alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Military Picnic celebrates the ‘diversity of the agency’

By Amanda NeumannDLA Public Affairs

                Fort Belvoir, Virginia  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

military picnicBuschCharles TobinVincent GriffithDLA
No. 55544.

#### C. H. Powell Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 169867-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
Five 

Green 

Things
Five Green ThingsTM has reached 15

and averted 9,600,000 pounds of C
Bridging The Gap’s 25 emplo
...backed by 2700 volunteers, w

improve our environmen
In 2008-09, Heartland Tree Alliance 

trees, mulched 400 trees and foun

for up to 10,000 new tree
Keep Kansas City Beauti

planted 22 public rain garde
Rain barrel workshops pla

483 rain barrels in 2008-0
Kansas City WildLands removed 

plants at 24 events in 2008
Volunteers cleaned up our nationa

on National Public Lands D
2,611 tons of waste was diverted 

with the help of 648 volunte
Keep Kansas City Beautiful su

80 community cleanups of 75 

urban trash and over 14,000 
Walking School Bus assisted 27 sch

getting kids out of cars and onto 
Clean Commute created biking cu

free bikes and maintenance at 
Five Green ThingsTM explained to 1

reduce their gasoline and electricity 
The Environmental Business Netw

457 business people to share “

knowledge at eight event
Confusion and apathy surround envi
Five 

Green

ThingsTM

For Teens
...and Five Green ThingsTM for Kid

taught hundreds the value of conse

Five 

Green 

Things



Bridging The Gap’s monthly newslet

pages give green info to 25,000 peopl

our media outreach is 3,500 eac
To learn more about Bridging T

visit www.bridgingthegap.
#### Ex parte Doyle W. CHAMBERS.

No. 77-129.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 2, 1977.

JONES, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23(b)

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-6300, 33-19372, 33-38928, 33-38925,
33-86726, 333-14607, 333-29949, 333-85988, and 333-99233 of MFIC Corporation (the "Company") on Form S-8 of our report
dated March 29, 2001, except for Note 6, as to which the date is April 13, 2001, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of MFIC Corporation for the year
ended December 31, 2002.

/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston,
Massachusetts
March 24, 2003

---

QuickLinks
----

----

| 1.     | The      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934, as amended; and |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.     | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the LP. |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 1,      2008                                                                                                   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                                             |   |   |
| /s/      Mark Gatto                                                                                                              |   |   |
| Mark      Gatto                                                                                                                  |   |   |
| Co-Chief      Executive Officer and Co-PresidentICON      Capital Corp.General      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight BL.P. |
EXHIBIT 21


                            SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


                                        State of            Percentage
          Subsidiary                    Incorporation       of Ownership
          --------------------------------------------------------------


          Advanced Mammography
            Systems, Inc.               Delaware             61.7
          Medical Diagnostics, Inc.     Delaware            100
          Western Massachusetts
            Magnetic Resonance
            Services, Inc.*             Massachusetts       100
          MRI Associates, Inc.*         Massachusetts       100
          MDI Investment, Inc.*         Massachusetts       100
          Greater Springfield
            MRI, Inc.*                  Massachusetts       100
          Greater Boston MRI
            Services, Inc.*             Massachusetts       100
          Mobile MRI of Western
            Mass., Inc.*                Massachusetts       100
          Central Massachusetts
            MRI Services, Inc.*         Massachusetts       100
          Casco Bay MR Services, 
            Inc.*                       Maine               100
          MDI Finance and Leasing,
            Inc.*                       Massachusetts       100
          Merrimack Scanning, Inc.*     New Hampshire       100
          Middlesex MRI Center,
            Inc.*                       Massachusetts       100
          MDI-New York Inc.*            New York            100
          MDI Rehab, Inc.*              Massachusetts       100
          Meritus Health Systems,
            Inc.*                       Virginia            100
          Technician Services, Inc.*    Virginia            100
          Meritus-Southwestern
            Virginia, Inc.*             Virginia            100
          Meritus-Iowa, Inc.*           Virginia            100
          Meritus West Virginia,
            Inc.*                       Virginia            100
          Meritus MRI, Inc.*            Virginia            100
          Meritus PLS, Inc.*            Virginia            100



               *  Owned directly by Medical Diagnostics, Inc.
No. 39248.

#### Protests 310669-G, etc., of Happel *&*McAvoy, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel atomizers and perfumeries chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Electronic Clearing House, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Joel M. Barry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.





                                        \s\ Joel M. Barry
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        Joel M. Barry
                                        Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                        December 23, 2002


<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42249-42250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20712]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 1930-014]


Southern California Edison Company; Notice of Availability of 
Draft Environmental Assessment

July 31, 1997.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No.

[[Page 42250]]

486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Hydropower Licensing has reviewed the 
application for a new license for the existing Kern River No. 1 
Project, and has prepared a Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for 
the project. The project is located near Bakersfield, in Kern County, 
California. The DEA contains the staff's analysis of the potential 
environmental impacts of the project and has concluded that licensing 
the project, with appropriate environmental protective measures, would 
not constitute a major federal action that would significantly affect 
the quality of the human environment.
    Copies of the DEA are available for review in the Public Reference 
Room at 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426.
    Any comments should be filed within 30 days from the date of this 
notice and should be addressed to Lois D. Cashell, Secretary, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426. For further information, contact David Turner, Environmental 
Coordinator, at (202) 219-2844.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20712 Filed 8-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Jason Forte**  VP Operations Sky - Futures USA Inc. 1001 S. Diary

Ashford Rd. Suite 100 Houston, Texas 77077 EI N 47 - 164667 3 August 7, 2015 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management Sy stem 1200 New Jersey

Ave., SE Washington, D.C. 20590 Re: Petition for Amendment to Exemption No. 11208 Issued to Sky - Futures USA Inc. Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act (Docket No. FAA - 2014 - 0641) Dear Sir or Madam, Sky - Futures USA Inc. ( “ Sky - Futures ” ) was issued Exemption No. 11208 on March 13, 2015 (hereinafter “the Exemption”) , a llowing commercial operation of the AscTec Falcon 8 UAS to conduct on and off shore oil and gas platform inspection s . Sky - Futures requests an amendment to the Exemption to allow the commercial use of two additional UAS so long as such operations are conducted within and under th e conditions outlined by the Exemption. The Operator’s Manual and Checklists can be accessed via the below links. **1. DJI S1000+**  http://www.dji.com/product/spreading - wings - s1000 - plus **2. DJI Matrice 100**  http://dev.dji.com/en/products/flying - platforms/matrice - 100 These UASs have been approved in previous exemptions. Due to this fact, Sky - Futures feels that this amendment petition is non - controversial and we respectfully request that this amendment be handled summarily . Sincerel y, Jason T. Forte Jason Forte VP Operations Sky - Futures USA Inc. jforte@sky- futures.com
No. 00-6570.

#### Palacio *v.*Jones, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
OCT-22-2001 13:12 DOJ CIUIL DIV.APPEL.STAFF 202 514 9405 P.02/02

i TE STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

FILED

April 6, 2001

No. 01-1370 CeEE-RM-98-440

AIR-CONDITIONING AND REFRIGERATION INSTITUTE; CARRIER

CORPORATION; LENNOX IN'ERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED; NORDYNE

INCORPORATED; RHEEM MFG COMPANY; THE TRANE COMPANY

Petitioners

V.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Respondents

ORDER

Petitioners have filed a motion to dismiss and a motion to

suspend briefing.

The Court suspends the briefing schedule pending resolution

of the petition for reconsideration pending befoxe the DOE. Counsel

are directed to file a status report thirty days from the date of

this order and then every thirty days until disposition of the

reconsideration,

For the Court - By Direction

,. ,,,/s/ Patricia S. Connor

CLERK

;': ' ''' * 3''

EE-RM-STD-98-440 COMMENT 315

OCT-22-2001 13:12 DOJ CIUIL DIU. APPEL. STAFF 202 514 941215 " 

!.lED STATES COURT a: APPEALS 

FOR TIlE FOURnI erR.CUlT 

No. 01-1370 

EE-RM-98-440 

FILED 

April 6. 2001 

AlR.-CONDITIONING AND REFRlGEAATION INSTI'IUl'B; CARRIER 

CORPORATION; LENNOX IN'lERNATIOtW., INCORPORATeD; NORDYNE 

INCORPORATED; RHE.EM MFG C<J.fPANY; nm TRANE COMPANY 

Petitionel:S 

v. 

U.S. DEPAR'IMENI' OF ENERGY; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

R.esponden'ts 

ORDER 

PetitioneIs have filed a motion to dismiss and a mo~ion to 

suspend b~iefing. 

The COUIt suspends the b~iefing schedule pending resolution 

of ~he petition fOI xeconsidexation pending before the DOE. Counsel 

aIe directed to file a s~a~us l:epozt ~hiIty days f~om the date of 

this oIder and then every thil:1:y days until disposi1:ion of the 

reconsideration, 

FOI ~he Cou.rt • By Direction 

_ r"""'~ ",'.il {sl Patricia S. ConnOr \::~ .. ·,,:I' '.', ,'."-_. _______ ~ __ _ 

• (~' CLERK 

.. ~M' ~b:) ~ I' .. 

• I .,~ .~~. 

:_ .': .. J" ..•. 

P.02/02
#### The State of Ohio *v.*Vonderhaar.

*Criminal law*— First *degree murder*— Evidence—Depositions *by accused*— Medical *examination of defendant outside county jail*— Hypothetical *questions upon cross-examination*— What *facts may be included therein.*

(No. 16838

Decided December 29, 1922.)

