alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

# Written Statement of
the President and Chief Executive Officerof The Middleton Doll CompanyPursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350

Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, the undersigned President and
Chief Executive Officer of The Middleton Doll Company (the Company), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report of Form 10-KSB of the Company for
the period ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Date:    March 23, 2007

| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| | /s/ Salvatore L. Bando               
| | Salvatore L. Bando                   
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1363 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prevent dividends received 

from corporations in tax havens from receiving a reduced tax rate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 30, 2005 

Mr. BAUCUS (for himself, Mr. JEFFORDS, and Mr. KERRY) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prevent 

dividends received from corporations in tax havens from 

receiving a reduced tax rate.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION TO THE DEFINITION OF QUALI4 FIED FOREIGN CORPORATION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (ii) of section 1(h)(11)(C) 

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to divi7 dends on stock readily tradable on United States securities 

8 market) is amended by striking ‘‘by such corporation if 

9 the stock’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘by such cor10 poration if— 
2

•S 1363 IS

1 ‘‘(I) the stock with respect to 

2 which such dividend is paid is readily 

3 tradable on an established securities 

4 market in the United States, and 

5 ‘‘(II) such corporation is created 

6 or organized under the laws of a for7 eign country which has a comprehen8 sive income tax system which the Sec9 retary determines is satisfactory for 

10 the purposes of this paragraph.’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 this section shall apply to dividends received after the date 

13 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43332-43333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21434]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory 
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will 
be open to the public.
    Name of Committee: Dermatologic and Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory 
Committee.
    General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and 
recommendations to the agency on FDA regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on September 4 and 5, 1997, 
8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Location: Holiday Inn, Versailles Ballrooms I, II, and III, 8120 
Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD.
    Contact Person: Tracy Riley or John B. Schupp, Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research (HFD-21), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-5455, or FDA Advisory 
Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the 
Washington, DC area), code 12534. Please call the Information Line for 
up-to-date information on this meeting.
    Agenda: The committee will hear presentations and discuss data 
submitted regarding the new drug application (NDA) 20-785, 
Synovir<SUP>TM</SUP> (thalidomide capsules, Celgene Corp.), for 
treatment of erythema nodosum leprosum.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or 
views,

[[Page 43333]]

orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee. Written 
submissions may be made to the contact person by August 22, 1997. Oral 
presentations from the public will be scheduled between approximately 
8:30 a.m. to 9 a.m., and between approximately 1 p.m. to 2 p.m. on 
September 4, 1997. Time allotted for each presentation may be limited. 
Those desiring to make formal oral presentations should notify the 
contact person before August 22, 1997, and submit a brief statement of 
the general nature of the evidence or arguments they wish to present, 
the names and addresses of proposed participants, and an indication of 
the approximate time requested to make their presentation. The agency 
encourages investigators, academicians, members of the pharmaceutical 
industry, consumer groups, and others with information relevant to the 
topic to respond to the contact person.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: August 7, 1997.
William B. Schultz,
Acting Lead Deputy Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 97-21434 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 E0 02 4 . MARTS v . MARTS.

Bro o k e C h ri s ty M art s h as fi l ed an em erg en cy m o t i o n s eek i n g a 4 5 -d ay

ex t en s i o n of t i m e t o fi l e a n o t i ce o f ap p eal fro m an o rd er t hat

, am o n g o th er t h i n g s
,

m o di fi es ch i l d cu st o d y

. Th e o rd er i s s u b ject t o d i rect ap p el l at e rev iew u n d er OCGA

§ 5 -6 -3 4 (a) (1 1 ) (p ro v i d i n g fo r d i rect ap p el l at e rev iew o f “ [a] l l j u d gm en ts o r o rd ers

i n ch i l d c u s t o d y cas es award i n g
, refu s i n g t o ch an g e, o r m o d i fy i n g ch i l d cu s t o d y o r

h o l d i n g o r d ecl i ni n g t o ho l d p ers o n s i n co n tem pt o f s uch ch i l d cu s t o d y ju d g m en t o r

o rd ers ”). Th i s co u rt h as t h e au t h o ri t y t o g ran t an ex t en s i o n fo r t h e m ov an t t o fi l e a

n o t i ce o f d i rect ap peal p u rs uan t t o OCGA § 5 -6 -3 9 (a) (1 ), b u t t h at ex t en s i o n can n ot

b e fo r m ore t h an 30 d ay s

. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 9 (c) (p erm it t in g o ne ex t en s i on wh i ch

“ s h al l n o t ex ceed t h e t i m e o t h erwi s e al l o wed fo r t he fi li n g o f t h e n o t i ces i n i t i al l y ”).

W e t h erefo re GRANT t h e m o v an t a 3 0 -d ay ex t en si o n

. Th e m o v an t s h al l h av e

t h ro u g h an d i n cl ud i n g J an u ary 1 7

, 2 0 2 2 t o fi l e h er n o t i ce o f ap p eal in t he tri al co u rt

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. December 17, 2021

12/17/2021
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Eugene PASCHAL, Jr., Appellee.

No. II-414.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 20, 1978.

Rehearing Denied May 12, 1978.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and A. S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

*74Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, for appellee.

McCORD, Chief Judge.

State seeks review of the trial court’s order suppressing certain inculpatory statements made by appellee/defendant. Testimony revealed that upon arrival at the scene of an alleged attempted murder, a police officer questioned the victim, defendant’s wife, regarding the incident. The victim implicated defendant in the offense and indicated that he was in their house next door. The officer entered the house and asked defendant what had happened. After defendant made several inculpatory statements, he was placed under arrest and read the *Miranda*warnings, which he acknowledged he understood. Defendant then made other inculpatory statements. At the police station, defendant made further statements in a recorded statement. Trial court ordered all statements made by defendant suppressed. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

The initial statements made by defendant were not the product of custodial interrogation and thus were not inadmissible due to the failure to advise defendant of his *Miranda*rights. Although defendant had been implicated in the crime, when the officer entered the house to ask what happened, defendant had not been placed under arrest nor had his freedom of action been deprived in any significant way. The officer’s question was akin to the investigatory on-the-scene questioning referred to in *Miranda v. Arizona,*384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). Cf. *State v. Barnes,*245 So.2d 108 (Fla. 3 DCA 1971); *Melero v. State,*306 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3 DCA 1975); *United States v. Montos,*421 F.2d 215 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1022, 90 S.Ct. 1262, 25 L.Ed.2d 532 (1970). The defendant’s second statements were properly admissible since they were made after *Miranda*warnings had been given and a waiver of those rights had been shown.

We agree that the taped statements were inadmissible under the principles enunciated in *State v. Prosser,*235 So.2d 740 (Fla. 1 DCA 1970), and *Jones v. State,*346 So.2d 639 (Fla. 2 DCA 1977). That portion of the order suppressing the taped statement is, therefore, AFFIRMED. The order is otherwise REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent herewith.

BOYER and SMITH, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43133-43134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21268]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[PA 042-4067b; FRL-5874-1]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Pennsylvania; Approval of Definitions for the Pennsylvania VOC and 
NO<INF>X</INF> RACT and New Source Review Regulations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP) 
revision submitted by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. This revision 
establishes definitions for twenty-seven terms used in the new source 
review and reasonably available control technology (RACT) regulations. 
The intended effect of this action is to approve the definitions in 
Pennsylvania regulation, Chapter 121.1. In the Final Rules section of 
this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP revision as a 
direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this 
as a noncontroversial SIP revision and anticipates no adverse comments. 
A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final 
rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this proposed

[[Page 43134]]

rule, no further activity is contemplated in relation to this rule. If 
EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn 
and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent 
final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second 
comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on 
this action should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received in writing by September 11, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to David L. Arnold, 
Chief, Ozone/CO and Mobile Sources, Mailcode 3AT21, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region III, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, 
Pennsylvania 19107. Copies of the documents relevant to this action are 
available for public inspection during normal business hours at the 
Air, Radiation, and Toxics Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region III, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 
19107; Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of 
Air Quality, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 
17105.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia H. Stahl, (215) 597-9337, at 
the EPA Region III address above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the information provided in the Direct 
Final action of the same title which is located in the Rules and 
Regulations Section of this Federal Register.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

    Dated: August 4, 1997.
Marcia E. Mulkey,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 97-21268 Filed 8-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 160 (Tuesday, August 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21950]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3815-000]


Virginia Electric and Power Company; Notice of Filing

August 13, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 24, 1997, Virginia Electric and Power 
Company (Virginia Power) tendered for filing an unexecuted Service 
Agreement between Virginia Electric and Power Company and Amoco Energy 
Trading Corporation under the Power Sales Tariff to Eligible Purchasers 
dated May 27, 1994, as revised on December 31, 1996. Under the tendered 
Service Agreements Virginia Power agrees to provide services to Amoco 
Energy Trading Corporation under the rates, terms and conditions of the 
Power Sales Tariff as agreed by the parties pursuant to the terms of 
the applicable Service Schedules included in the Power Sales Tariff.
    Copies of this filing were served upon the Virginia State 
Corporation Commission, and the North Carolina Utilities Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before August 26, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21950 Filed 8-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 158 (Friday, August 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43766-43767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21636]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice #2579]

Bureau of Political-Military Affairs; Determination Under the 
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961

    Pursuant to Section 654(c) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, 
as amended (``the Act''), notice is hereby given that the Acting 
Secretary of State has made a determination pursuant to the Foreign 
Operations, Export Financing and Related Programs

[[Page 43767]]

Appropriations Act, 1994, the Foreign Operations, Export Financing and 
Relating Programs Appropriations Act, 1995, and the Foreign Operations, 
Export Financing and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1996, and has 
concluded that publication of the determination would be harmful to the 
national security of the United States.

    Dated: July 31, 1997.
Thomas E. McNamara,
Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs.
[FR Doc. 97-21636 Filed 8-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-M
```
**EXHIBIT
      23**








**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**








We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
      First
      Federal Bankshares, Inc. on Form S-8 (No. 333-82143) of our report relating
      to
      our audits of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over
      financial reporting dated September 13, 2007, which appears in this Annual
      Report on Form 10-K of First Federal Bankshares, Inc. for the year ended June
      30, 2007.








/s/
                McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLPMcGLADREY
                & PULLEN, LLP








Des
      Moines, Iowa


September
      13, 2007
# **EXHIBIT 31.2**

Certification

I, Richard G.Wasielewski, certify that:

1.               I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of Nortech Systems, Inc. and Subsidiary;

2.               Based on myknowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport on such evaluation; and

c)              Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s 

1

----

auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a)              All significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)             Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: March 8, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Richard G. Wasielewski |
|---------------------|--------|----------------------------|
|                |   | Richard G. Wasielewski     |
|                |   | Chief Financial Officer    |

 

2

----
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  Aviation
  Business
  Vendor Information Hub
  Table of Contents
  Details
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       4,152,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               31,461,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,032,000
<INVENTORY>                                 34,676,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            73,056,000
<PP&E>                                      33,141,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             112,669,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       33,430,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       546,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,051,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               112,669,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           200,917,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              158,092,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            34,043,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,065,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,717,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,901,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,816,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54
        

</TABLE>