alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2210 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2210

To provide that Members of Congress shall not receive a cost of living 
                     adjustment in pay during 2013.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 20, 2012

  Mr. Tester introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that Members of Congress shall not receive a cost of living 
                     adjustment in pay during 2013.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Pay Raise for Congress Act of 
2012''.

SEC. 2. NO COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT IN PAY OF MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no adjustment shall be 
made under section 601(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 
(2 U.S.C. 31) (relating to cost of living adjustments for Members of 
Congress) during 2013.
                                 <all>
```
No. 45356.

#### Protests 14309-K, etc., of Ansel W. Robison (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On the authority of *Robison*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 310, C. D. 349) the dog biscuit meal in question was held dutiable at 15 percent under paragraph 733 and T. D. 49753 as claimed.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2195 

To require Members and employees of Congress and other Federal employees 

who file under the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to disclose delinquent tax liability. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2012 

Mr. BROWN of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To require Members and employees of Congress and other 

Federal employees who file under the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to disclose delinquent tax liability. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional and 

5 Federal Employee Tax Accountability Act of 2012’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2195 IS

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE ETHICS IN GOVERNMENT ACT 

2 OF 1978. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 102(a) of the Ethics in 

4 Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by 

5 adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(9)(A) The amount of any delinquent tax liability 

7 owed to the United States or any State or local govern8 ment entity. 

9 ‘‘(B) In this paragraph, the term ‘delinquent tax li10 ability’ means any tax liability which has been assessed 

11 and with respect to which all judicial and administrative 

12 remedies have been exhausted, or have lapsed. 

13 ‘‘(C) Information provided pursuant to this para14 graph shall not be subject to public disclosure.’’. 

15 (b) INCLUSION IN REPORT.—Section 102(b)(1)(A) of 

16 the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) 

17 is amended by striking ‘‘paragraph (1)’’ and inserting 

18 ‘‘paragraphs (1) and (9)’’. 

19 SEC. 3. ETHICS INQUIRY. 

20 If an individual reports a delinquent tax liability on 

21 the individual’s annual disclosure form required under sec22 tion 102(a)(9) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 

23 (as added by section 2), the appropriate supervising ethics 

24 office shall immediately open an inquiry into the tax delin25 quency of that individual for purposes of— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2195 IS

1 (1) determining the total delinquent tax liability 

2 of the individual; 

3 (2) determining the reason the individual has 

4 incurred a delinquent tax liability; 

5 (3) determining whether the individual has a 

6 plan to eliminate such delinquent tax liability; and 

7 (4) determining whether such delinquent tax li8 ability has reflected poorly on Congress or the em9 ploying agency. 

10 SEC. 4. FEDERAL TAX LIABILITY. 

11 An individual who discloses a delinquent tax liability 

12 under section 102(a)(9) of the Ethics in Government Act 

13 of 1978 (as added by section 2) shall, not later than 12 

14 months after filing the form, arrange with the relevant 

15 payroll office and the Internal Revenue Service to have 

16 the individual’s salary reduced by an amount appropriate 

17 to pay the taxes owed to the United States within a rea18 sonable time period. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 48894.

#### Protests 516526-G, etc., of Lun Tai & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Quong Yuen Shing Co.*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247) the merchandise was found to contain salt and was therefore excluded from paragraph 5. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Case No. 9,386.

#### MECHANICS’ BANK OF ALEXANDRIA v. TAYLOR et al.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 507.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1824.

Fraudulent Conveyances — Deed to Wife-Money Used in Purchase.

It is no fraud in a husband toward his creditors. to purchase real estate with the money which belonged to the wife before the marriage, and to take the deed directly to the wife, pursuant to a verbal agreement to that effect made with her before the marriage.

The bill states that the complainants levied an execution issued on a judgment in their favor against E. P. Taylor, upon a house and lot which were purchased by him with his own funds and fraudulently conveyed to his wife; that the complainants purchased it at the marshal’s sale, under the fieri facias; that E. P. Taylor refuses to give them possession; and prays that the deed to the defendant’s wife, and the deed from the defendant E. P. Taylor to the defendant David Marie may be set aside; and that the defendants may deliver possession of the premises to the complainants, and account for the rents and profits. The defendant Marie, in his answer, stated that he held a lien on the property for a debt of $205 under a deed purporting to be from E. P. Taylor and his wife, but executed only by E. P. Taylor. The separate answers of E. P. Taylor and wife, aver that the wife, having been a widow, and in trade before her intermarriage with E. P. T. had acquired considerable property, and had, at the time of the marriage, about $8,000 in bank: and that it was agreed between them, before the marriage, that it should be laid out in building a house upon a lot belonging to the wife; but that the lot being supposed to be too small, the intention to build was abandoned, and in lieu thereof the house and lot in question were purchased by E. r. T. with the wife’s money, and conveyed directly by the vendor to the wife; denying all fraud, &c. The cause being, by consent, set for hearing on bill and answer.

THE COURT

(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent)

decided that the claim of the wife was fair and upon a valuable ’ consideration, and dismissed the bill.
July 1, 2015

Mr. Bryce Fountain

80 Ravens Croft

Vernon, CT 06066

Dear Mr. Fountain

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your April 17, 2015

, exemption request into the public docket

(No. FAA− 20 15

− 1234 ), but we are unable to process your request any further. The

information you sent does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket w ithout notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

B renda Robeson

P rogram Anal yst

, A ircraft and

Airpor t Rules Division

Enclosure
#### William Long, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Gabriel Long, for the use of Jesse D. Walling, defendant in error.

*Error to Muscatine.*

Where a cause is still pending in the court below, the Supreme Court will not entertain a question brought up by consent of parties.

It ¡3 not the province of the Supreme Court to give advice to the District Courts.

Gabriel Long for the use of Jesse D. Walling had sued William Long in an action of debt, and a judgment was rendered for the plaintiff at the Juno term, 1839, and the case was taken to the Supreme Court and reversed at the July term, 1840, and a new trial ordered.— The opinion of the court and writ of procedendo were filed in the clerks office September 13, 1841. At May term 1843, the defendant moved the court to .strike lite cause from the docket, for reason that the same had in effect been discontinued. And at October term, 1843, the motion to strike the cause from the docket was overruled, to which the defendant excepied. And by the parties it was agreed that the cause should go to the Supreme Court for decision at the January term, 1844.

Whicher, for plaintiff in error.

Hastings, for defendant in error.

*382Per Curiam,

Mason, Chief Justice.

A motion in this case for a discontinuance was overruled by the District Court. Without proceeding farther in that court the parties consent to bring the question relative to the discontinuance into this court. We shall decline acting in tho matter. It is not our province to give advice to the District Courts and our legitimate business furnishes us sufficient employment. The decision of the District Court now objected to, leaves this case still pending there. While it is so pending we will not entertain it here, even by consent of parties. The case will therefore be dismissed.
##### Table of Contents



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-K/A
 Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K
 Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 For the Fiscal Year Ended 
November 30, 2009
    
    Commission File Number
001-31643
 CCA INDUSTRIES, INC.
  DELAWARE
    
    04-2795439(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 200 Murray Hill Parkway, East Rutherford, New Jersey 07073
 (201) 330-1400
  
 
 Yes o No þ
 o þ
 þ o
 o
  Large accelerated filer o
    
    Accelerated filer o
    
    Non-accelerated filer o
    
    Smaller reporting company
þ(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 o þ
  Class of Voting Stock
    
    Market Value5,514,866 shares; Common 
Stock, $.01 par value
    
    $16,820,341




---



##### 



TABLE OF CONTENTS
  
  Item
    
    
    PageAmendment to PART II9A.Controls and Procedures
    
    
    2 - 4Signatures
    
    
    5




---



##### Table of Contents



EXPLANATORY NOTE
 OVERVIEW
  
 Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
     -2-




---



##### Table of Contents



Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
        -3-




---



##### Table of Contents



/s/ DAVID EDELLDavid Edell, Chief Executive Officer/s/ STEPHEN A. HEITStephen A. Heit, Chief Financial Officer  -4-




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  CCA INDUSTRIES, INC.By:
    /s/ Dunnan EdellDUNNAN EDELL, President  Signature
    
    Title
    
    Date/s/ David Edell

DAVID EDELL
    
    Chief Executive Officer, Director
    
    April 13, 2010/s/ Ira W. Berman

IRA W. BERMAN
    
    Chairman of the Board of
Directors, Executive
Vice President, Secretary
    
    April 13, 2010/s/ Dunnan Edell

DUNNAN EDELL
    
    President, Chief Operating Officer,
Director
    
    April 13, 2010/s/ Stephen Heit

STEPHEN HEIT
    
    Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer
    
    April 13, 2010/s/ Drew Edell

DREW EDELL
    
    Vice President, Research
& Development
    
    April 13, 2010/s/ Stanley Kreitman

STANLEY KREITMAN
    
    Director
    
    April 13, 2010/s/ Robert Lage

ROBERT LAGE
    
    Director
    
    April 13, 2010/s/ Jack Polak

JACK POLAK
    
    Director
    
    April 13, 2010/s/ James P. Mastrian

JAMES P. MASTRIAN
    
    Director
    
    April 13, 2010
  -5-
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-1188 Directorate ID: 2012-SW-049-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Model EC135 P1, EC135 P2, EC135 P2+, 

EC135 T1, EC135 T2, and EC135 T2+ Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 244 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: These actions are intended to detect a crack on the hub-shaft flange, which if not 

corrected could result in failure of the main rotor hub and subsequent loss of control of the 

helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $55,715 for replacement

Labor per Helicopter

(2.5 x $85/work-hour for 

the inspection)

(8 x $85/work-hour for the 

replacement)

$212

$680

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $212 per inspection cycle

$56,395 for the replacement

Total US Fleet Cost $51,850 per inspection cycle

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Gary Roach
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2267 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2267

     To reauthorize the Hudson River Valley National Heritage Area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 2012

Mrs. Gillibrand introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To reauthorize the Hudson River Valley National Heritage Area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF HUDSON RIVER VALLEY NATIONAL HERITAGE 
              AREA.

    Section 910 of the Hudson River Valley National Heritage Area Act 
of 1996 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; Public Law 104-333) is amended by striking 
``2012'' and inserting ``2022''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 91 (Monday, May 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26960-26961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10839]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9910-76-OA]

National Environmental Education Advisory Council

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, EPA gives notice of 
a meeting of the National Environmental Education Advisory Council 
(NEEAC). The NEEAC was created by Congress to advise, consult with, and 
make recommendations to the Administrator of the Environmental 
Protection Agency (EPA) on matters related to activities, functions and 
policies of EPA under the National Environmental Education Act (Act). 
20 U.S.C. Sec.  5508(b).
    The purpose of these meeting(s) is to discuss specific topics of 
relevance for consideration by the council in order to provide advice 
and insights to the Agency on environmental education.

[[Page 26961]]

DATES: The National Environmental Education Advisory Council will hold 
a public meeting (teleconference) on Tuesday May 27, 2014 from 9:00 
a.m. to 10:00 a.m. (Mountain Standard Time) 11:00 a.m.-12:00 noon 
(Eastern Time).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Javier Araujo, Designated Federal 
Officer, araujo.javier@epa.gov, 202-564-2642, U.S. EPA, Office of 
Environmental Education, William Jefferson Clinton North, Room 1426, 
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Members of the public wishing to gain access 
to the meeting, make brief oral comments, or provide a written 
statement to the NEEAC must contact Javier Araujo, Designated Federal 
Officer, at araujo.javier@epa.gov or 202-564-2642 by 10 business days 
prior to each regularly scheduled meeting.
    Meeting Access: For information on access or services for 
individuals with disabilities or to request accommodations please 
contact Javier Araujo at araujo.javier@epa.gov or 202-564-2642, 
preferably at least 10 days prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much 
time as possible to process your request.

    Dated: May 5, 2014.
Javier Araujo,
Designated Federal Officer.
Sarah N. Sowell,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Environmental Education.
[FR Doc. 2014-10839 Filed 5-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADDED BY**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of and for the period covered by the                Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November                13, 2006 | /s/                Kenneth A. Martinek                           |
|----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                             | Kenneth                A. Martinek                               |
|                             | President                and Chief Executive Officer             |
|                             |                                                             |
|                             |                                                             |
|                             |                                                             |
| November                13, 2006 | /s/                Salvatore Randazzo                            |
|                             | Salvatore                Randazzo                                |
|                             | Executive                Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
|                             | and                Treasurer                                     |
No. 54392.

#### W. X. Huber Co. *v.*United States,

protest 37039-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise are similar in all material respects to the articles the subject of *Rolls Razor, Inc.*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 480), Abstract 51306, and Abstract 51893. The claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was therefore sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JULY 3, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 3, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1998
<CASH>                                             931
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  144,135
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,839
<INVENTORY>                                     94,589
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               256,739
<PP&E>                                         167,557
<DEPRECIATION>                                  81,753
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 616,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          149,160
<BONDS>                                        188,029
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,151
<OTHER-SE>                                     250,509
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   616,305
<SALES>                                        657,169
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               657,169
<CGS>                                          451,631
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  451,631
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               211,373
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,222
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,802)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       208
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,010)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.55)
        

</TABLE>