Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 146 / Wednesday, July 30, 1997 / Notices 40797

Whereas, § 400.28(a)(2) of the Board’s

regulations, requires approval of the

Board prior to commencement of new

manufacturing/processing activity

within existing zone facilities;

Whereas, the Port Huron-St. Clair

County Industrial Development

Corporation, grantee of FTZ 210, has

requested authority under § 400.28(a)(2)

of the Board’s regulations on behalf of

Petri, Inc., to manufacture automotive

steering wheels and related components

under zone procedures within FTZ 210,

Port Huron, Michigan (filed 12–10–96;

FTZ Doc. 83–96, 61 FR 66651, 12–18–

96);

Whereas, the Board adopts the

findings and recommendation of the

examiner’s report, and finds that the

requirements of the FTZ Act and the

Board’s regulations are satisfied and that

the proposal is in the public interest;

Now, therefore, the Board hereby

approves the request subject to the Act

and the Board’s regulations, including

§ 400.28.

Signed at Washington, DC, this day of

1997.

Jeffrey P. Bialos,

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for

Import Administration, Alternate Chairman,

Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest:

John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–20070 Filed 7–29–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 901]

Grant of Authority for Subzone Status

Abbott Manufacturing, Inc.; (Infant

Formula, Adult Nutritional Products)

Sturgis, Michigan

Pursuant to its authority under the

Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18,

1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u),

the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the

Board) adopts the following Order:

Whereas, by an Act of Congress

approved June 18, 1934, an Act ‘‘To

provide for the establishment * * * of

foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of

the United States, to expedite and

encourage foreign commerce, and for

other purposes,’’ as amended (19 U.S.C.

81a–81u) (the Act), the Foreign-Trade

Zones Board (the Board) is authorized to

grant to qualified corporations the

privilege of establishing foreign-trade

zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs

ports of entry;

Whereas, the Board’s regulations (15

CFR part 400) provide for the

establishment of special-purpose

subzones when existing zone facilities

cannot serve the specific use involved;

Whereas, an application from the City

of Battle Creek, Michigan, grantee of

Foreign-Trade Zone 43, for authority to

establish special-purpose subzone status

for export activity at the infant formula

and adult nutritional products

manufacturing plant of Abbott

Manufacturing, Inc., in Sturgis,

Michigan, was filed by the Board on

March 12, 1996, and notice inviting

public comment was given in the

Federal Register (FTZ Docket 22–96, 61

FR 12059, 3–25–96); and,

Whereas, the Board adopts the

findings and recommendations of the

examiner’s report, and finds that the

requirements of the FTZ Act and

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and

that approval of the application for

export manufacturing is in the public

interest;

Now, therefore, the Board hereby

grants authority for subzone status at the

Abbott Manufacturing, Inc., plant in

Sturgis, Michigan (Subzone 43C), at the

location described in the application,

subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s

regulations, including § 400.28, and

subject to the further requirement that

all foreign origin dairy products and

sugar admitted to the subzone shall be

reexported.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of

July 1997.

Jeffrey P. Bialos,

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for

Import Administration, Alternate Chairman,

Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

[FR Doc. 97–20068 Filed 7–29–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 910]

Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 38;

Spartanburg County, South Carolina

Pursuant to its authority under the

Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18,

1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u),

the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the

Board) adopts the following Order:

Whereas, an application from the

South Carolina State Ports Authority,

grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 38,

Spartanburg County, South Carolina, for

authority to expand FTZ 38 to include

an additional site at Wingo Corporate

Park in Spartanburg County, South

Carolina, was filed by the Board on

August 21, 1996 (FTZ Docket 65–96, 61

FR 45400, 8/29/96);

Whereas, notice inviting public

comment was given in Federal Register

and the application has been processed

pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s

regulations; and,

Whereas, the Board adopts the

findings and recommendations of the

examiner’s report, and finds that the

requirements of the FTZ Act and

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and

that the proposal is in the public

interest;

Now, therefore, the Board hereby

orders:

The application to expand FTZ 38 is

approved, subject to the Act and the

Board’s regulations, including Section

400.28.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of

July 1997.

Jeffrey P. Bialos,

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for

Import Administration, Alternate Chairman,

Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest:

John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–20071 Filed 7–29–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A–549–807]

Certain Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe

Fittings From Thailand; Final Results

of the Antidumping Duty

Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce

SUMMARY: On April 7, 1997, the

Department of Commerce

(‘‘Department’’) published in the

Federal Register its preliminary results

of the administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on certain

carbon steel butt-weld pipe fittings from

Thailand (62 FR 16541). This review

covers TTU Industrial Corp., Ltd.

(‘‘TTU’’), a manufacturer/exporter of the

subject merchandise to the United

States. The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is

July 1, 1995, through June 30, 1996.

Although we gave interested parties an

opportunity to comment on our

preliminary results, none of the

interested parties did so. Because TTU

failed to respond to the Department’s

questionnaire, as in the preliminary

results of this review, we have used

facts otherwise available in reaching the

final results.