alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 147 (Thursday, July 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41068]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20153]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Services, Notice of Meeting 
of the National Advisory General Medical Sciences Council

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the National Advisory General Medical Sciences Council, National 
Institute of General Medical Services, National Institutes of Health, 
on September 11-12, 1997, Natcher Building 45, Conference Rooms E1 and 
E2, Bethesda, Maryland.
    This meeting will be open to the public from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. on 
September 11, for the discussion of program policies and issues, 
opening remarks, report of the Director, NIGMS, and other business of 
Council. Attendance by the public will be limited to space available.
    In accordance with provisions set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 
552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. and sec. 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, the 
meeting will be closed to the public on September 11, from 8:30 a.m. to 
11:00 a.m., and also closed on September 12, (8:30 a.m. to 
adjournment), for the review, discussion, and evaluation of individual 
grant applications. Applications and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications, disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Mrs. Ann Dieffenbach, Public Information Officer, National 
Institute of General Medical Services, National Institutes of Health, 
Natcher Building, Room 3AS-43H, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, telephone: 
301-496-7301, fax 301-402-0224, will provide a summary of the meeting, 
and a roster of Council members. Individuals who plan to attend and 
need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other 
reasonable accommodations, should contact Mrs. Dieffenbach in advance 
of the meeting. Dr. W. Sue Shafer, Executive Secretary, NAGMS Council, 
National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Room 2AN-32C, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892, telephone: 301-594-4499 will provide 
substantive program information upon request.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.821, 
Biophysics and Physiological Sciences; 93.859, Pharmacological 
Sciences; 93.862, Genetics Research; 93.863, Cellular and Molecular 
Basis of Disease Research; 93.880, Minority Access Research Careers 
[MARC]; and 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support [MBRS]; 
Special Programs, 93.960)

    Dated: July 24, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-20153 Filed 7-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EX-10.7



 






EXHIBIT 10.7




JAG Media Holdings, Inc.

6865 S.W. 18th Street, Suite B13

Boca Raton, FL 33433




November 12, 2007




Stephen J. Schoepfer

c/o JAG Media Holdings, Inc.

6865 S.W. 18th Street, Suite B13

Boca Raton, FL 33433




     Re:      Extension of Amended and Restated Employment Agreement



Dear Steve:




     This letter sets forth an agreement amending your current Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement with JAG Media Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) dated August 31, 2001, as amended November
3, 2005 (the “Agreement”). Except as specifically agreed hereby, the Agreement, even though it has
by its terms expired, shall continue in full force and effect through August 31, 2008. Section
references below refer to sections in the Agreement.



     Section 1 shall read in full as follows:



     “1. Term. This Agreement will govern the principal terms and conditions of your employment
from August 31, 2004 until August 31, 2008 (the “Term”), and the termination thereof that occurs
during, and in certain as specified below, upon or following the expiration of the Term.”



     The term “Year 3” as used in Section 3 shall mean the year ending August 31, 2008.


     To indicate your agreement to the foregoing, please sign and return the enclosed copy of this
letter.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely yours,




JAG MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Thomas J. Mazzarisi
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Thomas J. Mazzarisi 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 	 
	 



Agreed to and accepted as of the

date first above written




	 	 	 
	/s/ Stephen J. Schoepfer

	 	 
	 	 	 
	STEPHEN J. SCHOEPFER
FIRST       | FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST, INC.         EXHIBIT 10.11
         INDUSTRIAL  | 354 Eisenhower Parkway
                     | P.O. Box 1639
                     | Livingston, New Jersey 07039
                     | 973/533-7111
                     | Fax 973/597-9660


SENT VIA FACSIMILE (201) 569-3224 AND REGULAR MAIL
--------------------------------------------------

November 17, 1999

Mr. Arnold M. Gans
Medical Nutrition, Inc.
10 West Forest Avenue
Englewood, NJ 07631

Re:      LEASE EXTENSION FOR:                        PROP#: 1254
         10 West Forest Avenue, Englewood, NJ        ID#MEDNU-1

Dear Mr. Gans:

It was my pleasure speaking with you regarding your future space requirements.
Per your request, enclosed please find a proposal to extend your lease as
follows:

Rentable Area:   7,500 square feet

New Lease Term:  1/1/2000 - 12/31/2004

New Base Rent:   Years 1,2,3  $65,625.00 N/N/N Annually  $5,468.75 N/N/N Monthly
                 Years 4,5    $67,500.00 N/N/N Annually  $5,625.00 N/N/N Monthly

Landlord Work:   Landlord shall perform the following work:
                      1)  Replace all exterior windows and frames
                      2)  Repair plumbing in men's bathroom
                      3)  Replace damaged ceiling tiles in office area
                      4)  Replace existing HVAC unit and both warehouse heaters.
                      5)  Repair loading dock area.

The Landlord shall, at Tenant own cost and expense, enter into a periodic
maintenance agreement with a reputable heating, ventilating and air-conditioning
contractor, which contractor shall provide for a minimum of two (2) inspections
per year.

All other terms and conditions of your existing Lease dated, October 4, 1984, as
amended will remain in full force and effect. Please sign below as to your
approval of the above and return to me via facsimile and both originals by
regular mail. This offer will be valid until November 19, 1999, thereafter
subject to change.

First Industrial would like to thank you for your continued occupancy.

Sincerely,
FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST, INC.

/s/ MICHAEL SARGIS
-----------------------------
Michael Sargis
Leasing Specialist
                              ACKNOWLEDGED & APPROVED:

                              /s/ ARNOLD GANS                         11-19-99
                              -------------------------------      -------------
                              Mr. Arnold M. Gans
                              Medical Nutrition, Inc.

                              /s/                                     11-29-99
                              -------------------------------      -------------
                              First Industrial L.P. Landlord
#### Gimbel Bros., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6923.

Entry No. 1478/2.

Invoice dated London, England, September 1945,

Certified September 1945.

Entered at Philadelphia, Pa., October 23, 1945.

(Decided February 26, 1947)

*Fred Bennett*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

*413On the agreed fabts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          59,965
<SECURITIES>                                   199,865
<RECEIVABLES>                                   95,593
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,226
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               384,254
<PP&E>                                          96,307
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,862
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 453,956
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          155,888
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           933
<OTHER-SE>                                     293,439
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   453,956
<SALES>                                        259,335
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               411,816
<CGS>                                           22,020
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               277,027
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (12,721)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 84,642
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,393
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             59,249
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    59,249
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65


</TABLE>
No. 99-7771.

#### Shaw *v.*Corcoran, Warden, et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board
of Directors and Stockholders
Medical Nutrition USA, Inc.

We consent to
the incorporation by reference to the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.
333-134678) of our report dated April 28, 2008, with respect to the financial
statements of Medical Nutrition USA, Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended January 31, 2008.

|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Amper,
 Politziner & Mattia, P.C.
|                                     
|April 28,
 2008                      
|Hackensack,
 New Jersey              

---
Mountain Reservoirs

Land Management Plan

(Current Conditions)

Legend for Reservoir Maps

Prepared by:

Chickamauga-Hiwassee Watershed Team

May 2007

Plannable Lands

Zone 1 - Non-TVA Shoreland

Zone 2 - Project Operations

Zone 3 - Sensitive Resource Management

Zone 4 - Natural Resource Conservation

Zone 5 - Industrial

Zone 6 - Developed Recreation

Zone 7 - Shoreline Access

Former TVA Land

Subdivisions

Reservoir, River

Dam

Saddle Dam, Spillway

}" Stream Access Sites

Mountain Reservoirs Land Management Plan

Draft Environmental Impact Statement Allocations

Prepared by

Chickamauga-Hiwassee Watershed Team

July 2008

Prepared by

Chickamauga-Hiwassee Watershed Team

July 2008
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20609]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds Termination of 
Authority

AGENCY: Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury

ACTION: Surety Companies acceptable on federal bonds termination of 
authority:

American Employers' Insurance Company
CIGNA Insurance Company of Illinois
CIGNA Insurance Company of Texas
The Continental Insurance Company of Puerto Rico
The Employers' Fire Insurance Company
The Northern Assurance Company of America

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: (Dept. Circ. 570, 1997--Rev., supp. No. 12).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Surety Bond Branch (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the Certificates 
of Authority issued by the Treasury to the above listed companies, 
under the United States Code, Title 31, Sections 9304-9308, to qualify 
as acceptable sureties on Federal bonds were terminated effective June 
30, 1997.
    The Companies were last listed as acceptable sureties on Federal 
bonds at 61 FR 34280, June 30, 1996.
    With respect to any bonds currently in force with the above listed 
companies, bond-approving officers may let such bonds run to expiration 
and need not secure new bonds. However, no new bonds should be accepted 
from these Companies. In addition, bonds that are continuous in nature 
should not be renewed.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet 
(http:fms.treas.gov/c570.html) or through our computerized public 
bulletin board system (FMS Inside Line) at (202) 874-6887. A hard copy 
may be purchased from the Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, 
DC, telephone (202) 512-1800. When ordering the Circular from GPO, use 
the following stock number 048-000-00509-8.
    Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Funds 
Management Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 
6A14, Hyattsville, MD 20872.

    Dated: July 28, 1997.
Charles F. Schwan III,
Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Management Service.
[FR Doc. 97-20609 Filed 5-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
Exhibit 10.84a


                    MAXICARE HEALTH PLANS, INC.
                         SENIOR EXECUTIVES
                      1996 STOCK OPTION PLAN

                       AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE



      WHEREAS, Maxicare Health Plans, Inc. (the "Company") adopted,
and the Company's stockholders approved, the Maxicare Health Plans,
Inc. Senior Executives 1996  Stock  Option Plan (the "Plan"), which
Plan was effective on July 26th, 1996; and

      WHEREAS, pursuant to  Section  9  of  the  Plan, the Board of
Directors of the Company (the  "Board")  has the power to amend the
Plan; and

      WHEREAS, in order to reflect recently enacted changes to Rule
16b-3 promulgated under  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934, as
amended, as well as  finalized  regulations under Section 162(m) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,  as amended, the Board wishes to
amend the Plan in the manner set forth below; and

      WHEREAS, such amendments do  not  require the approval of the
Company's stockholders and will not adversely affect any Optionee's
rights  under  the  Plan  with  respect  to  any  Option heretofore
granted;

      NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended, effective as of the date
of adoption of this amendment, as follows:

      Section 8.5    is  amended  by  deleting  the fourth sentence
thereof.


      IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the   Company   has  caused  its  duly
authorized officer to execute  this  instrument of amendment on the
25th day of October, 1996.


                                     MAXICARE HEALTH PLANS, INC.


                                     By: /s/ Alan  D. Bloom
                                         ------------------


                                     ATTEST:


                                     By: /s/ Richard A. Link
                                         -------------------

                           190 of 193
<PAGE>
                          PROMISSORY NOTE



$50,000.00                                     Moonachie, New Jersey

     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the Undersigned promises to pay to the order
of Albert J. Wozniak, having a mailing address at 121 Moonachie
Avenue, Moonachie, New Jersey 07074 (hereinafter referred to as
the "Promisee"), the principal sum of FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS
($50,000.00) in lawful money of the United States.  This Note shall
bear interest on the unpaid principal sum, from April 30, 1997, at the
rate of EIGHT AND ONE HALF percent (8.5%) per annum.  Said principal
and interest shall be payable on demand by Promisee.  All computations
of interest shall be calculated on the basis of a 365 day year.

     1.  The Undersigned and each and every party to this Note,
whether as maker or otherwise, waives presentment, demand, protest
and notice of dishonor and of protest, and agrees to the terms hereof
and any extension or postponement of the time for payment.

     2.  The obligations evidenced by this Note shall bind the
Undersigned, their heirs and assigns, and the benefits hereto shall
inure to the holder hereof, their heirs and assigns.

     3.  The Promisee shall not by any act be deemed to have waived
any of its rights or remedies hereunder unless such waiver is in
writing and signed by the Promisee, and then only to the extent set
forth therein.  A waiver as to any one event shall in no way be
construed as continuing or as preventing waiver of such rights or
remedy on a subsequent event.

     4.  This Note may be prepaid in whole or in part, at any time,
without prepayment penalty or additional premium.

Dated: April 30, 1997

                                  STERITEK, INC.


                                  By: /s/ James K. Wozniak
                                  ------------------------
                                  James K. Wozniak,
                                  Vice President and CFO

142900
!( !(3 2

1314 QR

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000

Feet /

Apalachia Reservoir

Land Management Plan

Tile: B10

Jul 24, 2008

\\alismurphy\home\mprlm\projects\landplan\Maps\Apalachia_land_plan\Apalachia_land_plan_for_Web.mxd
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2402 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2402

To suspend temporarily the duty on sports footwear for men (other than 
ski-boots, cross-country ski footwear, snowboard boots and golf shoes), 
                              with spikes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mrs. Murray introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on sports footwear for men (other than 
ski-boots, cross-country ski footwear, snowboard boots and golf shoes), 
                              with spikes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPORTS FOOTWEAR FOR MEN (OTHER THAN SKI-BOOTS, CROSS-COUNTRY 
              SKI FOOTWEAR, SNOWBOARD BOOTS AND GOLF SHOES), WITH 
              SPIKES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Sports footwear     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        for men (other                                                     31/2015.......
                        than ski-boots,
                        cross-country ski
                        footwear,
                        snowboard boots
                        and golf shoes),
                        with spikes
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        6402.19.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Arthur CHEATHAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-713.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 24, 1977.

Rehearing Denied June 20, 1977.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Thomas G. Murray, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Ira N. Loewy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Arthur Cheatham, was informed against for aggravated battery, tried by jury, found guilty of aggravated assault and sentenced to five years in the state penitentiary.

Defendant first urges as reversible error the trial court’s denial of his motion for continuance of hearing on his sentencing in violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.720(b).

While it is undisputed that this rule requires a court, before sentencing, to afford a defendant the opportunity to present matters in mitigation of sentence,1 the court is not compelled under the rules to grant defendant a continuance prior to sentencing upon his motion therefor. The general rule is that the granting or denial of a motion for continuance is within the discretion of the trial court, and the court’s action with respect thereto will be reversed *1219only upon a showing of a palpable abuse of discretion. See *Douglas v. State,*216 So.2d 82 (Fla.3d DCA 1968); *Mills v. State,*280 So.2d 35 (Fla.3d DCA 1973). A review of the record reflects no such abuse of discretion. Defendant was given an opportunity to submit evidence in mitigation of sentence, and we find the trial court fully complied with the requirements of Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.720.

Defendant secondly contends that the court erred in reinstructing the jury, at its request, as to the elements of aggravated battery, aggravated assault and battery without also reinstructing the jury on reasonable doubt. We cannot agree.

It is proper for a trial judge to limit the repetition to the charges requested; however, the repeated charges should be complete on the subject involved. See *Hedges v. State,*172 So.2d 824 (Fla.1965). In the case sub judice the trial judge repeated the charges requested by the jury and these repeated charges were complete on the subject involved. The charges on reasonable doubt and acquittal were not essential to a complete and full instruction on the repeated charges. Cf. *Bristow*v. *State,*338 So.2d 553 (Fla.3d DCA 1976).

Judgment of conviction and sentence affirmed.

1

. *Mask v. State,*289 So.2d 385 (Fla.1973).