alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Baku-T'bilisi-Ceyhan

Pipeline (BTC)

Friendship

Friendship (Druzhba)

Friendship I

Friendship II

Adria

Adria

Adria

Northern E

Caspian Pipeline C

Friendship (Druzhba) II

Trans-Alpine

(TAL)

Boundary representnot necessarily auth

200 Kilometers

200 Miles 

100

100

0

0

Pipeline alignments are approximate.

Existing pipelineExisting bypass pipelinePlanned pipelineProposed bypass pipelineTanker routeSelected refinerySelected tanker terminal

Adriatic Sea

Aegean

Sea

Ionian

Sea

Baltic Sea

North Sea

Black Sea

Mediterranean

Sea

Tyrrhenian

Sea

Sea of

Azov

Ceyhan

RUSS

UKRAINE

DENMARK SWEDEN

NETH.

FRANCE

LUX.

GERMANY

POLAND

RUSSIA

LITHUANIA

LATVIA

SWITZ.

AUSTRIA

ITALY

SLOVENIA SLOVENIA HUNGARY

CROATIA BOSNIA

AND

HERZEGOVINA

ALBANIA

GREECE TURKEY

MOLDOVA

BULGARIA

ROMANIA

SYRIA 

BEL.

GEOR

SLOVAKIA

CZECH

REPUBLIC

BELARUS

F.Y.R.O.M.*

*The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

Thessaloniki Alexandroupolis

Vlore

Novorossiysk

Burgas

Istanbul

Ceyhan

Trieste

Tuapse

Odesa Kherson

Bat’umi

Constanta

Gdansk

Brody

Sup’sa

Batman

Erzurum

Aliaga

Kiev

Minsk

Skopje

Warsaw

Ljubljana Ljubljana

Budapest

Zagreb

Sofia

Bucharest

Athens

Ankara

Bratislava Bratislava

Berlin

Prague

Tirana

Moscow

Kocaeli

(Izmit)

Yuzhnyy

Rostock

Leipzig

Omisalj

Belgrade

Proposed Bosporus Bypass Pipelines

Plock

YUGOSLAVIA

Samsun

Odesa

Bratislava

SLOVENIA

Vienna

Karlsruhe

Ingolstadt

Rome

Ljubljana

Zagreb

Saros

Kiyikoy Bosporus

Dardanelles
Exhibit
        23.1
   CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
   We
        hereby
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
        Form
        S-3 (No. 33-11717) of Middlesex Water Company of our reports dated March
        10, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the
        effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appear
        in this
        Form 10-K.
  
 /s/
        Beard
        Miller Company LLP
 Beard
        Miller Company LLP
 Reading,
        Pennsylvania
 March
        10,
        2008
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4262-4267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2078]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Revised Non-Foreign Overseas Per Diem Rates

AGENCY: DoD Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee.

ACTION: Notice of revised non-foreign overseas per diem rates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee is 
publishing Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin Number 191. This 
bulletin lists revisions in per diem rates prescribed for U.S. 
Government employees for official travel in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto 
Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands and Possessions of the United 
States. Bulletin Number 191 is being published in the Federal Register 
to assure that travelers are paid per diem at the most current rates.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 1, 1997.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document gives notice of revisions in 
per diem rates prescribed by the Per Diem Travel and Transportation 
Allowance Committee for non-foreign areas outside the continental 
United States. It supersedes Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin 
Number 190. Distribution of Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletins by 
mail was discontinued. Per Diem Bulletins published periodically in the 
Federal Register now constitute the only notification of revisions in 
per diem rates to agencies and establishments outside the Department of 
Defense. For more information or questions about per diem rates, please 
contact your local travel office. The text of the Bulletin follows:
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M

[[Page 4263]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN29JA97.001



[[Page 4264]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN29JA97.002



[[Page 4265]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN29JA97.003



[[Page 4266]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN29JA97.004



[[Page 4267]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN29JA97.005



    Dated: January 23, 1997
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-2078 Filed 1-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21198]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. FA94-20-002]


Georgia Power Company; Notice of Filing

August 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on June 10, 1997, Georgia Power Company tendered 
for filing its refund report in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before August 15, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21198 Filed 8-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 99-7773.

#### Fiorani *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Elsie McClelland v. HERSCHEDE HALL CLOCK COMPANY et al.

No. 49187.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 9, 1977.

Ben F. Hilbun, Jr., Starkville, for appellant.

Daniel, Coker, Horton, Bell & Dukes, Roger C. Clapp, Jackson, for appellees.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Oktibbeha County; Joe 0. Sams, Sr., Judge.

Before PATTERSON, P. J., and ROBERTSON and BROOM, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, Kent H. Harle, Chief Executive Officer of Redline Performance Products, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify, that to my knowledge:

    (1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter
        ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report"), fully complies with the
        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934, as amended; and

    (2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.

Date: February 12, 2004           /s/ Kent H. Harle
                                  -----------------
                                  Kent H. Harle
                                  Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
or as separate disclosure documents. A signed original of this written statement
has been provided to Redline Performance Products, Inc. and will be retained by
Redline Performance Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Thomas
      W. Martin, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of ICON Capital
      Corp., the General Partner of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly
      Report of ICON Income Fund Eight B L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q/A
      for
      the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the Partnership.








*Dated:
      December 11, 2007*





*/s/
      Thomas W. Martin*


Thomas
      W.
      Martin


Chairman,
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the General Partner


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


General
      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight B L.P.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21061]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Two Consent Decrees Pursuant to the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 
1980

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, and 42 U.S.C. 
9622(d)(2), notice is hereby given that on July 25, 1997, two Consent 
Decrees were lodged in United States v. Dixie-Narco, et al., Civil 
Action No. MJG-96-3310, with the United States District Court for the 
District of Maryland.
    The Consent Decrees resolve claims against Noxell, Corporation and 
Dixie-Narco, Inc. under section 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended 
(``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9607, with respect to the Drumco Superfund Site 
(``Drumco Site'') located in Baltimore and in Anne Arundel County, 
Maryland. Pursuant to the terms of the Consent Decrees, Noxell 
Corporation and Dixie-Narco, Inc. will make payments of $400,000 and 
$360,000, respectively, to the United States for costs incurred in 
connection with the Site.
    The Department of Justice will receive comments relating to the 
proposed Consent Decrees for a period of thirty days from the date of 
publication of this notice. Comments should be addressed to the 
Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to United 
States v. Dixie-Narco, et al., Civil Action No. MJG-96-3310, Ref. No. 
90-11-2-1140. The proposed Consent Decrees may be examined at the 
office of the United States Attorney, District of Maryland, 604 United 
States Courthouse, 101 W. Lombard Street, Baltimore, Maryland. Copies 
of the Consent Decree may also be examined and obtained by mail at the 
Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 
20005 (202-624-0892) and the offices of the Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region III, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 
19107. When requesting a copy by mail, please enclose a check in the 
amount of $4.00 (twenty-five cents per page reproduction costs) for 
either Consent Decree, or $8.00 for both Consent Decrees, payable to 
the ``Consent Decree Library.''
Walker B. Smith,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-21061 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
jfourtf) Court of

Antonio,

August 1,2014

No.04-13-00358-CR

Perla Judith Pena,

Appellant

v.

The State of Texas,

Appellee

Trial Court Case No. 12-CRS-440

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and has determined that oral

argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the

cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on September 10, 2014, to the following panel:

Justice Marion, Justice Barnard, and Justice Chapa. AH parties will be notified of the Court's

decision in this appeal in accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 48.

Either party may file motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that

oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues

presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Such motion should be filed within ten (10)

days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED on August 1,2014.

Sandee Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, have hereunto set my hand and a/fixed the seal o/the said court on this August 1, 2014.
#### Ex parte Norman FAVORS, Jr.

77-314.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Feb. 24, 1978.

BLOODWORTH, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and FAULKNER, AL-MON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002







In connection
with the Quarterly Report of nFinanSe Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended October 3, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raymond P. Springer, in my
capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Raymond P.
      SpringerDate:  November
      13, 2009
            Raymond
      P. Springer
              Secretary
      and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1126 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1126

  To provide that no Federal funds may be expended for the payment or 
 reimbursement of a drug that is prescribed to a sex offender for the 
              treatment of sexual or erectile dysfunction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2005

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mrs. Clinton) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide that no Federal funds may be expended for the payment or 
 reimbursement of a drug that is prescribed to a sex offender for the 
              treatment of sexual or erectile dysfunction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NO FEDERAL FUNDS FOR DRUGS PRESCRIBED TO SEX OFFENDERS FOR 
              THE TREATMENT OF SEXUAL OR ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION.

    (a) Restriction.--
            (1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        law, no Federal funds may be expended for the payment or 
        reimbursement, including payment or reimbursement under the 
        programs described in paragraph (2), of a drug that is 
        prescribed to an individual described in paragraph (3) for the 
        treatment of sexual or erectile dysfunction.
            (2) Programs described.--The programs described in this 
        paragraph are the medicaid program, the medicare program, the 
        Federal employees health benefits program, the Defense Health 
        Program, the program of medical care furnished by the Secretary 
        of Veterans Affairs, health related programs administered by 
        the Indian Health Service, health related programs funded under 
        the Public Health Service Act, and any other Federal health 
        program.
            (3) Individual described.--An individual described in this 
        paragraph is an individual who has a conviction for sexual 
        abuse, sexual assault, or any other sexual offense.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) shall apply to drugs dispensed 
on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

833 

KA 10-01454 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRANDON STILTS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

CHRISTOPHER S. BRADSTREET, ROCHESTER, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

JOHN C. TUNNEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATH (AMANDA M. CHAFEE OF COUNSEL),

FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Steuben County Court (Marianne

Furfure, A.J.), rendered April 10, 2009. The judgment revoked

defendant’s sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of

imprisonment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking the term

of probation previously imposed upon his conviction of rape in the

second degree (Penal Law § 130.30 [1]) and sentencing him to a

determinate term of incarceration, following a hearing on the issue

whether he violated the conditions of his probation. We reject

defendant’s contention that County Court erred in denying his request

for substitution of counsel. The record establishes that the court

“made the requisite inquiry to determine whether defendant had good

cause for substitution” (People v Henderson, 77 AD3d 1311, 1311), and

“ ‘thereafter reasonably concluded that defendant’s . . . objections

had no merit or substance’ ” (id.). The denial of a defendant’s

request for substitution of assigned counsel does not constitute an

abuse of the court’s discretion where, as in this case, “tensions

between client and counsel on the eve of [a hearing] were the

precipitate of differences over strategy” (People v Medina, 44 NY2d

199, 208; see People v Shorter, 6 AD3d 1204, 1205, lv denied 3 NY3d

648). We reject defendant’s further contention that he was denied

effective assistance of counsel (see generally People v Baldi, 54 NY2d

137, 147). Finally, we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh

or severe.

Entered: July 1, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 32
----------



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  First   Litchfield   Financial
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  we, Joseph J. Greco,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company,  and Carroll A. Pereira,  Principal  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Joseph J. Greco                                /s/ Carroll A. Pereira
-------------------                                ----------------------
Joseph J. Greco                                    Carroll A. Pereira
President and Chief Executive Officer              Principal Financial Officer
May 14, 2007                                       May 14, 2007


The foregoing  certificate  is furnished  solely for purposes of complying  with
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  and  for  no  other  purpose
whatsoever.  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein or in any
of the Company's  previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  that might incorporate the
Company's  future  filings,  including  this Report on Form 10-Q, in whole or in
part,  this  Certificate  shall not be  incorporated  by reference into any such
filings.


                                       27
#### STATE ex rel. David BROWN, Jr. v. Hon. Edwin LOMBARD, Clerk of Court, Orleans Parish, Criminal District Court.

No. 60448.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 14, 1977.

In re: David Brown, Jr. applying for writ of mandamus.

Relator is not entitled to a free transcript under the law.

Writ denied.

DIXON, J.,

concurs in the denial. If defendant has been denied an appeal, he may apply for an out-of-time appeal, and then, if needed, apply for a transcript.
Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.62 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 2 (the
“Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement dated February 18, 2004 (as amended, “Employment Agreement”), by and between Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), and Bruce C. Cozadd (the “Executive”) is made and entered into on August 24, 2007. 
 RECITALS 
 A. The Company retains the services of the Executive pursuant to the Employment Agreement. 
 C. The parties now wish to amend the Employment Agreement with regard to the amount of time the Executive will devote to the Company. 
 AGREEMENT 
 1. Section 3.5 of the
Employment Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 
 3.5. Commitment. During the
Executive’s employment by the Company, the Executive shall devote between 75% and 100% of Executive’s business energies, interest, abilities and productive time to the proper and efficient performance of Executive’s duties under this
Agreement, the exact percentage within such range as agreed orally or by e-mail or other writing from time to time by the Executive and the Company’s Board of Directors; provided, however, the Executive may engage in other outside business
activity listed on Exhibit B hereto. If the Executive wishes to engage in any other outside work, the Executive agrees to notify and consult with the Board of Directors and shall not engage in any such other outside work without the prior
approval of the Board of Directors. The Executive and the Board of Directors have agreed that effective September 1, 2007, Executive shall devote 90% of Executive’s business energies, interest, abilities and productive time to the proper
and efficient performance of Executive’s duties under this Agreement. 
 2. Except as set forth above, the Employment Agreement remains
in effect in its form prior to the date hereof. 
  







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment to be effective on September 1, 2007.

  

			
	JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
		
	 /s/
	 	Carol A. Gamble
	By:	 	Carol A. Gamble
	Its:	 	Senior Vice President and General Counsel
	
	EXECUTIVE:
		
	/s/	 	Bruce C. Cozadd
		 	Bruce C. Cozadd