alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32
                                                                      ----------


                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of SLS
International, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), John Gott, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



/s/ John Gott
-------------
John Gott
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
July 23, 2004


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 152 (Thursday, August 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20807]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. OA96-14-003]


Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation; Notice of Filing

August 1, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 2, 1997, Central Hudson Gas & Electric 
Corporation tendered for filing its compliance filing in the above-
referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before August 11, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and available for inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20807 Filed 8-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lawrence Financial Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"report),

I, Jack Blair, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

        1. The report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                             /s/ Jack Blair
                             -----------------------
                             Chief Executive Officer
                                   Jack Blair
                                November 15, 2004




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       28
#### Cragg GOSS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2382.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 10, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 10, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Kurt Marmar, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Ronald A. Dion, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: *Brown v. State,*328 So.2d 497 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.191(a)(1) and 3.191(b)(1).
Exhibit 32.1




                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

         The  undersigned   executive   officer  of  WVS  Financial  Corp.  (the
"Registrant")  hereby certifies that the  Registrant's  Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the three  months  ended  December  31,  2006 fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




                                                  /s/ David J. Bursic
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  David J. Bursic
                                                  President and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer


Date:  February 06, 2007


Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to WVS Financial Corp. and will be retained
by WVS Financial  Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.


                                      E-3
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Global Earth Energy, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending February 28, 2013, I, Edmund J. Gorman, Chief Financial Officer of Global Earth Energy, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending February 28, 2013, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending February 28, 2013, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global Earth Energy, Inc.

Dated: April 22, 2013.

/s/ Edmund J. Gorman

Edmund J. Gorman, Chief Financial Officer and
    Principal Accounting Officer of Global Earth
    Energy, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21199]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. FA95-9-002]


Central and South West Services, Inc.; Notice of Filing

August 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on June 5, 1997, Central and South West Services, 
Inc., tendered for filing its refund report in the above-referenced 
docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motions to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motion or protests should be filed on or before August 18, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21199 Filed 8-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 13

- 00424

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A .K.A., A CHILD

From the 74th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013

- 2340

- 3

ORDER

This appeal was referred to mediation on January 9, 2014. The parties were
ordered to confer and attempt to agree upon a mediator . We have received notice that
the parties have been unable to agree upon a mediator. According ly, the Court assigns
R.B. Pool as the mediator for this proceeding. His address and contact number is as

follows:

408 West Nash Terrell, Texas 75160 (972) 524

- 7585
All other provisions of the order referring the appeal to mediation, dated January

9, 2 014 , remain in effect, including that the mediation must occur within thirty daysIn the Interest of A.K.A., a Child Page 2

after the date of this Order assigning a mediator

.

PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis , and Justice Scoggins Mediator assigned Order issued and filed February 6, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1219 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1219

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To authorize certain tribes in the State of Montana to enter into a 
 lease or other temporary conveyance of water rights to meet the water 
         needs of the Dry Prairie Rural Water Association, Inc.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE OF WATER RIGHTS TO DRY PRAIRIE RURAL 
              WATER ASSOCIATION, INC.

    (a) In General.--The Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck 
Indian Reservation, Montana (referred to in this section as the 
``Tribes'') may, with the approval of the Secretary, enter into a lease 
or other temporary conveyance of water rights recognized under the Fort 
Peck-Montana Compact (Montana Code Annotated 85-20-201) with the Dry 
Prairie Rural Water Association, Incorporated (or any successor non-
Federal entity) for the purpose of meeting the water needs of that 
association, in accordance with section 5 of the Fort Peck Reservation 
Rural Water System Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-382; 114 Stat. 1454).
    (b) Conditions of Lease.--With respect to a lease or other 
temporary conveyance described in subsection (a)--
            (1) the term of the lease or conveyance shall not exceed 
        100 years; and
            (2)(A) the lease or conveyance may be approved by the 
        Secretary without monetary compensation to the Tribes; and
            (B) the Secretary shall not be subject to liability for any 
        claim relating to any compensation or consideration received by 
        the Tribes under the lease or conveyance.
    (C) No Permanent Alienation of Water.--Nothing in this section 
authorizes a permanent alienation of any water by the Tribes.

            Passed the Senate February 1, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1219

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To authorize certain tribes in the State of Montana to enter into a 
 lease or other temporary conveyance of water rights to meet the water 
         needs of the Dry Prairie Rural Water Association, Inc.
```
#### Harold L. PEIRSON and Dorothy Peirson, Appellants, v. COLLIER COUNTY ROOFING CORPORATION, a corporation, Appellee.

Nos. 76-1956, 76-1957 and 76-1972.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 29, 1977.

*419Michael S. Olin and Robert Orseck of Podhurst, Orseck & Parks, Miami, and Wagner, Cunningham, Vaughan, May & Genders, Tampa, for appellants.

John L. Laskey and E. Glenn Tucker of Treadwell, Emerson & Elkins, Naples, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs/appellants, Harold L. Peirson and Dorothy Peirson, appeal from the entry of summary judgments rendered in favor of defendant/appellee, Collier County Roofing Corporation, in an action filed by appellants for personal injuries sustained by appellant, Harold Peirson, while in the employ of a subcontractor, as a result of the alleged negligence of an employee of another subcontractor. We reverse.

In making a motion for summary judgment the movant bears the burden of proving the absence of the existence of a genuine issue of material fact. *Holl v. Talcott,*191 So.2d 40 (Fla. 1966). Here, the record contains nothing to resolve the issue of whether the general contractor and the owner of the premises were the same legal entity. *See Jones v. Florida Power Corp.,*72 So.2d 285 (Fla. 1954).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent herewith.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and GRIMES and OTT, JJ., concur.
#### DRS. HOWARTH & SCOTT, P.A., a Medical Professional Association, and Dr. German Montoya, Petitioners-Relators, v. The Honorable Claude R. EDWARDS, Dr. Bruce Brunson and James Driscoll (Medical Mediation Panel Members), Respondents.

No. 77-2244.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 13, 1977.

Charles W. Abbott of Maguire, Voorhis & Wells, P.A., Orlando, for petitioners-rela-tors.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

ON SUGGESTION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION

The circuit judge sitting as a judicial referee in a medical mediation panel refus*176ed to grant Petitioners’ Motion for Summary Judgment. He declared he had no authority to grant a summary judgment. He is right. See, for example, *Floyd v, Goss,*352 So.2d 1189 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). Although it is not determinative of this case we note that Writ of Prohibition is not the proper remedy. Certainly medical mediation panels are the only forums to hear these medical mediation claims under Section 768.44, Florida Statutes (1975). They have jurisdiction. If Petitioners are correct that the Statute of Limitations ran before the claim was filed then that is a matter of affirmative defense for the trial court, not the panel or any member thereof, to decide.

Suggestion for Writ of Prohibition is DENIED.

CROSS and LETTS, JJ., concur.
#### J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc. (Capper & Capper, Ltd.), et al. *v.*United States

No. 6903.

Entry No. 1635, etc.

Invoices dated Edinburgh, Scotland, December 1942, etc.

Certified December 1942, etc.

Entered at Chicago, Ill., January 5, 1943, etc.

(Decided February 20, 1947)

*Wallace & Schwartz (Joseph Schwartz*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for.the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

MANDATE

TO THE 15TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF GRAYSON COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Di strict of Texas, on the 21 st day of February, 2018 , the cause on appeal to revise or reverse the trial court’s order denying relief on an application for writ of habeas corpus in

EX PARTE JOSE GUST AVO

CASTANEDA

No. 05

- 17

- 01135

- CR On Appeal from the 15th Judicial District Court, Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 067247

- A. Opinion delivered by Justice Boatright. Justices Lang

- Miers and Brown participating.

was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the order of the trial court denying relief on appellant’s application for writ of habeas corpus is AFFIRMED

.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of the Court of Appe als for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behalf, and have it duly obeyed and executed.

WITNESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Dallas, this 21st day of May, 2018. 

# 5 L M

LISA MATZ, Clerk
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Edward J. WARD, Jr., Appellee.

No. 77-86.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 24, 1978.

Janet Reno, State’s Atty. and Milton Robbins, Asst. State’s Atty., for appellant.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.

Before HAYERFIELD, C. J., and HEN-DRY and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The State of Florida appeals an order granting defendant, Edward J. Ward, Jr., a new trial following, his conviction for burglary of a structure.

The State argues that where the subject burglary information against Ward alleged ownership in the “Eagle Family Discount Stores, Inc.” and the evidence at trial showed ownership in “Eagle Family Discount Stores” and all other elements of the crime were proved, such a variance when considered in light of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.140(o) is not so material as to require a new trial.

