alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21987]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-689-000]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

August 14, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 8, 1997, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), 500 
Renaissance Center, Detroit, Michigan 48243, filed in Docket No. CP97-
689-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205, 157.212 and 157.216 of 
the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 
157.212 and 157.216) for authorization to abandon and replace a 3-inch 
orifice meter with a 2-inch positive displacement meter at its existing 
Merrill Meter Station in Lincoln County, Wisconsin, under ANR's blanket 
certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-480-000, pursuant to Section 7 of 
the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request that is 
on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    ANR states that it delivers natural gas to Wisconsin Public Service 
Corporation (WPSC) at the existing Merrill Meter Station, which 
currently consists of two 3-inch orifice meters. ANR states that with 
the proposed abandonment and replacement of the facilities, this 
station will then consist of one 2-inch positive displacement meter and 
one 3-inch orifice meter. ANR states that it will be fully reimbursed 
by WPSC for its cost of the replacement of the facilities at the 
Merrill Meter Station.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21987 Filed 8-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.2








September 29, 2015


Mr. Don Lehr, CLO
Intrexon Corporation
20374 Seneca Meadows Parkway
Germantown, Maryland 20876


Mr. David Pernock, CEO
Fibrocell Science, Inc.
405 Eagleview Boulevard
Exton, Pennsylvania 19341


Re: Termination of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Program


Dear David,


I write on behalf of Intrexon Corporation in reference to the Exclusive Channel Collaboration Agreement between Fibrocell Science, Inc. and Intrexon Corporation, dated October 5, 2012, as amended (the “ECC”).  Given the technical hurdles encountered to date with the program for the development of therapies to treat Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (the “Program”), the parties previously agreed to terminate the Program. This letter is to confirm our understanding that Intrexon and Fibrocell have elected to formally terminate the Program by mutual agreement and that, as a result, neither party will have any further obligations under the ECC with respect to the following provision of the “Field” (as defined in the ECC):
autologous human fibroblasts genetically modified to express bioactive Tenascin X locally to correct connective tissue disorders.
Moreover, neither party shall have any further obligations under the Stock Issuance Agreement, dated January 10, 2014, which agreement was executed in connection with the initiation of the foregoing Program. All other terms and conditions of the ECC shall remain in full force and effect.
Please confirm your acceptance of the foregoing by signing this letter in the space provided below and returning one executed copy to us. We appreciate and enjoy our collaboration with Fibrocell and continue to look forward to our additional projects together. 
Sincerely,
	
	
	/s/ Don Lehr

	Don Lehr

	Chief Legal Officer








Acknowledged and agreed on behalf of Fibrocell Science, Inc.:
                	
		
	By:
	/s/ David Pernock

	Name:
	David Pernock

	Its:
	Chairman/CEO
#### Gibson’s Estate.

*Auditor*— Findings *of fact*— Review.

1. An auditor’s finding of fact approved by the court below will not be disturbed unless manifest error is shown.

*Interest*— Mutual *accounts*— Decedents’ *estates*— Demand.

2. Interest on a claim against a decedent’s estate is not demandable where it appears that both the claimant and the decedent had advanced money that was used by the latter in promoting a joint enterprise, that there had been mutual accounts between them which had not been adjusted and a balance struck prior to decedent's death, and that there had not been any demand made.

Argued April 26, 1910.

Appeal, No. 98, Jan. T., 1910, by H. O. Gibson, from decrees of O. C. Erie Co., Feb. T., 1908, No. 21, and May T., 1909, No. 15, dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report in Estate of Perry A. Gibson, deceased.

Before Fell, C. J., Mestrezat, Elkin. Stewart and Moschzisker, JJ.

Affirmed.

Exceptions to report of J. M. Force, Esq., auditor.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.

*Error assigned*was in dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report.

*Henry C. Yard,*with him *T. A. Lamb,*for appellant.

*410May 24, 1910:

*Frank Gunnison,*with him *John S. Rilling*and *Henry E. Fish,*for appellee.

Per Curiam,

The appellant’s claim at the audit was for advances of money made to the decedent in the management of a business enterprise in which they were jointly interested. The exceptions to the auditor’s report and the assignments of error here relate to the finding by the auditor of the amount due the appellant and to the disallowance of interest thereon. What amount was due was a question of fact, as to which the finding of an auditor, approved by the court, will not be disturbed unless manifest error is shown. Both the appellant and the decedent advanced money that was used by the latter in promoting a joint enterprise; there were mutual accounts between them which had not been adjusted and a balance struck and there had been no demand made. Under these circumstances interest was not demandable: Gyger’s App., 62 Pa. 73; Goodwill v. Heim, 212 Pa. 595.

The order of the court confirming the auditor’s report is affirmed at the cost of the appellant.
# Land and Maritime recognizes successful CFC campaign

/ Published Feb. 8, 2017
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
DLA Land and Maritime recently closed out its 2016 Combined Federal Campaign on a positive note with a meeting of the organization’s key workers. Their efforts helped the Central Ohio West Virginia campaign raise more than $958,000 in contributions.

Land and Maritime’s efforts, which raised more than $206,000, were part of that collective drive involving 130 agencies. The campaign’s theme was – “Dollars Make a Donation, Donations Make a Difference” and more than half of Land and Maritime’s directorates reached or exceeded their organizational goals. 

“It’s exciting to take a few minutes to recognize the fruits of the labor put forth during this campaign. You made a difference and you’ll never see exactly how much, but when you consider that goodness is often magnified exponentially, your work represents the seeds of goodness,” said Land and Maritime Commander Navy Rear Admiral Michelle Skubic. She also gave kudos to the campaign captains and recognized associates who’ve worked in previous CFC campaigns.

After offering individual and collective congratulations to the team for their efforts Skubic shared her personal family experience that helps motivate her charitable energies. “Giving is a personal activity and people are more inclined to give from the heart to causes that tend to touch them personally,” she said.

While ranking as the 3rd largest employer of the 130 agencies, Land and Maritime’s campaign efforts positioned them as the largest contributor, accounting for 22 percent of the campaign’s total. 

Putting the campaign’s contributions in perspective Skubic gave examples of the purchasing power of their contributions, citing items like meals, blankets and other essentials. She also talked about Land and Maritime’s successful CFC campaign fundraisers and the changes in the works for upcoming campaigns. 

Skubic reminded the group of Land and Maritime’s workforce agility, their ability to embrace change and said they’d all adjust and see together what next year brings.A humorous slideshow of Land and Maritime’s campaign fundraisers ran in the background during the meeting. The Pie in the Face event was the top Land and Maritime CFC campaign fundraiser for the second year in a row; raising more than $2,170.

Skubic thanked the group for their volunteerism and closed the celebration with recognition certificates and team photos.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 158 (Friday, August 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21633]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[OR-050-1020-00: GP7-0258]


Notice of Meeting of John Day-Snake Resource Advisory Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Prineville District.

ACTION: Meeting of John Day-Snake Resource Advisory Council: John Day, 
Oregon; September 16-17, 1997.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A field trip and meeting of the John Day-Snake Resource 
Advisory Council will be held on September 16 and September 17, 1997 in 
John Day, Oregon. On September 16 the Council will tour the Summit Fire 
on the Malheur National Forest and the Nature Conservancy Preserve on 
the Middle Fork John Day River. On September 17, the Council will hold 
a business meeting at the Malheur National Forest Office located at 431 
Patterson Bridge Road, John Day, Oregon, from 8 a.m. to noon. The field 
tour will leave the John Day Sunset Inn, 390 West Main Street, at 7:30 
a.m. on September 16. The field tour and business meeting are open to 
the public. However, no public transportation will be provided for the 
field trip. Public comments will be received by the Council at 10:00 
a.m. on September 17. Topics to be discussed include the Interior 
Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project, Standards for Rangeland 
Health and Guidelines for Livestock Grazing on public lands, current 
issues, and forest health on Forest Service Lands and BLM lands.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James L. Hancock, Bureau of Land Management, Prineville District 
Office, 3050 NE Third Street, Prineville, Oregon 97754, or call 541-
416-6700.

    Dated: August 1, 1997.
James L. Hancock,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-21633 Filed 8-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Development Corp.,
a  Nevada  corporation  (the  "Company")  and Subsidiary, on Form 10-QSB for the
period  ended  February  28,  2005,  as  filed  with the Securities and Exchange
Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Betty-Ann Harland, Chief
Executive  Officer  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial condition and result of operations
of  the  Company.

Dated: April 19, 2005.

                                     By /s/  Betty-Ann Harland
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Betty-Ann Harland,
                                       Chief Executive Officer of
                                       International Development Corp.


<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Michael Offerman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Form 10-QSB of IEH Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within the
company, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b) [Reserved]

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

d) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function);

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
over financial reporting which could adversely affect the registrant's ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 10, 2006

/s/ Michael Offerman
-------------------------------
Michael Offerman
President (Principal Executive Officer)


                                       27
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6092

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff – Appellee, 

 v. 

MICHAEL J. THOMPSON, 

 Defendant – Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior 

District Judge. (1:05-cr-00480-TSE-1) 

Submitted: July 8, 2009 Decided: August 14, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge. 

