alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 2023 Fall - Change your clock, change your battery

By Noah McGee, fire inspector Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Richmond Fire and Emergency Services

                RICHMOND, Va.  –              
The National Fire Protection Association recommends that smoke alarms are activated monthly to ensure that they function as intended.

The bi-annual fire safety campaign "Change Your Clock, Change Your Battery" promotes the need to have working smoke alarms that will give an important early warning signal in the event of a fire.

Remember that fire will not wait. We must always plan our escape. Stay low and crawl under the smoke. Choose an outdoor meeting location. Once you're outside, stay outside.

Smoke alarms save lives!

For more information and helpful safety tips, contact the DLA Richmond Fire and Emergency Services Prevention Office or call 804-279-6782.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA AviationFire SafetyDSCR safetyDefense Logistics Agency Installation Management Richmond's Fire and Emergency ServicesFire Safety Aviation
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 67 (Wednesday, April 8, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 18840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07951]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0888; FRL-9924-75]

Notice of Receipt of Requests for Amendments To Terminate Uses in 
Certain Pesticide Registrations; Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register of February 25, 
2015, concerning Amendments to Terminate Uses in Certain Pesticide 
Registrations. This document corrects the uses being terminated for 
registration number 39967-118.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Green, Information 
Technology and Resources Management Division (7502P), Office of 
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania 
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (703) 347-0367; 
email address: green.christopher@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    The Agency included in the February 25, 2015 notice, a list of 
those who may be potentially affected by this action.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    The docket for this action, identified by docket identification 
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0888, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory 
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency 
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public 
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public 
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP 
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and 
additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. What does this correction do?

    FR Doc. 2015-03926, published in the Federal Register of February 
25, 2015, (80 FR 10091) (FRL-9921-65) is corrected as follows:

On page 10091, fourth column, under the heading, Use to be terminated, 
paragraph 1, line 4, correct Arts, Crafts Latex, Finger Paints, Paints, 
Coating, Inks & Dyes to read Arts/Crafts Latex/Finger Paints.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: March 19, 2015.
Mark A. Hartman,
Director, Information Technology and Resources Management Division, 
Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015-07951 Filed 4-7-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Benin [electronic resource].**
 
2002
Mar
Sep
2003
Mar
Oct
2004
Mar
Sep
2005
Jun
 
2007
May
Nov
2008
May
Nov
2009
May
Dec
 
 
SuDoc Number:ID 1.29:B 43/
Item Number:0900-I-20 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000632004
 
October 10, 2019
Exhibit 32.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), the undersigned officer of Immunomedics. Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 26, 2008                                                             
|                                                                                   
|/s/ GERARD G. GORMAN                                                               
|Gerard G. Gorman                                                                   
|Senior Vice President, Finance and Business Development and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Comdisco, Inc. and Subsidiaries                                     Exhibit 3.02



                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                                               

          Comdisco,  Inc., a  corporation  organized  and existing  under and by
virtue of the  General  Corporation  Law of the State of  Delaware,  DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY:
          FIRST: That the Board of Directors of said  corporation,  at a meeting
duly  held,  adopted a  resolution  setting  forth a proposed  amendment  to the
Restated  Certificate  of  Incorporation  of said  corporation,  declaring  said
amendment  to be  advisable  and calling a meeting of the  stockholders  of said
corporation for consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed
amendment is as follows:
          RESOLVED,  that the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Comdisco,
          Inc. be amended by changing  the Fourth  Article  thereof so that,  as
          amended, said Article shall be and read as follows:

          The aggregate  number of shares which Comdisco shall have authority to
          issue is 850,000,000 of which  750,000,000  shares shall be designated
          as "Common Stock" of the par value of $0.10 per share and  100,000,000
          shares shall be designated  as  "Preferred  Stock" of the par value of
          $0.10 per share.

          SECOND:  That  thereafter,  pursuant  to  resolution  of its  Board of
Directors,  a special meeting of the  stockholders of said  corporation was duly
called and held,  upon written  waiver of notice signed by all  stockholders  at
which meeting the  necessary  number of shares as required by statute were voted
in favor of the amendment.
          THIRD:  That said  amendment was duly adopted in  accordance  with the
provisions  of  Section  242 of the  General  Corporation  Law of the  State  of
Delaware. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Comdisco, Inc. has caused this certificate to
be signed by Philip A. Hewes,  its Senior Vice  President  and  Secretary,  this
Third day of February, 1998.
                                    Comdisco, Inc.



                                    By /s/ Philip A. Hewes
                                    Senior Vice President and Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          42,982
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  453,552
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,558
<INVENTORY>                                    659,484
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,175,806
<PP&E>                                         119,243
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,491
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,286,575
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          949,404
<BONDS>                                            628
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,376
<OTHER-SE>                                     329,965
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,286,575
<SALES>                                      7,621,352
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,623,054
<CGS>                                        7,429,693
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,583,356
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,376
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,465
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,698
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,694
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,139
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,139
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .84
        


</TABLE>
Steam Electric Tribal Consultation National Call

March 28, 2012

EPA Participants: Tribal Participants:

Rob Wood Patrick Antonio, Navajo Nation

Jan Matuszko Ronnie Bent, Navajo Nation

James Covington

Ronald Jordan

Jezebele Alicea

Felicia Wright

Navajo EPA concerns relate to an older ash facility. There are old ash ponds from 

the late 1960s on which the newer impoundments were built. The tribal 

representatives expressed concern for potential leaching of ash contaminants into 

the groundwater, and surface seeps at the base of the ponds to the nearby 

intermittent wash. The tribe monitors the wash, but is not sure whether the cooling 

pond or ash ponds are sources of contaminants.

Facilities of concern:

• CCR Landfill is located off site and down the road from the power plant; 

Morgan Lake, which is the cooling intake water source; and old ash ponds.

Environmental concerns:

• There are nearby grazing/ranching operations of cattle, sheep and horses. 

• Contaminants from facility (e.g., through leachate, seeps, fugitive dust 

emissions) may be getting into livestock drinking waters, which is an 

unregulated drinking water source. 

• Concern for safety to consume livestock and edible and medicinal plants 

growing in the area; these make up the local food supply. 

• Tribe would like to see requirements for more monitoring and to go public 

with the proposed rule information. 

• Tribe is concerned on cumulative effects of releases from facility 

wastes/effluent over time, and making its way downstream to impact 

agriculture, livestock and livelihoods of the local people.

Four Corners facility:

• State of NM is involved in the oversight, inspects the structural integrity of 

facility components. 

• Facility is planning to shut down three out of five units in the near future. 

Tribe not considering taking over ownership.

• Employs 600-700 people, 85% of which are Navajo Nation members.

• NPDES permit is over 10 years old.
EPA: There is one other EPA action that may more directly address these concerns: 

the Coal Combustion Rule (OSWER). EPA will share the Navajo contacts and this 

meeting summary with our sister office, which has not conducted tribal consultation 

on the proposed rule.
#### Clemintina CHACON and Raul Chacon, her husband, Appellants, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 76-1069.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 11, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 16, 1977.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Stanley M. Rosenblatt, Miami, for appellants.

*66Helliwell, Melrose & De Wolf and William E. Sadowski, Blackwell, Walker, Gray, Powers, Flick & Hoehl, Miami, for appel-lees.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal questions the correctness of a summary final judgment rendered in favor of appellees in an action arising from injuries sustained by appellants when Mrs. Cha-con slipped and fell while she was attempting to ascend to the second floor of appel-lee’s store on its escalator.

We have carefully examined the record on appeal, considered the briefs and argument of counsel and have concluded therefrom that reversible error has not been demonstrated.

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1175

SHAHED FARASAT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEBBIE PAULIKAS; MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED; CTF HOTEL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, a body corporate, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-1488-H) Submitted: November 30, 1998 Decided: December 21, 1998 Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Shahed Farasat, Appellant Pro Se. Todd James Horn, VENABLE, BAETJER & HOWARD, Baltimore, Maryland; Nancy Carolyn Lee, MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Shahed Farasat appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss and for summary judgment in his action alleging employment discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (1994) and state law. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Farasat v. Paulikas , No. CA-97-1488-H (D. Md. June 11, 1997; Jan. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<LEGEND>          This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted   from   the    December    31,   1996   audited   financial
statements    and    is     qualified     in     its    entirety    by
reference to such financial statements.


<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996

<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996

<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS

<CASH>                                      55,568

<SECURITIES>                                58,650

<RECEIVABLES>                               38,219

<ALLOWANCES>                                 5,112

<INVENTORY>                                      0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           168,605

<PP&E>                                      24,316

<DEPRECIATION>                              22,875

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             184,522

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       67,765

<BONDS>                                          0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0

<PREFERRED>                                      0

<COMMON>                                       176

<OTHER-SE>                                 116,070

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               116,246

<SALES>                                    562,765

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           569,293

<CGS>                                      503,006

<TOTAL-COSTS>                              555,038

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0

<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              97

<INCOME-PRETAX>                             16,158

<INCOME-TAX>                                (3,267)

<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         19,425

<DISCONTINUED>                                   0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0

<CHANGES>                                        0

<NET-INCOME>                                19,425

<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 1.05

<EPS-DILUTED>                                 1.05



</TABLE>
J

- S05031

- 22 2022 PA Super 138

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

JERALD LATEITH BROWN

Appellant : : : : : : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 897 MDA 2021 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered October 19, 2017 In the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County Criminal Division at

No(s): CP

- 22

- CR

- 0003336

- 2015

BEFORE: PANELLA, P.J., STABILE, J., and DUBOW, J. CONCURRING OPINION BY DUBOW, J.: FILED: AUGUST 10, 2022 In this case, Appellant appealed the Judgment of Sentence and this Court remanded the case for the production of documents, a new suppression hearing and , depending on the decision of the suppression court, a new trial. After remand, the Commonwealth fail ed to take any action to prosecute this case within 365 days. Appellant filed a Rule 600 Motion, which the trial court denied. The Majority Opinion affirms the decision of the trial based upon its reading of Rule 600 (A) (2)(e). Rule 600 (A) (2)(e) provides t hat “when an appellate court has remanded a case to the trial court, the new trial shall commence within 365 days from the date of the written notice from the appellate court to the parties that the record was remanded.” Pa.R.Crim.P. 600(A)(2)(e) (emphasis added). The Majority concludes that since Rule 600 (A) (2)(e) only refers to “the new trial,” the time limitations set forth inJ

- S05031

- 22

- 2

-

Rule 600 do not apply to the Commonwealth in this case because the Superior Court did not remand for a new trial, but rather a ne w suppression hearing. Maj. Op

. at 10 . I am constrained to agree with this statutory construction of Rule 600 (A)( 2)(e) and join the Majority Opinion. I, however, write separately to express my dismay that the Commonwealth, following our remand, took no act ion for more than a year to prosecute this case. Our Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the Commonwealth has an obligation to proceed with due diligence at all times during the pendency of a case. See generally Commonwealth v. Harth , 252 A.3d 600, 618 (Pa. 2021) (discussing Rule 600 and the Commonwealth’s due diligence requirement throughout a case)

. I urge the Pennsylvania Criminal Procedural Rules Committee to evaluate whether it is appropriate for the Commonwealth to have no time requireme nt to prosecute a case when this Court remands a case for a proceeding other than a trial. I suggest that the Committee consider imposing the one

- year time limitation on not only trials, but also any proceeding for which Superior Court remands a case.