alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 152 (Thursday, August 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20785]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry


Notice of Meeting

    The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Expert Workshop Regarding Medical Monitoring in Bunker 
Hill, Idaho.
    Times and Dates: 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m., August 19, 1997. 8:30 a.m.-5 
p.m., August 20, 1997.
    Place: Kellogg Middle School Library, 800 Bunker Avenue, 
Kellogg, Idaho 83837, telephone 208/784-1348.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available. 
The meeting room accommodates approximately 100 people.
    Purpose: Target population(s) of residents and workers in and 
surrounding the former Bunker Hill lead and zinc smelting facility 
in Idaho have received past exposures to lead (and possibly other 
heavy metals).
    The exposures have decreased markedly, but studies show adverse 
health outcomes in these populations, most probably as a result of 
the past exposures. The literature supports an association between 
known adverse health outcomes and lead exposure.
    ATSDR wants to determine if there is a definable population at 
significantly increased risk of disease who may benefit from a 
medical monitoring program. ATSDR will judge the appropriateness of 
such a program by applying its medical monitoring criteria. If a 
program is deemed appropriate, the agency will develop a medical 
monitoring plan for the target population(s). ATSDR is planning 
three workshops consisting of external experts to provide individual 
input and guidance about applying the medical monitoring criteria to 
Bunker Hill. This announcement is for the first workshop; all three 
workshops will be open to the public.
    Matters To Be Considered: The objective of the first workshop is 
to use all available information from ATSDR and other relevant data 
to make individual recommendations and answer questions related to 
the application of the first four ATSDR medical monitoring criteria 
at Bunker Hill, definition of the target populations, and specific 
outcomes as candidates for monitoring. Community and local health 
representatives and nationally recognized lead experts will convene 
to consider the first four ATSDR Medical Monitoring Criteria as they 
apply to Bunker Hill.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Vivian Rush, M.D., Medical 
Officer, ATSDR-Division of Health Education and Promotion, 1600 
Clifton Road, NE, M/S E-33, Atlanta, Georgia 30333; telephone 404/
639-5080.

    Dated: August 1, 1997.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 97-20785 Filed 8-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-70-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         386,639
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  711,766
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (154,554)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,475,146
<PP&E>                                       1,507,841
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,246,378)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,613,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,329,065
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        5,792,787
<PREFERRED>                                  1,710,347
<COMMON>                                        94,040
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,613,031
<SALES>                                        235,138
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,681,076
<CGS>                                          134,305
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,977,061
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,598
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (294,664)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)


</TABLE>
Grants Reporting and Tracking System Forestry Data Pull

MEMORANDUM

DATE: June 8, 2016

TO: Record for EPA-HQ-OW-2015-0668

CC: Prasad Chumble, USEPA

FROM: Chris Solloway, USEPA

SUBJECT: Query description for Excel sheet of 319 Projects

Queries were extracted from projects meeting the following conditions:

(1) Projects were awarded between Award Fiscal Year 2002 and 2016 (data quality is less certain 

prior to 2002; last 6 years are subject to some modification moving forward—these are live files, 

and not all grants are closed out)

(2) Project Status is NOT equal to: Discontinued, Never Initiated; Not Initiated

(3) The source category of pollution is “Silviculture”

a. AND the BMPs implemented include: Access Roads, Forest Trails and Landings; 

Recreation Trails & Walkways, or Road Ditch Creation/Improvements

(4) OR The source category of pollution is: Agriculture, Construction, Hydromodification, or Other 

NPS Pollution

a. AND the secondary/sub category of pollution is: Forest Management, Road 

Construction/Maintenance, Streambank/Shoreline Modification/Destabilization
<PAGE>   1
                       [RYDER SCOTT COMPANY LETTERHEAD]


                        CONSENT OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY


           We consent to the use on the form 10-K of Sterling Gas Drilling Fund
1983-1 of our reserve report and all schedules, exhibits, and attachments 
thereto incorporated by reference of Form 10-K and to any reference made to 
us on Form 10-K as a result of such incorporation.


                                        Very Truly Yours,

                                        /s/ Ryder Scott Company
                                            Petroleum Engineers

                                        RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                        PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


Denver, Colorado
March 11, 1996
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1658

REGINALD D. EVANS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LOUIS CALDERA, Secretary of the United States Army, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph R. McCrorey, Magistrate Judge. (CV-99-865-17-BC) Submitted: September 16, 2002 Decided: October 8, 2002 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reginald D. Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). 2 PER CURIAM: Reginald E. Evans appeals the magistrate judge’s order * granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate j udge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. SeeEvans v. Caldera , No. CV-99-865-17-BC (D.S.C. filed May 29, 2002, entered May 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41401-41402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20329]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Meetings

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Advisory Neurological Disorders and Stroke Council and its 
subcommittee. These meetings will be open to the public as indicated 
below. Attendance by the public will be limited to space available.
    The meetings will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 
552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. and sec. 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, for the 
review, discussion and evaluation of individual grant applications. 
These applications and discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Summaries of meetings, rosters of committee members, and other 
information pertaining to the meetings can be obtained from the 
Executive Secretary. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact the Executive Secretary.

    Name of Committee: The Planning Subcommittee of the National 
Advisory Neurological Disorders and Stroke Council.
    Date: September 10, 1997.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 1, Wilson Hall,, 
9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Closed: 1:30 p.m.-recess.

    Name of Committee: National Advisory Neurological Disorders and 
Stroke Council.
    Date: September 11-12, 1997.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 1, Wilson Hall; 
8A28, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Open: September 11, 8:30 a.m.-recess.
    Agenda: A report by the Director, NINDS; a report by the 
Director, Division of Extramural Activities, NINDS; a scientific 
presentation by an NINDS grantee; and discussion of Institute 
policies.
    Closed: September 12, 8:30 a.m.-adjournment.
    Executive Secretary: Constance W. Atwell, Ph.D., Director, 
Division of Extramural Activities, NINDS, National Institute of 
Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, Telephone: (301) 496-9248.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.853, Clinical 
Research

[[Page 41402]]

Related to Neurological Disorders; No. 93.854, Biological Basis 
Research in the Neuroscience)

    Dated: July 28, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-20329 Filed 7-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
NUMBER 13-15-00238-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE GEORGE SIMO

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

Relator, George Simo, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on 

May 22, 2015. Through this original proceeding, relator seeks to compel the trial court 

to: (1) vacate a September 11, 2014 order excluding evidence; (2) vacate an April 22, 

2015 order granting partial summary judgment; and (3) grant relator’s plea to the 

jurisdiction. 

 

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not 

required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
2

To be entitled to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus, the relator must 

show that the trial court committed a clear abuse of discretion for which the relator has 

no adequate remedy at law. In re Frank Motor Co., 361 S.W.3d 628, 630 (Tex. 2012) 

(orig. proceeding); In re Olshan Found. Repair Co., LLC, 328 S.W.3d 883, 887 (Tex. 

2010) (orig. proceeding); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 

2004) (orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex. 1992) (orig. 

proceeding). The relator has the burden of establishing both prerequisites to mandamus 

relief. In re CSX Corp., 124 S.W.3d 149, 151 (Tex. 2003) (orig. proceeding). This burden 

is a heavy one. Id.; Canadian Helicopters Ltd. v. Wittig, 876 S.W.2d 304, 305 (Tex. 1994) 

(orig. proceeding). 

A trial court abuses its discretion if it reaches a decision so arbitrary and 

unreasonable that it amounts to a clear and prejudicial error of law or if it clearly fails to 

correctly analyze or apply the law. In re Olshan Found. Repair Co., LLC, 328 S.W.3d at 

888; Walker, 827 S.W.2d at 840. The second requirement for mandamus relief, that the 

relator has no adequate remedy by appeal, “has no comprehensive definition” and is 

decided on a case-by-case basis. See In re Ford Motor Co., 165 S.W.3d 315, 317 (Tex. 

2005) (orig. proceeding) (citing In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d at 136). 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus 

and the applicable law, is of the opinion that relator has not met his burden to obtain 

mandamus relief. See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d at 135–36. 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

26th day of May, 2015.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael K. STRAHAN.

No. 60311.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 21, 1977.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for remedial writs

Writ granted. The reasons assigned by the trial judge for his ruling are incorrect. After claiming his legal rights, a defendant may change his mind, waive his rights, and make a voluntary statement. See *State v. Peevy,*La., 321 So.2d 324 (1975); *State v. Law,*214 Kan. 643, 522 P.2d 320; *Michigan v. Mosley,*423 U.S. 96, 96 S.Ct. 321, 46 L.Ed.2d 313 (1975). Moreover, we do not interpret the affidavit, the sole basis for the ruling, as an immediate request for counsel. Hence, we reverse the ruling and remand the case to the trial court for reconsideration of the question of whether the statement was freely and voluntarily made after a waiver of *Miranda*rights based on all the evidence.

SUMMERS, J., concurs, on the sole basis that the ruling of the trial judge is erroneous and should be reversed.
#### Eleanor SIMPSON, Appellant, v. Donald M. SIMPSON, et al. Appellees.

No. 97-1436.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Aug. 14, 1998.

Robert J. Shapiro, of Holland & Knight, LLP, Tampa, for Appellant.

Elizabeth C. Wheeler, of Elizabeth C. Wheeler, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm because we conclude that appellant’s record activity in the other cases did not constitute good cause why this case should remain pending in light of its lack of prosecution for more than one year.1

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, C.J., and COBB and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

1

. Appellant's remaining claims of error were not preserved and are without merit.
No. 96-1239.

#### Nunes *v.*Florida Bar.

Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.
No. 99-7880.

#### Davis *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20389]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 97N-0201]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request; Extension; Reopening of Comment Period

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing a 
reopening of the comment period on the proposed collection of certain 
information by the agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 
Federal agencies are required to publish notice in the Federal Register 
concerning each proposed collection of information, including each 
proposed extension or reopening of an existing collection of 
information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the 
notice. The notice is reopening the comment period for a data 
collection effort consisting of consumer surveys regarding preferences 
for, and comprehension of information contained in different formats 
and methods for communication in over-the-counter (OTC drug labels), 
studies C and D.

DATES: Submit written comments on the collection of information studies 
C and D by September 30, 1997.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments of information for studies C and D 
to the Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug 
Administration, 12420 Parklawn Dr., rm. 1-23, Rockville, MD 20857, 
ATTN: OTC Drug Labeling Data Collection. All comments should be 
identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of 
this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denver Presley, Office of Information 
Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 
Fishers Lane, rm. 16B-19, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1472.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of May 23, 1997 (62 
FR 28482), FDA published a notice soliciting comments on a data 
collection effort consisting of four consumer surveys regarding 
preferences for, and comprehension of information contained in 
different formats and methods for communication in over-the-counter 
(OTC) drug labels. To give interested persons additional time to submit 
comments on the proposed data collection for studies C and D. The 
agency is reopening the comment period for studies C and D only until 
September 30, 1997.

    Dated: July 28, 1997.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 97-20389 Filed 7-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20618]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #2971]


State of Louisiana

    Plaquemines and Jefferson Parishes and the contiguous Parishes of 
Lafourche, Orleans, St. Bernard, and St. Charles in the State of 
Louisiana constitute a disaster area as a result of damages caused by 
severe thunderstorms, rain, and tornadoes produced by Hurricane Danny 
on July 17 and 18, 1997. Applications for loans for physical damage may 
be filed until the close of business on September 25, 1997 and for 
economic injury until the close of business on April 27, 1998 at the 
address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small 
Business Administration, Disaster Area 3 Office, 4400 Amon Carter 
Blvd., Suite 102, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:                                                    
  Homeowners with credit available elsewhere..................     8.000
  Homeowners without credit available elsewhere...............     4.000
  Businesses with credit available elsewhere..................     8.000
  Business and non-profit organizations without credit                  
   available elsewhere........................................     4,000
  Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit               
   available elsewhere........................................     7.250
For Economic Injury:                                                    
  Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without                
   credit available elsewhere.................................     4.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 297108 
for economic injury the number is 956500.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.

    Dated: July 25, 1997.
Aida Alvarez,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-20618 Filed 8-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Memry Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on September 26, 2005 (the Report), I, James G. Binch, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ James. G. Binch                                 
|James G. Binch President and Chief Executive Officer



Dated: September 26, 2005



This certification is made solely for
the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Shareef COUSIN.

No. 98-KK-3197.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 6, 1999.

In re Cousin, Shareef; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “F”, No. 376-479; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 98KW-2413.

Denied.

JOHNSON, J., would grant the writ and remand to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing.

KNOLL, J., not on panel.
Polk Power Station 2-5 Conversion ProjectSimple Cycle Units 2-5 Supplemental NO2Dispersion Modeling FilesDirectory No. of Files FileName Name File DescriptionRECEPTOR 1 POLK_UNIT 2.ROU AERMOD Receptor File; Significant ImpactsSubtotal files 1ANNUAL IMPACTS 5 SCFO_ANN_NO2SIL_YY.INPAERMOD Input File; Simple Cycle Annual NO2SIL Analysis; ULSD Fuel Oil5 SCFO_ANN_NO2SIL_YY.OUTAERMOD Output File; Simple Cycle Annual NO2SIL Analysis; ULSD Fuel OilYY = 06 - 10Subtotal files 101-HOUR NO2SIL 1 SCFO_1HNO2SIL.INPAERMOD Input File; Simple Cycle 1-Hour NO2SIL Analysis; ULSD Fuel Oil1 SCFO_1HNO2SIL.OUTAERMOD Output File; Simple Cycle 1-Hour NO2SIL Analysis; ULSD Fuel OilCumulative 1 SC12_1HNO2SIL.INPAERMOD Input File; Simple Cycle 1-Hour NO2Cumulative Analysis; ULSD Fuel Oil1 SC12_1HNO2SIL.OUTAERMOD Output File; Simple Cycle 1-Hour NO2Cumulative Analysis; ULSD Fuel Oil1 SC12_1HNO2SIL.MAXAERMOD Output File; Simple Cycle 1-Hour NO2Cumulative Analysis; ULSD Fuel OilSubtotal files 5Total Files 16Source: ECT, 2013.Supp
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/18 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL