alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41453-41454]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20314]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Docket Nos. 50-295 and 50-304]


Commonwealth Edison Company; Zion Nuclear Power Station; Notice 
of Temporary Partial Closing of Local Public Document Room

    Notice is hereby given that the Waukegan Public Library, Waukegan, 
Illinois, which serves as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) local 
public document room (LPDR) for the Commonwealth Edison Company's Zion 
Generating Station, will undergo extensive building renovation 
beginning

[[Page 41454]]

August 4, 1997. The renovation is scheduled to be completed in 18 
months. During this period portions of the LPDR collection will be 
inaccessible to the public. The paper records issued prior to January 
1, 1981, will be removed from the library and placed in storage. The 
records issued since January 1981, which are available on microfiche, 
will remain accessible to the public.
    During this period, every effort will be made to meet the 
informational needs of LPDR patrons. Persons interested in using 
records issued prior to 1981 in the Zion LPDR collection while the 
Library is undergoing renovation are asked to contact the NRC LPDR 
staff at 800-638-8081, toll-free. Requests for records may also be 
addressed to the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), Gelman Building, 
2120 L Street NW, Washington, DC 20555-0001. The telephone number is 
800-397-4209, toll-free.
    Questions concerning the NRC's LPDR program or the availability of 
agency documents in the Waukegan area should be addressed to Ms. Jona 
L. Souder, LPDR Program Manager, Freedom of Information/Local Public 
Document Room Branch, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, 
DC 20555-0001, telephone number 800-638-8081.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day of July 1997.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Russell A. Powell,
Chief, Freedom of Information/Local Public Document Room Branch, Office 
of Information Resources Management.
[FR Doc. 97-20314 Filed 7-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
| Date                of Report (date of earliest event reported): |  February                28, 2006 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|

| TERABEAM,                INC.                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (Exact                name of registrant as specified in its                charter) |

| Delaware                                                      | 000-29053                               | 04-2751645                                       |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| (State                or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (Commission                file number) | (IRS                employer identification no.) |

| 2115                O’Nel Drive, San Jose, CA     | 95131                     |
|---------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|
| (Address                of principal executive offices) | (Zip                code) |

| Registrant’s                telephone number, including area code: | (408)                731-2700 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|

| Not                Applicable                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (Former                name or former address, if changed since last                report) |

----

|                                    | TERABEAM,                INC. |                                       |
|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                    |                          |                                       |   |
|                                    |                          |                                       |   |
|                                    |                          |                                       |   |
| Dated:                February 28, 2006 | By:                           | /s/                David L. Renauld   |   |
|                                    |                          | David                L. Renauld            |   |
|                                    |                          | Vice                President              |   |

| Number  |     Title                         |
|--------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|         |                                                  |
| 99.1         | Press                release dated February 28, 2006. |
R-98

.

Bon. C. J. WiJdar

County Audi

tar Nueoes County Corpus Christi, Texas Opinion No. V-99 Rs: Traveling expenses of Justice of the Pea00 D Dear Sir:. Your request for an opinion from this Department ORthe above subject Aaattsr is as follows:

"The Wt&% 0r POiOe Or %SOiIIOt 1, Plaoe ,11 an8 Pxeoinot 1, Place 2 or Nuwes Ceunty have r?quested that we make than an aJ.lowancr 

### or $7,50 to cover sxgendbs or their automobiles in attsr&&$ ray inquests tithin the oounty. la view of the fact bhat in this County thb Pm slaet orrmm l

### r* on a salary bada wa Wl&umt

ilsra anJ Statute that .wauld d&&an ulb 

## to pry tk $l4tt fee for anything of thfe natllrep ~Xt Is quite pos-

. aible that we might be able, to make an 

### afAawarur*

far say +lrlgWlU~ iA ooanaotiog wWi the k6btiw 

### oran inqwst by 

### permitting a &iwge to bs aa@ wd a mileage basis ror the use Or their autfmobilsa. Other thlra this X ao not. believe it poseibS6 to sake bay payment for any exj pensr$ $A$

mndeetiim with said inqurats.

u,erriwr is not entitled to 

### mileage or expensrr, 

## rar the .opbration or his autombile unlars there id aam )re;rr&ra 10 #he ntatutae providing ror the agson* bf 8UQh

6*gsnae#. Hammoad v. Harris County, 24 fi 0I.W. IOO2,, bX*rPtr*&aPlis&l; Hprris CiiuMy *. Hmao&, 803 S.W. 445; 34 @!hr. rur. 545.

Artidle 3933a-1 authorizes the Ccmoise~ners’ Uour%ia counticss oontaining a population of 355,000 orHon. C. J. Wilde - Page 2 (V-99)

more inhabitants

according to the last precedingFederal Census,'to

make a reasonableallowancenot to exceed Fifty ($50.00)

Dollars per month to the Justice of the Peace for the operationof his automobilein the dischargeof his officialduties. We fall to find any comparablestatute applicableto Nueces County providing for the payment of mileage ta:'a

Justice of the Peac,e for the expenses of operatinghis automobile*

In view of the foregoing,it is our opinion that the Just&es ,of the Peace of Preolnot 1, Place 1,and Precinct 1; PlacB 2, would not be ,entitled to an allowance of $?.50,to cover expenses (3f their automobilesin attending inquests within the county.

The Justices of the Peace of Precinct 1, Place.

1, and Precinct l,,Place 2 of iiueces

County are not entitled to mlf'leag;e:for

the operationof their automobiles in,attendinginquestswithin the county, Yours very truly, ATTORNEYGENESAL OF TEXAS

JR:ajm:wb

APPROVEDMARCH 22, 1947
52 22 ATTORNEYGENERAL OF TEXAS
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB/A of Global
Wataire, Inc. for the quarter ending 31 May 2007, I, Sydney A. Harland, Chief
Executive Officer of Global Wataire, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending , fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ending , fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Global Wataire, Inc.




Dated:  1
July 2008




/s/  Sydney
A.
Harland


Sydney A.
Harland, Chief Executive Officer of


Global
Wataire, Inc.
#### Ellis *v.*Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

*Insurance*— Life *insurance*— Application *attached to policy*— Act *of May 11,1881, P. L. §0.*

In an action upon a policy of life insurance the insured may offer in evidence the policy without the copy of the application attached to the policy, where it appears from an inspection of the papers that the copy attached to the policy was not a correct copy of the original application signed by the insured.

Argued March 7, 1910.

May 9, 1910:

Appeal, No. 173, Jan. T., 1909, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Northampton Co., April T., 1906, No. 40, on verdict for plaintiffs in case of Mary Ellis, Elizabeth Jones and Emily Griffith, by her next friend, J. Ruskin Jones, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.

Before Pell, C. J., Brown, Elkin, Stewart and Moschzisker, JJ.

Affirmed.

Assumpsit on a policy of life insurance. Before Scott, P. J.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.

Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $1,839.25. Defendant appealed. ■

*Error assigned*was iii admitting the policy in evidence.

*G. W. Geiser,*with him *F. E. Geiser,*for appellant.

*E. J. Fox,*with him *J. W. Fox*and *A. N. XJlrich,*for appellee.

Per Curiam,

The main argument for the' appellant is intended to show error at the trial in admitting in evidence the policy of life insurance on which the action was brought, without the copy of the application of the insured which was *231attached to the policy when it was delivered. It appeared from an inspection of the papers that the copy attached to the policy was not a correct copy of the original application signed by the insured, because the answers to certain questions, relating to the subject-matter on which the defense was based, made by the insured in the original statement to the medical examiner were entirely omitted from the copy, or incorrectly given.

The statement made to the medical examiner was a part of the application: Morris v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co., 183 Pa. 563; Fisher v. Fidelity Mut. Life Association, 188 Pa. 1; and unless a correct copy of it was attached to the policy, it could not under the Act of May 11, 1881, P. L. 20, be considered a part of the policy or contract between the parties.

The defendant could not have put the incorrect copy in evidence, nor could he require the plaintiff to do so. The act is intended to protect the policy holder: Lenox v. Greenwich Ins. Co., 165 Pa. 575. It was passed in the interest of fair dealing, and its provisions should be strictly enforced: Pickett v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co., 14 Pa. 79.

The judgment is affirmed.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1152 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate discriminatory 

copayment rates for outpatient psychiatric services under the Medicare 

Program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2005 

Ms. SNOWE (for herself, Mr. KERRY, Mr. SMITH, and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate 

discriminatory copayment rates for outpatient psychiatric 

services under the Medicare Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Mental 

5 Health Copayment Equity Act of 2005’’. 
2

•S 1152 IS

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF DISCRIMINATORY COPAYMENT 

2 RATES FOR MEDICARE OUTPATIENT PSY3 CHIATRIC SERVICES. 

4 Section 1833(c) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 1395l(c)) is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(c)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this 

7 part, with respect to expenses incurred in a calendar year 

8 in connection with the treatment of mental, psycho9 neurotic, and personality disorders of an individual who 

10 is not an inpatient of a hospital at the time such expenses 

11 are incurred, there shall be considered as incurred ex12 penses for purposes of subsections (a) and (b)— 

13 ‘‘(A) for expenses incurred in any year before 

2006, only 621 14 ⁄2 percent of such expenses; 

‘‘(B) for expenses incurred in 2006, only 683 15 ⁄4

16 percent of such expenses; 

17 ‘‘(C) for expenses incurred in 2007, only 75 

18 percent of such expenses; 

‘‘(D) for expenses incurred in 2008, only 811 19 ⁄4

20 percent of such expenses; 

‘‘(E) for expenses incurred in 2009, only 871 21 ⁄2

22 percent of such expenses; 

‘‘(F) for expenses incurred in 2010, only 933 23 ⁄4

24 percent of such expenses; and 

25 ‘‘(G) for expenses incurred in 2011, or any sub26 sequent year, 100 percent of such expenses. 
3

•S 1152 IS

1 ‘‘(2) For purposes of subparagraphs (A) through (F) 

2 of paragraph (1), the term ‘treatment’ does not include 

3 brief office visits (as defined by the Secretary) for the sole 

4 purpose of monitoring or changing drug prescriptions used 

5 in the treatment of such disorders or partial hospitaliza6 tion services that are not directly provided by a physi7 cian.’’.

Æ
#### Frankie L. CLEMENTS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-969.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 14, 1977.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Ira N. Loewy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Frankie L. Clements appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate pursuant to Rule 3.850, Fla.R.Crim.P.

Clements was charged with robbery in April of 1972. He pled guilty and was sentenced to life imprisonment. In May of 1972, Clements filed a pro se motion to vacate judgment and sentence alleging that his guilty plea was not voluntarily entered due to his mental and physical imcompe-tence inasmuch as he was severely injured and under the influence of drugs. The motion was summarily denied. A second motion to vacate was filed, and summarily denied. This appeal ensued.

The record before this court reflects that the trial judge who accepted the plea of guilty was no longer presiding at the time the motion was heard, and that the transcript of the plea proceedings is unavailable. Thus, there were no records before the trial court at the time that Clement’s motion was heard which conclusively refutes the allegations. For this reason, Clements is entitled to an evidentiary hearing. *Winegard v. State,*234 So.2d 166 (Fla.2d DCA 1970).

Reversed and remanded.
No. 96-5936.

#### Bierley *v.*Franz, District Director, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David G. Gionco, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of
  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   
|---
|(1)
|   
|(2)

|    |  |                                                                     
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ David G. Gionco                                                 
|    |  |                                                                     
|    |  | David G. GioncoVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

March 2, 2009



---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 129777(25) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129777 COA: 263780 Bay CC: 97-001217-FH, JON MICHAEL EDGAR, 00-001344-FH, 01-001473-FH Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 26, 2006 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it doe s not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

d0122 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 29, 2007

Clerk
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1295 

To amend the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to provide for accountability 

and funding of the National Indian Gaming Commission. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 23, 2005 

Mr. MCCAIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL

To amend the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to provide 

for accountability and funding of the National Indian 

Gaming Commission.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Indian Gam5 ing Commission Accountability Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COMMISSION ACCOUNTABILITY AND FUNDING. 

7 (a) POWERS OF THE COMMISSION.—Section 7 of the 

8 Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2706) is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following: 
2

•S 1295 IS

1 ‘‘(d) APPLICATION OF GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE

2 AND RESULTS ACT.— 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In carrying out any action 

4 under this Act, the Commission shall be subject to 

5 the Government Performance and Results Act of 

6 1993 (Public Law 103–62; 107 Stat. 285). 

7 ‘‘(2) PLANS.—In addition to any plan required 

8 under the Government Performance and Results Act 

9 of 1993 (Public Law 103–62; 107 Stat. 285), the 

10 Commission shall submit a plan to provide technical 

11 assistance to tribal gaming operations in accordance 

12 with that Act.’’. 

13 (b) COMMISSION FUNDING.—Section 18(a)(2) of the 

14 Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2717(a)(2)) is 

15 amended by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the 

16 following: 

17 ‘‘(B) The total amount of all fees imposed 

18 during any fiscal year under the schedule estab19 lished under paragraph (1) shall not exceed 

20 0.080 percent of the gross gaming revenues of 

21 all gaming operations subject to regulation 

22 under this Act.’’.

Æ
#### Thomas W. MYERS, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 76-1102, 76-1110 and 76-1111.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 15, 1977.

Jeffrey R. Jontz of Young, Turnbull & Linscott, P. A., Orlando, for appellants.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

The Appellants here raise three issues for our consideration, only one of which we feel is worthy of relief. Each of the Appellants were sentenced to terms of probation after pleas of guilty to a charge of conspiracy to commit grand larceny. That charge is a first degree misdemeanor. It is therefore punishable by no more than one year imprisonment. As has been stated before the maximum term of probation and incarceration to which a court may sentence a person cannot exceed, in the aggregate, the amount to which the court could sentence that person to incarceration. Therefore to sentence these Defendants to more than one year on probation or more than one year of probation and incarceration is illegal. *Holmes v. State,*343 So.2d 632 (Fla. 4th DCA, Opinion filed February 11, 1977); *State v. Jones,*327 So.2d 18 (Fla.1976); *Moore v. State,*324 So.2d 690 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); *Magnin v. State,*334 So.2d 638 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Watts *v. State,*328 So.2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

The sentence of Thomas W. Myers, Jr. is hereby modified by reducing it to four months probation after he completes his eight months in the county jail. The sentence of Carson Myers is hereby modified by reducing it to six months probation after he completes his six months in the county jail. The sentence of John Sutton is hereby modified by reducing it to 305 days probation after he serves his 60 days in the county jail.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 3.6



               CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF MEDICAL NUTRITION, INC.
               ---------------------------------------------------

                  The undersigned corporation, organized under the laws of the
State of New Jersey, certifies the following to effect an amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation, on Board action, with shareholder approval, in
accordance with New Jersey Statute 14A:9-1, et seq., and in accordance
therewith:

                  FIRST:   The name of the corporation is Medical Nutrition,
                           Inc.

                  SECOND:  To affect the Amendment, Paragraph Fourth of the
                           Certification of Incorporation is amended in its
                           entirety as follows:

                           Fourth:  The aggregate number of shares that the
                           corporation shall have authority to issue is
                           10,000,000, all of which shall be without nominal or
                           par value. All or part of such shares may be issued
                           by the company from time to time, and for such
                           consideration, as may be determined, upon and fixed
                           by the Board of Directors, as provided by law. The
                           Board of Directors shall have the power to amend the
                           company's Certificate of Incorporation to effectuate
                           the division of shares into classes and into series
                           within any class or classes, the determination of the
                           designation and number of shares of any class or
                           series, the determination of the relative rights,
                           preferences and limitations of the shares of any
                           class or series, in any or all of such divisions and
                           determinations.

                  THIRD:   A resolution approving this amendment to the
                           Certification of Incorporation was duly adopted by
                           the Board of Directors and approved by vote of the
                           shareholders on January 12, 1990.

                  FOURTH:  The number of outstanding shares entitled to vote
                           upon this amendment at the shareholder meeting of
                           January 12, 1990 was equal to 1,338,170.

                  FIFTH:   1,248,237 shares voted in favor of the amendment. No
                           shares voted in opposition to said amendment.

                  SIXTH:   This Amendment shall become effective upon the filing
                           of this Certificate of Amendment.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Medical Nutrition, Inc. has caused its
duly authorized officer to execute this Certificate and Amendment on February
13, 1990.


                                       /s/ ARNOLD GANS
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       By: ARNOLD GANS, President