alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| **EXHIBIT 23**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

The Board of DirectorsSunrise Medical Inc.

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statement No.333-44911 on Form S-4, registration statement No. 33-88216, No.333-50047, No. 33-82842, No.33-39887, No. 333-72015, No.333-84553 and No. 333-96169 on Form S-8, and registration statement No.333-89715 on Form S-3 of Sunrise Medical Inc. of our report dated August 25,2000, except for the last paragraph of Note 7 and Note 17 which is as of September 22, 2000, relating to theconsolidated balance sheets of Sunrise Medical Inc. and subsidiaries as of June30, 2000 and July 2, 1999, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in thethree-year period ended June 30, 2000, and the related schedule, which reportappears in the June 30, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Sunrise Medical Inc.

 

/s/ KPMG LLPSan Diego, CaliforniaSeptember 26, 2000

  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-60543

Summary Calendar

_____________________

WILLIE JAMES SEYMOUR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

_______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Southern District of Mississippi

(3:96-CV-288-WS)

_______________________________________________________

July 29, 1998

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons

given in the Memorandum Opinion and Order dated July 28, 1997.

AFFIRMED.
#### John Heathcoat & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7803.

Entry No. 16360.

(Decided March 6, 1950)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General *(Charles J. Miville,*special attorney), for the defendant.

FoRD, Judge:

This appeal for a reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the issues herein are the same in all material respects as those involved in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, and that the appraised value of the merchandise involved herein, less the additions made by the importer on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal, is equal to the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value for such or similar merchandise was no higher. The record in the *Pitcairn*case, *supra,*has been admitted in evidence as a part of the record herein.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, I find the proper dutiable export value of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the value found by the appraiser, less any amount added by the importer on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
***Exhibit
      23a***


***Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm***


***and
      Report on Schedules***











We
      consent to the use in Registration Statement No. 333-33903 of Investors Title
      Company (the “Company”) and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our report dated March
      16, 2006, incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
      Company for the year ended December 31, 2005.





Our
      audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our
      aforementioned report also included the financial statement schedules of the
      Company, listed in Item 15 as of December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and
      for
      the years then ended. These financial statement schedules are the
      responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
      opinion based on our audit. In our opinion, such financial statement schedules,
      when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements
      taken
      as a whole, present fairly in all material respects, the information set forth
      herein.








/s/ Dixon
              Hughes PLLCDixon
              Hughes PLLCHigh
                Point, North Carolina
              March
                16, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Bradley J. Dodson, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Oil States International, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





| |  |                            | 
| |  | -------------------------- | 
| |  | /s/ Bradley J. Dodson      | 
| |  | Name:   Bradley J. Dodson  | 
| |  | Date:     October 31, 2013 |
Exhibit 10.3


Agreement re Operating Subsidiary Dividend


The undersigned investor (“Investor”), being a party to the Share Purchase and Merger Agreement dated May 24, 2007 by and among Advance Technologies, Inc. (the “Corporation”), American SXAN Biotech, Inc. and others (the “Merger Agreement”), hereby states and agrees as follows:





	
             
 	
            1.
 	
            The undersigned is a party to the Merger Agreement in the capacity of “Investor.”
 





2.            Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Investor will purchase shares of common stock of the Corporation.


3.            The Merger Agreement further provides that the assets and business of the Corporation will be transferred to its wholly owned subsidiary, Infrared Systems International (the “Subsidiary”) on the date of the Closing (as defined in the Merger Agreement) and that, upon satisfaction of certain conditions, the stock of the Subsidiary will be spun off to the holders of common stock and Series A Preferred Stock of the Corporation as a stock dividend (the “Subsidiary Stock Dividend”).


4.            As a condition to the consummation of the transactions contemplated in the Merger Agreement, the Investors have agreed to surrender to the Subsidiary the Subsidiary Stock Dividend which they receive as holders of common stock of the Corporation.


5.            In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth in the Merger Agreement, the Investor hereby directs the Corporation to deliver to the Subsidiary any certificate otherwise deliverable to the Investor by reason of the Subsidiary Stock Dividend, and further agrees that if the Investor receives a certificate representing ownership of stock of the Subsidiary, the Investor shall promptly surrender such certificate to the Subsidiary for cancellation.


6.            This Agreement shall be binding on the Investor and the Investor’s heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns, including any transferee of the common stock of the Corporation held by the Investor; and this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be enforceable by the Subsidiary and its successors and assigns.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this instrument as of the 24th day of May, 2007.


Investor:


/s/ Huakang Zhou


Print Name:  Huakang Zhou
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20353]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,476]


L.G.S. and Company Breezeway Mobile Home Parts and Supply, 
Haleyville, Alabama; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on May 12, 1997 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on behalf of workers and former workers at L.G.S. and Company 
Breezeway Mobile Home Parts and Supply, located in Haleyville, Alabama 
(TA-W-33,476).
    The Department of Labor has verified that the petitioner was not a 
company official of the subject firm. Consequently, this is not a valid 
petition and the Department of Labor cannot make a determination as to 
whether the workers are eligible for adjustment assistance benefits 
under the Trade Act of 1974.
    Therefore, further investigation in this matter would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 10th day of July 1997.
Curtis K. Kooser,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-20353 Filed 7-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals 30128 02-AUG-2013 12:44 PM
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:Americans with disabilities**
 
1991-92 | 1994-95| 2002 | 2005 | 2010 | 2014
 
SuDoc:C3.186/43:
Item Number:0142-C-36 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000676854
 
November 29, 2017
No. 44349.

#### Protests 828660-G (A), etc., of Heinsheimer Bros., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is bodies, hoods, forms, or shapes similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were therefore sustained.
Order entered April 27, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00450-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.T., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-12-19981-S

ORDER

This is an appeal in a parental termination case. Before the Court is court 

reporter Joie Rivera’s April 23, 2020 letter requesting a ten-day extension to file 

the reporter’s record and informing the Court that she has been unable to obtain the 

exhibits.

We GRANT the request. To the extent the exhibits have not been made 

available to Ms. Rivera, we ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to 

give all original exhibits to Ms. Rivera no later than 3:00 p.m. on Wednesday, 

April 29, 2020 for use in preparing the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P.

34.6(g). Ms. Rivera shall return the original exhibits to Ms. Pitre within twenty-
four (24) hours of copying the exhibits for use in the record. See id. To the extent 

the exhibits are timely made available to Ms. Rivera, we ORDER the reporter’s 

record be filed no later than May 7, 2020.

If any of the original exhibits are in the possession of someone other than 

Ms. Pitre, Ms. Pitre shall notify the Court and Ms. Rivera in writing by 12:00 p.m. 

noon on Tuesday, April 28, 2020 of the name of the person, contact information 

for that person, and a list of the exhibits in that person’s possession. See id.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to the 

Honorable Kim Cooks, Presiding Judge of the 255th Judicial District Court; Ms. 

Pitre; Ms. Rivera; and the parties.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2258 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the rule 

providing 5-year amortization of expenses incurred in creating or acquiring music or music copyrights. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2012 

Ms. SNOWE (for herself, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. 

ALEXANDER, and Mr. CORKER) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the rule providing 5-year amortization of expenses incurred in creating or acquiring music or music 

copyrights. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Songwriters Tax Sim5 plification Reauthorization Act’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2258 IS

1 SEC. 2. SPECIAL RULE FOR AMORTIZATION OF MUSICAL 

2 WORKS AND COPYRIGHTS MADE PERMA3 NENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (8) of section 167(g) 

5 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik6 ing subparagraph (E). 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

9 December 31, 2010. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Alan L. Wells, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Alan L. WellsAlan L. WellsPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)November 11, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21104]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision
[AC-24; OTS No. 4727]


Hopkinsville Federal Savings Bank, Hopkinsville, Kentucky; 
Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on July 31, 1997, the Director, 
Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, or her designee, 
acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the application of 
Hopkinsville Federal Savings Bank, Hopkinsville, Kentucky, to convert 
to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application are 
available for inspection at the Dissemination Branch, Office of Thrift 
Supervision, 1700 G Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20552, and the 
Central Regional Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 200 West Madison 
Street, Suite 1300, Chicago, Illinois 60606.

    Dated: August 6, 1997.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21104 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
#### H. Kuri *v.*United States

No. 7858.

Entry No. 737812.

(Decided August 7, 1950)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawbence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the merchandise the subject of this appeal are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Gothic Watch Co.,*23 Cust. Ct. 235, Reap. Dec. 7712, affirming the judgment in *Gothic Watch Co.*v. *United States,*19 Cust. Ct. 309, Reap. Dec. 7438, and that the record in Reap. Dec. 7712, *supra,*may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts, I find that the attempted appraisement embodied in the second return of value by the appraiser of the merchandise covered by this appeal was illegal, null, and void, and that the appraiser’s original return of value, as reported by him to the collector of customs, constituted his appraisal of the merchandise pursuant to section 500 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1500), and was final and conclusive in the absence of any appeal pursuant to section 501 of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1501).

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00437-CV

Marlon Torres, Appellant

v.

Marilyn Roth, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GN201553, HONORABLE MARGARET A. COOPER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Marlon Torres filed his notice of appeal in this cause in July2003, and both

parties filed their briefs in August 2003. Also in August, appellee Marilyn Roth filed a motion to

dismiss, contending the appeal was mooted by the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in her

favor. Torres objected, asking that this appeal be consolidated with the appeal he intended to file

from the summary judgment. On October 2, 2003, we abated this appeal for ninety days, requesting

a status report from the parties. In December 2003, Torres filed a status report stating that although

the trial court had granted summary judgment in favor of Roth, Roth’s counterclaims remained

pending and, therefore, the summary judgment was not yet final and appealable. Torres informed

this Court that he had sought to have the summary judgment severed into a separate cause, rendering

it final, but that when Roth objected to the severance, the trial court denied Torres’s severance

request. A trial on Roth’s counterclaims was originally set for January 2004, but Roth, over Torres’s
2

objections, sought and was granted a continuance of that trial setting until late March 2004. Torres

requested that this Court continue the abatement until the trial court rendered a final judgment. We

continued the abatement until April 2004, again requesting a status report.

In late March 2004, Torres filed another status report, informing this Court that the

trial setting had been delayed again until December. Torres requested that the abatement be

continued, Roth did not object, and the Court granted Torres’s request, continuing the abatement

until January 2005, and in January, after receiving another status report, we again continued the

abatement until July 2005. In July, Torres filed a report stating that nothing had occurred at the trial

level and that the only outstanding claims are those belonging to Roth. Torres has requested that this

Court extend the abatement for another nine months. In August, this Courtreceived notice that Roth

had obtained new counsel.

This appeal has been pending in abatement for more than two years, with no sign of

an end. We therefore dismiss the appeal as moot and will await the appeal from a final judgment.

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear

Dismissed as Moot

Filed: November 10, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FLIGHTSERV.COM FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         526,657
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,995
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,318,426
<PP&E>                                      10,108,825
<DEPRECIATION>                                 546,983
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,969,054
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          967,828
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,342,183
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,222,059
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,969,054
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,118,478
<CGS>                                           93,561
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               56,485,775
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,011,716
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             862,975
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (57,335,549)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (57,335,549)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (600,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (57,935,549)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>