The State has misconceived the issue involved in the instant case. The above variance was not the ground for entry of the appealed order granting the new trial. The basis for this order was the insufficiency of the proof of ownership of the burglarized structure.

The well established law is that the ownership of the building alleged to have been burglarized is one of the material and substantive elements which must be proved to sustain a burglary conviction. *Smith v. State,*96 Fla. 30, 117 So. 377 (1928); *Sifford v. State,*202 So.2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967); *Mitchell v. State,*317 So.2d 465 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

*126There is no evidence in the record which proved or tended to prove that the burglarized structure was owned by Eagle Family Discount Stores, Inc. or that it had any possessory interest therein. The proof with respect to the subject structure was descriptive only in that it was variously labeled the “Eagle Army-Navy Store”, “Eagle Department Store”, “Eagle Discount Store” and “Eagle Army-Navy”. Cf. *Lopez v. State,*106 Fla. 361, 143 So. 303 (1932).

We, therefore, find that the trial court was eminently correct in granting Ward a new trial. See *Sifford, supra.*

Affirmed.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 43133]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21281]

[[Page 43133]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARCHITECTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS COMPLIANCE BOARD

36 CFR Parts 1190 and 1191

Accessibility Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas; Meeting of 
Regulatory Negotiation Committee

AGENCY: Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.

ACTION: Regulatory negotiation committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board 
(Access Board) has established a regulatory negotiation committee to 
develop a proposed rule on accessibility guidelines for newly 
constructed and altered outdoor developed areas covered by the 
Americans with Disabilities Act and the Architectural Barriers Act. 
This document announces the dates, times, and location of the next 
meeting of the committee, which is open to the public.

DATES: The committee will meet on: Wednesday, September 24, 1997, 2:00 
p.m. to 6:00 p.m.; Thursday, September 25, 1997, 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 
p.m.; Friday, September 26, 1997, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The committee will meet at the Holiday Inn, 611 Ocean 
Street, Santa Cruz, California. On September 25, 1997, the committee 
will meet at Beneficial Designs Inc., 5858 Empire Grade, Santa Cruz, 
California from 4:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. for a presentation on research 
projects related to outdoor developed areas.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Greenwell, Office of Technical 
and Information Services, Architectural and Transportation Barriers 
Compliance Board, 1331 F Street, NW., suite 1000, Washington, DC, 
20004-1111. Telephone number (202) 272-5434 extension 34 (Voice); (202) 
272-5449 (TTY). This document is available in alternate formats 
(cassette tape, braille, large print, or computer disc) upon request. 
This document is also available on the Board's web site (http://www.access-board.gov/rules/outdoor.htm).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In June 1997, the Access Board established a 
regulatory negotiation committee to develop a proposed rule on 
accessibility guidelines for newly constructed and altered outdoor 
developed areas covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act and the 
Architectural Barriers Act. (62 FR 30546, June 4, 1997). The committee 
will hold its next meeting on the dates and at the location announced 
above. The meeting is open to the public. The meeting site is 
accessible to individuals with disabilities. Individuals with hearing 
impairments who require sign language interpreters should contact Peggy 
Greenwell by September 2, 1997, by calling (202) 272-5434 extension 34 
(voice) or (202) 272-5449 (TTY).
Lawrence W. Roffee,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 97-21281 Filed 8-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8150-01-P
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Catalyst [electronic resource]: a publication of the Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other DrugPrevention.**
 
1994:Winter
1995:Winter | Fall
1996:Winter | Summer
1997:Winter | Spring/Summer | Fall
1998:Winter | Spring | Fall
1999:Winter/Spring | Summer | Fall
2000-01:Spring/Fall/Spring-Summer
2005:Spring
2006:Winter | Spring| Summer
2007:Winter | Spring| Summer | Fall
2008:Winter | Spring| Fall
2009:Spring | Summer
2010:Spring | Summer
2011:Winter
 
SuDoc Number:ED 1.2/17:
Item Number:0455-P (online)
CGP systemNumber:000570155
 
September 19, 2019
Exhibit 99(g) 

                     [PETERS ELWORTHY & MOORE LETTERHEAD]
                        Salisbury House, Station Road
                          Cambridge CB1 2LA England

Our Ref:    PRC/J
Date:.      24 March 1999

NCT Group, Inc.
(formerly Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc.)
1025 West Nursery Road, Suite 120
Linthicum, MD  21090-2103  USA

Dear Sirs:

We consent to the inclusion of our opinion on the financial  statements of Noise
Cancellation  Technologies  (Europe) Limited as of December 31, 1998 and for the
year ended December 31, 1998, included in the Annual Report on Form
10-K.

Yours faithfully

/s/ PETERS ELWORTHY & MOORE