alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21994]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 1962-000]

Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Notice of Commission Staff 
Attendance at a Public Workshop on the Sediment Management Plan for the 
Rock Creek and Cresta Reservoirs

August 14, 1997.
    Take notice that staff from the Office of Hydropower Licensing, 
Division of Licensing and Compliance, will be attending a public 
workshop in Sacramento, CA from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. on Thursday, 
September 4, 1997. Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) is conducting 
the workshop on the Sediment Management Plan for the Rock Creek and 
Cresta reservoirs in connection with PG&E's Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (FERC) license application for the Rock Creek-Cresta 
Project. The public workshop will be held at 2740 Gateway Oaks Drive, 
Sacramento, CA. For further information, please contact Mr. Tom Jereb 
of PG&E at (415) 973-9320.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21994 Filed 8-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
exv10w3



 





Exhibit 10.3




ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION

1999 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN




AMENDMENT TO PERFORMANCE UNIT AGREEMENT




     THIS AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”), effective as of November 6, 2007 (the “Effective Date”),
amends the Performance Unit Agreement, dated December 6, 2005 (the “Agreement”), by and between
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation (the “Company”) and                                          (“Employee”).



     WHEREAS, the Company and Employee desire to amend and terminate the Agreement by canceling the
entire Agreement and forfeiting all performance units awarded thereunder; and



     WHEREAS, the Company and Employee recognize and acknowledge that the performance units granted
under the Agreement have not vested and have no value whatsoever as of the Effective Date;



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Employee hereby agree as follows:




	 	1.	 	The Agreement is hereby terminated and shall be void, in its entirety, as of the
Effective Date;
	 
	 	2.	 	All performance units under the Agreement are cancelled and forfeited;
	 
	 	3.	 	None of the performance units awarded under the Agreement have vested;
	 
	 	4.	 	None of the performance units awarded under the Agreement have any value; and
	 
	 	5.	 	No payment shall be made to Employee due to such termination of the Agreement or
forfeiture of the performance units.





     The Company has caused this Amendment to be duly executed by an officer thereunder duly
authorized, and Employee has executed this Amendment, effective as of the Effective Date.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Name:	 	Preston Johnson, Jr.	 	 	 	Date
	 	 	Title:	 	Vice President, Human Resources	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	EMPLOYEE	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Name	 	 	 	Date
NOTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

PHILIP FINKLE,
Claimant

- Appellant

v.

DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent

- Appellee

______________________

2023

- 1474

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for
Veterans Claims in No. 19

- 5787, Judge Michael P. Allen.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

K ENNETH M. C ARPENTER

, Law Offices of Carpenter Chartered, Topeka, KS, argued for claimant

- appellant.

M ATTHEW J UDE C ARHART

, Commercial LitigationBranch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent

- appellee. Also represented by B RIAN M. B OYNTON

, M ARTIN F.

H OCKEY

, J R

., P ATRICIA M. M C C ARTHY ; J ONATHAN K RISCH

, Y. K EN L EE , Office of General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC. Case: 23-1474 Document: 31 Page: 1 Filed: 07/11/2024______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST

, C LEVENGER

, and C HEN

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

July 11 , 2024
Date Case: 23-1474 Document: 31 Page: 2 Filed: 07/11/2024
# C_2012295EN.01003402.xml

| 29.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/34

---

Action brought on 27 July 2012 — ZZ v Council

(Case F-81/12)

2012/C 295/60

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decisions not to promote the applicant to grade AD12 in respect of promotion years 2010 and 2011.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority not to promote the applicant to grade AD12 in respect of promotion year 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority not to promote the applicant to grade AD12 in respect of promotion year 2010;

| — | Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority not to promote the applicant to grade AD12 in respect of promotion year 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority not to promote the applicant to grade AD12 in respect of promotion year 2011;

| — | If necessary, annul the decision of 18 April 2012 rejecting the claims brought against the decisions not to promote him to grade AD12 in respect of promotion years 2010 and 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

If necessary, annul the decision of 18 April 2012 rejecting the claims brought against the decisions not to promote him to grade AD12 in respect of promotion years 2010 and 2011;

| — | Order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council to pay the costs.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21310]



[[Page 43324]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP88-262-036]


Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company; Notice of Refund Report

August 7, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 5, 1997, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line 
Company (Panhandle) tendered for filing its Refund Report in accordance 
with Article II, Section 2 of the Stipulation and Agreement 
(Settlement) dated April 25, 1997.
    Panhandle states that this Settlement resolves its refund and 
repayment obligations to Associated Natural Gas Company (Associated) 
for the Docket No. RP88-262-000 rate period.
    On July 10, 1997 Panhandle states that it distributed a check for 
$30,000 to Associated, representing the Settlement Amount in accordance 
with Article II, Section 1 of the Settlement.
    Panhandle states that copies of this filing are being served on all 
affected customers, applicable state regulatory agencies and all 
parties to these proceedings.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file protest with 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before August 14, 1997. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21310 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42972]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21065]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP96-200-024]


NorAm Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

August 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 1, 1997, NorAm Gas Transmission Company 
(NGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet to be 
effective August 1, 1997:

First Revised Sheet No. 7E.01

    NGT states that this tariff sheet is filed herewith to reflect a 
specific negotiated rate transaction for the month of August, 1997.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such protests 
must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestant parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21065 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of and for the period covered by theReport. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                | /s/      Kevin      M. McCarthy           |
|---------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                | Kevin      M. McCarthy                         |
|                | President      and Chief Executive Officer     |
|                |                                           |
|                | /s/      Bruce      A. Walsh              |
|                | Bruce      A. Walsh                            |
|                | Senior      Vice President and Chief Financial |
|                | Officer                                        |
| March      24, 2008 |                                           |

----
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID** 07727 **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 07727\07727_Checklist.xlsx EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

07727\07727_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 07727\07727_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 07727\07727_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 07727\07727_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 07727\07727_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 07727\07727_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 07727\07727_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

07727\AEP CR 07727 Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement x 07727\Follow up\07727 Follow Up Questions & Answers.docx Draft Questions for Follow Up x 07727\Follow up\07727 Response 030411.pdf Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 07727\Follow up\EPA ICR Questionnaire Follow-up Response for AEP Clinch River Plant- PART C- Fly

Ash Only.pdf Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 07727\Follow up\EPA ICR Questionnaire Follow-up Response for AEP Clinch River Plant- PART C- Fly

Ash Only.rtf Draft Questions for Follow Up 07727\Supplemental Documents\07727_A5-2 Aerial Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 07727\Supplemental Documents\07727_A5-2 USGS Map-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 07727\Supplemental Documents\07727_A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

07727\Supplemental Documents\07727_AEP ELGs ICR submittal letter 10-13-10.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 07727\Supplemental Documents\07727_D3-1 Diagram D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 07727\Supplemental Documents\07727_D3-1 Diagram D-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 07727\Supplemental Documents\07727_D3-1 Diagram D-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 07727\Supplemental Documents\07727_D3-1 Diagram D-4.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLICACCOUNTANTS

 

 

We have issued our report dated February 16,2004, accompanying the consolidated financial statements of SavientPharmaceuticals, Inc. as of and for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003included in the Annual Report of Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2003.  Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in theregistration statements No. 33-51202, 33-83904, 33-69870, 33-41591, 33-41593,333-36121, 333-33073, 333-33075, 333-64541, and 333-87344 on Form S-8 ofSavient Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

 

 
| /s/ Grant Thornton LLP |
|------------------------|
| New York, New York     |
| March 12, 2004         |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 43293]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21377]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-103; RM-9030]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Shawsville, VA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Grace Communications L.C., 
allots Channel 273A to Shawsville, Virginia, as the community's first 
local aural transmission service.  See 62 FR 15870, April 3, 1997. 
Channel 273A can be allotted to Shawsville in compliance with the 
Commission's minimum distance separation requirements with a site 
restriction of 2.3 kilometers (1.4 miles) west in order to avoid a 
short-spacing conflict with the vacant allotment of Channel 274C1, 
Appomattox, Virginia. The coordinates for Channel 273A at Shawsville 
are 37-09-47 NL and 80-16-48 WL. With this action, this proceeding is 
terminated.

DATES: Effective September 22, 1997. The window period for filing 
applications for Channel 273A at Shawsville will open on September 22, 
1997, and close on October 23, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 97-103, adopted July 30, 1997, and 
released August 8, 1997. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

 PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.

Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Virginia, is 
amended by adding Shawsville, Channel 273A.

Federal Communications Commissions.
John A. Karousos,
 Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-21377 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Danial GETTRIDGE.

No. 61293.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1978.

In re: Danial Gettridge applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of Orleans.

Denied.
114 STAT. 2776 PUBLIC LAW 106–558—DEC. 21, 2000

Public Law 106–558

106th Congress

An Act

To amend the National Forest and Public Lands of Nevada Enhancement Act

of 1988 to adjust the boundary of the Toiyabe National Forest, Nevada, and

to amend chapter 55 of title 5, United States Code, to authorize equal overtime

pay provisions for all Federal employees engaged in wildland fire suppression

operations.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF BOUNDARY OF THE TOIYABE NATIONAL

FOREST, NEVADA.

Section 4(a) of the National Forest and Public Lands of Nevada

Enhancement Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 2750) is amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘Effective’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) Effective’’;

and

(2) by adding at the end the following:

‘‘(2) Effective on the date of enactment of this paragraph, the

portion of the land transferred to the Secretary of Agriculture

under paragraph (1) situated between the lines marked ‘Old Forest

Boundary’ and ‘Revised National Forest Boundary’ on the map

entitled ‘Nevada Interchange ‘‘A’’, Change 1’, and dated September

16, 1998, is transferred to the Secretary of the Interior.’’.

SEC. 2. OVERTIME PAY FOR CERTAIN FIREFIGHTERS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5542(a) of title 5, United States Code,

is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘(5) Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2), for an

employee of the Department of the Interior or the United

States Forest Service in the Department of Agriculture engaged

in emergency wildland fire suppression activities, the overtime

hourly rate of pay is an amount equal to one and one-half

times the hourly rate of basic pay of the employee, and all

that amount is premium pay.’’.

Dec. 21, 2000

[S. 439]

PUBLIC LAW 106–558—DEC. 21, 2000 114 STAT. 2777

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 439:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106–746 (Comm. on Resources).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 106–205 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 145 (1999): Nov. 19, considered and passed Senate.

Vol. 146 (2000): Oct. 23, considered and passed House, amended.

Dec. 7, Senate concurred in House amendments.

Æ

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section

shall take effect on the first day of the first applicable pay period

beginning on or after the end of the 30-day period beginning on

the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply only to

funds appropriated after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Approved December 21, 2000.

5 USC 5542 note.
#### Blumberger, Appellant, *v.*Bernot.

*Appeals*— Assignments *of error*— Filing *with prothonotan-y*— Evi*dence*— Rules *22, 26 and 60.*

An appeal will be dismissed where the assignments of error have not been filed with the prothonotary as required by Bule 60.

An assignment of error which includes more than one bill of exception violates Buie 22.

An assignment of error to the admission of exhibits will not be considered, where they were neither objected to when admitted nor made the subject of motions to strike out.

When the court overrules an objection to a question put to a witness, an assignment of error to such ruling which fails to set forth the answer to the question, violates Buie 26.

Argued April 14,1926.

Appeal No. 34, April T., 1926, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Indiana County, September T., 1924, No. 120, in the case of I. Blumberger v. Josef Biernot.

Before Por,ter, P. J., Henderson, Trexler,, Keller, Linn, Gawthrop, and Cunningham, JJ.

Affirmed.

Judgment by confession opened and case tried. Before Langham, P. J.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.

Verdict for defendant and judgment thereon. Plaintiff appealed.

*Errors assigned*were the various rulings on evidence and the charge of the court.

*32
      *John L. Getty,*for appellant.

*E. Walker Smith,*for appellee.

April 30, 1926:

Per Curiam,

Appellant had judgment lagainst defendant by confession; it was opened to permit a defense to be made; on the trial of the issue, the jury found for defendant; plaintiff has appealed from judgment on the verdict.

The conclusion we have reached after considering the briefs and the record renders it unnecessary to enlarge upon the matters there presented. The appeal must be dismissed because no assignments of error were ever filed with the Prothonotary of this court; Bule 60 requires that they be filed. Assignments of error constitute the substantial pleading left in this court iafter the record is returned to the court below: Landis v. Evans, 113 Pa. 332.

We have nevertheless examined the assignments printed in the brief, but may not sustain them. The first complains of the admission severally of four exhibits, in violation of Buie 22 which prohibits the grouping of more than one bill of exceptions in one assignment; and when we turned ’to the record we found that several of the exhibits complained of in the assignment were neither objected to when admitted nor made the subject of motions to strike out.

The second assignment fails to comply with Buie 26; it complains that the court overruled appellant’s objection to a question put to a witness. The answer is not given in the assignment as it should have been, nor is any answer to the question found on the pages of the record referred to in the assignment.

The third assignment, a general complaint against the charge, is made the basis of an argument in the *33brief that the charge was ‘ ‘ misleading and erroneons ’ ’; we are not impressed with the argument.

While we have considered the case as indicated, we dismiss the appeal for failure to file (assignments of error.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Anne Walker CHAMBERS v. Wayne P. PARKER, Registrar of the Bureau of Vital Statistics of the City of New Orleans.

No. 60784.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 1977.

In re: Wayne Parker, etc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 349 So.2d 424.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS, J., dissents from the denial.