alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Charles Happel, Inc. (Nozaki Bros. Inc.) *v.*United States

No. 6015.

Invoices dated Yokohama, Japan, April 28, 1936, etc.

Certified May 4, 1936, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 29, 1936, etc.

Entry No. 847410, etc.

(Decided May 16, 1944)

*Strauss & Hedges (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Cole, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been limited, by written stipulation filed on May 9, 1944, to canned clams packed 5 ounces to the tin, and represented by the invoice items marked A and initialed FHL, the parties agreeing that said merchandise is “the same as the clams packed 5 ounces to the can involved in *United States*v. *Mutual Supply Co. et al.,*Reap. Dec. 5950,” and that the record therein may be incorporated here.

In the cited case, appraisement was made on the basis of American selling price, section 402 (g) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 *468ed. § 1402 (g)), pursuant to the provisions of a Presidential proclamation, T. D. 47031, which decreed such basis for appraisement of “clams other than razor clams” to equalize the differences in cost of production between foreign products and like or similar ones of domestic origin.

It is agreed between the parties that the market conditions, relating to the instant merchandise, were the same, at the time of its exportation, as those established in the incorporated case, and that the market price under those conditions for the 5-ounce clams included in. Reappraisements 114050-A, 115314-A, 115315-A, and 117054-A was 90 cents per dozen cans, less *1%*per centum cash discount, and for such merchandise involved in the remaining appeals under consideration was $1 per dozen cans less *1%*per centum cash discount.

On the stipulated facts, I hold American selling price as defined in section 402 (g), *supra,*to be the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise referred to, and that such statutory values are those hereinabove set forth.

The appeals having been abandoned as to all other merchandise, they are dismissed so far as they relate thereto.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's 
previously filed Registration Statement File Numbers 333-33077, 33-83902, 
333-02685, 333-36121, 333-33073, 33-51202, 33-83904, 33-69870, 33-41591, 
33-4468, 33-41592, 333-33075, 333-64541 and 33-41593.


                                          /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                          ------------------------------------
                                              Arthur Andersen LLP


New York, New York 
March 18, 1999
Motion GRANTED and Order filed April 18 , 2019

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00267

- CV

____________ IN RE KOSMOS ENERGY SAO TOME AND PRINCIP E , Relator

O RIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 157th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017

- 71987



### ORDER

On April 9 , 2019, relator Kosmos Energy Sao Tome and Principe, filed a n unopposed motion, asking this court for leave to withdraw its original mandamus record and replace it with the amended mandamus record filed with the motion as
Exhibit A

. The original mandamus record contains no redactions and the amended
mandamus record contains documents with redactions.We grant such motion and ORDER the original mandamus record to be withdrawn and replaced with the amended mandamus record.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Wise and Zimmerer. (Chief Justice Frost would deny the motion because the amended mandamus reco rd contains documents with redactions ; relator has not shown that the documents reviewed by the trial court were similarly redacted and in considering the request for mandamus relief, this court must review the same evidence the trial court considered

. ).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43518-43519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21432]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Board of Visitors Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense Acquisition University.

ACTION: Board of Visitors Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The next meeting of the Defense Acquisition University (DAU) 
Board of Visitors (BoV) will be held at the Defense Systems Management 
College (DSMC), 9000 Belvoir Road, Building 184, Fort Belvoir, Virginia 
on Wednesday, September 10, 1997 from 0830 until 1600. The purpose of 
this meeting is to report back to the BoV on continuing items of 
interest and discuss the DAU distance learning initiatives. The agenda 
will include continuing discussions concerning acquisition research, 
development of the continuing acquisition education policy, and the 
development of the DAU distance learning program plan and schedule.
    The meeting is open to the public; however, because of space 
limitations, allocation of seating will be made on a first-come, first 
served basis. Persons desiring to attend the meeting should call Mrs. 
Joyce Reniere at (703) 805-5134.


[[Page 43519]]


    Dated: August 8, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate, OSD Federal Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-21432 Filed 8-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Yvonne SAULSBERRY.

No. 61806.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 7, 1978.

In re: Yvonne Saulsberry applying for Supervisory Writs. Terrebonne Parish.

Denied.
Exhibit 23.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Immunomedics, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-90338) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-114810, 333-53224, 33-56844, 33-43595 and
33-16260) on Form S-8 of Immunomedics, Inc. of our report dated August 9, 2002,
with respect to the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive
income (loss), changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year
ended June 30, 2002, and the related consolidated financial statement schedule,
which report appears in the June 30, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of
Immunomedics, Inc.


                                  /s/ KPMG LLP

Princeton, New Jersey
September 9, 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

NICHOLAS MICHAEL TATE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 338 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of October, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
October 21, 1996

No. D-1702.

#### In re Disbarment of Scott.

Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 518 U. S. 1038.]
##### 



EXHIBIT 10

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Instrumentarium Corporation (the
company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), the undersigned hereby
certify that to the best of our knowledge:

1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.

|                   |  |                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | ----------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: 26 June 2003 |  | /S/ Olli Riikkala
|                   |  |                  
|                   |  | Name:             |  | Olli Riikkala          
|                   |  | Title:            |  | President and          
|                   |  |                   |  | Chief Executive Officer

|                   |  |                      |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: 26 June 2003 |  | /S/ Matti Salmivuori
|                   |  |                     
|                   |  | Name:                |  | Matti Salmivuori       
|                   |  | Title:               |  | Chief Financial Officer

* * *

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Instrumentarium Corporation and will be retained by Instrumentarium
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

* * *

In accordance with the interim guidance for Section 906 certification issued by
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2003 in
Release No. 33-8212, this certification will not be deemed filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to
the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of
1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that
Instrumentarium Corporation specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### Billy Ray BLACK v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50206.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 15, 1978.

Richard E. Stratton, III, Brookhaven, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Robert D. Findley, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and BROOM and BOWLING, JJ.

Affirmed.

INZER and SMITH, P. JJ., and ROBERTSON, SUGG, WALKER and LEE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

                                  Certification
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
        (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
                               United States Code)

      Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Immunomedics. Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

      The annual report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 (the "Form
10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

      Dated: September 9, 2004


      /s /GERARD G. GORMAN
      --------------------------------------------------
      Gerard G. Gorman
      Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Pingchuan
Pharmaceutical, Inc. (the "Company") certify that:

     1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period
ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

May 12, 2006                           /s/ Yao Qitai
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Yao Qitai (Chief Executive Officer)

May 12, 2006                           /s/ Zhang Chunman
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Zhang Chunman (Chief Financial
                                        Officer)
ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 18-0335

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DAVID MICHAEL YOUMANS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Appellant David Michael Youmans was granted an extension of time to file and

serve his opening brief on or before July 2, 2020. This Court ordered that no further

extensions would be granted. The opening brief is now overdue.

THEREF ORE,

IT IS ORDERED that Appellant shall prepare, file and serve the opening brief on

appeal no later than July 30, 2020. Failure to file the brief within that time will result in

dismissal of this appeal with prejudice and without further notice.

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to all parties of record.

DATED this tO Illy of July, 2020.

FILED

JUL 1 0 2020

Bovvern Greenwoou

Clerk of Supreme Court

Stote nf Mo,tana

For the Court,

v

Chief Justice

07/10/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0335
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATION     I, Patrick D. O’Brien, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,2005 of American Oil & Gas, Inc.     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.      Date: November 15, 2005  /s/ Patrick D. O’Brien     Patrick D. O’Brien
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 93 (Tuesday, May 15, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27282-27283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9283]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Southwestern Region, Arizona, New Mexico, West Texas and 
Oklahoma: Proposed Land and Resource Management Plan Amendment for the 
Valle Vidal, Carson National Forest, Taos and Colfax Counties, NM; 
Additional Filings

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service published a Notice of Intent (70 FR 
34441-34442, June 14, 2005) to prepare an environmental impact 
statement for a proposed forest plan amendment to incorporate standards 
and guidelines for the management of the Valle Vidal Unit of the Questa 
Ranger District, Carson National Forest.

CORRECTED DATES: The Notice of Intent (NOI) states the draft 
environmental

[[Page 27283]]

impact statement (DEIS) is expected to be available for public review 
sometime in February or March 2006. This Notice corrects the estimated 
filing date of the DEIS from spring 2006 to summer 2007. At that time, 
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will publish a Notice of 
Availability (NOA) of the DEIS in the Federal Register.
    Additionally, the 2005 NOI states the comment period would be for 
90 days. This Notice changes the length of the comment period to 60 
days from the date the NOA is published in the Federal Register.
    Completion date for the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) 
is subsequently corrected to reflect these changes. The NOI states the 
FEIS would be completed in September 2006. This Notice corrects the 
estimated completion date of the FEIS from September 2006 to winter 
2007. When completed, EPA will publish a NOA of the FEIS in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Kuykendall, Forest 
Environmental Coordinator, Carson National Forest, at (505) 758-6212.

    Dated: May 8, 2007.
Martin D. Chavez, Jr.,
Forest Supervisor, Carson National Forest.
[FR Doc. E7-9283 Filed 5-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
VI 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1233 

For the relief of Diana Gecaj Engstrom. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 14, 2005 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself and Mr. OBAMA) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Diana Gecaj Engstrom. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR DIANA 

4 GECAJ ENGSTROM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Diana Gecaj Engstrom shall be eligible for issuance 

8 of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that 

9 of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 

10 upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant 

11 visa under section 204 of that Act or for adjustment of 

12 status to lawful permanent resident. 
2 

•S 1233 IS

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Diana Gecaj 

2 Engstrom enters the United States before the filing dead3 line specified in subsection (c), Diana Gecaj Engstrom 

4 shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully 

5 and shall be eligible for adjustment of status under section 

6 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 

7 of enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Diana Gecaj Engstrom, the Secretary of State 

16 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 

17 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 

18 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of birth of Diana Gecaj Engstrom under section 

20 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if appli21 cable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 

22 available to natives of the country of birth of Diana Gecaj 

23 Engstrom under section 202(e) of that Act. 

Æ
!(4

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000

Feet /

Apalachia Reservoir

Land Management Plan

Tile: B5

Jul 24, 2008

\\alismurphy\home\mprlm\projects\landplan\Maps\Apalachia_land_plan\Apalachia_land_plan_for_Web.mxd
No. 46552.

#### Protest 774795-G of Pennsylvania Macaroni Co. (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Cline, J..

At the trial the protest was submitted without the introduction of testimony or other evidence in support of the claims made. There was nothing in the record to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action. The protest was therefore overruled.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 153 (Friday, August 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20947]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-159-008]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

August 4, 1997.
    Take notice on July 30, 1997, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, certain revised tariff sheets to 
which tariff sheets are listed on Attachment A attached to the filing. 
The proposed effective date for the tariff sheets is June 1, 1997.
    Transco states that the purpose of the instant filing is to comply 
with the Commission's order issued July 16, 1997 in the referenced 
docket (July 16 Order). The July 16 Order addressed Transco's 
submission of pro forma tariff sheets reflecting a form of trading 
partner agreement (TPA) and required Transco to file actual tariff 
sheets within fifteen days of the date of the order reflecting the form 
of TPA.
    Transco states that it is serving copies of the instant filing to 
customers, State Commissions and other interested parties.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sec. 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be filed 
as provided in Sec. 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20947 Filed 8-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Ex parte Delores DISMUKES.

SC 2609.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 17, 1977.

BLOODWORTH, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and JONES, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.