Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d and is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 10881 Su m m ar yC al endar
LA RRY B F RAS I ER , Pl ai nt i f f

- Appe l l ant
v. U N I TE D STAT ES , D efen da n t
- A pp el l ee

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e N ort h ernD i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 3: 08- C V

- 39
B e fo r e G A R Z A , C L E M E N T , a n dO W E N , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R IA M: * L a r r yB . F r a s ie ra p p e a ls th e d is tr ic t c o u r t’s d e n ia l o f h is p e tit io n fo ra w r it o f c o r am no bi s . I n M ar c h 2 00 2, Fr as i e rw as c o nvi ct ed by j u ry v e r di c to n f o ur cou n ts of i n com e taxev a sion a n d w a s sen ten ced to 3 7 m on th s of i m p ri son m en t, t hre e y ear s of

s upervi se d r el eas e, and $103, 438. 58 i n re st i t ut i on. Fra si erw as r e le a s e dfr o m p r is o n in M a y2 0 0 4 , a n dh is te r m o f s u p e rv is e dre le a s e e x p ir e din M ay 200 7. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D September

14, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 10881

2 O n a p p e a l, F r a s ie ra r g u e s t h a t: (1 ) th e m a g is tr a te ju d g e ’ s re fe r e n c e to a ll o f hi s i s s ue s ha vi ng al r e ad y be e n a ddr e s s e d i s no ts upp o r t e d b y t he r e c o r d; ( 2) t he di s t r i c tc o ur tfail e d t o m e nt i o n o rc o ns i de rhi s o bj e c t i o ns t o t he m agi st r at e j udge’ s r epo r t ; and ( 3) t he di st r i c t co urtfai l ed t o i ss ue fac t ual f i ndi ngs o rc o nc l us i o ns o f l aw as t o ea c h of

hi s cl ai m s . The r e c o r d s ho w s t hatt he d is t r ic tc o u r te x p li c it lyc o n s id e r e d F r a s ie r ’s o bje c t io n s to th e m a g is t r a t e ju d g e ’s
r epo r t . M or eo ver , be c ause t he m agi st r at e j udge’ s r ef er enc e ch a l l enged by Fr as i e rw as nott he pr i m ar y ba s i s fo rr e c o m m e ndi ng t hathi s pe t i t i o n b e de ni e d, t h i s c ou rtneed not c on si der t h at i ssue. Th e w r i tof

c or am nobi s, avail abl e pur suant28 U
. S. C
. § 1651( a) , sho ul d be em p l oy ed on l y to co rrect erro rs “of th e m ost fun d a m en tal ch a ra cter. ” Un i t ed S t ate s v. Dyer , 13 6 F. 3d 41 7, 42 2 ( 5t h Ci r . 1 99 8) (i nt e r nalq uo t at i o ns m ar ks a nd c ita tio n o m itt e d). “T h e w r it o f c o r a m n o b is is a n e x tr a o r d in a r yre m e d ya v a ila b le to ap e tit io n e rn o lo n g e rin cu s to d yw h o s e e k s to v a c a te a c r im in a l co n v ic tio n in ci rcum st an ces w h ere t h e petit i on er c an dem on st rat e civi ldi sabi l i t i es as a consequ en ce of

th e cr i m i n alconvi ct i on , an d that t h e chal l en gederr or i s of su ff i ci en t m a gn i tu d e to j u sti fy the ex trao rd i n a ryreli ef. ” Ji m e nezv. Trom i nski , 91 F. 3d 76 7, 76 8 ( 5t h Ci r . 19 96 )
. The w r i t w i l l i s s ue o nl y t o c o rrec terr ors resul t i n g i n a c o m pl et e m i scarr i age of j u st i ce, an d i s app ropri ate onl y w h en (a) n o oth er re m ed y i s a va i l a b l e a n d(b) w h en s ou n dre a son s ex i st f or fail u re to s e e ka p p r o p r ia te e a r lie rre lie f. Id
. Dyer , 136 F. 3d at422. F rasi er has n otsh ow n tha the i s experi en ci n g ad verse c on sequ en ces as a resul tof

hi s pri or f

ederalconvi ct i on such tha the i s entit l ed to t h e ext raordi n ary r e lie f th a t h e s e e k s . S ee Dyer , 136 F. 3da t4 29
. M o r e o ve r , he ha s no tm ad e t he nec es sa r y s how i ng of a c om pl et e m i sc ar r i age of j ust i c e bec ause t he c l ai m s t hat he r ai se s i n t he i nst antpet i t i on w er e a r gued, orc oul d have bee n ar gued, i n 28 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 5 m o tio n s . S ee Uni t e d St at e s v . Es ogb ue , 357 F
. 3d532 , 535 ( 5th C i r. 2 0 0 4 ). F rasi er m ay n otuse t h e w ri tt o overri de the ap pl i cabl e l i m i t ati on s peri odN o. 08- 10881

3 o rt o c ir c um ve ntt he s uc c e s s ive pe t i t i o n pr o vi s i o ns o f t he Ant i

- Ter r o r i s m a nd E ffe c tiv e D e a th P e n a ltyA c t. I d. A c c o r d in g ly , th e ju d g m e n t o f th e d is tr ic t c o u r t is A F F IR M E D
.