alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7109
BENJAMIN E. COX, Petitioner - Appellant, versusANTHONY HATHAWAY, III, Superintendent; FRANKLIN FREEMAN, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-952-5-H) Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 12, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benjamin E. Cox, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Coull Wilson, Associate Attorney General, Mark John Pletzke, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny acertificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Cox v. Hathaway , No. CA-95-952-5-H (E.D.N.C. July 11, 1996). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Hamelin, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
  1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   
|---
|(1)
|   
|(2)

|By: |  | /s/ PAULHAMELIN
    
    Paul HamelinPresident
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------

March 2, 2009



---
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

Certification of Treasurer



I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Big Sky Industries V, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: February 12, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer
122 STAT. 4778 PUBLIC LAW 110–421—OCT. 15, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6045: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Sept. 25, 26, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 30, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–421 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 

to extend the authorization of the Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant Program 

through fiscal year 2012. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bulletproof Vest Partnership 

Grant Act of 2008’’. 

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR 

BULLETPROOF VEST PARTNERSHIP GRANT PROGRAM. 

Section 1001(a)(23) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control 

and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3793(a)(23)) is amended 

by striking ‘‘2009’’ and inserting ‘‘2012’’. 

Approved October 15, 2008. 

42 USC 3711 

note. 

Bulletproof Vest 

Partnership 

Grant Act 

of 2008. 

Oct. 15, 2008 

[H.R. 6045] 


kgrant on POHRRP4G1 with PUBLAW
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 158 (Friday, August 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21612]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3428-000]

Tri-Valley Corporation; Notice of Issuance of Order

August 11, 1997.
    Tri-Valley Corporation (Tri-Valley) submitted for filing a rate 
schedule under which Tri-Valley will engage in wholesale electric power 
and energy transactions as a marketer. Tri-Valley also requested waiver 
of various Commission regulations. In particular, Tri-Valley requested 
that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by Tri-
Valley.
    On August 6, 1997, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Applications, Office of Electric Power Regulation, granted 
requests for blanket approval under part 34, subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Tri-Valley should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 
and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Tri-Valley is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Tri-Valley's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is September 5, 1997. Copies 
of the full text of the order are available from the Commission's 
Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21612 Filed 8-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
----

Form 10-KSB/A Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) 

I, Mingda Rong, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, asadopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based upona review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31,2007 of the Registrant (the "Report"): 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Registrant. 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by theRegistrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request. 

SIGNATURE

Date: June 20, 2008 

/s/Mingda Rong -------------------------- Mingda Rong Chief Financial Officer 

----
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                                                  --------------

                                  Certification

I, James A. Fine, Jr., certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Investors Title Company;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we
     have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     b) {Reserved}

     c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
     disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
     this report based on such evaluation; and

     d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2004

/s/ James A. Fine, Jr.
----------------------
James A. Fine, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Inconnection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of theReport of Cintas Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period endingMay 31, 2006 (the “Report”), I, William C. Gale, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of my knowledge:

(1)            TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)            Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ William C. Gale         |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| William C. Gale             |
| Principal Financial Officer |
|                        |
| August 11, 2006             |

 

1

----
No. 00-5758.

#### Broseh *v.*Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-152674, 333-152673, 333-92611 and 333-91208 of State Bancorp, Inc., on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-141722, 333-40424, 333-155356 and 333-156528 of State Bancorp, Inc., on Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-157108 on Form S-3D of our report dated March 12, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial        statements of State Bancorp, Inc. and to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of State Bancorp, Inc. appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of State Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

Crowe Horwath LLP

 

Livingston, New Jersey

March 12, 2010

 

----
PRIVATE LAW 106–10—NOV. 9, 2000

Private Law 106–10

106th Congress

An Act

For the relief of Sepandan Farnia and Farbod Farnia.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SEPANDAN FARNIA

AND FARBOD FARNIA.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of

section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Sepandan

Farnia and Farbod Farnia shall each be eligible for issuance of

an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien

lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such

Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.

(b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Sepandan Farnia or Farbod

Farnia enters the United States before the filing deadline specified

in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have entered and

remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for

adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigration and

Nationality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act.

(c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance

of an immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status

is filed with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of

the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.

Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent residence

to Sepandan Farnia and Farbod Farnia, the Secretary of State

shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by two, during the current

or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas

that are made available to natives of the country of the aliens’

birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act

or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are

Nov. 9, 2000

[H.R. 848]

PRIVATE LAW 106–10—NOV. 9, 2000

made available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under

section 202(e) of such Act.

Approved November 9, 2000.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report
of Central Jersey Bancorp (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I, James S. Vaccaro, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of ss.13(a) or 15(d) of
         the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. ss.78m or 78o(d), and,

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Dated: April 30, 2007                        /s/ James S. Vaccaro
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           James S. Vaccaro
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 23, 2021

Order 

Clerk

June 23, 2021

162785(72)(73)

COVENANT MEDICAL CENTER, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 162785

v COA: 342379

Bay CC: 16-003671-NF

EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY 

COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

MICHIGAN ASSIGNED CLAIMS PLAN, 

MICHIGAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE 

PLACEMENT FACILITY, and JOHN DOE 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants.

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellee to extend the time 

for filing its answer is GRANTED. The answer submitted on May 27, 2021, is accepted 

as timely filed. On further order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellant to 

extend the time for filing its reply is GRANTED. The reply will be accepted as timely 

filed if submitted on or before July 8, 2021.
#### Caleb F. Reynolds, Appellant, *vs.*John W. Rogers, Respondent.

1. *Agent, sale of stock by*— Amount, *agreement with principal as to*— Sale *for less sum*— Inability,—Where, by the terms of his agreement with his principal, an agent had authority to sell certain cattle if they brought a given sum, and they were sold for a less amount, the principal would, nevertheless, be entitled to the sum named in the stipulation.

2. *Supreme Court*— Evidence—Jury.—On questions of fact the Supreme Court will not invade the province of the jury.

*Appeal from Carroll Circuit Court.*

*John L. MiricJe,*for Appellant.

*L. H. Waters,*for Respondent.

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This action was brought to recover abalance of ^556^0 claimed to be due from the defendant to the plaintiff on account of money had and received, &c.

The answer was a denial; and for a further defense it was averred that defendant left cattle with the plaintiff to be sold at *18not less than $402® per head; and that they were reasonably worth that sum, and that they were sold at a greater sum, and that they were sold for more than the money paid and advanced to defendant.

There was a trial before a jury upon the simple issue of indebtedness, and the only witnesses were the plaintiff in his own behalf, and the defendant for himself. Verdict and judgment for defendant.

The only question involved is one of fact, and that was exclusively the province of the jury to find. The appellant makes a point upon the instructions, hut we cannot see that it is sustained by any substantial ground.

Two instructions were given for him as' favorable as he could ask, and the third instruction, which was refused, stated that there was no evidence in the case showing a liability of the plaintiff to the defendant for any stipulated price to he obtained for the cattle.

Eor the defendant the court instructed that the burden was upon the plaintiff to make out his ease by a preponderance of evidence ; and that if it was found that defendant, at the plaintiff’s request, and for a consideration, placed in his hands and to be sold, the cattle ; and that the same were to be sold by plaintiff so as to realize a certain price per head, and the plaintiff sold at a less price than that agreed upon, then the defendant was entitled to a credit, and to he allowed the price at and for which the cattle were to be sold.

We see nothing objectionable in the instructions. There was evidence to sustain them, and whether it was satisfactory was for the jury alone. The case presented simply a question of fact and we are unable to perceive any ruling on the law that prejudiced the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

All the judges concur except Judge Yories who is absent.
II 

★(Star Print)

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1339 

To reauthorize the Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design Program 

Act of 1994. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 30, 2005 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself, Mr. JEFFORDS, and Mr. CHAFEE) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and 

Design Program Act of 1994. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Junior Duck Stamp 

5 Reauthorization Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION. 

7 The Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design 

8 Program Act of 1994 (16 U.S.C. 719 et seq.) is amend9 ed— 
2 

S 1339 IS1S 

1 (1) by redesignating the first section 6 (16 

2 U.S.C. 719c), relating to authorization of appropria3 tions, as section 7 and moving the section so as to 

4 appear at the end of the Act; and 

5 (2) in section 7 (as redesignated by paragraph 

6 (1)) by striking ‘‘2001 through 2005’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘2006 through 2010’’. 

Æ
No. 45323.

#### Protests 995669-G, etc., of John A. Chard et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

On the record it was found that the cloth in question is waterproof and properly dutiable as claimed by the plaintiffs.
Mapping Customer Training

Email this event to me @

Invalid Email Address!Invalid Email Address!

Start Date/Time:

Monday, November 4, 2024 1:30 PM(UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

End Date/Time:

Monday, November 4, 2024 2:30 PM(UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

Recurring Event:

One time event

Importance:

Normal Priority

Category:

DLA Aviation Mapping

Description:

Enter event description

Enrolled Users:

                - Return
                - 
                - Export