Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 1997 / Notices 41045

provides for the rates and charges for

Non-Firm Transmission Service.

In its filing, KCPL states that the rates

included in the above-mentioned

Service Agreement are KCPL’s rates and

charges in the compliance filing to

FERC Order No. 888 in Docket No.

OA96–4-000.

Comment date: August 8, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

23. Southern Company Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER97–3622–000]

Take notice that on July 7, 1997,

Southern Company Services, Inc. (SCS),

acting on behalf of Alabama Power

Company, Georgia Power Company,

Gulf Power Company, Mississippi

Power Company, and Savannah Electric

and Power Company (collectively

referred to as Southern Companies) filed

a service agreement for network

integration transmission service

between SCS, as agent for Southern

Companies, and Southern Wholesale

Energy, a Department of SCS, as agent

for Mississippi Power Company, under

Part III of the Open Access

Transmission Tariff of Southern

Companies.

Comment date: August 8, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

24. Houston Lighting & Power Company

[Docket No. ER97–3616–000]

Take notice that on July 7, 1997,

Houston Lighting & Power Company

(HL&P), tendered for filing an executed

transmission service agreement (TSA)

with NGTS Energy Services (NGTS) for

Non-Firm Transmission Service under

HL&P’s FERC Electric Tariff, Second

Revised Volume No. 1, for Transmission

Service To, From and Over Certain

HVDC Interconnections. HL&P has

requested an effective date of July 7,

1997.

Copies of the filing were served on

NGTS and the Public Utility

Commission of Texas.

Comment date: August 8, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraph

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC

20426, in accordance with Rules 211

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions

or protests should be filed on or before

the comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–20241 Filed 7–30–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Project No. 1494–133]

Grand River Dam Authority; Notice of

Availability of Final Environmental

Assessment

July 25, 1997.

In accordance with the National

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and

the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission’s regulations, 18 CFR Part

380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47910), the

Office of Hydropower Licensing (OHL)

has prepared a final environmental

assessment (FEA) for an application for

approval of a marina expansion. Grand

River Dam Authority proposes to permit

Mr. Terry Frost, d/b/a Cherokee Yacht

Club, to expand an existing marina on

Grand Lake’s Duck Creek. Cherokee

Yacht Club requests permission to add

two covered docks containing 53 boat

slips to an existing marina consisting of

134 slips and 2 gas docks. The proposal

would bring the total number of slips to

187. In the FEA, staff concludes that

approval of the licensee’s proposal

would not constitute a major Federal

action significantly affecting the quality

of the human environment. The

Pensacola Project is on the Grand River,

in Craig, Delaware, Mayes, and Ottawa

counties, Oklahoma.

The FEA was written by staff in the

Office of Hydropower Licensing,

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

Copies of the EA are available for review

at the Commission’s Reference and

Information Center, Room 2–A, 888

First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426.

Additional informational can be

obtained by calling the project manager,

John Estep, at (202) 219–2654.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–20122 Filed 7–30–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

Notice of Non-Project Use of Project

Lands and Waters

July 25, 1997.

Take notice that the following

hydroelectric application has been filed

with the Commission and is available

for public inspection:

a. Type of Application: Non-Project

Use of Project Lands and Waters.

b. Project Name and No: CatawbaWateree Project, FERC Project No. 2232–

331.

c. Date Filed: August 9, 1996, and

supplemented on May 29, 1997.

d. Applicant: Duke Power Company.

e. Location: Mecklenburg, North

Carolina Overlook Subdivision on

Mountain Island Lake near Charlotte.

f. Filed pursuant to: Federal Power

Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)–825(r).

g. Applicant Contact: Mr. E.M.

Oakley, Duke Power Company, P.O. Box

1006 (EC12Y), Charlotte, NC 28201–

1006, (704) 382–5778.

h. FERC Contact: Brian Romanek,

(202) 219–3076.

i. Comment Date: September 18, 1997.

j. Description of the filing: Duke

Power Company proposes to grant an

easement of 5 acres of project land to

Overlook Properties, Inc. to construct a

private residential marina consisting of

180 boat slips. The proposed marina

would provide access to the reservoir

for residents of the Overlook

Subdivision. The proposed marina

facility would consist of an access ramp

and floating slips. The slips would be

anchored by using self-driving piles. In

addition, an area 0.86 acre in size would

be excavated to improve the water depth

for boat access. About 8,800 cubic yards

of material would be removed.

k. This notice also consists of the

following standard paragraphs: B, C1,

D2.

B. Comments, Protests, or Motions to

Intervene—Anyone may submit

comments, a protest, or a motion to

intervene in accordance with the

requirements of Rules of Practice and

Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, 385.211,

385.214. In determining the appropriate

action to take, the Commission will

consider all protests or other comments

filed, but only those who file a motion

to intervene in accordance with the

Commission’s Rules may become a

party to the proceeding. Any comments,

protests, or motions to intervene must

be received on or before the specified

comment date for the particular

application.