alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:

    /s/ Freddie M. KotekName:
    Freddie M. KotekTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
    May 17, 2010
UNITED
      STATES


SECURITIES
      AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington,
      D.C. 20549








FORM
      8-K





CURRENT
      REPORT





Pursuant
      to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934








Date
                of Report (date of earliest event reported):
            April
                12, 2006







TERABEAM,
                INC.(Exact
                name of registrant as specified in its
                charter)








Delaware
            000-29053
            04-2751645(State
                or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
            (Commission
                file number)
            (IRS
                employer identification no.)








2115
                O’Nel Drive, San Jose, CA
            95131(Address
                of principal executive offices)
            (Zip
                code)








Registrant’s
                telephone number, including area code:
            (408)
                731-2700







Not
                Applicable(Former
                name or former address, if changed since last
                report)







Check
      the
      appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
      satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
      provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):




o  Written
      communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
      230.425)




o  Soliciting
      material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
      240.14a-12)




o  Pre-commencement
      communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
      240.14d-2(b))




o  Pre-commencement
      communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
      240.13e-4(c))







Item
      2.02 Results
      of Operations and Financial Condition .





On
      April
      12, 2006, Terabeam, Inc. issued a press release providing updated guidance
      concerning its first quarter 2006 financial results. A copy of that press
      release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.








Item
      8.01 Other
      Events .





On
      April
      12, 2006, Terabeam, Inc. issued a press release announcing that the company
      had
      engaged Franklin Court Partners, LLC to explore a wide variety of possible
      strategic alternatives for its Ricochet® business. A copy of that press release
      is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.








Item
      9.01 Financial
      Statements and Exhibits .





(c)  Exhibits





See
      Exhibit Index.





SIGNATURE





Pursuant
      to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
      has
      duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
      duly authorized.




TERABEAM,
              INC.Dated:
                April 14, 2006
            By:
            /s/ David L. RenauldDavid
                L. RenauldVice
                President








EXHIBIT
      INDEX








Number
            Title99.1
            Press
                release dated April 12, 2006.







2
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2353 

To suspend temporarily the duty on benzylimidazole phenyl ethanol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on benzylimidazole phenyl 

ethanol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BENZYLIMIDAZOLE PHENYL ETHANOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Benzylimidazole phenyl ethanol (CAS No. 944268–66– 

0) (provided for in subheading 2933.29.35.00) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2353 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1999

<CASH>                                         34,910
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  721,829
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (17,179)
<INVENTORY>                                    803,021
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,582,854
<PP&E>                                         127,655
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (26,287)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,766,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,285,191
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,415
<OTHER-SE>                                     422,784
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,766,216
<SALES>                                        8,479,338
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,481,275
<CGS>                                          8,272,576
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,419,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               3,797
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             23,401
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                61,663
<INCOME-TAX>                                   24,946
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            36,717
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   36,717
<EPS-BASIC>                                    1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.07



</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

VIDEO INFORMATION

** Details

** Share

# Battle Creek Hosts ACOR23 

By Jason ShambergerDLA Disposition Services

                BATTLE CREEK, Mich.  –              
Watch as Logistics Operations exercise planner John Snead discusses the intent behind DLA's Agency Contingency Operations Readiness Exercise 23 -  which recently concluded at the Battle Creek Air National Guard Base. 

01:24VIDEO  | 01:24 |ACOR23 Takes Place in Battle Creek, Michigan

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLADLA DSExercisesTraining DSACOR 23
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 13-1170

___________________________

Wilma M. Pennington-Thurman lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. AT & T, Inc.; Southwestern Bell Te lephone Co.; Advanced Solutions, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________ Submitted: May 6, 2013 Filed: July 3, 2013 [Unpublished]

____________ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Wilma Pennington-Thurman appeals the district court’s 1 preservice dismissal of her civil complaint. After careful re view, we conclude that the dismissal was
1 The Honorable John A. Ross, United Stat es District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wedow v. City of Kansas City, Mo. , 442 F.3d 661, 669 (8th Cir. 2006) (res judicata applies when there is prior judgment rendered by court of competent juri sdiction, that prior judgment was final and on merits, and it involved same cause of action and same parties or privies; res judicata bars claims that were or could have been litigated in earlier proceeding); Black Clawson Co., Inc. v. Kroenert Corp. , 245 F.3d 759, 763 (8th Cir. 2001) (dismissal based on settlement agreement has effect of final judgment on merits). We do not address Pennington-Thurman's constitu tional challenge to the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act because it was not raised in her brief. SeeChay-Velasquez v. Ashcroft , 367 F.3d 751, 756 (8th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm. See8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# Adaptive acquisition: Unifying the interagency

By Anthony Rotolo Defense Acquisition University

                FORT BELVOIR, Va.  –              
The Defense Acquisition University speaks with two Defense Logistics Agency leaders about efforts to unify interagency agreements with the Department of Health and Human Services and Federal Emergency Management Agency.Listen below as DLA Acquisition Deputy Director Roxanne Banks and David Kless, DLA’s executive director of operations, talk about integrating procurement, industrial base expansion and best practices for succeeding in a joint environment.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

COVID-19PPEPersonal Protective Equipmentclothing and textilesMedicalDLA AcquisitionDLA Logistics OperationspodcastDefense Acquisition UniversityDAU
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Roger Dale DOUCET.

No. 59628.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 7, 1977.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writ of certiorari.

Not considered. Not timely filed.

TATE, J., concurs in denial. Unofficial postmark shows mailing date of March 31st, but application not received here until April 4th. Under such circumstances, unofficial postmark does not prove timely filing. See Rule 10, Section 5(b) (1976).
No. 55642.

#### Continental Distributing Company, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 162863-K/2820, etc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Before the Second Division,

May 19, 1943

No. 48293.

#### Protest 80928-K of American Merchandise Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In view of the uncontradicted evidence it was held that oilcans similar to those involved in Abstract 40863 are dutiable as hollow ware at 40 percent under paragraph 339, and bicycle horns similar to those the subject of *Spiegel*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 194, C. D. 692) were held dutiable as parts of bicycles at 30 percent under paragraph 371, as claimed.
No. 00-697.

#### Turner *v.*Warner Brothers Studio et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-797.

#### McKimm *v.*Ohio Elections Commission.

Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001

48–126 PDF 2009

[ERRATA] 

SUBCOMMITTEE ON RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 

ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND TRADE MARKUP ON 

ENTREPRENEURIAL DEVELOPMENT 

PROGRAMS LEGISLATION 

HEARING 

BEFORE THE

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS 

UNITED STATES 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION 

HEARING HELD 

APRIL 30, 2009 

Small Business Committee Document Number 111-118 

Available via the GPO Website: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/house 


Congress.#13
[ERRATA] 

THE REFERENCED HEARING HELD BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON

RURAL DEVELOPMENT, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND TRADE WAS INADVERTENTLY PRINTED WITH THE WRONG DOCUMENT NUMBER ON THE

TITLE PAGE. THE DOCUMENT NUMBER SHOULD BE ‘‘111-018’’ NOT

‘‘111-118’’.
#### International Products Corp. (William H. Masson, Inc.) *v.*United States

No. 5998.

Invoice dated Beverly Yks., England, December 6, 1937.

Certified December 10, 1937.

Entered at Baltimore, Md., January 17, 1938.

Entry No. 3456.

(Decided on rehearing (Reap. Dec. 5897) May 1, 1944)

*Tompkins & Tompkins (J. Stuart Tompkins*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Richard E. FiteOibbon,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Ekwall, Judge:

This case was originally decided by me and reported as Reap. Dec. 5897. Thereafter a motion for rehearing was made by the defendant, which was granted. The case was submitted before Presiding Judge Oliver at Baltimore. Subsequently counsel for both parties entered into a stipulation that the case might be reassigned to a judge other than the one before whom it was submitted on circuit, which stipulation, was approved by the presiding judge, and the case assigned to me.

In the original decision I found that the value of the merchandise, which consisted of powdered myrabolam extract 60 per centum shake, imported from England, was £20 6s. 3d. per km of 1,016 kilos f. o. b. Hull, packing included, less a discount of 3 per centum, which amount represented the foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The only question in dispute is the amount of the discount to be allowed. The record shows that the discounts allowed on the 19 uncontrolled sales in the latter part of 1937, the date of exportation' of this merchandise, ranged from 2 to 5 per cen-tum. I therefore find that the rate of discount to be allowed from the *per se*price is 2 per centum, and the original decision is modified to that extent.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### SWEENY v. MEANY.

April 6, 1836.

*Rule to show cause why a sheriff's sale,*&c. *should not be set aside.*

An *undivided portion*of land is not the subject of a summons in partition, to divide the same between its tenants in common.

THIS was an action of partition in which *Dennis Sweeny*was the plaintiff, and *Owen Meany*and others were the defendants. It was brought to have parted and divided between the parties, “ *a certain full, equal and undivided moiety or half part”*of certain real estate described in the writ; and the declaration followed the writ. The plaintiff obtained a judgment *quod partitio fiat*by default, for want of defendant’s appearance, and issued a *breve depart, fac.*on which the sheriff returned an inquisition, and that the property could not be divided without prejudice, &c. and affixing a valuation. The parties having all refused to take the premises at the valuation, a writ of sale was issued, and the sheriff sold the *undivided moiety*of the property described in the original writ and all the subsequent proceedings.

This was a rule to show cause why the sheriff’s sale and the proceedings in partition should not be set aside.

*Meredith,*for the rule.

*Dallas*and *Rawle, contra.*

Per Curiam.

The acts of assembly relating to partitions *(Purd. Dig., tit. Partition)*do not contemplate the issuing a writ to make partition between the tenants in common of an *undivided*portion of the land. This is obvious from the fact that the law bestows upon the inquest who are to act upon the *breve de partitione facienda,*the right and the duty to express an *opinion*as to whether the land held by the tenants in common is specifically the subject of division into parts, according to the judgment which has ascertained the rights of the parties, or that it cannot be divided without prejudice to or spoiling the whole. Act of the 11th of April 1799, sect. 2. There *168can be no such thing as an actual division of an umlivided portion : the object of setting out in ¡-eternity the pan or purpart of each tenant can not, in any case like this, he leached. For these reasons, these proceedings are irregular, and they must be set aside.

Rule absolute.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2340 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2340

    To suspend temporarily the duty on chime melody rod assemblies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 24 (legislative day, April 23), 2012

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on chime melody rod assemblies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHIME MELODY ROD ASSEMBLIES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Chime melody rod    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          assemblies                                                         31/2015.......
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          9114.90.50) for
                          the production of
                          grandfather
                          clocks, wall
                          clocks, and
                          mantel clocks....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```