alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1143 

To provide death and disability benefits for aerial firefighters who work 

on a contract basis for a public agency and suffer death or disability 

in the line of duty, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2005 

Mr. ENZI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide death and disability benefits for aerial firefighters 

who work on a contract basis for a public agency and 

suffer death or disability in the line of duty, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Aerial Firefighter Re5 lief Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 
2 

•S 1143 IS

1 (1) Pilots and crew members of aircraft used to 

2 fight wildfires generally work on a contract basis 

3 with a State or Federal agency and, as a result, are 

4 not eligible for death or disability benefits should 

5 they be killed or injured in the line of duty. 

6 (2) Employer death benefits and life insurance 

7 for aerial firefighters are expensive, and a family of 

8 an aerial firefighter who dies in the line of duty has 

9 to cope not only with the loss of a loved one, but 

10 also the additional financial loss of a wage earner. 

11 (3) It is vital that Congress continue to encour12 age the recruitment and retention of skilled and ex13 perienced aerial firefighters. 

14 SEC. 3. ELIGIBILITY OF AERIAL FIREFIGHTERS FOR PUB15 LIC SAFETY OFFICER DEATH BENEFITS. 

16 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1204(8) of the Omnibus 

17 Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 

18 3796b(8)) is amended— 

19 (1) in subparagraph (B) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

20 end; 

21 (2) in subparagraph (C) by striking the period 

22 at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

23 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub24 paragraph: 
3 

•S 1143 IS

1 ‘‘(D) an individual serving a public agency, 

2 or a contractor or subcontractor at any tier of 

3 a public agency, in an official capacity, with or 

4 without compensation, as a pilot or a crew 

5 member of an aircraft carrying out a fire6 fighting mission on behalf of such public agen7 cy, if the injury involved occurs during the pe8 riod beginning with the moment in which the 

9 aircraft first moves under its own power for the 

10 purpose of flight and ending with the moment 

11 in which the aircraft comes to rest after land12 ing.’’. 

13 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by sub14 section (a) shall apply with respect to injuries occurring 

15 on or after September 29, 1976. 

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rapid Bio Tests Corporation a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Paul R. Hemmes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                  (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Rapid Bio Tests Corporation, and will be retained by Rapid Bio Tests
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.



/s/ Paul R. Hemmes
--------------------------
Paul R. Hemmes
Chief Financial Officer
January 14, 2004
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Minden Bancorp,  Inc. (The "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the  Securities
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Becky T. Harrell, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                                /s/ Becky T. Harrell
                                                Name: Becky T. Harrell
                                                Title:  Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 14, 2006

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act has  been  provided  to  Minden  Bancorp,  Inc.  and will be
retained by Minden  Bancorp,  Inc. and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



                                       27
No. 99-1122.

#### Soto-Rivera *v.*Santiago-Guadarrama, School Superintendent, Rio Piedras I District, et al.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
**“Take 10” Turnkey Kit**

**Sample Press Release: Challenge Winner**

*For distribution on May 3, 2010.*

**<<Insert Name of Community>> Wins 2010 Census**

**Mail Participation Rate Challenge**

*<<Insert name of community>> to Receive <<name prize>> after Accomplishing a Mail Participation Rate of XX Percent*

With a mail participation rate of XX percent which was XX percentage points higher than the Census 2000 rate, <<insert name of community>> has won its mail participation rate challenge. <<insert details about the challenge and prizes>>.

“I’d like to congratulate and thank all the people of <<insert community>> for completing and mailing back their census forms and ensuring our community is accurately counted,” said <<insert name and title>>. “For those of you who were not able to return a form, you can still be counted. Please work with the census workers who will be visiting you shortly to take the count in person.” 

Beginning this month, census workers will visit in person every residence that did not mail back a completed census form. Census workers will also re-visit every address that was previously classified as vacant or as non-existent to ensure that classification was correct and to take the count in person if the address was misclassified. To count the more transient populations, census workers will visit service-based locations, such as soup kitchens and shelters. Census workers can be identified by a census bag and badge.

For more information visit 2010census.gov.

-X-
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 2, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00569

- CR

Richard Alexander VALLEJO

,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District C ourt

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CR10924

Honorable Melisa C. Skinner , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The trial court sentenced the defenda nt on August 26, 2022, and the reporter’s record was

due on October 25, 2022. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.1.

After the due date, court reporter Mary Beth Sasala filed a notification of late record. In
it, she requested a sixty

- day extension of time to file the record.

The reporter’s request is GRANTED IN PART. See id. R. 35.3(c) (limiting an extension in a regular appeal to thirty days). The reporter’s record is due on November 28, 2022. See id.

If the reporter’s record is not filed with this court by No vember 28, 2022, any further requests for additional time to file the record must be accompanied by a signed, written status report. The report must describe the transcript by day with the date, description, page counts, and remarks for each day. The pag e counts must include the total number of pages, the number of pages edited, proofread, and formatted into the required electronic form (including bookmarks). The report may describe any unusual aspects of the record. The report must describe any problem s the court reporter reasonably believes may delay the completion of the record beyond the extended date. A preferred form for the status report, with an accompanying example, is attached

.

