alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED
STATES


SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington,
D.C.  20549








FORM
8-K





CURRENT
REPORT





Pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities
Exchange Act of 1934








Date
      of Report (date of earliest event reported):
            May
      13, 2008








PROXIM
      WIRELESS CORPORATION(Exact
      name of registrant as specified in its
charter)








Delaware
            000-29053
            04-2751645(State
      or other jurisdiction of
              incorporation)
            (Commission
      file number)
            (IRS
      employer identification no.)








2115
      O’Nel Drive, San Jose, CA
            95131(Address
      of principal executive offices)
            (Zip
      code)








Registrant’s
      telephone number, including area code:
            (408)
      731-2700





Not
      Applicable(Former
      name or former address, if changed since last
  report)








Check the
appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):




o  Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
230.425)




o  Soliciting
material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14a-12)




o  Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))




o  Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))













Item
2.02  Results of Operations and
Financial Condition.





On May
13, 2008, Proxim Wireless Corporation issued a press release announcing
financial results for its first quarter ended March 31, 2008.  A copy
of that press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.








Item
9.01  Financial Statements and
Exhibits.





(d)           Exhibits





See Exhibit Index.





SIGNATURE





Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
duly authorized.





PROXIM
      WIRELESS CORPORATIONDated:
      May 13, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Brian
      J. SeredaBrian
      J. SeredaChief
      Financial Officer





EXHIBIT
INDEX








Number
            Title99.1
            Press
      release dated May 13, 2008.





2
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Troop Support hosts ‘intersection’ of clothing and textiles industry, customers 

By Michael TuttleDLA Troop Support

                Cherry Hill, New Jersey  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Troop Supportclothing and textilesindustrySteven ShapiroC&TDLA
#### Patricia Lee VOGT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 51439.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 22, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 28, 1978.

Robert W. Pope of Law Offices of Robert W. Pope, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and C. Marie King, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *State v. Bales,*343 So.2d 9 (Fla.1977). The issues raised by appellant that do not go to the constitutional validity of Section 796.07, Florida Statutes, are without merit.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.
### NUMBER 13 - 1 3 - 00 2 26 - CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ BRUCE OLSON AND GERALD SANSING , A ppellants ,
v. CARLOS GARCIA , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant s , Bruce Olson and Gerald Sansing, attemp t ed to perfect an appeal from

a n order den ying summary judgment signed on February 12, 2013 , in cause no.
07

- 06573

- A

. Upon review of the documents b efore the Court, it appeared that there was no final, appealable judgment dated February 12, 2013 . On June 5, 2013 , t he Clerk of2

this Court notified appellant s of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.1, 42.3. Appellant s were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of th e notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant s respond ed to the Court ’s notice by provi ding a copy of the handwritten docket sheet which has an entry dated February 12, 2013 stating the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is denied.
The Nueces County Clerk’s Office has informed this Court that no judgment was
entered on February 12, 20 13

. In terms of appellate jurisdiction, appellate courts only have jurisdiction to review final judgments and certain interlocutory orders identified by
statute. Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp ., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). The Court, having considered the documents on file and appe llant s ’ failure to correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a),( c). PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed the 1st day of August , 201 3

.
July 24, 2014 

Mr. Donald Dillman 

Managing Director, Flight Operations 

Airlines for America 

1301 Pennsylvania Avenue 

Suite 1100 

Washington, DC 20004 

Dear Mr. Dillman: 

This is in response to your April 7, 2014, letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA-2012-

0560) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Air Transport 

Association of America, Inc., dba Airlines four America (A4A) for an exemption from 

§ 61.39(b)(2) of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). 

In reviewing your petition, we note that A4A also submitted a similar petition on 

April 7, 2014, on the same subject, requesting that current Exemption No. 10556 be 

changed to reflect regulatory references amended as a result of regulations that were a 

part of the final rule titled Pilot Certification and Qualification Requirements for Air 

Carrier Operations issued on July 15, 2013 (78 FR 42324). 

As indicated in Exemption No. 11016, which we granted in response to your petition, 

§ 61.39(b)(2) permits an applicant for an airline transport pilot certificate with an airplane 

category multiengine class rating or airline transport pilot certificate with an airplane type 

rating to take the practical test with an expired knowledge test if the applicant (1) passed 

the knowledge test after July 31, 2014, and (2) is employed as a flightcrew member by a 

part 119 certificate holder conducting operations under part 121 at the time of the 

practical test and has satisfactorily accomplished the certificate holder’s approved initial 

training program. 1

1

 In anticipation of the impending statutory requirement for all pilots in part 121 operations to hold 

an ATP certificate by August 2, 2013, A4A petitioned the FAA for a grant of exemption for its 

member carriers that would permit SICs who completed an air carrier’s approved SIC training 

program to take the practical test with an expired knowledge test. The FAA granted the exemption 

on June 21, 2012. Former § 61.39(b) only permitted pilots who had completed an air carrier’s pilot 

in command training program to take the practical test with an expired knowledge test. 

 
 2 

 

Since the relief you seek has been granted in Exemption No. 11016, which expires 

July 31, 2014, we will take no further action on your petition. A copy of that exemption 

is enclosed. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda D. Courtney 

Manager, Aircraft and 

 Airport Rules Division 

Enclosure
No. 99-1078.

