alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2413 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain plastic lamp-holder 

housings. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

plastic lamp-holder housings. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PLASTIC LAMP-HOLDER HOUSINGS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.29 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 lamp-holder housings of plastic, containing sockets) is 

7 amended by striking the date in the effective period col8 umn and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2413 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**-  Southern Plains  
-  Las Cruces, NM 
-  Range Management Research 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search  UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">		You are here: 						Research / 																				**Research Project:**Interactions of Climate Change and Other Environmental Factors on Invasive Plant Infestation in the Arid West
**Location: Range Management Research**
**2007 Annual Report**
**1a.Objectives (from AD-416)**													Establish, maintain, and oversee of research facilities and research field sites in connection with the project.  Provide USGS results of this work for publication and use in connection with related work.						
**1b.Approach  (from AD-416)**													Establish research plots, maintaining plot fences, performing planting and watering tasks, applying soil treatments as needed, and performing other field and lab tasks as required.						
**3.Progress Report**													This report serves to document research conducted under a reimbursable agreement between ARS and the United States Geological Survey.  Additional details of research can be found in the report for the parent CRIS, 6235-11210-005-00D, Technologies for Management of Arid Rangelands.  In FY 2007, we completed modifications of the Rangeland Database necessary to address US Department of Interior post-fire monitoring objectives.  Results were communicated at a national professional meeting, and the database is available on the Jornada Experimental Range website.						
    Project TeamHerrick, Jeffrey  - *Jeff* 
Project Annual Reports FY 2009 FY 2008 FY 2007 Publications  Publications 
Related National Programs Rangeland, Pasture, and Forages(215)  							Last Modified: 05/10/2010 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 1 1

- 00 272

- CR
IN RE Ricardo CUMMINGS Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: May 11, 2011
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On April 11, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining of the trial
court’s failure to rule on various pro se motions. However, counsel has been appointed to represent relator in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court fo r which he is currently confined. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Robinson v. State , 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State , 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). A trial court has no legal duty to rule on pro se motions or petitions filed with regard to a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is represented by counsel. See Robinson , 240 S.W.3d at 922. Consequently, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to rule

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. CM961299 , pending in the 226 th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Sid L. Harle presiding.04

- 11

- 00272

- CR

- 2

- on r elator’s pro se motions filed in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8( a). Additionally, relator filed an Application for Leave to File Petition for Writ of
Mand amus. No leave is required to file a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. T EX

. R.
A PP

. P . 52. Therefore, relator’s motion for leave to file is DENIED as moot.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
No. 00-794.

#### Ahuja *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
#### Kenneth RUSE, Jr., Appellant, v. Charlene RUSE, Appellee.

No. EE-343.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 28, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 16, 1977.

Charles Ruse, Jr., in pro. per.

John E. Futch, Ocala, for appellant.

Richard W. Withers of Becks & Becks, Daytona Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of an award of $4,000 as lump sum alimony as ordered in a final judgment in a dissolution of marriage proceeding in which the experienced and able trial judge specifically found “that the husband is able to pay the same”. The final judgment here sought to be reversed is fully sustained by this court’s opinion in *Brown v. Brown,*300 So.2d 719 (Fla.1st DCA 1974) which, unless and until receded from by this court constitutes a binding precedent on the trial court as well as this court. The final judgment appealed is therefore

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, J., concur.

MILLS, J., dissents.

MILLS, Judge,

dissenting:

I dissent.

I would reverse because Ms. Ruse failed to prove her need for alimony and failed to prove the ability of Mr. Ruse to pay her alimony.

Ms. Ruse’s testimony that she did not need alimony was unrebutted. At the time of the final hearing, Ms. Ruse was earning $12,000.00 a year and Mr. Ruse was earning less than $5,000.00 a year.

I would reverse on authority of *Hackney v. Hackney,*324 So.2d 179 (Fla.4th DCA 1975).
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Joseph Sciacca, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Halifax Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) (Intentionally omitted);c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         Date:      7/6/07 /s/ Joseph Sciacca   Joseph Sciacca   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results
of operations of the Company for the period indicated.
 Dated:  November 13, 2009/s/ G. Anthony EppolitoG. Anthony EppolitoVice President and Chief Financial Officer
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1231 

To amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to 

modify provisions relating to the National Fund for Excellence in American Indian Education. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 14, 2005 

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself and Mr. DORGAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to modify provisions relating to the National 

Fund for Excellence in American Indian Education. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Fund for Ex5 cellence in American Indian Education Amendments Act 

6 of 2005’’. 
2 

•S 1231 IS

1 SEC. 2. NATIONAL FUND FOR EXCELLENCE IN AMERICAN 

2 INDIAN EDUCATION. 

3 Section 501 of the Indian Self-Determination and 

4 Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 458bbb) is amend5 ed— 

6 (1) in subsection (g), by striking paragraphs 

7 (1) and (2) and inserting the following: 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The officers of the Founda9 tion shall be— 

10 ‘‘(A) a chief operating officer, to be ap11 pointed in accordance with paragraph (2); and 

12 ‘‘(B) any other officers, to be appointed or 

13 elected in accordance with the constitution and 

14 bylaws of the Foundation. 

15 ‘‘(2) CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER.— 

16 ‘‘(A) APPOINTMENT.—The Board shall ap17 point a chief operating officer to the Founda18 tion. 

19 ‘‘(B) REQUIREMENTS.—The chief oper20 ating officer of the Foundation shall— 

21 ‘‘(i) demonstrate experience and 

22 knowledge in matters relating to— 

23 ‘‘(I) education, in general; and 

24 ‘‘(II) education of Indians, in 

25 particular; and 
3 

•S 1231 IS

1 ‘‘(ii) serve at the direction of the 

2 Board.’’; and 

3 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(o) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

5 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be 

6 appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000 for 

7 each of fiscal years 2007 through 2009. 

8 ‘‘(2) EFFECT ON OTHER FUNDS.—Funds ap9 propriated under paragraph (1) shall not reduce the 

10 amount of funds available for any other program re11 lating to Indian education.’’. 

12 SEC. 3. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AND SUPPORT. 

13 Section 502 of the Indian Self-Determination and 

14 Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 458bbb–1) is 

15 amended— 

16 (1) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (2) 

17 and inserting the following: 

18 ‘‘(2) may provide funds— 

19 ‘‘(A) to pay the operating costs of the 

20 Foundation; and 

21 ‘‘(B) to reimburse travel expenses of a 

22 member of the Board under section 501; and’’; 

23 and 
4 

•S 1231 IS

1 (2) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘operating 

2 and’’ before ‘‘travel expenses’’. 

Æ
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 3D printing could help DLA cut costs, improve parts support

By Beth ReeceDLA Public Affairs

                FORT BELVOIR, Virginia  –              DLA Logistics Operations

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA Logistics OperationsWarfighter FirstResearch and Development
Caspian

Sea

Sea of

Azov Aral

Sea

Black Sea

RUSSIA

KAZAKHSTAN

GEORGIA

ARMENIA AZERBAIJAN

IRAQ IRAN SYRIA

TURKEY

UZBEKISTAN

TURKMENISTAN

UKRAINE MOLDOVA

ROMANIA

BUL.

Karachaganak

Kashagan Tengiz

Azeri

Chirag

Guneshli

Deep

Neka-Tehran

50,000 b/d

(first stage)

Atyrau-Samara

300,000 b/d

Karachaganak-Atyrau

(planned) 180,000 b/d

Caspian Pipeline

Consortium (CPC) Project

560,000 b/d (first stage)

Northern Early

100,000 b/d

Western Early

115,000 b/d

Baku-T’bilisi-Ceyhan

(planned) 1 million b/d

Yuzhnyy-Brody

180,000 to 240,000 b/d

Kazakhstan-China

(proposed)

Kazakhstan-Iran

(proposed)

KIEV

YEREVAN

T’BILISI

ANKARA BAKU

TEHRAN

Horasan

Novorossiysk

CHISINAU

Ceyhan

Tikhoretsk

Sup’sa

Erzurum

Neka Port

Makhachkala

Aqtau

(Aktau)

Atyrau

0 100 200 Kilometers

0 100 200 Miles

Major crude oil export pipeline

Oil pipeline planned, proposed,

or under construction

Oil, gas, and condensate field

Boundary representation is

not necessarily authoritative.

Caspian Region Oil Pipelines (U)

UNCLASSIFIED 759738AI 4-02
G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
---------------------------
Certified Public Accountant

                                                  330 E. Warm Springs
                                                 Las Vegas, NV  89119
                                                         702.528.1984
                                                  425.928.2877 (efax)


August 9, 2001


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of G. Brad Beckstead, CPA, consents to the inclusion of my report
of August 9, 2001, on the Financial Statements of Benchmark Technology
Corporation for the six months ending June 30, 2001, in any filings which
are necessary now or in the near future to be filed with the US Securities
and Exchange Commission.

Signed,


/s/ G. Brad Beckstead
----------------------
G. Brad Beckstead, CPA


<PAGE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
Exhibit 99.1


PRESS RELEASE


Contact:     David J. O'Connor
             President and Chief Executive Officer
             New England Bancshares, Inc.
             (860) 253-5200

              NEW ENGLAND BANCSHARES, INC. ANNOUNCES ANNUAL MEETING

      Enfield,  Connecticut - May 15, 2007.  New England  Bancshares,  Inc. (the
"Company")  (Nasdaq GM: NEBS),  the holding  company for Enfield Federal Savings
and Loan  Association  (the "Bank"),  announced today that the Company's  Annual
Meeting of Stockholders will be held on August 9, 2007 at 1:00 p.m.

      New England Bancshares, Inc. is headquartered in Enfield, Connecticut, and
operates Enfield Federal Savings and Loan Association with eight banking centers
servicing the  communities of Enfield,  Ellington,  Manchester,  Suffield,  East
Windsor and Windsor Locks.  For more  information  regarding the Bank's products
and services, please visit www.enfieldfederal.com.
                           ----------------------
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of China Shandong Zhouyuan Seed and Nursery
      Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      “Report”), I, Zhang Chunman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
            /s/
                Zhang ChunmanZhang
                ChunmanChief
                Financial Officer


Date:
      November 19, 2008
|   | (a) | the                Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarterly Period Ended March 31,                2007,                filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission                (the                "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   /s/                Douglas C.                Gulotty                          |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Douglas                C. Gulotty                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | President                and Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                   |
|   | Date:  May                7, 2007                                                                                                                                                                            |
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6916

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BOBBY LEE HARRIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-96-8-BO, CA-97-51-2-BO) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 4, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bobby Lee Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Harris , Nos. CR-96-8-BO; CA-97-51-2-BO (E.D.N.C. May 4, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries III, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: January 26, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries III, Inc.
No. 55613.

#### Edward P. Paul & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 169530-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.