alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2367 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2367

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

                                 An Act

 
To strike the word ``lunatic'' from Federal law, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``21st Century Language Act of 2012''.
SEC. 2. MODERNIZATION OF LANGUAGE REFERRING TO PERSONS WHO ARE MENTALLY 
ILL.
    (a) Words Denoting Number, Gender, and So Forth.--Section 1 of 
title 1, United States Code, is amended--
        (1) by striking ``and `lunatic'''; and
        (2) by striking ``lunatic,''.
    (b) Banking Law Provisions.--
        (1) Trust powers.--The first section of the Act entitled ``An 
    Act to place authority over the trust powers of national banks in 
    the Comptroller of the Currency'', approved September 28, 1962 (12 
    U.S.C. 92a), is amended--
            (A) in subsection (a), by striking ``committee of estates 
        of lunatics,''; and
            (B) in subsection (j), by striking ``committee of estates 
        of lunatics''.
        (2) Consolidation and mergers of banks.--The National Bank 
    Consolidation and Merger Act (12 U.S.C. 215 et seq.) is amended--
            (A) in section 2 (12 U.S.C. 215)--
                (i) in subsection (e), by striking ``receiver, and 
            committee of estates of lunatics'' and inserting ``and 
            receiver''; and
                (ii) in subsection (f), by striking ``receiver, or 
            committee of estates of lunatics'' and inserting ``or 
            receiver''; and
            (B) in section 3 (12 U.S.C. 215a)--
                (i) in subsection (e), by striking ``receiver, and 
            committee of estates of lunatics'' and inserting ``and 
            receiver''; and
                (ii) in subsection (f), by striking ``receiver, or 
            committee of estates of lunatics'' and inserting ``or 
            receiver''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
No. 46538.

#### Protests 864797-G, etc., of D. Cracchiolo et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1438 EVERY PENNY COUNTS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. FIRST DATA CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee, and VALUTEC CARD SOLUTIONS, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee, and INCOMM HOLDINGS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee, and COMDATA STORED VALUE SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida in case no.

8:07-CV-1254, Judge Richard A. Lazzara.

ON MOTION 

### ORDER Every Penny Counts, Inc. moves without opposition for leave to file its corrected reply brief out of time. Upon consideration thereof,IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT 

## FEB 2 2009 Date

cc: Harvey S. Kauget, Esq. Alan Michael Fisch, Esq. Mark Michael Supko, Esq. Michael S. Connor, Esq. Scott J. Borstein, Esq. s17 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk FILED Us COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT FEB 0 2 2009 JAid HORSiu CLERK

2008-1438 2
(Reap. Dec. 9950)

#### C. H. Powell Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. CE-891853.

(Decided March 15, 1961)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*William S. Orriclc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawkence, Judge:

When this appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff, and the case was ordered submitted by the court.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### MISSISSIPPI STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION v. Wilmer H. WHITTLE.

No. 49212.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 9, 1977.

Bourdeaux & Jones, Thomas R. Jones, Meridian, D. M. Anderson, Newton, for appellant.

James B. Everett, Decatur, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Newton County; Roy Noble Lee, Judge.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., and SMITH and WALKER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

LEE, J., took no part.
#### F. H. Shallus Co. v. United States

No. 6960.

Entry No. 199, etc.

Invoices dated Leicester, England, July 4,1941, etc.

Certified July 7,1941, etc.

Entered at Baltimore, Md., August 11, 1941, etc.

(Decided March 4, 1947)

*Tompkins & Tompkins (J. Stuart Tompkins*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge (Abstract):

These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

The agreed set of facts, embodied in the stipulation of submission, establishes that export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)) is the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values of the articles in question are the appraised values, less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances in similar cases.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         413,230
<SECURITIES>                                   493,081
<RECEIVABLES>                                  152,077
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,259
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,075,184
<PP&E>                                         116,332
<DEPRECIATION>                                  63,892
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,225,776
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          243,326
<BONDS>                                        500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           996
<OTHER-SE>                                     455,311
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,225,776
<SALES>                                        354,497
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               572,190
<CGS>                                           27,297
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   86,904
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               377,148
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (12,857)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                120,995
<INCOME-TAX>                                    36,765
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             84,230
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    85,314
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.89


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Planar Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven J. Buhaly, Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                                            
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ STEVEN J. BUHALY                                       
|    |  | Steven J. Buhaly Vice President and Chief Operating Officer



December 13, 2005
Exhibit 23.1  Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-56123) pertaining to the Bioanalytical Systems, Inc. 1997 Employee
Incentive Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-56127) pertaining to the 1997 Bioanalytical Systems, Inc. Outside Director
Stock Option Plan of our report dated November 28, 2003, except for the last paragraph of the Senior Debt section of Note 7 as to which the date is January 8, 2004, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc. included in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2003.

/s/  Ernst & Young LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
January 8, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 147 (Thursday, July 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20156]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases 
Special Emphasis Panel meeting:

    Name of SEP: ZDK1-GRB-C-03-S.
    Date: August 20, 1997.
    Time: 2:00 p.m.
    Place: Room 6as-37E, Natcher Building, NIH, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Dan E. Matsumoto, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, NIDDK, Natcher Building, Room 6as-37E, 
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-6600, Phone: 
(301) 594-8894.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    This meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93-847-849, 
Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases; Digestive Diseases and 
Nutrition; and Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, 
National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: July 24, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-20156 Filed 7-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
No. 47787.

