alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 366 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2344 

To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until December 31, 2012. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 24 (legislative day, APRIL 23), 2012 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and ordered 

placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until 

December 31, 2012. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSUR4 ANCE PROGRAM. 

5 (a) PROGRAM EXTENSION.—Section 1319 of the Na6 tional Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4026) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘the earlier of the date of the enact8 ment into law of an Act that specifically amends the date 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2344 PCS

1 specified in this section or May 31, 2012’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘December 31, 2012’’. 

3 (b) FINANCING.—Section 1309(a) of the National 

4 Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is 

5 amended by striking ‘‘the earlier of the date of the enact6 ment into law of an Act that specifically amends the date 

7 specified in this section or May 31, 2012’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘December 31, 2012’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 366 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2344 

A BILL 

To extend the National Flood Insurance Program 

until December 31, 2012. 

APRIL 24, 2012 

Read twice and ordered placed on the calendar 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FirstBingo.com (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Thomas M. Sheppard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 14th day of May, 2004.



| | /s/ Thomas Sheppard
Thomas M. Sheppard
Chief Executive Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------









---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 145 (Tuesday, July 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20066]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission


F.C.S.C. Meeting Notice No. 19-97

    The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its 
regulations (45 CFR part 504) and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 
U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of 
meetings and oral hearings for the transaction of Commission business 
and other matters specified, as follows:

    Dates and Times: Monday, August 4, 1997, 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; 
Wednesday, August 6, 1997, 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; Friday, August 8, 
1997, 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; Monday, August 11, 1997, 9:30 a.m. to 
5:00 p.m.; Wednesday, August 13, 1997, 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; 
Friday, August 15, 1997, 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; Monday, August 18, 
1997, 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; Wednesday, August 20, 1997, 9:30 a.m. 
to 5:00 p.m.; Friday, August 22, 1997, 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; 
Monday, August 25, 1997, 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; Wednesday, August 
27, 1997, 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; Friday, August 29, 1997, 9:30 a.m. 
to 5:00 p.m.
    Subject Matter: (1) Oral Hearings and Hearings on the Record on 
Objections to the Commission's Proposed Decision on the Scope of the 
Holocaust Survivors Claims Program, Decision No. HS-I, issued June 
16, 1997; (2) Oral Hearings and Hearings on the Record on Objections 
to Individual Proposed Decisions on Claims of Holocaust Survivors 
Against Germany; (3) Consideration of Individual Proposed Decisions 
on Claims of Holocaust Survivors Against Germany; (4) Issuance of 
Final Decision on the Scope of the Holocaust Survivors Claims 
Program, Decision No. HS-II; (5) Issuance of Individual Final 
Decisions on Claims of Holocaust Survivors Against Germany.
    Status: Closed.
    All meetings are held at the Foreign claims Settlement 
Commission, 600 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. Requests for 
information, or advance notices of intention to observe an open 
meeting, may be directed to: Administrative Officer, Foreign Claims 
Settlement Commission, 600 E Street, NW., Room 6002, Washington, DC 
20579. Telephone: (202) 616-6988.

    Dated at Washington, DC, July 25, 1997.
Judith H. Lock,
Administrative Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-20066 Filed 7-25-97; 2:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-P
No. 54989.

#### The Ove Gnatt Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 154797-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
(Reap. Dec. 9137)

#### Jaguar Cars North American Corp. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. M 4782; M 5; M 5015.

(Decided April 24, 1958)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Murray Shlaroff,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Donlon, Judge:

These appeals to reappraisement, consolidated at trial, involve Jaguar automobiles that were imported from England. *800Several, different types of Jaguars were entered, but these appeals have to do only with those automobiles entered as “2.4 Jaguar Saloon Cars.”

At the hearing, plaintiff appeared without counsel. Defendant’s counsel conceded error in the appraisement, and the consolidated appeals were submitted on the following stipulation of facts:

> Mr. Sklaroff: These cars were entered, at a value of Pounds Sterling 714.19.3, plus extras, less Pounds Sterling 1.0.0. for headlights not supplied.

> Because of the fact that there is no foreign value and the importer here is the only purchaser in the United States the appraisement was made on the basis of cost of production, and was appraised at a value of Pounds Sterling 754.5.8, plus extras, less Pounds Sterling 1.0.1. for headlights not supplied.

