Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 241 / Monday, December 16, 2013 / Notices 76183 

3The GC, subject to the approval of the Board, is 

permitted to hire specialists or rely on outside 

advisors or specialists to assist it in carrying out the 

GC’s activities. The GC has the authority to approve 

the fees and retention terms of such advisors and 

specialists. 

4 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F). 

5 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(d)(8). 

6 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(I). 7 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

programs for Board members and 

recommend changes, where appropriate. 

In addition to the foregoing, the GC may 

undertake other and different activities, 

as appropriate, or as may be delegated 

to it by the Board. In discharging its 

role, the GC shall confer with 

management and other employees of 

OCC to the extent the GC deems it 

necessary to so to fulfill its duties.3

OCC believes that the proposed rule 

change is consistent with Section 

17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 4 because the GC 

Charter helps ensure that OCC’s 

governance structure is designed to 

protect investors and the public interest. 

By creating a GC Charter that clarifies 

the duties and operations of the GC, 

OCC will have, as required under Rule 

17Ad–22(d)(8), a clear and transparent 

governance structure that will fulfill the 

public interests requirements in Section 

17A of the Act, support the objectives of 

OCC’s owners and participants and 

promote the effectiveness of OCC’s risk 

management procedures.5

(B) Clearing Agency’s Statement on 

Burden on Competition 

OCC does not believe that the 

proposed rule change would impose any 

burden on competition that is not 

necessary or appropriate in furtherance 

of the purposes of the Act.6 This 

proposed rule change will help ensure 

that OCC meets regulatory requirements 

that it has a clear and transparent 

governance structure, as well as clarify 

the organization, duties and operation of 

the GC through the adoption of the GC 

Charter. To the extent OCC’s clearing 

members are affected by proposed rule 

change, OCC believes that, by 

publishing the terms of the GC Charter 

in the public domain, all of its 

participants will have greater certainty 

concerning OCC’s governance 

arrangements. Accordingly, OCC does 

not believe that the proposed rule will 

it impose any burden on competition 

that is not necessary or appropriate in 

furtherance of the purposes of the Act. 

(C) Clearing Agency’s Statement on 

Comments on the Proposed Rule 

Change Received From Members, 

Participants or Others 

Written comments on the proposed 

rule change were not and are not 

intended to be solicited with respect to 

the proposed rule change and none have 

been received. 

III. Date of Effectiveness of the 

Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 

Commission Action 

Within 45 days of the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register or within such longer period 

up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may 

designate if it finds such longer period 

to be appropriate and publishes its 

reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which 

the self-regulatory organization 

consents, the Commission will: 

(A) By order approve or disapprove 

the proposed rule change, or 

(B) institute proceedings to determine 

whether the proposed rule change 

should be disapproved. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s Internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/

rules/sro.shtml), or 

• Send an email to rule-comments@

sec.gov. Please include File Number 

SR–OCC–2013–18 on the subject line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, 

Securities and Exchange Commission, 

100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 

20549–1090. 

All submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–OCC–2013–18. This file 

number should be included on the 

subject line if email is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method of submission. The 

Commission will post all comments on 

the Commission’s Internet Web site 

(http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 

Copies of the submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C 552, will be 

available for Web site viewing and 

printing in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room located at 100 F Street 

NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090 on 

official business days between the hours 

of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of 

such filing also will be available for 

inspection and copying at the principal 

office of OCC and on OCC’s Web site at 

http://www.theocc.com/about/

publications/bylaws.jsp. All comments 

received will be posted without change; 

the Commission does not edit personal 

identifying information from 

submissions. You should submit only 

information that you wish to make 

available publicly. 

All submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–OCC–2013–18 and should 

be submitted on or before January 6, 

2014. 

For the Commission by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.7

Kevin M. O’Neill, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2013–29780 Filed 12–13–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

[Public Notice 8548] 

Request for Information for the 2014; 

Trafficking in Persons Report 

SUMMARY: The Department of State (‘‘the 

Department’’) requests written 

information to assist in reporting on the 

degree to which the United States and 

foreign governments comply with the 

minimum standards for the elimination 

of trafficking in persons (‘‘minimum 

standards’’) that are prescribed by the 

Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 

2000, (Div. A, Pub. L. 106–386) as 

amended (‘‘TVPA’’). This information 

will assist in the preparation of the 

Trafficking in Persons Report (‘‘TIP 

Report’’) that the Department submits 

annually to appropriate committees in 

the U.S. Congress on governments’ level 

of compliance with the minimum 

standards. Foreign governments that do 

not comply with the minimum 

standards and are not making significant 

efforts to do so may be subject to 

restrictions on nonhumanitarian, 

nontrade-related foreign assistance from 

the United States, as defined by the 

TVPA. Submissions must be made in 

writing to the Office to Monitor and 

Combat Trafficking in Persons at the 

Department of State by January 30, 

2014. Please refer to the Addresses, 

Scope of Interest, and Information 

Sought sections of this Notice for 

additional instructions on submission 

requirements. 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
76184 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 241 / Monday, December 16, 2013 / Notices 

DATES: Submissions must be received by 

the Office to Monitor and Combat 

Trafficking in Persons by 5 p.m. on 

January 30, 2014. 

Addresses: Written submissions and 

supporting documentation may be 

submitted to the Office to Monitor and 

Combat Trafficking in Persons by the 

following methods: 

• Facsimile (fax): 202–312–9637. 

• Mail, Express Delivery, Hand 

Delivery and Messenger Service: U.S. 

Department of State, Office to Monitor 

and Combat Trafficking in Persons 

(J/TIP), 1800 G Street NW., Suite 2148, 

Washington, DC 20520. Please note that 

materials submitted by mail may be 

delayed due to security screenings and 

processing. 

• Email (preferred): tipreport@

state.gov for submissions related to 

foreign governments and tipreportUS@

state.gov for submissions related to the 

United States. 

Scope of Interest: The Department 

requests information relevant to 

assessing the United States’ and foreign 

governments’ compliance with the 

minimum standards for the elimination 

of trafficking in persons in the year 

2013. The minimum standards for the 

elimination of trafficking in persons are 

listed in the Background section. 

Submissions must include information 

relevant and probative of the minimum 

standards for the elimination of 

trafficking in persons and should 

include, but need not be limited to, 

answering the questions in the 

Information Sought section. These 

questions are designed to elicit 

information relevant to the minimum 

standards for the elimination of 

trafficking in persons. Only those 

questions for which the submitter has 

direct professional experience should be 

answered and that experience should be 

noted. For any critique or deficiency 

described, please provide a 

recommendation to remedy it. Note the 

country or countries that are the focus 

of the submission. 

Submissions may include written 

narratives that answer the questions 

presented in this Notice, research, 

studies, statistics, fieldwork, training 

materials, evaluations, assessments, and 

other relevant evidence of local, state, 

and federal government efforts. To the 

extent possible, precise dates should be 

included. 

Where applicable, written narratives 

providing factual information should 

provide citations to sources and copies 

of the source material should be 

provided. If possible, send electronic 

copies of the entire submission, 

including source material. If primary 

sources are utilized, such as research 

studies, interviews, direct observations, 

or other sources of quantitative or 

qualitative data, details on the research 

or data-gathering methodology should 

be provided. The Department does not 

include in the Report, and is therefore 

not seeking, information on prostitution, 

human smuggling, visa fraud, or child 

abuse, unless such conduct occurs in 

the context of human trafficking. 

Confidentiality: Please provide the 

name, phone number, and email address 

of a single point of contact for any 

submission. It is Department practice 

not to identify in the TIP Report 

information concerning sources in order 

to safeguard those sources. Please note, 

however, that any information 

submitted to the Department may be 

releasable pursuant to the provisions of 

the Freedom of Information Act or other 

applicable law. When applicable, 

portions of submissions relevant to 

efforts by other U.S. government 

agencies may be shared with those 

agencies. 

Response: This is a request for 

information only; there will be no 

response to submissions. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

The TIP Report: The TIP Report is the 

most comprehensive worldwide report 

on governments’ efforts to combat 

trafficking in persons. It represents an 

updated, global look at the nature and 

scope of trafficking in persons and the 

broad range of government actions to 

confront and eliminate it. The U.S. 

Government uses the TIP Report to 

engage in diplomacy, to encourage 

partnership in creating and 

implementing laws and policies, to 

combat trafficking, and to target 

resources on prevention, protection, and 

prosecution programs. Worldwide, the 

Report is used by international 

organizations, foreign governments, and 

nongovernmental organizations alike as 

a tool to examine where resources are 

most needed. Freeing victims, 

preventing trafficking, and bringing 

traffickers to justice are the ultimate 

goals of the Report and of the U.S 

Government’s anti-trafficking policy. 

The Department prepares the TIP 

Report using information from across 

the U.S. Government, U.S. embassies, 

foreign government officials, 

nongovernmental and international 

organizations, published reports, and 

research trips to every region. The TIP 

Report focuses on concrete actions that 

governments take to fight trafficking in 

persons, including prosecutions, 

convictions, and prison sentences for 

traffickers, as well as victim protection 

measures and prevention efforts. Each 

TIP Report narrative also includes a 

section on recommendations. These 

recommendations are then used to assist 

in measuring progress from one year to 

the next and determining whether 

governments comply with the minimum 

standards to eliminate trafficking in 

persons or are making significant efforts 

to do so. 

The TVPA creates a four tier ranking 

system. Tier placement is based more on 

the extent of government action to 

combat trafficking than on the size of 

the problem, although that is a 

consideration. The Department first 

evaluates whether the government fully 

complies with the TVPA’s minimum 

standards for the elimination of 

trafficking. Governments that fully 

comply are placed on Tier 1. For other 

governments, the Department considers 

the extent of efforts to reach 

compliance. Governments that are 

making significant efforts to meet the 

minimum standards are placed on Tier 

2. Governments that do not fully comply 

with the minimum standards and are 

not making significant efforts to do so 

are placed on Tier 3. Finally, the 

Department considers Special Watch 

List criteria and, when applicable, 

moves Tier 2 countries to Tier 2 Watch 

List. For more information, the 2013 TIP 

Report can be found at http://

www.state.gov/j/tip/rls/tiprpt/2013/

index.htm. 

Since the inception of the TIP Report 

in 2001, the number of countries 

included and ranked has more than 

doubled to include 188 countries in the 

2013 TIP Report. Around the world, the 

TIP Report and the best practices 

reflected therein have inspired 

legislation, national action plans, policy 

implementation, program funding, 

protection mechanisms that 

complement prosecution efforts, and a 

stronger global understanding of this 

crime. 

Since 2003, the primary reporting on 

the United States’ anti-trafficking 

activities has been through the annual 

Attorney General’s Report to Congress 

and Assessment of U.S. Government 

Activities to Combat Human Trafficking 

(‘‘AG Report’’) mandated by section 105 

of the TVPA (22 U.S.C. 7103(d)(7)). In 

addition, the United States, through a 

collaborative interagency process, 

includes in the TIP Report an analysis 

of U.S. Government anti-trafficking 

efforts in light of the minimum 

standards to eliminate trafficking in 

persons set forth by the TVPA. 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 241 / Monday, December 16, 2013 / Notices 76185 

II. Minimum Standards for the 

Elimination of Trafficking in Persons 

The TVPA sets forth the minimum 

standards for the elimination of 

trafficking in persons as follows: 

(1) The government of the country 

should prohibit severe forms of 

trafficking in persons and punish acts of 

such trafficking. 

(2) For the knowing commission of 

any act of sex trafficking involving 

force, fraud, coercion, or in which the 

victim of sex trafficking is a child 

incapable of giving meaningful consent, 

or of trafficking which includes rape or 

kidnapping or which causes a death, the 

government of the country should 

prescribe punishment commensurate 

with that for grave crimes, such as 

forcible sexual assault. 

(3) For the knowing commission of 

any act of a severe form of trafficking in 

persons, the government of the country 

should prescribe punishment that is 

sufficiently stringent to deter and that 

adequately reflects the heinous nature of 

the offense. 

(4) The government of the country 

should make serious and sustained 

efforts to eliminate severe forms of 

trafficking in persons. 

The following factors should be 

considered as indicia of serious and 

sustained efforts to eliminate severe 

forms of trafficking in persons: 

(1) Whether the government of the 

country vigorously investigates and 

prosecutes acts of severe forms of 

trafficking in persons, and convicts and 

sentences persons responsible for such 

acts, that take place wholly or partly 

within the territory of the country, 

including, as appropriate, requiring 

incarceration of individuals convicted 

of such acts. For purposes of the 

preceding sentence, suspended or 

significantly reduced sentences for 

convictions of principal actors in cases 

of severe forms of trafficking in persons 

shall be considered, on a case-by-case 

basis, whether to be considered as an 

indicator of serious and sustained 

efforts to eliminate severe forms of 

trafficking in persons. After reasonable 

requests from the Department of State 

for data regarding investigations, 

prosecutions, convictions, and 

sentences, a government which does not 

provide such data, consistent with the 

capacity of such government to obtain 

such data, shall be presumed not to 

have vigorously investigated, 

prosecuted, convicted, or sentenced 

such acts. The Secretary of State may 

disregard the presumption contained in 

the preceding sentence if the 

government has provided some data to 

the Department of State regarding such 

acts and the Secretary has determined 

that the government is making a good 

faith effort to collect such data. 

(2) Whether the government of the 

country protects victims of severe forms 

of trafficking in persons and encourages 

their assistance in the investigation and 

prosecution of such trafficking, 

including provisions for legal 

alternatives to their removal to countries 

in which they would face retribution or 

hardship, and ensures that victims are 

not inappropriately incarcerated, fined, 

or otherwise penalized solely for 

unlawful acts as a direct result of being 

trafficked, including by providing 

training to law enforcement and 

immigration officials regarding the 

identification and treatment of 

trafficking victims using approaches 

that focus on the needs of the victims. 

(3) Whether the government of the 

country has adopted measures to 

prevent severe forms of trafficking in 

persons, such as measures to inform and 

educate the public, including potential 

victims, about the causes and 

consequences of severe forms of 

trafficking in persons; measures to 

establish the identity of local 

populations, including birth 

registration, citizenship, and 

nationality; measures to ensure that its 

nationals who are deployed abroad as 

part of a diplomatic, peacekeeping, or 

other similar mission do not engage in 

or facilitate severe forms of trafficking in 

persons or exploit victims of such 

trafficking; a transparent system for 

remediating or punishing such public 

officials as a deterrent; measures to 

prevent the use of forced labor or child 

labor in violation of international 

standards; effective bilateral, 

multilateral, or regional informationsharing and cooperation arrangements 

with other countries; and effective 

policies or laws regulating foreign labor 

recruiters and holding them civilly and 

criminally liable for fraudulent 

recruiting. 

(4) Whether the government of the 

country cooperates with other 

governments in the investigation and 

prosecution of severe forms of 

trafficking in persons and has entered 

into bilateral, multilateral, or regional 

law enforcement cooperation and 

coordination arrangements with other 

countries. 

(5) Whether the government of the 

country extradites persons charged with 

acts of severe forms of trafficking in 

persons on substantially the same terms 

and to substantially the same extent as 

persons charged with other serious 

crimes (or, to the extent such extradition 

would be inconsistent with the laws of 

such country or with international 

agreements to which the country is a 

party, whether the government is taking 

all appropriate measures to modify or 

replace such laws and treaties so as to 

permit such extradition). 

(6) Whether the government of the 

country monitors immigration and 

emigration patterns for evidence of 

severe forms of trafficking in persons 

and whether law enforcement agencies 

of the country respond to any such 

evidence in a manner that is consistent 

with the vigorous investigation and 

prosecution of acts of such trafficking, 

as well as with the protection of human 

rights of victims and the internationally 

recognized human right to leave any 

country, including one’s own, and to 

return to one’s own country. 

(7) Whether the government of the 

country vigorously investigates, 

prosecutes, convicts, and sentences 

public officials, including diplomats 

and soldiers, who participate in or 

facilitate severe forms of trafficking in 

persons, including nationals of the 

country who are deployed abroad as 

part of a diplomatic, peacekeeping, or 

other similar mission who engage in or 

facilitate severe forms of trafficking in 

persons or exploit victims of such 

trafficking, and takes all appropriate 

measures against officials who condone 

such trafficking. A government’s failure 

to appropriately address public 

allegations against such public officials, 

especially once such officials have 

returned to their home countries, shall 

be considered inaction under these 

criteria. After reasonable requests from 

the Department of State for data 

regarding such investigations, 

prosecutions, convictions, and 

sentences, a government which does not 

provide such data consistent with its 

resources shall be presumed not to have 

vigorously investigated, prosecuted, 

convicted, or sentenced such acts. The 

Secretary of State may disregard the 

presumption contained in the preceding 

sentence if the government has provided 

some data to the Department of State 

regarding such acts and the Secretary 

has determined that the government is 

making a good faith effort to collect 

such data. 

(8) Whether the percentage of victims 

of severe forms of trafficking in the 

country that are non-citizens of such 

countries is insignificant. 

(9) Whether the government has 

entered into effective, transparent 

partnerships, cooperative agreements, or 

agreements that have resulted in 

concrete and measureable outcomes 

with— 

(A) domestic civil society 

organizations, private sector entities, or 

international non-governmental 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
76186 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 241 / Monday, December 16, 2013 / Notices 

organizations, or into multilateral or 

regional arrangements or agreements, to 

assist the government’s efforts to 

prevent trafficking, protect victims, and 

punish traffickers or 

(B) the United States toward agreed 

goals and objectives in the collective 

fight against trafficking. 

(10) Whether the government of the 

country, consistent with the capacity of 

such government, systematically 

monitors its efforts to satisfy the criteria 

described in paragraphs (1) through (8) 

and makes available publicly a periodic 

assessment of such efforts. 

(11) Whether the government of the 

country achieves appreciable progress 

in eliminating severe forms of 

trafficking when compared to the 

assessment in the previous year. 

(12) Whether the government of the 

country has made serious and sustained 

efforts to reduce the demand for (A) 

commercial sex acts; and (B) 

participation in international sex 

tourism by nationals of the country. 

III. Information Sought Relevant to the 

Minimum Standards 

Submissions should include, but need 

not be limited to, answers to relevant 

questions below for which the submitter 

has direct professional experience and 

that experience should be noted. 

Citations to source material should also 

be provided. Note the country or 

countries that are the focus of the 

submission. Please see the Scope of 

Interest section for detailed information 

regarding submission requirements. 

1. How have trafficking methods 

changed in the past 12 months? For 

example, are there victims from new 

countries of origin? Is internal 

trafficking or child trafficking 

increasing? Has sex trafficking changed 

from brothels to private apartments? Is 

labor trafficking now occurring in 

additional types of industries or 

agricultural operations? Is forced 

begging a problem? 

2. In what ways has the government’s 

efforts to combat trafficking in persons 

changed in the past year? What new 

laws, regulations, policies, and 

implementation strategies exist (e.g., 

substantive criminal laws and 

procedures, mechanisms for civil 

remedies, and victim-witness security, 

generally, and in relation to court 

proceedings)? 

3. Please provide observations 

regarding the implementation of 

existing laws and procedures. 

4. Is the government equally vigorous 

in pursuing labor trafficking and sex 

trafficking? 

5. Are the anti-trafficking laws and 

sentences strict enough to reflect the 

nature of the crime? Are sex trafficking 

sentences commensurate with rape 

sentences? 

6. Do government officials understand 

the nature of trafficking? If not, please 

provide examples of misconceptions or 

misunderstandings. 

7. Do judges appear appropriately 

knowledgeable and sensitized to 

trafficking cases? What sentences have 

courts imposed upon traffickers? How 

common are suspended sentences and 

prison time of less than one year for 

convicted traffickers? 

8. Please provide observations 

regarding the efforts of police and 

prosecutors to pursue trafficking cases. 

9. Are government officials (including 

law enforcement, diplomats, and 

soldiers/peacekeepers) complicit in 

human trafficking by, for example, 

profiting from, taking bribes, or 

receiving sexual services for allowing it 

to continue? Are government officials 

operating trafficking rings or activities? 

If so, have these government officials 

been subject to an investigation and/or 

prosecution? What punishments have 

been imposed? 

10. Has the government vigorously 

investigated, prosecuted, convicted, and 

sentenced nationals of the country 

deployed abroad as part of a diplomatic, 

peacekeeping, or other similar mission 

who engage in or facilitate trafficking? 

11. Has the government investigated, 

prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced 

organized crime groups that are 

involved in trafficking? 

12. Is the country a source of sex 

tourists and, if so, what are their 

destination countries? Is the country a 

destination for sex tourists and, if so, 

what are their source countries? 

13. Please provide observations 

regarding government efforts to address 

the issue of unlawful child soldiering. 

14. Does the government make a 

coordinated, proactive effort to identify 

victims? Is there any screening 

conducted before deportation to 

determine whether individuals were 

trafficked? 

15. What victim services are provided 

(legal, medical, food, shelter, 

interpretation, mental health care, 

health care, employment, training, etc.)? 

Who provides these services? If 

nongovernment organizations provide 

the services, does the government 

support their work either financially or 

otherwise? 

16. How could victim services be 

improved? 

17. Are services provided equally and 

adequately to victims of labor and sex 

trafficking? Men, women, and children? 

Citizen and noncitizen? Members of the 

LGBT community? 

18. Do service providers and law 

enforcement work together 

cooperatively, for instance, to share 

information about trafficking trends or 

to plan for services after a raid? What is 

the level of cooperation, 

communication, and trust between 

service providers and law enforcement? 

19. May victims file civil suits or seek 

legal action against their trafficker? Do 

victims avail themselves of those 

remedies? 

20. Does the government repatriate 

victims who wish to return home? Does 

the government assist with third 

country resettlement? Does the 

government engage in any analysis of 

whether victims may face retribution or 

hardship upon repatriation to their 

country of origin? Are victims awaiting 

repatriation or third country 

resettlement offered services? Are 

victims indeed repatriated or are they 

deported? 

21. Does the government 

inappropriately detain or imprison 

identified trafficking victims? 

22. Does the government punish 

trafficking victims for forgery of 

documents, illegal immigration, 

unauthorized employment, or 

participation in illegal activities 

directed by the trafficker? 

23. What efforts has the government 

made to prevent human trafficking? 

24. Has the government entered into 

effective bilateral, multilateral, or 

regional information-sharing and 

cooperation arrangements that have 

resulted in concrete and measureable 

outcomes? 

25. Does the country have effective 

policies or laws regulating foreign labor 

recruiters? 

26. Does the government undertake 

activities that could prevent or reduce 

vulnerability to trafficking, such as 

registering births of indigenous 

populations? 

27. Does the government provide 

financial support to NGOs working to 

promote public awareness or does the 

government implement such campaigns 

itself? Have public awareness 

campaigns proven to be effective? 

28. Please provide additional 

recommendations to improve the 

government’s anti-trafficking efforts. 

29. Please highlight effective 

strategies and practices that other 

governments could consider adopting. 

Dated: December 3, 2013. 

Luis CdeBaca, 

Ambassador-at-Large, Office to Monitor and 

Combat Trafficking in Persons, U.S. 

Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2013–29860 Filed 12–13–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–00–P 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES