Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 158 / Friday, August 15, 1997 / Proposed Rules 43679

Pursuant to 8 CFR 252.1(d)(1)(ii), this

conditional landing permit is valid for

multiple landings for an aggregate of no more

than 29 days during the 90-day period

following the date of your in-person

examination before an officer of the

Immigration and Naturalization Service

(Service). You must present yourself for

another in-person examination before an

officer of the Service upon expiration of this

90-day period. This landing authorization is

conditional, and you may be required to

present yourself for an in-person examination

before an officer of the Service at any time

during the 90-day period for which this

permit has been issued.

(f) Change of status. An alien

nonimmigrant crewman landed

pursuant to the provisions of this part

shall be ineligible for any extension of

stay or for a change of nonimmigrant

classification under 8 CFR part 248. A

crewman admitted under paragraph

(d)(1) of this section may, if still

maintaining status, apply for a

conditional landing permit under

paragraph (d)(2) of this section. The

application shall not be approved unless

an application on Form I–408,

Application to Pay Off or Discharge

Alien Crewman, filed pursuant to

paragraph (h) of this section, has been

approved authorizing the master or

agent of the vessel on which the

crewman arrived to pay off or discharge

the crewman and unless evidence is

presented by the master or agent of the

vessel to which the crewman will be

transferred that a specified position on

that vessel has been authorized for him

or her or that satisfactory arrangements

have been completed for the repatriation

of the alien crewman. If the application

is approved, the crewman shall be given

a new Form I–95AB endorsed to show

landing authorized under paragraph

(d)(2) of this section for the period

necessary to accomplish his or her

scheduled reshipment, which shall not

exceed 29 days from the date of his or

her landing, upon surrendering any

conditional landing permit previously

issued to him or her on Form I–95AB.

* * * * *

Dated: July 17, 1997.

Doris Meissner,

Commissioner, Immigration and

Naturalization Service.

[FR Doc. 97–21708 Filed 8–14–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–10–M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA 128–0043; FRL–5876–1]

Approval and Promulgation of State

Implementation Plans; California State

Implementation Plan Revision, San

Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution

Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to act on

revisions to the California State

Implementation Plan (SIP) which

concern five negative declarations from

the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air

Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD)

for the following Oxides of Nitrogen

(NOX) source categories: Nitric and

Adipic Acid Manufacturing Plants,

Cement Manufacturing Plants, Asphalt

Batch Plants, Iron and Steel

Manufacturing Plants, and Driers. The

intended effect of proposing to include

these negative declarations in the SIP is

to meet the requirements of the Clean

Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or

the Act). In the Final Rules Section of

this Federal Register, the EPA is acting

on the state’s SIP revision as a direct

final rule without prior proposal

because the Agency views this as a

noncontroversial revision amendment

and anticipates no adverse comments. A

rationale for this action is set forth in

the direct final rule. If no adverse

comments are received in response to

this proposed rule, no further activity is

contemplated in relation to this rule. If

EPA receives adverse comments, the

direct final rule will be withdrawn and

all public comments received will be

addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on this proposed rule. The EPA

will not institute a second comment

period on this document. Any parties

interested in commenting on this action

should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule

must be received in writing by

September 15, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this

action should be addressed to: Julie A.

Rose, Rulemaking Office (AIR–4), Air

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street,

San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.

Copies of the negative declarations are

available for public inspection at EPA’s

Region 9 office and at the following

locations during normal business hours.

Rulemaking Office (AIR–4), Air

Division, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region IX, 75

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA

94105

Air Docket (6102), U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, 40l ‘‘M’’ Street,

SW., Washington, DC. 20460

California Air Resources Board,

Stationary Source Division, Rule

Evaluation Section, 2020 ‘‘L’’ Street,

Sacramento, CA 95812

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air

Pollution Control District, 1999

Tuolumne Street, Fresno, CA 93721

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie

A. Rose, Rulemaking Section, AIR–4,

Air Division, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region 9, 75

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA

94105–3901, Telephone: (415) 744–

1184.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

document concerns negative

declarations for five NOX source

categories from the SJVUAPCD: (1)

Nitric and Adipic Acid Manufacturing

Plants, (2) Cement Manufacturing

Plants, (3) Asphalt Batch Plants, (4) Iron

and Steel Manufacturing Plants, and (5)

Driers. These negative declarations

certify that there are no major sources

present in the above source categories in

the SJVUAPCD. They were adopted by

the SJVUAPCD on September 14, 1994

and submitted to EPA on October 17,

1994 by the California Air Resources

Board. For further information, please

see the information provided in the

Direct Final action which is located in

the Rules Section of this Federal

Register.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.

Dated: August 1, 1997.

Felicia Marcus,

Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 97–21693 Filed 8–14–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[MO 033–1033; FRL–5875–6]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; State of

Missouri

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to

approve State Implementation Plan

(SIP) revisions submitted by the state of

Missouri to create a new statewide

fugitive dust rule. In addition, the EPA

is proposing to rescind four area specific