alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Gregory RUGON.

No. 60001.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 16, 1977.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writs of review, certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Granted as to paragraph A of relief requested with stay order as to this case. The case is assigned for argument on Monday, June 27, 1977. In all other respects, the writ is denied. The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered. It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Matthew S. Braniff, Judge of the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, prior to June 27, 1977, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained. It is further ordered that the-aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 27th day of June, 1977, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Granted as to paragraph A of relief requested with stay order as to this case. The case is assigned for argument on Monday, June 27, 1977. In all other respects, the writ is denied.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 Docket Nos.North Wind Cooperative
EG07-36-000Besicorp-Empire Power Company, LLC
EG07-37-000Post Oak Wind, LLC
EG07-38-000Bullard Energy Center, LLC
EG07-39-000Diablo Winds, LLC
EG07-40-000Panoche Energy Center, LLC
FC07-7-000Spectra Energy Corporation & Union Gas Limited
FC07-8-000AES TEG/TEP Holding B.V
FC07-9-000Airtricity Holdings Ltd.
FC07-10-000Generadora Montecristo S.A., Enel Guatemala S.A
FC07-11-000
 Take notice that during the month of April 2007, the status of the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators or Foreign Utility Companies became effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a). Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary.


[FR Doc. E7-9684 Filed 5-18-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 152 (Thursday, August 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20818]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 152 / Thursday, August 7, 1997 / 
Notices

[[Page 42481]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. 95-040-5]


Agency Information Collection Activities; OMB Approval Received

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, this notice 
announces the Office of Management and Budget's approval of a 
collection of information contained in the Animal and Plant Health 
Inspection Service final rule amending the regulations pertaining to 
genetically engineered plants introduced under notification and to the 
petition process for the determination of nonregulated status.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Cheryl Jenkins, APHIS Information 
Collection Coordinator, AIM, APHIS, suite 2C42, 4700 River Road Unit 
103, Riverdale, MD 20737-1235, (301) 734-5360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On May 2, 1997, we published in the Federal Register (62 FR 23945-
23958, Docket No. 95-040-2) a final rule amending the regulations at 7 
CFR part 340, ``Genetically Engineered Organisms and Products; 
Simplification of Requirements and Procedures for Genetically 
Engineered Organisms.'' This rule contains information collection 
requirements. On July 24, 1997, the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) approved the collection of information requirements with respect 
to this final rule under OMB control number 0579-0085 (expires 
September 30, 1998).

    Done in Washington, DC, this 1st day of August 1997.
Craig A. Reed,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 97-20818 Filed 8-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0000875

26-AUG-2014

07:54 AM
**Exhibit      32.0**

----

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADDED BY**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of and for the period covered by the                Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                                  Kevin M. McCarthy                                                              |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Kevin                                  M. McCarthy                                                                  |
|   | President                                  and Chief Executive Officer                                              |
|   |                                                                                                                |
|   |                                                                                                                |
|   | /s/                                  Bruce A. Walsh                                                                 |
|   | Bruce                                  A. Walsh                                                                     |
|   | Senior                                  Vice President and Chief Financial                                  Officer |
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43321]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21305]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3575-000]


Boston Edison Company; Notice of Filing

August 7, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 9, 1997, Boston Edison Company of Boston, 
Massachusetts, submitted additional documents in connection with its 
June 30, 1997 tender of a rate schedule in Docket No. ER97-3575-000 for 
the sale of emergency power from the OSP and OSP II units. Boston 
Edison states that it has served copies of its filing on the recipients 
of its June 30, 1997 submission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before August 18, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21305 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 10.34



CONSULTING AGREEMENT



The parties to this Consulting Agreement (Agreement) are Planar Systems, Inc. (Planar) and Balaji Krishnamurthy (Consultant).
Effective date is September 26, 2005.



1. Duties.
Planar engages Consultant to be available for and to provide consulting services and advice on an as needed basis (Services).



2. Term. The term of this Consulting Agreement shall be from the effective date until September 26, 2006.



3. Payment. Consultant agrees to be available for up to two days a
month during the Term to perform Services requested. Planar shall pay Consultant a consulting fee of $4,000.00 per day for each day of Services performed by Consultant at the request of Planar, payable within 10 days of the completion of performance
of the Services. In addition, Consultant will be reimbursed for reasonable travel and incidental expenses incurred in execution of requested Services. Consultant agrees that such compensation will constitute full and complete compensation for
Consultants Services and for all obligations assumed by Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant will be responsible for payment of all income, social security and other taxes assessed against fees paid by Planar to Consultant under the
terms of this Agreement.



