alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013026EN.01006601.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/66

---

Action brought on 22 November 2012 — NCL v OHIM (NORWEGIAN BREAKAWAY)

(Case T-514/12)

2013/C 26/130

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: NCL Corporation Ltd (Miami, United States of America) (represented by N. Grüger, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) in case R 1017/2012-4 of 12 September 2012 and refer the case back to the Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) in case R 1017/2012-4 of 12 September 2012 and refer the case back to the Board of Appeal;

| — | in the alternative, annul the decision in respect of services in Class 39: ‘Arranging of cruises, Cruise ship services, Cruise arrangement’ and refer the case back to the Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul the decision in respect of services in Class 39: ‘Arranging of cruises, Cruise ship services, Cruise arrangement’ and refer the case back to the Board of Appeal;

Arranging of cruises, Cruise ship services, Cruise arrangement

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘NORWEGIAN BREAKAWAY’ for services in Class 39 — Community trade mark application No 10 281 905

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Registration refused

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
Before the First Division,

November 5, 1941

No. 46536.

#### Petitions 6152-R, etc., of Arkell Safety Bag Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

These duress entries were made under the test case *(Arkell Safety Bag Co.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 4670) and additional duties were assessed. From an examination of the record and a consideration of the facts the court was satisfied that when these entries were made there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States, conceal or misrepresent the facts, or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petitions were therefore granted.
No. 48291.

Suit 4402.

#### United *States*v. *Associated Mfg. Co.*

C. D. 638 reversed April 5, 1943. C. A. D. 238.
POWER OF ATTORNEY

     The undersigned, a member of the Board of Directors of CalEnergy
Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby constitutes and
appoints Steven A. McArthur and Douglas L. Anderson and each of them, as
his/her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for and in his/her stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign on his/her behalf the Company's Form 10-K Annual Report
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 1995 and to execute any amendments
thereto and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and applicable stock exchanges, with the full power and authority
to do and perform each and every act and thing necessary or advisable to all
intents and purposes as he/she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying
and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his/her
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

                          POWER OF ATTORNEY

DATE:                 



                                                                  
DAVID L. SOKOL                        RICHARD R. JAROS            



                                                                  
EDGAR D. ARONSON                      BERNARD W. REZNICEK




                                                                  
JUDITH E. AYRES                       WALTER SCOTT, JR.





                                                                  
JAMES Q. CROWE                        JOHN R. SHINER




                                                                  
RICHARD K. DAVIDSON                   DAVID E. WIT



                           
BEN HOLT
### DEPARTMENT of ENVIRONMENT and NATURAL RESOURCES

N

~ 

## DEaT FacES. WT WS.

~ PMB 2020 JOE FOSS BUILDING 523 EAST CAPITOL PIERRE, SOUTH DAKOTA 57501-3182

denr.sd.gov

June 28, 2012 Sadie Hoskie, Director Water Program USEPA Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129 

## JUL d , V ~

Dear Ms. Hoskie: This is in response to your December 8, 2011, letter requesting the South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources to rnake a determination regarding certification under the Clean Water Act Section 401 for two proposed general permits. The general permits authorize discharges into water of South Dakota from small non-recreational vessels (less than 79 feet in length) and large non-recreational vessels (79 feet or greater in length). It is our understanding that Public Law 110-188 (July 31, 2008) removed recreational boats not subject to Coast Guard inspection from permitting, and Public Law 110-299 (July 31, 2008) provided a temporary moratorium on permitting commercial fishing vessels and non-recreational vessels less than 79 feet. The moratorium will expire December 18, 2013. In accordance with the Administrative Rules of South Dakota (ARSD) 74:51:01:65 — Secretary's certification of compliance with water quality standards, I am waiving the authority to act on the request for certification for Small Vessel General Permit for Discharges Incidental to the Normal Operation of Vessels Less than 79 Feet (sVGP) and the General Permit for Discharges Incidental to the Normal Operation of Vessels (VGP). This action is being taken because at this time no vessels require penmitting in South Dakota. Thank you for your request for state 401 certification. If you have any questions, please contact Jeanne Goodman with my staff at (605) 773-3351. Sinc ely,

Steven M. Pirner 

### Secretary
No. 45331.

#### Protest 852856-G of S. Lisk & Bro. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 25607 the fur monkeys in question were held dutiable at 50 percent under paragraph 1519 (e) as claimed.
EXHIBIT
      32.2


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Oak Hill Financial, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dale
      B.
      Shafer, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




*/s/
      Dale B. Shafer*




Dale
      B.
      Shafer


Interim
      Chief Financial Officer





November
      9, 2007








-25-
#### CITY OF CORAL SPRINGS, a Florida Municipal Corporation, Appellant, v. UNITED FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF BROWARD COUNTY, Louis Kaye and Georgia Marie Kaye, his wife, Appellees.

No. 76-1711.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 10, 1976.

Paul J. McDonough, Coral Springs, for appellant.

Michael K. Davis, of Watson, Hubert & Davis, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee-United Federal Sav. and Loan Ass’n of Broward County.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAGER, C. J., and CROSS and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.
May, 2012 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Economic Impact Analysis for Proposed Reconsideration of Final Rule for Standards of 

Performance for Stationary Gas Turbines; Standards of Performance for Stationary 

Combustion Turbines 

FROM: Tom Walton 

Economist 

AEG (C439-02) 

TO: Christian Fellner 

 Engineer 

 ESG (D243-01) 

This document addresses the economic impacts of the proposed Reconsideration of Final Rule for 

Standards of Performance for Stationary Combustion Turbines. Economic impact analyses focus on 

changes in market prices and output levels. If changes in market prices and output levels in the primary 

markets are significant enough, impacts on other markets are also examined. 

The proposed amendments would not change the EPA’s original projections for this rule's compliance 

costs, environmental benefits, burden on industry or the number of affected facilities. Therefore, these 

proposed amendments will have no costs or changes in emissions. No market changes are projected. 

The proposed rule will have no impact on prices or output. Since there is no cost for any entity, there is 

no significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the quarterly  report of Coventure  International  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  October 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Minqing Lu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



Date:  December 14, 2005                           By: /s/ MINQING LU
                                                       --------------
                                                       Minqing Lu
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2314 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on noils of camel hair. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. LIEBERMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on noils of 

camel hair. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NOILS OF CAMEL HAIR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.25 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 noils of camel hair) is amended by striking the date in 

7 the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2314 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 00-695.

#### Musser *v.*Salomon/Smith Barney, Inc.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cyberads, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") the undersigned hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 19, 2005               CYBERADS, INC.

                                 By: /s/ JEFF CRISWELL
                                 --------------------------
                                 Jeff Criswell, President,
                                 Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 149 (Monday, August 4, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 41882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20478]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

49 CFR Part 544

[Docket No. 96-130; Notice 03]
RIN 2127-AG56


Insurer Reporting Requirements; List of Insurers Required To File 
Reports; Correction

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Correction to final regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the final regulation 
[Docket No. 96-130; Notice 03], which was published Monday, June 23, 
1997, (62 FR 33754). The regulation related to the information 
reporting requirements for passenger motor vehicle insurers that are 
required to file reports on their motor vehicle theft loss experiences, 
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33112.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 23, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Rosalind Proctor (202) 366-0846.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication on June 23, 1997, (62 FR 33754) of 
this final regulation [Docket No. 96-130; Notice 03], which were the 
subject of FR Doc. 97-16334, is corrected as follows:

PART 544--CORRECTED

    Paragraph 1. On page 33756, in the first column, in the words of 
issuance, remove the words ``proposed to be''.
    Paragraph 1. On page 33756, in amendatory instruction 1, the words 
``would be revised to read as follows'' are corrected to read 
``continues to read as follows''.
    Paragraph 2. On page 33756, in the amendatory instructions 2, 3, 4, 
6, and 7, the words ``would be revised to read as follows'' are 
corrected to read ``is revised to read as follows''.

    Dated as signed: July 29, 1997.
L. Robert Shelton,
Associate Administrator for Safety Performance Standards.
[FR Doc. 97-20478 Filed 8-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STERLING
DRILLING FUND 1983-2 FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           8,410
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,965
<PP&E>                                      13,414,061
<DEPRECIATION>                            (12,078,506)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,370,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,370,520<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,370,520
<SALES>                                        387,605<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               387,605
<CGS>                                          332,522
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  332,522
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    55,083
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.69<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Other-Se is composed of partnership equity.
<F2>Sales-The sales line includes $499 of interest income
<F3>EPS-Primary is based upon limited partners share of net income divided by the
outstanding partnership units of 15,697
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Annual Report of Electronic Clearing House, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Alice Cheung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.




                                        \s\ Alice Cheung
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        Alice Cheung
                                        Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
                                        December 23, 2002


<PAGE>
#### STATE of Alabama DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS v. McELRATH FARMS, INC., a corporation.

Civ. 886.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

July 20, 1977.

WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.

Upon remand to this court by the Supreme Court of Alabama, 348 So.2d 257, the judgment of this court, entered November 24, 1976, 348 So.2d 252, is hereby set aside and in accordance with the directions of the Supreme Court the judgment of the trial court granting rehire credit to McEl-rath Farms, Inc. is reversed and remanded.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

BRADLEY and HOLMES, JJ., concur.
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

22) ll-K- (B) -9 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/200811:12:48 AM Sheet 22 of 325 
P.2 

H-K-CB)-9 

PROJECTED NATURAL GAS SUPPLIES. 

Letter from M. Bonney, EPA-Washington to Informal 

Analysis Working Group. 

September 24, 1979. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-9
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Freedom of Information Actannual report.**
 
SuDoc Number:B 1.1/4:

Item Number:1100-B-06 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000671367
 
2000-07| 2009
2010| 2011 | 2012| 2013 | 2014| 2015 | 2016| 2017
 
March 5, 2020
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #9 Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                         /s/ Freddie M. Kotek
                         -----------------------------------------
                         Freddie M. Kotek
                         Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner
                         August 14, 2003




                                       18
(Reap. Dec. 9963)

#### Abraham & Straus, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 781831.

(Decided April 5, 1961)

*Siegel, Mandelíé Davidson*for tlie plaintiff.

*WilUam B. Orricls, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the respective parties have submitted this appeal for reappraisement for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise and the issues in the Appeal to Reappraisement enumerated above are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and the issues decided in the case of *Paramount Import Co. Inc. et al.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 9697, and that the record in said ease be incorporated and made a part of the record herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appraised values of the merchandise covered by the Appeal to Reappraisement enumerated herein, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the Appraiser in similar cases, is equal to the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States and that there was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise.

*649On the agreed facts and following my cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and hold that such statutory value therefor is the appraised value, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.