alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1445 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 330
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1445

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 520 Colorado Avenue in Arriba, Colorado, as the ``William H. Emery 
                             Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 2005

Mr. Salazar (for himself and Mr. Allard) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           December 16, 2005

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 520 Colorado Avenue in Arriba, Colorado, as the ``William H. Emery 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WILLIAM H. EMERY POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 520 Colorado Avenue in Arriba, Colorado, shall be known and 
designated as the ``William H. Emery Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William H. 
Emery Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 330

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1445

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 520 Colorado Avenue in Arriba, Colorado, as the ``William H. Emery 
                             Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 16, 2005

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### Frances CURTIS v. Alice Meyer KATZ.

No. 60794.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 1977.

In re: Alice Meyer Katz applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 349 So.2d 362.

Denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA, Pakistani officials discuss U.S. National Codification Bureau

By Tim Haidl, DLA Information Operations 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

NCBpakistancodificationNATOAC/135NATO Codification System
#### Cyrus MARINO v. George CLARK, d/b/a New Orleans Plastering Co. and New Orleans Plastering Co. and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.

No. 60774.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 1977.

In re: Cyrus Marino, applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 349 So.2d 429.

Writ denied.
### The HONORABLE EDWARD L. FILIPPINE, United States Distric t 1 

### Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. ___________ No. 96-1920

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. Terrance Eugene Bell, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: August 21, 1996 Filed: August 26, 1996

___________ Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Terrance Eugene Bell challenges the 54-month sentence imposed by the distri ct court following his guilty plea to being a felon in possessio n 1 of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We affirm.

We reject Bell's contention on appeal that the district cour t miscalculated his cri minal history category by failing to treat two prior offenses as "related" under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(a)(2). "[P]rior sentences ar e considered related if they resulted from offense s that (1) occurred on the same occasion, (2) were part of a single common scheme or plan, or (3) wer e consolidated for trial or sentencing." Section 4A1.2, comment. (n.3).Bell argues that, as a practical matter, his offenses wer e

consolidated for sentencing. It is well-settled in this circuit, however, that "two or more sen tences imposed at the same time `are not related for pur poses of U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(a)(2) if the cases proceeded to sentencin g under sep arate docket numbers, and there was no formal order o f consolidation.'" United States v. Klein , 13 F.3d 1182, 1185 (8th Cir. ) (quoting United States v. McComber , 996 F.2d 946 , 947 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam)), cert. denied , 114 S. Ct. 2722 (1994); accord United States v
. Lewchuck , 958 F.2d 246, 247 (8th Cir. 1992). To the extent Bell asks this panel to reconsider the above line of cases, one panel of this court may not overrule the opinion of another panel. See Campbell v. Purkett , 957 F.2d 535, 536 (8th Cir. 1992) (per curiam).
Bell a lso argues that the offenses were part of a common scheme o r plan. We conclude the district court did not clearly err in findin g otherwise, as the off enses at issue occurred two weeks apart and involved different victims. Cf. United States v. Lowe , 930 F.2d 645, 646-47 (8th Cir. 1991) (standard of review; noting similar crimes are not necessarily related crimes and up holding unrelatedness determination because offenses occurred at different times, involved different victims, had been committe d in different locales, and had not been consolidated). Accordingly, we affirm.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
SIGN IN SHEET -Giyphosate: meeting with Monsanto-6/4/15 Name Organization Email Khue Nguyen PRD/EPA Nguyen

. khue@epa

. gov **MLG~A<h.. 1-\ocR.A~**  **H.cN~TD ~rHo**  AA **~** H.o **\1** SAi\/TO

• c 0 **~ -:T~ES**  **JJY~** 4-v L..u fY..ON s A,...S'f 0 **\-W\~**

**.**M . n""\o. net'-\.\" (!) **""6'-'~c:t"'~**

• **~** W'\o (:HAC '-..1 Uj'C.\ \(.. l-1\0NSAN.TO

-

. **~** c'nad. e **~** wv, <' **~** 'IT'\C't'\Sa"*o

• c.c..VV') **~~l~** 5A-<.ftS **N't)l'l.m~** !::1'<.1C. 'S **SAC.~S® M~tJ'iO** 

**,** q, l'l\ Jl-vtV\

; (:e.,- L 1 \.k.{lO

('{\ 0 \ll \Ct V\. +'U

-, · , \ \ <A - t2 VVt. OVlJ Cl Vl -tv
. . ( 0 Vt.--1 **R~V\V\(A** lotA.\

' e_-- .J **~A ~kl\cJL..**  'CVA **/SY~-n**

\ '0 \A \ () -\ u -:M A ' ' n. V , r n **~a 111**  V\t. (0 .Q.n 0... .a- 0\ / -i', \AN\.0.... Sp **~-z....**

l= C!A } t:;- **,~~D 'S~~~~**  **~** ..... -0.-- (J-pCJ.-. **V'f** \1 **T~u** ,.< **~** Muv- h>---.
r- p f f /1-t f-1 ......... i/Y\ **r**nn

