Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 52 / Wednesday, March 18, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 14019 

Commodity Parts per 

million 

* * * * * * 

Papaya 1 ............................... 1.5 

* * * * * * 

1There are no U.S. registrations as of January 20, 2015. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2015–06106 Filed 3–17–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2014–0610; FRL–9924–47– 

Region 4] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Region 4 

States; 2008 Lead, 2008 Ozone and 

2010 Nitrogen Dioxide Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration Infrastructure 

Plans 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is approving portions of 

submissions from Alabama, Florida, 

Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, South 

Carolina and Tennessee for inclusion 

into each State’s implementation plan. 

This action pertains to the Clean Air Act 

(CAA or Act) infrastructure 

requirements for the 2008 Lead, 2008 

Ozone and 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) 

National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS). The CAA requires that each 

state adopt and submit a state 

implementation plan (SIP) for the 

implementation, maintenance, and 

enforcement of each NAAQS 

promulgated by EPA. These plans are 

commonly referred to as 

‘‘infrastructure’’ SIPs. Specifically, EPA 

is approving the portions of the 

submissions from Alabama, Florida, 

Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, South 

Carolina and Tennessee that relate to 

the infrastructure SIP prevention of 

significant deterioration (PSD) 

requirements. All other applicable 

infrastructure requirements for the 2008 

Lead, 2008 Ozone and 2010 NO2

NAAQS associated with these States are 

being addressed in separate 

rulemakings. 

DATES: This rule is effective on April 17, 

2015. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket 

Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR– 

2014–0610. All documents in the docket 

are listed on the www.regulations.gov 

Web site. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., Confidential Business 

Information or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Air Regulatory Management Section 

(formerly Regulatory Development 

Section), Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides 

and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sean Lakeman, Air Regulatory 

Management Section, Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides 

and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The 

telephone number is (404) 562–9043. 

Mr. Lakeman can be reached via 

electronic mail at lakeman.sean@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

By statute, SIPs meeting the 

requirements of sections 110(a)(1) and 

(2) are to be submitted by states within 

three years after promulgation of a new 

or revised NAAQS to provide for the 

implementation, maintenance, and 

enforcement of the new or revised 

NAAQS. EPA has historically referred to 

these SIP submissions made for the 

purpose of satisfying the requirements 

of CAA sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2) 

as ‘‘infrastructure SIP’’ submissions. 

Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) require states 

to address basic SIP elements such as 

for monitoring, basic program 

requirements and legal authority that 

are designed to assure attainment and 

maintenance of the newly established or 

revised NAAQS. More specifically, 

section 110(a)(1) provides the 

procedural and timing requirements for 

SIPs. Section 110(a)(2) lists specific 

elements that states must meet for the 

‘‘infrastructure’’ SIP requirements 

related to a newly established or revised 

NAAQS. The contents of an 

infrastructure SIP submission may vary 

depending upon the data and analytical 

tools available to the state, as well as the 

provisions already contained in the 

state’s implementation plan at the time 

in which the state develops and submits 

the submission for a new or revised 

NAAQS. 

Through this action, EPA is approving 

the PSD requirements of sections 

110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) 

and 110(a)(2)(J) (hereafter ‘‘PSD 

Elements’’) for various infrastructure 

SIP submissions from the states of 

Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, 

Mississippi, South Carolina and 

Tennessee. As described further below, 

for some of these states, EPA is 

approving the PSD Elements in the 

infrastructure SIP submissions for the 

2008 Lead, 2008 Ozone and 2010 NO2

NAAQS; whereas for other states, EPA 

is only approving the PSD Elements of 

the infrastructure SIP submissions for a 

subset of these NAAQS. All other 

applicable infrastructure requirements 

for the 2008 Lead, 2008 Ozone and 2010 

NO2 NAAQS associated with these 

States are being addressed in separate 

rulemakings. 

a. 2008 Lead NAAQS 

For the 2008 Lead NAAQS, EPA is 

only approving the PSD Elements of the 

infrastructure SIP submissions from 

Alabama (received November 4, 2011), 

Florida (received October 14, 2011), 

Georgia (received May 14, 2012), 

Kentucky (received July 17, 2012), 

Mississippi (received November 17, 

2011), and South Carolina (received 

September 20, 2011). EPA notes that the 

Agency approved the PSD Elements of 

Tennessee’s 2008 Lead infrastructure 

SIP submission on August 12, 2013 (78 

FR 48806). 

