alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 233 

To withdraw certain Federal land and interests in that land from location, 

entry, and patent under the mining laws and disposition under the 

mineral and geothermal leasing laws. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 31, 2011 

Mr. BAUCUS (for himself and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To withdraw certain Federal land and interests in that land 

from location, entry, and patent under the mining laws 

and disposition under the mineral and geothermal leasing 

laws. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North Fork Watershed 

5 Protection Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 233 IS

1 (1) ELIGIBLE FEDERAL LAND.—The term ‘‘eli2 gible Federal land’’ means— 

3 (A) any federally owned land or interest in 

4 land depicted on the Map as within the North 

5 Fork Federal Lands Withdrawal Area; or 

6 (B) any land or interest in land located 

7 within the North Fork Federal Lands With8 drawal Area that is acquired by the Federal 

9 Government after the date of enactment of this 

10 Act. 

11 (2) MAP.—The term ‘‘Map’’ means the Bureau 

12 of Land Management map entitled ‘‘North Fork 

13 Federal Lands Withdrawal Area’’ and dated June 9, 

14 2010. 

15 SEC. 3. WITHDRAWAL. 

16 (a) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, 

17 the eligible Federal land is withdrawn from— 

18 (1) all forms of location, entry, and patent 

19 under the mining laws; and 

20 (2) disposition under all laws relating to min21 eral leasing and geothermal leasing. 

22 (b) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—Not later than 30 days 

23 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Map shall be 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 233 IS

1 made available to the public at each appropriate office of 

2 the Bureau of Land Management. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
# C_2015016EN.01001101.xml

| 19.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/11

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 October 2014 — Repsol YPF SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (trade marks and designs) (OHIM)

(Case C-466/13 P) (1)

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(1)(b) - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Figurative sign representing the letter ‘R’)

(2015/C 016/15)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellant: Repsol YPF SA (represented by: J.-B. Devaureix and L. Montoya Terán, abogados)

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (trade marks and designs) (OHIM) (J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Repsol YPF SA is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Repsol YPF SA is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 313, 26.10.2013.

---
exv10w1



 





Exhibit 10.1




AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.




Secretary’s Certificate




Amendment to

The AvalonBay Communities, Inc.

1994 Stock Incentive Plan

As Amended and Restated on December 8, 2004



On
September 19, 2007, at a duly called and held meeting of the Board of Directors of AvalonBay
Communities, Inc. (the “Company”) the Board adopted the following amendment to the AvalonBay
Communities, Inc. 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on December 8, 2004, and
further amended through December 6, 2006 (the “Plan”):




     Paragraph 6(b)(i) of the Plan is amended to read as follows to give effect to an increase in
the value of the number of shares granted to each Non-Employee Director annually (from $100,000 to
$125,000):




     “Each Non-Employee Director who is serving as a Director of the Company on
the fifth business day after each annual meeting of stockholders, beginning with
the 2008 Annual Meting of Stockholders, shall automatically be granted on such day
a number of shares of Restricted Stock equal to $125,000 based upon the closing
price of shares of the Company’s Common Stock as reported by the New York Stock
Exchange on such date (such number to be rounded to the nearest whole number).
Except as otherwise provided in the award agreement, such shares of Restricted
Stock shall vest twenty percent (20%) on the date of issuance and twenty percent
(20%) on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of issuance.”




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this certificate as of September 25, 2007.



	 	 	 
	 

	 	AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	/s/ Edward M. Schulman
	 

	 	 
	 

	 	Name: Edward M. Schulman
	 

	 	Title: Secretary
No. 96-5661.

#### Thomas *v.*Rogers, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.01





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of PDF Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2011 (the “Report”), I, John K. Kibarian, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ John K. KibarianJohn K. KibarianPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date: August 9, 2011
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Energy Field Services, LLC (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, W. H.
Easter III, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ W. H. Easter III
No. 48285.

#### Protests 872840-G, etc., of Kreusser & Schaad (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following Abstract 47291 the hats in question were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1), as claimed.
Before the First Division,

April 22, 1942

No. 47109.

#### Protests 996137-G, etc., of Eitinger Bead Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

The record established that the articles in question fall squarely within the definitions of beads as given by various dictionaries and confirms the statements that perforations in beads penetrate through the article and that they are not limited to number or location. It was stated that the scope of paragraph 1503 embraced beads of various sizes. *United States*v. *General Transport Co.*(22 C. C. P. A. 446, T. D. 47440), *United States*v. *Judae*(13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 164, T. D. 41024), and Abstract 36953 cited. Counsel conceded that the items in question are composed of imitation semiprecious stones. It was apparent from an examination of the samples, in question that they are not imitation pearl beads. No proof was offered to establish the component material of chief value of the articles. From the record the court was satisfied that the plaintiff has fairly established that the articles in question are more than semiprecious stones, and, in fact, that they are beads as claimed. However, it was not established that these beads are not specifically provided for elsewhere in paragraph 1503. *United States*v. *Albrecht*(27 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 71) cited. On the record presented the protests were overruled without affirming the action of the collector.
#### Larry BOTHUM, Relator, v. JOHN DEERE COMPANY and John Deere Insurance, Respondents.

No. C3-98-1436.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Oct. 28, 1998.

John J. Horvei, P.A., New Brighton, for Relator.

Louis R. Tilton, Jeffrey J. Lindquist, Pus-torino, Tilton & Parrington, P.A., Minneapolis, for Employer/Respndents.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed July 9, 1998, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. *See*Minnesota Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure 136.01, subdivision 1(b).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Edward C. Stringer

Edward C. Stringer Associate Justice
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alamosa Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kendall Cowan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




/s/ Kendall Cowan
-----------------------------------
Name:  Kendall Cowan
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  November 14, 2003



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Alamosa Holdings, Inc. and will be
retained by Alamosa Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 48891.

#### Protest 11574-K of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the hearing the collector’s letter and the records in Abstracts 40586 and 40480 were incorporated in the record herein. The merchandise in question was therefore held dutiable as follows: (1) Harmonicas at 40 percent under paragraph 1541, following Abstract 40586, and (2) certain whistles at 45 percent under paragraph 397, following Abstract 40480. Protest sustained to this extent, in accordance with stipulated facts.
Before the Second Division,

May 14, 1943

No. 48281.

#### Protests 79579-K, etc., of Butler Brothers (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was conclusively established that the wreaths in question are similar in all material respects to the electrically constructed Christmas wreaths the subject of *United States*v. *Minami*(29 C. C. P. A. 169, C. A. D. 188). They were therefore held dutiable as claimed at 35 percent under paragraph 353 as articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs.
#### Heir Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6584.

Entry No. 13001, etc.

Invoices dated Sutton in Ashfield, England,

December 29, 1941, etc.

Certified December 30, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 10, 1942, etc.

(Decided December 6, 1946)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge (Abstract):

These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined *465in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Ac.t of 1938 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

A written stipulation of fact, upon which the cases have been submitted, establishes that export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (d)) is the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutoiy values for the articles in question are the appraised values, less additions made on entry by the importers because of advances in similar cases.
# ORIGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE STATE
OF MONTANA DA 20-0396
and DA 20-0397 MONTANA DEMOCRATIC PARTY
and TAYLOR BLOSSOM, RYAN FILZ, MADELINE NEUMEYER,

and REBECCA WEED, individual electors,

Eg 

## AUG

1

1 

### 2020 Bowen Greenwood Clerk

of Supreme Court State

of Montana Plaintiffs

and Appellees, v.

ORDER STATE
OF MONTANA,

by and through

its SECRETARY

OF STATE, COREY STAPLETON, Defendant

and Appellant. Defendant

and Appellant Secretary

of State moves

to consolidate
these two appeals and to order
an expedited briefing schedule

in order

to have the appeals decided prior

to the August
20, 2020 deadline

for the Secretary

of State

to certify
for the November 2020 general election ballot the names and designations

of statewide candidates

to election administrators. Section 13-12-201(1), MCA. Both appeals

are taken frorn
an August

7, 2020 order
of the First Judicial District Court directing

the Secretary

of State
to strike from the general election ballot the narnes

of Montana Green Party candidates
who advanced after the June
2, 2020 primary election. Also

at issue are the unsuccessful intervention motions

of the Montana Republican Party, Lorrie Campbell,

and Jill Loven. Plaintiff
and Appellee

the Montana Dernocratic
Party opposes consolidation

of the two appeals
but agrees with the Secretary

of State's proposed expedited briefing schedule

in DA 20-0396
and indicates
that

it will comply with any briefing schedule

set by the Court. Having considered

the parties' submissions,

and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that the Motion

to Consolidate Appeals

is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED

that the request

for an expedited briefing schedule

is08/11/2020Case Number: DA 20-0397GRANTEDforbothDA20-0396andDA20-0397.Ineachcase,thepartiesshallfiletheirbriefsaccordingtothefollowingschedule:Appellant'sopeningbriefshallbefiledbyAugust12,2020.Appellees'responsebriefshallbefiledbyAugust17,2020.Appellant'sreplybriefshallbefiledbyAugust18,2020.ITISFURTHERORDEREDthatproposedintervenorstheMontanaRepublicanParty,LorrieCampbell,andJillLovenareGRANTEDleavetofileamicusbriefsinaccordancewithM.R.App.P.11(4)(a)and12(7).AnyamicusbriefsmustbefiledbyAugust12,2020.ITISFURTHERORDEREDthattheLewisandClarkCountyClerkofDistrictCourtisdirectedtotransrnittherecordimmediatelyuponreceiptofthisOrder.TheClerkofthisCourtisdirectedtofilethisOrderineachoftheabove-referencedcasesandtoprovideimmediatenoticeofitsentrytoallcounselofrecordandtotheLewisandClarkCountyClerkofDistrictCourt.DATEDthist(ayofAugust,2020.ChiefJustice2
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 96 (Friday, May 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28071-28072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9609]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated February 14, 2007 and published in the Federal 
Register on February 22, 2007, (72 FR 8017), Cambrex Charles City, 
Inc., 1205 11th Street, Charles City, Iowa 50616, made application by 
renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered 
as an importer of Phenylacetone (8501), a basic class of controlled 
substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to import Phenylacetone for use as a precursor in 
the manufacture of amphetamines only.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a) and determined that the 
registration of

[[Page 28072]]

Cambrex Charles City, Inc. to import the basic class of controlled 
substance is consistent with the public interest and with United States 
obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in 
effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated Cambrex 
Charles City, Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is 
consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included 
inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, 
verification of the company's compliance with State and local laws, and 
a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant 
to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, 
the above named company is granted registration as an importer of the 
basic class of controlled substance listed.

    Dated: May 14, 2007.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-9609 Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Polk Power Station 2-5 Conversion Project

Simple Cycle Units 2-5 Supplemental NO2 Dispersion Modeling Files

Directory No. of Files File

Name Name File Description

RECEPTOR 1 POLK_UNIT 2.ROU AERMOD Receptor File; Significant Impacts

Subtotal files 1

ANNUAL IMPACTS 5 SCFO_ANN_NO2SIL_YY.INP AERMOD Input File; Simple Cycle Annual NO2 SIL Anal

5 SCFO_ANN_NO2SIL_YY.OUT AERMOD Output File; Simple Cycle Annual NO2 SIL An

YY = 06 - 10

Subtotal files 10

1-HOUR NO2

SIL 1 SCFO_1HNO2SIL.INP AERMOD Input File; Simple Cycle 1-Hour NO2 SIL Analy

1 SCFO_1HNO2SIL.OUT AERMOD Output File; Simple Cycle 1-Hour NO2 SIL An

Cumulative 1 SC12_1HNO2SIL.INP AERMOD Input File; Simple Cycle 1-Hour NO2 Cumulati

1 SC12_1HNO2SIL.OUT AERMOD Output File; Simple Cycle 1-Hour NO2 Cumula

1 SC12_1HNO2SIL.MAX AERMOD Output File; Simple Cycle 1-Hour NO2 Cumula

Subtotal files 5

Total Files 16

Source: ECT, 2013.

Supp
No. 48923.

#### Protests 86094-K, etc., of F. W. Myers & Co., Inc. (Detroit).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the items consist of salted codfish similar in all material respects to that passed upon in Abstract 48574. That record was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith the claim at 1)4 cents per pound under paragraph 719 (3) and T. D. 49752 was sustained.
II 

Calendar No. 576 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2251 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 709 West 9th Street, 

Juneau, Alaska, as the ‘‘Robert Boochever United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2012 

Mr. BEGICH (for himself and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

DECEMBER 27, 2012 

Reported by Mrs. BOXER, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 709 

West 9th Street, Juneau, Alaska, as the ‘‘Robert 

Boochever United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ROBERT BOOCHEVER UNITED STATES COURT4 HOUSE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The United States courthouse 

6 located at 709 West 9th Street, Juneau, Alaska, shall be 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•S 2251 RS

1 known and designated as the ‘‘Robert Boochever United 

2 States Courthouse’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the United States courthouse referred to in sub6 section (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Rob7 ert Boochever United States Courthouse’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with 

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with 
Calendar No. 576 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2251 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse located 

‘‘Robert Boochever United States Courthouse’’. at 709 West 9th Street, Juneau, Alaska, as the 

DECEMBER 27, 2012 

Reported without amendment 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with
# C_2014315EN.01001501.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/15

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2014 — Kalliopi Nikolaou v Court of Auditors of the European Union

(Case C-220/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Non-contractual liability - Omissions on the part of the Court of Auditors - Claim for compensation for harm caused - Principle of the presumption of innocence - Principle of sincere cooperation - Powers - Conduct of preliminary investigations))

2014/C 315/21

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Kalliopi Nikolaou (represented by: V. Christianos and S. Paliou, dikigoroi)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Court of Auditors of the European Union (represented by: T. Kennedy and I. Ní Riagáin Düro, Agents, and P. Tridimas, Barrister)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2) | Orders Ms Kalliopi Nikolaou to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Ms Kalliopi Nikolaou to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 189, 29.6.2013.

1

---
# C_2013108EN.01001701.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Central Administrativo Norte (Portugal) lodged on 4 February 2013 — Marina da Conceição Pacheco Almeida v Fundo de Garantia Salarial, IP, Instituto da Segurança Social, IP

(Case C-57/13)

2013/C 108/35

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Central Administrativo Norte

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Marina da Conceição Pacheco Almeida

Appellant:

Respondent: Fundo de Garantia Salarial, IP, Instituto da Segurança Social, IP

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Is European Union law, in the specific context of a guarantee covering wage claims in the event of the employer’s insolvency, in particular Articles 4 and 10 of Directive 80/987/EEC, (1) to be interpreted as precluding a provision of national law which guarantees only claims falling due in the six months preceding the initiation of insolvency proceedings against the employer, even where the employee has brought an action against that employer before the Tribunal do Trabalho (Labour Court) with a view to obtaining a judicial determination of the amount outstanding and an enforcement order to recover those sums?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 80/987/EEC of 20 October 1980 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer. (OJ 1980 L 283 p. 23).

1

---