alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012355EN.01002801.xml

| 17.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/28

---

Action brought on 8 August 2012 — Harper Hygienics v OHIM — Clinique Laboratories (CLEANIC Kindii)

(Case T-364/12)

2012/C 355/60

Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Harper Hygienics S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: R. Rumpel, legal adviser)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Clinique Laboratories LLC (New York, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 May 2012 (Case R 1135/2001-2) refusing registration of ‘CLEANIC Kindii’ as a Community trade mark for goods in Classes 3, 5 and 16; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 May 2012 (Case R 1135/2001-2) refusing registration of ‘CLEANIC Kindii’ as a Community trade mark for goods in Classes 3, 5 and 16;

| — | amend the contested decision by registration of the trade mark for all the goods and services applied for; |
| --- | --- |

—

amend the contested decision by registration of the trade mark for all the goods and services applied for;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Harper Hygienics

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: figurative trade mark containing the word element ‘CLEANIC Kindii’ for goods in Classes 3, 5 and 16

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Clinique Laboratories LLC

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade marks No 54 429 for goods in Classes 3, 14, 25 and 42 and No 2 294 429 for goods in Classes 35 and 42, and national (Polish) mark No 51 732 for goods in Classes 3 and 5

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: opposition upheld

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (1) as regards establishment of the similarity of the trade marks and of the likelihood of confusion on the part of consumers, and infringement of Article 8(5) of that regulation

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
Exhibit 31.2

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Stephen B. Waters,certify that:

1.    I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Real Estate Associates LimitedVII;

2.    Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.    Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.    Theregistrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for the registrant andhave: 

 

(a)   Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)   Designedsuch internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d)   Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.    Theregistrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)   Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
     I, Andrew P. Calerich, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005of American Oil & Gas, Inc.
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;
     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.   Date:May 19, 2005 /s/ Andrew P. Calerich Andrew P. Calerich
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #9 Ltd. (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Freddie M.
      KotekName:
            Freddie
      M. KotekTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            May
      14, 2009
#### Rickey HUGHES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-810.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 21, 1978.

Rehearing Denied March 31, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Kurt Marmar, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Linda Collins Hertz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY and HUBBART, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

HENDRY, Judge.

Appellant/defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for robbery and unlawful possession of a firearm during a criminal offense.

While appellant has raised three points on appeal, the only meritorious contention is as follows:

> “Whether the trial court erred in restricting defense counsel in his cross-examination of the State’s key witness, thereby depriving appellant of his sixth and fourteenth amendment rights under the United States Constitution in addition to his rights under article I, section 16, of the Florida Constitution.”

We hold that the court did so err, and reverse appellant’s conviction and sentence, and remand the cause for a new trial.

*Sub judice,*the state’s chief witness, the victim of the robbery, had to be both arrested and jailed in order to secure his attendance as a witness. Defense counsel’s efforts to cross-examine the witness concerning his reluctance to testify was denied by the trial judge.

The Florida courts have long held that for the purpose of discrediting a witness, a wide range of cross-examination is permitted in the area of the witness’ motives, interest, and/or animus, as they relate to the cause or the parties. *Nelson v. State,*99 Fla. 1032, 128 So. 1 (1930); *Kirkland v. State,*185 So.2d 5 (Fla.2d DCA 1966). In disallowing inquiry into the area of the witness’ hesitancy to testify, it is our opinion that the trial judge abused his discretion and arguably deprived the jury of influential information. *McDuffie v. State,*341 So.2d 840 (Fla.2d DCA 1977); *Stradtman v. State,*334 So.2d 100 (Fla.3d DCA 1976).

Accordingly, appellant’s conviction and sentence are reversed and remanded for new trial.

Reversed and remanded.
Exhibit 32.2

# Written Statement of
the Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officerof The Middleton Doll
CompanyPursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, the undersigned Vice
President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer of The Middleton Doll Company (the
Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report of
Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 18, 2005

| | /s/ Susan J. Hauke        
| | --------------------------
| | Susan J. Hauke            
| | Vice President Finance and
| | Chief Financial Officer
No. 00-5532.

#### Felipe Germosa *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2328 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2328

  To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on 4-methoxy-2-
                          methyldiphenylamine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 23, 2012

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on 4-methoxy-2-
                          methyldiphenylamine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4-METHOXY-2-METHYLDIPHENYLAMINE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.35 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 4-methoxy-2-
methyldiphenylamine) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``1.1%'' in the column 1 general rate of 
        duty column and inserting ``Free''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

#  Busch visits DLA Energy Middle East

By By Irene SmithDLA Energy

                Bahrain  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Isa Air Basefuel supportfuel facilitiesmiddle east
CZlattg:ress nf tlle Utzitrit *tatta 

^`^nI3l1irrgt,alt, D(C "10515 

January 24, 2014 

The 14onorable Gina McCartliy 

Adrninistrator 

U.S. Rnvironmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Wasliington, DC 20460 

Dear Administrator McCailhy, 

We write to express our concern over the EPA's proposed reductions in the 2014 rernewable volume 

obligations (RVOs) undei• the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). T'he RFS has been a success story for 

American energy independence and the development of sustainable riu •al economies in our ltome state of 

lilinois ancl across the country. As such, we believe it is vital for EPA to get this policy right and allow 

the RFS to continue to support domestic energy production and jobs. 

Since Congi•ess established tiie ccu-rent RFS standards in 2007, the policy has contributed to impressive 

and greatly needed job creation in renewable ernergy. Specitically, in 2012, tlie ethanol industry 

supported 87,000 jobs directly and 295,000 jobs indii •ectly. These jobs provide good wages that support 

families act•oss America, many of them in rural comniunities that might otherwise liave limited 

opportunities for economic growth. Furthei •inore, the RFS has given certaiiity to American farmers, who 

are consistently the most productive in the world, in a business that is often dependent on u n controllable 

factors. 

Apart fi•orn the job creation and domestic economic growth we've seen since implementation of the RFS, 

etltanol arld biolilels are a vital component of the all-of=the-above energy strategy that Arnerica needs in 

order to acliieve energy independence. Since the RFS was implernented, oil imports have droppecl froin 

60% of U.S. consiunption to 40%.1'lie ethanol industry continues to grow, and the development of new 

technologies and the ability to use a new gerneration of feedstocks to produce inore advanced fuels 

provides enormoius potential for fiu-khet • decreasing ou►• dependence on foreign sources of energy. 

The RFS and tl7e growth of the ethanol industry over the past several years has been a great success stoj'y 

utitizing the productivity of our farmers, putting Americans back to work, and moving us toward energy 

independence. A forwa►•d-looking energy sti-ategy is necessary to continue the progress that has been 

made; as sucli, we strongly urge to you revise the proposed reduction in RVOs. We believe that there are 

many ways fiorward, and we lool: forwat •d to working with you on policies that niect our energy needs 

and contilruc to support Azncrican job creation and domestic energy production. Tliank you for yoLu• 

consideration, and we await your response. 

Respectfully, 

Adain Kinzingcr Aaron Schock 

Member of Congress Meinber of Congress 

^Yr

F'[9Rdi'Ga GN q eGYCL.eD PAPiifi
----

| **PEOPLES-SIDNEY                FINANCIAL CORPORATION**                 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                    |   |   |
| Subsidiary                                                              | State                ofIncorporation | Percentage                ofsecurities                owned |
|                                                                    |   |   |
| Peoples                Federal Savings & Loan Association of Sidney | Federal | 100% |

----
From: Jordan, Ronald

Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 7:42 AM

To: Aldridge, Elizabeth

Cc: dbhill@southernco.com; Hall, Jessica; Alicea, Jezebele; Flanders, Phillip

Subject: Questions regarding UWAG comments on Steam Electric ELGs

Good morning Liz,

Upon reviewing the comments UWAG submitted on the proposed effluent guidelines for the steam

electric power generating point source category, we’ve concluded that additional information is needed

to help us evaluate your comments with respect to fly ash and bottom ash. Please see the attached

letter for details.

I hope all is well and you’ve been able to take some time off to enjoy the holidays.

Regards,

Ron

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

Ron Jordan

USEPA Office of Water

Engineering and Analysis D vcivision

(202) 566

‐ 1003



### Attached:

UWAG questions_Dec 30 2013.pdf