alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          19,326
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,788
<ALLOWANCES>                                       419
<INVENTORY>                                     18,346
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,647
<PP&E>                                          22,964
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,189
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  76,344
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,741
<BONDS>                                         10,263
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            97
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    76,344
<SALES>                                         90,194
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,194
<CGS>                                           65,334
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,334
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (117)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 473
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,787
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,592
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,195
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,368
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,827
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27


</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1607 

To amend section 10501 of title 49, United States Code, to exclude solid 

waste disposal from the jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation Board. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 29, 2005 

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself and Mr. CORZINE) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL

To amend section 10501 of title 49, United States Code, 

to exclude solid waste disposal from the jurisdiction of 

the Surface Transportation Board.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Solid Waste Environ5 mental Regulation Clarification Affecting Railroads Act of 

6 2005’’. 
2

•S 1607 IS

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO EXCLUDE SOLID WASTE DIS2 POSAL FROM THE JURISDICTION OF THE 

3 BOARD. 

4 Section 10501 of title 49, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (b)(2), by inserting ‘‘except 

7 solid waste management facilities (as defined in sec8 tion 1004 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 6903)),’’ after ‘‘facilities,’’; and 

10 (2) in subsection (c)(2)— 

11 (A) by striking ‘‘over mass’’ and inserting 

12 the following: ‘‘over— 

13 ‘‘(A) mass’’; and 

14 (B) by striking the period at the end and 

15 inserting the following: ‘‘; or 

16 ‘‘(B) the processing or sorting of solid 

17 waste.’’.

Æ
No. 96-482.

#### Jackson et ux. *v.*Internal Revenue Service.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### William T. BENNETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2167.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 23, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 4, 1977.

*15P. D. Aiken, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Harry M. Hipler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

The Appellant was convicted of a felony, possession of marijuana, to which he pleaded nolo contendere after having his Motion to Suppress denied. He specifically reserved his right to appeal the Order denying the Motion to Suppress when he entered his plea of nolo contendere.

The facts are that an employee of a restaurant received a telephone call early in the day saying that the restaurant may be robbed. Appellant and his friends came to the restaurant later and “looked suspicious” to the restaurant employee though he could not articulate anything particularly suspicious. The employee called the police who responded immediately. The police in observing the Appellant first saw that he was talking on the telephone and then observed him pay his check and leave the restaurant. Policemen testified they saw nothing of a suspicious nature in the actions of the Appellant and further stated that they observed one of Appellant’s companions leave in an automobile. The police made no effort to detain the companion.

Police testified they had no suspicion any robbery had been committed or any suspicion that any robbery or any other crime was going to be committed. Notwithstanding all of that, the Appellant’s car was blocked from leaving the restaurant while a computer check was run on the Appellant’s automobile and the Appellant. The police testified that the principal purpose for detaining the Appellant was to have a name to put in the report about the incident.

Appellant’s car was connected to a boat and trailer. While the computer check was being conducted one of the policemen, idly walking about with nothing better to do, shined a light into the boat and saw a lid of marijuana.

The police had no probable cause to stop the Appellant, arrest the Appellant or search anything belonging to the Appellant. They did not even have any suspicion in regard to any of the activities of the Appellant or anyone else. *Bailey v. State,*319 So.2d 22 (Fla.1975).

The conviction of the Appellant is REVERSED.

CROSS and LETTS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1

            PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, John W. Peters, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Suncrest Global
Energy Corp.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.



                           /s/ John W. Peters
Date: February 13, 2006    __________________________________________________
                           John W. Peters, Principal Executive Officer
# Know how to find out changes in operating status during winter weather, other emergencies

/ Published Jan. 4, 2017

There are several ways Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, employees can find out about changes in the installation’s operating status during winter weather and other emergencies.  If there are any changes in operating status during inclement weather (i.e.  delayed openings, closures), the home page of the DLA Aviation public website will display a change in operating status.

Employees can also call the DSCR Information/Hazardous Weather Hotline at (804) 279-3599 or 1-888-3-CLOSED (1-888-325-6733).  

Richmond area television stations (WTVR 6, WRIC 8 and WWBT 12) also run installation delays or closure announcements both on-air and on their web pages. 
 Employees can be notified of changes in DSCR operating status on their mobile or home numbers, text or personal email by signing up for the AtHoc computer-based emergency notification system.  
Emergency Notification Guides are also available in both quick reference and comprehensive versions. The guides outline all of the methods listed above to remain aware of changes to the installation’s operational status.  In addition, the comprehensive guide answers frequently asked questions about operations and telework during inclement weather and other emergencies.To clarify questions and for information on telework during emergencies, the DLA Telework Guidance is available.
AMENDMENT




TO




BY-LAWS




OF




STEWARDSHIP
      FINANCIAL CORPORATION









Article
      V, Section 5.1 of the By-Laws of Stewardship Financial Corporation is
      amended in its entirety to now read  as follows:




Section
      1.  CERTIFICATES;
      UNCERTIFICATED SHARES.  The shares of the Corporation shall be
      represented by certificates, or shall be uncertificated shares that may be
      evidenced by a book entry system maintained by the registrar of such shares,
      or
      a combination of both, in each case as shall be approved by the Board of
      Directors.  Certificates for the Corporation's capital stock shall be
      in such form as required by law and as approved by the Board.  Each
      certificate shall be signed in the name of the Corporation by the Chairman,
      if
      any, or the President or any Vice President and by the Secretary, the Treasurer
      or any Assistant Secretary or any Assistant Treasurer and shall bear the seal
      of
      the Corporation or a facsimile thereof. If any certificate is countersigned
      by a
      transfer agent or registered by a registrar, other than the Corporation or
      its
      employees, the signature of any officer of the Corporation may be a facsimile
      signature. In case any officer, transfer agent or registrar who shall have
      signed or whose facsimile signature was placed on any certificate shall have
      ceased to be such officer, transfer agent or registrar before such certificate
      is issued, it may be issued nevertheless by the Corporation with the same effect
      as if he were such officer, transfer agent or registrar at the date of
      issue.
The Marcellus Shale, PA

Water from hydraulic fracturing operations in 

Pennsylvania’s Marcellus Shale presents a complex water 

treatment challenge. The frac flowback and produced 

waters from natural gas extractions have extremely high 

salinity and total dissolved solids (TDS), requiring 

treatment or disposal. Oasys offers a solution for the 

prohibitively costly treatment and disposal of such 

waters, as low as $3/bbl to treat, compared to $15-20/

bbl for disposal by injection. 

The Challenge

Oasys Water completed a comprehensive four-month 

test of the Membrane Brine Concentrator (MBCTM) 

System in the Marcellus Shale, successfully treating 

1,430 barrels (60,000 gallons) of high salinity produced 

water.

Typical of shale gas produced waters in this region, 

the feed water had greatly variable salinities and other 

constituents. The average salinity of the raw water was 

73,000 mg/L TDS. Boron was measured at 

concentrations that exceeded safe limits for drinking 

water and agriculture applications. Therefore, the 

produced water from the Marcellus Shale required 

energy-intensive treatment or costly disposal. Oasys 

was able to offer an energy efficient and economically 

attractive alternative.

Unconventional waters require unconvential solutions: The image above depicts a section of 

the patented membranes used in the Oasys MBC system.

The Results

The Oasys MBC system consistently produced water 

below 500 mg/L TDS at a high recovery rate. In 

addition, the Oasys MBC system can produce a brine 

concentration over 260,000 mg/L TDS.

In this demonstration with Marcellus Shale produced 

water, it is evident the Oasys MBC system presents 

significant advantages over existing technologies and 

is capable of achieving substantial water recovery from 

highly saline brines, thereby minimizing brine disposal 

volumes and generating high quality clean water 

suitable for numerous beneficial reuses.

Low cost 

A total cost (including pretreatment, installation, 

and energy usage) that was 35% lower than 

mechanical vapor recompression.

High Recovery

A consistently high water recovery of 67% coupled 

with the production of a concentrated salt solution 

applicable to oil and gas operations as 10 lb. brine. 

Quality Water

A treated water quality that consistently met EPA 

disposal standards; water suitable for reuse or safe 

discharge into the environment. 

Case Study: Produced Water, Marcellus Shale

To Inject or Not to Inject? Oasys Offers an Answer to Costly Treatment & Disposal

Think foward.

21 Drydock Avenue, 7th Floor

Boston, MA 02210, USA

info@oasyswater.com

50% 

Savings: The Oasys MBC 

membrane 

technology 

offers a cost 

effective 

alternative for 

the produced 

waters found 

in oil and gas 

production.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET FOUND ON PAGE 4 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGE 6 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE YEAR TO DATE,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             434
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   434
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     434
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,020
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (21,586)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       434
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (21,586)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,586)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (21,586)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,586)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.006)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.006)


</TABLE>
# Department of the Navy, U.S. Marine Corps, Arizona Public Service and Marine Corps Air Station Yuma celebrate completion of on base microgrid 

/ Published Dec. 19, 2016
WASHINGTON, The Department of the Navy (DON), U.S. Marine Corps (MC) and Arizona Public Service (APS) announced the completion of a 25 megawatt (MW) microgrid built on Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Yuma.The completion was commemorated in a celebratory ribbon cutting ceremony today at MCAS Yuma, marking the start of commercial operations for the microgrid. In the event of a system-wide grid outage, the microgrid facility will provide enough backup power to cover 100 percent of current and projected base energy requirements. The microgrid will also be available to produce power to be sent to the grid, to benefit local APS customers.Notable ceremony presenters and attendees included Maj. Gen. John J. Broadmeadow, commander of Marine Corps Installations Command; Brig. Gen. Kevin J. Killea, commanding general of Marine Corps Installations West; Col. Ricardo Martinez, commanding officer, Marine Corps Air Station Yuma; Mr. Mark A. Schiavoni, executive vice president and chief operating officer, Arizona Public Service; and City of Yuma Mayor Douglas J. Nicholls."This project will make MCAS Yuma 100 percent resilient to external grid failures, and is an example of an effort that will ensure our bases remain at the forefront of the defense of the country. The microgrid will provide enough backup power to cover the entire base's current and projected energy requirements, ensuring no disruptions to the base's mission," said Broadmeadow.APS will build, own, operate and maintain the microgrid facility at MCAS Yuma. In exchange for the use of DON land, APS will provide in-kind consideration in the form of backup power during grid outages, ensuring no interruptions to MCAS Yuma’s mission.“Backup power is only one of a microgrid’s great benefits. They also are integral tools for providing our customers with reliable power when energy demand is at its highest. On a hot summer afternoon when Yuma customers are using the most power, we can draw energy from this microgrid,” said Schiavoni. “This helps avoid the expense of building additional infrastructure to meet the peak needs of customers in summer and provides reliable energy when we need it most.”The Navy and Marine Corps have always been leaders in energy innovation, and deployment of resilient energy facilities on DON installations strengthens the DON’s warfighting capabilities. The DON will continue to explore and deploy the next level of energy technology advances such as battery storage, electrification, fuel cells and microgrids to further enhance the DON's energy security, operational capability, strategic flexibility and resource availability. *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Marines website.*
**First Name Last Name**  **Organization/Company**

Justin Koscher American Chemistry Council Rick Duncan Consultant, American Chemistry Council Lee Salamone American Chemistry Council AlexandraFreidberg American Chemistry Council Sandy Gump Fomo* Tom Fishback Fomo* Clarence Tolbert NCFI Lisa Massaro Dow Chemical Co.* Jackie Guscott Solvay Albert Steele Solvay David Williams Honeywell Michael Krupa BASF Peter Bartell RHH Foam Systems* Tim Franklin Clayton Corporation* Doug Raymond Raymond Regulatory Resources for Clayton Corporation Darrell Boverhof Dow Chemical Co.* Helen Walter-TerrinoniDuPont

*Two-Component Low Pressure SPF Manufacturer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

STEVEN GREGORY EAKIN, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 237 WAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 10th day of November, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
PUBLIC LAW 110–366—OCT. 8, 2008 122 STAT. 4025 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6890: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Sept. 22, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 25, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–366 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To extend the waiver authority for the Secretary of Education under section 105 

of subtitle A of title IV of division B of Public Law 109–148, relating to elementary 

and secondary education hurricane recovery relief, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY TO EASE FISCAL BURDENS. 

Section 105 of subtitle A of title IV of division B of Public 

Law 109–148 (119 Stat. 2797) is amended— 

(1) in the second sentence of subsection (b), by striking 

‘‘2008’’ and inserting ‘‘2009’’; and 

(2) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ‘‘for fiscal year 2006 

or 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘for any fiscal year’’. 

SEC. 2. HOLD HARMLESS FOR LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES 

SERVING MAJOR DISASTER AREAS. 

In the case of a local educational agency that serves an area 

in which the President has declared that a major disaster exists 

in accordance with section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 

Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170), related 

to severe storms, tornadoes, or flooding in the Midwest or hurricanes 

in the Gulf of Mexico in calendar year 2008, the amount made 

available for such local educational agency under each of sections 

1124, 1124A, 1125, and 1125A of the Elementary and Secondary 

Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6333, 6334, 6335, and 6337) 

for fiscal year 2009 shall be not less than the amount made available 

for such local educational agency under each of such sections for 

fiscal year 2008. 

Approved October 8, 2008. 

Oct. 8, 2008 

[H.R. 6890] 


kgrant on POHRRP4G1 with PUBLAW