alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
08/27/201 0 15:3 3 FAX 202493514 2 FA A * DM S 0001/00 2 U . S , DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA L AVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N ^f^PARTMEN T O F 

### WASHINGTON , D,C . ; n/\NSPOR]AnOM • OKE T OPERATION S FA A Docket No
. CPIOCEOOO^i q 5,,- . ^- . p . -, ^ DM S No
. FAA-2010-002 5 Judge : Patric k

G
. Geraght y I N TH E MATTE R O F GOJE T AIRLINES , LL C

COMPLAINANT' S REPL Y I N OPPOSITIO N T O RESPONDENT' S MOTIO N FO RSUMMAR Y JUDGMEN T COME S NOW th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (FAA) , b y counsel , an dpursuan t t o Titl e 1 4 oflh c Cod

e o f Federa l Regulation s (CFR ) § 13.218 , fdc s thi s repl y i n oppositio n t o tht

Respondent' s motio n fo

r summar y judgmen t

filedo n Augus t

2 , 201 0 (Respondent' s motion) . 1 4 CF R§ 13.21 8 (c ) state s tha

t " apart y shal l til e an

y prehearin g motion , an dshal l serv e acopy on eac h party , not

late r tha n 3 0 day s before th e hearing. " Th e hearin g o n thi s matter i s scheadule dfo

r Augus t 25 , 2010 . Respondent' s motio n wa s file dan dserve dles s than 3 0 day s befor e th e hearing , i n violatio n of CF R§ 13.21 8 (c) , an dtherefore shoul db e denie do r reserve d fo r a n ora l preliminar

y motio n a

t hearing . Furthermore , in submittin g amotio n fo r summar y judgment , th e burde n rest s o n the moving part

y t o establis h tha t

n o factud l issue s exist . CF

R§ 13.218(f)(5 ) I n th e instan t case , th e FA A contend s tha

t th e Statement

ofUncontraverte dMateria l Fact s a s state din Respondent' s motio n i s false , unsupporte dan dmisleading . Thus , genuin e issue s o f materia l fac t

exis t an d Respondent' s motio n shoul db e denied . Datedthi s 16*

^ da y o f Augus t 201 0 Respectfully Submitted ,

A . Lester HaiTili p Regiona l Counse l /

' C " ' -•

- Davi dKessler

. '"

• '•• • < - 3 201 0 Attorne y ... . • .'=* >

" > ,•-,— ^

• • ' ' • '•-'" ! ^08/27/201 0 15:3 3 FA X 202493514 2 FA A + DM S gl002/00 2

I N TH E MATTE RO F GO.TE T AIRLINES , LLC . DM S No . FAA-2010-002 5 CERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E I hereb y certif

y tha t I hav e thi s date provide dth e origina l an don e cop y o f

th e Complainanr s Repl y i n Oppositio n t o Respondent' s Motio n fo r Summai y Judgmen t

t o th e belo w named , vi ath e Unite d iState s mail , postag e prepaid , o n Augus t 16,2010 , addresse dto : Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wright Buildin g - Suit

e 2W100 0 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n SO O Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 I n addiiion , I hereb y certif

y tha t 1 hav e thi s date provide dacop y l o tli e belo w named , vi afacsimil e transmission , an dplace din th e Unite dState s mail , postag e prepaid , o n Augus t 16 , 2010 , th e original , addresse dto : Davi dHaye s 1149 5 Natura l Bridg e Roa d Bridgeton , M O 6304 4

(facsimil e t o (314 ) 222-4314 ) The Honorabl e RichardC . Goodwin , AL.r Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave. , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , RoomE12-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0

(facsimil e t o (202 ) 366-7536 )

Davi dKessle r Aitomc y
No. 65825.

#### Healthways, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/26941, etc. (Los Angeles).

*548Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of diving masks similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 63864, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 00-6668.

#### Addleman *v.*Lehman, Secretary, Washington Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Jagged Peak, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 10, 2006
|                      | 
|By:                   |  | /s/ Andrew J. Norstrud 
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Profile..., softwood sawmills in the United States and Canada [electronic resource].**** 
1999 | 2001 | 2003 | 2005 | 2007 | 2009
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.78/2:
Item Number:0083-B-17 (online)
CGP System Number:000630592
 
 
 
 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
 
June 27, 2017******
#### STATE ex rel. Harold Lee HERBERT v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 97-KH-3144.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1998.

In re Herbert, Harold Lee; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Jefferson Davis, 31st Judicial District Court, No. CR 605-77.

Denied.

VICTORY, J., not on panel.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

           NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"),
provides that if part of a registration statement at the time it becomes
effective contains an untrue statement of a material fact, or omits a material
fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein
not misleading, any person acquiring a security pursuant to such registration
statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person
knew of such untruth or omission) may assert a claim against, among others, an
accountant who has consented to be named as having certified any part of the
registration statement or as having prepared any report for use in connection
with the registration statement.

Smith International, Inc. ("Smith") dismissed Arthur Andersen LLP ("Arthur
Andersen") on April 15, 2002 as its independent public accountants. Arthur
Andersen has ceased operations and, as such, is unable to consent to the
incorporation by reference of their previously issued audit report with respect
to Smith's financial statements as of December 31, 2001 and for the two years
ended December 31, 2001 into Smith's previously filed registration statements
File No. 33-31556, No. 33-69840, No. 33-56693, No. 333-34249, No. 333-47729, No.
333-62629, No. 333-76633, No. 333-76635, No. 333-80091, No. 333-40734, No.
333-65912 and No. 333-88918.

Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act permits Smith to
file this Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference into the above listed
registration statements, without a written consent from Arthur Andersen. As a
result, with respect to transactions in Smith securities pursuant to the
Registration Statements that occur subsequent to the date this Form 10-K is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Arthur Andersen will not have
any liability under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for any untrue
statements of a material fact contained in the financial statements audited by
Arthur Andersen or any omissions of a material fact required to be stated
therein. Accordingly, investors would be unable to assert a claim against Arthur
Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act.
No. 39269.

#### Protest 841961-G of W. X. Huber Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is similar to that covered by *Borgfeldt*v. *United States*(T. D. 48585). The claim at 33)4 percent under paragraph 412 was therefore sustained.
#### Myrtis R. Gilley BRADFORD, natural tutrix of Donald R. Gilley v. J. RAY McDERMOTT & CO. et al.

No. 60453.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 27, 1977.

In re: Myrtis R. Gilley applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St. Mary. 347 So.2d 1218.

Writ denied.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Michael A. Reisner, Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
      Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of ICON Capital Corp.,
      the General Partner of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly Report
      of
      ICON Income Fund Eight B L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q/A for the period
      ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the Partnership.








*Dated:
      December 11, 2007*





*/s/Michael A. Reisner*


Michael
      A. Reisner


Director,
      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the General
      Partner


(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


General
      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight B L.P.
toms and
tection

x WeHHOCTeli

Tipn nnose w Cocannémmue rans 1 epmose 13 Coeannénmax Uraron pasp

nepeMemtenne (nepeno3ka, nepecbitka) mOGoll CYMMBL B RAIOTE WIM B HHBIX sleHeAHEIX

OKBHRAIEHTAX, QswaKO, ECM BI 3a OH pas NepeMemaere, bITaeTeC NepeMecTItTE
iam oGecnesurrs Takoe HepeMeuIcHHE (B TOM ‘HEE HO MONTE HAL MAKIN CpescTRAMH!)
BAMOTH WWI HMBIX ARHEKHLX oKBHBAIENTOR, OGULAR CYNMA KOTOPHX mpeseamiaer
10 Ta1ea4 zos17apor CLA (i014 paBHyro cysMy B HHOcTpAHHO! Bastore), #3 CoesHHEHHBIX
Ulratos & mo6yio unyio crpany wit 8 Cocamméuunte Lrarsi 13 su0Goit molt crpauti,
Bu oGarann nogare ektapauno 06 2roM w Tanoxkeuno-norpauiuyio caya6y CLA
(U.S. Customs and Border Protection). Sror aoxymenr nasuinaeres «lexsrapanus
© MeayHapoaHOM MepeMellleHHH BATIOTHI H JIeHEKHBIX 9kBHRAIeHTORY (SbopMta FinCEN
Form 105). Kpoae toro, opmy FinCEN Form 105 ceayer raxxke nozasars, ca Bot
noayuna 8 Cocamnénnx Lfrarax pasoxyio siinuiary 8 BauoTe Hm HMBIX jeHeAHEIX
oKBHBALTeHTAX, OGillag CyMNa KoTOpOIt MpeBLnaeT 1O-TEIeR slosTapoB CILLA (11H pasayyro
MMY B MHOCTpaHHOl! BANOTe), KaKOBAR ABITLTATA Gotta MpHHeIeHa, MpHcTaHa No Mose
orpyxena 8 Bau apec 13 oGolt muoit crpanbi. uaa orofi jekapauiH MoxKHO
noayurrn B sm0G0M HorpaiinioM nyHKre Buea 2 CLA wm aes aurrepiera io
cconke www.fincen.gov'fin!05_cmirpaf.

K actexxubim 9kBuBateHTan orHocsTes:
1) Moneta u aeweamie saxut (Gankworss) CHA 1 apyrux rocysapers;
2) Aoporxrnue HeKn w m1060H opme;
3) Murarékuibte AOKYMeHTHI (B TOM HICHIE HeKH, BeKCeNH H Opslepa

npowspecTH nepeaayy ZeHexHBIX CyMM apyTOMY AIL

‘unene exit, RexCeas 1 opsepa
ogHHCAH!, HO B KOTOPHIX He ykasaHO HM H dant
HaMeHoRanHe nostysaress

{CKHBIX HepeHOOB), KOTOPEIE

KYMAFH H AKLINH, BHINHCAMHBIe Ha HpeAbABHETEN HIM
e MEIN OGpasos, NOsBONSOULIM UpoHsBECTHL
cya sipyroMy sunty.

Onuaxo 8 nonsTHe qeHektBiil 9KBHRALE!
1) sexi opaepa aeHexcx nepesoxios, BuuncaMMBe Ha
onpeexéuHoe nounentonantioe smo, He MmuTOCCHPOBAMHBE HIE
Mnefontne HaANHeH, OrpanneinEaoUUe HAAOCeHpORAHHE,

2) ckaraekie pacniekn H eksrateKHe cBty

3) xowocamenrut u tpaxcnopramte Hakan

Jlewsapnporanne saaseres TpeGowanitem 3axonia 0G oTYérHOCTH nO BaNOTHBIM
1 MexuyHapostbim onepauuam (PL 97-258, 31 U.S.C
i AonouMeHaMH. HencnoaNenue 9T0ro TpeGosaHus MOxET UpuBeCTH K rpaxctaNcKo-
MpaBOBBIM CAHKIUNAM 1 YrOTOBHOMY MpecsleRoBAHHO, a TakAE K KOHpHeKanHH Bansx
EHEKHBIX CPeCTR HX IKBHIBATEHTOR,

I, et seq.) © usewenmanin

Tynxrit Tamoxenno-norpanmnoii cayat6u CLA npunesenut no ceuuixe
www.cbp.gov/xp/egovitoolbox/ports

Tanoxeutio-norpannsiias eaysx6a CHA - U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Washington, D.C. 20229

TIC: OXPAHSIEM [PAHHILbI AMEPHKH

Tipocum nocerurs neGeaitr Tamoxcenno-norpanitunioil exyax6ut CIA www.cbp.gov

CBP Publication No, 0000-0503, Revised June 2006
Russian

&
# C_2015016EN.01000601.xml

| 19.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 November 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo No 4 de Oviedo — Spain) — Mario Vital Pérez v Ayuntamiento de Oviedo

(Case C-416/13) (1)

(References for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Equal treatment in employment and occupation - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 21 - Directive 2000/78/EC - Articles 2(2), 4(1) and 6(1) - Discrimination on grounds of age - National provision - Condition of recruitment of local police officers - Fixing of a maximum age of 30 - Justification)

(2015/C 016/07)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 4 de Oviedo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Mario Vital Pérez

Defendant: Ayuntamiento de Oviedo

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 2(2), 4(1) and 6(1)(c) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which sets the maximum age for recruitment of local police officers at 30 years.

---

(1)  OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 5, 2017

No. 04-17-00558-CV

KONARK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 

Appellant (Cross- Appellee),

v.

BTX SCHOOLS, INC. and Basis Schools 

Appellees (Cross- Appellants),

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-CI-01954

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was due to be filed with this court on November 30, 2017. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 35.1. After the record’s due date, the Bexar County District Clerk notified this court 

that Appellant has not paid the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and Appellant is not entitled 

to a free clerk’s record.

We ORDER Appellant to provide written proof to this court within TEN DAYS of the 

date of this order that (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay 

the clerk’s fee, or (2) Appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. See id. R. 

20.1.

If Appellant fails to respond as ordered, this appeal will be dismissed for want of 

prosecution. See id. R. 37.3(b).

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of December, 2017.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
No. 99-7758.

#### Daniels v. United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### Ex parte John Lowell WOOD, alias.

SC 2523.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 3, 1977.

BEATTY, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, FAULKNER and SHORES, JJ., concur.
SCPW-13-0005642
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent,

vs. DeWITT LONG, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CR. NO. 12-1-1613)
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (By : R eck ten wal d, C.J ., Nak aya ma, Ac oba , M cKe nna , a nd Pol lac k, JJ. )

Upon consideration of petitioner DeWitt Long’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed on November 25, 2013, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that petitioner has alternative means to seek relief and presents no special reason for this court to invoke its jurisdiction at this time. See Oili v. Chang, 57 Haw. 411, 412, 557 P.2d 787, 788 (1976) (the supreme court “will not exercise its original jurisdiction in habeas corpus proceedings when relief is available in a lower court and no special reason exists for invoking its jurisdiction”). Accordingly, Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-13-0005642 13-FEB-2014 08:05 AM2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied without prejudice.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, February 13, 2014. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack
#### CITY OF LAFAYETTE v. J. C. MAGNON.

No. 60517.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 14, 1977.

In re: J. C. Magnon applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order, City Court of Lafayette, Lafayette Parish.

Writs denied.
Exhibit
      99.1










Contact:
      Stewart E. McClure, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer (908) 630-5000;
      Gerard Riker, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer







**SOMERSET
      HILLS BANCORP ANNOUNCES CHANGE IN PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANTS**





*BERNARDSVILLE,
      NEW JERSEY, APRIL 5, 2006* ...Somerset
      Hills Bancorp (NASDAQ Capital Market: SOMH and SOMHW) announced today that
      effective March 30, 2006, the Company dismissed KPMG LLP and appointed Crowe
      Chizek and Company LLC as its principal accountants.




KPMG’s
      audit reports on the Company’s financial statements as of and for the fiscal
      years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 did not contain an adverse
      opinion, disclaimer of opinion, or qualification or modification as to
      uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.




Somerset
      Hills Bancorp is a bank holding company formed in January 2001 to own all of
      the
      common stock of Somerset Hills Bank, a full service commercial bank with offices
      in Bernardsville, Mendham, Morristown, and Summit, New Jersey. It has announced
      plans to open three additional offices in Madison, Stirling and Long Valley.
      Somerset Hills Bank focuses its lending activities on small to medium sized
      businesses, high net worth individuals, professional practices, and consumer
      and
      retail customers. The Bank operates a licensed mortgage company subsidiary,
      Sullivan Financial Services, Inc. and also operates Somerset Hills Wealth
      Management Services, LLC., a wholly owned subsidiary licensed to provide
      financial services including financial planning, insurance (life, health,
      property and casualty), mutual funds and annuities for individuals and
      commercial accounts, and Somerset Hills Title Group, LLC, which, with its
      partner, Property Title Group, provides title services in connection with the
      closing of real estate transactions. The common stock of the Company is traded
      on NASDAQ under the symbol SOMH and the Company’s warrants to purchase common
      stock are traded on NASDAQ under the symbol SOMHW. You can visit our website
      at
      www.somersethillsbank.com.
#### Ex Parte STATE of Alabama, ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS. In re STATE of Alabama v. McELRATH FARMS, INC.

SC 2290.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 3, 1977.

Rehearing Denied June 24, 1977.

Richard H. Gill and Arthur J. Reid, Gen. Counsel, State of Ala. Industrial Relations Dept., Montgomery, for petitioner.

Richard F. Allen and Henry C. Barnett, Jr., Montgomery, for respondent.

*258MADDOX, Justice.

We granted certiorari to review a decision of the Court of Civil Appeals which allowed an employer rehire credit under Alabama’s Unemployment Compensation law. The facts are set out in the opinion of that court and will not be restated here. See *State of Alabama v. McElrath Farms, Inc.,*Ala.Civ.App., 348 So.2d 252 (1976).

The Court of Civil Appeals decided a similar case involving rehire credit on the same day this case was released in *State of Alabama v. Clegg Manufacturing Co., Inc.,*Ala.Civ.App., 348 So.2d 249 )1976), Writ quashed, Ala., 348 So.2d 252 (1977). In that case, however, the Court of Civil Appeals denied Clegg’s claim for rehire credit. Except for the fact that in *McElrath*a telephone call was made prior to, but not within the 45-day period set out in the statute, the facts are essentially the same. In both instances, the employer laid off numerous employees and in neither case did the employer “allege” in writing *within the time periods*set out in the statute that the laid-off employees had been re-employed. McElrath concedes that the telephone call was not made within either of the 45-day periods set out in the rehire credit statute. In view of this concession, we find that the Court of Civil Appeals erred in finding McElrath complied with the statute.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER, JONES, ALMON, SHORES, EMBRY and BEATTY, JJ., concur.