alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T B E RNA R DINA S AN C HE Z DE GU TI ER RE Z, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 70715 A ge nc yN o. A 077- 290- 248 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r9, 2012 ** B efo re: R A W L IN S O N , M U R G U IA , an dW A T F O R D , C i rcu i tJu d g es. B e rnar di naS anc he z de G ut i e rr e z , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng her appealfr om an i m m i grat i on j ud ge’ s r em ov alorder. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 

# FI LED OC T 15 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 70715 2 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o q u e s tio n s o f law , Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 400 F .3 d7 8 5 , 7 9 1 - 9 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) , a n dw e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . In her openi ng bri ef

, S anchez de G ut i erre z f ai l s t o add re ss , and there fore has w ai ved any chal l enge t o, the B IA ’ s det erm i nat i on thatre cord evi dence other than her ow n st at em ent s t o b order agent s s up po rt ed her r em ov abi l i ty f or al i en s m u g g lin g . Se e M

a r t i n ez - Se rra n o v . I

NS , 94 F . 3d 1256, 1259- 60 ( 9th C i r . 1996) (hol di ng i ss ues thatar e notspec i fi ca l l y r ai se d andar gu ed i n a party’ s openi ng bri ef ar e w ai ved). W e the r e f

or e ne e d nota ddr e s s S anc he z de G ut i e rr e z ’ s c ont e nt i ons co n cern i n g th e ad m i ssi b i l i ty o f h er st at em en t s. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
From: jschwendeman@firstenergycorp.com 

 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Date: 07/07/2010 09:56 AM 

 Subject: Electronic Copy, FE Ext req 

Attached for your electronic files is a pdf copy of the FirstEnergy

Corp.

deadline extension request for the Effluent Guidelines ICR

questionnaire.

A hard copy of this request was submitted last week by courier.

(See attached file: FE ExtReq.pdf)

-----------------------------------------

The information contained in this message is intended only for the

personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If

the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an

agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you

are hereby notified that you have received this document in error

and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of

this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete

the original message.(See attached file: FE ExtReq.pdf)
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. John Adam WHITSELL v. Ross MAGGIO, Warden, etc.

No. 60399.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 27, 1977.

In re: John Adam Whitsell applying for remedial writs.

Writs denied.
No. 00-6904.

#### Rudd *v.*Polsner et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
4 4500445684 10/07

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IWVO(C5 NO. STD—521 REV.12-88

PUBLICATIONS AUTHORIZATION AND INVOICE

PUBLICATIONS AUTHORIZATION (To be completed by agency)

TO; (NAME AND ADDNESS OF NE.W5PAPER) • FEDESAL Lp..NQiSPC. SE. NO. FROM: (NAME AND ADDRESS OF AGENCY) AGENCYTELEPHONE NO. tncjcs co. ,ourier Times • 23—0433913 Yvette N. House, 717—787—9495 Attn: ad- Dept. of EnviroiI’mènta-I-Pro-tertj-n 8400 N. Bristo1Pike 400 Market St., 12th Floor Levittown, PA 19057 Harrisburg, PA 17105

HEREWITH IS ENCLOSED COPY FOR PUBLICATiON OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR PROPOSALS TO TYPE OF AD ‘c”k. ..

EMPLOY PURCHASE El CONTRACT 5ELL CLASSIFIED LEGAL NOTICE “‘9

.

ORDER NO. f5ecember 10, 2009

DA’rOFINSERJ1ON

ecem er 1 1 , 2009, Fridays edition SIGNAfTRAGENCY

.(}

You, as vendor, are authorized to publish this advertisement in your newspaper, subject to the terms of this order, as folloWs: Advertisement to be published in regular advertising columns, no position specified; caption of two lines and signature to L4 in,capitals,arid subject master ancktitle of officer..to le”set. solid fri ypergUlarIy’usbyyur tievspaper for pàblic (legal)’ notice advertising; charge to be made at the rate charged to and paid by commercial advertisers for matter similarly set and occupying similar space; advertisement to be run in the editions specified above. Vendor agrees that, in the performance of any contract awarded to it hereunder, said vendor will not discriminate against any employe or other persons on account of race, color,

sex, religious creed, ancestry, age or national origin and that the Commonwealth, upon receipt of satisfactory evidence of such discrimination, shall have the right to cancel said contract. Return this copy at once if you will not accept this advertisement underthe terms set forth.

Proof of advertising in the form of a tearsheet must be included on Parts 1,2 & 3. Return original and two copies (signed by the editor or publisher) to Agency listed above. Part 1 must be notarized. Part 4 is yours.

Commonwealth to be billed only for actual number of printed lines published.

152101

PUBUSH ADVERTISEME T (NO. OFTIMES) MAXIMUM NO. OF LINES

,.I’9. ...:

ACCOUNT FUND DERT APP YEAR LDG ORG COST FUNCTION O AMOUNT

CODE r,

CC I’- 3’Iotlo 6L’

VOlCE(Thbe completed by publisher):

DATE OF INSERTION ACTUAL NO OF PRINTED UNES COST PER LINE TOTAL AMOUNT

istAd (oOI:1Z

2ndAd or’ n€

3rdAd .“,.

. 1;d.

. .

, .k(’ . GRANDTOTAkI

....

. PASTETEARSHEET HERE

Con.ponweatth of Pennsylvania

County of ttJ C. V-

...

Before me, the subscriber, a Notary Public in and for 1saicl Coun,.ty, personally.came L_O l_1 (‘I t,

who being d

ulysorn

doth depose ançl

saythat he is” L.’ I I ‘) (,._O,:I C .

I’ii
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

I, Dennis P. Riordan, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of MFIC Corporation, hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that this Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that the
information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MFIC Corporation.

|                     |  | /s/DENNIS P. RIORDANName: Dennis P. Riordan
Title: Controller (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 29, 2004 |  |                                                                                                           

---



QuickLinks
#### Ernest GOFF, et ux. v. Anthony C. OCCHIPINTI et al.

No. 60724.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 14, 1977.

In re: Mr. and Mrs. Ernest Goff applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, E. Baton Rouge Parish. 349 So.2d 1325.

Writ denied.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

 

I, Michael Pehl, certify that:

 

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Immunomedics, Inc.; and

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date:  December 6, 2018

 
| /s/ Michael Pehl        |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Michael Pehl            |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**




In
      connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
      Report of Cintas Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending
      May 31, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Scott D. Farmer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
      the best of my knowledge:






(1) The
      Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and






(2) The
      information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.











/s/
      Scott D.
      Farmer


Scott
      D. Farmer


Principal
      Executive Officer




July
      30, 2007
#### BAR BOY INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellant, v. Joel F. PYLE, Sr., and Percy McIlwain d/b/a Kings Inn, and Coca Cola Bottling Company of West Palm Beach, Appellees.

No. 76-1130.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 27, 1977.

Roy W. Allman, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

W. R. Scott, Stuart, for appellees, Pyle and Mcllwain.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

CROSS and LETTS, JJ., concur.

MAGER, C. J., dissents, with opinion.

MAGER, Chief Judge,

dissenting:

A reading of the record suggests, most respectfully, that the ends of justice would best be served by reversing the order denying defendant-appellant’s motion to vacate.

The appellate record reflects allegations by the defendant-appellant that he had no notice or knowledge, constructive or otherwise, of the nonjury trial resulting in the final judgment rendered against it. Apparently defendant-appellant’s original counsel of record was aware of the trial date but had withdrawn as counsel of record prior to that date.

Whatever sanctions might be imposed upon defendant-appellant’s original counsel of record for alleged failure to advise his client of the trial, the circumstances of the instant case suggest that such conduct should not be visited upon the litigant; there is a sufficient showing of inadvertence or excusable neglect so as to necessitate relief from final judgment. *Crystal Lake Golf Course, Inc. v. Kalin,*252 So.2d 379 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). At the least, I would remand the ease to the trial court for the purpose of conducting an evidentiary hearing or for otherwise ascertaining how the trial court determined that “the said defendant had proper notice of trial through its counsel of record.” I therefore respectfully dissent.
Order filed October 25, 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00744

- CV

____________ JOANNA LAUFER , Appellant

V.
JUSTIN GORDON , Appellee

On Appeal from the 280th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2 017

- 67140



### ORDER
Appellant challenges the trial court’s order requiring her to pay costs. This court ordered and received a record on the hearing of inability to pay costs and further orders the trial court to issue detailed findings supporting its decisi on that appellant can afford to pay costs, pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145(f)(6).Accordingly, the trial court is directed to reduce to writing its findings of

fact on its order for appellant to pay costs and have a supplemental clerk’s reco rd containing those findings filed with the clerk of this c ourt within fifteen days of the
date of this order

.

PER CURIAM
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Illinois guardian [electronicresource].**
 
2006:Spring/Summer | Summer/Fall | Fall/Winter
2007:Winter/Spring | Spring/Summer | Fall/Winter
2008:Spring | Summer | Fall
2009:Winter | Spring | Fall
2010:Winter
 
SuDoc Number:D 12.23/6:
Item Number:0356-A-08 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000677343
 
January 10, 2020
#### Eloise Necaise BRADBURY v. CITY OF BAY ST. LOUIS, Mississippi.

No. 49982.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 15, 1978.

Nicholas M. Haas, Bay St. Louis, for appellant.

Bryant & Stennis, Roger T. Clark, Gulf-port, for appellee. .

Before PATTERSON, C- J-, and BROOM and LEE, JJ.

Affirmed.

INZER and SMITH, P. JJ., and ROBERTSON, SUGG, WALKER and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
PUBLIC LAW 106–428—NOV. 4, 2000 114 STAT. 1899

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 84:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 145 (1999): Nov. 18, considered and passed House.

Vol. 146 (2000): Nov. 1, considered and passed Senate, amended.

Nov. 3, House concurred in Senate amendments.

Æ

Public Law 106–428

106th Congress

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

106–275, is further amended by striking the date specified in section

106(c) and inserting ‘‘November 14, 2000’’.

Approved November 4, 2000.

Ante, p. 1898.

Nov. 4, 2000

[H.J. Res. 84]
No. 00-6796.

#### Lavender *v.*Butterworth, Attorney General of Florida, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Global Earth Energy, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending February 28, 2011, I, Edmund J. Gorman, Chief Financial Officer of Global Earth Energy, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending February 28, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending February 28, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global Earth Energy, Inc. Dated: April 19, 2011. /s/ Edmund J. Gorman   Edmund J. Gorman, Chief Financial Officer and
    Principal Accounting Officer of Global Earth
    Energy, Inc.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00444-CV

Taps Motors, L.L.C., Appellant

v.

Denise Estrada, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-14-000301, HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s brief was due on September 24, 2014. On October 13, 2014, this Court

notified appellant that its brief was overdue and that a failure to respond by October 23, 2014, would

result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a brief

or a motion for extension of time. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See

Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: November 26, 2014
#### Gabriele Louise BURGESS, Appellant, v. Donnie Ray BURGESS, Appellee.

No. DD-322.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 30, 1977.

*1079John H. French, Jr., Tallahassee, for appellant.

Philip S. Parsons and Howell L. Ferguson, MacFarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The learned trial judge, after hearing, found that the interests of the children of the parties will best be served by awarding their custody to the paternal grandparents. The polestar for guidance in custody proceedings is the best interests of the children. *(Brust v. Brust,*266 So.2d 400 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972)) Custody orders of a trial court reach this Court clothed with a strong presumption of correctness. *(Dinkel v. Dinkel,*322 So.2d 22 (Fla.1975)

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, C. J., and RAWLS and MASON, ERNEST E. (Ret.) Associate Judge, concur.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 95105-3901 

JAN 1 6 201 5 

V rl C. Martz 

Vic President Engineering & Enviromnent 

Phoenix C m nt Company and alt Riv r Sand & Rock . 

dba Salt River Materials Group 

8800 E. Chaparral Road, Suite 155 

Scott dale, AZ 85250 

Dear Mr. Martz: 

OFFICE OF THE 

REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR 

This letter r sponds to the petition from Phoenix Cement Company (PCC) dated November 3, 

2014 to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Gina McCarthy regarding 

EPA's final rule entitled '·Promulgation of Air Quality Implem ntation Plans; Arizona; Regional 

Haze and Inter tate Visibility Transport Federal Implementation Plan," published at 79 FR 

52420 (September 3, 2014) and your subsequent letter dated January 6, 2015 reque ting a 

respon e from EPA by January 14, 2015 . 

A you know, EPA proposed to set nitrogen oxides (NOx) emi sion limits for Kiln 4 at the 

Phoenix Cement Plant in Clarkdale Arizona based on a control efficiency for sel ctiv noncatalytic reduction (SNCR) of 50 percent. In re pon e to omments indicating that a higher 

control efficiency wa achi vable with SNCR, our final rule included a series of control 

technology demonstration r quirements ("optimization requirem nts") to assess whether lower 

emis ion limit would be achi vable with SNCR at Kiln 4. PCC's petition seeks reconsideration 

and an administrativ stay of the er quirements pursuant to section 307(d)(7)(B) of the Clean 

Air Action and section 705 of the Administrative Procedure Act. 

In response to your p ti ti on, EPA i granting r con ideration of the optimization requir ment 

for th Pho nix Cement Plant. We are not acting on your r quest for a stay at this time. 

If you have any questions regarding the reconsideration process, please contact Charlotte Withey 

at (415) 972-3915. We thanl you for your continued interest in this rule and look forward to 

hearing from you during the reconsid ration proces . 

Sincerely, 

Printed 0 11 Recycled Papu
#### Mrs. Roseline Duplantis LAPEYROUSE et al. v. Percy LECOMPTE, Horace Chauvin and Firemen’s Insurance Co. of Newark, New Jersey.

No. 59741.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 1977.

In re: Mrs. Roseline Duplantis Lapey-rouse et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, 343 So.2d 1117, First Circuit, Parish of Terrebonne.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the court of appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.

*1194DIXON, J., dissents, being of the opinion the driver of the left-turning car was negligent in turning left on the highway whether or not the fog obscured her vision.

CALOGERO, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. This guest passenger applicant is clearly entitled to recover from her host driver.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43004-43005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21099]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[AK-962-1410-00-P, AA-9242, AA-9252, and AA-9258]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

    In accordance with Departmental regulation 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice 
is hereby given that a decision to issue conveyance under the 
provisions of section 14(h)(1) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement 
Act of December 18, 1971, 43 U.S.C. 1601, 1613(h)(1), will be issued to 
Calista Corporation for approximately 14.47 acres. The lands involved 
are in the vicinity of Nunivak Island, Alaska.

Seward Meridian, Alaska

T. 3 S., R. 96 W.,
    Sec. 25.
T. 2 N., R. 98 W.,
    Sec. 2;
    Sec. 15.

    A notice of the decision will be published once a week, for four 
(4) consecutive weeks, in the Anchorage Daily News. Copies of the 
decision may be obtained by contacting the Alaska State Office of the 
Bureau of Land Management, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99513-7599 ((907) 271-5960).
    Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected 
by the decision, an agency of the Federal government or regional 
corporation, shall have until September 10, 1997 to file an appeal. 
However, parties receiving service by certified mail shall have 30 days 
from the date of receipt to file an appeal. Appeals must be filed in

[[Page 43005]]

the Bureau of Land Management at the address identified above, where 
the requirements for filing an appeal may be obtained. Parties who do 
not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR part 
4, subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.
Patricia A. Baker,
Land Law Examiner, ANCSA Team, Branch of 962 Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 97-21099 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 43294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21339]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 660

[I.D. 061897A]
RIN 0648-AJ57


Fisheries Off West Coast States and in the Western Pacific; 
Western Pacific Crustacean Fisheries; Vessel Monitoring System; 
Correction

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects a rule published in the Federal Register 
of July 1, 1997. The regulations implemented a voluntary vessel 
monitoring system for the Western Pacific Crustacean Fisheries.

DATES: Effective August 13, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William D. Chappell at 301-713-2341.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 1, 1997, when NMFS added the 
definition for Crustaceans Permit Area 1 VMS Subarea to Sec. 660.12, 
NMFS inadvertently misspelled the name of Nihoa Island in the second 
sentence.

Correction of Publication

    The publication on July 1, 1997 (62 FR 35448) [I.D. 061897A], FR 
Doc. 97-17153, is corrected as follows:


Sec. 660.12  [Corrected]

    On page 35449, in Sec. 660.12, in the definition of Crustaceans 
Permit Area 1 VMS Subarea, in the third column, on the second line, the 
word ``Nohow'' is corrected to read ``Nihoa''.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: August 7, 1997.
Rolland A Schmitten,
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 97-21339 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F