alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                             WALL DATA INCORPORATED
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            Year Ended December 31,
                                                                 ---------------------------------------------
                                                                    1996             1995              1994
                                                                 ----------       ----------       -----------
<S>                                                              <C>              <C>              <C>      
PRIMARY
    Average shares outstanding                                    9,058,380        9,223,949         8,983,049
    Net effect of dilutive stock options based on the
       treasury stock method using average market price             466,288          626,921         1,140,712
    Dilutive effect of Convertible Preferred Stock                       --               --                --
                                                                 ==========       ==========       ===========
    Total weighted average shares outstanding                     9,524,668        9,850,870        10,123,761
                                                                 ==========       ==========       ===========

    Net income                                                   $4,193,000       $7,251,000       $14,184,000
                                                                 ==========       ==========       ===========

    Net income per share                                         $     0.44       $     0.74       $      1.40
                                                                 ==========       ==========       ===========

FULLY DILUTED
    Average shares outstanding                                    9,058,380        9,223,949         8,983,049
    Net effect of dilutive stock options based on the
       treasury stock method using the period-end market 
       price, if higher than average market price                   466,288          626,921         1,140,712
    Dilutive effect of note payable                                      --               --            42,662
                                                                 ==========       ==========       ===========
    Total weighted average shares outstanding                     9,524,668        9,850,870        10,166,423
                                                                 ==========       ==========       ===========

    Net income                                                   $4,193,000       $7,251,000       $14,184,000
                                                                 ==========       ==========       ===========

    Net income per share                                         $     0.44       $     0.74       $      1.40
                                                                 ==========       ==========       ===========
</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21320]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-2913-001]

Pennsylvania Power & Light Company; Notice of Filing

August 7, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 18, 1997, Pennsylvania Power & Light 
Company (PP&L), filed a Refund Report July 18, 1997, in connection with 
a late-filed Service Agreement with Koch Power Services, Inc. (KPSI) 
for the sale of capacity and/or energy under PP&L's Short Term Capacity 
and/or energy Sales Tariff. The Service Agreement adds KPSI as an 
eligible customer under the Tariff.
    PP&L states that copies of this filing have been supplied to KPSI 
and to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before August 20, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21320 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
Exhibit 21.1

                                        Subsidiaries of Azul Holdings Inc.


A.       52.5% owned subsidiary of Azul Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation:

         1.       Xyvision Enterprise Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation

B.       Wholly owned subsidiaries of Xyvision Enterprise Solutions, Inc.:

                                                               Jurisdiction
                                      Name                    of organization

         1.       Xyvision Enterprise Solutions GMBH           Germany
         2.       Xyvision Enterprise Solutions Sarl           France
         3.       Xyvision Enterprise Solutions Europe Ltd.    United Kingdom
         4.       Lightbinders Inc.                            Delaware
#### Ex parte Dennis Aaron DAVIS.

No. 77-48.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 2, 1977.

BEATTY, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES and SHORES, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21420]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental Research; Notice of a Meeting of the 
National Advisory Dental Research Council

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of a 
teleconference meeting of the National Advisory Dental Research 
Council, National Institute of Dental Research, on September 9, 1997, 
Conference Room 10, Sixth Floor, Building 31, National Institutes of 
Health, Bethesda, Maryland. This meeting will be open to the public 
from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. for general discussion and program 
presentations. Attendance by the public will be limited to space 
available.
    In accordance with the provisions set forth in secs. 552(c)(4) and 
552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. and sec. 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, the 
meeting of the Council will be closed to the public on September 9, 
11:00 a.m. to adjournment for the review, discussion and evaluation of 
individual grant applications. These applications and information 
concerning individuals associated with the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal applications and reports, the disclosure of 
which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal 
privacy.
    Dr. Dushanka V. Kleinman, Executive Secretary, National Advisory 
Dental Research Council, and Deputy Director, National Institute of 
Dental Research, National Institutes of Health, Building 31, Room 2C39, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892, (telephone (301) 496-9469) will furnish a 
roster of committee members, a summary of the meeting, and other 
information pertaining to the meeting upon request. Individuals who 
plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language 
interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact the 
Executive Secretary listed above in advance of the meeting.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research)

    Dated: August 7, 1997.
LaVerne Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-21420 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

}" !(

Blue Ridge Dam

U.S.

Forest

Service

Dry

Azure

Point

Beacon

Point

Blue Ridge

Marina

")60

Old Hwy 76

Aska Rd

7

8

8

9

4

2

1 1

5

3

41

40

10

42

39

11

6

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000

Feet /

Tile: A1

Jul 24, 2008 Blue Ridge Reservoir

Land Management Plan

\\alismurphy\home\mprlm\projects\landplan\Maps\Blue Ridge_land_plan\BlueRidge_land_plan WEB.mxd
No. 00-6659.

#### Steele *v.*Beary et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-58653, 33-30549, 33-03169, 33-49422, 333-107065
and 333-1076680) of Hartmarx Corporation of our report dated March 30, 2005
relating to management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting which appears in this Form 10-K/A.



/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 30, 2005
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-10-0486 SAT Date: 8/17/2010 Print Date: 8/31/2011

Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 2

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ;

P 2 Rec Comments : Comment: N o Commen t
Keywords : Keywords: IRR-E,S,MM,L LUNG AQUATOX-A,C Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-10-0486-87 FATE: MW = 646 with 14.8% < 500 and 93% < 1000 Solid S = Disp.VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = 25-90; OECD 301F( Mano Resp): 18.87-4.40%/28d;OECD302A(Porous Pot): 41% removal; OECD301F(Mano Resp):42.4-64.2%/28D; OECD301B(ModSturm CO2 ev): 86.1-96.1%OECD301A(Ready Biodeg): 10.9-54.5%/28d. Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk Sorption to soils/sediments = low - moderate PBT Potential: P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = moderate

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor from the skin, moderate from the GI tract, and good from the lung, based on analogs. There are concerns for surfactant effects on the lung, and for irritation to the eye, skin (chronic), mucous membranes and lung, based on surfactant properties of the compound.

Ecotox :

Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 2.6 daphnid 48-h LC50 1.8 green algal 96-h EC50 <6.8 fish

_ chronic value 0.40 ACR 6.5 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.28 ACR 6.5 algal

_ chronic value <1.7 ACR 4 Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value

_ Ecotox Values Comments: Predicted based on SARs for anionic surfactants; Ecotox chemical class: surfactant-anionic-C15-SO4; MW 646 with 93% < 1000 and 14.8% < 500; solid with mp = unknown; S = dispersible in water at 25 C (P); p H7; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; ECs based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 28

SARs anionic surfactant SAR Class surfactant-anionic-C15-SO4
Ecotox Factors Comments:SAT Chair: J. Kwiat
#### Jean CASIMIR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1486.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 22, 1977.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Paul Morris, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arthur Joel Berger, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, NATHAN and KEHOE, JJ.

*144PER CURIAM.

In this case, we are called upon to decide whether the evidence relied upon by the state in support of the second degree murder charge was sufficient, substantial, and competent to sustain the defendant’s conviction. We have concluded that there was substantial competent evidence to support the guilty verdict rendered by the jury; accordingly, the judgment and sentence entered by the trial court are affirmed.

Appellant, defendant below, contends that the facts surrounding the incident are unclear and contradictory and that his guilt was not conclusively established.

We have carefully examined and considered the transcript of testimony and the evidence offered and conclude that, while some of the testimony may have been unclear and confusing, there was substantial, competent evidence to support the jury verdict. *Songer*v. *State,*322 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1975). Therefore, because appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error, his conviction for murder in the second degree is affirmed.

Affirmed.
# ...

In The Matter Of: NORTHEASTERN AVIATION, CORP. Respondent 

## SERVED: May 14,2013

) ) ) ) ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2012-1264
CaseNo. 2012EA110030



### ORDERRESETTING RULE 16 LITIGATION SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ';. cc '. ,_i ·.)

OnMarch 7, 2013, an Order Resetting Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference and Directing Rule 26(±) Planning and Submission was filed. This Orderreset the Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference to Monday, May 20, 2013, at 11:00 a.m. andthe deadline for the parties to file theirRule 26(±), proposed scheduling/discoveryplan to May 13, 2013. On Aprill9, 2013, the parties filed aJointly Proposed Scheduling/Discovery Plan. On May 13, 2013, Complainant's Counsel contacted Office ofHearings attorney staffto requestpostponement ofthe Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference because ofan unavoidable scheduling conflictwith a separate matter. Complainant's Counsel stated that Respondent's Counsel did not object to rescheduling the Conference and provided mutually agreed alternate dates for consideration. 

### IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference previously set for May 20, 2013, at 11:00 a.m. is reset to 

### Tuesday, June 4, 2013, 

### at 11:00 

### a.m. Eastern time.

Attaclunent: Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL

Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 ORIGINAL & ONE COPY

Attention: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1

Mr. Zachary M. Berman, Esq. 

### Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel EasternRegion Federal AviationAdministration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3258 FPCX: 718-995-5699 Mr. James Ehrig, Esq. 

### Respondent's Counsel ONE COPY

Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellot, LLC 1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, 12thFloor Washington, DC 20006-4604 TEL: 202-659-6672 FAX: 202-659-6699 jehrig@eckertseamans.com Judge J.E. Sullivan, 

### US. Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2012-1264 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Exhibit




















AMENDMENT TO 
CONVERGYS CORPORATION RETIREMENT AND SAVINGS PLAN
(PPA RESTATEMENT)


This is an Amendment to the Convergys Corporation Retirement and Savings Plan (the "Plan"), as last restated effective January 1, 2013.
Recitals
		
	I.
	Convergys Corporation (the "Corporation") maintains the Plan and has reserved the right to amend the Plan from time to time in its discretion.


		
	II.
	The Corporation wishes to modify the Plan to provide for the merger of the Stream Employees' 401(k) Retirement & Savings Plan into the Plan effective May 15, 2015.


Amendment
1.    A new Section 1.4.3 is added to the Plan, to provide as follows:
1.4.3  Effective May 15, 2015 (the "Merger Date"), the Stream Employees' 401(k) Retirement & Savings Plan (the "Stream Plan") was merged into the Plan.  All assets and liabilities in the Stream Plan were consequently transferred to and made a part of the Plan.  As of the merger date, and unless the Plan specifically provides otherwise, the terms of the Plan shall govern in all respects, including but not limited to eligibility age and service requirements, the designation of a beneficiary and withdrawals of Plan Accounts during employment.
2.    The second sentence of Section 3.5 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:


For purposes of this Section 3.5, "Predecessor Entity" includes NICE Corporation, Automated Phone Exchange Incorporated, Telephone Marketing Services, Inc., Ameritel Corporation, Waveland Associates, Inc., ADI Research, Inc., WATS Marketing of America, Inc., Software Support, Inc., Maritz, Inc., American Transtech, Inc. ("ATI"), Geneva Technology Inc., Stream International, Inc., Software Spectrum, Inc., Stream New York, Inc., Global BPO and eTelecare Global Solutions - US.


3.    Section 7.2 of the Plan is hereby amended with the addition of the following at the end thereof:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, that portion of a Participant's Account attributable to amounts transferred from the Stream Plan shall continue to be subject to the vesting schedule specified in the Stream Plan as in effect immediately prior to its merger into the Plan.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Convergys Corporation has hereunto caused its name to be subscribed this ___ day of _____________, 2015.











CONVERGYS CORPORATION






 By                        


Title:_______________________________






984785.1
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


In
      connection with the Annual Report of Oak Hill Financial, Inc. (the "Registrant")
      on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R. E. Coffman,
      Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:




(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Registrant.




*/s/
      R. E. Coffman, Jr.*




R.
      E.
      Coffman, Jr.


President
      & Chief Executive Officer




August
      7,
      2007








7
#### Kathryn BAGLEY and John Bagley, her husband, Appellants, v. DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, d/b/a Metropolitan Transit Agency, Appellee.

No. 76-1004.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 13, 1977.

Horton, Perse *&*Ginsberg, Stanley M. Rosenblatt, Miami, for appellants.

*177Stuart L. Simon, County Atty., and Thomas Goldstein, Asst. County Atty., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellants, plaintiffs below, bring this appeal from a final judgment dated May 3, 1976, in favor of appellee rendered pursuant to the trial court’s direction of a verdict at the conclusion of all of the evidence. The sole point raised on appeal is whether the trial court erred in holding that under no view the jury might lawfully take of the evidence could a verdict in favor of appellants be sustained under the law relating to the common carrier-passenger-sudden stop-injury context.

The principles, upon which motions for directed verdicts may be granted, are well established. See, e. g., *Riviera Condominium Apts. v. Weinberger,*231 So.2d 850 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970); *McCabe v. Watson,*225 So.2d 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); *Chowning v. Pierce,*174 So.2d 42 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965); and *Deese*v. *White Belt Dairy Farms, Inc.,*160 So.2d 543 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964). We have carefully reviewed the record in the instant appeal and, based upon these principles, have concluded that the trial court erred in granting appellee’s motion for a directed verdict and in entering the final judgment in favor of appellee. Our review of the record shows that there was conflicting testimony which, if resolved by the jury in favor of appellants, could have sustained their cause of action. See, e. g., *Wright v. City of St. Petersburg,*291 So.2d 639 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974); *City of Coral Gables v. Patty,*162 So.2d 530 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); and *Blackman*v. *Miami Transit Co.,*125 So.2d 128 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960).

Therefore, the final judgment appealed is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMI NAL AP PEALS OF TENNES SEE AT JAC KSON A ssi gne d onBr ie fs N ove m be r 6, 200 7 STATE OF TENNESS EE v . CHRISTOP HER

CA RN EY and A NTH ONYMITC HELL Direc t Appeal from the Circ uit Court for Hayw ood Coun ty Nos. 5814, 5821, & 5844 Clayburn L. Pee ples, Jud ge

No. W2007-00705-C CA-R 3-CD - F iled April 8, 2008

J A M ES C UR WO OD W I TT , J R ., J ., co n cu rr i n g.

Iconcur in the results b u t woul d have de fer red to the tria l court’s rationale for dis mis sin g the ind ic tme nts ha d it a va ile d th e State a

pr ior op po rt un ity to r e sis t th e dis mis sa l.
J AMES CURW OOD WI TT, J R., J UDGE
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 152 (Thursday, August 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20800]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-430-000]


Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

August 1, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 29, 1997, Texas Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Gas) tendered for filing the following revised 
tariff sheets to its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No.1:

Second Revised Twenty-first Revised Sheet No. 10
Second Revised Fourth Revised Sheet No. 10A
Second Revised Eighteenth Revised Sheet No. 11

    The revised tariff sheets are being filed to suspend collection of 
the GSR surcharges collected from its NNS, FT, and SGT customers 
pursuant to Section 33.3 of Texas Gas' General Terms and Conditions. 
The current GSR surcharges resulted from Texas Gas' settlement in 
Docket No. RP94-119-000, et al., which was accepted by Commission 
Letter Order dated September 18, 1995. Upon the payments of June 
invoices by transportation customers, Texas Gas will have fully 
recovered the portion of its GSR costs which are allocated to firm 
services in accordance with the provisions of the settlement, which are 
detailed in Section 33.3 of the General Terms and Conditions.
    Texas Gas requests an effective date of July 1, 1997, for the 
proposed tariff sheets.
    Copies of the revised tariff sheets are being mailed to Texas Gas' 
affected jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding.
    Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20800 Filed 8-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M