alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-10517

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

JOZADAQUE RODRIGUES DA SILVA, 

SIMONE LOPES RODRIGUES DA SILVA, 

JULIA RHAYALLA LOPES RODRIGUES DA SILVA, 

RHARYSSON PABLO LOPES RODRIGUES DA SILVA, 

Petitioners,

versus

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, 

Respondent.

____________________

USCA11 Case: 24-10517 Document: 8-1 Date Filed: 05/16/2024 Page: 1 of 3
2 Opinion of the Court 24-10517

Petition for Review of a Decision of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Agency No. A098-713-850

____________________

Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Petitioners Jozadaque Rodrigues Da Silva and Simone Lopes 

Rodrigues Da Silva, proceeding pro se and on behalf of their minor 

children, seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ December 8, 2023 decision. That decision dismissed their appeal from 

the immigration judge’s order denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the United Nations 

Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.

The statutory time limit required petitioners to file a petition for review on or before January 8, 2024, which was the first 

business day following 30 days after the December 8, 2023 decision. 

See INA § 242(b)(1), 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); Fed. R. App. P. 15(a)(1), 

26(a)(1)(C); Chao Lin v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 677 F.3d 1043, 1045-46 (11th 

Cir. 2012) (noting that the statutory time limit is mandatory, jurisdictional, and not subject to equitable tolling). However, Petitioners did not file their petition until February 21, 2024. We therefore 

lack jurisdiction to review it. 

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack 

of jurisdiction. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No 

USCA11 Case: 24-10517 Document: 8-1 Date Filed: 05/16/2024 Page: 2 of 3
24-10517 Opinion of the Court 3

petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.

USCA11 Case: 24-10517 Document: 8-1 Date Filed: 05/16/2024 Page: 3 of 3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JOHN HUTCHINSON,

Petitioner

v.

ANNVILLE TOWNSHIP (WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD),

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 489 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

JOHN HUTCHINSON,

Petitioner

v.

ANNVILLE TOWNSHIP (WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD),

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 490 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of June, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### Eddie MATTHEWS v. NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC SERVICE, INC.

No. 60799.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 1977.

In re: Eddie Matthews, applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 349 So.2d 408.

Writ denied.

CALOGERO, TATE and DENNIS, JJ., are of the opinion that writ should be granted.
Exhibit 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF JUNO LIGHTING, INC.

| |                          |  | State or Jurisdiction | 
| | ------------------------ |  | --------------------- | 
| | Name of Subsidiary       |  | of Incorporation      | 
| |                          |  |                       | 
| | Juno Manufacturing, Inc. |  | Illinois              | 
| | Indy Lighting, Inc.      |  | Indiana               | 
| | Juno Lighting, Ltd.      |  | Canada                | 
| | Alfa Lighting, Inc.      |  | California            |
**EXHIBIT
        23.02**
  CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  We
        hereby
        consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement
        on Form
        S-8 of our report **** dated
        March 1, 2004 relating to the financial statements of FNB Financial Services
        Corporation, which appears in FNB Financial Services Corporation's Annual
        Report
        on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
 
 
 /s/
        PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
 
 Raleigh,
        North Carolina
 September
        22, 2006
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

NICHOLAS CONEY , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1712

[ October 18, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Bernard I

. Bober

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 02

- 5030CF10B

.
Nicholas Coney, Okeechobee, pro se.

No brief required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

G ERBER , C.J., G ROSS and C IKLIN , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21480]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. ER97-3574-000; and OA97-608-000]


New England Power Pool; Notice of Filing

August 8, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 1, 1997, as supplemented on July 7, 1997, 
New England Power Pool tendered for filing changes to the provisions of 
the NEPOOL Agreement.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before August 21, 1997. Protests filed 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make the protestants parties 
to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21480 Filed 8-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001

43–820 PDF 2010

[ERRATA] 

S. HRG. 110–447 

CHILDHOOD OBESITY: THE DECLINING HEALTH 

OF AMERICA’S NEXT GENERATION—PART II 

HEARING 

BEFORE THE

SUBCOMMITTEE ON CHILDREN AND FAMILIES 

OF THE

COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, EDUCATION, 

LABOR, AND PENSIONS 

UNITED STATES SENATE 

ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS 

SECOND SESSION 

ON

EXAMINING CHILDHOOD OBESITY, FOCUSING ON THE DECLINING 

HEALTH OF AMERICA’S NEXT GENERATION NATIONAL PROBLEM, 

SOUTHERN CRISIS 

JULY 23, 2008 

Printed for the use of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

( 

Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/senate 

S. HRG. 110–447 

Part II of the above referenced publication was inadvertently printed 

with the incorrect explanation on the title page. The correct explanation should read EXAMINING CHILDHOOD OBESITY, FOCUSING 

ON THE DECLINING HEALTH OF AMERICA’S NEXT GENERATION (PART II).
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Gerald M. McNABB.

No. 61539.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 7, 1978.

In re: Writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order. East Baton Rouge Parish.

Writ denied. Stay order recalled.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-90338) on Form S-3 and the RegistrationStatements (Nos. 333-53224, 33-56844, 33-43595 and 33-16260) on Form S-8 of Immunomedics, Inc. of our report dated August 8, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2003 of Immunomedics, Inc. andsubsidiaries included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2003. 

 

ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

MetroPark, New Jersey 

September 23, 2003
No. 00-805.

#### Thornhill et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 98-1967.

#### F. W. Woolworth Co. et al. *v.*Franchise Tax Board.

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Hunt-Wesson, Inc.*v. *Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal., ante,*p. 458.
#### Steven Robert NOLLAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-562.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 1, 1977.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and NATHAN and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *State v. Barber,*301 So.2d 7 (Fla.1974); *State*v. *Matera,*266 So.2d 661 (Fla.1972); *Parks v. State,*301 So.2d 482 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); *Chapman v. State,*300 So.2d 749 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); *Parks v. State,*256 So.2d 40 (Fla.3d DCA 1971); and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed May 17 , 2016.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 16

- 00244

- CV

IN RE L & M BOTRUC R ENTAL, INC. , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS County Court No. 3 Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV

- 0072453



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On March 28, 2016, relator L & M Botruc Rental, Inc. filed a petition for
writ of m andamus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 ( West 2004);
see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this c ourt to compel the Honorable Jack Ewing, presiding judge of the County Court No. 3 of Galveston County
, to (1) vacate his March 10, 2016 “ Order Denying Botruc’s Motion to2

Dismiss Based on Forum Non Conveniens ” , and (2) dismiss the case for forum non
conveniens.
To obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate remedy by appeal. In
re Pr udential Ins. Co ., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).
Relator has not established that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Jamison, Donovan, and Brown.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Belarus [electronic resource].**
 
2002
Mar
Sep
2003
Mar
Oct
2004
Mar
Sep
2005
Jun
 
2007
May
Nov
2008
May
Nov
2009
May
Dec
 
 
SuDoc Number:ID 1.29:B 41/
Item Number:0900-I-20 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000632003
 
October 10, 2019
No. 45370.

#### Protest 894505-G of Western Novelty Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Butler*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303) the Rockingham-ware in question was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 23, 2010

p0616 

# Order

June 23, 2010

140493

SCOTT KROEGER and CANDY KROEGER, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 140493 COA: 286333 Monroe CC: 06-022559-CK AEC ENTERPRISES CONSTRUCTION, INC., AUBREY E. CROSBY, and LANDAMERICA TITLE CO., Defendants,

and

REPUBLIC BANK, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 22, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 134137 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 134137 COA: 274184 Wayne CC: 02-006678-01 STANLEY JEROME BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 14, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order. The prosecutor shall address whether th e defendant's trial atto rney was ineffective for failing to procure staff activity logs before trial. The prosecutor shall also address whether staff activity logs and the victim's deposition testimony from the civil case, to the extent that the deposition testim ony is inconsistent with th e victim's prior testimony, constitute new evidence that co uld justify a retrial under the standard for relief applicable to a motion for relie f from judgment.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.

d0421 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2008

Clerk
Di strict Clerk’s LetterOnReceipt NOAatt.wpd 

### CHRIS DANIEL

HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK

CIVIL/FAMILY POST TRIAL

DATE: JUNE 3, 2015

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS INFORMATION SHEET BY TRIAL COURT

CLERK

Note to trial court clerk: You are expected to file the clerk’s record by the original due date. If

you cannot, you should advise the Clerk of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals immediately in

writing, stating the reason and the date by which the record will be filed. Generally speaking,

for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two extensions from the original due

date, each extension not to exceed 30 days.

Appellate Case Number 14

- 14

- 00 365

- CV

Trial Court Case Number: 55 TH



### Trial Court Number 2010

- 79184

____________________________________________________________ __________________

Information from Trial Court Clerk

The clerk’s record will be completed and filed with the appellate court clerk by the

original due date, subject to payment arrangements being made.

The clerk’s record will not be filed by the original due date. (Please state re asons below)

Reason(s):

I believe I can file the clerk’s record by , and I request an extension.

X Appellant has not made payment arrangements. Record cost and Balance due $ 949 .00.

X Appellan t has been notified that the clerk’s record is ready.

Appellant has made payment arrangements.

CHRIS DANIEL,

CLERK DISTRICT COURT,

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

BY: /s/ PHYLLIS WASHINGTON

### AP1 R04

- 30

- 92 JUNE 3 , 2015

GREGORY K. SAXE TBN#17694900

ATTY AT LAW

6666 HARWIN DR STE 600

HOUSTON, TX 77036

PH: 713

- 995

- 5733

FX: 713

- 995

- 5122

Re: No. 2010

- 79184 SENT VIA: FAX ONLY



### Dear Customer:

This letter is to inform you of the balance, which represents the cost to our office of preparing, at your request,

the Original Clerk’s Record in the above numbere d case. Rule (35.3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure requires that payment of this cost be remitted to our office prior to forwarding the clerk’s r ecord to

the Court of Appeals.

ORIGINAL CLERKS RECORD $ 943.00

LESS DEPOSIT PAID $0.00

DELIVERED TO THE 14TH COURT OF APPEALS

BALANCE DUE $ 943.00

You may remit your payment in the form of attorney or law firm check, money order or cashier’s check, payable to Chris Daniel,

District Clerk, by mailing to: Chris Daniel, District Clerk, Attn: Civil/Family Post Trial, P.O. Box 4651, Houston, TX 77210

-

4651.

Payment also may be remitted in person at the following lo cation: Chris Daniel, District Clerk, Civil/Family Post Trial, 201

Caroline, Room 250, Houston, TX 77002.

Please be informed that this correspondence is the only notice you will receive from this office regarding this payment.

CHRIS DANIEL,

CLERK DISTRICT COURT,

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

BY: /s/ PHYLLIS WASHINGTON

PHYLLIS WASHINGTON

, DEPUTY
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 149 (Monday, August 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41955]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20431]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-428-000]


Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

July 29, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 25, 1997, Tuscarora Gas Transmission 
Company (Tuscarora) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to become effective 
August 26, 1997:

First Revised Sheet No. 85

    Tuscarora asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
Ordering Paragraph B of Order No. 636-C, issued February 27, 1997, in 
Docket Nos. RM91-11-006 and RM87-34-072. In Order No. 636-C, the 
Commission required that any pipeline with a right-of-first-refusal 
tariff provision containing a contract term longer than five years 
revise its tariff to reflect the new five year cap.
    Tuscarora states that copies of this filing were mailed to all 
customers of Tuscarora and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20431 Filed 8-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Energy Convergence program concludes, legacy system decommissioned

By Christopher GoulaitDLA Energy Public Affairs

                FORT BELVOIR, Virginia  –                                            - Oil Enterprise Downstream/Oracle Government Financials
                              - The Fuels Enterprise Server
                              - Paperless Ordering Receipts Transaction Screens
                              - The Defense Fuels Automated Management System/Automated Voucher Examination Disbursing System
                              - The Requirements Manager Suite
                              - The Web Distribution Planning Authority

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Energy ConvergenceEnterprise Business Systemcost savingsBusiness Process SupportDLA Information OperationsDLA FinanceDLA Energy
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  each of the  undersigned  officers  GS  AgriFuels
Corporation (the "Company"), certifies that:

     1.   The  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-QSB of the  Company  for the three
          months ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




             /S/  Kevin Kreisler
                  ------------------------------------
                  Kevin Kreisler
                  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Date:             November 14, 2006


This  certification  is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,
subject  to the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and not for any other
purpose.
**Skip to ContentVideo: "Medicare Part D: Prescription Drug Coverage"
 

Medicare Part D provides prescription drug coverage.

Video courtesy of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
**