Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 1997 / Rules and Regulations 41277

or critical comments be filed. This

action will be effective September 30,

1997 unless adverse or critical

comments are received by September 2,

1997.

If the EPA receives such comments,

this action will be withdrawn before the

effective date by simultaneously

publishing a subsequent notice that will

withdraw the final action. All public

comments received will then be

addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on this action serving as a

proposed rule. The EPA will not

institute a second comment period on

this action. Any parties interested in

commenting on this action should do so

at this time. If no such comments are

received, the public is advised that this

action will be effective on September

30, 1997.

II. Final Action

EPA is approving the establishment of

the year 2006 motor vehicle emissions

budgets for the Hancock and Waldo

counties ozone maintenance area at 6.44

tons per summer day of VOC, and 8.85

tons per summer day of NOX.

III. Administrative Requirements

A. Executive Order 12866

The Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) has exempted this regulatory

action from E.O. 12866 review.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act,

5 U.S.C. 600 et. seq., EPA must prepare

a regulatory flexibility analysis

assessing the impact of any proposed or

final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603

and 604. Alternatively, EPA may certify

that the rule will not have a significant

impact on a substantial number of small

entities. Small entities include small

businesses, small not-for-profit

enterprises, and government entities

with jurisdiction over populations of

less than 50,000.

SIP approvals under section 110 and

subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act

do not create any new requirements but

simply approve requirements that the

State is already imposing. Therefore,

because the Federal SIP approval does

not impose any new requirements, the

Administrator certifies that it does not

have a significant impact on any small

entities affected. Moreover, due to the

nature of the Federal-State relationship

under the CAA, preparation of a

flexibility analysis would constitute

Federal inquiry into the economic

reasonableness of state action. The

Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its

actions concerning SIPs on such

grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA,

427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C.

7410(a)(2).

C. Unfunded Mandates

Under Section 202 of the Unfunded

Mandates Reform Act of 1995

(‘‘Unfunded Mandates Act’’), signed

into law on March 22, 1995, EPA must

prepare a budgetary impact statement to

accompany any proposed or final rule

that includes a Federal mandate that

may result in estimated costs to State,

local, or tribal governments in the

aggregate; or to the private sector, of

$100 million or more. Under Section

205, EPA must select the most costeffective and least burdensome

alternative that achieves the objectives

of the rule and is consistent with

statutory requirements. Section 203

requires EPA to establish a plan for

informing and advising any small

governments that may be significantly

or uniquely impacted by the rule.

EPA has determined that the approval

action proposed does not include a

Federal mandate that may result in

estimated costs of $100 million or more

to either State, local, or tribal

governments in the aggregate, or to the

private sector. This Federal action

approves pre-existing requirements

under State or local law, and imposes

no new requirements. Accordingly, no

additional costs to State, local, or tribal

governments, or to the private sector,

result from this action.

D. Submission to Congress and the

General Accounting Office

Under section 801(a)(1)(A) of the

Regulatory Flexibility Act as added by

the Small Business Regulatory

Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, EPA

submitted a report containing this rule

and other required information to the

U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of

Representatives and the Comptroller

General of the General Accounting

Office prior to publication of the rule in

today’s Federal Register. This rule is not

a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by section

804(2).

E. Petitions for Judicial Review

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of

this action must be filed in the United

States Court of Appeals for the

appropriate circuit by September 30,

1997. Filing a petition for

reconsideration by the Administrator of

this final rule does not affect the finality

of this rule for the purposes of judicial

review nor does it extend the time

within which a petition for judicial

review may be filed, and shall not

postpone the effectiveness of such rule

or action. This action may not be

challenged later in proceedings to

enforce its requirements. (See section

307(b)(2).) EPA encourages interested

parties to comment in response to the

proposed rule rather than petition for

judicial review, unless the objection

arises after the comment period allowed

for in the proposal.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air

pollution control, Carbon monoxide,

Hydrocarbons, Intergovernmental

relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,

Particulate matter, Reporting and

recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur

oxides.

Dated: July 20, 1997.

John P. DeVillars,

Regional Administrator, Region I.

Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the

Code of Federal Regulations is amended

as follows:

PART 52—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 52

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q

Subpart U—Maine

2. Section 52.1036 is amended by

adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:

§ 52.1036 Emission inventories.

* * * * *

(e) On June 24, 1997 the Maine

Department of Environmental Protection

submitted a revision to establish explicit

year 2006 motor vehicle emissions

budgets [6.44 tons per summer day of

VOC, and 8.85 tons per summer day of

NOX] for the Hancock and Waldo

counties ozone maintenance area to be

used in determining transportation

conformity.

[FR Doc. 97–20366 Filed 7–31–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[NC–82–9728(a); FRL–5863–6]

Approval and Promulgation of

Revisions to North Carolina SIP

Involving Open Burning and Other

Miscellaneous Rules

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

SUMMARY: On August 16, 1996, North

Carolina submitted, through the

Department of Environment, Health,
41278 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 1997 / Rules and Regulations

and Natural Resources, revisions to the

North Carolina State Implementation

Plan (SIP). These revisions include

amendments and repeals of existing

rules. The primary purpose of these

revisions is to clarify the reasonably

available control technology (RACT)

standards and to make minor revisions

to the Stage I and Stage II rules. This

submittal also includes the adoption of

rules governing open burning. The

revisions relating to New Source

Performance Standards are not being

addressed in this document.

DATES: This final rule is effective

September 30, 1997 unless adverse or

critical comments are received by

September 2, 1997. If the effective date

is delayed, timely notice will be

published in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this

action should be addressed to Randy

Terry at the Environmental Protection

Agency, Region 4 Air Planning Branch,

61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia

30303.

Copies of documents relative to this

action are available for public

inspection during normal business

hours at the following locations. The

interested persons wanting to examine

these documents should make an

appointment with the appropriate office

at least 24 hours before the visiting day

and reference file NC82–01–9728. The

Region 4 office may have additional

background documents not available at

the other locations.

Air and Radiation Docket and

Information Center (Air Docket 6102),

U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, 401 M Street, SW,

Washington, DC 20460.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 4 Air Planning Branch, 61

Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia

30303.

North Carolina Department of

Environment, Health, and Natural

Resources, 512 North Salisbury Street,

Raleigh, North Carolina 27604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Randy Terry, Regulatory Planning

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air,

Pesticides & Toxics Management

Division, Region 4 Environmental

Protection Agency, 61 Forsyth Street,

SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303. The

telephone number is (404) 562–9032.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August

16, 1996, the State of North Carolina

Department of Environment, Health,

and Natural Resources submitted

revisions to amend, repeal, or adopt

multiple sections in their North

Carolina SIP. These amendments

address RACT, Stage I and II and open

burning. The amendments are as

follows:

15A NCAC 2D .0101 Definitions, 15A

NCAC 2Q .0103 Definitions, 15A NCAC

2Q .0109 Compliance Schedule for

Previously Exempted Activities, and

15A NCAC 2Q .0207 Annual Emissions

Reporting

These rules were amended to clarify

and correct permit processing and the

permit fee rules.

15A NCAC 2D .0501 Compliance With

Emission Control Standards, 15A NCAC

2D .0516 Sulfur Dioxide Emissions From

Combustion Sources, 15A NCAC 2D

.0518 Miscellaneous Volatile Organic

Compound Emissions, 15A NCAC 2D

.0521 Control of Visible Emissions, 15A

NCAC 2D .0535 Excess Emissions

Reporting and Malfunctions, 15A NCAC

2D .0601 Purpose and Scope, 15A

NCAC 2D .0604 Sources Covered by

Implementation Plan Requirements,

15A NCAC 2D .0608 Program Schedule,

and 15A NCAC 2D .0902 Applicability

These rules were amended to update

cross references to the section

containing National Emission Standards

for Hazardous Air Pollutants now that

the NESHAPS section has been

recodified.

