alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 150 (Tuesday, August 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42129-42130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20586]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12

[[Page 42130]]

CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that 
are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of 
the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than August 20, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Pat Marshall, Manager of 
Analytical Support, Consumer Regulation Group) 101 Market Street, San 
Francisco, California 94105-1579:
    1. Richard A. Lagomarsino, Ramona Lagomarsino, Ramona Lagomarsino 
Family Limited Partnership, Robert J. Lagomarsino, all of Ventura, 
California, and Norma M. Lagomarsino, Catherine S. Wood, and Jack W. 
Wood, acting in concert, all of Carpinteria, California; to acquire 
voting shares of Americorp, Ventura, California, and thereby indirectly 
acquire American Commercial Bank, Ventura, California.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 31, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-20586 Filed 8-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cyber Digital, Inc. (the "Company")on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.C.Chatpar, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.    
/s/ J.C. Chatpar
  J.C. Chatpar  Chief Executive Officer and   Chief Financial Officer  March 17, 2005
Order filed May 7 , 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00062

- CV

____________ IRENE SILVA AND DAVI D SILVA , Appellant(s)

V.

THE CITY OF PASADENA , Appellee

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas Tr ial Court Cause No. 2013

- 36912



### O R D E R
Appellant s ’ brief was due April 1, 2015. No brief or motion for extension of
time has been filed.

Unless appellant s file a brief with this court on or before June 8 , 2015 , the court will dismiss the appeal for w ant of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1428
CHRISTIE B. TENUMAH; ARUISANTOBIONE TENUMAH; O.R.T.; E.L.T., Petitioners, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A97-189-684; A97-189-685; A97-189-686; A97-189-687) Submitted: December 14, 2005 Decided: December 30, 2005 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Liam Ge, Columbia, Maryland, for Petitioners. James Arthur Hunolt, Bryan Stuart Beier, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Christie B. Tenumah and her three children, natives and citizens of Nigeria, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying their motion to reconsider its previous order, which upheld the immigration judge’s denial of their motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2005). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Tenumah , No. A97-189-684(L) (B.I.A. Mar. 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**EXHIBIT
        99.1**
 
 **FOR
        IMMEDIATE RELEASE**




For
      additional information contact:


Michael
      W. Shelton, Chief Financial Officer


Phone:   336-369-0900











**FNB
      FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION**


**ANNOUNCES
      QUARTERLY DIVIDEND**








GREENSBORO,
      N.C.--(BUSINESS WIRE)—May 21, 2007--FNB Financial Services Corporation (NASDAQ:
      FNBF), parent of FNB Southeast, announced that the Board of Directors has
      approved a regular cash dividend of $0.13 per share for the second quarter
      of
      2007.  The dividend is payable June 29, 2007 to shareholders of record
      on June 15, 2007.




FNB
      Financial Services Corporation is a bank holding company with one operating
      subsidiary, FNB Southeast, a North Carolina chartered commercial bank. FNB
      Southeast currently operates 17 banking offices located in North Carolina and
      Virginia. FNB Southeast Mortgage Corporation and FNB Southeast Investment
      Services, Inc. are operating subsidiaries of FNB Southeast.
Eastland Woolen Mill

Photographs of Cleanup

(many of the photos were provided by Ken Dow)
Town of Corinna

War Memorial

Community Bandstand Donated 

by Emerson Family Recreational Bridge

Boardwalk for Community Walking 

Trail

Corundel Commons 

Housing Development
NO. 12-23-00235-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

AARION J. CUNNINGHAM AND IN 

THE INTEREST OF A. T., A CHILD, 

APPELLANT

V.

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY 

GENERAL,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 

COUNTY COURT AT LAW

CHEROKEE COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). 

Aarion J. Cunningham, acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal on August 24, 2023. On 

September 8, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that the notice of appeal failed to contain 

the information specifically required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and Section 

51.017(a) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code.1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5 (service); see 

also TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.017(a) (West Supp. 2019) (notice of appeal must 

be served on each court reporter responsible for preparing reporter’s record). The notice warned 

that, unless Appellant filed a proper notice of appeal on or before October 9, the appeal would be 

referred to the Court for dismissal. This deadline passed and Appellant has not filed a compliant 

notice of appeal or otherwise responded to this Court’s notice.

1 Pro se litigants are held to the same standards as licensed attorneys and must comply with all 

applicable rules of procedure; otherwise, pro se litigants would benefit from an unfair advantage over parties

represented by counsel. Muhammed v. Plains Pipeline, L.P., No. 12-16-00189-CV, 2017 WL 2665180, at *2 n.3 

(Tex. App.—Tyler June 21, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.).
2

Because Appellant failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 9.5 and Section 51.017(a), 

the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (on its own initiative after giving ten days’

notice to all parties, appellate court may dismiss appeal if appeal is subject to dismissal because 

appellant failed to comply with a requirement of these rules, a court order, or a notice from the 

clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time).

Opinion delivered October 18, 2023.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT 

OCTOBER 18, 2023 

NO. 12-23-00235-CV

AARION J. CUNNINGHAM AND IN THE INTEREST OF A. T., A CHILD, 

Appellant 

V.

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, 

Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law 

of Cherokee County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. FM2300146) 

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record, and the same 

being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that the appeal should be dismissed. 

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court 

below for observance. 

By per curiam opinion. 

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
### (:_§:0 ZQ[)IAC CABIN INTEIUOQS



### Letter ofExemption 

### no CD002/15 To: Federal Aviation Administration U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor 

## :·, ZODIACp,!ll .AEROSPACE 

# IQ
fj: 

## 02 Jacarei, August 12th, 2015.

Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. From: C&D Brasil LTDA AV. Getulio Domelles Vargas, 3000- C6rrego Seco. ZIP I2305-010

- Jacarei**~·** SP

- Brazil Accountable Manager: Fabio Vieira e-mail: Fabio.vieira@zodiacaerospace.com phone number: 11-55-12-39540721 Dear FAA, Our company currently is applying for FAA Repair Station certification for foreign repair station. Ourcurrent Repair Station Certificate Number is PRE-CERT: 5CZY462P. We are applying for exemption to 14 CRF 145.103(b) which required a certificatedrepair station with 

### an airframe rating mustprovide suitable permanent housing to enclose the largest type and model ofaircraft listed on its operations specifications. Werequire the Airframe Limited rating due to propose repair interior aircraft parts such as galley, wardrobe, stowage, lavatory, passengerservice unit, panel assembly. overheadbins, ceiling. seats, finishing covers, shrouds, linings, finish panels. etc...not located on the airport. We will workjustwith interiors components described on ATA 25 and ATA 35, do not work with aircrafts. We believe that there is no need to house to enclosethe largesttype and model ofaircraft listed on its operations specifications because we work only on interiors parts that will be ship to us by customer. The effect on safety will notbe compromised. Sincerely,



### Fabio Vieira-Accountable Manager

1
122 STAT. 4008 PUBLIC LAW 110–360—OCT. 8, 2008 

Public Law 110–360 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To reauthorize the Debbie Smith DNA Backlog Grant Program, and for other 

purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Debbie Smith Reauthorization 

Act of 2008’’. 

SEC. 2. GENERAL REAUTHORIZATION. 

Section 2 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 

2000 (42 U.S.C. 14135) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (c)(3), by— 

(A) striking subparagraphs (A) through (D); 

(B) redesignating subparagraph (E) and subparagraph 

(A); and 

(C) inserting at the end the following: 

‘‘(B) For each of the fiscal years 2010 through 2014, 

not less than 40 percent of the grant amounts shall be 

awarded for purposes under subsection (a)(2).’’; and 

(2) by amending subsection (j) to read as follows: 

‘‘(j) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There are authorized 

to be appropriated to the Attorney General for grants under subsection (a) $151,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2009 through 2014.’’. 

SEC. 3. TRAINING AND EDUCATION. 