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Michael J. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Lundberg 

Medzius, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

 Michael J. Thompson seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order granting the Government’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 

35(b) motion. In criminal cases, the defendant must file the 

notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); see United States v. Little, 

392 F.3d 671, 680-81 (4th Cir. 2004) (applying ten-day appeal 

period to appeal of a Rule 35 order). Although the time 

limitations imposed by Rule 4(b) are not jurisdictional, United 

States v. Urutyan, 564 F.3d 679, 685 (4th Cir. 2009), they “must 

be enforced by th[e] court when properly invoked by the 

government.” United States v. Mitchell, 518 F.3d 740, 744 

(10th Cir. 2008). The Government has moved to dismiss 

Thompson’s appeal as untimely. 

The district court entered its order on 

December 8, 2008. Thompson asserts that he did not receive 

notice of the order until January 5, 2009. He filed his notice 

of appeal at the earliest on January 6, 2009, after the ten-day 

period expired but within the thirty-day excusable neglect 

period. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 

F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). Because the notice of appeal was 

filed within the excusable neglect period, we remand the case to 

the district court for the court to determine whether Thompson

has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an 

2 
3 

extension of the ten-day appeal period. The record, as 

supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further 

consideration. 

REMANDED
ex10-4.htm


    EXHIBIT
      10.4

     

     

    August
      9,
      2007

    


    


    Re:           Agreement
      of Sale

    


    Gentlemen:

    


    Reference
      is made to that certain Agreement of Sale, dated August 1, 2005, as amended
      by a
      First Amendment dated June 27, 2006 and assigned in October 2006 (the
“Agreement”), between Investment Capital Researchers, Inc., a California
      corporation (“ICR”), Landbank Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation
      (“LBG”).

    


    As
      of the
      date hereof, each party desires to extinguish any and all obligations of the
      other party under such Agreement.  In consideration of the foregoing
      and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereby agree that
      the
      Agreement shall be immediately terminated in full and all obligations,
      including, but not limited to, the 200,000 shares of unissued common stock
      that
      were to be issued upon the achievement of specified milestones, of the parties
      thereunder are hereby extinguished. Please confirm that the foregoing is in
      accordance with your understanding by signing and returning to us the duplicate
      of this letter enclosed.

     

    


    


    Yours
      truly,

     

     

                                                                                                   
/s/ Doug
      Gravink                


    Doug
      Gravink

    Chief
      Executive Officer

    


    


    


    Accepted
      and agreed to

    this
      12th
      day of September, 2007:

     

    Investment
      Capital Researchers, Inc.

    


    By:  /s/
      Stephen
      Weber                           

    


    Name:                                                         
      

    


    Title:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ANDRE AUDIGE and CLAUDETTE AUDIGE

, Appellant s ,

v.

KEVIN MOORE, JACQUELINE MOORE, FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 17

- 1670

[ December 7, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; David Haimes , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 15

- 019975 (08)

.

Andre Audige and Claudette Audige, Coram, New York, pro se.

Jennifer L. Gauthier o f Ritter Chusid, LLP , Coral Springs, for appellees, Kevin Moore and Jacqueline Moore.

Beth A. Norrow of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Orlando and Barry L. Rothberg of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami, for appellee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

P ER C URI AM

.

Affirmed

.

G ROSS

, M AY and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 74-942.

#### Rizzo, Mayor of Philadelphia, et al. *v.*Goode et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.
# L_2023023EN.01001801.xml

| 25.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 23/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 23/18

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION (CFSP) 2023/164

of 24 January 2023

on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Mission in Armenia (EUMA) (EUMA/1/2023)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to the Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/162 of 23 January 2023 on a European Union Mission in Armenia (EUMA) (1), and in particular Article 8 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | By means of Decision (CFSP) 2023/162, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty on European Union, to take the relevant decisions concerning the political control and strategic direction of EUMA, including the decisions on the appointment of the Head of Mission. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By means of Decision (CFSP) 2023/162, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty on European Union, to take the relevant decisions concerning the political control and strategic direction of EUMA, including the decisions on the appointment of the Head of Mission.

| (2) | The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy proposed that Mr. Markus RITTER be appointed as Head of Mission. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy proposed that Mr. Markus RITTER be appointed as Head of Mission.

| (3) | A decision on the appointment of the Head of Mission should be taken, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

A decision on the appointment of the Head of Mission should be taken,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr. Markus RITTER is hereby appointed as Head of Mission of the European Union Mission in Armenia (EUMA) from 24 January 2023 to 20 February 2024.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 24 January 2023.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

D. PRONK

---

(1)  
  OJ L 22, 24.1.2023, p. 29.

1

---