alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2007 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2007

  To amend the African Growth and Opportunity Act to extend the third-
   country fabric rule, to add South Sudan to the list of countries 
    eligible for designation under that Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 15, 2011

 Mr. Baucus (for himself, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Lugar, Mr. Wyden, 
  Mr. Blunt, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Brown of Massachusetts, Mr. Cardin, Mr. 
Isakson, Mr. Coons, and Mr. Thune) introduced the following bill; which 
        was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the African Growth and Opportunity Act to extend the third-
   country fabric rule, to add South Sudan to the list of countries 
    eligible for designation under that Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO THE AFRICAN GROWTH AND OPPORTUNITY ACT.

    (a) Extension of AGOA Third-Country Rule.--Section 112(c)(1) of the 
African Growth Opportunity Act (19 U.S.C. 3721(c)(1)) is amended by 
striking ``September 30, 2012'' each place it appears in the text and 
in the heading and inserting ``September 30, 2015''.
    (b) Designation of South Sudan.--Section 107 of the African Growth 
Opportunity Act (19 U.S.C. 3706) is amended by inserting ``Republic of 
South Sudan (South Sudan).'' after ``Republic of South Africa (South 
Africa).''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2013225EN.01005403.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/54

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 May 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Tivoli — Italy) — Francesco Fierro, Fabiana Marmorale v Edoardo Ronchi, Cosimo Scocozza

(Case C-106/13) (1)

1

(Request for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Implementation of European Union law - None - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

2013/C 225/101

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Tivoli

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Francesco Fierro, Fabiana Marmorale

Applicants:

Defendants: Edoardo Ronchi, Cosimo Scocozza

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale di Tivoli — Interpretation of Article 1 of Protocol No 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights, read in conjunction with Article 6 TEU and Articles 17 and 52(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Right to property — National legislation allowing local administrative authorities to prohibit an owner from selling a part of his building without prior authorisation

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to reply to the question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunale di Tivoli (Italy).

---

(1)  OJ C 141, 18.05.2013.

1

---
----

Form 10-KSB/A Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) 

I, Guangyu Wu, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, asadopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based upona review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31,2007 of the Registrant (the "Report"): 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Registrant. 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by theRegistrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request. 

SIGNATURE

Date: June 20, 2008 

/s/Guangyu Wu -------------------------- Guangyu Wu Chief Executive Officer 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 222 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 222

 To limit investor and homeowner losses in foreclosures, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 27, 2011

Mr. Whitehouse introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To limit investor and homeowner losses in foreclosures, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Limiting Investor and Homeowner Loss 
in Foreclosure Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. LOSS MITIGATION PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 105 of title 11, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Without limiting the court's authority under subsection (d) 
or under any other statute or rule, the court, by local rule or order, 
may establish and maintain a loss mitigation program for the 
consideration and negotiation of consensual alternatives to avoid 
foreclosure between an individual debtor and the holder of a claim 
secured by a security interest in real property that is the debtor's 
principal residence.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 362(e) of title 11, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(3) If the party in interest requesting relief from the stay 
under subsection (d) of this section participates in a loss mitigation 
program maintained pursuant to section 105(e) of this title, the time 
periods specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection shall be 
tolled during the time period commencing on the date on which such 
participation began and ending on the date on which notice of such 
termination is filed and served on the debtor.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Ella Dutton COLLINS v. C. Curtis & Vera MANN and The Prudential Louisiana Properties.

No. 98-C-2755.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 18, 1998.

IN RE: Collins, Ella Dutton; — Plaintiffs); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; Parish of Orleans Civil District Court Div. “F” Number 96-3056; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Number 97CA-2348.

Denied.

JOHNSON, J. would grant the writ.

VICTORY, J. not on panel.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 230 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 230

   To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prevent the 
                approval of genetically-engineered fish.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 31, 2011

Mr. Begich (for himself, Ms. Murkowski, and Mrs. Murray) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prevent the 
                approval of genetically-engineered fish.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PREVENTING THE APPROVAL OF GENETICALLY-ENGINEERED FISH.

    Section 512(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
U.S.C. 360b(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(7) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, 
        a genetically-engineered fish shall be deemed unsafe under this 
        section, including for purposes of section 402(a)(2)(C)(ii).''.
                                 <all>
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Department of Defense heads of Supply and Logistics visit DLA Distribution  Sigonella, Italy

By Dawn Bonsell, DLA Distribution Public Affairs

                NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa.  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA Distribution SigonellaItalyDLADLA DistributionNaval Air StationSigonellaDepartment of Defense
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           64360
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 64360
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   64360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            17591
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       46769
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     64360
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 89292
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 45891
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  43401
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              43401
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     43401
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    11.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.50
        

</TABLE>
#### Darryl TOLBERT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James H. GOMEZ, Director; William Duncan, Warden; Attorney General Of The State Of California, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 97-55004.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 12, 1998.

