alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2





AMTECH SYSTEMS, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Amtech Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bradley C. Anderson, Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By
/s/ Bradley C. AndersonBradley C. AndersonVice President – Finance and Chief Financial OfficerAmtech Systems, Inc.Date: November 15, 2010


78




---
No. 45354.

#### Protests 821394-G, etc., of American Import Co. et al. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel anfl on the authority of *Butler*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303) the merchandise was held dutiable as Rockingham earthenware at 25 percent under paragraph 210.
No. 47794.

#### Protests 545780-G, etc., of International Harvest Hat Co. et al. (St. Louis).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.,

In accordance with stipulation of counsel “8-Bu. paper hats” the same as those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664) were-held dutiable as claimed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMEDICS
INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 28, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                         168,344
<SECURITIES>                                    57,576
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,426
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,851
<INVENTORY>                                     59,905
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               361,576
<PP&E>                                          52,220
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 533,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           79,011
<BONDS>                                        143,464
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,685
<OTHER-SE>                                     212,085
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   533,903
<SALES>                                        148,053
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               148,053
<CGS>                                           75,101
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   75,101
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,811
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   285
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 983
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,659
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,938
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,472
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,472
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71
        



</TABLE>
EX-10.1



 





Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT



TO



RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     This amendment (the “Amendment”) amends, effective as of November 1, 2007, the Restated
Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) entered into as of November 29, 2006 by and between
BioScrip, Inc., formerly MIM Corporation, (the “Company”), and Richard H. Friedman (“Executive”).



     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into the Agreement as of November 29, 2006; and



     WHEREAS, the Agreement provides in subsection 3.7 thereof that any compensation payable by the
Company to the Executive that would not be deductible by the Company as a result of the limitations
of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code shall be deferred to and become payable in the next
subsequent taxable year of the Company in which such compensation would be deductible for Federal
tax purposes by the Company taking into account the limitations of Section 162(m).



     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to amend the Agreement to delete subsection 3.8
thereof;



     NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:




	 	1.	 	The Agreement is hereby amended to delete subsection 3.7 thereof.
	 
	 	2.	 	Except as set forth herein, the terms and provisions of the Agreement shall
remain unmodified and in full force and effect.





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has cause this Amendment to be duly executed and
delivered in its name and on its behalf as of the date and year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	BIOSCRIP, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	/s/ Barry A. Posner	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Barry A. Posner, Executive Vice President
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	/s/ Richard H. Friedman	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Richard H. Friedman
----

EXHIBIT 31.3**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**PURSUANT TO RULE 15d-14(a) (17 CFR 240.15d-14(a))
(AUTHORIZED BY SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, Guangyu Wu, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of theRegistrant, China Recycling Energy Corporation ("China Digital Wireless, Inc."prior to March 8, 2007). 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of thesmall business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for thesmall business issuer and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small businessissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer'sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small businessissuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during thesmall business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer'sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small businessissuer's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer's internal control over financial reporting. 
**SIGNATUREDate: June 12, 2008 /s/ Guangyu WuGuangyu Wu Chief Executive Officer
 ******
No. 45307.

#### Protests 722784-G, etc., of I. Haber, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 43298.

#### Protests 11110-K(A), etc., of H. E. Sullivan & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

On the record presented the protests were overruled.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-2922

___________________________

Juan Carlos Solorzano-Guerrero

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

v.

William P. Barr, Attorney General of United States

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent

 ____________

Petition for Review of an Order of the

 Board of Immigration Appeals

 ____________

 Submitted: March 18, 2020

Filed: March 25, 2020

[Unpublished]

____________

Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Mexican citizen Juan Carlos Solorzano-Guerrero petitions for review of an

order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to remand, in

which he argued that the immigration judge lacked the statutory authority to enter a

2011 order of removal in absentia. After careful review, we conclude that the BIA

did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the motion was untimely and
numerically barred. See Rodriguez de Henriquez v. Barr, 942 F.3d 444, 447 (8th Cir.

2019) (explaining the standard of review); Pinos Gonzalez v. Barr, 929 F.3d 595, 598

(8th Cir. 2019) (noting that a motion for remand is the functional equivalent of a

motion to reopen). We therefore decline to reach the parties’ arguments regarding the

underlying merits of the motion. We further conclude that we lack jurisdiction to

review the BIA’s decision declining to sua sponte rescind, reconsider, or reopen the

proceedings because Solorzano-Guerrero has not raised a colorable constitutional

claim. See Ramos-Portillo v. Barr, 919 F.3d 955, 962-63 (5th Cir. 2019) (concluding

that the petitioner, who sought to rescind his order of removal in absentia and reopen

his proceedings, did not demonstrate a due process violation because he had no

liberty interest in the discretionary reopening of removal proceedings);

Pinos-Gonzalez v. Mukasey, 519 F.3d 436, 441 (8th Cir. 2008) (concluding that an

applicant has no constitutionally protected liberty or property interest in the

discretionary relief of cancellation of removal, and cannot establish a due process

right to obtain that relief). 

Accordingly, the petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________

-2-
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications
NOAA Tech Memo NMFS F/NWC-200: Snake River Chinook Salmon (cont):  Figuure 4. -- Number of spring and summer chinook salmon redds in index areas of the Snake River from 1957 through 1990. Table of Contents
Presidential Documents

40719

Federal Register

Vol. 62, No. 145

Tuesday, July 29, 1997

Title 3—

The President

Proclamation 7013 of July 24, 1997

Death of William J. Brennan, Jr.

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

As a mark of respect for the memory of William J. Brennan, Jr., former

Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, I hereby order,

by the authority vested in me as President of the United States of America

by section 175 of title 36 of the United States Code, that the flag of the

United States shall be flown at half-staff upon all public buildings and

grounds, at all military posts and naval stations, and on all naval vessels

of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia and throughout the

United States and its Territories and possessions until sunset on the day

of interment. I also direct that the flag shall be flown at half-staff for

the same period at all United States embassies, legations, consular offices,

and other facilities abroad, including all military facilities and naval vessels

and stations.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-fourth

day of July, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-seven,

and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred

[FR Doc. 97–20098

Filed 7–28–97; 8:45 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P

and twenty-second.

œ–
Amendment to the Fortune Brands, Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan



 Exhibit 10.10 
 FORTUNE BRANDS, INC. 
 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN 
 Amendment 
 The Plan is amended
by replacing the first sentence of Section 7(a) of the Plan with the following: 
 “In the event of any merger, consolidation, stock
or other non-cash dividend, extraordinary cash dividend, split-up, spin-off, combination or exchange of shares, reorganization or recapitalization or change in capitalization, or any other similar corporate event, the Committee may make such
adjustments in (i) the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan as set forth in Section 6(a) and the number of shares that may be issued to a Non-employee Director with respect to any year as set forth
in Section 4(a), (ii) the kind of shares that may be issued under the Plan and (iii) the amount and kind of payment that may be made in respect of unpaid dividends on shares of Common Stock whose receipt has been deferred pursuant to
Section 4(b), as the Committee shall deem appropriate in the circumstances; provided that, the Committee shall make such adjustments in the event of an equity restructuring (as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123
(revised)) as are necessary to prevent the dilution in value of a Participant’s Award.” 
  

					
		 	FORTUNE BRANDS, INC.
			
	Date: September 25, 2007	 		 	
			
		 	By:	 	 /s/ Mark A. Roche

		 	Its:	 	Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JAVIER MONTES-RUIZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-50398

D.C. No. 3:07-cr-01164-LAB-1

Southern District of California, 

San Diego

ORDER

Before: GOULD and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and LEMELLE, District

Judge.

*

The mandate issued on December 13, 2013, is hereby recalled. 

The unopposed request for publication is granted, and the Memorandum

Disposition filed on November 20, 2013, is withdrawn. The withdrawn

memorandum disposition is replaced and superseded by the attached opinion.

FILED

MAR 21 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * The Honorable Ivan L.R. Lemelle, District Judge for the U.S. District

Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting by designation.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00283

- CV

AMADO QUINTERO

v. JENNIFER A. GARCIA AND JUSTIN R. KENT

On Appeal from the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. C

- 1095

- 20

- D

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, hav ing considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for obse rvance. August 25, 2022
No. 47141.

#### Protest 57825-K of Dan Brechner & Co. (New York).

Opinión by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with agreement of counsel at the hearing the antimony figures in question were held dutiable as claimed at 3 cents per pound, but not less than 22)4 percent nor more than 45 percent ad valorem under the provision for “Articles or wares not specially provided for, if composed wholly or in chief value of lead, but not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or colored with gold lacquer, whether wholly or partly manufactured,” incorporated in said paragraph 397 by virtue of T. D. 49753.
#### Van Oppen & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6591.

Entry No. 725134, etc.

Invoices dated Birmingham, England, September 23, 1941, etc.

Certified September 23, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., November 17, 1941, etc.

(Decided December 10, 1946)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be- rendered accordingly.
Case No. 9,387.

#### MECKLIN v. CALDWELL.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 372.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

*Dec.*Term, 1806.

Bail in Civil Cases — Sufficiency of Affidavit

Assault and battery. Affidavit of the fact, but not of any amount of damage; *held*not sufficient to hold to bail — (nem. con.)

[See Case No. 9.3S8.]
file:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/sanitized%20report/sanitized%20engineering%20reports/p090385.sanitized.eng.txt[5/11/2010 1:13:29 PM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 09-0385

Focus Ready Draft 6/11/2009

ENGINEER: El-Zoobi \ AG

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

OTHER USES: 

MSDS: Label: 

Gen Eqpt: 

ventilation

Respirator: 

TLV/PEL:

CRSS :

S-H20: g/L @

VP: torr @

MW: %<500 %<1000

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns):

Migration to groundwater: 

PBT rating: 

Health: 

Eco: 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: 

1) # of workers exposed: >1000? 

2) >100 workers with >10 mg/day inhalation exposure: 

3) (a) >100 workers w/1-10 mg/day inh. exp. & >100 days/yr: 

 (b) Routine Dermal Cont: >250 workers & >100 days/yr: 
file:///J|/SNURS/SNUR%20Batch%20FY10-3/sanitized%20report/sanitized%20engineering%20reports/p090385.sanitized.eng.txt[5/11/2010 1:13:29 PM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 09-0385

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Days/yr: 

Basis: 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may

coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same

medium.

RELEASE TOTAL

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis:

Inhalation:

Dermal:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ATC Healthcare, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K/A for the year ending February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Savitsky,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and result
                  of operations of the Company.

/S/ DAVID SAVITSKY
--------------------------
David Savitsky
Chief Executive Officer
September 26, 2005

This certification accompanies this amended Report on Form 10-K/A pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

A signed  original  of the  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RIDGEFIELD PERMIAN, LLC AND

ALBERT JEFFRYES GRIFFITHS, AS

TRUSTEE OF THE ALBERT JEFFRYES

GRIFFITHS

TRUST

,

Appellants,

v.

DIAMONDBACK E & P LLC AND

MAGNOLIA, LLC

,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 19

- 00156

- CV

Appeal from the

143rd District Court

of Reeves County, Texas

(TC# 18

- 05

- 22426

- CVR)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below and render judgment in favor of

Appellants.

We further order that Appellants recover from Appellees the ap pellate costs incurred by

Appellants, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 5 TH DAY OF MAY, 2021.

GINA M. PAL AFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
Docket Number FAA-2013-0629
Exhibit 32



ANSWERTHINK, INC



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Answerthink, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), we, Ted A. Fernandez, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and John F. Brennan, Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Ted A. FernandezTed A. Fernandez Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer March 16, 2005/s/ John F. BrennanJohn F. Brennan Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer March 16, 2005




A signed
original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Answerthink, Inc. and will be retained by Answerthink, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 43237.

#### Protest 981487-G of H. Matsuo (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

On the record presented it was found that the merchandise consists of opera glasses similar to those involved in *Woolworth*v. *United States*(2 Cust. Ct. 1, C. D. 74). The claim at 35 percent under paragraph 228 (b) and T. D. 48316 was therefore sustained.