alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1284 

To designate the John L. Burton Trail in the Headwaters Forest Reserve, 

California. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 21, 2005 

Mrs. BOXER (for herself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To designate the John L. Burton Trail in the Headwaters 

Forest Reserve, California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JOHN L. BURTON TRAIL. 

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 

5 ‘‘John L. Burton Trail Act’’. 

6 (b) DESIGNATION OF JOHN L. BURTON TRAIL.—Any 

7 trail authorized by the final management plan under sec8 tion 501(i) of Public Law 105–33 (111 Stat. 1613) for 

9 Headwaters Forest Reserve, California, that is con10 structed to provide access to the southern end of the 
2 

•S 1284 IS

1 Headwaters Grove near the existing Salmon Trailhead 

2 shall be known as the ‘‘John L. Burton Trail’’. 

Æ
#### Jessie H. SUMMERS v. Thelma Jean Young SUMMERS (Walton).

No. 49529.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

July 27, 1977.

H. L. B. Foote, Jackson, for appellant.

Pittman & Nobles, James W. Nobles, Jr., Jackson, for appellee.

Before INZER, P. J., and ROBERTSON and WALKER, JJ.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Hinds County; J. C. Stennett, Chancellor.

AFFIRMED.
# C_2013225EN.01008601.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/86 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/86

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 15 April 2013 — Andersen v Court of Auditors

(Case F-1/12) (1)

1

(Civil service - Officials - Retirement on grounds of invalidity - Article 78 of the Staff Regulations - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

2013/C 225/198

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Henrik Andersen (Hals, Denmark) (represented by: S. Rodriguez. A. Blot and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Court of Auditors of the European Union (represented by: T. Kennedy. N. Scafarto and B. Schäfer, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the Court of Auditors refusing to pay compensation for the loss purportedly suffered following the applicant’s retirement on grounds of invalidity.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | Mr Andersen is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Court of Auditors of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Andersen is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Court of Auditors of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 133, 5.5.2012, p. 29.

1

---
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 125 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 501 I Street in 

Sacramento, California, as the ‘‘Robert T. Matsui United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2005 

Mrs. BOXER (for herself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, and Mr. DURBIN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse located at 501 

I Street in Sacramento, California, as the ‘‘Robert T. 

Matsui United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse located at 501 I Street 

5 in Sacramento, California, shall be known and designated 

6 as the ‘‘Robert T. Matsui United States Courthouse’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 
2

S 125 IS

1 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

2 to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert T. Matsui United States 

3 Courthouse’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly  report of Endo Networks,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ended  December  31,  2003 as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1. the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Dated:  March 10, 2004

/s/ Peter B. Day
-------------------------------
Name:   Peter B. Day
Title:  Chief Financial Officer




<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

Certification of Treasurer



I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Big Sky Industries III, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: January 20, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Michael J. Degen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Nortech Systems Incorporated on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Nortech Systems Incorporated.

|By: |  | /s/ Michael J. DegenMichael J. Degen
Chief Executive Officer
Nortech Systems Incorporated |  | 
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

I,
Richard G. Wasielewski, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Nortech Systems Incorporated on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Nortech Systems Incorporated.

|By: |  | /s/ Richard G. WasielewskiRichard G. Wasielewski
Chief Financial Officer
Nortech Systems Incorporated |  | 
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20695]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3041-000]


Dayton Power & Light Company; Notice of Filing

July 31, 1997.
    Take notice that on June 19, 1997, Dayton Power & Light Company 
tendered for filing an amendment in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before August 11, 1997. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20695 Filed 8-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
CONTACT:






Stewart
                E. McClure, Jr.
            Gerard
                RikerPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer
            EVP
                and Chief Financial Officer(908)
                630- 5000
            (908)
                630-5018








PRESS
      RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE




**SOMERSET
      HILLS BANCORP ANNOUNCES $0.04 PER SHARE QUARTERLY CASH DIVIDEND**


**AND
      INCREASED STOCK**


**RE-PURCHASE
      PROGRAM**







BERNARDSVILLE,
      NJ –OCTOBER 26, 2007 - Somerset Hills Bancorp (NASDAQ  “SOMH”) announced
      today that its Board of Directors has declared a quarterly cash dividend of
      $0.04, payable November 30 to shareholders of record as of November 15,
      2007.





In
      addition, the Board approved an increase in the Company’s previously announced
      stock re-purchase program, increasing total authorized repurchases to 500,000
      shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock. Under the program,
      re-purchases may be made from time to time in the open market or in privately
      negotiated transactions at such prices as management of the Company deems
      appropriate.




Mr.
      Stewart E. McClure, Jr., the President and Chief Executive Officer of the
      Company stated: “We are pleased to announce this latest quarterly cash dividend.
      The third quarter of 2007 marks the 10th consecutive quarter in which we paid
      a
      cash dividend, and 2007 marks the 6th consecutive year in which we paid a stock
      dividend. To date, we have repurchased approximately 137,000 shares through
      our
      existing repurchase program, and we believe that increasing our buy back program
      is an appropriate use of our capital to enhance shareholder value and liquidity
      in our stock.”





Somerset
      Hills Bancorp is a bank holding company for Somerset Hills Bank, a full service
      commercial bank with offices in Bernardsville, Long Valley, Madison, Mendham,
      Morristown, and Summit, New Jersey.  Somerset Hills Bank focuses its
      lending activities on small to medium sized businesses, high net worth
      individuals, professional practices, and consumer and retail customers. 
The Bank operates a licensed mortgage company subsidiary, Sullivan Financial
      Services, Inc. and also operates Somerset Hills Wealth Management Services,
      LLC,
      a wholly owned subsidiary licensed to provide financial services, including
      financial planning, insurance (life, health, property and casualty), mutual
      funds and annuities for individuals and commercial accounts, and Somerset Hills
      Title Group, LLC, which, with its partner, Property Title Group, provides title
      services in connection with the closing of real estate transactions.  The
      common stock of the Company is traded on NASDAQ under the symbol SOMH.  You
      can visit our website at www.somersethillsbank.com.







5
EXHIBIT 99.1


                       CERTIFICATION OF THE PRESIDENT

                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    I, Ramon Chimelis, president, treasurer, and secretary, certify that the
forgoing quarterly report on Form 10-QSB containing the financial statements
set forth within fully comply with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)) and that
information contained in the quarterly report presents fairly, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Big
Sky Industries IV, Inc.

Date: May 20, 2003                  /s/ Ramon Chimelis
                                    --------------------
                                    Ramon Chimelis
                                    President



<PAGE>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21181]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than September 5, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Karen L. Grandstrand, Vice 
President) 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-2171:
    1. Bloomer Bancshares, Inc., Bloomer, Wisconsin; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Peoples State Bank, Bloomer, Wisconsin.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 6, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-21181 Filed 8-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 33-50508) pertaining to the Maxicare Health Plans, Inc. 1990 Stock
Option Plan, and the stock option agreement with Peter J. Ratican dated December
5, 1990, the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (No. 333-12803) pertaining to the Maxicare Health Plans, Inc. Outside
Directors 1996 Formula Stock Option Plan, the Maxicare Health Plans, Inc. Senior
Executives 1996 Stock Option Plan, the Maxicare Health Plans, Inc. 1995 Stock
Option Plan, the Restricted Stock Grant Agreement by and between Maxicare Health
Plans, Inc. and Peter J. Ratican dated as of February 27, 1995, the Restricted
Stock Grant Agreement by and between Maxicare Health Plans, Inc. and Eugene L.
Froelich dated as of February 27, 1995; the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-88005) pertaining to the Maxicare
Health Plans, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan; and the incorporation by reference in
the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-48458) and the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-2 (No. 333-41510) of our
report dated April 2, 2004 with respect to the 2003 consolidated financial
statements and schedules of Maxicare Health Plans, Inc. in its annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Los Angeles, California
April 9, 2004
#### Barbara Rankin MOUTZ v. Michael Benton MOUTZ.

No. 11564.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

June 13, 1977.

Richard W. Langford, Baton Rouge, for appellant.

A. J. Paul Fredrickson, Baton Rouge, for appellee.

Before SARTAIN, COVINGTON and LOTTINGER, JJ.

COVINGTON, Judge.

Plaintiff-defendant in rule, Barbara Rankin Moutz, appealed an unfavorable judgment changing the award of custody of the minor child, Michael Benton Moutz, Jr., from Barbara Rankin Moutz to Michael *1288Benton Moutz, the father of the child, and mover in rule. All pertinent dates occurred in 1977.

At the conclusion of the hearing on the rule on February 25, 1977, at which both parties and their respective attorneys were present, the trial judge ruled in favor of the mover in rule. In accordance therewith, judgment was signed on March 3, 1977. The defendant in rule had not requested notification pursuant to LSA-C.C.P. art. 1913. On March 10, 1977, she moved for and obtained an order of appeal as permitted by LSA-C.C.P. art. 3943 (which appeal does not suspend the execution of the judgment relating to custody), conditioned upon her filing a bond in the amount of $350.00. Thereafter, the bond was filed on April-22.

Under the express provisions of LSA-C.C.P. arts. 3942, 3943, the appeal must be perfected within thirty days. The delay for applying for a new trial began to run on March 4 and expired on March 14. Consequently, the bond was not timely filed and our jurisdiction did not attach.

The jurisdiction of our court does not attach unless the order of appeal and the bond are timely filed. See *Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons,*283 So.2d 85 (La.1973); *Kreshel v. Kreshel,*326 So.2d 887 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1976).

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed at the appellant’s cost.

DISMISSED.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

Certification of Treasurer



I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Big Sky Industries IV, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: February 3, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer