T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). LS/ R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GA RY LOW RY; M ARI AN CAROL, P l ai n t i ffs - A p p el l an t s, v. YA VA P AI C OU NT Y B OA R D O F S U P E R V I S O R S ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 17408 D. C . No . 3 : 0 8 - c v - 0 8 0 2 5 - NV W ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona N e i l V . W a ke , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry11, 2010 ** B efo re: B E E Z E R , T R O T T , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G ary L o w ry an d M ar ian C ar o l ap p ea l p ro se fr o m th e d istrict co u rt’s j ud gm enti n thei r a ct i on al l egi ng vi ol at i on s of thei r r el i gi ou s f re edom ri gh t s und er 

# FI LED JAN 22 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSLS/ R es ear ch 2

f e d e r a l a n d s ta te la w . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n p u r s u a n t to 2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o ag r a n t o f s u m m a ryju d g m e n t. San J os e Chr is t i an C ol l. v . C i t yof Mo r g a n Hill , 360 F . 3d 1024, 1029 ( 9th C i r . 2004) . W e m a ya f f i rm on a nygr ound s u p p o rte d b yth e r e c o r d , i d. a t1 0 3 0 , a n dw e a f f i rm. S um m a ryj udgm e ntw a s pr ope r l ygr a nt e d on pl a i nt i f f s ’ c l a i m s unde rthe R e l i gi ous L a nd U s e a nd I ns t i tut i ona l i z e d P e r s ons A c tof 2000 ( “ R L U I P A ” ) a nd A ri zona l aw because the un di sput ed evi dence es t abl i shes there w as no subst ant i al b u r d e n o n th e ire x e r c is e o f r e lig io n . Se e id. a t1035- 36 ( c onc l udi ng the r e w a s no s u b s ta n tia l b u r d e n o n th e e x e r c is e o f r e lig io n u n d e rR L U I P A w h e r e p a rtyc o u ldf ile appl i ca t i on for z on i ng perm i t ); S ta te v . H a rde s ty , 214 P . 3d 1004, 1007 ( A r i z . 2009) ( e xpl a i ni ng tha t , t o e s t abl i s h avi ol a t i on of A r i z ona ’ s F r e e E xe r c i s e of R e l i gi on A c t , apa rtym us te s t abl i s h, in te ra lia , tha tagove rnm e nt a l a c ts ubs t a nt i a l l ybur de ns th e e x e r c is e o f

r e lig io n ) . S um m a ryj udgm e ntw a s pr ope r l ygr a nt e d on pl a i nt i f f s ’ F i r s tA m e ndm e nt c la im s b e c au s e th e c h a lle n g e d z o n in g la w s a r e n e u tr a l a n dg e n e r a llyap p lic ab le . Se e Sa n J

o s e Ch r is tia n C o ll. , 360 F . 3d a t1030- 32 ( gr a nt i ng s um m a ryj udgm e nt w here the zoni ng l aw w as neutra l and g ener al l y app l i cabl e) . P la in tif f s ’ e q u a l p r o te c tio n c la im s f a il b e c au s e p la in tif

f s h a v e f a ile dto id e n tif yo th e r s w h o w e r e tr e a te d d if f e r e n tlyu n d e rth e o r d in a n c e s . See Chr is t i anLS/ R es ear ch 3

G ospel Chu rc h, Inc. v. C i t

y & C ou nt

y of Sa n Francisc o , 8 9 6 F .2 d1 2 2 1 , 1 2 2 6 ( 9 th C i r . 1 9 9 0 ) ( “ [ An y ] e q u a l p r o t e c t i o n a r g u m e n tr e q u i r e s th e e x i s t e n c e o f a tl e a s ttwo cl as si fi ca t i on s of per sons w hi ch ar e tre at ed di ff er ent l y und erthe l aw . ” ( i nt ernal qu ot at i on m arks and ci t at i on om i tt ed)) . P la in tif f s ’ r e m a in in g c o n te n tio n s la c km e r it. B e c aus e w e a f

f i rm s um m a ryj udgm e nton the m e r i t s , w e do nota ddr e s s the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s i m pos i t i on of t e rm i na t i ng s anc t i ons a s a n a l t e rna t i ve ba s i s f or d is m is s a l. W e l ackj u ri sd i ct i o n t o rev i ew th e d i stri ctco u rt ’ s o rd er d en yi n g p l ai n t i ffs’ m ot i on for r eheari ng because pl ai nt i ff s di d n otfi l e ano t i ce of appeal fr om that o r d e r . See T

A A G L i nh as A er eas de A ng ola v. T ransam er i ca A i rl i nes, Inc. , 915 F .2 d 1 3 5 1 , 1 3 5 4 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 0 ) . AF F I RME D.