#### Kernan, Warden *v.*Henry.

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                             WALL DATA INCORPORATED
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                               -------------------------------------------
                                                  1997            1996            1995
                                               -----------     -----------     -----------
<S>                                            <C>             <C>             <C>        
BASIC
Total weighted average shares outstanding        9,245,286       9,058,380       9,223,949
                                                ==========      ==========     ===========
Net income                                      $2,251,000      $4,193,000     $ 7,251,000
                                                ==========      ==========     ===========
Net income per share                            $     0.24      $     0.46     $      0.79
                                                ==========      ==========     ===========

DILUTED
Average shares outstanding                       9,245,286       9,058,380       9,223,949
Net effect of dilutive stock options based
  on the treasury stock method using the
  average market price                             640,791         662,244         803,083
                                                ----------      ----------     -----------
Total weighted average shares outstanding        9,886,077       9,720,624      10,027,032
                                                ==========      ==========     ===========
Net income                                      $2,251,000      $4,193,000     $ 7,251,000
                                                ==========      ==========     ===========
Net income per share                            $     0.23      $     0.43     $      0.72
                                                ==========      ==========     ===========
</TABLE>
No. 00-6864.

#### Arencibia *v.*Moore, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
### The Conterminous United States Mineral Assessment Program; background information to accompany folio of geologic, geochemical, geophysical, remote sensing, and mineral resource maps of the Wallace 1 degree x 2 degrees Quadrangle, Montana and Idaho

By: Jack Edward HarrisonDavid L. LeachM. Dean KleinkopfCarl L. LongLarry C. RowanRichard F. Marvin

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir920

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-14678

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

District Court No. 0:12-cv-60180-WJZ

CLAUDETTE JONES,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

 versus

SHERIFF OF BROWARD COUNTY, 

ADALBERTO RODRIGUEZ,

Individually,

GREGORY LOSE,

Individually,

 Defendants-Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Florida

_______________

(April 17, 2015)

Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Case: 14-14678 Date Filed: 04/17/2015 Page: 1 of 2 
2

PER CURIAM:

In this case, Plaintiff Claudette Jones pulled her car into a bank’s 

handicapped parking space without a handicapped parking placard hanging from 

her rear view mirror or an appropriate parking sticker on her car’s license plate. 

Defendant Gregory Lose, a police officer monitoring the handicapped parking

spaces—because, according to the bank, they were being used unlawfully—

approached Jones and asked to see her driver’s license. Jones refused Officer 

Lose’s request, stating: “You have no right to see that.” Officer Lose therefore 

arrested her.

In Count I of Jones’s amended complaint, she alleged that this encounter 

constituted a “stop and seizure” in violation of the Fourth Amendment.1 Officer 

Lose pled the defense of qualified immunity and moved for summary judgment. 

The District Court granted Officer Lose’s motion for summary judgment on Count 

I. Jones appeals. We affirm. First, Officer Lose had arguable reasonable 

suspicion to conduct an investigatory stop. And when Jones refused to show him 

her driver’s license, Officer Lose had arguable probable cause to arrest her for 

driving without a current driver’s license.

AFFIRMED. 

 1

 We assume that Count I was brought under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth 

Amendment, which incorporates the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and 

seizures. See Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 655–56, 81 S. Ct. 1684, 1691–92, 6 L. Ed. 2d 1081

(1961). 

Case: 14-14678 Date Filed: 04/17/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

Certification of President



I, Ramon Chimelis, President, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Big Sky Industries V, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: February 18, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries II, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: January 5, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries II, Inc.
Promissory Note issued to Lazard Funding Limited LLC



 Exhibit 10.12 
  
 PROMISSORY NOTE 
  

			
	 Borrower:
	  	Rock Acquisition Corp. of
	 	  	30 Rockefeller Plaza
	 	  	62nd Floor
	 	  	New York, New York 10020
		
	 Lender:
	  	Lazard Funding Limited LLC
		
	 Principal Amount:
	  	$100,000.00

  
 1. FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Rock
Acquisition Corp. promises to pay to Lazard Funding Limited LLC, at such address as may be provided in writing to Rock Acquisition Corp., the principal sum of one hundred thousand ($100,000.00) USD or such lesser amount, as the case may be, equal to
the funds advanced by Lazard Funding Limited LLC to or on behalf of Rock Acquisition Corp., with interest payable on the unpaid principal at the rate of 3.60 percent per annum, calculated half-yearly not in advance. Documentation to substantiate all
amounts advanced to or on behalf of Rock Acquisition Corp. pursuant to this Note shall be attached hereto as such funds are so advanced. 
  
 2. This Note will be repaid in full on the earlier of (i) April 1, 2008 and (ii) seven days following the consummation of an initial public offering of
Rock Acquisition Corp.’s securities. 
  
 3. At any time, Rock Acquisition
Corp. may pay the outstanding balance then owing under this Note to Lazard Funding Limited LLC without further bonus or penalty. 
  
 4. This Note will be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of New York. 
  
 5. If any term, covenant, condition or provision of this Note is held by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, it is the parties’ intent that such provision be reduced in scope by the court only to the extent deemed necessary by that court to render the provision reasonable and enforceable and the
remainder of the provisions of this Note will in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated as a result. 
  
 6. All costs, expenses and expenditures including, and without limitation, the reasonable legal costs incurred by Lazard Funding Limited LLC in enforcing this Note as a result of any default by Rock Acquisition Corp.,
will be added to the principal then outstanding and will immediately be paid by Rock Acquisition Corp. 
  
 7. This Note will inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of Rock Acquisition Corp. and Lazard Funding Limited LLC. Rock Acquisition Corp.
waives presentment for payment, notice of non-payment, protest and notice of protest. 
  
  







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF Rock Acquisition Corp. has duly affixed its
signature by a duly authorized officer under seal on this 1st day of October, 2007. 
  
 SIGNED, SEALED, AND DELIVERED 
 this 1st day of October, 2007. 
  
  

			
	Rock Acquisition Corp.
	
	 
		
	By:	 	/s/ Donald G. Drapkin        
	 	 	Name:  Donald G. Drapkin
	 	 	Title:    Chief Executive Officer and President