alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# DLA Disposition Services observes National Native American Heritage Month

By Kelly BurellDLA Disposition Services

                BATTLE CREEK, Mich.   –              
November is National Native American Heritage Month and DLA Disposition Services Equal Employment Opportunity Office hosted a virtual program featuring keynote speaker Dr. Adam Haviland of Saginaw Chippawa Tribal College. Please join us by watching the virtual program which can be accessed below.

23:15VIDEO  | 23:15 |Native American Heritage Program

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

## Related Stories

DLA Disposition Services observes National Disability Employment Awareness Month

DLA Disposition ServicesDLA DS HQHeritage and Diversity DSNative American Program DSVideo DS
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Medical Nutrition USA, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1.          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
April 16, 2010By:
/s/ Francis A. NewmanFrancis A. NewmanChairman, Chief Executive OfficerDate:
April 16, 2010By:
/s/ Frank KimmerlingFrank KimmerlingVice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer
No. 99-7568.

#### Smith *v.*Nevada.

Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.
(Reap. Dec. 9129)

#### Fed. Tele. & Radio Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 832842, etc.

(Decided April 18, 1958)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached to and made part of the decision herein, present the question of the proper dutiable value of certain telephone equipment exported from Belgium.

By stipulation of the parties, it has been agreed that on or about the date of exportation such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale in Belgium either for consumption or for export to the United States, nor was such or similar merchandise freely offered for sale for domestic consumption in the United States, and that the cost of production of said merchandise, as such value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (f)), is the invoice unit values, less 1.82 per centum.

Upon the agreed facts of record, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in said section 402 (f), is the proper basis of value for the merchandise in issue and that said value is the invoice unit values, less 1.82 per centum.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 96-5828.

#### Lugo *v.*Rocha, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1 & 32.2

      STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004

In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Xenicent, Inc. (the
"Company")  for  the  quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Duane Bennett,
Chief  Executive  Officer,  certify  that:

*    the  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

*    information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Duane Bennett
-----------------
Duane Bennett
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
Acting Chief Financial Officer

June 9, 2004
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2407 

To suspend temporarily the duty on thermoplastic biodegradable polymer 

blend. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. LIEBERMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on thermoplastic 

biodegradable polymer blend. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. THERMOPLASTIC BIODEGRADABLE POLYMER 

4 BLEND. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2407 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Thermoplastic biodegradable 

polymer blend containing 

1,4-benzenedicarboxylic 

acid, dimethyl ester, polymer with 1,4-butanediol and 

hexanedioic acid (CAS No. 

55231–08–8 and/or 1,4- 

benzenedicarboxylic acid 

polymer with 1,4 butanediol 

and decanedioic acid (CAS 

No. 28205–74–5) and 1,4- 

dioxane-2,5-dione, 2,6-dimethyl-(3R, 6R)-polymer 

with rel-(3R, 6S)-3,6-dimethyl-1,4 dioxane-2,5-dione 

and (3S, 6S)-3,6-dimetyl1,4-dioxane-2,5-dione (CAS 

No. 9051–89–2) (provided 

for in subheading 

3913.90.50) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 99-7822 (99A577).

#### Jimenez *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Application for stay, addressed to Justice Souter and referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.
* * We will require the carrier to institute service in the Los Angeles

- Mexico City, Miami

- Mexico City, Los Angeles

- Guadalajara, and Miami

- Guadalajara market s no later than November 19,

2013

. We acted on this motion without awaiting the expiration of the answer period with the consent of all parties served with the request. Approved under assigned authority on August 20 , 201 3 **

Director, Office of International Aviation
#### UNION STONEWARE COMPANY v. JOHN LANG.1

March 6, 1908.

Nos. 15,392—(168)

Justice of the Peace — Jurisdiction.

It is a jurisdictional requirement that all actions at law commenced before a justice of the peace be brought in the township, village, or city, as required by subdivision 3, § 4960, G. S. 1894, as amended by chapter 321, Laws 1899.

Action before a justice of the peace, in which defendant Lang appeared specially and moved that the action be dismissed as to him on the ground that the justice had no jurisdiction. The motion was denied, judgment was entered and defendant appealed to the district court for Stearns county. The judgment was reversed, Taylor, J., and from the judgment of reversal plaintiff appealed.

Affirmed,

*Gilbert & Greenman,*for appellant.

*James R. Bennett, Jr.,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 115 N. W. 271.

LEWIS, J.

Chapter 321, p. ¿09, Laws 1899, amended the third subdivision of section 4960, G. S. 1894, to read as follows: “Nor for an action against an executor, or administrator, as such. Actions must in all cases be brought in the township, village or city where plaintiff or defendant, or one of several plaintiffs or defendants reside, or where any attorney at law, who has been duly admitted to practice in the courts of this state and who represents the plaintiff in the action, resides, or at the county seat. * * *”

*467In 1905 this action was commenced in the village of Paynesville,, Stearns county, before a justice 'of the peace, and both defendants, were properly served with the summons. Defendant Lang appeared specially and moved that the action be dismissed as to him on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction. In support of the motion; it was made to appear by affidavit that none of the parties required by the statute resided in the village of Paynesville. The motion was denied, judgment was entered for plaintiff, and defendant Lang appealed to the district court upon questions of law. The judgment of the justice was reversed by the district court, and the plaintiff appealed to this court.

The amendment was to those provisions of the statute having reference to the jurisdiction of justice courts. The legislature has the power to provide in what manner actions shall be begun, and the object of limiting the places for that purpose was to prevent parties; from being taken for trial to out-of-the-way and inconvenient localities. The requirements are not unreasonable, and the court has no> jurisdiction when the statute has not been complied with. In this, case it appears from the return from the justice court to the district court that defendant Lang appeared specially and moved to dismiss, the case for want of jurisdiction, and the affidavit presented in support of the motion was sufficient- to make out a prima facie case as to the facts.

Affirmed.
VI 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1188 

For the relief of Fereshteh Sani. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 7, 2005 

Mr. ALLEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Fereshteh Sani. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR 

4 FERESHTEH SANI. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Fereshteh Sani shall be eligible for issuance of an 

8 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 

9 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil10 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 

11 section 204 of that Act or for adjustment of status to law12 ful permanent resident. 
2 

•S 1188 IS

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Fereshteh Sani en2 ters the United States before the filing deadline specified 

3 in subsection (c), Fereshteh Sani shall be considered to 

4 have entered and remained lawfully and shall be eligible 

5 for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immi6 gration and Nationality Act as of the date of enactment 

7 of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Fereshteh Sani, the Secretary of State shall in16 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

17 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi18 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun19 try of birth of Fereshteh Sani under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

22 to natives of the country of birth of Fereshteh Sani under 

23 section 202(e) of that Act. 

Æ
Page 1 of 1
                          NEW ENGLAND BANCSHARES, INC.
                               855 Enfield Street
                                Enfield, CT 06082

For Immediate Release

CONTACT:  Scott D. Nogles, Chief Financial Officer
          (860) 253-5200

              New England Bancshares, Inc. Announces Completion of
                            Stock Repurchase Program

ENFIELD,  CT,  March 7, 2008 - New  England  Bancshares,  Inc.  (the  "Company")
(Nasdaq GM:  NEBS),  the holding  company for Enfield  Federal  Savings and Loan
Association  and Valley Bank,  announced the  completion  of a stock  repurchase
program that was authorized on October 9, 2007. The Company  repurchased 320,986
shares, or 5% of the Company's outstanding shares, at an average price of $11.70
per share.

Statements  contained in this news release,  which are not historical facts, are
forward-looking  statements  as that term is defined in the  Private  Securities
Litigation  reform Act of 1995. Such  forward-looking  statements are subject to
risks and  uncertainties,  which could cause actual results to differ materially
from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors,  which include, but
are not limited to, factors discussed in documents filed by the Company with the
Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time. Subject to applicable laws
and regulation,  the Company does not undertake - and specifically disclaims any
obligation - to publicly  release the results of any revisions which may be made
to any  forward-looking  statements to reflect events or circumstances after the
date  of  such  statements  or to  reflect  the  occurrence  of  anticipated  or
unanticipated events.

New England  Bancshares,  Inc. is  headquartered  in Enfield,  Connecticut,  and
operates Enfield Federal Savings and Loan Association with eight banking centers
servicing  the  communities  of Enfield,  Manchester,  Suffield,  East  Windsor,
Ellington  and Windsor Locks and Valley Bank with four banking  centers  serving
the communities of Bristol,  Terryville and  Southington.  For more  information
regarding    Enfield   Federal's    products   and   services,    please   visit
www.enfieldfederal.com and for more information regarding Valley Bank's products
and services, please visit www.valleybankct.com.

                                       ###
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 
 SECTION
        906 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350
  I,
        A.
        Bruce O’Connor, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the periodic
        report being filed herewith containing financial statements fully complies
        with
        the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
        of
        1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that information contained in said
        periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of Middlesex Water Company for the period
        covered by said periodic report.
  
 /s/
                  A. Bruce
                  O’ConnorA. Bruce O’ConnorChief
                  Financial Officer
 
 
 Date:   March
        10, 2008
 
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Middlesex Water Company and will be retained by Middlesex Water Company and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
No. 00-6649.

#### Russell *v.*Oklahoma.

Ct. Grim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
Corrected February 24, 2023

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 17-20545

Environment Texas Citizen Lobby, Incorporated; Sierra 

Club,

Plaintiffs—Appellees,

versus

ExxonMobil Corporation; ExxonMobil Chemical 

Company; ExxonMobil Refining & Supply Company,

Defendants—Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:10-CV-4969

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion July 29, 2020, 5 Cir., 2020, 968 F.3d 357)

(Opinion August 30, 2022, 5 Cir., 2022, 47 F.4th 408)

Before Richman, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Stewart, 

Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, 

Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson, and Douglas, 

Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 17, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk
No. 17-20545

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for 

rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judgesin regular active service 

and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en 

banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify 

a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to 5th

Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinions in this case dated July 29, 2020, and 

August 30, 2022, are VACATED.

2
Exhibit
      32.1





Certification
      Pursuant to


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


(as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906


of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
      connection with the quarterly report Royal Spring Water Inc. (the “Company”), on
      Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended February 28, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
      the undersigned of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
      to
      the best of their knowledge:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written certification has been provided to the Company and
      will
      be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
                Alex Hazan
              Name:
                Alex Hazan
              Title:
                Chief Executive Officer
              November 22,
                2006
              
              
              /s/
                Harel Goldstein
              Name:
                Harel Goldstein
              Title:
                Chief Financial Officer
              November 22,
                2006





This
      Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This exhibit is not “filed” for purposes of Section
      18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as provided
      by applicable rules of the Securities Exchange Commission.
No. 00-840.

#### Brown *v.*Utah.

Ct. App. Utah. Certiorari denied.
----

----

| 1.  | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.    | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the LP. |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 5, 2009                                                                    |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                           |   |   |
| /s/ Anthony J. Branca                                                                          |   |   |
| Anthony J. Branca                                                                              |   |   |
| Chief Financial OfficerICON Capital Corp.General Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight B L.P. |
#### Carson Pirie Scott & Co. *v.*United States

No. 6901.

Entry No. 5659/1, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, March 1, 1941, etc.

Certified March 31, 1941, etc.

Entered at Chicago, Ill., June 5, 1941, etc.

(Decided February 20, 1947)

*Wallace & Schwartz (Joseph Schwartz*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.