alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 March 17, 2006 Before Hon. RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge Hon. ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge Nos. 04-2557 and 04-2592 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. PIERRE DAWSON and ALFONZO INGRAM, Defendants-Appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 02 CR 688 Elaine E. Bucklo, Judge

.
O R D E R On Paladino remand, the judge stated simply: “The issue before me is whether I would have imposed the same sentences on these defendants if I had known the Sentencing Guidelines were advi sory. In this case I would have imposed the same sentences.” The sentences were guideline sentences and such sentences are, as we held in United States v. Mykytiuk , 415 F.3d 606,608 (7th Cir. 2005), presumptively reasonable under the new regime of the Bookercase. The defendants in the present case do not contend that th e judge refused to consider or address any arguments they may have ma de for why the guidelines sentences imposed on them were unreasonable. Their only contention is that Mykytiuk is inconsistent with Bookerand should be overruled. It is not in consistent, and we shall not overrule it. The judgment is A FFIRMED
. UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         542,290
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               51,103,932
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (380,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         371,675
<DEPRECIATION>                               (266,235)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              54,510,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       40,772,584
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    13,738,217
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                54,510,801
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,591,094
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,914,454
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,440,051
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,236,589
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (769)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,237,358
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,237,358
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71




</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42244-42245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20703]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-664-000]


Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

July 31, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 24, 1997, Texas Eastern Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Eastern), 5400 Westheimer Court, Houston, Texas 
77056-5310, filed a request with the Commission in Docket No. CP97-664-
000, pursuant to Sections 157.205, and 157.211 of the Commission's 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to 
construct a delivery point in Fulton County, Pennsylvania, so that 
Texas Eastern may provide natural gas deliveries to Penn Fuel Gas, Inc. 
(Penn

[[Page 42245]]

Fuel), a local distribution company and an existing Texas Eastern 
customer authorized in blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-
535-000, all as more fully set forth in the request on file with the 
Commission and open to public inspection.
    Texas Eastern proposes to construct and install a 4-inch tap valve 
and a 4-inch check valve on Texas Eastern's existing 36-inch Line No. 2 
at approximate Mile Post 1263.41 in Fulton County, Pennsylvania (Tap). 
In addition Penn Fuel will install a dual 3-inch meter run (Meter 
Station), approximately 50 feet of 4-inch pipeline which would extend 
from the Meter Station to the Tap, and electronic gas measurement 
equipment. Texas Eastern states that Penn Ford would reimburse Texas 
Eastern for 100% of the costs and expenses that Texas Eastern would 
incur for installing the facilities. The costs and expenses are 
estimated to be approximately $148,000 including an allowance for 
federal income taxes.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after the 
Commission has issued this notice, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or 
notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the request. If 
no protest is filed within the allowed time, the proposed activity 
shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time 
allowed for filing protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn 
within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant 
request shall be treated as an application for authorization pursuant 
to Section 7 of the NGA.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20703 Filed 8-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Ex parte STATE of Alabama ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL.

SC 77-181.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 22, 1977.

EMBRY, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER and ALMON, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.1

News Release

Release Date:   Thursday, January 11, 2007

Release Time:   Immediate

Contact:        Eric E. Stickels, Executive Vice President & CFO

Phone:          (315) 366-3702

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oneida Financial Corp. Increases Semiannual Dividend

         Oneida, NY, January 11, 2007 - Michael R. Kallet, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Oneida Financial Corp. (NASDAQ:ONFC), today announced that
the Company has declared a cash dividend of twenty-four cents ($0.24) per share
of the Company's common stock for the six month period ended December 31, 2006.
The dividend represents an increase of one cent ($0.01) per share as compared
with the previous semiannual dividend payment. The dividend is payable to
shareholders of record as of January 23, 2007 and will be paid on February 6,
2007.

         The Board of Trustees of Oneida Financial MHC, the majority shareholder
of the company owning 57.5% of the outstanding common stock, intends to continue
waiving its receipt of cash dividend payments.

