alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Ozolutions Inc.
File No. 000-31343

   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Ozolutions Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  November  30,  2003 as filed  with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Max
Weissengruber,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002,  that:  (1) the Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section  13(a) or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934;  and (2) the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: January 21, 2004                    By:   /s/ Max Weissengruber
                                                Chief Executive Officer

   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Ozolutions Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  November  30,  2003 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
Robertson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934;  and (2) the  information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: January 21, 2004                    By:   /s/ Douglas Robertson
                                                Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Ozolutions  Inc.  and will be  retained  by  Ozolutions  Inc.  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21368]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Food Safety and Inspection Service
[Docket No. 97-49N]


Meeting of the National Advisory Committee on Microbiological 
Criteria for Foods

AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria 
for Foods (NACMCF) will hold a meeting on August 12, 13, and 14, 1997 
to discuss food safety issues related to fresh produce, meat, and 
poultry products; Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) 
process control; risk assessment; and international issues pertaining 
to Codex Alimentarius initiatives.

DATES: The meeting will be held from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on August 
12, 13, and 14, 1997.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Best West SouthCenter, 15901 
West Valley Road, Tukwila, Washington 98188. The meeting site is less 
than three miles from SeaTac International Airport.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Interested persons may file comments 
before and after the meeting. Comments should be addressed to Dr. 
Richard L. Ellis, Director, Scientific Research Oversight Staff, 
Department of Agriculture, FSIS, Suite 6913 Franklin Court Building, 
1099 14th Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20250-3700 or FAX to (202) 501-
7628.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    In the July 10, 1997, Federal Register notice announcing the July 
24 and 25 meeting of NACMCF's Fresh Produce Subcommittee, it was noted 
that the full committee would meet in August to further discuss a 
number of issue related to food safety. This meeting will feature 
morning plenary sessions followed by breakout subcommittee meetings on 
August 12 and 13. The full committee will convene on August 14. The 
meeting is open to the public on a space available basis.
    NACMCF provides advice and recommendations to the Secretary of 
Agriculture and the Secretary of Health and Human Services concerning 
the development of microbiological criteria by which the safety and 
wholesomeness of food can be assessed. NACMCF also provides advice and 
guidance to the Department of Commerce and the Department of Defense.

    Done at Washington, DC, on August 7, 1997.
Thomas J. Billy,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-21368 Filed 8-8-97; 2:31 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410-DM-P
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion on Remand filed June 3, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-01099-CR

DUSTIN ZACHARY COLE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 351st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1321571

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON REMAND

Appellant Dustin Zachary Cole appeals his conviction for credit card abuse. 

On original submission, appellant argued that there was insufficient evidence in the 

record to support the court’s costs of $374 reflected in the judgment. We agreed 

and modified the trial court’s judgment to delete the specific amount of costs

assessed. Cole v. State, No. 14-12-01099-CR; 2013 WL 6045899 (Tex. App.—

Houston [14th Dist.] Nov. 14, 2013) vacated and remanded, No. PD-1753-13; 
2

2014 WL 1512893 (Tex. Crim. App. Apr. 16, 2014). The Court of Criminal 

Appeals vacated our judgment and remanded in light of its opinion in Johnson v. 

State, 423 S.W.3d 385 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

The judgment includes an assessment of $374 in court costs. A supplemental 

clerk’s record was filed, which contains a certified, signed bill of costs listing $374

in court costs. We review the assessment of court costs on appeal to determine if 

there is a basis for the costs, not to determine whether there was sufficient evidence 

offered at trial to prove each cost. Johnson v. State, 423 S.W.3d at 390. Traditional 

sufficiency-of-the-evidence standards of review do not apply. Id.

Generally, a bill of costs must (1) contain the items of cost, (2) be signed by 

the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive payment 

for the cost, and (3) be certified. Id. at 392–93; see Tex. Crim. Proc. Code Ann. 

arts. 103.001, 103.006. The record supports the assessment of costs in this case 

because the record contains a bill of costs that contains each item of cost, is signed 

by a representative of the district clerk, who is entitled to receive payment of the 

costs, and is certified. See Johnson, 423 S.W.3d at 393. 

The trial court assessed $374 in costs against appellant. The sum of the 

itemized costs in the cost bill is $374. There being no challenge to any specific cost 

or the basis for the assessment of such cost, the bill of costs supports the costs 

assessed in the judgment. Id. at 396. The fact that the bill of costs was not prepared 

until after the court signed the judgment does not defeat the lawfulness of the bill 

of costs. Id. at 394. (“[M]atters pertaining to the imposition of court costs need not 

be brought to the attention of the trial court, including a bill of costs prepared after 

a criminal trial.”).
3

On remand, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Jamison.

Do Not Publish — TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
# Certificate O

fPublicatio n U.S . Environmenta l Protectio nAgenc y Chicago , I L 6060 4 STAT E O F ILLINOI S i U.S . E.P.A . REGIO N 

### S S - Notic e O f Propose d Renewa l O f Veolia 1 

### s Titl e V

Permi t St . Clai rCount y 

# } EAS TST . LOUI S MONITO R PUBLISHIN G CO. , INC. , a corporation , hereb y certifie s that i t i s th e publishe rofTH E MONITO R an d tha t sai d TH E MONITO R i s a weekly , secula rnewspape rofgenera l circulatio n i n sai d County , publishe d i n th e Cit yo

fEas tSt . Louis , i n sai d Count yan d State , an d that sai d newspa pe ri s a newspape ra s define d i n "A n Ac t t o revis e th e law n i n relatio n t o notices, " approve d February13,1874 , a s amended , an d that th e printe d notic e heret o annexe d an d hereb ymad e a part ofthi s certificat e ha s bee n publishe d i n sai d newspaper . THE EAST ST. LOUIS

MONITOR i n eac h an d ever

ycop yan d impressio n thereof ; that th e dat e o fth e firs t news pape rcontainin g sai d publicatio n wa s 

### OCT . 2 3 A.D . 20 _ 1 4 an d that th e dat e ofth e las t newspape rcontainin g sai d publicatio n wa s

OCT . 2 3 1 4

. A.D . 2 0

_

, an d that ANNE E. JORDAN b yresolutio n o fth e Boar d o fDirector s o fsai d Eas tSt . Loui s Monito r Publishin g Co. , Inc. , ha s bee n authorize d t o mak e thi s certificate . I N TESTIMON YWHEREO F sai d EAS TST . LOUI S MONITO R PUBLISHIN G CO. , INC . ha s cause d thi s certificat e t o b e execute d i n it s nam e b ysai d ANNE E. JORDAN

2 4 OCT , thi s A.D . 2 0 1 4 da yof

Publicatio n Fe e « 516.6 0 EAST ST. LOUIS

MONITOR

PUBLISHING

CO., INC. 

### By^^^l £jW .

Ai r ar m nauipi ' v . 

## 7 7 Wes tJackso n Blv d Chicago , I L 6060 4 Attn : Jame s R . Daughert y 

## CJ I 

## 2 7 &

n Agenc y m d Assessmen t Branc h
Exhibit 32.1



Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Immunomedics. Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:



The annual report for the year
ended June 30, 2003 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: September 23, 2003



|    | 
|--- | 
|By: | 
|    | 



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

Nottely Dam

Notla Landing

Chapman-Ford

Laurel

Blackwell

Woods

Conl e y Creek

nch

Chastain Branch

Poteete Creek

Recreation

Area

5

6

4

1

39

40

41

11

10

42

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

Nottely Dam

Notla Landing

Chapman-Ford

Laurel

Blackwell

Woods

Conl e y Creek

nch

Chastain Branch

Poteete Creek

Recreation

Area

5

6

4

1

39

40

41

11

10

42

\\alismurphy\home\mprlm\projects\landplan\maps\Nottely_land_plan\Nottely_land_plan_for_web.mxd

/

Tile: A2

Jul 24, 2008 Nottely Reservoir

Land Management Plan

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000

Feet
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 160 (Tuesday, August 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21951]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3850-000]


Virginia Electric and Power Company; Notice of Filing

August 13, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 24, 1997, Virginia Electric and Power 
Company (Virginia Power) tendered for filing a Service Agreement 
between Virginia Electric and Power Company and The Energy Authority, 
Inc., under the Power Sales Tariff to Eligible Purchasers dated May 27, 
1994, as revised on December 31, 1996. Under the tendered Service 
Agreements Virginia Power agrees to provide services to The Energy 
Authority, Inc. under the rates, terms and conditions of the Power 
Sales Tariff as agreed by the parties pursuant to the terms of the 
applicable Service Schedules included in the Power Sales Tariff.
    Copies of the filing were served upon the Virginia State 
Corporation Commission, and the North Carolina Utilities Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before August 26, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21951 Filed 8-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Michael MORRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1454.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 8, 1978.

Rehearing Denied April 3, 1978.

Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender and Paul J. Martin, Asst. Public Defender, Bar-tow, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

RYDER, Judge.

Appellant’s sole assignment of error is that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial. However, he has failed to provide this court with a transcript of the hearing on that motion. Consequently, since we must presume that a trial court’s order is correct unless the record otherwise demonstrates, we affirm appellant’s conviction. *Abascal*v. *State,*345 So.2d 397 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *Savage v. State,*156 So.2d 566 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963).

BOARDMAN, C. J., and DANAHY, J., concur.
FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS

May 15,2015

ABELACOSTA. CLERK

NO. AP-77,047

IN THE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

KENNETH THOMAS

Appellant

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee

AP-77,047

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 5/14/2015 7:43:45 PM

Accepted 5/15/2015 7:52:50 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK

'•S ¥

y j

s „^

^ /

\>

X

APPEALING THE TRIAL COURT'S CAPITAL JUDGMENT

ASSESSING THE DEATH SENTENCE BASED ON JURY VERDICT

OF GUILTY AND ANSWERS TO SPECIAL ISSUES

IN CAUSE NUMBER F86-85539-M FROM THE 194^® JUDICIAL

DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

THE HONORABLE ERNEST B. WHITE, HI, JUDGE PRESIDING

MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT

THE REPORTER'S RECORD

COMES NOW KENNETH THOMAS, by and through his

appointed attorney on appeal, John Tatum, and respectfully submits this Motion to
Supplement the Reporter's Record in the above entitled and numbered cause. In

support ofthis Motion, Appellant would show this Honorable Court the following:

I.

The Defendant, Kenneth Thomas, pleaded not guilty to the charge of

Capital Murder before the Honorable Emest B. White, Judge Presiding ofthe

194^^ Judicial District Court ofDallas County and a jury. The jury found the

Defendant guilty and punishment was assessed at death by lethal injection.

II.

The Reporter's Record has been filed in this cause.

III.

Appellant has raised issues of prejudice in the admission into

evidence of autopsy photographs introduced at trial. State's Exhibits Nos. 58-83.

The original color photographs were placed into evidence before the jury and are

necessary to aid this Court in resolving the issues raised on appeal to the Court of

Criminal Appeals.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that

this Court will grant his Motion to Supplement the Reporter's Record in this

Cause.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ John Tatum

JOHN TATUM

990 SOUTH SHERMAN STREET

RICHARDSON, TEXAS 75081

(972) 705-9200

BAR NO. 19672500

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, JOHN TATUM, do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of

the foregoing Motion to Supplement the Record was delivered to Susan Hawk,

Criminal District Attomey, Appellate Section, 11th floor, Frank Crowley Criminal

Courts Building, Dallas, Texas 75207, on this day of May, 2015.

Is/ John Tatum

John Tatum
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

I certify that this submitted e-mail attachment to file Motion to

Supplement complies with the following requirements of the Court:

1. The petition is submitted by e-mail attachment;

2. The e-mail attachment is labeled with the following

information:

A. Case Name: Kenneth Thomas

B. The Appellate Case Number: 77,047

C. The Type of Document: Motion to Supplement Record

D. Party for whom the document is being submitted: Appellant

E. The Word Processing Software and Version Used to

Prepare the Motion :

Word Perfect X7

case.

3. Copies have been sent to all parties associated with this

/s/JohnTatum 5/14/15

(Signature of filing party and date)

John Tatum

(Printed name)

John Tatum, Attorney at Law

Emailed Copy of Motion
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1316 

To authorize the Small Business Administration to provide emergency relief 

to shellfish growers affected by toxic red tide losses. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 27, 2005 

Mrs. SNOWE (for herself, Mr. KERRY, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. CHAFEE, and Mr. 

KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To authorize the Small Business Administration to provide 

emergency relief to shellfish growers affected by toxic 

red tide losses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Red Tide Emergency 

5 Relief Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds that— 

8 (1) shellfish growers, known as 

9 ‘‘aquaculturists’’, from the Schoodic Peninsula in 
2 

•S 1316 CPS 

1 Maine to Buzzards Bay in Massachusetts have suf2 fered substantial economic injury due to the worst 

3 occurrence of toxic algae bloom, known as ‘‘Red 

4 Tide’’, along the New England Coast since 1972; 

5 (2) toxins produced by the Red Tide algae con6 taminate shellfish like clams and mussels, making 

