alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Energy supports relief efforts in Nepal

By Christopher GoulaitDLA Energy Public Affairs

                Nepal  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

humanitarian aidNepalearthquakeAIR CardDLA Energy
EXHIBIT 32

    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Georgetown  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Robert E. Balletto, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,
Joseph W. Kennedy, Senior Vice President,  Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and in  connection  with this
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB,  that we have reviewed the Form 10-QSB and that
to the best of our knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the Company's financial condition and results of
            operations as of the date and for the periods covered by the Report.


Date: November 10, 2006            /s/ Robert E. Balletto
                                   --------------------------------------
                                   Robert E. Balletto
                                   President and Chief Executive Officer
                                   (Chief Executive Officer)


                                   /s/ Joseph W. Kennedy
                                   --------------------------------------
                                   Joseph W. Kennedy
                                   Senior Vice President, Treasurer and
                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                   (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1339 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 136
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1339

                          [Report No. 109-246]

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2005

                 Referred to the Committee on Resources

                            October 7, 2005

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To reauthorize the Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design Program 
                              Act of 1994.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Junior Duck Stamp Reauthorization 
Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    The Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design Program Act of 1994 
(16 U.S.C. 719 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating the first section 6 (16 U.S.C. 719c), 
        relating to authorization of appropriations, as section 7 and 
        moving the section so as to appear at the end of the Act; and
            (2) in section 7 (as redesignated by paragraph (1)) by 
        striking ``2001 through 2005'' and inserting ``2006 through 
        2010''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 136

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1339

                          [Report No. 109-246]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To reauthorize the Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design Program 
                              Act of 1994.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 7, 2005

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Employees surpass annual food drive goal fourth year in a row

By Mikia MuhammadDLA Troop Support Public Affairs

                PHILADELPHIA  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Feds Feed FamiliesPhilabundanceDLA Troop Support
#### Ex parte Craig R. McLAREN.

77-151.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 22, 1977.

EMBRY, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER and ALMON, JJ., concur.
#### State of Missouri, Respondent, *vs.*William A. Brigham, Appellant.

1. Practice, *criminal*— Oosts, *taxation of*— Section 4, p. 349, Wagn. Stat., relating to costs to be paid by the State in cases of acquittal, refers only to costs that have accrued at the trial, and which have not been previously adjudged against either party. (Compare Wagn. Stat. 2 18, p. 1104.)

*Appeal from Vernon County Circuit Court.*

*W. P. Johnson*& *A.T.*Holcomb, for Appellant.

*Jno. A.*Hockaday, *Att'y Gen’l,*for Respondent,

cited: Wagn. Stat. § 6, p. 1039; p. 1104, §§ 16, 17, 18.

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant was indicted for embezzlement, and at a term of the court, upon his application, the cause was continued at his costs, and judgment was rendered against him therefor. At a subsequent term he was tried and acquitted, and he. then filed his motion to set aside and vacate the judgment rendered against him for costs,-^and have the same taxed up against the State.

This motion was overruled and exceptions were taken to the ruling. It is now insisted that as the defendant was acquitted the State was liable ¡¿for all the costs that accrued throughout the whole trial, and in support of this view we are referred to the statute relating-to costs in criminal cases.

By section 4 (Wagn. Stat. p. 349) it is provided that, *"in*all capital cases, and those in which imprisonment in the penitentiary is the sole punishment for the offense, if the defendant is acquitted, the costs shall be paid by the State.”

But this section only has reference to the costs that accrued at the trial which had not previously been specially adjudged against either party. If at a previous term there had been a judgment against the defendant for costs, they would not be comprehended within the intendment of the section. If there was any doubt about the legislative will in this regal’d, we think it is made perfectly plain by referring to the statute regulating criminal practice, which declares, that,“ verdicts may be set aside, *259and new trials awarded on the application of the defendant, and continuances may be granted to either party, in criminal cases, for like causes, and under like circumstances, as in civil cases.” (Wagn. Stat. p. 1104, § 18.) This we think is decisive of the ease and renders the question too plain to admit of or require argument.

Judgment affirmed.

All the judges concurring.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries V, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 18, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries V, Inc.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2444

JOHN M. SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusBARBARA A. MORGAN, Individually and as Solicitor for the Second Judicial Circuit of the State of South Carolina, Defendant - Appellee, and BUSTER EDWARDS, Individually and as Agent of State Law Enforcement Division, an Agency ofthe State of South Carolina; STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, an Agency of the State of South Carolina, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofSouth Carolina, at Aiken. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA96-2763-8-1) Submitted: May 11, 1999 Decided: May 27, 1999 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.2 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lex A. Rogerson, Jr., Lexington, South Carolina, for Appellant. Paul H. Derrick, LIDE, MONTGOMERY & POTTS, P.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: John M. Smith appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee Morgan on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. On appeal, Smith frames the issue as whether the district court erred in holding that his claims against Morgan for acts alleged to be outside of the scope of her prosecutorial immunity were barred by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1


  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Big Sky Industries I,
Inc. (the  "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Carl
Olivieri , Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


    Date: February 27, 2008                         /s/Carl Olivieri
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Carl Olivieri
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 158 (Friday, August 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21688]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[ID957-1430-00]


Idaho: Filing of Plats of Survey

    The plat of the following described land was officially filed in 
the Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, Boise, Idaho, 
effective 9:00 a.m. August 1, 1997.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of portions of the 
subdivisional lines, the subdivision of section 27, and the survey of 
certain lots in sections 27 and 28, T. 3 N., R. 2 E., Boise Meridian, 
Idaho, Group 982, was accepted, August 1, 1997.
    This survey was executed to meet certain administrative needs of 
the National Interagency Fire Center. All inquiries concerning the 
survey of the above described land must be sent to the Chief, Cadastral 
Survey, Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 1387 South 
Vinnell Way, Boise, Idaho 83709-1657.

    Dated: August 1, 1997.
Duane E. Olsen,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Idaho.
[FR Doc. 97-21688 Filed 8-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-M
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 130 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 130

   To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district of 
                               Nebraska.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2005

   Mr. Hagel (for himself and Mr. Nelson of Nebraska) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district of 
                               Nebraska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRICT JUDGESHIP FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA.

    (a) In General.--The President shall appoint, by and with the 
advice and consent of the Senate, 1 additional district judge for the 
district of Nebraska.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table under section 
133(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking the item 
relating to Nebraska and inserting the following:

    ``Nebraska....................................                 4''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries IV, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 2, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries IV, Inc.
No. 00-756.

#### Stewart *v.*Adolph Coors Co. et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Raeder *v.*Monks, Appellant.

*Judgment*— Opening *judgment*— Findings *of fact.*

Where on a rule to open a judgment, the court finds from competent testimony that the ground alleged by the defendants for opening the judgment is not sustained, the Supreme Court will not reverse the order discharging the rule, in the absence of clear error.

Argued April 11, 1910.

Appeals, Nos. 257 and 258, Jan. T., 1909, by defendants, from order of C. P. Luzerne Co., Dec. T., 1908, No. 644, discharging rules to open judgment in case of W. L. Reader v. James S. Monks et al.

Before Fell, C. J., Brown, Mestrezat, Potter and Elkin, JJ.

Affirmed.

Rule to open judgment. Before Ferris, J.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.

*270May 16, 1910:

*Error assigned*was order discharging rule to open the judgment.

*James L. Lenahan,*with him *Edward A. Lynch,*for appellants.

*M. J. Mulhall,*for appellee.

Per Curiam,

These appeals are from an order discharging a rule to open a judgment for rent entered upon a written lease. Four persons were named in the body of the lease as lessees but only three of them signed it. All four, however, entered into possession of the premises, paid rent, sublet the property and jointly took all the benefits of the lease. The ground of the application by the defendants to open the judgment was that they had signed the lease upon the assurance by the lessor that the fourth person named as lessee would also sign it. The court found that the contention of the defendants was not sustained by the testimony. Such a finding as this will not be set aside unless it is shown that it is clearly erroneous. This has. not been done.

The order of the court is affirmed at the cost of the appellant.
#### LOUIS FRYHLING v. EVENS HARDWARE COMPANY.1

March 27, 1908.

Nos. 15,156—(6).

Action in the district court for Mille Lacs county to recover $700 for the alleged negligence of defendant in laying certain roofing material. At the close of the trial before Qvale, X, defendant’s motion to dismiss the action was granted. From the judgment of dismissal entered thereon, plaintiff appealed.

Affirmed.

*M. L. Oormany,*for appellant

*Ohas.*A. *Diclcey,*for respondent

1

 Reported in 115 N. W. 1133.

PER CURIAM.

The parties hereto entered into a contract whereby the defendant, in consideration of a stipulated price to be paid to it by the plaintiff, agreed to furnish and lay upon the building of the plaintiff certain roofing material known as “Cary roofing material,” which was designated by the plaintiff. There was no warranty or representation as to the material, but the defendant undertook to lay it upon the roof of the plaintiff’s building in a good and workmanlike manner. The complaint alleged that the defendant did not so *532lay *the material,*but that be laid it so carelessly and negligently that the roof leaked, whereby the plaintiff was damaged in the sum of $700. The answer put this allegation in issue. On the trial, and at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, the trial court, on motion of the defendant, dismissed the action on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to establish his cause of action. The plaintiff appealed from the judgment of dismissal.

If the evidence was sufficient to make a prima facie ease for the jury it was error to dismiss the action, otherwise not.

The gist of the plaintiff’s action was the alleged! improper manner in which the defendant laid the roofing. The fact that the roof leaked and the plaintiff was damaged thereby is immaterial if the roofing material was properly laid. The evidence of the plaintiff’s own witnesses showed that the roofing was properly laid.

Judgment affirmed without statutory costs, the defendant having failed to comply with rule as to filing brief.