alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            2815
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2823
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               82
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        2741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2823
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   556
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       24
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   290
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    241
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                241
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       241
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.67
        

</TABLE>
#### Frank TORRES, Jr., Petitioner, v. CITY OF ORLANDO, Respondent.

No. 77-324.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 1, 1977.

John L. O’Donnell, Jr., Helliwell, Melrose & DeWolf, Orlando, for petitioner.

Joel A. Spector and Paul A. Rowell, Orlando, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari, the petitioner Frank Torres, Jr., seeks review of his conviction under an Orlando ordinance, No. 43.56-1, which incorporated Section 847.05, Florida Statutes (1975). The Florida Supreme Court has declared Section 847.05 unconstitutional. *Spears v. State,*337 So.2d 977 (Fla.1976). That decision is determinative of the issue raised here. See *Wheeler v. State,*344 So.2d 244 (Fla.1977). The second point raised by the petitioner is without merit. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted; the order of the circuit court affirming petitioner’s conviction is quashed; and the cause is remanded to the circuit court with directions to vacate the conviction of petitioner.

DOWNEY, ALDERMAN and AN-STEAD, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                                 SUBSIDIARIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              Jurisdiction in
          Name                                              which Incorporated
          ----                                              ------------------
<S>                                                         <C>
HARTMARX CORPORATION (Registrant)............................   Delaware
     Direct Route Marketing Corporation......................   New Hampshire
     Hart Schaffner & Marx...................................   New York
          American Apparel Brands, Inc.......................   New York
          National Clothing Company, Inc.....................   New York
          Winchester Clothing Company........................   Kentucky
     Hickey-Freeman Co., Inc.................................   New York
     International Women's Apparel, Inc......................   Texas
     Jaymar-Ruby, Inc. (d/b/a Trans-Apparel Group)...........   Indiana
          Anniston Sportswear Corporation....................   Indiana
               E-Town Sportswear Corporation.................   Kentucky
               Rector Sportswear Corporation.................   Arkansas
          Biltwell Company, Inc..............................   Missouri
     Men's Quality Brands, Inc...............................   New York
     M. Wile & Company, Inc. (d/b/a Intercontinental
       Branded Apparel)......................................   New York
          Intercontinental Apparel, Inc......................   Delaware
     Novapparel, Inc.........................................   Delaware
     Plaid Clothing Company, Inc.............................   Delaware
     Roberts International Corporation.......................   Illinois
          Robert Comstock Apparel, Inc.......................   Delaware
     Universal Design Group, Ltd.............................   New York
     -------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

     The names of 32 subsidiaries are omitted, as such subsidiaries, considered
in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant
subsidiary.  The Registrant owns, directly or indirectly, 100% of the voting
securities of both the named and unnamed subsidiaries, except for Robert
Comstock Apparel, Inc., which is owned 50.1% by a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Registrant.  All of the above subsidiaries (including unnamed subsidiaries) are
included in the consolidated financial statements of the Registrant and its
subsidiaries.
#### SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY v. Maurice N. WESTRIDGE, Mainline Fleets and Fast Insurance Company.

No. 61355.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1978.

In re: Maurice Westridge applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21177]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Greater Washington Investments, Inc. Notice Of Surrender Of 
License

    Notice is hereby given that Greater Washington Investments, Inc. 
(Greater Washington), 105 Thirteenth Street,Columbus, Georgia 31901, 
has surrendered its license to operate as a small business investment 
company under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended 
(the Act). Greater Washington was licensed by the Small Business 
Administration on February 9, 1960.
    Under the authority vested by the Act and pursuant to the 
Regulations promulgated thereunder, the surrender was acted on this 
date, and accordingly, all rights, privileges and franchises derived 
therefrom have been terminated.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59.11, Small 
Business Investment Companies)
Don A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 97-21177 Filed 8-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
This opinion is subject to adm inistrative correction before final disposition.

Before HOLIFIELD, STEWART, and HACKEL Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Zakarya Z. MINKARA Lance Corporal (E

- 3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 202100149

_________________________ Decided: 9 December 2021 Appeal from the United States Na vy - Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judges : Andrea C. Goode (arraignment) Derek A. Poteet (trial) Sentence adjudged 19 February 2021 by a general court

- martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton , California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone

. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : reduction to E

- 1, confinement for six months , 1 forfeiture of $800 .00 pay per month for six mont hs , and a bad

- conduct discharge. For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Daniel O. Moore , JAGC, USN

1 Appellant was credited with having served 144 days of pretrial confinement.United States v. Minkara , NMCCA No. 202100149 Opinion of the Court

2 _________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________ PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 2 T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court

2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
S. 1323

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and six

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located on Lindbald

Avenue, Girdwood, Alaska, as the ‘‘Dorothy and Connie Hibbs Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONNIE HIBBS OFFICE BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located on Lindbald Avenue, in Girdwood, Alaska, shall

be known and designated as the ‘‘Dorothy and Connie Hibbs Post

Office Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Dorothy and Connie Hibbs Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries IV, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 4, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries IV, Inc.
254 La. 514

#### STATE ex rel. Alvin ALLEN v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 49969.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 21, 1969.

In re: Alvin Allen applying for writ of habeas corpus.

The application is denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory or original jurisdiction in this matter.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Minden Bancorp,  Inc. (The "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the  Securities
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Becky T. Harrell, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                               /s/ Becky T. Harrell
                                               Name: Becky T. Harrell
                                               Title:  Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 15, 2007

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act has  been  provided  to  Minden  Bancorp,  Inc.  and will be
retained by Minden  Bancorp,  Inc. and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       26
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1377 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1377

                   For the relief of Hyang Dong Joo.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 11, 2005

   Mr. Allen introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Hyang Dong Joo.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR HYANG DONG JOO.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Hyang Dong Joo shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of that Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Hyang Dong Joo enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), Hyang 
Dong Joo shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of enactment of this 
Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Hyang Dong Joo, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of birth of 
Hyang Dong Joo under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are 
made available to natives of the country of birth of Hyang Dong Joo 
under section 202(e) of that Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### James L. BARNES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-2066.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 27, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and John H. Lipinski, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Steven R. Jacob, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL and NATHAN, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: *North v. State,*65 So.2d 77 (Fla.1952); *Crum v. State,*172 So.2d 24 (Fla.3d DCA 1965); *Wincor v. State,*212 So.2d 42 (Fla.3d DCA 1968); *Pearsall*v. *State,*215 So.2d 58 (Fla.1st DCA 1968); *Yost v. State,*243 So.2d 469 (Fla.3d DCA 1971); *Ashley v. State,*265 So.2d 685 (Fla.1972); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.390(d); Fla.Std.Jury Instr. (Crim.) 2.16.
**Exhibit 23.2****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Nos. 333-36121, 333-33073, 333-33075, 333-64541, 333-87344, and 333-127068)on Form S-8 of Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 16, 2007relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements, andthe financial statement schedule and internalcontrol over financial reporting, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc. andsubsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/  McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
#### Ida COHEN, etc., Appellant, v. HERITAGE HOUSE CONVALARIUM, a Florida Corporation and American Medical Affiliates, a Foreign Corporation, Appellees.

No. 78-19.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 7, 1978.

Kurzban & Kurzban, Miami, for appellant.

Rentz, McClellan & Haggard, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal by plaintiff is from an order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss her complaint for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter.

Appellees having confessed error and joined with appellant in urging reversal of the order appealed, we reverse and remand the cause for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1509 

To amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to add non-human primates 

to the definition of prohibited wildlife species. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27, 2005 

Mr. JEFFORDS (for himself, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. LIEBERMAN, and Mr. LAUTENBERG) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to add nonhuman primates to the definition of prohibited wildlife 

species. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Captive Primate Safety 

5 Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•S 1509 IS

1 SEC. 2. ADDITION OF NON-HUMAN PRIMATES TO THE DEFI2 NITION OF PROHIBITED WILDLIFE SPECIES. 

3 Section 2(g) of the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 

4 (16 U.S.C. 3371(g)) is amended by inserting ‘‘or any non5 human primate’’ before the period at the end. 

Æ
Aviation Army team staffs DLA exhibit at Nashville Conference
 
  By Army Maj. Alex Shimabukuro, operations officer
  Representatives from Defense Logistics Agency Aviation’s Army Customer Facing Division staffed the DLA Exhibit at the annual Army Aviation Mission Solutions Summit, April 26-28 in Nashville, Tennessee.  “The summit is the only opportunity for the entire Army Aviation community to gather in one place at one time focused solely on Army aviation issues,” said Army Maj. Alex Shimabukuro, operations officer, Army Customer Facing Division, DLA Aviation. “The venue fostered a great opportunity for DLA to enhance the agency’s image with the Army and its Aviation community.”  Shimabukuro led the Army Aviation team that attended the event. Army Aviation team members included Army Col. Mark Hirschinger, Army Chief Warrant Officer 3 Michael Jackson, Dru Anna Jackson, deputy-forward presence, DLA Aviation at Huntsville, Alabama, and Darren Crowden, DLA Information Operations at Huntsville, customer account manager.  The Army Aviation Association of America organized the summit. Attendees included industry, acquisitions and research and development representatives. Army aviation leadership and service members also attended from special operations, maintenance, logistics and training commands across active duty, Army Reserve and National Guard units.  The summit showcased a wide range of products and services related to aviation and military sectors from more than 250 exhibitors.  Army flag officers led professional development sessions emphasizing Army readiness significance as our global demands increase and soldiers’ strength through their “Army Strong” families. Additionally, the summit offered a Warriors to the Workforce Hiring Event for transitioning aviation soldiers.  Shimabukuro said more than 100 customers stopped by the DLA booth. Customer questions were primarily aviation related, but he said the team also answered questions or provided contact information for questions on industrial hardware, labelling and accessing DLA or DoD websites to track parts.  He said the most difficult questions dealt with the length of the acquisition process, in terms of timing and administrative actions, for new businesses to introduce or sell a product to DLA.  Shimabukuro said it is important for DLA to exhibit at events like this to reaffirm its commitment to the Army Aviation community and showcase the agency’s logistical capabilities and services to a varied customer base.
Order entered August 9 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 12

- 00176

- CR

JOSE RUBEN ALVARENGA, Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. 380

- 82015

- 2011



### O RDER Before Justices Moseley, Bridges, and Lang

- Miers
We withdraw our Order dated July 22, 2013.

Before the Court is appellant ’s July 8, 2013 motion for extension of time to file his motion for rehearing. We GRANT the mot ion. We ORDER appellant’s motion for rehearing filed on July 22, 2013, filed as of the date of this Order.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is also before the Court. The motion is DENIED

.

/s/ JIM MOSELEY JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries VI, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 3, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries VI, Inc.