alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1164 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1164

 To amend the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 to provide for training 
               service and delivery innovation projects.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2005

 Ms. Cantwell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 to provide for training 
               service and delivery innovation projects.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRAINING SERVICE AND DELIVERY INNOVATION PROJECTS.

    Section 171(b)(1)(D) of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (29 
U.S.C. 2916(b)(1)(D)) is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(D) targeted innovation projects that improve 
                access to and delivery of employment and training 
                services, with emphasis given to projects that 
                incorporate advanced technologies to facilitate the 
                connection of individuals to the information and tools 
                they need to upgrade skills, including projects that 
                link individuals in need of training to opportunities 
                for self-guided learning, and with priority given to 
                projects that--
                            ``(i) actively promote sources of 
                        information about training opportunities and 
                        training content by providing technology 
                        directly to eligible training recipients;
                            ``(ii) provide for the conduct of online 
                        eligibility determinations for Federal and 
                        State training programs, and direct individuals 
                        to the appropriate programs in the area; and
                            ``(iii) integrate high-quality employment 
                        and training services information with the 
                        delivery of information regarding other social 
                        services and health care programs;''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

NOBEL LEARNING COMMUNITIES, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection with the Annual Report of Nobel Learning Communities, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George Bernstein, as Chief
Executive Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the dates and periods
covered by the Report.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 8, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/    George Bernstein
|                        |  |     |  | George Bernstein       
|                        |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lloyd L. GOINS, Jr.

No. 59914.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 1977.

In re: State of La. through the District Attorney, Harry F. Connick, Parish of Orleans, applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Writ denied: No abuse of discretion.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. The trial judge abused his discretion by ordering pre-trial production of an F.B.I. “rap sheet” contrary to decisions of this Court.
ULYSSES BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

WALTER A. MCNEIL, 

SECRETARY, FLORIDA 

DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Appellee.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 1D08-3141

Opinion filed August 10, 2017.

Ulysses Brown, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General and Kenneth Steely, General Counsel, Florida 

Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This Court previously barred Appellant from pro se filings in this Court 

concerning convictions and sentences in Duval County Circuit Court case nos. 1982 

CF 06820 and 1982 CF 06845. We instructed the Clerk of Court “to reject any future 

pleadings, petitions, motions, documents, or other filings submitted by Ulysses Brown, 
2

DC# 089244” related to his convictions and sentences unless the filing was signed by a 

member in good standing of the Florida Bar. Brown v. McNeil, 22 So. 3d 741, 743

(Fla. 1st DCA 2009). Since this prohibition, the Clerk of Court has received five pro se 

pleadings from Appellant. As instructed, the Clerk rejected the filings and each time 

wrote Appellant informing him that no action will be taken.

Our prior opinion warned Appellant that any violation of the prior bar order may 

subject him to further appropriate sanctions as provided in section 944.279(1), Florida 

Statutes. Id. Because Appellant continues to abuse the legal process by submitting pro 

se filingsin clear violation of this court’s order, a certified copy of this opinion shall be 

provided to the Florida Department of Corrections to be forwarded to the appropriate 

institution or facility for disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the department 

as provided in section 944.279, Florida Statutes. 

Disciplinary action imposed.

ROBERTS, ROWE, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 147 (Thursday, July 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20120]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3663-000]


Union Electric Development Corporation; Notice of Filing

July 25, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 8, 1997, Union Electric Development 
Corporation (UEDC) filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
an application for authority to charge market based rates and for 
certain waivers and authorizations. UEDC requested waiver of notice to 
permit its proposed rate schedule to become effective on July 9, 1997, 
one day after the date of filing.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protect said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before August 6, 1997. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20120 Filed 7-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2013156EN.01002101.xml

| 1.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/21

---

Action brought on 14 March 2013 — European Parliament v Council of the European Union

(Case C-124/13)

2013/C 156/32

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Parliament (represented by: L.G. Knudsen, I. Liukkonen and R. Kaškina, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Council Regulation (EU) No 1243/2012 of 19 December 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 establishing a long-term plan for cod stocks and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (1); and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Regulation (EU) No 1243/2012 of 19 December 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 establishing a long-term plan for cod stocks and the fisheries exploiting those stocks (1); and

1

| — | order Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The European Parliament raises a single plea of annulment of the contested Regulation on the grounds that Article 43(3) TFEU is not the appropriate legal basis for the contested Regulation and that it should have been adopted on the basis of Article 43(2) TFEU, as the latter provision gives the European Union legislature the necessary powers for adopting an act with the aim and content of the contested Regulation. The legal basis used excluded Parliament from taking part in the adoption of the act, whereas Article 43(2) TFEU provides for the ordinary legislative procedure to be followed. The erroneous legal basis must lead to the annulment of the contested Regulation.

Under the first limb of its plea Parliament asserts that each multiannual plan, such as that at stake in the present case, as a fish stocks conservation and management tool, forms a whole which only contains provisions in the pursuit of the sustainability and conservation objectives of the CFP and must therefore be adopted in its entirety under Article 43(2) TFEU.

The second limb of Parliament's plea consists of the assertion that the adoption of the contested Regulation separately from the remainder of the Commission proposal constitutes in any event an abuse of the procedure and empties the established case-law on the choice of legal basis according to the centre of gravity of the act, of its contents. Splitting the proposal enabled the Council to artificially choose a separate legal basis for certain elements of the proposed act, whereas these would have been absorbed by the single legal basis of Article 43(2) TFEU had the act been adopted in the form of the initially proposed whole.

---

(1)  OJ L 352, p. 10

1

---
No. 96-8021.

#### Garza-Nevarez *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 48928.

#### Protest 533241-G of A. S. Stark & Bro., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items consist of harvest hats similar to those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). The protest was therefore sustained as to these items.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1219 Referred in House (RFH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1219

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2006

                 Referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To authorize certain tribes in the State of Montana to enter into a 
 lease or other temporary conveyance of water rights to meet the water 
         needs of the Dry Prairie Rural Water Association, Inc.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE OF WATER RIGHTS TO DRY PRAIRIE RURAL 
              WATER ASSOCIATION, INC.

    (a) In General.--The Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck 
Indian Reservation, Montana (referred to in this section as the 
``Tribes'') may, with the approval of the Secretary, enter into a lease 
or other temporary conveyance of water rights recognized under the Fort 
Peck-Montana Compact (Montana Code Annotated 85-20-201) with the Dry 
Prairie Rural Water Association, Incorporated (or any successor non-
Federal entity) for the purpose of meeting the water needs of that 
association, in accordance with section 5 of the Fort Peck Reservation 
Rural Water System Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-382; 114 Stat. 1454).
    (b) Conditions of Lease.--With respect to a lease or other 
temporary conveyance described in subsection (a)--
            (1) the term of the lease or conveyance shall not exceed 
        100 years; and
            (2)(A) the lease or conveyance may be approved by the 
        Secretary without monetary compensation to the Tribes; and
            (B) the Secretary shall not be subject to liability for any 
        claim relating to any compensation or consideration received by 
        the Tribes under the lease or conveyance.
    (C) No Permanent Alienation of Water.--Nothing in this section 
authorizes a permanent alienation of any water by the Tribes.

            Passed the Senate February 1, 2006.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2386 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Penflufen. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. ROCKEFELLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Penflufen. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PENFLUFEN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 N-[2-(1,3- 

dimethylbutyl)phenyl]-5- 

fluoro-1,3-dimethyl-1Hpyrazole-4-carboxamide 

(Penflufen) (CAS No. 

494793–67–8) (as provided for in subheading 

3808.93.15) ....................... 5.0% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2386 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 4239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2107]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 678

[I.D. 092396B]


Atlantic Shark Fisheries; Extension of Comment Period

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS extends the comment period for a proposed rule to adjust 
quotas and bag limits in the Atlantic Shark Fishery that was published 
in the Federal Register on December 20, 1996. The proposed rule would 
establish quotas and bag limits and implement prohibitions and 
requirements to reduce effective fishing mortality, facilitate 
enforcement, and improve management.

DATES: Written comments on the proposed rule must be received on or 
before February 7, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to William T. Hogarth, 
Chief, Highly Migratory Species Management Division (F/SF1), Office of 
Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East-
West Highway, Room 14853, Silver Spring, MD 20910.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: C. Michael Bailey or John Kelly, 301-
713-2347; fax 301-713-1917.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Although NMFS previously extended the 
comment period from January 21, 1997, to January 24, 1997 (62 FR 1872, 
January 14, 1997), NMFS has received requests from the affected public 
that more time is necessary to submit their comments on the Atlantic 
shark fishery proposed rule (61 FR 67295, December 20, 1996). The 
proposed rule, as published, would reduce commercial quotas and 
recreational bag limits; establish a quota for small coastal sharks; 
prohibit the directed commercial fishing for, and landing or sale of, 
five species of sharks; establish a recreational tag-and-release only 
fishery for white sharks; prohibit filleting of sharks at sea; and 
restate the requirement for species-specific identification by all 
owners or operators, dealers, and tournament operators of all sharks 
landed.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: 23 January 1997.
George H. Darcy,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-2107 Filed 1-24-97; 10:00 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**
**FAA -**  **20 12**  **- 4278**  Docket Number
**20 12**  **- SW**  **- 022**  **- AD**  Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the

Supplemental AD Docket – NPRM Agusta Bollettino Tecnico No 139 - 269, dated September 30, 2011 .


### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 10101 Hillwood Pkwy, Room 6N - 321 Fort W orth, Texas 761 7 7 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
II 

Calendar No. 577 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2326 

To designate the new United States courthouse in Buffalo, New York, as 

the ‘‘Robert H. Jackson United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mrs. GILLIBRAND) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 

and Public Works 

DECEMBER 27, 2012 

Reported by Mrs. BOXER, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the new United States courthouse in Buffalo, 

New York, as the ‘‘Robert H. Jackson United States 

Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse at 2 Niagara Square, 

5 Buffalo, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Robert H. Jackson United States Courthouse’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•S 2326 RS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert H. Jackson United States 

6 Courthouse’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with 

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with 
Calendar No. 577 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2326 

A BILL 

To designate the new United States courthouse in 

United States Courthouse’’. Buffalo, New York, as the ‘‘Robert H. Jackson 

DECEMBER 27, 2012 

Reported without amendment 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with
```

[111th Congress Public Law 123]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 123 STAT. 3483]]

Public Law 111-123
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To permit continued financing of Government operations. <<NOTE: Dec. 28, 
                         2009 -  [H.R. 4314]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CONTINUED FINANCING OF GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS.

    Subsection (b) of section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, is 
amended by striking the dollar amount contained therein and inserting 
``$12,394,000,000,000''.

    Approved December 28, 2009.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4314:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009):
            Dec. 16, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 24, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1
                                                    Press Release dated 11-30-06

News Release
For Immediate Release

    First Litchfield Financial Corporation Declares Stock and Cash Dividends

Litchfield,   Connecticut,   November  30,  2006--First   Litchfield   Financial
Corporation,  (NASDQ:FLFL)  (the  "Company"),  the holding company for The First
National Bank of Litchfield  (the "Bank"),  today  declared a 5% stock  dividend
payable  December 29, 2006 to  shareholders of record on December 15, 2006. This
will mark the 29th consecutive year the Company has issued a 5% stock dividend.

In addition,  the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.15
per share  payable on January 26, 2007 to  shareholders  of record on January 5,
2007.

                              Safe-Harbor Statement

Statements  contained in this news release  contain  forward-looking  statements
within the  meaning of the  Private  Securities  Litigation  Reform Act of 1995.
These statements are based on the beliefs and expectations of management as well
as the  assumption  made using  information  currently  available to management.
Since these statements reflect the views of management concerning future events,
these statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions,  including, among
others:  changes in market  interest  rates and  general and  regional  economic
conditions; changes in government regulations; changes in accounting principles;
and the quality or composition  of the loan and investment  portfolios and other
factors that may be described in the  Company's  quarterly  reports on Form 10-Q
and its annual report on Form 10-K,  each filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission,  which are  available at the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission's
internet website (www.sec.gov) and to which reference is hereby made. Therefore,
actual future  results may differ  significantly  from results  discussed in the
forward-looking statements.

                                   About FNBL

One of the oldest nationally  chartered banks in the country, The First National
Bank of Litchfield  (www.fnbl.com)  has served the  communities of  northwestern
                     ------------
Connecticut since 1814. It has full- service banking offices in Canton,  Goshen,
Litchfield,  Marble Dale, New Milford, Roxbury,  Washington and Torrington, with
total assets of over $500 million.  The Bank provides  consumer,  commercial and
retail  investment  and insurance  products and  services,  as well as equipment
leasing through its new subsidiary,  First Litchfield Leasing  Corporation.  Its
Trust and Wealth  Management group offers asset management and estate settlement
services to individuals, non-profit and commercial customers.

Contact:  Carroll A. Pereira
          (860) 567-2674

                                       ###