alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Peter C. Brown,certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of AMC Entertainment Inc.;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)                Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)               Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

c)                Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a)                All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)               Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
|                          |   | /s/  PETER  C. BROWN        |
|--------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                     |   | Peter C. Brown                        |
|                     |   | Chairman of the Board,                |
| Date: June 18, 2007 |   | Chief Executive Officer and President |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                           1,272
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,288
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,057
<INVENTORY>                                     89,466
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               142,689
<PP&E>                                          82,586
<DEPRECIATION>                                  67,112
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 312,986
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,161
<BONDS>                                        112,598
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,318
<OTHER-SE>                                     122,879
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   312,986
<SALES>                                        614,502
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               614,502
<CGS>                                          515,980
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  515,980
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               141,948
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,898
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,798
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (43,426)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (18,236)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,190)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,190)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.26)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      99.1**





**FOR
      IMMEDIATE RELEASE**





For
      additional information contact:


Michael
      W. Shelton, Chief Financial Officer


Phone:
       336-369-0900











**FNB
      FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION**


**ANNOUNCES
      QUARTERLY DIVIDEND**








GREENSBORO,
      N.C.--(BUSINESS WIRE)—February 23, 2007--FNB Financial Services Corporation
      (NASDAQ: FNBF), parent
      of
      FNB Southeast, announced that the Board of Directors has approved a regular
      cash
      dividend of $0.13 per share for the first quarter of 2007. The dividend is
      payable March 30, 2007 to shareholders of record on March 16, 2007.




FNB
      Financial Services Corporation is a bank holding company with one subsidiary,
      FNB Southeast, a North Carolina chartered commercial bank. FNB Southeast
      currently operates 17 banking offices located in North Carolina and Virginia.
      FNB Southeast Mortgage Corporation and FNB Southeast Investment Services, Inc.
      are operating subsidiaries of FNB Southeast.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Noise  Cancellation  Technologies,  Inc.  on Form S-3  (File  Nos.  33-47611,
33-51468,  33-74442,  33-84694 and 333-10545),  on Form S-1 (File Nos. 33-19926,
33-38584  and  33-44790)  and on Form S-8 (File  Nos.  33-64792,  333-11209  and
333-11213) of our report,  which  includes an  explanatory  paragraph  about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern,  dated February 28, 1997 (with
respect to Note 15,  March 28, 1997,  Note 8, April 10, 1997,  and Note 7, April
18, 1997, respectively),  on our audits of the consolidated financial statements
and schedules of the Company as of December 31, 1996,  December 31, 1995 and for
the years ended December 31, 1996, December 31, 1995 and December 31, 1994 which
report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP

New York, New York
April 18, 1997

<PAGE>
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Alan L. Wells, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. May 12, 2005
    /s/  Alan L. WellsAlan L. WellsPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Spectrum Realty, Inc.;2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting;
 5)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions);
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  November 13, 2008
    By:
    /s/ William J. CardenWilliam J. CardenChief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1140 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1140

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the State Route 1 Bridge in the State of Delaware as the 
                ``Senator William V. Roth, Jr. Bridge''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF SENATOR WILLIAM V. ROTH, JR. BRIDGE.

    The State Route 1 Bridge over the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal in 
the State of Delaware is designated as the ``Senator William V. Roth, 
Jr. Bridge''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law (including regulations), map, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the bridge described in 
section 1 shall be considered to be a reference to the Senator William 
V. Roth, Jr. Bridge.

            Passed the Senate June 15, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1140

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the State Route 1 Bridge in the State of Delaware as the 
                ``Senator William V. Roth, Jr. Bridge''.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 986-987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-213]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-306-001]


Paiute Pipeline Company; Notice of Motion To Place Suspended 
Rates Into Effect

December 31, 1996.
    Take notice that on December 26, 1996, Paiute Pipeline Company 
(Paiute) filed a motion pursuant to Section 4(e) of the Natural Gas Act 
and Section 154.206(a) of the Commission's regulations to make 
effective on January 1, 1997, certain rates and a tariff sheet in 
connection with Paiute's request for general rate relief in Docket No. 
RP96-306-000. Specifically, Paiute has moved to place into effect on 
January 1, 1997, Fifth Revised Sheet No. 10 of Second Revised Volume 
No. 1-A of its FERC Gas Tariff.
    Paiute states that on July 1, 1996, Paiute filed certain revised 
tariff sheets in this proceeding, pursuant to Section 4 of the Natural 
Gas Act, to implement a proposed general rate increase. Paiute further 
states that by order issued July 31, 1996, the Commission accepted 
Paiute's proposed rates and suspended their effectiveness for five 
months to become effective January 1, 1997, subject to refund. Paiute 
states that in its suspension order, the Commission accepted the 
proposed rates subject to the condition that Paiute revise its rates to 
remove the costs of facilities not placed in service as of December 31, 
1996.
    With its motion, Paiute submitted Fifth Revised Sheet No. 10. 
Paiute indicates that Fifth Revised Sheet No. 10, in accordance with 
the Commission's suspension order, sets forth the rates proposed by 
Paiute in its July 1, 1996, filing in this proceeding, modified to 
reflect the exclusion of costs associated with facilities which will 
not be placed in service as of December 31, 1996. Paiute also states 
that Fifth Revised Sheet No. 10 incorporates the change in the annual 
charge adjustment surcharge rate which was approved by the Commission 
in Docket Nos. TM97-1-41-000 and TM97-1-41-001 by orders issued 
September 27 and November 6, 1996 respectively. Paiute moves that Fifth 
Revised Sheet No. 10 be made effective January 1, 1997.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

[[Page 987]]

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with 
Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. 
All such protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-213 Filed 1-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7878

ERNEST L. BYRD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

J. D. NETHERLAND; C. N. LEWIS; A. G. LEA,

Sargeant; DOROTHY CAMPBELL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-96-191-AM)

Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 22, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest L. Byrd, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ernest L. Byrd appeals the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Byrd v. Netherland, No. CA-96-191-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 23,

1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00348

- CR

Jacob KLEIN

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR2866

Honorable Pat Priest, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

MODIFIED to delete the assessment of attorney’s fees against appellant Jacob Klein. As

mod ified, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED.

SIGNED February 4, 2015.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

1

Richey Gentry

Official Court Reporter

81st District Court

265 PR 4661

Castroville, Texas 78009

October 21, 2015

INVOICE TO:

Mr. Sameer Mandke

Gilbert Mandke, PLLC

10100 Kleckley #15-B

Houston, Texas 77075 

In Re: Cause No. 14-08-00144-CVL, Mountain Laurel 

Minerals, LLC, Plaintiffs v. Mustang Minerals, LLC,. 

Defendants; Hearing held on September 2, 2015 in the 

81st District Court of Atascosa County, Texas.

Preparation of the Reporter's Record: $130.00

T H A N K Y O U

ACCEPTED

04-15-00617-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

10/23/2015 3:55:30 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK
#### S. H. Pomerance Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 7909.

Entry No. 720032, etc.

(Decided November 20, 1950)

*Murray Sprung*for the plaintiffs.

*.David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

UawrenCe, Judge:

It has been agreed between tbe parties hereto ithat the issues herein relating to the merchandise the subject of these ¡appeals are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Gothic Watch Co.,*23 Cust. Ct. 235, Reap. Dec. 7712, ¡affirming the judgment in *Gothic Watch Co.*v. *United States,*19 Cust. Ct. 309, Reap. Dec. 7438, and that the record in Reap. Dec. 7712, *.supra,*may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts, I find that the attempted appraisement ..embodied in the second return of value by the appraiser of the mer.chandise covered by each of the appeals for reappraisement enumer¡ated in the annexed schedule, which is marked *“A”*and made a part .of this decision, was illegal, null, and void, and that the appraiser’s .original return of value in each case, as reported by him to the collector -of customs, constituted his appraisal of the merchandise pursuant to ¡section 500 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1500), and was jinal and conclusive in the absence of any appeal pursuant to section .501 of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1501).

.Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 00-6853.

#### Machacek *v.*Hofbauer, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24


                        [RYDER SCOTT COMPANY LETTERHEAD]



                         CONSENT OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY


     We consent to the use on form 10-K of Sterling Drilling Fund 1983-2 of our
reserve report and all schedules, exhibits, and attachments thereto
incorporated by reference of Form 10-K and to any reference made to us on Form
10-K as a result of such incorporation.

                                         Very Truly Yours,

                                         /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                             PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

                                         RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                         PETROLEUM ENGINEERS



Denver, Colorado
March 11, 1997