alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|    |                                                                                                                                |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Amtech Systems, Inc. (the “registrant”); |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|          |
|----------|
|          |  |  |  |
| By  | /s/ Bradley C. Anderson |   |
|     | Bradley C. Anderson |   |
|     | Executive Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
|     | Amtech Systems, Inc. |   |
|     | Date: | December 9, 2014 |   |
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
Dr. Gary S. Marrone, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of PrimePlayer Incorporated (the"Company"), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section1350, that:
	The Quarterly Report of Form 10QSB of the Company for the quarterly period endingSeptember 30, 2002 (The "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and
	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Dated: November 14, 2002
						By:/s/ Dr. Gary S. Marrone
							Dr. Gary S. Marrone
							Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
Exhibit 10.6


 


Schedule of Cross-Collateralized Agreements
and Promissory Notes


 


	
  Property

  	
   

  	
  Owner

  	
   

  	
  Note and Cross-

  Collateralization

  Amount

  	
   

  
	
  Archstone Vanoni Ranch (fee and leasehold)

  	
   

  	
  ASN Vanoni Ranch LLC and Tishman Speyer Archstone-Smith Vanoni Ranch
  Lessee, L.L.C.

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  69,149,000

  	
   

  
	
  Archstone Warner Center

  	
   

  	
  ASN Warner Center LLC

  	
   

  	
  110,405,000

  	
   

  
	
  Archstone City Place

  	
   

  	
  ASN City Place LLC

  	
   

  	
  48,428,000

  	
   

  
	
  Archstone Fox Plaza

  	
   

  	
  ASN Fox Plaza LLC

  	
   

  	
  61,634,500

  	
   

  
	
  Archstone Boston Common

  	
   

  	
  ASN Park Essex LLC

  	
   

  	
  152,926,000

  	
   

  
	
  Archstone Redmond Campus

  	
   

  	
  Tishman Speyer Archstone-Smith Redmond Campus, L.L.C.

  	
   

  	
  72,358,000

  	
   

  
	
  Archstone Harbour Pointe

  	
   

  	
  Tishman Speyer Archstone-Smith Harbour Pointe, L.L.C.

  	
   

  	
  27,625,000

  	
   

  
	
  Archstone Northcreek

  	
   

  	
  Tishman Speyer Archstone-Smith Northcreek, L.L.C.

  	
   

  	
  62,603,000

  	
   

  
	
  Archstone Redmond Court

  	
   

  	
  Tishman Speyer Archstone-Smith Redmond Court, L.L.C.

  	
   

  	
  23,100,000

  	
   

  
	
  Archstone Belltown

  	
   

  	
  ASN Belltown LLC

  	
   

  	
  54,410,000

  	
   

  
	
  Archstone Redmond Park

  	
   

  	
  ASN Redmond Park LLC

  	
   

  	
  41,063,000

  	
   

  
	
  Archstone Thousand Oaks Crest

  	
   

  	
  ASN Thousand Oaks Crest LLC

  	
   

  	
  33,140,000

  	
   

  
	
  The Flats at Dupont Circle

  	
   

  	
  ASN Dupont Circle LLC

  	
   

  	
  90,066,000
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JORGE PARADA-QUINTANILLA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-71883

Agency No. A096-226-527

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

San Francisco, California

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Jorge Parada-Quintanilla, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se

for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his

appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

FILED

JUN 03 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-71883

We reject petitioner’s claim that he is eligible for asylum based on his

membership in a particular social group, namely, young El Salvadoran males who

resist efforts by gangs to recruit them. See Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d

738, 745-46 (9th Cir. 2008) ( rejecting as a particular social group”young men in

El Salvador resisting gang violence”); Ramos-Lopez v. Holder, 563 F.3d 855, 860-

62 (9th Cir. 2009) (rejecting as a particular social group “young Honduran men

who have been recruited by a [gang], but who refuse to join”). Because petitioner

failed to demonstrate he was persecuted on account of a protected ground, we deny

the petition as to his asylum and withholding of removal claims. See Barrios v.

