alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

No. 83337



# FILE WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE, ON BEHALF OF THE HARBORVIEW MORTGAGE LOANTRUST MORTGAGE LOAN PASSTHROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-12, Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE VERONICA BARISICH, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC.; FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; AND FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE AGENCY OF NEVADA, INC., Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION This is an original petition for writ of prohibition or, in the alternative, writ of mandamus. Petitioner Wells Fargo seeks a writ of either prohibition or mandamus that would allow the underlying action, which the district court stayed, to proceed. The district court granted the stay pending a decision from the Ninth Circuit in Wells Fargo Bank v. Fidelity National Title Insurance, Case No. 19-17332. As the Ninth Circuit has issued that decision, Wells Fargo's petition is moot and no exceptions to the mootness doctrine appear to apply. See Personhood Nev. v. Bristol,126 Nev. 599, 602,

SUPREME COURT Of NEVADA

931 I947A 

# 2;2-- olutZ3

. • 'Att,tALIAS4A•:t.

4 1V..:4jA •245 P.3d 572, 574 (2010) (discussing the exceptions to the mootness

doctrine). We therefore decline to consider it. See Univ. of Nev. v. Tarkanian, 95 Nev. 389, 394, 594 P.2d 1159, 1162 (1979) (explaining that this court does not consider moot issues). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Parraguirre



### / c

, elz_42N , J. 

# Ack.“ Hardesty Pickering

cc: Hon. Veronica Barisich, District Judge Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas Sinclair Bruan LLP/Encino Early Sullivan Wright Gizer & McRae, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (01 1447A

•
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 20, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50318 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ARTURO ACEVEDO-QUINTERO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:05-CR-635-6

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Arturo Acevedo-Quintero has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Acevedo-Quintero has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Acevedo-Quintero’s response demonstrates that there is no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Acevedo-Quintero’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell , 470 F.3d 1087, 1091No. 06-50318 -2- (5th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Case *No.*10,067.

#### NEALE v. CONINGHAM.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 76.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

March Term, 1802.

Witness — Incrimination — Objection before Being Swokn.

Witness who cannot testify in a cause without criminating himself shall not be sworn.

Trespass, for assault and battery, and false imprisonment

Mr. Peacock, for plaintiff,

produced Richard Spaulding, to prove that the plaintiff was arrested and confined in prison upon a ca. sa. issued by the..defendant as a justice of the peace for Washington county, on the 28th of March, 1S01, on a judgment rendered by Amariah Frost, a justice of the peace of Prince George’s *county, on*the 24th of September, 1800. The witness objected to being sworn because he was the constable who served the ca. sa., and also the jailor who kept the plaintiff in confinement, and his testimony would criminate himself.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.)

THE COURT

refused to compel him to be sworn.

CRANCH. Circuit Judge,

eontrá. It is not an objection to his being sworn, but is a good reason for his refusing to answer any question which may criminate himself.
109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1285 

AN ACT 

To designate the Federal building located at 333 Mt. Elliott 

Street in Detroit, Michigan, as the ‘‘Rosa Parks Federal 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

S 1285 ES 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ROSA PARKS FEDERAL 

2 BUILDING. 

3 The Federal building located at 333 Mt. Elliott 

4 Street in Detroit, Michigan, shall be known and des5 ignated as the ‘‘Rosa Parks Federal Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 

9 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be 

10 a reference to the ‘‘Rosa Parks Federal Building’’. 

11 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF WILLIAM B. BRYANT ANNEX. 

12 The annex, located on the 200 block of 3rd Street 

13 Northwest in the District of Columbia, to the E. Barrett 

14 Prettyman Federal Building and United States Court15 house located at Constitution Avenue Northwest in the 

16 District of Columbia shall be known and designated as the 

17 ‘‘William B. Bryant Annex’’. 

18 SEC. 4. REFERENCES. 

19 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

20 paper, or other record of the United States to the annex 
3 

S 1285 ES 

1 referred to in section 3 shall be deemed to be a reference 

2 to the ‘‘William B. Bryant Annex’’. 

Passed the Senate October 26, 2005. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1285 

AN ACT 

To designate the Federal building located at 333 

‘‘Rosa Parks Federal Building’’. Mt. Elliott Street in Detroit, Michigan, as the
Request for Information Cinema Architects LLC (FAA-2015-4072) 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Percelli: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. 

FAA−2015−4072). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition.

z Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e., fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the 

proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload). This

information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

x Your petition references the material listed below, however the material was not submitted for the record.

Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

{ Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your

information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary 

information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by December 28, 

2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

FAA Office of Rulemaking

Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 7:36 AM 

To: Cinemarchitects@gmail.com
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Hudson Valley Holding Corp. (the
Company) for the year ending December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, James J. Landy,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and result of operations of the Company.



| |                                          
| | -----------------------------------------
| | /s/ JAMES J. LANDY                       
| |                                          
| | James J. Landy                           
| | President and Chief Executive
    Officer

Dated: March 12, 2004
<PAGE>

                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

                                  FORM 10K-A

                      AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION OR REPORT
                 FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12, 13 OR 15(D) OF
                      THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                             HARTMARX CORPORATION
              (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

                                AMENDMENT NO. 1

     The undersigned registrant hereby amends the following items, financial
statements, exhibits or other portions of its Annual Report for the fiscal year
ended November 30, 1998 on Form 10-K as set forth in the pages attached hereto:

Item 14(a) is being amended to include the following:

     Exhibits:

     Number    Description
     ------    -----------

       99      The information required by Form 11-K for 1998 for the Hartmarx
               Savings-Investment Plan (the Plan) (Commission Files Nos. 2-
               32692, 2-44774, 2-53426, 2-64613, 2-83433, 33-6194, 33-42202 and
               333-03169), including the following Plan financial statements:

                    Index to Financial Statements and Schedules.
                    Report of Independent Accountants.
                    Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Plan
                         Equity at December 31, 1998 and 1997.
                    Statement of Income and Changes in Plan
                         Equity for the Year Ended December 31, 1998.
                    Notes to Financial Statements.
                    Consent of Independent Accountants.
                    Supplementary Schedules:
                         Assets Held for Investment Purposes at
                           December 31, 1998 (Schedule G, Part I).
                         Reportable Transactions - Series of
                           Security Transactions (Schedule G, Part V).

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this amendment to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                         HARTMARX CORPORATION
                                         --------------------
                                         (Registrant)


Date:  June 22, 1999                 By: GLENN R. MORGAN
                                         ----------------------------
                                         Glenn R. Morgan
                                         Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
Review Representation Letter














EXHIBIT 10.4







AMENDMENT NO. 3

to the

SPONSORED PROJECT AGREEMENT

between

MicroChannel Technologies Corporation (Sponsor)

and the

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ISU)







WHEREAS the Sponsor and ISU mutually agree to amend the research program under the Sponsored Project Agreement with an effective date of May 1, 2005;




NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree to the following changes to the Sponsored Project Agreement and the Project:




1. Section 1.0 Shall be modified as follows:




Project Period. The (“Project Period”) of this Agreement is September 1, 2005 through 

September 30, 2008.




2. Section 3.1. shall be modified with the following additional language:




Sponsor shall make payment to ISU in the amount set forth in Exhibit A of Amendment No. 3. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of the date of the last signature affixed hereto.




3.  ISU shall conduct the work set forth in Exhibit A.




4.  ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE SPONSORED PROJECT AGREEMENT REMAIN UNCHANGED.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties agree to execute this Amendment based upon their written approval.




IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY OF

SPONSOR

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

`




BY:  /s/ Matthew Bailey

BY: /s/ Kaiyo Nedd

 Matthew Bailey

Kaiyo Nedd

Title:  Director

 

Title:   President




Date: November 2, 2007

Date: November 12, 2007




















Exhibit A




Work Plan:




The purpose of this project is to develop experimental strategies to stimulate nerve regeneration. We will examine the ability of different populations of human neural stem/progenitor cells (hNPCs) to stimulate peripheral nerve regeneration in biodegradable conduits. Human neural progenitor cells will initially be grown in vitro to characterize their differentiation potential. These hNPCs will then be seeded onto patterned substrates inside of biodegradable conduits. These conduits will then be used to bridge transected peripheral nerves in the hind-leg of a rat model to study peripheral nerve regeneration.  




Budget: 




Neural progenitor cells

$5000

Proprietary cell culture media

$6000

Cell culture supplies and reagents

$5000

Animals: Nude rats $250 each x 40

$10,000

Rat holding costs

$4000

Histology and sectioning

$4130

Indirect costs

$15,870

Total

$50,000
ACADEMYOFMODELAERONAUTICS.2015MEMBERHAROLDCARVAJALexpires:12/31/2015853790OPEN"---4•coNTESToiREciuwA"'M\f/;TURBINEFIXED·ACADEMYOFMODELAERONAUTICS-=------------------·-.---
# EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as
 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

We, the undersigned, certify that, to the best of our
 knowledge, this annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, of CAPITAL
 REALTY INVESTORS-III LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and containing the financial statements, fully complies with
 the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
 contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
 and results of operations of the small business issuer.

|               |  | CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS-III LIMITED     PARTNERSHIP                                                                                                                 
|-------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  | (Small Business Issuer)                                                                                                                                              
|               |  | by:  C.R.I., Inc.                                                                                                                                                    
|               |  | Managing General Partner                                                                                                                                             
|March 31, 2006 |  | by:  /s/ William B. Dockser                                                                                                                                          
|DATE           |  | William B. Dockser,
              Director, Chairman of the Board,
                  and Treasurer
                  (Principal Executive Officer)                   
|March 31, 2006 |  | by:  /s/ H. William Willoughby                                                                                                                                       
|DATE           |  | H. William Willoughby,
              Director, President, Secretary,
                  Principal Financial Officer and
                  Principal Accounting Officer

This
 certification accompanies this annual report and is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose, and shall
 not be deemed filed by the small business issuer for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 152 (Thursday, August 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42588]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20860]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Division of Research Grants; Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Division of Research Grants Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meetings:

    Purpose/Agenda: To review individual grant applications.
    Name of SEP: Clinical Sciences.
    Date: August 19, 1997.
    Time: 10 a.m.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Room 4138, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Anthony Chung, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4138, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1213.

    Name of SEP: Behavioral and Neurosciences.
    Date: August 20, 1997.
    Time: 2 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Room 5172, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Leonard Jakubczak, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5172, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1247.

    Name of SEP: Chemistry and Related Sciences.
    Date: November 17-18, 1997.
    Time: 8 a.m.
    Place: Ana Hotel, Washington, DC.
    Contact Person: Dr. Marjam Behar, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5218, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1180.
    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 31, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 97-20860 Filed 8-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Thomas R. “Blue” FULFORD et al., Appellants, v. Reubin O’D. ASKEW, Governor, et al., Appellees.

No. FF-49.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 8, 1978.

Rehearing Denied April 4, 1978.

*41Daniel S. Dearing, Tallahassee, for appellants.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tom Beenck, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ernest Marshall, Bradenton, and Stephen B. Calvert, Stuart, for appellees.

BOYER, Judge.

This appeal is from a final judgment entered by the trial court in an action brought by several individual fishermen and the Organized Fishermen of Florida against the Governor and Cabinet, as head of the Department of Natural Resources and various lower level administrators of the Department of Natural Resources, the Division of Marine Resources and the Marine Patrol, by which action the complainants attacked the constitutionality of 102 local acts or special acts of the legislature, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. The challenged acts are, with the exception of Chapter 370, F.S., local laws or special acts of county-wide application, which purport to regulate the type, size and use of fishing nets and the regulation of certain fishing areas, all within the three-mile limit along the Atlantic coast and in the Florida Keys and out to 10.6 miles in the Gulf of Mexico. The primary thrust of plaintiffs’ attack is that such local acts constitute an unreasonable interference with interstate commerce and that they are an unconstitutional exercise of police power. The learned trial judge, noting that acts of the legislature are presumed constitutional, held that the plaintiffs had failed to carry their burden of proving to the contrary.

Careful reading of the final judgment reveals that the trial court did not pass directly upon the validity of the subject statutes, but only held that the plaintiffs had failed to meet their burden of proving them to be unconstitutional. Accordingly this court, and not the Supreme Court, has jurisdiction (Fla.App.Rules 2.1(5)(a) and 2.2(a)(4) and Art. V, Sec. 5(3), Constitution of Florida).

It is axiomatic that legislative acts are presumed valid and that the burden is upon the party who assails an act to prove invalidity. Sub judice 102 acts were assaulted. A reading of the record reveals that most of the plaintiffs’ (appellants here) evidence was directed toward the acts in mass although it is apparent that some of that evidence could not have applied to some of the specific acts under attack. The burden was upon the plaintiffs to establish the invalidity of each act separately. Accordingly, we agree with the finding of the trial judge that the plaintiffs failed to meet their burden of proof. We do not construe the final judgment here appealed to be a holding that the subject acts are constitutional and that the final judgment is therefore res adjudicata to any further attack upon their validity.

In summary, we affirm that the plaintiffs failed to meet their burden of proof as to each individual act assailed.

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and MASON, ERNEST E., Associate Judge, concur.
Exhibit 32.2
  Certification
    Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant
    to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  Form 10-K
   1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934, and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in
    the Report.        Dated: February 25, 2010
   Form 10-K