alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 3.03
 
                          Certificate of Secretary
                          ------------------------
                                     of
                                     --
                             Amendment to Bylaws
                             -------------------

        The undersigned hereby certifies that he is the duly elected, 
qualified and acting Secretary of Rational Software Corporation (the 
"Company") and that the amendment to Article III, Section 3.2 of the Company's
Bylaws set forth below was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the 
Company on February 20, 1997 to become effective on February 20, 1997.


        3.2   NUMBER OF DIRECTORS
              -------------------

               The Board of Directors shall consist of eight (8) persons and 
shall be divided into three (3) classes as specified or determined pursuant to
the Certificate of Incorporation of the corporation in effect from time to 
time.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned has hereunto set the undersigned's 
hand this 20th day of February, 1997.


                                        /s/ Robert T. Bond
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Robert T. Bond, Secretary
**Exhibit99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, David A. Rane, ChiefFinancial Officer of SureBeam Corporation (the “Registrant”), do hereby certifyin accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

 

(1) the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended September 30, 2002 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Dated: November 14,  2002 | By:    | /s/  David A. Rane |
|---------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                      |   | David A. Rane           |
|                      |   | Senior Vice President,  |
|                      |   | Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 
 ANNEX B 
 TERMS OF SALE 
 Further to the provisions of the SECONDARY BLOCK TRADE AGREEMENT DATED 21 September 2007 among the Seller, UBS and JPMSL (the “Agreement”), the following terms of sales are agreed:

  

	•	 	 Number of Shares sold: 5,324,529 


  

	•	 	 Purchase Price per Share: £18.00 


  

	•	 	 Aggregate Purchase Price (i.e. total consideration for all the Shares): £95,841,522.00 


  

	•	 	 Trade date: 21 September 2007 


  

	•	 	 Settlement date: 26 September 2007 


 The Seller,
UBS and JPMSL confirm the provisions of the Agreement and acknowledge and agree that these Terms of Sale form part of and shall be read in conjunction with the Agreement. 
 Terms defined in the Agreement shall have the same meanings herein. 
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF these Terms of Sale have been duly executed as of the day and year first before written. 
 For and on behalf of

 UBS LIMITED 
  

									
	By:	 	 /s/ Adrian Lewis
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Tom Johnson

	Name:	 	Adrian Lewis	 		 	Name:	 	Tom Johnson
	Title:	 	Managing Director	 		 	Title:	 	Associate Director

 For and on behalf of 
 J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LTD. 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Rupert Fane

	Name:	 	Rupert Fane
	Title:	 	Managing Director

 Accepted as of the date hereof: 
 NIGHTINGALE ACQUISITION LIMITED 
  

			
	By:	 	


	Name:	 	


	Title:	 	Chairman
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 23(a.)

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-6300, 33-19372, 33-38928, 33-38925, 33-86726, 333-14607, and 333-29949 of
MFIC Corporation (the "Company") on Form S-8 of our report dated March 28, 2000,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of MFIC Corporation for the year
ended December 31, 1999.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 2000
No. 99-7510.

#### Robinson *v.*North Carolina.

Gen. Ct. Justice, Super. Ct. Div., Cumberland County, N. C. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Spectrum Realty, Inc.(the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Anthony Eppolito, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated
      and results of operations of the Company for the period
      indicated.





Dated:  November
11, 2010





/s/ G. Anthony EppolitoG.
      Anthony EppolitoVice
      President and Chief Financial
Officer
### FOR PUBLICATION 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  M ATTHEW C ATE , Petitioner,

v. U NITED S TATES D ISTRICT No. 10-72977 C OURT FOR THE N ORTHERN 

#  D ISTRICT OF C ALIFORNIA , S AN J OSE , ORDER

Respondent, M ICHAEL A NGELO M ORALES and A LBERT G REENWOOD B ROWN ,

Real Parties in Interest. 

# 
Filed September 29, 2010
Before: Andrew J. Kleinfeld, M. Margaret McKeown, and

Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges.

ORDER The State’s Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Petition for Writ of Mandamus is granted.

16765
`[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43262-43264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21621]



[[Page 43261]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part IV





Office of Management and Budget





_______________________________________________________________________



Line Item Veto Act; Cancellation of Items: Balanced Budget Act of 1997 
and Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997; Notices

  Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 155 / Tuesday, August 12, 1997 / 
Notices  

[[Page 43262]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Cancellation Pursuant to Line Item Veto Act; Balanced Budget Act 
of 1997

August 11, 1997.
    Dear Mr. President: In accordance with the Line Item Veto Act, I 
hereby cancel one item of new direct spending, as specified in the 
attached report, contained in the ``Balanced Budget Act of 1997'' 
(Public Law 105-33; H.R. 2015). I have determined that this 
cancellation will reduce the Federal budget deficit, will not impair 
any essential Government functions, and will not harm the national 
interest. This letter, together with its attachment, constitutes a 
special message under section 1022 of the Congressional Budget and 
Impoundment Control Act of 1974, as amended.
        Sincerely,
William J. Clinton.

