alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1200 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the depreciation 

recovery period for certain roof systems. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 8, 2005 

Mr. BUNNING (for himself, Mr. TALENT, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. DEMINT, and 

Mr. LOTT) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce 

the depreciation recovery period for certain roof systems.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Realistic Roofing Tax 

5 Treatment Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEPRECIATION RECOVERY PERIOD FOR CERTAIN 

7 ROOF SYSTEMS. 

8 (a) 20-YEAR RECOVERY PERIOD.—Subparagraph 

9 (F) of section 168(e)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
2

•S 1200 IS

1 1986 (relating to classification of certain property) is 

2 amended to read as follows: 

3 ‘‘(F) 20-YEAR PROPERTY.—The term ‘20-

4 year property’ includes— 

5 ‘‘(i) initial clearing and grading land 

6 improvements with respect to any electric 

7 utility transmission and distribution plant, 

8 and 

9 ‘‘(ii) any roof system which meets the 

10 requirements of Standard 90.1-2004 of the 

11 American Society of Heating, Refrig12 erating, and Air Conditioning Engineers.’’. 

13 (b) REQUIREMENT TO USE STRAIGHT LINE METH14 OD.—Paragraph (3) of section 168(b) of the Internal Rev15 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

16 following new subparagraph: 

17 ‘‘(I) Any roof system described in sub18 section (e)(3)(F)(ii).’’. 

19 (c) ALTERNATIVE SYSTEM.—The table contained in 

20 section 168(g)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

21 1986 is amended by striking the last item and inserting 

22 the following new items:

‘‘(F)(i) ............................................................................................. 25

(F)(ii) .............................................................................................. 20.’’. 
3

•S 1200 IS

1 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

3 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# IH employees get the bigger picture during DLA Distribution visit

By Janeen HayesDLA Troop Support Public Affairs

                NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA DistributionIndustrial HardwareDLA Troop Support
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-15-00179-CR

____________________

IN RE BRYAN CHANCE MCBEE

_________________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding 

_________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Bryan Chance McBee petitioned for a writ of mandamus compelling the

judge of the 221st District Court of Montgomery County to require the court 

coordinator to set for hearing McBee’s motion for a loan of the duplicate record 

that was prepared for an appeal. See generally Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(g), 34.6(h). 

McBee does not contend that the trial court retains plenary power over the criminal

case.

1

There is no active habeas proceeding; accordingly, this Court has mandamus 

jurisdiction. See Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist., 392 S.W.3d 115, 

 1

We issued a mandate of affirmance in July 2014. See generally McBee v. 

State, No. 09-13-00232-CR, 2014 WL 1400656, at *5 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Apr. 

9, 2014, pet. ref’d) (mem. op.) (affirming judgment as modified). 
2

117-18 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). However, the mandamus petition lacks certified or 

sworn copies of “every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief[.]” 

See Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(1). McBee suggests he cannot provide copies of 

documents because he is a prisoner. McBee also failed to provide proof of service 

on the respondent and the prosecuting attorney. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5. 

The petition nevertheless demonstrates that McBee is not entitled to 

mandamus relief because he has not shown that he has a clear and indisputable 

right to the requested relief. See In re Williams, No. 09-09-00584-CV, 2010 WL 

183861, at *1 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Jan. 21, 2010, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); 

see also In re Cash, No. 06-04-00045-CV, 2004 WL 769473, at *1 (Tex. App.—

Texarkana Apr.13, 2004, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (A trial court has no duty to 

rule on “free-floating motions unrelated to currently pending actions.”). 

The relator has not shown that he is entitled to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

PETITION DENIED.

 

 PER CURIAM

Submitted on May 26, 2015

Opinion Delivered May 27, 2015

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
----

----

| 1.  | The      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934, as amended; and |
|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the LP. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 1,      2008                                                                                                   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                                             |   |   |
| /s/      Michael A. Reisner                                                                                                      |   |   |
| Michael      A. Reisner                                                                                                          |   |   |
| Co-Chief      Executive Officer and Co-PresidentICON      Capital Corp.General      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight BL.P. |
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21349]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Golden Gate National Recreation Area; Operation of a Food and 
Gift Shop

SUMMARY: The National Park Service will be releasing a concession 
Prospectus to continue the operation of the Cliff House Restaurant and 
Gift Shop. This is a year-round restaurant and gift shop business 
operating within Golden Gate National Recreation Area. This operation 
provides different levels of food service, from delicatessen and sit 
down style to fine dining service. Within the same structure is a gift 
shop operation providing visitors with assorted souvenirs items. The 
annual gross receipts average about $8 million. The new contract will 
be for twenty (20) years. The new contract requires a major renovation 
program of the existing structure with an estimated cost of $8 million. 
There is an existing concessioner which has operated satisfactorily 
under the existing contract and has a right of preference in renewal.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The cost for purchasing a Prospectus is 
$30.00. Parties interested in obtaining a copy should send a check, NO 
CASH, payable to ``National Park Service'' to the following address: 
National Park Service, Office of Concession Program Management, Pacific 
Great Basin Support Office, 600 Harrison Street, Suite 600, San 
Francisco, CA 94107-1372. The front of the envelope should be marked 
``Attention: Office of Concession Program Management--Mail Room Do Not 
Open.'' Please include a mailing address indicating where to send the 
prospectus. Inquiries may be sent to Ms. Teresa Jackson, Office of 
Concession Program Management at (415) 427-1369.

