alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### H. S. Dorf *&*Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6011.

Invoice dated Naples, Italy, May 14, 1936.

Certified May 16, 1936.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 12, 1936.

Entry No. 852414.

(Decided May 15, 1944)

*William Whynman*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Ekwall, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hefeto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto, that the instant appeal to reappraisement covers peeled tomatoes and *463tomato sauce in tins which were exported from Italy. That the said merchandise and the issues involved in the instant appeal to reappraisement are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and issues involved in *United States*v. *Luigi Vitelli Elvea, Inc., et al.,*Reap. Dec. 5941; that the merchandise covered by the instant appeal to reappraisement was at the time of exportation thereof, sold and freely offered for sale in Italy to all purchasers in the ordinary course of trade, packed ready for shipment in the usual wholesale quantities, in Naples, one of the principal markets of Italy, for exportation to the United States, at the following values:

> Cases 24 tins @$2.10 U. S., less 2%, less .65 lire per case

> Cases 48 tins @$2.70 U. S., less 2%, less .65 lire per case

> Cases 100 tins tomato sauce @$4.50 U. S., less 2%, less .65 lire per case

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the record in Reap. Dec. 5941 be incorporated herein, and the said appeal to reappraisement is submitted on this stipulation.

> The instant reappraisement appeal is abandoned as to all other merchandise other than the merchandise hereinabove described.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are as follows:

> Cases 24 tins @ $2.10 U. S., less 2%, legs .65 lire per case

> Cases 48 tins @ $2.70 U. S., less 2%, less .65 lire per case

> Cases 100 tins tomato sauce @ $4.50 U. S,, less 2%, less .65 lire per case

The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeal is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2306 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on fine animal hair of Kashmir 

(cashmere) goats, processed beyond the degreased or carbonized condition. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. LIEBERMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on fine animal 

hair of Kashmir (cashmere) goats, processed beyond the 

degreased or carbonized condition. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINE ANIMAL HAIR OF KASHMIR (CASHMERE) 

4 GOATS, PROCESSED BEYOND THE 

5 DEGREASED OR CARBONIZED CONDITION. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.77 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 fine animal hair of Kashmir (cashmere) goats, processed 

9 beyond the degreased or carbonized condition) is amended 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2306 IS

1 by striking the date in the effective period column and 

2 inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

5 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

6 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Certificate Of Publication 

U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency 

Chicago, IL 6060 4 

STATE OF ILLINOIS i U.S . E.P.A. REGION 

S S- Notic e Of Proposed 

Renewal Of Veolia 1 s 

Titl e V Permit 

St. Clair County } 

EAST ST. LOUIS MONITOR PUBLISHING CO., INC., a corporation, hereby 

certifies that it is the publisher of THE MONITOR and that said THE MONITOR 

is a weekly, secular newspaper of general circulation in said County, published 

in the City of East St. Louis, in said County and State, and that said newspaper is a newspaper as defined in "An Act to revise the lawn in relation to 

notices," approved February 13,1874, as amended, and that the printed notice 

hereto annexed and hereby made a part of this certificate has been published 

in said newspaper. 

THE EAST ST. LOUIS MONITOR 

in each and every copy and impression thereof; that the date of the first newspaper containing said publication was 

OCT. 2 3 

A.D. 20_ 

1 4 

and that the date of the last newspaper containing said publication was 

OCT . 2 3 14 

. A.D. 20 _, and that 

ANNE E. JORDAN 

by resolution of the Board of Directors of said East St. Louis Monitor 

Publishing Co., Inc., has been authorized to make this certificate. 

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF said EAST ST. LOUIS MONITOR PUBLISHING 

CO., INC. has caused this certificate to be executed in its name by said 

ANNE E. JORDAN 24 OCT , this 

A.D. 20 14 

day of 

Publication Fee 

« 516.6 0 

EAST ST. LOUIS MONITOR PUBLISHING CO., INC. 

By^^^l £jW . 

Air arm nauipi ' v . 

77 West Jackson Blvd 

Chicago, IL 60604 

Attn: James R. Daugherty 

CJI 2 7 & 

n Agency 

md Assessment Branch
No. 99-7571.

#### Louis *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
#### Ex parte STATE of Alabama ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL.

SC 2695.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 29, 1977.

FAULKNER, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
Case No. *10,087.*

#### The NEIL COCHRAN.

[The case reported under above title in Browne, Adm. 162, is the same as Case No. 7,-996.]
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Bryan WILLIAMS.

No. 97-KH-3133.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1998.

In re Williams, Bryan; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 380-368; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 96KA-1767.

Denied.

LEMMON, J., not on panel.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42971]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21114]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM97-14-16-000]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Tariff Filing

August 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 31, 1997, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheet No. 9, with a 
proposed effective date of August 1, 1997.
    National states that pursuant to Article II, Section 2, of the 
approved settlement at Docket No. RP94-367-000, et al., National is 
required to recalculate the maximum Interruptible Gathering (IG) rate 
monthly and to charge that rate on the first day of the following month 
if the result is an IG rate more than 2 cents above or below the IG 
rate as calculated under Section 1 of Article II. The recalculation 
produced an IG rate of 10 cents per dth.
    National further states that, as required by Article II, Section 4, 
National is filing a revised tariff sheet within 30 days of the 
effective date for the revised IG rate.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC, 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 or 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR Sections 385.211 or 385.214). All such 
motions or protests must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the 
Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21114 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**








In
      connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Summit Environmental
      Corporation, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
      December 31, 2004 (the “Report”), I, Chris Dellinges, Chief Financial Officer of
      the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:
      November 14, 2005




*/s/
                    Chris
                    Dellinges*Chris
                          Dellinges
                        Chief
                          Financial
                          Officer







The
      above
      certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB
      or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         269,939
<SECURITIES>                                 2,420,216
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,116,571
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 22,492,396
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,299,122
<PP&E>                                       1,524,372
<DEPRECIATION>                               (186,414)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,465,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,847,989
<BONDS>                                     17,458,422
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       496,087
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,314,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,465,729
<SALES>                                     10,702,130
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,702,130
<CGS>                                        8,462,012
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,449,454
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             705,118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,017,216
<INCOME-TAX>                                   477,352
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            462,492
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   539,864
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 153 (Friday, August 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42846-42847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20913]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC 
20549

Extension:
    Form 18, SEC File No. 270-105, OMB

[[Page 42847]]

Control No. 3235-0121
    Form 18-K, SEC File No. 270-108, OMB Control No. 3235-0120
    Form F-80, SEC File No. 270-357, OMB Control No. 3235-0404

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget requests for extension of the previously approved 
collections of information discussed below.
    Form 18 is used for the registration of securities under the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of any foreign government or political 
subdivision thereof. It is filed on occasion. An estimated 5 
respondents file Form 18 annually for a total burden of 40 hours.
    Form 18-K is an annual report for foreign governments and political 
subdivisions thereof. It provides updated information concerning 
registered securities. An estimated 11 respondents file Form 18-K 
annually for a total burden of 88 hours.
    Form F-80 is a form used to register under the Securities Act of 
1933 securities of certain issuers to be issued in exchange offers or a 
business combination. It is filed on occasion. An estimated 5 
respondents file Form F-80 annually for a total burden of 10 hours.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    General comments regarding the above information should be directed 
to the following persons: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Office of Management and Budget, Room 3208, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, D.C. 20503; and (ii) Michael E. Bartell, 
Associate Executive Director, Office of Information Technology, 
Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20549. Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30 days of this 
notice.

    Dated: August 1, 1997.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20913 Filed 8-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

674 

KA 12-01935 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

KIMBERLY M. DOYLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ROBERT B. HALLBORG,

JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DAVID PANEPINTO OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Deborah

A. Haendiges, J.), rendered September 7, 2012. The judgment revoked

defendant’s sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of

imprisonment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

(see People v Griffin, 239 AD2d 936).

Entered: June 13, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Be positive. 

Praise goes a long way with learners who struggle in reading.

Provide positive feedback when correct responses are made

(“Great! The word is Sequoia.”).

Be attentive.

Stop learners immediately after an error. Show them what to do

and provide them an opportunity to do it correctly (“That word

is ‘trouble.’ What word is this?”). Try not to use the word “no.”

Be precise.

Provide clear and direct instructions (“Say this word” rather

than “Would you say it?”).

Be mindful of mistakes made during the session. 

Record learner performance. Review anything that learners

miss. Remember, learners “should say it like they know it.”

Be diligent.

Work from the beginning to the end of the tutoring session. 

Be innovative. 

Keep tutoring sessions lively and dynamic. 

Be focused.

Try to ignore minor misbehavior. 

Only recognize good behavior.

Be patient. 

Show learners that you care about them through your

commitment and encouragement.

Be on time.

Arrive at least 15 minutes before the tutoring session begins.

Make sure plans for the session and materials are ready so the

session may begin as soon as the student arrives.

Be committed. 

Once you have begun to tutor a student, remain with that

student throughout the year. 

Be results-oriented. 

Gather learner performance data on a daily basis, and chart 

the data (using graphs, stars, etc.) to allow a visual display 

of improvements made in the program. 

