alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549
                                  FORM 10-KSB/A

(Mark One)
         X  Annual Report under Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934 (Fee required)

   For the fiscal year ended August 31, 1997

            Transition  report  under  Section  13 or 15 (d)  of the  Securities
            Exchange Act of 1934 (No fee required)

         For the transition period from __________ to __________

         Commission file number 0-13049

                          WATER-JEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                 (Name of Small Business Issuer in its Charter)

          New York                                13-3006788
(State of Other Jurisdiction of               (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)               Identification No.)

488 Madison Avenue, New York, New York              10022
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)          (Zip Code)

                              (212) 753-5511
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Issuer's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

     Securities registered under Section 12 (g) of the Exchange Act:

                                Common Stock
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              (Title of Class)

                                A Warrant
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              (Title of Class)

                                B Warrant
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              (Title of Class)

         Check whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the  registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for past 90 days. Yes X No_____

         Check if there is no  disclosure  of  delinquent  filers in response to
Item 405 of Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will
be contained,  to the best of  registrant's  knowledge,  in definitive  proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB
or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB.

         State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year.  $62,885,464

         State  the  aggregate   market  value  of  the  voting  stock  held  by
non-affiliates  computed by  reference to the price at which the stock was sold,
or the average bid and asked prices of such stock, as of a specified date within
the past 60 days. $7,599,018 as of November 15, 1997.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:  See Footnotes to Exhibits


<PAGE>



Exhibits

(23)(b)  Consent of Company's auditors,  Holtz Rubenstein & Co., LLP, dated
         March 5, 1998*


-----------------------------
     * Filed herewith
# C_2015138EN.01000401.xml

| 27.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 March 2015 — European Commission v Versalis SpA, formerly Polimeri Europa SpA, Eni SpA and Versalis SpA, formerly Polimeri Europa SpA, Eni SpA v European Commission

(Joined Cases C-93/13 P and C-123/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Chloroprene rubber market - Succession of production entities - Imputability of the unlawful conduct - Fines - Repeated infringement - Unlimited jurisdiction))

(2015/C 138/03)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

(C-93/13 P)

(C-93/13 P)

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, G. Conte and R. Striani, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Versalis SpA, formerly Polimeri Europa SpA, Eni SpA (represented by: M. Siragusa, G.M. Roberti, F. Moretti, I. Perego, F. Cannizzaro, A. Bardanzellu, D. Durante, and V. Laroccia, avvocati)

Other parties to the proceedings:

(C-123/13 P)

(C-123/13 P)

Appellants: Versalis SpA, formerly Polimeri Europa SpA, Eni SpA (represented by: M. Siragusa, G.M. Roberti, F. Moretti, I. Perego, F. Cannizzaro, A. Bardanzellu, D. Durante, and V. Laroccia, avvocati)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, G. Conte and R. Striani, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Rejects the appeals in Cases C-93/13 P and C-123/13 P; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Rejects the appeals in Cases C-93/13 P and C-123/13 P;

| 2) | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs relating to the appeal in Case C-93/13 P; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs relating to the appeal in Case C-93/13 P;

| 3) | Orders Versalis SpA and Eni SpA to pay the costs relating to the appeal in Case C-123/13 P. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders Versalis SpA and Eni SpA to pay the costs relating to the appeal in Case C-123/13 P.

---

(1)  OJ C 114, 20.4.2013.

1

OJ C 147, 25.5.2013.

---
No. 00-700.

#### Gray *v.*St. Martin’s Press, Inc., et al.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.1


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO


WJ COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


AMENDED AND RESTATED 2000 STOCK
INCENTIVE PLAN


 


This First Amendment to the WJ Communications, Inc.
(the “Company”) Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock
Incentive Plan”), is made pursuant to Section 12 of the Stock Incentive Plan.


 


WHEREAS, the
2000 Stock Incentive Plan was originally adopted by the Company and approved by
the stockholders in January 2000;


 


WHEREAS, in May 2002, the Board approved the
adoption of an amendment to the Plan to increase the number of shares of Common
Stock authorized for issuance from 16,500,000 to 19,000,000, which our
stockholders approved at the 2002 annual meeting of stockholders;


 


WHEREAS, in 2003, the Plan was amended with Board
and stockholder approval to add language regarding Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code and in 2005 the Board amended the Plan to add restricted
stock units and performance shares as permissible forms of awards under the
Plan as well as to add provisions designed to minimize the impact of section
409A of the Internal Revenue Code;


 


WHEREAS, on July 25, 2005 the Board approved
the Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan to encompass all of the
foregoing amendments into one document;


 


WHEREAS, in 2007 in connection with the Company’s
annual meeting, the Board of Directors approved a first amendment to the Stock
Incentive Plan to increase the shares available under the Plan from 19,000,000
to 19,500,000 (the “First Amendment”); and


 


WHEREAS, the First Amendment was approved by the
Company stockholders at the Company’s annual meeting on July 19, 2007.


 


NOW
THEREFORE:


 


The section 3 titled “Common
Stock Subject to Plan” of the Stock Incentive Plan is hereby amended to delete “19,000,000”
and insert “19,500,000” in its place to reflect an increase in the shares
reserved for use under the Stock Incentive Plan.


 


All other terms and
conditions of the Stock Incentive Plan, as amended remain in full force and
effect.


 


The First Amendment to the
Stock Incentive Plan was approved by the Board of Directors on June 8, 2007 and
submitted to, and approved by, the Company’s stockholders in connection with
the Company’s July 19, 2007 annual meeting.
No. 96-6036.

#### Amen-Ra, fka Tasby *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2282 

To extend the authorization of appropriations to carry out approved wetlands 

conservation projects under the North American Wetlands Conservation 

Act through fiscal year 2017. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2012 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. VITTER, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. 

COCHRAN, Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota, and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To extend the authorization of appropriations to carry out 

approved wetlands conservation projects under the North 

American Wetlands Conservation Act through fiscal year 

2017. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North American Wet5 lands Conservation Extension Act of 2012’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2282 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 Section 7(c)(5) of the North American Wetlands Con3 servation Act (16 U.S.C. 4406(c)(5)) is amended by strik4 ing ‘‘2012’’ and inserting ‘‘2017’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 42172.

#### Protests 564897-G, etc., of R. C. Williams & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the .authority of *Renken*v. *United States*(C. D. 73) and *Wile*v. *United States*(T. D. 49514) the biscuits in question were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as claimed.
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Oil & Gas, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-QSB"), I,
Andrew P. Calerich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 14, 2004

/s/  Andrew P. Calerich
------------------------
     Andrew P. Calerich
     Chief Financial Officer
# C_2014184EN.01002403.xml

| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/24

---

Order of the President of Court of 24 February 2014 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim — Germany) — Erich Pickert (C-347/13), Jürgen Hein (C-353/13), Hjördis Hein (C-353/13) v Condor Flugdienst GmbH

(Joined Cases C-347/13 and C-353/13) (1)

1

2014/C 184/39

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the cases be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                                      2,436,473
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 383,603
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                   447,750
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            3,291,371
<PP&E>                                        227,965
<DEPRECIATION>                                114,967
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              3,533,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         140,949
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                       110
<COMMON>                                      173,861
<OTHER-SE>                                     32,188
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                3,533,686
<SALES>                                        66,110
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               66,110
<CGS>                                          44,946
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  44,946
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,063,831
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4,606) 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,860,099)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    4,777
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,864,876)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                               (,1864,876)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6117

MICHAEL EUGENE HUNT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JENNIFER J. KNOX, Wake County Trial Court Administrator,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:18-ct-03135-FL)

Submitted: May 23, 2019 Decided: May 29, 2019

Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Eugene Hunt, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Eugene Hunt appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). On appeal, we confine 

our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because 

the informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Hunt

has forfeited appellate review of the dismissal of his complaint.

*

 See Jackson v. Lightsey, 

775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under 

Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * We discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of Hunt’s motion 

for appointment of counsel. See Beaudett v. City of Hampton, 775 F.2d 1274, 1277 n.5 

(4th Cir. 1985) (providing standard).
EXHIBIT 32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of nFinanSe Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 2, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raymond P. Springer, in my capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Raymond P. SpringerDate:  November 12, 2010
Raymond P. Springer

Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2015007EN.01001001.xml

| 12.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 November 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Agenzia delle Dogane, Ufficio di Verona dell’Agenzia delle Dogane v ADL American Dataline Srl

(Case C-546/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Combined Nomenclature - Headings 8471 and 8518 - Loudspeakers reproducing sound by transforming an electromagnetic signal into sound waves, which can be connected only to a computer and marketed separately))

(2015/C 007/13)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Agenzia delle Dogane, Ufficio di Verona dell’Agenzia delle Dogane

Applicants:

Defendant: ADL American Dataline Srl

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2388/2000 of 13 October 2000, Commission Regulation (EC) No 2031/2001 of 6 August 2001, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1832/2002 of 1 August 2002 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1789/2003 of 11 September 2003, must be interpreted as meaning that goods such as those at issue in the main proceedings, which are connected to a computer equipped with the operating system ‘MAC OS 9’ or a more advanced system, must be classified as loudspeakers in subheading 8518 22 90 of that nomenclature.

---

(1)  OJ C 377, 21.12.2013.

1

---
No. 47140.

#### Protests 72614-K, etc., of Saji Trading Co., Ltd. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) Sugar and creamers, paperweights, trays, salt and peppers, etc., chiefly used in the kitchen or household or on the table for utilitarian purposes', at 40 percent under paragraph 339, following Abstracts 45228 and 45230; (2) sugar and creamers, paperweights, trays, salt and peppers, etc., chiefly used in the kitchen or household or on the table for utilitarian purposes, at 50 percent under paragraph 339 as table or household utensils plated with silver, *United States*v. *Friedlaender*(21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445) and Abstract 43521 followed; (3) trays composed in chief value of metal, .not plated, at 60 percent under paragraph 1552, as smokers’ articles. Abstract *50945556 followed; and (4) metal ships not plated, at 45 percent under paragraph 397 on the authority of Abstract 43785. Protests sustained in part.
No. 47083.

#### Protests 66160-K, etc., of Strauss-Eckardt Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial counsel agreed that certain merchandise described on the invoices as mouth organs is not chiefly used for the amusement of children but is in fact musical instruments. In accordance therewith the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 1541 (a) was sustained as to certain of these mouth organs.
Opinion issued February 7 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 8
- 00 689
- CV

——————————— MARKET
- TIERS, INC. D /B/A BLUE ENDO , Appellant V. TROKAMED GMBH , Appellee

On Appeal from the 243 rd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2016
- 60164



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant s , Market

- Tiers, Inc. d/b/a Blue Endo, Krista Macumber, and Justin Macumber, ha ve filed a “Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” No other party has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has issued. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.1 (a)(1), (c).2

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id. 42.1(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss a ny other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Lloyd , Kelly , and Hightower

.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 25758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10144]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1740-DR]


Indiana; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Indiana (FEMA-1740-DR), dated January 30, 2008, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: April 25, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Indiana is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of January 30, 2008.

    Benton, Carroll, Cass, DeKalb, Elkhart, Jasper, Kosciusko, 
Marshall, Newton, Noble, Pulaski, Starke, and White Counties for 
Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidential Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidential Declared 
Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and 
Households; 97.050 Presidential Declared Disaster Assistance to 
Individuals and Households--Other Needs, 97.036, Disaster Grants--
Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, 
Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
 [FR Doc. E8-10144 Filed 5-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report ofSouth Shore Resources Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period endedSeptember 30, 2007as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,Richard Wachter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   
| | 2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |   

Dated this 9thday of November, 2007.

RICHARD WACHTERRichard WachterChief Financial Officer



















---
No. 96-5512.

#### Davenport *v.*California.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Cer-tiorari denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133143 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133143 

 COA: 274378 

Schoolcraft CC: 06-006469-FH 

CURTIS LEE MARTIN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0521 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2007 

 Clerk