alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### KUSTER ENTERPRISES, INC., a Florida Corporation, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent.

No. FF-83.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 15, 1977.

Carlos Alvarez, Mahoney, Hadlow & Adams, Jacksonville, for petitioner.

George L. Waas, H. Reynolds Sampson, Gen. Counsel, State Dept, of Transportation, Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Kuster files its petition for review from an order of DOT refusing Kuster’s rule making petition which would have permitted the hauling of 14 feet wide prefabricated pools. The order of denial stated generally that with the single exception of boats, the Department’s position had been consistent throughout the years limiting permits for overweight loads to a maximum of twelve feet. DOT in its brief also admitted that it had recently adopted an emergency rule allowing permit applications for the hauling of mobile modular homes, the width of which is from twelve feet to fourteen feet. Fla.Admin.Code Rule 14ER77.

Kuster argues that DOT’s allowance of fourteen feet wide boats and mobile homes on Florida highways and its denial of such permits to manufacturers of prefabricated swimming pools of similar size is a denial of equal protection of the laws. DOT, however, asserts a rational basis for its permitting practices.

This court cannot adjudicate Kuster’s claim in the absence of certain facts not addressed by DOT’s order. These facts should include but not necessarily be limited to a resolution of the following questions: What significant distinctions are present in the dimensions of fourteen feet wide boats and mobile homes which are permitted upon the highways which are not present in the width dimensions of fourteen feet prefabricated swimming pools? What *1093additional burdens would be placed upon Florida highways by issuing a permit such as requested by Kuster?

We therefore remand under authority of Section 120.68(6), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1976), for a fact finding proceeding of these disputed facts. DOT shall then enter an order setting forth separate findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by Section 120.59, Florida Statutes (1975).

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1



                      SUBSIDIARIES OF IRONSTONE GROUP, INC.



AcadiEnergy, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a 100%-owned subsidiary of the
Company.

Belt Perry Associates, Inc., an Arizona corporation, ("BPA") is a 100%-owned
subsidiary of the Company.

Belt Perry Associates, Inc., a California corporation, is 83.33% owned by BPA
and 16.67% owned by the Company.

DeMoss Corporation, a California corporation, is a 100%-owned subsidiary of the
Company.

TaxNet, Inc., an Arizona corporation, is a 100%-owned subsidiary of BPA.
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Ethelbert WORRELL, Appellee.

No. FF-454.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 15, 1977.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Michael H. Davidson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Ethelbert Worrell, in pro per. and William J. Sheppard, Jacksonville, for appellee.

UPON MOTION FOR MODIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

Although our per curiam opinion of 18 November 1977, 354 So.2d 989, affirmed the order of the trial court appealed, we did not intend to nor do we affirm the trial court’s disregard of *Cappetta v. Wainwright,*203 So.2d 609 (Fla.1967), which we adhere to and which the trial court should have followed. Nevertheless, for other reasons which it is unnecessary that we discuss here, we affirm the order appealed.

McCORD, C. J., arid MILLS and BOYER, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000723610
<NAME> STRATUS COMPUTER, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1997
<CASH>                                          178611
<SECURITIES>                                     81070
<RECEIVABLES>                                   162616
<ALLOWANCES>                                      8307
<INVENTORY>                                      76635
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                532573
<PP&E>                                          404294
<DEPRECIATION>                                  255503
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  750361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           148696
<BONDS>                                            887
<COMMON>                                           276
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      600499
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    750361
<SALES>                                         489213
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                688275
<CGS>                                           252487
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   481032
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (12877)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  95018
<INCOME-TAX>                                     20904
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              74114
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     74114
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.01



</TABLE>
#### Seymour HECKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1503.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 14, 1978.

*169Alan I. Karten of Grusmark, Jaffe & Karten, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert L. Bogen, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed on authority of *State v. Zawistowski,*389 So.2d 315 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).

REVERSED.

