41270 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 1997 / Rules and Regulations

SIAPs. This amendment also identifies

the airport, its location, the procedure

identification and the amendment

number.

The Rule

This amendment to part 97 is effective

upon publication of each separate SIAP

as contained in the transmittal. Some

SIAP amendments may have been

previously issued by the FAA in a

National Flight Data Center (FDC)

Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) as an

emergency action of immediate flight

safety relating directly to published

aeronautcial charts. The circumstances

which created the need for some SIAP

amendments may require making them

effective in less than 30 days. For the

remaining SIAPs, an effective date at

least 30 days after publication is

provided.

Further, the SIAPs contained in this

amendment are based on the criteria

contained in the U.S. Standard for

Terminal Instrument Approach

Procedures (TERPS). In developing

these SIAPs, the TERPS criteria were

applied to the conditions existing or

anticipated at the affected airports.

Because of the close and immediate

relationship between these SIAPs and

safety in air commerce, I find that notice

and public procedure before adopting

these SIAPs are impracticable and

contrary to the public interest and,

where applicable, that good cause exists

for making some SIAPs effective in less

than 30 days.

The FAA has determined that this

regulation only involves an established

body of technical regulations for which

frequent and routine amendments are

necessary to keep them operationally

current. It, therefore—(1) is not a

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated

impact is so minimal. For the same

reason, the FAA certifies that this

amendment will not have a significant

economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities under the

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

Air traffic control, Airports,

Navigation (air).

Issued in Washington, DC on July 25, 1997.

Thomas E. Stuckey,

Acting Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of The Amendment

Accordingly, pursuant to the

authority delegated to me, part 97 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

part 97) is amended by establishing,

amending, suspending, or revoking

Standard Instrument Approach

Procedures, effective at 0901 UTC on

the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97—STANDARD INSTRUMENT

APPROACH PROCEDURES

1. The authority citation for part 97 is

revised to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,

40120, 44701; and 14 CFR 11.49(b)(2).

2. Part 97 is amended to read as

follows:

By amending: § 97.23 VOR, VOR/

DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME

or TACAN; § 97.25 LOC, LOC/DME,

LDA, LDA/DME, SDF, SDF/DME;

§ 97.27 NDB, NDB/DME; § 97.29 ILS,

ILS/DME,ISMLS, MLS, MLS/DME,

MLS/RNAV; § 97.31 RADAR SIAPs;

§ 97.33 RNAV SIAPs; and § 97.35

COPTER SIAPs, identified as follows:

