alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #9 Ltd. (the
Partnership) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) 
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) 
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | By: | /s/Freddie M. Kotek
| | --- | -------------------

| | Name: | Freddie M. Kotek
| | ----- | ----------------

| | Title: | Chief Executive
              Officer of the Managing General Partner
| | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Date: | August 16,2004
| | ----- | --------------
No. 00-6681.

#### Grimes *v.*Mueller.

Ct. App. Colo. Certio-rari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 158 (Friday, August 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21684]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[ID-957-1430-00]


Idaho: Filing of Plats of Survey

    The plat of the following described land was officially filed in 
the Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, Boise, Idaho, 
effective 9:00 a.m. August 7, 1997.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of a portion of the 
east boundary, and of the subdivisional lines, and the subdivision of 
tract A in section 25 (now lots 1 and 2 of section 25), and of a metes-
and-bounds survey within section 25, T. 8 S., R. 24 E., Boise Meridian, 
Idaho, Group 983, was accepted, August 7, 1997.
    This survey was executed to meet certain administrative needs of 
the Bureau of Land Management. All inquiries concerning the survey of 
the above described land must be sent to the Chief, Cadastral Survey, 
Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 1387 South Vinnell Way, 
Boise, Idaho, 83709-1657.

    Dated: August 7, 1997.
Duane E. Olsen,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Idaho.
[FR Doc. 97-21684 Filed 8-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of
Global Wataire, Inc. for the quarter ending , I, Edmund J. Gorman, Chief
Financial Officer of Global Wataire, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.     Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending , fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.     The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ending , fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Global Wataire, Inc.

     Dated:  18 July 2007

                                   /s/ Edmund J. Gorman
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Edmund J. Gorman, Chief Financial Officer of
                                   Global Wataire, Inc.
EXHIBIT 10.57


                            FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE
                            ------------------------


This First Amendment to Lease ("First Amendment") is entered into as of July 10,
2003 by and between the 1989 Sheehan Family Trust dated October 24, 1989
("Lessor") and Electronic Clearing House, Inc., a Nevada Corporation ("Lessee"),
and amends that certain Standard Multi-Tenant Lease - Gross dated May 21, 2003
for the Premises commonly known as 730 Paseo Camarillo, Suite 200, Camarillo,
California ("Premises"), as more particularly described therein.

Lessee wishes to lease additional space and the parties wish to amend the Lease
to specify the New Premises and new terms and conditions.  Accordingly, the
parties agree to amend the Lease as follows:

     1.   NEW PREMISES:
          Suite 101 consisting of approximately 1,536 usable square feet shall
          be added to the Premises for a total New Premises of approximately
          21,566 square feet.
     2.   EFFECTIVE DATE:
          October 1, 2003.
     3.   EARLY POSSESSION OF SUITE 101:
          Upon full execution of this First Amendment.
     4.   NEW MONTHLY BASE RENT:
          $23,722.60.
     5.   ADDITIONAL BASE RENT AND SECURITY DEPOSIT TO BE PAID UPON EXECUTION:
          (a) Base Rent: $1,689.60 for the period October, 2003 for a total Base
          Rent paid of $23,722.60.
          (b) Security Deposit: $1,689.60 for a total Security Deposit paid of
          $23,722.60.
     6.   PARKING:
          142 unreserved spaces.
     7.   LESSEE'S SHARE OF OPERATING EXPENSE INCREASE:
          Fifty-three and 87/100 percent (53.87%).
     8.   TENANT IMPROVEMENTS:
          Lessee shall accept Suite 101 in its "as-is" condition except Lessor,
          at its cost, and within thirty (30) days of full execution of this
          First Amendment, shall complete the following improvements:
                 i. Add a single entry door with lockset from the lobby area
                    into Suite 101.
                ii. Paint the suite.
               iii. Add signage in the lobby area in a configuration and
                    location agreeable to Lessee and Lessor: "ECHO Shipping and
                    Receiving/Headquarters on 2nd floor".
                iv. At Lessor's option, add a door from Suite 101 into the
                    telephone area containing the UPS system.
     9.   UTILITIES AND SERVICES:
          Lessee shall pay, at Lessor's option, either Lessee's share or a
          reasonable proportion to be determined by Lessor of all charges for
          jointly metered utilities and for services to Suite 101.
     10.  FORCE AND EFFECT:
          To the extent that any terms of provisions of this Amendment are
          inconsistent with any terms of provisions of the Lease, the terms and
          provisions of this Amendment shall prevail and control for all
          purposes.



LESSOR:                                        LESSEE:
1989 Sheehan Family Trust                      Electronic Clearing House, Inc.
dated October 24, 1989                         a Nevada Corporation
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2354 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2354

   To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on Oxadiazon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2012

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on Oxadiazon.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OXADIAZON.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.73 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Oxadiazon) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``0.9%'' in the column 1 general rate of 
        duty column and inserting ``0.6%''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Ex parte Michael ELLIS.

SC 77-176.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 22, 1977.

FAULKNER, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7486
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BEVIL LEE GROVES, JR., Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-92-28-3-1-H, CA-96-241-5-H) Submitted: November 25, 1997 Decided: January 13, 1998 Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bevil Lee Groves, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Tracy David Knox, UNITED STATES ARMY, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)) and his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Groves , Nos. CR-92-28-3-1-H; CA-96-241-5-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 26 and May 13, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We deny Appellant's motion to remand this case for new trial. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 10.21**

**Fiscal Year 2007Criteria For Performance EvaluationOf The CEO**

1.                  The CEO willdirect the operation of the company in such a way as to achieve the fiscal year’07 projected earnings per share of $__.

2.                  The CEO willdirect the operation of the company in such a way as to achieve fiscal year ’07projected sales of $__ billion.

3.                  The CEO willoversee the successful rollout of the Sales and Business Strategy organizationchanges _________________________________.

4.                  Improve theoverall diversity of Cintas salaried partners __________________________________________________________________________.

5.                  The CEO willfocus the necessary resources to achieve the total company sales rep turnovergoal of ___%.

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ATC Healthcare, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ending February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Savitsky, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

                   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and result
                  of operations of the Company.

/S/ DAVID SAVITSKY
------------------
David Savitsky
Chief Executive Officer
__________, 2005

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.






















                                       52
No. 99-1233.

#### Bramlett *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Willie James COVINGTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1713.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 27, 1977.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Margarita Equiroz and Jose P. Rodriguez, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

HENDRY, Chief Judge.

Appellant, defendant below, was charged by information with uttering a forged instrument, forgery, grand larceny, and buying, receiving or concealing stolen property. A plea of guilty to uttering a forged instrument was entered at arraignment and the state abandoned the remaining charges. The trial court withheld adjudication and placed appellant on probation for a period of two (2) years, whereupon, this appeal has been taken.

In seeking reversal, appellant has raised two points on appeal, only one of which we need discuss, to wit: whether the trial court erred in accepting a guilty plea from appellant when the record reflects that appellant had not been properly advised of his right to counsel prior to the acceptance of said *212plea. After carefully reviewing the record, briefs and argument of counsel, it is our opinion that the trial court did so err, requiring reversal.

> Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.111(d)(2) provides that: “A defendant shall not be deemed to have waived the assistance of counsel until the entire process of offering counsel has been completed and a thorough inquiry into accused’s comprehension of that offer and his capacity to make that choice intelligently and understandingly has been made.”

In that appellant was not properly informed of the availability of a court appointed attorney upon a showing of indigency, no knowing and intelligent waiver of his sixth amendment right to counsel was made. *Mason v. State,*176 So.2d 76 (Fla.1965); *Simmons v. State,*175 So.2d 215 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965); *French v. State,*161 So.2d 879 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964).

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court must be reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.
#### Yalmond J. PORCHE v. ROBINSON BROTHERS, INC., et al.

No. 60712.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 1977.

In re: Ford Motor Co. applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 349 So.2d 975.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS and MARCUS, JJ., are of the opinion the writ should be granted.
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of ExperTelligence, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Francisco Terreforte, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

















Date: March 30, 2011                                           By: /s/ J. Francisco Terreforte


J. Francisco Terreforte


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ExperTelligence, Inc. and will be retained by ExperTelligence, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 217TH DISTRIC T COURT OF ANGELINA COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 1 7th
day of December, 2014 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

NITA RANAE MCELRATH , Appellant

NO. 12

- 14

- 00247

- CR; Trial Court No. 2013

- 0522

By per curiam opinion.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by

this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismi ssed, and that the

decision be certified to the court below for observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recogni zed, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN , Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Tyler, this the 10 th day of February , 2015

.

CATHY S. LUSK, C LERK

By:

_______________________________ Chief Deputy Clerk
#### Ex parte Cleo D. JACKSON.

SC 77-178.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 22, 1977.

BLOODWORTH, Justice.

Writ Denied.

TORBERT, C. J., and FAULKNER, AL-MON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John P. Powers, Chief Executive Officer of Intraop Medical Corporation,
certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Intraop Medical
Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

(a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


                                            /s/ John P. Powers
                                         ----------------------------------
                                             John P. Powers
                                             Chief Executive Officer

                                             Date: February 14, 2008
No. 99-7884.

#### Apple *v.*Glenn, Former United States Senator, et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
## U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f App eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 06-2129 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant,
v . KENNY BARNES, Defendant, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on October 29, 2007, is amended as follows: On page 5, line 20 : "McCann" should be "McMann" On page 6, line 1 : "McCann's" should be "McMann's"
No. 00-6666.

#### Edmond *v.*Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.