alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 10, 2016

Order 

Clerk

June 10, 2016

152047(68)

BARUCH SLS, INC.,

Petitioner-Appellant,

SC: 152047

v COA: 319953

Tax Tribunal:00-395010;

00-415093

TOWNSHIP OF TITTABAWASSEE,

Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of Chelsea Health & Wellness 

Foundation, d/b/a Five Healthy Towns Foundation, to participate as amicus curiae and 

file an amicus brief is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on June 3, 2016, is 

accepted for filing.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA to hold Restoration Advisory Board meeting July 11 in Chesterfield

By DLA Aviation Public Affairs Office

                RICHMOND, Va.  –              
Defense Logistics Agency officials from Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia will host a Restoration Advisory Board meeting at 7:30 p.m., July 11, 2016 at the Bensley Community Center located at 2900 Drewry's Bluff Rd., North Chesterfield, Virginia 23237. The meeting is open to the public.   

As part of ongoing evaluation and cleanup, DLA has established a citizen advisory committee called a Restoration Advisory Board (RAB).  The RAB comprises members from the community, DLA, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. 

The meeting will cover the DLA Installation Support at Richmond, Environmental Office's ongoing groundwater testing results and remediation activities for operable units on center.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries VI, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 25, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries VI, Inc.
```

[110th Congress Public Law 430]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ430.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 4846]]

Public Law 110-430
110th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Appointing the day for the convening of the first session of the One 
Hundred Eleventh Congress and establishing the date for the counting of 
    the electoral votes for President and Vice President cast by the 
 electors in December 2008. <<NOTE: Oct. 15, 2008 -  [H.J. Res. 100]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DAY FOR CONVENING OF ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS.

    The first regular session of the One Hundred Eleventh Congress shall 
begin at noon on Tuesday, January 6, 2009.

SEC. 2. <<NOTE: 3 USC 15 note.>> DATE FOR COUNTING 2008 ELECTORAL VOTES 
            IN CONGRESS.

    The meeting of the Senate and House of Representatives to be held in 
January 2009 pursuant to section 15 of title 3, United States Code, to 
count the electoral votes for President and Vice President cast by the 
electors in December 2008 shall be held on January 8, 2009 (rather than 
on the date specified in the first sentence of that section).

    Approved October 15, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 100:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            Sept. 28, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 2, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-KSB
ExperTelligence, Inc.
File No. 0-28453


          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of ExperTelligence, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended  September 30, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jason Smart, Chief
Executive and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: June 12, 2007              By:  /s/ Jason Smart
       ---------------                ----------------------------
                                        Jason Smart
                                        Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer






---------------------------------
A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to ExperTelligence,  Inc. and will be retained by ExperTelligence, Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
# FLIS-FPW - Federal Logistics Information System-Portfolio Workbench

/ Published Feb. 7, 2022

## Course Description

This course is designed for the cataloging audience. This training provides catalogers with instruction on navigating throughout FPW. The Inbox and Workload Manager area along with all the interface buttons associated with them re viewed and discussed. Students learn the importance of ¬filtering information to view the desired data. Workload unique data to specific cataloging role (s) is also discussed. 3 Hour Course.

## Target Audience

DLA, military services, Other Government Agencies, and United States (U.S) Government sponsored contractors doing business with the U.S. Government who work with or in cataloguing.

## Delivery Methods

Classroom Instruction (3 Hours)

## Contact us

For questions or additional interest in Training.

**Scheduling Program Manager**Commercial/Federal Telecommunication System (FTS): **269-961-4829DSN: **312-661-4829**J31CT Training Office Fax Line**Commercial/Federal Telecommunications System (FTS)/FAX: **269-961-5035DSN: **312-661-5035E-mail: **dla.tng@dla.mil
#### Stewart STEPHENS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2380.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 30, 1978.

*22Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Karen Gottlieb, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, NATHAN and KE-HOE, JJ.

PEARSON, Judge.

The defendant pleaded nolo contendere to a charge of grand larceny pursuant to a negotiated plea and a reservation of right to appeal the denial of his motions for discharge under the speedy trial rule (Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191).[1] The right of a defendant to accept a negotiated plea of nolo conten-dere and reserve the right to appeal is not argued in this case and is not decided on this appeal.

It affirmatively appears from the record in this case that the defendant, at the call of the case prior to the expiration of the 180 day period, announced that the defense was not ready because of the failure of defense witnesses to appear for deposition. At that time, defense counsel announced a desire to enter a negotiated plea if such could be arranged and further that if a negotiated plea could not be arranged, the defense would request a continuance. The trial was continued and, subsequently, the negotiated plea was entered.

Defense counsel’s announcement of his reason for requesting a continuance was not binding on the court. If defendant had desired to stand upon the rights granted him under the speedy trial rule, he could have presented the alleged fault of the State as a basis for not going to trial on the scheduled date. If the court found that the continuance had been necessitated by the failure of the State to proceed properly, the defendant would have been entitled to discharge upon the expiration of the 180 day period. To hold otherwise would deprive the State of the opportunity to proceed under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(d)(2) for a continuance not charged to the State.

We conclude, therefore, that this appeal is not governed by the rule in *State ex rel. Wright v. Yawn,*320 So.2d 880 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), but falls within the rule announced by the Supreme Court of Florida in *Rubiera v. Dade County ex rel. Benitez,*305 So.2d 161 (Fla.1974).

Affirmed.

1

. This appeal was first presented to this court upon a public defender memorandum brief pursuant to motion to withdraw. The court, finding an arguable point upon appeal, denied the motion and required full briefs by appellant and the State.
FIL ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T SEP 22, 2011 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 1- 10 74 9 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 2 :1 0- cr-0 03 24 -LSC-R RA-1 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us GREGORY KELTO N, D efen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e North ernDis tri ctof Al ab am a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (Sep te m be r 22 , 20 11 ) Befo re HULL, MARTIN an d ANDERSON, Ci rcu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM: Greg ory J. Re id , app oi nt edco un se l fo r Greg ory Kelt on inth is di rect cri m in al ap pe al , has m ov edto withd raw fro m furth er re pr es en ta ti onof t he ap pe ll an t an d fi le d abri ef p ur su an t t o And er s v. C al if orni a , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct .13 96 , 18 L.Ed.2d49 3 (1 96 7) . Our i nd ep en de ntrev ie w of the en ti re re co rdrev eal s

th atco un se l’s as se ss m en t o f th e rel at iv e m eri t o f th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Bec au se in de pe nd en t ex am in at io n o f th e en ti re rec or d re ve al s n o a rg uabl e is su es of m eri t, co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is GRANTED , andKelt on ’s con vi ct io n a nd se nt en ce ar e AFFIRMED .

2
Amendment 2, First American Corporation Directors Deferred Compensation Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.3 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER 2 
 TO THE 
 FIRST AMERICAN CORPORATION 
 DIRECTORS DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

 (the “Plan”) 
 WHEREAS, the current index used to determine the interest rate provided in Section 4.2(a) is no longer printed in The Wall Street Journal; and 
 WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee has approved amending the Plan to provide for a new reporting source for the index: 
 NOW THEREFORE, Regions Financial Corporation, successor to AmSouth Bancorporation, hereby amends the Plan effective January 1, 2007,
as follows: 
 1. By amending Section 4.2(a) in its entirety to read as follows: 
 (a) Deferred Compensation Account. The amount of each Director’s Deferred Compensation Account shall accrue
interest, compounded monthly (on a 30 day month, 360 day year basis), from the day the Deferred Compensation is credited to the Deferred Compensation Account to the date payment is made at an annual rate equal to the simple interest bond equivalent
yield reported on the first U.S. Government bond reported in Bloomberg (or such other source as may be determined by the Investment Department of Regions), maturing in the next calendar year as of the close of business of the first business day of
each year. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Regions Financial Corporation has
executed this Amendment Number 2 on this 25th day of July, 2007, to be effective as provided above. 
  

			
	REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
		
	 By:
	 	 /S/    DAVID B.
EDMONDS        

		 	David B. Edmonds
	Its:	 	Senior Executive Vice President
UNITED
        STATES
 SECURITIES
        AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington,
        D.C. 20549
  FORM
        8-K
  CURRENT
        REPORT
  Pursuant
        to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  Date
        of
        Report (date of earliest event reported):   November 1,
        2007
  VALLEY
        COMMERCE BANCORP
 (Exact
        name of registrant as specified in its charter)
  California
              333-118883
              46-1981399(State
                  or other jurisdiction
                of
                  incorporation)
              (Commission
                  File Number)
              (IRS
                  Employer
                Identification
                  No.)
 
 200
                  South Court Street
                Visalia,
                  California
              93291(Address
                  of principal executive offices)
              (Zip
                  Code)
 
  Registrant’s
        telephone number, including area
        code:  (559) 622-9000
  N/A
 (Former
        name or former address, if changed since last report)
   Check
        the
        appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
        satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
        provisions:
  o  Written
        communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
        230.425)
  o  Soliciting
        material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
        240.14a-12)
  o  Pre-commencement
        communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
        240.14d-2(b))
  o  Pre-commencement
        communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
        240.13e-4(c))
   
  Item
        2.02                            Results
        of Operations and Financial Condition
 
 On
        November 1, 2007, the registrant
        issued the press release attached hereto as Exhibit 99 and incorporated herein
        by reference.
 
 
 
 Item
        9.01.                            Financial
        Statements and Exhibits
 
 (c)                  
        The exhibit list required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the
        exhibit index filed as part of this report.
  
  SIGNATURES
  Pursuant
        to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
        has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
        hereunto duly authorized.
  Dated:
                  November 1, 2007
              Valley
                  Commerce Bancorp
                
                
                
                By:
                  /s/Roy O. Estridge
                Roy O. Estridge
                Executive Vice President and
                Chief Financial
                  Officer
  
  
 EXHIBIT
        INDEX
  99
              Press
                  release dated November 1, 2007 announcing unaudited financial results
                  for
                  the six month period ended September 30,
                  2007.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Silicon Mountain Holdings, Inc.;
 
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
   
 Date:
May 19, 2008
    

/s/
Rudolph (Tré) A. Cates III
Rudolph (Tré) A. Cates III, President and
Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1458 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1458

       To temporarily suspend the duty on Baytron and Baytron P.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 2005

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To temporarily suspend the duty on Baytron and Baytron P.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BAYTRON AND BAYTRON P.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.39.15 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain aqueous dispersions) 
is amended by inserting ``, whether or not containing binder resin and 
organic solvent'' immediately before ``(CAS No.'' and by striking ``12/
31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7803
DAVID BOYD KERR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JANET SALYER; WILLIAM HILL; GEORGE DEEDS; RICHARD YOUNG, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-962-R) Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 4, 1997 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Boyd Kerr, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kerr v. Salyer , No. CA-96-962-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 7, 1996). We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DA DEFENSE LOGISTICS HQ, LLC, A 

LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP,

 

 Appellant,

v.

RANDALL BENART,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00192-CV

Appeal from the

327th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2020DCV2149)

O R D E R

On September 23, 2020, Appellant filed notice of appeal in the above-styled and numbered 

cause. The notice of appeal is late, but it was filed within fifteen days after the deadline for the 

notice of appeal to be filed. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an 

appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by TEX.R.APP.P.

26.1 but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension 

of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). However, an appellant must 

still provide the Court with a reasonable explanation for the late filing of the notice of appeal before 

the Court may accept the appeal. Accordingly, Appellant is ordered to respond in writing and 

provide the Court with a reasonable explanation for filing the notice of appeal late. See

TEX.R.APP.P. 10.5(b)(1)(C), 26.3; Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617. The explanation is due to be filed 

no later than October 4, 2020. If Appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal is subject to 

dismissal without further notice.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of September, 2020.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
No. 96-6046.

#### Bell *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.