### 51948 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 28, 2012 / Proposed Rules

(f) Compliance

You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions have already been done.
(g) Wiring Modifications

Within 6,000 flight hours or 36 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first: Incorporate the wiring modifications specified in and in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 8–24–87, Revision B, dated April 3, 2012.
(h) Airplane Maintenance Program Revision

Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD: Revise the airplane maintenance program by incorporating Task 2420/13, Operational Check of Relays K4, K5, K6, and K7 (Post Modsum 8Q101917), in the applicable temporary revision specified in paragraph (h)(1), (h)(2), or (h)(3) of this AD. The initial compliance time for Task 2420/13 is within 18,000 flight hours after accomplishing the actions specified in paragraph (g) of this AD, or 30 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.

(1) For Model DHC–8–102, –103, and –106 airplanes: de Havilland Dash 8 Series 100 Temporary Revision AWL–117, dated April 8, 2011, to Section AWL—Systems Maintenance, of Part 2, Airworthiness Limitations, of the Bombardier Dash 8 Series 100 Maintenance Program Manual, PSM 1–8–
7. (2) For Model DHC–8–201 and –202 airplanes: de Havilland Dash 8 Series 200 Temporary Revision AWL 2–48, dated April 8, 2011, to Section AWL—Systems Maintenance, of Part 2, Airworthiness Limitations, of the Bombardier Dash 8 Series 200 Maintenance Program Manual, PSM 1–
82–7.

(3) For Model DHC–8–301, –311, and –315 airplanes: de Havilland Dash 8 Series 300 Temporary Revision AWL 3–118, dated April 8, 2011, to Section AWL—Systems Maintenance, of Part 2, Airworthiness Limitations, of the Bombardier Dash 8 Series 300 Maintenance Program Manual, PSM 1–
83–7.
(i) No Alternative Actions or Intervals

After accomplishing the revision required by paragraph (h) of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals may be used, unless the actions and intervals are approved as an AMOC in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (k)(1) of this AD.
(j) Credit for Previous Actions

This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD using Bombardier Service Bulletin 8–24–87, dated May 26, 2011; or Bombardier Service Bulletin 8–24– 87, Revision A, dated October 5, 2011.
(k) Other FAA AD Provisions

The following provisions also apply to this AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516– 794–5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/ certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(l) Related Information

(1) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF–2012–09, dated February 15, 2012, and the service information specified in paragraphs (l)(1)(i) through (l)(1)(iv) of this AD, for related information.

(i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 8–24–87, Revision B, dated April 3, 2012.

(ii) de Havilland Dash 8 Series 100 Temporary Revision AWL–117, dated April 8, 2011, to Section AWL—Systems Maintenance, of Part 2, Airworthiness Limitations, of the Bombardier Dash 8 Series 100 Maintenance Program Manual, PSM 1–8–

7. (iii) de Havilland Dash 8 Series 200 Temporary Revision AWL 2–48, dated April 8, 2011, to Section AWL—Systems Maintenance, of Part 2, Airworthiness Limitations, of the Bombardier Dash 8 Series 200 Maintenance Program Manual, PSM 1–

82–7.

(iv) de Havilland Dash 8 Series 300 Temporary Revision AWL 3–118, dated April 8, 2011, to Section AWL—Systems Maintenance, of Part 2, Airworthiness Limitations, of the Bombardier Dash 8 Series 300 Maintenance Program Manual, PSM 1–

83–7.

(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., Q-Series Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone 416–375–4000; fax 416–375–4539; email thd.qseries@aero.bombardier.com;
Internet http://www.bombardier.com . You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call

425–227–1221. Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 22, 2012. Ali Bahrami, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 2012–21102 Filed 8–27–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Chapter 1**

**[Docket No. FAA–2012–0754]**

**Airport Improvement Program (AIP): Policy Regarding Access to Airports**  **From Residential Property; Correction**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Proposed policy; implementation of Section 136; opportunity to comment; correction and extension of time to comment.

**SUMMARY :**  The FAA is correcting an inadvertent omission in the Addresses paragraph in the Proposed Policy Regarding Access to Airports From Residential Property that was published in the Federal Register on July 30, 2012. The FAA is also extending the comment period to September 14, 2012.

**DATES :**  The comment period for the proposed policy document published July 30, 2012 (77 FR 44515), is extended to September 14, 2012.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Randall S. Fiertz, telephone: (202) 267– 3085; facsimile: (202) 267–5257; email: randall.fiertz@faa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
Need for Correction

On July 30, 2012, the Federal Aviation Administration published a Notice of Proposed Policy in the Federal Register at 77 FR 44515 proposing an FAA policy, based on Federal law, concerning through-the-fence access to a federally obligated airport from an adjacent or nearby property, when that property is used as a residence. The Notice also proposed to limit application of the FAA’s previously published interim policy (76 FR 15028; March 18, 2011) to commercial service airports that certified existing residential through-the-fence access agreements and rescind applicability of this interim policy with regard to certain general aviation airports consistent with section 136 of Public Law 112–95. In addition, that notice described how the FAA will interpret provisions of the law pertaining to


### 51949 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 28, 2012 / Proposed Rules

residential through-the-fence access and invited comments.

There was an inadvertent omission in the Notice which FAA is correcting through this amendment. In the Addresses paragraph, the FAA inadvertently omitted the applicable Department of Transportation Docket Number.

Correction

In the document published on July 30, 2012 (77 FR 44515) FR Doc. 2010– 18058, on page 44515 in column 3, under the heading **ADDRESSES** paragraph of this document, replace ‘‘Docket Number FAA–2012–XXX’’ with ‘‘Docket Number FAA–2012–0754’’.

Extension of Time To Comment

The Experimental Aircraft Association requested the FAA extend the comment period an additional two weeks. The FAA believes this is a reasonable request and hereby extends the comment period to September 14,
2012.

Dated: Issued in Washington, DC, on August 22, 2012. Randall S. Fiertz, Director, Airport Compliance and Management Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2012–21147 Filed 8–27–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES** 

**Food and Drug Administration**

**21 CFR Part 21**

**[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0252]**

**Office of the Secretary**

**45 CFR Part 5b**

**Privacy Act, Exempt Record System**

**AGENCY :**  Office of the Secretary, Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule.

**SUMMARY :**  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) will be implementing a new system of records, 09–10–0020, ‘‘FDA Records Related to Research Misconduct Proceedings, HHS/FDA/OC.’’ HHS/FDA proposes to exempt this system of records from certain requirements of the Privacy Act to protect the integrity of FDA’s scientific misconduct inquiries and investigations and to protect the identity of confidential sources in such investigations. **DATES :**  Submit either electronic or written comments by November 13, 2012. If HHS/FDA receives any significant adverse comments, the Agency will publish a document withdrawing the direct final rule within 30 days after the comment period ends. HHS/FDA will then proceed to respond to comments under this proposed rule using the usual notice and comment procedures.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FDA–2011–N– 0252, by any of the following methods:

Electronic Submissions

Submit electronic comments in the following way:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

Written Submissions

Submit written submissions in the following ways:

• FAX: 301–827–6870.

• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (For paper or CD–ROM submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA– 305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

Instructions: All submissions received must include the Agency name and docket number for this rulemaking. All comments received may be posted without change to http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. For additional information on submitting comments, see the ‘‘Request for Comments’’ heading of the

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** section of this document.

Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to http:// www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into the ‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Frederick Sadler, Division of Freedom of Information, Office of Public Information & Library Services, Food and Drug Administration, 12420 Parklawn Dr., Rockville, MD 20857, 301–796–8975, Frederick.Sadler@fda.hhs.gov

. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  I. Background

FDA is implementing a new system of records called the ‘‘FDA Records Related to Research Misconduct Proceedings.’’ The purpose of this system of records is to implement FDA’s responsibilities for addressing research integrity and misconduct, in accordance with the Public Health Service (PHS) Policies on Research Misconduct (42 CFR part 93), for research performed by persons who are FDA employees, agents of the Agency, or who are affiliated with the Agency by contract or agreement. The term ‘‘research misconduct’’ is defined at 42 CFR 93.103 to mean ‘‘fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results.’’ The general policy of the PHS Policies on Research Misconduct is that ‘‘Research misconduct involving PHS support is contrary to the interests of the PHS and the Federal government and to the health and safety of the public, to the integrity of research, and to the conservation of public funds.’’ (42 CFR 93.100(a)). The PHS Policies on Research Misconduct provide for a number of HHS administrative actions that can be taken in response to a research misconduct proceeding, such as the suspension of a contract, debarment, or an adverse personnel action against a Federal employee (42 CFR 93.407). In addition, under 42 CFR 93.401, FDA shall at any time during a research misconduct proceeding notify HHS’ Office of Research Integrity (ORI) immediately to ensure that FDA’s Office of Criminal Investigations, HHS Office of Inspector General, the Department of Justice, or other appropriate law enforcement Agencies, are notified if there is a reasonable indication of possible violations of civil or criminal law.

FDA’s new system of records will be modeled after the system of records maintained by ORI, entitled ‘‘HHS Records Related to Research Misconduct Proceedings, HHS/OPHS/ORI’’ System No. 09–37–0021 (59 FR 36717, July 19, 1994; revised most recently at 75 FR 44847, August 31, 2009).

FDA’s scientific misconduct inquiry and investigation records are located in the Office of the Chief Scientist in FDA’s Office of the Commissioner. FDA is preparing to organize and operate these records as a ‘‘system of records’’ as that term is defined by the Privacy Act. FDA is publishing a System of Records Notice (SORN) for this system in the Federal Register contemporaneous with publication of this proposed rule.

Under the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a), individuals have a right of access to information pertaining to them which is contained in a system of records. At the same time, the Privacy Act permits certain types of systems to be exempt