alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CalEnergy Company, Inc.                                 Exhibit 11

Calculation of Earnings per share in accordance
with Interpretive Release No. 34-9083
For the three years ended December 31, 1996

(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)


                                                 1996        1995        1994
Actual weighted average shares outstanding
  for the period                              54,739,097   47,248,807 33,187,971

Dilutive stock options and warrants using
  average market prices                        3,130,877    2,722,348  2,533,301

Primary shares outstanding                    57,869,974   49,971,155 35,721,272
Additional dilutive stock options using
 ending market price and assuming
 conversion of convertible debt, 
 convertible subordinated debenture and
 convertible preferred securities of
 subsidiary trust*                             9,293,812    7,771,195  4,444,444

Fully dilutive shares outstanding             67,163,786   57,742,350 40,165,716

Income after minority interst and before
 extraordinary item                               92,461       63,415     38,834

Extraordinary item                                     -            -    (2,007)

Net income                                        92,461       63,415     36,827

Less: Series C preferred stock
dividends                                              -       (1,080)   (5,010)

Net income available for common shareholders   $  92,461    $  62,335   $ 31,817

Primary earnings per share before
  extraordinary item                           $    1.60    $    1.25   $    .95

Extraordinary item per share                           -            -      (.06)

Primary earnings per share                     $    1.60    $    1.25   $    .89

Fully diluted earnings per share before
 extraordinary item based on SEC 
 Interpretive Release No. 34-9083**            $    1.50    $    1.18   $    .93

Extraordinary item per share share                     -            -      (.06)

Fully diluted earnings per share based on SEC Interpretive
  Release No. 34-9083**                        $    1.50    $    1.18    $   .88


*  The ending market price on December 31, 1994 was lower than
the average market price for the twelve months ended December 31,
1994.  Accordingly, inclusion of an adjustment for stock options
would be antidilutive and, therefore, contrary to paragraph 40 of
APB Opinion 15.

**The net income available for common shareholders for the year
ended December 31, 1996 was increased by the interest expense,
net of tax effect, associated with the convertible preferred
securities of subsidiary trust, convertible debt and convertible
subordinated debentures of $7,949.  Net income available for
common shareholders for the years ended December 31, 1995  was
increased by the interest expense, net of tax effect, associated
with the convertible debt and convertible subordinated debentures
of $6,038.  Net income available for common shareholders for the
years ended December 31, 1994 was increased by the interest
expense, net of tax effect, associated with the convertible
subordinated debentures of $3,475.
EXHIBIT 32
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Salisbury  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period  ending  December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
John F. Perotti,  Chairman and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  and I,
John F. Foley,  Chief Financial  Officer and Treasurer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/  John F. Perotti                            /s/  John F. Foley
----------------------------                    ----------------------------
     John F. Perotti                                 John F. Foley
     Chairman and                                    Chief Financial Officer
     Chief Executive Officer                         and Treasurer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Gilberto HERRERA.

No. 97-KH-3014.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1998.

In re Herrera, Gilberto; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KA95 1521; Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 229851.

Denied.

KNOLL, J., not on panel.
#### In the Matter of Eleanor Van Tassel, Appellant, v County of Orange, Respondent.

[614 NYS2d 193]

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the County of Orange terminating her employment as a Nursing Assistant for the County of Orange, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Barone, J.), dated June 5, 1992, which dismissed the proceeding on the ground that the petitioner had failed to exhaust her administrative remedies.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, *561Orange County for determination of the petition on the merits.

