alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-30961 Summary Calendar RONALD MARSHALL Petitioner-Appellant

v. BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY Respondent-Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:04-CV-219
Before KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ronald Marshall, Louisiana prisoner # 336016, appealsfrom the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging his armed robbery conviction. The district court granted Marshall a certificate of appealability (COA) on the following issues: whether counsel was ineffective for (1) allowing the jury to hear Detective Calvin Brazley’s hearsay testimony regarding the substance of
an anonymoustip; (2) failing toinvestigate, i nterview, and secure witnesses; and (3) failing to investigate and find impeachment evidence.No. 06-30961

2 Marshall’s brief is devoid ofdiscussion ofthe issues on which the district court granted him a COA. Marshall alleges that he is unable to address the merits of his ineffective assistance claims because he was required to leave behind his legal materials when he was evacuated from the Orleans Parish Prison during Hurricane Katrina. The record discloses, however, that despite the unavailability of his legal materials, Marshall nevertheless sufficiently objected to the magistrate judge’s recommendation concerning the three ineffective assistance issues on w hich he was ultimately granted a COA. The record further discloses that Marshall’s request for a free copy ofthe record was granted by the district court. Marshall did not wait for this court to rule on his request for a free copy ofthe record before asking that a pleading devoid ofdiscussion ofthe ineffective assistance issues be filed as his merits brief. Based on the preceding, we hold that his failure to brief the issues on which COA was granted renders them abandoned. Hughes v. Johnson, 191 F.3d 607, 613 (5th Cir. 1999). AFFIRMED.
#### Dale KELLY v. STATE.

No. 37844.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only 
Information Only
1 COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JAMES LEE HELTON

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00 2 88

- C R

Appeal from the

120 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20110D03238 )

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is a motion filed by Appellant to allow his counsel to review

certain sealed records in order that he may render effective assistance of counsel on appeal. The

Court will treat this as a motion to supplement the appellate record w ith the following orders and

items which have been sealed by these orders of the trial court:

1/19/12 Order for Psychiatric Exam;

1/23/12 Order Sealing Records;

1/24/12 Order Sealing Records;

2/1/12 Order Sealing Record;

2/3/12 Order Sealing Record;

2/2 3/12 Order Sealing Record; and

3/9/12 Competency Hearing.

Appellant asserts he has made multiple requests to the trial court clerk that the record be

supplemented with these items (the orders and the items sealed by those orders) but the trial

court clerk has not filed a sealed supplemental record with this Court. See T EX .R.A PP .P.

34.5(c)(1)(permitting the trial court, the appellate court, or any party to direct the trial court clerk2

to prepare, certify, and file in the appellate court a supplement contain ing any relevant item from

the clerk’s record). The motion to supplement the appellate record with the foregoing orders and

sealed items is GRANTED. We therefore ORDER the trial court clerk to prepare a sealed

supplemental record containing the orders an d sealed items listed above and file it with this

Court no later than March 6, 2014. The sealed record will not be made available to the public

and will be available only for the use of the attorneys representing the parties to this appeal.

Rule 9.10(f) (A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper form or

electronic form, without redaction.)

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 9 th day of February , 20 1 4

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez , JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44974]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22554]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 91F-0032]


Th. Goldschmidt A.G.; Withdrawal of Food Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
withdrawal, without prejudice to a future filing, of a food additive 
petition (FAP 1B4244) proposing that the food additive regulations be 
amended to provide for the safe use of silicone acrylate resins in 
coatings for metal substrates, polyolefin films, and paper and 
paperboard intended for use in contact with food.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julius Smith, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-215), Food and Drug Administration, 200 C 
St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3091.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a notice published in the Federal 
Register of March 4, 1991 (56 FR 9012), FDA announced that a food 
additive petition (FAP 1B4244) had been filed by Th. Goldschmidt A.G. 
(currently c/o Keller and Heckman, 1001 G St. NW., suite 500 West, 
Washington, DC 20001). The petition proposed to amend the food additive 
regulations to provide for the safe use of silicone acrylate resins for 
use in coatings for metal substrates, polyolefin films, and paper and 
paperboard intended for use in contact with food. Th. Goldschmidt A.G. 
has now withdrawn the petition without prejudice to a future filing (21 
CFR 171.7).

    Dated: August 7, 1997.
Alan M. Rulis,
Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety and 
Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 97-22554 Filed 8-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
Joint Petroleum Seminar focuses on relationships, future leaders
 
  By Ron Inman, DLA Energy Public Affairs
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**KARL CHESTER,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 168 EAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 16th day of August, 2016, the Petition for Al lowance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration o r decision of this matter.**
# 2018 Rochester Institute of Technology Spring Career Fair

/ Published Feb. 13, 2018
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Two Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime recruiters participated in the 2018 Rochester Institute of Technology Spring Career Fair, in Rochester, New York, Feb. 6, 2018. 

This event provided DLA an opportunity to interact and speak with students from the Rochester area.  The focus of this career fair was to inform students, especially those who are deaf or hard of hearing about career opportunities within DLA and other Government entities.

The goal was to attract and acquire a diversified workforce.  The assistant director of the National Technical Institute for the Deaf (NTID) Center on Employment was contacted prior to the Spring Career Fair providing information about the DLA Booth. She requested the career advisors to share the information with the deaf/hard of hearing students and encouraged them to visit the booth.  The added incentive was that DLA deaf employees would be doing the recruiting. 

Many of deaf/hard of hearing students had heard about the booth from their advisor and met with the recruiters.  They were amazed with the recruiters’ experiences because both were RIT Alumni. This provided incentive that there are good jobs working in the federal government as deaf/hard of hearing employees that they can get a job and be successful at DLA Land and Maritime. 

Many of those in attendance were interested in the Workforce Recruitment Program and how they can apply for it.  Approximately 100 attendees visited the booth.
No. 00-6939.

#### Spencer *v.*Casterline, Warden.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-7027.

#### Woods *v.*Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama; and Woods *v.*Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 99-7910.

#### Turner *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21417]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION


Budget Concepts Branch; Cancellation of Standard Form

AGENCY: Office of Management and Budget.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following Standard Form is cancelled: SF 132, 
Apportionment and Reapportionment Schedule. This form is replaced by a 
format prescribed in OMB Circular A-34.

DATES: Effective August 13, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Betty Ing Bradshaw, Office of Management and Budget, (202) 395-
3146.

    Dated: July 24, 1997.
Barbara M. Williams,
Deputy Standard and Optional Forms Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-21417 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-M
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 50146 Conference Calendar

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Jorge Antonio Casio**

**- Caro,** 
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:19

- CR

- 3631

- 1

Before **Smith, Stewart,** and **Higginson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Antonio Casio

- Caro has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Casio

- Caro has not filed a response.

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 20, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-50146 Document: 00515829257 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2021No. 20

- 50146

2 We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for app ellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See
**5 th**  **C ir**  **. R.** 42. Case: 20-50146 Document: 00515829257 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2021
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Troop Support commander sizes up recruits at Lackland AFB

By Michael TuttleDLA Troop Support Public Affairs

                LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE, Texas  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Lackland AFBrecruitsuniformsDLA Troop Support
# C_2013225EN.01005905.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/59

---

Order of the President of the Court of 28 May 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim — Germany) — Markus Weiss v Condor Flugdienst GmbH

(Case C-68/13) (1)

1

2013/C 225/131

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 114, 20.4.2013.

1

---
# Rivera takes command at DLA Distribution Yokosuka, Japan

/ Published March 2, 2018
YOKOSUKA, Japan, Navy Cmdr. AJ Rivera assumed command of Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Yokosuka, Japan, in a March 2 ceremony.  The ceremony was officiated by DLA Pacific commander Navy Capt. Timothy Daniels.
A Pennsylvania native, Rivera graduated from University of Pittsburgh with distinction on a full academic scholarship.  He received his commission from Carnegie Mellon University Navy Reserve Officer Training Corps program in 1999.  He earned a Master of Science in business administration from San Diego State University in 2005 and a Master of Science in operations research from Naval Postgraduate School in 2009.

Rivera’s supply corps sea duty assignments include tours on USS Cleveland (LPD 7) and USS John F. Kennedy (CV 67).  He had the honor to be a member of the decommissioning crew onboard CV-67.

Additionally, Rivera’s ashore assignments include material control officer, Sea Control Squadron (VS 41); readiness officer, Aviation Support Division; wing supply officer, COMSEACONWINGPAC; operations research analyst – POM, OPNAV N81 Assessment Division; spares policy and supply services officer, U.S. Fleet Forces Command N41; performance and analysis branch head, NAVSUP Headquarters N52; and director of operations research and analysis, NAVSUP Weapon Systems Support N61. 

Rivera completed a Navy GWOT Support Assignment (GSA) as J8 Commander’s Emergency Response Program (CERP) operations chief, U.S. Forces Afghanistan (USFOR-A), Kabul, Afghanistan.

Most recently, Rivera served as Director of Operations Research and Analysis at NAVSUP Weapons System Support in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania.

Personal awards include a Meritorious Service Medal, Joint Commendation Medal, three Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medals, two Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medals, and various unit and campaign commendations.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 163 (Friday, August 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22297]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Receipt of Petition for Federal Acknowledgment of Existence as an 
Indian Tribe

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This is published in the exercise of authority delegated by the 
Secretary of the Interior to the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs by 
209 DM 8.
    Pursuant to 25 CFR 83.9(a) notice is hereby given that the Chilkoot 
Kaagwaantaan Clan, P.O. Box 275, Haines, Alaska 99827 has filed a 
petition for acknowledgment by the Secretary of the Interior that the 
group exists as an Indian tribe. The petition was received by the 
Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) on April 22, 1997, and was signed by 
members of the group's governing body.
    This is a notice of receipt of petition and does not constitute 
notice that the petition is under active consideration. Notice of 
active consideration will be sent by mail to the petitioner and 
interested parties at the appropriate time.
    Under Section 83.9(a) of the Federal regulations, parties may 
submit factual and/or legal arguments in support of or in opposition to 
the group's petition. Any information submitted will be made available 
on the same basis as other information in the BIA's files. Third 
parties are required to submit copies of their comments directly to the 
petitioner. The petitioner will be provided an opportunity to respond 
to such submissions prior to a final determination regarding the 
petitioner's status.
    The petition may be examined, by appointment, in the Department of 
the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Branch of Acknowledgment and 
Research, Room 3427-MIB, 1849 C Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240, 
Phone: (202) 208-3592.

    Dated: July 31, 1997.
Hilda Manuel,
Deputy Commissioner of Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 97-22297 Filed 8-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-108-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

h1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

145652

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145652

COA: 308675

Mason CC: 97

- 013250

- FC

JASON CARL WALLAGER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 13, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
PRIVATE LAW 106–17—NOV. 22, 2000

Private Law 106–17

106th Congress

An Act

For the relief of Frances Schochenmaier and Mary Hudson.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELIEF OF FRANCES SCHOCHENMAIER.

The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any moneys

in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Frances

Schochenmaier of Bonesteel, South Dakota, the sum of $60,567.58

in compensation for the erroneous underpayment to Herman

Schochenmaier, husband of Frances Schochenmaier, during the

period from September 1945 to March 1995, of compensation and

other benefits relating to a service-connected disability incurred

by Herman Schochenmaier during military service in World War

II.

SEC. 2. RELIEF OF MARY HUDSON.

Notwithstanding section 5121(a) of title 38, United States Code,

or any other provision of law, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs

shall not recover from the estate of Wallace Hudson, formerly

of Russellville, Alabama, or from Mary Hudson, the surviving

spouse of Wallace Hudson, the sum of $97,253 paid to Wallace

Hudson for compensation and other benefits relating to a serviceconnected disability incurred by Wallace Hudson during active military service in World War II, which payment was mailed by the

Secretary to Wallace Hudson in January 2000 but was delivered

after Wallace Hudson’s death.

Nov. 22, 2000

[S. 785]

PRIVATE LAW 106–17—NOV. 22, 2000

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON FEES.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not more than a total of 10 percent of the

payment required by section 1 or retained under section 2 may

be paid to or received by agents or attorneys for services rendered

in connection with obtaining or retaining such payment, as the

case may be, any contract to the contrary notwithstanding.

(b) VIOLATION.—Any person who violates subsection (a) shall

be fined not more than $1,000.

Approved November 22, 2000.
# Red River hosts annual Employee Appreciation Day

/ Published Dec. 15, 2017
TEXARKANA, Texas, DLA Distribution Red River, Texas, held their annual Employee Appreciation Day on Nov. 17.  
The day consisted of a catered holiday meal of smoked turkey, ham and “all the fixins,’”according to Red River commander Army Lt. Col. Jeffery Chamberlain.  The day also served as observances for Hispanic Americans, individuals with disabilities, and Native American Heritage.

Red River employee’s participated in an array of gaming activities and prize giveaways.   Competitions included archery, a braille station, a sign language station, Hispanic food tasting and a Native American trivia contest.  
 As the day’s activities came to a close Chamberlain expressed his gratitude to the Red River family for “their tireless dedication to service and sacrifice for supporting America’s Warfighters.”