### RECEIVt:U ·- 5PDL AIR PL!\HHING SEC.

SUSANA MARTINEZ Governor JOHN A. SANCHEZ Lieutenant Governor



### December 16,2013 Mr. Ron Curry Regional Administrator NEW MEXICO 

## 13 DEC 30 

## PH 6: 0 ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT 

### Office of the Secretary
Harold Runnels Building 1190 Saint Francis Dr., Santa Fe, NM 87505

PO Box 5469, Santa Fe, NM 87502-5469 Phone (505) 827-2855 Fax (505) 827-2836 www.nmenv.state.nm.us



### U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VI (6-RA) 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, TX 75202-2733

Dear Mr. Curry, RYAN FLYNN Cabinet Secretary-Designate BUTCH TONGATE Deputy Secretary



### On behalfofthe New Mexico Environment Department (NMED), I am pleased to submit to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the enclosed set ofamended state rules as support for a request for delegation ofauthority for certain federal New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards. On November 7, 2013, the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board adopted amendments to the following Parts ofthe New Mexico Administrative Code (NMAC): 20.2. 77 NMAC- New Source Performance Standards (amended to incorporate by reference federal requirements promulgated by EPA between January I, 2011 and September 23, 2013), and 20.2.82 NMAC- Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards for Source Categories ofHazardous Air Pollutants (amended to incorporate byreference federal requirements promulgated byEPA between January I, 2011 and August 29, 2013). NMED seeks delegation ofauthority from EPA for NSPS and MACT standards for the time periods indicated above, and in doing so, provides the following statements pursuant to the requirements of40 CFR § 63.91 (d)(2). EPA approved NMED's program for receiving delegation ofexisting and future Clean Air Act Section 112 standards when it granted final interim approval to ourTitle V program oq•November 18, 1994. NMED reaffirms that it still meets the criteria for receiving delegation ofSection 112 standards. NMED is seeking delegation ofNSPS and MACT Standards fpr**,bqt.IJ~jijtle** 

### V and non-Title V sources. \**·.·~. ~.}':.::**  

### '.:.**\~** ... 

### : \

### Mr. Ron Curry December 16, 2013 Page Two The hearing record for these revisions is enclosed, which includes the filed regulations, transcripts, exhibits, public notices, affidavits ofpublication, and the notice ofintent to testify. There were no public comments. Included with the attached hard copy ofthis submittal is an electronic copy ofthe submittal provided on disk, which I certify to be an exact duplicate ofthe hard copy. The State ofNew Mexico looks forward to receiving the EPA's approval ofthis delegation request, as well as our delegation requests made in 2007, 2009 and 2011 for NSPS, NESHAP and MACT rules. Ifyou have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Richard Goodyear ofNMED's Air Quality Bureau at (505) 476-4305.

Ryan Flynn Secretary Enclosures

cc: Tom Diggs, EPA Region 6 Richard Goodyear, NMED AQB Chief

### , ''!T' I**~** 

### '"'ITER 

## 2 IH' ' 1 'J 

# r·· 2= .:.

## 0 NMACTRANSMnTALFORM 1.24.10 NMAC [Sequence# ]**11. 1)** **~"'~ ~~-\-:**  . 

### "

.. .**:~~>** 

### . . . ..**-~ ~**  p).•
. : i**.~·~·· ~~** **~,** ' J ·I •• 1**~** . , t**~** t ' • "" ;<f' '

....!
. f\l,.!'\
.**~** - , .. 

## :2
.1Aie**~lfi&iA'l ·.** 

## ·,;::=-.)

### '4-. ,j Environmental Improvement Board 667

.3

. IAaen!!liAddress P.O

. Box 26110 1190 St. Frands Drive, Santa F e, New Mexico 87502

• 4. \ Oontact1Rerson Name Lany Weaver 

## IPhone# 

## I(505)476-4322 

## IFAX 

## J (505) 476-4375 E-mail Lany.weaver@state.nm.us 

## IS. Type ofRule.Action New 

# D Amendment 

# Q Renumber 

# D Repeal 

# D Emergency 

# D

I 19, 'NMA'C!Nf.lniber

_ Title JChapter 

### IPart 20 2 177

. J:O
. I NMAC'Name 

# .. Tltte 

## IChapter j Part Environmental Protection 1 Air Quality (Statewide) 1 New Source Performance Standards

:11. !Amendment!Descriptlon :1 2. t AmenBnient:SlNMA'COClltatfon Amend two sections 20.2.77 NMAC, Sections 2 and 9

.13. 'Most·r.ecent• flllng• dat e (lf;appllcable) 8 1 2011 I 

### 14
. · Are'there

.anv·materlalslncorporatedtby·reference7 Reference 1 Internetsite No Yes X Ple11se listiiltUchments 

### 1.http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/ 11ndInternet**s~(s)** II


### - -- ilppliCIIble 2. 3
.

:15
. 'Ifmatetlals · are attached ·has• copyr1ght " permlsslon !been :recelved? No

# I I 

# vesl 

# I Publicdomain

# I x l 16, .Legal cltatlon(s) :thatallows

.the.l'ssulqg..A_gencyto regulate

.and the

.IssuingAuthorlty

.to; pr.omutgate regulations on ·thls

.subject**(~r ovid** **all'that aee** **~}.** 74-1-5 NMSA 1978; 74-1-8 N'1SA; 

### Chapter 74, 

### Article 2 NMSA 1978

.17., Signature & Title of Issuing Authority (Delegatedauthority-mustbe on file ) Name: Deborah Peacock, Esq

Title:

# ~-

# ~**E~££** Sign ture

SRC-2000·02 5/26/2000 Check If delegated authority 

# 0
11 

# 1 7ll3 Oat/Signed,..,1'1•1**~U"** I' In ! '' : -'··. j ".i This is an amendment w 20.2.7'7 NMAC. Sections::; and 9. effective 1: 1 19 113.**20.1.77~2** SCOPE:**An~** stationar: suurce constructing or modifyin!_! and which is subject to the requirements ol'40 CfR Part 60. as amended through [Peeemi!er**~** L**2~19]** September 13. 2013. I ' 1

### 1**~I -~"~"!"'':fER**  f'-' t 

## 2• I nt • l ,__

[06'161<J5. I I'I9 197. 091081<J9: 20.2.77.2 NMAC • Rn 20 NMAC 2.17.1 01 It A. 06/23/00: A. 02'18'02; A. 06113103; A. 06.'15107: A. 08 1 17/09; A. 09102111: A. 12!19'13] l0.1.77.'1 AOOI'TION OF 40 CFR I' ART 60: Except as otherwise provided. the**nc~;** source performance standards us promulgated by the United States environmental protection agency, 40 CFR Pan 60, ao; amended in the Federal Register through [Deeember 31. 2Cllllj**~ember** 23. 2013 arehereby incorporated into this part [20.2.77 NMAC]. [06.'16i95. 0&/021<J6. 11119/97. 09!08'99: 20.2.77.9 NMAC • Rn 20 NMAC 2.77.107 & A. 06102'00: A. 02118/02: A. 06113103: A. !J6il5!07: A. 08 1 17109: A. 09/02/11: A. 12/19'13]

20.1.77 NM/\CTITLE 20 CHAPTER2 PART77 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AIR QUALITY (STATEWIDE) NEWSOURCEPERFORMANCESTANDARDS 20.2.77.1 ISSUING AGENCY: New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board. [06/16/95; 20.2.77.1 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.77.100 06/23100] 20.2.77.2 SCOPE: Any stationary source con•iructing or modifying and which is subject tothe requirements of40 CFR Part60, as amended through September 23, 2013. [06/16/95, 11-19-97, 9-8-99; 20.2.77.2 NMAC- Rn 20NMAC 2.77.101 & A, 06/23/00; A. 02/18102; A, 06/13103; A, 06/15107; A. 08/17/09; A, 09/02/11; A. 12119/13] 20.2.77.3 STATIJfORYAlJTHORITY: The em1ronmenta1 improvement board "shall promulgate regulations and standards in
...airquality management" (NMSA 1978, Section 74-1-S.A) and "regulations adopted by the environmental improvement board
...shall
...ensurethat regulations and standards under
...the federal act will not be violated." (NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-?.B). (06/16195; 20.2.77.3 NMAC- Rn, 20NMAC 2.77.102 06/23/00] 20.2.77.4 DURATION: Permanent. [06116195; 20.2.77.4 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.77.103 06/23100) 20.2.77.5 EFFECTIVE DATE: June 16, 1995, except where a later date iscited atthe end ofa section or paragraph. (06116/95, 08102/96; 20.2.77.5 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.77.104 6123/00) [The latest effective date ofany section in this part is 12/19/13) 20.2.77.6 OBJECTIVE: The objective ofPart 77 ofChapter2 isto adopt or establish state authority to implement new source perfonnance standards for stationary sourcesinNew Mexico subject to 40 CFR Part 60. [06116195; 20.2.77.6 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.77.105 06/23/00] 20.2.77.7 DEFINITIONS: [RESERVED) [20.2.77.7 NMAC- N, 06123/00) 20.2.77.8 AMENDMENT AND SUPERSESSION OF PRIOR REGULATIONS: Thispart amends and supersedes Air Quality Control Regulation (AQCR) 750, last filed on April!O, !994. All references to AQCR 750 in any other rule shall be understood as a reference tothis part. [06/16/95; 20.2.77.8 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.77.106 06123/00] 20.2.77.9 ADOPTION OF 40 CFR PART 60: Except asotherwise provided, the new source performance standards as promulgated by the United States environmental protection agency, 40 CFR Part 60, as amended in the Federal Register through September23, 2013 are hereby incorporated into thispart [20.2.77 NMAC]. [06/16/95, 08/02/96, 11/19/97, 09/08/99; 20.2.77.9 NMAC- Rn 20 NMAC 2.77.107 & A. 06102/00; A, 02118/02; A, 06/13/03; A. 06115107; A, 08117/09; A. 09/02/ll; A, 12119/13) 20.2.77.10 MODIFICATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS: The following modifications or exceptions are made to the incorporated federal standards. A. Amend 40 CFR Part 60, Section 60.2, Definitions, as follows: Forthe purposes ofdelegation of authority whichthe administrator oftheUnited States environmental protection agency may, in his discretion, delegate to the secretary ofthe New Mexico environment department, "administrator" means the secretary ofthe department or his authorized representative. B. Exclude40 CFR- Part 60, Subpart AAA- Standards ofPerformance for NewResidential Wood Heaters. C. The federal standards ofperformance i11corporated by this regulation shall not be subject to NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-8 (Variances). D. Exclude 40 CFR Part 60, SubpartHHHH, Emission Guidelines and ComplianceTimes for CoalFired Electric Steam Generating Units. 20.2.77NMAC I[06/16/95; 20.2.77.10 NMAC- Rn, 20NMAC 2.77.108 06/23/00; A, 06115/07] 20.2.71.11 DOCUMENTS: Documents incorporated and cited in this Part may beviewed at theNew Mexico environment department, air quality bureau, 1301 Siler Road, Building B, Santa FeNM, 87507. [06116/95; 20.2.77.11 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.77.109 06/23/00; A, 08/17109] [As ofApril2013, the airquality bureau is located at 525 Camino de los Marquez, SantaFeNM, 87505] HISTORY OF 20.2.77 NMAC: Pre-NMAC History: The material in this part was derived from that previously filed with the Commission of Public Records·State Records Center and Archives. EIBIAQCR 750, Air Quality Control Regulation 750- New Source Performance Standards, 07/24/84. EIB/AQCR 750, Air Quality Control Regulation 750- New Sour<:e Performance Standards, 08118187. EIBiAQCR 750, Air Quality Control Regulation 750- New Source Performance Standards, 07107/88. EIBIAQCR750, Air Quality Control Regulation 750- New Source Performance Standards, 04/27189. EIB/AQCR 750, Air Quality Control Regulation 750- New Source Performance Standards, 05/29/90. EIB/AQCR750, Air Quality Control Regulation 750- New Source Performance Standards, 04/22191. EIB/AQCR 750, Air Quality Control Regulation 750- New Source Performance Standards, 04/14/92. EIB/AQCR 750, Air Quality Control Regulation 750- New Source Performance Standards, 04/21193. EIB/ AQCR 750, Air Quality Control Regulation 750 -New Source Performance Standards, 04/12/94. History ofRepealed Material: [RESERVED] Other History: EIB/AQCR750, Air Quality Control Regulation 750- New Source Performance Standards, filed 04/12/94 was renumbered into first version ofthe New Mexico Administrative Code as 20 NMAC 2.77, New Source Performance Standards, filed 05/17/95. 20 }.'MAC 2.77, New Source Performance Standards, filed 05117/95, was renumbered, reformatted, amended and replaced by 20.2.77NMAC, New Source Performance Standards, effective 06123/00.

20.2.77 NMAC 2- I '!T'I 

## "'' 2: ,0 NMACTRANSMnTALFORM 1.24.10NMAC



## .: s. ,_ ,·I
- 

# . . P.O
. Box26110 1190 St Frands Drive, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87502
Name Lany Weaver 

## IPhone # 

## I(505) 476--4322 

### j FAX 

## I(505)476--4375 E·mall Lany

.weaverttstate.nm

.us**~·**

### .. 5. New 

# CJ Amendment 

# W Renumber 

# D Repeal 

# D Emergency 

# CJ**.fi.~~ cif;N.il1** **ll.~;;..t~ij11/07/2013**

## ll**~~ 1~.cllt8il12/19/2013**  

# i

,,**~**

### :9.Af~ber 

## IPart**~** Tltte Chapter 20 

## 1 2 l s2 

### 11,0. !HMAClHame '- 

# . TltJe j Chapter Part Environmental Protection 

### jAirQualtty (Statewide) Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards for SourcecategoriesofHazardous Air Pollutants

. 11

...**oMatDtion** 

## . :l;n

..

/ Amenclm.nt'aiNMAQ'at.tfon 

# . - Amend two sections 20.2.82 NMAC, Sections 2 and 8 13. 'Mostreaent"flOna dllte:llfUDIIcableJ**~** 8 1 2011 I '1.4. :are• tttere·anv**matert.~t ~**  l'bueferenc:e? - 

# ·- Reference 1 Internetsite No Yes X PltJutttHstlttM:Itments 1. 

### http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/



### - 

## -- lindJlfttlmet$}te(l) , •pp/ialbh 2. 3. l:S.**lf m.terials**  11re

.attac:heil 'tia• aoDvrtaht• Def1111ssion•been received? No j 

# I Yesj 

# I Publicdomain

### j X 

# I '16. • Legal dtation(s) that

.allow•**the Iau/IIJI'A~m:ytD**  regulate and the:Issulng'AuthDrlty.tD promulgate regul1tJons.onthis**aLi~ec:t** (Provideall

.that**a~lt:) ·**  · 

### 74-1-5 NMSA 1978; 74-1-8 NMSA; chapter 74, Article 2 NMSA 1978

.17 • .

### Signmue· •**Tl~** ofluulna Authorityi (o./egsnrd•utlwrftymustbe onHis)


# ·----· 

# - Name: Deborah**Peaco~ ~**  Check If delsgab?d**Title:~ .**  

### 1\ iiUthorlty 

# D

# lt~dt3

# ChL~~k Sl§"nlfture tlateSigned

SRC·20Q0-02 5126/2000 )This is an amendment to 20.:!.82 NMAC. Sections:! and 8, effective 12/19/13.**~. 1**  '..

### .'ITH**,~-::··~'ITER**

20.2.82.2 SCOPE: All sources emitting hazardous airpollutants. which are subject to the requirements of 40 CFR Pan 63. as amended through [bleeeml!er; I. 20 10] August 29. 2013. [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.2. 08'14/98: A. 08114/98.09108/99:20.2.82.2 NMAC- Rn. 20 NMAC 2.82.101 & A. 06'23100: A. 02/18102: A, 06/13/03: A. 06/08/07: A. 08117/09: A, 09/02111: A. 12119/13] 20.2.82.8 ADOPTION OF 40 CFR PART 63: Except as otherwise provided in section 20.2.82.10 NMAC (below). the national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for source categories as promulgated by the US EPA, 40 CFR Pan 63, as amended in the Federal Register through [9eeemeer : I, 29IOJ August 29. 20 13 are hereby incorporated into this pan (20.2.82 NMAC). [Rn. 20 NMAC 2.82.7, 08114'98: A. 08!14/98. 09/08'99; 20.2.82.8 NMAC- Rn. 20 NMAC 2.82.106 & A. 06/13100: A, 02118102: A. 06/13/03; A. 06108107; A. 08117/09; A. 09/02111: A. 12119113]

20.2.82 NMACTITI.E20 CHAPTER2 PART82 ENVIRONMENT AI. PROTECTION Am QUALITY (STATEWIDE) MAXIMUM ACHIEVABLE CONTROL TECIL"!OLOGY ST AJ'Il)ARDS FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES OF HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTAJ,.TS 20.2.82.1 ISSUING AGENCY: NewMexico Environmental Improvement Board. [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.1, 08/14198; 20.2.82.1 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.100 06/23100] 20.2.82.2 SCOPE: All sources emitting hazardous airpollutants, which are subject to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, as amended through August 29, 2013. [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.2, 08/14198; A, 08/14198, 09108199; 20.2.82.2 NMAC • Rn 20 NMAC 2.82.101 & A, 06123100; A, 02/18102; A, 06/13/03; A, 06/08107; A, 08117/09; A, 09/02111; A, 12119113] 20.2.82.3 STATUTORYAUTHORITY: Environmental Improvement Act, NMSA 1978, Section 74-1-8 (A) ( 4) and (7), and Air QualityControl Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 74-2-1 et seq., including specifically, Section 74-2-5 (A), (B} and (C). Section 74-2-5 (C) provides that "regulations adopted bythe environmental improvement board may prescribe standards ofperformance for sources and emissions standards for hazardous airpollutants
..." [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.3, 081!4/98; A, 08114/98; 20.2.82.3 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.102 06123/00] 20.2.82.4 DURATION: Permanent. [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.4, 08/14198; 20.2.82.4 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.103 06/23/00] 20.2.82.5 EFFECTIVE DATE: November27, 1994, except where a later date is cited at the end ofa section or paragraph. [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.5, 08/14/98; A, 08114198; 20.2.82.5 NMAC • Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.!04 06/23100] [The latesteffective date ofany section in this part is 12/19/13] 20.2.82.6 OBJECTIVE: The objective ofthis part is to adopt orestablish state authority to implement emission standards for hazardous air pollutants fur the source categories in New Mexico subject to federal standards. The US EPA requires New Mexico to adopt such standards in order to implement requirements in Section 112 ofthe Clean Air Act. [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.6, 08/14/98; A, 08114/98; 20.2.82.6 ]'..'MAC· Rn, 20NMAC 2.82.105 06123100] 20.2.82.7 DEFINITIONS: [Reserved] [20.2.82.7 NMAC • Rn, 20NMAC 2.82.107 06/23/00] 20.2.82.8 ADOPTION OF 40 CFRPART 63; Except as otherwise provided in section 20.2.82.10 NMAC (below), the national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for source categories as promulgated bythe US EPA, 40 CPR Part 63, as amended in the Federal Register through August 29, 2013 are hereby incorporated into this part (20.2.82 NMAC). [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.7, 08/14/98; A, 08/14/98, 09/08/99; 20.2.82.8 NMAC · Rn 20 NMAC 2.82.106 & A, 06/23/00; A. 02/18/02: A, 06113103; A, 06/08/07; A, 08/17/09; A, 09/02111; A, 12/19113] 20.2.82.9 SOURCES SUBJECTTO 40 CFR 63.40-63.44 OF SUBPART B (Constructed and Reconstructed Major Sources ofHazardous AirPollutants): The owneror operatorofa source subject to these provisions, thatwill be constructing or reconstructing after June 29, 1999, shall not oonstruct or reconstruct unless: A. the source has received a maximum achievable control technology (MACT) determination and approval from the department under this part; and B. the MACT determination and approval has been incorporated into a permitunder 20.2.72 NMAC

. Construction Permits or 20.2.70 NMAC- Operating Permits. [08/14/98; 20.2.82.9 NMAC Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.108 06/23/00) 20.2.82.10 MODIFICATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS: The following modifications orexceptions are made to the incorporated federal standards: A. general provisions: Amend 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A· General Provisions, Section 63.2, Definitions, as fullows: For the purposes ofdelegation ofauthority which the Administrator ofthe US EPA may, in 20.2.82 NMAChis or her discretion, delegate to the secretary ofthe New Mexico environment department, "administrator" means the secretary or his/her authorized representative. B. variances: The federal emission standards incorporatedby this Part shall not be subject to NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-8 (Variances). C. constructed and reconstructed major sources: The effective date for incorporation of40 CFR 63.40- 63.44 ofSubpart B under 20.2.82.8 NMAC shall be June 29, 1999. [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.8, 08/14/98; A, 08114/98; 20.2.82.10 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.109 06/23/00] 20.2.82.11 DOCUMENTS: Documents incorporated and cited in this part may be viewed at the New Mexico environment department, air qualitybureau, 1301 Siler Road, Building B, Santa Fe NM, 87507. [08/14/98; 20.2.82.11 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.110 06/23/00; A, 08/17/09] [As ofApril 2013, the air qualitybureau is located at 525 Camino de los Marquez, Santa Fe NM, 87505] HISTORY OF 20.2.82 NMAC: Pre-NMAC History: None. History ofRepealed Material: [RESERVED] Other History: 20 NMAC 2.82, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards For Source Categories OfHazardous Air Pollutants, effective 11127/94. 20 NMAC 2.82, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards For Source Categories OfHazardous Air Pollutants (filed I0/28/94) was renumbered, reformatted, amended and replaced by 20.2.82 NMAC, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards For Source Categories OfHazardous Air Pollutants, effective 06/23/00.

20.2.82 NMAC 2

### New Mexico Register 

### IVolume XXIV, Number 23 

### I December 13, 2013 849


### NEWMEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD 20.2.88 NMAC EMISSION STANDARDS FOR NEW MOTOR VEHICLES (filed 11/30/07) repealed 12/19/13. 

### NEWMEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD This is an amendment to 20.2.77 NMAC, Sections 2 and 9, effective 12/19/13. 20.2.77.2 SCOPE: Any stationary source constructing or modifying and which is subject to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 60, as amended through [Dcccmbct 31, *+&] September 23 2013. (06/16/95, 11/19/97, 09/08/99: 20.2.77.2 NMAC

- Rn 20 NMAC 2.77.101 & A, 06/23/00; A, 02/18/02; A, 06/13/03; A, 06115107; A, 08/17/09; A, 09/02/11; A, 12/19/13] 20.2.77.9 ADOPTION OF 40 CFR PART 60: Except as otherwise provided, the new source performance standards as promulgated by the United States environmental protection agency. 40 CFR Part 60, as amended in the Federal Register through [BcccmbCI 31, 2919] September 23 2013 are hereby incorporated into this part (20.2.77 NMAC]. (06/16/95, 08/02/96, 11/19/97, 09108199; 20.2.77.9 NMAC- Rn 20 NMAC 2.77.107 & A, 06/02/00; A, 02/18/02; A, 06/13/03; A, 06/15/07; A, 08/17/09; A, 09/02/11; A, 12/19/13] 

### NEWMEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD This is an amendment to 20.2.82 NMAC. Sections 2 and 8, effective 12/19/13. 20.2.82.2 SCOPE: All sources emitting hazardous air pollutants, which are subject to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, as amended through [BcecmbcJ 31,**~]August** 29 2013. (Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.2, 08114198; A, 08/14/98, 09108199; 20.2.82.2 NMAC

- Rn. 20 NMAC 2.82.101 & A, 06/23/00; A, 02/18/02; A, 06/13/03; A, 06108107; A, 08/17/09; A, 09/02/11; A, 12/19/13] 20.2.82.8 ADOPTION OF 40 CFR PART 63: Except as otherwise provided in section 20.2.82.10 NMAC (below), the national emission standards for 

# Adopted Rules
hazardousairpollutants for source categories as promulgated by the US EPA, 40 CFR Part 63, as wnended in the Federal Register through [Bcccmbct 31, 2818] August 29 ZQU are hereby incorporated into this part (20.2.82 NMAC). (Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.7, 08/14/98; A, 08/14/98, 09108199; 20.2.82.8 NMAC

- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.106 & A, 06/23/00; A, 02/18/02; A, 06/13/03; A, 06/08107; A, 08/17/09;A,09/02/11 ;A, 12/19/13] 

### NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND 

### FISH
TITLE 19 N A T U R A L RESOURCESANDWILDLIFE CHAPTER31 HUNTING AND FISHING PART4 FISHERIES 19.31.4.1 ISSUING AGENCY: New Mexico Department ofGame and Fish. (19.31.4.1 NMAC- Rp, 19.31.4.1 NMAC, 4-1-2014] 19.31.4.2 SCOPE: Sportfishing. Additional requirements may be found in Chapter 17 NMSA 1978 and Chapters 30 through 34 ofTitle 19 NMAC. (19.31.4.2 NMAC

- Rp, 19.31.4.2 NMAC. 4-1-2014] 19.31.4.3 S T A T U T 0 R Y AUTHORITY: 17-1-14 and 17-1-26, and 17-2-1 NMSA 1978, provide that the New Mexico state gwne commission has the authority to establish rules and regulations that it may deem necessary to carry out the purpose ofChapter 17 NMSA 1978 and all other acts pertaining to protected species. [19.31.4.3 NMAC- Rp, 19.31.4.3 NMAC, 4-1-2014] 19.31.4.4 DURATION: April I, 2014 through March 31, 2018. [19.31.4.4 NMAC- Rp, 19.31.4.4 NMAC, 4-1-2014] 19.31.4.5 EFFECTIVE DATE: April 1, 2014, unless a later date is cited at the end ofa section. (19.31.4.5 NMAC- Rp, 19.31.4.5 NMAC, 4-1-2014] 19.31.4.6 OBJECTIVE: Establishing open seasons, bag limits, and other rules pertaining to management and harvest of the fisheries resources of New Mexico. [19.31.4.6 NMAC- Rp, 19.31.4.6 NMAC, 4-1-2014] 19.31.4.7 DEFINITIONS: Specific terms as used in this regulation are defined. A. Boundary descriptions (I) "U.S.", as used in boundary descriptions herein, shall meanUnited States highway. (2) "N.M.", as used in boundary descriptions herein, shall mean New Mexico state road. (3) "I", as used in boundary descriptions herein, shall mean interstate highway. B. "Daylight hours" shall mean from one-half hour before sunrise to sunset. C. A "barbless" lure orHy shall mean an artificial lure made of wood, metal, orhard plastic oran artificialfly made from fur, feathers, other animal orman-made materials tied onto a hook to resemble or simulate insects, bait fish, or other foods. A fly orlure may only bear a single hook, from which any or all barbs must be removed or bent completely closed, or which are manufactured without barbs. Living or dead arthropods and annelids, or rubber or plastic moldings of these or other foods are not included. D. "Cbum"as used herein, is organic material that is not injurious to aquatic life and is used to attractfish. E. "Snagging" as used herein, is the intentional taking offish with hooks, gang hooks, or similar devices where the fish is hooked in a part ofthe body other than the mouth. F. "Bait fish"" is defined as those nongame fish which are not otherwise protected by statute or regulation. G. "'Angling" shall mean taking or attempting to take fish by hook and line, with the line held in the hand or attached to a pole or rod or other device that is held in the hand or closely attended. [19.31.4.7 NMAC- Rp, 19.31.4.7 NMAC. 4-1-2014] 19.31.4.8 TROUT WATERS AND WARM WATERS: A. Regular trout waters: The following are designated as regulartrout waters: All streams, lakes and ponds lying within the following described areas except licensed class A lakes and Jakes, ponds, and ranch tanks not fed by public waters and not open to public fishing. (1) Northern area: That portion of NewMexicobounded by a line starting atthe intersection of 1·25 with the Colorado-New Mexico state line and running south along 1-25 to its junction with U.S. 64; thence,

### STATE OFNEW MEXICO**E~ONMENTALUMPROVENmNTBOARD** 

### INTHEMATTEROFPROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO AIR QUALITY REGULATIONS 20.2.77 AND 20.2.82 NMAC


### PETITION FOR BEARING


### The Air 

### Quality Bureau inthe Environmental ProtectionDivision oftheNew Mexico Environment Department files this Petition withthe Environmental ImprovementBoard ("Board") to

### request ahearing for amendments to 

### the Air 

### Quality Regulations. Theproposed 

### amendments to existing rules are necessary to 

### incorporate newly promulgated federal standards 

### within programs for which authority has 

### been 

### delegated to

### New Mexico by 

### the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The Board is authorized to adopt

### these 

### regulations by

### the Air Quality Control Act, NMSA 1978, §

### 74-2-5. 

### A statement

### ofthe reasons 

### forthe regulatory change is 

### includedbelow. Therules with proposed amendments are attached as

### Attachments A and B. The Air 

### Quality Bureau 

### requests ahearing atthe November 2013 meeting 

### ofthe 

### Board. It 

### is anticipatedthatthe

### hearing forthis petition will take one (I) 

### hourorless.
Respectfully submitted, NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT 

# Q.**c:::?""~**

Bill Grantham Assistant General Counsel 1190 S. St. Francis

### Drive, SuiteN-4068 Santa

### Fe, NewMexico 87505 505.222.9594 

### bill.grantham@state.nm.us

### STATE OFNEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD IN THEMATTEROFPROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO AIR QUALITY REGULATIONS 20.2.77 AND 20.2.82 NMAC 

### No. 

## Em 13-Ql(R)
STATEMENTOFREASONS



### The purpose ofthe proposed amendments is to 

### incorporate by reference the new rules, corrections, revisions, and amendments to the federal New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and MaximumAchievable Control Technology Standards for Source Categories ofHazardous Air

### Pollutants (MAC1), 

### which were promulgated by

### the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and published inthe Federal Registerfrom January I, 2011 to August 29,2013. The sections ofParts 77 and 82 of20.2 NMAC affected by the proposed changes are shownbelow. The entirety ofParts 77 and 

### 82 with the proposed changes included are attached as Attachments A and Brespectively. A table listing EPA's revisions to 

### the NSPS and

### MACT standards since January I, 2011 is attached as Attachment C. The table will be updated ifadditional revisions are made before August 29, 2013. EPA has 

### indicated that it intends to revise the NSPS applicable to storage tanks 

### used in oil and natural gas production by 

### July 31, 2013. An 

### EPA fact sheet describing this anticipated action is attached as Attachment D. The Department proposes the following changes to 20.2.77 NMAC: 1. 10.1.77.1 SCOPE: Any slationary source constructing or modifying and which is subject to the requirements of40 CFRPart 60, a.s amended through [Qeeemi!OF l I,**~OIOJ** August 29.2013. [06/16/9S, 11-19-97, 9-8-99; 20.2.77.2 NMAC -Rn20 NMAC2.77.101 & A, 06/23/00; A, 02118102; A, 06/13/03; A, 06/1SI01; A, 08117/09; A, 09/02111; A, xxlxxlxx) 2. 10.2.77.9 ADOPTION OF40 CFRPART 60: Except a.s otherwise provided, the new source perfonnance standards a.s promulgated by the United States environmental protection agency, 40 CFR Part 60, a.s amended in the Federal Registerthrough [Qooemi!OF 31,**~QIOJ** August 29, 2QI3are hereby incorporoted into this part [20.2.77 NMAC]. [06/16/9S, 08/02196, I 1/19/97, 09/08199; 20.2.77.9 NMAC- Rn 20 NMAC 2.77.107 & A, 06/02100; A, 02118102; A, 06/13/03; A, 06/JS/07; A, 08/17109; A, 09/02111; A, xxlxxlxx) 

### The Department proposes the following changes to 20.2.82 NMAC: 1. 10.1.81.1 SCOPE: All sources emitting luwlrdous airpollutants, which are subjectto the requirements of40 CFRPart 63, a.s amended through [l)eeeml!or 31 12010jAugust 29, 2013. [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.2, 08114/98; A, 08/14/98, 09/08199; 20.2.82.2 NMAC- Rn 20 NMAC 2.82.101 & A, 06123/00; A, 02/18/02; A, 06/13/03; A, 06/08/07; A, 08/17/09; A, 09102111; A, xxlxxlxx]

Stetement ofRea.sons Page 1 of12. lO.l.8l.8 ADOPTION OF40 CFRPART 63: Exceptas otherwise provided in section 20.2.82.10NMAC (below), the national emission staDdards forhazardous airpollutaDts for source categories as promulgatedbythe US EPA, 40 CPR

### Put63, as amended Ill the Federal Registerthrougb (Qoe11Mor 31 1:IQIQj August

### 29, 2Q13are**h~by** iDcolporaled into this part(20.2.82 NMAC). [RD. 20 NMAC 2.82.7, 081141'98; A, 08/141'98, 09108199; 202.82.8 NMAC • RD 20 NMAC 2.82.106 & A, 06123/00; A, 02118/02; A, 06113/03; A, 06/08107; A, 08/17/09; A, 09/02111; A, xxlxxlxx]

StatementofReasons Page l ofl1 

### 2 

### 3 4 5 6 7 8 

### 9 10 11 

### 12 13 14 15 

### 16 17 18 

### 19 20 

### 21 22 

### 23 24 25 

### 26 27 28 29 30 

### 31 

### 32 33 34 35 

### 36 37 38 39 

### 40 

### 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 

## so 51 

### 52 53 54 55 

### 56 11TLE20 CIIAJ'TER2 PART77 

### A'ITACHMENJ' A ENVIRONMENTALPROTECI'ION AIRQUALITY (STATEWIDE) NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 20.2.77.1 ISSUINGAGENCY: New Mexico EnYiroi!IIleotal lmprovementBoard [06/16195; 20.2.71.1 NMAC -Rn, 20NMAC 2.77.100 06123100] 26.2.77.2 SCOPE: Any stationary source c:onstru<:ting or modifying and which is subjel:tto the requirements of40 CFRPert60, as amended lhrougb [.Geeemeer 31,2019] August**2~** 2013. [06/1619S, 11·19-97, 9-8-99; 20.2.77.2 NMAC • Rn 20 NMAC 2.77.101 &.

### A. 06123/00; 

### A. 02118102; A, 06/13/03; 

### A. 06115107;

### A. 08/17/09; A, 09102111] 2U77.3 STATUTORY AUTHORITY: TheenYironmental improvementboord "shall promulgate regulations and standards ln

...airquality llliiDllgemcnr• (NMSA 1978, Section 74-1-&.A}and "regulations adopted bythe environmental improvement boord
...sball
...ensure that regulations and standal:ds under

...lbc federal actwill not be violated." (NMSA 1978, Secdon74·2·7.B}. (06/16195; 20.2.71.3 NMAC • 

### Rn. 20 NMAC 2.77.102 06/23100] 20.2.77.4 DURATION: Pennancnt [06116195; 20.2.77.4 NMAC • Rn, 20 NMAC 2.77.I03 06123100] 20.2.77.5 EFFECI'IVEDATE: June 16, 1995, exceptwhere alater date is cited atthe and ofasection OT paragraph. [06/l619S, 08102/96; 20.2.77.5 NMAC • Rn, 20NMAC2.77.104 6/23/00] ['l'l!o latest effective date ofany section inChis part is September2, 2011] 20.2.77.6 OBJECTIVE: The objective ofPan77 ofChapter2 

### is to adopt orestablish state authority to implement new source perfOIIIWiee standords for stationarysources inNew Mexico subject to40CFRPan60. [06116195; 20.2.77.6 NMAC • Rn, 20 NMAC 2.77.105 06123100] 20.2.77.7 DEFINITIONS: [RESERVED] [20.2.77.7 NMAC •N, 06123100] 2U77.8 AMENDMENTAND SUPERSESSION OFPRIORREGULATIONS: This panamends and supersedes Air Quality Control Regulation (AQCR) 750, last filed on Apri110, 1994. All references to AQCR750 inany otherrule shall be understood as arcftrcnceto this 

### pan. [06116195; 20.2.77.8 NMAC • Rn, 20 NMAC 2.77.106 06/23/00] 20.2.77.9 ADOPTION OF40 CFR PART60: Except as otbcrwlse provided, the new source performance standards as promulgated by the United States environmeotal protection agency, 40 CFR Pan60, as amended in the Federal Register through [Qeeemeor 31, :1!119] August 29. 2013 arc hen:by lnco1J)01'81cd into this pan [20.2.77 NMAC]. [061l619S, 08102196, 11119/97, 09/08199; 20.2.77.9 NMAC • Rn 20 NMAC 2.77.107 &. 

### A. 06102/00; 

### A. 02/18102;

### A. 06113103; 

### A. 06/15107; A, 08117109; A, 09/02/11] 20.2.77.10 MODIFICATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS: The following modifications orexceptions arc made to the lnco1p01'81edfederal standatds. A. Amend 40CFRPan60, Section 60.2, Definitions, as follows: For lbcpurposes ofdelcgelion of authority which the administrator ofthe United Ststc:s eavironmentalprotection agency may, in his discretion, delegate to lbc secretary ofthe NewMexico environmentdepartment, "adtninlstrator" means the secretaryof the departmentorhis authorized representative. B. Exclude40CFR ·Pan60, SubpartAAA • Standards ofPerformance for New Residential Wood Heaters. C..The federal standatds ofperformance incorporatedby this regulation shall notbe subjecttoNMSA 1978, Section 74-2·8 (Variances}. D.**EX~>lude** 40 CFRPan60, Subpart HHHH, Emission Guidelines and Compliance Times for Coal· 20.2.77 NMAC I1 Fired Electric SteamGenerating Unils.[06/16/95; 20.2.77.10 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.77.108 06123100; A, 2**06115~7]** 

### 3 

### 4 20.2.77.11 DOCUMENTS: Documents ioCOipOI'aled

### and cited in this 

### Part

### may be viewed at theNew 5 Mexico environmentdepartment, air qualitybureau, 1301 SilerRoad, Buildio&B, SalllaFe NM, 87S07. 

### 6 [0611619S; 20.2.77.11 NMAC •

### 1\n, 20 NMAC 2.77.109 

### 06123100; A,**08117~9]** 

### 7 8 BISTORYOF:ZU77 NMAC: 9 Pre-NMAClllstory: nematerial in th!J partwas derived from that previously filed withthe Commission of 10 PubUc Reconb-Statc Rllcords Omtt:randArchiws. 11 EIBIAQCR7SO, Air Quality CODlrol Regulation 7$0 ·NowSource Performance Standards, 07/24/84. 12 ElBIAQCR750, AirQuality Control Regulllllon 750 ·NewSoun:e Perfonnance Staodarda, 08/18187. 13 EIBIAQCR 750, AirQualityControl Regulllllon 750 ·New SouruPerformance Staodarda, 07107/88. 14 EIB/AQCR 7SO, AirQuality Control Regulation 7SO ·NewSoun:e Pcrl"ormance Standards, 04127/89. 15 ElBIAQCR 7SO, Air QuaUty Control Regulation 750- New SouruPcrl"ormance StaodardJ, OS/29/90. 

### 16 Effi/AQCR7$0, Air Quality Control Regulation 750 ·New

### Source Ponbnnaoce Staodarda, 04122/91. 17 EIB/AQCR750, AirQuality Control Regulation 750 ·New Source Performance Staodanls, 04114192. 18 ElBIAQCR 7SO, Air Quality Control Regulation 7SO ·NewSoon:e Pcrl"ort118DCC Standards, 04121/93. 19 ElBIAQCR 1SO, AirQualityControl Regulation 750 ·NowSourcePerformance Slandards, 04/12194. 20 21 HlltGry ofRepealed Materilll: [RESERVED] 22 23 

### Other History: 24 EIB/AQCR 750, AirQuality Control Regulation 750 ·New Source Ponbnnaoce Standards, filed 04112194 was 25 reoumbered into first version oftheNew Mexico Administrative Code as 20NMAC 2.77, New Soun:e 26 Performance Starulards, liled 05/17/95. 27 20NMAC 2.77, New SourcePerformance Standards, filed OS/1119S, was reaumbered, reformatted, amettded 28 and replaced by20.2.77 NMAC. New Source Performance Standards, effective 061'23100.

202.77NMAC 21 2 

### 3 4 5 

### 6 1 8 

### 9 

### 10 11 

### 12 13 14 15 16 

### 17 18 19 

### 20 

### 21 22 23 24 25 

### 26 27 

### 28 

### 29 30 

### 31 

### 32 33 34 35 36 

### 37 38 39 40 

### 41 42 43 44 45 

### 46 47 48 49 50 

### 51 52 53 54 55 11TLE10 CHAPTER:! PART82 

### ATIACHMENTB
ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION AIR QUALITY (STATEWIDE) MAXIMUMACHIEVABLE CONTROLTECHNOLOGY STANDARDSFOR SOURCE CATEGORIES OFHAZARDOUS AIRPOLLUTANTS lO.l.82.1 ISSUINGAGENCY: New Mexico Envirol!lllel1lallmprovementBoard. [Rn. 20 NMAC 2.82.1,08114198; 20.2.82.1 NMAC • Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.100 06123/00) lO:U:U SCOPE: All sources emitting hazardous airpollutant:s, whieh are subjectto the requirements of 40 CFR Part63, as amendedthrough p;leuaJIIw

### at,2919] August 29.2013. [Rn. 20 NMAC 2.82.2, 08114.198;

### A. 08114.198, 09108199; 20.2.82.2 NMAC- Rn 20NMAC 2.82.101 & A, 06123100; 

### A. 02118/02; 

### A. 06/13/03;

### A. 06/08107; A, 08111109; 

### A. 09/f1l/11] l0.%.82.3 STATUTORYAUTHORITY: EnvironmcD!BI Improvement Act, NMSA 1978, SectioD 74-1·8 (A)(4) and (7), and AirQualityCDDtrol Act, NMSA 1978, Scetions 74-2-1 etseq., including speeifically, Scetioo 74-2-S (A), (B)BDd (C). Section 74-2-S (C) provides !bat "regulations adopted by the coviron.meDtal improvemcnt boatd may prescribe SUindards ofperfonnaru:e for sources and emissions standards for hazardous airpollutant:s
...» [Rn. 20 NMAC 2.82.3, 08114198;

### A. 08114198; 20.2.82.3 NMAC • Rn, 20 NMAC2.82.102 06123100] 10.2.82.4 DURATION: Permaocnt. [Rn. 20 NMAC 2.82.4,08114.198; 20.2.82.4 NMAC • Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.103 06123100] 20.2.82.5 EFFECfiVEDATE: November27, 1994, except where a later date is eited Illthe end ofa scetion orpal11gl11Pb. [Rn. 20NMAC 2.82.5, 08114.198; 

### A. 08114198; 20.2.82.5 NMAC • Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.104 06123/00) (The latesteffective date ofanyscetion inlhis part Is September2, 2011] 10.2.82.6 OBJECfiVE: Tbe objective oflhispartis to adopt orCS!IIblish stllte aulhorityto Implement emission staDdards for hszardous airpollutant:s for the source elltegories inNewMexico subjectto federal stal!dards. The US EPA requires NewMexico to adoptsuch standards in order to Implementrequiranent'llu Section 112 oflhe Clean AirAet. [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.6, 08114/98; 

### A. 08114.198; 20.2.82.6 NMAC • Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.10S 06123100) 20.2.82.7 DEFINITIONS: [Ruerved] (20.2.82.7 NMAC • Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.107 06123100] 10.2.82.8 ADOPTION OF40 CFRPART 63: Exceptas olherwise provided inscction20.2.82.10NMAC (below). the national entiSiionstal!dards fur hszardous airpollutantsfur source eBtesories as promulgated bythe US EPA, 40 CFR Part 63, as amended inthe Federal Registerthrough p;leBemllw :H, 2QI9] AUii!!St29. 2013 are berehy lucorp0111ted into Ibis part (20.2.82 NMAC). [Rn. 20 NMAC 2.82.7, 08/14.198; 

### A. 08114198, 09108199; 20.2.82.8 NMAC •Rn20 NMAC 2.82.106 & A, 061'23100; A, 02118102; 

### A. 06/13103; A, 06/08107; A, 08117109; A. 09102/11] 20.2.8:1.9 SOURCES SUBJEcrTO 40 CFR63.40• 63.44 OFSUBPART B (CDDstncted and ReeoMtrueted MajorSources orHazardou.s AirPolllttJnsts): The owner oroperator ofa source subjecttothese provisions, lhatwiU be CODStrueting orn.:onstructing 

### after June29, 1999, shall not constructorreconmuetlDlless: A. lhe source hasreceived a maximum achievable control teebnology (MACT) determination and approval from the department under Ibis part; and B. lheMACT detcrmiDalioD and approval has been incorporllted into a permitUDder 20.2.72 NMAC •CDDstruction Pormit'l or20.2.70 NMAC ·OperatingPermits. (08114198; 20.2.82.9 NMAC • Rn, 20 NMAC2.82.108 06123100] 20.2.112.10 MODIFICATIONSAND EXCEPTIONS: The followins modiliclllions orexceptions are made tolhclucorp0111ted federal standards: A. general provisions: Amend 40CPRPart 63, SubpartA ·GeneralProvisions, Section 63.2, 20.2.82 NMAC1 Definitions, as foUows: Forthe 

### purposes ofdelegation ofauthority which the Administratorofthe US EPA may, in 2 his orherdiscretion, delegate to the secn;taryofthe New Mexico environmentdepll1ment, "adminissratoomeans 3 the sectetaryorhisl1l.tr 8111horizedrepresentative. 4 B. variances: The federal emission slllndards inoorponl1ed by this Partshallnot he subject toNMSA 5 1978, Section 74·2·8 (Variances). 

### 6 C. coliSinletod and l"eCCOIS1l'Uttod major SO!Il'COS: The effective dato 

### tor incorponllion of40 

### CFR 7 63.40 • 63.44 ofSubpart B 1111der20.2.82.8 NMAC .shallbeJune 29, 1999. 8 [Rn, 20NMAC 2.82.8, 08/14198; A, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.10NMAC • Rn, 20NMAC 2.82.109 061231'00] 

### 9 10 20.2.82.11 DOCUMENTS: Documents incorporatedand cited In this partmay he viewed attheNew 11 Mexico environmentdepartment, airqualitybureau. 1301 Silerbad,Buildin&B, Santa Fe

### NM. 87S07. 

### 12 [08/14/98; 20.2.82.11 NMAC •Rn, 20NMAC 2.82.110 06123100; 

### A. 08/171119] 13 14 HISTORY OF211.2.82 NMAC: 15 Pre-NMAC Hl!lory: None. 

### 16 17 HI! toryofRepealed Material: [RESERVED] 18 19 OtherHlllory: 20 20 NMAC 2.82, MaxiiiiUm Achievable ControlTechnology Standards ForSource Categories otHazardOIIS Air 

### 21 Pollutams, effective IUl7/94. 22 20 NMAC 2.82, Maximum Acbit:vable ControlTechnology Standards For Source Categories otHazardOIIS Air 23 Polhllants {filed 10128194)

### was renumbered, reformattt:d, ameadod aad replaced by20.2.82 NMAC, Maximum 24 Acbiovablo Control Technology Standards For Solm){O Categories OfHazardous AirPoUutents, effective 06123100.

20.2.82 NMAC 2Attachment C- Ust ofAmendments to40CFR 60 and 63 Published in the Federal Registerfrom January 1, 2011 to August 29, 2013 Date ofFederal PDF name Repster 40CFRPart(s) 11tle I pages Standards ofPerformancefor Fossil-Fuel-Fired, Electric Utility, IndustrialCommerciaHnstitutlonal, and Small Industrial-commercial-InstitutionalSteam 2011·1008 1/20/2011 60 GeneratingUnits 8 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants FromthePortland Cl!ment Manufacturing Industry and StandardsofPerformance for Portland 2011·759 1/18/2011 60and63 Cl!ment Plants 6 National Emission Standards for HazardousAir Pollutants for Source Categories: GasoUne Distribution BulkTerminals, Buill: Plants, and Pipeline Facilities; and 2011·906 1/24/2011 63 Gasoline Dispensing Facilities 31 National Emission Standards for Hazardous AirPollutants: Gold Mine Ore Processing and Production Area Source Category; andAddition toSource Category 2011-2608 2/17/2011 63 Ustfor Standards 41 2011-4310 2/25/2011 60 Standards ofPerformancefor New Stationary Sources; Correction 1 National Emission Standards for HazardousAirPollutants for Reciprocating Internal 2011-5196 3/9/2011 63 Combustion Engines 11 National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous AirPollutantsforChemical 2011-5778 3/14/2011 63 ManufacturingArea Sources 2 Standards of Performancefor New StationarySources and Emission Guidelines for 2011-4491 3/21/2011 60 ExistingSources: SewageSludge Incineration Units 84 National Emission Standardsfor HazardousAir Pollutants for Area Sources: 2011-4493 3/21/2011 63 Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers 54 National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous AirPollutants for MajorSources: 2011-4494 3/21/2011 63 Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters 96 Standards ofPerformance for New StationarySources and Emission GuideUnes for 2011-4495 3/21/2011 60 Existing Sources: Commercial and Industrial 

### Solid Waste Incineration UnitS 88 Standards ofPerformance for New Stationary Sources and Emissions Guidelines for 2011-7899 4/4/2011 60 ExistingSources: Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators 9 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions: Group I Polymers and Resins; Marine TankVessel Loading Operations; Pharmaceuticals 2011-8168 4/21/2011 63 Production; andthePrintingand Publishing Industry 

### 38

1Attachment C- Ust ofAmendmentsto40CFR 60and 63 Published in the Federal Registerfrom January 1, 2011toAugust 29, 2013 DateofFederal 

### PDF name Register 40CF1tPart(s) Title 

## "paps National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants From thePortland Cement Manufacturing Industry and Standards ofPerformance for Portland 2011-12095 5/17/2011 60and 63 CementPlants 9 Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters and 2011-12308 5/18/2011 60and63 Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste lndneration Units 3 AmendmentstoNational Emission Standards for HazardousAir Pollutants for Area 2011-1S274 6/20/2011 

### 63 Sources: Plating and Polishing 10 StandardsofPerformance for StationaryCompressiOn Ignition and Spark.Ignition 2011-15004 6/28/2011 60 Internal Combustion Enslnes 26 2011-16462 6/29/2011 60 StandardsofPerformancefor NewStationarySources; Correction 3 National EmissiOn Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants From Petroleum 2011-17901 7/18/2011 63 Refineries; PartialWithdrawal ofFinal Rule 4 Amendmentsto National EmissiOn Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants forArea 2011-23806 9/19/2011 63 Sources: Plating and Polishing 11 National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions forPrimary lead 2011-292117 11/lS/2011 

### 63 Processing 27 National Emission Standardsfor HazardousAirPoRutantEmissions for ShlpbuDdins andShip Repair (Surface Coating); National Emission Standardsfor Wood Furniture 2011-29457 11/21/2011 63 ManufacturingOperations 27 National EmissionStandards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Area Source Standards 2011-32835 12/23/2011 63 for Prepared Feeds Manufacturing; Amendments 6 National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From Secondary lead 2011-32933 1/5/2012 63 Smelting 37 Incorporation ofRevised ASTM StandardsThat Provide Flexibifity in the Use of 2012-712 1/18/2012 60 Alternatives toMercury-Contalnlnslndustrial Thermometers 11 National EmissionStandardsfor Hazardous AirPollutantsfor Chemical 2012-1610 1/30/21>12 63 Manufacturing Area Sources 19 National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous AirPollutants From Coal- and Oil-Fired Electrk: UtilitySteam GeneratingUnits and Standards ofPerformancefor Fossil-fuel Fired Electric Utility,**lndustriai-Commercial-lnstitutlona~** andSmall Industrial2012-806 2/16/2012 60 and63 Commercial-InstitutiOnal Steam GeneratingUnits 211

2Attachment C- Ust ofAmendments to40CFR 60and 63 Publishedinthe Federal Register from January 1,2011 toAugust 29, 2013
Date ofFederal PDF name Resister 40CFR Part(s) Title I paps National Emission Standardsfor HazardousAir Pollutantsfor Polyvinyl Chlorideand 2012-6421 4/17/2012 63 COpolymers Production 102 National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants FromCoal andOii-F'ued Electric Utility Steam GeneratingUnits andStandardsofPerformancefor Fossil-Fue Ared Electric Utility,lndustrlai-Commen:lal-lnstitutlonal, andSmall Industrial2012-8703 4/19/2012 60and63 COmmercial-InstitutionalSteamGeneratingUnits; COrrection 11 Method 16CfortheDetermination ofT otal Reduced Sulfur Emissions From 2012·18513 7/30/2012 60 StationarySources 7 2012-19691 8/14/2012 60 New Source PerformanceStandardsReview for Nitric Acid Plants 16 Oil and Natural Gas Sector: NewSourcePerformance Standards and National 2012-16806 8/16/2012 60 and63 Emission StandardsforHazardousAir Pollutants Reviews 112 National Emission Standardsfor HazardousAir Pollutants FromthePulp and Paper 2012·20501 9/11/2012 63 Industry 18 StandardsofPerformancefor Petroleum Refineries; StandardsofPerformancefor Petroleum RefineriesforWhich Construction, Reconstruction, orModification 2012-20866 9/12/2012 60 commencedAfter May 14, 2007 60 National Emission StandardsforHazardousAir Pollutant Emissions: Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplatingand ChromiumAnodizingTanks; andSteel 2012·20642 9/19/2012 63 Pickling-HCI Process Fac!rltles andHydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants 35 National Emission Standardsfor HazardousAir Pollutants for Chemical 2012-30698 12/21/2012 63 ManufacturingArea Sources 26 National EmissionStandardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutantsfor ReciprocatingInternal COmbustion Engines; New Source Performance StandardsforStationary Internal 2013-0128& 1/30/2013 60and63 COmbustion Engines 52 National Emission Standardsfor HazardousAir Pollutants for MajorSources: 2012-31646 1/31/2013 63 Industrial, COmmercial, andInstitutional Boilers and Process Heaters 

## n National Emission Standardsfor HazardousAir Pollutants for Area Sources: 2012-31645 2/1/2013 63**Industria~** Commercial, and Institutional Boilers 36

3Attachment C

- list ofAmendments to40CFR 60 and 63 PublishedIn the Federal Registerfrom January 1, 2011 toAugust 29, 2013 Dateoffederal PDFname Rqlster 40CFR Part(s) lltle I 

### paps Commercial and Industrial SoUd Waste Incineration Units: Reconsideration and 2012-31632 2{7/2013 60 Final Amendments; Non-Hazardous Secondary MaterialsThatAre SolidWaste 103 National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous AirPollutants forthePortland Cement 2012-31633 2/12/2013 60and 63 Manufacturing Industryand StandardsofPerformance for Portland CementPlants 50 National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutantsfor Reciprocating lntemal 2013..01288- Combustion Engines; NewSource Performance StandardsforStationaryInternal

correction 3/6/2013 60and63 Combustion Engines; Correction 1
[Additional amendments will be added ifEPA publishes them by8/29/131

Total numberofpages: 1S79

4EPA's Air Rules forthe 0!1 &Natural Gas industry 

### PROPOSED UPDATES TO REQUIREMENTS FOR STORAGE TANKS USED IN OIL 

### AND NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION Tanks are used fortemporary storage ofliquids produced during in the oil and naturalgas production process, before those liquids are moved to apipeline, sold, or moved fordisposal. These storage tanks can 

### be sources ofemissions ofozone-forming volatile organic compounds (VOCs), along with several toxic air pollutants, including benzene. Storage tanks used In oil or natural gas production are subject to EPA's 2012 New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for VOCs ifthey have the potentialto emit 6or more tons ofVOCs ayear. SUMMARY OF ACTION
• On March 28, 2013, EPA proposed updatesto Its 2012 VOC performance standards for storage tanks used in crude oil and natural gas production to facilitate compliance with the standards and clarify requirements. The proposed changes reflect recent information showing that more higher-volume storage tanks will 

### be coming on line than the agency originally estimated.

• The updates would: adjust requirements for tanks built before today's proposal is published In the Federal Register; establish alternative emission limits fortanks where emissions have dropped; clarify test protocols for control equipment; clarifythetypes oftanks subjectto the rule; streamline compliance monitoring requirements while EPA addresses monitoring Issues raised in reconsideration petitions; and update requirements for submitting annual reports.

• The proposed updates respond to Issues raised in several petitions for reconsideration of the 2012 standards. The updates would provide timefor manufacturersto produce sufficient control equipment and will help ensure that responsible oil and natural gas production Is notslowed.

• EPA anticipates taking final action on today's proposal byJuly 31, 2013. The agency Is continuing to evaluate other Issues raised In the petitions and Intends toaddress those by the end of2014.

• EPA will accept public comment on this proposal for30 days after It is published In the Federal Register. The agency will hold a public hearing on the proposal If requested within


### ATTACHMENT Dfive days ofpubUcatlon.lnformation on submitting comments and requesting a hearing Is at the end ofthis fact sheet. THE PBOPQSfP UPDATES 

### ProposedAdjustmentsto ControlRequirements
• After Its 2012 final standards were Issued, EPA received supplemental Information that led the agency's to revise Its estimate ofstorage tanks thatwould be subject tothe rule. Based on that Information, EPA now believes there will not be sufficient control equipment available for tanks to meet an Oct.15, 2013 deadline for storage tanks 

### to control VOC emissions by 95 percent.

• In lightofthat information, EPA is proposing 

### to address storage tanks In two groups in order tofocus the limited control equipment currently available on the tanks likely to have the highest emissions. o Group 1 tanks: Emissions from tanks generally decline overtime, because the amount of liquid that moves through the tank declines as production from awell slows. For tanks constructed between Aug. 23, 2011 and the date today's proposal is published in the Federal Register, EPA Is proposing atwo-part requirement: • Tank owners/operators would have until Oct. 15, 2013 to report that the tank Is on line and provide the tank's geographic coordinates. • Ifthere Is achange that potentially would Increase the tank's emissionssuch as the addition of awell supplyingthe tank orthe refracture ofan existing well •• the owner

### Ioperator would have to Install controls to reduce VOC emissions by 95 percent within 60 days ofthe change or byApril15, 2014, whichever Is later. o GroupZ

### tonics: Tanks that come online aftertoday's proposal is published In the Federal Registerwould have to have controls to reduce VOC emissions by95 percent In place by April15, 2014 orwithin 60 days afterstartup, whichever is later. ProposedAltemotlve Emissions 

### Umlt
o EPA also Is proposing an alternative emissions limit for storage tanks that would allow owners/operators to either: 1) Reduce VOC emissions at atank by 95 percent, as required in the original rule; or 2) Demonstrate emissions from atank have dropped to less than 4tons peryear of VOCS without emission controls.

2

### o This alternative limitwould reflectthe decline In emissions that occurs at mosttanks overtime and allow owners/operators to shift control equipment tohigher-emittingtanks. • To qualifyfor this emissions limit, owners/operators would have to

documentthatemissions had been below4tonsfor at least 12 consecutive months. o Ifemissions increase (at or above the 4ton-per-year limit), owners/operators would have 30 days to meetthe 95 percent reduction requirement. Clarifying tt:stprotocolsforcontrolt:qulpmt:nt


### • The 2012 NSPS allows owners/operators to use manufacturer-testedemission control device models (combustors) that have been demonstrated to reduceVOC emissions from storage tanks by 95 percent, ratherthan requiring field performance testing of

### these devices. • Today's proposal aligns the protocol that emission control manufacturers must use In testing thecontrolswith the testing protocol required In EPA's 2012 airtoxlcs regulations for storagetanks. • EPA also is proposing to allow tank owners/operators to use control devices that are designed to reduce VOC emissions by 95 percent, while theagency reviews issues raised In thereconsideration petitions related tofield testing protocol requirements. EPAexpects to 

### address this Issue bytheend of2014.**R~nfl** Monttodnfl Rt:qulrements/Propost:dRt:qulremt:ntsfor Tanks 

### ThatAlready

### HINt: Controls


### • The 2012 final NSPS required thattankowners/operators conduct a performance test and use a continuousparametric monitoring system (CPMS) to demonstrate thattheyare meeting requirements to reduce VOC emissions from tanks by 95 percent. • Several reconsideration petitions have saidthis requirement Is overly strict, based on the large number ofstorage tanks affected each year, and the remoteness ofmany ofthe well sites where thetanks are located. EPA is continuingto evaluatethis Issue and will address It by the end of2014. o EPA is proposingto streamline compliance and monitoring requirements for tanks that have already Installed VOC controls while the agency completes its evaluation ofthemonitoring issue. o For tanks with controls, the proposal would require monthly inspectionsofcovers, closed-vent systems and control devices. This step Is expected to minimize VOC

### emissions by leading to promptrepairs, while requiring little orno specialized monitoring trainingorequipment. Records oftheseinspections, 

### which can 

### be conducted by personnel vlsltlngthe tank site for otherwork, must 

### be kept on site. 

### Tanks Subject

### to theRule:
• The proposed rule clarifies the type ofstorage tank that is subjectto the NSPS. Tanks that are considered •affected sourcesN would have VOC emissions of6or more tons peryear and are used to storecrude oil, condensate, unrefined petroleum liquids known as uintermediate hydrocarbon liquids/ and produced water. Fuel tanks, for example, are not covered by these rules.

• Storage tanks subjectto the rule may be 

### located anywhere along theoil and natural gas production process: from the natural gas well to the pointwhere gas entersthedistribution system; atany point from thewell to thepointwhere oil is transferred to the pipeline for crude oil production. Storage tanks located at refineries are not covered by this rule. Timing

### of AnnualReports


### • The2012 final NSPS required that owners/operators submit an annual reporton well completions, along with Information on storage tanks and otherequipment constructed or modified during theyear. The rule gave owners/operators 30 days tosubmitthereport, which must be 

### certified by a seniorcompany official. Several of

### the reconsideration petitions notedthat 30 days Is not enough time to compile the required Information and havethe report signed by the senior official. EPA is proposing togive owners/operators90 days to submit this report. REQUESTING APUBUC HEARING/HOWTO COMMENT


### • EPAwill accept written commentfor 30 days afterthis proposal is published in the Federal Register, and the agencywill hold a public hearing ifrequested. • To request a hearing, contactJoan Rogers at (919) 541·4487, orby 

### email at rogecs.!oanc@e!!j!.gpv. Hearing requests must be

### made within five days afterthis proposal is published In the Federal Register. o Ifa hearing is requested, it

### will be

### held In Research Triangle Park, N.C. To learn whether EPA Is holding a public hearing and for details, check EPA's website at: http://www.epa.goy/airguality/ollandgas. • There are multiple ways to submitwritten comments on the proposal. To ensure EPA receives your comments, identifythem with this Docket 10 

### number: EPA·HQ..OAR-2010· 0505. Then submit them using any ofthefollowing methods:

4o Go to www.regulatlons.gov and follow the on-line instructions forsubmitting comments. o Send comments by emailto a-and-r-docket@epa.gov, Attent1on Docket ID No. EPA**HQ-OAR-201~505.** o Fax your commentsto: (202) 566-1741, Attent1on Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010- 0505. o Deliveryour comments In person to: EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitut1on Ave. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20460. Please include a total oftwo copies. Such deliveries are onlyaccepted duringthe Docket's normal hours of operat1on (8:30a.m. to 4:30p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holiday), and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. o Mall your comments to: EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460, Attent1on Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-Q505. Please include a total oftwo copies. o More guidelinesfor submitting comments are available In the proposed rule, which is posted at http:l/www.epa.gov/airguality/oilandgas/actions.html

BACKGROUND

• On April17, 2012, EPA Issued cost-effective regulations, required by the Clean Air Act, to reduce harmfulair pollution from the oil and natural gas industry, while allowing continued, responsible growth in U.S. oil and natural gas production.The final rules included the first federal air standards for natural gas wells that are hydraulically fractured, along with requirements forseveral ofothersources of pollution in the oil and gas industrythat were not previously regulated atthe federal level.

• After EPA issued the final rule, the Agency received pet1t1ons for reconsiderat1on from several industry and environmental organizations, and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. EPA is cont1nuing to evaluate other Issues raised in those petit1ons.

o Industry groups that petlt1oned for reconsideration are: the American Natural Gas Association; the American Petroleum Association; Gas Processors Associat1on; the Interstate Natural Gas Association ofAmerica; theTexas Oil and Gas Association; the Western Energy Alliance; REM Technology Inc.; and Uointly) the Independent Petroleum Assoclat1on ofAmerica, Independent Oil and Gas Association ofWest Virginia, Inc., Kentucky Oil & Gas Association, Inc., Indiana Oil and Gas Association, Pennsylvania Independent Oil & Gas Association, Ohio 5Oil and Gas Association, and the Illinois Oil & Gas Association.

o Environmental groups that petitioned for reconsideration are: Earth]ustice; and Uolntly) Clean Air Council, the Clean AirTask Force, Environmental Defense Fund, Group Against Smog and Pollution, the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Sierra Club.

6

### {



# ( STATEOFNEWMEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD lN THE l\tA1'TER OFPROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO AIR QUALITY REGULATfONS 20.2.77 AND 20.2.82 NMAC No. EIB 13..07(R)


### NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT'S NOTICE OF INTENT TO

### PRESENT TECHNICAL TESTIMONY Pursuant to 20.1.1.302.A NMAC, the New Mexico EnvironmentDepartment ("NMID"


### or"Department"') herebysubmits its Notice ofIntent to present technical testimony in this proceeding.


### 1. Person Represented Bv the Technical Witnesses. 

### The NewMexico EnvironmentDepartment, Envicorunental J'rotectionDivision,

### Air Quality Bureuu.


### 2. Nnme 

### and Qunllfrcntions 

### or Ench Technical Witness. 

### Lany Weaver, Ms. Weaver is an Environmental Analyst in

### the Conu1ll Slmtcgies Unit of the Plnnning SL-ction ofthe Department's Air Quality Bureau. She is responsible for prcp.1ring, stale 

### implementation plans, policies, and regulations for airquality. She has also sc1ved as the Bureau's Health ProJ,>ram 

### Manager, with oversight over the Small Business Assistance Progrnm. 

### Prior to**~oming** 

### to the Department, Ms. Wea\'er served as an Air Resources 

### Engineerwith the California 

### Air Resl)ll[CL>S Board. Rita Bates. Rita Bates is 

### the Section C11icfofthe Planning Section ofthe Air Quality Bureau. She bas more !bun 20 years ofexperienceinthe environmental field, including fourteen years with the 

### Department. In

### addition to herworkfor the Air Quality Bureau, Ms. Bateshas

NO. ElB IJ..07(R)-NMED'sN011CEOFiNTENT-PAGE 1

### worked in industry as an environmenllll coordinator and inenviromnentnl consulting as aproject manager. Ms. Batesholds a B.S. in

### Biology from Humboldt State University. Herresume is attached as Exhibit 2. 3. A Copy ofthe Directlcslimony ofEatbWitness in NarrnCivc Form. 

### Acopy ofthe 

### direct testimony ofMs. Weaver

### is attached 

### as Exhibit NMED 

### 3. Ms. Weaver will

### provide abriefsummary ofher testimony during thehearing. TI1o 

### Department does not intend to 

### present direct testimony by Rita Bates, but may presentber

### as arebuttal witness, and will makeher available to assist in answering questions that may !:.'0 

### beyond U1c 

### expertiseof tbe diret:t

### witnesses. 4. Text 

### ofRecommended 1\fodlflcations to the Proposed RegulatoryChange 

### The Departmentrecommends thnt the Board udopt theproposed**re~:.>ulatory** 

### changes to 20.2.77 and 20.2.82 NMAC as contained in E111ribit 4 & 

### 5, respectively. Exhibit4 contains a change in the proposed date ofincorporation ofthe federal siandards inlo 20.2.77 NMAC, as 

### C()mpared to 

### the request 

### in theDL'!Xlrtmt,lL's petition. Specifically, the Departmentrequests

### that that dale be

### SLjllcmber23, 

### 2013,**ratht:~·than** 

### August29, 2013. Exhibit 

### 5contains proposed cha.nge.9 

### to 20.2.82 NMAC thut are identical to 

### those proposed in

### the DeJ>artmenl's petition.
5. List andDescription ofExblhlts The

### Department submits the following exhibits: NMEDI NMED2 NMEDJ 

### NMED4 Reswne

### ofLanyWeaver Resume ofRita

### Bates WrittenTestimonyofLanyWeaver 

### Proposed Revised

### Amendments to 20.2.77NMAC

NO. EfB U-/Jl(H)-NMED's NOTICE OF INTENT-PAGE2

# ( NMEDS Nl'vfED 6 NMED7 NMED8 NMED9a NMED9b NMED 10 

### NMED II 

### NMED 12 NMEDI3 NMED 14 

### NMED 15 NMED 16 

### Proposed Amendments to 20.2.82 NMAC List ofRecent FR Notices under Part 77 (40 CFR 60) and Part 82 (40 CPR 63) 1985 

### Delegation ofAuthority Letter (NSPS nnd NESHAP) 1995 Delegation ofAuthority Letter (MAGI) Public Notice (New Mexico Register) Public Notice (AlbUQ\1erque Journal, Spanish/English) July I, 2013 NMED Letter to Stakeholders September23, 2013 Email to Stakeholders August 30, 2013 EPA Memo on !nadvc11cnt Errors Excerpts from Clean Air Act§§ Ill & 

### 112 Propose<l Statement ofReasons t(>r Auoption ofRules Federal Register Notices (on CD only) Lcllcr to Small Business Regulatory Advisory Commission

6. Rcsc•·ntion ofRigltts 

### This Notice ofTntent to Present Technical Testimony is based onthe Department's petition. The Department reserves the right to call any person to testify and to**pres~'lll** 

### any exhibit in

### response to another notice ofintent orpuhlic comment filed in 

### this matter or to any testimonyor exhibit oilercd at the public heu1ing. The Department also reserves the right to call any person as a rebuttal witness and to present any exhibit in support thereof.

NO. EJB 13-07(R)- NMJ:.D 's N011CE OFINTENT- PAGE3

### Respectfully submitted, NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT

Bill Grantham Assistant General Counsel New Mexico EnvironmentDepartment 1190 SL Fr,lllcis Olive, Suite N-4068 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505 505.222.9594 bill.granthum@state.nm.us

NO. EIB 13-0l(R)-NMED'sNOTICEOFJNTENT-PAG£4

### (



# ( LANYWEAVER

EDUCATION

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIAATDAVIS 

### B.S., Mt(htmkalEngineering, 1981.

ExPERIENCE

STATE OFN!!WM!!x:ICO, ENviRONMENTDI!PARTMI!NT AIRQUALITY BUREAU 

### Enuimnmenlai.AJta&It, Planning St(/ion, Mf!Y2001-

### prmnl Health Pmgr(JIIIManagtr; ContmlStrallgitiStdion, M'!J 199 !J
- 

### M'!J2001 

### Enuimnmmta/EnginmilrgSptdali.rt, April 1990-

### M'!Y 1993 The Control Strategy Section (now the ControlStrategies Unit ofthe Planning Section) of the 

### Air Quality Bureau is responsible for preparing state implementation plans, policies, and regulations for airquality. During the time that I was Health Program Manager, the section also included the Small Business Assistance Program. In addition to**~eloping** and providing testimony regarding numerous air quality plans andregulations, I have developed a digital air quality regulatory archive tool to increase the accessibility ofhistorical hearing records for staffand the public.

CAI..IFORNL-\ AIRRI!SOURCI!S BOARD Sacramento, California 

### Air&m1111%IEngineer, C4RB Stationary S01111%IDiviiion,April 1981 - 

### Marr:h 1984 The staffofthe California

### Air Resources Board develops statewide air quality regulations and plans, as well as model regulations for consideration by local

### Air QualityManagement Districts, under the direction ofthe Board. To this end, CARB staffdevelops supporting documents and reports, conducts outreach, hosts workshops, and provides technical testimony at Board hearings when the regulations and plans are considered. As a staff memberin the Stationary Sources Division, I participated in the development ofseveral reports and regulations, includingrevisions to the limitations for lead ingasoline and sulfur in diesel fuel 

## Exh. NMED 1

# ( RITABATES

EDUCATION
HUMBOlDTSTATE UNIVERSITY, ARCATA, CALIFORNIA 

### B.S., 

### Biology, 1990. Mi110ri11 

### Bolally, qwpha.ri.t i11

### Eevlogy. Allmdtwt da/$$ 

### 1986-1990. ExPERIENCE
STATE OFNEWMExiCO, ENviRONMENTDEPARTMENT AIR QuALITY BUREAU, PLANNING & PoucvSECTioN 

### Staio" Chi¢Mtnrh 

### 200i-pmmt PFtlgtrJ111

### Malia§" 

### (NamlSae-1Matla§"-2), Matrb 2000-Mtnrh 200i Bllmo1f11111dai

### Sptaalm,**DeN~~btr** 

### 1998-

### Mmrh 2000 B11fliro1t111mtal

### Saeflli.rt,AJI/f!IJI 1998-**Dem~~btr** 

### 1998 ThePlanning & Policy section ofthe

### AirQuality Bureauis responsible for the control strategy, dispersion modeling, emission inventory and small business IISsistance progums in the 

### AirQuality Buteau. The control strategy section ofthe 

### AirQuality Buteau is responsible for preparing state implementation plans, policies, andregulations for 

### air quality. The modeling section ensures that all 

### air dispersion modeling analyses submitted to out agency are accurate and complete. The SmallBusinessAssistance Program assists small businesses in meeting

### air quality

### regulatory requirements.
EMPIRE GROUP, 

### U.C Empire, Nevada

Empire Group, 

### U.C is theparent company for several entities

### wbich own andoperate a geothermalpowerplant, an onion and

### garlic dehydration plant, severalranches, and a 

### garlic seed operation. In myposition as environmental coordinator,I was responsible for permittingatall facilities. JBRENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. Reno, Nevada**Bll~.troMttl'ltal**

### A.Jta!yn IV, 

### Rewo OJ!ia Coordilfator/ MalflllP, ]11!J 1994-]11!11996 E1111iTOK11UKtaiAJra!ytt

## lll,J•& 199)-]11!11994 EwflirolfllttKta!AIItl}ystI, Jut 1990-]11!1199) As the manager ofthe Reno office, I supervised seventechnical staffand one administrative employee. 

### During my employmentwithJBR, I worlted on andmanaged numerous NEPA, environmentalpermitting and baseline projects. 

## Exh. NMED 2

# ( IN THE MATTEROFPROPOSED AMENDMENTS TOAIRQUALITY REGULATIONS 

### 20.2.77 AND 20.2.82 NMAC

Proposed 

### Revisions bbibltNMED 3 WrittenTestimony ofLanyWeaver EnvirollmentalAnalyst 

### New Mexico Envb'onment Department Air

### QnalltyBureau 

### No. Em 13-07 (R)



### 1 The Air

### Quality Bureau p!oposes

### amendments to 

### the Air

### Quality Regulations at 20.2.77 2 NMAC- New Source Performance Standards ("NSPS'j and 

### 20.2.82 NMAC -Maximum 3 

### Achievable Control Technology Standards for Source Categories of HazardousAir 4 

### Pollutants ("MACTj. Copies ofthe

### proposed amendments, including arevised 5 amendment, are included as 

### Exhibits NMED 4 

### and 5. 6 7 

### Adoption of performance and 

### emissions standards isauthorized by the 

### Air Quality 8 Control Act (AQCA), whichprovides at 

### 1978 NMSA § 

### 74-2-S.C: 9 

### 10 Regulations adoptedbythe environmental improvement

### board orthe local board 11 may: 12 (2) prescribe standards of performance for sources and

### emission stsndards for 13 hazardous air

### pollutants that, 

### exceptas 

### provided in this subsection: 14 (a) shall be no more stringent

### than but at

### least as stringentas required by federal 15 stsndards ofperformance; and 16 (b) 

### shall be applicable only to 

### sources subjectto 

### such federal standards of 17 performance; 18 19 Incorporationby reference ofthe federal standards is thebestway to

### ensure 

### that New 20 Mexico's stsndards comply with allprovisions of§ 74-2-S.C. The proposed amendments 21 to

### Parts 77 and 

### 82 include NSPS rules published in the

### Federal Register from January 1, 22 2011 to 

### September23, 2013, and MACfrules poblished in the

### Federal Register from 23 January 1, 2011 to 

### August 29, 2013. AlistofrelevantFederal Registernotices is 24 included as ExhibitNMED 6. 25 26 EffectofIncorporation 

### 27 28 Underthe 

### federal Clean Air

### Act ("CAA"), authority to

### implementand enforce theNSPS 29 and 

### MACfstandards maybe

### delegated to 

### states. The EPA, however, retains the 

### 30 authorityto enforce the standards directly. SeeCAA § 

### lll(c) and§ 112(1)(7). New 31 Mexico bas 

### sought and 

### obtained implementation authority. The EPAinitially delegated 32 authority to 

### New Mexico for the

### NSPS program on March 15, 1985 in aletter to 

### the 

# Exh. NMED 3

### I governor (ExhibitNMED 7). 

### New Mexico was 

### granted authority toimplement and 2 enforce the

### Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) 

### Standards for Source 3 Categoriesof

### Hazardous 

### Air Pollutants 

### by

### the EPAonJuly27, 

### 1995 (ExhibitNMED 

### 8). 4 TheDepartmentperiodicallyrequests thatthe Board

### update thedateofincorporation in 

### 5 the NewMexicoAdministrative Codeinorderto 

### includenew rules and 

### amendments 

### 6 made to the federal regulations. 

### 7 

### 8 Implementationofthe standardsbytheDepartment is more efficient and 

### effective

### than 9 reliance on federal implementation. Department personnel routinelyinspect affected 

### 1

0 sources

### todeterminecompliance, and 

### Departmentpermit

### writers developpennit 

### 11 conditions for new andmodified sources. Therefore, theDepartment 

### is well positioned 12 to determine which standards are applicableto 

### sources and

### todetermine source 13 compliance. While EPA retains oversightauthoritythrough theRegion 

### 6offices in 14 Dallas, EPA 

### does nothavethe staffand resources 

### to performday-to-dayimplementation. 15 Generally, boththeEPA andtheregulated conununitypreferthat the Department 16 implement and enforcethe air 

### quality regulations. 17 18 

### PubllcOutreach 19 20 Thepublic notices for this proposal andhearing werepublishedintheNew Mexico 21 Register (ExhibitNMED 9a) and in the AlbuquerqueJournal inboth English and Spanish 22 (Exhibit 

### NMED 9b). NMED conductedadditional outreac:h directlyto

### potential 23 stakeholders1• On 

### July 1, 2013 wesent a letter (Exhibit

### NMED 1 0) informing

### them of 24 this proposal, and onSeptember 23,2013 wesent a follow-up email (Exhibit

### NMED 11) 25 informing

### them ofNMED'splan to amend our proposal for Part 77. Atthetime of

### this 26 filing, NMEDhas received no substantivecomments regarding the proposal. 27 28 

### ProposedChanges 

### to 

### Part77 29 30 TheEIB first adopted New SourcePerformance Standards (NSPS)byreferencein 1984. 31 These federal standards 

### are contained withinTitle 40 oftheCodeofFederal Regulations 32 Part60 (40 CFR Part 60). 

### In the Department's hearingrequest, weproposed that20.2.77 33 NMACbeamended 

### to incorporatebyreference the federal requirements pertainingto 34 NSPS promulgated bytheEPAfrom January I,20ll to August 29,2013. There were 35 twenty four (24)NSPS changes duringthis timeperiod forproposed incorporation. 36 37 

### The amendment ofoneadditional NSPS, referred to as Subpart 

### 0000or "quad

### 0",was 38 finalized and released to 

### the publiconAugust 2, 2013,butnotpublished in

### the Federal 39 Registeruntil September23, 

### 2013. Duringthat delay, EPA corrected inadvertent 

### errors 40 in the final 

### rulebutmade no substantive changes (ExhibitNMED 12). Becausethis rule 41 is of particularinterest

### to the oil and gas industry

### and was available almost a month 42 beforethe beginning 

### ofthepublic comment period for this hearing began, the 43 Department is requesting thatthedate "August 29, 20

### 13"in theproposed rulebe 44 amended to "September 23, 2013" (See ExhibitNMED 4). Doing so would result inonly

1The slllkeholder list includes industryorganizations, consultmts, public interestgroups, and all companies with airqualilypermits. ExhibitNMED 3- Testimony of Lany 

### Weaver- page 2

### (



## ( I one additional item, the amendments 

### to NSPS Subpart 0000,

### to the list

### ofthose 2 incorporatedbyreference in Part 77. 

### On September 23, 2013, the

### Department informed 3 stakeholders ofthis amendment 

### to the Department's proposal. See Exhibit NMED 11. 

### 4 5 Proposed Changesto Part82 6 

### 7 TheEm first adopted MaximumAchievable Control Technology Standards for Source 8 Categories ofHazardous 

### AirPollutantsby reference in 1994. These federnl standards are 9 contained within

### Title 40 ofthe Code ofFedernl Regulations Part 63 (40 CFR

### Part 63). 10 The Department is proposing that 

### 20.2.82 NMAC be

### amended 

### to incorporateby 11 reference the federal requirementspertaining

### to MACT standards

### promulgatedbythe 12 EPA from January 1, 2011 

### to August 29,2013. There were thirty

### (30) 

### MACT changes 13 during this 

### time period 

### forproposed incorporation. Nine (9} ofthe changes involved 14 changes 

### to an NSPS 

### as well 

### as a

### MACT rule. 15 16 Federal RegisterNotiees forRevisions to 

### 40 CFRParts 60 and

### 63 17 The Federal RegisterNotices are formal announcements ofnew orrevised regulations, 18 includingNew Source Performance Standards and Maximum Achievable Control 19 Technology Standards for Source Categories ofHazardous AirPollutants. As 

### previously 20 noted, Exhibit NMED 6 is a list ofthe notices announcing the amendments being 21 incorporated inthis 

### proposal, including the 

### date ofpublication. thePart(s) ofCFRTitle 22 40 (eitherPart 60, Part 63 orboth) amended, 

### and the title ofthe notice. NSPS Subpart 23 

### 0000,published onSeptember23, 2013, ishighlighted, 

### as itwould notbe

### included if 24 the Board adopts Part

### 77 as originallyproposed. Ifprinted, these notices would total 25 1660 pages. As a result, the full text Federal RegisterNotices are included ontheCD 26 only 

### as ExhibitNMED 15. The file name for eachrule corresponds to the tile name 27 listed in Exhibit

### NMED 6. 

### 28 29 Effect on SmaU Business 

### 30 31 Pursuanttothe Small Business Regulatory ReliefAct, 1978 NMSA § 14-4A·l, 

### etseq., 32 the Bureau has 

### determined that the regulatory changes proposed in this action will 

### not 33 have an adverse 

### effecton small business. This determination is based on the 

### fact that

### the 34 proposed amendment will

### not impose additional substantiverequirements on facilities, 35 but will 

### simply retain

### implementation authoritywiththe StateofNewMexico ratherthan 36 the U.S. EPA. Additionally, theNew Mexico Environment Department-Small Business 37 Environmental Assistance Program provides ongoing technical 

### assistance for small 3

### 8 businesses regarding new 

### and existing environmental regulatory requiremc:nts. 39 40

ExhibitNMED j. 

### Testimony of Lany Weaver- 

### page 3

### (



# ( I 2 3 4 

## s 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 IS 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2S 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 

### 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 

## so 51 52 S3 54 55 T1TLE20 CBAPTER2 PART77 ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION AIR QUALITY (STATEWIDE) NEW SOURCEPERFORMANCE STANDARDS 20.2.77.1 lSSUJNGAGENCY: NewMCllico &vironmentalImpro-tBoard. [06116195; 20.2.77.1 NMAC ·ltD,20NMAC2.77.10006123/00] 20.2..77.l SCOPE: Any 81ati0lllll'y IOutce.:onsuucting or modif:ying ll!ld which is subjeeltothe requjrcmcnw of40 CFRPart 60, as amended lhroup [);leeemherll,2919] Smrmplw23. 2013. [06116195, 11-19-97, 9-8.99; 20.2.77.2 NMAC •Rn20NMAC 2.77.101 & A,06123/00; A, 02/18/02; A, 06/13/03; A, 06/IS/07; A, 08/17/09; A, 09/02111; A, xx/xxlxx] 20.2.77:J ST A

TIJTORY AUI'IIORITY: The cavironmcntal impro\'CtiiOllt board "sltall promulgate regulations aadstandards ill.

..air qualitymanagem1111f' (NMSA 1978, Sec!i01174-1·8.A) aad "replationsadopted bythc t111vironmental impro\'CtiiOlltboard
...sball
... tiiiSIII'C thatrcgula!ioll!l aad standardallllder
...the federal aetwill notbeviolated." (NMSA 1978, See!i01174·2·7.B). {06/16195; 20.2.77.3 NMAC -Ito,20NMAC 2.77.102 06123100] 20.2..77.4 DURATION: Pcrmammt. [06116195; 20.2.77.4 NMAC ·ltD,20 NMAC 2.77.103 06123/00] 20.2..77.5 EFFECTIVE DATE: JIIIIC 16, 1995, except when: alaterdate iscited at thc endofa section or paragraph. [06/16/95, 08102196; 20.2.77.5 NMAC ·ltD,20NMAC 2.77.104 6123/00] [The latcetcffccti"" dale ofuyaection in Ibis partis xx-xx-xx] 20.2.77.6 OBJECTIVE: The objeetiVl: ofPart 77 ofChapter 2 is to adopt or establish state authority to implementnew source pcrfODIWICe standards for stationary soun:c:s inNew Mexico subject to 40 CFRPart 60. (06116/95; 20.2.77.6 NMAC -Ito, 20 NMAC 2.77.105 06123/00] '1.U.77.7 · DEFINmONS: {RESERVED] [20.2.77.7 NMAC •N, 06123/00} 20.1.77.8 AMENDMENT AND SUPERSESSION OFPRIORREGULATIONS: This part amends ll!ld supcrscdcs AirQuality Control Regulation (AQCR) 750,last61cd on APril tO, 1994. All references toAQCR 750 inanyotherrule sltallbeundcmood u a rd:tence tothis part. [06116195; 20.2.77.8 NMAC -Ito,20 NMAC 2.77.106 06123100] 20.2..77.9 ADOPTION OF40CFRPART60: Ell.ceptas otherwise provided, the new 

### sou.rec perfollllllllce llllmdards as prolllUigatedbythe UnitedStates cnvimnmt:ntal protection agency, 40 CfRPart 60, as amended in the Federal Register lhrough[Qeeomher 31,2919) Sopt.mher23. 2013 are hen:by incotporatcd into Ibis part (20.2.77 NMAC]. [06/16195, 08/02196, 11119197, 09108/99; 20.2.77.9 NMAC •Rn 20 NMAC 2.77.107 &A, 06102/00; A, 02/18/02; A, 06/13/03; A. 06/1"07; A. 08/17/09; A, 09102111, A, xx/xxlxx) 20.2.77.10 MODIFICATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS: The following UIOdifications or exceptions are lllade to the incorporated federalatandards. A. Amend 40CfRPart 60, Section 60.2, Definitions, as follows: Forthcpurposes ofdelcsatiooof authority which the adlllinistrator ofthe United Star.os environlllCDWprotectionagency may, inbis discretio!l, deleg-.. to the sccrctaryofthoNewMexico cmvironmentdepattmmt, "adlllinislrator"means the secretaryofthe department orhisauthoriud**reprcse~~tative.** B. &elude40 CfR·Part60, SubpartAAA- Standards ofPerformance forNew Residential Wood Heaters. C. Thefcdcralllllmdards ofperformance incorporatedbyIbis rcgula!iOII sball notbe subjectto NMSA 1978, Scc!i01174-2-8 (VIIrilmces).

20.2.77 NMAC 

# Exh. NMED 41 D. Exclude 40 CFRPart 60, SubpartHHHH, Emission Guidelines and Compliance Times for Cnal2 FiredElectric Steam Generatina Units. 3 [06116/9S; 20.2.77.10 NMAC -Rn, 20 NMAC 2.77.108 06123/00; A, 06/JS/07) 4 S 20.2.77.11 DOCUMENTS: DocumeniS incorporated and cited inthis Partmay be viewed at the New 6 Mexico environment department, airquality bureau, 1301 SilerRoad, BuildingB, SantaFeNM, 87S07. 7 [06/16/9S; 20.2.77.11 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.77.109 06123100; A, 08/17/09) 8 9 HISTORY OF 10.2.77NMAC: 10 Pre-NMAC Ulltnry: The material inthis part was derived from thatp>:eviously filed with the Commission of II Public Records-State Records Center and An:hives. 12 EIB/AQCR 7SO, AirQuality Control Regulation 7SO- New Source PerforDlBIICe Standanls, 07/24/84. 13 EIB/AQCR 7SO, Air Quality Cnntrol Regulation 7SO ·New Source Perfonnance Standanls, 08118/87. 14 EIB/AQCR 7SO, Air Quality Control Regulation 7SO ·New Source Perfu1D18Dce Standanls, 07/07/88. IS EIB/AQCR 7SO, Air Quality Control Regulation 7SO ·NewSource Perfonnance Standards, 04/27/89. 16 EIB/AQCR 7SO, Air Quality Control Regulation 7SO- New Source Perfonnance Standanls, OS/29190. 17 EIB/AQCR 7SO, AirQuality Control Regulation 7SO- New Source Perfonnance Standards, 04/22/91. 18 EIB/AQCR 7SO, Air Quality Control Regulation 7SO- New SourcePerfonnance Standards, 04/14192. 19 EIB/AQCR 7SO, Air Qoality Cnntrol Regulation 7SO- New Source PerforDlBIICe Standards, 04/21/93. 20 EJB/AQCR 7SO, Air Quality Cnntrol Regulation 7SO- New Source Perfonnance Standards, 04/12194. 21 22 HistoryofRepealed Material: [RESERVED] 23 24 OtherHistory: 2S Em/AQCR 7SO, Air Quality Cnntrol Regulation 7SO- New SourcePerfonnance Standards, filed 04/12/94 was 26 reDDmbered into first venionoftheNew Mexico Administrative Cnde as 20 NMAC 2.77, New Source 27 Performance Standards, filed OS/1719S. 28 20 NMAC 2.77, New Source Perfonnance Standards, filed OS/11/9S, was renumbered,reformatted, amended 29 and replaced by 20.2.77 NMAC, New Source Perfunnance Standards, effective 06/23100. 30



### \.

20.2.77 NMAC 2

## ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1Z 

### 13 

### 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 

### 22 23 24 

# ( l5 l6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 

### 45 46 47 48 49 

# so 51 

## ( 2 .>3 54 55 TITLE20 CHAPTER% PARTS% ENVIRONMENTAL I'ROTECTION AIRQUALITY(STATEWIDE)**~AOWEVABLECONTROLTECBNOLOGYSTANDARDSFORSOURCE** CATEGORIES OFHAZARDOUSAIRPOLLUTANTS %0.1.82.1 ISSUINGAGENCY: New Mexico EnviromnentallmprowmentBoaro. [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.1,08114/98; 20.2.82.1 NMAC ·R.n., 20 NMAC 2.82.100 06123/00] 20.1.8%.% SCOPE: Ali110111"CeS emittinghazardous airpoUutants, which are subjec:t to the requirements of 40 CFRPart 63,15 ameoded throush [&;lmmllw Jl, a919]August29, 2013. [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.2, 08114198; A,08114198, 09108199; 20.2.82.2 NMAC • Rn20 NMAC 2.82.101 & A, 06123100; A, 02/18102; A, 06/13/03; A, 06108107; A, 08117109; A, 09102111] 20.2.8%.3 STATUTORYAUTHORITY: EnviromnentallmprovementAct,NMSA 1978, Section74-1-8 (A) (4) and (7), andAltQualityComro1 Act, NMSA 1978, Sec:tiooa 74-2-1 et seq.,

### illcJudins epedticaUy, Sec:tion 74-2-S (A), (B) and (C). Section74-2-S (C)provides tbat "reguuations adopted bythe enviromnental improYement boW!Il&Y prescribe llalldarda ofpcri'ormance mr liOIII:ceS and emiasio!llllalldarda lbrhazardous airpollulaats.•." [Rn, 20NMAC 2.82.3,08/14198; A, 08/14198; 20.2.82.3 NMAC • Rn, 20NMAC 2.82.102 06123100] %0.%.82.4 DURATION: Permanent [Rn, 20NMAC 2.82.4, 08114/98; 20.2.82.4 NMAC ·R.n., 20 NMAC 2.82.103 06123/00] %0.2.82.5 EFFECTIVEDATE: November27, 1994, exceptwhere a laterdale is cited attbund ofa section orparagraph. [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.S,08/14198; A, 08114198; 20.2.82.S NMAC • Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.104 06123100] (The latesteffective dare ofany section in this partisSeprcmber2,2011

### J %0.2.8%.6 OBJECTIVE: Theobjeeti'l'e oftbls partisto adoptorestablish state authority to implement emiasion standardafor bazatdou.s airpoUutants for the**~** categories in NewMexico subject tofederal standards. The US EPA requiresNewMexico to adopt suchatandarda inolderto implementrequirements in Section 112 ofthe CleanAltAct [Rn, 20NMAC 2.82.6, 08114198; A,08114198; 20.2.82.6NMAC • Rn, 20NMAC 2.82.10S 06123100] 20.2.82.7 DEPINITIONS:**~)** [20.2.82.7NMAC •R.n., 20 NMAC 2.82.107 06123100] 20.2.8%.8 ADOPTION OF40CJ.l'RPART 63: Exceptu otherwiseprovidedin aection20.2.82.10 NMAC {below),thenational emission standards forhazardous airpollutants lbr soun;ecategories as promulptedby the US EPA, 40 CFR Part 63, as •!M!!I!ed inthe Federal Registerthrough [l;)ooo1Bl!erll 12019] AugwJ! 29, 2013 are hereby inc:orponoted into tbls part(20.2.82 NMAC). [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.7, 08114198; A, 08/14198, 09108199; 20.2.82.8 NMAC •Rn 20 NMAC 2.82.106 & A, 061'23100; A, 02/18102; A, 06/13103; A. 06108/07; A. 08117109; A. 09/02/11] 20.2.82.9 SOURCES SUBJECTTO40 CJ.l'R 63.40• 63.44 OFSVBPART B (COIUiructetl and ReconstructedMajorSoar- ofHazardo1111 A1r PollatiUlts): Theowoeroroperatorofa source subject to these provisions, lhst

### win be constructing or**n:eot~~~!nlcting** after 1wle29, 1999, ohall notconstn1ctorreeonstruc:tliDless: A. !besoun:chasreceived a maximum achievable control technology(MACT) determination 1111d approval from the depotlment underthis part; and B. theMACT determination and approval has been incolporatedinto a permit under20.2.72 NMAC

- ConstructionPenniIs or20.2.70 NMAC • ()pclatingPermits. [08/14198; 20.2.82.9 NMAC • Rn, 20NMAC 2.82.108 06123100] %0.2.82.10 MODIFICATIONSAND EXCEPTIONS: Thefollowing modificatioDS orexceptions are made to the illcorporatedtioderalotandarda: A. gll!ICI11l provisicms: Amend 40 CFR.Part63, SubpartA·GeneralProvisions, Section 63.2, 20.2.82 NMAC 

## Exh. NMED 51 DefinitioDS, as follows: Forthe purposes ofdelegation ofauthority which the .AdminislratoroftheUS EPA may, in 2 hisorherdiscretion,**do~A!pto** lo !he leCI'el.lllyof!heNewMe><ico environmentdcpanmem. "adminislrator" means 3 !he se<:rctaryor bislber**authorized~.** 4 B. variances: The federal emission standards incalporalcdbyIbis Part shall oot be subjecttoNMSA S 1978, Section74-2-8 (Variances). 6 C. conslluclcd and n!COIISirUCied majorsour=: The effectivedate for incorporationof40 CFR 7 63.40

- 63.44 ofSubpartBUlldt:r20.2.82.8 NMAC sball be June29, 1999. 

### 8 [Rn. 20NMAC 2.82.8, 08/14198; A, 08114/98; 20.2.82.10 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.109 06123/00] 9 10 20.2.8:2.11 DOCUMENTS: 

### Documents incotporated IIIII cilcd inIbis partmay be viewed at the New 11 Me><ico environment department, air quality bureau, 1301 SiletRoad, Building B, SantaFe NM, 87507. 12 (08114/98; 20.2.82.11 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.110 06123/00; A, 08/17109] 

### 13 14 WSTORYOF20-2.82 NMAC: 15 Pre-NMAC History: None. 

### 16 17 BllloryofRepealed Material: [RESERVED] 18 19 OilierHistory: 20 20NMAC 2.82,Ma:JtimumAchievable Con!rol TechnologyStandards For Source Categories OfHazan:lousAir 21 Pollulants, effective 11127/94. 22 20 NMAC 2.82, Ma:JtimumAchievable Control Techllolo8Y Standards For Source Categories OfHazardous Air 23 Pollutants (filed 10128194) was reaumbered, nformatled,amended udreplaced by20.2.82 NMAC, Maximum 24 Achievable Control Teclmoloay StandardsFor Source Categories OfHazardous AirPollutants, effective 06123/00.

20.2.82 NMAC 2Lf'fAmendments to 40CFR 60 and 63 Published in the Federal Rer'from January 1, 2011 to August 29, 2013 andSeptember23, 2t
Date ofFederal PDF name Register 40CFR Part(s) Title I paps Standards ofPerformance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired, Electric Utility, IndustrialCommercial-Institutional, and Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam 2011-1008 1/20/2011 60 Generating Units 8 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry and Standards ofPerformance for Portland 2011-759 1/18/2011 60 and 63 Cement Plants 6 National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories: Gasoline Distribution BulkTerminals, Bulk Plants, and Pipeline Facilities; and 2011-906 1/24/2011 63 Gasoline Dispensing Facilities 31 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Gold Mine Ore Processing and Production Area SourceCategory; and Addition toSource Category 2011-2608 2/17/2011 63 Ust for Standards 41 2011-4310 2/25/2011 60 StandardsofPerformance for New Stationary Sources; Correction 1 National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal 2011-5196 3/9/2011 63 Combustion Engines 11 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Chemical 2011-5778 3/14/2011 63 Manufacturing Area Sources 2 StandardsofPerformance for New Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelines for 2011-4491 3/21/2011 60 Existing Sources: Sewage Sludge Incineration Units 84 National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area Sources: 2011-4493 3/21/2011 63 Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers S4 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for MajorSources: 2011-4494 3/21/2011 63 Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters 96 Standards ofPerformance for New Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelines for 2011-4495 3/21/2011 60 Existing Sources: Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units 88 Standards ofPerformance for New Stationary Sources and Emissions Guidelines for 2011-7899 4/4/2011 60 Existing Sources: Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators 9 

## Exh. NMED 6 1fAmendments to40 CFR 60 and 63 Published in the Federal Rel from January 1, 2011 to August 29, 2013 andSeptember23, 2L
Date of Federal PDF name Reclster 40CFR Part(s) r11:1e lpaaes National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions: Group I Polymers and Resins; MarineTank Vessel loading Operations; Pharmaceuticals 2011-8168 4/21/2011 63 Production; and the Printing and Publishing Industry 38 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry and Standards of Performance for Portland 2011-12095 S/17/2011 60 and 63 Cement Plants 9 Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters and 2011-12308 5/18/2011 60 and 63 Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units 3 Amendments to National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants forArea 2011-15274 6/20/2011 63 Sources: Plating and Polishing 10 Standards of Performance for Stationary Compression Ignition and Spark Ignition 2011-15004 6/28/2011 60 Internal Combustion Engines 26 2011-16462 6/29/2011 60 Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources; Correction 3 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From Petroleum 2011-17901 7/18/2011 63 Refineries· Partial Withdrawal of Final Rule 4 Amendments to National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants forArea 2011-23806 9/19/2011 63 Sources: Platinl! and Polishinl! 11 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions for Primary lead 2011-29287 11/15/2011 63 Processing 27 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions for Shipbuilding and Ship Repair (Surface Coating); National Emission Standards for Wood Furniture 2011-29457 11/21/2011 63 Manufacturing Operations 27 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Area Source Standards 2011-32835 12/23/2011 63 for Prepared Feeds Manufacturing; Amendments 6 National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From Secondary lead 2011-32933 1/5/2012 63 Smelting 37 Incorporation of Revised ASTM StandardsThat Provide Flexibility in the Use of 2012-712 1/18/2012 60 Alternatives to Mercury-Containing Industrial Thermometers 11L('Amendments to 40 CFR 60 and 63 Published in the Federal Re{'"""'from January 1, 2011 to August 29, 2013 andSeptember23, 2L
Date afFederal PDF name Rellister 40 CFR Part(s) Title , paps National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and Standards of Performance for Fossil-Fuel Fired Electric Utility, Industrial-commercial-Institutional, and Small Industrial2012-806 2/16/2012 60and 63 Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units 211 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Polyvinyl Chloride and 2012-6421 4/17/2012 63 Copglymers Production 102 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From Coal and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and Standards ofPerformance for Fossil-Fuel Fired Electric Utility, Industrial-commercial-Institutional, and Small Industrial2012-8703 4/19/2012 60and 63 Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units; Correction 11 Method 16C forthe Determination ofTotal Reduced Sulfur Emissions From 2012-18513 7/30/2012 60 Stationary Sources 7 2012-19691 8/14/2012 60 New Source Performance Standards Review for NitricAcid Plants 16 Oil and Natural Gas Sector: New Source Performance Standards and National 2012-16806 8/16/2012 60 and 63 Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants Reviews 112 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Pulp and Paper 2012-20501 9/11/2012 63 Industry 18 Standards of Performance for Petroleum Refineries; Standards of Performance for Petroleum Refineries forWhich Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification 2012-20866 9/12/2012 60 Commenced After Mav 14, 2007 60 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions: Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks; and Steel 2012-20642 9/19/2012 63 Pickling-Hd Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration Plants 35 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Chemical 2012-30698 12/21/2012 63 Manufacturing Area Sources 26 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines; New Source Performance Standards for Stationary Internal 2013-01288 1/30/2013 60and 63 Combustion Engines 52 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for MajorSources: 2012-31646 1/31/2013 63 Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters 77 3l f Amendments to 40 CFR 60 and 63 Published in the Federal Re1. from January 1, 2011 to August 29, 2013 andSeptember23, 2L
Date of Federal PDF name Resister 40 CFR Part(s) Title 11 pa&es National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants forArea Sources: 2012-31645 2/1/2013 63 Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Bailers 36 Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units: Reconsideration and 2012-31632 2/7/2013 60 Final Amendments; Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials That Are Solid Waste 103 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Portland Cement 2012-31633 2/12/2013 60 and 63 Manufacturing Industry and Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants 

## so National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal 2013-01288- Combustion Engines; New Source Performance Standards for Stationary Internal

correction 3/6/2013 60and 63 Combustion Engines; Correction 1 Final Rule; Reconsideration ofCertain New Source Issues: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and Standards of Performance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired Electric Utility, Industrial-Commercial-Institutional, and Small Industrial-Commercial2013-24073 4/24/2013 60 and 63 Institutional Steam Steam Generating Units 22 Federal Plan Requirements for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators Constructed On or Before December 1, 2008, and Standards of Performance for 2013-28052 5/13/2013 60 New Stationary Sources: Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators; Final Rule 28 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From Petroleum 2013-14624 6/20/2013 63 Refineries 16 Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Reconsideration ofCertain Provisions of New Source 2013-22010 9/23/2013 60 Performance Standards [Subpart 0000) 34 Total numberofpages: 1660

# .. ' 

# .- •. 

## (



# (

'---·- 

# . . J 

# F. A ' 

### f"il

### erl: 1\:..1.

### dl.L 

## r-Y.z / UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

### ?.}t1f";)

...GION Yl ;/(

# ..:.:::..~-::::.":::, 

# {!'I
- 05-I

# D) 1

# Jtj,~ March 15, 1985 Honorable**Ton~** 

### Anaya Governor of New Mexico Santa Fe, New Mexico 87503 Dear Governor Anaya: In response to your letter of October 19, 1984, I am pleased to grant your request for delegation of authority for Implementation and enforcement of New Source Performance Standards and National Emfssfon•Stanllards···· for Hazardous Afr Pollutants to the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Dfvfsfon. The pertinent laws of the State of New Mexico and the rules and regulations of the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Dfvfslon have been reviewed and have been found to provide an adequate and effective procedure for fmplementatfon and enforcement of the New Source Performance Standards and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Afr Pollutants by the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Dfvlsfon and the State of New Mexico. The resources and cap&bflftles of the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Division have been found to be adequate to Implement and enforce these programs. Therefore, I am delegating authority to the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Division to Implement and enforce New Source Performance Standards and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Afr Pollutants, promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through March 14, 1984, and December 9, 1983, respectively. This delegation of authority Is granted pursuant to Sections 111(c) and 112(d) of the Clean Air Act, and Is subject to the conditions and limitations stated fn the delegation. Except as specifically limited fn this letter, all of the authority and responsfbflltfes of the Administrator or the Regional Administrator whfch are found fn 40 CFR Part 60 and 40 CFR Part 61 as of the date of thfs letter are delegated to the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Division. 

### AnY of such authority and responslbllftfes may be redelegated by the Dfvlsfon tofts Director or staff. In addition, the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Division will maintain partial delegation of authority for the technical and administrative revfew of New Source Performance Standards promulgated or revised after March 14, 1984, and of National Emfssfon Standards for Hazardous Afr Pollutants promulgated or revised after December 9, 1983. Thfs partial delegation of authority fs also subject to the conditions and limitations stated fn the delegation.



## Exh. NMED 7

### 2 

### Since this delegation 1s effective Immediately, there 1s no requirement that the State notify the EPA of 1ts acceptance. Unless the EPA receives from the State of New Mexico a written notice of objection w1th1n ten days of**th~** 

### date of receipt of this letter, the State of New Mexico and the New Mexico Environmental Improvement D1v1s1on will be deemed to have accepted all of the terms of the delegation.

Enclosure cc: Denise Fort, Director New Hex1co Environmental Improvement Division P. 

## o. Box 968, Crown 8u11d1ng Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504-0968

## ( PROVISIONS

for


### FULL DELEGATION

for the


### NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR
HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS (NESHAP) AUTHORITY 

# ( and
NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (NSPS) AUTHORITY

to the


### STATE OF NEW MEXICO (40 CFR Parts 60 and 61)
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 15, 1985

### Introduction On October 19, 1984, the Governor of New Mexico requested that the 

# u.s. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) delegate full authority to New Mexico for the New Source Performance Standards (HSPS) program and for the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (HESHAP) program. The Governor based his request upon the adoption by the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board of Air Quality Control Regulation 750 (New 

### Source Performance Standards), and Air Quality Control Regulation 751 (Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants) on July 13, 1984. Under the New Mexico Air Quality Control Act, the City of Albuquerque and Bernalillo County have established a program for the local administration and enforcement of the Air Quality Control Act, In lieu of the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board. The authority delegated In this document excludes those sources located within the boundaries of Bernalillo County. Full Delegation EPA has reviewed the Governor's request, Air Quality Control Regulations 750 and 751, and all other available Information on the Hew 

### Mexico Environmental Improvement Division (NMEID), Including Its Implementation of the partial delegation of these programs. EPA finds that the NMEID has an adequate and effective procedure for lmpl ementlng and enforcing the NSPS and HESHAP programs In the State of New Mexico, except for Indian lands, as defined at 18 

# u.s.c. §1151. Therefore, EPA hereby delegates the following authority for the Implementation and enforcement of the NSPS and NESHAP to the State of New Mexico, subject to the conditions and limitations specified below: 1. Authority for all sources located In the State of Hew 

### Mexico, outside Indian lands, subject to the NSPS promulgated In 40 CFR Part 60 through March 14, 1984. 2. Authority for all sources located In the State of New Mexico, outside Indian lands, subject to the NESHAP promulgated In 40 CFR Part 61 through December 9, 1983. Conditions and Limitations 1. Implementation and enforcement of NSPS and HESHAP In the State of New Mexico, outside Indian lands, will be the primary responsibility of the NMEID. If the State of New Mexico or the NMEID determines that such Implementation or enforcement Is not possible or feasible, either with respect to an Individual source, a**clas~** 

### of sources, or generally, the NMEID shall, within 30 days, notify EPA Region 6 of such Impossibility or Infeasibility so that EPA may timely exercise Its concurrent authority with respect to sources within the State of New Mexico. 2. Acceptance of this delegation constitutes agreement by the State of New Mexico and the NMEID to follow all Interpretations, past and future, made by EPA of 40 CFR Parts 60 and 61, Including determinations of appll-

## (



# (

I 

## l 2 

### cabl11ty. Prior EPA concurrence shall be obtained on any matter Involving the Interpretation of Sections 111 or 112 of the Clean Air Act or 40 CFR Parts 60 or 61 to the extent that application, Implementation, adminIstration, or enforcement of these sections have not been covered by prior EPA determinations or guidance. 3. The State of Hew 

### Mexico and the NMEID are not authorized to approve or disapprove any application, exemption, variance, or grant waiver of compliance with any provision of 40 CFR Part 61. The State of 

### New Mexico or the NMEID are, however, authorized to receive, review, evaluate, and recommend to EPA approval or disapproval of an application, exemption, variance or waiver, 4. The Federal NSPS regulations In 40 CFR Part 60, as amended, do not have provisions for granting waivers by class of testing requirements or variances, hence this delegation does not convey to the State of New Mexico or the NMEID authority to grant waivers by class of testing requirements or variances from NSPS regulations, 5. The State of New Mexico and the NMEID shall utilize the methods specified In applicable Appendices and Subparts of 40 CFR Parts 60 or 61 In determining compliance with the regulations, Including requiring tests at the times required by the regulations. Authority Is delegated to approve minor modifications to the reference test methods In 40 CFR Parts 60 and 61, during either a pre-test meeting or the actual sampling period. These minor modifications would have to produce results essentially Identical to the reference method results. Approval of these minor modifications should be based on sound engineering judgment. Under no circumstances are modifications to be used which might result In the non-uniform application of the standards, 6. If at any time there Is a conflict between any State regulation and any provision of 40 CFR Parts 60 or 61, the Federal regulation must be applied to the extent that It Is more stringent than that of the State. If the State of New Mexico or the NMEID does not have the authority to enforce the more stringent Federal regulation, the NMEID shall Immediately notify EPA Region 6 pursuant to Condition 1 above. This delegation may be revoked by EPA, In whole or In part, In the event any such conflict makes Implementation or enforcement of NSPS or NESHAP administratively Impractical. 1. 

### If a claim of confidentiality or any other reason should ever legally prevent the State of New Mexico and the NMEID from providing to EPA any or all Information required by or pertaining to the Implementation of NSPS and NESHAP, the NMEID shall, upon request, assist EPA Region 6 1n obtaining that Information directly from the source. At a mfnfmum, such assistance shall consist of 

### providing to EPA an Identification of the nature of the Information which the State cannot provide. In the absence of 

### such a legal reason, the State and the NMEID shall make available to any designated representative of EPA upon request all records, reports, or information provided to, or otherwise obtained by, the State In accordance wfth the provisions of 40 CFR Parts 60 or 61.3 

### B. All matters in process at the time of delegation of authority may 

### be processed through to completion by EPA Region 6, or may, at the request of the NMEID and at the discretion of EPA, be transferred to the NMEID for completion. Appropriate reproduction of pertinent file material in the EPA Region 6 files in relation to source regulation under NSPS and NESHAP shall be provided through mutual cooperation of the staffs of the respective offices. 9. Existing monthly reports normally submitted to EPA Region 6 for the Compliance Data System (CDS) shall be expanded to contain pertinent information relating to the status of sources subject to 40 CFR Parts 60 or 61. As a mininum, the following information must be provided to EPA: the name, address, type and size of each facility; date that operation at the facility commenced and dates of most recent compliance test; the compliance status of each facility with accompanying explanations of noncompliance where applicable; notice of enforcement actions brought against facilities because of violations of 40 CFR Parts 60 or 61; surveillance actions undertaken for each facility; and the results of all reports relating to emissions data, including excess emissions reports. 10. Emission data, as defined in 40 CFR 2.301(a)(2), shall be made available to the public. Emission data is to be correlated with applicable emission limitations or other measures in such a manner as to show the relationship between measured or estimated amounts of emissions and the amounts of such emissions which are allowable under the applicable emission limitations. If any information which is defined as emission data is found to be not available to the public by reason of State law or other legal requirement, the NMEID shall so notify EPA, Region 6, so that EPA may take the action necessary to release such data. 11. No 

### authority ls granted to the State or the NMEID to take any action which would require rulemaking by EPA. This limit on authority fncludes the grant of a waiver of testing requirements for any class of sources.

# (

( Partial Delegation The NMEID has requested tbat it have partial delegation for sources for which new regulations or revised regulations are promulgated, except for · sources in Indian lands, as defined at 18 

# u.s.c. §1151. 

### EPA hereby delegates the following partial authority for the implementation of the NSPS and NESHAP to the State of New Mexico subject to the following conditions and limitations: 1. Authority 

### for all sources located in the State of New Mexico, outside Indfan lands, subject to NSPS promulgated In 40 CFR Part 60 

### after March 14, 1984, 

### for which full delegation has not been granted above. 2. Authority for all sources located In the State of New Mexico, outside Indian lands, subject to NESHAP promulgated In 40 CFR Part 61 after December 9, 1983, for which full delegation has not been granted above. 3. Authority for all sources located In the State of New Mexico, outside Indian lands, subject to NSPS for which full delegation Is granted above, when part 

### or all of that NSPS has been revised after March 14, 

### 1984. 4. Authority 

### for all sources located In the State of New Mexico, outside Indian lands, subJect to NESHAP for which full delegation Is granted above, when part or all 

### of that NESHAP has been revised after December 9, 1983. Conditions and Limitations 1. The NHE!D shall conduct only the technical and administrative review Including determination 

### of applicability, review and evaluation 

### of NSPS and NESHAP applications, revfew and evaluation of requests for waivers of compliance under 40 

### CFR 61.11 

### and/or waivers of 

### emission tests under 40 

### CFR 61.13, 

### performance and evaluation of Inspections, and observance and evaluation of compliance tests and continuous emission monitoring tests. 2. All conditions and limitations specified above for full delegation apply also to this partial delegation.

### A**n~tlce** 

### of this delegation of authority will be published In the Federal**R~lster** 

### fn the near future. The notice will state, among other things, t at effective immediately, all reports required pursuant to the Federal NSPS and NESHAP by sources located in the State of New Mexico should be submitted-to the New Mexico Health and Environment Department, Environmental Improvement Division, P. 0. Box 968, Crown Building, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 87504-0968. Any such reports which may be received by EPA, Region 6, after the effective date of this delegation will be promptly transmitted to the NMEID.

Protection Agency

# c UNIT1iDSTATES ENVIRONIIEN'T,AL PIIOTECJION AGENCY REGIONS t445 ROSSAVENUE. SUITE t200 DALlAS, TX '75202-2733

Hr. 

### Mark Weidler secretary New Mexico EnvironlUillt DepartiDent P.O. BoX 26110 

### Santa Fe, NK 87502-6110 Dear Mr. 

### Jfeidlar: OUr 

### ottioa hall 

### o0111pletad raviav of your November 9, 1994, sUbmittal 

## tor delegation 

### ot authority under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (cnt) 

### Part 63 1 

### Subpart B to illpl-t and enforce the following regulatione: the New Mexico Air Quality control Requlation (AQCR) 780, 

### since renlllled u 20 

### New Mexico , Mminbtzative Code (NKAC) 2.82

- 

### !fnximum Acbit:yable Cpntrpl hqbno1oqy Standar4e fpr Sppmg CJtaq'orig of Hazardpu• Air 

### Ppllut;ont•l and the 

### New Mexico AQCR 755, 

### since renamed 20 

### NMAC 2.83 - Cpnltrgpt1pn gr Mpditicatipn 9( Major sourgaa o( uazardgus 

### Air Ppl1ut;onta and amendlaents to AQCR 702. 

### Specifically, your sullmittal seeks delegation of authority to impl-ant and enforce the followinq Federal standards: 1) the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Source C&teqo:des: General Provisions for 40 CPR Part 63, Subpart A, promulqated March 16, 1994; 2) NESHAP for source categories: Orqanic Hazardous Air Pollutants from the Synthetic organic Chemical Manufacturinq Industry and Other Processes Subject to the Negotiated Requlation for Equipment Leaks

- Hazardous Organic NESHAP, 40 CFR Part 63, Subparts F, G, H, and I promulqated April 22, 

### 1994, and subsequent oon:ection notices; ' 3) NESHAP for Source Categories: Coke Oven Batteries promulgated October 27, 

### 1994, and subsequent correction notice, January 13, 1994; 4) NESHAP for Source Cateqories: Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaninq Paoiliti
.. promulqated September 22, 1993, and the associated amendment published on December 20, 1993. Your submittal was found to be 

### complete with respect to the information necessary to grant authority to implement and enforce these Maximum Achievable Control Tachnoloqy (MACT) standards and 

# Exh. NMED 82


# . General Provisions; thus with this letter, we are delegating to the New Mexico Environment Department the authority to implement and 

### enforce these standards as they apply to major sources in 

### New Mexico. Your letter also requests that the Environmental Protection Aqency 

### (EPA) grant the New Mexico BnviroiUIItiJit Department (HMBD) full authority to implement and enforce the requirements of section 112(9) 

### of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 

### which was adopted to 

### govern modificationa to hazardous air pollutant (HAP) 

### sources. Your submittal includes 20 NMAC 2.83 

### which addressee the modification, construction, and reconstruction of HAP 

### sources. on February 14, 1995, 

### an Interpretive Notice regarding the 112

### (q) rule was published in the Federal Reqistar. This interpretive ruling postpones the effective date of section 112(9') 

### until after the 

### EPA has promulgated a rule addressing that provision. As 

### a result, it is EPA's understanding that the HJIED 

### has decided not to promulgate this requlation and has withdrawn this rule from EPA's consideration. Therefore, Region 6 

### is returninq the 20 

### NMAC 2.83 

### rule to the HMBD for future action by 

### the state. Region 6 

### is pleased that the NKED 

### is actively pursuing deleqation of federally promulgated MACT 

### standards and looks forward to working closely with you to accomplish this goal. If you have any questions or comments regarding the contents of this letter, please contact Ms. Adele Cardenas at (214) 665-7210. 

### Sincerely yours,
A. stanley Meiburg Acting Regional Administrator cc: Mr. 

### Bill Blankenship New Mexico Environment**Department~** 

# . . 

# I

(

# ( New Mexico Commission of Public Records Administnttivc Lnw Division 1205 Camino Carlos Rey

Santa Fe, NM 87507 505-476-7907 

## Affidavit ofPublication in the New Mexico Register 1, Art Brnnslord , ccrtily that the: agency noted below lms published legal notices or ntlcs in the 

### Nc:w Mexico Register. and thai payment

### has been assessed by invoice for said legal notice: or publication. which appeared ou the date: and in the volume and issue number noted below. Date**ofl'ubli~ntiun:** 8130/2013**Agcn~y:** Vulum•: XXIV bsucll: 16 F:uviroumclll**Dt:purlm~nl-** Air Qunlity C'onlact: Lany Weaver hl\'uicc II : NM/1-10/.1- J.V Anwunt: $80.00 U•scrit•lion: Nntic.: "'lilllt:l"

(seal) 525 camiuo de I.os Mnrquoz #I Samn fc. NM 87505-
Nnlic..- llfRukm;ddng. Ih:;•rinl! Nutil1." ofK.ul
..:m:•L:inl! Ikuriu)!

SIH1C or**N~w** Mcxko. ('nunty of San Ia Fe Signed und ullinnnl bcl(•rc 1110 "" Tuesday, September 03, 20 13 bv Art Bmnsford 1 .

. ' / I { Notary

# l'ublic~~ 

# 1tSnl(

# Le h.}ux Louise Wood 

### lMy comm

## i>~<'n "'p 

### Yrcs:..:C:.ol---'-i..:S)..-_...L/_],_j 

### Affiant: 

## Cb-f

# ~~P**Publisher~ Nt~u·** **kle.ric~-:,lf!;;.~.,~~** - Dntc: '1/3/20 13 -c.)ph!.'i •{iltt'**puMi:~hctl** nmtt!riul.lot·mnenl!
. .:din t/ti
... tt./!h/al'illll't! enclwt•tl
... fonn SK( "·21KJ2-U4 J<c, '":'1**Jul~** 21117



## Exh. NMED 

## 9aNew Muicu Rcgistct·/ Volume XXIV, Nulllbcr 16/August 30, 2013 581 

# Notices ofRulemaking and Proposed Rules NEW MEXICO ENERGY, MINERAL''iAND

NATtlRALRESOVJKES DEPARTMENT ENERGY CONSF.KVATION ANI) MANAGEMENT DIVISION NOTICE OF PUBLIC IIEAJUNG AND RULI;MAKING**O~'TII[** NI:W MEXICO t:NF.NG\',**MINERAL.~ A.~**  I> NA'I'IJIIAL JIESOIIIICES DEPAIITMENT lllc N\'W Mc:o.ka• Fnci\!.Y· Millcrals and Natuntl Hcsourn-s l>cpurtmcnt**(l~MNHDJ.** Encr!.!,\' Conscnution mKI MmlitJ:!I."Illcnt Dhi;i-nn will huld ll puhlk IM.'nring on**pwpo~ll** nth: dutnJ;I!'S lu tlk· Sust;.ainnhh: Buildin8 T;P.: t'n.:dit Progrmn**:u9:1~** n.m. nn**tu~.~uy.** S(plcmht-r 17. 20 IJ in Poncr Hall. \Vl·nd..•ll C'hintl Bnildinl,!. 1220 Sr•tllh S.uint Fr.mci!'1 Dri\L". Sanltl FL'. N
.. ·w Mc-"'ictl. l·.MNRU**i~ pmpt,~ini!**  dmngcs**~<•** the.•**followin~** rules: 3A.H• NM/\C'.**~u:-.tainnhl"·** Buihling l;n Cn.·tlit fc•r**l~l·:-ilklllitd Buildin~~.**  Cnrpnritli.! lnc.:lllllc**'lil:..:c:-~:** .1.4.17 NMAC.**Suo;lairmhl~** Uuillfini,! 'I':L' t'rl"\1'11 lt•r ( 'ununl·r..:ia) llurltling:s. (\,rpurntc htl'UI11l'**Tn~l!s:** J.3.21J NMI\('. Su:-HtinilhiC' lluildini,! '1;1\ l"rcdil Jt1r**R~.-silll'llliol Buildin~;s.**  l'l'rsnn.ll hu:nmc 'f;J:\l":\: ouH.I 3.3.30 NMAC, Smaainnbh;**Buillfin~** T:.' ('n:dit rtlr (.'oUIIIlCFd,Jf**lluilding~.** Jlcr.'lllll<ll Jncomc**Tn:..:c~. Prvi">:S~d** **dum{:.!!~** ru .l.·U6 Nl\,lt\C indtllk ;ttklitit•n of'**d~.~liJiitions** untl the lmn·rinl,! nfthe ;mnu;lll'iiP fr•r 1:1\**cr~tlil"** 1\,r rcsitkntial**huiltling~** In**.l:ll~."t:l 'l<ihllor~** **c:hanj?~·s.** f'ropusc:tl**ch:mgc~** to 3..1.17 NM:\f.' iudmk: lhL' midilinn ofnmltil'111llil) dwdlings to**th~.·** (h:lilliliun 

### ,,r l'Dillllll'l'dal }luiltling.**sln.:mnlinifl~** or the lil\ l'l'l."tlit illlJlliciUinn**jlrtll'\."~!'1.** umllhc**fu\\erin~** of t!JC aunu:tl cap 

### rnr t:L-.; cn.·dits l'tlf rc:mh::nltal huildint!s "' l·nnli1nn lu st:nultlr)·**dmng~.·s.** l,rupn:\<!'S**dlilii~C:'** It• 3.3.21} Nl\-!1\C**it~dudc-.** ;niJitiun nf dclinitions und lhl· 1!11\t:fln{:. ul**111~·** ;uum;il**~.·ap** l'or r.:sidcntiul 1'11.1ikling ltJ**n:n~.:~:t** s1:11111ury**diWl~l'!'l. Propl\~!.1**  clumg
... ·s hl 3.3.10 NM1\C iucltKic the ulh.lititlll uf mullilim1if\' dwdfin!!" tO 1hL' ddinilhlll or cnll1nll'rci:;J lmillling. slrCitntlirling ofthe 1:1:'1 c:n:tlil**ap~li**... ·atinn proecs:o. and tlx:**lnwl·rin~:.** 

### or thl' ;umu:lll·ap lhr cummerdnl builtlinl-!s lv cunlimu tu sluluh•IY dmlll,!l'S:.**Cupi~o.·s** l)r lhl·**~mp11sC'tl** n•k dmngc." .m:**a\':~il;tbk** rn,m**Lt\I~RJ>,** f:ncqay Omscrvntinn und**Maml~l'llll.'lll** Di\'iSitHl, 1220 S. So1int Fmucis Drh·e. Sanlit Fe. NM ,.;7505; at 

### ww''
. ..;.k:uh:rn:n:nuu ,m:: or by**~untnctin~** KL'n J**Ju~hcs** at**khJIJ:.!!~~~.!!ltt.** ll!ll..l!:S: lch:phonc**(~0~)** 476-3320. All imcrcslcd pc""'lns nmy pMiiL·ip:lll' in lhl·**hcarin~;..** omd 'rill he J,'!iYcn ''" opponunily to sul'lfnil n·k\•;1111 L'Vilfcm:e
.. \l:lf:t.**'i~.·ws.** and ilfl:!UIJIL'IIIS. ('lUll, tlr in wrili11J,'!. Thu:<C" nis:hinJ,'! lo suhmil wrille11 st:tiL'II\CI11:o. in**li~u** nr pnwilfinr: urul t...·:'limony at the hc;tring. muy suhmit**rb~ writlt:n.~tnlcm** ...**·lll~** h)' Septemhcr 10, 20IJ by 5:fK) p.m. by muil or**.:~molil. l'IL"a~**  muil wriucn commcms to 1\l•n lhl[!hc:;, EMNIU), Elk:'I'J:.)'**(on:.t~r.,.:tfmn** nnd Mullil!!l'lnentl)h·ision. 1220 Suuth So1in1
. Fr.md!'llJri\'1.'. Sotnla Fl!'. New Mexico 87505 t•r**~uhmit** Ihem,.,..**e~mailln lill.!u:.h'"~l'fuillU£.**  mn.ll!'. EMNRD will ote!.:l'J:lt no**~l<tll'Jill'llt5** ;Iller lhl' t:tmdu::-iltll ufthe hltlrinl,!. lf}'UU 01re <Ill indivillu:tl with alii:ktbilily who is ·in**nc~o.·d** of a**n:ad~r.** nmplilicr, IJII<lfilied :.ig.n**lilllJ:!.Ui~C intl-rpr~tcr.**  ur ;my other lt\I'UI or:.w,ili.tn ;till ur SCf' il.-c lv allcnd or p1.trtic1pniL' in th;ln.'tlriu'-**11le.1~** wnlnct Ken**)lu~he**.. ntlca.,l une**ww~** JJriur IU I he hCitrill!! Ill'**u~** :mon a,,.**pos~iblt:.** NEW MEXICO ENVIIWNMENTAL IMI'IWYEMENT OOARD Nl 'IV M EX ll'O ENVIIWNMI·.N l'i\1. IMI'I!I>VI'MI·N I BUAIID NOfll'l-.UF**IHIIE~MKJNC;** IIF.i\lliNU
Ihc Nl"\\ \1c\it:l} 

### r:n, irt•l1111l'IIIUI Improvement BOJml ('"Bunni") will lu,ld ;1 puhlic**hc:~ring** t'l'l Nu\**~.·mhcr** 7, 2013 nt 10:00 alll. in l(tulm J11 111 lh
... • Stnle ( itpilnl. ltleaU."ll ut ·I'XJ Ohl S;n11a F1.· Trail in "i;!nla l'c. Nt.'t\' Mc:'\il'n. 'J he purpose of the hc:triiiJ,'!**i~** lu**~.·vn<id~r** llll' tnillll'r ufEIB 13-0b(R).**mlj)us~o.·tl** n:pio.·od 

### ,,r t\ir l)ualiry l't\nlml**Rc~:;ulalitm** 10.l.HH**N~.·w** !\·Iesko ,\iJmini:-;tnuiw Ctldc (Fmi:-..-:iun**Slundarlf~** fttr New f\lnlllT Vdti\:k!>.) {"20.2.1<R**N~Ml").** Jhl' propuncnt 

### ,.r lh
... ·s.e rcsuhtiOI) arul.'ndrm:lll!>.i:- lhl·Nc\1: Ml·.,kuEtl\'irnnml'lll Dl'lmri!UCII( ("N.\IJ·.J)"),**Th~;** purpt,sc of the puhlic**hc~ring** is In consider anti l:t'-:e**pt~"ihla.·** ul.liun on ·' pl!litiun frnm NMC.D Ill r... •pcul :!0.2.11:8 Nl\·IAC. 11tis**r.;l!U~llitm. snmetim.,·~**  L·:dled "l'killl**Ca~·· WI~S**  first i!dtlp!l'd i11 2007 It, uppl) tlw (.'alilbniin motor \'1.•hiclc**cmiso;:ji)~S slatnl;~rds.**  ,,,. •·('alifttrnia**~lilllditrll:-.'"** "'itlnn NL"w Mcxic<l**hc~innin~** \\ ith mudd yc;.r 2011. The slotrl d:t11.' W<L" liltl'r n:vis1.•d to 20Jti. i\1 the rimc th:11 the Hoard**ildopt~o.·d** lhc Clean C;us n:.'(!Ulittilll1, tht: l'illifurnioJ :o;landurd!' n-cre murc**stdn{:.~·nt** lhan the fcdcral mntnr whide**emission~ ~t:tndar.ls.**  Hmv...·vl·r.**~inc~·** lhal lime lhc li:dl.'r.tl prog.mnls have been re,·iscd lc1 achieve**th~.·** SIUllt:**l!'nlissin~** rcdut:tion os Jhc Cnlirorni<t standards.**1\~** .o tcsull.**lh~** mlminislmlive bunlcns of implamcnting the Ckan C'nrs**r~.·~ulollinn** nnw nulwci{!.h lhc polcnlial !-.:nl!'lits: oflm\ing a Sl:tle**pro~n1m.** TIM.· tc\t of the n:&:uhllion propfl::ied rur n:jll'itl may (lC revicwL'tl**durin~;** n::guh1r**btt:o.iu~"** hour:. nt lhc NMED 1\ir Quality Burt:iiU**um~.·c.** 525 Cmnino dl:' los M;lrtiUCZ. Suilc 1. Sant;t Fe. New Mexico, 1m NMED'::- ·,,.,ch .site ru "-ww.nmcnv.sl;llc.nm.us. nr by cont;K:ImJ:'! L.my Wl'II\'Cr nt (:505)**.J76~4322** i)r**l:lfly.wen,:cr:tfstule.nm.tt'~.** 'J he hco1ring \\'ill hc conducted in nccnrdomc.: with 20.1.1**NMI\C(Kulcnlukin~** l'wccdun:s

-**t~n\** irunmL'IItal**lm~rovcm~!l** llonnJ), lh1.· Em·immnentul lmprmcmc:nf Act, NMSA I'J78. §74-J-9. the ;\ir Q1111lily Comrull\ct. NMS1\ 197K.**§7<1-2~().** ;uxl iln) ;applicuhlc pnxcdural orders. 1\11**intcrl~lcil JX~ns**  wiU he**~iven** fl':.IS<Jttnblc Opf>tlrlunity :al lh.: lll.'<lring to 'iuhmil n:IL•vnnt C\**j,J,·u~.·c:.** tklhl.**view~** aniJ**,,rgumcnl~** llr.JII)' or in writill(!:. to inlrodUl'C**c"hihit~,** mnllu C!\ilminc "itn
... ·$..'il'S.**PL"~ons** wbhing lo prcSt.'llt t

... -.:hnknllcstimuny must Iii.: "ith the lh••arlf a wriucn nolicc

### orinlt:'llt ltJ tiel so.**Tht~** uulil'c ttt'**int~'lll** shall: (I) idt:<111ify tlw p,:r:.tm for v:hum the**witn~·M,(C,'i)** willtc:o.rily: (2) idt:nlil}' e;lch tcdmicul**willll'~:i** tlmt the pl'rsun intends 111 present ;md**~talc** lhc**qua~lilkntiuns** ttf th" \\itiJCSs. indulfiny. a Jcscriplinn nl' their Ctlnealinn ,tnrJ \\·tnk Nldi.gmund: (3) indulll' t1 e•'I'Y oflhL' tlil'l't:ttco;tinwn_> in tmmni,•t· Jim111)reach tt:chnknl**witn~.·:-.s;** (.f) hsr ami aum·lt**c.:t~:h** c'\hiflilnnlkip;IIL'd lu ht: urli:n:lf by thai p... ·r.st'll :11 tbl.'**hc;U'in~:** anll (5) all:ll'h lht' text uf :111y**n=cnnmlclld~:tl** mutlilit:ttlions 10**Ill~ ~rof>l.l...Cd**  rL"gul<tltH) chaug.c. NDiiCl'S 

### ,,r inlcnt ror !he**llcnrin~** J'IU'' be**h!l'd~tcd** in lhc Ollicc of thl· Bt,urd nt)t luler tlum5:00 pm un Oetnhcr IM, 21113 m111 shouftl**rcr~.·rcnl'C** lht:**IJOCk.l!lllUmi'J(r,l~lll** J). (lf,(l{).**;u~llhc** dnlc oftbc ll•:nrin,ll N'olicc!-> of intent 10 prcstnl IL'l'hnil·al**tc::-limnn~ ~hnuhl**  be :o.uh111ilh:d tt•· Pmn**C~t~litik:tla.** Bourd Admillll-lnll•''**(lfli~o.:c** 

### ,,r tht.· Emironmcntal lmflrO\'l'lllcnl Bnanl llarold Hunncl:s Buil!.ling 1190 !'-.1. huncis Dr., Room**210U~S** S,tnli1 Fe. NM 87.5U.S Phun1.·: (505)**M27~2·125.** fux (.S05) K27-2t06582 New Mexico Rcgisler I Volume XXIV, Nu111bcr Hi 1Augusl 30,2013



# (**t~tslil)** ul ltll.' h\.":tdng.. No priur IUllific.tlhm is**rL~quin'tf** to**,,.~sent nun-IL"l'hnk:~l**  h!Stimtm) 111 th..: hL"<lring. Any stk"lt OIL'mhcr may ulso**nll~r c~hihit~**  in Ct>nncL·Iiun '"'ith his h.'Siimun),**~,** hmt: il.5 tl'k.' L'.'dtihit is nc 11 undul)**rcpditi1111.~** uflh!: tcs.tilntm). A mcmhcr ufthc g.clh.'ml pnhlk nho**wish~.:='** 111 submit " \HiiiCit stuh.'ll)('tll fur the n.·con.l. in lieu of pn.n•iding urul h:!'limt"1)· oil tht' hcarinJr,. :'ih;dl fik the writh:n Sloltcmcnl priut 1u thl!'**ltcmin~** ,,. :-.uhmit il <If llu.• hcnrinJ,!. PlTson:.**hm·in,~t** a Uisahility .and 11L'\'ding hdp in hdnl! it p;ut ufthis he;tring**prn~:t:!os** should cnntncl the J.C llum:_!!n nf the NMEIJ IIuman nc!'•UUI\:'CS Bun:uu ") (Jclnlll:r IM. 2HI3 at P.Cl Dllx .S-1(,9, IJl)() St. 1-'rnnd:-;. Dri\·e,;. Su111a Ft.:. Nt.:\\' Mc;\icO.**87~U2-5461J.** h:lcphon..:**~05-R27-0.J2-I.** J'DY usL'r"**pktt~C'** ,tcec..._ .. his numhcr Hit lhL' Nc'' ML'.'\iCt> Rdny Nci\Hlli.. <II }
..g(XJ-M9-K3J I. The Bu:ml mn} make n lkthoiun on 1hc pmposcJ**1'\!Yi~d rc,~:ul;.uions**  ill 1hc ..:tmdusion ul' lhr hc,trinl!. or Ill\.' Bnanl lniiY ..:c)nYCO\' ol m-:..:ting: nt a later daiL' In**l.'tmsi~lt:r** oc1iun on the**IH'Upt~·lll. NJ~WMEXICO**  ENVIJWNMENTAL IMPROVEMENT HOARD**~I'W** MI·X:CO**ENVIRON~HONTAL I~·IPHOVFMFNT**  IIOAI!O NIH ICI· 01 I!IJLFMAKINO llb\I!IN(; The NL'\\**~·le,:\iL·o** l:m·inmmcJIIul lmpro\L"mcnl IJPnrd**l·-l~tMrtr}** \\ill lu,ltl a publk hL·;u mg on 'NnH·mhcr 7, 2UB ;tt 10:00 ,, m. in noom .lll :11 lhe SliJh: ('npiH>L h
..**"'.·al~"\1** ill ·190 Old Somlil Fe lr;til in Sunla FL· Nl'\\ Me\ico. 'I h..:**rurr·'='~** nf I he hcuriug. is Ill Cltll,.idL'f lhC' muller

### or EIB 13-07{R). t•fllpuSt·J olllh!'Jllil!lL'nl" In Air t)uulit.' Cuntrol 1{'-'!!tdaliom. 20.2.77 N.::w Ml!'xku**.1\dmini:-tmth·~** CtlliL' (N!:\\ Svurcc Pl·riOmlilllC!: Slarxlanl") (
..211 2.77 Nf'>lt'\l'''j and :!0.2.82 Ne\\ ,\k\ict' i\llminislr.llivc CtlJ"·**(~-l;l\i111Ulll** ,\dJi.::\'ilhk nmtrul 'I.L·chnoft,g) "lunJant,. li1r Snur..:c t·.lll.'t;••riL':i nf lhll.:trdou:; 1\ir Pnllul<llll!i) ("2U.2JQ NMAC). The pnapunl'lll ul' thl.'"C n:gui;Ullf)' ;uncmtm"·nb b. tlw t\C"\\ Mc\k·v Em·in.,nm..:nl Dcp;trlm"·nl (
.. 1\':\11-lr). 'I h"·**JlllTJlU~"·** uf 1111..· public**heMin~** b tu ··cmsidcr mal taJ.."· l:tos:-ihk actiun un il ( ·tition frum "'MFD 1t1 ;mwnd 2U.2.n**'11~** I1\C :mJ 20.2.81 NMAC. The purpu:-.c of the**propt1~·U Wlll.'llllnwnl~**  is lc• iJM.'Ol'J'IOf.th: hv rcfcrcn.::c Ill\' n"·w**mk~.** corrc-dhln:o. f'-:\'iSiClll,., Ollld Unll!'nthnl!'llt" IU lh._• li:ckr;ll N"·w Source Pcrfommncc**Slandard~** t"NSPS")mxJ Ma\imumAchic,·ahlc C.'uutml 'IL"Chnolo(!)'**Stand~trJs** for Snurc'-'**l'olh:~ori"·s** nl' lla1;trlknts Air**l'tliiiJtmU~** (''MAlT"). "hiL'h wl!re Jlrutnulg.ul!:tl hy thL· I I.S. Em imnnwnlal I''Wil'l1iun**Ag.'-'IIL"~** (''LPA'') illhl puhli.c;hL'tl in the h'tll.'nd Kcgi:-h:r frnm J:muar}· J, 20illuAul!u.c;l 29, 2013 Ihi.' pmp.lSI.'d**I'C\·is~tJ**rcg.ul;•litii'L". and Ilk.' IL':\1 ul'thc fc-Jcral l>UmJo1rJs Ill t..._. inc••rptlfiii'-'J hy n:fcrl·ncc-. 11111) ,..,_. r..·viC\\c-d during**n:~ulnr** husinc.ss huun; ;II lhl! Nf\H.m Air Qlmlity lltln!ilU olTICl".**~25** Cmu'111o lie lo,.**~brqucz.** Suitt: J, Somtu Fe-. Ne.:w Mcxieu, nn**NMFIY~** \\C'h :"ill.' nl \\ \\ W.lllllCII\'.S/ciiC.IIlll.US, Ul' hy L'Uillucting L.m)· We:nn•r m (50:5) -17b--U22 ur**lun~.wt:a\·c:r:t.f:st.u**..·.nm.u,, rh..:**hc-c~ring.** \\ill he**~.·nndm:t!!ll** in**""''-'urdam:~·** \\oitl1 20.1.1 NMAC**~Rukmaking Pn~.:cllures** 

- Lnvirnmncnlitl hnpmWIIlL'Ill lltJOirtl). lhc**l~nvirnumcnt.al** lmprnn:tncnl /\..:1. NMSA IIJ7K. §7•1·1-9. lhe Air Qu:1lit) CuntroiAcl. NMSt\ 197!t**~74·2-b.** aud omy rlf)plic;Jblc procc-tllrml or!lcn:. All iniL--n:SIL'd f>L'11'1HlS will ll\· M.lwn n.:IIS4.MiiJhlt: uppu11u11it) ,u the- hc;nilll! It, submit rd.::vnnt**l'\'ill~.:nL"l.'.** dnla. YiL'\\s mul '"ltllll'I(RIS.. tmtlly or in \Hiling. Ill inln•ducc cshihits. mulln**e~aminL'** ''ituc''!ol'S. Pcr.;un!' wi:;hing ltl prcse:nl 1ct.:hllicillle,limun) must file with Ihi!' Btl;lfll il wrillc-n nuli!.:L' ur inlC'nt In du !1=11. Th
.. •nc,lirc- nfilllcul
..hall: (I)**iU~·ntiry** the.: t...:,.un i{•r whmn the wiln'-'s:>(L's) willl'-·:·ilil): (2) idcnlify I!'<!Ch tc-dmkal ''i1Ucs.'1 that the**,-...~r"ii..'ll** iniL'IMI'i In prt'!'Ot"lll alltl**~lak• th\~**  lJUillilkntiuns uf the \\'tln..:s.'. indudin(! il dL'::;L'fiplitlll or lltcir t.:dl""illiUII ;ml.f Wlll'J..: hadgmund; (;\) ind1rtk a**WJl~** nfthc direl.'ltcslimi•HY in m1rmth
.. • 1\mn ul'L'iiCh t

..·chni..:;.ll \\ ilnL'.'I"i; t-llli$1 .md illlndtl!'a..:h L'\hihit unticipulcJ lo h...· olll:rL'\J lly lhnl**pcrsc~n** al I he hc-llrinJ:!: ami (51 at1ad1 !Ill' l'-'\1 ul'**,m~·** J'l"t:'llllllllCJl(i.:tl mudilkilliou,; h> lh"· pmrm::\.·d l'C,I!lllallll)' L'hungl' Ntllicc.; 

### ,,r int"·nt**l~lr** 1hc**hemin~** mu:o1 lw**rce~in"l** in the IUlin· t'f 1hc BL•ard not lill'-'r**Jl~o~n ~:110**  pm un Ochlhcr IX, 2UI3 anti ,.lwuld**rdl:r~·ncc** theJnd.L'Inumh..:t, HB 1J07(H), und tlw tlat'-' 1•f'llw hL-;.trint;. N11licc:-. Of inlcnl lo pr'-'SCII1 IL'dlllicaJ 11.'!-limuny slwuhl be suhmill'-''ltu: Pum (';Jslm'IC'du. Buar\1 AdmirJislralnr**om~·c:** 

### .,r 1h"· Envirctnmcntal lmrru'l'nll'nt BuarJ JlumiJ**l~tllliiL'I!'** Buildinl:c! II 1

JII Sl. Fliln..:is Dr., RtMIIIl 21111)..5 Sarna Fl.', NM**lH~05** Phunc:**(~U5)** H27-2425. Fa.\ (5U5) X27<!X1fi Any meml,..•r or che l!cncral puhlic m;1y Jcsti(y :II th"" llL"nring.. Nn pritlf' nutilicution**j~** T'-'tJilin:"d IO p!'\.'SI.'IU**non~IL·.::hnical tc~timony**  rU lhl.' hL•uring.. Any such lllL'Illl-..:r nu1.\' ulsu uOi:r C.'\hihil::: in cunllL"Ciinn with hi::: lcslinu,ny. su long. liS tlk:**c.~hihit** is nut umlul)· rcpcliliuus uflhc 1"-slimuny. r\ rm:mlx·r 

### ,,flhc JJ.encrnl puhlic who wi!!ihe,; In :mhmil ;1 wrilh:n sUnt.•mcnl lOr the rc..:urd. in li'-'11 

### ur prm·iding ural '"'Siimuny al the hcilrinM:. sh;lll file lhc wriucn slah:mcnt prior lu the h\:aring..lll' suhmil il illlhc hCOlring.. l,ef':iOJbi havinJ,! ildisnhilil)' mld**nc~:ding** help in hdng. a p;11t uflhis hearing pnll:c."iS sht)Uitl conlm::l the .J.C. llnrn:go 

### ur 1l1c**N~1EI>** Umn:.ln Rcsnurcc!\**Bu~au** hy Oclobl."r IH, 2UI.l al**1~0.** llox 5·161 J, 1190 St. Fmnd:; l>riw. Sunla h!, New Mcxi"·u,**K7~02·Hf,IJ.** tdcpiUIIIL' 505-827-0.J2.t. TD\' use.:rs rlc;tSt' aL·.::C!'I." his numhcr ''ill the NL"w Me-xico f{d;ty Nc-tworL :11 J-MUO-M 1 J-K.1.'lJ. The Hunrd may mnk(' u dL."tisiun 1111 !Ill'**propu~l** r.::\·i:.;cd n:gulmiuns oil tl1c**cnndn~ionof** the !)(;Iring, nr lhl' lloanl 111<1)' conwn.:: :1**nJL-clin~** :11 :1 lolltr tl:lll!' tu cm1sidc-r u"·litm c•n I he**Jlll•J'It~al.** NF..W MEXICO 1-IIC:JfER EI>UCATJON J)EI'Aill'MF.N'f Nt:W f\U'XIC() I!IGIItR EJ)I/CATION l)t:I,AUIMENT The llighcr Ethn:;•liun lkpartJIIL"IJI 

### t··u..**·p~lnml.'nf)** Jteh:hy l!i\'t'S ncllkc llml 1hc DqJ;trlmelll will CLlflthl\.'l a puhlil' he.tl'lll(.!. ill 20:JM (j;,lisiCII Slrt"\'1. S:lniOI r:c. \1\1**X7S0~-** 2f(l(). on Ocll'""-'f I, 21ll3,1i'um J(I:OO ol.lll. 1t1 12:00 p.m. The- purpt1S\' llr Ilk.· puhlic lw:Jrillt; will he In ul•luin input tm thl!' folltlwin,bt rufcls):

){ 'ollliiiW'I/**Wlflll~l'** 5.\'Jj

### (



# ( ALBUQUERQUEJOURNAL THE SUNDAYJOURNAL 

# * l!ilJJ;jJi122 .,.Aibuquerque Publishing Company 

## :::WZ 7777 Jeff- N.E.Albuquerque, N- Melllco 87109

P.O. DrawerJ-TAlbuquerque, New Mexico 87103

N M DEPT OF ENVIRONMENT AIR QUALITY BUREAU 1301 SILER RD BLDG B SANTA FE NM 87507

Qallrlilb julie CU!tonwr

### EMe"**~** $109.62 Ill6m111DS $7.67 IQSI1Amount $117.29 AmoyntDyt $117.29
b5l!lll5l Albuquerque Journal 6slltumb•t**00010917~1** 

### MJDI APC-legals 6UID : 1.0X 174 U**~** <NONE> RynDttn 812812013
Allldavlll 0

1112612013 9:48:57AM (5051 823-7777 Afspunt Nymftr 1007584 

### Ad Proof 

### I Order Confirmation AdOnftr Nlftnbtr 0001091701

CJal!!nar Pbont 5Q5.827·1494 PO NUfnbar chambers lt!nBtp OnltrI•ktn by; ravrntnt M!tbod Peyment.Amgynt pnorman pnorman

Plfstnwnt Cla!alflsJSJon

1 JofmAdl

$0.00 legal Notices Govemment-0000 NEVvMEXICOENVIRONMENTALIMPRO**VEMENTBOARDNOTICEOFRULE~**



## Exh. NMED 9b8/26/2013 9:4li:57AM 2 

### Ad Proof I 

### Order Confinnatlon Acspynt Nymbtr 1007114 Ad OalvHymbtr 0001091701 N M DEPT OF ENVIRONMENT



## (

# (

,' f

812612013 9:46:57AM 3ALBUQUERQUEJOURNAL THE SUNDAY JOURNAL 

### ltJllllli)25 

### Albuquerque Publishing Compa:;n::y:Riiilliai!:.pj:e;ij;jjililiP;;; 7777 Jefferson N.E.Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109

P.O. DrawerJ-TAlbuquerque, New Mexico 87103**(505~** 823-7777

N M DEPT OF ENVIRONMENT AIR QUALITY BUREAU 1301 SILER RD BLDG B SANTA FE NM 87507

Onltmd By julie CwtpmerEMail
TgAmqunt TqtllAmount Amguntp111 $127.89 $8.95 $136.84 $136.84

AdNymbtr !LlDI A!l.1!l!**~** RynDatg Albuquerque Journal 0001091715-01 APC.Legals

Al!ldtyb 0 : 1.0X 203Li <NONE> 812812013

812812013 9:51:52AM Asegynt Nymbtr 1007514 

### Ad Proof

### I Order Confirmation Ad Onltr Nymb!r 0001081715

Cuftomer Phqnt POHumbtr 

### '''"RIP OtsltrI1k1R by; PtymtolMttbOd PlymtnlAmpynt 505-827·1494 chambers pnonnan pnonnan

Pla§IDltnt Claumsatlon llll1.l"!!! fiW!2! Join!Ad I

$0.00
Legal Notices GOII91"M1ant-0000 DIRECCIONDEMEJORASMEDIOAMBIE NTALESDENUEVOMEXICOAVISODEAU

### ( ALBUQUPJIQUEJOVRNAL Till! S!JNDO.Y )a.JRNAL ·····>**~-'·~.Aibuquerque** Publlshllll C:IKII"pJfl'l Q**w~­** .,.,..,._N..L Quq•errpe.....Male171Dt

P.O. .,.....,.T I' I que.Newllnloe17UB 1505Jfm-7f77 

### Ad Proof

### I Order Conflnnatlon
Acc9Ynt Nymbtr 1007184 Ad Ordv Nymbtr 0001011711 

### N M DEPT OF ENVIRONMENT

23

## (



# ( SUSANA MARTINEZ Gm::rnor JOliN A. SANCHEZ lieutermnt Governor 

### July 1, 2013 NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT 

## Air Qttality B11rea11 $2$ Camino de los Ma"!uez Suite I Santa fe, NewMexico, 87505 Pl10ne (50S) 476-4300 l'u (SOS)**47~-4375** www.mnenv.stulc.nm.us



### Dear Air Quality Stakeholder, RYAN FLYNN ('abint.'t**Stxretacy~gnate** BUTCHTONClATE Dc.11\l1V S4..'Cn."tarv



### Forthe past 30 ycnrs,tbc New Mexico EnviromncntDepartment (NMED) has taken delegation for implementation and enforcement ofmany ofthe 

### feuenll air quality standards adopted under Chapter

### 40 ofthe Code of

### Federal Regulations (CFR), Parts 

### 60 (New Source Performance Standards, orNSPS), 61 

### (Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, orNESHAP) and 63 

### (Maximum AchievableControl Technology Standards for Source Categories ofllazardous Air Pollulllnts, or MACT). These fedenll niles are incorporatedbyreference in the following state airquality rules: 20.2.77

### New Mexico Administrative Code (NMAC}-

### New Source Peifonnance Standards; 202.78

### NMAC 

### -EmissionStandards forHazardousAtr

### Pollutants: and 20.2.82 

### NMAC-

### MaximumAchievable Control Technology Stantfllrc/:sforSource Categories 

### o{JiazardottSAir

### Pollutants, respectively. In each case, the li.-deral rules that nre in ellect by a specified date are incorporatedbyreference into U1e state ntles, unless specificaUy excluded, Regardless ofwhetherthe state accepts uelcgalion for implementation ofthe tedcnil rules, the affected facilities in Nt.'W Mexico are subject to those rules becausethe 

### U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

### will directly implement those standards not delegated. The NMED periodically**request~** 

### that the Environmental ImprovementBoard (EIB) amend the state rules to advance the spcciticd date to include new oramended federal rules to 8129/2013. 

### These state rules were last amended in 2011 

### to im;orporat.: the date 12/31/2010. 

### NMED intends torequest that the EIB bold ahearing in November2013 

### to consider and update the specified dates in 20.2.77 

### NMAC and 20.2.82 NMAC, so that federal rules under40

### CFR Parts 60 

### and 63, respectively, that have been finalized

### by 7/3012013 

### will be incorporated by n.:terence into the state regulations. We arenot requesting that 20.2.78 

### NMAC be updated, as U1ere bl!ve been no amendments to the related federal rule (40 CFR Part 61) 

### since the last time ourrules were updated. Given that the delegation ofthe federal rules to !he state does not alterthe requirements that opply to facilities in this state, the periodic updates oflhodelegation rules have seldom sthrecl any interest. However, this update occurs while the EPA is in theprocess ofreconsideringparts of40 CFR Part 60 (NSPS) Subpart0000,a fc..-dcrnl rule !hat applies to manyNew Mexico sources. ll is unlikely U1at EPA will complete all ofitsrevisions to NSPS Subpart 0000

### by ( 812912013. 

### As aresult, differences may occurbetween the federal revisionof NSPS Subpart 

## Exh. NMED 10

### July 1,2013 Page 2 0000and the version ofthat n1le to be incorporated by reference in the state n1le 20.2.77 NMAC. Although it is 

### not uncommon that EPA revises rules afterthe EIB has adopted revisions to the NMAC, NMED is committed to minimizing the potential confusion that could OCC\lrin such an event. As aresult, after EPA has completed its modifications ofthe federal rule, NMED will request that the EIB reopen20.2.77 NMAC to incorporate those modificutions, in conjunction with incorporating othernew ormodified NSPS, NESHAPs orMACfs. An alternative approach would be to not accept delegation ofNSPS Subpart 0000 at all until after EPA completes its n1odifications ofthat rule. However, NMED l1as detennined that taking delegation ofNSPS Subpm1 0000 as it is now in eflect is the most appropriate option. TI1is will avoid confusion to sources about who has authority over which parts of0000, and where to send reports required by the NSPS. The Department will also meet with interested parties this summer to discuss the available options for implementing NSPS Subpart 0000. lfyou wish to make comments regarding the updates of20.2.77 NMAC und 20.2.82 NMAC, or to be notified ofthehearing at which EIB willtnkc comments and consider these rules, please contact Lany Weaver at (505) 476-4322 or lany.weaver@state.nm.us. Ifyou wish to conunent on NMJ::IJ's evaluation ofthe available options for implementing NSPS Subpu11 0000,please contact Ted Schooley at (505) 476-4334 orted.schooley@state.nm.us. or Elizabeth BisbeyKuehn at (505)476-4338 or Elizabeth.Kuehn@state.nm.us. TI1ank you for your interest in New Mell:ico

### 's Air Quality. Sincerely,

# ~u/~/rRL1 /Richard 

### L. Goodyear, 

### P.E. /

Bureau Chief 

# (

# ( Weaver, Lany, NMENV From: Sent: To: Subject: Weaver, Lany, NMENV Monday, September 23, 2013 5:33 PM Goodyear, Richard, NMENV RE: NSPS and MACT Updates
- UPDATE

This Is to provide an update regarding the upcoming regulatory hearing at which NMED will be requesting updates to 20.2.77 NMAC and 20.2.82 NMAC, the rules by which we take delegationforfederal NSPS and MACT standards, respectively. The Environmental Improvement Soard has set the hearingfor November 11, 2013 in Santa Fe. Details regarding location and the process ofsubmitting testimony orcomments to the Board are In the hearing notice, which along with otherdocuments related tothe hearing is available on NMED's website at http:l/www.nmenv.state.nm.us/aqb/prop regs.html. Please note that NMED Is planning to request an amendment to our proposal. As proposed, 20.2.77 NMAC would state that we will take delegation offederal NSPS standardsthat are published in the Federal Register through August 29, 2013. This date was chosen because Itwas the day priorto publication ofthe hearing notice in the New Mexico Register; usingthat datewould allow any interested partyto review new and revised federal rules for at least 60 days priorto the EIB hearing. Because NSPS Subpart 0000was finalized on August 6, we expected that itwould be published well before August 29. Unfortunately, EPA was delayed in publishing 0000 in the Federal Register until today lhtto:l/www.goo.gov/fdsvs/pkg/FR-2013-Q9.23/pdf/2013-22010.odfl. As a result, NMED will be requesting that our proposal for 20.2.77 NMAC be amended to usethe date September 23,2013 instead. We believe this is appropriate because the finalized Subpart 0000 has been available for review throughout the public comment period, and no other NSPS were published inthe Federal Register between August 29 and September 23. Ifyou have any comments or concerns regarding the Department's planned request to amend our proposal, please let me know. Thank you, LanyWeaver New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau (SOS) 476-4322 From: Weaver, Lany, NMENV Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 4:24PM To: Goodyear, Richard, NMENV Subject: NSPS and MACT Updates Please find attached a letterfrom Richard Goodyear, NMED Air Quality Bureau Chief, regarding the upcoming updates to the state delegation offederal NSPS and MACT rules. Ifyou wish to make comments regarding the updates (to be reflected in 20.2.77 NMAC and 20.2.82 NMAC) orto be notified ofthe hearing atwhich EIB will take comments and consider these rules, please contact me at this address orthe phone number below. Ifyou wish to comment on NMED's evaluation ofthe available options for implementing NSPS Subpart 0000, please contact Ted Schooley at (SOS) 476- 4334 orted.schooley@state.nm.us, or Elizabeth Bisbey-Kuehn at (505) 476-4338 or Elizabeth.Kuehn@state.nm.us. Thank you, LanyWeaver New Mexico Environment Department 1 

## Exh. NMED 11AirQuality Bureau (505) 4764322

2 

# (

# (



# ( UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON. DC 20460



## AVC 30 2Ciic

MEMORANDUM SUB.JECf:

FROM:
THRU:

TO: 

### Inadvertent Errors in the Final Rule, Oil and Natunll Gas Sector; Reconsideration of Certain Provisions ofNew Source l'erfonnance Standards (Tier 3, SAN 5693, 

### RIN 2060·AR75) 

### ·Correction ofInadvertent Errors Janet G. 

### McCabe

### ::,<:>-.:I~ ActingAssistant Administrator Loric Schmidt

# Q 

# j Associate General Counsel Ollice of(Jeneral Counsel (2344A) Michael Goo**~** 

### (, ' Associate Administrator Office ofPolicy (1806A) Gina McCarthy EPAAdministmtor (110IA) Three inadvertent errors W<-'I"C 

### made in 

### the process of preparingthe signaturepackage forthe final rule. Oil and Natural Gas Sector; Reconsideration ofCenain Provisions ofNew Source Perfonnancc Standards, which was signed on August 2, 2013. The auachcd red-line/strike-out version ofthe preamble and rule identifies these errors and shows the corrected text. These corrections are described**belo~N. 1**  

### Preamble; Page 27, first paragraph, is amended hy changing "October 15,**2015~to** 

### "Aprill5,**2015~** to 

### state correctly that all Uroup I storage vessel affected facilities must meet the control requirements by April IS, 2015. The regulatory 

### text correctlypresents this date in §60.5395(d)(l)(ii) on page 120, 

### This change**correcL~** 

### the inadvertent error 

### in the preamble.

1 

### Note that thepage DUmber

### cited refers to the redline/strikeoutversion ofthepreamble and rule; Lite corrections could occur earlierorlater in the corrected ,·ersion. 

# Exh. NMED 

# 12**or:e'""'~** 4,;ces..,**~JR,** • t•:1r '-'""··" €;>!1 !)"tot Rtryc!NiiRcc'(r:lablt> • C:;r-·•t<iC v.-,r!•**Vwj~:£t:::P::** •:O•l 2·->:2.::**:-,,~on ~o:C**  f C':-l<:o:·.,,,.,,.;:;,**;lo,,y_z·~;,** (:i'>I'Jc•f'•·l n"**;~-.-.,** ..ct.;;rt ri':r.t·<Regulatory text: Page I 14, "§60.5365 

### Am I subject to this subpart?" paragraph (e), third sentence, is amended by inserting the word ·•average"between "maximum"Wid "daily." Our intent is to allow owners and operators to detennine emissions based on the average throughput over the number ofdays for which**~voughput** can be detennined using infonnation already available (e.g., records ofcrude oil orcondensate collected from the storage vessel) during a 30-day period, regardless ofthe frequency ofsuch collections within the 30-day period. Tite existing text could be interpreted to 

### mean that daily throughput measurements are required, which was not ourintent. This change con-eels that inadvertent error. Page 115, "§60.5365 Am 

### I subject to this subpart?"paragraph (e), third sentence, is amended by changing "the 30-day period" to ·'a 30-day period."' As written, the text could be inteipreted to require that the period over which the dctemtination ofmaximum average daily throughput is the 30 days immediately preceding the applicable compliancedeadline, which was not ourintent. We made ourintent clearon**pa~e** 38 ofthe preamble where we state, "Ifthe VOC

### PTE ofthe Group 

### I storage vessel is 6 tpy or greater on October 15,2013 (or an earlier date ifthe owneroroperator chooses to make the determination priorto October 15, 2013), then the storage vessel is a Group 1 storage vessel affected facility
..."The change described above corrects that inadvertent error in the regulatory text. We recommend correction ofthese inadvertenterrors.

Gina McCarthy, Administrator. 

### AUG 

### 30 2013 Date 

### (



## (

### ExhibitNMED 13 Selected Provisions ofCAA §§ 

### 111 & 

### 112

UnitedStatesCodeAnnotated

Title42
.ThePublic HealthandWelfare Chapter 85.AirPollutionPrevention andControl (Refs BtAnnos)

SubchapterI
.Programa andActivities

PartA.AirQualityandEmissions Limitations (Refs & Annos) 42 U
.S
.C.A. § 7411 § 7411. Standardsofperformancefornew stational)·sources

(a) Definitions Forpurposes ofthis section: (I) The term "standard of performance" means a standard for enussions of air pollutants which reflects the degree of erruss1on hmatat1on achievable through the application ofthe best system ofemassaon reducnon which (tak.ing into aceount the cost ofachieving such reduction and any nonair quality health and enworunental impact and energyrequirement!) the Administrator detemunes hu been adequatelydemonstrated
. (l)The tenn "neweource" means any stationary**so~.** the construction ormodification ofwhich is commeoced after the publication ofregulationa (or, ifearlier, proposed regulations) prescn"bing a standard ofperforma.nce under this section ( which willbe applicable to such source. (3) The term "stationary source" means any building, struccure, facility, or installation which emits or may emit any air pollutant Nothing in subchapter ll ofthis chapter relating to oonroad engines shall be construed to apply to stationary internal combustion engines. (4) The term "modification" mcaru any physical change in, or change in the method ofoperation of , a stationary source which increases the amount ofany airpollutantemitted by such source orwhich results in the emissionofany airpollutant notpreviously emitted
. (!)Theterm "owner oroperator" means any person who owns, leases, operates,controls,orsupervises a stationary source. (6)Theterm "existing source" means any stationary source otherthana new source. (1)The term "technological systemofcontinuous emission reduction" means-

(A) a technological processfor productionoroperation byanysource which itinherently low-pollutin& ornonpolluting, or (B) a technological system for continuous reduction ofthe pollution generated by a source before such pollution is emitted into the ambientair,includingprecombustion cleaning or treatment offuels
.

1 

## Exh. NMED 13

### (



# c ExhibitNMED 13 

### SelectedProvisions ofCAA §§ 

### lll & 

### 112

(8) A conversion to coal (A) by reason of an order \lllder aection 2(a) of the Energy Supply and Environmental Coordination Act of 1974 [IS U.S.C.A § 792(a) ] or any amendment thereto, or any subsequent enactment which supersedes such Act [IS U
.S
.C
. A § 791 et seq.], or (B) which qualifies undersection 7413(d)(S)(A)(ii) ofthis tide, shall not be deemed to be a modification forpurposes ofparagnphs(l)and (4)ofthis subsection. (b) List ofcategories ofstationary sources; standards ofperformance; information on pollution control techniques; sources owned oroperatedbyUnited States; particularsystems; revised standards

(l)(A) The .Administrator shall, within 90 days after December 31, 1970, publish (and from time to time thereafter shall revile) a listofcategories ofstationary soun:ea. Heshall include a category ofsources in such list ifinhisjudg,nentitcauses, orcontributes significantly to, airpollutionwhich mayreasonablybeanticipated to endangerpublic health orwelfare. (B)Within one yearafter the inclusion ofa categoryofstationary sources ina Jistunder subparagraph (A), the Administrator shall publish proposed regulat ions, establishing Federal standards ofperformance for new sources within such category. The Administrator shall afford interested persons an opportunity for written comment on such proposed regulations. After considering such comments, be shall promulgate, within one year after such publication. such standards with such modifications as be deems appropriate. The Administrator shall, at least every 8 yean,review

### a.od. ifappropriate, revise such standards following the procedure**~ired** by this subsection for promulgation of such standards
. Notwithstanding the rcquimnentsofthe previous sentence, the Administrator need not review any such standar d ifthe Administrator detenn.ines that such review iJ not appropriate in light ofreadily available information on the efficacy of such standard. Standards of performance or revisions thereofshall become effective upon promulgation. When implementation and enforcement ofany requjrement ofthis chapter indicate that emission limitations and percent reductions beyond those required bythe standards promulgated under this section are achieved inpractice, the Administrator shall, when revising standards promulgated under thi& section, considerthe emission limitations andpercentreductions achieved inpractice. (l) The Administrator may distinguish among classes, types, and aizes within categories ofnew sources for the purpose of establishing suchstandards
. (3) The Administrator shall, from time to time, issue information on pollution control techniques for categories ofnew sources and airpollutants subjectto the provisions ofthis section. (4)Theprovisionsofthis section shall apply to anynew source ownedoroperated bytheUnitedStates. (!) Except as otherwise authorized under subsection (h) ofthis section, nothing in this section shall be construed to require, or to authorize the Administrator to require, any new or modified source to install and operate any particular technological S)'lltemofcontinuous emission reductionto complywith anynew source standard ofperformance
. (6) The revised standards ofperformance required by enactment ofsubsection (a)(l)(A)(i) and (ii) ofthis section shall be promulgated not later than one year after August 7, 1977
. Any ocw or modified fossil fuel fired stationary source which commences construction prior to the date ofpublication ofthe proposed revised standards shall not be required to comply withsuchrevised staodards
. (c) State unplementation and enforcement ofstandards of performance (1) Each State may develop and subm1t to the Adrrunistrator a procedure for unplernenung and enforcmg standards of performance for new sources located in such State. If the Administrator finds the State procedure is adequate, he shall 2

### ExhibitNMED 13 Selected Provisions ofCAA 

### §§ 111 

### & 112 ( delegate to IUCh Stateany authorityhe has under thischapter to implement and enforce auch standards
.



# ( (l) Nodung in this subsection shall prohibit the Adm.in.iatrator from enforemg any applicable standard ofperformance under this aection. 

# •

• 

# • • 

# •

United StatesCodeAnnotated

Title42.ThePublicHealth andWelfare Chapter 85.AirPollutionPrevention andControl (Refs &Annos)

SubchapterL ProgranuandActivities

PartA. AirQualityand EmissionsLimitations (Refs8cAnnos) 42 U.S.C.A. §7412 § 7412. Hazardous airpollutants Effective: August5, 1999 

## • 

# • • (d) EmlssJon standards (1) Ia

### aenual

The Administrator shall promulgate regulations estabhshing erruss1on standards for each category or subcategory ofmajor sources and area sources of hazardous air pollutant3 listed for regulation pursuant to subsection (c) of this section in accordance with the schedules provided in subsections (c) and (e) of this section
. The Administrator may distinguish among classes, types, and sizu ofsoUICCS within a category or subcategory in establishing such standards except that, there aha1l beno delay inthe compliance date for any standard applicable to any sourceundea- subsection (i)ofthis section as the resultofthe authorityprovided bythis sentence. (l) Staadardsand methods

Emissions standards promulaatcd under this subsection and apphcable to new or exiSting sources of hazardous au pollutant3 shall require the maxunum degree of reduction in emissions of the hazardous air pollutants subject to this section (including a prohibiuon on such emissions, where acb1cvable) that the Administrator, taking into consideration the cost of achieving such emiss1on reduction, and any non-air quahty health and envrronmental impacts and energy requirements, determines is acruevable for new or existing sources in the category or subcategory to which such emiss1 on standard applies, through application ofmeasures, processes, methods, systems ortechniques including, butnot limited to, 

### measures which-

(A) reduce the volume of, oreliminate euWsions of, such pollutants through process changes, substitution ofmaterials orothermodifications, (B)enclosesystemsorprocessesto eliminateemissions, (C)collect, capture ortreat suchpollutants whenreleasedfrom a process,stack,stora&e orfugitive emissions point, (D) are desip. equipment, work practice, or operational standards (includmg requirements for operator training or certification) as provided insubsection(h) ofthis section, or 3

# c ExhibitNMED 13 Selected ProvisionsofCAA 

### §§ 111 & 112 (E) are a combination ofthe above. None of the measures described in subparagraphs (A) through (D) sball, consiatent with the provisions ofsection 7414(c} of thia title. in any way compromise any United States patent or United States trademark right. or any confidentialbusiness information, or any tradesecretoranyotherintellectual propertyright. 

## • • 

# • • (I) Stateprocnms (1) ID 1eneral

Each State may develop and submit to the Adminutrator- for approval a program for the unplementauon and enforcement (including a review ofenforcement delegattons prev1ously granted) ofemission standards and other requirements for air pollutant& subject to this section or requirements for the prevention and mitigation of accidental releases pursuant to subsection (r) ofthis section. A program submitted by a State under this subsection may provide for partial or complete delegahOn of the Administnttor's authorities and responsibilities to implement and enforce enussions standards and prevention requtrements but shall not include authonty to set standards less stnngent than those promulgated by the Administratorunder tluschapter
.

4

## (



# ( STATE OFNEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENTBOARD IN THEMATTEROFPROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO AIR QUALITYREGULATIONS 20.1.77 AND 20.2.82 NMAC No. 

## Em No. 13-07 (R)



### ORDER AND STATEMENT OFREASONS FORREGULATORY CHANGES
This mattercomes before the 

### NewMexico Environmental ImprovementBoard (''Board'') upon apetition filed by theNewMexico Environment Department ("NMED" or "Department'), proposing revisions to 20.2.7711!1d 20.2.82 NMAC. The Board heard

### testimony 

### from the Departmentand admittedexhibits into the record. OnNovember7, 2013, the Boarddeliberated ll!1d 

### voted to adoptthe proposed amendments forthe 

### reasons thatfollow:

I. 

### STATEMENT OFREASONS The federal Clean Air 

### Act ("CAA") requims the 

### U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA'') to promulgate standards 

### ofperformance for 

### new stationary sources. CAA 

### § Ill (42 U.S.C. § 

### 7411). Regulations promulgated under 

### this authority are 

### known as 

### New Source Performance Standards ("NSPS'') ll!1d are 

### containedin

### 40 C.P.R. Part

### 60. 2. CAA § 

### Jll(c)provides for delegation to states ofthe authority to implementand enforce the 

### standard promulgated under Section Ill. 42 U.S.C. § 

### 7411(c). 3. CAA § 

### 112 requires the EPA to promulgate regulations governing hazardous air 

### pollutants. 42 U.S.C. § 

### 7412. Regulations promulgated under this section are 

### known as 

### National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants ("NESHAP''), contained in 40 C.F.R. 

### Part 61; 

### ll!1d Maximum 

### Achievable Control Technology "(MACT") 

### standards 

### for hazardous air

### pollutants, contained in 40 C.F.R. Part 63. Exh. NMED 14- Proposed StatementofReasons and Order Page I ofS 

# Exh. NMED 14

### 4. CAA § 112 (1)(1) provides for delegation to 

### states ofauthority to 

### implement and enforce 

### standards promulgated under Section 112. 42 

### U.S.C.§ 7412(1)(1). 

### 5. In 

### 1985, the EPA approved delegation ofauthority to New Mexico to implement and enforce the NSPS andNESHAP. See ExhibitNMED 7. 6. In 

### 1995, the EPA approved delegation of authority to New Mexico to implement and enforce the MACT standards. See Exhibit NMED 8. 7. New Mexico 

### incorporates the federal 

### standards contained 

### in 40 C.F.R Parts 60 and 63 into 

### the New Mexico Administrative Code ("NMACj at 20.2.77 and 20.2.82 NMAC, respectively. 8. The New Mexico Environment Department ("NMED") periodically petitions the Board to 

### update the dates of incorporation ofthe federal standards 

### in 

### 20.2.77, and 20.2.82 NMAC, in 

### order to incorporate recently promulgated revisions to the federal standards. See ExhibitNMED 3, Test. ofLany Weaver, at 2. 9. 

### Pursuant to 

### 20.1.300.A NMAC, any person may petition the Board 

### for amendment of regulations within thejurisdiction ofthe Board. 10. On

### June 24, 2013, 

### NMED filed a petition with the Board

### for apublic hearing in

### this matter. See petition in 

### Record Proper. 11. On 

### July 15, 2013, at 

### ameeting conducted in

### compliance with the OpenMeetings Act and other applicable requirements, the Board granted the Depaz1ment's request 

### for ahearing. 12. On 

### August 30, 2013, Notice ofHearing 

### was published in the New Mexico Register. See NMED Exhibit 9a. 13. On

### August 28, 2013, Notice ofHearing 

### was published in the Albuquerque Joumal (in 

### English and Spanish).**~**

### NMED Exhibit9b. Exh. NMED 14- Proposed StatementofReasons and Order Page2of5 

### (

### (



# (

' '

### '· 14. NMED filed a Notice ofIntentto PresentTechnical Testimony (''NOI") on October 18, 2013, in accordance with 20.1.1.302 NMAC. 15. A hearing was held in this matteron November 7, 2013, in SantaFe, NewMexico. 16. The Board has 

### the authority to approve these proposed amendments pursuant to NMSA 1978, 

### § 74-2-S.C. 17. The standards adopted by this regulatory change are federal standards, and therefore by definition are no more stringent but at least as stringent as the federal standards, in compliance with NMSA 1978, 

### § 74-2-S.C (2). 18. In considering the proposed SIP revisions, the Board is required by the 

### Air Quality Control Act, NMSA 1978, 

### § 74-2-S.E to give the weight it deems appropriate to all facts and circumstances, including but not limited to (I) 

### character 

### and degree ofinjury to or interference with health, welfare, visibility and property; 

### (2) the public interest, including the social and economic value ofthe sources and subjects of air contaminants; and (3) technical practicability and economic reasonableness of reducing or eliminating air contaminants from the sources involved and previous experience with equipment 

### and methods available to control the aircontaminants involved. 19. The federal NSPS are established by 

### the EPA based on the best system of emission reductions which have been adequately demonstrated, taking into account the costs of achieving 

### such reductions and any nonair quality health 

### and environmental impact and energy requirements. 42 U.S.C. 

### § 74ll(aXl). 20. The federal MACT are established by the EPA for categories and subcategories of

sources of emissions of hazardous air pollutants, based on the maximum degree of reduction of emissions achievable, taking into consideration the cost of achieving the Exh. NMED 14- Proposed Statement ofReasons and Order Page 3 ofS

### reductions, any nonair quality health and environmental 

### impacts and energy requirements. 42 U.S.C. § 

### 7412(d)(2). 21. EPA's determination ofNSPS and MACT 

### standards therefore considers the character

### and degree ofinjury to or interference with health, and welfare; the public interest, including the social and 

### economic value ofthe sources and subjects ofair contaminants; and the technical practicability and economic reasonableness of reducing or eliminating air 

### contaminants from the sources involved. 22. Incorporation by reference ofthe federal standards 

### into the New Mexico Administrative Code docs not change the substantive standards 

### applicable to 

### affected sources in New Mexico because the EPA 

### retains authority 

### for direct enforcement of the regulations. See 

### Exhibit NMED 3, Test. of Lany Weaver, at 1. Accordingly, this rulemaking will not result inany increase 

### in economic hardship for sources orany increase in air contaminant emissions, but will increase the efficiency ofimplementation ofthe regulations. See /d 

### at 2. This servesthepublic interest. 23. The proposed amendments therefore satisfy the 

### statutory requirements ofthe Air Quality 

### Control Act, NMSA 1978, § 

### 74·2-S.E. 24. The notice and hearing requirements ofNMSA 1978 Section 74-2-6 and 20.1.1 NMAC
were satisfied in

### this ruleroaking process. 25. The proposed amendments are adopted for any or all ofthe reasons stated above. 

### ORDER By vote ofa quorum ofthe Boardmembers, the proposed regulatory revisions were approved by 

### the Board on November7, 2013. Amendments to 20.2.77 and 20.2.82 NMAC, with any appropriate corrections oftypographical errors, orformatting shall be 

### Exh. NMED 14

- Proposed StarcmentofReasons and Order Page 4 of5 

## (

## (



# (

( filed with the New Mexico State 

### Records Center, and shall be submitted as expeditiously as possible by the Department to 

### the EPA for approval ofdelegation authority.

On Behalfofthe Board

Exh. NMED 14- Proposed Statement ofReasons and Order PageS ofS 

### Dated:---------

# /~~ /

# ~'"">c~t, I

. 

