alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Michael Pehl,  Chief Executive Officer of Immunomedics, Inc., certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed the first amendment to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Immunomedics, Inc.; and

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this amendment does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this amendment.

 

 
| Date: August 24, 2018 |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
|                       |   |
|                       |   |
| */s/ Michael Pehl*         |   |
| Michael Pehl               |   |
| Chief Executive Officer    |   |

 

----
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

Certification of Treasurer



I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Big Sky Industries III, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: January 26, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2302 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain ski boots, cross 

country ski footwear, and snowboard boots. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. LEAHY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain ski 

boots, cross country ski footwear, and snowboard boots. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SKI BOOTS, CROSS COUNTRY SKI 

4 FOOTWEAR, AND SNOWBOARD BOOTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.64.04 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 certain ski boots, cross country ski footwear, and 

8 snowboard boots) is amended by striking the date in the 

9 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2302 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EPA Public Webinar on Potential Reinterpretation of Clean Water Act TAS

September 10 , 2015 2:00

– 4:00 p.m. EDT

Webinar Summary

Presenters: Tom Gardner , EPA Office of Science and Technology

Tod Siegal, EPA Office of General Counsel

Moderator: Tom Gardner , EPA Office of Science and Technology

Participants: See last page

– about 3 0 p articipants attended

P RESENTATION S UMMARY

The webinar began with introductions and instructions for participants, followed by a

presentation by Mr. Gardner and Mr. Siegal based on briefing slides available in the docket for

the rulemaking at www.regulations.gov . Search for Docket ID No. EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 2014

- 0461

.

The webinar continued with an opportunity for questions and comments from participants.

Questions were submitted by participants either in writing through the chat window to the EPA

moderator, Mr. Gardner , or over the phone after the phone lines were o pened.

The following is a list of questions received from participants during the webinar. For each of the

questions, the EPA presenters provided responses that were consistent with the presentation

materials and other information available at http://www.epa.gov/wqs

- tech/revised

- interpretation

clean

- water

- act

- tribal

- provision . V iews and comments provided were acknowledged.

Q UESTIONS

 Would this al so apply to the TAS for Clean Air Act for Tribes?

 Will comments from participants in this webinar be included?

 How and what would a tribe need to do to apply for TAS under this new interpretation?

 What if our Tribe has already submitted TAS application and went through Public

C omment Period and we are just awaiting approval from Region 9?

 Would the delegation of CWA authority to set WQS extend to other lands over which the

Federal Government has retained legislative jurisdiction, so that the Federal Governm ent

and not the adjoining State would set the WQS?W EBINAR A TTENDEES

First Name Last Name Affiliation

Lori Blair The Boeing Company

Peter Brumm

Lorraine Cope USCG (CTR

- E3 )

Steve Covell USDA

Crystal Davis Sac and Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa

Thomas Dosch Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

Sara Drescher Forest County Potawatomi Community

Ronnie Hawks Jennings, Haug & Cunningham

Jason Hempsmyer Mechoopda Indian Tribe

Lisa Hopinkah San Felipe Pueblo

Gene Ka

- hee Pueblo de Cochiti DNRC Department

Gina Leverette Salt River Pima

- Maricopa Indian Community

Aaron Loomis

Jeffrey Lynch Cortina Indian Rancheria

Rebecca McMahon Yurok Tribe

Kimberly Miller Morongo Band of Mission Indians

Steven Moore Native American Rights Fund

Meghann Niesen Office of Science and Technology

Kate Pinkerton

Jane Ratcliff

Crystal Robinson

Suzanne Schaeffer Dentons US LLP

Jane Steadman Kanji & Katzen PLLC

Mike Stover Region 1

Candon Tanaka Shoshone

- Bannock Tribes

Doug Thompson Law Office of Douglas P. Thompson, PLLC

Mark Valencia San Manuel Band of Mission Indians

Heather Westra Prairie Island Indian Community

Jennifer Williams Institute for Tribal Environmental Professionals

Joy Yoshioka Iowa T ribe of Oklahoma
# • Federal Aviation

Administration

S

mall UAS Ce r tif i ca te o f Re g i st r at i o n

C E RT I F IC-A T

E HO L D E R: Dav i d Hotden



## UA S C ERTif iCA TE NUMB E R: F A3YTCNY4W

IS S

U E

D: 12/30 / 2015 E X P

IR E S: 12/29 / 2018 F <>t U.S.**Cii:<:'M $,.** **JX'(~IN' I**  fi!StdM U

, ;,(ld**(.:.1~11011** Cl:i:l:'/1 U. S

.**C~~ IIM$,** **~** doc..-l! r C<IM t .'tli/Ci .1**C~J.'Ic~~oi «!,·** **~'lct'l.** 

### F<K i1<1!**6rll~4** !IIU

dtXwr<M r**t~ll:1«** .1 A:'eog.')irloll of**OIW'It:~r~I\'Qo**

F<>t ;,.'( 1'1Ckf«s,**{~** 

### .lll 6t!<!I.UfCfl$ 

### C..'tl« :ll.1of**~** ;t t'I'I<Xk( :1>'f"¥l uf'ldtJ $ K SJ 6 Ol

Pvb

. 

### L 

### JJ2 95,**.1ddl :~1** **$.1!~y** JNI I IIO'l:y 

### lt<>m FAA Xld c.:t:momk ;,

.. •:horlry

!fcm OOT 

### m.1y Del :11/J!.IIf.:d

.

S .lfctyovid di<'l es roo**f\ ~t'I** **Q)'Ou•** ull l'l'l il o l<'l td**.l r(l~l\:** 



### l= ly 

### t.eo 'Qn 40 0**~** 

### N

e v

er 

## 1\y 

## n oe, r cM t r**tcr ~**  

### K ee-

p ywr UASw:<:k :n**i:~** 

### m e o f**91'1t** 

## K ee

p**\'ot~yfrom ney** **~oond er** **-;; e-** **.t 1y** **.r um** **. ~** 



## everr,.; or g ('OI.Iy.oi**e oe\** **!** 

## 1 y**6-...r** 

## th e**nilue n:~**  

## oi

clrus<;;« e !c o hot**"-' -e-** **"ly** 

### within '**..e of**  

### M e 1 rpott**with 01nf** **nt if** **~ ciM':rol~~** **r:. uth** **011'li ~**
O pinion filed September 27 , 201 8



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

____ _ ______


### No. 11

- 1 8

- 00 2 23

- C R

_____ __ ____


### BRIAN HARRISON SIMS , Appellan t

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 3 5th District Court
Brown County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No

. CR25839

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Brian Harrison Sims

, Appellant, has filed a motion to dismiss h is appeal . In
the motion, Appellant indicates that he no longer wishes to prosecute an appeal in

this cause

. Attached to the motion is a document in which Appellant explains why

he n o longer wishes to pursue th is appeal. The motion is si gned by Appellant ’s

counsel, and the document attached to the motion is signed by Appellant and his

counsel . Consequently, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 4 2.2

.2 The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

September 27 , 2018
Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Willson, J., and Wright, S. C.J. 1

Willson, J., not participating

.

1 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment.
null

2009-06-10

156.40228

eng - Argued: 2009-06-10. Docket number: 08-3650-08-3651
**Exhibit
        No. 32.1**


Certification
      Pursuant to


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


(as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906


of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
      connection with the amended quarterly report Royal Spring Water Inc. (the
“Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended February 28, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each
      of the undersigned of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that, to the best of their knowledge:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written certification has been provided to the Company and
      will
      be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
                  Alex HazanName:
                  Alex HazanTitle:
                  Chief Executive OfficerAugust
                  16, 2007/s/
                  Harel GoldsteinName:
                  Harel GoldsteinTitle:
                  Chief Financial OfficerAugust
                  16, 2007




This
        Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This exhibit is not “filed” for purposes of Section
        18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as provided
        by applicable rules of the Securities Exchange
        Commission.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 158 (Friday, August 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43772-43773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21720]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33440]


Arkansas-Oklahoma Railroad Company--Trackage Rights Exemption--
Union Pacific Railroad Company

    Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) will agree to lease trackage to 
Arkansas-Oklahoma Railroad Company (AOK)

[[Page 43773]]

over: (1) UP's Krebs Industrial Lead extending from the clearance point 
of the mainline switch at milepost 564.5 to the end of the Krebs 
Industrial Lead, and (2) UP's Shawnee Branch extending from milepost 
364.96 to milepost 370.5.
    The transaction is scheduled to be consummated on or after August 
7, 1997.
    The purpose of the trackage rights is to provide AOK railroad 
freight service on the Shawnee Branch at McAlester, OK, and the Krebs 
Industrial spur between McAlester, and Krebs, OK.
    As a condition to this exemption, any employees affected by the 
trackage rights will be protected by the conditions imposed in Norfolk 
and Western Ry. Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as 
modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.--Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 
653 (1980).
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If it contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed 
at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically 
stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33440 must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Kelley E. O'Brien, Esq., Mayer, Brown & Platt, 2000 
Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20006-1881.

    Decided: August 6, 1997.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21720 Filed 8-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
EX-10.1



 





Exhibit 10.1



AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     This AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered
into on this 9th day of November, 2007 by and between CINCINNATI BELL INC., an Ohio
corporation (“Employer”) and RODNEY D. DIR, an Ohio resident (“Employee”).



RECITALS





	 	A.	 	Employer and Employee entered into that certain Employment Agreement (the
“Employment Agreement”) on July 26, 2005.
	 
	 	B.	 	Employer and Employee desire to amend and clarify certain terms of the
Employment Agreement as set forth in this Amendment; more particularly, Employee’s
agreement to extend the time period during which certain restrictive covenants shall
remain effective, and Employer’s agreement to waive Employee’s obligation under
Section 13.F of the Employment Agreement to provide Employer 60 days’ prior written
notice of his resignation.





AGREEMENT




     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the undersigned hereby
agree as follows:




	1.	 	Amendments to Employment Agreement. The Employment Agreement is hereby amended as
follows:






	 	A.	 	The following sentence shall be added to the end of Section 13.F:
	 
	 	 	 	Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, any Target Bonus earned
(prorated through October 31, 2007) but not paid as of October 31, 2007 shall be
payable to Employee at the same time that Employer customarily pays annual bonuses;
provided, however, that Employer shall pay such Bonus to Employee no later than
March 31, 2008.
	 
	 	B.	 	All references in Section 11 to “one-year” and “one year” are deleted in
their entirety and replaced with “two-year” and “two years” respectively.






	2.	 	Amendment and Ratification. The parties agree that the Employment Agreement is
hereby amended in accordance with the foregoing provisions of this Amendment. Except as
specifically amended herein, all remaining provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain
in full force and effect as written.




1









 












	3.	 	Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have the same meanings
as in the Employment Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.






	4.	 	Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute but one and the
same instrument.





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first
above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	EMPLOYER:



Cincinnati Bell Inc.,

an Ohio corporation

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ John F. Cassidy
 	 
	 	Name:  	John F. Cassidy 	 	 
	 	Title:  	Chief Executive Officer 	 	 
	 
	 	EMPLOYEE:

 	 
	 	/s/ Rodney D. Dir
 	 
	 	Rodney D. Dir, individually 	 
	 	 	 
	 




2
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# ‘Two Continents, One Mission:’ May/June Loglines available  

DLA Public Affairs

                FORT BELVOIR, Virginia  –              Defense Logistics Agency Europe & Africa                              - The expansion of support to U.S. forces in Eastern Europe, including a look at how DLA Energy is supporting operations there.
                              - DLA Installation Support efforts to improve facilities in Europe and Africa. 
                              - A look at how operational contract support enables DLA and its customers to streamline contracts and avoid duplication.
                              - DLA Disposition Services efforts to provide supplies for refugees in Europe.
                              - A wrap-up of DLA’s support to Operation United Assistance, the DoD portion of the U.S. Agency for International Development-led effort to stop Ebola as it spread through West Africa.
loglines@dla.mil

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Warfighter FirstLoglines
Petition for Writ of Mandamus D ismisse d , Petition for Writ of Prohibition

Dismissed, and Memorandum Opinion filed May 25 , 2021

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00230

- CR
NO. 14

- 21

- 00231

- CR

IN RE MARCUS TYRONE GRANT , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS WRIT OF PROHIBITION 506th Judicial District Court Waller County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20

- 12

- 17503



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
May 4, 2021 , relator Marcus Tyrone Grant filed a petition for writ of

m andamus and a petition for writ of prohibition in this court

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.2 P ETITION FOR W RIT OF M ANDAMUS In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Gary W. Chaney , presiding judge of the 506th Judicial District Court of Waller County , to reinstate his bond. Relator is seeking habeas

- corpus relief. The courts of appeal s have no original habeas

- corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters. In re Ayers , 51 5 S.W.3d 356, 356 (Tex. App.―Houston [14 th Dist.] 2016, orig. proceeding) (citing Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(d)). Original jurisdiction to grant an application for a writ of habeas corpus in a criminal case is vested in the Texas Court of Criminal Appe als, the district courts, the county courts, or a judge in those courts. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art 11.05. Therefore, this court does not have original habeas

- corpus jurisdiction to grant relator’s requested relief.

P ETITION FOR W RIT OF P ROHIBITION Relator also filed a petition for writ of prohibition to prevent Judge Chaney from committing relator to a mental hospital. A writ of prohibition is “a creature of limited purpose” that is appropriate only after an appellate court’s jurisdiction has been invoked on independent grounds and then only in aid of that jurisdiction. In re Munk , 448 S.W.3d 687 , 694 (Tex. App.

— Eastland 2014, orig. proceeding)

. Appellate courts do not have general power to issue writs of prohibition. In re Yates , 193 S.W.3d 151, 152 (Tex. App.―Houston [1s t Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding)

. Thus, i n the absence of actual jurisdiction of a related appeal , a n appellate court does

no t have jurisdiction to issue a writ of prohibition requiring that a trial court refrain from performing a future act. Munk , 448 S.W.3d at 694; Yates , 193 S.W.3d at 152

. Relator does not have a related appeal pending in this court. Therefore, we do not h ave jurisdiction to issue a writ of prohibition.3 C ONCLUSION

R elator’s petition for writ of mandamus and petition for writ of prohibition are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Hassan. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).