alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20599]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Public Workshop on FDA Regulatory Requirements for the 
Bioresearch Industry

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (Office of Regulatory 
Affairs, Florida District Office, and Center for Drug Evaluation and 
Research) is announcing the following meeting: A public workshop on FDA 
regulatory requirements for the bioresearch industry. The workshop is 
designed to assist the industry in complying with regulations for 
institutional review boards and clinical investigators. FDA's survey of 
the bioresearch industry shows that many firms are either unaware of 
applicable regulations and guidelines or not in compliance with 
applicable requirements.

    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on Monday, September 15, 
1997, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

    Location: The meeting will be held at University of Florida Campus, 
Reitz Union--The Rion Ballroom, Museum Rd., Gainesville, FL 32611.

    Contact: Julie D. Bringger, Jacksonville Resident Post, Food and 
Drug Administration, 400 West Bay St., Drawer #35069, Jacksonville, FL 
32202, 904-232-3596, FAX 904-232-2880.
    Registration and Requests for Oral Presentations: Send registration 
information (including name, title, firm name, address, telephone, and 
facsimile number) to the contact person by September 1, 1997. There is 
no registration fee for this workshop. Space is limited, therefore 
interested parties are encouraged to register early.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact Julie D. Bringger at least 7 days in advance.

    Dated: July 30, 1997.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 97-20599 Filed 8-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
Exhibit 10.15(b)


   Schedule of Secured Convertible Notes (refinancings after October 31, 2005)
  issued by NCT Group, Inc. to Carole Salkind and outstanding February 28, 2006



                                                                  Conversion
       Issue Date           Due Date             Principal         Price (a)
       ----------           --------         --------------        ---------
        12/07/05            06/07/06         $     959,384          $0.0100
        12/22/05            06/22/06             2,077,979          $0.0100
        01/12/06            07/12/06            31,637,249          $0.0100
        02/07/06            08/07/06            15,653,600          $0.0100
        02/13/06            08/13/06            27,034,868          $0.0100

                                            -----------------
                                             $  77,363,080
                                            =================

(a)  Note  conversion  price will be the  greater  of: (i) the lowest  last sale
     price of NCT's common stock during the two-day period comprised of the date
     of the note and the  preceding  date; or (ii) the par value of NCT's common
     stock on the date the conversion notice is delivered to NCT.
(:_§:0 ZQ[)IAC 

CABIN INTEIUOQS 

Letter of Exemption no CD002/15 

To: Federal Aviation Administration 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor 

:·, ZODIACp,!ll 

.AEROSPACE IQ 

fj: 02 

Jacarei, August 12th, 2015. 

Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. 

From: C&D Brasil L TDA 

AV. Getulio Domelles Vargas, 3000- C6rrego Seco. 

ZIP I 2305-010 -Jacarei ~· SP - Brazil 

Accountable Manager: Fabio Vieira 

e-mail: Fabio.vieira@zodiacaerospace.com 

phone number: 11-55-12-39540721 

Dear FAA, 

Our company currently is applying for FAA Repair Station certification for foreign repair station. 

Our current Repair Station Certificate Number is PRE-CERT: 5CZY462P. 

We are applying for exemption to 14 CRF 145.103(b) which required a certificated repair station with an 

airframe rating must provide suitable permanent housing to enclose the largest type and model of aircraft listed on 

its operations specifications. 

We require the Airframe Limited rating due to propose repair interior aircraft parts such as galley, wardrobe, 

stowage, lavatory, passenger service unit, panel assembly. overhead bins, ceiling. seats, finishing covers, shrouds, 

linings, finish panels. etc ... not located on the airport. 

We will work just with interiors components described on ATA 25 and ATA 35, do not work with aircrafts. 

We believe that there is no need to house to enclose the largest type and model of aircraft listed on its 

operations specifications because we work only on interiors parts that will be ship to us by customer. 

The effect on safety will not be compromised. 

Sincerely, 

Fabio Vieira- Accountable Manager 

1
Exhibit 32.1

# Written Statement of
the President and Chief Executive Officerof The Middleton Doll CompanyPursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350

Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, the undersigned President and
Chief Executive Officer of The Middleton Doll Company (the Company), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report of Form 10-K of the Company for the
period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 31, 2006

| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| | /s/ Salvatore L. Bando               
| | Salvatore L. Bando                   
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.21
 FORM OF WARRANT
    Warrant to Purchase Shares of 
Common Stock 
Warrant No. ___
    
    April ___, 2008
Number of Shares: 89,284
(Subject to adjustment)
   Exercise Period




---



##### 



Procedure for Exercising Warrant
  Exhibit A
  Exhibit B
     Net Exercise
 2




---



##### 



X = Y (A-B)AWhere X =
    
    the number of shares of Common Stock to be issued to the HolderY =
    
    the number of shares of Common Stock purchasable under the
Warrant or, if only a portion of the Warrant is being exercised, the portion of
the Warrant being canceled (at the date of such calculation)A =
    
    the fair market value of one share of the Companys Common
Stock (at the date of such calculation)B =
    
    Exercise Price (as adjusted to the date of such calculation)
    Exercise Agreement Exhibit A
 3




---



##### 



Fractional Shares
 Securities Acts Compliance
 Adjustment in Shares of Common Stock and Exercise Price provided however
 Subdivision or Combination of Shares
 4




---



##### 



Effect of Sale, Merger or Consolidation
 [Intentionally Omitted.]
 [Intentionally Omitted.]
 [Intentionally Omitted.]
 Warrants Not Callable.
 Notice to Holder of Adjustment
 Prior Notice as to Certain Events
 5




---



##### 



Reservation of Common Stock
 No Voting Rights; Limitations of Liability
 Restrictions on Transfer of Warrant
 Exhibit B
 6




---



##### 



Miscellaneous
 Waiver
 Notices
 Governing Law; Venue
 Successors
 Headings and Exhibits
 7




---



##### 



8




---



##### 



SILICON MOUNTAIN HOLDINGS, INC.By:Rudolph (Tré) Cates, IIIPresident and Chief Executive Officer




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 Exercise Agreement
 To: Silicon Mountain Holdings, Inc.
    
    Dated:
   Name:Address:
  Name:Address:
 Dated:HOLDER:Signature:




---



##### 



EXHIBIT B
 Assignment
  FOR VALUE RECEIVED(Assignor)hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto(Assignee)(Name)(Address)
  Date:
    
    
    
    Assignor:ByItsSignature:APPROVED:
    
    SILICON MOUNTAIN HOLDINGS, INC.Date:ByItsSignature
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(D)



                      [PETERS ELWORTHY & MOORE LETTERHEAD]
                          Salisbury House, Station Road
                            Cambridge CB1 2LA England


Our Ref: PRC/J/5799
Date:    11 April 2000


NCT Group, Inc.
(formerly Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc.)
1025 West Nursery Road, Suite 120
Linthicum, MD 21090-2103
USA


Dear Sirs:

We are writing to you with confirmation that the accounts for the year ended
31 December 1999 were audited under auditing standards which are "substantially
similar" or "similar in all material respects" to US General Accepted Audit
Standards.



Yours faithfully


/s/ PETERS ELWORTHY & MOORE

                                      114
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 160 (Tuesday, August 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21925]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. ER97-3837-000]


Minnesota Power & Light Company; Notice of Filing

August 13, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 21, 1997, Minnesota Power & Light Company 
(MP) tendered for filing a report of short-term transactions that 
occurred during the quarter ending June 30, 1997, under MP's WCS-2 
Tariff which was accepted for filing by the Commission in Docket No. 
ER96-1823-000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 or 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before August 26, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to make the 
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21925 Filed 8-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit
      32.01**





**FNB
      FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION**








**Certification
      of Periodic Financial Report**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**








Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of FNB Financial Services
      Corporation (the “Company”) certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
      the Company for the period ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.








Dated:  May
                10, 2007
            */s/
                PRESSLEY A.RIDGILL*Pressley
                A. RidgillChief
                Executive OfficerDated:  May
                10, 2007
            */s/
                MICHAEL W. SHELTON*Michael
                W. SheltonChief
                Financial Officer











*This
      certificate is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to
      the
      knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
      purpose.






24
Order entered December 20, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00801-CR

THOMAS WILSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16-71680-T

ORDER

The clerk’s record reflects appellant is indigent and is represented by counsel. The 

reporter’s record was due on October 26, 2018. When it was not filed, we notified court reporter 

Trashuna Salaam by postcard dated October 30, 2018 and instructed her to file, by November 29, 

2018, the reporter’s record or written verification that no hearings were recorded or that 

appellant had not requested the reporter’s record. To date, we have not received the reporter’s 

record nor have we had any communication from Ms. Salaam.

We ORDER the complete reporter’s record filed BY JANUARY 2, 2019. We caution 

Ms. Salaam that the failure to do so will result in the Court taking whatever remedies it has 

available to ensure that the appeal proceeds in a timely fashion, which may include ordering that 

she not sit until the complete reporter’s record is filed.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Livia Liu Francis, 

Presiding Judge, 283rd Judicial District Court; Trashuna Salaam, court reporter, 283rd Judicial 

District Court; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Order entered July 9, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00167-CV

SARAH GREGORY AND NEW PRIME, INC., Appellants

V.

