alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Distribution’s Kopsick receives AFRICOM’s Interagency Partner of the Year award

/ Published April 14, 2017
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, Edward Kopsick, logistics management specialist with Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, has received the United States Africa Command Interagency Partner of the Year award for his work in supporting distribution operations in the area of responsibility.
During the Zika outbreak in early 2016, Kopsick facilitated the distribution of a disinfectant spray in support of airlift operations, ensuring support to troops in the fight.  

He was a key DLA planner in the concept development of DLA Distribution Djibouti.  The site represents the first DLA Distribution enduring presence on the continent of Africa and a shift in USAFRICOM’s logistics priorities from solely expeditionary logistics to an enduring commitment at the national, strategic level.

Optimizing surface movement, lowering airlift demand, and saving dollars, Kopsick mentored units to develop concepts of logistics operations and articulated DLA’s capabilities to component leaders, enhancing decision cycles and leadership awareness.  “He is the voice of DLA,” said Army Col. Eric Hefner, USAFRICOM commandant.  “He enabled candid discussion on distribution issues, helping us make strategic inroads.”

Kopsick directly supported several annual operations, including Flintlock and African Lion.  During Flintlock, he orchestrated subsistence procurement, ensuring food for more than 2,000 participants.  For African Lion, he coordinated with Marine Corps Forces Africa to forecast supply for the annual field exercise in Morocco and Tunisia.

In support of humanitarian efforts in the region, he led the aggregation of humanitarian aid to Libya, including organizing the procurement and storage of life-saving assets.

“Ed is a true professional team player,” said Hefner.  “He gains knowledge and applies it immediately, and is an absolutely inspired contributor.”
# San Diego’s culture committee teams up with local NPOs

/ Published June 14, 2017
San Diego, 
The Culture Committee at Defense Logistics Agency Aviation-San Diego collaborated with a local non-profit organization and held a clothing drive in May.

The committee's charter teamed with Gently Hugged, a local organization who provides new and gently used baby clothing/items from the ages of newborn to 1-year-olds throughout San Diego County as a means of giving back to those communities where we work and live. Nurses in the county teamed with social service agencies to identify the families in need.  This teaming event developed comradery and built positive relationships between DLA Aviation-San Diego’s employees and the local community.

The response from employees was huge and over 200 articles of clothing and toys were collected. This provided many families in need with the basics to clothe and care for their babies. Donations bins were set up in several buildings throughout the command for employees to donate.

The clothes donated were in preemie to 12-month sizes, along with blankets and accessories (including hats, socks, bibs). The items were sorted and were placed in boxes labeled for a baby "boy" or "girl".

Multilingual educational materials related to sudden infant death syndrome, or SIDS, and information on other prevention issues were also included with each package. 

The boxes were distributed by nurses and social workers to low income, military, immigrant, and foster families in need within underserved areas.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT MARCELIS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 421 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of January, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. George WILSON.

No. 60884.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 1977.

In re: George Wilson applying for writ of mandamus.

*173Writ denied. Since an order issued on August 18 to return relator to Parish Prison, this application is now moot.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1601 

To extend temporarily the duty suspension on certain semi-manufactured 

forms of gold. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 29, 2005 

Mr. CRAIG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the duty suspension on certain semimanufactured forms of gold. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SEMI-MANUFACTURED FORMS OF 

4 GOLD. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.71.08 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘12/31/2003’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2010’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or with-
2 

•S 1601 IS

1 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this 

3 Act. 

4 (2) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION.—Notwith5 standing section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or 

6 any other provision of law, upon proper request filed 

7 with U.S. Customs and Border Protection before the 

8 180th day after the date of enactment of this Act, 

9 the entry of any article— 

10 (A) that was made on or after January 1, 

11 2004, and before the 15th day after the date of 

12 the enactment of this Act, and 

13 (B) with respect to which there would have 

14 been no duty if the amendment made by sub15 section (a) were in effect on the date of such 

16 entry, 

17 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such amend18 ment applied to such entry, and any amounts owed 

19 shall be paid to the importer of record. 

Æ
No. 74-6582.

#### Richardson *v.*Rundle, Correctional Superintendent.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 511 F. 2d 1396.
`[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 152 (Thursday, August 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42511-42515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20793]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary
[Transmittal No. 97-31]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Assistance Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Pub. L. 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSAA/COMPT/CPD, (703) 
604-6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 97-31, with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and 620C(d).

