alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Sc[HVUNVWS

LNI L JVNOIJLVNN

.40 NOIJLdOUV

EE-DET-94-101 COMMENT 07

;,.... . 

'f " (_ 

,'; " 

, 

, , 

. ADOPTION OF , 

INTERNATIONAL 

STANDARDS 
ISSUES

APRIL 19 9 4, ARI SECTION VOTED TO PURSUE

ADOPTION OF I'SO STANDARD

• WILL NEW DESCRIPTORS FOR STANDARDS BE

REQUIRED?

- IMPACT OF USING METRIC UNITS

SHOULD SEER AND HSPF BE DROPPED?

• THE LAW REQUIRES DOE TO PROVIDE A METHOD TO

DETERMINE ANNUAL OPERATING COSTS . HOW CAN

THIS BE ACCOMPLISHED?

EE-DET-94-101 COMMENT 07

ISSUES 

.,:~_ A-PRIL 1994, ARI SECTION VOTED TO PURSUE 

ADOPTION OF ISO STANDARD' 

· WILL NEW DESCRIPTORS FOR STANDARDS BE 

REQUIRED? 

- IMPACT OF USING METRIC UNITS 

- _ SHOULD SEER AND HS'PF BE DRO'PPED? 

· THE LAW REQUIRES DOE TO PROVIDE A METHOD TO 

DETERMINE ANNUAL OPERATING COSTS. HOW CAN 

THIS BE ACCOMPLISHED?
No. 40485.

#### Protests 166351-G, etc., of Henry Kayser & Fils, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel eellulosic material in the form of filaments and cellulose filaments in the form of single or double yarns were held dutiable at 40 cents per pound under paragraph 31. Abstract 38956 and *Weinman*v. *United States*(T. D. 49408) followed.
----

**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coventure International  Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB for  the six month period ending January 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and  Exchange Commission (the “Report”), John Hromyk, Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant  to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that  to his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

*/s/ John Hromyk                           *  John Hromyk  Chief Executive Officer/Chief  Financial Officer  March 22, 2005 

 [A signed original of this written statement required by Section  906 has been provided to Coventure International Inc. and will be retained by  Coventure International Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission  or its staff upon request.]

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 4.12

PROMISSORY NOTE

|         |  |                                      
|-------- |  | -------------------------------------
|$310,000 |  | October 13, 1998
Alexandria, Virginia

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, a Virginia corporation (the
Borrower) hereby promises to pay to the order of RESEARCH INDUSTRIES
INCORPORATED, a Virginia corporation (the Lender), at 123 North Pitt Street,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314, or such other location as the holder hereof may in
writing designate, the principal sum of THREE HUNDRED AND TEN THOUSAND AND NO/00
DOLLARS ($310,000), in lawful money of the United States of America in
immediately available funds, on January 11, 1999, without defense, offset or
counterclaim, together with interest on the unpaid principal amount hereof, at
such office, in like money and funds, from the date hereof at the rate of eight
(8) per cent per annum.

This Note is subject to the terms and conditions of the Subordination
Agreement dated January 27, 1998 entered into by and among Research Industries
Incorporated, Crestar Bank and Halifax Corporation.

This Note is one of two Notes referred to in the Loan Agreement between
the Borrower and the Lender dated October 8, 1998.

The Borrower hereby waives presentment, demand, notice of dishonor,
protest and all other demands and notices in connection with the delivery,
acceptance, performance and enforcement of this Note. Lender shall be entitled
to recover any costs and reasonable attorneys fees incurred in the collection
of this Note.

This Note may be prepaid at anytime without penalty.

This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
of the Commonwealth of Virginia, without reference to conflict of laws
principles.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower has caused this note to be executed by
its duly authorized President as of the day and year first above written.

| |                                           
| | ------------------------------------------
| | BORROWER                                  
|
| | HALIFAX CORPORATION
a Virginia Corporation
|
| | By:  /s/  HOWARD C. MILLS                 
| |                                           
| | Name:  Howard C. Mills
Title: President
Exhibit 23.2


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


      We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-66620), (No. 333-66123), (No. 333-66121), (No.
333-66119) and (No. 033-63865) of ATC Healthcare, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our
report dated May 12, 2003, except for the fifth paragraph of Note 7(a) as to
which the date is June 13, 2003, relating to the financial statements and
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.


                                                      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                                  /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Melville, New York
November 3, 2004


                                       41
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2389 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 509
112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2389

 To deem the submission of certain claims to an Indian Health Service 
                     contracting officer as timely.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mr. Begich (for himself, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Tester, and Mr. Crapo) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                      Committee on Indian Affairs

                           September 13, 2012

                Reported by Mr. Akaka, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To deem the submission of certain claims to an Indian Health Service 
                     contracting officer as timely.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TIMELY SUBMISSION OF CERTAIN CLAIMS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a claim submitted to an 
Indian Health Service contracting officer pursuant to the Indian Self-
Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.) on 
or before October 31, 2005, involving a claim that accrued after 
October 1, 1995, and on or before September 30, 1999, shall be deemed 
to be timely submitted.
                                                       Calendar No. 509

112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2389

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To deem the submission of certain claims to an Indian Health Service 
                     contracting officer as timely.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 13, 2012

                       Reported without amendment
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350)





I,
      Thomas
      W. Martin, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of ICON Capital
      Corp., the General Partner of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly
      Report of ICON Income Fund Eight B L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q/A
      for
      the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m);
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the Partnership.








*Dated:
      December 11, 2007*





*/s/
      Thomas W. Martin*


Thomas
      W.
      Martin


Chairman,
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the General Partner


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


ICON
      Capital Corp.


General
      Partner of ICON Income Fund Eight B L.P.
Before the Second Division,

November 30, 1942

No. 47757.

#### Protests 762262-G, etc., of Louis Marbe Cohn, et al (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The case was submitted on a stipulation between counsel that the merchandise in question consists of “8-Bu. paper hats,” known as harvest hats, similar to those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). The protests were sustained to that extent.
#### MACALESTER v. WISTAR.

November 11, 1837.

*Rule to show cause why the fieri facias, levy, and sheriff's sale should not be set aside.*

Under the 44th section of the act of 16th June, 1836, relating to executions, a levy and sale on a *fieri facias,*without a condemnation, of a defendant’s remainder in fee of a lot of ground after an existing life-estate of another in the same, is good.

A *FIERI FACIAS*had issued in the case upon a judgment which bore date since the execution act of 16th June, 1836, came into operation. The defendant being entitled to the remainder in fee of a lot of ground after the life-estate of his mother, the plaintiff directed the sheriff to sell the same on a *fieri facias,*without a previous condemnation.

*Italy,*for defendant,

whilst he admitted that under the act of 1705, this proceeding would have been regular, questioned its legality since the passing of the act of 16th June, 1836. He cited the 44th section of that act, *(Pitrd. Dig.*373,) which he argued was imperative in requiring an inquest to be held in every case where real estate was levied upon.

C. *Ingersoll,*contra.

Per Curiam.—

The new act has made no change in this respect. The language of the 44th section which has been quoted, is, it is true, as broad as possible,: but the duties of the inquest are to ascertain whether the rents and profits of the estate levied upon, will be sufficient to satisfy within seven years the judgment upon which the execution has issued, and when, as in this case, there can be no rents and profits as to the *interest*of the defendant taken in execution, there is no duty to be performed by the inquest. An inquest at best, therefore, would be a useless expense. The ultimate purpose of this requisition of the law is to protect the defendant’s estate from sale, provided, the rents and profits *157shall be sufficient to discharge the debt in seven years, and where this is the case, the plaintiff according to the 49th section, may obtain actual possession of the land in order to receive the profits. But where there is an outstanding life-estate in a third person, actual possession could not be delivered to the plaintiff consistently with the rights of such third person.

Rule discharged.
Exhibit
      32.1








Written
      Statement of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








The
      undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of The Wilber Corporation (the
      "Company"), hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date
      hereof:





(a)
            the
                Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarterly Period Ended September
                30,
                2006, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
                (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(b)
            information
                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                the
                financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
                Douglas C. GulottyDouglas
                C. GulottyPresident
                and Chief Executive OfficerDate:November
                7, 2006





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to The Wilber Corporation and will be retained
      by The Wilber Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.








40
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50098 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus FAUSTINO CALVARIO-CERNAS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-01-CR-431-ALL

-------------------- June 19, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Faustino Calvario-Cernas appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the sentence is invalid because it exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Calvario-Cernas complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) based on his prior deportation following an aggravated felony conviction. He argues that the sentencing provision violates the Due ProcessNo. 02-50098 -2- Clause. Alternatively, Calvario-Cernas contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues that the aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence was an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) that should have been alleged in his indictment.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Calvario-Cernas acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
No. 48905.

#### Protests 871826-G, etc., of Kwong Yuen Shing et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Quong Yuen Shing Co.*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247) the merchandise was found to contain salt and was therefore excluded from paragraph 5. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, J.C. Chatpar, certify that:

- I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-KSB ("Form 10-KSB/A) of Cyber Digital, Inc.; 
- Based on my knowledge, this Form 10-KSB/A does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the fiscal year covered by this annual report; 
- Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the fiscal years presented in this report; 
- The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
- The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

September****6, 2007

By:	/s/ J.C. Chatpar
Name:	J.C. Chatpar

Title:	Chief Executive Officer and 

Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  IBS
INTERACTIVE,  INC.'S  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET  AT  DECEMBER  31,  1999  AND
CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS  FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 </LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000


<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                              2,892
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                       4,378
<ALLOWANCES>                          261
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    7,452
<PP&E>                              2,775
<DEPRECIATION>                       1763
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     13,475
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               1,158
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                               50
<OTHER-SE>                         10,722
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       13,475
<SALES>                            18,774
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   18,774
<CGS>                              13,003
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      24,626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       26
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     81
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (6,193)
<INCOME-TAX>                          (45)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (6,238)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                       (6,238)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (1.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (1.45)



</TABLE>
No. 47104.

#### Protest 956449-G of W. B. Dick & Co., Ltd. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of cylindrical and tubular tanks or vessels and that they are the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Atlas Marine Supply Co.*v. *United States*(29 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 165). In accordance therewith the drums in question were held entitled to free entry under section 309(a), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 5(a), Customs Administrative Act of 1938, as claimed.
#### BENEDICT v. WHARTENBY.

September 9, 1837.

*Rule to show cause of*action, *and why defendant should not he discharged on common*bail,

An affidavit to hold to bail, which states that the defendant is indebted for goods sold and delivered merely, without averring “ by the plaintiff to defendant,” is defective, and the court will not hold defendant to bail.

THIS was a *capias ad respondendum,*to September term, 1837, 118. The plaintiff having been ruled to show his cause of action, produced an affidavit, which stated “ that the said defendant was justly and truly indebted to the said plaintiff, for goods sold and delivered, in the sum of •$—-,” without further averment.

*Perkins,*for the rule,

said that the affidavit was defective, inasmuch as it did not state that the goods were sold and delivered *by the plaintiff to the defendant,*and referred to *Tidd’s Forms of affidavits,*and *JVevins v. Merrie, 2 Whart.*499.

*Badger,*contra.

Per Curiam.—

Though all the formalities and averments of a declaration are not necessary in an affidavit to hold to bail; yet the latter must be sufficiently positive, and afford reasonable certainty, so as to prevent illusive statements, upon which the conclusion may be one way or the other, and yet the deponent not be liable for perjury. In this instance, the allegation that the goods were sold “ by plaintiff to defendant,” is material; because it is difficult to see how the defendant can be responsible to the plaintiff, for goods sold to the d efendant, by any other person than the plaintiff, except by way of guarantee or assumption ; and if it were so, it should be stated.

Rule absolute.a

a

*Vide*McCanles *v.*Frederickson; Kelly *v.*Kintzing; Young v. Corder; and Comly *v.*Goldsmith in this volume.