alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BOWIE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. Dewey RODRIGUE.

No. 11563.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

May 17, 1977.

Charles Hanemann, Houma, for appellant.

Keith N. Whipple, Houma, for appellee.

Before ELLIS, CHIASSON and PONDER, JJ.

ELLIS, Judge:

In this suit, plaintiff’s main demand is for $650.00 and defendant’s reconventional demand is for $100.00. Judgment was rendered and signed on March 8, 1977, granting judgment to plaintiff for $650.00 plus interest.

C.C.P. Article 4833(B), amended by Act 84 of 1976, provides:

> “The appeal from a city court when the amount in contest is one thousand dollars or less exclusive of interest, shall be returnable to the district court of the district in which the city is located.

> “The appeal from a city court when the amount in contest exceeds one thousand dollars, exclusive of interest, shall be returnable to the court of appeal of the circuit in which the city is located.”

This appeal should have been taken to the 32nd Judicial District Court, and this Court is therefore without jurisdiction.

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 2162 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and R.S. 13:4441, this appeal is hereby transferred to the 32nd Judicial District Court in and for the Parish of Terrebonne for further proceedings, according to law.

APPEAL TRANSFERRED.
Order entered November 15, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00534-CV

KELLY D. HOLLINGSWORTH AND K. HOLLINGSWORTH & ASSOC., P.C.,

Appellants

V.

WALAAL CORPORATION D/B/A AMBASSADOR CAB, FARHAN RIYALE, BASHIR 

SALAH, E.P.D.A., INC. D/B/A ALAMO CAB, TESFAI H. SBAHTU, D.E.C.D.A., INC. 

D/B/A STARCAB, GIRMA WOLDE-RUFAEL, BEKELE KIDANE, Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-03638

ORDER

On the Court’s own motion, we REMOVE this appeal from submission on December 

12, 2018. The appeal will be resubmitted in the first quarter of 2019.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
[GRAPHIC OMITTED]
DEAN HELLER
SECRETARY OF STATE                                    Entity#
204 NORTH CARSON STREET, SUITE 1                      C28839-2004
CARSON CITY, NEVADA 89701-4299                        Document Number
(775) 684 5708                                        20050119417-60
WEBSITE: SECRETARYOFSTATE.BIZ                         Date Filed:
                                                      4/12/2005 3:20:34 PM
                                                      IN THE OFFICE OF
----------------------------------------
  AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION                  /s/Dean Heller
  BEFORE ISSUANCE OF CLASS OR SERIES                  DEAN HELLER
     (PURSUANT TO NRS 78.1955)                        SECRETARY OF STATE
----------------------------------------

Important: Read attached instructions
     before completing form.                  ABOVE SPACE IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY


             CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION
             ------------------------------------------------------
                         FOR NEVADA PROFIT CORPORATIONS
                         ------------------------------
          (PURSUANT TO NRS 78.1955 - BEFORE ISSUANCE OF CLASS OR SERIES)

1. Name  of  corporation:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORP.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. The original class or series of stock set forth:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Series B Preferred Stock, 1,000,000 shares.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. By resolution of the board of directors the original class or series is
   amended as follows:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Series B Preferred Stock is to consist Of 5,000,000 shares.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. As of the date of this certificate no shares of the class or series of stock
   have been issued.

                                       -----------------------------------------
5. Effective date of filing (optional):
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                         (must not be later that 90 days
                                          after the certificate is filed)

6. Officer Signature (Required):  /s/ illegible
                                 -----------------------------------------------


  IMPORTANT:  Failure  to include any of the above information and submit the
  proper  fees  may  cause  this  filing  to  be  rejected.

  Filling Fee: $175.00

  SUBMIT IN DUPLICATE

This form must be accompanied by appropriate fees see attached fee schedule.

