alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The ISCU utilizes state of the art technology 

and the following information management systems to manage and report offender information: 

• Pretrial Real Time 

 Information System Manager  (PRISM) 

• Supervision and Management 

Automated Record Tracking (SMART) 

• National Crime Information Center 

(NCIC) 

• Washington Area Law 

 Enforcement System  (WALES) 

• District of Columbia 

 Department of Corrections  Jail and Community  Corrections Information  System  (JACCS). 

COURT SE

SUP

UP

FOR THE 

PAUL A. QUANDER, JR.

 DIRECTOR

633 Indiana Avenue, N.W. 

Washington D.C. 20004 

Phone: 202-220-5300 

Fax: 202-220-5350 

THOMAS H. WILLIAMS

ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR

COMMUNITY SUPERVISION SERVICES

Phone: (202) 585-7217*Fax: (202) 585-7230 

www.csosa.gov 

ILLE

CO

O

MICHAEL GUNN

BRANCH CHIEF

ILLEGAL SUBSTANCE COLLECTION UNIT

Our goal is to provide excellent customer service and outstanding sample collection services throughout the nations capital. 

STATEMENT TATEMENT

TECHNOLOGY ECHNOLOGY
MISSION 

♦ To ensure Drug Testing Technicians operate 

consistent with established drug testing protocols. 

♦ To maintain strict adherence to CSS’s Chain of 

Custody Policy in the collection of samples. 

♦ To maintain strict adherence to CSOSA’s 

Confidentiality Policy in the distribution of collection results. 

♦ To transmit offender data for effective community 

supervision case management. 

♦ To maintain monthly collection, inquiry, and test 

result for data assessment and interpretation.

♦ To testify at violation hearings on the agency’s 

quality control procedures. 

ILLEGAL SUBSTANCE UBSTANCE COLLECTION OLLECTION UNIT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

OVERVIEW MANDATE S

Each month 30,000 urine offenders undthe District of 

*based 

The ISCU utiits collection 

♦Digital B♦Digital B♦Camera ♦Orbital S♦Security ♦Oral Flu♦Tempera♦Secured 

The Illegal Substance Collection Unit (ISCU) is a major component of the Agency’s continuing efforts aimed at early detection of offenders who are using illegal substances. The quality performance of ISCU is essential to CSOSA achieving its goal of increasing public safety through a reduction in recidivism. ISCU, Branch VI, Team 35 A-D consists of a Branch Chief, four Drug Testing Operations Managers, and approximately 40 Drug Testing Technicians. 

The mission of the Illegal Substance Collection Unit is to contribute to improved public safety by ensuring integrity in the initial and ongoing phases of the drug testing process. There are four ISCU locations throughout the District of Columbia: 300 Indiana Avenue, NW Suite 2001 Phone: (202) 585-7220 3850 South Capitol Street, SE Suite 201 Phone: (202) 442-1736 1230 Taylor Street, NW Suite 112 Phone: (202) 442-1735 25 K Street, NE Suite 147 Phone: (202) 442-1320
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before HOLIFIELD , ATTANASIO, and M c COY Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Stefan M.L. JOHNSON Interior Communications Electrician Second Class (E

- 5), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 20 2300301

_________________________ Decided: 25 June 2024 Appeal from the United States Na vy - Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge : Mishonda M. Mosley
Sentence adjudged 10 October 2023 by a special court

- martial convened at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military judge s itting alone

. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : confinement for nine months and a bad

- conduct discharge. 1 For Appellant: Commander Jesse A. Schaefer , JAGC, USN

1 A ppellan t received 132 days of pretrial c onfinement c redit.United States v. Johnson , NMCCA No. 20 2300301 Opinion of the Court

2 _________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________
PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred

. 2 T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court

2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
P. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1802 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews

Document

Number: 

# 85 ) IV-E-7 9 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/4/200811:58:00 AM

Sheet 85of 117

# w P. 2 A-90-3 7 IV-E-7 9
Meetin g Note s Date : October

24 , 200 0 The purpos e ofth e meetin g wa s t o shar e view s on provision s o f afinal. N o handout s provided . Attende e lis t

attached . Attachmen tP. 3 7. 

## 'tieeUsii, S

7077 O.1.7 OfiSSOcO I /f y- - - t

Udi&cta. GsLi ./fvi* AMdri £tUoool SL...MA02LL2tfm/S.t~n]_ 

## tf^3Jc3.K. .^Md. ; 

## .a.«tAa..@..^r . LiSbpu... r /S^7^.C7.i^i^hk

-2?o.C<V/2^@. _. cJu^^ AUTDAUo7hvC£.0U-


## ~~ ~ fifimvrr7&rco@avf;7i$j- 

# :S&^mm&- ^lfcf.O&L .0£/J _ 

### O ...&$r___.. 

## ^M£ml-^iU^_%A££6f . (M j^t^h/ k LL . .. . fo> hcuc.art. R o a./.SaJS 5 

# i4&_ £ 6CX3€ / ^^l^_L...^.;k?a?.»5 . ?j_^__.^6t- - ^i'^^ - ^^^'^^.^f*^'^ '

" . Ltfi l -^Kdriors^nr^ _____SA_io 6 <L .c^dlAea* • (fcfc?_1j£:§__ l 

# a 0 / '/ ._L^?-_Lfk, . 

### iS ( 

### ..^'" : il . /^_._.<i£.\

d ^i/C^ei .

/
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2407 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2407

To suspend temporarily the duty on thermoplastic biodegradable polymer 
                                 blend.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

 Mr. Lieberman introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on thermoplastic biodegradable polymer 
                                 blend.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. THERMOPLASTIC BIODEGRADABLE POLYMER BLEND.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00         Thermoplastic      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          biodegradable                                                      31/2015
                          polymer blend
                          containing 1,4-
                          benzenedicarboxyl
                          ic acid, dimethyl
                          ester, polymer
                          with 1,4-
                          butanediol and
                          hexanedioic acid
                          (CAS No. 55231-08-
                          8 and/or 1,4-
                          benzenedicarboxyl
                          ic acid polymer
                          with 1,4
                          butanediol and
                          decanedioic acid
                          (CAS No. 28205-74-
                          5) and 1,4-
                          dioxane-2,5-
                          dione, 2,6-
                          dimethyl-(3R, 6R)-
                          polymer with rel-
                          (3R, 6S)-3,6-
                          dimethyl-1,4
                          dioxane-2,5-dione
                          and (3S, 6S)-3,6-
                          dimetyl-1,4-
                          dioxane-2,5-dione
                          (CAS No. 9051-89-
                          2) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          3913.90.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2014421EN.01001401.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 1 October 2014 — Council of the European Union v Alumina d.o.o., European Commission

(Case C-393/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Dumping - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 464/2011 - Importation of zeolite A powder originating in Bosnia and Herzegovina - Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Article 2 - Determination of the normal value - Concept of ‘ordinary course of trade’))

2014/C 421/18

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, acting as Agent, assisted initially by G.M. Berrisch and subsequently by D. Geradin, avocats)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Alumina d.o.o. (represented by: J.-F. Bellis and B. Servais, avocats), European Commission

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013.

1

---
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42974-42975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21072]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-334-001]

Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Filing of Tariff 
Sheets

August 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 31, 1997, Texas Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Gas) tendered for filing, as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1 the following tariff sheets:

Third Revised Sheet Nos. 385-389

    Texas Gas states that the instant filing contains tariff sheets to 
comply with the directives of the Commission's May 16, 1997, Order with 
respect to the Form of EDI Trading Partner Agreement. The revisions 
include language regarding confidential information, termination of 
agreements, and liability provisions. Texas Gas has requested an 
effective date of September 1, 1997, which coincides with the 
implementation by Texas Gas of EDI using the Internet electronic 
delivery mechanism.
    Texas Gas states that copies of the tariff sheets are being served 
upon Texas Gas's jurisdictional customers and interested state 
commissions, as well as all parties on the Commission's official 
service list in Docket No. RP97-334.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sec. 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Sec. 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make

[[Page 42975]]

protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the 
Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21072 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Caprius, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George Aaron,
President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ George Aaron
----------------
George Aaron
President and Chief Executive Officer


December 21, 2005
#### Clinton DUMAS, Jr. v. STATE.

2 Div. 185.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 1, 1977.

No brief for appellant.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen. and Stephen M. Langham, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State, appellee.

BOWEN W. SIMMONS, Retired Circuit Judge.

Appellant, an indigent here and below, was indicted for burglary with intent to rape, tried and convicted therefor on a plea of not guilty. He entered and withdrew a plea of insanity. The jury fixed punishment at fifteen years imprisonment.

It appears from the evidence that the victim refused to let defendant in her house at night. He then proceeded to kick the front door open, then entered and a struggle ensued, resulting in physical injuries to the victim. The res gestae was interrupted by a person on the street who entered the home in response to noises he heard. Others came over, including the sheriff. We omit further details of the State’s evidence.

Defendant testified, inter alia, that he had slept with the victim on occasions prior to the night of the difficulty and had seen her that night at the house of another person where they had been drinking intoxicating beverages. He contended that later, as he passed in front of the victim’s home, she called him and an argument ensued in the victim’s home about another woman. A fight ensued; that she grabbed a hammer, which he took away from her and hit her with the handle, thus causing bruises that bled. He denied breaking into the victim’s home and that he tried to rape her.

Suffice it is, there were conflicts in the evidence which the jury heard and resolved in favor of the State.

The attorney appointed for defendant on this appeal did not file a brief. However, we have carefully and in detail, examined the record as required by T. 15, Section 389, Recompiled Code 1958. We find no prejudicial errors of any kind.

