alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED NOVEMBER 3, 2010 rPARTMFNT OF 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION •. '.'' r-A9ftmB9!)',A 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS v'.~i OPERATIONS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

m NOV -U A 9:2S 

IN THE MATTER OF 

EMPIRE AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09NM0009 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2009-0586 

POST HEARING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

This matter came for hearing on October 26 and 27, 2010 in Portland, OR. The 

hearing transcript is forthcoming. 

WHEREFORE, the parties shall adhere to the following Post Hearing Briefing 

Schedule: 

1. Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "Complainant") shall file its 

Post-Hearing Brief on or before January 28, 2011; 

2. Federal Express, Inc. (hereinafter "Respondent") shall file its Post-Hearing 

Brief on or before February 14, 2011; and 

3. Complainant shall file its Rebuttal Brief, if any, on or before February 21, 

2011. 

licharcfjC. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment(s) - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP09NM0009 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Courtney E. Felts, Respondent's Counsel 

Staff Attorney, Federal Express, Inc. 

3620 Hacks Cross Road 

Building B, 3"" Floor 

Memphis, TN 38125-8800 

TEL: 901-434-8632 

FAX: 901-434-8283 

Lawrence W. Bierleiti, Respondent's Counsel 

1101 30* Street, NW 

Suite 500 

Washington, DC 20007 

TEL: 202-625-8355 

FAX: 202-625-4363 

Scott R. Morris, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorqpy, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7, FAA 

1601 LindAvenue, S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1417 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the foUovring address: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administratirai, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wri^t Building -

Room 2014, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Dock Lee Minter, Appellant

No. 06-18-00160-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 4th District Court of Rusk 

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR17-128). 

Opinion delivered by Justice Stevens, Chief 

Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess 

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment 

of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment by (1) replacing “Not True” 

with “Not Applicable” next to “Plea to Enhancement Paragraph(s),” and (2) replacing “True” with 

“Not Applicable” next to “Findings on Enhancement Paragraph(s).” As modified, the judgment 

of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Dock Lee Minter, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JANUARY 30, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Otto ANDERSON.

No. 60310.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 27, 1977.

Patrick McArdle, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Patrick Fanning, Asst. Dist. Atty., New Orleans, for plaintiff-ap-pellee.

*281PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1368

AN ACT

To extend the existence of the Parole Commission, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Parole

5 Commission Extension and Sentencing Commission Au6 thority Act of 2005’’.
 †

2

S 1368 ES

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXISTENCE OF THE PAROLE COM2 MISSION.

3 For purposes of section 235(b) of the Sentencing Re4 form Act of 1984 (98 Stat. 2032) as such section relates

5 to chapter 311 of title 18, United States Code, and the

6 United States Parole Commission, each reference in such

7 section to ‘‘eighteen years’’ or ‘‘eighteen-year period’’ shall

8 be deemed a reference to ‘‘21 years’’ or ‘‘21-year period’’,

9 respectively.

10 SEC. 3. PROVISION OF EMERGENCY AMENDMENT AUTHOR11 ITY FOR SENTENCING COMMISSION.

12 In accordance with the procedure set forth in section

13 21(a) of the Sentencing Act of 1987 (Public Law 100–

14 182), as though the authority under that Act had not ex15 pired, the United States Sentencing Commission shall—

16 (1) not later than 60 days after the date of the

17 enactment of this Act, amend the Federal sentencing

18 guidelines, commentary, and policy statements to

19 implement section 6703 of the Intelligence Reform

20 and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (Public Law

21 108–458); and

22 (2) not later than 180 days after the date of

23 the enactment of this Act, amend the Federal sen24 tencing guidelines, commentary, and policy state-
 †

3

S 1368 ES

1 ments to implement section 3 of the Anabolic Ster2 oid Control Act of 2004 (Public Law 108–358).

Passed the Senate July 1, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1368

AN ACT

To extend the existence of the Parole Commission,

and for other purposes.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1140 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 122
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1140

 To designate the State Route 1 Bridge in the State of Delaware as the 
                ``Senator William V. Roth, Jr. Bridge''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2005

 Mr. Carper (for himself and Mr. Biden) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

                              June 9, 2005

               Reported by Mr. Inhofe, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the State Route 1 Bridge in the State of Delaware as the 
                ``Senator William V. Roth, Jr. Bridge''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF SENATOR WILLIAM V. ROTH, JR. BRIDGE.

    The State Route 1 Bridge over the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal in 
the State of Delaware is designated as the ``Senator William V. Roth, 
Jr. Bridge''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law (including regulations), map, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the bridge described in 
section 1 shall be considered to be a reference to the Senator William 
V. Roth, Jr. Bridge.
                                                       Calendar No. 122

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1140

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the State Route 1 Bridge in the State of Delaware as the 
                  Senator William V. Roth, Jr. Bridge.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 9, 2005

                       Reported without amendment
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 163 (Friday, August 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22347]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 081597A]


South Atlantic Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) will 
hold a meeting of its Artificial Reef Habitat Sub-Group.

DATES: The meeting will be held on September 18, 1997, from 8:30 a.m. 
until 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Florida Marine Research 
Institute, 100 Eighth Avenue, SE, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
    Council address: South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, One 
Southpark Circle, Suite 306; Charleston, SC 29407-4699.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Buchanan, Public Information 
Officer; telephone: (803) 571-4366; fax: (803) 769-4520; email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bac9cfc9dbd494d8cfd9d2dbd4dbd4fad4d5dbdb94ddd5cc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="64171117050a4a0611070c050a050a240a0b05054a030b12">[email protected]</span></a>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Sub-Group will meet to review artificial 
reef description and distribution information in state, Federal and 
regional systems, and to discuss fishing and non-fishing threats to 
artificial reef habitats. The Sub-Group will also discuss 
recommendations for the Council's draft habitat policy statement on 
artificial reef habitat.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to the Council office (see ADDRESSES) by September 
8, 1997.

    Dated: August 15, 1997.
Gary C. Matlock,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 97-22347 Filed 8-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# USTRANSCOM commander seeks increased alignment with DLA

/ Published Jan. 31, 2017
PHILADELPHIA, 

The commander of U.S. Transportation Command encouraged Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support employees to consider how they would have executed their duties if the warfighter wasn’t so engaged the past 15 years.

"We have thought about our enterprise the same way for a number of years, but we -- USTRANSCOM and DLA --are evolving and incorporating new mindsets as we tackle global logistic challenges," Air Force Gen. Darren McDew said during his visit to Troop Support Jan. 19. 

While USTRANSCOM specializes in full-spectrum global transportation solutions, their mission is similar to DLA's in that they support the warfighter. And like DLA, they aim to deliver as much value to their customers as possible. 

“I really do love the way that DLA and USTRANSCOM are working together, at least from my vantage point,” he said. 

Nevertheless, he said there is room for improvement in the two organizations’ working relationship.

“It’s not about organizational change, it’s about organizational alignment,” he said. “We want the alignment, the touchpoints, the transparency, the cooperation and the teamwork to be at the right places,” he said. “We might have touchpoints that are a little different over that time period, and there are some places where we can take advantage of each other a little bit better.” 

McDew said it’s important that DLA and USTRANSCOM do not duplicate each other’s work and that they identify opportunities for increased partnership.

Air Force personnel make up just a small percentage of the Troop Support workforce. So for them, the general represented more than just another distinguished visitor.

“It’s always good to see another airman visit Troop Support, especially when that airman is the four-star general in charge of USTRANSCOM,” said Air Force Master Sgt. Woodrow Ruff, who is assigned to Troop Support as part of the Air Force’s career broadening program. “He sees things from a different perspective, so it was good to hear him emphasize continued coordination between DLA and USTRANSCOM to better support the warfighter and make each other stronger and better in doing so.”

McDew also explained what he learned about Troop Support’s reputation for getting the materiel to the service members who need it, when they need it.

