alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MOSS v. HERRING.

May 6, 1837.

*Rule to amend the writ of attachment of execution.*

A writ of attachment of execution may be amended by *the praecipe*so as to be made returnable to the first day of the next term after issuing-.

THIS was an attachment of execution, with a clause in the nature of a *scire facias,*against Robert Taylor, under the 35th section of the act of 16th June, 1836, relating to executions. The *praecipe*was to make the writ returnable on the first Monday of June, 1837, but the writ was made out by the prothonotary returnable to the first Monday of April, 1837; being a monthly return day. The plaintiff obtained a rule to show cause why the writ should not be amended so as to make the return day on the first Monday of June, 1837; being the first day of the next term of the court.

Hood, for the rule.

*Killer a,*contra.

Per Curiam.

The 35th section of the act of 16th June, 1836, prescribes that the debtor, &e. (garnishee,) shall be required to appear “ at the next term of the court, or at such other time as the court from which such process may issue shall appoint.” *(Stroud's Purd. tit.*Execution.<) Here the writ was made returnable to a monthly return day, and not to the “ next term” of the court. This was the accidental mistake of the prothonotary, and leave is given to amend the writ by the *praecipe,*and the court appoint the day named in the *prcecipe*for the return of the writ.

Rule absolute.
Exhibit 23.1



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-50508) pertaining to the Maxicare
Health Plans, Inc. 1990 Stock Option Plan, the stock option agreement
with Peter J. Ratican dated December 5, 1990, and the stock option
agreement with Eugene L. Froelich dated December 5, 1990; and the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8
(No. 333-12803) pertaining to the Maxicare Health Plans, Inc. Outside
Directors 1996 Formula Stock Option Plan, the Maxicare Health Plans,
Inc. Senior Executives 1996 Stock Option Plan, the Maxicare Health
Plans, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan, the Restricted Stock Grant
Agreement by and between Maxicare Health Plans, Inc. and Peter J.
Ratican dated as of February 27, 1995 and the Restricted Stock Grant
Agreement by and between Maxicare Health Plans, Inc. and Eugene L.
Froelich dated as of February 27, 1995 of our report dated February
19, 1999 with respect to the 1998 consolidated financial statements
and schedules of Maxicare Health Plans, Inc. in its annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.




                                 ERNST & YOUNG LLP




Los Angeles, California
March 26, 1999
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 150 (Tuesday, August 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20565]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Research, Engineering and Development (R,E&D) Advisory Committee

    Pursuant to section 10(A)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting 
of the FAA Research, Engineering and Development Advisory Committee. 
The meeting will be held on September 9-10, 1997 at the Holiday Inn 
Rosslyn Westpark Hotel, 1900 North Fort Myer Drive, Arlington, 
Virginia.
    On Tuesday, September 9, 1997 the meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. 
and end at 5:00 p.m. On Wednesday, September 10, 1997 the meeting will 
begin at 8:30 a.m. and end at 3:00 p.m. The meeting will consist of 
presentations on the FY 2005 Operational Concept, the NAS Architecture 
Version 3.0, the Flight 2000 Plan and FAA responses to committee 
recommendations.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
available. Persons wishing to attend the meeting or obtain information 
should contact Lee Olson at the Federal Aviation Administration, AAR-
200, 800 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20591 (202) 267-7358.
    Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
Committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC on July 29, 1997.
Jan Brecht-Clark,
Acting Director, Office of Aviation Research.
[FR Doc. 97-20565 Filed 8-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
No. 99-995.

#### SMS Systems Maintenance Services, Inc. *v.*Digital Equipment Corp.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RAHEEM GLADNEY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 5 EAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of June, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Edward James ARMSTEAD, Jr. and Larry S. Perkins v. C. Paul PHELPS, Secretary and Ross D. Maggio, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 59773.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 1977.

In re: Edward James Armstead, Jr. and Larry Steven Perkins applying for writ of certiorari, and/or mandamus and/or habeas corpus.

Application denied: Habeas corpus is not the proper remedy for this complaint.

DIXON and TATE, JJ., concurring in the denial, being of the opinion the administrative procedure act applies to the situation in this case, and appeals from final administrative decisions are governed by R.S. 49:964 (petition to be filed in district court, etc.)

SANDERS, C. J., also agrees with the concurring views of DIXON, J.

MARCUS, J., is of the opinion that the writ should be granted ordering an eviden-tiary hearing to determine the merit of relator’s assertions for habeas relief.

DENNIS, J., dissents from the denial of a writ. I have serious doubt that the administrative procedures act applies to prisoners asserting violations of constitutional rights. This ruling also may amount to an undue restriction upon the writ of habeas corpus in contravention of La.Const. art. I, Sec. 21 and art. V, Sec. 2. I would grant the writ and order an evidentiary hearing.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big Sky Industries III, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: January 23, 2009



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer

Big Sky Industries III, Inc.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2274
JAMES E. WRIGHT, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MASS TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION; WILLIAM F. COLLINS; EARLINE WARD; HASSELINE CROWDER; DEBRA CROSBY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96- 99-AMD) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 30, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James E. Wright, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen J. Masterton, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order adopting themagistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss his employment discrimination action filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wright v. Mass Transit Admin. , No. CA-96-99-AMD (D. Md. Aug. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EX-10.15



 






	 	 	 	 	 



EXHIBIT 10.15




HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP

DIRECTOR’S RETIREMENT PLAN




AMENDMENT TO EXISTING PLAN AGREEMENT





      On August 20, 2002, Heritage Bank of the South (the “Bank”) entered into an agreement with the
undersigned Director regarding his entitlement under the Heritage Financial Group Director’s
Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) (the “Plan Agreement”).



      The Bank now desires to amend the Director’s Plan Agreement to fully accrue his Plan benefit,
notwithstanding his actual years of credited service as a director of the Bank or Heritage
Financial Group.



      The Plan contemplates that the Plan Agreement may be amended by an agreement entered into by
the parties.



      NOW THEREFORE, it is AGREED:



      That effective as of the date hereof, for purposes of determining the Director’s entitlement
under the Plan, the Director shall be credited with fifteen (15) Years of Credited Service as a
Director.



Date: October 16, 2007




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Heritage Financial Group

 	 
	 	/s/ Antone D. Lehr
 	 
	 	By: Antone D. Lehr, Chairman 	 
	 	 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Director

 	 
	 	/s/ Lee Stanley
 	 
	 	Lee Stanley
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, each of the undersigned, directors and/or
officers of Echo Bay Mines Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby constitutes and appoints
LOIS-ANN L. BRODRICK, TOM S.Q. YIP and RONALD R. LEVINE and each or any one of
them, his or her true and lawful attorney or attorneys and agent or agents, with
full power of substitution, to do any and all acts and to execute in his or her
name, place and stead in such capacity or capacities (whether on behalf on of
the Company or otherwise) any and all instruments which said attorney or
attorneys and agent or agents may deem necessary or advisable to enable the
Company and each of the undersigned to comply with the United States Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any rules, regulations, requirements or
requests of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder or in respect
thereof in connection with the Form 10-K Annual Report of the Company for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, including specifically, but without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, power and authority to execute the
respective names of the undersigned directors and/or officers as indicated below
(whether on behalf of the Company or as a director and/or officer of the
Company) on Form 10-K or any other appropriate instrument relating to the Annual
Report of the Company, and each of the undersigned does hereby ratify and
confirm all that such attorney or attorneys and agent or agents or any one of
them shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF each of the undersigned has subscribed these presents
this 11th day of February, 2000.


/s/ John N. Abell                       /s/ Latham C. Burns
------------------------------------    --------------------------------------
John N. Abell, Director                 Latham C. Burns, Director


                                        /s/ John Gilray Christy
------------------------------------    --------------------------------------
Pierre Choquette, Director              John Gilray Christy, Director


/s/ Peter Clarke                        /s/ Robert L. Leclerc
------------------------------------    --------------------------------------
Peter Clarke, Director                  Robert L. Leclerc, Chairman and Chief
                                        Executive Officer and Director

/s/ John F. McOuat                      /s/ Monica E. Sloan
------------------------------------    --------------------------------------
John F. McOuat, Director                Monica E. Sloan, Director


/s/ R. Geoffrey P. Styles              /s/ David A. Ottewell
------------------------------------   ---------------------------------------
R. Geoffrey P. Styles, Director        Controller and Principal Accounting
                                       Officer

/s/ Tom S.Q. Yip
------------------------------------
Tom S.Q. Yip, Vice President and
Principal Financial Officer
FILED IN COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS August 27, 2015 ABELACOSTA, CLERK HARLEM HAROLD LEWIS, III V. THE STATE OF TEXAS No. AP-77,045 AP-77,045 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 8/27/2015 3:05:22 PM Accepted 8/27/2015 4:03:08 PM ABEL ACOSTA CLERK IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME


### COMES NOW, appellant, by and through his attorney ofrecord, Gerald E. Bourque, and in accordance with Rule 10.5(b) ofThe Texas Rules ofAppellate Procedure, hereby requests an extension oftime in which to file his Briefand would respectfully show: 1. Name ofTrial Court: 351st District Court 

### 2. Trial Court Style: 1428102, The State ofTexas v. Harlem Harold Lewis, III 3. Offense: Capital Murder 4. Punishment assessed: Death 5. Present Filing Deadline: September 7, 2015 

### 6. Length ofExtension Requested: 60 days 7. Number ofPrevious Extensions: One by current counsel ~~ 8. Good Cause for this Extension is as follows: This is a capital murder case and counsel was not the trial counsel. The record is voluminous and the case is 

### complex. Counsel was appointed to replace prior appellate counsel and has been studyingthe entirerecord inorderto identifypotential issues, conductthe necessary 

### research, and completethe brieffor appellant. The voluminous record requires an inordinate amount of time in order to complete these tasks. These tasks are necessary to provide the effective assistance ofcounsel.WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, appellant respectfully files this motion 

### before the expiration ofthe filing deadline, and prays for the requested extension. Respectfully submitted, /s/Gerald E. Bourque GERALD E. BOURQUE 

### Appointed Counsel for Appellant Attorney at Law 

### 24 Waterway Ave., Suite 660 The Woodlands, TX 77380 (713)862-7766 FAX: (832) 813-0321 

### gerald@geraldebourque.com TBL #02716500

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### This is to certify that a true and correctcopy ofthe foregoing Motion was served upon the counsel for the State by U.S. Mail on the date offiling hereof.

/s/Gerald E. Bourque GERALD E. BOURQUE
**JUN**
               OCT
				**MAY**12**2007**
               2008
				**2009****13 captures**
           22 Apr 05 - 22 Feb 10
   Close
       Help


**Marquette County**

Home

Return to Maps Page

County Map in PDF format

Click the name of the Waterfowl Production Area 
  below to see its map.



Aerial 
    Map  Topo 
    Map  3D 
    Map




>
**Exhibit 32**

** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of American Spectrum Realty, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William J. Carden, President,Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results ofoperations of the Company for the period indicated.

 

 
| */s/ William J. Carden*                                                 |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| William J.  Carden                                                      |
| President,  Chief Executive Officer  and Acting Chief Financial Officer |
|                                                                    |
| August 7,  2003                                                         |

 

----
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 16

- 00269

- CR

RAYMOND WEBER

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15

- 0773

O R D E R

Appellant’s “Motion for Oral Argument and Petition for Discretionary Review,

Request Conviction Overturned, if not o verturned, Request New Trial, if no c hanges,

R equest Sentence Reduction” was filed on July 10, 2017.

The motion for oral argument is denied; the petition for d iscretionary review is

dismissed for want of jurisdiction ; the request to ov erturn the convictio n is denied; theWeber v. Stat e Page 2

conditional request for new trial is denied; and the conditional request for a sentence

reduction is denied.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Order issued and filed July 2 6 , 2017
#### STATE of Louisiana, Appellee, v. Mark PATTERSON, Appellant.

No. 58922.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 16, 1977.

Elizabeth W. Cole, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., William L. Brockman, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.

TATE, Justice.

We find merit to Assignment of Error No. 1 raised by the defendant upon his conviction of armed robbery, La.R.S. 14:64.

Immediately prior to jury selection, the defendant moved “to dismiss the jury [pan*1166el list], since the selection of the jury panel did not comply with Article 784 in picking and selecting the panel list. Names should be drawn from a petit jury venire by a lottery in open court and in the manner to be determined by the Court. This was not complied with, since the jury [panel list] has already been chosen prior to the Court.”

Upon the court’s denial of the motion, the defendant objected. The prospective jurors were thereupon called for voir dire examination in the order shown by a 40-member jury panel list made up out of court by the parish jury commission, in a manner not shown by this record.

The motion and objection prior to jury selection were to the use of a jury panel list to call prospective jurors for voir dire examination in the order established by this list. Such order resulted from procedures conducted out of court, without supervision of the court or the presence of counsel.

In *State v. Hoffman,*La., 345 So.2d 1 (opinion on rehearing rendered April 26, 1977), we sustained a similar objection that this method of calling jurors in the order fixed by out-of-court proceedings violated La.C.Cr.P. art. 784: “In selecting a panel, names shall be drawn from the petit jury venire *indiscriminately and by lot in open court *** (Italics ours.)

The present appeal was argued and submitted for decision to this court before the argument and decision in *State v. Hoffman,*cited above. For the reasons set forth in that opinion, we reverse the present conviction and sentence, and we remand this case to the district court for a new trial in accordance with law.

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR A NEW TRIAL.
No. 96-5880.

#### Richardson *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 45364.

#### Protest 789476-G of John V. Carr & Son (Detroit).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On the record presented the protest was overruled.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





**STATEMENT
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Winston Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of Winsonic Digital Media Group, Ltd.
      (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(a)
      The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31,
      2008, to which this certification accompanies (the "Annual Report"), fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
      The
      information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




May
                15, 2008
            
            /s/
                Winston JohnsonWinston
                Johnson, Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer and Principal Financial
                Officer)
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/04

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 04 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■ ■ ■ ■

★

●

●

★

● ● ●

●
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1219 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2006 

Referred to the Committee on Resources 

AN ACT 

To authorize certain tribes in the State of Montana to enter 

into a lease or other temporary conveyance of water 

rights to meet the water needs of the Dry Prairie Rural 

Water Association, Inc. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

S 1219 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE OF WATER RIGHTS 

2 TO DRY PRAIRIE RURAL WATER ASSOCIA3 TION, INC. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes 

5 of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana (referred 

6 to in this section as the ‘‘Tribes’’) may, with the approval 

7 of the Secretary, enter into a lease or other temporary con8 veyance of water rights recognized under the Fort Peck9 Montana Compact (Montana Code Annotated 85–20–201) 

10 with the Dry Prairie Rural Water Association, Incor11 porated (or any successor non-Federal entity) for the pur12 pose of meeting the water needs of that association, in 

13 accordance with section 5 of the Fort Peck Reservation 

14 Rural Water System Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–382; 

15 114 Stat. 1454). 

16 (b) CONDITIONS OF LEASE.—With respect to a lease 

17 or other temporary conveyance described in subsection 

18 (a)— 

19 (1) the term of the lease or conveyance shall 

20 not exceed 100 years; and 

21 (2)(A) the lease or conveyance may be approved 

22 by the Secretary without monetary compensation to 

23 the Tribes; and 

24 (B) the Secretary shall not be subject to liabil25 ity for any claim relating to any compensation or 
3 

S 1219 RFH 

1 consideration received by the Tribes under the lease 

2 or conveyance. 

3 (C) NO PERMANENT ALIENATION OF WATER.— 

4 Nothing in this section authorizes a permanent alienation 

5 of any water by the Tribes. 

Passed the Senate February 1, 2006. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.