4366 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 19 / Wednesday, January 29, 1997 / Notices

88–20. Volume 2, Part 2–5 provides an

in-depth discussion of the insights and

findings summarized in Volume 1, Part

1. In addition, the NRC staff will

conduct a public workshop (April 7, 8,

9, 1997) to discuss the contents of the

draft NUREG and to solicit comments

(See FR notices 61 FR 58429 and 61 FR

65248). In response to requests for

additional time to comment, the

deadline for public comments on the

draft NUREG–1560 is postponed for one

month to March 14, 1997, and any

additional public comments after the

workshop are due within 30 days of the

workshop, by May 9, 1997.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Draft

NUREG–1560 (Volume 1, Part 1 and

Volume 2, Parts 2–5) is available for

inspection and copying for a fee at the

NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L

Street N.W. (Lower Level), Washington

DC 20555–0001. A free single copy of

Draft NUREG–1560, to the extent of

supply, may be requested by writing to

Distribution Series, Printing and Mail

Services Branch, Office of

Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, DC 20555–

0001.

Since there is a wealth of information

in the draft NUREG–1560 which

provides in-depth discussions on

insight findings, the staff recognizes that

the public may need extra time to

review the draft NUREG and provide

relevant comments on the accuracy of

the reported results in the IPEs and the

appropriateness of the interpretation of

the results. In addition, some IPEs/PRAs

have been modified and may have an

impact on the perspectives discussed in

the draft NUREG. Therefore, the

deadline for public comments has been

extended from February 14, 1997 to

March 14, 1997, and any additional

public comments after the workshop are

due within 30 days of the workshop, by

May 9, 1997.

Mail comments on Draft NUREG–

1560 (Volumes 1 and 2) by March 14,

1997 to Branch Chief, Rules Review and

Directive Branch, Office of

Administration, MS: T6-D59, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC 20555–0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Edward Chow, Office of Nuclear

Regulatory Research, MS T10E50, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC 20555, (301) 415–6571.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 21st day

of January 1997.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Mark Cunningham,

Chief, Probabilistic Risk Analysis Branch,

Division of Systems Technology, Office of

Nuclear Regulatory Research.

[FR Doc. 97–2163 Filed 1–28–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

Request for Public Comment

Upon Written Request, Copies Available

From: Securities and Exchange Commission,

Office of Filings and Information Services,

Washington, DC 20549.

Extension:

Rule 30a–1; File No. 270–210; OMB

Control No. 3235–0219

Form N–54A; File No. 270–182; OMB

Control No. 3235–0237

Form N–54C; File No. 270–184; OMB

Control No. 3235–0236

Form N–6F; File No. 270–185; OMB

Control No. 3235–0238

Notice is hereby given that pursuant

to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities

and Exchange Commission

(‘‘Commission’’) is publishing the

following summaries of collections for

public comment.

Form N–54A [17 CFR 274.53] is the

notification of election to be regulated

as a business development company.

The annual burden is about .5 hours per

respondent.

Form N–54C [17 CFR 274.54] is used

to notify the Commission that a

company withdraws its election to be

regulated as a business development

company. The annual burden is about 1

hour per respondent.

Form N–6F [17 CFR 274.15] permits

a company that has lost its exclusion

from the Investment Company Act of

1940 because it intends to make a public

offering as a business development

company, but is not ready to file Form

N–54A, to remain exempt from the Act

for up to 90 days. The annual burden is

about .5 hour per respondent.

Rule 30a–1 [17 CFR 270.30a–1]

requires every registered investment

company to file a semi-annual report

with the Commission. The burden of

meeting the requirement of this rule is

the burden of filing Form N–SAR, the

reporting form prescribed under the

rule. Approval for Form N–SAR has

been given separately.

The estimates of burden hours set

forth above are made solely for the

purposes of the Paperwork Reduction

Act and are not derived from a

comprehensive or even representative

survey or study of the cost of SEC rules

and forms.

Written comments are invited on: (a)

whether the proposed collection of

information is necessary for the proper

performance of the functions of the

agency, including whether the

information shall have practical utility;

(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate

of the burden of the proposed collection

of information; (c) ways to enhance the

quality, utility, and clarity of the

information to be collected; and (d)

ways to minimize the burden of the

collection of information on

respondents, including through the use

of automated collection techniques or

other forms of information technology.

Consideration will be given to

comments and suggestions submitted in

writing within 60 days of this

publication.

Direct your written comments to

Michael E. Bartell, Associate Executive

Director, Office of Information

Technology, Securities and Exchange

Commission, 450 5th Street, NW.,

Washington, DC 20549.

Dated: January 15, 1997.

Margaret H. McFarland,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–2098 Filed 1–28–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010–01–M

[File No. 1–12546]

Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application

to Withdraw From Listing and

Registration (Pacific Gulf Properties

Inc., Common Stock, $.01 Par Value)

January 23, 1997.

Pacific Gulf Properties Inc.

(‘‘Company’’) has filed an application

with the Securities and Exchange

Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant

to Section 12(d) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) and Rule

12d2–2(d) promulgated thereunder, to

withdraw the above specified security

(‘‘Security’’) from listing and

registration on the American Stock

Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Amex’’).

The reasons alleged in the application

for withdrawing the Security from

listing and registration include the

following:

According to the Company, it has

complied with Rule 18 of the Amex by

filing with such Exchange a certified

copy of preambles and resolutions

adopted by the Company’s Board of

Directors authorizing the withdrawal of

its securities from listing on the Amex

and by setting forth in detail to such

Exchange the reasons for such proposed

withdrawal, and the facts in support

thereof. The Security of the Company

has been listed on the New York Stock

Exchange, Inc. (‘‘NYSE’’) as of October