alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 99-7742.

#### Simpson v. United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2013

t1216

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2013

147632

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147632

COA: 310306

Wayne CC: 11-008130-FC

SHAUN WILLIAM BREWER,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 30, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 31, 2014

NO. 03-13-00346-CV

Christopher Lee Phillips, Appellant

v.

SACHEM, Inc., Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on April 17, 2013. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in 

the court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s judgment and remands the 

case to the trial court for further proceedings. The appellee shall pay all costs relating to this 

appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-90338) onForm S-3 and the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-114810, 333-53224, 33-56844, 33-43595 and 33-16260) on Form S-8 of Immunomedics, Inc. of our reports dated September 7, 2005 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules ofImmunomedics, Inc., Immunomedics management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Immunomedics, included in this Annual Report (Form10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2005. 

 

**/s/ Ernst & Young LLP**

 

MetroPark, New Jersey 

September 9, 2005
The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:

 


  	TEN COM
	—
	 as tenants in common
	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT – ____ Custodian ____

	 
	 
	 
	 (Cost)         (Minor)

	TEN ENT
	—
	as tenants by the entireties
	under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act ________

	JT TEN
	—
	as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common
	(State)





Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list

For value received ____ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto

 


  	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
	 

	

           
	 





 


  	 
	 





(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE)


	
                         
 	 	
                         
 
	
                         
 	 	
                         
 




                                                                                                                                                                                                         Shares represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint

                                                                                                                                                    Attorney to transfer the said Shares on the, books of the, within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.

Dated _____________


  	 
	In presence of





 


  	 
	 
	 
	 





NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 153 (Friday, August 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20999]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Proposed Additions to the Procurement List; Correction

    In the document appearing on page 34686, FR Doc. 97-16920, in the 
issue of June 27, 1997, in the second column, the NSNs listed for 
Slacks, Woman's, USMC should read as follows:

8410-01-413-5188
8410-01-413-5189
8410-01-413-5190
8410-01-413-5193
8410-01-413-5194
8410-01-413-5195
8410-01-413-5196
8410-01-413-5245
8410-01-413-5248
8410-01-413-5256
8410-01-413-5258
8410-01-413-5259
8410-01-413-5260
8410-01-413-5262
8410-01-413-5800
8410-01-413-5855
8410-01-413-5860
8410-01-413-5864
8410-01-413-5872
8410-01-413-5875
8410-01-413-5877
8410-01-413-5880
8410-01-413-5881
8410-01-413-5883
8410-01-413-5884
8410-01-413-5886
8410-01-413-5887
8410-01-413-5888
8410-01-413-5889
G. John Heyer,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-20999 Filed 8-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2599
BILLY EARL SMITH, JR., a/k/a Johnathan David Smith, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM BYRD PRESS, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-98-169) Submitted: February 2, 1999 Decided: February 17, 1999Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Billy Earl Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Daryl Eugene Webb, Jr., Kimberly W. Daniel, MAYS & VALENTINE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Billy Earl Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action in which he alleged discriminatory treatment,defamation, and invasion of privacy. Our review of the record discloses that Smith failed to allege a federal cause of action and that the district court did not have jurisdiction to consider Smith’s potential state law claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (1994); 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332 (West 1993 & Supp. 1998). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We denySmith’s “Motion for Additional Information,” his “Motion of Explanation of Plaintiff’s Oral Argument of Transcript as Attachment of Appeal and Informal Brief, etc.,” and his “Motion to Clerk’s Office Involving Case.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# CFC kickoff encourages HQC employees to give back, help make a difference 

By Amanda NeumannDLA Public Affairs

                Fort Belvoir, Virginia  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA Headquartersannual charity campaignCFC
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2367 

AN ACT 

To strike the word ‘‘lunatic’’ from Federal law, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2367 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘21st Century Lan3 guage Act of 2012’’. 

4 SEC. 2. MODERNIZATION OF LANGUAGE REFERRING TO 

5 PERSONS WHO ARE MENTALLY ILL. 

6 (a) WORDS DENOTING NUMBER, GENDER, AND SO

7 FORTH.—Section 1 of title 1, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘and ‘lunatic’ ’’; and 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘lunatic,’’. 

11 (b) BANKING LAW PROVISIONS.— 

12 (1) TRUST POWERS.—The first section of the 

13 Act entitled ‘‘An Act to place authority over the 

14 trust powers of national banks in the Comptroller of 

15 the Currency’’, approved September 28, 1962 (12 

16 U.S.C. 92a), is amended— 

17 (A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘com18 mittee of estates of lunatics,’’; and 

19 (B) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘com20 mittee of estates of lunatics’’. 

21 (2) CONSOLIDATION AND MERGERS OF

22 BANKS.—The National Bank Consolidation and 

23 Merger Act (12 U.S.C. 215 et seq.) is amended— 

24 (A) in section 2 (12 U.S.C. 215)— 
3 

†S 2367 ES

1 (i) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘re2 ceiver, and committee of estates of luna3 tics’’ and inserting ‘‘and receiver’’; and 

4 (ii) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘re5 ceiver, or committee of estates of lunatics’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘or receiver’’; and 

7 (B) in section 3 (12 U.S.C. 215a)— 

8 (i) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘re9 ceiver, and committee of estates of luna10 tics’’ and inserting ‘‘and receiver’’; and 

11 (ii) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘re12 ceiver, or committee of estates of lunatics’’ 

13 and inserting ‘‘or receiver’’. 

Passed the Senate May 23, 2012. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2367 

AN ACT 

To strike the word ‘‘lunatic’’ from Federal law, and 

for other purposes.
#### William Henry BROWN, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana Through the DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION.

No. 61830.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 7, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana through the Louisiana Department of Corrections applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Writ denied.

SANDERS, C. J., SUMMERS and MARCUS, JJ., would grant.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(A)



                      [PETERS ELWORTHY & MOORE LETTERHEAD]


Noise Cancellation Technologies (Europe) Limited

Auditors' Report to the Shareholders
on the Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 1999

We have audited the financial statements on pages 4 to 14, which have been
prepared in accordance with the Financial Reporting Standard for Smaller
Entities (effective March 1999) under the historical cost convention and the
accounting policies set out on page 7.


RESPECTIVE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DIRECTORS AND AUDITORS

As described on page 1 the company's directors are responsible for the
preparation of the financial statements. It is our responsibility to form an
independent opinion, based on our audit, on those statements and to report our
opinion to you.


BASIS OF OPINION

We conducted our audit in accordance with Auditing Standards issued by the
Auditing Practices Board. An audit includes examination, on a test basis, of
evidence relevant to the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. It
also includes an assessment of the significant estimates and judgements made by
the directors in the preparation of the financial statements, and of whether the
accounting policies are appropriate to the company's circumstances, consistently
applied and adequately disclosed.

We planned and performed our audit so as to obtain all information and
explanations which we consider necessary in order to provide us with sufficient
evidence to give reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free
from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud, other irregularity or
error. In forming our opinion we also evaluated the overall adequacy of the
presentation of the information in the financial statements.


FUNDAMENTAL UNCERTAINTY

In forming our opinion, we have considered the adequacy of the disclosures made
in note 1 of the financial statements concerning the company's operational
results and financial position. In view of the significance of the company
continuing to generate adequate working capital, and its reliance on continued
financial support from the parent company we consider that it should be drawn to
your attention but our opinion is not qualified in this respect.


OPINION

In our opinion the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state
of the company's affairs as at 31 December 1999 and of its profit for the year
then ended and have been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act
1985.


/s/ PETERS ELWORTHY & MOORE
---------------------------
Chartered Accountants and
Registered Auditor


CAMBRIDGE
17 February 2000

                                      113
No. 00-6559.

#### Storbeck *v.*Saks Fifth Avenue et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.53

|Irwin J. Gruverman
16 Tanglewood Road
Needham, MA 02194 |  | December 31, 2002
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------

Dear
Mr. Gruverman:

This
will confirm our Agreement concerning your compensation as Chairman and CEO of MFIC.

Subject
to approval by the Board, we will pay you at a base rate of $95,000 per year, beginning January 1, 2003. You will participate in a bonus pool, if any, for management
employees, and the Board will consider a Special Bonus if financial results and stock performance warrant it. You agree that MFIC will withhold money from your compensation to pay appropriate taxes.
You will be included in MFIC's insurance and medical programs as in past years, at no cost to you, as part of your compensation.

|MFIC CORPORATION               |  |                            
|------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------
|/s/ Irwin Gruverman            |  |                            
|Irwin Gruverman, CEO, Chairman |  | Irwin Gruverman, for myself
|/s/ Robert Bruno               |  |                            
|Robert Bruno, President        |  |                            

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of  Minden  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10- KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Becky T. Harrell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                               /s/ Becky T. Harrell
                                               --------------------
                                               Becky T. Harrell
                                               Chief Financial Officer,
                                               April 2, 2007


      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act has  been  provided  to  Minden  Bancorp,  Inc.  and will be
retained by Minden  Bancorp,  Inc. and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       -1-
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 7639** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. FARUQ C. A. SHAFIQ , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. James R. Spencer , Chief District Judge. ( 3:03

- cr - 00338

- JRS

- 1 )

Submitted : June 17, 2010 Decided: June 23, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Faruq C. A. Shafiq, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Elizabeth Chase, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Faruq C. A. Shafiq appeal s the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Shafiq , No. 3:03

- cr - 003 38

- JRS

- 1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 10, 2009) . We deny Shafiq’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisio nal
process.
AFFIRMED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Cost summit helps build customer trust, understanding

By Dianne Ryder

Scott and Poleo indicated that TRANSCOM and Coast Guard representatives, who both  attended the summit for the first time, have a standing invitation to future summits. 

Poleo also noted the summits were productive and increased DLA’s credibility with its customers. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Cost SummitfinancefiscalBetter Buying Power
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 158 (Friday, August 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21675]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Combined Arts Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Combined Arts Advisory Panel, Music Section A (Creation & 
Presentation category) to the National Council on the Arts will be held 
on September 8-12, 1997. The panel will meet from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 
p.m. on September 8; from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on September 9 and 10; 
from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on September 11; and from 9:00 a.m. to 
12:00 p.m. on September 12 in Room 730 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20506. A portion of this 
meeting, from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. on September 11, will be open to 
the public for a policy discussion on guidelines, Leadership 
Initiatives, Millennium projects, planning, and field needs and trends.
    The remaining portions of this meeting, from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 
p.m. on September 8; from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on September 9 and 10; 
from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. on September 11 and from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 
p.m. on September 12 are for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, 
evaluation, and recommendation on applications for financial assistance 
under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 
1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to the 
agency by grant applicants. In accordance with the determination of the 
Chairman of March 31, 1997, these sessions will be closed to the public 
pursuant to subsection (c)(4)(6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, 
United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and may be permitted to 
participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion of the panel 
chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal employee in 
attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506, 202/682-5532, 
TDY-TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D.C., 20506, or call 202/682-5691.

    Dated: August 12, 1997.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 97-21675 Filed 8-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M