alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Corporation. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                  Douglas Stewart                                    |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Douglas                  Stewart, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                                                    |   |
|   | Date:  February                  14, 2008                     |   |
|   |                                                                    |   |
|   |                                                                    |   |
|   |                                                                    |   |
|   | /s/                  Debra A. Geuy                                      |   |
|   | Debra                  A. Geuy, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer   |
|   |                                                                    |   |
|   | Date:  February                  14, 2008                     |   |

----
No. 46545.

#### Protest 66117-K of B. Altman & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the photo frames in question are chiefly used on the table, in the kitchen, or in the household-for utilitarian purposes. They were therefore held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 following Abstract 38069.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23

(RS LOGO) RYDER SCOTT COMPANY                                FAX (303) 623-4258
          ---------------------
          PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

<Table>
<S>                       <C>
600 SEVENTEENTH STREET    SUITE 161ON    DENVER, COLORADO 80202-5416    TELEPHONE (303) 623-9147
</Table>




                      CONSENT OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.


         We consent to the use on the Form 10-K of Sterling Drilling Fund 1983-1
of our reserve report and all schedules, exhibits, and attachments thereto
incorporated by reference of Form 10-K and to any reference made to us on Form
10-K as a result of such incorporation.

                                           Very truly yours,


                                          /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

                                          RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.



Denver, Colorado
March 28, 2003




<Table>
<S>                               <C>
1100 LOUISIANA, SUITE 3800        HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5218        TEL (713) 651-9191        FAX (713) 651-0849
3700, 700-2ND STREET, S.W.        CALGARY, ALBERTA T2P 2W2         TEL (403) 262-2799        FAX (403) 262-2790
</Table>
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 96 (Thursday, May 17, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 29275]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11876]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 272

[EPA-R06-RCRA-2011-0484; FRL-9652-8]

Oklahoma: Incorporation by Reference of State Hazardous Waste 
Management Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to codify in the regulations entitled 
``Approved State Hazardous Waste Management Programs'', Oklahoma's 
authorized hazardous waste program. The EPA will incorporate by 
reference into the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) those provisions 
of the State regulations that are authorized and that the EPA will 
enforce under the Solid Waste Disposal Act, commonly referred to as the 
Resource Conversation and Recovery Act (RCRA).

DATES: Send written comments by June 18, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Alima Patterson, Region 6 Regional 
Authorization Coordinator, or Julia Banks Codification Coordinator, 
State/Tribal Oversight Section (6PD-O), Multimedia Planning and 
Permitting Division, EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 
75202-2733, Phone number: (214) 665-8533 or (214) 665-8178. You may 
also submit comments electronically or through hand delivery/courier; 
please follow the detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the 
immediate final rule which is located in the Rules section of this 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alima Patterson, (214) 665-8533.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of 
this Federal Register, the EPA is codifying and incorporating by 
reference the State's hazardous waste program as an immediate final 
rule. The EPA did not make a proposal prior to the immediate final rule 
because we believe these actions are not controversial and do not 
expect comments that oppose them. We have explained the reasons for 
this codification and incorporation by reference in the preamble to the 
immediate final rule. Unless we get written comments which oppose this 
incorporation by reference during the comment period, the immediate 
final rule will become effective on the date it establishes, and we 
will not take further action on this proposal. If we get comments that 
oppose these actions, we will withdraw the immediate final rule and it 
will not take effect. We will then respond to public comments in a 
later final rule based on this proposal. You may not have another 
opportunity for comment. If you want to comment on this action, you 
must do so at this time.

    Dated: March 16, 2012.
Al Armendariz,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2012-11876 Filed 5-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
EXHIBIT 99.3
                                  CERTIFICATION

         Pursuant to Section  906 of the Public  Company  Accounting  Reform and
Investor  Protection  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.  1350,  as adopted),  Gerald D.
Brasuell, the President of OpticNet, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that,
to the best of his knowledge:

1.       The  Company's  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q for the  period  ended
         December 28, 2002, to which this  Certification  is attached as Exhibit
         99.3 (the "Quarterly Report"),  fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
         as amended; and

2.       The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,  in
         all material  respects,  the financial  condition of the Company at the
         end of the  period  covered  by the  Quarterly  Report  and  results of
         operations  of the  Company  for the period  covered  by the  Quarterly
         Report.

Dated: February 10, 2003
       --------------------

/s/ Gerald D. Brasuell
---------------------------
Gerald D. Brasuell
President

Page 22 of 23
#### Eddie Willie TAYLOR, Michael F.X. Hogan, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America, Intervenor-Appellant, and State of Arizona; Terry Stewart, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 97-16069, 97-16071.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 3, 1998.

Before: HUG, Chief Judge.

*1060ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, *Taylor v. United States,*143 F.3d 1178 (9th Cir.1998) is withdrawn.
No. 00-900.

#### Fultz *v.*ABB Power T & D, Inc., et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 10.4

                              LADD FURNITURE, INC.

                         1998 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN

                                 PLAN HIGHLIGHTS


1. Incentive payments based on financial performance and individual performance
as follows:

                  For Corporate Participants
                           o  achievement of PBTDA targets
                           o  achievement of individual objectives

                  For Operating Group and Company Participants
                           o  achievement of PBTDA targets
                           o  LADD PBTDA targets
                           o  achievement of individual objectives

2.       No individual objective incentive payments will be made to any
         individual if the operating unit to which the individual is assigned
         does not achieve minimum PBTDA targets. Incentive payment expense will
         be accrued in results before calculation of profit.

3.       Maximum incentives range from 20% to 120% of January 1, 1998 base
         salary. Incentive payments are based on achieving performance criteria
         established by senior management and approved by the Board of
         Directors.

4.       Program includes $50,000 discretionary incentive pool for extraordinary
         performance by LADD employees not covered by the Management Incentive
         Plan.

5.       Incentives earned in 1998 will be paid in cash after completion of
         annual audit (not later than March 31, 1999).

6.       In the event of a transfer of a participant during the fiscal year to
         an operating unit other than the unit in which originally a Plan
         participant, an appropriate adjustment will be made in Incentive Plan
         eligibility pro-rata for the time worked in each unit.

7.       In the event of a promotion of a participant within the same operating
         unit, an appropriate adjustment will be made in Incentive Plan
         eligibility pro-rata. In the event of a demotion which would place
         participants in a position substantially different from that in which
         they were nominated as a participant, an appropriate adjustment may be
         made as to the amount of incentive payment for which they are eligible
         as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

8.       Participants will forfeit all income from plan if employment is
         terminated prior to January 1, 1999 for any reason other than death,
         disability or retirement (over age 55).

9.       The 1998 Management Incentive Plan only applies to fiscal year 1998.
No. 99-1197.

#### Spencer *v.*New York City Transit Authority et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 149 (Monday, August 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20455]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Notice of Application for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart Q During 
the Week Ending July 25, 1997

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
Q of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 
CFR 302.1701 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming 
Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each 
application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.

    Docket Number: OST-97-2765.
    Date Filed: July 25, 1997.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: August 22, 1997.
    Description: Application of American International Airways, Inc., 
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. Section 41102 and Subpart Q of the Regulations, 
applies for an amendment to its certificate authority for Route 677 
authorizing it to provide scheduled foreign air transportation of 
property and mail between a point or points in the United States and a 
point or points in Singapore, Thailand, and Indonesia.

    Docket Number: OST-97-2764.
    Date Filed: July 25, 1997.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: August 22, 1997.
    Description: Joint Application of Federal Express Corporation and 
Florida West International Airways, Inc., pursuant to 49 U.S.C. Section 
41105 and Subpart Q of the Procedural Regulations, requests approval of 
the transfer to Federal Express of certain certificate authority now 
held by FWIA, authorizing FWIA to provide scheduled all-cargo foreign 
air transportation between the United States and Colombia.
Paulette V. Twine,
Chief Documentary Services.
[FR Doc. 97-20455 Filed 8-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
----

----

**UNITED      STATES**

**SECURITIES      AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Washington,      D.C. 20549**

----

**Form      8-K**

**Current      Report**

----

**Pursuant      to Section 13 or 15(d)**

**of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

**February      22, 2007**

**Date      of Report (Date of earliest event reported)**

**FNB      Financial Services Corporation**

**(Exact      name of registrant as specified in its charter)**

**Commission      file number: **
***000-13086***

----

| **North                Carolina**                           | **56-1382275**                                          |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| **(State                of incorporation)**                 | **(I.R.S.                Employer Identification No.)** |
|                                                        |                                                    |
| **1501                Highwoods Boulevard, Suite 400**      |                                                    |
| **Greensboro,                North Carolina**               | **27410**                                               |
| **(Address                of principal executive offices)** | **(Zip                Code)**                           |

**(336)      369-0900**

**(Registrant's      telephone number, including area code)**

**This      Form 8-K has 3 pages.**

----

----

----

**ITEM      8.01: Other Events**

**ITEM      9.01(c):   Exhibit**

----

**S I G N A T U R E**

|   | **FNB                FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION**          |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (Registrant)                                                   |
|   |                                                           |
|   | By:                /s/ K. Dwight Willoughby                    |
|   |                                                           |
|   | K.                Dwight Willoughby                            |
|   | Senior                Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer |
|   | and                Controller                                  |
|   |                                                           |
|   |                                                           |
----

----

| 1.  | The      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934, as amended; and |
|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the LP. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May      12, 2010                                                                                                     |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                                             |   |   |
| /s/      Michael A. Reisner                                                                                                      |   |   |
| Michael      A. Reisner                                                                                                          |   |   |
| Co-Chief      Executive Officer and Co-PresidentICON      Capital Corp.General      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight BL.P. |
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-88918, 333-65912, 333-76633, 333-76635, 333-75763, 33-56693, 33-69840, and
33-31556 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 14, 2005, relating to the
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Smith International,
Inc. and management's report on the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Smith
International, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Houston, Texas
March 14, 2005
EXHIBIT 23(a)

CONSENT of INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements of
NCT  Group,  Inc.  and  subsidiaries  (the  "Company")  on Form S-8  (File  Nos.
33-64792,  333-90297,  333-11213,  333-47956 and 333-127252) of our report dated
March 3, 2006, with respect to the last paragraph of Note 13, March 23, 2006 and
with  respect to Note 26,  March 24,  2006,  on our  audits of the  consolidated
financial  statements and schedules as of December 31, 2004 and 2005 and for the
years ended  December 31,  2003,  2004 and 2005 which report is included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our report  includes an explanatory  paragraph about
the existence of substantial  doubt concerning the Company's ability to continue
as a going concern and an emphasis of matter  paragraph about the restatement of
2004 Financial Statements.





Eisner LLP


New York, New York
April 14, 2006
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To                my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,                in                all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of Atlantic BancGroup, Inc., as of and for the period covered by                the                report. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November                3, 2006 | /s/                Barry W. Chandler                                |
|------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 | Barry                W. Chandler                                    |
|                                                 | President                and Chief Executive                Officer |
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 2434

EDWARD S. COHN; STEPHEN N. GOLDBERG, Substitute Trustee; RICHARD E. SOLOMON, Substitute Trustee; RICHARD J. ROGERS, Substitute Trustee; RANDALL J. ROLLS, Substitute Trustee , Plaintiffs

- Appellees ,

v.
JOHN H. HARDING , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Ellen L. Hollander , District Judge. ( 1:17

- cv
- 03236

- ELH )

Submitted : February 15, 2018 Decided: February 16, 2018

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
John H. Harding , Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: John H. Harding seeks to appeal the district court’s order remanding this foreclosure proceeding to the Maryland state court from which it was removed. Generally, “[a]n order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is

no t reviewable on appeal or oth erwise.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2012). The Supreme Court has instructed that “§ 1447(d) must be read in pari materia with [28 U.S.C.] § 1447(c), so that only remands based on grounds specified in § 1447(c) are immune
from revie w under § 1447(d).” Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca , 516 U.S. 124, 127 (1995). Thus, § 1447(d) is tightly circumscribed to cover only remand orders within the scope of

. . . § 1447(c), based on (1) a district court’ s lack of subject matter jurisdicti on or (2) a defect in removal other than lack of subject matter jurisdiction that was raised by the motion of a party within 30 days after the notice of removal was filed.
Doe v. Blair , 819 F.3d 64, 66 (4th Cir. 2016) (internal quotation marks omitted).
“Whether a district court ’ s remand order is reviewable under § 1447(d) is not determined by whether the order explicitly cites § 1447(c) or not.” Borneman v. United States , 213 F.3d 819, 824 (4th Cir. 2000).
The district court determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over this case. Accordingly, we are without jurisdiction to review the remand order. We therefore deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal cont entions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED