alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Docket No. 

## FAA~:LOIO-/2

## '1>0 Regulatory Evaluation 

## ;;<O/O~-IvM-;).70-AD Directorate Identifier: -AD Ifyou make changes to the \;alues in ,he fahfe below, you mliSI ensure I!le totals update accordingly. If {hey do 1101.click (or Tab) illio ami/hen oul of tIlt!changed cell. Estimated Costs: Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, Action orooeIlcr, aooliance) (e.g., Inspection, Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor + U.S. for u.s. Fleet

access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered and close-un) our) Products Inspection 1.0 

# , " $0 

## , 683 ,

.



# .

..



## . .

. . " 

### .,'

"



## .

## '. 

# .. ;' ~ 

## ,

, 

## ...

. 

## , The known number of oroducts in comoliance: Total Costs of comolia nee for U.S. fleet: $58,055 Costs covered under warranty (ifknown) $ Special considerations far Economic Analysis (Use thisfield to explain anything in (he Estimated CoSfSfable that WQ.l' assumed ormighl nOIbe obvious. Thisfield can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

### Te cost shown is cost per inspection cycle. Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? ,._ 

### YEs'D NO

## IZJ +Explanation:DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Isthe AD significant? YEs'D NO

## [81 *Explanation: Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer.

_ 

### YESD NO

## [81 Explanation: Intrastate Aviation inAlaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation inAlaska. Is itappropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransportation? ~ 

### YES'D NO

## [81 *Explanation:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Huifeng Bio-Pharmaceutical Technology,
Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of, I, Jing’an Wang, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
August 16, 2010





/S/
      Jing’an WangJing’an
      Wang
                Chief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)
No. 47766.

#### Protest 889483-G of J. Milton Hagy Waste Works (St. Louis).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following *United States*v. *Schapiro*(24 C. C. P. A. 343, T. D. 48771) the wiping rags in question were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1750 in accordance with the facts as set forth in stipulation entered into between counsel.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2175 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2175

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 to 
provide for the trial of covered persons detained in the United States 
 pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force and to repeal 
                 the requirement for military custody.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 8, 2012

  Mr. Udall of Colorado introduced the following bill; which was read 
         twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 to 
provide for the trial of covered persons detained in the United States 
 pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force and to repeal 
                 the requirement for military custody.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Due Process and Military Detention 
Amendments Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. DISPOSITION OF COVERED PERSONS DETAINED IN THE UNITED STATES 
              PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE.

    Section 1021 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2012 is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c), by striking ``The disposition'' and 
        inserting ``Except as provided in subsection (g), the 
        disposition''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Disposition of Covered Persons Detained in the United 
States.--In the case of a covered person who is detained in the United 
States pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force, 
disposition under the law of war shall only mean the transfer of the 
person for trial and proceedings by a court established under Article 
III of the Constitution of the United States or by an appropriate State 
court. Such trial and proceedings shall have all the due process as 
provided for under the Constitution of the United States.''.

SEC. 3. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR MILITARY CUSTODY.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2012 is hereby repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1029(b) of such Act is amended 
by striking ``applies to'' and all that follows through ``any other 
person'' and inserting ``applies to any person''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Natural Gas, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Qinan Ji, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
September 30, 2010





/s/
      Qinan JiQinan
      Ji, Principal Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that th i s

opinion s h ould not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-30946

K. TRACY BERGQUIST, ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND ALL OTHER SHAREHOLDERS OF FyBX CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus FyBX CORPORATION; MICHAEL P. ARATA; HOFFMAN, SIEGEL, SEYDEL, BIENVENU, CENTOLA & CORDES, A PROFESSIONAL LAW FIRM; BORDELON, HAMLIN AND THERIOT, Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-CV-722-R

Before JOLLY, DAVIS and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

The court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs, oral arguments, and pertinent portions of the
record. Having done so, we find no reversible error of fact or law
in the district court’s disposition of this case. We also find
that the district court did not err or ab use its discretion in regard to the challenged discovery rul ings. Finally, Bergquist2

raised no genuine issue of material fact concerning whether the
Bordelon firm represented FyBX Corporation at any time after February 15, 1996, when Arata left the firm. Accordingly, we

AFFIRM the judgment for essentially the re asons stated by the
district court.

The motion of Appellee FyBX Corporation for sanctions and
costs is DENIED.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTION FOR SANCTIONS DENIED

.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Sterling Drilling Fund 1983-1 (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Charles E. Drimal Jr., Chief Executive Officer of PrimeEnergy Management
Corporation, the Managing General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Partnership.



/s/ Charles E. Drimal Jr.
-------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
March 28, 2002
#### Nathan Goldstein et al., Appellants, v St. John’s Episcopal Hospital et al., Respondents.

[701 NYS2d 111]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), dated August 24, 1998, which granted the separate motions of the defendant St. John’s Episcopal Hospital and the defendants Charles Bleifeld and Kevin Vesey for leave to amend their respective answers to add the affirmative defense of lack of capacity to sue, and for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

This medical malpractice action arises out of a knee replacement surgery performed upon the plaintiff Nathan Goldstein by the defendants Charles Bleifeld and Kevin Vesey at the defendant St. John’s Episcopal Hospital in January 1992. In October 1992, the plaintiffs filed for bankruptcy but failed to list any medical malpractice claim as an asset in their bankruptcy petition. The plaintiffs were discharged in bankruptcy in 1993 and in 1994 they commenced the instant action. Four years later, the defendants separately moved for leave to amend their answers to assert as an affirmative defense the *427plaintiffs’ lack of capacity to sue, and for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. The Supreme Court granted the motions.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendants leave to amend their answers. Leave to amend a pleading should be freely given (see, CPLR 3025 [b]) provided the amendment is not defective on its face and does not prejudice or surprise the opposing party (see, *Smith v Peterson Trust,*254 AD2d 479; *see also, Romeo v Arrigo,*254 AD2d 270). Here, the defendants moved promptly for leave to amend their answers upon learning of the prior bankruptcy proceeding, and the plaintiffs were unable to show any surprise or prejudice (see, *Quiros v Polow,*135 AD2d 697). Having failed to list the medical malpractice cause of action in the schedule of assets filed with the bankruptcy court, the plaintiffs lacked the capacity to sue (see, *Pinto v Ancona,*262 AD2d 472; *Bromley v Fleet Bank,*240 AD2d 611; *Reynolds v Blue Cross,*210 AD2d 619; *Quiros v Polow, supra).*Accordingly, the defendants were entitled to summary judgment. Sullivan, J. P., Joy, Krausman and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Scenario SO2 NOx PM Pre-control days >0.5Post-control

days >0.5 ∆days Pre-control days >1.0 Post-control

days >1.0 ∆days Precontrol No control No control Existing Fabric Filter 55 --- --- 15 --- --- Control 8 Dry FGD 95% SOFA + SCR Existing Fabric Filter 55 1 54 15 0 15 Derived from Appendix A of Otter Tail Power Company Big Stone Generating Station Unit 1 Best Available Retrofit Technology Analysis, November 2, 2009 **Big Stone I Unit 1 - Days > 0.5 dv and >1.0 dv** Class I Area - Boundary Waters Control Option 3-year totals 3-year totals

Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Carreker Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending January 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John D. Carreker, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/JOHN D. CARREKER, JR.John D. Carrker, Jr., Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

Dated:
April 30, 2003

---

QuickLinks
Before the Third Division,

October 22, 1943

No. 48912.

#### Protests 102506-K, etc., of Continental Grain Co. et al. (Cleveland and Portland, Oreg.).

*296Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
February 26, 1940

No. 43284.

Suit 4235.

#### United *States*v. *R. E. Macksoud et al.*

Abstract 39981 affirmed. C. A. D. 87.
No. 47089.

#### Protests 979833-G, etc., of Calvaire, Inc. (New York).

*495Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with the record presented woven mufflers, hemmed, wholly or in chief value of silk, were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1209, and those valued at more than $5 per dozen, hemmed but not block-printed by hand, were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 1209 and T. D. 49753.
No. 74-900.

#### City of Parma, Ohio *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari and other relief denied.
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 

 

Nobel Learning Communities, Inc. 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-3793, 333-3797 and 333-73496) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-61372, 333-61374 and 333-64701) of Nobel LearningCommunities, Inc. of our report dated September 9, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

BDO Seidman, LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

September 14, 2004
EXHIBIT
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**





**18
      U.S.C. 1350,**





**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**





**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of nFinanSe Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raymond P.
      Springer, in my capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














***/s/
                Raymond P. Springer***Date:   May
                11, 2007
            Raymond
                P. Springer
              Chief
                Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-41995 of HalifaxCorporation and subsidiaries on Form S-8 pertaining to the Halifax Corporation 1994 Key EmployeeStock Option Plan and Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan of our report dated June 14, 2004(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to theadoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other IntangibleAssets, effective April 1, 2002), with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of HalifaxCorporation as of March 31, 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations,stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the two years in the period then endedappearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Halifax Corporation and subsidiaries for the yearended March 31, 2005.
/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP
McLean, VirginiaJuly 5, 2005
**RECEIVING W ATER CONCENTRA**  **TION C AL**  **CULA TION** 

**Calculation of PMN substance released customer/y ear**  **Calculation of PMN substance in receiving w aters**
# C_2015046EN.01001302.xml

| 9.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 December 2014 — Kingdom of Spain v European Commission

(Case C-513/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Cohesion Fund - Project concerning the drainage and purification of the urban water of Zaragoza (Spain) - Reduction in the financial assistance - Existence of a time-limit - Failure to comply with the prescribed time-limit - Consequences))

(2015/C 046/17)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Rubio González, Agent)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Valero Jordana and A. Steiblytė, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Case T-358/08 Spain v Commission; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Case T-358/08 Spain v Commission;

| 2. | Annuls Commission decision C(2008) 3249 of 25 June 2008, relating to a reduction of the aid granted by virtue of the Cohesion Fund to the Kingdom of Spain for project No 96/11/61/018 — ‘Saneamiento de Zaragoza’; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls Commission decision C(2008) 3249 of 25 June 2008, relating to a reduction of the aid granted by virtue of the Cohesion Fund to the Kingdom of Spain for project No 96/11/61/018 — ‘Saneamiento de Zaragoza’;

| 3. | Orders the Commission to pay the costs incurred by the Kingdom of Spain and declares that the Commission is to bear its own costs both in the proceedings at first instance and in the present appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs incurred by the Kingdom of Spain and declares that the Commission is to bear its own costs both in the proceedings at first instance and in the present appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 336, 16.11.2013.

1

---
#### Charles Dibble, Plaintiff in Error vs. the Jacksonville and Alligator Plank Road Company, Defendant in Error.

Writ of Error to a Judgment of Duval County Circuit Dourt.

*McQueen McIntosh*for Plaintiff in Error.

*G. W. Call, Jr.,*for Defendant in Error.

DuPONT, J.,

This case is similar in all respects to the case of Joseph A Barbee, (except that one instalment had been paid in, which makes it yet a stronger case,) decided at the present term, and will abide the decision in that case.

Therefore let the Judgment be affirmed with costs.
Exhibit 32.1

                          INTRAOP MEDICAL CORPORATION

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intraop Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John P. Powers, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                              /s/   John P. Powers
                                            ----------------------------------
                                              John P. Powers
                                              Chief Executive Officer

                                              Date:  February 12, 2010


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Intraop Medical Corporation and will be retained by Intraop Medical
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));                and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |                                                                                                                            |                                   |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |                                                                                                                            |  /s/              ROBERT T. FABER |
|                                   | Robert                T. Faber*President                and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial                Officer* |
| May              15,              2006 |                                                                                                                            |

----