alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amended and Restated 2007 Board of Directors Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
 FiberNet Telecom Group, Inc. 
 Amended and Restated 2007 Board of Directors Compensation Plan 

 (as adopted on and as of August 20, 2007) 
  

	I.	Board of Directors 

  

	 	A.	$16,000 base salary, payable in cash on a quarterly basis in arrears 

  

	 	B.	$1,000 payable in cash for each meeting attended 

  

	 	C.	Additional $500 payable in cash to the Board Chairman for each meeting attended 

  

	II.	Audit Committee 

  

	 	A.	$1,000 payable in cash for each meeting attended 

  

	 	B.	Additional $500 payable in cash to the Committee Chairman for each meeting attended 

  

	 	C.	Additional $10,000 per annum, payable in cash on a quarterly basis in arrears to the Committee Chairman 

  

	III.	Compensation Committee 

  

	 	A.	$1,000 payable in cash for each meeting 

  

	 	B.	Additional $500 payable in cash to the Committee Chairman for each meeting attended 

  

	IV.	Nominating and Governance Committee 

  

	 	A.	$1,000 payable in cash for each meeting attended 

  

	 	B.	Additional $500 payable in cash to the Committee Chairman for each meeting attended 

  

	V.	Per Diem for Special Projects 

  

	 	A.	The Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer of the company may request that a director provide advisory services on a project-specific basis. 

  








	 	B.	Directors will be compensated for undertaking any such services at a rate of $1,000 per day. The company will pro rate the per diem fee as appropriate. For example, if a director
were to take part in a two-hour conference call at the request of the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer, then such director would be compensated with a payment of $250 (i.e., two hours equal 25% of a standard eight-hour day, and
$250 is 25% of $1,000). Compensation for such services will be paid in cash on a monthly basis in arrears. 

  

	 	C.	Directors who sit on the Audit Committee are expressly prohibited from providing such services to the company. Further, independent directors who do not sit on the Audit Committee
may be compensated up to a maximum of $60,000 in connection with providing these services to the company. The company has established the foregoing limitations in order to ensure compliance with the independence requirements under applicable NASD
Marketplace Rules and Securities Exchange Act regulations of the SEC. 

  

	VI.	General 

  

	 	A.	Compensation is payable only to non-employee directors. 

  

	 	B.	Directors may have their reasonable, documented travel expenses reimbursed by the company. 

  

	 	C.	The compensation to be paid under this Plan is payable only with respect to meetings actually held, whether scheduled in advance or otherwise, and does not apply to other actions
taken by directors outside of the context of a meeting (such as the execution of a written consent in lieu of a meeting). Compensation for meetings will be paid in cash on a quarterly basis in arrears.
# C_2012287EN.01002102.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/21

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep (Netherlands), lodged on 2 July 2012 — F. van der Helder, D. Farrington v College voor zorgverzekeringen (Cvz)

(Case C-321/12)

2012/C 287/39

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Centrale Raad van Beroep

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: F. van der Helder, D. Farrington

Appellants:

Respondent: College voor zorgverzekeringen (Cvz)

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Does the phrase ‘legislation [to which] the pensioner has been subject for the longest period of time’ in Article 28(2)(b) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 (1) refer to legislation concerning benefits in respect of sickness and maternity, to legislation concerning cash benefits in respect of old age, or to all legislation concerning the branches of social security mentioned in Article 4 of Regulation No 1408/71 which were applicable pursuant to Title II of that regulation?

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ, English Special Edition 1971 (II), p. 416).

1

---
No. 96-8359 (A-676).

#### Medina *v.*Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 230 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prevent the approval 

of genetically-engineered fish. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 31, 2011 

Mr. BEGICH (for himself, Ms. MURKOWSKI, and Mrs. MURRAY) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

prevent the approval of genetically-engineered fish. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PREVENTING THE APPROVAL OF GENETI4 CALLY-ENGINEERED FISH. 

5 Section 512(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cos6 metic Act (21 U.S.C. 360b(a)) is amended by adding at 

7 the end the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(7) Notwithstanding any other provision of 

9 this section, a genetically-engineered fish shall be 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 230 IS

1 deemed unsafe under this section, including for pur2 poses of section 402(a)(2)(C)(ii).’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
exv10w14



 








Exhibit 10.14




NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION



1.
Cash Compensation



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 		FY 2007		FY 2008 & Beyond
	 
	Member Retainer (Base) -Annual
	 	$	23,000	 	 	$	72,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual Fee in Lieu of Stock Options
	 	$	10,000	 	 	 	N/A	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Chairman Retainer-Annual
	 	$	30,000	 	 	$	30,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Committee Chair Retainer-Audit
	 	$	7,000	 	 	$	10,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Committee Chair Retainer-Governance and ECDC
	 	$	2,000	 	 	$	5,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Standard Board Meeting Fee
	 	$	2,000	 	 	 	N/A	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Committee Meeting Fee
	 	$	1,000	 	 	 	N/A	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Additional Meetings Fee
	 	 	N/A	 	 	$	1,500	 
	(For each Board of Directors or
Committee meeting

attended in excess of six meetings
per fiscal year)
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 






2. Equity-Based Compensation



Pre-FY 2008: Restricted Stock Grant under 1993 Plan



Restricted stock grant valued at $18,000 made every three years, including on September 1, 2005,
based on the last reported sale price of Company stock on the preceding trading day, and in
accordance with the 1993 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan. A non-employee director may
sell or otherwise transfer one-third of the shares covered by an award on each anniversary of the
date of the award. If a non-employee director ceases to be a director before the restrictions
against transfer have lapsed with respect to any shares, then except for death, disability or
retirement, the director forfeits such shares. The restrictions lapse upon a change in control.




FY 2008 & Beyond: Restricted Stock Grant under 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan



Restricted stock grant valued at $20,000 made on January 1 of each year, commencing on January 1,
2008, based on the last reported sale price of Company stock on the preceding trading day, in
accordance with the 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Restrictions lapse on the first anniversary
date of the award. Awards shall be made in accordance with other terms and forms approved by the
Executive Compensation and Development Committee.
USGSHomeContactUSGSSearchUSGS

Data Series 416
Before the Third Division,

February 11, 1941

No. 45386.

#### Protests 606064-G, etc., of Rohner Gehrig & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 00-822.

#### Kremen *v.*Maine.

Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Income Properties, Ltd. III 1995 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000720460
<NAME> ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES LTD III
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,887,586
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,374
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,494
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      13,992,391
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,929,539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,305,766
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      3,447,327
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,174,625)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,305,766
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,612,439
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,840,883
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             412,569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                224,184
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            224,184
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   224,184
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>The Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
UN I TE D ST AT ES D I STRI CT C OU RT F O R T H E D IS T R IC T O F C O LU M B IA

____________________________________ ) GREGORY W. HORTON, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Ci vi l A cti onNo. 08 -05 48 (P L F) ) U.S. PAROL E COMMI SSI ON, ) ) Re sp on de nt. ) ____________________________________)

ORDER F or the re a so ns state d in

the a c c omp anyingMe mor and um O pin ion , it

is ORDE RED that th e Or de r t o s ho w c a us e [Dk t. N o. 15 ] is D I SCH AR GE D; it i s FURTHE R ORDERED that the Petition for a Writ of Ha be as Cor pu s [Dkt. No. 1] is DENI ED ; and

it i s F UR TH ER O RD ERE D that th is c a se is D I SMI SSED . T his is a fi na l a pp e a la ble Orde r. See Rul e 4( a ), F e d. R. A pp . P. SO ORDERED. /s/________________________ PAULL . FRI EDMAN DATE: September

21, 2009 United States District J udg e
**EXHIBIT
      3.3**




**BYLAW
      AMENDMENT**




Section
      2 of Article III of the Corporation’s Code of By-Laws





**Section
      2.***Annual Meeting*.  The annual meeting of
      the Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) shall be held each year at 9:00 A.M. on
      the third Wednesday in May (or, if such day is a legal holiday, on the next
      succeeding day not a legal holiday), for the purpose of electing directors
      of
      the Corporation (“Directors”) and for the transaction of such other business as
      may legally come before the Annual Meeting.  If for any reason the
      Annual Meeting shall not be held at the date and time herein provided, the
      same
      may be held at such time, date and place as determined by the board of directors
      or the business to be transacted at such Annual Meeting may be transacted at
      any
      special meeting of the Shareholders (a “Special Meeting”) called for that
      purpose.
Certification
      Pursuant to


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


(as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906


of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
      connection with the amended quarterly report Royal Spring Water Inc. (the
“Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
      the undersigned of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
      to
      the best of their knowledge:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written certification has been provided to the Company and
      will
      be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
                Alex HazanName:
                Alex HazanTitle:
                Chief Executive OfficerAugust
                16, 2007/s/
                Harel GoldsteinName:
                Harel GoldsteinTitle:
                Chief Financial OfficerAugust
                16, 2007





This
      Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This exhibit is not “filed” for purposes of Section
      18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as provided
      by applicable rules of the Securities Exchange Commission.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2220 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2220

                     For the relief of Momo Krcic.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 21, 2012

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                     For the relief of Momo Krcic.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MOMO KRCIC.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Momo Krcic 
shall be eligible for an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to 
that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing 
an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of 
that Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for adjustment of status to lawful 
permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Momo Krcic enters the United States 
before the filing deadline set forth in subsection (c), Momo Krcic 
shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully in the United 
States and shall be eligible for adjustment to lawful permanent 
resident status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) and (b) shall 
apply only if the application for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status are filed with appropriate fees not later than 2 
years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon granting immigrant 
visas or lawful permanent resident status to Momo Krcic, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by one, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of birth of 
Momo Krcic under section 202(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(a)(2)).
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hopeton Johnson, Appellant.

[612 NYS2d 171]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.), rendered December 23, 1991, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that he was absent from a material stage of his trial. At the beginning of the defendant’s pretrial *Sandoval*hearing, there was some confusion as to whether one of the defendant’s prior convictions was a Family Court matter or a criminal prosecution. Concerned that the defense counsel and the prosecutor might not be reading from the same documents, the court inquired “[d]o we have the same [nysiid] sheet”, whereupon the court directed the attorneys to “[a]pproach [for] a second”. A brief discussion took place at the bench after which the court concluded that the matter in question was not a Family Court *570matter, and the defense counsel expressly agreed. Thereafter, the defense counsel continued her arguments in open court, in the defendants’ presence, as to why the People should not be permitted to inquire into the defendants’ past convictions.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the record clearly demonstrates that the *Sandoval*hearing took place in open court, in his presence, consistent with his right to be present at this material stage of the trial *(see, People v Michalek, 82*NY2d 906; *People v Favor, 82*NY2d 254; *People v Dokes,*79 NY2d 256). What took place at the bench was merely a brief conference on a ministerial matter, namely, ascertaining whether the court and counsel were all reading from the same nysiid sheets. While it is unlikely that this conference, during this nonjury proceeding, was conducted in hushed voices inaudible to the defendant, even assuming that he was not able to hear the discussion at the bench, it cannot be said that his absence from this discussion deprived him of any opportunity for meaningful factual input *(see, People v Smith, 82*NY2d 254, 268; *People v Gordon,*200 AD2d 634; *see also, People v Walker,*202 AD2d 312; *cf., People v Dokes, supra).*

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Miller, J. P., Joy, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
From: Jordan, Ronald 

Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 7:42 AM 

To: Aldridge, Elizabeth 

Cc: dbhill@southernco.com; Hall, Jessica; Alicea, Jezebele; Flanders, Phillip 

Subject: Questions regarding UWAG comments on Steam Electric ELGs 

Good morning Liz,

Upon reviewing the comments UWAG submitted on the proposed effluent guidelines for the steam

electric power generating point source category, we’ve concluded that additional information is needed

to help us evaluate your comments with respect to fly ash and bottom ash.  Please see the attached

letter for details.

I hope all is well and you’ve been able to take some time off to enjoy the holidays.

Regards,

Ron

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  

Ron Jordan

USEPA Office of Water

Engineering and Analysis D vcivision

(202) 566‐1003

Attached: 

UWAG questions_Dec 30 2013.pdf
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****ConservingAmericas wetlands**** 
SuDocNumber:PREX14.2:C 76/3/
ItemNumber:0856-E(online)
CGPsystem Number:000672042
 
2005
2006
2007
2008
 
 
 
 **
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference to the Registration Statement on
      Form
      S-8 of Third Century Bancorp ( the “**Company**”),
      File Number
      333-118604, our report dated March 28, 2007 on the consolidated financial
      statements of the Company as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the two
      years
      then ended, which report is incorporated by reference in the Company’s 2006
      Annual
      Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed pursuant
      to
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.




/s/
      BKD
      LLP


Indianapolis,
      Indiana


March
      28,
      2007
No. 00-748.

#### Dawson *v.*Terhune, Director, California Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
#### Norman M. Morris et al. *v.*United States

No. 7921.

Entry No. 711059, etc.

(Decided December 12, 1950)

Lane, *Young & Fox (William H. Fox*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the merchandise the subject of these appeals are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Gothic Watch Go.,*23 Cust. Ct. 235, Reap. Dec. 7712, affirming the judgment in *Gothic Watch Co.*v. *United States,*19 Cust. Ct. 309, Reap. Dec. 7438, and that the record in Reap. Dec. 7712, *supra,*may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts, I find that the attempted appraisement embodied in the second return of value by the appraiser of the merchandise covered by each of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the annexed schedule, which is marked *“A”*and made a part of this decision, was illegal, null, and void, and that the appraiser’s original return of value in each case, as reported by him to the collector of customs, constituted his appraisal of the merchandise pursuant to section 500 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1500), and was final and .conclusive in the absence of any appeal pursuant to section 501 of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1501).

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 00-903.

#### Blitch *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 47770.

#### Protests 52863-K, etc., of Balfour, Guthrie & Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise in question is the same as that passed upon in *Pacific Trading Co.*v. *United States*(8 Cust. Ct. 221, C. D. 610) the claim under paragraph 1558 was sustained.