             Oneida Financial Corp. reported total assets at September 30, 2006
of $434.2 million and shareholders' equity of $55.8 million. The Company's
wholly owned subsidiaries include; The Oneida Savings Bank, a New York State
chartered FDIC insured stock savings bank, State Bank of Chittenango, a state
chartered limited-purpose commercial bank, Bailey, Haskell & LaLonde Agency, an
insurance and financial services company and Benefit Consulting Group, an
employee benefits consulting and retirement plan administration firm. Oneida
Savings Bank was established in 1866 and operates eight full-service banking
offices in Madison, Oneida and Onondaga counties.
No. 99-7941.

#### Cook *v.*United States.

Cer-C. A. 10th Cir. tiorari denied.
No. 99-7790.

#### Weldon *v.*Holt, Warden, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1192 

To amend section 51 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

the eligibility for the work opportunity tax credit to all disabled veterans. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 7, 2005 

Mr. SALAZAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend section 51 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

to expand the eligibility for the work opportunity tax 

credit to all disabled veterans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Warm Welcome Home 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress makes the following findings: 

8 (1) The work opportunity tax credit is a $2,400 

9 tax credit to encourage employers to hire several dif-
2

•S 1192 IS

1 ferent types of job seekers, including certain vet2 erans. 

3 (2) The work opportunity tax credit has been a 

4 valuable tool for assisting veterans and has helped 

5 bring many out of poverty. 

6 (3) The work opportunity tax credit is limited 

7 to veterans who are— 

8 (A) receiving food stamps; or 

9 (B) physically or mentally disabled and 

10 who are going through or have completed voca11 tional rehabilitation training. 

12 SEC. 3. WORK OPPORTUNITY TAX CREDIT. 

13 (a) EXPANSION OF ELIGIBILITY TO ALL DISABLED

14 VETERANS.—Section 51(d)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue 

15 Code of 1986 is amended— 

16 (1) by striking ‘‘who is certified’’ and inserting 

17 the following: ‘‘who— 

18 ‘‘(i) is certified’’; and. 

19 (2) by striking the period at the end and insert20 ing the following: ‘‘; or 

21 ‘‘(ii) has a disability rating under sec22 tion 1155 of title 38, United States Code, 

23 of not less than 10 percent.’’. 

24 (b) PUBLICATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF EX25 PANDED TAX CREDIT.— 
3

•S 1192 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Labor 

2 shall— 

3 (A) publicize the expansion of the work op4 portunity tax credit under subsection (a); and 

5 (B) provide technical assistance to employ6 ers desiring to take advantage of the tax credit. 

7 (2) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—

8 There are authorized to be appropriated to the Sec9 retary of Labor $2,500,000 for each of fiscal years 

10 2006 through 2010 to carry out paragraph (1).

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21441]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Environmental Assessment (EA) and Finding of No Significant 
Impact (FNSI) for the Relocation of Military Traffic Management Command 
(MTMC) CONUS Command Headquarters to Fort Eustis, Virginia

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Pub. L. 101-510, the Defense Base Closure 
and Realignment Act of 1990, the Defense Base Closure and Realignment 
Commission recommended the closure of Military Ocean Terminal, Bayonne, 
New Jersey, and the Oakland Army Base, California, and relocation of 
MTMC Western Area and MTMC Eastern Area Headquarters to a location to 
be determined by the Army. The U.S. Army selected Fort Eustis, 
Virginia, as the preliminary site.
    An Environmental Assessment (EA) examined the proposed transfer of 
472 positions (approximately 35 military and 437 civilians) to Fort 
Eustis, Virginia, and the associated construction of the administrative 
facility. Plans for relocation include renovating existing space in 
Buildings 661 and construction of a 34,900 square foot addition.
    MTMC CONUS Command Headquarters would be the sole occupant of the 
unified structure. Personnel currently working in the selected building 
will be permanently relocated to building 662. It is anticipated that 
139 civilian personnel will transfer with their positions.
    The EA found that no significant adverse environmental impacts 
would occur as a result of the proposed action. Therefore, based on the 
analysis found in the EA, which was incorporated into the FNSI, it has 
been determined that implementation of the proposed action will not 
have significant individual or cumulative impacts on the quality of the 
natural or human environment. Because no significant environmental 
impacts will result from implementation of the proposed action, an 
Environmental Impact Statement is not required and will not be 
prepared.