* * * Effective August 14, 1997

Birmingham, AL, Birmingham Intl, LOC

RWY 23, AMDT 5, Cancelled

Birmingham, AL, Birmingham Intl, LOC

RWY 18, Orig

Birmingham, AL, Birmingham Intl, ILS RWY

23, Orig

* * * Effective September 11, 1997

Wrangell, AK, Wrangell, GPS–A, Orig

Murrieta/Temecula, CA, French Valley, GPS

RWY 18, Orig

Monte Vista, CO, Monte Vista Muni, GPS

RWY 20, Orig

Oxford, CT, Waterbury-Oxford, ILS RWY 36,

Amdt 11

Windsor Locks, CT, Bradley Intl, VOR OR

TACAN RWY 6, Orig

Windsor Locks, CT, Bradley Intl, VOR OR

TACAN RWY 15, Amdt 2

Windsor Locks, CT, Bradley Intl, VOR OR

TACAN RWY 24, Orig

Windsor Locks, CT, Bradley Intl, VOR OR

TACAN RWY 33, Orig

Windsor Locks, CT, Bradley Intl, NDB or GPS

RWY 6, Amdt 28

Windsor Locks, CT, Bradley Intl, COPTER

ILS 058, Amdt 2

Windsor Locks, CT, Bradley Intl, ILS RWY 6,

Amdt 34

Windsor Locks, CT, Bradley Intl, ILS RWY

24, Amdt 8

Windsor Locks, CT, Bradley Intl, ILS RWY

33, Amdt 7

Windsor Locks, CT, Bradley Intl, GPS RWY

15, Amdt 3

Marco Island, FL, Marco Island, LOC RWY

17, Orig

Brunswick, GA, Glynco Jetport, VOR/DME

OR GPS–B, Amdt 7

Brunswick, GA, Glynco Jetport, NDB OR GPS

RWY 7, Amdt 10

Brunswick, GA, Glynco Jetport, ILS RWY 7,

Amdt 8

Bangor, ME, Bangor Intl, ILS RWY 15, Amdt

5

Baltimore, MD, Baltimore-Washington Intl,

ILS RWY 10, Amdt 16

Jefferson City, MO, Jefferson City Meml, NDB

RWY 12, Amdt 2

Jefferson City, MO, Jefferson City Meml, NDB

RWY 30, Orig

Jefferson City, MO, Jefferson City Meml, ILS

RWY 30, Amdt 4

Grants NM, Grants-Milan Muni, GPS RWY

31, Orig

Olean, NY, Chattaraugus County-Olean, NDB

RWY 22, Amdt 12

Grand Forks, ND, Grand Forks Intl, VOR OR

GPS RWY 17R, Amdt 5

Grand Forks, ND, Grand Forks Intl, VOR OR

GPS RWY 35L, Amdt 6

Grand Forks, ND, Grand Forks Intl, LOC BC

RWY 17R, Amdt 11

Grand Forks, ND, Grand Forks Intl, ILS RWY

35L, Amdt 10

Philipsburg, PA, Mid-State, VOR RWY 24,

Amdt 15

Philipsburg, PA, Mid-State, ILS RWY 16,

Amdt 6

Canadian, TX, Hemphill County, GPS RWY

4, Orig

Canadian, TX, Hemphill County, GPS RWY

22, Orig

Pennington Gap, VA, Lee County, NDB or

GPS–A, Amdt 2, Cancelled

* * * Effective November 6, 1997

Silver Bay, MN, Silver Bay Muni, GPS RWY

25, Orig

Note: The FAA published the following

procedure in Docket No. 28942, Amdt No.

1803 to Part 97 of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (Vol 62, No. 121, page 33993,

dated Tuesday, June 24, 1997) under Section

97.33 effective September 11, 1997, which is

hereby rescinded:

San Martin, CA, South County Arpt of Santa

Clara County, GPS RWY 32, Orig

[FR Doc. 97–20291 Filed 7–31–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

20 CFR Part 340

RIN 3220–AB32

Recovery of Benefits

AGENCY: Railroad Retirement Board.

ACTION: Interim final rule.

SUMMARY: The Railroad Retirement

Board (Board) hereby amends part 340

of its regulations to reflect its authority

to compromise debts provided that the

amount recoverable does not exceed

$100,000 exclusive of interest. This

amendment would conform the Board’s

regulations to present law.

DATES: Effective Date: This regulation

will be effective August 1, 1997.

Comment Date: Comments due on or

before September 30, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to

the Secretary to the Board, Railroad

Retirement Board, 844 North Rush

Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611.
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 1997 / Rules and Regulations 41271

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Thomas W. Sadler, Senior Attorney,

Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North

Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611,

(312) 751–4513, TDD (312) 751–4701.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section

8(b) of Pub. L. 101–552, enacted

November 15, 1990, amended section

3711 of title 31 of the United States

Code to increase from $20,000 to

$100,000 (or a higher amount if so

prescribed by the Attorney General) the

amount of a claim that an agency is

authorized to compromise. Consistent

with the change in the law, the Board

is amending § 340.13 of its regulations

under the Railroad Unemployment

Insurance Act to reflect this change in

law.

Because all Federal agencies must

comply with Federal claims collection

provisions the Board is publishing this

rule as an interim final rule, rather than

a proposed rule. However, any person

wishing to comment on this rule may do

so within 60 days of the date of this

publication in the Federal Register.

The Board, with the concurrence of

the Office of Management and Budget,

has determined that this is not a major

rule for the purposes of Executive Order

12866. Therefore, no regulatory analysis

is required. This rule does not involve

any information collection

requirements.

List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 340

Railroad employees, Railroad

unemployment benefits.

For the reasons set out in the

preamble, title 20, chapter II, part 340 of

the Code of Federal Regulations is

amended as follows:

PART 340—RECOVERY OF BENEFITS

1. The authority for part 340

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 45 U.S.C. 362(l).

§ 340.13 Compromise of amounts

recoverable.

2. Section 340.13, Compromise of

amounts recoverable, is amended by

removing ‘‘$20,000.’’ at the end of the

first sentence and adding in lieu thereof

‘‘$100,000, excluding interest, or such

higher amount as the Attorney General

may from time to time prescribe.’’

* * *

Dated: July 25, 1997.

By Authority of the Board, for the Board.

Beatrice Ezerski,

Secretary to the Board.

[FR Doc. 97–20359 Filed 7–31–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7905–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 178

[Docket No. 95F–0170]

Indirect Food Additives: Adjuvants,

Production Aids, and Sanitizers

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration,

HHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug

Administration (FDA) is amending the

food additive regulations to provide for

the safe use of 2,4-dimethyl-6-(1-

methylpentadecyl)phenol as an

antioxidant and/or stabilizer in

acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene

copolymers and in rigid polyvinyl

chloride intended for food-contact

applications. This action is in response

to a petition filed by Ciba-Geigy Corp.

DATES: Effective August 1, 1997. Written

objections and requests for a hearing by

September 2, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Submit written objections to

the Dockets Management Branch (HFA–

305), Food and Drug Administration,

12420 Parklawn Dr., rm. 1–23,

Rockville, MD 20857.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mark A. Hepp, Center for Food Safety

and Applied Nutrition (HFS–215), Food

and Drug Administration, 200 C St. SW.,

Washington, DC 20204, 202–418–3098.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a notice

published in the Federal Register of

July 12, 1995 (60 FR 35913), FDA

announced that a food additive petition

(FAP 5B4468) had been filed by CibaGeigy Corp., Seven Skyline Dr.,

Hawthorne, NY 10532–2188. The

petition proposed to amend the food

additive regulations in § 178.2010

Antioxidants and/or stabilizers for

polymers (21 CFR 178.2010) to provide

for the safe use of 2,4-dimethyl-6-(1-

methylpentadecyl)phenol as an

antioxidant and/or stabilizer in

acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene

copolymers and in rigid polyvinyl

chloride intended for food-contact

applications.

FDA has evaluated data in the

petition and other relevant material.

Based on this information, the agency

concludes that the proposed use of the

additive as an antioxidant and/or

stabilizer in acrylonitrile-butadienestyrene copolymers and in rigid

polyvinyl chloride intended for foodcontact applications is safe and that the

additive will have the intended

technical effect. Therefore, the

regulations in § 178.2010 should be

amended as set forth below.

In accordance with § 171.1(h) (21 CFR

171.1(h)), the petition and the

documents that FDA considered and

relied upon in reaching its decision to

approve the petition are available for

inspection at the Center for Food Safety

and Applied Nutrition by appointment

with the information contact person

listed above. As provided in § 171.1(h),

the agency will delete from the

documents any materials that are not

available for public disclosure before

making the documents available for

inspection.

The agency has carefully considered

the potential environmental effects of

this action. FDA has concluded that the

action will not have a significant impact

on the human environment, and that an

environmental impact statement is not

required. The agency’s finding of no

significant impact and the evidence

supporting that finding, contained in an

environmental assessment, may be seen

in the Dockets Management Branch

(address above) between 9 a.m. and 4

p.m., Monday through Friday. No

comments were received during the 30-

day comment period specified in the

filing notice for comments on the

environmental assessment submitted

with the petition.

Any person who will be adversely

affected by this regulation may at any

time on or before September 2, 1997, file

with the Dockets Management Branch

(address above) written objections

thereto. Each objection shall be

separately numbered, and each

numbered objection shall specify with

particularity the provisions of the

regulation to which objection is made

and the grounds for the objection. Each

numbered objection on which a hearing

is requested shall specifically so state.

Failure to request a hearing for any

particular objection shall constitute a

waiver of the right to a hearing on that

objection. Each numbered objection for

which a hearing is requested shall

include a detailed description and

analysis of the specific factual

information intended to be presented in

support of the objection in the event

that a hearing is held. Failure to include

such a description and analysis for any

particular objection shall constitute a

waiver of the right to a hearing on the

objection. Three copies of all documents

shall be submitted and shall be

identified with the docket number

found in brackets in the heading of this

document. Any objections received in

response to the regulation may be seen

in the Dockets Management Branch

between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday

through Friday.