alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2023056EN.01002901.xml

| 23.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 56/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 56/29

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2022/2583 of 19 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) 2021/2278 suspending the Common Customs Tariff duties referred to in Article 56(2), point (c), of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 on certain agricultural and industrial products

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 340 of 30 December 2022
  )

| 1. | On page 15, in the Annex replacing the Annex to Regulation (EU) 2021/2278, in the table, in the entry relating to serial number 0.3227, under the column ‘CN code’: |
| --- | --- |

1.

On page 15, in the Annex replacing the Annex to Regulation (EU) 2021/2278, in the table, in the entry relating to serial number 0.3227, under the column ‘CN code’:

for:

‘
  2846 90 30

2846 90 40

2846 90 50

2846 90 60

2846 90 90
  ’,

read:

‘
  2846 90 30

2846 90 40

2846 90 50

2846 90 60

2846 90 70

2846 90 90
  ’.

| 2. | On page 201, in the Annex replacing the Annex to Regulation (EU) 2021/2278, in the table, in the entry relating to serial number 0.7029, under the column ‘CN code’: |
| --- | --- |

2.

On page 201, in the Annex replacing the Annex to Regulation (EU) 2021/2278, in the table, in the entry relating to serial number 0.7029, under the column ‘CN code’:

for:

‘
  ex 8505 11 00
  ’,

read:

‘
  ex 8505 11 10
  ’.

---
#### ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation, Appellant, v. Antonio CALVES and Ondina Calves, Individually and as husband and wife and Caridad Calves, a single woman, Appellees.

No. 77-1773.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 21, 1978.

*202Weinstein & Bavly and Arthur J. Mor-burger, Miami, for appellant.

Wolfson, Appel & Maram and Anthony J. Brown, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded with directions to dismiss the action herein for lack of prosecution under Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.420(e) based on the following authorities: *Bake-well v. Shepard,*310 So.2d 765 (Fla.2d DCA 1975); *Castle v. Struhl,*293 So.2d 798 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); *Wells v. Van Arnam,*271 So.2d 186 (Fla.lst DCA 1973).
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1426 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1426

    To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to reauthorize and extend 
provisions relating to contaminant prevention, detection, and response.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 19, 2005

   Mr. Obama introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to reauthorize and extend 
provisions relating to contaminant prevention, detection, and response.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Drinking Water Security Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. CONTAMINANT PREVENTION, DETECTION, AND RESPONSE.

    Section 1434 of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300i-3) is 
amended by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 
of the Drinking Water Security Act of 2005, the Administrator shall 
submit to Congress a report that includes--
            ``(1) a description of the progress made as of that date in 
        implementing this section;
            ``(2) a description of any impediments to that 
        implementation identified by the Administrator, including--
                    ``(A) difficulty in coordinating the implementation 
                with other Federal, State, or local agencies or 
                organizations;
                    ``(B) insufficient funding for effective 
                implementation;
                    ``(C) a lack of authorization to take certain 
                actions (including the authority to hire necessary 
                personnel) required to carry out the implementation; 
                and
                    ``(D) technological impediments to developing the 
                methods, means, and equipment specified in subsection 
                (a)(1).
    ``(c) Implementation Plan.--The Administrator shall develop, and 
carry out during the period of fiscal years 2006 through 2010, an 
implementation plan with respect to actions described in subsection (a) 
that--
            ``(1) is consistent with actions taken under that 
        subsection as of the date on which the implementation plan is 
        finalized; and
            ``(2) reflects the findings of the report submitted under 
        subsection (b).
    ``(d) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out 
this section $7,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 through 2010.''.
                                 <all>
```
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1542 

To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to create a Chief Trade Prosecutor to 

ensure compliance with trade agreements, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 28, 2005 

Ms. STABENOW (for herself, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. BAYH, Mr. BAUCUS, and Mr. 

LEVIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to create a Chief Trade 

Prosecutor to ensure compliance with trade agreements, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF POSITION OF CHIEF 

4 TRADE PROSECUTOR. 

5 (a) ESTABLISHMENT OF POSITION.—Section 

6 141(b)(2) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 

7 2171(b)(2)) is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(2) There shall be in the Office 3 Deputy 

9 United States Trade Representatives, 1 Chief Agri-
2 

•S 1542 IS

1 culture Negotiator, and 1 Chief Trade Prosecutor. 

2 The 3 Deputy United States Trade Representatives, 

3 the Chief Agriculture Negotiator, and the Chief 

4 Trade Prosecutor shall be appointed by the Presi5 dent, by and with the advice and consent of the Sen6 ate. As an exercise of the rulemaking of the Senate, 

7 any nomination of a Deputy United States Trade 

8 Representative, the Chief Agricultural Negotiator, or 

9 the Chief Trade Prosecutor submitted to the Senate 

10 for its advice and consent, and referred to a com11 mittee, shall be referred to the Committee on Fi12 nance. Each Deputy United States Trade Represent13 ative, the Chief Agricultural Negotiator, and the 

14 Chief Trade Prosecutor shall hold office at the pleas15 ure of the President and shall have the rank of Am16 bassador.’’. 

17 (b) FUNCTIONS OF POSITION.—Section 141(c) of the 

18 Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2171(c)) is amended by 

19 adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

20 ‘‘(6) The principal function of the Chief Trade 

21 Prosecutor shall be to ensure that United States 

22 trading partners comply with trade agreements to 

23 which the United States is a party. The Chief Trade 

24 Prosecutor shall assist the United States Trade Rep25 resentative in investigating and prosecuting disputes 
3 

•S 1542 IS

1 before the World Trade Organization, and pursuant 

2 to other trade agreements to which the United 

3 States is a party, and shall assist the United States 

4 Trade Representative in carrying out the Trade 

5 Representative’s functions under subsection (d). The 

6 Chief Trade Prosecutor shall make recommendations 

7 with respect to the administration of United States 

8 trade laws relating to foreign government barriers to 

9 United States goods, services, intellectual property, 

10 and other trade matters. The Chief Trade Pros11 ecutor shall perform such other functions as the 

12 United States Trade Representative may direct.’’. 

13 (c) COMPENSATION.—Section 5314 of title 5, United 

14 States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘Chief Trade Pros15 ecutor’’ as a new item after ‘‘Negotiator’’. 

Æ
Office of Highway Safety

Human Performance

Deborah Bruce, PhD

Driving Experience
        - Part-time driver since 2001
        - No traffic violations
        - School bus driver 2000-2005
        - Excellent pre-employment reference
        - One past motorcoach accident 
        - Third trip to Florida for Bluffton

Driver’s Work/Rest Schedule
        - Off-duty 12-day period 
        - March 1st on-duty 10.5 hours
        - Arrived in Adairsville, GA, at 7:37 p.m.
        - Began driving at 4:30 a.m. March 2nd
        - Opportunity for 7 hours of sleep 
        - Driving an hour before accident

Fatigue-Related Accident Factors
        - Duration of last sleep
        - Total sleep in past 24 hours
        - Split sleep/work pattern

Driver Medical Information
        - Expired medical certificate
        - Recent visit to primary care physician,   but did not get medical exam
        - Risk factors for obstructive sleep apnea, but had never been tested
        - Not impaired by alcohol, illicit drugs,   or narcotic pain medication

Accident Trip
        - Traveling in HOV lane at est. 65 mph
        - Not using telephone or CB radio
        - Road conditions were dry
        - It was dark at 5:38 a.m. 
        - Roadway lighting met current design standards
        - Headlights were likely on low beam

Driver Expectancy
        - Driver expected I-75 HOV lane to diverge to the left
        - The driver did not expect a left interstate exit
        - Primary lane following cues were
        -    yellow edge line marker on the left
        -    double white line on the right
        -    repeated diamond road markers

Route Following Mistake

Failure to Stop

Factors Affecting 

Perception-Reaction Time:
        - Low contrast – nighttime conditions
        - Older age
        - Object size
        - Driver expectancy
        - Visual complexity
        - Driver experience/familiarity

Driver Error
        - Route following mistake takes him up the exit ramp
        - Failure to decrease speed ignores road elevation cues
        - Failure to stop even with STOP AHEAD signs

# UNKNOWN-0.unknown
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42973]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21076]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-435-000]


Southern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Filing

August 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 31, 1997, Southern Natural Gas Company 
(Southern) submitted a filing pursuant to the Commission's Order dated 
August 30, 1995 in Docket No. RP95-404-000. In the Order the Commission 
directed Southern to file not later than three months prior to the 
second anniversary of the effective date of the continuation of its 
pricing differential mechanism (PDM) for recovery of gas supply 
realignment costs. The second anniversary of the continuation date of 
Southern's PDM will be November 1, 1997, and Southern anticipates that 
it will be unable to obtain reformation of all of its gas supply 
contracts prior to that date. Accordingly, Southern made this filing in 
support of a two-year continuation of its PDM.
    Southern states that copies of the filing were served upon 
Southern's shippers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests should be filed on 
or before August 12, 1997. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
Southern's filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21076 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### STATE of Louisiana v. James Curtis WALKER.

No. 60506.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 27, 1977.

Michael S. Wolf, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ossie Brown, Dist. Atty., Richard E. Chaffin, Marilyn C. Castle, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# L_2023132EN.01008701.xml

| 17.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 132/87 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 132/87

---

DECISION (EU) 2023/976 OF THE SINGLE RESOLUTION BOARD

of 22 March 2023

on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget and on the closure of the accounts of the Single Resolution Board (‘SRB’) for the financial year 2021 (SRB/PS/2023/02)

(Only the English text is authentic)

THE SINGLE RESOLUTION BOARD,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (1), and in particular, Articles 50(1)(b) and 63(8) of the SRM Regulation,

Having regard to Articles 97, 98 and 99 of the SRB Financial Regulation of 17 January 2020,

Having regard to the Final Annual Accounts of the SRB for the financial year 2021 as adopted on 29 June 2022 (the ‘2021 Final Annual Accounts’),

Having regard to the Annual Report of the SRB for the financial year 2021 as adopted on 30 May 2022 (the ‘2021 Annual Report’),

Having regard to the European Court of Auditors’ Report on the annual accounts of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) for the financial year 2021, together with the SRB’s replies (the ‘2021 Court of Auditors’ Annual Report’),

Having regard to the Report on the 2021 Final Annual Accounts including audit opinions dated 17 June 2022 prepared by Mazars Réviseurs d’Enterprises (the ‘Mazars 2021 Audit Report’),

Having regard to the European Court of Auditors’ Report (pursuant to Article 92(4) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014) on any contingent liabilities arising as a result of the performance by the Single Resolution Board, the Council or the Commission of their tasks under the SRM Regulation for the financial year 2021 (the ‘Court of Auditors’ Contingent Liabilities Report 2021’),

Having regard to the Internal Audit Annual Report 2021 dated 15 January 2022,

Having regard to the 2021 SRB Work Programme,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Sole Article

1.   Grant the Chair of the Single Resolution Board discharge in respect of the implementation of the SRB’s budget for the financial year 2021;

2.   Approve the closure of the accounts of the SRB for the financial year 2021;

3.   Set out its observations in the motion below;

4.   Instruct the Chair of the Single Resolution Board to notify this Decision to the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series), and on the website of the SRB.

This Decision enters into force on the date of its signature.

For the Single Resolution Board,

Jan Marc BERK

Plenary Member

---

(1)  
  OJ L 225, 30.7.2014, p. 1.

1

---
### CERTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 40 CFRPart 51, Appendix V, 2.1(g)®

I hereby certify that: Thomas S. Burack, Commissioner CERTIFICATIONOF PUBLIC PROCESS In accordance with N

.H . Admin. Rule Env-A 204.01(b) and 40 CFR § 51 .102, public notice was given that the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, Air Resources Division (DES), intended to submit for the approval of the U .S . Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revisions to the New Hampshire State Implementation Plan (SIP) which added and amended Env-A 1500 : Conformity. The existing rule establishes requirements for a consultative process relative to conformity determinations . The proposed rule readopts Env-A 1500 with minor edits and clarifications. A public hearing on the Rules and the SIP revision was held on July 26, 2011 at 10:00 a.m ., at DES, Rooms 110 and 111, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH . Opportunity was provided to receive oral comments during the hearing, and written comments at any time from June 24, 2011, up to 4:00 p.m . on Friday, August 5, 2011, for consideration by the DES in making a final decision. Since no members of the public appeared for the hearing, no record ofthe public hearing was made on tape. Acopy of the SIP revision was available for public inspection at the DES offices at 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NHduring regular working hours from8:00 a.m . to 4 :00 p.m ., Monday through Friday, throughout the comment period. The SIP revision was also available for downloading fromthe DES website at : http://des .nh. ov/organization/commissioner/legal/rulemaking /index .htm

