alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 150 (Tuesday, August 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20613]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of 
August 4, 1997.
    A closed meeting will be held on Thursday, August 7, 1997, at 10:00 
a.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4), (8), (9)(A) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a) 
(4), (8), (9)(i) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled 
matters at the closed meeting.
    Commissioner Wallman, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
August 7, 1997, at 10:00 a.m., will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions.
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact: the Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.

    Dated: July 31, 1997.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20613 Filed 7-31-97; 4:16 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
exv10wsw1



 






Exhibit 10-s-1




NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION SUMMARY




     Our non-employee directors receive a retainer at the rate of $100,000 per year for service on
our board of directors, payable in cash (in quarterly installments of $25,000 at the beginning of
each quarter). This structure is effective December 29, 2007 for existing directors and is
effective upon appointment for any new director (prorated as appropriate).



     Under the 2006 Long-Term Incentives Plan, which has been approved by our shareowners and
amended by the Board of Directors (the “Plan”), each director has the option each year to determine
whether to defer all or any part of the cash portion of his or her retainer by electing to receive
additional restricted stock units of our common stock valued at the Fair Market Value (as defined
in the Plan) on the date the cash portion of the retainer payment would otherwise be paid.



     Under the Plan, each non-employee director upon election as a director is granted an award of
restricted stock units of our common stock determined by dividing $200,000 by the Fair Market Value
on the date of such initial appointment. In addition, each non-employee director is granted an
award of restricted stock units of our common stock on an annual basis immediately after each
annual meeting of our shareowners beginning with the shareowners’ meeting following the first
anniversary of Board service. Such award is determined by dividing $100,000 by the Fair Market
Value on the date of the shareowners’ annual meeting.



     An Audit Committee annual fee is paid to the Audit Committee Chairman at a fixed annual rate
of $10,000 and the other Audit Committee members (excluding the Chairman) at a
fixed rate of $5,000 each to be paid in cash (quarterly in advance). Each Audit Committee
member (including the Chairman) has the option each year to determine whether to defer all or



 









 




any part of his or her Audit Committee annual fee by electing to receive additional restricted
stock units of our common stock valued at the Fair Market Value on the date the cash retainer
payment would otherwise be paid.
General Information Product 101

U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

Base boundary derived from 1:1,000,000 scale U.S. Geological Survey National Map 1:24,000

digital data, accessed 2010 at http://bpgeo.cr.usgs.gov/viewer.htm.

Image base mosaic produced from three 2.4-meter QuickBird© scenes. Date of collection January 15, 2010.

QuickBird data courtesy of DigitalGlobe, 2010.

This dataset has been geocorrected using orthorectified Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery in order to enhance spatial accuracy.

Multispectral Near Infrared (Band 4), Red (Band 3), and Green (Band 2) image composite shown.

In this infrared image, red identifies living vegetation. Water appears dark blue. Bare or sparsely vegetated areas look white.

Impervious (man-made) surfaces appear blue-gray.

UTM projection, Zone 18N, World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84).

1

Parallel, Inc., P.O. Box 281149, Lakewood, CO 80228.

2

USGS Rocky Mountain Geographic Science Center, P.O. Box 25046, MS-516, Denver, CO 80225.

Digital cartography by C.J. Cole, 2010.

Image base mosaic by C.J. Cole, 2010.

Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U. S. Government.

Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from individual copyright owners to reproduce any

copyrighted materials contained within this report.

Not for commercial use.

72°16'0"W

72°16'0"W

72°17'0"W

72°17'0"W

72°18'0"W

72°18'0"W

72°19'0"W

72°19'0"W

72°20'0"W

72°20'0"W

72°21'0"W

72°21'0"W

72°22'0"W

72°22'0"W

72°23'0"W

72°23'0"W

72°24'0"W

72°24'0"W

72°25'0"W

72°25'0"W

72°26'0"W

72°26'0"W

72°27'0"W

72°27'0"W

72°28'0"W

72°28'0"W

72°29'0"W

18°36'0"N

18°36'0"N

18°35'0"N

18°35'0"N

18°34'0"N

18°34'0"N

18°33'0"N

18°33'0"N

18°32'0"N

18°32'0"N

18°31'0"N

18°31'0"N

18°30'0"N

18°30'0"N

18°29'0"N

18°29'0"N

18°28'0"N

18°28'0"N

Dominican

Republic

Haiti

Carrefour

Port-au-Prince

Port-au-Prince Bay

Toussaint

L'Ouverture

Airport

Pétion-Ville

Frorse River

Momance River

© 2010 DigitalGlobe

Earthquake epicenter denoted by yellow circle. Epicenter data courtesy of the USGS Earthquake Hazards Program

(http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/us2010rja6.php). Image is 10-meter ALOS AVNIR-2, date of collection

January 13, 2010. UTM projection, Zone 18N, World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84).

© 2010 JAXA

0 1 2 4 6 8

Kilometers

0 0.5 1 2 3 4

Miles

Area of image

Satellite Map of Port-au-Prince, Haiti–2010–Infrared

By

Christopher J. Cole1

and Jeff Sloan2

2010
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries IV, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 2, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries IV, Inc.
#### OPINION OF THE JUSTICES.

No. 237.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 16, 1977.

To the Members of the

House of Representatives

State Capitol

Montgomery, Alabama 36130

Dear Sirs and Madam:

We acknowledge receipt of Senate Bill No. 422 concerning the authorization of the Governor, by Executive Order, to freeze or roll back utility rates established by the Alabama Public Service Commission.

After considering this request, we respectfully point out that this Court is re*1354stricted from issuing advisory opinions on legislation that has already been enacted by the legislature. *Opinion of the Justices,*264 Ala. 452, 88 So.2d 778 (1956). We take note that Senate Bill No. 422 has been enacted by the legislature and sent to the Governor for his signature.

Therefore, we respectfully decline to respond to the advisory opinion request.

Respectfully submitted,

C. C. TORBERT, JR., Chief Justice

JAMES N. BLOODWORTH

HUGH MADDOX

JAMES H. FAULKNER

RENEAU P. ALMON

JANIE L. SHORES

ERIC EMBRY

SAM A. BEATTY

Associate Justices
#### Leon GREEN and Gertrude Gerber, Appellants, v. Fred T. LANDRY, Appellee.

No. 76-1263.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 14, 1977.

Ainslee R. Ferdie, Coral Gables, for appellants.

Joseph I. Davis, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *McAllister Hotel, Inc. v. Porte,*98 So.2d 781 (Fla.1957); *Zaydon*v. *Wilder,*305 So.2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); *Fenton v. Bancroft Hotel Associates, Inc.,*265 So.2d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972).
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Land and Maritime’s workforce training strengthens lifecycle logistics initiatives

By DLA Land and MaritimeDLA Land and Maritime

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 17 (Monday, January 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 3896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2006]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 11:11 a.m. on 
Tuesday, January 21, 1997, the Board of Directors of the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters 
relating to the Corporation's Corporate, supervisory and personnel 
activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice 
Chairman Andrew C. Hove, Jr., seconded by Director Joseph H. Neely 
(Appointive), concurred in by Director Nicolas P. Retsinas (Director, 
Office of Thrift Supervision), Director Eugene A. Ludwig (Comptroller 
of the Currency), and Chairman Ricki Helfer, that corporation business 
required its consideration of the matters on less than seven days' 
notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was 
practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of 
the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the 
matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of 
subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8) and (c)(9)(A)(ii) of the 
``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), 
(c)(6), (c)(8) and (c)(9)(A)(ii)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550 17th Street NW., Washington, DC.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

    Dated: January 21, 1997.
Valerie J. Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2006 Filed 1-23-97; 11:34 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20630]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[30 Day-18-97]


Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) publishes a 
list of information collection requests under review by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these requests, call 
the CDC Reports Clearance Office on (404) 639-7090. Send written 
comments to CDC, Desk Officer; Human Resources and Housing Branch, New 
Executive Office Building, Room 10235; Washington, DC 20503. Written 
comments should be received within 30 days of this notice.

Proposed Project

    1. Sun Protection for Children--New--Skin cancer is of increasing 
public health concern because of its increasing incidence. Ultraviolet 
radiation is the primary risk factor for skin cancers, and the risk of 
skin cancer appears to be increased with early life exposures to 
ultraviolet radiation. However, little information is available on sun 
protection for children. Therefore, the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, 
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, intends to conduct a survey 
on sun protection for children to monitor sun protection behaviors, 
develop health messages, and target populations for health education as 
part of the National Skin Cancer Prevention Education Program.
    A representative sample of parents of children aged 6 months to 10 
years, selected by random digit dialing, will be interviewed over the 
telephone. The information collected will include demographic 
information, parental knowledge and attitudes about skin cancer and sun 
protection, and sun protection for their children. The total annual 
burden hours are 2,594.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Average  
                                    Number of    Number of     burden/  
           Respondents             respondents   responses/    response 
                                                 respondent   (in hours)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Screening Interview..............       25,500            1       0.0833
Main Survey......................        1,125            1        .4166
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: July 30, 1997.
Wilma G. Johnson,
Acting Associate Director for Policy Planning And Evaluation, Centers 
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 97-20630 Filed 8-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-5130 STANLEY C. SPERLING and RUTH A. SPERLING, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v. UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in 02-CV-1523, Judge Lawrence J. Block. ON MOTION 

### ORDER The appellants move without opposition for a 6-day extension of time, until April 21, 2009, to file their response to the court's November 7, 2008 order. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT

APR 17 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv Date

cc: Sallie W. Gladney, Esq. Deborah K. Snyder, Esq. s20 Jan Horbaly Clerk 

# uAttitalhrt
APR 17 2009 IAN HORBALY CUM
No. 00-6632.

#### Barnett *v.*Fanello, Warden.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Howard A. KIDDER v. BOB ANDERSON AND CAPITAL CITY PRESS, INC.

No. 59988.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 17, 1977.

In re: BOB ANDERSON AND CAPITAL CITY PRESS, INC. applying for cer-tiorari, or review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 345 So.2d 922.
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Lee Max HYDER, Respondent.

No. 50493.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 15, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 6, 1977.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for petitioner.

Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, and Dan P. Brawley and Robert H. Grizzard, II, Asst. Public Defenders, Bartow, for respondent.

KARL, Justice.

This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, in *Hyder v. State,*reported at 338 So.2d 847 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), which conflicts directly with *State ex rel. Williams v. Eastmoore,*297 So.2d 572 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), and *O’Bryan v. State,*326 So.2d 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), certiorari denied 336 So.2d 602 (Fla.1976).

*57We are confronted here with the identical question as that raised in *State v. Bassham,*Fla., 352 So.2d 55, filed September 15, 1977, whether a detainer placed by one county for a prisoner held by another county is considered custody within the contemplation of the speedy trial rule from which time speedy trial time commences to run.

For the reasons stated in *State v. Bass-ham, supra,*the decision of the District Court in the instant case is quashed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ENGLAND, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


             [BROUSSARD, POCHE, LEWIS & BREAUX, L.L.P. LETTERHEAD]





                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTS AUDITORS

As Independents Auditors, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in
this Form 10-K of American Bancorp, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998 of our report dated January 31, 2001, which appears on Pages 28
through 58 of the annual report to shareholders.


                                    /s/ BROUSSARD, POCHE, LEWIS & BREAUX, L.L.P.



Lafayette, Louisiana
January 31, 2001
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1814 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1814

 To amend title XXVIII of the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize 
       certain provisions relating to public health preparedness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 7, 2011

Mrs. Gillibrand introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XXVIII of the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize 
       certain provisions relating to public health preparedness.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Disaster Medical System 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS RELATING TO PUBLIC HEALTH 
              PREPAREDNESS.

    Section 2812 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300hh-11) 
is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(3), by adding at the end the 
        following:
                    ``(D) Administration.--The Secretary may determine 
                and pay claims for reimbursement for services under 
                subparagraph (A) directly or by contract providing for 
                payment in advance or by way of reimbursement.''; and
            (2) in subsection (g), by striking ``such sums as may be 
        necessary for each of the fiscal years 2007 through 2011'' and 
        inserting ``$56,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2012 through 
        2016''.
                                 <all>
```
June 14, 1951

No. 55669.

Suit 4652.

#### American Express Co. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1249 reversed May 8, 1951. C. A. D. 456.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6428

WARREN SCOTT TAYLOR, Petitioner - Appellant, versus H. D. BROWN, Page County Magistrate Judge, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-01-912-7) Submitted: April 26, 2002 Decided: July 15, 2002 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Warren Scott Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Warren Scott Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Taylor v. Brown , No. CA-01-912-7 (W.D. Va. Feb. 14, 2002; Feb. 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED