A national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy

Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 

Innovation for Our Energy Future 

Wind Energy Status and Future 

Wind Engineering Challenges 

Preprint 

R. Thresher, S. Schreck, and M. Robinson 

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 

P. Veers 

Sandia National Laboratories

To be presented at the 1st American Association for Wind 

Engineering Workshop 

Vail, Colorado 

August 21–22, 2008 

Conference Paper 

NREL/CP-500-43799 

August 2008 

NREL is operated by Midwest Research Institute ● Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 
NOTICE

The submitted manuscript has been offered by an employee of the Midwest Research Institute (MRI), a 

contractor of the US Government under Contract No. DE-AC36-99GO10337. Accordingly, the US 

Government and MRI retain a nonexclusive royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of 

this contribution, or allow others to do so, for US Government purposes. 

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. 

Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any 

warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or 

usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not 

infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by 

trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, 

recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and 

opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States 

government or any agency thereof. 

Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/bridge

Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy 

and its contractors, in paper, from: 

U.S. Department of Energy 

Office of Scientific and Technical Information 

P.O. Box 62 

Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 

phone: 865.576.8401 

fax: 865.576.5728 

email: mailto:reports@adonis.osti.gov

Available for sale to the public, in paper, from: 

U.S. Department of Commerce 

National Technical Information Service 

5285 Port Royal Road 

Springfield, VA 22161 

phone: 800.553.6847 

fax: 703.605.6900 

email: orders@ntis.fedworld.gov

online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm

Printed on paper containing at least 50% wastepaper, including 20% postconsumer waste
Wind Energy Status and Future Wind Engineering Challenges1

Robert Thresher2, Scott Schreck3, Michael Robinson4, and Paul Veers 5

Introduction 

Wind energy is one of the fastest growing electrical energy sources in the United States. The United 

States installed more than 5,300 megawatts (MW) of new wind energy capacity in 2007, and experts 

are forecasting for as much, or more, to be installed in 2008. The cumulative installed capacity in the 

United States as of December 31, 2007, was 16,904 MW. The state distribution of wind capacity is 

illustrated in Figure 1. 

FIGURE 1. Installed wind capacity in the United States as of December 31, 2007.

 

1

 This work has been authored by an employee or employees of the Midwest Research Institute under Contract No. DEAC36-99GO10337 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by 

accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, 

irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for United 

States Government purposes. 

2

 Wind Energy Research Fellow, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden Colorado, USA; Telephone: 01-303-384-

6922; e-mail: Robert_Thresher@nrel.gov. 3

 Principal Engineer, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden Colorado, USA; Telephone: 01-303-384-7102; e-mail: 

Scott_Schreck@nrel.gov. 4

 Deputy Director of the National Wind Technology Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden Colorado, 

USA; Telephone: 01-303-384-6947; e-mail: Mike_Robinson@nrel.gov. 5

 Distinguished Member Technical Staff, Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory operated by Sandia 

Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC04-

94AL85000. 

1 
The United States is blessed with an abundance of wind energy potential. The land-based and offshore 

wind resources are estimated to be sufficient to supply the electrical energy needs of the entire country 

several times over. The Midwest region, from Texas to North Dakota, is particularly rich in wind 

energy resources, as illustrated in Figure 2. Wind capacity in the United States and in Europe has 

grown at a rate of 20% to 30% per year over the past decade. Yet, despite this rapid growth, wind only 

provides for about 1% of total electricity consumption in the United States. 

FIGURE 2. The land-based and offshore wind resource potential at 50 m.

The Current Status of Wind Energy Technology in the United States

During the past 20 years, average wind turbine ratings have grown almost linearly, as shown in Figure 

3. Current commercial machines are rated at 1.5 MW to 2.5 MW. Each group of wind turbine 

designers predicted that their machines were as large as they will ever be. However, with each new 

generation of wind turbines, the size has increased along the linear curve and has achieved reductions 

in life-cycle cost of energy. 

The long-term drive to develop larger turbines stems from a desire to take advantage of wind shear by 

placing rotors in the higher, much more energetic winds at greater elevations above ground (wind 

speed increases with height above the ground). This is a major reason that the capacity factor of wind 

turbines installed in the United States has increased over time, as documented by Wiser and Bolinger

(1), and shown in Figure 4. However, there are constraints to this continued growth; in general, it 

costs more to build a larger turbine. 

The primary argument for a size limit for wind turbines is based on the “square-cube law.” Roughly 

stated, it says that “as a wind turbine rotor increases in size, its energy output increases as the rotorswept area (the diameter squared), while the volume of material, and therefore its mass and cost, 

increases as the cube of the diameter.” In other words, at some size the cost for a larger turbine will 

grow faster than the resulting energy output revenue, making scaling a losing economic game. 

2 
Engineers have successfully skirted this law by changing the design rules with increasing size and 

removing material or by using material more efficiently to trim weight and cost. 

The WindPACT blade scaling study (2) shows that in recent years, blade mass has been scaling at 

roughly an exponent of 2.3 instead of the expected 3. The study also shows how successive 

generations of blade design have moved off the cubic weight growth curve to keep weight down as 

illustrated in Figure 5. 

FIGURE 3. The development path and size growth of wind turbines. 

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

2007 Capacity Factor

 Capacity-Weighted Average 2007 Capacity Factor, by COD

 Individual Project 2007 Capacity Factor, by COD

 Pre-1998 1998-99 2000-01 2002-03 2004-05 2006

20 projects 21 projects 26 projects 25 projects 26 projects 17 projects

 936 MW 892 MW 1,743 MW 1,911 MW 2,669 MW 2,225 MW

Source: Berkeley Lab database

FIGURE 4. Project capacity factors for 2007 by commercial operation date (1).

3 
FIGURE 5. WindPACT study(2) results indicate lower growth rates in blade weight 

as a result of new technologies.

If advanced research and development provides better design methods, as well as new materials and 

manufacturing methods that allow the entire turbine to scale as the diameter squared, it would be 

possible to continue to innovate around this limit to size. 

Land transportation constraints can also pose limiting factors to wind turbine growth. Cost-effective 

transportation can only be achieved by remaining within standard over-the-road trailer dimensions of 

4.1 m high by 2.6 m wide. Rail transportation is even more dimensionally limited. 

The Cost of Wind-Generated Electricity in the United States 

The cost of wind-generated electricity has dropped dramatically since 1980, when the first commercial 

wind plants began operation in California. Figure 6 depicts price data from public records for some 

more recent wind energy projects. This chart shows that in 2006, the price paid for electricity 

generated in large wind plants was between 3 and 6.5 cents per kilowatt-hour (kWh) with an average 

near 5 cents per kWh (1cent/kWh = 10$/MWh). These figures represent the electricity price as sold by 

a wind plant owner to the utility. The price includes the benefit of the federal production tax credit and 

any state incentives, as well as revenue from the sale of any renewable energy credits. Thus the true 

cost of the delivered electricity would be higher by approximately 2 cents per kWh, which is the value 

of the federal tax credit. The unsubsidized cost for wind-generated electricity for projects completed in 

2006 ranges from about 5 to 81⁄2 cents per kWh. 

The reasons generally offered for the currently increasing price of wind-generated electricity after the 

long downward price trend of the past 25 years include: 

 Turbine and component shortages due to the dramatic recent growth of the wind industry in the 

United States and Europe 

 The weakening U.S. dollar relative to the Euro (because many major turbine components are 

imported from Europe) and relatively few wind turbine component manufacturers in the United 

States 

 A significant rise in material costs such as steel and copper, as well as transportation fuels, over 

the past 3 years 

4 
 The on-again and off-again cycle of the wind energy production tax credit, which hinders 

investment in new turbine production facilities and encourages hurried and expensive 

production, transportation, and installation of projects when the tax credit is available. 

Reducing wind energy costs to below the 2003 level will require further research and development 

efforts and will be considered later. 

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Wind Power Price (2007 $/MWh)

 Cumulative Capacity-Weighted Average Wind Pow er Price (+/- 1 standard deviation)

7 projects 10 projects 19 projects 35 projects 55 projects 67 projects 86 projects 88 projects 105 projects

 450 MW 562 MW 690 MW 1,572 MW 2,461 MW 3,262 MW 4,386 MW 5,682 MW 8,090 MW

Source: Berkeley Lab database

Sample includes projects built from 1998-2007

FIGURE 6. Wind energy price by commercial operation date (1).

Potential Growth of Wind Energy in the United States

The vision of the wind industry in the United States and in Europe is to increase wind’s fraction of the 

electrical energy mix to more than 20% within the next two decades. Recently, the U.S. Department 

of Energy in conjunction with American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), the National Renewable 

Energy Laboratory (NREL), Sandia National Laboratories, and Black & Veatch, published a study4

that explores the possibility of producing 20% of the nation’s electricity using wind energy. The study 

estimates all aspects of the 20% wind scenario, including the wind resource assessment, materials and 

manufacturing resources, environmental and siting issues, transmission and system integration, and 

public policy. It should be noted that several states have Renewable Electricity Standards that 

mandate comparable levels of renewable energy be deployed within the next 20 years. 

The Wind Energy Deployment System model (3) developed at NREL was used to estimate the 

consequences of producing 20% of the nation’s electricity from wind technology by 2030. This 

generation and transmission capacity expansion model selects from electricity generation technologies 

that include pulverized coal plants, combined cycle natural gas plants, combustion turbine natural gas 

plants, nuclear plants, and wind technology to meet projected demand in future years. Technology cost 

and performance projections, as well as transmission operation and expansion costs, are assumed. This 

study demonstrates that producing 20% of the nation’s projected electricity demand in 2030 from wind 

technology is technically feasible, not cost-prohibitive, and provides benefits in the forms of carbon 

emission reductions, natural gas fuel savings, and water savings. 

The United States possesses more than 8,000 gigawatts (GW) of wind resources that could be 

harnessed to produce electricity at reasonable cost if transmission expenditures are excluded. 

Considering some elements of the transmission required to access these resources, a supply curve that 

shows the relationship between wind power class and cost is shown in Figure 7, taken from reference 

(4). It includes the cost of accessing the current transmission system and shows that more than 600 

GW of potential wind capacity is available for $60 to $100/MWh, without the production tax credit. 

5 
The relatively flat supply curve for wind energy clearly shows an abundance of modestly priced wind 

energy is available in the United States, even with limited transmission access. 

 

FIGURE 7. Wind energy supply curve for the 20% wind scenario modeling. 

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

2000

2006

2012

2018

2024

2030

Annual Generation (%) 

0

5

10

15

20

Annual Installed Capacity (GW)

Annual Generation (left scale)

Annual Capacity (right scale)

FIGURE 8. Prescribed annual wind generation and capacity additions 

6 
Figure 8 shows the wind capacity expansion necessary to reach 20% electricity generation by 2030. 

This trajectory was designed to produce an aggressive annual growth rate that reached a sustainable 

level of manufacturing by accounting for both demand growth and the repowering of aging wind 

plants. Based on the assumptions used in this study, the wind industry would need to grow from an 

annual installation rate of 5 GW/year in 2007 to a sustained rate of about 15 GW/year by 2018, which 

is a threefold growth over the next decade. 

The scenario assumes a modest improvement of wind technology over the 20-year modeling period. 

Wind turbine costs are assumed to decrease by 10% to 12% between 2010 and 2030, and wind turbine 

performance, or capacity factor, is assumed to increase by 15 % from today’s capacity factors of 35% 

by the year 2030. 

Offshore Wind Energy Potential 

U.S. offshore wind energy resources are abundant, indigenous, and broadly dispersed among the most 

expensive and highly constrained electric load centers. The DOE Energy Information Administration 

shows that 28 of the 48 contiguous states with coastal boundaries use 78% of the nation’s electricity. 

In the United States, approximately 10 offshore projects totaling more than 2,400 MW are being 

considered for locations that span both state and federal waters. 

Offshore turbines being considered for deployment range from 3 MW to 5 MW in size and typically 

have three-bladed horizontal-axis upwind rotors that are nominally 80 m to 126 m in diameter. Tower 

heights offshore are lower than land-based turbines because wind shear profiles are less steep, 

tempering the energy capture gains sought with increased elevation. The foundations for offshore wind 

turbines differ substantially from land-based turbines. Current estimates indicate that the cost of 

energy from these offshore wind plants is more than 10 cents/kWh and that the operation and 

maintenance costs are also higher than for land-based turbines due to the difficulty of accessing 

turbines during storm conditions. 

The high cost of offshore wind energy and the need to develop a new regulatory process for permitting 

this unique technology has greatly slowed offshore wind development. Currently, there are no 

operating offshore wind plants in the United States. It is expected that during the next 5 years, one or 

more offshore wind farms will be deployed in the United States. They will be installed in shallow 

water and will supply electricity to nearby onshore utilities that serve large population centers. If they 

are successful, the technology will develop more rapidly. Most coastlines of the United States have 

much deeper water, and the shallow water technologies currently used for offshore installations in 

Europe will not be applicable. Therefore, the path toward deepwater floating systems must be 

supported by an extensive R&D program for at least a decade. For more information on the viability of 

offshore wind energy see reference (5). 

Potential Future Turbine Technology Improvements 

The DOE Wind Energy Program has conducted cost studies under the WindPACT Project that 

identified a number of areas where technology advances would result in changes to the capital cost, 

annual energy production, reliability, operations and maintenance, and balance of station. Many of 

these potential improvements, summarized in Table 1, would have significant impacts on annual 

energy production and capital cost. Table 1 also includes the manufacturing learning-curve effect 

generated by several doublings of turbine manufacturing output over the coming years. The learningcurve effect on capital cost reduction is assumed to range from zero in a worst-case scenario to the 

historic level in a best-case scenario, with the most likely outcome halfway in between. The most 

probable scenario is a sizeable increase in capacity factor with a modest drop in capital cost from the 

2002 levels. 

 

7 
Table 1: Areas of Potential Technology Improvement 

Technical Area Potential Advances 

Cost Increments 

(Best/Expected/Least, Percent) 

Annual Energy 

Production Turbine Capital Cost 

Advanced Tower Concepts 

* Taller towers in difficult locations 

* New materials and/or processes 

* Advanced structures/foundations 

* Self-erecting, initial or for service 

+11/+11/+11 +8/+12/+20 

Advanced (Enlarged) Rotors 

* Advanced materials 

* Improved structural-aero design 

* Active controls 

* Passive controls 

* Higher tip speed/lower acoustics 

+35/+25/+10 -6/-3/+3 

Reduced Energy Losses and 

Improved Availability 

* Reduced blade soiling losses 

* Damage tolerant sensors 

* Robust control systems 

* Prognostic maintenance 

+7/+5/0 0/0/0 

Drivetrain 

(Gearboxes and Generators 

and Power Electronics) 

* Fewer gear stages or direct drive 

* Medium/low-speed generators 

* Distributed gearbox topologies 

* Permanent-magnet generators 

* Medium-voltage equipment 

* Advanced gear tooth profiles 

* New circuit topologies 

* New semiconductor devices 

* New materials (GaAs, SiC) 

+8/+4/0 -11/-6/+1 

Manufacturing and Learning 

Curve 

* Sustained, incremental design and 

process improvements 

* Large-scale manufacturing 

* Reduced design loads 

0/0/0 -27/-13/-3 

Totals +61/+45/+21 -36/-10/+21 

Footnote: Since the 2002 baseline, there has been a sizeable improvement in capacity factor―from just over 30% to almost 

35%―while capital costs have increased due to large increases in commodity costs and a drop in the value of the dollar (1). 

Therefore, working from a 2006 baseline, we can expect a more modest increase in capacity factor. The 10% capital cost 

reduction is still possible, although beginning from a higher 2007 starting point, because commodity prices are unlikely to 

drop back to 2002 levels.

Future Science and Wind Engineering Challenges 

The very significant wind energy technology improvements and related cost reductions described 

above have been primarily enabled by the application of improved engineering analysis and design 

techniques transferred from related engineering fields combined with empirical relationships 

developed from laboratory and field testing of each new wind turbine component and system 

developed. However, wind energy technology has matured to a point where it will be difficult to 

sustain this rapid rate of improvement without a major advancement in our fundamental understanding 

of the basic physical processes underlying wind energy science and engineering. There are 

fundamental knowledge barriers to further progress in virtually all aspects of wind energy engineering. 

These barriers include our fundamental understanding of: atmospheric flows, unsteady aerodynamics 

and stall, turbine dynamics and stability, turbine wake flows and related array effects, and even 

climate effects caused by the large-scale use of wind energy. 

To better understand these challenges and barriers a Research Needs for Wind Resource 

Characterization workshop, organized by DOE’s Office of Biological and Environmental Research 

and Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, was conducted January 14 – 16, 2008, in 

Broomfield, Colorado. This workshop had two purposes. First, it brought together select researchers 

from the atmospheric science and wind energy engineering communities to identify and describe the 

most important challenges. Second, it solicited recommendations from these experts regarding 

productive approaches for the two communities to work together to address these barriers through a 

8 
possible future DOE research effort. The workshop was attended by more than 120 atmospheric 

science and wind energy researchers from industry, academia, and federal laboratories in North 

America and Europe. For a more detailed account of the workshop results see reference (6). 

To provide a framework for the workshop, four focus areas covering the fundamental challenges were 

delineated: 1) Turbine Dynamics, 2) Micrositing and Array Effects, 3) Mesoscale Processes, and 4) 

Climate Effects. These areas were introduced in four plenary presentations delivered by 

internationally recognized experts representing these fields. Participants then joined one of three 

problem definition breakout groups to address these focus areas. Each group included participants 

from the atmospheric science and wind energy engineering communities to promote knowledge 

exchange between the two. After the problem definition groups had addressed each of the four focus 

areas, participants then joined one of four recommendation breakout groups aligned with their 

individual expertise to distill the problem definition discussions into a cohesive set of research thrust 

recommendations. 

Workshop discussions made it clear that research in each of the four focus areas had developed in 

relative isolation from the others. The nonlinear fluid mechanic character underlying these areas 

compelled this separation to achieve computational tractability, and the physical separation in spatial 

and temporal scales generally facilitated the current success of this separation. However, one major 

theme that emerged from the workshop was that continued progress in wind energy technology would 

require interdisciplinary reunification with the atmospheric sciences to exploit previously untapped 

synergies. A second major theme that emerged from the workshop was the need to apply experiments 

and observations in a coordinated fashion with computation and theory. In addition to these two 

comprehensive recommendations that were common to all four focus areas, specific recommendations 

were delineated for each focus area. 

In the Turbine Dynamics focus area, detailed characterizations of inflows and turbine flow fields were 

deemed crucial to attaining the accuracy levels in aerodynamics loads that will be required for future 

machine designs. To effectively address the complexities inherent in this area, an incremental 

approach involving hierarchical computational modeling and detailed measurements was 

recommended, wherein the isolated turbine would be considered initially, and then the ingestion of a 

wake trailed from an upwind turbine would be addressed. In addition, a third thrust was recommended 

that would entail modeling extreme and anomalous atmospheric inflow events, as well as the 

aerostructural response of turbines immersed in these events. 

The Micrositing and Array Effects focus area considered improved wake models to be important for 

more accurately characterizing energy capture losses and higher turbulence downwind of large 

multiple-row wind plants. Planetary boundary layer research was deemed necessary to achieve 

accurate, reliable determination of the inflow mean structure and turbulence statistics in the presence 

of various atmospheric stability conditions and complex land-surface characteristics. Finally, a 

requirement was identified for acquiring and exploiting large-scale wind inflow datasets for model 

verification, which will need to cover heights to 200 m and satisfy high spatial and temporal resolution 

requirements tailored to wind energy’s unique needs. 

The Mesoscale Processes focus area deemed improvements in fundamental understanding of 

mesoscale and local flows crucial to providing enhanced model outputs suited for wind energy 

production forecasts and wind plant siting. This improved understanding would be exploited by 

developing wind forecasting technologies well suited to wind plant siting and operations. Modeling 

approaches must be developed to resolve spatial scales in the 100-m to 1000-m range, a notable gap in 

current capabilities. Validation of these models will require development and deployment of new 

instruments and observational strategies, including additional analyses of existing measurements and 

additional longer-term measurements. 

In the focus area of Climate Effects, theoretical, numerical, and observational work was recommended 

to identify and understand historic trends in the variability of wind resources to increase confidence in 

9 
resource estimation for future planning and validation. For the same reasons, similarly multifaceted 

research was suggested to improve quantification of future changes in the mean and variability of 

wind climate and resources. Workshop participants also considered it important to characterize 

interactions between wind plants and local/regional/global climates through modeling and 

observations aimed at the physical link between wind plants and atmospheric boundary layer 

dynamics. 

High-penetration wind energy deployment to meet long-range U.S. energy goals represents a daunting 

though attainable and crucial national objective. Meeting these goals will require an unprecedented 

ability to characterize the operation of large wind turbines deployed in gigawatt-scale wind plants that 

extract elevated energy levels from the planetary boundary layer. Success will demand accurate, 

reliable modeling computations and experimental measurements across an expansive scale that 

extends from microns to kilometers, as illustrated in Figure 9. Assets residing within the DOE 

national laboratory complex allied with researchers from industry and academia represent a formidable 

capability for realizing these objectives. Together, these resources will lay the foundations for a 

challenging collaborative research agenda of wind resource characterization in support of aggressive 

wind energy deployment to meet strategic U.S. energy needs. 

10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 104 105 106

Turbine Wake Turbulence Regional Flows 

Airfoil Turbulence Terrain Flows Global Flows 

Δx(m)

FIGURE 9. Wind energy computational scales range more than 10 orders of magnitude from the scale of 

airfoil generated turbulence, to rotor wake scales, to terrain flows, and then global scale flow. 

SUMMARY 

Power production from wind technology has evolved very rapidly over the past decade. Capital costs 

have plummeted, reliability has improved, and efficiency has dramatically increased, resulting in a 

robust commercial market product that is competitive with conventional power generation. 

Investments in R&D as well as the development of robust standard design criteria have helped to 

mitigate technology risk and attract market capital for development and deployment of large 

commercial wind plants. High-quality products are provided by every major turbine manufacturer, and 

complete wind generation plants are now being engineered to seamlessly interconnect with the grid 

infrastructure to provide utilities with dependable energy supply without the risks of future fuel price 

escalation inherent in conventional generation. 

10 
11 

The cost-of-energy metric remains the principal technology indicator, incorporating the key elements 

of capital cost, efficiency, reliability, and durability. The unsubsidized (without the 2 cents/kWh PTC) 

cost of wind-generated electricity ranges from about 5 to 8.5 cents/kWh for projects completed in 

2007 (1). No major technical breakthroughs in land-based technology are needed for a broad 

geographic penetration of wind power on the electric grid. No single component improvement in cost 

or efficiency can achieve significant cost reductions or dramatically improved performance. Capacity 

factor can be increased incrementally over time using enlarged rotors on taller towers. Market 

incentives are necessary to sustain near-term industry growth, but in the longer term, subsidies can 

probably be eliminated. 

