alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries IV, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 4, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries IV, Inc.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Balchem  Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period  ended March 31,  2007 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Francis J.
Fitzpatrick,  Chief  Financial  Officer and  Treasurer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Francis J. Fitzpatrick
Francis J. Fitzpatrick
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)

May 10, 2007

This certification  accompanies the above-described Report on Form 10-Q pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the
extent  required  by such Act, be deemed  filed by the  Company for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


                                       35
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         57,768
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  77,461
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              187,565
<PP&E>                                        493,616
<DEPRECIATION>                                409,648
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                491,309
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         128,593
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                    15,400
<COMMON>                                      180,082
<OTHER-SE>                                   (596,510)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  491,309
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              324,286
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 948,090
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (570,115)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (570,115)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (570,115)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   ($.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   ($.03)







</TABLE>
#### Eddie J. LeBLANC v. AUDUBON INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 6375.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

March 7, 1978.

Donald Soileau, Mamou, and John A. Jeansonne, Jr., Lafayette, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Glenn W. Soileau, Breaux Bridge, A. Gaynor Soileau, Ville Platte, for defendants-appellees.

Before DOMENGEAUX, WATSON and GUIDRY, JJ.

WATSON, Judge.

The only issues are whether Rixby Manuel or the Evangeline Bank & Trust Company owed any duty to Eddie J. Le-Blanc, plaintiff, to renew his automobile insurance policy and whether the insurance policy issued by the Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company to the Evangeline Bank & Trust Company required Hartford to provide the bank with a defense to plaintiff’s suit.

These issues were resolved by the trial court against plaintiff and against Hartford. The trial court found that Manuel and the bank owed no duty to plaintiff to *30renew his insurance and further found that Manuel and the bank were not engaged, as “gestors” under the theory of negotiorum gestio, in managing the affairs of another as contemplated by LSA-C.C. art. 2295. Manuel and the bank were found to have renewed the policy previously to protect themselves, as they were entitled to do. It was held that plaintiff knew or should have known his vehicle was not insured and thus was at fault in failing to renew the policy. After reviewing the record, we find no manifest error in these conclusions.

As to Hartford’s obligation to defend the bank under its liability insurance policy, the only defense suggested is a policy exclusion which states in effect that the insurance does not apply to liability assumed by the bank under any contract or agreement. The applicable rule of law is that the insurer’s duty to defend its insured is determined by the allegations of the plaintiff’s petition, with the insurer being obligated to defend the lawsuit unless the petition unambiguously excludes coverage. *Benoit v. Fuselier,*195 So.2d 679 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1967). In paragraph 15 of plaintiff’s petition, it is alleged that the failure to renew was in part caused by the “acts, errors and omissions” (TR. 6) of the bank and this allegation is sufficient to require the insurer to defend. The trial court did not err in so concluding.

The bank’s attorney is entitled to an additional fee for services on appeal. In view of the fact that this matter was not argued orally, a fee of $300 would be appropriate.

Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed, except that an additional fee of $300 is awarded to counsel for the bank, representing services on appeal.

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that there be judgment in favor of Evangeline Bank & Trust Company and against Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company for the additional sum of $300 for attorney’s fees, representing services on appeal.

Costs of the appeal are taxed one-half against plaintiff, Eddie J. LeBlanc, and one-half against Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company.

AMENDED AND AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1416 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1416

To amend the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act to reauthorize the 
                  Interagency Council on Homelessness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 18, 2005

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act to reauthorize the 
                  Interagency Council on Homelessness.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Interagency Council on Homelessness 
Reauthorization Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 208 of the McKinney-
Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11318) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``1993'' and inserting ``2006''; and
            (2) by striking ``1994'' and inserting ``2007''.
    (b) Termination.--Section 209 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 11319) is 
amended by striking ``2005'' and inserting ``2007''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21995]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 2069-003, Arizona]


Arizona Public Service Company; Notice of Availability of Draft 
Environmental Assessment

August 14, 1997.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office 
of Hydropower Licensing has reviewed the application for relicense for 
the major, constructed Childs Irving Hydroelectric Project. The project 
is located on Fossil Creek, in Yavapai and Gila counties, Arizona. The 
Commission staff has prepared a Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) on 
the project. The DEA contains the staff's analysis of the environmental 
impacts of the project and has concluded that relicensing the project, 
with appropriate environmental enhancement measures, would not 
constitute a major federal action that would significantly affect the 
quality of the human environment.
    Copies of the DEA are available for review in the Public Reference 
Room, Room 2A, of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426.
    Any comments should be filed within 30 days from the date of this 
notice and should be addressed to Lois D. Cashell, Secretary, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426. For further information, contact Dianne Rodman, Environmental 
Coordinator, at (202) 219-2830.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21995 Filed 8-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-20298

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARISTEDE MICHAEL JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-96-CR-176-1

- - - - - - - - - -

June 16, 1998

Before DAVIS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Aristede Michael Johnson appeals his conviction under 18

U.S.C. § 924(c), using or carrying a firearm during the

commission of a crime of violence, on the ground that the

district court erred in instructing the jury that armed robbery

is a crime of violence. Because he raises this argument for the

first time on appeal, it is reviewed for plain error. United

States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en

banc). 
No. 97-20298

-2-

Johnson has not demonstrated plain error. His argument that

the district court’s instruction invaded the province of the jury

was specifically rejected by this court in United States v.

Credit, 95 F.3d 362, 364 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 117 S.

Ct. 1008 (1997)(the issue whether robbery is a crime of violence

within the meaning of § 924(c) is a question of law which should

not be submitted to the jury).

Johnson’s appeal is without arguable merit and is therefore

frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is dismissed. 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 99-30133

Summary Calendar

________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CLARENCE ALLEN MCHANNEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CR-10014-1

_________________________________________________________________

September 14, 1999

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Clarence

Allen McHanney has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

McHanney has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, and

he has filed a response. Our independent review of the brief,

the record, and his response discloses no nonfrivolous issue. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 
2

APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
# Donald V. Phillips

### Director, DLA Installation Management

### 

### 

Don Phillips began serving as Director of DLA Installation Management in March 2022. The Directorate consists of over 1,500 employees at 10 locations and is responsible for installation support activities including engineering; property accountability, environmental support; security and emergency services; process management and Family and Morale, Welfare and Recreation for the Defense Logistics Agency’s worldwide enterprise. A Pennsylvania native, Don received his commission through the US Army Reserve Officer Training Corps at Duke University in 1987. His military assignments included Operations Officer of the 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment in Fort Irwin, California, Professor of Military Science and Leadership at Western Michigan University and Chief, US Army Rapid Equipping Force, Baghdad, Iraq. Don retired from the Army in 2010 and joined DLA Disposition Services in Battle Creek, Michigan. There, he served in a variety of duties including Chief of Customer Support and Division Chief for Contingency Planning and Expeditionary Operations. Don deployed to Bagram, Afghanistan in support of Operation Enduring Freedom providing disposal support for north and central Afghanistan. From 2015 to 2019, he served as the Director of Installation Management at Battle Creek supporting DLA employees within the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center and at over 100 DLA Disposition Services activities worldwide. Don is a 2019 distinguished graduate of the Eisenhower School of National Security and Resource Strategy with a concentration in Long Term Strategy. He is also a graduate of the Federal Executive Institute, the Naval Supply Corps Advanced Management Program and the Leading Strategically Program. Don holds bachelors degrees in zoology and history and masters degrees in Military Arts and Sciences and National Resource Strategy. His awards and decorations include the Combat Action Badge, the Legion of Merit, the Bronze Star with Oak Leaf Cluster, the Douglas MacArthur Leadership Award, the Australian Chief of Defense Commendation and the DLA Meritorious Civilian Service Award. Don is married to Evelyn Lionel Phillips. They have three adult children and one grandchild.
### Assessment of undiscovered conventionally recoverable petroleum resources of the Northwest European region

By: Charles D. MastersH. Douglas Klemme

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir922A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gregory D. Waller, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Gregory D. Waller

Gregory D. Waller
Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc. and will be retained by Sybron
Dental Specialties, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


                                       41
#### John W. SHIELDS, Appellant, v. James E. MOORE, Jr., Appellee.

No. 77-1205.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 22, 1977.

*140John D. Prior, Jr., Sunrise, for appellant.

No briefs filed by appellee.

LETTS, Judge.

The trial court reinstated an action pursuant to Rule 1.420(e) Fla.R.Civ.P. We reverse.

This cause was set for trial on January 21st, 1976 and postponed upon request of the plaintiff until “renotice by either party” by order dated January 19th, 1976.

On April 5, 1977 the trial court sua sponte moved the dismissal of the action pursuant to Rule 1.420(e) Fla.R.Civ.P., Failure to Prosecute.

The only evidence in the record pertinent to “good cause” is the bare assertion by plaintiff’s counsel that the delay “is not the fault of the plaintiff” and that the plaintiff had “been (in) communication with the Department of Transportation *(not*the defendant) with regard to determining the assets of the defendant”.

We are of the opinion that such explanations do not constitute good cause. True, we are not privy to what other cause the plaintiff may have expressed orally at the hearing on the reinstatement, but the rule unequivocally requires that the good cause be in writing at least five days before the hearing. See *Koppers Co., Inc. v. Victoire Development Corp.,*284 So.2d 193 (Fla. 1973).

We therefore reverse the order of reinstatement and direct that the case be dismissed under the authority of *Laug v. Murphy,*205 So.2d 695 (Fla. 4DCA 1968).

REVERSED.

CROSS and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
---------------------------
Certified Public Accountant

                                                  330 E. Warm Springs
                                                 Las Vegas, NV  89119
                                                         702.528.1984
                                                  425.928.2877 (efax)


May 7, 2001


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of G. Brad Beckstead, CPA, consents to the inclusion of my report
of May 7, 2001, on the Financial Statements of General Telephony.com,
Inc. for the three months ending March 31, 2001, in any filings which are
necessary now or in the near future to be filed with the US Securities and
Exchange Commission.

Signed,

/s/ G. Brad Beckstead
--------------------------
    G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energy & Engine Technology
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Willard G. McAndrew, III, CEO and President of
the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.

/s/ Willard G. McAndrew, III
Willard G. McAndrew, III
Chief Executive Officer

August 16, 2004



































                                       30
# DLA honors D-Day anniversary, sacrifices

/ Published June 6, 2017

June 6, 2017, marks the 73rd anniversary of D-Day, when the Allies stormed the beaches at Normandy, France, to spark the beginning of victory in Europe.

Thousands of soldiers, sailors, airmen and U.S. Marines were killed by German machine-gun nests, mortar shells, and anti-aircraft fire. Still others drowned in the English Channel, weighed down by wet clothing and heavy equipment.

The Defense Logistics Agency salutes their bravery and remembers their sacrifice, which led to the beginning of the end of World War II.

For additional history, photos and figures, see the Department of Defense D-Day 2017 observance page.