alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael A. PARFAIT.

No. 60166.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 5, 1977.

In re: Michael A. Parfait, applying for supervisory writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for a stay order.

Writ and stay order refused. There is no merit in the application.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42974]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21053]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-670-000]


Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Application

August 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 28, 1997, Texas Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Gas), 3800 Frederica Street, Owensboro, Kentucky 
42301, filed, in Docket No. CP97-670-000, an abbreviated application 
pursuant to Sections 7(b) and 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act and Part 157 
of The Commission's Regulations for a certificate of public convenience 
and necessity authorizing Texas Gas to: (1) replace 5,121 feet of 20-
inch pipeline with 5,121 feet of 12-inch pipeline, (2) replace twelve 
4-inch well line side valves, (3) construct approximately 1,590 feet of 
4-inch pipeline, and (4) abandon by removal approximately 555 feet of 
8-inch pipeline and 250 feet of 4-inch pipeline at Texas Gas' Hanson 
Storage Field, all as more fully set forth in the application which is 
on file with the Commission and open for public inspection.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said application should on or before August 26, 1997, file 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20426, 
a motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the requirements 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 
385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). 
All protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
make the Protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any 
hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
Commission's Rules.
    Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be 
held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on 
this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time 
required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter 
finds that a grant of the certificate is required by the public 
convenience and necessity. If a motion for leave to intervene is timely 
filed, or if the Commission on its own motion believes that a formal 
hearing is required, further notice of such hearing will be duly given.
    Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised, 
it will be unnecessary for Texas Gas to appear or be represented at the 
hearing.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21053 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

GARY L. GUYAUX,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 224 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24th day of December, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 147 (Thursday, July 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20137]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[Program Announcement 761]


Replication and Dissemination of Effective Breast and Cervical 
Cancer Health Education Interventions

Amendment

    A notice announcing the availability of fiscal year (FY) 1997 funds 
for cooperative agreements for the Replication and Dissemination of 
Effective Breast and Cervical Cancer Health Education Interventions was 
published in the Federal Register on July 8, 1997, (62 FR 36522). The 
notice is amended as follows:
    On page 36523, first column, under the heading ``Availability of 
Funds,'' the first two sentences are changed to read: ``Approximately 
$4.5 million will be available in FY 1997 to fund approximately 10 
awards. It is expected that the average award will be approximately 
$350,000, ranging from $350,000 to $500,000.''
    On page 36528, first column, under the heading ``Application 
Submission and Deadline,'' the date on lines nine and ten is changed to 
read ``on or before August 20, 1997.''
    All other information and requirements of the July 8, 1997, Federal 
Register notice remain the same.

    Dated: July 25, 1997.
Joseph R. Carter,
Acting Associate Director for Management and Operations, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 97-20137 Filed 7-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
No. 39265.

#### Protests 327815-G, etc., of Standard Novelty Works (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Trimmings in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230 were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31 as claimed.
Exhibit 32.1


                           INTRAOP MEDICAL CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intraop Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald
A. Goer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        /s/ Donald A. Goer
                                        ------------------
                                        Donald A. Goer
                                        Chief Executive Officer

                                        Date: August 17, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Intraop Medical Corporation and will be retained by Intraop Medical
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
NUMBER 13-20-00323-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

ISAAC G. RODRIGUEZ SR. 

D/B/A I & R TRUCKING AND 

RODRIGUEZ TRUCKING, Appellants,

v.

DENISE MAREZ, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND ON BEHALF OF 

THE ESTATE OF JUAN PEREZ, Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 156th District Court

of San Patricio County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa

This cause is before the Court on its own motion. On July 31, 2020, appellants

filed a notice attempting to appeal a final judgment entered by the 156th Judicial District 
2

of San Patricio County, Texas, in cause number S-17-5182CV-B. The final judgment was 

signed on January 7, 2020, more than six months before the notice of appeal was filed.

We now dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1 provides that an appeal is perfected when 

notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed, unless a motion for 

new trial is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)(1). Where a timely motion for new trial has 

been filed, notice of appeal shall be filed within ninety days after the judgment is 

signed. Id. R. 26.1(a). A motion for new trial was filed in this matter; however, the notice 

of appeal was filed more than six months after the judgment well beyond the ninety-day

limit.

On July 31, 2020, the Clerk of the Court notified appellants of this defect so that 

steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellants were advised 

that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court’s 

letter, the appeal would be dismissed. On December 8, 2020, appellants filed an 

amended notice of appeal. Appellants argue the trial court’s denial of appellants’ motion 

for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative the denial of appellants’

motion for new trial, and the related trial court activity extended the deadline for perfecting 

the appeal. 

A denial of a motion for new trial is not independently appealable and does not 

start a new timetable for perfecting the appeal. State Office of Risk Mgmt. v. Berdan, 335 

S.W.3d 421, 428 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2011, pet. denied). As such, 
3

appellants’ notice of appeal is untimely and the amended notice of appeal does not cure 

the defect.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and 

appellants’ failure to timely perfect their appeal, is of the opinion the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

 LETICIA HINOJOSA 

Justice

Delivered and filed on the 

4th day of February, 2021.
No. 99-7824.

#### Williams *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results of operations of the Company for the period indicated. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:   May 23, 2011  |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |   |
| /s/ William J. Carden                 |   |
|                                  |   |
| William J. Carden                     |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |

----
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2401 

To suspend temporarily the duty on sports footwear for women (other than 

ski-boots, cross-country ski footwear, snowboard boots and golf shoes), 

with spikes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mrs. MURRAY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on sports footwear for 

women (other than ski-boots, cross-country ski footwear, 

snowboard boots and golf shoes), with spikes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SPORTS FOOTWEAR FOR WOMEN (OTHER THAN 

4 SKI-BOOTS, CROSS-COUNTRY SKI FOOTWEAR, 

5 SNOWBOARD BOOTS AND GOLF SHOES), WITH 

6 SPIKES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2401 IS

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Sports footwear for women 

(other than ski-boots, crosscountry ski footwear, 

snowboard boots and golf 

shoes), with spikes (provided 

for in subheading 

6402.19.15) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

5 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

6 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42976-42977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21054]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. DR97-2-000]


Wisconsin Public Service Corp.; Notice of Filing

August 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 24, 1997, Wisconsin Public Service 
Corporation (WPSC) filed an Application for Change of Depreciation 
Rates pursuant to Section 302 of the Federal Power Act. The proposed 
changes to depreciation rates are for accounting purposes only.
    WPSC requests authorization to implement accelerated depreciation 
for its ownership share of the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant, effective 
February 21, 1997. WPSC also requests authorization to implement 
depreciation rate changes for certain jointly-owned, non-nuclear 
facilities, effective January 1, 1997. WPSC states that these 
depreciation rates have been authorized by the Wisconsin Public Service 
Commission for purposes of retail ratemaking.
    WPSC further states that it is asking the Commission's Chief 
Accountant for authorization to defer recovery of the wholesale portion 
of the accelerated depreciation for the nuclear plant by recording the 
increased wholesale depreciation as a regulatory asset in Account No. 
182.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before August 18, 1997. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the

[[Page 42977]]

Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary
[FR Doc. 97-21054 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000433

03-DEC-2015

08:43 AM
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of Metabolix, Inc. (the “Company”) forthe quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Richard P. Eno,President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of theCompany and Joseph D. Hill, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial andAccounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to ourknowledge that:

 
| 1.     |   | The Report fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                          |
| 2.     |   | The information in the  Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Company.                  |

 

This certification is beingprovided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of theReport, nor is it to be deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.

 
| Dated: November 6,  2008 | /s/   RICHARD P.  ENO                 |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                          | * *                                        |
|                          | *President and Chief Executive  Officer*        |
|                          | *(Principal Executive Officer)*                 |
|                          |                                            |
| Dated: November 6,  2008 | /s/   JOSEPH D.  HILL                 |
|                          | * *                                        |
|                          | *Chief Financial Officer*                       |
|                          | *(Principal Financial and  Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350

                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, Tai Caihua, President and Chairman of the Board (principal executive officer)
of China Digital  Wireless,  Inc.  (the  "Registrant"),  certify  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002,  that,  based  upon a review of the Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB for the
period ended December 31, 2005 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                                            /s/ Tai Caihua
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Name: Tai Caihua
                                                      Date: April 4, 2006
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Identity theft.**
 
2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc Number:J 29.42:
Item Number:0717-R-22 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000629972
 
November 26, 2018
#### Robert RICHARD, Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant, v. ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellants-Appellees.

No. 5999.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

May 13, 1977.

Rehearing Denied June 24, 1977.

See also, La.App., 318 So.2d 83.

*1328William J. Doran, Jr., Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant-appellee.

Dubuisson, Brinkhaus & Dauzat by Jimmy L. Dauzat, Opelousas, for plaintiff-ap-pellee-appellant.

Gist, Methvin & Trimble by H. B. Gist, Jr., Alexandria, for defendants-appellees.

Before DOMENGEAUX, GUIDRY and ROGERS, JJ.

GUIDRY, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of *Shively et al. v. Pickens et al.,*346 So.2d 1314, we conclude that the accident giving rise to this litigation was caused solely and proximately by the negligence of the defendant, State of Louisiana, through the Department of Highways. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s determination that the defendant is liable in damages to the plaintiff.

In this case the trial court awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $4120.15 for both special and general damages. The amount due as special damages was stipulated. The trial judge awarded plaintiff the sum of $3000.00 in general damages, his injuries being described in trial judge’s written reasons for judgment as follows:

> “The court finds that as a result of this accident, the plaintiff sustained a cervical and lumbosacral strain, was struck in the groin, and suffered contusions of his chest and right ankle.”

Although the Highway Department does not question the quantum of this award we have reviewed same in light of the principles of appellate review of damage awards recently reiterated in *Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.,*341 So.2d 332 (La.1977) and conclude that such award should not be disturbed.

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed, defendant-appellant to be taxed with such costs as are legally assessable against it under LSA-R.S. 13:4521.

AFFIRMED.
No. 99-7789.

#### Van Hoorelbeke v. United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EX-10.30



 






Exhibit 10.30




Fifth
Amendment to Electro-Optical Sciences, Inc. Lease



This
amendment is made the 23th day of July, 2007, by and between Bridge Street Commercial, LLC, a
New York Limited Liability Company having an office at One Bridge
Street, Irvington, New York
10533, and Electro - Optical Sciences, Inc., a Corporation having an office at One Bridge Street,
Irvington, New York 10533.




Witnesseth:




     Whereas, Owner (Bridge Street Properties, LLC) and Tenant (Electro-Optical Sciences, Inc.)
entered into a lease dated December 16th, 1998 of certain premises located at One Bridge Street,
Irvington New York and




     Whereas, the term of the lease set forth therein is three years commencing upon, December 16,
1998 and ending upon December 15, 2001 and has previously been amended most recently on March 27,
2006



     Now, Therefore, the parties hereto agree as follows:




	 	1.	 	The term of the 5th amendment set forth herein will add Suite 11 at 2,365 square
feet for a term of 3.5 years commencing on September 1, 2007 and will end on January
31, 2011.
	 
	 	2.	 	The rate to be paid monthly / yearly will be as follows:





	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Yearly	 	Monthly
	9/1/07 — 8/31/08
	 	$	66,220.00	 	 	$	5,518.33	 
	9/1/08
— 8/31/09
	 	$	68,206.60	 	 	$	5,683.88	 
	9/1/09 — 8/31/10
	 	$	70,252.80	 	 	$	5,854.40	 
	9/1/10
— 1/31/11
	 	$	72,360.38	 	 	$	6,030.03	 







	 	3.	 	Security Deposit due will be $5,518.33 and will increase
according to Lease
Provisions.
	 
	 	4.	 	Seven (7) additional parking spaces will be added.
	 
	 	5.	 	Owner will remove platform, paint walls and install carpet in main area and remove
electrical wiring.
	 
	 	6.	 	Continuation of Lease Provisions: Except as amended herein, all other terms and
conditions of the Lease and previous amendments shall remain in full force and effect
for the duration of the Lease.








	 	 	 	 
	 
	/s/  WILLIAM J.
THOMPSON	 	/s/  RICHARD I.
STEINHART	 
	 	 	 	 
	Bridge Street Commercial, LLC	 	Electro-Optical Science, Inc.	 
	 
	Managing Member	 	VP & CFO	 
	 	 	 	 
	Title	 	Title	 
	 

	8/24/07	 	8/16/07	 
	 	 	 	 
	Date	 	Date	 







34