alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1578 

To reauthorize the Upper Colorado and San Juan River Basin endangered 

fish recovery implementation programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 29, 2005 

Mr. ALLARD (for himself, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. HATCH, and Mr. SALAZAR) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Upper Colorado and San Juan River 

Basin endangered fish recovery implementation programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Upper Colorado and 

5 San Juan River Basin Endangered Fish Recovery Pro6 grams Reauthorization Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•S 1578 IS

1 SEC. 2. UPPER COLORADO AND SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN EN2 DANGERED FISH RECOVERY IMPLEMENTA3 TION PROGRAMS. 

4 Section 3 of Public Law 106–392 (114 Stat. 1602; 

5 116 Stat. 3113) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a)— 

7 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking 

8 ‘‘$46,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$61,000,000’’; 

9 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘2008’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘2010’’; and 

11 (C) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘2008’’ 

12 and inserting ‘‘2010’’; 

13 (2) in subsection (b)— 

14 (A) by striking ‘‘$100,000,000’’ and in15 serting ‘‘$126,000,000’’; 

16 (B) in paragraph (1)— 

17 (i) by striking $82,000,000’’ and in18 serting ‘‘$108,000,000’’; and 

19 (ii) by striking ‘‘2008’’ and inserting 

20 ‘‘2010’’; and 

21 (C) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘2008’’ 

22 and inserting ‘‘2010’’; and 

23 (3) in subsection (c)(4)— 

24 (A) in the first sentence, by inserting ‘‘and 

25 the Elkhead Reservoir enlargement’’ after 

26 ‘‘Wolford Mountain Reservoir’’; and 
3 

•S 1578 IS

1 (B) in the second sentence, by striking 

2 ‘‘$20,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$31,000,000’’. 

Æ
No. 00-6978.

#### Locklair *v.*South Carolina.

Sup. Ct. S. C. Certiorari denied.
MIRANDA GOLD CORP.

Unit 1  15782 Marine Drive

White Rock, B.C. V4B 1E6



Tel:  (604) 536-2711

Fax: (604) 536-2788





Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Miranda Gold Corp. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Kenneth D. Cunningham, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of her knowledge, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:

January 23, 2008





signed Kenneth D. Cunningham

____________________________________________________

Kenneth D. Cunningham, President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00384-CR

Alicia Elizabeth Ford

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 3

of Tarrant County (1405276)

February 25, 2016

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
#### Sydney LEVINE, Appellant, v. Rachel D. LEVINE, Appellee. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Rachel D. LEVINE, Appellee.

Nos. 77-1085, 77-2129.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 13, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 5, 1978.

Eleanor Levingston Schockett, Miami, for Sydney Levine; Shutts & Bowen and William J. Kendrick, Miami, for Provident Life, appellants.

Burton D. Greenfield, Miami, for appel-lee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and HUBBART and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *City of Miami*v. *Spurrier,*320 So.2d 397 (Fla.3d DCA 1975).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 165 (Tuesday, August 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22650]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory Commission; Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770, 5 U.S.C. App 1, section 
10), that a meeting of the Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory 
Commission will be held on Friday, September 19, 1997.
    The Commission was reestablished pursuant to Public Law 99-349, 
Amendment 24. The purpose of the Commission is to consult with the 
Secretary of the Interior, or his designee, with respect to matters 
relating to the development of the Cape Cod National Seashore, and with 
respect to carrying out the provisions of sections 4 and 5 of the Act 
establishing the Seashore.
    The Commission members will convene at Headquarters, Marconi 
Station at 1 p.m. for the regular business meeting which will be held 
for the following reasons:

1. Adoption of Agenda
2. Approval of Minutes of Previous Meetings March 28, 1997 and May 9, 
1997
3. Reports of Officers
4. Reports of Subcommittee
    Nickerson Fellowship
5. Superintendent's Report
    Summer '97
    New Staff
    GMP
    ORV
    Proposed burn at Fort Hill
    News from Washington
6. Old Business
    Dune Shack Report
    Use and Occupancy Report
    Advisory Commission Handbook
7. New Business
8. Agenda for next meeting
9. Date for next meeting
10. Public comment
11. Adjournment

    The meeting is open to the public. It is expected that 15 persons 
will be able to attend the meeting in addition to the Commission 
members.
    Interested persons may make oral/written presentations to the 
Commission during the business meeting or file written statements. Such 
requests should be made to the park superintendent at least seven days 
prior to the meeting. Further information concerning the meeting may be 
obtained from the Superintendent, Cape Cod National Seashore, 99 
Marconi Site Road, Wellfleet, MA 02667.
Maria Burks,
Superintendent.
[FR Doc. 97-22650 Filed 8-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 158 (Friday, August 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43691]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21846]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 158 / Friday, August 15, 1997 / 
Notices

[[Page 43691]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

HARRY S. TRUMAN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Annual Meeting of the Trustees and Officers 
of the Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation

4:00-5:30 p.m., September 24, 1997, Room HC 6, The United States 
Capitol
1. Call to Order and Welcome, Vice Chairman Skelton
2. Introduction of Trustees attending their first Annual Meeting
3. Approval of the Minutes of the 1996 Annual Meeting
4. Proposal for a partnership with a consortium of institutions to 
increase participation of Historically Black Colleges and Universities 
in the Truman Scholarship program
5. Proposal to fund an experimental Truman Scholars Alumni Program for 
1997-98
6. Proposal to provide one-week Truman Scholar internships with 
Foundation Trustees
7. Foundation participation in the commissioning ceremony of the USS 
Harry S. Truman
8. Introduction of Truman Scholars working in the Washington area
9. Executive Secretary's Report including
    <bullet> Leadership at the Foundation
    <bullet> Expenditures for FY 1997
    <bullet> Status of the Trust Fund
    <bullet> Overview of the 1997 Truman Scholars Selection
    <bullet> Plans for the 1998 Truman competition
    <bullet> Truman Foundation Honor Institution awards
    <bullet> Report on the workshop Success with the Truman
10. Proposal to commission an audit of the Fiscal Year 1997 operations 
of the Foundation
11. New Business
12. Adjournment

[FR Doc. 97-21846 Filed 8-13-97; 3:57 pm]
BILLING CODE 4738-10-M
No. 00-5976.

#### Bell *v.*Reno, Attorney General.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
[4910-13-PJ

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

N(:URRENCE~

ROUTlNGSYMIIOL

Federal Aviation Administration II(P-V.U.

ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); reopening ofcomm nt -

7-tlz~/dj

mNGSYMil(l\.

11(.-«. B.

(DOT).

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

RlN 2120-AA64

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0003; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM·251-AD]

A340-2oo, -300, -500 and -600 Series Airplanes

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-200 and -300 Series Airplanes, and

14 CFR Part 39

period. C .G-<..v--

r:'f- - ID

SUMMARY; We are revising an earlier NPRM for the products listed above. This acti / o'!5f to

O\ll1N\iSYfL

revises the earlier NPRM by expanding the scope. This AD results from mandatory - 11l(l

continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of

another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The lITlNGS","OOl

MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

Several cases of corrosion and damage on the Down Drive Shafts (DDS),

between the Down Drive Gear Box (DDGB) and the Input Gear Box

(!pGB), on all 10 Flap Tracks (5 per wing), have been reported by

AIRBUS Long Range Operators.

Investigations have revealed that corrosion and wear due to absence of

grease in the spline interfaces could cause [DDS] discOImection which

could result in a free movable flap surface. potentially leading to aircraft

asymmetry or even flap detachment.

* * * * * * *
# Troop Support celebrates Army’s 242nd birthday

/ Published June 14, 2017
PHILADELPHIA, 

Preparations to celebrate the Army’s 242nd birthday began early for the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support.

While cake was cut one day before the service’s June 14 birthday at DLA Troop Support’s Philadelphia headquarters, the Subsistence supply chain began the work to help deliver Army birthday cakes to 194 dining facilities around the world much earlier.

Approximately 300,000 servings of cake will be consumed for the celebration, according to the Army’s Joint Culinary Center of Excellence officials at Fort Lee, Virginia. 

The cakes even landed in Lithuania where soldiers with the 1st Sustainment Brigade celebrated the Army birthday while participating in Operation Saber Strike 17, a multinational, U.S. Army Europe-led exercise designed to enhance interoperability among Allies and regional partners.

The Army history website has more information about how colonial forces were reorganized into the Continental Army in 1775.
# DLA Energy team fuels Hurricane Harvey rescue, relief efforts

/ Published Sept. 1, 2017
FORT HOOD, Texas, 
DLA Energy Americas and Task Force Americas are providing fuel and energy support to recovery efforts in southeast Texas following Hurricane Harvey and its aftermath.

As of Aug. 31, DLA Energy had delivered 11 generators to the Federal Emergency Management Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and 100,000 gallons of gasoline and 493,000 gallons of diesel fuel to Fort Hood and FEMA’s incident support base in Seguin, Texas. TFA also staged 160 fuel trucks filled with diesel fuel and gasoline at Hood Army Airfield as a FEMA fuel staging area in support of disaster relief.

“From a DLA Energy perspective, the rescue/relief efforts in southeast Texas have gone exceptionally well,” said DLA Energy Americas Commander Army Col. Craig Simonsgaard. “(DLA Energy Americas East at Houston Commander) Lt. Col. (Josielyn) Carrasquillo and the TFA team that she leads deployed to Fort Hood on Friday before the storm hit Texas and set the conditions for the arrival of Foster Fuels, FEMA’s contingency fuels contractor. 

“TFA has been proactive and aggressive in getting fuel missions pushed out of Fort Hood and into the affected areas to provide ground fuel support to first responders,” Simonsgaard said. “Foster Fuels are true professionals and handle every mission thrown their way with a ‘Warfighter First’ mentality.”

Simonsgaard also recognized the rest of the Americas East team. 

“Americas East sent their deputy director, Tracy Keenan, to lead their Emergency Relocation Group to Fort Hood and those nine people have been handling all the short notice – really, no-notice – fuel missions that DLA is expected to perform under difficult circumstances,” Simonsgaard said. “Our normal jet fuel provider in Houston was offline, so in less than 24 hours, the ERG coordinated commercial trucks to pick up jet fuel at Dyess Air Force Base, move it to the outskirts of Houston, link those trucks up with local law enforcement and get the fuel to Ellington Field in the heart of a devastated Houston.”

He explained that Ellington Field is the main hub for U.S. Coast Guard search and rescue (SAR) operations in Houston. 

“SAR is still U.S. Northern Command’s highest priority and, as you can see in the news, helicopters are working around the clock pulling people off the roofs of houses,” he said. “I just saw video of a woman holding a tiny baby being hoisted in a small basket up into a Coast Guard helicopter ... unbelievable. That fuel mission ensured that those helicopters kept flying the next day to save more people. 

“I am exceptionally proud of Americas East and TFA,” Simonsgaard said. “They have been proactive, agile and responsive while also maintaining very high morale while separated from their families and wondering about the status of their homes back in Houston.”
#### Willie B. TUCKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-374.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 13, 1969.

Willie B. Tucker, in pro per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and J. Terrell Williams, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

*58PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Smith v. State, Fla.App.1965, 180 So.2d 675; Kirkland v. State, Fla.App.1964, 165 So.2d 774; Marti v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 163 So.2d 506; Childs v. State, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 605; Amaral v. State, Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 549; Ford v. State, Fla.App.1968, 210 So.2d 33, and Manning v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 203 So.2d 360.

CROSS, C. J., and REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.2 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, John W. Peters, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Suncrest Global Energy Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 9, 2006 /s/ John W. Peters John W. Peters,Principal Financial Officer
No. 9160.

#### Gardner et al., Partners, *v.*Miller.

(Decided March 27, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Seneca county.

*Mr. Jesse .Stephens*and *Mr. S. S.*Wheeler,, for plaintiffs in error.'

*Mr. C. L. Guernsey,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### KNOWLES ANIMAL HOSPITAL, INC., Appellant, v. Helen WILLS and Howard Wills, her husband, Appellees. Helen WILLS and Howard Wills, her husband, Appellants, v. Dr. Robert KNOWLES, Appellee.

Nos. 77-1758, 77-1754.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 13, 1978.

Rehearing Denied July 14, 1978.

*38Goldstein & Goldstein and Caron Balka-ny, Miami, for Wills.

Corlett, Merritt, Killian & Sikes, Greene & Cooper and Sharon L. Wolfe, Miami, for Knowles.

Before HENDRY and HUBBART, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.) Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Helen Wills and Howard Wills filed an action against Knowles Animal Hospital, Inc., and Dr. Robert Knowles for injury to plaintiffs’ dog, and for consequent physical and mental pain and suffering caused thereby to plaintiffs. It was alleged that the defendants were guilty of gross negligence resulting in a severe burn and disfigurement being inflicted on the dog. Plaintiffs sought compensatory and punitive damages. Jury trial resulted in favor of the defendant, Dr. Knowles, and a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiffs against defendant Hospital corporation for $13,000.00 made up of awards of $1,000.00 and $12,000.00.

The defendant Hospital appealed (No. 77-1758) and plaintiffs appealed from the judgment in favor of Dr. Knowles (No. 77-1754). We affirm the judgments appealed from.

Following an operation on the dog, it was placed on a heating pad in a cage and permitted to remain thereon in the hospital for a day and the better part of a second day with an absence of care or attention. Severe burn on one side of the dog was the result. The plaintiffs’ claim of physical and mental suffering which followed was sustained in the evidence. Thereafter, elsewhere, the dog underwent treatment, and partly because of the effect of that injury to the dog and because of another unrelated adverse condition which developed, the dog subsequently was required to be put away. On authority of *Kirksey*v. *Jernigan,*45 So.2d 188 (Fla.1950), and *LaPorte v. Associated Independents, Inc.,*163 So.2d 267 (Fla.1964), we hold that the court did not commit err by including for consideration of the jury the element of the mental pain and suffering of the plaintiff-owners of the dog. Additionally, on the evidence the jury could, and no doubt did view the neglectful conduct which resulted in the burn injury suffered by the dog to have been of a character amounting to great indifference to the property of the *39plaintiffs, such as to justify the jury award. See: *Levine v. Knowles,*197 So.2d 329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967); *Levine v. Knowles,*218 So.2d 217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); *Levine v. Knowles,*228 So.2d 308 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969).

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22536]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33362]


Paducah & Louisville Railway, Inc.--Control Exemption--Paducah & 
Illinois Railroad Company

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board grants Paducah & Louisville Railway, Inc.'s (P&L) 
motion to dismiss its petition for exemption to control Paducah & 
Illinois Railroad Company (P&I) and, on the Board's own motion, exempts 
P&L from the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323(a)(6) for 
P&L's joint ownership of a one-third interest in P&I, subject to the 
labor protection requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11326(b).

DATES: The exemption will be effective on September 9, 1997. Petitions 
to stay must be filed by September 4, 1997 and petitions to reopen must 
be filed by September 19, 1997.

ADDRESSES: An original and 10 copies of all pleadings referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33362 must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington DC 20423-0001; in addition a copy of all pleadings must be 
served on petitioner's representative: William A. Mullins, Troutman 
Sanders LLP, 1300 I St., N.W., Suite 500 East, Washington, DC 20005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beryl Gordon, (202) 565-1600. [TDD for 
the hearing impaired: (202) 565-1695.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, 
call or pick up in person from: DC News & Data, Inc., 1925 K Street, 
N.W., Suite 210, Washington, DC 20006. Telephone: (202) 289-4357. 
(Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through TDD services 
(202) 565-1695.)

    Decided: August 12, 1997.
    By the Board, Chairman Morgan and Vice Chairman Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22536 Filed 8-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P