alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### A. W., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1930.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 18, 1978.

Rehearing Denied May 19, 1978.

*72Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Kurt Marmar, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William M. Grodnick, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY and HUBBART, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

On an adjudication hearing the appellant juvenile was determined to be delinquent, based on a petition for delinquency, charging him with stealing a school bus.

Appealing therefrom he contends the court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the petition on the ground that he was not brought to trial or adjudication hearing within the time required by the applicable speedy trial rule. We find merit in that contention, and reverse.

The appellant, who for convenience will be referred to as the defendant, was taken into custody on April 29, 1977. A written report, required to be made to the intake officer within three days after he was taken into custody, was not made until May 23, 1977, twenty-four days after the arrest. The delinquency petition was filed June 22, 1977. Trial thereon was set for August-17, 1977. At that time, on motion of the State, over objection of defendant, the trial or adjudication hearing was continued until August 22, 1977. On August 18, 1977 defendant moved for discharge. Defendant was entitled to be brought to trial within 93 days after arrest, on the basis of Section 39.03(2), Florida Statutes (1975), and Fla.R. Juv.P. 8.180. It was so held in the case of J. *W. H. v. State,*345 So.2d 871 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), on the authority of which the judgment appealed from is reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the delinquency petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1997              OCT-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      21,143,908              21,143,908
<SECURITIES>                                26,628,312              26,628,312
<RECEIVABLES>                               27,818,584              27,818,584
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,498,000               2,498,000
<INVENTORY>                                 20,630,306              20,630,306
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            99,121,697              99,121,697
<PP&E>                                      53,675,151              53,675,151
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,582,953              10,582,953
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             186,448,667             186,448,667
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,760,149               6,760,149
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     2,899,500               2,899,500
<OTHER-SE>                                 176,789,018             176,789,018
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               179,688,518             179,688,518
<SALES>                                     33,814,695             125,307,178
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,814,695             125,307,178
<CGS>                                       11,837,374              44,433,982
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,568,884              82,644,478
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             13,338,788              48,210,287
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,165,000              17,784,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,173,788              30,426,287
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,173,788              30,426,287
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.280                   1.041
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.278                   1.036
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23 - Consent of Experts


G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
---------------------------
Certified Public Accountant

                                                  330 E. Warm Springs
                                                 Las Vegas, NV  89119
                                                         702.528.1984
                                                  425.928.2877 (efax)


October 30, 2001


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of G. Brad Beckstead, CPA, consents to the inclusion of my report
of October 30, 2001, on the Financial Statements of Benchmark Technology
Corporation for the nine months ending September 30, 2001, in any filings
which are necessary now or in the near future to be filed with the US
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Signed,


/s/ G. Brad Beckstead
----------------------
G. Brad Beckstead, CPA


<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 162 (Thursday, August 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22120]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company that engages either 
directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking 
activity that is listed in Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) 
or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to 
banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise 
noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than September 4, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2034:
    1. Union Planters Corporation, Memphis, Tennessee, and its wholly-
owned bank holding company subsidiary, Capital Bancorporation, Inc., 
Memphis, Tennessee; to acquire Sho-Me Financial Corporation, Mt. 
Vernon, Missouri, and its wholly-owned savings association subsidiary, 
1st Savings Bank, f.s.b., Mt. Vernon, Missouri, and thereby engage in 
operating a savings institution, pursuant to Sec.  225.28(b)(4)(ii) of 
the Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 15, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-22120 Filed 8-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-10228

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

QUINTON SHELTON, also known as Debo,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:18-CR-272-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Quinton Shelton has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Shelton has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow

us to make a fair evaluation of Shelton’s claims of ineffective assistance of 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 11, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-10228 Document: 00515232511 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/11/2019
No. 19-10228

2

counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to 

collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Shelton’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 19-10228 Document: 00515232511 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/11/2019
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION N o. 04

- 13

- 00186

- CV Leticia R. BENAVIDES , Appellant

v. Shirley Hale Mathis, as Temporary Guardian of the Benavides Family Mineral Shirley Hale MATHIS , as Temporary Guardian of the Estate of Carlos Y. Benavides, Jr., Carlos

Y. Benavides III, Tomas Benavides and Ana B. Galo, as Co

- Trustees of the Benavides Fami ly Mineral Trust, Appellees From the 406th Judicial District Court , Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012

- CVQ

- 000427

- D4 Honorable Oscar J Hale, Jr. , Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: November 6, 2013 MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DIS MISSED IN PART FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION In the underlying lawsuit, appellant sued appellee Shirley Hale Mathis, as Temporary Guardian of the Estate of Carlos Y. Ben a vides, Jr., for tortious interference and for money had and received. The trial court rendered a summary judgment in favor of Mathis and severed these claims from appellant’s claims against the other appellees. Therefore, the trial court’s February 27, 2013 “Order Granting Traditional and No Evidence Summary Judgment” is final and appealable.04

