alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- Directorate Identifier:

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then ou t of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

cost

(@$8 5 / h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Inspection and

installation 5.0 $ 425.00 $25,640 $ 26,065.00 7 $ 182,455.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0. 00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance: 

### 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 182,455



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### 0

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 

### 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.0 0 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be u sed to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specif ic requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
#### Betty Diane POWELL, as Administratrix of the Estate of Desmond Lamar Hawthorne, Deceased, Appellant, v. W. L. COBB CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, and Aetna Life & Casualty Co., the City of Daytona Beach, Florida, a Municipal Corporation, and the State of Florida Department of Transportation, Appellees.

No. FF-105.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 1, 1977.

Rehearing Denied March 7, 1978.

Aaron A. Green, Gainesville, for appellant.

Alfred A. Green, Jr., James 0. Eubank, Daytona Beach, Jerrold K. Phillips, Tallahassee, Frank B. Gummey, III, Daytona Beach, and Winifred Sheridan Smallwood, Tallahassee, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Upon considering the briefs and the record, we find no reversible error.

Accordingly, the order appealed is affirmed.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MILLS, JJ., concur.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING DENIED

MILLS, Judge.

Powell sued several defendants in Volusia County, among them being the Department of Transportation and the City of Daytona Beach. The Department asserted its privilege of being sued in Leon County. The trial court granted the Department’s motion to abate for improper venue and ordered “that further prosecution of this cause is abated pending its transfer to the Circuit Court of Leon County, Florida.”

Interlocutory appeal was taken to this Court and we affirmed per curiam. Powell has now filed a petition for rehearing suggesting that to allow both the Department and the City to assert their venue privilege will require two independent trials. The action against the Department would be tried in Leon County and the action against the City would be tried in Volusia County. Powell contends this would cause a number of complex problems.

The record reflects that all of the other defendants were notified of the hearing on the Department’s motion to abate for improper venue and were furnished copies of the trial court’s order which abated further prosecution of the cause in Volusia County pending its transfer to the Circuit Court of Leon County, Florida. There were no objections by any defendant to the order.

The record reflects that notice of interlocutory appeal, as well as copies of all subsequent pleadings, was served on all of the defendants who were made parties to the appeal. None of the defendants, except the Department, participated in the appeal or argument on petition for rehearing.

We deny the petition for rehearing. The problem suggested by Powell will not arise because the trial court, without objection, from defendants transferred the cause, including all parties, to the Circuit Court of Leon County, Florida.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER, J., concur.
#### Robert Devor CAMPBELL, Jr. v. TOWN & COUNTRY MOBILE HOMES OF MISSISSIPPI and Insurance Company of North America.

No. 50558.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 5, 1978.

Carnathan & Davidson, Gary L. Carna-than, Tupelo, for appellant.

B. L. Riddick, Jackson, for appellees.

Before SUGG, WALKER and COFER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
No. 99-7883.

#### Lawwell *v.*Ohio.

Ct. App. Ohio, Franklin County. Certiorari denied.
#### Joyce Aldan DEAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. HH-38.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 25, 1978.

Rehearing Denied March 13, 1978.

Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, and David J. Busch and Gary M. Delohery, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Michael H. Davidson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Information charged that the Appellant committed aggravated child abuse, Section 827.03(2), Florida Statutes (1975), upon her five year old granddaughter. Following a jury trial, Appellant was convicted of battery, a lesser included offense of the crime charged. Appellant appeals the judgment of conviction and sentence.

A material witness at the trial was the five year old victim. After an extensive voir dire of the child by the court, the State and the Appellant, the court, within the bounds of his discretion, determined that the child was competent to testify, noting that the child understood the obligation to tell the truth.

Appellant raises the objection that the child testified without being administered the witness oath.1 We find this objection cannot be raised for the first time on appeal *131where such fact was known to the Appellant early enough so that a timely objection could have been made. *Beausoliel v. United States,*71 U.S.App.D.C. 111, 107 F.2d 292 (1939).

Finding no other reversible error, we affirm the judgment and sentence.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

1

. We recognize that § 90.605(2), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1976), effective July 1, 1978, Ch. 77-77, Laws of Florida (1977), specifically provides that: “In the court’s discretion, a young child may testify without taking the oath if the court determines the child understands the duty to tell the truth.”
Exhibit 32.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Jagged Peak, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the 13-week period ended March 30, 2007, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 10, 2007
|                   | 
|By:                |  | /s/Andrew J. Norstrud  
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# McNamara HQC promotes Family Day fun and safety

By Chris Erbe

The annual event promotes workforce resiliency and features games, movies, crafts, rides and other activities for kids and family members. A short list of activities included a fun run/walk, line dance classes, bingo, karaoke, paddle-boat rides, rock-wall climbing and pony rides. MWR brought in 12 caricature artists, who attracted long lines of people waiting to see their likeness. Also popular, especially among the kids, were the temporary-tattoo artists and the photo booth.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

FamilyPeople and CultureResiliency
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

      In   connection   with  the   Quarterly   Report  on  Form  10-Q  of  eLEC
Communications Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ended February 28, 2006, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  Paul H. Riss, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company,  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Registrant.


Date:  April 14, 2006                          By:  /s/ Paul H. Riss
                                                    --------------------
                                                    Paul H. Riss
                                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



      This  certification  accompanies  each  Report  pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                       21
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA results on federal survey show favorable employee opinions of agency  

By Kathleen T. RhemDLA Public Affairs

                FORT BELVOIR, Virginia  –              Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey2015-2022 DLA Strategic Plan

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

employee opinionsfederal employee viewpoint surveyPeople and Culturefederal survey
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Hudson Valley Holding Corp. (the
Company) for the year ending December 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Stephen R. Brown, Senior
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and result of operations of the Company.



| |                                 
| | --------------------------------
| | /s/ STEPHEN R. BROWN            
| |                                 
| | Stephen R. Brown                
| | Senior Executive Vice President,
| | Chief Financial Officer and     
| | Treasurer                       

Dated: March 13, 2006
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      Exhibit 23

                         Consent of Independent Auditors
                         -------------------------------

             We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 Number 33-11335) pertaining to the McDonald & Company
Investments, Inc. Stock Option Plan, Registration Statement (Form S-8 Number
33-37603) pertaining to the McDonald & Company Investments, Inc. 1990 Stock
Option Plan for Outside Directors, Registration Statement (Form S-8 Number
33-54521) pertaining to the McDonald & Company Investments, Inc. 1993 Stock
Bonus Plan, Registration Statement (Form S-8 Number 33-65491) pertaining to the
McDonald & Company Investments, Inc. 1995 Stock Bonus Plan, and Registration
Statement (Form S-8 Number 33-65489) pertaining to the McDonald & Company
Investments, Inc. 1995 Key Employees Stock Option Plan, of our report dated May
6, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of McDonald &
Company Investments, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
fiscal year ended March 28, 1997.

                                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
June 18, 1997

                                     - 32 -
Appendix D Emissions Preparation and ResultsAppendix D.1 Emissions Inventory Quality Assurance Project PlanAppendix D.2a Emissions Inventory Documentation

Point Source EI DocumentationAppendix D.2b

Mobile and Area SourcesAppendix D.3 Emissions Inventory Summaries

VISTAS BASE 2G ANNUAL EMISSION SUMMARIESAppendix D.4 Emissions Modeling DocumentationAppendix D.4b Temporal Profile Development for Electric Generating UnitsAppendix D.5 VISTAS Emission Inventory

Supporting DocumentationAppendix D.6 TDEC-APC Emission Inventory Supporting Documentation
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries IV, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 2, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries IV, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1285 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1285

To designate the Federal building located at 333 Mt. Elliott Street in 
       Detroit, Michigan, as the ``Rosa Parks Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2005

Ms. Stabenow (for herself and Mr. Levin) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building located at 333 Mt. Elliott Street in 
       Detroit, Michigan, as the ``Rosa Parks Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 333 Mt. Elliott Street in Detroit, 
Michigan, shall be known and designated as the ``Rosa Parks Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Rosa Parks Federal 
Building''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of GoldSpring, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert T. Faber, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/  ROBERT T. FABERRobert T. FaberChief Financial Officer May 13, 2005
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Balchem  Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period  ended March 31,  2007 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Dino A. Rossi,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Dino A. Rossi
Dino A. Rossi
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

May 10, 2007

This certification  accompanies the above-described Report on Form 10-Q pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the
extent  required  by such Act, be deemed  filed by the  Company for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



                                       34
#### Ex parte CLEGG MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.

SC 2286.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 3, 1977.

FAULKNER, Justice.

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

All the Justices concur.