alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This successive appeal has been submitted to the original panel under Operating Procedure * 6(b). After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Cir.R. 34(f). 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Submitted October 4, 2010 * Decided November 1, 2010 Before RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge No. 10-2341 U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA , Plaintiff-Appellee ,

v. R OBERT R OLLINS , Defendant-Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of I llinois, Eastern Division. No. 99 CR 771 William J. Hibbler, Judge

. O R D E R On December 15, 2009, the defendant filed in the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois what is styled a “Motion to Dismiss Counts One through Eight of the Indictment Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of the FRCP and Affidavit in Support.” On April 6, 2010, he filed a “Post-Trial Motion to Dismiss” the conviction or the indictment for lack of jurisdiction. Both motions were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and both of these rulings are now challenged on appeal. 

### NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 10-2341 Page 2 Both of the defendant’s motions challenge the jurisdiction of the district court over the defendant and seek the vacation of the conviction and the reduction of his sentence. These claims fall squarely within the ambit of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(a), and should be construed as § 2255 motions. The government in its argument here has incorrectly identified the filing deadline for the defendant’s appeal. It is true that the deadline for f iling an appeal from the denial of habeas corpus relief is governed by F ED . R. A PP . P. 4(a), which prescribes a default filing deadline of thirty days in civil cases. F ED . R. A PP . P. 4(a)(1)(A). But where the United States is a party to a civil case the applicable deadline is sixty days. F ED . R. A PP . P. 4(a)(1)(B). Therefore, an appeal from the denial of a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, in which the United States is a party, enjoys a sixty day deadline. See Edwards v. United States , 266 F.3d 756, 757 (7th Cir. 2001). Here, the district court entered its final judgment denying the defendant’s April 6 motion on April 14, 2010, and the defendant filed this appeal approximately fifty days later on June 2, 2010. Given our determination to construe the defendant’s motions as having been made pursuant to § 2255, the appeal was not untimely. Nevertheless, this appeal must be dismissed. The defendant has already filed a § 2255 motion which was denied on November 20, 2006. The defendant’s present motions are therefore successive motions for relief under § 2255. The defendant has not obtained the necessary authorization, pursuant §§ 2255(h) and 2244, to file successive motions. For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is DISMISSED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1469 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1469

        To suspend temporarily the duty on Desmodur BL XP 2468.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 22, 2005

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on Desmodur BL XP 2468.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESMODUR BL XP 2468.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.70      Copolymer of        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         methyl ethyl                                                       31/2009
                         ketoxime and
                         toluenediisocyana
                         te (CAS No.
                         352462-03-4)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3911.90.45)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1


  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Big Sky Industries I,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the quarter  ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Ramon
Chimelis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


    Date: August 22, 2007                           /s/Ramon Chimelis
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Ramon Chimelis
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
# MWR holds first Bellwood Bash at DSCR 

/ Published May 22, 2017
Richmond, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency Installation Support at Richmond’s Morale Welfare and Recreation Office held the first Bellwood Bash Family and Friends Day Celebration May 18 at Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. 

The event kicked off with a 5k Fun Run and included musical entertainment, pickle ball, horseshoes, vendors and a dunking booth.  

“The event was a huge success for the entire MWR Richmond team and volunteers,” said Lamar Denno, marketing manager, DLA Installation Support at Richmond. “The community support and turnout was much larger than anticipated and gives us the inspiration to continue to engage community in new and exciting ways.”  

Denno said he faced many challenges putting the event together, but catering the lunch was the most difficult. However, with the support of the MWR and Center Restaurant staff, the team was able to feed the community. 

“Determining what would get the community members excited about the event, whether it was music, food or activities, it all had to be carefully planned out,” said Denno. “Sweat and lots of effort from our limited staff and volunteers spearheaded the efforts that went into the event. I could not be more proud of our Center Restaurant staff especially when considering most team members had no experience with this type of event.”   

Army Maj. Alex Shimabukuro, DLA Aviation Army Costumer Facing Division operations officer, attended the bash with his wife and two children, arriving just as Installation Support Director David Gibson was volunteering in the dunking tank, operated by the Civilian Welfare Fund.  

“This is a great event for the kids,” said Shimabukuro. “It’s good to see everyone out and enjoying the installation and having fun together.”  

Although this may have been the first Bellwood Bash Family and Friends Day Celebration, MWR plans on making this an annual community event. But this isn’t the only way MWR is reaching out to the Defense Supply Center Richmond family to provide fun and enrich their lives.  

“We at MWR are committed to providing fun amenities, functions or rental equipment that is aimed at enhancing the quality of life for our service members, civilians, retirees and families,” said Denno. “This was our first annual Bellwood Bash and we will continue to improve the details to help make this event even better.”
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 2, 2015

p0630

Order 

Clerk

July 2, 2015

151732

In re NORFLEET/WINBUSH-BEY/NEWTON- BEY/NORFLEET-BEY, Minors. SC: 151732

COA: 323110

Macomb CC Family Division:

2013-000397-NA; 

2013-000398-NA;

2013-000399-NA;

2013-000400-NA;

2013-000401-NA;

2013-000402-NA

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 10.11          Schedule of
Mezzanine Loans for Fannie Portfolio


 


	
  Fannie
  Pool Bucket

  	
   

  	
  Principal Amount of Loan

  	
   

  	
  Interest Rate

  	
   

  	
  Maturity Date

  
	
  Loan A, Bucket 1

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  12,125,000.00

  	
   

  	
  Variable based on LIBOR until Fixed at
  Syndication

  	
   

  	
  11/1/17

  
	
  Loan B, Bucket 1

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  34,594,951.49

  	
   

  	
  Variable based on LIBOR until Fixed at
  Syndication

  	
   

  	
  11/1/17

  
	
  Loan A, Bucket 2

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  38,940,000.00

  	
   

  	
  Variable based on LIBOR until Fixed at
  Syndication

  	
   

  	
  11/1/17

  
	
  Loan B, Bucket 2

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  51,092,737.60

  	
   

  	
  Variable based on LIBOR until Fixed at
  Syndication

  	
   

  	
  11/1/17

  
	
  Loan A, Bucket 3

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  67,135,000.00

  	
   

  	
  Variable based on LIBOR until Fixed at
  Syndication

  	
   

  	
  11/1/17

  
	
  Loan B, Bucket 3

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  91,213,901.54

  	
   

  	
  Variable based on LIBOR until Fixed at
  Syndication

  	
   

  	
  11/1/17

  
	
  Loan A, Bucket 4

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  23,690,000.00

  	
   

  	
  Variable based on LIBOR until Fixed at
  Syndication

  	
   

  	
  11/1/14

  
	
  Loan B, Bucket 4

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  67,556,461.84

  	
   

  	
  Variable based on LIBOR until Fixed at
  Syndication

  	
   

  	
  11/1/14

  
	
  Loan A, Bucket 5

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  7,320,000.00

  	
   

  	
  Variable based on LIBOR until Fixed at
  Syndication

  	
   

  	
  11/1/12

  
	
  Loan B, Bucket 5

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  20,862,967.88

  	
   

  	
  Variable based on LIBOR until Fixed at
  Syndication

  	
   

  	
  11/1/12

  


















 


	
  Loan A, Bucket 7

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  26,580,000.00

  	
   

  	
  Variable based on LIBOR until Fixed at
  Syndication

  	
   

  	
  11/1/12

  
	
  Loan B, Bucket 7

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  71,274,408.53

  	
   

  	
  Variable based on LIBOR until Fixed at
  Syndication

  	
   

  	
  11/1/12

  
	
  Loan A, Bucket 8

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  5,150,000.00

  	
   

  	
  Variable based on LIBOR until Fixed at
  Syndication

  	
   

  	
  11/1/09

  
	
  Loan B, Bucket 8

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  14,685,933.13

  	
   

  	
  Variable based on LIBOR until Fixed at
  Syndication

  	
   

  	
  11/1/09

  
	
  Loan A, Bucket 9

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  149,320,000.00

  	
   

  	
  Variable based on LIBOR until Fixed at
  Syndication

  	
   

  	
  11/1/09

  
	
  Loan B, Bucket 9

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  87,317,784.61

  	
   

  	
  Variable based on LIBOR until Fixed at
  Syndication

  	
   

  	
  11/1/09
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1517 Referred in House (RFH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1517

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 2005

              Referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To permit Women's Business Centers to re-compete for sustainability 
                                grants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WOMEN'S BUSINESS CENTERS.

    Section 29(k) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656(k)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) Prior recipients.--Notwithstanding subsection (l)(1), 
        any recipient of a grant under subsection (l) whose 5-year 
        project ended in fiscal year 2004, is eligible to apply to 
        receive the funds for grants to continue Women's Business 
        Centers in sustainability status for fiscal year 2005, made 
        available by Public Law 108-447 (118 Stat. 2911).''.

            Passed the Senate July 27, 2005.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### Bruce William HAMPTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-859.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 2, 1978.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Joseph S. Karp, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Benedict P. Kuehne, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

*99PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction appealed from is affirmed, but the cause is remanded to the trial court with instructions to allow appellant credit for time served in jail as a condition of probation. *Freeman v. State,*340 So.2d 1251 (Fla.2d DCA 1976).

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED with instructions.

DOWNEY, C. J, and DAUKSCH and LETTS, JJ., concur.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134549 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan YVONNE MAURINO, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134549 COA: 275858 Wayne CC: 05-533987-NM MARK E. STERN and STERN & ORTNER, P.C., Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 27, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.

l1022 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 29, 2007

Clerk
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 4, 2012

t0827 

# Order

September 4, 2012

144670

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144670

COA: 306751

Wayne CC: 02

- 009461

- 01

LABRELL JONES,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 17 , 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In connection with the Annual Report of Miracor Diagnostics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ross S. Seibert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
USC ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003,
that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

                                                         /s/ Ross S. Seibert
                                                         -------------------
                                                         Ross S. Seibert,
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

Dated: 3/29/04
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1340 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1340

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act to extend the 
date after which surplus funds in the wildlife restoration fund become 
                      available for apportionment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF SURPLUS FUNDS IN WILDLIFE RESTORATION FUND.

    Section 3(b)(2)(C) of the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration 
Act (16 U.S.C. 669b(b)(2)(C) is amended by striking ``2006'' and 
inserting ``2016''.

            Passed the Senate September 9, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1340

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act to extend the 
date after which surplus funds in the wildlife restoration fund become 
                      available for apportionment.
```
#### William BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1104.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 27, 1978.

Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, and W. C. McLain, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and C. Marie King, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

*145The only point which merits discussion is the propriety of the appellant’s sentence to confinement “at hard labor.” To be imprisoned “at hard labor” is improper because no existing state statute provides for its imposition as a sentence for any offense. *Speller v. State,*305 So.2d 231 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974).

Remanded for the purpose of striking the language “at hard labor” from the sentencing order; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22026]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
National Advisory body scheduled to meet during the month of September, 
1997.

    Name: Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines (ACCV).
    Date and Time: September 10, 1997; 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Place: Parklawn Building, Conference Rooms D and E, 5600 Fishers 
Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857.
    The meeting is open to the public.
    The full Commission will meet on Wednesday, September 10 from 
9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: Agenda items will include, but not be limited to: a 
report from the ACCV Subcommittee on Vaccine Safety, an update on 
the passage of excise tax legislation within P.L. 105-34 on H.R. 
2014, an overview of the adjudication process under the National 
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, and routine Program reports.
    Public comment will be permitted before lunch and at the end of 
the Commission meeting on September 10. Oral presentations will be 
limited to 5 minutes per public speaker. Persons interested in 
providing an oral presentation should submit a written request, 
along with a copy of their presentation to: Ms. Melissa Palmer, 
Principal Staff Liaison, Division of Vaccine Injury Compensation, 
Bureau of Health Professions, Health Resources and Services 
Administration, Room 8A-35, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 
Telephone (301) 443-6593. Requests should contain the name, address, 
telephone number, and any business or professional affiliation of 
the person desiring to make an oral presentation. Groups having 
similar interests are requested to combine their comments and 
present them through a single representative. The allocation of time 
may be adjusted to accommodate the level of expressed interest. The 
Division of Vaccine Injury Compensation Program will notify each 
presenter by mail or telephone of their assigned presentation time. 
Persons who do not file an advance request for presentation, but 
desire to make an oral statement, may sign-up in Conference Room D 
and E on September 10. These persons will be allocated time as time 
permits.
    Anyone requiring information regarding the Commission should 
contact Ms. Palmer, Division of Vaccine Injury Compensation, Bureau 
of Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration, 
Room 8A-35, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone (301) 
443-6593.
    Agenda Items are subject to change as priorities dictate.

    Dated: August 14, 1997.
Jane Harrison,
Acting Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination.
[FR Doc. 97-22026 Filed 8-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF
2002
 
 I Willard
G. McAndrew, III, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly
report of Energy & Engine Technology Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Energy & Engine Technology Corporation.
 
 Date:
      August 15, 2005
    /s/
      Willard G. McAndrew, IIIWillard
      G. McAndrew, IIIChief
      Executive Officer