alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of PDF Solutions, Inc. (“the Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on August 10, 2009 (“the Report”), I,John K. Kibarian, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
|                        | /s/ JOHN K.  KIBARIAN                    |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                        | John K. Kibarian                         |
|                        | *President  and Chief Executive Officer* |
|                        | *(Principal  Executive Officer)*         |
|                        |                                     |
| Date:  August 10, 2009 |                                     |

 

----
AFS

- 14

- 164

- E June 19, 2014

Mr. Lyle Panepinto

Director of Operations

Southern Seaplane, Inc.

#1 Coquille Drive

Belle Chasse, LA 70037

Dear Mr . Panepinto :

Th is is in response to your lette r s , dated February 10 th and March 17, 2014

, (public docket

No. FAA

- 2014

- 0086) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of

Southern Seaplane, Inc. (Southern Seaplane) for an exemption from part 141, Appendix I of

Title 14 , Code of Federal Regulations ( 14 CFR)

. The exemption, if granted, would allow

Southern Seaplane relie f from Private Pilot / Additional Class Rating aeronautical experience

requirements.

T he FAA has determined that an exemption is not the means to obtain the relief you seek.

Section 141.55(d) and (e) contain provisions that enable a pilot school to reques t and receive

approval for any training course under part 141 that does not meet the minimum ground and

flight training requirements provided certain provision and conditions are met.

Th e FAA Flight Standards Service, through your local Flight Standards District Office

(FSDO )

, has the authority to review any request that is submitted under § 141.55. The final

decision to approve or reject such a submission remains with the FSDO

.

Accordingly, b ecause the relief you seek is already covered under differen t regulations, we

will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

James A. Viola

Manager, General Aviation and Commercial Division
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 18 (Tuesday, January 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2061]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meetings:

    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate and review grant applications.
    Name of SEP: Cancer Therapy with Activated Natural Killer Cells.
    Date: February 10, 1997.
    Time: 1 p.m.
    Place: Teleconference, Executive Plaza North, Room 635E, 6130 
Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: David Irwin, PH.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Executive Plaza 
North, Room 635E, 6130 Executive Boulevard, MSC 7405, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7405, telephone: 301/402-0371.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the above 
meetings due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the grant review and funding cycle.

    Name of SEP: Cancer Prevention and Control Research Small Grant 
Program.
    Date: February 19, 1997.
    Time: 1 p.m.
    Place: Teleconference, Executive Plaza North, Room 611, 6130 
Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Kevin T. Ryder, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Executive Plaza 
North, Room 611, 6130 Executive Boulevard, MSC 7405, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7405, telephone: 301/496-2785.

    Name of SEP: Bone Marrow Transplantation in Human Disease Review 
Panel.
    Date: February 27, 1997.
    Time: 1 p.m.
    Place: Teleconference, Executive Plaza North, Room 643H, 6130 
Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Judy Mietz, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Executive Plaza 
North, Room 643H, 6130 Executive Boulevard, MSC 7405, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7405, telephone: 301/496-2378.

    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552(c)(4) and 552(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. Applications 
and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications 
and/or proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.393, Cancer 
Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and 
Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, 
Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, 
Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control.)

    Dated: January 22, 1997.
Paula N. Hayes,
Acting Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-2061 Filed 1-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 32(a)


              SECTION 1350 Certification (Chief Executive Officer)


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coastal Financial  Corporation,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
the  Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I Michael C. Gerald,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 to the best of
my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of and for the period covered by the Report.

This Certification is provided as of May 10, 2006.



                                           /s/   Michael C. Gerald
                                           ---------------------------
                                           Michael C. Gerald
                                           President/Chief Executive Officer


                                       40
Satellite Map of Port-au-Prince, Haiti–2010–Natural Color

By

Christopher J. Cole1

and Jeff Sloan2

2010

General Information Product 102

U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

Base boundary data derived from 1:1,000,000 scale U.S. Geological Survey National Map 1:24,000

digital data, accessed 2010 at http://bpgeo.cr.usgs.gov/viewer.htm.

Image base mosaic produced from three 2.4-meter QuickBird© scenes. Date of collection January 15, 2010.

QuickBird data courtesy of DigitalGlobe, 2010.

This dataset has been geocorrected using orthorectified Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery in order to enhance spatial accuracy.

Multispectral Red (Band 3), Green (Band 2) and Blue (Band 1) shown.

UTM projection, Zone 18N, World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84).

1

Parallel, Inc., P.O. Box 281149, Lakewood, CO 80228.

2

USGS Rocky Mountain Geographic Science Center, P.O. Box 25046, MS-516, Denver, CO 80225.

Digital cartography by C.J. Cole, 2010.

Image base mosaic by C.J. Cole, 2010.

Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U. S. Government.

Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from individual copyright owners to reproduce any

copyrighted materials contained within this report.

Not for commercial use.

72°16'0"W

72°16'0"W

72°17'0"W

72°17'0"W

72°18'0"W

72°18'0"W

72°19'0"W

72°19'0"W

72°20'0"W

72°20'0"W

72°21'0"W

72°21'0"W

72°22'0"W

72°22'0"W

72°23'0"W

72°23'0"W

72°24'0"W

72°24'0"W

72°25'0"W

72°25'0"W

72°26'0"W

72°26'0"W

72°27'0"W

72°27'0"W

72°28'0"W

72°28'0"W

72°29'0"W

18°36'0"N

18°36'0"N

18°35'0"N

18°35'0"N

18°34'0"N

18°34'0"N

18°33'0"N

18°33'0"N

18°32'0"N

18°32'0"N

18°31'0"N

18°31'0"N

18°30'0"N

18°30'0"N

18°29'0"N

18°29'0"N

18°28'0"N

18°28'0"N

Dominican

Republic

Haiti

Carrefour

Port-au-Prince

Port-au-Prince Bay

Toussaint

L'Ouverture

Airport

Pétion-Ville

Frorse River

Momance River

© 2010 DigitalGlobe

Earthquake epicenter denoted by yellow circle. Epicenter data courtesy of the USGS Earthquake Hazards Program

(http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/us2010rja6.php). Image is 10-meter ALOS AVNIR-2, date of

collection January 13, 2010. UTM projection, Zone 18N, World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84).

© 2010 JAXA

0 0.5 1 2 3 4

Miles

0 1 2 4 6 8

Kilometers

Area of image
#### Chase Watch Corp. et al. *v.*United States

No. 7891.

Entry No. 717530, etc.

(Decided October 5, 1950)

*Lane, Young & Fox (William H. Fox*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

LawreNce, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the merchandise the subject of these .appeals are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Gothic Watch Co.,*23 Cust. Ct. 235, Reap. Dec. 7712, .affirming the judgment in *Gothic Watch Co.*v. *United States,*19 Cust. Ct. 309, Reap. Dec. 7438, and that the record in Reap. Dec. 7712, *supra,*may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts, I find that the attempted appraisement •embodied in the second return of value by the appraiser of the merchandise covered by each of the appeals for reappraisement enumer.■ated in the annexed schedule, which is marked “A” and made a part •of this decision, was illegal, null, and void, and that the appraiser’s ■original return of value in each case, as reported by hint to the collector of customs, constituted his appraisal of the merchandise pursuant to section 500 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1500), .and was final and conclusive in the absence of any appeal pursuant to :section 501 of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1501).

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### Clarence E. HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James V. CROSBY, Jr., Charlie Crist, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-10621.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Jan. 24, 2006.

D. Todd Doss, D. Todd Doss, P.A., Lake City, FL, for Hill.

Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Fla. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, FL, for Appellees.

*1085Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

Appellant Clarence Edward Hill has been convicted of capital murder in Florida and sentenced to death. His execution is scheduled for today, January 24, 2006, at 6:00 p.m. On January 20, 2006, he applied to this court for leave to file a second and successive habeas petition in an effort to forestall his execution. We denied his application in an order entered earlier today. At the same time, we denied his application under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1651 and 2251 for a stay of his execution.

Also on January 20, 2006, appellant brought this suit for declaratory and in-junctive relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. He contends that death by lethal injection causes pain and unnecessary suffering and thus constitutes cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. He seeks a permanent injunction barring his execution. On January 21, 2006, the district court issued an order dismissing appellant’s complaint on the ground that the complaint “is the ‘functional equivalent’ of a successive habeas petition,” and that the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain it in the absence of an order from the court of appeals granting appellant leave to file a successive petition.

The district court relied on as authority for its ruling our decision in *Robinson v.*Crosby, 358 F.3d 1281 (11th Cir.2004), which, as the district court properly observed, dealt with “the very issue” appellant’s complaint presents here. Appellant now appeals the district court’s order, and he asks that we stay his execution pending our disposition of his appeal.

It is clear to us that the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider appellant’s claim because it is the functional equivalent of a successive habeas petition and he failed to obtain.leave of this court to file it. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). And as the panel observed in *Robinson,*“such an application to file a successive petition would be due to be denied in any event. *See In re Provenzano,*215 F.3d 1233, 1235-36 (11th Cir.2000), *cert. denied,*530 U.S. 1256, 120 S.Ct. 2710, 147 L.Ed.2d 979 (2000) (concluding that a claim that lethal injection constitutes cruel and unusual punishment does not meet the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2)(A) or (B)).”

For this reason, we DENY appellant’s application for a stay of his execution pending appeal.

SO ORDERED.
#### Kay W. EUBANKS, Individually, and Eubanks Realty, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellants, v. John R. STOCKS, Individually, et al., Appellees.

No. CC-129.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 1, 1977.

Davisson F. Dunlap, Jr., Pennington, Wilkinson & Sauls, Tallahassee, for appellants.

Sam Spector and Kenneth R. Hart, Brown, Pelham, McDonnell & Hart, Tallahassee, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, who were plaintiffs in the trial court, appeal an order dismissing Counts I and II of their amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Our review reveals that the dismissed counts fail to allege recoverable damages. Further, even were recoverable damages alleged, the trial judge was eminently correct in determining that no cause of action was stated. (Please see *Turvey v. Kulazenka,*341 So.2d 551 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), wherein is cited *Beagle v. Bagwell,*169 So.2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964).

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, C. J., and RAWLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
No. 96-6065.

#### Battle *v.*Connecticut.

App. Ct. Conn. Cer-tiorari denied.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1762 

To repeal the imposition of withholding on certain payments made to vendors 

by government entities and to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 

1986 to modify the calculation of modified adjusted gross income for 

purposes of determining eligibility for certain healthcare-related programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 31, 2011 

Mr. BROWN of Massachusetts (for himself and Ms. SNOWE) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To repeal the imposition of withholding on certain payments 

made to vendors by government entities and to amend 

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the calculation of modified adjusted gross income for purposes of 

determining eligibility for certain healthcare-related programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Withholding Tax Relief 

5 Act of 2011’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1762 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF IMPOSITION OF WITHHOLDING ON CER2 TAIN PAYMENTS MADE TO VENDORS BY GOV3 ERNMENT ENTITIES. 

4 The amendment made by section 511 of the Tax In5 crease Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 is re6 pealed and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be 

7 applied as if such amendment had never been enacted. 

8 SEC. 3. MODIFICATION OF CALCULATION OF MODIFIED AD9 JUSTED GROSS INCOME FOR DETERMINING 

10 CERTAIN HEALTHCARE PROGRAM ELIGI11 BILITY. 

12 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section 

13 36B(d)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

14 amended by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of clause (i), by 

15 striking the period at the end of clause (ii) and inserting 

16 ‘‘, and’’, and by adding at the end the following new 

17 clause: 

18 ‘‘(iii) any amount of social security 

19 benefits of the taxpayer excluded from 

20 gross income under section 86.’’. 

21 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

22 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

23 of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 23







            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------



We  consent  to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
333-120812 of eLEC Communications Corp. on Form S-8 of our report dated February
14,  2006  appearing  in  the  Annual Report on Form 10-K of eLEC Communications
Corp.  for  the  year  ended  November  30,  2005.





/s/  Nussbaum  Yates  &  Wolpow,  P.C.





Melville,  New  York
February  14,  2006
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                                 ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Sunrise Medical Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
No. 33-44082 on Form S-4, Statement No. 333-14493 on Form S-4, Statement 
No. 33-81316 on Form S-4, Statement No. 33-49500 on Form S-3, Statement 
No. 33-88216 on Form S-8, Statement No. 33-35797 on Form S-8, Statement 
No. 33-82842 on Form S-8, and Statement No. 33-39887 on Form S-8 of Sunrise 
Medical Inc. of our report dated August 13, 1997 relating to the consolidated 
balance sheets of Sunrise Medical Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 27, 1997 
and June 28, 1996 and the related consolidated statements of operations, 
stockholders' equity and cash flows and related financial statement schedule 
for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 27, 1997, which 
report appears in the June 27, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Sunrise 
Medical Inc.

KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Los Angeles, California
September 16, 1997
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20444]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Government in the Sunshine Meeting Notice

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, August 6, 1997.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-3207, beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting.

    Dated: July 30, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-20444 Filed 7-30-97; 10:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 111 

For the relief of Shigeru Yamada. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2005 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Shigeru Yamada. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SHIGERU 

4 YAMADA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Shigeru Yamada shall be eligible for 

8 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

9 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi10 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi11 grant visa under section 204 of that Act or for adjustment 

12 of status to lawful permanent resident. 
2 

•S 111 IS

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Shigeru Yamada 

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), Shigeru Yamada shall be considered 

4 to have entered and remained lawfully and shall be eligible 

5 for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immi6 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date 

7 of enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Shigeru Yamada, the Secretary of State shall 

16 instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the cur17 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im18 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of birth of Shigeru Yamada under section 203(a) 

20 of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, 

21 the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail22 able to natives of the country of birth of Shigeru Yamada 

23 under section 202(e) of that Act. 

Æ
No. 96-6786.

#### Burton *v.*Burton,

519 U. S. 1082. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.
#### Jeff DONNER, Appellant, v. ARKWRIGHT-BOSTON MANUFACTURERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Appellees.

No. 76-777.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 10, 1977.

Rehearing Denied June 20, 1977.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Ratiner & Glinn, Miami, for appellant.

*1211Richard M. Gale, Stephens & Schwartz, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON, J., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Vandercar v. David,*96 So.2d 227 (Fla.3d DCA 1957).