alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20262]



[[Page 41371]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense


Meeting of the DOD Advisory Group on Electron Devices

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Advisory Group on Electron Devices.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Working Group B (Microelectronics) of the DOD Advisory Group 
on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a closed session meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held at 0900, Wednesday, September 17, 1997.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Palisades Institute for Research 
Services, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, Virginia 
22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Timothy Doyle, AGED Secretariat, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal 
Square Four, Suite 500, Arlington, Virginia 22202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to 
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology, to the Director Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E), 
and through the DDR&E, to the Director Defense Advanced Research 
Projects Agency and the Military Departments in planning and managing 
an effective research and development program in the field of electron 
devices.
    The Working Group B meeting will be limited to review of research 
and development programs which the military proposes to initiate with 
industry, universities or in their laboratories. The microelectronics 
area includes such programs on semiconductor materials, integrated 
circuits, charge coupled devices and memories. The review will include 
classified program details throughout.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of Pub. L. 94-463, as amended, (5 
U.S.C. App. 10(d) (1994)), it has been determined that this Advisory 
Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), 
and that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to the public.

    Dated: July 25, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-20262 Filed 7-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
No. 39258.

#### Protests 897143-G, etc., of W. A. Taylor & Co. et al. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

On the records presented the protests were overruled as unsupported.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00439-CV

The City of Cedar Park, Appellant

v.

Kirk Anthony, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GN403437, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant, the City of Cedar Park, has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this

appeal. We grant its motion and dismiss this appeal.

 

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: September 19, 2006
# Euroopan unionin C 48/2013

| | ISSN 1977-1053
  doi:10.3000/19771053.C_2013.048.fin |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 48 |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 56. vuosikerta19. helmikuu 2013 |

ISSN 1977-1053

doi:10.3000/19771053.C_2013.048.fin

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 48

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

56. vuosikerta19. helmikuu 2013

---

| Ilmoitusnumero | Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Ilmoitukset |
| | HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT |
| | Euroopan parlamentti |
| 2013/C 048/01 | Päätös | 1 |

Ilmoitusnumero

Sisältö

Sivu

V   Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Euroopan parlamentti

2013/C 048/01

Päätös

1

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

V Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Euroopan parlamentti

| 19.2.2013 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | C 48/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2013

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

C 48/1

---

PÄÄTÖS

2013/C 48/01

EUROOPAN PARLAMENTIN PÄÄSIHTEERI, joka

ottaa huomioon neuvoston asetuksen (ETY, Euratom, EHTY) N:o 259/68 sellaisena kuin se on muutettuna neuvoston asetuksella (EY, Euratom) N:o 723/2004 ja viimeksi Euroopan yhteisöjen virkamiehiin sovellettavien henkilöstösääntöjen ja näiden yhteisöjen muuta henkilöstöä koskevien palvelussuhteen ehtojen muuttamisesta 24 päivänä marraskuuta 2010 annetun Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston asetuksen (EU, Euratom) N:o 1080/2010 ja erityisesti näiden henkilöstösääntöjen 30 artiklan,

ottaa huomioon puhemiehistön 3. toukokuuta 2004 tekemän päätöksen nimittävän viranomaisen ja työsopimusten tekemiseen toimivaltaisen viranomaisen toimivallan siirrosta sellaisena kuin se on viimeksi muutettuna puhemiehistön 4. toukokuuta 2009 tekemällä päätöksellä,

ottaa huomioon, että seuraavien Euroopan parlamentin varallaololuetteloiden voimassaolo päättyi 31. joulukuuta 2012:

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006, AST/5/08, PE/69/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S, PE/119/S,

ottaa huomioon pariteettikomitean kokouksessaan 21. marraskuuta 2012 antaman lausunnon,

ON PÄÄTTÄNYT SEURAAVAA:

1 artikla

Varallaololuetteloiden

AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, AST/5/08, PE/96/S, PE/110/S ja PE/119/S

voimassaoloa jatketaan 31. joulukuuta 2013 asti.

2 artikla

Varallaololuetteloiden

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, C/348, AST/1/05, AST/1/06 ja PE/69/S

voimassaoloa ei jatketa.

Tehty Luxemburgissa 20 päivänä joulukuuta 2012.

Klaus WELLE

Pääsihteeri

---
#### Ex parte Johnny Joe MARTINEZ.

No. 36840-01.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

April 29, 1998.

Nathaniel G. Rhodes, Corpus Christi, for Appellant. •

Annette Smith, Assistant District Attorney, Corpus Christi, Matthew Paul, State’s Attorney, Austin, for State.

BAIRD, Judge,

dissenting.

This is a post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.071.1 Applicant is represented by counsel appointed by this Court. The instant application is five and one half pages long and raises four challenges to the conviction. The trial record is never quoted. Only three cases are cited in the entire application, and no cases are cited for the remaining two claims for relief. Those claims comprise only 17 lines with three inches of margin.2

*590Under these circumstances, the merits of the application should not be reached. Instead, this matter should be remanded to the habeas court to determine whether applicant has received effective assistance of counsel. Because the majority does not, I dissent.

