" ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

111TH CONGRESS

1st Session 

REVIEW NO. 

09–2567 

OFFICE OF CONGRESSIONAL ETHICS 

UNITED STATES HOUSE OF 

REPRESENTATIVES 

————— 

Report and Findings 

Transmitted to the 

Committee on Standards of Official Conduct 

on June 8, 2009 

and released publicly pursuant to H. Res. 895 of the 

110th Congress as amended 

June 2009 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTSE:\Seals\Congress.#13
House of Representatives Office of Congressional Ethics Review No. 09–2567 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

54–330 

" ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

111TH CONGRESS

1st Session 

REVIEW NO. 

2009

09–2567 

OFFICE OF CONGRESSIONAL ETHICS 

UNITED STATES HOUSE OF 

REPRESENTATIVES 

————— 

Report and Findings 

Transmitted to the 

Committee on Standards of Official Conduct 

on June 8, 2009 

and released publicly pursuant to H. Res. 895 of the 

110th Congress as amended 

June 2009 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTSE:\Seals\Congress.#13
(II) 

OFFICE OF 

CONGRESSIONAL ETHICS 

BOARD 

UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS

DAVID SKAGGS, Chair 

PORTER GOSS, Co-Chair 

YVONNE BURKE 

KAREN ENGLISH 

ALLISON HAYWARD 

JAY EAGEN 

WILLIAM FRENZEL 

ABNER MIKVA 

Leo J. Wise, Chief Counsel & Staff Director 

Omar Ashmawy, Investigative Counsel 

Elizabeth Horton, Investigative Counsel 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS
(1) 

REPORT 

Review No. 09–2567 

The Board of the Office of Congressional Ethics, by a vote of no 

less than four members, on May 29, 2009 adopted the following report and ordered it to be transmitted to the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct of the U.S. House of Representatives. 

SUBJECT: Representative Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick 

NATURE OF THE ALLEGED VIOLATION: There is substantial 

reason to believe that Congresswoman Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick’s 

participation in the 13th Annual Caribbean Multi-National Business 

Conference in St. Maarten, N.A. from November 6–9, 2008, her acceptance of reimbursement of expenses to attend that conference 

and the Member Post Travel Disclosure Form she filed violated 

various provisions of House Rule XXV Section 5(b). 

RECOMMENDATION: The Board of the Office of Congressional 

Ethics recommends that the Committee on Standards of Official 

Conduct further review the above described allegations concerning 

Congresswoman Kilpatrick. 

VOTES IN THE AFFIRMATIVE: 6 

VOTES IN THE NEGATIVE: 0 

MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR STAFF DESIGNATED TO 

PRESENT THIS REPORT TO THE STANDARDS COMMITTEE: 

Leo Wise, Staff Director & Chief Counsel. 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS

steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS
(3) 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 5 

A. Summary of Allegation ..................................................................... 5 

B. A Note on Culpability ....................................................................... 6 

C. Jurisdictional Statement .................................................................. 7 

D. Procedural History ............................................................................ 7 

II. MULTIPLE ENTITIES, INCLUDING CARIB NEWS (THE NEWSPAPER), THE GOVERNMENT OF ST. MAARTEN AND SEVERAL 

CORPORATIONS, SPONSORED REPRESENTATIVE 

KILPATRICK’S TRIP ................................................................................ 8 

A. Representative Kilpatrick’s Knowledge of The Involvement of 

These Corporations in the Conference .......................................... 9 

B. CARIB NEWS also Sponsored Congresswoman Kilpatrick’s 

Travel .............................................................................................. 14 

C. Corporate Donations Were Earmarked for the Conference ........... 14 

D. Because Entities that Employ or Retain Lobbyists Sponsored 

the Event, Congresswoman Kilpatrick’s Involvement Should 

Have Been Limited to One Day .................................................... 20 

E. The Government of St. Maarten Made In-Kind Donations to 

the 2008 Conference and Played a Significant Role in Planning, Organizing and Conducting the 2008 Conference .............. 21 

III. ROLE OF THE CHAIR’S COUNSEL IN THE APPROVAL OF THE 

12TH ANNUAL CARIBBEAN MULTI-NATIONAL BUSINESS CONFERENCE IN 2007 .................................................................................... 24 

IV. THE VALUE OF THE TRIP REPORTED ON THE MEMBER’S POST– 

TRAVEL DISCLOSURE FORM ................................................................ 42 

A. Representatives from Carib News Foundation ............................... 43 

B. Information Required from the Congressional Traveler ................ 45 

V. MORE THAN ONE FAMILY MEMBER ACCOMPANIED CONGRESSWOMAN KILPATRICK ON THE TRIP ................................................... 47 

VI. CARIB NEWS FOUNDATION, AS A PRIVATE FOUNDATION, WAS 

PROHIBITED FROM PAYING FOR CONGRESSWOMAN 

KILPATRICK’S TRAVEL .......................................................................... 48 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS

steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS
(5) 

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CITATIONS TO LAW 

REVIEW NO. 09–2567 

On May 29, 2009 the Board of the Office of Congressional Ethics 

(hereafter the ‘‘Board’’ ) adopted the following findings of fact and 

accompanying citations to law, regulations, rules and standards of 

conduct (in italics ). The Board notes that these findings do not constitute a determination of whether or not a violation actually occurred. 

I. INTRODUCTON 

1. Congresswoman Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick attended the 13th

Annual Caribbean Multi-National Business Conference in St. 

Maarten, N.A., from November 6–9, 2008. Congresswoman Kilpatrick received funds from a private source to participate in the 

conference. 

A. SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS

2. There is substantial reason to believe that Congresswoman 

Kilpatrick violated the requirement that she identify the ‘‘true, correct and accurate’’ sponsor of her travel ‘‘to the best of her knowledge’’ on her Member Post Travel Disclosure Form. While forms 

submitted to her office and the Standards Committee before the 

conference identified one entity as the sponsor—the Carib News 

Foundation—once at the conference, Congresswoman Kilpatrick 

was presented with indications that other corporations—including 

Citigroup, IBM, AT&T, Pfizer, Macy’s and Verizon Foundation— 

were also sponsors. In fact, Representative Kilpatrick, in remarks 

at one of the conference sessions, personally thanked ‘‘the sponsors’’ 

after the corporations were identified as such. Those indications 

proved to be true—the corporations were in fact sponsors of Congresswoman Kilpatrick’s travel according to House travel rules because the corporations had donated funds specifically for the conference (i.e. earmarked funds). Further, events that occurred in 

2007 affected the Standards Committee’s ability to determine 

whether the corporations were sponsors in 2008: 

a. In 2007, the House of Representatives changed the rules 

governing travel. Those changes placed limitations on the number of days Members of Congress could participate in events 

(such as conferences) when their travel was sponsored by an 

entity that employs or retains a lobbyist. These changes affected the annual Caribbean Multi-National Business Conference. In 2007, the Carib News Foundation continued to 

identify the corporations as sponsors on the conference agenda 

and on a draft version of the Private Sponsor Travel Certification Form prepared for submission to the Standards Committee for approval. However, after interacting with the counVerDate Aug 31 2005 14:33 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 054330 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 P:\54-330\REVIEW~1\54-330.TXT 54-330

steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS
6 

sel to the then-Chair of the Standards Committee, and apparently without the knowledge of the staff attorney reviewing the 

trip, the documents identifying the corporations as ‘‘sponsors’’ 

were changed and their sponsorship was not disclosed. 

b. The 2007 conduct and attendant misrepresentations appear 

to have directly influenced what occurred in 2008. When the 

Carib News Foundation submitted materials to the Standards 

Committee for their approval of the 2008 conference, the Carib 

News Foundation took the same approach and did not disclose 

the role of the corporate sponsors on the forms they submitted 

to the Standards Committee. 

3. There is substantial reason to believe that Congresswoman 

Kilpatrick violated House Rule 25, clause 5(b)(1)(C) by accepting 

trip-related reimbursements from entities that employ or retain 

lobbyists for participating in an event for more than one day. 

4. There is substantial reason to believe that Congresswoman 

Kilpatrick violated House Rule 25 clause 5(h)(i)(1)(B) by underreporting the value of the travel reimbursements she received to 

attend the 13th Annual Caribbean Multi-National Business Conference. 

5. There is substantial reason to believe that Congresswoman 

Kilpatrick violated the limitation that a Member may only bring 

one family member with them on privately sponsored travel, described in the House Ethics Manual at page 101, by bringing both 

her daughter and granddaughter to the conference. The Board further notes that Congresswoman Kilpatrick failed to disclose that 

her daughter and granddaughter were accompanying her on the 

trip. 

6. There is substantial reason to believe that the Carib News 

Foundation’s payment of travel expenses for Representative Kilpatrick and her acceptance of payment violated the Internal Revenue Code. As stated above, Carib News Charities, the name previously held by the 501(c) organization now known as the Carib 

News Foundation, is listed as a private foundation in the Internal 

Revenue’s cumulative list of charitable organizations, Publication 

78. Therefore, the Standards Committee should not have approved 

the trip because the funds came from a prohibited source. 

B. A NOTE ON CULPABILITY

7. These findings fall into four categories: (1) the sponsor or 

sponsors, as the case appears to be, of the conference; (2) the intervention of the counsel to the former Chair of the Standards Committee in the Standards Committee’s review process of the conference in 2007 and how it affected the information before the 

Standards Committee in 2008; (3) the accuracy of the value of the 

reimbursement submitted by Congresswoman Kilpatrick and (4) 

whether, because of its tax status, the Carib News Foundation 

could lawfully pay for Congresswoman Kilpatrick’s conference-related expenses. 

8. While all these topics are relevant, the Board notes that they 

do not all involve conduct by Congresswoman Kilpatrick to the 

same degree. 

a. As to topic 1, determining the identity of the true sponsor 

or sponsors implicates the conduct of both Congresswoman KilVerDate Aug 31 2005 14:33 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 054330 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 P:\54-330\REVIEW~1\54-330.TXT 54-330

steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS
7 

1 House Resolution 895 of the 110th Congress, Section 1(e). 

patrick and the Standards Committee. Congresswoman Kilpatrick told the OCE she relied on the Standards Committee 

to make that determination. It is the Board’s view that the 

Member’s approach is reasonable to a point. Once Congresswoman Kilpatrick arrived at the conference, however, she was 

confronted with information that other corporations were cosponsors. That information, at least in 2008, does not appear 

to have been before the Standards Committee when they initially approved the 2008 travel. 

b. As to topic 2, the intervention of the counsel to the former 

Chair of the Standards Committee in the Standards Committee’s review of the 2007 conference did not involve Congresswoman Kilpatrick. Nonetheless, it directly bears on whether 

and to what extent the Standards Committee could determine 

the true sponsor of the conference in 2008. 

c. As to topic 3, the accuracy of the information Congresswoman Kilpatrick provided as to the value of the reimbursement of her conference-related expenses most directly implicates her conduct. The post-travel disclosure form that all 

Members must file when they accept privately sponsored travel 

is signed and certified by Members. The form puts the obligation on Members, not staff, not the Standards Committee and 

not sponsors, to certify that the information on the form is 

‘‘true, accurate and complete’’ to the ‘‘best of the Member’s 

knowledge.’’ Congresswoman Kilpatrick saw the value of her 

travel and retained copies of documents that showed its true 

value in her office files. Nonetheless, she certified inaccurate 

information on the post-travel disclosure form. 

d. As to topic 4, limitations on Carib News Foundation’s ability 

to pay for overseas travel of government officials, Congresswoman Kilpatrick told the OCE she was unaware of any such 

limitations. The Board finds this statement to be credible. 

Nonetheless, the law prohibits such payments. Therefore, the 

Board feels compelled to include a discussion of this issue in 

this referral. 

C. JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT

9. The allegations that are the subject of this review concern 

Representative Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick, a Member of the United 

States House of Representatives from the 13th District of Michigan. 

The Resolution the United States House of Representatives adopted creating the Office of Congressional Ethics directs that, ‘‘[n]o review shall be undertaken . . . by the board of any alleged violation 

that occurred before the date of adoption of this resolution.1 The 

House adopted this Resolution on March 11, 2008. Because the conduct under review occurred or relates to actions taken after March 

11, 2008, review by the Office of Congressional Ethics is in accordance with the Resolution. 

D. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

10. The OCE received a written request for a preliminary review 

in this matter signed by at least two members of the Board on 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS
8 

2 A preliminary review is ‘‘requested’’ in writing by members of the Board of the OCE. The 

request for a preliminary review is ‘‘received’’ by the OCE on a date certain. According to H. 

Res. 895 of the 110th Congress (hereafter ‘‘the Resolution’’), the timeframe for conducting a preliminary review is 30 days from the date of receipt of the Board’s request. 3 According to the Resolution, the Board must vote on whether to conduct a second-phase review in a matter before the expiration of the 30-day preliminary review. If the Board votes for 

a second-phase, the second-phase begins when the preliminary review ends. The second-phase 

review does not begin on the date of the Board vote. 4 House Rule 25(5)(h)(i)(1)(B) directs the Standards Committee to establish, ‘‘regulations describing the information it will require individuals subject to this clause to submit to the committee in order to obtain the prior approval of the committee for any travel covered by this 

clause . . .’’ On February 20, 2007, the Committee issued guidelines and regulations concerning 

the travel restrictions and requirements. 

March 6, 2009. The preliminary review commenced on this date.2

The preliminary review was scheduled to end on April 5, 2009. 

11. At least three members of the Board voted to initiate a second-phase review in this matter on March 27, 2009. The secondphase review commenced on April 6, 2009.3 The second-phase review was scheduled to end on May 21, 2009. 

12. The Board voted to extend the 45-day second-phase review by 

an additional 14 days, as provided for under the Resolution, on 

April 24, 2009. Following the extension, the second-phase review 

was scheduled to end on June 5, 2009. 

13. The second-phase review ended on May 26, 2009. 

14. The Board voted to refer the matter to the Standards Committee for further review on May 29, 2009. 

15. The OCE requested documents from and interviews with representatives of: 

(1) Representative Sheila Jackson-Lee’s Congressional office; 

(2) the Verizon Foundation; 

(3) Citibank; 

(4) American Airlines; 

(5) IBM; 

(6) Macy’s, Inc; 

(7) Pfizer; 

(8) AT&T; 

(9) Representative Kilpatrick’s Congressional office; 

(10) Representative Payne’s Congressional office; 

(11) Representative Rangel’s Congressional office; 

(12) Representative Thompson’s Congressional office; 

(13) Delegate Christensen’s Congressional office; 

(14) The Carib News; and 

(15) The Carib News Foundation 

II. MULTIPLE ENTITIES, INCLUDING CARIB NEWS (THE NEWSPAPER), THE GOVERNMENT OF ST. MAARTEN AND SEVERAL COR- PORATIONS, SPONSORED REPRESENTATIVE KILPATRICK’S TRIP

16. Under House Rule 25 clause 5(d), Members are required to obtain prior approval of the Standards Committee for trips where the 

Member’s travel expenses will be reimbursed by a private source. 

The Standards Committee has adopted regulations, pursuant to 

House Rule 25 clause 5(h)(i)(1)(B) 4 that requires Members to identify the ‘‘sponsor(s),’’ i.e. the party reimbursing travel expenses, for 

any trip where the payor is a private entity. 

17. There is substantial reason to believe that Congresswoman 

Kilpatrick violated the requirement that she identify the ‘‘true, corVerDate Aug 31 2005 14:33 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 054330 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 P:\54-330\REVIEW~1\54-330.TXT 54-330

steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS
9 

5 The ‘‘Member/Officer Post-Travel Disclosure Form’’ asks the filer at question 5, ‘‘Sponsor(s) 

(who paid for the trip).’’ This in turn raises the question, is a conference a ‘‘trip’’ or is a trip 

limited to the travel expenses associated with attending the trip, e.g., transportation, lodging 

and meal expenses’ The House Ethics manual and the relevant forms use the terms ‘‘travel’’ 

and ‘‘trip’’ interchangeably. For example, the relevant form is called a Member/Officer PostTravel Disclosure Form’’ (emphasis added). The introductory paragraph on the form provides, 

‘‘[t]his form is for disclosing the receipt of travel expenses from a private source for meetings, 

speaking engagements, fact-finding trips or similar events in connection with official duties’’ 

(emphasis added). However, question 9 on the form asks the filer to detail, ‘‘TRIP EXPENSES’’ 

and uses as an example, ‘‘registration fees.’’ Registration fees are not ‘‘travel’’ expenses unless 

one defines travel (or a trip) to include participating in a conference. The Board uses the term 

‘‘trip’’ to include the conference. The Board also notes that the Standards Committee treated 

the conference as the ‘‘trip’’ in its letter of October 21, 2008 pre-approving Congresswoman 

Kilpatrick’s trip. 6 Member/Officer Post-Travel Disclosure Form signed by Representative Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick (Nov. 20, 2008) (Exhibit 1 at 09–2567 0002). 

rect and accurate’’ sponsor of her travel ‘‘to the best of her knowledge’’ on her Member Post Travel Disclosure Form. While forms 

submitted to her and the Standards Committee before the conference identified one sponsor—the Carib News Foundation—once 

at the conference, Congresswoman Kilpatrick was presented with 

evidence that other corporations were sponsors. As will be discussed below, those indications proved to be true—the corporations 

were in fact sponsors of Congresswoman Kilpatrick’s travel according to House travel rules because the corporations had donated 

funds specifically for the conference (i.e. earmarked funds). 

A. REPRESENTATIVE KILPATRICK’S KNOWLEDGE OF THE INVOLVEMENT

OF THESE CORPORATIONS IN THE CONFERENCE

18. On her Member Post-Travel Disclosure Form, Congresswoman Kilpatrick listed Carib News Foundation as the only sponsor of her travel to and participation in the 13th Annual Caribbean 

Multi-National Business Conference in St. Maarten, N.A. (hereafter 

‘‘the trip’’ or ‘‘conference’’ 5) in November 2008.6


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS
10 

7 Id. at 09–2567 0003. 8Memorandum of Interview of Representative Carolyn Kilpatrick (May 14, 2009) (Exhibit 2 

at 09–2567 0034). 9Private Sponsor Travel Certification Form signed by Karl Rodney (Oct. 3, 2008) (Exhibit 1 

at 09–2567 0012). 

19. Congresswoman Kilpatrick certified that this information was 

‘‘true, correct and complete’’ to the ‘‘best of [her] knowledge.’’ 7

20. In an interview with the OCE, Representative Kilpatrick confirmed it was her signature on this document.8

21. Prior to the conference, Karl Rodney, the CEO of the Carib 

News Foundation, submitted a Private Sponsor Travel Certification 

Form to Congresswoman Kilpatrick, which she in turn submitted 

to the Standards Committee, which identified the Carib News 

Foundation as the sponsor of the trip.9


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.001 54330.002
11 

10 Id. 11 Id. at 09–2567 0014. 12Letter from the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct to Representative Carolyn C. 

Kilpatrick (Oct. 21, 2008) (Exhibit 1 at 09–2567 0007). 

22. Later, on that same form, Mr. Rodney represented that ‘‘the 

trip sponsor(s) [had] not accept from any other source funds earmarked directly or indirectly to finance any aspect of the trip.’’ 10

23. Rodney also certified that the information was ‘‘true, complete, and correct.’’11

24. Prior to the conference, the Standards Committee approved 

reimbursement of Congresswoman Kilpatrick’s expenses by the 

Carib News Foundation.12


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.003 54330.004 54330.005
12 

13Photographs taken at the 13th Annual Caribbean Multi-National Business Conference (Exhibit 5 at 09–2567 0068–0077) (The Board notes that the source of this information may have 

a bias, interest, or motive in this matter.). 14Transcript of Recording of November 7, 2008 AM Session of the 13th Annual Caribbean 

Multi-National Business Conference (Exhibit 3 at 09–2567 0036–37). (The Board notes that the 

source of this information may have a bias, interest, or motive in this matter.). 15 Id. at 09–2567 0036. 16 Id. at 09–2567 0038. 17 Id. at 09–2567 0053. 18Memorandum of Interview of Representative Carolyn Kilpatrick (May 14, 2009) (Exhibit 2 

at 09–2567 0032–0033). 

25. At the conference, several corporations, including Citibank, 

IBM, AT&T, and others, were identified as ‘‘sponsors.’’ 13

26. On November 7, 2008, the conference’s organizer, Karl Rodney, began the first morning program by thanking Citigroup, 

Pfizer, Macy’s, IBM, AT&T, the Verizon Foundation and American 

Airlines, as well as their executives in attendance at the conference 

by name.14 This morning session was recorded by an individual attending the conference and the recording was subsequently transcribed. The OCE obtained a copy of the transcript. Mr. Rodney described AT&T as ‘‘support[ing] the Conference all 13 years’’ (this 

was the thirteenth annual conference).15

27. Michael Flanigan, an executive from Citibank, spoke immediately after Mr. Rodney and described Citibank as the ‘‘lead sponsor of the premier event.’’16

28. Following Mr. Flanigan’s remarks, and the remarks of several other speakers, Representative Kilpatrick spoke. At the end of 

her remarks she stated, ‘‘[a]nd to the sponsors, by the way, all of 

you, we couldn’t do this, be with you, help Karl if you weren’t here 

with us so we say thank you very much, you are so important. To 

all of the sponsors, thank you very much.’’ 17

29. In an interview with the OCE, Representative Kilpatrick confirmed that she spoke at this session and thanked corporate entities identified at the conference as ‘‘sponsors.’’ 18


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.006
13 

19Photographs taken at the 13th Annual Caribbean Multi-National Business Conference (Exhibit 5 at 09–2567 0069). 20 Id. at 09–2567 0070. 

30. In addition to these comments, signs for the conference displayed these corporations’ logos, including signs hung behind the 

speaker’s podium where Representative Kilpatrick spoke.19

31. After she spoke but at the same morning session, Representative Kilpatrick participated in a ‘‘ribbon cutting’’ ceremony in which 

she and representatives from these corporations and the Leader of 

Government of St. Maarten, Commissioner Sarah Wescott-Williams, stood for photographs.20

32. In an interview with the OCE, Congresswoman Kilpatrick 

stated that she relied on the entity that invited her to the conVerDate Aug 31 2005 14:33 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 054330 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 P:\54-330\REVIEW~1\54-330.TXT 54-330

steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.007 54330.008
14 

21Memorandum of Interview of Representative Carolyn Kilpatrick (May 14, 2009) (Exhibit 2 

at 09–2567 0034). 22 Id. at 09–2567 0033. 23Private Sponsor Travel Certification Form signed by Karl Rodney (Oct. 3, 2008) (Exhibit 

1 at 09–2567 0012). 24Letter from Joel Cohen, Counsel for Karl Rodney (May 18, 2009) (Exhibit 6 at 09-2567 

0080). 

ference, the Carib News Foundation, to identify the sponsor of her 

trip and, further, that she relied on the Standards Committee, who 

pre-approved her trip, to determine if that information was accurate.21 As a result, Congresswoman Kilpatrick told the OCE that 

the involvement of these corporations in the conference did not 

raise questions in her mind about whether the Carib News Foundation was the sole sponsor of the conference.22

33. The Board notes that the practice of relying entirely on the 

Standards Committee to determine the sponsor of a Member’s travel carries with it a degree of risk. Further, while Members are required to receive pre-approval from the Standards Committee before they travel, it is the Member, and not the Standards Committee, that is ultimately accepting the travel from a private sponsor. The Board reads the pre-clearance process as a free-standing 

requirement the House adopted in 2007. There is no indication that 

the House intended it to supplant, or certainly completely supplant, 

Members’ responsibility to abide by the travel rules when they accept privately sponsored travel. As a result, it is the Board’s view 

that a reasonable reading of the travel rules places responsibility 

for identifying the sponsor with both the Member and the Standards Committee and not the Standards Committee alone. This 

shared responsibility also reflects the practical reality that, because 

the Member actually takes the trip, and the Standards Committee 

does not, the Member may, in certain circumstances, have access 

to information about the trip not available to the Standards Committee. In this instance, the Members had information about the 

sponsors of the conference not available to the Standards Committee, namely that numerous corporations were identified as sponsors of the conference at the conference. 

34. Further, as described below, these other entities were, in fact, 

sponsors of the conference. 

B. CARIB NEWS ALSO SPONSORED CONGRESSWOMAN KILPATRICK’S

TRAVEL

35. Karl Rodney is the publisher of the CARIB NEWS, a weekly 

newspaper published in New York. He also identified himself as 

the CEO of the Carib News Foundation on the Private Sponsor 

Travel Certification described above.23

36. According to Mr. Rodney, ‘‘general funds’’ of CARIB NEWS 

were ‘‘pooled’’ with payments from corporate sponsors, made both 

to CARIB NEWS and the Carib News Foundation and fees from 

attendees at the conference to pay conference expenses including 

‘‘travel’’ and ‘‘hotel payments.’’ 24

37. Therefore, CARIB NEWS was also effectively a sponsor of 

Congresswoman Kilpatrick’s trip. 

C. CORPORATE DONATIONS WERE EARMARKED FOR THE CONFERENCE

38. According to the House Ethics Manual: 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS
15 

25Letter from Carib News Foundation to Mr. Eric Eve, Citigroup, Inc. (Apr. 4, 2008) (Exhibit 

7 at 09–2567 0084–0085) (a nearly identical letter was sent to IBM, AT&T, Pfizer, Verizon 

Foundation and others). 

The rule and implementing regulations are concerned with the 

organization(s) or individual(s) that actually pay for travel. 

Thus, for example, when a nonprofit organization pays for travel with donations that were earmarked, either formally or informally, for the trip, each such donor is deemed a—private source 

for the trip and (1) must be publicly disclosed as a trip sponsor 

on the applicable travel forms and (2) must itself be required 

to satisfy the above standards on proper sources of travel expenses. 

39. In the course of conducting its review, the OCE has learned 

that the Carib News Foundation solicited earmarked funds for the 

conference. For example, Carib News Foundation sent a solicitation 

letter to Citigroup, Inc.25


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS
16 

26 Id. at 09–2567 0086–0101. 27 Id. at 09–2567 0094–0097. 

40. Attached to this solicitation letter was a PowerPoint presentation.26 The presentation solicits money only for the conference 

and not for any other purpose, outlining the benefits of each level 

of sponsorship—Platinum, Gold, and Silver, along with lesser levels 

of sponsorship—in terms of the conference.27 In each instance, the 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.009
17 

sponsorship covers travel related expenses such as gala events and 

meals. 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.010
18 

28 Letter from IRS to OCE (April 17, 2009) (Exhibit 8 at 09–2567 0106–0118). 29 Id. at 09–2567 0106–0108. 30 Memorandum of Interview of Representative of IBM (May 8, 2009) (Exhibit 9 at 09–2567 

0122). 31Documents submitted to the OCE by Citigroup (Exhibit 7 at 09–2567 0083). 

The OCE also learned that at least four of the corporations identified at the conference did in fact make payments to the Carib News 

Foundation and CARIB NEWS (the newspaper) earmarked for the 

conference. The Carib News Foundation itself appears to be nothing more than a conduit in this case, and a partial one at that, for 

payments from corporations to support the conference. There is no 

evidence that the organization has filed a tax return with the IRS, 

under either Carib News Foundation or Carib News Charities, 

since 2005.28 On that form, the Carib News Foundation is shown 

as having no assets, no income and no expenses.29 Not a single witness from a sponsor interviewed by the OCE knew of any other 

work of the Foundation. Indeed one witness, from IBM, was not 

aware that the Foundation played a role in the conference.30

41. Citigroup. Citigroup made a $75,000 payment to the CARIB 

NEWS for the conference.31


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.011
19 

32 Mr. Rodney accepted corporate payments under the names of three entities: The Carib 

News, the Carib News Foundation, and the Carib News Charities. According to the Secretary 

of State for the State of New York, the organization that currently operates as the Carib News 

Foundation originally operated under the name the CaribNews Charities. 33 Documents Submitted to the OCE by the Verizon Foundation (Exhibit 10 at 09–2567 0127). 34Memorandum of Interview of Representative 1 of Verizon Foundation (Mar. 23, 2009) (Exhibit 11 at 09–2567 0133). 35Documents submitted by IBM to the OCE (Exhibit 13 at 09–2567 0150). 

42. Verizon Foundation. Verizon Foundation made a $35,000 

payment to the Carib News Charities 32 or the conference.33

43. Representative 1 of the Verizon Foundation said the Verizon 

Foundation funded the Carib News Foundation for the first time in 

2008 and that the grant was issued to provide funding for the 13th

Annual Caribbean Multi-National Business Conference.34

44. IBM. IBM made a $20,000 payment to Carib News Foundation for the conference as indicated on the invoice that CARIB 

NEWS, INC. (not Carib News Foundation) sent IBM.35


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.012
20 

36Memorandum of Interview of Representative 1 from Macy’s (Exhibit 20 at 09–2567 0217). 37 Interview with Investigative Counsel on May 22, 2009.μ 38Documents submitted by American Airlines to the OCE (Exhibit 14 at 09–2567 0151.2) and 

OCE Investigative Counsel interview with American Airlines Representative (Mar. 5, 2009) 

(American Airlines provided an in-kind contribution in the form of ten roundtrip tickets to be 

used by Carib News in any manner they chose with the exception that no ticket could be used 

for an elected official or the official’s staff or family. The estimated value of their contribution 

was between $6,200 and $7,500). 

45. Macy’s. Macy’s made a $35,000 payment to CARIB NEWS 

for the conference.36

46. Pfizer. Pfizer made a $25,000 payment to CARIB NEWS for 

the conference37

47. Only American Airlines explicitly limited their sponsorship of 

the conference to individuals who were not elected officials, prohibiting CARIB NEWS from using any part of their sponsorship on 

Members of Congress and other government officials and their 

staff.38 No other sponsor with whom we spoke placed restrictions 

on how or on whom their contribution could be spent. The only expectation was that the contribution would be used for expenses associated with the conference. 

D. BECAUSE ENTITIES THAT EMPLOY OR RETAIN LOBBYISTS SPONSORED THE EVENT, CONGRESSWOMAN KILPATRICK’S INVOLVEMENT

SHOULD HAVE BEEN LIMITED TO ONE DAY

48. According to the House Ethics Manual: One-Day Event Trip. 

The sole exception to the general prohibition on accepting officiallyconnected travel from a private source that retains or employs lobbyists or agents of a foreign principal is for trips involving attendance 

at or participation in one-day event (exclusive of travel time and an 

overnight stay). 

Under the rule, it is permissible for a Member or staff person 

to accept and meals related to a single night’s lodging and 

meals related to the trip, if offered by the trip sponsor. Members 

and staff must limit their involvement in connection with the 

event to a single calendar day, exclusive of travel time and an 

overnight stay. A Member or staff person may therefore attend 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.013
21 

39 House Ethics Manual (2008) at 92–93 (citing House Rule 25, clause 5(b)(1)(C) (emphasis in 

original)). 40 Clerk of the House of Representatives Lobbying Disclosure Report 2008 (Exhibit 15 at 09– 

2567 0151.8). 41Member/Officer Post-Travel Disclosure Form signed by Representative Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick (Nov. 20, 2008) (Exhibit 1 at 09–2567 0002). 42Letter from Leader of Government of St. Maarten, Commissioner Sarah Wescot-Williams, 

to Representative Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick (Aug. 28, 2008) (Exhibit 1 at 09–2567 0009). 

only a single day of a multiple-day conference, forum, or other 

event that is being hosted primarily for individuals other than 

congressional invitees. 

Under the Committee’s travel regulations and guidelines implementing the travel provisions of the gift rule, the Committee 

may permit a second night’s stay when determined—on a 

case-by-case basis to be practically required to participate in the 

one-day event (House Rule 25, clause 5(b)(1)(C)). Some circumstances in which the Committee may permit a second 

night’s stay are for certain long-distance trips, when a Member 

or staff person is participating in a full day’s worth of officiallyconnected activities such that a second night’s stay is necessary 

to accomplish the purpose of the trip, or other exceptional circumstances that are described in detail by the traveler. The 

traveler will be personally responsible for any expenses incurred 

beyond those allowed by the Committee in connection with the 

second night’s stay.39

49. Citigroup, IBM and Verizon employ or retain lobbyists.40

50. Congresswoman Kilpatrick spent four days at the conference.41

51. There is substantial reason to believe that Congresswoman 

Kilpatrick violated House Rule 25, clause 5(b)(1)(C) by accepting 

trip-related reimbursements from entities that employ or retain 

lobbyists for participating in an event for more than one day. 

E. THE GOVERNMENT OF ST. MAARTEN MADE IN-KIND DONATIONS TO

THE 2008 CONFERENCE AND PLAYED A SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN PLANNING, ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING THE 2008 CONFERENCE

52. The Government of St. Maarten was the host of the 2008 conference and the Leader of Government of St. Maarten personally 

invited Representative Kilpatrick to attend.42


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS
22 

43 In 2007, the ’host’ of the conference was the Government of Antigua and Barbuda. In the 

event that the Government of Antigua and Barbuda provided the same support as St. Maarten 

did in 2008, then the members may have accepted gifts from a foreign government which would 

have been reportable under the Foreign Gift and Decorations Act. In addition, if the Government of Antigua provided these gifts to the Members, and if they were more than $335 in value, 

then the Members should have disclosed them on their financial disclosure form for 2007, which 

was filed in May 2008. 44Letter from Karl Rodney to Commissioner Sarah Wescott-Williams (Aug. 13, 2008) (Exhibit 

16 at 09–2567 0151.15). 

53. In that capacity, the Government of St. Maarten provided inkind donations to support the conference and also had a substantial role in planning the conference. As a result, it was effectively 

a sponsor of the 2008 conference.43

54. Rodney provided the Leader of Government of St. Maarten, 

Commissioner Sarah Wescott-Williams, with a list of ‘‘Basic Requirements to Host Caribbean Multi-National Business Conference.’’ 44 These included: 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.014
23 

45Letter from Joel Cohen, Counsel for Karl Rodney (May 18, 2009) (Exhibit 6 at 09–2567 

0079–0080). 46 Id. 

55. According to a statement from Mr. Rodney submitted to the 

OCE, the Government of St. Maarten, (1) developed local Host 

Committees to facilitate local planning; (2) helped negotiate the 

rate with the hotel, (3) assisted in developing the theme of the Conference, (4) assisted in identifying local speakers, including the 

Leader of Government, (5) assisted in local publicity, (6) provided 

local entertainment, including a school choir and cultural items, (7) 

arranged Host Country Evening on Friday, November 8 (the whole 

group was transported to another property for refreshments and 

entertainment), (8) helped with local transportation for some 

CARIB NEWS employees and helped arrange accommodations for 

some guests (not paying for such accommodations), (9) participated 

as event speakers, and (10) issued invitations to attend to specially 

invited guests.45 These contributions to the conference were all inkind, according to Mr. Rodney, and he did not provide an estimated 

value for them.46


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.015
24 

47 5 U.S.C. δ 7342. 48Memorandum of Interview of Representative Carolyn Kilpatrick (May 14, 2009) (Exhibit 2 

at 09–2567 0033). 49 Id. at 09–2567 0034. 50 House Ethics Manual (2008) at 92–93 (citing House Rule 25, clause 5(b)(1)(C)). 

56. In addition, because these donations to the conference are 

from a foreign government, Members are required to take certain 

actions under the Foreign Gifts and Decorations Act.47

57. Representative Kilpatrick told the OCE that she was unaware of what role the Government of St. Maarten played in the 

conference.48

III. ROLE OF THE CHAIR’S COUNSEL IN THE APPROVAL OF THE 12th

ANNUAL CARIBBEAN MULTI-NATIONAL BUSINESS CONFERENCE IN

2007 

58. As previously stated, Congresswoman Kilpatrick told the 

OCE that she relied on the Standards Committee to determine who 

the true sponsor of the conference was based on information the 

Standards Committee received from the organization that invited 

her to the conference—the Carib News Foundation.49 In the course 

of the Board’s review, the OCE requested documents from Mr. Karl 

Rodney, the CEO of the Carib News Foundation. Mr Rodney voluntarily submitted documents to the OCE that included, among other 

things, communication with certain members of the staff of the 

Committee on Standards of Official Conduct in 2007. The contents 

of these documents from 2007 are relevant because they indicate 

the role of the corporations was concealed from the Committee in 

2008. 

59. The Board requested that the Committee provide the information submitted to it for 2008 and the Committee declined to do 

so. 

60. The documents submitted by Mr. Rodney show that in 2007 

the CARIB NEWS initially identified, on several occasions, other 

corporations as sponsors of the Conference. The designation of 

these corporate entities as sponsors presented a problem for CARIB 

NEWS and the Members who wished to attend the conference insofar as their attendance would be limited to one day. In 2007, as a 

result of changes in the travel rules, a Member could not, in most 

instances, participate in an event (such as a conference) for more 

than one day if their travel to and participation in the event was 

paid for by an entity that employed or retained a lobbyist.50 Many 

of the corporate entities who sponsored the 2007, as well as the 

2008 conference, employed or retained lobbyists. Although CARIB 

NEWS initially identified these entities as sponsors, following 

interactions with the counsel to the then-chair of the Committee, 

apparently without the knowledge of the Standards Committee 

staff attorney assigned to review the trip, the documents identifying these organizations as sponsors were changed. 

61. Subsequently, in 2008, the Carib News Foundation submitted 

documents that omitted the role of these other corporations as 

sponsors of the conference. Further, the staff attorney assigned to 

review the trip in 2008 was not the same staff attorney that reviewed the trip in 2007. 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS
25 

51 E-mail from Patricia Louis to Dawn Kelly Mobley (Sept. 17, 2007, 3:47 PM EST) (Exhibit 

17 at 09–2567 0174) (The Board elected not the interview Ms. Mobley and Ms. Olson because 

the Standards Committee voted against disclosing information to the OCE. The Board determined that it would have been an act of bad faith on the part of the OCE to attempt to interview staff and former staff of the Standards Committee in light of the Committee’s refusal to 

grant OCE access to their records.). 52 E-mail from Dawn Kelly Mobley to Patricia Louis (Sept. 18, 2007, 12:57 PM EST) (Exhibit 

17 at 09–2567 0174). 53 E-mail from Patricia Louis to Dawn Kelly Mobley (Sept. 18, 2007) (Exhibit 17 at 09–2567 

0190) (The Board notes that while the document that contains the e–mail does not have a header which indicates a date and time, both the e-mail before it and responding to it are dated 

September 18, 2007). 54 E-mail from Dawn Kelly Mobley to Patricia Louis (Sept. 18, 2007, 7:03 PM EST) (Exhibit 

17 at 09–2567 0189). 55 E-mail from Dawn Kelly Mobley to Patricia Louis (Sept. 19, 2007, 2:16 PM EST) (Exhibit 

17 at 09–2567 0189). 56 House Ethics Manual (2008) at 97–98. 

62. The earliest communication between CARIB NEWS or the 

Carib News Foundation and anyone associated with the Ethics 

Committee in the documents submitted to the OCE from Mr. Rodney is an e-mail dated September 17, 2007 from Patricia Louis, an 

Executive Assistant at CARIB NEWS, to Dawn Kelly Mobley, 

Counsel to the then-Chair of the Ethics Committee.51

63. The next day, on September 18, 2007, Ms. Mobley responded 

and asked for ‘‘any information on your sponsor’s status.’’ 52

64. That same day Ms. Louis responded, indentifying multiple 

corporations as ’sponsors’ of the trip.53

65. In response that same day, Ms. Mobley asked, ‘‘[d]o any of 

these organizations have or retain a lobbyist’ ’’ 54

66. The next day, Ms. Mobley further responded asking Ms. 

Louis whether she, Ms. Mobley, should ‘‘assume’’ the sponsor was 

CARIB NEWS, despite the fact that Ms. Louis had not identified 

CARIB NEWS as a sponsor.55 The Board notes that in her e-mail, 

Ms. Louis did not identify CARIB NEWS as a sponsor. Further, 

Ms. Mobley acknowledged that she had been told corporations identified by Ms. Louis were ‘‘sponsoring food and other parts of the 

Antigua travel.’’ Under House rules in place at the time, and under 

current rules, sponsoring a meal makes these corporations sponsors 

of a Member’s travel.56 The Board also notes Ms. Mobley’s use of 

the phrase ‘‘safe review,’’ which the Board takes to mean a review 

which results in approval of the trip. 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.016
26 

57 E-mail from Dawn Kelly Mobley to Patricia Louis (Sept. 19, 2007, 3:23 PM EST) (Exhibit 

17 at 09–2567 0189). 58 E-mail from Patricia Louis to Dawn Kelly Mobley (Sept. 21, 2007, 1:56 PM EST) (Exhibit 

17 at 09–2567 0187). 

67. Later in the afternoon on September 19, 2007, Ms. Mobley 

sent Ms. Louis another e-mail where she discussed the limitations 

posed by the new travel rules the House had adopted in 2007. Ms. 

Mobley told Ms. Louis, ‘‘the new rules might prohibit some things 

you were able to do with so many different sponsors in the past.’’ 

Thus, Ms. Mobley again acknowledged that these corporations were 

sponsors and that the new travel rules affected the nature of their 

participation in the trip.57

68. On September 21, 2007, Ms. Louis responded.58


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.017 54330.018
27 

59Private Sponsor Travel Certification Form (Sept. 21, 2007) (Exhibit 17 at 09–2567 0177). 60 Id. at 09–2567 0178. 

69. That same day, on September 21, 2007, Ms. Louis faxed Ms. 

Mobley a Private Sponsor Travel Certification Form. On the form 

Carib News Foundation is listed as the sponsor of the trip in question 1.59

70. However, the Carib News Foundation listed a number of corporations as private sponsors, each with responsibility for planning 

and conducting the trip, in question 12.60 This is at least the second instance where the Carib News Foundation identified these 

corporations as the trip’s sponsors. 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.019 54330.020
28 

61 E-mail from Dawn Kelly Mobley to Patricia Louis (Sept. 25, 2007, 12:42 PM EST) (Exhibit 

17 at 09–2567 0174). 62 E-mail from Dawn Kelly Mobley to Patricia Louis (Sept. 25, 2007, 5:08 PM EST) (Exhibit 

17 at 09–2567 0174). 63 E-mail from Dawn Kelly Mobley to Patricia Louis (Oct. 3, 2007, 12:39 PM EST) (Exhibit 

17 at 09–2567 0171). 64Private Sponsor Travel Certification Form (Sept. 21, 2007) (Exhibit 17 at 09–2567 0177). 65Private Sponsor Travel Certification Form (Oct. 5, 2007) (Exhibit 18 at 09–2567 0192). 

71. This prompted the following e-mail from Ms. Mobley to Ms. 

Louis.61 The Board notes that Ms. Mobley stated she was ‘‘working 

through’’ the Carib News Foundation’s forms ‘‘before leaving them 

with our staff attorney.’’ 

72. Later that same day, Ms. Mobley queried further.62 At least 

as of this date, following at least two instances where Ms. Louis 

identified these corporations as sponsors, Ms. Mobley appeared to 

treat these entities as ‘‘co-sponsors.’’ 

73. On October 3, 2007, Ms. Mobley informed Ms. Louis that 

Susan Olson was the staff attorney assigned to review the trip.63

74. A copy of the Private Sponsor Travel Certification Form provided to a Member’s office on October 5, 2007, shows that by October 5, 2007, following its interaction with Ms. Mobley, Carib News 

Foundation changed its answer to question 12 regarding other private sponsors. As previously highlighted, as of September 21, 2007, 

Carib News Foundation provided the following answer to question 

12.64

75. However, as of October 5, 2007, it provided a different answer to question 12.65


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.021 54330.022 54330.023 54330.024 54330.025
29 

66 Id. at 09–2567 0197. 67 E-mail from Susan Olson to Patricia Louis (Oct. 10, 2007, 4:01 PM EST) (Exhibit 17 at 09– 

2567 0159–0160). 

And the attached sheet provided the following information.66

On October 10, 2007, Susan Olson, the staff attorney on the Standards Committee assigned to review the trip e-mailed Ms. Louis the 

following questions 67 (and copied Ms. Mobley and the Chief Counsel of the Standards Committee at that time, Bill O’Reilly). While 

the Private Sponsor Travel Certification Form for the trip had been 

changed by this date, the draft agenda for the conference apparently had not and still showed corporate sponsors for various 

events. What Ms. Olson does not appear to be aware of is the fact 

that Carib News Foundation had previously identified the same 

corporations she is raising questions about as private sponsors on 

its original Private Sponsor Travel Certification form. 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.026 54330.027
30 

68 Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, Advisory Opinion (Oct. 27, 2006) (Exhibit 17 

at 09–2567 0183–0185). 

76. The Committee’s Advisory Opinion dated October 27, 2006 indicates, as Ms. Olson wrote, that Carib News Foundation told the 

Standards Committee in 2006 that there were several corporate entities that sponsored the conference.68 The ‘‘Advisory Opinion’’ did 

not conclude that these entities were, in fact, the trip’s sponsors, 

as the e-mail seems to indicate. 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.028
31 

69 Working Draft of the 13th Annual Caribbean Multi-National Business Conference Program 

(Oct. 3, 2007) (Exhibit 19 at 09–2567 0198–0215). 70 Id. at 09–2567 0204–0205. 71 Id. at 09–2567 0211. 

77. A draft agenda for the conference dated October 3, 2007, 

identified a ‘‘sponsor’’ for each event listed.69 This appears to be the 

version of the agenda that Olson is referring to in her e-mail. For 

example, ‘‘Preferred Health Partners’’ is identified as the sponsor 

of this event on ‘‘Port & Airport Security—The Mandates.’’ 70

And Citi is identified as the sponsor of this event on ‘‘Community 

Outreach—Education—Access and Collaboration.71

78. Ms. Louis forwarded Ms. Olson’s e-mail to Ms. Mobley, Congressman Charles Rangel’s Chief of Staff George Dalley and DeleVerDate Aug 31 2005 14:33 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 054330 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 P:\54-330\REVIEW~1\54-330.TXT 54-330

steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.029 54330.030
32 

72 E-mail from Patricia Louis to Dawn Kelly Mobley, George Dalley, and Shelley Thomas (Oct. 

10, 2007, 5:56 PM EST) (Exhibit 17 at 09–2567 0163). 73Memorandum of Interview of Representative of IBM (May 8, 2009) (Exhibit 9); Memorandum of Interview of Representative 1 of the Verizon Foundation (Mar. 23, 2009) (Exhibit 11); 

Memorandum of Interview of Representative of Citi (Mar. 17, 2009) (Exhibit 4); Memorandum 

of Interview of Representative 1 from Macy’s (Exhibit 20). 74 E-mail from Dawn Kelly Mobley to Patricia Louis (Oct. 10, 2007, 6:49 PM EST) (Exhibit 

17 at 09–2567 0165). 

gate Donna Christensen’s scheduler Shelley Thomas, and asked 

them to advise her on a response.72

Ms. Louis appears to be pre-clearing her response to questions 

posed by the Standards Committee staff attorney. There is no indication that the staff attorney knew that the answer to her question 

had already been discussed with the counsel to the then-chair of 

the Standards Committee. Substantively, based on documents obtained by the OCE and interviews with sponsors, the statement 

‘‘the sponsors contribute to the overall expense of the trip’’ appears 

to be true. However, the statement ‘‘and the general work of the 

Foundation,’’ does not appear to be true. All of the sponsors OCE 

interviewed stated unequivocally that the contribution was intended for the conference.73

79. Less than an hour later Ms. Mobley responded.74 The Board 

notes Ms. Mobley’s concern with whether any of the corporate 

sponsors paid for an event and also retained a lobbyist’’ and her 

conclusion that if they did, Members of Congress could only attend 

for one day. 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.031
33 

75Fax from Patricia Louis to Dawn Kelly Mobley (Oct. 11, 2007) (Exhibit 17 at 09–2567 0162). 

80. Ms. Louis then faxed Ms. Mobley.75 The Board notes that Ms. 

Louis again appears to be pre-clearing her responses to the staff attorney, Ms. Olson, with Ms. Mobley (‘‘Kindly review and advise before I send to Ms. Olson.’’ ). 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.032
34 

76Working Draft of the 13th Annual Caribbean Multi-National Business Conference Program 

(Oct. 22, 2007) (Exhibit 21 at 09–2567 0221–0232). 

81. The Board further notes that Ms. Louis represented that, 

‘‘the program has been amended to reflect the companies as Participants,’’ an action taken following Ms. Louis’ interactions with Ms. 

Mobley. A copy of the revised agenda was submitted by another 

Member of Congress who attended the conference.76 The Board 

notes that this ‘‘updated’’ schedule changed the label applied to 

‘‘sponsors’’ to ‘‘participants’’ and in some cases deleted any mention 

of the corporate entity that had previously been identified as a 

‘‘sponsor.’’ 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.033
35 

77 Working Draft of the 13th Annual Caribbean Multi-National Business Conference Program 

(Oct. 3, 2007) (Exhibit 19 at 09–2567 0204-0205). 78 Working Draft of the 13th Annual Caribbean Multi-National Business Conference Program 

(Oct. 22, 2007) (Exhibit 20 at 09–2567 0225). 79 Working Draft of the 13th Annual Caribbean Multi-National Business Conference Program 

(Oct. 3, 2007) (Exhibit 19 at 09–2567 0211). 80 Working Draft of the 13th Annual Caribbean Multi-National Business Conference Program 

(Oct. 22, 2007) (Exhibit 21 at 09–2567 0231). 81 Memorandum of Interview of Representative of Citi (Mar. 17, 2009) (Exhibit 4). 

82. This event was previously identified in the earlier draft as 

being ‘‘sponsored’’ by Preferred Health Partners.77 Now it identifies 

them as merely a ‘‘participant.’’ 78

83. In another example, the Board notes that the following event 

was previously identified as being sponsored by CITI.79 Now CITI 

is not even mentioned.80 Michael Flanigan, the moderator, was an 

executive at CITI at the time and represented the company at the 

conference.81


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.034 54330.035
36 

82 E-mail from Patricia Louis to Susan Olson (Oct. 10, 2007, 10:33 AM EST) (Exhibit 17 at 

09–2567 0159). 83 E-mail from Susan Olson to Bill O’Reilly and Dawn Kelly Mobley (Oct. 12, 2007 9:29 AM) 

(Exhibit 17 at 09–2567 0158–0159). 

84. These changes were entirely cosmetic. There is no indication 

that the corporations’ substantive role in the conference changed in 

any way. 

85. That same day, October 11, 2007, Ms. Louis responded to Ms. 

Olson, stating that ‘‘[t]he sponsors contribute to the overall expense 

of the trip.’’ 82 The Board notes that this is precisely the answer she 

had pre-cleared with Mobley. 

86. Ms. Olson then forwarded her exchange with Ms. Louis to 

Bill O’Reilly, the Staff Director and Chief Counsel of the Ethics 

Committee at that time, and to Dawn Mobley.83 Based on this email, it appears that Ms. Olson was unaware that Mobley had been 

communicating directly with the Carib News Foundation. There is 

also no evidence that Ms. Mobley told her she had been involved 

in this manner. Witnesses for the various sponsors told the OCE 

that they did contribute funding directly to the trip (the conference) 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.036 54330.037
37 

84 Memorandum of Interview of Representative of IBM (May 8, 2009) (Exhibit 9); Memorandum of Interview of Representative 1 of the Verizon Foundation (Mar. 23, 2009) (Exhibit 11); 

Memorandum of Interview of Representative of Citi (Mar. 17, 2009) (Exhibit 4); Memorandum 

of Interview of Representative 1 from Macy’s (Exhibit 20). 85 E-mail from Dawn Kelly Mobley to Patricia Louis (Oct. 12, 2007 9:59 AM EST) (Exhibit 

17 at 09–2567 0158). 86 E-mail from Dawn Kelly Mobley to Patricia Louis (Oct. 12, 2007 1:55 PM EST) (Exhibit 17 

at 09–2567 0158). 

and in no case did they simply make donations to the ‘‘general 

funds’’ of the CARIB NEWS or the Carib News Foundation.84

87. Ms. Mobley then forwarded Ms. Olson’s internal e-mail to Ms. 

Louis.85 The Board notes that Ms. Mobley counseled that these 

‘‘other organizations’’ can ‘‘participate’’ in the program but ‘‘should 

not help pay for the trip.’’ 

88. Later that day, Ms. Mobley sent Ms. Louis an additional email.86 As previously stated, the sponsors whom the OCE interviewed all stated that they did not ‘‘support [the] foundation annually’’ and did specifically designate their donations for the 2007 

conference. Either Ms. Mobley was repeating inaccurate information Ms. Louis had given her, or she was giving inaccurate information to Ms. Olson without prompting. 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.038 54330.039
38 

87 E-mail from Susan Olson to Patricia Louis (Oct. 12, 2007 2:41 PM EST) (Exhibit 17 at 09– 

2567 0155). 

89. Ms. Olson then sent Ms. Louis additional questions about the 

corporate entities previously identified as ‘‘sponsors.87


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.040
39 

88 E-mail from Patricia Louis to Dawn Kelly Mobley (Oct. 18, 2007 11:00 AM EST) (Exhibit 

17 at 09–2567 0153). 

90. Three days later, Ms. Louis sent an e-mail to Ms. Mobley, but 

addressed to Ms. Olson.88 This may have been inadvertent or, 

based on their previous practice, Ms. Louis may have done this before she then sent it to Ms. Olson. This is the final communication 

regarding the 2007 conference provided to the OCE. 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.041
40 

89 Memorandum of Interview of Staff Member 1 of Congressman Rangel’s Office (May 27– 

28, 2009) (Exhibit 22). 90 Id. at 09–2657 0235. 

91. In an interview with the OCE, a staff member of Representative Rangel’s office, Staff Member 1 of Congressman Rangel’s Office, described discussions with Ms. Louis and Ms. Mobley in 2007 

on the topic of how the new travel rules would affect the Members’ 

participation in the 2007 conference.89 The staff member said that 

Ms. Louis, and Mr. and Mrs. Rodney told him that the then Chair 

of the Standards Committee had assigned her counsel on the Committee, Ms. Mobley, to ‘‘find a way’’ to allow Members of Congress 

to participate in the conference under the new travel rules passed 

by the House in 2007.90 The staff member told the OCE that Congressman Rangel told him that the then-Chair had made similar 

statements to him. 

92. Staff Member 1 of Congressman Rangel’s Office said the 

‘‘framework’’ that was decided upon was that the Carib News Foundation would raise money from corporate donors who had previously sponsored the conference and that this money in turn 

would be deposited in a ‘‘common fund’’ that would then be used 

to pay for the conference. It was Staff Member 1 of Congressman 

Rangel’s Office’s understanding that if this was done, then Members of Congress could participate in the conference without any restrictions imposed by the new rules. Staff Member 1 of Congressman Rangel’s Office said that it was important to break the link 

between the corporations and the conference under the new rules 

and that using the Foundation in this way would enable that to 

happen. Staff Member 1 of Congressman Rangel’s Office said he 

learned of this new framework for the conference from Mr. and 

Mrs. Rodney and that they represented this approach had come 

from Ms. Mobley on the Standards Committee. 

93. This conduct in 2007 is relevant to the present review for a 

number of reasons. First, in and of itself, the intervention of the 

Chair’s counsel in this matter is troubling and more likely constituted an improper manipulation of the clearance process. Following Ms. Mobley’s intervention, Carib News Foundation changed 

the Private Sponsor Travel Certification Form to delete any mention of private sponsors before it was sent to the Standards Committee’s staff attorney assigned to review the matter. This occurred 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.042
41 

91Fax from Patricia Louis to Dawn Kelly Mobley (Aug. 20, 2008) (Exhibit 23 at 09–2567 

0247–0269). 

after Carib News Foundation had told Ms. Mobley that these corporations were sponsors of the conference on several occasions. Ms. 

Louis’s initial, and presumably truthful, submissions regarding the 

conference described the corporate entities as sponsors. However, if 

the corporations were sponsors of the conference, as opposed to 

Carib News Foundation, then the Members of Congress ability to 

attend would have been limited because, the corporations, unlike 

the Carib News Foundation, employed or retained lobbyists. It appears from the correspondence between Ms. Mobley and Ms. Louis, 

and Ms. Olson’s apparent ignorance of the correspondence, that Ms. 

Mobley assisted Ms. Louis in preparing inaccurate answers for Ms. 

Olson in order to ensure that Ms. Olson would approve the trip in 

a manner that would not limit the attendance of the Members of 

Congress. Ms. Mobley’s involvement in the process seems to have 

prevented the Standards Committee and its staff from correctly 

performing its responsibilities. Ms. Olson’s approval of the trip was 

predicated on an incomplete or inaccurate factual record, in which 

Ms. Mobley apparently was complicit, putting at risk those Members of Congress who relied on that approval. 

94. The 2007 conduct and attendant misrepresentations appear 

to have directly influenced what occurred in 2008. When the Carib 

News Foundation submitted materials to the Standards Committee 

for their approval of the 2008 conference, the Carib News Foundation took the same approach that they had been counseled to take 

in 2007 and did not disclose the role of the corporate sponsors on 

the Private Sponsor Travel Certification Form or the conference 

agenda. 

95. In fact, in 2008, Carib News Foundation again first submitted its document to Ms. Mobley.91 The Board notes that while 

Ms. Mobley remains an employee of the U.S. House of Representatives as of the date of this report, the above described conduct did 

not occur after the day the House passed the resolution creating 

the OCE, and therefore, under the terms of the that resolution, the 

OCE does not have jurisdiction to open a preliminary review into 

Ms. Mobley’s conduct. 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS
42 

92 House Rule 25(5)(h)(i)(1)(B) directs the Standards Committee to establish, ‘‘regulations describing the information it will require individuals subject to this clause to submit to the committee in order to obtain the prior approval of the committee for any travel covered by this 

clause . . .’’ On February 20, 2007, the Committee issued guidelines and regulations concerning 

the travel restrictions and requirements. 

IV. THE VALUE OF THE TRIP REPORTED ON THE MEMBER’S POSTTRAVEL DISCLOSURE FORM

96. Under House Rule 25 clause 5(d), Members are required to obtain prior approval of the Standards Committee for trips where the 

Member’s travel expenses will be reimbursed by a private source. 

The Standards Committee has adopted regulations, including a preand post-travel form Members must complete, pursuant to House 

Rule 25 clause 5(h)(i)(1)(B) 92 that requires Members to publicly disclose ‘‘trip expenses.’’ 

97. According to the House Ethics Manual, ‘‘[t]he rule and implementing regulations are concerned with the organization(s) or individual(s) that actually pay for travel.’’ House Ethics Manual (2008) 

at 97. 

98. There is substantial reason to believe that Congresswoman 

Kilpatrick violated House Rule 25 clause 5(h)(i)(1)(B) by underreporting the value of the travel reimbursements she received to 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.043
43 

93Private Sponsor Travel Certification Form signed by Karl Rodney (Oct. 3, 2008) (Exhibit 

1 at 09–2567 0012). 94Memorandum from Carib News Foundation to Representatives Rangel, Thompson, Payne 

and Kilpatrick and Delegate Christensen (Nov. 18, 2008) (Exhibit 1 at 09–2567 0004–0005). 

attend the 13th Annual Caribbean Multi-National Business Conference. 

A. REPRESENTATIONS FROM CARIB NEWS FOUNDATION

99. Carib News Foundation submitted a Private Sponsor Travel 

Certification Form to each Member it sponsored for the 2008 trip— 

Representatives Christensen, Kilpatrick, Payne, Rangel and 

Thompson.93 This form was provided to each Member Office and 

then submitted by the Member Office to the Standards Committee 

as part of the pre-travel approval process. 

100. The Board notes that the Carib News Foundation provided 

the same exact dollar figure for each Member of Congress that attended the conference despite the fact that Carib News Foundation 

recognized on the same form that the Congressional travelers were 

travelling to and from different cities. In fact, the Congressional 

travelers came from St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands; Detroit, Michigan; Newark, New Jersey; New York, New York; and Jackson, Mississippi. 

101. After the conference, the Carib News Foundation provided 

a memorandum to Representatives Rangel, Thompson, Payne and 

Kilpatrick and Delegate Christensen that represented to contain 

the value of the trip-related reimbursements.94


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.044
44 

102. The Board notes that the Carib News Foundation provided 

the same ‘‘total transportation’’ figure to the Congressional travelers despite the fact that Carib News Foundation had, in its own 

files, airline tickets and receipts for each Congressional traveler 

that showed, with the exception of Congressman Payne, that the 

actual cost of the ticket was significantly higher. 

103. In addition, according to Mr. Rodney, the cost charged to individuals to attend the conference for four days and three nights 

was $840 for double occupancy or $1085 for single occupancy. The 

cost of attendance included ‘‘room accommodations, meals, and admission to the Conference.’’ However, these figures were not disVerDate Aug 31 2005 14:33 Mar 09, 2010 Jkt 054330 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 P:\54-330\REVIEW~1\54-330.TXT 54-330

steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.045
45 

95Member/Officer Post-Travel Disclosure Form signed by Representative Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick (Nov. 20, 2008) (Exhibit 1 at 09–2567 0002). 96Memorandum from Carib News Foundation to Representatives Rangel, Thompson, Payne 

and Kilpatrick and Delegate Christensen (Nov. 18, 2008) (Exhibit 1 at 09–2567 0004–0005). 97Flight Reservation for Representative Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick (Nov. 5, 2008) (Exhibit 24 

at 09–2567 0273). 

closed pre-travel to the Members or the Standards Committee, nor 

were these figures disclosed to the Members after the conference. 

B. INFORMATION REQUIRED FROM THE CONGRESSIONAL TRAVELER

104. On her Member/Officer Post-Travel Disclosure Form,95 Representative Kilpatrick certified her travel cost as the following: 

105. These figures are identical to the ones provided to Congresswoman Kilpatrick from Mr. Rodney on November 18, 2008.96

106. However, documents from Congresswoman Kilpatrick’s office show her airline ticket cost $626.15, not $410.97 Representative 

Kilpatrick had copies of her flight itinerary showing this cost and 

the receipt for the tickets themselves in her files. 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.046 54330.047
46 

98 Id. at 09–2567 0271. 99Memorandum of Interview of Representative Carolyn Kilpatrick (May 14, 2009) (Exhibit 2 

at 09–2567 0032). 100 13th Annual Caribbean Multi-National Business Conference Registration Form of Representative Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick (Exhibit 22 at 09–2567 0275). 

107. Also in her files is a fax cover sheet that indicates she was 

sent the itinerary that showed the cost.98

108. Representative Kilpatrick told the OCE that, as a matter of 

practice, staff gave her copies of her itinerary before any flight.99

109. According to the registration document in Congresswoman 

Kilpatrick’s office files, her lodging, a ‘‘Conference Package Suite’’ 

cost $1198, not $580 (which includes housing and registration) as 

reported.100


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.048
47 

101 Memorandum of Interview of Representative Carolyn Kilpatrick (May 14, 2009) (Exhibit 

2 at 09–2567 0032). 102 Id. at 09–2567 0031. 103 House Ethics Manual (2008) at 101. 

110. Representative Kilpatrick told the OCE that she gave her 

scheduler instructions as to what type of room she wanted.101 Representative Kilpatrick also confirmed that she stayed in a suite at 

the conference.102

V. MORE THAN ONE FAMILY MEMBER ACCOMPANIED

CONGRESSWOMAN KILPATRICK ON THE TRIP

111. Pursuant to the House Ethics Manual: 

It is permissible for a Member, officer, or employee participating in officially connected travel paid for by a private source 

to be accompanied by a relative on the trip (House Rule 25, 

clause 5(b)(4)(D)) . . . Further, this provision allows the acceptance of expenses for only one relative. For example, a Member, 

officer, or employee, if offered by the sponsor, may accept expenses for a spouse or one child only, not a spouse and a child. 

The travel expenses paid for a relative must be specified by the 

private source and traveler on the pre-travel forms and reported 

on travel disclosure forms in the same manner as those paid for 

the Member, officer, or employee.103


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.049
48 

104 E-mail from Andrea Bragg to Patricia Louis (Oct. 31, 2008 12:14 PM EST) (Exhibit 17 at 

09–2567 0277.1). 105Member/Officer Post-Travel Disclosure Form signed by Representative Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick (Nov. 20, 2008) (Exhibit 1 at 09–2567 0002). 106Memorandum of Interview of Representative Carolyn Kilpatrick (May 14, 2009) (Exhibit 

2 at 09–2567 0031). 107 House Ethics Manual (2008) at 101. 108Member/Officer Post-Travel Disclosure Form signed by Representative Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick (Nov. 20, 2008) (Exhibit 1 at 09–2567 0002). 

112. Documents obtained from Mr. Rodney indicate that Congresswoman Kilpatrick brought her daughter and infant granddaughter with her as ‘‘accompanying relatives.’’ 104

113. This fact was not disclosed on her pre- or post-travel disclosure forms. On these forms Congresswoman Kilpatrick listed her 

sister as her accompanying relative.105

114. Congresswoman Kilpatrick confirmed in an interview with 

the OCE that in fact she brought her daughter and granddaughter.106

115. By bringing her daughter and granddaughter to the conference, there is substantial reason to believe that Congresswoman 

Kilpatrick violated the limitation that a Member may only bring 

one family member with them on privately sponsored travel.107

VI. CARIB NEWS FOUNDATION, AS A PRIVATE FOUNDATION, WAS

PROHIBITED FROM PAYING FOR CONGRESSWOMAN KILPATRICK’S

TRAVEL

116. The Carib News Foundation is identified as the ‘‘sponsor’’ of 

this conference on at least three forms filed with the Committee on 

Standards of Official Conduct: (1) the ‘‘Private Sponsor Travel Certification Form,’’; (2) the ‘‘Privately Sponsored Travel: Travel 

Form,’’ and; (3) the ‘‘Member/Officer Post-Travel Disclosure 

Form.’’ 108

117. According to a query of the New York State’s Office of the 

Secretary of State, Mr. Rodney appears to operate two organizations—the ‘‘Carib News, Inc’’ which operates a newspaper and the 

‘‘Carib News Charities, Inc’’ which also may operate under the 

name ‘‘Carib News Foundation.’’ The OCE has not been able to 

identify any additional activity, other than the annual Caribbean 

Multi-National Business Conference, in which the latter organization is involved. Furthermore, while ‘‘Carib News Charities, Inc’’ / 

‘‘Carib News Foundation’’ is listed with New York’s Office of the 

Secretary of State as a domestic not-for-profit corporation, it is not 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS54330.050
49 

109 Letter from IRS to OCE (Apr. 17, 2009) (Exhibit 8 at 09–2567 0106–0118.2). 110 Online Version of Publication 78 (Accessed online on June 5, 2009 at http://www.irs.gov/ 

app/pub-78/) (Exhibit 8 at 09–2567 0118.1–0118.2). 111 26 U.S.C. §§ 501 and 509. 112 26 U.S.C. §§ 4941 and 4946. 113 26 U.S.C. § 4941(d)(1)(F). The Code imposes a tax (currently 10 percent of the amount involved) on the illegal payments, with later penalties (up to $20,000 per act of self-dealing) for 

failure to pay back the foundation. The tax is imposed on the disqualified person, including a 

government official if the official participates in the act of self-dealing knowingly. 114 The payment or reimbursement of travel expenses for travel solely from one point in the 

United States to another point in the United States is excepted from the definition of self-dealing provided that the payment or reimbursement does not exceed the actual cost of the transportation involved and provided the amount for all other traveling expenses does not exceed 125 

percent of the maximum amount payable under section 5702 of title 5, United States Code, for 

like travel by employees of the United States. 26 U.S.C. § 4941(d)(2)(G)(vii). 115Memorandum from Ethics Counsel at the National Institutes of Health to Deputy Ethics 

Counsels at NIH (Jun. 2, 2000) (Exhibit 25 at 09–2567 0279–0281). 116Memorandum of Interview of Representative Carolyn Kilpatrick (May 14, 2009) (Exhibit 

2 at 09–2567 0031). 

listed, as required by law, with the New York State Charities Bureau. In addition, there is no evidence that the organization has 

filed a tax return with the IRS, under either name, since 2005.109

According to Publication 78 of the IRS, a list of all charities claiming 501(c) status, Carib Charities, Inc is a private foundation.110

118. Every organization that qualifies for tax exemption described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code is defined 

as a private foundation unless the organization falls into one of the 

categories specifically excluded from the definition under section 

509(a).111 In effect, the definition divides 501(c)(3) organizations 

into two classes: private foundations and public charities. Private 

foundations are generally funded through a single donor, family or 

corporation and operate through investment income; whereas, public charities are typically funded and operated through diversified 

support from governmental sources and the general public. 

119. There are several restrictions that are placed on private 

foundations. At issue here is the restriction on ‘‘self-dealing’’ between a disqualified person (the definition of which includes Members of Congress) and a private foundation.112 The Code defines the 

act of ‘‘self-dealing’’ to include any direct or indirect agreement to 

make any payment of money (including reimbursement of expenses) or other property by a private foundation to a government 

official.113 Although framed as a tax provision, the statute essentially bars certain federal employees and federally elected officials 

from receiving compensation, including reimbursements for international travel, from a private foundation. 114

120. As such, it appears that the Carib News Foundation’s payment of travel expenses for Representative Kilpatrick and her acceptance of payment potentially violated the Internal Revenue 

Code. 

121. The Board infers from the fact that the Standards Committee approved the reimbursement that the Standards Committee 

is unaware of this restriction. The Board notes, however, that its 

own research revealed that numerous other ethics-related entities 

in the federal government are aware of this restriction, and have 

for some time been enforcing it.115

122. Congresswoman Kilpatrick told the OCE that she was unaware of any limitations on the ability of private foundations to 

pay for overseas travel by government officials.116


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS
50 

123. The Board notes that these facts show failures at multiple 

points by multiple parties in complying with and enforcing the 

travel rules. Inaccurate information was provided by the Carib 

News Foundation to Members and the Standards Committee. Congresswoman Kilpatrick certified inaccurate information to the 

Standards Committee and failed to disclose the number of family 

members accompanying her. The counsel to the former Chair of the 

Standards Committee intervened in the review process in a way 

that both frustrated the process in 2007 and set a pattern of obfuscation that continued in 2008. Finally, the Standards Committee 

appears unaware of limitations on the ability of private foundations 

to pay for overseas travel by Members. 

124. For all these reasons, the Board concludes further review of 

this matter by the Standards Committee is appropriate. 


steuser on CDPSPC2PFRM with REPORTS
EXHIBIT 1 

09-2567 0001

51

09-2567 0002

53
09-2567 0003

54
09-2567 0004

55
09-2567 0005

56
09-2567 0006

57
09-2567 0007

58
09-2567 0008

59
09-2567 0009

60
09-2567 0010

61
09-2567 0011

62
09-2567 0012

63
09-2567 0013

64
09-2567 0014

65
09-2567 0015

66
09-2567 0016

67
09-2567 0017

68
09-2567 0018

69
09-2567 0019

70
09-2567 0020

71
09-2567 0021

72
09-2567 0022

73
09-2567 0023

74
09-2567 0024

75
09-2567 0025

76
09-2567 0026

77
09-2567 0027

78
09-2567 0028

79
09-2567 0029

80
EXHIBIT 2 

09-2567 0030

81

83
84
85
86
EXHIBIT 3 

09-2567 0035

87

09-2567 0036

89
09-2567 0037

90
09-2567 0038

91
09-2567 0039

92
09-2567 0040

93
09-2567 0041

94
09-2567 0042

95
09-2567 0043

96
09-2567 0044

97
09-2567 0045

98
09-2567 0046

99
09-2567 0047

100
09-2567 0048

101
09-2567 0049

102
09-2567 0050

103
09-2567 0051

104
09-2567 0052

105
09-2567 0053

106
09-2567 0054

107
09-2567 0055

108
09-2567 0056

109
09-2567 0057

110
09-2567 0058

111
09-2567 0059

112
09-2567 0060

113
09-2567 0061

114
EXHIBIT 4 

09-2567 0062

115

117
118
119
120
THIS PAGE

INTENTIONALLY

LEFT BLANK 

09-2567 0067

121

EXHIBIT 5 

09-2567 0068

123

09-2567 0069

125
09-2567 0070

126
09-2567 0071

127
09-2567 0072

128
09-2567 0073

129
09-2567 0074

130
09-2567 0075

131
09-2567 0076

132
09-2567 0077

133

EXHIBIT 6 

09-2567 0078

135

137
138
EXHIBIT 7 

09-2567 0081

139

141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
EXHIBIT 8 

09-2567 0102

161

163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
EXHIBIT 9 

09-2567 0119

181

183
184
185
186
187
THIS PAGE

INTENTIONALLY

LEFT BLANK 

09-2567 0125

188
EXHIBIT 10 

09-2567 0126

189

191
192
193
194
EXHIBIT 11 

09-2567 0131

195

197
198
199
200
201
THIS PAGE

INTENTIONALLY

LEFT BLANK 

09-2567 0137

202
EXHIBIT 12 

09-2567 0138

203

205
206
207
208
209
210
211
THIS PAGE

INTENTIONALLY

LEFT BLANK 

09-2567 0146

212
EXHIBIT 13 

09-2567 0147

213

215
216
217
218
EXHIBIT 14 

09-2567 0152

219

221
222
223
224
225

EXHIBIT 15 

09-2567 0151.7

227

229
230
231
232
233
234
EXHIBIT 16 

09-2567 0151.14

235

237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245

EXHIBIT 17 

09-2567 0152

247

249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
EXHIBIT 18 

09-2567 0191

287

289
290
291
292
293
294
EXHIBIT 19 

09-2567 0198

295



















EXHIBIT 20 

09-2567 0216

315

317
318
THIS PAGE

INTENTIONALLY

LEFT BLANK 

09-2567 0219

319

EXHIBIT 21 

09-2567 0220

321

323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
EXHIBIT 22 

09-2567 0233

335

337
338
339
340
341
342
THIS PAGE

INTENTIONALLY

LEFT BLANK 

09-2567 0240

343
THIS PAGE

INTENTIONALLY

LEFT BLANK 

09-2567 0241

344
THIS PAGE

INTENTIONALLY

LEFT BLANK 

09-2567 0242

345
THIS PAGE

INTENTIONALLY

LEFT BLANK 

09-2567 0243

346
THIS PAGE

INTENTIONALLY

LEFT BLANK 

09-2567 0244

347
THIS PAGE

INTENTIONALLY

LEFT BLANK 

09-2567 0245

348
EXHIBIT 23 

09-2567 0246

349

351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371

EXHIBIT 24 

09-2567 0270

373

375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
EXHIBIT 25 

09-2567 0278

383

385
386