i United States of America

Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Washington, D.C.

Regulatory Docket No. ____________

PETITION FOR THE EXEMPTION OF:

MOSHER THOMAS L.L.C.

FROM THE REQUIR E MENTS OF 14 C.F .R. Part 21 , §§43.3, 43.5, 91.10 7, 91.9, 91.119, 91.151, 91.203 (a) and (b), 91.405, 91.407, and 91.409, CONCERNING OPERATIONS OF

UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYS TEMS OVER THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

, PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT

OF 2012

J OHNSON & L INDBERG , P.A.

Submitted June 5 , 2015 Michael C. Lindberg Attorney for Mosher Thomas L.L.C.

780 Northland Plaza

3800 American Boulevard West Minneapolis, MN 55431

- 4459 (952) 851

- 0700 Direct: (952) 956

- 6200 mlindberg@johnsonlindberg.comII Table of Contents

Page

Glossary and Abbreviations

................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 1

Sum mary

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 2

Introduction and Interests of Petitioner

................................ ................................ ........................... 2

Equipment and Aircraf

t

................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 2

Basis for P etition

................................ ................................ ................................ ............................. 6

The Petitioner

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 6

FAR Exemptions Sought, Extent, and Reasons

................................ ................................ .............. 6

W hy Grant of Exemption Would be in Public Interest

................................ ............................... 12

Why Grant of Exemption Would not Adversely Affect Safety

................................ ................... .12

Summary for Federal Register

................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 131 Abbreviations

ADM Aeronautical Decision Making

AGL Above Ground Level

ATC Air Traffic Contro l

FAA Federal Aviation Administration

FAR Federal Aviation Regulation

GCS Ground Control Station

GHz Gigahertz

LZ Landing Zone

MTI Mosher Thomas Industries L.L.C

NAS National Airspace System

NM Nautical Mile

PIC Pilot I n Command

POH Pilots Operating Handbook

RAIM Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring

§ 333 FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333

SIC Second In Command

SMS Safety Management System

SOG Standard Operating Guidelines

UA S Unmanned Aircraft System

UA Unmanned Aircraft

UAV Unmanned Aircraft Vehicle

VFR Visual Flight Rules

VLOS Visual Line Of Sight

VMC Visual Meteorological Condition

VO Visual Observer2 SUMMARY

Mosher Thomas Industries L.L.C. seeks exemption fr om the requirements of § 14 C.F .R. Part 21

and 14 C.F.R. § 43.3

, § 43.5 , §61.113(a) & (b), §61.133(a), §91.9(b)(2), § 91.119 , §91.151(a), §91.203(a) & (b), §91.405(a),§91.407(a)(1), § 91.409(a)(2), and § 91.417(a). This exemption will permit M osher Thomas Industries L.L.C (MTI ) to operate Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) in the National Airspace System (NAS) while keeping any required documents by regulation at the ground control station (GCS) and within immediate accessibility of the pilot in c ommand (PIC).

In addition , this exemption will also permit M TI L.L.C. to operate UAS with the req uired aircraft markings as large as possible. Furthermore, this exemption will permit MTI L.L.C. to operate

UAS without airworthiness certificates for its UAS

.

INTRODUCTION AND INT ERESTS OF THE PETITI ONER

Mosher Thomas Industries L.L.C. (hereinafter MTI ) i s a company established by three pilots. One pilot was a Lieutenant Colone l in the Air F orce Reserve in Duluth, Minnesota. With a career in the military for over 20 years, he flew F

- 16s, T

- 38s, MQ

- 1s, MQ

- 9s and served as a military

instructor . He has logged many hours as PIC in the military for UAS and has worked as an

instructor at the Uni versity of North Dakota in its UAS program. He is currently employed at Northrop Grumm a n as a test pilot in a UAS project. The ot her two pilots are graduates of Lake Superior C ollege in the professional helicopter p rogram, where they received training on the procedures of UAS launch and recovery, data uplink and downlink, rul es and regulations and aeronautical decision making. All three p ilots hold a current Class Two medical c ertificate s granted by a FAA medical examiner.

MTI intends to use UAS in the NAS with a well

- form ulat ed and strictly

- enforced set of guidelines and pro tocols in making the integration of UAS in the NAS as safe as , if not safer than, current manned aircraft. As set for th in this petition, MTI see ks to operate its Blade 350 QX

and W alkeria Tali H500 for purposes of aerial surveying, search and resc ue, new construction

management , land management, surveillance, and aerial photography.

EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRA FT

Unmanned Aircraft System: Blade 350 QX

MTI seeks exemption to operate a Blade 350 QX UAS for compensation or hire within the NAS

. The Blade 350 QX , pictu red below at Figure 1

, is a VTOL (vertical takeoff and landing) UAS with skid type landing gear. It is powered by a lithium p olymer battery that runs four electric

Multistar brushless motors that are capable of producing flight for a total of approximately 15

minutes. The Blade 350 QX weighs less than 4 pounds with the camera and gimbal attached. It

has dimensions of 18.3 in ches by 18.3 inches by 5.43 inches . It is operated by a Spektrum DX5e

transmitter , pictured below at figure 2

, that transmits on the 2. 4 GHz bandwidth.3

The Blade 350 QX is capable of flying in three different m odes: Figure 1: The Blade 350 QX

Fi gure 2: The DX5e Transmitter4

 Smart Mode (Green Mode)

- This mode provides a position hold when control input s are at a neutral position, utilizing a self

- leveling feature which brings the B l ade 350 QX to a

level attitude. The altitude is relative to throttle position. In this mode , it is considered to

be a “tethered UAV

, ” meaning that when the operator pushes the control stick away from him/her, the Blade 350 QX will move away from the opera tor regardless of the direction the front is facing.

 Stability Mode (Blue Mode)

– This mode is similar to Smart Mode, but instead of moving as if it were “tethered”, the Blade 350 QX will follow control inputs based on the

orientation of the UAV. In this m ode it has all of the functions that Smart Mode offers.

 Agility Mode (Red Mode)

– This mode is will never be used in any circumstance and to ensure this, the transmitter is programmed to only operate in Smart mode and Stability

Mode.

Lost Link Facts and P

rocedures

The Blade 350 QX has flashing light sequences and series of beeps to indicate lost link from transmitter and GPS signal lost. If the Blade 350 QX loses GPS signal during flight, it will default to “Stability Mode” and still will allow the operato r to continue to operate the UAV. The Blade 350 QX has a safety feature built into the software that utilizes a GPS signal to automatically land if the UAV loses transmitter signal. Upon losing a transmitter signal, the Blade 350 QX will do one of five opt ions. If the motors are not turning, the 350 QX will disarm. When the motors are turning but the Blade 350 QX is not flying, it will turn of the motors and disarm. If the Blade 350 QX is flying and has a good GPS lock with a home position set, it will

acti vate the “Return Home” function upon the loss of the transmitter signal. “Return Home” is set prior to flight and is the location where the Blade 350 QX takes off from. If the compass is not connected or faulty, or if there is no GPS lock, the Blade 350 QX will descend slowly upon the loss of transmission signal. If the pressure sensor is not working, the Blade 350 QX will reduce power to initialize a controlled descent upon the loss of transmission signal. MTI will ensure that GPS signal will be available based off of location and time by doing a RAIM (Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring) check before every flight at the location and time of proposed flight. MTI has done its own research into lost link procedures and capabilities of the Blade 350 QX. M TI will ensure before every flight, that should a lost link between the Blade 350 QX and the transmitter happen and when a lost link procedure is initiated, that it will do harm to people or property on its way back th e LZ (Landing Zone). MTI will never fl y indoors and under dense vegetation. To ensure that the Blade 350 QX will not have a fau lty internal compass, MTI will recalibrate the compass as stated in the manufacturer manual

.