Section 303(b) of the DNA Sexual Assault Justice Act of 2004 

(42 U.S.C. 14136(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘2005 through 2009’’ 

and inserting ‘‘2009 through 2014’’. 

42 USC 13701 

note. 

Debbie Smith 

Reauthorization 

Act of 2008. 

Oct. 8, 2008 

[H.R. 5057] 


kgrant on POHRRP4G1 with PUBLAW
PUBLIC LAW 110–360—OCT. 8, 2008 122 STAT. 4009 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5057: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110–757 (Comm. on the Judiciary). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

July 14, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 25, considered and passed Senate, amended. 

Sept. 27, House concurred in Senate amendment. 

Æ 

SEC. 4. SEXUAL ASSAULT FORENSIC EXAM GRANTS. 

Section 304(c) of the DNA Sexual Assault Justice Act of 2004 

(42 U.S.C. 14136a(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘2005 through 2009’’ 

and inserting ‘‘2009 through 2014’’. 

Approved October 8, 2008. 


kgrant on POHRRP4G1 with PUBLAW
#### Hulon B. JOHNSON, Jr., et al. v. Mrs. Bonnie BARDIN.

No. 50124.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 8, 1978.

Kellis L. Madison, R. L. Houston, Jackson, for appellants.

Bob L. McHann, Clinton, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Hinds County; J. C. Stennett, Chancellor.

Before SMITH, P. J., ROBERTSON and LEE, JJ., and FRED P. WRIGHT, Commissioner.

AFFIRMED.
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: January 24, 2015

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Howard J. Hoffman, EPA - OGC

SUBJECT: December 11, 2014 Telephone Call with Professors Freeman and Lazarus

Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

On December 11, 2014, Lorie Schmidt, Elliott Zenick, Scott Jordan, Steven Silverman and

Howard J. Hoffman of EPA-OGC met by telephone with Professors Jody Freeman and Kate 

Konaschnik of Harvard Law School to discuss legal issues concerning the proposed Clean Power 

Plan for existing power plants.
# C_2023101EN.01000201.xml

| 17.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/2 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------- |

---

Joint political statement by the European Parliament, the European Commission and the Council of the European Union on the re-use of decommitted funds in Horizon Europe (2023/C 101/02) In the Joint Declaration on the re-use of decommitted funds in relation to the research programme ( 1 ) the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission agreed to make available again to the benefit of the research programme commitment appropriations, corresponding to the amount up to EUR 0,5 billion (in 2018 prices) in the period 2021-2027 of decommitments, which results from total or partial non-implementation of projects belonging to the ‘Horizon Europe’ Framework Programme or its predecessor ‘Horizon 2020’ ( 2 ), as provided for in Article 15(3) of the Financial Regulation. In the statement ( 3 ) on Regulation (EU) 2021/695 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 April 2021 establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1290/2013 and (EU) No 1291/2013(1), the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission agreed on an indicative distribution of that amount that will be up to EUR 300 000 000 in constant 2018 prices for the cluster ‘Digital, Industry and Space’ in particular for quantum research. Without prejudice to the powers of the budgetary authority in the framework of the annual budgetary procedure and to the Commission’s powers to implement the budget, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission agree that, within the cluster on ‘Digital, Industry and Space’ of Horizon Europe, an indicative amount of EUR 200 000 000 in constant 2018 prices will be allocated to secure connectivity research activities. ( 1 )  OJ C 444 I, 22.12.2020, p. 3. ( 2 )  Regulation (EU) No 1291/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing Horizon 2020 - the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) and repealing Decision No 1982/2006/EC (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 104). ( 3 )  OJ C 185, 12.5.2021, p. 1.

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Annual contingency training underway

By Jake Joy

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, George J. Bilek, certify that:
1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Juno Lighting, Inc., a Delaware corporation;
2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
   a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 
   b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered in this report based on such evaluation;
and
   c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect , the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 
5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);
   a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; 
and
   b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: February 25, 2005



/s/ GEORGE J. BILEK
George J. Bilek
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer



Page 56