alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Schlemmer , Kevi n (OST) From : Da n an d Dian a Mitchel l [dmitchx4@verizon.net ] Sent : Tuesday , Jul y13 , 201 0 10:2 4 A M To : EA S (OST ) Subject : Venang o Regiona l Airpor t
Mr
. DeVany , I recentl y hear drumor s in th e communit y abou t th e possibl e closur e of

Venang o Regiona l Airport du e t o th e DO T re-evaluatin g th e EAS
. I hop e that thi s doe s not

happe n an dit

woul db e devastatin g t o th e area . Man y peopl e rel y o n thi s service , especiall y th e elderly , sinc e thi s save s the mfro mhavin g t o trave l t o Pittsburgh , Erie , o r Cleveland
. Thi s i s agodsen despeciall y i n th e winte r months
. I hop e an dpra y that yo u wil l conside r

th e community an dth e live s that it wil l effect , whe n yo u mak e you r decisio n abou t

th e airport
. Than k

you . Dian aMitchel l

C 3
# David R. Kless

### Deputy Commander, DLA Energy

### 

### 

David R. Kless is the Deputy Commander, Defense Logistics Agency Energy, located at Fort Belvoir, VA. Mr. Kless enables mission readiness by providing globally resilient energy solutions (from fuel for airplanes, ships, and equipment, to rocket propellants, cryogens, alternative energy, natural gas, and electricity) to the DOD and other government agencies.

Prior to his current position, Mr. Kless served as the Executive Director, DLA Operations, responsible for coordinating and synchronizing DLA’s day-to-day worldwide logistics, acquisition, and technical support services in support of combatant commands, military services, federal, state, and civil agencies and foreign governments.

Mr. Kless was selected into the Senior Executive Service in 2018. He has over 34 years in combined military and civilian service. He served in the U.S. Navy performing multiple logistics and operational assignments within the logistics and acquisition communities. As a civilian, Mr. Kless served DLA as the Division Chief for Whole of Government Support in Logistics Operations and later as DLA’s Deputy Chief of Staff.

Mr. Kless holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Political Science from the U.S. Naval Academy, Master of Science degree in Operations Research from the Navy Postgraduate School and Master of Arts degree in National Security and Strategic Studies from the U.S. Naval War College. He is certified as an Acquisition Professional after successfully completing certification requirements at Life Cycle Logistics Advanced.

Mr. Kless’ awards include the Exceptional Civilian Service Award and three Meritorious Civilian Service Awards. His military awards include Defense Superior Service Medal; Meritorious Service Medal, two awards; Best Retail Sales and Service Award; Navy and Marine Association Peer Selected Leadership Award; Navy Battle Efficiency Award; Admiral Stanley R. Arthur Award for Logistics Excellence; and Navy & Marine Corps Commendation Medal, four awards.
#### Theo MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 75-781.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 21, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 16, 1977.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and James R. Merola, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, ALDERMAN, and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 135 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 135

 To amend the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to expand country of 
    origin labeling for certain covered commodities, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2005

  Mr. Burns (for himself, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. 
 Thune, and Mr. Dorgan) introduced the following bill; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and 
                                Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to expand country of 
    origin labeling for certain covered commodities, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROCESSED FOOD ITEMS.

    Section 281(2)(B) of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 
U.S.C. 1638(2)(B)) is amended by inserting ``clause (iii), (iv), (v), 
or (vi) of'' before ``subparagraph (A)''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    Section 285 of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 
1638d) is amended by striking ``2006'' and inserting ``2005''.

SEC. 3. REGULATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture shall promulgate 
such regulations as are necessary to carry out the amendment made by 
section 1.
    (b) Final Rule.--Nothing in this Act requires the Secretary to 
delay the publication of final regulations under section 284(b) of the 
Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1638c(b)).
                                 <all>
```
No. 00-713.

#### Sarno et al. *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Amended and Restated Plan of Recapitalization



 Exhibit 4.1    Amended and Restated Plan of Recapitalization 
 Amended and Restated Plan of Recapitalization 
 Speedemissions, Inc. has adopted the following plan of recapitalization to be effective as of the close of Business on October 12, 2007: 
 (a) Existing Common Stock Purchase Warrant “A” issued to Barron Partners LP for 2,621,496 shares of Common Stock, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A, will be surrendered and exchanged for Common
Stock Purchase Warrant “AA-1” for 2,621,496 shares of Common Stock in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B. 
 (b) Existing
Common Stock Purchase Warrant “B” issued to Barron Partners LP for 1,965,935 shares of Common Stock, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit C, will be surrendered and exchanged for (i) Common Stock Purchase Warrant
“AA-2” for 1,574,314 shares of Common stock in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D, (ii) Common Stock Purchase Warrant “AA-3” for 195,810 shares of Common stock in the form attached hereto as Exhibit E, and
(iii); Common Stock Purchase Warrant “AA-4” for 195,811 shares of Common stock in the form attached hereto as Exhibit F. 
 (c) Existing Common Stock Purchase Warrant “C” issued to Barron Partners LP for 4,000,000 shares of Common Stock, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit G, will be surrendered and exchanged for Common Stock Purchase Warrant
“AA-5” for 4,000,000 shares of Common Stock in the form attached hereto as Exhibit H. 
 (d) Existing Common Stock Purchase
Warrant for 4,000,000 shares of Common Stock issued to Barron Partners LP, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit I, will be surrendered and exchanged for Common Stock Purchase Warrant “AA-6” for 4,000,000 shares of Common Stock in
the form attached hereto as Exhibit J. 
 (e) Existing Common Stock Purchase Warrant for 2,400,000 shares of Common Stock issued to
Global Capital Funding Group, L.P., a copy of which is attached as Exhibit K, will be surrendered and exchanged for (i) Common Stock Purchase Warrant “AA-7” for 800,000 shares of Common Stock in the form attached hereto as
Exhibit L, (ii) Common Stock Purchase Warrant “AA-8” for 800,000 shares of Common Stock in the form attached hereto as Exhibit M, and (iii) Common Stock Purchase Warrant “AA-8” for 800,000 shares of Common
Stock in the form attached hereto as Exhibit N. 
 (f) Except as specifically provided for otherwise in this Plan of Recapitalization,
there are no changes to any other securities of the Company which have been issued, or authorized but unissued, and each and every certificate representing one or more securities of the Company which has been issued immediately prior to the taking
effect of the Plan shall thereafter represent the same security immediately after the taking effect of the Plan.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The year in trade [electronicresource]: operation of the trade agreements program during ... /**
 
1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017
 
SuDoc Number:ITC 1.24:
Item Number:0980-A (online)
CGP systemNumber:000559730
 
September 19, 2019
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 158 (Friday, August 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43738-43739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21650]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration
[Document Identifier: HCFA-2384]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Health Care Financing Administration.
    In compliance with the requirement of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Health Care Financing 
Administration (HCFA), Department of Health and Human Services, is 
publishing the following summary of proposed collections for public 
comment. Interested persons are invited to send comments regarding this 
burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, 
including any of the following subjects: (1) The necessity and utility 
of the proposed information collection for the proper performance of 
the agency's functions; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) 
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to 
be collected; and (4) the use of automated collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology to minimize the information 
collection burden.
    Type of Information Collection Request: Reinstatement, without 
change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has 
expired; Title of Information Collection: Third Party Premium Billing 
Request and Supporting Regulations in 42 CFR 408.6; Form No.: HCFA-2384 
(OMB 0938-0041); Use: The Third Party Premium Billing Request is used 
as an authorization form to designate that a family member or other 
interested party

[[Page 43739]]

receive the Medicare premium bill and pay it on behalf of a Medicare 
beneficiary. Frequency: On occasion; Affected Public: Individuals or 
Households; Number of Respondents: 15,000; Total Annual Responses: 
15,000; Total Annual Hours: 6,250.
    To obtain copies of the supporting statement and any related forms 
