alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S. 1184

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and six

An Act

To waive the passport fees for a relative of a deceased member of the Armed

Forces proceeding abroad to visit the grave of such member or to attend a

funeral or memorial service for such member.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PASSPORT FEES.

Section 1 of the Act of June 4, 1920 (41 Stat. 750, chapter

223; 22 U.S.C. 214) is amended in the third sentence by striking

‘‘or from a widow, child, parent, brother, or sister of a deceased

member of the Armed Forces proceeding abroad to visit the grave

of such member’’ and inserting ‘‘or from a widow, widower, child,

parent, grandparent, brother, or sister of a deceased member of

the Armed Forces proceeding abroad to visit the grave of such

member or to attend a funeral or memorial service for such

member’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**NEWS
      RELEASE**





**FOR
      RELEASE: IMMEDIATELY**





**WAYNE
      SAVINGS BANCSHARES, INC. DECLARES QUARTERLY DIVIDEND**





Wooster,
      Ohio (June 28, 2007) – Wayne
      Savings Bancshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:WAYN), the stock holding company parent of
      Wayne Savings Community Bank, has declared a cash dividend of
      $.12  per share on the Company’s common stock for the quarter ending
      June 30, 2007.  This represents an annualized dividend of $.48 per
      share.  The quarterly cash dividend will be paid on July 25, 2007 to
      stockholders of record as of July 11, 2007.





At
      March 31, 2007, Wayne Savings
      Bancshares, Inc. had total assets of $405.7 million, deposits of $333.5 million,
      and stockholders’ equity of $34.4 million, or 8.49% of total
      assets.





Established
      in 1899, Wayne Savings Community Bank, the wholly owned subsidiary of Wayne
      Savings Bancshares, Inc., has eleven full-service banking locations in the
      communities of Wooster, Ashland, Millersburg, Rittman, Lodi, North Canton,
      and
      Creston, Ohio.








*Statements
      contained in this news release which are not historical facts may be
      forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities
      Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are subject
      to
      risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially
      from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors. Factors which
      could
      result in material variations include, but are not limited to, changes in
      interest rates which could affect net interest margins and net interest income,
      competitive factors which could affect net interest income and noninterest
      income, changes in demand for loans, deposits and other financial services
      in
      the Company's market area; changes in asset quality, general economic conditions
      as well as other factors discussed in documents filed by the Company with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time. The Company undertakes
      no
      obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or
      circumstances that occur after the date on which such statements were
      made.*





**CONTACT
                PERSON:**
            **H.
                Stewart Fitz Gibbon III****Executive
                Vice President****Chief
                Financial Officer****(330)
                264-5767**
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Strategic Plan lays out goals for 2015-2022   

By Beth ReeceDLA Public Affairs

                FORT BELVOIR, Virginia  –                                            - Warfighter First – Make promises and keep them.
                              - People and Culture – Valued team members; resilient and ready for the challenge.
                              - Strategic Engagement – Better outcomes through teamwork.
                              - Financial Stewardship – Affordable solutions and continued accountability.
                              - Process Excellence – Always improving; finding smarter ways to do things.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Warfighter FirstPeople and CultureStrategic EngagementFinancial StewardshipProcess ExcellenceDLA Strategic Plan
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1295 Referred in House (RFH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1295

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 13, 2005

          Referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to provide for accountability 
         and funding of the National Indian Gaming Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Indian Gaming Commission 
Accountability Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. COMMISSION ACCOUNTABILITY AND FUNDING.

    (a) Powers of the Commission.--Section 7 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2706) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(d) Application of Government Performance and Results Act.--
            ``(1) In general.--In carrying out any action under this 
        Act, the Commission shall be subject to the Government 
        Performance and Results Act of 1993 (Public Law 103-62; 107 
        Stat. 285).
            ``(2) Plans.--In addition to any plan required under the 
        Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (Public Law 103-
        62; 107 Stat. 285), the Commission shall submit a plan to 
        provide technical assistance to tribal gaming operations in 
        accordance with that Act.''.
    (b) Commission Funding.--Section 18(a)(2) of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2717(a)(2)) is amended by striking 
subparagraph (B) and inserting the following:
                    ``(B) The total amount of all fees imposed during 
                any fiscal year under the schedule established under 
                paragraph (1) shall not exceed 0.080 percent of the 
                gross gaming revenues of all gaming operations subject 
                to regulation under this Act.''.

            Passed the Senate December 12, 2005.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### Herbert VAN DERVEN et ux., et al., Appellants, v. Mary Elizabeth HASKINS, a free dealer, Appellee.

No. 77-307.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 30, 1978.

Rehearing Denied July 10, 1978.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Miami, for appellants.

*16Harris, Albury & Morgan, Key West, Joe N. Unger and Mark King Leban, Miami, for appellee.

Before HUBBART and KEHOE, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Lee Engineering and Construction Co. v. Fellows,*209 So.2d 454 (Fla.1968); *Garrett v. Oak Hall Club,*118 So.2d 633 (Fla.1960); *Bradham v. Hayes Enterprises, Inc.,*306 So.2d 568 (Fla.1st DCA 1975); *Kaplan v. Lennecker,*293 So.2d 738 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); *Ferrer v. McMurry,*238 So.2d 315 (Fla.3d DCA 1970); *Titusville Enterprises, Inc. v. Newkirk,*205 So.2d 16 (Fla.4th DCA 1967); *St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. v. Hodor,*200 So.2d 205 (Fla.3d DCA 1967); *Brooks v. Adams,*115 So.2d 578 (Fla.2d DCA 1959); *Robbins v. Grace,*103 So.2d 658 (Fla.2d DCA 1958).
No. 00-6602.

#### Pritchett *v.*Smith.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         45505
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  61635
<ALLOWANCES>                                   46473
<INVENTORY>                                    189638
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               294696
<PP&E>                                         309910
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (136979)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1563703
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          769892
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       65439
<OTHER-SE>                                     728372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1563703
<SALES>                                        62750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               62750
<CGS>                                          174990
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  174990
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3853512
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               487784
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5936
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4382785)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4382785)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4382785)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (15.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (15.14)
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**


**18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #9 Ltd. (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Nancy J. McGurk, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By:
    /s/Nancy
      J. McGurkName:
    Nancy
      J. McGurkTitle:
    Chief
      Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
    May
      16, 2005




17
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 95-20491 Summary Calendar

_____________________ MORGAN JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JOHNNY KLEVENHAGEN, Sheriff; K. W. BERRY, Captain; JOHN DOE, Lieutenant,
Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(H-93-CV-2424)

_________________________________________________________________ December 7, 1995 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Morgan E. Johnson filed a civil rights complaint under 42

U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that, while an inmate in the Harris County jail, he was denied due process in connection with a disciplinary hearing. S ee Johnson v. Klevenhagen , No. 92-2832 (5th Cir. July
26, 1994).

On remand, the district court pro perly awarded summary judgment to the defendants because Johnson did not present specific- 2 -

facts showing the existence of a genuine issue for trial. E.g.,
Little v. Liquid Air Corp. , 37 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir. 1994) (en
banc); Sandin v. Conner , ___ U.S. ___, 115 S. Ct. 2293, 2297-2302
(1995). The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Johnson's motion for appointment of counsel, Ulmer v. Chancellor , 6 91 F.2d 209, 212 (5th Cir. 1982); and it did not err by not conducting a hearing pursuant to Spears v. McCotter , 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985). Finally, Johnson had all the notice to which he

was entitled prior to the entry of summary judg ment. M artin v. Harrison County Jail , 975 F.2d 192, 193 (5th Cir. 1992). The summary judgment is, therefore,

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23


                            INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


               We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
          Statements No. 33-47517, 33-70834 and 33-78928 of Advanced NMR
          Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form S-8 of our report dated
          November 29, 1995 on the consolidated financial statements of the
          Company and its subsidiaries for the nine month period ended
          September 30, 1995 and the years ended December 31, 1994 and
          December 31, 1993 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
          the Company.



