alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 42133.

#### Protests 596374-G, etc., of Scaramelli & Co., Inc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 40880 the protests were sustained.
Served: March 1, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CENTRAL VIRGINIA AVIATION 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0044 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2012EA210031) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment- Service List 

R/ nnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl0001 

David H. Gates, Respondent's Counsel 

Cowan Gates 

1930 Huguenot Rd. 

P.O. Box 35655 

Richmond, VA 23235 

TEL: 804-320-9100 

FAJ<: 804-320-2900 

ONE COPY· 

Zachary M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Eastem Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAJ<: 718-995-5699 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

U.S. Administratiye Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

F AU<: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0044 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 150 (Tuesday, August 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20572]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1180-DR]


Wisconsin; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Wisconsin (FEMA-1180-DR), dated July 7, 1997, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 28, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Wisconsin is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of July 7, 1997:

    Washington County for Public Assistance (already designated for 
Individual Assistance).

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-20572 Filed 8-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 153 (Friday, August 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20962]



[[Page 42852]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Notice of Application for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart Q During 
the Week Ending August 1, 1997

    The following Applications for Certifications of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
Q of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 
CFR 302.1701 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming 
Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each 
application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: OST-97-2768.
    Date Filed: July 29, 1997.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: August 26, 1997.
    Description: Application of Far Eastern Air Transport Corporation, 
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. Section 41302 and Subpart Q of the Regulations, 
applies for a Foreign Air Carrier Permit that would permit Far Eastern 
to engage in scheduled and charter foreign air transportation of 
persons, property and mail between any point or points in Taiwan, on 
the one hand, and Guam, on the other.
Paulette V. Twine,
Chief, Documentary Services.
[FR Doc. 97-20962 Filed 8-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
#### HOSPITAL SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ST. LANDRY PARISH, Louisiana v. Frank DEAN et al.

No. 59952.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 10, 1977.

In re *Florence Joseph Sliman et al.*applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, 345 So.2d 234, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Landry.

Writ denied. No error of Law.

SUMMERS, J.,

dissents from the refusal of this application, being of the opinion the rationale of the decision in *Gremillion v. Rapides Parish School Board,*134 So.2d 700 (La.App.1961) upon which the Court of Appeal decision is based does not comply with the letter or spirit of Article I, § 4 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 Certification
        Pursuant to
 18
        U.S.C.
        Section 1350,
 (as
        adopted pursuant to Section 906
 of
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 In
        connection with the quarterly report Royal Spring Water Inc. (the “Company”), on
        Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended November 30, 2005 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
        the undersigned of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
        1350,
        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
        to
        the best of their knowledge:
 
 1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
  A
        signed
        original of this written certification has been provided to the Company and
        will
        be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange
        Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 /s/
                  Alex HazanName:
                  Alex HazanTitle:
                  Chief Executive OfficerNovember
                  22, 2006/s/
                  Harel GoldsteinName:
                  Harel GoldsteinTitle:
                  Chief Financial OfficerNovember 22,
                  2006
 
 This
        Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This exhibit is not “filed” for purposes of Section
        18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as provided
        by applicable rules of the Securities Exchange Commission.
# C_2015371EN.01000401.xml

| 9.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — procedure brought by F.E. Familienprivatstiftung Eisenstadt

(Case C-589/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Free movement of capital - Article 56 EC - Interim taxation of capital gains and income from the disposal of holdings by a national foundation - Refusal of right to deduct from the taxable amount gifts to non-resident beneficiaries exempt from tax in the Member State of the foundation under a double taxation convention))

(2015/C 371/05)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: F.E. Familienprivatstiftung Eisenstadt

Applicant:

Intervener: Unabhängiger Finanzsenat, Außenstelle Wien

Intervener:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 56 EC must be interpreted as precluding tax legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings under which, as regards interim tax which is charged on capital gains and income from the disposal of holdings of a resident private foundation, that foundation has the right to deduct from its taxable amount only gifts made in the course of a given assessment period that have been the subject of a tax levied within that period on the beneficiaries of those gifts in the Member State in which the foundation is taxed, whereas such a deduction is excluded by that national tax legislation where the beneficiaries reside in another Member State and are exempt, on the basis of a double taxation convention, from a tax that is otherwise charged on gifts in the Member State in which the foundation is taxed.

---

(1)  OJ C 71, 8.3.2014.

1

---
#### William SYKES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1887.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 2, 1977.

Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Mary Jo M. Gallay, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from a conviction of aggravated battery after a jury trial, the appellant contests the sufficiency of the evidence. The evidence fails to establish that appellant used a deadly weapon or had knowingly or intentionally caused great bodily harm, permanent disability or permanent disfigurement in the mutual fracas between appellant and the victim. The evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction of aggravated battery. Section 784.-045, Florida Statutes (1975).

The only other offense upon which the jury was instructed was simple battery. The evidence of the fight unequivocally establishes that the victim was the physical aggressor. The jury could not reasonably find that appellant touched or struck the victim against the victim’s will or that appellant intentionally caused bodily harm to the victim. The evidence was insufficient to support a conviction of simple battery. Section 784.03, Florida Statutes (1975).

Since all the evidence viewed in a light most favorable to the State fails to support the offenses with which appellant was charged before the jury, appellant’s convic*88tion must be, and is hereby, reversed and the appellant discharged.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and McNULTY and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
YEAR ENDED  DECEMBER  31, 1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, FILED ON APRIL 1, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>    0000722051                      
<NAME>   NCT GROUP, INC.                     
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          529
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   944
<ALLOWANCES>                                    228
<INVENTORY>                                    3320
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4750
<PP&E>                                        11493
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7615
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                15465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5937
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                    9240
<COMMON>                                       1563
<OTHER-SE>                                     4662
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  15465
<SALES>                                        2097
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3324
<CGS>                                          2235
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              14997
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                232
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (14183)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (14183)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (14183)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.12)
        


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana Through DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS v. NATCHITOCHES COUNTRY CLUB.

No. 60528.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 27, 1977.

In re: Natchitoches Country Club applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Natchitoches. 348 So.2d 141.

Writ denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM LL&E ROYALTY TRUST
1998 ANNUAL REPORT AND FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH 1998 ANNUAL REPORT AND FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          19,963
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,963
<PP&E>                                      76,282,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (73,717,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,584,963
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,584,963
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,584,963
<SALES>                                      9,886,679
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,886,679
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               526,456
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,360,223
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,360,223
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,361,986
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .493
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .493
        

</TABLE>
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2402 

To suspend temporarily the duty on sports footwear for men (other than 

ski-boots, cross-country ski footwear, snowboard boots and golf shoes), 

with spikes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mrs. MURRAY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on sports footwear for 

men (other than ski-boots, cross-country ski footwear, 

snowboard boots and golf shoes), with spikes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SPORTS FOOTWEAR FOR MEN (OTHER THAN 

4 SKI-BOOTS, CROSS-COUNTRY SKI FOOTWEAR, 

5 SNOWBOARD BOOTS AND GOLF SHOES), WITH 

6 SPIKES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2402 IS

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Sports footwear for men 

(other than ski-boots, crosscountry ski footwear, 

snowboard boots and golf 

shoes), with spikes (provided 

for in subheading 

6402.19.15) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

5 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

6 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADPOTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lawrence Financial Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report), I,
Jack Blair, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1. The report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                             /s/ Jack L. Blair
                             -----------------------
                             Chief Executive Officer
                                  Jack L. Blair
                                 August 13, 2002
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of

Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Global-Tech Advanced Innovations Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to
such officers knowledge, that:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the
Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form
20-F.

Date: August 31, 2011



/s/ John C.K. ShamJohn C.K. ShamPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Form 20-F or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

                           INTRAOP MEDICAL CORPORATION
                      (FORMERLY DIGITALPREVIEWS.COM, INC.)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intraop Medical Corporation (formerly
Digitalpreviews.com, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Shamy, Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                                     /s/ David Shamy
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     David Shamy
                                                     Principal Executive Officer
                                                     Principal Financial Officer

                                                     Date: November 15, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Intraop Medical Corporation and will be retained by Intraop Medical
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

                                       19