alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

THOMAS VAIL, Appellant, vs. WARDEN WILLIAMS, Respondent. No. 68289 

# FILED JUN 1 7 2016

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying appellant Thomas Vail's postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Eric Johnson, Judge. Vail's petition was filed on December 31, 2014, more than one year after his judgment of conviction was entered on December 2, 2013. 1 See NRS 34.726. Thus, his petition was untimely filed. Vail failed to

Wail pleaded guilty to theft in the amount of $2,500 or more against a person 60 years of age or older and was sentenced to 26 to 72 months incarceration. The sentence was suspended and Vail was placed on probation. On December 30, 2013, the district court entered an amended judgment of conviction revoking his probation and imposing the underlying sentence.



# )6Q (01 1947ACherry



### niffia& Gibbo

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A demonstrate good cause and prejudice to excuse the untimely filing. 

### See

id. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2

Douglas



### cc: Hon. Eric Johnson, District Judge Thomas Vail Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

2 We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.



### 2
No. 40579.

#### Protests 941174-G, etc., of Biddle Purchasing Co. et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.2

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION


      K-III COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, a corporation organized and existing
under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation"),

     DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

     FIRST:  That  the  Board  of  Directors  of the  Corporation  duly  adopted
resolutions  setting forth and declaring  advisable a proposed  amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation of said Corporation:

          RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors hereby deems it advisable and in
          the best interests of the  Corporation and its  shareholders  that the
          Certificate of  Incorporation  of the  Corporation  (the "Charter") be
          amended by  deleting  Article  FIRST  thereof in its  entirety  and by
          substituting,  in lieu of said  Article,  the  following  new Article:
          "FIRST: The name of the Corporation is PRIMEDIA Inc.".

     SECOND:  That the stockholders holding a majority of all of the outstanding
shares of the Common Stock of the Corporation have given written consent to said
amendment  in  accordance  with the  provisions  of Section  228 of the  General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

     THIRD:  That the aforesaid  amendment to the  Corporation's  Certificate of
Incorporation  was duly adopted in accordance with the applicable  provisions of
Section  242 and  Section  228 of the  General  Corporation  Law of the State of
Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  said K-III Communications  Corporation has caused this
Certificate to be executed by Beverly C. Chell, its authorized  officer, on this
14th day of November, 1997

                                         By /s/ Beverly C. Chell
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Name:   Beverly C. Chell
                                            Title:  Vice Chairman & Secretary
Before the Third Division,

February 1, 1939

No. 40573.

#### Protest 603878-G of Julius Wile Sons & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

Th® appraiser reported that the merchandise consists of cheese sticks. On the authority of Abstract 17532 the claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 195 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 195

   To reinstate Federal matching of State spending of child support 
                          incentive payments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 26, 2011

 Mr. Reid (for Mr. Rockefeller (for himself, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Kohl, and 
  Ms. Snowe)) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To reinstate Federal matching of State spending of child support 
                          incentive payments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Child Support Protection Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT OF FEDERAL MATCHING OF STATE SPENDING OF CHILD 
              SUPPORT INCENTIVE PAYMENTS.

