alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-6.htm


    EXHIBIT
      10.6

     

    NS8
      CORPORATION

    


    AMENDMENT
      NO. 1

    TO
      WARRANT NO. CCP-001

    


    


    THIS
      WARRANT AMENDMENT SHOULD BE ATTACHED TO THE

    ORIGINAL
      WARRANT CERTIFICATE

    


     

    This
      Amendment No. 1 to Warrant (this “Amendment”) is issued in connection with that
      certain Warrant No. CCP-001 (the “Warrant”) issued by NS8 Corporation, (the
“Company”) to Cornell
      Capital Partners, L.P. (the “Holder”), pursuant to which the
      Holder is entitled to purchase from the Company at any time or from time to
      time
      during the period specified the Warrant 5,000,000 shares of the
      Company’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share.

    


    THIS
      CERTIFIES THAT, the following amendments are hereby made to the
      Warrant:

     

    
      	
              ·  

            	
              Pursuant
                to the application of Section 8(a) of the Warrant, the exercise price
                of
                the Warrant is hereby adjusted to be $0.02 per share effective as
                of the
                date hereof.

            


    

     

    


     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be signed by
      its duly authorized officer.

     

    NS8
      CORPORATION


    


    


    
      	
               

            	
               

            	
               

            
	
              Date: July
                20, 2007

            	
              By:  

            	
              /s/ George
                G.
                O’Leary                   
                

            
	
               

            	
              George
                G. O’Leary

            
	
               

            	
              Chief
                Financial Officer

              (Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 152 (Thursday, August 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20869]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 97N-0143]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Citizen Petition'' has been 
approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret R. Wolff, Office of 
Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of April 28, 1997 
(62 FR 22959), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 
section 3507 of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3507). OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0183. 
The approval expires on June 30, 2000. An agency may not conduct or 
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of 
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

    Dated: July 31, 1997.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 97-20869 Filed 8-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 0 2

- 00 748

- CV

Carlos Vasquez

- Hernandes , Appellant

v.
Elodia Vasquez

, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUN TY, 395TH

JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 02

- 1034

- F395 , HONORABLE MICHAEL JERGINS , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

By letter, appellant Carlos Vasquez

- Hernandes informs this Court that he wants to

A withdraw[] from the appeal. @ Accordingly, we will dismiss the appeal.
The appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2).

________________________________________ David Puryea

r, Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear
Dismissed on Appellant =

s MotionFiled: February 21, 2003
#### Robert SILVERTHORNE et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF PORT ORANGE, Florida et al., Appellees.

No. GG-356.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 7, 1978.

Rehearing Denied April 4, 1978.

*37S. LaRue Williams and Thomas S. Hart of Kinsey, Vincent, Pyle & Williams, Dayto-na Beach, for appellants.

Wayne L. Hogeboom of Becks & Becks, Daytona Beach, for appellees.

SMITH, Acting Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from a final judgment dismissing their complaint for a declaration of the invalidity of an annexation ordinance adopted by the City of Port Orange. The ordinance was adopted pursuant to Section 171.044, Florida Statutes (1975), authorizing municipalities to annex contiguous property upon the voluntary petition of the owners. These plaintiffs were among the petitioners for annexation. The trial court held:

> By virtue of Plaintiffs having initiated the adoption of Ordinance 1-30 by joining in the petition for voluntary annexation and by virtue of Plaintiffs’ failure to object to the passage of said ordinance at public hearings concerning said ordinance, and in light of the fact that the City of Port Orange and all petitioners other than Plaintiffs would be unduly prejudiced by Plaintiffs’ failure to object prior to the passage of the ordinance. Plaintiffs are estopped to contest the validity of said ordinance on the alleged grounds of injury to the Plaintiffs.

The judgment is supported by substantial competent evidence received in the non-jury trial. Estoppel may defeat a landowner’s attack on an annexation ordinance. *State ex rel. Landis v. City of Coral Gables,*120 Fla. 492, 163 So. 308 (1935); *Malley v. Clay County Zoning Comm’n, 225*So.2d 555 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969); *MacKinlay v. City of Stuart,*321 So.2d 620 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); *2 E. McQuillin, Municipal Corporations*§ 7.42 (3d ed. 1966). No error appears in the trial court’s application of estoppel principles to the facts in this case. No question was raised in this case concerning the propriety of plaintiffs’ choice of remedy in the circuit court. See § 171.081, Fla.Stat. (1975); *State ex rel. City of Casselberry v. Mager,*356 So.2d 267, (1978).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Raytheon Company ) ASBCA No. 61859

)

Under Contract No. W56HZV

- 11

- C

- 0130 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Kevin P. Connelly, Esq.

Jeffrey M. Lowry, Esq.

Vedder Price P.C.

Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Scott N. Flesch, Esq.

Army Chief Trial Attorney

LTC Abraham Young, JA

Frank A. March, Esq.

Trial Attorneys

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: September 23, 2021

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61859

, Appeal of Raytheon

Company , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: September 23, 2021 MARK A. MELNICK

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of GOLDSPRING, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John
Cook, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respect, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ John Cook
---------------------------
Name: John Cook
Title: Chief Executive Officer and President
Date: June 19, 2003



<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1


                       CERTIFICATION OF THE PRESIDENT

                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    I, Ramon Chimelis, president, treasurer, and secretary, certify that the
forgoing quarterly report on Form 10-QSB containing the financial statements
set forth within fully comply with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)) and that
information contained in the quarterly report presents fairly, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Big
Sky Industries VIII, Inc.

Date: May 20, 2003                  /s/ Ramon Chimelis
                                    --------------------
                                    Ramon Chimelis
                                    President



<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20753]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Monday, August 11, 1997.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:

    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.

    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-3207, beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting.

    Dated: August 1, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-20753 Filed 8-1-97; 4:08 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21469]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. OA97-439-000]


Virginia Electric and Power Company; Notice of Filing

August 8, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 16, 1997, Virginia Electric and Power 
Company tendered for filing an amendment to its July 1, 1997, filing in 
this docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before August 21, 1997. Protests 
filed will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make the 
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21469 Filed 8-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Compensation Letter between the Registrant and Wai M. Wong



 Exhibit 10.8 
  

			
	B E A Systems, Inc 	 	 2315 North First Street
 San Jose, California 95131

 Phone: 408.570.8000
 Fax: 408-570-8901


 

 
 March 22, 2006 
 Wai Wong

 2315 North First St. 
 San Jose, CA. 
 RE:    FY07 Compensation Awards 
 Dear Wai: 

I’m happy to advise that the Compensation Committee has approved the following FY07 Cash and Equity Rewards in recognition of your contributions over the last
fiscal year. 
 Base Salary and Bonus Potential 
 Effective May 1, 2006, your new annual base salary is $464,000, payable in accordance with our regular payroll cycle. This represents an 8% adjustment. Your On-Target-Eamings (OTE) is now $812,000 payable in accordance
with our FY07 Corporate Bonus Plan. The Plan Document for the FY07 Corporate Bonus Plan will be sent under separate cover, however, a modification to the plan includes an annual payout (from the previous semi-annual payout schedule) as well as an
MBO provision for Succession Planning. Please reference the Plan Document for specifics. 
 Equity 
 The Compensation Committee also approved the granting of 165,000 non-qualified stock options (standard 4 year vest) as well as 55,000 Restricted
Stock Units (RSU’s) with a 4 year vest. The options will be priced on the next Unanimous Written Consent at Fair Market Value and you will receive the option and RSU agreements under separate cover. 
 Wai, I deeply appreciate your contributions and look forward to FY07 with optimism and excitement. Thanks for all of your hard work! 
 Sincerely, 
 Alfred
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-51458, No.333-08992, No. 333-38455, No. 333-04609, No. 33-53988, No.
33-19662, No. 2-87376, No. 33-33566, No. 333-91389, of Ault Incorporated and
Subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our report dated July 12, 2002, (July 16, 2002 as to
Note 11) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ault Incorporated and
Subsidiaries for the year ended June 2, 2002.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP



Minneapolis, Minnesota
August 26, 2002















                                       50
No. 99-1082.

#### Crofts, Individually and as Statutory Beneficiary of and Personal Representative of the Estate of Crofts, Deceased *v.*Dallas County Hospital District, dba Parkland Memorial Hospital.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                         CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                       Chase Manhattan Owner Trust 1998-B

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Chase Manhattan
Bank USA, N.A. ("Chase USA"), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing
Agreement dated as of April 1, 1998 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") by and
between Chase USA and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as trustee
(the "Trustee"), does hereby certify that:

         1.       A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period
         from January 1, 2000 until December 31, 2000 was conducted under my
         supervision.

         2.       Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my
         knowledge, fully performed in all material respects all its
         obligations, under the Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout such
         period and no material default in the performance of such obligations
         has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 3 below.

         3.       None.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 26th day of March 2001.

                                                          /s/ Keith Schuck
                                                          ----------------
                                                          Keith Schuck
                                                          Vice President
**Exhibit
      99.1**
















**For
      Release: Monday, December 4, 2006**





**Contact:**  **Douglas
      Stewart, President-CEO**


**Debra Geuy, Chief Financial Officer**








**PEOPLES-SIDNEY
      FINANCIAL CORPORATION ANNOUNCES COMPLETION OF STOCK REPURCHASE
      PROGRAM**





Sidney,
      Ohio OTCBB - “PSFC”





Douglas
      Stewart, President and CEO of Peoples-Sidney Financial Corporation, parent
      company of Peoples Federal Savings and Loan Association, announced today the
      Corporation’s completion of its 5% stock repurchase program.





The
      original repurchase program began on April 19, 2005, was subsequently extended,
      and was completed on November 30, 2006. During this period the Corporation
      repurchased a total of 71,600 shares at a weighted average price of $15.15
      per
      share.





As
      of
      November 30, 2006, Peoples-Sidney Financial Corporation had 1,361,048 in
      outstanding shares.





Peoples
      Federal operates from its main office at 101 E. Court Street and its branch
      offices at 2400 W. Michigan Street (inside Wal Mart), 405 S. Pike Street, Anna,
      Ohio, and 115 E. Pike Street, Jackson Center, Ohio.





When
      used
      in this press release or other public or shareholder communications, in filings
      by the Corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in oral
      statements made with the approval of an authorized executive office, the words
      or phrases “should result,” “will likely result,” “will enable,” “are expected
      to,” “is anticipated,” “estimate,” “project” or similar expressions are intended
      to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private
      Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to certain
      risks and uncertainties, including changes in economic conditions in the
      Corporation’s market area, changes in policies by regulatory agencies,
      fluctuations in interest rates, demand for loans in the Corporation’s market
      area and competition, that could cause actual results to differ materially
      from
      historical results and those presently anticipated or projected. The Corporation
      wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking
      statements, which speak only as of the date made. The Corporation wishes to
      advise readers that the factors listed could affect the Corporation’s financial
      performance and could cause the Corporation’s actual results for future periods
      to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect
      to
      future periods in any current statements.





The
      Corporation does not undertake-and specifically declines any obligation-to
      publicly release the result of any revisions which may be made to any
      forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date
      of
      such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated
      events.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

479 CA 10-02353 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

RICHARD MULLEN, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT,

V ORDER
STATE OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (CLAIM NO. 116118.)

RICHARD MULLEN, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT PRO SE.
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (KATE H. NEPVEU OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Renee Forgensi Minarik, J.), entered August 13, 2010. The order granted the motion of defendant to dismiss the amended claim and dismissed the amended claim.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: April 29, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

 

I, Michael R. Garone, certify that:

 

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Immunomedics, Inc.; and

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: September 18, 2017

 
| /s/  Michael R.   Garone                          |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael R. Garone                                      |   |
| Principal Executive   Officer, Vice President, Finance |   |
| and Chief Financial   Officer                          |   |

 

----
No. 99-7801.

#### Donley *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7391

MICHAEL F. DEHONEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;

PARKER EVATT, Commissioner; CHARLES J. CEPAK,

Warden; PRIS MACK, Deputy Warden individually

and/or in their official capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-94-1902-4-21BE)

Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 6, 1997

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael F. Dehoney, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Crouch Coleman,

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief

on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and denying his motion to

amend the court's order. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Dehoney v. South Carolina Dep't of

Corrections, No. CA-94-1902-4-21BE (D.S.C. Aug. 2, 1996; Aug. 26,

1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.1

Feb. 25, 2003
Tom Puccio
10 Venetian Way
Miami Beach Florida 33139

Dear Mr. Gott,

I hereby accept your offer to become a business consultant for SLS
International, Inc. for a minimum period of one year from today's date, Feb. 25,
2003.

As a consultant for SLS I will introduce your company to my associates in the
entertainment industry and help promote your products to this industry,

It is understood that I shall receive 150,000 shares of SITI Restricted 144
stock upon signing of this agreement and at the end of 6 months from this date
an additional 150,000 shares of SITI Restricted 144 stock will be given to me as
compensation providing I have added real qualified value to SLS equal to or in
excess of the value (based on Feb. 25, 2003) of the first 150,000 shares.

I look forward to a successful relationship with SLS.

Sincerely,



Tom Puccio