alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 163 (Friday, August 22, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44595-44596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22115]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96-10; RM-8738, RM-8799, RM-8800, RM-8801]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Ada, Ardmore, and Comanche, OK, and 
Blue Ridge, Bridgeport, Eastland, Farmersville, Flower Mound, 
Greenville, Henderson, Jacksboro, Mineola, Mt. Enterprise, Sherman and 
Tatum, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; petition for reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document dismisses a petition for reconsideration filed 
by Gleiser Communications, Inc. and a Joint Emergency Motion for Stay 
of Filing Window filed by Farmersville Radio Group, Gleiser 
Communications, Inc., Hunt Broadcasting, Inc. and Cowboy Broadcasting, 
L.L.C. The original proceeding reallotted and substituted broadcast 
channels or modified authorizations at Ada, Ardmore, and Comanche, 
Oklahoma, and Bridgeport, Eastland, Farmersville, Flower Mound, 
Henderson, Jacksboro, Mineola, Mt. Enterprise, Sherman, and Tatum, 
Texas. It also denied allotments at Blue Ridge and Greenville, Texas. 
See 62 FR 4660, January 31, 1997. With this action, the proceeding is 
terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 22, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Hayne, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2177.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order in MM Docket No. 96-10, adopted August 6, 
1997, and released August 15, 1997. The full text of this decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, Washington, DC. 
The

[[Page 44596]]

complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Suite 140, Washington, DC. 
20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
Douglas W. Webbink,
Chief, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-22115 Filed 8-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21462]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Partial Consent Decree Under the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that on July 31, 1997, a proposed partial 
consent decree in United States v. The North American Group Ltd., et 
al., Civil Action No. 3:97-CV-191-H was lodged with the United States 
District Court for the Western District of North Carolina.
    The partial consent decree resolves claims under 107 of the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act 
of 1980, 42 U.S.C. 9607, as amended, as to the State of North Carolina, 
Noble Oil Services, Federal Agencies and the 58 settling defendants 
listed in Attachment A to the Partial Consent Decree, for response 
costs that were incurred by the United States Environmental Protection 
Agency in connection with responding to the release and threatened 
release of hazardous substances at the Cherokee Site (``Site'') in 
Charlotte, North Carolina.
    The proposed consent decree provides that to resolve their 
liability to the United States for the response costs described above, 
the aforementioned entities will make the following payments: (1) The 
State of North Carolina will pay $27,118; (2) the Federal Agencies will 
pay $367,882; (3) Noble Oil Services will pay $10,000 within thirty 
days of the entry of the partial consent decree and will make seven 
quarterly installment payments of $14,533.50, the last of which will be 
paid on or before July 15, 1999; the remaining settling defendants will 
pay $3,657,500.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the partial 
consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney 
General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department 
of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to United States 
v. The North American Group Ltd., et. al, D.J. Ref. 90-11-2-1173.
    The partial consent decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney, Suite 1700 Carillon Building, 227 West Trade 
St., Charlotte, North Carolina, at U.S. EPA Region IV, 61 Forsythe St., 
N.E., Atlanta, GA 30303, and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G 
Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy 
of the partial consent decree may be obtained in person or by mail from 
the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, 
D.C. 20005. When requesting a copy, please enclose a check in the 
amount of $22.25 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the 
Consent Decree Library.
Walker Smith,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-21462 Filed 8-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
#### William Edward BOSWELL, Sr., Appellant, v. Betsy Marie BOSWELL, Appellee.

No. 76-2728.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 22, 1977.

S. Robert Zimmerman and William F. Sullivan, Pompano Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration fof the record and brief of appellant, appellee having failed to provide the court with a brief, we determine the order of the trial court bearing date December 14, 1976 modifying alimony and adjudicating property rights to be void in its entirety for lack of the trial court to provide for alimony in the final judgment of dissolution of marriage or reserve jurisdiction for future determination. *Weiss*v. *Weiss,*118 So.2d 833 (Fla.3d DCA 1960). The change of property rights is also void for lack of jurisdiction. *Finston v. Finston,*160 Fla. 935, 37 So.2d 423 (1948). Accordingly, the order bearing date December 14, 1976 is reversed.

Reversed.

CROSS and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., concurs in conclusion only.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of State Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas M. O’Brien, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of        the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| **3/12/10** | **/s/ Thomas M. O’Brien**           |
|-------------|-------------------------------------------|
| **Date**    | **Thomas M. O’Brien**               |
|        | **President and Chief Executive Officer** |
|        |                                      |

  

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of State Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian K. Finneran, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act        of 2002, that:

 

| 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| **3/12/10** | **/s/ Brian K. Finneran**   |
|-------------|-----------------------------|
| **Date**    | **Brian K. Finneran**       |
|        | **Chief Financial Officer** |

 

----
August 14, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

RONALD LEGG, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00547-CR V.

NO. 14-14-00548-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

These causes were heard on the transcript of the records of the court below. 

The records indicate that the appeals should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the 

appeals DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion, appellant pay all costs 

incurred by reason of these appeals, and that this decision be certified below for 

observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                            7752
<SECURITIES>                                     82607
<RECEIVABLES>                                   133479
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1716
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2050
<PP&E>                                            7179
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2180
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  233494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           205844
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           900
<OTHER-SE>                                       21926
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    233494
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 18986
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  7610
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   324
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3946
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1288
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2657
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.84
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 31, 2015

p0323

Order 

Clerk

March 31, 2015

149525

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 149525

COA: 308067

Kent CC: 10-012915-FC

OMAR ROSAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 29, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
xynex10qsbex101_11172007.htm


     

    
      
        

        

      

       

       

      Exhibit
        10.1

       

       

      


       

       

      $
        59,500                                                                       September
        29, 2007

       

       

      


       

       

      PROMISSORY
        NOTE

       

       

      ZYNEX
        MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC.

       

      For
        value
        received, Zynex Medical Holdings, Inc. (“Zynex”) promises to pay to the order of
        Thomas Sandgaard (hereinafter "Holder"), in legal tender, the sum of $59,500
        with interest on the outstanding balance at the annual rate of 8.25%. This
        Note
        commences September 29, 2007 (hereinafter "Commencement Date"), and all
        obligations set forth herein are measured from this date. This Note will
        be
        repaid on demand including payment of principal and interest accrued to date
        of
        payment. The note may be prepaid without penalty at Zynex’s option at any
        time.

      


      In
        the
        event of a default under the terms of this Note, upon ten days following
        written
        demand by Holder of this Note to cure such default, and such default having
        not
        been cured, Holder may, at Holder's sole and absolute discretion, declare
        all
        remaining principal and interest immediately due and payable. Waiver by Holder
        hereof to enforce any provisions of this Note shall not operate to bar Holder's
        rights to enforce any provisions of this Note at any later time or for any
        later
        default.

      


      All
        notices, payments and performance of the obligations under this Note shall
        be
        made at 1175 Castle Pointe Road, Castle Rock, CO 80104 or such other location
        as
        the holder may notify Zynex in writing. All notices or demands to the Company
        shall be given in writing to the Company’s principal office location at 8100
        Southpark Way, Suite A-9, Littleton, Colorado 80120.  Notices to all
        parties will be deemed provided when actually received by the other
        party.

      


      This
        Note
        shall be governed and interpreted under the laws of the State of
        Colorado.

      


               
/s/ Fritz G. Allison


      ________________________

      Zynex
        Medical Holdings, Inc.

       

      Fritz
        G.
        Allison

       

       

      Chief
        Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Jerome De Canio, Appellant, v Board of Trustees of the Village of Tarrytown et al., Respondents.

[614 NYS2d 148]

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the respondent Board of Trustees of the Village of Tarrytown, dated June 5, 1991, which, after a hearing, *inter alia,*dismissed the petitioner *321from the Village of Tarrytown Police Department. In addition, the petitioner appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Pirro, J.), entered February 20, 1992, as, upon tranferring the proceeding to this Court for a determination of the substantial evidence issue, granted the petition only to the extent of awarding him partial back pay.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits; and it is further,

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

There is substantial evidence in the record to support the determination of the respondent Board of Trustees of the Village of Tarrytown (hereinafter the Board) that the petitioner is guilty of the charges that were brought against him *(see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176). Further, the Board’s termination of the petitioner was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness *(see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222, 233).

We have reviewed the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21986]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-688-000]


Viking Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

August 14, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 8, 1997, Viking Gas Transmission Company 
(Viking), 825 Rice Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55117, filed in Docket 
No. CP97-688-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.212 of 
the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 157.205 and 157.212) under the 
Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to construct and operate 
delivery point facilities in Todd County, Minnesota, for Part 284 
transportation services by Viking, under Viking's blanket certificate 
issued in Docket No. CP82-414-000, pursuant to Section 7 of the NGA, 
all as more fully set forth in the request that is on file with the 
Commission and open to public inspection.
    Viking proposes to construct and operate a 2-inch hot tap, 0.5 mile 
of 2-inch lateral line, measurement and data acquisition equipment, and 
appurtenant facilities to serve the municipal utilities of Clarissa and 
Eagle Bend, Minnesota (Cities), under Viking's firm and interruptible 
rate schedules. It is stated that Viking will be fully reimbursed for 
the $142,600 cost of installing the tap by the Cities. It is explained 
that the delivery point will have a capacity of 2,208 dt equivalent of 
gas per day. It is further explained that the Cities have arranged with 
Northern States Power Company (Minnesota) to act as their gas supply 
agent. It is asserted that the volume of gas delivered to the Cities 
will be incremental, as no quantities are presently authorized, and 
that it will have no impact on Viking's peak day or annual deliveries. 
It is explained that the proposal is not prohibited by Viking's 
existing tariff and that Viking has sufficient capacity to accomplish 
the deliveries without detriment or disadvantage to its other 
customers.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21986 Filed 8-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
From: Joseph Stolle <joseph@shellengr.com>

To: Nathan Topham/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Stotts, Stacy" <SStotts@stinson.com>

Date: 06/10/2011 10:55 AM Subject: Re: 2009 EIQ Question re: non-lead HAP emissions

The uncontrolled emissions are assumed to be 80% PM10 for the particulate HAPs. The
PM10 fraction is not required to be double counted for fee purposes. In other words, the uncontrolled metal HAP emissions are first corrected to account for only the mass contained in particles greater than 10 microns. A control efficiency for the baghouses is then applied. Joseph A. Stolle, PE Shell Engineering (913)898-3000 Cell (816)377-2470

On 6/9/2011 12:55 PM, Topham.Nathan@epamail.epa.gov wrote: Hi Joseph,

I've got one more question with regards to the 2009 EIQ. I'm looking at Form 2.T for HAP emissions from emission point EP-059 (the main stack) and trying to figure out how the numbers add

up.

From what I can see, the non-lead metal HAP emissions are based on a speciation profile that was included in the 2008 EIQ. This speciation profile was based on a Method 29 stack test. That speciation profile, along with the lead emissions, is used to derive column 4 of the worksheet. I follow how everything was derived up until this point (except I'm still not aware of where the lead emission factor used in your inventories comes from, it can't be a 2006 stack test as the factor has been used since 2004).

In column 6 of the worksheet, it seems to show that only 20% of the uncontrolled emissions are reported as HAP while the rest seems to be reported as PM10 or VOC. The resulting value is Page 1used to calculate the controlled emissions in column 10 of the worksheet.

I was curious why the uncontrolled emissions are reduced by 80% across the board before applying the 90% control efficiency to derive the controlled emissions.

Please get back to me by tomorrow if possible, or if there is someone who is more intimately familiar with the inventory on your end who may be able to answer my question, please forward me their contact information. If you're not able to get back to me by tomorrow, please send me an email and let me know that you won't be able to.

Thanks, Nathan Topham Environmental Engineer US EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MIG Phone - (919)541-0483

Page 2