alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BAJAMAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. COPLAN PIPE & SUPPLY CO., INC., a Florida Corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 76-1812.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 11, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 16, 1977.

Gilbride & Heller and James F. Gilbride, Miami, King & Katz, Hialeah, for appellant.

Kavanaugh & Leiby and Larry R. Leiby, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber,*143 So.2d 849 (Fla.1962); *GACL, Inc. v. Zeger,*276 So.2d 552 (Fla. 3d *71DCA 1973); and *Bay Products Corp. v. Winters,*341 So.2d 240 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).
WATERFOWL HUNTING AREAS

| OREDGE SPOR. SITE .

Gut 8
Intracoastal Waterway

BIG BOGGY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE y
MATAGORDA COUNTY, TEXAS o«

Dressing
Pont.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21348]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Notice of Intent To Issue a Prospectus for the Operation of Hotel 
and Related Facilities in Sequoia National Park

SUMMARY: The National Park Service is seeking to award a concession 
contract for the operation and construction of new visitor facilities 
and continued operation of certain existing facilities within Sequoia 
National Park, which is part of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National 
Parks. The contract will be awarded on a fully competitive basis. The 
Prospectus which describes the project is expected to be issued within 
a few weeks. Interested parties should place their names on the mailing 
list to be sent the Prospectus.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The development to be constructed includes 
as many as 414 guest units, along with food service and other related 
commercial and support facilities. Extensive site preparation, roads, 
parking and other infrastructure work have already been completed by 
the government. The site has a panoramic view from the western face of 
the Sierra Nevada. To discuss the proposed development, interested 
parties should call Ms. Peggy Williams, Chief, Concession Program 
Management, Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, (209) 565-3103.
    The cost for purchasing a Prospectus is $30.00. Parties interested 
in obtaining a copy should send a check, NO CASH, payable to ``National 
Park Service'' to the following address: Pacific Great Basin Support 
Office, National Park Service, 600 Harrison Street, Suite 600, San 
Francisco, California 94107-1372, Attention: Office of Concession 
Program Management ``Mail Room Do Not Open''.
    Please include a mailing address indicating where to send the 
Prospectus. Address inquiries to Ms. Teresa Jackson, Secretary, Office 
of Concession Program Management at (415) 427-1369.

    Dated: July 11, 1997.
John J. Reynolds,
Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 97-21348 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
Back to Contents

**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher G. Clement, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |

|   | By: /s/ Christopher G. Clement               Christopher G. ClementPresident and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

March 28, 2006

----
PUBLIC LAW 110–444—OCT. 21, 2008 122 STAT. 5009 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6834: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Sept. 27, considered and passed House. 

Oct. 2, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–444 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4 South 

Main Street in Wallingford, Connecticut, as the ‘‘CWO Richard R. Lee Post 

Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CWO RICHARD R. LEE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 4 South Main Street in Wallingford, Connecticut, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘CWO Richard R. Lee Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘CWO Richard R. Lee Post Office Building’’. 

Approved October 21, 2008. 

Oct. 21, 2008 

[H.R. 6834] 


bjneal on POFP91QD1 with PUBLAWS
PUBLIC LAW 110–368—OCT. 8, 2008 122 STAT. 4027 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6946: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Sept. 25, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 27, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–368 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To make a technical correction in the NET 911 Improvement Act of 2008. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION. 

(a) AMENDMENT.—Section 6(c)(1)(C) of the Wireless Communications and Public Safety Act of 1999 (47 U.S.C. 615a–1(c)(1)(C)) 

is amended by striking ‘‘paragraph (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph 

(3)’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a) 

shall take effect as of July 23, 2008, immediately after the enactment of the NET 911 Improvement Act of 2008 (Public Law 110– 

283). 

Approved October 8, 2008. 

47 USC 615a–1 

note. 

Oct. 8, 2008 

[H.R. 6946] 


kgrant on POHRRP4G1 with PUBLAW
EX-10.2



 






EXHIBIT 10.2




Extension of Location Rental Agreement




Dear Martha:



We write with respect to that certain Location Rental Agreement (the “Agreement”) by and between
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. (“MSLO”), a Delaware corporation, and you, entered into as of
September 17, 2004.



We acknowledge that the Agreement is scheduled to expire by its terms on September 17, 2007. We
also acknowledge that the Agreement will be replaced by an Intangible Asset License Agreement.
Notwithstanding the expiration of the Agreement and pending the negotiation of the Intangible Asset
License Agreement, MSLO agrees to pay you the Enhanced Payment Amount, described in the
second-numbered paragraph of the Agreement, on September 17, 2007 (the “Payment”) in order
to continue to have access to the Real Property. MSLO’s use of the Real Property following the
term will be consistent with the historic practices between you, your company, MSRE, and MSLO.



MSLO looks forward to good faith negotiations with you regarding the Intangible Asset License
Agreement, beginning promptly. MSLO considers the Payment a payment to allow for continued access
to the Real Property pending the finalization and execution of the new agreement. The Payment
shall not be construed as the satisfaction of any other obligations MSLO has to you under any other
agreement or arrangement. Nothing contained herein shall in any way compromise the rights of the
parties with respect to future negotiations and/or prior agreements or arrangements.



Please acknowledge your understanding and acceptance of these terms by executing below where
indicated and returning a copy to us.




Best regards,




/s/ Howard Hochhauser




Howard Hochhauser

Chief Financial Officer




Agreed to, acknowledged and accepted:




	 	 	 
	/s/ Martha Stewart
	 	 
	 

Martha Stewart
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 160 (Tuesday, August 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44156-44157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21895]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-483]


Callaway Plant; Intent to Relocate Local Public Document Room

    Notice is hereby given that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) 
will be relocating the local public document room (LPDR) for records 
pertaining to Union Electric Company's Callaway Plant, Unit 1. The 
Callaway LPDR is currently located at the Callaway County Public 
Library, 710 Court Street, Fulton, Missouri. Library staff recently 
informed the NRC that they are no longer able to maintain the document 
collection and request that it be moved. This notice invites public 
comment on possible LPDR locations in the Callaway County, Missouri, 
area.
    Among the factors the NRC will consider in selecting a new location 
for the LPDR are the following:
    (1) Whether the institution is an established document repository 
located near the nuclear facility with a history of impartially serving 
the public;
    (2) The physical facilities available, including shelf space, 
storage space, patron workspace, copying equipment and computer access;
    (3) The willingness and ability of the library staff to maintain 
the LPDR collection and assist the public in locating records;
    (4) The nature and extent of related research resources, such as 
government documents;
    (5) The public accessibility of the library, including handicap 
accessibility, parking, ground transportation, and hours of operation, 
particularly evening and weekend hours;

[[Page 44157]]

    (6) The proximity of the library to existing user groups of the 
collection, if known.
    Comment period expires September 19, 1997. Comments received after 
this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but assurance 
of consideration cannot be given except as to comments filed on or 
before this date.
    Written comments may be submitted to Mr. David Meyer, Chief, 
Regulatory Publications Branch, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555. Copies of comments 
received may be examined at the NRC Public Document Room, Gelman 
Building, 2120 L Street NW, Washington, DC.
    Questions concerning the NRC's LPDR Program should be addressed to 
Ms. Jona L. Souder, LPDR Program Manager, Freedom of Information/Local 
Public Document Room Branch, Office of Information Resources 
Management, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, 
telephone number 301-415-7170, or toll-free 1-800-638-8081.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day of August, 1997.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Russell A. Powell,
Chief, Freedom of Information/Local Public Document Room Branch, Office 
of Information Resources Management.
[FR Doc. 97-21895 Filed 8-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Mapping Customer Training

Email this event to me @

Invalid Email Address!Invalid Email Address!

Start Date/Time:

Monday, August 5, 2024 1:30 PM(UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

End Date/Time:

Monday, August 5, 2024 2:30 PM(UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

Recurring Event:

One time event

Importance:

Normal Priority

Category:

DLA Aviation Mapping

Description:

Enter event description

Enrolled Users:

                - Return
                - 
                - Export
#### Emilio Vergini et al. *v.*United States

No. 8124.

Entry No. 338, etc.

(Decided June 5, 1952)

*Wallace & Schwartz (Joseph Schwartz*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between *the attorneys for the*parties hereto:

> That the merchandise covered by appeals to reappraisement set forth in Schedule A, hereto annexed and made a part of this stipulation, consists of certain accordions, accordion reeds and concertina reeds exported from Italy.

> That on or about the dates of exportation of such merchandise, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of Italy in *the*usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course *of*trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States at the entered values, less the amount added under duress.

> That on or about the dates of exportation, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption in Italy or, if so offered, the price for home consumption was no higher.

> That the appeals to reappraisement set forth in the attached schedule be submitted on this stipulation.

*671On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the entered values, less the amount added under duress.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Order entered October 4, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00307-CV

THIEN AN VO, Appellant

V.

HARRIS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 133rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-72816

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this appeal is missing the record of a proceeding 

held May 11, 2021, although we have twice ordered Darlene Stein, Official Court 

Reporter for the 133rd Judicial District Court, to file it. Accordingly, we ORDER 

Ms. Stein to file the record, or written verification no record of that proceeding 

exists, no later than October 14, 2021. We caution Ms. Stein that failure to 

comply may result in an order directing the trial court to hold a hearing to 

determine why she has failed to comply.
We note a supplemental clerk’s record appellant requested on or about 

August 28, 2021 has also not been filed. Accordingly, we ORDER Harris County 

District Clerk Marilyn Burgess to file the supplemental clerk’s record no later 

than October 14, 2021.

Appellant’s brief will be due within thirty days after the later of the date the 

supplemental clerk’s record, reporter’s record, or requested verification is filed.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to the 

Honorable Jaclanel McFarland, Presiding Judge of the 133rd Judicial District 

Court; Ms. Burgess; Ms. Stein; and, the parties.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
#### DUVAL COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Appellant, v. Douglass Ryan COOKE, Appellee.

No. HH-74.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 17, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 15, 1977.

Dawson A. McQuaig and William Lee Allen, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Lacy Mahon, Jr., of Mahon, Farley & Vickers, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We treat the Duval County School Board’s appeal, styled interlocutory appeal, as petition for writ of certiorari. No grounds having been asserted by the Board for issuance of the writ, the petition for writ of certiorari is

DENIED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
#### SMITH v. BARNCASTLE.

March 30, 1837.

*Rule to show cause why the fieri facias should not be set a,side.*

The act of 16th June, 1836, relating to executions, which provides that the stay of execution shall be computed from *the first day of the term*to which the suit is brought, does not repeal the first section of the act of 28th March, 1835, which directs that the stay shall be counted from the *return day*of the original process.

THIS action was brought to September term, 1836, returnable on the October return day. After judgment, defendant *75entered security for stay of execution for six months. The plaintiff issued a fieri facias to March term, 1837, six months having elapsed counting from the first Monday of September, 1838, but there was not a lapse of that time counting from the return day of the original writ.

Defendant obtained this rule to show causa

Taylor, for the rula

*Fallon,*contra.

It was contended by defendant’s counsel that the *cessel*ran from the 1st Monday of October, 1837, under the act of 28th March, 1835, § 1, which directs that the stay of execution shall count from the return day of the original process. ::

The plaintiff’s counsel contended that by the act of 16th June, 1836, the stay of execution should be computed from the first day of the term to which the action was brought

Per Curiam,

The act of 1836, relating to executions, has no repealing clause either express or qualified. The provision in question is not so inconsistent with the aet of 1835 that both cannot stand together. The provision of the act of 1835 is restricted to this court, and is adapted to its peculiar system of monthly return days. The section of the act of 1836 refers to the general organization of the courts of the commonwealth. By applying each clause to its appropriate object, entire harmony of construction is preserved. So far from being repugnant, each clause has full scope for its proper operation. The rule “ *quod posteriores leges priores contrarias abrogante*does not apply. *The fieri facias*must be set aside.

Rule absolute.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

#  All Grown-Up: DLA Child Development Center has its first set of high school graduates

By Amanda NeumannDLA Public Affairs

                Fort Belvoir, Virginia  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

child development centerCDCchild careDLA
Compensation Letter between the Registrant and Richard T. Geraffo, Jr.



 Exhibit 10.13 
  

			
	 BEA Systems, Inc.
	  	2315 North First Street
		  	San Jose, California 95131
		  	Telephone: +1.408.570.8000
		  	Facsimile: +1.408.570.8901
		  	www.bea.com

 

 
 April 25, 2007 
 Rich Gerrafo

 2315 N. First Street 
 San Jose, CA 95110 
 RE: FY08 Compensation Awards 
 Dear Rich: 
 I am happy to advise you that the Compensation Committee has approved the following FY08 Cash and Equity Rewards in recognition of your contributions over the last
fiscal year. 
 Base Salary and Bonus Potential 
 Effective May 1, 2007, your new annual base salary will be $450,000, payable in accordance with our regular payroll cycle. This represents a 24% adjustment. Your target bonus will be 75% of your base salary in accordance with our FY08
Executive Staff Bonus Plan. The Plan document will be sent under separate cover. Thus, your On-Target-Earnings (OTE) will be $787,500. 
 You will also have
the opportunity to earn an additional bonus of $250,000 outside your standard variable compensation package. Half of the amount would be in the form of a performance bonus if you over achieve your license booking for the year. For over 100%
achievement you would receive a bonus in the amount of $75,000, with an additional $10,000 for every additional percent over achievement, not to exceed a total of $125,000. The second half would be a retention bonus with a one year earn out equal to
$125,000 to be paid 05/1/ 2008. 
 Equity 
 The
Compensation Committee also approved the granting of a Non-Qualified Stock Option to purchase 150,000 shares of Company common stock with our standard 4 year vesting for options as well as 50,000 Restricted Stock Units
(RSU’s) with our standard 4 year vesting for RSUs. The option will be granted in accordance with our standard equity granting practices as soon as practicable following the Q1 FY08 earnings announcement. The RSUs will be granted in accordance
with our standard equity granting practices as soon as practicable after the Company becomes current in filing its financial statements with the SEC. 
 Rich, I deeply appreciate your contributions and look forward to FY08 with optimism and excitement. Thanks for all of your hard work! 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	Alfred