alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### William E. FREBER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1483.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 1, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 13, 1977.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Frank B. Kessler and James K. Green, Asst. Public Defenders, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Marsha G. Madorsky, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

The Defendant was convicted of breaking and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor. At trial the eyewitness did not identify the Defendant as the person who committed the breaking and entering and *107two deputies were called to testify that the eyewitness did identify the Defendant at the scene as the perpetrator. The facts of this case are thus quite similar to those set out in *Laws v. State*(Fla.4th DCA 1977), Case No. 76-1544, Opinion on Petition for Rehearing issued September 6, 1977. The only material difference is that the Defendant timely objected to the hearsay testimony of the deputies and that causes us to reverse the conviction. See *Laws,*supra; *Willis v. State,*217 So.2d 106 (Fla. 1968); *Willis v. State,*208 So.2d 458 (Fla.1st DCA 1968); *Johnson v. State,*249 So.2d 452 (Fla.4th DCA 1971). The Judgment and Sentence are reversed and this cause is remanded for new trial in accordance with this opinion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and ANSTEAD, J., concur.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION Ill 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

E. Christopher Abruzzo, Secretary 

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection 

Rachel Carson State Office Building 

P. 0. Box 2063 

Harrisburg, P A 17105-2063 

Dear Secretary Abruzzo: 

AUG - 7 2014 

On July 17, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the 

Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Pennsylvania Department of the Environment 

pertaining to several infrastructure elements applicable to the 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide NAAQS. EPA has 

determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare 

a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR) action. 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Ruth Knapp, Office of 

"Air Program Planning, at (215) 814-2191, or at knapp.ruth@epa.gov. She is the principal contact for 

this rulemaking. 

Sincerely, !' ~ 

~£!~/ Air Protection Division 

,., 

t.J Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free. 

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 Form 10-KSB/A
 Amendment No. 1
 þ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from to
 Commission file number
000-11284
 Silicon Mountain Holdings, Inc.
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Colorado(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    84-0910490(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 4755 Walnut Street, Boulder Colorado 80301  (Address of principal executive offices)
 (303) 938-1155  (Registrants telephone number)
   þ o
  o o þ
 o þ




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  SIGNATURESExhibit IndexCertification Pursuant to Section 302Certification Pursuant to Section 302    Table of Contents  Explanatory Note




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  SILICON MOUNTAIN HOLDINGS, INC.January 2, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Rudolph (Tré) A. Cates IIIRudolph (Tré) A. Cates III,President, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorBy:
    /s/ Juan C. PerezJuan C. Perez,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit Index
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description31.1
    
    Certification31.2
    
    Certification
Exhibit
21.1











ATLANTIC
BANCGROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY








Form
10-KSB








For
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007











Subsidiary of
Registrant





Oceanside
Bank, incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida


1315
South Third Street, Jacksonville Beach, Florida  32250
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries II, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: January 16, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries II, Inc.
EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SLS International, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
John Gott, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael L. Maples, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ John Gott
-------------
John Gott
Chief Executive Officer
November 16, 2005


/s/ Michael L. Maples
---------------------
Michael L. Maples
Chief Financial Officer
November 16, 2005


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Michael Offerman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Form 10-QSB of IEH Corporation.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, is made known to me by
         others within the company, particularly during the period in which this
         quarterly report is being prepared; and

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
         this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) Presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);

         a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls.

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 14, 2007

/s/ Michael Offerman
--------------------
Michael Offerman
President (Principal Executive Officer)


                                       27
#### Gloria Delesdernier, wife of Paul MARCHAND v. Estate of Julia Loga, wife of George W. DELESDERNIER, et al. and Delesdernier Estates, Inc. In the Matter of Succession of George W. DELESDERNIER. In the Matter of Succession of Julia Theresa Loga, wife of George W. DELESDERNIER.

No. 61583.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1978.

In re: Angie Neider Delesdernier applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Plaquemines. 354 So.2d 576.

Denied.
# Brig. Gen. Landis C. Maddox

### Commander, DLA Troop Support

### 

### 

Army Brigadier General Landis C. Maddox assumed command of the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support on June 15, 2023. Under his leadership, DLA Troop Support annually provides more than $20 billion worth of food, clothing and textiles, construction and equipment, pharmaceuticals, along with medical supplies and equipment for America’s warfighters and other valued customers worldwide. To accomplish this mission, Maddox oversees a global workforce of more than 2,100 civilian and military personnel.

A Texas native, who was born in South Carolina, Maddox was commissioned in the Quartermaster Corps upon graduation from the United States Military Academy in 1996. His first assignment was with the 3rd Infantry Division at Ft. Stewart, Georgia. After completion of the Captain’s Logistics Officer Advanced Course (CLOAC), Maddox served as a staff officer in South Korea in the 19th Theater Army Area Command. He left Korea and moved back to Fort Stewart, Georgia, where he served as a staff officer and a company commander in 24th Corps Support Group (Forward), Fort Stewart, Georgia.

Prior to going to Command and General Staff College (CGSC), Maddox moved to Ft. Drum, New York and served as the Support Operations Officer and XO in the 210th Brigade Support Battalion, 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division. Following Command and General Staff College in June 2012, he then moved back to South Korea and served as the Chief of Petroleum Operations and the Chief of Current Operations in the United States Forces Korea J4, Yongsan, Korea.

Maddox commanded the Special Troops Battalion 1st Theater Sustainment Command, Fort Bragg, North Carolina and then assumed duties as a Strategic Staff Officer in the Logistics Initiative Group in the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff G4, Washington DC. After completion of the Army War College in 2018, he moved to Hawaii and served as the Assistant Chief of Staff G5 for the 8th Theater Sustainment Command, prior to assuming command of the 25th Infantry Division Sustainment Brigade, Schofield Barracks, Hawaii. After command, Maddox served as the Executive Officer for the Army Materiel Command Commanding General, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama. In his previous assignment, Maddox served as the Commander of the Joint Munitions Command, Rock Island, Illinois.

In addition, his operational experience includes five deployments to Iraq and one to Kuwait. Maddox’s military education and schools include Army War College, U.S. Army Command, and General Staff College at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, Captains Career Course, and the Quartermaster Officer Basic Course.

His civilian education included a Bachelor of Science from the United States Military Academy in Mechanical Engineering in 1996 and in 2006 he earned a Master of Arts in Human Resource Management from Webster University.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the S&K Famous Brands, Inc. (the
Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending January 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stewart M. Kasen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: April 12, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Stewart M. Kasen                 
|                     |  |     |  | Stewart M. Kasen                     
|                     |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to S&K Famous Brands, Inc. and will be retained by S&K Famous Brands, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1596

STEPHEN ALAN ALBERTS, II, Ed.D.,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

WHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY,

 Defendant – Appellee,

and

DR. LETHA ZOOK,

 Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, 

Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:09-cv-00109-FPS-JES)

Submitted: November 30, 2011 Decided: January 9, 2012

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Alan Alberts, II, Appellant Pro Se. Jacob A. Manning, 

Christopher Paull Riley, DINSMORE & SHOHL, LLP, Wheeling, West 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Alan Alberts, II, appeals the district court’s 

order granting summary judgment on his retaliation claims 

brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 

as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006), and the Age 

Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 

§§ 621 to 634 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error or evidence of judicial bias. Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alberts v. 

Wheeling Jesuit University, No. 5:09-cv-00109-FPS-JES (N.D.W. 

Va. May 25, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EX-10.14



 






	 	 	 	 	 



EXHIBIT 10.14




HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP

DIRECTOR’S RETIREMENT PLAN




AMENDMENT TO EXISTING PLAN AGREEMENT





      On August 1, 2002, Heritage Bank of the South (the “Bank”) entered into an agreement with the
undersigned Director regarding his entitlement under the Heritage Financial Group Director’s
Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) (the “Plan Agreement”).



      The Bank now desires to amend the Director’s Plan Agreement to fully accrue his Plan benefit,
notwithstanding his actual years of credited service as a director of the Bank or Heritage
Financial Group.



      The Plan contemplates that the Plan Agreement may be amended by an agreement entered into by
the parties.



      NOW THEREFORE, it is AGREED:



      That effective as of the date hereof, for purposes of determining the Director’s entitlement
under the Plan, the Director shall be credited with fifteen (15) Years of Credited Service as a
Director.



Date: October 16, 2007




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Heritage Financial Group

 	 
	 	/s/ Antone D. Lehr
 	 
	 	By: Antone D. Lehr, Chairman 	 
	 	 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Director

 	 
	 	/s/ Keith Land
 	 
	 	Keith Land
Exhibit 99.1

**Bio–Technology General Corp.**

 

70 Wood Avenue South

Iselin, New Jersey 08830

 

 

 

March 28, 2002

 

 

Securities and ExchangeCommission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.  20549-0408

 

                Re: Letter to Commission pursuant to TemporaryNote 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X,Bio–Technology General Corp. has obtained a letter of representation fromArthur Andersen LLP (“Andersen”) stating that the December 31, 2001 audit wassubject to Andersen’s quality control system for the U.S. accounting andauditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement wasconducted in compliance with professional standards, that there was appropriatecontinuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit and availability ofnational office consultation and availability of personnel at affiliates ofAndersen to conduct the relevant portions of their audit.

 

 

Very truly yours,

 

Bio–TechnologyGeneral Corp.

 

                                                                                       /s/John Bond

                                                                                       JohnBond

                                                                                       SeniorVice President-Finance

 

 

 

----
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Andrew P. Calerich, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended September 30, 2003 of American Oil & Gas, Inc.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  March 10,  2004
/s/ Andrew P. Calerich
-----------------------
Andrew P. Calerich
Chief Financial Officer
#### Jovita Perez *v.*United States

No. 7902.

Entry No. 1671.

(Judgment on remand [Abstract 53849] dated November 6, 1950)

JUDGMENT

Johnson, Judge:

This cause having come on for hearing before this court, and a judgment having been rendered (Eeap. Dec. No. 6402, dated October 3, 1946) and the United States and Jovita Perez having thereafter appealed from said judgmentoto the United States Customs Court, First Division, and the said United States Customs Court, First Division, having rendered a decision (Eeap. Dec. No. 7432, dated November 10, 1947) modifying the judgment of the trial court, and the United States having thereafter appealed from the said judgment to the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals *453(suit 4588), and the said United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals haying transmitted to the United States Customs Court, First Division, its mandate by which it appears that the judgment of the United States Customs Court, First Division, was reversed and the cause remanded for proceedings not inconsistent with the views expressed in the opinion of the said United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (C. A. D. 407, dated March 1, 1949, rehearing denied May 2, 1949), and in accordance with the said mandate, the United States Customs Court, First Division, having rendered a decision (Abstract No. 53849, dated December 20, 1949) by which it was ordered that the said cause be remanded to the trial judge for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in said cause,

Now in conformity with the said mandate of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, and the said judgment of the United States Customs Court, First Division, it is hereby

OedbRed that the proper basis for the valuation of this merchandise is cost of production, section 402 (f), and that such value is $205.55 per unit of six barrels.