alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      23.0**














CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
      have
      issued our reports dated March 13, 2007, except for Notes I and Q, as to which
      the date is June 14, 2007, accompanying the consolidated financial statements
      and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
      financial reporting included in the Annual Report of United Financial Bancorp,
      Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent
      to
      the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statement
      of
      United Financial Bancorp, Inc. on Form S-8 (No. 333-138197, effective
      October 25, 2006).





/s/
      Grant
      Thornton LLP


Boston,
      Massachusetts


June
      14,
      2007
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 18 (Tuesday, January 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-1999]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Notice of public meeting and extended public review period on the 
Draft Environmental Assessment and Land Protection Plan for the 
Proposed Establishment of Clarks River National Wildlife Refuge, 
Marshall, McCracken, and Graves Counties, Kentucky

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting and extended public review period for 
the proposed establishment of Clarks River National Wildlife Refuge.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice advises the public that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service. Southeast Region, will hold a public meeting to answer 
questions and hear comments concerning its proposal to establish a new 
national wildlife refuge along the floodplain of the East Fork of the 
Clarks River in Marshal, McCracken, and Graves Counties, Kentucky. This 
notice also announces the Service's extension of the public review and 
comment period on the refuge proposal to March 14, 1997.

DATES: The Service will hold a public meeting at 7:00 p.m. on February 
20, 1997, at Benton Middle School, 906 Joe Creason Drive, Benton, 
Kentucky. The public review and comment period on the draft 
environmental assessment and land protection plan has also been 
extended to March 14, 1997.
    Written comments must be received no later than March 14, 1997, at 
the address below in order to be considered for preparation of the 
final environmental assessment.

ADDRESSES: Comments and requests for copies of the draft environmental 
assessment and for further information on the project should be 
addressed to Mr. Charles R. Danner, Team Leader, Planning and Support 
Team, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1875 Century Boulevard, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30345.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the proposed refuge is to 
protect, enhance, and manage approximately 18,000 acres of wetlands, 
bottomland hardwoods, and associated buffer areas along the East Fork 
of the Clarks River for the benefit of migratory and resident 
waterfowl, neotropical migratory birds, resident wildlife, and other 
species dependent on the river habitats of the area. A Draft 
Environmental Assessment and Land Protection Plan for the proposed 
refuge has been developed by Service biologists in coordination with 
the Kentucky Department of Wildlife and Fisheries and local county 
officials. The assessment evaluates three alternative actions and their 
potential impacts on the environment. The public is invited to attend 
the February 20 public meeting to ask questions and offer comments on 
the refuge proposal. Written comments are also welcomed and should be 
sent to Mr. Danner at the address noted above.

    Dated: January 21, 1997.
C. Monty Halcomb,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 97-1999 Filed 1-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          Mar-31-1997
<CASH>                                5,002,773
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                           327,377
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                             434,473
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      5,774,866
<PP&E>                                  127,385
<DEPRECIATION>                           83,287
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        5,829,356
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     42,273
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                 104
<COMMON>                                170,952
<OTHER-SE>                            5,616,027
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          5,829,356
<SALES>                                  45,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         45,385
<CGS>                                    26,120
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            26,120
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         51,911
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            387
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       11,231
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (722,553)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (722,553)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         291,756
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                           (414,346)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.02)
        

</TABLE>
Before the Third Division,

April 29, 1942

No 47131.

#### Protest 955056-G of Atlas Marine Supply Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of cylindrical and tubular tanks or vessels and that they are the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Atlas Marine Supply Co.*v. *United States*(29 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 165). In accordance therewith the drums in question were held entitled to free entry under, section 309 (a), Tariff Act of 1930, amended by section 5 (a), Customs Administrative Act of 1938.
EXHIBIT99.1

 

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

I, Lawrence A. Oberkfell, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of SureBeam Corporation (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify inaccordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as anexhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Dated: August 14, 2002 | /s/ Lawrence A. Oberkfell |
|------------------------|---------------------------|
|                   | Lawrence A. Oberkfell,    |
|                   | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

1

----
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1919 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide penalties for transporting 

minors in foreign commerce for the purposes of female genital mutilation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2011 

Mr. REID introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide penalties 

for transporting minors in foreign commerce for the purposes of female genital mutilation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Girls Protection Act 

5 of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TRANSPORT FOR FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION. 

7 Section 116 of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(d) Whoever knowingly transports from the United 

10 States and its territories a person in foreign commerce for 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1919 IS

1 the purpose of conduct with regard to that person that 

2 would be a violation of subsection (a) if the conduct oc3 curred within the United States, or attempts to do so, 

4 shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 

5 5 years, or both.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20258]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Joint Advisory Committee on Nuclear Weapons Surety; Meeting

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Joint Advisory Committee on Nuclear Weapons Surety will 
conduct a closed session on August 28, 1997, at Science Applications 
International Corporation, San Diego, California.
    The Joint Advisory Committee is charged with advising the Secretary 
of Defense, Department of Energy, and the Joint Nuclear Weapons Council 
on nuclear weapons systems surety matters. At this meeting the Joint 
Advisory Committee will receive classified briefings on the nuclear 
weapons stockpile and Department of Defense nuclear readiness.
    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act Pub. L. 
92463, as amended, Title 5, U.S.C. App. II, (1988), this meeting 
concerns matters, sensitive to the interests of national security, 
listed in 5 U.S.C. Section 552b(c)(1) and accordingly this meeting will 
be closed to the public.

    Dated: July 28, 1997.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-20258 Filed 7-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
Third Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.9(b) 
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this
“Amendment”) is made and entered into effective as of June 15, 2007 by and between HELIX BIOMEDIX, INC., a Delaware corporation (“Helix”), and R. STEPHEN BEATTY (“Executive”). 
 RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, Helix and Executive
entered into an Employment Agreement effective July 1, 2003, as amended (the “Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, Helix and Executive
wish to further amend the Agreement as provided herein. 
 AGREEMENT 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the mutual covenants of the parties hereinafter set forth and other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 1. The last sentence of
Section 5(b) of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
 “Executive will have the duty to
mitigate the costs to the Company by attempting to obtain other employment within a reasonable time after termination. During the period Executive is entitled to receive severance payments hereunder, the monthly payment otherwise due from the
Company shall be reduced by fifty percent (50%) of Executive’s monthly compensation from such other employment.” 
 2.
Section 3(e) of the Agreement is hereby amended to add the following provisions: 
  

	 	(2)	Company will maintain a policy of insurance for directors’ and officers’ liability with such coverage as may be determined by the Board. Executive will be included within
that policy of insurance with the premiums paid by Company. 

  

	 	(3)	For purposes of this Section 3(e), vacation shall not include time spent by Executive at events attended by (i) persons who hold or represent the holders of at least 20%
of the Company’s outstanding voting stock; or (ii) any person with whom the Company has an existing Consulting Agreement as long as a material purpose of such time is Company-related. The Company hereby acknowledges that Executive intends
to attend certain national bridge-related events during each year at which a significant percentage of the Company’s current stockholders are present. The Company encourages such participation by Executive and hereby acknowledges that it will
reimburse Executive for the reasonable costs of attending such events and that the time associated with such events will not be considered as vacation. The Company reserves the right to review this situation on a year-by-year basis.


 3. The effective date of this Amendment shall be June 15, 2007. 
 4. The parties hereto hereby acknowledge the continuing effect of the Agreement except as specifically modified by this Amendment. 
  

 1 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above
written. 
  

									
	HELIX BIOMEDIX, INC.	 		 	EXECUTIVE:
					
	By:	 	/s/ Jeffrey A. Miller	 		 		 	/s/ R. Stephen Beatty
		 	Jeffrey A. Miller, Ph.D	 		 		 	R. Stephen Beatty
		 	Director	 		 		 	

  

 2
No. 44412.

#### Protests 882222-G, etc., of S. Holst-Knudsen (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Stokby*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358) it was held that 10 percent allowance should have been made for the weight of the gelatinous material in question.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20694]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3205-000]


Utilicorp United, Inc.; Notice of Filing

July 31, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 23, 1997, Utilicorp United, Inc., tendered 
for filing an amendment in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before August 12, 1997. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20694 Filed 8-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2336 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2336

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4'-methoxy-2,2',4-
                        trimethyl diphenylamine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 23, 2012

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4'-methoxy-2,2',4-
                        trimethyl diphenylamine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4'-METHOXY-2,2',4-TRIMETHYL DIPHENYLAMINE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.35 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 4'-methoxy-2,2',4-trimethyl 
diphenylamine) is amended by striking the date in the effective period 
column and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Y. Shiwo & Co., c/o Universal Foreign Service Co. *v.*United States

No. 6238.

Invoice dated Kobe, Japan, May 24, 1935.

Entered at Los Angeles, Calif., June 11, 1935.

Entry No. 8834.

(Decided December 4, 1945)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General, attorney for the United States, subject to the approval of the court, as to merchandise covered by the reappraisement appeal enumerated above:

> (1) That this stipulation is limited to so much of said merchandise as is described in the invoice as clams in 5-ounce tins or cans and marked "A” and initialed GRG by Examiner G. R. Guliek; said articles being appraised on the basis of the American selling price in accordance with the Presidential proclamation published in T. D. 47031.'

> (2) That such merchandise is the same in all material respects as the imported clams involved in *United States*v. *Mutual Supply Co. et al.*and *Mutual Supply*
>       *468
>       *Co. et al.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 5950, and that the issues herein are the same in ail material respects as the issues involved in said decision.

> (3) That upon the dates of exportation to the United States of the merchandise covered by this appeal, like or similar merchandise manufactured or produced in the United States was being freely offered for sale and sold to all purchasers in the principal market of the United States, in the ordinary course of trade, and in the usual wholesale quantities, including all containers and coverings and all costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for delivery, at the following prices per dozen cans or tins, less a cash discount of 1% per centum:

> *5-ounce size*

> January 1, 1934 to May 31, 1935_$1. 00

> June 1, 1935 to November 30, 1936_• .90

> (4) That the record in said Reap. Dec. 5950 may be incorporated herein, and that upon this stipulation this appeal may be'’deemed submitted, it being abandoned as to all merchandise not marked *“A”*on the invoice as above indicated.

On the agreed facts I find tbe American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402 (g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise described on the invoice as clams in 5-ounce cans or tins, marked “A” and initialed GRG by Examiner G. R. Gulick, and that such value was $1 per dozen, less *lji*per centum cash discount.

The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeal is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donald Bennett, Appellant.

[614 NYS2d 346]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not err in refusing to charge assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00 [3]) as a lesser included offense of assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10 [1]). There is no reasonable view of the evidence from which the jury could conclude that defendant committed the lesser but not the greater offense *(see, People v Glover,*57 NY2d 61, 63). In any event, defendant was convicted of the higher offense of assault in the first degree and acquitted of the two lower offenses of assault in the *1057second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [2], [4]) charged as lesser included offenses. Were there error in failing to charge the lesser offense of assault in the third degree it, would be harmless *(see, People v Green,*56 NY2d 427, 435). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Doyle, J.—Assault, 1st Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.
No. 44423.

#### Protests 19764-K, etc., of Dal, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Stokby*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358) it was held that 10 percent allowance should have been made for the weight of the gelatinous material in question.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20713]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-661-000]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

July 31, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 24, 1997, Northwest Pipeline Corporation 
(Northwest), P.O. Box 58900, Salt Lake City, Utah 84158-0900, filed in 
Docket No. CP97-661-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205, 
157.211, and 157.216 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural 
Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 157.211 and 157.216) for authorization to 
construct and operate modified replacement facilities and abandon 
certain obsolete facilities located in Yakima County, Washington, under 
Northwest's certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-433-000, pursuant to 
Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the 
request that is on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    Northwest proposes to modify the Yakima Firing Center Meter 
Station, located in Yakima County, Washington, by replacing the two 
existing 1-inch regulators with two new 1-inch regulators, the existing 
4-inch positive displacement meter with a new 3-inch turbine meter, the 
existing 30,000 Btu per hour heater with a new 100,000 Dth per hour 
heater, and the existing 2 x 3 relief valve with a new 2 x 3 full bore 
relief valve and appurtenances. Northwest declares as a result of the 
described modifications, the maximum design capacity of the meter 
station will increase from approximately 483 Dth per day to 
approximately 1,222 Dth per day at 150 psig, as limited by the 
regulators. Northwest asserts the modifications will more efficiently 
accommodate existing firm maximum daily delivery obligations at this 
delivery point to Cascade Natural Gas Corporation.
    Northwest states that the total cost of the proposed facility 
replacements at the Yakima Firing Center Meter Station is estimated to 
be $101,375, comprised of $98,375 for installation of new facilities 
and $3,000 for removal of old facilities.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20713 Filed 8-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 00-897.

#### Galan, aka Prado *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.