alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Global Earth Energy, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending November 30, 2012, I, Sydney A. Harland, Chief Executive Officer of Global Earth Energy, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending November 30, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending November 30, 2012, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global Earth Energy, Inc.

Dated: January 22, 2013.

/s/ Sydney A. Harland

Sydney A. Harland, Chief Executive Officer of  Global Earth Energy, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1184 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1184

 To waive the passport fees for a relative of a deceased member of the 
Armed Forces proceeding abroad to visit the grave of such member or to 
         attend a funeral or memorial service for such member.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 7, 2005

   Mr. Biden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To waive the passport fees for a relative of a deceased member of the 
Armed Forces proceeding abroad to visit the grave of such member or to 
         attend a funeral or memorial service for such member.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PASSPORT FEES.

    Section 1 of the Act of June 4, 1920 (41 Stat. 750, chapter 223; 22 
U.S.C. 214) is amended in the third sentence by striking ``or from a 
widow, child, parent, brother, or sister of a deceased member of the 
Armed Forces proceeding abroad to visit the grave of such member'' and 
inserting ``or from a widow, widower, child, parent, grandparent, 
brother, or sister of a deceased member of the Armed Forces proceeding 
abroad to visit the grave of such member or to attend a funeral or 
memorial service for such member''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Ozolutions Inc.
File No. 000-31343

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                       as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                       of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ozolutions Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Max
Weissengruber, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: July 20, 2004                               By: /s/ Max Weissengruber
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                       as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                       of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ozolutions Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
Robertson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: July 20, 2004                               By: /s/ Douglas Robertson
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Ozolutions Inc. and will be retained by Ozolutions Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements included in Echo Bay Mines Ltd Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          16,953
<SECURITIES>                                    10,325
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     41,168
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,441
<PP&E>                                         978,794
<DEPRECIATION>                                 632,026
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 432,767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          108,105
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       709,593
<OTHER-SE>                                   (555,932)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   432,767
<SALES>                                        305,429
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               305,429
<CGS>                                          213,120
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  321,372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               402,783
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,646
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (418,726)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,782
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (420,508)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (420,508)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.06)


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      99.1





**MAGYAR
      BANK**





**400
      Somerset St., New Brunswick, NJ 08901**


**732.342.7600**





**Magyar
      Bank Names John S. Fitzgerald Chief Operating Officer**





New
      Brunswick, NJ—January 3, 2007—Magyar Bank has announced that **John
      S. Fitzgerald,** Dunellen,
      NJ, has been named Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer. Mr.
      Fitzgerald will continue his role as the Bank’s Chief Lending Officer
      responsible for the Bank’s residential, commercial and construction lending
      operations, as well as overseeing Magyar’s branch network.





Mr.
      Fitzgerald has been with Magyar for five years and has over 20 years experience
      in the banking industry. Mr. Fitzgerald currently serves on the Board of
      Directors for both the Middlesex County Regional Chamber of Commerce, and the
      Dunellen Lions Club, and is a graduate of the University of Maryland as well
      as
      the Stonier Graduate School of Banking.





**About
      Magyar Bank**


Magyar
      Bank, headquartered in New Brunswick, New Jersey, is the principal subsidiary
      of
      Magyar Bancorp (NASDAQ: MGYR), and is a $434 million asset community bank. Magyar
      Bank has been serving families and businesses in Central New Jersey for over
      80
      years with a complete line of financial products and services, and today Magyar
      operates branch locations in Branchburg, New Brunswick, North Brunswick and
      South Brunswick. Visit Magyar online at www.magbank.com .





Contact:
      John Reissner, 732.342.7600
123 STAT. 3018 PUBLIC LAW 111–106—NOV. 30, 2009 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3119: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009): 

July 21, 22, considered and passed House. 

Nov. 9, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–106 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 867 Stockton 

Street in San Francisco, California, as the ‘‘Lim Poon Lee Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LIM POON LEE POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 867 Stockton Street in San Francisco, California, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lim Poon Lee Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Lim Poon Lee Post Office’’. 

Approved November 30, 2009. 

Nov. 30, 2009 

[H.R. 3119] 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1 with PUBLIC LAWS
Exhibit
      99.1





**FOR
      IMMEDIATE RELEASE**





**For
      additional information contact:**


**Michael
      W. Shelton, Chief Financial Officer**


**Phone:
      336-369-0900**











**FNB
      FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION**


**ANNOUNCES
      QUARTERLY DIVIDEND**








**GREENSBORO,
      N.C** .--(BUSINESS
      WIRE)--August 14, 2006--FNB Financial Services Corporation (NASDAQ/NMS: FNBF)
      (“FNB”), parent
      of
      FNB Southeast, announced that the Board of Directors has approved a regular
      cash
      dividend of $0.12 per share for the third quarter of 2006. The dividend is
      payable September 29, 2006 to shareholders of record on September 15, 2006.




