alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### WAC 

## 463-39-005 ADOPTION BY REFERENCE.. (1) 

## The energy facility site evaluation council adopts the following sections or subsections ofchapter 173-400 WAC by reference.

Citation

I Title

I State Explanation Effective

Date 

# lwAC 

## 173-400 General Regulations for Air Pollution Sources I 1400-030 IIDefinitions II 9/20/93 I

1 400-040 IGeneral Standards for Maximum Emissions

# L:J except (1)(c), and (1)(d), (2), (4), and the 2nd paragraph of (6) 1400-050 

## IEmission Standards for Combustion and 

## I 3/22/91 exceptthe exception Incineration Units provision in (3) 1400-060 

## IEm_ission Standards for General Process 

## I 3/22/91 

## I Umts 1400-081 llstartup and Shutdown II 9/20/93 

# LJVoluntary Limits on Emissions 

# L:J including all regulatory orders issued pursuant to this section 1400-105 IIRecords, Monitoring and Reporting 9/20/93 I 1400-107 IIExcess Emissions 9/20/93 

# I 1400-110 IINew Source Review (NSR) 9/20/93 1400-112 

## IRequirements for New Sources in 9/20/93 except (8) 

## I Nonattainment Areas 1400-113 

## IRequirements for New Sources in 9/20/93 

## I except (5) 

## I

.Attainment orUnclassifiable Areas 1400-151 

## IRetrofi: Requirements for Visibility 3/22/91 Protection 1400-161 llcompliance Schedules 

# I 3/22/91 1400-171 IIPublic Involvement II 9/20/93 1400-190 IIRequirements for NonattainmentAreas II 3/22/91 1400-200 

## ICreditable Stack Height & Dispersion 

## I 3/22/91 

## I Techniques 1400-205 !!Adjustmentfor Atmospheric Conditions II 3/22/91 State adopted: 0/21/95; EPA effective: 7122196
#### STATE ex rel. Michael ARCENEAUX v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 97-KH-3126.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1998.

In re Arceneaux, Michael; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 330-437; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 97KW-2099.

Denied.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.
**
EXHIBIT 23.1 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Plan Administrator 

Total System Services, Inc. 

    2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan: 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-181790) on Form S-8 of Total System Services, Inc. of our report dated April 11,2019, with respect to the statements of financial condition of the Total System Services, Inc. 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the Plan) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related statements of operations and changes in plan equity foreach of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes, which report appears in the December 31, 2018 annual report on Form 11-K of the Total System Services, Inc.2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, included as Exhibit 99.1 to the December 31, 2018 annual report Form 10-K/A Amendment No.1 of Total System Services, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

April 11, 2019 
**
CONSENT OF H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.



The Board of Directors
XCL, Ltd.
110 Rue Jean Lafitte
Lafayette LA 70508

Gentlemen:

We hereby consent to  the use of the name H.J. Gruy and
Associats, Inc. and references to H.J. Gruy and Associates,
Inc. and to the references to our report dated October 12,
1998 (Proved Reserves, Zhao Dong Block, China) prepared for
XCL Ltd. in the filing of Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report
on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 of 
XCL Ltd.


                         Yours very truly,

                         H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

                         /s/ James H. Hartsock

                         By:James H.Hartsock, PhD,PE
                         Title:Executive Vice President

Houston, Texas
October 12, 1998

H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 1200 Smith Street, Suite 3040, Houston, 
Texas  77002 o (713)739-1000
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have issued our reports dated
September 9, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule ( which includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes  An interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 on July 1, 2007) and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Nobel Learning Communities, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year (52-week period) ended June 28, 2008. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Nobel Learning Communities, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-148294, effective
January 8, 2008) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-140507, effective February 7, 2007; File No. 333-124247, effective April 22, 2005; File No. 333-61372, effective May 22, 2001; File No. 333-61374, effective
May 22, 2001; File No. 033-64701, effective December 1, 1995).



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/    Grant Thornton LLP 
|                          
|Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
|September 9, 2008
Before the First Division,

February 29, 1940

No. 43294.

#### Protests 984323-G, etc., of Consumers Import Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 42416 the fish liver oils in question were held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 34 as claimed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

   We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 and S-3 of our report dated November 19, 1999 (except
for Note 4, as to which the date is January 13, 2000) with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Xceed, Inc. and Subsidiaries included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-KA for the year ended August 31, 1999.

