alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 9947)

#### William W. Mendenhall, Jr. *v.*United States

Entry No. F-11.

(Decided March 15, 1961)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*William S. Orrick, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain maps exported from Canada and entered at the port of Fairbanks, Alaska.

On an agreed set of facts, upon which the case has been submitted, it is established that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is constructed value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (70 Stat. 943), and that such statutory value for each of the items involved herein is as follows:

> 2 Autopositives (one set)_$962.50

> 2 Ozalid prints, each $2.50_ 5. 00

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
(Reap. Dec. 9943)

#### Globe Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 972436.

(Decided March 7, 1961)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*William H. Orriclc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General *(Henry J. O’Neill,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

DoNLON, Judge:

In this appeal to reappraisement, tried at a Chicago term, the controller of H. M. Harper Co. was present in court. It appearing, after conference between this gentleman and counsel for defendant, that H. M. Harper Co. was the importer of the merchandise and that there was ho longer any controversy as to its value, counsel for defendant was permitted to develop the record and state the stipulation of facts on which the case is decided.

There is no dispute that the statutory conditions for a finding of foreign value did not obtain. The merchandise consists of certain machinery (four items), exported from West Germany on May 16, 1958, and entered at the port of New York on June 4,1958.

At the time appeal was filed, the issue was whether the merchandise had been sold at prices c.i.f. New York or c.i.f. the German port. Basically, of course, the issue involved was also where the principal market was, and what was the value of the merchandise in that market. Defendant now accepts the values as those in the principal market in West Germany and has stipulated with plaintiff what those values are, as follows:

> Mr. O’Neill: Well, there are four items of merchandise. The unit value of the first one is $14,118.91; the second item is $310; the third is $375; and the fourth is $325.

Accepting this as a stipulation of fact, and on all the facts of record, I find as facts:

*6321. That the merchandise in litigation consists of a machine tool and parts, four items in all, exported from West Germany on May 16,1958.

2. That, on or about the date of exportation, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption in West Germany.

3. That, on or about the date of exportation, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale in West Germany to all purchasers for export to the United States at unit prices aggregating $15,129, packed.

I conclude as a matter of law:

1. That the proper basis of value for the merchandise of this appeal is export value, under section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

2. That the export value of the subject merchandise is $15,129, packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 5, 2019

a0529 

# Order

Clerk June 5, 2019

158633

BEATRICE ALGHALI and HAMID ALGHALI,

Plaintiffs,

and

PAIN MANAGEMENT & EMG,

Intervening Plaintiff,

v SC: 158633

COA: 343359

Wayne CC: 16

- 004334

- NI

HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY and

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY OF

AMERICA,

Defendants/Third

- Party Plaintiffs/

Cro ss

- Defendants

- Appellants,

and

ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant/Third

- Party Defendant/

Cross

- Plaintiff

- Appellee,

and

SCOTT DAVID WOODS,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 20, 2018

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for

consideration as on leave granted.
#### Kenneth ATHERTON, Appellant, v. Jacqueline ATHERTON, Appellee.

No. 76-1794.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 11, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 16, 1977.

Horton, Perse & Gingsberg and Mallory H. Horton, Miami, for appellant.

Heller & Kaplan and Daniel Neal Heller, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of the rule stated in *Shaw v. Shaw,*334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); *Herzog v. Herzog,*346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977). See also *Krischer v. Krischer,*337 So.2d 1011 (Fla.3d DCA 1976).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20619]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Revocation of License of Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration by the Final Order of the United States 
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, dated April 15, 
1997, the United States Small Business Administration hereby revokes 
the license of Blue Ridge Capital, L.P., a Limited Partnership, to 
function as a small business investment company under the Small 
Business Investment Company License No. 03/03-0175 issued to Blue Ridge 
Capital, L.P. on October 29, 1984 and said license is hereby declared 
null and void as of July 11, 1997.

    Dated: July 11, 1997.

United States Small Business Administration.
Don A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 97-20619 Filed 8-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries III, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: January 27, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries III, Inc.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

Certification of Treasurer



I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Big Sky Industries III, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: January 30, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer
(Reap. Dec. 9134)

#### Curt L. Sterner Co. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 17097; 801159; 827869-1/2.

(Decided April 24, 1958)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When these appeals for a reappraisement were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

*798I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by these appeals to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
2094_Sibley_U123_OETM Part III notes.txt

This file contains additional information for the 2094_Sibley_U123_Other_Emission_Test_Methods_Part_III.xls CO Emission Data: Worksheet deleted. Formaldehyde Emission Data: Worksheet deleted. CH4 Emission Data: Worksheet deleted. SO2 Emission Data: Method 6C entered in ERT. Worksheet deleted. Hg Emission Data 30B: The measured value and the emission rate value in lb/mmBtu are an average of both tubes (A&B). The units 1, 2 and 3 boilers are fueled by 85% subbituminous coal & 15% bituminous. The coal feed rate is the combined coal feedrate for units 1, 2, and 3 with 85% in fuel #1 and 15% in fuel #2. This value was converted to pounds per hour. The combined average hourly value for the day was entered with a note in the 'Other Supporting Information' column. Speciated Volatile Organic HAP: Worksheet deleted. Speciated Semi-Volatile Organic HAP: Worksheet deleted. HCN Emission Data: Worksheet deleted. HCl Emission Data: Worksheet deleted. HF Emission Data: Worksheet deleted. NOx Emission Data: Worksheet deleted.

Page 1
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

26) ll-K- (B) -14 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:48 AM Sheet 26 of 325 
P.2 

« »<? 

"-K-CB3-14 

INDUSTRIAL BOILER INFORMAL ANALYSIS WORKING GROUP. 

Letter from J.D. Mobley, EPArPTB to Distribution. 

November 6, 1979. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-14
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 18 (Tuesday, January 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2025]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1148-DR]


New York; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of New York, (FEMA-1148-DR), dated December 9, 1996, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 14, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of New York, is hereby amended to include the following area among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of December 9, 1996:

    Tompkins County for Individual Assistance (already designated 
for Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation).

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance.)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-2025 Filed 1-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
#### J. T. Steeb & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7469.

Invoice dated Manchester, England, May 19, 1941.

Certified May 19, 1941.

Entered at Portland, Oreg., July 16, 1941.

Entry No. 33.

(Decided December 9, 1947)

*Philip Stein*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Development Corp.,
a  Nevada  corporation  (the  "Company"),  on  Form  10-QSB for the period ended
November  30,  2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Betty-Ann Harland, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:


     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: January 14, 2005.

                                        /s/Betty-Ann Harland
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Betty-Ann Harland,
                                        Chief Executive Officer of
                                        International Development Corp.


<PAGE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1126 

To provide that no Federal funds may be expended for the payment or 

reimbursement of a drug that is prescribed to a sex offender for the 

treatment of sexual or erectile dysfunction. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2005 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mrs. CLINTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide that no Federal funds may be expended for 

the payment or reimbursement of a drug that is prescribed to a sex offender for the treatment of sexual 

or erectile dysfunction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NO FEDERAL FUNDS FOR DRUGS PRESCRIBED 

4 TO SEX OFFENDERS FOR THE TREATMENT OF 

5 SEXUAL OR ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION. 

6 (a) RESTRICTION.— 

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

8 provision of law, no Federal funds may be expended 
2 

•S 1126 IS

1 for the payment or reimbursement, including pay2 ment or reimbursement under the programs de3 scribed in paragraph (2), of a drug that is pre4 scribed to an individual described in paragraph (3) 

5 for the treatment of sexual or erectile dysfunction. 

6 (2) PROGRAMS DESCRIBED.—The programs de7 scribed in this paragraph are the medicaid program, 

8 the medicare program, the Federal employees health 

9 benefits program, the Defense Health Program, the 

10 program of medical care furnished by the Secretary 

11 of Veterans Affairs, health related programs admin12 istered by the Indian Health Service, health related 

13 programs funded under the Public Health Service 

14 Act, and any other Federal health program. 

15 (3) INDIVIDUAL DESCRIBED.—An individual de16 scribed in this paragraph is an individual who has 

17 a conviction for sexual abuse, sexual assault, or any 

18 other sexual offense. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall apply to 

20 drugs dispensed on or after the date of enactment of this 

21 Act. 

Æ
No. 39233.

#### Protest 252499-G of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230 were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31 as claimed.
No. 99-1079.

No. 99-1101.

#### Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc., et al.; and Patel *v.*OMH Medical Center, Inc., et al.

Sup. Ct. Okla. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 987 P. 2d 1185.
**Exhibit
      32.2**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**










In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Third Century Bancorp on Form 10-QSB
      for
      the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the “Report”), I, Debra K. Harlow, Chief Financial Officer of Third
      Century Bancorp, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Third
                Century Bancorp.













/s/
      Debra K.
      Harlow


Debra
      K.
      Harlow


Vice
      President, Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)





August
      10, 2007





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
      and is not being filed for any other purpose.
Exhibit
      32.1





Certification
      Pursuant to


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


(as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906


of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
      connection with the quarterly report Royal Spring Water Inc. (the “Company”), on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the
      undersigned of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
      the
      best of their knowledge:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written certification has been provided to the Company and
      will
      be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
                Alex HazanName:
                Alex HazanTitle:
                Chief Executive OfficerAugust
                22, 2006/s/
                Harel GoldsteinName:
                Harel GoldsteinTitle:
                Chief Financial OfficerAugust
                22, 2006





This
      Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This exhibit is not “filed” for purposes of Section
      18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as provided
      by applicable rules of the Securities Exchange Commission.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of eResource Capital Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
MICHAEL D. PRUITT, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: October 14, 2003

/s/ Michael D. Pruitt
------------------------------------
Michael D. Pruitt
Principal Financial Officer