' fl., t.lr...l 1-r... (@ @ <.Ja. c:; 0 J **Mo!V~-'u** Pun r'\ f.PA

' / J-1/ i.b,

• **~**

, J /)if

I 0/\.

' rn 0 f\.1 (:,..-{ L d rJ... e..JJ(J\..

• u Cn/ **~~\~**
fPA I .J.JEf\

I **~\b~tv-.. :=t\AM~A**  ( , **~~-_~ ~**  **~c.) <--**  **e(L::,<1 N**  **~~I ~L** **-- AN**  **JJt""Q.~.)''I tJ** **, t.I'L.**  a, **~~ ,("~**  **..J** P....w **~/NJ /}'1~N'f~fl)**  **~·;~,Je ,npv~/Z>.**  co,....., 'V ..,.- .,_ >1.) u ' <:. ..r,.J

' r.(f1 /or·?

vv ·-1-.., V'"' o -r "' ..r --2- **r~** <',.., 1"1 pI(" c..
. **~** .xr-./ / 1 u t f1 ir7 Ne 1/'J t a' vr1 P

r .P A- /PJZ..I)

u 1-t-t \) **~** 0 **IJ** "( t;.."\7

I til A- ( **~** ePtJ:J C-.. _. **/~** .....Yr:Yo

._. V'//M'

I **~U-vt:.** A-D /'f;:n S

L P>Aif **7~~ ~k~~** **/'IVN/~C/** i& /1'1'ria,

· **.Lb~~/**

1 yr,.. f'nP/""" **~tf SA-fr#?F~.H** 

I
#### J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc. (Soeldner-Heyman Company) *v.*United States

No. 7898.

Entry No. 795231.

(Decided October 30, 1950)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley 8. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General *(Richard F. Weeks,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto, subject to approval by the Court:

> That the merchandise and issues involved in the instant appeal to reappraisement are similar in all material respects to the merchandise and issues involved in *United States*v. *J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc.*(Soeldner-Heyman Company), Reappraisement No. 7808;

> That on or about the date of exportation such merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers for home consumption in the principal market of India in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States at the following prices:

> Dubak quality — 55 Rs. 12 Annas per ton of 2240 lbs.

> Besta quality — 85 Rs. 12 Annas per ton of 2240 lbs.

> That on or about the date of exportation such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale in India for export to the United States;

> That-the record in *United States*v. *J. J. Gavin & Company, Inc.,*Reappraisement No. 7808 be received in evidence and the instant appeal to reappraisement submitted on such record and this stipulation.

*451On tbe agreed facts I find tbe foreign value, as tbat value is defined in section 402 (c) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of tbe Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of tbe merchandise bere involved, and tbat sucb values were as follows:

> Dubak quality — 55 Rs. 12 Annas per ton of 2,240 lbs.

> Besta quality — 85 Rs. 12 Annas per ton of 2,240 lbs.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Larry Curtis BIEBINGER, Petitioner.

No. C6-97-2067.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Oct. 29, 1998.

*385
      *ORDER*

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED (1) that the petition of the State of Minnesota for further review of the decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, granted and (2) that the unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals filed September 8, 1998 in this case be, and the same is, reversed and the case is remanded to the district court for an eviden-tiary hearing, not retrial. This is a prosecution for criminal sexual conduct in the first degree and other sex charges involving the same victim. The district court ordered the courtroom closed during the testimony of the victim. The jury found the defendant guilty as charged and the trial court sentenced him as a patterned sex offender. The court of appeals reversed and remanded for a new trial because the district court ordered the courtroom closed without conducting a hearing and without making adequate findings of necessity and availability of other, better alternatives to closure. As in *State v. Fageroos,*531 N.W.2d 199 (Minn.1995), the appropriate initial remedy in this situation is a remand for an evidentiary hearing, not retrial.

Reversed and remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Edward C. Stringer

Edward C. Stringer Associate Justice
Exhibit 23.1
                                                                    ------------

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-103396) and on Form S-3 (File No.
333-110297) of our report dated December 17, 2004 relating to the financial
statements and financial statement schedule of Electronic Clearing House, Inc.
which appears in Electronic Clearing House Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended September 30, 2004.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Los Angeles, California
December 29, 2004


<PAGE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# April calendar blooms with events

By Michael MolinaroDLA Land and Maritime Public Affairs

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 159 (Monday, August 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21759]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 7890-014]


Matthew Bonaccorsi; Notice Of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

August 12, 1997.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission's) 
regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order 486, 52 FR 47897), the Commission's 
Office of Hydropower Licensing has reviewed an exemption surrender 
application for the Wendell Dam Project, No. 7890-014. The Wendell Dam 
Project is located on the Sugar River in Sullivan County, New 
Hampshire. The EA finds that approving the application would not 
constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality 
of the human environment.
    Copies of the EA are available for review in the Commission's 
Reference and Information Center, Room 2A, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426. For further information, please contact the 
project manager, Ms. Hillary Berlin, at (202) 219-0038.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21759 Filed 8-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# -f'Ufu^ : ^ M i o n,-^ , ^^^j. , 20 \I

\ r•I- ; 

### O'toole , Catherin e (OST ) ri : - o r From : O'toole , Catherin e (OST ) 'v.,' . Sent : Thursday , Jun e 09 . 201 1 4:1 5 P M To : 'Michae l Origel ' Subject : Jet- Afollowu p . ; 0 I ^ '^ : ? 1 H i Michael I a m writin g t o follo wu p wit h yo u regardin g m yreques tfo rfurthe rinformation . Pleas e provid e thi s informatio n a s a n amendmen t t o th e docke t DOT-OST-2010-0120 . Thi s emai l wil l b e place d i n th e docke talso . Jus tFYI , I n reviewin g th e document s yo u place d i n th e Docke t I n Apri l 2011 , i tseem s tha tyo u poste d 2 set s o fJet-A' s Balanc e shee tan d P&L . 1 . Pleas e provid e a Resum e fo rMr . RobertHarir i (se e m yemai l fro m Jun e 8 , 2011) . 2 . Pleas e provid e JeffBarnes ' A& P licens e number . 3 . Pleas e provid e a resum e fo rMr . Geral d Sykes . 4 . Pleas e provid e a Profi t an d Loss statemen tfo rJet- Afo rY E 2010 . 5 . Pleas e provid e a lis t o fal l aircraf t tha t Jet- Aown s o rleases , an d i fleased , th e leas e agreement s associate d wit h them , {thi s wa s aske d fo rpreviously) . 6 . W e requir e documentatio n tha t Jet- Awil l provid e th e require d fundin g t o suppor tit s operations , suc h a s providin g third-part yverificatio n o fcas h deposit s currentl yi n Jet-A' s account , o rlines-of-credi t availabl e t o th e ai rcarrier . I n it s application , Jet- Aprovidin g informatio n date d Januar y2010 . Pleas e provid e mor e recen t information . I fthi s verificatio n o ffundin g shoul d includ e a line-of-credit , pleas e includ e th e tota l line-of-credi t bein g mad e available , th e amoun tsuc h credi tlin e ha s bee n draw n dow n t o date , an ycondition s tha t mus t b e me tbefor e fund s wil l b e advanced , th e term s o frepayment , an d th e expiratio n date . Further , i fth e line-of-credi ti s bein g supplie d b ya n individua l o rorganizatio n (othe rtha n a recognize d financia l institution ) copie s o fth e persona l o rcorporat e financia l statement s o fth e individua l o rorganizatio n shoul d als o b e provided . Regard s Katy KatyOTool e U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n Offic e ofAviatio n Analysi s Ai rCarrie rFitnes s Divisio n (X-56 ) phone : 202.366.999 8 fax : 202.366.763 8 Catherine.O'ToQle@dot.Qo v
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, William J.Birmingham, certify that: 

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this Form 10-K/A of Ault Incorporated (the Registrant); 

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)         Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)          Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 

 

Date:  January 9, 2006

 

 
|   | /s/ William J. Birmingham       |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|   | William J. Birmingham           |
|   | Interim Chief Financial Officer |

 

----