The Honorable Albert Gore, Jr.,
President of the Senate,
Washington, D.C. 20510.
      
      
August 11, 1997

    Dear Mr. Speaker: In accordance with the Line Item Veto Act, I 
hereby cancel one item of new direct spending, as specified in the 
attached report, contained in the ``Balanced Budget Act of 1997'' 
(Public Law 105-33; H.R. 2015). I have determined that this 
cancellation will reduce the Federal budget deficit, will not impair 
any essential Government functions, and will not harm the national 
interest. This letter, together with its attachment, constitutes a 
special message under section 1022 of the Congressional Budget and 
Impoundment Control Act of 1974, as amended.
        Sincerely,
William J. Clinton.

The Honorable Newt Gingrich,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, D.C. 20515.
BILLING CODE 3110-01-M
      

[[Page 43263]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12AU97.001



[[Page 43264]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12AU97.002



[FR Doc. 97-21621 Filed 8-11-97; 5:08 pm]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-C`
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21460]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Columbia River System Operation Review; Signing of 1997 Pacific 
Northwest Coordination Agreement, Record of Decision

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability of Record of Decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as 
amended, Reclamation is issuing this notice to announce the 
availability of a Record of Decision (ROD) which was signed on July 18, 
1997. The ROD documents the decision of the Regional Director of the 
Pacific Northwest Regional Office of the Bureau of Reclamation 
(Reclamation) to sign the 1997 Pacific Northwest Coordination Agreement 
(PNCA). Under this agreement, Reclamation will continue to coordinate 
the power production of its Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS) 
projects with other Federal and non-Federal electric utility systems in 
the Columbia River Basin.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the ROD may be requested from: Regional Director, 
Bureau of Reclamation, Attention: Evelyn Dunbar, Lower Columbia Area 
Office, 825 NE Multnomah Street, Suite 1110, Portland OR 87232-2145; 
telephone (503) 872-2795.
    Copies of the ROD are available for inspection and review at the 
following Reclamation offices:
<bullet> Commissioner's Office, 1849 C Street NW, Room 7627, 
Washington, DC
<bullet> Pacific Northwest Regional Office, 1150 North Curtis Road, 
Boise, Idaho
<bullet> Upper Columbia Area Office, 1917 Marsh Road, Yakima, 
Washington
<bullet> Grand Coulee Power Office, Grand Coulee, Washington
<bullet> Hungry Horse Field Office, Hungry Horse, Montana

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Evelyn Dunbar at (502) 872-2795.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The System Operations Review Final 
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), signed in January 1996, required 
a decision to be made on whether to continue coordinating hydropower 
production with non-Federal parties and, if so, to select a preferred 
alternative to replace the existing PNCA. Reclamation believes that a 
renewed coordination agreement is needed in order to maintain mutually 
beneficial arrangements among the Federal and non-Federal project 
operators to achieve Columbia River treaty benefits and to return the 
Canadian entitlement. The preferred alternative, as described in the 
FEIS, is reflected in the 1997 Pacific Northwest Coordination Agreement 
(1997 PNCA) that has been developed and negotiated by Reclamation and 
the other parties to the existing PNCA. For the purposes of the ROD, 
Reclamation's FCRPS projects include Grand Coulee Dam and Hungry Horse 
Dam.

    Dated: July 31, 1997.
John W. Keys, III,
Regional Director, Pacific Northwest Region.
[FR Doc. 97-21460 Filed 8-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-94-M
#### Danna Marie THOMPSON, a minor by her next friends William D. Saucier, Sr. and Murdess Marie Saucier v. C & J BUY AND SELL, d/b/a Alton Nettles and Charles N. Grice.

No. 49327.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 18, 1977.

James J. Sideris, Gulfport, for appellant.

Graves, Riley & Meadows, Richard B. Graves, II, Gulfport, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Harrison County; Floyd J. Logan, Judge.

Before INZER, P. J., SMITH and BROOM, JJ., and J. C. FEDUCCIA, Commissioner.

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

E. Christopher Abruzzo, Secretary Pennsylvania Department ofEnvironmental Protection Rachel Carson State Office Building P. 0. Box 2063 Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063 Dear Secretary Abruzzo: 

### AUG
- 

## 72014

On July 17, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Pennsylvania Department ofthe Environment pertaining to several infrastructure elements applicable to the 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide NAAQS. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice ofProposed Rulemaking (NPR) action. If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Ruth Knapp, Office of

" Air Program Planning, at (215) 814-2191, or at knapp.ruth@epa.gov. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking. 

### Sincerely,

### !'**~**

# ~£!~**/** Air Protection Division



## ,., t.J Printed on 100% recycled/recyclablepaper with 100% post-consumer fiber andprocess chlorine free. Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2418 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2418

   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain electrical connectors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain electrical connectors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Banana jack         Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        connectors                                                         31/2015.......
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8536.69.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Andrew ALLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. EE-214.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 17, 1977.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Theodore E. Mack, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

RAWLS, Judge.

Andrew Allen was convicted of the crime of burglary of a dwelling and sentenced.

The issue on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in failing to grant appellant’s motion for continuance on the ground that the state had failed to respond to his demand for discovery.

Pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.220, an assistant public defender, who had been appointed to represent Allen, timely filed a written demand upon the prosecuting attorney for all evidence discoverable under said rule. The state failed to respond. Immediately prior to trial Allen, having decided that he desired to represent himself,1 moved for a continuance upon the ground, inter alia: “. . .1 have not been given any kind of evidence, what type of proof they got against me. They say ‘witnesses’. He hasn’t told me whether there is one or more than one. They haven’t explained what kind of evidence.” The trial court, after observing that Allen’s motion was made “when the venire is out here, been duly qualified”, denied the motion for continuance.

This court’s opinion in *Lavigne v. State,*First DCA Case No. EE-365, opinion filed June 1, 1977, not yet reported requires reversal. It is undisputed that the state violated a salient Rule of Criminal Procedure. Failure on the part of a trial court to make a full inquiry under such circumstances mandates a reversal. *Richardson v. State,*246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971).

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

BOYER, C. J., and SMITH, J., concur.

1

. The trial court retained Allen’s appointed counsel as his standby attorney.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21079]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM97-5-30-000]

Trunkline Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

August 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 1, 1997, Trunkline Gas Company 
(Trunkline) tendered for filing its Annual Miscellaneous Revenue 
Flowthrough Surcharge Adjustment in accordance with Section 23 of the 
General Terms and conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1.
    Trunkline states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
Section 23 of the General Terms and Conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1 which requires that at least 30 days prior 
to the effective date of adjustment, Trunkline shall make a filing with 
the Commission to reflect the adjustment, if any, required to 
Trunkline's Base Transportation Rates to reflect the result of the 
Miscellaneous Revenue Flowthrough Surcharge Adjustment. Trunkline 
further states that no adjustment is required to Base Transportation 
Rates.
    Trunkline further states that copies of this filing are being 
served on all affected customers and applicable state regulatory 
agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21079 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          34,819
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  397,924
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,057
<INVENTORY>                                    332,054
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               772,761
<PP&E>                                          59,468
<DEPRECIATION>                                (18,736)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 844,103
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          568,764
<BONDS>                                         69,473
<COMMON>                                         3,313
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     197,447
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   844,103
<SALES>                                      4,670,153
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,672,475
<CGS>                                        4,565,750
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,644,711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,725
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,127
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,764
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,383
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,381
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,381
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.27
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1144 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1144

 To provide military retirement credit for certain service by National 
Guard members performed while in a State duty status immediately after 
              the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2005

 Mrs. Clinton introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide military retirement credit for certain service by National 
Guard members performed while in a State duty status immediately after 
              the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MILITARY RETIREMENT CREDIT FOR CERTAIN SERVICE BY NATIONAL 
              GUARD MEMBERS PERFORMED WHILE IN A STATE DUTY STATUS 
              IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE TERRORIST ATTACKS OF SEPTEMBER 11, 
              2001.

    (a) Retirement Credit.--Service of a member of the Ready Reserve of 
the Army National Guard or Air National Guard described in subsection 
(b) shall be deemed to be service creditable under section 
12732(a)(2)(A)(i) of title 10, United States Code.
    (b) Covered Service.--Service referred to in subsection (a) is 
full-time State active duty service that a member of the National Guard 
performed on or after September 11, 2001, and before October 1, 2002, 
in any of the counties specified in subsection (c) to support a Federal 
declaration of emergency following the terrorist attacks on the United 
States of September 11, 2001.
    (c) Covered Counties.--The counties referred to in subsection (b) 
are the following:
            (1) In the State of New York: Bronx, Kings, New York 
        (boroughs of Brooklyn and Manhattan), Queens, Richmond, 
        Delaware, Dutchess, Nassau, Orange, Putnam, Rockland, Suffolk, 
        Sullivan, Ulster, and Westchester.
            (2) In the State of Virginia: Arlington.
    (d) Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall take effect as of 
September 11, 2001.
                                 <all>
```