alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of GoldSpring, Inc. (the
        "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert T. Faber,
        President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my best
        knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 /s/ robert
        t. faber
 Robert
        T.
        Faber
 *President
        and Chief Executive Officer*
 
 
 Date:
        August 15, 2005
 
 
 16
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1915 

To amend the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 1999 to provide 

clarification regarding the applicability of exemptions relating to the 

transportation of agricultural commodities and farm supplies, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 28, 2011 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. ROBERTS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 

1999 to provide clarification regarding the applicability 

of exemptions relating to the transportation of agricultural commodities and farm supplies, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRANSPORTATION OF AGRICULTURAL COM4 MODITIES AND FARM SUPPLIES. 

5 Section 229(a)(1) of the Motor Carrier Safety Im6 provement Act of 1999 (49 U.S.C. 31136 note) is amend7 ed to read as follows: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1915 IS

1 ‘‘(1) TRANSPORTATION OF AGRICULTURAL COM2 MODITIES AND FARM SUPPLIES.—Regulations pre3 scribed by the Secretary under sections 31136 and 

4 31502 regarding maximum driving and on-duty time 

5 for drivers used by motor carriers shall not apply 

6 during planting and harvest periods, as determined 

7 by each State, to— 

8 ‘‘(A) drivers transporting agricultural com9 modities in the State from the source of the ag10 ricultural commodities to a location within a 

11 100 air-mile radius from the source; 

12 ‘‘(B) drivers transporting farm supplies for 

13 agricultural purposes in the State from a whole14 sale or retail distribution point of the farm sup15 plies to a farm or other location where the farm 

16 supplies are intended to be used within a 100 

17 air-mile radius from the distribution point; or 

18 ‘‘(C) drivers transporting farm supplies for 

19 agricultural purposes in the State from a whole20 sale distribution point of the farm supplies to a 

21 retail distribution point of the farm supplies 

22 within a 100 air-mile radius from the wholesale 

23 distribution point.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

FRANCISCO ROLON, ADMINISTRATOR 

OF THE ESTATE OF MARIA SANCHEZRODRIGUEZ

v.

TRYSTAN H. DAVIES, M.D., LANCASTER 

EMERGENCY ASSOCIATES, LTD., 

MATTHEW C. WIGGINS, M.D., 

LANCASTER RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, 

LTD., JOSEPH F. VOYSTOCK, M.D., 

SURGICAL SPECIALISTS OF 

LANCASTER, P.C. AND LANCASTER 

GENERAL HOSPITAL

PETITION OF: JOSEPH F. VOYSTOCK, 

M.D. AND SURGICAL SPECIALISTS OF 

LANCASTER, P.C.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 282 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of December, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
No. 99-1135.

#### Chappell, in Interest of A. M. K. *v.*Meese et al.

Ct. App. Colo. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2424 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2424

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures containing n-
  butyl-1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one, 1-hydroxypyridine-2-thione, zinc 
                    salt, and application adjuvants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures containing n-
  butyl-1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one, 1-hydroxypyridine-2-thione, zinc 
                    salt, and application adjuvants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES CONTAINING N-BUTYL-1,2-BENZISOTHIAZOLIN-3-ONE, 1-
              HYDROXYPYRIDINE-2-THIONE, ZINC SALT, AND APPLICATION 
              ADJUVANTS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.58 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to mixtures containing n-butyl-
1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one, 1-hydroxypyridine-2-thione, zinc salt, and 
application adjuvants) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09-15-00349-CR

________________

CLIFFORD SANDERS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 305878

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 1, 2015, the Court notified the parties that our jurisdiction 

was not apparent from the notice of appeal and the Court would dismiss the appeal 

for want of jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for 

continuing the appeal. No response has been filed.

The notice of appeal seeks to appeal the regional presiding judge’s denial of 

a motion to recuse. The order is not appealable prior to conviction. See Green v. 

State, 374 S.W.3d 434, 445-46 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012); Apolinar v. State, 820 
2

S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Means v. State, 825 S.W.2d 260, 260-61 

(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, no pet.). Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal for want of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________

 HOLLIS HORTON 

 Justice

 

Submitted on September 29, 2015

Opinion Delivered September 30, 2015

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Case No. 5,629.

#### GORMAN v. MARSTELLER.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 311.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

May Term, 1822.

Tkespass Quake Clausum Fkegit — Different States — Proof of Entry.

1. In trespass quare clausum fregit, the plaintiff must prove a trespass in the county in which the suit is brought.

2. If the close lie partly in Virginia, and partly in the District of Columbia, the injury done in the Virginia part may be given in evidence under the alia enormia.

3. An entry into the District part with intent to do injury in the other part of the close, is unlawful, although without such intent, it would have been lawful.

Trespass quare clausum fregit. The close was called Spring Garden, the greater part of which was in Virginia, and the remainder in the county of Alexandria, in the District of Columbia. The entry upon the District part, was with intent to do an injury in the Virginia part; and without such intent, the entry would not have been a trespass.

THE COURT

(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge,

absent,) at November term, 1821, instructed the jury, 1st. That the plaintiff must prove a trespass in the'county of Alexandria, in the District of Columbia.

2d. (CRANCH, Chief Judge, strongly doubting.) That the injuries done on the Virginia side of the line might be given in evidence under the alia enormia; and

3d. That an entry on the District part of the close, with intent to do the injury on the other part, was a trespass.

See Pope v. Davies, 2 Camp. 266; Bulwer’s Case, 7 Coke, pp. la, 49; Doulson v. Matthews, 4 Term R. 503; Mostyn v. Fabrigas, Cowp. 164; Alves v. Hodgson, 7 Term R. 241.

Verdict for the plaintiff, $100.

A motion for a new trial, upon a suggestion of misdirection of the jury by the court, as to the admission of evidence of injuries done in Virginia under alia enormia, (those injuries being of themselves substantial causes of action in Virginia,) was argued at November term, 1821, by Mr. Mason, for defendant [Samuel A. Marsteller], and Mr. Wise, for plaintiff [John B. Gorman], and continued to May term, 1822, for consideration, when it was argued again before a full court, by Mr. Mason and Mr. Hewitt, for defendant, and Mr. Wise and Mr. Fendall, for plaintiff, when the new trial was refused.

CRANCH, Chief Judge, still doubting.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1164 

To amend the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 to provide for training 

service and delivery innovation projects. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2005 

Ms. CANTWELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 to provide 

for training service and delivery innovation projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRAINING SERVICE AND DELIVERY INNOVA4 TION PROJECTS. 

5 Section 171(b)(1)(D) of the Workforce Investment 

6 Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 2916(b)(1)(D)) is amended to 

7 read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(D) targeted innovation projects that im9 prove access to and delivery of employment and 

10 training services, with emphasis given to 
2 

•S 1164 IS

1 projects that incorporate advanced technologies 

2 to facilitate the connection of individuals to the 

3 information and tools they need to upgrade 

4 skills, including projects that link individuals in 

5 need of training to opportunities for self-guided 

6 learning, and with priority given to projects 

7 that— 

8 ‘‘(i) actively promote sources of infor9 mation about training opportunities and 

10 training content by providing technology 

11 directly to eligible training recipients; 

12 ‘‘(ii) provide for the conduct of online 

13 eligibility determinations for Federal and 

14 State training programs, and direct indi15 viduals to the appropriate programs in the 

16 area; and 

17 ‘‘(iii) integrate high-quality employ18 ment and training services information 

19 with the delivery of information regarding 

20 other social services and health care pro21 grams;’’. 

Æ
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Walter WREN.

No. 60450.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 27, 1977.

In re: Charles B. W. Palmer applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and/or mandamus.

Writs denied.

2
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

Certification of President



I, Ramon Chimelis, President, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Big Sky Industries III, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: February 2, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 147 (Thursday, July 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20121]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3665-000]


Union Electric Company; Notice of Filing

July 25, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 8, 1997, Union Electric Company (UE) filed 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission an application for 
authority to charge market based rates and for certain waivers and 
authorizations. UE requested waiver of notice to permit its proposed 
rate schedule to become effective on July 9, 1997, one day after the 
date of filing.
[FR Doc. 97-20121 Filed 7-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133143 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133143 COA: 274378 Schoolcraft CC: 06-006469-FH CURTIS LEE MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0521 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2007

Clerk
No. 99-696.

#### American Grain Trimmers, Inc., et al. *v.*Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 45388.

#### Protests 853996-G, etc., of Bakon Yeast, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the dried brewers’ yeast in question is the same as that the subject of Abstract 41736, *Ironized Yeast Co.*v. *United States*(T. D. 48570) and *United States*v. *Yick Shew Tong Co.*(25 C. C. P. A. 255, T. D. 49392). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.
**“Take 10” Turnkey Kit**

**Public Service Announcements**

*Public service announcements (PSAs) are free, non-commercial spots on radio, television and the Web designed to alert the community about a program or issue vital to the public interest. Complete Count Committee (CCC) members and elected officials should leverage their local popularity and regional influence and record PSAs. These PSAs can explain the benefits of the 2010 Census and encourage people to take 10 minutes to complete and mail back their forms. Contact station directors at local outlets to discuss stations’ individual PSA recording and airing policies.*

*To help with your efforts, consider using all or part of these sample PSA scripts. Whenever possible, consider customizing the scripts to provide information about your own mail participation rate challenge. These PSAs are designed to air from March 1, 2010, through April 30, 2010.*

**:15 PSA script**

Hi, I’m <<insert name>> and I need you to take 10 minutes to fill out your census form and mail it back. It is important to our community because census data help fund new schools, hospitals and roads and will determine how we are represented at all levels of government. Visit 2010census.gov for more information. 

**:30 PSA script**

Hi, I’m <<insert name>> and I need you to take 10 minutes to fill out your 2010 Census form and mail it back. The short, 10-question form will help determine how more than $400 billion per year in federal funding is distributed to tribal, state and local governments. Census data help shape the future of our community by determining which schools receive funding for improvements, where new hospitals and roads will be built and how we are represented at all levels of government. Remember, take 10 minutes to complete and mail back your form and make a lasting impact on our community. Learn more by visiting 2010census.gov.

**:45 PSA script**

Hi, I’m <<insert name>> and I need you to take 10 minutes to fill out your 2010 Census form and mail it back. The short, 10-question form will help determine how more than $400 billion per year in federal funding is distributed to tribal, state and local governments. Census data help shape the future of our community. The data help determine which schools receive funding for improvements, where new hospitals and roads will be built and how we are represented at all levels of government. Everyone in the United States must be counted, and census workers will visit households that do not return forms to take the count in person. By mailing back the form, you reduce the cost of the census by reducing the number of census workers who must go door-to-door to collect data. Take 10 minutes to fill out and mail back the form. The future of our community depends on it. Learn more by visiting 2010census.gov.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1
  


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8) pertaining to the Wall Data Incorporated Amended and
Restated 1983 Stock Option Plan, Wall Data Incorporated Restated 1993 Stock
Option Plan, Wall Data Incorporated 1993 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee
Directors, Wall Data Incorporated Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and Wall Data
Incorporated 1994 Nonofficer Stock Option Plan of our report dated January 20,
1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
1996.

                                                          /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Seattle, WA
March 27, 1997
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 153 (Friday, August 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42742-42743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20930]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Notice of Proposed Change to the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service's National Handbook of Conservation Practices

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department 
of Agriculture, New York State Office.

ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes in the NRCS National 
Handbook of Conservation Practices, Section IV of the New York State 
NRCS Field Office Technical Guide (FOTG) for review and comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: It is the intention of NRCS to issue a series of new 
conservation practice standards in its National Handbook of 
Conservation Practices. These new standards include: Waste Management 
System (NY312), Roof Runoff Management System (NY558), Manure Field 
Piles (NY193), and Riparian Forest Buffer (NY391).

DATES: Comments will be received until September 8, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquire in writing to Richard D. 
Swenson, State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service 
(NRCS), 441 S. Salina Street, Fifth Floor, Suite 354, Syracuse, New 
York, 13202-2450.
    Copies of these standards are available from the above individual.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agricultural 
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after 
enactment of the law to NRCS State technical Guides used to carry out 
highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law shall be made 
available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days the NRCS 
will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. Following that 
period a determination will be made by the NRCS regarding disposition 
of those comments and a final determination of change will be made.


[[Page 42743]]


    Dated: July 31, 1997.
Richard D. Swenson,
State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 
Syracuse, NY.
[FR Doc. 97-20930 Filed 8-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-M