alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1  PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, John W. Peters, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Suncrest Global Energy Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: May 9, 2007 /s/ John W. Peters John W. Peters, Principal Executive Officer
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
      10.8

     

     

    COLLATERAL
      AGENT AGREEMENT

    


    


    The
      undersigned, Gary W. Pollack, Esq.,
      personal attorney for Roy Sciacca will act as collateral agent in regards to
      the
      items on Exhibit “B” to the February 22, Beach Boys Memorabilia Purchase
      Agreement entered into between Roy Sciacca and Focus.

    


    1.  The
      undersigned shall be
      the only key holder and the items will be held under the undersigned’s exclusive
      control, subject to the undersigned’s priority lien.

    


    2.   The
      Exhibit “B”
memorabilia collections shall be stored at “the Fortress in downtown Miami,
      Florida.

    


    3.  The
      undersigned shall be
      reimbursed for the past storage of the collection in the warehouse located
      at
      12701 S.W. 124 Street, where it has been stored since the dispute with the
      Beach
      Boys began and shall be reimbursed for the storage at the Fortress, prior to
      its
      discharge.

    


    4.   The
      designated
      agent for Focus is Baruch Halpern, 18851 N.E. 29 Avenue, Suite 500, Aventura,
      Florida 33180, (786) 528-1400, who is acknowledged by collateral agent and
      who
      further agrees that Baruch Halpern  shall receive notice by overnight
      mail  as agent for lenders, so that a corporate officer of Global
      Realty Development Corporation  may be present upon removal of said
      item from the Beach Boys Memorabilia collection.  Should any item in
      the collection be placed for sale or auction Baruch Halpern shall further
      receive notice of the transfer of any proceeds from individual item’s sales to
      the undersigned’s Florida Bar trust account.

    


    5.  The
      collateral agent
      shall control access to the collateral so that access may only be had under
      his
      supervision or recorded by collateral agent or his representatives.

    


    6.  The
      undersigned’s law
      offices are located at One Southeast Third Avenue, Suite 1260, Miami, Florida
      33131, (305) 373-9676.

    


    Dated
      this ____ day of July,
      2007.

    


    _______________________________

    Gary
      W. Pollack
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2405 

To suspend temporarily the duty on thermoplastic biodegradable polymer 

blend. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. LIEBERMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on thermoplastic 

biodegradable polymer blend. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. THERMOPLASTIC BIODEGRADABLE POLYMER 

4 BLEND. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2405 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Thermoplastic biodegradable 

polymer blend containing 

1,4-benzenedicarboxylic 

acid, dimethyl ester, polymer with 1,4-butanediol and 

hexanedioic acid (CAS No. 

55231–08–8) and/or 1,4- 

benzenedicarboxylic acid 

polymer with 1,4 butanediol 

and decanedioic acid (CAS 

No. 28205–74–5) and 

Starch (CAS No. 9005–25– 

8) and 1,4-dioxane-2,5- 

dione, 2,6-dimethyl-(3R, 

6R)-polymer with rel-(3R, 

6S)-3,6-dimethyl-1,4 

dioxane-2,5-dione and (3S, 

6S)-3,6-dimetyl-1,4-dioxane2,5-dione (CAS No. 9051– 

89–2) and 1,2,3- 

propanetriol (CAS No. 56– 

81–5) (provided for in subheading 3913.90.50) ........... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Koffie Agyman, Appellant.

[613 NYS2d 27]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Patterson, J.), rendered June 29, 1993, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The information supplied to police officers in a face-to-face meeting with an unidentified informant, together with a police *732officer’s observation of what appeared to be a bulge in the defendant’s waistband, provided the police officers with a reasonable suspicion that the defendant had committed a crime involving a weapon *(see, People v Arthurs,*24 NY2d 688; *People v Irizarry,*177 AD2d 457; *People v Sattan,*200 AD2d 640; *People v Price,*194 AD2d 634; *People v Thorne,*184 AD2d 797; *People v DeJesus,*169 AD2d 521; *People v Castro,*115 AD2d 433, *affd*68 NY2d 850). The reasonable suspicion justified not only the stop but the frisk *(see, People v Sattan, supra).*"Since the lawful frisk produced a gun providing probable cause for the defendant’s arrest” *(People v Thorne, supra,*at 798), the court properly denied suppression. Furthermore, by pleading guilty, the defendant effectively waived appellate review of any alleged *Rosario*violations *(see, People v Sebastian,*197 AD2d 647; *People v West,*184 AD2d 743). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, O’Brien and Florio, JJ., concur.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T S HA UN DA RNE L L GA R L AN D, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. A . K . S K R I B N E R ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 15079 D . C . N o . 1 : 0 6 - c v - 0 0 1 9 8 - O WW G SA ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia O l i ve rW . W a nge r , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r22, 2010 ** B efo re: W A L L A C E , H A W K IN S , an dT H O M A S , C i rcu i tJu d g es. T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y di sm i ss ed S haun D arnel l G ar l and’ s ( “ G ar l and”) c la im s a g a in s t d e f

