee.

No. 77-671.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 13, 1978.

Rehearing Denied July 14, 1978.

*35K. Neil Glassford, Miami, for appellant.

George F. Knox, Jr., City Atty. and Mik-ele S. Carter, Asst. City Atty., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, plaintiff below in an action for declaratory relief, appeals an adverse final judgment rendered in favor of appellee, defendant below. The final judgment determined that appellant, a sergeant with the City of Miami Police Department, was not entitled to the rank of lieutenant in the force.

After reviewing the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, it is our opinion that the final judgment must be affirmed. While the record reveals that appellant held the position of lieutenant, receiving a lieutenant’s salary from March 29, 1975, to November 17, 1975, his status was officially designated as “temporary” up to June 17, 1975, pursuant to Rule VIII, section 7 of the Civil Service Rules and Regulations of the City of Miami. During the remaining five months, appellant was reclassified as a “probationary” employee. Rule VIII, section 6, subsections C & D of those same Rules provide that *prior*to the end of a *six month*period of *probationary*status, a probationary employee may be reduced in rank upon notice.

In November of 1975, one month prior to the running of the six month probationary period, appellant was notified that he was being reduced in rank to his former sergeant status, the grounds being incompetency, negligence and inefficiency. This procedure was in accord with the Civil Service Rules. As such, we believe the court correctly concluded that appellant was not entitled to the position of lieutenant.

We cannot accept appellant’s contention that the period of time he served as lieutenant while on a “temporary” basis should be added to the time served while on a “probationary” basis, thus resulting in a period of time greater than the six month period of probation and entitling appellant to the automatic promotion to the rank of lieutenant.

Accordingly, the final judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

Beacon Enterprise Solutions Group, Inc.

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officer of Beacon Enterprise Solutions Group, Inc. (the Company) certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

- the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                        |                            
|----------------------- | ---------------------------
|Date: February 23, 2009 | /s/ Robert R. Mohr         
|                        | Robert R. Mohr             
|                        | Principal Financial Officer

---
In The 

### Court of Appeals

For The 

### First District of Texas



## _____________ NO. 01

- 14

- 01018

- CV

______________________ RICKY D. PARKER AND JAMES MYERS, Appellants

V.
SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appeal from 268th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 14

- DCV

- 218252



### APPOINTMENT AND FEE REPORT

— MEDIATION
The Court referred this cause to mediation. Richard R. Brann was appointed
mediator in this appea l based on the agreement of the parties.
After the referral to mediation, the cause:

• Was mediated on August 20, 2015.

• The mediator was notified today, August 12, 2015, that
Appellant, Ricky D. Parker, and Appellee, Schlumberger
Technology Corporation, have settled all their claims against

each other.

Active 20338469.1 ACCEPTED 01-14-01018-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/12/2015 4:42:15 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK• The disputes between Appellant, James Meyers, and Appellee
Schlumberger Technology Corporation, did not settle.
Check one of the following:

☒ Based on the agreement of the parties and the mediator, the mediator
has been paid a fee as follows:
$ 800 paid by Appellants Parker & Myers.
$ 800 paid by Appellee Schlumberger Technology Corporation. The parties understand that the Court will tax this fee as a cost of the
appeal.

☐ The parties have agreed to another method of payment and understand
that the Court will not tax this fee as a cost of appeal.

/s/Richard R. Brann Richard R. Brann State Bar No.: 02888000 3748 One Shell Plaza 910 Louisiana Houston, TX 77002 Tel: 713.228.1563 Fax: 713:229.2763

Active 20338469.1 2
#### Maurice S. McGEE v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50084.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 14, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1978.

McTeer, Walls, Bailey & Buck, Robert E. Buck, Greenville, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Pete J. Cajoleas, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before INZER, P. J., and WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and ROBERTSON, SUGG, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1664 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on a certain ion exchange 

resin. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on a certain 

ion exchange resin.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MACROPOROUS ION EXCHANGE RESIN COM4 PRISING A COPOLYMER OF STYRENE 

5 CROSSLINKED WITH DIVINYLBENEZENE, 

6 THIOL FUNCTIONALIZED. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.30 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

9 by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 
2

•S 1664 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
# Joint Petroleum Seminar emphasizes collaboration, planning

/ Published Jan. 26, 2018
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency Energy hosted the 17th annual Joint Petroleum Seminar at the McNamara Headquarters Complex at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, Jan. 22-23. 

The Kabeiseman Conference Room was packed with more than 100 representatives from around the world and across the military petroleum community including DLA Energy regional commands, combatant commands and service components. Participants received high-level briefings, engaged in logistical discussions and challenged current business practices to expand their knowledge in the joint petroleum arena.

“What do we do to make ourselves better?” asked Director of DLA Energy Customer Operations Air Force Col. John Martin. “We take opportunities like this to build our relationships through the process, knowledge shared and networking.” 

During the seminar, participants discussed computer-based technology used to help calculate bulk fuel requirements, inventory management planning, a global petroleum distribution plan, expeditionary solutions to fuel storage and capacity as well as received briefings from the service control points.

“Petroleum, more than any other supply chain, is a team sport,” said U.S. Naval Supply Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center Regional Fuel Director Kevin Henderson. “The opportunity to get so many practitioners into one room promotes discussion, knowledge transfer, and problem solving across the spectrum of Class III logistics that simply can't be achieved otherwise.”

DLA Energy Americas Commander Army Col. Craig Simonsgaard led a discussion about Task Force America’s recent disaster support following one of the nation’s most challenging hurricane seasons. He said Americas regular participation in joint exercises testing the supply chain and its strong recordkeeping and accountability of the fuel were a big part of their success. 

“We were successful at those things we trained on over the previous two and half years,” he said. “We are aggressively incorporating lessons learned into the training plan for Americas – and across the DLA Energy enterprise – so that the next time this happens we can provide better support to our interagency partners and to tactical military units.”

Henderson said the seminar helped him realize the tremendous team of joint logisticians across the services and at DLA Energy who are working to solve problems and improve the petroleum supply chain.  

“The Joint Petroleum Seminar offers a valuable opportunity for a unique group of people who deal with fuel on a routine basis,” said DLA Energy Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Martin Chapin. “It is a unique community and we work really, really well together.”
Exhibit


Exhibit 10.1










Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such portions are marked “[*]” in this document; they have been filed separately with the Commission.


Amendment
NO. 2 
to 
Core Network Contract ERI-MAS-02007








Amendment No. 2


This Amendment No.2 to Contract Number # ERI-MAS-02007 (the “Contract” or the “Core Network Contract”) effective as of August 11, 2015 (“Amendment No.1 Effective Date”) is entered into by and between Ericsson Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Ericsson”), with a place of business at  6300 Legacy Drive, Plano TX 75024 and  Globalstar, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Globalstar”) with its principal place of business 300 Holiday Square Blvd, Covington LA 70433 (each a “party” and collectively the “parties”).


WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Contract to update certain Exhibits to reflect certain changes agreed to by the parties in Amendment No. 1 dated April 2, 2015. 
THEREFORE, the following changes and/or additions to the Contract are hereby agreed to by the parties:
		
	1.
	The revised Exhibit A, Pricing Schedule, dated July 13, 2015 and attached hereto replaces Exhibit A, Pricing Schedule of the original Contract.


		
	2.
	The revised Exhibit C, Payment Milestones, dated July 13, 2015 and attached hereto replaces Exhibit C, Payment Milestones of the original Contract.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Amendment No. 2 have caused their authorized representatives to execute this Amendment No. 2.


ERICSSON  INC.                GLOBALSTAR, INC.


By:  /s/ Johan Westerberg            By:  /s/ Paul A. Monte            


Name:  Johan Westerberg            Name:  Paul A. Monte            


Title:  Vice President of Sales            Title:  Vice President, Engineering & Operations




Exhibit A
Pricing Schedule


[*]






Exhibit C 
Payment Milestones


[*]
A- 1




---



##### 



A- 2




---



##### 



A- 3




---



##### 



A- 4




---



##### 



APPROVED:/s/William E. Griffin
    
    
    
    /s/James J. LandyWilliam E. Griffin
    
    
    
    James J. Landy/s/Stephen R. Brown
    
    
    
    /s/James M. CooganStephen R. Brown
    
    
    
    James M. Coogan/s/Gregory F. Holcombe
    
    
    
    /s/Angelo R. MartinelliGregory F. Holcombe
    
    
    
    Angelo R. Martinelli/s/Ronald F. Poe
    
    
    
    /s/John A. Pratt Jr.Ronald F. Poe
    
    
    
    John A. Pratt Jr./s/Cecile D. Singer
    
    
    
    /s/Craig S. ThompsonCecile D. Singer
    
    
    
    Craig S. Thompson