alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2172 

To remove the limit on the anticipated award price for contracts awarded 

under the procurement program for women-owned small business concerns, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2012 

Ms. SNOWE (for herself, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. BENNET, 

Mrs. SHAHEEN, Ms. MIKULSKI, and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small 

Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To remove the limit on the anticipated award price for contracts awarded under the procurement program for 

women-owned small business concerns, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fairness in Women5 Owned Small Business Contracting Act of 2012’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2172 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROCUREMENT PROGRAM FOR WOMEN-OWNED 

2 SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS. 

3 Section 8(m) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

4 637(m)) is amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (2)— 

6 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘who 

7 are economically disadvantaged’’; 

8 (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking 

9 ‘‘paragraph (3)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph 

10 (4)’’; 

11 (C) by striking subparagraph (D); and 

12 (D) by redesignating subparagraphs (E) 

13 and (F) as subparagraphs (D) and (E), respec14 tively; and 

15 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(7) SOLE SOURCE CONTRACTS.—A contracting 

17 officer may award a sole source contract under this 

18 subsection to a small business concern owned and 

19 controlled by women under the same conditions as a 

20 sole source contract may be awarded to a qualified 

21 HUBZone small business concern under section 

22 31(b)(2)(A).’’. 

23 SEC. 3. STUDY AND REPORT ON REPRESENTATION OF 

24 WOMEN. 

25 Section 29 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656) 

26 is amended by adding at the end the following: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2172 IS

1 ‘‘(o) STUDY AND REPORT ON REPRESENTATION OF

2 WOMEN.— 

3 ‘‘(1) STUDY.—The Administrator shall periodi4 cally conduct a study to identify any United States 

5 industry, as defined under the North American In6 dustry Classification System, in which women are 

7 underrepresented. 

8 ‘‘(2) REPORT.—Not later than 5 years after the 

9 date of enactment of this subsection, and every 5 

10 years thereafter, the Administrator shall submit to 

11 the Committee on Small Business and Entrepre12 neurship of the Senate and the Committee on Small 

13 Business of the House of Representatives a report 

14 on the results of each study under paragraph (1) 

15 conducted during the 5-year period ending on the 

16 date of the report.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Page
                Seventy





**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Statement
      of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.**§
**1350**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of
      Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period
      ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, as the chief financial
      officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                R. Alan MillerDate:
                March 22, 2007
            R.
                Alan Miller, Chief Financial
                Officer
No. 99-7931.

#### Nagy *v.*Goldstein et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 2 1 , 2023

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00601

- CV

K. S. M ., Appellant

V. S. H ., Appellee

On Appeal from the 312th District Court

Harris County, Texa s Trial Co urt Cause No. 2015

- 59700

M EMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appe al from a fina l order in a suit affect the parent

- child relationship, See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 109.002 judgment signed May 17, 2022

. Appellant K.S.M. filed a timely request for findings of fact and co nclusions of law on May 2 4, 2022

. Appellant ’ s notice of appeal was filed August 16, 2022.

When an appellant has filed a timely post

- judgment motion, the notice of

ap peal must be filed within 90 days after the date the judgment is signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a) ( 4)

. Appellant ’ s n otice of appeal was due August 1 5 , 2022.2

Appellant ’ s notice of appeal was not filed timely. A motion to extend time is necessarily impl ied when an appellant, acting in good faith, f iles a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Texas R ule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, but within
the 15

- day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion to extend time. See Verburgt v. Dorner , 95 9 S.W.2d 615, 617

– 18 (1997) (construing the

pr edecessor to Rule 26). Appellant ’ s notice of appeal was fi led within the 15

- day period provided by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3

. Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of ap peal. While an extension may be implied, appel lant is still obligated to come forward
with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd. , 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). O n February 7, 2023, appellant was o rdered to file a prope r motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal within ten (10) days of the date of
this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 26. 3; 10.5(b). Appellant was notified the appeal was subject to dism issal without further notice for want of juri sdiction if no proper
motion to extend time was filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3 (a)

. Appellant filed no response. W e d ismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Ch ris topher and Justices Jewell and Spain.
PROJCS["NAD_1983_HARN_StatePlane_Mississippi_East_FIPS_2301_Feet",GEOGCS["GCS_North_American_1983_HARN",DATUM["D_North_American_1983_HARN",SPHEROID["GRS_1980",6378137.0,298.257222101]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0.0],UNIT["Degree",0.0174532925199433]],PROJECTION["Transverse_Mercator"],PARAMETER["False_Easting",984250.0],PARAMETER["False_Northing",0.0],PARAMETER["Central_Meridian",-88.83333333333333],PARAMETER["Scale_Factor",0.99995],PARAMETER["Latitude_Of_Origin",29.5],UNIT["Foot_US",0.3048006096012192]]
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or 78o(d),                and, |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  September                10, 2007 | /s/                Donald W. Barney                                            |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                               | Donald                W. Barney                                                |
|                                               | President,                Treasurer and Chief Financial                Officer |
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA director visits personnel, tours Europe and Africa regional command 

By DLA Energy Public AffairsDLA Public Affairs

                Kaiserslautern, Germany  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

KaiserslauternGermanyCentral European Pipeline SystemBuschTerminalenergy
Exhibit 10.8(b)


Schedule of Secured Convertible Notes (new financings) issued by NCT Group, Inc.
            to Carole Salkind and Outstanding as of February 28, 2005



                                                                   Conversion
    Issue Date           Due Date              Principal              Price
  -------------         ---------        -----------------       ---------------
    09/02/04             03/02/05           $   400,000            $  0.0210
    09/14/04             03/14/05               400,000               0.0200
    10/01/04             04/01/05               400,000               0.0200
    10/15/04             04/15/05               425,000               0.0190
    11/08/04             05/08/05               425,000               0.0190
    11/23/04             05/23/05               400,000               0.0180
    12/02/04             06/02/05               400,000               0.0170
    12/17/04             06/17/05               400,000               0.0166
    12/31/04             06/30/05               400,000               0.0180
    01/26/05             07/26/05               400,000               0.0172
    02/09/05             08/09/05               400,000               0.0180
    02/16/05             08/16/05               400,000               0.0180

                                         -----------------
                                           $  4,850,000
                                         =================
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Hudson Valley Holding Corp. (the
Company) for the year ending December 31, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, James J. Landy,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and result of operations of the Company.



| |                                          
| | -----------------------------------------
| | /s/ JAMES J. LANDY                       
| |                                          
| | James J. Landy                           
| | President and Chief Executive
    Officer

Dated: March 15, 2007
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statement File Numbers 333-33077, 33-83902,
333-02685, 333-36121, 333-33073, 33-51202, 33-83904, 33-69870, 33-41591,
33-4468, 33-41592, 333-33075, 333-64541 and 33-41593.

                             /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                      ------------------------------------
                               Arthur Andersen LLP

New York, New York
March 28, 2000
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1123 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain microphones used in automotive 

interiors. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2005 

Mr. LEVIN (for himself and Mr. DEWINE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain microphones 

used in automotive interiors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MICROPHONES FOR USE IN AUTO4 MOTIVE INTERIORS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 
2 

•S 1123 IS 

‘‘ 9902.85.18 Microphones for use in automotive 

interiors having a typical frequency 

response of 250 Hz through 7 kHz 

(± at 1kHz), ESD immunity of 4kV 

(contact) and 8kV (air), which are 

capable of operation and storage in 

the temperature range of -40– 

+90°C and humidity of 0—95% 

(provided for in subheading 

8518.10.80.30) ................................. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2007 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

2 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by 

3 subsection (a) shall apply to goods entered, or with4 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

5 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

6 (2) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION.—Notwith7 standing section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or 

8 any other provision of law, and subject to paragraph 

9 (4), the entry, or withdrawal from warehouse for 

10 consumption, of a good described in heading 

11 9902.85.18 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

12 the United States (as added by subsection (a)) that 

13 was made— 

14 (A) on or after January 1, 2005; and 

15 (B) before the 15th day after the date of 

16 enactment of this Act, and 

17 to which duty-free treatment would have applied if 

18 the amendment made by this section had been in ef19 fect on the date of such entry, shall be liquidated or 

20 reliquidated as if such duty-free treatment applied, 

21 and the Secretary of the Treasury shall refund any 

22 duty paid with respect to such entry. 
3 

•S 1123 IS 

1 (3) ENTRY.—In this subsection, the term 

2 ‘‘entry’’ includes a withdrawal from warehouse for 

3 consumption. 

4 (4) REQUESTS.—Liquidation or reliquidation 

5 may be made under paragraph (2) with respect to 

6 an entry only if proper request therefor is filed with 

7 the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, with8 in 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 

9 Act, that contains sufficient information to enable 

10 the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection— 

11 (A) to locate the entry; or 

12 (B) to reconstruct the entry if it cannot be 

13 located. 

Æ
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 989-990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-210]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 11437-001 North Carolina]

Hydro Matrix Partnership, Ltd; Notice of Availability of Draft 
Environmental Assessment

December 31, 1996.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission's) 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 F.R. 47897), the Office 
of Hydropower Licensing has reviewed the application for license for 
the proposed Jordan Hydroelectric Project, located on the Haw River, 
Chatham County, North Carolina, and has prepared a Draft Environmental 
Assessment (DEA) for the project. In the DEA, the Commission's staff 
has analyzed the potential environmental impacts of the project and has 
concluded that approval of the project, with appropriate mitigation 
measures, would not constitute a major federal action significantly 
affecting the quality of the human environment.
    Copies of the DEA are available for review in the Public Reference 
Branch, Room 2A, of the Commission's offices at

[[Page 990]]

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    Please submit any comments within 30 days from the date of this 
notice. Comments should be addressed to Lois D. Cashell, Secretary, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. Please affix Project No. 11437 to all comments. 
For further information, please contact Mark Pawlowski, Environmental 
Coordinator, at (202) 219-2795.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-210 Filed 1-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
#### R. Galanti & Bros., Inc. (George F. Doherty Co.—Broker), et al. *v.*United States

No. 7913.

Entry No. 781727, etc.

*462(Decided November 30, 1950)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson (Sidney Mandell*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attoney General *(Charles J. Miville,*special! attorney), for the defendant.

Oliveb, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the-merchandise subject of the above entitled reappraisement appeals consists of' accordians [sic] exported from Italy, and that the proper dutiable value of said merchandise is the export value as defined in Section 402-(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that at the time of exportation of the merchandise covered by said', reappraisements, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers for export to the United States in the principal markets of Italy in the-usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of containers and coverings of whatsoever nature- and or other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States at the entered and! appraised values less the additions made under Section 503 under duress.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that there was no higher foreign market value for the merchandise herein on the dates of exportation.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On tbe agreed, facts I find the export value, as that value is defined' in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the entered and appraised values, less the additions made under section 503 of the Tariff Act of 1930 under so-called duress.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
### The dangers and handling of hazardous chemicals in the geologic laboratory

By: Alice RiedmillerPhoebe L. HauffRichard W. Mathias

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir924

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Jorge V. DIAZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-717.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 17, 1978.

Jorge V. Diaz in pro per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Linda Collins Hertz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Jorge V. Diaz, was found guilty by a jury of first degree murder and of robbery in October of 1974. He was represented at trial by privately employed counsel. An appeal from the judgment and sentence was prosecuted. See 323 So.2d 289 (Fla.3d DCA 1975).

On February 16, 1977, Diaz filed a pro se motion to vacate the judgment and sentence. The main thrust of this motion appears to be that his privately employed counsel was so incompetent that the defendant did not receive a fair trial. The trial judge denied the motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing. This appeal is from that order.

The defendant argues that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing. We do not agree. The motion did not present grounds for relief. See the rule in *Cappetta v. Wainwright,*203 So.2d 609 (Fla.1967); *Brown v. State,*223 So.2d 337 (Fla.3d DCA 1969); and *Ford*v. *State,*210 So.2d 33 (Fla.2d DCA 1968).

Affirmed.