alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BEFORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, DC
Application of VIRGIN AMERICA INC. for a statement ofauthorization under 14 C.P.R. Part 212 

### ) ) 

### ) ) Docket No. DOT-OST- 2012-0095 ) 

### ) )



# ____________________________)

NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL CODE-SHARING

Communications with respect to this document shouldbe sent to:

John Varley Senior Vice President &

General Counsel Virgin America Inc. 555 Airport Boulevard, Suite 500 Burlingame, CA 94010 (650) 762-7108 (650) 762-7001 (fax) john.varley@virginamerica.com

March 28, 2013 Malcolm L. Benge Jonathon H. Foglia Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger L.L.P. 888 Seventeenth Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20006 Tel: (202) 298-8660 Fax: (202) 342-0683 mlbenge@zsrlaw.com jhfoglia@zsrlaw.com Counsel for Virgin America Inc.BEFORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, DC
Application of VIRGIN AMERICA INC. for a statement ofauthorization under 14 C.F.R. Part 212 ) 

### ) ) ) Docket No. DOT-OST- 2012-0095 

### ) ) )



# ____________________________)
NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL CODE-SHARING

Pursuant to the blanket statement ofauthorization granted in the above-captioned docket, Virgin America Inc. ("Virgin America") hereby notifies the Department that, on or after 30 days from today, Virgin Americaplans to display the "VA" designator code ofVirgin Australia International Airlines Pty Ltd. ("Virgin Australia") on flights operated byVirgin America between Los Angeles, California ("LAX") and Newark, New Jersey ("EWR"), in conjunction with Virgin Australia's scheduled Australia-U.S. services in foreign air transportation (either non-stop or via third-country intermediate points).

March 28, 2013 Respectfully submitted,

# ~'&n~,~ Jonathon H. Foglia Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger L.L.P. 888 Seventeenth Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20006 Tel: (202) 298-8660 Fax: (202) 342-0683 mlbenge@zsrlaw.com jhfoglia@zsrlaw.com Counsel for Virgin America Inc.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy ofthe foregoing Notice was served this 28th day ofMarch, 2013, via email transmission on the following persons: francis.heil@aa.com robert.wirick@aa.com jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com (Counsel for Amerijet International) lachter@starpower.net (Counsel for ASTAR Air Cargo) rpommer@atlasair.com sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com sametta.c.bamett@delta.com tom.lydon@evergreenaviation.com charters@evergreenairlines.com anbird@fedex.com gbleopard@fedex.com jhill@dowlohnes.com (Counsel for Hawaiian Airlines) matwood@cozen.com (Counsel for Kalitta Air) kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com peter.beckett@polaraircargo.com jonathan.linde@united.com dan.weiss@united.com gmurphy@crowell.com (Counsel for United Airlines) lhalloway@crowell.com (Counsel for United Airlines) anita.mosner@hklaw.com (Counsel for United Parcel Service) jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com (Counsel for United Parcel Service) howard.kass@usairways.com benjamin.slocum@usairways.com mlbenge@zsrlaw.com (Counsel for World Airways) urskr@state.gov susan.kurland@dot.gov esta.rosenberg@dot.gov todd.homan@dot.gov peter.irvine@dot.gov john.allen@faa.gov

Jonathon H. Foglia
#### Lindell TINEY v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 49713.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 6, 1977.

John C. Webb, Greenville, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Pete J. Cajoleas, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Washington County; B. B. Wilkes Judge.

Before PATTERSON, P. J., and ROBERTSON and BROOM, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

GILLESPIE, C. J., INZER, P. J., and SMITH, SUGG, WALKER and LEE, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. John O’NEILL, David Grossfeld, Michael Tidmarsh, Gregory Orr, John Henry Berman, Steve Martin and Richard Badolato.

No. 60170.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 7, 1977.

In re: John O’Neill et al., applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Writ denied. Trial judge has scheduled completion of bail reduction hearing and preliminary examination on July. 8, 1977. In the event of an adverse ruling, relators have an adequate remedy by a further application to this court.

SUMMERS, J., would deny the writ without comment.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JOHN HUTCHINSON,

Petitioner

v.

ANNVILLE TOWNSHIP (WORKERS' 

COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD),

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 489 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

JOHN HUTCHINSON,

Petitioner

v.

ANNVILLE TOWNSHIP (WORKERS' 

COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD),

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 490 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### Joseph Horne Co. *v.*United States

No. 6965.

Entry No. 70.

Invoice dated London, England, June 19, 1946.

Certified June 19, 1946.

Entered at Pittsburgh, Pa., July 23, 1946.

(Decided March 5, 1947)

*Jerome O. Clifford*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. McArthur GALLOW v. Ross MAGGIO, Warden.

No. 60515.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 27, 1977.

In re: McArthur Gallow applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ denied.

DENNIS, J.,

dissents for the reasons voted on relator’s appeal, *State v. Gallow,*338 So.2d 920 (La.1976).
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1222 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reinstate the Oil Spill 

Liability Trust Fund tax and to maintain a balance of $3 billion in 

the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 9, 2005 

Mr. STEVENS (for himself, Mr. INOUYE, and Ms. CANTWELL) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reinstate 

the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund tax and to maintain 

a balance of $3 billion in the Oil Spill Liability Trust 

Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Oil Spill Liability 

5 Trust Fund Maintenance Act’’. 
2 

•S 1222 IS 

1 SEC. 2. OIL SPILL LIABILITY TRUST FUND FINANCING 

2 RATE. 

3 Section 4611(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

4 1986 (relating to application of oil spill liability trust fund 

5 financing rate) is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(f) APPLICATION OF OIL SPILL LIABILITY TRUST

7 FUND FINANCING RATE.— 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para9 graph (2), the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund financ10 ing rate under subsection (c) shall apply after the 

11 last day of the first calendar quarter ending more 

12 than 30 days after— 

13 ‘‘(A) the date of enactment of the Oil Spill 

14 Liability Trust Fund Maintenance Act; or 

15 ‘‘(B) if later, the last day of any calendar 

16 quarter for which the Secretary estimates that, 

17 as of the close of that quarter, the unobligated 

18 balance in the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund is 

19 less than $2,000,000,000. 

20 ‘‘(2) FUND BALANCE.—The Oil Spill Liability 

21 Trust Fund financing rate shall not apply during a 

22 calendar quarter if the Secretary estimates that, as 

23 of the close of the preceding calendar quarter, the 

24 unobligated balance in the Oil Spill Liability Trust 

25 Fund exceeds $3,000,000,000.’’. 

Æ
Order entered July 9, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01380-CR

No. 05-13-01381-CR

WILSON BLUE III, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-62630-J; F12-62631-3

ORDER

Appellant’s July 3, 2014 motion to accept the brief tendered is GRANTED. Appellant’s 

brief received by the Clerk of the Court on July 3, 2014 is DEEMED timely filed on the date of 

this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Jeff
      Criswell, President of Cyberads, Inc. (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





This
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,
      2006,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"), fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      December 21, 2006




/s/
      JEFF CRISWELL


Jeff
      Criswell


President
# Iris Oifigiúil C NaN/2013

| | ISSN 1977-107X
  doi:10.3000/1977107X.C_2013.048.gle |
| --- | --- |
| Iris Oifigiúil
  an Aontais Eorpaigh | C NaN |
| | |
| An t-eagrán Gaeilge | Faisnéis agus Fógraí | 5619 Feabhra 2013 |

ISSN 1977-107X

doi:10.3000/1977107X.C_2013.048.gle

Iris Oifigiúil

an Aontais Eorpaigh

C NaN

An t-eagrán Gaeilge

Faisnéis agus Fógraí

5619 Feabhra 2013

---

| | Clár | Leathanach |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Fógairtí |
| | NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN |
| | Parlaimint na hEorpa |
| 2013/C /01 | Cinneadh | 1 |

Clár

Leathanach

V   Fógairtí

NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN

Parlaimint na hEorpa

2013/C /01

Cinneadh

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Faoin tagairt C 48 a foilsíodh ábhar an eagráin seo i dteangacha oifigiúla eile an Aontais Eorpaigh. |

---

(1)   Faoin tagairt C 48 a foilsíodh ábhar an eagráin seo i dteangacha oifigiúla eile an Aontais Eorpaigh.

1

| GA | |
| --- | --- |

GA

---

V Fógairtí

NÓSANNA IMEACHTA RIARACHÁIN

Parlaimint na hEorpa

| 19.2.2013 | GA | Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh | C NaN/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2013

GA

Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh

C NaN/1

---

CINNEADH

2013/C 48/01

TÁ ARD-RÚNAÍ PHARLAIMINT NA hEORPA,

Ag féachaint do Rialachán (CEE, Euratom, CEGC) Uimh. 259/68 ón gComhairle arna leasú ag Rialachán (CE, Euratom) Uimh. 723/2004 agus is déanaí ag Rialachán (AE, Euratom) Uimh. 1080/2010 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle an 24 Samhain 2010 lena leasaítear Rialacháin Foirne Oifigigh na gComhphobal Eorpach agus Coinníollacha Fostaíochta Sheirbhísigh eile na gComhphobal Eorpach, agus go háirithe Airteagal 30 de na Rialacháin Foirne sin,

Ag féachaint don chinneadh ón mBiúró an 3 Bealtaine 2004 maidir le tarmligean chumhachtaí an údaráis cheapacháin agus an údaráis a chumhachtaítear chun conarthaí fostaíochta a thabhairt i gcrích (ÚCCTC), arna leasú is déanaí ag an mBiúró an 4 Bealtaine 2009,

Ag féachaint don dáta éagtha, an 31 Nollaig 2012, de phainéil seo a leanas Pharlaimint na hEorpa:

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006, AST/5/08, PE/69/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S agus PE/119/S,

Ag féachaint do thuairim an Chomhchoiste a seachadadh ag cruinniú an Chomhchoiste an 21 Samhain 2012,

TAR ÉIS A CHINNEADH:

Airteagal 1

Tá tréimhse bailíochta na bpainéal seo a leanas:

AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, AST/5/08, PE/96/S, PE/110/S agus PE/119/S

fadaithe go dtí an 31 Nollaig 2013.

Airteagal 2

Níl tréimhse bailíochta na bpainéal seo a leanas:

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, C/348, AST/1/05, AST/1/06 agus PE/69/S

fadaithe.

Arna dhéanamh i Lucsamburg an 20 Nollaig 2012.

Klaus WELLE

Ard-Rúnaí

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2380 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2380

            To reduce temporarily the duty on ferroniobium.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

Mr. Rockefeller introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To reduce temporarily the duty on ferroniobium.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FERRONIOBIUM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00        Ferroniobium       4.6%         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          (provided for in                                                   31/2015.......
                          subheading
                          7202.93.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         291,988
<SECURITIES>                                 2,473,080
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,730,162
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 36,425,012
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,191,763
<PP&E>                                       1,268,552
<DEPRECIATION>                                 231,275
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,229,040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       29,416,281
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       726,076
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,086,683
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,229,040
<SALES>                                     17,566,977
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,785,709
<CGS>                                       11,825,186
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,825,186
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,608,258
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,087,389
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,264,876
<INCOME-TAX>                                   859,887
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,404,989
<DISCONTINUED>                                 201,916
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,203,073
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
Land
      Transfer Agreement


    


    Party
      A:
      Taian Ruitai Cellulose Co., Ltd

    


    Party
      B:
      Shandong Ruitai Chemical Co., Ltd

    


    Whereas:
      

    


    1.  In
      order
      to accelerate industrial development and after the approval of relevant
      government authorities, Party A intends to acquire a land covering an area
      of
      144000.72 square meters (equal to 216 mu) from Party B. 

     

    2.  Party
      B
      agrees to transfer a land owned by it covering 144000.72 square meters (equal
      to
      216 mu) to Party A.

     

    Now
      therefore, In
      accordance with the Land Administration Law of the People’s Republic of China
      and Municipal Announcement of the People’s Government of Feicheng City, and
      through friendly negotiation,
      Party A
      and Party B hereby agree as follows:

    


    1.  Party
      A
      agrees to acquire from Party B and Party B agrees to transfer to Party A a
      land
      covering an area of 144,000.72 square meters (equal to 216 mu) at the current
      market price of RMB 120,000 per mu. The formula to calculate the land transfer
      fee is as follows: 

    


    216
      mu *
      RMB 120,000 yuan /mu= RMB 25,920,000.00

    


    2.  Terms
      of
      Payment: Party A shall have paid up the land acquisition fee to Party B in
      installment bythe end of 2006 as agreed by both parties.

    


    3.  .
      Any
      matter not covered herein shall be settled by both parties through friendly
      negotiation.

    


    4.  This
      Agreement is made in quadruplicate, each party holds one, and another two are
      submitted to the township government and land administration bureau for
      recording, respectively.

    


    5.  This
      Agreement takes effect as from the date of signature by both
      parties.

    


    
      
         

      

      
        1

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
      by
      their respective duly authorized officers as of the date hereinbelow
      written.

     

    Party
      A:
      Taian Ruitai Cellulose Co., Ltd

     

    Authorized
      Representative: _________________

    
 

    Party
      B:
      Shandong Ruitai Chemical Co., Ltd

     

    Authorized
      Representative: _________________


     

     

    Date:
      October 25, 2006

    


    
      
         

      

      
        2
(Reap. Dec. 9973)

#### R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc. v. United States

Entry Nos. 762986; 821112; 754686.

(Decided April 12, 1961)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*William H. Orriok, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule consists of wood-enware articles, imported from Japan. The merchandise was invoiced at certain unit prices which included charges for items listed on the invoices as “Inland Freight from Factory to port,” “Other Charges,” and “Buying comm, 6% on Factory.” It was entered at the invoiced unit values, less the charges for the foregoing items, and was appraised at the invoiced unit values, plus the charge for buying commission.

Counsel for both parties have filed the statements required by rule 15(d) (1), from which it appears that there is no dispute that the basis of valuation contended for by both parties is export value, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, and, nothing to the contrary appearing, I find and hold that to be the correct basis of valuation for the merchandise involved.

The appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon stipulation of counsel that such value, for each item of merchandise, is the invoice unit value, net packed, less the items invoiced as inland freight from factory to port.

On the agreed facts, I find such value to be the value of the merchandise, and judgment will issue accordingly.
#### Charles W. POWELL v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.

No. 98-CC-2862.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 15, 1999.

Rehearing Denied March 12, 1999.

*644IN RE: Exxon Corporation;- — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “A”, Number 95-15501; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Number 98CA-1755.

Granted and remanded to court of appeal for briefing, argument and opinion.

CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2364 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2364

To extend the availability of low-interest refinancing under the local 
development business loan program of the Small Business Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2012

Ms. Snowe (for herself, Ms. Landrieu, and Mrs. Shaheen) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Small Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the availability of low-interest refinancing under the local 
development business loan program of the Small Business Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LOW-INTEREST REFINANCING UNDER THE LOCAL DEVELOPMENT 
              BUSINESS LOAN PROGRAM.

    Section 1122(b) of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 (15 U.S.C. 
696 note) is amended by striking ``2 years'' and inserting ``3 years''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[106th Congress Public Law 371]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ371.106]

Public Law 106-371
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To increase the amount authorized to be <<NOTE: Oct. 27, 2000 -  [H.R. 
3577]>> appropriated for the north side pumping division of the Minidoka 
                       reclamation project, Idaho.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 5 of the 
Act of September 30, 1950 (chapter 1114; 64 Stat. 1085), authorizing 
appropriations for the north side pumping division of the Minidoka 
reclamation project, Idaho, is amended by striking ``$11,395,000'' and 
inserting ``$14,200,000''.

    Approved October 27, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3577:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106-599 (Comm. on Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 106-435 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            May 8, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 13, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```