7 them unsafe for people and animals to eat, forcing 

8 the extended closure of shellfish beds along contami9 nated areas; 

10 (3) hundreds of shellfish growers have been af11 fected by the Red Tide, and losses industrywide are 

12 estimated at $3 million a week; 

13 (4) shellfish growers are currently considered to 

14 be agricultural enterprises, and are therefore ineli15 gible for economic injury disaster loans available to 

16 other small business concerns through the Small 

17 Business Administration; 

18 (5) shellfish growers are only eligible for emer19 gency loans through the Farm Service Agency of the 

20 Department of Agriculture under limited cir21 cumstances; and 

22 (6) the Small Business Act should be amended 

23 to make shellfish growers eligible for emergency 

24 small business assistance, as a complement to assist25 ance otherwise offered through Federal programs. 
3 

•S 1316 CPS 

1 SEC. 3. AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE DISASTER ASSISTANCE TO 

2 AQUACULTURE ENTERPRISES. 

3 Section 18(b)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 

4 U.S.C. 647(b)(1)) is amended— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘aquaculture,’’; and 

6 (2) by inserting before the semicolon at the end 

7 ‘‘, other than aquaculture’’. 

Æ
No. 99-7911.

#### Wardell *v.*Colorado.

Ct. App. Colo. Certio-rari denied.
EXHIBIT 21.	

AMC ENTERTAINMENT INC.  AND SUBSIDIARIES (AND JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATIONS)

AMC ENTERTAINMENT INC.,  (Delaware)

American Multi-Cinema, Inc.,  (Missouri)

AMC Entertainment International, Inc.,  (Delaware)

AMC Entertainment International Limited,  (United Kingdom)

AMC Entertainment EspaZa S.A.  (Spain)
Actividades Multi-Cinemas E Espectaculos, LDA  (Portugal)

AMC Theatres of  U.K. Limited,  (United Kingdom)

AMC Europe S.A.,  (France)	

Japan AMC Theatres, Inc.  (Japan)

AMC Sweden Theatres AB (Sweden)

National Cinema Network, Inc.  (Delaware)

	National Cinema Network of Canada, Inc.  (Canada-Nova Scotia)

	AMC Realty, Inc.  (Delaware)

		Centertainment, Inc.  (Delaware)

			Centertainment Development, Inc.  (Delaware)

				Centertainment Bev Holdings, LLC  (Delaware)

					Burbank Entertainment Village, L.L.C. (Delaware)	

AMC License Corp.  (Delaware)

AMCPH Holdings, Inc.  (Missouri)
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 5 

77 WEST JACKSO N BOULEVAR D 

CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590 

REPLY TO THE ATTENTION OF: 

Joseph Kellmeyer 

Thompson Coburn LLP 

One US Bank Plaza £ 

St. Louis, MO 63101 

Dear Mr. Kellmeyer: 

I am writing because EPA Region 5 has been contacted by two Members of Congress about two 

letters purportedly sent to us by your client, Veolia ES (Doug Harris) on March 29,2013 and 

August 2,2013. EPA did not receive either letter, either by mail or by electronic means. In 

fact, the only way EPA became aware of the letters is because Veolia apparently sent them to 

Sen. Durbin and a downstate Illinois Congressman. Veolia then requested the Members to 

obtain responses from EPA - to correspondence EPA had not received. 

This is troubling on several levels, particularly because the letters Veolia claims to have sent to 

EPA accuse EPA of breaching a verbal agreement. That accusation is incorrect. Veolia 

apparently forwarded those unfounded claims about a verbal agreement to the Members without 

an opportunity for EPA to respond. 

I am also troubled by a representation in the first sentence of Veolia's August 2 letter. 

Mr. Harris wrote to Regional Administrator Susan Hedman stating, "I appreciate your 

willingness to take time to meet with us on the issues discussed below." The statement makes 

a false record; it assumes a communication, and agreement, between Regional Administrator 

Hedman and Veolia that did not occur. 

To avoid further misunderstanding, I suggest we centralize communication between Veolia and 

EPA Region 5. In the future, please direct all correspondence to: 

Eric Cohen, Chief 

Multi-Media Branch II 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

77 West Jackson Blvd., 

Chicago, Illinois, 60604 

(312) 886-0703 

cohen.eric@epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable •• Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (100% Post-Consumer) 
2 

Please note that counsel will be present if a meeting is scheduled between Regional 

Administrator Hedman and Veolia. • 

Sincerely, 

Robert A. Kaplan 

Regional Counsel