The Supreme Court erred in concluding that the petitioner was “required to exhaust her administrative remedies” by submitting this matter to arbitration pursuant to the “grievance procedure” set forth in Article 30 of the parties’ collective bargaining agreement. The petitioner’s application does not constitute a “grievance”, as defined in the agreement, and thus she is not required to pursue the grievance procedure culminating in arbitration. Since this matter falls outside the scope of the parties’ agreement to arbitrate *(see, Matter of County of Rockland [Primiano Constr. Co.],*51 NY2d 1, 5), we find that the petitioner is entitled to judicial review of the determination terminating her employment. Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.
## SERVE D NOVEMBE R10 , 201 1 JERARTMENTO F U.S . DEPARTMENTO FTRANSPORTATIO N ; MANSFORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S JOCKtT OPERATION S WASHINGTON , D C ZOi i NO V 1 0 P 1:1" ! I N THE MATTEROf : ) ) Docke t

No . [T o B e Assigned ] BRUNILD A ROS A ) ) FDM S No . FAA-2011-066 9 Responden t

) OIU)E R SETTIN GSECON D LITIGATIO N SCHEDULIN GCONFERENC E On Wednesday , Novembe r 09 , 2011 , th e partie s appeare dby telephon e fo r aLitigatio n Schedulin g Conference . Th e partie s discusse dth e statu s o f th e case , thei r

calendar availability , andagree dto reconven e fo r asecon dlitigatio n schedulin g conference . I t I s Hereb y Ordered ; 1 . Th e partie s shal l reconven e b y telephon e for

asecon dlitigatio n schedulin g conferenc e on Thursday , Decembe r 1,201 1 a t

10:3 0 a mEaster n time . Th e Offic e o f Hearing s shal l initiat e th e conferenc e call . 2 . Prio r to December

1 , 2011 , i f

th e partie s reac hasettlemen t an dwis ht o mov e t o cance l th e conference , the y mus t file th e necessary settlemen t withdrawal notic e o r othe r necessary document(s ) wit hth e Offic e o f

Hearings . 3 . I f th e partie s d o no t

reac hasettlement , th e Responden t shal l fil e awritte n Answer b y Tuesday , Novembe r

29 , 2011 . Th e Responden t ma y contac t Ms . C . Dian e Mays , a

t th e Offic e o f

Hearing s (202-366-2132) , fo r assistanc e on ho w t o file''th"e Answer .

va n rativ e Law Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFDMSNO . FAA-2011-066 9 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Brunild aRosa , Responden l 208 4 Bron x Plac e Eas t Apt . 5 J Bronx , N Y 1046 2 Rya n M . Landers , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counsel , ASO- 7 Souther n Regio n P.O . Bo x 2063 6 Atlanta , G A 3032 0 TEL : . 404-305-520 0 FAX : 404-305-522 3 Th e Honorabl e J.E . Sullivan , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r service i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier, use ih

e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , 60

0 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 2059! ; Auention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC^30 .

- 2 -
# C_2014253EN.01002203.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/22

---

Order of the President of the Court of 31 March 2014 — Acron OAO, Dorogobuzh OAO v Council of the European Union, European Commission, Fertilizers Europe

(Joined Cases C-215/13 P and C-216/13 P) (1)

1

2014/C 253/31

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.

1

---
Home > Natural Gas > Major Legislative and Regulatory Actions > Repeal of the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act (1987)

Repeal of the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act (1987)

Description

The Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act (FUA) was passed in 1978 in response to concerns over national energy security.

The 1973 oil crisis and the natural gas curtailments of the mid 1970s contributed to concerns about U.S. supplies of oil and

natural gas. The FUA restricted construction of power plants using oil or natural gas as a primary fuel and encouraged the use

of coal, nuclear energy and other alternative fuels. It also restricted the industrial use of oil and natural gas in large boilers.

During the early 1980s, the demand for natural gas declined substantially, which contributed to a significant oversupply of

gas for much of the decade. Residual fuel oil, the main target of the FUA, was used for peak electricity generation; most new

base load power plants constructed in that decade were coal­fired or nuclear.

Falling natural gas demand and prices finally spurred the repeal in 1987 of sections of the FUA that restricted the use of

natural gas by industrial users and electric utilities. As a result of the repeal, natural gas and oil could again be used to fuel

large new baseload electric power plants, and restrictions on gas and oil­burning industrial boilers, turbines, and engines were

lifted. The FUA restrictions continued that had allowed industrial cogenerators to use natural gas if they met certain operating

conditions. Restrictions were eliminated for all new facilities constructed after 1987.

