alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                            2900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2533
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1001
<INVENTORY>                                        580
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6159
<PP&E>                                            4405
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2443
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   12932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1149
<BONDS>                                            599
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           199
<OTHER-SE>                                       10985
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     12932
<SALES>                                           2106
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 23828
<CGS>                                             1166
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    17202
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  4268
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  85
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1287
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1331)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2618
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2618
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), the undersigned officer of Immunomedics. Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Dated: September 13, 2007            
|                                     
|/s/ CYNTHIA L. SULLIVAN              
|Cynthia L. Sullivan                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Energy donates toys to Toys for Tots Program

By Irene SmithDLA Energy Public Affairs

                FORT BELVOIR, Virginia  –              area toy drop locationstoysfortots.org

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA EnergyToys for Tots
**Exhibit 99**

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of American Spectrum Realty, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William J. Carden, President,Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results ofoperations of the Company for the period indicated.

 

 
| */s/ William J. Carden*                                                |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| William J.  Carden                                                     |
| President, Chief Executive Officer  and Acting Chief Financial Officer |
|                                                                   |
|                                                                   |
| May 12, 2003                                                           |

 

----
No. 00-6817.

#### Bailey *v.*Moore, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

Certification of Treasurer



I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Big Sky Industries VI, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: February 25, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (Nos. 333-128310, 333-114810 and 333-90338) on Form S-3 and the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-143420, 333-53224, 33-56844, 33-43595 and 33-16260) on Form S-8 of Immunomedics, Inc. (“Immunomedics”) of our reportsdated August 22, 2008 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Immunomedics and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Immunomedics, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for theyear ended June 30, 2008. 

**/s/ Ernst & Young LLP**

MetroPark, New Jersey 

August 26, 2008
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA HQ employees remember the real-life Titans 

By Chris Erbe

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

TitansSportsMotivation;Presentationresiliency; People & CultureResiliency
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2115]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-408-017]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

January 23, 1997.
    Take notice that on January 17, 1997, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets set 
forth on Appendix A to the filing, to become effective on February 1, 
1997.
    On December 31, 1996, Columbia filed with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (Commission) to move pursuant to Section 4(e) of 
the Natural Gas Act to place into effect on February 1, 1997, the rates 
set forth in its November 22, 1996 Offer of Settlement in this 
proceeding, contingent upon approval and implementation of the 
Settlement. The Settlement rates were set forth in Appendix A of the 
December 31, 1996 motion rate filing. It has come to Columbia's 
attention that the minimum commodity rate applicable to both firm and 
interruptible gathering services shown on First Revised Ninth Revised 
Sheet No. 30 in the motion rate filing is incorrect due strictly to an 
advertent clerical error. Columbia is submitting the instant filing to 
correct this error. Columbia is also reflecting on this sheet the 
processing charges that result from the Settlement effective as of 
February 1, 1997.
    Certain other rate tariff sheets are being refiled to indicate in a 
footnote that a customer's acceptance and payment of invoices based on 
the Settlement rates shall constitute such customer's agreement to pay 
the surcharge (subject to refund) if the Settlement is not approved and 
implemented. This language was indicated in the transmittal letter to 
the Initial Settlement motion filing of December 31, 1996, but 
inadvertently omitted from the tariff sheets.
    Columbia states that copies of its filing have been mailed to 
Columbia's customers and all affected state commissions, as well as to 
all parties on the official service list to this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before January 27, 1997. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2115 Filed 1-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1217 CA 13-02070**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, FAHEY, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

PEGGY J. SMITH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CITY OF BUFFALO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

FRANK S. FALZONE, BUFFALO (LOUIS ROSADO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY A. BALL, CORPORATION COUNSEL, BUFFALO (DAVID M. LEE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Walker, A.J.), entered January 22, 2013. The order granted the motion of defendant for leave to reargue, and upon reargument, granted the motion of defendant for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In this action seeking damages for injuries that plaintiff allegedly sustained when she fell into an uncovered manhole, plaintiff appeals from an order that granted defendant’s motion for leave to reargue its prior motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and, upon reargument, granted the prior motion. In seeking reargument, defendant again asserted that it did not receive prior written notice of the dangerous condition as required by its local law. Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, Supreme Court properly granted the motion for leave to reargue. The court originally denied the prior motion on the ground that issues of fact precluded summary judgment, and upon reargument the court determined that the motion raised issues of law that must be decided by the court, including whether the local law applies to this case. “A motion for leave to reargue . . . shall be based upon matters of fact or law allegedly overlooked or misapprehended by the court in determining the prior motion” (CPLR 2221 [d]). Thus, a motion for leave “to reargue ‘may be granted only upon a showing that the court overlooked or misapprehended the facts or the law, or for some reason mistakenly arrived at its earlier decision’ ” ( Andrea v E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. [appeal No. 2], 289 AD2d 1039, 1040-1041, lv denied 97 NY2d 609). Here, contrary to plaintiff’s contention, the court properly granted leave to reargue after concluding that it had misapprehended the law, because the issue whether the prior written notice statute applied was**-2- 1217 CA 13-02070** 

one of law for the court to decide, rather than one of fact for the jury ( see generally Cayuga Indian Nation of N.Y. v Gould , 14 NY3d 614, 635, cert denied ___ US ___, 131 S Ct 353; Matter of Held v New York State Workers’ Compensation Bd. , 58 AD3d 971, 972-973).

Entered: November 21, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2290 

To authorize the Commissioner of the United States Section, International 

Boundary and Water Commission, to reimburse States and units of 

local government for expenses incurred by the States and units of local 

government in designing, constructing, and rehabilitating water projects 

under the jurisdiction of the International Boundary and Water Commission. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 17, 2012 

Mr. CORNYN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To authorize the Commissioner of the United States Section, 

International Boundary and Water Commission, to reimburse States and units of local government for expenses 

incurred by the States and units of local government 

in designing, constructing, and rehabilitating water 

projects under the jurisdiction of the International 

Boundary and Water Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2290 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘International Bound3 ary and Water Commission Reimbursement Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZED REIMBURSEMENT FOR CERTAIN 

5 WATER PROJECTS. 

6 The Commissioner of the United States Section, 

7 International Boundary and Water Commission (referred 

8 to in this section as the ‘‘Commission’’), may reimburse 

9 States and units of local government for expenses incurred 

10 by the States and units of local governments in designing, 

11 constructing, and rehabilitating water projects that— 

12 (1) are under the jurisdiction of the Commis13 sion; and 

14 (2) are designed, constructed, or rehabilitated 

15 before, on, or after the date of enactment of this 

16 Act. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of MFIC Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K forthe period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer ofthe Company does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                                  | By:    | /s/  DENNIS P.  RIORDAN                            |
|----------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                             | Name:  | Dennis P. Riordan                                       |
|                             | Title: | Controller(Principal Financial and  Accounting Officer) |
|                             |   |                                                    |
|                             |   |                                                    |
| Dated:  March 30, 2006 |   |                                                    |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Bradley J. DodsonName:
    Bradley J. DodsonDate:
    April 29, 2010
EXHIBIT 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
            --------------------------------------------------------

The Board of Directors
Central Jersey Bancorp:

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements  No.
333-100893,  No. 333-122468 and No. 333-125658 on Form S-8 and No. 333-131640 on
Form S-3 of Central  Jersey Bancorp of our reports dated March 14, 2007 relating
to the consolidated  statements of financial condition of Central Jersey Bancorp
and  subsidiary as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,  and the related  consolidated
statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, management's assessment of the
effectiveness  of internal  control over financial  reporting as of December 31,
2006 and the  effectiveness  of internal  control  over  financial  reporting as
December 31, 2006,  which reports  appear in the December 31, 2006 annual report
on Form 10-K of Central Jersey Bancorp.


                                  /s/ KPMG LLP

Short Hills, New Jersey
March 14, 2007