alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21328]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-276-000]


Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation; Notice of Site Visit

August 7, 1997.
    On August 18, 1997, the Office of Pipeline Regulation (OPR) staff 
will inspect, on the ground, locations related to the facilities 
proposed by Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation (Texas Eastern) for 
the Line 1-A Reactivation Project in Chester and Delaware Counties, 
Pennsylvania.
    All interesting parties may attend. OPR staff will depart from the 
existing Texas Eastern Phoenixville/Eagle Compressor Station located at 
560 Pottstown Pike in Uwchland, Pennsylvania at 12:00 noon. OPR staff 
plans to inspect the entire project on August 18, 1997; however, should 
this not be possible, OPR staff will continue the inspection at 8:00 
a.m. the morning of August 19, 1997. Those planning to attend the 
August 18, 1997 site inspection must provide their own transportation.
    For further information, call Mr. Paul McKee, Office of External 
Affairs, at (202) 208-1088.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21328 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1157 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1157

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat gold, silver, 
platinum, and palladium, in either coin or bar form, in the same manner 
as equities and mutual funds for purposes of the maximum capital gains 
                         rate for individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2005

 Mr. Crapo (for himself, Mr. Reid, Mr. Allard, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Craig, 
and Mr. Ensign) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat gold, silver, 
platinum, and palladium, in either coin or bar form, in the same manner 
as equities and mutual funds for purposes of the maximum capital gains 
                         rate for individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Treatment for Precious Metals 
Investors Act''.

SEC. 2. GOLD, SILVER, PLATINUM, AND PALLADIUM TREATED IN THE SAME 
              MANNER AS STOCKS AND BONDS FOR MAXIMUM CAPITAL GAINS RATE 
              FOR INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1(h)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to definition of collectibles gain and loss) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``(as defined in section 408(m) without 
        regard to paragraph (3) thereof)'' in subparagraph (A), and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Collectible.--For purposes of this paragraph, 
                the term `collectible' has the meaning given such term 
                by section 408(m), except that in applying paragraph 
                (3)(B) thereof the determination of whether any bullion 
                is excluded from treatment as a collectible shall be 
                made without regard to the person who is in physical 
                possession of the bullion.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2235 

To prohibit the establishment by air carriers and airport operators of expedited lines at airport screening checkpoints for specific categories of 

passengers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 26, 2012 

Mr. NELSON of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To prohibit the establishment by air carriers and airport 

operators of expedited lines at airport screening checkpoints for specific categories of passengers, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Air Passenger Fairness 

5 Act of 2012’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2235 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ESTABLISHMENT BY AIR CAR2 RIERS AND AIRPORT OPERATORS OF EXPE3 DITED SECURITY LINES FOR SPECIFIC CAT4 EGORIES OF PASSENGERS. 

5 Section 44901 of title 49, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(m) PROHIBITION ON ESTABLISHMENT BY AIR

8 CARRIERS AND AIRPORT OPERATORS OF EXPEDITED SE9 CURITY LINES FOR SPECIFIC CATEGORIES OF PAS10 SENGERS.— 

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para12 graph (2), no air carrier or operator of an airport 

13 may establish an expedited line for a specific cat14 egory of passengers at an airport screening check15 point at which passengers are screened before enter16 ing the sterile area of the airport. 

17 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTIONS.—The prohibition in para18 graph (1) does not apply— 

19 ‘‘(A) to the establishment or operation of 

20 an expedited line at an airport screening check21 point for passengers with a disability (as de22 fined in section 3 of the Americans with Dis23 abilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12102)); or 

24 ‘‘(B) to the establishment or operation of 

25 an expedited security screening program by the 

26 Transportation Security Administration or any 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2235 IS

1 other Federal, State, or local government agen2 cy. 

3 ‘‘(3) STERILE AREA DEFINED.—In this sub4 section, the term ‘sterile area’ has the meaning given 

5 that term in section 1540.5 of title 49, Code of Fed6 eral Regulations (or any corresponding similar regu7 lation or ruling).’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2414 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain porcelain lampholder housings. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

porcelain lamp-holder housings. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PORCELAIN LAMP-HOLDER 

4 HOUSINGS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.30 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 lamp-holder housings of porcelain, containing sockets) is 

8 amended by striking the date in the effective period col9 umn and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2414 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6518

DONALD R. LOHR,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

LEWIS BARLOW,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-98-70)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: August 12, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald R. Lohr, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. Lohr v. Barlow, No. CA-98-70

(E.D. Va. Mar. 26, 1998). Given the disposition of his appeal, Appellant’s Motion for Appeal Bond is now moot and is denied for that

reason. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
GlobalSantaFe Corporation Amendment to Terms and Conditions of Performance Units


 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 GlobalSantaFe Corporation 
 Amendment to 
 Terms and Conditions of Performance Units (2005-2007 Cycle) 
 I consent to the following amendments to
the Terms and Conditions of my outstanding Performance Units (2005-2007 Cycle) (the “Terms & Conditions”) which shall be incorporated as “Exhibit A” to the Terms & Conditions (the “Amendment”).

 1. The definition of Change in Control in the existing Terms & Conditions shall be amended as follows: 
 (a) The third subparagraph of the definition of “Change in Control” shall be amended by removing the language “Approval by the
equityholders of the Company of.” 
 (b) The following new subparagraph shall be added to the end of the definition of “Change in
Control”: 
 “Notwithstanding the foregoing, in order to constitute a Change in Control, such transaction must also constitute a “change in
ownership or effective control” as defined in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.” 
 2. The Terms &
Conditions are modified to provide that notwithstanding anything to the contrary, no Performance Unit is subject to forfeiture upon termination of employment if such termination occurs following the approval by the equityholders of GlobalSantaFe
Corporation of the transaction described in the Merger Agreement executed by GlobalSantaFe Corporation on July 21, 2007. 
 To evidence your acceptance
of these changes, please sign and date this Amendment below and return to Bob Labbe no later than November 8, 2007. 
  

			
	Print Name:	 	  


  

			
	Signature:	 	  


  

			
	Date:
#### Rupert B. HARTMAN, Ethel J. Hartman, and Emil C. Krisch, Appellants, v. W. O. UNSWORTH BUILDERS, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 76-1782.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 4, 1977.

Gary E. Massey of Brock, Massey & Walden, Altamonte Springs, for appellants.

Lawrence R. Steiner of Levine & Cohen, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment in favor of the appellee, W. 0. Unsworth Builders, Inc., for damages for breach of a construction contract and foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien. We find that the record supports the judgment as to damages for breach of contract but does not support the foreclosure of the mechanic’s lien. The record shows that the contract was terminated in January of 1974; but a claim of lien was not filed until August 7,1974, well past the time in which a lien may be filed.

Accordingly, the judgment is reversed in part and affirmed in part and remanded to the trial court with directions to enter judgment in accordance with the terms of this decision.

CROSS, ANSTEAD and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cyberads, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") the undersigned hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: January 30, 2006           CYBERADS, INC.

                                 By: /s/ JEFF CRISWELL
                                 --------------------------
                                 Jeff Criswell, President,
                                 Chief Executive Officer
No. 99-7667.

#### Howard *v.*Pennsylvania.

Sup. Ct. Pa. Cer-tiorari denied.
|     |                                                                                                                       |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                     |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

|          |
|----------|
|          |  |  |  |
| By  | /s/ Robert T. Hass |   |
|     | Robert T. Hass |   |
|     | Executive Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
|     | Amtech Systems, Inc. |   |
|     | Date: | December 1, 2016 |   |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Planar Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gerald K. Perkel, President, Chief
Executive Officer, and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                                                  
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/    GERALD K.
PERKEL                                          
|    |  | Gerald K. Perkel President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director

Date: January 27, 2012
No. 96-8036.

#### Howell *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20705]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-373-002]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

July 31, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 28, 1997, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
(Koch) tendered by filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become effective December 
1, 1997:

Fifth Revised Volume No. 1
Sub Twentieth Revised Sheet No. 20
Sub Seventeenth Revised Sheet No. 21
Sub Eighteenth Revised Sheet No. 22
Sub Twentieth Revised Sheet No. 24
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 719
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 1500
Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 1501

    Koch states that this filing is in compliance with the Commission's 
June 26, 1997, Order Accepting and Suspending Tariff Sheets Subject to 
Refund and Conditions and Establishing Hearing Procedures, 79 FERC 
para. 61,388 (1997), issued in the above captioned docket.
    Koch also states that it has served copies of this filing upon each 
person on the official service list compiled by the Secretary in this 
proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's rules and regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided by Section 154.210 of the Commission's rules and regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20705 Filed 8-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 99-7838.

#### Gallardo *v.*United States Parole Commission.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Floyd W. Pickrell, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Bernard J. Pitz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Floyd W. Pickrell, Jr.
|Floyd W. Pickrell, Jr.,   
|Chief Executive Officer   
|                          
|October 31, 2005          
|                          
|/s/ Bernard J. Pitz       
|Bernard J. Pitz,          
|Chief Financial Officer   



October 31, 2005



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21212]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. OA97-687-000]


Northeast Utilities Service Company; Notice of Filing

August 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 14, 1997, Northeast Utilities Service 
Company (NUSCO) on behalf of the Northeast Utilities (NU) System 
Companies, tendered for filing a revised pro forma open access 
transmission service tariff to satisfy the requirements of the 
Commission's Order No. 888-A. NUSCO also tendered for filing revisions 
to Supplement No. 1 to the NU System Companies' Open Access 
Transmission Service Tariff that correspond to the changes to the pro 
forma tariff.
    NUSCO states that the effective date of the revised transmission 
tariff and Supplement No. 1 will be July 14, 1997 in accordance with 
Order No. 888-A.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before August 19, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21212 Filed 8-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Docket Number: FAA-2011-0718
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20385]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


The University of Houston, et al.; Notice of Consolidated 
Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscopes

    This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 
(Pub. L. 89-651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be 
viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    Docket Number: 97-042. Applicant: The University of Houston, 
Houston, TX 77204. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model JEM-2010F. 
Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 62 FR 
32766, June 17, 1997. Order Date: March 3, 1997.

    Docket Number: 97-045. Applicant: Baylor University, Waco, TX 
76798-7088. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model JEM-1010. 
Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 62 FR 
32766, June 17, 1997. Order Date: March 24, 1997.

    Docket Number: 97-048. Applicant: Kansas State University, 
Manhattan, KS 66506-4901. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model CM100. 
Manufacturer: Philips, The Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 62 
FR 34691, June 27, 1997. Order Date: March 27, 1997.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as these instruments are intended to be used, was being 
manufactured in the United States at the time the instruments were 
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is a conventional 
transmission electron microscope (CTEM) and is intended for research or 
scientific educational uses requiring a CTEM. We know of no CTEM, or 
any other instrument suited to these purposes, which was being 
manufactured in the United States at the time of order of each 
instrument.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 97-20385 Filed 7-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P