alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6813

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

AARON BROCKINGTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CR-90-100, CA-96-5-3)

Submitted: September 24, 1996 Decided: October 9, 1996

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron Brockington, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Elizabeth Evans, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Aaron Brockington appeals from the district court's order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.

104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Brockington, Nos. CR-90-100; CA-96-5-3 (E.D. Va. April 10, 1996,

May 9, 1996). We deny Brockington's motion for appointment of

counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EPA Hearing on Heav y Duty Truck Fuel Efficiency

Standards Thursday , August 6, 9 a.m. The Palmer House Hilton Hotel 17 East Monroe Street Chicago, IL. 60603 Jim Arneberg
Any one stuck in traffic has driven behind one of those rolling smudge pots we call diesel trucks. Every one has seen the black, carcinogenic bile that these vehicles belch into our air. Each of us has smelled the noisome stench. A ride through an y hazy urban

core is testimony to how diesel fuel particulate matter pervades our atmosphere. Yet, because of oil compan y and engine manufacturing lobbyists, this sickening expulsion of malignant and killing toxins is lightly regulated

. According to the North Texas C ouncil of Governments ’ 2008 report, Health Concerns Associated with Excessive Idling , diesel exhaust accounts for one quarter of the pollution in the air. Kimberly K. Smith of the Alternative Energy I nstitute in her book, Powering Our Future: An Energy Sou rcebook for Sustainable Living , states that studies from air qualit y monitors indicate that each year 125,000 cases of cancer and 50,000 premature deaths occur in the United States as a result of exposure to diesel exhaust. That’s 50,000 deaths a year, a number that can be corroborated by a number of studies by the Natural Resources Defense Council, the American Cancer Societ y, and Harvard University . Fift y thousand are more deaths per y ear than the traffic fatalities in the United States. Fifty

thousand ar e more deaths than battlefield mortalities during the 10

- ye ar Vietnam War. Fift y thousand annual deaths rivals the carnage of World War II. Why aren’t we regulating diesel fuel exhaust fumes?And cancer is not the lone worry . It’s no secret that benzene in diesel exhaust

causes blood disorders. Lead, cadmium, and mercury cause birth defects and mental deficiency . Dioxins are highl y toxic and can cause reproductive and developmental problems, damage the immune sy stem, interfere with hormones, and also cause cancer. Other people here today

will argue that allowing diesel exhaust to spew unabated will protect jobs, but who protects the lives of those 50,000 dead each ye ar? Who protects those 125,000 cases of cancer from the horrors of chemotherap y? The savings of deregulating diesel fuel aren’t passed on to the consumer or to the truck drivers and mechanics who breathe these deadl y fumes. The savings of deregulation goes into the pockets of oil compan y board members. In 2014, Exon

- Mobile distributed $23.6 billio n to shareholders. How much of that $23.6 billion did the truck drivers and mechanics see? Please regulate diesel oil rigidl y so that Americans can breath more easily

.
**JUL**
               Jan
				**FEB**17**2007**
               2009
				**2010****34 captures**
           21 Apr 05 - 16 Oct 12
   Close
       Help


Leopold Wetland Management District
 Midwest Region
 County & Waterfowl Production Area 
(WPA) Maps **Click the name at the left or the county 
      located on the map below**
  AdamsColumbiaDaneDodgeFond du LacJeffersonManitowocMarquetteOcontoOutagamieOzaukeeRockShawanoSheboyganWausharaWinnebagoDirections
 
 Leopold WMD Home  Midwest Region Home
 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Home Page Department of the Interior USA.gov About the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Accessibility Privacy Notices Disclaimer FOIA
 Find Office By ProgramAdministrationEcological ServicesExternal AffairsFisheriesLaw EnforcementMigratory BirdsRefugesState Programs
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA to hold Restoration Advisory Board meeting April 11 in Chesterfield

By DLA Aviation Public Affairs Office

                RICHMOND, Va.   –              
Defense Logistics Agency officials from Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, will host a Restoration Advisory Board meeting at 7:30 p.m., April 11, 2016 at the Bensley Community Center located at 2900 Drewry's Bluff Rd., North Chesterfield, Virginia 23237. The meeting is open to the public.   

As part of ongoing evaluation and cleanup, DLA has established a citizen advisory committee called a Restoration Advisory Board (RAB).  The RAB comprises members from the community, DLA, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. 

The meeting will cover the DLA Installation Support at Richmond, Environmental Office's ongoing groundwater testing results and remediation activities for operable units on center.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

RABRestoration Advisory Board
Exhibit 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 2-93013, 33-23918, 33-72270 and 33-58703) of S & K
Famous Brands, Inc. of our report dated March 10, 1997,  appearing on page 15 of
the 1996 Annual  Report to  Shareholders  which is  incorporated  in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

PRICE WATERHOUSE  LLP

Norfolk, Virginia
April 11, 1997
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MFIC Corporation. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |  | By: | /s/DENNIS P. RIORDANDennis P. Riordan Corporate
Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
| |  | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
Order entered November 7, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 01380 - CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V. KIMBERLY PINKERTON, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court of Appeals No. 1

Dallas County, Texa s Trial Court Cause No. MC - 12 - R0027 - D



### O RDER The State’s October 27, 2014 motion to extend the time to file its notice of appeal is GRANTED . The State’s notice of appeal filed with the Clerk of this Court on October 27, 2014 is DEEMED timely filed for ju risdictional purposes on October 27, 2014. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to transmit a copy of the notice of appeal to the trial court clerk. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(c)(1).

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1346

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study

of maritime sites in the State of Michigan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Michigan Lighthouse

5 and Maritime Heritage Act’’.
 †

2

S 1346 ES

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

2 In this Act:

3 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means

4 the Secretary of the Interior.

5 (2) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the State

6 of Michigan.

7 SEC. 3. STUDY.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, in consultation

9 with the State, the State Historic Preservation Officer,

10 and other appropriate State and local public agencies and

11 private organizations, shall conduct a special resource

12 study of resources related to the maritime heritage of the

13 State.

14 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the study is to

15 determine—

16 (1) suitable and feasible options for the long17 term protection of significant maritime heritage re18 sources in the State; and

19 (2) the manner in which the public can best

20 learn about and experience the resources.

21 (c) REQUIREMENTS.—In conducting the study under

22 subsection (a), the Secretary shall—

23 (1) review Federal, State, and local maritime

24 resource inventories and studies to establish the po25 tential for interpretation and preservation of mari26 time heritage resources in the State;
†

3

S 1346 ES

1 (2) recommend management alternatives that

2 would be most effective for long-term resource pro3 tection and providing for public enjoyment of mari4 time heritage resources;

5 (3) address how to assist regional, State, and

6 local partners in increasing public awareness of and

7 access to maritime heritage resources;

8 (4) identify sources of financial and technical

9 assistance available to communities for the preserva10 tion and interpretation of maritime heritage re11 sources; and

12 (5) identify opportunities for the National Park

13 Service and the State to coordinate the activities of

14 appropriate units of national, State, and local parks

15 and historic sites in furthering the preservation and

16 interpretation of maritime heritage resources.

17 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date

18 on which funds are made available to carry out the study

19 under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the

20 Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Sen21 ate and the Committee on Resources of the House of Rep22 resentatives a report that describes—

23 (1) the results of the study; and

24 (2) any findings and recommendations of the

25 Secretary.
†

4

S 1346 ES

1 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

2 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums

3 as are necessary to carry out this Act.

Passed the Senate September 29, 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1346

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct

a study of maritime sites in the State of Michigan.
**-  Southern Plains  
-  Las Cruces, NM 
-  Range Management Research 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search  UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">		You are here: 						Research / 																				**Research Project:**Field Testing of Monitoring and Assessment Technologies Across Large Ranch Landscapes in the Southwestern U.S.
**Location: Range Management Research**
**2007 Annual Report**
**1a.Objectives (from AD-416)**													The objective of this cooperative research project is to develop technologies for integrative assessment and monitoring of ecologically important rangeland properties at multiple scales, and develop ecological approaches for describing landscapes.						
**1b.Approach  (from AD-416)**													Collaborative experiments will be designed and implemented at jointly identified sites in the southwestern United States within the Malpai Borderlands Region.  Experiments will be patterned after existing experiments to.1)design methods for describing ecological sites in a globally consistent manner that can be applied specifically to the Malpai Borderlands region, and.2)design assessment and monitoring technologies appropriate for both ground-based and remotely sensed indicators of ecosystem properties that are linked to those ecological site descriptions.						
**3.Progress Report**													This report documents research conducted under a specific cooperative agreement between ARS and the Malpai Borderlands Group (MBG), a non profit organization of ranching families formed to conserve the resources of this 800,000-acre region of southwestern New Mexico and southeastern Arizona.  This research address objectives of the research unit as described by the parent CRIS, 6235-11210-005-00D, Technologies for Management of Arid Rangelands.  In particular, this agreement addresses unit emphasis on monitoring technologies for rangelands.  This project will evaluate new field-based methodology for rapidly describing ecological sites and relating those descriptions to assessment and monitoring of rangelands. The project objectives have been addressed by two meetings during 2007, and the participation of a lead rancher with MBG in the annual symposium of the ARS at the Jornada.  The MBG and the ARS unit had frequent email and telephone communication and discussions addressing monitoring activities.						
    Project TeamHavstad, Kris Bestelmeyer, Brandon  
Project Annual Reports FY 2009 FY 2008 FY 2007 
Related National Programs Rangeland, Pasture, and Forages(215)  							Last Modified: 05/10/2010 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7693.

Invoice dated London, England, May 6, 1946.

Certified May 6, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 27, 1946.

Entry No. 763698.

(Decided April 5, 1949)

*John B. Rafter*for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge;

(Abstract) This appeal for reappraisement concerns the so-called British Purchase Tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

Undisputed facts establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise is export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), and that such statutory values for the articles in question are the entered values, less the additions made by the importer on entry- because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# McNamara HQC Family Day provides music, movies, memories 

By Amanda NeumannDLA Public Affairs

                Fort Belvoir, VA  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

MoraleWelfareRecreationFamily Day
No. 48282.

#### Protests 36709-K, etc., of F. B. Wilcon (Boston).

*458Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The uncontradicted evidence disclosed that the instant importation is similar in all material respects to the motorboats the subject of *Barber*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 340, C. D. 492), the record in which case was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith the protests were sustained as to this claim.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43185-43186]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21249]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated March 31, 1997, and published in the Federal 
Register on May 8, 1997, (62 FR 25210), Lonza Riverside, 900 River 
Road, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428, made application by renewal to 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed 
below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule         
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amphetamine (1100).........................  II                         
Phenylacetone (8501).......................  II                         
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    DEA has considered the factors in Title 21, United States Code, 
section 823(a), as well as information provided by other bulk 
manufacturers, and

[[Page 43186]]

determined that the registration of Lonza Riverside to manufacture the 
listed controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at 
this time. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR 0.100 and 
0.104, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
hereby orders that the application submitted by the above firm for 
registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled 
substances listed above is granted.

    Dated: July 28, 1997.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-21249 Filed 8-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M