alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Non Invasive Monitoring, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending July 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Genzler, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: November 9, 2005
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# HQC employees train to help evacuate coworkers with mobility challenges

By Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Daniel Garas DLA Public Affairs

                FORT BELVOIR, Virginia  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

TrainingDLA Installation SupportPeople and Culture
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NOS. WR-95,617-01 & WR-95,617-02

EX P ARTE ADAM SANCHEZ , Applicant

ON AP P LICATIONS F OR WRITS OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NOS. 2017CR9179-W1 & 2017CR9174-W1 IN THE 226TH DISTRICT COURT F ROM BEXAR COUNTY

Per curiam . Y E A R

Y , J ., f iled a dissenting opinion in w hich K E L L E R , P .J., joined. O P I N I O N Under a plea ag reement, Applicant w as convicted o f two ag g ravated sex ual assault of a child offenses involving h is biolog ical son a nd daug hter. He was sentenced to twenty
- five y ears’ imprisonment in e ach case, to run concurrently

. He d id n ot a ppeal his convictions. A pplicant filed these applications f

or writs of habeas c orpus in the c ounty o f conviction, a nd th e d i s t r i ct clerk forwarded them to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends that (1) h e is actually innocent b ecause the complainants h ave recanted and (2) his p l e a s were involuntary due to the ineffective assistance o f counsel. The trial court conducted a live evidentiary hearing , at w hich the complainants testified. The trial court found the2

complainants’ recantations credible a nd recommends that the Court g rant Applicant relief on actual innocence grounds. The record supports the trial court’s finding s and recommendation. Relief i s gr a n t ed

. Ex parte Elizondo , 947 S.W .2d 202 (Tex

. Crim. A pp. 1996); Ex parte Tuley , 1 09 S.W .3d 388 (Tex

. Crim. App. 2002). The judg ments in c ause numbers 2017CR9179 and 2017CR9174 in the 226th District Court of B ex a r County are set aside, and A pplicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of B ex ar C o u n t y t o a nswer the charg e s as set out in the indictments. The trial court shall issue any necessary b ench w arrant within ten day s from the date o f this Court’s mandate. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the T e x as Dep a r t m e n t o f C r i m i n a l Ju s t ice–Correctional I nstitutions Division and the B oard of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: J une 19, 2024 Do not publish
#### Willie James POPE v. STATE.

7 Div. 410.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Oct. 21, 1975.

Wilson, Propst & Isom, Anniston, for appellant.

No brief for the State.

BOOKOUT, Judge.

First Degree Murder. Sentence: Life Imprisonment.

The appellant was convicted July 31, 1975, and filed notice of appeal. Sentence was not suspended pending appeal. Pope was adjudged an indigent both at trial and on appeal. The trial court directed the court reporter to prepare an original transcript and three copies and estimated the court reporter’s fee to be $400, pursuant to Section 7, Act No. 525, Acts of Alabama 1963, approved September 16, 1963 [Title 15, Section 380(20)].

The case was submitted to this Court on the record proper without the court reporter’s transcript of the evidence. Counsel for appellant has filed a motion entitled, “MOTION TO REMAND OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO REVERSE THE INSTANT CONVICTION AND REMAND FOR A NEW TRIAL.”

The Circuit Clerk’s certificate,1 in part, reads as follows:

> “I further certify that on July 31, 1975 the Court ordered a free transcript of Record and Evidence and Court appointed Appellant Counsel (Jack Wilson) for Defendant.

> I further certify that *No*Transcript of Evidence has to date been filed by Court *1382Reporter (Paul Williams) with undersigned *Clerk*— and—No Order of extension for preparing Transcript of Evidence has been filed of Record with said Clerk.”

An indigent’s right to appeal cannot be thwarted by inaction on the part of the court reporter. *Brooks v. State,*283 Ala. 459, 218 So.2d 271 (1968); *Griffin v. Illinois,*351 U.S. 12, 76 S.Ct. 585, 100 L.Ed. 891 (1956); *Draper v. Washington,*372 U.S. 487, 83 S.Ct. 774, 9 L.Ed.2d 899 (1963).

It is the opinion of the Court that this cause should be remanded with directions to the trial court to correct the record so as to include a transcript of the evidence. The transcript of the evidence should be filed with the Circuit Clerk below within 60 days from this date, unless that period be extended by the trial court for cause, pursuant to statute. A complete record shall be filed with this Court by the Circuit Clerk, upon receipt of the court reporter’s transcript, as provided by law.

Remanded with directions.

All the Judges concur.

1

. It is noted in paragraph 2 of the Clerk’s certificate that the offense is incorrectly stated. Since a new Clerk’s certificate will be necessary after remandment, we call the Circuit Clerk’s attention to that apparent clerical error.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1273 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1273

To provide for the sale and adoption of excess wild free-roaming horses 
                              and burros.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 20, 2005

   Mr. Reid introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the sale and adoption of excess wild free-roaming horses 
                              and burros.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros 
Sale and Adoption Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. SALE AND ADOPTION OF WILD FREE-ROAMING HORSES AND BURROS.

    Section 3 of Public Law 92-195 (16 U.S.C. 1333) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(2)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``: Provided'' 
                and all that follows through ``adopting party''; and
                    (B) by striking subparagraph (C) and inserting the 
                following:
                    ``(C) Additional excess wild free-roaming horses 
                and burros for which an adoption demand by qualified 
                individuals does not exist shall be sold under 
                subsection (e).'';
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``not more than four 
        animals'' and inserting ``excess animals transferred'';
            (3) in subsection (e)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by striking subparagraph (A) 
                and inserting the following:
                    ``(A) the Secretary determines that there is no 
                adoption demand from qualified individuals for the 
                excess animal;'';
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``without 
                limitation''; and
                    (C) by striking paragraph (4) and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(4) Effect of sale.--At the end of the 1-year period 
        following the sale of any excess animal under this subsection--
                    ``(A) the Secretary shall grant to the transferee 
                title to the excess animal; and
                    ``(B) the excess animal transferred shall no longer 
                be considered to be a wild free-roaming horse or burro 
                for purposes of this Act.''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f) Minimum Fees and Bids.--The minimum adoption fee required for 
the adoption of an excess animal under this section shall be $25.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Ex parte PERSONNEL BOARD OF MOBILE COUNTY, Alabama, and City of Mobile, Alabama, a Municipal Corp.

77-207.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Jan. 27, 1978.

BEATTY, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES and SHORES, JJ., concur.
No. 99-6807.

#### Huerta *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### William S. MADDOX v. SOUTHERN CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. et al.

No. 60569.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 27, 1977.

In re: William S. Maddox applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of LaSalle. 348 So.2d 685.

Writ denied.
# C_2014261EN.01000801.xml

| 11.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/8

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2014 — Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) v Sanco, SA

(Case C-411/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Figurative mark representing a chicken - Opposition of the proprietor of a national figurative mark representing a chicken - Partial rejection of the opposition))

2014/C 261/12

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Sanco, SA (represented by: A. Segura Roda, abogado)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.

1

---
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2297 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to make any substance containing 

hydrocodone a schedule II drug. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 18, 2012 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself, Mr. KIRK, and Mrs. GILLIBRAND) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to make any 

substance containing hydrocodone a schedule II drug. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HYDROCODONE AMENDMENT. 

4 Schedule III(d) in section 202 of the Controlled Sub5 stances Act (21 U.S.C. 812) is amended by— 

6 (1) striking paragraphs (3) and (4); and 

7 (2) redesignating paragraphs (5), (6), (7), and 

8 (8) as paragraphs (3), (4), (5), and (6), respectively. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

Certification of President



I, Ramon Chimelis, President, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Big Sky Industries IV, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: February 4, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 21

                      Subsidiaries of Guest Supply, Inc.
                      ----------------------------------

         Guest Supply, Inc. has the following subsidiaries:

         1.  Guest International, Ltd., an English corporation.

         2.  Guest Packaging, Inc., a New Jersey corporation.

         3.  Breckenridge-Remy Co., a Delaware corporation.

         4.  Guest International (Canada) Ltd., a Canadian corporation.

         5.  Guest International New Zealand Limited, a New Zealand corporation.

         6.  Guest Distribution Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

         7.  MacDonald Contract Sales, a Canadian Corporation

         8.  TJ MacDonald Institutional Textiles, LTD., a Canadian Corporation
             (Acquired October 31, 2000)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1192 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1192

To amend section 51 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the 
    eligibility for the work opportunity tax credit to all disabled 
                               veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 7, 2005

  Mr. Salazar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 51 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the 
    eligibility for the work opportunity tax credit to all disabled 
                               veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Warm Welcome Home Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) The work opportunity tax credit is a $2,400 tax credit 
        to encourage employers to hire several different types of job 
        seekers, including certain veterans.
            (2) The work opportunity tax credit has been a valuable 
        tool for assisting veterans and has helped bring many out of 
        poverty.
            (3) The work opportunity tax credit is limited to veterans 
        who are--
                    (A) receiving food stamps; or
                    (B) physically or mentally disabled and who are 
                going through or have completed vocational 
                rehabilitation training.

SEC. 3. WORK OPPORTUNITY TAX CREDIT.

    (a) Expansion of Eligibility to All Disabled Veterans.--Section 
51(d)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``who is certified'' and inserting the 
        following: ``who--
                            ``(i) is certified''; and
            (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting the 
        following: ``; or
                            ``(ii) has a disability rating under 
                        section 1155 of title 38, United States Code, 
                        of not less than 10 percent.''.
    (b) Publication and Administration of Expanded Tax Credit.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary of Labor shall--
                    (A) publicize the expansion of the work opportunity 
                tax credit under subsection (a); and
                    (B) provide technical assistance to employers 
                desiring to take advantage of the tax credit.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There are authorized 
        to be appropriated to the Secretary of Labor $2,500,000 for 
        each of fiscal years 2006 through 2010 to carry out paragraph 
        (1).
                                 <all>
```
#### Ex parte STATE of Alabama ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL.

No. 77-125.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 2, 1977.

BEATTY, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES and SHORES, JJ., concur.
Amendment to the Briggs & Stratton Corp



 Exhibit 10.8 
 BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION 
 Form 10-Q for Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2007

 AMENDMENT TO THE BRIGGS & STRATTON 
 CORPORATION ECONOMIC VALUE ADDED 
 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN 
 Effective January 1, 2008 







 WHEREAS, the Committee has established and administers the Briggs & Stratton Corporation
Economic Value Added Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) pursuant to the shareholder-approved Briggs & Stratton Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, it is necessary to make certain amendments to the Plan for purposes of compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code;

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, that the Plan is amended in the following respects effective January 1, 2008: 
  

	 	1.	The phrase “on or before the end of the second month following” in paragraphs A and B of Article VIII of the Plan is replaced with the phrase “during the 60 day
period following”. 

  

	 	2.	A new paragraph E is added to Article X to read as follows: 

  

	 	E.	Section 409A. To facilitate compliance with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, a payment otherwise required to be paid under this Plan shall be neither accelerated
nor deferred nor shall there otherwise be a change in the time at which any payment due hereunder is to be paid, except pursuant to a specific written amendment adopted by the Board of Directors of Briggs & Stratton Corporation, which
amendment is consistent with the requirements of applicable regulations under Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. Further, no individual shall be deemed to have a termination of employment for purposes of this Plan unless such termination of
employment also constitutes a separation from service within the meaning of Code Section 409A.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries III, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 2, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries III, Inc.