alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1115 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1115

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow Indian tribes to 
             receive charitable contributions of inventory.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2005

 Ms. Murkowski (for herself and Mr. Johnson) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow Indian tribes to 
             receive charitable contributions of inventory.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS OF INVENTORY TO INDIAN TRIBES.

    (a) In General.--Section 170(e)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to special rule for contributions of inventory and other 
property) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(D) Special rule for indian tribes.--
                            ``(i) In general.--For purposes of this 
                        paragraph, an Indian tribe (as defined in 
                        section 7871(c)(3)(E)(ii)) shall be treated as 
                        an organization eligible to be a donee under 
                        subparagraph (A).
                            ``(ii) Use of property.--For purposes of 
                        subparagraph (A)(i), if the use of the property 
                        donated is related to the exercise of an 
                        essential governmental function of the Indian 
                        tribal government (within the meaning of 
                        section 7871), such use shall be treated as 
                        related to the purpose or function constituting 
                        the basis for the organization's exemption.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2005.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
      10.2

     

    AMENDENT
      TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

    


    This
      AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”), dated as of October 1,
      2007, is made between theglobe.com, inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”)
      and Michael S. Egan (“Executive”) and amends certain provisions of the
      Employment Agreement dated as of August 1, 2003 by and between the Company
      and
      Executive.

    


    WHEREAS,
      because of the Company’s current lack of cash resources and weak financial
      condition, the Company cannot continue to pay Executive’s minimum guaranteed
      annual bonus and Executive agrees that the Company is terminating its obligation
      to do so. Executive’s Employment Agreement is amended as described
      below.

    


    AMENDENT

    


    Section
      5. (a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended so as to irrevocably
      terminate the Company’s obligation to pay a minimum guaranteed annual bonus (the
“Guaranteed Bonus”) of $50,000 to Executive. Such termination applies to the
      guaranteed bonus otherwise earned for fiscal year 2007 (and otherwise payable
      on
      December 31, 2007) and guaranteed bonuses otherwise earned and payable for
      all
      succeeding fiscal years during the remaining term of the Executive’s Employment
      Agreement.

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on the date first
      above written.

     

    
      	 	theglobe.com, inc.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 /s/
              Robin Segual Lebowitz
	 	 	Robin Segual Lebowitz
Vice President -
              Finance
	 	 	 
	 	Executive
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
              Michael S. Egan
	 	 	
              Michael
                S. Egan
#### NATHANS v. BINGHAM.

April 5, 1836.

*Demurrer.*

The proviso or exception in the statute of limitations (act of the 27th of March 1713, sect. 5) relative to persons who are absent “ beyond the sea.” does not extend to *defendants;*who may therefore plead the statute, although they may have *been*beyond seas during the time which constitutes, under the statute, a bar to the action.

THIS was an action on the case brought by Jacob Nathans against William Bingham, to recover damages for a malicious prosecution, alleged to have been instituted in 1826 by the present defendant against the plaintiff. Tire pleas were, the general issue and the statute of limitations. To the *first*the plaintiff joined issue ; to the second plea (not guilty within six years) lie replied, the *absence of the defendant*in parts beyond the sea, viz. in Montreal, Upper Canada, from the time of the accruing of the cause of action laid in the *narr.*to (he institution of tin’s suit. Tire replication contained six distinct heads, but the facts laid in each were substantially the same. The defendant demurred, both specially as to the form of the replication, and generally to its substantial sufficiency in law.

The argument of the special demurrer was postponed, and its consideration was ultimately waived by the court.

*Bhhuy, Jun.,*(with whom were D. *P, Broten, J. R. IngersoU*and Sergioid) in suppuit of the general demurrer,

contended, that the *exception*in the statute of limitations (act of March 27, 1713, sect. *5, Pun!. Dig.*,582, *tJit. of*1830) relied on by the plaintiff in his replication, (ltd net embrace tire case of the *defendant’s*absence “ beyond the sea,” but was confined to that of the plaintiff’s. He cited ; Hall *165
      *v.*Wybouro, *Carth,*136; S, C., *2 Salk.*420; Cheevely *v.*Bond, *Carth.*226 ; S. C., 1 *Show.*341; Schlosser *v.*Lesher, 1 *Dali.*411, and was stopped by the court.

*Hirst*and *C. J. Ingersoll,*for plaintiff.

The Court on this day ordered *judgment*for the defendant on the general demurrer.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2393 

To suspend temporarily the duty on celery extracted oleoresin. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. CARDIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on celery extracted 

oleoresin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CELERY EXTRACTED OLEORESIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Celery extracted oleoresin 

(CAS No. 8015–90–5) (provided for in subheading 

3301.90.10) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2393 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of the Claim of George C. Vore, Respondent, v Allied Bendix Corporation et al., Appellants. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

[611 NYS2d 681]

White, J.

Appeals from two decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 28, 1991 and August 5, 1992, which, *inter alia,*ruled that claimant sustained a compensable injury and awarded workers’ compensation benefits.

Prior to July 1, 1974, an employee could not be awarded compensation under the Workers’ Compensation Law for a partial disability due to silicosis or other dust disease (Workers’ Compensation Law former § 39). On that date, this limitation was lifted provided the employee had been exposed to silica or other harmful dust for a period of at least six months in New York employment on or after July 1, 1974 (L 1974, ch 577, §§ 3, 6).

In this instance, the Workers’ Compensation Board sustained an award of compensation to claimant predicated on its finding that he is partially disabled as a result of asbestosis that was contracted while at his employment at Allied Bendix Corporation. The record establishes, however, that claimant left Allied Bendix in 1967 and was not exposed to asbestos at his subsequent place of employment. Therefore, as it is axiomatic that an administrative agency may exercise only those powers conferred by the Legislature *(see, Matter of Beer Garden v New York State Liq. Auth.,*79 NY2d 266, 276; *Matter of Shankman v Axelrod,*73 NY2d 203), the award of compensa*762tion to claimant must be set aside because the Board lacked the statutory authority to render it in light of the fact that claimant’s last exposure to asbestos was in 1967 *(see, Matter of Valk v Hudson Cement,*140 AD2d 835, 836). Although none of the parties addressed this issue, their silence cannot abrogate the intent of the Legislature. Accordingly, we reverse.

Cardona, P. J., Casey, Weiss and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decisions are reversed, without costs, and claim dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 147 (Thursday, July 31, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 40949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20165]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96-151; RM-8808, RM-8891]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Bear Creek and Pocono Pines, PA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Keymarket of NEPA, Inc., 
allots Channel 290A at Pocono Pines, Pennsylvania, as the community's 
first local aural transmission service (RM-8891). We also deny the 
proposal filed by Victor A. Michael, Jr., requesting the allotment of 
Channel 290A at Bear Creek, PA (RM-8808). See 61 FR 43033, August 20, 
1996. Channel 290A can be allotted to Pocono Pines in compliance with 
the Commission's minimum distance separation requirements with a site 
restriction of 13.1 kilometers (8.2 miles) northwest to avoid short-
spacings to the licensed and construction permit sites of Station 
WNWK(FM), Channel 290B1, Newark, New Jersey. The coordinates for 
Channel 290A Pocono Pines are North Latitude 41-09-17 and West 
Longitude 75-35-52. Since Pocono Pines is located within 320 kilometers 
(200 miles) of the U.S.-Canadian border, concurrence of the Canadian 
government has been obtained. With this action, this proceeding is 
terminated.

DATES: Effective September 8, 1997. The window period for filing 
applications for Channel 290A at Pocono Pines, Pennsylvania, will open 
on September 8, 1997, and close on October 9, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 96-151, adopted July 16, 1997, and 
released July 25, 1997. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Service, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC 
20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Sections 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 
154, as amended.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under 
Pennsylvania, is amended by adding Pocono Pines, Channel 290A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-20165 Filed 7-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### J. C. BENEFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1198.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 21, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 18, 1977.

*57John D. Demmi, Michael L. Kinney, and Richard A. Lazzara, Tampa, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

After jury trial appellant was found guilty on two counts of bribery, one count in violation of Section 838.01, Florida Statutes (1973), and the other count in violation of Section 838.015, Florida Statutes (1975), both of which are third-degree felonies. He was sentenced to a ten-year term of imprisonment with credit for time served in jail awaiting trial.

The points relied upon by appellant for reversal have been carefully considered in the light of the record and briefs, and we hold no reversible error has been made to appear. It is necessary, however, for the case to be remanded to the trial court for correction of appellant’s sentence. It is apparent from our reading of the colloquy at the sentencing hearing that the trial court intended to impose the maximum sentence available, i. e., five-year consecutive sentences on the charged offenses1 which, we submit, would have been proper. The judgment and sentence rendered in this case shows that the trial court did not carry out his expressed intention, but imposed a single general sentence, which is improper. *Darden v. State,*306 So.2d 581 (Fla.2d DCA 1975). *See also Darden v. State,*330 So.2d 750 (Fla.2d DCA 1976).

Therefore, the convictions are affirmed, but the general sentence is vacated. The case is remanded for resentencing in order that the judgment and sentence may reflect the imposition of sentence announced by the trial court in open court. It is not necessary that appellant be present in court for this purpose.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and GRIMES and OTT, JJ., concur.

1

. Sec. 775.082(3)(d), Fla.Stat. (1975) provides that the maximum prison sentence for a third degree felony is five years.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 152 (Thursday, August 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42516-42520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20795]



[[Page 42516]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary
[Transmittal No. 97-26]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: The Department of Defense, Defense Security Assistance Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of P.L. 104-164 dated 21 July 
1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. J. Hurd, DSAA/COMPT/CPD, (703) 604-6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 97-26, with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and sensitivity of technology.

    Dated: August 1, 1997.
L. M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
      

[[Page 42517]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07AU97.004



[[Page 42518]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07AU97.005



[[Page 42519]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07AU97.006



[[Page 42520]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07AU97.007



[FR Doc. 97-20795 Filed 8-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-C
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THERMEDICS INC.'S
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 2, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                                 81,950
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          47,733
<ALLOWANCES>                                            2,850
<INVENTORY>                                            40,958
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      254,438
<PP&E>                                                 33,838
<DEPRECIATION>                                         22,484
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        408,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  70,606
<BONDS>                                                47,552
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                4,174
<OTHER-SE>                                            243,953
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          408,483
<SALES>                                               208,644
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      208,644
<CGS>                                                 114,222
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         114,222
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       12,902
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          610
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      1,777
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        28,292
<INCOME-TAX>                                           10,688
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    14,939
<DISCONTINUED>                                          4,074
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         4,597
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           23,610
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.55


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      23




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





To
      The
      Board of Directors and Stockholders


Investors
      Title Company


Chapel
      Hill, North Carolina





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement No.
      333-33903 of Investors Title Company (the “Company”) and Subsidiaries on Form
      S-8 of our report dated March 9, 2007, with
      respect to the consolidated financial statements of Investors Title Company,
      management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
      reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
      which reports appear in Investors Title Company’s 2006 Annual Report on Form
      10-K.





Our
      audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our
      aforementioned report also included the financial statement schedules of the
      Company, listed in item 15. These financial statement schedules are the
      responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
      opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedules,
      when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements
      taken
      as a whole, present fairly in all material respects, the information set forth
      herein.





/s/
      Dixon Hughes PLLC




Dixon
        Hughes PLLC
 High
        Point, North Carolina
 March
        9,
        2007
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 15 (Wednesday, January 23, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 3973]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1018]



[[Page 3973]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health


Final Effect of Designation of a Class of Employees for Addition 
to the Special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice 
concerning the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a class of 
employees at Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation (NUMEC) in 
Apollo, Pennsylvania, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort 
(SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation 
Program Act of 2000. On November 29, 2007, as provided for under 42 
U.S.C. 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of 
employees as an addition to the SEC:

    Atomic Weapons Employer (AWE) employees who were monitored or 
should have been monitored for exposure to ionizing radiation while 
working at the Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation (NUMEC) 
in Apollo, Pennsylvania from January 1, 1957, through December 31, 
1983, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days 
or in combination with work days within the parameters established 
for one or more other classes of employees in the Special Exposure 
Cohort.

    This designation became effective on December 29, 2007, as provided 
for under 42 U.S.C. 7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on December 29, 
2007, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this 
notice, became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Elliott, Director, Office of 
Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 
45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). 
Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0b44484a584b484f48254c445d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="541b171507141710177a131b02">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 15, 2008.
John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
 [FR Doc. E8-1018 Filed 1-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-17-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 00-6020.

#### Jones *v.*Illinois.

Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.
No. 92-1587.

#### Michigan *v.*Davis.

Sup. Ct. Mich. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *informa pauperis*granted. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 23    Consents of Independent Public Accountants

G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
Certified Public Accountant
                                                330 E. Warm Springs
                                                Las Vegas, NV 89119
                                                       702.528.1984
                                                425.928.2877 (efax)





November 14, 2001


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of G. Brad Beckstead, CPA, consents to the inclusion of my
report   of  November  14,  2001,  on  the  Consolidated  Financial
Statements  of  Media and Entertainment.com,  Inc.  for  the  three
months  and  nine months ending September 30, 2001, in any  filings
which are necessary now or in the near future to be filed with  the
US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Signed,

/s/G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
----------------------------
G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
No. 99-7811.

#### Banda *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.