> Now, the importer does not object to the basis of valuation, that is, cost of production, but he claims that the entered value was correct.

> The Customs officials have ascertained that the value assigned on appraisement was erroneous; it was obtained from a cost of production list supplied by the manufacturer, but not to be effective until subsequent to the date of importation of these automobiles.

> Therefore, the Government is willing to stipulate that the entered value, Pounds Sterling 714.19.3, plus extras, less Pounds Sterling 1.0.0. for headlights not supplied is the correct value for appraisement.

The parties further stipulated facts which negate finding that there was any foreign, export, or United States value for these cars.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of facts, I find and hold that cost of production, as defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for determination of value of the merchandise “2.4 Jaguar Saloon Cars” and that, for such merchandise, said cost of production value is the entered value, sterling £714.19.3, plus extras, less 1 pound sterling for headlights not supplied.

As to all other merchandise, the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 18 (Tuesday, January 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4079-4080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2034]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Stipulation and Settlement Pursuant to the 
Clean Water Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United States v. 
Meridian Engineering, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 96-05M was lodged 
on January 13, 1997 in the United States District Court for the 
District of the Virgin Islands. The settlement resolves an action 
commenced in a complaint filed January 12, 1996, under the Clean Water 
Act, 33 U.S.C. 1301, et seq., arising at an asphalt batching plant in 
St. Croix operated by Meridian Engineering, Inc. and the Virgin Islands 
Asphalt Products Corp.
    The Complaint alleges that the Defendants violated the Clean Water 
Act by: (1) Discharging waste water without a National Pollutant 
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit on two occasions, in 
violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (CWA), 33

[[Page 4080]]

U.S.C. 1311; and (2) failing to apply for a NPDES storm water discharge 
permit, in violation of Sections 308 and 402 of the CWA, 33 U.S.C. 1319 
and 1342. Under the settlement, the Defendants will pay a civil penalty 
to the United States of $47,500.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed settlement. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to United 
States v. Meridian Engineering, Inc., et al., DOJ Ref. #90-5-1-1-4224.
    The proposed settlement may be examined at the office of the United 
States Attorney, 1108 King St. #201, Christiansted, St. Croix; the 
Region II Office of the Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 
New York, New York; and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, 
NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the 
proposed settlement may be obtained in person or by mail from the 
Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 
20005. In requesting a copy please refer to the referenced case and 
enclose a check may payable to the Consent Decree Library in the amount 
of $2.00 (25 cents per page reproduction costs).
Joel M. Gross,
Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-2034 Filed 1-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
**Exhibit      32.2**

| (1) | The                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                  |                                                                      |                                                             |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |                                                                      |
|                             |                                                                 |                                                        |
| Dated:                August 20, 2007 | By:                                                             |     /s/ Xiaogang              Zhu  |
|                                  |                                                                           |
|                                  | Xiaogang                Zhu Chief                  Financial Officer |

----
----

EXHIBIT 32.a

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Pan American Energy Corp. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,Korina Houghton, in my capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date: April 22, 2004 | /s/ Korina Houghton

_______________________      Korina Houghton, Chief Financial Officer |
|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7522

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus NELSON LEE JENNINGS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-03-831; CR-99-165) Submitted: January 31, 2005 Decided: February 24, 2005 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nelson Lee Jennings, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Westley Haynie, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Nelson Lee Jennings seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jennings has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.1    
    


AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO

FOREST OIL CORPORATION

2001 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN  


        WHEREAS, Forest Oil Corporation (the "Company") has heretofore adopted the Forest Oil Corporation 2001 Stock
Incentive Plan, as amended (the "Plan"); and 


        WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects; 


        NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows: 



        1.     The
last sentence of Paragraph V(b) of the Plan shall be deleted and the following shall be substituted therefor: 



"Director
Stock Awards shall be awarded as provided in Paragraph VII(f); provided, however, that notwithstanding any provision in the Plan to the contrary, no Director Stock Award shall be
granted on or after the date of the special meeting of the shareholders of the Company at which the shareholders of the Company are asked to approve the adoption of the Forest Oil Corporation 2007
Stock Incentive Plan." 




        2.     The
amendment to the Plan set forth in paragraph 1 hereof shall be effective as of the date of the special meeting of the shareholders of the Company at which the
shareholders of the Company are asked to approve the adoption of the Forest Oil Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2007 Plan"), provided that the 2007 Plan is approved by the Company's
shareholders at such meeting. If the 2007 Plan is not so approved at such meeting, then the amendment to the Plan set forth in paragraph 1 hereof shall be void ab
initio. 


        3.     As
amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and reaffirmed. 


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Amendment No. 4 to Forest Oil Corporation 2001 Stock Incentive Plan to be
executed this 5th day of June 2007. 



	

 	
 	
FOREST OIL CORPORATION
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/  CYRUS D. MARTER IV      
 Cyrus D. Marter IV
 Vice President, General Counsel &
Secretary













QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.1
**EXHIBIT
      23**








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**








We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
      333-129228 of Oak Hill Financial, Inc., of our report dated May 31, 2006
      appearing on this Annual Report on Form 11-K of the Oak Hill Financial, Inc.
      401(K) and Profit Sharing Plan for the year ended December 31,
      2005.








*/s/
      Grant Thornton LLP*








Cincinnati,
      Ohio


June
      29,
      2006
<PAGE>
 
              Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants
              ---------------------------------------------------

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Planar Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
(Nos. 33-82696 and 33-82688 and 33-90258) on Form S-8 of Planar Systems, Inc. 
and subsidiaries of our report dated November 8, 1996, relating to the 
consolidated balance sheets of Planar Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of 
September 27, 1996 and September 29, 1995 and the related statements of 
operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the 
three year period ended September 27, 1996, which report appears in the Annual 
Report on Form 10-K of Planar Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended 
September 27, 1996.  Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting 
for certain investments in debt and equity securities.

KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Portland, Oregon
December 23, 1996
# C_2014261EN.01001701.xml

| 11.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/17

---

Order of the President of the Court of 7 May 2014 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia, interveners: Kingdom of Belgium and Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-8/13) (1)

1

2014/C 261/25

Language of the case: Slovenian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 2.3.2013.

1

---
No. 45369.

#### Protests 893521-G, etc., of S. H. Kress & Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Butler*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303) the Rockingham-ware in question was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed.
No. 44425.

#### Protests 13854-K, etc., of Anglo American Trading Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Stokby*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358) it was held that 10 percent allowance should have been made for the weight of the gelatinous material in question.
No. 40580.

#### Protests 915852-G, etc., of Adlanco X-Ray Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2013147EN.01000803.xml

| 25.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 19 February 2013 — Società cooperativa Madonna dei Miracoli v Regione Abruzzo, Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali

(Case C-82/13)

2013/C 147/15

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Società cooperativa Madonna dei Miracoli

Appellant:

Respondents: Regione Abruzzo, Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali

Respondents:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is it the case that the European Commission has cancelled the grant of the Community contribution and what was the decision adopted?
  In the alternative: |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is it the case that the European Commission has cancelled the grant of the Community contribution and what was the decision adopted?

In the alternative:

| 2. | What legal effect is to be attached to the Commission’s failure to act, as a result of which the Community contribution was not paid? |
| --- | --- |

2.

What legal effect is to be attached to the Commission’s failure to act, as a result of which the Community contribution was not paid?

| 3. | Does the Commission’s failure to act by non-disbursement of the Community contribution preclude the application of Article 42(a) of Abruzzo Regional Law 31/82, under which the appellant was granted the regional contribution ancillary to the Community contribution and, consequently, [does that failure] preclude payment of the regional contribution?
  At all events: |
| --- | --- |

3.

Does the Commission’s failure to act by non-disbursement of the Community contribution preclude the application of Article 42(a) of Abruzzo Regional Law 31/82, under which the appellant was granted the regional contribution ancillary to the Community contribution and, consequently, [does that failure] preclude payment of the regional contribution?

At all events:

| 4. | What are the obligations incumbent on the Italian State in the case of the European Commission’s persistent failure to act? |
| --- | --- |

4.

What are the obligations incumbent on the Italian State in the case of the European Commission’s persistent failure to act?

---