Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 155 / Tuesday, August 12, 1997 / Notices 43159

1 18 CFR 385.213(d). See also 18 CFR 385.202.

2 18 CFR 2.1(a)(1)(iii)(J).

Light Company, and American Electric

Power Service Corporation

(Transmission Customer), dated as of

June 24, 1997 (TSA). Duke states that

the TSA sets out the transmission

arrangements under which Duke will

provide the Transmission Customer firm

point-to-point transmission service

under Duke’s Pro Forma Open Access

Transmission Tariff. Duke requests that

the Agreement be made effective as of

June 24, 1997.

Comment date: August 20, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

17. Consolidated Edison Company of

New York, Inc.

[Docket No. ER97–3785–000]

Take notice that on July 21, 1997,

Consolidated Edison Company of New

York, Inc. (Con Edison), tendered for

filing a service agreement to provide

non-firm transmission service pursuant

to its Open Access Transmission Tariff

to Market Responsive Energy, Inc.

Con Edison states that a copy of this

filing has been served by mail upon

Market Responsive Energy, Inc.

Comment date: August 20, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraph

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Rules 211

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions

or protests should be filed on or before

the comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–21251 Filed 8–11–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Project No. 2016–029]

City of Tacoma, Washington; Notice

Establishing Comment Period for

Complaint

August 6, 1997.

On May 22, 1997, the Friends of the

Cowlitz and CPR-Fish filed a document

entitled ‘‘Complaint for Noncompliance

with Hydroelectric License.’’ The

complainants request, pursuant to 18

CFR 385.206 of the Commission’s

regulations, that the Commission find

the City of Tacoma to be in violation of

its license for the Cowlitz River Project

No. 2016, because of its alleged failure

to maintain the number of adult fish

returns as required by license Articles

37 and 57. Complainants also request

that the Commission conduct a formal

investigation of this matter in

accordance with 18 CFR Part 1B; order

a prompt hearing conducted on the

record by a presiding officer under 18

CFR Part 385, Subpart E; enter a

decision declaring Tacoma in violation

of its license and require Tacoma to take

certain specific actions to remedy its

past and continuing license violations;

and assess a civil penalty under 18 CFR

Part 385, Subpart O, for each day

Tacoma’s alleged violations of the

license continue.

Pursuant to Rule 213(d) of the

Commission’s regulations, answers to

complaints are due within 30 days after

filing or, if noticed, after publication of

the notice in the Federal Register,

unless otherwise ordered.1 In general,

the Commission’s policy is to publish

notice in the Federal Register of

complaints against hydroelectric

licensees.2

Any person may file an answer,

comments, protests, or a motion to

intervene with respect to the complaint

in accordance with the requirements of

the Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18

CFR 385.210, 385.211, 385.213, and

385.214. In determining the appropriate

action to take with respect to the

complaint, the Commission will

consider all protests or other comments

filed, but only those who file a motion

to intervene in accordance with the

Commission’s Rules may become a

party to the proceeding. Any answers,

comments, protests, or motions to

intervene must be received no later than

30 days after publication of this notice

in the Federal Register.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–21218 Filed 8–11–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[FRL–5873–5]

Agency Information Collection

Activities Under OMB Review; New

Source Performance Standards for

Secondary Brass and Bronze

Production Plants

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In compliance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

3501 et seq.), this notice announces that

the following Information Collection

Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the

Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) for review and approval:

Standards of Performance for Secondary

Brass and Bronze Production Plants

(NSPS subpart M), OMB Control

Number 2060–0110, expiration date:

September 30, 1997. The ICR describes

the nature of the information collection

and its expected burden and cost; where

appropriate, it includes the actual data

collection instrument.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on

or before September 11, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR A COPY

CALL: Sandy Farmer at EPA, (202) 260–

2740, and refer to EPA ICR No. 1604.05.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Title: Standards of Performance for

Secondary Brass and Bronze Production

Plants (OMB Control No. 2060–0110;

EPA ICR No. 1604.05, expiring

September 30, 1997. This is a request for

an extension of a currently approved

ICR.

Abstract: Secondary brass and bronze

production plants emit metallic

particulate matter in quantities that the

Administrator believes cause or

contribute to air pollution that may

reasonably be anticipated to endanger

public health or welfare. Consequently,

New Source Performance Standards for

secondary brass and bronze production

plants were promulgated. Affected

facilities are required to meet total

particulate emission limits as well as

opacity limits. Owners or operators

must conduct initial performance tests

to verify compliance with the standards,

and maintain records of all startup,

shutdown, and malfunction events. In