b. 2008 Ozone NAAQS 

For the 2008 Ozone NAAQS, EPA is 

only approving the PSD Elements of the 

infrastructure SIP submissions from 

Alabama (received August 20, 2012), 

Georgia (received March 6, 2012), 

Mississippi (received May 29, 2012; and 

resubmitted July 26, 2012), and South 

Carolina (received on July 17, 2012). 

EPA notes that the Agency approved the 

PSD Elements of the infrastructure SIP 

submissions for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS 

for Kentucky on March 7, 2013 (78 FR 

14691) and November 3, 2014 (79 FR 

65143), and Tennessee on March 6, 

2013 (78 FR 14450) and January 9, 2014 

(79 FR 1593). 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
14020 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 52 / Wednesday, March 18, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

c. 2010 NO2 NAAQS 

For the 2010 NO2 NAAQS, EPA is 

approving the PSD Elements of the 

infrastructure SIP submissions from 

Alabama (received April 23, 2013), 

Florida (received January 22, 2013), 

Georgia (received March 25, 2013), 

Kentucky (received April 26, 2013), 

Mississippi (received February 28, 

2013), South Carolina (received April 

30, 2014), and Tennessee (received 

March 13, 2014). 

EPA is acting upon the PSD Elements 

portions of SIP submissions that address 

the infrastructure requirements of CAA 

sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2) for the 

2008 Lead, 2008 Ozone and 2010 NO2

NAAQS for various states in Region 4. 

Section 110(a)(2) includes a list of 

specific elements that ‘‘[e]ach such 

plan’’ submission must address. EPA’s 

review of infrastructure SIP submissions 

with respect to the PSD program 

requirements in sections 110(a)(2)(C), 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), and 110(a)(2)(J) 

focuses upon the structural PSD 

program requirements contained in part 

C and EPA’s PSD regulations. Structural 

PSD program requirements include 

provisions necessary for the PSD 

program to address all regulated sources 

and new source review (NSR) 

pollutants, including GHGs. 

On November 13, 2014, EPA 

published a proposed rulemaking to 

approve the portions of the abovedescribed infrastructure SIP 

submissions from Alabama, Florida, 

Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, South 

Carolina and Tennessee to address the 

PSD permitting requirements of sections 

110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) 

and 110(a)(2)(J) of the CAA. See 79 FR 

67398. Comments on the proposed 

rulemaking were due on or before 

December 15, 2014. No adverse 

comments were received. EPA’s 

November 13, 2014, proposed 

rulemaking contains more detailed 

information regarding Alabama, Florida, 

Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, South 

Carolina and Tennessee submissions to 

address the PSD permitting 

requirements being approved today, and 

the rationale for this final action. 

II. What are states required to address 

under Sections 110(a)(2)(C), 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (Prong 3) and 

110(a)(2)(J) related to PSD? 

Section 110(a)(2)(C) has three 

components that must be addressed in 

infrastructure SIP submissions: 

Enforcement, state-wide regulation of 

new and modified minor sources and 

minor modifications of major sources; 

and PSD permitting of major sources 

and major modifications in areas 

designated attainment or unclassifiable 

for the subject NAAQS as required by 

CAA title I part C (i.e., the major source 

PSD program). 

Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) has two 

components; 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II). Each of these 

components have two subparts resulting 

in four distinct components, commonly 

referred to as ‘‘prongs,’’ that must be 

addressed in infrastructure SIP 

submissions. The first two prongs, 

which are codified in section 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), are provisions that 

prohibit any source or other type of 

emissions activity in one state from 

contributing significantly to 

nonattainment of the NAAQS in another 

state (‘‘prong 1’’), and interfering with 

maintenance of the NAAQS in another 

state (‘‘prong 2’’). The third and fourth 

prongs, which are codified in section 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), are provisions that 

prohibit emissions activity in one state 

interfering with measures required to 

prevent significant deterioration of air 

quality in another state (‘‘prong 3’’), or 

to protect visibility in another state 

(‘‘prong 4’’). 

