Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 26 / Monday, February 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 6907 

1 1 40 CFR 51.1008 (a)(2) and (b) do not apply for 

the Nogales area because they relate to requirements 

for attainment demonstrations and reasonable 

further progress (RFP); these requirements were 

suspended for the Nogales PM2.5 nonattainment 

area so long as the area continues to meet the PM2.5

standard. For further discussion of our Clean Data 

Policy as applied to the Nogales area, refer to our 

proposed rule (77 FR 65656, October 30, 2012) and 

final rule (78 FR 887, January 7, 2013). 

2Although the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 

District of Columbia (D.C. Circuit) recently 

remanded this rule and directed EPA to repromulgate it pursuant to subpart 4 of part D, title 

I of the CAA (see Natural Resources Defense 

Council v. EPA, 706 F.3d 428 (D.C. Cir. 2013)), the 

court’s ruling in this case does not affect EPA’s 

action on these emissions inventories. Subpart 4 of 

part D, title I of the Act contains no specific 

provision governing emissions inventories for PM10

or PM2.5 nonattainment areas that supersedes the 

general emissions inventory requirement for all 

nonattainment areas in CAA section 172(c)(3). See 

‘‘State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for 

the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act 

Amendments of 1990,’’ 57 FR 13498, (April 16, 

1992). 

requested this deviation to facilitate the 

installation of new rail joints on the 

bridge. The bridge, also known as the St. 

Johns Railway Bridge, crosses the 

Willamette River at mile 6.9 and 

provides 54 feet of vertical clearance 

above Columbia River Datum 0.0 while 

in the closed position. Under normal 

operations, this bridge opens on signal 

as required by 33 CFR 117.5. The 

deviation period is from 7 a.m. to noon 

on February 12, 2015; from 7 a.m. to 

noon on February 13, 2015. This 

deviation allows the lift span of the 

BNSF Railway Bridge across the 

Willamette River, mile 6.9, to remain in 

the closed to navigation position, and 

need not open for maritime traffic 

during the periods listed above. The 

bridge shall operate in accordance with 

33 CFR 117.5 at all other times. BNSF 

will entertain requests from mariners to 

change the above listed schedule for 

emergent vessel arrivals or departures 

that are dependent on water level, given 

72 hours advanced notice. The BNSF 

contact is Jeff Swanson, who can be 

reached at (701) 412–6593. Waterway 

usage on this part of the Willamette 

River includes vessels ranging from 

commercial tug and barge to small 

pleasure craft. 

Vessels able to pass through the 

bridge in the closed positions may do so 

at any time. The BNSF Railway Bridge 

will not be able to open for emergencies, 

and there is no immediate alternate 

route for vessels to pass. The Coast 

Guard will also inform the users of the 

waterways through our Local and 

Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the 

change in operating schedule for the 

bridge so that vessels can arrange their 

transits to minimize any impact caused 

by the temporary deviation. 

In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), 

the drawbridge must return to its regular 

operating schedule immediately at the 

end of the effective period of this 

temporary deviation. This deviation 

from the operating regulations is 

authorized under 33 CFR 117.35. 

Dated: January 27, 2015. 

Steven M. Fischer, 

Bridge Administrator, Thirteenth Coast Guard 

District. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02475 Filed 2–6–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0450; FRL–9922–74– 

Region 9] 

Revision to the Arizona State 

Implementation Plan; Nogales 

Nonattainment Area; Fine Particulate 

Matter Emissions Inventories 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking final action to 

approve revisions to the Arizona State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) concerning 

the Nogales fine particle (PM2.5) 

nonattainment area 2008 and 2010 

emissions inventories. These emission 

inventories were submitted for the 2006 

24-hour fine particle (PM2.5) National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard 

(NAAQS). We are approving these 

annual emissions inventories under the 

Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). 

DATES: This rule will be effective on 

March 11, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket 

number EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0450 for 

this action. In most cases, documents in 

the docket for this action are available 

electronically at http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, California 94105–3901. 

While all documents in the docket are 

listed at http://www.regulations.gov, 

some information may be publicly 

available only at the hard copy location 

(e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, 

multi-volume reports), and some may 

not be available in either location (e.g., 

confidential business information 

(CBI)). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry 

Wamsley, EPA Region IX, (415) 947– 

4111, wamsley.jerry@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Proposed Action 

II. Public Comments 

III. EPA Action 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Proposed Action 

On September 2, 2014, EPA proposed 

to approve and incorporate into the 

Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

the PM2.5 emissions inventories for the 

Nogales nonattainment area titled 

‘‘Arizona State Implementation Plan 

Revision for the Nogales PM2.5

Nonattainment Area’’ (79 FR 51923). 

Submitted by Arizona on September 6, 

2013, the Nogales area emissions 

inventories provide annual 2008 and 

2010 emissions estimates (tons per year) 

for PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursors (i.e., 

nitrogen oxides (NOX), volatile organic 

compounds (VOCs), sulfur dioxide 

(SO2), and ammonia (NH3)). The source 

categories include non-road mobile 

sources, non-point sources, on-road 

mobile sources, and point or stationary 

sources. The detailed Nogales emissions 

inventories are found in Appendix A of 

Arizona’s submittal. 

We proposed to approve this revision 

to the Arizona SIP because we 

determined that it complied with the 

relevant CAA requirements. EPA’s 

requirements for an emissions inventory 

for the PM2.5 NAAQS are set forth in 40 

CFR 51.1008.1 2 We reviewed the results, 

procedures, and methodologies Arizona 

used to produce the 2008 and 2010 

Nogales area PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursor 

emissions inventories and found that 

these emissions inventories meet the 

requirements of the CAA and EPA 

guidance. Consequently, we proposed to 

approve the submitted PM2.5, NH3, NOX, 

SO2, and VOC emissions inventories as 

meeting the CAA’s section 172(c)(3) 

requirement to provide a 

comprehensive, accurate, and current 

inventory of actual emissions for the 

Nogales nonattainment area. 

Our proposed action provides more 

information on Arizona’s PM2.5

emissions inventories submittal and our 

evaluation (79 FR 51923, September 2, 

2014). 


rljohnson on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
6908 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 26 / Monday, February 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

II. Public Comments 

EPA provided a 30-day public 

comment period as part of our proposed 

action on the 2008 and 2010 Nogales 

area PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursor pollutant 

emissions inventories submitted by 

Arizona. We received no comments on 

our proposal. 

III. EPA Action 

EPA is taking final action to approve 

the 2008 and 2010 Nogales 

nonattainment area PM2.5 and PM2.5

precursor pollutant emissions 

inventories submitted by Arizona and 

incorporate them into the SIP, as 

authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the 

CAA. We determined that Arizona’s 

submittal is consistent with sections 110 

and 172(c)(3) of the CAA. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

State choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 

Accordingly, this action merely 

approves these emissions inventories as 

meeting Federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by State law. For 

that reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address 

disproportionate human health or 

environmental effects with practical, 

appropriate, and legally permissible 

methods under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

This SIP is not approved to apply on 

any Indian reservation land or in any 

other area where EPA or an Indian tribe 

has demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 

country, the rule does not have tribal 

implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by April 10, 2015. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this action for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements (see section 

307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Ammonia, 

Volatile organic compounds. 

Dated: January 23, 2015. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart D—Arizona 

■ 2. Section 52.120 is amended by 

adding paragraph (c)(164) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.120 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(164) A plan revision was submitted 

on September 6, 2013 by the Governor’s 

Designee. 

(i) [Reserved] 

(ii) Additional materials. 

(A) Arizona Department of 

Environmental Quality. 

(1) ‘‘Arizona State Implementation 

Plan Revision for the Nogales PM2.5

Nonattainment Area’’, dated September 

2013, including appendices A and B. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02490 Filed 2–6–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

GENERAL SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION 

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND 

SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

48 CFR Parts 1, 2, 9, 12, 22, 42, and 52 

[FAC 2005–80; FAR Case 2013–001; 

Corrections; Docket 2013–0001; Sequence 

No. 1] 

RIN 9000–AM55 

Federal Acquisition Regulation; 

Ending Trafficking in Persons; 

Corrections 

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), 

General Services Administration (GSA), 

and National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration (NASA). 

ACTION: Final rule; corrections. 

SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA are 

issuing corrections to FAR Case 2013– 

001; Ending Trafficking in Persons (Item 


rljohnson on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES