alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[106th Congress Private Law 9]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:pvtl009.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 3102]]

Private Law 106-9
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 For the private relief of Ruth Hairston by waiver of a filing deadline 
  for appeal from a ruling relating to her application for a survivor 
             annuity. <<NOTE: Nov. 9, 2000 -  [H.R. 660]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That for purposes of a 
petition by Mrs. Ruth Hairston for review of the final order issued 
October 31, 1995, by the Merit Systems Protection Board with respect to 
its docket number SF-0831-95-0754-I-1, the 30-day filing deadline in 
section 7703(b)(1) of title 5, United States Code, is waived.

    Approved November 9, 2000.
```
Before the Third Division,

May 5, 1943

No. 48257.

#### Protests 748004-G, etc., of Sun Wing Wo Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of medicinal preparations (not distilled spirits) of the same character as that the subject of *Wing Duck*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 133, C. D. 446). It was therefore held *not*subject to internal revenue tax.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Infinity  Capital Group,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report") I,
Theodore A. Greenberg,  Chief Financial  Officer,  Chief Investment  Officer and
Secretary  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 19, 2007



/s/Theodore A. Greenberg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Theodore A. Greenberg
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer and Secretary


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 21.1

                   Subsidiaries of RCG Companies Incorporated
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                          State of              Ownership
                                     Entity                                             Incorporation          Percentage
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------    --------------------    ----------------
<S>                                                                                       <C>                       <C>
Flightserv, Inc...............................................................            Delaware                  100
FS Tours, Inc.................................................................            Delaware                  100
FS SunTours, Inc..............................................................            Delaware                  100
DM Marketing, Inc.............................................................            Delaware                  100
Avenel Ventures, Inc..........................................................             Nevada                   100
Logisoft Corp.................................................................            New York                  100
eStorefronts.net Corp.........................................................            New York                  100
Premiere Shoe Group, LLC......................................................            New York                   75

Inactive companies:
PDK Properties, Inc...........................................................             Georgia                  100
Internet Aviation Services Limited, Ltd.......................................             Nevada                   100
Gateway Development Corp......................................................            New York                  100
Capital First Holdings, Inc. of Georgia.......................................             Georgia                  100
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1





                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this  registration  statement of
Medco Research, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-35675) of our report dated January
22,  1998,  on our  audit  of the  consolidated  financial  statements  of Medco
Research,  Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and for the year ended December 31, 1997
which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                         COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Raleigh, North Carolina
March 20, 1998
Letter Amendment - Gary Lauer



 Exhibit 10.9.1 
 November         , 2007 
 Gary L. Lauer 
 eHealthInsurance Services, Inc. 
 440 East Middlefield Road 
 Mountain View, CA 94043 
  

	 	RE:	Amendment to Offer Letter 

 Dear Gary: 
 This letter serves to modify the terms of your employment with eHealthInsurance Services, Inc. (the “Company”) and amends your Offer Letter dated
November 30, 1999 (the “Offer Letter”). Except as expressly provided in this letter agreement, all terms of your Offer Letter shall remain in full force and effect. 
 The following new Section 12 is hereby added to the Offer Letter: 
 12. Compliance with
Section 409A. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this letter agreement, if you are a “specified employee” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and any final
regulations and guidance promulgated thereunder (“Section 409A”) at the time of your termination, then only that portion of the severance payable pursuant to this agreement, if any, and any other severance payments or separation
benefits which may be considered deferred compensation under Section 409A (together, the “Deferred Compensation Separation Benefits”), which (when considered together) do not exceed the Section 409A Limit (as defined herein) may
be made within the first six (6) months following your termination of employment in accordance with the payment schedule applicable to each payment or benefit. Any portion of the Deferred Compensation Separation Benefits in excess of the
Section 409A Limit otherwise due to you on or within the six (6) month period following your termination will accrue during such six (6) month period and will become payable in a lump sum payment on the date six (6) months and
one (1) day following the date of your termination of employment. All subsequent Deferred Compensation Separation Benefits, if any, will be payable in accordance with the payment schedule applicable to each payment or benefit. It is the intent
of this letter agreement to comply with the requirements of Section 409A so that none of the severance payments and benefits to be provided hereunder will be subject to the additional tax imposed under Section 409A, and any ambiguities
herein will be interpreted to so comply. For purposes of this letter agreement, “Section 409A Limit” will mean the lesser of two (2) times: (i) your annualized compensation based upon the annual rate of pay paid to you during the
Company’s taxable year preceding the Company’s taxable year of your termination of employment as determined under Treasury Regulation 1.409A-1(b)(9)(iii)(A)(1) and any Internal Revenue Service guidance issued with respect thereto; or
(ii) the maximum amount that may be taken into account under a qualified plan pursuant to Section 401(a)(17) of the Code for the year in which your employment is terminated. 








	
	 Very truly yours,
  
 eHealthInsurance Services, Inc.

	
	  
	 Michael D. Goldberg
 Director



  

	
	AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
	
	  
	 Gary L. Lauer
 Chief Executive Officer and President



  

	
	
	  
	Date
Exhibit23(b)

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein Registration Statement Nos. 33-6300, 33-19372, 33-38928, 33-38925, 33-86726,333-14607, and 333-29949 of MFIC Corporation (the “Company”) on Forms S-8 ofour report dated March 29, 2001, except for Note 7, as to which the date isApril 13, 2001 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of MFIC Corporationfor the year ended December 31, 2001.

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

Boston, Massachusetts

March 29, 2002
Exhibit 32.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Jagged Peak, Inc. (the Company),
hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 26, 2010, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |                              
|----------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: May 6, 2010
|                  | 
|By:               |  | /s/ Andrew J. Norstrud       
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                  |  | (Principle Financial Officer)
Before the Second Division,

October 24, 1941

No. 46496.

#### Protest 793-K of Hilborn Hamburger, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with the agreed facts that certain of the merchandise is similar to that the subject of *Meyer*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 191, C. D. 459) the trimmings in question were held dutiable as woven fabrics wholly or in chief value of any of the materials provided for in paragraph 385 at 40 percent as claimed.
EXHIBIT 31.2
  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Roger N. Wurtele, certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Energy & Engine Technology Corporation, for the quarter ended June 30, 2004; 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 
 Date:
November 15, 2004
By /s/ Roger N. WurteleRoger N. WurteleChief Financial Officer
1



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMI NAL AP PEALS OF TENNES SEE

AT NAS HVILLE

PERCY LEE PA LME R v. STA TE OF TEN NES SEE

Appeal f rom the Circ uit Court for Rutherford Coun ty No. F -57466 Don R. Ash, Judge

No. M2006- 01673-CCA -R3-P C - F iled Janu ary 31, 2007

Th e Ap pe lla nt, Pe rc y

L e e Pa lme r, a pp e a ls t he tr ia l co urt 's dis mis sa l of his pe tit ion fo r p os tc on vic tio n r e lie f. Ap pe lla nt c on c e de s o n a pp e a l t hat th e tr ia l c ou rt ' s ju dg me nt i s c or re c t. Acc ording ly , the j udg ment of t he trial court is aff irmed pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Cr imi na l A pp e a ls.

Tenn. R. App . P . 3; Judgme nt of th e Trial Court Affirm ed P ursuan t to Rule 20, Rules of th e Co ur t o f Cr im ina l A ppe als

T H O M A S T. W O O D A LL , J ., delivere d the opinion of the cour t, in which J ER R Y L. S MI TH , J.
, a nd R OB E R T W. W EDEMEYER , J ., joined.

J ohn H. B aker , I I I , for the a ppellant, Perc y

L ee Palmer

.

Rob e rt E. Coo pe r, Jr., At tor ne y

Ge ne ra l & Re po rt e r; Ra c he l E . Wil lis , A ssi sta nt A tto rn e y Ge ne ra l, for the a ppellee, State of

Tenne ssee.

M EM OR AN DU M OP IN ION

Th e Ap pe lla nt t ime ly fi le d a pet iti on fo r pos t- c on vic tio n re lie f ch a lle ng ing the va lid ity of his
g uilty p le a s to th r e e c o u n ts o f f ir s t d e g r e e mu r d e r

. T h e tr ia l c o u r t a p p o in te d c o unsel, who subsequently filed an amende d petition. At the hear ing on the petition, the Appellant, ag ain s t the advice of counse l, declined to testify or pre sent any

proof. Finding that Appellant fa iled to prove the alleg ations by

clea r and c onvincing evidenc e, see T en n . Code Ann. § 40-30- 110(f) , the trial cour t dismiss ed the pe tition.

I n h is br ief

on a pp e a l, t he Ap pe lla nt a c kn ow le dg e s th a t th e tr ia l c ou rt ' s d ism iss a l of his petition is supported by

the re cord and the law. The Appellant states that he appe als the dismissal2

so that the issues rai sed in the petition may be pre serve d for subseque nt fede ral ha beas c orpus or oth e r c oll a tera l r e vie w. I n r e sp on se to t he Ap pe lla nt' s b ri e f, the Sta te fi le d a mot ion to d ism iss

. Acc ording to the State, the appea l should be dismiss ed beca use the Appe llant seeks no re lief fr om thi s Co ur t.

Th e Cou rt

ha s r e vie we d th e re c or d o n a pp e a l. I n li e u o f g rant in g t he Sta te ' s mo tio n to dismiss
, and in light of the Appellant's concessions on appe al, the Court her eby aff irms the judgme nt of the tr ia l c ou rt

in a c c or da nc e wi th R ule 20 , Ru le s o f t he Cou rt of Cr imi na l A pp e a ls.



### ____________________________________ THOMAS T. W OODALL, JUDGE
This page was intentionally left blank. 





This page was intentionally left blank. 

This page was intentionally left blank. 



This page was intentionally left blank. 











This page was intentionally left blank. 



This page was intentionally left blank. 

This page was intentionally left blank. 

This page was intentionally left blank.
---

---

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

## FORM 8-K

#### CURRENT REPORT

#### PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event
reported): October 31, 2006

SOMERSET HILLS BANCORP
(Exact name of
registrant as specified in its charter)

|                                                         |                                   |                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------
|New Jersey(State or other
jurisdiction of incorporation) | 000-50055(Commission File
Number) | 22-3768777(IRS Employer 
Identification No.)

|                                                                                     |  |                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------
|155 Morristown Road Bernardsville,
New Jersey(Address of principal executiveoffices) |  | 07924(Zip Code)

(Registrant's telephone
number, including area code) (908) 221-0100



---

---

---

Item 7.01  Regulation FD
Disclosure

On
November 1, the Registrant will give a presentation to brokers and members of the
financial community. The Registrant is filing a copy of that presentation as Exhibit 99.1
hereto.

Item 9.01.  Financial Statements and
Exhibits.

| | (d) | Exhibits.
| | --- | ---------

| |                |                                                               
| | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------
| | Exhibit Number | Description                                                   
| | 99.1           | Presentation to the Financial Community dated November 1, 2006



---

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

|                       |                                                                                                         
|---------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 31, 2006 | SOMERSET HILLS BANCORPBy: /s/Gerard RikerGERARD RIKERExecutive Vice Presidentand Chief
Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          89,739
<SECURITIES>                                    36,800
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               232,137
<PP&E>                                         430,041
<DEPRECIATION>                                 402,033
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 514,453
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          790,991
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     15,500
<COMMON>                                       162,140
<OTHER-SE>                                    (454,178)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   514,543
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  784,637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (672,475)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (672,475)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (672,475)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    ($.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    ($.04)
        






</TABLE>
No. 00-6726.

#### Williams *v.*Pennsylvania.

Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D2022

- 4061

_____________________________
W ALTON C ONSTRUCTION S ERVICES and S UMMIT , Appellant s ,

v.

S HAWN H OLLOWAY , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims. John P. Moneyham , Judge

. Date of Accident: March 9, 2016

.

March 13, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
B.L. T HOMAS , R AY , and K ELSEY , JJ.
, concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

H. George Kagan of H. George Kagan, P.A., Gulf Stream
, for Appellant s

.
Charles F. Beall Jr. of Moore, Hill & Westmoreland, P.A., Pensacola
, for Appellee.
#### WALKER v. FOLSOM et al.

June 1, 1837.

*Rule on the sheriff to show cause why he should not furnish a boMpiece.*

Under the act of June 13, 1836, relating to the commencement of actions, it is the duty of the prolhonotary, and not of the sheriff, to furnish a bailpiece to the bail when demanded.

THIS was *capias*in debt 300 dollars; bail 600 dollars, ret. 1st Monday, March 1839 : ex’t. 25th Feb. *Eo. die*defendant Folsom arrested, and O. M. Lawrnls became his bail, by entering into a bail bond of that date to the sheriff, in the usual form.

*103On the return day, the sheriff returned as to Folsom, “ C. 0. & B. B.,” and at the same time returned the bond, together with the *capias ad respondendum,*to the office of the prothonotary of this court, who filed the same.

The bail was not excepted to.

Upon application to the sheriff, in April, 1839, he declined giving to the bail a bailpiece, and *J. M. Read*obtained this rule on the sheriff to show cause why he should not furnish the bailpiece.

*J. M. Read,*for the rule,

cited the act of 13th June, 1836, *(Purd. Dig.*41,) 1 *Dunl. P.*161; 2 *Strange*870; 4 *W. C. C. R.*233.

*Tyson,*contra.

The Court

said it was the duty of the prothonotary to give the bailpiece. The act of June 13, 1836, makes no alteration in the previous practice.

Rule discharged.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Turkey[electronic resource].**
 
2002
March
September
2003
March
October
2004
March
September
2005
June
2007
May
November
2008
May
November
2009
May
December
 
SuDoc Number:ID 1.29:T 84/
Item Number:0900-I-20 (online)
CGP system Number:000632522
 
June 19, 2018