alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Floyd, Appellant, *v.*Kulp Lumber Company.

*Ejectment*— Tax *title*— Seated *and unseated lands*— Question *for jury.*

In an action of ejectment where the defendant relies on a tax sale of the lands as unseated lands in a particular year, and the plaintiffs claim that the lands were assessed on the seated list as well, and therefore exempt from sale as unseated lands, and the defendant claims that the lands on the seated list, although of the same acreage, and in the name of the same owner, were different lands, the disputed question is for the jury, and a verdict and judgment for the defendant will be sustained in the absence of any error as to rulings on evidence or instructions to the jury.

Argued April 18, 1910.

Appeal, No. 155, Jan. T., 1909, by plaintiffs, from judgment of C. P. Huntingdon *278Co., May T.,,1907, No. 11, on verdict for defendant in case of J. B. Floyd et al. v. Kulp Lumber Company.

May 16, 1910:

Before Brown, Mestrezat, Potter, Stewart and Moschzisker, JJ.

Affirmed.

Ejectment for lands in Jackson township. Before Shull, P. J., specially presiding.

The facts appear by the former report of the case in 222 Pa. 257, and in the opinion of the Supreme Court, infra.

Verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiffs appealed.

*Errors assigned*were various rulings on evidence and instructions.

*James S. Woods,*with him *W. H. Woods',*for appellants.

*W. M. Henderson,*with him *A. Reed Hayes,*for appellee.

Per Curiam,

On the first trial of this case a verdict was directed for the plaintiffs. The judgment on it was reversed because we held that it was a question for the jury whether the property claimed by the defendant under a tax sale of it as unseated land was the same tract that was assessed the same year as seated land. If it was on the seated list, it was exempt from sale as unseated land: Floyd v. Kulp Lumber Co., 222 Pa. 257. On the second trial nothing was developed that changed the situation, and the case was submitted under instructions and answers to points which were free from error. The same is true of the rulings on offers of evidence. There is nothing in the assignments calling for any discussion, and the jury having found that the tax sale of the property as unseated land passed a good title under which the defendant holds, the judgment on the verdict is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 158 (Friday, August 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21632]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CO-010-07-1020-00-241A]


Northwest Colorado Resource Advisory Council Meetings

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The next meetings of the Northwest Colorado Resource Advisory 
Council will be held on Tuesday, September 9, 1997, in Grand Junction, 
Colorado; and Friday, November 7, 1997, in Eagle, Colorado.

DATES: Meetings are scheduled for Tuesday, September 9, 1997, and 
Friday, November 7, 1997.

ADDRESSES: For further information, contact Joann Graham, Bureau of 
Land Management (BLM), Grand Junction District Office, 2815 H Road, 
Grand Junction, Colorado 81506; Telephone (970) 244-3037.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Tuesday, September 9, 1997. A business 
meeting will be held from 6 a.m. to 8 a.m. in the Grand Junction 
District Office conference room, 2815 H Road, Grand Junction, Colorado. 
Agenda topics include draft 3809 mining regulations update, sanctioned 
subcommittee reports, and wilderness review update. The business 
meeting will be followed by a raft trip down the Colorado River through 
Ruby Canyon.
    Friday, November 7, 1997. This meeting will be held in Eagle, 
Colorado. The meeting time, location, and agenda will be posted at a 
later time.
    All resource advisory council meetings are open to the public. 
Interested persons may make oral statements at the meetings or submit 
written statements following the meetings. Per-person time limits for 
oral statements may be set to allow all interested persons an 
opportunity to speak.
    Summary minutes of council meetings are maintained in both the 
Grand Junction and Craig District Offices. They are available for 
public inspection and reproduction during regular business hours within 
thirty (30) days following the meeting.

    Dated: August 5, 1997.
Richard Arcand,
Grand Junction Associate District Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-21632 Filed 8-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 158 (Friday, August 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21591]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed During the Week of August 
8, 1997

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C 412 and 414. Answers 
may be filed within 21 days of date of filing.

Docket Number: OST-97-2780
Date Filed: August 4, 1997
Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association
Subject: COMP Telex Mail Vote 886, Fares from South Africa, Intended 
effective date: September 1, 1997

Docket Number: OST-97-2781
Date Filed: August 4, 1997
Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association
Subject: PTC12 Telex Mail Vote 885, Reso 010w--Seasonal Periods for, 
South Atlantic-Europe/Mideast fares, TW684--Amendment to Mail Vote, 
TW686--Amendment to Mail Vote, Intended effective date: September 1, 
1997

Docket Number: OST-97-2782
Date Filed: August 4, 1997
Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association
Subject: PTC12 USA-EUR 0031 dated July 14, 1997, USA-Austria/Belgium/
Germany/Netherlands/Scandinavia/Switzerland Resolutions, Minutes--PTC12 
USA-EUR 0032 dated July 18, 1997, r-1, 005k r-8--090nn, r-14--077oo, r-
20-077yy, r-2--001a, r-9--210ss, r-15--088dd, r-21--078pp, r-3--002, r-
10--072cc, r-16--092x, r-22--078uu, r-4--006ss, r-11--073a, r-17--
071ss, r-23--078ww, r-5--044vv, r-12--073dd, r-18--072zz, r-24--092aa, 
r-6--054vv, r-13--075bb, r-19--075ee, r-7--064vv,
Intended effective date: October 1, 1997
Paulette V. Twine,
Chief, Documentary Services.
[FR Doc. 97-21591 Filed 8-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Theundersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

 
| (1)    | The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year  ended May 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| (2)    | The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations  of the Company.                                                         |

 

 

Date: September 27,2005

 

 
|   |                       |                               |
|--------|-----------------------|------------------------------------|
|   |                  | , Chief Executive Officer          |
|   | Frederick M. Green    |
|   |                  |
|   |                       |                               |
|   |                  | , Interim Chief Financial  Officer |
|   | William J. Birmingham |

 

1

----
----

----

| 1.  | The      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934, as amended; and |
|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.    | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the LP. |
|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August      9, 2010                                                                               |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                         |   |   |
| /s/      Anthony J. Branca                                                                                   |   |   |
| Anthony      J. Branca                                                                                       |   |   |
| Chief      Financial OfficerICON      Capital Corp.General      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight BL.P. |
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 4226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2151]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-29, RM-8921]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Grass Valley, CA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition for rule making 
filed on behalf of Knight Monument Broadcasting requesting the 
allotment of Channel 277A to Grass Valley, California, as that 
community's third local FM service. Coordinates used for Channel 277A 
at Grass Valley are 39-12-31 and 120-59-02.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before March 17, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before April 1, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 
20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties 
should serve the petitioner's counsel, as follows: Henry E. Crawford, 
Esq., Law Offices of Henry E. Crawford, 1150 Connecticut Avenue, NW., 
Suite 900, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-29, adopted January 
17, 1997, and released January 24, 1997. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M 
Street, NW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may 
also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, 
Washington, D.C. 20037, (202) 857-3800.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
See 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-2151 Filed 1-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
UNITED
      STATES


SECURITIES
      AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington,
      D.C. 20549








FORM
      8-K





CURRENT
      REPORT





Pursuant
      to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934








Date
                of Report (date of earliest event reported):
            August
                2, 2006








TERABEAM,
                INC.(Exact
                name of registrant as specified in its
                charter)








Delaware
            000-29053
            04-2751645(State
                or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
            (Commission
                file number)
            (IRS
                employer identification no.)








2115
                O’Nel Drive, San Jose, CA
            95131(Address
                of principal executive offices)
            (Zip
                code)








Registrant’s
                telephone number, including area code:
            (408)
                731-2700








Not
                Applicable(Former
                name or former address, if changed since last
                report)










Check
      the
      appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
      satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
      provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):




o  Written
      communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
      230.425)




o  Soliciting
      material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
      240.14a-12)




o  Pre-commencement
      communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
      240.14d-2(b))




o  Pre-commencement
      communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
      240.13e-4(c))







Item
      2.02 Results
      of Operations and Financial Condition .





On
      August
      2, 2006, Terabeam, Inc. issued a press release announcing financial results
      for
      its second quarter ended June 30, 2006. A copy of that press release is attached
      hereto as Exhibit 99.1.








Item
      9.01 Financial
      Statements and Exhibits .





(c)
            Exhibits





See
      Exhibit Index.





SIGNATURE





Pursuant
      to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
      has
      duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
      duly authorized.





TERABEAM,
                INC.Dated:
                August 2, 2006
            By:
            /s/
                David L. RenauldDavid
                L. RenauldVice
                President





EXHIBIT
      INDEX








Number
            Title99.1
            Press
                release dated August 2, 2006.







2
#### NEW MAGNOLIA BAPTIST CHURCH, INC. OF BRANFORD, Appellant, v. Frank ELLERKER, Cynthia Ellerker, and Elsie Birch, Appellees.

No. EE-266.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 21, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 12, 1978.

*205William R. Slaughter, II of Slaughter & Slaughter, Live Oak, for appellant.

John F. Roscow, III of Scruggs, Carmichael, Long, Tomlinson, Roscow, Pridgeon, Helpling & Young, Gainesville, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

This case involves a dispute between two factions of a congregational, as distinguished from a hierarchical church. (See *Baldwin v. Mills,*344 So.2d 259 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) and cases therein cited) Although civil courts may not constitutionally delve into matters of an ecclesiastic nature they have the right, indeed the duty, of applying and enforcing sterile principles of property law. *(Baldwin v. Mills,*supra).

The law is also well settled that it is the obligation of an appellate court to approve and affirm a final judgment of a trial court which achieves a correct result even though the basis or reasoning applied by the trial court is erroneous. *(Jones v. Dove,*300 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)).

Sub judice, we agree with appellant that the basis announced by the learned trial judge for the conclusion reached in the final judgment here appealed is incorrect; however, the result we find to be in accordance with the evidence and applicable law.

The resolution to incorporate approved by a majority of the congregation of the unincorporated church does not clearly reveal (does not prove by a preponderance of the evidence) an intent to authorize the trustees of the unincorporated church to convey the church property to the corporation which was belatedly formed. Accordingly, there is insufficient basis in the record to validate the conveyance by the church trustees (assuming arguendo that they enjoyed the status as trustees on the date they executed the purported deed, such status being in dispute but unnecessary for us to resolve) to the corporation, appellant here. Therefore, applying sterile principles of law, we conclude that the learned trial judge did not err in the result achieved by the final judgment here appealed.

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MILLS, JJ., concur.
May 22, 2015 

Mr. Andrew Saul 

Alabama 

Dear Mr. Andrew Saul: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your April 28, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-1194), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
Amendment to Promissory Note



 Exhibit 10.41 
 AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE 
 The parties hereby agree to amend certain repayment provisions
set forth in the Promissory Note between Richard Nanula and Amgen Inc., executed by Richard Nanula on or about June 27, 2001, as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Paragraph 1 of the Promissory Note, Staff Member shall pay the
total amount of Principal and the remaining interest due (compounded at the rate of 5% per annum on June 27, 2008, June 27, 2009, and on the date of final repayment), in a lump sum on or before June 27, 2010. 
  

					
			
	Date: September 4, 2007	 		 	/s/ Richard D. Nanula
		 		 	Richard D. Nanula
			
	Date: August 30, 2007	 		 	/s/ Charles V. “Chip” Bell
		 		 	for Amgen Inc.
**Exhibit 10.14**

 

**MCI, Inc.**

**Board of Directors**

 

**Amendment to the MCI,Inc. 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan**

 

WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 9.01 of the MCI, Inc. 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”), the Board of Directors of MCI, Inc. has the power to amend the Plan; and 

 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to amend the Plan to clarify certain provisions of the Plan; 

 

NOW THEREFORE BE IT, 

 

RESOLVED, that the Plan is amended in accordance with the Exhibit A attachedhereto, effective as of June 25, 2004; and 

 

FURTHER RESOLVED,that the appropriate officers of the Company be, and each of them hereby is, authorized to execute any amendment, document, certificate or other instrument and to do all such acts and things as they or counsel for the Company may deem necessary oradvisable to carry out the purposes of the foregoing resolutions; and 

 

FURTHER RESOLVED, that the appropriate officers of the Company be, and each of them hereby is, authorized to execute any amendments to (1) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 previously filed by the Company registering shares on behalfthe Plan; and (2) any Plan prospectus. 

**Exhibit A**

 

**SECOND AMENDMENT**

**TO THE**

**MCI, INC. 2003 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN**

 

Pursuant to the power reserved to it in Section 9.01 of the MCI, Inc. 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the“**Plan**”), the Board of Directors of MCI, Inc. hereby amends the Plan as follows: 

 

**Section 4.06, “Source of Shares” is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:**

 

Shares offered under the Stock Purchase Plan may be (i) authorized and issued Shares purchased in open market transactions by a Broker pursuant todirections from the Committee and at the market price prevailing on the applicable exchange or (ii) treasury Shares. 

 

* * * 

 

This amendment is hereby adopted effective this      day of                     , 2004. 

 
MCI, INC.By: 
 
Title:
EX-32




**CERTIFICATION
      OF**


**PRINCIPAL
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the "Report")
      of
      MULTI SOLUTIONS, INC. (the "Company") for the year ended January 31, 2007,
      I,
      Jerome Goubeaux, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
      that:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Jerome Goubeaux
            
            
            August 21, 2007Jerome
                Goubeaux,
              Chief
                Executive Officer and Director