Before: HUG, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en bane court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.
NO. SEMS ID DATE AUTHOR RECIPIENT TITLE/DESCRIPTION PAGES

1 88435 3/31/88 U.S. EPA File Administrative Record for the Eau Claire Municipal Well Field Site - Remedial Action - Original ( Documents on this index are incorporated by reference into the Deletion Docket) 23

2 88416 12/14/90 U.S. EPA File Administrative Record for the Eau Claire Municipal Well Field Site - Removal Action - Original ( Documents on this index are incorporated by reference into the Deletion Docket) 2

3 347970 12/23/09 U.S. EPA File Administrative Record for the Eau Claire Municipal Well Field Site - Remedial Action - Update 1 (Documents on this index are incorporated by reference into the Deletion Docket) 1

4 437158 7/17/12 U.S. EPA File Administrative Record for the Eau Claire Municipal Well Field Site - Remedial Action - Update 2 (Documents on this index are incorporated by reference into the Deletion Docket) 1

5 452431 4/5/2013 Karl, R., U.S. EPA File Final Close Out Report for the Eau Claire Municipal Well Field Site 94 

## Eau Claire Municipal Well Field Site U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Remedial Action

Deletion Docket For


## Eau Claire, Chippewa County, Wisconsin

August 7, 2013 SEMS ID: 906397

### Eau Claire Municipal Well Field Deletion Docket Page 2

NO. SEMS ID DATE AUTHOR RECIPIENT TITLE/DESCRIPTION PAGES

6 446563 6/14/13 Stepp, C., WDNR Hedman, S.,

U.S. EPA Wisconsin Department of

Natural Resources Concurrence for Eau Claire Municipal Well Field Proposed NPL Deletion 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Davidson
Diversified Real Estate I 1998 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000721673
<NAME> DAVIDSON DIVERSIFIED REAL ESTATE I, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             338
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          13,838
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,216
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         10,367
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,938)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,260
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,035
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,219
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 832
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (184)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (232.84)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas M. Sheppard, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this interim report on Form 10-QSB of FirstBingo.com;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this interim report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; and

3.   ; Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this interim report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this interim report.

4.   The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and

6.   The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 13th day of November, 2003.



| | /s/ Thomas M. Sheppard
Thomas M. Sheppard 
Secretary, Principal Executive Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---
#### COMLY v. GOLDSMITH.

September 11, 1837.

*Rule to show cause of*action, *and why defendant should not he discharged on common bail.*

An affidavit that defendant is justly and truly indebted to the plaintiff, in a sum of money, without stating the contract, or the nature of the indebtedness, is not sufficient to hold to bail.

*CAPIAS ad respondendum*to September term, 1837, No. 455. Plaintiff’s affidavit, on this rule to show cause, was in the following words, víz:

“ Samuel Comly, the plaintiff, being duly affirmed, doth depose and say, that Samuel Goldsmith is indebted to him in the sum of 9379 dollars and 81 cents; deponent further saith, that said Samuel Goldsmith is a seafaring man; that he has just returned from a voyage in which he has been absent from the United States for many months; that to the best of deponent’s knowledge and belief, said defendant intends to quit this commonwealth, and will depart the jurisdiction of this court, unless held to bail, without leaving sufficient real or personal estate therein to satisfy the demand in this action.”

*Heiskell,*for rule.

*Brashears,*contra.

Per Curiam.—

This affidavit is altogether insufficient. The nature of the indebtedness is not stated, or the contract or transaction on which it is founded.

Rule absolute.a

a

*Vide*Kelly v. Kintzing; Benedict *v.*Whartenby; McCanles *v.*Frederickson and Young *v.*Corder, in this volume, and the index.
#### L. H. Wiggin *et ux.*v. F. P. Dickson.

No. 15,567.

Error from Shawnee district court; Alston W. Dana, judge.

Opinion filed May 8, 1909.

Affirmed.

*E. R. Simon,*and *W. H. Holmes,*for the plaintiffs in •error.

*L. H. Greenwood,*for the defendant in error.

*Per Ctiriam:*

The proceedings were not brought to this court in time to review the alleged error in refusing to discharge the attachment. There was no reversible error in sustaining the objection to the question asked as to the agreement concerning the amount remaining due on the chattel mortgage. It is apparent from all the evidence that defendants were relying, not upon a subsequent agreement, but upon an understanding which they claimed to have had at the time the written instrument was executed, to the effect that the mortgagee would make some reduction on the rent. Besides, the defense pleaded was payment, not a subsequent agreement. The jury could not have been misled by the instruction that the cause of action on the note was admitted, which only meant that the execution of the note was admitted. The other instructions fairly stated the issues. We .find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
## Design Line 7 (98.00%) Design Line 8 (98.60%)

65-80% 15-25% 5-10%

98.12%

to

98.46% 98.64%

to

98.77%

55-65% 30-35% 5-10% 99.02%

to

99.11%

98.60%

to

98.65%

98.63%

to

98.72% 

## • Mix Data for DL7 and DL8

• Published efficiency levels for products from each section

Purchased on Low Cost (Aluminum or Copper, Shielded)

Add other feature (Low Temperature Rise, sound level, K

- rated, Harmonic Mitigating, etc...)

NEMA PREMIUM, CSL3, CEE Tier 1 98.00%

to

98.12%