alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         578,772
<SECURITIES>                                 2,303,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,107
<ALLOWANCES>                                    46,237
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,911,583
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,913,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          289,273
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,879
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,609,342
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,913,494
<SALES>                                        512,688
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               553,023
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,081,568
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,548
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,528,545)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,300)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,531,845)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.03)
        

</TABLE>
Order filed September 12, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00652

- CR

____________ MONZELLE LAVAN STEPT OE , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 149th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 58852



### ORDER
This appeal is from an order signed July 29, 2019 . The notice of appeal was filed August 26, 2019

. The State has filed a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction. Before reviewing the State’s motion , we must review a portion of the record to determine our jurisdiction. Accordingly, we enter the following order.

The Brazoria County District Clerk is directed to file a partial clerk ’ s record on or before September 27, 2019 , containing (1) the court ’ s order th at is being appealed; (2) any post

-

judgment motion, and the court ’ s order on the motion; and (3) the notice of appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Wise and Hassan.
#### DIXIE PIPELINE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Amilcar J. TROSCLAIR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 2765.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Sept. 16, 1969.

Dissenting Opinion Sept. 19, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 17, 1969.

Writ Refused Jan. 9, 1970.

J. Barry Mouton, Lafayette, for defendant-appellant.

John V. Parker, Baton Rouge, Andrew J. S. Jumonville, of Davidson, Meaux, Onebane and Donohoe, Lafayette, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before FRUGÉ, HOOD and MILLER, JJ-

MILLER, Judge.

This expropriation suit by Dixie Pipeline Company versus Amilcar J. Trosclair is a companion to two other similar suits. See Dixie Pipeline Company v. Barry, 227 So.2d 1 (No. 2764 on our docket), and Dixie Pipeline Company v. Broussard, 227 So.2d 13 (No. 2766 on our docket).

For the reasons assigned in Dixie Pipeline Company v. Marguerite Kidder Barry, supra, the judgment appealed from in the instant suit is amended to award additional damages to Amilcar J. Trosclair in the amount of $744.80 as severance damages related to the taking of the 8-inch pipeline servitude. Defendant is entitled to interest at the rate of S’% per annum from December 18, 1968, until paid. The judgment is otherwise affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed to plaintiff-appellee.

Amended and affirmed.

HOOD, Judge

(dissenting).

For the reasons set out in my dissent in the companion case of Dixie Pipeline Company v. Barry, 227 So.2d 1 (No. 2764 on our docket), I respectfully dissent from that portion of the judgment on rehearing in the instant suit which awards severance damages to the defendant.

On Application for Rehearing.

En Banc. Rehearing denied.

HOOD, J., and SAVOY, J., are of the opinion a rehearing should be granted.
BILL SCHREFFLER
, Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3835

Opinion filed January 20, 2015.

Amended P etition S eeking B elated A ppeal

-- Original Jurisdiction

. Bill Schreffler, pro se , Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General
, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.
To the extent it seeks a belated appeal of the May 2014 order denying
petitioner’s motion for postconviction relief, the amended petition for belated appealfails to articulate any specific facts demonstrating an entitlement to a belated appeal

of that ord er, and is therefore legally insufficient. To the extent the amended petition
seeks a belated appeal of petitioner’s September 2010 judgment and sentence, it is
untimely pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c)(5)(A), and
petitioner has fa iled to allege sufficient facts to avoid that procedural bar.
Accordingly, the petition seeking belated appeal is DENIED.

ROBERTS, RAY, and MAKAR
, JJ., CONCUR.

2
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA welcomes Special Operations Command leaders to the McNamara Headquarters Complex

By Chris Erbe

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

socomspecial operationsSOFSEALsSpecial ForcesRanger RegimentGreen BeretsMARSOCUSASOCJSOCWarfighter First
[LETTERHEAD CIBC MELLON TRUST COMPANY]




March 5, 2007

<table>
<caption>

                                                    <C>
Nova Scotia Securities Commission                      Securities Commission of Newfoundland and Labrador

Alberta Securities Commission                          Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission, Securities Division

The Manitoba Securities Commission                     Office of the Administrator of the Securities Act, New Brunswick

Ontario Securities Commission                          British Columbia Securities Commission

Registrar of Securities, Prince Edward Island          Autorite des marches financiers

Government of the Northwest Territories                Government of Yukon

Government of Nunavut

</table>

Dear Sirs:

RE:      VASOGEN INC.

The following were sent by prepaid mail to all registered shareholders of the
above-mentioned Company on March 5, 2007:

    [X]  Proxy
    [X]  Notice of Meeting/Information Circular
    [X]  MD & A
    [X]  Annual Report for the Fiscal Year Ended November 30, 2006
    [X]  Annual Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended November 30, 2006
    [X]  Supplemental Card

However, we have not mailed to shareholders in cases where on three consecutive
occasions, Notices or other documents have been returned undelivered by the Post
Office.

The above disclosure document(s) are filed with you as agent for the Company in
compliance with the regulations.

Yours very truly,

CIBC MELLON TRUST COMPANY


Trust Central Services

bbCM_Vasogen

     320 Bay Street, P.O. Box 1 o Toronto, ON M5H 4A6 o Tel 416.643.5000 o
                               www.cibcmellon.com

 CIBC Mellon Trust Company is a licensed user of the CIBC and Mellon trademarks
**Exhibit
      21.1**








**ATLANTIC
      BANCGROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY**








**Form
      10-KSB**








For
      Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006








Subsidiary
      of Registrant





Oceanside
      Bank, incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida


1315
      South Third Street, Jacksonville Beach, Florida 32250
# Medical employee maintains cold chain, saves money, earns DOD award

/ Published May 25, 2017
PHILADELPHIA, 
When the Defense Logistics Agency sends vaccines and drugs to military medical facilities, Dana Dallas ensures there are no weak links in the cold chain. 

The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support employee earned the Defense Department’s Packaging Excellence Award in a ceremony in Rockaway, N.J., May 10.

The award recognizes an individual in the DOD packaging community who contributed significantly to improved productivity and efficiency.

As the lead packing analyst and cold chain program manager in Troop Support’s Medical supply chain, Dallas ensures the effectiveness of temperature-sensitive medical material is not compromised as it moves through the supply chain from manufacturer to customer.

A key reason Dallas was selected for the award was her collaboration with the DLA Research and Development Medical Logistics Network program to redesign cold-chain packaging procedures during the hot summer months. The redesign increased productivity while saving the DOD more than $200,000 per year.

Her supervisor, Theresa Rucci, said Dallas constantly exceeds expectation.  

“She is highly regarded by her co-workers and always strives for excellence,” Rucci said. “Her contributions to the team have greatly enhanced the shipment of cold chain material to the warfighter.”

Dallas is regarded as an expert in her field and her work was published in the September 2016 issue of the Cold Chain Global Forum Market Report.

“I’ve been working in this field for about 15 years, so it’s always nice to get recognized, especially at the DOD level,” Dallas said.

The award is co-sponsored by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Logistics and Materiel Readiness and the National Institute of Packaging, Handling and Logistics Engineers.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1361 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to treat drug offenses involving 

crystal meth similarly to drug offenses involving crack cocaine. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 30, 2005 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to treat drug offenses involving crystal meth similarly to drug offenses 

involving crack cocaine.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PENALTIES FOR CRYSTAL METHAMPHET4 AMINE. 

5 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 

6 ‘‘Stop Crystal Meth Act of 2005’’. 

7 (b) AMENDMENTS TO CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES

8 ACT.—Section 401(b)(1) of the Controlled Substances Act 

9 (21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)) is amended— 
2

•S 1361 IS

1 (1) by amending subparagraph (A)(viii) to read 

2 as follows: 

3 ‘‘(viii) 50 grams or more of a mixture or sub4 stance containing a detectable amount of meth5 amphetamine, its salts, isomers, or salts of its iso6 mers;’’; and 

7 (2) by amending subparagraph (B)(viii) to read 

8 as follows: 

9 ‘‘(viii) 5 grams or more of a mixture or sub10 stance containing a detectable amount of meth11 amphetamine, its salts, isomers, or salts of its iso12 mers;’’.

Æ
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



## 136688 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n 

## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices



## v SC: 136688 COA: 284372 Saginaw CC: 76-000565-FY REYNALDO RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 14, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).

s1117 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2008

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 163 (Friday, August 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22304]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[MT-060-1020-00]


Lewistown District Resource Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Lewistown District Office.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Lewistown District Resource Advisory Council will meet 
September 10 and 11, 1997, at the Cotton Wood Inn, on Highway 2 East, 
in Glasgow, Montana.
    The September 10 portion of the session will begin at 7 a.m. with a 
tour of the Bitter Creek Wilderness Study Area in the morning and the 
Missouri/Lonetree Watershed in the afternoon. The council should return 
to Glasgow around 5 p.m.
    The September 11 portion will begin at 8 a.m. at the Cotton Wood 
Inn in Glasgow. The meeting will begin with a review of old business 
including the Lonesome Lake project, the Lewistown District's project 
list, proposed council charter revisions, moisture conditions 
throughout the district, and comments concerning grazing standards and 
guidelines.
    The District Manager will also discuss the recent appointment of 
Mr. Pat Shea as Director of the Bureau of Land Management.
    New council members will be introduced and if necessary, the group 
will address the election of officers and other matters of 
organization.
    The group will hear/consider presentations concerning the Eye of 
the Needle, flooding earlier on the Upper Missouri National Wild and 
Scenic River, the status of the Devil's Kitchen plan amendment, current 
status of the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation's Two Crow acquisition, 
proposed range improvements in the district, the need for a revised 
council mission statement, the status of prairie dogs in the Phillips 
Resource Area, the Judith-Valley-Phillips oil and gas amendment, and 
off-road-vehicle regulation implementation.
    There will be a public comment period at 11:30 a.m. during the 
September 11 meeting.

