alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00236-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF Charles Inness THRASH, 

an Incapacitated Adult

From the Probate Court No. 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-PC-2912-A

Honorable Oscar J. Kazen, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, Brittany Martinez’s appeal is 

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. Laura Martinez’s motion to stay the underlying 

proceedings is DENIED AS MOOT, and we AFFIRM the probate court’s order.

We order that Appellees Mary C. Werner and Tonya M. Barina recover their costs of court 

for this appeal from Appellants Laura Martinez and Brittany Martinez.

SIGNED April 29, 2020.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
     I, George Hill Comeau, Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of theBank; Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Bancorp,Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
           (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
           (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisannual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
           (c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluationas of the Evaluation Date;
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions);
           (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for theregistrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal control; and
           (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls;and
     6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in thisannual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
/s/ George Hill ComeauGeorge Hill Comeau
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 12

- 00563

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF A.R. , H.R., and D.R., Children From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010

- PA

- 02447 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Delivered and Filed: February 20, 2013 AFFIRMED This is an appeal from the trial court’s order terminating A ppellants’ parental rights to their three children. The court

- appointed appellate attorney for each appellant fil ed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Each attorney concludes that the appeal for his respective client is frivolous and without merit. The briefs meet the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R ., No. 04

- 03

- 00096

- CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at * 4 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders p rocedure in an appeal from a termination of parental rights) (mem. op.); see also In re K.M. , 98 S.W.3d 774, 775 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 2003, order) (same).04

- 12

- 00563

- CV

- 2

- The attorney for each appellant certified that a copy of his brief was delivered to his respective c lient who was advised of his or her right to examine the record and to file a pro se brief. Neither parent filed a pro se brief. After reviewing the record, we agree that each A ppellant’s appeal is frivolous and without merit. We affirm t he trial court ’ s order and grant each Appellant’s attorney’s motion to withdraw.

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43141-43142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21238]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Notice of Proposed Change to Section 4 of the Maryland State 
Technical Guide

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department 
of Agriculture.

ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes in the Maryland 
State Technical Guide for review and comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: It has been determined by the NRCS State Conservationist for 
Maryland that changes must be made in the NRCS State Technical Guide 
specifically in practice standards 329A Residue Management; No-Till and 
Strip Till, 329B Residue Management; Mulch Till, 329C Residue 
Management; Ridge Till, and 344 Residue Management; Seasonal, to 
account for improved technology. These practices can be used in 
conservation systems that treat highly erodible land.

DATES: Comments will be received on or before September 11, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR A COPY OF THE STANDARD(S) CONTACT:
David P. Doss, State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation 
Service, 339 Busch's Frontage Road, Suite 301, Annapolis, MD 21401; 
410-757-0861; FAX 410-757-0687.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture 
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after 
enactment of the law to NRCS State technical guides used to carry out 
highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law shall be made 
available for public review and

[[Page 43142]]

comment. For the next 30 days the NRCS will receive comments relative 
to the proposed changes. Following that period a determination will be 
made by the NRCS regarding disposition of those comments and a final 
determination of change will be made.

    Dated: July 11, 1997.
David P. Doss,
State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. 97-21238 Filed 8-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 77559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31846]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

THE NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Meeting of Humanities Panel

AGENCY: The National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Humanities Panel will be held at the Old Post Office, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisette Voyatzis, Advisory Committee 
Management Officer, National Endowment for the Humanities, Washington, 
DC 20506; telephone (202) 606-8322. Hearing-impaired individuals are 
advised that information on this matter may be obtained by contacting 
the Endowment's TDD terminal on (202) 606-8282.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this Humanities Panel meeting 
is to advise the Endowment on its EDISTEment program, specifically the 
creation of content on the topic of world history for the EDSITEment 
Web site. EDSITEment is an on-line educational partnership between the 
Endowment and the Verizon Foundation, Thinkfinity.org, and can be 
accessed at http://edsitement.neh.gov/. The morning session of the 
meeting will be open to the public. A ten-minute time slot at the end 
of the public session of the meeting is reserved for public comments. 
The afternoon session of the meeting will be closed to the public 
pursuant to subsection (c)(9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, United 
States Code because that portion of the proposed meeting will consider 
information that is likely to disclose information the premature 
disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate 
implementation of a proposed agency action. I have made this 
determination under the authority granted me by the Chairman's 
Delegation of Authority to Close Advisory Committee meetings, dated 
July 19, 1993.
    Date: January 10, 2012.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Room: 421.
    Program: This meeting will provide advice about the creation of 
content for world history on the Endowment's EDSITEment Web site.
    Agenda: 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.--Open session.
    12:30 p.m. to 2 p.m.--Closed session.

Lisette Voyatzis,
Advisory Committee, Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-31846 Filed 12-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
```
# C_2013171EN.01001302.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/13

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria (Hungary) lodged on 18 March 2013 — Szatmári Malom Kft. v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal Központi Szerve

(Case C-135/13)

2013/C 171/26

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Kúria

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Szatmári Malom Kft.

Applicant:

Defendant: Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal Központi Szerve

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | May a situation where a business operator, having closed down previous holdings, wishes to establish a new holding without increasing existing capacity be deemed to fall within the concept of improving overall performance of the agricultural holding under Article 26(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development? |
| --- | --- |

1.

May a situation where a business operator, having closed down previous holdings, wishes to establish a new holding without increasing existing capacity be deemed to fall within the concept of improving overall performance of the agricultural holding under Article 26(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development?

| 2. | May the investment to be made by the applicant be interpreted as investment for the purpose of improving overall performance of the enterprise within the meaning of Articles 20(b)(iii) and 28(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005? (1) |
| --- | --- |

2.

May the investment to be made by the applicant be interpreted as investment for the purpose of improving overall performance of the enterprise within the meaning of Articles 20(b)(iii) and 28(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005? (1)

1

| 3. | Is Paragraph 6(3) of the Decree of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (FVM) No 47/2008 of 17 April 2008 compatible with Article 28(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 in that, as regards mills, only support for operations for the purpose of modernising existing capacity is granted? Does the Regulation empower the national legislature to exclude certain types of development from support for economic reasons? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Is Paragraph 6(3) of the Decree of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (FVM) No 47/2008 of 17 April 2008 compatible with Article 28(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 in that, as regards mills, only support for operations for the purpose of modernising existing capacity is granted? Does the Regulation empower the national legislature to exclude certain types of development from support for economic reasons?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2005 L 277, p. 1).

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# New contingency contracting officers readying for possible deployment 

By Beth ReeceDLA Public Affairs

                Fort Belvoir, Virginia  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

contingency contractingexpeditionarydisasterhumanitarianJCASO
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Floyd W. Pickrell, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Bernard J. Pitz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Floyd W. Pickrell, Jr.
|Floyd W. Pickrell, Jr.,   
|Chief Executive Officer   
|                          
|August 9, 2005            
|                          
|/s/ Bernard J. Pitz       
|Bernard J. Pitz,          
|Chief Financial Officer   



August 9, 2005



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Page 4 of 4




                           RONSON CORPORATION DECLARES
                        5% STOCK DIVIDEND ON COMMON STOCK


Somerset, N.J., February 1, 2007 - Ronson Corporation (NASDAQ Capital Market
RONC). Ronson Corporation (the "Company") today reported:

DECLARATION OF 5% COMMON STOCK DIVIDEND - The Company's Board of Directors on
February 1, 2007 declared a 5% stock dividend on the Company's outstanding
Common Stock. The 5% stock dividend is payable on April 16, 2007 to stockholders
of record March 30, 2007. The 5% stock dividend will increase the outstanding
common shares of the Company by about 228,000 to about 4,815,000 shares.

Ronson Corporation's operations include its wholly-owned subsidiaries:
1) Ronson Consumer Products Corporation in Woodbridge, NJ, and Ronson
Corporation of Canada Ltd, manufacturers and marketers of Ronson consumer
products; and 2) Ronson Aviation, Inc., a fixed base operator at Trenton-Mercer
airport, Trenton, NJ, providing fueling, sales/services of aircraft, avionics
and hangar/office leasing.
No. 47132.

#### Protests 27321-K, etc., of H. P. Lambert Co., Inc., et al. (Boston).

*507Opinion by

Keefe, J.

The testimony showed that the drums in question were very fragile in construction; that they had been used several times prior to their use as containers of the cod-liver oil; and that .they were one-time shippers and generally unsatisfactory as containers of cod-liver oil. The record showed that the drums could not be further used as containers and were discarded as junk. Therefore they were not capable of entering commerce in competition with other drums as containers. On the record presented the drums in question were held entitled to free entry as claimed.
# C_2016068EN.01000301.xml

| 22.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 December 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Namur — Belgium) — Proximus SA, formerly Belgacom SA, continuing the proceedings brought by Belgacom Mobile SA v Province of Namur

(Case C-517/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Electronic communications networks and services - Directive 97/13/EC - Articles 4 and 11 - Directive 2002/20/EC - Article 6 - Conditions which may be attached to the general authorisation and to the rights of use for radio frequencies and numbers, and specific obligations - Article 13 - Fee for the rights to install facilities - Scope - Provincial legislation - Charge on mobile telephony network transmission and reception pylons and/or units))

(2016/C 068/03)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal de première instance de Namur

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Proximus SA, formerly Belgacom SA, continuing the proceedings brought by Belgacom Mobile SA

Applicant:

Defendant: Province of Namur

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 6 and 13 of Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive) must be interpreted as not precluding a charge, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, being imposed on any natural or legal persons operating mobile telephony network transmission and reception pylons and/or units.

---

(1)  OJ C 352, 30.11.2013.

1

---
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Huifeng Bio-Pharmaceutical Technology,
      Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Sanding Tao, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




1.
      The
      Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      August 18, 2006









/s/
      Sanding Tao


Sanding
      Tao


Chief
      Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 23, 2010 

p0616 

Order 

 

June 23, 2010 

140493 

SCOTT KROEGER and CANDY KROEGER, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 140493 

 COA: 286333 

Monroe CC: 06-022559-CK 

AEC ENTERPRISES CONSTRUCTION, 

INC., AUBREY E. CROSBY, and 

LANDAMERICA TITLE CO., 

Defendants, 

and 

REPUBLIC BANK, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 22, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.