Exceptions by the Prosecuting Attorney to the Decision of the Common Pleas Court of Hamilton county.

*Mr. Louis H. Capelle,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Charles S. Bell*and *Mr. Chester S. Burr,*assistant prosecuting attorneys, for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Walter M. Loche,*for defendant in error.

By the Court.

The defendant in error was indicted for first degree murder. There followed a conviction, with a recommendation for mercy.

While the prisoner was incarcerated in jail, the trial court, over the objection of the state, permitted the taking of depositions in his behalf in the state of Pennsylvania, and thereafter permitted the same to be read at the trial. The state now contends that these depositions were taken in violation of Section 13668, General Code (107 O. L., 451). In *Morton*v. State, 105 Ohio St., 366, decided at the present term, this court held that above section was violative of the equal protection clause of the state and federal constitutions, and that the repealing clause of that section was also void, and restored the former statute under which these depositions could be taken. *341The exceptions are overruled on the authority of that case.

On the application of the prisoner, excepted to by the state, the trial court made an order that he should be sent to a place outside of the county jail, to-wit, the general city hospital, for X-ray examination. This action was within the court’s discretion and was not error. The exceptions taken in that respect are therefore overruled.

On the trial the defendant offered testimony tending to show insanity, and offered expert witnesses in that behalf. In the briefs of counsel the question propounded is: “Is a hypothetical question propounded on cross-examination to the defendant’s witness objectionable merely because the question does not contain the evidence introduced on behalf of the defendant?” Were the court to answer the question in the abstract it would be answered in the negative, provided of course the prosecutor’s hypothetical question was based upon evidence offered in the case. However in the state of this record, the briefs do not point out the evidence upon which the hypothetical question was based on cross-examination, and for that reason the exceptions will be overruled.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Hough, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Claek, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
EXHIBIT 32
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2007, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
John F. Perotti,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  and I, John F. Foley,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/  John F. Perotti                             /s/  John F. Foley
----------------------                           -------------------
     John F. Perotti                                  John F. Foley
     Chief Executive Officer                          Chief Financial Officer
Specimen Certificate for Common Shares



 Exhibit 4.2 
  

							
	Xinyuan Real Estate Co., Ltd.	  	

	  	
		
		  	XINYUAN REAL ESTATE CO., LTD.
		  	(Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands)
	 Number:
	  	
	XX	  	Number	 		  	Common Shares
		  	XX	 		  	XX
		
	 Common Shares:
	  	US$[XX] Share Capital divided into
	XX	  	[XX] Common Shares of a par value of US$0.0001 each
		
	 Issued to:
	  	
	XX	  	 THIS IS TO CERTIFY
THAT                                       
         XX                        is the registered
  
 holder
of                                       
         XX                        Common Shares in the above-named

  
 Company subject to the memorandum and articles of association
thereof.

		  
	 Dated
 XX

	  
		
	 Transferred from:
	  	
	XX	  	EXECUTED for and on behalf of the Company on
                         2007.
	 XX
  
  

		  	DIRECTOR	 	  
	  	









							
		  	 TRANSFER
	 		  	
				
		  	 I
	 		  	(the Transferor) for the value received
				
		  	 DO HEREBY transfer to
	 		  	(the Transferee) the
				
		  		 		  	shares standing in my name in the
			
		  	 undertaking called XINYUAN REAL ESTATE CO., LTD.
	  	
			
		  	 To hold the same unto the Transferee
	  	
				
		  	 Dated
	 		  	
				
		  	 Signed by the Transferor
	 		  	
				
		  	 in the presence of:
	 		  	
	
	  
  

				
		  	  
	 	  
	  	
		  	Witness	 	Transferor
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Daylight saving time: Spring forward this Sunday

By DLA Public Affairs

                FORT BELVOIR, Va.  –              
Daylight saving time returns this Sunday at 2 a.m. when most Americans set their clocks forward at 3 a.m. Most people regard the change as a time when they lose one hour of sleep, but the practice extends evening daylight so days – particularly summer days – last longer. 

Daylight saving time begins the second Sunday in March and ends the first Sunday in November, when clocks are adjusted one hour back to standard time. 

The United States adopted daylight saving time when the Uniform Time Act of 1966 standardized time zones and daylight saving practices across the United States. 

The act allowed states to pass laws exempting themselves. The only states that don’t observe daylight saving time are Hawaii and most of Arizona. It’s also not observed by these U.S. territories: American Somoa, Guam, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.

 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Daylight Saving TimeDaylight Savings TimeDSTtime change
No. 44430.

#### Protests 947594-G, etc., of Park Holtorf & Guy et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Stokby*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358) it was held that 10 percent allowance should have been made for the weight of the gelatinous material in question.