. The notice was published in the Union Leader, a newspaper of general, statewide circulation, on Friday, June 24, 2011, more than thirty days prior to the date of the hearing . The above statements are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. Robert R . Scott Director, Air Resources Division I 2- pe-GG /

j Date The State of New

Hampshire DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

DES Web site : www

.des.nh.gov P .O . Box 95, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03302-0095 Telephone: (603) 271-1370 " Fax: (603) 271-1381 " TDDAccess: Relay NH 1-800-735-2964
FAA Home
Airports
Resources
Series 150 Advisory Circulars (ACs) for Airport Projects

# AC 120-49 - Certification of Air Carriers (Cancelled)

- ShareShare
- 

- Facebook					Share on Facebook
- Twitter					Tweet on Twitter

## Document Information

- Number
- 120-49
- Title
- Certification of Air Carriers
- Date cancelled
- 2018-07-05
- Cancellation notes
- AC 120-49A
- Date issued
- 1988-11-23
- Office of Primary Responsibility
- AFS-200
- Description
-  	Provides information and guidance material on the certification process of air carriers under FAR Part 121 and Part 135. It provides information that can be used by applicants who desire to be certificated as an air carrier in accordance with FAR Part 121 and Part 135. 
- Content
-    -  AC 120-49  (PDF) 

## View All

      - Current Series 150 ACs
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs
      - Draft Series 150 ACs
      - Advisory Circulars

## Export All

      - Current Series 150 ACs  (CSV)
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs  (CSV)

## Top Requests

      - AC 150/5300-13B, Airport Design
      - AC 150/5320-6G, Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation
      - AC 150/5370-10H, Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports
      - AC 150/5340-1M, Standards for Airport Markings
      - AC 150/5340-30J, Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual Aids
      - AC 150/5390-2C, Heliport Design
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 4458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2249]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Parts 220 and 352


Third Party Collection Program and Comptroller of the Department 
of Defense Organizational Chart; Removal

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document removes the Department of Defense's Third Party 
Collection (TPC) Program and the organizational charter on the 
Comptroller of the Department of Defense codified in the CFR. The parts 
have served the purpose for which they were intended and are no longer 
necessary in the CFR.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 30, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
L. Bynum or P. Toppings, 703-697-4111.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DoD Instruction 6010.15, ``Third Party 
Collection (TPC) Program'' (32 CFR part 220) was replaced by DoD 
Instruction 6015.23. DoD Directive 5118.3, ``Comptroller of the 
Department of Defense (C, DoD)'' (32 CFR part 352) was revised by a 
January 6, 1997 version. Copies of the DoD Instruction 6015.23 and DoD 
Directive 5118.3 may be obtained from the National Technical 
Information Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 
22161.

List of Subjects

32 CFR Part 220

    Claims, Health care, Health insurance, Military personnel.

32 CFR Part 352

    Organization and functions.

PARTS 220 AND 352--[REMOVED]

    Accordingly, by the authority of 10 U.S.C. 301, 32 CFR parts 220 
and 352 are removed.

    Dated: January 24, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-2249 Filed 1-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1508 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1508

  To require Senate candidates to file designations, statements, and 
                      reports in electronic form.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 27, 2005

Mr. Feingold (for himself, Mr. McCain, and Mr. Cochran) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                        Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require Senate candidates to file designations, statements, and 
                      reports in electronic form.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Senate Campaign Disclosure Parity 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SENATE CANDIDATES REQUIRED TO FILE ELECTION REPORTS IN 
              ELECTRONIC FORM.

    (a) In General.--Section 304(a)(11)(D) of the Federal Election 
Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 434(a)(11)(D)) is amended to read as 
follows:
                    ``(D) As used in this paragraph, the terms 
                `designation', `statement', or `report' mean a 
                designation, statement or report, respectively, which--
                            ``(i) is required by this Act to be filed 
                        with the Commission, or
                            ``(ii) is required under section 302(g) to 
                        be filed with the Secretary of the Senate and 
                        forwarded by the Secretary to the 
                        Commission.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 302(g)(2) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 432(g)(2)) is 
        amended by inserting ``or 1 working day in the case of a 
        designation, statement, or report filed electronically'' after 
        ``2 working days''.
            (2) Section 304(a)(11)(B) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 
        434(a)(11)(B)) is amended by inserting ``or filed with the 
        Secretary of the Senate under section 302(g)(1) and forwarded 
        to the Commission'' after ``Act''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to any designation, statement, or report required to be filed 
after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```