alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### D. L. CURLS, as Trustee, Appellant, v. Ernest TEW, Individually and as Trustee, Investment Enterprises, Inc., a Florida Corporation, and Ernest Tew & Associates, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellees.

No. DD-273.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 20, 1977.

*1243Young J. Simmons of Green, Simmons, Green & Hightower, Ocala, for appellant.

Larry G. Turner, Gainesville, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, who was plaintiff in the trial court, brought suit for rescission of a contract for the sale of land, seeking return of the $20,000 binder payment made simultaneously with the execution of the contract. The case went to trial before the judge without a jury. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s presentation of evidence appel-lees moved for an involuntary dismissal pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.420(b) which was granted. This appeal followed.

A motion pursuant to the above-mentioned rule is in the nature of the motion formerly known as a motion for directed verdict. The same law is applicable. If substantial competent evidence has been adduced, though conflicting, which, when considered in the light most favorable to the non-moving party would sustain a judgment in favor of that party then the motion should not be granted. A trial judge may not weigh evidence when ruling on a defendant’s motion pursuant to Rule 1.420(b) following the presentation of a prima facie case by a plaintiff. (See *Tillman v. Baskin,*260 So.2d 509 (Fla.1972) and *Realty Marts, Inc. v. Barlow,*312 So.2d 544 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

Although we have grave doubts as to the correctness of the conclusions of the learned trial judge had the case been in such a posture as to have permitted final determination on the merits, we refrain from addressing the merits at this time and rest our decision instead on the narrow ground of the propriety of the order of involuntary dismissal, which we find and hold was improperly entered because the record clearly reveals substantial competent evidence in support of the claim asserted by the plaintiff.

Reversed and remanded for a trial on the merits.

BOYER, C. J., and McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 144 (Monday, July 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40344-40345]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19734]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER95-19-014]


Northwest Regional Transmission Association; Notice of Filing

July 22, 1997.
    Take notice that on June 13, 1997, Northwest Regional Transmission 
Association tendered for filing a letter

[[Page 40345]]

stating that the Citizens Lehaman Power L.L.C. has changed its name to 
Citizens Power LLC and Puget Power & Light Company has changed its name 
to Puget Sound Energy, Inc.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before July 28, 1997. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-19734 Filed 7-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM IMATRON
INC.'S CONSOLIDATED  CONDENSED  STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED  CONDENSED
BALANCE  SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000720477
<NAME> IMATRON INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,198
<SECURITIES>                                     1,999
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,028
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,876)
<INVENTORY>                                     12,965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,363
<PP&E>                                          10,557
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,657)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,643
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,146
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       121,566
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,643
<SALES>                                         29,891
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,549
<CGS>                                           27,052
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,384
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  68
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,646)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,646)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (940)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,586)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Planar Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 24, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gerald K. Perkel, President, Chief
Executive Officer, and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                                 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/    GERALD K.
PERKEL                         
|    |  | Gerald K. Perkel                                
|    |  | President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director

Date: November 23, 2010
Exhibit 23(b)


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
            --------------------------------------------------------





The Board of Directors
Stewardship Financial Corporation:


We consent to incorporation  by reference in the registration  statement on Form
S-8, pertaining to the Stewardship  Financial Corporation 2006 Stock Option Plan
for Non-Employee  Directors, of our report dated March 29, 2006, relating to the
consolidated   statements  of  financial  condition  of  Stewardship   Financial
Corporation  and  subsidiary  as of December 31, 2005 and 2004,  and the related
consolidated  statements of income,  changes in stockholders'  equity,  and cash
flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period ended  December 31, 2005,
which  report  appears in the  December  31, 2005 Annual  Report on Form 10-K of
Stewardship Financial Corporation.


