alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WaterSense®

What is WaterSense? 

WaterSense is a partnership program sponsored by 

the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Its 

mission is to protect the future of our nation’s water 

supply by promoting and enhancing the market for 

water-efficient products and services. 

What does WaterSense do? 

WaterSense is the symbol for water-efficient 

products, services, and practices. By setting performance and water use specifications, WaterSense 

helps consumers identify products that meet EPA 

criteria for efficiency and performance. The 

WaterSense label appears on high-efficiency toilets 

that use 20 percent less water than standard models. EPA is also partnering with landscape irrigation 

professionals certified by WaterSense labeled programs focusing on water efficiency. In the future, 

EPA will consider additional indoor and outdoor 

home products, as well as commercial products. 

Why promote water efficiency? 

Although water shortages have typically been a 

concern in the Western United States, today concerns about water are spreading across the country. 

Water managers in at least 36 states now expect 

local or regional water shortages to occur over the 

next several years. Wasting less water in our homes 

and yards also saves money and improves the quality of our water sources nationwide. When we use 

less water in our homes and daily lives, we all win. 

How can I get involved? 

Saving water is easy—many products are already 

available for use, and it doesn’t require changing 

the way most of us live or do business. By choosing products with the WaterSense label, you know 

you’ll be saving water for future generations. 

● Consumers can reduce their water bills by 

as much as 30 percent by making a few simple 

purchasing decisions. 

● Manufacturers can differentiate themselves 

in the marketplace by offering water-efficient 

products that perform as well as or better 

than conventional models. 

● Businesses can help increase the marketability of the water-efficient products they 

sell or improve their bottom line by saving 

water in their operations. 

● Most importantly, the environment benefits 

from a few simple actions that we all can take. 

Start saving! 

Look for products with the 

WaterSense label for your bathroom and lawn, use a WaterSense 

irrigation partner for your landscape watering system, and visit 

<www.epa.gov/watersense> to 

find easy practices you can undertake at home to 

reduce your water bill and environmental impact! 

Every Drop Counts! 

EPA-832-F-06-008 

(866) WTR-SENS (987-7367) · www.epa.gov/watersense · watersense@epa.gov 

July 2007 Recycled/Recyclable—Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper.
!(

!(22

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000

Feet /

Tile: C1

Jul 24, 2008 Blue Ridge Reservoir

Land Management Plan

\\alismurphy\home\mprlm\projects\landplan\Maps\Blue Ridge_land_plan\BlueRidge_land_plan WEB.mxd
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 987-988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-214]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-199-000]

Shell Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff
December 31, 1996.
    Take notice that on December 23, 1996, Shell Gas Pipeline Company 
(SGPC) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets set forth on Appendix A to the filing, 
to become effective January 1, 1997.
    SGPC states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with Order 
Nos. 582

[[Page 988]]

and 582-A, issued September 28, 1995 in Docket No. RM95-3, in which the 
Commission revised, reorganized and updated its regulations governing 
the form composition, and filing of rates and tariffs for interstate 
pipeline companies.
    Specifically SGPC indicates the tendered tariff sheets revise its 
tariff to:
    (1) Update Title page in accordance with 154.102(d) to include a 
mailing address, telephone number and facsimile number. SGPC is also 
updating its area code from 713 to 281 (as required by the Texas Public 
Utility Commission) on this and other applicable sheets;
    (2) expand the table of contents to include the sections of the 
general terms and conditions in accordance with section 154.104;
    (3) add a statement for SGPC's discount policy in accordance with 
section 154.109(c);
    (4) delete the index of customers from the tariff in accordance 
with section 154.111(a);
    (5) update references throughout the tariff to the updated sections 
of the Commission's Regulations that have been changed;
    (6) add a statement to SGPC's general terms and conditions for 
periodic reports in accordance with section 154.502; and
    (7) change the rates to reflect a thermal unit in accordance with 
section 154.107(b).
    SGPC submits that the Commission should grant it all waivers 
necessary to place these provisions into effect January 1, 1997.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with 18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions and protests must 
be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-214 Filed 1-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 55656.

#### Gilchrist Co. *v.*United States,

protest 648393-G (Boston).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
#### Ivy LOVE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1209.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 6, 1978.

Rehearing Denied July 14, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Kurt Marmar, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Steven R. Jacob, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY and NATHAN, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment of conviction based upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of involuntary sexual battery by threats of violence likely to cause serious injury.

It is appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in overruling his objections to the admission of testimony of collateral crimes and denying his motion for a mistrial.

We have carefully considered appellant’s contentions in the light of the record on appeal, and briefs and have concluded that reversible error has not been shown. *Williams v. State,*110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959); *Rodriguez v. State,*327 So.2d 903 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), and *Coppolino v. State,*223 So.2d 68 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968).

Therefore the judgment and sentence are affirmed.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

The State of Texas, Appellant

No. 06-13-00115-CR v.

