alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2426 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2426

        To suspend temporarily the duty on p-toluenesulfonamide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on p-toluenesulfonamide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. P-TOLUENESULFONAMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      p-                  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        Toluenesulfonamid                                                  31/2015.......
                        e (CAS No. 70-55-
                        3) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        2935.00.95)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Village of Oak Harbor *v.*The Oak Harbor Natural Gas Co.

*Municipal corporations*— Removal *of gas mains*— After *expiration of franchise*— Injunction—Consent *of public utilities commission.*

(No. 16498

Decided December 29, 1922.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Ottawa county.

*'Mr. John Duff,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs.*Graves-, *Stahl S Duff,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this- court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be, and the same hereby is, reversed, upon authority of *East Ohio Gas Co.*v. *Cleveland, ante,*489, No. 17485, decided’ at this present term, for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case.

*Judgment reversed.*

Hough, Wanamaker, Robinson, Jones, Matthias and Clark, JJ., concur.
#### Cornelius Cravens, *vs.*Emily Cravens, et al.

*Appeal from Van Burén.*

A mere verbal promise of A. to borrow money and purchase lands of the U. S. in the name of B., does not constitute an agency, and cannot be the basis of a decree for the conveyance of the lands so purchased by A., to B., upon a bill filed for that purpose.

This was a bill in chancery, filed by Cornelius Cravens against Emily Cravens, the administratrix, and the children and heirs of Oscar Cravens, deceased, for the conveyance of a tract of land purchased by the said Oscar, as it was alleged, as agent of said complainant. At the April term 1842, the bill was dismissed at complainants costs. From which decree the complainant appealed to this court.

The supposed grounds of equity are contained in the opinion of the court.

Humphreys, for complainant.

Wright, for defendant.

Per Curiam,

Mason, Chief Justice.

The bill in this case sets forth, that in the year 1839, the complainant settled and made valuable improvements upon the west half of the south west quarter of section 30, town. 68, north of range 11, west. That at the land sale in 1840, r.ot having money to enter the same, he made an agreement with his son Oscar Cravens, by which the latter was to attend said sale, borrow the necessary money, and purchase the land in the name of the complainant, and as his agent. It iurther alleges that the said Oscar Cravens, intending to deceive and defraud the said complainant, procured the said tract of land to be purchased in his own name, and that he afterwards died, leaving a wife and two children who are the real parties defendants in this suit. That administration of the estate of his said son, was subsequently granted to the wife erf the deceased, one of the defendants in the bill, and that he, the said complainant, afterwards tendered to her the amount of purchase money of the said tract, but that she refused to execute a deed therefor

The answer denies that Oscar Cravens purchased the land as agent *286for the complainant, but that it was entered by the said Oscar in his own right, and that there was an agreement and understanding between the said complainant and the said Oscar, that this land, which was timbered land, together with an equal tract of prairie land, which was to be entered by the said complainant, should be each equally divided between the two parties. It then alleges an offer on the part of Oscar Cravens to perform said agreement.

The proof, instead of overturning the answer, tends rather to support it. The most that is testified to by any of the complainant’s witnesses, is, that the said Oscar was to borrow money, go to the land sales, and purchase the land in the complainant’s name. This would not constitute an agency. It is a mere verbal promise, and (for ought that appears) without consideration, to do a certain act; and cannot be the basis for a decree for a conveyance.

The decree is therefore affirmed.
!( !(

!(

!(

!(

Rose Creek

Hiwassee Dam

UV1326

UV1314

UV1326

1

3

1

2

72

!( !(

!(

!(

!(

Rose Creek

Hiwassee Dam

UV1326

UV1314

UV1326

1

3

1

2

72

\\alismurphy\home\mprlm\projects\landplan\maps\Hiwassee_land_plan\Hiwassee_land_plan_for_Web.mxd

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000

Feet /

Hiwassee Reservoir

Land Management Plan Jul 24, 2008

Tile: A1
<PAGE>   1


                                   EXHIBIT 21
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  State
                                                                   of
                  Company                                     Incorporation
                  -------                                     -------------
         <S>                                                  <C>
         PMC Investment Corporation                              Florida
         Western Financial Capital Corporation                   Florida
         First Western SBLC, Inc.                                Florida
         PMC Funding Corp.                                       Florida
         PMC Advisers, Ltd.                                      Texas
         PMC Capital Corp. 1996-A                                Texas
         PMC Asset Management, Inc.                              Texas
         PMC Trust 1996-A                                        Delaware
         PMC Capital Limited Partnership                         Delaware
         Asset Investments Series A, L.L.C.                      Delaware
         First Western Series 1994-1 L.L.C.                      Delaware
         FW 97 L.L.C.                                            Delaware
         PMC Capital, L.P. 1998-1                                Delaware
         PMC Capital Corp. 1998-1                                Delaware
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 3.155

                           ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                              HORSE & RIDER, INC.

            The undersigned incorporator, being a natural person 18 years of age
or older, in order to form a corporate entity under California Statutes, General
Corporation Law, hereby adopts the following Articles of Incorporation:

                                    ARTICLE I

            The name of this Corporation is Horse & Rider, Inc.

                                   ARTICLE II

            The purpose of the Corporation is to engage in any lawful act or
activity for which a corporation may be organized under the General Corporation
Law of California other than the banking business, the trust company business or
the practice of a profession permitted to be incorporated by the California
Corporations Code.

                                   ARTICLE III

            The name of this corporation's initial agent for service of process
in the State of California is: C T CORPORATION SYSTEM.

                                   ARTICLE IV

            This Corporation is authorized to issue an aggregate total of 1,000
shares, all of which shall be designated Common Stock, having a par value of
$1.00 per share.

                                    ARTICLE V

            The name and address of the incorporator of this Corporation is as
follows:

                        Amy Tomczyk
                        2200 Harvest Center
                        90 South Seventh Street
                        Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402

                                   ARTICLE VI

            No shareholder of this Corporation shall have any preemptive rights
to subscribe for, purchase or acquire any shares of the Corporation of any
class, whether unissued or now or hereafter authorized, or any obligations or
other securities convertible into or exchangeable for any such shares.
<PAGE>

                                  ARTICLE VII

            Any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of the
Board of Directors of this Corporation not needing approval by the shareholders
under California Corporations Code, may be taken by written action signed by the
number of directors that would be required to take such action at a meeting of
the Board of Directors at which all directors are present.

                                  ARTICLE VIII

            The liability of the directors of this Corporation for monetary
damages shall be eliminated to the fullest extent permissible under California
law.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 10th day of
September, 1991.


                                                 /s/ Amy Tomczyk
                                           ------------------------------
                                           Amy Tomczyk, Incorporator

                                                                          [SEAL]


                                       -2-
**-  Northern Plains  
-  Logan, UT 
-  Forage and Range Research 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search  UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">		You are here: 						Research / 																				**Research Project:**DEVELOP AND/OR USE MOLECULAR TOOLS TO IDENTIFY AND CLONE DESIRABLE GENES FROM RANGELAND PLANTS
**Location: Forage and Range Research**
												Project Number: 5428-21000-012-03Project Type:Specific Cooperative Agreement

Start Date: Sep 01, 2005End Date: Aug 31, 2010

**Objective:**The objectives 1) construct bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)libraries with an average insert size of 130 kb or larger for an interspecific hybrid of Leymus, specifically L. cinereus X L. triticoides, 2) array selected clones in microplates and spot them onto library filters, 3) use the filter set in screenings with probes for candidate genes conferring desirable traits in the Leymus hybrid, and 4) sequence the BAC clones containing those desirable genes.
**Approach:**Young leaves of the hybrid L. cinereus X L. triticoides will be sent to the University for genomic DNA extraction.  The University will use two restriction enzymes in cutting genomic DNA and ligate DNA fragments of 130 kb or larger into vectors.  A BAC library of 387,072 clones, providing a 5X coverage of the genome, will be individually arrayed in 384-well microplates and stored in a -80 degree C freezer.  The University will spot all BAC clones onto five sets of 21 filters, each contains 36,864 spots representing duplicated 18,432 clones.  ARS scientists will use the filter sets in screenings of candidate genes in Leymus species for desirable traits.  Clones identified as containing desirable genes will be sequenced and annotated by ARS.  Molecular markers, using primers designed on the basis of DNA sequences of these desirable genes, will be developed and validated in the segregating Leymus hybrid progenies by ARS scientists.
    Project TeamWANG, RICHARD LARSON, STEVEN BUSHMAN, SHAUN  
Project Annual Reports FY 2010 FY 2009 FY 2008 FY 2007 FY 2006 
Related National Programs Pasture, Forage and Rangeland Systems(215)  							Last Modified: 04/02/2012 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
# C_2013026EN.01005101.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/51

---

Action brought on 22 October 2012 — Sothys Auriac v OHIM — Grand Hotel Primavera (BEAUTY GARDEN)

(Case T-470/12)

2013/C 26/103

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sothys Auriac (Auriac, France) (represented by: A. Berthet, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Grand Hotel Primavera SA (Borgo Maggiore, Saint-Martin)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the present action to be admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the present action to be admissible;

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 July 2012 on Case R 11419/2011-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 July 2012 on Case R 11419/2011-1;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: BEAUTY GARDEN for goods in Classes 3, 5, 29, 30 and 32 — Community trade mark No 3 456 134

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: Grand Hotel Primavera SA

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: National figurative mark containing the word element ‘BEAUTY GARDEN’ for goods in Classes 3 and 5

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Application upheld in part

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal rejected in part and decision of the Cancellation Division annulled in part and revised by the Board of Appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law:

Pleas in law:

| — | Infringement of Article 76(1) and Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 76(1) and Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009

| — | Infringement of the general principle that reasons must be given in OHIM decisions and that the adversarial nature of proceedings must be observed. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the general principle that reasons must be given in OHIM decisions and that the adversarial nature of proceedings must be observed.

---
#### In the Matter of David Ira Moed, an Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Third Judicial Department, Petitioner.

[614 NYS2d 330]

Per Curiam.

Motion by petitioner Committee on Professional Standards for order (1) suspending respondent, a Florida attorney admitted to practice by this Court in 1987, by reason of his failure to appear at a hearing as directed by order of this Court entered February 18, 1994; and (2) authorizing petitioner to forward certain bank records obtained in connection with its investigation to the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida.

Upon consideration of the papers filed in support of the *853motion and no papers having been received in opposition, the motion is granted.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that petitioner’s motion is granted and respondent is suspended from practice, effective immediately and until further order of this Court, pending his compliance with this Court’s order entered February 18, 1994, and it is further ordered that respondent be and hereby is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as an agent, clerk or employee of another; and he hereby is forbidden to appear as attorney and counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or of any advice in relation thereto; and it is further ordered that respondent shall comply with the provisions of section 806.9 (22 NYCRR 806.9) of the rules of this Court regulating the conduct of disbarred, suspended or resigned attorneys, and it is further ordered that petitioner is authorized to forward the bank records referred to in its motion papers to the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 20, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-51271

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LUIS ALBERTO SANTANA, 

also known as Victor Manuel Vivas,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-02-CR-41-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Luis Alberto Santana appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of attempting to possess with the

intent to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine, in violation

of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846. Santana contends that he was

improperly sentenced under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B) because that

portion of 21 U.S.C. § 841 was rendered unconstitutional by

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). Santana
No. 02-51271

-2-

concedes that his argument is foreclosed by our opinion in United

States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 581-82 (5th Cir. 2000), which

rejected a broad Apprendi-based attack on the constitutionality

of 21 U.S.C. § 841. He raises the issue only to preserve it for

Supreme Court review. 

A panel of this court cannot overrule a prior panel’s

decision in the absence of an intervening contrary or superseding

decision by this court sitting en banc or by the United States

Supreme Court. Burge v. Parish of St. Tammany, 187 F.3d 452, 466

(5th Cir. 1999). No such decision overruling Slaughter exists. 

Accordingly, Santana’s argument is indeed foreclosed. The

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. The Government asks that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications NOAA-NMFS-F/NWC-201: Status Review for Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon 
Figure 3. Counts of adult fall chinook salmon at Lower Granite Dam sinceits completion in 1975. Estimates of the number of wild fish are obtained by subtracting estimated number of hatchery fish from the total. Based on data in Table 5; see text for discussion of estimation procedures. 

Use your browser's BACK button to return to the text.

Table of Contents
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of New England Bancshares,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, David J. O'Connor,
President,  Chief Executive  Officer and chief financial officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of and for the period  covered by
                  the Report.




                                            /s/ David J. O'Connor
                                            --------------------------
                                            David J. O'Connor
                                            Chief Executive Officer and Director
                                            August 13, 2007
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Planar Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending September 27, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Balaji Krishnamurthy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




By:

/s/    BALAJI
KRISHNAMURTHYBalaji Krishnamurthy President
and Chief Executive Officer





December 23, 2002
No. 96-1182.

#### Anderson *v.*Holifield et ux.

Ct. App. Cal., 6th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.