alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered Ju ly 5 , 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 11

- 01545

- CV

BROYHILL FURNITURE I NDUSTRIES , INC.

AND RANDY LAVERCOMBE

, Appellant s

V.

RANDY MURPHY AND DAV E SHAFFER, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 44th Judic ial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 08

- 13276



### O RDER

We GRANT appellants’ June 21, 2013 motion to extend time to file a rehearing.

Appellants’ motion for rehearing is due July 22, 2013.

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS

JUSTICE
Exhibit 11

# The Middleton Doll
Company and SubsidiariesComputation Of Net Income Per Common Share

|                                    | For the Year Ended December 31,
|----------------------------------- | -------------------------------
|
|Net (loss) income available to      |                                
|common shareholders                 |                                
|                                    |                                
|Determination of shares:            |                                
|Weighted average common shares      |                                
|outstanding (basic)                 |                                
|Assumed conversion of stock options |                                
|                                    |                                
|Weighted average common shares      |                                
|outstanding (diluted)               |                                
|                                    |                                
|Basic (loss) earnings per share     |                                
|                                    |                                
|Diluted (loss) earnings per share   |                                
|                                    |
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-14-00444- CV
Taps Motors, L.L.C., Appellan t

v. Denise Estrada, Appellee

F ROM TH E CO UNTY COURT AT LAW NO . 1 O F TRAVIS CO UNTY NO. C-1 -CV- 14- 0003 01, H ONO RAB LE J. DAVID P HI LLIP S, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant’s brief was due on September 24, 2014. On October 13, 2014, this Court notified appellant that its brief was overdue and that a failure to respond by October 23, 2014, would result in the dismiss al of this appea l for want of prosec ution. To date, appellant has not filed a brief
or a motion for extension of time. Acc ording ly , we dismiss this appea l for want of prosec ution. See Tex. R. App. P . 38.8(a) , 42.3(b).

__________________________________________ Scott K. Field, Just ice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton, and F ield Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: Nove mber 26, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21319]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-2915-001]


Pennsylvania Power & Light Company; Notice of Filing

August 7, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 18, 1997, Pennsylvania Power & Light 
Company (PP&L), filed a Refund Report in connection with a late-filed 
Service Agreement with Baltimore Gas & Electric Company (BG&E) for the 
sale of capacity and/or energy under PP&L's Short Term Capacity and/or 
energy Sales Tariff. The Service Agreement adds BG&E as an eligible 
customer under the Tariff.
    PP&L states that copies of this filing have been supplied to BG&E 
and to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before August 20, 1997. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21319 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Marks & Spencer Sales Corp. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6932.

Entry No. 700881, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, June 6, 1941, etc.

Certified June 8, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 7, 1941, etc.

(Decided February 28, 1947)

*Fred Bennett*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge (Abstract):

These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn*Corp., 33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

Undisputed facts establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise is export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), and that such statutory values for the articles in question are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.
114 STAT. 1424 PUBLIC LAW 106–371—OCT. 27, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3577:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106–599 (Comm. on Resources).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 106–435 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

May 8, considered and passed House.

Oct. 13, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–371

106th Congress

An Act

To increase the amount authorized to be appropriated for the north side pumping

division of the Minidoka reclamation project, Idaho.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That section

5 of the Act of September 30, 1950 (chapter 1114; 64 Stat. 1085),

authorizing appropriations for the north side pumping division of

the Minidoka reclamation project, Idaho, is amended by striking

‘‘$11,395,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$14,200,000’’.

Approved October 27, 2000.

Oct. 27, 2000

[H.R. 3577]
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-30466 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIE JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. CR-94-30022-ALL
- - - - - - - - - - February 29, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Willie Johnson argues that the disparity in the penalty provisions and sentencing guidelines applicable to crack cocaine and cocaine powder violates his equal protection rights. We have rejected the argument that the sentencing guidelines for crack cocaine and cocaine powder violate the Equal Protection Clause. See United States v. Watson , 953 F.2d 895, 897-98 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 504 U.S. 928 (1992). We have reviewed the record and the briefs and find no reversible error. AFFIRMED.
#### GULFSTREAM CENTER ENTERPRISES, INC., and Steven Paskind, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida ex rel. Richard E. GERSTEIN, as State Attorney for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-741.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 29, 1977.

Augus M. Stephens, Jr., Max B. Kogen and Geoffrey C. Fleck, Miami, for appellants.

Richard E. Gerstein, State Atty. and Kurt Marmar, Asst. State Atty., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., NATHAN, J., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

*1323PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of *North Bay Village Lions Foundation, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach,*338 So.2d 236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).
Exhibit 23.(b)

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-115006 and 333-132895 on Form SB-2 and
Registration Statement Nos. 33-6300, 33-19372, 33-38928, 33-38925, 33-86726, 333-14607, 333-29949,
333-85988, 333-99233, and 333-143557 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 1, 2006, pertaining to the consolidated financial statements of
MFIC Corporation which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/
Brown & Brown, LLP

Boston,
Massachusetts
March 18, 2008

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43521]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21466]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-679-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

August 8, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 1, 1997, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia), 1700 MacCorkle Avenue, S.E., Charleston, West 
Virginia 25314, filed a prior notice request with the Commission in 
Docket No. CP97-679-000 pursuant to Section 157.205 of the Commission's 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to 
construct and operate an additional delivery point for firm 
transportation service to Commonwealth Gas Services, Inc. (COS) in the 
City of Chesapeake, Virginia, under Columbia's blanket certificates 
issued in Docket Nos. CP83-76-000 and CP86-240-000 pursuant to Section 
7 of the NGA, all as more fully set forth in the request that is open 
to the public for inspection.
    Columbia proposes to construct and operate an additional delivery 
point to serve COS' commercial and residential customers in the Deep 
Creek area of Chesapeake. Columbia proposes to reassign up to 5,000 
Dekatherms equivalents of natural gas per day (Dth/day) at the proposed 
Deep Creek delivery point and to reduce deliveries to COS by 5,000 Dth/
day at the existing Portsmouth #1 delivery point. Columbia would 
deliver up to 1,825,000 Dth annually under its FERC Rate Schedule SST 
at the proposed Deep Creek delivery point and within certificated 
entitlements to COS. Columbia states that COS would reimburse Columbia 
approximately $187,200 for the construction cost of the proposed Deep 
Creek delivery point.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after the 
Commission has issued this notice, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or 
notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the request. If 
no protest is filed within the allowed time, the proposed activity 
shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time 
allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn 
within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant 
request shall be treated as an application for authorization pursuant 
to Section 7 of the NGA.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21466 Filed 8-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 3.04
                                                                    ------------

                               ARTICLES OF MERGER
                                       OF
                             BOULDER BREWING COMPANY
                            ( a Colorado corporation)
                                       AND
                           BOULDER ACQUISITIONS, INC.
                             (a Nevada corporation)

To the Secretary of State
State of Colorado

Pursuant  to the  provisions  of the  Colorado  Business  Corporation  Act,  the
domestic  corporation  herein named does hereby submit the following Articles of
Merger.

FIRST:    Annexed  hereto  and  made a part  hereof  is the Plan of  Merger  for
          merging Boulder  Brewing  Company with and into Boulder  Acquisitions,
          Inc., as approved by  resolution  adopted at a meeting by the Board of
          Directors  of  Boulder  Brewing  Company  on  August  24,  2001 and by
          resolution  adopted at a meeting by the Board of  Directors of Boulder
          Acquisitions, Inc. on September 10, 2001.

SECOND:   The number of votes cast for the Plan of Merger by each  voting  group
          of Boulder Brewing  Company  entitled to vote separately on the merger
          was sufficient for approval by that voting group.

THIRD:    The  merger  herein  provided  for is  permitted  by the  laws  of the
          jurisdiction of organization of Boulder  Acquisitions,  Inc. and is in
          compliance with said laws.

FOURTH:   The  address,  wherever  located,  of  the  principal  office  of  the
          surviving corporation is 211 West Wall St., Midland, Texas 70701.

Executed on this 10th day of September 2001.

Boulder Brewing Company

By:  /S/ Glenn A. Little
------------------------
Glenn A. Little
President

Boulder Acquisitions, Inc.

By:  /S/ Glenn A. Little
------------------------
Glenn A. Little
President
#### DON GREENE PROVISIONS, INC., Appellant, v. ROYAL TRUST BANK OF MIAMI, N.A. f/k/a International Bank of Miami, Appellee.

No. 76-1009.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 17, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 10, 1978.

David Bercuson; Bartel, Levine & Shu-ford and Judy D. Shapiro, Miami, for appellant.

Pallot, Stern, Proby, Adkins and Mark Pollack, Miami, for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and BARK-DULL and HUBBART, JJ.

*109PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Messeroff v. Kantor,*261 So.2d 553 (Fla.3d DCA 1972).
#### Willie James POPE v. STATE.

7 Div. 410.

Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.

BOOKOUT, Judge.

On October 19, 1976, 345 So.2d 1388, this Court remanded this cause with directions to the circuit court. On November 16,1976, on rehearing, we extended the opinion, stating:

> “Through his brief on rehearing, appellant contends that it is impossible to obtain an accurate transcript or a statement in lieu thereof. While we have no reason to doubt this, it is not a matter appearing of record and this Court is bound by the record, not the allegations appearing in brief.

> “The trial court is the proper forum to determine whether or not it is possible to provide an accurate transcript or a statement in lieu of a transcript. If on remand to the trial court, appellant can support the allegations, as expressed in his brief on rehearing, the trial court should make a finding to that effect. The trial court is authorized to-grant a new trial if its findings in this regard are favorable to the appellant.” (Citations omitted.)

The State petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. On January 7, 1977, the trial court, acting on our extended opinion, above, granted appellant a new trial. Certification of that fact was filed with this Court and with the Supreme Court on January 12, 1977. The Supreme Court, by order of January 13, 1977, 345 So.2d 1390, dismissed the petition for writ of certiorari as moot. We therefore dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

All the Judges concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with this Quarterly Report of Goldspring, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen B. Parent,
Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


August 16, 2004                                 /s/ Stephen B. Parent
                                                -------------------------------
                                                    Stephen B. Parent
                                                    Principal Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21219]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP96-403-004]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Refund Report

August 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 1, 1997, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) 
tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
(Commission) a report summarizing refunds disbursed on July 1, 1997. 
These refunds represent an over collection on its Viking Costs of 
$7,740,793, plus $742,463 in interest, pursuant to a Commission order 
at ANR Pipeline Company, 79 FERC para. 61,335 (1997).
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such protests 
should be filed on or before August 15, 1997. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21219 Filed 8-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.a

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Beaumont, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Clifford Wildes, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 
| Date: May 22, 2006 | */s/ Clifford Wildes*

Clifford Wildes, Chief Executive Officer |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 152 (Thursday, August 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20892]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 97-102]


NASA Advisory Council, Life and Microgravity Sciences and 
Applications Advisory Committee, Microgravity Research Advisory 
Subcommittee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Life and Microgravity 
Sciences and Applications Advisory Committee, Microgravity Research 
Advisory Subcommittee.

DATES: September 10, 1997, 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Room MIC-7, 
300 E Street, SW, Washington, DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Bradley M. Carpenter, Code UG, 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 
202-358-0813.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

--Program Status Report
--Status of the Microgravity Research Advisory Subcommittee 
Recommendations
--Program Planning Activities
--Structure and Function of the Microgravity Research Division Working 
Groups
--Informal Discussion

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: July 30, 1997.
Leslie M. Nolan,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-20892 Filed 8-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M