alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Percy JENKINS v. OGLETREE FARM SUPPLY COMPANY et al.

No. 49764.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 18, 1977.

Laurel G. Weir, Philadelphia, for appellant.

Joe Clay Hamilton, Meridian, for appel-lee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Newton County; O. H. Barnett, Judge.

Before PATTERSON, P. J., and WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1338 

To require the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau of 

Reclamation and the United States Geological Survey, to conduct a 

study on groundwater resources in the State of Alaska, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 29, 2005 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself and Mr. STEVENS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL

To require the Secretary of the Interior, acting through 

the Bureau of Reclamation and the United States Geological Survey, to conduct a study on groundwater resources in the State of Alaska, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alaska Water Re5 sources Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 
2

•S 1338 IS

1 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

2 the Secretary of the Interior. 

3 (2) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the State 

4 of Alaska. 

5 SEC. 3. ALASKA WATER RESOURCES STUDY. 

6 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary, acting through the Com7 missioner of Reclamation and the Director of the United 

8 States Geological Survey, where appropriate, and in ac9 cordance with this Act and other applicable provisions of 

10 law, shall conduct a study that includes— 

11 (1) a survey of accessible water supplies, includ12 ing aquifers, on the Kenai Peninsula, in the Munici13 pality of Anchorage and the Matanuska-Susitna 

14 Borough; 

15 (2) a survey of water treatment needs and tech16 nologies, including desalination, applicable to the 

17 water resources of the State; and 

18 (3) a review of the need for enhancement of the 

19 streamflow information collected by the United 

20 States Geological Survey in the State relating to 

21 critical water needs in areas such as— 

22 (A) infrastructure risks to State transpor23 tation, 

24 (B) flood forecasting, 

25 (C) resource extraction; and 
3

•S 1338 IS

1 (D) fire management. 

2 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 2 years after the date 

3 of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 

4 the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the 

5 Senate and the Committee on Resources of the House of 

6 Representatives a report describing the results of the 

7 study required by subsection (a). 

8 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

9 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

10 as are necessary to carry out this Act.

Æ
In th e S u p re m e Co u rt o f Ge o rg ia

De c id e d: Ju n e 1 5 , 2 0 1 5

S 1 5Y1 1 8 1.IN THE MATTER OF JAMES ALAN LANGLAIS

.

P ER CURIAM.

Th is d isc ip lin a ry m a tte r is b e fo re th e Co u rt o n th e p e titio n o f Ja m e s Ala n

La n g la is (S ta te Ba r No

. 4 3 6 5 1 5 ) fo r v o lu n ta ry su rre nd e r of h is lic e n se , p u rsu a n t

to Ba r Ru le 4 -2 2 7 (b ), fo llo win g h is c on vic ti o n s f o r th re e c o u n ts o f fa lse

sta te m e n ts, two c o u n ts o f fa lse writin g s, a n d two c o u n ts o f first-d e g re e fo rg e ry

.

La n g la i s , wh o wa s a dm itte d to th e Ba r in 2 0 0 3

, a d m its th a t h e e n te re d g u ilty

p le a s to th e se c o u n ts in th e S u p e rio r Co u rt o f Co b b Co u n ty o n Ja n u a ry 3 0

, 2 0 1 5

a n d wa s se n te nc e d a s a F irst Offe n d e r

. L a n g la is fu rth e r a dm its th a t th e se

o ffe n se s a re fe lo n ie s a nd th a t, b y virtu e of h is fe lo n y c o n v ic tio n s, h e ha s

v io la te d Ru le 8.4 (a ) (2 ) of th e Ge o rg ia Ru le s o f P ro fe ssio na l Co nd uc t fo u n d in

Ba r Ru le 4 -1 0 2 (d ). Th e m a x im u m p e n a lty fo r a v io la tio n o f Ru le 8 .4 (a ) (2 ) is

d isb a rm e n t. In its re s p o n s e , th e S ta te Ba r re c o m m e n d s th a t th is Co u rt a c c e p t

La n g la is’s p e titio n fo r v o lu n ta ry su rre n d e r o f h is lic e n se

.

We h a v e re v ie we d th e re c o rd a n d a g re e to a c c e p t La n g la is’s p e titio n fo rth e v o lu n ta ry su rre n d e r of his lic e n se , wh ic h is ta n ta m o u n t t o d isb a rm e n t.

Ac c o rd in g ly

, th e n a m e o f Ja m e s Ala n La n gla is is h e re b y re m o v e d fro m th e ro lls

o f p e rso ns e n title d to pra c tic e la w in th e Sta te o f Ge org ia

. La n g la is is re m in d e d

o f h is d u tie s u n d e r Ba

r Ru le 4-2 1 9 (c ).

Vo lu n ta ry su rre nd e r o f lic e n se a c c e pte d . All th e Ju stic e s c o n c u r.

2
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

Certification of President



I, Ramon Chimelis, President, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Big Sky Industries IV, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: February 3, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President
Exhibit 32(d)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of NCT Group, Inc. ("NCT") on Form 10-K for
the period ending  December 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  we, Michael J.  Parrella,  Chief
Executive  Officer and Cy E. Hammond,  Chief Financial  Officer of NCT, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of NCT.




/s/  Michael J. Parrella
------------------------------
Michael J. Parrella
Chief Executive Officer
April 8, 2004


/s/  Cy E. Hammond
------------------------------
Cy E. Hammond
Chief Financial Officer
April 8, 2004
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Eric JOHNSON v. Charles R. WARD, Judge.

No. 60438.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 27, 1977.

In re: Eric Johnson applying for writ of mandamus.

Writ denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 23

- 00477

- CR Detrick DEROVEN , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 186th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 1996

- CR

- 3437A Honorable Kristina Escalona , Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios , Justice Delivered and Filed: June 14, 2023 DIS MISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION In trial court cause number 1996

- CR

- 3437A, Appellant was tried by a jury and found guilty of capital murder

— multiple perso ns. On November 20, 1997, the trial court sentenced Appellant to confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice

— Institutional Division for life. On January 18, 2022, Appellant filed a motion for forensic DNA testing of evidence. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. art. 64.01(a

- 1). The State filed its response, and the trial court denied the motion on March 16, 2022. An appeal from the decision on a motion for forensic DNA testing “is to a court of appeals in the same manner as an appeal of any othe r criminal matter.” Id.04

- 23

- 00477

- CR

- 2

- art. 64.05; see Gutierrez v. State , 307 S.W.3d 318, 321 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010) (“[A] n order denying DNA testing is an ‘ appealable order ’ under Rule 25.2(a)(2). ”). Appellant’s notice of appeal was due on April 18, 2022. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.2(a) ; Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996)

. More than one year later, on April 27, 2023, Appellant filed a pro se motion for leave to file a late notice of appeal of the denial of his motion for post

- conviction DNA testing. A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) ; see Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals , 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (stating that an out

- of

- time appeal from a final felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure) ; In re Coronado , 980 S.W.2d 691, 692 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding ) (citing T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. art. 11.07 , § 3) (“ Post

- conviction writs of habeas corpus are to be filed in the trial court in which the conviction was obtained [ and ] made returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals. ” ). On May 10, 2023, we ordered Appellant t o show cause in writing by May 31, 2023, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Olivo , 918 S.W.2d at 522 ; Ater , 802 S.W.2d at 243. On May 30, 2023, Appellant , acting pro se, filed a n Inmate Declaration of Indigence, a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and a docketing statement. These documents do not show how Appellant’s notice of appeal was timely or otherwise demonstrate how this court’s jurisdiction has been invoked

. See Olivo , 918 S.W.2d at 522. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM Do not publish
No. 99-7906.

#### Beach *v.*McCormick, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          70,814
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,113
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        738
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               114,538
<PP&E>                                          31,724
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,127
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 136,576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,689
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,771
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,116
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   136,576
<SALES>                                        140,851
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               140,851
<CGS>                                           27,295
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,295
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               113,865
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,494
<INCOME-TAX>                                       243
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,251
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,251
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        


</TABLE>
** We grant the request of Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Delta) for an additional extension of its start-up date for 

the seven Tokyo-Guangzhou frequencies awarded by Notice of Action Taken dated November 24, 2010,

in this Docket. We will require the carrier to institute service with those frequencies no later than June 1, 

2013. Delta’s request for flexibility to use those frequencies in any U.S.-China city-pair market for which 

Delta holds underlying authority, American Airlines, Inc.’s (American) Answer, and American’s related 

request for flexibility, remain under consideration and will be dealt with in a separate order.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Energy command changes hands

By Jonathan Stack, DLA Energy Public Affairs

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

change of commandmcleodChapin
Exhibit 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADPOTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lawrence Financial Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report), I,
RobRoy Walters, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1. The report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                             /s/ RobRoy Walters
                             -----------------------
                             Chief Financial Officer
                                 RobRoy Walters
                                 August 13, 2002
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23



                             Accountants' Consent
                             --------------------

The Board of Directors
Guest Supply, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (File
Nos. 2-89233, 2-89234, 33-22872, 33-63352 and 333-26709) on Form S-8 of Guest
Supply, Inc. of our report dated November 14, 2000, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Guest Supply, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 29, 2000
and October 1, 1999, and the related consolidated statements of income and
comprehensive income, cash flows, and shareholders' equity for each of the
fiscal years in the three-year period ended September 29, 2000, and related
schedules, which report appears in the September 29, 2000 annual report on Form
10-K of Guest Supply, Inc.

                                       /s/ KPMG LLP

Short Hills, New Jersey
December 22, 2000
**NOTE**

**SUBJECT:** Summary

of February

15, 2012, meeting with American Chemistry Council **TO:** EPA - HQ - OPPT - 2011 - 0182 and EPA - HQ - OPPT - 2011 - 0180 **FROM:** Katherine Sleasman, 202 - 564 - 7716 The American Chemistry Council (ACC) hosted a meeting that included industry representatives from Ba yer, B ASF, Huntsman, Gorilla Glue, Dow , Fo mo, Sika, Spray Poly urethane Foam Alliance (SPFA) , and the Center for the Pol yurethane s Industry (CPI) who met with EPA, the Consumer Pr oduct Safet y Commission (CPSC), National In stitute for Occupational Safet y and Health (NIOSH), and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) . Industry

representatives provided an overview of new information related to the 2011 Action Plans o n methylene diphenyl diisocyanates (MDI) and related compounds and toluene diisocy anates (TDI) and related compounds. Presentation topic s included product stewardship initiatives , raw material growth, medical surveillance advances , industrial hygi ene pract ices for anticipated exposures, and a brief overview of the different uses of unreacted MDI and TDI in a variet y of polyurethane products including coating s , sealants, and spray foam. EPA representatives were in a listening mode and all materials shared w i ll be made available in the public docket. A cop y of the ACC’s presentation materials are attached to this note. The development of a Significant New Use R ule (SNUR) on TDI, the 8(c) notice, and 8(d) Health and Safet y Rule were not discussed at this meeting.
Motion GRANTED and Order filed April 18, 2019. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00267-CV

____________

IN RE KOSMOS ENERGY SAO TOME AND PRINCIPE, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

157th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-71987

ORDER

On April 9, 2019, relator Kosmos Energy Sao Tome and Principe, filed an 

unopposed motion, asking this court for leave to withdraw its original mandamus 

record and replace it with the amended mandamus record filed with the motion as 

Exhibit A. The original mandamus record contains no redactions and the amended 

mandamus record contains documents with redactions.
We grant such motion and ORDER the original mandamus record to be 

withdrawn and replaced with the amended mandamus record.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Wise and Zimmerer.

(Chief Justice Frost would deny the motion because the amended mandamus record 

contains documents with redactions; relator has not shown that the documents reviewed by 

the trial court were similarly redacted and in considering the request for mandamus relief, 

this court must review the same evidence the trial court considered.).
EXHIBIT 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Central Jersey Bancorp:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 of Central Jersey Bancorp of our reports dated March 14, 2007 with
respect to the consolidated statements of financial condition of Central Jersey
Bancorp and subsidiary as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, management's
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006
annual report on Form 10-K of Central Jersey Bancorp, incorporated by reference
herein.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Short Hills, New Jersey
June 26, 2007