FNB
      Financial Services Corporation is a bank holding company with one subsidiary,
      FNB Southeast, a North Carolina chartered commercial bank. FNB Southeast
      currently operates 17 banking offices located in North Carolina and Virginia.
      FNB Southeast Mortgage Corporation and FNB Southeast Investment Services, Inc.
      are operating subsidiaries of FNB Southeast.
Exhibit 23(a)


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the inclusion in the  Registration  Statements of NCT Group,  Inc.
and subsidiaries  (the "Company") to the  incorporation by reference in Form S-3
(File  Nos.  333-64967  and  333-43387)  and Form S-8 (File Nos.  333-11213  and
333-47956)  of our  report,  which  includes  explanatory  paragraphs  about the
existence of substantial doubt concerning the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern and the adoption of the new  accounting  standards on goodwill and
for equity  instruments  with  characteristics  of both  liabilities and equity,
dated March 12, 2004,  with respect to Note 28 March 31, 2004,  on our audits of
the consolidated  financial  statements and schedule as of December 31, 2002 and
2003 and for the years ended  December 31,  2001,  2002 and 2003 which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Eisner LLP


New York, New York
April 6, 2004
No. 00-6448.

#### Griffith *v.*Wisconsin.

Sup. Ct. Wis. Certio-rari denied.
#### ILLINOIS CENTRAL GULF RAILROAD v. Heida E. HICKS.

No. 49995.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 15, 1978.

Adams, Forman, Truly, Ward, Smith & Bramlette, E. C. Ward, R. Kent Hudson, Natchez, for appellant.

John T. Green, Frank W. Walden, Natchez, for appellee.

Before INZER, P. J. and SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

Affirmed.
No. 45377.

#### Protest 894924-G of Howatt Brokerage Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstracts 36724 and 38185 the protest was sustained.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A0041. PARLIAMENT HOUSE PROPERTIES et al. v. GEORGIA

POWER COMPANY.

Georgia Power Company sought an order enjoining Parliament House

Properties, Inc., Jimmy Key Camper Park, James R. Key, and Tim F. Steedley

(collectively “Parliament House”) from encroaching and trespassing on Georgia

Power’s easement/right of way across Parliament House’s property. In a final order,

the trial court found that Parliament House violated the express terms of the

easements, and granted Georgia Power’s request for permanent injunctive relief.

Parliament House appeals from the grant of this injunction. We, however, lack

jurisdiction.

The Georgia Constitution grants the Supreme Court general appellate

jurisdiction over “all equity cases.” Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI , Sec. VI, Par. III (2).

“‘Equity cases’ are those in which a substantive issue on appeal involves the legality

or propriety of equitable relief sought in the superior court – whether that relief was

granted or denied.” Beauchamp v. Knight, 261 Ga. 608, 609 (2) (409 SE2d 208)

(1991). “Injunction is distinctly an equitable remedy[.]” (Citation omitted.) Knott v.

Evans, 280 Ga. 515, 516 (2) (630 SE2d 402) (2006).

Because the main issue on appeal is the propriety of the trial court’s grant of

equitable relief to Georgia Power, thisis an “equity case” within the Supreme Court’s

jurisdiction. Moreover, it is well-settled that the ultimate responsibility for

determining appellate jurisdiction is vested in the Supreme Court of Georgia. See

Saxton v. Coastal Dialysis &c., 267 Ga. 177, 178 (476 SE2d 587) (1996).

Accordingly, this case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court of Georgia.

July 13, 2015
If the Supreme Court ultimately decides that it lacks jurisdiction, we will

decide this case expeditiously upon its return to this Court.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/13/2015
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Thomas
      A. Martin, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of ICON Capital
      Corp., the General Partner of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly
      Report of ICON Income Fund Eight B L.P. (the "Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the
      period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the Partnership.








*Dated:
      November 13, 2007*





*/s/Thomas A. Martin*


Thomas
      A.
      Martin


Chairman,
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the General Partner


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


General
      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight B L.P.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lionel FRANKLIN.

No. 97-KH-3177.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1998.

In re Franklin, Lionel; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 7-93-1078; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 96KA 2442.

Denied.

MARCUS, J., not on panel.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE03953

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
- Reports & Publications
        - Work Plan
        - Top Management & Performance Challenges
        - Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program Report
        - Budget
        - Semiannual Reports to Congress
        - Unimplemented Recommendations
        - Office of Audit Services
        - Office of Evaluation and Inspections
        - Portfolio Reports
        - Other Reviews
        - Featured Topics
        - Federal Register

# Unimplemented Recommendations Archive

The *Compendium of Unimplemented Recommendations* became the *Solutions to Reduce Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in HHS Programs: Top Unimplemented Recommendations*  in 2018. In years prior to 2007, information about recommendations was provided in OIG's "Red Book" (unimplemented monetary recommendations) and "Orange Book" (unimplemented nonmonetary recommendations). The "Red Book" focused on significant recommendations to save costs and the "Orange Book" focused on recommendations to improve HHS programs.

## Compendium

    - Compendium: July 2019 Edition
    - Compendium: July 2018 Edition
    - Compendium: May 2017 Edition
    - Compendium: April 2016 Edition        Text-only version
    - Compendium: March 2015 Edition
    - Compendium: March 2014 Edition
    - Compendium: December 2012 Edition
    - Compendium: March 2011 Edition
    - Compendium: March 2010 Edition
    - Compendium:May 2009 Edition
    - Compendium:May 2008 Edition
    - Compendium: May 2007 Edition

## Red Books

    - 2005 Red Book
    - 2004 Red Book
    - 2003 Red Book
    - 2002 Red Book
    - 2001 Red Book
    - 2000 Red Book
    - 1999 Red Book
    - 1997-1998 Red Book
    - 1996 Red Book

## Orange Books

    - 2005 Orange Book
    - 2001-02 Orange Book
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Isaac Solomon, Appellant.

[614 NYS2d 229]

—Appeals by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), rendered July 16, 1991, convicting him of murder in the second degree under Indictment No. 13844/ 90, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of 25 years to life imprisonment; and (2) a judgment of the same court, rendered October 15, 1991, convicting him of assault in the second degree under Indictment No. 14358/ 90, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of four to eight years imprisonment, to run concurrently with the sentence imposed under Indictment No. 13844/90.

Ordered that the judgment rendered under Indictment No. 13844/90 is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment rendered under Indictment No. 14358/90 is modified, on the law, by reducing the sentence to an indeterminate term of three and one-half to seven years imprisonment, to run concurrently with the sentence imposed under Indictment No. 13844/90; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his request for a jury charge on manslaughter in the first degree as a lesser-included offense of murder in the second degree. Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the defendant, we find that there is no reasonable view of the evidence which would support a finding that the defendant committed the lesser offense but not the greater *(see, People v Green,*143 AD2d 768, 770; *People v Green,*134 AD2d 516, 517).

We also find, contrary to the defendant’s contentions, that the Supreme Court properly denied his request for an accomplice charge regarding two of the People’s witnesses because there was no evidence to support the view that either of the witnesses was an accomplice *(see,*CPL 60.22; *People v Tucker,*72 NY2d 849, 850; *People v Torres,*160 AD2d 746, 747).

The defendant correctly contends, however, that his sentence upon his plea of guilty to assault in the second degree exceeded the maximum term of three and one-half to seven years imprisonment *(see,*Penal Law §§ 120.05, 70.06 [3], [4]). *667Therefore, the sentence is modified to the extent indicated. Ritter, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.
#### Kermitt Lamar HORN, Orange County Board of County Commissioners, and Providence Washington Insurance Company, an Insurance Corporation, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Betty Ann RAGINS, Individually and as wife of John Lester Ragins, John Lester Ragins, Individually and as husband of Betty Ann Ragins, and John Lester Ragins, as next friend of Janie Lee Ragins, Appellees.

No. 76-2303.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 17, 1977.

A. Craig Cameron, Gosney, Cameron & Parsons, Orlando, for appellants.

James 0. Driscoll, Orlando, and R. David Ayers, Jr., Winter Park, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the dismissal of a third party complaint seeking contribution *81from the spouse of the plaintiff/appellee, Betty Ann Ragins, in a personal injury action. This court has recently decided that the common law doctrine of interspousal immunity does not apply to actions for contribution among joint tortfeasors.1 Accordingly, we must reverse the order of dismissal. However, since we perceive the question involved to be one of great public interest, we certify the following question to the Supreme Court of Florida:

> Is the doctrine of interspousal immunity a bar to an action against a claimant’s spouse for contribution under the uniform contribution among joint tort-feasors act?

The order of dismissal is reversed.

ANSTEAD, DAUKSCH and LETTS, JJ., concur.

1

. *Paoli*v. Shor, 345 So.2d 789 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).
#### Nathan Newman et al. *v.*United States

No. 6571.

Entry No. 744624, etc.

Invoices dated Sheffield, England, November 22, 1945, etc.

Certified November 26, 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., March 18, 1946, etc.

(Decided December 4, 1946)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.