alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMEDICS
INC.'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 30, 1995 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                          37,370
<SECURITIES>                                    77,916
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,309
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,982
<INVENTORY>                                     42,679
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               209,519
<PP&E>                                          30,302
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,369
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 368,150
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,406
<BONDS>                                         45,201
<COMMON>                                         3,399
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     163,611
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   368,150
<SALES>                                        175,754
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               175,754
<CGS>                                           97,290
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   97,290
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   689
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,677
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,730
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,154
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,121
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,121
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
**“Take 10” Turnkey Kit**

**Letter to the Editor**

*Customize this letter with information specific to your community’s past census mail participation rates or your local challenge. Place this letter on your letterhead (if applicable) before sending. When submitting a letter to the editor, please keep the following in mind:*

1. *Call your local publication and ask where to e-mail, mail or fax your letter.*

2. *Some publications have word limits on letters to the editor. Ask your publication what its guidelines are for length or word count.*

3. *Localize the letter as much as possible. Elements you may want to research may include:*

a. *Is your state at risk of losing a seat in Congress?*

b. *Can you quantify the impact of an undercount?*

c. *What local initiative would a complete count help fund?*

4. *Be sure to sign your name and include your phone number so the publication can call and verify you as the author.*

<<Date>>

Dear Editor, 

In March 2010, every household across the nation will receive a census form. Required once every 10 years by the U.S. Constitution, the 2010 Census will count every man, woman and child living in the United States. 

Every year the federal government distributes more than $400 billion to tribal, state and local governments based on census data. But a lack of participation can result in our community and nation receiving less federal funding and less access to important services and resources than we might otherwise have received. <<add information about local initiatives>>  

Census data also are used to reapportion seats in Congress and assure proper district representation in state and local governments. <<add any information about losing congressional seats>> An accurate count will help ensure the people in this community are fairly represented in all levels of government.

During Census 2000, XX percent of households in <<City/State>> returned their census forms by mail. Nationally, 72 percent did so as of the April 2000 cut-off. I believe we can do even better in 2010. That’s why today, <<I/we>> <<am/are>> issuing a challenge to everyone in <<City/State>> to take 10 minutes to participate in the census by answering the 10-question census form. Together, we can create a better tomorrow for ourselves, our family and our community. 

Sincerely,

<<Name>>

<<Title>>

<<Organization Name>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 145 (Tuesday, July 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19823]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (97-100)]


Information Collection: Submission for OMB Review, Comment 
Request

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of agency report forms under OMB review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration has 
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) the following 
proposal for the collection of information under the provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received on or before August 
28, 1997.

ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to Mr. Harry Lupuloff, 
Office of the General Counsel, Code GP, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, Washington, DC 20546-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carmela Simonson, Office of the 
Chief Information Officer, (202) 358-1223.
    Reports: None.
    Title: Application for a Patent License.
    OMB Number: 2700-0039.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Need and Uses: The information supplied is used by the NASA 
Associate General Counsel to make agency determinations that NASA 
should either grant or deny a request for a patent license, and whether 
the license should be exclusive, partially exclusive, or nonexclusive.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households, business or other for-
profit.
    Number of Respondents: 45.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 45.
    Hours Per Request: 6.
    Annual Burden Hours: 270.
    Frequency of Report: Annually.
Donald J. Andreotta,
Deputy Chief Information Officer (Operations), Office of the 
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-19823 Filed 7-28-97, 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: November 13, 2014

TO: 111(b) Rule for New Construction of Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0495

FROM: Howard J. Hoffman, EPA - OGC

SUBJECT: Nov. 13, 2014 Meeting with GE Regarding Proposed 111(b) Rule for New 

Construction of Power Plants

SUMMARY

On Nov. 13, 2014, EPA-OGC and OAQPS met with General Electric (GE) to discuss legal 

issues concerning the proposed CAA section 111(b) rule for new construction of power plants.

ATTENDEES

Avi Garbow, Ethan Shenkman, Lorie Schmidt, Scott Jordan, and Steve Silverman of EPA-OGC 

Nick Hutson and Christian Fellner of OAQPS 

Michael Fitzpatrick, Patric Hedren, Larry Boggs, and Andy Dicke of General Electric (GE)

Chet M. Thompson of Crowell & Moring LLP and Charles H. Knauss of Katten Muchin 

Rosenman LLP, both counsel to GE
Amendment to the Wyeth 2002 Stock Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.2 
 AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 
 WYETH 2002 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 WYETH 1999 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

 WYETH 1996 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 Effective as of September 27, 2007, the Wyeth 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, the Wyeth 1999 Stock Incentive Plan and the Wyeth 1996 Stock Incentive Plan were amended as follows: 
 Section 8 was amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
 Section 8. Adjustment in Event of Change in Stock. Subject to Section 9, in the event of a stock split, stock dividend, cash dividend (other than a regular cash dividend), combination of shares,
merger, or other relevant change in the Company’s capitalization, the Committee shall adjust in the manner determined by the Committee in its sole discretion to be appropriate (i) the number and kind of shares available for issuance under
the Plan, (ii) the number, kind and Option Price of shares subject to outstanding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights and/or (iii) the number and kind of shares subject to outstanding Restricted Stock awards; provided, however, that,
except in the case of incentive stock options, the number, kind and Option Price of shares subject to outstanding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights shall be adjusted in the manner described in Section 1.409A-1(b)(5)(v)(D) of the Treasury
Regulations; provided, further, that to the extent permitted in the case of incentive stock options by Sections 422 and 424 of the Code, in the event that the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company are increased or decreased
or changed into or exchanged for a different number or kind of shares or other securities of the Company or of another corporation, through reorganization, merger, consolidation, liquidation, recapitalization, reclassification, stock split-up,
combination of shares or dividend, appropriate adjustment in the number and kind of shares as to which Options may be granted and as to which Options or portions thereof then unexercised shall be exercisable, and in the Option Price thereof, shall
be made to the end that the proportionate number of shares or other securities as to which Options may be granted and the Participant’s proportionate interests under outstanding Options shall be maintained as before the occurrence of such
event; provided, that any such adjustment in shares subject to outstanding Options (including any adjustments in the Option Price) shall be made in such manner as not to constitute a modification as defined by subsection (h)(3) of Section 424
of the Code; and provided, further, that, in the event of an adjustment in the number or kind of shares under a Restricted Stock award pursuant to this Section 8, any new shares or units issued to the Participant in respect
thereof shall be subject to the same terms, conditions and restrictions as the underlying Restricted Stock award for which the adjustment was made. 
  

 1
No. 39150.

#### Protest 313619-G of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that certain items consist of articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
**EXHIBIT
      31.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Robert
      T. Faber, certify that:




1. I
      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GoldSpring,
      Inc.;




2.Based
      on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement
      of
      a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were
      made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;





3.Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects
      the
      financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.
      I am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
      have:





a)designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
      relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
      known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
      in
      which this annual report is being prepared;





b)evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as
      of a
      date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the
      "Evaluation Date"); and





c)
      presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the
      disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
      Date;





5.
      I have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors
      and
      the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):





a)all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
      could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize,
      and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors
      any
      material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.





/s/ ROBERT
                T. FABERRobert
                T. Faber*President
                and Chief Executive Officer and*
              *Chief
                Financial Officer*




Date:
      November 10, 2008
# C_2012303EN.01001601.xml

| 6.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/16

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van Koophandel te Gent (Belgium) lodged on 19 July 2012 — Euronics Belgium CVBA v Kamera Express BV & Kamera Express Belgium BVBA

(Case C-343/12)

2012/C 303/28

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank van Koophandel te Gent

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Euronics Belgium CVBA

Defendants:

| | Kamera Express BV |
| --- | --- |

Kamera Express BV

| | Kamera Express Belgium BVBA |
| --- | --- |

Kamera Express Belgium BVBA

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 101 of the (Belgian) Law on market practices and consumer protection (Wet betreffende marktpraktijken en consumentenbescherming), which, inter alia, is intended to protect the interests of consumers and is worded as follows:

‘Article 101(1)All undertakings shall be prohibited from offering for sale or selling goods at a loss.

A sale at a loss shall mean any sale at a price which is not at least equal to the price at which the undertaking purchased the item or which the undertaking would have to pay to replenish its stock, after any discounts granted and definitively obtained. In order to determine whether a sale is a sale at a loss, no account shall be taken of discounts which, whether exclusive or non-exclusive, are granted in exchange for commitments entered into by the undertaking other than for the purchase of goods’,

contrary to Directive 2005/29/EC (1) in so far as it prohibits sales at a loss, whereas Directive 2005/29/EC appears not to prohibit such sales practices and the Belgian Law may be stricter than the provisions of Directive 2005/29/EC and the prohibition under Article 4 of that directive?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2005 L 149, p. 22).

1

---
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001

50–913 PDF 2009

[ERRATA] 

THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION’S DISADVANTAGED 

BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM 

(111–18) 

HEARING 

BEFORE THE

COMMITTEE ON 

TRANSPORTATION AND 

INFRASTRUCTURE 

UNITED STATES HOUSE OF 

REPRESENTATIVES 

ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION 

MARCH 26, 2009 

( 

Printed for the use of the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

[ERRATA] 

HRG. 111-18 

An error was made on the cover of Committee Hearing 111-18, 

titled, ‘‘The Department of Transportation’s Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program.’’ The Congress number should read ‘‘One 

Hundred Eleventh Congress.’’
Exhibit 10.27

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
OPTION GRANTS AND SALARIES OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS:
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 the following salaries were paid and option grants were
approved:

|POSITION                                                    | SALARY | OPTION SHARES
|----------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | -------------
|                                                           
|Peter T. Kissinger, Ph.D                                    |        |              
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Scientific Officer          |        |              
|Richard M. Shepperd(1)                                      |        |              
|President and Chief Executive Officer                       |        |              
|Ronald E. Shoup, Ph.D                                       |        |              
|Chief Operating Officer, BASi Contract Research Services    |        |              
|Michael R. Cox                                              |        |              
|Vice President, Finance; Chief Financial Officer; Treasurer |        |              
|Edward M. Chait, Ph.D                                       |        |              
|Executive Vice President & Chief Scientific Officer         |        |              
|Candice B. Kissinger                                        |        |              
|Senior Vice President, R&D; Secretary and Director          |        |              
|Craig S. Bruntlett, Ph.D                                    |        |              
|Senior Vice President, Sales Development                    |        |              
|Lina L. Reeves-Kerner                                       |        |              
|Vice President, Human Resources                             |        |              

(1) Mr. Shepperd joined the Company October 1, 2006. He also has
a bonus arrangement
whereby he is paid 10% of EBITDA each quarter, to a maximum
of $150,000 per quarter.

OPTION GRANTS AND FEES PAID TO DIRECTORS:

The following compensation schedule for Directors was approved:

|                                              | 
|--------------------------------------------- | 
|Annual Retainer:                              | 
|Stock Options (three year vesting):           | 
|Attendance Fee per Meeting:                   | 
|Audit Committee Chairman (separate retainer): | 
|Chairman of the Board                         | 
|All other Committee Chairmen:                 |
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VILMA GLADIS CHAVEZ DE

PERDOMO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-74005

Agency No. A088-111-708

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 22, 2014** 

Before: GOODWIN, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Vilma Gladis Chavez De Perdomo, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions pro se for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is

governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a

FILED

JUL 30 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
motion to reopen. Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 992 (9th Cir. 2008). We

deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying as untimely Chavez De

Perdomo’s motion to reopen to seek adjustment of status, where she failed to

establish any exception to the filing deadline for motions to reopen. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(c)(2) (requiring motions to reopen not qualifying for an exception to

comply with the general 90-day filing deadline); see also Toufighi, 538 F.3d at 993

(noting that a “motion to reopen to apply for adjustment of status” is “still bound

by the usual ninety-day deadline for motions to reopen”).

We lack jurisdiction to review either the BIA’s refusal to exercise its sua

sponte authority to reopen Chavez De Perdomo’s removal proceedings, see

Toufighi, 538 F.3d at 993 n.8, or Chavez De Perdomo’s request for prosecutorial

discretion, see Vilchiz-Soto v. Holder, 688 F.3d 642, 644 (9th Cir. 2012) (order).

We also lack jurisdiction to review Chavez De Perdomo’s unexhausted

request to reopen based on changed country conditions. See Tijani v. Holder,

628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (“We lack jurisdiction to review legal claims

not presented in an alien’s administrative proceedings before the BIA.”). In

addition, the news article that Chavez De Perdomo references in her opening brief

lies beyond the scope of our review. See Chavez-Perez v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 1284,

2 12-74005
1290 n.7 (9th Cir. 2004) (“[W]e may not consider any information beyond what

the BIA had before it at the time of its decision.”).

Finally, we lack jurisdiction to review the immigration judge’s conduct of

Chavez De Perdomo’s underlying removal hearing because this petition for review

is untimely as to those proceedings. See Membreno v. Gonzales, 425 F.3d 1227,

1229 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc) (requiring any petition for review to be “filed not

later than 30 days after the date of the final order of removal” (citation omitted)).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

3 12-74005
**Exhibit 23.2**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

Nobel Learning Communities, Inc 

West Chester, Pennsylvania 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-64701, No. 333-61372, No. 333-61374, No. 333-124247 and No. 333-140507) of Nobel Learning Communities, Inc. of our report dated September 12, 2006, except for Note 6 which is asof September 10, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements which appear in this Form 10-K. 

BDO Seidman, LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

September 10, 2007