Leland C. , “Zeke”, Hurd, II

249 Lyell Ave ; PO Bx #4 Spencerport, NY 14559

U. S. Department of Transportation Jan 20, 2016 Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE Washington, DC 20590

Subject: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations form 14 C.F.R. Part 21, 45.27(a), 45.29(3) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h), 61.113 (a) & (b), 91.103, 91.119, 91,121, 91.203, 91.151. Following the format of FAA Exemption No. 11138

- Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2014

-0481, information I have included: 1) Supplemental Response for Petition 2) Phantom 3 Operator Manu al link; www.dji.com/product/phantom

- 3/downloads 3) Personal protocols and controls

-Sa fety/Flight concern 4) “Private Pilot Airplane Single Engine Land” Certificate #2206884/ with Instrument Airplane Rating, issued 01

- 24

-78. Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, I, Leland C. , “Zeke” , Hu rd, II, a licensed instrument rated pilot, (4000+ hours) and sole

- proprietor of Pegasus Environmental Company, preparing this exemption request myself, would like to apply for an exemption from the following Code of Federal Regulations, (C.F.R.), to be all owed commercial operationof lightweight Unmanned Aircraft Syst ems, (UAS) for aerial imaging, data collection, mapping,

agriculture crop inspection, building inspection, photography and aerial videos. During the past 3 years I have flown “hobby quads” for recreational purposes without incident. I have added the DJI Phantom 3 quad

- copter, (maximum gross weight, 3 pounds), equipped with four motor driven rotors powered via batteries; the UAS has a maximum speed of 30 knots and is equipped with a “Go

- Pro Gimba l” for ae rial imaging and remote sensing The requested exemption would permit operation of the ultra

- light UAS in predetermined areas sanctioned by the FAA as “safe to fly” areas under 400 feet AGL. This would allow for video and remote sensing imaging wit hin designated boundaries. All flights to be conducted under the rules and guidelines established via ATC and the FAA. Given the size , weight, speed and physical limited operating area associated with the UAS to be utilized, I am requesting exemption from 14CFRpart21, Subpart H,( Airworthiness Certificates) and #91.203 (a) and (b), (Certification required), subject to certain conditions and limitations, as is warranted and meets the requirements for an equivalent level of safety under 14CFR part 11 and Sect ion 333 of P.L. 112

-95, (Section 333). Furthermore I request an exemption from #45.23, (marking of the aircraft) because the UAS does not have cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which to mark certain words and, or phrases. Additionally, due to the very sma ll size of the UAS, there is not sufficient surface space for the two inch lettering requirement. The need for markings is understood. Thus every attempt will be made to place the word “Experimental” or assign various numbers deemed appropriate by the FAA, (#45.29(f)), to be visible to anyone assigned as a “spotter”. I also request an exemption from ##91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2) and 91417(a)and (b) . Maintenance inspections may be required and should be granted since they only apply to Aircraft wit h an “Airworthiness Certificate”. Yet, as a safety precaution, a “preflight inspection” will be performed of the UAS before each and every flight operation, as outlined in the UAS’ “operations manual”. Regarding UAS operational tra ining, as stated previous ly, I have 3+ years of experience performing numerous flights as a “hobbyist” simulating flights for future commercial use to gain familiarization of the UAS and it’s performance envelope under various weather and altitude conditions. In so doing, I have b uilt several small versions of this UAS and am an active member of the Academy of Model Aeronautics, (AMA). If granted this requested exemption, I agree to adhere to any and all additional safety procedures including but not limited to: 1) While airborne, keeping the UAS within a 1000 foot radius from the controller to aid in direct line of sight visual observation while constantly maintaining all VFR flight rules. 2) Operate the UAS within the flight time limitations as per the manufacturer’s recommended minimal level of battery power. 3) Operate the UAS within “visual line of sight”, (VLOS). 4) Use the global positioning system, (GPS) flight safety feature which enables the UAS to hover, then slowly land if communication is lost with the controller.5) Conduct all flight operations under my personal safety protocol including posting warning sign ; “Attention: Aerial Photography in Progress

– Remain Back 150 Feet”. 6) During all flight operations, analyzation of all data and other resources of information w ill constantly be observed to enhance and update all safety protocol 7) Be in contact with ALL respective airports and ATC for any operations within 5 miles of the FAA facilities for permission based on our estimated flight time, elevation and duration. 8) In th e event of unforeseen safety breaches or dangers, have an immediate plan to abort the mission. Aerial imaging for agricultural and environmental data collection via manned fixed wing and full scale helicopter platforms has been utilized for many years. Yet for many small business owners the ability to obtain the vast benefits gleaned from this scenario has been cost prohibitive . Granting the Petitioner’s exemptions will further the Public interest by allowing Pegasus Environmental to safely, efficiently and economically conduct aerial surveys and data collection. In addition, the use of UAS’s for these purposes will replace the older, conventional, expensive methods of aerial surveying and substantially reduce pollution and costs within the land and environm ental management industries. In conclusion; over the past s everal years, my extensive flight time, 4000+ hours, PIC, within the FAA regulatory guidelines has yielded the experience necessary for safe, legal, and p rudent UAV commercial operations.
Your timely consideration for granting the “333 exemption” is very most appreciated. Thank you. Sincerely,

Leland C. , “Zeke” , Hurd,II