### 44680 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

within a 4.6-mile radius of Hartford-Brainard Airport from the Hartford-Brainard Airport
158 ° bearing clockwise to the HartfordBrainard Airport 052 ° bearing, and within a 6-mile radius of the Hartford-Brainard Airport from the Hartford-Brainard Airport
052 ° bearing clockwise to the 158 ° bearing. This Class D airspace area is effective during specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be continuously published in the Airport/Facility Directory
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.
* * * * *

ANE CT E5 Hartford, CT [Amended] Hartford-Brainard Airport, CT

(Lat. 41 °44′12′′ N., long. 72 ° 38′58′′ W.) That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within an 11.5-mile radius of Hartford-Brainard Airport.

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on July 24,
2014. Myron A. Jenkins, Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2014–18067 Filed 7–31–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE**

**Bureau of Industry and Security**

**15 CFR Part 744**

**[Docket No. 140627545–4617–01]**

**RIN 0694–AG22**

**Addition of Certain Persons to the Entity List** 

**AGENCY :**  Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This rule amends the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by adding sixteen persons under nineteen entries to the Entity List. The persons who are added to the Entity List have been determined by the U.S. Government to be acting contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States. These persons will be listed on the Entity List under the destinations of Afghanistan, China, Hong Kong, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates (U.A.E.). There are nineteen entries for sixteen persons because three persons are listed under multiple destinations, resulting in three additional entries: one person in the U.A.E. has an address in Iran and two persons in China each have one address in Hong Kong.

**DATES :**  This rule is effective August 1,
2014. **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Chair, End-User Review Committee, Office of the Assistant Secretary, Export Administration, Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of Commerce, Phone: (202) 482–5991, Fax: (202) 482– 3911, Email: ERC@bis.doc.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Background

The Entity List (Supplement No. 4 to Part 744) notifies the public about entities that have engaged in activities that could result in increased risk of diversion of exported, reexported or transferred (in-country) items to weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs. Since its initial publication, grounds for inclusion on the Entity List have expanded to include activities sanctioned by the State Department and activities contrary to U.S. national security or foreign policy interests. Certain exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) to entities on the Entity List require licenses from BIS. License applications are reviewed with a presumption of denial. The availability of license exceptions for exports, reexports on transfers (in-country) is very limited. The license review policy for each entity is identified in the license review policy column on the Entity List. The availability of license exceptions is noted in the Federal Register notices adding persons to the Entity List. BIS places entities on the Entity List based on certain sections of part 744 (Control Policy: End-User and End-Use Based) of the EAR.

The End-user Review Committee (ERC), composed of representatives of the Departments of Commerce (Chair), State, Defense, Energy and, where appropriate, the Treasury, makes all decisions regarding additions to, removals from, or other modifications to the Entity List. The ERC makes all decisions to add an entry to the Entity List by majority vote and all decisions to remove or modify an entry by unanimous vote.
ERC Entity List Decisions Additions to the Entity List

This rule implements the decision of the ERC to add sixteen persons under nineteen entries to the Entity List on the basis of § 744.11 (License requirements that apply to entities acting contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States) of the EAR. The nineteen entries added to the Entity List consist of five entries in Afghanistan, seven entries in China, two entries in Hong Kong, one entry in Iran, and four entries in the U.A.E. The ERC reviewed § 744.11(b) (Criteria for revising the Entity List) in making the determination to add these sixteen persons to the Entity List. Under that paragraph, entities for whom there is reasonable cause to believe, based on specific and articulable facts, have been involved, are involved, or pose a significant risk of being or becoming involved, in activities that are contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States, and those acting on behalf of such persons may be added to the Entity List. Paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(5) of § 744.11 include an illustrative list of activities that could be contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States.

The ERC determined to add four persons—FIMCO FZE, Crescent International Trade and Services FZE, Khosrow Kasraei, and Mujhid Ali– to the Entity List under five entries under the destinations of Iran and the U.A.E. on the basis of their involvement in activities contrary to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, under § 744.11(b)(2). These companies and their affiliates have been engaging in conduct that poses a risk of violating the EAR, specifically with regard to the attempted illicit reexport of U.S.-origin items to Iran, under § 744.11(b)(2). These four persons were involved in the attempted export of a lathe machine subject to the EAR to Iran in violation of Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control regulations and the EAR. Lathe machines are used in the production of high grade steel or ‘‘bright steel’’, which in turn may be used, among other things, in the manufacture of automobile and aircraft parts.

The ERC determined to add five persons—Emal Bilal Construction Company, Wahab Karwan Construction Company, Mohammad Jan Khan Mangal, Shan Mahmoud Khan Mangal, and Emal Bilal Mangal—to the Entity List under the destination of Afghanistan for involvement in activities contrary to the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States, specifically the activities described under paragraph (b)(1) (Supporting persons engaged in acts of terror) of § 744.11 of the EAR. These persons have engaged in activities in support of persons designated by the Secretary of State as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO). The persons designated as FTOs were so designated as a result of their activities against U.S. and coalition forces in Afghanistan contrary to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.


### 44681 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

The ERC determined to add four persons—Beijing Aeronautics Yangpu Technology Investment Company (BAYTIC), Chengdu GaStone Technology Co. Ltd. (CGTC), China Electronics Technology Group Corporation 29 (CETC 29) Research Institute, and Jiangsu Leidian Technology Company (JLTC)—to the Entity List under the destination of China on the basis of their involvement in activities contrary to the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States. Specifically, the ERC determined that these persons have been involved in the activities described under paragraph § 744.11(b)(5) of the EAR. Paragraph (b)(5) specifies that the types of activities that could be contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States include engaging in conduct that poses a risk of violating the EAR when such conduct raises sufficient concern that the ERC believes that prior review of exports, reexports, or transfers (in-country) involving the party and the possible imposition of license conditions or license denial enhances BIS’s ability prevent violations of the EAR. The ERC has reasonable cause to believe that BAYTIC, CGTC, CETC 29 Research Institute and JLTC, have been involved in the illicit procurement of commodities and technologies for unauthorized military end use in China.

The ERC also determined to add one person located in China—Qing’an International Trading Group (QTC)—to the Entity List on the basis of its involvement in activities contrary to the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States. Specifically, the ERC determined that this person has been involved in the activities described under paragraph § 744.11(b)(5) of the EAR. The ERC has reasonable cause to believe that Qing’an International Trading Group has been involved in the illicit procurement of commodities and technologies for unauthorized military end use in China.

Finally, the ERC determined that PRC Lode Technology Company and Su Bin, both located in both China and Hong Kong, should be added to the Entity List on the basis of their involvement in activities contrary to the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States. Specifically, the ERC determined that these two persons have been involved in the activities described under paragraph § 744.11(b)(5) of the EAR. The ERC has reasonable cause to believe that PRC Lode Technology Company and Su Bin have been involved in the unauthorized exploitation of computer systems of U.S. companies and Department of Defense contractors to illicitly obtain and export information, including controlled technology related to military projects, contrary to U.S. law.

For the sixteen persons recommended for addition, the ERC specified a license requirement for all items subject to the EAR and a license review policy of presumption of denial. The license requirements apply to any transaction in which items are to be exported, reexported, or transferred (in-country) to any of the persons or in which such persons act as purchaser, intermediateconsignee, ultimate consignee, or enduser. In addition, no license exceptions are available for exports, reexports, or transfers (in-country) to the persons being added to the Entity List in this rule.

This final rule adds the following sixteen persons under nineteen entries to the Entity List: Afghanistan

(1) Emal Bilal Construction Company (EBCC), a.k.a., the following two aliases:
—Imal Bilal Road Construction

Company; and —Aimal and Balal Company. Kolola Pushta, Charahi Gul-e-Surkh,

Kabul, Afghanistan; and Maidan Sahr, Hetefaq Market, Paktiya,

Afghanistan; (2) Emal Bilal Mangal, a.k.a., the following three aliases: —Imal Bilal; and —Aimal Balal; and —Bellal Mangal. Kolola Pushta, Charahi Gul-e-Surkh,

Kabul, Afghanistan; and Maidan Sahr, Hetefaq Market, Paktiya,

Afghanistan;
(3) Mohammad Jan Khan Mangal Kolola Pushta, Charahi Gul-e-Surkh,

Kabul, Afghanistan; and Maidan Sahr, Hetefaq Market, Paktiya,

Afghanistan;
(4) Shan Mahmoud Khan Mangal Kolola Pushta, Charahi Gul-e-Surkh,

Kabul, Afghanistan; and Maidan Sahr, Hetefaq Market, Paktiya,

Afghanistan;
(5) Wahab Karwan Construction Company (WKCC) Qabel Boy, Jalalabad Road, District 9,

Kabul, Afghanistan.

China

(1) Beijing Aeronautics Yangpu Technology Investment Company (BAYTIC), a.k.a., the following three aliases: —Beijing Aerospace Yangpu

Technology Investment Company; and —Tian Hang Yang Pu Technology Investment Limited Company; and —Bei Jing Tian Hang Yang Pu

Technology Investment Limited Company. No. 27 Xiaoyun Road, Chaoyang

District, Beijing 100027, China; and Room 3120, Building 1, 16 Zhufang

Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China; (2) Chengdu GaStone Technology Co., Ltd. (CGTC), 31F, A Tower, Yanlord Square, No. 1,

Section 2, Renmind South Road, Chengdu, China; (3) China Electronics Technology Group Corporation 29 (CETC 29) Research Institute, a.k.a., the following two aliases: —CETC 29th Research Institute; and —China Southwest Electronic

Equipment Research Institute (SWIEE). No. 496 West Yingkang Road, Chengdu,

Sichuan Province 610036, China; and Box #429, #1 Waixichadianziheng

Street, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610036, China; (4) Jiangsu Leidian Technology Company (JLTC), 88 Luyuan Road, Yixing Environmental

Sciences Park, Jiangsu Province, China; (5) PRC Lode Technology Company, Room 8306 Kelun Building, 12A

Guanghua Road, Chaoyang, Beijing 100020, China; and Room 801, Unit 1, Building 8 Caiman

Street, Chaoyang Road, Beijing 100025, China; and Building 1–1, No. 67 Caiman Str.,

Chaoyang Road, Beijing 100123 China; and Room A407 Kelun Building, 12A

Guanghua Road, Chaoyang, Beijing 100020, China; and Rm 602, 5/F, No. 106 NanHu Road,

ChaoYang District, Beijing, China (See alternate addresses under Hong Kong); (6) Qing’an International Trading

Group, a.k.a., the following three aliases: —Qing’an International Trading Group

Company; and —Qing’an Company Shenzhen Station;

and —China Qing’an International Trading

Group. No. 27 Xiaoyun Road, Chaoyang

District, Beijing 100027 China; and Room 901, Qing An Building, No. 27,

Xiaoyun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100027, China; (7) Su Bin, a.k.a., the following two aliases: —Stephen Subin; and


### 44682 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

—Steve Su. Room 8306 Kelun Building, 12A

Guanghua Road, Chaoyang, Beijing 100020, China; and Room 801, Unit 1, Building 8 Caiman

Street, Chaoyang Road, Beijing 100025, China; and Building 1–1, No. 67 Caiman Str.,

Chaoyang Road, Beijing 100123, China; and Room A407 Kelun Building, 12A

Guanghua Road, Chaoyang, Beijing 100020, China; and Rm 602, 5/F, No. 106 NanHu Road,

ChaoYang District, Beijing, China (See alternate addresses under Hong Kong).
Hong Kong

(1) PRC Lode Technology Company, Rm 1019–1020 Nan Fung Centre, 264–

298 Castle Peak Road, Tsuen Wan New Territories, Hong Kong; and Room 1522 Nan Fung Centre, 264–298

Castle Peak Road, Tsuen Wan New Territories, Hong Kong (See alternate addresses under China); (2) Su Bin, a.k.a., the following two aliases: —Stephen Subin; and —Steve Su. Rm 1019–1020 Nan Fung Centre, 264–

298 Castle Peak Road, Tsuen Wan New Territories, Hong Kong; and Room 1522 Nan Fung Centre, 264–298

Castle Peak Road, Tsuen Wan New Territories, Hong Kong (See alternate addresses under China).

Iran

(1) FIMCO FZE, No. 3, Rahim Salehi Alley, Akbari St.,

Roomi Bridge, Dr. Shariati Ave, P.O. Box 3379, Tehran, Iran 3379/19395 (See alternate address under U.A.E.).

United Arab Emirates

(1) Crescent International Trade and Services FZE, Office No. B34BS33O111, Jebel Ali,

U.A.E.; (2) FIMCO FZE, LOB 16, F16401, P.O. Box 61342, JAFZ,

U.A.E. (See alternate address under Iran).
(3) Khosrow Kasraei, P.O. Box 61342, Jebel Ali, U.A.E.;

(4) Mujahid Ali, a.k.a. the following one alias: —Mujahid Ali Mahmood Ali Office No. B34BS33O111, Jebel Ali,

U.A.E. Savings Clause

Shipments of items removed from eligibility for a License Exception or export or reexport without a license (NLR) as a result of this regulatory action that were en route aboard a carrier to a port of export or reexport, on August 1, 2014, pursuant to actual orders for export or reexport to a foreign destination, may proceed to that destination under the previous eligibility for a License Exception or export or reexport without a license (NLR). Export Administration Act

Although the Export Administration Act expired on August 20, 2001, the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by Executive Order 13637 of March 8, 2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013) and as extended by the Notice of August 8, 2013, 78 FR 49107 (August 12, 2013), has continued the Export Administration Regulations in effect under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. BIS continues to carry out the provisions of the Export Administration Act, as appropriate and to the extent permitted by law, pursuant to Executive Order 13222 as amended by Executive Order 13637. Rulemaking Requirements

1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. This rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866.

2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required to respond to nor be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information, subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ) (PRA) unless that collection of information displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number. This regulation involves collections previously approved by OMB under control number 0694–0088, Simplified Network Application Processing System, which includes, among other things, license applications and carries a burden estimate of 43.8 minutes for a manual or electronic submission. Total burden hours associated with the PRA and OMB control number 0694–0088 are not expected to increase as a result of this rule. You may send comments regarding the collection of information associated with this rule, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Jasmeet K. Seehra, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), by email to Jasmeet

_K.

_Seehra@ omb.eop.gov, or by fax to (202) 395–
7285.

3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications as that term is defined in Executive Order
13132.

4. For the sixteen persons added under nineteen entries to the Entity List in this final rule, the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553) requiring notice of proposed rulemaking, the opportunity for public comment and a delay in effective date are inapplicable because this regulation involves a military or foreign affairs function of the United States. ( See 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). BIS implements this rule to protect U.S. national security or foreign policy interests by preventing items from being exported, reexported, or transferred (in country) to the persons being added to the Entity List. If this rule were delayed to allow for notice and comment and a delay in effective date, then entities being added to the Entity List by this action would continue to be able to receive items without a license and to conduct activities contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States. In addition, because these parties may receive notice of the U.S. Government’s intention to place these entities on the Entity List if a proposed rule is published, doing so would create an incentive for these persons to either accelerate receiving items subject to the EAR to conduct activities that are contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States, or to take steps to set up additional aliases, change addresses, and other measures to try to limit the impact of the listing on the Entity List once a final rule was published. Further, no other law requires that a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment be given for this rule. Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment are not required to be given for this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553, or by any other law, the analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., are not applicable. Accordingly, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required and none has been prepared.


### 44683 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

List of Subject in 15 CFR Part 744

Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Terrorism.

Accordingly, part 744 of the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR parts 730–774) is amended as follows:

**PART 744—[AMENDED]**

■ 1. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 744 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59 FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 12947, 60 FR 5079, 3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p. 356; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3 CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13224, 66 FR 49079, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 786; Notice of August 8, 2013, 78 FR 49107 (August 12, 2013); Notice of September 18, 2013, 78 FR 58151 (September 20, 2013); Notice of November 7, 2013, 78 FR 67289 (November 12, 2013); Notice of January 21, 2014, 79 FR 3721 (January 22, 2014).

■ 2. Supplement No. 4 to part 744 is amended: ■ a. By adding under Afghanistan, in alphabetical order, five Afghani entities;

■ b. By adding under China, in alphabetical order, seven Chinese entities;

■ c. By adding under Hong Kong, in alphabetical order, two Hong Kong entities;

■ d. By adding under Iran, one Iranian entity; and

■ e. By adding under United Arab Emirates, in alphabetical order, four Emirati entities.

The additions read as follows: Supplement No. 4 to Part 744—Entity List

Country Entity License requirement License review policy Federal Register citation

*******

AFGHANISTAN

*****

Emal Bilal Construction Company (EBCC), a.k.a., the following two aliases:

—Imal Bilal Road Construction Company; and—Aimal and Balal Company.Kolola Pushta, Charahi Gul-eSurkh, Kabul, Afghanistan; and Maidan Sahr, HetefaqMarket, Paktiya, Afghanistan. For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER] 8/1/2014.

*****

Emal Bilal Mangal, a.k.a., the

following three aliases:

—Imal Bilal; and —Aimal Balal; and —Bellal Mangal.Kolola Pushta, Charahi Gul-eSurkh, Kabul, Afghanistan; and Maidan Sahr, HetefaqMarket, Paktiya, Afghanistan. For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER] 8/1/2014.

*****

Mohammad Jan Khan Mangal,

Kolola Pushta, Charahi Gule-Surkh, Kabul, Afghanistan; and Maidan Sahr, HetefaqMarket, Paktiya, Afghanistan. For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER] 8/1/2014.

*****

Shan Mahmoud Khan Mangal,

Kolola Pushta, Charahi Gule-Surkh, Kabul, Afghanistan; and Maidan Sahr, HetefaqMarket, Paktiya, Afghanistan. For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER] 8/1/2014.


### 44684 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

Country Entity License requirement License review policy Federal Register citation

*******

Wahab Karwan Construction

Company (WKCC), Qabel Boy, Jalalabad Road, District 9, Kabul, Afghanistan. For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER] 8/1/2014.

*****

*****

CHINA

*****

Beijing Aeronautics Yangpu

Technology Investment Company (BAYTIC), a.k.a., the following three aliases:

—Beijing Aerospace

Yangpu Technology Investment Company; and —Tian Hang Yang Pu

Technology Investment Limited Company; and —Bei Jing Tian Hang

Yang Pu Technology Investment Limited Company. No. 27 Xiaoyun Road,

Chaoyang District, Beijing 100027, China; and Room 3120, Building 1, 16 ZhufangRoad, Haidian District, Beijing, China. For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER] 8/1/2014.

*****

Chengdu GaStone Technology

Co., Ltd. (CGTC), 31F, A Tower, Yanlord Square, No. 1, Section 2, Renmind South Road, Chengdu, China. For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER] 8/1/2014.

*****

China Electronics Technology

Group Corporation 29(CETC 29) Research Institute, a.k.a., the following two aliases:

—CETC 29th Research

Institute; and—China Southwest Electronic Equipment Research Institute (SWIEE) No. 496 West Yingkang Road,

Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610036, China; and Box #429, #1 Waixichadianziheng Street, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610036, China. For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER] 8/1/2014.

*****

Jiangsu Leidian Technology

Company (JLTC), 88 Luyuan Road, Yixing Environmental Sciences Park, Jiangsu Province, China. For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER] 8/1/2014.


### 44685 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

Country Entity License requirement License review policy Federal Register citation

*****

PRC Lode Technology Company, Room 8306 Kelun Building, 12A Guanghua Road, Chaoyang, Beijing 100020, China; and Room 801, Unit 1, Building 8 Caiman Street, Chaoyang Road, Beijing 100025, China; and Building 1–1, No. 67 Caiman Str., Chaoyang Road, Beijing 100123, China; and Room A407 Kelun Building, 12A Guanghua Road, Chaoyang, Beijing 100020, China; and Rm 602, 5/F, No. 106 NanHu Road, ChaoYang District, Beijing, China (See alternate addresses under Hong Kong). For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER] 8/1/2014.

*****

Qing’an International Trading

Group, a.k.a., the following three aliases:

—Qing’an International

Trading Group Company; and —Qing’an Company

Shenzhen Station; and—China Qing’an International Trading Group. No. 27 Xiaoyun Road,

Chaoyang District, Beijing 100027, China; and Room 901, Qing An Building, No. 27, Xiaoyun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China 100027, China. For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER] 8/1/2014.

*****

Su Bin, a.k.a., the following

two aliases:

—Stephen Subin; and —Steve Su. Room 8306 Kelun Building,

12A Guanghua Road, Chaoyang, Beijing 100020, China; and Room 801, Unit 1, Building 8 Caiman Street, Chaoyang Road, Beijing 100025, China; and Building 1–1, No. 67 Caiman Str., Chaoyang Road, Beijing 100123, China; and Room A407 Kelun Building, 12A Guanghua Road, Chaoyang, Beijing 100020, China; and Rm 602, 5/F, No. 106NanHu road, ChaoYang District, Beijing, China (See alternate addresses under Hong Kong). For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER] 8/1/2014.

*****


### 44686 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

Country Entity License requirement License review policy Federal Register citation

*******

HONG KONG

*****

PRC Lode Technology Company, Rm 1019–1020 NanFung Centre, 264–298 Castle Peak Road, Tsuen Wan New Territories, Hong Kong; and Room 1522 Nan Fung Centre, 264–298 Castle Peak Road, Tsuen Wan New Territories, Hong Kong (See alternate addresses under China). For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER] 8/1/2014.

*****

Su Bin, a.k.a., the following

two aliases:

—Stephen Subin; and —Steve Su. Rm 1019–1020 Nan Fung

Centre, 264–298 Castle Peak Road, Tsuen Wan New Territories, Hong Kong; and Room 1522 Nan Fung Centre, 264–298 Castle Peak Road, Tsuen Wan New Territories, Hong Kong (See alternate addresses under China). For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER ] 8/1/2014.

*****

IRAN

*****

FIMCO FZE, No. 3, Rahim

Salehi Alley, Akbari St., Roomi Bridge, Dr. Shariati Ave, P.O. Box 3379, Tehran,Iran 3379/19395 (See alternate address under U.A.E.). For all items subject to the EAR (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE ] 8/1/2014.

*******

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES

*****

Crescent International Trade

and Services FZE, Office No. B34BS33O111, Jebel Ali, U.A.E. For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER ] 8/1/2014.

*****

FIMCO FZE, LOB 16, F16401,

P.O. Box 61342, JAFZ,U.A.E. (See alternate addresses under Iran). For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER ] 8/1/2014.

*****

Khosrow Kasraei, P.O. Box

61342, Jebel Ali, U.A.E. For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER ] 8/1/2014.


### 44687 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

Country Entity License requirement License review policy Federal Register citation

*****

Mujahid Ali, a.k.a. the following

one alias:

—Mujahid Ali Mahmood

Ali Office No. B34BS33O111,

Jebel Ali, U.A.E. For all items subject to the EAR. (See § 744.11 of the EAR). Presumption of denial. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER ] 8/1/2014.

*****

*******

Dated: July 25, 2014. Kevin J. Wolf, Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014–17960 Filed 7–31–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3510–33–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY**

**Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau** 

**27 CFR Part 9**

**[Docket No. TTB–2014–0001; T.D. TTB–122; Ref: Notice No. 141]** 

**RIN 1513–AC03**

**Establishment of the Manton Valley Viticultural Area** 

**AGENCY :**  Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.

**ACTION :**  Final rule; Treasury decision.

**SUMMARY :**  The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes the 11,178-acre ‘‘Manton Valley’’ viticultural area in Shasta and Tehama Counties in northern California. The viticultural area does not lie within or contain any other established viticultural area. TTB designates viticultural areas to allow vintners to better describe the origin of their wines and to allow consumers to better identify wines they may purchase.

**DATES :**  This final rule is effective September 2, 2014.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; phone 202–453–1039, ext. 175.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Background on Viticultural Areas TTB Authority

Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA Act), 27 U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe regulations for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, and malt beverages. The FAA Act provides that these regulations should, among other things, prohibit consumer deception and the use of misleading statements on labels and ensure that labels provide the consumer with adequate information as to the identity and quality of the product. The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the FAA Act pursuant to section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The Secretary has delegated various authorities through Treasury Department Order 120–01 (Revised), dated December 10, 2013, to the TTB Administrator to perform the functions and duties in the administration and enforcement of this law.

Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4) authorizes the establishment of definitive viticultural areas and the use of their names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9) sets forth the standards for the preparation and submission of petitions for the establishment or modification of American viticultural areas (AVAs) and lists the approved AVAs. Definition

Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-growing region having distinguishing features, as described in part 9 of the regulations, and a name and a delineated boundary, as established in part 9 of the regulations. These designations allow vintners and consumers to attribute a given quality, reputation, or other characteristic of a wine made from grapes grown in an area to the wine’s geographic origin. The establishment of AVAs allows vintners to describe more accurately the origin of their wines to consumers and helps consumers to identify wines they may purchase. Establishment of an AVA is neither an approval nor an endorsement by TTB of the wine produced in that

area. Requirements

Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2)) outlines the procedure for proposing an AVA and provides that any interested partymay petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as an AVA. Section 9.12 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12) prescribes standards for petitions for the establishment of AVAs. Petitions to establish an AVA must include the following:

• Evidence that the area within the proposed AVA boundary is nationally or locally known by the AVA name specified in the petition;

• An explanation of the basis for defining the boundary of the proposed AVA;

• A narrative description of the features of the proposed AVA that affect viticulture, such as climate, geology, soils, physical features, and elevation, that make the proposed AVA distinctive and distinguish it from adjacent areas outside the proposed AVA boundary;

• The appropriate United States Geological Survey (USGS) map(s) showing the location of the proposed AVA, with the boundary of the proposed AVA clearly drawn thereon; and

• A detailed narrative description of the proposed AVA boundary based on USGS map markings.