alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Spectrum Realty, Inc.(the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William
J. Carden, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated
      and results of operations of the Company for the period
      indicated.





Dated:   August
13, 2010





/s/
      William J. CardenWilliam
      J. CardenPresident
      and Chief Executive
Officer
No. 46558.

#### Protest 8259-K of Swift & Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

There was a question as to whether the letter “D” was embossed on these particular drums in question to signify that they were drawback drums, in compliance with various regulations of the Treasury Department. Several witnesses were called. The Government admitted the evidence established that the 10 drums in question were not embossed with the letter “D” but contended that there is no proof that the manufacturers complied with the requirements of the Treasury Department. From the evidence it was held that these drums are clearly not included in the requirement as having been made from foreign materials and being marked to indicate the payment of drawback, and that since they were not so marked no drawback was claimed thereon. The drums were exported as containers of lubricating- oil and it was held that such oil has been consistently held to come within the meaning of “acids or other chemicals.” From a consideration of the entire record the court was of the opinion that the drums are entitled to free entry as American goods returned and that no drawback has been paid. The protest was therefore sustained as to the 10 drums in question.
Exhibit 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

      We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in Registration  Statements
(Nos. 333-118292,  333-118291,  333-78355,  333-44489, 333-5912 and 333-5910) on
Form S-8 of Balchem  Corporation and  subsidiaries of our report dated March 15,
2007 relating to our audit of the consolidated  financial statements,  financial
schedules and internal  control over financial  reporting,  which appear in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Balchem  Corporation  for the year ended  December
31, 2006.

/s/McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
New York, New York
March 15, 2007


                                       63
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT R UB EN GAR C IA HER

NANDEZ, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 12-70737 Age n c y No. A088-825-515 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 21, 2014 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, SILVER M AN, a nd PAEZ, C irc uit Judge s. R ube n Ga rc ia He rnande z , a

native and c itiz e n of M e x ic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from an im m igration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) de c ision de ny ing his a pplic at ion for re l ie f unde r the C onve n tion Aga inst Torture(“ C AT” ). Our jurisdic tion is governe d by 8 

# FIL ED JAN 24 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).U.S.C . § 1252. W e dism iss thepe tition for re vie w.

Garc ia He rnande z ’ s only

c onte ntion is tha

t the IJ’ s C AT a

na ly sis wa s e rrone ous be c a

use the IJ de nie d his C AT c la im without a ddre ssing gove rnm e nt a c quie sc e nc e . W e la c k jurisdic tion to c onside r this a rgum e n t be c a

use Garc ia He rnande z did not ra ise it to theB IA. Se e B arron v . Ashc roft , 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th C ir. 2004) (c ourt la c ks jurisdic tion to c onside r issue s tha t ha v e not be e n a dm inistra

tive ly e xha uste d ). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDISM ISSE D.

1 2 - 7 0 7 3 7 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 39089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-16521]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7006]

U.S. National Commission for UNESCO; Notice of Closed Meeting

    The U.S. National Commission for UNESCO will hold a conference call 
on Thursday, August 19, 2010, beginning at 3 p.m. Eastern Time. The 
teleconference meeting will be closed to the public to allow the 
Commission to discuss applications for the U.S. National Commission for 
UNESCO Laura W. Bush Traveling Fellowship, a fellowship funded through 
privately donated funds. This call will be closed pursuant to Section 
10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) 
because it is likely to involve discussion of information of a personal 
nature regarding the relative merits of individual applicants where 
disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal 
privacy.
    For more information contact Elizabeth Kanick, Executive Director 
of the U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, Washington, DC 20037. 
Telephone: (202) 663-0026; Fax: (202) 663-0035; E-mail: 
DCUNESCO@state.gov.

    Dated: June 25, 2010.
Elizabeth Kanick,
Executive Director, U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2010-16521 Filed 7-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-19-P
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Six-month rotation, DLA Energy’s pipeline to success

By Elizabeth StoeckmannDLA Energy Public Affairs

                FORT BELVOIR, Virginia  –              *This is the first article in a series of DLA Energy workforce development opportunities.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

rotationSRMSustainment Restoration and ModernizationDLA Energy
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GUEST
SUPPLY'S 1995 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,591,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               28,982,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   898,000
<INVENTORY>                                 33,362,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            67,416,000
<PP&E>                                      29,810,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             102,888,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       32,193,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       543,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  41,860,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               102,888,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           179,042,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              141,044,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            30,919,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,711,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,368,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,217,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,151,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .45
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2 - SECTION 906 CFO CERTIFICATION


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Absolute Glass Protection, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").
I, Michael I. Kling, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael I. Kling
----------------------------
    Michael I. Kling
    Chief Financial Officer


Date  August 18, 2003
      ---------------
**Exhibit23.1**

 

Independent Auditors’ Consent

 

The Board of DirectorsSavient Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the registration statement Nos. 33-51202, 33-83904, 33-69870, 33-41591,33-41593, 333-36121, 333-33073, 333-33075, 333-64541, and 333-87344 on Form S-8of Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (formerly known as Bio-Technology GeneralCorp.) (the Company) of our report dated September 20, 2002, with respect tothe consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, andcash flows of Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year endedDecember 31, 2001, which report appears in the December 31, 2003, annual reporton Form 10-K of Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

 
|                  | /s/ KPMG LLP |   |
|-----------------------|--------------|--------|
|                  |
| Princeton, New Jersey |
| March 12, 2004        |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21419]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Special Emphasis 
Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Coordinating Center for the African-American 
Hereditary Prostate Cancer Study Network (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Date: August 28, 1997.
    Time: 10:00 a.m.
    Place: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, East 
Campus, Building 4401, Conference Room 3446, Research Triangle Park, 
NC 27709.
    Contact Person: Dr. Carol Shreffler, National Institute of 
Environmental Health Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle 
Park, NC 27709, (919) 541-1445.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. Grant 
applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
materials and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to 
this meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations 
imposed by the grant/contract review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.113, 
Biological Response to Environmental Agents; 93.114, Applied 
Toxicological Research and Testing; 93.115, Biometry and Risk 
Estimation; 93.894, Resource and Manpower Development, National 
Institutes of Health)

    Dated: August 7, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-21419 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2013156EN.01002402.xml

| 1.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil Constitutionnel (France) lodged on 4 April 2013 — Jeremy F. v Premier ministre

(Case C-168/13)

2013/C 156/38

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil Constitutionnel

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Jeremy F.

Applicant:

Defendant: Premier ministre

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Articles 27 and 28 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (1) be interpreted as precluding the Member States from providing for an appeal suspending execution of the decision of the judicial authority which rules, within a period of 30 days from receipt of the request, in order either to consent to the prosecution, sentencing or detention of a person with a view to the carrying out of a custodial sentence or detention order for an offence committed prior to his surrender pursuant to a European arrest warrant, other than that for which he was surrendered, or to consent to the surrender of a person to a Member State other than the executing Member State pursuant to a European arrest warrant issued for an offence committed prior to his surrender?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1.

1

---
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 144 (Monday, July 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19749]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-59-007]

Midwestern Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Request for Waiver

July 22, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 18, 1997, Midwestern Gas Transmission 
Company (Midwestern), pursuant to Section 4 of the Natural Gas Act, 
requested a waiver to permit implementation of Version 1.2 of the Gas 
Industry Standards Board (GISB) standard datasets as set forth in 
GISB's July 31 Implementation Guide on an accelerated basis.
    Midwestern states that Midwestern has requested a waiver to permit 
implementation of Version 1.2 of the GISB standard datasets of GISB's 
July 31 Implementation Guide on an accelerated basis so that its 
customers may use the best available GISB data elements at the earliest 
possible time. In the alternative, Midwestern proposes to implement 
Version 1.1 of the GISB standard datasets on an accelerated basis.
    Midwestern states that copies of this filing have been mailed to 
each of the parties that have intervened in the referenced proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with 18 CFR Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-19749 Filed 7-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41273

DARON FONTENOT, Movant-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:97-CV-302

- - - - - - - - - - December 11, 1998 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Daron Fontenot, Texas prisoner # 589653, seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) in order to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as barred by limitations. A COA may be issued only if the prisoner has made a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). In cases in which the underlying constitutional issues were never reached, the movant must make aNo. 97-41273 -2- credible showing of error by the district court in its dismissal.
See Murphy v. Johnson , 110 F.3d 10, 11 (5th Cir. 1997). The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”), Pub. L. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1217 (1996), created the one-year limitations period contained in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). The district court’s conclusion that Fontenot’s § 2254 petition, filed on May 5, 1997, was untimely was based on the assumptions that the one-year limitations period began to run when Fontenot’s conviction and sentence became final and that the tolling of the limitations period during the pendency of Fontenot’s state habeas corpus application was therefore inconsequential. The district court erred in dismissing the instant petition. See Fields v. Johnson , __ F.3d __ (5th Cir. Oct. 28, 1998, No. 98-10012), 1998 WL 754901 at *3 (§ 2244(d)(2) tolling provision applies to the one-year limitations period commencing on AEDPA’s effective date). We lack jurisdiction to consider the merits of the unaddressed underlying habeas corpus claims because the district court did not consider whether a COA should be granted on those issues. Whitehead v. Johnson , 157 F.3d 384, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1998). COA is GRANTED, the district court’s judgment is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings.
___________ No. 95-1973

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Jozell Thomas James, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 5, 1995 Filed: January 22, 1996

___________ Before FAGG, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Jozell Thomas James pleaded guilty to two counts of aiding and abetting the distribution of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. James and the government both objected to the drug quantity calculation proposed in James's presentence report. At sentencing, with the government's drug quantity witness in attendance, counsel advised the court that they had reached a sentencing agreement that would permit withdrawal of each party's objections. Most relevant for our purposes, that agreement provided for a recommended guidelines sentencing range of 151 to 168 months in prison. The lower figure was the bottom of the range urged by the government, while the higher figure was the top of the range recommended in the PSR. James confirmed on the record that this was his agreement with the government. The1 The HONORABLE STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
-2- district court 1 then stated that the agreement was acceptable to the court and sentenced James to 165 months in prison.

On appeal, James argues that the district court committed plain error in calculating his total offense level and his Criminal History Category. However, James may not attack on appeal a sentencing term to which he specifically agreed in the district court. See, e.g. , United States v. Nguyen , 46 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.