February 18, 2016

Exemption No. 12353A Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 1071

Mr. Benjamin Z. Smith

UAV Aviation Services Inc.

827 West Trindle Road Mechanicsburg

, PA 17005

Dear Mr. Smith :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions

and limitations.

By letter dated September 4, 2015 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

on behal f of UAV Aviation Services Inc. (hereinafter petitioner or op erator) for an amendment to yo ur current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulati ons (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data

collection . You requested an amendment to add the DJI Phantom 3 Advanced, DJI Phantom 3 Professional, SenseFly eBee, SenseFly eXom, and SenseFly Ag

.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. The unmanned aircraft authorized in the original grant are comparable in type, si ze, weight, speed and operating capabilities to those in this petition.

Airworthiness Certification

In accordance with the statutory criteria provided in Section 333 of Public Law 112

− 95 in

reference to 49 U.S.C. § 44704, and in consideration of the size , weight, speed, and limited2

operating area associated with the aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation has determined that this aircraft meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA

finds that relief from 14 CFR part 21, C e rtification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H

— Airworthiness Certificates , and any associated noise certification and testing requirements of part 36, is not necessary.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 12353 remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained

in 49 U.S.C

. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is granted an amendment to add new aircraft to its UAS operations.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

Conditions and Limitations

All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 12353 remain in effect except as follows. Condition No. 1 has been updated to reflect the additional aircraft.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the Hawkeye Mk

- III,

MD4

- 1000, MD4

- 3000

, DJI Phantom 3 Advanced, DJI Phantom 3 Professional, SenseFly eBee, SenseFly eXom, and SenseFly Ag when weighing less than 55 poun ds including payload. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this exemption.

This exemption terminates on A ugust 31 , 2017 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/ s/

John S. Duncan

Direc tor, Flight Standards Service