    Dated: August 5, 1997.
John J. Reynolds,
Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 97-21349 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
Exhibit 32









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Annual Report of Franklin Wireless Corp. (the "Company")  on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30,  2011,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, OC Kim, Chief Executive  Officer  and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Date: September 28, 2011




/s/ OC KimOC KimPresident and Acting Chief Financial Officer
#### Bierly, Appellant, *v.*Sener.

*Equity*— Trusts *and trustees*— Findings *of fact*— Review.

Findings of fact by the court below adverse to a complainant in a bill in equity for a declaration of trust will not be reversed by the appellate court whore such findings of fact although based upon disputed testimony are not manifestly erroneous.

Argued April 19, 1910.

Appeal, No. 366, Jan. T., 1909, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Clearfield Co., Dec. T., 1908, No. 3, dismissing bill in equity in case of John II. Bierly v. W. Z. Sener.

Before Fell, C. J., Brown, Mestrezat, Potter and Stewart, JJ.

Affirmed.

Bill in equity to declare a trust in real estate. Before A. O. Smith, P. J.

*Errors assigned*were in dismissing exceptions to adjudication, and in dismissing the bill.

*C. S. McCormick,*for appellant.

*290May 16, 1910:

*D. L. Krebs,*of *Krebs & IAveright,*with him *W. A. Hagerty,*for appellee.

Per Curiam,

This bill was for the declaration of a trust as to real estate, an accounting and a reconveyance. The plaintiff’s case rested entirely upon a writing alleged by him to have been signed by the defendant. All of the material allegations of the bill were denied in the answer and it was found by the court that the testimony produced by the plaintiff was wholly insufficient in character, clearness and credibility to overcome the effect of the answer and to establish a trust relation. If this finding stands it is conclusive against the plaintiff. It must stand unless clearly shown to be erroneous. It has been repeatedly said that a finding of fact by the court, from disputed testimony, will not be set aside unless error is manifest. The finding in this case was the result of a painstaking and intelligent effort to arrive at the truth and we find no reason to doubt its correctness.

The decree dismissing the bill is affirmed at the plaintiff’s cost.
Exhibit 23





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








The Board of Directors and Stockholders


Investors Title Company


Chapel Hill, North Carolina








We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-109279, 333-161209, 333-33903) of Investors Title Company (the “Company”) of our report dated March 9, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Investors Title Company, which report appears in Investors Title Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.








/s/ Dixon Hughes PLLC


High Point, North Carolina


March 9, 2011
Exhibit 32.1 - SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Absolute Glass Protection, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").
I, John Dean Harper, Chairman and President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.


/s/ John Dean Harper
----------------------------
    John Dean Harper
    Chairman and President


Date  August 18, 2003
      ---------------



<PAGE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________

)

GREGORY W. HORTON, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 08-0548 (PLF)

)

U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, )

)

 Respondent. )

____________________________________)

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is

ORDERED that the Order to show cause [Dkt. No. 15] is DISCHARGED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [Dkt. No.

1] is DENIED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. This is a final appealable

Order. See Rule 4(a), Fed. R. App. P.

SO ORDERED.

/s/________________________

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

DATE: September 21, 2009 United States District Judge
DISMISSED; Opinion Filed April 3, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-18-01469-CV

STACY HAMPTON, Appellant

V.

SIR BELMONT APTS. LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-06027-D

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle

Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness

The clerk’s record in this case is past due. By letter dated January 30, 2019, we informed 

appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. 

We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s 

record or to provide written documentation appellant had been found entitled to proceed without 

payment of costs within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the 

dismissal of this appeal without further notice. That notice was returned to the court as 

undeliverable. The clerk’s office then left appellant a voice message directing appellant to update 

her mailing address. To date, appellant has not provided the required documentation, updated her 

mailing address, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 
–2–

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

181469F.P05

/Robbie Partida-Kipness/

ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

STACY HAMPTON, Appellant

No. 05-18-01469-CV V.

SIR BELMONT APTS. LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 4, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-06027-D.

Opinion delivered by Justice PartidaKipness. Justices Bridges and Carlyle 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee SIR BELMONT APTS. LLC recover its costs of this 

appeal from appellant STACY HAMPTON.

Judgment entered this 3rd day of April, 2019.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 126 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 126

To improve the administration of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection 
   Service of the Department of Agriculture, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2005

 Mrs. Lincoln introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To improve the administration of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection 
   Service of the Department of Agriculture, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of Agriculture, acting through the Administrator of the 
        Service.
            (2) Service.--The term ``Service'' means the Animal and 
        Plant Health Inspection Service of the Department of 
        Agriculture.
    (b) Exemption.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any 
migratory bird management carried out by the Secretary shall be exempt 
from the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et 
seq.) (including regulations).
    (c) Permits; Management.--An agent, officer, or employee of the 
Service that carries out any activity relating to migratory bird 
management may, under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 et 
seq.)--
            (1) issue a depredation permit to a stakeholder or 
        cooperator of the Service; and
            (2) manage and take migratory birds.
                                 <all>
```
Before the Second Division,

April 29, 1942,

No. 47129.

#### Protests 957981-G, etc., of New Victoria Importing Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the rugs in question are similar in all material respects to the cotton rugs the subject of Abstracts 34621 and 35549. In accordance therewith certain of the -'articles in question, were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 921, and others at 20 percent under paragraph 921 and T. D. 47600 as claimed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries III, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 2, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries III, Inc.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Energy empowers service member through Operation Warfighter Program

By Elizabeth StoeckmannDLA Energy Public Affairs

                FORT BELVOIR, Virginia  –              *This is the second article in a series of DLA Energy workforce development opportunities.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

OWPOperation Warfighter Programwounded warriorSRMSustainment Restoration and ModernizationDefense Fuel Support Point ManagementDLA Energy