Major technology improvements require a systems development and integration approach with 

commensurate advancement in our fundamental understanding of the basic physical processes 

underlying wind energy science and engineering. This new physical understanding is needed to 

enhance our modeling capabilities in turbine dynamics, micrositing, mesoscale modeling for siting and 

forecasting, and to improve our prediction of larger scale climate effects. In addition, with continued 

R&D, offshore wind energy has great potential to allow the United States to greatly expand its 

electrical energy supply. 

References 

1. Wiser, R.; Bolinger, M. (2007). Annual Report on U.S. Wind Power Installation, Cost, and 

Performance Trends: 2007, May 2008. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable 

Energy; DOE/GO-102008-2590. Available at www.osti.gov/bridge. 

2. Griffin, D. A. (2001). WindPACT Turbine Design Scaling Studies Technical Area 1 -- Composite 

Blades for 80- to 120-Meter Rotor. 44 pp.; National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO. 

NREL Report No. SR-500-29492. Available at www.nrel.gov/publications/

3. Short, W.; Blair, N.; Heimiller, D.; and Singh, V. (2003). Modeling the Long-Term Market 

Penetration of Wind in the United States, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 

NREL/CP-620-34469. Available at www.nrel.gov/publications/

4. U.S. Department of Energy (2008). 20% Wind Energy by 2030: Increasing Wind Energy’s 

Contribution to the U.S. Electricity Supply. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO. 

NREL Report No. NREL/SR-500-41869; DOE/GO-102008-2567. Available at 

www.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro 

5. Musial, W.; “Offshore Wind Electricity: A Viable Energy Option for Coastal USA,” Marine 

Technology Society Journal, Volume 41(3), Fall 2007; pp. 32-43; National Renewable Energy 

Laboratory, Golden, CO. NREL Report NO. NREL/JA-500-41338. Available at 

www.nrel.gov/publications/ 

6. Schreck, S., Lundquist, J., and Shaw, W. (2008) U.S. Department of Energy Workshop Report: 

Research Needs for Wind Resource Characterization. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 

Golden, CO, NREL/TP-500-43521 June 2008. Available at www.nrel.gov/publications/
F1147-E(09/2007) 

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved 

OMB No. 0704-0188

The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, 

gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this 

collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Executive Services and Communications Directorate (0704-0188). Respondents 

should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a 

currently valid OMB control number. 

PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ORGANIZATION.

1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY)

August 2008 

2. REPORT TYPE

Conference paper 

3. DATES COVERED (From - To)

August 21 - 22, 2008 

4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE

Wind Energy Status and Future Wind Engineering Challenges: 

Preprint 

5a. CONTRACT NUMBER

DE-AC36-99-GO10337 

5b. GRANT NUMBER

5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER

6. AUTHOR(S)

R. Thresher, S. Schreck, M. Robinson, P. Veers 

5d. PROJECT NUMBER

NREL/CP-500-43799 

5e. TASK NUMBER

WER8.2006 

5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER

7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 

1617 Cole Blvd. 

Golden, CO 80401-3393 

8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION

REPORT NUMBER

NREL/CP-500-43799 

9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S)

NREL 

11. SPONSORING/MONITORING

AGENCY REPORT NUMBER

12. DISTRIBUTION AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

National Technical Information Service 

U.S. Department of Commerce 

5285 Port Royal Road 

Springfield, VA 22161 

13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

14. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 Words)

This paper describes the current status of wind energy technology, the potential for future wind energy development 

and the science and engineering challenges that must be overcome for the technology to meet its potential. 

15. SUBJECT TERMS

wind energy technology; wind energy development; wind turbine design 

16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION 

OF ABSTRACT

UL 

18. NUMBER 

OF PAGES 

19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON 

a. REPORT 

Unclassified 

b. ABSTRACT 

Unclassified

c. THIS PAGE 

Unclassified 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code)

Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8/98) 

Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39.18