alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 113 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 113

   To modify the date as of which certain tribal land of the Lytton 
         Rancheria of California is deemed to be held in trust.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2005

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To modify the date as of which certain tribal land of the Lytton 
         Rancheria of California is deemed to be held in trust.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LYTTON RANCHERIA OF CALIFORNIA.

    Section 819 of the Omnibus Indian Advancement Act (114 Stat. 2919) 
is amended by striking the last sentence.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 160 (Tuesday, August 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21943]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. ER97-3858-000 and ER96-2921-004]


Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, L.L.C.; Notice of Filing

August 13, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 24, 1997, Duke Energy Trading and 
Marketing, L.L.C. (Duke Energy Trading) tendered for filing a 
Notification of a Change in Status, a Notice of Succession in 
accordance with 18 CFR 35.16 and 131.51), a revised Rate Schedule 
providing for sales at market-based rates of electric energy and 
capacity by Duke Energy Trading, and a revised Code of Conduct relating 
to Duke Energy Trading's activities as a marketer of electric energy 
and capacity at wholesale in interstate commerce. Duke Energy Trading 
states that these filings are intended to reflect the previously-
approved combination of the marketing affiliates of Duke Energy 
Corporation, including PanEnergy Trading and Market Services, L.L.C. 
(PanEnergy Trading), and the change in name of PanEnergy Trading to 
Duke Energy Trading.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filings should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before August 26, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21943 Filed 8-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 42905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21087]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 199

[DoD 6010.8-R]


Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services 
(CHAMPUS); Extension of the Active Duty Dependents Dental Plan to 
Overseas Areas; Correction

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Final rule; administrative corrections.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense published a final rule concerning 
the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services 
(CHAMPUS) on July 25, 1997 (62 FR 39940). This document corrects the 
administrative error for clarity.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 25, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. G. Zimmerman, telephone 703-695-3331
    Accordingly, the SUMMARY and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for the 
Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services 
(CHAMPUS); Extension of the Active Duty Dependents Dental Plan to 
Overseas Areas interim final rule is amended as follows:
    1. The SUMMARY is amended, last sentence, by revising ``active 
sponsors while overseas'' to read ``active duty sponsors overseas.''
    2. The SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section, second column, third 
paragraph, third sentence is amended by revising ``beneficiaries will 
be requested'' to read ``beneficiaries will be required''.

    Dated: August 5, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-21087 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
#### FIDELITY & CASUALTY OF NEW YORK v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO., et al.

No. 60421.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 27, 1977.

In re: Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 347 So.2d 1224.

Writ denied.
CENTURY ALUMINUM – HAWESVILLE, KENTUCKY

Potline 1‐4 Data

I. Potline 1‐4 Data

a. Summary of Operational Pots During Testing Events:  112 pots per potline

b. Production Capacities:  62,500 TPY capacity per line

c. Installation Dates: 1969 start‐up date and they have never been shutdown
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42975-42976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21075]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-434-000]


Transwestern Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

August 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 1, 1997, Transwestern Pipeline Company 
(Transwestern) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets 
proposed to become effective on September 1, 1997:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 1A
Original Sheet No. 5B.04
Original Sheet No. 37A
Original Sheet No. 37B
Original Sheet No. 37C
Original Sheet No. 37D
Original Sheet No. 37E
Original Sheet No. 37F
Original Sheet No. 156

    Transwestern states that the instant filing is made in accordance 
with Section 154.202 of the Commission's Regulations. Transwestern is 
proposing to offer a new interruptible Park 'N Ride Service under Rate 
Schedule PNR. Transwestern's Park 'N Ride Service will enable 
Transwestern to accommodate the needs of its customers in a manner not 
currently available under its existing tariff by providing shippers 
greater flexibility in managing their daily gas supply needs through 
the use of Transwestern's pipeline system.
    Transwestern states that copies of the filing were served upon 
Transwestern's customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such petitions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. All 
protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken in this proceeding, but will not serve 
to make Protestant a party to the proceeding. Any person wishing to

[[Page 42976]]

become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21075 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries III, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: January 26, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries III, Inc.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(A)



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
NCT Group, Inc. on Form S-1 (File Nos. 333-64967, 333-43387, 333-82359 and
333-87757) and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-11213) of our report, which includes an
explanatory paragraph about substantial doubt existing concerning the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern, dated February 25, 2000 (with respect
to Note 11, March 7, 2000), on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of the Company as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and for
the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 which report is included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



/s/ Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP

New York, New York
April 12, 2000

                                      112
#### JAMES & SON, INC., et al. v. J. G. BREEDLOVE et al.

SC 1868.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 3, 1977.

Rehearing Denied July 29, 1977.

Earl V. Johnson, Andalusia, for appellants.

W. H. Baldwin, Andalusia, for appellees.

FAULKNER, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order holding that a lessee was not entitled to recover from a lessor for damages caused by a roof collapse under a latent defect theory. We affirm.

On July 23, 1969, James & Son, Inc. (lessee) leased a commercial building from J. G. Breedlove and Joseph M. Breedlove (lessor) for five years. The lease contained no clause exempting lessor from liability for injury to lessee’s property due to defects in the premises but did place a duty on lessor to restore the premises if damaged by storm, fire or other casualty and a duty on lessee to keep the premises in good repair. Lessee sued lessor in the Circuit Court of Covington County, claiming $50,000 damages to lessee’s dry-goods business, resulting from the collapse of the roof on August 1, 1973. Lessee claimed that lessor knowingly falsely represented to lessee that the building was safe. Six weeks after the case was taken under advisement, lessee amended the complaint to claim that lessor had knowledge of latent defects not discoverable by lessee’s reasonable inspection and concealed from lessee. The trial court found for lessor, stating that the law is “that before a tenant can recover damages from a landlord resulting from latent defects in the premises, that the defects had to exist at the time of the letting of the premises and the landlord knew of them and concealed them from the tenant and that the law of negligence relative to duty to inspect does not apply.”

We opine that the trial court correctly stated the law as to recovery of damages resulting from latent defects. See *Chambers v. Buettner,*295 Ala. 8, 321 So.2d 650 (1975). Moreover, when the trial court hears evidence ore tenus, its conclusion is, like that of a jury, not to be disturbed unless plainly erroneous. *Ford v. Washington,*288 Ala. 194, 259 So.2d 226 (1972). There was sufficient evidence to support the order. We find no reversible error. *Frank v. Johnson,*261 Ala. 642, 75 So.2d 153 (1954).

AFFIRMED.

MADDOX, SHORES, EMBRY and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Winthrop
Growth Investors 1 Limited Partnership 1998 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000722565
<NAME> WINTHROP GROWTH INVESTORS 1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,863
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      710
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          44,801
<DEPRECIATION>                                (23,407)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         21,080
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,345
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,952
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,278
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,451
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (173)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.74)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0733

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

vs. 

CELEVE ERNEST SPANG,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 3, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 29 2024

05/29/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0733
~PPII’ CE BBS ’ 

## E ~TTOlWEY GENE= AUSTPN. 

## TIEXAS

xn Gpinian l?o.

a-35&5 thla dopertmellt held **that tlm**  hulder d (I oontnot oarrhr **pet** la sabjeot tb tiJmgeosuL ‘
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, George J. Bilek, certify that:
1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Juno Lighting, Inc., a Delaware corporation;
2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
   a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 
   b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered in this report based on such evaluation;
and
   c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect , the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 
5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);
   a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; 
and
   b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: February 25, 2004



/s/ GEORGE J. BILEK
George J. Bilek
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 42221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20665]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[WA61-7136, WA64-7139b; FRL-5869-9]

Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans: 
Washington

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approves in part several 
minor revisions to the state of Washington Implementation Plan (SIP). 
Pursuant to section 110 (a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Director of 
the Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE) submitted two requests to 
EPA dated November 25, 1996 and April 7, 1997 to revise certain 
regulations of a local air pollution control agency, namely, the Puget 
Sound Air Pollution Control Agency (PSAPCA). In the final rules Section 
of this Federal Register, the EPA is approving the State's SIP revision 
as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views 
this as a noncontroversial revision amendment and anticipates no 
adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in 
the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response 
to this proposed rule, no further activity is contemplated in relation 
to this rule. If the EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final 
rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be 
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. The 
EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received in writing by 
September 5, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to Montel Livingston, 
Environmental Protection Specialist (OAQ-107), Office of Air Quality, 
at the EPA Regional Office listed below. Copies of the documents 
relevant to this proposed rule are available for public inspection 
during normal business hours at the following locations. The interested 
persons wanting to examine these documents should make an appointment 
with the appropriate office at least 24 hours before the visiting day. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Office of Air Quality, 1200 
6th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101. The State of Washington Department of 
Ecology, P.O. Box 47600, Olympia, Washington 98504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Jacobsen, Office of Air Quality 
(OAQ-107), EPA, 1200 6th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101, (206) 553-6917.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the information provided in the Direct 
Final action which is located in the rules section of this Federal 
Register.

    Dated: July 17, 1997.
Chuck Findley,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-20665 Filed 8-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 158 (Friday, August 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21719]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33417]


Union Pacific Railroad Company--Trackage Rights Exemption--
Southern Pacific Transportation Company

    Southern Pacific Transportation Company (SP) has agreed to grant 
overhead trackage rights to Union Pacific Railroad Company over SP's 
east-west rail line known as the Fort Worth Branch extending from 
milepost 50.2, near Fort Worth, to milepost 0.0, near Garrett, and over 
SP's north-south rail line known as the Hearne Line extending between 
milepost 261.2, near Dallas at Belt Junction, to milepost 97.0, near 
Bryan, a total distance of 214.82 miles in the State of Texas.
    The transaction is scheduled to be consummated on or after the 
August 8, 1997 effective date of the exemption.
    The purpose of the trackage rights is to facilitate efficient train 
operations in a one-way directional movement of trains.
    As a condition to this exemption, any employees affected by the 
trackage rights will be protected by the conditions imposed in Norfolk 
and Western Ry. Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as 
modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.--Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 
653 (1980).
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If it contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed 
at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically 
stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33417 must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Joseph D. Anthofer, Esq., 1416 Dodge Street, #830, Omaha, NE 
68179.

    Decided: August 6, 1997.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21719 Filed 8-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P