alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STERLING
DRILLING FUND 1983-2 FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          57,413
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,737
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,150
<PP&E>                                      13,431,833
<DEPRECIATION>                            (12,206,629)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,331,354
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,331,354<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,331,354
<SALES>                                        433,330<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               433,330
<CGS>                                          378,488
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  378,488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    54,842
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.10<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Other - SE is composed of partnership equity.
<F2>Sales - The sales line includes $2,219 of interest income.
<F3>EPS - Primary is based upon limited partners share of net income divided by the
outstanding partnership units of 15,697.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of RCG Companies Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their
knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date:  October 13, 2004

/s/ Michael D. Pruitt
-------------------------
Michael D. Pruitt
Chief Executive Officer

/s/ William W. Hodge
-------------------------
William W. Hodge
Chief Financial Officer
#### Charlotte D. PHIPPEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-516.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 1, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 11, 1977.

Richard E. Mandell of Michael Sigman, Orlando, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Harry M. Hipler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon review we find the evidence, as a matter of law, insufficient to convict the Appellant.

REVERSED with directions to discharge the Appellant.

CROSS, ALDERMAN and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
Presidential Documents

40727

Federal Register

Vol. 62, No. 146

Wednesday, July 30, 1997

Title 3—

The President

Memorandum of July 24, 1997

Delegation of Authority Under Section 1424 of the National

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997

Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense

By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the

United States of America, including section 301 of title 3 of the United

States Code, I hereby delegate to you, in consultation with the Secretary

of State, the authority vested in the President under section 1424(c) of

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Public Law

104–201).

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal

[FR Doc. 97–20276

Register

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, July 24, 1997.

.

œ–

Filed 7–29–97; 8:45 am]

Billing code 5000–04–M
No. 00-6585.

#### Seifert *v.*Williams, Warden, et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Annual Report of ATC Healthcare, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ending February 28, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Andrew Reiben, Senior Vice President - Finance, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

                   (2) The information in the Report fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/S/ ANDREW REIBEN
-------------------------------------
Andrew Reiben
Senior Vice President - Finance,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

July 29, 2005

This certification accompanies this amended Report on Form 10-K/A pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.





                                       53
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Electronic Clearing House, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alice
L. Cheung, Chief Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:


     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Alice L. Cheung



Alice L. Cheung
Chief Financial Officer
December 26, 2003


<PAGE>
No. 46537.

#### Protest 854-K of Goldfarb Novelty Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

The sample was found to consist of a small base, approximately *1){*inches by 3 inches, on which a miniature representation of a slide is erected, small figures of kittens being fastened to the base and slide in various positions showing them engaged in climbing the ladder to the slide, sliding, etc. ■ There is nothing movable about the articles. A witness for the plaintiff testified that the articles are used as ornaments on shelves or china closets and are not used for the amusement of children. This was corroborated by the sample. In accordance therewith the merchandise was held dutiable as a manufacture in chief value of celluloid at 60 percent under paragraph 31 as claimed.
#### HEBERTON v. STOCKTON.

November 25, 1837.

*Rule to show cause why the service of the writ should not be set aside.*

The service of a summons, issued by this court on the 28th of October, returnable to the monthly return day of November, *i. e.*the first Monday of November, on that day, during' the sitting of the court is good, and will not be set aside.

IN this case, the summons issued on the 28th of October, 1837, returnable to a monthly return day, viz: the first Monday of November, 1837, (see act of 28th March, 1835, *Stroud’s Purd. tit. Courts,)*which was on the 7th of November. It was served on the return day, during the sitting of the court.

The defendant obtained this rule to show cause.

*Iieishell,*for plaintiff.

*Perkins,*for defendant.

The Court

held the service to be good, and discharged the rule,

Rule discharged.a

a

 Sec the index in this volume, as to the issuing and service of writs, under the acts of 28th March, 1835, and 13th June, 1836, relating to the commencement of actions.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 99.1

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of GOLDSPRING, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John Cook, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respect, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/S/ John Cook
-------------
Name: John Cook
Title: Chief Executive Officer and President
Date: November 11, 2003
No. 47107.

#### Protest 68951-K of Harbor Ship Supply Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keepe, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of cylindrical' and tubular tanks or vessels and that they are the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Atlas Marine Supply*
      *502
      *Co.*v. *United States*(29 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 165). In accordance therewith the drums in question were held entitled to free entry under section 309 (a), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 5 (a), Customs Administrative Act of 1938, as claimed.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1200 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1200

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the depreciation 
               recovery period for certain roof systems.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 8, 2005

 Mr. Bunning (for himself, Mr. Talent, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. DeMint, and 
   Mr. Lott) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the depreciation 
               recovery period for certain roof systems.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Realistic Roofing Tax Treatment Act 
of 2005''.

SEC. 2. DEPRECIATION RECOVERY PERIOD FOR CERTAIN ROOF SYSTEMS.

    (a) 20-Year Recovery Period.--Subparagraph (F) of section 168(e)(3) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to classification of 
certain property) is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(F) 20-year property.--The term `20-year 
                property' includes--
                            ``(i) initial clearing and grading land 
                        improvements with respect to any electric 
                        utility transmission and distribution plant, 
                        and
                            ``(ii) any roof system which meets the 
                        requirements of Standard 90.1-2004 of the 
                        American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and 
                        Air Conditioning Engineers.''.
    (b) Requirement To Use Straight Line Method.--Paragraph (3) of 
section 168(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(I) Any roof system described in subsection 
                (e)(3)(F)(ii).''.
    (c) Alternative System.--The table contained in section 
168(g)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 
striking the last item and inserting the following new items:

``(F)(i)..................................................           25
(F)(ii)...................................................       20.''.

''.    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[House Report 107-49]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                     107-49

======================================================================

 
    PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.J. RES. 41, THE TAX LIMITATION 
                        CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT

                                _______
                                

   April 24, 2001.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

   Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 118]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 118, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for the consideration of H.J. Res. 
41, the Tax Limitation Constitutional Amendment, under a 
modified closed rule. The rule provides two hours of debate in 
the House equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary.
    The resolution provides for one amendment in the nature of 
a substitute if offered by the Minority Leader or his designee 
and printed in the Congressional Record, which shall be 
considered as read and shall be separately debatable for one 
hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 
opponent. Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit 
with or without instructions.

                            COMMITTEE VOTES

    Pursuant to clause 3(b) of House Rule XIII the results of 
each record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together 
with the names of those voting for and against, are printed 
below:

Rules Committee record vote No. 8

    Date: April 24, 2001.
    Measure: H.J. Res. 41, the Tax Limitation Constitutional 
Amendment.
    Motion by: Mr. Frost.
    Summary of motion: Make in order an amendment by 
Representative Jackson Lee that would require a two-thirds vote 
for any cuts to Social Security or Medicare Parts A and B.
    Results: Defeated 2 to 6.
    Vote by Member: Goss--Nay; Linder--Nay; Pryce--Nay; 
Sessions--Nay; Reynolds--Nay; Frost--Yea; Slaughter--Yea; 
Dreier--Nay.

                                

```
No. 48888.

#### Protests 94656-K, etc., of Coty Processing Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were therefore dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42240]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20721]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. QF87-433-004]


Chambers Cogeneration L.P.; Notice of Application for Commission 
Recertification of Qualifying Status of a Small Power Producer

July 31, 1997.
    On July 21, 1997, Chambers Cogeneration, L.P. of 7500 Old 
Georgetown Road, Bethesda, Maryland 20814-6161 submitted for filing an 
application for recertification of a facility as a qualifying 
cogeneration facility pursuant to section 292.207(b) of the 
Commission's Regulations. No determination has been made that the 
submittal constitutes a complete filing.
    The cogeneration facility, located in Salem County, New Jersey, was 
previously recertified as a qualifying cogeneration facility, Chambers 
Cogeneration Limited Partnership, 75 FERC para. 62,158 (1996). The 
instant request for recertification reflects a change in ownership 
interest.
    Any person desiring to be heard or objecting to the granting of 
qualifying status should file a motion to intervene or protest with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). All motions or protests should be filed on or before August 
11, 1997 and must be served on the applicant. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20721 Filed 8-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
ex10-3.htm


    EXHIBIT
      10.3

     

    
      
        NS8
          CORPORATION

        


        AMENDMENT
          NO. 1

        TO
          SECURED CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE

         NO.
          001

        


        


        THIS
          DEBENTURE AMENDMENT SHOULD BE ATTACHED TO THE

        ORIGINAL
          DEBENTURE

        


         

        This
          Amendment No. 1 to Debenture (this “Amendment”) is issued in connection with
          that certain Secured Convertible Debenture No. 001 (the “Debenture”) issued by
          NS8 Corporation, (the “Company”) to Cornell
          Capital Partners, L.P. (the “Holder”), on May  19,
          2004 in the original principal amount of $750,000.

        


        THIS
          CERTIFIES THAT, the following amendments are hereby made to the
          Debenture:

         

        
          	
                  1.  

                	
                  The
                    due date of the Debenture as stated in Section 1.01 shall hereinafter
                    be
                    extended from May 19, 2007 to July 19,
                    2008.

                


        

         

        
          	
                  2.  

                	
                  The
                    interest rate as set forth in Section 1.01 shall be increased
                    from five
                    percent (5%) to fourteen percent (14%) effective as of July 20,
                    2007.

                


        

         

        


         

        IN
          WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be signed by
          its duly authorized officer.

         

        NS8
          CORPORATION

        


        
          	
                   

                	
                   

                	
                   

                
	
                  Date: July
                    20, 2007

                	
                  By:  

                	
                  /s/ George
                    G.
                    O’Leary               
                    

                
	
                   

                	
                  George
                    G. O’Leary

                
	
                   

                	
                  Chief
                    Financial Officer

                  (Principal
                    Financial and Accounting Officer)
No. 46561.

#### Protests 966436-G, etc., of Carpel Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Stokby*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358) it was held that 10 percent allowance should have been made for the weight of the gelatinous material in question.
No. 00-826.

#### Thompson *v.*Pete’s Brewing Co.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Case No. 9,382.

#### MECHANICS’ BANK v. LYNN.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 217.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1820.

Notes — Indorser—Place Where Pa table — Demand of Maker — Protest.

If a promissory note be made payable at the house of R. Y., the first indorser, and the notary public, on the day after the last day of grace, demand payment of R. Y„ at his house, without asking for the maker, or inquiring whether he had left funds to pay the note, such demand is not sufficient to entitle the plaintiff to recover against the second indorser.

[See Case No. 9,884.]

Assumpsit against the second indorser of John Weightman’s note to Robert Young, payable at the house of Robert Young, four months from the 25th of December, 1816. James Millan, a notary public, testified, that on the 29th of April, 1817, (the day after the last day of grace,) he demanded payment from Robert Young, and the defendant, Adam Lynn; and believed it was at the house of Robert Young; but did not ask for John Weightman, the maker of the note, nor inquire whether he had left funds to pay it That Weightman did not reside in the county of Alexandria, and therefore he could not demand payment from him. The other parties all resided in Alexandria. Christopher Neale testified that the defendant requested the bank not to sue him, as, in the event of his being obliged to pay it, it would save the expense of one suit

Mr. Swann, for plaintiff.

Mr. Taylor, for defendant

THE COURT

(nem. con.) instructed the jury that the evidence, so stated, was not sufficient to entitle the plaintiff to recover.

Nonsuit.