alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                               Exhibit 10.1.6.a.

                               AMENDMENT TO THE
                             TERRA INDUSTRIES INC.
                              EXCESS BENEFIT PLAN

     Terra Industries Inc. desires to amend its Excess Benefit Plan as restated
as of January 1, 1992 (the "Plan"), all on the terms and conditions herein.
Accordingly, the Plan shall be amended by adding the following new Section 9
reading in its entirety as follows:

          "Section 9.  Legal Fees or Expenses.  The Company shall reimburse the
                       ----------------------
     Participant for any legal fees and expenses reasonably incurred in
     connection with the enforcement of Participant's rights under this Excess
     Benefit Plan; provided that the Company shall not be required to reimburse
     for such fees or expenses unless the resolution of any enforcement action
     taken by the Participant is substantially in favor of the Participant,
     whether by adjudication, settlement or otherwise."

     Except as provided herein or in the accompanying resolutions of the
Personnel Committee of the Terra Industries Inc. Board of Directors, the Plan
shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by
its duly authorized officer as of the 26/th/ day of  July, 2000.


                                             TERRA INDUSTRIES INC.


                                        By   /s/ George H. Valentine
                                             --------------------------

                                        Its  Senior Vice President
                                             --------------------------
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of China Recycling Energy Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Guohua Lu, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 1, 2011
/s/  Guohua KuGuohua KuChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Floyd W. Pickrell, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Gregory D. Waller, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|                             
|/S/    FLOYD W. PICKRELL,
JR.
|Floyd W. Pickrell, Jr.,      
|Chief Executive Officer      
|                             
|August 9, 2004               
|                             
|/S/    GREGORY D.
WALLER     
|Gregory D. Waller,           
|Chief Financial Officer      
|                             
|August 9, 2004               



This certification accompanies this
Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2198 

To implement common sense controls on the taxpayer-funded salaries of 

government contractors by limiting reimbursement for excessive compensation equal to the pay of the President of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2012 

Mrs. BOXER (for herself and Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To implement common sense controls on the taxpayer-funded 

salaries of government contractors by limiting reimbursement for excessive compensation equal to the pay of 

the President of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commonsense Con5 tractor Compensation Act of 2012’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ALLOWABLE GOVERNMENT CON7 TRACTOR COMPENSATION COSTS. 

8 (a) LIMITATION.— 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2198 IS

1 (1) CIVILIAN CONTRACTS.—Section 

2 4304(a)(16) of title 41, United States Code, is 

3 amended to read as follows: 

4 ‘‘(16) Costs of compensation of contractor and 

5 subcontractor employees for a fiscal year, regardless 

6 of the contract funding source, to the extent that 

7 such compensation exceeds the annual amount paid 

8 to the President of the United States in accordance 

9 with section 102 of title 3.’’. 

10 (2) DEFENSE CONTRACTS.—Section 

11 2324(e)(1)(P) of title 10, United States Code, is 

12 amended to read as follows: 

13 ‘‘(P) Costs of compensation of contractor and 

14 subcontractor employees for a fiscal year, regardless 

15 of the contract funding source, to the extent that 

16 such compensation exceeds the annual amount paid 

17 to the President of the United States in accordance 

18 with section 102 of title 3.’’. 

19 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

20 (1) REPEAL.—Section 1127 of title 41, United 

21 States Code, is hereby repealed. 

22 (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sec23 tions at the beginning of chapter 11 of title 41, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2198 IS

1 United States Code, is amended by striking the item 

2 relating to section 1127. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
This page is best viewed with JavaScript enabled. You may have disabled JavaScript or your browser does not support JavaScript.Skip NavigationU.S. Department of EducationInstitute of Education Sciences- NewsFlash 
- Staff 
- Contact 
- Site   Index 
- Help
 NCESProductsTables - Publications&   Products    - Search Publications&     Products 
  - Recent     Publications 
  - Data     Products Last 6 Months 
  - Subject Index A-Z 
  - Survey & Program     Areas 
  - Data Licenses 
- Surveys& Programs    - Assessments 
  - Early     Childhood 
  - Elementary/Secondary 
  - International 
  - Library 
  - Postsecondary 
  - Resources 
- Data Tools    - Locators 
  - Peer     Tools 
  - Questionnaire     Item Banks 
  - Build     Custom Tables and Datasets 
  - State/District     Profiles 
  - Offsite     Archive of NCES Data 
- Tables &Figures    - Search Tables/Figures 
  - Popular Keyword Title     Searches 
- Fast Facts    - Assessments 
  - Early     Childhood 
  - Elementary/Secondary 
  - International 
  - Library 
  - Postsecondary 
  - Resources 
- School,   College,& Library Search    - Search for Schools, Colleges, and     Libraries 
  - College Navigator 
  - Search for Public Schools 
  - Search for PublicSchool     Districts 
  - Search for     Private Schools 
  - Search for Public     Libraries 
- Annual Reports    - Condition of Education 
  - Digest of Education Statistics 
  - School Crime &     Safety 
  - Projections of Education     Statistics 
- What's New    - What's     New at NCES 
  - Recent     Publications 
  - Conferences/Training 
  - StatChat 
  - Press Releases 
  - Funding 
  - Jobs 
- About Us    - About NCES 
  - Commissioner 
  Overview  NAEP Activities  National  State  Long-Term Trend  Selected Schools  HS Transcript Study  Special Studies  NAEP             Technical  Documentation  Parents  Students  Researchers  Media  Educators  The Arts  Civics  Economics  Foreign             Language  Geography  Mathematics   Reading  Science  U.S. History  World             History  WritingHome             The             NIES StudyStudy             OverviewAbout             the AssessmentAbout             the SurveySurvey             QuestionnairesTechnical             Review PanelParticipationExclusionData             TablesAssessment             ResultsSurvey             ResultsResourcesMediaFAQsContact             Us
Click             here for non-Flash version.

Download the 2007 NIESPart I                   Report

Download the 2007 NIESPart II                   Report
NCES Headlines- Trends   in the Use of School Choice 1993-2007 
- Digest   of Education Statistics, 2009 
- Mini-Digest of   Education Statistics, 2009 
- Enrollment in   Postsecondary Institutions, Fall 2008
Pubs/Products|Surveys/Programs|DataTools|Tables/Figures|FastFacts|School/LibrarySearch|Annuals|What's New|Kids Zone|Institute of Education Sciences|NCER|NCEE|NCSERNewsFlash|Staff|Contact|Site Index|Help|RSS|Privacy Policy NCESProductsTables 1990 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006, USA Phone: (202) 502-7300 (map)Statistical Standards|FedStats.gov
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FirstBingo.com (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Richard L. Wachter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 14th day of May, 2004.



| | /s/ Richard Wachter
Richard L. Wachter
Chief Financial Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------









---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THOMAS E. ARCHIE, DECEASED JANUARY 31, 2018 § § No. 101 , 20 2 2 § § Court Below

— Court of § Chancery of the State of § Delaware § § C.A. 2020

- 0691

Submitted: October 14 , 20 2 2 Decided: November 18 , 20 2 2

Before VALIHURA , VAUGHN
, and TRAYNOR
, Justices.

ORDER
After consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we
conclude that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Court of
Chancery’s order
, entered February 23, 2022 (the “Final Judgment”). The Final
Judgment denied the appe llant’s exceptions to, and adopted, a Master in Chancery’s
Final Report, issued October 26, 2021 , which granted the appellees’ motion to
dismiss their own petition under Court of Chancery Rule 41(a)(2), in the absence of
any properly pleaded counterclaims

. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that judgment of the Court of
Chancery is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. V aughn, Jr. Justice
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2403 

To suspend temporarily the duty on sports footwear for persons other than 

men (other than ski-boots, cross-country ski footwear and snowboard 

boots), valued $12/pair or higher, with spikes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mrs. MURRAY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on sports footwear for 

persons other than men (other than ski-boots, crosscountry ski footwear and snowboard boots), valued $12/ 

pair or higher, with spikes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2403 IS

