alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1206 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1206

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4960 West Washington Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the 
                 ``Ray Charles Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 9, 2005

 Mrs. Feinstein (for herself and Mrs. Boxer) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4960 West Washington Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the 
                 ``Ray Charles Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4960 
West Washington Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Ray Charles Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ray Charles Post Office 
Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
      10.7

    Loan
      Agreement

    (English
      Translation) 

    


    Lender:
      Daykeen Group Limited

    Borrower:
      Top Time International Limited

    


    In
      connection with loans, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

    


    1. The
      Borrower need to pay $54.82 million transfer price to buy 90% of the shares
      of
      Chongqing JiuZhou Dismutase Biology Technology Co., LTD. 

    2. The
      Lender agrees to loan $54.82 million to the Borrower.

    3. The
      Lender can pay the above-mentioned amount directly to the transferor of the
      shares of Chongqing JiuZhou Dismutase Biology Technology Co., LTD. 

    4. The
      loan
      period is no longer than three months.

    


    The
      Lender: Daykeen Group Limited

    The
      Borrower: Top Time International Limited 

    


    Date:
      December 22, 2006
Exhibit 32.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18
U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Jagged Peak, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 24, 2010, (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                       |  |                              
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 5, 2010
|                       | 
|By:                    |  | /s/Andrew J. Norstrud        
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                       |  | (Principle Financial Officer)
#### A. G. SPANOS and Dean A. Spanos, Appellants, v. U. S. HOME MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 77-613.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 23, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 16, 1977.

R. Timothy Peters, of Goza, Hall, Peacock & Peters, P.A., Clearwater, for appellants.

Harold Bowman, Clearwater, for appel-lee.

GRIMES, Acting Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment against a claim for the anticipatory breach of a lease on the ground that regardless of whether the lessee had breached the lease, the record showed that the lessors had not suffered any damages as a result.

In *Kanter v. Safran,*68 So.2d 553 (Fla. 1953), our supreme court approved the following measure of damages for the recovery for the anticipatory breach of a lease:

> “ . . . [W]hen a lessee repudiates his contract, a cause of action immediately arises in favor of the lessor for full damages, present and prospective, which were the necessary and direct result of the breach, the measure of which is the difference (reduced to present worth) between the rent fixed in the lease and the present fair rental value of the premises for the remainder of the term, together with such special damages as may have resulted from the breach. This is simply an application to lease contracts of the doctrine of ‘anticipatory breach’ in general contract law . .

The basis for the summary judgment entered in this case was that one of the lessors admitted in his deposition that the rental specified under the subject lease was lower than the present rental value for comparable premises and lower than the rental being charged by the lessors for most other offices in the same building. However, we think the court overlooked some equally significant testimony by the same witness who pointed out that the leased premises had been constructed to meet the exact requirements of the lessee and that there was very little likelihood of finding another tenant who would lease the space without substantial alterations having to be made. He explained that if it is necessary to specially design the office space to meet a lessee’s requirements, the extra expenses would have to be recouped during the term of the lease by increasing the amount of the rental payments.

The present state of the record does not conclusively show that the lessors will be *161unable to prove any damages. Therefore, the movant failed to carry its burden of demonstrating that no material issues remain for trial. *Visingardi*v. *Tirone,*193 So.2d 601 (Fla.1966); *Smith v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc.,*297 So.2d 841 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974).

REVERSED.

SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.
**SEP**
               MAY
				Jun12
				Next capture**2007**
               2009
				2010**12 captures**
           22 Apr 05 - 12 May 09
   Close
       Help


**Dodge County**

Home

Return to Maps Page

County Map in PDF format

Click the name of the Waterfowl Production Area 
  below to see its map.



Aerial 
    Map  Topo 
    Map  3D 
    Map


Aerial 
    Map  Topo 
    Map  3D 
    Map


Aerial 
    Map  Topo 
    Map  3D 
    Map






>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                    APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              1,650,801
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           5,078
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                           592,125
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    2,300,994
<PP&E>                                                456,791
<DEPRECIATION>                                        255,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      2,524,525
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 283,232
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                59
<COMMON>                                              191,998
<OTHER-SE>                                          2,049,236
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        2,524,525
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        6,497
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           3,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    2,013,282
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (1,960,700)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (1,960,700)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (2,089,756)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.11)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Jeff
      Criswell, President of Cyberads, Inc. (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





This
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,
      2006,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"), fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      August 21, 2006




/s/
      JEFF CRISWELL


Jeff
      Criswell


President
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-95,617-01 & WR-95,617-02

EX PARTE ADAM SANCHEZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 2017CR9179-W1 & 2017CR9174-W1 

IN THE 226TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM BEXAR COUNTY

Per curiam. YEARY, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which KELLER, P.J., joined.

O P I N I O N

Under a plea agreement, Applicant was convicted of two aggravated sexual assault of a child

offenses involving his biological son and daughter. He was sentenced to twenty-five years’

imprisonment in each case, to run concurrently. He did not appeal his convictions. Applicant filed

these applications for writs of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk

forwarded them to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that (1) he is actually innocent because the complainants have recanted

and (2) his pleas were involuntary due to the ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court

conducted a live evidentiary hearing, at which the complainants testified. The trial court found the
2

complainants’ recantations credible and recommends that the Court grant Applicant relief on actual

innocence grounds. The record supports the trial court’s findings and recommendation.

Relief is granted. Ex parte Elizondo, 947 S.W.2d 202 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Ex parte

Tuley, 109 S.W.3d 388 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). The judgments in cause numbers 2017CR9179 and

2017CR9174 in the 226th District Court of Bexar County are set aside, and Applicant is remanded

to the custody of the Sheriff of Bexar County to answer the charges as set out in the indictments. 

The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within ten days from the date of this Court’s

mandate.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department ofCriminalJustice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: June 19, 2024

Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      11,377,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                129,479,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    357,949,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  4,646,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             515,550,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 423,683,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                39,057,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          5,698,000
<LONG-TERM>                                 10,250,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    300,000
<COMMON>                                       718,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,844,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             515,550,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             28,566,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            8,907,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             1,590,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            39,063,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          17,228,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          19,468,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       19,595,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                1,128,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             210,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             23,749,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,481,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   4,481,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,013,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.40
<LOANS-NON>                                  3,968,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   500,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               139,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              4,607,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             3,775,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  738,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   481,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            4,646,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         4,446,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        200,000
        

</TABLE>
October 2 4 , 2017



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals
DOMONIQUE GIBSON , Appellant

NO. 14

- 17

- 00797

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court bel ow. The record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries VI, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 6, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries VI, Inc.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00547-CR

Joseph Delmarco Carter

v.

The State of Texas

On appeal from the

19th District Court of McLennan County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2015-1015-C1

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified. 

The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 20, 2018
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 023

Attachment Name

CAS RN 1456803-12-5 Chemical Structure Identity and Low Risk Polymer Analysis

Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, 2e. (Chem 5)

Contains CBI

Report Number

 Sanitized Version
All CBI has been removed
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 160 (Tuesday, August 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21850]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

August 11, 1997.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF)

    OMB Number: 1512-0539.
    Form Number: None.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Statement of Process--Marking of Plastic Explosives for the 
Purpose of Detection.
    Description: The information contained in the statement of process 
is required to ensure compliance with the provisions of Public Law 104-
132. This information will be used to ensure that plastic explosives 
contain a detection agent as required by law.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 8.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 30 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: Quarterly.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 16 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Robert N. Hogarth (202) 927-8930, Bureau of 
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, Room 3200, 650 Massachusetts Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, DC 20226.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Dale A. Morgan,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-21850 Filed 8-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21483]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-437-000]


Williams Natural Gas Company and Missouri Gas Energy, A Division 
of Southern Union Company; Notice of Petition for Declaratory Order

August 8, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 1, 1997, pursuant to Rule 207 of the 
Rules and Practice and Procedure, Missouri Gas Energy, A Division of 
Southern Union Company (MGE) and Williams Natural Gas Company 
(Williams) filed a request for a Declaratory Order on the Right of 
First Refusal Mechanism.
    MGE and Williams (the Parties) seek a declaratory order to resolve 
issues in controversy related to the right of first refusal (ROFR) 
mechanism bidding process. The Parties request a determination by the 
Commission that the current capacity holder, in order to retain such 
capacity, must either: (i) Submit a bid identical, in terms of amount 
and type of service, to the capacity that is posted; or (ii) compete 
with third parties pursuant to a bidding structure that is based on the 
overall economic value of each particular bid received. The parties 
respectfully request that the Commission make a determination as to the 
proper balance between these competing interests.
    The parties states that they have served the foregoing document 
upon each person designated on the official service list compiled by 
the Secretary of the Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with 18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before September 2, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21483 Filed 8-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of SouthCrest Financial Group,
Inc.








This
31st
day of March, 2008.








/s/ Larry T. KuglarLarry
      T. KuglarChief
      Executive Officer