alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41389-41390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20181]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Agency Recordkeeping/Reporting Requirements Under Emergency 
Review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)

    Title: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Financial Reporting 
Form, ACF-196.
    OMB No.: New.
    Description: The form provides specific data regarding claims and 
provides a mechanism for States to request grant awards and certify the 
availability of State matching funds. Failure to collect this data 
would seriously compromise ACF's ability to monitor expenditures. This 
information is also used to estimate outlays and may be used to prepare 
ACF budget submissions to Congress. The following citations should be 
noted in regards to this collection: 405(c)(1); 409(a)(7); and 
409(a)(1).
    Respondents: States, Puerto Rico, Guam, Virgin Islands and the 
District of Columbia.

[[Page 41390]]



                                             Annual Burden Estimates                                            
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Number of      Average burden                   
               Instrument                     Number of       responses per       hours per       Total burden  
                                             respondents       respondent         response            hours     
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACF-196.................................                54                 4                 8             1,728
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,728.                                                                     

    Additional Information: ACF is requesting that OMB grant a 180 day 
approval for this information collection under procedures for emergency 
processing by August 15, 1997. A copy of this information collection, 
with applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained by calling 
the Administration for Children and Families, Reports Clearance 
Officer, Bob Driscoll at (202) 401-6465.
    Comments and questions about the information collection described 
above should be directed to the Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for ACF, Office of Management and 
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, 
DC 20503, (202) 401-9313.

    Dated: July 25, 1997.
Bob Sargis,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-20181 Filed 7-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
#### Elias P. Chord, plaintiff in error, *vs.*George M’Coy, defendant in error.

*Error to Cedar.*

The sheriff 1⁄8 the proper officer to Teceive and execute process in all cases, unless there is an affidavit of partiality, prejudice, consanguinity or interest existing in him or his deputy.

If a coroner execute process without such affidavit having been previously filed, the •service is void.

This was an action of trespass vi et armis, instituted by Chord against M’Coy, in the District Court of Cedar county, and the writ directed to the coroner.

The suit was dismissed on the defendant’s motion, on the ground that there had been no affidavit filed as required bv the statute, so as to authorize the coroner to serve the summons, instead of the sheriff.

Judgment was rendered against the plaintiff for costs, at the special term in August, 1841, which judgment is now sought to be reversed, because the court below erred in sustaining the motion to dismiss, &c.

Hastings, for plaintiff in error.

Whichek, for defendant in error.

Per Curiam,

Mason, Chief Justice.

The question we are called upon to decide in the present case is, whether it is regular for the clerk to issue a summons and direct it to the coroner in any case, unless where an affidavit of the interestedness of the sheriff has been first filed. We think it is not. The third section of the act relative to coroners and their duties, (Laws of 1839-40, page 11,) makes it the duty of the clerk to issue and direct process to the coroner in all cases, upon an affidavit of the partiality, prejudice, consanguinity or interest of the sheriff or his deputy, being made and filed in his office. Unless such affidavit be first made and filed, the sheriff is the proper officer to whom process of this kind should be directed.

It may be thought a matter of small import, whether a ministerial duty of this kind, be performed by the sheriff or coroner, but the law seems to regard it as material. If it will not permit the sheriff to serve *312a summons, where either he himself, or his deputy are akin to the defendant, it cannot be regarded as unimportant whether he or some other person serve a process in an ordinary case. The service and return bv the coroner are of no more validity than though made by any other person, unless in the cases provided for by law, and it can only be known in the mode pointed out by statute, when such a case is presented.

But it is said that the courts will take notice of their own officers, and that the District Court, without proof, ought to have recognised M’Coy as its sheriff. What evidence have we even at this time, that M’Coy is the sheriff of Cedar county ? If the District Court should haye taken notice of this fact without proof, must the Supreme Court do so likewise'! Admitting the position assumed by counsel to be correct, it was incumbent on them by bill of exceptions to have placed the matter properly before the Supreme Court. We see nothing upon the record from which such an inference can be legitimately drawn.

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2013207EN.01002802.xml

| 20.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/28

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 15 May 2013 — Provincie Antwerpen v Mobistar NV

(Case C-264/13)

2013/C 207/46

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Provincie Antwerpen

Appellant:

Respondent: Mobistar NV

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 6 and/or Article 13 of Directive 2002/20/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive) be interpreted as precluding a public authority of a Member State from being allowed to tax, for budgetary or other reasons, the economic activity of telecommunications operators which arises in the territory or a part thereof through the presence on public or private property of GSM masts, pylons or antennae which are used for that activity?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2002 L 108, p. 21.

1

---
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

Page - 1

I. GENERAL

District: Monterey Bay Unified APCD Date Adopted: 4/20/05 

Rule No: Rule 902 Regulation Title: District’s Request for

Information 

Date Submitted To ARB: 2/23/05 Date Last Amended or Revised: 3/8/84 

Pollutants Regulated By This Rule (Check): 

 NOx SO2 PM10 VOC _ TAC (Name of TAC) 

Is this rule intended to be sent to the EPA as a SIP revision? X Yes No.

SUMMARY OF RULE CHANGES: New rule ? Amended rule

Rule Repealed.

 

II. NET EFFECT ON EMISSIONS Increase Decrease X No change N/A

Emissions reduction commitment in SIP for this source category: 0.0 tons/year 

SCC/CES Code(s) Affected: na 

 Affected SIC Code(s): na 

Inventory Year to Calculate Changes in Emissions: na Affected Area: 

Future Year Control Profile Estimate ( VOC emissions): N/A

Tons/Year Baseline

Reductions Tons/year Control Percent Control Control

 Year (increases) Subject to Rule Level Control Level Factor

 N/A / = * 100 = % 1.00 - = 

 / = * 100 = % 1.00 - = 

 / = * 100 = % 1.00 - = 

 

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS District is: Attainment Nonattainment X Split

Approximate number of minor (<100 TPY) sources controlled by rule: na . Percent in nonattainment

area: na .

Number of major (? 100 TPY) sources controlled: NONE . Percent in nonattainment area: 0%
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

Page - 2

Location of Major Sources by City: N/A

 

IV. EMISSIONS REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY N/A

Does rule include emission limits that are continuous? Yes; X No. 

If yes, those limits are in Section(s) N/A of the rule.

Other methods in the rule for achieving emissions reductions are: 

 

 

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS The rule contains:

1) Emission limits in Section(s) N/A .

2) Work practice standards in Section(s) na .

3) Record keeping requirements in Section(s) na .

4) Reporting requirements in Section(s) na .

 

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN X No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts Attainment

DISCUSSION:
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of nFinanSe Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 2, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry R. Welch, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Jerry R. WelchDate:   November 12, 2010
Jerry R. Welch

Chief Executive Officer and Director
Exhibit 32.1

                           INTRAOP MEDICAL CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intraop Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P.
Powers, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                     /s/   John P. Powers
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                     John P. Powers
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

                                                     Date:  August 14, 2009


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Intraop Medical Corporation and will be retained by Intraop Medical
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 27, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 27, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1997
<CASH>                                           4,223
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  142,836
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,309
<INVENTORY>                                     90,034
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               242,460
<PP&E>                                         175,543
<DEPRECIATION>                                  84,009
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 615,731
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          139,373
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,885
<OTHER-SE>                                     261,807
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   615,731
<SALES>                                        670,545
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               670,545
<CGS>                                          447,806
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  447,806
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               188,260
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,774
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,477
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,363
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,114
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55
        

</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 9940)

#### All American Machine Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 932722, etc.

(Decided March 7, 1961)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*William*JET. *Orrich, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule, 'attached to and made part of this decision, were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff. The cases’ were thereupon ordered submitted by the court.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser. Judgment will be entered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 150 (Tuesday, August 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20571]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1177-DR]


Idaho; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Idaho (FEMA-1177-DR) dated June 13, 1997, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 25, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Idaho is hereby amended to include the following areas among those 
areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe 
declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of June 
13, 1997:

    Butte County for Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation.
    Madison County for Individual Assistance (already designated for 
Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation).

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-20571 Filed 8-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Docket No. FAA-2015-0077 Dir ID 2013-NM-254-AD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 2/18/15

Regional Airline Association 2/18/15

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 2/18/15

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 2/18/15
June 10, 2015

Mr. Donald Fiedler 980 County Road W Fremont, NE 68025

Dear Mr. Donald Fiedler:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 14, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 1670), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7234

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARIO CASTRILLON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-89-159-B, CA-97-81-R) Submitted: March 30, 1999 Decided: April 16, 1999 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mario Castrillon, Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Mario Castrillon seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Castrillon’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Castrillon , Nos. CR-89-159-B; CA-97-81-R (W.D. Va. June 26 and Sept. 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 150 (Tuesday, August 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20553]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 United States Code Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of 
the following National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 
Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Small Grant Review (Teleconference).
    Date: August 12, 1997.
    Time: 2:00 p.m.-adjournment.
    Place: 6100 Executive Boulevard, 6100 Building--Room 5E01, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
    Contact Person: Gopal M. Bhatnagar, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 6100 Building--Room 5E01, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892, Telephone: 301-496-1696.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate and review a grant application.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. The 
discussions of this application could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
application, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is published less than 15 days prior to the meeting 
due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by the 
review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. [No. 93.865, 
Research Mothers and Children], National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: July 30, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-20553 Filed 8-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT


TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Non-Invasive
Monitoring Systems, Inc. for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009 (the “Report”),
the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Non-Invasive Monitoring Systems,
Inc.




By:
              /s/ Adam S. JacksonAdam
      S. JacksonChief
      Financial OfficerOctober
      28, 2009




The
certification set forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part
of the Report or as a separate disclosure document of Non-Invasive Monitoring
Systems, Inc. or the certifying officers
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #9 Ltd. (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Freddie M.
      KotekName:
            Freddie
      M. KotekTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            May
      13, 2008