The No Child Left Behind Act, signed into law by President Bush, opened a new

era in American education. The act contains the president’s four basic education

reform principles: stronger accountability for results; increased flexibility and

local control; expanded options for parents, including supplemental services for

children in low-performing schools; and an emphasis on teaching methods that

have been proven to work. No Child Left Behind provides nearly a billion dollars

in funding for the promotion of scientifically based reading instruction through

its Reading First and Early Reading First programs. 

www.NoChildLeftBehind.gov

U.S. Department of Education

400 Maryland Ave., S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20202

1-800-USA-LEARN

How Tutoring Helps Tips for Reading Tutors 

For the Learner

✪ Creates a more favorable atmosphere for learning

(particularly through the use of one-on-one instruction).

✪ Provides more time on task, increased opportunities to 

read and immediate feedback.

✪ Allows for immediate, positive and corrective feedback 

to help the learner stay on track and not repeat errors.

✪ Can increase reading performance.

✪ Can improve motivation and decrease frustration.

✪ Enhances interpersonal skills as a bond is established 

with the tutor.

✪ Allows for individual monitoring of progress to ensure 

that learning is taking place.

For the Tutor

✪ Establishes important skills such as patience,

trustworthiness and responsibility.

✪ Provides an opportunity for community service.

✪ Enhances interpersonal skills.

✪ Increases the tutor’s own reading performance as a 

result of tutoring.
#### Scott Daniel PHIPPS and Russell W. Binstead, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. FF-498.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 28, 1977.

Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, and Margaret Good, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellants.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

SMITH, Judge.

Appellants were convicted on a joint trial of aggravated assault, attempted kidnapping, and grand larceny. Binstead questions the sufficiency of the competent evidence against him on the grand larceny charge. A key link in the circumstantial chain of evidence against Binstead was Phipps’ presence in the stolen vehicle with *103another, arguably Binstead. However, Phipps’ presence in that vehicle was not established by evidence admissible against Binstead, but only by Phipps’ confession. The evidence was insufficient to support the conviction of Binstead for grand larceny.

Phipps urges that his enhanced sentence as a recidivist under Section 775.-084(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1975), was not accompanied by a written order, entered in the record, to the effect that the enhanced sentence “is necessary for the protection of the public from further criminal activity by the defendant . . . .” See *Chukes v. State,*334 So.2d 289 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). We do not consider that a written order to that effect is essential. A finding announced at the sentencing hearing is sufficient to satisfy the statute. Phipps makes no assertion that the trial judge entirely omitted that finding at the hearing, and he brings no transcript here to evidence its omission.

Phipps’ convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Binstead’s conviction and sentence for grand larceny are VACATED, and his other convictions are AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS, J., concur.
Exhibit 10.14


November 6, 2007


 


Mr. James J. Bresingham


[address omitted]


 


 


Dear Jim:


 


In reference to our recent
conversation, I am pleased to confirm the offer of promotion to Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer at SIRVA reporting directly to me.  This letter supersedes your offer letter
dated June 27, 2007.


 


Salary Band:  Executive
Band 20


 


Salary: Your salary will increase to $325,000 per year,
payable in bi-weekly installments.  The
salary is quoted on an annual basis for convenience only and does not imply
employment for a specific term, nor alter the “at will” status of your
employment.


 


Effective Date: 
November 11, 2007


 


Annual Bonus: You will be
eligible to participate in SIRVA’s Management Incentive Program, which at your
position has an annualized bonus potential of 75% of base salary, pro-rated
based on effective date and subject to terms of the program.  This payment will be subject to taxes and
other withholdings, which may be required.


 


Executive
Benefits:


 


	
  Company Car Allowance:

  	
   

  	
  $16,800 annually

  
	
  Financial Planning:

  	
   

  	
  AYCO

  
	
  Executive Physical:

  	
   

  	
  $1,500 annually

  



 


Senior Executive Severance
Program:  You will continue to be
eligible to participate in SIRVA’s Senior Executive Severance Program.  You have previously received a letter
specifying your level of participation in this program.


 


I have enclosed a copy of this offer letter for your records.  If you are in agreement with the terms
contained herein, please sign, date and return the enclosed copy of this offer
letter and return it to me in the enclosed envelope.


 


Congratulations on your promotion. 
We are very excited and look forward to your continued contributions!  
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [number
omitted].


 


Sincerely,


 


	
  /s/ Bob Tieken

  	
   

  
	
  Bob Tieken

  	
   

  
	
  Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  



 


Enclosures: 1 copy of offer letter


 


Accepted and Agreed to
this 7th day of November, 2007


 


	
  /s/ James Bresingham

  	
   

  
	
  James
  Bresingham