DATES: Public comments will be accepted for 30 days following 
publication of this Notice of Availability before the Army proceeds 
with the proposed action.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the EA/FNSI may be obtained by writing to, and any 
inquiries and comments concerning the same should be addressed to Mr. 
Richard Muller, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District, ATTN: 
CENAO-PL-R, 803 Front Street, Norfolk, VA 23510-1096.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions regarding this FNSI may be directed to the U.S. Army Corps of 
Engineers, ATTN: Mr. Richard Muller, at 757-441-7767.

    Dated: August 8, 1997.
Richard E. Newsome,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Environment, Safety and 
Occupational Health) OASA (I,L&E).
[FR Doc. 97-21441 Filed 8-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPLE FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of MetroPCS, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael N. Lavey, principle financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael N. Lavey                                          
|Michael N. Lavey                                              
|Vice President, Controller and Interim Chief Financial Officer



May 11, 2004
exh6-1_claims.htm


     

    
      

      

    

     

     

     

    EXHIBIT
      6.1

     

    NOTICE
      OF MINING CLAIMS HR#1-6,

    RECORDED
      BY LUNA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO,

    ON
      MARCH 24,2004
#### Hector GUZMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-468.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 17, 1977.

Rehearing Denied July 29, 1977.

Frank A. Kreidler, Belle Glade, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Marsha G. Madorsky, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

*1059PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED on the authority of *Hogan v. State,*330 So.2d 557 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976) and *Pierson v. Sharp,*283 So.2d 880 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).

DOWNEY and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., concurs in result only.
**EXHIBIT23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

The Board of DirectorsNortech Systems Incorporated:

We consent toincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Nos. 33-80906and 33-66246) of Nortech Systems Incorporated on Form S-8 ofour reports dated February 13, 2004, except as to note 4 which is as of March 9,2004, with respect to the consolidated statements of income, shareholders’equity and cash flows of Nortech Systems Incorporated and subsidiary for theyear ended December 31, 2003, and the related financial statement schedulefor the year ended December 31, 2003, which reports appear in the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Nortech Systems Incorporated for the yearended December 31, 2005.

/s/  KPMG LLP

Minneapolis, MinnesotaMarch 9, 2006

51

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20269]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation      Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire 
or control voting securities or assets of a company that engages either 
directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking 
activity that is listed in Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) 
or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to 
banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise 
noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than August 15, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (A. Linwood Gill III, Assistant 
Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. Crestar Financial Corporation, Richmond, Virginia; to acquire 
American National Bancorp, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland, and thereby 
indirectly acquire American National Savings Bank, F.S.B., Baltimore, 
Maryland, and thereby engage in acting as an agent in the sale of 
mutual funds, pursuant to Sec.  225.28(b)(7) of the Board's Regulation 
Y; in acting as an agent in the sale of home mortgage redemption 
insurance, pursuant to Sec.  225.28(b)(11)(i) of the Board's Regulation 
Y; and in acting as agent in the sale of annuities, pursuant to Sec.  
225.28(b)(11)(vii) of the Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 28, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-20269 Filed 7-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 4227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2154]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-23; RM-8972]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Glendo, WY

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by Vixon 
Valley Broadcasting proposing the allotment of Channel 261A at Glendo, 
Wyoming, as the community's first local aural transmission service. 
Channel 261A can be allotted to Glendo in compliance with the 
Commission's minimum distance separation requirements at city reference 
coordinates. The coordinates for Channel 261A at Glendo are North 
Latitude 42-30-12 and West Longitude 105-01-30.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before March 17, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before April 1, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: Victor 
A. Michael, Jr., President, Vixon Valley Broadcasting, c/o Magic City 
Media, 1912 Capitol Avenue, Suite 300, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 
(Petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-23, adopted January 
17, 1997, and released January 24, 1997. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M 
Street, NW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may 
also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 
140, Washington, DC 20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-2154 Filed 1-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P