                          Nevada Secretary of State AM 78.1955 Before Issue 2003
                                                             Revised on 11/03/00


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, 
FILED ON MARCH 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
            

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         12604
<SECURITIES>                                       0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                    568
<ALLOWANCES>                                      38
<INVENTORY>                                     1333
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               14680
<PP&E>                                          9316
<DEPRECIATION>                                  6684
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 17361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2984
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                    10458
<COMMON>                                        1332
<OTHER-SE>                                      2587
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   17361
<SALES>                                         1720
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                5718
<CGS>                                           2271
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               12979
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 130
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1514
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9848)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9848)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9848)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.09)
        


</TABLE>
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: 

lfyoumake chan~es 10 the wtlues iu the wb/e be/oll', you must ensure the wtals update uccordiiiR~v. if 

they do not. click for Tab) into am/ !hen out t!ltlte clwnged cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, e ngine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@S85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Inspect Aircraft 

Hydraulic Power 0.7 2,875 Pack- Single 

Engine Aircraft I 

Inspect Aircraft 

Hydraulic Power 1.0 ' '-' ' 86 - Pack- Multi 

Engine Aircraf 

ocil I ' •il 

' ,. 1•. . .. .. ,, ' .,,,\: . ' 

I II• ' " . • •.H ,,,., 1 ' 111 

,, ' Ill• 11 :n 

II • i 1• 

'l 

,, 

" J I • 1. 1 

" ' . 'I 

'·' ,,, . H 

II I (li ,, . 

It, 'II q ,.~. 

•I (Ill ' (" 

II I• 'II ... ' 

li ,I ,II. I il 

(I ,j ,,,,,, ' I I 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $178,373 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) s 

On-Condition Costs: ~ 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

testing, and close- replacement) up) 
Install Terminal 

Lug Protective Cap 1.0 ' $29 for Hydraulic 

Power Pack 

• I IJII ill 

~ . 'I '· I •li't 

rl <, II I 1ol 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field con also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?~ 

YES* D N0[8] 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? G 

YES* D N0[8] 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. G 

YES D N0[8J 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific reguirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? • 

YES* D N0[8] 

*Explanation:
No. 00-6807.

#### Pace *v.*Hicks, Warden.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries III, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: January 30, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky IndustriesI III, Inc.
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


In
      connection with the Annual Report of Oak Hill Financial, Inc. (the "Registrant")
      on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dale B. Shafer,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Registrant.




*/s/
      Dale B. Shafer*




Dale
      B.
      Shafer


Interim
      Chief Financial Officer




August
      7,
      2007






8
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________ NO . 09
- 1 5
- 00 179
- C R



### ____________________ IN RE BRYAN CHANCE MCBEE

_________________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding

_________________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Bryan Chance McBee petitioned for a writ of mandamus compel ling the judge of the 221st District Court of Montgomery County to require the court coordinator to set for hearing McBee’s motion for a loan of the duplicate record that was prepared for an appeal. See generally Tex. R . App. P. 34.5(g), 34.6(h).
Mc Bee does not contend that the trial court retains plenary power over the criminal

case. 1 There is no active habeas proceeding; accordingly, this Court has mandamus jurisdiction. See Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist. , 392 S.W.3d 115,

1 We issued a mandate of affirmance in July 2014. See generally McBee v. State , No. 09

- 13

- 00232

- CR, 2014 WL 1400656 , at * 5 (Tex. App.

— Beaumont Apr. 9, 2014, pet. ref’d) (mem. op.) (affirming judgment as modified)

.2 117

- 18 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). However, t he mandamus petition lacks certified or sworn copies of “every document that is material to the relator’ s claim for relief [

. ] ”
See Tex. R. App. P. 5 2.7(a)(1)

. McBee suggests he cannot provide copies of documents because he is a prisoner. McBee also failed to provide proof of service on the respondent and the prosecuti ng attorney

. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5

. T he petition nevertheless demonstrates that McBee is not entitled to mandamus relief because he has not shown that he ha s a clear and indisputable right to the requested relief. See In re Williams , No. 09

- 09

- 00584

- CV, 2010 WL 183861, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Beaumont Jan. 21, 2010, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); see also In re Cash , No. 06

- 04

- 00045

- CV, 2004 WL 769 473, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Texarkana Apr.13, 2004, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) ( A trial court has no duty to rule on “free

- floating motions unrelated to currently pending actions

. ”). The relator has not shown that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the pe tition for writ of mandamus.
PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM Submitted on May 26, 2015 Opinion Delivered May 27, 2015 Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson , JJ.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      of Officers Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K
      of
      Greater Community Bancorp (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2006,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), each of the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the
      signatory, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable; and that the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
      document.








Date:
      March 15, 2007








*/s/
      Anthony M. Bruno, Jr.*


Anthony
      M. Bruno, Jr.


Chief
      Executive Officer








*/s/
      Stephen J. Mauger*


Stephen
      J. Mauger


Chief
      Financial Officer










A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.






E-12
!(

!(

!(

!( !( !(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!( !( !(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

Murphy, North Carolina

Hiwassee River

Valley River

U.S.

Forest

Service

£¤19

£¤64

UV1325

24

64

51

49

37 38

46

66

49

46

61

60

59

57

57

53

51

45

50

43

41

30

28

48

47

65

63 62 61

58

56

55

54

52

24

44

40

42

29

26

27

25

41

23

22

21

!(20

!(

!(

!( !( !(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!( !( !(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

Murphy, North Carolina

Hiwassee River

Valley River

U.S.

Forest

Service

£¤19

£¤64

UV1325

24

64

51

49

37 38

46

66

49

46

61

60

59

57

57

53

51

45

50

43

41

30

28

48

47

65

63 62 61

58

56

55

54

52

24

44

40

42

29

26

27

25

41

23

22

21

20

\\alismurphy\home\mprlm\projects\landplan\maps\Hiwassee_land_plan\Hiwassee_land_plan_for_Web.mxd

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000

Feet /

Hiwassee Reservoir

Land Management Plan Jul 24, 2008

Tile: B4
# C_2014261EN.01001804.xml

| 11.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/18

---

Order of the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 21 May 2014 — Fabryka Łożysk Tocznych-Kraśnik S.A. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Impexmetal S.A.

(Case C-292/13 P) (1)

1

2014/C 261/31

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 215, 27.7.2013.

1

---
Opinion filed September 27, 2018

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-18-00223-CR

___________

BRIAN HARRISON SIMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 35th District Court

Brown County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR25839

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Brian Harrison Sims, Appellant, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. In 

the motion, Appellant indicates that he no longer wishes to prosecute an appeal in 

this cause. Attached to the motion is a document in which Appellant explains why 

he no longer wishes to pursue this appeal. The motion is signed by Appellant’s 

counsel, and the document attached to the motion is signed by Appellant and his 

counsel. Consequently, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2.
2

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. 

PER CURIAM

September 27, 2018

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1

Willson, J., not participating.

 1

Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, 

sitting by assignment.
No. 6144.

#### MRS. FANNIE L. R. FISHER vs. FRANK ROUSEO.

Opinion and decree, June 26th, 1914.

Rehearing refused, July 17th, 1914.

Syllabus.

Involves only issues of fact.

Appeal from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Division “B,” No. 104,343. Hon. F. D. King, Judge.

W. V. Seeber, for plaintiff and appellant.

John L. Pelin, for defendant and appellee.

His Honor, JOHN ST. PAUL,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

Plaintiff, as universal legatee of her deceased husband, brings this suit upon an open' account alleged to be due the deceased.

Defendant denies the account, or that he owed the deceased anything whatever, declaring that he settled with the latter sometime before his death for whatever, he then owed-him.

The account sued on was not proved, nor was any attempt made to prove it. On the other hand there is proof that defendant paid the deceased money not credited on the account, and defendant swears that the account sued on is not correct and that the payment made to the deceased was in full for everything he then owed him.

Under the circumstances the judgment herein, rejecting the plaintiff’s demand is correct.

Judgment affirmed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# New training chief takes over in Richmond

By Leon Moore, Public Affairs SpecialistDLA Aviation Public Affairs Office

                RICHMOND, Va.  –              
Jeremy Lorton, a firefighter within Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Richmond Virginia’s Fire and Emergency Branch’s Security and Emergency Services Division was recently promoted to training chief during a ceremony in the apparatus bay of the fire station on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia Dec. 5.  

Lorton has been with the department one year.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA Installation Management Richmond VirginiaPeople and Culture
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Robert O’BRIEN, John O’Neill, John Herman, David Grussfeld, Steve Martin, Greg Orr, Michael Tidmarsh and Richard Badalaro.

No. 60352.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 26, 1977.

In Re: Robert O’Brien, et al. applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ refused. Insufficient showing at this time to warrant the quashing of the subpoenas.

CALOGERO, J.,

concurs. Absent a showing that applicants are to be questioned concerning the transaction out of which they have been charged by bill of information, and until attempt is made to require applicants to appear before the grand jury without counsel, I am unprepared to find erroneous the trial court’s determination refusing to quash the subpoenas.

MARCUS, J., concurs for reasons assigned by Justice CALOGERO.

DENNIS, J., concurs for the reasons stated by CALOGERO, J. and because we cannot assume that applicants will be denied their rights to remain silent and to assistance of counsel at each stage of the proceedings.