alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

      I, Gerard G. Gorman, Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of
Immunomedics, Inc., certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report of Immunomedics, Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

<PAGE>

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

      Date: September 9, 2004


      /s/ GERARD G. GORMAN
      --------------------------------------------------
      Gerard G. Gorman
      Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer


                                        2
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, David R. DeYoung, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of 1mage Software, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying
officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 29, 2004

/s/ DAVID R. DEYOUNG
------------------------
David R. DeYoung
President, Principal and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-93,433-01 & 93,433-02

EX PARTE LEONARDO H PEREIRA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1461485-A & 1430258-A IN THE 338TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. On the same day,

Applicant was also convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child and sentenced to five years’

imprisonment. Applicant did not appeal his convictions. Applicant filed these applications for writs

of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded them to this Court. See

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. 

On August 4, 2021, the trial court entered an order designating issues in both habeas cases. 

The district clerk properly forwarded these applications to this Court under Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 73.4(b)(5). However, the applicationswere forwarded before the trial court made findings

of fact and conclusions of law. We remand these applications to the trial court to complete its
evidentiary investigation and make findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 

Filed: February 9, 2022

Do not publish
#### STATE of Louisiana v. John CRITTLE.

No. 61030.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 16, 1977.

In re: John Crittle applying for writs of certiorari, review, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ denied. There is no adequate showing of reason to recuse the District Attorney at this time.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6077
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROSALEE J. EVANS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-90-60) Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 1, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rosalee J. Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying her motion to require the United States Parole Commission to grant her a particular parole date or a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Evans , No. CR-90-60 (E.D. Va. Dec. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov> 

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Bridgid Curry/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>, Joseph-J Doug

Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 01/22/2010 10:49 PM 

Subject: RE: Further thoughts on econ signif issue 

Could EPA share the memo that documents edits prior to publication, just 

so that I can demonstrate this isn't going to print with that 

designation? 

-----Original Message----- 

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:46 PM 

To: King, Heidi R. 

Cc: Curry.Bridgid@epamail.epa.gov; Mancini, Dominic J.; 

Dougherty.Joseph-J@epamail.epa.gov; Montoro.Marta@epamail.epa.gov; 

Jenkins.Scott@epamail.epa.gov; Crabtree.Tricia@epamail.epa.gov 

Subject: Further thoughts on econ signif issue 

I think we should leave it as it is because I'm not honestly sure and I 

don't think I can reach Ron now. I don't think it hurts us to leave it 

as it is, do you? 

 

 From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov> 

 

 To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Mancini, Dominic J." 

 <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov> 

 

 Cc: Bridgid Curry/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Marta 

Montoro/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph-J 

 Dougherty/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Scott Jenkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Tricia 

 Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

 Date: 01/22/2010 10:36 PM 

 

 Subject: RE: Updated version of the NO2 final notice 

 
Lydia, does EPA want to retain "economically significant" designation in 

Section VIII? As strange as it seems to say this about a NAAQS, I don't 

believe this rule meets the definition. 

h 

-----Original Message----- 

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:33 PM 

To: King, Heidi R.; Mancini, Dominic J. 

Cc: Curry.Bridgid@epamail.epa.gov; Montoro.Marta@epamail.epa.gov; 

Dougherty.Joseph-J@epamail.epa.gov; Jenkins.Scott@epamail.epa.gov; 

Crabtree.Tricia@epamail.epa.gov 

Subject: Fw: Updated version of the NO2 final notice 

Here's the track changes version. 

(See attached file: NO2 primary NAAQS-final (1-22-2010 track 

changes).doc.docx)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          63,658
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  346,802
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,664
<INVENTORY>                                    431,816
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               850,965
<PP&E>                                          71,915
<DEPRECIATION>                                (19,935)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 941,206
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          616,322
<BONDS>                                         99,766
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,316
<OTHER-SE>                                     218,772
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   941,206
<SALES>                                      5,317,526
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,318,933
<CGS>                                        5,197,008
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,288,062
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,543
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,992
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,871
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,865
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,006
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,006
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.35
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, OC Kim, Acting Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Franklin Wireless Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

         a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls.


Date:  September 20, 2006           /s/ OC Kim
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    OC Kim, Acting Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21111]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-187-006]


Arkansas Western Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

August 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 30, 1997, Arkansas Western Pipeline 
Company (AWP) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with an effective 
date of June 1, 1997:

Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 7
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 11
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 26
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 29
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 33

    AWP states that the tariff sheets are being filed in compliance 
with the Commission's July 15, 1997 letter order.
    AWP states that a copy of the filing is being mailed to each of 
AWP's customers and the affected state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the public reference room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21111 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1 - SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Absolute Glass Protection, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").
I, John Dean Harper, Chairman and President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.


/s/ John Dean Harper
--------------------------
    John Dean Harper
    Chairman and President


Date  August 19, 2004
      ---------------



<PAGE>
<PAGE>



                                   EXHIBIT 21


                         LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF BANCORP


Direct Subsidiary:  LA Bank, National  Association,  chartered under the laws of
     the United States of America, a national banking association.

Indirect  Subsidiaries:  -LA  Lease,  Inc.,  incorporated  under the laws of the
     Commonwealth  of  Pennsylvania,  a Pennsylvania  business  corporation  and
     wholly-owned subsidiary of LA Bank, National Association.

                    -Ariel Financial Services, Inc., incorporated under the laws
               of the  Commonwealth  of  Pennsylvania,  a Pennsylvania  business
               corporation  and  wholly-owned  subsidiary  of LA Bank,  National
               Association.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2391 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2391

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on bitolylene diisocyanate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mrs. Shaheen introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on bitolylene diisocyanate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BITOLYLENE DIISOCYANATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.01 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to bitolylene diisocyanate) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### 8 Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- Directorate Identifier:

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the tab le below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircra ft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

cost

(@$85/h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Inspect/Modify

Fuselage

Circumf erential

Skin and Stringer

Splice at FS 695. 18.0 $ 1,530.0

0 

### $5,000 $ 6,530.00 

### 4 $ 26,120.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 26,120



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product



### Repair (unknown) $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

### 9

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

th at was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### : 

### Man

- hours and

materials required to accomplish necessary repairs found during inspections per the AD will be

dependent upon extent of damage and t ype of repair required.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviati on in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :