alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32**






CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO




18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the Annual Report of Nestor, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
      for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, William
      B. Danzell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Nigel P. Hebborn, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to their knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company






Date:
      April 14, 2006




/s/
                William B. DanzellWilliam
                B. Danzell, Chief Executive Officer






Date:
      April 14, 2006




/s/
                Nigel P. HebbornNigel
                P. Hebborn, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeff Criswell, President and Chief Executive Officer of Cyberads, Inc. (the
"Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  January 30, 2006
                                          /s/ JEFF CRISWELL
                                          ----------------------
                                          Jeff Criswell
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
**

(GEN-24-10) 2025–2026 Award Year: FAFSA Information to be Verified and Acceptable Documentation

(ANN-24-15) Online Training Course – Completing the 2025–26 FISAP

(ANN-24-14) Updated Course Offerings ‒ Newly Redesigned Learning Tracks and FSA Basic Training for New Staff for 2024‒25 Award Year 

(ANN-24-13) Training Workshops – 2024-25 FSA Fundamentals Training Series

(GEN-24-09) Voluntary Disclosure of Hate Crime Sub-Categories

(ANN-24-12) Live Internet Webinar – 2024–25 FAFSA: Demo of FAFSA Partner Portal Corrections

(GEN-24-08) Ability to Benefit State Process and Eligible Career Pathway Programs 

(ANN-24-11) Live Internet Webinars – Wednesday Webinar Series, Summer–Fall 2024 (Updated Sept. 5, 2024)

(GEN-24-07) Implementation of Regulations Related to Financial Responsibility, Administrative Capability, Certification Procedures, and Ability to Benefit (ATB) (Updated August 23, 2024)

(ANN-24-10) Live Internet Webinar – 2024-25 FAFSA: Update on FAFSA Processing and Filing for Applicants Without SSNs

(ANN-24-09) Live Internet Webinar – Preparing for FVT/GE Reporting – New NSLDS Reports

(GEN-24-06) Implementation of Program Length Restrictions for Gainful Employment (GE) Programs (Updated August 23, 2024)

(GEN-24-05) Use of Negative Student Aid Index (SAI) in Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant (FSEOG) Selection Criteria

(ANN-24-08) Live Internet Webinar – 2024-25 FAFSA: Weekly Guidance and Processing Status Roundup

(ANN-24-07) Live Internet Webinar – Title IV Recertification (Sessions in May, July 2024) (Updated July 1, 2024)

Items per page:152550

              1 - 15 of 258            ****Previous              Next****
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2307 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on yarn of carded cashmere 

of 19.35 metric yarn count or higher. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. LIEBERMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on yarn of 

carded cashmere of 19.35 metric yarn count or higher. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. YARN OF CARDED CASHMERE OF 19.35 METRIC 

4 YARN COUNT OR HIGHER. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.02 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 yarn of carded cashmere of 19.35 metric yarn count or 

8 higher) is amended by striking the date in the effective 

9 period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2307 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));                and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |                                                                                                                            |                                     |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                           |                                                                                                                            |  /s/                ROBERT T. FABER |
|                           | Robert                T. Faber*President                and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial                Officer* |
| August                14, 2006 |                                                                                                                            |

----

----
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-21227

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KIRKPATRICK LAVONTE BROOKS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(01-CR-458)

August 28, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Kirkpatrick Lavonte Brooks pled guilty to possessio n of a

firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g),

and was sentenced to 120 months imprisonment and 3 years of

supervised release. He appeals his sentence as well as the factual

basis offered in support of his guilty plea. We affirm his

conviction, vacate his sentence, and remand for resentencing.

Brooks argues for the first time on appeal that the factual1 United States v. Da ugherty , 264 F.3d 513, 518 & n.12 (5th

Cir. 2001).

2 United States v. Jackson

, 220 F.3d 635, 639 (5th Cir. 2000),

overruled by United States v. Charles

, 2002 WL 1764147 (5th Cir.

July 31, 2002).

3 Charles , 2002 WL 1764147, at *4. basis offered in support of his guilty plea was insufficient to

support the interstate commerce element of his offense because it

only showed that the gun traveled in interstate commerce at some

point in the past. He concedes that this argument is foreclosed by

our precedent, 1 and seeks only to prese rve the claim for Supreme

Court review.

Brooks also argues that the district court erred in

calculating his base offense level unde r Section 2K2.1 of the

Sentencing Guidelines by treating his two prior convictions for

unauthorized use of a motor vehic le as “crimes of violence.”

Although the district court’s treatment of the prior convictions as

“crimes of violence” was correct under our precedent at the time, 2

under our recent en banc decision in United States v. Charles

,

unauthorized use of a vehicle is not a “crime of violence” for

sentencing purposes. 3 Accordingly, we vacate Broo ks’ sentence and

remand to the district court for re-sentencing.

Brooks also contends that the district court impermissibly

delegated its authority to the probation officer by permitting the

probation officer to determine Brooks’ "ability to pay" the costs

of drug and alcohol detection and treatment. Given that we havevacated his sentence, this issue is moot and we decline to consider

the question.

We AFFIRM Brooks’ conviction, VACATE his sentence, and REMAND

for resentencing in accordance with this opinion.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Report of China Natural Gas, Inc. (the "Company") to
Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Qinan Ji, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
July 20, 2009




/s/
      Qinan JiQinan
      Ji, Principal Executive
Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 149 (Monday, August 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20426]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 9179-002]


Wayne J. Krieger; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

July 29, 1997.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1960 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission's) 
Regulations, 18 CFR 380 (Order 486, 52 F.R. 47897), the Commission's 
office of Hydropower Licensing has reviewed an exemption surrender 
application for the Skyview Project, No. 9179-002. The Skyview Project 
is located on an unnamed tributary of Coy Creek in Curry County, 
Oregon. The exemptee is applying for a surrender of the exemption due 
to chronic generator problems that are uneconomical to repair. The EA 
finds that approving the application would not constitute a major 
federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human 
environment.
    Copies of the EA are available for review in the Commission's 
Reference and Information Center, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, 
D.C. 20426. For further information, please contact the project 
manager, Ms. Hillary Berlin, at (202) 219-0038.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20426 Filed 8-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1156 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the credit period 

for electricity produced from renewable resources at certain facilities, 

to extend the credit for electricity produced from certain renewable resources, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2005 

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the credit period for electricity produced from renewable 

resources at certain facilities, to extend the credit for 

electricity produced from certain renewable resources, 

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF CREDIT 

4 FOR PRODUCING ELECTRICITY FROM RE5 NEWABLE RESOURCES. 

6 (a) EXTENSION OF CREDIT PERIOD FOR ELEC7 TRICITY PRODUCED AT CERTAIN FACILITIES.—Subpara-
2

•S 1156 IS

1 graph (B) of section 45(b)(4) of the Internal Revenue 

2 Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 

3 ‘‘(B) CREDIT PERIOD.—In the case of any 

4 facility described in subsection (d)(3)(A)(ii) 

5 placed in service before October 22, 2004, the 

6 5-year period beginning on October 22, 2004, 

7 shall be substituted for the 10-year period in 

8 subsection (a)(2)(A)(ii).’’. 

9 (b) EXTENSION OF CREDIT.—Subsection (d) of sec10 tion 45 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating 

11 to qualified facilities) is amended by striking ‘‘January 1, 

12 2006’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘January 1, 

13 2008’’. 

14 (c) BINDING CONTRACTS FOR FACILITIES.—Sub15 section (d) of section 45 of the Internal Revenue Code of 

16 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

17 ‘‘For purposes of this subsection, a facility shall be treated 

18 as placed in service before January 1, 2008, if such facility 

19 is placed in service before January 1, 2011, pursuant to 

20 a written binding contract in effect on December 31, 

21 2007, and at all times thereafter before such facility is 

22 placed in service.’’. 

23 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

24 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para25 graph (2), the amendments made by this section 
3

•S 1156 IS

1 shall apply to electricity produced and sold after the 

2 date of the enactment of this Act, in taxable years 

3 ending after such date. 

4 (2) SUBSECTION (a).—The amendment made 

5 by subsection (a) shall apply to electricity produced 

6 and sold after December 31, 2004, in taxable years 

7 ending after such date.

Æ
# C_2012355EN.01003202.xml

| 17.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/32

---

Action brought on 4 September 2012 — Fetim v OHIM — Solid Floor (Solidfloor The professional's choice)

(Case T-395/12)

2012/C 355/68

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fetim BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: L. Bakers, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Solid Floor Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 June 2012 in case R 884/2011-2; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 June 2012 in case R 884/2011-2; and

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘Solidfloor The professional’s choice’, for goods in class 19 — Community trade mark application No 5667837

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: United Kingdom trade mark registration No 2390415 of the figurative mark ‘SOLID floor’, for goods in classes 19 and 37; Trade name ‘Solid Floor Ltd’ used in the course of trade in the United Kingdom; Domain name ‘SOLID floor’ used in the course of trade in the United Kingdom

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision, upheld the opposition in its entirety and rejected the CTM application

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
#### Linson GUIDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 75-1771.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 24, 1976.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul M. Herman, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Harry M. Hipler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAGER, C. J., and CROSS and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.
#### Larry LYONS, Christine Lyons, Bryan Lyons, Randy Lyons and Marie and Alton Lyons v. J. Patrick BATCHELOR, Commissioner of Conservation, State of Louisiana.

No. 98-C-2707.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 18, 1998.

IN RE: Lyons, Larry; Lyons, Christine; Lyons, Bryan; Lyons, Randy; Lyons, Marie; Lyons, Alton; — Plaintiff(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; Parish of East Baton Rouge 19th Judicial District Court Div. “H” Number 362,316-H; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number CA97 2023.

Denied.

VICTORY, J. not on panel.

KNOLL, J. would grant the writ.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1



                     SUBSIDIARIES OF WALL DATA INCORPORATED
                             AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     STATE OF INCORPORATION
                                                      OR COUNTRY IN WHICH
                           SUBSIDIARY                      ORGANIZED
             -------------------------------------   ----------------------
             <S>                                        <C>
             Wall Data (UK) Limited                      United Kingdom
             Wall Data (Canada) Limited                  Canada
             Wall Data (Barbados) Incorporated           Barbados
             Wall Data France s.a.r.l.                   France
             Wall Data GmbH                              Germany
             Wall Data Australia Pty Ltd.                Australia
             Wall Data Japan K.K.                        Japan
             Wall Data Mexico S.A. de C.V.               Mexico
             Wall Data Asia Pte. Ltd.                    Singapore
             Wall Data Limited                           Ireland
             Wall Data International                     Delaware
             Software Development Tools Limited          United Kingdom
             Software Development Tools Inc.             Delaware
             Software Development Tools Inc. France      France
             Expert Edge Computer Systems Limited        Ireland
             Radisson Limited                            Ireland
</TABLE>
#### Inter-Maritime Fwdg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6214.

Invoices dated London, England, April 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 29, 1942, etc.

Entry No. 752714, etc.

(Decided August 29, 1945)

*Tompkins & Tompkins (J. Stuart Tompkins*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney); for the defendant.

Cole, Judge:

.These appeals for reappraisement have been sub? mitted for decision on a written stipulation, filed August 20, 1945, wherein the parties agree that the issues-presented herein are the same as those decided in *United States*v. *Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc.,*32 C. C. P. A. 187, C. A. D. 305, and that the record in that case may be incorporated herein.

In the incorporated case, the court found cost of production, section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (f)), to be the proper basis for appraisement, and held that the so-cahed British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act, 1940 '3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48,” was not an item to be included in the “usual general expenses” contemplated within subdivision (2) of section 402 (f), *supra,*and therefore not to be calculated in determining such statutory value.

*423On the agreement- of counsel that the several elements entering into the statutory cost of production of the items in question is equal to the appraised values thereof, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases, I hold such values to be the cost of production, section 402 (f), *supra,*which I find to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchajidise.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# u .-

s :- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
- - x l

**~** F EDER A L A

VIA

TION AOMI N ISTR ,O.T I ON Ill N A!.' E

**~** 

### IIICHAEL 

# KANE II AOORESS 

### 55 1 SHUftW(ER OR 

### ltCN!OEVI l lE , PA 1 5146- 1 023 0 . 0 . 8 Sl' X >IE tG,_.T WI:

**tO~** H A JII &.YES 

### II 69 175 GRA Y HAZEl I