Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 1997 / Notices 41359

all securities posted will be refunded or

canceled.

If the ITC determines that material

injury, or threat of material injury, does

not exist, the proceeding will be

terminated and all securities posted will

be refunded or canceled. If the ITC

determines that such injury does exist,

the Department will issue an

antidumping duty order directing

Customs officials to assess antidumping

duties on all imports of the subject

merchandise entered, or withdrawn

from warehouse, for consumption on or

after the effective date of the suspension

of liquidation.

This determination is published

pursuant to section 733(f) of the Act.

Jeffrey P. Bialos,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

Dated: July 24, 1997.

[FR Doc. 97–20281 Filed 7–31–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–423–602]

Industrial Phosphoric Acid From

Belgium; Final Results of Antidumping

Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of final results of

antidumping duty administrative

review.

SUMMARY: On June 6, 1997, the

Department of Commerce (the

Department) published the preliminary

results of review of the antidumping

duty order on industrial phosphoric

acid (IPA) from Belgium (52 FR 31439;

August 20, 1987). The review covers one

manufacturer, Socie ́te ́ Chimique PrayonRupel (Prayon), and exports of the

subject merchandise to the United

States during the period August 1, 1995,

through July 31, 1996.

We gave interested parties an

opportunity to comment on the

preliminary results of review. Since we

did not receive any comments, we have

not changed our analysis for the final

results from that presented in the

preliminary results of review.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 1, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David Genovese, Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th

Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20230, telephone:

(202) 482–4697.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Applicable Statute

Unless otherwise indicated, all

citations to the statute are references to

the provisions effective January 1, 1995,

the effective date of the amendments

made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act)

by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act

(URAA). In addition, unless otherwise

indicated, all citations to the

Department’s regulations are to 19 CFR

part 353 (1997).

Background

On August 30, 1996, FMC Corporation

and Albright & Wilson Americas, two

domestic producers of IPA, requested an

administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on IPA from

Belgium with regard to Prayon. The

Department initiated the review on

September 17, 1996 (61 FR 48882),

covering the period August 1, 1995,

through July 31, 1996. On June 6, 1997,

the Department published the

preliminary results of review (62 FR

31073). The Department has now

completed this review in accordance

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of

1930, as amended (the Act).

Scope of the Review

The products covered by this review

include shipments of IPA from Belgium.

This merchandise is currently

classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff

Schedule (HTS) item number 2809.20.

The HTS item number is provided for

convenience and U.S. Customs

purposes. The written description

remains dispositive.

Final Results of Review

We gave interested parties an

opportunity to comment on the

preliminary results. The Department

received no comments. Accordingly, we

have determined that a margin of 8.54

percent exists for Prayon for the period

August 1, 1995, through July 31, 1996.

The Department will issue appraisement

instructions directly to the U.S. Customs

Service.

The following deposit requirements

will be effective for all shipments of the

subject merchandise entered, or

withdrawn from warehouse, for

consumption on or after the publication

date of these final results of

administrative review, as provided by

section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash

deposit rate for Prayon will be 8.54

percent; (2) for merchandise exported by

manufacturers or exporters not covered

in this review but covered in a previous

review or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, the cash

deposit rate will continue to be the rate

published in the most recent final

results or determination for which the

manufacturer or exporter received a

company-specific rate; (3) if the exporter

is not a firm covered in this review,

earlier reviews, or the original

investigation, but the manufacturer is,

the cash deposit rate will be that

established for the manufacturer of the

merchandise in these final results of

review, earlier reviews, or the original

investigation, whichever is the most

recent; and (4) the ‘‘all others’’ rate, as

established in the original investigation,

will be 14.67 percent.

These deposit requirements, when

imposed, shall remain in effect until

publication of the final results of the

next administrative review.

This notice also serves as a final

reminder to importers of their

responsibility under 19 CFR 353.26 to

file a certificate regarding the

reimbursement of antidumping duties

prior to liquidation of the relevant

entries during this review period.

Failure to comply with this requirement

could result in the Secretary’s

presumption that reimbursement of

antidumping duties occurred and the

subsequent assessment of double

antidumping duties.

This notice also serves as a reminder

to parties subject to administrative

protective orders (APOs) of their

responsibility concerning the

disposition of proprietary information

disclosed under APO in accordance

with 19 CFR 353.34(d). Timely written

notification of return/destruction of

APO materials or conversion to judicial

protective order is hereby requested.

Failure to comply with the regulations

and the terms of an APO is a

sanctionable violation.

This administrative review and notice

are in accordance with section 751(a)(1)

of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)) and 19

CFR 353.22.

Dated: July 25, 1997.

Jeffrey P. Bialos,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–20382 Filed 7–31–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

University of Arizona; Notice of

Decision on Application for Duty-Free

Entry of Scientific Instruments

This decision is made pursuant to

section 240 of the Trade and Tariff Act
41360 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 1997 / Notices

of 1984 as amended by Pub. L. 104–295,

which pertains solely to the application

described below. Related records can be

viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.

in Room 4211, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th and Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.

Applicant: University of Arizona,

Steward Observatory, Tucson, AZ

85721. Instrument: Submillimeter

Bolometer, Receivers, Acoustical

Optical Spectrometer, Spectrometers

and other custom equipment to support

a submillimeter telescope.

Manufacturer: Max Planck Institute,

Germany. Intended Use: See notice at 62

FR 33603, June 20, 1997.

Comments: None received. Decision:

Approved. No instruments of equivalent

scientific value to the foreign

instruments for such purposes as the

instruments are intended to be used, are

being manufactured in the United

States. Reasons: These are compatible

accessories for an existing instrument

purchased for the use of the applicant.

We know of no domestic accessories

which can be readily adapted to the

existing instrument.

Frank W. Creel,

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.

[FR Doc. 97–20384 Filed 7–31–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

The University of Houston, et al.;

Notice of Consolidated Decision on

Applications for Duty-Free Entry of

Electron Microscopes

This is a decision consolidated

pursuant to Section 6(c) of the

Educational, Scientific, and Cultural

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.

L. 89–651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part

301). Related records can be viewed

between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in

Room 4211, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th and Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.

Docket Number: 97–042. Applicant:

The University of Houston, Houston, TX

77204. Instrument: Electron Microscope,

Model JEM–2010F. Manufacturer: JEOL,

Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at

62 FR 32766, June 17, 1997. Order Date:

March 3, 1997.

Docket Number: 97–045. Applicant:

Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798–

7088. Instrument: Electron Microscope,

Model JEM–1010. Manufacturer: JEOL,

Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at

62 FR 32766, June 17, 1997. Order Date:

March 24, 1997.

Docket Number: 97–048. Applicant:

Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS

66506–4901. Instrument: Electron

Microscope, Model CM100.

Manufacturer: Philips, The Netherlands.

Intended Use: See notice at 62 FR

34691, June 27, 1997. Order Date: March

27, 1997.

Comments: None received. Decision:

Approved. No instrument of equivalent

scientific value to the foreign

instrument, for such purposes as these

instruments are intended to be used,

was being manufactured in the United

States at the time the instruments were

ordered. Reasons: Each foreign

instrument is a conventional

transmission electron microscope

(CTEM) and is intended for research or

scientific educational uses requiring a

CTEM. We know of no CTEM, or any

other instrument suited to these

purposes, which was being

manufactured in the United States at the

time of order of each instrument.

Frank W. Creel,

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.

[FR Doc. 97–20385 Filed 7–31–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

University of Wisconsin, et al.; Notice

of Consolidated Decision on

Applications for Duty-Free Entry of

Scientific Instruments

This is a decision consolidated

pursuant to Section 6(c) of the

Educational, Scientific, and Cultural

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.

L. 89–651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part

301). Related records can be viewed

between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in

Room 4211, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th and Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.

Comments: None received. Decision:

Approved. No instrument of equivalent

scientific value to the foreign

instruments described below, for such

purposes as each is intended to be used,

is being manufactured in the United

States.

Docket Number: 97–040. Applicant:

University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI

53706. Instrument: Ti:Sapphire Laser,

Model MBR–110. Manufacturer:

Microlase Optical Systems, United

Kingdom. Intended Use: See notice at 62

FR 32296, June 13, 1997. Reasons: The

foreign instrument provides: (1) a line

length less than 100 kH, (2) scan length

of 0–30 GHz (digitally controlled) and

(3) scan time of 5–4000 seconds

(digitally controlled).

Docket Number: 97–044. Applicant:

University of Rochester, Rochester NY

14627. Instrument: (2) ICP Mass

Spectrometers, Model Plasma 54.

Manufacturer: VG Elemental, United

Kingdom. Intended Use: See notice at 62

FR 32766, June 17, 1997. Reasons: The

foreign instrument provides a doublefocussing magnetic sector analyzer with

9 Faraday collectors with precision less

than 0.003%.

The capabilities of each of the foreign

instruments described above are

pertinent to each applicant’s intended

purposes. We know of no instrument or

apparatus being manufactured in the

United States which is of equivalent

scientific value to either of the foreign

instruments.

Frank W. Creel,

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.

[FR Doc. 97–20386 Filed 7–31–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

Applications for Duty-Free Entry of

Scientific Instruments

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the

Educational, Scientific and Cultural

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.

L. 89–651; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part

301), we invite comments on the

question of whether instruments of

equivalent scientific value, for the

purposes for which the instruments

shown below are intended to be used,

are being manufactured in the United

States.

Comments must comply with 15 CFR

301.5(a) (3) and (4) of the regulations

and be filed within 20 days with the

Statutory Import Programs Staff, U.S.

Department of Commerce, Washington,

D.C. 20230. Applications may be

examined between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00

P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.

Docket Number: 96–104R. Applicant:

University of Georgia, D W Brooks

Drive, Warnell School of Forest

Resources, Building #4, Room 102,

Athens, GA 30602. Instrument:

Environmental Process Control

Laboratory. Manufacturer: Minworth

Systems Ltd., United Kingdom.

Intended Use: Original notice of this

resubmitted application was published

in the Federal Register of October 30,

1996.

Docket Number: 97–054. Applicant:

City College of New York, 140th Street

and Convent Avenue, Room 165, New

York, NY 11235. Instrument: Rapid