alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,924
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             694
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,450
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     12,193
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          14,204
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            14,264
<LOANS>                                         28,435
<ALLOWANCE>                                        600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,621
<DEPOSITS>                                      55,857
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                251
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           600
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  64,621
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,574
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,657
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   251
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,482
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,397
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,397
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,085
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    634
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,353
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,353
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       948
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.39
<LOANS-NON>                                        308
<LOANS-PAST>                                         9
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   614
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       17
<RECOVERIES>                                         3
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  600
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            600
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2198 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2198

 To implement common sense controls on the taxpayer-funded salaries of 
    government contractors by limiting reimbursement for excessive 
  compensation equal to the pay of the President of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 15, 2012

  Mrs. Boxer (for herself and Mr. Grassley) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To implement common sense controls on the taxpayer-funded salaries of 
    government contractors by limiting reimbursement for excessive 
  compensation equal to the pay of the President of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Commonsense Contractor Compensation 
Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ALLOWABLE GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR COMPENSATION 
              COSTS.

    (a) Limitation.--
            (1) Civilian contracts.--Section 4304(a)(16) of title 41, 
        United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
            ``(16) Costs of compensation of contractor and 
        subcontractor employees for a fiscal year, regardless of the 
        contract funding source, to the extent that such compensation 
        exceeds the annual amount paid to the President of the United 
        States in accordance with section 102 of title 3.''.
            (2) Defense contracts.--Section 2324(e)(1)(P) of title 10, 
        United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
            ``(P) Costs of compensation of contractor and subcontractor 
        employees for a fiscal year, regardless of the contract funding 
        source, to the extent that such compensation exceeds the annual 
        amount paid to the President of the United States in accordance 
        with section 102 of title 3.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Repeal.--Section 1127 of title 41, United States Code, 
        is hereby repealed.
            (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
        beginning of chapter 11 of title 41, United States Code, is 
        amended by striking the item relating to section 1127.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 145 (Tuesday, July 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40511-40512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19919]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[FE Docket No. 97-41-NG]


Office of Fossil Energy; Coenergy Trading Company; Order Granting 
Long-Term Authorization To Export Natural Gas To Canada For Subsequent 
Re-Import To The United States

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy of the Department of Energy gives 
notice that it has issued DOE/FE Order No. 1280 on June 20, 1997, 
granting CoEnergy Trading Company a ten-year authorization to export up 
to 80,000 Mcf per day (29.2 Bcf annually) to Canada for re-import to 
the United States. The term of the authorization is for a period 
commencing November 1, 1998, through October 31, 2008. This gas may be 
exported from the United States at the existing interconnection of 
TransCanada PipeLines Limited and Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited 
Partnership near St. Clair, Michigan, and re-imported into the United 
States at the interconnection of the Trans Quebec and Maritimes 
Pipeline and the proposed Portland Natural Gas Transmission System near 
Pittsburg, New Hampshire.
    This order is available for inspection and copying in the Office of 
Natural Gas & Petroleum Import and Export

[[Page 40512]]

Activities Docket Room, 3F-056, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence 
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-0350, (202) 586-9478. The docket room 
is open between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., June 11, 1997.
Wayne E. Peters,
Manager, Natural Gas Regulation, Office of Natural Gas and Petroleum 
Import and Export Activities, Office of Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 97-19919 Filed 7-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
No. 99-7892.

#### Frogge *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 48265.

#### Protests 866932-G, etc., of Eurasia Import Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel manila hats, similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218), and knotted hemp hats, similar to those involved in Abstract 46497, were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) as claimed.
#### Robert Stuart, plaintiff in error, *vs.*William R. Kerr, defendant in error.

*Error to Muscatine.*

The action of Account, is obsolete anil cannot legally be brought in Iowa.

This was an action of account, brought by Kerr against Stuart, in the District Court of Muscatine. At the December term, 1841, judgment was rendered on the report of the auditor for the plaintiff, in the sum of $312,12.

*241Lows & Hastings, for plaintiff in error.

Whicher, for defendant in error.

Per Cdriam,

Mason, Chief Justice.

The main question in this case, is, whether the action of account, can be legally brought fa this territory 1 Our statutes do not authorize it; and if recognized and sustained, it must be as a feature of the common law. At common law, it was allowed, but has now, almost, if not entirely become obsolete, even in England, where it has scarcely been resorted to for the last century and a half. We. believe it is recognized in none of the States which have a Chancery Court, unless authorized or regulated by statute. Many of the proceedings under this form of action are extremely inconvenient and wholly unadapted to our condition and mode of practice. We think it a useless form of action, into which it is wholly unnecessary for us to undertake the difficult, if not impracticable task of infusing life and vigor. The judgment below will therefore be reversed.
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Patrick D. O'Brien, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended March 31, 2004 of American Oil & Gas, Inc.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

     5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 14, 2004

/s/  Patrick D. O'Brien
----------------------------
     Patrick D. O'Brien
     Chief Executive Officer
----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADDED BY**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**Brent      L. Peters**

|   | · | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and                15(d) of                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | To                my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,                in                all material respects, the Company’s financial condition and results of                operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented                in                the Report. |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Brent L. Peters                                                                              |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| **Brent                L. Peters**,                Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 147 (Thursday, July 31, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40948-40949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20162]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96-227; RM-8910]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Glenrock, Wyoming

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Vixon Valley Broadcasting, 
allots Channel 252A at Glenrock, Wyoming, as the community's first 
local aural transmission service. See 61 FR 60067, November 26, 1996. 
Channel 252A can be allotted at Glenrock in compliance with the 
Commission's minimum distance separation requirements at city reference 
coordinates. The coordinates for Channel 252A at Glenrock are North 
Latitude 42-51-30 and West Longitude 105-52-24. With this action, this 
proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective September 8, 1997. The window period for filing 
applications for Channel 252A at Glenrock, Wyoming, will open on 
September 8, 1997, and close on October 9, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 96-227, adopted July 16, 1997, and 
released July 25, 1997. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Service, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC 
20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:


[[Page 40949]]



PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Sections 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 
154, as amended.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Wyoming, is 
amended by adding Glenrock, Channel 252A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-20162 Filed 7-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2349 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2349

             To suspend temporarily the duty on cyanamide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2012

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To suspend temporarily the duty on cyanamide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYANAMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Cyanamide (CAS No.  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        420-04-2)                                                          31/2015.......
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        2835.00.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
(Reap. Dec. 9974)

#### F. L. Kraemer & Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 830992.

(Decided April 12, 1961)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*'William S. Orriolc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Laweence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a reap-praisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff, and the case was ordered submitted by the court.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
UNITED
      STATES


SECURITIES
      AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington,
      D.C. 20549








FORM
      8-K





CURRENT
      REPORT





Pursuant
      to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934








Date
                of Report (date of earliest event reported):
            June
                28, 2006








TERABEAM,
                INC.(Exact
                name of registrant as specified in its
                charter)








Delaware
            000-29053
            04-2751645(State
                or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
            (Commission
                file number)
            (IRS
                employer identification no.)








2115
                O’Nel Drive, San Jose, CA
            95131(Address
                of principal executive offices)
            (Zip
                code)








Registrant’s
                telephone number, including area code:
            (408)
                731-2700








Not
                Applicable(Former
                name or former address, if changed since last
                report)







Check
      the
      appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
      satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
      provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):




o  Written
      communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
      230.425)




o  Soliciting
      material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
      240.14a-12)




o  Pre-commencement
      communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
      240.14d-2(b))




o  Pre-commencement
      communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
      240.13e-4(c))







Item
      5.02 Departure
      of Directors or Principal Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of
      Principal Officers .





The
        Company regrets to report that Patrick L. Milton, Chief Financial Officer
        and
        Treasurer, passed away on June 28, 2006.
 
 As
        previously reported, effective June 19, 2006, Brian J. Sereda had been appointed
        to serve as Acting Chief Financial Officer and Acting Treasurer for Terabeam,
        Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary Proxim Wireless Corporation. In those
        roles, he will serve as Terabeam’s acting principal financial officer and acting
        principal accounting officer.





SIGNATURE





Pursuant
      to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
      has
      duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
      duly authorized.








TERABEAM,
                INC.Dated:
                July 5, 2006
            By:
            /s/
                David L. RenauldDavid
                L. RenauldVice
                President












2
No. 00-696.

#### Froebel *v.*Meyer et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### Strawbridge & Clothier et al. *v.*United States

No. 6956.

Entry No. 381, etc.

Invoices dated Hawick, Scotland, June 1944, etc.

Certified June 1944, etc.

Entered at Philadelphia, Pa., August 4, 1944, etc.

(Decided March 4, 1947)

*Tompkins & Tompkins (J. Stuart Tompkins*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.