Jorge Louis Verde, Appellee

Appeal from the 336th District Court of 

Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR-11-

23985). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Morriss, Justice Carter and Justice Moseley

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, The State of Texas, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED APRIL 23, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21309]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP94-325-006]


Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company; Notice of Refund Report

August 7, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 4, 1997, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line 
Company (Panhandle) tendered for filing its Refund Report in accordance 
with Article I, Section 2 of the Stipulation and Agreement (Settlement) 
dated March 24, 1997.
    Panhandle states that this Settlement resolves all remaining Gas 
Supply Realignment cost recovery issues with the Municipal Gas 
Commission of Missouri (MGCM).
    On July 3, 1997 Panhandle states that it distributed checks for the 
Settlement Refunds to all affected members of MGCM in accordance with 
Article I, Section 2 of the Settlement.
    Panhandle states that copies of this filing are being served on all 
affected customers, applicable state regulatory agencies and all 
parties to these proceedings.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before August 14, 1997. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of the 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21309 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT
31.2





Certification





I,
Stephen W. Dederick, certify that:





1.          
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Hometown Bancorp,
Inc.;





2.          
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.          
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4.          
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:





(a)        
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)        
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)        
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.          
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)        
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b)        
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:
March 31, 2008





/s/StephenW.DederickStephen W. DederickChief
      Financial Officer and Vice President
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0673 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-091-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here Work-hours

(include

access, testing,

and close-up) Labor

cost

(@$85/h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 20.5 $1,742.5

0 $1,742.50 494 $860,795.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $860,795



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work-hours

(include access,

testing, and closeup) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

not available $ 0.00 

### $0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO

*Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES* NO

*Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a s ubstantial number of small entities? Explain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO



### * Explanation 

### :
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hartmarx Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Homi B. Patel, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 9, 2007



|                  |  |                                                
|----------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|/s/ HOMI B. PATEL
|Name:             |  | Homi B. Patel                                  
|Title:            |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of
Ironstone Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof  (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on
the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
his knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.





Date:           April 14,
2010                                                                    /s/  Quock Q.
Fong


Name:  Quock Q.
Fong


Title:  Chief
Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Ironstone Group, Inc. and will be retained
by Ironstone Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and  Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
ex10-4.htm


    EXHIBIT
      10.4

     

    NS8
      CORPORATION

    


    AMENDMENT
      NO. 1

    TO
      SECURED CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE

     NO.
      002

    


    


    THIS
      DEBENTURE AMENDMENT SHOULD BE ATTACHED TO THE

    ORIGINAL
      DEBENTURE

    


     

    This
      Amendment No. 1 to Debenture (this “Amendment”) is issued in connection with
      that certain Secured Convertible Debenture No. 002 (the “Debenture”) issued by
      NS8 Corporation, (the “Company”) to Cornell
      Capital Partners, L.P. (the “Holder”), on June 25, 2004 in the
      original principal amount of $750,000.

    


    THIS
      CERTIFIES THAT, the following amendments are hereby made to the
      Debenture:

     

    
      	
              1.  

            	
              The
                due date of the Debenture as stated in Section 1.01 shall hereinafter
                be
                extended from June 25, 2007 to July 19,
                2008.

            


    

     

    
      	
              2.  

            	
              The
                interest rate as set forth in Section 1.01 shall be increased from
                five
                percent (5%) to fourteen percent (14%) effective as of July 20,
                2007.

            


    

     

    


     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be signed by
      its duly authorized officer.

     

    NS8
      CORPORATION

    


    


    


    
      	
               

            	
               

            	
               

            
	
              Date: July
                20, 2007

            	
              By:  

            	
              /s/ George
                G.
                O’Leary                    
                

            
	
               

            	
              George
                G. O’Leary

            
	
               

            	
              Chief
                Financial Officer

              (Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43382-43383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21355]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request for Review of a 
Revised Information Collection: Federal Employees Health Benefits 
(FEHB) Annuitant Express Open Season Interactive Voice Response System 
(IVR)

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget a request for review of a revised information collection. 
FEHB Annuitant Express Open Season IVR is used by retirees and 
survivors to collect information for changing FEHB enrollments, 
requesting plan brochures, requesting a change of address, requesting 
cancellation or suspension of FEHB benefits, requesting payment 
directly to OPM where the FEHB payment is greater than the monthly 
annuity amount, or requesting a copy of the FEHB Customer Satisfaction 
Survey results. We are replacing the OPM 2809 EZ1 and OPM 2809 EZ2 with 
the IVR technology to improve our response time to our customers.
    We estimate 109,600 requests will be completed annually. Each 
request takes approximately 10 minutes to complete. The annual 
estimated burden is 18,167 hours. For copies of this proposal, contact 
Jim Farron on (202) 418-3208, or E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc96919a9d8e8e9392bc938c91d29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6f0502090e1d1d00012f001f0241080019">[email protected]</span></a>

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received on or before 
September 12, 1997.


[[Page 43383]]


ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--

Lorraine E. Dettman, Chief, Operations Support Division, Retirement and 
Insurance Service, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, 
NW, Room 3349, Washington, DC 20415
    and
Joseph Lackey, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office 
Building, NW, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION CONTACT:
Mary Beth Smith-Toomey, Management Services Division, (202) 606-0623.

Office of Personnel Management.
James B. King,
Director.
[FR Doc. 97-21355 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>