DATES: September 10 and 11, 1997.

LOCATION: Glasgow, MT.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: District Manager, Lewistown District 
Office, Bureau of Land Management, P.O. Box 1160, Airport Road, 
Lewistown, MT 59457.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public and there 
will be a public comment period as detailed above.

    Dated: August 11, 1997.
David L. Mari,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-22304 Filed 8-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
No. 00-6957.

#### Cipriani *v.*New York.

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N.Y., 3d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22155]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, September 22, 1997.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, D.C. 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-22155 Filed 8-18-97; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
#### Bobby Ray FELCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. GG-187, GG-207.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 30, 1978.

Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender and Theodore E. Mack, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Charles W. Musgrove and Patti Englander, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

BOYER, Judge.

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment of guilt and resulting sentence entered after a plea of nolo contendere to four counts of an information. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in accepting his pleas as to counts two and four when it became apparent that a possible defense to those counts existed. The record reveals that both defendant and his counsel expressly acknowledged that they had discussed possible defenses. The trial judge made a sufficient inquiry into the factual basis of the plea. The record is sufficient to demonstrate waiver of any possible defenses. The record also reveals that the defendant was aware of the possible defense now urged as a basis for reversal. The holdings of *State v. Kendrick,*336 So.2d 353 (Fla.1976) and *State v. Lyles,*316 So.2d 277 (Fla.1975) are inapplicable to the facts of this case to which we find apropos the rationale of our sister court of the Third District in *Mathis v. State,*348 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1977).

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J. and MELVIN, J., concur.
Order entered November 6, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01277-CV

HAROLD HASWELL, Appellant

V.

CACH, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 004-01615-2016

ORDER

This appeal was abated April 11, 2017 due to bankruptcy. Asserting the bankruptcy has 

been discharged, appellee has filed a motion to reinstate the appeal and dismiss. 

We GRANT the motion to the extent we REINSTATE the appeal. As to the portion of 

the motion seeking dismissal, we DENY the motion. In denying the request to dismiss, we note

appellee brought the motion pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2)(B). That 

rule allows the Court, in accordance with an agreement signed by the parties or their attorneys, to 

set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial 

court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(2)(B). Appellee’s motion, however was signed only by his counsel.
By letter dated October 14, 2019, we informed appellee that appellant’s signature was 

required and allowed him an opportunity to file an amended motion complying with the rule. To 

date, an amended motion has not been filed.

At the time the appeal was abated, appellant’s brief had been filed and appellee’s brief 

was due to be filed. Accordingly, we ORDER appellee to file its brief no later than December 6, 

2019. 

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
#### LOSAL CORPORATION, Appellant, v. BAYVIEW ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellee.

No. 77-1573.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 30, 1978.

Herbert A. Warren, Miami, for appellant.

Joel I. Keiler, Miami, for appellee.

*33Before HUBBART and KEHOE, JJ., and PARKER, J. GWYNN (Ret.) Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff Losal Corporation appeals an adverse final summary judgment in an action for specific performance, declaratory judgment, injunctive and other relief filed against its landlord, the defendant Bayview Associates, Inc., as the owner and operator of the Dupont Plaza Hotel in Miami, Florida. The plaintiff was locked out of his leased commercial premises at the Dupont Plaza Hotel by the defendant because the plaintiff allegedly breached a material provision of the applicable lease agreement between the parties providing that the lessee plaintiff could not sell products “in competition with existing tenants” at the hotel.

Our review of the record reveals that summary judgment was improperly granted by the trial court because there were genuine issues of material fact as to (1) whether the lease agreement between the parties prohibiting the lessee plaintiff from selling “products in competition with other tenants” refers to products in the same generic classification or more narrowly to products which are identical, and (2) whether the plaintiff did in fact sell such products as thus prohibited by the lease. *Holl v. Talcott,*191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966). See *Storz Broadcasting Co. v. Courtney,*178 So.2d 40 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965); *Norwood Shopping Center, Inc. v. MKR Corp.,*135 So.2d 448 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961).

The judgment appealed from is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Exhibit 32.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Jagged Peak, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the 13-week period ended March 31, 2006, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 10, 2006
|                   | 
|By:                |  | /s/ Andrew J. Norstrud 
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 01, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 01, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0564. LORENZO FOREHAND v. BEMON MCBRIDE et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 19283