alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

NCT Group, Inc.'s subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 are listed below.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                            Common
                                                          Jurisdiction of                   Equity
Name                                               Incorporation or Organization           Ownership
----                                               -----------------------------           ----------
<S>                                                                                          <C>
NCT Muffler, Inc.                                            Delaware                        100%
NCT Far East, Inc.                                           Delaware                        100%
NCT Hearing Products, Inc.                                   Delaware                        100%
NCT Medical Systems, Inc.                                    Delaware                         90%
Pro Tech Communications, Inc.                                Florida                          86%
Noise Cancellation Technologies (Europe) Ltd.                UK                              100%
Artera Group, Inc.                                           Delaware                        100%
Artera (UK) Limited                                          UK                              100%
Midcore Software, Inc.                                       Delaware                        100%
Midcore Software Limited                                     UK                              100%
ConnectClearly.com, Inc.                                     Delaware                         99%
Distributed Media Corporation                                Delaware                         99%
DMC Cinema, Inc.                                             Delaware                         84%
Hospital Radio Network, Inc.                                 Delaware                        100%
Distributed Media Corporation International Ltd.             UK                              100%
Distributed Media Corporation Ltd.                           UK                              100%
DMC New York, Inc.                                           Delaware                        100%
NCT Audio Products, Inc.                                     Delaware                        100%
NCT Video Displays, Inc.                                     Delaware                        100%
Advancel Logic Corporation                                   California                       99%
Chaplin Patents Holding Company, Inc                         Delaware                        100%
2020 Science Limited                                         UK                              100%

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF THE PRESIDENT

                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    I, Ramon Chimelis, president, treasurer, and secretary, certify that
the forgoing quarterly report on Form 10-QSB containing the financial
statements set forth within fully comply with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o (d)) and that information contained in the quarterly report
presents fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Big Sky Industries VIII, Inc.


Date: May 20, 2003                   /s/ Ramon Chimelis
                                     -----------------------------
                                     Ramon Chimelis
                                     President
NUMBER 13-13-00226-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

BRUCE OLSON AND

GERALD SANSING, Appellants,

v.

CARLOS GARCIA, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 28th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, Bruce Olson and Gerald Sansing, attempted to perfect an appeal from 

an order denying summary judgment signed on February 12, 2013, in cause no.

07-06573-A. Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appeared that there was 

no final, appealable judgment dated February 12, 2013. On June 5, 2013, the Clerk of 
2

this Court notified appellants of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the 

defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 42.3. Appellants were advised 

that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the notice, 

the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellants responded to the 

Court’s notice by providing a copy of the handwritten docket sheet which has an entry 

dated February 12, 2013 stating the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is denied. 

The Nueces County Clerk’s Office has informed this Court that no judgment was 

entered on February 12, 2013. In terms of appellate jurisdiction, appellate courts only 

have jurisdiction to review final judgments and certain interlocutory orders identified by 

statute. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). 

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ failure to 

correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF 

JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a),(c). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

1st day of August, 2013.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PRESIDENT,


SECRETARY
AND GENERAL COUNSEL


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to


§
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Annual Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the
period ending January 31, 2008 (the “Report”), I Christopher J. Ryan , Chief
Executive Officer, President, Secretary and General Counsel of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in
the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Christopher J.
Ryan


Christopher
J. Ryan


Chief
Executive Officer, President, Secretary and
General Counsel





April 14,
2008
#### In re SEIZURE OF ALL COPIES OF MAGAZINE ENTITLED “KNAVE”.

No. 60931.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 1977.

In re: Gimore’s Newsstand and Leo Mice-li applying for writ of certiorari.

Writ granted. Since the search warrant authorized the seizure of all copies of the specified titles and since the petitioner was not afforded a hearing on the question of obscenity before the warrant issued, the procedure was constitutionally deficient. The search warrant and the blanket seizure are quashed and use of the materials as •evidence is suppressed. See *A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas,*378 U.S. 205, 84 S.Ct. 1723, 12 L.Ed. 809 (1964).

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS, J.,

dissent, being of the opinion that reduction of the seizure to one copy would satisfy constitutional requirements.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE FLIGHT STANDARDS AGENCY

11 Jan 11 MEMORANDUM FOR HQ FAA/AGC-10

FROM: HQ AFFSA/A3O

6500 South MacArthur Blvd Bldg 4, Room 124 Oklahoma City, OK 73169

SUBJECT: Title 14 CFR Exemption 5891G (Regulatory Docket FAA-2001-9618)

1. Title 14 CFR Exemption 5891 was granted to the United States Air Force on 4 May 1994. As amended to 5891G, it exempts the USAF from the provisions of 14 CFR Section 91.209 (a) and (b) through 30 April 2011. The requirement for USAF helicopter aircraft to conduct night-vision device flight training operations without lighted aircraft position lights up to 500 feet above ground level remains unchanged. On behalf of the USAF, I hereby request an extension in accordance with Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 11.

2. If you have questions or need further in formation, please contact me at (405) 739-9783 or

email: hqaffsa.a3of@tinker.af.mil . I appreciate your assistance.

TIMOTHY M. KERSEY, Lt Col, USAF Chief, Flight Standards Division

GLOBAL ACCESS FOR AMERICA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0430 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. JEFFREY SCOTT ANDERSON,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 4 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 25 2024

01/25/2024
Case Number: DA 23-0430
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Thomas
      W. Martin, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of ICON Capital
      Corp., the General Partner of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly
      Report of ICON Income Fund Eight B L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q/A
      for
      the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the Partnership.








*Dated:
      December 11, 2007*





*/s/
      Thomas W. Martin*


Thomas
      W.
      Martin


Chairman,
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the General Partner


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


General
      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight B L.P.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Planar Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period
ended September 26, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gerald K. Perkel, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                                 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/    GERALD K. PERKEL                         
|    |  | Gerald K. Perkel                                
|    |  | President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director

Date: December 10, 2008
#### William P. BLACKWELL and Effie A. Blackwell v. Wade HARRIS and Joyce Harris.

SC 2613.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 22, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 3, 1978.

Virgil K. Sanderfer, Birmingham, for appellants.

Bishop K. Walker, Jr., of Nash & Walker, Oneonta, for appellees.

BLOODWORTH, Justice.

Appellants, William and Effie Blackwell, appeal from a judgment in a land line dispute which was decided adverse to them and in favor of appellees, Wade and Joyce Harris, the adjoining land owners. Appel-lees filed suit contending that they had acquired title by prescription to the disputed tract. Appellants answered appellees’ *8complaint and filed a counterclaim, following an unsuccessful motion to dismiss. Appellants claim by deed, appellees by prescription to a certain fence line. Issue was joined. Following an ore tenus hearing, the trial judge personally inspected the premises after which judgment was entered for appellees. Appellants’ application for rehearing and/or motion for new trial and/or judgment notwithstanding the verdict was denied.

On this appeal, appellants contend: that the judgment is contrary to both the law and the facts; that appellees’ possession of the disputed area was neither continuous nor adverse for the requisite statutory period, and, therefore, appellees could not have acquired title by prescription; that appellants did not have actual notice of the ap-pellees’ hostile claim as required by law; that the judgment is null and void insofar as the land is not adequately described in the judgment; and, that the trial court improperly admitted and considered certain evidence.

Appellees’ primary argument is based on an application of the ore tenus rule, which, they contend, is especially appropriate here since the trial judge personally inspected the premises. We agree.

This is the classic case with which this Court has been confronted many, many times, *the fence line v. a quarter section line*— the *adverse possessor v. the record title holder.*

Because of earnest insistence of counsel, we have carefully read and studied the briefs, the issues raised on appeal, the pertinent cases, and portions of the evidence, and must conclude that this is an ore tenus case in which the trial judge must be affirmed. It would serve no useful purpose, in our view, to write anything further.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C. J., and FAULKNER, AL-MON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
No. 99-1149.

#### Kennedy *v.*Dresser Rand Co.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Jagged Peak, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the 13-week period ended March 31, 2006, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 10, 2006
|                   | 
|By:                |  | /s/ Paul B. Demirdjian 
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer
April 16, 1952

No. 8108.

#### *United States*v. *D. Hauser.*

Entered at Tampa, Fla. Reap. Dec. 8085. . Motion by plaintiff.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of  Minden  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10KSB for the period  ending  December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, A.
David Evans,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                             /s/ A. David Evans
                                             --------------------
                                             A. David Evans
                                             President and Chief Executive
                                             Officer April 2, 2007


      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act has  been  provided  to  Minden  Bancorp,  Inc.  and will be
retained by Minden  Bancorp,  Inc. and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       -1-
**Exhibit 23.1    Consents of Experts and Counsel** Consent of    Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration    Statements No.    333-145043,333-139017,    and    333-52148 on    Forms S-8    of our report dated March 14, 2008 on the consolidated    financial statements of Hudson Valley Holding Corp. and on the    effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of    Hudson Valley Holding Corp., which report is included in    Form 10-K    for Hudson Valley Holding Corp. for the year ended    December 31, 2007.     /s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC     Livingston, New Jersey    March 14, 2008 **Exhibit 23.2 Consents    of Experts and Counsel**  Consent of    Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration    Statement Nos. 333-52148, 333-139017 and    333-145043    of Hudson Valley Holding Corp. on    Forms S-8    of our report dated March 15, 2007, March 14, 2008 as    to the effects of the restatements discussed in Notes 1    and 17, (which expresses an unqualified opinion and    includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the adoption of    Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 158,    “Employer’s Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and    Other Postretirement Plans” as of December 31, 2006    and the restatements in Note 1 as to Earnings per Common    Share and Note 17), relating to the consolidated financial    statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hudson    Valley Holding Corp., for the year ended December 31, 2006.     /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP     New York, New York    March 14, 2008
# C_2023308EN.01001401.xml

| 31.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 308/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 308/14

---

Corrigendum to Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2023 financial year – European Union Agency for Railways

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 38 of 31 January 2023
  )

(2023/C 308/03)

On page 48, Revenue, Chapter 2 0:

for:

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | Financial year 2023 | Financial year 2022 | Financial year 2021 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘2 | EU CONTRIBUTION | | | |
| 2 0 | EU CONTRIBUTION | 27 348 635 | 26 278 423 | 25 763 160 ,— |
| | Title 2 — Total | 27 348 635 | 26 278 423 | 25 763 160 ,— |
| ... | | | | |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 37 820 548 | 33 983 956 | 29 589 909 ,—’ |

Title

Chapter

Heading

Financial year 2023

Financial year 2022

Financial year 2021

‘2

EU CONTRIBUTION

2 0

EU CONTRIBUTION

27 348 635

26 278 423

25 763 160 ,—

Title 2 — Total

27 348 635

26 278 423

25 763 160 ,—

...

GRAND TOTAL

37 820 548

33 983 956

29 589 909 ,—’

read:

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | Financial year 2023 | Financial year 2022 | Financial year 2021 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘2 | EU CONTRIBUTION | | | |
| 2 0 | EU CONTRIBUTION | 27 418 274 | 26 278 423 | 25 763 160 ,— |
| | Title 2 — Total | 27 418 274 | 26 278 423 | 25 763 160 ,— |
| ... | | | | |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 37 890 187 | 33 983 956 | 29 589 909 ,—’ |

Title

Chapter

Heading

Financial year 2023

Financial year 2022

Financial year 2021

‘2

EU CONTRIBUTION

2 0

EU CONTRIBUTION

27 418 274

26 278 423

25 763 160 ,—

Title 2 — Total

27 418 274

26 278 423

25 763 160 ,—

...

GRAND TOTAL

37 890 187

33 983 956

29 589 909 ,—’

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA acquisition professional challenges the status quo

By Jonathan StackDLA Energy Public Affairs

                RICHMOND, Virginia  –              
[This is the fourth in a series of videos profiling Defense Logistics Agency acquisition professionals.]

A new acquisition professionals video focusing on a DLA Aviation employee in the program management acquisition career field was released on the organization’s YouTube and Facebook sites March 16.“Challenging the Status Quo” profiles Nicole Byrd, who is Level II certified in contracting and is working on her Level III certification in life cycle logistics.A key message in the video is to embrace the many opportunities available within the agency and the acquisition field. The acquisition videos were created to increase recognition of the importance of education in the DLA acquisition community and to highlight the diversity in its 14 specialty areas. To view the video, visit DLA’s YouTube page or Facebook page.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA AviationDLA Energy