alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6224
RASTAMAN MTUME OBALAJI MFUME I, a/k/a Herbert Lee Bailey, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PARKER EVATT; WILLIAM R. DAVIS; TERRY BROOKS; VERNON CHANDLER, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-3175-20BD) Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 3, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rastaman Mtume Obalaji Mfume I, Appellant Pro Se. William Paul Griggs, GRIGGS, SPRUILL & HARRIS, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Appellant's case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1988). Themagistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Appellant that failure to file timely and specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district courtorder based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to file specific objections to the magistrate judge's recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); Orpiano v. Johnson , 687 F.2d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1982). See generally Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review by failing to file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's request for appointed counsel and affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 23.1 CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  in this  Annual  Report on Form
10-KSB of Armitec,  Inc. of our report dated April 23, 2002,  except for Note 7,
as to  which  the  date  is  May  5,  2002  included  in the  Annual  Report  to
Stockholders  of Armitec,  Inc. as of December  31, 2001 and for the Period from
July 24, 2000 (inception of development stage) to December 31, 2000.



/s/ Braverman & Company, P.C.
-----------------------------
Certified Public Accountants
Prescott, Arizona
May 9, 2002
#### Myrtle F. PHILLIPS, Individually and as Administratrix of the Succession of Griffin Phillips v. Louis NEREAUX, Jr., Irene Phillips Nereaux, and Carolyn June Phillips Hayes.

No. 11739.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

May 1, 1978.

Samuel C. Cashio, Charles R. Browning, Maringouin, for appellants-defendants, Louis Nereaux, Jr., Irene Phillips Nereaux and Carolyn June Phillips Hayes.

Patrick W. Pendley, of Freeman & Pend-ley, Plaquemine, for appellee-plaintiff, Myrtle F. Phillips, Individually and as Adminis-tratrix of the Succession of Griffin Phillips.

PER CURIAM.

In plaintiff-appellee’s application for a rehearing, she contends this court erred in reversing the trial judge’s finding of fact that the February 9,1973 sales was simulations.

A simulated sale is that in which there is no intention to transfer title. The trial judge found an intention to transfer title inasmuch as he found these acts to be donations and subsequently awarded the defendant daughters an undivided interest in the property. Since he found an intent to transfer title, he was in error in finding a simulation.

The intention to pay the promissory notes is evidenced by payment of $4,600.00 by Irene Phillips Nereaux to her father and by Carolyn June Phillips Hayes allowing her father to collect and keep rental payments after the transfer of the property. If there was no intention to pay the notes as found by the trial judge, there was no necessity for the above payments. Thus, the trial judge was in error in not recognizing an intent to pay.

Appellee additionally argues we erred in failing to mention she is entitled to “legal interest” on her claim, and from what date this interest runs.

The original opinion is amended to award “legal interest” from date of judicial demand on the surviving wife’s claim and in all other respects our original opinion is affirmed and a rehearing is denied.

REHEARING DENIED.

PONDER, J., dissents from denial of rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries VI, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 25, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries VI, Inc.
EXHIBIT 23

          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

               We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
          Statement Nos. 33-23232, 33-34384, 33-43910, and 33-50040 on Form
          S-3 and in Registration Statement Nos. 2-90684, 2-94306, 33-0840,
          33-17698, 33-25628,  33-36851, 33-41720, 33-56302,  33-73194, 33-
          57735, and 333-01941 on Form S-8 of our reports dated November 8,
          1996, appearing  in and incorporated by reference  in this Annual
          Report  on Form  10-K of  Ballard Medical  Products for  the year
          ended September 30, 1996.

                                                      Deloitte & Touche LLP
                                                       Salt Lake City, Utah
                                                           November 8, 1996
# Cost summit continues pursuit of financial transparency

/ Published Nov. 14, 2016

In an ongoing effort to facilitate discussion of financial issues with its customers, Defense Logistics Agency Finance and Logistics Operations leaders hosted their quarterly cost summit at the McNamara Headquarters Complex on Nov. 7.

The meeting was co-chaired by DLA Finance Director Tony Poleo and Mike Scott, deputy director of DLA Logistics Operations. Attendees included leaders from all the military services, the Office of Secretary of Defense, U.S. Transportation Command, DLA’s primary level field activities and other DLA headquarters employees. Officials from the U.S. Government Accountability Office also participated for the first time in an observer role.

The seventh of these meetings saw discussion of recurring topics such as transportation costs, performance based logistics, audit readiness and market basket approach, which aligns customer rates with level of effort. But attendees also provided input as to what they wanted to discuss.

Scott said it was important to field requests from the military services.

“This isn’t just about what information we want to present – we want to hear what our customers want to talk about and build the cost summits on their interest areas,” he said.

Poleo echoed the original criticality of the meetings to opening lines of communication between DLA and its customers. 