Holder, 581 F.3d 849, 856 (9th Cir. 2009). We also reject petitioner’s claim that

the IJ failed to properly consider his CAT claim because the BIA did consider the

claim de novo, and denied the CAT claim.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
# C_2013171EN.01004103.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/41

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 9.4.2013 — de Brito Sequeira Carvalho v Commission

(Case F-126/12) (1)

1

2013/C 171/86

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 71, 9.3.2013, p. 29.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Non-Invasive Monitoring Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended July 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), we, Allan F. Brack, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David Genzler, Principal financial and accounting officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  | 
|---------------- |  | 
|October 30, 2003 |  | 
|                 |  | 
|                 |  | 
|                 |  | 



|                 |  | 
|---------------- |  | 
|October 30, 2003 |  | 
|                 |  | 
|                 |  | 
|                 |  |
##### 



Exhibit 32.3 AMERICAN BANCORP, INC. DISCLOSURE OF APPROVAL BY THE COMPANYS
AUDIT COMMITTEE FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF
NONAUDIT SERVICES BY THE COMPANYS
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
202 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  For 2003, the Audit Committee of American Bancorp, Inc. approved that its
independent auditors could review the Companys SEC Forms 10-K and 10-Q,
prepare the Companys income tax returns, conduct a review of investment
practices, perform retirement plan testing and reporting, amend the Companys
section 125 cafeteria plan document, review and analyze executive deferred
compensation and life insurance plans and provide answers to miscellaneous
inquires by management and provide advice to management and the Board of
Directors of the Company and the Bank. - 32 -
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-10371

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JIMMY EARL WHITE, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:02-CR-304-ALL-D

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

 Counsel appointed to represent Jimmy Earl White, Jr., has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). White has not filed a

response.

 Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issues in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and counsel is excused from
No. 03-10371

-2-

further responsibilities herein. The appeal is DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                        SUNRISE MEDICAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                           
                                 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                                           

 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name of Subsidiary                               Incorporation        Ownership %
------------------                               -------------        -----------
<S>                                              <C>                  <C>        
Sunrise Medical CCG Inc.                         Wisconsin                    100
Sunrise Medical HHG Inc.                         California                   100
  Homecare (Deutschland) GmbH                    Germany                      100
     DeVilbiss Medizinische Produkte GmbH        Germany                      100
     DeVilbiss Health Care (Europa) GmbH         Germany                      100
SunMed Finance Inc.                              Delaware                     100
Sunrise Medical Canada Inc.                      Canada                       100
Sunrise Medical Holdings B.V.                    Netherlands                  100
  Norsk Rehab AS                                 Norway                       100
  Sopur Medizintechnik GmbH                      Germany                      100
  Sunrise Medical B.V.                           Netherlands                  100
  Sunrise Medical S.A.                           France                       100
     DeVilbiss Medical France S.A.               France                       100
     SCI La Planche S.A.                         France                       100
  Talleres Uribarri S.L.                         Spain                        100
  Sunrise Medical S.r.l.                         Italy                        100
Sunrise Medical Ltd.                             United Kingdom               100
  Coopers Healthcare PLC                         United Kingdom               100
Sunrise Medical A.G.                             Switzerland                  100
Vitactiv AB                                      Sweden                       100
Sunrise Medical Pty Ltd.                         Australia                    100
Sunrise Medical Technologias S.A. de C.V.        Mexico                       100
</TABLE>


----------------------

Each corporation is the parent of those indented beneath it.

The company has omitted from the list sixteen foreign and four domestic
subsidiaries.  None of the omitted companies individually or in the aggregate is
a significant subsidiary.
No. 43303.

#### Protest 9489-K of Strauss-Eckardt Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of harmonicas like those involved in Abstract 40586. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 1541 was therefore sustained.
Before the First Division,

October 30, 1941

No. 46514.

#### Protests 768965-G, etc., of Abad Esteve Corp. et al. (New York).

*307Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 44399.

#### Protests 806580-G/84591, etc., of Chinese Trading Co. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On the authority of *Lamborn*v. *United States*(27 C. C. P. A. 46, C. A. D. 60) the protests were dismissed.
# C_2013147EN.01001202.xml

| 25.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/12

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 11 March 2013 — Theodora Hendrika Bouman v Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen

(Case C-114/13)

2013/C 147/22

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Arbeidshof te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Theodora Hendrika Bouman

Appellant:

Respondent: Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the part of the AOW benefit which is paid to a Netherlands resident and which is based on an insurance period during which that Netherlands resident, simply by making an application, may refrain from joining the Netherlands scheme and thus from paying the premium, and in fact did so for a limited period, to be regarded as a benefit which is awarded on the basis of a voluntary or optional continued insurance within the meaning of Article 46a(3)(c) of Regulation 1408/71, (1) so that no account may be taken of it when applying the provision against overlapping as laid down in Article 52(1)(1) of the Belgian Koninklijk Besluit van 21 december 1967 tot vaststelling van het algemeen reglement betreffende het rust- en overlevingspensioen voor werknemers.

