alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7486

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BEVIL LEE GROVES, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CR-92-28-3-1-H, CA-96-241-5-H)

Submitted: November 25, 1997 Decided: January 13, 1998

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bevil Lee Groves, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Tracy David Knox, UNITED

STATES ARMY, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)) and his Fed. R. Civ. P.

60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Groves, Nos. CR-92-28-3-1-H; CA-96-241-5-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 26 and

May 13, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568

(U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We deny Appellant's motion to

remand this case for new trial. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Irving SCHULMAN, Appellant, v. WASHINGTON FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION OF MIAMI BEACH et al., Appellees.

No. 76-1311.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 19, 1977.

Milton Kelner, Miami, for appellant.

Lapidus & Hollander and Howard J. Hollander, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Harvey Building, Inc. v. Haley,*175 So.2d 780 (Fla.1965).
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# C&E provides cots for Alaska exercise, maintains stock for humanitarian relief

By Jason KaneshiroDLA Troop Support Public Affairs

                PHILADELPHIA  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

## Related Stories

US Army Alaska to host Arctic Anvil drills for first time

## Related Press Advisories

Canadian Army Troops will take part in U.S. Army exercise in Alaska

## Related Links

Arctic Anvil Photo Gallery

Arctic Anvil 2016

Defense Logisitics AgencyDLA Troop SupportArctic Anvil
PUBLIC LAW 110–431—OCT. 15, 2008 122 STAT. 4847 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 3641: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Sept. 27, considered and passed Senate. 

Oct. 2, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–431 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To authorize funding for the National Crime Victim Law Institute to provide support 

for victims of crime under Crime Victims Legal Assistance Programs as a part 

of the Victims of Crime Act of 1984. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION. 

Section 103(b) of the Justice for All Act of 2004 (Public Law 

108–405; 118 Stat. 2264) is amended in paragraphs (1) through 

(5) by striking ‘‘2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009’’ each place it appears 

and inserting ‘‘2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013’’. 

Approved October 15, 2008. 

Oct. 15, 2008 

[S. 3641] 


kgrant on POHRRP4G1 with PUBLAW
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20180]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES

Administration for Children and Families


Agency Recordkeeping/Reporting Requirements Under Emergency 
Review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)

    Title: Child Support Enforcement Program Financial Report, ACF-396.
    OMB No.: New.
    Description: Used by the States to report expenditures and 
estimates made under title IV-D for the purposes of enforcing the 
support obligations owed by absent parents to their children and the 
spouse (or former spouse) with whom such children are living; locating 
absent parents; establishing paternity; and assuring that assistance in 
obtaining support will be available to all children for whom such 
assistance is requested.
    Respondents: States, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam and the 
District of Columbia.

                                             Annual Burden Estimates                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Number of      Average burden                   
               Instrument                     Number of       responses per       hours per       Total burden  
                                             respondents       respondent         response            hours     
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OCSE-396, Part 1 & 2....................                54                 4              4.25               918
OCSE-396, Part 3........................                54                 2               2.0               216
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,134.                                                                     

    Additional Information: ACF is requesting that OMB grant a 180 day 
approval for this information collection under procedures for emergency 
processing by August 15, 1997. A copy of this information collection, 
with applicable supporting documentation, maybe obtained by calling the 
Administration for Children and Families, Reports Clearance Officer, 
Larry Guerrero at (202) 401-6465.
    Comments and questions about the information collection described 
above should be directed to the Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for ACF, Office of Management and 
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20503, (202) 395-7316.

    Dated: July 25, 1997.
Bob Sargis,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-20180 Filed 7-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
Exhibit 10.15


 


Aerospace Defense, Inc.


4838 Jenkins Avenue


North Charleston, SC 29405


Telephone: (843) 744-5174


Facsimile: (843) 747-4092


 


Via
Facsimile (843) 553-3832


Mr. John Wall, III


Force Protection, Inc.  


Force Protection Industries,
Inc.  


9801 Highway 78, Building 1


Ladson, SC 29456


 


Re:                             Amendment
to Industrial Leases by and between Force Protection Industries, Inc. (formerly
Technical Solutions Group, Inc.) and Force Protection, Inc. (collectively “Tenant”)
and Aerospace/Defense, Inc. (“Landlord”) - - One Industrial Lease dated July
13, 2004 covering a portion of Building No. 2 and the other Industrial Lease
dated September 2, 2003 covering Building No. 3. Each Industrial Lease shall be
referenced below as the “Lease” and collectively as the “Leases.”


 


Dear Mr. Wall:


 


This letter, when signed by
representatives of the Tenant and Landlord, shall serve as an amendment (the “Amendment”)
to the Leases.


 


To correct an error in the
Leases, Section 12(b) (Insurance) in each Lease is hereby amended by
amending and restating the 7th line thereof as follows:


 


“...Tenant’s
liability to the Landlord assumed under the indemnification provisions of this
Lease.”


 


Facsimile signatures to this
Amendment shall be considered originals.


 


Except as amended by this
letter, each of the provisions of the Leases remain in full force and effect.


 


Aerospace/Defense, Inc.


 


	
  By:

  	
  /s/ M. Jerry
  Garfinkle

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  M. Jerry
  Garfinkle

  	
   

  
	
  Its:

  	
  Assistant
  Secretary

  	
   

  



 


We agree to the above
Amendment:


 


	
  Force
  Protection, Inc.

  	
  Force
  Protection Industries, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Gordon
  McGilton

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Raymond
  Pollard

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Its:

  	
  CEO 7/18/06

  	
   

  	
  Its:

  	
  COO
PUBLIC LAW 111–143—MAR. 1, 2010 124 STAT. 41 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2950: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Jan. 25, considered and passed Senate. 

Feb. 2, 4, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–143 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To extend the pilot program for volunteer groups to obtain criminal history background checks. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Criminal History Background 

Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2009’’. 

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM. 

Section 108(a)(3)(A) of the PROTECT Act (42 U.S.C. 5119a 

note) is amended by striking ‘‘a 78-month’’ and inserting ‘‘a 92- 

month’’. 

Approved March 1, 2010. 

42 USC 5101 

note. 

Criminal History 

Background 

Checks Pilot 

Extension Act of 

2009. 

Mar. 1, 2010 

[S. 2950] 


anorris on DSK5R6SHH1 with PUBLIC LAWS
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 26, 2010

s0719 

# Order

July 26, 2010

140896

STACEY RILEY, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140896 COA: 290510 Genesee CC: 08-090154-CL ROBERT ENNIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 25, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Morgan F. JONES, Respondent.

No. 52794.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 12, 1978.

David G. McGuenegle, Asst. Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, for The Florida Bar, complainant.

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the Court on Petition for Approval of Conditional Guilty Plea and Entry of Final Order of Discipline.

On November 10, 1977, The Florida Bar filed its Petition alleging:

> “Respondent’s executed plea, received by The Florida Bar on October 10,1977, is a conditional guilty plea to the grievance committee report and record in exchange for a public reprimand to be published in the *Southern Reporter*and taxation of costs against him in the amount $262.31.

> *66“Respondent who practices in Jacksonville, Florida, was retained in August or September 1974, to represent Ted Hardie Bennafield, whose wife had filed a petition for dissolution of marriage on July 25, 1974, in Tampa, Hillsborough County, Florida. In this petition she requested child support, alimony, attorneys fees and partition of the real property. Mr. Ben-nafield paid respondent a total of $250 to represent his interests in the case. Respondent filed an answer for his client by mail on September 10, 1974, in which his client did not oppose the dissolution but contested the other matters including his ability to pay support, alleged his wife was employed and that the property had been purchased solely in his name.

> “Thereafter, the respondent failed to advise his client that the case had been set down for final hearing in Tampa on December 4, 1974. Neither he nor his client attended that hearing and the court was not notified in advance they would not be present. At hearing, the court entered an order granting the requested dissolution of marriage, ordered Mr. Bennafield to transfer his interest in the real property to his ex-wife as lump sum alimony, directed him to pay $10 a week in child support for his minor child along with a $1 collection fee weekly and ordered him to pay his ex-wife’s attorneys fee in the amount of $300 and $75 for court costs.

> “After entry of the court’s order on January 15,1975, Mr. Bennafield was furnished a copy of the order by respondent and also advised by the court where to pay the child support. Mr. Bennafield’s subsequent contacts with respondent proved unsatisfactory and no post judgment relief was requested through or obtained by respondent for his client. Thereafter, these proceedings arose. The grievance committee found respondent’s conduct violated Disciplinary Rules 1— 102(A), 6-101(A) and 7-101(A) of The Florida Bar’s Code of Professional Responsibility.”

The Petition for Approval of Conditional Guilty Plea is granted, and Respondent, Morgan F. Jones, is hereby disciplined by public reprimand to be published in the Southern Reporter based upon the facts set forth above. The publication of this Opinion shall serve as the public reprimand to Respondent.

Costs in the amount of two-hundred and sixty-two dollars and thirty-one cents ($262.31) are hereby taxed against the Respondent.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ENGLAND, HATCHETT, KARL and DREW (Retired), JJ., concur.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Audit readiness progress, goals outlined at all-hands meeting  

By Sara MooreDLA Public Affairs

                FORT BELVOIR, Virginia  –              DLA Finance

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Financial StewardshipAudit Readiness
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 23 (Monday, February 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 7779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02378]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9776-1]

Office of Environmental Information; Announcement of Availability 
and Comment Period for the Draft Quality Standard for Environmental 
Data Collection, Production, and Use by Non-EPA (External) 
Organizations and Two Associated QA Handbooks; Extension of Comment 
Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency published a document in 
the Federal Register of December 26, 2012, concerning request for 
comments for the Draft Quality Standard for Environmental Data 
Collection, Production, and Use by Non-EPA (External) Organizations and 
two associated QA Handbooks. The notice of availability is being 
extended to a 62 day review and comment period to provide more time for 
external reviewers to provide comments. This document extends the 
comment period for 17 days, from February 11, 2013, to February 28, 
2013.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before February 11, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Warren, Environmental Protection 
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, MC 2811R, Washington, DC 20460; 
Phone: 202-564-6876; email address: quality@epa.gov.

    Dated: January 29, 2013.
Monica D. Jones,
Director, Quality Staff.
[FR Doc. 2013-02378 Filed 2-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0724 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JAY LE CLEVELAND,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 24, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 17 2023

04/17/2023
NOTE

SUBJECT: Summary of February 15, 2012, meeting with American Chemistry Council

TO: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0182 and EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0180

FROM: Katherine Sleasman, 202-564-7716

The American Chemistry Council (ACC) hosted a meeting that included industry

representatives from Bayer, BASF, Huntsman, Gorilla Glue, Dow, Fomo, Sika, Spray

Polyurethane Foam Alliance (SPFA), and the Center for the Polyurethanes Industry (CPI) who 

met with EPA, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), National Institute for

Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease 

Registry (ATSDR). Industry representatives provided an overview of new information related to 

the 2011 Action Plans on methylene diphenyl diisocyanates (MDI) and related compounds and 

toluene diisocyanates (TDI) and related compounds. Presentation topics included product 

stewardship initiatives, raw material growth, medical surveillance advances, industrial hygiene 

practices for anticipated exposures, and a brief overview of the different uses of unreacted MDI 

and TDI in a variety of polyurethane products including coatings, sealants, and spray foam. EPA 

representatives were in a listening mode and all materials shared will be made available in the 

public docket. A copy of the ACC’s presentation materials are attached to this note. 

The development of a Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) on TDI, the 8(c) notice, and 

8(d) Health and Safety Rule were not discussed at this meeting.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

Consent of IndependentCertified Public Accountants

 

We have issued our report datedFebruary 14, 2003, accompanying the consolidated financial statements includedin the Annual Report of Bio-Technology General Corp. on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2002.  We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the registrationstatement Nos. 33-51202, 33-83904, 33-69870, 33-41591, 33-41593, 333-36121,333-33073, 333-33075, 333-64541, and 333-87344 on Form S-8 of Bio-TechnologyGeneral Corp.

 

 
|                | /s/ GRANT  THORNTON LLP |   |   |
|---------------------|-------------------------|--------|--------|
|                |                    |
| New York,  New York |                    |
| March 28,  2003     |                    |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0325 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOSHUA RICHARD LARSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 30, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 24 2022

10/24/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0325
Exhibit 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the report of I.A. Europe Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Victor Minca, President of the Company (the Company's chief executive officer),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




                                    /s/ Victor Minca
                                    --------------------
                                    Victor Minca
                                    President
                                    Date:  June 5, 2003