alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2072

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus THOMAS JAMES VAN DEUSEN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-952-6-20) Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 18, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas James Van Deusen, Appellant Pro Se. Henry Douglas Knight, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Thomas James Van Deusen filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have sixty days within which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The district court entered its order on January 21, 1998; Van Deusen’s notice of appeal was filed on July 17, 1998, which is beyond the sixty-day appeal period. Van Deusen’s failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Van Deusen’s appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2016296EN.01000501.xml

| 16.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 June 2016 — Repsol Lubricantes y Especialidades SA, formerly Repsol Lubricantes YPF y Especialidades SA, Repsol Petróleo SA, Repsol SA v European Commission

(Case C-617/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Article 81 EC - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Spanish market for penetration bitumen - Market sharing and price coordination - Notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases (2002) - Final paragraph of point 23(b) - Partial immunity from fines - Evidence of facts previously unknown to the Commission))

(2016/C 296/07)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Repsol Lubricantes y Especialidades SA, formerly Repsol Lubricantes YPF y Especialidades SA, Repsol Petróleo SA, Repsol SA (represented by: L. Ortiz Blanco, J. Buendía Sierra, M. Muñoz de Juan, A. Givaja Sanz and A. Lamadrid de Pablo, abogados)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Urraca Caviedes and F. Castillo de la Torre, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Repsol Lubricantes y Especialidades SA, Repsol Petróleo SA and Repsol SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Repsol Lubricantes y Especialidades SA, Repsol Petróleo SA and Repsol SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20638]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Florida State University, et al.; Notice of Consolidated Decision 
on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments

    This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 
(Pub. L. 89-651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be 
viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instruments described below, 
for such purposes as each is intended to be used, is being manufactured 
in the United States.
    Docket Number: 97-038. Applicant: Florida State University, 
Tallahassee, FL 32310. Instrument: EPR W-Band System, Model ELEXSYS. 
Manufacturer: Bruker Instruments, Germany. Intended Use: See notice at 
62 FR 32296, June 13, 1997. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides 
operation at a frequency of 95 GHz for maximal sensitivity and precise 
control of temperature over the range of 4-300 degrees Kelvin. Advice 
received from: National Institutes of Health, June 26, 1997.
    Docket Number: 97-041. Applicant: University of North Carolina at 
Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7310. Instrument: Graphite Aerosol 
Generator, Model GFG-1000. Manufacturer: Palas GmbH, Germany. Intended 
Use: See notice at 62 FR 32766, June 17, 1997. Reasons: The foreign 
instrument provides uniform particle agglomerates that are similar to 
natural soot particles with a size less that 0.1 <greek-m>m. Advice 
received from: National Institutes of Health, June 26, 1997.
    The National Institutes of Health advises in its memoranda that (1) 
the capabilities of each of the foreign instruments described above are 
pertinent to each applicant's intended purpose and (2) it knows of no 
domestic instrument or apparatus of equivalent scientific value for the 
intended use of each instrument.
    We know of no other instrument or apparatus being manufactured in 
the United States which is of equivalent scientific value to either of 
the foreign instruments.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 97-20638 Filed 8-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                     THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Mediscience  Technology
Corp.,  (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended August 31, 2006 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Peter Katevatis, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company,  and I, Frank D. Benick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of 15
         (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



                              /s/ Peter Katevatis



October 13, 2006              -------------------------------------------------
                              Peter Katevatis
                              Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer



                              /s/ Frank D. Benick



October 13, 2006              -------------------------------------------------
                              Frank D. Benick
                              Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original  of the  written  statement  required  by Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document  authenticating,  acknowledging or
otherwise  adopting  the  signature  that  appears  in typed  form  within  this
electronic  version of this written statement  required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished in accordance with Securities and
Exchange  Commission  Release  Nos.  34-47551  and  34-47986  and  shall  not be
considered "filed" as part of this 10-QSB.

This  certification  is made  solely for  purposes  of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,
subject  to the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and not for any other
purpose.


                                      -25-
No. 99-7840.

#### Kind, aka Swan *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**-  Northern Plains  
-  Cheyenne, WY / Ft Collins, CO (RRRU) 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search  UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">		You are here: 						Research / 																				**Research Project:**Low Altitude, High-Resolution Digital Aerial Photography, and Computer Enhanced Data Analysis for Monitoring Rangeland Resources
**Location: Cheyenne, WY / Ft Collins, CO (RRRU)**
**2006 Annual Report**
**4d.Progress report.**													This report documents work conducted under a Reimbursable Agreement between the USDA-ARS-RRRU at Cheyenne, WY, and the Wyoming State Office of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Additional details of research can be found in the report for the parent project, #5409-22660-002-00D Rangeland Ecosystems: Characterization, Management and Monitoring.
A series of seminars and workshops were held between January and July to report advancements accomplished under and earlier agreement, to demonstrate the image analysis software program SamplePoint, and to give land managers opportunity to use the program. One outcome of this has been the agreement of interested livestock operators having BLM allotments to test joint cooperative monitoring using ground photography. The photography will be collected by ranchers on their allotments. The measurement of ground cover (bare ground, litter, rock, and vegetation by lifeform) from the resulting images will use SamplePoint software and will be done by either ranchers or agency personnel and will be jointly re-examined in case of a question. In addition to the transfer of monitoring technology to users, we also completed aerial surveys on 400,000 acres of public land, have developed a protocol for data storage by the agency, and are in the process of developing protocols for using this data for long-term condition and trend analysis.						
    Project TeamBooth, D Terrance  
Project Annual Reports FY 2009 FY 2008 FY 2007 FY 2006 
Related National Programs Rangeland, Pasture, and Forages(215) Crop Protection & Quarantine(304)  							Last Modified: 05/10/2010 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries III, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: January 26, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, President

Big Sky Industries III, Inc.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cyber Digital, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.C. Chatpar, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ J.C. Chatpar

J.C. Chatpar

Chief Executive Officer and 

Chief Financial Officer

June 27, 2008
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 94 DB 2020 (No. 61 RST 2020)

:

LISA B. GREGORY : Attorney Registration No. 68295

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM INACTIVE STATUS : ( Out of State )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 10 th day of September

, 2020 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated August 28

, 2020

, is approved and it is ORDERED that

Lisa B. Gregory

, who has been on Inactive Status

, h as demonstrated that s he has the

moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in

the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of

the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation

and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner

.
# C_2017104EN.01000602.xml

| 3.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/6

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 January 2017 — Villeroy & Boch Austria GmbH v European Commission

(Case C-626/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Bathroom fittings and fixtures markets of Belgium, Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands and Austria - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area - Price coordination and exchange of sensitive business information - Single infringement - Proof - Fines - Unlimited jurisdiction - Reasonable time - Proportionality))

(2017/C 104/10)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Villeroy & Boch Austria GmbH (represented by: A. Reidlinger and J. Weichbrodt, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: M. Kellerbauer, L. Malferrari and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Villeroy & Boch Austria GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Villeroy & Boch Austria GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 39, 8.2.2014.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of eResource Capital Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
MICHAEL D. PRUITT, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: October 14, 2003

/s/ Michael D. Pruitt
------------------------------------
Michael D. Pruitt

Chief Executive Officer
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:FAA-2013-0212; Dir ID 2012-NM-116-AD
Lowry, Nick (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Dear Mr. Silberberg: 

Lowry, Nick (OST) -; l 

Tuesday, April 16, 2013 1:57 PM ·- . · · ' • · 

Robert P. Silverberg (rsilverberg@sgbdc.com); Don Hainbach (dhainbach@gghairlaw.com); Mike Borsetti (mike@borsetti.com) · -. , . : :, ::;: :~ Z 

Podberesky, Samuel (OST); Graber, Kimberly (OST); Gorman, Robert (OST); Arshad, 

Amna (OST) 

Yo~Ietter·"~f April 11, 2013 -- Documents filed by Mike Borsetti in DOT OST 

c:::~nd 2013-0025 

This is in response to your letter of April11, 2013, in which you state that three documents filed in Dkt OST 2013-0024 

by Mike Borsetti are documents unauthorized by the Department's procedural rules (14 CFR Part 302) and should not be 

accepted for filing. 

The documents are entitled: (1) "Complaint and Motion tc• Join Complaint," April 5, 2013; (2) "Comments in Support of 

· DOT Investigation into American Airlines," March 21, 2013; and "Comments in Support of DOT Investigation into 

American Airlines, Inc., and British Airways Pic and Request for Joint Investigation of Immunized Integrated Joint Venture 

Partners," March 21, 2013. 

While you are correct in pointing out the pleadings are not explicitly allowed under the Department' rules, we at the 

Enforcement Office have decided that we will accept them along with comments filed by members of the public in a 

related docket (DOT OST 2013-0025) in the interest of receptiveness to public comment and participation. We will 

accord them informal consideration in our review of the two dockets. As you point out, under rule 6(c)(3) the 

Department must consider matters contained in these documents as controverted and American need not answer the 

filings. 

I will place a copy ofthis e-mail in Dockets OST 2013-0024 and 2013-0025. 

Nicholas Lowry 

Senior Attorney 

Office of Aviation Enforcement & Proceedings 

Office of the General Counsel 

U.S. Dept. ofTransportation 

202-366-9351 (ph) 

1
!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

"}

Ocoee # 2 Dam

Ocoee # 3

Powerhouse

Ocoee Whitewater

Center

3

2

6

5 4

£¤64

1

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

!(

"}

Ocoee # 2 Dam

Ocoee # 3

Powerhouse

Ocoee Whitewater

Center

3

2

6

5 4

£¤64

1

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,00

F

0

eet /

Ocoee Reservoirs

Land Management Plan

Tile: a4

Aug 27, 2007

\\alismurphy\home\mprlm\projects\landplan\Maps\Ocoees_land_plan\Ocoees_land_plan_for_Web.mxd
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1207 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

30777 Rancho California Road in Temecula, California, as the ‘‘Dalip 

Singh Saund Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 9, 2005 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself and Mrs. BOXER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 30777 Rancho California Road in Temecula, 

California, as the ‘‘Dalip Singh Saund Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DALIP SINGH SAUND POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 30777 Rancho California Road 

6 in Temecula, California, shall be known and designated 

7 as the ‘‘Dalip Singh Saund Post Office Building’’. 
2 

•S 1207 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the Dalip Singh Saund 

5 Post Office Building. 

Æ
Cozy Haven

Davenport Hills

Cozy

Cove

Marina

\\alismurphy\home\mprlm\projects\landplan\maps\Nottely_land_plan\Nottely_land_plan_for_web.mxd

/

Tile: B1

Jul 24, 2008 Nottely Reservoir

Land Management Plan

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000

Feet
No. 48242.

#### Protests 614321-G, etc., of J. Elishewitz & Sons Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain items consist o'f hats known as harvest hats, similar to those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the protests were sustained as to that item.
#### William G. HELLER, III v. NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC SERVICE, INC.

No. 60562.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 27, 1977.

In re: New Orleans Public Service, Inc. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.
No. 65794.

#### Border Brokerage Company *v.*United States,

protests 59/4270, 59/8998, and 59/8963 (Seattle).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2014292EN.01000501.xml

| 1.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 June 2014 — Nexans SA, Nexans France v European Commission

(Case C-37/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Competition - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Administrative procedure - Inspection - Decision ordering an inspection - Obligation to state reasons - Reasonable grounds - Geographic market))

2014/C 292/05

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Nexans SA, Nexans France (represented by: M. Powell, Solicitor, J.-P. Tran-Thiet, avocat, G. Forwood, Barrister, and A. Rogers, Solicitor)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: R. Sauer, J. Bourke and N. von Lingen, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the appeal.

| 2) | Orders Nexans SA and Nexans France SAS to pay the costs of the present appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Nexans SA and Nexans France SAS to pay the costs of the present appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.

1

---
!(35

\\alismurphy\home\mprlm\projects\landplan\maps\Nottely_land_plan\Nottely_land_plan_for_web.mxd

/

Tile: A3

Jul 24, 2008 Nottely Reservoir

Land Management Plan

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000

Feet