_________________________________ Pat ricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of November, 2022

.

______________________________ _____ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
**Exhibit
      23.0**





Consent
      of Wolf & Company, PC
















**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
      333-135692 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 8, 2007 relating to the
      consolidated financial statements of Newport Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary as
      of
      December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for each of the years in the three-year period
      ended December 31, 2006 appearing in this Annual Report on Form
      10-K.








/s/
      Wolf
& Company, PC


Boston,
      Massachusetts


March
      23,
      2007
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 **CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of Metabolix, Inc. (the “Company”) forthe quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Richard P. Eno, President,Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company andJoseph D. Hill, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to ourknowledge that:

 

1.            The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.            The informationin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

This certification is beingprovided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of theReport, nor is it to be deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.

 
| Dated: August 11, 2008 | /s/   RICHARD P.  ENO               |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                        | * *                                      |
|                        | *President and Chief Executive  Officer*      |
|                        | *(Principal Executive Officer)*               |
|                        |                                          |
| Dated: August 11, 2008 | /s/   JOSEPH D.  HILL               |
|                        | * *                                      |
|                        | *Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer* |
|                        | *(Principal Financial Officer)*               |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying  with 18 U.S.C.  1350,  I, the  undersigned
Chief Financial Officer of Medical  Nutrition USA, Inc. (the "Company"),  hereby
certify,  to the best of my knowledge,  that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
the  Company for the fiscal year ended  January 31, 2007 ( the  "Report")  fully
complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934,  as amended,  and that the  information  contained in the Report fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the Company.

         May 16, 2007                         /s/ Alan Levy
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Alan Levy
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              (Principal Accounting and
                                              Financial Officer)

                                      F-27
Benton Lake Wetland Management District AO09
q Northcentral Montana
"| sa
a9 > . |
7 [a , ed |
nC: a Ea Ne
e ado ¢ :
—— J a 7 ;
| N7NRE 4 TSANRSE paay cone T37NROE
1 E a U4
ai i 2 = A | .
1 . rh
oe! olen .
| = re ae
| | 5 "Ee (d s 2
3 .
reo L .
| Bearh Den 5
"| U I = Bal
T36NR6 7 T 3 a 2 z3eymen—| * ROE
| ‘cal 2)
s T 3 T
ly ry 4 |.
| feed
i LSwmaa Ei : ‘
i , TJ q =
3 %,
: | | i
il see ee
> 73 Fa6HRFE T35NR8I H +3
| H
H
H » MJ Ries Es
H 3
| 3 f
H y id + J
8 H X
i Hill ;
2 smith 7
H iY z U] 7
H
.
Isp Crook 2 FA4NRFE ai IR8E F344 ROE
_| T34NRGE > “mI
yy
i i i
\ q 3H
iH oan Ee | ieee
H ; ; Le
. 3
fi r a
[~ idyard
lopli Fi. ess udyar
unitealpics Hideway 2 United States Highway 2 — | L
i re
3 2 3 k Fanos
T32N| : $ T32NR8E TF2NRO
i 4 T32NR7E_3 L—-433—|
\A 4
power Lind Ei
[ An)
| I peta (tue to. fee :
National Wildlife Refuge/ - I
Srercectn Se ene earn he ! Waterfowl Production Area (Ex ocountes Roads |
crea am Neianee
ne 208 s 7 I<”. EWS Easements = Major Highway '
_— a | Easement Type Biss Sy |
1 t— felled © Cities/Towns toned bocal Roads 1
rassian ra
! Wetland ea —US Forest Service |
K 00.4509 118 27 36 45 54 6372, 1 Wale: off Viciiena'tack Streams '
jiles
ee Oe ee =
#### STATE of Louisiana v. John O. STEPHENS.

No. 60157.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 5, 1977.

In re: John 0. Stephens, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus and stay order.

Writ and stay order denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction. As to the motion to quash, there is an adequate remedy by appeal in the event of conviction.
No. 96-1214.

#### Crane *v.*Olsten Staffing Services et al.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
NOTICE: NOT FOR PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE

LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA
, R e spondent
,

v.

BRIAN ODELL HOPSON
, P e titioner

.
N o . 1 CA

- CR 13

- 0369 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. C R2009

- 120677

- 001 The Honorable Rosa Mroz , Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELI EF DENIED

COUNSEL
Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix By Diane Meloche Counsel for Petitioner

Brian Odell Hopson
, Tucson Petitione r

MEMORANDUM DECISION
Presiding Judge Jon W. Thompson, Judge Donn Kessler and Judge Kent E. Cattani delivered the decision of the Court.STATE v. HOPSON Decision of the Court

2 PER CURIAM :

¶1 Petitioner Brian Odell Hopson petitions this court for review of the dismissal of his petition for post

- conviction relief. We have

c onsidered the petition for rev iew and, for the reasons stated, grant review and deny relief.

¶2 A jury convicted Hopson of four counts of aggravated assault and the trial court sentenced him to four c oncurrent terms of twenty years’ imprisonment. Hopson volu ntarily dismissed his direct appeal and now seeks review of the summary dismissal of his second petition for post

conviction relief. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.9(c).

¶3 Hopson’s petition for post

- conviction relief asserted that the Arizona Department of Corrections interfer ed with his efforts to file a post

trial motion pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 24. The superior court properly denied relief because this is not a cognizable claim under Rule 32.1

. ¶4 While Hopson’s petition for review arguably presents additional issues, Hopson did not raise those issues in his petition for post

conviction relief. A petition for review may not present issues that were not first presented to the trial court. State v . Ramirez , 126 Ariz. 464, 467, 616 P.2d 924, 927 (App. 1980); State v. Wagstaff , 161 Ariz. 66, 71, 775 P.2d 1130, 1135 (App. 1988); State v. Bortz , 169 Ariz. 575, 577 , 821 P.2d 236, 238 (App. 1991); Ariz. R. Crim. P. 32.9(c)(1)(ii).

¶5 We grant review and den y relief.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1140

AN ACT

To designate the State Route 1 Bridge in the State of

Delaware as the ‘‘Senator William V. Roth, Jr. Bridge’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 1140 ES

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF SENATOR WILLIAM V. ROTH,

2 JR. BRIDGE.

3 The State Route 1 Bridge over the Chesapeake and

4 Delaware Canal in the State of Delaware is designated

5 as the ‘‘Senator William V. Roth, Jr. Bridge’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law (including regulations), map,

8 document, paper, or other record of the United States to

9 the bridge described in section 1 shall be considered to

10 be a reference to the Senator William V. Roth, Jr. Bridge.

Passed the Senate June 15, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1140

AN ACT

To designate the State Route 1 Bridge in the State

Jr. Bridge’’.of Delaware as the ‘‘Senator William V. Roth,
|              |
|--------------|
|              |
|    | This site is managed by the Bureau of Public Affairs, U.S.            Department of State.            External links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an            endorsement of the views contained therein.Copyright Information | Disclaimers |
November 17, 1977



### Acceptance of Cash Prize by a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Examiner

You have inquired whether, in light of the prohibitions contained in18 U.S.C. §213, an examiner employed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) may accept a cash prize from a grocery store affiliated with a bank examined by that official. We understand that all the names and telephone numbers from a town’s telephone directory were placed into a drum and that each week the grocery store manager drew' a name and telephoned that individual. If the individual had made a purchase during that week (as evidenced by a card stamped by a store clerk and given each customer making a purchase), he or she would win the prize. If the individual had not made a purchase, no prize was awarded and the amount of the prize plus an additional $100 would be carried over to the next week. In this case, the examiner won a prize amounting to $1,000.Section 213 prohibits an examiner or assistant examiner from accepting a “loan or gratuity” from any bank examined by him or “from anyperson connected therewith.” We understand that this statutory language has been interpreted by the FD IC to prohibit an FD IC examiner from accepting a loan or gratuity from any bank examined by him orfrom any entity affiliated with the bank through a bank holding company or otherwise. As mentioned above, the grocery store is apparently affiliated with a bank examined by the examiner. We do not believe that the cash prize, randomly awarded, should be regarded as a “gratuity” within the meaning of § 213. Its predecessor was enacted as § 22 of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, 38 Stat. 272.The report of the House Committee on Banking and Currency described the provision in the following terms:

In this section it is sought to correct a bad practice, all too prevalent, of paying fees to bank examiners in order that they may 

### 77-65 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE

GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE FEDERAL

DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

264make a favorable report upon the condition of a bank; . . . The

extent of [this practice] cannot be stated, but that [it prevails] is certain; and it is equally clear that [it is] opposed to public welfareand to sound banking, besides being wholly at variance with fundamental principles of honorable personal conduct. H.R. Rep. No. 69, 63d Cong., 1st Sess., 72 (1913).

It appears from this description that Congress intended to bar payments specifically directed at bank examiners and therefore likely to have a corrupting influence. See also, United States v. Bristol, 473 F. 2d 439, 442-43 (5th Cir. 1973). A prize awarded on a random basis meets neither of these tests, and we see no reason to give the statute an expansive reading to cover a situation, such as that present here, where the principal aims of the statute would not be advanced.Therefore, based on the facts as given to us, we see no legal objection to the bank examiner’s acceptance of the cash prize.

L e o n U l m a n Deputy Assistant Attorney General

Office o f Legal Counsel

265
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries III, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: January 30, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries III, Inc.
315 QR

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000

Feet /

Apalachia Reservoir

Land Management Plan

Tile: B3

Jul 24, 2008

\\alismurphy\home\mprlm\projects\landplan\Maps\Apalachia_land_plan\Apalachia_land_plan_for_Web.mxd
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and
Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Gary D. Wrench,
the Chief Financial Officer of OpticNet, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies
that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
28, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end
of the period covered by the Quarterly Report and results of operations
of the Company for the period covered by the Quarterly Report.           

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to OpticNet, Inc. and will
be retained by OpticNet, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

|                                                           |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: August 8, 2003                                      |  | 
|                                                           |  | 
|/s/ Gary D. Wrench

Gary D. Wrench
Chief Financial Officer |  |