alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      99.1





PRESS
      RELEASE


























**PRESS
      RELEASE**











NAUGATUCK
      VALLEY FINANICAL CORPORATION


ANNOUNCES
      STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM (CORRECTION)








Naugatuck,
      Connecticut (February 21,
      2008).  In the press release issued on February 19, 2008, the
      statement that the specified number of shares authorized to be repurchased
      represents approximately 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock held
      by
      persons other than Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company, is
      incorrect.  The full and corrected release is as follows:





Naugatuck
      Valley Financial Corporation
      (Nasdaq Global Market: NVSL) today announced that the Company’s board of
      directors has authorized the repurchase of up to 361,207 shares of the Company’s
      outstanding common stock, or approximately 5% of the outstanding shares of
      common stock, including the shares held by Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding
      Company.  The Company expects to begin the program as soon as
      practicable.





Repurchases,
      which will be conducted
      through open market purchases or privately-negotiated transactions, will be
      made
      from time to time depending on market conditions and other
      factors.  Repurchased shares will be held in the Company’s
      treasury.





Naugatuck
      Valley Financial Corporation
      is the holding company for Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan, headquartered
      in
      Naugatuck, Connecticut.  In addition to its main office, Naugatuck
      Valley Savings and Loan operates eight branch offices in Southwest
      Connecticut.  Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan is a
      community-oriented financial institution dedicated to serving the financial
      service needs of consumers and businesses within its market area.





This
      release contains “forward-looking
      statements” which may describe future plans and strategies, including our
      expectations of future financial results.  Management’s ability to
      predict results or the effect of future plans or strategies is inherently
      uncertain.  Factors that could affect our actual results include
      market interest rate trends, the general regional and national economic market,
      our ability to control costs and expenses, actions by our competitors and their
      pricing, loan delinquency rates, and changes in federal and state
      regulation.  As we have no control over these factors, they should be
      considered in evaluating any forward-looking statements and undue reliance
      should not be placed on such statements.  Except as required by
      applicable law or regulation, Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation disclaims
      any obligation to update such forward-looking statements.





Contact:





Naugatuck
      Valley Financial Corporation


John
      C.
      Roman


Lee
      R.
      Schlesinger


(203)
      720-5000
Exhibit 23(c)


                       [Peters Elworthy & Moore Letterhead]

NCT Group INC
20 Ketchum Street
Westport                                Our Ref:    PRC/LCT
Connecticut 06880                       Date:       12 April 2001
USA

Dar Sirs

We consent to the inclusion of our opinion on the financial  statements of Noise
Cancellation  Technologies  (Europe) Limited as of December 31, 1999 and for the
year ended  December  31, 1999 and 1998  included  in the Annual  Report on Form
10-K.

Yours faithfully

/s/ PETERS ELWORTHY & MOORE
----------------------------
    Peters Elworthy & Moore
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         253,930
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  215,742
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,000
<INVENTORY>                                     49,207
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               522,307
<PP&E>                                         649,647
<DEPRECIATION>                                 580,384
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,363,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          708,621
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,569
<OTHER-SE>                                     921,724
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,363,589
<SALES>                                      1,806,348
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,806,348
<CGS>                                          987,405
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,162,921
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,760)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                39,485
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (364,693)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (367,193)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (367,193)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

Certification of President



I, Ramon Chimelis, President, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Big Sky Industries



I

V

, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: February 2, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries II, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: January 14, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries II, Inc.
No. 00-6820.

#### Martinez *v.*Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# DLA director emphasizes strategic goals at Troop Support town hall

/ Published Jan. 11, 2017
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency director said that while DLA Troop Support has done great work supporting the warfighter over more than 15 years of conflict in the Middle East, the strategic environment is changing. 

During a town hall with DLA Troop Support employees Jan. 5 in Philadelphia, Air Force Lt. Gen. Andy Busch said that potential threats from peer-level adversaries in Europe and Asia may drive changes in the way DLA executes its mission.

“You’re doing great work, but there’s things we need to do differently going forward,” Busch told employees.

He also said that the services and combatant commanders are thrilled with Troop Support’s efforts toward DLA’s first strategic goal – Warfighter First. 

The director then discussed the second strategic goal – People and Culture – and said that DLA employees submitted 29,000 comments during the 2016 Culture Survey. Busch and other senior leaders read every one. While he can’t address each comment, he noticed trends that he aims to address.