“I know when I go around the world talking to folks, people don’t understand how it happens. They just appreciate that it happens. And the fact that they don’t need to know how it happens, says something about what you do. It just is,” McDew said. “Like taking a big breath of air — it just is.”
**Transcript: "Have Your Medicines Reviewed"**
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NEIL M. JOHNSON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

TRUCKEE RIVER HIGHLANDS HOA,

LLC; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-17737

D.C. No. 3:09-cv-00587-RCJ-LRL

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Robert Clive Jones, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 17, 2012** 

Before: LEAVY, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Neil M. Johnson appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his action challenging various homeowner’s association fees on his now-foreclosed

home. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

FILED

JAN 25 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-17737

dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Kuntz v. Lamar Corp., 385 F.3d

1177, 1181 n.6 (9th Cir. 2004), and for an abuse of discretion the denial of leave to

amend, Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1130 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Johnson’s action for lack of subject

matter jurisdiction. First, the court lacked diversity jurisdiction because Johnson

and several of the defendants are citizens of Nevada. See Kuntz, 385 F.3d at 1181

(requiring complete diversity of citizenship). Second, the court lacked federal

question jurisdiction because Johnson’s state law claims neither included a federal

right or immunity as an essential element nor raised a substantial federal issue. See

Provincial Gov’t of Marinduque v. Placer Dome, Inc., 582 F.3d 1083, 1086-87

(9th Cir. 2009) (requirements of federal question jurisdiction).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Johnson’s request

for leave to amend to allege due process, equal protection, or Fair Debt Collection

Practices Act claims because amendment would be futile. See Theme Promotions,

Inc. v. News Am. Mktg. FSI, 546 F.3d 991, 1010 (9th Cir. 2008).

Johnson’s remaining contentions, including regarding the expungement of

the lis pendens that Johnson recorded against a non-party, are unpersuasive.

Johnson’s pending motions, including to consolidate this appeal, are denied. 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries VI, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 3, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries VI, Inc.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Immunomedics. Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Dated: September 26, 2005            
|                                     
|/s/ CYNTHIA L. SULLIVAN              
|Cynthia L. Sullivan                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Marine aviators land at Defense Supply Center Richmond to meet, greet 

/ Published March 16, 2017
Richmond, Virginia , 
Two Marine Corps aircraft based at Marine Corps Air Station New River in Jacksonville, North Carolina landed at Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, to meet and greet the personnel from Defense Logistics Agency Aviation. 

UH-1Y Huey and AH-1W Cobra flight crews from Marine Aircraft Group 29, Marine Light Attack Helicopter Squadron 269, landed during their route to a training destination north of Virginia. The crewmembers explained elements of the helicopters and allowed staff members an up-close look at the Marine Corps aircrafts they support.
No. 9565.

#### Dunnick *v.*Dunnick, Admx.

(Decided June 19, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Franklin county.

*515
      *Mr. M. E. Thrailkill,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. J. M. Pugh*and *Mr. W. B. Page,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
# Partners in Protection, Insight into security and emergency services: Guy Simmons

/ Published May 31, 2017
Richmond, Virginia,
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 99

                 WINTHROP GROWTH INVESTORS 1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                                December 31, 1996

Supplementary Information Required Pursuant to Section 9.4 of the Partnership
Agreement (Unaudited)

1.    Statement of Cash Available for Distribution:


                                              Year Ended      Three Months Ended
                                           December 31, 1996   December 31, 1996
                                           -----------------   -----------------
Net Loss                                         $  (847,000)      $  (153,000)
Add: Depreciation and amortization                 1,711,000           465,000

Less: Cash to reserves                              (664,000)         (262,000)
                                                 -----------       -----------

Cash Available for Distribution                  $   200,000       $    50,000
                                                 ===========       ===========

Distributions allocated to Limited Partners      $   200,000       $    50,000
                                                 ===========       ===========

2.    Fees and other compensation paid or accrued by the Partnership to the
      General Partners, or their affiliates, during the three months ended
      December 31, 1996:

 Entity Receiving                      Form of
   Compensation                      Compensation                      Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------
General Partners       Interest in Cash Available for Distribution       $  --

Winthrop Management    Property Management Fee                       $    86,000
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Annual Report of TNR Technical,  Inc. (the  "registrant")
on Form 10-KSB for the year  ending  June 30, 2006 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"),  I, Wayne Thaw, Chief
Executive  Officer  and Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  registrant,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The  information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.




September 18, 2006


/s/ Wayne Thaw
    ----------
    Wayne Thaw
    Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer