alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      23**


**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**








We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
      Statements:




(1)
            Registration
                Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-56623) pertaining to the Cintas Corporation
                Partners’ Plan,


(2)
            Registration
                Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-23228) pertaining to the Incentive Stock
                Option
                Plan,


(3)
            Registration
                Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-75015) pertaining to the Unitog Company
                1997
                Stock Option Plan,


(4)
            Registration
                Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-44654) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Option
                Plan,


(5)
            Registration
                Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-78085),


(6)
            Registration
                Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-1102221) pertaining to the 2003 Director’s
                Stock Option Plan, and


(7)
            Registration
                Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-131375) pertaining to the 2005 Equity
                Compensation Plan





of
      our
      report dated July 27, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial
      statements of Cintas Corporation, our report dated July 27, 2007, with respect
      to Cintas Corporation management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal
      control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control
      over
      financial reporting of Cintas Corporation, and our report on the financial
      statement schedule of Cintas Corporation (appearing below) included in this
      Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Cintas Corporation.





Our
      audits included the financial statement schedule of Cintas Corporation listed
      in
      Item 15(a). This schedule is the responsibility of Cintas Corporation's
      management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.
      In
      our opinion, as to which the date is July 27, 2007, the financial statement
      schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial
      statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the
      information set forth therein.











/s/
      Ernst
& Young LLP








Cincinnati,
      Ohio


July
      27,
      2007
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. CITY OF POMPANO BEACH, BROWARD COUNTY, Florida, for the Use and Benefit of the POMPANO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, Appellant, v. Anthony Henry WASHINGTON, and 1970 Oldsmobile Convertible VIN: 342670E185307, Appellee.

No. 77-890.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 22, 1977.

*139Donald C. Roberge, Pompano Beach, for appellant.

Robert J. Fogan, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

The question on appeal is whether the court can award as costs, under Section 939.06, Florida Statutes (1975), damages resulting from an alleged improper towing, storage and negligent care of an automobile by the Appellant. Appellee successfully defended a Section 943.44, Florida Statutes (1975), automobile forfeiture suit after the State declined to prosecute him after he was charged with delivery of cannabis.

Apparently Appellee had to pay $400 to the towing service for towing and storage and $371.16 for repair on account of negligent care while the car was in storage. He says the City should pay him the money because its agents caused the damages. That may be so and Appellee has a right to sue. A taxing of costs is not the way to go about it. Section 939.06, Florida Statutes (1975), is not specific but its language cannot be stretched to include these costs which were incurred in a quasi-criminal forfeiture proceeding subsequent to, and collateral to, the criminal charges.

This is not a case such as bail bond premiums. *Daniel v. State,*309 So.2d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). Nor is it a case like a DWI tow-away charge. *Doran v. State,*296 So.2d 86 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). We agree with those decisions but determine this matter differently. If a government chooses to seize and attempt to have forfeited a citizen’s automobile then that government must properly seize and store the automobile or pay the towing and storage costs and repairs bills incurred as a result of improper storage. The Judgment for costs against the City of Pompano Beach is reversed without prejudice to the Appellee to seek a proper remedy.

REVERSED.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and LETTS, J., concur.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries VI, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 3, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries VI, Inc.
Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-70745  on Form S-8 of Oneida  Financial  Corp.  of our report dated June 29,
2007, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 11-K of Oneida Savings Bank 401(k)
Savings Plan and Trust for the year ended December 31, 2006.


                                                /s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
                                                --------------------------------
                                                    Crowe Chizek and Company LLC

Columbus, Ohio
June 29, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.1



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                 SECTIONS 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Central Jersey Bancorp (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, James S. Vaccaro, Chairman
and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  do hereby certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of ss.13(a) or 15(d) of
         the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  15 U.S.C.  ss.78m or
         78o(d), and,

(2)      the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




Dated: August 15, 2006                    /s/ James S. Vaccaro
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          James S. Vaccaro
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 4228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2157]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-31, RM-8930]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Des Arc, AR

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition for rule making 
filed on behalf of Whippoorwill Creek Broadcasting requesting the 
allotment of Channel 284A to Des Arc, Arkansas, as that community's 
first local commercial FM transmission service. Coordinates used for 
Channel 284A at Des Arc are 34-58-24 and 91-29-54.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before March 17, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before April 1, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 
20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties 
should serve the petitioner's counsel, as follows: Henry E. Crawford, 
Esq., Law Offices of Henry E. Crawford, 1150 Connecticut Avenue, NW., 
Suite 900, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau,
    (202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-31, adopted January 
17, 1997, and released January 24, 1997. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M 
Street, NW. Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also 
be purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, 
Washington, DC 20037, (202) 857-3800.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
See 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-2157 Filed 1-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22157]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, September 5, 1997.

Place: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 9th Fl. Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-22157 Filed 8-18-97; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1316

AN ACT

To authorize the Small Business Administration to provide

emergency relief to shellfish growers affected by toxic

red tide losses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Red Tide Emergency

5 Relief Act of 2005’’.
 †

2

S 1316 ES

1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

2 Congress finds that—

3 (1) shellfish growers, known as

4 ‘‘aquaculturists’’, from the Schoodic Peninsula in

5 Maine to Buzzards Bay in Massachusetts have suf6 fered substantial economic injury due to the worst

7 occurrence of toxic algae bloom, known as ‘‘Red

8 Tide’’, along the New England Coast since 1972;

9 (2) toxins produced by the Red Tide algae con10 taminate shellfish like clams and mussels, making

11 them unsafe for people and animals to eat, forcing

12 the extended closure of shellfish beds along contami13 nated areas.

14 (3) hundreds of shellfish growers have been af15 fected by the Red Tide, and losses industrywide are

16 estimated at $3 million a week; and

17 (4) shellfish growers are currently considered to

18 be agricultural enterprises, and are therefore ineli19 gible for economic injury disaster loans available to

20 other small business concerns through the Small

21 Business Administration;

22 (5) shellfish growers are only eligible for emer23 gency loans through the Farm Service Agency of the

24 Department of Agriculture under limited cir25 cumstances;
†

3

S 1316 ES

1 (6) the Small Business Act should be amended

2 to make shellfish growers eligible for emergency

3 small business assistance, as a complement to assist4 ance otherwise offered through Federal programs.

5 SEC. 3. AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE DISASTER ASSISTANCE TO

6 AQUACULTURE ENTERPRISES.

7 Section 18(b)(1) of the Small Business Act (15

8 U.S.C. 647(b)(1)) is amended—

9 (1) by striking ‘‘aquaculture,’’; and

10 (2) by inserting before the semicolon at the end

11 ‘‘, other than aquaculture’’.

Passed the Senate June 27, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1316

AN ACT

To authorize the Small Business Administration to

fected by toxic red tide losses.provide emergency relief to shellfish growers af-
Exhibit






AMENDMENT TO
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
2014 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN


(Effective January 1, 2016)


The Washington Real Estate Investment Trust 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended by deleting Section 2.8 and Section 2.12 of the Plan in their entirety and replacing them with the following new sections:   
    
2.8        “Ending Share Price” means (i) in the case of all Performance Periods commencing prior to January 1, 2016, the average closing price per Common Share for the twenty (20) trading days beginning on the first trading day after the end of the Performance Period on the exchange on which Common Shares are traded, and (ii) in the case of all Performance Periods commencing on or after January 1, 2016, the average closing price per Common Share for the last twenty (20) trading days of the Performance Period on the exchange on which Common Shares are traded (unless, in the case of either clause (i) or clause (ii) a Change in Control occurs during the Performance Period, in which case the term means the value per Common Share determined as of the date of the Change in Control, such value to be determined by the Committee in its reasonable discretion based on the actual or implied price per share paid in the Change in Control transaction).


2.12        “Relative Total Shareholder Return” means Total Shareholder Return ranked on a percentile basis relative to the total shareholder return of companies comprising the peer group of companies for the Performance Period using the same methodology used for calculating Total Shareholder Return.  For this purpose, the peer group of companies shall be (i) in the case of all Performance Periods commencing prior to January 1, 2016, the group of fifteen (15) companies selected by the Committee in 2014 and disclosed in the Trust’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 29, 2014, and  (ii) in the case of all Performance Periods commencing on or after January 1, 2016, the group of thirteen (13) companies listed on Exhibit A (provided, that, in the case of either clause (i) or clause (ii), if the Committee decides that any company shall cease to be a peer during the Performance  Period, it shall be deleted from the peer group, but no new companies shall be added to the peer group during the Performance Period). 



 




This amendment shall be effective as of January 1, 2016.




	
					
	 
	 
	WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	By:
	/s/ Stephen E. Riffee
	 

	 
	 
	Stephen E. Riffee
	 

	 
	 
	Executive Vice President and
	 

	 
	 
	Chief Financial Officer
	 

	 
	 
	October 21, 2015
	 




                    





 






Exhibit A


Peer Group of Companies for Performance Periods Commencing on or after January 1, 2016


American Assets Trust, Inc.
Brandywine Realty Trust
Columbia Property Trust, Inc.
Corporate Office Properties Trust
Cousins Properties Incorporated
Equity One, Inc.
First Potomac Realty Trust
Highwoods Properties, Inc.
Liberty Property Trust
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Post Properties, Inc.
Saul Centers, Inc.
Weingarten Realty Investors
#### Robert M. EVANS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-902.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 13, 1978.

Rehearing Denied July 14, 1978.

*36Kogen & Kogan and Geoffrey C. Fleck, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Paul Mendelson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY and HUBBART, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Johnson v. State,*292 So.2d 426 (Fla.2d DCA 1974); *Williams v. State,*259 So.2d 753 (Fla.1st DCA 1972); *Kelly v. State,*254 So.2d 22 (Fla.1st DCA 1971); *West v. State,*249 So.2d 505 (Fla.2d DCA 1971); *Baker v. State,*188 So.2d 346 (Fla.3d DCA 1966); *Manning v. State,*176 So.2d 380 (Fla.3d DCA 1965); § 801.121(2), Fla.Stat. (1971).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20776]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, August 7, 1997.

Place: Room 6005, 6th Floor, 1730 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

Status: Open.

Matters to be Considered: The Commission shall consider and act upon 
the following:
    1. Secretary of Labor v. Fort Scott Fertilizer, Inc., Docket Nos. 
CENT 92-334-M, CENT 93-117-M (Issues include whether the judge 
correctly determined that two violations of 30 C.F.R. Sec. 56.14101 
were caused by employee misconduct and were not the result of the 
operator's unwarrantable failure to comply with the standard, that the 
operator was not negligent, and that the operator's agent was not 
liable under section 110(c) of the Mine Act for the violation, and 
whether the judge erred by failing to consider all of the civil penalty 
criteria set forth in section 110(i) of the Mine Act.
    Any person attending the meeting who requires special accessibility 
features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, 
must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 
C.F.R. Sec. 2706.150(a)(3) and Sec. 2706.160(d).

Contact person for More Info: Jean Ellen (202) 653-5629/(202) 708-9300 
for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.
Jean H. Ellen,
Chief Docket Clerk.
[FR Doc. 97-20776 Filed 8-1-97; 4:56 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21220]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. RP97-137-008, RP97-182-006, RP97-224-008, and RP97-343-
001]


Southern Natural Gas Company, et al.; Notice of Request For 
Limited Waiver, And Proposed Delay in Service Implementation

August 6, 1997.
    Take notice on July 31, 1997, Southern Natural Gas Company, South 
Georgia Natural Gas Company, and Sea Robin Pipeline Company filed 
separate requests for limited-term waiver of GISB Standards 1.3.24 and 
1.3.25 until such time as the new SoNet computer system is in service.
    In addition, Sea Robin Pipeline Company, in Docket No. RP97-343-
001, proposes to delay implementation of its proposed pooling service 
from November 1, 1997, until the new SoNet system is placed in service.
    The companies state that they are serving copies of the instant 
filing to parties to the proceeding and its customers.
    Any person desiring to protest said filings should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be filed 
as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21220 Filed 8-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 99-7967.

#### Serrano *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Leanna Matthews BARNES et al. and Mary Ann Dunbar Wilkerson et al. v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. et al. Obie Mae JEFFERSON et al. and Dorothy Mae Bowie Wilkerson et al. v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. et al.

No. 60989.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1977.

In re: Leanna Matthews Barnes, et al. and Mary Ann Dunbar Wilkerson, et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of LaSalle. 350 So.2d 288.

Writ denied.
EXHIBIT 23                                   
                                   
                                   
                                   
                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Commission file number 333-08992),
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Commission File number
33-53988), Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Commission File number
2-87376), Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Commission File number
33-19662) and Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Commission File
number 33-04609) of our report dated July 8, 1998, which appears in
the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 1998.






                                   /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP



Minneapolis, Minnesota
August 27, 1998
Exhibit 99.2

  Written Statement of the Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer
                          of The Middleton Doll Company
                         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350


     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, I, the
undersigned Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer of The
Middleton Doll Company (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge,
that the Annual Report of Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December
31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


Date:    March 28, 2003

                                          /s/ Susan J. Hauke
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Susan J. Hauke
                                          Vice President Finance and
                                          Chief Financial Officer