alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             446
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,051
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (443)
<INVENTORY>                                        513
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   296
<PP&E>                                           5,583
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,381
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,066
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,796
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              235
<PREFERRED>                                      1,750
<COMMON>                                      (16,547)
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,169)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,066
<SALES>                                         10,555
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,555
<CGS>                                            5,985
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,985
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,762
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,515)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,707)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,707)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,707)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.08)


</TABLE>
### SERVED:MAY 31,2012 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC INTHEMATTEROF PREMIERJETS, INC. FAADOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0470 NOTICE OFASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING · 

### -I 

### 1: 3l

This proceeding (heretofore designated as CaseNo. 2011WP910359) has been assigned to AdministrativeLawJudgeRichard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings andother communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, theFAAHearing Docket, and the otherpersons onthe attached ServiceList.

Attachment - Service ListSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 Roger B. Kelsay, President Premiere Jets, Inc., Respondent P. 0. Box 91430 2140 N.E. 25th Avenue Hillsboro, OR 97124 TEL: 503-640-2927 FAX: 503-681-3064

ONE COPY Michael F. McKinley, Complainant's Counsel

Senior Attorney, Enforcement Division, AGC-300 Office of the Chief Counsel Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 TEL: 202-267-7100 FAX: 202-267.;5106

The Honorable Richard C. G,oodwin, Administrative Law Judge Office of Hearings, M-20 U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant FAX: 202-366-7536

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0470 (Civil Penalty Action) 1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. -2-
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2344 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 366
112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2344

To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until December 31, 2012.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 24 (legislative day, April 23), 2012

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                     ordered placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until December 31, 2012.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM.

    (a) Program Extension.--Section 1319 of the National Flood 
Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4026) is amended by striking ``the 
earlier of the date of the enactment into law of an Act that 
specifically amends the date specified in this section or May 31, 
2012'' and inserting ``December 31, 2012''.
    (b) Financing.--Section 1309(a) of the National Flood Insurance Act 
of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is amended by striking ``the earlier of the 
date of the enactment into law of an Act that specifically amends the 
date specified in this section or May 31, 2012'' and inserting 
``December 31, 2012''.
                                                       Calendar No. 366

112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2344

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until December 31, 2012.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 24, 2012

             Read twice and ordered placed on the calendar
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 23, 2014

h1217 

# Order

Clerk December 23, 2014

149241 & (17)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 149241

COA: 318976

Wayne CC: 01

- 003175

- FC

ANTHONY T. LEGION,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to file a pro per supplement to the application

for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 17,

2014 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the

defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR

6.508(D).
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Energy adds new customers to Direct Supply Natural Gas Program

By Tanekwa BournesDLA Energy Public Affairs

                FORT BELVOIR, Virginia  –              Installation Energy

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA Energynatural gasAltus Air Force BaseDLA SusquehannaInstallation Energycost savings
STEVEN ATHOMPSON Executive Director
December 5, 2007 OKLAHOMA OiPAHMENT Of**~N~IQONM'NT.u** OU411[Y 

### OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENTOF ENVIRONMENTALQUALITY BRAD HENRY Governor

Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section Mail Code (6PD-L) USEPA Region 6 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 Subject: Oklahoma's Section 110 (a) (2) (D) Transport SIP & CAA Section 110 (a) (I) and (2) -Certification ofAdequacy ofOklahoma's SIP

DearMr. Donaldson, C>**~:;1;/** 

# ..... 0 :;urn [T\ 

### -on ("")**r~** 

### :t>< c:> zrrl :;z:O -0 

### z: I 

### :x ClC.f"; 

# '" (...")V 

# '" p,S: W**t~'** The purpose of this letter is to resolve two outstanding SIP issues. It will provide the additional information needed for approval ofour transport SIP. Also, it will address the adequacy ofOklahoma's existing SIP to meet the requirements in CAA Section 110 (a) (I) and (2).

Please find enclosed the additional information requested by your staff. The enclosure should be combined with our original transport SIP submittal (May 2007) and will provide additional assessments ofOklahoma's impact On the nearest modeled 2010 nonattainrnent areas. The enclosure is comprised of three parts and will add anew Part7 to ChapterIII, SectionA andnew Appendices G and H.

