alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1


          BIGSTRING LAUNCHES FACEBOOK APPLICATION THAT ENABLES USERS TO
               SEND MESSAGES & PHOTOS PROGRAMMED TO SELF-DESTRUCT

      Part of BigString's Initiative to Develop Social Networking Messaging
             Applications Built Around The Company's Core Technology

RED BANK, N.J., November 15, 2007 - A new application that enables Facebook
users to send exploding messages and pictures that can be programmed to
self-destruct at a specific time, has been launched by BigString Corporation
(OTCBB: BSGC). This new Facebook application is part of BigString's initiative
to develop social networking messaging applications built around the company's
core technology.

This application is based on BigString's self-destructing email feature. With
it, senders can determine when and how their Facebook message disappears by
choosing from more than 100 animations and effects, including fiery death,
exploding emoticons, explosions, etc.

Darin Myman, president and CEO of BigString Corporation stated, "We believe that
the rapid growth of social networks such as Facebook are creating a large and
important market opportunity for BigString's messaging technology. Our Facebook
application will be the first of many that will adapt our patent-pending email
technology for social networks."

                                 About BigString
                                 ---------------

BigString Corporation, owner and operator of BigString.com, is a provider of
social networking messaging applications and user-controllable email services.
In addition to permitting users to send recallable, erasable, self-destructing
messages and video, Big String's patent-pending technology allows emails and
pictures to be rendered non-forwardable, non-printable and non-savable before or
after the recipients read them, no matter what email service provider is used.

                           Forward-Looking Statements
                           --------------------------


Statements about the future expectations of BigString Corporation, and all other
statements in this press release other than historical facts, are
"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. BigString Corporation intends that such forward-looking
statements shall be subject to the safe harbors created thereby. Since these
statements involve certain risks and uncertainties and are subject to change at
any time, BigString Corporation's actual results could differ materially from
expected results.

CONTACT:   Darin Myman, BigString Corporation, 732-741-2840, darin@bigstring.com
           Howard Greene, Greene Inc., 516-825-0400, greenepr@bigstring.com or
           greenepr@aol.com
Exhibit32.2

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,ASADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofVillageEDOCS (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months endedSeptember 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Quarterly Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

| Date:  November 14, 2006                                                    | /s/ Michael A. Richard              |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|           ------------------------- | ----------------------------------- |
|                                                                                  | Chief Financial Officer             |

*ASIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHERDOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURETHAT APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTENSTATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO VILLAGEEDOCS AND WILLBE RETAINED BY VILLAGEEDOCS AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.*
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries VI, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 3, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries VI, Inc.
No. 00-6737.

#### Brown *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
#### The CHESTERFIELD COMPANY, Appellant, v. Frederick E. RITZENHEIM and Ada B. Ritzenheim, his wife, Appellees.

No. 76-2645.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 23, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 6, 1977.

*16Stephen F. Bacen and Leo N. Rose of Hunter, Atkinson & Golden, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant.

Fred R. Bland of Buckley & Bland, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

Appellant was the lessee and Appellee the lessor. This appeal is from an Order awarding attorneys fees to the lessor based on a contract provision which stated

> “The Lessee shall be liable to the Lessor for all costs, expenses, damages and attorneys’ fees which may be incurred or sustained by the Lessor by reason of the Lessee’s breach of any of the provisions of this lease.”

The lessee had sought a declaratory judgment under Chapter 86, Florida Statutes. That chapter does not provide attorneys fees for either party. Therefore, in order for the trial court to have properly awarded the fees it must have found the lessee to have breached a provision of the lease.

The lease provided a method by which the rent would escalate in proportion to the Consumer Price Index. The lease also had an option to purchase provision and the price to purchase rose with the Consumer Price Index.

Lessee became uncertain of his obligations under the lease because he alleged the rental and purchase price had risen beyond the fair market value of the property and beyond what the parties had contemplated when the lease was agreed upon. That is why he sought declaratory relief. Before Judgment lessee voluntarily dismissed his Complaint and bought the property.

The court awarded $3500 attorneys fees saying “the filing of this suit was in effect an effort ... to circumvent the provisions of the lease requiring the defense of the lease . . . and under the stated circumstances the Defendants are entitled to recover as costs their reasonable attorneys’ fees based on the lease.” If this Order meant the fees are recoverable as costs under Section 86.081, Florida Statutes, we disagree and reverse. *Harris v. Richard N. Groves Realty, Inc.,*315 So.2d 528 (Fla.4th DCA 1975). If this Order meant based on the lease we disagree and reverse because there was no showing of any breach of the lease.

Reversed.

LETTS, J., concurs.

CROSS, J., concurs only in conclusion.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of American Physicians Service Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.







|                        |  |               
|----------------------- |  | --------------
|/s/ Marc J. Zimmermann  |  | March 13, 2008
|Marc J. Zimmermann      |  | Date          
|Chief Financial Officer |  |
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Miracor Diagnostics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ross S. Seibert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
USC ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003,
that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

                                                         /s/ Ross S. Seibert
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Ross S. Seibert,
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

Dated: March 27, 2006
~PPII’CE BBS’ 

E ~TTOlWEY GENE= 

AUSTPN. TIEXAS 

xn Gpinian l?o. a-35&5 thla dopertmellt held that tlm 

hulder d (I oontnot oarrhr pet la sabjeot tb tiJm geosu 


L 

‘
#### Michael EVANCO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. EE-465.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 23, 1977.

Selig I. Goldin of Goldin & Cates, Gaines-ville, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

McCORD, Chief Judge.

On August 18,1977, our opinion was filed in the above appeal, 350 So.2d 780. In the final paragraph thereof, we relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court with directions that a hearing be held to determine whether or not a threat or threats had been made to Officer Hoover or his family upon which he grounded his refusal to answer certain questions upon appellant’s discovery deposition and also to determine whether or not appellant was prejudiced by the officer’s failure to answer the questions. Thereafter, such hearing was held and the trial judge has entered his order making the following findings of fact:

> “A. No threats were made upon Officer Hoover before trial by the Appellant nor by anyone acting in concert with him, or at his direction or request nor upon his behalf.

> B. There is evidence that Appellant had contact with Officer Hoover on two occasions since the trial. On the first Appellant is alleged to have told Officer Hoover, in substance, ‘If you want to stay alive, you’ll get out of town.’ On the second Appellant is alleged to have told Officer Hoover, ‘My people are out. We will kill you and your family.’ Upon the last of these contacts which occurred on the same day, Appellant allegedly spat upon Officer Hoover and called him a ‘S.O.B.’ The testimony of Officer Hoover with respect to these conversations is uncorroborated and denied by appellant.

> C. Any threats made subsequent to the trial are irrelevant to the issues assigned to this Court for decision.

> D. The verdict of the jury rested largely upon the substantive testimony of Officer Hoover. The trial may have resulted in the different verdict had the appellant been accorded the opportunity to attack or cast doubt upon the credibility of Officer Hoover by evidence which might have been developed upon inquiry into those matters which he refused to disclose.”

The trial judge further found:

> “The Appellant’s right to effective trial preparation and proper cross examination were prejudiced by the refusal of Officer *148Hoover to disclose his residence address, his marital and parental status.”

We have considered the record made upon remand, the trial court’s above findings, and the brief of appellant filed pursuant to our order allowing supplemental briefs. Appellee did not file a supplemental brief. We find no error in the findings of the trial court and reverse for a new trial.

RAWLS and SMITH, JJ., concur.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA senior enlisted leader visits senior enlisted advisor to the Joint Chiefs

By DLA Public AffairsDLA Public Affairs

                FORT BELVOIR, Virginia  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Marine Corps Sgt. Maj. Bryan BattagliaDLADefense Logistics AgencyCommand Sgt. Major Charles Tobin
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 31, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 31, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17I0226. PLUM CREEK TIMBERLANDS, LP v. DONALD B. HARRIS et al..
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2015CA306
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

Certification of Treasurer



I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Big Sky Industries IV, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: February 5, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 158 (Friday, August 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21627]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of field tour.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee will meet on 
September 25, 1997, at the Cle Elum Ranger District Office, 803 W. 2nd 
Street, Cle Elum, Washington. The Provincial Advisory Committee members 
will meet at the Ranger District Office at 9:00 a.m., then proceed to 
the field tour in the Swauk Creek drainage area. The tour will end at 
4:00 p.m. This field tour will focus primarily on dry forest management 
projects. All Yakima Province Advisory Committee meetings are open to 
the public. Interested citizens are welcome to attend.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct questions regarding this meeting to Paul Hart, Designated 
Federal Official, USDA, Wenatchee National Forest, 215 Melody Lane, 
Wenatchee, Washington 98801, 509-662-4335.

    Dated: August 5, 1997.
Sonny J. O'Neal,
Forest Supervisor, Wenatchee National Forest.
[FR Doc. 97-21627 Filed 8-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Plan Administrator

Total System Services, Inc. 

   2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-181790) on Form S-8 of Total System Services, Inc. of our report dated April 11, 2014, with respect to thestatements of financial condition of the Total System Services, Inc. 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related statements of operations and changes in plan equity for the year ended December 31,2013 and the period from inception (July 1, 2012) to December 31, 2012, which report appears in the December 31, 2013 annual report on Form 11-K of the Total System Services, Inc. 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, included as Exhibit 99.1to the December 31, 2013 annual report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 of Total System Services, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

April 11, 2014