JASWINDER CHOHAN, ET AL AND ALMA J. PERALES, ET AL, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-02925-E

ORDER

Although ordered to file the overdue clerk's record no later than June 25, 2018, Dallas 

County Clerk John F. Warren has failed to do so. Accordingly, we again ORDER Mr. Warren 

to file the clerk's record. The record shall be filed no later than July 13, 2018. Extension 

requests will be disfavored.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT
99.1   Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  In connection with the Annual Report of Nortech Systems Incorporated
(the Company) on Form 10- K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Michael J. Degen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1)The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Michael J. DegenMichael J. DegenChief Executive Officer March 29, 2003Nortech Systems Incorporated
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6098

HAROLD LONNIE ROBERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN WITKOWSKI, Perry Correctional Institution; ASSOCIATE WARDEN BROCK, Perry Correctional Institution; W. D. CATOE, Deputy

Director, Headquarters,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-1561-3-10BC)

Submitted: March 26, 1998 Decided: April 6, 1998

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold Lonnie Roberson, Appellant Pro Se. Holly Saleeby Atkins,

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Roberson v. Witkowski, No.

CA-95-1561-3-10BC (D.S.C. Sept. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 217TH DISTRICT COURT OF ANGELINA COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 17th

day of December, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

NITA RANAE MCELRATH, Appellant

NO. 12-14-00247-CR; Trial Court No. 2013-0522

By per curiam opinion.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss the appeal 

herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by 

this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and that the 

decision be certified to the court below for observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 10th day of February, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
Docket No: FAA-2015-3143 Dir ID: 2015-NM-047-AD
Development of Chemical Precipitation Operation and Maintenance Costs:

Energy

Total operation and maintenance costs include the following cost elements:

(1) Operating Labor Cost

(2) Maintenance Labor Cost

(3) Maintenance Materials Cost

(4) Chemical Purchase Cost

(5) Energy Cost

This Excel workbook supports EPA's derivation of cost element (5) using vendor data.

The following worksheet develops a relationship between filter press power requirements and sludge flow rate. The 

relationship is used to calculate the energy requirements and then energy costs in the Steam Electric Cost Model. See 

DCN SE01825.A35 as the source of data used on this analysis.
e Costs:

e flow rate. The 

c Cost Model. See 
Sludge Flow, gpm Energy requirements, HP

280 17.5

140 10.5

14 5

y = 0.047x + 4.1937

R2 = 0.9985

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Energy requirements, HP

Sludge Flow, gpm

Filter Press Power Requirements vs. 

Sludge Flow
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No s . 06 - 19 - 00150 - CR , 06 - 19 - 00140 - C R,

06 - 19 - 00152 - CR & 06 - 19 - 00113 - CR LOWELL THOMAS REDDEN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ****** EDGAR LEE STARR, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ****** JOHN ELIE LEBLANC, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ****** BARON VAUGHAN UTZMAN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 188th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No s . 40208 - A , 48,108 - A, 45834 - A, & 48388 - A Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.2 

### O RDER This Court has before it four separate appeals, conducted by the same trial judge and before the same official court reporter, Grelyn Freeman. The record in Lowell Thomas Redden v. The State of Texas , cause number 06 - 19 - 00150 - CR, was due on September 30, 2019, after this C ourt granted one request for extension of time in which to file the record. Freeman has filed a second extension request, seeking an additional twenty days in which to file the record. The record in Edgar Lee Starr v. The State of Texas , cau se number 06 - 19 - 00140 - CR, was due on October 1, 2019. Freeman has not filed a request for extension of time to file the record in that case. The record in John Elie LeBlanc v. The State of Texas , cause number 06 - 19 - 00152 - CR, is due, after two extensions, on October 23, 2019. The record in Baron Vaughan Utzman v. The State of Texas , cause number 06 - 19 - 00113 - CR, was due on October 4, 2019. Today, Freeman filed a motion to extend the filing deadline for thirty days. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedur e instruct: The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. The appellate court may extend the deadline to file the record if requested by the clerk or reporter. Each extension must not excee d 30 days in an ordinary or restricted appeal, or 10 days in an accelerated appeal. The appellate court must allow the record to be filed late when the delay is not the appellant ’ s fault, and may do so when the delay is the appellant ’ s fault. The appella te court may enter any order necessary to ensure the timely filing of the appellate record. T EX . R. A PP . P. 35.3(c). In light of the condensed time frame in which each of the referenced records is due, we believe it beneficial to issue a scheduling order for the submission of each of these records. We3 therefore order Freeman, official court reporter for the 188th Judicial District Court of Gregg County, Texas, to prepare and file these records as set out below:

C AUSE N UMBER S TYLE F ILING D EADLINE 06 - 19 - 00152 - CR John Elie LeBlanc v. The State of Texas October 23, 2019 06 - 19 - 00150 - CR Lowell Thomas Redden v. The State of Texas October 29, 2019 06 - 19 - 00113 - CR Baron Vaughan Utzman v. The State of Texas November 8, 2019 06 - 19 - 00140 - CR Edgar Lee Starr v. The State of Texas November 15, 2019 The deadlines set forth in this order are final . IT IS SO ORDERED. BY THE COURT Date: October 9, 2019
Exhibit
32.2









CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Microfluidics International Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian E. LeClair, the Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)                The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)                The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Brian
      E. LeClairBrian
      E. LeClairExecutive
      Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:
      March 30, 2009