#### Protest 31904-K/89311 of Wilson Sporting Goods Co. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

At the hearing three witnesses were called. One, the superintendent of the plant of the exporters of the .leather in issue, and who are tanners of leather, testified as to the various processes glove leather is subjected to, with the result that the natural grain of the leather shows up. The other two witnesses, the assistant factory superintendent of the plaintiff-company, and a leather salesman with years of experience, testified that the leather in issue is finished glove leather. Two samples were received in evidence and examination of these reveals that they contain what might, to the layman, be considered a grained or pebbly effect. From the record presented, the court was satisfied that the leather in issue consists of soft, tanned, finished glove leather, made from cowhides, and that it has not been grained. The claim at 15 percent under paragraph 1530 (b) (5) as amended by T. D. 49753 was therefore sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2329 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2329

    To reduce temporarily the duty on certain direct injection fuel 
                               injectors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 23, 2012

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To reduce temporarily the duty on certain direct injection fuel 
                               injectors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN DIRECT INJECTION FUEL INJECTORS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Direct injection    1.1%         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        fuel injectors                                                     31/2015.......
                        (solenoid valves)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8481.8090)
                        designed to
                        inject gasoline/
                        ethanol fuel
                        blends directly
                        into the
                        combustion
                        chamber of a
                        spark-ignition
                        combustion piston
                        engine in a high-
                        pressure non-port
                        injection system
                        in a motor
                        vehicle..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Mary G. Hutchinson *v.*United States

No. 8130.

Entry No. 47A-C.

(Decided June 16, 1952)

*684Lawrence, *Tuttle <& Harper (George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster*and *Chauncey E. Wilowshi,*special attorneys), for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

The merchandise in this case consists of silver articles and various other articles imported from Mexico. The articles were invoiced and entered at the same values. The appraiser, however, substantially advanced each item in value.

At the trial it was shown that the plaintiff was the broker who filed the reappraisement as agent on behalf of Juan Acosta; that the Mexican broker who had prepared the consular invoice could not be located, and the sellers of the merchandise, two Rozanes brothers, were both mentally incapacitated and had been inmates of a sanitarium for some years.

Inasmuch as the reappraisement had been continued from time to time since 1947 in the hope that evidence of the proper values could be procured and no solution had been reached after a period of 5 years, the case was ordered submitted on the record.

The evidence in the record as to value consists of an affidavit of the Mexican broker to the effect that he felt certain the prices upon the invoice were the correct prices for which the merchandise was sold. Such evidence is clearly insufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness of the finding of value made by the United States appraiser. I therefore find that the appraised values represent the value of the merchandise for duty purposes.

Judgment will therefore be entered in favor of the Government.
Order entered July 7, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00662-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.I.M., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-56047-2009

ORDER

We GRANT the June 23, 2014 motion of Rebecca Tillery to withdraw as counsel. We 

DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to remove Rebecca Tillery as counsel for appellee Brent 

Blackmore. Mr. Blackmore is now appearing before this Court pro se. We further DIRECT the 

Clerk of this Court to add the following contact information for Mr. Blackmore: 

801 Ingleside Drive

Plano, Texas 75075

brentblackmore@aol.com

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Robert O’BRIEN, John O’Neill, John Berman, David Grossfield, Steve Martin, Greg Orr, Michael Tidmarsh and Richard Badolato.

No. 60291.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 26, 1977.

In re: Robert O’Brien, et al. applying for writs of certiorari.

Writ granted in part. It is ordered that the probable-cause hearing be reopened to allow the defense to recall and cross-examine Deputy Sheriff Abadie. In all other respects the application is denied.

SUMMERS, J.,

dissents from the granting of this writ. The finding that these defendants and five others were in possession of $10,000,000. worth of marijuana overwhelmingly established probable cause to charge them.
**Exhibit 21**

AMTECH SYSTEMS, Inc. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

|   | **Name**                              |   | **Jurisdiction in which incorporated** |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                       |   |                                        |   |
|   | Tempress   Systems, Inc.              |   | State of   Texas                       |   |
|   |                                  |   |                                   |   |
|   | P.R. Hoffman   Machine Products, Inc. |   | State of   Arizona                     |   |
|   |                                  |   |                                   |   |
|   | Bruce   Technologies, Inc.            |   | State of   Massachusetts               |   |
|   |                                  |   |                                   |   |
|   | Bruce   Technologies Europe Gmbh      |   | Federal   Republic of Germany          |   |
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 147 (Thursday, July 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3306-000]


UTIL Power Marketing, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

July 28, 1997.
    UTIL Power Marketing, Inc. (UTIL) submitted for filing a rate 
schedule under which UTIL will engage in wholesale electric power and 
energy transactions as a marketer. UTIL also requested waiver of 
various Commission regulations. In particular, UTIL requested that the 
Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by UTIL.
    On July 22, 1997, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Applications, Office of Electric Power Regulation, granted 
requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by UTIL should file a motion to intervene 
or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, UTIL is authorized 
to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as a 
guarantor, endorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security of 
another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for some 
lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of UTIL's issuances of securities or assumptions of 
liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is August 21, 1997. Copies 
of the full text of the order are available from the Commission's 
Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20148 Filed 7-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32



<PAGE>



      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coventure International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), John Hromyk, the
President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


                                   By: /s/ John Hromyk
                                       ------------------------------
                                       John Hromyk
                                       President and Principal Financial Officer


March 19, 2004