    Effective October 1, 2010, section 455(a)(1) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 655(a)(1)) is amended by striking ``from amounts paid to 
the State under section 458 or''.
                                 <all>
```
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 20 

To protect American job creation by striking the job-killing Federal employer 

mandate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. JOHANNS, Mr. WICKER, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. 

RISCH, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. BURR, Mr. COBURN, Mr. KIRK, Mr. CRAPO, 

Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. KYL, Mr. ENZI, Mrs. HUTCHISON, 

Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. COATS, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. 

ISAKSON, Mr. CORKER, and Mr. ALEXANDER) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To protect American job creation by striking the job-killing 

Federal employer mandate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Job Protec5 tion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROTECT JOB CREATION. 

7 Sections 1513 and 1514 and subsections (e), (f), and 

8 (g) of section 10106 of the Patient Protection and AffordVerDate Mar 15 2010 04:52 Jan 26, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S20.IS S20

rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 20 IS

1 able Care Act (and the amendments made by such sections 

2 and subsections) are repealed and the Internal Revenue 

3 Code of 1986 shall be applied and administered as if such 

4 provisions and amendments had never been enacted. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Craig A. Knock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Craig A. KnockCraig A. KnockVice-PresidentChief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer andChief Accounting Officer)August 12, 2005




39
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Direct Response Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rodney Ray, President and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities     
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                           
|(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
|condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                  





|\s\               Rodney Ray
|----------------------------
|Rodney Ray                  
|President                   
|                            
|September 27, 2002          



---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                        7,333,168
<SECURITIES>                  1,055,673
<RECEIVABLES>                 3,800,124
<ALLOWANCES>                  154,000
<INVENTORY>                   1,102,741
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              13,762,323
<PP&E>                        3,629,894
<DEPRECIATION>                2,053,388
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                17,383,178
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         5,798,176
<BONDS>                       90,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      561,614
<OTHER-SE>                    10,138,688
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  17,383,178
<SALES>                       54,863,574
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              54,863,574
<CGS>                         34,932,523
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 34,932,523
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            126,478
<INCOME-PRETAX>               1,672,315
<INCOME-TAX>                  922,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           632,315
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  632,315
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .09
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ATC Healthcare, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K/A for the year ending February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Savitsky,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

                   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and result
                  of operations of the Company.

/S/ DAVID SAVITSKY
-----------------------
David Savitsky
Chief Executive Officer
July 29, 2005

This certification accompanies this amended Report on Form 10-K/A pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.



                                       52
#### Joe Angelo SOTELO, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 1687-96.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

April 22, 1998.

Ward Casey, Fort Worth, for appellant.

Danielle A. Le Gault, Asst. Dist. Atty., Fort Worth, Matthew Paul, State’s Atty., Austin, for State.

*OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW*

PER CURIAM.

Our decision to grant the State’s petition for discretionary review to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in *Sotelo v. State,*931 S.W.2d 745 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1996), was improvident. Accordingly, the State’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.

McCORMICK, P.J., and MANSFIELD, KELLER and WOMACK, JJ., dissent.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 214 

To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to require oil polluters to pay 

the full cost of oil spills, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 27, 2011 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to require oil polluters to pay the full cost of oil spills, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Big Oil Bailout Pre5 vention Unlimited Liability Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF LIMITS ON LIABILITY FOR OFFSHORE 

7 FACILITIES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1004(a)(3) of the Oil Pol9 lution Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2704(a)(3)) is amended by 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 214 IS

1 striking ‘‘plus $75,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘and the liabil2 ity of the responsible party under section 1002’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 this section takes effect on April 15, 2010. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
KENDRICK WILLIAMS, Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondent.

____________________

2011-3113

______________________
Appeal from an Arbitrator’s decision in FMCS No. 10-50903 by Sidney S. Moreland.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

A

ARON L. M ARTIN , Martin & Kieklak Law Firm, of Fayetteville, Arkansas, argued for petitioner.

H ILLARY A. S TERN , Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With her on the brief were T ONY W EST
, Assistant Attorney General, J EANNE E. D AVIDSON
, Director, and B RIAN M. S IMKIN , Assistant Director.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (B RYSON
, C LEVENGER , and O’M ALLEY
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

February 14, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Smith International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Margaret K. Dorman, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date:  March 24, 2003                  /s/ Margaret K. Dorman
       ---------------                 ------------------------------------
                                       Margaret K. Dorman
                                       Senior Vice President,
                                       Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2175 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 

to provide for the trial of covered persons detained in the United States 

pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force and to repeal 

the requirement for military custody. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 8, 2012 

Mr. UDALL of Colorado introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2012 to provide for the trial of covered persons 

detained in the United States pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force and to repeal the requirement for military custody. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Due Process and Mili5 tary Detention Amendments Act of 2012’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2175 IS

1 SEC. 2. DISPOSITION OF COVERED PERSONS DETAINED IN 

2 THE UNITED STATES PURSUANT TO THE AU3 THORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE. 

4 Section 1021 of the National Defense Authorization 

5 Act for Fiscal Year 2012 is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘The disposi7 tion’’ and inserting ‘‘Except as provided in sub8 section (g), the disposition’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub10 section: 

11 ‘‘(g) DISPOSITION OF COVERED PERSONS DETAINED

12 IN THE UNITED STATES.—In the case of a covered person 

13 who is detained in the United States pursuant to the Au14 thorization for Use of Military Force, disposition under 

15 the law of war shall only mean the transfer of the person 

16 for trial and proceedings by a court established under Ar17 ticle III of the Constitution of the United States or by 

18 an appropriate State court. Such trial and proceedings 

19 shall have all the due process as provided for under the 

20 Constitution of the United States.’’. 

21 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR MILITARY CUS22 TODY. 

23 (a) REPEAL.—Section 1022 of the National Defense 

24 Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 is hereby repealed. 

25 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 1029(b) of 

26 such Act is amended by striking ‘‘applies to’’ and all that 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2175 IS

1 follows through ‘‘any other person’’ and inserting ‘‘applies 

2 to any person’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002**








The
      undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, **(i)** the Form
      10-QSB of Weststar Financial Services Corporation (the "Company") for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and **(ii)** the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates
      and for the periods presented therein.








**WESTSTAR
                FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION**Date:
                May 12, 2006
            By:
            /s/G.
                Gordon GreenwoodG.
                Gordon GreenwoodPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer












26
CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Gary Poe, certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of T.H. LEHMAN & CO., INCORPORATED;2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;4.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); andc)
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and6.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Date: June 25, 2004By:
/s/ Gary PoeGary PoePrincipal Financial Officerand Secretary