alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
XCL Ltd. and Subsidiaries
                                
    Exhibit 11-Computation of Earnings Per Common and Common
                        Equivalent Share
                                
        (Amounts in thousands except, per share amounts)


                                              1996       1995       1994
                                              ----       ----       ----
PRIMARY:

Net loss                                   $ (12,074) $ (87,837)  $  (36,622)

Dividends on preferred stock                  (5,356)    (4,821)      (4,907)
                                             -------    -------     --------
Net loss attributable to common stock      $ (17,430) $ (92,658)   $  41,529
                                             =======    =======     ========
Weighted average number of shares 
  common stock outstanding                   265,573    240,707      198,303
                                             =======    =======      =======

                                           $    (.07) $    (.38)   $    (.21)
                                             =======    =======       ====== 

FULLY DILUTED:

  Fully diluted net loss per common
    and common equivalent share                (1)          (1)          (1)

___________
(1)     All amounts are anti-dilutive or immaterial and therefore
not presented in the financial statements.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1295 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1295

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to provide for accountability 
         and funding of the National Indian Gaming Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Indian Gaming Commission 
Accountability Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. COMMISSION ACCOUNTABILITY AND FUNDING.

    (a) Powers of the Commission.--Section 7 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2706) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(d) Application of Government Performance and Results Act.--
            ``(1) In general.--In carrying out any action under this 
        Act, the Commission shall be subject to the Government 
        Performance and Results Act of 1993 (Public Law 103-62; 107 
        Stat. 285).
            ``(2) Plans.--In addition to any plan required under the 
        Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (Public Law 103-
        62; 107 Stat. 285), the Commission shall submit a plan to 
        provide technical assistance to tribal gaming operations in 
        accordance with that Act.''.
    (b) Commission Funding.--Section 18(a)(2) of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2717(a)(2)) is amended by striking 
subparagraph (B) and inserting the following:
                    ``(B) The total amount of all fees imposed during 
                any fiscal year under the schedule established under 
                paragraph (1) shall not exceed 0.080 percent of the 
                gross gaming revenues of all gaming operations subject 
                to regulation under this Act.''.

            Passed the Senate December 12, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1295

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to provide for accountability 
         and funding of the National Indian Gaming Commission.
```
FILED IN COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS May 15,2015 ABELACOSTA. CLERK NO. AP-77,047

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

KENNETH THOMAS Appellant VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee AP-77,047 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 5/14/2015 7:43:45 PM Accepted 5/15/2015 7:52:50 AM ABEL ACOSTA CLERK

'•S ¥ y 

## j 

# s „^
^ / \> X

APPEALING THE TRIAL COURT'S CAPITAL JUDGMENT ASSESSING THE DEATH SENTENCE BASED ON JURY VERDICT OF GUILTY AND ANSWERS TO SPECIAL ISSUES IN CAUSE NUMBER F86-85539-M FROM THE 194^® JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS THE HONORABLE ERNEST B. WHITE, HI, JUDGE PRESIDING

MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE REPORTER'S RECORD

COMES NOW KENNETH THOMAS, by and through his 

### appointed attorney on appeal, JohnTatum,and respectfully submits this Motion to

### Supplementthe Reporter's Record in the above entitled and numbered cause. In support ofthis Motion, Appellant would show this Honorable Courtthe following:
I. 

### The Defendant, Kenneth Thomas, pleadednot guilty to the charge of 

### Capital Murder before the Honorable Emest B. White, Judge Presiding ofthe 194^^ Judicial District Court ofDallas County and a jury. Thejuryfound the 

### Defendant guilty and punishment was assessed at death by lethal injection.
II. 

### The Reporter's Record has been filed in this cause.
III. 

### Appellant has raised issues ofprejudice in the admission into 

### evidenceofautopsy photographs introduced attrial. State's Exhibits Nos. 58-83. The original colorphotographs were placed into evidence before the jury and are 

### necessaryto aid this Court inresolving theissues raised onappeal to the Court of Criminal Appeals.

### WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellantprays that this Court will grant his Motionto Supplementthe Reporter's Record in this Cause. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ John Tatum JOHN TATUM 990 SOUTH SHERMAN STREET RICHARDSON, TEXAS 75081 (972) 705-9200 BAR NO. 19672500

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE


### I, JOHN TATUM, do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of 

### the foregoing Motion to Supplement the Record was delivered to Susan Hawk, Criminal DistrictAttomey, Appellate Section, 11th floor, Frank Crowley Criminal Courts Building, Dallas, Texas 75207, on this day of May, 2015. Is/ John Tatum John TatumCERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 

### I certify that this submitted e-mail attachment to file Motion to Supplement complies with the following requirements ofthe Court: 1. The petition is submitted by e-mail attachment; 2. The e-mail attachment is labeled with the following information:A. Case Name: Kenneth Thomas B. The Appellate Case Number: 77,047 

### C. The Type ofDocument: Motion to Supplement Record D. Party for whom the document is being submitted: Appellant E. The Word Processing Software and Version Used to Prepare the Motion : Word Perfect X7

case. 

### 3. Copies have been sent to all parties associated with this /s/JohnTatum 5/14/15 (Signature offiling party and date) John Tatum 

### (Printed name) John Tatum, Attorney at Law 

### Emailed Copy of Motion
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Former employee receives DoD leadership award

By Elizabeth StoeckmannDLA Energy Public Affairs

                ARLINGTON, Virginia  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Technology and Logistics Acquisition and Contracting Legends AwardDLA EnergyawardsUnder Secretary of Defense for Acquisition
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Partnership. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                Freddie M. Kotek                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Freddie                M. Kotek                                        |
| Title: | Chief                Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner |
| Date:  | May                11, 2007                                            |
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Huifeng Bio-Pharmaceutical Technology,
Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of, I, Jing’an Wang, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The
Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date: May
19, 2009




/S/
      Jing’an WangJing’an
      Wang
              Chief
      Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




The Board of Directors
of FVNB Corp.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-75029 on Form S-8 of FVNB Corp. filed on March 26, 2001, of our report
dated January 26, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of FVNB
Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31,2000 and 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, shareholders'
equity and cash flows for the years then ended, which report is included in
this December 31,2000 annual report on Form 10-K of FVNB Corp.

/s/ KPMG, LLP



March 26, 2001
No. 99-7937.

#### Culp *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1206 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 147
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1206

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4960 West Washington Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the 
                 ``Ray Charles Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 9, 2005

 Mrs. Feinstein (for herself and Mrs. Boxer) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

                             June 29, 2005

     Committee discharged and ordered to be placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4960 West Washington Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the 
                 ``Ray Charles Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4960 
West Washington Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Ray Charles Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ray Charles Post Office 
Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 147

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1206

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4960 West Washington Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the 
                 ``Ray Charles Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 29, 2005

     Committee discharged and ordered to be placed on the calendar
```
Exhibit 32.1





|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|Certification of CEO and CFO                 
|Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,          
|As Adopted Pursuant to                       
|Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Davidson Diversified Real Estate I, L.P. (the "Partnership"), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: March 25, 2008   
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: March 25, 2008   



This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Thad POWELL, E. L. Caston and Bryant Jones v. W. L. BARRON, Monroe McElveen, Amite County Livestock Association, Inc. and County of Amite.

No. 49502.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

July 13, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 10, 1977.

Adams, Forman, Truly, Ward, Smith & Bramlette, David C. Bramlette, III, Natchez, for appellant.

McGehee, McGehee & Torrey, H. B. Mayes McGehee, Meadville, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Amite County; Bert N. Jones, Chancellor.

Before SUGG, WALKER and BROOM, JJ., and WILLIAM NEVILLE, Commissioner.

AFFIRMED.
#### Billy J. TAYLOR v. George A. BROOM, Sheriff of St. Tammany Parish.

No. 11291.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

May 9, 1977.

*1268Byron D. Magbee, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellant.

William N. Faller, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellee.

Before ELLIS, CHIASSON and PONDER, JJ.

PONDER, Judge.

This is a personal injury suit. Plaintiff has appealed the dismissal.

The only issue is the alleged manifest error in finding that plaintiff failed to prove his case.

We affirm.

Plaintiff, while a prisoner in jail, was beating on the steel wall of his cell and screaming. The judge holding court on the lower floor complained of the disruption. After the deputies made several unsuccessful efforts to quieten the plaintiff, the judge ordered the deputies to do whatever was necessary to stop the noise.

Plaintiff’s version is that several deputies, after beating and kicking him, chained him to his cell window. He neither provoked nor resisted the deputies. Three fellow inmates called as plaintiff’s witnesses corroborated plaintiff’s story of mistreatment but had major differences not only among themselves but also with plaintiff.

The deputies and former deputies, witnesses for the defense, testified that plaintiff was handcuffed to the bars of his cell window without any mistreatment or undue difficulty. Although there were some variances in their accounts, each stated positively that he neither struck plaintiff nor saw him struck by any other deputy.

The trial judge said that plaintiff’s witnesses had been completely discredited because of the inconsistencies among themselves and with plaintiff. The case therefore depended on plaintiff’s credibility as opposed to that of the deputies. He held that plaintiff failed to prove his case by a preponderance of the evidence. We cannot say that he committed manifest error. *Canter v. Koehring,*La., 283 So.2d 716 (1973); *Billiot v. Bourg,*La., 338 So.2d 1148 (1976).

The judgment is therefore affirmed; appellant is cast with all costs.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>    1
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997             NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997             NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,649,774               1,422,783
<SECURITIES>                                 3,800,688               3,180,881
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,595,598               5,084,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (664,325)             (1,066,549)
<INVENTORY>                                  6,014,672               5,875,742
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,471,579              14,351,509
<PP&E>                                       2,470,524               2,335,973
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,820,855)             (1,451,230)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,224,291              17,038,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,139,769               4,983,870
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        72,136                  71,675
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,030,355              11,983,207
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,224,291              17,038,752
<SALES>                                     37,708,922              39,469,098
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            38,002,875              39,705,023
<CGS>                                       14,460,364              15,171,055
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,730,052              37,790,397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (17,779)                  45,855
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,888                  50,756
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,272,823               1,914,626
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,241,329                 863,292
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,031,494               1,051,334
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,031,494               1,051,334
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25                     .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25                     .13
        

</TABLE>