alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21549]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33432]


Paducah & Louisville Railway--Trackage Rights Exemption--CSX 
Transportation, Inc.

    CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT) has agreed to grant overhead 
trackage rights to Paducah & Louisville Railway (P&L) between the P&L/
CSXT connection at Madisonville, KY, at or near milepost OOH 275, and 
the Providence 1 Mine and Diamond J Mine (Mines) located on CSXT's 
Morganfield Branch, at or near mileposts MB 288.8 and MB 294.1, 
respectively, a distance of approximately 18.8 miles in Hopkins and 
Webster Counties, KY.
    The transaction is scheduled to be consummated on August 8, 1997.
    The purpose of the trackage rights is to allow P&L to handle 
movements of coal from the Mines to the BRT Terminal for blending and 
for barge movement beyond to the Gallatin Steam Plant of the Tennessee 
Valley Authority, and to handle empties via the reverse route under 
contract PAL-C-0761.
    As a condition to this exemption, any employees affected by the 
trackage rights will be protected by the conditions imposed in Norfolk 
and Western Ry. Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as 
modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.--Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 
653 (1980).
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If it contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed 
at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically 
stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33432, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on (1) J. Thomas Garrett, Esq., Paducah & Louisville Railway, 
1500 Kentucky Avenue, Paducah, KY 42003, and (2) Fred R. Birkholz, 
Esq., CSX Transportation, Inc., 500 Water Street, J-150, Jacksonville, 
FL 32202.

    Decided: August 5, 1997.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21549 Filed 8-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
Exhibit 23.1


                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Caprius, Inc.
Fort Lee, New Jersey

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-47517, 33-70834 and 33-78928) of our report dated
November 15, 2001, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Caprius,
Inc. appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
September 30, 2001. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

                                                       /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
                                                       ----------------------
                                                           BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
January 14, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21201]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. FA96-10-001]


Boston Edison Company; Notice of Filing

August 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on May 10, 1997, Boston Edison Company tendered 
for filing its refund report in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before August 15, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21201 Filed 8-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Contingency planner rewarded for role in joint task force

By Christopher GoulaitDLA Energy Public Affairs

                HATTIESBURG, Mississippi  –              Army’s coverage of the event

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA Assessment TeamDLA Rapid Deployment InitiativePlans and OperationsJoint Task Force Port OpeningTurbo Distribution 16-1exerciseDLA Energy
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Natural Gas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Qinan Ji, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 10, 2011





/s/ Qinan JiQinan Ji, Principal Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             172
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1190
<ALLOWANCES>                                       289
<INVENTORY>                                        579
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2254
<PP&E>                                            3227
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1738
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2016
<BONDS>                                            597
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<COMMON>                                           116
<OTHER-SE>                                        1949
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4682
<SALES>                                           2189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 14342
<CGS>                                             1866
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     9505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3155
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 266
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (594)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  5
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (599)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (599)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.053)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.053)
        

</TABLE>
#### Rickey BROWNLEE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2095.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 24, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Karen M. Gottlieb, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arthur Joel Berger, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant Rickey Brownlee was charged by information with possession of cocaine (count 1), possession of heroin (count 2), and possession of not more than five grams of cannabis (count 3). The trial court granted defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal for the State’s failure to establish a prima facie case on the count charging possession of cocaine and the count charging possession of heroin. The third count was submitted to the jury, which returned a verdict of guilty. Defendant was so adjudged and sentenced to nine months in the county jail. This appeal is from that judgment finding the defendant guilty of the misdemeanor of possession of less than five grams of marijuana.

The evidence viewed in the light most favorable to the jury verdict is that the small amount of marijuana was found in a plastic bag on a night stand located between the two beds in a bedroom which the defendant admitted was “his room.” A young female was in one of the two beds located in that room.

Inasmuch as the marijuana was not hidden in any way, and it is apparent from the record that the room and the area where the marijuana was found was occupied by the defendant and another person, we hold that the judgment must be reversed upon the rule stated in *Torres*v. *State,*253 So.2d *121450 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971),1 and authorities cited therein.

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to discharge the defendant.

Reversed and remanded.

1

. “This is a case where the jury may have inferred from the evidence that appellant had custody of the apartment but the record does not contain sufficient facts to support that inference as the only reasonable inference from the evidence. Therefore the judgment and sentence must be reversed . . . ”
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 147 (Thursday, July 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20157]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases 
Special Emphasis Panel meeting.

    Name of SEP: ZDK1-GRB5-02S.
    Date: August 19, 1997.
    Time: 10:00 a.m.
    Place: Room 6as-37E, Natcher Building, NIH, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Francisco O. Calvo, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, NIDDK, Natcher Building, Room 6as-37E, 
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-6600, Phone: 
(301) 594-8897.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    This meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.847-849, 
Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases; Digestive Diseases and 
Nutrition; and Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, 
National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: July 24, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-20157 Filed 7-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42972]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21074]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-433-000]


Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

August 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 1, 1997, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line 
Company (Panhandle) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to 
the filing, to become effective September 1, 1997.
    Panhandle states that this filing is to reinstate the Take-or-Pay 
Volumetric Surcharge pursuant to Section 18.4(g) of the General Terms 
and Conditions (GT&C) of Panhandle's tariff. Panhandle has not fully 
recovered the Second Supplemental TOP Settlement Costs as of June 30, 
1997 and accordingly is proposing to implement a 0.04 cents per Dt. 
volumetric surcharge to be in effect during the twelve month 
Reconciliation Amount Recovery Period which commences September 1, 
1997.
    Panhandle states that copies of this filing are being served on all 
affected customers and applicable state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21074 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### John PENNINGTON and Marcia Pennington, his wife, Appellants, v. Jack SERIG et al., Appellees.

No. 76-2154.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 15, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 4, 1978.

*108Freidin & Goldfarb and Philip Freidin, Miami, for appellants.

Leland E. Stansell, Jr., and Robert A. Glassman, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal an adverse summary judgment in this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of a slip and fall accident.

Jack Serig, defendant-appellee, supervises the annual safety inspection for all school facilities as safety supervisor for the Dade County Board of Public Instruction. On September 25, 1975 Serig recommended to the Board’s maintenance department that the treads on the 4th floor landing of a stairway in the Board’s office building be removed. The maintenance department removed the treads and shortly thereafter Serig inspected the landing and determined it to be safe. On October 5 plaintiff John Pennington sustained personal injuries when he tripped on the landing and fell. He and his wife, Marcia, filed a complaint against Serig and his supervisor, Richard Hale, alleging that the landing was in a defective or dangerous condition due to the negligence of these two defendants in removing or directing the removal of the treads creating a dangerous condition and in failing to warn of this condition. Following pretrial discovery, defendants moved for summary judgment which was entered in their favor. We affirm.

In the absence of any allegation or proof of bad faith or malicious purpose on their part, defendants are immune from personal liability under Section 768.28(9), Florida Statutes (1975). See also *Metropolitan Dade County*v. *Kelly,*348 So.2d 49 (Fla.1st DCA 1977). Second, plaintiffs’ reliance upon the fellow servant rule to establish a duty upon the defendants is misplaced as under the circumstances plaintiffs and defendants cannot be considered fellow servants. See *Sutton v. Hancock,*105 Fla. 497, 500, 141 So. 532, 533 (1932) and Cf. *Williams v. Dade County,*237 So.2d 776, 781 (Fla.3d DCA 1970). Last, if a duty did exist, then such duty was owed to the general public as opposed to a special duty owed to the plaintiffs and, therefore, under the holding of *Modlin v. City of Miami Beach,*201 So.2d 70, 75 (Fla.1967), plaintiffs could not prevail.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           20677
<SECURITIES>                                     45113
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2215019
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (832625)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                313176
<PP&E>                                          145002
<DEPRECIATION>                                (119958)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1476757
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           635784
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         47427
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      786797
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1476757
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1106404
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1162906
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               34637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (56502)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (56502)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (56502)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
#### TOTAL MEDICAL MANAGEMENT, INC., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 97-3.

Oct. 6, 1997.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
#### William Henry RHODES v. Josephine Robinson RHODES.

No. 60730.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 14, 1977.

In re: William Henry Rhodes applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Caddo Parish. 348 So.2d 997.

Writ denied.
Exhibit 99.3 - President Certification (Section 906)


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Absolute Glass Protection, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").
I, John Dean Harper, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.


/s/ John Dean Harper
----------------------------
    John Dean Harper
    President


Date  May 19, 2003
      ------------



<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1


                        CERTIFICATION OF THE PRESIDENT

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    I, Ramon Chimelis, president, treasurer, and secretary, certify that
the forgoing quarterly report on Form 10-QSB containing the financial
statements set forth within fully comply with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o (d)) and that information contained in the quarterly report
presents fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Big Sky Industries X, Inc.


Date: May 20, 2003             /s/ Ramon Chimelis
                               -------------------------------
                               Ramon Chimelis
                               President



<PAGE>