alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2144 GREGORY L. A. THOMAS, Chartered, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BELL ATLANTIC MARYLAND, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.
No. 96-2478 GREGORY L. A. THOMAS, Chartered, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BELL ATLANTIC MARYLAND, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA96-1488-PJM) Submitted: June 17, 1997 Decided: September 3, 19972 Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. No. 96-2144 dismissed and No. 96-2478 affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory Lee Andrew Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Donald P. Maiberger, ANDERSON & QUINN, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* To the extent that the district court’s order could be construed as a dismissal without prejudice for failure to exhaust state administrative remedies, we note that even if Appellant exhausted such remedies, there would be no federal jurisdiction over this case. 3 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals two orders entered in an action challenging billing practices in connection with a change of telephone service. In No. 96-2478, we have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. * Thomas v. Bell Atlantic Md., Inc., No. CA-96-1488-PJM (D. Md. Sept. 19, 1996). In light of this decision, the appeal in No. 96-2144 from the denial of injunctive relief is moot. Accordingly, we dismiss that appeal.We deny Appellant's motion to file a supplemental appendix. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No. 96-2144 - DISMISSED No. 96-2478 - AFFIRMED
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Vernell RICHARDSON v. Judge Israel M. AUGUSTINE, Jr., et al. Criminal District Court.

No. 60599.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 11, 1977.

In re: Vernell Richardson applying for writ of mandamus.

Granted. District judge ordered to vacate and set aside previously imposed sentence and sentence relator to life imprisonment at hard labor without eligibility for probation, parole or suspension of sentence for twenty years, the penalty for second degree murder at the time this offense was committed on August 8, 1973. La.R.S. 14:30.1, as added by acts 1973, No. 111. See *State v. Jenkins,*340 So.2d 157 (La.1976).
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICERS  PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14  OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

In
connection with the Annual Report of Burzynski Research Institute, Inc. ("BRI") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending February 28, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Stanislaw R. Burzynski, President, Secretary, and Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer) of BRI, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of BRI.

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report.

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of BRI as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4.     I
am the registrant's only certifying officer. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for BRI and have:



5.     I
am BRI's only certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to BRI's auditors and BRI's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):



6.     I
am BRI's only certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

| | /s/ STANISLAW R. BURZYNSKI                                                                                              
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Stanislaw R. Burzynski
President, Secretary,
Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer), and
Chairman of the Board of Directors

Dated:
May 28, 2003

---

QuickLinks
# NORTHERN 

# MACouNTY **-=:;~~~S--AIR** POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 150 Matheson Street, Healdsburg, CA 95448 

### Environmental Protection Agency 75 Hawthorne Street Air-3 San Francisco, CA 94105 ATTENTION: Laura Y anna yon



## • PH: (707) 433-5911



## • FX: (707) 433-4823 

### February
11
, 2016 SUBJECT

: Northern Sonoma County APCD rules recession request Dear Ms

. Yannayon: The District
is formally requesting the recession of Rule 10-Permits Required, Rule 12-Transfer and Rule 18-Conditional Approva

l from the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The provisions of SIP approved Rules 10, 12 and 18 are being replaced by newer provisions
in Rule 240, currently under review by EPA for SIP approval. If you have any questions regarding the enclosed permit please call me at (707) 433-5911. Rob Bamford Air Pollution Control Officer RB / avs S:\ RULES\EPA SIP Submitta

l Ru l e C hange

s Oct 2014 \E PA S I P Rule Review 20 1 6\Req ue st of EPA Rece ss ion of Old SIP Rules 10 , 12 and 18

. doc
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Miracor Diagnostics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, M.
Lee Hulsebus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
USC ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003,
that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

                                                       /s/ M. Lee Hulsebus
                                                       -----------------------
                                                       M. Lee Hulsebus,
                                                       Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 16, 2005
#### Billy Joe WEDENFELLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. GG-411.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 20, 1978.

Billy Joe Wedenfeller, in pro. per.

No appearance for appellee.

*194PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the denial of his motion to vacate pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850, urging that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to establish the offense of breaking and entering a building with the intent to commit grand larceny, contrary to Section 810.02, Florida Statutes (1973).

Appellant was provided a direct appeal to this Court. *Wedenfeller v. State,*323 So.2d 717 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). Since the present matter could have been raised on direct appeal, this issue is not properly raised in a, motion to vacate the judgment and sentence. *Stallings v. State,*319 So.2d 640 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); *Ashley*v. *State,*350 So.2d 839 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

The order appealed is AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and SMITH, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 22, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

129438 Michael F. Cavanagh 129482 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. RICHARD T. CLERC, Personal Representative of Stephen J. Markman, the Estate of SARALYN M. CLERC, Deceased, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129438 COA: 254940 Chippewa CC: 01-005641-NH CHIPPEWA COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellant,

and

ROBERT BAKER, M.D., Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

RICHARD T. CLERC, Personal Representative of the Estate of SARALYN M. CLERC, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129482 COA: 254940 Chippewa CC: 01-005641-NH CHIPPEWA COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee,

and

ROBERT BAKER, M.D., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applications for leave to appeal the August 4, 2005 judgment of the Court of A ppeals are considered and, pursua nt to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we
direct the Clerk to schedule o ral argument on whether to gran t the applications or take other peremptory action perm itted by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall submit_______________________________________ __ 2

supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this ord er addressing whether: (1) when
the trial court conducts an ev identiary hearing consistent w ith the gatekeeping obligation of MRE 702, described in both Gilbert v Daimle rChrysler Corp , 470 Mich 749 (2004),
and Craig v Oakwood Hospital , 471 Mich 67 (2004), and sa tisfies the requirements of MCL 600.2955, but determ ines that the proponent of the expert has not put forth
sufficient evidence that the ex pert’s proposed testimony is “the product of reliable principles and methods,” the trial court is nevertheless required to conduct a more “searching inquiry,” Gilbert at 782, before the court may exclude the expert testimony; (2) if a qualified medical expert testifies that ethical considerations preclude a scientific study that would yield suppo rting data for the expert’s opinion, the expert’s own knowledge and experience, with out such corroboratin g evidence, is suffi cient to establish a reliable basis for this opinion in sa tisfaction of MRE 702, as described in Gilbert,

supra, and Craig, supra ; and (3) if the trial court finds the expert’s an ecdotal evidence based on the expert’s own knowledge and exp erience insufficient to show a reliable basis for the expert’s opinion and permits the expert’s proponent an op portunity to provide additional corroborating evidence, the pr oponent’s failure to provide a dditional corroborating evidence cons titutes a waiver of any further “searching inquiry.”

p0919 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 22, 2006

Clerk
# Troop Support Hall of Fame inductees for 2017 announced

/ Published Aug. 30, 2017
PHILADELPHIA, 

Army Col. Mark Simerly, Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support commander, announced the 2017 inductees for the DLA Troop Support Hall of Fame:
        -  Army Maj. Gen. Steven Shapiro, former commander, DLA Troop Support 
        -  Christos Cosfol, former deputy director, Procurement Process Support 
        -  Ray Miller, former deputy director, Subsistence 

“All of these individuals made an everlasting contribution to Troop Support,” Simerly said, “and collectively, we are a better organization as a result of their efforts ... now and in the future.”

The Hall of Fame ceremony will be held Nov. 21 at the Bldg. 6 auditorium at Naval Support Activity Philadelphia.
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2013 - 0490 Directorate ID : 2008 - SW - 00 4 - AD Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Model 407 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 472 Helicopters in the US Reg istry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to alert pilots to avoid certain engine speeds during steady- state operations, prevent failure of the third stage engine turbine, engine power loss, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Cost s : Parts per Helicopter $ 20 for the decal Labor per Helicopter ( 0.5 work- hour x $ 8 5 /work - hour to update the RFM ) (0.2 work- hour x $85/work- hour to install the decal) $ 43

$17 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 80 Total US Fleet Cost $ 37,760 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Chinh Vuong
Investigative analyst is first Installation Support Security Specialist of the Year
 
  By DLA Security and Emergency Services
  An investigative analyst at Defense Logistics Agency Aviation in Richmond recently received the first-ever award recognizing the top civilian security specialist across all of DLA Installation Support.  Donald Bartlett received the Installation Support Security Specialist of the Year Award Dec 15. Bartlett gathers, updates, summarizes, and reports on activities that threaten the mission or personnel at the Defense Supply Center Richmond and tenant activities. In doing so, he works closely with the local Joint Terrorism Task Force, other federal agencies and the greater Richmond community.  A panel of three judges reviewed nine nominations, choosing two finalists to forward to Patrick Wright, staff director of Security and Emergency Services at DLA HHeadquarters, who made the final choice.  In presenting the award, Wright noted: “The enterprise security team’s role is critical to the success of the DLA mission and directly supports our DLA Strategic Plan by addressing and mitigating risk to ensure the resiliency and security of the DLA mission and workforce.”  Wright said the award was created to increase recognition for civilian security specialists by acknowledging the critical work they do across DLA Installation Support.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6062

GREGORY DONNELL USRY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE JOHNSON, Director, VDOC; COMMONWEALTH OF

VIRGINIA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (CA-03-260-7)

Submitted: March 11, 2004 Decided: March 19, 2004

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Donnell Usry, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Donnell Usry seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a

§ 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Usry has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of American Physicians Service Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
      the Company.



/s/ Kenneth S. Shifrin
-------------------------
Kenneth S. Shifrin                                Date:  March 13, 2006
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                         221,041
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,009,350
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,021
<INVENTORY>                                  2,695,470
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,481,969
<PP&E>                                       2,640,560
<DEPRECIATION>                                 301,999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,122,529
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,450,487
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,130
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,514,710
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,122,529
<SALES>                                      9,003,408
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,020,247
<CGS>                                        7,307,587
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  908,743
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             272,669
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                531,248
<INCOME-TAX>                                   180,009
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            351,239
<DISCONTINUED>                                 266,528
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    84,711
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1453 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Desmodur VP LS 2253. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2005 

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Desmodur VP LS 2253. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESMODUR VP LS 2253. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.09.05 3,5-Dimethylpyrazoleblocked hexamethylene 

diisocyante based adduct in 

organic solvent (CAS No. 

163206–31–3) (provided for 

in subheading 3911.90.90) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•S 1453 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131794 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131794 

 COA: 267250 

Saginaw CC: 01-020216-FC 

WILLIAM J. MOORE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 22, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1218 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 28, 2006 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32.1


  Certification of Chief Executive  Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Big Sky Industries
I, Inc. (the  "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Carl
Olivieri, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


    Date: October 1, 2008                           /s/Carl Olivieri
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Carl Olivieri
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
No. 00-6847.

#### Buggs *v.*Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.