alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 165 (Tuesday, August 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45238-45239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22627]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Department 
of Energy, Los Alamos National Laboratory

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) notice is hereby given of the 
following Advisory Committee meeting: Environmental Management Site-
Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Los Alamos National Laboratory.

DATES: Thursday, August 28, 1997: 6:30 p.m.-9:30 p.m. 7:00 p.m. to 7:30 
p.m. (public comment session).

ADDRESS: Northern New Mexico Community College Conference Room, The 
Joseph Montoya Building, Espanola, New Mexico.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carmen M. Rodriquez, Community 
Involvement and Outreach Office, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los 
Alamos, New Mexico 87544, ph: (505) 665-6770, fax: (505) 667-9710, e-
mail: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Advisory Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE and its regulators in the areas of environmental 
restoration, waste management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda: Thursday, August 28, 1997.
6:30 p.m. Call to Order and Welcome.
7:00 p.m. Public Comment.
7:30 p.m. Old Business--Current Status of the Board.
8:15 p.m. New Business--Budget for the Board.
9:30 p.m. Adjourn.

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Committee either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to 
agenda items should contact Ms. Carmen M. Rodriquez, at (505) 665-6770. 
Requests must be received 5 days prior to the meeting and reasonable 
provision will be made to include the presentation in the agenda. The 
Designated Federal Official is empowered to conduct the meeting in a 
fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of business. This 
notice is being published less than 15 days in advance of the meeting 
due to programmatic issues that needed to be resolved.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and

[[Page 45239]]

copying at the Freedom of Information Public Reading Room, 1E-190, 
Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585 
between 9:00 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday-Friday, except Federal holidays. 
Minutes will also be available by writing to Herman Le-Doux, Department 
of Energy, Los Alamos Area Office, 528 35th Street, Los Alamos, NM 
87185-5400.

    Issued at Washington, DC on August 19, 1997.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-22627 Filed 8-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00528

- CV

Russell E. WILLIAMS and Judy W. Williams,

Appellants

v.

Winfred J. WILLIAMS

, Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 111223B

Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. We

ORDER that appellants, Russell E. Williams and Judy W. Williams, be ar all costs of this appeal.

SIGNED August 20, 2014.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice
exv10wnw2



 





Exhibit 10-n-2



Schedule of Executives of the Company who are a party to a Change of Control Agreement (Three-Year
Agreement):




1. C. M. Jones



2. B. M. Abzug



3. P. E. Allen



4. J. E. Besong



5. G. R. Chadick



6. G. S. Churchill



7. R. W. Kirchenbauer



8. N. Mattai



9. J. A. Moore



10. R. K. Ortberg



11. K. L. Statler
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

TYLER SHANE VALENTINE, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 761 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 3rd day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
No. 99-1083.

#### Hull *v.*Fallon et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
#### Jesse McNEAL, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-568.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 23, 1977.

Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, Bar-tow, Douglas A. Wallace, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The only point which merits discussion is the propriety of appellant’s sentence to confinement “at hard labor.” To be imprisoned “at hard labor” is improper because no existing state statute provides for imprisonment at hard labor as a sentence for any offense. *McDonald v. State,*321 So.2d 453 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

Remanded for the purpose of striking the language “at hard labor” from the sentenc*35ing order; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

McNULTY, Acting C. J., and GRIMES and OTT, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 52 (Tuesday, March 18, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 15111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05953]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Proposed Subsequent Arrangement

AGENCY: Office of Nonproliferation and International Security, 
Department of Energy.

ACTION: Proposed subsequent arrangement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is being issued under the authority of section 
131a. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. The Department is 
providing notice of a proposed subsequent arrangement under the 
Agreement for Cooperation Concerning Civil Uses of Nuclear Energy 
Between the Government of the United States of America and the 
Government of Canada and the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful 
Uses of Nuclear Energy Between the United States of America and the 
European Atomic Energy Community.

DATES: This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than 
April 2, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Katie Strangis, Office of 
Nonproliferation and International Security, National Nuclear Security 
Administration, Department of Energy. Telephone: 202-586-8623 or email: 
Katie.Strangis@nnsa.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This subsequent arrangement concerns the 
retransfer of 171,561.2 l kg of U.S.-origin natural uranium 
hexafluoride (UF6) (67.60% U), 115,975.4 kg of which is uranium, from 
Cameco Corporation (Cameco) in Port Hope, Ontario, Canada, to Urenco, 
Ltd. (URENCO) in Capenhurst Works, Chester, United Kingdom. The 
material, which is currently located at Cameco, will be used for toll 
enrichment by URENCO at its facility in Capenhurst, United Kingdom. The 
material was originally obtained by Cameco from Power Resources Inc., 
Cameco Resources-Crowe Butte Operation, and White Mesa Mill pursuant to 
export license XSOU8798.
    In accordance with section 131a. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, 
as amended, it has been determined that this subsequent arrangement 
concerning the retransfer of nuclear material of United States origin 
will not be inimical to the common defense and security of the United 
States of America.

    Dated: February 21, 2014.

    For the Department of Energy.
Anne M. Harrington,
Deputy Administrator, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.
[FR Doc. 2014-05953 Filed 3-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1524 

To repeal the sunset on the reduction of capital gains rates for individuals 

and on the taxation of dividends of individuals at capital gain rates. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 28, 2005 

Mr. CRAPO (for himself, Mr. FRIST, Mr. LOTT, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. SMITH, 

Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. ENZI, Mr. VITTER, Mr. ENSIGN, Mr. BURR, Mr. 

TALENT, Mr. DEMINT, and Mr. SANTORUM) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To repeal the sunset on the reduction of capital gains rates 

for individuals and on the taxation of dividends of individuals at capital gain rates. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTIONS IN INDIVIDUAL CAPITAL GAINS 

4 AND DIVIDENDS TAX RATE MADE PERMA5 NENT. 

6 Section 303 of the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Rec7 onciliation Act of 2003 (relating to sunset of title) is re8 pealed. 

Æ
#### Karen Ramsey BURNS, formerly Karen Ramsey Snedaker, Appellant, v. Samuel Curry SNEDAKER, Appellee.

No. DD-359.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 30, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 4, 1977.

*598Gary R. Dunham of Carter & Dunham, Robert T. Mann, Gainesville, for appellant.

Selig I. Goldin of Goldin & Cates, Gaines-ville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The marriage of the parties was dissolved by final judgment by which custody of the child of the marriage was awarded to the mother, but that aspect of the final judgment was reversed by this court. See *Snedaker v. Snedaker,*327 So.2d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). The child’s mother, appellant sub judice, thereafter remarried and petitioned for modification and award of custody, alleging a change in circumstances. The trial judge denied the petition and awarded the husband, appellee here, attorney’s fees pursuant to Florida Statute 61.16. This appeal followed.

It is axiomatic that the orders of a trial judge reach an appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness. Our review of the record fails to reveal error.

Appellee has filed a motion for an award of attorney’s fees incident to this appeal. Allowance of attorney’s fees on appeal is governed by the same considerations as those applicable in the court from whence the appeal emanates. Although appellee has requested attorney’s fees, his motion fails to allege his need or appellant’s ability to pay. See *Johnson v. Johnson,*346 So.2d 591 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) and *Patterson v. Patterson,*348 So.2d 592 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Therefore, although appellee prevails in the appeal there is no basis for our determination as to whether or not an attorney’s fee may be properly allowed. Though it is appropriate, when we determine that an award of attorney’s fees is proper, to remand the case to the trial court for the purpose of taking evidence to determine the *amount*of the award we do not deem it appropriate, in a domestic relations matter, that the case be remanded for the trial court to determine whether or not any fee should be *allowed*for services of an attorney incident to the appeal. Accordingly, the motion for attorney’s fees is denied.

Motion denied.

BOYER, C. J., and McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.
I am DLA
 
  By DLA Public Affairs
    **My name is:**
Kyu Sok Kwak**I am:**
A supply planner for DLA Energy Pacific at Korea.**Describe your job in a sentence:**
I coordinate fuel inventory levels at 22 defense fuel support points, monitor control limits and manage Korea’s Fuel Exchange Agreement and Replacement-in-Kind program.**How long have you worked at DLA?**
I began working for U.S. Forces Korea in 1979 and then transferred to DLA in 2003.**What is your favorite thing about working for DLA?**
I love working for the same goal with fun people from different countries. They challenge me and encourage me, and they bring cookies when they visit.**What are your best memories of working here?**
I have so many good memories from DLA Energy, but my best are from overnight temporary duty trips, when we had a chance to speak with open minds and really get to know each other.**How do you make a difference?**
I make a difference by focusing on the two C’s: concentrating on things within my control and being considerate of others.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1480 Referred in House (RFH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1480

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2005

                 Referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To establish the treatment of actual rental proceeds from leases of 
  land acquired under an Act providing for loans to Indian tribes and 
                          tribal corporations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTIFICATION OF RENTAL PROCEEDS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any actual rental 
proceeds from the lease of land acquired under the first section of the 
Act entitled ``An Act to provide for loans to Indian tribes and tribal 
corporations, and for other purposes'' (25 U.S.C. 488) certified by the 
Secretary of the Interior shall be deemed--
            (1) to constitute the rental value of that land; and
            (2) to satisfy the requirement for appraisal of that land.

            Passed the Senate July 26, 2005.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### Winston H. SIMS v. Marcella McGinnis SIMS.

No. 60719.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 1977.

In re: Marcella McGinnis Sims applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 349 So.2d 974.

Writ granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 158 (Friday, August 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21674]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Fellowships Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Fellowships Advisory Panel, Literature Section (Creative Writing 
Fellowships, Literary Publishing category) to the National Council on 
the Arts will be held on September 17-19, 1997. The panel will meet 
from 9:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on September 17 and 18 and from 9:00 a.m. 
to 5:00 p.m. on September 19 in Room M-07 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506. A portion of this 
meeting, from 9:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on September 19, will be open to 
the public for a policy and guidelines discussion.
    The remaining portions of this meeting, from 9:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. 
on September 17 and 18 and from 10:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on September 
19, are for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and 
recommendation on applications for financial assistance under the 
National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as 
amended, including information given in confidence to the agency by 
grant applicants. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman 
of March 31, 1997, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant 
to subsection (c) (4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, 
United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and may be permitted to 
participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion of the panel 
chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal employee in 
attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, 202/682-5532, TDY-
TDD 202/682-5496 at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or call 202/682-5691.

    Dated: August 12, 1997.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 97-21674 Filed 8-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
EXHIBIT 32





<PAGE>



      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Epic Capital Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Rex Doyle, the Chief
Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


                                        EPIC CAPITAL GROUP, INC.


November 13, 2006                       /s/ Rex Doyle
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Rex Doyle, Chief Executive and Principal
                                        Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
    Parent Company                       Subsidiary Company                  State of Incorporation
    --------------                       ------------------                  ----------------------
<S>                               <C>                                               <C>
 Oneida Financial Corp                 The Oneida Savings Bank                      New York

The Oneida Savings Bank            Oneida Preferred Funding Corp.                   New York

The Oneida Savings Bank           Bailey & Haskell Associates, Inc.                 New York

The Oneida Savings Bank             The State Bank of Chittenango                   New York

The Oneida Savings Bank            Workplace Health Solutions Inc.                  New York

The Oneida Savings Bank             Benefit Consulting Group Inc.                   New York
</TABLE>
No. 99M68.

#### Eljack *v.*Hammound.

Motion to direct the Clerk to file petition for writ of certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32



<PAGE>



     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Epic Energy Resources Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  Rex  Doyle,  the  Chief
Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


                                          EPIC ENERGY RESOURCES INC.


May 11, 2007                              /s/ Rex Doyle
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Rex Doyle, Chief Executive and
                                          Principal Financial Officer
No. 00-6962.

#### Dyer *v.*Carlton, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of MFIC Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Dennis P. Riordan, the Controller of the Company, hereby certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                            | /s/ DENNIS P. RIORDAN |
|----------------------------|-----------------------|
|                       | Dennis P. Riordan     |
|                       | Controller            |
| Date: March 28,  2007 |                  |

 

----
# DLA Aviation Qualified Supplier List (QSL) Discontinued Feb. 2023

###             Updated: March 27, 2024        

DLA Aviation has **discontinued the Qualified Suppliers List (QSL) program effective February 20, 2023**, for manufacturers and distributors of the following commodities:
      - Class 2 Threaded Fasteners (FSC 5305, 5306, 5307, and 5310)
      - Class 3 Threaded Fasteners (FSC 5305, 5306, 5307, and 5310)
      - Quick Release Pins (FSC 5315)
      - Rivets (FSC 5320)

** Submitting a Source Approval Request (SAR) is the current process to becoming an approved source. For more information see, the Vendor Resources, SAR tab.            

** QSL Vendors due for reapplication or audit **did remain in good standing** through the program closure date of February 20, 2023.

** As of February 20, 2023, no new QSL Vendor applications will be accepted and no audits for existing QSL vendors will be initiated.        

All existing contract awards and solicitations containing the following STOs will remain valid:
- IS072
- IS054
- IS097
- IS098
- IS086

QSL requirements associated with the above Standard Text Objects (STOs) apply unless otherwise waived in writing by the contracting officer.

Notwithstanding with these changes, suppliers are reminded that in accordance with DLA Directive (DLAD) Procurement Note C03, Contractor Retention of Supply Chain Traceability Documentation, suppliers must still provide traceability documentation before award upon request and must retain traceability documentation for 6 years (10 years for Critical Safety Items) following final payment.

How To Access DLAD Procurement Note C03- Open  Procurement Policy and Directives  Page.
- Scroll down the page to DLA Directive (DLAD) Procurement Notes.
- Select the DLA Directive (DLAD) Procurement Notes link to newest version.
- Search the code in the document by selecting shortcut keys Ctrl + F on keyboard.
- When search box appears, type in the C03 code and press enter key on keyboard.
- Review DLAD Procurement Note C03 requirement or description.
Contact Information
Any questions regarding this matter can be addressed to AviationQSL@dla.mil.
Terms Glossary
Find meanings for acronyms, abbreviations, and codes used throughout the process article below in the table:
Term UsedMeaning/DefinitionDLADDLA DirectiveQSLQualified Supplier ListSARSource Approval RequestSTOStandard Text Object

**Submit Vendor Information Hub Site Suggestions and Feedback****