“We weren’t trying to hide anything from our customers,” he said. “We decided to just get it out there in our cost summits.”  

This summit featured briefing topics outside the norm, such as the Defense Logistics Management System, customer-facing initiatives and an overview of DLA’s Nuclear Enterprise Support Office program.  

Col. Steve Petters, NESO’s deputy director provided an overview of DLA’s support to the nuclear enterprise, to include logistics themes found in various reports which formed the basis for the NESO lines of effort.  

"We've implemented four lines of effort that will ensure DLA provides world-class support to our nuclear enterprise customers," Petters said. 

Mike Cannon, DLA Disposition Services director provided an overview of the benefits the military services derive from his organization’s reutilization and disposal services.

“For their service level bill, they get about a tenfold return in reutilization,” he said. “They get assets that were turned in by another service or by someone else in their service back from us for free ... and that’s in addition to performing normal scrap receipts and removing excess and hazardous waste and managing recyclables.” 

Cannon said much of the equipment the services get is new or just slightly used. 

Even considering depreciation of the assets, “we’re still a bargain,” Cannon said. 

Both Scott and Poleo promised to continue the commitment toward financial transparency as they thanked everyone for their support.  

“I was a skeptic when these [cost summits] began, but now, I’m a disciple,” Poleo said. “We’ll just keep sharing.”
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22439]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3887-000]


Long Island Lighting Company; Notice of Filing

August 19, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 28, 1997, Long Island Lighting Company 
(LILCO) filed Service Agreements for Non-Firm Point-to-Point 
Transmission Service between:

(1) LILCO and ProMark Energy (Transmission Customer); and
(2) LILCO and PECO Energy Company-Power Team (Transmission 
Customer).

    The Service Agreements specify that the Transmission Customer has 
agreed to the rates, terms and conditions of the LILCO open access 
transmission tariff filed on July 9, 1996, in Docket No. OA96-38-000.
    LILCO requests waiver of the Commission's sixty (60) day notice 
requirements and an effective date of July 8, 1997, for the ProMark 
Energy and the PECO Company-Power Team Service Agreement. LILCO has 
served copies of the filing on the New York State Public Service 
Commission and on the Transmission Customers.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before August 29, 1997. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make the protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22439 Filed 8-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
DSCR opens Wellness Center, offers relaxation, massage
 
  By Kimberly K. Fritz, DLA Aviation Public Affairs
  Do you ever feel like you need a quiet place to relax your body and mind during the busy work day or before heading home? If you answered yes, Defense Logistics Agency Installation Operations at Richmond’s Morale, Welfare and Recreation Office’s newly opened Wellness Center is the answer. The Wellness Center, located inside the Fitness Center, Building 33, D-Bay on Defense Supply Center, Richmond, Virginia, has several new services available to MWR patrons on DSCR. The aesthetically pleasing décor welcomes one inside, and once there, the fragrant aromas beckons one to move deeper into the center where two relaxation rooms, three massage rooms and a body composition analyzer are found. Each of the relaxation rooms has two fully-reclining chairs and a small table with a low-emitting light. The center is a whisper-zone to create and maintain a peaceful area. More than 11 styles of massage are available for a fee, said Will Marjenhoff, Fitness Center director. “Massage therapy has many benefits,” Marjenhoff said. “It releases endorphins and enhances the mood of the individual getting the massage. It boosts energy, reduces depression, anxiety and stress, increases circulation and lowers blood pressure. There are many benefits to the therapy.” Patrons may choose chair or table massages for 15, 30 or 60 minutes. The cost for 15 minutes is $16, 30 minutes is $30 and 60 minutes is $60. All reservations must be made in person and paid for at the time of scheduling. Exact amounts of cash, checks and credit cards are accepted. The therapist has appointments available 2-6 p.m. Monday-Friday, the relaxation rooms are free and are open each day 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. The body composition analyzer that can give individual’s their weight, fat percentage, fat, muscle and bone masses and body mass index only takes about three minutes to complete. Whole and segmental body analysis is available. This service is free. To make an appointment or for more information, visit the Fitness Center front counter.
No. 9596.

#### American Surety Company of New York *v.*The Akron Savings Bank Co. et al.

(Decided March 27, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Summit county.

*Messrs. D. A. Doyle,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Grant & Sieber,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1546 

To amend the Food Stamp Act of 1977 to permit participating households 

to use food stamp benefits to purchase nutritional supplements providing 

vitamins or minerals, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 28, 2005 

Mr. HARKIN (for himself and Mr. HATCH) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, 

and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Food Stamp Act of 1977 to permit participating households to use food stamp benefits to purchase 

nutritional supplements providing vitamins or minerals, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Food Stamp Vitamin 

5 and Mineral Improvement Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds that— 
2 

•S 1546 IS

1 (1) the dietary patterns of Americans often do 

2 not comply with the daily intakes of vitamins and 

3 minerals the Food and Drug Administration rec4 ommends; 

5 (2) children in low-income families and the el6 derly often fail to achieve adequate nutrient intakes; 

7 (3) pregnant women have particularly high nu8 trient needs, which they often fail to meet; 

9 (4)(A) scientific studies show that nutritional 

10 supplements containing folic acid (a B vitamin) may 

11 prevent as many as 60 to 80 percent of neural tube 

12 birth defects; 

13 (B) the Public Health Service, in September 

14 1992, recommended that all women of childbearing 

15 age who are capable of becoming pregnant consume 

16 at least 0.4 milligrams of folic acid per day to re17 duce the risk of spina bifida and other neural tube 

18 birth defects affecting the fetus; and 

19 (C) the Food and Drug Administration has ap20 proved a health claim that folic acid reduces the risk 

21 of neural tube birth defects; 

22 (5) infants who do not receive adequate intakes 

23 of iron may suffer from impaired mental and behav24 ioral development; and 
3 

•S 1546 IS

1 (6) scientific evidence indicates that increased 

2 intake of specific nutrients over an extended period 

3 of time protects against diseases and conditions such 

4 as osteoporosis, cataracts, cancer, and heart disease. 

5 SEC. 3. USE OF FOOD STAMPS TO PURCHASE VITAMINS 

6 AND MINERALS. 

7 Section 3(g)(1) of the Food Stamp Act of 1977 (7 

8 U.S.C. 2012(g)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘or food prod9 uct’’ and inserting ‘‘, food product, or nutritional supple10 ment providing a vitamin or mineral’’. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,075,161
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    727,561
<ALLOWANCES>                                      34,529
<INVENTORY>                                    1,062,043
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,872,646
<PP&E>                                           310,362
<DEPRECIATION>                                   162,205
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,034,415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            442,309
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           6,032
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,580,684
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,034,415
<SALES>                                        6,126,132
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,159,741
<CGS>                                          4,473,826
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,619,526
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  18,400
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  521,815
<INCOME-TAX>                                     200,623
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              321,192
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     321,192
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       1.23



</TABLE>
[4910-13-PJ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION N(:URRENCE~ ROUTlNGSYMIIOL Federal Aviation Administration 

## II(P-V.U.

ACTION: Supplemental notice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM); reopening ofcomm nt - 

# 7-tlz~/dj mNGSYMil(l\. 

## 11(.-«. 

## B.

(DOT). AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation RlN 2120-AA64 [Docket No. FAA-2009-0003; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM·251-AD]

A340-2oo, -300, -500 and -600 Series Airplanes Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-200 and -300 Series Airplanes, and 14CFR Part 39

period. 

## C.G-<..v-- r:'f- - ID SUMMARY; We arerevising an earlier NPRM fortheproducts listed above. This acti /

### o'!5fto O\ll1N\i

SYfL revises the earlier NPRM by expanding the scope. This AD results from mandatory
- 11l(l continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct anunsafe condition on an aviation product. The lITlNGS","OOl MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: Several cases ofcorrosion and damage onthe Down Drive Shafts (DDS), between the Down Drive Gear Box (DDGB) and the Input Gear Box (!pGB), on all 10Flap Tracks (5per wing), have been reported by AIRBUS Long Range Operators. Investigations have revealed that corrosion andwear due to absence of grease in the spline interfaces could cause [DDS] discOImection which could result inafreemovable flap surface. potentially leading to aircraft asymmetry or even flap detachment.



### * 

## * * 

## * * * 

## *
****Scheduled Agency Report and Summaries** img src="../hmgraphs/nasscal1.gif" alt="[NASS Reports Calendar]">USDA Economics and Statistics System**
# L_2023013EN.01000101.xml

| 16.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 13/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 13/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/107

of 9 January 2023

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Châtaigne des Cévennes’ (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France’s application to register the name ‘Châtaigne des Cévennes’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France’s application to register the name ‘Châtaigne des Cévennes’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Châtaigne des Cévennes’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Châtaigne des Cévennes’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Châtaigne des Cévennes’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6 – Fruit, vegetables and cereals fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 January 2023.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 346, 9.9.2022, p. 7.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
#### The NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. LENOX LIQUORS, INC., Appellee.

No. 75-1869.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 19, 1978.

Wicker,' Smith, Blomqvist, Davant, McMath, Tutan & O’Hara and Richard A. Sherman, Miami, for appellant.

Theodore M. Trushin and Michael B. Solomon, Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and NATHAN, JJ.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on February 8, 1977 affirming the order of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida in the above styled cause; and

WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed December 15,1977 (358 So.2d 533) and mandate now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment;

NOW, THEREFORE, It is Ordered that the judgment of this court filed February 8, 1977 is vacated and the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, the order of the trial court appealed herein is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16(b) Florida Appellate Rules).