alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 149 (Monday, August 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20420]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT97-57-000]


Columbia Gulf Transmission Company; Notice of Refund Report

July 29, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 24, 1997, Columbia Gulf Transmission 
Company (Columbia Gulf) tendered for filing with the Commission its 
Refund Report made to comply with the Docket No. RP97-149.
    Columbia Gulf states that it has credited refunds received from Gas 
Research Institute (GRI) in the above referenced docket to eligible 
firm customers on a pro rata basis. Columbia Gulf states that it made 
these refunds ($116,055.27) in the form of credits to invoices issued 
on or around May 10, 1997, which were payable to Columbia on or before 
June 10, 1997.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed on 
or before August 5, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20420 Filed 8-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
_PJ _ 

# OAR Box 

# 1865 Prepped byCharmelle Mathews

Document

Number: 

# 48 ) IV-E-3 6 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 12/3/20089:15:29AM

Sheet 48of 105P. 2 

# A-83-2 7 CORPORATIO N IV-E-3 6

TELEPHON E CAL L REPOR T - INDUSTRIAL BOILE RS0 2 NSP S DATE : Apri l 9 , 198 7 TO : Mr . Car l Buzzut o

C- E Lurg i 100 0 Prospec t Hil l Road Windsor , C T 0609 5 (203 ) 688-191 1 FROM : J . Thoma s Waddel l SUBJECT : FB C uni t a t lon e Energy , lone , CA Mr . Buzzut o provide dth e followin ginformation : o 1 FB C unit ; 146,00 0 pph o starte dupi nJanuar y 198 7 o circulatin g be d o burn s lignite ; 1.2 % sulfu r o subjec t t o Stat e emmission s limi t o f 0.26 1 l bS0 2 /MMBt u o desig nCa/ S rati o i s abou t ••1T5- \ /.7t >

Progres s Center/320 0 E . Chape l Hil l Rd./Nelso n Hwy./P.O . Bo x13000/Researc h Triangl e Park . N.C . 27709/(919)541-910 0
Exhibit 32.1

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                            SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  each of the  undersigned  officers  of Ronson
Corporation (the "Company"), certifies that:

       (1)    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
              period ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the
              requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
              Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78 m or 78 o(d)); and

       (2)    the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
              operations of the Company.




Dated:  May 15, 2006            /s/Louis V. Aronson II
                                -------------------------------------
                                Louis V. Aronson II
                                President and Chief Executive Officer




Dated:  May 15, 2006            /s/Daryl K. Holcomb
                                -------------------------------------
                                Daryl K. Holcomb
                                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


       This  certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.


                                       23
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41429]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20344]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[NAFTA--01482 and 01482B]


Singer Furniture Company; Lenoir and Roanoke, Virginia; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for NAFTA Transitional 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter 2, Title II, of the 
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 USC 2273), the Department of Labor 
issued a Certification for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance on 
April 17, 1997, applicable to all workers of Singer Furniture Company, 
Lenoir and Chocowinity, North Carolina. The notice was published in the 
Federal Register on May 9, 1997 (62 FR 25660).
    At the request of the petitioners, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New findings show that 
worker separations occurred during the past year at Singer Furniture 
Company, Roanoke, Virginia. The workers are engaged in employment 
related to the production of household furniture.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to cover 
workers at the subject firms' Roanoke, Virginia location. Also, the 
impact date is being changed from February 19, 1996 to February 4, 
1996.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Singer Furniture Company adversely affected by imports from 
Mexico.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA--01482 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Singer Furniture Company, Lenoir, North Carolina 
(NAFTA--01482) and Roanoke, Virginia (NAFTA--01482B) who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after February 
4, 1996 are eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 18th day of July 1997.
Curtis K. Kooser,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-20344 Filed 7-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit 32.1


          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of East Penn Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Brent L. Peters,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      o     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      o     To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
            presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial
            condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
            and for the periods presented in the Report.




  /s/ Brent L. Peters
------------------------------------------------------
Brent L. Peters, President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated:   March 27, 2006
Attachment 1

JEA Northside Plant Process Flow Diagrams



Attachment 2

JEA Northside DSS Material Flow Diagram
JEA Northside DSS Material Flow Diagram

Fly Ash

Bed Ash

Dense Ash Slurry

Fly Ash Silo

Silo #1

Fly Ash Silo

Silo #2

PreMix

PreMix

Fly Ash 

Slurry 

Mixing Tank

Bed Ash Silo

Silo #3

Bed Ash Silo

Silo #4

Dense Ash 

Slurry 

Mixing Tank

Dense Ash 

Slurry 

Mixing Tank

By-Product

Storage Area 

By-Product

Storage Area

Head 

Circulation 

Pump

Feeder 

Pumps

PreMix

Pre-Mix

Feeder 

Pumps

Feeder 

Pumps

Feeder 

Pumps

Booster

Pump

Booster

Pump

Booster

Pump

Booster

Pump

GEHO 

Pump

GEHO 

Pump

Fly Ash 

Slurry 

Mixing Tank Head 

Circulation 

Pump

Head 

Circulation 

Pump

Head 

Circulation 

Pump

Feeder Pumps represent the dense ash slurry tank feeder pumps.