We have evaluated our existing SIP for implementation ofthe 1997 8-hour ozoneNAAQS to determine if it includes all the requirements in Section 110 (a) (I) and (2) of the CAA and is consistent with the guidance provided to the Regional Air DivisionDirectors from William T. Harnett, Director, Air Quality PolicyDivision on October 2, 2007. We conclude and certify that our SIP does meet these requirements. Over the next few months, we will be evaluating the particulate matter provisions of our SIP for

. consistency with federal requirements and will provide updates' during our regularly scheduled

AQDIEPA6 SIP planning conference calls.

Ifyou have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact Cheryl Bradley or Leon Ashford at**405-702-41O~.** Sincerely, 

# qL**~;l~~** Eddie Terrill Division Director

Enclosures

ET:LA:gg

707 NORTH ROBINSON, P.O. BOX 1677, OKlAHOMACITY, OKlAHOMA73101-1677
printed on recycled paper with BOY ink 

### to.'
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DONNELL RIDDICK,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 527 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of November, 2016

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Petitioner, v. Glenda Dale NELSON, Yvonne McClean, Gladstone Granza, Herman Nelson, Jessie Hollingsworth and Yvonne Freeman, Respondents.

No. 77-505.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 14, 1978.

Marjorie D. Gadarian of Jones, Paine & Foster, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Wallace B. McCall of Johnson, Ackerman & Bakst, West Palm Beach, for respondents.

DOWNEY, Judge.

By Petition for Writ of Certiorari Ford Motor Company seeks review of an order of the trial court striking Ford’s affirmative defense of failure to use available seat belts in a suit arising out of an automobile accident.

The question presented arises as a result of an interlocutory order in a case formerly cognizable at law. Thus it may be reviewed by Writ of Certiorari if the action of the trial court constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of law and there is no full, adequate and complete review available to petitioner by plenary appeal from the final judgment.

From petitioner’s viewpoint the operative word here is “adequate” because petitioner states in its brief:

> “If Ford must wait until after final judgment for review of this matter, it faces the possible expense of two trials. Cer-tiori should lie to review the order as it would be a waste of judicial time and labor for review to be delayed until after final adjudication.”

But that argument is applicable in almost every erstwhile common law action in which a pleading has been stricken or such a motion denied. If the ruling is error and it could have affected the outcome of the case, then a second trial may be necessary. The cases are not entirely consistent on this point, but this court has answered petitioner’s contention in a number of recent cases. *Siegel v. Abramowitz,*309 So.2d 234 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); *Solitron Devices, Inc. v. Reiland,*311 So.2d 729 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); *Simpson*v. *Broward County,*241 So.2d 193*159(Fla. 4th DCA 1970). We see no reason not to follow those eases which adhere to the traditional concepts of review by common law certiorari.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of cer-tiorari is denied.

DENIED.

DAUKSCH and MOORE, JJ., concur.
S. 1340

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

An Act

To amend the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act to extend the date after

which surplus funds in the wildlife restoration fund become available for apportionment.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF SURPLUS FUNDS IN WILDLIFE RESTORATION FUND.

Section 3(b)(2)(C) of the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration

Act (16 U.S.C. 669b(b)(2)(C) is amended by striking ‘‘2006’’ and

inserting ‘‘2016’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
No. 43289.

#### Protest 53585-G of H. L. Distiilator (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is similar to that involved in *United States*v. *Amrein*(26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

29806

29-OCT-2013

08:23 AM
No. 99-8352 (99A685).

#### Bryan *v.*Florida.

C. A. 11th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.
----

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) 

I, Mingda Rong,  certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, basedupon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the period endedDecember 31, 2006 of the Registrant (the "Report"): 

(1) 

The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) 

The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by theRegistrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request. 

SIGNATURE

| Date: March 05, 2008
/s/  Mingda Rong
 
 
 
 
    Mingda Rong
  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### James BROWN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1547.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 28, 1977.

*215Braxton R. Ezell, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

RYDER, Judge.

Appellant Brown was charged by information with two counts of aggravated battery, each occurring separate from the other. The information alleged further that a pistol was used in the course of each distinct crime.

Appellant voluntarily entered a guilty plea to each charge. The transcript of the plea and sentencing hearing clearly reflects that the trial judge desired to sentence appellant to concurrent three-year terms, but he interpreted Section 775.087, Florida Statutes (1975) as mandating consecutive sentences. The trial judge also opined that the same statute prohibited appellant from receiving credit for time served. Appellant reserved the right to appeal and argues that Section 775.087, Florida Statutes (1975) does not prohibit either concurrent sentencing or the granting of credit for time previously served. We agree.

Section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1975) reads in part, “Any person who is convicted of *any . .*. aggravated battery . who had in his possession a ‘firearm’ . shall be sentenced to a minimum term of imprisonment of three years.” (emphasis added). Had the legislature intended that one convicted of two or more crimes under this statute must be sentenced consecutively, it seems logical that the statute would have been drafted to read, “Any person who is convicted of *each . . .*aggravated battery . . . Such is not the case with this statute. Use of the word “any” indicates that the sentencing judge is given discretion to sentence a defendant convicted on a multiple count information under the statute to consecutive or concurrent minimum three-year terms. Our interpretation of legislative intent here is supported by the fact that whenever the legislature wishes to require a sentence to be served consecutively, they have affirmatively provided for its imposition. *See*Section 944.40, Florida Statutes (1975), mandating the sentence of one convicted of escape to run consecutive to any former sentence.

It was error to deny appellant credit for time served. The mandatory minimum sentence provision of Section 775.087, Florida Statutes (1975), does not preclude allowance of credit for time served prior to imposition of sentence. *Bacon v. State,*346 So.2d 629 (Fla.2d DCA 1977); *Lingo v. State,*344 So.2d 629 (Fla.2d DCA 1977).

Appellant’s convictions are affirmed, but we remand this case for resentencing of appellant within the trial judge’s discretion consistent with this opinion. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and DANAHY, J., concur.
HomeAbout TVAPower SystemEnvironmental StewardshipRiver SystemEconomic DevelopmentInvestor Info Newsroom

### Environmental Reviews

Mountain Reservoirs  Land           Management Plan

Land           Management Planning Process

Maps of Mountain           Reservoirs

 

# Fontana Reservoir

The panel below is divided into blocks as shown. Click on a block             for a closer view of that portion of the map. 

The parcels shown on each map are color-coded according to their             land-use zone. See the Map               Legend (PDF, 102 kb) for an explanation of the colors.

The parcels are also numbered. See Fontana Parcel Matrix  (PDF, 77 kb) for a description of the designated use for each parcel. 

The blocks are printable in an 8 1/2” by 11” PDF format. (PDF             files require Adobe Acrobat Reader.) 

A2 (PDF, 218 kb)

B1 (PDF, 345 kb)B2(PDF, 438 kb)B3 (PDF, 361 kb)B4 (PDF, 369 kb)B5 (PDF, 437 kb)B6 (PDF, 332 kb)B7 (PDF, 283 kb)

C3 (PDF, 220 kb)C4 (PDF, 283 kb)C5 (PDF, 469 kb)C6 (PDF, 377 kb)

D5 (PDF, 269 kb)D6 (PDF, 209 kb)

Contact UsSearchLegal NoticesPrivacy PolicyEmploymentFOIANo Fear Act DataLinking PolicyTVA HomeAbout TVAPowerEnvironmentRiversEconomic DevelopmentInvestorsNews
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 153 (Friday, August 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42820]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21025]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33, 195]

Reynolds Metals Company, Fulton Can Plant, Fulton, New York; 
Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Acting Director of the Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Reynolds Metals Company, 
Fulton Can Plant, Fulton, New York. The review indicated that the 
application contained no new substantial information which would bear 
importantly on the Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of 
the application was issued.

TA-W-33, 195; Reynolds Metals Company, Fulton Can Plant, Fulton, New 
York (July 30, 1997)

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 30th day of July, 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-21025 Filed 8-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```
EXHIBIT 23





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of AMC Entertainment Inc.:


We  consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
of AMC Entertainment Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-58129, 2-92048, 2-97522
and  2-97523)  of  our  report dated May 1, 1998,  on  our  audits  of  the
consolidated financial statements of AMC Entertainment Inc. as of April  2,
1998 and April 3, 1997, and for each of the three years (53/52 weeks) ended
April 2, 1998, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
August 4, 1998
Back to Contents

**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

We have issued our reports dated March 28, 2005, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and Schedule II and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of SavientPharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements Nos. 33-51202, 33-83904, 33-69870, 33-41591, 33-41593, 333-36121, 333-33073,333-33075, 333-64541, and 333-87344 on Form S-8 of Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP          GRANT THORNTON LLPNew York, New YorkMarch 28, 2005

----