alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                           INTRAOP MEDICAL CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intraop Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Howard Solovei, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

   (3) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (4) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


                                          /s/ Howard Solovei
                                        -------------------------------------
                                            Howard Solovei
                                            Chief Financial Officer

                                            Date:  May 9, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Intraop Medical Corporation and will be retained by Intraop Medical
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
No. 39242.

#### Protests 141022-G, etc., of Kupfer Bros. Imp. Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

On the record presented the protests were dismissed for lack of evidence.
No. 47136.

#### Protest 774752-G of Sprouse Reitz Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

From the uncontradicted evidence it was found that the pencil sharpeners in question are the same as those the subject of Abstract 46273. Following that decision the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 149 (Monday, August 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20479]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision
[AC-19: OTS No. 3682]


Citizens Savings Bank of Frankfort, Frankfort, Indiana; Approval 
of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on July 23, 1997, the Director, 
Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, or her designee, 
acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the application of 
Citizens Savings Bank of Frankfort, Frankfort, Indiana, to convert to 
the stock form of organization. Copies of the application are available 
for inspection at the Dissemination Branch, Office of Thrift 
Supervision, 1700 G Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20552, and the 
Central Regional Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 200 West Madison 
Street, Suite 1300, Chicago, Illinois 60606.

    Dated: July 30, 1997.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20479 Filed 8-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 145 (Tuesday, July 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40518]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19875]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3187-000]


Power Systems Group, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

July 23, 1997.
    Power Systems Group, Inc. (Power Group) submitted for filing a rate 
schedule under which Power Group will engage in wholesale electric 
power and energy transactions as a marketer. Power Group also requested 
waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, Power Group 
requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 
34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability 
by Power Group.
    On July 11, 1997, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Applications, Office of Electric Power Regulation, granted 
requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Power Group should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 
211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Power Group is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, endorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Power Group's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is August 11, 1997. Copies 
of the full text of the order are available from the Commission's 
Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-19875 Filed 7-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 42181.

#### Protests 629716-G, etc., of American Bluefriesveem et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the-authority of Abstract 41794 the protests were sustained.
#### Rufus FAIRLEY v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 49453.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 2, 1977.

W. S. Murphy, Lueedale, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Karen A. Gilfoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appel-lee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, George County; Darwin M. Maples, Judge.

Before SMITH, ROBERTSON and WALKER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

GILLESPIE, C. J., PATTERSON and IN-ZER, P. JJ, and SUGG, BROOM and LEE, JJ, concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 (the Report), I, Craig A. Knock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                         
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 7, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Craig A. Knock                                                                                                                      
|                       |  |  |  | Craig A. Knock Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer Principal Accounting Officer Iowa
Telecommunications Services, Inc.



38
___________

No. 95-1973

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Missouri.

Jozell Thomas James, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: December 5, 1995

 Filed: January 22, 1996

___________

Before FAGG, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Jozell Thomas James pleaded guilty to two counts of aiding and

abetting the distribution of cocaine base, in violation of 21

U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. James and the government

both objected to the drug quantity calculation proposed in James's

presentence report. At sentencing, with the government's drug

quantity witness in attendance, counsel advised the court that they

had reached a sentencing agreement that would permit withdrawal of

each party's objections. Most relevant for our purposes, that

agreement provided for a recommended guidelines sentencing range of

151 to 168 months in prison. The lower figure was the bottom of

the range urged by the government, while the higher figure was the

top of the range recommended in the PSR. James confirmed on the

record that this was his agreement with the government. The
 1

The HONORABLE STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, United States District

Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

-2-

district court1 then stated that the agreement was acceptable to

the court and sentenced James to 165 months in prison.

On appeal, James argues that the district court committed

plain error in calculating his total offense level and his Criminal

History Category. However, James may not attack on appeal a

sentencing term to which he specifically agreed in the district

court. See, e.g., United States v. Nguyen, 46 F.3d 781, 783 (8th

Cir. 1995). Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of GoldSpring, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert T. Faber,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and
      belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/ robert
      t. faber


Robert
      T.
      Faber


*Chief
      Financial Officer*








Date:
      August 15, 2005
# Federal Aviation Administration

RGL Home **Advisory Circular****Advisory Circular Information****Advisory Circular Information**** ****AC Number:**AC 43-206**Date:**05/30/2001** ****Change Description:**** ****Subject:**Inspection, Prevention, Control, and Repair of Corrosion on Avionics Equipment** ****Related Regulation(s):**Part 43**Section Number(s):**Unknown Section** ****Cancels:****Initiating Office:**AFS-300** ****Advisory Circular in PDF Format:**** ****Comments****Comments**
Comments:
FAA.gov Home |			Privacy Policy |			Web Policies & Notices |			Contact Us |			Help

**Readers & Viewers:**PDF Reader | MS Word Viewer | MS PowerPoint Viewer | MS Excel Viewer | Zip
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2358 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain pasta tools. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain pasta tools. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PASTA TOOLS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Pasta making parts, each 

having a stainless steel housing and anodized aluminum 

rollers and anodized aluminum cutters, the foregoing 

designed to be attached to a 

stand food mixer (provided 

for in subheading 

8509.90.55) ........................... 2.4% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2358 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 7, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 25506-25507]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10205]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 121


Crewmember and Dispatcher Training Programs

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this technical amendment to reserve 
subparts BB and CC in 14 CFR part 121. The FAA is engaged in rulemaking 
and anticipates codifying the new regulations in part 121 subparts BB 
and CC.

