alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 146 (Wednesday, July 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20029]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Upper Stillwater Watershed, Darke and Miami Counties, Ohio

agency: Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA.

action: Notice of finding of no significant impact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) of the Natural Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969; the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations 
(40 CFR Part 1500); and the Natural Resources Conservation Service 
Regulations (7 CFR 650); the National Resources Conservation Service, 
U.S. Department of Agriculture, gives notice that an environmental 
impact statement is not being prepared for the Upper Stillwater 
Watershed, Darke and Miami Counties, Ohio.

for further information contact: Patrick Wolf, State Conservationist, 
Natural Resources Conservation Service, 200 North High Street, 
Columbus, Ohio 43215, telephone 614-469-6962.

supplementary information: The environmental assessment of this 
federally assisted action indicates that the project will not cause 
significant local, regional, or national impacts on the environment. As 
a result of these findings, Patrick Wolf, State Conservationist, has 
determined that the preparation and review of an environmental impact 
statement are not needed for this project.
    The project purposes are water quality improvement and watershed 
protection. The project purposes will be met through accelerated 
technical assistance in the planning and installation of conservation 
measures such as conservation tillage, grassed waterways, filter 
strips, animal waste facilities, cover crops, watering facilities, 
grade stabilizations, and nutrient management plans.
    The Notice of Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) has been 
forwarded to the Environmental Protection Agency and various Federal, 
State, and local agencies and interested parties. A limited number of 
copies of the FONSI are available to fill single copy requests at the 
above address. Basic data developed during the environmental assessment 
are on file and may be revised by contracting Patrick Wolf.
    No administrative action on implementation of the proposal will be 
taken until 30 days after the date of this publication in the Federal 
Register.

(This activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic 
Assistance under No. 10.904, Watershed Protection and Flood 
Prevention)
Patrick Wolf,
State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. 97-20029 Filed 7-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-M
Exhibit 24

                       POWER OF ATTORNEY



      The  undersigned,  a member of the Board  of  Directors  of

CalEnergy  Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),

hereby  constitutes  and appoints Steven A.  McArthur,  Craig  M.

Hammett and Douglas L. Anderson and each of them, as his/her true

and  lawful  attorney-in-fact  and  agent,  with  full  power  of

substitution and resubstitution, for and in his/her stead, in any

and  all capacities, to sign on his/her behalf the Company's Form

10-K  Annual Report for the fiscal year ending December 31,  1997

and  to execute any amendments thereto and to file the same, with

all  exhibits  thereto,  and all other  documents  in  connection

therewith,  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  and

applicable stock exchanges, with the full power and authority  to

do  and  perform  each  and  every act  and  thing  necessary  or

advisable to all intents and purposes as he/she might or could do

in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-

in-fact  and  agent,  or his/her substitute or  substitutes,  may

lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.



                       POWER OF ATTORNEY




Executed as of March 27, 1998


/s/ David L. Sokol                 /s/ David R. Morris
DAVID L. SOKOL                     DAVID R. MORRIS


/s/ Edgar D. Aronson               /s/ Bernard W. Reznicek
EDGAR D. ARONSON                   BERNARD W. REZNICEK


/s/ Judith E. Ayres                /s/ Walter Scott, Jr.
JUDITH E. AYRES                    WALTER SCOTT, JR.


/s/ Richard K. Davidson            /s/ John R. Shiner
RICHARD K. DAVIDSON                JOHN R. SHINER


/s/ David H. Dewhurst              /s/ Sir Neville G. Trotter
DAVID H. DEWHURST                  SIR NEVILLE G. TROTTER


/s/ Richard R. Jaros               /s/ David E. Wit
RICHARD R. JAROS                   DAVID E. WIT


/s/ Ben Holt
BEN HOLT
Exhibit 32.02    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Friendly Energy Exploration (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald L. Trapp, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/Donald L. Trapp By: Donald L. Trapp Chief Financial Officer  Dated: November 15, 2010  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Summary of Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.5 
 BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION 
 Form 10-Q for Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2007

 SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 
 Effective October 17, 2007 







 DIRECTOR COMPENSATON 
 At its quarterly meeting on October 17, 2007, the Board of Directors modified compensation arrangements for directors. 
 Effective immediately, each nonemployee director receives an annual retainer fee of $150,000, of which $75,000 is payable in cash and $75,000 is payable in restricted or deferred shares of the company’s common
stock. The shares vest when the director retires as a director. While the director is serving on the board, his or her restricted stock receives cash dividends, and deferred stock accrues additional shares of deferred stock in lieu of a cash
dividend. In addition, the chairman of the Audit Committee receives $10,000 in restricted or deferred stock annually, the chairmen of the Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee receive $7,500 in restricted or deferred stock
annually, and each member of the Audit Committee receives $5,000 in restricted or deferred stock annually. 
 Under the Deferred Compensation
Plan for Directors, any nonemployee director may elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of his or her director’s compensation until any date but no later than the year in which the director attains the age of 73 years. Participants may
elect to have cash deferred amounts (1) credited with interest quarterly at 80% of the prevailing prime rate, or (2) converted into common share units based on the deferral date closing price of Briggs & Stratton’s common
stock. Shares of Briggs & Stratton common stock that are deferred will be credited to a common stock account. Any balance of either the common share unit account or the common stock account will be credited with an amount equivalent to any
dividend paid on Briggs & Stratton’s common stock, which will be converted into additional common share units. Common share units may be distributed in cash or stock at the election of the directors. The balance in the common stock
account will be distributed in shares of Briggs & Stratton common stock. All other distributions will be paid in cash. Nonemployee directors are also provided with $150,000 of coverage under Briggs & Stratton’s Business Travel
Accident Plan while on corporate business. 
 Nonemployee directors are encouraged to use company products to enhance their understanding and
appreciation of the company’s business. Each such director may purchase at retail up to $10,000 annually of company products and products powered by the company’s engines. The company reimburses directors for the purchase price of these
products and also pays directors the applicable tax liability associated with the reimbursement. The amount of the reimbursement and tax payment is included in the director’s taxable income.
#### ASH v. CONYERS.

May 10, 1837.

*Rule to show cause why judgment should not he opened, and fieri facias set aside.*

Where judgment had been entered against a defendant, while proceedings were pending on a *writ de lunático inquirendo*in the Common Pleas, on which, a few days after the entry of the judgment, inquisition was found that the defendant was *non com. men.,*the court will open the judgment, so as to let in a defence, and set aside the execution issued on it.

But the court will order the judgment to stand as a security until further proceedings.

THIS was an action brought to March term, 1837. The plaintiff filed his copy, &c. under the act of 28th March, 1835, and on May 20, 1837, took his judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence. On the 10th of May, 1837, a writ *de lunático inquirendo*against the defendant issued, and commissioners were appointed in the Court of Common Pleas.

On May 22, 1837, inquisition was found, declaring the defendant to be *non comp, mentis.*

And now this rule was obtained to open this judgment and set aside the *fieri facias.*

*Traquair,*for the rule.

Per Curiam.

The act of 28th March, 1835, is peremptory that judgment shall be rendered for want of an affidavit of defence, on or at any time after the third Saturday succeeding the return day of the writ, if the plaintiff has complied with its requisitions in filing a copy of his claim, in the cases prescribed by the act. A statute, however, has relation to the general principles of the law, and it is only presumed to operate in cases where the parties are competent to appear in a court of justice: that is to say, not being infants, (necessaries being out of the question,) *feme coverts,*insane, and the like. Upon ascertaining that the process has been served upon parties destitute of legal capacity, on timely application, the court will revise their proceedings. In this case, it appears that proceedings were pending in the Common Pleas, as to the lunacy of the defendant, while *95the suit was progressing in this court, and but a few days intervened between judgment here, and inquisition found as to the lunacy in the Common Pleas. This court, therefore, grant this application on the ground that at the time the proceedings in this court were taking place, the defendant was *incapable*of being a party in* the eye of the law, as found by the inquest in the Court of Common Pleas. That no injury may be done, however, we order that the judgment shall stand as a security, until the plaintiff shall think proper to proceed *{vide*29 *E. C. L, R.*142) in such form as shall present the question, whether the defendant or his estate are responsible on the original contract, by virtue of his sanity at the time it was entered into.

Rule absolute, but judgment to stand as security.
#### D. C. Andrews & Co. of Massachusetts *v.*United States

No. 6955.

Entry No. 2773.

Invoice dated Birmingham, England, November 16, 1945.

Certified November 20, 1945.

Entered at Boston, Mass., DeeemberT9, 1945.

(Decided March 4, 1947)

*Henry L. Ziegel*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Energy Field Services, LLC (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rose M.
Robeson, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

        /s/ Rose M. Robeson
------------------------------------
Rose M. Robeson
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2003
# C_2014093EN.01002203.xml

| 29.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 February 2014 — Demon International v OHIM — Big Line (DEMON)

(Case T-380/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Figurative Community trade mark DEMON - Prior international word mark DEMON - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the goods - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2014/C 93/38

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Demon International (Orem, Utah, United States) (represented by: T. Krüger, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: F. Mattina, and subsequently by: L. Rampini, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Big Line Sas di Graziani Lorenzo (Thiene, Italy) (represented by: B. Osti, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 June 2012 (Case R 1845/2011-4) concerning invalidity proceedings between Demon International, LC and Big Line Sas di Graziani Lorenzo.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 20 June 2012 (Case R 1845/2001-4) insofar as it annulled in part the decision of the Cancellation Division and rejected the application for a declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark No 6 375 398 concerning ‘ski masks’ and ‘snowboard masks’; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 20 June 2012 (Case R 1845/2001-4) insofar as it annulled in part the decision of the Cancellation Division and rejected the application for a declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark No 6 375 398 concerning ‘ski masks’ and ‘snowboard masks’;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders Demon International, LC and Big Line Sas di Graziani Lorenzo to bear their own costs, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Demon International, LC and Big Line Sas di Graziani Lorenzo to bear their own costs, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal;

| 4. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 331, 27.10.2012.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. QF07-60-000] 

Take notice that on December 27, 2006, Food Lion LLC, 2110 Executive Drive, Salisbury, NC 28145 (Headquarters), filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission a notice of self-certification of a facility as a qualifying cogeneration facility pursuant to 18 CFR 292.207(a) of the Commission's regulations. 

This qualifying cogeneration facility consists of a 365 kW packaged diesel engine generator set operating on #2 fuel oil. The package is set on a concrete pad. The unit is self-contained, including all necessary switchgear and controls. The electricity is generated at 208 V, 3 phase, 60 Hz. The facility is located at 700 E. Parrish Drive, Benson, NC 27504. 

This qualifying facility interconnects with the Town of Benson's electric distribution system. The facility will provide standby power and occasionally supplementary power to Food Lion. 

A notice of self-certification does not institute a proceeding regarding qualifying facility status; a notice of self-certification provides notice that the entity making filing has determined the Facility meets the applicable criteria to be a qualifying facility. Any person seeking to challenge such qualifying facility status may do so by filing a motion pursuant to 18 CFR 292.207(d)(iii). 

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*, using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-9983 Filed 5-23-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
(Reap. Dec. 9945)

#### Sullivan Tile Distributors *v.*United States

Entry No. 960331.

(Decided March 13, 1961)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*William S. Orrich, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General *(Morris Braverman,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

MollisoN, Judge:

The parties, through their representatives, in the above-enumerated case have submitted the appeal for reappraisement upon stipulation on the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the tiles involved, and that such values, as to pattern Nos. KF-SE-1, KF-SE-3, KF-SE-5, KF-SE-6, KF-SE-7, KF-SE-9, and KF-SR-10, are the invoice values, net, packed.

As to all other items on the invoices, the appeal, having been abandoned, is to that extent dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
No. 56767.

protests 818492-G, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Samuel S. Perry *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0241%205(e)/p120241.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:12:00 PM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0241

Focus Ready Draft 4/9/2012

ENGINEER: Avcin \ JD \ JAS

.

 
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0241%205(e)/p120241.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:12:00 PM]

 

SAT (concerns) (03/30/2012):

Migration to groundwater: PMN negl; Incin Pdt rapid

PBT rating: P3B2T2 PMN: P3B1T1, Health 1-2, Eco 1 //

Incin Pdt: P3B2T2, Health 2, Eco, 3

Health: 2 Drinking Water, Inhalation, Inhalation for per-F

acid

Eco: 3 No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

P2 Claim: 
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0241%205(e)/p120241.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:12:00 PM]

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0241

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0241
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0241%205(e)/p120241.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:12:00 PM]
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0241%205(e)/p120241.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:12:00 PM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0241
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0241%205(e)/p120241.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:12:00 PM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0241
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0241%205(e)/p120241.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:12:00 PM]
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0241%205(e)/p120241.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:12:00 PM]
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b)
AND 15d-14(b)


(Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sino Clean Energy Inc. on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned does
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her
knowledge and belief:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of the operation of the
Company.


Dated:
      November 12, 2010By:
                  /s/
      Baowen RenBaowen
      RenChief
      Executive Officer





Dated:
      November 12, 2010By:
              /s/
      Wen FuWen
      (Wendy) FuChief
      Financial Officer