Impact

The repeal of the FUA set the stage for a dramatic increase in the use of natural gas for electric generation and industrial

processing. Natural gas consumption for electric generation rose from 2.6 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) in 1988 to 5.7 Tcf in 2002,

an increase of about 119 percent. Natural gas consumption for industrial processing rose from 6.4 Tcf in 1988 to 7.6 Tcf in

2002, an increase of almost 19 percent. Therefore, total natural gas consumption for electric generation and industrial

processing increased approximately 47 percent during that period. Natural gas became viewed as an economically efficient

and environmentally friendly fuel for electric generation and industrial processing when compared with other fossil fuels.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-10371 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JIMMY EARL WHITE, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:02-CR-304-ALL-D

-------------------- Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Counsel appointed to represent Jimmy Earl White, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). White has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and counsel is excused fromNo. 03-10371 -2- further responsibilities herein. The appeal is DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
# C_2014315EN.01002702.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/27

---

Order of the Court of 3 July 2014 — Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission

(Case C-102/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Action for annulment - Period for bringing proceedings - Validity of the notification of a Commission decision to the Permanent Representation of a Member State - Determination of the date of that notification - Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 181 - Appeal manifestly unfounded))

2014/C 315/42

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T.Henze and J. Möller, Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: R. Sauer and T. Maxian Rusche, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 164, 8 June 2013.

1

---
No. 74-5886.

#### Strawn *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
                                          
                                          
                                ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Sunrise Medical Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-44911
on Form S-4, Statement No. 33-88216 on Form S-8, Statement, No. 333-50047 on
Form S-8, Statement No. 33-82842 on Form S-8 and Statement No. 33-39887 on Form
S-8 of Sunrise Medical Inc. of our report dated August 19, 1998 relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Sunrise Medical Inc. and subsidiaries as of July
3, 1998 and June 27, 1997 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity and cash flows and related financial statement schedule for
each of the years in the three-year period ended July 3, 1998, which report
appears in the July 3, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Sunrise Medical Inc.



                                       KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Los Angeles, California
September 18, 1998



                                       64
No. 43277.

#### Protests 777732-G, etc., of Gimbel Bros., Inc., et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

On the authority of *Lamborn*v. *United States*(27 C. C. P. A. 46, C. A. D. 60) the protests were dismissed.
#### William Sequeira *v.*United States

No. 7763.

Entry No. 429-H.

(Decided December 9, 1949)

*Philip Stein*for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General *(Harold L. Grossman,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Cole, Judge:

This case concerns the proper dutiable value of several items of leather goods exported from Grande, Nicaragua, and entered at the port of Houston, Tex.

An agreed set of facts, upon which the case was submitted, establishes foreign value, section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. 1946 ed. § 1402 (c)), to be the proper basis for appraisement of the articles in question, and that such statutory values are as follows:

> Belts (men)_ 2.30 Nicaraguan cordobas each

> Billfolds (men)_ 4.50 Nicaraguan cordobas each

> Billfolds (men)_ 3.50 Nicaraguan cordobas each

> Coin purses (men)_ 1.50 Nicaraguan cordobas each

> Brief cases (men)_i_ 29.50 Nicaraguan cordobas each

> Purses (ladies)_ 13.00 Nicaraguan cordobas each

> Billfolds (ladies)_ 19.50 Nicaraguan cordobas each

> Billfolds (ladies)_ 17.50 Nicaraguan cordobas each

> Sandals_ 5.00 Nicaraguan cordobas each

> Travelers’ valises_110.00 Nicaraguan cordobas each

The foregoing prices are based on the value of 5 Nicaraguan cor-dobas to the United States dollar.

As to the items described on the invoice as “1 pair Shoes, Mens” ■and *“1*Skin, tanned Ocelot (tigre),” the appraised values are affirmed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 14-14-00209-CR OFFENSE: Aggravated Robbery

STYLE: Jonathan Glen Johnson v The State of Texas COUNTY: Harris

COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed rd TRIAL COURT: 263'" District Court

DATE: March 10. 2015 Publish: No TC CASE #:1377006

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

STYLE:Jonathan Glen Johnson v The State of Texas

CCA#

Ptos£ Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: &//» 2«? 2J>V

JUDGE: /*>

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

PC:

DNP:

FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 90 (Thursday, May 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 26190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10188]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


IRS/VA FFRDC Co-Sponsorship

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury, National Office 
Procurement.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and The Department of 
Veterans Affairs (VA) executed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on 
February 7, 2008 to designate VA as a Co-Sponsor of the Federally 
Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC), titled The Center for 
Enterprise Modernization (CEM). CEM is operated by The MITRE 
Corporation (MITRE). IRS remains the primary sponsor of this enterprise 
systems engineering and integration FFRDC; VA is a Co-Sponsor.
    VA has determined that it requires an FFRDC mission partner to 
assist in the achievement of its strategic and business enterprise 
modernization goals and the IRS FFRDC meets this need.

DATES: The Agency must receive comments on or before June 9, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by one of the following methods: 
Mail to: 6009 Oxon Hill Road, Suite 500, Oxon Hill, MD, attn: Carol 
Gentry, subject: Co-Sponsor Comments, or e-mail to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#befddfccd1d290ff90f9dbd0caccc7fed7cccd90d9d1c8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="17547665787b39563950727963656e577e656439707861">[email protected]</span></a>, subject: Co-Sponsor Comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information contact Carol 
Gentry at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7a391b081516543b543d1f140e08033a130809541d150c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="91d2f0e3fefdbfd0bfd6f4ffe5e3e8d1f8e3e2bff6fee7">[email protected]</span></a>.

Carol A. Gentry,
Contracting Officer, Internal Revenue Service.
 [FR Doc. E8-10188 Filed 5-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**-  South Atlantic  
-  Ctr. for Medical, Agricultural & Veterinary Entomology 
-  Mosquito and Fly Research Unit 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">		You are here: 						Research / 																				**Research Project:**Reducing Risk of Human and Domesticated Animal Infection with West Nile and Other Emerging Infectious Viruses Carried by Mosquitoes
**Location: Mosquito and Fly Research Unit**
												Project Number: 6615-32000-046-01Project Type:																				Specific Cooperative Agreement

Start Date: May 11, 2006End Date: Apr 30, 2011

**Objective:**The objective of this cooperative research project is to develop new methods and strategies to reduce the risk of human and domesticated animal infection with West Nile and other emerging infectious viruses carried by mosquitoes.
**Approach:**Discover, develop and evaluate new biological and chemical control methods for juvenile and adult mosquitoes that are the vectors of West Nile virus (WNV) and other emerging viruses (arboviruses). Track genetic changes in WNV and other arboviruses that may affect virulence to humans and animals using modern genetic techniques and GIS and remote sensing tools. Design new arbovirus risk reduction strategies based upon a better understanding of the natural history of arboviruses by considering the behavior of mosquitoes. Prepare for and reduce the risk of emerging arboviral disease transmission by identifying and characterizing the spatial and temporal distribution of viruses associated with mosquitoes and by developing new and improved sentinel (detection) systems for arbovirus vectors.
    Project TeamLinthicum, Kenneth  - *Ken* 
Project Annual Reports FY 2009 FY 2008 FY 2007 FY 2006 
Related National Programs Veterinary, Medical and Urban Entomology(104)  							Last Modified: 04/14/2010 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of ITSA Ltd. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hermano Studart Lins
de Albuquerque, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Hermano Studart Lins de Albuquerque


Hermano Studart Lins de Albuquerque
Chief Executive Officer
February 21, 2003