alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 47783.

#### Protest 36953-K of New York Mdse. Co., Inc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The testimony offered was found to fall far short of establishing that the soap boxes in question are household utensils. From the record and sample the court observed that the merchandise responds to the judicial definition of hollow ware, and so held, and inasmuch as the plaintiff did not invoke the hollow ware provision the protest was overruled without affirming the action of the collector.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed April 24, 2024.

________________

No. 3D22-1404

Lower Tribunal No. B22-14816

________________

City of Miami Beach,

Appellant,

vs.

Adalberto Cosme,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Robin W. 

Faber, Judge.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Assistant 

Attorney General; Rafael A. Paz, City Attorney, and Robert F. Rosenwald, 

Jr., Chief Deputy City Attorney, and Woody Clermont, Assistant City 

Attorney, for appellant.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Andrew Stanton, Assistant 

Public Defender, for appellee.

Before SCALES, LINDSEY, and MILLER, JJ. 
2

On Motion for Rehearing or Clarification

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration, the Appellee’s Motion for Rehearing or

Clarification, and Corrected Motion for Rehearing or Clarification are hereby 

denied. The Appellant’s Response is noted.

SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ., concur.
3

City of Miami Beach v. Adalberto Cosme

Case No. 3D22-1404

MILLER, J., dissenting from the denial of rehearing or clarification.

I respectfully dissent from the denial of rehearing or clarification. In 

reversing the case on due process grounds, the majority relies upon an 

argument advanced by the State for the first time in the reply brief. As 

appellee correctly argues, this course of action constitutes a sharp

departure from established tenets of appellate law. See Hoskins v. State,

75 So. 3d 250, 257 (Fla. 2011) (barring issue not raised in initial brief); 

Gen. Mortg. Assocs., Inc. v. Campolo Realty & Mortg. Corp., 678 So. 2d

431, 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (“The fact that this issue was raised for the 

first time in the reply brief alone precludes our consideration of the

matter.”); Land v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 181 So. 3d 1252, 1254 (Fla. 1st DCA

2015) (“[T]his court is unable to entertain appellants’ argument . . . which

they failed to raise in their initial brief.”); Plichta v. Plichta, 899 So. 2d 1283, 

1287 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (“Issues raised on appeal for the first time in a 

reply brief are not properly before this court and will not be considered.”). 

Accordingly, in my view, lack of preservation should have doomed this 

appeal to failure.
# C_2015138EN.01001702.xml

| 27.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 February 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État — France) — Les Laboratoires Servier SA v Ministre des Affaires sociales et de la Santé, Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances

(Case C-691/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Medicinal products for human use - Directive 89/105/EEC - Article 6(2) - Establishment of a list of medicinal products reimbursed by the health insurance funds - Amendment of the conditions of reimbursement of a medicinal product when renewing its inclusion in such a list - Obligation to state reasons))

(2015/C 138/22)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil d'État

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Les Laboratoires Servier SA

Applicant:

Defendant: Ministre des Affaires sociales et de la Santé, Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 6(2) of Council Directive 89/105/EEC of 21 December 1988 relating to the transparency of measures regulating the pricing of medicinal products for human use and their inclusion in the scope of national health insurance systems must be interpreted as meaning that the obligation to state reasons set out in that provision is applicable to a decision which reinstates a product in the list of medicinal products covered by the health insurance system, but which limits the reimbursement of that product to a specific category of patients.

---

(1)  OJ C 85, 22.3.2014.

1

---
No. 96-8321 (A-671).

#### Medina *v.*Florida.

Sup. Ct. Fla. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.
#### John G. Deshler, plaintiff in error *vs.*Suel Foster, defendant in error.

*Error to Muscatine.*

Where the transcript of the justice of the peace shows an appearance by attorney on a motion to quash the attachment, it will be regarded as an appearance in general, and the defendant will be estopped from a motion to dismiss the 'cause when taken to the District Court on an appeal, for the want of personal service.

This was a suit by an atlachment brought by the defendant against the plaintiff in error, before a justice of the peace. On the returnan attorney appeared for the defendant, and moved to quash the attachment for reasons filed, which was overruled. The defendants attorney then moved that the plaintiff amend his affidavit so as to insert the circumstances upon which he predicated his belief that the defendant had absented as required by law, and on the plaintiff refusing to amend, the attorney abano’oned the *case.*

*A*jury was called who returned a verdict for the defendant, and judgment was rendered against the plaintiff’for costs.

The plaintiff’appealed to the District Court, where a motion was made to dismiss the appeal, because there was no service on the defendant personally or by notice, which was overruled by the court; to which the defendant excepted.

To reverse this judgment, the defendant sued out a writ of error from this court.

Lowe, for plaintiff ¡a error.

*404Woodward, for defendant in error.

Pee Curiam,

Mason, Chief Justice.

The only error assigned in this case is, that the court below erred in overruling the motion made by the defendant to dismiss the suit, because there was no service made on the defendant below personally, or by notice. We think there was such an appearance below as to cure this defect. The transcript of the justice shows that the defendant appeared by his attorney. There is nothing to show that such appearance was for a special purpose, and although the acts of that attorney were limited to matters connected with the process of attachment, and although he left the justice’s court when he had failed to accomplish certain purposes of a preliminary character, the record shows no sufficent reason to induce us to doubt that his appearance was in the first instance general.

Judgment affirmed.
C-1

APPENDIX C

File Key for Substituted Data
C-2

A dedicated page on the VIEWS database acts as the repository of all site-specific

substitute data sets

http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/views/web/documents/substitutedata.aspx. Data is also

available on the ARS ftp site (ftp://ftp.air-resource.com/VISTAS/

Aerosol_dataset_VISTAS_2000-2004/).

Table C-1 presents a key to the substituted data files.

Table C-1

Key to Substituted Data Files 

Column Header Description

site IMPROVE site code

year

month

day

QUARTER 1 = Jan. – Mar., 2 = Apr.-Jun., 3 = Jul. – Sept., 4 = Oct. – Dec.

date

Group 10 = One of the 20% best visibility days; 90 = One of the 20% worst visibility days

good_year 0 = incomplete year, 1 = complete RHR year, 2 = complete year with substitutions

ss_rayleigh Site specific Rayleigh value (clean air extinction)

fsrh f(RH) value for small sulfate, nitrate and organic mass

flrh f(RH) value for large sulfate, nitrate and organic mass

fssrh f(RH) value for sea salt mass

Sea_Salt Sea salt mass (μg/m3)

Soil Soil Mass (μg/m3)

Amm_NO3 Ammonium nitrate mass (μg/m3)

OMC Organic mass by carbon (μg/m3)

LAC Light absorbing carbon (aka EC/Elemental Carbon) (μg/m3)

CM Coarse mass (μg/m3)

Amm_SO4 Ammonium sulfate mass (μg/m3)

Large_OMC Large organic mass (μg/m3)

Small_OMC Small organic mass (μg/m3)

Large_Amm_SO4 Large ammonium sulfate mass (μg/m3)

Small_Amm_SO4 Small ammonium sulfate mass (μg/m3)

Large_Amm_NO3 Large ammonium nitrate mass (μg/m3)

Small_Amm_NO3 Small ammonium nitrate mass (μg/m3)

EAmm_SO4 Extinction due to ammonium sulfate (Mm-1)

EAmm_NO3 Extinction due to ammonium nitrate (Mm-1)

EOMC Extinction due to organic carbon mass (Mm-1)

ELAC Extinction due to light absorbing carbon mass (Mm-1)

ESoil Extinction due to soil mass (Mm-1)

ECM Extinction due to coarse mass (Mm-1)

ESea_Salt Extinction due to sea salt mass (Mm-1)

RBext Reconstructed aerosol extinction (Mm-1)

TBext Reconstructed total extinction (Mm-1)

OC_SUB1 OC substituted using OC vs. organic H correlations

EC_SUB1 EC substituted using EC vs. OC correlations

(NH4)2SO4_SUB2 Ammonium sulfate substituted using site donor correlations

(NH4)NO3_SUB2 Ammonium nitrate substituted using site donor correlations

OM_SUB2 Organic mass substituted using site donor correlations

EC_SUB2 Elemental carbon (aka LAC/light absorbing carbon) substituted using site donor correlations

Soil_SUB2 Soil substituted using site donor correlations

CM_SUB2 Coarse mass substituted using site donor correlations

SeaSalt_SUB2 Sea salt substituted using site donor correlations
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Oil & Gas, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-QSB"),
I, Patrick D. O'Brien, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 15, 2004

/s/ Patrick D. O'Brien
----------------------
Patrick D. O'Brien
Chief Executive Officer
No. 99-7779.

#### Schreibman *v.*Holmes et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Fred E. YOUNG, Individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated v. The Hon. Lemmie O. HIGHTOWER, Judge of the Fourth Judicial District Court and the City of Monroe, et al.

No. 60218.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 8, 1977.

In re: Fred E. Young, Individually, et al., applying for supervisory writs of prohibition, mandamus and/or certiorari.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of this Court’s supervisory jurisdiction.
[LOGO] LAKELAND
       INDUSTRIES, INC.

                                            701 Koehler Avenue, Suite 7
                                            Ronkonkoma, NY 11779
                                            (631) 981-9700 - www.lakeland.com
                                                             ----------------


                 Lakeland Industries to Report Operating Results
                                for Year End FY06
                    Conference Call on Monday, April 17, 2006

RONKONKOMA, NY - April 10, 2006 -- Lakeland Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: LAKE), a
leading manufacturer of industrial protective clothing for industry,
municipalities, healthcare and to first responders on the federal, state and
local levels, will release its financial results for the year ended January 31,
2006 before the public capital markets open on Monday April 17, 2006. On the
same day, Lakeland will host a conference call at 9:00 AM (EST) to discuss the
Company's FY06 operating results.

The call will be hosted by Christopher J. Ryan, Lakeland's President and CEO and
Gary Pokrassa, Lakeland's Chief Financial Officer. Investors can listen to the
call by dialing (800)370-0898 (Domestic) or (973)409-9260 (International) and
give the Pass Code of 7252658.

For a replay of this call through April 23, dial (877)519-4471 (Domestic) or
(973)341-3080 (International) and give the Pass Code of 7252658.

For more information concerning Lakeland, please visit us at: www.lakeland.com
                                                              ----------------

"Safe Harbor" Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995: Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions as
described from time to time in Press Releases and 8-K(s), registration
statements, annual reports and other periodic reports and filings filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. All statements, other than statements of
historical facts, which address Lakeland's expectations of sources or uses for
capital or which express the Company's expectation for the future with respect
to financial performance or operating strategies can be identified as
forward-looking statements. As a result, there can be no assurance that
Lakeland's future results will not be materially different from those described
herein as "believed," "anticipated," "estimated" or "expected," which words
reflect the current view of the Company with respect to future events. We
caution readers 0-that these forward-looking statements speak only as of the
date hereof. The Company hereby expressly disclaims any obligation or
undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any such statements
to reflect any change in the Company's expectations or any change in events
conditions or circumstances on which such statement is based.
----

----

| 1.  | The      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934, as amended; and |
|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.    | The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the LP. |
|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: October      31, 2008                                                                             |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                         |   |   |
| /s/      Anthony J. Branca                                                                                   |   |   |
| Anthony      J. Branca                                                                                       |   |   |
| Chief      Financial OfficerICON      Capital Corp.General      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight BL.P. |
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  quarterly  report of  California  Clean Air, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2006 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report") the
undersigned  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: Nov 20, 2006                   /s/ STEPHEN D. WILSON
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Stephen D. Wilson
                                      Title: President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                      Secretary, Chief Financial Officer, Chief
                                      Accounting Officer, Director
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2278 

To provide for an exemption for community banks to certain escrow 

requirements under the Truth in Lending Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2012 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for an exemption for community banks to certain 

escrow requirements under the Truth in Lending Act, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ESCROW REQUIREMENTS EXEMPTION FOR 

4 COMMUNITY BANKS. 

5 Section 129D(c) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 

6 U.S.C. 1639d(c)) is amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through 

8 (4) as subparagraphs (A) through (D), respectively, 

9 and moving the margins 2 ems to the right; 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2278 IS

1 (2) by striking ‘‘The Bureau’’ and inserting the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Bureau’’; and 

4 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(2) TREATMENT OF LOANS HELD BY SMALLER

6 INSTITUTIONS.—The Bureau shall, by regulation, 

7 exempt from the requirements of subsection (a) any 

8 loan secured by a first lien on the principal dwelling 

9 of a consumer, if such loan is held by an insured de10 pository institution having assets of 

11 $10,000,000,000 or less.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 13025 

________________________________________________________________________ 

TRADE 

Competition Laws

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and ISRAEL 

Signed at Washington March 15, 1999 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 ISRAEL 

 Trade: Competition Laws 

Agreement signed at Washington March 15, 1999; 

Entered into force November 7, 2000.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board
of Directors and Stockholders
Medical Nutrition USA, Inc.

We consent to
the incorporation by reference to the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.
333-134678) of our report dated April 24, 2009, with respect to the financial
statements of Medical Nutrition USA, Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended January 31, 2009.

|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Amper,
 Politziner & Mattia, LLP
|                                    
|April 24,
 2009                     
|Hackensack,
 New Jersey             
|                                    

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Planar Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period
ended September 29, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gerald K. Perkel, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                                                  
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/    GERALD K. PERKEL                                          
|    |  | Gerald K. Perkel President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director

Date: December 12, 2006
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2329 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain direct injection fuel injectors. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 23, 2012 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain direct injection 

fuel injectors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN DIRECT INJECTION FUEL INJECTORS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2329 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Direct injection fuel injectors 

(solenoid valves) (provided for 

in subheading 8481.8090) designed to inject gasoline/ethanol fuel blends directly into 

the combustion chamber of a 

spark-ignition combustion 

piston engine in a high-pressure non-port injection system in a motor vehicle .......... 1.1% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 47690.

#### Protests 906624-G., etc., of Schear & Schrader (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, ' J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *Minami*(29 C. C. P. A. 169, C. A. D. 188), the Christmas wreaths in question were held dutiable as articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as. signs, at 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph 353, as claimed.