/s/ KPMG LLP
Short Hills, New Jersey
June 29, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21213]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. OA97-688-000]


Pennsylvania Power & Light Company; Notice of Filing

August 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 14, 1997, Pennsylvania Power & Light 
Company (PP&L) tendered for filing, under Federal Power Act Sections 
205 and 206 and Commission Order No. 888-A, PP&L's transmission tariff 
in compliance with Order No. 888-A and a request for rate change. The 
non-rate terms and conditions of PP&L's tariff conform to the 
Commission's pro forma tariff mandated in Order No. 888-A.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions and protests should be filed on or before August 19, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parities to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21213 Filed 8-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Kerri, William Colbert <BCOLBERT@utah

.gov> 04/17/2006 01:04PM To Kerri Fiedler/P2/R8/USEPA/US@EPA Cynthia Cody/P2/R8/USEPA/US@EPA, Joe Thomas cc <JOETHOMAS@utah.gov> bee Subject Re: Utah Dieseii/M SIP

Inresponse to your request, UDAQ is sending a written response. A copy is attached. Ifyou need any additional information, please let me know

. Thanks! -Bill Bill Colbert Utah Dept ofEnvironmental Quality/Division ofAir Quality Planning Branch/Mobile Source Section P.O. Box 144820 150 North 1950 West SaltLake City, UT 84114-4820 Email: bcolbert@utah.gov Voice: (801) 536-4423 Fax: (801) 536-0085

>>> <Fiedler.Kerri@epamail.epa.gov> 3/13/2006 12:45 PM >>> Hi Bill, This email pertains to Utah's Diesel liM SIP. On January 20, 2005, I provided extensive comments on Utah's Diesel liM SIP, including suggestions on following the Voluntary Mobile Source Emissions Reductions Program (VMEP). On May 2, 2005, EPA commented on the DRAFT PM10 maintenance plans and requested that Utah withdraw the Diesel liM SIP submittal since the PM10 maintenance plans no longerrely on the emission reduction credit from the diesel liMprogram to demonstrate attainment or maintenance ofthePM10 NAAQS. The state's response to EPA's May 2, 2005 comment was that UDEQ continues to seek EPA approval ofthe Diesel liMprogram and SIP. We have further reviewed the Utah Diesel liM SIP submittal and we reiterate that Utah should withdraw this request. This is a quick list ofsome ofthe deficiencies with this SIP: Section XXI 1. The 20% pollution credit in the SIP attributable to the diesel liMprogram is not defendable, and no scientific basis has been provided either in the SIP or its technical appendices. 2. There are no set opacity limits indicated in the SIP

.3. We cannot approve locomotive requirements or idling ordinances. In addition, many ofthe appendices are incomplete and marked DRAFT such as those pertaining to opacity limits, equipment and test specifications, and inspection procedures, and liM cutpoints have yet to be determined. Without the specifics for these elements, the diesel liM submittal is ahollow shell. Furthermore, it is ourunderstanding that Utah County has discontinued its diesel liMprogram. This SIP revision does not appear to meet the basic requirements ofsection 110 ofthe CleanAir Act; nor do we think our approval ofthe revision would even minimally strengthen the SIP. Therefore, we request that Utah withdraw this submittal so that we may avoid unnecessary rulemaking. Please let me know ifyou have any questions, or would like to discuss this further. Sincerely, Kerri Fiedler 303.312.6493

# ~ DAQP·017·06_Attachments.pdf
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Bangladesh [electronicresource].**
 
2002
Mar
Sep
2003
Mar
Oct
2004
Mar
Sep
2005
Jun
 
2007
May
Nov
2008
May
Nov
2009
May
Dec
 
 
SuDoc Number:ID 1.29:B 22/
Item Number:0900-I-20 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000632002
 
October 9, 2019
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 153 (Friday, August 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21124]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:02 a.m. on 
Tuesday, August 5, 1997, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider certain 
corporate, supervisory, and administrative enforcement activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director 
Joseph H. Neely (Appointive), seconded by Director Nicolas P. Restinas 
(Acting Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), concurred in by Ms. 
Leann Britton, acting in the place and stead of Director Eugene A. 
Ludwig (Comptroller of the Currency), and Acting Chairman Andrew C. 
Hove, Jr., that Corporation business required its consideration of the 
matters on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier 
notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not 
require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public 
observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed 
meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), 
(c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(10) of the ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 
U.S.C. 552b (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii)), and 
(c)(10)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC

    Dated: August 5, 1997.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21124 Filed 8-6-97; 12:39 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
No. 00-6750.

#### Gomez Hernandez *v.*Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Order filed July 31, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00431-CV

____________

JASMINE RICKS, Appellant

V.

QUALITY CARRIERS, INC. & CRAIG L. SMITH, Appellees

On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-17716

O R D E R

The notice of appeal in this case was filed May 7, 2014. To date, the filing 

fee of $195.00 has not been paid. On June 4, 2014, appellant filed an affidavit of 

indigence in this court. On June 9, 2014, appellees filed a contest to appellant’s 

affidavit. On June 13, 2014, the Harris County District Clerk filed a contest to 

appellant’s affidavit. On June 17, 2014, this court abated the appeal and referred 

the contests to the trial court to determine whether appellant is entitled to appeal 

without advanced payment of costs. On July 11, 2014, the trial court held a 
hearing, sustained the contests, and ordered appellant to pay costs of appeal. On 

July 21, 2014, the trial court signed an order in which it found appellant was not 

entitled to proceed without advanced payment of costs.

The appeal is reinstated. Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the 

amount of $195.00 to the clerk of this court on or before August 15, 2014. See

Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with 

this order, the appeal will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM
#### Frances Joann Hill HIGGINS and Phillip Higgins v. Matthew G. JOHNSON et al.

No. 60716.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 14, 1977.

In re: Frances Joann Hill Higgins and Phillip Higgins applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, East Baton Rouge Parish. 349 So.2d 918.

Writ denied.
EX-10.2



 





Exhibit 10.2




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED SEVERANCE AGREEMENT




     AMENDMENT NO. 1 (the “Amendment”), dated as of November 6, 2007, to that certain AMENDED AND
RESTATED SEVERANCE AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) by and between Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) and Ralph del Campo (“Executive”) dated as of May 7, 2004.



     The undersigned parties hereby desire to amend the Agreement in the manner set forth herein.
All capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to
such terms in the Agreement.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements contained herein
and for other good and valuable consideration the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the
undersigned hereby agree as follows:



1. Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting subsection (c) in its entirety and
inserting in lieu thereof the following:




	 	 	“in the event of a Change in Control defined in Section 7(c)(i)-(vi),
Executive shall receive cash payments equal to TWO (2) TIMES the sum of
the following: (i) his or her Base Salary at the time of such termination
and (ii) the Target Bonus (based on the Base Salary immediately prior to
such termination) for the fiscal year in which such termination occurs;”





2. Except as expressly amended, modified and supplemented hereby, the provisions of the Agreement
are and will remain in full force and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above
written.



	 	 	 
	RALPH DEL CAMPO	 	ENZON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
	 	 	 
	/s/
Ralph del Campo 

	 	By: /s/ Jeffrey H. Buchalter
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 
	Name: Ralph del Campo

Title: Executive Vice President, Technical Operations

	 	Name: Jeffrey H. Buchalter

Title: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
See T EX . R. A PP . P

. 52. 8( d) ( “ W hen deny i ng r el i ef , t he cour t m ay han d do w n an opi ni on b ut 1 i s n o t r e q u i re d to d o s o .”) ; T EX . R. A PP . P . 4 7 .4 (d i s ti n g u i s h i n g o p i n i o n s a n d m e m o ra n d u m o p i n i o n s ). 

### NUM BER 13-0 9-62 8-CR 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG IN RE: ISA

AC DUA NE WHITE On Petit ion fo r Writ of M an da mus . 

### MEM ORA NDU M OPI NI ON Be fo re Ju stice s Y añ ez, B en av ide s, an d Vela Per Curia m M emor andum Opini on 1 Rel ator , I saac

D uane W hit e, pro se, fil ed a peti ti on for w ri t of mandamus i n the abov e c ause on N ov ember 19, 2009, by

w hic h he re q uest s t hisC our t t o c ompel the re spond ent, presi din g j udg e of the 377th Di str ict C our t in Victor ia, T ex as, to hol d a hear ing on hi s mot ion for D NA

tes ti ng i n tr ial co urt c ause number 93- 2- 15. Acc ordin g to re lat or , t he requeste d test ing i s mat erial and w ill esta blish his inno cence . Relator has not prov ided this Cou rtw it h a c opy

of hismoti on. Ma ndamus re li ef may be g ra nted if the re lat or sh ows t hat: ( 1) the actso ug ht t o beS ee D el eo n v . D is t

. C lerk , 1 8 7 S .W .3 d 4 7 3 , 4 7 4 (T e x . C rim . A p p . 2 0 0 6 ) (o rig . p ro c e e d i n g ). 2 See id. 3 See id. 4 See T EX . C OD E C R IM . P ROC . A NN . art

. 64

. 03 (a) (V ern on S up p. 20 09 ). 5 See id. ; R i v e ra v . S ta te , 89 S

. W

. 3d 55 , 58 -59 (T ex . C ri m . A pp . 20 02 ). 6 See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52

. 8(a ). 7 2 c o m p e ll e d is p u re ly m in is t e ri a l; a n d ( 2 ) t h e re i s n o a d e qu a t e re m e d y a tla w. The rela tor 2 must hav e a “ cl ear

r ig ht” to the reli ef soug ht an d the mer it s of t h e rel ief s oug ht mus t be “beyond disp ute .” “ T he requirem ent of a clear legal rig ht ne cessitat es tha t the law plainly 3 desc ri bes the d uty

to be per

formed s uch that there i s n o room for t he exerci se of dis creti on.” 4 To obtai n D NA

tes ti ng under

ch apter 64 of the c ode of cr imi nal procedu re , s ev eral re q uirements mus t b e m e t, i n cludi ng that : (1 ) “t he ev ide nce . . . sti ll ex is ts and i s i n a condi ti on mak ing D NA

testi ng possi ble ”; (2)“id enti ty w as or i s a n i ss ue i n the ca se; ” and (3 ) “t he c onv icted p erson est abl is hes by a preponderance of the evid e n ce that

. . . the p e rso n wo u ld no t h a ve b e e n c o n vict e d if excu lp a to ry res u lt s h a d be e n ob ta in e d th ro u gh DN A te sti ng .” Not hin g in arti cl e 64. 03 req uires a hear ing of any so rtco ncer nin g the tr ial 5 co u rt ’s d e te rm in a ti o n of w h e th e r a d e fe n d a n t is en ti tl e d to DNAte st in g. 6 T he Cou rt, having examine d an d f ully conside red the petitio n for w rit of man dam us, isof the o pin ion thatr e la to r h as not s how n hi msel f entit led to the reli ef soug ht. Accordin gly , the petitio n for w rit of man dam us is D ENIED. 7

PERC UR IAM Do not p ubl is h. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 47. 2(b). Del iv ered and filed the 2 4th d ay

of November , 200 9.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 HALIFAX CORPORATION CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 This Certification is intended to accompany the Annual Report of Halifax
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements
of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The undersigned, in my capacity as set forth
below, hereby certifies, with respect to the Report, that:  1
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document. /s/Joseph Sciacca
Joseph Sciacca
    
    Date: June 14, 2004Chief Financial Officer
No. 00-740.

#### Aerovias de Mexico, S. A. de C. V., dba Aeromexico *v.*Prevoisin et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.