alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Baker, Elder and Bumgardner

TERESA J. CHITTUM MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2149-97-3 PER CURIAM MARCH 24, 1998 GARY L. CHITTUM

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ROCKBRIDGE COUNTY George E. Honts, III, Judge (M. Teresa Harris, on brief), for appellant. Appellant submitting on brief. (H. David Natkin, on brief), for appellee. Appellee submitting on brief.

Teresa Chittum (mother) appeals the decision of the circuit court denying her motion for a change in custody. Mother contends that the trial court erred by (1) granting the motion to strike of Gary Chittum (father); (2) failing to grant her request for a change in custody; and (3) failing to consider the preference of the parties' minor children. We disagree and affirm the decision of the trial court. Motion to Strike "No ruling of the trial court . . . will be considered as a basis for reversal unless the objection was stated together with the grounds therefor at the time of the ruling, except for good cause shown or to enable the Court of Appeals to attain the ends of justice." Rule 5A:18.

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.2 On appeal, mother argues that the trial court erred when it granted father's motion to strike. By order entered December 4, 1996, the trial court granted the motion and found that mother "has not shown evidence of a sufficient change of circumstances to justify a change of custody." The trial court modified mother's visitation schedule, and ordered home studies on both parents. Mother endorsed the decree "Seen." The record contains no indication that mother presented or preserved any objections to the December 1996 order. Accordingly, Rule 5A:18 bars our consideration of this question on appeal. Moreover, the record does not reflect any reason to invoke the good cause or ends of justice exceptions to Rule 5A:18. Change in Custody In its order entered August 13, 1997, the trial court denied mother's request for a change of custody. Mother endorsed the decree "Seen." No objections or exceptions to the court's ruling were attached to the final order. The written statement of facts does not indicate what, if any, objections mother raised at the evidentiary hearing. Our review of this issue is barred by Rule 5A:18. The Court of Appeals will not consider an argument on appeal which was not presented to the trial court. "The purpose of Rule 5A:18 is to 'afford[] "the trial court an opportunity to rule intelligently on the issues presented, thus avoiding unnecessary appeals and3 reversals."'" Newsome v. Newsome , 18 Va. App. 22, 24-25, 441 S.E.2d 346, 347 (1994) (citations omitted). Accordingly, Rule 5A:18 bars our consideration of this question on appeal. Moreover, the record does not reflect any reason to invoke the good cause or ends of justice exceptions to

Rule 5A:18. Failure to Consider Children's Preference The record contains no indication mother raised this issue before the trial court. Therefore, we do not consider this argument on appeal. See Rule 5A:18. Accordingly, the decision of the circuit court is affirmed. Affirmed

.
No. 9558.

#### Benzenhoffer *v.*The Village of New Waterford.

(Decided March 13, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Columbiana county.

*Messrs. Taylor é Harris,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. J. F. Johnston,*village attorney, and *Mr. Louis T. Farr,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shah ok, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Franklin Wireless Corp. (the
"COMPANY") on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I, OC Kim,
Acting Chief Financial Officer the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ OC KIM

------------------------------
OC Kim
Acting Chief Financial Officer
September 22, 2008
#### Leon WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-195.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 2, 1978.

*97Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Frank B. Kessler, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Benedict P. Kuehne, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED on authority of *State v. Clarke,*242 So.2d 791 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970).

DOWNEY, C. J., and CROSS and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
#### Stanley STOVICH, Petitioner, v. CITY GAS COMPANY, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 38377.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 30, 1969.

Alfred D. Bieley, Miami, for petitioner.

Lally, Miller & Hodges, Miami, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission hearing date February 5, 1969.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees is also denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
# DLA Distribution headquarters recognizes veteran employees

/ Published Nov. 22, 2016
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, DLA Distribution headquarters and Army Col. Brad J. Eungard, commander of DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pa., hosted a Veteran’s Day recognition program on Nov. 9, in the auditorium of the brand new Distribution headquarters building.
To begin the ceremony, the emcee, Army Reserve Master Sgt. Kevin Davis invited the Distribution Transportation Container Team to join Distribution deputy commander, Twila Gonzales, SES, on stage. The team was selected as Team of the Quarter, for the third quarter of fiscal year 2016.  

Following the award presentation for Team of the Quarter, Eungard and guest speakers, Thomas A. Brown, the Pennsylvania commander of the Veterans of Foreign Wars and Army Col. David Shank from the United States Army War College in Carlisle, Pa., joined Davis on stage. 

The ceremony was held to honor the men and women working for DLA Distribution who have served the United States in both peace time and war. 

“I want to personally thank all of you who have courageously and honorably served and those of you who continue to serve today,” said Eungard. “Our veterans have fought for and maintained our National Security for 240 years ensuring free elections upholding democracy.”

The ceremony included remarks from the two guest speakers, as well as a field cross ceremony performed by representatives from the William H. Noss American Legion post 143; Sons of the American Legion and the American Legion Riders. The field cross ceremony first began during World War I in order to mark the site of field burials that could later be documented or retrieved.  

In addition, the ceremony recognized 20 DLA Distribution employees who served our nation in a uniformed service. The individual’s names were called, and they were each presented certificates of special recognition.
Following the recognition ceremony, all attendees were invited to a cake cutting ceremony held in the cafeteria.
Exhibit
99.1


For
Immediate Release


July
15, 2008





AJS
BANCORP, INC. ANNOUNCES $0.50 SPECIAL DIVIDEND


AND
DECLARATION OF REGULAR QUARTERLY DIVIDEND





AJS
Bancorp, Inc. (Electronic Bulletin Board; AJSB.OB), the holding company for A.J.
Smith Federal Savings Bank, Midlothian, Illinois announced today that the
Company’s Board of Directors has declared a one-time only special dividend of
$0.50 cents per share.  The dividend is payable on August 19, 2008 to
stockholders of record on August 4, 2008.  Additionally, the Company’s
Board of Directors declared today a quarterly dividend of $0.11 cents per
share.  The dividend is payable on August 22, 2008, to stockholders of
record on August 8, 2008.  AJS Bancorp, MHC (the “MHC”) intends to
waive 100% of the special dividend and quarterly dividend, subject to Office of
Thrift Supervision approval, due on its 1,227,554 shares.  At June 30,
2008, the Company held cash totaling $17.1 million.  At June 30, 2008
the Bank’s tier 1 capital as well as its tangible capital ratio was 10.9%, and
its risk-based capital ratio was 23.3%.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43039]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21049]



[[Page 43039]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Enhanced-Use Development at the Richard L. Roudebush VAMC, 
Indianapolis, IN

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice of Designation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs is 
designating the Richard L. Roudebush Department of Veterans Affairs 
Medical Center, at 1481 West Tenth Street, Indianapolis, Indiana, as a 
site for an Enhanced-Use lease development. The Department intends to 
enter into a 35-year lease of real property to the developer who 
provides the Department with the greatest economic advantages. As part 
of the development, the Department will be seeking to obtain skilled 
nursing home care services and other ``in-kind'' considerations, as 
well as promoting the sharing of services.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Renee Badey, Office of Asset and 
Enterprise Development (189), Veterans Health Administration, 
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 
20420, (202) 565-4307.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 38 U.S.C. Sec 8161 et seq., specifically 
provides that the Secretary may enter into an Enhanced-Use Lease, if 
the Secretary determines that at least part of the use of the property 
under the lease will be to provide appropriate space for an activity 
contributing to the mission of the Department; the lease will not be 
inconsistent with and will not adversely affect the mission of the 
Department; and the lease will enhance the property. This project meets 
these requirements.

    Approved: July 31, 1997.
Hershel W. Gober,
Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 97-21049 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1386 

To exclude from consideration as income certain payments under the national 

flood insurance program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 13, 2005 

Mr. MARTINEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To exclude from consideration as income certain payments 

under the national flood insurance program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PAYMENTS UNDER 

4 NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM. 

5 Chapter I of the National Flood Insurance Act of 

6 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4011 et seq.) is amended by adding at 

7 the end the following new section: 

8 ‘‘SEC. 1324. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PAYMENTS. 

9 ‘‘Assistance provided under a program under this 

10 title for flood mitigation activities (including any assist-
2 

•S 1386 IS

1 ance provided under the mitigation pilot program under 

2 section 1361A, any assistance provided under the mitiga3 tion assistance program under section 1366, and any 

4 funding provided under section 1323) with respect to a 

5 property shall not be considered income or a resource of 

6 the owner (or any lessee or user) of the property when 

7 determining eligibility for or benefit levels under any in8 come assistance or resource-tested program that is funded 

9 in whole or in part by an agency of the United States 

10 or by appropriated funds of the United States.’’. 

Æ
EXHIBIT
10.30
 PAYCHEX, INC.
EMPLOYEE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
  Article 1
Purpose & Effective Date
 Purpose
 Effective Date
 Article 2
Definitions
  Account Balance
 Affiliate
 Amended Distribution Election Form
 Annual Deferral Account
 Annual Election Form




---



##### 



Annual Enrollment Materials
 Annual Participant Deferral
 Base Pay
 Beneficiary
 Board
 Change in Control
 Claimant
 Code
 Committee
 Company
 Deferral Election
 Deferred Compensation Account Account
 2




---



##### 



Designated Fund
 Designation Date
 Disability
 Distribution Election
 Effective Date
 Eligible Compensation
 Employee
 ERISA
 Fiscal-Quarter Bonus Pay
 Investment Adjustment
 3




---



##### 



Investment Agent
 Newly Eligible Employee
 Participant
 Paychex
 Performance-Based Bonus Pay
 Plan
 Plan Year
 Pre-2010 Deferral Account
 Section 409A
 Separation from Service
 Specified Employee
 4




---



##### 



Unforeseeable Emergency
 Article 3
Eligibility, Selection and Enrollment
 Selection by Committee
 Enrollment Requirements
 Commencement of Participation
 Subsequent Plan Year Elections
 5




---



##### 



Article 4
Participant Deferrals, Taxes and Vesting
 Participant Deferrals
 Deferral Election.
 Minimum and Maximum Deferrals.
 Deferral Designations.
 Deferral Deductions.
 6




---



##### 



Suspension of Deferral Elections.
    Paid Leave of Absence.
 Unpaid Leave of Absence.
 7




---



##### 



Vesting
 FICA and Other Taxes
 Annual Deferral Amounts.
 Distributions.
 Article 5
Designated Funds and Investment Adjustments
 Designated Funds
 Investment Directions
  8




---



##### 



provided however
 9




---



##### 



Adjustment of Accounts
 No Investment Liability; Indemnification
 Article 6
Distribution of Accounts
 Distribution Elections
 Initial Election.
 10




---



##### 



Subsequent Election. provided however
 Payment on Specified Date
 Payment upon Separation from Service
 11




---



##### 



Payment upon Death of Participant
 Payment upon Change in Control of Paychex
 Six-Month Delay for Specified Employees
 Withdrawal in the Event of an Unforeseeable Emergency
 Form of Payment
 12




---



##### 



Article 7
Beneficiaries; Participant Data
 Designation of Beneficiaries
   Information to Be Furnished By Participants and Beneficiaries; Inability to Locate
Participants or Beneficiaries
 Article 8
Amendment or Termination
 Amendment provided however
 13




---



##### 



Termination
 Article 9
Administration
 Committee Duties
 Agents
 Article 10
Claims Procedures
 Establishment of Claims Procedures
 14




---



##### 



Presentation of Claim
 Notification of Decision
 Review of a Denied Claim
 Decision on Review
 Article 11
Miscellaneous
 Status of Plan
 15




---



##### 



Section 409A
 Unsecured General Creditor
 Nonassignability
 Not a Contract of Employment
 Terms
 Captions
 16




---



##### 



Governing Law
 Notice
 
   Successors
 Validity
  17
# Dr. Caleb C. Foshee

### Deputy Director, DLA Human Resources

### 

### 

On January 14, 2024, Dr. Foshee became the Deputy Director, DLA Human Resources (J1). Serving as the Deputy, he provides expert professional executive leadership, impetus, and direction in establishing and maintaining a proactive, visionary, vigorous, human resources program that is responsive to the needs of both DLA’s 25,000 employees and its DoD Customers, assuring optimum productivity and goal attainment in all program functions. Under the leadership of the J1 Director, he assists in the strategic planning and program management of human resources activities in support of DLA’s worldwide mission.

Prior to arriving at DLA, Dr. Foshee served as the Deputy Director of the 35th Mission Support Group, Misawa Air Base, Japan. The Mission Support Group, consisting of six squadrons and over 2,400 personnel, is responsible to the 35th Fighter Wing and associate units for the safeguarding and maintenance of Misawa Air Base’s infrastructure, ensuring expeditionary/combat mission readiness with facility and airfield maintenance, personnel and administrative support, installation and resource security, contracting, transportation, supply and logistics planning, chemical and explosive defense, communications and computer systems, and Quality of Life Programs.

Dr. Foshee began his federal career in 2003 with the Air Force, serving in a variety of positions at base-level, Major Command, and the Air Force Personnel Center. After 10 years of Air Force employment, Dr. Foshee became a Regional HR Director for the Indian Health Service, bringing healthcare to native peoples across the states of Arizona, Utah, and Nevada. Dr. Foshee then entered the private sector as Chief Operating Officer for a contracting company in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, broadening his areas of expertise to include legal, finance, benefits, and occupational safety, while managing revenues of $20 million. Finally, Dr. Foshee returned to Air Force employment as the Civilian Personnel Flight Chief at Misawa Air Base, Japan.

Dr. Foshee possesses over 20 years of human resources and mission support experience in both the public and private sectors. His professional education includes training from military institutions including the Air War College, Air Command and Staff College, Marine Corps Command and Staff College, and Squadron Officer School. Dr. Foshee holds a Doctorate in Business Administration from Capella University, a Master of Public Administration from Webster University, and Batchelor’s Degrees in Accounting and Political Science from Western Governors University and Oklahoma State University, respectively.
#### Dionie LAY, Appellant, v. Ruth KRAUSE, Appellee.

No. FF-93.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 29, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 13, 1978.

O. E. Adams, Sr., Pensacola, for appellant.

Ruth Krause, in pro per.

PER CURIAM.

Honoring appellant’s request that we treat the notice of appeal as a petition for commonlaw certiorari, which we do, we nevertheless find from an examination of the record that we have no jurisdiction. (See *Grandin Lake Shores Association, Inc. v. Underwood,*351 So.2d 1131 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Accordingly, the petition is

DISMISSED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
1 ... S eeTe x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OFAPPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 09 - 34 2- CV I N R E DON AL D D . F R E I E R R E L AT OR

----- ----- -- OR I GI NALP R OCE E DI NG

----- ----- -- 

### ME MOR ANDUM OPI NI ON 1

----- ----- -- T h e c o u r t h a s c o n s id e r e d R e la t o r ’s p e t it io n f o rw r it o f m a n d a m u s a n d is oft he opi ni on t hatt he pet i t i on s houl d be di sm i ss ed f orw antofj ur i sd i ct i on. S eeT e x . G o v ’t C o d e A n n . § 2 2 .2 2 1 (b ) (V e rn o n 2 0 0 4 ); I n re Si m m onds , 271 S. W . 3d 874, 879 ( Tex. A pp. — W ac o, 2008 , or i g. pr oc ee di ng) . Accor di ngl y, Rel at or ’ s pet i t i on f orw r i t ofm and am us i s di sm i ss ed.
P E R CU R I AM P A N E L : L IV IN G S T O N , M C C O Y , a n d M E IE R , J J . DEL I VERE D: Oct ob e r15, 2009
# DLA Warrant Officers:  leaders, mentors, technical experts

/ Published March 22, 2017
Richmond, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency’s warrant officers are few in number, averaging only 17 Army billets and one Marine Corps billet, but their impact is felt throughout the enterprise. Touching almost all activities and locations, DLA’s WOs are critical in supporting commanders, service members and other DLA customers. 

The agency’s LOGLINES magazine recently featured DLA Aviation warrant officers. Read the full article to learn why Army Chief Warrant Officer 4 Kevin Ryan, and Army CW3 Michael Jackson and Marine Corps CW3 Jacqueline Elazier-Allison joined the warrant officer corps and the impact they make.
**E****xhibit****31****.****4********C****ertifications********Pursuant to Rule****13a-14(a)**

 

I, John V. Sakys, certify that:

 

|   | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mesa Laboratories, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2019; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date:  | July18, 2019  | /s/John V. Sakys        |
|--------|--------------------|-------------------------|
|   |               | John V. Sakys           |
|   |               | Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries V, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 13, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries V, Inc.