alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lena A. BARTOCCI, Petitioner, v. Neno J. BARTOCCI, Respondent.

No. 51288.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 12, 1978.

Frank A. McClung, Brooksville, for petitioner.

Joseph E. Johnston, Jr., of the Law Offices of Joseph E. Johnston, Jr., Brooksville, for respondent.

*65PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. The Writ was issued; and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the Writ must be and is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.
| (1) |   | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   |
|-----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) |   | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |

|                                                                   |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                   |   |
| /s/      Steven m.      west                                           |   |
| Name:  Steven      M. West                              |   |
| Title:     Chief      Executive Officer  |   |

|                                                                                                                                                                                                 |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                 |   |
| /s/ Douglas S.      Prince                                                                                                                                                                           |   |
| Name:   Douglas      S. Prince                                                                                                                                                   |   |
| Title:     Executive      Vice-President, Finance              and      Chief Financial Officer  |   |
#### Troy WALKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 99-397.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 28, 1999.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Manuel Alvarez, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Regine Monestime, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, COPE, and LEVY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See*Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(B)(ii); *Velez v. State,*725 So.2d 1280 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); *Jones v. State,*708 So.2d 337 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).
No. 00-757.

#### Williams *v.*Houston Firefighters’ Relief and Retirement Fund et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. James ANDERSON, Appellant.

No. 73142.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Sept. 15, 1998.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 6,1998.

N. Scott Rosenblum, Asst. Public Defender, Clayton, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joanne E. Joiner, *Asst. Atty.*Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., and CRAHAN and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment and sentence entered upon his conviction by a jury of one count of forcible sodomy in violation of section 566.060 RSMo 1994 and of one count of attempted forcible rape in violation of section 566.030.2 RSMo 1994. Defendant was sentenced to ten years imprisonment on each count, to be served consecutively. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A detailed opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21134]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Public Notice

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Public Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Public notice is hereby given that the National Park Service 
proposes to award a concession contract authorizing ferry services for 
the public at Fire Island National Seashore for a period of ten (10) 
years from date of contract execution.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 10, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties should contact National Park Service, 
Fire Island National Seashore, 120 Laurel Street, Patchogue, New York 
11772 to obtain a copy of the prospectus describing the requirements of 
the proposed contract.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This contract has been determined to be 
categorically excluded from the procedural provisions of the National 
Environmental Policy Act and no environmental document will be 
prepared.

    The existing concessioner has performed its obligations to the 
satisfaction of the Secretary under an existing contract which expired 
by limitation of time on December 31, 1996, and therefore pursuant to 
the provisions of Section 5 of the Act of October 9, 1965 (79 Stat. 
969; 16 U.S.C. Sec. 20), is entitled to be given preference in the 
renewal of the contract and in the negotiation of a new contract, 
providing that the existing concessioner submits a responsive offer (a 
timely offer which meets the terms and conditions of the Prospectus). 
This means that the contract will be awarded to the party submitting 
the best offer, provided that if the best offer was not submitted by 
the existing concessioner, then the existing concessioner will be 
afforded the opportunity to match the best offer. If the existing 
concessioner agrees to match the best offer, then the contract will be 
awarded to the existing concessioner.
    If the existing concessioner does not submit a responsive offer, 
the right of preference in renewal shall be considered to have been 
waived, and the contract will then be awarded to the party that has 
submitted the best responsive offer.
    The Secretary will consider and evaluate all proposals received as 
a result of this notice. Any proposal, including that of the existing 
concessioner, must be received by the Senior Concessions Program 
Manager, Concession Management Division, not later than the sixtieth 
(60th) day following publication of this notice to be considered and 
evaluated.

    Dated: July 10, 1997.
Chrysandra L. Walter,
Acting Field Director, Northeast Field Area.
[FR Doc. 97-21134 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# In Their Own Words David Olenick, DLA Distribution

By DLA Public Affairs

                NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa.  –              
These days we take direct deposit of our paychecks for granted. Listen to David Olenick, DLA Distribution, tell the interesting story on how he was part of the team that brought the innovative concept of direct deposit to DLA. To see the full interview and for more information about DLA's history visit: https://www.dla.mil/About-DLA/History/60th-Anniversary/

20:18VIDEO  | 20:18 |In Their Own Words David Olenick, DLA Distribution, DLA 60th Anniversary Interview

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLADistributionDLA 60th AnniversaryDLA 60th Anniversary Distribution
Hiwassee River

River

Oaks

\\alismurphy\home\mprlm\projects\landplan\maps\Chatuge_land_plan\Chatuge_land_plan_for_Web.mxd

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000

Feet /

Chatuge Reservoir

Land Management Plan

Tile: D4

Jul 24, 2008
No. 6113.

#### VICTOR O. GROSZ vs. SYLVIAN BAGNERIS.

Syllabus.

Involves only issues of fact.

Appeal from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Division “C,’’ No. 104,941. Hon. E. K. Skinner, Judge.

E. P. Foley, for plaintiff and appellee.

Sullivan, Landry & Heath, for defendant and appellant.

His Honor, JOHN ST. PAUL,

rendered the opinion and decree of the ‘Court, as follows:

This is a suit upon a promissory note. The defense is failure of consideration; to-wit, that the note was given for other notes not surrendered by plaintiff and usurious interest thereon.

*297Opinion and decree, June 1st, 1914.

Rehearing refused, June 30th, 1914.

Writ denied, October 23rd, 1914.

Plaintiff swears however that the matters set np in defense have nothing whatever to do with note sued on, which was given for actual money loaned; and he is corroborated by checks which he produces.

The evidence is conflicting, hut the trial Judge, who saw and heard the witnesses, found for plaintiff, and his judgment seems correct.

Judgment affirmed.
### Dow **n East Emergency Management Institute**

**Flight Operations Standard Operating Procedure**  **(SOPs) Mandatory Operating Conditions**  1. ALL Operations to occur in Class G airspace. 2. Operators to avoid congested or populated areas, which are depicted in yellow on VFR charts. 3. Operations to be conducted over private or controlled

- access propert y. 4. Permission from land owner/controller required before commencing any flights. 5. Operations to occur during Visual Flight Rules Meteorological Conditions (VMC). 6. Aircraft to remain within Visual L ine of Sight (VMOS). 7. Geo Fence in Flight Software may be expanded by

observer with ability

to control aircraft. 8. Operations to occur during daylight hours. 9. Above Ground Level (AGL) altitude to be restricted to 999 feet. 10. All operations cond

ucted in vicinity

of airport to remain more than 2.5 NM from centerline azimuth of runway centerline measured from runway thresholds. 11. All required permissions and permits will be obtained from territorial, state, county or city jurisdictions, including loc al law enforcement, fire, or other appropriate governmental agencies. 12. All operations will include one pilot for flight control and one observer for VLOS enhanced of surrounding area near the aircraft. **Flight Operating Requirements**  **(PIC) Flight Automation** 1. PI C is required to check and verify solid GPS 3d Fix on position

. 2. PI C to verify

that all sensors are operating this includes sonar, barometric pressure and wind speed

. 3. PI C is required to verify data

- link is operating fully in automated pre

- flight sy stem p erformance check. 4. PI C is required to verify “Flight Emergency

Mode” is operating of which the mode is to be activated via radio and verify audible via ground control acknowledges mode switch and that pre programmed altitude is set for 50AGL with Circle fli ght path over home location. 5. Pre
- define responses to include behavior such as attempting to re

- establish radio communications, return to home position, return to home and land, or land in current position and release of parachute. 6. Verify

in case of Lost GP S, a manual flight mode will be enabled in “Stabilized” mode which will allow for safe flight manually to provide manual navigation inputs to assist in landing the vehicle. 7. PI C required to perform Pre

- flight Safety Checklist before flight. AgriView Aerial Solutions Form 1001

- 1A Flight Operations SOPs
(Reap. Dec. 9954)

#### Morey Machinery Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 968618, etc.

(Decided March 22, 1961)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*'William H. Orriclc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The records indicate that there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated on the schedule attached to and made part of this decision were called for hearing, and the cases were consequently ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5(a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence *639on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeals before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT DAVID B ARR

Y TONEM AN a

nd KELLY KR ISTENE TONEM A

N, Plaintiffs - Appe lla nts, v. U.S. B ANK NA, a s truste e for B e ar Ste arns Asse t-B a c ke d Se c uritie s Trust 2004-AC 7 Asse t B a c ke d C e rtific ate s Se rie s 2004-AC 7; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-56950 D.C . No. 2:12-c v-09369-M M M M R W M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia M argare t M . M orrow, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Ja

n u ary 5, 2016 ** Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia B e fore : M . SM ITH, WATFORD, a nd FR IEDLAND, C i rc uit Judge s. 

# FIL ED JAN 07 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Pa ge 2 of 2

David a nd Ke lly Tone m an a

ppe a l from

the judgm e nt dismissing the ir Se c ond Am e nde d C om

pla int with pre

judic e for fa i lure to sta

te a c la im upon whic h re lie f c an be grante d . The Tone m ans c ha lle nge the distric t c ourt’ s dism issa l of the i r c l a im s for wrongful fore c l osure , sla nde r of title , ne glige nc e , fra ud, a nd unfa ir busine ss pra c tic e s on va

rious grounds. W e a ffirm dism issa l of the se c la im s for the re a s ons sta

te d in the distric t

c ourt’ s orde r granting thede fe nda nts’ m o tion to dism iss. AFFIRM E D.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0724

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JAY LE CLEVELAND,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 24, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 17 2023

04/17/2023
----

----

| 1.     | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.     | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the LP. |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 5, 2009                                                                                        |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                               |   |   |
| /s/ Mark Gatto                                                                                                     |   |   |
| Mark Gatto                                                                                                         |   |   |
| Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-PresidentICON Capital Corp.General Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight B L.P. |
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    DIRECT RESPONSE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, T. Randolph Catanese, the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial
Officer of Direct Response Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company"), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
July 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Direct Response Financial Services, Inc. and will be retained by
Direct Response Financial Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: September 14, 2005

                                /s/ T. Randolph Catanese
                                -----------------------------------
                                Name: T. Randolph Catanese
                                Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                and Acting Chief Financial Officer


                                       9
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 11, 2019

No. 04-18-00532-CR

Daniel Cervantes SALAZAR,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR6992

Honorable Joey Contreras, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his brief is granted. We order appellant’s 

brief due February 4, 2019.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of January, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Spectrum Realty, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William J. Carden, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results of operations of the Company for the period indicated.





Dated:   May 13, 2011





/s/ William J. CardenWilliam J. CardenPresident and Chief Executive Officer
# Set

- Top Box Framework Meeting

Join us for a Webinar on January 26

Space is limited.

Reserve your Webinar seat now at:

https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/683522624

Set

- Top Box Framework Meeting

Set

- Top Box Framework Meeting Title:

Date: Thursday, January 26, 2012

Time: 9:00 AM

- 5:00 PM EST

After registering you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the Webinar.

System Requirements

PC

- based attendees

Required: Windows® 7, Vista, XP or 2003 Server

Macintosh®

- based attendees

Required: Mac OS® X 10.5 or newer
Exhibit 23.1




INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Caprius, Inc. on Form S-1 Pre-Effective Amendment No. 4 to Form S-1 (File No. 333-141647) and Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to Form S-1 (File No. 333-148792) of our report dated June 30, 2010, with respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Caprius, Inc.  and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and for the years then ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Caprius, Inc. for the years ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 which includes an explanatory paragraph as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.





/s/Marcum LLP




Marcum LLP


New York, New York


June 30, 2010