alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2310 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2310

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on woven fabrics containing 
              85 percent or more by weight of vicuna hair.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 19, 2012

 Mr. Lieberman introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on woven fabrics containing 
              85 percent or more by weight of vicuna hair.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WOVEN FABRICS CONTAINING 85 PERCENT OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF 
              VICUNA HAIR.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.23 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to woven fabrics containing 85 
percent or more by weight of vicuna hair) is amended by striking the 
date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));                and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                |   |   |                                                                                     |
|---------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |   |   | /s/ ROBERT                T. FABER                                                  |
|                     |   |   | Robert                  T. Faber*President                  and Chief Executive Officer* |
|                |   |   |                                                                                     |
| September 21 , 2005 |   |   |                                                                                     |

----
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 3.111

STATE OF DELAWARE
SECRETARY OF STATE
DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
FILED 09:00 AM 04/20/1992
752111003-2295029

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                          CARDINAL BUSINESS MEDIA, INC.

            1. The name of the corporation is:

                  Cardinal Business Media, Inc.

            2. The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is
32 Loockerman Square, Suite L-100, in the City of Dover, County of Kent. The
name of its registered agent at such address is The Prentice-Hall Corporation
System, Inc.

            3. The nature of the business or purposes to be conducted or
promoted is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may
be organized under the General Corporation Law of Delaware.

            4. The total number of shares of stock which the corporation shall
have authority to issue is One Thousand (1,000), all of which shall be common
stock; and the par value of each share shall be one cent ($.01).

            5. The name and mailing address of the incorporator is:

                  Victoria C. Phelps
                  Latham & Watkins
                  633 West Fifth Street
                  Suite 4000
                  Los Angeles, California 90071

            6. In furtherance and not in limitation of the powers conferred by
statute, the Board of Directors is expressly authorized to adopt, amend or
repeal the bylaws of the corporation.
<PAGE>

            7. Election of directors need not be by written ballot unless the
bylaws of the corporation shall so provide.

            8. No director of this corporation shall be personally liable to the
corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary
duty as a director, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director's
duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or
omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing
violation of the law, (iii) under Section 174 of the General Corporation Law of
Delaware, or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an
improper personal benefit.

            I, THE UNDERSIGNED, being the sole incorporator hereinbefore named,
for the purpose of forming a corporation pursuant to the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware, do make this certificate, herein declaring and
certifying that this is my act and deed and the facts herein stated are true,
and accordingly have hereunto set my hand this 17th day of April, 1992.


                              /s/ Victoria C. Phelps
                              --------------------------------
                              Victoria C. Phelps


                                       2
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2359 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain food processors. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain food processors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOD PROCESSORS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Food processors, each containing a DC motor with a 

minimum of two speeds, the 

foregoing having adjustable 

slicing disks and a sealable 

clear plastic bowl (provided 

for in subheading 

8509.40.00) ........................... 1.0% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2359 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
National Cancer Institute

u.s. Department 

of health and

human services National Institutes

of Health

Managing Chemotherapy Side Effects

Hair Loss

(Alopecia)

It may help to join a support 

group to talk with others whose 

hair has fallen out during 

cancer treatment. 

Questions other people 

have asked:

Why will my hair fall out?

Chemotherapy can harm the cells that 

make hair. This means that hair on your 

head and anywhere on your body may 

fall out. Hair loss is called “alopecia.” 

When will my hair start to 

fall out?

Your hair may start to fall out 2 to 3 

weeks after chemotherapy begins.

What can I do before my hair 

falls out?

“Treat your hair gently.”

Wash it with a mild 

shampoo. Pat it dry with 

a soft towel.

“Cut your hair short.”

Some people choose to cut 

their hair short. 

“Shave your head.” 

If you shave your 

head, use an electric 

shaver so you won’t 

cut your scalp.

“Get a wig.”

If you plan to buy a wig 

or hairpiece, get one while 

you still have hair. This 

way you can match it to 

the color of your hair.

“Losing my hair was hard at first. 

