alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
take

take

in

Your 2010 Census form will arrive in March.

Every year, the federal government distributes $400 billion to tribal, state and local governments 

based on census data. Please take 10 minutes to complete and mail back your census form. Make a 

difference in your community. 

The 2010 Census: A Snapshot

\ The census is a count of everyone in the United States; citizens and noncitizens. 

\ The individual in whose name the housing unit is rented or owned should complete the 

form on behalf of every person living in the in the residence; relatives and nonrelatives. 

\ Complete and mail back the census form as soon as it arrives. Census workers will visit 

households that do not return the form to take the count in person.

The 2010 Census is easy, important and safe. By law, your personal information cannot be shared 

with anyone.

For more information, visit 2010census.gov.

in

Your 2010 Census form will arrive in March.

Every year, the federal government distributes $400 billion to tribal, state and local governments 

based on census data. Please take 10 minutes to complete and mail back your census form. Make a 

difference in your community. 

The 2010 Census: A Snapshot

\ The census is a count of everyone in the United States; citizens and noncitizens. 

\ The individual in whose name the housing unit is rented or owned should complete the 

form on behalf of every person living in the in the residence; relatives and nonrelatives. 

\ Complete and mail back the census form as soon as it arrives. Census workers will visit 

households that do not return the form to take the count in person.

The 2010 Census is easy, important and safe. By law, your personal information cannot be shared 

with anyone.

For more information, visit 2010census.gov.
#### Junior EASTERLING v. STATE.

3 Div. 781.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Nov. 15, 1977.

B. F. Lovelace, Public Defender, Brew-ton, for appellant.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen. and Elizabeth N. Petree, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

DeCARLO, Judge.

Unlawful possession of controlled substance Pentazacine (Talwin); three years.

On April 22, 1977, Junior Easterling appeared with appointed counsel in the circuit court of Escambia County and pleaded guilty to the charge of unlawful possession of controlled substance.

A colloquy between the judge and the appellant occurred and during this exchange, all the appellant’s rights as per *Boykin*v. *Alabama,*395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274, were explained to him with the exception of his right to confront his accusers.

In view of the trial court’s failure to admonish the appellant on this right, we are compelled to reverse this case on authority of *Boykin,*supra.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All the Judges concur.
NEUMEYER, and REBECCA WEED, individual

electors,

Plaintiffs and Appellees,

v. ORDER

STATE OF MONTANA, by and through its

SECRETARY OF STATE, COREY

STAPLETON,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant and Appellant Secretary of State moves to consolidate these two appeals

and to order an expedited briefing schedule in order to have the appeals decided prior to the

August 20, 2020 deadline for the Secretary of State to certify for the November 2020 general

election ballot the names and designations of statewide candidates to election administrators.

Section 13-12-201(1), MCA. Both appeals are taken frorn an August 7, 2020 order of the

First Judicial District Court directing the Secretary of State to strike from the general election

ballot the narnes of Montana Green Party candidates who advanced after the June 2, 2020

primary election. Also at issue are the unsuccessful intervention motions of the Montana

Republican Party, Lorrie Campbell, and Jill Loven. Plaintiff and Appellee the Montana

Dernocratic Party opposes consolidation of the two appeals but agrees with the Secretary of

State's proposed expedited briefing schedule in DA 20-0396 and indicates that it will comply

with any briefing schedule set by the Court.

Having considered the parties' submissions, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Consolidate Appeals is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request for an expedited briefing schedule is
pp

p

y 

y 

g

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that proposed intervenors the Montana Republican

Party, Lorrie Campbell, and Jill Loven are GRANTED leave to file amicus briefs in

accordance with M. R. App. P. 11(4)(a) and 12(7). Any amicus briefs must be filed by

August 12, 2020.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Lewis and Clark County Clerk of District Court

is directed to transrnit the record immediately upon receipt of this Order.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to file this Order in each of the above-referenced

cases and to provide immediate notice of its entry to all counsel of record and to the Lewis

and Clark County Clerk of District Court.

DATED this t( ay of August, 2020.

Chief Justice

2
# C_2013171EN.01001901.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 2 April 2013 — Turbo.com BV, other party: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-163/13)

2013/C 171/37

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Turbo.com BV

Applicant:

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Should the national authorities and judicial bodies, on the basis of the law of the European Union, refuse to apply the VAT exemption in respect of an intra-Community supply where it is established, on the basis of objective evidence, that there was VAT fraud in respect of the goods concerned and that the taxable person knew or should have known that he was participating therein, even if the national law does not make provision under those circumstances for refusing the exemption?

---
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Spectrum Realty, Inc.(the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony
Eppolito, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for
purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated
      and results of operations of the Company for the period
      indicated.





Dated:  August
13, 2010





/s/
      G. Anthony EppolitoG.
      Anthony EppolitoVice
      President and Chief Financial
Officer
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 23.03

CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Rational Software Corporation

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated January 26, 1996 relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of SQA, Inc. as of December 31, 1994 and 1995 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995,
included in this annual report on Form 10-K, into Rational Software's previously
filed Registration Statement No.'s 33-77382, 33-85906, 333-15007, 333-15015,
333-21563, 333-22687, 333-25815, 333-31505, 333-32991, 333-39455, 333-39569,
333-45393 and 333-52017 on form S-8.

/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
May 26, 1998
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1219 

To authorize certain tribes in the State of Montana to enter into a lease 

or other temporary conveyance of water rights to meet the water needs 

of the Dry Prairie Rural Water Association, Inc. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 9, 2005 

Mr. BURNS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2005 

Committee discharged; referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize certain tribes in the State of Montana to enter 

into a lease or other temporary conveyance of water 

rights to meet the water needs of the Dry Prairie Rural 

Water Association, Inc. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE OF WATER RIGHTS 

4 TO DRY PRAIRIE RURAL WATER ASSOCIA5 TION, INC. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes 

7 of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana (referred 
2 

S 1219 RCS

1 to in this section as the ‘‘Tribes’’) may, with the approval 

2 of the Secretary, enter into a lease or other temporary con3 veyance of water rights recognized under the Fort Peck4 Montana Compact (Montana Code Annotated 85–20–201) 

5 with the Dry Prairie Rural Water Association, Incor6 porated (or any successor non-Federal entity) for the pur7 pose of meeting the water needs of that association, in 

8 accordance with section 5 of the Fort Peck Reservation 

9 Rural Water System Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–382; 

10 114 Stat. 1454). 

11 (b) CONDITIONS OF LEASE.—With respect to a lease 

12 or other temporary conveyance described in subsection 

13 (a)— 

14 (1) the term of the lease or conveyance shall 

15 not exceed 100 years; and 

16 (2)(A) the lease or conveyance may be approved 

17 by the Secretary without monetary compensation to 

18 the Tribes; and 

19 (B) the Secretary shall not be subject to liabil20 ity for any claim relating to any compensation or 

21 consideration received by the Tribes under the lease 

22 or conveyance. 
3 

S 1219 RCS

1 (c) NO PERMANENT ALIENATION OF WATER.—Noth2 ing in this section authorizes a permanent alienation of 

3 any water by the Tribes. 

Æ
No. 00-738.

#### Nace *v.*Achievement & Guidance Centers of America, Inc./Medco Behavioral Care Systems.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. D-2073.

#### In re Disbarment of Nunes,

*ante,*p. 801. Petition for reconsideration denied.
#### Jerry A. MARGOLIN, M.D., Appellant, v. MORTON F. PLANT HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 77-457.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 8, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 11, 1977.

F. Wallace Pope, Jr., of Johnson, Blakely, Pope & Bokor, Clearwater, for appellant.

James A. Martin, Jr., and Emil C. Mar-quardt, Jr., of McMullen, Everett, Logan, Marquardt & Cline, Clearwater, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss with prejudice Count IV of the amended complaint. The trial court found that this count did not state a cause of action.

In Count IV the appellant/doctor asserts that he was denied fundamental due process rights by appellee/Morton Plant Hospital Association, Inc. in removing him from the hospital staff. Even though the hospital in question is a private hospital1 this count states a cause of action for injunctive relief because it includes allegations that in the course of revoking the appellant’s staff privileges the hospital substantially departed from the provisions of its own bylaws. *McElhinney v. William Booth Memorial Hospital,*544 S.W.2d 216 (Ky.1977); *Berberian v. Lancaster Osteopathic Hospital Asso.,*395 Pa. 257, 149 A.2d 456 (1959); *Joseph v. Passaic Hospital Asso., 26*N.J. 557, 141 A.2d 18 (1958).

REVERSED and REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and HOBSON and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

1

. *West Coast Hospital Association v. Hoare,*64 So.2d 293 (Fla.1953); *Moles v. White,*336 So.2d 427 (Fla.2d DCA 1976).
----

----

|   | 1.  The      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.  The      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the LP. |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 15,      2008                                                                                 |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                         |   |   |
| /s/      Anthony J. Branca                                                                                   |   |   |
| Anthony      J. Branca                                                                                       |   |   |
| Chief      Financial OfficerICON      Capital Corp.General      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight BL.P. |
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of PMC Capital, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lance
B. Rosemore, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Lance B. Rosemore
---------------------
Lance B. Rosemore
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2003


         This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

         A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 21, 2023

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00601-CV

K.S.M., Appellant

V.

S.H., Appellee

On Appeal from the 312th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2015-59700

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from a final order in a suit affect the parent-child

relationship, See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 109.002 judgment signed May 17, 2022. 

Appellant K.S.M. filed a timely request for findings of fact and conclusions of law

on May 24, 2022. Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed August 16, 2022.

When an appellant has filed a timely post-judgment motion, the notice of 

appeal must be filed within 90 days after the date the judgment is signed. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 26.1(a)(4). Appellant’s notice of appeal was due August 15, 2022. 
2

Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed timely. A motion to extend time is 

necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal 

beyond the time allowed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, but within 

the 15-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion to extend time. 

See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617–18 (1997) (construing the 

predecessor to Rule 26). Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed within the 15-day 

period provided by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3.

Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. 

While an extension may be implied, appellant is still obligated to come forward 

with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark 

Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd., 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th 

Dist.] 1998, no pet.). On February 7, 2023, appellant was ordered to file a proper 

motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal within ten (10) days of the date of

this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3; 10.5(b). Appellant was notified the appeal was

subject to dismissal without further notice for want of jurisdiction if no proper 

motion to extend time was filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

Appellant filed no response. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Jewell and Spain.
TEXT ONLY

c
| Last updated: 05/07/2004        doj/jmd/ls/jj | UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
**CHAIRMAN        Edward F. Reilly, Jr.** |
|-----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. 99-7924.

#### Camarena-Perales *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41387]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20270]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than August 15, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Marshall T. Reynolds, Huntington, West Virginia; to retain a 
total of 11.1 percent of the voting shares of St. Mary Holding 
Corporation, Franklin, Louisiana, and thereby indirectly retain Saint 
Mary Bank and Trust Company, Franklin, Louisiana.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 28, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-20270 Filed 7-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Halifax Corporation of Virginia;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:      June 30, 2009
    /s/ Joseph SciaccaJoseph SciaccaChief Financial Officer
Before the Third Division,

April 20, 1942

No. 47102.

#### Protest 65797-K of Allen Forwarding Co. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the merchandise in question consists of sillimanite similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 46420. In accordance therewith the claim for free entry under paragraph 1719 was sustained.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Robert O’BRIEN a/k/a Robert O’Brian.

No. 60292.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 19, 1977.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ denied. No abuse of discretion.

SUMMERS, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted. I have heretofore taken the position that a reduction of bond in the companion cases was unwarranted in this $10,000,000 illegal drug arrest. Nothing has since been shown to warrant a change of this position.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20649]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Customs Service
[T.D. 97-70]


Revocation of Customs Broker License

AGENCY: U.S. Customs Service, Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Broker License Revocation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AMENDED: Notice is hereby given that the Commissioner of Customs, 
pursuant to Section 641, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 
1641), and Sections 111.52 and 111.74 of the Customs Regulations, as 
amended (19 CFR 111.52 and 111.74), the following Customs broker 
license is canceled with prejudice.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                License 
               Port                         Individual            No.   
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Houston...........................  Sam Martinez.............       6282
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: August 1, 1997.
Philip Metzger,
Director, Trade Compliance.
[FR Doc. 97-20649 Filed 8-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P