alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1226 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1226

 To provide jurisdiction over Federal contractors who engage in human 
                         trafficking offenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 2005

   Mr. Akaka introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide jurisdiction over Federal contractors who engage in human 
                         trafficking offenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Contractor Extraterritorial 
Jurisdiction for Human Trafficking Offenses Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL CONTRACTOR EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION.

    Chapter 77 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
``Sec. 1596. Federal contractor extraterritorial jurisdiction
    ``(a) Whoever, while a Federal contractor, engages in conduct 
outside the United States that would constitute a violation of this 
chapter punishable by imprisonment for more than 1 year if the conduct 
had been engaged in within the special maritime and territorial 
jurisdiction of the United States shall be punished as provided for 
that offense.
    ``(b) No prosecution may be commenced against a person under this 
section if a foreign government, in accordance with jurisdiction 
recognized by the United States, has prosecuted or is prosecuting such 
person for the conduct constituting such offense, except upon the 
approval of the Attorney General or the Deputy Attorney General (or a 
person acting in either such capacity), which function of approval may 
not be delegated.
    ``(c) An individual who is a victim of a violation of this chapter 
by a Federal contractor may bring a civil action against the 
perpetrator under section 1595 if a civil action would have been 
authorized under section 1595 had the conduct been engaged in within 
the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
    ``(d) As used in this section, the term `Federal contractor' means 
a person who--
            ``(1) is employed as a contractor (including a 
        subcontractor at any tier), or as an employee of a contractor 
        (or subcontractor at any tier), of any executive agency, as 
        that term is defined in section 4(1) of the Office of Federal 
        Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(1));
            ``(2) is present or residing outside the United States in 
        connection with such employment; and
            ``(3) is not a national of or ordinarily resident in the 
        country where the violation occurred.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

Certification of President



I, Ramon Chimelis, President, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Big Sky Industries III, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: January 30, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-23-00272-CV

__________________

OILFIELD STEEL SUPPLY, LLC, Appellant

V.

HUMBERTO FRANCISCO LENIEK, GARETH NICHOLAS JONES, 

ALEJANDRO GARCIA VILLAMIL, LS JOHN INVESTMENTS, LLC, 

NJMAP, LP, AND MOAF, LP, Appellees

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 457th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 23-07-09844-CV

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Oilfield Steel Supply, LLC (the appellant) and Humberto Francisco Leniek, 

Gareth Nicholas Jones, Alejandro Garcia Villamil, LS John Investments, LLC, 

NJMAP, LP, and MOAF, LP, who are the appellees, filed an agreed motion to 

dismiss this accelerated appeal. SeeTex. R. App. P. 42.1. The parties agree that when 

the appellees filed a notice of nonsuit in the trial court, the temporary injunction that 

is the subject of this accelerated appeal became moot.
2

We grant the motion and dismiss the accelerated appeal. See id. 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on November 8, 2023

Opinion Delivered November 9, 2023

Before Horton, Johnson and Wright, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 150 (Tuesday, August 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42134-42135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20551]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis 
Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: To evaluate research grant R03 AI41597-01 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Date: August 11, 1997.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to Adjournment.
    Place: Teleconference, 6003 Executive Boulevard, Solar Bldg., 
Room 4C01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-2550.
    Contact Person: Dr. Kevin Callahan, Scientific Review Adm., 6003 
Executive Boulevard, Solar Bldg., Room 4C20, Bethesda, Md 20892, 
(301) 496-8424.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate a grant application.
    This meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in sections 552(b)(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the

[[Page 42135]]

discussions could reveal confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the applications and/or 
proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days period to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.855, 
Immunology, Allergic and Immunologic Diseases Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health)

    Dated: July 29, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-20551 Filed 8-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION TO R EINSTATE

Appellate case name: Lucrecia Mendia v. Fiesta Mart, LLC

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00018

- CV

Trial court case number: 2017

- 63727

Trial court: 333rd District Court of Harris County

We abated this appeal on July 23, 2020 for the trial court to hold a hearing to

determine whether the missing Exhibit D was lost or destroyed and to determine whether

the parties could agree on a replacement for the missin g exhibit. On September 24, 2020,

a supplemental clerk’s record was filed containing the trial court’s findings from a hearing

conducted on September 22, 2020, along with an agreed

- to replacement for the missing

Exhibit D. Appellant has now filed a n unoppo sed motion to reinstate the appeal on the

active docket.

We grant the motion and reinstate the appeal on the active docket.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Adams

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: October 8 , 2020
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF HANGER, INC.

Each of the subsidiaries in the following list is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hanger, Inc., unless otherwise indicated below:

Name

State/Country of
IncorporationAccelerated Care Plus Corp.

DelawareAccelerated Care Plus Leasing, Inc.

DelawareDosteon Solutions, LLC(1)

MarylandHanger Europe, N.V.(2)

BelgiumHanger Prosthetics & Orthotics, Inc.

DelawareHanger Risk Management, Inc.

NevadaInnovative Neurotronics, Inc.

DelawareLinkia, LLC(1)

MarylandOPNET, Inc.

NevadaSouthern Prosthetic Supply, Inc.

GeorgiaThe following are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Hanger Prosthetics & Orthotics, Inc.ABI Orthotic/Prosthetic Laboratories, Ltd.(1)

OhioAdvanced Prosthetics of America, Inc.

FloridaBarth Orthotic and Prosthetic Services, Inc.

IllinoisBioConcepts, Inc.

IllinoisCreative Orthotics & Prosthetics, Inc.

New YorkColorado Professional Medical, Inc.

ColoradoDibello's Dynamic Orthotics and Prosthetics, Inc.

TexasElite Care Incorporated

ArizonaEugene Teufel & Son Orthotics & Prosthetics, Inc.

PennsylvaniaFaith Prosthetic-Orthotic Services, Inc.

North CarolinaGadsden Limb & Brace, Inc.

AlabamaGenesis Medical Group, LLC

OregonGreat Plains Orthotics & Prosthetics, Inc.

IowaHanger Prosthetics & Orthotics East, Inc.

DelawareHanger Prosthetics & Orthotics West, Inc.

CaliforniaInnovative Prosthetic Care, Inc.

MississippiInnovative Prosthetic Care Tupelo, LLC

MississippiKarsten Prosthetic Laboratories, Inc.

ColoradoLiberty Health Services, LLC(1)

DelawareMississippi Artificial Limb & Brace, LLC

MississippiMissoula Orthotics and Prosthetics Laboratories, Inc.

MontanaMK Prosthetic & Orthotic Services, Inc.

TexasNebraska Orthotic & Prosthetic Services, Inc.

NebraskaOrPro, Inc.

CaliforniaOrthopedic Rehabilitation Products, Ltd.

ColoradoOrthotic & Prosthetic Technologies, Inc.

TexasOrtho-Medical Products, Inc.

New YorkPlattner Orthopedic Company

IllinoisProsthetic Care, Inc.

South CarolinaProsthetic Care of Anderson, LLC

South CarolinaRainier Surgical Incorporated

WashingtonScope Orthotics & Prosthetics, Inc.

CaliforniaTeam Post-Op, Inc.

CaliforniaThe Brace Shop Prosthetic Orthotic Centers, Inc.

OhioUS Orthotics and Prosthetics, Inc.

Virginia


---



Name

State/Country of
IncorporationWasatch Orthotics & Pedorthics, LLC(1)

UtahThe following are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Hanger Prosthetics & Orthotics West, Inc.Elite Care, Incorporated.

ArizonaScope Orthotics & Prosthetics, Inc.

CaliforniaThe following are wholly-owned subsidiaries of OrPro, Inc.Prosthetic Care, Inc.

South CarolinaProsthetic Care of Anderson, LLC

South Carolina


(1)Limited
Liability Company(2)Hanger, Inc.
owns 60% of Hanger Europe, N.V., a Belgian limited liability company.


---



QuickLinks
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Distribution Operation Team’s Rozier honored at DLA 48th annual employee recognition ceremony

By DLA Distribution Public Affairs

                FORT BELVOIR, Virginia  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA 48th annual employee recognition ceremonyDLADistribution
* Pursuant to the 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 19, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20304

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDGAR Galicia-Moreno,

also know as Rolando Sanchez Martinez,

also known as Rolands Martinez,

also know as Rolando S. Martinez,

also know as Edgar Moreno Galicia, 

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:04-CR-182-ALL

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel, Thomas A. Martin, moves for leave

to withdraw and filed an Anders1 brief in support of his motion. 

Galicia-Moreno did not file a response. After review both of

counsel’s brief and of the record, we conclude that no
2 See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

nonfrivolous issues remain for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED.2
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lawrence Financial Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the "report), I, Jack Blair,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                /s/ Jack L. Blair
                             -----------------------
                             Chief Executive Officer
                                  Jack L. Blair
                                   May 9, 2003
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries III, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 2, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries III, Inc.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. John T. LUCK, d/b/a Tommy’s News.

No. 59619.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 4, 1977.

In re: John T. Luck, d/b/a Tommy’s News and Shreveport News Agency, Inc., applying for supervisory writs and stay order.

Stay order denied. The Club Magazine case relied on has been dismissed. The right of this relator to apply for supervisory relief is reserved.

SUMMERS, J.,

is of the opinion the stay order should be unqualifiedly denied.

DIXON and CALOGERO, JJ., dissented in dismissing the Club Magazine ease and would grant the stay order in this case.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43149-43150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21196]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3202-000]


Appalachian Power Company; Notice of Filing

August 6, 1997.
    Take notice that Appalachian Power Company (APCo), on July 28, 
1997, tendered for filing with the Commission proposed modifications to 
its Rate Schedule FPC No. 23. The modifications are designed to provide 
off-peak excess demand, surplus power and back-up service to Kingsport 
Power Company (KgPCo).
    APCo proposes an effective date of August 1, 1997, and states that 
copies of its filing were served on KgPCo and the Tennessee Regulatory 
Authority.
    Any persons desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the

[[Page 43150]]

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
285.214). All such motions or protests should be filed on or before 
August 18, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21196 Filed 8-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Publications

Table 1.Extinction statistics for Snake River spring/summer chinook salmon based on redd counts in index areas excluding the Grande Ronde River from 1957 to 1990 and including the Grande Ronde River from 1964 to 1990. Results are based on the model of Dennis et al. (1991).

Mean = infinitesimal mean.Variance = infinitesimal variance.Nq = current index value.Ne = "endangered" threshold (the index value at which the probability of of reaching extinction within the next 100 years is 5%).Nt = "threatened" threshold (the index value at which the probability of reaching the "endangered" threshold within the next 10 years is 50%).P1 (100) = probability of reaching N = 1 within the next 100 years.Pe (10) = probability of reaching N = Ne within the next 10 years.

Table of Contents