Then I got used to it, and it wasn’t so 

bad. Sometimes I wore a scarf and 

other times I left my head uncovered.”
Managing Chemotherapy Side Effects: Hair Loss (Alopecia)

What should I do after my hair falls out?

l Protect your head from the sun. 

Use sunscreen or wear a hat when 

you are outside.

l Protect your head from the cold. 

Wear a hat or scarf.

l Try wearing a soft scarf when you sleep.

When will my hair grow back?

Most likely your hair will grow back in 2 to 3 

months after chemotherapy. Sometimes your 

new hair can be curlier or straighter—or even a 

different color. In time it may go back to how it 

was before treatment.

Questions to ask 

your doctor or nurse:

1. Will my hair fall out?

2. How should I protect and care for my head?

3. Where can I get a wig or hairpiece? Will my 

insurance pay for it?

4. Are there support groups that can help me 

cope with hair loss?

5. When will my hair grow back?

NIH Publication No. 08-6508

Printed August 2008

Free Services to Learn More

National Cancer Institute

Cancer Information Service

Phone: 1-800-4-CANCER (1-800-422-6237)

TTY: 1-800-332-8615

Online: www.cancer.gov

Chat Online: www.cancer.gov/help
No. 55633.

#### Wellman Peck & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 139646-K (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2348 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2348

   To suspend temporarily the duty on cyclopentylpropionyl chloride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2012

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on cyclopentylpropionyl chloride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYCLOPENTYLPROPIONYL CHLORIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Cyclopentylpropion  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        yl chloride (CAS                                                   31/2015.......
                        No. 104-97-2)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        2916.20.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### F. W. Kuehne Co. *v.*United States

No. 6212.

Invoices dated Prague, Czechoslovakia, December 24, 1938, etc.

Certified December 28, 1938, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., January 17, 1939, etc.

Entry No. 787501, etc.

(Decided August 29, 1945)

*Eugene R. Piclcrell*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

*421Oliver, Presiding Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby‘stipulated and agreed by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, that the facts and issues involved in the appeals to reappraisement listed in schedule “A” attached hereto, are 'the same in all material respects as the facts and issues -involved in *F. W. Kuehne Co.*v. *United States,*Reappraisement Decisions 5985 and 6110.

> That on the date of exportation, the price at which the merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Czechoslovakia for home consumption, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, was the invoice value of the merchandise, packed, plus 8 per centum turnover tax, less nondutiable charges as invoiced. .

> That the export value on the date of exportation was not higher than the foreign value.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the record in Reappraisement Decisions No. 5985 and 6110 be incorporated as a part of the record in these appeals to reappraisement and that these appeals to reappraisement are submitted upon this • stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such .values are the invoice values, plus 8 per centum turnover tax, less freight and consular tax as invoiced, packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 40582.

#### Protests 842141-G, etc., of N. S. Glauber et al. (Cleveland, etc.).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit
        32




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**





In
      connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Summit Environmental
      Corporation, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
      December 31, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Doug Cox, Chief Executive Officer of the
      Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:
                May 7, 2007*/s/
                Doug Cox*Doug
                Cox
              Chairman
                and Chief Executive Officer





The
      above
      certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB
      or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lawrence Financial Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report),

I, RobRoy Walters, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

        1. The report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




                               /s/ RobRoy Walters
                           ----------------------------
                             Chief Financial Officer
                                 RobRoy Walters
                                 August 12, 2004




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       28
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 3.119


                                                           1491090
                                                          ENDORSED
                                                            FILED
                                                    In the office of the
                                                     Secretary of State
                                                 of the State of California

                                                         DEC 21 1990

                                              MARCH FONG EU, Secretary of State

                           ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                           Go Lo Entertainment, Inc.

                                     I. NAME

      The name of the corporation is Go Lo Entertainment, Inc.

                                   II. PURPOSE

      The purpose of the corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity
for which a corporation may be organized under the General Corporation Law of
California other than the banking business, the trust company business, or the
practice of a profession permitted to be incorporated by the California
Corporations Code.

                        III. AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS

      The name and address in this state of the corporation's initial agent for
service of process is:

                                Alberto Lopez
                                3101 Pomona Blvd.
                                Pomona, CA 91764

                                    IV. STOCK

      The corporation is authorized to issue only one class of shares having a
total number of one million shares.


                                    EXECUTION

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, who is the incorporator of this
incorporation, has executed these Articles of Incorporation on December 18,
1990.

                                                     /s/ Alberto Lopez
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Alberto Lopez, Incorporator


                                       -1-
<PAGE>

                                   DECLARATION

            I declare that I am the person who executed the above Articles of
Incorporation, and such instrument is my act and deed.

            Executed on December 18, 1990, at Pomona, California.

                                                        /s/ Alberto Lopez
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Alberto Lopez


                                       -2-
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22E0024. MARTS v. MARTS.

Brooke Christy Marts has filed an emergency motion seeking a 45-day

extension of time to file a notice of appeal from an order that, among other things,

modifies child custody. The order is subject to direct appellate review under OCGA

§ 5-6-34 (a) (11) (providing for direct appellate review of “[a]ll judgments or orders

in child custody cases awarding, refusing to change, or modifying child custody or

holding or declining to hold persons in contempt of such child custody judgment or

orders”). This court has the authority to grant an extension for the movant to file a

notice of direct appeal pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-39 (a) (1), but that extension cannot

be for more than 30 days. See OCGA § 5-6-39 (c) (permitting one extension which

“shall not exceed the time otherwise allowed for the filing of the notices initially”).

We therefore GRANT the movant a 30-day extension. The movant shall have

through and including January 17, 2022 to file her notice of appeal in the trial court.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

December 17, 2021

12/17/2021
#### Tracey Neidert et al., Appellants, v Austin S. Edgar, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[612 NYS2d 529]

—Order and judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion granted and new trial granted. Memorandum: Plaintiff's commenced *1031this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff Tracey Neidert when the automobile in which she was a passenger was struck by a delivery van owned by defendant Austin S. Edgar, Inc., and operated by defendant Joe L. Anthony. The accident occurred on Route 21 in the Town of Naples. At trial, defendants presented expert opinion testimony of a meteorologist concerning general weather conditions throughout Western New York and the Finger Lakes region. Based upon his understanding of those general conditions, the expert concluded that there was black ice on roads in the area. He further testified, however, that there was no basis for concluding whether there was black ice present on Route 21 at the time and place of the accident.

Supreme Court erred in denying plaintiffs’ motion to strike that testimony. The meteorologist’s opinion that the weather conditions prevailing in the region could produce areas of black ice supports only speculation about actual conditions at the accident scene *(see, New York Canners v Milbourne,*247 NY 460, 464). "Expert opinions which are ' "contingent, speculative or merely possible” ’ lack probative force and are, therefore, inadmissible” *(People v Robinson,*174 AD2d 998, 999, *lv denied*78 NY2d 1014, quoting *Matott v Ward,*48 NY2d 455, 461; *Strohm v New York, Lake Erie & W. R. R. Co.,*96 NY 305, 305-306). The meteorologist’s opinion concerning the possible presence of black ice provided the jury with a basis for finding that the accident was caused by unforeseeable road conditions rather than the negligence of defendant Anthony.

Supreme Court also erred in charging the jury on the rules applicable to the standard of care in an emergency situation. The emergency doctrine instruction should not be given where, as here, defendant driver should reasonably have anticipated and been prepared to deal with the situation with which he was confronted *(see, Hardy v Sicuranza,*133 AD2d 138). The testimony at trial clearly established that defendant Anthony was aware that the road surface was slushy and slippery. Furthermore, defendant Anthony admitted that he had problems keeping control of the van when it fishtailed on four occasions prior to the accident. Thus, this accident was not the result of a "sudden and unforeseen occurrence” *(Rivera v New York City Tr. Auth.,*77 NY2d 322, 327) that would entitle defendants to an emergency doctrine instruction. Plaintiffs are entitled, therefore, to a new trial *(see, Corelli v City of New York,*88 AD2d 810; *see also, Hugelmaier v Town*
      *1032
      *of Sweden,*144 AD2d 934, *lv dismissed*74 NY2d 699). (Appeal from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Galloway, J.—Set Aside Verdict.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Lawton, Wesley and Callahan, JJ.