alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RHODE ISLAND 

DEPARTMENT OF E l'\VIRONMENTAL M ANAGEMENT 

235 Promenade Street, Providence, RI 02908-5767 TDD 401-222-4462 

18 January 2011 

David Conroy 

EPA- New England, Region T 

5 Post Office Square 

Mail Code OEP05-2 

B.oston, MA 02109-3912 

Dear Mr. Conroy: 

The Department of Environmental Management, Office of Air Resources (OAR) is hereby 

submitting amended Rhode Island Air Pollution Control Regulation Nos. 9, 28 and 29 as formal 

revisions to the Rhode Island State Implementation Plan (SIP). 

The principal amendments to APC Regulation No.9, entitled "Air Pollution Control Permits" 

and APC Regulation No. 29, entitled "Operating Permits", are to adopt the provisions of 

USEPA's Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule into state regulations. 

Additionally, OAR has made certain technical revisions to APC Regulation No. 9 and APC 

Regulation No. 28, entitled "Operating Permit Fees". The technical revisions to APC Regulation 

No. 9 include COITecting the Minimum Quantity for toluene and xylene in Appendix A to be 

consistent with the Minimum Quantity for toluene and xylene in APC Regulation No. 22, entitled 

"Air Toxics". The technical revisions to APC Regulation No. 28 ensure consistent usc of the 

term "regulated air pollutant" throughout the regulation. 

On 12 November 2010 a notice was posted on the websites of the Rhode Island Department of 

Environmental Management and the Rhode Island Office of Secretary of State and was mailed to 

interested parties announcing a public comment period to accept comments on the adoption of 

proposed revisions to Air Pollution Control Regulation Nos. 9, 28 and 29. The notice stated that 

a public hearing would be held if requested by twenty five or more people, a governmental 

agency or subdivisions, or an association having not less than twenty five members. No requests 

for a public hearing were received. The public comment period extended until4:00 PM on 13 

December 2010. 

The following support documents arc included in this submittal package: 

I. A copy of the Notice of Public Comment Period. 

-() 30% post-consumer fiber 
2. A copy of an Affidavit of Publication/Posting for the no6ce. 

3. A list of the persons that were e-mailed or mailed a copy of the notice. 

4. A copy of the Decision, including responses to the written comments received; and 

5. A copy of the amended regulations as filed with the RJ Secretary of State, including any 

revisions noted in the Decision; 

If you have any questions about this submittal, please contact me at (401) 222-2808 ext. 7011. 

Very truly yours, 

??:t:~ Office of Air Resources icf
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4371-4372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2182]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Office of the Secretary
[Public Notice 2506]


Extension of the Restriction on the Use of United States 
Passports for Travel to, in or Through Lebanon

    On January 26, 1987, pursuant to the authority of 22 U.S.C. 211a 
and Executive Order 11295 (31 FR 10603), and in accordance with 22 CFR 
51.73(a)(3), all United States passports, with the exception of 
passports of immediate family members of hostages in Lebanon, were 
declared invalid for travel to, in or through Lebanon unless 
specifically validated for such travel. This action was taken because 
the situation in Lebanon was such that American citizens there could 
not be considered safe from terrorist acts, and has since been 
periodically renewed.
    Although security conditions in Lebanon continue to improve, the 
situation there has led me to conclude that Lebanon remains an area ``. 
. . where there is imminent danger to the public health or the physical 
safety of United States travelers'' within the meaning of 22 U.S.C. 
211a and 22 CFR 51.73(a)(3).
    Accordingly, all United States passports shall remain invalid for 
travel to, in, or through Lebanon unless specifically validated for 
such travel under the authority of the Secretary of State.
    This Public Notice shall be effective upon publication in the 
Federal Register and shall expire at midnight July 31, 1997, unless 
extended or sooner revoked by Public Notice. Upon publication, this 
Public Notice shall supersede Public Notice 2429, published August 22, 
1996 (61 FR 43395).


[[Page 4372]]


    Dated: January 15, 1997.
Warren Christopher,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 97-2182 Filed 1-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7391
MICHAEL F. DEHONEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; PARKER EVATT, Commissioner; CHARLES J. CEPAK, Warden; PRIS MACK, Deputy Warden individually and/or in their official capacities, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-1902-4-21BE) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 6, 1997 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael F. Dehoney, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Crouch Coleman, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and denying his motion toamend the court's order. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dehoney v. South Carolina Dep't of Corrections , No. CA-94-1902-4-21BE (D.S.C. Aug. 2, 1996; Aug. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
BB

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0506

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

EDWARD JEFFREY ALLEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including November 24, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

October 17 2023

10/17/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0506
<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 99.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of TNR TECHNICAL, INC. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending JULY 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, WAYNE THAW, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date:  October 10, 2003              /s/ Wayne Thaw
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Wayne Thaw, Chief Executive Officer
                                     And Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21318]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3124-000]


United Illuminating Company; Notice of Filing

August 7, 1997.
    On July 11, 1997, United Illuminating Company tendered for filing a 
Certificate of Concurrence in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before August 18, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21318 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-12-00019- CR
Ex parte Roxana Vanessa Rodriguez- Gr im aldo

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F B ASTROP CO UNTY, 21ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 12,7 61- A H ONO RAB LE TERRY L. F LENNIK EN, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N P ER CURIAM

Relator Rox ana Vane ssa Rodrigue z-Grimaldo’s brief was due Marc h 7, 2012. The Court sent notice to rela tor’s counsel that the brief was overdue and reque sted a response by J une 11, 2012. The brief has not been filed and rela tor’s reta ined counsel, Pascual Madrig al, did not respond to this C ourt’s notice tha t the brief is ove rdue.

The appeal is abate d. The trial court shall conduct a hear ing to deter mine whether Rodrigue z-Grimald o d esires to prosec ute this appea l, whether she is indige nt, and whether her reta ined counsel has abandone d this a ppeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)( 2). The court shall make appropr iate finding s and rec ommendations. See id. A rec ord from this hear ing, including copies of all finding s and order s and a transcr iption of the court repor t er ’s n o t es , shall be forwa rded to the cler k of this Court for filing as a supplemental rec ord n o later than October 3, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3)
.Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Rose and Goodw in

Abated Filed: Aug ust 29, 2012 Do Not Publish

2
No. 00-6975.

#### Antonio Lomas *v.*Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The   undersigned   executive   officer  of  WVS  Financial   Corp.   (the
"Registrant")  hereby certifies that the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained
therein fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.

                                            /s/ David J. Bursic
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David J. Bursic
                                            President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer

Date: September 24, 2007

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial Corp. and will be
      retained by WVS Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.01


SECRETARY'S  CERTIFICATE


The undersigned, the duly elected Assistant Secretary of State Auto Financial Corporation , hereby certifies that the attached is a true, accurate and complete executed copy of the Fourth Amendment to the State Auto Financial Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan approved by the STFC Compensation Committee at its meeting on November 6, 2014 and signed by an officer of the Company on November  11, 2014.


Dated:  November 14, 2014


	
	
	/s/ Susan Bowron-White

	Susan Bowron-White, Assistant Secretary













































































FOURTH  AMENDMENT TO THE
STATE AUTO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN




Background Information


		
	A.
	State Auto Financial Corporation ("STFC") previously adopted and maintains the State Auto Financial Corporation Long Tenn Incentive Plan (the "Plan") for the benefit of its executive officers and other key management employees, managers and professionals.




		
	B.
	STFC desires to amend the Plan to modify the Plan's definition of retirement.




		
	C.
	STFC also desires to amend the timing of payments of performance award units to participants who are subject to mandatory retirement at age 65 upon retirement.




		
	D.
	Article 9 of the Plan permits the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of STFC to amend the Plan.




Amendment of the Plan
The Plan is hereby amended effective August 8, 2014 as follows:
		
	1.
	New second and third paragraphs are hereby added to Section 6.2 of the Plan to read as follows:




"Notwithstanding the foregoing, effective for terminations due to retirement on or after August 8, 2014, "retirement" shall mean the attainment of age 55 plus the completion of five years of service  with State Auto; provided, however, that if a Participant's employment is terminated for cause after such Participant has satisfied the requirements for "retirement", such termination of employment shall not be an eligible "retirement" under the Plan. For this purpose, a "year of service" and "for cause" shall be determined in the absolute discretion of the Committee, whose decision shall be final and binding on all parties . Such revised definition of "retirement" shall apply to all current, future and outstanding Awards under the Plan.
In addition, with regard to Participants who are subject to mandatory retirement at age 65, where permitted by law  and  the regulations under Section 1625.12 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, the Final Award, if any, shall be based upon the actual performance results at the end of the Performance Period and shall not be prorated based upon the length of time that the Participant was employed by the Company during the Performance Period. Such revised determination of the Final Award, if any, for such Participants shall apply to all current, future and outstanding Awards under the Plan."
		
	2.
	All other provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.




	
	
	STATE AUTO FINANCIAL CORPORATION

	 

	By: Jay Yano

	Its: Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel

	Date: November 11, 2014
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 142 

For the relief of Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2005 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

6 1101 et seq.), Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical shall be held 

7 and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the 

8 United States for permanent residence as of the date of 

9 enactment of this Act upon payment of the required visa 

10 fees. 
2 

•S 142 IS 

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS. 

2 Upon the granting of permanent residence to 

3 Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical, the Secretary of State 

4 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 

5 current fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas 

6 available to natives of the country of the alien’s birth 

7 under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)). 

Æ
#### Lana MELLOR and Robert W. Mellor, her husband, Petitioners, v. Jean A. ARAKGUI, M. D. and Robert E. Lockwood, Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Broward County, Florida, Respondents.

No. 78-215.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 31, 1978.

Linda Koenigsberg of Cohen & Kokus, Miami, for petitioners.

Steven R. Berger of Carey, Dwyer, Cole, Selwood & Bernard, P. A., Miami, for respondents.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

By their Petition for Writ of Mandamus, Petitioners request that the Clerk of the Broward Circuit Court be ordered to issue a court certificate terminating the jurisdiction of medical mediation panel.

No hearing was commenced within six months’ from the date Petitioners’ claim for medical mediation was filed. As we held in *Green v. Broward General Medical Center,*356 So.2d 877 (Fla. 4 DCA, Opinion issued March 21, 1978), the jurisdiction of a medical mediation panel terminates if no hearing is held within six months from the date the claim was filed. Petitioners are now entitled to pursue their cause of action in the circuit court without further delay.

The Petition for Writ of Mandamus is granted and the Clerk of the Broward Circuit Court is hereby ordered to issue a court *37certificate terminating jurisdiction of the medical mediation panel.

ANSTEAD and MOORE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries III, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: January 20, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries III, Inc.
#### David Joseph HINES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 76-634, 76-635.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 15, 1977.

*1236Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, Bar-tow, and Douglas A. Wallace, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and C. Marie King, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court revoked appellant’s probation. Appellant was given a general sentence of from six months to five years in prison with credit for time previously served in Case No. 75-143 (Appeal No. 76-635). This sentence was imposed for convictions of (1) breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony, (2) possession of burglary tools, and (3) contributing to the delinquency of a minor. In addition, the trial judge imposed a like sentence for breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor in Case No. 75-243 (Appeal No. 76-634). Sentences in the two cases were to run concurrently.

Finding no merit in the points raised by appellant in his appeal from revocation of probation, we affirm the convictions. The sentence imposed in Case No. 75-143 (Appeal No. 76-635) was, however, an impermissible general sentence. We, therefore, remand for resentencing Case No. 75-143 in accordance with *Darden v. State,*306 So.2d 581 (Fla.2d DCA 1975). The sentence imposed must be apportioned among the convictions, *Maxwell v. State,*336 So.2d 658 (Fla.2d DCA 1976).

McNULTY, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4277-4278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2116]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-366-003]


Florida Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

January 23, 1997.
    Take notice that on January 21, 1997, Florida Gas Transmission 
Company (FGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third 
Revised Volume No. 1 the following tariff sheet to become effective 
April 1, 1997:

Second Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 163F

    FGT states that on December 10, 1996 FGT filed a Stipulation and 
Agreement of Settlement and Request for Waiver (Settlement) which 
resolved certain

[[Page 4278]]

tariff issues which were set for a technical conference by Commission 
order issued September 30, 1996 in Docket No. RP96-366-000. The 
Settlement provided for certain changes to the operating provisions in 
FGT's currently effective tariff and modified or withdrew tariff 
changes originally proposed by FGT's August 30, 1996 filing in Docket 
No. RP96-366-000. All active parties either supported or did not oppose 
the Settlement but one party requested that a provision included in the 
Settlement be incorporated into FGT's Tariff. By order issued January 
16, 1996 (January 16 Order) the Commission approved the Settlement and 
required FGT to incorporate a Settlement provision regarding a recorded 
phone message into its Tariff. FGT states that instant filing is in 
compliance with the January 16 Order.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC, 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2116 Filed 1-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANDRE AUDIGE and CLAUDETTE AUDIGE,

Appellants,

v.

KEVIN MOORE, JACQUELINE MOORE, FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE 

INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST 

COMPANY AMERICAS,

Appellees.

No. 4D17-1670

[December 7, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; David Haimes, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 15-019975 

(08).

Andre Audige and Claudette Audige, Coram, New York, pro se.

Jennifer L. Gauthier of Ritter Chusid, LLP, Coral Springs, for appellees, 

Kevin Moore and Jacqueline Moore.

Beth A. Norrow of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Orlando and Barry L. 

Rothberg of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami, for appellee, Deutsche Bank 

Trust Company Americas.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.