alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42971]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21110]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

[Docket No. RP96-320-017]
August 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 1, 1997, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
(Koch) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be effective June 
19, 1997:

Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 29

    On June 19, 1997, Koch filed Tenth Revised Sheet No. 29 in its 
Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, reflecting a recent negotiated rate with 
Texaco Exploration and Production, Inc. (Texaco). This filing was made 
to disclose all the relevant information regarding a negotiated rate 
transaction regarding a gathering rate on the Tooke #21 Well in Gregg 
County, Texas. On July 17, 1997, the Commission issued an ``Order 
Accepting Tariff Sheets Subject to Conditions'' requesting that Koch 
``clarify and revise the tariff sheet to indicate: (1) whether the 
gathering service is firm or interruptible, (2) the applicable receipt 
and delivery points; (3) the volumes to be transported under the 
negotiated transaction.'' In addition the Commission requested Koch to 
clarify the gathering rate units and revise the tariff accordingly. In 
response to the Commission's requests Koch is filing a Twelfth Revised 
Sheet No. 29 to comply with the July 17th order.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21110 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2346 

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to modify 

the definition of the term ‘‘biobased product’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. PRYOR (for himself and Mr. BLUNT) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, 

and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act 

of 2002 to modify the definition of the term ‘‘biobased 

product’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Forest Products Fair5 ness Act of 2012’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF BIOBASED PRODUCT. 

7 Section 9001 of the Farm Security and Rural Invest8 ment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 8101) is amended— 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2346 IS

1 (1) by striking paragraph (4) and inserting the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(4) BIOBASED PRODUCT.— 

4 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘biobased 

5 product’ means a product determined by the 

6 Secretary to be a commercial or industrial prod7 uct (other than food or feed) that is— 

8 ‘‘(i) composed, in whole or in signifi9 cant part, of biological products, including 

10 renewable domestic agricultural materials 

11 and forestry materials; or 

12 ‘‘(ii) an intermediate ingredient or 

13 feedstock. 

14 ‘‘(B) INCLUSION.—The term ‘biobased 

15 product’, with respect to forestry materials, in16 cludes forest products that meet biobased con17 tent requirements, notwithstanding market ma18 turity.’’; 

19 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (9) through 

20 (14) as paragraphs (10) through (15), respectively; 

21 and 

22 (3) by inserting after paragraph (8) the fol23 lowing: 

24 ‘‘(9) FOREST PRODUCT.— 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2346 IS

1 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘forest prod2 uct’ means a product made from materials de3 rived from the practice of forestry or the man4 agement of growing timber. 

5 ‘‘(B) INCLUSIONS.—The term ‘forest prod6 uct’ includes— 

7 ‘‘(i) pulp, paper, paperboard, pellets, 

8 and wood products; and 

9 ‘‘(ii) any recycled products derived 

10 from forest materials.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Share Repurchase Agreement dated February 10



 Exhibit 4.8 
 10 February, 2006 
 SHARE REPURCHASE AGREEMENT 
 THIS AGREEMENT is made on 10 February, 2006 
 BETWEEN 

  

	 (1)
	 CGen Digital Media Company Limited, a company with limited liability incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands
with registered office at 4th Floor, P.O. Box 2804, George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands (the “Company”); and



  

	(2)	Chan Yi Sing of Unit 102, Block 67, King’s Garden, 88Jinyu Road, Shanghai 201103, P.R.C. (the “Shareholder”). 

 WHEREAS 
 The Shareholder holds 4,853,898 series A preferred shares of
US$0.000001 each par value, presently nil paid, in the Company subscribed at a subscription price of US$0.10301 per share (the “Subscription Price”). The Company and the Shareholder have agreed that the Subscription Price be varied to
US$0.000001 per share (the “Varied Subscription Price”) upon the signing of this Agreement and the Company will thereafter repurchase from the Shareholder all such shares at a consideration of US$0.000001 per share. 
 NOW IT IS AGREED BY THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS: 
  

	1.	The Company agrees to the variation of the Subscription Price and acknowledges receipt of the Varied Subscription Price from the Shareholder and hereby agrees to credit the
Repurchased Shares as fully paid. 

  

	2.	The Shareholder agrees to sell to the Company, and the Company agrees to purchase from the Shareholder, the Repurchased Shares and all rights attached thereto, free of any security,
liens, liabilities, responsibilities and any third party rights. 

  

	3.	The Repurchased Shares will be sold and purchased at a consideration of US$0.000001 per Repurchase Share. 

  

	4.	The Repurchased Shares will be sold an purchased on the date when this Agreement is executed and the Shareholder shall deliver to the Company the share certificates for the
Repurchased Shares. 

  

	5.	This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the Cayman Islands. 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF each of the Parties hereto has signed this Agreement on the date first set forth above.

  

							
	CGEN DIGITAL MEDIA COMPANY LIMITED	 	CHINA YI SING
				
	 /S/
	 		 	 /S/
	 	
	Name: Tian Guanyong	 		 		 	
	Position: CEO
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




CATAPULT COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION




EXECUTIVE OFFICER FY2008 VARIABLE COMPENSATION PLAN





	1.	 	Officer performance-based compensation for each quarter of fiscal year 2008 will be based
exclusively on attainment by the Company of order bookings goals approved by the Board of
Directors or Compensation Committee for those quarters.






	2.	 	Assigned target bonus amounts are established by the Compensation Committee in consultation
with the Chief Executive Officer. Target bonuses will be paid in cash on a quarterly basis
with respect to each quarter of fiscal year 2008 starting at achievement by the Company of 50%
of the order bookings target and continuing on a linear basis to 100% achievement, at which
level 100% of the target bonus will be paid. Should the Company exceed the order bookings
target, executive officers will receive additional bonus compensation calculated by extending
the line starting at 50% at the same slope; e.g., the bonus will be double the target bonus
for a particular quarter if orders (bookings) are 150% of the approved targets.






	3.	 	The compensation committee delegates to the CEO the power to award Company-wide bonuses to
executive officers provided that the method used to determine these bonuses is comparable to
that used to determine the bonuses for non- executive officers.






	4.	 	The participants in this plan shall be those persons designated from time to time by the
board of directors as the executive officers of the Company.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                           7,432
<SECURITIES>                                    13,387
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,926
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,034
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,961
<PP&E>                                          10,609
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,854
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,667
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,501
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,826
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,667
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,934
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,466
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    21
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,189)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,636
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,804
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,832
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,832
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62
        

</TABLE>
# C_2014184EN.01000502.xml

| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/5

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Latina (Italy)) — Francesco Acanfora v Equitalia Sud SpA — Agente di Riscossione Latina and Agenzia delle Entrate — Ufficio di Latina

(Case C-181/13)
   (1)

(Case C-181/13)

1

((Request for a preliminary ruling - Article 107 TFEU - ‘State aid’ - National legislation which, in the event that tax is not paid, obliges the taxable person to pay the tax collection agency an amount equal to 9% of the sums entered in the tax roll as remuneration for tax collection activities - Description of the factual context - Lack of description - Manifestly inadmissible))

2014/C 184/07

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Commissione tributaria provinciale di Latina

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Francesco Acanfora

Applicant:

Defendants: Equitalia Sud SpA — Agente di Riscossione Latina, Agenzia delle Entrate — Ufficio di Latina

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Commissione tributaria provinciale di Latina — Interpretation of Article 107 TFEU — ‘State aid’ — National legislation which, in the event that the assessment notice is not complied with, obliges the taxable person to pay the tax collection agency an amount equal to 9% of the sums entered in the tax roll as collection fees

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Latina (Italy) by decision of 5 December 2012 is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 20.07.2013.

1

---
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2418 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain electrical connectors. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain electrical 

connectors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Banana jack connectors (provided for in subheading 

8536.69.80) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2418 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
BLM Planning Units
and
Sage-grouse Occurren
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By: 
Name:
    
    /s/ Sean P. McGrath

Sean P. McGrathTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
    
    May 13, 2011
No. 48936.

#### Protests 767289-G, etc., of Bailey, Green & Elger (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the embossed metal buttons in question are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Bailey*(30 C. C. P. A. 228, C. A. D. 237). Inasmuch as the merchandise in question was entered prior to the effective date of the trade agreement with Czechoslovakia (T. D. 49458) the lower rate referred to therein was held not applicable to the buttons in question. ’They were therefore held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 349 as claimed.
Before the Third Division,

May 14, 1943

No. 48283.

#### Protest 76699-K of W. R. Grace & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It appeared that the Government because of the destruction of its records could not state whether any or all of the cotton contained in the 14 bales involved was part of the drawback entry upon which drawback was paid or whether part of the drawback entry upon which no drawback was paid. At the trial herein plaintiff conceded that the records of the importer with respect to drawback entries were also destroyed. Therefore proof was not available to either party. Plaintiff’s counsel introduced in evidence a letter addressed to the collector waiving the right to protest but it was noted that it only related to “goods exported for the benefit of drawback.” The defendant claims the burden is on plaintiff to prove that no drawback was refunded on the 14 bales in question. The court stated that the proper time to submit' such evidence was when the original protest was tried and not after the judgment of the court had become final, since the court’s judgment is not subject to a collateral attack. Citing *United States*v. *Kurtz*(5 Ct. Cust. Appls. 144, T. D. 34192); *Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co.*v. *United States*(13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 451, T. D. 41347); *Frank P. Dow Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(T. D. 48163); *Fulghum*v. *United States*(1 Cust. Ct. 284, C. D. 66), and cases cited therein. The court therefore found that since the merchandise here involved was held to be free of duty in the judgment of the court, the same having become final in the absence of a timely application for rehearing or an appeal for review, it was the duty of the collector to reliquidate the entry in accordance with the court’s judgment in the original ease. The protest was therefore sustained.
exv10w4



 





Exhibit 10.4




LSI Corporation Director Fees



The
following table shows the fees that we pay our outside Directors for their service on our Board of
Directors and its committees.






			
	For service as:	 	The Annual Fee is:
	 	 	 
	Member of the Board of Directors
	 	$60,000
	Chairman of the Board of Directors
	 	additional $60,000
	 	 	 
	Member of the Audit Committee
	 	$15,000
	Chairman of the Audit Committee
	 	additional $7,500
	 	 	 
	Member of the Compensation Committee
	 	$10,000
	Chairman of the Compensation Committee
	 	additional $7,500
	 	 	 
	Member of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee
	 	$10,000
	Chairman of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee
	 	additional $7,500





In
addition, each outside Director receives annually an option to purchase 30,000 shares of our common
stock.


Inside
Directors do not receive any additional compensation for their
service on our Board of Directors.
Letter Agreement dated as of September 10, 2007



 Exhibit 10.1 
 

 
 Aviva Global Services Singapore Pte Ltd 137 Cecil Street #08-00 Aviva Building Singapore 069537

 www.aviva-asia.com 
 Company
Registration Number: 200303457R 
  

			
	EXLSERVICE HOLDINGS, INC	  	Please contact
	350 Park Avenue, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10022	  	
		  	Telephone number
	EXL SERVICE.COM (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED	  	Fax number
	103A, Ashoka Estate, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi 110 001	  
		  	Your reference
	NOIDA CUSTOMER OPERATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED	  	Our reference
	103A, Ashoka Estate, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi 110 001	  

 September 6th, 2007 (“Effective Date”) 
 Dear Sirs 
 2ND AMENDMENT
LETTER 
 We refer to the Amendment Letter with the Effective Date of 1st July 2007 (the “July 1, 2007 Letter”). 
 The parties hereby agree as follows (terms will be used herein as defined in the July 1, 2007 Letter): 
 To replace paragraphs (b) and
(c) of the July 1, 2007 Letter with the following (the remaining provisions of which remain unchanged): 
  

	 (b)
	 That if AGSS elects to exercise the Call Option, pursuant to clause 10.2 of the Virtual Shareholders Agreement
(“VSA”), it will not serve a Call Option notice that is effective prior to January 1st, 2008. If AGSS elects to exercise the Call
Option, it will deliver a notice substantially similar to the July 1, 2007 Letter.


  

	 (c)
	 The Call Option Period is reduced to 3 months where AGSS elects to exercise the Call Option Notice. Accordingly, such
Call Option shall take effect no earlier than April 2nd, 2008. 


 This letter may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which, when executed and delivered, will be an original, and all the counterparts together will constitute one and the same instrument. The parties
agree to accept delivery of an executed counterpart by facsimile transmission. 
 Kindly confirm your
agreement to the terms of this 2ND Amendment Letter by countersigning the enclosed copy and returning it to me. 
  

					
	Yours faithfully	 		 	On behalf of
		 		 	EXLSERVICE HOLDINGS, INC.
	 /s/
	 		 	 I agree to the terms of this letter.

	Authorised Signatory & Director	 	
	AVIVA GLOBAL SERVICES	 		 	 /s/

	SINGAPORE PRIVATE LIMITED	 		 	Authorised Signatory & Director
			
	On behalf of	 		 	On behalf of
	NOIDA CUSTOMER OPERATIONS	 		 	EXL SERVICE.COM (INDIA)
	PRIVATE LIMITED	 		 	PRIVATE LIMITED
	I agree to the terms of this letter.	 		 	I agree to the terms of this letter.
			
	 /s/
	 		 	 /s/

	Authorised Signatory & Director	 		 	Authorised Signatory & Director
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20297]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Combined Arts Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Combined Arts Advisory Panel, Presenting Section (Heritage & 
Preservation/Education & Access/Planning & Stabliziation/Creation & 
Presentation categories) to the National Council on the Arts will be 
held on August 20-22, 1997. The panel will meet from 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 
p.m. on August 20, and from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on August 21-22 in 
Room 716 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, 
Washington, D.C., 20506. A portion of this meeting, from 10:30 a.m. to 
1:00 p.m. on August 22, will be open to the public for a policy 
discussion on guidelines, Leadership initiatives, Millennium, planning, 
and field needs and trends.
    The remaining portions of this meeting, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. 
on August 20, and from 9:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 
p.m. on August 22, are for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, 
evaluation, and recommendation on applications for financial assistance 
under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 
1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to the 
agency by grant applicants. In accordance with the determination of the 
Chairman of March 31, 1997, these sessions will be closed to the public 
pursuant to subsection (c)(4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 
5, United States Code.
    If you need special accomodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20506, 202/682-5532, 
TYY/TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D.C. 20506, or call (202) 682-5691.

    Dated: July 28, 1997.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Office of Guidelines and Panel Operations, National 
Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 97-20297 Filed 7-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
#### James L. TRASPORT, Appellant, v. Rachel S. TRASPORT, Appellee.

No. 75-1318.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 6, 1976.

Robert H. Springer of Kohl, Springer, Springer & Vassallo, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert S. Levy, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of *Zimmer v. Zimmer,*328 So.2d 525 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

MAGER, C. J., and WALDEN and DOW-NEY, JJ., concur.
No. 00-6604.

#### Thomas *v.*Johnston, Judge, Superior Court of Georgia, Muscogee County, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.