                                             /s/ Holtz Rubenstein & Co., LLP
                                             -------------------------------
                                                 Holtz Rubenstein & Co., LLP

Melville, New York
April 8, 2000
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20622]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Interest Rates

    The Small Business Administration publishes an interest rate called 
the optional ``peg'' rate (13 CFR 120.214) on a quarterly basis. This 
rate is a weighted average cost of money to the government for 
maturities similar to the average SBA direct loan. This rate may be 
used as a base rate for guaranteed fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. 
This rate will be 6\7/8\ percent for the July-September quarter of FY 
97.
    Pursuant to 13 CFR 120.932, the maximum legal interest rate for a 
commercial loan which funds any portion of the cost of a project (see 
13 CFR 120.801) shall be the greater of 6% over the New York prime rate 
of the limitation established by the constitution or laws of a given 
State. The initial rate for a fixed rate loan shall be the legal rate 
for the term of the loan.
Jane Palsgrove Butler,
Acting Associate Administrator for Financial Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-20622 Filed 8-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P-M
#### National Silver Co. *v.*United States

No. 6910.

Entry No. 760060.

Invoice dated Sheffield, England, March 12, 1946.

Certified March 13, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 13, 1946.

(Decided February 20, 1947)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the above-mentioned merchandise are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C. A. D. 334, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts I find the export value, as defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the values of said merchandise, and that such values are the appraised values, less additions made by importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications NOAA F/NWC-198 Determining Minimum Viable Populations under the Endangered Species Act 
Figure A4. Relationship between expected utility and nominal utility as a function of the probability of persistence p and the p exponent in the utility function (b2). 

Use your browser's BACK button to return to the text.

Table of Contents
No. 99-7849.

#### Williams *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
****
 **EXHIBIT
32.1**
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pingchuan Pharmaceutical, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Yao, Qitai, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
based on my knowledge:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 PINGCHUAN
PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
 
 
 /S/
YAO, QITAI
 Date: May
23, 2005
 YAO,
QITAI
 CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
***Exhibit
        23b***




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM AND REPORT ON
      SCHEDULES**




We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
      Statement No. 333-33903 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 25, 2004,
      appearing in this Annual Report of Form 10-K of Investors Title Company (the
      “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2005.




Our audit of the consolidated financial statements referred
      to
      in our aforementioned report also included the financial statement schedules
      of
      the Company, listed in Item 15. These financial statement schedules are the
      responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
      opinion based on our audit. In our opinion, such financial statement schedules,
      when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
      present fairly in all material respects, the information set forth
      therein.






/s/ Deloitte
              & Touche LLPDeloitte
&
Touche
              LLPRaleigh,
                  North Carolina
              March
                16, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           19,752,550
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           4,730,481
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             4,942,500
<EQUITIES>                                      6,530,394
<MORTGAGE>                                              0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                           0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 31,124,410
<CASH>                                          2,823,177
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                      0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 41,293,007
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 7,622,140
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                     0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                     96,241
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                   0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          879,612
<OTHER-SE>                                     30,249,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   41,293,007
<PREMIUMS>                                     29,875,350
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             1,628,188
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                269,396
<OTHER-INCOME>                                    617,582
<BENEFITS>                                      4,679,353
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                             0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           21,260,381
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 6,450,782
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,920,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             4,530,382
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    4,530,382
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        1.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        1.60
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                          0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                     0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                       0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                      0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                        0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                         0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                                 0
        

</TABLE>
No. 99-596.

#### George Mason University *v.*Litman et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Motions of Pacific Legal Foundation and Center for Original Intent of the Constitution for leave to file briefs as *amici curiae*granted. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-817.

#### Paul v. Fredley et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
June 11, 2015 

 

Mr. Lorenzo Lopez 

2238 W. 18th Place 

Chicago, ID 60608 

Dear Mr. Lopez: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your May 22, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

1875), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
(Reap. Dec. 9117)

#### H. W. Butterworth & Sons Co. et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 804594, etc.

(Decided April 2, 1958)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Dolib,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule of appeals, attached to and made part of this decision, present the question of the proper dutiable value of certain machines and parts thereof.

It has been stipulated and agreed by the parties hereto that the market value or price at the time of exportation to the United States of the involved machines and parts at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all *780purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, namely Switzerland, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, is as set forth in schedule “A,” attached hereto añd made a part hereof. It was further stipulated and agreed that there was no higher export value for such or similar merchandise at the time of exportation thereof.

Upon the agreed facts of record, I find and hold that foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)), is the proper basis of value for the machines and parts before the court and that said value is as shown on the attached schedule “A.”

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 147 (Thursday, July 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20232]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1179-DR]


Texas; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Texas, (FEMA-1179-DR), dated July 7, 1997, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 18, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Texas, is hereby amended to include the following areas among those 
areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe 
declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of July 
7, 1997:

    Blanco and Hays Counties for Individual Assistance.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
Catherine H. Light,
Deputy Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-20232 Filed 7-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2349 

To suspend temporarily the duty on cyanamide. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on cyanamide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CYANAMIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Cyanamide (CAS No. 420– 

04–2) (provided for in subheading 2835.00.00) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2349 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2014184EN.01002302.xml

| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/23

---

Order of the President of the Court of 13 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Central Administrativo Norte — Portugal) — Marina da Conceição Pacheco Almeida v Fundo de Garantia Salarial, IP, Instituto da Segurança Social, IP

(Case C-57/13) (1)

1

2014/C 184/34

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 108, 13. 4. 2013.

1

---
#### In the Matter of Marvin K. HORINE.

No. 85S00-9712-DI-651.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

Sept. 9, 1998.

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Comes now the respondent, Marvin K. Ho-rine, and tenders to this Court his affidavit of resignation from the bar of this state, pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 17.

And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the respondent’s affidavit complies with the requirements of Admis.Dise.R. 23(17). Accordingly, we find that it should be approved.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the affidavit of resignation from the bar of this state tendered by the respondent, Marvin K. Horine, is hereby accepted. Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to strike his name from the Roll of Attorneys.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, in light of the respondent’s resignation from the bar of this state, this disciplinary action is dismissed as moot.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward notice of this Order to the respondent and his attorney, to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, and to all other entities pursuant to Ad-mis.Dise.R. 23(3)(d).

All Justices concur.
Page 2 of 2

October 24, 2011 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M
- 30 West Building ground floor Room W12
- 140 1200 new Jersey

Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 **Subject:** Extension of Exemption from 14 CFR Part 65.75(a) to allow the Aviation Mechanic General (AMG) written tests to be administered after completing the corresponding portion of the curriculum. **Exemption Number** : 10016 **Docket Number:** FAA
- 2010
- 0097 Dear Sir or Madam, National Aviation Academy operates an FAA Approved Aviation Maintenance Technician School (AMTS), in Clearwater, Florida under Air Agency Certificate number DV9T100R. **Petition:** National Aviation Academy is requesting an extension of E xemption Number 10016 relating to 1 4 CFR Part 65.75(a) to allow the Aviation Mechanic written tests (AMG, AMA, AMP) to be administered after completing the corresponding portion of the approved curriculum. **Relief Sought:** National Aviation Academy is seeking an extension from 14 CFR Part 65.75(a) to allow students enrolled i n its FAA Approved 14 CFR Part 147 Aviation Maintenance Technician School (AMTS) to take the Aviation Mechanic written tests (AMG, AMA, AMP) after completing the corresponding portion of the curriculum, prior to meeting the experience requirements of §65.7 7. www.naa.edu



## National Aviation Academy Florida 6225 Ulmerton Road Clearwater, Florida 33760 Phone: 800.659.2080 Fax: 727.535.8727 New England 150 Hanscom Drive Bedford , Massachusetts 01730 Phone: 800.292.3228 Fax: 781.274.8490Page 2 of 2

**Persons to be covered by the exemption:** National Aviation Academy , Air Agency Certificate Number DV9T100R and students enrolled in its AMTS program in the Airframe, Powerplant or Airframe and Powerplant curricula. **Information, views or argument s to support the action sought:**  There has been no c hange in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. The requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent and a ny delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to National Aviation Academ y and the students served b y it. Sincerel y, Original signed by Douglas W. Ecks Douglas W. Ecks Director of Education National Aviation Academy
CC: Frank D. Schaefer Flight Standards District Office SO
- FSDO
- 35 5601 Mariner Street, Suite 310 Tampa, FL 33609
- 3413