alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 06- 14 -00044- CR

ERIC L. HILL COURT OF CRIMINAL VS. OF APPEALS THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS

APPELLANT ’S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW COMES NOW Eric L. Hill , A ppellant, and moves this Court pursuant to Tex. R. App. Proc. 10.5 and 68.2(c) for and extension of fifteen (15 ) day’s or until February 23, 2015 , in which to file the Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review herein. In support, Appellant would show the following;
1. Appellant was convicted of Continuance Violence against Family

. 2. On February 26, 2014, Appellant was found guilty by a jury and the jury assessed a sentence of twenty-seven (27) years confinement in prison.
3. The Sixth Court of Appeals issued its opinion on January 9, 20 14 , in which it affirmed the Appellant’s conviction. Said cas e is styled PD-0165-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 2/11/2015 2:32:56 PM Accepted 2/12/2015 9:25:12 AM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERKEric L. Hill v. The State of Texas, Appellate Case Number 06

- 14

- 00044

- CR, Trial Court Case Number 43,089

- B

. 4. This is the first request for extension of t ime. 5. Appellant req ues t s a n extension until February 23, 2015

. 6. Good cause exists for the granting of the motion: Appellant’s attorney was preparing for jury tria ls in the 115 th District Court of Upshur County for the two week jury session beginning January 12, 2015: State v. Carlos Bunch, Jr. Cause Number 12503; State v. Alton Ray Easley, Jr., Cause Numbers 16346, 16499, and 16647; State v. David Bruce Williams, C ause Number 16580; State v. Ronald Ray Hohensee, Cause Number 16696; State v. Mary Ellen Clark, Cause Number 16723; State v. Christopher Alan Ray, Cause Number 16784; State v. Cortney Lee Fields, Cause Number 16828; State v. Megan Malota, Cause Number 1686 1; State v. Kelly Wayne Haney, Caus e Number 16881; and State v. Le ster Shane Browning, Cause Number 16875.Further, Appellant ’ s atto rney was preparing for a jury trial in the 124 th District Court of Gregg County for the week of January 26, 2015: State v. Jeremy Scott, Cause Number 43,891

- B. Further, Appellant ’ s attorney has recently submitted briefs to the SixthCourt of Appeals in the following cases: State v. Casey Dale Hammack, Case Number 06

- 14

- 00175

- CR and State v. Cory Martin Colvin, Case Number 06

- 14

- 00163

- CR

. 7. This motion is not sought for purposes of delay, but so that justice may b e done. Therefore, Appe llant r equests until February 23,
2015 , in which to complete his Petition for Discretionary Review. Respectfully submitted, /s/Tim Cone

_ _____________________ Tim Cone, Attorney at Law State Bar No. 04660350 P.O. Box 413 Gilmer, Texas 75644 Tel: (903) 725

- 6270 Fax: (903) 725

- 5494 e - mail:timcone6@aol.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE A true and correct copy of the foregoing document has been delivered to all counsel of record, o n this the 11th day of February, 2015

. /s/Tim Cone

_______________________ Tim Cone, Attorney at Law
No. 46541.

#### Protest 821441-G of Schermerhorn Bros. Co. (Portland, Oreg.).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

The report of the Government chemist showed thj3.-sample to .be hemp. The collector’s classification as hemp tow was therefore affirmed.
Before the Second Division,

November 1, 1943

No. 48931.

#### Protests 921437-G, etc., of Aoki Taiseido Book Co. (San Francisco) .

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise in question is in all material respects the same as that passed upon in *Aoki Taiseido Book Co.*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 221, C. D. 467) the claim for free entry under paragraph 1630 was sustained.
Case No. 5,650.

#### GRACE v. EVANS.

[3 Ben. 479.] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

Nov., 1869.

Arrest in Admiraltt — Bail—Attachment.

1. The proper form of stipulation to be given for the discharge of a party arrested in a suit in admiralty, is for the appearance of the party to abide by the decree of the court in the cause, and not for the payment of the sum decreed.

2. Where a warrant of arrest was issued, with a clause directing the marshal, if the respondent could not be found, to attach his property, and the marshal returned that he had arrested the respondent, and had attached his property: *Held,*that the attachment must be set aside. .

. In this case, a libel was filed [by William L. Grace against Joseph Evans], alleging that the defendant, a master of a vessel, had sold cargo on board her belonging to the li-bellant, and had brought the proceeds to this port, and had refused to pay them over to libellant On this, an order was made that the respondent be arrested and held to bail. A warrant was accordingly issued against him, with a clause providing that if he was not found, the marshal was to attach his property or credits and effects. The marshal returned that he had arrested the respondent, and had also attached his credits and effects. The respondent thereupon tendered a stipulation, with sufficient surety, conditioned that the respondent should appear in court, to abide by the decree of the court in the cause. Objection was taken, on behalf of the libellant, that the stipulation ought to be, that the respondent should pay the amount decreed against him. The respondent also claimed that the attachment should be set aside, on the ground that the process only directed the service of .the attachment, in case the respondent could not be found, and that, inasmuch as the marshal had arrested the respondent, and held him in custody, he had no authority to attach his property.

T. Scudder, for libellant.

C. Van Santvoord and It. D. Benedict, for respondent.

THE COURT

(BLATCHFORD, District Judge)

held, that the libellant had no right to any further security than that which was offered by the respondent; and, on the filing of the stipulation offered, ordered the arrest and the attachment to be discharged.
exv10w6b



 





Exhibit 10.6B




August [__], 2007




SONICS, INC.




NOTICE OF ACCELERATION OF STOCK OPTION VESTING




To: [Name of Optionee]




     Sonics, Inc. (the “Company”) is pleased to announce that in the event of certain transactions
of the Company, we will partially accelerate the vesting of certain outstanding stock options
granted to you pursuant to the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1997 Plan”) and/or the 2007 Stock
Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). Effective as of August 22, 2007, in the event of a Corporate
Transaction (as defined in each plan) and you are an executive officer of the Company at the time
of such Corporate Transaction, for the portion of your stock option that is Assumed (as defined in
each plan), fifty percent (50%) of such Assumed portion of the outstanding and unvested stock
options will become vested and exercisable (the “Stock Options”) immediately upon termination of
your Continuous Service (as defined in each plan) by the Company (or its successor) other than for
Cause (as defined in each plan) or upon your termination of Continuous Service for Good Reason (as
defined in each plan) within six (6) months after such Corporate Transaction. For the portion of
your Stock Options that is not Assumed, fifty percent (50%) of the such portion of the Stock
Options that is outstanding and unvested will become vested and exercisable immediately prior to
the effective date of any such Corporate Transaction.



     Except for the partial acceleration of vesting, your Stock Options will be governed by their
original terms and conditions. This Notice amends and supersedes any other document, agreement or
arrangement, which includes, but is not limited to, any offer letter, bonus plan or other prior to
communication (the “Prior Documents”), that provides for partial accelerated vesting with respect
to a change in control, merger or acquisition or in the event of an initial public offering of the
Company’s common stock. The partial acceleration of vesting with respect to your eligible options
will occur automatically if there is a Corporate Transaction and no action is required on your
part. You will not receive any additional documentation in connection with this partial
acceleration of vesting of your eligible stock options and therefore we recommend that you retain
this Notice for your records.



     Questions relating to this Notice should be directed to:



[contact person]

Sonics, Inc.

[address]

phone: (___) ___- ___

e-mail: [___]



     We appreciate your continued efforts on behalf of the Company. This additional vesting
acceleration feature of your eligible stock options should improve your opportunity to share in the
growth in value of the Company as we continue to build our business and in the event that the
Company is acquired.



SONICS, INC.




1
No. 96-5315.

#### Taylor *v.*Texas.

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certio-rari denied.
#### Michael T. FAIRCLOTH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 97-3027.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 28, 1998.

Michael T. Faireloth, Punta Gorda, pro se.

Bradley R. Bischoff, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED without prejudice to appellant’s filing a petition for writ of mandamus in Leon County.

STONE, C.J., and DELL and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
(Reap. Dec. 9721)

#### D. Hauser, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry. Nos. 713969; 730150.

(Decided June 2, 1960)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Dowd,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The proper dutiable value for valuation purposes is the subject of the above-enumerated appeals for a reappraisement.

The parties hereto have stipulated and agreed that on or about the date of the exportation of the instant steel wood screws exported from Germany such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption in the country of exportation and that the price at the time of exportation of the merchandise in issue at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Germany, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the entered value.

Upon the agreed facts of record,-1 find, and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. §1402(d)), is the proper basis for determining the value of the steel wood screws in issue and that said value is represented by the entered value.

As to all other merchandise, the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STERLING
DRILLING FUND 1983-1 FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         126,703
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,368
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               167,071
<PP&E>                                       9,255,398
<DEPRECIATION>                              (7,898,828)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,523,641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,523,641<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,523,641
<SALES>                                        260,987<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               260,987
<CGS>                                          319,634
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  319,634
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,647)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (5.87)<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>OTHER - SE IS COMPOSED OF PARTNERSHIP EQUITY.
<F2>THE SALES LINE INCLUDES 5,780 OF NET INTEREST INCOME AND 3,000 OF SETTLED CLAIMS.
<F3>EPS - PRIMARY IS BASED UPON LIMITED PARTNERS SHARE OF NET INCOME DIVIDED BY THE
OUTSTANDING PARTNERSHIP UNITS OF 11,077.
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.01





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of PDF Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 10, 2011 (the “Report”), I, John K. Kibarian, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ JOHN K. KIBARIANJohn K. KibarianPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 Date: May 10, 2011
No. 96-5929.

#### Egbert *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT32.02**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of PDF Solutions, Inc., or the Company, on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on May 11, 2009, or the Report, I, Keith A. Jones,Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
|     | /s/ KEITH A. JONES                                       |
|----------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|     | Keith A. Jones                                           |
| * * | *Chief Financial Officer and Vice  President of Finance* |
| * * | *(Principal Financial**Officer)*                         |

 

Date: May 11, 2009

 

----
#### John D. PEET, Jr., et al. v. James A. PEET et al.

No. 49357.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 2, 1977.

W. E. Gore, Jr., Jackson, for appellants.

Wise, Carter, Child, Steen & Caraway, William 0. Carter, Jr., Jackson, for appel-lees.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Hinds County; J. C. Stennett, Chancellor.

Before PATTERSON, P. J., and ROBERTSON and BROOM, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2278 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2278

   To provide for an exemption for community banks to certain escrow 
  requirements under the Truth in Lending Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 2012

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for an exemption for community banks to certain escrow 
  requirements under the Truth in Lending Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESCROW REQUIREMENTS EXEMPTION FOR COMMUNITY BANKS.

    Section 129D(c) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1639d(c)) is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (4) as 
        subparagraphs (A) through (D), respectively, and moving the 
        margins 2 ems to the right;
            (2) by striking ``The Bureau'' and inserting the following:
            ``(1) In general.--The Bureau''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Treatment of loans held by smaller institutions.--The 
        Bureau shall, by regulation, exempt from the requirements of 
        subsection (a) any loan secured by a first lien on the 
        principal dwelling of a consumer, if such loan is held by an 
        insured depository institution having assets of $10,000,000,000 
        or less.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATIONS

I, Winston Johnson, the principal executive and financial officer, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Media and Entertainment.com Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) * for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

*;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date:

August 6, 2004

/s/ Winston Johnson

Winston Johnson

Principal executive and financial officer





* Indicates material omitted in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33-8238; 34-47986.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Leveraging Theater Assets for Long Term Sustainability

By  1LT Clark Chen

                KADENA AIR BASE, Japan  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled VehicleHMMWVconstruction equipmentequipmentdisposition1st Air Defense Artillery RegimentvehiclescargotransportationDistribution
No. 46555.

#### Protests 959800-G, etc., of Atlas Marine Supply Co. et al. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the drums in question are. similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Atlas Marine Supply Co.*v. *United States*(29 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 165). In accordance therewith the claim for free entry was therefore sustained.. -