alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 9143.

#### Wright *v.*The City of Cincinnati.

(Decided April 17, 1906.)

Error to Superior Court of Cincinnati.

*Mr. Rogers Wright,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Charles J. Hunt,*city solicitor, and *Mr. John V. Campbell,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Florida ex rel., Peggy HAMILTON, Relator, v. The Honorable Murray GOODMAN, as Judge of the Criminal Court of Record in and for Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 69-781.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 15, 1969.

Prebish & Masin, Miami, for relator.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an original proceeding in prohibition. The suggestion alleged that the relator, having been informed against for a crime triable in the criminal court of record in Dade County, while released on bond had made written demand for trial in three successive terms of the court, during which she was not brought to trial. The suggestion sought a writ to prohibit the court from proceeding with a trial scheduled for a subsequent term. We issued a rule nisi, and thereafter the cause was heard and considered on the suggestion and the briefs and arguments of counsel.

The state does not dispute the allegations of the suggestion as to the written demands for trial in three successive terms of the court, and that the defendant was not tried prior to the end of the third term, but contends there were circumstances amounting to waiver by the defendant, or which otherwise were such as to legally justify subsequent trial. However, the matters upon which the state places such reliance are not disclosed in the record here.

The suggestion made a prima facie case for discharge of the relator under § 915.01 (2) Fla.Stat., F.S.A. See State ex rel. Bird v. Stedman, Fla.App.1969, 223 So. 2d 85. The state argues that the suggestion in prohibition in such case must negative, and show the absence of circumstances which could operate as a waiver by the defendant, or which otherwise could justify the subsequent trial. We cannot agree. It is essential that any such circumstances or matters which may have been present at the proceedings in the trial court, which in legal effect could operate to render nugatory the defendant’s right to discharge as conferred by the statute for not having been tried timely as pro*45vided for therein, should appear in the record in the trial court, and be duly presented here by the respondent.

Accordingly, the rule nisi in prohibition is made absolute. Unless necessary, a formal writ of prohibition will not be issued.

It is so ordered.
#### Frederick YOUNGBLOOD v. BELDEN CONCRETE PRODUCTS, a Division of Marine Concrete Structures, Inc. and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.

No. 60775.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 1977.

In re: Marine Concrete Structures, Inc., Belden Concrete Products Div., and Fidelity and Guaranty Ins. Co., applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 349 So.2d 439.

Writ denied. Judgment not final.
Exhibit 99.1


                                     [LOGO]


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
---------------------

Espey Announces Special Dividend and Increases Regular Quarterly Dividend...

Saratoga Springs, NY; February 25, 2008- The Board of Directors of Espey Mfg. &
Electronics Corp., (AMEX:ESP) has declared a special cash dividend of $1.50 per
share and increased the regular quarterly dividend from $0.175 per quarter, to
$0.20 per quarter. The dividends will be payable on March 20, 2008, to all
shareholders of record on March 6, 2008.

Espey's primary business is the development, design, and production of
specialized military and industrial power supplies/electronic equipment. The
Company's web site can be found on the Internet at www.espey.com.
                                                   -------------

For further information, contact Mr. Howard Pinsley or Mr. David O'Neil at (518)
245-4400.

Certain statements in this press release are "forward-looking statements" and
are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements represent the
Company's current expectations or beliefs concerning future events. The matters
covered by these statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in the
forward-looking statements. The Company wishes to caution readers not to place
undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of
the date made.

                        #################################


                                       1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22436]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3556-000]


Roxdel; Notice of Filing

August 19, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 25, 1997, ROXDEL tendered for filing an 
amendment to its July 1, 1997, application for an order accepting rate 
schedule for power sales at market-based rates. The amendment 
incorporates certain modifications to ROXDEL's filed Rate Schedule and 
provides additional information on the issue of load pockets.
    A copy of this filing has been served on the New York State Public 
Service Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 285.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before August 29, 1997. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22436 Filed 8-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Agricultural Chemical Usage, Field Crops Summary (9X171)**
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of Echo Bay Mines Ltd. and in the related prospectuses of our Report
and Comments by Auditors for U.S. Readers or Canada-U.S. Reporting Difference
dated January 31, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Echo Bay Mines Ltd. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2000:

1.   Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-35857) pertaining to Echo Bay
     Mines Ltd. and Echo Bay Resources, Inc.

2.   Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 2-84687) pertaining to the Employee
     Share Incentive Plan of Echo Bay Mines Ltd.

3.   Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-91696) pertaining to the
     Director Equity Plan and amending the Employee Share Incentive Plan of Echo
     Bay Mines Ltd.

4.   Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-31835) pertaining to the
     Employee Share Incentive Plan and Restricted Share Grant Plan of Echo Bay
     Mines Ltd.



Edmonton, Canada                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
January 31, 2001                        Chartered Accountants
EX-10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 

FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO

 CONSULTING AGREEMENT 

BETWEEN 
 KARYOPHARM
THERAPEUTICS 
 AND 

MIRZA CONSULTING 
 WHEREAS,
Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. (“Karyopharm”) and Mirza Consulting (“Consultant”) previously entered into a Consulting Agreement effective as of September 1, 2012 (the “Agreement”); 

WHEREAS, the Term of the Agreement was set to commence on the Effective Date and scheduled to terminate on August 31, 2015; 

WHEREAS, the Compensation to Consultant was set such that the initial fee of $10,000 per month was to increase effective January 1, 2013
to $16,000 per month; 
 WHEREAS, the Parties now agree to extend the Agreement for an additional one year; and 

WHEREAS, the Parties now agree to amend the Consulting Fees payable to Consultant. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is modified as follows: 
  

	1.	Section 2 is hereby revised to read: “Term. This Agreement shall commence on the date hereof and shall continue until August 31, 2016 (such period, as it may be extended or sooner terminated
in accordance with the provisions of Section 4, being referred to as the “Consultation Period”). 

  

	2.	Section 3.1 is hereby revised to read: “Consulting Fees. The Company shall pay to the Consultant a consulting fee of $10,000 per month to be increased to $16,000 per month effective
January 1, 2013 and to be increased to $22,500 per month effective January 1, 2015. Payment for any partial month shall be prorated.” 


Except as specifically amended by this First Amendment, the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment is effective as of September 1, 2015. 
  


									
	KARYOPHARM THERAPEUTICS INC.	 		 	MIRZA CONSULTING
					
	Signature	 	/s/ Christopher B. Primiano	 		 	Signature	 	/s/ Mansoor Raza Mirza, MD
	Name:	 	Christopher B. Primiano	 		 	Name:	 	Mansoor Raza Mirza, MD
	Title:	 	SVP, Corporate Development & General Counsel	 		 		 	


  
 Page 1 of 1
No. 9031.

#### The Manhattan Restaurant Co. *v.*The H. S. Pogue Co.

(Decided March 13, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Mr. G. E. Schell,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Otis TI. Fish,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
#### Keith O. MALKEMES, Appellant, v. Kathryn W. MALKEMES, Appellee.

No. 77-1425.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 29, 1978.

Rehearing Denied April 27, 1978.

*224T. H. “Ted” Brousseau, Jr., Naples, for appellant.

George O. Kluttz of Pavese, Shields, Garner, Haverfield & Kluttz, Fort Myers, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The primary thrust of this appeal is whether the court properly awarded appel-lee a 100% special equity in a house and two condominium apartments which had been acquired in tenancy by the entirety during the parties’ short marriage. This suit for dissolution was filed subsequent to *Ball v. Ball,*335 So.2d 5 (Fla.1976), so none of the *pre-Ball*presumptions were applicable.

The record contains clear and convincing evidence to support the court’s conclusion that the apartments were bought with money which the appellee had obtained from a source unconnected with the marital relationship and that she did not intend to make a gift of the funds. There is similar evidence with respect to the house except that not all of the monies for its purchase were furnished by the appellee. The record reflects that the appellant contemporaneously supplied $4,000 of his own funds toward the down payment and he signed a joint note with appellee for another $7,000 to be applied thereon. Since the down payment was approximately $30,000, the appellee’s interest in the house should have been limited to 75%.

The other points raised by appellant are without merit. The judgment is modified to the extent that Kathryn W. Caston (formerly Malkemes) shall own an undivided 75% interest and Keith O. Malkemes shall own an undivided 25% interest in the following described property:

> Lot 19, Block 127, Unit 4, MARCO BEACH SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 6, Pages 32-37, Public Records of Collier County, Florida.

AFFIRMED, AS MODIFIED.

GRIMES, Acting C. J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
# Troop Support celebrates MLK legacy

/ Published Feb. 1, 2017
PHILADELPHIA, 

The national day of service on Jan. 16 is a day set aside to follow Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s message of the “Beloved Community” by serving others, a guest speaker told Naval Support Activity Philadelphia employees during a program honoring the civil rights leader Jan. 26.

Guest speaker Sheilah Vance, Esq., professor at Villanova University Law School and a Revolutionary War expert, said those who hadn’t participated in the day of service still had time to “leave their mark.”

“There is still something people can do to answer what Dr. King said is, 'life's most persistent and urgent question, what are you doing for others?'" Vance said.

Army Brig. Gen. Charles Hamilton, DLA Troop Support commander, said during his welcoming remarks that he hoped everyone celebrated King’s birthday.

“The holiday’s theme is ‘Remember! Celebrate! Act! A day on, not a day off,’” said Hamilton. “It reminds us that it is not just a day off from work. And I hope each one of us had an opportunity to help someone else or inspire someone.”

During the ceremony, Vance described the lives of African Americans during the Revolutionary War, including a Philadelphia African-American entrepreneur named James Forten.

Forten faced several hardships throughout his life, from having to support his family after his father died when he was nine, to being captured by the British army during the Revolutionary War. Later in life, he became a successful businessman and civil rights activist after obtaining the sail loft company from his former employer.

Vance also applied King’s words of wisdom to the changes America is experiencing now.

“We have a new president of the United States and new cabinet officers running our nation’s executive branch,” said Vance. “Whether you think that change is for good or for bad, as Dr. King said, ‘we may have all come on different ships, but we're in the same boat now.’”

The DLA Troop Support Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity Office and the NAVSUP Weapons Systems Support Employment Opportunity Advisory Committee sponsored the program.
DOCKET no. FAA-2015-1462

Why granting the exemption would provide an equivalent level of safety to current rules:

Safety is first and foremost in every flight operation. Granting the requested exemption to KFG 

Enterprises, LLC would provide a level of safety equivalent to that provided in current rules. 

Some cases, due to specific mission requirements, would require an enhanced level of safety 

parameters. 

Our company’s SMS (Safety Management System) combined with our risk assessment 

document adds an additional level of safety to the general public when assessing an UAS 

operation.

Our risk assessment worksheet identifies unique aspects of UAS operations. Public Safety, 

mission planning, methods of operation, and protection of people and private property will all 

be our primary focus. 

The FAA has set safety guidelines for traditional aircraft. The operational characteristics and 

capabilities of the UAS have been considered and detailed plans have been implemented, to 

adjust current rules to maintain the safety of persons and property on the ground as well as 

ensuring the safety and security of all who operate in the National Airspace System (NAS). 

The four principals of KFG Enterprises, LLC are all FAA rated pilots with a combined total flight 

time of 34,000 hours. Our knowledge of the National Airspace System, FAA requirements and 

regulations, flight operations, and safety of flight and UAS operations, make us uniquely 

qualified to be granted this exemption.
**Vegetables--Annual Summary (PVG-BB)
A product of the National Agricultural Statistics Service, Agricultural Statistics Board, U.S. Department of Agriculture**Description:**
**
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Crystal Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2004 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  May 13, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 163 (Friday, August 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44740-44741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22327]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 07/07-0099]


Civic Ventures Investment Fund, L.P., Notice of Issuance of a 
Small Business Investment Company License

    On March 18, 1996, an application was filed by Civic Ventures 
Investment Fund, L.P., at One Metropolitan Square, 211 North Broadway, 
Suite 2380, St. Louis, Missouri 63102 with the Small Business 
Administration (SBA) pursuant to Section 107.300 of the Regulations 
governing small business investment companies (13 C.F.R. 107.300 
(1997)) for a license to operate as a small business investment 
company.
    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Section 301(c) of the 
Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, after having 
considered the application and all other pertinent information, SBA 
issued License No. 07/07-0099 on August 1, 1997, to Civic Ventures 
Investment Fund, L.P. to operate as a small business investment 
company.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59.011, Small 
Business Investment Companies)


[[Page 44741]]


    Dated: August 14, 1997.
Don A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 97-22327 Filed 8-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
No. 8853.

#### Wagner, on Behalf, etc. *v.*The Board of Education of the Township of Auglaize, Paulding County.

(Decided March 13, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Paulding county.

*Messrs. Winn £ Hay*and *Messrs. Spriggs £ Spriggs,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. John W. Zuber,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 6, 2022

No. 04-21-00311-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.A.G., J.I.R.G., C.M.R.A., AND G.A. JR., MINOR CHILDREN

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-PA-01608

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On January 12, 2022, we issued a memorandum opinion and judgment in this Anders

appeal, affirming the trial court’s judgment. On January 27, 2022, the pro se appellant timely 

filed a motion for rehearing, and, on March 1, 2022, we denied the motion. On April 1, 2022, 

the pro se appellant filed a motion for extension. Our plenary power over this appeal expired on 

March 31, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 19.1(b). Therefore, we no longer have jurisdiction to grant 

an extension. See id. R. 19.3.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of April, 2022.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
# Small Businesses

/ Published Feb. 8, 2022

Regular training opportunities are available for small businesses who work with or are looking to learn how to work with DLA.  Learn more through the links below:

**Training for Small Businesses**

**Find upcoming training seminars and webinars**

##
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kenneth Cunningham, President and Chief Executive Officer
  of Miranda Gold Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to
  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(i)  | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company, for
        the year ended August 31, 2004, and to which this certification is attached
        as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
        and; and
|---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    
|(ii) | the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                  

| |        | /s/ Kenneth Cunningham               
| | ------ | -------------------------------------
| | By:    |                                      
| | Name:  | Kenneth Cunningham                   
| | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer
|
| |        | Date: May 17, 2005                   

---
# San Diego command hosts FRCSW leadership

/ Published Dec. 13, 2017
SAN DIEGO, Calif., DLA Distribution San Diego, California, hosted DLA Distribution Current Operations deputy director, Army Col.  Scot Doboszenski; DLA Finance pricing strategist, Abby Ruud; and DLA Finance financial management specialist Luke White for a strategic customer engagement with the senior leadership of Fleet Readiness Center South West on Nov. 7, to discuss pricing strategy.
FRCSW is one of DLA Distribution’s most important strategic partners engaged in support for Naval Aviation Forces across the Southwest Region of California.  

“Every day our continuous focus is delivering...on our promises and in support of our customers’ requirements,” said DLA Distribution San Diego commander, Navy Capt. Jerome White. “We seek a partnership relationship whereas the perceived value of our service to all our customers, to include FRCSW, is greater than or equal to the monetary value.”

Doboszenski and the DLA Finance team described DLA Distribution’s continued efforts to provide the best possible support to the war fighter at the most equitable cost over the long-term.