alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

The Company has computed and presented  earnings per share ("EPS") in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128.  Reconciliation of the
numerators and the  denominators of the basic and diluted per share  computation
for net income are as follows:

<table>
<caption>
                                                              (amounts in thousands, except per share data)
                                                                               (unaudited)

                                                                 Income          Shares        Per-Share
                                                               (Numerator)    (Denominator)      Amount
                                                               ------------   -------------   ------------

                                                            <c>                    <c>     <c>
Three months ended March 31, 2007
   Basic EPS
      Net income and income available to common shareholders   $        934           1,684   $        .55
      Effect of dilutive securities, options                                              0
                                                               ------------   -------------
   Diluted EPS
      Income available to common shareholders and assumed
         conversions                                           $        934           1,684   $        .55
                                                               ============   =============
Three months ended March 31, 2006
   Basic EPS
      Net income and income available to common shareholders   $      1,147           1,683   $        .68
      Effect of dilutive securities, options                                              0
                                                               ------------   -------------
   Diluted EPS
      Income available to common shareholders and assumed
         conversions                                           $      1,147           1,683   $        .68
                                                               ============   =============

</table>
#### George W. WYATT, d/b/a Wyatt’s Firestone Store v. RED BALL MOTOR FREIGHT, INC.

No. 59738.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 1977.

In re: Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, 343 So.2d 324, Second Circuit, Parish of Jackson.

Writ refused. Under the facts found by the court of appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.

DENNIS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
August 22, 1938

No. 39260.

Suit 4077.

#### *U. Fujita & Co. et al.*v. *United States.*

Abstract 35198 affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
                                EXHIBIT 21.01

                       LIST OF WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES
                         RATIONAL SOFTWARE CORPORATION

NAME                                            JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
-------------------------------------------     -------------------------------
Rational International                          California

Performance Awareness Corporation               North Carolina

Requisite, Inc.                                 Colorado

SQA Holdings, Inc.                              Delaware

Rational Software Corporation Limited,
 Incorporated                                   United Kingdom

Rational SARL                                   France

Rational GmbH                                   Germany

Rational Software Scandinavia AB                Sweden

SoftLab AB                                      Sweden

Rational Software Pty Ltd.                      Australia

Rational Software Korea Limited                 Korea

Rational Software Do Brasil Ltda.               Brazil

Rational Software Corporation Pvt. Ltd.         India

Rational Software New Zealand Limited           New Zealand
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
333-32869, 33-46735, 33-46734 and 33-30058 of Terra Industries Inc. and
subsidiaries on Forms S-8 and Registration Statements Nos. 2-90808, 2-84876,
2-84669 and 333-68766 of Terra Industries Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-3 of
our reports dated January 31, 2002, appearing in and incorporated by reference
in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Terra Industries Inc. and subsidiaries for
the year ended December 31, 2001.





DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Omaha, Nebraska
March 26, 2002
No. 48288.

#### Protests 695748-G, etc., of Henry Pollak, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the items in question are similar to those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). Those imported or withdrawn for consumption prior to the date of said trade agreement were held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5), and those imported or withdrawn subsequent to said date were held dutiable at 12^ percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) as claimed.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00183-CV

JOHN BRADLEY ASHBURN AND POST 

OAK APPALACHIA, LLC, Appellants

V.

ROBERT J. MYERS, JOHN J. SHAW, AND 

MYERS SHAW, Appellees

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 17th District 

Court

of Tarrant County (017-315749-20)

April 1, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in part of the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the 

trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part. We reverse the trial court’s 

judgment as to the amount of attorney’s fees and remand this case to the trial court 

for a hearing on the issue of fee segregation and to determine what fee Appellees 

should receive. We affirm the remainder of the trial court’s judgment.
It is further ordered that Appellants John Bradley Ashburn and Post Oak 

Appalachia, LLC shall pay all of the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

 Justice Dabney Bassel
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 28, 2018

d0927 

# Order

Clerk September 28, 2018

157430

MARY WIEGAND, Personal Representative of

the Estate of KEITH WIEGAND,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 157430

COA: 334598

Macomb CC: 2014

- 002700

- NH

HIROSHI YAMASAKI, M.D., EASTSIDE

CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, PC, KISHAN

K. JASTI, M.D., and OSAMA N. NUNU, M.D.,

Defendants,

and

ST. JOHN HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 2017

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Certification of Principal Financial Officer**

 

I, Usama Malik, certify that:

 

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Immunomedics, Inc.; and

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: December 6, 2018

 
| /s/ Usama Malik               |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| Usama Malik                   |   |
| Principal Financial   Officer |   |

 

----
**JUN**
               OCT
				**MAY**15**2007**
               2008
				**2012****11 captures**
           22 Apr 05 - 31 Mar 12
   Close
       Help


**Shawano County**

Home

Return to Maps Page

County Map in PDF format

Click the name of the Waterfowl Production Area 
  below to see its map.







>
**Exhibit      32.2**

**Certification      of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley      Act of 2002**

**(i)**
**(ii)**

|                              |   |                                                        |
|-----------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |   | **WESTSTAR                FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION**  |
|                              |   |                                                        |
|                              |   |                                                        |
| Date:                May 12, 2006 | By:    | /s/Randall                C. Hall                           |
|                              |   |                                                        |
|                              |   | Randall                C. Hall                              |
|                              |   | Executive                Vice President and Chief Financial |
|                              |   | and                Principal Accounting Officer             |
(Reap. Dec. 9975)

#### Samuel Riba, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 39759, etc.

(Decided April 13, 1961)

*Siegel, Man Jell & Davidson*for tbe plaintiffs.

*William H. Orriclo, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, are before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between tbe parties hereto, subject to tbe approval of tbe Court, that tbe merchandise and tbe issues in tbe Appeals to Reappraisement enumerated on tbe Schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof are tbe same in all material respects as tbe merchandise and tbe issues decided in tbe case of *Paramount Import Co., Inc. et al.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dee. 9697, and that tbe record in said case be incorporated and made a part of tbe record herein.

> *660IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appraised values of the merchandise covered by the Appeals to Reappraisement enumerated on the schedule attached, less the additions made 'by the importer on entry because of advances by the Appraiser in similar cases, is equal to the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United 'States, and that there was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise.

In the incorporated case, I held that a charge of 15 per centum, ' paid by the American importer to a foreign commissionaire for services rendered in connection with the purchase of merchandise in the foreign market and which amount did not inure to the benefit of the seller, was a *bona fide*buying commission that did not enter into the dutiable value of the merchandise.

On the agreed facts and following my cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and hold that such statutory value therefor is the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
**JUN**
               May
				**OCT**12**2007**
               2009
				2010**13 captures**
           22 Apr 05 - 27 Jan 10
   Close
       Help


**Waushara County**

Home

Return to Maps Page

County Map in PDF format

Click the name of the Waterfowl Production Area 
  below to see its map.



Aerial 
    Map  Topo 
    Map  3D 
    Map




>
Exhibit 10.42b


      AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO 1992 STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT



      This Amendment No. 2 to  the  Stock Option Agreement dated as
of February 25, 1992, as  amended  by Amendment No. 1 thereto dated
as of April 1, 1996 (collectively  the "Agreement"), is made by and
between Peter  J.  Ratican  (the  "Executive")  and Maxicare Health
Plans, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") and dated as of
February 16, 1997 (the "Amendment No. 2").

      WHEREAS,  Executive  wishes  to  exercise  the  Stock  Option
granted to him pursuant to the Agreement;

      WHEREAS, certain  issues  have  arisen  with  respect  to the
notice and exercise provisions of Section 4(a) of the Agreement and
the computation of taxes due by  the Executive as a result thereof;
and

      WHEREAS, as a result  of  the  foregoing, the Company and the
Executive desire to make  certain  changes  to the Agreement as set
forth herein;

      NOW THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of  the  foregoing and the
mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, Executive and the
Company hereby agree as follows:


      1.   Section 4(a)  of  the  Agreement  is  hereby  amended as
follows:

           (a)  to delete on the second  and third line thereof "at
least three, but no more than ten, business days' prior" and add in
lieu thereof the following:

                "on the date of exercise";

           (b)  to  add  on  the   fourth  line  of  the  carryover
paragraph on page 3 after "accompanied by a" the following:

                "personal,"; and

           (c)  to delete on the  fifth  through the eighth line of
the first  full  paragraph  on  page  3  the  parenthetical  in its
entirety, as follows:

                "(or, if so  requested  in  the notice to exercise,
registered in the name of the Executive and another person jointly,
with right of survivorship)".

                           183 of 193

<PAGE>

      2.   Except as expressly set  forth  herein, all of the terms
and conditions contained  in  the  Agreement  shall  remain in full
force and effect.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement has
been executed as of the date first above-written.


                           MAXICARE HEALTH PLANS, INC.


                           /s/ ROBERT J. LANDIS
                           --------------------
                               Robert J. Landis
                                  Treasurer


                           EXECUTIVE


                           /s/ PETER J. RATICAN
                           ------------------------------------
                               Peter J. Ratican
                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

                           184 of 193
Exhibit 23



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-105845) of Wayne Savings Bancshares,  Inc. of our
report dated June 9, 2006,  appearing in this Annual  Report of Form 11-K of the
Wayne Savings 401(k)  Retirement Plan included in this Annual Report (Form 11-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2005.


/s/GRANT THORNTON LLP


Cincinnati, Ohio
June 28, 2006
DISMISSED; Opinion Filed April 3, 2019.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01469
- CV STACY HAMPTON , Appellant

V. SIR BELMONT APTS. LL C , Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 18
- 06027
- D 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Partida

- Kipness, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Partida

- Kipness The clerk’s record in this case is past due. By letter dated January 30, 2019, w e informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s
record or to provide written documentation appellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs within ten days

. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. That notice was returne d to the court as undeliverable. The clerk’s office then left appellant a voice message directing appellant to update her mailing address. To date, appellant has not prov ided the required documentation, updated her mailing address, or otherwise correspon ded with the Court regard ing the status of this appeal.– 2

–

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b) , (c)

.

181469F.P05 /Robbie Partida

- Kipness/ ROBBIE PARTIDA

- KIPNESS JUSTICE– 3

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT
STACY HAMPTON, Appellant
No. 05

- 18

- 01469

- CV V. SIR BELMONT APTS. LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 18

- 06027

- D. Opinion delivered by J ustice Partida

Kipness. Justices Bridges and Carlyle participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee SIR BELMONT APTS. LLC recover its costs of this appeal from appellant STACY HAMPTON.
Judgment entered this 3 rd day of April, 2019.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 2, 2018

s0924

Order 

Clerk

October 2, 2018

156840

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 156840

COA: 338902

Macomb CC: 2014-001984-FC

MICHAEL EDWARD LOFTIS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 17, 2017 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Global Earth Energy, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending May 31, 2014, I, Edmund J. Gorman, Chief Financial Officer of Global Earth Energy, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending May 31, 2014, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending May 31, 2014, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global Earth Energy, Inc.

Date: July 21, 2014.

/s/ Sydney A. Harland





Sydney A. Harland



Chief Executive Officer of Global Earth Energy, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 149 (Monday, August 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20477]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

[Docket 37554]


Notice of Order Adjusting the Standard Foreign Fare Level Index

    Section 41509(e) of Title 49 of the United States Code requires 
that the Department, as successor to the Civil Aeronautics Board, 
establish a Standard Foreign Fare Level (SFFL) by adjusting the SFFL 
base periodically by percentage changes in actual operating costs per 
available seat-mile (ASM). Order 80-2-69 established the first interim 
SFFL, and Order 97-6-3 established the currently effective two-month 
SFFL applicable through July 31, 1997.
    In establishing the SFFL for the two-month period beginning August 
1, 1997, we have projected non-fuel costs based on the year ended March 
31, 1997 data, and have determined fuel prices on the basis of the 
latest available experienced monthly fuel cost levels as reported to 
the Department.
    By Order 97-7-32 fares may be increased by the following adjustment 
factors over the October 1979 level:

Atlantic--1.3569
Latin America--1.4045
Pacific--1.4957

    For further information contact: Keith A. Shangraw (202) 366-2439.

    By the Department of Transportation.
    Dated: July 30, 1997.
Charles A. Hunnicutt,
Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 97-20477 Filed 8-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OF FLIGHTSERV.COM FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,486,221
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  914,096
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       8,516,319
<DEPRECIATION>                                 101,874
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,492,415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,263,729
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,905,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,492,415
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               602,026
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,325,577
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             334,226
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,967,777)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (4,967,777)
<DISCONTINUED>                             (11,205,233)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (16,173,010)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>