alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-8316-2] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), EPA gives notice of a meeting of the Gulf of Mexico Program (GMP) Citizens Advisory Committee  (CAC). 

                        For information on access or services for individuals with disabilities, please contact Gloria Car, U.S.EPA, at (228) 688-2421 or                         *car.gloria@epa.gov.*                         To request accommodation of a disability, please contact Gloria Car, preferably at least 10 days prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request.                     

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Tuesday, June 19, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Wednesday, June 20, 2007, from 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the River House, Stennis Space Center, Mississippi 39529, (228) 688-3726. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gloria D. Car, Designated Federal Officer, Gulf of Mexico Program Office, Mail Code EPA/GMPO, Stennis Space Center, MS 39529-6000 at (228) 688-2421. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The proposed agenda includes the following topics: Gulf of Mexico Program Updates; Presentation on Liquified Natural Gas Facilities; Nature Conservancy Presentation; Priority Interests of the Citizens Advisory Committee; Citizens Advisory Committee membership status. 

The meeting is open to the public. 

Dated: May 10, 2007. 

Gloria D. Car, 

Designated Federal Officer. 

 [FR Doc. E7-9505 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));                and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                |   |   |                                                                           |
|---------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |   |   | /s/ ROBERT                  T. FABER                                      |
|                     |   |   | Robert                    T. Faber*Chief                    Financial Officer* |
|                |   |   |                                                                           |
| September 21 , 2005 |   |   |                                                                           |

----
08/05/2015 11:34 KEN DANIEL 

J~\N'; KENNETH DANIEL, P.C. . . . .., i ~ .. _ ' ... 

N. KENNETH (KEN) DANIEL 

BY FACSIMILE~ TO: 

FAA DOCKET OPERATIONS 

(202) 493-2251 

ATTORNEY AT LAW 

3: 2~67 PROFESSIONAL PARKWAY 

AUGUSTA, GEORGIA 30907 

August 5~ 2015 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Re: Petition for Exemption of William Scott Robertson 

Federal Register No. 2015-17611 

Docket No. FAA-2015-2192 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

If AX)7068604757 

P.O. BOX 211790 

AUGUSTA, GEORGIA30917 

(706} 860-3747 

FAX 860-4757 

P.0011002 

Please consider this letter as my comment in support of the application of William Scott 

Robertson for his requested exemption from specified FAA regulations related to training and 

testing requirements for adding a multi-engine rating to his existing ATP certificate. Mr. 

Robertson's petition evidences that his educational background has provided training that likely 

greatly exceeds existing FAA requirements and to require Mr. Robertson to comply with the 

recently changed regulations which govern the addition of a multi-engine rating to an ATP 

certificate, would be essentially equivalent to requiring that Mr. Robertson duplicate educational 

training that he has already received as part of his undergraduate education at Embry-Riddle 

Aeronautical University. While clearly the FAA's obvious goal. of insuring that applicants 

seeking obtain a multi--engine rating for an ATP certificate meet minimum educational 

thresholds, is a commendable goal, applying the regulations in a way that essentially requires 

duplication of an applicant's previous studies makes no sense. Mr. Robertson's application for 

exemption clearly evidences that Mr. Robertson's educational background has provided him with 

education. training and experience which appear to greatly exceed existing regulatory 

requirements. To the extent the purpose of the regulations. from which Mr. Robertson seeks 

exemption~ is to insure that an applicant has met certain minimum educational thresholds, then 

Mr. Robertson's petition evidences compliance with such education~ thresholds and Mr. 

Robertson should not be required to spend the considerable time and resources that would be 

necessary to duplicate his existing educational training. This is the type waiver that should be 
08/05/2015 11:34 KEN DANIEL 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Page Two 

August 5, 2015 

(f AX)7068604757 P.002/002 

favorably considered by the FAA as it simply makes sense. Your favorable consideration of Mr. 

Robertson's exemption request is hereby urged. 

~u:._Q N. Kenneth Daniel
No. 40526.

#### Protest 961005-G/88043 of Moto Scoot Manufacturing Co. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of parts of motorcycles. The claim at 25 percent under paragraph 369 was therefore sustained.
No. 40541.

#### Protest 316436-G of N. Strauss & Sons, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of atomizers similar to those involved in. Rice v. *United States*(T. D. 49373). The claim as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained.
Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 
 CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT TO THE CONSULTING SERVICES
AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is made and entered into, as of the effective date set forth on the signature page hereof, by and between GTS Consulting, LLC (“GTS”) and ACE American Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania corporation
(“ACE”). 
 WHEREAS, Gary Schmalzriedt (“Executive”) and ACE previously entered into a Consulting Services Agreement
dated October 1, 2006 (the “Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Executive and ACE intend to amend the Agreement as set forth
below; and 
 WHEREAS, to induce GTS to execute this Amendment to continue Executive’s services as a consultant, the parties desire to
enter into a written Amendment to the Agreement; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, and other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: 
 1. All
references to “September 30, 2007” are hereby changed to read “September 30, 2008” throughout the Agreement. 
 2.
Paragraph 5 is amended to read in relevant part (subparagraphs (c), (d) and (e) remain unchanged): 
 Consideration. As consideration for
the GTS’s performance of the Consulting Services from October 1, 2007 through September 30, 2008, ACE shall compensate the Executive as follows: 
  

	 	a.	GTS will receive a total of $50,000 for time worked on the Consulting Services during the term of the Agreement, plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses of Executive, which are
approved, documented, and consistent with Employer’s Travel and Expense Policy; 

  

	 	b.	fees for Consulting Services and expenses will be paid on a quarterly basis in 4 equal installments of $12,500; 

 3. All other provisions of the Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement intending to be legally bound as of the
effective date set forth below. 
  

			
	GTS CONSULTING, LLC
	
	  

	Gary T. Schmalzriedt, President
	
	ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
	
	  

	Phillip B. Cole, Global Human Resource Officer
		
	Effective Date:
Exhibit 31(i)
                                                                   -------------

                                  Certification

I, J. Allen Fine, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Investors Title Company;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we
     have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     b) {Reserved}

     c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
     disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
     this report based on such evaluation; and

     d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2004

/s/ J. Allen Fine
-----------------
J. Allen Fine
Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 25754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10013]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Initial Review 
Group; Subcommittee F--Manpower & Training; NCI-F Manpower and 
Training Grants.
    Date: May 19, 2008.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Old Town Alexandria, 1767 King Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314.
    Contact Person: Lynn M. Amende, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Resources and Training Review Branch, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive 
Blvd., Room 8105, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-4759, 
[email protected].
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 30, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
 [FR Doc. E8-10013 Filed 5-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 145 (Tuesday, July 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19879]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-143-005]


TCP Gathering Co.; Notice of Tariff Filing

July 23, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 18, 1997 TCP Gathering Co. (TCP) tendered 
for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the 
following revised tariff sheet, to be effective August 1, 1997:

Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 103

    TCP states that this sheet is being filed to adopt, in the August 
1, 1997 effective sheet, the changes recently approved in the 
Commission's July 2, 1997 letter order in Docket No. RP97-143-003 
incorporating certain Order No. 587 GISB standards to be effective June 
1, 1997.
    TCP states that copies of the filing were served upon TCP's 
jurisdictional customers, interested public bodies, and all parties to 
the proceedings.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such protests 
must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. All protests filed with the Commissions will be considered 
by it in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not 
serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-19879 Filed 7-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 6128.

#### ELI JONES vs. TAXI CAB CO., OF NEW ORLEANS.

On Motion to Dismiss.

Syllabus.

One cannot do indirectly, what he cannot do directly.

Appeal from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Division “D,” No. 103,686. Hon Porter Parker, Judge.'

H. Kenner, for plaintiff and appellant.

Dupre & Dupre for defendant and appellee.

W. W. Bond, attorney.

His Honor, JOHN ST. PAUL,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

Plaintiff sued for' $2,500, and his claim was rejected. After judgment he entered a remittitur for all his claim in excess of $2000, and obtained an appeal to this Court.

*306Opinion and decree, June 1st, 1914.

Rehearing,refused, June 15th, 1914.

Writ denied, October 26th, 1914.

■ The general rule is that a remittitur after judgment cannot affect the jurisdiction on appeal, which is fixed at the time of judgment.

34 An:, 865.

But plaintiff bases his right of appeal to this ¡Court upon certain expressions in 123 La., p. 41, and upon a distinction which he draws between a remittitur and an admission that his claim is excessive.

As the expression in 123 La., p. 41, is purely obiter, and in conflict with the general rule we shall not follow it. As to the distinction attempted by plaintiff it is obvious that if allowed, a plaintiff might always accomplish indirectly by an admission what he cannot accomplish directly by remittitur, to-wit, divert the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court which attached at the moment of judgment.

Whether or not that Court in the exercise of its jurisdiction, will dismiss the appeal or retransfer the case, is a matter-in which this Court iv> not concerned.

It is therefore ordered that this appeal be transferred to the Supreme Court of 'Louisiana upon appellant or his attorney of,record making out and filing his affidavit that the appeal was not taken for delay and lodging a transcript of appeal in the Supreme Court within 30 days after this judgment becomes final.
No. 47780.

#### Protests 986213-G, etc., of Heinsheimer Bros., Inc. (New York).

*458Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 47291 the claim at only 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was sustained.
January 26, 1961

Reap. Dec. 9908.

#### Bernhard Altmann Vienna, Inc., and Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. *v.*United States,

reappraisement R59/13697, etc.

Entered at New York, N.Y. Reap. Dec. 9795. Motion by plaintiffs.
No. 47058.

#### Protests 2442-K, etc., of Porto Rico Iron Works (San Juan)

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the secretary of the plaintiff company testified that the merchandise consisted of broken pieces of machinery purchased from sugar manufacturers in the Virgin Islands; that prior to becoming scrap the material consisted of couplings and roll shells (cylinders used to grind sugar cane); that the company had reduced the material to the condition of scrap at their sugar factory, and that iron and scrap brass imported contained no identifying •marks that would indicate the origin of the machinery from which the scrap was derived. No evidence was produced to establish the claim for free entry as American goods returned. It was not shown, in accordance with the requirements of said section 1394, that the imported material is the growth or product of the Virgin Islands or that it was manufactured in the Virgin Islands from material the growth or product of such Islands, or the United States, or both. Neither was it shown that the materials used do not contain more than a total value of 20 percent of foreign materials upon which no drawback has been allowed. The court was unable to find anything in the record sufficient to overcome the correctness of the classification of the collector. Judgment was therefore entered in favor of the Government.
# C_2013171EN.01001903.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/19

---

Action brought on 5 April 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-169/13)

2013/C 171/39

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: N. Yerrell and J. Hottiaux, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Poland

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to ensure the application of Directive 2002/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities, (1) with regard to self-employed drivers, and in any event by not notifying the Commission of those provisions, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2(1), 3 to 7 and 11 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to ensure the application of Directive 2002/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities, (1) with regard to self-employed drivers, and in any event by not notifying the Commission of those provisions, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2(1), 3 to 7 and 11 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Directive 2002/15/EC has been applicable to self-employed drivers since 23 March 2009.

---

(1)  OJ 2002 L 80, p. 35.

1

---
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the use in MDS Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 40-F of our report dated December 14, 2005 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of MDS Inc. for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.  We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-12056, 333-12058, 333-12548, and 333-13538) of our report dated December 14, 2005 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of MDS Inc.for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 included in the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended October 31, 2005.



|Toronto, Canada,
January 27, 2006. | Chartered Accountants
|---------------------------------- | ---------------------
No. 42101.

#### Protests 938044-G, etc., of Latorraca Bros. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On the authority of Abstract 40880 the protests were sustained.