alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
June 2015

EPA Region 9

Rule 312 Abrasive Blasting

Rule 314 Open Outdoor Fires and Indoor Fireplaces at Commercial and Institutional Establishments

Rule 316 Nonmetallic Mineral Processing

Rule 318 Approval of Residential Woodburning Devices

Rule 320 Odors and Gaseous Air Contaminants

Rule 325 Brick and Structural Clay Products (BSCP) Manufacturing

Rule 331 Solvent Cleaning

Rule 334 Rubber Sports Ball Manufacturing

Rule 335 Architectural Coatings

Rule 336 Surface Coating Operations

Rule 337 Graphic Arts

Rule 338 Semiconductor Manufacturing

Rule 339 Vegetable Oil Extraction Processes

Rule 340 Cutback and Emulsified Asphalt

Rule 341 Metal Investment Casting

Rule 342 Coating Wood Furniture and Fixtures

Rule 343 Commercial Bread Bakeries

Rule 344 Automotive Windshield Washer Fluid

Rule 345 Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating

Rule 346 Coating Wood Millwork

Rule 347 Ferrous Sand Casting

Rule 348 Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Operations

Rule 349 Pharmaceutical, Cosmetic and Vitamin Manufacturing Operations

Rule 351 Loading of Organic Liquids

Rule 352 Gasoline Delivery Vessel Testing and Use

Rule 353 Gasoline in Stationary Dispensing Tanks

Rule 358 Polystyrene Foam Operations

http://www.maricopa.gov/aq/divisions/planning_analysis/AdoptedRules.aspx

http://apps.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-02.pdf 

List of Additional Source Category-Specific Rules in Maricopa County

*Review compared Maricopa County 300 series of rules and Article 7 of ADEQ's rules. Review did not 

include NSPS/NESHAP standards adopted by reference or comparison of source-specific rules for the 28 

source category list (see 40 CFR 51.166(b)(1)(iii).
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries III, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: January 30, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries III, Inc.
Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Jagged Peak, Inc. (the Company),
hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 26, 2010, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |                              
|----------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: May 6, 2010
|                  | 
|By:               |  | /s/ Paul B. Demirdjian       
|                  |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                  |  | (Principle Executive Officer)
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Fire Prevention Week 2015 highlights importance of smoke detectors

By Christine BornDLA Public Affairs

                Fort Belvoir, Virginia  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

fire preventionsmoke alarmDLA
# Uradni list C 94A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-1045
  doi:10.3000/19771045.CA2013.094.slv |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 94A |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Zvezek 563. april 2013 |

ISSN 1977-1045

doi:10.3000/19771045.CA2013.094.slv

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 94A

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Zvezek 563. april 2013

---

| Obvestilo št. | Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Popravki |
| 2013/C 094A/01 | Popravek razpisa javnega natečaja EPSO/AD/248/13 – Upravni uslužbenci (AD 6) v stavbnem sektorju (UL C 29 A, 31.1.2013) | 1 |

Obvestilo št.

Vsebina

Stran

Popravki

2013/C 094A/01

Popravek razpisa javnega natečaja EPSO/AD/248/13 – Upravni uslužbenci (AD 6) v stavbnem sektorju (UL C 29 A, 31.1.2013)

(UL C 29 A, 31.1.2013)

1

PREGLED NATEČAJEV UL C A

Spodaj je naveden seznam UL C A, objavljenih v tekočem letu.

Če ni drugače navedeno, so bili UL objavljeni v vseh jezikovnih različicah.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 27 | (RO) |
| 29 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |
| 36 | (DA) |
| 41 | (BG) |
| 43 | (EN) |
| 49 | (ET) |
| 50 | (HU) |
| 51 | (SL) |
| 54 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 58 | (EN/GA) |
| 75 | |
| 81 | |
| 82 | |
| 88 | (BG) |
| 89 | (CS) |
| 94 | |

5

27

(RO)

29

33

34

36

(DA)

41

(BG)

43

(EN)

49

(ET)

50

(HU)

51

(SL)

54

(DE/EN/FR)

58

(EN/GA)

75

81

82

88

(BG)

89

(CS)

94

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

Popravki

| 3.4.2013 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | CA 94/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2013

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

CA 94/1

---

Popravek razpisa javnega natečaja EPSO/AD/248/13 – Upravni uslužbenci (AD 6) v stavbnem sektorju

(
  Uradni list Evropske unije C 29 A z dne 31. januarja 2013
  )

(2013/C 94 A/01)

Stran 3, oddelek IV. PRISTOPNI TESTI:

besedilo:

„Pristopne teste organizira urad EPSO in se opravljajo prek računalnika. Izbirna komisija določi stopnjo težavnosti in potrdi vsebino testov, ki jih predlaga urad EPSO.

Pristopni testi bodo organizirani, če bo prijavljenih več kot 1000 kandidatov na področje. Kandidati bodo o tem obveščeni prek računa EPSO.“

se glasi:

„Računalniško podprti pristopni testi bodo organizirani le, če bo število prijavljenih kandidatov presegalo določen prag. Ta prag določi direktor urada EPSO v svoji vlogi organa za imenovanja, in sicer po preteku roka za prijavo. Za posamezna področja je lahko določen različen prag. Kandidati bodo o tem obveščeni prek računa EPSO.

Komisija določi stopnjo težavnosti testov in potrdi njihovo vsebino, ki jo predlaga urad EPSO.“

Stran 4, oddelek V, točka 1(a), drugi odstavek:

besedilo:

„Če so najprej organizirani pristopni testi, se preveri izpolnjevanje splošnih in posebnih pogojev, in sicer po padajočem vrstnem redu števila točk, dobljenih pri pristopnih testih, dokler ni za posamezno področje izbranih 1000 kandidatov, ki:“

se glasi:

„Če so najprej organizirani pristopni testi, se preveri izpolnjevanje splošnih in posebnih pogojev, in sicer po padajočem vrstnem redu števila dobljenih točk po področjih, dokler ni doseženo število kandidatov, ki ga določi organ za imenovanja, ki:“.

---
No. 47775.

#### Protests 614691-G, etc., of Heinsheimer Bros., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J*.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664) the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) was sustained.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

Certification of President



I, Ramon Chimelis, President, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Big Sky Industries IV, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: February 2, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President
#### Mazie Lee BUTLER et al. v. Leslie TERRELL, Jr. and Leslie Terrell, Sr.

No. 49516.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

July 27, 1977.

Richard E. Stratton, III, Brookhaven, for appellants.

Hobbs, Hobbs & Peeples, Ralph L. Pee-ples, Brookhaven, for appellees.

Before PATTERSON, P. J., and SMITH and LEE, JJ.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Lincoln County; Mike Carr, Chancellor.

AFFIRMED.

GILLESPIE, C. J., took no part.
#### William L. MAXWELL, Appellant, v. STATE v. Missouri, Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 28, 1998.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 30,1998.

David C. Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Louis, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, William L. Maxwell, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing after he pled guilty to delivery of controlled substance, RSMo section 195.211 (1994). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, *32we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 10.2


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO


WJ COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


AMENDED AND RESTATED


2000 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR


STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


 


This Second Amendment to the WJ Communications, Inc.
(the “Company”) Amended and Restated 2000 Non-Employee Director Stock Compensation
Plan (the “Non-Employee Director Plan”), is made pursuant to Section 12 of the
Non-Employee Director Plan.


 


WHEREAS, the
2000 Non-Employee Director Stock Compensation Plan was first adopted by the
Company and approved by the stockholders in August 2000;


 


WHEREAS, the 2000 Non-Employee Director Stock
Compensation Plan was amended and restated by the Company in 2003 to (i)
increase the available shares authorized for issuance from 570,000 to 800,000
and (ii) provide for restructured director compensation arrangements;


 


WHEREAS, the Non-Employee Director Plan was
submitted to and approved by the stockholders on July 15, 2003;


 


WHEREAS, in 2006 in connection with the Company’s
annual meeting, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Non-Employee
Director Plan to increase the number of shares available from 800,000 to
1,000,000 (the “First Amendment”);


 


WHEREAS, the First Amendment was approved by the
stockholders at the Company’s annual meeting on July 20, 2006;


 


WHEREAS, in 2007 in connection with the Company’s
annual meeting the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Non-Employee
Director Plan to increase the number of shares available from 1,000,000 to
1,250,000 (the “Second Amendment”) and


 


WHEREAS, the Second Amendment was approved by the
stockholders at the Company’s annual meeting on July 19, 2007.


 


NOW
THEREFORE:


 


Section 5 of the
Non-Employee Director Plan is amended to delete “1,000,000” and insert “1,250,000”
in its place to reflect an increase in the shares reserved for use under the
Non-Employee Director Plan.


 


All other terms and
conditions of the Non-Employee Director Plan remain in full force and effect.


 


The Second Amendment to the
Non-Employee Director Plan was approved by the Board of Directors on June 8,
2007 and submitted to, and approved by, the Company’s stockholders in
connection with the Company’s July 19, 2007 annual meeting.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2268 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2268

   To ensure that all items offered for sale in any gift shop of the 
     National Park Service or of the National Archives and Records 
    Administration are produced in the United States, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 2012

Mrs. Gillibrand introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To ensure that all items offered for sale in any gift shop of the 
     National Park Service or of the National Archives and Records 
    Administration are produced in the United States, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Parks American Products 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRING THAT ITEMS SOLD IN CERTAIN FEDERAL GIFT SHOPS ARE 
              PRODUCED IN THE UNITED STATES.

    (a) National Park Service.--The Secretary of the Interior shall 
ensure that all items offered for sale in any gift shop or visitor's 
center located within a unit of the National Park System are produced 
in the United States.
    (b) National Archives and Records Administration.--The Archivist of 
the United States shall ensure that all items offered for sale in any 
gift shop of the National Archives and Records Administration are 
produced in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

GARRETT CUNNINGHAM,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2150

[June 4, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Kathleen M. McHugh, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 13-013517 CF10A.

Garrett Cunningham, Crawfordville, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, FORST and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Willie TOOKS and Bennie McCurty v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50432.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 15, 1978.

Fred M. Harrell, Jr., Brandon, for appellants.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Wayne Snuggs, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and WALKER, and BROOM, JJ.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             772
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2154
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1025
<INVENTORY>                                        749
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3047
<PP&E>                                            3517
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1947
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              993
<BONDS>                                            681
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          6
<COMMON>                                           146
<OTHER-SE>                                        4258
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6084
<SALES>                                           2348
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 18623
<CGS>                                             1726
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    12763
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3614
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 206
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    332
<INCOME-TAX>                                         4
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                328
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       328
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .025
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .017
        

</TABLE>
# C_2013141EN.01001501.xml

| 18.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Tivoli (Italy) lodged on 4 March 2013 — Francesco Fierro and Fabiana Marmorale v Edoardo Ronchi and Cosimo Scocozza

(Case C-106/13)

2013/C 141/26

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Tivoli

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Francesco Fierro and Fabiana Marmorale

Applicants:

Defendants: Edoardo Ronchi and Cosimo Scocozza

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Does the national legislation of the Italian Republic — in particular, Article 33 of Law No 1150/42, which allows the municipalities to regulate the urban development of land and/or building works on that land within the boundaries of each municipality in accordance with the general principles laid down in that Law, in Article 1 of Law No 10/77 and in various laws adopted by the individual regions, read in conjunction with Article 2 of Presidential Decree No. 380 of 6 June 2001‘consolidating the legislative and regulatory provisions on building’ and with lower-ranking local rules (general land use plans, implementing rules) and Article 46 of Presidential Decree No 380/2001, which renders sales transactions void in the event of alterations to immovable property being made without proper authorisation — constitute a disproportionate and unreasonable encroachment on the right to property, albeit regulated by law, contrary to Article 1 of Protocol 1 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights, read in conjunction with Article 6 [TEU] and Articles 17 and 52(3) of the [Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union]?

---
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 125

AN ACT

To designate the courthouse located at 501 I Street in Sacramento, California, as the ‘‘Robert T. Matsui United

States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 125 ES

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States courthouse located at 501 I Street

3 in Sacramento, California, is designated as the ‘‘Robert

4 T. Matsui United States Courthouse’’.

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

8 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

9 to be a reference to the Robert T. Matsui United States

10 Courthouse.

Passed the Senate February 17, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 125

AN ACT

To designate the courthouse located at 501 I Street

Matsui United States Courthouse’’.in Sacramento, California, as the ‘‘Robert T.