4. Reporting to Planars
Facilities. Consultant is not required to report to work at Planars offices during any particular work hours, except for such meetings as may be necessary to deliver Services and/or report on Service delivery progress.



5. Ownership of Copyrights. Any original works of authorship,
including any written, pictorial, graphic or audiovisual work, conceived or created by Consultant under this Agreement shall be the property of Planar, and Consultant hereby assigns and agrees to assign to Planar all of Consultants rights,
including the rights of copyright, in any such work.



6.
Status of Consultant. Consultant agrees that Consultant is an independent contractor and not an employee of Planar, nor subject to the direct supervision or control by Planar, and that Consultant shall not be eligible for Planar employee
benefits.



7. Term and Termination. This Agreement may
be terminated by either party by written notice to the other, with immediate effect, if the other party is in default in the performance of its obligations hereunder or under any outstanding Services or any requirements under the Separation
Agreement and Release dated September 26, 2005.



|                         |  |  |  |                      |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                         |  |  |  | PLANAR SYSTEMS, INC.
|                         |  |  | 
|/s/ Balaji Krishnamurthy |  |  |  | By:                  |  | /s/ Gregory H. Turnbull
|Balaji Krishnamurthy     |  |  |  |                      |  | Gregory H. Turnbull    
|September 26, 2005       |  |  |  |                      |  | Chairman of the Board  



1  CONSULTING AGREEMENT
CONTROL NO. 

§Seattle City Council 


February 26, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

United Stafes~Department of Transportation' 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE ()l 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

As members of the Seattle City Council, we write in strong support of Delta Air Lines' application for 

new passenger services between the Seattle-Tacoma (Sea-Tac) Airport and Tokyo's Haneda Airport. 

Delta has applied for new rights to operate daily service between Sea-Tac Airport and Haneda 

Airport in Tokyo. Seattle is Delta's primary west coast gateway to Asia. Delta's service from Seattle 

to Asia has been successful and enplanements show stronger growth than peer airports in recent 

years. Therefore, service between Seattle and Haneda is a natural addition for Delta's west coast 

gateway. 

Seattle is the hub for the entire Pacific Northwest and Sea-Tac would serve as a convenient 

conne<;ting point to Haneda for customers in 55 US cities. However, Seattle is currently underserved 

to Asia, as indicated by the frequency comparison to other west coast cities which are likely to 

receive new Haneda service. 

WashingtenStatehas strong trade-andbusinessties with Japan, and Delta's newservieeto Haneda 

will create direct and immediate economic benefits for Washington State. Delta estimates that 300 

jobs are created to support each new long-haul transpacific flight. We also understand that DOT 

estimates up to $150 million in annual recurring economic benefits are generated for the affected 

community by a new transpacific route. 

City Hall, 600 Fourth Avenue, Floor 2, PO Box 34025, Seattle, Washington 98124-4025 


(206) 684-8888 Fax: (206) 684-8587 TTY: (206) 233-0025 


http://www.seattle.gov/council 


An EEO employer. Accommodations for people with disabilities provided upon request. 

We urge you to provide the frequencies proposed by Delta to serve Haneda and thank you for your 

consideration, 

Sincerely, 

'm Burgess· 

...-.,.--~~ .---. 

Councilmember Sally J, Clark 

Councilmember Jean Godden Councilmember Bruce A. Harrell 

Councilmember Nick Licata Councilmember Mike O'Brien 

CouncilmemberTom Rasmussen 

Cc: Seattle Port Commissioners 

600 Fourth Avenue, Floor 2, PO Box 34025, Seattle, Washington 98124-4025 


(206) 684-8888 Fax: (206) 684-8587 TTY: (206) 233-0025 


Internet Address: http://www.cityofseattle.gov/council 


An EEO employer. Accommodations for people with disabilities provided upon request.
Exhibit 10.1 - Technology Option Agreement-SECOND EXTENSION.






	MemPore/FirstBingo  	Technology Option Agreement-SECOND EXTENSION  




TECHNOLOGY OPTION AGREEMENT-SECOND EXTENSION

BETWEEN:

MEMPORE CORP.

a corporation under the Canada Business Corporations Act

(“MemPore”)

-and-

SOUTH SHORE RESOURCES INC. (formerly FIRSTBINGO.COM)

a corporation under the law of Nevada, U.S.A.

(The “Developer”)

WHEREAS MemPore and the Developer entered into an Technology Option Agreement (“TOA”) under which the Developer will explore opportunities for commercial use of MemPore’s technology, and the Term of the TOA was defined to be from October 1, 2006 to March 31, 2007, and which was subsequently extended to September 30, 2007;

AND WHEREAS MemPore requires more time to perform its obligations required by the TOA;

THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration (the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by each of the parties hereto), the parties hereto agree as follows:

	     1.      	
The “Term” as defined in the TOA shall be extended until December 31, 2007.


	 
	     2.      	
In all other respects, the parties ratify and confirm the TOA.


	 
	     3.      	
This Agreement shall be incorporated into and form part of the TOA.


	 
	     4.      	
This Agreement may be executed in two counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but both of which together shall constitute a single agreement.


	


IN WITNESS WHEREOF each of the parties hereto has entered into this Agreement as of the date and year of the last signature below:


	MEMPORE CORP.  	SOUTH SHORE RESOURCES INC.  
	per:    TERRY KIMMEL  	per:   RICHARD WACHTER  
	          Terry Kimmel, President  	         Richard Wachter, President  
	Date:  September 26, 2007  	Date: October 9, 2007
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Agencies partner to find IT solutions

By Dianne Ryder

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DISAInformation Operations
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

_________________________________________ )

ALISHIA N. MORRIS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 19

- cv

- 887 (APM)

)

UNITED STATES SE CURITIES )

AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION )

)

Defendants. )

_________________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff Alishia Morris brings this action under the Freedom of Information Act to compel

the Securities and Exchange Comm ission (“SEC”) to produce records that appear to relate to child

custody proceedings in the Texas state courts. See Compl., ECF No. 1, at 5

– 6 (seeking Texas state

court records); Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summ. J., ECF No. 10 [hereinafter

Def.’s Mot.] , Decl. of Jason L uetkenhaus, ECF No. 10

- 2 [hereinafter L uetkenhaus Decl.] , Ex. 1.

The SEC did not conduct a search

, as it knew that the agency would not possess t he type of records

sought

— and it so advised Plaintiff. See L uetkenhaus Decl. ¶¶ 6

– 7. The agency now moves to

dismiss or, alternatively, for summary judgment. See generally Def.’s Mot.

The SEC’s M otion for S ummary J udgment is granted. The agency has sufficiently

explained through a sworn affidavit why it would not possess responsive records. See Military

Audit Project v. Casey , 656 F.2d 724, 738 (D.C. Cir. 1981) (“[I] t is now well established that

summary judgment on the basis of such agency affidavits is warranted if the affidavits describe

the documents and the justifications for nondisclosure with reasonably specific detail

. . . and are2

not controverted by either contrary evidence in the record nor by evidence o f agency bad faith. ”).

Plaintiff offers no reason, and the court cannot think of one, to doubt the agency’s representation.

See id. After all, the SEC is a federal agency whose mission is to protect investors nationwide and

to regulate the securities m arket s

. See L uetkehaus Decl., Ex. 2 , at 12 1 . Thus, t here is no reason to

think that it would possess records concerning a state child custody matter.

Accordingly, Defendant’s M otion for S ummary J udgment

, ECF No. 10, is granted. A final

appealable order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

Dated: September 20 , 2019 Amit P. Mehta

United States District Judge

1 The court uses ECF pagination.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43528]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21536]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5874-6]


Proposed Settlement; Industrial Process Cooling Towers Emission 
Standard Litigation

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Settlement; Request for Public Comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act 
(``Act''), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement of Libbey-
Owens-Ford Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 
No. 95-1141 (D.C. Cir.).
    The case involves a challenge to the rule entitled ``National 
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Industrial Process 
Cooling Towers,'' published in the Federal Register at 59 FR 46,339 on 
September 8, 1994. The proposed settlement provides for EPA to issue a 
revision to the rule allowing sources to demonstrate compliance through 
recordkeeping in lieu of water sample analysis.
    For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication 
of this notice, the Agency will receive written comments to the 
settlement from persons who were not named as parties to the litigation 
in question. EPA or the Department of Justice may withhold or withdraw 
consent to the proposed settlement if the comments disclose facts or 
circumstances that indicate that such consent is inappropriate, 
improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the requirements of the Act. 
Copies of the settlement are available from Gwendolyn Jones, Air and 
Radiation Division (2344), Office of General Counsel, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 
20460, (202) 260-7620. Written comments should be sent to Patricia A. 
Embrey at the above address and must be submitted on or before [insert 
date 30 days after publication].

    Dated: August 4, 1997.
Scott C. Fulton,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-21536 Filed 8-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M