for the proposed paperwork collections referenced above, E-mail your 
request, including your address and phone number, to 
P<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1372637661647c6178537b7075723d747c65"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="37564752454058455c775f54515619505841">[email protected]</span></a>, or call the Reports Clearance Office on (410) 786-
1326. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collections must be mailed within 30 days of this notice directly to 
the OMB desk officer: OMB Human Resources and Housing Branch, 
Attention: Allison Eydt, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 
Washington, D.C. 20503.

    Dated: August 5, 1997.
John P. Burke III,
HCFA Reports Clearance Officer, Division of HCFA Enterprise Standards, 
Health Care Financing Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-21650 Filed 8-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-03-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

          Certification of CEO and CFO Respecting Financial Disclosure.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. (S)1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Ironstone Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert H.
Hambrecht, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                             /s/Robert H. Hambrecht
                             ------------------------------
                             Robert H. Hambrecht
                             Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
                             March 30, 2004
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 Date: March 29, 2006
    /s/  Robert H. HambrechtName:
    Robert H. HambrechtTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
Sky Guardian LLC

Unmanned Aerial Solutions

P.O. Box 1074. Bisbee, AZ 85603

WWW.SKYGUARDIAN.ORG

January 25, 2016

RE: Exemption No. 11604 Regulator Docket No. FAA-2015-0514

U.S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Ave. S.W.

Washington D. C. 20591

Sir,

Sky Guardian L.L.C would like to amend our Exemption to include two items. The first item we 

would like to amend is the addition of the Action Drone 2 (AD2). The AD-2 is a quadcopter with 

the same operating functions as the AD-1 and AD-Talon. Attached is the Spec sheet for this 

aircraft.

The second item we would like to add is the authorization to provide training to Government 

agencies and private organizations. Training would be conducted for 1 or more days with a 

Basic Operator course, Basic System course, Basic Operator course recurrent training, Advance

courses, Exemption-333 and Certificates of Authorization. Our training outline would meet or 

exceed current FAA requirements. Our curriculum will cover Private Pilot Ground, Sport Pilot 

Ground, UAS/UAV Ground and UAS/UAV Systems. Clients will be trained in Airman’s Knowledge 

and receive flight time. Our training can be adapted to meet new FAA regulations and testing 

standards for Exemption 333 applicants, flight and non-flight (Controllers, data link video 

equipment) as needed. CFI instructors and additional staff would provide instruction. 

Additionally we request that Mobile Training Teams (MTTs) be authorized to provide training at 

governmental or private industrial organizations sites which would be cost effective for our 

clients. MTT Training will cover the same materials as training received at our home location.

Respectfully Submitted,
#### Walter Lee ALLS, a minor, by his father and next friend, Monroe Alls, and Monroe Alls, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. 7-ELEVEN FOOD STORES, INC., and Crystal Springs Water Company, a division of Borden, Inc., Defendants.

No. 77-2325.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 20, 1977.

*203Kuvin, Klingensmith & Lewis and R. Fred Lewis, Coconut Grove, Gaine & Gaine, Miami, for plaintiffs.

Adams, George, Schulte & Ward, Miami, for defendants.

Before NATHAN, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

A judge of the circuit court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida has certified a question of law to this court pursuant to Fla.App. Rule 4.6, to wit:

> “Whether a defendant against whom a default judgment has been entered may assert non-liability by means of a liability defense which has been the basis of the entry of a summary judgment in favor of a separate defendant, not in default, and when the defense is the total negligence of the plaintiff as the sole proximate cause of the accident?”

In common with many legal issues, the question as certified is a difficult one but not without controlling precedent in this state. Where there is such controlling precedent, this court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the certified question and must respectfully decline to answer it. See: *Schwob Co. of Florida v. Florida Industrial Commission,*152 Fla. 203, 11 So.2d 782, 783 (1942); *State v. Vernon,*289 So.2d 754 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974); *Reaves v. L. W. Rozzo, Inc.,*286 So.2d 221 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).

Certified question denied.
EXHIBIT 14 (a)

                               STATE BANCORP, INC.

        Code of Ethics for Chief Executive and Senior Financial Officers

State Bancorp's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics includes a set of business
values which guide all of our decisions and behavior.

State Bancorp's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to all directors and
employees of State Bancorp, Inc. and its direct and indirect subsidiaries
(collectively "the Company"), including the Chief Executive Officer and other
senior financial officers. In addition to being bound by the Code's provisions
about ethical conduct, conflicts of interest and compliance with law, we have
adopted the following Code of Ethics specifically for our Chief Executive and
senior financial officers.

     1. You are responsible for full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable
financial disclosure in reports and documents filed by the Company with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and in other public communications made by
the Company. The company's accounting records must be maintained in accordance
with all applicable laws, must be proper, supported and classified, and must not
contain any false or misleading entries.

     2. You are responsible for the Company's system of internal financial
controls. You shall promptly bring to the attention of the Audit Committee any
information you may have concerning (a) significant deficiencies in the design
or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data, or (b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Company's financial reporting, disclosures or
internal controls.

     3. You may not compete with the Company and may never let business dealings
on behalf of the Company be influenced - or even appear to be influenced - by
personal or family interests. You shall promptly bring to the attention of the
Audit Committee any information you may have concerning any actual or apparent
conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships, involving
any management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
financial reporting, disclosures or internal controls.

     4. The Company is committed to complying with both the letter and the
spirit of all applicable laws, rules and regulations. You shall promptly bring
to the attention of the Audit Committee any information you may have concerning
evidence of a material violation of the securities or other laws, rules or
regulations applicable to the Company or its employees or agents. You shall
promptly bring to the attention of the Audit Committee any information you may
have concerning any violation of this Code. The Board of Directors may
determine, or designate appropriate persons to determine, appropriate additional
disciplinary or other actions to be taken in the event of violations of this
Code of Ethics by the Company's Chief Executive or senior financial officers and
a procedure for granting any waivers of this Code.
Before the First Division,

June 13, 1951

No. 55667.

#### Mary M. Pollay *v.*United States,

petition 6714-R (Milwaukee).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

No evidence having been presented to the court upon which a finding such as is required under section 489, *supra,*may. be made, the petition was dismissed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

___________________________________ 

 ) 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 v. ) 

 ) Criminal No. 95-0088-2 (PLF) 

PERCY BARRON, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

___________________________________ ) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 

 Pending before the Court is defendant Percy Barron’s Motion Requesting for This 

Court to Court Order the Bureau of Prisons to Transfer Him to Springfield MCFP in Springfield, 

Missouri (“Def. Mot.”) [Dkt. No. 564]. 

 On July 22, 2020, this Court denied Mr. Barron’s motion for compassionate 

release, but stated that it was inclined “to recommend to the BOP that Mr. Barron be 

transferred . . . because of his underlying medical conditions which make him more susceptible 

to COVID-19.” Memorandum Opinion and Order [Dkt. No. 547] at 3. Accordingly, the Court 

ordered that Mr. Barron “advise the Court via supplemental filing whether Mr. Barron still 

requests a recommendation for transfer and to which medical center.” Id. at 4. On 

August 5, 2020, in light of Mr. Barron’s supplemental filing indicating that he wished to be 

transferred to Springfield, the Court “recommended to the Bureau of Prisons that Mr. Barron be 

transferred to Springfield MCFP in Springfield, Missouri.” Memorandum Opinion and Order 

[Dkt. No. 551] at 2. 

 Mr. Barron, through his pending motion, indicates that USP McCreary has 

reviewed the recommendation of this Court, along with his current medical records, and 
2

determined that Mr. Barron does not, at this time, meet the requirement for a medical transfer. 

Def. Mot. at 3. For this reason, Mr. Barron now requests a binding order from the Court that he 

be transferred to Springfield MCFP in Springfield, Missouri. Id. at 4. 

The Court, in indicating its willingness to make a recommendation for transfer, 

made clear that “Section 3621(b) of Title 18 of the United States Code vests final authority to 

determine a defendant’s place of incarceration with the BOP.” Memorandum Opinion and Order 

[Dkt. No. 547] at 3. As such, the Court may only recommend the defendant’s placement in a 

particular facility, and “any recommendation by the Court to the BOP [is] purely advisory.” 

United States v. Crawford, 312 F. Supp. 3d 31, 35 (D.D.C. 2018). Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED that defendant Percy Barron’s Motion Requesting for This Court to 

Court Order the Bureau of Prisons to Transfer Him to Springfield MCFP in Springfield, Missouri 

[Dkt. No. 564] is DENIED. 

 PAUL L. FRIEDMAN 

 United States District Judge 

DATE: January 5, 2021 

/s/