DATES: This rule is effective on May 7, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy Nordlie, Office of Rulemaking, 
Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-9677.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The FAA is engaged in rulemaking to revise regulations for 
crewmember and dispatcher training programs in domestic, flag, and 
supplemental operations. The FAA anticipates codifying the revised 
training regulations for crewmembers in subpart BB of part 121 and 
regulations for dispatchers in subpart CC of part 121. The FAA is 
issuing this technical amendment to reserve subparts BB and CC in 14 
CFR part 121 to ensure that these subparts will be available for this 
future rulemaking.

List of Subjects 14 CFR Part 121

    Air carriers, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Safety, Transportation.

The Amendment

0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration 
amends part 121 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:

PART 121--OPERATING REQUIREMENTS: DOMESTIC, FLAG, AND SUPPLEMENTAL 
OPERATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 121 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 40119, 41706, 44101, 44701-
44702, 44705, 44709-44711, 44713, 44716-44717, 44722, 46105.

[[Page 25507]]

Subpart BB--[Reserved]

0
2. Add and reserve subpart BB, consisting of Sec. Sec.  121.1200 
through 121.1399.

Subpart CC--[Reserved]

0
3. Add and reserve subpart CC, consisting of Sec. Sec.  121.1400 
through 121.1499.

    Issued in Washington, DC on May 1, 2008.
 Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
 [FR Doc. E8-10205 Filed 5-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Oscar BALLARD.

No. 98-K-2198.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1999.

*647In re Ballard, Oscar; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, first Circuit, No. KA97 0233; Parish of Livingston, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 11718.

Granted (See order attached).

JOHNSON, J., not on panel.
No. 00-6392.

#### Lines *v.*Larkins, Warden, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

         The following table sets forth all subsidiaries of Smith
International, Inc., other than inactive and insignificant subsidiaries that,
considered in the aggregate, would not constitute a significant subsidiary,
indicating the percentage of issued and outstanding voting securities
beneficially owned by it:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                   % of Direct
                                    Where                          and Indirect
Name of Subsidiary                  Incorporated                    Ownership
------------------                  ------------                   ------------

<S>                                 <C>                                <C>

Smith Internacional,
 S.A. de C.V.                       Mexico                             l00%
Omega II Insurance Ltd.             Bermuda                            l00%
S.I. Nederland B.V.                 Netherlands                        l00%
Smith International
 Acquisition Corp.                  Delaware                           100%
Smith International
 Australia (Pty) Ltd.               Australia                          l00%
Smith International
 Canada Ltd.                        Canada                             l00%
Smith International
 do Brasil Ltda.                    Brazil                             l00%
Smith International
 Deutschland GmbH                   Germany                            l00%
Smith International
 Gulf Services Ltd.*                U.A.E.                              49%
Smith International
 France, S.A.R.L.                   France                             l00%
Smith International
 Italia, S.p.A.                     Italy                              l00%
Smith International
 (North Sea) Ltd.                   Scotland                           l00%
Smith Internacional
 de Venezuela, C.A.                 Venezuela                          l00%

</TABLE>

-------------------------------------------------------------------

*        Not consolidated; accounted for on the equity method of
         accounting.

Except as indicated, all of the above subsidiaries are included in the
Company's consolidated financial statements.
#### TERRA NOVA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. “Joe” PAFFORD and Rita Pafford or other legal guardian of the minor, Kerry Pafford and/or Kerry “Doe”, “Joe” Armond and Sharon Armond, as legal guardians of the minor, Phillip Armond; Nicholas Christiana, as legal guardian of the minor, Michael Christiana; ABC Insurance Company, DEF Insurance Company and GHI Insurance Company.

No. 98-C-0383.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1998.

In re Terra Nova Insurance Co. Ltd., applying for reconsideration of this Court’s Order dated March 27, 1998: Parish of Jeffer*65son, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 468-0054; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 97-CA-0268.

Denied. Judgment is definitive.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.
No. 45338.

#### Protests 871730-G, etc., of Amerlux Steel Corp. et al. (Portland, Oreg., etc.).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2015205EN.01000602.xml

| 22.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 April 2015 — Issam Anbouba v Council of the European Union

(Case C-630/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic - Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime - Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded - Set of indicia))

(2015/C 205/08)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Issam Anbouba (represented by: M.-A. Bastin, J.-M. Salva and S. Orlandi, avocats)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Vitro, R. Liudvinaviciute and M.-M. Joséphidès, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Pardo Quintillán and F. Castillo de la Torre, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mr Issam Anbouba to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Issam Anbouba to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 45, 15.2.2014.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2405 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2405

To suspend temporarily the duty on thermoplastic biodegradable polymer 
                                 blend.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mr. Lieberman introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on thermoplastic biodegradable polymer 
                                 blend.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. THERMOPLASTIC BIODEGRADABLE POLYMER BLEND.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00         Thermoplastic      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          biodegradable                                                      31/2015
                          polymer blend
                          containing 1,4-
                          benzenedicarboxyl
                          ic acid, dimethyl
                          ester, polymer
                          with 1,4-
                          butanediol and
                          hexanedioic acid
                          (CAS No. 55231-08-
                          8) and/or 1,4-
                          benzenedicarboxyl
                          ic acid polymer
                          with 1,4
                          butanediol and
                          decanedioic acid
                          (CAS No. 28205-74-
                          5) and Starch
                          (CAS No. 9005-25-
                          8) and 1,4-
                          dioxane-2,5-
                          dione, 2,6-
                          dimethyl-(3R, 6R)-
                          polymer with rel-
                          (3R, 6S)-3,6-
                          dimethyl-1,4
                          dioxane-2,5-dione
                          and (3S, 6S)-3,6-
                          dimetyl-1,4-
                          dioxane-2,5-dione
                          (CAS No. 9051-89-
                          2) and 1,2,3-
                          propanetriol (CAS
                          No. 56-81-5)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3913.90.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```