alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

Certification of President



I, Ramon Chimelis, president, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Big Sky Industries II, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: January 6, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President
#### Betty CHANCE, Individually and as Trustee, Appellant, v. Alton Raymond CHANCE, Individually and as Trustee, Appellee.

No. II-185.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 13, 1978.

John Peter Kirtz, Jr., Pensacola, for appellant.

Joseph Q. Tarbuck, Pensacola, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order granting motion for judgment on pleadings in an action where appellant alleged that appellee had violated the terms of a trust agreement executed by the parties.

Appellant and . appellee, formerly married, are co-trustees of a trust of family property, both real and personal. Appellant’s complaint alleged that appellee had violated the terms of the trust agreement by (1) not re-investing or dividing equally with appellant net income from investment of trust property, (2) not paying alimony and child support from farming income, (3) not reinvesting or dividing equally income obtained from selling or renting property in the trust corpus, (4) not providing an annual accounting, (5) not paying fire insurance premiums on the home appellant lived in, and (6) selling trust property without appellant’s written consent. Appellee denied all but three of the allegations. He admitted he had refused an accounting, stating that none was necessary as there had never been any trust income; he admitted not paying fire insurance premiums but denied that such was his obligation. He denied not paying alimony and child support.

Upon review of the allegations contained in appellant’s complaint and those in appellee’s answer, we conclude that the lower court erred in granting appellee’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. The test to be applied in determining the propriety of granting a motion for judgment on the pleadings is the same as if the defendant moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state the cause of action. *Butts v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.,*207 So.2d 73 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968). Moreover, before granting such motion, the court may not consider matters outside the pleadings. *Miller v. Eatmon,*177 So.2d 523 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965).

Accordingly the order is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
#### Floyd E. TUBBS v. LOUISIANA POWER AND LIGHT CO.

No. 60901.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1977.

In re: Floyd E. Tubbs applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Winn. 349 So.2d 994.

Writ denied.
# Shred event scheduled Nov. 8 on DSCR

/ Published Nov. 6, 2017
Richmond, Virginia, 
Mark your calendars for the upcoming shred event coming Nov. 8 to Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. The event is open to all Department of Defense identification cardholders. The Bellwood Shred event that will take place from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. at the Outdoor Recreation Building 24 parking lot located on 8th street.

This event is sponsored by Defense Logistics Agency Installation Operations at Richmond’s Morale, Welfare and Recreation Office to provide a safe venue to shred and dispose of loose paper, personal bills and documents. This event helps people get rid of paper waste that may contain sensitive information.The service is free. We will be disposing **paper only**. No binders, staples or items that have paperclips.

For more information, see the Richmond MWR webpage, or email Lamar.m.denno@dla.mil.
# Red River’s Merrell retires with almost 51 years of federal service

/ Published Feb. 22, 2017
TEXARKANA, Texas, Shirley Merrell, a supply system analyst with DLA Distribution Red River, Texas, recently retired with nearly 51 years of federal service.
Merrell, who began her federal career out of high school, joined DLA when the organization took over the supply function at Red River Army Depot.

Beginning her career as a wage grade employee, Merrell moved throughout many different supply positions with installation host Red River Army Depot.  Upon joining DLA in 1991, Merrell held the position of lead supply technician until transitioning to her current duties as supply systems analyst in August 2009.

During her nearly 51-year career, Merrell has seen many transformations. She called the transformation in technologies the highlight of her career.  

“I was in supply when the system went to the Storage and Distribution System, and then I saw the change from SDS to Distribution Standard System,” Merrell said. “I served on the cadre team for DSS implementation and testing at our distribution center. I did the training of inventory counts for the workforce both on the regular computer as well as the handheld.”

With technology evolving throughout her career, Merrell said, the key to her success has been learning her job well. This not only leads to customer satisfaction, but also to personal job satisfaction, she said. 

Merrell credits her time on the DLA Distribution expeditionary team as an experience for which she is thankful.  “I’ve had the opportunity to travel to places I probably would not have gone to on my own, both within the United States as well as abroad.”  

Overall, Merrell says she is very thankful for her career with the federal government.  “I am very fortunate to have worked for the Army and DLA.  The experience has allowed me to raise a family, and surround myself with hard workers, dedicated to serving the warfighter.”

In conclusion, Merrell would like everyone to know, “Over the years I have worked with and met people from all over the world. It has been an experience I will never forget and has made me a better person for knowing and working with them.”
No. 00-7076.

#### Ramos-Pacheco *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

STEPHANIE and ALEXANDER

ABBOTT, individually, and as 

personal representatives of the Estate 

of their minor daughter, M.P.A.,

Plaintiffs Below, Appellants,

v.

DEDICATED TO WOMEN 

OB/GYN, P.A. and BAYHEALTH 

MEDICAL CENTER, INC.,

Defendants Below, Appellees.

§

§ No. 19, 2024

§ 

§ Court Below–Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ C.A No. N20C-05-175

§ 

§ 

§

§

§

§

§ 

Submitted: September 25, 2024

Decided: October 3, 2024

Before VALIHURA, LEGROW, and GRIFFITHS, Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we 

find it evident that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of and for 

the reasons stated in the Superior Court’s opinion and order denying appellants’

motion for a new trial dated January 2, 2024.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ N. Christopher Griffiths

Justice
exv10w3



 






Exhibit 10.3








August 2, 2007



Red Trail Energy




     Re: Transfer of RPMG LLC Business to Wholly-Owned Subsidiary 


Dear Mick Miller:



For business and tax reasons, Renewable Products Marketing Group, LLC (“RPMG”), has
determined that it is necessary to transfer substantially all of its assets and
liabilities to a wholly-owned subsidiary. To that end we formed RPMG, Inc. and
effective October 1,2007, we will be transferring all our business to that entity,
including our Marketing Agreement with you. RPMG, Inc. will be wholly owned by RPMG.
This step is being taken on the advice of our accountants and counsel and in no way
will affect our relationship with you or change our obligations to you under the
contract. However, our contract with you requires that you consent to the assignment.
Accordingly, we are asking you to sign and return the enclosed copy of this letter
confirming your consent to the assignment of your contract.



If you have any questions, please call Jennifer Seurer at 952-873-2420 ext. 34.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,

Renewable Products Marketing Group, LLC

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Randy Hahn
 	 
	 	 	Randy Hahn, CEO 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 


We hereby consent to the assignment described
above.



Dated this 31 day of August, 2007




	 	 	 	 	 
	Red Trail Energy

 	 
	By:  	/s/ Mick J. Miller
 	 
	 	An Authorized Officer
#### Carlton HARRISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. L-229.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Aug. 26, 1969.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
#### Mary Helen GILES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. EE-443.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 26, 1977.

Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, and Theodore E. Mack, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Patti Englander, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant pled guilty to a charge of uttering a forged instrument and was placed on probation for five years with adjudication of guilt withheld. Subsequently, she was charged with violation of probation, entered a plea of no contest, and her probation was modified. Thereafter, appellant was again charged with violation of probation by uttering a forged instrument and pled no contest to the violation and pled guilty to the charge of uttering a forged instrument. Her probation was revoked and she was adjudicated guilty of both uttering offenses and was sentenced on each offense to serve five years imprisonment, six months of which was to be served in the county jail after which she was to be placed on probation for three years. The sentences were to run concurrently. She was given credit for all jail time previously served though the amount thereof was not specified. Later, appellant was again charged with violation of her probation by uttering a forged instrument and she again pled guilty to the probation violation and to the substantive crime. She had previously been adjudged guilty of the crimes for which she was serving probation, and the court adjudged her guilty of the new offense of uttering a forged instrument and then sentenced, her to five-year concurrent sentences in the state penitentiary with credit for 40 days jail time previously served. Appellant contends here that the trial court erred in not giving her credit for six months that she served previously on the split sentence citing *State v. Jones,*327 So.2d 18 (Fla.1976). The record before this Court, however, does not show whether appellant served a part or all of the six months split sentence. Also, it does not appear that appellant raised this question in the trial court.

The judgment and sentence are affirmed without prejudice to appellant to test the legality of the sentence by filing in the trial court a motion under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.

McCORD, C. J., and SMITH and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 143 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 143

 To ensure that Members of Congress do not receive better prescription 
               drug benefits than medicare beneficiaries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2005

  Mr. Dayton introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To ensure that Members of Congress do not receive better prescription 
               drug benefits than medicare beneficiaries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Taste of Our Own Medicine Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON PRESCRIPTION DRUG BENEFITS OF MEMBERS OF 
              CONGRESS.

    (a) Limitation on Benefits.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, the actuarial value of the prescription drug benefits of any 
Member of Congress enrolled in a health benefits plan under chapter 89 
of title 5, United States Code, may not exceed the actuarial value of 
basic prescription drug coverage (as defined in section 1860D-2(a)(3) 
of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-102(a)(3)), as added by 
section 101(a) of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and 
Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173; 117 Stat. 2071)).
    (b) Regulations.--The Director of the Office of Personnel 
Management shall promulgate regulations to carry out this section.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report included in the Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-52168, 33-69322, 33-71450,
33-89072, 333-02115, 333-10349, 333-16531, 333-16015, 333-30279, 333-30281,
333-45079, 333-45095, 333-45083, 333-62609, 333-62613, 333-36901, 333-85393,
333-85389, 333-85919, 333-44374, 333-44368, 333-62174, 333-62926, 333-60482 and
333-68204) and Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-10455, 333-10459, and 333-44380).

Jackson, Mississippi,
March 7, 2002
PRESS RELEASE


Contact: David J. O'Connor
         Chief Executive Officer
         New England Bancshares, Inc.
         (860) 253-5200

              NEW ENGLAND BANCSHARES, INC. ANNOUNCES CASH DIVIDEND

      Enfield,  Connecticut - November 13, 2007.  New England  Bancshares,  Inc.
(Nasdaq GM: NEBS) announced today that the Company's Board of Directors declared
a cash dividend for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 of $0.03 per share. The
cash dividend will be payable on December 17, 2007 to  stockholders of record on
November 30, 2007.

      New England Bancshares, Inc. is headquartered in Enfield, Connecticut, and
operates Enfield Federal Savings and Loan Association with eight banking centers
servicing  the  communities  of Enfield,  Manchester,  Suffield,  East  Windsor,
Ellington  and Windsor Locks and Valley Bank with four banking  centers  serving
the communities of Bristol,  Terryville and  Southington.  For more  information
regarding    Enfield   Federal's    products   and   services,    please   visit
www.enfieldfederal.com and for more information regarding Valley Bank's products
and services, please visit www.valleybankct.com.
# Groundbreaking marks start of Troop Support HQs construction

/ Published June 27, 2017
PHILADELPHIA, 

A ceremonial groundbreaking officially began the construction of a new headquarters facility for the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support June 26.

The ceremony was held in front of the current headquarters, across the street from the fenced-in construction zone where work began two weeks prior. A few minutes before the ceremony, an excavator maneuvered around mounds of dirt on flattened ground of what used to be a parking lot. 

DLA Troop Support has been a part of Naval Support Activity Philadelphia for over five decades, Army Brig. Gen. Charles Hamilton, DLA Troop Support commander, said. The new construction reflects the evolution of the organization, from depot operations to procuring more than $14 billion worth of materiel for the military and other customers in 2016. 

Construction on the four-story headquarters is expected to be complete in the summer of 2019. The contract for the $47 million project was awarded to Philadelphia-area firm Daniel J. Keating Company. The building will be Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design certified. 

“The project impacts everyone on base,” Navy Capt. Rudy Geisler, NSA Mechanicsburg-Philadelphia commander, said. He also thanked those who worked behind the scenes to get the necessary permits and helped ensure the project got started.

Representatives of two local politicians attended the ceremony: Anthony Luker, from the office of Congressman Brendan Boyle; and Andrew Dalzell, who represented Pennsylvania state Representative Jared Solomon. 

“The efforts of DLA Troop Support are pivotal to the success of our military,” said Luker. “It’s an honor to host your operations here in Philadelphia.”

Visit the DLA Troop Support website for updates on the project.
No. 9572.

#### The Anchor Fire Insurance Co. *v.*Burrell.

(Decided March 27, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Lorain county.

*Mr. F. M. Dotson; Mr. L. B. Fcmver*and *Mr. J. M. Sheets,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Chamberlain ds Hamlin,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur
No. 00-6930.

#### Cooper *v.*Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# L_2023134EN.01002501.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 134/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 134/25

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/978

of 12 May 2023

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Grebbestadostron’ (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Sweden’s application to register the name ‘Grebbestadostron’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Sweden’s application to register the name ‘Grebbestadostron’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Grebbestadostron’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Grebbestadostron’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Grebbestadostron’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.7. Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 May 2023.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 34, 30.1.2023, p. 33.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---