1

. The opinion on direct appeal may be found at *Martinez v. State,*924 S.W.2d 693 (Tex.Cr.App.1996).

2

. Our records reveal that counsel did not seek reimbursement for any travel or investigatoiy expenses, nor request any expert assistance in preparing this application. The same records reflect that counsel spent less than 50 hours preparing the application.
No. 74-719.

No. 74-5568.

#### Neale et vir *v.*Hayduk et al., Garcia *v.*United States,

*ante,*p. 915; and

*ante,*p. 960. Petitions for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 10.3


                            COLLATERAL MORTGAGE NOTE


$ 15,000,000.00                                    PLAQUEMINES PARISH, LOUISIANA

                                                                 August 26, 2007

     ON DEMAND, I, We, or either of us, promise to pay to the order of EnGlobal
Engineering, Inc., 654 N. Sam Houston Parkway, Suite 400, Houston, Texas 77060,
FIFTEEN MILLION DOLLARS ($15,000,000.00), for value received, with SIX PERCENT
(6.00%) interest per annum from date until paid, payable on demand.

     In case this Note should be placed in the hands of an attorney, after its
maturity, to institute legal proceedings to recover the amount hereof, or any
part hereof, in principal or interest, or to protect the interests of the holder
hereon or in case the same should be placed in the hands of an attorney for
collection, compromise or other action, the makers, endorsers binds themselves
to pay the fees of the attorney who may be employed for that purpose, which fees
are hereby fixed at TWENTY-FIVE (25%) PERCENT on the amount due or sued for, or
claimed or sought to be protected, preserved or enforced.

     The makers of this Note and the endorsers, guarantors and sureties hereon
hereby severally waive presentment for payment, demand, notice of nonpayment,
protest, and all pleas of division and discussion and agree that without notice
of such extension, or extensions and without previous consent hereby binding
themselves, in solido, unconditionally and as original promisors, for the
payment hereof in principal, interest costs and attorney fees. No delay on the
part of the holder hereof in exercising any rights hereunder shall operate as a
waiver of such rights.


                                               SOUTH LOUISIANA ETHANOL, L.L.C.


                                               ---------------------------------
                                               BY:  KENNETT F. STEWART
                                               TITLE:  MANAGER


NE VARIETUR
In conformity with an Act of
Collateral Mortgage in favor of EnGlobal
Engineering, Inc., passed before me,
this 27th day of August, 2007.


------------------------------------
NOTARY PUBLIC
```

[111th Congress Public Law 138]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 7]]

Public Law 111-138
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
    To provide that claims of the United States to certain documents 
  relating to Franklin Delano Roosevelt shall be treated as waived and 
   relinquished in certain circumstances. <<NOTE: Feb. 1, 2010 -  [S. 
                                 692]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS RELATING TO 
                              FRANKLIN DELANO ROOSEVELT.

    (a) In General.--If any person or entity makes a gift of any 
property described in subsection (b) to the National Archives and 
Records Administration, then any claim of the United States to such 
property shall be treated as having been waived and relinquished on the 
day before the date of such gift.
    (b) Property Described.--Property is described in this subsection if 
such property--
            (1) is a part of the collection of documents, papers, and 
        memorabilia relating to Franklin Delano Roosevelt or any member 
        of his family or staff; and
            (2) was in the possession of Grace Tully and retained by her 
        at the time of her death.

    (c) Date of Gift.--The date of a gift referred to in subsection (a) 
is any date specified by the donor so long as such date is subsequent to 
the physical delivery of the property described in subsection (b) to the 
National Archives and Records Administration.

    Approved February 1, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 692:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 111-87 (Comm. on Homeland Security and Governmental 
Affairs).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 155 (2009):
                                    Oct. 14, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.
                                                        Vol. 156 (2010):
                                    Jan. 13, considered and passed 
                                        House.

                                  <all>
```
609 S.E.2d 611

#### Raymond Brian THOMAS, Sr., Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Appellee.

Record No. 2889-03-4.

Court of Appeals of Virginia.

March 1, 2005.

Before FITZPATRICK, C.J., and BENTON, ELDER, BUMGARDNER, FRANK, HUMPHREYS, CLEMENTS, FELTON, KELSEY and McCLANAHAN, JJ.

Upon a Petition for Rehearing En Banc

On February 4, 2005 came the appellant, by counsel, and filed a petition praying that the Court set aside the judgment rendered herein on January 25, 2005, and grant a rehearing *en banc*thereof.

On consideration whereof, the petition for rehearing *en banc*is granted, the mandate entered herein on January 25, 2005 is stayed pending the decision of the Court *en banc,*and the appeal is reinstated on the docket of this Court.

The parties shall file briefs in compliance with Rule 5A:35. The appellant shall attach as an addendum to the opening brief upon rehearing *en banc*a copy of the opinion previously rendered by the Court in this matter. It is further ordered that the appellant shall file with the clerk of this Court twelve additional copies of the appendix previously filed in this case.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 146 (Wednesday, July 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19975]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. RP97-71-000 and RP97-312-000]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Informal 
Settlement Conference

July 24, 1997.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened 
in this proceeding on Friday, August 8, 1997, at 10:00 a.m., at the 
offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
N.E., Washington, DC, 20426, for the purpose of exploring the possible 
settlement of the above-referenced dockets.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant as 
defined in 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    For additional information, please contact David R. Cain at (202) 
208-0917, Donald A. Heydt at (202) 208-0740 or Paul B. Mohler at (202) 
208-1240.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-19975 Filed 7-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2014135EN.01001801.xml

| 5.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Finanzamt Saarlouis v Heinz Malburg

(Case C-204/13) (1)

1

((Taxation - Value added tax - Origin and scope of the right of deduction - Dissolution of a partnership by a partner - Acquisition of a portion of the client base of that partnership - Contribution in kind to another partnership - Payment of input tax - Whether deduction possible))

2014/C 135/19

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Finanzamt Saarlouis

Applicants:

Defendants: Heinz Malburg

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Bundesfinanzhof — Interpretation of Articles 4(1) and (2) and 17(2)(a) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Creation and extent of the right to deduct — Acquisition of a portion of the client base of a dissolved partnership by a partner in that partnership for the purpose of bringing it into a new partnership as a contribution in kind — Whether it is possible to deduct the input tax.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 4(1) and (2) and Article 17(2)(a) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 95/7/EC of 10 April 1995 must, having regard to the principle of value added tax neutrality, be interpreted as meaning that a partner in a partnership of tax advisors who acquires from that partnership a portion of its client base for the sole purpose of making that client base available directly and free of charge to a newly founded partnership of tax advisors, in which he is the principal partner, so that that partnership can use that client base in its business, without that client base however becoming part of the capital assets of the newly founded partnership, is not entitled to deduct input value added tax paid on the acquisition of the client base concerned.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 22.6.2013.

1

---
**Exhibit 31.1**

Certification of CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 

I, Gary W. Macleod, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 10-KSB of Non-Invasive Monitoring Systems, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The Company’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s annual report for the year ended July 31, 2006 that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Issuer’s internal control over financial reporting. 

5. The Company’s other certifying officer(s) andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditor and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Dated: October 29, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20261]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board Task Force on Nuclear Deterrence

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Nuclear Deterrence 
will meet in closed session on August 12-14, 1997 at The Beckman 
Center, 100 Academy Drive, Irvine, California.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this meeting the Task 
Force will address the U.S. ability to deter and prevent the effective 
use of weapons of mass destruction against U.S. territory, forces, and 
allies.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has 
been determined that this DSB Task Force meeting concerns matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly this meeting 
will be closed to the public.

    Dated: July 24, 1997.
L. M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-20261 Filed 7-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 18 (Tuesday, January 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-1984]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Privacy Act of 1974; Proposed Changes to Systems of Records

AGENCY: Railroad Retirement Board.

ACTION: Notice of a proposed new routine use.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of this document is to give notice of a proposed 
routine use to one of the Railroad Retirement Board's (RRB's) Privacy 
Act systems of records.

DATES: The proposed routine use will be effective 30 calendar days from 
the date of this publication (February 27, 1997), unless comments are 
received before this date which would result in a contrary 
determination.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Beatrice Ezerski, Secretary to the Board, 
Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 
60611-2092.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
LeRoy Blommaert, Privacy Act Officer, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 
North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092, (312) 751-4548.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 
(Pub. L. 104-134) requires Federal agencies to furnish necessary 
information to the Department of the Treasury to enable that agency to 
attempt to collect outstanding Federal debts by offsets to Federal 
payments. In order to comply with the provisions of the Privacy Act, 
the RRB must publish a routine use to its applicable Privacy Act System 
of Records that will allow it to furnish the Department with the 
information necessary to collect any debts arising under the laws 
administered by the RRB.

    By authority of the Board.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
RRB-42

System Name:
    Uncollectible Benefit Overpayment Accounts--RRB.
* * * * *
    Paragraph ``i'' is added to read as follows:

Routine uses of records maintained in the system, including categories 
of users and the purposes of such uses:
* * * * *
    i. Debtors names, Social Security Numbers, Railroad Retirement 
claim numbers, accounts of debts, history of the debts, and other 
relevant and necessary information may be disclosed to the Financial 
Management Service, Department of the Treasury, for the purpose of 
recovery of debts under the provisions of the Debt Collection 
Improvement Act of 1996.

[FR Doc. 97-1984 Filed 1-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M