Appellant was well represented at nisi prius by appointed counsel. It appears from the record that he got a fair trial and now cannot be heard to complain.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by the Honorable BOWEN W. SIMMONS, a retired Circuit Judge, serving as a Judge of this Court, under the provisions of Section 6.10 of the new Judicial Article (Constitutional Amendment No. 328); his opinion is hereby adopted as that of the Court.

The judgment below is hereby

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 153 (Friday, August 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21039]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 
(SAMHSA); Notice of Meetings

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings of the SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel I in August.

    A summary of the meetings and rosters of the members may be 
obtained from: Ms. Dee Herman, Committee Management Liaison, SAMHSA 
Office of Extramural Activities Review, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 17-89, 
Rockville, Maryland 20857. Telephone: 301-443-7390.
    Substantive program information may be obtained from the individual 
named as Contact for the meetings listed below.
    The meetings will include the review, discussion and evaluation of 
individual grant applications. These discussions could reveal personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications. 
Accordingly, these meetings are concerned with matters exempt from 
mandatory disclosure in Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) and 5 U.S.C. App.2, 
Sec. 10(d).

    Committee Name: SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel I (SEP I).
    Meeting Date: August 25, 1997.
    Place: Westin Hotel, 2350 M Street, NW., Dupont Room, 
Washington, DC 20037-5788.
    Closed: August 25, 1997 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Panel: Center for Mental Health Services Coalminers and Farmers 
Outreach Program.
    Contact: Ferdinand W. Hui, Ph.D., Room 17-89, Parklawn Building, 
Telephone: 301-443-9919 and FAX: 301-443-3437.

    Committee Name: SAMHSA Special Emphasis Panel I (SEP I).
    Meeting Date: August 25, 1997.
    Place: Westin Hotel, 2350 M Street, NW., Dupont Room, 
Washington, DC 20037-5788.
    Closed: August 25, 1997 9:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m.
    Panel: Center for Substance Abuse Prevention U.S.-Mexico Border 
Initiative.
    Contact: Stanley Kusnetz, M.S. Ed., Room 17-89, Parklawn 
Building, Telephone: 301-443-3042, and FAX: 301-443-3437.

    Dated: August 5, 1997.
Jeri Lipov,
Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health 
Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-21039 Filed 8-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
No. D-45.

#### In re Disbarment of Mitchell.

It is ordered that John Newton Mitchell, of New York, N. Y., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Mr. Justice Rehnquist took no part in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Order entered August 7, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00453-CR

OSCAR ALEJANDRO NAVARRO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F15-75671-Q

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s August 6, 2019 second motion to extend the time to file 

appellant’s brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or before 

September 3, 2019. If appellant’s brief is not filed by September 3, 2019, this appeal may be 

abated for the trial court to make findings in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 38.8.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
NUMBER 13

- 1 2

- 00 235

- CR



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

RICK E Y JOE FRANKS

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 3 6 th District Court

of Aransas County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Ro driguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Rick e y Joe Franks , by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to

withdraw his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

.

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to withdraw the

appeal and pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a), dismiss the appeal.2

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be

entert ained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the

17th day of May, 2012

.
**Exhibit 32.2**

AMTECH SYSTEMS, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Amtech Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bradley C. Anderson, Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| By     | /s/ Bradley   C. Anderson                                   |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                             |   |
|   | Bradley C.   Anderson                                       |   |
|   | Vice   President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   | Amtech   Systems, Inc.                                      |   |
|   | Date:   January 29, 2007                                    |   |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TYLER CHARLES SMITH,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 455 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of April, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Comdisco, Inc. and Subsidiaries                                    Exhibit 11.00

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(in millions except per share data)

Average shares used in computing earnings per common and common equivalent share
were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                   1998        1997        1996        1995         1994 
                                                  -----       -----       -----       -----        -----
<S>                                                <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>          <C>

Average shares issued                               221         220         216         214          214
Effect of dilutive options                           12          10          10           6            2
Treasury stock                                      (70)        (72)        (66)        (54)         (42)
                                                  -----       -----       -----       -----        -----
  Total                                             163         158         160         166          174
                                                  =====       =====       =====       =====        =====

Net earnings  to common stockholders              $ 151       $ 123       $ 106       $  96        $  44
                                                  =====       =====       =====       =====        =====

Net earnings per common share:
  Earnings per common share-basic                 $ .99       $ .83       $ .70       $ .60        $ .26
                                                  =====       =====       =====       =====        =====
  Earnings per common share-diluted                 .93         .78         .67         .57          .26
                                                  =====       =====       =====       =====        =====

</TABLE>

On April 22, 1998 the Board of Directors  authorized a two-for-one  split of the
Company's  common stock to be distributed on June 15, 1998, to holders of record
on May 22, 1998.  All data with respect to earnings per common share,  dividends
per common share, and weighted  average number of common shares  outstanding has
been retroactively adjusted to reflect the two-for-one split.