                                        Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP


          Cambridge, Massachusetts
          January 10, 1996
# C_2013101EN.01000803.xml

| 6.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 24 December 2012 — Helm Düngemittel GmbH v Hauptzollamt Krefeld

(Case C-613/12)

2013/C 101/18

Language of the case: German

Requesting court

Requesting court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Helm Düngemittel GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Krefeld

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Has the origin of goods not been established in the case where a partial movement certificate for the goods was issued under Article 20 of Protocol 4 concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation, as amended by Decision No 1/2006 of the EU-Egypt Association Council of 17 February 2006, (1) although the requirements of that provision were not fulfilled because the goods were not under the control of the issuing customs authorities at the point in time at which the partial movement certificate was issued.

1

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 73, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2


  Certification of Chief Executive  Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Big Sky Industries I,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the quarter  ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Randy
Moseley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


    Date: May 20, 2008                              /s/ Randy Moseley
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Randy Moseley
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                 SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Central Jersey Bancorp (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September 30, 2006, as filed with
the  Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, James S. Vaccaro,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of ss.13(a) or 15(d) of
         the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  15 U.S.C.  ss.78m or
         78o(d), and,

(2)      the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Dated: November 9, 2006                     /s/ James S. Vaccaro
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           James S. Vaccaro
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED RESOURCES, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. HERBERT H. JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 77-1234.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 24, 1978.

Guy B. Bailey, Jr., and William Berger, Miami, for appellant.

A. John Goshgarian, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON and HUBBART, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: *Mike Bradford & Co. v. Gulf States Steel Co.,*184 So.2d 911, 913, 915 (Fla.3d DCA 1966); *Hall v. Nationwide Insurance Company,*189 So.2d 224, 225 (Fla.4th DCA 1966); *Ojus Industries, Inc.*v. *Mann,*221 So.2d 780, 782 (Fla.3d DCA 1969); *Gettles*v. *Commercial Bank at Winter Park,*276 So.2d 837, 839-840 (Fla.4th DCA 1973); *Seville Condominium # 1, Inc.*v. *Clearwater Development Corporation,*340 So.2d 1243, 1245 (Fla.2d DCA 1977).
EX-10.2


 Exhibit 10.2 

Apache Corporation 

Executive Termination Policy 
 This
Policy, which provides for the payment of certain benefits upon termination of employment, applies to: 
  

	(i)	All executive officers in the event of a termination of employment without cause, and 

  

	(ii)	The chief executive officer in the event of a termination upon a Change of Control (as defined in the Company’s 2011 Omnibus Plan). 


Pursuant to the Policy, in the event of a termination of employment without cause, executive officers are eligible to receive the following benefits: 

 

	 	•	 	base salary benefit: 

  

	 	•	 	two times base salary for the chief executive officer; 

  

	 	•	 	1.75 times base salary for executive vice presidents; 

  

	 	•	 	1.5 times base salary for senior vice presidents and regional vice presidents; 

  

	 	•	 	one times base salary for vice presidents; 

  

	 	•	 	prorated target bonus; 

  

	 	•	 	twelve months COBRA subsidy at active rates; 

  

	 	•	 	three years’ service credit toward retiree medical; 

  

	 	•	 	prorated vesting for restricted stock units and stock options and extension of exercise period to full life of original stock option award; and 


 

	 	•	 	prorated vesting based on time in performance period for performance shares provided the executive has participated in the performance program for at least one year of the performance period (calculated at the end of
the performance period and, if a payout is warranted, paid in cash according to the performance program’s vesting schedule). 

 In the
event of a termination of employment upon a Change of Control, the chief executive officer of the Company will receive a year of annual base salary plus bonus, in addition to the benefits for which he is already eligible after a termination upon a
Change of Control under the Company’s Income Continuance Plan. 






 A condition precedent to an executive officer receiving the benefits under this Executive Termination Policy will
be for such executive to provide a full and final release to the Company of all claims in a form of release approved by the Company’s general counsel or chief executive officer. 

After a termination of employment upon a Change of Control, all executive officers (other than the chief executive officer) will receive no additional
benefits pursuant to this Policy. Benefits for such officers after termination of employment upon a Change of Control will continue to be administered under the Company’s Income Continuance Plan and existing equity grant agreements with the
Company.