alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Employees, family, friends storm beach for Troop Support’s Family Day

By DLA Troop Support Public Affairs

                WILDWOOD, New Jersey  –              

Thousands of employees, family and friends soaked up the sun on the beach and boardwalk of Wildwood, New Jersey July 7 for Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support’s Family Day.

Employees and their guests spent the day at water parks and on amusement rides during the annual gathering. There were crafts for kids and an open buffet for lunch and dinner.

The Construction and Equipment supply chain earned the Family Day trophy through a series of games: musical chairs, dunk tank, a scavenger hunt and quizzo. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA Troop SupportFamily DayPeople and Culture
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and President and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AMC
Entertainment Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



Dated May 21, 2009/s/ GERARDO I. LOPEZ Gerardo I. Lopez
Chief Executive Officer, Director and President/s/ CRAIG R. RAMSEY Craig R. Ramsey
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


[A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AMC Entertainment Inc. and will be retained by AMC Entertainment Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

---



QuickLinks
No. 00-6792.

#### Tolley *v.*Moore, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
#### Louis BLACHER v. MATLACK, INC.

No. 60701.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 14, 1977.

In re: Louis Blacher applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, East Baton Rouge Parish. 349 So.2d 916.

Writ denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 HALIFAX CORPORATION CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO #18 U.S.C. 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 This Certification is intended to accompany the Report of Halifax Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the
requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. The undersigned, in his capacity as set forth below, hereby certifies, with respect
to the Report, that:  1
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/Joseph Sciacca
    
    Date: July 13, 2005Joseph SciaccaChief Financial Officer
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States code) and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### F. W. Myers Company, Inc. (F. H. Leggett & Co.) v. United States

No. 8120.

Entry Nos. A-6372; A-6495; A-6630.

First Division, Appellate Term

dated May 26, 1952)

*Marlow & Hines', John D. Rode,*associate counsel; for the appellant.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the appellee.

Before Oliver, Cole, and Mollison, Judges; Oliver, C. J., dissenting

ORDER

This case, as a review of *F. W. Myers Company, Inc. (F. H. Leggett & Co.)*v. *United States,*22 Cust. Ct. 368, Reap. Dec. 7646, was the subject of our decision in *Same*v. *Same,*27 Cust. Ct. 473, Reap. Dec. 8062. Later, and under timely motion for rehearing, our previous opinions (Neap. Dec. 8062, *supra)*were discussed in oral argument permitted to both sides.

*667During the course of the said argument; counsel for the respective parties agreed to supplement the testimony in the original record with new facts presented in this form:

> Mr. Atjstee: I am willing to stipulate for the purpose of this case that Mr. H. H. Ayer, General Traffic Manager, of the Canada Packers Limited, informed a Customs Agent on March 5, 1952, this month, that the prices of $1.05 per dozen tins, plus 8 per cent sales tax to wholesalers, and $1.30 per dozen tins, including 8 per cent sales tax to retailers, were maximum prices fixed by the Wartime Price and Trade Board and these maximum prices were not fixed by or controlled by Canada Packers Limited. Por the court’s information, I had a further investigation conducted to ascertain the facts. I have just read part of that report which just arrived only on March 12th. I am willing to stipulate that as facts in this case, if counsel will agree to it.

> Mb. Rode: I certainly will agree to it.

In view of the foregoing stipulation, presenting new and additional facts, we feel that the trial judge should have the benefit of the same for any reconsideration of previous findings that that court may deem advisable.

It is therefore Ordered that our decision, Eeap. Dec. 8062, *supra,*and the judgment attached thereto, he and the same are hereby vacated, and

It is Further Ordered that the judgment of the lower court be and the same is hereby reversed, and the case be remanded to the trial judge for a new trial.

DISSENTING MEMORANDUM

Oliver, Chief Judge:

Inasmuch as I filed a dissenting opinion in this case (Reap. Dec. 8062) and refrained from participating in the judgment pursuant to the majority opinion therein, I cannot consistently join in an order vacating said judgment and remanding the case to the trial judge for a new trial. I consider that the sales of the merchandise for consumption in Canada were made in a controlled market and, therefore, the proper basis of value should be export value, which was the entered value. Further, I fail to see wherein the stipulation, referred to in the order of the majority, adds any facts determinative of the law in this case.
Exhibit
      10.2

    


      

    
      11111
        Katy Freeway, Suite 910

      Houston,
        TX 77079

      (713)
        973-5720 tel

      (713
        973-5777 fax

       

    

    November
      13, 2007

    


    Mr.
      David
      Ames

    President
      and Chief Executive Officer

    Xethanol
      Corporation

    Avenue
      of
      the Americas

    New
      York,
      NY

    


    
      	Re:	
              Amendment
                No. 1 (“Amendment No. 1) to the Stock Purchase and Termination Agreement,
                dated October 5, 2007, by and between Xethanol Corporation, H2Diesel
                Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”) and H2Diesel, Inc. (“H2Diesel”), a wholly
                owned subsidiary of Holdings, (as amended, the “Termination
                Agreement”)

            


    

    


    Dear
      Mr.
      Ames:

    


    Please
      acknowledge your agreement that the Termination Agreement is amended as follows,
      by executing this Amendment No. 1 to the Termination Agreement in the space
      provided below:

    


    Section
      2.3 of the Agreement is hereby modified to change “November 9, 2007” to
“November 23, 2007.”

    


    Very
      truly yours,

    


    H2Diesel,
      Inc.

     

    
      
        	 	 
	By:  	/s/ David
                A.
                Gillespie  
	
                David
                  A. Gillespie

                President

              
	 

Acknowledged
        and Agreed as of the date above first written:

    

     

    
      
        	/s/
                David Ames  
	David
                Ames
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Understanding culture key to Asian, American progress  

By Beth ReeceDLA Public Affairs

                FORT BELVOIR, Virginia  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Equal Employment OpportunityPeople and Culture
Exhibit
      32.1





Certification
      Pursuant to


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


(as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906


of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
      connection with the quarterly report Royal Spring Water Inc. (the “Company”), on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned
      of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
      of
      their knowledge:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written certification has been provided to the Company and
      will
      be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
                Alex HazanName:
                Alex HazanTitle:
                Chief Executive OfficerJuly
                19, 2007/s/
                Harel GoldsteinName:
                Harel GoldsteinTitle:
                Chief Financial OfficerJuly
                19, 2007





This
      Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This exhibit is not “filed” for purposes of Section
      18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as provided
      by applicable rules of the Securities Exchange Commission.
----------------------------------------------------------------- Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCCQ-11-0000747 28-NOV-2011 12:29 PM

NO. SCCQ-11-0000747 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I BERT VILLON and MARK APANA, Plaintiffs,
vs. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., dba WAILEA MARRIOTT RESORT, Defendant.
RENELDO RODRIGUEZ and JOHNSON BASLER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,
vs. STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC.,

dba WESTIN MAUI RESORT & SPA, Defendant.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.) Upon consideration of the plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration of the November 8, 2011 ruling on the certified question, it appears that the motion for reconsideration -- filed on November 21, 2011 -- was not filed within 10 days after the filing of the November 8, 2011 ruling. See HRAP 40(a) ("A motion for reconsideration may be filed by a party only within 10 days after the filing of the opinion, dispositional order, or rulingunless by special leave additional time is granted during such period by a judge or justice of the appellate court involved."). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied as untimely. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, November 28, 2011. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

2
Exhibit 23.(a)

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-115006 and 333-132895 on Form SB-2 and
Registration Statement Nos. 33-6300, 33-19372, 33-38928, 33-38925, 33-86726, 333-14607, 333-29949,
333-85988, 333-99233, and 333-143557 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 18, 2008, pertaining to the consolidated financial statements
of MFIC Corporation which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/
UHY LLP

Boston,
Massachusetts
March 18, 2008

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael J. Degen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Nortech Systems Incorporated on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Nortech Systems Incorporated.

March 19, 2009

By:

/s/ MICHAEL J. DEGEN Michael J. Degen Chief Executive Officer
Nortech Systems Incorporated


I,
Richard G. Wasielewski, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Nortech Systems Incorporated on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Nortech Systems Incorporated.

March 19, 2009

By:

/s/ RICHARD G. WASIELEWSKI Richard G. Wasielewski Chief Financial Officer
Nortech Systems Incorporated


---



QuickLinks
#### George W. DuBREUIL, Appellant, v. James J. JAMES, Appellee.

No. 77-1433.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 13, 1977.

A. John Goshgarian and Howard J. Hoch-man, Miami, for appellant.

Papy, DuVal, Poole & Usich and Harvie S. DuVal, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before HUBBART and KEHOE, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Owens v. Smith,*154 So.2d 878, 881-882 (Fla.1st DCA 1963).
#### Kenneth E. HOAG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1141.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 14, 1978.

Richard W. Springer of Kohl, Springer & Springer, Palm Springs, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Harry M. Hipler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of *Dove v. State,*287 So.2d 384 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); *Darby v. State,*216 So.2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); *Taylor v. State,*199 So.2d 517 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967).

CROSS, DAUKSCH and LETTS, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                        9,106,695
<SECURITIES>                                  6,439,219
<RECEIVABLES>                                 6,691,381
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             22,237,295
<PP&E>                                          785,269
<DEPRECIATION>                                  477,748
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               42,628,404
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         3,864,325
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                     52,216,010
<OTHER-SE>                                  (15,717,005)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 42,628,404
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             15,824,073
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                11,415,428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             11,415,428
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               4,408,645
<INCOME-TAX>                                     87,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           4,321,645
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                  4,321,645
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.40
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1


                       CERTIFICATION OF THE PRESIDENT

                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    I, Ramon Chimelis, president, treasurer, and secretary, certify that the
forgoing quarterly report on Form 10-QSB containing the financial statements
set forth within fully comply with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)) and that
information contained in the quarterly report presents fairly, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Big
Sky Industries III, Inc.

Date: May 20, 2003                  /s/ Ramon Chimelis
                                    --------------------
                                    Ramon Chimelis
                                    President



<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             357
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,363
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (733)
<INVENTORY>                                        337
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   651
<PP&E>                                      11,712,298
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,771,262
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,763
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        235
<COMMON>                                       (7,914)
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,169)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,916
<SALES>                                         16,501
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,501
<CGS>                                           10,826
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,826
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,574
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,014
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,913)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,913)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.56)
        

</TABLE>