alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 153 (Friday, August 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21001]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-5482-9]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7167 OR (202) 564-7153.
    Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements filed July 28, 
1997 through August 1, 1997, pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

EIS No. 970295, Draft EIS, BLM, WY, Jonah Field II Natural Gas 
Development Project, Exploration, Development and Production, 
Applications for Permit to Drill, Right-of-Way Grant, COE Section 404 
Permit and NPDES Permit, Pinedale Resource Area and Green River 
Resource Area, Rock Spring District, Sublette County, WY, Due: 
September 22, 1997, Contact: Arlan Hiner (307) 352-0206.
EIS No. 970296, Draft EIS, BLM, HI, Ala Kahakai ``Trail By the Sea'' 
National Trail Study, Implementation, Hawaii Island, Hawaii County, HI, 
Due: October 7, 1997, Contact: Meredith Kaplan (415) 427-1438.
EIS No. 970297, Draft EIS, NRCS, NB, KS, Turkey Creek Watershed Plan, 
Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention, Johnson, Pawnee Counties, NB 
and Marshall and Nemaha Counties, KS, Due: September 22, 1997, Contact: 
Craig R. Derickson (402) 437-4112.
EIS No. 970298, Draft EIS, INS, CA, Service Processing Center (SPC) for 
Detainees, Construction and Operation, Possible Sites, Stockton and 
Tracy Sites, San Joaquin Counties, CA, Due: September 22, 1997, 
Contact: William A. Kopitz (202) 307-1877.
EIS No. 970299, Final EIS, FHW, AL, Birmingham Northern Beltline 
Project, Construction, I-59/20 west to I-59 northeast in the City of 
Birmingham, Funding and Possible COE Section 404 Permit, Jefferson 
County, AL, Due: September 8, 1997, Contact: Joe D. Wilkerson (334) 
223-7370.
EIS No. 970300, Final EIS, DOE, NV, AZ, NM, Navajo Transmission Project 
(NTP), Construction, Operation and Maintenance, Right-of-Way Grants, 
EPA NPDES, COE, FAA, FWS and FHW Permits Issuance, NV, NM and AZ, Due: 
September 8, 1997, Contact: Nick Chevance (303) 275-1713.
EIS No. 970301, Final EIS, UAF, TX, Reese Air Force Base (AFB) Disposal 
and Reuse, Implementation, NPDES Permit and COE Section 404 Permit, 
Lubbock and Terry Counties, TX, Due: September 30, 1997, Contact: 
Robert Lopez (210) 536-6545.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 970280, Final EIS, FRC, MA, NH, ME, Portland Natural Gas 
Transmission System (PNGTS)/Maritimes Phase I Joint Facilities Project, 
NPDES Permit, COE Section 10 and 404 Permits, Dracut, MA; Wells, ME and 
NH, Due: August 25, 1997, Contact: Paul McKee (202) 208-1088. Published 
FR 07-25-97 Correction to Title.

    Dated: August 5, 1997.
William D. Dickerson,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 97-21001 Filed 8-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Microfluidics International Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael C. Ferrara, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:



/s/ MICHAEL C. FERRARA Michael C. Ferrara
Chief Executive Officer


Date:
March 29, 2010

---



QuickLinks
CONTACT:






Stewart
                E. McClure, Jr.
            Gerard
                RikerPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer
            EVP
                and Chief Financial Officer(908)
                630- 5000
            (908)
                630-5018








PRESS
      RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE




**SOMERSET
      HILLS BANCORP ANNOUNCES STOCK**


**RE-PURCHASE
      PROGRAM**







BERNARDSVILLE,
      NJ - February
      28 ,
      2007. Somerset
      Hills Bancorp (NASDAQ  “SOMH”) announced today that its Board of Directors
      had approved a stock re-purchase program pursuant to which the Company may
      re-purchase up to 250,000 shares of its outstanding common stock. Under the
      program, re-purchases may be made from time to time in the open market or in
      privately negotiated transactions at such prices as management of the Company
      deems appropriate.




Mr.
      Stewart E. McClure, Jr., the President and Chief Executive Officer of the
      Company stated: “We believe that this buy back program is an appropriate use of
      our capital to enhance shareholder value and liquidity in our
      stock.”





Somerset
      Hills Bancorp is a bank holding company for Somerset Hills Bank, a full service
      commercial bank with offices in Bernardsville, Madison, Mendham, Morristown,
      and
      Summit, New Jersey.  The Company has announced plans to open two additional
      offices in Long Valley and Stirling, New Jersey.  Somerset Hills Bank
      focuses its lending activities on small to medium sized businesses, high net
      worth individuals, professional practices, and consumer and retail
      customers.  The Bank operates a licensed mortgage company subsidiary,
      Sullivan Financial Services, Inc. and also operates Somerset Hills Wealth
      Management Services, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary licensed to provide
      financial services, including financial planning, insurance (life, health,
      property and casualty), mutual funds and annuities for individuals and
      commercial accounts, and Somerset Hills Title Group, LLC, which, with its
      partner, Property Title Group, provides title services in connection with the
      closing of real estate transactions.  The common stock of the Company is
      traded on NASDAQ under the symbol SOMH.  You can visit our website at www.somersethillsbank.com .
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1154 

To extend the Acadia National Park Advisory Commission, to provide 

improved visitor services at the park, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2005 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself and Ms. SNOWE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL

To extend the Acadia National Park Advisory Commission, 

to provide improved visitor services at the park, and 

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Acadia National Park 

5 Improvement Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF ACADIA NATIONAL PARK ADVISORY 

7 COMMISSION. 

8 Section 103(f) of Public Law 99–420 (16 U.S.C. 341 

9 note) is amended by striking ‘‘20’’ and inserting ‘‘40’’. 
2

•S 1154 IS

1 SEC. 3. INCREASE IN LAND ACQUISITION CEILING. 

2 Section 106(a) of Public Law 99–420 (16 U.S.C. 341 

3 note) is amended by striking ‘‘$9,100,000’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘$28,000,000’’. 

5 SEC. 4. INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION CENTER. 

6 Title I of Public Law 99–420 (16 U.S.C. 341 note) 

7 is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 

8 ‘‘SEC. 108. INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION CENTER. 

9 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall provide as10 sistance in the planning, construction, and operation of 

11 an intermodal transportation center located outside of the 

12 boundary of the Park in the town of Trenton, Maine to 

13 improve the management, interpretation, and visitor en14 joyment of the Park. 

15 ‘‘(b) AGREEMENTS.—To carry out subsection (a), in 

16 administering the intermodal transportation center, the 

17 Secretary may enter into interagency agreements with 

18 other Federal agencies, and cooperative agreements, under 

19 appropriate terms and conditions, with State and local 

20 agencies, and nonprofit organizations— 

21 ‘‘(1) to provide exhibits, interpretive services 

22 (including employing individuals to provide such 

23 services), and technical assistance; 

24 ‘‘(2) to conduct activities that facilitate the dis25 semination of information relating to the Park and 

26 the Island Explorer transit system; 
3

•S 1154 IS

1 ‘‘(3) to provide financial assistance for the con2 struction of the intermodal transportation center in 

3 exchange for space in the center that is sufficient to 

4 interpret the Park; and 

5 ‘‘(4) to assist with the operation and mainte6 nance of the intermodal transportation center. 

7 ‘‘(c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be 

9 appropriated to the Secretary such sums as are nec10 essary to carry out this section (including planning, 

11 design and construction of the intermodal transpor12 tation center). 

13 ‘‘(2) OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE.—There 

14 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are 

15 necessary to maintain and operate the intermodal 

16 transportation center.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from the third quarter
1998 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by references to such 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                          22,241
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   89,089
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,422
<INVENTORY>                                     57,961
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               183,730
<PP&E>                                         242,552
<DEPRECIATION>                                 106,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 463,775
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,403
<BONDS>                                        100,714
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,694
<OTHER-SE>                                     227,292
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   463,775
<SALES>                                        481,568
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               481,568
<CGS>                                          355,719
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  355,719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                65,995
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,567
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 54,967
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,361
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,606
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,606
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.82
        

</TABLE>
#### C. A. HOBBS, Jr., Lauryce G. Hobbs and C. A. Hobbs, Jr., Inc., Appellants. v. FLORIDA FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF JACKSONVILLE, Appellee.

No. FF-213.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 30, 1977.

Jere D. McWinn, Jacksonville, for appellants.

John B. Kent, of Kent, Sears, Durden & Kent, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Whether the “counterclaims” sought by appellant to be belatedly filed were “permissible” or “compulsory” within the meaning of those terms as used in the Rules of Civil Procedure is a rabbit trail which we do not elect to pursue, nor is it necessary that that issue be now or here resolved. We do find, however, that the summary judgment of foreclosure of real property here appealed was properly entered (insofar as are concerned the points presented on appeal). Accordingly, no prejudicial error having been demonstrated, the said summary final judgment of foreclosure is

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MILLS, JJ., concur.
No. 99-7909.

#### Sindram *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                              HARTMARX CORPORATION
                       STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
                         (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIOS)
                                  (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 30,
                                       ----------------------------------------------
                                         2000    1999/(1)/   1998     1997     1996
                                       -------  ----------  -------  -------  -------
<S>                                    <C>      <C>         <C>      <C>      <C>
Earnings from continuing
 operations before provision for
 income taxes per Consolidated
 Statement of Earnings                 $14,565     $ 2,545  $23,585  $16,545  $ 7,700

Add:
   Interest Expense                     15,686      17,669   18,633   17,480   16,681
   Portion of rents representative
    of the interest factor/(a)/          3,277       3,565    3,622    3,736    3,424
                                       ----------------------------------------------
Income as adjusted                     $33,528     $23,779  $45,840  $37,761  $27,805
                                       ==============================================

Fixed charges:

   Interest expense                    $15,686     $17,669  $18,633  $17,480  $16,681

   Portion of rents representative
    of the interest factor /(a)/         3,277       3,565    3,622    3,736    3,424
                                       ----------------------------------------------
Fixed charges                          $18,963     $21,234  $22,255  $21,216  $20,105
                                       ==============================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges        1.77        1.12     2.06     1.78     1.38
                                       ==============================================
</TABLE>


(1) 1999 earnings from continuing operations before provision for income taxes
    includes a non-cash writedown of systems development costs of $11,195.
    Excluding this charge, income as adjusted would have been $34,974 and the
    ratio of earnings to fixed charges would have been 1.65.

(a) Represents one-third of rent expense which management believes represents a
    reasonable approximation of the interest component of rent expense.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1162 

To amend titles 10 and 38, United States Code, to repeal the 10-year 

limits on use of Montgomery GI Bill educational assistance benefits, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2005 

Ms. CANTWELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend titles 10 and 38, United States Code, to repeal 

the 10-year limits on use of Montgomery GI Bill educational assistance benefits, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Montgomery GI Bill 

5 for Life Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•S 1162 IS 

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF 10-YEAR LIMIT ON USE OF VETERANS’ 

2 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE BENEFITS. 

3 (a) ALL-VOLUNTEER FORCE EDUCATIONAL ASSIST4 ANCE PROGRAM.—Section 3031 of title 38, United States 

5 Code, is repealed. 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

7 (1) Section 3018C(e)(3)(B) of such title is 

8 amended— 

9 (A) by striking ‘‘(B)(i)’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘(B)’’; and 

11 (B) by striking clause (ii). 

12 (2) Section 3020 of such title is amended— 

13 (A) in subsection (f)(1), by striking ‘‘Sub14 ject to the time limitation for use of entitlement 

15 under section 3031 of this title, an’’ and insert16 ing ‘‘An’’; and 

17 (B) in subsection (h)(5), by striking ‘‘Not18 withstanding section 3031 of this title, a’’ and 

19 inserting ‘‘A’’. 

20 (3) The heading for subchapter IV of chapter 

21 30 of such title is amended to read as follows: 

22 ‘‘Subchapter IV—General and 

23 Administrative Provisions’’. 

24 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The chapter analysis 

25 at the beginning of chapter 30 of such title is amended 

26 by striking the matter relating to the heading for sub-
3 

•S 1162 IS 

1 chapter IV and the item relating to section 3031 and in2 serting the following: 

‘‘SUBCHAPTER IV—GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE 

PROVISIONS’’. 

3 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF 10-YEAR LIMIT ON USE OF SELECTED 

4 RESERVE EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE BENE5 FITS. 

6 (a) REPEAL.—Section 16133 of title 10, United 

7 States Code, is repealed. 

8 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

9 at the beginning of chapter 1606 of title 10, United States 

10 Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 

11 16133. 

Æ
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Jeff
      Criswell, President of Cyberads, Inc. (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





This
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,
      2006,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"), fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      December 13, 2006




/s/
      JEFF CRISWELL


Jeff
      Criswell


President
### N UMBER 13

- 1 2

- 00 52 1

- C R



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

ALFREDO PEREZ JR. Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee.

On appeal from the 24th District Court

of Victoria County, Texas

.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria

By one issue, appellant, Alfredo Perez, Jr., appeals his conviction for engaging in

organized criminal activity. See T EX

. P ENAL C ODE A NN

. § 71.02 (West Supp. 2011). We

affirm.2 I. B ACKGROUND

Appellant was indicted and pled guilty to one count of engaging in organized

criminal activity. See id. The trial court found appellant guilty and assessed a 17

- year

prison term. This appeal ensued.

II. A NALYSIS

In one issue, appellant argues that the trial court violated his constitutional rights

by imposing an excessive sentence that was disproportion ate to the gravity of the

offense.

A. Applicable Law

The Eighth Amendment provides that “[e]xcessive bail shall not be required, nor

excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” U.S. C ONST

.

amend. VIII. Even though within the r ange permitted by law, a sentence may

nonetheless be disproportionate to the gravity of the offense. See Ex parte Chavez

,

213 S.W.3d 320, 323

– 24 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

To preserve error for appellate review, the complaining party must present a

timely and specific objection to the trial court, and obtain a ruling. T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

33.1(a). A party’s failure to specifically object to an alleged disproportionate or cruel

and unusual sentence in the trial court or in a post

- trial motion waives any error f or the

purposes of appellate review. See Rhoades v. State , 934 S.W.2d 113, 120 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1996); Noland v. State , 264 S.W.3d 144, 151 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.]

2007, pet. ref’d) (“[I]n order to preserve for appellate review a complaint that a s entence

is grossly disproportionate, constituting cruel and unusual punishment, a defendant3

must present to the trial court a timely request, objection, or motion stating the specific

grounds for the ruling desired.”).

B. Discussion

Having reviewed the r ecord, we note that appellant did not object to an alleged

disproportionate or cruel and unusual sentence in the trial court or in a post

- trial motion.

Accordingly, appellant has waived an y error for purposes of appella t e review. See

Rhoades , 934 S.W.2d at 120; Noland , 264 S.W.3d at 151. Appellant’s issue is

overruled.

III. C ONCLUSION

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

_______________________ NORA L. LONGORIA

Justice

Do not p ublish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b)

.

Delivered and filed the

14th day of March , 2013

.
No. 99-5951.

#### Radillo-Contreras *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and ease remanded for further consideration in light of *Roe*v. *Flores-Ortega, ante,*p. 470.
#### Roy Allen FALIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2156.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 27, 1977.

Grusmark, Jaffe & Karten, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Lorenzo v. Blackburn,*74 So.2d 289 (Fla.1954); *Ballengee*v. *State,*144 So.2d 68 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962); *Brizzie v. State,*120 So.2d 27 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960).