15A NCAC 2D .0519 Control of Nitrogen

Dioxide and Nitrogen Oxides Emissions

This rule was amended to remove the

emission control standard, for Nitrogen

Dioxide, of .6 pounds per million

British Thermal Units (BTU) of heat

input from any oil or gas-fired boiler

with a capacity of 250 million BTU per

hour or more and 1.3 pounds per

million BTU of heat input from any

coal-fired boiler with a capacity of 250

million BTU per hour or more. This

change does not alter existing

regulations that limit the emission

control standard for Nitrogen Oxides

from an oil or gas fired boiler with a

capacity of 250 million BTU per hour to

.8 pounds per million BTU and limits

coal-fired boilers with a capacity of 250

million BTU per hour to 1.8 pounds per

million BTU.

15A NCAC 2D .0520 Control and

Prohibition of Open Burning

This rule was repealed and is being

replaced by the new rules found in

Section NCAC 2D .1900 Open Burning.

A brief summary of this new Section is

found later in this notice.

15A NCAC 2D .0531 Sources in

Nonattainment Areas and 15A NCAC

2D .0901 Definitions

These rules were amended to

reference the EPA definition for volatile

organic compound (VOC) listed under

40 CFR 51.100(s). Previously, the State’s

definition of VOC listed individually

the VOC’s with negligible

photochemical reactivity. Each time

EPA updated its list, the State rule had

to be amended to reflect these changes.

To eliminate the need to continually

amend the State rule for each change of

the VOC definition, the new state

definition was adopted to reference the

EPA definition of VOC as defined in 40

CFR51.100(s).

15A NCAC 2D .0804 Airport Facilities

This rule was amended to exempt

military airfields from the transportation

facilities permit procedures. The

majority of carbon monoxide emissions

at airports is due to ground support for

the aircraft. At military airports, much

of the air traffic is made up of touch and

go practice landings with little ground

support. Therefore carbon monoxide

emissions are not significant at military

airports.

15A NCAC 2D .0805 Parking Facilities

This rule was amended to revise the

definition of adjacent parking lots,

debris, or garages. The former definition

had caused some owners and

developers of new lots not to connect

them to existing lots with an internal

road in order to avoid having to obtain

a permit and do an analysis. To

overcome this problem the internal road

criterium was deleted and the rule was

revised to consider parking lots as one

if they are directly adjacent and they use

the same public roads and traffic

network.

15A NCAC 2D .0917 Automobile and

Light-Duty Truck Manufacturing, 15A

NCAC 2D .0918 Can Coating, 15A

NCAC 2D .0919 Coil Coating, 15A

NCAC 2D .0920 Paper Coating, 15A

NCAC 2D .0921 Fabric and Vinyl

Coating, 15A NCAC 2D .0922 Metal

Furniture Coating, 15A NCAC 2D .0923

Surface Coatings of Large Appliances,

15A NCAC 2D .0924 Magnet Wire

Coating, 15A NCAC 2D .0934 Coating of

Miscellaneous Metal Parts and

Products, 15A NCAC 2D .0935 Factory

Surface Coating of Flat Wood Paneling,

15A NCAC 2D .0937 Manufacture of

Pneumatic Rubber Tires, and 15A

NCAC 2D .0951 Miscellaneous Volatile

Organic Compound Emissions

These rules are coating rules that were

amended to clarify the wording that

limits the VOC emissions. The emission

standard in each rule was changed to be

read ‘‘emissions of VOC from [name of

process] shall not exceed X.X pound of

VOC per gallon of solids delivered to

the applicator.’’
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 1997 / Rules and Regulations 41279

15A NCAC 2D .0920 Paper Coating

This rule is additionally amended to

eliminate exemptions for graphic arts or

printing, processes in which coating is

not distributed uniformly across the

web, or processes where coating or

printing are performed on the same

machine. The graphic arts rule, 15A

NCAC 2D .0936, has eliminated the

need for this exemption.

15A NCAC 2D .0923 Surface Coatings of

Large Appliances

This rule was amended to include

language that exempts the use of quick

drying lacquers for repair of scratches

and nicks which occur during assembly.

15A NCAC 2D .0926 Bulk Gasoline

Plants and 15A NCAC 2D .0927 Bulk

Gasoline Terminals

These rules were amended to prohibit

the owner or operator of a bulk gasoline

plant from loading a gasoline truck tank

or trailer that is not certified as

complying with the vacuum-pressure

requirements in accordance with rule

2D .0933.

15A NCAC 2D .0928 Gasoline Service

Stations Stage I

This rule contains several exemptions

based on tank size. In order to qualify

for the exemption, these tanks must be

equipped with submerged fill pipe. This

rule was amended to allow either

permanently installed submerge fill

pipe or portable submerge fill pipe for

all exempted tanks. Previously, the rule

only allowed the use of portable

submerge fill pipe for tanks below 550

gallons installed after June 30, 1979, and

for tanks below 2000 gallons used to

store gasoline for farm or residential

use. The rule is amended to allow

portable submerge fill pipe for tanks

below 2000 gallons installed before July

1, 1979.

15A NCAC 2D .0929 Petroleum Refinery

Sources

This rule was repealed because it was

an unnecessary rule. This rule contains

the RACT requirements for various

types of sources at petroleum refineries.

There are no sources subject to the

requirements of this rule. In addition,

there are no petroleum refineries

currently in any of the ozone

maintenance areas or even in the rest of

North Carolina that could become

subject to this rule.

15A NCAC 2D .0953 Vapor Return

Piping for Stage II Vapor Recovery

This rule was amended to clarify that

the recovery risers referenced to in the

original rule are recovery dispenser

risers. The rule was also amended to

clarify that only with a vacuum assisted

system, would the vapor return piping

or manifold piping be required to enter

a separated opening to the tank from

that connected to the vent piping or the

Stage I piping.

15A NCAC 2D .0954 Stage II Vapor

Recovery

This rule was amended to change the

wording of the throughput exemptions

to read the same as those in 15A NCAC

2D .0953.

15A NCAC 2Q .0311 Permitting of

Facilities at Multiple Temporary Sites

This rule was amended to remove a

requirement for the permitting of

facilities at multiple temporary sites.

15A NCAC 2D .1901 Purpose, Scope,

and Impermissible Open Burning, 15A

NCAC 2D .1902 Definitions, .1903

Permissible Open Burning Without a

Permit and 15A NCAC 2D .1904 Air

Curtain Blowers

These rules were adopted to replace

the former open burning rule, 15A

NCAC 2D .0520 Control and Prohibition

of Open Burning. This action was taken

to add a number of amendments and

clarifications to the former rule and

make it less vague. The first amendment

was to clarify types of open burning

permissible without a permit and to

clarify their requirements. Second, an

additional rule was included to allow

the use of air curtain blowers, which are

used primarily to burn woodwaste from

logging operations and land clearing

activities. Third, a prohibition was

added to more readily notify persons

involved in the deliberate burning of

structures that any asbestos-containing

material needs to be removed before the

structure is burned.

Final Action

EPA is approving the aforementioned

revisions submitted on August 16, 1996,

for incorporation into the North

Carolina SIP. EPA is publishing this

action without prior proposal because

the Agency views this as a

noncontroversial amendment and

anticipates no adverse comments.

However, in a separate document in this

Federal Register publication, the EPA is

proposing to approve the SIP revision

should adverse or critical comments be

filed. This action will be effective

September 30, 1997 unless, by

September 2, 1997 adverse or critical

comments are received.

