alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



ARTICLE
I  OFFICES
   1.
    
    PLACE OF MEETINGS.
  2.
    
    ANNUAL MEETING.
  3.
    
    SPECIAL MEETINGS.




---



##### 



4.
    
    FIXING RECORD DATE.
  5.
    
    NOTICE OF MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS.
  6.
    
    WAIVERS.
  7.
    
    QUORUM OF SHAREHOLDERS.




---



##### 



8.
    
    PROXIES.
   9.
    
    QUALIFICATION OF VOTERS.
  10.
    
    VOTE OF SHAREHOLDERS.
    11.
    
    WRITTEN CONSENT OP SHAREHOLDERS.
   1.
    
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS.




---



##### 



2.
    
    NUMBER OF DIRECTORS.
  3.
    
    ELECTION AND TERM OF DIRECTORS.
  4.
    
    NEWLY CREATED DIRECTORSHIPS AND VACANCIES.
  5.
    
    REMOVAL OF DIRECTORS.
  6.
    
    RESIGNATION.




---



##### 



7.
    
    QUORUM OF DIRECTORS.
  8.
    
    ACTION OF THE BOARD.
  9.
    
    PLACE AND TIME OF BOARD MEETING.
  10.
    
    REGULAR ANNUAL MEETING.
  11.
    
    NOTICE OF MEETING OF THE BOARD, ADJOURNMENT.




---



##### 



12.
    
    CHAIRMAN.
  13.
    
    EXECUTIVE AND OTHER COMMITTEES.
  14.
    
    COMPENSATION.
  15.
    
    CHAIRMAN EMERITUS/FOUNDER.
   1.
    
    OFFICES, ELECTION, TERM.
    2.
    
    REMOVAL, RESIGNATION, SALARY, ETC.




---



##### 



3.
    
    PRESIDENT.
  4.
    
    VICE-PRESIDENTS.
  5.
    
    SECRETARY.




---



##### 



6.
    
    ASSISTANT-SECRETARIES.
  7.
    
    TREASURER.
          8.
    
    ASSISTANT-TREASURER.




---



##### 



9.
    
    SURETIES AND BONDS.
   1.
    
    CERTIFICATES.
  2.
    
    LOST OR DESTROYED CERTIFICATES.
  3.
    
    TRANSFERS OF SHARES.




---



##### 



4.
    
    CLOSING TRANSFER BOOKS.




---



#####
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Global Earth Energy, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending May 31, 2013, I, Edmund J. Gorman, Chief Financial Officer of Global Earth Energy, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending May 31, 2013, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending May 31, 2013, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global Earth Energy, Inc.

Dated:  July 18, 2013.

/s/ Edmund J. Gorman

Edmund J. Gorman, Chief Financial Officer and  Principal Accounting Officer of Global Earth Energy, Inc.
(Reap. Dec. 9123)

#### F. L. Kraemer & Co. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 878784; 878788.

(Decided April 9, 1958)

*787
      *Eugene B. Pichrell*for the plaintiff. ■

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

WilsoN, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, defendant, that the items marked “A”, and initialed BS by Examiner B. Struminski, on the invoices covered by the instant appeals for reappraisement consist of Dehydro-acetic Acid exported from Western Germany.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that when said above-mentioned items marked “A” and initialed by the Examiner were exported from Germany, such and similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of Germany.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or about the dates of exportation, the export value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Western Germany, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was $2.12 per pound net packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the instant appeals for reappraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise identified by the items marked “A” and initialed BS by Examiner B. Struminski on the invoices, and that such value was $2.12 per pound, net packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# C_2014184EN.01002502.xml

| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/25

---

Order of the President of the Court of 25 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal do Trabalho de Lisboa — Portugal) — Jorge Ítalo Assis dos Santos v Banco de Portugal

(Case C-566/13) (1)

1

2014/C 184/42

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 31, 1. 2. 2014.

1

---
EXHIBIT 31(a)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Kinney, chief executive officer of Technology Acquisition Corporation
("Registrant") certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB ("Report") of
Registrant;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the period presented in this Report;

      4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the Registrant and have:

            a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
      ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being
      prepared;

            b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about
      the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and

            c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an quarterly report) that has materially affected, or is
      reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting; and

      5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
      design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which
      are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to
      record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

            b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal
      controls over financial reporting.

Date: August 16, 2004


/s/ John Kinney
------------------------------------
John Kinney, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32


                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SLS International, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
John Gott, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael L. Maples, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



/s/ John Gott
---------------------------
John Gott
Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2006


/s/ Michael L. Maples
---------------------------
Michael L. Maples
Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2006


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21512]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #2976]


State of North Carolina (And Contiguous Counties in South 
Carolina)

    Mecklenburg and Stanly Counties and the contiguous Counties of 
Anson, Cabarrus, Davidson, Gaston, Iredell, Lincoln, Montgomery, 
Richmond, Rowan, and Union in the State of North Carolina, and 
Lancaster and York in the State of South Carolina constitute a disaster 
area as a result of flooding damages caused by Hurricane Danny on July 
22 and 23, 1997. Applications for loans for physical damages may be 
filed until the close of business on October 6, 1997 and for economic 
injury until the close of business on May 5, 1998 at the address listed 
below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, 
Atlanta, GA 30308.
    The interest rates are:

For Physical Damage

    HOMEOWNERS WITH CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE, 8.000%.
    HOMEOWNERS WITHOUT CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE, 4.000%.
    BUSINESSES WITH CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE, 8.000%.
    BUSINESSES AND NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS WITHOUT CREDIT AVAILABLE 
ELSEWHERE, 4.000%.
    OTHERS (INCLUDING NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS) WITH CREDIT AVAILABLE 
ELSEWHERE, 7.250%.

For Economic Injury

    BUSINESSES AND SMALL AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES WITHOUT CREDIT 
AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE, 4.000%.
    The numbers assigned to this disaster for physical damage are 
297608 for North Carolina and 297708 for South Carolina. For economic 
injury, the numbers are 957500 for North Carolina and 957600 for South 
Carolina.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: August 5, 1997.
Aida Alvarez,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-21512 Filed 8-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
U.S.I)epor"-"of Transportation 

O~t ce or r:e S.eoeff.lr y Of ro~ ~O'::> ".J' Qf) 

Chief. Documentary Services Div. 

Department of Transportation 

Washington. D.C. 20590 

DESIGNATION OF AGENT FOR 

SERVICE OF NOTICE. PROCESS. ORDERS 

DECISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS 

ATTENTION: DOCKET SECTION. C-55 

Aeronexus Corporate (PTY) Ltd 

(Name of Company. please prin!l 

office at ~8l94, &vfAN C4-. .- J . t.7 ((.)I"' ( 

(Address) 

. ha"·ing its principal 

hereby designates. pursuant to section 46103 of Title 49 of the U.S. Code tformerly section lOO:'it hl of the Federal A\ iation Act 

of 1958. as amended I the person named t>.:low as its Agenl upon \\·hom sen i~ c: of all notices and pn:x:es.,,. and all onJ.:r,_ decision ... . 

and requirements of the Department of-Transportation may bl: m<1de for and on behalf of said carrier. hereby canc.:ling all pre' inus 

designations of agent~ made by it to the DOT. 

Joanne W. Young, Kiretein & Young, PLLC 

Name of Agent ----------------~-------------------------------------------------------- (Please Print) 

1750 K Street NW, Ste. 200; Washington, DC 20006 

Address ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Agent so designated has written his name and also his initials in the following space: 

Name ------------------------------------- (Initials) ----------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF. ___ A_e_r_o_n_e_x_u_s_c_o.::.p_o_r_a_t_e_(_P_T_Y_)_L_t_d ______________ has caused these 

presents to be signed in its name by 

(Name of Company) 

__ S:::::::._;_Vi~CN~___:::J::____!_p-=e]i~EJ2£=· =-..:E::....:_;)\1~---· President 

(Please Print) 

of said company. and to be attested under its corporate seal by 

(Secretary. or other Title) 

on this ---+'......L-- day of ___ ~,__---'~-==-k(l--OL_Lvf_, __ i'Y' _2QJ3. 

I 

ATTES~' 

. - __. ..... \Tt:"'"' ' 

: ~p>---<<~, -, ~"lLL~ E:;~US caf~ 

f( (;: . '" ,, ~'i) 

<__ ;:::;;:;.il __. By Sl{~ pef (President} ~ 

(Name of Company) 

(Secretary . or other officer) 

OST F 1010.5 (1-95)
#### Dr. David A. SPRING v. STEVENS READY-MIX CONCRETE, INC.

No. 59754.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 1977.

In re: Stevens Ready Mix Concrete, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, 343 So.2d 256, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Writ denied. On the facts- found the result is correct.