CROSS and DOWNEY, JJ., and WEAVER, SIDNEY M., Associate Judge, concur.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 BRUCE PUMA, as Personal 2 Representative of THE ESTATE 3 OF SUSAN GERARD, 4 Plaintiff-Appellant, 5
v. NO. A-1-CA-36290 6 BRENDA WALL, 7 Defendant-Appellee. 8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY 9 Sylvia Lamar, District Judge 10 Albuquerque Legal and Fiduciary 11 Bruce Joseph Puma, Jr. 12 Albuquerque, NM 13 for Appellant 14 Robert Richards 15 Santa Fe, NM 16 for Appellee 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION 18 ZAMORA, Judge. 192 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 1 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 2 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 3 {2} AFFIRMED. 4 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 5

_______________________________ 6 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 7 WE CONCUR : 8

_________________________________ 9 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 10

_________________________________ 11 STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge 12
No. 99-7856.

#### Anderson *v.*Walker, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Dexter BENNER and Lynn Benner, his wife, Appellants, v. Clayton E. ROYCE and Joan G. Royce, his wife, Appellees.

No. GG-330.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 27, 1978.

Paul M. Harden of Smith, Davenport, Peek & Bloom, Jacksonville, for appellant.

William P. White, III, Robert C. Nichols, Jacksonville, Hamilton D. Upchurch, St. Augustine, and Delbridge L. Gibbs of Marks, Gray, Conroy & Gibbs, Jacksonville, for appellee.

BOYER, Judge.

Appellants, who were defendants in the trial court, seek review and reversal of a summary final judgment quieting title to lands in Duval County.

Appellees, who were plaintiffs in the trial court, filed a quiet title action against defendants and others. In their sworn complaint they deraigned title from February 1943 and alleged that a certain deed recorded March 24, 1975 purporting to convey the *143subject land from the plaintiffs to one Henry D. Williams was a forgery. The defendants claimed title under a deed from Henry D. Williams.

Our examination of the record reveals that the plaintiffs sufficiently complied with the requirements of F.S. 65.061 and that *Baltzell v. McKinnon,*57 Fla. 355, 49 So. 546 (1909) and *Brickell v. Trammell,*77 Fla. 544, 82 So. 221 (1909), relied on by defendants (appellants) are not here applicable.

In support of summary judgment appel-lees filed an affidavit unequivocally stating that they did not execute the deed under which the defendants claimed title and that it is a forgery. No counter affidavit was filed. We therefore find that the file, as it existed at the time the learned trial judge entered the summary judgment here appealed, did not reflect a genuine issue as to any material fact and that the trial judge therefore did not err in entering summary judgment.

Appellants having failed to demonstrate error the judgment appealed is

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and MELVIN, J., concur.
Exhibit 10.33





 


February 28, 2005


North Atlantic Operating
Co., Inc. 

257 Park Avenue South 

New York, New York 10010


Gentlemen:


 


Reference is made to the Amended
and Restated Distribution and License Agreement dated as of November 30, 1992, between us relating to the distribution of Zig Zag
cigarette paper booklets and related products in the United States (the “U.S. Agreement”) and in Canada (the “Canadian
Agreement”) (collectively, the “Distribution Agreements), each as amended.


This will confirm the parties’
agreement, pursuant to Section 3(d) of each of the Distribution Agreements, as follows:


 


The parties agree that pricing based on the foregoing shall be in effect retroactively with respect to all
orders received after December 31, 2004.










	 	 	 
	1.	The Consumer Price Index for the five year period commencing January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2009 shall continue to be: for the United States, the United States Consumer Index for the Northeast urban region, as currently provided in Section 3(b) of the U.S. Agreement, and for Canada, the Canadian Consumer Price Index as currently provided in Section 3(b) of the Canadian Agreement.
	 	 	 
	2.	The currency adjustment formula set forth in Section 3(c) of each of the Distribution Agreements shall continue in the same ratio as currently reflected in Section 3(c) for the five year period commencing January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2009, except that the ratio shall be expressed in Euros instead of French Francs based on the original conversion rate of French Francs into Euros as follows:
	 	 	 
	 	(a)	All references in
    Section 3 (c) to 4.5 FF or the number 4.5 shall instead be to 0.6860206 € or 0.6860206 and
	 	 	 
	 	(b)	All reference in
    Section 3 (c) to 3.5 FF or the number 3.5 shall instead be to 0.5335716 € or 0.5335716.




 


The parties agree that pricing
based on the foregoing shall be in effect retroactively with respect to all orders received after December 31, 2004.


 





 






    	 



    	 



    

 


If you are in agreement with the foregoing
please return to us a copy of this letter duly executed by you.


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	Bollore S.A.
	 	 	 
	 	By: 	Cédric Bolloré
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Cédric Bolloré











 





	Agreed to and accepted:
	 	 
	North Atlantic Operating Co. Inc.
	 	 
	By: 	/s/ James Dobbins 



	 


 



    	 



    	 



    

 








	 	 	North Atlantic Operating Company Inc
	 	 	Attn: Mr James Dobbins
	 	 	257 Park Avenue South
	 	 	New York, NY 10010
	By Fax (3 pages)	 
	& by Courier (Saga Express)	 
	 	 	 
	CP/MH/LT2005–38	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	February 28, 2005
	 	 	 
	Re:	Pricing Agreement	 







 


Dear James,


 


You will find enclosed the pricing agreement
duly executed by Cedric Bolloré.


 


Please return a copy to me once executed.


 


Best Regards,


 


Claude Parisot


General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21436]



[[Page 43535]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 97F-0336]


General Electric Co.; Filing of Food Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that 
General Electric Co. has filed a petition proposing that the food 
additive regulations be amended to change the intrinsic viscosity 
specifications for poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene) oxide resins 
intended for use in contact with food.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vir D. Anand, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-215), Food and Drug Administration, 200 C 
St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3081.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act (sec. 409(b)(5) (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5))), notice is given that a food 
additive petition (FAP 7B4551) has been filed by General Electric Co., 
One Lexan Lane, Mt. Vernon, IN 47620-9364. The petition proposes to 
amend the food additive regulations in Sec. 177.2460 Poly(2,6-dimethyl-
1,4-phenylene) oxide resins to change the intrinsic viscosity 
specifications for the poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene) oxide resins 
intended for use in contact with food from ``not less then 0.40 
deciliter per gram'' to ``not less than 0.30 deciliter per gram'' as 
determined by ASTM method D1243-79.
    The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.24(9) that this action is 
of the type that does not individually or cumulatively have a 
significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an 
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is 
required.

    Dated: July 31, 1997.
Alan M. Rulis,
Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety and 
Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 97-21436 Filed 8-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-KSB
ExperTelligence, Inc.
File No. 0-28453


          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of ExperTelligence, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended  September 30, 2005 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jason Smart, Chief
Executive and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: June 13, 2007              By:  /s/ Jason Smart
       ---------------                ----------------------------
                                        Jason Smart
                                        Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer







-------------------
A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to ExperTelligence,  Inc. and will be retained by ExperTelligence, Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on  Form 10-Q/A, Amendment No. 1of Global Earth Energy, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending May 31, 2010, I, Edmund J. Gorman, Chief Financial Officer of Global Earth Energy, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on  Form 10-Q/A, Amendment No. 1 for the fiscal quarter ending May 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on  Form 10-Q/A, Amendment No. 1 for the fiscal quarter ending May 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global Earth Energy, Inc.

Dated: July 30, 2010.

/s/ Edmund J. Gorman

Edmund J. Gorman, Chief Financial Officer and
    Principal Accounting Officer of Global Earth
    Energy, Inc.
Order entered October 8, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 01007
- CV
IN RE J.C. PENNEY CO MPANY INC., ET AL . , Relators Original Proceeding from the 193rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court C ause No. DC
- 12
- 00735 

### O RDER On July 31, 2013, this Court abated this proceeding for sixty days. As sixty days have passed, we REINSTATE this original proceeding. We ORDER that the parties file a status report regarding this proceeding within five days o f the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 160 (Tuesday, August 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21947]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3854-000]


NRG Generating (Parlin) Cogeneration Inc.; Notice of Filing

August 13, 1997.
    On July 24, 1997, NRG Generating (Parlin) Cogeneration Inc. (NRGG) 
submitted for filing the Agreement for Delivery of Electric Energy at 
an Additional Delivery Point between NRGG and Jersey Central Power & 
Light Company, a New Jersey corporation doing business as GPU Energy. 
NRGG requests waiver of the 60 day prior notice requirement.
    A copy of the filing has been mailed to GPU Energy.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions and protests should be filed on or before August 26, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any persons wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21947 Filed 8-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit
10.23


 


 


 


  


June
10, 1996


 





North Atlantic
Trading Company, Inc. 

c/o Drake, Goodwin & Graham

1301 Avenue of the Americas

7th Floor


New York,
New York 10019


 


Gentlemen:


 


Reference
is made to the three Amended and Restated Distribution and License Agreements (collectively, the “Agreements”) each
dated as of November 30, 1992 between us relating to the distribution of Zig Zag cigarette paper booklets in the United States,
in Canada and in Hong Kong and certain other territories, as amended by agreement dated March 31, 1993. This will confirm our
agreement to amend the Agreements further, as follows:


 


1.          The
third sentence of Section 3(b) of each of the Agreements is hereby amended by deleting the date “December 31,
1998” and substituting in lieu thereof the date “December 31, 2001.”


 


2.          The
first sentence of Section 3(c) of each of the Agreements is hereby amended by deleting the date “December 31,
1998” and substituting in lieu thereof the date “December 31, 2001.”


 


3.          The
first sentence of Section 3(d) of each of the Agreements is hereby amended by deleting the date “December 31,
1998” and substituting in lieu thereof the date “December 31, 2001.”


 


4.          Each
of us represents and warrants to the other that this amendment has been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action and
that any consents required by either party in connection with this amendment have been obtained by such party.


 


5.          Except
as modified by this amendment, the terms and provisions of each of the Agreements shall remain in full force and effect.


 









    	 



    	 



    

 


If
the foregoing accurately reflects our understanding, please countersign where indicated below. 





	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	BOLLORE TECHNOLOGIES S.A.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ 
	 	 	Name:
	 	 	Title:


  


	Agreed to:
	 
	NORTH ATLANTIC TRADING COMPANY, INC.
	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Mark R. Graham


	 
	 	Name: Mark R. Graham

 

	 	Title:


  



    	2
### Adams, Kevin 

## (OSn

Subject: Attachments: From: 

### Sent: To:

Cc:

Hi All, Adams, Kevin (OST) Tuesday, December 10,2013 S:29AM Dodge City, Airport Manager, Corey Keller; Dodge City, City Manager, Ken Strobel; Garden City, City Manager, Matt Allen; Garden City, Rachelle Powell; Great Send, Airport Manager, Martin Miller; Great Bend, City Administrator, Howard Partington; Great Bend, City Council, Ken Roberts; Chamber of Commerce, Tammy Wellbrok; Hays Public Works, !.D. Creech; Hays, City Manager, Toby Dougherty; Hays, Executive Director, Mike Michaelis; Hays, Mayor. City Commissioner, Dave Harrison; Liberal, Debbie Giskie, Airport Manager; Mark Hall (mark.hall@CityofLiberal.org) 'Mike Matthews'; 'Tim Sieber'; eas@seaportair.com; 'Rob McKinney'; 'Livsey, Will'; SkyWest, Brad Rawson Request for Comments at DDC, GCK,GBD, HYS,and LBL Eagle, GCK.pdf; Great Lakes, DDC, GBD, HYS,LBL.pdf; Great Lakes, Hays, Brasilia.pdf; Seaport, DDC,GBD,and LBL.pdf; SkyWest, Hays.pdf



### Attached above arethe timely-filed proposals forEssential Air Service (EAS) atDodge City, Garden City, Great Bend, Hays andLiberal, Kansas, submitted by Great Lakes, American, Seaport, and SkyWest, in response to Order 2013-11-2. We are currently reviewing those proposals. The attached proposals are directly from the carriers and will soon bereflected inthe Docket, which youmay access through 

# j Regulations.gov asfollows: 

# J DOCKET DOT-OST-1998-3502; DodgeCity DOCKET DOT-OST-1998-3503j Garden City,

~ DOCKET DOT-OST-1998-3496j Great Bend 

# ':JDOCKET DOT-OST-1998-3497; Hays,

. DOCKET DOT-OST-1998-3498; Liberal The Dockets will have other pertinent information aswell. The next step in the carrier-selection process isfor you to provide uswith your community's comments, acritically important element in our carrier-selection decision, especially the comments of civic officials. Accordingly, Iaskthat everyone get back to us, preferably by email, no later than January 13, 2014. We will docket this email, aswell asany replies. In brief, look at the proposals and get back to usbythe deadline, January 13, 2014. Obviously" ifyou have any questions, please call me. . Best,
Kevin Adams 202-366-1047

1