e n d a n t L e w is , w ith o u t p r e ju d ic e , s o th a t G a r lan dc o u ldr e - f ile th e m in th e p r o p e rv e n u e . See 28 U . S . C . § 1391( b) ( “ A c i vi l a c t i on . . . m a y. . . be b r o u g h t o n lyin . . . aj udi c i a l di s tr i c ti n w hi c h as ubs t a nt i a l pa rtof the e ve nt s or 

# FI LED OC T 05 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 15079 2 o m is s io n s g iv in g r is e to th e c la im o c c u rr e d , o ras u b s tan tia l p a rt o f p r o p e rtyth a t is th e s u b je c t o f th e a c tio n is s itu a te d. . .” ) ; s e e al s o F e d. R . C i v. P . 21 ( pe rm i tt i ng th e c o u rt, o n ju s t te rm s , to d r o p ap a rty ) . C ontr a ryt o G a r l a nd’ s c ont e nt i on, the di s tr i c tc ourtdi d note rrbyde ny i ng hi s m ot i on t o tr a ns f

e rhi m f r om s t a t e t o f

e de r a l c us t odybe c aus e he ha d a l r e a dy b e e n tr a n s f

e rr e dto ad if

f e r e n t s ta te p r is o n . Se e D i l le yv . G unn , 64 F . 3d 1365, 1368 (9th C i r. 19 95 ). G a r la n d ’s r e m a in in g c o n te n tio n s a r e u n p e r s u a s iv e . AF F I RME D.
#### WINFIELD MANUFACTURING COMPANY and Insurance Company of North America v. Inner Jean BOHANON.

No. 50645.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 5, 1978.

McCoy & Wilkins, Joseph T. Wilkins, III, Jackson, for appellants.

*119William S. Lawson, Tupelo, for appellee.

Before SUGG, WALKER and COFER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
This page was intentionally left blank.This page was intentionally left blank.This page was intentionally left blank.This page was intentionally left blank.This page was intentionally left blank.This page was intentionally left blank.This page was intentionally left blank.This page was intentionally left blank.
#### Kenneth Edward MORGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. GG-215.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 9, 1978.

Rehearing Denied March 9, 1978.

Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Michael H. Davidson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

BOYER, Judge.

Appellant (hereinafter defendant) seeks reversal of a final judgment adjudicating him guilty of attempted burglary. An examination of the record reveals that defendant accompanied co-defendant Harold Luke to a warehouse which Luke admittedly broke into. Defendant was apprehended running from the scene with two pliers and a screwdriver in his pocket. There was no evidence that defendant entered the building, attempted to enter the building, or encouraged, aided or abetted Luke in doing so. The law is well settled that a person may be convicted on circumstantial evidence if such evidence is consistent with his guilt and also inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence. Mere suspicion, probabilities or suppositions are insufficient. *Driggers*v. *State,*164 So.2d 200 (Fla.1964); *Lyons v. State,*47 So.2d 541 (Fla.1950). The circumstantial evidence in this case does not meet that standard.

Accordingly, we hold the learned trial judge erred in denying defendant’s motion for discharge made at the close of the state’s case and again at the close of all of the evidence.

The judgment of guilt is reversed and defendant is discharged from the conviction and sentence here appealed.

McCORD, C. J., and MELVIN, J., concur.
No. 99-7567.

#### Sullivan *v.*Oregon.

Ct. App. Ore. Certiorari denied.
#### Thomas BLOUNT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1878.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 10, 1978.

Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, Bar-tow, and Stephannie L. Da Costa, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen. Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment and sentence appealed is affirmed, but this case is remanded for correction of the form of the judgment. The present judgment recites that appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense charged, when he was actually tried and found guilty as charged. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and HOBSON and GRIMES, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 145 (Tuesday, July 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19948]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Commission
[A-570-506]


Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware From the People's Republic of 
China; Extension of Time Limit for Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of extension of time limit for antidumping duty 
administrative review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is extending the 
time limit for preliminary results of the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on porcelain-on-steel cooking ware from the 
People's Republic of China (PRC) to no later than December 31, 1997. 
The review covers the period December 1, 1995 through November 30, 
1996. This extension is made pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (the Act).

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 29, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne King or Lorenza Olivas, Office 
of CVD/AD Enforcement VI, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone (202) 482-
2786.

POSTPONEMENT: Under section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department may 
extend the deadline for completion of an administrative review if it 
determines that it is not practicable to complete the review within the 
statutory time limit of 365 days. The Department find that it is not 
practicable to complete the preliminary results of the 1996 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on porcelain-on-
steel-cooking ware from the PRC within this time limit. See Memorandum 
to the Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration (public 
document, on file in the Central Records Unit, Room B-099 of the Main 
Commerce Building).
    In accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department 
will extend the time for completion of the preliminary results of this 
review from September 2, 1997 to no later than December 31, 1997.

    Dated: July 18, 1997.
Jeffrey P. Bialos,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-19948 Filed 7-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
No. 00-6869.

#### McCarver v. Lee, Warden.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2007 

To amend the African Growth and Opportunity Act to extend the thirdcountry fabric rule, to add South Sudan to the list of countries eligible 

for designation under that Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 15, 2011 

Mr. BAUCUS (for himself, Mr. HATCH, Mr. KERRY, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. WYDEN, 

Mr. BLUNT, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. BROWN of Massachusetts, Mr. CARDIN, 

Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. COONS, and Mr. THUNE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the African Growth and Opportunity Act to extend 

the third-country fabric rule, to add South Sudan to 

the list of countries eligible for designation under that 

Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO THE AFRICAN GROWTH AND 

4 OPPORTUNITY ACT. 

5 (a) EXTENSION OF AGOA THIRD-COUNTRY RULE.— 

6 Section 112(c)(1) of the African Growth Opportunity Act 

7 (19 U.S.C. 3721(c)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘SepVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:52 Dec 21, 2011 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2007.IS S2007

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2007 IS

1 tember 30, 2012’’ each place it appears in the text and 

2 in the heading and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2015’’. 

3 (b) DESIGNATION OF SOUTH SUDAN.—Section 107 

4 of the African Growth Opportunity Act (19 U.S.C. 3706) 

5 is amended by inserting ‘‘Republic of South Sudan (South 

6 Sudan).’’ after ‘‘Republic of South Africa (South Afri7 ca).’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1245 

To suspend temporarily the duty on phosphoric acid, lanthanum salt, cerium 

terbium-doped. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 14, 2005 

Mr. CORNYN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on phosphoric acid, 

lanthanum salt, cerium terbium-doped. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PHOSPHORIC ACID, LANTHANUM SALT, CE4 RIUM TERBIUM-DOPED. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.04.76 Phosphoric acid, lanthanum 

salt, cerium terbium-doped 

(CAS No. 95823–34–0) 

(provided for in subheading 

3206.50.00) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 
2 

•S 1245 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1286 

To require States to report data on medicaid beneficiaries who are employed. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2005 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself and Mr. CORZINE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To require States to report data on medicaid beneficiaries 

who are employed. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Care Account5 ability Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STATE REQUIREMENT TO REPORT DATA ON MED7 ICAID BENEFICIARIES WHO ARE EMPLOYED. 

8 (a) REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—Section 1902(a) of 

9 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)) is amended 

10 in the first sentence— 
2 

•S 1286 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph 

2 (66); 

3 (2) by striking the period at the end of para4 graph (67) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by inserting after paragraph (67) the fol6 lowing new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(68) provide for the annual reporting by the 

8 State, using data only from applications by individ9 uals for medical assistance under the State plan, on 

10 each employer in the State with 50 or more employ11 ees who received medical assistance under this title 

12 at any time during the previous year, such reporting 

13 to include with respect to the employer (A) the name 

14 and address of the employer, (B) the number of em15 ployees who receive such medical assistance during 

16 the previous year, which may include a separate list17 ing of the numbers of part-time and full-time em18 ployees if such data is available, (C) the number of 

19 individuals who receive such medical assistance dur20 ing the previous year who are spouses or dependents 

21 of such employees, (D) the cost to the State of pro22 viding such medical assistance during the previous 

23 year to such employees, spouses, and dependents, 

24 and (E) the ratio of employees who receive such 

25 medical assistance during the previous year to the 
3 

•S 1286 IS

1 total employees in the State during that previous 

2 year.’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to 2006 and each 

5 subsequent year. 

6 (c) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than July 1, 2006, 

7 the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall provide 

8 for an initial mid-year report by each State with a State 

9 plan approved under title XI or XIX of the Social Security 

10 Act of the information described in section 1902(a)(68) 

11 of such Act, as added by subsection (a). 

12 (d) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act 

13 shall be construed as superseding requirements for the 

14 protection of patient privacy provided for under section 

15 264(c) of the Health Insurance Portability and Account16 ability Act of 1996 (42 U.S.C. 1320d–2 note), under part 

17 C of title XI of the Social Security Act, or under any other 

18 provision of Federal law. 

Æ