alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
l• 

Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- (}pj?J -pi>?!) Directorate Identifier: 

Jf'.rou make changes to rhe 1'({/ues in the table below. you Ill/lSI ensure the totals updote accordingly. {t" 

they do not, click (or Tah) into ond then our ofthe changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Perform an ECI of 

5.0 , ~r' ( I ·L> 011 83 \35. '75.0U 

the airseal 

Cost of HPT T2 0 (I (If' $390,000 <.., (){) i> J() ()(I 0 s (l ()() 

Airseal ' 

IH' (l l() \ () 00 

;j ) ( !() ~ () ()() 

l II ' 1 HI \ (' ()(} 

'· II I 11) ' I) {l(i ..., ll.OO 

\ (!,'II " {) )\) ~ 0.0(1 

~ 'l i)( J \ () I){) \ (). ()(l 

< 

~ (l I){) \ (! 00 \ (). {)(l 

..., 0.00 () 00 \ 0.00 

' 0 (I() \ {) {)() s 0.00 ..., 0 (,(j () {)(l \ (' (J(J 

I) (''I ' ll )() \ () ()() 

' f) ('I) ' 0 I•() \ 0. ()() 

" (l ()I I 0 ){J ..., !) ()( 

\ () lid .;, () (}() " II I 10 

<.., ()Oi, ) () ll i " I I)(J 

n ,I I) \ (,Oil 

1

1 f)1' ' (I f )I) < () I (' 

I ()1 1 ,) ·{ J \ () I )II 

The known number of products in compliance: 0 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $35,275 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: • 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) 

" 0 IH) •, ( i(l 

,. ) (' f)() ..., (I I )(l 

\ () 00 .;, U.IHI 

' () ()(I \ O.tlll 

7 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? ~ 

YES* D NO [gJ 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? -

YES* D NO [gJ 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. ~ 

YES D NO [gJ 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? · 

YES* D NO [gJ 

*Explanation: 

8
No. D-1792.

#### In re Disbarment of Sands.

Henry William Sands, of Los Angeles, Cal., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ATC Healthcare,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ending February 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Savitsky,  Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  hereby certify,  to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


        (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
        material respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of
        the Company.

/S/ DAVID SAVITSKY
------------------
David Savitsky
Chief Executive Officer
May 25, 2007
exv10w2



 





Exhibit 10.2




AMENDMENT No. 1

TO

STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT




     This Amendment No. 1 (“Amendment”) to that Stock Purchase Agreement (the
“Agreement”) entered into as of the 30th day of January, 2007, by and between SEMPRA
ENERGY, a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of California, USA
(“Seller”), and Energy West Incorporated, a corporation incorporated under the laws of the
State of Montana, USA (“Purchaser”), is entered into as of April 11, 2007 by and between
Seller and Purchaser. Any capitalized term used but not defined herein shall have the same meaning
as in the Agreement.



RECITALS




     A. The parties hereto (or their predecessors in interest) have entered into the Agreement.



     B. The parties hereto desire to amend the Agreement by replacing in Section 8.7 thereof the
amount One Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000) with the amount Two Million One
Hundred Thousand Dollars ($2,100,000), all as set forth herein.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein contained and
for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:



AGREEMENT




     1. Maritimes Guarantee. Section 8.7 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting
the words “One Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000)” and inserting in their place the
words “Two Million One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($2,100,000).”



     2. Effect of Amendment. The Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed in all
respects, and all terms, conditions and provisions of the Agreement, except as amended by this
Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.



     3. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of New York, without regards to the principles of conflicts of laws
thereof other than Sections 5-1401 and 5-1402 of the New York General Obligations Law.



     4. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, and
each such counterpart shall for all purposes be deemed an original, and all such counterparts shall
together constitute but one and the same Amendment.



 









 





     5. Effective Date. This Amendment is made effective as of the date hereof.



          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment, or caused this Amendment
to be duly executed by their respective authorized officers, as of the day and year first above
written.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Seller:	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	SEMPRA ENERGY	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	 	/s/ Mark A. Snell	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	Mark A. Snell, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Dated: April 11, 2007	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Purchaser:	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	ENERGY WEST INCORPORATED	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	 	 	/s/ David A. Certozke	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	David A. Cerotzke, President	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Dated: April 11, 2007	 	 






2
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT E


               AMENDMENT 1 TO XYVISION SYSTEM AGREEMENT OF 1/9/97


It is understood by the Parties that Underwriters Laboratories Inc. ("UL") has
a requirement to have an operational system in place to ensure that UL's Year
2000 ("Y2K") Compliancy is assured. It is further mutually understood that
system specifications, priorities and objectives are not yet fully defined. To
ensure that UL's mandatory Y2K objectives are met, the following process will
be followed:
       1. Xyvision project management staff will facilitate a series of
           planning and project mapping activities with the appropriate UL
           staff. The dates and details of this initial process will be defined
           in a Project implementation Schedule.


       2. Upon completion of this initial process, the Parties will mutually
           develop a detailed preliminary implementation Plan defining the
           overall goals and objectives of the EDMS System Implementation
           including incorporation of sites outside of the Northbrook facility.
           A key aspect of this plan will be the definition of critical
           milestone dates for the system implementation, prototyping and
           rollout to users.


       3. The Parties will then work to prioritize and categorize the
           implementation objectives and milestones and develop "time to
           complete" estimates for all activities.


       4. If the full implementation cannot be completed by the mandated Y2K
           compliance deadline, the Parties will determine if additional
           resources can be used to expedite development to meet the identified
           date. If so, Xyvision will use its best efforts to secure or assign
           these additional resources to expedite development. In parallel, or
           if expedited delivery is not feasible, the Parties will work to
           adjust the scope or phasing of deliverables to ensure that core
           functionality can be delivered in the required time frame.


       5. Once defined, this plan will be codified in a Statement of Work. The
           Statement of Work will also identify the key responsibilities of
           each party, critical milestone dates, phased delivery schedules and
           wherever possible, Acceptance Criteria.


       6. The Statement of Work will be signed by both Parties. Any subsequent
           modifications or adjustments to the Statement of Work will also be
           confirmed in writing by both Parties.
<PAGE>   1

                     [RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P. LETTERHEAD]



                      CONSENT OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.


     We consent to the use on the Form 10-K of Sterling Drilling Fund 1983-2 of
our reserve report and all schedules, exhibits, and attachments thereto
incorporated by reference of Form 10-K and to any reference made to us on Form
10-K as a such incorporation.

                                         Very truly yours,


                                         /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.
                                         RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.


Denver, Colorado
March 20, 2000
Translation of Proxy Letter dated March 31, 2006



 Exhibit 10.11 
 Proxy Letter 
 I, Limin Li, (“Grantor”) a citizen of the People’s Republic of China
(“PRC”) with ID No. 440301610103081, am the shareholder of China Digital Mobile Television Co., Ltd. (“CDMTV”) who holds 30% equity interest in CDMTV. I irrevocably authorize
Mr./Ms.                    to exercise the following rights in the term of the letter: 
 Authorize
Mr./Ms.                    (“Grantee” a PRC citizen with ID No.
            ) the right to exercise all my voting rights as a shareholder of CDMTV as provided under its articles of associations, including, but not limited to, voting on the
directors and supervisors. 
 Such grant must be approved by CDTC and Grantee must be an employee of CDTC. If Grantee ceases to be an
employee of CDTC, then Grantor will revoke the proxy and grant a similar proxy to a then-current employee of CDTC designated by CDTC. 
 Grantee shall diligently comply with his/her obligations and prevent Grantor from suffering any loss/damage according to the proxy (excluding the circumstances where Grantor is guilty of intentional wrongdoing or negligence), or will
compensate Grantor for all losses according to the laws. 
 The proxy letter will remain effective for 10 years and become effective on the
date it is executed. 
  

							
		 		 		 	Limin Li
				
		 		 		 	March 31, 2006








 Amendment to Proxy Letter 
  

	To:	Mr./Ms.                    (the representative under the Proxy Letter 2006
enclosed, if appointed) 

 China Digital Technology Consulting (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. 
 I, Limin Li, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) with ID No. 440301610103081, am the shareholder of China Digital Mobile
Television Co., Ltd. (“CDMTV”) who holds 30% equity interest in CDMTV. I executed the enclosed Proxy Letter ( “2006 Proxy Letter”) on March 31, 2006. 
 Mr./Ms.                    (the
representative under the 2006 Proxy Letter enclosed, if appointed, referred to as the “Representative” hereinafter), China Digital Technology Consulting (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. and I agree, after consultation, to extend the term of 2006 Proxy
Letter until February 15, 2032. The commencement shall be on the date 2006 Proxy Letter was executed. 
 Other terms and conditions of
the 2006 Proxy Letter keep valid and unchanged. 
 This Amendment to the Proxy Letter shall be an indivisible part of the 2006 Proxy Letter
and become effective on the date it is executed. 
  

							
		 		 		 	Limin Li
				
		 		 		 	February 15, 2007

  

 1 








 Attachment: 2006 Proxy Letter 
  

 2
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

May 28 , 2015.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00333

- CV

IN RE JOSE GOMEZ AND EDUARDO GOMEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS FORMER REPRESENTATIV ES OF MC CARTY TRUCK WASH & L UBE, INC. , GOMEZ MCCARTY TRUC K WASH & LUBE , I NC. F/K/A MCCARTY TRUCK WASH & LUBE, INC., A ND BROTHERS TIRE SERVICES, INC. D/B/A MCCARTY TRUCK WASH, LUBE & TIRES, Relator s

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 215th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010

- 56104



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On April 14, 2015, relator s Jose Gomez and Eduardo Gomez, Individually and as Former Representatives of McCarty Truck Wash & Lube, Inc., Gomez2

McCarty Truck Wash & Lube Inc. f/k/a McCarty Truck Wash & Lube, Inc., and Brothers Tire Services, Inc. d/b/a McCarty Truck Wash, Lube & Tires filed a petition for writ of m andamus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 ( West 2004); s ee also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator ask this c ourt to compel the Honorable Elaine Palmer, presiding judge of the 215th District Court of Harris County
, to set aside her December 24, 2014 order, granting real parties in
interest’s motion t o strike relators’ affirmative defenses

. On May 19, 2015, relators filed a motion to dismiss this original proceeding because the parties have settled the underlying case. Relators’ requested relief is

now moot. The motion is granted.
Accordingly, relato rs’ petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dismissed. We also lift our stay entered on May 5, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher
, Brown , and Wise.
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Francis A. Newman, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Medical Nutrition
USA, Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

            a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

            b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of this annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

      5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

            a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

            b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 28, 2004


/s/ Francis A. Newman
-----------------------------------
Francis A. Newman
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32
----------



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  First   Litchfield   Financial
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  we, Joseph J. Greco,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company,  and Carroll A. Pereira,  Principal  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Joseph J. Greco                                  /s/ Carroll A. Pereira
-------------------                                  ----------------------
Joseph J. Greco                                      Carroll A. Pereira
President and Chief Executive Officer                Principal Financial Officer
May 12, 2006                                         May 12, 2006


The foregoing  certificate  is furnished  solely for purposes of complying  with
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  and  for  no  other  purpose
whatsoever.  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein or in any
of the Company's  previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  that might incorporate the
Company's  future  filings,  including  this Report on Form 10-Q, in whole or in
part,  this  Certificate  shall not be  incorporated  by reference into any such
filings.


                                       27
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20263]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense


Meeting of the DOD Advisory Group on Electron Devices

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Advisory Group on Electron Devices.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The DoD Advisory Group on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a 
closed session meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held at 0900, Monday, October 6, 1997.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Palisades Institute for Research 
Services, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Eliot Cohen, AGED Secretariat, 
1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal Square Four, Suite 500, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to 
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology, to the Director of Defense Research and Engineering 
(DDR&E), and through DDR&E to the Director, Defense Advanced Research 
Projects Agency and the Military Departments in planning and managing 
an effective and economical research and development program in the 
area of electron devices.
    The AGED meeting will be limited to review of research and 
development program which the Military Departments propose to initiate 
with industry, universities or in their laboratories. The agenda for 
this meeting will include programs on Radiation Hardened Devices, 
Microwave Tubes, Displays and Lasers. The review will include details 
of classified defense programs throughout.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended, 
(5 U.S.C. App. Sec. 10(d) (1994)), it has been determined that this 
Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 
Sec. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly, this meeting will be 
closed to the public.

    Dated: July 25, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate, OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-20263 Filed 7-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
No. 00-6335.

#### Hampton *v.*Madding, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
  4.6  





FIRST AMENDMENT TO
REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT 



        This
First Amendment (“Amendment”), dated February __, 2007, amends that
certain Registration Rights Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of
February 15, 2006 by and between Vein Associates of America, Inc. a Florida corporation
(the “Company”), and ABS-SOS PLUS Partners Ltd., a Cayman Islands
corporation (the “Warrant Holder”). 



        WHEREAS,
in connection with the issuance of a warrant for 2,000,000 common shares of the Company
the parties desire to amend the Agreement; 



        THEREFORE,
for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,
the parties agree as follows: 



        1.       Amendment.
The definition of “Warrants” in Section 1 of the           Agreement shall be
deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:  



        “‘Warrants’means
those certain warrants to purchase 350,000 Shares of Common Stock and to purchase 650,000
Shares of Common Stock issued to the Warrant Holder on February 15, 2006 and that certain
warrant to purchase 2,000,000 Shares of Common Stock issued on ________________________.” 



        2.       Counterparts.
This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of           which shall be deemed
an original but all of which together shall constitute one           and the same
instrument.  



        3.       Full
Force and Effect. Except as expressly provided in this Amendment,           the
Agreement is not otherwise modified and remains in full force and effect.  



        4.       Definitions.
Capitalized terms used, but not defined, in this Amendment           have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.  



[signature page
follows] 









        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed, or caused their duly authorized
representatives to execute, this Amendment. 



		
	 	Vein Associates of America, Inc. 
	

	 	By:___________________________
	 	Name: Eric Luetkemeyer
	 	Title: President
	

	

	 	ABS-SOS PLUS Partners Ltd. 
	 	    By: SIAM Capital Management Ltd. 
	

	 	By: ___________________________
	 	    
    Tamischa Ambrister
	 	    
    Director
No. 00-830.

#### Wirth *v.*College of the Ozarks et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.