    Dated: July 31, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M

[[Page 42512]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07AU97.000



[[Page 42513]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07AU97.001



[[Page 42514]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07AU97.002



[[Page 42515]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07AU97.003



[FR Doc. 97-20793 Filed 8-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-C`
**JUN**
               OCT
				**MAY**6**2007**
               2008
				**2012****12 captures**
           22 Apr 05 - 31 Mar 12
   Close
       Help


**Oconto County**

Home

Return to Maps Page

County Map in PDF format

Click the name of the Waterfowl Production Area 
  below to see its map.



Topo 
    Map  3D 
    Map






>
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547 

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

July 14, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Bldg. 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

RE: Summary Grant for HighCastle Systems, LLC Exemption Request Under 

Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and 

Reform Act of 2012, 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), 49 

U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, HighCastle Systems, LLC. (HighCastle 

Systems, ), an aerial video and photography service company and operator of small 

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS), seeks an exemption from the following listed Code 

of Federal Regulations (CFR) to allow commercial operation of the DJI Phantom 3 

Professional within the National Airspace System (NAS) for controlled, low-risk, aerial 

video and photography of Real Estate Properties (for homeowners, realtors, home 

builders, home contractors and / or home inspectors for real estate marketing and 

inspection of home exteriors) as well as filming of special events. 

HighCastle Systems, in the accompanying petition, seeks exemption from the 

requirements of 14 C.F.R. §§ 45.27(a), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.105, 91.119(c), 

91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2),and 91.417(a) and (b). 

HighCastle Systems has requested that the FAA not request public comment on its

petition because it would not set any precedent and because the relief requested is 

identical to numerous exemptions granted previously. 14 C.F.R. § 11.87. 

In addition, HighCastle Systems will be utilizing the same DJI proven technologies the 

FAA has already accepted and approved for numerous other Section 333 exemptions. 

All of the appropriate documentation to accompany HighCastle Systems Section 333 

Petition is included. Combined, their comprehensive Section 333 Exemption and the 

approvals the FAA has already given to DJI products and the technology, should provide 

the support necessary to the FAA for a Summary Grant of HighCastle System’s Section 
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547 

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

333 Petition and expedite the process. 

Kelly J. Neubecker

CEO

UASolutions Group, Inc.

CC:

Bill Crozier

Joe Morra

Jake Troutman

Dean Griffith, Esq.

Robert Papas
```

[106th Congress Public Law 493]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ493.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 2213]]

Public Law 106-493
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
       To provide for equal exchanges of land around the Cascade 
             Reservoir. <<NOTE: Nov. 9, 2000 -  [S. 1778]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXCHANGES <<NOTE: 16 USC 486a-486a note.>>  OF LAND 
                            EXCESS TO CASCADE RESERVOIR 
                            RECLAMATION PROJECT.

    Section 5 of Public Law 86-92 (73 Stat. 219) is amended by striking 
subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Land Exchanges.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may exchange land of either 
        class described in subsection (a) for non-Federal land of not 
        less than approximately equal value, as determined by an 
        appraisal carried out in accordance with--
                    ``(A) the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real 
                Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
                4601 et seq.); and
                    ``(B) the publication entitled `Uniform Appraisal 
                Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions', as amended by 
                the Interagency Land Acquisition Conference in 
                consultation with the Department of Justice.
            ``(2) Equalization.--If the land exchanged under paragraph 
        (1) is not of equal value, the values shall be equalized by the 
        payment of funds by the Secretary or the grantor, as 
        appropriate, in an amount equal to the amount by which the 
        values of the land differ.''.

    Approved November 9, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1778:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106-871 (Comm. on Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 106-271 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Apr. 13, considered and passed Senate.
            Oct. 23, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
No. 00-6883.

#### Ross *v.*Framingham School Committee et al.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6876

AARON LAMONT BARNES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JAMES S. GILMORE, III,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-703-AM)

Submitted: October 29, 1999 Decided: November 17, 1999

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron Lamont Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. Hazel Elizabeth Shaffer,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Aaron Lamont Barnes appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Barnes v. Gilmore, No. CA-98-703-AM

(E.D. Va. June 10, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
&

U S DeDartmen t Assistant Secretar y 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue . S E

- * T.^JZ^^^^y,^ ^ Washington , D C 2059 0 o f Transportatio n MA R 1 6 201 1 Offic e o f tfi e Secrefar

y o f Transportatio n 

# r)0T-os-v-m°['^~^'^3~ ~ • S J r" l 1 -;;-'i"r i Th e Honorabl e Jua n E . Hernande z Mayora l X J '>^,— i Senato r „ .^lO? , Th e Capito l J: > .:f " Sa n Juan , Puert o Ric o 0090 1 ^ Dea r Senato r Hernandez : Thank yo u for you r Februar y 2 8 lette r

regardin g assistanc e t o th e Mercedit aAirport unde r th e Essential Ai r

Service (EAS ) program . A s yo u probabl y know . Ponc e ha s formall y appeale dth e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportation' s decisio n to rel y o n JetBlue' s subsidy-fre e servic e t o th e mainlan dandno t

to rene w Cap e Air' s EA S contract . W e ar e currentl y evaluatin g th e merit s o f th e community' s appeal . A s i s norma l practice , w e ar e placin g acop y o f you r lette r an dthis respons e i n th e Docket , whic h i s availabl e for publi c viewin g a

t www.reKulations.go v b y enterin g DOT-OST-1999-659 2 i n th e searc h field. I f I can provid e furthe r

informatio n o r

assistance , pleas e feel free t o cal l me . Sincerel y yours ,

Susan L . Kurlan d Assistan t Secretar y for Aviatio n an dInternationa l Affair sS I 0- 1 10308-00 9

<je^ta ^ o^^-SSu&Fio - S^cc o Februar y 28 , 201 1 Honorabl e Ra

y LaHoo d Secretar y o f Transportatio n U.S . Deparmien

t o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jersey Ave . S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Dea r Secretary : I writ e t o voic e m y concer n about th e terminatio n o f

th e subsid

y give n to th e Mercedit aAirpor t i n the Cit y o f Ponc e (PSE ) throug h the Essentia l Air Servic e Progra

m(EAS) . A s Senator

o f Puert o Ric o I suppor

t thi s airport's service s t

o th e mainlan dan

dfea r thei r imminen t termination . Merceditai s (he fastes t

wa y to connec t

wit h Ne w Yor

k andFlorid afo

r thousand s o f

Puert o Rican s i n th e souther

n coast . Th e Airpor

t help s u s a s a

n a dho c airport , but

als o help s th e touris m i n th e sout h an dcentral are ao f

th e Island . I

t i s als o essentia

l tha t schedule dair

service , includin g bot h passenge

r cargo , betwee n Ponc e an

dou r Capital , Sa

n Jua n continue . The sout h o f Puerto Ric o ha s uniqu e geographi c characteristics . The continuit y o f internationa

l air service s fro

mal l th e serviceabl e point s i n th e islan di s essentia

l to th e economi c growt

h o f the region . I urg e tha t MerceditaAirpor

t continu e i

n th e EA S platform . Sincerely ,

ma n E . Hernande z Ma

y Senato r

T H E CAPITOL . SA N JUAN . PUERT O RIC O 0090 1 TE L (787)977-310 0 FAX : C787 ) 977- 3 10 3
Exhibit 99.1


           Certification of Energy & Engine Technology Corporation
          pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Qxley Act of 2002
              regarding Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
                       quarter ended March 31, 2003
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code),
each of the undersigned officers of Energy & Engine Technology Corporation,
a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

     1.  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
         ended March 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-QSB") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
         Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.  Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial conditions and results of
         operations of the Company.


Date:  May 15, 2003				By: /s/ Willard G. McAndrew, III
							Willard G. McAndrew, III
							Chief Executive Officer


Date:  May 15, 2003				By: /s/ Roger N. Wurtele
							Roger N. Wurtele
							Chief Financial Officer
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09

- 15

- 00 349

- CR

________________

CLIFFORD SANDERS , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 305878

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 1, 2015, the Court notified the parties that our jurisdiction

was not app arent from the notice of appeal and the Court would dismiss the appeal

for want of jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for

continuing the appeal. No response has been filed.

The notice of appeal seeks to appeal the regional presiding judge’s denial of

a motion to recuse. The order is not appealable prior to conviction. See Green v.

State , 374 S.W.3d 434, 445

- 46 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012); Apolinar v. State , 8202 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Means v. State , 825 S.W.2d 260, 260

- 61

(Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 199 2, no pet.). Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for want of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________ HOLLIS HORTON

Justice

Submitted on September 29, 2015

Opinion Delivered September 30, 2015

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen , C.J., Kreger and Horton , JJ.
No. 9003.

#### Bode *v.*Werner, Admx.

.(Decided March 6, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Mr. Albert W. Bettinger,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. W. A. Hicks*and *Mr. George W. Hengst,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6361

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

CURTIS JERMAINE MALLOY, a/k/a Quest,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:10-cr-00362-BO-1; 5:13-cv-00400-BO)

Submitted: July 28, 2014 Decided: July 31, 2014

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Jermaine Malloy, Appellant Pro Se. Nathan A. Huff, Joshua 

Bryan Royster, Shailika K. Shah, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina; William Glenn Perry, OFFICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Jermaine Malloy seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Malloy has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Customer Support
  Brochures
  Details
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil