alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Michael Offerman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Form 10-QSB of IEH Corporation.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, is made known to me by others within the
company, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared; and

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) Presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: January 31, 2007

/s/ Michael Offerman
--------------------
Michael Offerman
President (Principal Executive Officer)

                                       27
Exhibit 99




             REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
             -------------------------------------------------------



Board of Directors and Stockholders
WVS Financial Corp.

We have reviewed the  accompanying  consolidated  balance sheet of WVS Financial
Corp. and  subsidiary as of December 31, 2006,  the related  statement of income
for the three-month and six-month  periods ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the
consolidated  statement  of changes in  stockholders'  equity for the  six-month
period ended December 31, 2006, and the consolidated statement of cash flows for
the  six-month  periods  ended  December  31,  2006 and  2005.  These  financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted  our reviews in  accordance  with  standards of the Public  Company
Accounting  Oversight  Board  (United  States).  A review of  interim  financial
information consists principally of applying analytical  procedures to financial
data and making  inquiries of persons  responsible  for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
the objective of which is the  expression of an opinion  regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying  financial  statements referred to above for them to
be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously  audited,  in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting  Oversight Board (United States),  the consolidated  balance sheet of
WVS Financial Corp as of June 30, 2006, and the related consolidated  statements
of income,  changes in  stockholders'  equity,  and cash flows for the year then
ended  (not  presented  herein),  and in our  report  dated  July 28,  2006,  we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.




/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

Wexford, PA
January 31, 2007


                                      E-5
#### Charles D. HYLAND, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation, Respondent.

No. 76-1739.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 28, 1977.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Frank B. Kessler, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

MOORE, Judge.

This is an appeal which concerns the admissibility of a tape recorded conversation of appellant and a co-defendant made without their knowledge while they were confined in a police car. Appellant and his co-defendant were arrested on a charge of burglary and placed in a police vehicle. Unbeknown to the appellant and his co-defendant was the fact that their conversation was being recorded without their express permission.

The facts of this case are identical to those which this court considered in *Brown v. State,*349 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977), wherein we affirmed the admission of such a tape recording. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence imposed herein are

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of MFIC Corporation (the Company) on Form10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer ofthe Company does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|                         | By:    | /s/  Dennis P. Riordan                   |   |
|------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         | Name:  | Dennis  P. Riordan                            |
|                         | Title: | Controller                                    |
|                         |   | (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|                         |   |                                          |
| Dated:   April 29, 2005 |   |                                          |

 

----
HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43905 1984
HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43906 1984
HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43907 1984
HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43908 1984
HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43909 1984
HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43910 1984
HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43911 1984
HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43912 1984
HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43913 1984
HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43914 1984
HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43915 1984
HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43916 1984
HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43917 1984
EXHIBIT
31.1





Certification





I,
Thomas F. Gibney, certify that:





1.          
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Hometown Bancorp,
Inc.;





2.          
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.          
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4.          
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:





(a)         Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)        
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)        
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.          
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)        
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b)        
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:
March 31, 2008





/s/ThomasF.GibneyThomas F. GibneyPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer andDirector
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         342,631
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               342,631
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,321,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,582
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (34,177,462)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,321,519
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,426
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,179,027
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,320,842
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,420,443)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,420,443)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,420,443)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Beatrice Strain CALAMIA v. James N. COYNE, Clarence A. Knight and Travelers Indemnity Co. of America.

No. 60604.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 14, 1977.

In re: Beatrice Strain Calamia applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, St. Tammany Parish. 349 So.2d 956.

Writ denied.
No. 45376.

#### Protests 47557-K, etc., of S. Alioto & Sons et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Locatelli*v. *United States*(T. D. 48284) the protests were sustained.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2409 

To suspend temporarily the duty on lightweight digital camera lenses 

measuring approximately 10 mm or more. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on lightweight digital 

camera lenses measuring approximately 10 mm or more. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIGHTWEIGHT DIGITAL CAMERA LENSES MEAS4 URING APPROXIMATELY 10 MM OR MORE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2409 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Lenses designed for digital 

cameras, the foregoing with a 

focal length measuring approximately 10 mm or more 

but not over 24 mm and 

weighing between 455 and 

465 g (provided for in subheading 9002.11.90) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
----

Form 10KSB/A Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) 

I, Hanqiao Zheng, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, asadopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based upona review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31,2007 of the Registrant (the "Report"): 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Registrant. 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by theRegistrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request. 

SIGNATURE

Date: June 20, 2008 

/s/Hanqiao Zheng ------------------------- Hanqiao Zheng President, Chairman of Board of Directors 

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

November 16, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00735

- CR

Porucha Denise PHILLIPS, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR9222A The Honorable Laura Lee Parker, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

A trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal has been filed in this appeal. The trial court judge has certified that the underlying criminal case “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Therefore, we ORDER the trial court clerk to file an electronic clerk’s record within TEN DAYS from the date of this order containing the following documents:

1. all pre

- trial orders and the related pre

- trial motions;

2. the C ourt’s Admonishments, the defendant’s Waiver, Consent to Stipulation of Testimony, and any other stipulations, and all other documents relating to the defendant s plea bargain;

3. the Judgment;

4. all post

-

judgment motions and orders;

5. the Notice of Appeal;

6. the T rial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal; and

7. the Criminal Docket Sheet.We DIRECT the clerk of this court to send a copy of this order to the attorneys of record,

the trial court clerk, and the court reporter(s) responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this appeal.

All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 16th day of Novembe r, 2017

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 23

 

Independent Auditors’ Consent

 

The Board of Directors 

Amtech Systems, Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-09917,333-10117 and 333-47098) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-09911, 333-09909 and 333-46086) on Form S-8 of Amtech Systems, Inc. of our report dated December 12, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Amtech Systems, Inc. as of September 30,2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years ended September 30, 2003, which report appears in the September 30, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of AmtechSystems, Inc. 

 

Our report dated December 12, 2003 states that the consolidatedfinancial statements of Amtech Systems, Inc. as of September 30, 2001 and for the year then ended were audited by auditors who have ceased operations. Those auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements beforethe revisions described in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements. As described in Note 1, these consolidated financial statements have been revised to include the transitional disclosures required by Statement of Financial AccountingStandards (SFAS) No. 142, *Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets*, which was adopted by the Company as of October 1, 2002. In our opinion, the disclosures for fiscal year 2001 in Note 1 are appropriate. Also, as described in Note 1, the Companyreclassified certain identifiable research and development costs from costs of sales to research and development expenses during the year ended September 30, 2003, and accordingly, the amounts relating to the fiscal years ending 2002 and 2001 wererestated to conform to the fiscal year 2003 presentation. We audited the adjustments that were applied to restate the research and development expenses reflected in the fiscal year 2001 consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, suchadjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. However, we were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the fiscal year 2001 consolidated financial statements of Amtech Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries other than withrespect to such adjustments. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Phoenix, Arizona 

December 23, 2003
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

________________________________

)

DAVONTA MELVIN ROWLAND, )

) 

 Plaintiff, )

 )

 v. ) Civil Action No. 14-0031 (EGS)

 )

UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, ) 

)

 Defendant. )

________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Defendant removed this action from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia and 

has moved to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Def.’s Mot. 

to Dismiss Compl. [Dkt. # 2]. Plaintiff has filed a motion to strike, which is liberally construed 

as his response [Dkt. # 5], and defendant has filed a reply [Dkt. # 6]. Plaintiff sues the United 

States Supreme Court for $18 billion. The complaint is vague and disjointed but plaintiff seems 

to complain about the Supreme Court’s treatment of one of his cases that was dismissed by this 

court. 

To the extent that the complaint is against the Justices of the Supreme Court, the Supreme 

Court’s Clerk, or other Supreme Court employees, which is the only plausible reading, defendant 

correctly argues that it is shielded from this suit by absolute judicial immunity. See Sindram v. 

Suda, 986 F.2d 1459, 1460 (D.C. Cir. 1993) (holding that “clerks, like judges, are immune from 

damage suits for performance of tasks that are an integral part of the judicial process”) (citations 

omitted). Hence, defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted. A separate order accompanies this 

Memorandum Opinion. 

SIGNED: EMMET G. SULLIVAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DATE: April 1, 2014
From : "Bober, Katarzyna" <Katarzyna.Bober@Honeywell.com>

To: Margaret Sheppard/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 01/11/2010 02:01 PM Subject: 1234ze SNAP applications Dear Margaret, Wh en we talked on the phone the other day, you mentioned that you’re p utting together a com pendium of approved substitutes for R- 22 and 142b that will be published in the Federal Register. You asked whether Honeywell is considering any other foam blowing uses for HFO 1234ze that we have not applied for yet. I consulted the business and this is the response I got: Absolutely !! Ultimately I’d like to see it approved for all foam uses, but here’s m y list of priority Integral Skin Foam – should not have significantly higher emission profile than already approved application s. Polyolefin foam – should have same emission profile as XPS, which was approved. Rigid polyurethane and polyisocyanurate laminated Boardstock – should have similar emission profile to other polyurethane foams already approved Rigid polyurethane slabstock and other – should have similar emission profile to other polyurethane foams already approved PS Sheet – This is likely to be 100% emissive at point of manufacture, so we may need to do som e calculations. It is unlikely that we would get any actual plant trial data any time soon. Flexible foam - This is likely to be 100% emissive at point of manufacture, so we may need to do som e calculations. It is unlikely that we would get any actual plant trial data any time soon. Phenolic Insulation Board – should have similar emission profile to other polyurethane foams already approved Could you please let me know how we should proceed to get these uses added to our list? Thank you, Kasia