DIXON, J., dissents from the denial.
Comdisco, Inc. and Subsidiaries                                    Exhibit 12.00

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(dollars in millions)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                              For the years ended September 30,
                                                       1999         1998         1997         1996         1995
                                                       ----         ----         ----         ----         ----
<S>                                                    <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>           <C>
Fixed charges
  Interest expense                                      $341        $329         $301          $267         $278<F1>
  Approximate portion of
    rental expense representative
    of an interest factor                                  6           5            4             7           11
                                                        ----         ----        ----          ----         ----
  Fixed charges                                          347         334          305           274          289
Earnings from operations
  before income taxes , net of preferred
  stock dividends                                         75         238          203           176          160
                                                        ----        ----         ----          ----         ----
Earnings from operations before income taxes
 and fixed charges                                      $422        $572         $508          $450         $449
                                                        ====        ====         ====          ====         ====

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                      1.22        1.71         1.67          1.64         1.55
                                                        ====        ====         ====          ====         ====
Rental expense:
  Equipment subleases                                   $  4        $  5         $  6          $ 14         $ 22
  office space, furniture, etc.                           14           9            7             8           10
                                                        ----        ----         ----          ----         ----
    Total                                               $ 18        $ 14         $ 13          $ 22         $ 32
                                                        ====        ====         ====          ====         ====
    1/3 of rental expense                               $  6        $  5         $  4          $  7         $ 11
                                                        ====        ====         ====          ====         ====


<FN>
<F1>
Includes interest expense incurred by  technology  services and included in
technology services expense on the consolidated statements of earnings.

</FN>
</TABLE>
                                      -45-
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1340

AN ACT

To amend the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act

to extend the date after which surplus funds in the

wildlife restoration fund become available for apportionment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 1340 ES

1 SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF SURPLUS FUNDS IN WILD2 LIFE RESTORATION FUND.

3 Section 3(b)(2)(C) of the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife

4 Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 669b(b)(2)(C) is amended by

5 striking ‘‘2006’’ and inserting ‘‘2016’’.

Passed the Senate September 9, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1340

AN ACT

To amend the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoraavailable for apportionment. funds in the wildlife restoration fund become tion Act to extend the date after which surplus
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 20, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44247-44248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21889]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

48 CFR Parts 213, 214, 215, and 242

 [DEARS Case 95-D715]


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Past 
Performance

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense (DoD) has decided to withdraw a 
proposed rule published at 60 FR 57691, November 17, 1995. The rule 
proposed amendments to the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation 
Supplement (DFARS) to implement Section 1091 of the Federal Acquisition 
Streamlining

[[Page 44248]]

Act of 1994 (Pub. L. 103-355) and Office of Federal Procurement Policy 
Letter 92-5, Past Performance Information. Subsequent to publication of 
the proposed rule, numerous policy issues relating to the collection 
and appropriate use of past performance information were identified. 
The DoD Past Performance Integrated Process Action Team (IPT) is 
currently determining the appropriate resolution to these issues. 
Therefore, DFARS Case 95-D715 is closed and the proposed rule is 
withdrawn. A new DFARS case will be opened after the DoD Past 
Performance IPT develops its recommendations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Defense Acquisition Regulations 
Council, Attn: Ms. Melissa Rider, PDUSD (A&T) DP (DAR), IMD 3D139, 3062 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3062. Telephone (703) 602-0131; 
telefax (703) 602-0350.
Michele P. Peterson,
Executive Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations Council.
[FR Doc. 97-21889 Filed 8-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hartmarx Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Glenn R. Morgan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 8, 2008

|                    |  |                                                     
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                   
|/s/ GLENN R. MORGAN
|Name:               |  | Glenn R. Morgan                                     
|Title:              |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 29, 2020

No. 04-20-00437-CV

PROGRESO LLC and Progreso La Michoacana Meat Market San Antonio #10, LLC,

Appellants

v.

Rosamaria GONZALEZ,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI25139

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

A copy of appellant’s notice of appeal was filed in this court on September 9, 2020. In 

accordance with section 51.017(a) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, a notice of 

appeal must be served on each court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record.

TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.017(a).

The clerk of the court notified the appellant in writing that the certificate of service 

attached to the notice of appeal filed in this appeal does not certify that any court reporter was 

served. The clerk instructed the appellant to file an amended notice of appeal certifying proper 

service on the responsible court reporter(s). An amended notice of appeal has not been filed.

 

It is therefore ORDERED that Joseph D. Zopolsky file an amended notice of appeal in 

compliance with section 51.017(a) within ten days from the date of this order. If appellant fails 

to file an amended notice of appeal within the time provided, an order will be issued directing 

Mr. Zopolsky to appear and show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failing to file 

the amended notice of appeal. The clerk of this court shall cause a copy of this order to be 

served on Mr. Zopolsky by certified mail, return receipt requested, or give other personal notice 

of this order with proof of delivery.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of October, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
#### Thomas (NMN) LYNCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2104.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 13, 1977.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Frank B. Kessler, Chief, App. Div., Asst. Public Defender, and James K. Green, Legal Intern, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Paul H. Zacks, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CROSS, ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.