# Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Latitude: 21 o 

# 22’15” N Longitude: 157 o 

# 53’33” W

HDOH Facility ID No. 9-102271 HDOH Release ID No. 99051, 010011, 020028

September 2009

Prepared by:

TEC Inc. 1001 Bishop St. Suite 1400 American Savings Bank Tower Honolulu, Hawaii 96813

Prepared for:

Commander Navy Region Hawaii Environmental Department, Code N45 850 Ticonderoga Street, Suite 110 Pearl Harbor, Hawaii 96860-5101

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2009

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## i 

# Table of Contents

Table of Contents

............................................................................................................................. i Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Project Objective ............................................................................................................. . 6 1.2 Previous Reports .............................................................................................................. 6 1.3 Background .................................................................................................................... .. 7 1.3.1 Site Description ......................................................................................................... 7 1.3.2 Facility Information .................................................................................................. 7 1.3.3 UST Information ....................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Previous Environmental Investigations ............................................................................ 7 1.5 Regulatory Updates ........................................................................................................ 10 1.6 RHMW05 Installation .................................................................................................... 10 2.0 Sample Collection and Analyses ........................................................................................ 10 2.1 Monitoring Well Purging ............................................................................................... 11 2.2 Groundwater Sample Collection .................................................................................... 11 2.3 Groundwater Sample Analyses ...................................................................................... 11 3.1 July 2009 Sample Analytical Results ............................................................................. 15 3.2 Groundwater Contaminant Trend ................................................................................... 16 3.3 Results of Oil/Water Interface Measurements ............................................................... 17 3.4 Groundwater Status ........................................................................................................ 18 4.0 Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................................. 21 5.0 References .......................................................................................................................... 25

List of Tables Table 1 Analytical Results for Quarterly Gr oundwater Sampling Release Response Report ..13 Table 2 MADEP Analytical Results .........................................................................................14 Table 3 Oil/Water Inte rface Measurements ..............................................................................18 Table 4 Action Levels fo r Compounds of Concern ..................................................................18 Table 5 Results Categories and Responses to Groundwater Monitoring Results .....................19
List of Figures Figure 1 MADEP VPH/EPH Analyses ......................................................................................12 Figure 2 TPH Trends in Groundw ater, Round 16 (July 15, 2009) .............................................23 Figure 3 PAH Trends in Groundw ater, Round 16 (July 15, 2009) ............................................24
List of Appendices Appendix A – Laboratory Analytical Reports

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2009

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 1 

# Executive Summary This quarterly groundwater monitoring report presents the results of groundwater sampling conducted on July 15, 2009 at the United States (U S) Navy Bulk Fuel St orage Facility at Red Hill, Oahu, Hawaii (the Facility). The sampli ng and reporting was conducted by TEC Inc. (TEC) for the Fleet and Industrial Supply Center (FISC) at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. Th is report is part of a series of quarterly groundwater monitoring repor ts provided by the US Navy to the State of Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) in accordance with HDOH’s release response requirements. Currently, there are 18 active a nd 2 inactive, 12.5 million gallon, field-constructed underground storage tanks (USTs) located at the Facility.
Background In 2002, the US Navy installed a groundwater monitoring well (cur rently named RHMW01) into the basal aquifer, directly down-gradient from the Facility, within th e lower access tunnel. Groundwater samples from this well indicated that petroleum from the Facility has migrated to the basal aquifer (AMEC, 2002). In 2005, the US Navy began quarterly monitoring of the aquifer to protect their down-grad ient drinking water resource a ssociated with the US Navy Well 2254-01. US Navy Well 2254-01 is located approxi mately 3,000 feet down-gradient from the Facility USTs and provides approximately 24 % of the potable water to the Pearl Harbor Water System (PHWS).
By September 2005, the US Navy had installe d two more groundwater monitoring wells (RHMW02 and RHMW03) within the Facil ity UST system, a background groundwater monitoring well (RHMW04) up-gradient from the Facility adjacent to the US Navy Firing Range, and a groundwater monitoring well within the US Navy Well 2254-01 infiltration gallery (RHMW2254-01).
All five wells were sampled twice as part of a comprehensive environmental investigation and risk assessment (TEC, 2006). For this investig ation, groundwater samples were analyzed for petroleum constituents and compared agains t HDOH Drinking Water E nvironmental Action Levels (EALs) (HDOH, July 2005). In additio n, a three-dimensional (3-D) groundwater model was developed to produce site-specific risk-based levels (SSRBLs) for compounds of concern. The results of this modeling effort indicated that Jet Propulsion (JP)–5 fuel presented the biggest risk to the US Navy water supply, due to its mobility and toxicity. Finally, the model determined that a non-aqueous plume (free product) of JP-5 would need to migrate to within 1,100 feet of the US Navy Well 2254-01 infiltrati on gallery for HDOH EALs to be exceeded within the gallery. Based on this, free-product must be observed at RHMW01 for EALs to be exceeded at the US Navy Well 2254-01.
In April 2009, another groundwater monitoring well (RHMW05) was installed down-gradient from the Facility, within the lower access tunnel between RHMW01 and RHMW2254-01. It was installed to identify the extent of contamin ant migration down-gradient before it reaches the infiltration gallery at RHMW2254-01 (see Figure 2).

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2009

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 2 During the summer and fall of 2008, HDOH updated their EALs, which resulted in significant changes to the action levels associated with methylnaphthalenes. The HDOH Drinking Water toxicity EAL for these compounds was 240  g/L. This concentration assumed that methylnaphthalenes were not human carcinogens. Once evidence emerged and was accepted by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA ) that methylnaphthalenes are carcinogenic to humans, HDOH adopted more rigorous EALs of 4.7  g/L for 1-methylnaphthalene and 24  g/L for 2-methylnaphthale ne (HDOH, 2008).
The HDOH Drinking Water EAL for naphthalene was also updated during this process. Previously, HDOH based their naphthalene EA L on USEPA Region 9 Preliminary Remediation Goal (USEPA PRG) of 6.2  g/L, which is associated with a non-cancer Hazard Index of 1. In deference to the California Department of Pub lic Health’s Drinking Water Notification Levels, (HDOH, 2008) HDOH updated their naphtha lene drinking water EAL to 17  g/L.
Finally, the HDOH Drinking Water EAL for TPH-DRO was increased from 100  g/L to 210  g/L, although the Groundwater Gross Cont amination EAL for TPH-DRO remains 100  g/L.

Groundwater Protection Plan In 2008, the US Navy completed the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility Final Groundwater Protection Plan (TEC, 2008), which specified SSRBLs and various required ac tions based on the category status (i.e., categorie s 1 through 4) of each groundwater monitoring well. The main objective of the Plan is to protect the gr oundwater quality of US Navy Well 2254-01, which provides potable water to the PHWS. This is accomplished by comparing petroleum concentrations in the Facility wells to esta blished SSRBLs and taking appropriate action. A secondary, but important objective of the Plan is to identify leaking USTs by evaluating increasing concentration trends, or the presen ce of free product in one or more groundwater monitoring wells. This quarterly report compares observed wate r quality to these established categories and associated actions.

Current Results On July 15, 2009, five groundwater sample s (i.e., RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW05 and RHMW2254-01), along with the required quality control samples (duplicate, matrix spike, spike duplicate, and trip blank) were collected for analysis. Samples were analyzed for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) quantified as Diesel-Range Organics (DRO) and Gasoline Range Organics (GRO), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), and dissolved lead.
In addition, groundwater samples from RHMW 01, RHMW02, and RHMW03 were analyzed by the Massachusetts Department of Environmenta l Protection (MADEP) met hod (see Figure 1) for Extractable Petroleum Hydro carbons (EPH) and Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (VPH).

TPH-DRO TPH-DRO was detected at 248 micrograms per liter (μg/L) in RHMW01, 1,375 μg/L (i.e., the average of normal and duplicate samples) in RHMW02, and at 491 μg/L in RHMW05 (i.e., the recently installed monitoring well). TPH-DRO was not detected above the laboratory method

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2009

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 3 detection limit (MDL) at RHMW03 and RHMW2254-01. The HDOH Drinking Water EAL and SSRBL for TPH-DRO are 210 μg/L and 4,500 μg/L, respectively.

TPH-GRO For TPH-GRO the HDOH Drinking Water EAL is 100 μg/L. In samples RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW02D (i.e., the duplicate sample co llected), RHMW03, RHMW05, and RHMW2254-01 TPH-GRO was not observed above the laboratory MDL (i.e., 30 μg/L).
Other Parameters above HDOH Drinking Water EALs At RHMW01, the concentration for 1-methyl naphthalene was 9.44 μg/L. At RHMW02, the average concentration between the normal and duplicate sample of 1-methylnaphthalene was 11.9 μg/L. Both these results are a bove the HDOH Drinking Water EAL for 1- methylnaphthalene of 4.7 μg/L.

MADEP-EPH and MADEP-VPH Results EPH and VPH constituents were only detected above the laboratory MDL at RHMW02. At RHMW02, the average of the normal and duplic ate samples for EPH C11 - C22 aromatics averaged 275 μg/L. For EPH C9 - C18 alipha tics, at RHMW02 the average of the normal and duplicate samples was 270 μg/L. The average con centration of the normal and duplicate samples at RHMW02 for total EPH was 545 μg/L.
Also at RHMW02, VPH C9 - C10 aromatics averaged a concentration of 455 μg/L. Total VPH was also detected at RHMW02 with an averag e concentration of 455 μg/L at RHMW02. A separate memorandum that discusses these EPH a nd VPH results relative to the companion TPHDRO and TPH-GRO will be issued.
Trend Analysis The following is a discussion of compounds th at exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs during two or more recent consecutive sampling events, thus establishing a trend:

RHMW01 At RHMW01, concentrations of TPH-DRO have been greater than the HDOH Drinking Water EAL since September 2005, but less than 25 percent of the SSRBL of 4,500  g/L. In July 2009, the result of 248 μg/L TPH-DRO was lower in concentration than any previous round since September 2005. TPH-DRO at RHMW01 is exhibiting a decreasing trend.

RHMW02 At RHMW02, from September 2005 through February 2009, TPH-DRO exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EAL and was greater than 50 percent of the SSRBL (estimated solubility limit of 4,500  g/L). However, in May and July 2009, th e average TPH-DRO c oncentrations (1,810  g/L and 1,375 μg/L respectivel y) exceeded the HDOH Drinking Wa ter EAL, but were below 50 percent of the SSRBL.
The July 2009 average TPH-DRO concentration re presents the lowest concentration observed since September 2005. TPH-DRO is exhibiting a decreasing trend by ha ving significantly

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2009

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 4 decreased over the last three sampling events (i.e., February, May, and July 2009). By way of comparison, in October 2008, the SSRBL for TPH-DRO of 4,500  g/L was exceeded.
For other parameters, although the 1-methylna phthalene average concentration (i.e., 11.9  g/L) exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EAL of 4.7  g/L, there is a decreasing trend associated with 1-methylnaphthalene. The average concentr ations of 1-methylnaphthalene observed during the October 2008, February 2009, May 2009, and July 2009 sampling events has respectively been 67.25  g/L, 22  g/L, 21.25  g/L, and 11.9  g/L.

RHMW03 At RHMW03, historically, conc entrations of TPH-DRO have fluctuated around the HDOH Drinking Water EAL, but have been significantl y lower than corresponding values observed at RHMW01 and RHMW02. However, during the last two sampling events (i.e., May and July 2009), TPH-DRO was not detected above the MDL. These results represent a continuing decreasing trend for TPH-DRO that has existed since October 2008.

RHMW05 At RHMW05 there is an increasing trend for TP H-DRO. The July concentration of TPH-DRO of 491 μg/L 

## exhibited an increase as compared with the May 2009 concentration of 200 μg/L, the 

## first sampling event for RHMW05. 

## However, the July 2009 concentrat ion is less than 25 percent of the SSRBL for TPH-DRO.
US Navy Well 2254-01 At US Navy Well 2254-01, trace concentrations of TPH-GRO and 2-methylnaphthalene that were observed in the February and May 2009 samp ling events were not observed in July 2009. In addition, all other parameters were not detected as well.

Current Groundwater Status To date, there is no observation of a trend (i.e., tw o or more consecutive events) of fuel presence on groundwater at any of the Facility monitoring wells.
US Navy Well 2254-01(measured at RHMW2254-01) Based upon the July 2009 sampling event, the US Navy Well 2254-01 has been removed from the provisional category 1 status since no compounds were detect ed above the laboratory MDLs.

RHMW03 RHMW03 is no longer in Category 1 status b ecause no compounds were detected above the laboratory MDL.
Category 1 Status Locations
There are no Category 1 status locations.

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2009

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 5 Category 2 Status Locations RHMW01 The July 2009 sampling event indicates that RHMW 01 should remain in Category 2 status. This is because the TPH-DRO concentration of 248  g/L is greater than the HDOH Drinking Water EAL (210  g/L), but less than half the SSRBL of 4,500  g/L (estimated solubility limit of JP-5) and the 1-methylnaphthalene concentration (i.e., 9.44  g/L) exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EAL of 4.7  g/L.

RHMW02The July 2009 sampling event results in RHMW02 remaining in Category 2 status since TPHDRO [1,450  g/L and 1,300  g/L (duplicate)] is greater th an the HDOH Drinking Water EAL (210  g/L), but is less than half th e established SSRBL value of 4,500  g/L and the 1- methylnaphthalene average concentration (i.e ., 11.9 μg/L) exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EAL of 4.7  g/L.

RHMW05 Based upon the July 2009 sampling event, the s econd event for this newly installed well, RHMW05 now holds a Category 2 status. TPH- DRO at RHMW05 (i.e., 491μg/L) is above the drinking water EAL of 210 μg/L and has been s howing an increasing trend over the last two rounds (i.e., 200 μg/L in May 2009 and 491μg/L in July 2009).
Category 2 for RHMW01, RHMW02, and RHMW05 requires: 1. Quarterly reports to be sent to HDOH; and 2. Initiation of a leak determination progr am to identify if tanks are leaking.
Category 3 or 4 Status Locations There are no Category 3 or 4 status locations.

Conclusions and Recommendations There is no indication of an immediate threat of disruption to drinking wate r resources of the US Navy Well 2254-01 as a result in the July 2009 data. Based upon the July 2009 data, the US Navy Well 2254-01 has been removed from the provisional Category 1 status that was established following the May 2009 sampling event.
With the exception of RHMW05, compound concentra tions for all the other monitoring wells (i.e., RHMW01, -02, -03, and RHMW2254-01) are exhi biting decreasing contaminant trends and thus have improved in groundwater quality as compar ed to results from recent sampling events. In fact, the July 2009 event has resulted in RHMW03 being removed fr om Category 1 status.
Quarterly groundwater sampling for TPH-DRO, TPH-GRO, VOCs, PAHs, and dissolved lead will continue at the Facility until such time that da ta indicates that a different monitoring plan is warranted. It is recommended that future quarte rly analytical results be closely assessed at RHMW05, since this is currently the only well e xhibiting an increasing contaminant trend (i.e., 200 μg/L in May 2009 and 491μg/L in July 2009 for TPH-DRO).

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2009

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 6 

# 1.0 Introduction This report presents the results of the 16 th 

## groundwater sampling even t, conducted in July 2009 at the Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility, Oahu, Hawaii (her eafter referred to as “the Facility”). The Facility consists of 18 active and 2 inactive underground storage tanks (U STs) operated by the Fleet and Industrial Supply Cent er (FISC), Pearl Harbor. The groundwater sampling and analysis event is part of a groundwater monitoring program for the UST site in response to past UST releases, previous environmental investig ations, and recommendations from the State of Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH). 

# 1.1 Project Objective This groundwater sampling project was performed to evaluate the presence of chemicals of potential concern in groundwater underlying the Facility. The project wa s conducted to ensure the Navy remains in compliance with HDOH UST release response requirements as described in Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR) 11-281 Subc hapter 7, Release Response Action. The groundwater sampling program followe d the procedures described in Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility Groundwater Protection Plan [TEC Inc. (TEC), 2008], also referred to as “the Plan”.
This groundwater sampling event was condu cted by TEC under United States (US) Navy Contract Number N47408-04-D-8514, Task Order No. 54. 

# 1.2 Previous Reports The following groundwater monitoring reports we re previously submitted to the HDOH:

1. Groundwater Sampling Report, First Quarter 2005 (submitted April 2005);
2. Groundwater Sampling Report, Second Quarter 2005 (submitted August 2005);
3. Groundwater Sampling Report, Third Quarter 2005 (submitted November 2005);
4. Groundwater Sampling Report, Fourth Quarter 2005 (submitted February 2006);
5. Groundwater Monitoring Results, July 2006 (submitted September 2006);
6. Groundwater Monitoring Results, December 2006 (submitted January 2007);
7. Groundwater Monitoring Results, March 2007 (submitted May 2007);
8. Groundwater Monitoring Results, June 2007 (submitted August 2007);
9. Groundwater Monitoring Results, September 2007 (submitted October 2007);
10. Groundwater Monitoring Results, January 2008 (submitted March 2008);
11. Groundwater Monitoring Results, April 2008 (submitted May 2008);
12. Groundwater Monitoring Results, July 2008 (submitted October 2008);
13. Groundwater Monitoring Results, October and December 2008 (submitted February 2009);
14. Groundwater Monitoring Results, February 2009 (submitted May 2009); and

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2009

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 7 15. Groundwater Monitoring Results, May 2009 (submitted July 2009) 

# 1.3 Background The following sections provide a description of th e site and information on the Facility and USTs.

1.3.1 Site Description The Facility is located in Halawa Heights on Oahu, Hawaii. Land adjacen t to the north of the Facility is occupied by Halawa Correctional Faci lity and private businesses. Land to the south and west of the Facility includes the Coast Guar d Reservation. Moanalua Valley is located east of the Facility (Dawson, 2006).
The Navy Public Works Department operates a pot able water infiltratio n tunnel approximately 1,550 feet hydraulically down-gradient from th e Facility (Dawson, 2006). The US Navy Well 2254-01 is located approximately 3,000 feet down-grad ient (west) of the Facility and provides approximately 24% of the potable water to th e Pearl Harbor Water System, which serves approximately 52,200 military consumers (TEC, 2008).

1.3.2 Facility Information The Facility consists of 18 act ive and 2 inactive USTs operate d by Navy FISC Pearl Harbor. Each UST has a capacity of 12.5 million gallons. The Facility is located approximately 100 feet above the basal aquifer (Dawson, 2006).

1.3.3 UST Information The USTs were constructed in th e early 1940s. The tanks were c onstructed of steel and currently contain Jet Propulsion (JP)–5 fuel and F-76 (diesel marine fuel ). Previously, se veral tanks stored Navy Special Fuel Oil, Navy Distillate, aviati on gasoline, and motor gasoline. Each tank measures approximately 245 feet in height and 100 feet in diameter. The upper domes of the tanks lie at depths varying between approxima tely 100 feet and 200 feet below the existing ground surface (TEC, 2006). 

# 1.4 Previous Environmental Investigations 1998 to 2001: From 1998 to 2001, the Navy conducted an i nvestigation at the Facility to assess potential releases from the fuel storage USTs and piping systems. In February 2001, the Navy installed a one-inch diameter RHMW01 (previ ously known as MW-V1D) to monitor for contamination of the basal aquifer underlying the Facility. The well was installed and completed at approximately 100 feet below grade within the lower access t unnel. At the time of well completion, depth to water in RHMW01 was measur ed at 86 feet below grade (Dawson, 2006).
In February 2001, groundwater samples collec ted from RHMW01 contai ned total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) concentrations ra nging from 883 micrograms per liter (  g/L) to 1,050  g/L and total lead ranging from 10.4  g/L to 15  g/L. The maximum total lead concentration in the samples was equal to the primar y drinking water standard of 15  g/L for lead and exceeded the HDOH Tier 1 groundwater action level of 5.6  g/L (Dawson, 2006).

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2009

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 8 2005 – Groundwater Sampling: The Navy began quarterly groundwater sampling at existing monitoring wells in 2005. Da wson Group, Inc. collected groundw ater samples from RHMW01 and the Red Hill Navy Pump Station (US Navy We ll 2254-01) in February, June, September, and December 2005.
Samples collected in February and June 2005 were not filtered in the field prior to analysis for lead. Analytical results for samples collected from RHMW01 indicated concentrations of total lead were above the HDOH Tier 1 action level of 5.6  g/L. The results were not considered appropriate for risk assessment si nce the sample had not been filte red. In addition, lead was not a component of fuels from the tanks near RHMW01. Lead may have been part of the Facility construction material (TEC, 2007).
Samples were filtered in September and Decembe r 2005, and dissolved lead concentrations were below the HDOH Tier 1 action level. Concentra tions of all other cont aminants of potential concern were below HDOH Tier 1 action levels.
2005 – Site Investigation: As part of a site investigatio n, TEC installed three groundwater monitoring wells at the Facility between June and September 2005. Well RHMW02 was installed in the lower access tunnel near Tanks 5 and 6. Well RHMW03 was installed in the lower access tunnel near Tanks 13 and 14. Well RHMW04 was installed hydraulically upgradient of the USTs to provide geochemist ry for water moving through the basal aquifer beneath the Facility. Wells RHMW02 and RHMW03 were completed to depths of approximately 125 feet below the tunnel floor, and well RHMW04 was completed to a depth of approximately 300 feet below ground surface outsi de the tunnel. Groundwater samples were collected from the three newly installed well s and two existing wells (RHMW01 and US Navy Well 2254-01) in September 2005.
Naphthalene and trichloroethylene were dete cted in samples collected from RHMW02 at concentrations greater than the HDOH Tier 1 acti on levels. Lead was detected in the sample collected from RHMW01 at a con centration greater than the HDOH Tier 1 action level; however, the sample was not filtered in the field pr ior to analysis. Analytical results for filtered samples obtained by Dawson during the same period indicated concentrations of dissolved lead were below the HDOH Tier 1 action level.
2006 – Site Investigation: Dedicated sampling pumps were in stalled in five wells (RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, RHMW04, a nd US Navy Well 2254-01). TEC collected groundwater samples from the wells in July 2006. The gr oundwater samples were analyzed for petroleum constituents. Naphthalene was detected in sa mples collected from RHMW02 at concentrations above the HDOH Tier 1 action level.
In September 2005, with concurrence from the HDOH, the Navy decided to use the newer HDOH Environmental Action Levels (EALs) for the Red Hill Site Investigation and Risk Assessment project. The EALs are current and pr ovide action levels for more chemicals, and are much more useful for conducting screening risk assessments. Since the HDOH (HDOH May 2005) Policy Letter stated that the two sets of action levels should not be mixed, the Tier 1

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2009

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 9 screening levels presented in HAR Section 11-281-78 would no longer be used to evaluate environmental impact at the Facility.
2006 – Groundwater Sampling: Groundwater samples were collected in December 2006. Analytical results indicated the following:

 No chemicals were detected in groundwat er from US Navy Well 2254-01 or RHMW03;

 TPH as diesel range organics (TPH-DRO) was detected in groundwater above the HDOH Drinking Water EALs in RHMW01; and

 TPH as gasoline range organics (TPH-GRO), TPH-DRO, and naphthale ne were detected in groundwater above the HDOH Dri nking Water EALs in RHMW02.
2007 – Groundwater Sampling: Groundwater samples were co llected in March, June, and September 2007. Analytical resu lts indicated the following:

 No chemicals were detected above HDOH Drinking Water EALs at US Navy Well 2254-01;

 TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW01 during all three sampling events;

 TPH-GRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Wate r EALs at RHMW02 in March;

 TPH-DRO and naphthalene exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02 during all three sampling events;

 1-methylnaphthalene and 2-methylnaphtha lene exceeded the HDOH Groundwater Gross Contamination EAL at RHMW02 duri ng all three sampling events; and

 TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Wate r EALs at RHMW03 in June.
2008 – Groundwater Sampling: Groundwater samples were collect ed in January, April, July, and October 2008. Analytical re sults indicated the following:

 No chemicals were detected above HDOH Drinking Water EALs at US Navy Well 2254-01;

 Trace detections of 1-methylnaphthalene and naphthalene prompted a resample event in December at US Navy Well 2254-01, no chemi cals were detected above the MDL;

 TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW01 during all four sampling events;

 TPH-GRO did not exceed HDOH Dr inking Water EALs at RHMW02;

 TPH-DRO, naphthalene, 1-me thylnaphthalene, and 2-met hylnaphthalene exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02; and

 TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW03 during all four sampling events.
2009 – Groundwater Sampling: Groundwater samples were colle cted in February, May, and July 2009. Analytical results indicated the following:

 No chemicals have been detected above HDOH Drinking Water EA Ls at US Navy Well 2254-01;

 Trace TPH-GRO at US Navy Well 2254-01 was de tected above the laboratory MDL and significantly below the laboratory reporting lim it and HDOH EAL, but has most recently not been detected;

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2009

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 10  TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW01;

 TPH-GRO has not exceed HDOH Dr inking Water EALs at RHMW02;

 TPH-DRO, naphthalene, 1-me thylnaphthalene, and 2-met hylnaphthalene exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02, however most recently only TPH-DRO and 1-methylnaphthalene exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EALs;

 TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW03 in February, but not in May or July; and

 TPH-DRO exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EAL at RHMW05 during the July 2009 sampling event.



# 1.5 Regulatory Updates During the summer and fall of 2008, HDOH updated their EALs, which resulted in significant changes to the action levels associated with me thylnaphthalenes. The drinking water toxicity EAL for these compounds was 240  g/L. This concentration pres umed that methylnaphthalenes were non-carcinogenic. Evidence th at they are human carcinogens has now been accepted by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). As a result, HDOH adopted more rigorous EALs of 4.7  g/L for 1-methylnaphthalene and 24  g/L for 2-methylnaphthalene, corresponding to a residential tap water scenario, an d a 1 in a million cancer risk (HDOH, 2008).
The drinking water EAL for naphthalene has also been updated during this process. Previously, HDOH based their naphthalene EAL on USEPA Region 9 Preliminary Remediation Goal (USEPA PRG) of 6.2  g/L, which is associated with a non-cancer Hazard Index of 1. HDOH has updated their naphthalen e drinking water EAL to 17  g/L, in deference to the California Department of Public Health’s Drinking Wate r Notification Levels, a Hazard Index of 2.7 (HDOH, 2008).
Finally, the HDOH Drinking Water EAL for TPH-DRO was increased from 100  g/L to 210  g/L, although the HDOH Groundwat er Gross Contamination EAL for TPH-DRO remains 100  g/L.


# 1.6 RHMW05 Installation In April 2009, a new groundwater monitoring we ll, RHMW05, was installed by TEC under US Navy Contract Number N47408-04-D-8514, Task Order No. 54. RHMW05 is located downgradient from the Facility, within the lower access tunnel between RHMW01 and RHMW2254- 01(located at the US Navy Well 2254-01). It was inst alled to identify the extent of contaminant migration down-gradient prior to contaminants reaching the infiltration gallery at the US Navy Well 2254-01. 

# 2.0 Sample Collection and Analyses
Field activities relati ng to groundwater sample collection were conducted on July 15, 2009. Groundwater samples were collected from four monitoring wells located inside the Facility lower access tunnel and one mon itoring well located at the Red Hill Navy Pump Station. Sampling and analysis were conducted according to Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility Groundwater Protection Plan (TEC, 2009). A total of eight samples were collected as follows:

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2009

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 11  one environmental sample from RHMW2254-01 (i.e., located at the US Navy Well 2254-01), RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, and RHMW05;

 one duplicate sample from RHMW02 (sampled as RHMWA01 and reported as RHMW02D); and

 one matrix spike and matrix sp ike duplicate from RHMW2254-01. 

# 2.1 Monitoring Well Purging All monitoring wells were purged prior to sampling. In general, well purging was considered complete when no less than three successive water quality parameter measurements had stabilized within approximately 10 percent. Fiel d parameters were measured at regular intervals during well purging and included pH, temperature, specific conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and turbidity. At RHMW02 due to technical difficulti es, in lieu of collecting field parameters, the well was sampled once the historically highest purge water volume was exceeded by over 20 percent. Purge water was collected and disposed in the Facility oil/water separator system. 

# 2.2 Groundwater Sample Collection Each monitoring well was sampled immediatel y following purging. All wells were sampled directly from their dedicated bladder pum p system, except for RHMW02 and RHMW05. RHMW02 and RHMW05 were sampled using disposab le bailers. Samples were placed into sampling containers with appropriate preservati ves [i.e., hydrochloric acid (HCl) for volatile organic analysis, nitric acid (HNO 3 

## ) for dissolved lead]. Dissolved lead samples were filtered in the field and placed in preserved bottles. Sample containers were labeled with the date, sample identification number, type of analysis, and samp ler’s name. The containers were placed on ice in sample coolers and transporte d under chain-of-custody procedur es to the certified laboratory for analysis. 

# 2.3 Groundwater Sample Analyses Groundwater samples were analyzed by SGS Environm ental Service, Inc. in Anchorage, Alaska for TPH-DRO and TPH-GRO by EPA Method 8015B, VOCs by EPA Method 8260B, PAHs by EPA Method 8270C SIM, and dissolved lead by EPA Method 6020. In addition, groundwater samples from RHMW01, RHMW02, and RHMW 03 were analyzed by Test America in Westfield, Massachusetts for EP H and VPH by the MADEP method.
Figure 1 depicts the analytical relationship between samples analyzed for TPH-GRO/TPH-DRO and MADEP VPH/EPH. As seen in Figure 1, if the concentrations of the three EPH fractions and target PAH analytes were added together, it would be equal to a traditional “TPH” value. Similarly, if the three VPH fractions and BTEX/M tBE & naphthalene concentrations were added together, it would equal a GRO value.

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2009

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 12 

# 3.0 Groundwater Sample Analytical Results This section provides a summary of analytical results for groundwater samples collected from four monitoring wells located in the lower access tunnel of the Facility and one monitoring well located at the Red Hill Navy Pump Station. D uplicate sample results from monitoring well RHMW02 are reported in this document as RHMW 02D. A summary of groundwater analytical results for TPH-DRO and TPH-GRO, VOCs, PAHs, a nd dissolved lead is in cluded in Table 1. A summary of groundwater analytical resu lts for the MADEP-EPH and MADEP-VPH is included in Table 2. Complete analytical labo ratory reports are prov ided in Appendix A. Figure 1. MADEP VPH/EPH Analyses

Source: Massachusetts Department of Environmen tal Protection, Implementation of the MA DEP VPH/EPH Approach, Final Policy, October 31, 2002Table 1. Analytical Results for Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Release Response Report (July 15, 2009)Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, HawaiiResult Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RL Result Q MDL RLTPH as DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS210 100248F 161 4301450150 4001300150 400 ND U 150 400491158 421 ND U 163 435TPH as GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS100 100 ND U 30 100 ND U 30 100 ND U 30 100 ND U 30 100 ND U 30 100 ND U 30 1001-METHYLNAPHTHALENE4.7 109.440.158 0.52613.20.156 0.52110.60.165 0.549 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0165 0.05492-METHYLNAPHTHALENE24 10 3.07 0.158 0.526 3.66 0.156 0.521 2.58 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0165 0.0549ACENAPHTHENE370 20 0.18 0.0158 0.0526 0.235 0.0156 0.0521 0.213 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0165 0.0549ACENAPHTHYLENE240 2000 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0156 0.0521 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0165 0.0549ANTHRACENE1800 22 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0156 0.0521 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0165 0.0549BENZO(a)ANTHRACENE0.092 4.7 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0156 0.0521 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0165 0.0549BENZO(a)PYRENE0.2 0.81 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0156 0.0521 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0165 0.0549BENZO(b)FLUORANTHENE0.092 0.75 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0156 0.0521 ND U 0.01650.0549 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0165 0.0549BENZO(g,h,i)PERYLENE1500 0.13 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0156 0.0521 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0165 0.0549BENZO(k)FLUORANTHENE0.92 0.4 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0156 0.0521 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0165 0.0549CHRYSENE9.2 1 0.0159 F 0.0158 0.0526 0.0162 F 0.0156 0.0521 ND U 0.01650.0549 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0165 0.0549DIBENZ(a,h)ANTHRACENE0.0092 0.52 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0156 0.0521 ND U 0.01650.0549 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0165 0.0549ChemicalRHMW01UG/LRHMW02UG/LRHMW03UG/LRHMW2254-01HDOH Drinking WaterEALs1for Human ToxicityUG/LHDOH GroundwaterGross ContaminationEALs2UG/LJuly 15, 2009 July 15, 2009 July 15, 2009 July 15, 2009RHMW05UG/LRHMW02DUG/LJuly 15, 2009 July 15, 2009UG/LUG/L8015B (Petroleum)8270C SIM(PAHs)Method( )FLUORANTHENE1500 130 0.0263 F 0.0158 0.0526 0.0247 F 0.0156 0.0521 0.0199 F 0.01650.0549 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0165 0.0549FLUORENE240 950 0.0952 0.0158 0.0526 0.115 0.0156 0.0521 0.108 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0165 0.0549INDENO(1,2,3-c,d)PYRENE0.092 0.095 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0156 0.0521 ND U 0.01650.0549 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0165 0.0549NAPHTHALENE17 21 5.61 0.326 1.05 8.37 0.323 1.04 6.71 0.341 1.1 ND U 0.0326 0.105 ND U 0.0341 0.11 ND U 0.0341 0.11PHENANTHRENE240 410 0.0349 F 0.0158 0.0526 0.0304 F 0.0156 0.0521 0.0291 F 0.01650.0549 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0165 0.0549PYRENE180 68 0.027 F 0.0158 0.0526 0.0272 F 0.0156 0.0521 0.0189 F 0.01650.0549 ND U 0.0158 0.0526 ND U 0.0165 0.0549 ND U 0.0165 0.05491,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE0.52 50000 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.51,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE200 970 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 11,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE0.067 500 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.51,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE5 50000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 11,1-DICHLOROETHANE2.4 50000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 11,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE (TCP)0.6 50000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 11,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE70 3000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 11,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)0.04 10 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 21,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)0.0065 50000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 11,2-DICHLOROBENZENE600 10 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 11,2-DICHLOROETHANE0.15 7000 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.51,2-DICHLOROPROPANE5 10 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 11,3-DICHLOROBENZENE180 50000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 11,4-DICHLOROBENZENE75 5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5ACETONE22000 20000 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 65 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10BENZENE5 170 ND U 0.12 0.4 ND U 0.12 0.4 ND U 0.12 0.4 ND U 0.12 0.4 ND U 0.12 0.4 ND U 0.12 0.4BROMODICHLOROMETHANE0.22 50000 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5BROMOFORM100 510 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1BROMOMETHANE8.7 50000 ND U 0.94 3 ND U 0.94 3 ND U 0.94 3 ND U 0.94 3 ND U 0.94 3 ND U 0.94 3CARBON TETRACHLORIDE5 520 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1CHLOROBENZENE100 50 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5CHLOROETHANE8600 16 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1CHLOROFORM70 2400 ND U 0.3 1 ND U 0.3 1 ND U 0.3 1 ND U 0.3 1 ND U 0.3 1 ND U 0.3 1CHLOROMETHANE1.8 50000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE70 50000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1cis-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE0.43 50000 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE0.16 50000 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5 ND U 0.15 0.5ETHYLBENZENE700 30 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE0.86 6 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1M,P-XYLENE (SUM OF ISOMERS)10000 20 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2METHYL ETHYL KETONE (2-BUTANONE)7100 8400 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE (4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE)2000 1300 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10 ND U 3.1 10METHYLENE CHLORIDE4.8 9100 ND U 1 5 ND U 1 5 ND U 1 5 ND U 1 5 ND U 1 5 ND U 1 5NAPHTHALENE17 21 ND U 0.62 2 10.1 0.62 2 11.2 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2 ND U 0.62 2STYRENE100 10 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1TETRACHLOROETHYLENE(PCE)5 170 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1TOLUENE100040NDU0 311NDU0 311NDU0 311NDU0 311NDU0 311NDU0 3118260B(VOCs)TOLUENE1000 40 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1trans-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE100 260 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1TRICHLOROETHYLENE (TCE)5 310 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1VINYL CHLORIDE2 3400 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 16020LEAD15 50000 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1 ND U 0.31 1PAHs - Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbonsMDL - Method detection limitVOCs - Volatile organic compoundsRL - Reporting limitUG/L - Micrograms per LiterTPH - Total petroleum hydrocarbonsQ - Data qualifierND - Indicates that the compound was not detected above the stated method detection limitU - Indicates that the compound was analyzed forbut not detected at or above the stated limitF - Indicates that the compound was identified butthe concentration was above the MDL and below the RL-Result exceeds one or both HDOH EALs12Final Drinking Water Action Levels for Human Toxicity, Table D-3a,Screening for Environmental Concerns at Sites withContaminated Soil and Groundwater, HDOH, 2009Groundwater Gross Contamination Action Levels, Table G-1,Screening for Environmental Concerns at Sites withContaminated Soil and Groundwater, HDOH, 2009200Page 1 of 1Table 2. MADEP Analytical Results for Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Release Response Report (July 15, 2009)Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, HawaiiResultQ MDL RL ResultQ MDL RL ResultQ MDL RL ResultQ MDL RL2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE24 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10ACENAPHTHENE370 20 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10ACENAPHTHYLENE240 2000 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10ANTHRACENE1800 22 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10BENZO(a)ANTHRACENE0.092 4.7 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10BENZO(a)PYRENE0.2 0.81 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10BENZO(b)FLUORANTHENE0.092 0.75 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10BENZO(g,h,i)PERYLENE1500 0.13 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10BENZO(k)FLUORANTHENE0.92 0.4 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10TOTAL EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONSNS NS ND U 100 100 540 100 100 550 100 100 ND U 100 100CHRYSENE9.2 1 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS C11-C22 AROMATICNS NS ND U 100 100 270 100 100 280 100 100 ND U 100 100EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS C19-C36 ALIPHATICNS NS ND U 100 100 ND U 100 100 ND U 100 100 ND U 100 100EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS C9-C18 ALIPHATICNS NS ND U 100 100 270 100 100 270 100 100 ND U 100 100FLUORANTHENE1500 130 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10FLUORENE240 950 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10INDENO(1,2,3-cd)PYRENE+DIBENZ(a,h)ANTHRACENENS NS ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10NAPHTHALENE17 21 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10PHENANTHRENE240 410 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10PYRENE180 68 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10BENZENE5 170 ND U 5 5 ND U 5 5 ND U 5 5 ND U 5 5ETHYLBENZENE700 30 ND U 5 5 ND U 5 5 ND U 5 5 ND U 5 5M,P-XYLENE (SUM OF ISOMERS)10000 20 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10NAPHTHALENE17 21 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10 ND U 10 10O-XYLENE (1,2-DIMETHYLBENZENE)NS NS ND U 5 5 ND U 5 5 ND U 5 5 ND U 5 5tert-BUTYL METHYL ETHERNS NS ND U 5 5 ND U 5 5 ND U 5 5 ND U 5 5TOLUENE1000 40 ND U 5 5 ND U 5 5 ND U 5 5 ND U 5 5TOTAL VOLATILE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONSNS NS ND U 100 100 420 100 100 490 100 100 ND U 100 100VOLATILE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS C5-C8 ALIPHATICNS NS ND U 100 100 ND U 100 100 ND U 100 100 ND U 100 100VOLATILE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS C9-C10 AROMATICNS NS ND U 100 100 420 100 100 490 100 100 ND U 100 100VOLATILE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS C9-C12 ALIPHATICNS NS ND U 100 100 ND U 100 100 ND U 100 100 ND U 100 100MADEP EPH - Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons MDL - Method detection limitMADEP VPH - Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons RL - Reporting limitUG/L - Micrograms per LiterND -Q - Data qualifierU - Indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected at or above the stated limit NS- Indicates that the EAL for thecompound is not specified12MethodHDOH DrinkingWater EALs1for Human ToxicityUG/LHDOH GroundwaterGross ContaminationEALs2UG/LChemicalRHMW01UG/LJuly 15, 2009 July 15, 2009 July 15, 2009 July 15, 2009RHMW02UG/LRHMW02DUG/LRHMW03UG/LFinal Drinking Water Action Levels for Human Toxicity, Table D-3a,Screening for Environmental Concerns at Sites withContaminated Soil and Groundwater, HDOH, 2009Groundwater Gross Contamination Action Levels, Table G-1,Screening for Environmental Concerns at Sites withContaminated Soil and Groundwater, HDOH, 2009MADEP EPHMADEP VPHIndicates that the compound was not detected above thestated method detection limitPage 1 of 1

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2009

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 15 

# 3.1 July 2009 Sample Analytical Results All groundwater samples were analyzed for TP H-DRO, TPH-GRO, VOCs, PAHs, and dissolved lead. In addition, groundwater samples from RHMW01, RHMW02, and RHMW03 were analyzed by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protect ion (MADEP) method for Extractable Petroleum Hydro carbons (EPH) and Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (VPH).
The trip blank sample (i.e., a blank sample provi ded by the lab and transported with the sample bottles to detect the potential incursion of cont aminants from outside sources) was analyzed for TPH-GRO, VOCs, and MADEP-VP H. The results for each groundwater monitoring well are discussed below.

RHMW01 TPH-DRO at 248 μg/L, and 1-me thylnaphthalene at 9.44 μg/L exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EALs of 210 μg/L and 4.7 μg/L, re spectively. Trace concentrations of 2- methylnaphthalene, acenaphthene, chrysene, fluora nthene, fluorene, naphthalene, phenanthrene, and pyrene were detected belo w HDOH EALs (Table 1). All other constituents were not detected.

RHMW02 TPH-DRO, 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, acenaphthe ne, chrysene, fluoranthene, fluorene, naphthalene, phenanthrene, and pyren e were detected at RHMW02. TPH-DRO was detected at RHMW02 in the normal and dupl icate samples, at 1,450 μg/L and 1,300 μg/L, respectively. This result exceeded the HDOH EAL of 210 μg/L, but not the site-specific risk based level (SSRBL) of 4,500 μg/L. TPH-GRO wa s not detected above the laboratory MDL of 30 μg/L.
Naphthalene was analyzed by USEPA Method 8270C SIM and USEPA Method 8260B. USEPA Method 8260B produced the highest naphthalene concentrations, which averaged 10.65 μg/L from the normal and duplicate sample (HDOH Dr inking Water EAL is 17 μg /L). In addition, 1-methylnaphthalene and 2-methylnapthalene were detected by USEP A Method 8270C SIM in the normal and duplicate samples. The average result for 1-methylnaphthalene was 11.9 μg/L, exceeding the HDOH toxicity EAL of 4.7 μg/L. Th e average result for 2-methylnaphthalene was 3.12 μg/L, less than the HDOH Drinking Wate r EAL of 24 μg/L. All other petroleum constituents, including trace concentrations of acenaphthene, chrysene, fluoranthene, fluorene, naphthalene, phenanthrene, and pyrene were well below HDOH Drinking Water EALs at RHMW02 (Table 1).
Regarding MADEP analyses, RHMW02 was the on ly sample location that had EPH and VPH chemicals of concern above the laboratory MD L. At RHMW02, the average of the normal and duplicate samples for EPH C11 - C22 aromatics wa s 275 μg/L. For EPH C9 - C18 aliphatics, at RHMW02 the average of the normal and dup licate samples was 270 μg/L. The average concentration of the normal and duplicate samples at RHMW02 for total EPH was 545 μg/L (Table 2).

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2009

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 16 Also at RHMW02, VPH C9 - C10 aromatics averaged a concentration of 455 μg/L. Total VPH was also detected at RHMW02 with an averag e concentration of 455 μg/L at RHMW02. A separate memorandum that discusses these EPH a nd VPH results relative to the companion TPHDRO and TPH-GRO will be issued (Table 2).

RHMW03 No parameters were detected above the laboratory MDLs at RHMW03 (Table 1).

RHMW05 TPH-DRO was detected at a c oncentration of 491 μg/L. This concentration exceeds the HDOH Drinking Water EAL of 210 μg/L and the HD OH Groundwater Gross Contamination EAL of 100 μg/L. All other parameters were not detected (Table 1).
US Navy Well 2254-01 No parameters were detected above the laboratory MDLs at the US Navy Well 2254-01 (Table 1).


# 3.2 Groundwater Contaminant Trend Groundwater samples have been collected and analyzed by TEC since September 2005. Figure 2 shows TPH trends in groundwater at the Facility. Fi gure 3 shows PAH trends in groundwater at the Facility. In these figures , open icons (without da ta) represent locations where the compounds being analyzed we re not detected.
The following is a discussion of compounds th at exceeded HDOH Drinking Water EALs during two or more recent consecutive sampling events, thus establishing a trend:

RHMW01 At RHMW01, concentrations of TPH-DRO have been greater than the HDOH Drinking Water EAL since September 2005, but less than 25 percent of the SSRBL of 4,500  g/L. In July 2009, the result of 248 μg/L TPH-DRO was lower in concentration than any previous round since September 2005. TPH-DRO at RHMW01 is exhibiting a decreasing trend.

RHMW02 At RHMW02, from September 2005 through February 2009, TPH-DRO exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EAL and was greater than 50 percent of the SSRBL (estimated solubility limit of 4,500  g/L). Specifically, the concentration of TPH-DRO was relatively stable at RHMW02 until July 2008, ranging from 2,250 to 2,995 μg/L. However, during the July and October 2008 sampling events, these average co ncentrations increase d. The July 2008 average concentration was 4,055 μg/L and the October 2008 average concentration was 5,420 μg/L. Both of these values were significantly above the HDOH Drinking Water EAL of 210 μg/L, with the October 2008 average also exceeding th e SSRBL of 4,500 μg/L.

However, TPH-DRO at RHMW02 has shown a d ecreasing trend since October 2008. Most recently, the May 2009 average TPH-DRO concentration (i.e., 1,810  g/L) and the July 2009

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2009

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 17 TPH-DRO average concentration (i.e., 1,375 μg/L ) exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EAL, but were below 50 percent of the SSRBL of 4,500 μg/L.
The July 2009 average TPH-DRO concentration repr esents the lowest conc entration observed at RHMW02 since September 2005. TPH-DRO concentr ations have signifi cantly decreased over the last three sampling events (i.e., February, May, and July 2009).
For other parameters, although the 1-methylna phthalene average concentration (i.e., 11.9  g/L) exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EAL of 4.7  g/L, there is a decreasing trend associated with 1-methylnaphthalene. The average concentr ations of 1-methylnaphthalene observed during the October 2008, February 2009, May 2009, and July 2009 sampling events has respectively been 67.25  g/L, 22  g/L, 21.25  g/L, and 11.9  g/L.

RHMW03 At RHMW03, historically, conc entrations of TPH-DRO have fluctuated around the HDOH Drinking Water EAL, but have been significantl y lower than corresponding values observed at RHMW01 and RHMW02. However, during the last two sampling events (i.e., May and July 2009), TPH-DRO was not detected above the MDL. These results represent a continuing decreasing trend for TPH-DRO that has existed since October 2008.

RHMW05 At RHMW05 there is an increasing trend for TP H-DRO. The July concentration of TPH-DRO of 491 μg/L 

## exhibited an increase as compared with the May 2009 concentration of 200 μg/L, the first sampling event for RHMW05. 

## However, the July 2009 concentratio n is less than 25 percent of the SSRBL for TPH-DRO.
US Navy Well 2254-01 At US Navy Well 2254-01, trace concentrations of TPH-GRO and 2-methylnaphthalene that were observed in the February and May 2009 samp ling events were not observed in July 2009. In addition, all other parameters were not detected as well. 

# 3.3 Results of Oil/Water Interface Measurements The presence and thickness of light-non aque ous phased liquids (LNAPL), otherwise known as free product, released from the USTs is monitored at the Facility (see Ta ble 3). Static water levels and fuel thickness is measur ed to a precision of ± 0.01 feet.
In January 2008, fuel was measured in mon itoring wells RHMW01 and RHMW02 at a thickness of < 0.01 ft, but has not been observed in other monitoring wells. Measurements to determine the presence and thickness of fuel were conducted at RHMW01, RHMW02, RHMW03, and RHMW05 prior to the July 2009 sampling r ound. On August 21, a subsequent round of oil/water interface measurements was conducted. During the last two rounds of measurements, no free product was observed in any of these wells.

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2009

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 18 Table 3. Oil/Water In terface Measurements

Date RHMW01 RHMW02 RHMW03 RHMW05 SWL

(ft) LNAPL (ft) SWL (ft) LNAPL (ft) SWL (ft) LNAPL (ft) SWL (ft) LNAPL (ft) January 2008 17.74 < 0.01 18.78 < 0.01 NT 1 

## NT 1 

## ---- ---- July 2008 19.04 0.00 18.91 0.00 18.86 0.00 ---- ---- October 2008 18.61 0.00 18.56 0.00 18.82 0.00 ---- ---- November 2008 18.50 0.00 18.45 0.00 18.51 0.00 ---- ---- January 2009 19.28 0.00 19.22 0.00 19.27 0.00 ---- ---- February 2009 NT 2 

## NT 2 

## 18.66 0.00 18.75 0.00 ---- ---- March 2009 18.59 0.00 18.57 0.00 18.67 0.00 ---- ---- May 2009 3 

## 18.69 0.00 18.64 0.00 18.72 0.00 NT 5 

## NT 5 

## May 2009 18.91 0.00 18.86 0.00 18.90 0.00 NT 5 

## NT 5 

## July 2009 4 

## 18.66 0.00 18.59 0.00 18.64 0.00 17.91 0.00 August 2009 18.37 0.00 18.30 0.00 18.47 0.00 17.49 0.00 SWL - Static water level, elevation above mean sea level (for RHMW05 this is estimated until the top well casing elevation has been d etermined) LNAP L - Light Non-Aqueous Phased Liquid, fuel pr oduct on groundwater attributed to the Facility ft

- Feet NT - Not Taken 1 - The January 2008 measurement at RHMW03 wa s not taken due to equipment malfunction 2
- During the February 2009 measurements, RHMW01 was inaccessibl e due to extensive work being conducted at Tank 02 3 - The measurements scheduled for April 2009 were postponed until May 6, 2009 due to RHMW05 drilling activities 4 – The June 2009 measurements were skipped due to th e installation of dedicated oil/water interface probes 5 - Oil/water interface measurements were not taken at RHMW05 until the installation of the oil/water interface probe was complet ed ---- - Time period prior to the installation of RHMW05 Oil/water interface measurements were not taken during in April 2008 

# 3.4 Groundwater Status Constituents of concern are defined as petroleum -related chemicals that have been observed in the groundwater samples above the HDOH EALs. In accordance with the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility Final Groundwater Protection Plan (TEC, 2008), Table 4 defines the constituents of concern in gr oundwater at the Facility and the SSRBLs and updated EALs for each (HDOH 2008).
Table 4. Action Levels for Constituents of Concern

Chemical EAL (μg/L) SSRBL (μg/L) Petroleum Mixtures TPH-DRO 210 4,500 TPH-GRO 100 4,500 Semi-Volatile Compounds 1-Methylnaphthalene 4.7 NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 24 NA Naphthalene 17 NA NA – Not applicable or not determined SSRBLs are applicable at RHMW 01, RHMW02, RHMW03, and RHMW05 EALs are applicable at US Navy Well 2254-01

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2009

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 19 In addition, the Plan defines four results categor ies of groundwater status for the Facility, based on concentrations of constituents of c oncern in RHMW01, RHMW 02, RHMW03 and the US Navy Well 2254-01, and requires sp ecific responses when these categories are observed during quarterly groundwater sampling. Table 5 describe s each of the four results categories and identifies response actions to be taken in accordance with the Plan. Table 5. Results Categories and Response Actions to Changes in Groundwater Status

Results Category RHMW02 RHMW03 or RHMW05* RHMW01 US Navy Pumping Well 2254-01

Results Category 1: Result above detection limit but below drinking water EAL and trend for all compounds stable or decreasing A A A,D,M,E

Results Category 2: Trend for any compound increasing or drinking water EAL exceeded A, B A, B A,B,C,D,E,F,G,K, L,O
Results Category 3: Result Between 1/10X SSRBL and SSRBL for benzene, or between 1/2X SSRBL and SSRBL for TPH A,B,G,H,I,J A,B,E,G,H,I,J A,B,C,D,E,F,G,I,J, K,L,O

Results Category 4: Result Exceeding any SSRBL or petroleum product observed A,C,D,E,F,I,J, K,M,N A,C,D,E,F,I, J,K,M,N,O A,C,D,E,F,G,I,J,K, L,O
*RHMW05 was installed in April 2009 and has been subsequently been added to this Table. Specific Responses: A. Send quarterly reports to HDOH B. Begin program to determine the source of leak C. Notify HDOH verbally within 1 day and fo llow with written notification in 30 days D. Notify FISC Chain of Command within 1 day E. Send Type 1 Report (see box below) to HDOH F. Send Type 2 Report (see box below) to HDOH G. Increase monitoring frequency to once pe r month (if concentrations increasing) H. Notify HDOH verbally within 7 days and fo llow with written notification in 30 days I. Remove sampling pumps, measure product in pe rtinent wells with interface probe, re-install pumps if product is not detected. J. Immediately determine leaking tank K. Collect samples from nearby Halawa Deep Monitoring Well (2253-03) and OWDF MW01 L. Provide alternative water source at 2254-01 M. Prepare for alternative wa ter source at US Navy Well 2254-01 N. Re-measure for product every month with reports to HDOH O. Install additional monitoring well downgradient

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2009

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 20 Report Types HDOH Type 1 Report

 Re-evaluate Tier 3 Risk Asse ssment/groundwater model results

 Proposal to HDOH on a course of action HDOH Type 2 Report

 Proposal for groundwater treatment

Free Product Measurements In response to the previous Ca tegory 3 status at RHMW02, free product measurements have been collected at the Facility m onitoring wells (Table 3). To date , there is no tren d (i.e., two or more consecutive events) of fuel presence on groundwater at any of these wells.
US Navy Well 2254-01(measured at RHMW2254-01) Based upon the July 2009 sampling event, the US Navy Well 2254-01 has been removed from the provisional category 1 status since no compounds were detect ed above the laboratory MDLs.

RHMW03 RHMW03 is no longer in Category 1 status b ecause no compounds were detected above the laboratory MDL.
Category 1 Status Locations There are no Category 1 status locations.
Category 2 Status Locations RHMW01 The July 2009 sampling event indicates that RHMW 01 should remain in Category 2 status. This is because the TPH-DRO concentration of 248  g/L is greater than the HDOH Drinking Water EAL (210  g/L), but less than half the SSRBL of 4,500  g/L (estimated solubility limit of JP-5) and the 1-methylnaphthalene concentration (i.e., 9.44  g/L) exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EAL of 4.7  g/L.

RHMW02The July 2009 sampling event results in RHMW02 remaining in Category 2 status since TPHDRO [1,450  g/L and 1,300  g/L (duplicate)] is greater th an the HDOH Drinking Water EAL (210  g/L), but is less than half th e established SSRBL value of 4,500  g/L and the 1- methylnaphthalene average concentration (i.e ., 11.9 μg/L) exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EAL of 4.7  g/L.

RHMW05 Based upon the July 2009 sampling event, the s econd event for this newly installed well, RHMW05 now holds a Category 2 status. TPH- DRO at RHMW05 (i.e., 491μg/L) is above the

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2009

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 21 drinking water EAL of 210 μg/L and has been s howing an increasing trend over the last two rounds (i.e., 200 μg/L in May 2009 and 491μg/L in July 2009).
Category 2 for RHMW01, RHMW02, and RHMW05 requires: 1. Quarterly reports to be sent to HDOH; and 2. Initiation of a leak determination progr am to identify if tanks are leaking.
Category 3 or 4 Status Locations There are no Category 3 or 4 status locations. 

# 4.0 Summary and Conclusions Summary There is no indication of an immediate threat of disruption to drinking wate r resources of the US Navy Well 2254-01 as a result in the July 2009 data. As a result of the July 2009 sampling event, the US Navy Well 2254-01 has been removed from the provisional Category 1 status that was established following the May 2009 sampling event.
With the exception of RHMW05, compound concentrations for all other Facility monitoring wells (i.e., RHMW01, -02, -03, and RHMW2254-01) are exhibi ting decreasing contaminant trends and thus have improved in groundwater qual ity relative to recent sampling events. In fact, the July 2009 event has resulted in RHMW03 bei ng removed from Category 1 status. Currently, RHMW01, RHMW02, and RHMW05 are the only Facility wells with a Category status (i.e., Category 2 status).

Conclusions/Recommendations

 To date, there is no trend (i.e., two or more consecutive events) of fuel presence on groundwater at the Facility wells (Table 3). In fact, fuel on the groundwater has been observed only once (i.e., in January 2008 in RHMW01 and RHMW02 at < 0.01 ft.). It is recommended that the Facility continue re gular monitoring of Facility wells for the presence of fuel on groundwater.

 The concentration of TPH-DRO measured at the new monitoring well, RHMW05, in July 2009 (i.e., 491  g/L) exceeded the HDOH Drinking Water EAL, but was less than half of the SSRBL. RHMW05 is located between RHMW01 and the US Navy Well 2254-01. It is recommended that future quarterly analytic al results be closely assessed at RHMW05 since this is currently the only well exhibiting an increasi ng contaminant trend (i.e., 200 μg/L in May 2009 and 491μg/L in July 2009 for TPH-DRO).

 RHMW01, -02, -03, and RHMW22 54-01 are exhibiting decreas ing contaminant trends and thus have improved in groundwater quality relative to recent samp ling events. It is recommended that quarterly monitoring of the Facility wells continue so that overall groundwater quality trends may be established/ observed and proactive action taken if the groundwater quality begins to s how evidence of deterioration.

 The US Navy Well 2254-01 is not imminently threatened at this time; however, monitoring should continue to evaluate the extent of contaminant migration from upgradient locations.

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2009

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 22  The following activities are planned to monitor and/or clarify the groundwater contamination situation at the Facility: 1. Re-evaluate risk assessment and groundw ater model (TEC, 2007) to ensure both are valid and protective of human health and the envi ronment under the existing conditions; 2. Continue monthly free product m easurements at RHMW01, RHMW02, and RHMW03, and RHMW05; 3. Collect samples from nearby Halawa Deep Monitoring Well (2253-03), OWDF MW01, and RHMW04 to assess regional groundwater trends; 4. Prepare for alternative wa ter source at US Navy Well 2254-01, if appropriate. 5. Continue quarterly groundwater monitori ng of Facility wells for TPH-DRO, TPHGRO, VOCs, PAHs, and lead until such time that new data indicates that a different monitoring program is warranted.

## Figure TPH Trends in Groundwater

Round 16 (July 15, 2009) Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility Oahu, Hawaii The HDOH toxicity EALs were updated in Fall, 2008.

• TPH

- DRO Residential Tap Water EAL is 210 ug/L; and

• TPH

- GRO Residential Tap Water EAL is 100 ug/L; (HDOH, 2008).

## Figure PAH Trends in Groundwater

Round 16 (July 15, 2009) Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility Oahu, Hawaii The HDOH toxicity EALs were updated in Fall, 2008.

• Naphthalene Residential Tap Water EAL is 17 ug/L;

• 1- methylnaphthalene Residential Tap Water EAL is 4.7 ug/L; and

• 2- methylnaphthalene Residential Tap Water EAL is 24 ug/L (HDOH, 2008).

### Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility September 2009

____________________________________________________________________________________________



## 25 

# 5.0 References
AMEC. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility Investigation Report , Prepared for NAVFAC Pacific, August 2002.
Dawson Group, Inc. Fourth Quarter 2005 Groundwater Sam pling Report, Red Hill Fuel Storage Facility, Hawaii. February 2006.

Hawaii Administrative Rules, Titl e 11, Chapter 281, Subchapter 7.

HDOH. Screening for Environmental Concerns at Sites with Contaminated Soil and Groundwater, Summary Lookup Tables. March 2009.

HDOH. Use of May 2005 Environmental Action Levels (“EALs”) at Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites . Memo. July 2005.

HDOH. Evaluation of Environmental Hazards at Sites with Contaminated Soil and Groundwater . Summer 2008 (updated October 2008).
Massachusetts Department of E nvironmental Protection (MADEP). Implementation of the MADEP VPH/EPH Approach. Final Policy, October 2002
The Environmental Company, Inc. and AMEC. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility Work Plan, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. June 2005.

TEC, Inc. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Fi nal – Addendum Planning Documents, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. May 2006.

TEC, Inc. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Final Technical Report, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii

. August 2007.

TEC, Inc. Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Final Groundwater Protection Plan, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. January 2008.

# Appendix A Laboratory Analytical Reports

## SGS Work Order:

Contents:

Cover Page Case Narrative Final Report Pages Quality Control Summary Forms Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt Forms 

## Project:
Client: 

# SGS North America Inc. Alaska Division Level II Laboratory Data Report

Released by:

Note: Unless otherwise noted, all quality assurance/quality control criteria is in compliance with the standards set forth by the proper regulatory authority, the SGS Quality Assurance Program Plan, and the National Environmental Accreditation Conference. 

## Red Hill BFSF The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)
1093515

# Case Narrative THEENVC The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) 1093515 Red Hill BFSF Customer: Project: NPDL WO: 

# SGS North America Inc.

Refer to the sample receipt form for information on sample condition.


### 1093515004 PS RHMW05-WG16 8015C - DRO - Unknown hydrocarbon with several peaks is present.


### 1093515007 PS RHMW02-WG16 8015C - DRO - The pattern is consistent with a weathered middle distillate.


### 1093515008 PS RHMWA01-WG16 8015C - DRO - The pattern is consistent with a weathered middle distillate.


### 1093515002 BMS RHMW2254-WG16 MS 8015C - GRO - BMS recovery does not meet QC criteria (biased high). Refer to LCS for accuraccy.

# Laboratory Analytical Report

Project: Client:

Workorder No.: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC)



### 1093515

Certification:
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, both technically and for completeness, other than the conditions noted on the sample data sheet(s) and/or the case narrative. This certification applies only to the tested parameters and the specific sample(s) received at the laboratory. 1001 Bishop Street, Suite 1400 Honolulu, HI 96813

Attn: Rick Adkisson T: (808)528-1445 F:(808)528-0768

Tamara Rentz tamara.rentz@sgs.com Project Manager 

### Red Hill BFSF

If you have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance, please contact your SGS Project Manager.

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G roupEnclosed are the analytical results associated with this workorder.
As required by the state of Alaska and the USEPA, a formal Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program is maintained by SGS. A copy of our Quality Assurance Plan (QAP), which outlines this program is available at your request.

The Laboratory certification numbers are AK971-05 (DW), UTS-005 (CS) and AK00971 (Micro) for ADEC and AK100001 for NELAP (RCRA methods: 1020A, 1311, 6010B, 7470A, 7471A, 9040B, 9045C, 9056, 9060, 8015B, 8021B, 8081A/8082, 8260B, 8270C).
Except as specifically noted, all statements and data in this report are in conformance to the provisions set forth by the SGS QAP, the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program and, when applicable, other regulatory authorities.
If you have any questions regarding this report or if we can be of any assistance, please contact your SGS Project Manager at 907-562-2343. 

### All work is being provided under SGS general terms and conditions (http://www.sgs.com/terms_and_conditions.htm)

The following descriptors may be found on your report which will serve to further qualify the data.

MDL Method Detection Limit PQL Practical Quantitation Limit (reporting limit). CL Control Limit U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected. F Indicates value that is greater than or equal to the MDL. J The quantitation is an estimation. ND Indicates the analyte is not detected B Indicates the analyte is found in a blank associated with the sample.

* The analyte has exceeded allowable regulatory or control limits. D The analyte concentration is the result of dilution. GT Greater Than LT Less Than Q QC parameter out of acceptance range. M A matrix effect was present. E The analyte result is above the calibrated range. R Rejected DF Analytical Dilution Factor JL The analyte was positively identified, but the quantitation is a low estimation. <Surr> Surrogate QC spiked standard <Surr/IS> Surrogate / Internal Standard QC spiked standard QC Quality Control QA Quality Assurance MB Method Blank LCS (D) Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate) MS(D) Matrix Spike (Duplicate) BMS(D) Site Specific Matrix Spike (Duplicate) RPD Relative Percent Difference ICV Initial Calibration Verification CCV Continuous Calibration Verification MSA Method of Standard Addition Notes: Soil samples are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise specified Print Date: 8/3/2009

Notes: All DRO/RRO analyses are integrated per SOP.

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G roup

## SAMPLE SUMMARY
Client Name: The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Project Name: Red Hill BFSF Workorder No.: 1093515


## Analytical Methods

Method Description Analytical Method 8270 PAH SIM Semi-Vol GC/MS Liq/Liq ext. 8270D SIMS AFCEE 3.1 8260 (W) SW8260B Dissolved Metals by ICP-MS SW6020 DRO by 8015B (W) SW8015C GRO (W) SW8015C Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm



## Sample ID Cross Reference

Client Sample ID Lab Sample ID
1093515001 RHMW2254-WG16
1093515002 RHMW2254-WG16 MS
1093515003 RHMW2254-WG16 MSD
1093515004 RHMW05-WG16
1093515005 RHMW01-WG16
1093515006 RHMW03-WG16
1093515007 RHMW02-WG16
1093515008 RHMWA01-WG16
1093515009 TB01-WG16

S G S N orth A m erica Inc

. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G roup (S ociété G énérale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW2254-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515001 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 09:00 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Dissolved Metals by ICP/MS

MDL DF

Lead ND 1.00 ug/L MMS5997 MXX21958 0.310 5

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 50 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 50 mL Analytical Batch: MMS5997 Analytical Method: SW6020 Analysis Date/Time: 07/28/09 13:41 Prep Batch: MXX21958 Prep Method: SW3010A Prep Date/Time: 07/27/09 19:20 Container ID:1093515001-G Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: NRB

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW2254-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515001 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 09:00 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Fuels Department

MDL DF

Gasoline Range Organics ND 100 ug/L VFC9556 VXX19707 30.0 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 91.2 50-150 % VFC9556 VXX19707 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VFC9556 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 07/23/09 12:25 Prep Batch: VXX19707 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 07/23/09 08:25 Container ID:1093515001-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: KPW

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW2254-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515001 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 09:00 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

MDL DF

Diesel Range Organics ND 0.435 mg/L XFC8727 XXX21224 0.163 1 5a Androstane <surr> 93.1 50-150 % XFC8727 XXX21224 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 920 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XFC8727 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 07/30/09 02:25 Prep Batch: XXX21224 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 07/21/09 10:15 Container ID:1093515001-H Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: KDC

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW2254-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515001 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 09:00 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

MDL DF

Benzene ND 0.400 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.120 1 Toluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Ethylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 n-Butylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 4-Chlorotoluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Chlorobenzene ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ND 10.0 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 3.10 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 4-Isopropyltoluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 n-Propylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Styrene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Dibromomethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Acetone ND 10.0 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 3.10 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 2.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.620 1 Methyl-t-butyl ether ND 5.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 1.50 1 Tetrachloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Dibromochloromethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 0.400 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.120 1 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Carbon tetrachloride ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 Chloroform ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.300 1 Bromobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Chloromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Bromomethane ND 3.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.940 1 Bromochloromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Vinyl chloride ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW2254-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515001 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 09:00 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

MDL DF Chloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 sec-Butylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Bromodichloromethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 2-Butanone (MEK) ND 10.0 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 3.10 1 Methylene chloride ND 5.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 1.00 1 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 P & M -Xylene ND 2.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.620 1 Naphthalene ND 2.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.620 1 o-Xylene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Bromoform ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1-Chlorohexane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 tert-Butylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 2-Chlorotoluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Trichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> 108 73-120 % VMS10654 VXX19686 1 Toluene-d8 <surr> 99 80-120 % VMS10654 VXX19686 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 104 76-120 % VMS10654 VXX19686 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VMS10654 Analytical Method: SW8260B Analysis Date/Time: 07/20/09 18:57 Prep Batch: VXX19686 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 07/20/09 12:19 Container ID:1093515001-D Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: DSH

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW2254-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515001 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 09:00 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

MDL DF

Acenaphthylene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Acenaphthene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Fluorene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Phenanthrene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Anthracene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Fluoranthene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Pyrene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Benzo(a)Anthracene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Chrysene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Benzo[b]Fluoranthene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Benzo[a]pyrene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Naphthalene ND 0.110 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0341 1 1-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 96.7 50-135 % XMS4994 XXX21226 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 910 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XMS4994 Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS Analysis Date/Time: 07/22/09 04:48 Prep Batch: XXX21226 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 07/21/09 10:40 Container ID:1093515001-J Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JDH

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW05-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515004 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 07:35 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Dissolved Metals by ICP/MS

MDL DF

Lead ND 1.00 ug/L MMS5997 MXX21958 0.310 5

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 50 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 50 mL Analytical Batch: MMS5997 Analytical Method: SW6020 Analysis Date/Time: 07/28/09 14:07 Prep Batch: MXX21958 Prep Method: SW3010A Prep Date/Time: 07/27/09 19:20 Container ID:1093515004-G Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: NRB

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW05-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515004 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 07:35 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Fuels Department

MDL DF

Gasoline Range Organics ND 100 ug/L VFC9556 VXX19707 30.0 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 99.8 50-150 % VFC9556 VXX19707 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VFC9556 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 07/23/09 10:50 Prep Batch: VXX19707 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 07/23/09 08:25 Container ID:1093515004-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: KPW

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW05-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515004 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 07:35 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

MDL DF

Diesel Range Organics 0.491 0.421 mg/L XFC8727 XXX21224 0.158 1 5a Androstane <surr> 83.1 50-150 % XFC8727 XXX21224 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 950 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XFC8727 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 07/30/09 02:52 Prep Batch: XXX21224 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 07/21/09 10:15 Container ID:1093515004-H Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: KDC

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW05-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515004 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 07:35 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

MDL DF

Benzene ND 0.400 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.120 1 Toluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Ethylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 n-Butylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 4-Chlorotoluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Chlorobenzene ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ND 10.0 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 3.10 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 4-Isopropyltoluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 n-Propylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Styrene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Dibromomethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Acetone 65.0 10.0 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 3.10 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 2.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.620 1 Methyl-t-butyl ether ND 5.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 1.50 1 Tetrachloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Dibromochloromethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 0.400 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.120 1 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Carbon tetrachloride ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 Chloroform ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.300 1 Bromobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Chloromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Bromomethane ND 3.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.940 1 Bromochloromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Vinyl chloride ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW05-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515004 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 07:35 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

MDL DF Chloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 sec-Butylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Bromodichloromethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 2-Butanone (MEK) ND 10.0 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 3.10 1 Methylene chloride ND 5.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 1.00 1 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 P & M -Xylene ND 2.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.620 1 Naphthalene ND 2.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.620 1 o-Xylene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Bromoform ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1-Chlorohexane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 tert-Butylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 2-Chlorotoluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Trichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> 113 73-120 % VMS10654 VXX19686 1 Toluene-d8 <surr> 99.9 80-120 % VMS10654 VXX19686 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 106 76-120 % VMS10654 VXX19686 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VMS10654 Analytical Method: SW8260B Analysis Date/Time: 07/20/09 20:36 Prep Batch: VXX19686 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 07/20/09 12:19 Container ID:1093515004-D Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: DSH

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW05-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515004 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 07:35 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

MDL DF

Acenaphthylene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Acenaphthene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Fluorene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Phenanthrene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Anthracene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Fluoranthene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Pyrene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Benzo(a)Anthracene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Chrysene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Benzo[b]Fluoranthene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Benzo[a]pyrene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Naphthalene ND 0.110 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0341 1 1-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 83.7 50-135 % XMS4994 XXX21226 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 910 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XMS4994 Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS Analysis Date/Time: 07/22/09 09:02 Prep Batch: XXX21226 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 07/21/09 10:40 Container ID:1093515004-J Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JDH

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW01-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515005 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 15:15 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Dissolved Metals by ICP/MS

MDL DF

Lead ND 1.00 ug/L MMS5997 MXX21958 0.310 5

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 50 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 50 mL Analytical Batch: MMS5997 Analytical Method: SW6020 Analysis Date/Time: 07/28/09 14:09 Prep Batch: MXX21958 Prep Method: SW3010A Prep Date/Time: 07/27/09 19:20 Container ID:1093515005-G Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: NRB

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW01-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515005 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 15:15 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Fuels Department

MDL DF

Gasoline Range Organics ND 100 ug/L VFC9556 VXX19707 30.0 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 95.8 50-150 % VFC9556 VXX19707 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VFC9556 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 07/23/09 11:09 Prep Batch: VXX19707 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 07/23/09 08:25 Container ID:1093515005-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: KPW

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW01-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515005 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 15:15 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

MDL DF

Diesel Range Organics 0.248 J 0.430 mg/L XFC8727 XXX21224 0.161 1 5a Androstane <surr> 82.6 50-150 % XFC8727 XXX21224 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 930 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XFC8727 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 07/30/09 03:20 Prep Batch: XXX21224 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 07/21/09 10:15 Container ID:1093515005-H Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: KDC

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW01-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515005 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 15:15 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

MDL DF

Benzene ND 0.400 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.120 1 Toluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Ethylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 n-Butylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 4-Chlorotoluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Chlorobenzene ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ND 10.0 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 3.10 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 4-Isopropyltoluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 n-Propylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Styrene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Dibromomethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Acetone ND 10.0 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 3.10 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 2.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.620 1 Methyl-t-butyl ether ND 5.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 1.50 1 Tetrachloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Dibromochloromethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 0.400 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.120 1 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Carbon tetrachloride ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 Chloroform ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.300 1 Bromobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Chloromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Bromomethane ND 3.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.940 1 Bromochloromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Vinyl chloride ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW01-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515005 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 15:15 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

MDL DF Chloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 sec-Butylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Bromodichloromethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 2-Butanone (MEK) ND 10.0 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 3.10 1 Methylene chloride ND 5.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 1.00 1 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 P & M -Xylene ND 2.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.620 1 Naphthalene ND 2.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.620 1 o-Xylene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Bromoform ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1-Chlorohexane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 tert-Butylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 2-Chlorotoluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Trichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> 111 73-120 % VMS10654 VXX19686 1 Toluene-d8 <surr> 98.9 80-120 % VMS10654 VXX19686 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 106 76-120 % VMS10654 VXX19686 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VMS10654 Analytical Method: SW8260B Analysis Date/Time: 07/20/09 21:07 Prep Batch: VXX19686 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 07/20/09 12:19 Container ID:1093515005-D Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: DSH

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW01-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515005 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 15:15 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

MDL DF

Acenaphthylene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Acenaphthene 0.180 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Fluorene 0.0952 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Phenanthrene 0.0349 J 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Anthracene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Fluoranthene 0.0263 J 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Pyrene 0.0270 J 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Benzo(a)Anthracene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Chrysene 0.0159 J 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Benzo[b]Fluoranthene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Benzo[a]pyrene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Naphthalene 5.61 1.05 ug/L XMS4996 XXX21226 0.326 10 1-Methylnaphthalene 9.44 0.526 ug/L XMS4996 XXX21226 0.158 10 2-Methylnaphthalene 3.07 0.526 ug/L XMS4996 XXX21226 0.158 10 Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 84.1 50-135 % XMS4994 XXX21226 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 950 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XMS4994 Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS Analysis Date/Time: 07/22/09 09:36 Prep Batch: XXX21226 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 07/21/09 10:40 Container ID:1093515005-J Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JDH Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 950 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XMS4996 Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS Analysis Date/Time: 07/22/09 18:29 Prep Batch: XXX21226 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 07/21/09 10:40 Container ID:1093515005-J Dilution Factor: 10 Analyst: JDH

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW03-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515006 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 10:55 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Dissolved Metals by ICP/MS

MDL DF

Lead ND 1.00 ug/L MMS5997 MXX21958 0.310 5

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 50 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 50 mL Analytical Batch: MMS5997 Analytical Method: SW6020 Analysis Date/Time: 07/28/09 14:11 Prep Batch: MXX21958 Prep Method: SW3010A Prep Date/Time: 07/27/09 19:20 Container ID:1093515006-G Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: NRB

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW03-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515006 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 10:55 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Fuels Department

MDL DF

Gasoline Range Organics ND 100 ug/L VFC9556 VXX19707 30.0 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 97.2 50-150 % VFC9556 VXX19707 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VFC9556 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 07/23/09 11:27 Prep Batch: VXX19707 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 07/23/09 08:25 Container ID:1093515006-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: KPW

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW03-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515006 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 10:55 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

MDL DF

Diesel Range Organics ND 0.400 mg/L XFC8727 XXX21224 0.150 1 5a Androstane <surr> 88.3 50-150 % XFC8727 XXX21224 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 1000 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XFC8727 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 07/30/09 03:30 Prep Batch: XXX21224 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 07/21/09 10:15 Container ID:1093515006-H Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: KDC

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW03-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515006 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 10:55 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

MDL DF

Benzene ND 0.400 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.120 1 Toluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Ethylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 n-Butylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 4-Chlorotoluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Chlorobenzene ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ND 10.0 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 3.10 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 4-Isopropyltoluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 n-Propylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Styrene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Dibromomethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Acetone ND 10.0 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 3.10 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 2.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.620 1 Methyl-t-butyl ether ND 5.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 1.50 1 Tetrachloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Dibromochloromethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 0.400 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.120 1 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Carbon tetrachloride ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 Chloroform ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.300 1 Bromobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Chloromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Bromomethane ND 3.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.940 1 Bromochloromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Vinyl chloride ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW03-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515006 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 10:55 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

MDL DF Chloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 sec-Butylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Bromodichloromethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 2-Butanone (MEK) ND 10.0 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 3.10 1 Methylene chloride ND 5.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 1.00 1 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 P & M -Xylene ND 2.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.620 1 Naphthalene ND 2.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.620 1 o-Xylene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Bromoform ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1-Chlorohexane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 tert-Butylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 2-Chlorotoluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Trichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> 115 73-120 % VMS10654 VXX19686 1 Toluene-d8 <surr> 99.9 80-120 % VMS10654 VXX19686 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 106 76-120 % VMS10654 VXX19686 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VMS10654 Analytical Method: SW8260B Analysis Date/Time: 07/20/09 21:38 Prep Batch: VXX19686 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 07/20/09 12:19 Container ID:1093515006-D Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: DSH

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW03-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515006 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 10:55 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

MDL DF

Acenaphthylene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Acenaphthene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Fluorene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Phenanthrene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Anthracene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Fluoranthene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Pyrene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Benzo(a)Anthracene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Chrysene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Benzo[b]Fluoranthene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Benzo[a]pyrene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Naphthalene ND 0.105 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0326 1 1-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.0526 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0158 1 Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 97.1 50-135 % XMS4994 XXX21226 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 950 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XMS4994 Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS Analysis Date/Time: 07/22/09 10:09 Prep Batch: XXX21226 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 07/21/09 10:40 Container ID:1093515006-J Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JDH

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW02-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515007 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 13:20 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Dissolved Metals by ICP/MS

MDL DF

Lead ND 1.00 ug/L MMS5997 MXX21958 0.310 5

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 50 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 50 mL Analytical Batch: MMS5997 Analytical Method: SW6020 Analysis Date/Time: 07/28/09 14:13 Prep Batch: MXX21958 Prep Method: SW3010A Prep Date/Time: 07/27/09 19:20 Container ID:1093515007-G Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: NRB

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW02-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515007 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 13:20 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Fuels Department

MDL DF

Gasoline Range Organics ND 100 ug/L VFC9556 VXX19707 30.0 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 96.8 50-150 % VFC9556 VXX19707 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VFC9556 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 07/23/09 11:46 Prep Batch: VXX19707 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 07/23/09 08:25 Container ID:1093515007-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: KPW

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW02-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515007 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 13:20 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

MDL DF

Diesel Range Organics 1.45 0.400 mg/L XFC8727 XXX21224 0.150 1 5a Androstane <surr> 78.9 50-150 % XFC8727 XXX21224 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 1000 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XFC8727 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 07/30/09 03:39 Prep Batch: XXX21224 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 07/21/09 10:15 Container ID:1093515007-H Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: KDC

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW02-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515007 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 13:20 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

MDL DF

Benzene ND 0.400 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.120 1 Toluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Ethylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 n-Butylbenzene 1.51 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 4-Chlorotoluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Chlorobenzene ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ND 10.0 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 3.10 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 4-Isopropyltoluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 n-Propylbenzene 2.49 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Styrene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Dibromomethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Acetone ND 10.0 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 3.10 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 2.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.620 1 Methyl-t-butyl ether ND 5.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 1.50 1 Tetrachloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Dibromochloromethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 0.400 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.120 1 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Carbon tetrachloride ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 Chloroform ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.300 1 Bromobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Chloromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Bromomethane ND 3.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.940 1 Bromochloromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Vinyl chloride ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW02-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515007 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 13:20 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

MDL DF Chloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 sec-Butylbenzene 3.48 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Bromodichloromethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 2-Butanone (MEK) ND 10.0 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 3.10 1 Methylene chloride ND 5.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 1.00 1 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 P & M -Xylene ND 2.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.620 1 Naphthalene 10.1 2.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.620 1 o-Xylene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Bromoform ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1-Chlorohexane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 tert-Butylbenzene 0.610 J 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 2-Chlorotoluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Trichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) 2.58 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> 115 73-120 % VMS10654 VXX19686 1 Toluene-d8 <surr> 99.5 80-120 % VMS10654 VXX19686 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 107 76-120 % VMS10654 VXX19686 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VMS10654 Analytical Method: SW8260B Analysis Date/Time: 07/20/09 22:09 Prep Batch: VXX19686 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 07/20/09 12:19 Container ID:1093515007-D Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: DSH

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMW02-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515007 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 13:20 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

MDL DF

Acenaphthylene ND 0.0521 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0156 1 Acenaphthene 0.235 0.0521 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0156 1 Fluorene 0.115 0.0521 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0156 1 Phenanthrene 0.0304 J 0.0521 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0156 1 Anthracene ND 0.0521 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0156 1 Fluoranthene 0.0247 J 0.0521 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0156 1 Pyrene 0.0272 J 0.0521 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0156 1 Benzo(a)Anthracene ND 0.0521 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0156 1 Chrysene 0.0162 J 0.0521 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0156 1 Benzo[b]Fluoranthene ND 0.0521 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0156 1 Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 0.0521 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0156 1 Benzo[a]pyrene ND 0.0521 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0156 1 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene ND 0.0521 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0156 1 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene ND 0.0521 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0156 1 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND 0.0521 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0156 1 Naphthalene 8.37 1.04 ug/L XMS4996 XXX21226 0.323 10 1-Methylnaphthalene 13.2 0.521 ug/L XMS4996 XXX21226 0.156 10 2-Methylnaphthalene 3.66 0.521 ug/L XMS4996 XXX21226 0.156 10 Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 84.9 50-135 % XMS4994 XXX21226 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 960 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XMS4994 Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS Analysis Date/Time: 07/22/09 10:43 Prep Batch: XXX21226 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 07/21/09 10:40 Container ID:1093515007-J Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JDH Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 960 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XMS4996 Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS Analysis Date/Time: 07/22/09 19:03 Prep Batch: XXX21226 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 07/21/09 10:40 Container ID:1093515007-J Dilution Factor: 10 Analyst: JDH

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMWA01-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515008 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 12:05 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Dissolved Metals by ICP/MS

MDL DF

Lead ND 1.00 ug/L MMS5997 MXX21958 0.310 5

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 50 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 50 mL Analytical Batch: MMS5997 Analytical Method: SW6020 Analysis Date/Time: 07/28/09 14:15 Prep Batch: MXX21958 Prep Method: SW3010A Prep Date/Time: 07/27/09 19:20 Container ID:1093515008-G Dilution Factor: 5 Analyst: NRB

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMWA01-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515008 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 12:05 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Fuels Department

MDL DF

Gasoline Range Organics ND 100 ug/L VFC9556 VXX19707 30.0 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 103 50-150 % VFC9556 VXX19707 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VFC9556 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 07/23/09 12:05 Prep Batch: VXX19707 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 07/23/09 08:25 Container ID:1093515008-A Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: KPW

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMWA01-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515008 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 12:05 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Semivolatile Organic Fuels Department

MDL DF

Diesel Range Organics 1.30 0.400 mg/L XFC8727 XXX21224 0.150 1 5a Androstane <surr> 76.5 50-150 % XFC8727 XXX21224 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 1000 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XFC8727 Analytical Method: SW8015C Analysis Date/Time: 07/30/09 03:48 Prep Batch: XXX21224 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 07/21/09 10:15 Container ID:1093515008-H Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: KDC

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMWA01-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515008 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 12:05 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

MDL DF

Benzene ND 0.400 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.120 1 Toluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Ethylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 n-Butylbenzene 1.59 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 4-Chlorotoluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Chlorobenzene ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ND 10.0 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 3.10 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 4-Isopropyltoluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 n-Propylbenzene 2.33 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Styrene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Dibromomethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Acetone ND 10.0 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 3.10 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 2.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.620 1 Methyl-t-butyl ether ND 5.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 1.50 1 Tetrachloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Dibromochloromethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 0.400 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.120 1 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Carbon tetrachloride ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 Chloroform ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.300 1 Bromobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Chloromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Bromomethane ND 3.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.940 1 Bromochloromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Vinyl chloride ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMWA01-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515008 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 12:05 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Volatile Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy

MDL DF Chloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 sec-Butylbenzene 3.23 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Bromodichloromethane ND 0.500 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.150 1 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 2-Butanone (MEK) ND 10.0 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 3.10 1 Methylene chloride ND 5.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 1.00 1 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 P & M -Xylene ND 2.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.620 1 Naphthalene 11.2 2.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.620 1 o-Xylene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Bromoform ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1-Chlorohexane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 tert-Butylbenzene 0.560 J 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 2-Chlorotoluene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Trichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene) 2.36 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1.00 ug/L VMS10654 VXX19686 0.310 1 1,2-Dichloroethane-D4 <surr> 111 73-120 % VMS10654 VXX19686 1 Toluene-d8 <surr> 99.8 80-120 % VMS10654 VXX19686 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene <surr> 105 76-120 % VMS10654 VXX19686 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 5 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 5 mL Analytical Batch: VMS10654 Analytical Method: SW8260B Analysis Date/Time: 07/20/09 22:40 Prep Batch: VXX19686 Prep Method: SW5030B Prep Date/Time: 07/20/09 12:19 Container ID:1093515008-D Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: DSH

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)

### The Environmental Company, Inc. (TEC) Print Date: 8/3/2009 4:39 pm

Client Sample ID: 

### RHMWA01-WG16 SGS Ref. #: 1093515008 Collection Date/Time: 07/15/09 12:05 Receipt Date/Time: 07/17/09 11:00 Project ID: Red Hill BFSF Matrix: Water (Surface, Eff., Ground)

Analytical Batch Prep

Batch PQL/CL Units Qualifiers Parameter Result 

### Polynuclear Aromatics GC/MS

MDL DF

Acenaphthylene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Acenaphthene 0.213 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Fluorene 0.108 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Phenanthrene 0.0291 J 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Anthracene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Fluoranthene 0.0199 J 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Pyrene 0.0189 J 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Benzo(a)Anthracene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Chrysene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Benzo[b]Fluoranthene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Benzo[k]fluoranthene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Benzo[a]pyrene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Indeno[1,2,3-c,d] pyrene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene ND 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Naphthalene 6.71 1.10 ug/L XMS4996 XXX21226 0.341 10 1-Methylnaphthalene 10.6 0.549 ug/L XMS4996 XXX21226 0.165 10 2-Methylnaphthalene 2.58 0.0549 ug/L XMS4994 XXX21226 0.0165 1 Terphenyl-d14 <surr> 94.2 50-135 % XMS4994 XXX21226 1

Batch Information Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 910 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XMS4994 Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS Analysis Date/Time: 07/22/09 11:17 Prep Batch: XXX21226 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 07/21/09 10:40 Container ID:1093515008-J Dilution Factor: 1 Analyst: JDH Initial Prep Wt./Vol.: 910 mL Prep Extract Vol.: 1 mL Analytical Batch: XMS4996 Analytical Method: 8270D SIMS Analysis Date/Time: 07/22/09 19:36 Prep Batch: XXX21226 Prep Method: SW3520C Prep Date/Time: 07/21/09 10:40 Container ID:1093515008-J Dilution Factor: 10 Analyst: JDH

S G S N orth A m erica Inc. A laska D ivision 200 W est P otter D rive A nchorage A laska 99518 t ( 907 ) 562

. 2 343 f ( 907 ) 561

. 5 301 w w w . us. sgs.com M em ber of S G S G rou p (S ociété G éné rale de S urveillance)