BOBBY JINDAL GOVERNOR PEGGY 

### M. HATCH SECRETARY

# ~tate 

# of lLouisiana

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

## OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

September 2,2010
Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief Air Planning Section U. 

### S. EPA Region 6 (6-PDL) 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 r.:**r~~**

.".', ;.,,, .'
';



### Re: Section 185 Fee Determination ofTermination, Baton Rouge Nonattainment Area Technical Amendment

DearMr. Donaldson:

Enclosed you will find a technical amendment to the Section 185 Fee Determination of Termination previously submitted by this agency. This technical amendment presents materials deemed necessary to substantiate the demonstration that the emissions reductions previously referenced are both permanentand enforceable.

Ifyou or your staffhas any questions concerning this submittal, please contact Vivian Aucoin, SIP Coordinatorat (225) 219-3419 or at vivian.aucoin@la.gov.

c: SandraRennie, EPA

Post Office Box 4301 • Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70821-4301 • Phone 225-219-3953 • Fax 225-219-3971

## RECEIVEE;

-- t)P(jL 

# AIR F'LANNING 

# SEC. 10 SEP -7 PH 4: 26

Louisiana State ImplementationPlanRevision

Section 185 Fee Determinationof Termination, BatonRouge NonattainmentArea Technical Amendment

Submittedto:

EPA Region 6 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, Texas 75202-2733

TA, September2010 

# DEO**LOUI.~**

### TechnicalAmendment to Section 185 Penalty 

### Fee Termination Determination



### Based on communications with EPA Region 6, Office ofAir Planning, concerning the permanent and enforceable provisions requirement outlined in the January 5, 2010, Guidance on Developing Fee Programs Requiredby CleanAirActSection 

### 185for the 1- hour Ozone NAAQS, 

### the Department is submitting a technical amendment to the Section 185 Penalty Fee Termination Determination SIP revision'. This technical amendment is comprised of the Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) and the Reasonably Achievable Control Measures/Reasonable Achievable Control Technology (RACM/RACT) section that was submitted as part ofthe Baton Rouge Nonattainment area redesignation request and maintenance package.
The Department believes the area will maintain its attainment status because of permanent and enforceable emissions reductions. The latest Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) report indicates that the area has exceeded the 15% emission reductions for both the RFP demonstration as well as the 3% contingency demonstration. The calculations are contained in Appendix G, Reasonable Further Progress--2002 to 2008 RFP Demonstration. A further indication can be seen in the Reasonably Achievable Control Measures (RACM)/Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) analysis that was submitted as a requirement to the redesignation and maintenance plan. This document outlines both the regulations governing volatile organic compounds and oxides of nitrogen, and the regulations stemming from the Control Technique Guidelines issued by EPA. 

### A list offacility applicability is also included. (See Appendix H)

1The fmal SIP revision, Section 185 Free Determination of Termination, Baton RougeNonattainment Area, was submittedto EPA on May 

### 18,2010.

### ,Appendix G

ReasonableFurtherProgress 

### 2002-2008 '

Section 185 Fee Determinationof Termination, Baton RougeNonattainmentArea Technical Amendment

TA, September2010

### 2002 TO 2008 RFP DEMONSTRATION



### A. INTRODUCTION On 

### June 15, 2004, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classified the Baton Rouge Nonattainment Area (BRNA) as marginal 

### for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard with an attainment date of June 15, 2007. Because the area did not meet the attainment date, the BRNA was re-classified to moderate 

### with a new attainment date ofJune 15,2010. (72 FR 61315-61320, 10/30/2007)

Phase II of the 1997 8-hour ozone implementation rule states that moderate 

### areas must meet the Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) requirements under sections 172(c)(2) and 182 of the 1990 Clean 

### Air . Act Amendments (CAAA). In 

### a memorandumfrom William T. Harnett ofEPA, which the State received

on August 15, 2006, guidance was providedfor calculating RFP for moderate 

### areas that have an approved 15% Rate ofProgress (ROP) plan under the I-hour standard and that have an attainment date after 2009. The guidance states: "These areas are treated like subpart I areas, which must obtain a 15% reduction (can be for NOx or VOC or a combination ofeither) for the first 6 years after the baseline year. OTAQ [EPA Office ofTransportation and Air Quality] is developing guidance for this situation. In 

### the meantime, the State should use Appendix AlMethod 2 (which applies to serious and higher classified areas) except that instead ofdemonstrating RFP for a total of 18% emission reductions for the first 6 years, the total would be 15% due to the moderate classification. See 40 CFR 51.91O(a)(1)(ii)(A), which refers to section 51.91O(b)(2)."
This document details the process and results to show that the state meets the 15% RFP emission reduction requirements for the periodbetweenthe 2002 base year through the 2008 RFP milestone year. Compliance with the 2008 milestone emission reduction requirements are demonstrated by using EPA guidance, first to calculate the elements of the RFP demonstration and then to use these elements in conjunctionwith EPA RFPmethodologyto demonstrate compliance with RFP reductionrequirements. The required RFP elements are:
• 2002 base year emissions

• 2002 to 2008 non-creditable reductions
• 2002 to 2008 required RFP reductions
• 2008 target level ofemissions
• 2002 to 2008 projected emissions growth
• 2008 RFP milestone yearprojected emissions with growth and controls
• Demonstration of compliance with RFP requirements
• Contingency plan

This document describes how the elements ofthe BRNA 2008 RFP demonstration are calculated and used to demonstrate compliance with 2008 RFP requirements. It also provides a summary ofthe 2008 BRNA RFP demonstration. First, the target level ofemissions for 2008 is calculated. Second, the 2008 RFP milestone year emissions with 2002 to 2008 emissions growth and controls are projected. Third, the 2008 target level ofemissions is compared to the projected 2008 RFP milestone year emissions in order

429

### to demonstrate compliance with the RFP requirements. Finally, in case of a milestone year failure, the required 3% contingency plan is provided.

B. 2008 TARGET LEVEL CALCULATION EPA guidance specifies the method states are to use to calculate the maximum amount ofemissions a nonattainment area can emit for an RFP milestone year. The RFP target level ofemissions is calculated with a six-step process.
• Develop the 2002 base year inventory
• Develop the 2002 RFP base year inventory

• Calculate the non-creditable fleet turnover correction
• Develop the adjusted RFP base year inventory for 2002 relative to 2008
• Calculate the 2008 required 15% emissions reduction
• Calculate the 2008 target level ofemissions
1. Develop the 2002 Base YearInventory EPA guidance specifies the method states must use to develop the base year inventory. Details ofthe development of the BRNA 2002 inventory are described in the document "2002 Base Year Emissions Inventory for the Baton Rouge Nonattainment Area" by LDEQ in June 2007 and submitted to EPA on July 20,2007. A summary ofthe 2002 base year emissions inventory is shown in Table B-1.



### try W kd E ., I 

# s a e 

# - : 

### ase ear zone eason 

### ee ay missions nven 0 

### Source Category NOx(TOQ.stDav) 

# voc (1'ons!Bay) Stationary Point 116.2 40.2 Area /with Nonroad 38.8 44.7 Mobile 44.7 23.0 Biogenic 0.0 99.6 Total 199.7 207.5 T bl B 1 BRNA2002B Y 

### 0

2. Develop the 2002 RFP 

### Base YearInventory EPA guidance specifies that the RFP reductions must be based on anthropogenic emissions only. For NOx, with no biogenic emissions in the 2002 Base Year Inventory, the 2002 RFP Base Year Inventory is the same as the 2002 Base Year Inventory. For VOC, the 2002 RFP Base Year Inventory is equal to 207.5 minus 99.6 or 107.9 tons/day (TPD).

3. Calculatethe Non-Creditable FleetTurnoverCorrection EPA guidance states that emission reductions due to vehicle fleet turnover (higher polluting older vehicles being replaced by lower polluting newer vehicles) are not creditable towards RFP. The emission inventories are a representation ofthe effects ofpre-1990 CAA controls projected to the RFP base and milestone years. As such, these inventories can be used to estimate the effects ofthe pre-1990 CAA controls between milestone years.
The emission rates are developed using the latest version of EPA's emISSIOn factor model, MOBILE6.2.03. The model input file is set up to disable all 1990 CAA effects, set the model evaluation

430year to the RFP base or milestone year, and then the model is run to determine emission factors for the base or milestone year with only pre-1990 CAA controls. The emission factors for all years are then multiplied by the 2002 base year vehicle miles travelled (VMT). The non-creditable fleet turnover correction is calculated by subtracting the 2008 projected emissions from the 2002 projected emissions. The results are summarized in Table B-2. (See Appendix

- Calculation ofFMVCP/RVP Reductions)

Table B-2: FMVCP/RVP Emissions Corrections NOx Mobile Emissions, TPD VOC Mobile 

### Emissions, TPD TargetYear Target Year Target Year 2002 Actual w/2002 VMT (l) 2002 Actual w/2002 VMT 

### (1)

2002 45.3 51.0 26.5 29.0

2008 45.3 44.6 26.5 24.6

Correction 6.4 

### 4.4 (1) Post 1990 CleanAir Actcontrols off



### 4. Develop the Adjusted 

### RFP Base YearInventory for 2002 Relative to 2008 The Adjusted RFP Base Year Inventory for 2002 Relative to 2008 is equal to the 2002 RFP Base Year Inventory, as calculated 

### in Step 2, minus the non-creditable fleet turnover correction, as calculated 

### in Step**~",'3.** For NOx, the calculation is 199.7 less 6.4 or 193.3 TPD. For VOC, the calculation is 107.9 less 4.4 or 103.5 TPD.



### 5. Calculatethe 2008 Required 

### 15% Emissions Reduction The EPA 1997 Phase 

### II 8-hour ozone implementation rule requires all ozone nonattainment areas classified as 

### moderate and above to reduce NOx and/or VOC emissions by 15% for the period 2002 through 2008. The required 2008 reductions are calculated by multiplying the Adjusted RFP Base Year Inventory for 2002 Relative to 2008, as calculated in Step 4, by the percentreduction needed to meet RFP requirements. LDEQ has decided to rely on NOx reductions to meet the RFP requirements. As such, the requiredNOxreductions are equal to 193.3 times 15% or 29.0 tons/day.

6. Calculatethe 2008 TargetLevel ofEmissions The 2008 Target Level ofEmissions is calculated by subtracting the required emission reductions, as calculated in Step 5, and the non-creditable fleet turnover correction, as calculated 

### in Step 3, from the 2002 Base YearInventory. ForNOx, the calculation is 199.7 minus 29.0 and minus 6.4 or 164.3 tons/day. The RFP plan must demonstrate that the projected emissions for 2008, reflecting growth and the RFP control strategy, will be less 

### than or equal to the 2008 Target Level ofEmissions. Table B-3 summarizes the calculation ofthe TargetLevel. Note: The VOC calculation is shown for information only.



### Le I

## r BRN fT fC 

### I I . 

### T bl 

### B 3 S

a e 

### - : 

### ummarv o a cu arion 0 

### arget ve or A Description NOx, TPD VOC, TPD Step 1: 2002 Base YearInventory 199.7 207.5 Step 2: Emissions from Biogenic Sources 0.0 99.6 Step 2a: Calculate the 2002 RFP Base Year Inventory (Step 1 minus Step 2) 199.7 107.9 Step 3: 2002 to 2008 Non-creditable FleetTurnoverCorrection 6.4 4.4 Step 4: Calculate the Adjusted RFP Base YearInventory (Step 2a minus Step 3) 193.3 103.5

431

### Step 5: PercentofNOx and VOC to meet 15% Reduction Requirement 15.0 0.0 Step Sa: Calculatethe 2008 15% Reduction Requirement (Step 4 times Step 5) 29.0 0.0 Step 6: Calculatethe 2008 Target Levels (Step 4 minus Step Sa) 164.3 103.5



### C. 2008 RFP MILESTONE YEAREMISSIONS PROJECTION EPA guidance specifies the method states must use to project 

### the 2008 milestone year emissions. The projection is used to demonstrate compliance with RFP reduction requirements. The RFP milestone year emissions are projectedwith a three-step process.

• Determinethe growth from 2002 to 2008 for the various source categories

• Determinethe emissionreductions from controls appliedbetween 2002 and 2008
• Project the 2008 RFP milestone year emissions

1. Determine the Growth from 2002 to 2008 forthe Various Source Categories EPA guidance requires that the growth ofeach source category be determined and included in the 2008 milestone yearemissionsprojection.

Point Sources - The BRNA is classified as 

### moderate nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. The CAA Section 182(b)(5) requires 

### moderate areas to off-set growth by a minimum of 1.15 to 1.0. For this RFP demonstration, it is assumed that the off-set requirement will result in no NOx point source growth within the BRNA. The correctness ofthis assumption can be confirmed by comparing the point

source inventory from the 2002 base year with the LDEQ Emission Inventory (EI) for 2007 (2008 is not yet available) as follows:



### t ti 2002 

### t 2007 fNO I 

### Tbl C 1 Ca e 

# - : 

### omparison.e x nven on' or 0 

## llescringon, '**~. l~~.'l'PD**  

### 2002 Base YearNOx Point Source Inventory 116.2 NOx Control Rule Reductions 40.0 (1) 

### NOx Inventory AfterControls 76.2 2007EINOx 71.2 

### (1) The NOx control rule (LAC 33:III.2201) was designed to achieve approximately 40 TPD reductions in the BRNA.

Therequired off-set, plus otherfactors, has resultedin an estimatedexcess overcontrols decrease in point

source emissions ofapproximately 5 TPD. (See 2002 and 2007 Point Source Inventories in Appendix

- Point Sources by Facility)

Area and Nonroad Sources

- EPA guidance requires that states project growth of these emission categories with the Economic Growth Analysis System (EGAS) model. The EGAS growth factors for the emission categories in the BRNA were determined and then multiplied times the 2002 emissions to get the projected2008 emissions. The growth was calculatedby subtracting the 2002 emission from the 2008 estimated emission for each category. (See Appendix

- Calculation of Area Source Growth, Calculation ofNonroad Source Growth)

Mobile Sources - EPA guidance requires that states project mobile source growth with the MOBILE6.2.03 model. Using the model and the projected2008 VMT, the 2008 estimatedemissions were

432

### determined. The growth was calculated by subtracting the 2002 emissions from the 2008 estimated emissions. (SeeAppendix

- Calculation ofMobile Source Growth)
The following table summarizes theprojected growth from 2002 to 2008 for all source types.

T bl C 2 P . t d G th b S T

a e 

# - : 

### rorec e row )y ource 

### ivne Source Type NOx,TPD VOC,TPD Point 0.0 0.0 Area 0.26 3.29 Nonroad 3.90 0.36 Mobile -15.7 -7.8 Total Growth -11.54 

### -4.15

2. Determinethe Emission Reductions from Controls Applied Between 2002 and 2008 a. In early 2002 LDEQ promulgated a NOx control rule (LAC 33:III, Chapter 22) that established requirements for reducing NOx emissions during the ozone season in the Baton Rouge nonattainment area as well as four parishes to the north ofBaton Rouge. Affected facilities includedthose with one or more sources that collectively emitted or had the potential to emit fifty tons per year or more ofNOx. The rule established emission factors for boilers, heaters, furnaces, turbines and internal combustion engines. Further, the rule established requirements for permits, compliance demonstration, recordkeeping and reporting. Facilities were required to have controls fully operational by May 1,2005

.

.r,·'-·

### The rule established the following emission limits:
• Electric Power Generating System Boilers Coal-fired 0.211b/MMBtu Number 6 Fuel Oil-fired 0.18 Ib/MMBtu All Others (gaseous or 

### liquid) 0.10 Ib/MMBtu
• Industrial Boilers 0.10 Ib/MMBtu • Process Heaters/Fumaces Ammonia Reformers 0.23 Ib/MMBtu All Others 0.08 Ib/MMBtu • Stationary Gas Turbines Peaking Service, Fuel Oil-fired 0.30 Ib/MMBtu Peaking Service, Gas-fired 0.20 IblMMBtu

All Others 0.161bIMMBtu • Stationary Internal Combustion Engines Lean-bum 4 g/Hp-hour

Rich-bum 2 g/Hp-hour Additionally, after the BRNA was reclassifiedto severe, LDEQpromulgated a revision to Chapter 22 (29LRI674) that establishedrequirements for smaller NOx sources - equal to or greater than twenty-five tons per year and less than fifty tons per year. All other provisions ofChapter22 remainedthe same. The rule proposed the following emission limits for these smaller sources:

433

### • Electric PowerGenerating System Boilers Coal-fired ; 0.50 IblMMBtu
Number 6 Fuel Oil-fired 0.301blMMBtu
All Others (gaseous or liquid) 0.20 IblMMBtu
• Industrial Boilers 0.20 IblMMBtu

• Process Heaters/Furnaces AmmoniaReformers 0.30 IblMMBtu
All Others 0.18IbIMMBtu

• Stationaty Gas Turbines Peaking Service, Fuel Oil-fired 0.371blMMBtu Peaking Service, Gas-fired 0.27 IblMMBtu

All Others 0.24 IblMMBtu

• Stationaty Internal CombustionEngines Lean-burn 10 g/Hp-hour

Rich-burn 2 g/Hp-hour

The Chapter22NOxrule was designed to achieve approximately40 TPD ofreductions in BRNAonly.
b. Other regulations and programs that reduced NOx (and VOC) emissions after 2002 include: (1) 

### Mobile Source Controls

- Mobile source controls that reduced NOx and VOC emissions included a vehicle inspection and maintenance 

### (lIM) program and federal motor vehicle control programs (FMVCP). All mobile source control programs were modeled with EPA's current version ofthe onroad emissions model, MOBILE6. Below is a briefsummary ofthese mobile source controlprograms. (a) Vehicle 11M Program

- LDEQ promulgated a revision to the low enhanced vehicle 

### 11M program for the BRNA. LDEQ received full approval from EPA for its low enhanced JIM 

### program (Final Rule, 67 FR 60594). The program included gas cap testing and visual antitampering checks on 1980 and newergasoline-fueled cars and trucks weighing less than 

### 10,000 Ibs (gross vehicle weight rating). On-board diagnostic (OBD) testing is conducted on 1996 and newer vehicles. Annual emission testing is conducted using a decentralized network ofcertified motor vehicle inspection stations. 

### (b) Tier 2/Low Sulfur Gasoline Program Credits - The final rule

on Tier 2 motor vehicle emissions standards and sulfur control requirements for passenger cars, light trucks, and medium-duty cars including SUVs and minivans rated between 8,500 and 10,000pounds, was published on February 10,2000 (65 FR 6698). As 

### with the NLEV program, MOBILE6 is configured for estimationofcredits derived from the Tier 2 programbeginningwith calendaryear2004 and later.
(2) Nonroad Source Controls

- Nonroad source controls that reduced NOx and VOC emissions in the BRNA included four federal off-road measures. These measures regulated diesel engines, recreational and commercial marine vessels, and locomotives. Following is a summary of these federal measures:



### 434

### (a) Nonroad Diesel Engines - The final rule on control ofemissions fromnonroad diesel engines was published on October 23, 1998 (63 FR 205). The rule was established to reduce emissions from nonroad diesel engines and equipment by establishing stringent new emissions standards and requirements to ensure that engines maintain their level of emission performance as they age, to provide compliance flexibility to engine and equipment manufacturers, and to establish a voluntary program to encourage the introduction oflow-emitting engines.
(b) 

### Marine Spark-Ignition Engines - The fmal rule for control of emissions from new, gasoline, spark-ignition marine engines was published on October 4, 1996 (61 FR 194). The rule established, beginning in 1998, more stringent standards for manufacture ofengines used in outboards, personal watercraft, andjetboats. (c) Marine Compression-Ignition Engines - The final rule for control ofemissions from new, compression-ignition, marine diesel engines, equal to or greater than 

### 37 kilowatts, was published on December 29, 1999 (64 FR 249). The rule sets emission standards for engines and takes effect between 2004 and 2007, depending onengine size. (d) Locomotives and Locomotive Engines - The final rule for control ofemissions from locomotives and locomotive engines was published on April 16, 1998 (63 FR 73). The rule sets emission standards for engines and includes a variety of compliance and enforcement provisions and regulations concerning thepreemptionofcertain state and local controls for locomotives.

,," 3. Projectthe 2008 RFP MilestoneYearEmissions 

## The 2008 milestone year for BRNA projections are summarized in Table C-3. Each category includes both growth from 2002 to 2008 and controls.

TableC-3' 2008 RFP MilestoneYearEmissions



# . SourceCateeorv NOx. TPD VOC.TPD Point Source (l) 

### 71.2 34.2 AreaJwNonroad Source (Tables B-1 plus C-2) 43.0 48.4 Mobile Source (Tables B-1 plus C-2) 29.0 15.2 Total ProlectedEmissions 143.2 97.8 (l) 

### From 2007 EI, no growth to 2008

D.. Demonstration ofCompliancewith RFP Requirements The EPA Phase II 1997 Eight-Hour Ozone Implementation Rule requires all ozone nonattainment areas classified as moderate

### to reduce NOx and/or VOC emissions by 15% for the period 2002 through 2008. In 

### addition to the 15%, the required reductions must also offset growth and vehicle fleet turnover. To demonstrate compliance with these requirements, the states are to compare the calculated 2008 Target Level ofEmissions to the 2008 Projected Milestone Year Emissions after controls are applied. If the Projected Milestone Year Emissions are less than the Target Level of Emissions, the requirements are satisfied.

BRNA chose to demonstrate compliance with RFP 

### requirements with NOx reductions. Table D-I shows that the requirements are met.

TableD-l: RFP Demonstration for 2008 Description NOx, TPD VOCTPD Target Level of Emissions for 2008 (Table B-3) 164.3 103.5

435

### Projected 2008 RFP Milestone Year Emissions (fable C-3) 143.2 97.8 Are Milestone Year Emissions less than Target Level ofEmissions? Yes Yes Excess 21.1 5.7

E. Contingency Plan In 

### case ofa milestone year attainment failure, the states are required to have a contingency plan that reduces emissions by an additional 3% between the 2008 RFP milestone year and the next calendar year. EPA guidance allows that controlled emission reductions not previously used in the 2008 RFP milestone demonstration may be used to satisfy contingency requirements. Because the excess emission reductions from the 2008 RFP demonstration are greater than the reductionsrequired for 2009 contingency, the 2009 contingencyplan for BRNA does not require any additional controls. A summary ofthe estimated control

.reductions and the required contingencylevel ofreductions is presentedin Table E-l.

D 

### T bl 

### E 1 RFPC

a e 

# - : 

### entmzencv emonstration Description I 

### NO., 

### t'PD VOC,TPD Adiusted 2008 Base Year (Section BA) 193.3 103.5 Required % Contingency 3% NA Required ContingencyReductions in 2009 5.8 NA Excess from 2008 

## RFfDemonstration (Table D-l) 21.1 5.7 Is excess greater than required contingencyreductions? Yes Yes CentinaencyExcess 15.3 5.7

436

## Appendix· Calculation of FMVCP/RVP Reductions

Ozone Season Weekday Emissions, 2002 • 2008 

## NOxMobile Emissions, fPo 

# \/QC**1\fIobfIe·EtnlssIon$~fPO** 

### . , 

### 2002 2002 2008 FMVCP 

### 2002 2002 2008

. i=MVCP Parish ActlJal 

### (1) Adjusted 

### (2) w/2002·**VMTJ~) ~eduction**  

### (4) Actual (1)**AdjlJ~tfJcI (~l**  

### w/2QQ2YIl/IT 

### (31 Reducti91) 

### (4)

Ascension 7.5 8.4 7.3 1.1 3.8 4.2 3.6 0.6

E Baton Rouge 18.9 21.5 19.1 2.4 13.9 15.2 12.9 2.3

Iberville 4.5 5.1 4.3 0.8 2.0 2.2 1.8 0.4
Livingston 8.9 9.9 8.6 1.3 4.4 4.8 4.1 0.7

W Baton Rouge 5.5 6.1 5.3 0.8 2.4 2.6 2.2 0.4

Totals 

### 45.3 51.0 44.6 6.4 26.5 29.0 24.6 4.4

Notes: (1) Peak Ozone Season, RVP 7.8,2002 VMT, 2002 Emission Factors (2) Peak Ozone Season, RVP 7.8, 2002 VMT, 2002 Emission Factors, CM Disabled (3) Peak Ozone Season, RVP 7.8, 2002 VMT, 2008 Emission Factors, CM Disabled (4)

# =(2) - (3) Factors projected from MOBILE6.2.03. The adjustments are due to FMVCP only since the RVP is constant from 2002 to 2008.



### 437Appendix

- Point Sources by Facility

2002 TPYI 2007 TPYI Parish AI# Facility , 

### voe HOx 

### voe NOx 0180 529 UNIVAR USA INC/GEISMAR 2.0 0.0 3.0 0.9 0180 1093 CROMPTONINC/MONOCHEM 10.0 392.0 5.6 158.7 0180 1136 SHELL CHEMICAL LP/GEISMAR PLNT 510.0 739.0 537.8 684.8 0180 1138 GEISMAR VINYLS CO LP 115.0 130.0 110.2 42.8 0180 1433 CROMPTON MFG COINC/GEISMAR PLANT 801.0 100.0 626.2 13.0 0180 1468 RUBICON INC. 236.0 590.0 178.9 422.5 0180 2049 BASF CORPORATION/GEISMAR SITE 268.0 671.0 255.3 822.9 0180 2082 HONEYWELL INTLINC/GEISMARWRKS 24.0 49.0 56.0 79.5 0180 2218 PRAXAIR INC/GEISMAR 19.0 199.0 33.5 216.3 0180 2245 TRIADNITROGEN LLC 66.0 2368.0 0.6 6.2 0180 2398 TRIADNITROGEN LLC/MELAMINE CHEMICALS 6.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0180 2416 CFINDUSTRIES INC./DONALDSONVILLE NITROGEN 228.0 3429.0 199.4 2894.5 0180 2679 AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS INc/GEISMAR SYNGAS 3.0 56.0 4.2 62.2 0180 3302 ELPASO FLO SRVCS CO/RIVERSIDE 94.0 288.0 91.8 171.3 0180 3400 VULCAN CHEMICALS 262.0 1286.0 41.7 212.6 0180 3420 ORMETCORP/ALUMINA PLANT 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0180 3732 PCS NITROGEN FERTIUZER,L.P./GEISMAR SO.O 1329.0 19.2 430.5 0180 3990 WAGNER OIL COCO/DARROW COMM LEASE 36.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0180 4762 ENTERPRISE GAS PROC LLCITEBONE FRAC PLNT 107.0 49.0 174.5 39.2 0180 4803 BFIWASTE SYSTEMS OFN.A.INc/COLONIAL LANDFILL 12.0 11.0 8;5 9.9 0180 5565 WILLIAMS OLEFINS LLC/GEISMAR ETHYLENE 278.0 703.0 246,3 640.4 0180 8142 WAGNER OILCO/DARROW GRC BATTERY 70.0 41.0 11.4 5.0 0180 11416 BRIDGELINE HOLDINGS LP/SORRENTO UNDERGROUND GAS SF 11.0 44.0 17.1 30.2 0180 17771 T T BARGE CLEANING INC/MILE 183 7.1 1.8 11.8 1.0 0180 20S06 ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS CO/SORRENTO PHT 29.0 3.0 27.7 2.8 0180 26272 051 TRANSPORTS INC 13.0 1.0 29.8 0.9 0180 27834 EXXONMOBIL PIPELINE CO/SORRENTO STORAGE 37.0 2.0 37.3 1.2 0180 30073 AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS INc/DINITROTOLUENE 5.0 25.0 5.1 29. 0180 31513 AIR LIOUIDE AMERICA CORP/GEISMAR 3.0 269.0 20.2 106.2 

### . 0180 31514 GABRIEL CHEMICALS LLC/CHLOROSULFONIC ACIDPLANT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0180 33564 CooperT SmithStevedoring Co - America Weigh Rig Loading & TransferFacility na na 0.8 29.2 0180 33579 CoooerT SmithStevedorina Co - FloatinaGrain ElevatorRia#1 na na 0.0 0.0 0180 39945 ORMET CORP/BURNSIDE BULK MARINE TERMINAL 7.0 89.0 0.8 9.0 0180 41417 SHELL PIPELINE COLP/SORRENTODOME STORAGE 6.0 2.0 188.0 1.6 0180 46968 Mid-America Resources·Coro-**Sorrento~Field** Production liaci!itY·, na na, 2A 0.2 0180 67572 DUPONT CHEMICALS/BURNSIDE PLANT 2.0 55.0 2,0 55.1 0180 83718 GULF LIOUIDS NEW RIVER PROJECT LLC/GEISMAR GAS PLNT 24.8 44.0 31.7 54.5 0180 86181 TEXACO PIPELINES LLC/SORRENTOTENDS PUMP STN 15.0 0.0 12.8 0.0 0180 88164 ENTERPRISE PROD OPER LP/SORRENTO RAILRACK 1.0 0.0 5.9 0.2 0180 90203 EOTT ENERGY OPER LP/DARROW CRUDE OILTERM 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0180 92534 BORDEN CHEM INC/FORMALDEHYDE TRAINS & METHANOLTANK FARM 41.0 3.0 56.1 0.8 0180 97675 CHEMTECH CHEMICALS/CHEMICAL BLENDING 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0180 99129 BURLINGTON RESOURCES O&G/UNITED LANDS #1 4.0 1.0 3.8 0.5 0180 100581 WILLIAMS OLEFINS LLC/HC BARGE LOAD 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0180 100651 GULF LIOUIDS NEW RIVER PROJECT/SORRENTO GAS PLANT 5.5 0.2 12.1 1.7 0180 122402 IMTT ' Geismar na na 0.0 0.0 0180 143528 StateLease 17446Tank Batterv - Darrow Field na na 7.9 0.0 0180 143529 SL17446Well- DarrowField na na 2.4 0.3 0180 145270 SorrentoProduction FacilitY na na 3.5 0.1 0840 248 DELTECH CORPORATION 28.0 256.0 38.5 90.8 0840 285 EXXONMOBIL CHEM/BR PLASTICS PLNT 532.0 108.0 199.2 117.2 0840 286 EXXONMOBIL CHEM CO/BR CHEM PLT 1708.0 2486;0 1510.2 2166.6 0840 288 FORMOSA PLASTICS CORPORATION LA 44.0 570.0 80.7 253.0 0840 289 HONEYWELL/BATON ROUGE PLNT 242.0 21.0 269.1 16.4 0840 332 EXXONMOBIUB RMARKETING TERM 36.0 0.0 32.4 0.0 0840 582 PLANTATION PIPELINE CO/BRTANK FARM 1787.0 0.0 634.5 0.0 0840 669 ALBEMARLE CORP. 31.0 11.0 27.0 9.6 0840 1000 ASHLAND CHEM CO/B.R. DISTRIBUTION 6.9 0.0 5.8 0.0 0840 1157 STUPP CORP/BAKER 5.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 0840 1186 ENTERGY GSIILA STN 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0840 1186 ENTERGY/LA STATION 1 51.0 1833.0 52.0 1676.0 0840 1314 RHODIA INC/BR FAC 66.0 74.0 30.5 69.9 0840 1395 DSM COPOL YMERlBR PLANT 78.0 127.0 76.9 197.2 0840 1396 EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES/B RSMELTER 0.0 9.0 1.1 15.7 0840 1413 UOP LLC/BR PLNT 2.0 46.0 2.8 35.0 0840 1516 CLEAN HARBORS BATON ROUGE LLC 7.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0840 2617 GEORGIA PACIFIC/PT HUDSON OPERATNS 334.0 1916.0 629.1 1681.6

438Appendix - Point Sources by Facility

2002 TPYI 2007 TPY) Parish Al# Facilitv 

### voe HOx 

### voe HOx 0180 529 UNIVAR USA INC/GEISMAR 2.0 0.0 3.0 0.9 0840 2638 EXXONMOBIL REF & SUPPLY CO/BR REFINERY 1659.0 3583.0 1545.0 2018.5 0840 3085 ETHYL CORPORATION 1.2 0.0 4.9 0.0 0840 3230 EXXONMOBILCHEM CO/RESIN FINSHNG PLT 14.0 16.0 22.1 14.8 0840 3387 FERRO CORPORATION/BATON ROUGE SITE 18.0 8.0 13.4 8.5 0840 3519 EXXONMOBILCHEM CO/B.R. POL YOLEFINS 101.0 105.0 82.5 111.3 0840 3587 PPG IND INC/GROW AUTOMOTIVE 3.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0840 4407 EBR Parish Renewable EnergvCenter na na 1.7 0.0 0840 4993 BPAMERICA PROD/PT HUDSON GAS PlNT 52.0 20.0 3.5 0.7 0840 5190 ALLWASTE CONTAINER SVCS/BATON ROUGE PLANT 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 0840 5540 LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY 6.4 133.4 6.4 124.5 0840 8007 FLORIDA GASTRANSMISSION CO/ZACHARY COMP STN 73.0 940.0 71.7 363.9 0840 11595FLOWERS BAKING COOFBATON ROUGE LLC 41.4 1.5 51.2 1.8 0840 17129 HILCORP ENERGY CO/COMITE FIELD FACILITY 9.0 9.0 25.0 7.0 0840 22750 EDO SPECIALTY PLASTICS 13.0 0.0 16.8 0.0 0840 25383 LAMAR CORP/ LAMAR GRAPHICS 20.0 0.0 38.4 0.0 0840 27559 BAYOU COATING LLC 2.0 2.0 27.2 6.2 0840 29884GREAT LAKES CARBON CORP/B RCALONED COKE PLT 8.5 380.0 5.5 361.9 0840 31128 EastBaton Rouge Parish Landfill(BFI North) na na 4.2 5.5 0840 32045VINTAGE PETROLEUM INC/MANCHAC POINT 85.0 19.0 16.0 22.0 0840 32050SCHERING-PLOUGH ANIMAL HEALTH CORPNET OPERATIONS 2.1 0.7 0.0 0.0 0840 32056 EXXON MOBIL CORP/EMPR 7.0 4.0 5.0 1.3 0840 88139 BPAMERICA PROD/PT HUDSON CTB 30.0 14.0 21.4 12.2 0840 90176 B P PIPEUNES NORTH AMERICA/PT HUDSON TERMINAL 40.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0840 95859 UniversItY Reid Production Facilltv na na 28.2 9.6 0840 96336 USComposite Pipe South LLC - Baton RougePlant na na 5.5 4.6 0840 98136 HILCORP ENERGY CO/COBB #1 COMITE FIELD 1.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 0840 114658Sieaen Production Facllitv• Sleaen Field na na 32.0 9.5 0840 114659 PortHudson Field Production FacilItY na na 34.2 0.2 0840 119007DuolantlerTank Batterv - UniversItY Field na na 10.0 24.0 0840 ., 119008Nelson Tank Battery - UniversityField na na 24.0 18.0 0840 138716North BurtvilieField Fadlitv - North Burtvlile Field na na 16.9 8.4 0840",,- 144826Crown Paper#1 Production FacilItY

- ProfitIsland Field na na 14.8 7.5 0840 146877Crown Paoer#1 Treating FacilItY - Profit Island Reid na na 5.2 13.5 1280 1306CORATEXAS MFG INc/SUGAR MILL 14.0 215.0 14.0 . 221.0 1280 1409 DOW CHEMICAL CO/LA OPERATIONS 1270.0 8611.0 1404.4.• 4582.7 1280 1607ATOFINA PETROCHEMICALS INc/COSMAR STYRENE PlNT 98.0 682.0 121.7- 373.7 1280 2043 WILLIAMS FIELD SERVICES/CHOCTAWTERMINAL 18.0 12.0 18.2' r;.- 10.6 1280 2367 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION INC/ST.GABRIEL PLANT 257.0 215.0 215.1" 231.9 1280 2455 GEORGIAGULF CHEM & VINYLS LLC/PLAQUEMINE 139.0 1265.0 170.4 1181.4 1280 2625 ENTERGY GSIIWILLOW GLEN 103.0 2437.0 10.0 208.0 1280 2644 PIONEER AMERICAS INC 0.3 16.7 1.6 26.0 1280 3129ASHLAND CHEMICAL CO/PLAOUEMINE METHANOL PlNT 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 1280 3263 AIRPRODUCTS & CHEMICALS INC/ST.GABRIEL 12.0 64.0 37.6 73.6 1280 3492 LBC BATON ROUGE LLC/SUNSHINE TERM 58.0 1.0 104.1 3.3 1280 4197 SOUTHERN NATURALGAS/WHITE CASTLE CS 20.0 404.0 65.5 174.8 1280 5176ATOFINA PETROCHEM INC/CARVILLE POLYSTYRENE 4.0 33.0 17.6 22.1 1280 7359TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION LPIWHITE CASTLE CS 3.0 180.0 1.7 0.0 1280 8055 State of loUisianaMilitary - GillisW Long Center na na 0.9 14.1 1280 8056 Plaquemine PointShipyard na na 16.2 6.0 1280 8072 GRUY PETROLEUM MGMT CO/BAYOU BOUILLON PF 15.0 60.0 0.0 0.0 1280 14139 PLAINS MARKETING LP/ST GABRIELTERMINAL 12.0 0.0 12.1 0.0 1280 14535INEOS FLUOR AMERICAS LLC/KLEA·134A PLANT 1.9 15.6 2.5 14.9 1280 17383 LAINTRASTATE GAS CO./MYRTlE GROVE C.S. 10.0 19.0 24.8 11.6 1280 19184 UG UQUIDSCOLLC/PLAQUEMINE GAS 5.0 151.0 46.6 117.3 1280 20411 TEXAS PETRO INVESTMENT CO/BAYOU BLEU FLD PROD 69.0 113.0 19.9 60.4 1280 24479SCS Iberville Coatings Inc na na 2.3 1.5 1280 26034 LAENERGY & POWER AUTHORITY/PLAQUEMINE STEAM & DIESEL PWR PLT 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.3 1280 26984CIBA SPECIALTY/ST. GABRIEL PLANT 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.5 1280 27495 BIOPRODUCTS OF LALLc/GULF COAST 15.4 1.7 0.1 0.1 1280 32133 G& A INTERNATIONAl/BAYOU SORREL 23.0 43.0 22.8 19.5 1280 32135 JPOILCO/WHITE CASTLE FLD 37.0 37.0 39.1 23.3 1280 32141 BRIDGEUNE HOLDINGS LPITALL Y HO CS 1.0 1.0 0.2 0.2 1280 32145 HILCORP ENERGY CO/NW BAYOU CHOCTAW 47.0 16.0 3.6 2.9 1280 32146 BUGH PETROLEUM INC/BAYOU CHOCTAW FLD PROD FAC 8.4 32.8 0.0 0.0 1280 32154 JPOILCO/GRAND RIVER 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1280 32160 Bavou BleuFieldProduction Facilltv na na 9.8 25.7 1280 32161 OLEUM OPERATING CO LC/BYU HENRY FLD PF 8.3 14.6 8.2 14.5 1280 33667 Basic IndustriesInc - Sandblast & SprayPaint Yard na na 9.9 7.0 1280 39633 Command services Inc na na 38.6 23.4

439Appendix - Point Sources 

### by Facility

2002 TPYI 2007 TPYI Parish AI# Fac;lIitv 

### vOt NO,x VOC Nox 0180 529 UNIVAR USA INC/GEISMAR 2.0 0.0 3.0 0.9 1280 39978 KINDER MORGAN L10UIDS TERMINAL LLC/ST GABRIEL TERMINAL 18.3 0.0 12.7 0.5 1280 40037 NOBLE ENERGY INC/STATE LEASE 14371 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.5 1280 51854CARVILLE ENERGY LLC/CARVILLE ENERGY CENTER 2.0 18.0 1.2 347.2 1280 843n OLEUM OPERATING CO LC/BAYOU DES GLAISE5-WILBERT MINERAL BLEASE 7.4 30.0 0.0 0.0 1280 84483 HILCORP ENERGY CO/FROG LAKE 14.0 29.0 0.0 0.0 1280 85393 PETRO HUNT LLC/BYU HENRY CTL FAC 36.0 48.0 14.0 0.0 1280 85652AEP CORPNENTURES LEASE CO/PLAQUEMINE COGEN 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1280 86585 SHELL PIPELINE COLP/GRAND RIVER BARGE LOADING 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1280 89237 INEOS LLCIINEOS OXIDE 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1280 89512 E&E PRODUCTION COIDUGAS So. LEBLANC LTDETAL #1 3.0 0.0 20.6 5.0 1280 90197 EOTT ENERGY PIPELINE LP/BAYOU BLUE CRUDE OILTERM 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1280 101588PETROQUEST ENERGY LLC/EEX CORP PF#1 20.0 11.0 30.2 10.9 1280 113166 BayOU Bouillon Production FacilItY na na 11.7 11.9 1280 118389BayOU B1eu • Central FadlltY#1 na na 10.1 7.3 1280 119219WhiteCastle DeepProduction Facllltv na na 32.1 3.7 1280 128487 Dentetal #1 Production Facilitv- Musson Reid na na 16.3 0.8 1280 126578Shinteeh Louisiana LLC

- Plaouemine PVC Plant na na 0.0 0.0 1280 126748SChwing 10 Production Facility- Frog LakeField na na 14.2 2.7 1280 126750 DowChemical CoProduction Fadlltv

- Frog LakeReid na na 8.3 7.8 1280 128638ForestHomePartnership Facilitv na na 15.5 22.8 1280 134264GuevmardProduction Fadlitv

- St Gabriel Reid na na 16.3 17.4 1280 138856StGabriel DehvSo. NGL Production Facilitv na na 15.9 0.2 1280 139760 BayOU Bouillion etal #1 Production Facilltv na na 0.0 0.0 1740 1467 EASTJORDAN IRON WORKS 3.0 14.0 2.1 4.9 1740 4990 BPAMERICA PROD/LOCKHARTCROSSING CF# 1 12.0 38.0 10.6 12.9 1740 6858 GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES INC 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.6 1740 9154 THESHAW GROUP/SUNLAND FABRICATORS 14.0 0:0 67.7 15.5 1740 11767WASTE MANAGEMENT OFLA LLC/WOODSIDE LANDFILL 37.0 12;0 4.0 8.9 1740 17042 DENBURY RESOURCES INC/LOCKHART CROSS WILCOX CF3 121.0 125.0 24.9 10.2 1740 19875WEYERHAEUSER CO/HOLDEN SAWMILLSo. LOG PROCESS 219.0 22;0 223.9 19.4

.- 1740 26884 PLAINS MARKETING LP/LOCKHART CROSSING 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1740 32465 TMREXPLORATION INC/ LVG WXI RASULB 19.6 0.2 25.0 1.1 1740 32466 ErvaS Mayers # 1 na na 0.0 0.0 1740 80537 DELTA ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCTS INC 20.8 0.0 19.8 1.5



## - 1740 99952 O'M Barnett#2 Fadlitv - LockhartCrossina Field na na 0.8 0.0 1740 120886SL7729#2Wellsite - LockhartCrossino Field na na 1.9 0.0 1740 130526BlindRiverFedlltvCSL 18562 #1 Well)

- Blind RiverFleld'Block-16 '--" 

## -
o -na 0_ na_. o 0 0.0 0.0 1740 146741 lockhart Crossing Central Processing Faciltv -na- na 0.0 0.0 3120 302 T.T. BARGE SERVICE MILE237 LLC/BR SHIPYARD 34.8 7.8 12.6 3.3 3120 858 EXXONMOBIL REF So. SUPPLY COl ANCHORAGE TNKFRM 32.0 0,0 25.2 2.5 3120 1648CASTROLCONSUMER N AMER AUTO INCIPTALLEN 16;5 3.3 17.4 7.6 3120 2366 PLAOD REFINING COLLC/PTALLEN 204.0 967.0 240.7 743.9 3120 2519 DSM COPOLYMER/ADDIS PLANT 493,0 163;0 0.0 0.0 3120 2937 Shaw55&.5 Fabricators Inc

0 AddisFacilitv na na 5.3 9.5 3120 3473 SHINTECH LOUISIANA LLC/ADDIS PLANT B 1.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 3120 4056 HARRY L. LAWS So. COINC/ONCLARE CENTRAL FACTORY 10.0 121:0 0.0 0.0 3120 4174 SIDRICHARDSON CARBON CO/ADDIS PLT 307.0 220.0 99.0 326.9 3120 9495 DISCOVERY ALUMINAS INC/ALCOA PORTALLEN WORKS 35.0 30.0 52.5 30.6 3120 11059SoedaltvApplication Services Inc

- Port AllenFacilltv na na 7.6 4.8 3120 12096WestwavTerminalCoInc na na 0.1 0.3 3120 17161 EXXONMOBIL PROD CO/BR GAS PLANT 26.0 114.0 17.9 63.8 3120 19338 PETROLEUM FUR So.TERM/PORTALLEN 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 3120 19556 INTERCONTINENTALTERMINALS CO/ANCHORAGE CHEM TERM 1.8 0.3 0.0 0.0 3120 25344Criterion CatalYsts So.Technolooies LP- HPA Port Allen Plant na na 8.1 7.7 3120 26217 INTLPAINTING CORP 35.0 0.0 29.8 0.0 3120 40198 B R FRACTIONATORS/PLT 1 21.0 42.0 18.8 60.7 3120 43634TRINITYMARINE PRODUCTS INC/PLANT48 14.0 4.0 9.5 0.2 3120 83425SHINTECH LOUISIANA LLC/ADDISPLANTA 31.0 34.0 42.5 32.2 3120 98796 EXXONMOBIL PIPELINE CO/ANCHORAGE TERMINAL 8.0 0.0 11.2 0.1 3120 126510Bueche HeirsWell #1 Fadlltv SN228905- Profit Island Oil Field na na 10.8 8.1 3120 139063Oliver#1 Tank Battery - Profit Island Field na na 21.5 7.9 Column Total 14860.0 42415.0 12492.8 26000.4
1. 2002 emissions from"2002Base Year EmissionsInventoryfor the Baton RougeNonatlainrnent Area" dated June 2007 2. 2007 emissions from LDEQERICdatabase.

440

## Appendix. Calculation of Area Source Growth

-. AREA SOURCE· OZONE SEASON WEEKDAY EMISSIONS**jij~dG~:.** Growth Factor 08 Estimated Emissions Growth 

### see Description NOx (TPP) 

### '()C (TPD) 02·08 NOx (TPD) 

### voe (TPD) NOx (TPD) 

### voe (TPD\ 2103006000 Commerciaillnstitution - Natural Gas 0.21 0.01 1.0971 0.23 0.01 0.02 0.00 2104006000 Residential - Natural Gas 0.79 0.05 1.0507 0.83 0.05 0.04 0.00 2104007000 Residential - LPG 0.06 0.00 1.0260 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 2104008000 Residential-Wood Fireplaces 0.04 1.24 1.0012 0.04 1.24 0.00 0.00 2104008010 Residential-Woodstoves - General 0.03 0.56 1.0012 0.03 0.56 0.00 0.00 2104008050 Residential-Woodstoves

- Non-Catalytic 0.01 1.0012 0.01 0.00 2302002100 Commercial Cooklnq - Conveyorized Charbrolllnq 0.01 1.1251 0.01 0.00 2302002200 Commercial Cooking - Underfired Charbroiling 0.04 1.1251 0.05 0.01 2302003000 Commercial Cooklnq - Deep Fat Frying 0.01 1.1251 0.01 0.00 2302003100 Commercial Cooking - Flat Griddle Frying 0.01 1.1251 0.01 0.00 2401001000 Surface Coatings - Architectural Coatings 2.77 1.0880 3.01 0.24 2401005000 Surface Coatings

- Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532 0.83 1.1390 0.95 0.12 2401008000 Surface Coatings - Traffic Markers 0.15 1.0448 0.16 0.01 2401015000 Surface Coatings - Factory Finished Wood 0.02 1.2328 0.02 0.00 2401025000 Surface Coatings - Metal Furniture: SIC 25 0.02 1.4386 0.03 0.01 2401040000 Surface Coatings - Metal Cans: SIC 341 0.03 1.2763 0.04 0.01 2401050000 Surface Coatings

- Miscellaneous Finished Metals 4.50 1.2763 5.74 1.24 2401055000 Surface Coatings - Machinery and Equipment 0.06 1.4077 0.08 0.02 2401065000 Surface Coatings - Electronic and Other: SIC 36-363 0.04 1.3941 0.06 0.02 2401070000 Surface Coatings

- MotorVehicles: SIC 371 0.04 1.3117 0.05 0.01 2401080000 Surface Coatings - Marine: SIC 373 1.30 1.2909 1.68 0.38 2401090000 Surface Coatings - Miscellaneous Manufacturing 0.18 1.2407 0.22 0.04 2401100000 Surface Coatings - Industrial Maintenance Coatings 0.24 1.2328 0.30 0.06 2401200000 Surface Coatlnqs

- Other Special Purpose Coatinqs 0.23 1.0285 0.24 0.01 2415000000 Degreasing - All Processes, All Industries 1.14 1.2764 1.46 0.32 2420000000 Dry Cleaning - All Processes 0.88 1.1177 0.98 0.10 2425000000 Graphic Arts - All Processes 0.42 1.0754 0.45 0.03 2460100000 Consumer and Commercial Products - Personal Care 1.81 1.0094 1.83 0.02 2426020000 Consumer and Commercial Products - Household 0.62 1.0094 0.63 0.01 2460400000 Consumer and Commercial Products - Automotive 1.10 1.0094 1.11 0.01 2460500000 Consumer and Commercial Products - All Coatings 0.84 1.0094 0.85 0.01 2460600000 Consumer and Commercial Products - All Adhesives 0.46 1.0094 0.46 0.00 2460800000 Consumer and Commercial Products - FIFRA Related 1.50 1.0094 1.51 0.01 2460900000 Consumer and Commercial Products - Miscellaneous 

### .i 

## i id 0.06 1.0094 0.06 0.00 i

.**~:"** I 2461021000 Commercial

- Cutback Asphalt 0.43 1.2986 0.56 0.13 2461850000 Commercial- Pesticide Application 0.01 1.0494 0.01 0.00

1 \ l 441,

## Appendix- Calculation of Area Source Growth

AREA SOURCE

-**OZO~E** SEASON WEEKDAY EMISSIONS



# . - .... -...,..•..;.,. ..-.,,""'"

# ",_. I Hi:**~'P** l;ellJijioliii!EinJSoIoillt';(l

......... 

## lllli

..

# l'!l!Ivwd' ;'liE· ,:. NOJ(lTI'D)" 

## .1/!lCf!l'!!lNOx (TPDj 

## vocm'Dl 

## SO n!,qriPtiQrt

...".

••.Q"",

. ", 2501060050 Gas Service Stations

- Staae 1:Total 0.19 1.0448 0.20 0.Q1 2501060052 Gas Service Stations - Staae 1:Splash Fillina 0.45 1.0448 0.47 0.02 2501060053 Gas Service Stations

- Stage 1 :Submerged Filling 0.02 1.0448 0.02 0.00 2501060201 Gas Service Stations - UST: Breathing and Emptying 0.96 1.0448 1.00 0.04 2501080050 Airports Aviation Fuel - Staae 1:Total 0.19 1.3117 0.25 0.06 2501080100 Airports Aviation Fuel - Stage 2:Total 0.01 1.3117 0.01 0.00 2505000120 Petroleum Transport

- All Transport Types 0.03 1.0448 0.03 0.00 2505030120 Petroleum Transport

- Trucks 0.13 

### 1.Q448 0.14 0.01 2601000000 Onsite Incineration - All Categories 0.24 0.24 1.0094 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.00 2601020000 Onsite Incineration

- Comrnercialdnsfitutional 0.42 0.42 1.2986 0.55 0.55 0.13 0.13 2610000100 Open Buming - Yard Waste: Leaves 0.03 1.0094 0.03 0.00 2610000400 Open Burning - Yard Waste: Brush 0.02 1.0094 0.02 0.00 2610000500 Open Burnlna - Land Clearina: Debris 0.51 1.17 1.Q094 0.51 1.18 0.00 0.01 2610030000 Open Burning - Residential 0.14 

### O.lO 1.0094 0.14 0.71 0.00 0.01 2620030000 Landfill - Municipal 0.01 0.06 1.2796 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.02 2630020000 Wastewater Treatment

- Publicly Owned


## - 0.40 1.0717 0.43 0.03 28015Q0170 Agricultural Buming

- Whoie Field on Fire:Grass 0.00 0.01 1.0494 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 2801500250 Agricultural Buming

-WhQle Field on Fire:Sugarcane 1.23 2.45 1.0494 1.29 2.57 0.06 0.12 2801500261 Aaricultural Bumina-Wbole Field on Fire:Wheat Headfire 0.03 0.05 1.0494 0.03 0.05 0.00 0.00 2801500262 Agricultural Buming:-WhoJe Field on Fire:Wheat Backfire 0.01 0.02**1.04~4** 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 2810001000 Other Combustion

- ForestWildfires 0.17 0.38 1.0094 0.17 0.38 0.00 0.00 2810015000 Other Combustion-I?rescribed Burning:Forest Management 0.03 0.37 1.0094 0.03 0.37 0.00 0.00**28100~000O** Other Combustion

- Structure Fires 0.00 0.02 1.1809 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 Column Total 

### 3.92 29.94 4.18 

### 33.23 0.26 3.29

1. 2002 Emissions from "2002 Base Year Emissions Inventory for the Baton Rouge Nonattainment Area" dated June 2007 2. Growth factors from EGAS 5.0 ' 3. SCC Classifications with no estimated emissions are blank.

442

## Appendix· Calculation of Nonroad Source Growth

NONROAD SOURCE· OZONE SEASON WEEKDAY EMISSIONS 

## 2002 Growth Factor

## na Estimated Emissiom Growth SCC Description NOx (TPD) VOC (TPD) 02·08 NOx (TPD) VOC (TPD) NOx (TPD) VOC(TPD 2260000000 Gasoline except Rail and Marine· 2 Stroke 2260001010 Recreational Equipment

- Motorcycles:Offroad 0.00 0.72 1.0143 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.01 2260001030 Recreational Equipment - All Terrain Vehicles 0.00 0.71 1.0143 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.01 2260002000 Construction & Mining, Total 0.00 0.30 1.0143 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 2260004000 Lawn & Garden, All 0.00 1.49 1.0143 0.00 1.51 0.00 0.02 2260006000 Commercial Equipment 0.00 0.13 1.0143 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 2260007005 Logging Equipment- Chain Saws, >6HP 0.00 0.06 1.0143 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 2265000000 Gasoline except Rail and Marine· 4 Stroke. 2265001010 Recreational Eguipment • Motorcycles:Off-Road 0.00 0.02 1.0143 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 2265001030 Recreational Eguipment - All Terrain Vehicles 0.02 0.18 1.0143 0.02 0.18 0.00 0.00 2265001050 Recreational Eguipment - Golf Carts 0.00 0.01 1.0143 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 2265002000 Construction & Mining, Total 0.02 0.16 1.0143 0.02 0.16 0.00 0.00 2265003000 Industrial Equipment, All 0.08 0.06 1.0143 0.08 0.06 0.00 0.00 2265004000 Lawn & Garden, All 0.24 1.29 1.0143 0.24 1.31 0.00 0.02 2265006000 Commercial Equipment 0.17 0.71 1.0143 0.17 0.72 0.00 0.01 2265007010 Logging Equipment

- Shredders >6Hp 0.00 0.02 1.0143 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 2265010010 Industrial Equipment - Oil Field Equipment 0.01 0.03 1.0143 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.00 2267000000 LPG Equipment except Rail and Marine 2267002000 Construction & Mining, All 0.01 0.00 1.0490 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 2267003000 Industrial Equipment, All 0.92 0.23 1.0490 0.97 0.24 0.05 0.01 2267004066 Lawn & Garden Equipment

- Chippers/Stump Grinders (Com 0.01 0.00 1.0490 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 2267006000 Commercial Equipment 0.07 0.01 1.0490 0.07 0.01 0.00 0.00 2268000000 CNG Equipment except Rail and Marine 2268003020 Industrial Equipment

- Forklifts 0.06 0.00 1.0490 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 2268006000 Commercial Equipment 0.07 0.00 1.0490 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 2268010010 Industrial Equipment - Oil Field Equipment 0.03 0.16 1.0490 0.03 0.17 0.00 0.01 2270000000 CI Equipment except Rail and Marine· Diesel 2270002000 Construction & Mining, Total 7.66 0.79 1.0143 7.77 0.80 0.11 0.01 2270003000 Industrial Equipment, All 0.53 0.07 1.0143 0.54 0.07 0.01 0.00 2270004000 Lawn & Garden, All 0.10 0.02 1.0143 0.10 0.02 0.00 0.00 2270005000 Agricultural Equipment, All ' 0.39 0.05 1.0143 0.40 0.05 0.01 0.00 2270006000 Commercial Equipment 0.41 0.07 1.0143 0.42 0.07 0.01 0.00 2270007015 Logging Equipment

- Forest Equipment:Feller?Bunch/Skidder 0.13 0.01 1.0143 0.13 0.01 0.00 0.00 2270008005 Airport Ground Support Equipment ,"'.' 

### . 0.02 , 0.00

" 1.0143 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 2270010010 Industrial Equipment - Oil Field Equipment 0.10 0.01 1.0143 0.10 0.01 0.00 0.00 2275020000 Commercial Aircraft 0.13 0.02 1.3117 0.17 0.03 0.04 0.01



### 443 1

## Appendix· Calculation of Nonroad Source Growth

NONROAD SOURCE

- OZONE SEASON WEEKDAY EMISSIONS

# ~"1l1!2**il~t!** 

# ... .I!J»la...... ,<i'-**~c** 

### t'leJ,c:,Oothm 

### tiQ'S,L1J»Jn ){QG,C

. ' ',,,**O~,- ',lf~frfJ»:** **YQC1I~1 ,NO~**  

### (Tptll YOC (TPP 2275050000 General Aviation 0.00 0.01 1.3117 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 2275060000 Air Taxi 0.00 0.01 1.3117 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 2280002100 Commercial Marine Vessels· Diesel:Port Emissions 5.72 0.14 1.0747 6.15 0.15 0.43 0.01 2280002200 Commercial Marine Vessels - Diesel:Underway Emissions 4.10 0.09 1.0747 4.41 0.10 0.31 0.01 2280003100 Commercial Marine Vessels - Residual:Port Emissions 8.95 0.32 1.2214 10.93 0.39 1.98 0.07 2280003200 Commercial Marine Vessels - Residual:UnderWay Emissions 1.62 0.05 1.2214 1.98 0.06 0.36 0.01 

### 2282000000 Recreational Marine/Pleasure Craft· All Fuels 2282005010 Pleasure Craft - Gasoline, 2·Stroke, Outboard 0.18 5.64 1.0143 0.18 5.72 0.00 0.08 2282005015 Pleasure Craft - Gasoline, 2-Stroke, Personal Water Craft 0.02 0.89 1.0143 0.02 0.90 0.00 0.01 2282010005 Pleasure Craft - Gasoline, 4-Stroke, Inboard/Stemdrive 0.16 0.29 1.0143 0.16 0.29 0.00 0.00 2282020005 Pleasure Craft - Diesel, Inboard/Stemdrive 0.11 0.00 1.0143 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 2285002006 Railroad Equipment- Diesel, Line Haul Locomotives '2.42 0.13 1.2017 2.91 0.16 0.49 0.03 2285002010 Railroad Eauipment- Diesel, Yard Locomotives 0.44 0.03 1.2017 0.53 0.04 0.09 0.01 2285002015 Railroad Equipment - Diesel, Railway Maintenance 0.02 0.00 1.2017 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 Column Total 

### 34.92 14.93 38.82 15.29 3.90 0.36
1. 2002 Emissions from "2002 Base Year Emissions Inventory for the Baton Rouge Nonattainment Area" dated June 2007 2. EGAS 5.0 growth factors for Aircraft, Commercial Marine, and Railroad classifications. 3. Growth for all other categories was projected from EGAS 4.0 factors.

444 

### 2

## Appendix

- Calculation of Mobile Source Growth

MOBILE SOURCE - OZONE SEASON WEEKDAY EMISSIONS Mobile NOx Emissions Mobile VOC Emissions Growth Growth Parish 2002 (1) 2008 (2) 2002-08 2002 (1) 2008 (2) 2002-08

Ascension 7.5 5.1 -2.4 3.8 3.3 -0.5

E. Baton Rouge 18.9 12.4 -6.5 13.9 9.0 -4.9

Iberville 4.5 3.1 -1.4 2.0 1.5 -0.5
Livingston 8.9 6.1 -2.8 4.4 3.4 -1.0

W. Baton Rouge 5.5 2.9 -2.6 2.4 1.5 -0.9 Total, tpd 45.3 29.6 -15.7 26.5 18.7 -7.8
(1) Peak Ozone Season, RVP 7.8, 2002 VMT and Emission Factors (2) Peak Ozone Season, RVP 7.8, 2008 VMT and Emission Factors Growth factors projected from MOBILE6.2.03 .

.•

445

### AppendixH
RACM/RACT.Analysis



### Section 185 Fee Determination of Termination, BatonRougeNonattainmentArea Technical Amendment

TA, September2010

### 1



## RACM/RACT Analysis
Summary
LDEQ has performed an analysis to evaluate emissionlevels ofoxides ofnitrogen (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and theirrelationships to the application of current and anticipated control measures expected to be implemented in the five-parish BatonRougemoderate ozone nonattainment area.

Section 172(c)(

### 1) ofthe Act requires SIPs to provide for the implementation ofall reasonably available control measures (RACM) as necessary to provide for attainment of the ozone standard as expeditiously as practicable. EPA has previouslyprovided guidance interpreting the RACM requirements of172(c)(1) in the General Preamble (57 FR 13498, 13560). In 

### the General Preamble, EPA indicatedits interpretation ofsection 172(c)(1),underthe 1990 Amendments, as imposing aduty on States to considerall available control measures and to adopt and implement such measures as are reasonably available for implementationin theparticularnonattainment area. EPA also retainedits pre-1990 interpretation ofthe RACM provisions that wheremeasures that might in fact be available forimplementationin the nonattainment area but couldnot be implemented

on a schedule that would advance the date for attainment in the area, EPA wouldnot consideritreasonable to require implementation ofsuch measures. EPAindicatedthat a State couldreject certain measures as not reasonably available for various reasons related to local conditions. A State could include area-specific reasons forrejecting ameasure as RACM, such that the rejectedmeasurewouldnot advance the attainment date, or technological and economic feasibility in the area.

The EPA issued amemorandum concerning this topic, "Guidance on the Reasonably Available Control Measures (RACM) Requirements and AttainmentDemonstration Submissions for Ozone Nonattainment Areas," by John Seitz, Director, Office ofAir QualityPlanning and Standards, dated November 30, 1999. In 

### this memorandum, EPA states that in order to determinewhethera state has adopted all RACM necessary for attainment and as expeditiously aspracticable, the state will need toprovidejustification as to whymeasures withinthe arena ofpotential reasonable measures have not been adopted. Thejustificationwould need to support that ameasurewas not reasonably available for that area and could be based on technological or economic grounds.

Basedon a review and analysis ofemissionreductions from potentially available control measures, the LDEQ concludes that these evaluated control measures are not RACM for the BatonRouge area, because (a) some would require an intensive and costly effort for

numerous small area sources, or (b) 

### these measures wouldnot produce emission reductions sufficientto advance the attainment date in the Baton Rouge area, and therefore, should not be consideredRACM underthe Act.
LDEQ reachedthis conclusionprimarilybecause the reductions that couldbe achieved by the potentialRACM measures are extremely small. These potential reductions are far

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010

### 2



### less than the emissions reductions needed within the nonattainment area to reach attainment.

In 

### addition, the Baton Rouge attainment demonstrationrelies on emissionreductions from outsidethe nonattainment area (East Feliciana, Pointe Coupee, St. Helena and West Feliciana) to reach attainment, as well as federal rules. The attainment demonstration for the Baton Rouge area indicates that the ozone benefit expectedto be achieved from regionalNOx

### reductions is substantial. Since the reductions from potential RACM

measures do not nearly equate to the reductions needed to maintain attainment, none of these unadopted measures could advance the attainmentdate priorto full implementation ofall other required measures in the Baton Rouge area. More importantly, the implementedNOx reductions in the Baton Rouge area were sufficient for the Baton Rouge area to meet the NAAQS for ozone in 2008. Thus, none ofthese potential
measures should be considered RACM for the Baton Rouge area.

Mobile Sources Analysis

On-road Mobile This subsection ofthe overall RACM analysis is presented for evaluatingpotential onroad mobile emissionreductions that could be achieved through implementationof transportation control measures (TCMs) in the Baton Rouge nonattainment area. LDEQ has analyzed forRACM purposes abroadrange ofTCMs that are identified and listed in Section 108(f) ofthe CAAA. This abbreviated analysis ofTCMs is taken from the most recent and comprehensive TCM evaluation study] that exists for the BatonRouge metropolitan area and reflects updated attainment year vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and emissionreduction estimates.

The basic methodology employedto analyze TCM RACM for the BatonRouge area consists ofthe following procedure: 1. Estimatethe percentage ofVOC and NOx emissions from the vehicletypes affected by TCM implementation (light-duty vehicles, 80% and 70% ofthe VOC and NOx emissions respectively); 2. Apply the percentages from step 1 above to the total on-roadmobile emissions to determine in tons per day the light-duty vehicle fleet emissions in the nonattainment area; 3. Calculate the daily VOC and NOx emissions from light-duty vehicles in tons per mile by dividing the daily emissions (tons/day) by the attainment year VMT (mi/day); 4. Using the projectedVMT reductionpercentages from the TCM analysis, calculate the reduction in VMT for each TCM analyzed; 5. For each TCM, estimate the emission reductions in tons perday based on the corresponding reductions in VMT, and lastly; 6. Determine ifTCM implementation is feasible for RACM purposes in the Baton Rouge nonattainment area.

I Woodward Clyde Consultants, An Evaluation ofTransportation ControlMeasuresfor the Baton Rouge NonattainmentArea, Final Report, June 1995.
RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010

### 3



### The results ofsteps 1-3 ofthe analysis methodology are shownin Table A. The potential ozone-precursoremissionreductions from each ofthe TCMs are derived from steps 4-5 and are summarized in Table B.



### TableA Baton Rouge Attainment Year Mobile Source Emissions, Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), and

### Llzht-Dutv Vehicle Contributions to Total VOC and NOxEmissions.

Total 2005 On-Road Estimated Emissions from Attainment Daily Emissions from Mobile Emissions (tpd) Light-Duty Vehicles (tpd) YearVMT Light-Duty Vehicles (mi/day) (tons/mi) VOC NOx VOC(80%) NOx (70%) VOC NOx

16.14 35.72 12.91 25.00 16,775,710 7.70E-7 1.49E-6



### TableD TCM RACM Summary: Projected 2005 VMT and Emission Reductions for the Baton RON . A

oU2e zone onattamment rea. :;,'j

- 

### Projected Projected TCM Descriptions VMT VMT Projected Emission Reductions Reductions Reductions (tpd) (%i 

### (mi/day) VOC NOx 1 MarketBased TCMs 5.40 905,888 0.70 1.35 2 Activity Centers 4.50 754,907 0.58 1.13 3 ParkingManagement 3.50 587,150 0.45 0.88 4 Vehicle UseLimitations 2.80 469,720 0.36 0.70 5 Telecommuting 1.50 251,636 0.19 0.38 6 Trip Reduction 0.90 150,981 0.19 0.23 7 Employer-Based 0.90 150,981 0.12 0.23 8 Flexible WorkHours 0.90 150,981 0.12 0.23 9 HOVFacilities 0.50 83,879 0.06 0.13 10 Park-and-RidelFringe 0.45 75,491 0.06 0.11 11 Area Rideshare Program 0.28 46,972 0.04 0.07 12 Improved Public Transit 0.20 33,551 0.03 0.05 13 BicyclelPedestrian 0.01 1,678 <0.01 <0.01 14 Traffic Flow Improvements' 

### 0.00 0 N/A N/A Totals: 21.84 3,663,815 2.82 5.46

2 Values shown are those selected for the TCM emissions benefits calculations where percentile ranges
were noted in the Woodward Clyde analysis.

3 There are no VMT reductions associated with traffic flow improvements and emissions benefits due to congestionreliefwere not quantified in the Woodward Clyde study.

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010

### 4



### Table B is sorted in descending order and reflects from top to bottom the most effective TCM categories that were originally analyzed in the study. The results ofthis updated TCM analysis closelymatch the projected emission-reductionbenefits from the analysis. It 

### is evident from the data in the table that there is considerable variation 

### in the potential for achieving emissionreductions accordingto TCM category. Ofall TCMs analyzed, categories 1-5 offer the greatestpotential forreducing on-roadmobile emissions in the Baton Rouge Metropolitan area. Packagedtogether, these five categories account for about 85% ofthe total projected VMT and emissionreductions. However, because ofthe low to medium cost effectiveness (per ton ofNOx reduced) estimated historicallyfor these types ofmeasures, it is highlyunlikelythat any ofthese five TCMs wouldbe implemented in the Baton Rouge area. Excluding trip reduction ordinances and HOV lanes, the remainderofthe TCMs has the mostpotential for actual implementation in the Baton Rouge nonattainment area. 

## In addition to fairly routine traffic flow improvementprojects, flexible work-hour and employer-basedprograms, rideshareprograms, public transit upgrades, and bicycle/pedestrianprojects wouldprovide air qualitybenefits through the year 2008 and beyond. This analysis indicates that these types oftransportation control measures could hypotheticallyreduce VMT by2.8 percent and consequentlyreduce mobile source NOx emissions by about 0.7 tons perday.

Relative to the total NOx reductions required to maintain attainment ofthe I-hour and 8- hourozone standard, additional NOx reductions from other TCMs in the BatonRouge

areathat mightbe implemented constitute a very small percentage ofthe total required reductions (-1%). Therefore, LDEQ concludes that forRACM purposes the TCMs analyzed would not produce emissionreductions 

### sufficienttoadvance the attainmentdate' withoutobtaining further reductions from sources already regulated orfrom sources that

are scheduled for additional regulationpriorto the attainment year.



### Off-road Mobile

An 

### additional mobile source measure, the Vehicle lIM program has been implemented in the five-parish BatonRouge ozone nonattainment area. On-BoardDiagnostics testing

was implemented in 2002. There is a state statute prohibiting the expansion ofthe lIM programbeyondthe five-parish area [La. R.S. 30:2054.B(8)(a)].

The 11Mprogram achieves emissionreductions very near what stringent 11M240 testing wouldhave achieved at significantlyless cost. Since legislative authority wouldhave to be sought for any lIMprogram expansion, and since the fleet in the Baton Rouge area is small (approximately400,000 subjectto the lIMprogram), LDEQ concludes that the state has applied RACM for the 11Mprogram, in that expansion ofthe 11Mprogram could not be accomplished so as to advance the attainment date for the Baton Rouge nonattainment area. Additionally, for off-road emissions, states are generallypre-empted from setting emissions standards for off-roadmobile sources. 

## Inview oflocal feasibility and the

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010

### 5



### economic impact ofuse restrictions, the LDEQ has determined that further off-road

measures are not RACM.
Major Stationary Sources Analysis



### VOC Major Sources Sensitivityruns completed during the early stages ofthe BatonRouge ozone attainment modeling analysis indicatedthat a NOx control strategywas most effective in reducing ozone in the Baton Rouge area. In addition, the CAA required 24% Rate-of-Progress VOC emissionreductions have been achieved in the BatonRouge nonattainment area. FurtherVOC reductions at this time are deemed to be technologically infeasible as well as not cost effective and would not advance the attainment date for the area. Louisiana has implementedRACT4 

### on all major stationary sources ofVOC in the BatonRouge nonattainment area. The threshold for RACT applicability in the BatonRouge area is 25 tons peryear. The state regulations fulfilling the VOC RACT requirement are shown in Table 1 and Table 2 ofthis document.

NOx Major Sources The BatonRouge NOx control strategy was modeled after the approved strategyfor Beaumont/PortArthur. Althoughminormodifications were made in the BatonRouge plan to tailorit to local conditions, EPA reviewed the proposedNOx control rule and providedno negative comments on theproposed emission factors. In the BatonRouge area the planwill reduce NOx by approximately 77 tons perday, which, along with additional reductions from mobile sources and federal rules has been sufficientto reduce

ozone for the Baton Rouge area to meet theNAAQS in 2008. Moreover, since the emission limits 

### in the proposedrule are deemed to be beyond RACT, which is definedby EPA as the lowest achievable emissionrate considering technical and economic feasibility, the LDEQ considers the Baton Rouge area NOx controlplanRACM formajor

sources.

The NOx control rule establishes requirements forreducing emissions ofNOx during the

ozone seasonin the Baton Rouge 5-parish NonattainmentArea (Ascension, East Baton Rouge, Iberville, Livingston, and West BatonRouge) and from point sources in the Region ofInfluence (the attainmentparishes ofEast Feliciana, Pointe Coupee, St. Helena and West FelicianaParishes). Affected facilities include those with one or more sources that collectively emit or have the potential to emit 25 tons per year or more ofNOx.

The rule establishes emission factors for reducing NOx emissions from boilers, heaters, furnaces, turbines and internal combustion engines. Further, the rule establishes requirements for permits, compliance, recordkeeping and reporting. The rule achieves, at

aminimum, the emissionreductions relied on in the attainment ofthe NAAQS. The state regulation fulfilling the NOx RACT requirement is shown in Table 1 ofthis document.

4 RACT is defined as the lowest emissions limitation that aparticular source is capable ofmeeting by the application ofcontrol technology that is reasonably available considering technological and economic feasibility.

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010

### 6



### The rule proposes the following limits:

• Electric Power Generating SystemBoilers Coal-fired> 40 to 

### < 80 MMBtu!hr Coal-fired

## g 80 MMBtu/hr No.6 fuel oil-fired g 40 to 

### < 80 MMBtu!hr No.6 fuel oil-fired g 80 MMBtu!hr All others (gaseous or liquid) :::: 40 to 

### < 80 MMBtu/hr All others (gaseous or liquid) :::: 80 MMBtu/hr Industrial Boilers g 40 to 

### < 80 MMBtu/hr Industrial Boilers g 80 MMBtu/hr

• Process Heater/Fumaces Ammoniareformers 

### > 40 to 

### < 80MMBtu/hr Ammoniareformers g 80 MMBtu/hr All 

### others>40 to 

### < 80 MMBtu/hr All others 

### > 80 MMBtu/hr

• Stationary Gas Turbines Peaking Service, Fuel Oil-firedg 5 to 

### < 10 MW Peaking Service, Fuel Oil-fired> 10MW Peaking Service, 

### Gas-fired> 5 to 

### < 10 MW Peaking Service, Gas-fired> 10MW All 

### Others> 5 to 

### < 10 MW All Others> 10 MW

• StationaryInternal CombustionEngines Lean-bum 

### engines> 150 to 

### < 320

## Hp : Lean-bum engines 

### > 320 Hp Rich-bum engines> 150 to 

### < 300 Hp Rich-bum engines 

### > 300 Hp 0.50 Ib/MMBtu 0.211b/MMBtu 0.30 Ib/MMBtu 0.18Ib/MMBtu 0.20 Ib/MMBtu 0.10 Ib/MMBtu 0.20 Ib/MMBtu 0.10 Ib/MMBtu

0.30 Ib/MMBtu 0.23 Ib/MMBtu 0.18Ib/MMBtu 0.08 Ib/MMBtu

0.37Ib/MMBtu 0.30 Ib/MMBtu 0.27 Ib/MMBtu 0.20 Ib/MMBtu 0.24Ib/MMBtu 0.16Ib/MMBtu

10 g/Hp-hr 4 g/Hp-hr 2 g/Hp-hr 2g/Hp-hr

The rule required that NOx controls be operational by May 1, 2005.

Area Sources Analysis

VOC Area Sources

The Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 172(c)(1) provides that State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for nonattainment areas must include "reasonably available control measures" (RACM), including "reasonably available control technology" (RACT), for sources of emissions. Section 182(b)(2)(A) provides that for certain nonattainment areas, States must revise their SIPs to include RACT for sources of VOC emissions covered by a control techniques guidelines (CTG) document issued after November 15, 1990 and prior to the area's date ofattainment.

The CAA Section 183(e) directs EPA to list for regulation those categories ofproducts that account for at least 80 percent ofvolatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, on a reactivity-adjusted basis, from consumer and commercial products in areas that violate

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010

### 7

the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone (i.e., ozone nonattainment areas). EPA issued the list on March 23, 1995, and has revised the list periodically. [See 60 FR 15264 (March 23, 1995); see also 71 FR 28320 (May 16,2006), 70 FR 69759 (November 17,2005); 64 FR 13422 (March 18, 1999)].

The CTGs are intended to provide state and local air pollution control authorities information that should assist themin determining RACT for VOCs from multiple source categories. In 

### developing the CTGs, EPA evaluated the sources ofVOC emissions from these categories and the available control approaches for addressing these emissions, including the costs ofsuch approaches. Based on available information and data, EPA provides recommendations for RACT for these categories.

.
The Louisiana Department ofEnvironmental Quality (LDEQ) published an Advanced Notice of Potential Rulemaking (ANPR) on August 20, 2008 for rules covering the following CTGs: flat wood paneling; large appliance coatings; metal furniture coatings; lithographic printing and letterpress printing; paper, film, and foil coatings; flexible package printing; and industrial cleaning solvents. Comments were received for this ANPR and minor changes were made to the rule. The department published a proposed rule for these CTGs on December 20, 2008. Based on comments received for this proposal, technical amendments were made to the rule and the final rule was published in the Louisiana Register on June 20, 2009 (AQ 296 - Appendix A). This rulemaking was initiated due to the changes that EPA made to these CTGs which were published in the Federal Register on October 5, 2007 and October 9,2007.

The Louisiana Department ofEnvironmental Quality (LDEQ) published an Advanced Notice of Potential Rulemaking (ANPR) on August 20, 2009 for rules covering 

### the following CTGs: miscellaneous industrial adhesives, miscellaneous metal and plastic parts coatings, fiberglass boat manufacturing materials, and automobile and light-duty truck coatings. Comments were received for this ANPR and minorchanges were made to the rule. The department published a proposed rule for these CTGs on March 20,2010. Based on comments received for this proposal, technical amendments were made to the rule and the final rule was published in the Louisiana Register on August 20, 2010 (AQ 310

- Appendix A). This rulemaking was initiated due to the changes that EPA made to these CTGs which were published in the Federal Register on October 7, 2008. The state regulations fulfilling the VOC RACT requirements are shown in Table 1 of this document.

Sincethe above categories are alreadycontrolled in the BatonRouge nonattainment area, there are little or no remainingpotentially available emission reductions. Therefore, the amount ofreduction available from additional controls on area sources is minimal and wouldnot advance the attainment date for the BatonRouge area. Also, area sources are mainly a source ofVOCs. The BatonRouge areahas concentratedmore on NOx controls because ozone modeling demonstrated thatNOx controls produce more significant ozonereductions.

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010

### 8

NOx Area Sources NOx area sources are smallerand more numerous than the VOC area sources. Therefore, control ofNOx area sources wouldbe expensive and require an intensive effort. In addition, the EPA stated the following in EPA's final rule on the NOx SIP call:

"Area Sources. In the NPR, EPA noted thatcontrol levels for area sources (i.e.,

sources otherthan mobile or point sources) could not be determinedbased on available information concerning applicable control technologies. Comments to the NPR did not identify specific NOx control technologies that wereboth technologically feasible and highly cost-effective. Because EPA has no new information on applicable control technologies for area sources, no additional control level is assumed for these sources in this rulemaking. (63 FR 57402, October27, 1998.)"

As aresult, controls on these categories are not consideredreasonably available.



### Conclusion
LDEQ has concluded from its modeling analysis that NOx emissionreductions are the most effectivewayto reduce ozone. In the Baton Rouge attainmentmodeling, proposed NOx reductions from major stationary sources, mobile sources and federal rules are shownto be sufficientfor the BatonRouge area to meetthe NAAQS for ozone.
LDEQ does not believe that additional VOC reductions are technologically feasible or cost effective at this time. VOC reductions would not advance the attainmentdate and

arenot as effective in reducing ozonein the Baton Rouge area as demonstrated in the modeling.
Furthermore, as shown in the modeled attainment demonstration, the BatonRouge area relies upon emissions reductions from outside ofthe nonattainment area and from federal rules with implementation dates priorto 2005. Thus, there are no otherreasonably available control measures that could advance the attainment date for the BatonRouge
area.

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010

### 9



### Table 1: State Rules Addressing RACT Requirements in CTG and ACT Reference Documents**==~"..".**



### Aerospace

Agricultural Pesticides

Architectural and Industrial Maintenance Coatin s Automobile Coating

Automobile Coating

Automobile Refinishing

BatchProcesses Guideline Series: Control ofVolatile Organic Compound Emissions from Coating Operations atAerospace Manufacturing and Rework Operations (EPA-4531R-97-004, 

### EPA-68/D1- 00115, EPA-453/D-96-016, December 1997) Control ofVolatile Organic Compound Emissions from the Application of Agricultural Pesticides (EPA-4501R-92- 

### 011, March 1993)

Reduction ofVolatile Organic CompoundEmissions from Application ofTraffic Markings (EPA-450/3-88- 007, August 1988) The Reduction ofVolatile Organic Compound Emissions from Automobile Refinishing (EPA-450/3-88-009, October 1988 Control Techniques Guidelines for Automobile andLight-Dutytruck Assembly Coatings (EPA-4531R-08- 

### 006, September2008) and Protocol for Determining the DailyVolatile Organic CompoundEmissionRate of Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Primer-Surfacer and Topcoat Operations (EPA-4531R-08-002, 

### S tember2008) Alternative Control Techniques Document: Automobile Body Refinishing (EPA-4531R-94-031 , 

### April 1994) Alternative Control Techniques Document: Control ofVolatile Organic Compound Emissions from Batch Processes (EPA4531R-93-017 

### or EPANo existing major sources in the 5-parishBaton Rouge ozone area.

The LDEQ does not regulate the use of agriculturalpesticides and this ACT documentdoes not give presumptive control therefore, no RACT determination is required for this source cate ory. Emissions from this

source category are regulatedby the AIM National Rule. LAC 33:III.2123**,~L**



### LAC 33:III.2123

LAC 33:III.2123

LAC 33:III.2149

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010

### 10

453/R-93-020, February 1994 Bulk Gasoline Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:111.2133 and Plants from Bulk Gasoline Plants (EPA-450/2- LAC 33:111.2135 77-035, December 1977) Cleaning Alternative Control Techniques LAC 33:IIT.2125 and LAC Solvents Document: Industrial Cleaning Solvents 33:111.2151 (EPA-453/R-94-015, February 1994) Cleaning Control Techniques Guidance for LAC 33:111.2123 Solvents Industrial Cleaning Solvents (EPA453/R-06-001, September2006) Commercial Alternative Control Techniques No existing major sources Bakeries Document: Bakery Ovens (EPA-453/R- in the 5-parish Baton 92-017, December 1992) Rouge ozone area CutbackAsphalt Control ofVolatile Organic Compounds LAC 33:111.2127 from Use ofCutbackAsphalt (EPA450/2-77-037, December 1977) Fugitive FugitiveEmission Sources ofOrganic LAC 33:111.2121 and Emissions Compounds - Additional Information LAC 33:111.2122

on Emissions, EmissionReductions, and Costs (EPA-450/3-82-010, April 1982) Gasoline Service Design Criteriafor Stage I Vapor LAC 33:111.2131 Stations Control Systems - Gasoline Service Stations (November 1975) 'Gasoline Service Stations Graphic Arts Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:111.2143 from Existing Stationary Sources, Volume VIII: Graphic Arts - Rotogravure and Flexography (EPA- '450/2-78-033, December 1978) Graphic Arts Control ofVolatile Organic Compound LAC 33:111.2143 Emissions from Offset Lithographic Printing (September 1993) Graphic Arts Alternative Control Technology LAC 33:111.2143 Document: OffsetLithographic Printing (EPA-453/R-94-054, June 1994) Graphic Arts Control Techniques Guidelines for LAC 33:111.2143 OffsetLithographic Printing and Letterpress Printing (EPA-453/R-06- 002, September2006) Graphic Arts Control Techniques Guidelines for LAC 33:111.2143 FlexiblePackage Printing (EPA-453/R06-003, September2006) Industrial Control Techniques forIndustrial LAC 33:111.2153 Wastewater Wastewater (EPA-453/D-93-056, September 1992)

RACT/RACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010

### 11



### Ink and Paint Alternative Control Technology No existingmajor sources Manufacturing Document: Control ofVolatile Organic in the 5-parish Baton Compounds from 

### Ink and Paint Rouge ozone area. Manufacturing (EPA-453/3-92-013 LeatherTanning Alternative Control Technology No existing major sources and Finishing Document: LeatherTanning and in the 5-parish Baton Operations Finishing Operations (EPA-453/3-93- Rouge ozone area. 025) Metal Furniture Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:II1.2123 from Existing Stationary Sources, Volume III: Surface Coating ofMetal Furniture (EPA-450/2-77-032, December 1977) Natural Control ofVolatile Organic Compound LAC 33:111.2104 Gas/Gasoline EquipmentLeaks from Natural Processing Gas/Gasoline Processing Plants (EPA450/3-83-007, September 1982) PetroleumDry Control ofVolatile Organic Compound No existing major sources Cleaners Emissions from Large PetroleumDry in the 5-parish Baton Cleaners (EPA-450/3-82-009) Rouge ozone area. PetroleumLiquid Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:111.2103 Storage from Storage ofPetroleum Liquids in FixedRoofTanks (EPA-450/2-77-036) Petroleum Liquid Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:II1.2103 Storage in External Floating RoofTanks (EPA450/2-78-047, December 1978) -.--. ',' 

### Petroleum Liquid Alternative Control Techniques LAC 33:III.2103 Storage Document: Volatile Organic Liquid Storage in floating and Fixed Roof Tanks (EPA-453/R-94-001, January 1994) Plywood Veneer Control Techniques for Organic No existingmajor sources Dryers Emissions from Plywood VeneerDryers in the 5-parish Baton (EPA-450/3-83-012, May 1983) Rouge ozone area. Process Vents Alternative Control Technology LAC 33:111.2115 Document: Organic Waste Process Vents (EPA-450/3-91-007, December 1990) Refineries Control ofRefineryVacuum Producing LAC 33:111.2139 and Systems, WastewaterSeparators, and LAC 33:111.2141 Process Unit Turnarounds (EPA-450/2- 77-025, October 1977) Refineries Control ofVolatile Organic Compound LAC 33:111.2121 and Leaks from Petroleum Refinery LAC 33:111.2122 Equipment (EPA-450/2-78-036, June 1978)

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010

### 12

RubberTires Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions No existing major sources from Manufacture ofPneumatic Rubber in the 5-parishBaton Tires (EPA-450/2-78-030, December Rouge ozone area. 1978) Shipbuilding and Control Technique Guidance for LAC 33:III.2123 Ship Repair Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Operations (EPA-453/R-94-032, April 1994) Shipbuilding and Control Techniques Guidelines for LAC 33:III.2123 Ship Repair Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Surface Coating Operations (61 FR 44050, August27, 1996) Solvent Cleaning Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:III.2125 from SolventMetal Cleaning (EPA450/2-77-022, November 1977) Surface Coating Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:III.2123 from Existing Stationary Sources, Volume I: Control Methods for Surface Coating Operation (EPA-450/2-76-028, November 1976 Surface Coating Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:ill.2123 from Existing Stationary Sources, Volume II: Surface Coating ofCans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light-DutyTrucks (EPA-450/2-77-008, May 1977) Surface Coating Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:III.2123 from Existing Stationary Sources, Volume IV: Surface Coating for Insulation ofMagnet Wire (EPA-450/2- 77-033, December 1977) Surface Coating Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:III.2123 from Existing Stationary Sources, Volume V: Surface Coating ofLarge Appliances (EPA-450/2-77-034, December 1977) Surface Coating Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:III.2123 from Existing Stationary Sources, Volume VI: Surface Coating of MiscellaneousMetal Parts and Products (EPA-450/2-78-015, June 1978) Surface Coating Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:III.2123 from Existing Stationary Sources, Volume VII: Factory Surface Coating of Flat Wood Paneling (EPA-450/2-78- 032, June 1978)

RACT/RACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010

### 13

Surface Coating Alternative Control Techniques LAC 33:II1.2123 Document: Surface Coating of Automotive/Transportation and Business MachinePlastic Parts (EPA453/R-94-017, February 1994) Surface Coating ControlTechniques Guidelines for Flat LAC 33:II1.2123 WoodPaneling Coatings (EPA-453/R06-004, September2006) Surface Coating Control Techniques Guidelines for LAC 33:111.2123 Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings (EPA453/R-07-003, September2007) Surface Coating Control Techniques Guidelines for LAC 33:111.2123 Large Appliance Coatings (EPA-453/R07-004, September2007) Surface Coating Control Techniques Guidelines for LAC 33:111.2123 Metal Furniture Coatings (EPA-453/R07-005, September2007) Surface Coating Control Techniques Guidelines for LAC 33:111.2123 Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings (EPA-453/R-08-003,

., , 

### September2008) Surface Coating Control Techniques Guidelines for LAC 33:111.2123 Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials (EPA-453/R-08-004, September2008) Surface Coating Control Techniques Guidelines for LAC 33:111.2123 Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives .

__._. 

### (EPA-453/R-08-005, September2008) Synthetic Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:111.2145 Organic from Manufacture ofSynthesized Chemical PharmaceuticalProducts (EPA-450/2- Manufacturing 78-029, December 1978) Industry Synthetic Control ofVolatile Organic Compound LAC 33:111.2147 Organic Emissions form Manufacture ofHighChemical DensityPolyethylene, Polypropylene, Manufacturing and PolystyreneResins (EPA450/3-83- Industry 008, November 1983) Synthetic Control ofVolatile Organic Compound LAC 33:111.2121 and Organic Fugitive Emissions from Synthetic LAC 33:111.2122 Chemical Organic Chemical Polymer and Resin Manufacturing Manufacturing Equipment (EPA-450/3- Industry 83-006, March 1984) Synthetic Control ofVolatile Organic Compound LAC 33:111.2147 Organic Emissions from Air Oxidation Processes Chemical in Synthetic Organic Chemical

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010

### 14

LAC 33:111.2137

No existingmajor sources in the 5-parishBaton Rou e ozone area. No existingmajorsources in the 5-parish Baton Rouge ozone area. LAC 33:111.2147 LAC 33:111.2147

No existingmajorsources 

### in the 5-parishBaton Rouge ozone area. LAC 33:111.2137

Guideline Series: Control ofVolatile Organic CompoundEmissions from Wood Furniture Manufacturing erations (EPA-453/D-95-002 Guidelines Series: Control ofVolatile Organic CompoundEmissions from Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations (EPA-453/R-96-007, April 1996 Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture ofVegetable Oils (EPA-450/2-78-035, June 1978 Control ofVolatile Organic Compound Leaks from Gasoline Tank Trucks and Vapor Collection Systems (EPA-450/2- 78-051, December 1978) Polystyrene Foam Manufacturing (EPA450/3-90-020, 1990)

Control ofHydrocarbons from Tank Truck Gasoline Loading Terminals (EPA-450/2-77-026, December 1977 Control ofVolatile Organic Compound Emissions From Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations in Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (EPA-450/4-91-031, August 1993) Manufacturing Industry (EPA-450/3-84- 015, December 1984)

Vegetable Oil Manufacturing Tank Trucks

Electric PowerGeneratin SystemBoilers: Wood Furniture Manufacturing

Wood Furniture Manufacturing Manufacturing Indus Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry

Tank Trucks Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry

Coal-fired Controlling Nitrogen Oxides Underthe LAC 33:111.2201 Clean Air Act: A Menu ofOptions (STAPPAIALAPCO, Jul 1994) Number 6 Fuel ControllingNitrogen Oxides Underthe LAC 33:111.2201 Oil-fired Clean Air Act: A Menu ofOptions (STAPPAIALAPCO, Jul 1994) All Otheres Controlling Nitrogen Oxides Underthe LAC 33:111.2201 (gaseous or Clean Air Act: A Menu ofOptions Ii uid (STAPPAIALAPCO, Jul 1994 Industrial Boilers Controlling Nitrogen Oxides Underthe LAC 33:111.2201 Clean Air Act: A Menu ofOptions (STAPPAIALAPCO, July 1994)

RACT/RACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010

### 15

Process HeaterlFurnaces: Ammonia ControllingNitrogen Oxides Underthe LAC 33:111.2201 Reformers Clean Air Act: A Menu ofOptions (STAPPAIALAPCO, July 1994) All Others ControllingNitrogen Oxides Underthe LAC 33:111.2201 Clean Air Act: A Menu ofOptions (STAPPAIALAPCO, July 1994) Stationary Gas Turbines: Peaking Service, ControllingNitrogen Oxides Underthe LAC 33:111.2201 Fuel Oil-fired Clean Air Act: A Menu ofOptions (STAPPAIALAPCO, July 1994) Peaking Service, ControllingNitrogen Oxides Underthe LAC 33:111.2201 Gas-fired Clean Air Act: A Menu ofOptions (STAPPAIALAPCO, July 1994) All Others ControllingNitrogen Oxides Underthe LAC 33:111.2201 Clean Air Act: A Menu ofOptions (STAPPAIALAPCO, July 1994) StationaryInternal CombustionEngines: Lean-burn ControllingNitrogen Oxides Underthe LAC 33:111.2201 Clean Air Act: A Menu ofOptions

... 1."" 

### (STAPPAIALAPCO, July 1994) Rich-burn ControllingNitrogen Oxides Underthe LAC 33:ID.2201 Clean Air Act: A Menu ofOptions (STAPPAIALAPCO, July 1994)

Table 2: VOC Emissions - Rules in Addition to RACT

VOC Loadin Marine Vapor Recovery OiVWater Se aration Pumps and Com ressors Glycol Dehydrators 61FR38591

59FR23166

Has notbeenpublished in Federal Register LAC 33:111.2107 LAC 33:111.2108

LAC 33:111.2109

LAC 33:111.2111

LAC 33:111.2116

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010AQ,mcy!**1%fuj,a,,~;fIi<im~** '. ,."""',' ". ',,' .". ",,': .','.**"PARIS~;** . NOX.tPY,:

.. ::,-0''2 l.:AC:33;1II.22Q1 other ,,", '" '>

.. , ....;

... ,,;,. " 248 Oeltech Corp - Baton Rouge Facility East Baton Rou e 280.73 X 285 ExxonMobil Chemical Co - Baton Rouge Plastics Plant East Baton Rou e 457.42 X 286 ExxonMobii Corp - Baton Rouge Chemical Plant East Baton Rou e 4938.51 X 288 Formosa Plastics Corp Louisiana East Baton Rou e 1127.94 X 289 Honevwellintemational Inc - Baton Rouge South Works East Baton Rou e 7506 X 1093 LC Geismar Services LLC - Geismar Facilitv Ascension 1008.48 X 1136 Shell Chemical Co - Geismar Plant Ascension 1221.59 X 1138 Westlake Vinyls Co LP Ascension 290.44 X 1186 Entergy Gulf States LA LLC - Louisiana Station Electrical Generating Plant East Baton Rouge 4008.9 X 1306 Cora Texas Manufacturing Co Iberville 550.16 does not operate during ozone season 1314 Rhodia Inc East Baton Rouge 211.97 40 CFR 60 Subpart Db, further controls are not economicallyfeasible 1395 Lion Copolymer LLC

- Baton Rouge Plant East Baton Rouge 564.19 X 1409 The Dow Chemical Co - Louisiana Operations Iberville 8894.86 X 1413 UOP LLC - Baton Rouge Plant East Baton Rouqe 47.28 NOx controls are not economicallv feasible 1468 Rubicon LLC c Geismar Plant Ascension 376.51 NOx controls are not economicallvfeasible 1607 TOTAL Petrochemicals USA Inc - Cos-Mar Co Iberville 1348.71 X 2049 BASF Corp - Geismar Sile Ascension 1999.01 X 2082 Honevwellintemational Inc 'Geismar Complex Ascension 172.98 X 2218 PraxairInc - Geismar HYCO Facility Ascension 623.38 X 2245 Terra Mississippi Nitrogen Inc -Donaldsonviae Facility Ascension 1311.94 X 2366 Placid Refining Co LLC

- Port Allen Refinerv West Baton Rouge 662.59 X 2367 svncenta Crop Protection Inc - St Gabriel Plant lberville 636.98 X 2416 CF Industries Inc - Donaldsonville NitroQen Complex Ascension 3879.97 X 2455 Georoia Gulf Chemicals & Vinvls LLC

- Plaquemine Division Iberville 3195.89 X 2617 GeorQia-Pacific Consumer Operations LLC - Port Hudson Operations East Baton Rouoe 6612.45 NOx" 0.10 Ib/MMBtu, complies through BACT 2625 Entergy Gulf States LA LLC - Willow Glen Plant Ibeeville 23758 X 2638 ExxonMobil Baton Rouge Refinery East Baton Rouce 5323.7 X 2644 PioneerAmericas LLC .;5t Gabriel Facility lbeeville 58.94 X 2679 AirProducts & Chemicals Inc - Syngas Plant #1 Ascension 77.96 X 3263 Taminco Higher Amines Inc Iberville 115.84 X 3302 Crosstex Processing Services LLC -Riverside Fractionation Ascension 138.93 X 3387 NoYolvteTechnoloqies Inc East Baton Rouge 39.27 40 CFR 60 Subpart Dc, further controls are not economicallyfeasible 3400 OxvChem - Geismar Plant Ascension 314.2 X 3420 Ormet Primarv Aluminum Corp

- Bumside Alumina Plant Ascension 931.61 NOx controls are not economicallyfeasible 3519 ExxonMobil Chemical Co - Baton Rouce Polvolefins Plant East Baton Rouqe 289.76 X 3732 PCS Nilrogen Fertilizer LP - Geismar-Agricuijural Nitrogen & Phosphate Plant Ascension 2903.43 X 4174 Sid Richardson Carbon & Energv Co West Baton Rouge 386.17 NOx controls are not economically feasible 4197 Southem Natural Gas Co

- While Castle Compressor Station Iberville 519.73 X 4762 Enterprise Gas Processing LLC - Tebone Fractionation Plant Ascension 71.02 X 4803 BFt - Colonial Landfill Ascension 39.14 NOx controls are not economically feasible 5176 TOTAL Petrochemicals USA Inc - Carville Polvstyrene Plant Iberville 89.45 X 5540 Louisiana State Universitv - LSU East Baton Rouqe 430.69 X 5565 Williams Olefins LLC - Geismar EthYlene Plant Ascension 1581.36 X 7359 White Castle Compressor Station lbeeville 465.8 X 8007 Florida Gas Transmission Co - Zachary Compressor Station #8 East Baton Rouge 512.39 X 8055 State of Louisiana Militarv - Gillis W LoOQ Center Iberville 64.42 40 CFR 60 Subpart Db, further controls are not economically feasible 8056 Plaquemine Point Shipyard Ibeeville 25.48 NOx controls are not economicallvfeasible 9495 BASF Com - Port Allen Works West Baton Rouoe 73.03 NOx controls are not economicallvfeasible 11416 Chevron Pice Line Co - Sorrento Underground Gas Storage Facilitv Ascension 148.84 X 11767 Waste Management of Louisiana LLC -Woodside Sanilarv Landfill & Recycling Center Livingston 65.32 NOx controls are not economically feasible 17161 ExxonMobil Production Corp - Baton Rouge Gas Plant West Baton Rouge 227.13 X 17383 Crosstex L1GLLC

- Mvrtle Grove Station lbeeville 83.13 X 19184 Crosstex UG liQuids LLC - Plaquemine Gas Plant lberville 150.08 X 19338 Petroleum Fuel & Terminal Co - Port Allen Terminal West Baton Rouqe 25.63 NOx controls are not economicallv feasible 19875 Weyerhaeuser NR Co - Holden Wood Products LivinQston 50.34 NOx controls are not economicallvfeasible 25344 Criterion Catalysts & Technotoqies LP- Port Allen Plant West Baton Rouge 49.48 40 CFR 60 Subpart Dc, further controls are not economicallY feasible 26034 Louisiana Energy & PowerAuthomv LEPA

- Plaouemine Steam Electric Power Plant Ibeeville 492.66 40 CFR 60 Subpart D, further controls are not economicallyfeasible 29884 Oxbow Calcining LLC - Baton Rouoe Calcined Coke Plant East Baton Rouge 1234.8 NOx controls are not economically feasible 31128 East Baton Rouge Parish North Landfill East Baton Rouge 29.73 NOx controls are not economicallyfeasibleAgen!;¥'**QompanY~~rn"** c <**>;~** :i . 

# '

..**~.,;,;.,~.** 

# :

..,

;':

. <**F'A~SH, ~i:**  NOXTPY 

### '.**L;l\;C:~3.11I,2201** . Other "C" .'

.... , 31513 Air Liquide Laroe Industries US LP - Geismar Ascension 387.28 40 CFR 60 Subpart Db and Dc, further controls are not economically feasible 32133 Bayou Sorrel Comrninolino Facilrty Iberville 42.46 X 32135 WhrteCastle Field Production Facilrtv lberville 37,88 X 32141 Chevron Pipe Line Co - Tallv Ho Compressor Station Iberville 26.76 X 32145 Northwest Bayou Choctaw Production Facility Iberville 25.34 X 32146 Bayou Choctaw Field Production Facilrtv Iberville 32.29 NOx controls are not economically feasible 32161 Bayou Henry Field Production Facilitv lberville 28.9 NOx controls are not economicall feasible 33564 Cooper T Smith Stevedoring Co - America Weioh Ria Loadino &Transfer Facilitv Ascension 89,71 NOx controls are not economicall feasible 33687 Cooper T Smrth Stevedoring Co - Terrence Derrick Ascension 60.87 NOx controls are not economicall feasible 33689 Ports America Louisiana LLC - Derrick Barge Mickey Ascension 36.64 NOx controls are not econornicall feasible 39945 Ormet Corp - Burnside Bulk Marine Terminal - Division of Orrnet Primary Aluminum Corp Ascension 78.1 NOx controls are not economicall feasible 40198 Enterprise Products Operating LLC - Baton Rouge Act FraclPCU West Baton Rouoe 115.9 40 CFR 60 Suboart GG and Db, further controls are not economicallv feasible 43634 TrinrtvMarine Products Inc - Plant #48 West Baton Rouge 33.51 NOx controls are not economicallY feasible 46968 Mid-America Resources Corp - Sorrento Field Production Facilrtv Ascension 54.03 X 51854 Carville EnereY LLC

- Carville Enemy Center lberville 1533,04 40 CFR 60 Subpart GG and Da, further controls are not economically feasible 67572 E I Duoont de Nemours &Co Inc - Burnside Plant A H2S04 Contact Facilrtv Ascension 77.19 40 CFR 60 Subpart De, further controls are not economically feasible 83425 Shintech Louisiana LLC

- Addis Plant A West Baton Rouge 67,5 X 83718 LDH Enemy Refinery Services LLC - Geismar Fractionation Plant Ascension 65,36 40 CFR 60 Subpart GG and De, further controls are not economically feasible 85652 Dow Chemical Co (The ) - Plaquemine Coaeneration Plant Iberville 854.4 40 CFR 60 Subpart GG and Da, further controls are not economically feasible 85899 Industrial Coatines Contractors 1nc Ascension 30.8 40 CFR 60 Subpart /III, further controls are not economically feasible 88139 Port Hudson Central Tank Battery East Baton Rouge 45.72 X 121482 Associated Terminals of Baton Rouoe LLC West Baton Rouqe 33.06 NOx controls are not economically feasible 126578 Shintech Louisiana LLC - Plaouemine PVC Plant lberville 231 X 152442 Wilbert #4 Tank Battery - White Castle Field Iberville 26,3 NOx controls are not economically feasible 154867 Air Products &Chemicals Inc - Baton Rouoe Hvdroqen Plant- Steam Methane Reformino Facility East Baton Rouee 44.1 X 156077 A Wilbert's Sons LLC 88 #2 Production Facilitv West Baton Rouae 34.01 40 CFR 60 Subpart JJJJ,further controls are not economically feasible 166443 Flopam Inc

- Flopam Facilrty Iberville 236.25 40 CFR 60 Suboart De, further controls are not economically feasible**~~ric;y; CoinpanyN!lin~**  PARISH VOC LAC:33.11121 Other**Jn~lirest** T!'Y 2103 2104 2101 2108z 2109 2111 2113 2115 2116 2121 2122 2123 2125 2121 2129 2131 2132' 2133 2135 2131 2139 2141 2143 2141 2149 2151 2153

-.-,,- East Baton 248 Deltech Corp - Baton Rouge Facility Rouge 90.628 X X X X

ExxonMobil Chemical Co - Baton Rouge East Baton 285 Plastics Plant Rouge 751.88 X X X X X

ExxonMobil Corp - Baton Rouge East Baton 286 Chemical Plant Rouge 4128.8 X X X X X X X X X X X

East Baton 288 Formosa Plastics Corp Louisiana Rouge 358.59 X X X X X X X
Honeyweil International Inc - Baton East Baton 289 Rouge South Works Rouge 336.07 X X X X X West Baton 302 TT Barge Services Mile 237 Rouge 48.27 X X

ExxonMobil Corp - Baton Rouge East Baton 332 Terminal #5005 Rouge 91.2 X X X X X X X
Plantation Pipe Line Co - Baton Rouge East Baton 582 BreakoutTank Farm Rouge 3572 X X X X

Albemarle Corp - Process Developmeni East Baton 669 Center Rouge 92.68 X X West ExxonMobil Refining & Supply Co - - Baton 858 Anchorage Tank Farm • Rouge 128.71 X X X X 1093 Facility Ascension 27.83 X X 1136 Shell Chemical Co - Geismar Plant Ascension 1088 X X X X X X X X X X 1138 Westlake Vinyls Co LP Ascension 249.7 X X X X X X
Entergy Gulf States LA LLC - Louisiana East Baton 1186 Station Electrical Generating Plant Rouge 84.94 X X X does not operate 1306 Cora Texas Manufacturing Co Iberviile 33.78 X X during ozone season

East Baton 1314 Rhodia Inc Rouge 77.31 X X X X X X X X

East Baton 1395 Lion Copolymer LLC - Baton Rouge Plant Rouge 534.89 X X X X X X 1409 Operations lberville 3157.7 X X X X X X X X X X X X 1433 Facility Ascension 1652.3 X X X X X X X X 1468 Rubicon LLC - Geismar Plant Ascension 303.22 X X X X X X X X 1607 MarCo Iberville 383.93 X X X West BP Lubricants USA Inc - Port Allen Baton 1648 Facility Rouge 38.73 X X X 2049 BASF Corp - Geismar Site Ascension 319.26 X X X X X X X 2082 Complex Ascension 69.68 X X X 2218 Praxair Inc - Geismar HYCO Facility Ascension 93.66 X X X X 2245 Donaldsonville Facility Ascension 102.69 X XAgenl:Y' voc ".' LAC:33.111.21 CQmpany NaQle PARISH Other Int!irA!.st .",' TPY 2103 2104 2107 2108 2109 2111 2113 2115 2116 .2121 2122 2123 2125 2127 2129 2131 2132 2133 2135 2137 2139 2141 2143 2147 2149 2151 2153 West Placid Refining Co LLC . Port Allen Baton 2366 Refinery Rouge 377.75 X X X X X X X X X X 2367 Plant Iberville 460.98 X X X X X 2416 Nitrogen Complex Ascension 261.24 X X X X Georgia Gulf Chemicals & Vinyls LLC • 2455 Plaquemine Division Iberville 588.17 X X X X X X
Georqia-Pacific Consumer Operations East Baton 2617 LLC • Port Hudson Operations Rouge 1570.1 X X 2625 Glen Plant lberville 600.45 X X

East Baton 2638 ExxonMobil Baton Rouge Refinery Rouge 6786.1 X X X X X X X X X X X X 3263 Taminco Higher Amines Inc Iberville 123.71 X X X X X X Crosstex Processing Services LLC . 3302 Riverside Fractionation Ascension 60.96 X X X X X X

East Baton 3387 Novolyte Technologies Inc Rouge 27.36 X X X X 3400 OxyChem

. Geismar Plant Ascension 149.72 X X X X X X 3492 Terminal Iberville 582.11 X X X X X X

ExxonMobil Chemical Co • Baton Rouge East Balon 3519 Polyolefins Plant Rouge 253.61 X X X X X PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer LP • Geismar not economically 3732 Agricultural Nitrogen & Phosphate Plant Ascension 78.1 X feasible Kb. further VOC Genesis Crude Oil LP • Truck Loading East Baton controlsare not 3991 Facility Rouge 40.01 X economically West Baton 4174 Sid Richardson Carbon & Energy Co Rouge 100.86 X X Southern Natural Gas Co - While Castle 4197 Compressor Station lberville 87.79 X X X Enterprise Gas Processing LLC - Tebone 4762 Fractionation Plant Ascension 112.2 X X X X X 4803 BF!

- Colonial Landfill Ascension 26.69 X X TOTAL Petrochemicals USA Inc5176 Carville Polystyrene Plant Iberville 44.73 X X X X X 5565 Plant Ascension 314.32 X X X X 7359 White Castle Compressor Station Iberville 45.53 X X

Florida Gas Transmission Co - zachary East Baton 8007 Compressor Station #8 Rouge 100.41 X X X 8056 Plaquemine Point Shipyard Iberville 39.69 X X X X 8072 Bayou Bouillon Facility Iberville 118.75 X X X X X X X .' 9154 Shaw Sunland Fabricators Inc Livingston 75.11 X X X West VOC controls are Baton not economically 9495 BASF Corp - Port Allen Works Rouge 149.01 X feasible West Specialty Application Services Inc - Port Baton 11059 Allen Facilily Rouge 80.63 X X X Chevron Pipe Line Co - Sorrento 11416 Underground Gas Storage Facility Ascension 60.18 X X X X

.... L.**A:g~'lcy** '"**C!>IIlP_a~¥f,l;lme** . . PARISH VOC LAC:33.1II.21**i.liie~j** 

### .... < • TPV 21,03 2104 2107 2iUB 2109 2111 2113 2115 211. 2121 2122 2123

. 2125 2127 2129 21:n .2132 2133 2135 2137 2139 2141 2143 2147 2149 2151 2153 other

Flowers Baking Co of Baton Rouge LLC . East Baton 11595 Baton Rouge Facility Rouge 237.33 X X Woodside Sanitary Landfill & Recycling 11767 Center Livingston 34.27 X X West ExxonMobil Production Corp - Baton Baton 17161 Rouge Gas Plant Rouge 32.02 X X X X X X X 17383 Crosstex LtG LLC

- Myrtie Grove Station Iberville 39.24 X X X 17771 T T Barge Cleaning Mile 183 Inc Ascension 31.5 X X X 19184 Gas Plant lberville 54.08 X X X X X West VOC controls are Petroleum Fuel & Terminal Co

- Port Baton not economically 19338 Allen Terminal Rouge 25.01 X feasible 19875 Products Livingston 395.13 X X WWWW. further VOC controls are EDO Specialty Plastics

- Perkins Road East Baton not economically 22750 Facility Rouge 60.33 X feasible

East Baton 25383 Lamar Graphics Rouge 26.66 X X West Baton 26217 Tumer Industries Group LLC Rouge 96 X X 26272 Terminal Ascension 32.79 X X X

East Baton 27559 Bayou Coaling LLC Rouge 70.32 X X 27834 Storage Facility Ascension 30.34 X X

Oxbow Calcining LLC

- Baton Rouge East Baton 29884 Calcined Coke Plant Rouge 25.37 X X AAAA, furthervac controls are not East Baton economically 31128 East Baton Rouge Parish North Landfill Rouge 28.1 X feasible Air Liquide Large Industries US LP

- not economically 31513 Geismar Ascension 35.9 X feasible 32133 Bayou. Sorrel Commingling Facility Iberville 32.55 X X X X 32135 White CasUe Field Production Facility Iberville 45.81 X X X 32145 Facility Iberville 42.78 X X X 32160 Bayou Bleu Field Production Facility lberville 118.75 X X X X X X X 32465 LVG WXl RA SU LB Facility Livingston 118.75 X X X X X X X 32466 Erva S Mayers # 1 Livingston 36.27 X X 33667 Paint Yard lberville 39.28 X X X :3!l633 Command Services Inc Iberville 66.42 X X 39976 GabrielLLC lberville 99.25 X X X X X 40037 State Lease 14371 Production Facility lberville 142.5 X X X X X X X West Enterprise Products Operating LLC

- Baton 40198 Baton Rouge Act FraclPCU Rouge 73.12 X X X X Enterprise Products Operating Co LLp· 41417 Dome Storage Facility Ascension 167.79 X X XAgency**.~tl!1ij:l""yName** 'PARISH voe LAC:33.1II.21**In't~reiit** TPY 2103 2104 2101 2108 2109 2111 2113 2115 2116 .2121 2122 2123 2125 2127 2129 2131**21~2** .2133 2135 2131 2139 2141 '2143 2141 2149 2151 2153 Other
West Baton 43634 Trinity Marine Products Inc

- Plant #48 Rouge 219.67 X X X 51854 Center IberviUe 152.92 X X 80537 Environmental Products Livingston 84.19 X X West Baton 83425 Shintech Louisiana LLC

- Addis Plant A Rouge 71.57 X X X LDH Energy Refinery Services LLC

- 83718 Geismar Fractionation Plant Ascension 60.48 X X X X 85393 Bayou Henry Central Facility Iberville 142.5 X X X X X X X Dow Chemical Co (The)

- Plaquemine not economically 85652 Cogeneration Plant IberviUe 48.16 X feasible

East Baton 88139 Port Hudson Central Tank Battery Rouge 35.36 X X X 89237 Americas LLC Iberville 69.02 X X X X X X X 89512 Facility Iberville 118.75 X X X X X X X Hexion Specialty Chemicals Inc

- 92534 Formaldehyde Plants 4&5 Ascension 145.11 X X X X X

East Baton 95859 University Field Production FaciHty Rouge 142.5 X X X X X X X 99129 United Lands #1 Facility Ascension 142.5 X X X X X X X 11331 Destec Ventures Facility lberville 47.5 X X X X X X X 115181 Weyerhaeuser #2 Production Facility Livingston 118.75 X X X X X X X

East Baton 119007 Duplantier Tank Battery

- University Field "Rouge 142.5 X X X X X X X

East Baton 119008 Nelson Tank Battery

- University Field Rouge 142.5 X X X X X X X 123784 Wilbert E-1 Wellsite Iberville 118.75 X X X X X X X 123785 Wilbert B-3 Well Site Iberville 118.75 X X X X X X X
Pennington #1 Tank Battery

- SN 229775 East Baton 125816 Port Hudson Field Rouge 51.05 X X X X 126578 PVC Plant lberville 123.57 X X X X X X X 126748 Lake Field lberville 142.5 X X X X X X X 126750 Frog Lake Field lberville 118.75 X X X X X X X VOC controls are North Burtville Field Facility

- North East Baton not economically 138716 Burtville Field Rouge 27.11 X 

## , feasible 138856 St Gabriel Dehydration & NGL Facility #1. Iberville 48.37 X X X

Crown Paper #1 Production Facility- East Baton 144826 Profit Island Field Rouge 34.88 X X X 147113 Logistics Center Ascension 45.17 X X X X

East Baton 152236 Hoffman Heirs #1 - Sardine Point Field Rouge 32.65 X X X Air Products & Chemicals Inc - Baton Rouge Hydrogen Plant- Steam Methane East Baton 154867 Reforming Facility Rouge 28.08 X X X A Wilberts Son et al #1 Production 156867 Facility - White CasUe Field lberville 38.24 X XOther