alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2389 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2389

 To deem the submission of certain claims to an Indian Health Service 
                     contracting officer as timely.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mr. Begich (for himself, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Tester, and Mr. Crapo) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                      Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To deem the submission of certain claims to an Indian Health Service 
                     contracting officer as timely.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TIMELY SUBMISSION OF CERTAIN CLAIMS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a claim submitted to an 
Indian Health Service contracting officer pursuant to the Indian Self-
Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.) on 
or before October 31, 2005, involving a claim that accrued after 
October 1, 1995, and on or before September 30, 1999, shall be deemed 
to be timely submitted.
                                 <all>
```
II 

Calendar No. 148 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1207 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

30777 Rancho California Road in Temecula, California, as the ‘‘Dalip 

Singh Saund Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 9, 2005 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself and Mrs. BOXER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 29, 2005 

Committee discharged and ordered to be placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 30777 Rancho California Road in Temecula, 

California, as the ‘‘Dalip Singh Saund Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DALIP SINGH SAUND POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 30777 Rancho California Road 
2 

S 1207 PCS 

1 in Temecula, California, shall be known and designated 

2 as the ‘‘Dalip Singh Saund Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the Dalip Singh Saund 

7 Post Office Building. 

Calendar No. 148 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1207 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States PostSingh Saund Post Office Building’’. Road in Temecula, California, as the ‘‘Dalip al Service located at 30777 Rancho California 

JUNE 29, 2005 

Committee discharged and ordered to be placed on the 

calendar
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS12095 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA employee receives Canadian Meritorious Service Medal

By Chris Erbe

                Washington, DC  –              **> *Col. Shearer, of the United States Army, was a true champion for Canada as Sustainment Enterprise Director and Chief of the Combined Joint Logistics Branch within Regional Command (South) Headquarters from May 2010 to June 2011.  Consistently employing our soldiers in key positions, he was crucial to the Canadian Contingent’s integration into the Headquarters and ensured Canada received essential support during a critical period of mission transition. Col. Shearer’s superb leadership was vital to operational success and helped preserve Canada’s legacy in Afghanistan.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

J3CanadaCoalitionAlliesMedalsustainmentjointAfghanistanisaf
#### Lyman WALKER, III, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent.

No. GG-66.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 18, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 12, 1977.

*127Jon D. Caminez and John D. Carlson, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Allen E. DeSerio and H. Reynolds Sampson, Tallahassee, for respondent.

SMITH, Judge.

A signowner petitions for review of a Department of Transportation order adopting the proposed order of a hearing officer and finding that petitioner’s signs adjacent to an interstate highway are in violation of Section 479.11(1) and (2), Florida Statutes (1975). The signs were ordered removed.

Petitioner contended before the hearing officer and here that his signs, which advertise the sale of pecans at a stand on a nearby intersecting highway, were excepted from the proscription of Section 479.11(1) and (2) by Section 479.16(2), which permits signs

> . constructed, erected, operated, used or maintained on any farm by the owner or lessee of such farm and relating solely to farm produce, merchandise, service or entertainment sold, produced, manufactured or furnished on such farm.

The Department urges concerning farm produce that the exception restricts permissible on-site advertising to produce of the farm. The statute is not so limited. Given an active farm, the exception permits on-site advertising by the farm owner or lessee of farm produce sold there but obtained elsewhere.

The evidence does not qualify petitioner for the farm exemption. Although the transcript contains evidence the petitioner’s signs stood near an old pecan grove of seventeen trees, there was no evidence that petitioner owned or leased the grove, or that the grove was actively farmed, or that the advertised sale of pecans took place on the farm. The burden of proving entitlement to the statutory exemption was on petitioner and he did not prove important elements of the exemption. The Department’s final order should have so stated, in response to the exception to the recommended order filed by petitioner, *Stuck-ey’s of Eastman, Georgia v. Dep’t of Transp.,*340 So.2d 119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), *128but that omission in this case did not impair the fairness of the proceedings or the correctness of the action. Section 120.68(7), Florida Statutes (Supp.1976).

No other error appears. The prayer of the petition for review is DENIED.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and MELVIN, J., concur.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries III, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: January 22, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries III, Inc.
#### John Milton OWENS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1806.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 24, 1978.

*119Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Paul Morris, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

John Owens appeals a judgment of conviction entered after a non-jury trial on the charge of carrying a concealed firearm, and an order of revocation of probation. He was sentenced to two concurrent one-year terms of imprisonment. Two issues are presented on this appeal. The first is whether a probationer has standing to challenge the admissibility of evidence obtained as the result of an allegedly unreasonable search and seizure, in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The second issue is whether there was probable cause for the search and seizure.