Section 110(a)(2)(J) has four 

components that must be addressed in 

infrastructure SIP submissions: (1) 

Consultation with government officials, 

(2) public notification, (3) prevention of 

significant deterioration, and (4) 

visibility protection. 

With respect to the PSD Elements of 

these sections, EPA interprets the CAA 

to require each state to make, for each 

new or revised NAAQS, an 

infrastructure SIP submission that 

demonstrates that the air agency has a 

complete PSD permitting program 

meeting the current requirements for all 

regulated NSR pollutants. 

See EPA’s November 13, 2014, 

proposed rulemaking at 79 FR 67398 for 

more detailed information on EPA’s 

analysis of how the Alabama, Florida, 

Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, South 

Carolina and Tennessee infrastructure 

SIP submissions meet the requirements 

of the PSD Elements for the NAAQS for 

which they were submitted. As 

mentioned above, EPA did not receive 

any adverse comments on the November 

13, 2014, proposed rulemaking. As such 

and based on EPA’s analysis, the 

Agency has made the determination 

that: 

• Alabama’s SIP and practices are 

adequate and comply with PSD 

Elements for the 2008 Lead, 2008 Ozone 

and 2010 NO2 NAAQS; 

• Florida’s SIP and practices are 

adequate and comply with PSD 

Elements for the 2008 Lead and 2010 

NO2 NAAQS; 

• Georgia’s SIP and practices are 

adequate and comply with the PSD 

Elements for the 2008 Lead, 2008 

Ozone, and 2010 NO2 NAAQS; 

• Kentucky’s SIP and practices are 

adequate and comply with the PSD 

Elements for the 2008 Lead and 2010 

NO2 NAAQS; 

• Mississippi’s SIP and practices are 

adequate and comply with the PSD 

Elements for the 2008 Lead, 2008 

Ozone, and 2010 NO2 NAAQS; 

• South Carolina’s SIP and practices 

are adequate and comply with the 

infrastructure SIP PSD Elements for the 

2008 Lead, 2008 Ozone, and 2010 NO2

NAAQS; and 

• Tennessee’s SIP and practices are 

adequate and comply with the 

infrastructure SIP PSD Elements for the 

2010 NO2 NAAQS. 

III. Final Action 

As described above, EPA is approving 

the portions of the above-described 

infrastructure SIP submissions from 

Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, 

Mississippi, South Carolina and 

Tennessee to address the PSD 

permitting requirements of sections 

110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) 

and 110(a)(2)(J) of the CAA. As 

described above, for some of these 

states, EPA is approving the PSD 

Elements of the infrastructure SIP 

submissions for the 2008 Lead, 2008 

Ozone and 2010 Nitrogen NO2 NAAQS; 

whereas for other states, EPA is only 

approving the PSD Elements of the 

infrastructure SIP submissions for a 

subset of these NAAQS. EPA is 

approving these portions of these 

submissions because they are consistent 

with section 110 of the CAA. 

EPA also notes that, at present, the 

Agency has preliminarily determined 

that the Alabama, Florida, Georgia, 

Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina 

and Tennessee SIPs are sufficient to 

satisfy the PSD permitting requirements 

portion of section 110(a)(2)(C), 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), prong 3 and 

110(a)(2)(J) with respect to GHGs 

because the PSD permitting program 

previously-approved by EPA into the 

SIP continues to require that PSD 

permits (otherwise required based on 

emissions of pollutants other than 

GHGs) contain limitations on GHG 

emissions based on the application of 

Best Available Control Technology. 

Although the approved Alabama, 

Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, 

South Carolina and Tennessee PSD 

permitting programs may currently 

contain provisions that are no longer 

necessary in light of the Supreme 

Court’s Utility Air Regulatory Group v. 

Environmental Protection Agency 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 52 / Wednesday, March 18, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 14021 

decision, these previous approvals do 

not render the infrastructure SIP 

submission inadequate to satisfy 

sections 110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) 

(prong 3) and 110(a)(2)(J). The SIPs 

contain the necessary PSD requirements 

at this time, and the application of those 

requirements is not impeded by the 

presence of other previously-approved 

provisions regarding the permitting of 

sources of GHGs that EPA does not 

consider necessary at this time in light 

of the Supreme Court decision. 

Accordingly, the Supreme Court 

decision does not affect EPA’s approval 

of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, 

Mississippi, South Carolina and 

Tennessee’s infrastructure SIPs as to the 

PSD permitting requirements of sections 

110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) 

and 110(a)(2)(J). 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable federal regulations. 

See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

With the exception of South Carolina, 

the SIPs involved in this action are not 

approved to apply on any Indian 

reservation land or in any other area 

where EPA or an Indian tribe has 

demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 

country, the rule does not have tribal 

implications as specified by Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000), nor will it impose substantial 

direct costs on tribal governments or 

preempt tribal law.’’ With respect to this 

action as it relates to South Carolina, 

EPA notes that the Catawba Indian 

Nation Reservation is located within 

South Carolina and pursuant to the 

Catawba Indian Claims Settlement Act, 

S.C. Code Ann. 27–16–120, ‘‘all state 

and local environmental laws and 

regulations apply to the Catawba Indian 

Nation and Reservation and are fully 

enforceable by all relevant state and 

local agencies and authorities.’’ Thus, 

the South Carolina SIP applies to the 

Catawba Reservation, however, because 

this action is not approving any specific 

rule into the South Carolina SIP, but 

rather proposing that the State’s already 

approved SIP meets certain CAA 

requirements, EPA has determined that 

there are no substantial direct effects on 

the Catawba Indian Nation. EPA has 

also determined that these revisions will 

not impose any substantial direct costs 

on tribal governments or preempt tribal 

law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by May 18, 2015. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. See section 

307(b)(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Dated: March 6, 2015. 

Heather McTeer Toney, 

Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart B—Alabama 

■ 2. Section 52.50(e), is amended by 

adding three new entries for ‘‘110(a)(1) 

and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for 

the 2008 Lead NAAQS’’, ‘‘110(a)(1) and 

(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 

2008 Ozone NAAQS’’, and ‘‘110(a)(1) 

and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for 

the 2010 NO2 NAAQS’’ at the end of the 

table to read as follows: 

§ 52.50 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
14022 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 52 / Wednesday, March 18, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

EPA-APPROVED ALABAMA NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS

Name of 

nonregulatory SIP 

provision 

Applicable geographic or 

nonattainment area 

State submittal 

date/effective 

date 

EPA Approval date Explanation 

*******

110(a)(1) and (2) 

Infrastructure Requirements for 

the 2008 Lead 

NAAQS.

Alabama ............................. 11/4/2011 3/18/2015 Federal Register citation Addressing the PSD permitting requirements of sections 

110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) 

(prong 3) and 110(a)(2)(J) only. 

110(a)(1) and (2) 

Infrastructure Requirements for 

the 2008 Ozone 

NAAQS.

Alabama ............................. 8/20/2012 3/18/2015 [Insert Federal Register 

citation].

Addressing the PSD permitting requirements of sections 

110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) 

(prong 3) and 110(a)(2)(J) only. 

110(a)(1) and (2) 

Infrastructure Requirements for 

the 2010 NO2

NAAQS.

Alabama ............................. 4/23/2013 3/18/2015 [Insert Federal Register 

citation].

Addressing the PSD permitting requirements of sections 

110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) 

(prong 3) and 110(a)(2)(J) only. 

Subpart K—Florida 

■ 3. Section 52.520(e), is amended by 

adding two new entries for ‘‘110(a)(1) 

and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for 

the 2008 Lead NAAQS’’ and ‘‘110(a)(1) 

and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for 

the 2010 NO2 NAAQS’’ at the end of the 

table to read as follows: 

§ 52.520 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED FLORIDA NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS

Provision State effective 

date 

EPA Approval 

date Federal Register notice Explanation 

*******

110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements 

for the 2008 Lead 

NAAQS.

10/14/2011 3/18/2015 [Insert Federal Register 

citation].

