alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-58129, 2-92048, 2-97522, 2-97523,
333-92615, 333-92617 and 333-110663) of AMC Entertainment Inc. of our report dated June 21, 2004, except for Note 17 as to which the date is July 30, 2004, relating to the
financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Kansas
City, Missouri
July 30, 2004

---



QuickLinks
### ATTACHMENT H : Worksheets Us ed to Calculate EPA and Federal

Government Labor Costs

NAICS: 999100

EPA or Federal Government

Labor Category: Formula Managerial Technical Clerical

Unloaded Hourly Rate 1 = W $56.54 $37.15 $21.15

Benefits Percentage 2 Lb = B/W 46.3% 46.3% 46.3%

Benefits per hour B = W*Lb $26.19 $17.21 $9.80

Loaded Hourly Rate Wb = W + B =

W(1+Lb) $82.73 $54.36 $30.95

Overhead Percentage 3 Lo = OH/Wb 50% 50% 50%

Overhead per hour OH = Wb*Lo $41.36 $27.18 $15.47

Fully Loaded Hourly

Rate Wf = Wb + OH

= W + B + OH $124.09 $81.53 $46.42

1. Data Source: BLS http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_999100.htm May 2014 data

NAICS 999100

- Federal Executive Branch

Standard Occupational Codes:

Management: 11

- 0000, Management Occupations

Technical: 19

- 0000, Life, Physical, and Social Science

Occupations updated

4/08/2014

Clerical: 43

- 0000, Office and Administrative Support Occupations

2. Fringe benefits/wage per hour. The average for non farm, non federal civilian workers.

3. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth Edition

, EPA

- 452

- 02

- 001, January 2002, pg. 2

- 34. The loading for indirect costs is within the range of 20

- 70%

of the load labor rate (wage + benefits) suggested in EPA guidance.
#### STATE INSURANCE FUND, petitioner, v. Kenneth G.M. MATHER, Trustee for the Estate of Southern Star Foods, Inc.

No. 98-310.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov. 2, 1998.

Motion of National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc., et al., for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae*granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Global Earth Energy, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending May 31, 2010, I, Sydney A. Harland, Chief Executive Officer of Global Earth Energy, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending May 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending May 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global Earth Energy, Inc.

Dated: July 20, 2010.

/s/ Sydney A. Harland

Sydney A. Harland, Chief Executive Officer of
    Global Earth Energy, Inc.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Bolivia [electronic resource].**
 
2002
Mar
Sep
2003
Mar
Oct
2004
Mar
Sep
2005
Jun
 
2007
May
Nov
2008
May
Nov
2009
May
Dec
 
 
SuDoc Number:ID 1.29:B 63/
Item Number:0900-I-20 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000632005
 
October 10, 2019
Exhibit 23(a)
                      (Richard A. Eisner & Company, L.L.P. Letterhead)

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Noise  Cancellation  Technologies,  Inc.  on Form S-3  (File  Nos.  33-47611,
33-51468,  33-74442,  33-84694 and 333-10545),  on Form S-1 (File Nos. 33-19926,
33-38584  and  33-44790)  and on Form S-8 (File  Nos.  33-64792,  333-11209  and
333-11213) of our report,  which  includes an  explanatory  paragraph  about the
Company's  ability to continue as a going  concern,  dated February 27, 1998, on
our audits of the consolidated  financial statements and schedule of the Company
as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996
and 1995 which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



/s/ Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP

New York, New York
March 31, 1998
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Michael A. Reisner, Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
      Officer of ICON Capital Corp., the General Partner of the Registrant in
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ICON Income Fund Eight B L.P. (the
      "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
      Report") certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the Partnership.








*Dated:
      November 13, 2007*





*/s/Michael A. Reisner*


Michael
      A. Reisner


Director,
      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the General
      Partner


(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


General
      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight B L.P.
II 

Calendar No. 195 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1339 

[Report No. 109–124] 

To reauthorize the Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design Program 

Act of 1994. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 30, 2005 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. CHAFEE, and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

AUGUST 31, 2005 

Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of July 29, 2005, by Mr. 

INHOFE, without amendment 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and 

Design Program Act of 1994. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Junior Duck Stamp 

5 Reauthorization Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•S 1339 RS

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION. 

