alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 21, 2010 

Order 

 

September 21, 2010 

138602 (31) 

CATHERINE WILCOX, individually, and as 

Next Friend of ISAAC WILCOX, a minor, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

and 

SUNRISE HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC., 

 Intervening Plaintiff, 

 SC: 138602 

v COA: 290515 

Kent CC: 08-010129-NF 

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE 

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_______________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by defendant-appellee for extension of 

the time for filing its brief is considered, and it appearing the brief was filed September 

17, 2010, the time for filing is extended to that date.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

NORMAN GLAVAS and LUBA GLAVAS , Appellant s ,

v.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR CMALT REMIC SERIES 2007

- A6

- REMIC PASS

- THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2007

- A6 , Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 2349

[ January 25, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Susan R. Lubitz , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2015CA003022

.
Jonathan Kline of Jonathan Kline, P.A., Weston, for appellants.

David Rosenberg, Cynthia L. Comras and Jarrett Cooper of Robertson, Anschutz & Schneid, P.L., Boca Raton, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

W ARNER , M AY and D AMOORGIAN , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**PITTSBURGH AREA**

**2009 banked emission credits** **includes: *Allegheny, *Armstrong, Beaver, Butler, *Greene, *Lawrence, Washington and Westmoreland counties** *partial counties in the Pittsburgh area, here is a list of those municipalities... Allegheny

County: entire county

except: Liberty, Lincoln, Port Vue, and Glassport Boroughs and the City of Clairton Armstrong County : 3 municipalities: Elderton Borough, Plumcreek Twp, W ashington Twp Greene County: 1 municipality : Monongahela Township Lawrence County : 1 municipality : Taylor Township

**COUNTY COMPANY NAME**  **DEP PF ID**  **EPA FACILIT**  **Y ID PERMIT** 

**# VOC**  **TPY NOX**  **TPY SOX**  **TPY PM2.5**  **TPY PM10**  **TPY CO**  **TPY bank**  **(transfer) expire**  Allegheny PPG Industries - Springdale 171.82 1997 none Allegheny Kosmos Cement Company, Cemex 26.00 910.00 442.00 61.00 44.00 2002 2011 Allegheny Henry

Miller Spring & Manuf. Co. 36.47 10.96 2010 Allegheny Port Glenshaw Glass 10.64 59.46 74.89 23.11 25.40 2006 2014 Allegheny Sunoco Inc. (R&M) 25.16 2015 Allegheny Ashland Inc 41.78 10.73 461.00 2011 Allegheny Lindy

Paving Inc 9.10 6.85 0.66 1.77 5.71 18.78 2017 Allegheny Eastman Chemical Resins Inc 31.10 0.50 2.90 0.40 2014 Beaver Horsehead Corp. (Zinc Corp. of America) 3.30 382.50 3.20 9.40 1.40 2007 2012 Butler INDSPEC Chemical Corp 158.68 1217.95 2002 none Butler AK Steel Corp. 37.82 2006 2011-12 Washington World Kitchen 63-00110 251.43 2003 none Westmoreland Newcomer Products 16.00 2010

**TOTAL ERCs Banked** 368.07 1449.73 2118.00 30.98 101.51 525.58

8/24/09 updated with Aug 09 ERC listing
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Richard A. GREENWALD, Respondent.

No. 77-1509.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 13, 1977.

David Bludworth, State Atty., and Joel M. Weissman, Asst. State Atty., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Alan M. Medof of Duarte & Medof, P. A., Miami, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari is denied.

CROSS, ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43321]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21325]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EL94-81-005]


Georgia Power Company; Notice of Filing

August 7, 1997.
    Take notice on April 2, 1997, Georgia Power Company tendered for 
its refund report in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before August 18, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21325 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 00-772.

#### Carter *v.*Rodgers et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 40559.

#### Protests 819517-G, etc., of Academic Supply Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstiact 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on  Form 10-Q/A, Amendment No. 1 of Global Earth Energy, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending May 31, 2010, I, Sydney A. Harland, Chief Executive Officer of Global Earth Energy, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on  Form 10-Q/A, Amendment No. 1 for the fiscal quarter ending May 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on  Form 10-Q/A, Amendment No. 1 for the fiscal quarter ending May 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global Earth Energy, Inc.

Dated: July 30, 2010.

/s/ Sydney A. Harland

Sydney A. Harland, Chief Executive Officer of
    Global Earth Energy, Inc.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.33-50508) pertaining to the Maxicare Health Plans, Inc. 1990 Stock Option Plan, and the stockoption agreement with Peter J. Ratican dated December 5, 1990, the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-12803) pertaining to the Maxicare Health Plans,Inc. Outside Directors 1996 Formula Stock Option Plan, the Maxicare Health Plans, Inc. SeniorExecutives 1996 Stock Option Plan, the Maxicare Health Plans, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan, theRestricted Stock Grant Agreement by and between Maxicare Health Plans, Inc. and Peter J. Raticandated as of February 27, 1995, the Restricted Stock Grant Agreement by and between Maxicare HealthPlans, Inc. and Eugene L. Froelich dated as of February 27, 1995; the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-88005) pertaining to the Maxicare Health Plans,Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan; and the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement onForm S-3 (No. 333-48458) and the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on FormS-2 (No. 333-41510) of our report dated April 1, 2005 with respect to the 2004 consolidatedfinancial statements of Maxicare Health Plans, Inc. in its annual report on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2004.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Los Angeles, California
Mr. John Benkert 

MIT. Lincoln Lab 

244 Wood St. 

Lexington, MA 02420 

Dear John, 

November 22, 2015 

Suzanne and I are happy to allow MIT Lincoln Laboratory the use of our property at 1263 Green St. 

Gardner, MA. as a test site for Unmanned Aerial Sys. (UAS) starting in early 2016. 

Regards, OJ c=k--

41 ~ Andy Guertin
#### Patrick Michael AKERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-973.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 18, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 15, 1977.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Frank B. Kessler, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Basil S. Diamond, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of Murder in the Second Degree after having been charged with Murder in the First Degree. We find merit in one of Appellant’s assignments of error therefore need not discuss the others.

Under the guise of *Williams*Rule evidence, *Williams v. State,*110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959), the State was permitted to introduce items into evidence or testimony about certain items seized from the *victim’s*automobile shortly after his death. These items included drug paraphernalia, thirty-five pounds of marijuana, cocaine and a gun and holster. There was an assurance from the prosecutor that he would be able to or had established the relevance of these items to the trial. We have considered the record and cannot find the connection between the Defendant and these drugs, gun and paraphernalia found in the victim’s car nor can we find the promised evidence that the Appellant was in possession of the victim’s car. The prosecutor also alluded to a drug transaction between the Appellant and the victim thereby to show a motive; but no such transaction was ever proved. As was said in *Williams,*supra, and has been said over and over again, the State cannot introduce evidence of another crime unless some relevancy to the trial at hand is shown by the evidence. An additional problem here is that the drugs became rather a highlight in the trial and probably diverted the jury’s attention from the truly relevant evidence. See *Ashley v. State,*265 So.2d 685 (Fla. 1972); *Hirsch v. State,*279 So.2d 866 (Fla. 1973); *Green v. State,*228 So.2d 397 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969).

If prosecutors insist upon crying the wolf of the *Williams*Rule they might eventually find the courts hard of hearing.

*98REVERSED and REMANDED for a new trial.

CROSS and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21393]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,548 and TA-W-33,548A]


C.O.L.A., Jersey City, New Jersey and New York, New York; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on June 6, 1997, applicable to 
all workers of C.O.L.A. located in Jersey City, New Jersey. The notice 
was published in the Federal Register on June 27, 1997 (62 FR 34711).
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New information received 
by the company shows that worker separations occurred at the New York, 
New York location of C.O.L.A. when the entire company closed in May, 
1997. The New York, New York location was a showroom for piece good 
purchasing, sales and styling for the Jersey City, New Jersey location.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of C.O.L.A. who were adversely affected by increased imports of 
ladies' skirts, pants and shorts. Accordingly, the Department is 
amended the certification to cover the workers of C.O.L.A., New York, 
New York.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-33,548 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of C.O.L.A., Jersey City, New Jersey (TA-W-33,548), 
and New York, New York (TA-W-33,548A) who became totally or 
partially separated from employment on or after April 15, 1996 are 
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington D.C. this 30th day of July 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment.
[FR Doc. 97-21393 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20624]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #2970]


State of Idaho

    As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on June 
13, 1997 for Public Assistance only, and an amendment thereto on July 
22 adding Individual Assistance, I find that Bingham and Jefferson 
Counties in the State of Idaho constitute a disaster area due to 
damages caused by severe storms, snowmelt, land and mud slides, and 
flooding which occurred March 14 through July 3, 1997. Applications for 
loans for physical damages may be filed until the close of business on 
September 22, 1997, and for loans for economic injury until the close 
of business on April 22, 1998 at the address listed below or other 
locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, 
Disaster Area 4 Office, P.O. Box 13795, Sacramento, CA 95853-4795.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the following contiguous Idaho counties may be 
filed until the specified date at the above location: Bannock, Blaine, 
Bonneville, Butte, Caribou, Clark, Fremont, Madison, and Power.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:                                                    
  Homeowners with credit available elsewhere..................     7.625
  Homeowners without credit available elsewhere...............     3.875
  Businesses with credit available elsewhere..................     8.000
  Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit                
   available elsewhere........................................     4.000
  Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit               
   available elsewhere........................................     7.250
For Economic Injury:                                                    
  Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without                
   credit available elsewhere.................................     4.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 297006 
and for economic injury the number is 955700.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: July 25, 1997.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-20624 Filed 8-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 20-9006

IN RE: JOSÉ ANTONIO LÓPEZ CANCEL; CARMEN NEREIDA MEDINA 

GONZÁLEZ,

Debtors.

WILFREDO SEGARRA MIRANDA, Chapter 7 Trustee for José Antonio 

López Cancel and Carmen Nereida Medina González,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO, 

Defendant, Appellee, 

JOSÉ ANTONIO LÓPEZ CANCEL; CARMEN NEREIDA MEDINA GONZÁLEZ,

Intervenors, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court, issued on August 6, 2021, is 

amended as follows: 

On page 12, line 21, please replace "Id." with "id."
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement(Nos. 333-128310, 333-114810 and 333-90338) on Form S-3 and the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-143420 and 333-53224) on Form S-8 of Immunomedics, Inc. (“Immunomedics”) of our reports dated August 27, 2009 with respect to theconsolidated financial statements and schedules of Immunomedics and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Immunomedics, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2009. 

**/s/ Ernst & Young LLP**

MetroPark, New Jersey 

August 27, 2009
Exhibit 21.1
 TERRA INDUSTRIES INC.
MAJORITY AND PARTIALLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES
February 25, 2010
 PercentageName of Company
    
    Jurisdiction
    
    Held by TerraBeaumont Ammonia Inc.
    
    DelawareBeaumont Holdings Corporation
    
    DelawareBMC Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareGrowHow U.K. Limited
    
    England
    
    501Houston Ammonia Terminal, L.P.
    
    Delaware
    
    502Inspiration Coal Inc.
    
    DelawareInspiration Consolidated Copper Company
    
    MaineInspiration Development Company
    
    DelawareInspiration Gold Incorporated
    
    DelawareOklahoma CO2 Partnership
    
    Oklahoma
    
    503Point Lisas Nitrogen Limited
    
    Trinidad and Tobago
    
    504Port Neal Corporation
    
    DelawareTerra (Barbados) SRL
    
    BarbadosTerra (U.K.) Holdings Inc.
    
    DelawareTerra Capital, Inc.
    
    DelawareTerra Capital Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareTerra Environmental Technologies Inc.
    
    DelawareTerra Express, Inc.
    
    DelawareTerra Global Holding Company Inc.
    
    DelawareTerra Houston Ammonia, Inc.
    
    DelawareTerra Industries Inc.
    
    MarylandTerra Industries International Holdings Luxembourg S.à r.l.
    
    LuxembourgTerra Industries Luxembourg S.à r.l.
    
    LuxembourgTerra International, Inc.
    
    DelawareTerra International (Canada) Inc.
    
    Ontario, CanadaTerra International (Oklahoma) Inc.
    
    DelawareTerra Investment Fund I LLC
    
    OklahomaTerra Investment Fund II LLC
    
    OklahomaTerra LP Holdings LLC
    
    DelawareTerra Methanol Corporation
    
    DelawareTerra Mississippi Holdings Corp.
    
    Mississippi
 
 1
    
    Kemira GrowHow U.K. Limited owns the other 50% of
GrowHow U.K. Limited.2
    
    PCS owns the other 50% of Houston Ammonia Terminal, L.P.3
    
    Praxair Inc. owns the other 50% of Oklahoma
Co2 Partnership.4
    
    KNC Trinidad Limited owns the other 50% of Point Lisas
Nitrogen Limited. Page 1




---



##### 



Exhibit 21.1
 TERRA INDUSTRIES INC.
MAJORITY AND PARTIALLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES
February 25, 2010
 PercentageName of Company
    
    Jurisdiction
    
    Held by TerraTerra Mississippi Nitrogen, Inc.
    
    DelawareTerra Nitrogen, Limited Partnership
    
    DelawareTerra Nitrogen Company, L.P.
    
    DelawareTerra Nitrogen Corporation
    
    DelawareTerra Nitrogen GP Holdings Inc.
    
    DelawareTerra Nitrogen GP Inc.
    
    DelawareTerra Nitrogen Trinidad Limited
    
    Trinidad and TobagoTerra Partners (Canada) LP
    
    Alberta, CanadaTerra Real Estate Corporation
    
    IowaTerra Real Estate Development Corporation
    
    IowaTerra Tank Lines Inc.
    
    DelawareTerra V.I. Holdings, Inc.
    
    British Virgin Islands
 Page 2
Share
      Transfer Agreement

     

    


    Transferor:
      Zhao Yao (hereinafter Party A)

    Transferee:
      Shanxi Putai Resources Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter Party B)

    


    WHEREAS,
      Party A and Party B have been discussing certain arrangements

    under
      which Party A will transfer its stock ownership in Shanxi Puda Coal Group Co.
      Ltd (“Shanxi Coal”) to Party B, the parties hereto agree as follows:


    


    	1.  	
            Now
              Party A agrees to transfer 18% among its total 20% stock ownership
              in
              Shanxi Coal to Party B at a purchase price of RMB 4,050,000. Party
              B will
              pay the purchase price within three months of the execution of this
              agreement. The closing of the transfer will occur on the date a government
              approval or confirmation with respect to the transfer is received.
              

          


     

    	2.  	
            This
              agreement is
              in
              triplicate. Each party
              has one copy, and one copy shall be recorded at the Bureau of Industrial
              and Commercial Administration.

          


     

    	3.  	
            This
              agreement becomes effective once both parties have signed
              it.

          


     

    


     

    


    Party
      A:
      Zhao Yao

    Date:
      September 13th,
      2007

    


    Party
      B:
      Shanxi Putai Resources Group Co., Ltd.

    Date:
      September 13th,
      2007
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 133 

To amend section 302 of the PROTECT Act to modify the standards for 

the issuance of alerts through the AMBER Alert communications network. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2005 

Mr. TALENT (for himself and Mr. FEINGOLD) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 302 of the PROTECT Act to modify 

the standards for the issuance of alerts through the 

AMBER Alert communications network. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tory Jo’s AMBER 

5 Response Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR ISSUANCE AND DIS7 SEMINATION OF ALERTS THROUGH AMBER 

8 ALERT COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK. 

9 Section 302(b) of the PROTECT Act (42 U.S.C. 

10 5791a(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 
2 

•S 133 IS

1 ‘‘(5) The minimum standards shall, to the max2 imum extent practicable (as determined by the Coor3 dinator in consultation with State and local law en4 forcement agencies), allow local law enforcement of5 ficials to issue, and to provide for the dissemination 

6 of, an alert through the AMBER Alert communica7 tions network to facilitate the recovery of an ab8 ducted newborn.’’. 

9 SEC. 3. DEFINITION. 

10 Title III of the PROTECT Act (42 U.S.C. 5791 et 

11 seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘SEC. 306. DEFINITION. 

13 ‘‘For purposes of this title, the term ‘child’ means— 

14 ‘‘(1) an individual under 18 years of age; or 

15 ‘‘(2) a newborn.’’. 

Æ