He also said that the new Department of Defense Personnel Management and Appraisal Program, known as DPMAP, will increase communication within DLA when it’s implemented in April.

“The opportunity to provide increased and improved feedback is a good thing,” he said. 

The next strategic goal Busch addressed was Strategic Engagement. He thanked Troop Support employees for helping DLA meet its small business goals. 

“I am very grateful that in my two years on the job, I have not had to spend any effort on small business goals other than to say thank you for helping us to achieve them,” he said.

Busch then spoke about Financial Stewardship, the fourth DLA strategic goal. 

As DLA continues to support the ongoing audit, the private auditor has provided positive feedback about DLA’s transparency during the process, he said 

Busch also said he appreciated Troop Support’s impact on the agency’s cost recovery rate, reflecting the level of cost efficiency with which DLA executes its mission. 

He then discussed DLA’s fifth strategic goal – Process Excellence. He said Troop Support’s Continuous Process Improvement office “is doing a superb job.” 

He also highlighted the efforts of Ray Finch and Jontell Platts, from the Command Support Office, who recently applied process-improvement principles to improve the travel system and government travel card program at Troop Support.

Busch also discussed the impact of the changing administration in Washington.

“We (DLA) will change, but I think we’ll be fine,” Busch said. “We won’t lose any sleep over this because as long as we do our jobs, follow our policies and do right by the taxpayers, we will be OK.”
Exhibit 24(b)











POWER OF ATTORNEY








KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned director of CULP, INC., a North Carolina corporation, hereby constitutes and appoints KENNETH R. BOWLING the true and lawful agent and attorney-in-fact to sign for the undersigned as a director of the Corporation the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 2, 2010 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and to sign any amendment or amendments to such Annual Report, hereby ratifying and confirming all acts taken by such agent and attorney-in-fact, as herein authorized.








/s/
Kenneth R. LarsonKenneth R. Larson







Date:  July 15, 2010
No. 00-6956.

#### Chambers *v.*Blackwell, Former Senior Judge, Circuit Court of Missouri, 23rd Circuit.

Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Nelson AVERY v. Hayden J. DEES, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute.

No. 60555.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 1977.

In re: Nelson Avery applying for writ of certiorari.

Writ denied. The issue of the denial of good time credit may be reviewed on appeal.

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS, J.,

are of the opinion that the application should not be considered, since the appeal is now pending. La.Code Crim.Proc. art. 363.
-

A A , 

# (facil e ^te M (^ifiation , 9,fu u moH-

- Bi g Bea r Cit y Airpor t • Frenc hValle

y Airpor t 

# W^m

i

' ! - 1 , P

Pacifi c Cres t

Aviation , In c 3773 0 Sk y Canyo n R d MiuTieta , C A 9256 3
U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Docke t Managemen t

Syste m 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Wes t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mW12-14 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 Date : 6/22/201 0 T o Who mIt

May Concern : Pacifi c Cres t

Aviation , In c currentl y ha s tw o dru g testin g programs ; on e for ou r LO A an d aseparat e on e for

ou r Part 13 5 operatio nCertificat e #21PA947L
. W e woul dlike t o reques t an dexemptio n for

ou r LO A dru g testin g progra mfor 1 4 CF RPart

91.17 4 (d)an d Part 120 ; du e t o ther e bein g onl y on e pilo t that flies for th e Sceni c Tours , whic hi s als o a 13 5 pilo t for th e compan y an di s unde r ou r dru g testin g for

th e 13 5 certificate
. W e reques t thi s exenlptio n becaus e o f th e adde dexpens e t o maintai nasecon ddru g program for on e perso n o n th e LOA
. Thi s woul dnot adversel y affec t

safet y becaus e ou r

pilot s an d fiiture pilot s wil l al l b e Part 13 5 pilot s unde r

tha t drug-testin g program . W e d o not wis h t o exercis e th e privilege s outsid e o f th e Unite dStates
. Than k '•^•-''-'^^*'^-^:::';tS' ^ jallaghe r Pacifi c Cres t

Aviation , In c 951-696-016 0 offic e 951-698-001 9 fa x ig(a),pacificcrestaviation.co m

Ai r Charte r • Sceni c Tour s • Instructio n• Ai r Attac k • Reconnaissanc e 3/}J2Wlncfie!lierRd. , Murrieta , C A 9256 3 • Ph : 951-696-016 0 • Fax : 951-698-001 9
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