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community (OJ 1971 L 149, p. 2).

1

---
| (1) | The      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      December 23, 2008 | By:   | /s/      Qinan Ji       |
|-------------------------------|-----------------|------------------------------|
|                          |            |                         |
|                          |            |                         |
|                          |            | Chief      Executive Officer |

----
No. 39257.

#### Protest 797688-G of Wo Kee & Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *Great Pacific Co.*(23 C. C. P. A. 319, T. D. 48192) the broken kernels of the milled rice in question were held dutiable at five-eighths of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 727 as claimed.
No. 48233.

#### Protest 89516-K of Automatic Totalisators, Inc. (Tampa).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 42193.

#### Protest 913766-G of Arthur N. Cook.

Abstract 41722. Application by plaintiff for rehearing granted.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00440-CV

Irving Q. Hurdle, Jr., Appellant

v.

Frederich J. Bingham, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY 

NO. C-1-CV-11-000678, HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Irving Q. Hurdle, Jr. no longer wishes to pursue this appeal and has filed a motion to

dismiss. Hurdle’s counsel states that he has conferred with counsel for Frederich J. Bingham, who does

not oppose this motion. We grant Hurdle’s motion and dismiss the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

____________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Rose and Goodwin

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: December 16, 2011
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Europe & Africa celebrates Air Force's 73rd birthday

By Michael TuttleDLA Troop Support Europe & Africa

                KAISERSLAUTERN, Germany  –              
Service members and civilians with the Defense Logistics Agency Europe & Africa celebrated the Air Force’s 73rd birthday Sept. 18. On this date in 1947, the Air Force was separated from the Army and established as its own branch of service.

 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Air Force birthdayDLA Europe & AfricaKleber KasernePeople & Culture
No. 40539.

#### Protest 692318-G of Halle Bros. Co. (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Outerwear in chief value of wool similar to that involved in *United States*v. *International Clearing House*(24 C. C. P. A. 117, T. D. 48416) was held dutiable at 50 cents per pound and 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1114 as claimed.
No. 96-6072.

#### Mihaly *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
(Reap. Dec. 9932)

#### Yale Sales Company *v.*United States

Entry No. 14226, etc.

(Decided March 1, 1961)

*Lawrence & Tuttle {Edward N. Glad*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*William S. Orriek, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General *(Richard E. FitzGibbon,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

JOHNSON, Judge:

When this appeal for reappraisement was called for trial, it was submitted upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> Me. Glad: If it please the Court, this appeal is abandoned except as to entries number 7411 and 10911. As to these two entries the appeals are abandoned except as to items number 150 B and C, and item number 217/Z1.

> Me. EitzGebbon : I haven’t got a “1” after the “Z.”

> Mk. Glad : As to these two items, I offer to stipulate that the export value, as defined under Section 402, for such or similar merchandise, so far as item number 150 B and C are concerned, is 90 cents, less 40 per cent, net packed.

> Me. FitzGibbon : That is agreed.

> MR. Glad: And that the export value defined by Section 402 as to item number 217/Z1 is $75.30, rather, Deutsche marks 75.30, less 33% per cent, net packed.

> Me. EitzGibbon : .That is agreed.

> Me. Glad : I offer to stipulate there was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise during the period of exportation.

> Me. EitzGibbon : That is agreed.

Said stipulation was later amended to read:

> Me. Glad : If it please the Court, I ask that the submission of pencil number 213 be set aside in order to amend my stipulation with regard to item number 217/Z1 in Entry Number 10911.

> *615Judge Johnson 5 Without objection, submission set aside.

> Mr. Glad 5 Your Honor will recall I offered to stipulate that the export value was Deutsche marks 75.30.

> At this time I offer to stipulate that in fact the export value of this particular item was $75.30, less 33% per cent, net packed.

> Mr. FitzGibbon: That is agreed.

On the agreed facts, I find that the export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise described on the invoices covered by entry No. 7411 and entry No. 10911 as items numbered 150 B, 150 O, and 217/Z1, and that such values are 90 cents each, less 40 per centum, net packed, for the items numbered 150 B and 150 C, and $75.30, less 33% per centum, net packed, for item numbered 217/Zl.

As to all other entries and all other items of merchandise, the appeal, having been abandoned, is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2014261EN.01002004.xml

| 11.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/20

---

Order of the President of the Court of 13 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hannover — Germany) — Wilhelm Spitzner, Maria-Luise Spitzner v TUIfly GmbH

(Case C-658/13) (1)

1

2014/C 261/39

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 85, 22.3.2014.

1

---