1 SECTION 1. SPORTS FOOTWEAR FOR PERSONS OTHER 

2 THAN MEN (OTHER THAN SKI-BOOTS, CROSS3 COUNTRY SKI FOOTWEAR AND SNOWBOARD 

4 BOOTS), VALUED $12/PAIR OR HIGHER, WITH 

5 SPIKES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Sports footwear for persons 

other than men (other than 

ski-boots, cross-country ski 

footwear and snowboard 

boots), valued $12/pair or 

higher, with spikes (provided 

for in subheading 

6402.19.90) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

12 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

13 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 00-6778.

#### Stephenson *v.*Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF The UNITED STATES; California Chamber of Commerce; Employers Group; California Healthcare Association; California Manufacturers and Technology Assn.; California Association of Health Facilities; California Association of Home & Services for the Aging; Bettec Corporation; Marksherm Corporation; Zilaco Inc., Zilaco; *891Del Rio Healthcare, Inc.; Beverly Health & Rehabilitation Services, Inc. dba Beverly Manor Costa Mesa; Internext Group, Plaintiffs-Appellees, American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations; California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO, Intervenors-Appellants, v. Bill LOCKYER, Attorney General, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of California; Department of Health Services; Frank G. Vanacore, as the Chief of the Audit Review and Analysis Section of the California Department of Health Services; Diana M. Bonta, Diana M. Bonta, R.N., Dr., P.h.D, as the Director of the California Department of Health Services, Defendants. Chamber of Commerce of the United States; California Chamber of Commerce; Employers Group; California Healthcare Association; California Manufacturers and Technology Assn.; California Association of Health Facilities; California Association of Home & Services for the Aging; Bettec Corporation; Marksherm Corporation; Zilaco Inc., Zilaco; Del Rio Healthcare, Inc.; Beverly Health & Rehabilitation Services, Inc. dba Beverly Manor Costa Mesa; Internext Group, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations; California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO, Intervenors, v. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of California; Department of Health Services; Frank G. Vanacore, as the Chief of the Audit Review and Analysis, Section of the California Department of Health Services; Diana M. Bonta, Diana M. Bonta, R.N., Dr., P.h.D, as the Director of the California Department of Health Services, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 03-55166, 03-55169.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 9, 2006.

Stephen A. Bokat, Esq., National Chamber Litigation Center, Bradley W. Ram-pas, Esq., Washington, DC, Scott W. Oborne, Esq., Jackson Lewis LLP, Mark E. Reagan, Esq., Hooper Lundy & Book-man, Inc., San Francisco, CA, Mark Anthony Johnson, Esq., AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees/Intervenors-Appellants/Interve-nors.

Suzanne M. Ambrose, DAG, AGCA— Office of the California Attorney General, Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA, Richard T. Waldow, DAG, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants/Defendants-Appellants.

Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of the en banc court, the opinion and dissent filed on September 6, 2005, slip op. 12167, and appearing at 422 F.3d 973 (9th Cir.2005), are withdrawn.
No. 76-5559.

#### Cagle *v.*McCune, Warden.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ralph Bartee, Appellant.

[611 NYS2d 607]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), rendered December 17, 1991, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree (2 counts), and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (3 counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the People failed to prove one of the material elements of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree *(see,*Penal Law § 220.09 [13]), and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree *(see,*Penal Law § 220.34 [6]), as charged in this case, i.e., that he had been previously convicted of an offense defined in Penal Law article 220, or the attempt or conspiracy to commit any such offense (CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Bynum,*70 NY2d 858).

In any event, viewing the evidence adduced at trial in a light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it is legally sufficient to establish the required prior conviction. During the trial, the prosecutor offered into evidence a certified copy of the defendant’s 1987 conviction of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree. The record indicates that the court directed that the certified copy of the conviction be marked as People’s exhibit 22 and received it into evidence. Although the court reporter apparently did not record, with a proper notation in the trial transcript, the fact that the exhibit had been received into evidence, the exhibit, which is in the record, was marked in evidence. We find that exhibit 22 was properly admitted into evidence and that it establishes the defendant’s prior conviction beyond a reasonable doubt. Additionally, when the defendant was cross-examined during his testimony at trial, he admitted that the certificate of conviction was truthful and correct.

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review, and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.
# Επίσημη Εφημερίδα C 48/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0901
  doi:10.3000/19770901.C_2013.048.ell |
| --- | --- |
| Επίσημη Εφημερίδα
  της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 48 |
| | |
| Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα | Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες | 56ό έτος19 Φεβρουαρίου 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0901

doi:10.3000/19770901.C_2013.048.ell

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα

της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 48

Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα

Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες

56ό έτος19 Φεβρουαρίου 2013

---

| Ανακοίνωση αριθ | Περιεχόμενα | Σελίδα |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Γνωστοποιήσεις |
| | ΔΙΟΙΚΗΤΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ |
| | Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο |
| 2013/C 048/01 | Απόφαση | 1 |

Ανακοίνωση αριθ

Περιεχόμενα

Σελίδα

V   Γνωστοποιήσεις

ΔΙΟΙΚΗΤΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ

Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο

2013/C 048/01

Απόφαση

1

| EL | |
| --- | --- |

EL

---

V Γνωστοποιήσεις

ΔΙΟΙΚΗΤΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ

Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο

| 19.2.2013 | EL | Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 48/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2013

EL

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 48/1

---

ΑΠΌΦΑΣΗ

2013/C 48/01

Ο ΓΕΝΙΚΟΣ ΓΡΑΜΜΑΤΕΑΣ ΤΟΥ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΟΥ ΚΟΙΝΟΒΟΥΛΙΟΥ,

Έχοντας υπόψη τον κανονισμό (ΕΟΚ, Ευρατόμ, ΕΚΑΧ) αριθ. 259/68 του Συμβουλίου, που τροποποιήθηκε με τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ, Ευρατόμ) αριθ. 723/2004 και, τέλος, με τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ, Ευρατόμ) αριθ. 1080/2010 του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και του Συμβουλίου, της 24ης Νοεμβρίου 2010, που τροποποιεί τον κανονισμό υπηρεσιακής κατάστασης των υπαλλήλων της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης και το καθεστώς που εφαρμόζεται επί του λοιπού προσωπικού της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης, και ιδίως το άρθρο 30 του εν λόγω κανονισμού,

Έχοντας υπόψη την απόφαση του Προεδρείου της 3ης Μαΐου 2004 σχετικά με τη μεταβίβαση εξουσιών της αρμόδιας για τους διορισμούς αρχής (ΑΔΑ) και της αρχής σύναψης συμβάσεων απασχόλησης (ΑΣΣΑ), όπως τροποποιήθηκε τελευταία από το Προεδρείο την 4η Μαΐου 2009,

Έχοντας υπόψη την ημερομηνία εκπνοής, στις 31 Δεκεμβρίου 2012, των ακόλουθων πινάκων επιτυχόντων του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου:

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006, AST/5/08, PE/69/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S, PE/119/S,

Έχοντας υπόψη την γνωμοδότηση της επιτροπής ίσης εκπροσώπησης κατά τη συνεδρίαση της 21ης Νοεμβρίου 2012,

ΑΠΟΦΑΣΙΖΕΙ:

Άρθρο 1

Η διάρκεια της ισχύος των πινάκων επιτυχόντων:

AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, AST/5/08, PE/96/S, PE/110/S, PE/119/S

παρατείνεται μέχρι την 31η Δεκεμβρίου 2013.

Άρθρο 2

Η διάρκεια της ισχύος των πινάκων επιτυχόντων:

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, C/348, AST/1/05, AST/1/06 και PE/69/S

δεν παρατείνεται.

Λουξεμβούργο, 20 Δεκεμβρίου 2012.

Klaus WELLE

Γενικός Γραμματέας

---