2 The Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design 

3 Program Act of 1994 (16 U.S.C. 719 et seq.) is amend4 ed— 

5 (1) by redesignating the first section 6 (16 

6 U.S.C. 719c), relating to authorization of appropria7 tions, as section 7 and moving the section so as to 

8 appear at the end of the Act; and 

9 (2) in section 7 (as redesignated by paragraph 

10 (1)) by striking ‘‘2001 through 2005’’ and inserting 

11 ‘‘2006 through 2010’’. 

Calendar No. 195 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1339 

[Report No. 109–124] 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Junior Duck Stamp 

Conservation and Design Program Act of 1994. 

AUGUST 31, 2005 

Reported without amendment
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6717

PAUL D. BAKER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Director, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-296-7-jct) Submitted: June 10, 2004 Decided: June 21, 2004 Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul D. Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, William W. Muse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Paul D. Baker appeals from the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition by the district court. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that jurists of reason would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have reviewed the record and conclude that Baker has not made the requisite showing. We therefore deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Order entered July 5, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-11-01545-CV

BROYHILL FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC.

AND RANDY LAVERCOMBE, Appellants

V.

RANDY MURPHY AND DAVE SHAFFER, Appellees

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 08-13276

ORDER

We GRANT appellants’ June 21, 2013 motion to extend time to file a rehearing. 

Appellants’ motion for rehearing is due July 22, 2013.

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JAMES A. BIGGINS,

Plaintiff BelowAppellant,

v.

JOHN CARNEY, et al.,

Defendants BelowAppellees.

§

§

§ No. 183, 2017

§

§

§ Court Below: Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ C.A. No. K17C-02-038

§ 

§

O R D E R

This 12

th day of July 2017, it appears to the Court that, on June 7, 

2017, the Court entered an order denying the appellant’s motion to proceed 

in forma pauperis. The appellant was ordered to pay the required filing fee 

by July 7, 2017 or else his appeal would be dismissed without further notice. 

Appellant failed to pay the filing fee as ordered; therefore, dismissal of this 

action is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme 

Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

Justice
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 30, 2020

t0622

Order 

Clerk

June 30, 2020

160984

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 160984

COA: 346401

Wayne CC: 17-007272-FH

RODNEY BROWN,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 26, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To                my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,                in                all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of Atlantic BancGroup, Inc., as of and for the period covered by                the                report. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  May                11, 2007 | /s/                Barry W. Chandler                 |
|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                         | Barry                W. Chandler                     |
|                                         | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries VI, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 6, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries VI, Inc.
USGSHomeContactUSGSSearchUSGS

Data Series 482
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries VI, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 3, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries VI, Inc.
Exhibit 32


                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SLS International, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John Gott,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ John Gott
-------------------------
John Gott
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
November 16, 2005


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20722]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-58-007]


East Tennessee Natural Gas Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

July 31, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 28, 1997, East Tennessee Natural Gas 
Company (East Tennessee), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff 
sheets, with an effective date of June 1, 1997:

Substitute Original Sheet No. 294
Substitute Original Sheet No. 301
Substitute Original Sheet No. 302
Substitute Original Sheet No. 304

    East Tennessee states that the revised tariff sheets set forth the 
revisions required by the Commission's July 18, 1997, Order on 
Compliance Filing in the above-referenced docket (July 18, Order). East 
Tennessee Natural Gas Company, 80 FERC para. 61,076 (1997). East 
Tennessee further states that the revisions effect changes to East 
Tennessee's pro forma Electronic Data Interchange Trading Partner 
Agreement. In accordance with the July 18 Order, East Tennessee 
requests that these tariff sheets be deemed effective June 1, 1997.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
this proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20722 Filed 8-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries VI, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 3, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries VI, Inc.
#### V-Mart, Inc., Respondent, v Arthur L. Gaetano, Jr., Doing Business as Tally-Ho Video, et al., Defendants, and National Grange Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[614 NYS2d 355]

—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs *(see, Loafin’ Tree Rest, v Pardi*[appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 985). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Grow, J.—Discovery.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.
No. 99-8231 (99A658).

#### Goss *v.*Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.

Justice Stevens, Justice Souter, and Justice Ginsburg would grant the application for stay of execution.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 2, 2018

s0924 

# Order

Clerk October 2, 2018

156840

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 156840

COA: 338902

Macomb CC: 2014

- 001984

- FC

MICHAEL EDWARD LOFTIS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 17 , 2017

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).