Addressing the PSD permitting requirements of sections 110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) and 

110(a)(2)(J) only. 

110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements 

for the 2010 NO2

NAAQS.

1/22/2013 3/18/2015 [Insert Federal Register 

citation].

Addressing the PSD permitting requirements of sections 110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) and 

110(a)(2)(J) only. 

Subpart L—Georgia 

■ 4. Section 52.570(e), is amended by 

adding three new entries for ‘‘110(a)(1) 

and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for 

the 2008 Lead NAAQS’’, ‘‘110(a)(1) and 

(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 

2008 Ozone NAAQS’’, and ‘‘110(a)(1) 

and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for 

the 2010 NO2 NAAQS’’ at the end of the 

table to read as follows: 

§ 52.570 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED GEORGIA NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS

Name of 

nonregulatory SIP 

provision 

Applicable geographic or 

nonattainment area 

State submittal 

date/effective 

date 

EPA Approval date Explanation 

*******

110(a)(1) and (2) 

Infrastructure Requirements for 

the 2008 Lead 

NAAQS.

Georgia .............................. 5/14/2012 3/18/2015 [Insert Federal Register 

citation].

Addressing the PSD permitting requirements of sections 

110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) 

(prong 3) and 110(a)(2)(J) only. 

110(a)(1) and (2) 

Infrastructure Requirements for 

the 2008 Ozone 

NAAQS.

Georgia .............................. 3/6/2012 3/18/2015 [Insert Federal Register 

citation].

Addressing the PSD permitting requirements of sections 

110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) 

(prong 3) and 110(a)(2)(J) only. 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 52 / Wednesday, March 18, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 14023 

EPA-APPROVED GEORGIA NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS—Continued 

Name of 

nonregulatory SIP 

provision 

Applicable geographic or 

nonattainment area 

State submittal 

date/effective 

date 

EPA Approval date Explanation 

110(a)(1) and (2) 

Infrastructure Requirements for 

the 2010 NO2

NAAQS.

Georgia .............................. 3/25/2013 3/18/2015 [Insert Federal Register 

citation].

Addressing the PSD permitting requirements of sections 

110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) 

(prong 3) and 110(a)(2)(J) only. 

Subpart S—Kentucky 

■ 5. Section 52.920(e), is amended by 

adding two new entries ‘‘110(a)(1) and 

(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 

2008 Lead NAAQS’’ and ‘‘110(a)(1) and 

(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 

2010 NO2 NAAQS’’ at the end of the 

table to read as follows: 

§ 52.920 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED KENTUCKY NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS

Name of 

non-regulatory 

SIP provision 

Applicable geographic or 

nonattainment area 

State submittal 

date/effective 

date 

EPA Approval date Explanations 

*******

110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 

Lead NAAQS.

Kentucky .................................... 7/17/2012 3/18/2015 [Insert 

Federal Register 

citation].

Addressing the PSD permitting requirements of sections 110(a)(2)(C), 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) and 

110(a)(2)(J) only 

110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 

NO2 NAAQS.

Kentucky .................................... 4/26/2013 3/18/2015 [Insert 

Federal Register 

citation].

Addressing the PSD permitting requirements of sections 110(a)(2)(C), 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) and 

110(a)(2)(J) only 

Subpart Z—Mississippi 

■ 6. Section 52.1270(e), is amended by 

adding three new entries for ‘‘110(a)(1) 

and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for 

the 2008 Lead NAAQS’’, ‘‘110(a)(1) and 

(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 

2008 Ozone NAAQS’’, and ‘‘110(a)(1) 

and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for 

the 2010 NO2 NAAQS’’ at the end of the 

table to read as follows: 

§ 52.1270 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED MISSISSIPPI NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS

Name of 

nonregulatory 

SIP provision 

Applicable geographic or 

nonattainment area 

State submittal 

date/effective 

date 

EPA Approval date Explanation 

*******

110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 

Lead NAAQS.

Mississippi .................................. 11/17/2011 3/18/2015 .................

[Insert Federal Register citation].

Addressing the PSD permitting requirements of sections 110(a)(2)(C), 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) and 

110(a)(2)(J) only. 

110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 

Ozone NAAQS.

Mississippi .................................. 5/29/2012 and 

amended on 

7/26/2012 

3/18/2015 .................

[Insert Federal Register citation].

Addressing the PSD permitting requirements of sections 110(a)(2)(C), 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) and 

110(a)(2)(J) only. 

110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 

NO2 NAAQS.

Mississippi .................................. 2/28/2013 3/18/2015 .................

[Insert Federal Register citation].

Addressing the PSD permitting requirements of sections 110(a)(2)(C), 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) and 

110(a)(2)(J) only. 

Subpart PP—South Carolina 

■ 7. Section 52.2120(e), is amended by 

adding three new entries for ‘‘110(a)(1) 

and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for 

the 2008 Lead NAAQS’’, ‘‘110(a)(1) and 

(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 

2008 Ozone NAAQS’’, and ‘‘110(a)(1) 

and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for 

the 2010 NO2 NAAQS’’ at the end of the 

table to read as follows: 

§ 52.2120 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
14024 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 52 / Wednesday, March 18, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

Provision State effective 

date EPA Approval date Explanation 

*******

110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure 

Requirements for the 2008 

Lead NAAQS.

9/20/2011 3/18/2015 ................................

[Insert Federal Register citation].

Addressing the PSD permitting requirements of sections 

110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) and 110(a)(2)(J) 

only. 

110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure 

Requirements for the 2008 

Ozone NAAQS.

7/17/2012 3/18/2015 ................................

[Insert Federal Register citation].

Addressing the PSD permitting requirements of sections 

110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) and 110(a)(2)(J) 

only. 

110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure 

Requirements for the 2010 

NO2 NAAQS.

4/30/2014 3/18/2015 ................................

[Insert Federal Register citation].

Addressing the PSD permitting requirements of sections 

110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) and 110(a)(2)(J) 

only. 

Subpart RR—Tennessee 

■ 8. Section 52.2220(e), is amended by 

adding a new entry for ‘‘110(a)(1) and 

(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 

2010 NO2 NAAQS’’ at the end of the 

table to read as follows: 

§ 52.2220 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED TENNESSEE NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS

Name of 

non-regulatory 

SIP provision 

Applicable geographic or 

nonattainment area 

State effective 

date EPA Approval date Explanation 

*******

110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 

NO2 NAAQS.

Tennessee ................................. 3/13/2014 3/18/2015 [Insert 

Federal Register 

citation].

Addressing the PSD permitting requirements of sections 110(a)(2)(C), 

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) and 

110(a)(2)(J) only. 

[FR Doc. 2015–06112 Filed 3–17–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0847; FRL–9923–63] 

2-Propenoic acid, polymer With 

ethenyl acetate, ethenylbenzene, 2- 

ethylhexyl 2-propenoate and ethyl 2- 

propenoate; Tolerance Exemption 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance for residues of 2-Propenoic 

acid, polymer with ethenyl acetate, 

ethenylbenzene, 2-ethylhexyl 2- 

propenoate and ethyl 2-propenoate; 

when used as an inert ingredient in a 

pesticide chemical formulation. BASF 

Corporation submitted a petition to EPA 

under the Federal Food, Drug, and 

Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance. This regulation eliminates the 

need to establish a maximum 

permissible level for residues of 2- 

Propenoic acid, polymer with ethenyl 

acetate, ethenylbenzene, 2-ethylhexyl 2- 

propenoate and ethyl 2-propenoate on 

food or feed commodities. 

DATES: This regulation is effective 

March 18, 2015. Objections and requests 

for hearings must be received on or 

before May 18, 2015, and must be filed 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also 

Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION). 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0874, is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 

Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) 

in the Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William 

Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 

20460–0001. The Public Reading Room 

is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OPP 

Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Lewis, Registration Division 

(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; main telephone 

number: (703) 305–7090; email address: 

RDFRNotices@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. The following 

list of North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) codes is 

not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 

provides a guide to help readers 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

B. How can I get electronic access to 

other related information? 

You may access a frequently updated 

electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 

through the Government Publishing 

Office’s e-CFR site at http://

www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/

40tab_02.tpl. 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES