alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2229 

To authorize the issuance of right-of-way permits for natural gas pipelines 

in Glacier National Park, and for other purpose. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22, 2012 

Mr. TESTER (for himself and Mr. BAUCUS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the issuance of right-of-way permits for natural 

gas pipelines in Glacier National Park, and for other 

purpose. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMITS FOR EXISTING NATURAL GAS PIPE4 LINES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior may 

6 issue right-of-way permits for each natural gas pipeline 

7 (including all appurtenances used in the operation of the 

8 natural gas pipeline) that, as of March 1, 2012, is located 

9 within the boundary of Glacier National Park. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2229 IS

1 (b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—A permit issued 

2 under subsection (a) shall be— 

3 (1) issued as a right-of-way renewal, consistent 

4 with laws (including regulations) generally applicable 

5 to utility rights-of-way within units of the National 

6 Park System, including the Act of March 4, 1911 

7 (16 U.S.C. 5); 

8 (2) for a width of not more than 50 feet on ei9 ther side of the centerline of the natural gas pipe10 line; and 

11 (3) subject to any terms and conditions that the 

12 Secretary of the Interior determines to be necessary. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
----

Form 10-KSB Exhibit 32.2**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350
(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) 

I, Mingda Rong, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, asadopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based upona review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31,2007 of the Registrant (the "Report"): 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Registrant. 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by theRegistrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request. 
**SIGNATUREDate: April 15, 2008/s/Mingda Rong                                Mingda Rong   Chief Financial Officer
 ******
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Planar Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 26, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven J. Buhaly, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|By: |  | /s/    Steven J. Buhaly                   
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------
|    |  | Steven J. Buhaly                          
|    |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



December 22, 2003
No. 47709.

#### Protests 28797-K, etc., of Gellman Bros. (Minneapolis).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel entered into at the trial, items described as rubber balloon squawkers with feathers fastened to one end of a hollow stick or cane and rubber balloon squawkers are similar to those the subject of Abstract 40493. The claim at 45 percent under paragraph 409 was therefore sustained.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China
      Natural Gas ,
      Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ending March 31, 2008as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Lihong
      Guo ,
      Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
            The
                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Dated:
                May 19, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Lihong GuoChief
                Financial Officer
F-i

APPENDIX F. ASPECT RATIO CALCULATIONS FOR BUILDINGS WITH COURTYARDS TABLE OF CONTENTS F.1 COURTYARD

ASPECT RATIO DETERMINATION
....................... F-1 F.2 MAPPING TO A RECTANGULAR BUILDING WITH OUT A COURTYARD
.... F-1F-1

APPENDIX F. ASPECT RATIO CALCULATIONS FOR BUILDINGS WITH COURTYARDS F.1 COU RTYARD

ASPEC T RATI O DETE RMINATI ON A si ngle-stor y rectan

gula r buildi ng wi th a court ya

rd with the distance f

rom the outside wall to t he co ur t yard of a co nst ant dep t h D, widt h W and Asp ect Rat io R ha s t he fo llowing f ormu l as f or Are a an

d Peri meter: Perim

eter = out si de perim

eter + court ya

rd perim eter = 2 W (R+1) + 2 (RW -2D + W-2D) = 4RW +4W

–8D = 4 (RW +W

-2D) Area = 2 (D) (W-2D) + 2 (D) (RW-2D) + 4 D 2

= 2 D (RW +W

–2D) And t he r at io o f t he pe r imet er t o ar ea ( P/ A) be co mes simp ly P/A = 2/ D This i s im por tant. The ratio o f the Perim eter t o Foo tpr in

t area for these buil

din gs is a co nst ant onc e t he de pt h D is kno wn.
F.2 MAPPING TO A RECTANGULAR BUILDING WIT HOUT A COURTYARD If we wan t t o pro duce a rectangular bui ldi ng wi th the sam

e ratio of peri

me ter t o area, we start with the ratio of peri me ter P’ to area A’ i

n an y rectan gula r buildi ng of wi dth W’ an d aspect ratio R’ P’ = 2( W+RW’)

=2W’(R’ +1) A’ = (R’W’ )( W’) P/ A = 2 ( R’+1 ) / R’ W’ Equating P’/A ’ wi

th P/A we get 2 (R’+ 1) /(R’W ’) = 2 / DF-2

We do not kno w R’ o r W’ c ur re nt ly, but we d o k now t hat we w ant t he floo r a re a o f the bui l di ng w i th the courty ard to be the s am e as that of our rectan

gul ar (n on courty ard) b uil di ng. Hence, W’ = ( A/R’) 0.5 , a nd su bst itu t ing 2 (R’ +1) /(A

0.5 R’ 0.5 ) = 2 /D (R’+1) / R’ 0.5 = (A 0.5 /D) R’ 2 +2R’ +1 = A

R’/D 2 R’ 2 +(2-A/D 2 )R’ +1 = 0 And so lving the qua dr at ic in R R’ = -(2-A/D 2 ) +/- [(2-A/D 2 ) 2 –4] 0.5

2 R’ = -(2-A/D 2 ) +/- [(4-4A/ D 2 +A 2 /D 4 –4] 0.5 2
R’ = A/D 2 -2 +/- [(

A2 /D 4 -4A/D 2 ] 0.5 2 The two solutions correspond to R = L/W and R = W/L. W

e want the l arger, greater t han 1.0 val ue f or R’. If we f urther sub stitute param

eter Z f or A/D 2 R’ = A/D 2 + [(A 2 /D 4 -4A/D 2 ] 0.5 -2 2 R’= Z

+ [(Z 2 –4Z] 0.5 -2 2

at the lower li

mi t (a square bui ldi

ng wi th in fi ni tesim al court ya rd) A = 4D 2 and Z = 4 and R = R’ = 1, wh i ch i s wh at y ou would ex

pect (s tart wi

th a s quare , end wi

th a s quare

bui l di ng)
. At the upper li

mi t, Z goes t o inf

in ity and R’ ~ Z, whi

ch i s al so what you would ex pect from a thin rib bon of b uil din g with c ourt ya

rd.
<PAGE>







                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #9 Ltd. (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nancy
J. McGurk, Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General Partner, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.




/s/ Nancy J. McGurk






Nancy J. McGurk
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
#### STATE of Louisiana v. J. P. McELROY, Jr.

No. 59360.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 1, 1977.

Truett West, Farmerville, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ragan D. Madden, Dist. Atty., E. J. Bleich, J. T. Spencer, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The issue of whether or not the defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel is properly raised by writ of habeas *1160corpus. *State v. Ross,*343 So.2d 722 (La.1977); *State v. Mouton,*327 So.2d 413 (La.1976).

Finding no reversible error in the record presently before us, defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.
No. 55651.

#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 163904-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
No. 00-6302.

#### Morales-Ramirez *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Scaled RRF - SJV 4k DomainMaderaNH4 NO3 SO4 OC EC OTRQ1 0.80 0.74 1.01 0.72 0.88 0.99Q2 0.74 0.63 1.01 0.83 0.89 0.99Q3 0.71 0.62 1.00 0.89 0.90 0.99Q4 0.79 0.74 1.01 0.74 0.88 0.99Annual2011-2013 STN with SandwichNH4 NO3 SO4 OCMmb EC Crustal Water BlankFilter Mass 2011 2012 2013 2011-13Q1 1.16 3.41 0.81 9.85 1.05 0.54 0.68 0.50 18.00 21.2 21 16.2 18.60Q2 0.15 0.00 1.06 3.70 0.29 0.89 0.38 0.50 6.96 14.1 14 13.1 13.55Q3 0.21 0.00 1.24 5.48 0.49 1.29 0.44 0.50 9.65 17.9 15.7 14.4 15.05Q4 1.82 5.21 1.04 13.53 1.45 1.05 1.02 0.50 25.62 28.5 13.2 27.4 20.30Annual 0.83 2.16 1.03 8.14 0.82 0.94 0.63 0.50 15.06 20.43 15.98 17.78 18.062018-2020 Controlled PM2.5NH4 NO3 SO4 OCMmb EC Crustal Water BlankFilter Mass 2018 2019 2020 2018-20Q1 0.93 2.52 0.81 7.08 0.92 0.54 0.52 0.50 13.82 16.25 16.10 12.45 14.27Q2 0.11 0.00 1.06 3.08 0.26 0.88 0.38 0.50 6.28 12.67 12.58 11.77 12.18Q3 0.15 0.00 1.24 4.86 0.44 1.28 0.44 0.50 8.91 16.50 14.47 13.28 13.88Q4 1.43 3.84 1.05 9.97 1.28 1.04 0.77 0.50 19.88 22.10 10.30 21.25 15.77Annual 0.65 1.59 1.04 6.25 0.73 0.93 0.53 0.50 12.22 16.88 13.36 14.69 14.98Design ValueFuture Design Value
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00268-CV

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

v.

JOHN EUGENE ORTIZ

On Appeal from the

107th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-DCL-07207-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered. The 

Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment in 

accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 21, 2022
2094_Sibley_U123_OETM Part III notes.txt

This file contains additional information for the 

2094_Sibley_U123_Other_Emission_Test_Methods_Part_III.xls

CO Emission Data: Worksheet deleted.

Formaldehyde Emission Data: Worksheet deleted.

CH4 Emission Data: Worksheet deleted.

SO2 Emission Data: Method 6C entered in ERT. Worksheet deleted.

Hg Emission Data 30B: The measured value and the emission rate value in lb/mmBtu are an average of both 

tubes (A&B). The units 1, 2 and 3 boilers are fueled by 85% subbituminous coal & 15% bituminous. The 

coal feed rate is the combined coal feedrate for units 1, 2, and 3 with 85% in fuel #1 and 15% in fuel 

#2. This value was converted to pounds per hour. The combined average hourly value for the day was 

entered with a note in the 'Other Supporting Information' column.

Speciated Volatile Organic HAP: Worksheet deleted.

Speciated Semi-Volatile Organic HAP: Worksheet deleted.

HCN Emission Data: Worksheet deleted.

HCl Emission Data: Worksheet deleted.

HF Emission Data: Worksheet deleted.

NOx Emission Data: Worksheet deleted.

Page 1
90 Arrival Ave, Suite 20-LI MacArt hur Airport- Ronkonkoma, NY 11779

631-737-4430 – 800-516- 4430 Fax 631-737-2093

www.naac.com October 10, 2011

North American Air Charter petition for an exemption from Special Federal Aviation Regulation No.77 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations Addendum and Supplement to document FAA-2011-1081

Dear Sirs:

On October 3, 2011 the undersigned, on behalf of North American Air Charter, Inc. (“North American”) filed a petition for exem ption from SFAR 77. This document is an addendum and supplement to that petition.

In support of this request Nort h American states as follows:

North American proposes to conduct operations between points outside of Iraq and Erbil, Iraq generally through the Erbil airport. (ORER is ICAO designator for Erbil). (Please note that the original petition contained a t ypographical error in th e ICAO designator for Erbil, Iraq)

Routing into and out of Iraq will be through Turkey (LTAA FIR) as follows:

 On the routing into Erbil the flight will enter the Iraq ORBB FIR at position "NINVA" on the UM688 airway to positi on "ROXOP". From ROXOP the flight will follow the "GAZNA 2B" Rwy 18) or "LAVEN 1A" (Ryw 36) STAR into

ORER.

 On the routing from Erbil, the flight w ill depart on the either the "SEVKU 1A" (Ryw 18) or "EMIDO 1A" (Rwy36) SID to join airway UM860 to the FIR exit point at position "KABAN"

North American has contracted to use the serv ices of an experienced Iraq flight handler--

Palm Aviation. Palm Aviation is Dubai based firm and, importantly, has an office located in Erbil, Iraq and is therefore very experi enced and knowledgeable of local conditions in Erbil and regional flight operational issues.

Palm Avaition Dubai International Airport Free Zone

293711 - Dubai - UAE

G-23 - Dubai - UAE

+ 971 4 299 3100 www.palmaviation.aero2 Palm Aviation will be the primary supplie r to North American of all necessary aeronautical weather and airport assessment information as well as NOTAMS. Threat

assessments will be communicated to North Am erican and its flight crews through Palm

Aviation’s Erbil office. North American will inquire about all possible threat assessments prior to each operation into and out of Iraq. To supplement the Palm Aviation supplied information North American will also query its other international handler, Universal Weather and Aviation, which will provide threat assessment information and other intelligence for the Iraq area as we ll as airport assessments.

When visiting Erbil the North American cr ews and passengers will be staying in the Prime Minister’s compound, who has offered the use of several guest cottages. As guests of the Prime Minister, the crew and the passengers will be accorded the highest possible level of security. Security for the aircraft while at Erbil will be provided by Palm Aviation, as will all local transportation for the crews and passengers.

If you have any questions regarding any aspect of this request fo r approval to conduct Part 135 flight operations to and from th e territory of Iraq, please contact the undersigned.

Very truly yours,

Jonathan D. Ross Director of Operations (800) 516-4430 jonr@naac.com
Exhibit 32
                                                                      ----------


                                  Certification
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
             Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
            Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)


      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Investors Title Company, a North Carolina
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

      The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
"Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:   March 30, 2004               /s/ J. Allen Fine
                                      -----------------
                                      J. Allen Fine
                                      Chief Executive Officer


Dated:   March 30, 2004               /s/ James A. Fine, Jr.
                                      ----------------------
                                      James A. Fine, Jr.
                                      Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.b CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Theodore Misiewicz, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, of Morgan Beaumont, Inc. (the Company); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules13a-15 and 15d-15) for the Company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the Evaluation Date); and (c) Presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. The Companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and        (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls; and 6. The Companys other certifying officers and I have indicated in this report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: May 22, 2006
        /s/ Theodore Misiewicz
Theodore Misiewicz, Chief Financial Officer and Director * Provide a separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Company. See Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a).
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 71028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28854]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Twelfth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 223, Airport Surface 
Wireless Communications

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT)

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 223, Airport Surface 
Wireless Communications.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 223, Airport Surface Wireless 
Communications.

DATES: The meeting will be held December 4-6, 2012, from 9:00 a.m.-5:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Boeing, Building 2-25 Lobby, 
7755 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, WA 98108.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC, 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-
0662/(202) 833-9339, fax (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 223. The agenda will 
include the following:

Tuesday, December 4th--Thursday, December 6th, 2012

 Plenary
 Welcome, Introductions, Administrative Remarks by Special 
Committee Leadership
 Agenda Overview
 Review/Approve prior Plenary Meeting Summary and Action Item 
Status
 General Presentations of Interest
     ICAO WG-S Status
     EUROCAE WG-82 Status
 Detailed MOPS Review
 Establish Agenda, Date and Place for Next Plenary Meetings
 Review of Meeting Summary Report
 Adjourn-Plenary Meeting
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 8, 2012.
Richard F. Gonzalez,
Management Analyst, Business Operations Group, Federal Aviation 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-28854 Filed 11-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 28, 2021

No. 04

- 20

- 00399

- CV

CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION,

Appellant

v.

Sydney BERRA, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lee Berra, and on

behalf of his surviving pare nts, Philip Berra and Ellen Berra,

Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI01530

The Honorable Monique Diaz , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justic e

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file its reply brief is GRANTED.

Appellant’s reply brief is due on or before February 17, 2021

.

I t is so ORDERED on this 28th day of January, 2021

.

PER CURAIM

ATTESTED TO :

______________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court