alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013063EN.01001501.xml

| 2.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/15

---

Action brought on 7 January 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia

(Case C-9/13)

2013/C 63/25

Language of the case: Slovene

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by D. Kukovec, P. Hetsch and O. Beynet, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Slovenia

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 2009/73/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 2003/55/EC, (2) or in any case by failing to notify the Commission of such measures, the Republic of Slovenia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 54(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 2009/73/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 2003/55/EC, (2) or in any case by failing to notify the Commission of such measures, the Republic of Slovenia has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 54(1) of that directive;

1

2

| — | order the Republic of Slovenia, pursuant to Article 260(3) TFEU, to make a penalty payment of EUR 10 287,36 a day, from the day on which judgment shall be given in these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Slovenia, pursuant to Article 260(3) TFEU, to make a penalty payment of EUR 10 287,36 a day, from the day on which judgment shall be given in these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period allowed for transposition of the directive expired on 3 March 2011.

---

(1)  OJ 2009 L 211, p. 94.

1

(2)  OJ 2003 L 176, p. 57.

2

---
Exhibit 99.1 - Certification of Chief Executive Officer


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Benchmark Technology Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").
I, John Dean Harper, Chief Executive Officer (or Chief Financial Officer) of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.


/s/ John Dean Harper
----------------------------
    John Dean Harper
    Chief Executive Officer


Date  September 11, 2002
      ------------------


<PAGE>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 159 (Monday, August 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21754]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-686-000]

Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Request 
Under Blanket Authorization

August 12, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 7, 1997, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston), 200 North Third Street, Suite 300, 
Bismarck, ND 58501, filed in Docket No. CP97-686-000 a request pursuant 
to Sections 157.205 and 157.216(b) of the Commission's Regulations 
under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 157.216) for approval to 
abandon 4,280 feet of four-inch lateral pipeline located in Richland 
County, MT, under Wiliston's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. 
CP82-487-000 et al., pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act 
(NGA), all as more fully set forth in the request which is on file with 
the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Williston asserts that the pipeline proposed to be abandoned herein 
was originally constructed in 1978 to allow the receipt of gas from a 
supplier at the Petrolane-Perry Gas Processing Company Plant (Plant) 
and/or to deliver natural gas to the supplier to be used as field fuel. 
Williston further asserts that the Plant was shut down in the early 
1980's and that Williston has not received natural gas from the Plant 
since 1983 or made deliveries of natural gas through this pipeline 
since 1993. Williston thus proposes to purge this pipeline and abandon 
it in place.
    Any person or the Commission's Staff may, within 45 days of the 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214), a motion to intervene and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activities shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21754 Filed 8-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
Carl Daly 

## COLORADO Department ofPublic Health & 

### Environment Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado

Air Program Director U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129
17 February 2016
Dear Mr. Daly, Per a letter to you dated 31 March 2015, the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Air Pollution Control Division (APCD), acknowledged that 40 CFR Part 58.1 O(a)(5)(iv) required a "second near-road N02 monitor in any CBSA with a population of 2, 500,000 or more persons, or a second monitor i n any CBSA with a population of 500,000 or more persons that has one or more roadway segments with 250,000 or greater AADT counts" by January 1, 2015. This second site was addressed in Colorado's 2014 Annual Network Plan submitted to EPA on 1 July 2014, as required by CFR, and was approved by EPA on 13 March 2015. In the letter, the APCD committed to having this second near-road site i n Denver, located at 1-25 and 49th Avenue, to be operational by 31 December 2015. This letter is to provide confirmation that the site officially became operational on 1 October 2015. The APCD is happy that this issue has been resolved ahead of the commitment date and can be removed from any pending items lists. If you have any questions, please contact me at (303) 692-3114 or at william.allison@state
.co. us 

# z:ly, Willialf ¥
Director, Air Pollution Control Division

cc. Abby Fulton, EPA (email) Monica Morales, EPA (email) Richard Payton , EPA (email) Chris Colclasure, APCD (email) Gordon Pierce, APCD (email)

4300 Cherry Creek Drive S. , Denver, CO 80246-1530 P 303-692-2000 www.colorado.gov/cdphe John W. Hickenlooper, Governor 

### I Larry Wolk, MD, MSPH, Executive Director and Chief Medical Office1·
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42973]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21073]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-432-000]


Southern Natural Gas Company; Notice of GSR Revised Tariff Sheets

August 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 31, 1997, Southern Natural Gas Company 
(Southern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Seventh 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets with the proposed 
effective date of August 1, 1997:

Tariff Sheets Applicable to Contesting Parties:
Twenty Ninth Revised Sheets No. 14
Fiftieth Revised Sheet No. 15
Twenty Ninth Revised Sheet No. 16
Fiftieth Revised Sheet No. 17
Thirty Third Revised Sheet No. 29

    Southern states that it submits the revised tariff sheets to its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Seventh Revised Volume No. 1, to reflect a change in 
its FT/FT-NN GSR Surcharge, due to a decrease in GSR billing units 
effective August 1, 1997.
    Southern states that copies of the filing were served upon all 
parties listed on the official service list compiled by the Secretary 
in these proceedings.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests must be 
filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of Southern's 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21073 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 99-7888.

#### Diaz, aka Luz Lucio de la Cruz *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EPA Public Webinar on Potential Reinterpretation of Clean Water Act TAS

September 10, 2015 2:00 – 4:00 p.m. EDT

Webinar Summary

Presenters: Tom Gardner, EPA Office of Science and Technology

Tod Siegal, EPA Office of General Counsel

Moderator: Tom Gardner, EPA Office of Science and Technology

Participants: See last page – about 30 participants attended

PRESENTATION SUMMARY 

The webinar began with introductions and instructions for participants, followed by a

presentation by Mr. Gardner and Mr. Siegal based on briefing slides available in the docket for 

the rulemaking at www.regulations.gov. Search for Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0461. 

The webinar continued with an opportunity for questions and comments from participants. 

Questions were submitted by participants either in writing through the chat window to the EPA 

moderator, Mr. Gardner, or over the phone after the phone lines were opened.

The following is a list of questions received from participants during the webinar. For each of the

questions, the EPA presenters provided responses that were consistent with the presentation

materials and other information available at http://www.epa.gov/wqs-tech/revised-interpretationclean-water-act-tribal-provision. Views and comments provided were acknowledged.

QUESTIONS

 Would this also apply to the TAS for Clean Air Act for Tribes?

 Will comments from participants in this webinar be included?

 How and what would a tribe need to do to apply for TAS under this new interpretation?

 What if our Tribe has already submitted TAS application and went through Public 

Comment Period and we are just awaiting approval from Region 9?

 Would the delegation of CWA authority to set WQS extend to other lands over which the 

Federal Government has retained legislative jurisdiction, so that the Federal Government 

and not the adjoining State would set the WQS?
WEBINAR ATTENDEES

First Name Last Name Affiliation

Lori Blair The Boeing Company

Peter Brumm

Lorraine Cope USCG (CTR-E3)

Steve Covell USDA

Crystal Davis Sac and Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa

Thomas Dosch Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

Sara Drescher Forest County Potawatomi Community

Ronnie Hawks Jennings, Haug & Cunningham

Jason Hempsmyer Mechoopda Indian Tribe

Lisa Hopinkah San Felipe Pueblo

Gene Ka-hee Pueblo de Cochiti DNRC Department

Gina Leverette Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community

Aaron Loomis

Jeffrey Lynch Cortina Indian Rancheria

Rebecca McMahon Yurok Tribe

Kimberly Miller Morongo Band of Mission Indians

Steven Moore Native American Rights Fund

Meghann Niesen Office of Science and Technology

Kate Pinkerton

Jane Ratcliff

Crystal Robinson

Suzanne Schaeffer Dentons US LLP

Jane Steadman Kanji & Katzen PLLC

Mike Stover Region 1

Candon Tanaka Shoshone-Bannock Tribes

Doug Thompson Law Office of Douglas P. Thompson, PLLC

Mark Valencia San Manuel Band of Mission Indians

Heather Westra Prairie Island Indian Community

Jennifer Williams Institute for Tribal Environmental Professionals

Joy Yoshioka Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7578

VERNARD JEROME MATHIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

LEROY CARTLEDGE, Warden McCormick Correctional Institution,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Aiken. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge. 

(1:11-cv-02383-RMG)

Submitted: December 6, 2012 Decided: December 12, 2012

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeremy A. Thompson, LAW OFFICE OF JEREMY A. THOMPSON, LLC, 

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Donald John Zelenka, 

Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Alphonso Simon, Jr., 

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Vernard Jerome Mathis seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Mathis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Bradley J. DodsonName:
    
    Bradley J. DodsonDate:
    
    November 4, 2009
REGINALD MAURICE 

DAWSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4191

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 2, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Adrian G. Soud, Judge.

Reginald Maurice Dawson, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., VAN NORTWICK, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Aerospace Energy brings awareness to breast cancer

By Jonathan StackDLA Energy Public Affairs

                SAN ANTONIO  –              Aerospace Energy

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA EnergyAerosapce Energybreast cancer awarenessBreast Cancer Awareness Month
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA senior leaders impressed with Troop Support's confidence, efficiency

By Mikia MuhammadDLA Troop Support Public Affairs

                PHILADELPHIA  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

warfighter supportFlag RoomDLA Troop Support
No. 00-6330.

#### Travis *v.*Alabama.

Sup. Ct. Ala. . Certiorari denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA civilian killed in Afghanistan left legacy of service, friendship

By Beth ReeceDLA Public Affairs

                Fort Belvoir, Virginia  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Navy reservistAfghanistanfirst DLA employee killedJim Liberkodisposal remediation teamStephen Byus