HOLIFIELD, ATTANASIO, and McCOY

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Stefan M.L. JOHNSON

Interior Communications Electrician Second Class (E-5), 

U.S. Navy

Appellant

No. 202300301

_________________________

Decided: 25 June 2024

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: 

Mishonda M. Mosley

Sentence adjudged 10 October 2023 by a special court-martial convened 

at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military judge sitting 

alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: confinement for nine months

and a bad-conduct discharge.1

For Appellant: 

Commander Jesse A. Schaefer, JAGC, USN

1 Appellant received 132 days of pretrial confinement credit.
United States v. Johnson, NMCCA No. 202300301

Opinion of the Court

2

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred.2

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON

Clerk of Court

2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
# DLA Distribution teams help site five states away rebuild from tornado

/ Published Feb. 6, 2017
ALBANY, Georgia, After a severe tornado ravaged Albany, Georgia, teams from Defense Logistics Agency Distribution arrived to provide services, supplies and expertise — helping the local DLA distribution center get up and running in less than two weeks.The Jan. 22 tornado, rated 3 on the common five-point severity scale, was on the ground less than an hour but tore a 71-mile path through five Georgia counties.One of those is Dougherty County, where DLA Distribution Albany, Georgia provides storage and distribution for Marine Corps Logistics Command. The cost to repair the damage at DDAG will be $38-40 million, not including damage to equipment and the fiber-optic network. The foremost concern of the DLA Distribution leadership was the safety and well-being of all 170 employees and their families. DDAG Director Rita Varner ordered an accountability review, which found that all employees and families were accounted for, with no serious injuries. And although many homes had major damage, only one was a total loss.A crew of DDAG employees was on site in 24 hours to help with cleanup. They found a dramatically different landscape: The grove of pecan trees near the entrance was gone, and many other trees had fallen or been badly damaged. Six DLA Distribution buildings had severe damage.Working with no lights, no heat, and debris everywhere, the employees rallied to get the job done. They worked long hours but pushed through and made the best of the situation — hosting an impromptu barbeque to lift everyone’s spirits.“This team has been extremely resilient,” Varner said. “They’re tired, but they keep moving, and everyone is helping out.”Arriving in the following days were a DLA Advanced Echelon Team and a DLA Distribution Expeditionary Team from New Cumberland, Pennsylvania. The ADVON teams assessed damaged buildings, stock, equipment and systems. The DDXX team brought truckloads of equipment including the mobile command trailer, a heavy-duty commercial truck, a yard truck, forklifts, generators, a rough terrain vehicle, and front-end loaders.Teams from DLA Information Operations brought the mobile emergency response center, a mobile command vehicle and a distribution operations center. The operations center was used to establish a tactical network and communications, including the Distribution Standard System. DSS manages all of DLA’s warehouse operations, including receiving, storage, consolidation, packing, shipping, inventory, inspection and workload management.  Despite these achievements, DDAG still lacked power to any buildings. DLA Troop Support came to the rescue, providing generators. The DDAG warehouses are now all operating on local, satellite and wireless support systems. All DLA Distribution employees reported to work on Monday, Jan. 30. DDAG is meeting 100 percent of requirements from its largest customer on base, Marine Corps Logistics Command, which also suffered widespread damage.However, DDAG started receiving trucks Feb. 4 and has returned to full operation.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                              UNITED STATES CODE)

      Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of TNR Technical, Inc., a New York corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

      The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2004 (the
"Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October  14, 2004                           /s/ WAYNE THAW
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Wayne Thaw
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2014253EN.01002301.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/23

---

Order of the President of the Court of 3 April 2014 — Henkel AG & Co. KGaA, Henkel France v European Commission, Denmark

(Case C-283/13 P) (1)

1

2014/C 253/32

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 215, 27.7.2013.

1

---
Exhibit
No. 32.1


Form
10-K


ExperTelligence,
Inc.


File No.
0-28453








Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of ExperTelligence, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jason Smart, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





ExperTelligence,
      Inc.Dated:
      January 13, 2010
                      By:
                      /s/ Jason
      SmartJason
      SmartChief
      Executive Officer andChief
      Financial Officer


-----------------------------------------------


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
ExperTelligence, Inc. and will be retained by ExperTelligence, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.