If the EPA receives such comments,

this action will be withdrawn before the

effective date by publishing a

subsequent document that will

withdraw the final action. All public

comments received will be addressed in

a subsequent final rule based on this

action serving as a proposed rule. The

EPA will not institute a second

comment period on this action. Any

parties interested in commenting on this

action should do so at this time. If no

such comments are received, the public

is advised that this action will be

effective September 30, 1997.

The EPA has reviewed this request for

revision of the Federally-approved SIP

for conformance with the provisions of

the 1990 Amendments enacted on

November 15, 1990. The EPA has

determined that this action conforms

with those requirements.

Nothing in this action should be

construed as permitting or allowing or

establishing a precedent for any future

request for revision to any SIP. Each

request for revision to the SIP shall be

considered separately in light of specific

technical, economic, and environmental

factors and in relation to relevant

statutory and regulatory requirements.

Administrative Requirements

A. Executive Order 12866

The Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) has exempted this regulatory

action from E.O. 12866 review.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act,

5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA must prepare

a regulatory flexibility analysis

assessing the impact of any proposed or

final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603

and 604. Alternatively, EPA may certify

that the rule will not have a significant

impact on a substantial number of small

entities. Small entities include small

businesses, small not-for-profit

enterprises, and government entities

with jurisdiction over populations of

less than 50,000.

SIP approvals under section 110 and

subchapter I, part D of the CAA do not

create any new requirements but simply

approve requirements that the State is

already imposing. Therefore, because

the Federal SIP approval does not

impose any new requirements, I certify

that it does not have a significant impact

on any small entities affected. Moreover,

due to the nature of the Federal-State

relationship under the CAA, preparation

of a flexibility analysis would constitute

Federal inquiry into the economic

reasonableness of state action. The CAA

forbids EPA to base its actions

concerning SIPs on such grounds.

Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S.

246, 255–66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2)

and 7410(k)(3).
41280 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 1997 / Rules and Regulations

C. Unfunded Mandates

Under Section 202 of the Unfunded

Mandates Reform Act of 1995

(‘‘Unfunded Mandates Act’’), signed

into law on March 22, 1995, EPA must

prepare a budgetary impact statement to

accompany any proposed or final rule

that includes a Federal mandate that

may result in estimated costs to State,

local, or tribal governments in the

aggregate; or to private sector, of $100

million or more. Under Section 205,

EPA must select the most cost-effective

and least burdensome alternative that

achieves the objectives of the rule and

is consistent with statutory

requirements. Section 203 requires EPA

to establish a plan for informing and

advising any small governments that

may be significantly or uniquely

impacted by the rule.

EPA has determined that the approval

action promulgated does not include a

Federal mandate that may result in

estimated costs of $100 million or more

to either State, local, or tribal

governments in the aggregate, or to the

private sector. This Federal action

approves pre-existing requirements

under State or local law, and imposes

no new requirements. Accordingly, no

additional costs to State, local, or tribal

governments, or to the private sector,

result from this action.

D. Submission to Congress and the

General Accounting Office

Under 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) as added

by the Small Business Regulatory

Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, EPA

submitted a report containing this rule

and other required information to the

U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of

Representatives and the Comptroller

General of the General Accounting

Office prior to publication of the rule in

today’s Federal Register. This rule is

not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5

U.S.C. 804(2).

E. Petitions for Judicial Review

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,

petitions for judicial review of this

action must be filed in the United States

Court of Appeals for the appropriate

circuit by Septeber 30, 1997. Filing a

petition for reconsideration by the

Administrator of this final rule does not

affect the finality of this rule for the

purposes of judicial review nor does it

extend the time within which a petition

for judicial review may be filed, and

shall not postpone the effectiveness of

such rule or action. This action may not

be challenged later in proceedings to

enforce its requirements. (See section

307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air

pollution control, Incorporation by

reference, Intergovernmental relations,

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and

recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur

oxides.

Dated: July 7, 1997.

Michael V. Peyton,

Acting Regional Administrator.

Part 52 of chapter I, title 40, Code of

Federal Regulations, is amended as

follows:

PART 52—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 52

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42.U.S.C. 7401–7671q.

Subpart II—North Carolina

2. Section 52.1770, is amended by

adding paragraph (c)(94) to read as

follows:

§ 52.1770 Identification of plan.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(94) The miscellaneous revisions to

the North Carolina State

Implementation Plan, which were

submitted on August 16, 1996.

(i) Incorporation by reference.

Regulations 15A NCAC 2D. 0101

Definitions, .0501 Compliance with

Emission Control Standards, .0516

Sulfur Dioxide Emissions Combustion

Sources, .0518 Miscellaneous Volatile

Organic Compounds Emissions, .0519

Control of Nitrogen Dioxide and

Nitrogen Oxides Emissions, .0520

Control and Prohibition of Open

Burning, .0521 Control of Visible

Emissions, .0531 sources in

Nonattainment Areas, .0535 Excess

Emissions Reporting and Malfunctions,

.0601 Purpose and Scope, .0604 Sources

Covered by Implementation Plan

Requirements, .0608 Program Schedule,

.0804 Airport Facilities, .0805 Parking

Facilities, .0901 Definitions, .0902

Applicability, .0917 Automobile and

Light-Duty Truck Manufacturing, .0918

Can Coating, .0919 Coil Coating, .0920

Paper Coating, .0921 Fabric and Vinyl

Coating, .0922 Metal Furniture Coating,

.0923 Surface Coating of Large

Appliances, .0924 Magnet Wire Coating,

.0926 Bulk Gasoline Plants, .0927 Bulk

Gasoline Terminals, .0928 Gasoline

Service Stations Stage 1, .0929

Petroleum Refinery Sources, .0934

Coating of miscellaneous Metal Parts

and Products, .0935 Factory Surface

Coating of Flat Wood Paneling, .0937

Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber Tires,

.0951 Miscellaneous Volatile Organic

Compound Emissions, .0953 Vapor

Return Piping for Stage II Vapor

Recovery, .0954 Stage II Vapor

Recovery, .1901, Purpose, Scope, and

Impermissible Open Burning, .1902

Definitions, .1903 Permissible Open

Burning Without a Permit, .1904 Air

Curtain Burners. 15A NCAC 2Q .0103

Definitions, .0109 Compliance Schedule

for Previously Exempted Activities,

.0207 Annual Emissions Reporting, and

.0311 permitting of Facilities at Multiple

Temporary Sites effective on July 1,

1996.

(ii) Other material. None.

[FR Doc. 97–20365 Filed 7–31–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81

[VT–014–01–1216(a); A–1–FRL–5860–2]

Approval and Promulgation of Air

Quality Implementation Plans;

Vermont; Approval of PM10 State

Implementation Plan (SIP) Revisions

and Designation of Areas for Air

Quality Planning Purposes

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision

submitted by the State of Vermont on

December 10, 1990. These revisions

were submitted in response to EPA’s

promulgation of new ambient air quality

standards which changed the total

suspended particulate (TSP) standard to

the particulate matter (PM10) standard.

The intended effect of this action is to

approve the submittal by Vermont

which establishes a National Ambient

Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for

PM10 and other minor revisions. This

action is being taken in accordance with

section 110 of the Clean Air Act.

DATES: This action is effective

September 30, 1997 unless EPA receives

adverse or critical comments by

September 2, 1997. If the effective date

is delayed, timely notice will be

published in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to

Susan Studlien, Deputy Director, Office

of Ecosystem Protection (mail code

CAA), U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region I, JFK Federal Building,

Boston, MA 02203. Copies of the

documents relevant to this action are

available for public inspection during

normal business hours, by appointment

at the Office Ecosystem Protection, U.S.