BOBBY JINDAL

GOVERNOR

PEGGY M. HATCH

SECRETARY

~tate of lLouisiana

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

September 2,2010

Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief

Air Planning Section

U. S. EPA Region 6 (6-PDL)

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200

Dallas, Texas 75202-2733

r.: r~~

.".',

;.,,, .' ';

Re: Section 185 Fee Determination ofTermination, Baton Rouge Nonattainment Area

Technical Amendment

Dear Mr. Donaldson:

Enclosed you will find a technical amendment to the Section 185 Fee Determination of

Termination previously submitted by this agency. This technical amendment presents

materials deemed necessary to substantiate the demonstration that the emissions

reductions previously referenced are both permanent and enforceable.

If you or your staff has any questions concerning this submittal, please contact Vivian

Aucoin, SIP Coordinator at (225) 219-3419 or at vivian.aucoin@la.gov.

c: Sandra Rennie, EPA

Post Office Box 4301 • Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70821-4301 • Phone 225-219-3953 • Fax 225-219-3971
RECEIVEE; -- t)P(jL

AIR F'LANNING SEC.

10 SEP -7 PH 4: 26

Louisiana State Implementation Plan Revision

Section 185 Fee Determination of

Termination, Baton Rouge Nonattainment Area

Technical Amendment

Submitted to:

EPA Region 6

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200

Dallas, Texas 75202-2733

TA, September 2010

DEO LOUI.~
Technical Amendment to Section 185 Penalty Fee

Termination Determination

Based on communications with EPA Region 6, Office of Air Planning, concerning the

permanent and enforceable provisions requirement outlined in the January 5, 2010,

Guidance on Developing Fee Programs Required by Clean Air Act Section 185 for the 1-

hour Ozone NAAQS, the Department is submitting a technical amendment to the Section

185 Penalty Fee Termination Determination SIP revision'. This technical amendment is

comprised of the Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) and the Reasonably Achievable

Control Measures/Reasonable Achievable Control Technology (RACM/RACT) section

that was submitted as part of the Baton Rouge Nonattainment area redesignation request

and maintenance package.

The Department believes the area will maintain its attainment status because of

permanent and enforceable emissions reductions. The latest Reasonable Further Progress

(RFP) report indicates that the area has exceeded the 15% emission reductions for both

the RFP demonstration as well as the 3% contingency demonstration. The calculations

are contained in Appendix G, Reasonable Further Progress--2002 to 2008 RFP

Demonstration. A further indication can be seen in the Reasonably Achievable Control

Measures (RACM)/Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) analysis that was

submitted as a requirement to the redesignation and maintenance plan. This document

outlines both the regulations governing volatile organic compounds and oxides of

nitrogen, and the regulations stemming from the Control Technique Guidelines issued by

EPA. A list offacility applicability is also included. (See Appendix H)

1 The fmal SIP revision, Section 185 Free Determination ofTermination, Baton Rouge Nonattainment

Area, was submitted to EPA on May 18,2010.
,Appendix G

Reasonable Further Progress

2002-2008 '

Section 185 Fee Determination of

Termination, Baton Rouge Nonattainment Area

Technical Amendment

TA, September 2010
2002 TO 2008 RFP DEMONSTRATION

A. INTRODUCTION

On June 15, 2004, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classified the Baton Rouge

Nonattainment Area (BRNA) as marginal for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard with an attainment date of

June 15, 2007. Because the area did not meet the attainment date, the BRNA was re-classified to

moderate with a new attainment date ofJune 15,2010. (72 FR 61315-61320, 10/30/2007)

Phase II of the 1997 8-hour ozone implementation rule states that moderate areas must meet the

Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) requirements under sections 172(c)(2) and 182 of the 1990 Clean Air

. Act Amendments (CAAA). In a memorandum from William T. Harnett ofEPA, which the State received

on August 15, 2006, guidance was provided for calculating RFP for moderate areas that have an approved

15% Rate of Progress (ROP) plan under the I-hour standard and that have an attainment date after 2009.

The guidance states: "These areas are treated like subpart I areas, which must obtain a 15% reduction (can

be for NOx or VOC or a combination of either) for the first 6 years after the baseline year. OTAQ [EPA

Office of Transportation and Air Quality] is developing guidance for this situation. In the meantime, the

State should use Appendix AlMethod 2 (which applies to serious and higher classified areas) except that

instead of demonstrating RFP for a total of 18% emission reductions for the first 6 years, the total would

be 15% due to the moderate classification. See 40 CFR 51.91O(a)(1)(ii)(A), which refers to section

51.91O(b)(2)."

This document details the process and results to show that the state meets the 15% RFP emission

reduction requirements for the period between the 2002 base year through the 2008 RFP milestone year.

Compliance with the 2008 milestone emission reduction requirements are demonstrated by using EPA

guidance, first to calculate the elements of the RFP demonstration and then to use these elements in

conjunction with EPA RFP methodology to demonstrate compliance with RFP reduction requirements.

The required RFP elements are:

• 2002 base year emissions

• 2002 to 2008 non-creditable reductions

• 2002 to 2008 required RFP reductions

• 2008 target level of emissions

• 2002 to 2008 projected emissions growth

• 2008 RFP milestone year projected emissions with growth and controls

• Demonstration of compliance with RFP requirements

• Contingency plan

This document describes how the elements of the BRNA 2008 RFP demonstration are calculated and

used to demonstrate compliance with 2008 RFP requirements. It also provides a summary of the 2008

BRNA RFP demonstration. First, the target level of emissions for 2008 is calculated. Second, the 2008

RFP milestone year emissions with 2002 to 2008 emissions growth and controls are projected. Third, the

2008 target level of emissions is compared to the projected 2008 RFP milestone year emissions in order

429
to demonstrate compliance with the RFP requirements. Finally, in case of a milestone year failure, the

required 3% contingency plan is provided.

B. 2008 TARGET LEVEL CALCULATION

EPA guidance specifies the method states are to use to calculate the maximum amount of emissions a

nonattainment area can emit for an RFP milestone year. The RFP target level of emissions is calculated

with a six-step process.

• Develop the 2002 base year inventory

• Develop the 2002 RFP base year inventory

• Calculate the non-creditable fleet turnover correction

• Develop the adjusted RFP base year inventory for 2002 relative to 2008

• Calculate the 2008 required 15% emissions reduction

• Calculate the 2008 target level of emissions

1. Develop the 2002 Base Year Inventory

EPA guidance specifies the method states must use to develop the base year inventory. Details of the

development of the BRNA 2002 inventory are described in the document "2002 Base Year Emissions

Inventory for the Baton Rouge Nonattainment Area" by LDEQ in June 2007 and submitted to EPA on

July 20,2007. A summary ofthe 2002 base year emissions inventory is shown in Table B-1.

a e - : ase ear zone season Weekd E ay missions nven ., I try 0

Source Category NOx (TOQ.stDav) voc (1'ons!Bay)

Stationary Point 116.2 40.2

Area /with Nonroad 38.8 44.7

Mobile 44.7 23.0

Biogenic 0.0 99.6

Total 199.7 207.5

T bl B 1 BRNA2002B Y 0

2. Develop the 2002 RFP Base Year Inventory

EPA guidance specifies that the RFP reductions must be based on anthropogenic emissions only. For

NOx, with no biogenic emissions in the 2002 Base Year Inventory, the 2002 RFP Base Year Inventory is

the same as the 2002 Base Year Inventory. For VOC, the 2002 RFP Base Year Inventory is equal to 207.5

minus 99.6 or 107.9 tons/day (TPD).

3. Calculate the Non-Creditable Fleet Turnover Correction

EPA guidance states that emission reductions due to vehicle fleet turnover (higher polluting older vehicles

being replaced by lower polluting newer vehicles) are not creditable towards RFP. The emission

inventories are a representation of the effects of pre-1990 CAA controls projected to the RFP base and

milestone years. As such, these inventories can be used to estimate the effects of the pre-1990 CAA

controls between milestone years.

The emission rates are developed using the latest version of EPA's emISSIOn factor model,

MOBILE6.2.03. The model input file is set up to disable all 1990 CAA effects, set the model evaluation

430
year to the RFP base or milestone year, and then the model is run to determine emission factors for the

base or milestone year with only pre-1990 CAA controls. The emission factors for all years are then

multiplied by the 2002 base year vehicle miles travelled (VMT). The non-creditable fleet turnover

correction is calculated by subtracting the 2008 projected emissions from the 2002 projected emissions.

The results are summarized in Table B-2. (See Appendix - Calculation ofFMVCP/RVP Reductions)

Table B-2: FMVCP/RVP Emissions Corrections

NOx Mobile Emissions, TPD VOC Mobile Emissions, TPD

Target Year Target Year

Target Year 2002 Actual w/2002 VMT (l) 2002 Actual w/2002 VMT (1)

2002 45.3 51.0 26.5 29.0

2008 45.3 44.6 26.5 24.6

Correction 6.4 4.4

(1) Post 1990 Clean Air Act controls off

4. Develop the Adjusted RFP Base Year Inventory for 2002 Relative to 2008

The Adjusted RFP Base Year Inventory for 2002 Relative to 2008 is equal to the 2002 RFP Base Year

Inventory, as calculated in Step 2, minus the non-creditable fleet turnover correction, as calculated in Step

~",'3. For NOx, the calculation is 199.7 less 6.4 or 193.3 TPD. For VOC, the calculation is 107.9 less 4.4 or

103.5 TPD.

5. Calculate the 2008 Required 15% Emissions Reduction

The EPA 1997 Phase II 8-hour ozone implementation rule requires all ozone nonattainment areas

classified as moderate and above to reduce NOx and/or VOC emissions by 15% for the period 2002

through 2008. The required 2008 reductions are calculated by multiplying the Adjusted RFP Base Year

Inventory for 2002 Relative to 2008, as calculated in Step 4, by the percent reduction needed to meet RFP

requirements. LDEQ has decided to rely on NOx reductions to meet the RFP requirements. As such, the

required NOx reductions are equal to 193.3 times 15% or 29.0 tons/day.

6. Calculate the 2008 Target Level of Emissions

The 2008 Target Level of Emissions is calculated by subtracting the required emission reductions, as

calculated in Step 5, and the non-creditable fleet turnover correction, as calculated in Step 3, from the

2002 Base Year Inventory. For NOx, the calculation is 199.7 minus 29.0 and minus 6.4 or 164.3 tons/day.

The RFP plan must demonstrate that the projected emissions for 2008, reflecting growth and the RFP

control strategy, will be less than or equal to the 2008 Target Level of Emissions. Table B-3 summarizes

the calculation ofthe Target Level. Note: The VOC calculation is shown for information only.

Ta e bl B 3 S - : ummarv ofCaI I . cu arion 0 fTarget LeveI ror BRNA

Description NOx, TPD VOC, TPD

Step 1: 2002 Base Year Inventory 199.7 207.5

Step 2: Emissions from Biogenic Sources 0.0 99.6

Step 2a: Calculate the 2002 RFP Base Year Inventory (Step 1 minus Step 2) 199.7 107.9

Step 3: 2002 to 2008 Non-creditable Fleet Turnover Correction 6.4 4.4

Step 4: Calculate the Adjusted RFP Base Year Inventory (Step 2a minus Step 3) 193.3 103.5

431
Step 5: Percent ofNOx and VOC to meet 15% Reduction Requirement 15.0 0.0

Step Sa: Calculate the 2008 15% Reduction Requirement (Step 4 times Step 5) 29.0 0.0

Step 6: Calculate the 2008 Target Levels (Step 4 minus Step Sa) 164.3 103.5

C. 2008 RFP MILESTONE YEAR EMISSIONS PROJECTION

EPA guidance specifies the method states must use to project the 2008 milestone year emissions. The

projection is used to demonstrate compliance with RFP reduction requirements. The RFP milestone year

emissions are projected with a three-step process.

• Determine the growth from 2002 to 2008 for the various source categories

• Determine the emission reductions from controls applied between 2002 and 2008

• Project the 2008 RFP milestone year emissions

1. Determine the Growth from 2002 to 2008 for the Various Source Categories

EPA guidance requires that the growth of each source category be determined and included in the 2008

milestone year emissions projection.

Point Sources - The BRNA is classified as moderate nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard.

The CAA Section 182(b)(5) requires moderate areas to off-set growth by a minimum of 1.15 to 1.0. For

this RFP demonstration, it is assumed that the off-set requirement will result in no NOx point source

growth within the BRNA. The correctness of this assumption can be confirmed by comparing the point

source inventory from the 2002 base year with the LDEQ Emission Inventory (EI) for 2007 (2008 is not

yet available) as follows:

T bl C 1 Ca e - : omparison.efNOx Inventon' tior 2002 t0 2007

llescringon, ' ~. l~~.'l'PD

2002 Base Year NOx Point Source Inventory 116.2

NOx Control Rule Reductions 40.0 (1)

NOx Inventory After Controls 76.2

2007EINOx 71.2

(1) The NOx control rule (LAC 33:III.2201) was designed to achieve approximately 40 TPD

reductions in the BRNA.

The required off-set, plus other factors, has resulted in an estimated excess over controls decrease in point

source emissions ofapproximately 5 TPD. (See 2002 and 2007 Point Source Inventories in Appendix -

Point Sources by Facility)

Area and Nonroad Sources - EPA guidance requires that states project growth of these emission

categories with the Economic Growth Analysis System (EGAS) model. The EGAS growth factors for the

emission categories in the BRNA were determined and then multiplied times the 2002 emissions to get

the projected 2008 emissions. The growth was calculated by subtracting the 2002 emission from the 2008

estimated emission for each category. (See Appendix - Calculation of Area Source Growth,

Calculation of Nonroad Source Growth)

Mobile Sources - EPA guidance requires that states project mobile source growth with the

MOBILE6.2.03 model. Using the model and the projected 2008 VMT, the 2008 estimated emissions were

432
determined. The growth was calculated by subtracting the 2002 emissions from the 2008 estimated

emissions. (See Appendix - Calculation of Mobile Source Growth)

The following table summarizes the projected growth from 2002 to 2008 for all source types.

T bl C 2 P . t d G th b S T a e - : rorec e row )y ource ivne

Source Type NOx,TPD VOC,TPD

Point 0.0 0.0

Area 0.26 3.29

Nonroad 3.90 0.36

Mobile -15.7 -7.8

Total Growth -11.54 -4.15

2. Determine the Emission Reductions from Controls Applied Between 2002 and 2008

a. In early 2002 LDEQ promulgated a NOx control rule (LAC 33:III, Chapter 22)

that established requirements for reducing NOx emissions during the ozone season in the Baton Rouge

nonattainment area as well as four parishes to the north ofBaton Rouge. Affected facilities included those

with one or more sources that collectively emitted or had the potential to emit fifty tons per year or more

ofNOx.

The rule established emission factors for boilers, heaters, furnaces, turbines and internal

combustion engines. Further, the rule established requirements for permits, compliance demonstration,

recordkeeping and reporting. Facilities were required to have controls fully operational by May 1,2005.

.r,·'-· The rule established the following emission limits:

• Electric Power Generating System Boilers

Coal-fired 0.211b/MMBtu

Number 6 Fuel Oil-fired 0.18 Ib/MMBtu

All Others (gaseous or liquid) 0.10 Ib/MMBtu

• Industrial Boilers 0.10 Ib/MMBtu

• Process Heaters/Fumaces

Ammonia Reformers 0.23 Ib/MMBtu

All Others 0.08 Ib/MMBtu

• Stationary Gas Turbines

Peaking Service, Fuel Oil-fired 0.30 Ib/MMBtu

Peaking Service, Gas-fired 0.20 IblMMBtu

All Others 0.161bIMMBtu

• Stationary Internal Combustion Engines

Lean-bum 4 g/Hp-hour

Rich-bum 2 g/Hp-hour

Additionally, after the BRNA was reclassified to severe, LDEQ promulgated a revision to

Chapter 22 (29LRI674) that established requirements for smaller NOx sources - equal to or greater than

twenty-five tons per year and less than fifty tons per year. All other provisions ofChapter 22 remained the

same. The rule proposed the following emission limits for these smaller sources:

433
• Electric Power Generating System Boilers

Coal-fired ; 0.50 IblMMBtu

Number 6 Fuel Oil-fired 0.301blMMBtu

All Others (gaseous or liquid) 0.20 IblMMBtu

• Industrial Boilers 0.20 IblMMBtu

• Process Heaters/Furnaces

Ammonia Reformers 0.30 IblMMBtu

All Others 0.18IbIMMBtu

• Stationaty Gas Turbines

Peaking Service, Fuel Oil-fired 0.371blMMBtu

Peaking Service, Gas-fired 0.27 IblMMBtu

All Others 0.24 IblMMBtu

• Stationaty Internal Combustion Engines

Lean-burn 10 g/Hp-hour

Rich-burn 2 g/Hp-hour

The Chapter 22 NOx rule was designed to achieve approximately 40 TPD ofreductions in BRNA only.

b. Other regulations and programs that reduced NOx (and VOC) emissions after

2002 include:

(1) Mobile Source Controls - Mobile source controls that reduced NOx and

VOC emissions included a vehicle inspection and maintenance (lIM) program and federal motor vehicle

control programs (FMVCP). All mobile source control programs were modeled with EPA's current

version of the onroad emissions model, MOBILE6. Below is a brief summary of these mobile source

control programs.

(a) Vehicle 11M Program - LDEQ promulgated a revision to the

low enhanced vehicle 11M program for the BRNA. LDEQ received full approval from EPA for its low

enhanced JIM program (Final Rule, 67 FR 60594). The program included gas cap testing and visual antitampering checks on 1980 and newer gasoline-fueled cars and trucks weighing less than 10,000 Ibs (gross

vehicle weight rating). On-board diagnostic (OBD) testing is conducted on 1996 and newer vehicles.

Annual emission testing is conducted using a decentralized network of certified motor vehicle inspection

stations.

(b) Tier 2/Low Sulfur Gasoline Program Credits - The final rule

on Tier 2 motor vehicle emissions standards and sulfur control requirements for passenger cars, light

trucks, and medium-duty cars including SUVs and minivans rated between 8,500 and 10,000 pounds, was

published on February 10,2000 (65 FR 6698). As with the NLEV program, MOBILE6 is configured for

estimation of credits derived from the Tier 2 program beginning with calendar year 2004 and later.

(2) Nonroad Source Controls - Nonroad source controls that reduced NOx

and VOC emissions in the BRNA included four federal off-road measures. These measures regulated

diesel engines, recreational and commercial marine vessels, and locomotives. Following is a summary of

these federal measures:

434
(a) Nonroad Diesel Engines - The final rule on control of emissions

from nonroad diesel engines was published on October 23, 1998 (63 FR 205). The rule was established to

reduce emissions from nonroad diesel engines and equipment by establishing stringent new emissions

standards and requirements to ensure that engines maintain their level of emission performance as they

age, to provide compliance flexibility to engine and equipment manufacturers, and to establish a

voluntary program to encourage the introduction oflow-emitting engines.

(b) Marine Spark-Ignition Engines - The fmal rule for control of

emissions from new, gasoline, spark-ignition marine engines was published on October 4, 1996 (61 FR

194). The rule established, beginning in 1998, more stringent standards for manufacture of engines used

in outboards, personal watercraft, and jet boats.

(c) Marine Compression-Ignition Engines - The final rule for

control of emissions from new, compression-ignition, marine diesel engines, equal to or greater than 37

kilowatts, was published on December 29, 1999 (64 FR 249). The rule sets emission standards for engines

and takes effect between 2004 and 2007, depending on engine size.

(d) Locomotives and Locomotive Engines - The final rule for

control of emissions from locomotives and locomotive engines was published on April 16, 1998 (63 FR

73). The rule sets emission standards for engines and includes a variety of compliance and enforcement

provisions and regulations concerning the preemption of certain state and local controls for locomotives.

,," 3. Project the 2008 RFP Milestone Year Emissions

The 2008 milestone year for BRNA projections are summarized in Table C-3. Each category includes

both growth from 2002 to 2008 and controls.

Table C-3'.2008 RFP Milestone Year Emissions

Source Cateeorv NOx. TPD VOC.TPD

Point Source (l) 71.2 34.2

AreaJwNonroad Source (Tables B-1 plus C-2) 43.0 48.4

Mobile Source (Tables B-1 plus C-2) 29.0 15.2

Total Prolected Emissions 143.2 97.8

(l) From 2007 EI, no growth to 2008

D.. Demonstration of Compliance with RFP Requirements

The EPA Phase II 1997 Eight-Hour Ozone Implementation Rule requires all ozone nonattainment areas

classified as moderate to reduce NOx and/or VOC emissions by 15% for the period 2002 through 2008. In

addition to the 15%, the required reductions must also offset growth and vehicle fleet turnover. To

demonstrate compliance with these requirements, the states are to compare the calculated 2008 Target

Level of Emissions to the 2008 Projected Milestone Year Emissions after controls are applied. If the

Projected Milestone Year Emissions are less than the Target Level of Emissions, the requirements are

satisfied.

BRNA chose to demonstrate compliance with RFP requirements with NOx reductions. Table D-I shows

that the requirements are met.

Table D-l: RFP Demonstration for 2008

Description NOx, TPD VOCTPD

Target Level of Emissions for 2008 (Table B-3) 164.3 103.5

435
Projected 2008 RFP Milestone Year Emissions (fable C-3) 143.2 97.8

Are Milestone Year Emissions less than Target Level of Emissions? Yes Yes

Excess 21.1 5.7

E. Contingency Plan

In case of a milestone year attainment failure, the states are required to have a contingency plan that

reduces emissions by an additional 3% between the 2008 RFP milestone year and the next calendar year.

EPA guidance allows that controlled emission reductions not previously used in the 2008 RFP milestone

demonstration may be used to satisfy contingency requirements. Because the excess emission reductions

from the 2008 RFP demonstration are greater than the reductions required for 2009 contingency, the 2009

contingency plan for BRNA does not require any additional controls. A summary ofthe estimated control

.reductions and the required contingency level ofreductions is presented in Table E-l.

T bl a e E 1- : RFPCentmzencv Demonstration

Description I NO., t'PD VOC,TPD

Adiusted 2008 Base Year (Section BA) 193.3 103.5

Required % Contingency 3% NA

Required Contingency Reductions in 2009 5.8 NA

Excess from 2008 RFf Demonstration (Table D-l) 21.1 5.7

Is excess greater than required contingency reductions? Yes Yes

Centinaency Excess 15.3 5.7

436
Appendix· Calculation of FMVCP/RVP Reductions

Ozone Season Weekday Emissions, 2002 • 2008

NOxMobile Emissions, fPo \/QC 1\fIobfIe·EtnlssIon$~fPO . ,

2002 2002 2008 FMVCP 2002 2002 2008 . i=MVCP

Parish ActlJal (1) Adjusted (2) w/2002· VMTJ~) ~eduction (4) Actual (1) AdjlJ~tfJcI (~l w/2QQ2YIl/IT (31 Reducti91) (4)

Ascension 7.5 8.4 7.3 1.1 3.8 4.2 3.6 0.6

E Baton Rouge 18.9 21.5 19.1 2.4 13.9 15.2 12.9 2.3

Iberville 4.5 5.1 4.3 0.8 2.0 2.2 1.8 0.4

Livingston 8.9 9.9 8.6 1.3 4.4 4.8 4.1 0.7

W Baton Rouge 5.5 6.1 5.3 0.8 2.4 2.6 2.2 0.4

Totals 45.3 51.0 44.6 6.4 26.5 29.0 24.6 4.4

Notes:

(1) Peak Ozone Season, RVP 7.8,2002 VMT, 2002 Emission Factors

(2) Peak Ozone Season, RVP 7.8, 2002 VMT, 2002 Emission Factors, CM Disabled

(3) Peak Ozone Season, RVP 7.8, 2002 VMT, 2008 Emission Factors, CM Disabled

(4) =(2) - (3)

Factors projected from MOBILE6.2.03.

The adjustments are due to FMVCP only since the RVP is constant from 2002 to 2008.

437
Appendix - Point Sources by Facility

2002 TPYI 2007 TPYI

Parish AI# Facility , voe HOx voe NOx

0180 529 UNIVAR USA INC/GEISMAR 2.0 0.0 3.0 0.9

0180 1093 CROMPTONINC/MONOCHEM 10.0 392.0 5.6 158.7

0180 1136 SHELL CHEMICAL LP/GEISMAR PLNT 510.0 739.0 537.8 684.8

0180 1138 GEISMAR VINYLS CO LP 115.0 130.0 110.2 42.8

0180 1433 CROMPTON MFG COINC/GEISMAR PLANT 801.0 100.0 626.2 13.0

0180 1468 RUBICON INC. 236.0 590.0 178.9 422.5

0180 2049 BASF CORPORATION/GEISMAR SITE 268.0 671.0 255.3 822.9

0180 2082 HONEYWELL INTL INC/GEISMAR WRKS 24.0 49.0 56.0 79.5

0180 2218 PRAXAIR INC/GEISMAR 19.0 199.0 33.5 216.3

0180 2245 TRIADNITROGEN LLC 66.0 2368.0 0.6 6.2

0180 2398 TRIADNITROGEN LLC/MELAMINE CHEMICALS 6.0 2.0 0.0 0.0

0180 2416 CFINDUSTRIES INC./DONALDSONVILLE NITROGEN 228.0 3429.0 199.4 2894.5

0180 2679 AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS INc/GEISMAR SYNGAS 3.0 56.0 4.2 62.2

0180 3302 ELPASO FLO SRVCS CO/RIVERSIDE 94.0 288.0 91.8 171.3

0180 3400 VULCAN CHEMICALS 262.0 1286.0 41.7 212.6

0180 3420 ORMET CORP/ALUMINA PLANT 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0

0180 3732 PCS NITROGEN FERTIUZER,L.P./GEISMAR SO.O 1329.0 19.2 430.5

0180 3990 WAGNER OIL COCO/DARROW COMM LEASE 36.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0180 4762 ENTERPRISE GAS PROC LLCITEBONE FRAC PLNT 107.0 49.0 174.5 39.2

0180 4803 BFI WASTE SYSTEMS OFN.A.INc/COLONIAL LANDFILL 12.0 11.0 8;5 9.9

0180 5565 WILLIAMS OLEFINS LLC/GEISMAR ETHYLENE 278.0 703.0 246,3 640.4

0180 8142 WAGNER OIL CO/DARROW GRC BATTERY 70.0 41.0 11.4 5.0

0180 11416 BRIDGELINE HOLDINGS LP/SORRENTO UNDERGROUND GAS SF 11.0 44.0 17.1 30.2

0180 17771 T T BARGE CLEANING INC/MILE 183 7.1 1.8 11.8 1.0

0180 20S06 ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS CO/SORRENTO PHT 29.0 3.0 27.7 2.8

0180 26272 051 TRANSPORTS INC 13.0 1.0 29.8 0.9

0180 27834 EXXONMOBIL PIPELINE CO/SORRENTO STORAGE 37.0 2.0 37.3 1.2

0180 30073 AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS INc/DINITROTOLUENE 5.0 25.0 5.1 29.

0180 31513 AIR LIOUIDE AMERICA CORP/GEISMAR 3.0 269.0 20.2 106.2 .

0180 31514 GABRIEL CHEMICALS LLC/CHLOROSULFONIC ACID PLANT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0180 33564 CooperT SmithStevedoring Co - America Weigh Rig Loading & TransferFacility na na 0.8 29.2

0180 33579 CoooerT SmithStevedorina Co - FloatinaGrain ElevatorRia #1 na na 0.0 0.0

0180 39945 ORMET CORP/BURNSIDE BULK MARINE TERMINAL 7.0 89.0 0.8 9.0

0180 41417 SHELL PIPELINE COLP/SORRENTODOME STORAGE 6.0 2.0 188.0 1.6

0180 46968 Mid-America Resources·Coro- Sorrento~Field Production liaci!itY·, na na, 2A 0.2

0180 67572 DUPONT CHEMICALS/BURNSIDE PLANT 2.0 55.0 2,0 55.1

0180 83718 GULF LIOUIDS NEW RIVER PROJECT LLC/GEISMAR GAS PLNT 24.8 44.0 31.7 54.5

0180 86181 TEXACO PIPELINES LLC/SORRENTO TENDS PUMP STN 15.0 0.0 12.8 0.0

0180 88164 ENTERPRISE PROD OPER LP/SORRENTO RAILRACK 1.0 0.0 5.9 0.2

0180 90203 EOTT ENERGY OPER LP/DARROW CRUDE OIL TERM 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0180 92534 BORDEN CHEM INC/FORMALDEHYDE TRAINS & METHANOL TANK FARM 41.0 3.0 56.1 0.8

0180 97675 CHEMTECH CHEMICALS/CHEMICAL BLENDING 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0

0180 99129 BURLINGTON RESOURCES O&G/UNITED LANDS #1 4.0 1.0 3.8 0.5

0180 100581 WILLIAMS OLEFINS LLC/HC BARGE LOAD 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0180 100651 GULF LIOUIDS NEW RIVER PROJECT/SORRENTO GAS PLANT 5.5 0.2 12.1 1.7

0180 122402 IMTT ' Geismar na na 0.0 0.0

0180 143528 State Lease 17446 Tank Batterv - Darrow Field na na 7.9 0.0

0180 143529 SL17446 Well- DarrowField na na 2.4 0.3

0180 145270 SorrentoProduction FacilitY na na 3.5 0.1

0840 248 DELTECH CORPORATION 28.0 256.0 38.5 90.8

0840 285 EXXONMOBIL CHEM/BR PLASTICS PLNT 532.0 108.0 199.2 117.2

0840 286 EXXONMOBIL CHEM CO/BR CHEM PLT 1708.0 2486;0 1510.2 2166.6

0840 288 FORMOSA PLASTICS CORPORATION LA 44.0 570.0 80.7 253.0

0840 289 HONEYWELL/BATON ROUGE PLNT 242.0 21.0 269.1 16.4

0840 332 EXXONMOBIUB R MARKETING TERM 36.0 0.0 32.4 0.0

0840 582 PLANTATION PIPELINE CO/BR TANK FARM 1787.0 0.0 634.5 0.0

0840 669 ALBEMARLE CORP. 31.0 11.0 27.0 9.6

0840 1000 ASHLAND CHEM CO/B.R. DISTRIBUTION 6.9 0.0 5.8 0.0

0840 1157 STUPP CORP/BAKER 5.0 0.0 8.0 0.0

0840 1186 ENTERGY GSIILA STN 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0840 1186 ENTERGY/LA STATION 1 51.0 1833.0 52.0 1676.0

0840 1314 RHODIA INC/BR FAC 66.0 74.0 30.5 69.9

0840 1395 DSM COPOLYMERlBR PLANT 78.0 127.0 76.9 197.2

0840 1396 EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES/B R SMELTER 0.0 9.0 1.1 15.7

0840 1413 UOP LLC/BR PLNT 2.0 46.0 2.8 35.0

0840 1516 CLEAN HARBORS BATON ROUGE LLC 7.0 0.0 0.5 0.0

0840 2617 GEORGIA PACIFIC/PT HUDSON OPERATNS 334.0 1916.0 629.1 1681.6

438
Appendix - Point Sources by Facility

2002 TPYI 2007 TPY)

Parish Al# Facilitv voe HOx voe HOx

0180 529 UNIVAR USA INC/GEISMAR 2.0 0.0 3.0 0.9

0840 2638 EXXONMOBIL REF & SUPPLY CO/BR REFINERY 1659.0 3583.0 1545.0 2018.5

0840 3085 ETHYL CORPORATION 1.2 0.0 4.9 0.0

0840 3230 EXXONMOBIL CHEM CO/RESIN FINSHNG PLT 14.0 16.0 22.1 14.8

0840 3387 FERRO CORPORATION/BATON ROUGE SITE 18.0 8.0 13.4 8.5

0840 3519 EXXONMOBILCHEM CO/B.R. POLYOLEFINS 101.0 105.0 82.5 111.3

0840 3587 PPG IND INC/GROW AUTOMOTIVE 3.0 0.0 1.7 0.0

0840 4407 EBR Parish Renewable EnergvCenter na na 1.7 0.0

0840 4993 BPAMERICA PROD/PT HUDSON GAS PlNT 52.0 20.0 3.5 0.7

0840 5190 ALLWASTE CONTAINER SVCS/BATON ROUGE PLANT 0.0 2.0 1.0 2.0

0840 5540 LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY 6.4 133.4 6.4 124.5

0840 8007 FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION CO/ZACHARY COMP STN 73.0 940.0 71.7 363.9

0840 11595FLOWERS BAKING COOFBATON ROUGE LLC 41.4 1.5 51.2 1.8

0840 17129 HILCORP ENERGY CO/COMITE FIELD FACILITY 9.0 9.0 25.0 7.0

0840 22750 EDO SPECIALTY PLASTICS 13.0 0.0 16.8 0.0

0840 25383 LAMAR CORP/ LAMAR GRAPHICS 20.0 0.0 38.4 0.0

0840 27559 BAYOU COATING LLC 2.0 2.0 27.2 6.2

0840 29884 GREAT LAKES CARBON CORP/B R CALONED COKE PLT 8.5 380.0 5.5 361.9

0840 31128 EastBaton Rouge Parish Landfill(BFI North) na na 4.2 5.5

0840 32045VINTAGE PETROLEUM INC/MANCHAC POINT 85.0 19.0 16.0 22.0

0840 32050 SCHERING-PLOUGH ANIMAL HEALTH CORPNET OPERATIONS 2.1 0.7 0.0 0.0

0840 32056 EXXON MOBIL CORP/EMPR 7.0 4.0 5.0 1.3

0840 88139 BPAMERICA PROD/PT HUDSON CTB 30.0 14.0 21.4 12.2

0840 90176 B P PIPEUNES NORTH AMERICA/PT HUDSON TERMINAL 40.7 0.0 0.0 0.0

0840 95859 UniversItY Reid Production Facilltv na na 28.2 9.6

0840 96336 USComposite Pipe South LLC - Baton RougePlant na na 5.5 4.6

0840 98136 HILCORP ENERGY CO/COBB #1 COMITE FIELD 1.0 35.0 0.0 0.0

0840 114658Sieaen Production Facllitv• Sleaen Field na na 32.0 9.5

0840 114659Port Hudson Field Production FacilItY na na 34.2 0.2

0840 119007DuolantlerTank Batterv - UniversItY Field na na 10.0 24.0

0840 ., 119008 Nelson Tank Battery - UniversityField na na 24.0 18.0

0840 138716North BurtvilieField Fadlitv - North Burtvlile Field na na 16.9 8.4

0840",,- 144826Crown Paper#1 Production FacilItY - ProfitIsland Field na na 14.8 7.5

0840 146877Crown Paoer#1 Treating FacilItY - Profit Island Reid na na 5.2 13.5

1280 1306 CORA TEXAS MFG INc/SUGAR MILL 14.0 215.0 14.0 . 221.0

1280 1409 DOW CHEMICAL CO/LA OPERATIONS 1270.0 8611.0 1404.4.• 4582.7

1280 1607 ATOFINA PETROCHEMICALS INc/COSMAR STYRENE PlNT 98.0 682.0 121.7- 373.7

1280 2043 WILLIAMS FIELD SERVICES/CHOCTAW TERMINAL 18.0 12.0 18.2'r;.- 10.6

1280 2367 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION INC/ST.GABRIEL PLANT 257.0 215.0 215.1" 231.9

1280 2455 GEORGIA GULF CHEM & VINYLS LLC/PLAQUEMINE 139.0 1265.0 170.4 1181.4

1280 2625 ENTERGY GSIIWILLOW GLEN 103.0 2437.0 10.0 208.0

1280 2644 PIONEER AMERICAS INC 0.3 16.7 1.6 26.0

1280 3129 ASHLAND CHEMICAL CO/PLAOUEMINE METHANOL PlNT 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0

1280 3263 AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS INC/ST.GABRIEL 12.0 64.0 37.6 73.6

1280 3492 LBC BATON ROUGE LLC/SUNSHINE TERM 58.0 1.0 104.1 3.3

1280 4197 SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS/WHITE CASTLE CS 20.0 404.0 65.5 174.8

1280 5176 ATOFINA PETROCHEM INC/CARVILLE POLYSTYRENE 4.0 33.0 17.6 22.1

1280 7359 TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION LPIWHITE CASTLE CS 3.0 180.0 1.7 0.0

1280 8055 State of loUisianaMilitary - GillisW Long Center na na 0.9 14.1

1280 8056 Plaquemine PointShipyard na na 16.2 6.0

1280 8072 GRUY PETROLEUM MGMT CO/BAYOU BOUILLON PF 15.0 60.0 0.0 0.0

1280 14139 PLAINS MARKETING LP/ST GABRIEL TERMINAL 12.0 0.0 12.1 0.0

1280 14535INEOS FLUOR AMERICAS LLC/KLEA·134A PLANT 1.9 15.6 2.5 14.9

1280 17383 LAINTRASTATE GAS CO./MYRTlE GROVE C.S. 10.0 19.0 24.8 11.6

1280 19184 UG UQUIDSCOLLC/PLAQUEMINE GAS 5.0 151.0 46.6 117.3

1280 20411TEXAS PETRO INVESTMENT CO/BAYOU BLEU FLD PROD 69.0 113.0 19.9 60.4

1280 24479 SCS Iberville Coatings Inc na na 2.3 1.5

1280 26034 LAENERGY & POWER AUTHORITY/PLAQUEMINE STEAM & DIESEL PWR PLT 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.3

1280 26984 CIBA SPECIALTY/ST. GABRIEL PLANT 5.0 4.0 3.0 1.5

1280 27495 BIOPRODUCTS OF LALLc/GULF COAST 15.4 1.7 0.1 0.1

1280 32133 G& A INTERNATIONAl/BAYOU SORREL 23.0 43.0 22.8 19.5

1280 32135 JPOIL CO/WHITE CASTLE FLD 37.0 37.0 39.1 23.3

1280 32141 BRIDGEUNE HOLDINGS LPITALLY HO CS 1.0 1.0 0.2 0.2

1280 32145 HILCORP ENERGY CO/NW BAYOU CHOCTAW 47.0 16.0 3.6 2.9

1280 32146 BUGH PETROLEUM INC/BAYOU CHOCTAW FLD PROD FAC 8.4 32.8 0.0 0.0

1280 32154 JPOIL CO/GRAND RIVER 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

1280 32160 Bavou BleuFieldProduction Facilltv na na 9.8 25.7

1280 32161 OLEUM OPERATING CO LC/BYU HENRY FLD PF 8.3 14.6 8.2 14.5

1280 33667 Basic IndustriesInc - Sandblast & SprayPaint Yard na na 9.9 7.0

1280 39633 Command services Inc na na 38.6 23.4

439
Appendix - Point Sources by Facility

2002 TPYI 2007 TPYI

Parish AI# Fac;lIitv vOt NO,x VOC Nox

0180 529 UNIVAR USA INC/GEISMAR 2.0 0.0 3.0 0.9

1280 39978 KINDER MORGAN L10UIDS TERMINAL LLC/ST GABRIEL TERMINAL 18.3 0.0 12.7 0.5

1280 40037 NOBLE ENERGY INC/STATE LEASE 14371 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.5

1280 51854 CARVILLE ENERGY LLC/CARVILLE ENERGY CENTER 2.0 18.0 1.2 347.2

1280 843n OLEUM OPERATING CO LC/BAYOU DES GLAISE5-WILBERT MINERAL B LEASE 7.4 30.0 0.0 0.0

1280 84483 HILCORP ENERGY CO/FROG LAKE 14.0 29.0 0.0 0.0

1280 85393 PETRO HUNT LLC/BYU HENRY CTL FAC 36.0 48.0 14.0 0.0

1280 85652 AEP CORPNENTURES LEASE CO/PLAQUEMINE COGEN 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

1280 86585 SHELL PIPELINE COLP/GRAND RIVER BARGE LOADING 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

1280 89237 INEOS LLCIINEOS OXIDE 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

1280 89512 E&E PRODUCTION COIDUGAS So. LEBLANC LTDETAL #1 3.0 0.0 20.6 5.0

1280 90197 EOTT ENERGY PIPELINE LP/BAYOU BLUE CRUDE OIL TERM 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

1280 101588 PETROQUEST ENERGY LLC/EEX CORP PF#1 20.0 11.0 30.2 10.9

1280 113166 BayOU Bouillon Production FacilItY na na 11.7 11.9

1280 118389 BayOU B1eu • Central FadlltY#1 na na 10.1 7.3

1280 119219WhiteCastle DeepProduction Facllltv na na 32.1 3.7

1280 128487 Dent et al #1 Production Facilitv- Musson Reid na na 16.3 0.8

1280 126578 Shinteeh Louisiana LLC - Plaouemine PVC Plant na na 0.0 0.0

1280 126748 SChwing 10 Production Facility- Frog LakeField na na 14.2 2.7

1280 126750 DowChemical CoProduction Fadlltv - Frog LakeReid na na 8.3 7.8

1280 128638 ForestHomePartnership Facilitv na na 15.5 22.8

1280 134264GuevmardProduction Fadlitv - St Gabriel Reid na na 16.3 17.4

1280 138856 St Gabriel DehvSo. NGL Production Facilitv na na 15.9 0.2

1280 139760 BayOU Bouillion etal #1 Production Facilltv na na 0.0 0.0

1740 1467 EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS 3.0 14.0 2.1 4.9

1740 4990 BPAMERICA PROD/LOCKHART CROSSING CF# 1 12.0 38.0 10.6 12.9

1740 6858 GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES INC 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.6

1740 9154 THESHAW GROUP/SUNLAND FABRICATORS 14.0 0:0 67.7 15.5

1740 11767 WASTE MANAGEMENT OFLA LLC/WOODSIDE LANDFILL 37.0 12;0 4.0 8.9

1740 17042 DENBURY RESOURCES INC/LOCKHART CROSS WILCOX CF3 121.0 125.0 24.9 10.2

1740 19875 WEYERHAEUSER CO/HOLDEN SAWMILL So. LOG PROCESS 219.0 22;0 223.9 19.4 .-

1740 26884 PLAINS MARKETING LP/LOCKHART CROSSING 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

1740 32465 TMREXPLORATION INC/ LVG WXI RASULB 19.6 0.2 25.0 1.1

1740 32466 ErvaS Mayers # 1 na na 0.0 0.0

1740 80537 DELTA ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCTS INC 20.8 0.0 19.8 1.5 - 1740 99952 O'M Barnett#2 Fadlitv - LockhartCrossina Field na na 0.8 0.0

1740 120886 SL7729#2Wellsite - LockhartCrossino Field na na 1.9 0.0

1740 130526BlindRiverFedlltvCSL 18562 #1 Well) - Blind RiverFleld'Block-16 '--" - o -na 0_ na _. o 0

0.0 0.0

1740 146741lockhart Crossing Central Processing Faciltv -na- na 0.0 0.0

3120 302 T.T. BARGE SERVICE MILE237 LLC/BR SHIPYARD 34.8 7.8 12.6 3.3

3120 858 EXXONMOBIL REF So. SUPPLY COlANCHORAGE TNKFRM 32.0 0,0 25.2 2.5

3120 1648 CASTROL CONSUMER N AMER AUTO INCIPT ALLEN 16;5 3.3 17.4 7.6

3120 2366 PLAOD REFINING COLLC/PT ALLEN 204.0 967.0 240.7 743.9

3120 2519 DSM COPOLYMER/ADDIS PLANT 493,0 163;0 0.0 0.0

3120 2937 Shaw55&.5 Fabricators Inc 0 AddisFacilitv na na 5.3 9.5

3120 3473 SHINTECH LOUISIANA LLC/ADDIS PLANT B 1.0 5.0 0.0 0.0

3120 4056 HARRY L. LAWS So. COINC/ONCLARE CENTRAL FACTORY 10.0 121:0 0.0 0.0

3120 4174 SID RICHARDSON CARBON CO/ADDIS PLT 307.0 220.0 99.0 326.9

3120 9495 DISCOVERY ALUMINAS INC/ALCOA PORT ALLEN WORKS 35.0 30.0 52.5 30.6

3120 11059SoedaltvApplication Services Inc - Port AllenFacilltv na na 7.6 4.8

3120 12096 Westwav TerminalCoInc na na 0.1 0.3

3120 17161 EXXONMOBIL PROD CO/BR GAS PLANT 26.0 114.0 17.9 63.8

3120 19338 PETROLEUM FUR So. TERM/PORT ALLEN 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0

3120 19556 INTERCONTINENTAL TERMINALS CO/ANCHORAGE CHEM TERM 1.8 0.3 0.0 0.0

3120 25344 Criterion CatalYsts So. Technolooies LP- HPA Port Allen Plant na na 8.1 7.7

3120 26217 INTLPAINTING CORP 35.0 0.0 29.8 0.0

3120 40198 B R FRACTIONATORS/PLT 1 21.0 42.0 18.8 60.7

3120 43634TRINITYMARINE PRODUCTS INC/PLANT 48 14.0 4.0 9.5 0.2

3120 83425 SHINTECH LOUISIANA LLC/ADDISPLANT A 31.0 34.0 42.5 32.2

3120 98796 EXXONMOBIL PIPELINE CO/ANCHORAGE TERMINAL 8.0 0.0 11.2 0.1

3120 126510Bueche HeirsWell #1 Fadlltv SN228905- Profit Island Oil Field na na 10.8 8.1

3120 139063Oliver#1 Tank Battery - Profit Island Field na na 21.5 7.9

Column Total 14860.0 42415.0 12492.8 26000.4

1. 2002 emissions from"2002Base Year EmissionsInventoryfor the Baton RougeNonatlainrnent Area" dated June 2007

2. 2007 emissions from LDEQERICdatabase.

440
Appendix. Calculation of Area Source Growth

-.

AREA SOURCE· OZONE SEASON WEEKDAY EMISSIONS

jij~dG~:. Growth Factor 08 Estimated Emissions Growth

see Description NOx (TPP) '()C (TPD) 02·08 NOx (TPD) voe (TPD) NOx (TPD) voe(TPD\

2103006000 Commerciaillnstitution - Natural Gas 0.21 0.01 1.0971 0.23 0.01 0.02 0.00

2104006000 Residential - Natural Gas 0.79 0.05 1.0507 0.83 0.05 0.04 0.00

2104007000 Residential - LPG 0.06 0.00 1.0260 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00

2104008000 Residential-Wood Fireplaces 0.04 1.24 1.0012 0.04 1.24 0.00 0.00

2104008010 Residential-Woodstoves - General 0.03 0.56 1.0012 0.03 0.56 0.00 0.00

2104008050 Residential-Woodstoves - Non-Catalytic 0.01 1.0012 0.01 0.00

2302002100 Commercial Cooklnq - Conveyorized Charbrolllnq 0.01 1.1251 0.01 0.00

2302002200 Commercial Cooking - Underfired Charbroiling 0.04 1.1251 0.05 0.01

2302003000 Commercial Cooklnq - Deep Fat Frying 0.01 1.1251 0.01 0.00

2302003100 Commercial Cooking - Flat Griddle Frying 0.01 1.1251 0.01 0.00

2401001000 Surface Coatings - Architectural Coatings 2.77 1.0880 3.01 0.24

2401005000 Surface Coatings - Auto Refinishing: SIC 7532 0.83 1.1390 0.95 0.12

2401008000 Surface Coatings - Traffic Markers 0.15 1.0448 0.16 0.01

2401015000 Surface Coatings - Factory Finished Wood 0.02 1.2328 0.02 0.00

2401025000 Surface Coatings - Metal Furniture: SIC 25 0.02 1.4386 0.03 0.01

2401040000 Surface Coatings - Metal Cans: SIC 341 0.03 1.2763 0.04 0.01

2401050000 Surface Coatings - Miscellaneous Finished Metals 4.50 1.2763 5.74 1.24

2401055000 Surface Coatings - Machinery and Equipment 0.06 1.4077 0.08 0.02

2401065000 Surface Coatings - Electronic and Other: SIC 36-363 0.04 1.3941 0.06 0.02

2401070000 Surface Coatings - Motor Vehicles: SIC 371 0.04 1.3117 0.05 0.01

2401080000 Surface Coatings - Marine: SIC 373 1.30 1.2909 1.68 0.38

2401090000 Surface Coatings - Miscellaneous Manufacturing 0.18 1.2407 0.22 0.04

2401100000 Surface Coatings - Industrial Maintenance Coatings 0.24 1.2328 0.30 0.06

2401200000 Surface Coatlnqs - Other Special Purpose Coatinqs 0.23 1.0285 0.24 0.01

2415000000 Degreasing - All Processes, All Industries 1.14 1.2764 1.46 0.32

2420000000 Dry Cleaning - All Processes 0.88 1.1177 0.98 0.10

2425000000 Graphic Arts - All Processes 0.42 1.0754 0.45 0.03

2460100000 Consumer and Commercial Products - Personal Care 1.81 1.0094 1.83 0.02

2426020000 Consumer and Commercial Products - Household 0.62 1.0094 0.63 0.01

2460400000 Consumer and Commercial Products - Automotive 1.10 1.0094 1.11 0.01

2460500000 Consumer and Commercial Products - All Coatings 0.84 1.0094 0.85 0.01

2460600000 Consumer and Commercial Products - All Adhesives 0.46 1.0094 0.46 0.00

2460800000 Consumer and Commercial Products - FIFRA Related 1.50 1.0094 1.51 0.01

2460900000 Consumer and Commercial Products - Miscellaneous i.~:".i i id I 0.06 1.0094 0.06 0.00

2461021000 Commercial - Cutback Asphalt 0.43 1.2986 0.56 0.13

2461850000 Commercial- Pesticide Application 0.01 1.0494 0.01 0.00

1 \ l 441,
Appendix- Calculation of Area Source Growth

AREA SOURCE - OZO~E SEASON WEEKDAY EMISSIONS . -.... -...,. .•..;., ...-.,,""'" ",_. I Hi: ~'P l;ellJijioliii!EinJSoIoillt';(l.........

SO n!,qriPtiQrt ... ". lllli..l'!l!Ivwd';'liE· ,:. NOJ( lTI'D)" .1/!lC f!l'!!lNOx (TPDj voc m'Dl ••.Q"", . ",

2501060050 Gas Service Stations - Staae 1:Total 0.19 1.0448 0.20 0.Q1

2501060052 Gas Service Stations - Staae 1:Splash Fillina 0.45 1.0448 0.47 0.02

2501060053 Gas Service Stations - Stage 1:Submerged Filling 0.02 1.0448 0.02 0.00

2501060201 Gas Service Stations - UST: Breathing and Emptying 0.96 1.0448 1.00 0.04

2501080050 Airports Aviation Fuel - Staae 1:Total 0.19 1.3117 0.25 0.06

2501080100 Airports Aviation Fuel - Stage 2:Total 0.01 1.3117 0.01 0.00

2505000120 Petroleum Transport - All Transport Types 0.03 1.0448 0.03 0.00

2505030120 Petroleum Transport - Trucks 0.13 1.Q448 0.14 0.01

2601000000 Onsite Incineration - All Categories 0.24 0.24 1.0094 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.00

2601020000 Onsite Incineration - Comrnercialdnsfitutional 0.42 0.42 1.2986 0.55 0.55 0.13 0.13

2610000100 Open Buming - Yard Waste: Leaves 0.03 1.0094 0.03 0.00

2610000400 Open Burning - Yard Waste: Brush 0.02 1.0094 0.02 0.00

2610000500 Open Burnlna - Land Clearina: Debris 0.51 1.17 1.Q094 0.51 1.18 0.00 0.01

2610030000 Open Burning - Residential 0.14 O.lO 1.0094 0.14 0.71 0.00 0.01

2620030000 Landfill - Municipal 0.01 0.06 1.2796 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.02

2630020000 Wastewater Treatment - Publicly Owned - 0.40 1.0717 0.43 0.03

28015Q0170 Agricultural Buming - Whoie Field on Fire:Grass 0.00 0.01 1.0494 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00

2801500250 Agricultural Buming - WhQle Field on Fire:Sugarcane 1.23 2.45 1.0494 1.29 2.57 0.06 0.12

2801500261 Aaricultural Bumina-Wbole Field on Fire:Wheat Headfire 0.03 0.05 1.0494 0.03 0.05 0.00 0.00

2801500262 Agricultural Buming:-WhoJe Field on Fire:Wheat Backfire 0.01 0.02 1.04~4 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00

2810001000 Other Combustion - Forest Wildfires 0.17 0.38 1.0094 0.17 0.38 0.00 0.00

2810015000 Other Combustion-I?rescribed Burning:Forest Management 0.03 0.37 1.0094 0.03 0.37 0.00 0.00

28100~000O Other Combustion - Structure Fires 0.00 0.02 1.1809 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00

Column Total 3.92 29.94 4.18 33.23 0.26 3.29

1. 2002 Emissions from "2002 Base Year Emissions Inventory for the Baton Rouge Nonattainment Area" dated June 2007

2. Growth factors from EGAS 5.0 '

3. SCC Classifications with no estimated emissions are blank.

442
Appendix· Calculation of Nonroad Source Growth

NONROAD SOURCE· OZONE SEASON WEEKDAY EMISSIONS

2002 Growth Factor na Estimated Emissiom Growth

SCC Description NOx (TPD) VOC (TPD) 02·08 NOx (TPD) VOC (TPD) NOx (TPD) VOC(TPD

2260000000 Gasoline except Rail and Marine· 2 Stroke

2260001010 Recreational Equipment - Motorcycles:Offroad 0.00 0.72 1.0143 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.01

2260001030 Recreational Equipment - All Terrain Vehicles 0.00 0.71 1.0143 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.01

2260002000 Construction & Mining, Total 0.00 0.30 1.0143 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00

2260004000 Lawn & Garden, All 0.00 1.49 1.0143 0.00 1.51 0.00 0.02

2260006000 Commercial Equipment 0.00 0.13 1.0143 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00

2260007005 Logging Equipment- Chain Saws, >6HP 0.00 0.06 1.0143 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00

2265000000 Gasoline except Rail and Marine· 4 Stroke.

2265001010 Recreational Eguipment • Motorcycles:Off-Road 0.00 0.02 1.0143 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00

2265001030 Recreational Eguipment - All Terrain Vehicles 0.02 0.18 1.0143 0.02 0.18 0.00 0.00

2265001050 Recreational Eguipment - Golf Carts 0.00 0.01 1.0143 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00

2265002000 Construction & Mining, Total 0.02 0.16 1.0143 0.02 0.16 0.00 0.00

2265003000 Industrial Equipment, All 0.08 0.06 1.0143 0.08 0.06 0.00 0.00

2265004000 Lawn & Garden, All 0.24 1.29 1.0143 0.24 1.31 0.00 0.02

2265006000 Commercial Equipment 0.17 0.71 1.0143 0.17 0.72 0.00 0.01

2265007010 Logging Equipment - Shredders >6Hp 0.00 0.02 1.0143 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00

2265010010 Industrial Equipment - Oil Field Equipment 0.01 0.03 1.0143 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.00

2267000000 LPG Equipment except Rail and Marine

2267002000 Construction & Mining, All 0.01 0.00 1.0490 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00

2267003000 Industrial Equipment, All 0.92 0.23 1.0490 0.97 0.24 0.05 0.01

2267004066 Lawn & Garden Equipment - Chippers/Stump Grinders (Com 0.01 0.00 1.0490 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00

2267006000 Commercial Equipment 0.07 0.01 1.0490 0.07 0.01 0.00 0.00

2268000000 CNG Equipment except Rail and Marine

2268003020 Industrial Equipment - Forklifts 0.06 0.00 1.0490 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00

2268006000 Commercial Equipment 0.07 0.00 1.0490 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00

2268010010 Industrial Equipment - Oil Field Equipment 0.03 0.16 1.0490 0.03 0.17 0.00 0.01

2270000000 CI Equipment except Rail and Marine· Diesel

2270002000 Construction & Mining, Total 7.66 0.79 1.0143 7.77 0.80 0.11 0.01

2270003000 Industrial Equipment, All 0.53 0.07 1.0143 0.54 0.07 0.01 0.00

2270004000 Lawn & Garden, All 0.10 0.02 1.0143 0.10 0.02 0.00 0.00

2270005000 Agricultural Equipment, All ' 0.39 0.05 1.0143 0.40 0.05 0.01 0.00

2270006000 Commercial Equipment 0.41 0.07 1.0143 0.42 0.07 0.01 0.00

2270007015 Logging Equipment - Forest Equipment:Feller?Bunch/Skidder 0.13 0.01 1.0143 0.13 0.01 0.00 0.00

2270008005 Airport Ground Support Equipment ,"'.' . 0.02 , 0.00 " 1.0143 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00

2270010010 Industrial Equipment - Oil Field Equipment 0.10 0.01 1.0143 0.10 0.01 0.00 0.00

2275020000 Commercial Aircraft 0.13 0.02 1.3117 0.17 0.03 0.04 0.01

443 1
Appendix· Calculation of Nonroad Source Growth

NONROAD SOURCE - OZONE SEASON WEEKDAY EMISSIONS

~"1l1!2 il~t!....I!J»la...... ,<i'- ~c t'leJ,c:,Oothm tiQ'S,L1J»Jn ){QG,C . ' ',,, O~,- ',lf~frfJ»: YQC1I~1,NO~ (Tptll YOC (TPP

2275050000 General Aviation 0.00 0.01 1.3117 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00

2275060000 Air Taxi 0.00 0.01 1.3117 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00

2280002100 Commercial Marine Vessels· Diesel:Port Emissions 5.72 0.14 1.0747 6.15 0.15 0.43 0.01

2280002200 Commercial Marine Vessels - Diesel:Underway Emissions 4.10 0.09 1.0747 4.41 0.10 0.31 0.01

2280003100 Commercial Marine Vessels - Residual:Port Emissions 8.95 0.32 1.2214 10.93 0.39 1.98 0.07

2280003200 Commercial Marine Vessels - Residual:UnderWay Emissions 1.62 0.05 1.2214 1.98 0.06 0.36 0.01

2282000000 Recreational Marine/Pleasure Craft· All Fuels

2282005010 Pleasure Craft - Gasoline, 2·Stroke, Outboard 0.18 5.64 1.0143 0.18 5.72 0.00 0.08

2282005015 Pleasure Craft - Gasoline, 2-Stroke, Personal Water Craft 0.02 0.89 1.0143 0.02 0.90 0.00 0.01

2282010005 Pleasure Craft - Gasoline, 4-Stroke, Inboard/Stemdrive 0.16 0.29 1.0143 0.16 0.29 0.00 0.00

2282020005 Pleasure Craft - Diesel, Inboard/Stemdrive 0.11 0.00 1.0143 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00

2285002006 Railroad Equipment - Diesel, Line Haul Locomotives '2.42 0.13 1.2017 2.91 0.16 0.49 0.03

2285002010 Railroad Eauipment- Diesel, Yard Locomotives 0.44 0.03 1.2017 0.53 0.04 0.09 0.01

2285002015 Railroad Equipment - Diesel, Railway Maintenance 0.02 0.00 1.2017 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00

Column Total 34.92 14.93 38.82 15.29 3.90 0.36

1. 2002 Emissions from "2002 Base Year Emissions Inventory for the Baton Rouge Nonattainment Area" dated June 2007

2. EGAS 5.0 growth factors for Aircraft, Commercial Marine, and Railroad classifications.

3. Growth for all other categories was projected from EGAS 4.0 factors.

444 2
Appendix - Calculation of Mobile Source Growth

MOBILE SOURCE - OZONE SEASON WEEKDAY EMISSIONS

Mobile NOx Emissions Mobile VOC Emissions

Growth Growth

Parish 2002 (1) 2008 (2) 2002-08 2002 (1) 2008 (2) 2002-08

Ascension 7.5 5.1 -2.4 3.8 3.3 -0.5

E. Baton Rouge 18.9 12.4 -6.5 13.9 9.0 -4.9

Iberville 4.5 3.1 -1.4 2.0 1.5 -0.5

Livingston 8.9 6.1 -2.8 4.4 3.4 -1.0

W. Baton Rouge 5.5 2.9 -2.6 2.4 1.5 -0.9

Total, tpd 45.3 29.6 -15.7 26.5 18.7 -7.8

(1) Peak Ozone Season, RVP 7.8, 2002 VMT and Emission Factors

(2) Peak Ozone Season, RVP 7.8, 2008 VMT and Emission Factors

Growth factors projected from MOBILE6.2.03 .

.•

445
AppendixH

RACM/RACT.Analysis

Section 185 Fee Determination of

Termination, Baton Rouge Nonattainment Area

Technical Amendment

TA, September 2010
1

RACM/RACT Analysis

Summary

LDEQ has performed an analysis to evaluate emission levels of oxides ofnitrogen (NOx)

and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and their relationships to the application of

current and anticipated control measures expected to be implemented in the five-parish

Baton Rouge moderate ozone nonattainment area.

Section 172(c)( 1) ofthe Act requires SIPs to provide for the implementation of all

reasonably available control measures (RACM) as necessary to provide for attainment of

the ozone standard as expeditiously as practicable. EPA has previously provided

guidance interpreting the RACM requirements of 172(c)(1) in the General Preamble (57

FR 13498, 13560). In the General Preamble, EPA indicated its interpretation ofsection

172(c)(1), under the 1990 Amendments, as imposing a duty on States to consider all

available control measures and to adopt and implement such measures as are reasonably

available for implementation in the particular nonattainment area. EPA also retained its

pre-1990 interpretation ofthe RACM provisions that where measures that might in fact

be available for implementation in the nonattainment area but could not be implemented

on a schedule that would advance the date for attainment in the area, EPA would not

consider it reasonable to require implementation ofsuch measures. EPA indicated that a

State could reject certain measures as not reasonably available for various reasons related

to local conditions. A State could include area-specific reasons for rejecting a measure as

RACM, such that the rejected measure would not advance the attainment date, or

technological and economic feasibility in the area.

The EPA issued a memorandum concerning this topic, "Guidance on the Reasonably

Available Control Measures (RACM) Requirements and Attainment Demonstration

Submissions for Ozone Nonattainment Areas," by John Seitz, Director, Office ofAir

Quality Planning and Standards, dated November 30, 1999. In this memorandum, EPA

states that in order to determine whether a state has adopted all RACM necessary for

attainment and as expeditiously as practicable, the state will need to provide justification

as to why measures within the arena ofpotential reasonable measures have not been

adopted. The justification would need to support that a measure was not reasonably

available for that area and could be based on technological or economic grounds.

Based on a review and analysis of emission reductions from potentially available control

measures, the LDEQ concludes that these evaluated control measures are not RACM for

the Baton Rouge area, because (a) some would require an intensive and costly effort for

numerous small area sources, or (b) these measures would not produce emission

reductions sufficient to advance the attainment date in the Baton Rouge area, and

therefore, should not be considered RACM under the Act.

LDEQ reached this conclusion primarily because the reductions that could be achieved

by the potential RACM measures are extremely small. These potential reductions are far

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010
2

less than the emissions reductions needed within the nonattainment area to reach

attainment.

In addition, the Baton Rouge attainment demonstration relies on emission reductions

from outside the nonattainment area (East Feliciana, Pointe Coupee, St. Helena and West

Feliciana) to reach attainment, as well as federal rules. The attainment demonstration for

the Baton Rouge area indicates that the ozone benefit expected to be achieved from

regional NOx reductions is substantial. Since the reductions from potential RACM

measures do not nearly equate to the reductions needed to maintain attainment, none of

these unadopted measures could advance the attainment date prior to full implementation

of all other required measures in the Baton Rouge area. More importantly, the

implemented NOx reductions in the Baton Rouge area were sufficient for the Baton

Rouge area to meet the NAAQS for ozone in 2008. Thus, none ofthese potential

measures should be considered RACM for the Baton Rouge area.

Mobile Sources Analysis

On-road Mobile

This subsection ofthe overall RACM analysis is presented for evaluating potential onroad mobile emission reductions that could be achieved through implementation of

transportation control measures (TCMs) in the Baton Rouge nonattainment area. LDEQ

has analyzed for RACM purposes a broad range ofTCMs that are identified and listed in

Section 108(f) ofthe CAAA. This abbreviated analysis ofTCMs is taken from the most

recent and comprehensive TCM evaluation study] that exists for the Baton Rouge

metropolitan area and reflects updated attainment year vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and

emission reduction estimates.

The basic methodology employed to analyze TCM RACM for the Baton Rouge area

consists ofthe following procedure:

1. Estimate the percentage ofVOC and NOx emissions from the vehicle types

affected by TCM implementation (light-duty vehicles, 80% and 70% ofthe VOC

and NOx emissions respectively);

2. Apply the percentages from step 1 above to the total on-road mobile emissions to

determine in tons per day the light-duty vehicle fleet emissions in the

nonattainment area;

3. Calculate the daily VOC and NOx emissions from light-duty vehicles in tons per

mile by dividing the daily emissions (tons/day) by the attainment year VMT

(mi/day);

4. Using the projected VMT reduction percentages from the TCM analysis,

calculate the reduction in VMT for each TCM analyzed;

5. For each TCM, estimate the emission reductions in tons per day based on the

corresponding reductions in VMT, and lastly;

6. Determine ifTCM implementation is feasible for RACM purposes in the Baton

Rouge nonattainment area.

I Woodward Clyde Consultants, An Evaluation ofTransportation Control Measures for the Baton Rouge

Nonattainment Area, Final Report, June 1995.

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010
3

The results ofsteps 1-3 ofthe analysis methodology are shown in Table A. The potential

ozone-precursor emission reductions from each ofthe TCMs are derived from steps 4-5

and are summarized in Table B.

Table A

Baton Rouge Attainment Year Mobile Source Emissions, Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT),

and Llzht-Dutv Vehicle Contributions to Total VOC and NOx Emissions.

Total 2005 On-Road Estimated Emissions from Attainment Daily Emissions from

Mobile Emissions (tpd) Light-Duty Vehicles (tpd) YearVMT Light-Duty Vehicles

(mi/day) (tons/mi)

VOC NOx VOC(80%) NOx (70%) VOC NOx

16.14 35.72 12.91 25.00 16,775,710 7.70E-7 1.49E-6

TableD

TCM RACM Summary: Projected 2005 VMT and Emission Reductions for the Baton

RON oU2e zone onattamment . Area.

:;,'j

-

Projected Projected

TCM Descriptions VMT VMT Projected Emission

Reductions Reductions Reductions (tpd)

(%i (mi/day) VOC NOx

1 Market Based TCMs 5.40 905,888 0.70 1.35

2 Activity Centers 4.50 754,907 0.58 1.13

3 Parking Management 3.50 587,150 0.45 0.88

4 Vehicle Use Limitations 2.80 469,720 0.36 0.70

5 Telecommuting 1.50 251,636 0.19 0.38

6 Trip Reduction 0.90 150,981 0.19 0.23

7 Employer-Based 0.90 150,981 0.12 0.23

8 Flexible Work Hours 0.90 150,981 0.12 0.23

9 HOV Facilities 0.50 83,879 0.06 0.13

10 Park-and-RidelFringe 0.45 75,491 0.06 0.11

11 Area Rideshare Program 0.28 46,972 0.04 0.07

12 Improved Public Transit 0.20 33,551 0.03 0.05

13 BicyclelPedestrian 0.01 1,678 <0.01 <0.01

14 Traffic Flow Improvements' 0.00 0 N/A N/A

Totals: 21.84 3,663,815 2.82 5.46

2 Values shown are those selected for the TCM emissions benefits calculations where percentile ranges

were noted in the Woodward Clyde analysis.

3 There are no VMT reductions associated with traffic flow improvements and emissions benefits due to

congestion relief were not quantified in the Woodward Clyde study.

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010
4

Table B is sorted in descending order and reflects from top to bottom the most effective

TCM categories that were originally analyzed in the study. The results ofthis updated

TCM analysis closely match the projected emission-reduction benefits from the analysis.

It is evident from the data in the table that there is considerable variation in the potential

for achieving emission reductions according to TCM category. Of all TCMs analyzed,

categories 1-5 offer the greatest potential for reducing on-road mobile emissions in the

Baton Rouge Metropolitan area. Packaged together, these five categories account for

about 85% ofthe total projected VMT and emission reductions. However, because ofthe

low to medium cost effectiveness (per ton ofNOx reduced) estimated historically for

these types ofmeasures, it is highly unlikely that any ofthese five TCMs would be

implemented in the Baton Rouge area.

Excluding trip reduction ordinances and HOV lanes, the remainder ofthe TCMs has the

most potential for actual implementation in the Baton Rouge nonattainment area. In

addition to fairly routine traffic flow improvement projects, flexible work-hour and

employer-based programs, rideshare programs, public transit upgrades, and

bicycle/pedestrian projects would provide air quality benefits through the year 2008 and

beyond. This analysis indicates that these types oftransportation control measures could

hypothetically reduce VMT by 2.8 percent and consequently reduce mobile source NOx

emissions by about 0.7 tons per day.

Relative to the total NOx reductions required to maintain attainment ofthe I-hour and 8-

hour ozone standard, additional NOx reductions from other TCMs in the Baton Rouge

area that might be implemented constitute a very small percentage ofthe total required

reductions (-1%). Therefore, LDEQ concludes that for RACM purposes the TCMs

analyzed would not produce emission reductions sufficienttoadvance the attainment date'

without obtaining further reductions from sources already regulated or from sources that

are scheduled for additional regulation prior to the attainment year.

Off-road Mobile

An additional mobile source measure, the Vehicle lIM program has been implemented in

the five-parish Baton Rouge ozone nonattainment area. On-Board Diagnostics testing

was implemented in 2002. There is a state statute prohibiting the expansion ofthe lIM

program beyond the five-parish area [La. R.S. 30:2054.B(8)(a)].

The 11M program achieves emission reductions very near what stringent 11M 240 testing

would have achieved at significantly less cost. Since legislative authority would have to

be sought for any lIM program expansion, and since the fleet in the Baton Rouge area is

small (approximately 400,000 subject to the lIM program), LDEQ concludes that the

state has applied RACM for the 11M program, in that expansion ofthe 11M program could

not be accomplished so as to advance the attainment date for the Baton Rouge

nonattainment area.

Additionally, for off-road emissions, states are generally pre-empted from setting

emissions standards for off-road mobile sources. In view oflocal feasibility and the

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010
5

economic impact of use restrictions, the LDEQ has determined that further off-road

measures are not RACM.

Major Stationary Sources Analysis

VOC Major Sources

Sensitivity runs completed during the early stages ofthe Baton Rouge ozone attainment

modeling analysis indicated that a NOx control strategy was most effective in reducing

ozone in the Baton Rouge area. In addition, the CAA required 24% Rate-of-Progress

VOC emission reductions have been achieved in the Baton Rouge nonattainment area.

Further VOC reductions at this time are deemed to be technologically infeasible as well

as not cost effective and would not advance the attainment date for the area. Louisiana

has implemented RACT4 on all major stationary sources of VOC in the Baton Rouge

nonattainment area. The threshold for RACT applicability in the Baton Rouge area is 25

tons per year. The state regulations fulfilling the VOC RACT requirement are shown in

Table 1 and Table 2 ofthis document.

NOx Major Sources

The Baton Rouge NOx control strategy was modeled after the approved strategy for

Beaumont/Port Arthur. Although minor modifications were made in the Baton Rouge

plan to tailor it to local conditions, EPA reviewed the proposed NOx control rule and

provided no negative comments on the proposed emission factors. In the Baton Rouge

area the plan will reduce NOx by approximately 77 tons per day, which, along with

additional reductions from mobile sources and federal rules has been sufficient to reduce

ozone for the Baton Rouge area to meet the NAAQS in 2008. Moreover, since the

emission limits in the proposed rule are deemed to be beyond RACT, which is definedby

EPA as the lowest achievable emission rate considering technical and economic

feasibility, the LDEQ considers the Baton Rouge area NOx control plan RACM for major

sources.

The NOx control rule establishes requirements for reducing emissions ofNOx during the

ozone season in the Baton Rouge 5-parish Nonattainment Area (Ascension, East Baton

Rouge, Iberville, Livingston, and West Baton Rouge) and from point sources in the

Region ofInfluence (the attainment parishes ofEast Feliciana, Pointe Coupee, St. Helena

and West Feliciana Parishes). Affected facilities include those with one or more sources

that collectively emit or have the potential to emit 25 tons per year or more ofNOx.

The rule establishes emission factors for reducing NOx emissions from boilers, heaters,

furnaces, turbines and internal combustion engines. Further, the rule establishes

requirements for permits, compliance, record keeping and reporting. The rule achieves, at

a minimum, the emission reductions relied on in the attainment ofthe NAAQS. The state

regulation fulfilling the NOx RACT requirement is shown in Table 1 ofthis document.

4 RACT is defined as the lowest emissions limitation that a particular source is capable ofmeeting by the

application of control technology that is reasonably available considering technological and economic

feasibility.

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010
6

The rule proposes the following limits:

• Electric Power Generating System Boilers

Coal-fired> 40 to < 80 MMBtu!hr

Coal-fired g 80 MMBtu/hr

No.6 fuel oil-fired g 40 to < 80 MMBtu!hr

No.6 fuel oil-fired g 80 MMBtu!hr

All others (gaseous or liquid) :::: 40 to < 80 MMBtu/hr

All others (gaseous or liquid) :::: 80 MMBtu/hr

Industrial Boilers g 40 to < 80 MMBtu/hr

Industrial Boilers g 80 MMBtu/hr

• Process Heater/Fumaces

Ammonia reformers > 40 to < 80 MMBtu/hr

Ammonia reformers g 80 MMBtu/hr

All others> 40 to < 80 MMBtu/hr

All others > 80 MMBtu/hr

• Stationary Gas Turbines

Peaking Service, Fuel Oil-fired g 5 to < 10 MW

Peaking Service, Fuel Oil-fired> 10 MW

Peaking Service, Gas-fired> 5 to < 10 MW

Peaking Service, Gas-fired> 10 MW

All Others> 5 to < 10 MW

All Others> 10 MW

• Stationary Internal Combustion Engines

Lean-bum engines> 150 to < 320 Hp :

Lean-bum engines > 320 Hp

Rich-bum engines> 150 to < 300 Hp

Rich-bum engines > 300 Hp

0.50 Ib/MMBtu

0.211b/MMBtu

0.30 Ib/MMBtu

0.18Ib/MMBtu

0.20 Ib/MMBtu

0.10 Ib/MMBtu

0.20 Ib/MMBtu

0.10 Ib/MMBtu

0.30 Ib/MMBtu

0.23 Ib/MMBtu

0.18Ib/MMBtu

0.08 Ib/MMBtu

0.37Ib/MMBtu

0.30 Ib/MMBtu

0.27 Ib/MMBtu

0.20 Ib/MMBtu

0.24Ib/MMBtu

0.16Ib/MMBtu

10 g/Hp-hr

4 g/Hp-hr

2 g/Hp-hr

2g/Hp-hr

The rule required that NOx controls be operational by May 1, 2005.

Area Sources Analysis

VOC Area Sources

The Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 172(c)(1) provides that State Implementation Plans

(SIPs) for nonattainment areas must include "reasonably available control measures"

(RACM), including "reasonably available control technology" (RACT), for sources of

emissions. Section 182(b)(2)(A) provides that for certain nonattainment areas, States

must revise their SIPs to include RACT for sources of VOC emissions covered by a

control techniques guidelines (CTG) document issued after November 15, 1990 and prior

to the area's date of attainment.

The CAA Section 183(e) directs EPA to list for regulation those categories of products

that account for at least 80 percent of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, on a

reactivity-adjusted basis, from consumer and commercial products in areas that violate

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010
7

the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone (i.e., ozone

nonattainment areas). EPA issued the list on March 23, 1995, and has revised the list

periodically. [See 60 FR 15264 (March 23, 1995); see also 71 FR 28320 (May 16,2006),

70 FR 69759 (November 17,2005); 64 FR 13422 (March 18, 1999)].

The CTGs are intended to provide state and local air pollution control authorities

information that should assist them in determining RACT for VOCs from multiple source

categories. In developing the CTGs, EPA evaluated the sources of VOC emissions from

these categories and the available control approaches for addressing these emissions,

including the costs of such approaches. Based on available information and data, EPA

provides recommendations for RACT for these categories. .

The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) published an Advanced

Notice of Potential Rulemaking (ANPR) on August 20, 2008 for rules covering the

following CTGs: flat wood paneling; large appliance coatings; metal furniture coatings;

lithographic printing and letterpress printing; paper, film, and foil coatings; flexible

package printing; and industrial cleaning solvents. Comments were received for this

ANPR and minor changes were made to the rule. The department published a proposed

rule for these CTGs on December 20, 2008. Based on comments received for this

proposal, technical amendments were made to the rule and the final rule was published in

the Louisiana Register on June 20, 2009 (AQ 296 - Appendix A). This rulemaking was

initiated due to the changes that EPA made to these CTGs which were published in the

Federal Register on October 5, 2007 and October 9,2007.

The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) published an Advanced

Notice of Potential Rulemaking (ANPR) on August 20, 2009 for rules covering the

following CTGs: miscellaneous industrial adhesives, miscellaneous metal and plastic

parts coatings, fiberglass boat manufacturing materials, and automobile and light-duty

truck coatings. Comments were received for this ANPR and minor changes were made to

the rule. The department published a proposed rule for these CTGs on March 20,2010.

Based on comments received for this proposal, technical amendments were made to the

rule and the final rule was published in the Louisiana Register on August 20, 2010 (AQ

310 - Appendix A). This rulemaking was initiated due to the changes that EPA made to

these CTGs which were published in the Federal Register on October 7, 2008. The state

regulations fulfilling the VOC RACT requirements are shown in Table 1 of this

document.

Since the above categories are already controlled in the Baton Rouge nonattainment area,

there are little or no remaining potentially available emission reductions. Therefore, the

amount ofreduction available from additional controls on area sources is minimal and

would not advance the attainment date for the Baton Rouge area. Also, area sources are

mainly a source ofVOCs. The Baton Rouge area has concentrated more on NOx

controls because ozone modeling demonstrated that NOx controls produce more

significant ozone reductions.

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010
8

NOx Area Sources

NOx area sources are smaller and more numerous than the VOC area sources. Therefore,

control of NOx area sources would be expensive and require an intensive effort. In

addition, the EPA stated the following in EPA's final rule on the NOx SIP call:

"Area Sources. In the NPR, EPA noted that control levels for area sources (i.e.,

sources other than mobile or point sources) could not be determined based on

available information concerning applicable control technologies. Comments to

the NPR did not identify specific NOx control technologies that were both

technologically feasible and highly cost-effective. Because EPA has no new

information on applicable control technologies for area sources, no additional

control level is assumed for these sources in this rulemaking. (63 FR 57402,

October 27, 1998.)"

As a result, controls on these categories are not considered reasonably available.

Conclusion

LDEQ has concluded from its modeling analysis that NOx emission reductions are the

most effective way to reduce ozone. In the Baton Rouge attainment modeling, proposed

NOx reductions from major stationary sources, mobile sources and federal rules are

shown to be sufficient for the Baton Rouge area to meet the NAAQS for ozone.

LDEQ does not believe that additional VOC reductions are technologically feasible or

cost effective at this time. VOC reductions would not advance the attainment date and

are not as effective in reducing ozone in the Baton Rouge area as demonstrated in the

modeling.

Furthermore, as shown in the modeled attainment demonstration, the Baton Rouge area

relies upon emissions reductions from outside ofthe nonattainment area and from federal

rules with implementation dates prior to 2005. Thus, there are no other reasonably

available control measures that could advance the attainment date for the Baton Rouge

area.

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010
9

Table 1: State Rules Addressing RACT Requirements in CTG and ACT Reference

Documents ==~"..".

Aerospace

Agricultural

Pesticides

Architectural and

Industrial

Maintenance

Coatin s

Automobile

Coating

Automobile

Coating

Automobile

Refinishing

Batch Processes

Guideline Series: Control ofVolatile

Organic Compound Emissions from

Coating Operations at Aerospace

Manufacturing and Rework Operations

(EPA-4531R-97-004, EPA-68/D1-

00115, EPA-453/D-96-016, December

1997)

Control ofVolatile Organic Compound

Emissions from the Application of

Agricultural Pesticides (EPA-4501R-92-

011, March 1993)

Reduction ofVolatile Organic

Compound Emissions from Application

ofTraffic Markings (EPA-450/3-88-

007, August 1988)

The Reduction ofVolatile Organic

Compound Emissions from Automobile

Refinishing (EPA-450/3-88-009,

October 1988

Control Techniques Guidelines for

Automobile and Light-Duty truck

Assembly Coatings (EPA-4531R-08-

006, September 2008) and Protocol for

Determining the Daily Volatile Organic

Compound Emission Rate of

Automobile and Light-Duty Truck

Primer-Surfacer and Topcoat Operations

(EPA-4531R-08-002, S tember 2008)

Alternative Control Techniques

Document: Automobile Body

Refinishing (EPA-4531R-94-031 , April

1994)

Alternative Control Techniques

Document: Control ofVolatile Organic

Compound Emissions from Batch

Processes (EPA4531R-93-017 or EPANo existing major sources

in the 5-parish Baton

Rouge ozone area.

The LDEQ does not

regulate the use of

agricultural pesticides and

this ACT document does

not give presumptive

control therefore, no

RACT determination is

required for this source

cate ory.

Emissions from this

source category are

regulated by the AIM

National Rule.

LAC 33:III.2123 ,~L

LAC 33:III.2123

LAC 33:III.2123

LAC 33:III.2149

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010
10

453/R-93-020, February 1994

Bulk Gasoline Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:111.2133 and

Plants from Bulk Gasoline Plants (EPA-450/2- LAC 33:111.2135

77-035, December 1977)

Cleaning Alternative Control Techniques LAC 33:IIT.2125 and LAC

Solvents Document: Industrial Cleaning Solvents 33:111.2151

(EPA-453/R-94-015, February 1994)

Cleaning Control Techniques Guidance for LAC 33:111.2123

Solvents Industrial Cleaning Solvents (EPA453/R-06-001, September 2006)

Commercial Alternative Control Techniques No existing major sources

Bakeries Document: Bakery Ovens (EPA-453/R- in the 5-parish Baton

92-017, December 1992) Rouge ozone area

Cutback Asphalt Control ofVolatile Organic Compounds LAC 33:111.2127

from Use ofCutback Asphalt (EPA450/2-77-037, December 1977)

Fugitive Fugitive Emission Sources ofOrganic LAC 33:111.2121 and

Emissions Compounds - Additional Information LAC 33:111.2122

on Emissions, Emission Reductions, and

Costs (EPA-450/3-82-010, April 1982)

Gasoline Service Design Criteria for Stage I Vapor LAC 33:111.2131

Stations Control Systems - Gasoline Service

Stations (November 1975)

'Gasoline Service

Stations

Graphic Arts Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:111.2143

from Existing Stationary Sources,

Volume VIII: Graphic Arts -

Rotogravure and Flexography (EPA-

'450/2-78-033, December 1978)

Graphic Arts Control ofVolatile Organic Compound LAC 33:111.2143

Emissions from Offset Lithographic

Printing (September 1993)

Graphic Arts Alternative Control Technology LAC 33:111.2143

Document: Offset Lithographic Printing

(EPA-453/R-94-054, June 1994)

Graphic Arts Control Techniques Guidelines for LAC 33:111.2143

Offset Lithographic Printing and

Letterpress Printing (EPA-453/R-06-

002, September 2006)

Graphic Arts Control Techniques Guidelines for LAC 33:111.2143

Flexible Package Printing (EPA-453/R06-003, September 2006)

Industrial Control Techniques for Industrial LAC 33:111.2153

Wastewater Wastewater (EPA-453/D-93-056,

September 1992)

RACT/RACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010
11

Ink and Paint Alternative Control Technology No existing major sources

Manufacturing Document: Control ofVolatile Organic in the 5-parish Baton

Compounds from Ink and Paint Rouge ozone area.

Manufacturing (EPA-453/3-92-013

Leather Tanning Alternative Control Technology No existing major sources

and Finishing Document: Leather Tanning and in the 5-parish Baton

Operations Finishing Operations (EPA-453/3-93- Rouge ozone area.

025)

Metal Furniture Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:II1.2123

from Existing Stationary Sources,

Volume III: Surface Coating ofMetal

Furniture (EPA-450/2-77-032,

December 1977)

Natural Control ofVolatile Organic Compound LAC 33:111.2104

Gas/Gasoline Equipment Leaks from Natural

Processing Gas/Gasoline Processing Plants (EPA450/3-83-007, September 1982)

Petroleum Dry Control ofVolatile Organic Compound No existing major sources

Cleaners Emissions from Large Petroleum Dry in the 5-parish Baton

Cleaners (EPA-450/3-82-009) Rouge ozone area.

Petroleum Liquid Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:111.2103

Storage from Storage ofPetroleum Liquids in

Fixed Roof Tanks (EPA-450/2-77-036)

Petroleum Liquid Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:II1.2103

Storage in External Floating Roof Tanks (EPA450/2-78-047, December 1978) -.--.

','

Petroleum Liquid Alternative Control Techniques LAC 33:III.2103

Storage Document: Volatile Organic Liquid

Storage in floating and Fixed Roof

Tanks (EPA-453/R-94-001, January

1994)

Plywood Veneer Control Techniques for Organic No existing major sources

Dryers Emissions from Plywood Veneer Dryers in the 5-parish Baton

(EPA-450/3-83-012, May 1983) Rouge ozone area.

Process Vents Alternative Control Technology LAC 33:111.2115

Document: Organic Waste Process

Vents (EPA-450/3-91-007, December

1990)

Refineries Control ofRefinery Vacuum Producing LAC 33:111.2139 and

Systems, Wastewater Separators, and LAC 33:111.2141

Process Unit Turnarounds (EPA-450/2-

77-025, October 1977)

Refineries Control ofVolatile Organic Compound LAC 33:111.2121 and

Leaks from Petroleum Refinery LAC 33:111.2122

Equipment (EPA-450/2-78-036, June

1978)

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010
12

Rubber Tires Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions No existing major sources

from Manufacture ofPneumatic Rubber in the 5-parish Baton

Tires (EPA-450/2-78-030, December Rouge ozone area.

1978)

Shipbuilding and Control Technique Guidance for LAC 33:III.2123

Ship Repair Shipbuilding and Ship Repair

Operations (EPA-453/R-94-032, April

1994)

Shipbuilding and Control Techniques Guidelines for LAC 33:III.2123

Ship Repair Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Surface

Coating Operations (61 FR 44050,

August 27, 1996)

Solvent Cleaning Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:III.2125

from Solvent Metal Cleaning (EPA450/2-77-022, November 1977)

Surface Coating Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:III.2123

from Existing Stationary Sources,

Volume I: Control Methods for Surface

Coating Operation (EPA-450/2-76-028,

November 1976

Surface Coating Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:ill.2123

from Existing Stationary Sources,

Volume II: Surface Coating ofCans,

Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and

Light-Duty Trucks (EPA-450/2-77-008,

May 1977)

Surface Coating Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:III.2123

from Existing Stationary Sources,

Volume IV: Surface Coating for

Insulation ofMagnet Wire (EPA-450/2-

77-033, December 1977)

Surface Coating Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:III.2123

from Existing Stationary Sources,

Volume V: Surface Coating ofLarge

Appliances (EPA-450/2-77-034,

December 1977)

Surface Coating Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:III.2123

from Existing Stationary Sources,

Volume VI: Surface Coating of

Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products

(EPA-450/2-78-015, June 1978)

Surface Coating Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:III.2123

from Existing Stationary Sources,

Volume VII: Factory Surface Coating of

Flat Wood Paneling (EPA-450/2-78-

032, June 1978)

RACT/RACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010
13

Surface Coating Alternative Control Techniques LAC 33:II1.2123

Document: Surface Coating of

Automotive/Transportation and

Business Machine Plastic Parts (EPA453/R-94-017, February 1994)

Surface Coating Control Techniques Guidelines for Flat LAC 33:II1.2123

Wood Paneling Coatings (EPA-453/R06-004, September 2006)

Surface Coating Control Techniques Guidelines for LAC 33:111.2123

Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings (EPA453/R-07-003, September 2007)

Surface Coating Control Techniques Guidelines for LAC 33:111.2123

Large Appliance Coatings (EPA-453/R07-004, September 2007)

Surface Coating Control Techniques Guidelines for LAC 33:111.2123

Metal Furniture Coatings (EPA-453/R07-005, September 2007)

Surface Coating Control Techniques Guidelines for LAC 33:111.2123

Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts

Coatings (EPA-453/R-08-003,

., , September 2008)

Surface Coating Control Techniques Guidelines for LAC 33:111.2123

Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing

Materials (EPA-453/R-08-004,

September 2008)

Surface Coating Control Techniques Guidelines for LAC 33:111.2123

Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives .__ ._.

(EPA-453/R-08-005, September 2008)

Synthetic Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions LAC 33:111.2145

Organic from Manufacture of Synthesized

Chemical Pharmaceutical Products (EPA-450/2-

Manufacturing 78-029, December 1978)

Industry

Synthetic Control ofVolatile Organic Compound LAC 33:111.2147

Organic Emissions form Manufacture ofHighChemical Density Polyethylene, Poly propylene,

Manufacturing and Polystyrene Resins (EPA450/3-83-

Industry 008, November 1983)

Synthetic Control ofVolatile Organic Compound LAC 33:111.2121 and

Organic Fugitive Emissions from Synthetic LAC 33:111.2122

Chemical Organic Chemical Polymer and Resin

Manufacturing Manufacturing Equipment (EPA-450/3-

Industry 83-006, March 1984)

Synthetic Control ofVolatile Organic Compound LAC 33:111.2147

Organic Emissions from Air Oxidation Processes

Chemical in Synthetic Organic Chemical

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010
14

LAC 33:111.2137

No existing major sources

in the 5-parish Baton

Rou e ozone area.

No existing major sources

in the 5-parish Baton

Rouge ozone area.

LAC 33:111.2147

LAC 33:111.2147

No existing major sources

in the 5-parish Baton

Rouge ozone area.

LAC 33:111.2137

Guideline Series: Control ofVolatile

Organic Compound Emissions from

Wood Furniture Manufacturing

erations (EPA-453/D-95-002

Guidelines Series: Control ofVolatile

Organic Compound Emissions from

Wood Furniture Manufacturing

Operations (EPA-453/R-96-007, April

1996

Control ofVolatile Organic Emissions

from Manufacture ofVegetable Oils

(EPA-450/2-78-035, June 1978

Control ofVolatile Organic Compound

Leaks from Gasoline Tank Trucks and

Vapor Collection Systems (EPA-450/2-

78-051, December 1978)

Polystyrene Foam Manufacturing (EPA450/3-90-020, 1990)

Control ofHydrocarbons from Tank

Truck Gasoline Loading Terminals

(EPA-450/2-77-026, December 1977

Control ofVolatile Organic Compound

Emissions From Reactor Processes and

Distillation Operations in Synthetic

Organic Chemical Manufacturing

Industry (EPA-450/4-91-031, August

1993)

Manufacturing Industry (EPA-450/3-84-

015, December 1984)

Vegetable Oil

Manufacturing

Tank Trucks

Electric Power Generatin System Boilers:

Wood Furniture

Manufacturing

Wood Furniture

Manufacturing

Manufacturing

Indus

Synthetic

Organic

Chemical

Manufacturing

Industry

Tank Trucks

Synthetic

Organic

Chemical

Manufacturing

Industry

Coal-fired Controlling Nitrogen Oxides Under the LAC 33:111.2201

Clean Air Act: A Menu ofOptions

(STAPPAIALAPCO, Jul 1994)

Number 6 Fuel Controlling Nitrogen Oxides Under the LAC 33:111.2201

Oil-fired Clean Air Act: A Menu ofOptions

(STAPPAIALAPCO, Jul 1994)

All Otheres Controlling Nitrogen Oxides Under the LAC 33:111.2201

(gaseous or Clean Air Act: A Menu ofOptions

Ii uid (STAPPAIALAPCO, Jul 1994

Industrial Boilers Controlling Nitrogen Oxides Under the LAC 33:111.2201

Clean Air Act: A Menu ofOptions

(STAPPAIALAPCO, July 1994)

RACT/RACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010
15

Process HeaterlFurnaces:

Ammonia Controlling Nitrogen Oxides Under the LAC 33:111.2201

Reformers Clean Air Act: A Menu ofOptions

(STAPPAIALAPCO, July 1994)

All Others Controlling Nitrogen Oxides Under the LAC 33:111.2201

Clean Air Act: A Menu of Options

(STAPPAIALAPCO, July 1994)

Stationary Gas Turbines:

Peaking Service, Controlling Nitrogen Oxides Under the LAC 33:111.2201

Fuel Oil-fired Clean Air Act: A Menu of Options

(STAPPAIALAPCO, July 1994)

Peaking Service, Controlling Nitrogen Oxides Under the LAC 33:111.2201

Gas-fired Clean Air Act: A Menu ofOptions

(STAPPAIALAPCO, July 1994)

All Others Controlling Nitrogen Oxides Under the LAC 33:111.2201

Clean Air Act: A Menu ofOptions

(STAPPAIALAPCO, July 1994)

Stationary Internal Combustion Engines:

Lean-burn Controlling Nitrogen Oxides Under the LAC 33:111.2201

Clean Air Act: A Menu of Options

...1."" (STAPPAIALAPCO, July 1994)

Rich-burn Controlling Nitrogen Oxides Under the LAC 33:ID.2201

Clean Air Act: A Menu of Options

(STAPPAIALAPCO, July 1994)

Table 2: VOC Emissions - Rules in Addition to RACT

VOC Loadin

Marine Vapor

Recovery

OiVWater

Se aration

Pumps and

Com ressors

Glycol

Dehydrators

61FR38591

59FR23166

Has not been published in Federal

Register

LAC 33:111.2107

LAC 33:111.2108

LAC 33:111.2109

LAC 33:111.2111

LAC 33:111.2116

RACTIRACM Analysis for BRNA August 2010
AQ,mcy! 1%fuj,a,,~;fIi<im~ '. ,."""',' ". ',,' .". ",,': .','.

"PARIS~; . NOX.tPY,: .. ::,-0''2 l.:AC:33;1II.22Q1 other ,,", '" '>.. , ....; ... ,,;,. "

248 Oeltech Corp - Baton Rouge Facility East Baton Rou e 280.73 X

285 ExxonMobil Chemical Co - Baton Rouge Plastics Plant East Baton Rou e 457.42 X

286 ExxonMobii Corp - Baton Rouge Chemical Plant East Baton Rou e 4938.51 X

288 Formosa Plastics Corp Louisiana East Baton Rou e 1127.94 X

289 Honevwellintemational Inc - Baton Rouge South Works East Baton Rou e 7506 X

1093 LC Geismar Services LLC - Geismar Facilitv Ascension 1008.48 X

1136 Shell Chemical Co - Geismar Plant Ascension 1221.59 X

1138 Westlake Vinyls Co LP Ascension 290.44 X

1186 Entergy Gulf States LA LLC - Louisiana Station Electrical Generating Plant East Baton Rouge 4008.9 X

1306 Cora Texas Manufacturing Co Iberville 550.16 does not operate during ozone season

1314 Rhodia Inc East Baton Rouge 211.97 40 CFR 60 Subpart Db, further controls are not economically feasible

1395 Lion Copolymer LLC - Baton Rouge Plant East Baton Rouge 564.19 X

1409 The Dow Chemical Co - Louisiana Operations Iberville 8894.86 X

1413 UOP LLC - Baton Rouge Plant East Baton Rouqe 47.28 NOx controls are not economicallv feasible

1468 Rubicon LLC c Geismar Plant Ascension 376.51 NOx controls are not economicallv feasible

1607 TOTAL Petrochemicals USA Inc - Cos-Mar Co Iberville 1348.71 X

2049 BASF Corp - Geismar Sile Ascension 1999.01 X

2082 Honevwellintemational Inc 'Geismar Complex Ascension 172.98 X

2218 Praxair Inc - Geismar HYCO Facility Ascension 623.38 X

2245 Terra Mississippi Nitrogen Inc -Donaldsonviae Facility Ascension 1311.94 X

2366 Placid Refining Co LLC - Port Allen Refinerv West Baton Rouge 662.59 X

2367 svncenta Crop Protection Inc - St Gabriel Plant lberville 636.98 X

2416 CF Industries Inc - Donaldsonville NitroQen Complex Ascension 3879.97 X

2455 Georoia Gulf Chemicals & Vinvls LLC - Plaquemine Division Iberville 3195.89 X

2617 GeorQia-Pacific Consumer Operations LLC - Port Hudson Operations East Baton Rouoe 6612.45 NOx" 0.10 Ib/MMBtu, complies through BACT

2625 Entergy Gulf States LA LLC - Willow Glen Plant Ibeeville 23758 X

2638 ExxonMobil Baton Rouge Refinery East Baton Rouce 5323.7 X

2644 Pioneer Americas LLC .;5t Gabriel Facility lbeeville 58.94 X

2679 AirProducts & Chemicals Inc - Syngas Plant #1 Ascension 77.96 X

3263 Taminco Higher Amines Inc Iberville 115.84 X

3302 Crosstex Processing Services LLC -Riverside Fractionation Ascension 138.93 X

3387 NoYolvte Technoloqies Inc East Baton Rouge 39.27 40 CFR 60 Subpart Dc, further controls are not economically feasible

3400 OxvChem - Geismar Plant Ascension 314.2 X

3420 Ormet Primarv Aluminum Corp - Bumside Alumina Plant Ascension 931.61 NOx controls are not economically feasible

3519 ExxonMobil Chemical Co - Baton Rouce Polvolefins Plant East Baton Rouqe 289.76 X

3732 PCS Nilrogen Fertilizer LP - Geismar-Agricuijural Nitrogen & Phosphate Plant Ascension 2903.43 X

4174 Sid Richardson Carbon & Energv Co West Baton Rouge 386.17 NOx controls are not economically feasible

4197 Southem Natural Gas Co - While Castle Compressor Station Iberville 519.73 X

4762 Enterprise Gas Processing LLC - Tebone Fractionation Plant Ascension 71.02 X

4803 BFt - Colonial Landfill Ascension 39.14 NOx controls are not economically feasible

5176 TOTAL Petrochemicals USA Inc - Carville Polvstyrene Plant Iberville 89.45 X

5540 Louisiana State Universitv - LSU East Baton Rouqe 430.69 X

5565 Williams Olefins LLC - Geismar EthYlene Plant Ascension 1581.36 X

7359 White Castle Compressor Station lbeeville 465.8 X

8007 Florida Gas Transmission Co - Zachary Compressor Station #8 East Baton Rouge 512.39 X

8055 State of Louisiana Militarv - Gillis W LoOQ Center Iberville 64.42 40 CFR 60 Subpart Db, further controls are not economically feasible

8056 Plaquemine Point Shipyard Ibeeville 25.48 NOx controls are not economicallv feasible

9495 BASF Com - Port Allen Works West Baton Rouoe 73.03 NOx controls are not economicallv feasible

11416 Chevron Pice Line Co - Sorrento Underground Gas Storage Facilitv Ascension 148.84 X

11767 Waste Management of Louisiana LLC - Woodside Sanilarv Landfill & Recycling Center Livingston 65.32 NOx controls are not economically feasible

17161 ExxonMobil Production Corp - Baton Rouge Gas Plant West Baton Rouge 227.13 X

17383 Crosstex L1GLLC - Mvrtle Grove Station lbeeville 83.13 X

19184 Crosstex UG liQuids LLC - Plaquemine Gas Plant lberville 150.08 X

19338 Petroleum Fuel & Terminal Co - Port Allen Terminal West Baton Rouqe 25.63 NOx controls are not economicallv feasible

19875 Weyerhaeuser NR Co - Holden Wood Products LivinQston 50.34 NOx controls are not economicallv feasible

25344 Criterion Catalysts & Technotoqies LP- Port Allen Plant West Baton Rouge 49.48 40 CFR 60 Subpart Dc, further controls are not economicallY feasible

26034 Louisiana Energy & Power Authomv LEPA - Plaouemine Steam Electric Power Plant Ibeeville 492.66 40 CFR 60 Subpart D, further controls are not economically feasible

29884 Oxbow Calcining LLC - Baton Rouoe Calcined Coke Plant East Baton Rouge 1234.8 NOx controls are not economically feasible

31128 East Baton Rouge Parish North Landfill East Baton Rouge 29.73 NOx controls are not economically feasible
Agen!;¥' QompanY~~rn" c < >;~ :i . '.. ~.,;,;.,~. :.. ,;': . < F'A~SH, ~i: NOXTPY

'. L;l\;C:~3.11I,2201 . Other "C" .' .... ,

31513 Air Liquide Laroe Industries US LP - Geismar Ascension 387.28 40 CFR 60 Subpart Db and Dc, further controls are not economically feasible

32133 Bayou Sorrel Comrninolino Facilrty Iberville 42.46 X

32135 Whrte Castle Field Production Facilrtv lberville 37,88 X

32141 Chevron Pipe Line Co - Tallv Ho Compressor Station Iberville 26.76 X

32145 Northwest Bayou Choctaw Production Facility Iberville 25.34 X

32146 Bayou Choctaw Field Production Facilrtv Iberville 32.29 NOx controls are not economically feasible

32161 Bayou Henry Field Production Facilitv lberville 28.9 NOx controls are not economicall feasible

33564 Cooper T Smith Stevedoring Co - America Weioh Ria Loadino & Transfer Facilitv Ascension 89,71 NOx controls are not economicall feasible

33687 Cooper T Smrth Stevedoring Co - Terrence Derrick Ascension 60.87 NOx controls are not economicall feasible

33689 Ports America Louisiana LLC - Derrick Barge Mickey Ascension 36.64 NOx controls are not econornicall feasible

39945 Ormet Corp - Burnside Bulk Marine Terminal - Division of Orrnet Primary Aluminum Corp Ascension 78.1 NOx controls are not economicall feasible

40198 Enterprise Products Operating LLC - Baton Rouge Act FraclPCU West Baton Rouoe 115.9 40 CFR 60 Suboart GG and Db, further controls are not economicallv feasible

43634 Trinrtv Marine Products Inc - Plant #48 West Baton Rouge 33.51 NOx controls are not economicallY feasible

46968 Mid-America Resources Corp - Sorrento Field Production Facilrtv Ascension 54.03 X

51854 Carville EnereY LLC - Carville Enemy Center lberville 1533,04 40 CFR 60 Subpart GG and Da, further controls are not economically feasible

67572 E I Duoont de Nemours & Co Inc - Burnside Plant A H2S04 Contact Facilrtv Ascension 77.19 40 CFR 60 Subpart De, further controls are not economically feasible

83425 Shintech Louisiana LLC - Addis Plant A West Baton Rouge 67,5 X

83718 LDH Enemy Refinery Services LLC - Geismar Fractionation Plant Ascension 65,36 40 CFR 60 Subpart GG and De, further controls are not economically feasible

85652 Dow Chemical Co (The ) - Plaquemine Coaeneration Plant Iberville 854.4 40 CFR 60 Subpart GG and Da, further controls are not economically feasible

85899 Industrial Coatines Contractors 1nc Ascension 30.8 40 CFR 60 Subpart /III, further controls are not economically feasible

88139 Port Hudson Central Tank Battery East Baton Rouge 45.72 X

121482 Associated Terminals of Baton Rouoe LLC West Baton Rouqe 33.06 NOx controls are not economically feasible

126578 Shintech Louisiana LLC - Plaouemine PVC Plant lberville 231 X

152442 Wilbert #4 Tank Battery - White Castle Field Iberville 26,3 NOx controls are not economically feasible

154867 Air Products &Chemicals Inc - Baton Rouoe Hvdroqen Plant- Steam Methane Reformino Facility East Baton Rouee 44.1 X

156077 A Wilbert's Sons LLC 88 #2 Production Facilitv West Baton Rouae 34.01 40 CFR 60 Subpart JJJJ,further controls are not economically feasible

166443 Flopam Inc - Flopam Facilrty Iberville 236.25 40 CFR 60 Suboart De, further controls are not economically feasible
~~ric;y; CoinpanyN!lin~ PARISH VOC LAC:33.11121 Other Jn~lirest T!'Y 2103 2104 2101 2108z 2109 2111 2113 2115 2116 2121 2122 2123 2125 2121 2129 2131 2132' 2133 2135 2131 2139 2141 2143 2141 2149 2151 2153 -.-,,-

East Baton

248 Deltech Corp - Baton Rouge Facility Rouge 90.628 X X X X

ExxonMobil Chemical Co - Baton Rouge East Baton

285 Plastics Plant Rouge 751.88 X X X X X

ExxonMobil Corp - Baton Rouge East Baton

286 Chemical Plant Rouge 4128.8 X X X X X X X X X X X

East Baton

288 Formosa Plastics Corp Louisiana Rouge 358.59 X X X X X X X

Honeyweil International Inc - Baton East Baton

289 Rouge South Works Rouge 336.07 X X X X X

West

Baton

302 TT Barge Services Mile 237 Rouge 48.27 X X

ExxonMobil Corp - Baton Rouge East Baton

332 Terminal #5005 Rouge 91.2 X X X X X X X

Plantation Pipe Line Co - Baton Rouge East Baton

582 Breakout Tank Farm Rouge 3572 X X X X

Albemarle Corp - Process Developmeni East Baton

669 Center Rouge 92.68 X X

West

ExxonMobil Refining & Supply Co - - Baton

858 Anchorage Tank Farm • Rouge 128.71 X X X X

1093 Facility Ascension 27.83 X X

1136 Shell Chemical Co - Geismar Plant Ascension 1088 X X X X X X X X X X

1138 Westlake Vinyls Co LP Ascension 249.7 X X X X X X

Entergy Gulf States LA LLC - Louisiana East Baton

1186 Station Electrical Generating Plant Rouge 84.94 X X X

does not operate

1306 Cora Texas Manufacturing Co Iberviile 33.78 X X during ozone season

East Baton

1314 Rhodia Inc Rouge 77.31 X X X X X X X X

East Baton

1395 Lion Copolymer LLC - Baton Rouge Plant Rouge 534.89 X X X X X X

1409 Operations lberville 3157.7 X X X X X X X X X X X X

1433 Facility Ascension 1652.3 X X X X X X X X

1468 Rubicon LLC - Geismar Plant Ascension 303.22 X X X X X X X X

1607 MarCo Iberville 383.93 X X X

West

BP Lubricants USA Inc - Port Allen Baton

1648 Facility Rouge 38.73 X X X

2049 BASF Corp - Geismar Site Ascension 319.26 X X X X X X X

2082 Complex Ascension 69.68 X X X

2218 Praxair Inc - Geismar HYCO Facility Ascension 93.66 X X X X

2245 Donaldsonville Facility Ascension 102.69 X X
Agenl:Y' voc ".' LAC:33.111.21 CQmpany NaQle PARISH Other Int!irA!.st .",' TPY 2103 2104 2107 2108 2109 2111 2113 2115 2116 .2121 2122 2123 2125 2127 2129 2131 2132 2133 2135 2137 2139 2141 2143 2147 2149 2151 2153

West

Placid Refining Co LLC . Port Allen Baton

2366 Refinery Rouge 377.75 X X X X X X X X X X

2367 Plant Iberville 460.98 X X X X X

2416 Nitrogen Complex Ascension 261.24 X X X X

Georgia Gulf Chemicals & Vinyls LLC •

2455 Plaquemine Division Iberville 588.17 X X X X X X

Georqia-Pacific Consumer Operations East Baton

2617 LLC • Port Hudson Operations Rouge 1570.1 X X

2625 Glen Plant lberville 600.45 X X

East Baton

2638 ExxonMobil Baton Rouge Refinery Rouge 6786.1 X X X X X X X X X X X X

3263 Taminco Higher Amines Inc Iberville 123.71 X X X X X X

Crosstex Processing Services LLC .

3302 Riverside Fractionation Ascension 60.96 X X X X X X

East Baton

3387 Novolyte Technologies Inc Rouge 27.36 X X X X

3400 OxyChem . Geismar Plant Ascension 149.72 X X X X X X

3492 Terminal Iberville 582.11 X X X X X X

ExxonMobil Chemical Co • Baton Rouge East Balon

3519 Polyolefins Plant Rouge 253.61 X X X X X

PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer LP • Geismar not economically

3732 Agricultural Nitrogen & Phosphate Plant Ascension 78.1 X feasible

Kb. further VOC

Genesis Crude Oil LP • Truck Loading East Baton controlsare not

3991 Facility Rouge 40.01 X economically

West

Baton

4174 Sid Richardson Carbon & Energy Co Rouge 100.86 X X

Southern Natural Gas Co - While Castle

4197 Compressor Station lberville 87.79 X X X

Enterprise Gas Processing LLC - Tebone

4762 Fractionation Plant Ascension 112.2 X X X X X

4803 BF! - Colonial Landfill Ascension 26.69 X X

TOTAL Petrochemicals USA Inc5176 Carville Polystyrene Plant Iberville 44.73 X X X X X

5565 Plant Ascension 314.32 X X X X

7359 White Castle Compressor Station Iberville 45.53 X X

Florida Gas Transmission Co - zachary East Baton

8007 Compressor Station #8 Rouge 100.41 X X X

8056 Plaquemine Point Shipyard Iberville 39.69 X X X X

8072 Bayou Bouillon Facility Iberville 118.75 X X X X X X X .'

9154 Shaw Sunland Fabricators Inc Livingston 75.11 X X X

West VOC controls are

Baton not economically

9495 BASF Corp - Port Allen Works Rouge 149.01 X feasible

West

Specialty Application Services Inc - Port Baton

11059 Allen Facilily Rouge 80.63 X X X

Chevron Pipe Line Co - Sorrento

11416 ....L.Underground Gas Storage Facility Ascension 60.18 X X X X
A:g~'lcy '" C!>IIlP_a~¥f,l;lme .

.

PARISH VOC LAC:33.1II.21

i.liie~j .... < • TPV 21,03 2104 2107 2iUB 2109 2111 2113 2115 211. 2121 2122 2123. 2125 2127 2129 21:n .2132 2133 2135 2137 2139 2141 2143 2147 2149 2151 2153 other

Flowers Baking Co of Baton Rouge LLC . East Baton

11595 Baton Rouge Facility Rouge 237.33 X X

Woodside Sanitary Landfill & Recycling

11767 Center Livingston 34.27 X X

West

ExxonMobil Production Corp - Baton Baton

17161 Rouge Gas Plant Rouge 32.02 X X X X X X X

17383 Crosstex LtG LLC - Myrtie Grove Station Iberville 39.24 X X X

17771 T T Barge Cleaning Mile 183 Inc Ascension 31.5 X X X

19184 Gas Plant lberville 54.08 X X X X X

West VOC controls are

Petroleum Fuel & Terminal Co - Port Baton not economically

19338 Allen Terminal Rouge 25.01 X feasible

19875 Products Livingston 395.13 X X

WWWW. further

VOC controls are

EDO Specialty Plastics - Perkins Road East Baton not economically

22750 Facility Rouge 60.33 X feasible

East Baton

25383 Lamar Graphics Rouge 26.66 X X

West

Baton

26217 Tumer Industries Group LLC Rouge 96 X X

26272 Terminal Ascension 32.79 X X X

East Baton

27559 Bayou Coaling LLC Rouge 70.32 X X

27834 Storage Facility Ascension 30.34 X X

Oxbow Calcining LLC - Baton Rouge East Baton

29884 Calcined Coke Plant Rouge 25.37 X X

AAAA, further vac controls are not

East Baton economically

31128 East Baton Rouge Parish North Landfill Rouge 28.1 X feasible

Air Liquide Large Industries US LP - not economically

31513 Geismar Ascension 35.9 X feasible

32133 Bayou. Sorrel Commingling Facility Iberville 32.55 X X X X

32135 White CasUe Field Production Facility Iberville 45.81 X X X

32145 Facility Iberville 42.78 X X X

32160 Bayou Bleu Field Production Facility lberville 118.75 X X X X X X X

32465 LVG WXl RA SU LB Facility Livingston 118.75 X X X X X X X

32466 Erva S Mayers # 1 Livingston 36.27 X X

33667 Paint Yard lberville 39.28 X X X

:3!l633 Command Services Inc Iberville 66.42 X X

39976 GabrielLLC lberville 99.25 X X X X X

40037 State Lease 14371 Production Facility lberville 142.5 X X X X X X X

West

Enterprise Products Operating LLC - Baton

40198 Baton Rouge Act FraclPCU Rouge 73.12 X X X X

Enterprise Products Operating Co LLp·

41417 Dome Storage Facility Ascension 167.79 X X X
Agency .~tl!1ij:l""yName 'PARISH voe LAC:33.1II.21

In't~reiit TPY 2103 2104 2101 2108 2109 2111 2113 2115 2116 .2121 2122 2123 2125 2127 2129 2131 21~2 .2133 2135 2131 2139 2141 '2143 2141 2149 2151 2153 Other

West

Baton

43634 Trinity Marine Products Inc - Plant #48 Rouge 219.67 X X X

51854 Center IberviUe 152.92 X X

80537 Environmental Products Livingston 84.19 X X

West

Baton

83425 Shintech Louisiana LLC - Addis Plant A Rouge 71.57 X X X

LDH Energy Refinery Services LLC -

83718 Geismar Fractionation Plant Ascension 60.48 X X X X

85393 Bayou Henry Central Facility Iberville 142.5 X X X X X X X

Dow Chemical Co (The) - Plaquemine not economically

85652 Cogeneration Plant IberviUe 48.16 X feasible

East Baton

88139 Port Hudson Central Tank Battery Rouge 35.36 X X X

89237 Americas LLC Iberville 69.02 X X X X X X X

89512 Facility Iberville 118.75 X X X X X X X

Hexion Specialty Chemicals Inc -

92534 Formaldehyde Plants 4&5 Ascension 145.11 X X X X X

East Baton

95859 University Field Production FaciHty Rouge 142.5 X X X X X X X

99129 United Lands #1 Facility Ascension 142.5 X X X X X X X

11331 Destec Ventures Facility lberville 47.5 X X X X X X X

115181 Weyerhaeuser #2 Production Facility Livingston 118.75 X X X X X X X

East Baton

119007 Duplantier Tank Battery - University Field "Rouge 142.5 X X X X X X X

East Baton

119008 Nelson Tank Battery - University Field Rouge 142.5 X X X X X X X

123784 Wilbert E-1 Wellsite Iberville 118.75 X X X X X X X

123785 Wilbert B-3 Well Site Iberville 118.75 X X X X X X X

Pennington #1 Tank Battery - SN 229775 East Baton

125816 Port Hudson Field Rouge 51.05 X X X X

126578 PVC Plant lberville 123.57 X X X X X X X

126748 Lake Field lberville 142.5 X X X X X X X

126750 Frog Lake Field lberville 118.75 X X X X X X X

VOC controls are

North Burtville Field Facility - North East Baton not economically

138716 Burtville Field Rouge 27.11 X , feasible

138856 St Gabriel Dehydration & NGL Facility #1. Iberville 48.37 X X X

Crown Paper #1 Production Facility- East Baton

144826 Profit Island Field Rouge 34.88 X X X

147113 Logistics Center Ascension 45.17 X X X X

East Baton

152236 Hoffman Heirs #1 - Sardine Point Field Rouge 32.65 X X X

Air Products & Chemicals Inc - Baton

Rouge Hydrogen Plant- Steam Methane East Baton

154867 Reforming Facility Rouge 28.08 X X X

A Wilberts Son et al #1 Production

156867 Facility - White CasUe Field lberville 38.24 X X
Other