- 13

- 00186

- CV Appellant also sued appellees Carlos Y. Benavides, III; Tomas Benavides; and Ana B. Galo, as Co

- Trustees of the Benavides Family Mineral Trust (“the co - trustee s”) for breach of fiduciary duty. The c o - trustees filed a counter

- petition for declaratory relief against appellant asking the trial court to declare that “all present and/or participating beneficial interests [in the trust] be and remain the sole and sep arate property of each respective present and/or participating beneficiary . . . .” The c o - trustees filed two motions for summary judgment: one as to appellant’s breach of fiduciary duty claim and a second on their request for declaratory relief. The tri al court rendered a summary judgment in favor of the c o - trustees on appellant’s breach of fiduciary duty claim ; however, t he judgment does not contain severance language . T herefore, the c o - trustees counter
- petition for declaratory relief and motion for su mmary judgment on their counter

- petition remain pending. The c o - trustees filed a motion to dismiss appellant’s appeal of the summary judgment in their favor on the grounds that the judgment is not final because their counter

- petition and motion for summa ry judgment on their counter

- petition remain pending. After examining the pleadings and claims raised by the parties below, w e agree the summary judgment is not final; therefore, we lack jurisdiction over this portion of appellant’s appeal. Accordingly, we GRANT the motion to dismiss appellant’s appeal from the trial court’s February 11, 2013, “Order on Defendant’s No

Evidence and Traditional Motion for Summary Judgment.” Appellant’s appeal from the trial court’s February 27, 2013 “Order Granting Traditio nal and No Evidence Summary Judgment” in favor of Mathis is RETAINED on this court’s docket.

PER CURIAM

- 2

-
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, T. Tracy Bilbrough, certify that:
1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Juno Lighting, Inc., a Delaware corporation;
2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
   a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 
   b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered in this report based on such evaluation;
and
   c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect , the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 
5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);
   a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; 
and
   b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: February 25, 2004



/s/ T. TRACY BILBROUGH
T. Tracy Bilbrough
Chief Executive Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ABISUK SINSAENG,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-72420

Agency No. A037-571-413

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued November 21, 2014

Submitted February 2, 2015

San Francisco, California

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, CHRISTEN, Circuit Judge, and SEABRIGHT,**

District Judge.

 

Abisuk Sinsaeng, a native and citizen of Thailand, was convicted of

dissuading a victim or witness in violation of Cal. Penal Code § 136.1(b)(1). The

Immigration Judge ordered him removed to Thailand, finding his conviction to be

FILED

MAR 31 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The Honorable J. Michael Seabright, District Judge for the U.S.

District Court for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation.
an aggravated felony because it is an offense relating to obstruction of justice

under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(S). Applying the interpretation of “obstruction of

justice” articulated in In re Valenzuela Gallardo, 25 I. & N. Dec. 838 (BIA 2012),

the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed Sinsaeng’s appeal. Sinsaeng now

petitions for review.1

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D). In light of our

decision in Valenzuela Gallardo v. Lynch, No. 12-72326, we remand to the Board

for either application of the agency interpretation announced in In re Espinoza

Gonzalez, 22 I. & N. Dec. 889 (BIA 1999), or consideration of a new construction

of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(S). 

PETITION GRANTED IN PART, AND REMANDED. 

1 The parties are familiar with the facts, so we do not recount them in

detail. 
Sinsaeng v. Lynch, No. 13-72420

SEABRIGHT, District Judge, dissenting:

I respectfully dissent for the reasons stated in my dissent from the majority

Opinion in Valenzuela Gallardo v. Lynch, No. 12-72326.

FILED

MAR 31 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
#### Luis FERNANDEZ and Aida Lezcano Diaz, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1699.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 18, 1978.

Rehearing Denied May 19, 1978.

Alan B. Oppenheimer and Harold Mende-low, Miami, for appellants.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Ira N. Loewy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HAYERFIELD, C. J., PEARSON, J., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The defendants, Fernandez and Diaz, appeal their judgments and sentences for the crimes of (1) aiding and assisting in the conducting of a lottery, and (2) the possession of lottery paraphernalia. The points raised urge reversal upon the denial of their motions to suppress the evidence seized under a search warrant and their motion to reveal the identity of a confidential informant. Fernandez urges that his sentence to eight months in the county jail, as a condition of probation, was unlawful. Diaz urges that with regard to his participation, the evidence was insufficient to support the finding of guilty. We find no error upon any of the points advanced and we affirm.

Affirmed.
#### Velma HAWTHORNE v. Dr. Aaron SHIRLEY et al.

No. 50208.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 5, 1978.

Abe A. Rotwein, Jackson, for appellant.

Anderson, Banks, Nichols & Stewart, Fred L. Banks, Jr., Regina Epps, Jackson, for appellees.

Before SMITH, P. J., and LEE and COF-ER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

BOWLING, J., took no part.
PUBLIC LAW 110–433—OCT. 16, 2008 122 STAT. 4971 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6296: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

July 15, considered and passed House. 

Oct. 2, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–433 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To extend through 2013 the authority of the Federal Election Commission to impose 

civil money penalties on the basis of a schedule of penalties established and 

published by the Commission. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY AUTHORITY 

OF FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION THROUGH 2013. 

(a) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Section 309(a)(4)(C) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 437g(a)(4)(C)) is 

amended by adding at the end the following new clause: 

‘‘(iv) This subparagraph shall apply with respect to violations 

that relate to reporting periods that begin on or after January 

1, 2000, and that end on or before December 31, 2013.’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 640 of the Treasury 

and General Government Appropriations Act, 2000 (Public Law 

106–58; 2 U.S.C. 437g note) is amended by striking subsection 

(c). 

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section 

shall take effect as if included in the enactment of the Treasury 

and General Government Appropriations Act, 2000. 

Approved October 16, 2008. 

2 USC 437g 

note. 

Applicability. 

Oct. 16, 2008 

[H.R. 6296] 


kgrant on POHRRP4G1 with PUBLAW
### SERVE D NOVEMBE R3 , 201 0 rPARTMFN T O F U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N • . '.' ' r-A9ftmB9!)', A 

### v'.~ i OPERATION S OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C mNO V - U A 9:2 S IN TH E MATTE RO F EMPIR E AIRLINES , INC
. FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP09NM000 9 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DM S No
. FAA-2009-058 6
POS T HEARIN G BRIEFIN G SCHEDUL E Thi s matte r

cam e for hearin g o n Octobe r

2 6 an d27 , 201 0 i n Portland , OR
. Th e hearin g transcrip t

i s forthcoming
. WHEREFORE , th e partie s shal l adher e t o th e followin g Pos t Hearin g Briefin g Schedule : 1
. Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (hereinafte r "Complainant" ) shal l file it s Post-Hearin g Brie f

o n o r befor e Januar y 28 , 2011 ; 2
. Federa l Express , Inc
. (hereinafte r "Respondent" ) shal l file it s Post-Hearin g Brie f o n o r befor e Februar y 14 , 2011 ; an d 3
. Complainan t

shal l file it s Rebutta l Brief , i f any , o n o r

befor e Februar y 21 , 2011
.

licharcfjC
. Goodwi n U.S
. Administrativ e La w Judg e Attachment(s ) - Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No
. CP09NM0009 (Civil Penalt

y Action) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L & ON

E COPY Federa l Aviatio n Administration 80 0 Independence Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D

C 2059 1 Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building - Suit

e 2W1000 ' ON E COPY Courtne y E
. Felts , Respondent' s Counsel Staf f Attorney , Federa

l Express , Inc
. 362 0 Hack s Cros s Roa

d Buildin g B , 3" " Floo

r Memphis , T

N 38125-8800 TEL : 901-434-863 2 FAX : 901-434-828 3 Lawrence W
. Bierleiti , Respondent' s Counsel 110 1 30 * Street , N

W Suit e 500 Washington , DC 20007 TEL : 202-625-835 5 FAX : 202-625-436 3 Scot t R
. Morris , Complainant' s Counsel Attorqpy , Offic

e of th e Regiona

l Counsel Northwest Mountai n Region , ANM-7 , FA

A 160 1 LindAvenue , S.W
. Renton , W A 9805 7 TEL : 425-227-141 7 FAX : 425-227-1007 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrative La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2

0 U.S
. Departmen

t o f Transportation 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. East Building Groun

dFloor , Roo

mEl2-32 0 Washington , D

C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso

r 202-366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t 202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b

y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e in person o

r b y expeditedcourier , us e th e foUovrin g address : Hearin g Docket , Federa

l Aviation Administratirai , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wri^ t Building - Roo m2014 , Washington , DC 20591 , Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430
.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                        CERTIFICATION OF THE PRESIDENT

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    I, Ramon Chimelis, president, treasurer, and secretary, certify that
the forgoing quarterly report on Form 10-QSB containing the financial
statements set forth within fully comply with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o (d)) and that information contained in the quarterly report
presents fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Big Sky Industries VI, Inc.


Date: May 20, 2003             /s/ Ramon Chimelis
                               -------------------------------
                               Ramon Chimelis
                               President



<PAGE>