alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EX 3.10(z)

[MICROFLUIDICS LETTERHEAD APPEARS HERE]

                                                 December 31, 1998

Irwin Gruverman 
16 Tanglewood Road
Needham,  MA  02194

Dear Mr. Gruverman:

This will confirm our Agreement concerning your compensation as
chairman and CEO of MFIC.

Subject to approval by the board, we will pay you at a base rate of
$95,000 per year, beginning January 1, 1999, subject to reductions
and other changes imposed on executives at the December 21, 1998
board meeting ($76,000 on 1/1/99).  You will participate in a bonus
pool,  if any,  for management employees.  You agree that MFIC will
withhold money from your compensation to pay appropriate taxes.  You
will be included in MFIC's insurance and medical programs as in
past years, at no cost to you,  as part of your compensation.


MICROFLUIDICS INTERNATIONAL, INC.


/s/ Michael A Lento                                     /s/  Irwin Gruverman
-------------------------------                         ------------------------
Michael A Lento, President                              Irwin Gruverman
                                                        for myself

/s/ Irwin Gruverman
-------------------------------
Irwin Gruverman, CEO, Chairman


[MICROFLUIDICS LETTERHEAD APPEARS HERE]
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 153 (Friday, August 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42771-42772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21008]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3416-000]


Global Energy and Technology, Inc.; Notice Of Issuance Of Order

August 5, 1997.
    Global Energy and Technology, Inc. (Global Energy) submitted for 
filing a rate schedule under which Global Energy will engage in 
wholesale electric power and energy transactions as a marketer. Global 
Energy also requested waiver of various Commission regulations. In 
particular, Global Energy requested that the Commission grant blanket 
approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and 
assumptions of liability by Global Energy.
    On August 1, 1997, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Applications, Office of Electric Power Regulation, granted 
requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Global Energy should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 
211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Global Energy is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, endorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Global Energy's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.

[[Page 42772]]

    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is September 2, 1997. Copies 
of the full text of the order are available from the Commission's 
Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21008 Filed 8-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), the undersigned officer of Immunomedics. Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 13, 2007                                                          
|                                                                                   
|/s/ GERARD G. GORMAN                                                               
|Gerard G. Gorman                                                                   
|Senior Vice President, Finance and Business Development and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135602 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 135602 

 COA: 271085

 Wayne CC: 05-007340-01 
 TOMAS FELICIANO, a/k/a NELSON 

FELICIANO and THOMAS FELICIANO, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 20, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0317 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 24, 2008 

 Clerk
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50692

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARTIN ESTRADA-RUEDA

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-97-CR-46

- - - - - - - - - -

February 10, 1998

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Martin Estrada-Rueda appeals his sentence following a guilty

plea for reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326. Estrada-Rueda argues that he was charged with and

pleaded guilty to simple reentry following deportation under

§ 1326(a) and that he could not be sentenced under § 1326(b)

because the indictment did not allege that he had a prior

aggravated-felony conviction. His argument is foreclosed by this

court’s decision in United States v. Vasquez-Olvera, 999 F.2d

943, 945-47 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of 1mage Software, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
         operations of the Company.


/s/ David R. DeYoung
------------------------------------------------
David R. DeYoung
President, Principal and Chief Executive Officer

April 15, 2005


/s/ Mary Anne DeYoung
-------------------------------------------------------
Mary Anne DeYoung
Vice President, Finance and Principal Financial Officer

April 15, 2005


                                       53
**Exhibit
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China
      Natural Gas , Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ending March 31, 2008as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Qinan
      Ji ,
      Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
            The
                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Dated:
                May 19, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Qinan JiChief
                Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Report of Cintas Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending May 31, 2009 (the "Report"), I, William C. Gale, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|              |  |                                                            
|------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/           |  | William C. Gale
William C. Gale
Principal Financial Officer
|July 30, 2009

77

---
Z\fl^~°

C^^.e/VA#^QO-/0. ..H^-IS. bSZPm

AvJ/eio. ft row >v.tdo# \k i?o? 7

Co FFi'e/ d.KttfkJU£I FM XO6ij iTetv/VeSSex £olam^XK. %:.*t&& kj

£ Tha.M ky.o (a. . QxhjuJ kh^z^^—, _,.

ML£>a>. £/../. e, , ••_.. ....

XojDJuCjc>j&.&1^0S-C££^

JLJiotA&<pJLdl£Jttex^^ f

/tffsz.Mason mDle.c idheMi- To groAiZ/^AeS Hospital

7W gfre ReeA,<tex*V.A<n.l*4 Vhcn T^iT0FCR,fWIMALAPPEALS.

-#-

i boK f/er TnS&tuA/'J'P/uin Tx 7bge4. Am ^2015

Z&MiAlfUM ^semiJ^c^ochiii^^A^^

IhfLte>JOos£> ^6_fe^e^f_iCj^LQi^air^_^o_/)/^

?AJ/M9s$\/0S/Me.r ?A/ SomAnAviuVq kJhe/ jm?&

:UjJLf_tOa£ T^eo^^^^£±Q£j^t^^xa.Lfi^a±,

Case -gAg A3ckS &/03M- ).Jus re- /fy ,3 /V-f^c4i'V<L

£bc/ofe> ?AJ l,JJ<°-TreQ-fMe.A?f Aql.B. 6ftoa-fe_r

£e.xa.L^cc/,4 To (c( Ti? r, a -Def £c4; i/p TAa^

jfeX/>er-ZQocS A).e>.Si$VQ0F/il?C£ AliUi^r /teP/uj

5 ^y^ L^£*digjcL&tt^^
/Ae pnLice. £e/Wf

*(iLE£&LL!^L/iMmh&r^o^

MaJt£g£M&yy&e4^^

KLtie^&&i^&Ly-BodyJI.^

•ti&£sMchjUiLUlik^.

Isa^ui^tMh£jL^^

'£&$^ncdkmQJkij^^

i , . •.

••1L&J£!£JL&^^

*

jJ>£L42^J.^e_C;#>Wi^a>^£^^

tt)^ f\ir> ftA)ft n£/Me Or &/vyThcjjj fl&ou.Jt../kl.B.

jf/eoLS e Loofr (V -to TA?JL /Ate. ^.L^J-Q_S<a,l^-^-yLJ[».LlLeal
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 23, 2009

d0615 

# Order

June 23, 2009

138470

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138470 COA: 279975 Lapeer CC: 06-009059-FH DAVID DUDLEY TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 27, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1

                           INTRAOP MEDICAL CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intraop Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Donald A. Goer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


                                            /s/   Donald A. Goer
                                            -----------------------
                                            Donald A. Goer
                                            Chief Executive Officer

                                            Date:  May 20, 2005
                                                      ---


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Intraop Medical Corporation and will be retained by Intraop Medical
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.


                                       43
#### MISSISSIPPI STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION v. V. T. LYONS et ux.

No. 50015.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

July 20, 1977.

Mauldin & Sneed, Pontotoc, S. H. Long, Tupelo, for appellant.

B. N. Knox, Jr., New Albany, for appel-lee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Union County; W. W. Brown, Judge.

Before PATTERSON, P. J., and SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

GILLESPIE, C. J., took no part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         2,726,486
<SECURITIES>                                  14,272,791
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7,314,977
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              24,314,254
<PP&E>                                           717,675
<DEPRECIATION>                                   473,679
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                49,612,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,155,421
<BONDS>                                                0
<COMMON>                                      52,513,135
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (7,856,851)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  49,612,714
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              22,782,305
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 12,280,767
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              12,280,767
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               10,501,538
<INCOME-TAX>                                     288,410
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           10,213,128
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  10,213,128
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.96
        

</TABLE>
#### Willie J. SMALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1448.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 13, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 9, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, Thomas G. Murray, Asst. Public Defender, and Randolph Ferguson, Legal Intern, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Margarita Esquiroz, Asst. Atty. Gen., and John C. Moppert, Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of *Williams v. State,*110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959); *Ashley v. State,*265 So.2d 685 (Fla.1972); and *Wilson v. State,*330 So.2d 457 (Fla.1976).
Order entered December 20, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00801
- CR THOMAS WILSON, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 283rd Jud icial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F16
- 71680
- T



### O RDER The clerk’s record reflects appellant is indigent and is represented by counsel. T he reporter’s record was due on October 26, 2018. When it was not filed, we notified cou rt reporter Trashuna Salaam by postcard dated October 30, 2018 and instructed her to file, by November 29, 2018, the reporter’s record or written verification that no hearings were recorded or that appellant had not requested the reporter’s record. To date , we have not received the reporter’s record nor have we had any communication from Ms. Salaam.
We ORDER the complete reporter’s record filed BY JANUARY 2, 2019 . We caution Ms. Salaam that the failure to do so will result in the Court taking whatever reme dies it has available to ensure that the appeal proceeds in a timely fashion, which may include ordering that she not sit until the complete reporter’s record is filed.We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Livia Liu Francis,

Pr esiding Judge, 283rd Judicial District Court; Trashuna Salaam, court reporter, 283rd Judicial District Court; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CHAD WINDHAM MITCHELL, Appellant, vs. CARSON CITY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, Respondent. No. 85489



# FILE NOV 10 2022

ORDERDISMISSINGAPPEAL This is a pro se notice of appeal from a district court "order denying pretrial petition for a writ ofhabeas corpus." This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, no appeal lies from an order denying a presentence petition for a writ of habeas corpus.' See NRS 34.724(1) (stating that a person convicted of a crime and under sentence of death or imprisonment may file a postconviction petition for a writ ofhabeas corpus); see also State v. Lewis, 124 Nev. 132, 178 P.3d 146 (2008) (stating that an order entered before judgment of conviction is intermediate and not generally a final, appealable determination), overruled on other grounds by State v. Harris, 131 Nev. 551, 355 P.3d 791 (2015). The right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provides for an appeal, no right to appeal exists. See Castillo v. State, 106

"It appearsthat appellant has not yet been sentencedin district court case number 21-CR002221B.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 434141D, J. Hardesty 

## Ale
. abat..0 Stiglich Herndon J. J. Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133,1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and

ORDERSthis appeal DISMISSED.2

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Chad Windham Mitchell Attorney General/Carson City Carson CityDistrict Attorney Carson City Clerk

2Giventhisorder, thiscourttakesnoaction onthepro semotionsfiled on October 26, 2022, and November 7, 2022.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 1.0) 1947A 434,5 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 7, 2017

t0227

Order 

Clerk

March 7, 2017

153609 (16)

JOSEPH CONSTANT,

Plaintiff,

v SC: 153609

AGC: 1770-15

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November 

18, 2016 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order 

was entered erroneously.
EXHIBIT 10-F-7



December 17, 2004




Mr. Taras R. Proczko

Hartmarx Corporation

101 North Wacker Drive

Chicago, Illinois 60606



|    |  |                                                                                                                                        
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Re: |  | Employment Agreement dated as of August 8, 2004, (the Employment Agreement), by and between Hartmarx Corporation and Taras R. Proczko



Dear Terry:



Reference is made to the Employment Agreement between you, as Executive, and Hartmarx
Corporation (the Company). Hartmarx Corporation has been authorized by the Compensation and Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors to amend the Employment Agreement in certain respects, effective as of the date of this letter,
as set forth below.



1. Section 1 of the Employment Agreement
is hereby amended by deleting the first clause thereof, though the semi-colon ; in line 4, and inserting the following:



The Company hereby employs Executive and Executive hereby agrees to remain in the employ of the Company for an employment term (Agreement
Period) beginning on the date of this Agreement, and continuing in effect through December 31, 2005;



2. Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the same meanings herein as set forth in the Employment Agreement.



3. Except as expressly amended by this letter, the Employment Agreement shall
each remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.



Severance
Agreement requires no revisions as a result of the extension of the Employment Agreement and remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.



---

Mr. Taras R. Proczko

Hartmarx Corporation

December 17, 2004

Page 2



Please sign both copies of this letter where indicated below evidencing your
agreement to this amendment to the Employment Agreement and return one fully executed counterpart to me. When fully executed, this letter will serve as an amendment to the Employment Agreement.



Sincerely,/S/ HOMI B. PATEL




Agreed and Accepted this

17th day of December, 2004



/S/ TARAS R. PROCZKO

---

Taras R. Proczko



HBP