The record contains testimony as to the entire incident, including the officer’s probable cause and the details of the search itself. The trial judge refused to hear argument on the defendant’s motion to suppress, stating on the record that as a probationer, the defendant had no standing to challenge the allegedly unlawful search and seizure. We do not agree. A defendant does not absolutely forfeit the protection of the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures merely by assuming the status of a probationer; and while evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment may be admissible against the probationer in a revocation hearing, such evidence cannot constitutionally be admitted at a criminal trial. *Croteau*v. *State,*334 So.2d 577, 579 (Fla.1976). Therefore, the trial judge should not have refused to hear the motion to suppress at the criminal trial solely on the basis of the defendant’s status as a probationer. However, the denial óf the motion to suppress was proper on another ground.

Generally, if a trial judge’s order, judgment or decree is sustainable under any theory revealed by the record on appeal, notwithstanding that it may have been bottomed on an erroneous theory, an erroneous reason or an erroneous ground, the order, judgment or decree will be affirmed. *Savage v. State,*156 So.2d 566 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963). While the trial court should have allowed argument on the motion to suppress, it was not error to deny the motion as the search was proper under the Fourth Amendment, and was bottomed on probable cause. See *Pennsylvania v. Mimms,*- U.S. -, 98 S.Ct. 330, 54 L.Ed.2d 331, opinion filed December 5,1977.

Affirmed.
----

**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADDED BY**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**Theresa      M. Wasko**

|   | · | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and                15(d) of                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | To                my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,                in                all material respects, the Company’s financial condition and results of                operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented                in                the Report. |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Theresa M. Wasko                                                                      |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| **Theresa                M. Wasko**,                Treasurer and Chief Financial                Officer |

----
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, David G. Gionco, certify that:

|  
|--
|1.
|  
|2.
|  
|3.
|  
|4.

|   
|---
|(a)
|   
|(b)
|   
|(c)
|   
|(d)

|  
|--
|5.

|   
|---
|(a)
|   
|(b)

March 2, 2009

|/s/ DAVIDG. GIONCO
    
    David G. GioncoVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43530-43531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21561]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1183-DR]


Montana; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Montana, (FEMA-1183-DR), dated July 25, 1997, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 4, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency

[[Page 43531]]

Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Montana, is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of July 25, 1997:

Prairie, Roosevelt, and Valley Counties for Public Assistance.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-21561 Filed 8-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Aviation employee featured in new video

By Jonathan Stack

                RICHMOND, Virginia  –              YouTube pageFacebook page

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

aviationacquisitionworkforce
**Exhibit
      32**








**SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350**





I,
      Dennis
      W. Doll, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the periodic report
      being filed herewith containing financial statements fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that information contained in said periodic
      report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of Middlesex Water Company for the period covered by
      said
      periodic report.








/s/
                Dennis W. DollDennis
                W. DollChief
                Executive Officer





Date:  August
      7, 2007








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Middlesex Water Company and will be retained by Middlesex Water Company and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
No. 45379.

#### Protest 959870-G of Howatt Brokerage Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstracts 36724 and 38185 the protest was sustained.
#### CITY OF BATON ROUGE v. Claude CROSS.

No. 60392.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 27, 1977.

In re: Claude Cross applying for writ of certiorari/review and stay order.

Writ denied.

*152i
April 29, 2010

Conference call with Donald Elliott and Brett Cohen, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP Margaret Sheppard and Yaidi Cancel, EPA/Stratospheric Protection Division Donald Elliott is representing Arkema. He mentioned that Honey well has patents on H FO - 1234y f. Mr. Elliott stated that there are concerns about the sufficiency of suppl y of HFO - 1234y f. He suggested that his client may provide EPA information for the public record concerning the cost and availability of HFO - 1234yf.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Aviation celebrates Inventory Management and Stock Positioning

By Joe PhoebusDLA Aviation at Jacksonville

                RICHMOND, Va.  –              
DLA Aviation at Jacksonville Industrial Support Activity Site Commander Navy Commander Maurice Meagher enjoyed a well-earned luncheon Nov. 5 at Naval Air Station Officers Club, Jacksonville, Florida with the entire DLA Aviation team. 

The all-hands luncheon was held to celebrate the two-year anniversary of the deployment of the enterprise’s the Inventory Management and Stock Positioning (IMSP) initiative.  

“I could not be more proud of my team here and the results they have achieved.” said Meagher. “Our involvement with the forward staging and management of material for the Navy Fleet Readiness Center Southeast programs has improved the daily operational support.  We've tackled the task by reviewing demand and supply plans, preventing stock shortages and refining the system.” 

 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

People & CultureDLA Aviation at Jacksonville