alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
***EXHIBIT 32***

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANICAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the report on Form 10-KSB of ComCam, Inc. for the annual period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, Don Gilbreath, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of the registrant for the period covered by this Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ Don Gilbreath

Don Gilbreath 

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 14, 2008

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

 

28
Before the Third Division,

June 3, 1952

No. 56736.

protests 178103-K (A) and 178103-K (B) (New York).

#### Nanking Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currency involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currency of the invoices should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.
No. 44338.

#### Protests 29304-K, etc., of J. S. Hoffman Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Stokby*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358) it was held that the merchandise is properly dutiable at 3)4 cents per pound under paragraph 703, Tariff Act of 1930, on the basis of the net weight of the contents of the cans less 10 percent allowance for the gelatinous material.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 18, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Isuzu on June 23, 2011

FROM: Don Kopinski

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on June 23, 2011 between Isuzu and EPA staff. 

The following people attended:

Isuzu: Jeff Marsee, Takahiro Koseki, Steve Yarrow

EPA: Byron Bunker, Chris Nevers, Chuck Moulis, Tony Fernandez, and Don Kopinski

The discussion focused on Nissan’s plans for HD incomplete vehicles and how the EPA/NHTSA 

HD GHG and fuel consumption program will affect them. Isuzu representatives explained that, 

for some of their heavy-duty incomplete vehicles, they face unusual circumstances in that these 

vehicles are sold in a variety of configurations, but Isuzu does not sell a corresponding complete 

vehicle that could serve as a sister vehicle under the HD GHG rule sister vehicle concept. 

Discussion focused on creating an equivalent regulatory framework to that envisioned under the 

original sister vehicle concept, whereby a manufacturer could choose one of the incomplete 

vehicle configurations it produces, and use it to create a complete vehicle solely for the purpose 

of testing (or use a customer’s completed vehicle for this purpose).
(Reap. Dec. 9691)

#### Harper, Robinson & Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. CE 6148.

(Decided May 3, 1960)

*Lawrence é Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain binoculars and cases exported from Japan and entered at the port of San Francisco.

Stipulated facts, upon which the case has been submitted, establish that the proper basis of appraisement of the involved merchandise is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory values were the following unit price, plus the proportionate cost of packing, as invoiced:

> Item Binoculars Case

> 7 *x*35 coated $11.72 $2

The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent, the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                         27,721
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  36,637
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    18,451
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               82,809
<PP&E>                                         115,718
<DEPRECIATION>                                 99,570
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 441,423
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          177,734
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    62,148
<COMMON>                                       215,148
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   441,423
<SALES>                                        211,292
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               691,773
<CGS>                                          38,050
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  731,082
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (35,105)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (35,105)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (35,105)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.002)



</TABLE>
# C_2015056EN.01001002.xml

| 16.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/10

---

Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 11 November 2014 — European Commission v Romania

(Case C-406/13) (1)

1

(2015/C 056/13)

Language of the case: Romanian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.

1

---
Date: ~~ II /1 1 /::lo!'-/ t(t 1/ .Ui)fhv'l 

Meeting: 'rYJ-e~~ IJ.L-fYl ivJ e .S) 'CJOU{... C&L0 

R ule(s) Discussed: Te.,t.Q 5 r<.-g L6Yl~ h a~<:­

Written Materials? Yes/No 

Name Organization 

--S:~{'a.Y'\ ~h~ ~ ~ ie..-rrq C0vb 

l-o IIJ ~ crz. VJ.. "f-tv I • 

tJJ o~ Jkvryvv.s - ll---

?~e-e-N ~ ~CA c~ 

P~ :V..:...v( t::r?A o.~ 

\(~Q~ e:trR 

~'-~ \ --~:~.. ...... , o.q-G r<:. 

n:lc- (~e~...- (yi)Qf'S. 

~"2. ·. (l...-..Q Q ....... ., ,-,.,A ~ ... =- v't 

_) 6 

d(( , -y "" ~~CU."-~.>-\)\ 0 

Phone Number 

( G so-) g b2 - g 7/ o, 

(6 ~ -;)o () 'L-1 'u 

'5v l - 7 Oj. - <;; (/ i-C 

Iff~ 9?7 5& WJ
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 98-40228 Summary Calendar

_____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RUSSELL LYNELL EVANS, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1-97-CR-92-1

_________________________________________________________________ October 6, 1998 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Russell Lynell Evans has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities h erein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5 T H C IR . R. 42.2.
D I S M I S S E D.2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17-1888V

Filed: April 12, 2019

UNPUBLISHED

CHARLES PRESLEY,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for 

petitioner.

Robert Paul Coleman, III, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On December 6, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2

(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”)

caused-in-fact by the influenza vaccination he received on December 15, 2016. Petition 

at 1, ¶ 1, 5. Petitioner further alleges that he received the vaccination in the United 

States, suffered the residual effects of his injury for more than six months, and that 

neither he nor any other party has filed a civil action or received compensation for his

injury, alleged as vaccine caused. Id. at ¶¶ 1, 5, 6. The case was assigned to the 

Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
On April 8, 2019, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that 

petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. 

Specifically, he indicates “it is respondent’s position that petitioner has satisfied the 

criteria set forth in the revised Vaccine Injury Table (“Table”) and the Qualifications and 

Aids to Interpretation (“QAI”).” Id. at 3. Respondent further agrees that “based on the 

current record, petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the 

Act arising from his GBS.” Id.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATION     I, Andrew P. Calerich, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,2005 of American Oil & Gas, Inc.     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.      Date: November 15, 2005  /s/ Andrew P. Calerich     Andrew P. Calerich  Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit      32**

**Statement      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section      906      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|   | 1. | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or                15(d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of the dates and for the periods covered by the                Report. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  June                14, 2007 | /s/                Richard B. Collins                                              |
|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                          | Richard                B. Collins                                                  |
|                                          | Chief                Executive Officer and President                               |
|                                          |                                                                               |
|                                          |                                                                               |
|                                          |                                                                               |
| Date:  June                14, 2007 | /s/                Mark A. Roberts                                                 |
|                                          | Mark                A. Roberts                                                     |
|                                          | Executive                Vice President and Chief Financial                Officer |
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Emageon Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ W. Randall PittmanW. Randall PittmanChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)