Proven Operation History of the Blade 350 QX

MTI has operated the Blade 35 0 QX at a test site in Northern Minnesota underneath 400 AGL, not within 5 NM of any airport or runway

, and not in a populated area. MTI has flown over 50 hours on the DX5e transmitter and Blade 350 QX with more than 2 50 battery cycles on two 2200

mah and two 3000 mah lithium polym er batteries. MTI has been accident free with the Blade 350 QX from October 10, 2014 to the present in all practice phases of flight.5

Unmanned Aircraft System: Tali H500

The Tali H500 operation is substantially similar to that of the Blade 350 QX. MTI will fully comply with the manufacturer’s operations manual. It is pictured below at Figure 3. The Devo F12E transmitter is pictured below at Figure 4.

Figure 3 : The Tali H500

Figure 4 : The Devo F12E Transmitter6 BASIS FOR PETITION

P ursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 C.F.R. §11.61) and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, Special Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Petitioner Mosher Thomas Industries L.L.C

. hereby petitions the Administrator for an exemption from the requirements of §14 C.F.R. Part 21 and 14 C.F.R. §43.3, §43.5, §61.113(a) & (b), § 61.133(a), §91.9(b)(2), §91.119 , §91.151(a), §91.203(a) & (b), §91.405(a), §91.407(a)(1), §91.409(a)(2), and §91.417(a)

. In accordance with 14 C.F.R. §11.81, MTI provides the following information in support of its petition for exemption:

A. Name and Address of Petitioner

Mosher Thomas Industries L.L.C.

115 Summer St reet S outh Pierz, Minnesota 56364

The point of contact is:

Mackenzie A. Thomas

115 Summer St reet S outh Pierz, Minnesota 56364

Tel: 320

- 237

- 4522

Email: mathomas6976@hotmail.com

B. Federal Aviation Regulations From Which MTI Seeks Exemption

1. MTI Seeks Exemption from t h e Requirements Of Part 21 for t he Blade 350QX and Tali H500

In accordance with Section 333 of the FAA Modernization Act of 2012 and 14 C.F.R. §21.16, Special Conditions , MTI seeks to exempt the Blade 350 QX and Tali H500 UAS from the restricted category air worthiness certification specified in 14 C.F.R. §21.185, or the requirement to have a certificate of airworthiness issued, as contemplated by 14 C.F.R. part 21. Section 21.185

, entitled Issue of airworthiness certificates for restricted category aircraft, states the following in

part:

(a) Aircraft manufactured under a production certificate or type certificate. An applicant for the original issue of a restricted category airworthiness certificate for an aircraft type certificated in the restricted category, t hat was not previously type certificated in any other category, must comply with the appropriate provisions of § 21.183

.

Extent and Reason Relief is Sought: MTI requests to be exempt from the airworthiness certificate requirement for the Blade 350 QX and the Tali H500 because the FAA has not yet type certificated either UAS. MTI proposes that for the purpose of conducting commercial operations, there will be a Safety Management System (SMS) in place and specific Standard Operating Guidelines (SOGs).7 2. MTI S eeks Exemption From The Requirements O f § 43.3, Persons Authorized to Perform Maintenance, Prevent ive Maintenance, Rebuilding, and

Alterations

. S ubsection (b) states :

(b) The holder of a mechanic certificate may perform maintenance, preventive maintenance , and alterations as provided in Part 65 of this chapter.

Extent and Reason Relief is Sought: Relief is requested because there are no FAA certified mechanics to do maintenance on the Blade 350 QX or Tali H500.

MTI ha s a Chief Technical Officer who does al l in

- house maintenance. The Chief Technical Officer is a rated Private Pilot. Therefore MTI proposes that the Chief Technical Officer will be the individual that will sign the Blade 350 QX and Tali

H500 for a return to service.

3. MTI Seeks Exemption F rom Th e Requirements Of §43.5, Approval For Return To Service After Maintenance, Preventative Maintenance, Rebuilding,

Or Alteration. Section 43.5 states:

No person may approve for return to service any aircraft, airframe, aircraft engine, propeller, or applian ce, that has undergone maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless

— (a) The maintenance record entry required by §43.9 or §43.11, as appropriate, has been made; (b) The repair or alteration form authorized by or furnished by the Administrator has been executed in a manner prescribed by the Administrator; and (c) If a repair or an alteration results in any change in the aircraft operating limitations or flight data contained in the approved aircraft flight manual, those operating limitations or flight data are appropriately revised and set forth as prescribed in §91.9 of this chapter.

Extent and Reason Relief is Sought: Relief is requested because MT I has a

Chief Technical Officer who signs off each UAS after maintenance as airwo rthy

before it is returned to service. MTI utilizes log book s for the Blade 350 QX and

the Tali H500

. All maintenan ce logs books will be dated, describe the maintenance performed

, and be signed by the Chief Technical Officer. MTI proposes that all mainten ance log books will be kept in the GSC, where the PIC

will have access to them.

4. MTI Seeks Exemption From The Requirem ents Of § 91.107, Use Of Safety Belts, Shoulder Harnesses, And Child Restraint Systems

. Section 91.107 states:

(a) Unless otherwise autho rized by the Administrator

— (1) No pilot may take off a U.S.

- registered civil aircraft

... unless the pilot in command of that aircraft ensures that each person on board is8 briefed on how to fasten and unfasten that person’s safety belt and, if installed, sh oulder harness. (2) No pilot may cause to be moved on the surface, take off, or land a

U.S.

- registered civil aircraft

... unless the pilot in command of that aircraft ensures that each person on board has been notified to fasten his or her safety belt and, if installed, his or her shoulder harness.

Extent and Reason Relief is Sought: MTI seeks full relief from requirement of § 91.107 because there i s no pilot or other person on board the Blade 350 QX or Tali H500, so there is no need for any crewmember or pe rson to wear a seatbelt or

shoulder harness.

5. MTI Seeks Exemption From The Req uirements Of § 91.9, Civil Aircraft Flight Manual, Marking, And Placard Requirements

. Section 91.9 states: (a) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, no person may operate a civil aircraft without complying with the operating limitations specified in the approved Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual, markings, and placards, or as otherwise prescribed by the certificating authority of the country of registry. (b) No person may operate a U.S.

- registered civil aircraft

— (1) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is required by §21.5 of this chapter unless there is available in the aircraft a current, approved Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual or the manua l provided for in §121.141(b); and (2) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is not required by §21.5 of this chapter, unless there is available in the aircraft a current approved Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual, approved manual material, markings, and placards, or any combination thereof. (c) No person may operate a U.S.

- registered civil aircraft unless that aircraft is identified in accordance with part 45 of this chapter.

Extent and Reason Relief is Sought: MTI seeks relief from section 91.9 because the Blade 350 QX and the Tali H500 weigh under ten pounds and cannot carry the approved Airplane Flight Manual onboard. Since the Blade 350 QX and Tali H500 are unmanned aircraft, MTI proposes the following conditions and

limitations to its r equest for exemption from section 91.9:

The Flight Manual for each UAS will be in reach of the PIC at the GCS during all flights, where it will readily available for reference by the PIC or any aircrew or ground crew member.

6. MTI Seeks Exemption From The Requirements of § 91.119, Minimum Safe

Altitudes: General. Section 91.119 states:

Except when necessary for takeoff or landing, no person may operate an aircraft below the following altitudes:9 (a) Anywhere. An altitude allowing, if a power unit fails, an emergency landing without undue hazard to persons or property on the surface. (b) Over congested areas. Over any congested area of a city, town, or settlement, or over any open air assembly of persons, an altitude of 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal radius of 2,000 feet of

the aircraft. (c) Over other than congested areas. An altitude of 500 feet above the surface, except over open water or sparsely populated areas. In those cases, the aircraft may not be operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure.

Extent and Reason Relief is Sought: Full relief is requested because MTI cannot fly at least 500 feet AGL, or 1000 feet above the highest obstacle within 2000 feet horizontally due to the FAA restrictions on UAS

, limiting flight above 400 feet

AGL.

7. MTI Seeks Exemption From The Requi rements Of § 91.151, Fuel Requirements For Flight In VFR Conditions. Section 91.151 states:

(a) No person may begin a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless (consid ering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed

— (1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after that for at l east 45 minutes. (b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 20 minutes.

Extent and Reason Relief is Sought: MTI seeks full relief because the Blade 350 QX and the Tali H500 do not use fuel to operate. Since they operate with battery power, MTI proposes the following limitations and conditi ons to its request for exemption from Section 91.151:

MTI will land immediately at the designated LZ when the battery power reaches

25%.

8. MTI Seeks Exem ption From The Requirements Of § 91.203 (a) and (b)

, Civil Aircraft: Certifications Required. Section 91. 203 states:

(a) Except as provided in §91.715, no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it has within it the following: (1) An appropriate and current airworthiness certificate. Each U.S. airworthiness certificate used to comply with this subparagr aph (except a special flight permit, a copy of the applicable operations specifications issued under §21.197(c) of this chapter, appropriate sections of the air carrier manual required by parts 121 and 135 of this chapter containing10 that portion of the ope rations specifications issued under §21.197(c), or an authorization under §91.611) must have on it the registration number assigned to the aircraft under part 47 of this chapter. However, the airworthiness certificate need not have on it an assigned specia l identification number before 10 days after that number is first affixed to the aircraft. A revised airworthiness certificate having on it an assigned special identification number, that has been affixed to an aircraft, may only be obtained upon applicati on to an FAA Flight Standards district

office. (2) An effective U.S. registration certificate issued to its owner or, for operation within the United States, the second copy of the Aircraft registration Application as provided for in §47.31(c), or a regis tration certification issued under the laws of a foreign country. (b) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless the airworthiness certificate required by paragraph (a) of this section or a special flight authorization issued under §91.715 is displayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so that it is legible to passengers or crew.

Extent and Reason Relief is Sought: MTI requests full exemption from 91.203 (a) and (b) because the Blade 350 QX and Tali H500 fully loaded weigh no more

than 55 lbs and are ope rated without an onboard pilot. As such, there is no ability or place to carry certification and registration documents or to display them on the UAS. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by keeping these documents at the ground control point whe re the pilot flying the UAS will have immediate

access to them.

9. MTI Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of § 91.405

, Maintenance Required. Section 91.405 states:

Each owner or operator of an aircraft

— (a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescrib ed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter; (b) Shall ensure that maintenance personnel make appropriate en tries in the aircraft maintenance records indicating the aircraft has been approved for return to service; (c) Shall have any inoperative instrument or item of equipment, permitted to be inoperative by §91.213(d)(2) of this part, repaired, replaced, remov ed, inspected at the next required inspection; and (d) When listed discrepancies include inoperative instruments or equipment, shall ensure that a placard has been installed as required by §43.11 of this chapter.

Extent and Reason Relief is Sought: MTI s eeks relief from § 91.405

, § 91.407,

and § 91.409 because there are no FAA certified mechanics to do inspections on the Blade 350 QX and Tali H500. MTI proposes that the Chief Technical Officer

will do all maintenance on th e Blade 350 QX and Tali H500 in acco rdance with11 the manufacture r ’s manual. The C hief Technical Officer holds a private pilot’s license and is one of the owners/operators. MTI will maintain maintenance log books and will due a full inspection every 5 0 hours of operation on the UAS s.

10. MTI Se eks Exemption From T he Requirements Of § 91.407, Operation After Maintenance, Preventative Maintenance, Rebuilding, Or Alteration. Section

91.407 states:

(a) No person may operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuildi ng, or alteration unless

— (1) It has been approved for return to service by a person authorized under §43.7 of this chapter; and

(2) The maintenance record entry required by §43.9 or §43.11, as applicable, of this chapter has been made.

(b) No person ma y carry any person (other than crewmembers) in an aircraft that has been maintained, rebuilt, or altered in a manner that may have appreciably changed its flight characteristics or substantially affected its operation in flight until an appropriately rated pilot with at least a private pilot certificate flies the aircraft, makes an operational check of the maintenance performed or alteration made, and logs the flight in the

aircraft records.

(c) The aircraft does not have to be flown as required by paragra ph (b) of this section if, prior to flight, ground tests, inspection, or both show conclusively that the maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration has not appreciably changed the flight characteristics or substantially affected the fli ght operation of the aircraft.

Extent and Reason Relief is Sought: See description in paragraph 9,

above.

11. MTI Seeks Exemption From The Requirements of S ection § 91.409 (a) and (b), Inspections

. S ection 91.409 (a) and (b) state :

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate an aircraft unless, within the preceding 12 calendar months, it

has had

— (1) An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 of this chapter and has been approved for return to service by a person autho rized by §43.7 of this chapter; or

(2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in accordance with part 21 of this chapter. No inspection performed under paragraph (b) of this section may be substituted for any inspection required by this paragraph unless it is performed by a person authorized to perform annual inspections and is entered as an ‘‘annual’’ inspection in the required maintenance records.12 (b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may

operate an a ircraft carrying any person (other than a crewmember) for hire, and no person may give flight instruction for hire in an aircraft which that person provides, unless within the preceding 100 hours of

time in service the aircraft has received an annual or 10 0

- hour inspection and been approved for return to service in accordance with part 43 of this chapter or has received an inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in accordance with part 21 of this chapter. The 100

- hour limitation may be exceeded by not more than 10 hours while en route to reach a place where the inspection can be done. The excess time used to reach a place where the inspection can be done must be included in computing the next 100 hours of time in service.

Extent and Rea son Relief is Sought: See description in paragraph 9,

above.

C. The Reasons Why Granting MTI’s Request Would Be In The Public Interest; That Is, How It Would Benefit The Public As A Whole.

Low

- altitude UAS flights take the place of inherently more hazardous manned operations to do aerial photography, search and rescue, crop management, surveillance and land

management , thus producing a net safety benefit. MTI is capable of producing a level of safety that is equal to, or safer than

, manned aircraft. With no fuel on board and w eighing less than ten pounds , there is less physical potential for collateral damage to life and property on the ground and in the air than a manned aircraft. The Blade 350 QX and the

Tali H500 UASs are battery powered

, which is more sa fe, more economical

, and more

efficient than current manned aircraft that use combustible fuels. This w ill help reduce levels of air and noise pollution compared to having a manned aircraft conduct the same

missions

. An exemption allowing MTI to use the U ASs in the NAS will be a step in the direction of greatly reducing air tra ffic and congestion at airports

, since the Blade 350 QX and Tali H500 do not need to take

- off or land at an airport.

MTI’s use of UAS s in the NAS would contribute to economic growth of the United States by filling the increa sing need for aerial inspection and photography

. Approval of

UASs will allow for new companies to emerge and create competition in the market, which will ultimately make services less expensive for the public.

D. The Reasons Why Granting The Exemption Would Not Adversely Affect Safety, Or How The Exemption Would Provide A Level Of Safety At Least Equal To That Provided By The Rule From Which You Seek The Exemption.

The UASs will be operated by licensed pilots in strict compliance with the terms of the conditions and limitations imposed by the FAA, the Federal Aviation Regulations, the manufacturers’ manuals, and the applicant’s Safety Management System (SMS) and specific Standard Operating Guidelines (SOGs). Airworthiness will be assured by insp ections performed by a knowledgable Chief Technical Officer. Hazards to personnel on board aircraft are eliminated completely.13

E. A Summary That Can Be Published In The Federal Register

MTI seeks exemption from:

14 C.F.R. Part 4 1

14 C.F.R . 43.3

14 C.F.R. 43.5

14 C.F.R . 61.113

14 C.F.R . 61.133

14 C.F.R. 91.9

14 C.F.R. 91.119

14 C.F.R . 151 14 C.F.R. 91.203 (a) & (b)

14 C.F.R. 91.405

14 C.F.R. 91.407

14 C.F.R. 91.409

This exemption will permit Mosher Thomas Industries L.L.C.to ope rate an Unmanned Aircraft System.

Respectfully submitted,

J OHNSON & L INDBERG , P.A.

Submitted June 5 , 2015

s/ Michael C. Lindberg

Michael C. Lindberg Attorney for Mosher Thomas L.L.C.

780 Northland Plaza

3800 A merican Boulevard West Minneapolis, MN 55431

- 4459 (952) 851

- 0700 Direct: (952) 956

- 6200 mlindberg@johnsonlindberg.com