alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 
18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Minrad International, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal period ended
June 30, 2006 (the Form 10-QSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                      |                                                                                   
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 7, 2006 | /s/ William H. Burns, Jr.                                                         
|                      | William H. Burns, Jr. 
CEO 
(chief executive officer)                             
|                      |                                                                                   
|Dated: August 7, 2006 | /s/ William Bednarski                                                             
|                      | William Bednarski 
President and Chief Financial Officer
(chief financial officer)
Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) 

From: Dan and Diana Mitchell [dmitchx4@verizon.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 10:24 AM 

To: EAS (OST) 

Subject: Venango Regional Airport 

Mr. DeVany, 

I recently heard rumors in the community about the possible closure of Venango Regional Airport due to the 

DOT re-evaluating the EAS. I hope that this does not happen and it would be devastating to the area. Many 

people rely on this service, especially the elderly, since this saves them from having to travel to Pittsburgh, Erie, 

or Cleveland. This is a godsend especially in the winter months. I hope and pray that you will consider the 

community and the lives that it will effect, when you make your decision about the airport. Thank you. 

Diana Mitchell 

C 3
No. 00-6494.

#### Byrd *v.*Collins, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 147 (Thursday, July 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41035-41036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20127]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-426-000]


Nautilus Pipeline Company, LLC; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

July 25, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 23, 1997, Nautilus Pipeline Company, LLC 
(Nautilus) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed in Appendix A to the filing, to 
become effective October 1, 1997.
    Nautilus states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
order Nos. 582 & 582-A, issued September 28, 1995 in Docket No. RM95-3, 
in which the Commission revised, reorganized and updated its 
regulations governing the form composition, and filing of rates and 
tariffs for interstate pipeline companies. Specifically Nautilus 
indicates the tendered tariff sheets revise its tariff to:
    (1) Expand the table of contents to include the sections of the 
general terms and conditions in accordance with Section 154.104;
    (2) Add a statement to Nautilus' general terms and conditions for 
periodic reports in accordance with Section 154.502; and
    (3) Change the rates to reflect a thermal unit in accordance with 
Section 154.107(b).
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington DC 20426, in 
accordance with 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions and protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make Protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public

[[Page 41036]]

inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20127 Filed 7-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Walter Tatum, Chief Financial Officer of Cyberads, Inc. (the "Company") do
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  January 30, 2006
                                          /s/ WALTER TATUM
                                          ----------------------
                                          WALTER TATUM
                                          Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #9 Ltd. (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Matthew A.
      JonesName:
            Matthew
      A. JonesTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            May
      14, 2009
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON D.C., 20460

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

PC Code: 044309

DP Barcode: D395349

MEMORANDUM October 22, 2012

SUBJECT: Drinking Water Exposure Assessment in Support of the Proposed IR-4 New 

Uses of Clothianidin on Strawberry, Citrus Fruit Group, and Pistachio

TO: Sydney Jackson, Risk Manager Reviewer

Barbara Madden, Risk Manager (RM05)

Registration Division (7505P)

 AND

Marianne Lewis, Risk Manager Reviewer

Venus Eagle, Risk Manager (RM01)

Registration Division (7505P)

FROM: Reuben Baris, Environmental Scientist

Environmental Risk Branch 6

Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P)

Mark Corbin, Chief

Environmental Risk Branch 6

Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P)

This memorandum summarizes the Environmental Fate and Effects Division’s (EFED) 

assessment of drinking water exposure resulting from the proposed new uses on strawberry, 

citrus, and pistachio supported by the Interregional Research Project No. 4 (IR-4).

The previously registered use of clothianidin as a seed treatment for rice resulted in an estimated 

drinking water exposure concentration of 72 ppb. The assessed application rate was equivalent to

0.084 lb a.i./A (USEPA, 2012; DP 393235, 393972). This value is greater than the estimated 

drinking water concentrations (EDWCs) resulting from the proposed uses on strawberries, citrus, 

and pistachios (the current action). Therefore EFED recommends the use of the Tier I rice value 

of 72 ppb in the Health Effects Division (HED) dietary risk assessment. Table I compares the 

Tier I rice EDWCs to EDWCs resulting from the proposed uses.
Page 2 of 2

Table 1. Tier I EDWCs for drinking water exposure assessment based on the proposed 

clothianidin uses on strawberries, citrus, and pistachios compared to the previously 

registered rice EDWC.

Use Model

Application rate, 

lbs a.i./A

(# of 

applications)

PCA Acute Chronic

Surface water drinking water sources, 

downstream of rice paddy (0.084 lb a.i./A)

Tier I Rice 

Model 

(v1.0)

0.084

(1)

--

72 ppb <72 ppb

Maximum aerial application rate for 

proposed new uses (strawberry, citrus, 

pistachio)

FIRST 0.1

(1)

0.87

8.1 2.6

Maximum soil application rate for proposed 

new uses (strawberry, citrus, pistachio) FIRST 0.2(1) 16.1 5.2

References:

USEPA. 2012. Tier I Drinking Water Exposure Assessment for the Section 3 New Uses of 

Clothianidin on Rice and Leafy Vegetables. Memorandum from Reuben Baris to Michael 

Doherty, dated Spetember 15, 2011. DP barcodes: 393235, 393972. United States Environmental 

Protection Agency, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, Washington, DC.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                          18,775
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             358
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    105,572
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          20,236
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            20,840
<LOANS>                                        307,741
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 467,230
<DEPOSITS>                                     387,439
<SHORT-TERM>                                    26,589
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,135
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,046
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 467,230
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 23,811
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,497
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   735
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                31,043
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              12,658
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,698
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           17,345
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      233
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (354)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 19,306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,039
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,039
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,743
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.31
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,210
<LOANS-PAST>                                       336
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,950
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      139
<RECOVERIES>                                       56
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,100
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,100
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 153 (Friday, August 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20920]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company that engages either 
directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking 
activity that is listed in Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) 
or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to 
banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise 
noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than September 2, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Emprise Financial Corporation, Wichita, Kansas; to acquire up to 
9.9 percent of Mid Continent Bancshares, Inc., El Dorado, Kansas, and 
Mid Continent Federal Savings & Loan Association, El Dorado, Kansas, 
and thereby engage in operating a savings association, pursuant to 
Sec.  225.28(b)(4)(ii) of the Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 4, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-20920 Filed 8-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
No. 96-5690.

#### Steele *v.*California Department of Social Services et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-892.

#### Corugedo Partagas *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Arthur Singleton CHEEKS v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 49570.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 9, 1977.

John R. Countiss, III, Jackson, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Billy L. Gore, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hinds County; Leon F. Hendrick, Judge.

Before INZER, P. J., and SUGG and LEE, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

GILLESPIE, C. J., PATTERSON, P. J., and SMITH, ROBERTSON, WALKER and BROOM, JJ., concur.
# C_2014261EN.01001903.xml

| 11.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/19

---

Order of the President of the Court of 21 May 2014 (requests for preliminary rulings from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Walter Jubin (C-475/13), Heidemarie Retzlaff (C-476/13) v easyJet Airline Co. Ltd

(Joined Cases C-475/13 and C-476/13) (1)

1

2014/C 261/34

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 359, 7.12.2013.

1

---
July 24, 2014

Mr. Donald Dillman Managing Director, Flight Operations

Airlines for America 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue

Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20004

Dear Mr. Dillman:

This is in response to your April 7, 2014, le tter sent to the pu blic docket (No. FAA-2012- 0560) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administ ration (FAA) on behalf of Air Transport

Association of America, Inc., dba Airlines four America (A4A) for an exemption from § 61.39(b)(2) of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR).

In reviewing your petition, we note that A4A also submitted a similar petition on April 7, 2014, on the same subject, request ing that current Exemption No. 10556 be changed to reflect regulatory re ferences amended as a result of regulations that were a part of the final rule titled Pilot Certification and Qualification Requirements for Air Carrier Operations issued on July 15, 2013 (78 FR 42324).

As indicated in Exemption No. 11016, which we granted in response to your petition, § 61.39(b)(2) permits an applicant for an airline transport pilot certificate with an airplane category multiengine class rating or airline transport pilot certificate with an airplane type rating to take the practical test with an expi red knowledge test if the applicant (1) passed the knowledge test after July 31, 2014, and (2) is employed as a flightcrew member by a part 119 certificate holder conducting opera tions under part 121 at the time of the practical test and has satisfactorily accomplis hed the certificate hol der’s approved initial training program. 1

1 In anticipation of the impending statutory requirement for all pilots in part 121 operations to hold an ATP certificate by August 2, 2013, A4A petitioned the FAA for a grant of exemption for its member carriers that would permit SICs who comp leted an air carrier’s approved SIC training program to take the practical test with an expired knowledge test. The FAA granted the exemption on June 21, 2012. Former § 61.39(b) only permitted pilots who had completed an air carrier’s pilot in command training program to take the practical test with an expired knowledge test.2

Since the relief you seek has been gran ted in Exemption No. 11016, which expires July 31, 2014, we will take no further action on your petition. A copy of that exemption

is enclosed.

Sincerely,

/s/ Brenda D. Courtney Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Gordon NOVEL.

No. 60261.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 26, 1977.

In re: Gordon Novel applying for writ of mandamus or other supervisory relief.

Writ granted. Evidentiary hearing ordered.

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS, J., dissent from the granting of the writ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2223 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2223

 To address the implementation of certain prohibitions under the Bank 
          Holding Company Act of 1956, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 22, 2012

Mr. Crapo (for himself, Mr. Warner, Mr. Toomey, Mrs. Hagan, Mr. Corker, 
and Mr. Carper) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To address the implementation of certain prohibitions under the Bank 
          Holding Company Act of 1956, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMPLEMENTATION DATE OF VOLCKER RULE PROHIBITIONS.

    Section 13(c)(1) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1851(c)(1)) is amended by striking ``earlier of'' and inserting ``later 
of''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 96-5812.

#### Stadler *v.*Oklahoma.

Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 150 (Tuesday, August 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20541]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[WY-921-4210-05; WYW 138920]


Opening of National Forest System Land; Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice terminates the temporary segregative effect as to 
214.04 acres of National Forest System lands which were originally 
included in an application for exchange in the Medicine Bow National 
Forest.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 5, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Janet Booth, BLM Wyoming State Office, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, Wyoming 
82003, 307-775-6124.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the regulations contained in 43 
CFR 2091.3-2(b), at 9 a.m. on August 5, 1997, the following described 
lands will be relieved of the temporary segregative effect of exchange 
application WYW 138920. The remaining lands in the application for 
exchange will continue to be processed as requested.

Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming

T. 13 N., R. 86 W.,
    Sec. 20, lots 4, 5, 9;
    Tract 42A, 42C;
    Sec. 29, lots 1 to 4;
    Tracts 39I, 39J, 39K, 39L.

    The area described contains 214.04 acres in Carbon County.

    At 9 a.m. on August 5, 1997, the lands shall be opened to such 
forms of disposition as may by law be made of National Forest System 
lands, including location and entry under the United States mining 
laws, subject to valid existing rights, the provisions of existing 
withdrawals, other segregations of record, and the requirements of 
applicable law. Appropriation of lands described in this order under 
the general mining laws prior to the date and time of restoration is 
unauthorized. Any such attempted appropriation, including attempted 
adverse possession under 30 U.S.C. 38 (1988) shall vest no rights 
against the United States. Acts required to establish a location and to 
initiate a right of possession are governed by State law where not in 
conflict with Federal law. The Bureau of Land Management will not 
intervene in disputes between rival locators over possessory rights 
since Congress has provided for such determination in local courts.

    Dated: July 29, 1997.
Alan L. Kesterke,
Associate State Director.
[FR Doc. 97-20541 Filed 8-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-M