alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.4


 


AMENDMENT TO


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This AMENDMENT, dated as of November 6, 2007,
between Answers Corporation, a Delaware Corporation (the “Company”) and Bruce Smith, an individual (“Executive”),
amends that Employment Agreement dated July 27th, 2005 (the “Employment Agreement”).


 


1.               Effective June
19, 2007, the Executive has been promoted to the position of Chief Strategic
Officer of the Company.


 


2.               Pursuant to
this Amendment, the parties agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:


Subsection 2.1, “Voluntary Termination By Either Party” of
the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with
the following:


 


2.1  Voluntary Termination By Either Party.  Either party may terminate the Executive’s employment
with the Company without cause at any time upon three (3) months written
notice. The Company shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to require
Executive to continue working for the Company during the notice period.  If the Company terminates the Executive without
cause pursuant to this Section 2.1 the Board of Directors shall take the
necessary steps so that the period during which the Executive shall be
permitted to exercise his stock options to purchase shares of common stock of
the Parent in accordance with the Parent’s employee stock option plan(s) as in
effect from time to time (the “Options”), shall be extended to the shorter of
(a) one (1) year from the effective date of his termination or (b) the
expiration date of the options.


 


3.               The effective
date of this Amendment shall be the date first written above.


 


4.               Terms used in
this Amendment but not defined herein will have the respective meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Employment Agreement.  In the event of any conflict between the
terms of this Amendment and the terms of the Employment Agreement, this
Amendment shall control.  Except as
modified by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.


	
  AGREED
  AND ACCEPTED:

  	
   

  	
  AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Bruce Smith

  	
   

  	
  GuruNet Israel Ltd.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Signature: 

  	
  /s/ Bruce D. Smith

  	
   

  	
  Signature: 

  	
  /s/
  Steven Steinberg

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name: Steven Steinberg

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title: Chief Financial Officer
Opinion filed March 10 , 2011



## In The



# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________



### No. 11

- 10

- 00091

- C V

__________

GILBERT ARSIAGA , SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE, AND

BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP

V.

VALENTE MENDES

On Appeal from the 1 61st District Court

Ector County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. B

- 129,159

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellants, Gilbert Arsiaga, Substitute Trustee, and BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP,

and a ppellee, Vale nte Mendes, have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)( 2 ). In t he motion, the parties state that they “have now reached an

agreement to settle and compromise their differences in this appeal. Specifically, the parti es

have agreed to bound [sic] by the Amended Temporary Orders entered by the trial court on

June 7, 2010, thereby disposing of the arguments made the basis of this appeal.” The parties

further request the court to render judgment effectuating the parties ’ agreement pursuant to2

Rule 42.1( a)(2)(A) by affirming the Amended Temporary Orders entered by the trial court on

June 7, 2010, and remand ing this case to the trial court for further proceedings.

Therefore, in accordance with the parties’ request, we aff irm the Amended Temporary

Orders entered by the trial court on June 7, 2010, and remand this case to the trial court for

further proceedings.

The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

March 10 , 2011

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                      SUBSIDIARIES OF IRONSTONE GROUP, INC.

AcadiEnergy, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a 100%-owned subsidiary of the
Company.

Belt Perry Associates, Inc., an Arizona corporation, ("BPA") is a 100%-owned
subsidiary of the Company.

Belt Perry Associates, Inc., a California corporation, is 83.33% owned by BPA
and 16.67% owned by the Company.

DeMoss Corporation, a California corporation, is a 100%-owned subsidiary of the
Company.

TaxNet, Inc., an Arizona corporation, is a 100%-owned subsidiary of BPA.
No. 74-5920.

#### Lee *v.*United States.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Dale OAKLEY, Robert L. Corcoran, Leonard Corcoran and Vivian Corcoran, Appellants, v. E. L. BALL, Herbert Ringe and Newport Jensen Development, Inc., Appellees.

No. 76-2705.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 26, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 13, 1977.

Jeffrey G. Wood, of Icard, Merrill, Cullis, Timm & Furen, Sarasota, for appellants.

Walter M. Meginniss of Crary, Buchanan & Meginniss, Chartered, Stuart, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

Our review of the briefs and appendix leads us to the conclusion that appellants have failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion by the trial court. Accordingly, the order appealed from is

AFFIRMED.

MAGER, C. J., and DOWNEY and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

On petition for rehearing appellants take an entirely new tack and suggest reversal of the order appealed from because although a hearing was held below on appel-lees’ motion to discharge the lis pendens no evidence was adduced. This is an entirely new contention not raised in appellants brief. This is the first notice to this court that appellants assert they were aggrieved by some procedural deficiency in the trial court and it comes too late. Fla.App. Rule 3.14(b); *In re Certificate of N.Y. to Compel Atten. of Wit.,*297 So.2d 865 (Fla.4th DCA 1974).

*7Accordingly, appellants petition for rehearing is DENIED.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and DOWNEY and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
(Mark One)

[X]   ANNUALREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

 

or

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark ifthe registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of theSecurities Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark ifthe registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days. Yes [X] No [ ]

 

Indicate by check mark ifdisclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will notbe contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy orinformation statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-Kor any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of“large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company”in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).Yes [ ] No [X]

 

State the aggregate marketvalue of the voting and non-voting partnership interests held by non-affiliatescomputed by reference to the price at which the partnership interests were lastsold, or the average bid and asked prices of such partnership interests as ofthe last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscalquarter.  No market exists for the limited partnership interests of theRegistrant, and, therefore, no aggregate market value can bedetermined.

**DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BYREFERENCE**

**None**
Exhibit 10.2
    


     


    REVOLVING DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


    Initially $969,000


    (as amended from time to time on Exhibit A) Effective July 19, 2007


    LRM Industries, LLC ("Maker"), promises to pay to the order of NOVA Chemicals Inc. ("Holder"), at Holder's office or at such other place as Holder may designate in writing, in lawful money of the United States of America, the principal sum of the Outstanding Loan Amount on demand. The "Outstanding Loan Amount" shall initially be $969,000 but shall be amended to reflect additional loans ("Additional Loans") made by Holder to Maker from time to time, in the sole discretion of Holder, as set forth in Exhibit A hereto. Upon the making of each Additional Loan, Maker and Holder shall initial the entry of such Additional Loan amount on Exhibit A. Interest shall accrue from the date of this Note, with respect to the initial Outstanding Loan Amount, and from the date of each Additional Loan, with respect to the amount of each such Additional Loan, at a rate of 8.25% per annum, compounded quarterly, until paid.


    This Note, together with accrued and unpaid interest to date, may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time by Maker.


    In connection with the enforcement of Holder's rights hereunder, Maker waives diligence, presentment, protest, demand and notice of any kind whatsoever. The non-exercise by Holder of any of its rights hereunder in any particular instance shall not constitute a waiver thereof in any subsequent instance.


    In the event of any default hereunder, Maker agrees to pay all costs and expenses of collection, including without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees.


    This Note shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the internal laws of the State of New York without regard to principles of conflicts of law.


    LRM Industries, LLC


    By: /s/ Gary Cook


    Name: Gary Cook

    Title: Chairman of the Board of Managers

    


    
      Exhibit A
    


     


    	
          Additional Loan Amount

        	
          Date of Additional Loan/Loan Credit

        	
          Revised Aggregate Principal Amount of Loan

        	
           Initials
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         529,543
<SECURITIES>                                 1,386,011
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,331,789
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,405,026
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,952,170
<PP&E>                                         401,302
<DEPRECIATION>                                 227,061
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,294,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,218,564
<BONDS>                                        579,651
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,879
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,899,148
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,294,504
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,581,212
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,002,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,008,985
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             105,040
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                621,379
<INCOME-TAX>                                    53,050
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            568,329
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   568,329
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38


</TABLE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-4061 

_____________________________

WALTON CONSTRUCTION 

SERVICES and SUMMIT,

Appellants,

v.

SHAWN HOLLOWAY,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims.

John P. Moneyham, Judge.

Date of Accident: March 9, 2016.

March 13, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

H. George Kagan of H. George Kagan, P.A., Gulf Stream, for 

Appellants.

Charles F. Beall Jr. of Moore, Hill & Westmoreland, P.A., 

Pensacola, for Appellee.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

Certification of President



I, Ramon Chimelis, President, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Big Sky Industries III, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: January 23,  2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President
Exhibit 99.1

                              MINDEN BANCORP, INC.
                            415 MAIN * P. O. Box 797
                          MINDEN, LOUISIANA 71058-0797

                      -------------------------------------
                             318-377-0523 TELEPHONE
                                318-377-0038 FAX
                                www.mblminden.com


                                  PRESS RELEASE
                                  -------------

For Release:   Immediately                      For Further Information:

                                                A.  David   Evans,
                                                President/CEO
                                                318-377-0523
                                                E-mail-mbldavid@shreve.net
                                                --------------------------
                                                            Or
                                                Becky T. Harrell, Treasurer/CFO
                                                318-377-0523
                                                E-mail-mblbecky@shreve.net
                                                --------------------------




          MINDEN BANCORP, INC. ANNOUNCES DECLARATION OF A CASH DIVIDEND
          -------------------------------------------------------------
                 FOR THE FOURTH QUARTER ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2006
                 -----------------------------------------------


Minden,  LA. - January 10, 2007 - Minden  Bancorp,  Inc.  (NASDAQ OTC BB:  MDNB)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
announced today that its Board of Directors at their meeting on January 9, 2007,
declared its  sixteenth  cash  dividend of $.09 per share on the common stock of
the Company  payable on February 9, 2007, to the  stockholders  of record at the
close of business on January 25, 2007.

The  Company is a holding  company  which owns all the  capital  stock of Minden
Building and Loan Association,  a  Louisiana-chartered  FDIC thrift, and Woodard
Walker  Insurance   Agency,  a  leading  property  and  casualty  agency,   both
headquartered in Minden, Louisiana. At September 30, 2006, the Company had total
assets  of  $115.2  million,  total  liabilities  of $95.4  million,  and  total
stockholders' equity of $19.8 million.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, George J. Bilek, Vice President, Finance of Juno Lighting, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1)  The annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Juno Lighting, Inc. 
Dated: February 25, 2004



/s/ GEORGE J. BILEK
George J. Bilek
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
Attachment VII 

Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Analysis 

Health and Safety Code Section 40920.6(a) requires air districts to identify one or more 

potential control options that achieve at least the same benefit as the proposed rule, assess the 

cost-effectiveness of those options, and calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness. The 

proposed amendments to Rule 67.0 are based on the Air Resources Board Suggested Control 

Measure (SCM) for Architectural Coatings. The only alternative that achieves at least the 

same benefit is the adoption of the final VOC limits, effective 2005 and 2006 contained in 

South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) Rule 1113. The overall costeffectiveness of the final VOC limits in Rule 1113 estimated by the South Coast district is 

$8.18 per pound of VOC reduced. The incremental cost-effectiveness of adopting the 

SCAQMD VOC limits instead of the proposed Rule 67.0 limits is $10.49 per pound of VOC 

reduced. The incremental cost-effectiveness is calculated by dividing the incremental 

annualized costs by the incremental annual emission reductions projected to occur in the 

District. These calculations are summarized in the following table. 

Table 5 - Calculation of Incremental Cost-Effectiveness for SCAQMD Rule 1113 Final VOC 

Limits Option 

SDAPCD Rule 67.0 Architectural Coatings 

Baseline Inventory 10.3 tons/day 

Annualized Emissions Reductions 1.5 tons/day = 1,095,000 lbs/year 

Cost Effectiveness $3.19/lb 

Annualized Cost for Proposed Rule 67.0 $3,493,000 

SCAQMD Rule 1113 Architectural Coatings 

Control Efficiency 46% 

Cost-Effectiveness $8.18 

Emission Reductions 4.7 tons/day = 3,458,740 lbs/year 

Annualized Cost ($8.18)(3,458,740 lbs/yr) = $28,292,493 

Incremental Impacts 

Incremental Annualized Cost $28,292,493 – $3,493,050 = $24,799,443 

Incremental Annual Emission Reductions 3,458,740 – 1,095,000 = 2,363,740 lbs/yr 

Incremental Cost-Effectiveness $24,799,443 / 2,363,740 = $10.49 per pound
#### Robert A. PAFFY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1260.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 28, 1978.

Rehearing Denied May 9, 1978.

Richard ' L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Frank B. Kessler, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert L. Bogen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED on authority of *Moore v. State,*352 So.2d 529 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

CROSS, DOWNEY and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!( !(

!(

Arrowood !(

Pointe

Youngcane

Jack Creek

oungcane

Creek

34

35

37 38

36

36

12

16

15

14

13

!(12

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!( !(

!(

Arrowood !(

Pointe

Youngcane

Jack Creek

oungcane

Creek

34

35

37 38

36

36

12

16

15

14

13

12

\\alismurphy\home\mprlm\projects\landplan\maps\Nottely_land_plan\Nottely_land_plan_for_web.mxd

/

Tile: B2

Jul 24, 2008 Nottely Reservoir

Land Management Plan

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000

Feet
**EXHIBIT32.02**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of PDF Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on May 10, 2010 (the “Report”), I, JoyE. Leo, Chief Administration Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
|     | /s/ JOY E. LEO                                                          |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     | Joy E. Leo                                                              |
| * * | *EVP,  Chief Administration Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer* |
| * * | *(Principal  Financial**Officer)*                                       |

 

Date: May 10,2010

 

----