alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT31.2**

**Certification**

I, Richard G. Wasielewski, certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of Nortech Systems, Inc. andSubsidiary;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)                Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)               Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport on such evaluation; and

a)                Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)                All significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)               Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: March 9, 2006 | By:    | /s/ RICHARD G.  WASIELEWSKI |
|--------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
|                     |   | Richard G. Wasielewski      |
|                     |   | Chief Financial Officer     |

 

53

----
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADPOTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lawrence Financial Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report), I,
Jack Blair, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      1. The report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                 /s/ Jack Blair
                    ----------------------------------------
                             Chief Executive Officer
                                   Jack Blair
                                 August 13, 2003


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        25
FAA Home
Airports
Resources
Series 150 Advisory Circulars (ACs) for Airport Projects

# AC 65-12A - [Large AC] Airframe and Powerplant Mechanics Powerplant Handbook (Cancelled)

- ShareShare
- 

- Facebook					Share on Facebook
- Twitter					Tweet on Twitter

## Document Information

- Number
- 65-12A
- Title
- [Large AC] Airframe and Powerplant Mechanics Powerplant Handbook
- Date cancelled
- 2015-05-21
- Cancellation notes
- AFS Cancellation Memo Richard Mathews
- Date issued
- 1976-01-01
- Office of Primary Responsibility
- AFS-630
- Description
-  	Designed to familiarize student mechanics with the construction, theory of operation, and maintenance of aircraft powerplants. SN 050-007-00373-1 
- Content
-    -  AFS Cancellation Memo AC 65-12A  (PDF) 
  -  AC 65-12A  (PDF) 

## View All

      - Current Series 150 ACs
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs
      - Draft Series 150 ACs
      - Advisory Circulars

## Export All

      - Current Series 150 ACs  (CSV)
      - Cancelled Series 150 ACs  (CSV)

## Top Requests

      - AC 150/5300-13B, Airport Design
      - AC 150/5320-6G, Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation
      - AC 150/5370-10H, Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports
      - AC 150/5340-1M, Standards for Airport Markings
      - AC 150/5340-30J, Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual Aids
      - AC 150/5390-2C, Heliport Design
#### Commonwealth *v.*Keenan, Appellant.

*Bond*— Trespass—Capias—Confession *of judgment.*

Where a bond given to the commonwealth in an aotion of trespass commenced by capias ad respondendum is in the form prescribed by the statute, the mere voluntary addition of a confession of judgment with a waiver of exemption, stay of execution and inquisition, will not invalidate the-bond nor will such provisions be treated as nullities.

Argued April 12, 1910.

May 16, 1910:

Appeal, No. 108, Jan. T., 1910, by defendants, from order of C. P. Luzerne Co., March T., 1909, No. 117, discharging rule to strike off judgment in case of Commonwealth to use of- Fritz Holznagel v. W. J. Keenan et al.

Before Fell, C. J., Brown, Mestrezat, Potter and Elkin, JJ.

Affirmed.

Rule to strike off judgment.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.

*Error assigned*was order discharging rule to strike off judgment.

*S. S. Herring,*with him *John T. Lenahan,*for appellants.

*Thomas D. Shea,*with him *James K. Gearhart,*for appellee.

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from an order discharging a rule to strike off a judgment entered by confession, on a bond to the commonwealth given in an action of trespass commenced by a capias ad respondendum. The condition of the bond was that prescribed by the act of assembly, but in addition there was a confession of judgment with a waiver of exemption, stay of execution and inquisition. The contention of the defendants is that this addition *277invalidated the bond or at least should be treated as surplusage and a nullity and that the judgment entered is void.

A person under arrest on a capias is entitled to his discharge upon complying with the statute. The giving of a bond is compulsory and no condition can be exacted in excess of the requirement of the statute. None was exacted in this case. The bond was regular and in proper form and its condition was in exact compliance with the act of assembly. The confession of judgment and the accompanying waivers were voluntarily given. They added nothing to the obligation of the bond but merely facilitated its enforcement. In speaking of a replevin bond that contained a warrant of attorney to confess judgment, it was said in the opinion in Clark v. Morss, 142 Pa. 311, “There is no statute or rule of public policy which prohibits a sheriff from accepting such a bond, if it is voluntarily tendered to him by the plaintiff in the replevin. The warrant to confess judgment affects the remedy on the bond, but the liability of the obligors is measured by its lawful conditions.”

The order is affirmed at the cost of the appellant.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 43301]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21375]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-174, RM-9146]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Hamilton, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by North 
Texas Broadcasting requesting the allotment of Channel 285C3 to 
Hamilton, Texas. Channel 285C3 can be allotted to Hamilton in 
compliance with the Commission's minimum distance separation 
requirements with a site restriction 13.4 kilometers (8.3 miles) south. 
The coordinates for Channel 285C3 at Hamilton are 31-49-25 NL and 98-
06-49 WL.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before September 29, 1997, and 
reply comments on or before October 14, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: William 
D. Silva, 5335 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W., Suite 400, Washington, D.C. 
20015-2003 (Counsel for petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-174, adopted July 30, 
1997, and released August 8, 1997. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857-
3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-21375 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with theAnnual Report of China Recycling Energy Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Xinyu Peng, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company and Secretary, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: September
      28, 2009
              
              /s/
      Xinyu PengXinyu
      PengChief
      Financial Officer and
Secretary
Before the First Division,

April 30, 1942

No. 47133.

#### Protest 36757-K/89500 of W. Braun Co. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

A bottle and unground stopper were received in evidence as exhibit 1. Appearing on the bottle were the words “Recher’s Muscatel.” The only witness in the ease, the general manager of the importing concern, testified, among other things, that the bottles filled with wine had been imported specifically for D. Recher & Co. as containers “for their port, sherry, and muscatel wines”; and that all of the bottles were of the same character and appearance excepting the descriptive lettering, some having the lettering “Recher’s Port” and “Recher’s Sherry.” He further testified that while all bottles could be used on the table, generally a bottle that is marked in a commercial manner such as this one is hardly suitable for that purpose. The court was of the opinion that the loose stopper in the instant ease does not render the bottle here involved unsuitable for holding wine, as testified to by the witness, whatever may be said of the unsuitability for transportation purposes. It was held that the uncon-tradicted testimony of this witness as to the use of the merchandise was sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s classification. It was therefore found that the bottles in question were not for table service but for the holding of wine. The claim at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 217 was therefore sustained. *DeBoer*v. *United States*(T. D. 44301) cited.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Hudson Valley Holding Corp. (the
Company) for the year ending December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Stephen R. Brown, Senior
Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and result of operations of the Company.



| |                                 
| | --------------------------------
| | /s/ STEPHEN R. BROWN            
| |                                 
| | Stephen R. Brown                
| | Senior Executive Vice President,
| | Chief Operating Officer,        
| | Chief Financial Officer         

Dated: March 12, 2004
No. 48261.

#### Protest 85049-K of Aeolian Shipping Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The merchandise was exported from Yugoslavia and was entered as “Kefalotyri cheese.” The uncontradicted evidence showed that it is in fact Romano type cheese in original loaves, in brine. So much of the shipment as remained in warehouse on November 15, 1941 was held dutiable at 5 cents per pound, but not less than 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 710, as modified by said trade agreement. The protest was overruled as to all other merchandise.
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications NOAA-NMFS-F/NWC-201: Status Review for Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon 
Figure 2. Historical spawning habitat for spring-, summer-, and fall-run chinook salmon in the Snake River Basin. 

Use your browser's BACK button to return to the text.

Table of Contents
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1340 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1340

 To amend the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act to extend the 
date after which surplus funds in the wildlife restoration fund become 
                      available for apportionment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 30, 2005

  Mr. Inhofe (for himself and Mr. Jeffords) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act to extend the 
date after which surplus funds in the wildlife restoration fund become 
                      available for apportionment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF SURPLUS FUNDS IN WILDLIFE RESTORATION FUND.

    Section 3(b)(2)(C) of the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration 
Act (16 U.S.C. 669b(b)(2)(C) is amended by striking ``2006'' and 
inserting ``2016''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 99-7836.

#### Mendoza *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7803

DAVID BOYD KERR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JANET SALYER; WILLIAM HILL; GEORGE DEEDS;

RICHARD YOUNG,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District

Judge. (CA-96-962-R)

Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 4, 1997

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Boyd Kerr, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kerr

v. Salyer, No. CA-96-962-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 7, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 99-7776.

#### Winsett *v.*West, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
009611

Consumer Product Safety Alert

FROM THE U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20207

Infants Can Choke On Plastic Decals

F rom Baby Wa l k e rs and Other Pro d u c t s

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

(CPSC) knows of incidents in which young children

peeled off and choked on plastic labels and decals

from baby walkers. The CPSC also has reports of

oung children choking on plastic labels and decals

from other products. Fortunately none of these incidents resulted in deaths but the potential exists for a

agedy to occur.

Parents and other child care providers are strong]

urged to pull off and throw away all plastic labels and

decals from baby walkers and other juvenile products

to prevent choking. However, do not remove permanent paper warning labels. Parents also should throw

away loose plastic labels and decals from other products to which the children may have access.

Infants can choke on plastic labels peeled off baby

walkers and other products.

Pull off and throw away plastic labels and decals.

Infants can choke on plastic labels

peeled off baby walkers and other

products.

Pull off and throw away plastic labels

and decals.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 43294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21374]



[[Page 43294]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-110; RM-9045]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Mansura, LA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Mark A. Zweig, allots 
Channel 240A to Mansura, Louisiana, as the community's first local 
aural transmission service. See 62 FR 17772, April 11, 1997. Channel 
240A can be allotted to Mansura in compliance with the Commission's 
minimum distance separation requirements without the imposition of a 
site restriction. The coordinates for Channel 240A at Mansura are 31-
03-36 NL and 92-03-00 WL. With this action, this proceeding is 
terminated.

DATES: Effective September 22, 1997. The window period for filing 
applications for Channel 240A at Mansura will open on September 22, 
1997, and close on October 23, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 97-110, adopted July 30, 1997, and 
released August 8, 1997. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Louisiana, 
is amended by adding Mansura, Channel 240A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-21374 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P