alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.7
 AMENDMENT
To The
Hudson Valley Bank
Supplemental Retirement Plan
 THIS AMENDMENT TO THE HUDSON VALLEY BANK SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE
 The following definitions if specifically identified in the original Plan are hereby replaced in
their entirety, and if not found in the original Plan are hereby added:
 The following Definitions are hereby amended:
  The following Definitions are hereby added to the Plan:
   The following Articles are hereby amended and shall read as follows:




---



##### 



IN WITNESS OF THE ABOVE
 WITNESS:
    
    
    
    FOR THE PLAN SPONSOR:Hudson Valley Bank, N.A.By:Its:Reviewed and Approved by:Hudson Valley Bank, N.A.Compensation CommitteeBy:Its:THE PARTICIPANT:Individually
Exhibit 32.1


  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Big Sky Industries I,
Inc. (the  "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Ramon
Chimelis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


    Date: August 20, 2007                           /s/Ramon Chimelis
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Ramon Chimelis
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
|  |
|--|
|  |
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21203]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. FA96-12-001]

Yankee Atomic Electric Company; Notice of Filing

August 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on April 8, 1997, Yankee Atomic Electric Company 
tendered for filing its refund report in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426 in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before August 15, 1997. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21203 Filed 8-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
#### Willie E. BURGESS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-863.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 13, 1977.

Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, and Greg A. Johnson, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Willie E. Burgess, pro se.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

After jury trial appellant was found guilty of having committed the offenses of involuntary sexual battery, attempted robbery, and assault with intent to commit murder in the first degree. He was sentenced to a single general life sentence with credit for time served in jail awaiting trial.

The points relied upon by appellant for reversal have been carefully considered in the light of the record and briefs, and we hold no reversible error has been made to appear. It is necessary, however, for the case to be remanded to the trial court for correction of appellant’s sentence. It is apparent from our reading of the colloquy of the sentencing hearing that the trial court intended to impose maximum concurrent sentences on the charged offenses which, we submit, would have been proper. The offenses do not fall within the single transaction rule. The judgment and sentence rendered in this case shows that the trial court did not carry out his expressed intention and, as mentioned before, imposed a general sentence, which is improper. *Darden v. State,*306 So.2d 581 (Fla.2d DCA 1975). *See also Darden v. State,*330 So.2d 750 (Fla.2d DCA 1976).

Therefore, the convictions are affirmed, but the general life sentence is vacated. The case is remanded for resentencing in order that the judgment and sentence may reflect the imposition of sentence announced by the trial court in open court. It is not necessary that appellant be present in court for this purpose.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Global Earth Energy, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending May 31, 2011, I, Sydney A. Harland, Chief Executive Officer of Global Earth Energy, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending May 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending May 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global Earth Energy, Inc.

Dated: July 20, 2011.

/s/ Sydney A. Harland

Sydney A. Harland, Chief Executive Officer of

Global Earth Energy, Inc.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1228 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to modify the computation 

of eligibility for certain Federal Pell Grants, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 13, 2005 

Ms. CANTWELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to modify 

the computation of eligibility for certain Federal Pell 

Grants, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Pell Grant 

5 Eligibility Clarification Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONSIDERATION OF CURRENT YEAR CIR7 CUMSTANCES. 

8 Section 480(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

9 (20 U.S.C. 1087vv(a)) is amended— 
2 

•S 1228 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘paragraph 

2 (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (2) and (3)’’; and 

3 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(3) CONSIDERATION OF CURRENT YEAR CIR5 CUMSTANCES FOR CERTAIN PELL GRANT AWARDS.— 

6 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—If a student is a resi7 dent of a State that is in an extended benefit 

8 period (as determined under subparagraph (C)), 

9 then for purposes of calculating total income 

10 under paragraph (1) for a student seeking as11 sistance under subpart 1 of part A, the Sec12 retary shall reduce the student’s total income 

13 by an amount by which— 

14 ‘‘(i) the adjusted gross income plus 

15 untaxed income and benefits for the pre16 ceding tax year minus excludable income 

17 (as defined in subsection (e)), exceeds 

18 ‘‘(ii) the projected gross income plus 

19 untaxed income and benefits for the cur20 rent tax year minus the projected exclud21 able income (as defined in subsection (e)). 

22 ‘‘(B) ANTI-FRAUD PROCEDURES.—The 

23 Secretary shall establish procedures to ensure 

24 that computations made pursuant to subpara25 graph (A) are not fraudulent. 
3 

•S 1228 IS

1 ‘‘(C) EXTENDED BENEFIT PERIOD.—For 

2 purposes of subparagraph (A), a State shall be 

3 considered to be in an extended benefit period 

4 if— 

5 ‘‘(i) such a period is then in effect for 

6 such State under the Federal-State Ex7 tended Unemployment Compensation Act 

8 of 1970; or 

9 ‘‘(ii) such a period would then be in 

10 effect for such State under such Act if sec11 tion 203(d) of such Act were applied as if 

12 it had been amended by striking ‘5’ each 

13 place it appears and inserting ‘4’.’’. 

Æ
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries IV, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 2, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries IV, Inc.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23(a)

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the below scheduled Form S-8
registration statements of our report dated January 16, 1997, and appearing on
page 60 of the Annual Report to Shareholders, on the consolidated financial
statements of CNB Bancshares, Inc. incorporated by reference in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.


                                                               Commission
                                                                     File
                                                                   Number
                                                               ----------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                            <C>

Indiana Bancshares, Inc. 1985 Non-Qualified
  Stock Option Plan and Indiana Bancshares, Inc.
  1990 Stock Option Plan                                       33-47898

CNB Bancshares, Inc. 1992 Incentive Stock Option Plan          33-45929

Citizens Incentive Savings Plan                                33-41514

Valley Bank Stock Option Plan                                  33-38651

King City Federal Savings Bank 1986 Stock Option and
  Incentive Plan                                               33-89658

King City Federal Savings Bank 1993 Stock Option and
  Incentive Plan                                               33-89722

UF Bancorp, Inc. 1991 Stock Option and Incentive Plan          33-61685

CNB Bancshares, Inc. 1995 Stock Incentive Plan                 33-60431

</TABLE>

/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick, LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
March 27, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial Statements of AMC Entertainment Inc. as of and for the
fifty-two weeks ended April 1, 1999 submitted in response to the requirements to
Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-1999
<CASH>                                          13,239
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,182
<ALLOWANCES>                                       540
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,588
<PP&E>                                       1,118,978
<DEPRECIATION>                                 392,953
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 975,730
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          189,056
<BONDS>                                        591,603
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,965
<OTHER-SE>                                     115,465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   975,730
<SALES>                                        307,347
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,026,721
<CGS>                                           48,687
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  865,771
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                89,221
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,628
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,516)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (10,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,016)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,016)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.69)


</TABLE>
No. 9529.

#### Rank *v.*Evans.

(Decided May 15, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Licking county.

*Messrs. Hunter <& Hunter*and *Messrs. Smythe $ Smythe,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Flory & Flory*and *Mr. G. C. Daugherty,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and-Davis, JJ., concur.
#### In re THE FLORIDA BAR. In re RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.

No. 49249-B.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 14, 1977.

PER CURIAM.

In connection with proposed Rules of Medical Mediation Procedure submitted by the Civil Procedure Rules Committee, it was recommended that certain amendments be made to the discovery provisions of the Rules of Civil Procedure. After due consideration the recommendation of the Civil Procedure Rules Committee is adopted and, accordingly, Rule 1.330(a) and Rule 1.340, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure are hereby amended as follows:

RULE 1.330(a) is amended to add subsection (6) which reads as follows:

> “(6) If a civil action is afterward brought, all depositions lawfully taken in a medical liability mediation proceeding may be used in the civil action as if originally taken for it.”

RULE 1.340 is amended by adding á subsection (f) which reads as follows:

> “(f) USE OF ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES PROPOUNDED IN MEDICAL LIABILITY MEDIATION *326PROCEEDINGS. If a civil action is afterward brought, answers to interrogatories propounded in a medical liability mediation proceeding may be used in the civil action as if originally propounded in it.”

The foregoing amendments shall govern all proceedings within their scope after 12:01 a. m., September 1, 1977. From and after their effective date, all rules and statutes in conflict with such amendments are hereby superseded, and any statute not superseded shall remain in effect as a rule promulgated by the Supreme Court.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG and HATCH-ETT, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

Certification of Treasurer



I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Big Sky Industries II, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: December 29, 2008



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer
#### In the Matter of Jessica R., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[699 NYS2d 46]

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York- County (Sara Schechter, J.), entered on or about September 19, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determina*5tion that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and placed her with the New York Foundling Mother-Child Residence for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Appellant’s intent to aid in the sale of drugs was amply established. She received the drug sale proceeds during the transaction. She remained beside the undercover officer after her companion directed the officer to wait with appellant while he retrieved the drugs, and she still possessed the proceeds when she was arrested. The evidence did not support an innocent explanation for appellant’s conduct (see, *People v Williams,*172 AD2d 448, *affd*79 NY2d 803). Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Mazzarelli and Friedman, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries II, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: January 14, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries II, Inc.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Annual Report of Electronic Clearing House, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joel M.
      Barry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Joel
      M. Barry





Joel
      M.
      Barry


Chief
      Executive Officer


December
      14, 2006
#### Carrell KILLEBREW v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES.

No. 61338.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1978.

In re: Carrell Killebrew applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 352 So.2d 332.

*206Writ granted. It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
ARS HomeNutrition, Food Safety/QualityFood Safety (animal and plant products)Research

----

Program Team
- James Lindsay, Co- Lead
- Kim Cook, Co-Lead
2022 Research Highlights
- Combating AMR
- Monitoring and Mitigating the Spread of Plant Disease
- Protecting Human and Animal Health
- Safeguarding Food Supply
Program Input
- Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR)
Program Planning
-                 Action Plans             
-                 Strategic Vision             
Program Reports
-                 Annual Reports             
-                 Accomplishment Report             
Project Information
- List of Projects in this Program
- List of Project Annual Reports in this program

**Listed below are the Annual Reports for currently active projects directly assigned to this National Program.**
#### Ex parte George Randall SEXTON.

SC 2606.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 24, 1977.

FAULKNER, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ„ concur.