alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 152 (Thursday, August 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20763]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[AZ-040-4333-02]


Call for the Gila Box Advisory Committee Nominations

AGENCY: Safford Field Office, Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Extension of Call for Nominations for Gila Box Riparian 
National Conservation Area Advisory Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is to solicit public nominations to 
fill one position of the Gila Box Riparian National Conservation Area 
Advisory Committee, pursuant to Title 2, Section 201, of the Arizona 
Desert Wilderness Act of 1990.
    The purpose of the Advisory Committee is to provide informed advice 
to the Safford Field Office Manager on management of public lands in 
the Gila Box Riparian National Conservation Area. Members are currently 
assisting BLM specialists with the preparation of the Final Gila Box 
Interdisciplinary Activity Plan. The Advisory Committee will meet 
approximately one time during (FY 97) to assist plan preparation. 
Members serve without salary, but are reimbursed for travel and per 
diem expenses at current rates for government employees.
    To ensure membership of the Advisory Committee is balanced in terms 
of categories of interest represented and functions performed, nominees 
must be qualified to provide advice in specific areas related to the 
primary purposes for which the Gila Box Riparian National Conservation 
Area was created. These categories of expertise include wildlife 
conservation, riparian ecology, archaeology, hydrology, recreation, 
environmental education, or other related disciplines.
    Persons wishing to nominate individuals or those wishing to be 
considered for appointment to serve on the Advisory Committee should 
provide names, addresses, professions, biographical data, and category 
of expertise for qualified nominees. Persons selected to serve on the 
Committee will serve a three-year term ending on July 31, 2000. 
Nominations should be submitted to the Safford Field Office Manager at 
the address below.

DATES: All nominations should be received by September 2, 1997.

ADDRESSES: For further information contact: Elmer Walls, Team Leader, 
Gila Resource Area, Safford Field Office, 711 14th Ave., Safford, AZ 
85546, telephone (520) 348-4400.

    Dated: July 27, 1997.
Bill T. Civish,
Field Office Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-20763 Filed 8-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-32-M
Exhibit 32.1 - SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jagged Peak, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, Paul B. Demirdjian,
Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Paul B. Demirdjian
----------------------------
    Paul B. Demirdjian
    Chief Executive Officer
    Acting Chief Financial Officer


Date  August 15, 2005
      ---------------


<PAGE>
No. 00-6959.

#### Dunning *v.*Family Independence Agency.

Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.
1

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

PERCY LEE PALMER v. STATE OF TENNESSEE

 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County

No. F-57466 Don R. Ash, Judge

No. M2006-01673-CCA-R3-PC - Filed January 31, 2007

The Appellant, Percy Lee Palmer, appeals the trial court's dismissal of his petition for postconviction relief. Appellant concedes on appeal that the trial court's judgment is correct.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of

Criminal Appeals.

Tenn. R. App. P. 3; Judgment of the Trial Court Affirmed Pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of

the Court of Criminal Appeals

THOMAS T. WOODALL, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which JERRY L. SMITH, J., and

ROBERT W. WEDEMEYER, J., joined.

John H. Baker, III, for the appellant, Percy Lee Palmer.

Robert E. Cooper, Jr., Attorney General & Reporter; Rachel E. Willis, Assistant Attorney General,

for the appellee, State of Tennessee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Appellant timely filed a petition for post-conviction relief challenging the validity of his

guilty pleas to three counts of first degree murder. The trial court appointed counsel, who

subsequently filed an amended petition. At the hearing on the petition, the Appellant, against the

advice of counsel, declined to testify or present any proof. Finding that Appellant failed to prove the

allegations by clear and convincing evidence, see Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-110(f), the trial court

dismissed the petition.

In his brief on appeal, the Appellant acknowledges that the trial court's dismissal of his

petition is supported by the record and the law. The Appellant states that he appeals the dismissal
2

so that the issues raised in the petition may be preserved for subsequent federal habeas corpus or

other collateral review. In response to the Appellant's brief, the State filed a motion to dismiss.

According to the State, the appeal should be dismissed because the Appellant seeks no relief from

this Court.

The Court has reviewed the record on appeal. In lieu of granting the State's motion to

dismiss, and in light of the Appellant's concessions on appeal, the Court hereby affirms the judgment

of the trial court in accordance with Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

 

 ____________________________________

THOMAS T. WOODALL, JUDGE
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7514

TYRONE L. ROBERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LARRY DUBOSE, Captain; MR. SOTTILE, Chief Jailer; J. JENKINS, Jailer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Falcon B. Hawkins, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-3444-5-11-BF) Submitted: December 20, 2000 Decided: January 16, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone L. Roberson, Appellant Pro Se. Isaac McDuffie Stone, III, LAW OFFICE OF DUFFIE STONE, Bluffton, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Tyrone Lamar Roberson, a South Carolina inmate, appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants, denying his motion for appointment of counsel, denying his writ of mandamus and denying relief requested in supplemental motions to his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). This Court reviews only those issues raised in the appellant’s informal brief, therefore, only the motion for summary judgment is before this Court. 4th Cir. R.34(b). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Roberson v. DuBose , No. CA-97-3444-5-11-BF (D.S.C. Sept. 13, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>


                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
Castle BancGroup, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 
333-45325) on Form S-8 of Castle BancGroup, Inc. of our report dated February 
3, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Castle BancGroup, 
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related 
consolidated statements of earnings, changes in stockholders' equity, and 
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 
1997, which report appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 
10-K of Castle BancGroup, Inc.

/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 16, 1998


                                       68
----

|   | (a) | the                Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarterly Period Ended June 30,                2007,                filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission                (the                "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   /s/                Joseph E.                Sutaris                          |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Joseph                E. Sutaris                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | Secretary,                Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | Date:  August                3, 2007                                                                                                                                                                        |

----
1300 Mendota Heights Road, Mendota Heights, MN 5512 0 Corporate Headquarters 651.681.3900 - Reservations 800.359.6786 - Fax 651.681.3901 July 10, 2013

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building ground floor

Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Subject: Request for Extension of Exemption No. 954 8C Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2007-0040

Dear Sir/Madam,

Please accept this letter as Sun Country Airlines’ request to extend Exemption No. 9548C, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2007-0040. The current exemption pe rmits exemption from 14 CFR 47.49, 91.203(a)(b) and 121.153(a)(1) to the extent necessary to allow temporary operations of its U.S registered aircraft in domestic operations following the incidental loss o r mutilation of that aircraft’s airworthiness certi fication or registration certificate or both.

Sun Country Airlines is confident that granting an extension would not reduce the level of safety, nor have an adverse impact on the interest of the aircraft o wners or government agencies. Sun Country Airlines asserts that granting this extension is in the publ ic interest since it will allow Sun Country Airline s to continue to provide reliable and timely service to the traveling public by reducing the time that airc raft are

out of service.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate t o contact me.

Sincerely,

Duane Franklund Director Quality Assurance/Quality Control Sun Country Airlines

651-389-9580 (Office) 651-389-9600 (Fax) 651-728-1463 (Mobile)
```

[110th Congress Public Law 399]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ399.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 4223]]

Public Law 110-399
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 156 Taunton Avenue in Seekonk, Massachusetts, as the ``Lance Corporal 
     Eric Paul Valdepenas Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Oct. 13, 
                         2008 -  [H.R. 6874]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL ERIC PAUL VALDEPENAS POST OFFICE 
                              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 156 Taunton Avenue in Seekonk, Massachusetts, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Lance Corporal Eric Paul Valdepenas Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance 
Corporal Eric Paul Valdepenas Post Office Building''.

    Approved October 13, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6874:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            Sept. 23, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 30, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 Certification
        Pursuant to
 18
        U.S.C.
        Section 1350,
 (as
        adopted pursuant to Section 906
 of
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 In
        connection with the quarterly report Royal Spring Water Inc. (the “Company”), on
        Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30, 2006 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
        the undersigned of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
        1350,
        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
        to
        the best of their knowledge:
 
 1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
  A
        signed
        original of this written certification has been provided to the Company and
        will
        be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange
        Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 /s/
                  Alex HazanName:
                  Alex HazanTitle:
                  Chief Executive OfficerMarch
                  30, 2007/s/
                  Harel GoldsteinName:
                  Harel GoldsteinTitle:
                  Chief Financial OfficerMarch
                    30, 2007
  This
        Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This exhibit is not “filed” for purposes of Section
        18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as provided
        by applicable rules of the Securities Exchange Commission.
#### Rufus K. Allen, Appellant, *vs.*Frederick W. Smith and Stephen Sales, Respondents.

1. *Judgment*— Ejectment—Interest *on rents, etc.*— Where judgment is rendered in ejectment, interest on the rents is not collectable.

*Appeal from, Buchanan Circuit Court.*

*L. E. Carter & E. O. Hill,*for Appellant,

cited: 2 Wagn. Stat., 783, § 3; Stephens, Garn. vs. Gwathmey, 9 Mo. 643; Rector vs. Mark, 1 Mo. 206.

*Ben.*Loan, for Respondents.

Sherwood, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case has been before us heretofore, and is reported in 56 Mo. 28. The plaintiff recovered in ejectment, and judgment was entered accordingly for the possession of the premises, damages, etc., as well as the monthly rents, which were assessed at $108 per month. This occurred in 1872.

Owing to the appeal taken, possession was not obtained nor the judgment otherwise effectuated until 1874, when the execution as to everything but interest on the monthly rents, from time to time accruing, was satisfied. The only point at issue, therefore, between plaintiff, and defendant is, as to whether interest is, in such cases, collectable.

On motion of defendants the execution was marked satisfied, and we discover no error in such ruling. Section three of the chapter relating to interest (Wagn. Stat., 783) only seems to contemplate that interest shall be borne by a sum then ascertained, by the judgment rendered, to be due; and there is no provision made by that or any other section of the chapter referred to, giving countenance to the idea for -which plaintiff contends. Nor is there anything in the authorities to which he refers, which gives, his position any support.

The judgment is affirmed.

Judge Vories absent; the other judges concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 158 (Friday, August 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21639]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[NV-030-1220-00; Closure Notice No. NV-030-97-005]


Emergency Closure of Federal Lands

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that certain public lands west of Red 
Rock Road, Washoe County, Nevada, are closed to all motorized vehicles. 
This closure is necessary due to unauthorized road construction and 
off-road vehicle use which is causing considerable adverse effects to 
soil, vegetation and wildlife habitat in the area.

DATES: This closure goes into effect on August 15, 1997, and will 
remain in effect until the Carson City District Manager determines it 
is no longer needed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clifford Ligons, Assistant District 
Manager, Division on Non-Renewable Resources, Carson City District, 
1535 Hot Springs Road, Carson City, Nevada 89706. Telephone (702) 885-
6000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The authorities for this closure are 43 CFR 
8341.2, 43 CFR 8342.3 and 43 CFR 8364.1. Any person who fails to comply 
with a closure order is subject to arrest and fines in accordance with 
applicable provisions of 18 U.S.C 3571 and/or imprisonment not to 
exceed 12 months.
    This closure applies to all motorized vehicles excluding (1) any 
emergency or law enforcement vehicle while being used for emergency 
purposes, and (2) any vehicle whose use is expressly authorized in 
writing by the Carson City District Manager.
    The public lands affected by this closure are located north of 
Reno, Nevada, approximately one mile southwest of Red Rock Road, and 
include lands within:

Mt. Diablo Meridian

T.22N., R.18E.
    Sec. 11, NE\1/4\ NW\1/4\.

    A map of the area closed to motorized vehicles is posted in the 
Carson City District Office.

    Dated: August 1, 1997.
John O. Singlaub,
Carson City District Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-21639 Filed 8-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-M
EXHIBIT 21.1

                            SUBSIDIARIES OF BIGSTRING

Name of Subsidiary                                State of Incorporation
------------------                                ----------------------

Email Emissary, Inc.                              Oklahoma

BigString Interactive, Inc.                       New Jersey
##### 



Exhibit 21. Subsidiaries of the
Company

|                                         |  |                 |          |                              |  |                                         
|---------------------------------------- |  | --------------- | -------- | ---------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|                                         |  | Jurisdiction of |          | Names Under Which Subsidiary
|Name of Subsidiary                       |  | Incorporation   |          | Transacts Business          
|                                         |  |                 |          |                             
|Hudson Valley Bank                       |  |                 | New York |                              |  | Hudson Valley Bank                      
|HVB Leasing Corp.                        |  |                 | New York |                              |  | HVB Leasing Corp.                       
|Hudson Valley Investment Corp.           |  |                 | Delaware |                              |  | Hudson Valley Investment Corp.          
|Sprain Brook Realty Corp.                |  |                 | New York |                              |  | Sprain Brook Realty Corp.               
|Grassy Sprain Real Estate Holdings, Inc. |  |                 | New York |                              |  | Grassy Sprain Real Estate Holdings, Inc.
|HVB Employment Corp.                     |  |                 | New York |                              |  | HVB Employment Corp.                    
|HVB Realty Corp.                         |  |                 | New York |                              |  | HVB Realty Corp.