alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT OLVYKE C HANETTE LANGIE, Pe titioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 13-71283 Age n c y No. A079-535-288 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 17, 2015 * * B e fore : O’ SC ANNLAIN, LEAVY, a n d FER N ANDEZ, C irc uit Judge s. Olvy ke C h ane tte La

ngie , a native and c itiz e n of Indone sia , pe titions for re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny ing he r m o tion to re ope n re m ova l proc e e dings. W e have jurisdic t ion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for a

buse of disc re t ion theB IA’ s de n ia l of a m otion to re ope n, a

nd we 

# FIL ED FEB 25 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).re vie w for substa ntia l e vide nc e the B IA’ s fa c tua l findings. N ajmabadi v. Holde r , 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th C ir. 2010). W e re vie w the B IA’ s findings of fac t for substa ntia l e vide nc e . Id. W e de ny the pe tition for re v ie w. The B IA did not a

buse its disc re tion in deny ing La ngie ’ s m otion to re ope n a s untim e ly

be c a use the m otion wa s file d ove r four y e ars a fte r the B IA’ s fina l de c ision, se e8 C .F.R . § 1003.2(c )(2), and La n gie fa i le d to e sta

blish c ha nge d c irc um s ta nc e s in Indone sia

to qua lify

for an e xc e ption to the

tim e lim ita

tions for a m otion to re o pe n , se e 8 C .F.R . 1003.2(c )(3)(ii). Fina lly , we re

je c t La ngie ’ s c o nte ntion tha

t the B IA’ s ba se s for de nia l we re unc le ar, or tha

t it a pplie d a n inc orre c t le ga l sta

nda rd, a nd/or ina de quate ly

re vie we d the e vide n c e . Se eN

ajmabadi , 597 F.3d a

t 990-91 (B IA a de quate ly c onside re d e vide nc e an d suffic ie ntly

announc e d its de c ision). Thus, we ne e d not a ddre ss Langie ’ s re m a ining c ha l le nge s to theB IA’ s de nia l of the m o tion to re ope n. PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 3 - 7 1 2 8 3 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         7,005
<SECURITIES>                                  12,760
<RECEIVABLES>                                 18,273
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    5,328
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              49,716
<PP&E>                                        21,346
<DEPRECIATION>                                15,307
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                73,575
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9,090
<BONDS>                                          282
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         457
<OTHER-SE>                                    60,101
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  73,575
<SALES>                                       40,356
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              47,738
<CGS>                                          7,264
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 36,637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               161
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               10,940
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           10,940
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  22,915
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.45
        


</TABLE>
|           |   |   | CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS-III LIMITED |
|----------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|           |   |   | PARTNERSHIP                          |
|           |   |   | (Small Business Issuer)              |
|           |   |   |                                 |
|           |   |   | by:                                  | Managing General Partner |
|           |   |   |                                 |   |
|           |   |   |                                 | by: | /s/ William B. Dockser |
|           |   |   |                                 |   | William B. Dockser, |
| March 25, 2010 |   |   |                                 |   | Director, Chairman of the Board, |
| DATE           |   |   |                                 |   |     and Treasurer |
|           |   |   |                                 |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |
|           |   |   |                                 |   |   |
|           |   |   |                                 |   |   |
|           |   |   |                                 |   |   |
| March 25, 2020 |   |   |                                 | by: | /s/ H. William Willoughby |
| DATE           |   |   |                                 |   | H. William Willoughby, |
|           |   |   |                                 |   | Director, President, Secretary, |
|           |   |   |                                 |   | Principal Financial Officer and |
|           |   |   |                                 |   | Principal Accounting Officer |
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 2 (Friday, January 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 439]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Small Business Administration Interest Rates; Notice

    The Small Business Administration publishes an interest rate called 
the optional ``peg'' rate (13 CFR 120.214) on a quarterly basis. This 
rate is a weighted average cost of money to the government for 
maturities similar to the average SBA direct loan. This rate may be 
used as a base rate for guaranteed fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. 
This rate will be 6\5/8\ percent for the January-March quarter of FY 
97.
    Pursuant to 13 CFR 120.932, the maximum legal interest rate for a 
commercial loan which funds any portion of the cost of a project (see 
13 CFR 120.801) shall be 6% over the New York prime rate. The initial 
rate for a fixed rate loan shall be the legal rate for the term or the 
loan.
John. R. Cox,
Associate Administrator for Financial Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-2 Filed 1-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-12-00453-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Z.L.P., A CHILD

From the 77th District Court

Limestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. CPS-235-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Timothy Thomas, has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss his 

appeal in this matter. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Dismissal of this appeal would not 

prevent the parties from seeking relief to which they would otherwise be entitled. The 

motion is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed.

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted; appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed May 9, 2013

[CV06]
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-K of American Spectrum Realty, Inc.;2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting;
 5)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions);
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  May 14, 2008
    By:
    /s/ William J. CardenWilliam J. CardenChief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1140 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1140

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 To designate the State Route 1 Bridge in the State of Delaware as the 
                ``Senator William V. Roth, Jr. Bridge''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF SENATOR WILLIAM V. ROTH, JR. BRIDGE.

    The State Route 1 Bridge over the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal in 
the State of Delaware is designated as the ``Senator William V. Roth, 
Jr. Bridge''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law (including regulations), map, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the bridge described in 
section 1 shall be considered to be a reference to the Senator William 
V. Roth, Jr. Bridge.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42972-42973]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21068]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-150-007]

Richfield Gas Storage System; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

August 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 30, 1997, Richfield Gas Storage System 
(Richfield) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Substitute Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed below to become 
effective August 1, 1997. The modifications to the listed tariff sheets 
are proposed to more accurately reflect the operation of and 
information displayed on Richfield's Electronic Bulletin Board (EBB) as 
of August 1, 1997.

FERC Gas Tariff

Substitute Volume No. 1
First Revised Sheet No. 40
Second Revised Sheet No. 41
First Revised Sheet No. 41A

    Richfield states that copies of this filing are being served on all 
affected customers and applicable state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are

[[Page 42973]]

available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21068 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Minden Bancorp,  Inc. (The "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ended  September  30,  2007 as filed  with the
Securities  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Becky T.
Harrell,  the Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                                  /s/ Becky T. Harrell
                                                  Name: Becky T. Harrell
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 14, 2007

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act has  been  provided  to  Minden  Bancorp,  Inc.  and will be
retained by Minden  Bancorp,  Inc. and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       27
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of The Dewey Electronics Corporation (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John H. D. Dewey, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.





/s/ John H.D. Dewey
-------------------

John H. D. Dewey, Chief Executive Officer
Date:  September 26, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Dewey Electronics Corporation and will be retained by The Dewey
Electronics Corporation and furnished to the Securities and exchange commission
or its staff upon request.



                                       45
# C_2013189EN.01000401.xml

| 29.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/4

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Industrial Tribunals (Northern Ireland) (United Kingdom) made on 12 April 2013 — Valerie Lyttle, Sarah Louise Halliday, Clara Lyttle, Tanya McGerty v Bluebird UK Bidco 2 Limited

(Case C-182/13)

2013/C 189/06

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

Industrial Tribunals (Northern Ireland)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Valerie Lyttle, Sarah Louise Halliday, Clara Lyttle, Tanya McGerty

Applicants:

Defendant: Bluebird UK Bidco 2 Limited

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | In the context of Article 1(1)(a)(ii) of Council Directive 98/59/EC (1), does ‘establishment’ have the same meaning as it has in the context of Article 1(1)(a)(i) of that Directive? |
| --- | --- |

1.

In the context of Article 1(1)(a)(ii) of Council Directive 98/59/EC (1), does ‘establishment’ have the same meaning as it has in the context of Article 1(1)(a)(i) of that Directive?

1

| 2. | If not, can ‘an establishment’, for the purposes of Article 1(1)(a)(ii), be constituted by an organisational sub-unit of an undertaking which consists of or includes more than one local employment unit? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If not, can ‘an establishment’, for the purposes of Article 1(1)(a)(ii), be constituted by an organisational sub-unit of an undertaking which consists of or includes more than one local employment unit?

| 3. | In Article 1(1)(a)(ii) of the Directive, does the phrase ‘at least 20’ refer to the number of dismissals across all of the employer's establishments, or does it instead refer to the number of dismissals per establishment? (In other words, is the reference to ‘20’ a reference to 20 in any particular establishment, or to 20 overall?) |
| --- | --- |

3.

In Article 1(1)(a)(ii) of the Directive, does the phrase ‘at least 20’ refer to the number of dismissals across all of the employer's establishments, or does it instead refer to the number of dismissals per establishment? (In other words, is the reference to ‘20’ a reference to 20 in any particular establishment, or to 20 overall?)

per

---

(1)  Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies

1

OJ L 225, p. 16

---
No. 42170.

#### Protest 955697-G of Luchow Importing Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It appeared that the kegs in which the beer was imported had paper labels pasted thereon which bore the marking “Czecho-Slovakia.” On the authority of Abstract 41288 and the decisions therein cited the protest was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21254]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee Meeting on Training and 
Qualifications

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of the Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Rulemaking 
Advisory Committee to discuss training and qualification issues.

DATES: The meeting will be held on September 11 at 12:00 noon.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Regional Airlines 
Association, Second floor, 1200 19th St. NW., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Regina L. Jones, (202) 267-9822, Office of Rulemaking, (ARM-100) 
800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. II), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee 
(ARAC) to discuss training and qualification issues. This meeting will 
be held September 11, 1997, at 12:00 noon, at the Regional Airline 
Association. The agenda for this meeting will include a status report 
from the Air Carrier Pilot Pre-employment Screening Standards and 
Criteria Working Group.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but may be limited to 
the space available. The public must make arrangements in advance to 
present oral statements at the meeting or may present statements to the 
committee at any time. In addition, sign and oral interpretation can be 
made available at the meeting, as well as an assistive listening 
device, if requested 10 calendar days before the meeting. Arrangements 
may be made by contacting the person listed under the heading FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 6, 1997.
Jean Casciano,
Acting Executive Director, Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 97-21254 Filed 8-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M