GEHO Pumps represent the GEHO piston diaphragm pumps.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 149 (Monday, August 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41973]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20512]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[NM-070-1320-01; NM-8128; NM-8130; NM-11670]


Notice of Coal Action, New Mexico

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability, Record of Decision (ROD) for the 
Thermal Energy Preference Right Lease Applications (PRLA's) San Juan 
County, New Mexico.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The PRLA process requires that ROD be made available to the 
public. The ROD is the document announcing the BLM's decision regarding 
PRLA commercial quantities determinations. This action establishes the 
availability of the ROD for Thermal Energy's PRLA's.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the ROD can be obtained at the New Mexico State 
Office, Bureau of Land Management, P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, New Mexico 
87502-0115.

    Dated: July 25, 1997.
Richard A. Whitley,
Acting State Director.
[FR Doc. 97-20512 Filed 8-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1140 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2005 

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

AN ACT 

To designate the State Route 1 Bridge in the State of 

Delaware as the ‘‘Senator William V. Roth, Jr. Bridge’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

S 1140 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF SENATOR WILLIAM V. ROTH, 

2 JR. BRIDGE. 

3 The State Route 1 Bridge over the Chesapeake and 

4 Delaware Canal in the State of Delaware is designated 

5 as the ‘‘Senator William V. Roth, Jr. Bridge’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law (including regulations), map, 

8 document, paper, or other record of the United States to 

9 the bridge described in section 1 shall be considered to 

10 be a reference to the Senator William V. Roth, Jr. Bridge. 

Passed the Senate June 15, 2005. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6199** 

JOHN RUTHERFORD , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CORPORAL DALE ANDERS; SERGEANT MELINDA HANEY, a/k/a Sergeant Belinda; PFC DAVID EAVES , Defendants

– Appellees, and UNION COUNTY JAIL; ROBERT HINES, Administrator; D. HANEY, Assistant Administrator; OFFICER DELL MITCHELL, a/k/a Officer Dell , Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 2:11

- cv - 03139

- DCN )

Submitted : April 23, 2015 Decided: April 28, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 John Rutherford , Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr. , CHAPMAN, HARTER & HARTER, PA , Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: John Rutherford appeals the district court’s final judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Appellees in hi s civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). The record does not contain a transcript of the trial proceedings. An appellant has the burden of including in the record on appeal a transcript of all parts of the proceedings material to the issues raised on appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 10(b); 4th Cir. R. 10(c). An appellant proceeding on appeal in forma pauperis is entitled to transcripts at government expense only in certain circumstances. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (2012). By failing to produce a transcript or to qualify for the production of a transcript at government expense, Rutherford has waived review of the issues on appeal that depend upon the transcript to show error. Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2); Keller v. Prince George’s Cnty. , 827 F.2d 952, 954 n.1 (4th Cir. 1987). As the record before us reveals that Rutherford did not pursue any post

- verdict motions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Proc edure 50(b) or Rule 59, he may not challenge the sufficiency of evidence supporting the jury’s verdict. Belk, Inc. v. Meyer Corp., U.S. , 679 F.3d 146, 154 (4th Cir. 2012). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment and deny his pending motion t o appoint counsel . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately4 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Fred WOMACK v. DAY SANITARY SERVICE, INC.

No. 59760.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 1977.

In re: Fred Womack applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, 343 So.2d 231, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Not considered. Not timely filed.

TATE, J.,

concurring.

The U. S. postmark shows that the application was mailed on the day following expiration of the delay.
Exhibit 10.14(b)


 Schedule of Secured Convertible Notes (new financings on November 15, 2005 and
 December 7, 2005) issued by NCT Group, Inc. to Carole Salkind and outstanding
                             as of December 7, 2005



                                                                 Conversion
    Issue Date           Due Date             Principal           Price (a)
    ----------           --------             ---------           ---------
     11/15/05            05/15/06           $   300,000            $0.0100
     12/07/05            06/07/06               300,000            $0.0100


                                           -----------------
                                               $600,000
                                           =================


(a)  Note  conversion  price will be the  greater  of: (i) the lowest  last sale
     price of NCT's common stock  during the  five-day  period  comprised of the
     date ofhe note, date preceding and three dates  following;  or (ii) the par
     value of NCT's common stock on the date the conversion  notice is delivered
     to NCT.
#### KING v. CLENDAMEL.

December 18, 1837.

*Rule to show cause why nonsuit should not he taken off.*

The court will exercise a discretion in taking off a nonsuit, on the case being called for trial, where the plaintiff, before trial, has received the amount *169of the debt from the defendant, and the plaintiff was unaware of the effect that his receipt might produce upon the question of costs, if the application is made by the defendant without *laches.*

In this case, the plaintiff, after the cause had been on the trial list, received from the defendant the amount of his debt, and gave a receipt in full. The case was called for trial, and the plaintiff was called, and not appearing, a nonsuit was entered. Upon affidavit presented, showing that the party plaintiff, supposed that the receipt of tiie debt would not subject him to costs, the court granted a rule on the plaintiff to show cause why the nonsuit should not be taken off

*C. lager soil,*for plaintiff,

cited 3 *E. C. L. R.*5; 1 *Holt's Rep.;*27 *E. C. L. R.*310.

Per Curíam.—

The rule in this case is made absolute. A judgment of nonsuit, where the plaintiff is called to trial and does not answer, is essentially a judgment by default. The defendant, by payment of the amount claimed before trial, admits the plaintiff’s cause of action, and the plaintiff’s receipt of the debt, accompanied by proof of his want of knowledge as to the effect it might produce as to the costs, presents a case for the equitable interference of the court, which will be exercised in all cases under the common law jurisdiction and discretion of the court, there being no prohibitory provisions of our acts of assembly, and where the application is seasonable, that is to say without unreasonable delay.

Rule absolute.
EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<PAGE>

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

         Subsidiary                      Ownership        State of Incorporation
         ----------                      ---------        ----------------------

Flatbush Federal Savings and Loan          100%                   Federal
   Association
EXHIBIT 3.1.5




                           CERTIFICATION OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                         ELECTRONIC CLEARING HOUSE, INC.


ELECTRONIC CLEARING HOUSE, INC., a corporation organized under the laws of the
State of Nevada, by its President and Corporate Secretary does hereby certify:

1. That the board of directors of said corporation at a meeting duly convened
and held on the 18th day of November, 1996, passed a resolution declaring that
the following change and amendment in the Articles of Incorporation is
advisable:

RESOLVED, that Article "Fourth" of the Company's Articles of Incorporation be
amended to read as follows:

"FOURTH: The amount of the total authorized capital stock of the Corporation is
Three Hundred Ten Thousand Dollars ($310,000), which shall consist of Twenty-Six
Million (26,000,000) shares of Common stock of the par value of One Cent ($.01)
each and five million (5,000,000) shares of Preferred stock having a par value
of One Cent ($.01) each."

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said ELECTRONIC CLEARING HOUSE, INC., has caused this
certificate to be signed by its President and its Corporate Secretary and its
corporate seal to be hereto affixed this 10th day of March, 1997.

ELECTRONIC CLEARING HOUSE, INC.

Donald R. Anderson, President
Donna L. Camras, Corporate Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   4-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                          57,490
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,534
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,519
<INVENTORY>                                        952
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,524
<PP&E>                                          34,284
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,619
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,205
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,047
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        58,882
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,886
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,205
<SALES>                                         39,106
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,106
<CGS>                                            9,433
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,882
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,531)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       117
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,648)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,648)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.47)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 152 (Thursday, August 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20862]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting of the National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis 
Panel:

    Agenda/Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: August 14, 1997.
    Time: 11 a.m.
    Place: Parklawn, Room 9-101, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857.
    Contact Person: Maureen L. Eister, Parklawn, Room 9-101, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301, 443-3936.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to 
the meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations 
imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers 93.242, 
93.281, 93.282)

    Dated: July 31, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 97-20862 Filed 8-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2013108EN.01001602.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 29 January 2013 — Martin Grund v Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein

(Case C-47/13)

2013/C 108/34

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Martin Grund

Applicant:

Defendant: Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein

Defendant:

Interested party: Vertreter des Bundesinteresses beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Interested party:

Question referred

Question referred

Is agricultural land permanent pasture within the meaning of Article 2(2) of the regulation (1) if used currently and for at least five years for the cultivation of grass or other herbaceous forage but during this period the area has been ploughed and instead of the previous herbaceous forage (in this case clover) another herbaceous forage (in this case field grass) sown, or do such cases constitute a crop rotation precluding the creation of permanent pasture?

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 of 21 April 2004 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of cross-compliance, modulation and the integrated administration and control system provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers (OJ 2004 L 141, p. 18).

1

---