# I f 

# \

\

### (



# (

( SUSANAloiAilTIHEZ Govomor JOliN A. SA!'ICHEZ U...tenantGovomO<



### October 17, 2013 

### NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT 

## Officeof GeneralCotmsel Raroklltulwla Bulkling 1190 SAintfrMCia Dr., Sll!lla Fe, NM 87SOS

PO Baa: 5469, SantaFo.NM 87502·5469 Phone (505) 827-2855 Fax (50S) 827·2836 WW\V.nmenv.auate.mn.us



### New Mexico Eeonomie DevelopmentDepartment Small Business Regulatory Advisory Commission 1100 St. Francis 

### Drive SantaFe, New Mexico 87501 Via U.S Postal Service & 

### E-Mail R.YANFLYNN Cabioet Semlar)I-DesiJ1141C tun:HTONOAlE 

### o.,..ry S........wcy



### Re: Proposed Amendments to Air Quality Regulations 20.2.77 and 20.2.82NMAC;
DearChainnan and 

### Members ofthe Small Business RegulatoryAdvisory Commission: This

### Jetteris

### to provide you with noticeofanupcoming hearing 

### in

### the above captioned matter. 

### Itinvolves updates to the**incorpon~lion** 

### by

### reference offederal 

### New Source Performance Standards, and 

### Maximum Achievable Control Technology standards. The Air

### QuslityBureau does not believe that

### theproposed revisions will have an adverse effecton small businesses. Underthe federal Clean Air

### Act, Sections 111 and 112, the

### U.S. EPA retains the authorityto enforce these standards regardless ofwhether a state chooses to implemeltt them. Therefore adoption ofthese standards 

### as stateregulations docs not add 

### to the regulatoryburdenofindustry, but rather enables the 

### state to assumetheprimary rolein implementingthe standards. The

### hearings in 

### this matter

### will beheld at the regularly scheduled meetingofthe Environmental Improvement Board on November7, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. inRoom 311 at the StateCapital in 

### Santa 

### Fe, New Mexico. More infomutt:ion on

### the proposed

### revisions maybefoll!ld 

### at: http;//www.runeny.stnte.nm.us/agb/pmp regs.htm!. Please feel free to contactme with any 

### questions. Sincerely,**~:::;:>_.-.;!;** 

### s Bill Grantham Assistant General Counsel


## Exh. NMED 16

### STATE OFNEW :MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVE:MENT BOARD IN THE

### MATTER OFPROPOSED A:MEND:MENTS TO AIR QUAIJTY 

### REGULATIONS 20.2.77 AND20.2.82NMAC No. 

## Em No. 

### 13-07 (R)



### ORDER AND STATE:MENT OF REASONS FOR REGULATORY CHANGES
This matter comes before the New Mexico Envirorunentallrnprovement Board ("Board") upon a petitionfiled by the NewMexico EnvirorunentDepartment ("NMED" or"Department"), proposingrevisions to 20.2.77 and 20.2.82 NMAC. TheBoard heard testimony from the Department and admitted exhibits into the record. OnNovember7, 2013, the Board deliberated and voted to adopt the proposed amendments forthe reasons that follow: 

### STATE:MENT OFREASONS L The federal Clean Air Act ("CAA'') requires the U.S. Envirorunental Protection Agency ("EPA") topromulgate standards ofperformance for new stationary sources. CAA § 

### 111 (42 U.S.C. § 

### 7411). Regulations promulgated under this authority 

### are known 

### as New Source Performance Standards ("NSPS") and 

### are contained in

### 40 C.F.R. Part 60. 2. CAA § Ill( 

### c)provides for delegation to states ofthe authority to implement andenforce the standard promulgatedunder Section 111. 42 U.S.C. § 

### 7411(c). 3. CAA § 

### 112 requires the EPA to promulgate regulations governing hazardous air pollutants. 42 U.S.C. § 

### 7412. Regulations promulgated under this section are known 

### as National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants ("NESHAP"), 

### contained in 40 C.F.R. Part 61; and 

### Maximum Achievable Control Technology "(MACT") 

### standards for hazardous airpollutants, contained in

### 40 C.F.R. Part 63. Exh. NMED 14- Statement ofReasons and Order Page 1 

### of5

### 4. CAA § 

### 112 (1)(1) provides for delegation to states ofauthority to implement and enforce standards promulgated under Section 112. 42 U.S.C. § 

### 7412(1)(1). 5. ln 

### 1985, the EPA approved delegation of authority to New Mexico to implement and enforcethe NSPS and NESHAP. See 

### Exhibit NMED 7. 6. ln 

### 1995, the EPA approved delegation of authority to New Mexico to implement and enforce the MACT standards. See 

### Exhibit NMED 8. 7. New Mexico incorporates the federal standards contained in 40 C.F.R Parts 60 and 63 into the New Mexico Administrative Code ("NMAC") at 20.2.77 and 20.2.82 NMAC, respectively. 8. The New Mexico Environment Department ("NMED") periodically petitions the Board to update the dates of incorporation of the federal standards in 20.2.77, and 20.2.82 NMAC, in order to 

### incorporate recently promulgated revisions to the federal standards. See 

### Exhibit NMED 3, Test. ofLany Weaver, at 2. 9. Pursuant to 20.1.300.A NMAC, any person may petition the Board for amendment of regulations within thejurisdiction ofthe Board. 10. OnJune 24, 2013, NMED filed a petition with the Board for a public hearing in this matter. See 

### petition in Record Proper. 11. OnJuly 15, 2013, at ameeting conducted in compliance with the Open Meetings Act and other applicable requirements, the Board granted the Department's request for ahearing. 12. On August 30, 2013, Notice ofHearing was published in the New Mexico Register. See NMED Exhibit 9a. 13. On August 28, 2013, Notice ofHearing was published in the Albuquerque Journal (in English and Spanish). See NMED Exhibit 9b. Exh. NMED 14

- Statement ofReasons and Order Page2 of5

### 14. NMED filed a Notice ofIntent to PresentTechnical Testimony ("NOr') on October 18, 2013, in accordance with 20.1.1.302 NMAC. 15. A hearing was held in this matter onNovember 7, 2013, inSanta Fe, New Mexico. 16. The Board has the authority to approve these proposed amendments pursuant to NMSA 1978, § 

### 74-2-S.C. 17. The standards adopted by this regulatory change are federal standards, and therefore by defmition are no more stringent but at least as stringent as the federal standards, in compliance with NMSA 1978, 

### §74-2-S.C (2). 18. The proposed revisions satisfy the requirements ofthe Air Quality Control Act, NMSA 1978, 

### § 74-2-S.E in that the Board has given the weight it deems appropriate to all facts and circumstances, including but not limited to (1) character and degree of injury to or interference with health, welfare, visibility and property; (2) the public interest, including the social and economic value of the sources and subjects of air contaminants; and (3) technical practicability and economic reasonableness of reducing or eliminating air contaminants from the sources involved and previous experience with equipment and methods availableto control the air contaminants involved. 19. The federal NSPS are established by the EPA based on the best system of emission reductions which have been adequately demonstrated, taking into account the costs of achieving such reductions and any nonair quality health and environmental impact and energy requirements. 42 U.S.C. § 

### 74ll(a)(l). 20. The federal MACT standards are established by the EPA for categories and subcategories of sources of emissions of hazardous air 

### pollutants, based on the maximum degree of reduction of emissions achievable, taking into consideration the cost of achieving the Exh. NMED 14

- Statement ofReasons and Order Page3 of5

### reductions, any nonair quality health and environmental impacts and energy requirements. 42U.S.C. 

### §7412(d)(2). 21. EPA's determination ofNSPS and MACT standards therefore considers the character and degree ofinjury to or interference with health, and welfare; the public interest, including the social and economic value of the sources and subjects of air contaminants; 

### and the technical practicability and economic reasonableness of reducing or eliminating air contaminants from the sources involved. 22. Incorporation by reference of the federal standards into the New Mexico Administrative Code does not change the substantive standards applicable to affected sources in New Mexico because the EPA retains authority for direct enforcement ofthe regulations. See 42 U.S.C. § 

### 74ll(c)(2) 

### and 42 U.S.C. 

### § 7412(1)(7). Accordingly, this rulemaldng will not result in any substantial increase in economic hardship for sources or any increase in air contaminant emissions, but will increase the efficiency of implementation of the regulations. See 

### ld. at2. 23. The Department testified regarding its plan to implement the proposed amendments in a careful, efficient, and conservative manner, specifically as it relates to the 0000 standards to petroleum storage tanks and the oil and gas industry. It specifically referred to its plan to utilize the thresholds set forth in the general construction contract to assist industry in easily complying with such rules. For this reason the Board determined that the proposed amendments do not substantially impact the State of New Mexico's economy or are unduly burdensome for industry. In addition, efficient and conservative implementation ofthe standards bytheDepartment serves thepublic interest.

Exh. NMED 14- StatementofReasons 

### and Order Page4 ofS24. In addition 

### toEPA's own determination, based ontheevidence set forth above, the Board has independently determined that the proposed amendments therefore satisfy the statutoryrequirements ofthe Air QualityConrrol Act, NMSA 1978, 

### § 74-2-S.E. 25. The notice and hearing requirements of NMSA 1978 Section 74-2-6 and 20.1.1 NMAC

were satisfied in this rulemaking process. 

### 26. Theproposed amendments are adopted for any or all ofthereasons stated above. 

### ORDER By a unanimous vote ofa quorum ofthe Board members, theproposed regulatory revisions were approvedbythe Board onNovember 7, 2013. Amendments to 20.2.77 and 20.2.82 NMAC, with any appropriate corrections oftypographical errors, orformatting shall be filed with the New Mexico State Records Center, and shall be submitted as expeditiously as possible bytheDepartment to theEPA for approval ofdelegation authority.

# ~ o.oo,

# """'---+P-f---+-'-..~fi3,}--- Deb011ll1APeaCO OnBehalfofthe Board



### Exh. NMED 

### 14- Statement ofReasons and Order Page 

### 5of51 2 

### 3 

### STATE OF NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD
No. EIB 13-07(R) 4 IN THE MATTER OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO AIR QUALITY REGULATIONS 5 20.2.77 AND 20.2.82 NMAC 6 7 8 9 

### 10 11 

### 12 13 14 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS 15 16 BE IT REMEMBERED that on the 7th day of 17 November, 2013, the above-entitled matter came on for 18 hearing before the New Mexico Environmental Improvement 19 Board, taken at the State Capitol Building, Room 311, 20 Santa Fe, New Mexico, at the hour of 10:35 a.m. 21 22 

### 23 24 25 KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606 

### 1

### 1 APPEARANCES 2 For the Environmental Improvement Board: 3 DEBORAH PEACOCK GREGORY H. FULFER 

### 4 JOHN MICHAEL VOLKERDING TIMOTHY L. MORROW 5 ELIZABETH RYAN MATTHEW HOLT 6 

### ABBY LEWIS 7 Assistant Attorney General Civil Division 8 

### Office of the Attorney General Post Office Drawer 1508 9 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504-1508 (505) 827-6921 10 alewis@nmag.gov 11 For the New Mexico Environment Department: 12 BILL GRANTHAM Assistant General Counsel 13 Office of General Counsel 

### 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 

### 22 23 24 

### 25 

### New Mexico Environment Department 1190 St. Francis Drive Suite N-4068 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505 (505} 222-9594 bill.grantham@state.nm.us

KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twe:fth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 {505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606 

### 21 I N D E X 2 PAGE 

### 3 WITNESSES: 4 LANY WEAVER and RITA BATES 5 Direct Examination of Lany Weaver 

### 6 by Mr. Grantham 8 7 Direct Examination of Rita Bates 8 by Mr. Grantham 19 9 Examination by the Board 

### 21 10 11 

### 12 13 14 15 16 

### 17 18 19 

### 20 

### 21 22 23 24 25 KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606 

### 3

### 1 E X H I B I T S 2 

### ADMITTED 3 NMED: 4 5 6 7 8 9 

### 10 11 

### 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 

### 21 22 

### 23 24 25 1. 2 . 3 . 4.

5 . 6.



### 7 .

8 .

9a.



### 9b.

10.

11. Resume of Lany Weaver Resume of Rita Bates Written Testimony of Lany Weaver Proposed revised amendments to 20.2.77 NMAC Proposed amendments to 20.2.82 NMAC List of Amendments to 40 CFR 60 and 63 Published int he Federal Register from January 1 2011 to August 29, 2013 and September 23, 2013 Environmental Protection Agency Letter, March 15, 1985 Environmental Protection Agency Letter, July 27, 1985 Affidavit of Publication in the New Mexico Register Ad Proof/Order Confirmation for the Albuquerque Journal New Mexico Environment Department letter, July 1, 2013 Lany Weaver E-mail, September 23, 2013

KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 20 20 20

20 

### 20

20

20

20

20



### 20

20 20



### 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606 

### 4

### 1 E X H I B I T S (Continued) 

### 2 ADMITTED 3 

### Nt1ED (Continued): 

### 4 12. Environmental Protection Agency 5 

### Memorandum, August 

### 30, 2013 20 6 13. Excerpts from 42 USCA Section 7411 7 

### and 7412 20 8 

### 14. Order and Statement of Reasons for 9 

### Regulatory Changes 20 

### 10 15. CD containing Federal Register notices 

### 20 11 16. New Mexico Environment Department letter, 12 October 

### 17, 2013 20 13 14 15 

### 16 17 18 

### 19 20 21 22 

### 23 24 25 

### KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 

### Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- 

### Fax (505) 243-3606 

### 5

### 1 MS. PEACOCK: We'll move on to item number 7, 2 

### which is hearing and possible deliberations in EIB 3 13-07, proposed amendments to air quality regulations 

### 4 20.2.77 and 20.2.82, Mr. Grantham. 5 And I'll turn this over to our Hearing 6 

### Officer, Vice-Chair Volkerding. 7 

### MR. VOLKERDING: Okay. 8 

### My name is John Volkerding. I was designated 9 by the Environmental Improvement Board to act as Hearing 10 Officer in this rnat ter. 11 This hearing is being held to consider 12 amendments to air quality control regulations 20.2.77 13 and 20.2.82 NMAC. The rulemaking petition was filed by 14 

### the Environment Department and docketed by the 15 

### administrator as EIB 13-07 

### (R). 16 The hearing will be conducted in accordance 17 with the Board's rulemaking procedures set out in 20.1.1 18 

### NMAC. I 

### will conduct the hearing so as to provide 19 

### reasonable opportunity for all persons to be heard. 20 The Rules of Civil Procedure and Rules of 21 Evidence do not apply, but I'll make whatever orders are 22 necessary to preserve decorum. 23 All testimony will be taken under oath, and 24 

### all persons giving testimony will be subject to 25 

### cross-examination by any other person in attendance on KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-50l8

- 

### Fax (505) 

### 243-3606 

### 6

### 1 the subject matter of their testimony and on matters 2 affecting their credibility. 3 

### The hearing is being recorded and transcribed 

### 4 by Cheryl Arreguin of Kathy Townsend Court Reporters. 

### A 5 

### copy of the transcript may be obtained directly from the 6 court reporter, and it also does become a public record, 7 viewable in the office of the Board administrator. 8 

### If you have not signed in, please do so. 9 

### If you have a phone or pager, please silence 10 it. 11 Board members, the file contains the petition 12 

### for hearing and the Department's notice of intent to 13 

### present technical testimony. 14 

### No other parties have filed motions. 15 

### There will be an opportunity for public 16 

### comment. 17 Mr. Grantham, if you'd like to make your 18 

### appearance and introduce your witnesses. 19 MR. GRANTHAM: Good morning, Mr. Hearing 20 Officer, Madam Chair, members of the Board, Counsel. 21 My name is Bill Grantham, and I represent the 22 New Mexico Environment Department. 23 

### And with me today from the Air Quality Bureau 24 

### are Ms. Lany Weaver and Ms. Rita Bates. And similar to 25 

### the last hearing, we only have direct questions KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- 

### Fax (505) 243-3606 

### 71 direct testimony for Ms. Weaver, and Ms. Bates is here 2 to answer any questions from the Board. 3 Thank you. 4 5 MR. VOLKERDING: Thank you. So if you'd like to have your witnesses sworn 6 in, please. 7 8 9 10 11 LANY WEAVER and RITA BATES having been first duly sworn or affirmed, were examined and testified as follows: MR. VOLKERDING: Go ahead, Mr. Grantham. MR. GRANTHAM: Thank you. 12 DIRECT EXAMINATION OF LANY WEAVER 13 BY MR. GRANTHAM: 14 Q. Ms. Weaver, please state your name for the 15 record. 16 17 18 A. Q. A. Lany Weaver. And where do you work? The Environment Department, Environmental 19 Protection Division, Air Quality Bureau. 20 Q. And how long have you been with the Air 21 Quality Bureau? 22 A. Twenty-three years. 23 Q. Can you briefly describe your relevant 24 educational background. 25 A. Bachelor of science in mechanical engineering KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606 

### 8

### 1 at the University of California, Davis. 2 

### Q. And is a copy of your resume included in the 3 notice of intent that was filed in this case? 4 A. 

### Yes. 5 Q. 

### And is that NMED Exhibit 1? 6 A. 

### Yes. 7 

### Q. And can you briefly describe your duties at 8 the Air Quality Bureau. 9 A. 

### To develop and review State Implementation 10 Plans and regulatory language and conduct public 11 outreach. 12 Q. 

### And did you develop the proposed regulatory 13 changes that are the subject of this hearing? 14 A. 

### Yes. 15 Q. 

### And did you provide written testimony for this 16 hearing? 17 A. 

### Yes. It's

-- it is at NMED Exhibit Number 3. 18 Q. 

### And do you adopt that written testimony as 19 your testimony today here under oath? 20 A. Yes. 21 Q. 

### Can you please describe the objective of 22 NMED's proposal. 23 A. 

### Well, under the federal Clean Air Act, the 24 authority to implement and enforce specific federal air 25 quality regulations may be delegated to the states. KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606 

### 9

### 10 1 That language in the Clean Air Act is included as 2 Exhibit 13. 3 New Mexico has previously sought and obtained 4 implementation authority for air quality standards under 5 the Clean Air Act and periodically requests that the 6 Board update the date

-- the state rules by which we 7 take delegation of the federal standards. 8 And the proposed regulatory revisions would 9 allow NMED to take delegation of new rules and 10 amendments made to federal regulations during the period 11 of January 1, 2011, to September 23rd, 2013. 12 Q. And as a general background matter, why does 13 the state take delegation of federal rules? 14 A. 

### The implementation of rules by the Department 15 is more efficient and more effective than reliance on 16 the federal implementation. EPA retains oversight 17 authority through Region 6, the Dallas offices, but they 18 don't have the staff or the resources to perform 19 day-to-day implementation. 20 On the other hand, the Department is well 21 positioned to determine which standards are applicable 22 to sources and to determine source compliance through 23 our inspection program and our permit program. 24 And generally, both EPA and the regulated 25 community prefer that the Department implement and KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606

### 11 1 enforce the air quality regulations rather than EPA. 

### 2 Q. And does taking delegation of federal rules 

### 3 either increase the regulatory burden on facilities or 4 

### result in increased emissions of air pollutants? 5 A. 

### No. Taking delegation of the existing federal 

### 6 rules does not alter the requirements of the federal 

### 7 rules, and as a result, this rulemaking will not result 

### 8 in any increase in economic hardship for sources or any 9 

### increase in air contaminant emissions. 10 

### Q. Moving on to the particular regulations at 11 issue today, can you please describe the NMAC parts that 12 are proposed for revision. 13 A. 

### Well, there are two, 20.2.77 NMAC and 20.2.82 14 NMAC, referred to as Parts 77 and 82. 15 The similarities between the regulations are 16 that each provides a vehicle by which the state takes 17 delegation for a very specific portion of the federal 18 rules under the Clean Air Act and that are codified in 19 Chapter 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, or 40 20 CFR. 21 And to accomplish this, each rule states that 22 the relevant federal rules as promulgated by the USEPA 23 and amended in the Federal Register through a specified 24 date are hereby incorporated into this part. 25 And each rule sets out exceptions in its KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505)**2~3-3606**

### 12 1 Section 10, which are federal

-- which are the federal 2 rules that are not incorporated by reference, and these 3 exceptions are not being amended at this time. 4 

### Specific to Part 77, its title is New Source 5 6 

### Performance Standards, which is referred to as NSPS. It
was first adopted in 1995. We had the statutory 7 authority to delegate it under the Clean Air Act 8 Section 111 (c). 9 It incorporates by reference the federal 10 standards in 40 CFR Part 60. The sections that are to 11 be amended are 2 and 9, and their proposed through date 12 is September 23rd, 2013. 13 The exhibit number is the proposed rule

-- of 14 the proposed rule is NMED 4, and the exhibit number for 15 the initial EPA delegation agreement is Exhibit 7. 16 The other regulation, Part 82, is titled 17 Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards for 18 Source Categories of Hazardous Air Pollutants. 19 I'm not sure that that's correct. 20 Could you look at the rule? 21 It's referred to as the MACT standards, but 22 23 

### 24 25 that might be 78. I don't want to be incorrect there. MS. BATES: No. That's correct. MS. WEAVER: That's correct. MS. BATES: Yes. KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-36061 

### MS. WEAVER: Okay. Thank you. 2 It was first adopted in 1998. The statutory 3 authority to delegate is 111

-- excuse me 112 (1) (7) 4 

### of the Clean Air Act. It incorporates by reference 40 5 

### CFR Part 63. The sections to be amended are 2 and 

### B. 6 The through date is August 29th, 2013. 7 

### The exhibit number is 5 for the rule, and for 8 the initial EPA delegation agreement, it's Exhibit 8. 9 

### And we have other rules that by which the 10 state accepts delegation of federal rules, but they are 11 not being proposed for revision at this time. 12 13 Q. MR. GRANTHAM: Thank you. With respect to the federal rules at issue, 14 can you describe specifically what federal regulations 15 would be incorporated if the Board amends the dates of 

### 13

16 incorporation in the NMAC sections as the Department has 17 requested. 18 A. 

### Yes. As mentioned previously, Parts 77 and 82 19 each states that the relevant federal rules as 20 promulgated by the EPA and amended in the Federal 21 Register through specified date are incorporated. The 22 Federal Register notices are formal announcements of new 23 or revised regulations, including the NSPS and MACT 24 standards. 25 NMED Exhibit 6 is a list of the notices that KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606

### 14 1 announced the amendments that are being incorporated 2 into this proposal, and that's a table that includes the 3 digital file name used in Exhibit 15, the date of 4 publication in the Federal Register, and the parts of 40 5 CFR that are amended, which could be Part 60 or 63 or 6 both, as well as the title of that notice. 7 

### The full text of the Federal Register notices 8 are included on the CD that is NMED Exhibit 15, and if 9 printed, those notices would total over 1, 600 pages, and 10 that's why we've given it to you on a CD. 11 The file name for each rule corresponds with 12 the file name listed in NMED Exhibit 6. 13 Q. 

### And is the Department proposing any revisions 14 to the proposed regulatory changes as compared to the 15 versions that were contained in the petition for the 16 hearing

-- for this hearing? 17 A. 

### Yes. We're asking that the through date in 18 Part 77, which was originally proposed to be 19 August 29th, 2013, as in the other rule, be amended to 20 September 23rd, 2013. 21 The amended only incorporates one additional 22 federal rulemaking, which is

-- which are amendments to 23 NSPS, which is 40 CFR Part 16 Subpart 0000, 

### which is 24 referred to as quad 0. 

### No other NSPS were published in 25 the Federal Register between August 29th and KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606

### 15 1 September 23rd. 2 It's necessary for NMED to take delegation of 3 

### the most recent version of quad 0. Because it relates 4 to oil and gas, the NSPS quad 0 

### is of particular 5 interest to New Mexico, and to have delegation of an 6 outdated version could compromise our ability to 7 implement it and also create confusion. 8 From our first notification regarding this 9 rulemaking, NMED has stated our intention to take 10 delegation of the amendments of NSPS quad 0. 

### And that ll was in a stakeholder letter July lst, 2013, we stated 12 that intention. And that letter is NMED Exhibit 10. 13 And with respect to Part

-- Part 82, no 14 changes from the petition version are proposed. 15 Q. 

### Then were interested parties given notice of 16 the revision to the date of incorporation with respect 17 to Part 77 which you just described? 18 A. 

### Yes. On the day that quad 0 

### amendments were 19 published in the Federal Register, we sent an E-mail to 20 stakeholders informing them of our intention to amend 21 the date in Part 77 to September 23rd, 2013, and we -- 22 we explained why. 23 And that is in NMED Exhibit 11, which includes 24 also another E-mail sent the next day correcting I 25 mistakenly gave the wrong date for the hearing. So I KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606

### 16 1 corrected that the next day. 2 The stakeholder list includes facility owners, 3 industry organizations, public interest groups and 4 anyone that's expressed an interest. 5 The stakeholders have had adequate opportunity 6 also to review the

-- the new changes to the NSPS quad 0 7 that we're asking to be incorporated, and that's because 8 the original

-- well, the original through date of 9 August 29th, 2013, was chosen to allow stakeholders at 10 least 60 days prior to the hearing to review the rules 11 that were incorporated by reference. 12 Quad

-- NSPS quad 0 

### was finalized and 13 immediately released to the public before that on 14 August 6, 2013, but unfortunately, they had some 15 nonsubstantive errors in what they finalized, and on 16 August 30th EPA issued a memo of

-- on inadvertent 17 errors that outlined those errors in the finalized rule. 18 We've included that as Exhibit 12. 19 And the correction of these errors did not 20 change the substance of the rule. But as a result of 21 having to correct those inadvertent mistakes, the 22 publication of quad 0 

### in the Federal Register was 23 delayed until September 23rd, 2013, and although the 24 rule itself was available long before. 25 The public has, as a result, had access to the KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606

### 1 rule in its final form for far more than 60 days prior 2 to today. 3 

### We believe this amended proposal is 4 appropriate because the finalized part 0 has been 5 available throughout the public comment period and no 6 substantive changes were made between finalization and 

### 17

7 

### publication. Stakeholders have had adequate opportunity 8 to review NSPS subpart quad 0, 

### and also, we have 9 received no comments on the proposal or the amendment 10 that would include quad 0, 

### and there have been no 11 objections from any of our stakeholders. 12 13 Q. 

### Okay. Thank you. And are you familiar with provisions in the 14 Air Quality Control Act at 74-2-5.E, which require the 15 Board to take certain factors under consideration when 16 adopting regulations? 17 

### A. Yes. They include the character and degree 18 of

-- excuse me -- the character and degree of injury to 19 or interference with health and welfare, the public 20 interest including the social and economic value of the 21 sources and subjects of air contaminants, and the 22 technical practicability and economic reasonableness of 23 reducing or eliminating air contaminants from the 24 sources involved. 25 Q. 

### And in your opinion, does the proposed KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606

### 18 1 adoption by reference of the recent NSPS and MACTs 2 satisfy those statutory factors? 3 

### A. Yes. There will be no change in requirements 4 that apply to facilities in New Mexico or any increase 5 in emissions as a result of this regulatory amendment. 6 And as a result, there will be no injury or interference 7 to public health, welfare, public interest or the 8 economy. 9 Q. And to your knowledge, is EPA required to 10 consider similar factors when developing the NSPS and 11 the MACTs in the first place? 12 A. Yes. When developed, the federal regulations, 13 the state
-- there are federal regulations that state 14 that when the EPA is proposing laws, that they take into 15 consideration the best system of emissions reductions 16 which have been adequately demonstrated, taking into 17 account the costs of achieving such reductions and any 18 nonair quality

-- nonair quality health and 19 environmental impact and energy requirements. 20 So they are required-- they're under similar 21 requirements. 22 Q. Okay. Thank you. 23 Did the Department provide public notice of 24 this hearing? 25 A. Yes. The EIB's rulemaking regulations require KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606

### 19 1 that the notice of this hearing be published in a 2 newspaper of general circulation and the New Mexico 3 

### Register. The notice was published in English and 4 Spanish in the Albuquerque Journal on August 28th, 2013, 5 and in the New Mexico Register on August 30th, 2013. 6 And it's been posted on the NMED Air Quality Bureau web 7 site since August 12th, 2013. 8 

### The notices are also contained in Exhibits 9a 9 

### and 9b. And as described above, we also provided 10 E-mails to stakeholders, and we have no comments 11 whatsoever. 12 Q. 

### So in conclusion, does the Department 13 recommend the amendments to Part 77 and Part 82? 14 A. 

### Yes. The Department believes that it would be 15 most beneficial to the state to take delegation of the 16 recent federal rules under 40 CFR Part 60 and 63, and 17 this is accomplished through the proposed regulations 18 amendments to Part 77 and Part 82. 19 Q. 

### Thank you. 20 I have no further questions of Ms. Weaver. 21 I 

### will ask just a question to establish the 22 record for Ms. Bates. 23 DIRECT EXAMINATION OF RITA BATES 24 BY MR. GRANTHAM: 25 Q. 

### Can you please state your name for the record. KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-36061 A. 

### Rita Bates. 2 Q. 

### And was your resume submitted as part of the 3 notice of intent to present technical testimony? 4 5 6 7 8 9 A. Q. A. Q. 

### Yes, it was. And is that at NMED Exhibit 2? Yes. Thank you. I have no further questions. At this point, I would move for admission of 10 Exhibits NMED 1 through 13 and 15, and I would also add

### 20

11 at this point that Exhibit 14 is a proposed statement of 12 reasons which has been included in the NOI as provided 13 by-- in 20.1.1, and NMED Exhibit 16 is a letter to the 14 Small Business Regulatory Advisory Commission that I 15 sent as -- just to alert them of this

-- the occurrence 16 of this hearing, even though it's the opinion of the 17 Department, the determination of the Department that 18 this will have no impact on -- adverse impact on small 19 businesses. 20 So with that, I would move for the admission 21 of NMED Exhibits 1 through 16. 22 

### 23 24 25 MR. VOLKERDING: Okay. They're admitted. Thank you. (Exhibits NMED 1 through 16 admitted into evidence.) KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606

### 21
MR. GRANTHAM: Thank you. We stand for cross-examination. 

### 1 2 3 

### MR. VOLKERDING: Questions from members of the 4 Board? 5 

### EXAMINATION 6 

### BY THE BOARD: 7 

### MR. VOLKERDING: Mr. Fulfer. 8 

### MR. FULFER: On your Exhibit 10, I'm a little 9 confused in the

-- on where you're taking delegation or 10 taking an alternative approach. 

### 11 Can you explain that just a little bit more? 12 13 MS. WEAVER: MR. FULFER: I'm sorry. What

-- It's the second paragraph from 14 the

-- from the end of that Exhibit 10. 15 MS. WEAVER: Second from the end? 16 MR. FULFER: That's the best way I've got to 17 describe it. 18 19 MS. WEAVER: Oh. In the rule, it allows us to make exceptions, so we could

-- could have said we we 20 take delegation of all of the federal rules for a 21 certain period of time except specific ones. And 22 historically we have chosen specific ones that we have 23 not taken delegation of because we thought that would be 24 better taken by the

-- administered by the EPA, like the 25 radionuclides, NESHAP. KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-36061 2 

### MR. FULFER: MS. WEAVER: So

-- There are some that we haven't. 3 And so when we first sent out the letter, we said, you 

## 22

4 know, we could just say have the feds do quad 0, but the 5 

### letter explained that even though that is an option, 6 this is just basically to inform them that that's an 7 

### option, we had decided in-house that it would be more 8 

### appropriate for the Department to implement it. 9 10 l1 

### 12 

### MR. FULFER: To implement it. MS. WEAVER: Yeah. MR. FULFER: Okay. On page 3 

### of your testimony, it talks about 13 

### the Federal Register notices for revision to 40 

### CFR Part**l~** 

### 60 and 63, and it says in there that quad 0 would not be 15 included if the Board adopts Part 77. 16 

### Is

-- I'm still a little confused**abou~** 

### -- 17 18 19 

### MS. WEAVER: Oh. What

-- that

-- it was poorly written. Sorry. If

-- if Part 77 was adopted as it was 20 

### originally proposed in the request for hearing, then the 21 

### date would not have would not be

-- the date would be 22 

### August 29th. In our original proposal when we requested 23 

### a hearing, we said August 29th is the date through

-- 24 

### the published through date. 25 

### Since then we have requested that that date be KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 

### Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 

### (505) 243-5018

- 

### Fax (505) 243-3606

### 1 changed, so that now we're proposing the date be 2 

### September 23rd. If we didn't move that date, then quad 3 0 would not be included in this

-- in this change, and 4 quad 0 

### would not be incorporated by reference. 5 So it's up to the Board to decide whether to 6 accept the Department's amended exhibit rather than the 7 original one that we requested hearing for. 8 9 

### 10 11 

### 12 13 14 questions. you, Rita. MR. FULFER: Okay. MR. VOLKERDING: Any other questions? Member Ryan. MS. RYAN: Yes. I'd like to talk-- two And

-- and this may be better addressed to I'm not sure. 

### One, I'd like to hear some testimony on the 15 substance of quad 0, 

### what it actually does. 16 

### And then, second, how the state plans to 17 implement quad 0, 

### if we adopt it. 18 MS. BATES: Actually, I believe that 19 Ms. Weaver would be the correct MS. RYAN: Okay. 

### 23

20 21 MS. BATES: person to answer the substance. 22 I know that what I can say is that we've 23 been working diligently with our oil and gas 24 stakeholders on developing a new general construction 25 permit to cover sources that hadn't previously been KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606

### 24 1 regulated by New Mexico, that were covered under quad 0, 2 and so that they will easily be able to have permits for 3 those sources under a general permit, which is a very 4 simple way of doing it. 5 It's a 30-day

-- basically a 30-day action for 6 us, and it covers them that

-- that way they don't have 7 to do like major permitting actions all across the 8 state. 9 So we have been working very closely with the 10 regulated community on the requirements in quad 0, 

### and 11 as you can see, apparently, they're happy with the 12 outcome of that since no one's here to request that we 13 don't take delegation. 14 15 MS. RYAN: MS. BATES: Okay. But I will let Ms. Weaver talk 16 about all of the things

-- the substance of quad 0. 

### 17 You researched it more than I have. 18 MS. WEAVER: Well, in our July 24th

-- or -- 19 excuse me -- June 24th petition for hearing, Attachment 20 D is a summary of the proposed updates to requirements 21 for storage tanks used in oil and natural gas 22 production. And it's

-- goes on for a few pages. 23 Basically storage tanks are very common in the 24 oil and gas industry, to hold things before they're 25 transported, and they're temporary, and this action that KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606

### 25
1 

### EPA proposed

-- and this talks about the proposal, 2 

### because it had not yet gone final

-- would set standards 3 of performance for the emissions of volatile organic 

### 4 compounds that come out of those storage tanks. 5 

### 6 7 And it sets emission limits. There's test protocols. Control equipment. Clarifies the type of tanks in the rule. Monitoring. There's

-- it's 8 

### actually fairly extensive. 9 And so when

-- the general construction permit 10 

### that the Department is developing would actually provide 11 

### sources an avenue to get a permit that would reduce 12 

### their emissions to the point that they would not be 13 

### subject to quad 0 

### at all. 14 

### MS. RYAN: Can you -- can you explain that in 15 

### more detail? 16 

### MS. WEAVER: Because quad 0 

### would be triggered 17 

### if you have a certain number of emissions. If you're 18 

### under those emissions and you have enforceable 19 requirements that keep you under those emissions or 20 

### you're just so small that you can't possibly meet more 21 

### than that much, then you won't be subject to quad 0, 

### or 22 

### any -- you know, the NSPSes and NESHAPs and MACTs. They 23 

### all have those kinds of thresholds. 24 25 

### MS. RYAN: Urn-hum. MS. WEAVER: And so what the Department's KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 

### Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- 

### Fax (505) 243-36061 

### developing is something that would get enforceable 2 

### limits to sources that would otherwise be subject to 3 quad 0. 4 5 

### MS. RYAN: Urn-hum. MS. WEAVER: But now they're taking on limits 6 to keep them below that, and it

-- then they're not 7 

### subject to the record-keeping, testing and all of that. 8 

### MS. RYAN: And how

-- how is that determined, 

### 26

9 

### you know, that initial determination made? I 

### mean, does 10 someone from the Department go out there and test the 11 

### emissions, or is there equipment that the operator or 12 whoever, you know, has to purchase for the tanks now? 13 MS. WEAVER: Often in permitting what they do 14 is they determine the potential emissions of a source, 15 because it's the potential emissions not the actual 16 emissions that would get you in there. 17 18 MS. RYAN: Okay. MS. WEAVER: So they have programs. Tanks

-- 19 there's something called Tanks, which you can input what 20 is the volatility of the liquid that's in the tank, what 21 kind of tank, what kind of

-- you know, is it a floating 22 

### roof or a fixed roof or whatever, does it have a heater, 23 all of that kind of

-- even what color it is. 24 Those

-- that information is put into these 25 programs, and then it estimates what your potential KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606

### 27
1 

### emissions would be over the course of the year. And it 2 even takes into account where is the tank, is it in the 3 

### hotter part of the state or a cooler part of the state, 4 

### because more heat would then create more emissions. MS. RYAN: Okay. 5 6 

### MS. WEAVER: And so it's

-- you know, you look 7 at the tank side and all the various configurations 8 

### 9 10 11 

### 12 determine MS. RYAN: Om-hum. MS. WEAVER:

-- about that tank. MS. RYAN: Okay. So then the operator would get some kind of you know, information on what the potential 13 is, and then you're saying that there's things you could 14 do to keep those limits low to where you would never 15 ever be subject to quad 0. 16 And is that through, you know, new storage 17 tanks, updating of equipment, or can you explain how 18 maybe reducing

-- how operators are reducing that? 19 MS. WEAVER: I'm not familiar with the exact 20 language of the proposed construction permit 21 22 MS. RYAN: Om-hum. MS. WEAVER:

-- general construction permit, 23 GCP. 24 But in general in the permit program, if you 25 have enforceable limits under a permit KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-36061 2 3 GCP
-- 4 5 

### MS. RYAN; l-IS. WEAVER:

MS. RYAN: MS. WEAVER: Urn-hum.

-- your regular permit, or a

Urn-hum.

-- then that counts. And if you 6 don't have any enforceable limits, then it's what could 7 

### you possibly meet if you ran all

-- you know, 24/7/365. 

## 28

8 And so it's --does that answer your question? 9 

### Am I 

### going

-- 10 

### MS. RYAN: No. You are. No. Yeah. This is 11 

### good. 12 

### MS. WEAVER: Okay. So it's the way that the 

### 13 air programs that work in general 14 15 

### MS. RYAN: MS. WEAVER: Okay.

-- that the thre olds are based 16 

### on your potential emissions. 17 

### MS. RYAN: Urn-hum. 18 

### MS. WEAVER: But there are ways that you can 19 take on -- voluntarily take on limits that will change 20 

### what your potential emissions are in that 

### you have the 21 

### limit that you've taken on counts. 22 23 

### MS. RYAN: Right. So does quad 0 

### cover just the construction of 24 

### a new -- of new storage tanks, or does it

-- is it 25 

### retroactive in trying to bring a bunch of older storage KATEY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110**Twel~th** 

### Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- 

### Fax (505) 243-36061 2 

### tanks up up to par? I mean, they're a new source, but are we 3 talking about new storage tanks, to get a general 4 construction permit, "Hey, I'm going to get a new 5 

### storage tank"? That makes sense to me. But what about 6 all the old storage tanks? 7 

### MS. BATES: If you refer back to the 8 

### Attachment D, it talks about what

-- it basically has 9 two groups of tanks, Group 1 tanks and Group 2 

### tanks. 10 11 MS. RYAN: Urn-hum. MS. BATES: So for tanks constructed between 12 August 23, 2011, and the date of today's proposal, and 13 I'm not sure what date that was, so it would be 14 

### August 23 of 2011. 15 16 MS. RYAN: Urn-hum. MS. BA7ES: And I'm not sure of the date of 17 this proposal, but in 2012. 18 MS. WEAVER: Well, the proposal came out 19 before it went final. 20 21 22 23 

### 24 the

-- 25 

### MS. BATES: Right. So it's from a certain time from the date. MS. WEAVER: July 31st. MS. BATES: July 31st of 2013

-- that was

MS. WEAVER: No. Wait. KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 

### 29

110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 {505) 243-5018

- 

### Fax (505) 

### 243-3606

### 30 1 

### MS. BATES:

-- final action on the proposal. 2 

### So we have to research it a little more -- 

### 3 MS. WEAVER: Yeah. 4 MS. BATES:

-- but basically the way the New 5 Source Performance Standards are is they set dates by 6 

### which they become effective so it doesn't include all 7 It would

11


### -- the new sources 

### 12 Along the way. 

### 13

-- not really, really old tanks. 14 

### Unless they're replaced, and then 15 

### they

-- 16 

### MS. RYAN: And if the replacements 

### 17 (Simultaneous discussion.) 

### 18 MS. RYAN: That was my next question, was 19 

### replacements require

-- or how much replacement of a new 

### 20 tank requires the general construction permit. 

### 21 MS. BATES: If the tank was replaced or -- I 22 

### don't know

-- 23 

### MS. RYAN: Or fixing or modifications or 24 

### mechanical issues, someone goes out there and fixes it 25 

### or adds some new pipe connection or -- or something KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 

### 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 

### 87102 (505) 243-5018

- 

### Fax (505) 243-3606

### 31 1 does that all of a sudden require a general construction 2 

### permit? 3 

### MS. WEAVER: The construction permits are 4 

### one is under the construction permit program, if or.e 5 meets 10 pounds an hour, 25 tons per year of any 6 

### criteria pollutant, which would include the volatile 7 

### organic compounds, and a lot of tanks in the state are 8 

### already under permits that are issued there. 9 

### MS. RYAN: Urn-hum. 10 MS. WEAVER: And those tanks would already 11 have emission limits, so they wouldn't really need to 12 

### worry about this r.ecessarily 13 

### MS. RYAN: Okay. 14 

### MS. WEAVER:

-- or they could revise their 15 

### permit to do that. 16 

### MS. RYAN: Okay. 

### 17 MS. WEAVER: The general construction permit 18 

### would only be

-- would be available to sources that are 

### 19 too small to have already triggered 20 

### MS. RYAN: Oh, okay. 21 

### MS. WEAVER:

- the overall permit program. 22 

### t1S. RYAN: Okay. 23 MS. 

### WEAVER: And so it's another opportunity 24 

### for them so they don't have to go through the whole 25 

### permit program. They can go through a simplified KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- 

### Fax (505) 243-3606

### 32
1 streamlined version

-- or I shouldn't say streamlined

-- 2 a simplified version of the permit 3 MS. RYAN: Urn-hum. 4 MS. WEAVER:

-- so they can get a permit more 5 easily. 6 MS. RYAN: Okay. 7 MS. WEAVER: But in any case, a lot of sources 8 may choose to get permit conditions, and if they do, 

### 9 then they don't really have to worry about change

-- 10 getting a new one or changing it out, because they 11 already have that permit condition. They might need to 12 inform the Department that they're changing it out, but 13 it wouldn't change their applicability under quad 0. 14 15 MS. RYAN: Okay. MS. WEAVER: So if they've got a permit, 16 they're pretty much okay. 17 MS. RYAN: Okay. I see what you're saying. 18 MS. BATES: The general construction permit 19 was developed in order to make sure that they were kept 20 out of all these requirements. 21 MS. RYAN: Right. 22 MS. BATES: So, you know, that was the point 23 of us developing this general permit

-- 24 25 MS. RYAN: Right. MS. BATES:

-- to keep them from having to
-- KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606

### 33
1 

### MS. WEAVER: Give them an option. 2 

### MS. BATES: Yeah. 3 

### And they don't have to come in and get it. 4 They can choose instead to meet the requirements of quad 5 0 

### and not get a general permit. I 

### don't know why they 6 

### would want to do that. 7 

### MS. RYAN: Right. 8 

### MS. BATES: This really simplifies their 9 

### requirements. 10 

### MS. RYAN: And does the permit apply to just 11 

### some specific storage tanks on one particular spot or 12 

### like a large area or, you know, a bunch of tanks in a 13 

### general, you know, section or -- 14 

### MS. WEAVER: Generally permits are issued 15 

### on -- based on facility. 16 

### MS. RYAN: Okay. 17 

### MS. WEAVER: And a facility is

-- there's ways 18 

### of defining a facility, but it's usually just that one 19 

### location. 20 

### MS. RYAN: Just that one location. Okay. 21 

### MS. WEAVER: Yeah. 22 

### MS. RYAN: Okay. Thank you for going into all 23 

### that detail for me. 24 25 

### MS. BATES: Air Quality Permitting 101. 

### MS. RYAN: Yes. KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 

### Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- 

### Fax (505) 243-36061 

### 2 MR. VOLKERDING: Other Board questions? MS. PEACOCK: On Exhibit 6, which is the list34



### 3 of all of the changes to the CFRs, both 60 and 63, since 4 January 1st, 2011, Ms. Weaver, in your testimony today, 5 you said that the EPA periodically requests that the 6 State of New Mexico update those. 7 

### Is that a request from the EPA, or is it 8 something that you periodically come to the Board to 9 request? 10 MS. WEAVER: We periodically come to the 11 Board. 12 MS. BATES: Actually, I'd like to clarify 13 that. 14 It is also a condition of our Clean Air Act 15 Section 105 grant commitment to EPA that we update these 16 regulations periodically and take delegation. So they 17 do give us grant funds for taking on the delegation of 18 these rules. 19 MS. PEACOCK: Okay. 20 And then-- so it's been over two years. 21 How often is periodically considered to be in 22 compliance with those grant funds? 23 MS. BATES: It's changed over time. 24 Sometimes

-- depending on what has come out and how it 25 affects New Mexico, we might go a little longer in KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505} 243-5018

- Fax (505} 243-3606

### 35 1 between coming back and asking for a change in the date. 2 

### 3 4 

### Quad 0 was quite important for New Mexico, so this was timely for us. We've been working on this for
a while and decided to to wait until that was close 5 to final before coming to the Board and adopting that. 6 And that's why we're here at this point in time. 7 We feel like it's important for us to adopt 8 those quad 0 

### requirements so that

-- so that our sources 9 don't have to deal with EPA, they can deal with us. 10 It's easier for them, and we can make it easier for them 11 by doing things like developing the general construction 12 permit. 13 14 15 MS. PEACOCK: And so all of this discussion got me confused about the dates. There were the two dates. The one in the petition of August 29th, and then 16 the amended request is September 23rd. 17 And what happened to quad 0 

### between those two 18 dates? 19 MS. WEAVER: Quad 0 

### was proposed in early 20 August

-- I have to look to find a date. But in early 21 August, quad 0 was proposed by

-- actually finalized by 22 

### EPA. It was proposed some months before that. But it 23 was finalized, which meant that EPA

-- you know, they 24 signed it, they posted it, you know, they made it 25 available, it was widely distributed, the finalized KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606

### 1 version of quad 0. 2 And then what happens, just like in New 3 Mexico, you know, you adopt a rule, and then it has to 4 go in the New Mexico Register, and that's part of the 5 

### process. The way that EPA establishes its rules, it 6 finalizes it, but it's not effective until it lands in 7 

### the Federal Register. And it usually only takes days, 8 at most weeks in order for the finalized version to be 9 published. 10 11 12 In this case, there was a delay, and that's actually not not common, that there be such a long delay in that. But the finalized version was signed, 13 and it was sort of the equivalent of when you sign the 14 rule sheet, but it hadn't been published in the Federal 15 Register. 16 But the way our regulation is constructed, we 17 use the publication in the Federal Register as the 18 trigger for taking delegation rather than the date on 19 which it was signed and finalized. And that's

-- it's 20 always worked that way, but in this case, it

-- it 21 messed us up a little bit. 22 MS. PEACOCK: Okay. So that

-- so even if

-- 23 even as of August 29th, the quad 0 

### was published. 24 25 MS. WEAVER: Yes. MS. PEACOCK: And so -- KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 

### 36

110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-36061 

### 2 

### MS. WEAVER: It was not published in the Federal Register. It was broadly available, and it was 3 signed, and it was final, and it was -- it was posted 4 all over the place. 5 6 7 8 9 

### 10 11 

### 12 MS. PEACOCK: Okay. And then it was published on 9/23. MS. WEAVER: In the Federal Register. MS. PEACOCK: Okay. And that's when it was corrected. MS. WEAVER: After the corrections were made. MS. PEACOCK: Okay. So what would happen if we adopted the 13 August 29th date and not bring in quad 0 and then you 14 periodically come to us for updating these regulations? 15 MS. BATES: If that happened, I imagine what 16 we would do is go back, come to you next month, request 17 another hearing and do this again, because it's really 

### 37

18 important for us to take on quad 0. 

### We

-- we think that 19 this is an important rule for New Mexico. It's an 20 important rule for New Mexico sources, and it's 21 important for us. 22 

### There were not substantive changes made, but 23 there were some changes made. We'd just like to get 24 this adopted into our rules, the final version of it. 25 That's up to the Board. If you decide that KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606

### 38 1 the

-- I think we submitted the revised

-- the 2 

### revised 3 When did we submit the revised proposal with 4 the revised date to the Board? Do you recall? 5 

### MR. GRANTHAM: Well, the

-- I mean, the 6 

### petition for hearing was June 24th. The

-- the NOI was, 7 

### of course, in October, October 18. So that had the 8 revision of

-- of the date

-- 9 

### MS. BATES: Okay. 10 MR. GRANTHAM: to September 23rd. 11 

### MS. BATES: And we made it available to the 12 public, as well on our web site and by

-- and by 13 notifying them, so 14 MS. WEAVER: From the 23rd. On September 23rd 15 is when we published

-- we sent an E-mail to all of the 16 

### stakeholders saying •we said we wanted to adopt quad 0, 

### 17 there's been this delay, but you had a chance to look at 18 it, we do

-- we still continue to anticipate asking to 19 take delegation of quad 0. n 

### 20 MS. PEACOCK: Okay. 21 MS. WEAVER: And nobody objected. 22 MS. PEACOCK: Okay. 23 MR. VOLKERDING: If I could follow up on that 24 just

-- 25 MS. PEACOCK: Yeah, please. KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-36061 

### MR. VOLKERDING: Just for clarification, 2 because we've had a number of questions on quad 0 and 3 

### dates and stuff, if the Board were not to
-- were to go 

### 4 with the previous date and therefore we didn't 5 incorporate quad 0, the facilities that are subject to 6 

### quad 0 

### are still subject to quad 0. 7 

### 8 9 10 

### MS. WEAVER: Yes. MR. VOLKERDING: MS. WEAVER: Yes. MR. VOLKERDING: Is that correct?

So this doesn't change any 

### 39

11 

### regulatory requirements that anyone has to meet; is that 12 correct? 13 

### 14 MS. WEAVER: Not at all. MS. BATES: I guess what it would change is 15 

### that they would then have to make those reports to 16 

### EPA

-- 17 18 19 20 

### 21 22 23 

### MR. VOLKERDING: To EPA. MS. BATES:

-- and not to us. MR. VOLKERDING: Okay. MS. PEACOCK: Thank you for that question. MR. VOLKERDING: Okay. You're welcome. MS. PEACOCK: Okay. I have a question on the proposed statement of reasons, Exhibit 14. 

### That's item 24 

### number 2 2. 25 

### So in the first sentence, it says, KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 

### Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- 

### Fax (505) 243-3606

### 40 1 

### "Incorporation by reference of the federal standards 2 into the New Mexico Administrative Code does not change 

### 3 the substantive standards applicable to affected sources 

### 4 in New Mexico because the EPA retains authority for 5 

### direct enforcement of the regulations." 6 And then you said "See Exhibit NMED 3" and 

### 7 your testimony. 8 

### So I 

### went to your testimony, and I believe 

### 9 that the federal statutory cite for that, if you could 10 

### write this down and confirm, would be 42 

### USC 7411 {C) {2) 11 

### and 42 

### USC 7412 {L) {7). 

### 12 And without going into deliberations, I'd just 

### 13 like you to confirm 

### if those would be the correct cites. 14 

### Rather than referring to a testimony, if we could refer 15 

### to those statutory cites. 

### 16 17 

### 18 19 And I've got those here if you don't. MR. GRANTHAM: I do have them. I
-- 

### MS. PEACOCK: Okay. MR. GRANTHAM: Offhand, I know that 7411 

### is 20 

### NS?S and 7412 

### is the MACT standards, but I'd have to 21 

### look at those particulars. I could do that now if you'd 22 

### like. 23 

### MS. PEACOCK: Okay. Thank you. 24 And what

-- in those sections, I'll just read 25 

### to the Board, it says, "Nothing in this subsection shall KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 

### Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- 

### Fax (505) 243-3606

### 41 1 prohibit the administrator•

-- meaning the EPA

-- "from 2 enforcing any applicable standard or performance under 3 

### this section." 

### 4 And that identical language is in both. 5 

### MS. WEAVER: Well, they do retain oversight. 6 

### So even if we take delegation, EPA could enforce if they 7 chose to. 8 

### MR. GRANTHAM: I'm sorry. 9 

### Did you say 7411(C) (7)? 10 MS. PEACOCK: (C) (2). 

### 11 MR. GRANTHAM: (C) (2]. 12 MS. PEACOCK: (c) ( 2) • 

### 13 MR. GRANTHAM: Madam Chair, I agree that that 14 is the appropriate section. 15 

### MS. PEACOCK: Okay. 16 And then the other one was 7412 (L) 

### (7). 17 

### MR. GRANTHAM: Yes. Again, that provides that 18 nothing in this subsection shall prohibit the 19 administrator from enforcing any applicable emission 20 standards. 21 MS. PEACOCK: Okay. Thank you. 22 MR. GRANTHAM: So I agree. 23 

### Thank you. 24 

### MS. PEACOCK: I don't have any further 25 

### questions. KATHY**Tm~NSEND** 

### COURT REPORTERS l10 

### Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- 

### Fax (505) 

### 243-36061 

### 2 3 MR. VOLKERDING: Any other Board questions? Any questions from anyone else in attendance? Okay. Any closing statements, Mr. Grantham? 

### 42

4 MR. GRANTHAM: No. Mr. Hearing Officer, Madam 5 Chair, members of the Board, we respectfully request the 6 

### amendments to Part 77 

### and Part 82 

### for the reasons given 7 

### in the written and oral testimony. 8 

### MR. VOLKERDING: Does anyone have any reason 

### 9 to leave the record open? 10 Not hearing any, the record is closed. The 11 

### hearing is adjourned. 12 And I will turn it over to the Chair. 13 MS. PEACOCK: okay. And we'll do 14 

### deliberations now. Okay. Any comments, discussion? 15 

### 16 MR. MORROW: Support the changes, but I have 17 

### no comments. MS. RYAN: I 

### have some comments. 18 19 

### I am for

-- what will be the proper term
-- 20 

### adopting the proposed changes by the Department, and the 21 

### main reason is the way the Department is going about 22 

### implementing this in New Mexico. 23 

### If the Department

-- and I just want to 24 

### applaud the Department for getting creative and working 25 

### with industry on the actual implementation of this KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 

### Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-50:8

- 

### Fax (505) 243-36061 program, because that's where this could all hang up, 2 you know, and that's where there could be a huge fight. 3 And so the fact that we don't have

-- stakeholders 43

4 weren't picketing the streets on this

-- I mean, I think 5 that-- that's the thing. 6 And I just

-- I just see a lot of effort on 7 the Department's part to try to make this work, make it 8 easier, give alternatives, you know, especially for

-- 9 there's a lot of small, independent operators out there, 10 and so if I had not heard the testimony on that 11 particular issue, I would probably have a very different 12 opinion about this. 13 And so I just want to applaud the Department 14 for doing that and

-- and just encourage the Department 15 to continue to do that in all of its implementation of 16 17 all of its programs. I mean, I think that the rest of the Department you know, your Bureau should be an 18 example of how to work with industry. 19 20 21 The industry, you know, I think, wants to wants to have a clean environment, as well. Nobody wants to harm the environment. But it's the way we go 22 about it that makes

-- it's the way we do it that makes 23 all the difference. 24 So I just wanted to make that comment 

## to the 25 Department and say that's why I

-- you know, that's why KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606

## 44
1 I support it. 2 

### MR. FULFER: I'll agree with Beth. I think 3 that's a -- I have to applaud you for that, and that's a 4 

### great move toward me, and I'll support the amendments. 5 

### MS. PEACOCK: So we need

-- our attorney has 6 

### pointed out we probably need to have a discussion about 7 

### 20 .1.1. 301, 

### which is notice of hearings, that there 8 

### have

-- the Board shall give public notice of the 9 hearing at least 60 days prior to the hearing. 10 So we have the amendment proposed first at the 11 

### date of September

-- 12 

### MS. LEWIS: 23rd, I believe. 13 

### MS. RYAN: 23rd. MS. PEACOCK: 23rd, and then the amendment 15 

### was presented on October 18th. 16 

### In reading our rules, it says the Board shall 17 

### give public notice of the hearing. 18 

### MR. VOLKER:JING: Urn-hum. 19 MS. PEACOCK: So I'll just say I'm personally 20 

### comfortable with that. There's a -- there's a lot of 21 amendments that are submitted during the hearing 22 

### process, often right before the hearing, but I

-- is 23 there any discussion on that? 24 

### MR. VOLKERDING: I tend to agree. What we do 25 normally is receive all kinds of things up to the last KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 

### Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- 

### Fax (505) 243-36061 minute, and I guess as long as it's not something that 2 would substantively change what the

-- what the hearing 3 is about, I would think that the only requirement there 

### 4 is that the notice of the hearing be presented. 5 6 And so I would tend to agree. MS. RYAN: And I think just as the belt and 

### 45

7 suspenders, the substance of the hearing did not change. 8 It was always about this, and the changes that were made 9 between August and September to quad 0 by the EPA were 10 not substantive. We're not changing subjects or 11 anything like that. 12 So I'm comfortable with it. 13 14 15 MS. PEACOCK: Okay. Are you comfortable with that? MS. LEWIS: I just wanted to bring it to your 16 attention. 17 MR. VOLKERDING: Thank you. 18 MS. PEACOCK: No. And I

-- sir. 19 MR. GRANTHAM: Madam Chair, if you don't mind 20 me interjecting here, the

-- in terms of the question of 21 sufficiency of notice for hearing, the test is whether 22 it's a logical outgrowth of what was proposed, and here 23 clearly when it was our express intent to incorporate 24 subpart quad 0, and that's why we originally set the 25 date for August 29th, it's clearly a logical outgrowth KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606

### 46 1 that we would amend that date if necessary based on 2 events or the fact that it wasn't actually published in 3 the Federal Register. 4 

### And so I think everybody

-- as testimony 5 

### established, everybody had notice of the intent to 6 

### incorporate quad 0. 

### So it meets the logical outgrowth 7 

### test. 8 

### MS. PEACOCK: Okay. 9 

### Is there any Board member that disagrees with 10 that? 11 

### MS. RYAN: I 

### agree. 12 MS. PEACOCK: Okay. 13 

### Any other discussion? 14 

### Is there a motion? 15 

### MS. RYAN: I 

### move to adopt the proposed 16 revisions to 20.2.77 and 20.2.82 NMAC. 

### 17 MS. PEACOCK: As amended? 18 

### MS. RYAN: As amended. 19 

### MS. PEACOCK: Okay. 20 Is there a second? 21 

### MR. MORROW: Second. 22 MR. VOLKERDING: Who seconded? Tim? 23 

### Okay. 24 

### Any further discussion? 25 Okay. All in favor? KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- 

### Fax (505) 

### 243-36061 

### I'm sorry. 2 

### (Simultaneous responses.) 

### 3 MS. PEACOCK: Any opposed? 4 

### Okay. The vote was unanimous. 5 So let's move on to the statement of reasons, 6 the proposed statement of reasons in Exhibit 14. 7 

### By the way, I appreciate the Department 8 

### addressing the three statutory requirements in both of 9 

### these hearings today. 10 In paragraph 18, 

### I'd like to propose that we 11 change the language to similar language that we saw in 12 the other one, so it would read "The proposed revisions 13 

### satisfy the requirements of the Air Quality Control Act 14 NMSA 1978 74-2-5.E in that the Board has given the 15 weight it**de~ms** 

### appropriate." 16 

### MS. RYAN: I was thinking of doing that, 17 because it seems like 18 

### is saying here's what we're 18 required to consider, but over on 22

-- paragraph 23, 19 

### it's making the determination that those requirements 20 are satisfied, and I

-- I 

### kind of have

-- I mean, I 21 would like to expand the paragraphs or maybe add one 22 more a little bit, that not only has the EPA made some 23 determinations within itself considering those 24 requirements, but the EIB has reviewed them 

## 47

25 independently and also agrees, and get a little bit more KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 

### Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- 

### Fax (505) 243-3606

### 1 specific regarding the testimony we heard today about 2 the economic impact and the way the Department is 3 implementing. 4 

### I'm not sure I'm ready to finalize this 5 

### today

-- or would like to submit to the Chair some 6 haven't really thought about it

-- just a couple more 7 sentences on the

-- because of the way the state is 8 implementing this program, that EIB has independently I



### 9 determined

-- independent from the EPA, determined that 10 it satisfied those requirements under 74-2-5.E. 11 That's what I'm trying to say. 

### 48

12 MS. PEACOCK: So let me ask a question to you, 13 Cheryl. 14 Would we have a transcript prior to 15 December

-- December 16th? 16 THE REPORTER: Yes. 17 MS. PEACOCK: Okay. So we could bring this 18 back to the Board for approval of a final statement of 19 reasons on December 16th. 20 21 22 MS. RYAN: Would that be okay? MS. PEACOCK: Urn-hum. MS. RYAN: Because I was scribbling all over 23 this, and I thought this is dumb, I just need to look at 24 it and give me like a little bit

-- few more minutes to 25 make it pretty. KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-36061 

### 2 3 

### 49 MS. PEACOCK: Urn-hum. Urn-hum. And then another change I'd like to suggest is in paragraph 22. I brought this up during the 4 questioning, was to replace the reference to the exhibit 5 with the actual federal cites of 42 USC 7411 (C) (2) and 6 42 USC 7412 (L) (7). 7 

### MR. MORROW: Good idea. 8 

### MS. PEACOCK: Are there any other comments for 9 

### the Board? 10 And what I'll do is work to get a statement of 11 

### reasons, a draft ready for the Board meeting. 12 13 14 MS. RYAN: Okay. I like that. MR. VOLKERDING: That sounds good. MS. PEACOCK: Okay. Then we're done with item 15 number 7. 16 (Proceedings adjourned at 11:31 a.m.) 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 

### 24 25 KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606

## 50
1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 

### ss. 3 

### COUNTY OF BERNALILLO 4 5 6 

### I, CHERYL ARREGUIN, the officer before whom the 7 

### foregoing proceeding was taken, do hereby certify that 8 the witnesses whose testimony appears in the foregoing 

### 9 transcript were duly sworn or affirmed; that I 10 

### personally recorded the testimony by machine shorthand; 11 

### that said transcript is a true record of the testimony 12 

### given by said witnesses; that I am neither attorney nor 13 

### counsel for, nor related to or employed by any of the 14 

### parties to the action in which this proceeding is taken, 15 

### and that I am not a**re~ative** 

### or employee of any attorney 16 

### or counsel employed by the parties hereto or financially 17 interested in the action. 18 19 20 

### 21 22 

### 23 24 25 

### My Commission Expires: NOTARY PUBL CCR License Number: 21 

### Expires: 12/31/2013
12/12/15

KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth**S~reet,** 

### Northwest, Albuquerque, New**Mex~co** 

### 87102 (505) 243-5018

- 

### Fax (505) 243-3606

### 1 20:13 14:23, 19:16, 22:13 9a[2[-4:18, 19:8 5:2 20.1.1.301 [1]- 44:7 42 [5[- 5:6, 40:10, 9b [2]- 4:20, 19:9 admitted 121- 20:22, 20.2.77[6]-1:5, 4:8, 40:11' 49:5, 49:6 20:24 1 [9]- 4:4, 4:12, 4:23, 6:4,6:12, 11:13, 

### A**adopt~[-** 9:18, 9:5, 10:11,20:10, 46:16 

### 5 23:17, 35:7, 36:3, 20:21' 20:24, 29:9 20.2.82**[~-** 1:5, 4:9, 38:16, 46:15

1,600 [1[-14:9 6:4,6:13,11:13, a.m121**~** 1:20,49:16 adopted [SJ- 12:6, 10[6[-4:22, 12:1, 46:16 5 [2]- 4:9, 13:7 ABBY 111

- 2:6 13:2,22:19, 37:12, 15:12,21:8,21:14, 2011 [5J- 4:12, 505[21- 2:9,2:15 ability 111- 15:6 37:24 31:5 10:11,29:12,29:14, able 111 - 24:2 adopting {3J
- 17:16,

101 [1]- 33:24 34:4 

### 6 above-entitled [1]
- 35:5, 42:20 105[11- 34:15 2012[11- 29:17 1:17 adoption[tJ- 18:1 10:35[1[-1:20 2013[21[-1:17, 6 [61- 4:10, 10:17, accept 111- 23:6 adopts[1J- 22:15 11 [2]- 4:24, 15:23 4:12,4:13,4:23, 4:24, 13:25, 14:12, 16:14, accepts {1]-13:10 adverse[1J- 20:18 111 [1[-13:3 5:5,5:12, 10:11, 34:2 access 111-16:25 Advisory[1J- 20:14 111(<)11!-12:8 12:12, 13:6, 14:19, 60**~~-** 4:10, 12:10, accomplish 111- affected 111- 40:3 112(1)(7!1!-13:3 14:20,15:11,15:21, 14:5, 16:10, 17:1, 11:21 affecting [11- 7:2 1190!11- 2:14 16:9, 16:14, 16:23, 19:16, 22:14, 34:3, accomplished 111- affects 111- 34:25 11:31 [11- 49:16 19:4, 19:5, 19:7, 44:9 19:17 Affidavit [1]- 4:18 12 [21- 5:4, 16:18 29:23**63~[-4:10,** 13:5, accordance[11
- affirmed 121- 8:8, 12112/15[11- 50:22 21 [21- 3:9, 50:20 14:5, 19:16, 22:14, 6:16 50:9 12131/2013 [1]

- 22**~~-** 39:24, 47:18, 34:3 account[2]-18:17, Agency [31
- 4:14, 50:20 49:3 27:2 4:16, 5:4

12th [1]- 19:7 222-9594[11- 2:15 

### 7 Achievable 111- agreereJ-41:13, 13 [3J- 5:6, 10:2, 23 [5J- 4:13,4:24, 12:17 41:22,44:2,44:24, 20:10 29:12, 29:14, 47:18 achieving 111- 18:17 45:5, 46:11

13-07 [1J- 6:3 23rd[14J-10:11, 7[4[-4:14,6:1, Aci[9J-9:23, 10:1, agreement121 - 13-07(Ri1J-1:3 12:12, 14:20, 15:1, 12:15, 49:15 10:5,11:18,12:7, 12:15, 13:8 13-07(R) 111- 6:15 15:21, 16:23, 23:2, 74-2-5.E 131- 17:14, 13:4, 17:14, 34:14, agrees 111 - 47:25 14[4[-5:8, 20:11, 35:16, 38:10, 38:14, 47:14, 48:10 47:13 ahead[t]-8:10 39:23, 47:6 44:12,44:13,44:14 7411**[~-** 5:6,40:19 act[1J- 6:9 aiq111- 6:3, 6:12,

15[5[-4:15, 5:10, 24/7/365 [11

- 28:7 7411(C)(2 121- 40:10, action [5]- 24:5, 9:24,10:4,11:1,11:4, 14:3, 14:8, 20:10 24th [3J- 24:18, 49:5 24:25, 30:1' 50:14, 11:9, 17:21' 17:23,

1508 [1J- 2:8 24:19, 38:6 7411(C)(7 111- 41:9 50:17 28:13, 33:24 16[5]- 5:11,14:23, 25[1]-31:5**7412[~-** 5:7,40:20 actions 111- 24:7 AIR[1J-1:4 20:13,20:21, 20:24 27 [1]- 4:17 7412(L)(7) [3J- actual [3]

- 26:15, Air[15]- 7:23, 8:19.

16th [21- 48:15, 28th [1]- 19:4 40:11,41:16,49:6 42:25, 49:5 8:20, 9:8,9:23, 10:1, 48:19 29 [1J- 4:12 77[11[-11:14, 12:4, Adi1J-4:20 10:5,11:18,12:7,

17 [11- 5:12 29th [10]- 13:6, 13:18, 14:18, 15:17,**add~~-** 20:10, 12:18, 13:4, 17:14, 18 [3J- 38:7, 47:10, 14:19, 14:25, 16:9, 15:21, 19:13, 19:18, 47:21 19:6,34:14,47:13 47:17 22:22, 22:23, 35:15, 22:15,22:19, 42:6 additional [1]-14:21 Albuquerque 121-

18th[1j-44:15 36:23, 37:13,45:25 78 [1]-12:22 addressed 111- 4:21, 19:4 19 [1]- 3:8 7th [1J- 1:16 23:12 alert[1J- 20:15 1978[11- 47:14 

### 3 addressing 111- 47:8 alewis@nmag.gov 1985 [2J- 4:15, 4:17 

### 8 adds [1]- 30:25 [11- 2:10 1995 [1]- 12:6 adequate[2J-16:5, 8IIOW[2]-10:9, 16:9 1998 [11- 13:2 3J4J- 4:6,9:17, 17:7 allows[1J-21:18 1st[2J-15:11, 34:4 22:12, 40:6 8 [4J

- 3:6, 4:16, 13:5, adequately [1]- alter 111- 11:6 30 [11- 5:5 13:8 18:16 alternative111 - 

### 2 30-day 121- 24:5 s2rJ-11:14, 12:16. adjourned 121- 21:10 30thj2J-16:16, 19:5 13:18, 15:13, 19:13, 42:11,49:16 alternatives 111- 311[1[-1:19 19:18,42:6 administered 111- 43:8 2[5]-4:5, 12:11, 31st[2J- 29:22, 827-6921 [11

- 2:9 21:24 amend [2]- 15:20, 13:5, 20:5, 29:9 29:23 87504-1508 [1J- 2:9 Administrative 111- 46:1 20 [17]- 4:4, 4:5, 4:6, 87505[1]- 2:15 40:2 amended [13]- 4:8,4:9,4:13,4:15, 

### 4 administrator [4]- 11:23,12:3,12:11, 4:17,4:19, 4:21' 4:23, 

### 9 6:15,7:7,41:1,41:19 13:5, 13:20, 14:5, 4:24, 5:5, 5:7, 5:9, 4 [2]- 4:7, 12:14 admission [21- 20:9, 14:19, 14:21, 17:3, 5:10, 5:12 40[9[-4:10, 11:19, 9[1[-12:11 20:20 23:6, 35:16,46:17,

20.1.1[2[-6:17, 12:10, 13:4, 14:4, 9/23 [11- 37:6 ADMITTED 121- 4:2, 46:18 KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606 

### 1amendment[4J- authority[61

- 9:24, 34:8, 34:11' 35:5, changes[11J- 9:13, compared [1]-14:14 17:9, 18:5,44:10, 10:4, 10:17, 12:7, 37:25, 38:4, 39:3, 14:14, 15:14, 16:6, compliance 121- 44:14 13:3, 40:4 40:25, 42:1' 42:5, 17:6, 34:3, 37:22, 10:22, 34:22

AMENDMENTS 111- avallable[6J -16:24, 44:8,44:16, 46:9, 37:23, 42:16, 42:20, compounds 121 - 1:4 17:5, 31:18, 35:25, 47:14, 48:18, 49:9, 45:8 25:4,31:7 amendments [141- 37:2, 38:11 49:11 Changes 111- 5:9 compromise 111- 4:7, 4:9, 6:3, 6:12, avenue 111- 25:11 Board'S[1J- 6:17 changing [J]- 32:10, 15:6 10:10, 14:1, 14:22, briefly [2i- 8:23, 9:7 32:12,45:10 conclusion 111- 15:10, 15:18, 19:13, 

### 8 bring [4]- 28:25, Chapter[1J- 11:19 19:12 19:18, 42:6, 44:4, 37:13,45:15,48:17 character[2J- 17:17, condition 121- 32:11, 44:21 broadly 111- 37:2 17:18 34:14

Amendments 111- bachelor 111- 8:25 brought 111- 49:3 Cheryl 121- 7:4, conditions 111- 32:8 4:10 background 121- Bulldlng111-1:19 48:13 conduct 121- 6:18,

amends[1J-13:15 8:24, 10:12 bunch 121- 28:25, CHERYL 111- 50:6 9:10 ANDJ1]-1:5 based [JJ- 28:15, 33:12 choose 121- 32:8, conducted 111-6:16 announced [1)-14:1 33:15,46:1 burden 111- 11:3 33:4 configurations 111- announcements 111 BATES [321- 3:4, Bureau [61- 7:23, chose 111- 41:7 27:7

- 13:22 8:7, 12:23, 12:25, 8:19, 8:21,9:8, 19:6, chosen [2]-16:9, confirm 121-40:10,

answer [3]- 6:2, 19:23,23:18,23:21, 43:17 21:22 40:13 23:21, 28:8 24:15,29:7,29:11, Business 111-20:14 circulation 111- 19:2 Confirmation 111 -

anticipate[1J- 36:16 29:16, 29:20, 29:23, businesses 111- cite 111- 40:9 4:20 appearance 111 - 30:1, 30:4, 30:9, 20:19 cites [3]- 40:13, confused [3J- 21:9, 7:18 30:11,30:13,30:21, BY[JJ- 8:13,19:24, 40:15,49:5 22:16, 35:14

applaud [3]- 42:24, 32:18, 32:22, 32:25, 21:6 civil 111- 2:7 confusion 111- 15:7 43:13, 44:3 33:2, 33:8, 33:24, Civil (1]- 6:20 connection 111-

applicability 111

- 34:12, 34:23, 37:15, 

# c clarification 111 - 30:25 38:9,38:11,39:14, 32:13 39:18 39:1 conslder[3J
- 6:11,

applicable [41
- Bates raJ- 3:7,4:5, C)(2)12J- 41:10, clarifies 111- 25:6 18:10,47:18 10:21,40:3,41:2, clarify 111- 34:12 consideration 121 - 41:19 7:24, 8:1, 19:22,20:1 41:12 Clean [7]- 9:23, 17:15, 18:15

apply]Jl

- 6:21, BE]1[- 1:16 c)(2)J1[-41:11 10:1,10:5,11:18, considered 111- 18:4, 33:10 become 121- 7:6, California[1]- 9:1 12:7, 13:4, 34:14 34:21 30:6 appreciate 111- 47:7 Capitol 111 - 1:19 clean 111- 43:20 considering 111 - approach 111-21:10 believes[1]-19:14 case[4]- 9:3,32:7, clearly 121- 45:23, 47:23 appropriate (4]- below 111- 26:6 36:10, 36:20 45:25 constructed 121 - 17:4,22:8,41:14, belt 111- 45:6 Categories 111 - close 111- 35:4 29:11, 36:16 47:15 beneficial 111- 19:15 12:18 closed 111-42:10 construction [13]-

approval 111- 46:16 BERNALILLO 111- CCR 111- 50:20 closely 111- 24:9 23:24, 25:9, 27:20, area[1J-33:12 50:3 CD ]JI- 5:10, 14:8, closing 111- 42:3 27:22, 28:23, 29:4, ARREGUIN 111- 50:6 bosl]2i-18:15, 14:10 Code[2J-11:19, 30:20, 31:1, 31:3, 21:16 certain (4]
- 17:15, Arreguin 111- 7:4 40:2 31:4, 31:17, 32:18, asslstant[1J- 2:7 Beth 111- 44:2 21:21,25:17,29:21 codified 111- 11:16 35:11 Assistant 111 - 2:12 better 121- 21:24, certify 111- 50:7 color 111- 26:23 contained 121 - Attachment 121- 23:12 CFR JSJ- 4:10, comfortable [3]
- 14:15, 19:8 24:19,29:8 between (7)- 11:15, 11:20, 12:10, 13:5, 44:20,45:12,45:14 containing [1]- 5:10

attendance121 - 14:25,17:6,29:11, 14:5, 14:23, 19:16, coming 121 - 35:1, contains 111- 7:11 6:25, 42:2 35:1' 35:17, 45:9 22:13 35:5 contaminant 111-

attention 111- 45:16 Bill 111-7:21 CFRs 111- 34:3 comment[3]-7:16, 11:9 attorney [31- 44:5, BILL 111-2:12 Chair [7]- 6:6, 7:20, 17:5, 43:24 contaminants [2]- 50:12, 50:15 bill.grantham@ 41:13,42:5,42:12, comments [61- 17:9, 17:21, 17:23

Attorney121- 2:7, state.nm.us 111-2:16 45:19, 48:5 19:10,42:15,42:17, continue 121- 36:16, 2:8 b]I]S]- 21:11,36:21, chance 111-36:17 42:18,49:8 43:15

August 1221- 4:12, 47:22, 47:25, 48:24 change [14]- 16:20, Commission 121- Continued {2]- 5:1, 5:5, 13:6, 14:19, BOARD[2]-1:1, 18:3, 23:3, 28:19, 20:14, 50:22 5:3 14:25, 16:9, 16:14, 21:6 32:9,32:13,35:1, commitment111- control (2]- 6:12, 16:16, 19:4, 19:5, Board [31)- 1:19, 39:10, 39:14, 40:2, 34:15 25:6 19:7,22:22,22:23, 2:2, 3:9,6:9, 7:7, 45:2, 45:7, 47:11' common 121 - 24:23, Control [3]-12:17. 29:12,29:14, 35:15, 7:11' 7:20, 8:2, 10:6, 49:2 36:11 17:14,47:13 35:20, 35:21' 36:23, 13:15, 17:15, 21:4, changed [2]
- 23:1 , community 121 - cooler 111- 27:3 37:13, 45:9, 45:25 22:15, 23:5, 34:1, 34:23 10:25,24:10 copy 121- 7:5, 9:2 KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606 

### 2correctteJ-12:19, 10:19 47:23 effective[JJ-10:15, 39:17,40:4,41:1, 12:23, 12:24, 16:21, days I•J-16:10, determine [4J- 30:6, 36:6 41:6,45:9,47:22, 23:19, 39:8, 39:12, 17:1, 36:7,44:9 10:21, 10:22, 26:14, efficient[1J-10:15 48:9 40:13 deal 121 - 35:9 27:12 effort[1J- 43:6 equipment [3]- 25:6,

corrected 121 - 16:1, DEBORAH 111- 2:3 determined 131 - EIB [5]- 1:3, 6:2, 26:11,27:17 37:9 Oecember[JJ- 26:8,48:9 6:15,47:24, 48:8 equivalent 111-

correcting {11- 48:15,48:19 develop 121- 9:9, EIB'&(1]-18:25 36:13 15:24 decide 121- 23:5, 9:12 either 111- 11:3 errors (4]- 16:15, correction 111- 37:25 developed 121 - eliminating 111

- 16:17, 16:19 16:19 decided 121-22:7, 18:12, 32:19 17:23 especially 111 - 43:8 corrections 111- 35:4 developing [6]

- ELIZABETH 1'1- 2:5 establish 111- 19:21 37:10 decorum 111- 6:22 18:10, 23:24,25:10, emission [3]- 25:5, established 111-

corresponds 111 - deems 111-47:15 26:1, 32:23, 35:11 31:11,41:19 46:5 14:11 defining 111-33:18 difference 111- 43:23 emissions [17]- establishes 111- costs[1]-18:17 degree[2J-17:17, different111- 43:11 11:4,11:9,18:5, 36:5 counsel 121-50:13, 17:18 digital [1]-14:3 18:15,25:3,25:12, estimates 111- 26:25 50:16 delay{31- 36:10, diligently 111

- 23:23 25:17,25:18,25:19, events 111- 46:2

Counsel [3i- 2:12, 36:12, 38:17 direct[3i-7:25, 8:1, 26:11,26:14,26:15, Evidence 111- 6:21 2:13, 7:20 deiayed[1J-16:23 40:5 26:16, 27:1, 27:4, evidence 111- 20:25

counts 121- 28:5, delegate[2i-12:7, Direct (2i- 3:5, 3:7 28:16,28:20 exact[1]-27:19 28:21 13:3**DIRECT~]-** 8:12, employed 121 - EXAMINATION [3]-

COUNTY 111- 50:3 delegated (1J- 9:25 19:23 50:13, 50:16 8:12, 19:23, 21:5 couple 111- 48:6 delegation 1221 - directly111 - 7:5 employee[1i- 50:15 Examination 121- course[2J- 27:1, 10:7, 10:9, 10:13, disagrees 111- 46:9 encourage 111- 3:5, 3:7 38:7 11:2,11:5,11:17, discussion !71- 43:14 examination [31
-

Court[1]-7:4 12:15, 13:8, 13:10, 30:17, 35:13,42:15,**end~J-21:14,** 3:9, 6:25, 21:2 court [1i- 7:6 15:2, 15:5, 15:10, 44:6,44:23,46:13, 21:15 examined [1i- 8:9 Cover(2]- 23:25, 19:15,21:9,21:20, 46:24 energy [1]-18:19 example[1i- 43:18 28:23 21:23, 24:13, 34:16, distributed 111- enforce [3]- 9:24, except (1]- 21:21

covered 111-24:1 34:17, 36:18, 38:19, 35:25 11:1,41:6 exceptions [3i
- covers 111- 24:6 41:6 Division 121-2:7, enforceable [4i- 11:25,12:3,21:19 create[2J-15:7, deliberations [3]
- 8:19 25:18,26:1,27:25, excerpts (1i- 5:6 27:4 6:2, 40:12,42:14 docketed 111-6:14 28:6 excuse 131- 13:3,

creative 111- 42:24 demonstrated 111- done(1]-49:14 enforcement (1]- 17:18, 24:19 credibility 111- 7:2 18:16 down [1]- 40:10 40:5 Exhibit 1211- 9:5, criteria 111- 31:6 Department[31]
- draft[1J- 49:11 enforcing 121- 41:2, 9:17, 10:2,12:15, cross 121- 6:25, 21:2 2:11, 2:13, 4:22, 5:11, Drawef[1J- 2:8 41:19 13:8, 13:25, 14:3, cross-examination 6:14, 7:22,8:18, Drive 111-2:14 engineering 111- 14:8, 14:12, 15:12, [2]- 6:25, 21:2 10:14, 10:20, 10:25, duly 121- 8:8, 50:9 8:25 15:23, 16:18,20:5, 13:16, 14:13, 18:23, dumb 111- 48:23 English [1i-19:3 20:11,20:13,21:8, 

### D 19:12, 19:14,20:17, during [31- 10:10, entitled 111 - 1:17 21:14, 34:2, 39:23, 22:8, 25:10, 26:10, 44:21, 49:3 environment121 - 40:6, 47:6 32:12, 42:20, 42:21, duties 111- 9:7 43:20, 43:21 exhibit[S]-12:13, Dallas [1J -10:17 42:23, 42:24, 43:13, Environment [7)
- 12:14, 13:7,23:6, date[32]-10:6, 43:14,43:17,43:25, 

### E 2:11, 2:13, 4:22, 5:11, 49:4 11:24,12:11,13:6, 47:7, 48:2 6:14, 7:22, 8:18 Exhiblts[4J -19:8, 13:21, 14:3,14:17, Department's [4J
- ENVIRONMENTAL 20:10, 20:21, 20:24 15:16, 15:21, 15:25, 7:12, 23:6, 25:25, E-mail [4]- 4:24, [1]

- 1:1 existing [11- 11:5 16:8,22:21,22:23, 43:7 15:19, 15:24, 38:15 environmental 111- expand 111-47:21 22:24, 22:25, 23:1, describe [61- 8:23, E-mails[1J-19:10 18:19 Expires 121- 50:20, 23:2,29:12,29:13, 9:7,9:21,11:11, early[2J-35:19, Environmental [7]

- 50:22 29:16, 29:21, 35:1, 13:14, 21:17 35:20 1:18, 2:2,4:14,4:16, explain [3]- 21:11, 35:20,36:18, 37:13, described 121- easler(3J- 35:10, 5:4,6:9,8:18 25:14,27:17 38:4, 38:8, 39:4, 15:17, 19:9 43:8 EPA[26J- 10:16, explained 121 - 44:11,45:25,46:1 designated [11- 6:8 easily [21- 24:2, 32:5 10:24, 11:1, 12:15, 15:22, 22:5

dates[SJ-13:15, detail 121 - 25:15, economic [4]- 11:8, 13:8, 13:20, 16:16, express 111- 45:23 30:5, 35:14, 35:15, 33:23 17:20, 17:22, 48:2 18:9, 18:14,21:24, expressed [1]- 16:4 35:18, 39:3 detenninatlon [31- economy[1]- 18:8 25:1, 34:5, 34:7, extensive [1]- 25:8

Davis [1i- 9:1 20:17, 26:9,47:19 educational 111 - 34:15, 35:9, 35:22, day-to-day 111- determinations(1i- 8:24 35:23, 36:5, 39:16, KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606 

### 3

### F**facilities[~** -11:3, 1 18:4, 39:5 i facility 1•1· 16:2,

33:15, 33:17, 33:18

fact{21·43:3, 46:2 factors [3]-17:15, 18:2, 18:10 fairly 111- 25:8 hlmlllar(2J- 17:13. 27:19

far{1J- 17:1 favor 111- 46:25 Fe**~31** - 1:20, 2:9, 2:15

Federal[ial- 4:11, 5:10. 11:19, 11:23, 13:20, 13:22. 14:4, 14:7, 14:25, 15:19, 16:22,22:13, 36:7, 36:14, 36:17, 37:2, 37:7,46:3

federal 1261 • 9:23, 9:24, 10:7, 10:10. 10:13, 10:16, 11:2. 11:5,11:6,11:17, 11:22, 12:1, 12:9, 13:10, 13:13, 13:14, 13:19, 14:22, 18:12, 18:13, 19:16. 21:20, 40:1,40:9, 49:5**feels~~-** 22:4

few 121- 24:22, 48:24 flght[1j· 43:2 fllo{4)· 7:11,14:3, 14:11, 14:12 filedl3]·6:13, 7:14, 9:3

final !SJ-17:1, 25:2, 29:19, 30:1,35:5, 37:3, 37:24,48:18

finalization 111- 17:6 finalize 111- 48:4 finalized 1101

- 16:12, 16:15, 16:17, 17:4, 35:21, 35:23, 35:25. 36:8.36:12, 36:19

finalizes (1]- 36;6 financiarly 111- 50:16

firstraJ- 8:8, 12:6. 13:2. 15:8. 18:11. 22:3, 39:25.44:10

fixed 111

- 26:22 fixesf1J
- 30:24 fixing 111- 30:23 floating {1J

- 26:21 follow (1}

- 38:23

# ::~~~**,::~:;~:::.:[~:~~;~2~**1:8 50:8 ' 

# l.;azardous !11-

fonnl'l -17:1 , 12:18 fonnal[1[·13:22 

## I**hoalth!~-17:19,** Franels[1!. 2:14 18:7, 18:18 FULFERJ91 2:3, hoaf[1J- 23:14 21:8,21:13.21:16, hoard[J[-6:19. 22:1,22:9,22:11, 43:10,48:1 23:8,44:2 hearing{34J·1:18.**Fu~o<111** 21:7 6:2,6:11,6:16,6:18,

fuii[1J·14:7 7:3, 7:12, 7:25, 9:13, funds 121-34:17, 9:16, 14:16, 15:25, 34:22 16:10, 18:24, 19:1,**~----** ................ 4 20:16, 22:20,22:23, 

### G · 23:7,24:19, 37:17, '-------
.................. 38:6,42:10.42:11,

gas 141·15:4, 23:23, 24:21' 24:24

GCP[2J· 27:23,28:3 gono"'II17J- 10:12. 19.2, 23:24, 24:3, 25:9, 27:22, 27:24, 28:13,29:3, 30:20, 31:1,31:17,32:18, 32:23, 33:5, 33:13, 35:11

Gonorai[4J- 2:7, 2:8, 2:12, 2:13

gonerally 121 10:24, 33:14

given !51- 14:10, 15:15, 42:6, 47:14, 50:12

grant[3J· 34:15, 34:17, 34:22

GRANTHAM [ISJ • 2:12,7:19,8:11,8:13. 13:12, 19:24, 21:1, 38:5,38:10, 40:17, 40.19, 41:8,41:11, 41:13,41:17, 41'22, 42:4, 45:19

Grantham 171- 3:6, 3:8,6:4,7:17,7:21, 8:10, 42:3

great 111- 44:4 GREGORY 111 • 2:3 Group 121 • 29:9 groups[2J· 16:3, 29:9

guoss**1~-** 39:14, 45:1 

### H

hand [lJ- 10:20 hang111 • 43:1 happy 111-24:11 44:9, 44:17,44:21, 44:22, 45:2. 45:4, 45:7,45:21

Hear1ng !41- 6:5, 6:9, 7:19, 42:4

hearings['! -44:7, 47c9

heat111 • 27:4 heater [11- 26:22 held Ill- 6:11 hereby[21· 11:24, 50:7

hereto 111- 50:16 historically [1J21:22

h<>ld :•: , 24:24 HOLT[11·2:5 hotter 111-27:3 hour{2J -1:20,31:5 housef1J- 22:7 hugo£11 • 43:2 hum !HiJ- 25:24, 26:4,27:8,27:21, 28:1,28:4,28:17, 29:10, 29:15, 31:9, 32:3,44:18,48:21, 49:1

id00111 • 49:7 Identical 111- 41:4 imagine 111-37:15 Immediately {1J16:13

impactr4J- 18:19, 20:18, 48:2

lmplement[6J- 9:24, 10:25, 15:7. 22:8, 22:9,23:17

Implementation111- 9:9 fmpJementation [61
- 10:4, 10:14, 10:16, 10:19,4225,43:15

Implementing 1'1 • 42:22, 48:3, 48:8

Important!lll

- 35:2,

. 35:7, 37:18. 37:19,

37:20, 37:21

IMPROVEMENT [I)· 1:1

Improvement(31
- 1:18, 2:2,6:9 IN111 -1:4 ln-hOU$8 !1)**~** 22:7 lnadvertentt2J 16:16, 16:21 includetSJ- 17:10, 17:17,30:6, 30:9, 31:6

inoluded171 9:2, 10:1, 14:8, 16:18, 20:12,22:15,23:3

inc1udes[3J·14:2, 15:23. 16:2

1noluding 121 • 13:23, 17:20

lncorporate(3J39:5, 45:23, 46:6

incorporated [SJ

- 11:24,12:2,13:15, 13:21.14:1, 16:7, 16:11,23:4 lnoorporates !31 12:9, 13:4, 14:21

Incorporation r·,J40:1

incorporation {2!**~** 13:16, 15:16

lncorred[iJ-12:22 increaset4J- 11:3, 11:8,11:9, 18•4

increasedt1J-11:4 lndependent(:Zi**~** 43:9,48:9

Independently 121 : 47:25, 48:8 industryf5J R 16:3, 24:24, 42:25, 43:18, 43:19

Inform 121 • 22:6, 32:12

information 121· 26:24.27:12

informing{1J**~** 15:20 1 initiaii3J·12:15, 113:8, 26:9

injuryi2J·17:18, 18:6 lnput[lJ- 26:19 inspection 111

-

L_

__________

### KATHY**TOW~SE~D** 

### COURT REPORTERS 10:23 Instead 111- 33:4 inll11·4:11 lntentl'l- 7:12, 9:3, 20:3, 45:23, 48:5

lntentlon[JJ-15:9, 15:12, 15:20

lnterest(5J -15:5, 16:3, 16:4, 17:20, 18:7

interested 121

- 15:15, 50:17

interference 121

- 17:19, 18:6

Interjecting[11
- 45:20

introduce(1J -7:18 InvolvedJiJ- 17:24**issuepJ~11:11,** 13:13, 43:11

Issued f3J- 16:16, 31:8, 33:14

lssues11J- 30:24 IT!11·1:16 Hem [3] • 6:1, 39:23. 49:14

ilsolf:<J -16:24, 47:23 

### J

January£3l- 4:12, 10:11,34:4 John(1}- 6:8 JOHN 111-2:4 Journai[2J-4:21, 19:4 JulyJlSJ- 4:17, 4:23, 15:11,24:18,29:22, 29:23**Juno1~** • 24:19, 38:6 

### K

Kathy 111· 7:4 keep 141· 25:19. 26:6, 27:14, 32:25

keeping (tJ- 26:7 kept 111· 32:19 kind 1•1 • 26:21, 26:23,27:11,47:20

klndS[2J • 25.23, 44:25

knowledge{IJ • 18:9



### 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606 

### 4

### L

landsi1i

- 38:6 languag•r•J- 9:10. 10:1,27:20,41:4, 147:11

LANY 131- 3:4, 8:7, 8:12

Lany 1•1- 3:5, 4:4, 4:6, 4:24, 7:24, 8:16

largoi1J- 33:12 lasli2)-7:25, 44:25 laWS[1)·18:14 laastpJ-16:10, 44:9 laaW[1)- 42:9 Letter[2J- 4:14, 4:16 letterm- 4:22,5:11, 15:11, 15:12,20:13, 22:3, 22:5

LEW1S{3)- 2:6, 44:12. 45:15

Lleense[1J- 50:20 llmlli'l- 28:21 limits 1•1- 25:5, 26:2,26:5, 27:14, 1 27:25, 28:6,28:19, 

### I 31:11 I liquid 111

- 26:20 : LlstpJ-4:10

listp) -13:25, 16:2, 34:2

listed 111- 14:12**location~!-** 33:19, 33:20

loglcaiJ3J- 45:22, 45:25,46:6

look [61- 12:20, 27:6, 35:20,38:17, 40:21, 48:23

IOWI1i·27:14 6:10,7:1, 10:12 matters !il**~** 7:1 MATTHEW[1J- 2;5 Maxlmumr1J-12:17 mean [61- 26:9, 29:2, 38:5, 43:4. 43:16, 47:20

meaning 111**~** 41:1 meant111- 35:23 mechanical

### m- 8:25, 30:24

mHII<I- 25:20, 28:7,33:4,39:11

rnaetlng 111

- 49:11**meets~[-31:5,** 46:6

MemberI'!- 23:10 memberrn**~** 46:9 members141

- 7:11, 7:20,21:3,42:5

memo [1J -16:16 Memorandum111 5:5

mentioned 111- 13:18

messed 111- 36:21 MEXICO**~J-1:1,** 50:1

Mexico[26]- 1:18, 1:20, 2:9, 2:11' 2:13, 2:15, 4:19, 4:22, 5:11' 7:22, 10:3, 15:5, 18:4, 19:2, 19:5,24:1, 34:6, 34:25, 35:2, 36:3, 38:4, 37:19, 37:20. 40:2, 40:4, 42:22

MICHAEL 111- 2:4 mlght131- 12:22, 32:11,34:25

mlnd!1!·45:19 mlnut<> 111- 45:1 minutOS[1J·48:24 

### M mlstakenly[11· f----- ----115:25 machlne[1J- 50:10 MACT!JJ-12:21, 13:23. 40:20 MACTSf'J 18:1, 18:11, 25:22 Madam[4J- 7:20, 41:13,42:4,45:19

maiiJ<!-4:24,15:19, 15:24, 38:15

malls111- 19:10 main 111

- 42:21 majorpJ- 24.7 March111- 4:15 MATIER£1]-1:4 matter[i!J-1:17, mlstakesm**~** 16:21 modifications111· 30:23

monitoring [1]- 25:7 month£11· 37:16 months[1)- 35:22 morning (11- 7:19 MORROW i<J- 2:4, 42:16,46:21. 49:7

m0$t[3J

- 15:3, 19:15,36.8

motionf1l- 46:14 moti00$(11**~** 7:14 mov0£71- 6:1, 20:9, moving 111

- 11:10 MR!50J·6:7, 7:19, ' 8:4,8:10, 8:11,8:13, 

## i 13:12, 19:24, 20:22,

21:1,21:3.21:7,21:8, 21:13.21:16,22:1, 22:9,22:11,23:8, 23:9,34:1,38:5. 38:10, 38:23, 39:1, 39:8.39:10, 39:17, 39:19.39:21,40:17. 40:19, 41:8,41:11, 

## i 41:13, 41:17,41:22.

42:1' 42:4. 42:8, 42:16. 44:2,44:18. 44:24, 45:17, 45:19. 46:21, 46:22,49:7. 49:13

MS!175J- 6:1, 12:23, 12:24, 12:25, 13:1, 21:12, 21:15,21:18, 22:2,22:10,22:17, 23:11, 23:18.23:20. 23:21, 24:14,24:15, 24:18. 25:14, 25:16, 25:24, 25:25. 26:4, 26:5, 26:8.26:13. 26:17. 28;18, 27:5, 27:6, 27:8, 27:9, 27:10.27:19, 27:21, 27:22, 28:1. 28:2. 28:4.28:5, 28:10. 

### ! 28:12, 28:14, 28:15, • 28:17,28:18, 28:22,

29:7, 29:10,29:11, 29:15, 29:16, 29:18. 29:20, 29:22. 29:23. 29:25. 30:1,30:3. 30:4, 30:8. 30:9, 30.10, 30:11,30:12. 30:13, 30:14, 30:16, 

### I 30:18, 30:21, 30:23, : 31:3.31:9,31:10,

31:13, 31:14,31:16, 31:17, 31:20,31:21, 31:22,31:23, 32:3, 32:4. 32:6, 32:7, 32.14, 32:15, 32:17, 32:18,32:21,32:22. 32:24, 32:25. 33:1' 33:2.33:7, 33:8, 33:10, 33:14. 33:16, 33:17, 33:20,33:21, 33:22, 33:24, 33:25, 34:2, 34:10,34:12. 34:19,34:23.35:13, 35:19, 36:22, 36:24, 38:25, 37:1' 37:5, 37:7,37:8, 37:10. 37:11, 37:15.38:9. 38:11, 38:14.38:20, 38:21' 38:22, 38:25, 39:7.39:9, 39:13. 39:14,39:18, 39:20, 39:22. 40:18, 40:23. 41:5,41:10.41:12, 41:15,41:21,41:24, 42:13. 42:18,44:5. 44:12.44:13,44:14, 44:19, 45:6, 45:13. 45:15,45:18, 46:8, 46:11.46:12,46:15, : 46:17.46:18, 46:19,

47:3,47:16.48:12, 48:17. 48:20. 48:21' 48:22. 49:1,49:8, 49:12.49:14 

### N
N-4068!11· 2:14**name!~-** 6:8, 7:21, 8:14, 14:3. 14:11, 14:12, 19:25

natural (1J- 24:21 necessarily [11- 31:12

necossery [3]· 6:22. 15:2,46:1 nead[5)-31:11, : 32:11. 44:5, 44:6, : 48:23 NESHAP 111-21:25 NESHAPs 111- 25:22**nevert~J ~**  27:14 NEW!2J-1:1, 50:1 MW[i4J -10:9, 13:22, 16:6,23:24, 27.16, 28:24, 29:2. 29:3,29:4,30:11, 30:19. 30:25,32:10

NOWJ28) -1:18, 1:20, i 2:9, 2:11,2:13,2:15,

4:19.4:22.5:11,7:22, 10:3. 12:4, 15:5, 18:4, 19:2, 19:5,24:1. 30:4, 34:6, 34:25. 35:2. 38:2, 38:4.37:19, : 37:20. 40:2. 40:4, ' 42:22 newer111**~** 30:9**newspaperr11~** 19:2 next[<J-15:24, 16:1.30:18,37:16 NMAC[1DJ·1:5, 4:8, 4:9,6:13,6:18. 11:11. 11:13,11:14,13:16. 46:16

NMED[20] • 4:3, 5:3, 9:5, 9:17, 10:9. 12:14, : 20:20, 23:2, 44:4,

..... 146:15. 47:5**L-~~~~-** 

### KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS """113:25, 14:8, 14:12, ' 15:2, 15:9,15:12,

15:23, 19:6,20:5. 20:10.20:13,20:21, 20:24,40:6

NME0'$[1)- 9:22 NMSAI1J-47:14 nobody121- 38:21, 43:20

N01!2J- 20:12, 38:6 nonalr[2]·1B:18 nonsubstantive111**~** 16:15

normally[1J-44:25 NOTARY111- 50:19 NOthing 111- 40:25 nothing 111- 41:18 ootle&[14J- 7:12, 9:3. 14:6. 15:15. ' 18:23, 19:1, 19:3,

20:3. 44:7.44:8, 44:17,45:4.45:21. 46:5

notlcos

### m- 5:10. 13:22, 13:25, 14:7. 14·9, 19:8,22:13

notification !1]- 15:8

notllylng[1J

- 38:13 NovemberfiJ -1:17 NSPS 1121- 12:5, 13:23. 14:23, 14:24, 15:4. 15:10, 16:6. 16:12.17:8.18:1, 18:10. 40:20 NSPSeap[- 25:22 number[8J

- 6:1, 12:13, 12:14. 13:7. 25:17, 39:2,39:24. 49:15 i Number£2]-9:17, I so:2o 

### 5



# I oath[2J·

# ~23, 919
.. ' objected 111- 38:21

objections(1i- ' 17:11

objectlVOil]• 9:21 obtained 121- 7:5, 10:3 occurrence [11

- 20:15

October[i!J· 5:12, 38:7.44:15**OF!~** -1:1, 1:4, 1:14,8:12, 19:23, 50:1, 50:3**--'---~-------'** 110 Twelfth Street, Korthwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax {505) 243-3606offhandt1J-4019 offiC&J1J**~** 7:7 Ofllt<>[3)- 2:8, 2:8, 2:13

Olllcor{4J • 6:6, 6:10, 7:20,42:4

officer[JJ**~** 50:6 OllicOS!lJ-10:17 .,' often !31**~** 26:13,

34:21' 44:22

oli(4J -15:4, 23:23, i 24:21,24:24
! old J3J- 29:6, 30:7, : 30:13

. 1 • older111 • 28:25 one !131- 14:21. ' 23:7, 23:14, 31:4, i 32:10, 33:11,33:18,
! 33:20, 35:15,41:16, ' 47:12, 47:21

. 1 , one'Sf1J-24:12 On&S[2]·21;21, 21:22

0000111- 14:23 open 11l- 42:9 operator121 - 26:11, i 27:11

operatarst2J

- 27:18, 43:9

opinionJ3J- 17:25, 20:16, 43:12

opportunity [5J

- i 6:19, 7:15, 16:5, 17:7,

31:23

opposed 111- 47:3 option [3J- 22:5, 22:7, 33:1

oral 111-42:7 ord&r(2J- 32:19, 36:8

Ordor{1J- 5:8 order${1)- 6:21 organic;zJ**~** 25:3, 31:7

organizationsn - 16:3 orlginalt4J-16:8, 22:22, 23:7

originally (31 -14:18, 22:20, 45:24

otherwise (1J- 26:2 outcome 111- 24:12 outdated[1J -15:6 outgrowth !31

- 45:22, 45:25, 46:6

outllnod111 ·16:17 outreach {11- 9:11 overall 111- 31:.21 overslghtt2J- 10:16, 41:5 

# I ownors111 -16:2 i 34:10, 34:16, 34:21,**i----~---~** 37:14 

# L_ p**perm~**I"! -10:23.
PO!lfii1J· 22:12 PAGE l'l- 3:2 pogerI'I· 7:9 pages 121- 14:9, 24:22

par(1]- 29:1 paragraph[41

- 21:13,47:10, 47:18, 49:3

, paragraphs 111

- : 47:21 part17J·11'24, 17:4, 20:2, 27:3, 36:4, 43:7

Part£21]-12:4, 12:10, 12:16, 13:5, 14:5, 14:18, 14:23, 15:13, 15:17, 15:21, i 19:13, 19:16, 19:18, I 22:13, 22:15, 22:19,

42:6

partlcular[4J- ' 11.10, 15:4,33:11, : 43:11 i particularsttl
- i 40:21 : partlesj4J. 7:14,

15:15,50:14, 50:16

ports[2J -11:11, 14:4**Parts~J-11:14,** 13:18 PEACOCK**~•1-** 2:3, i 6:1, 34:2, 34:19, ' 35:13, 36:22, 36:25,

37:5, 37:8.37:11, 38:20, 38:22, 38:25, ' 39:20, 39:22, 40:18, : 40:23,41:10,41:12, i 41:15,41:21,41:24, ' 42:13,44:5,44:14,

44:19, 45:13,45:18, 46:8,48:12, 48:17, 46:19,47:3,48:12, 48:17,48:21,49:1, 49:8,49:14

per(1J- 31:5 perfonnn · 10:18 Performance 121 - 12:5, 30:5

performance 121 - : 25:3,41:2 '**period~!** -10:10,

17:5, 21:21

portodlcally (71· 10:5, 34:5, 34:8, 23:25, 24'3, 25:9, 25:11,27:20, 27:22, 27:24, 27:25, 28:2, 29.4, 30:20, 31:2, ' 31:4,31:15,31:17,

31:21, 31:25,32:2, 32:4. 32:8, 32:11' 32:15, 32:18. 32:23, 33:5, 33:10, 35:12

ponnils(4)· 24:2, 31:3,31:8,33:14

Permitting 111- 33:24

pormllllng!'l. 24:7, 26:13

poi'$0R**~I** · 6:25, 

### ! 23:21

personallyf2l**~** 44:19, 50:10

persons121- 6:19, 6:24

potltion 17J· 6:13, 

### ! 7:11,14:15,15:14,

. 24:19, 35:15, 38:6 phoner11- 7:9 plckotlng 111- 43:4 pipo(lj. 30:25 plaCOj2)- 18:11, '37:4**plan&t~:** • 23:16 i Plans 111**~** 9:10
! point**1~** - 20:9, • 20:11,25:12. 32:22,

1 35:6 pointed {1J • 44.6

, pollutan!j1J. 31:6 ' pollutants111

- 11 :4 Pollutant&!1J· 12:18 poorty 111. 22:18 portion111

- 11:17 posltlon&dnl10:21 posslble111- 6:2 possibly 121- 25:20, : 28:7 Postr11- 2:6 posted**1~** - 19:6, 35:24, 37:3

polentlallSI- 26:14, 26:15, 26:25, 27:12, 28:16.28:20

pounds 111 - 31:5 practicability111

- 17:22

prefert1J- 10:25 prnsentr21- 7:13, KATHY TOWNSEND COURT 120:3 presented 121

- 

## l 44:15,45:4**p~erve** [11- 6:22

pretty[2J • 32:16, 48:25

previous[1J
- 39:4 previously 1>1- 10:3, 13:18, 23:25 prlnled

### m· 14:9 Procedure 111· 6:20**procedureS!'~:-** 6:17

proceeding (21
- 50:7, 50:14

PROCEEDINGS 111- 1:14

Proeeedlngstil49:16

process121 - 36:5, 44:22

production (1]- 24:22

program rat 10:23, 

### ! 27:24, 31:4,31:21, ' 31:25,43:1,46:8 programs[4J
- 26:18, 26:25, 28:13, 43:16**prohlblt~i-41:1,** 

### ! 41:18 : promulgatedt2l w I 11:22, 13:20 ProofiOrderrtJ
- 4:20

proper [1l- 42:19 

### ! proposal(111- 9:22.

14:2, 17:3, 17:9, i 22:22,25:1,29:12, : 29:17,29:18, 30:1,

36:3

propose111- 47:10 PROPOSED111

- 1:4 Proposed 111-4:7 proposed !291- 4:9, 6c3, 9:12, 10:8, 11:12, 12:11. 12:13, 12:14,

1 : 13:11. 14:14, 14:18,

15:14, 17:25, 19:17, 20:11, 22:20,24:20, 

### i 25:1' 27:20, 35:19,
! 35:21' 35:22, 39:23, • 42:20,44:10, 45:22, : 48:15,47:6, 47:12 proposing (3)- 14:13, 18:14.23:1

Protectionf4l- 4:14, ' 4:16, 5'4, 8:19

protocoiS(1J • 25:6 9:15, 18:23,25:10 provided 121- 19:9,
! 20:12 :**provldos(~-11:16.** 141:17 :, provisions !11-

17:13 PUBUC11J·50:19 publiC{14J

- 7:6, 7:15, 9:10, 16:3, 16:13, 16:25, 17:5, 17:19, 16:7,18:23, ' 38:12,44:8,44:17 Publication:1J w 4'18

publicationJ4J

- 14:4, 16:22, 17:7, 

### ! 36:17

published**11~** • 4:11, 14:24,15:19, 19:1, 19:3, 22:24, 36:9, 36:14, 36:23, 37:1, 37:6, 38:15, 46:2

purchase 111- 26:12 i pul[11 26.24 I 

## r---··· 6

I 

### Q 

# r------1
quad 1"'1 -14:24, i 15:3, 15:4,15:10,
! 15:18, 16:6, 16:12,

16:22, 17:8, 17:10, i 22:4.22:14. 23:2,

23:4,23:15,23:17, 24:1,24:10, 24•16, 25:13,25:16,25:21, 26:3,27:15, 28:23, : 32:13, 33:4, 35:2, : 35:8,35:17, 35:19,

35:21,36:1,36:23, 37:13, 37:18, 36:16, 38:19, 39:2, 39:5, 39:6, 45:9, 45:24, '46:6 Quality**1~-** 7:23, 8:19,8:21,9:8, 17:14, 19:6, 33:24,47:13 quality (1J • 6:3, 6:12,925, 10:4, 11:1, 18:18

QUALITY (1]· 1:4 questioning111- 49:4

questions1121 - 7:25, 8:2, 19:20, 20:8, 21:3,23:9,23:12, 34:1,39:2,41:25, 42:1,42:2 

## I provlde[4J- 6:18,**-~~-~~~~-~** REPOHTERS 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

-**~ax** (505) 243-3606quite [tJ- 35 2

ran ttl

- 28:7 rather[4J -11:1, : 23:6, 36:18,40:14

,**road~~·** 40:24.

47:12

reading{1j- 44:16 ready 121- 48:4, 49:11

11>3llyISJ- 30:7, 30:13,31:11,32:9, 33:8,37:17,48:6

reason [21**~** 42:8, 42:21

reasonable(1} 6:19 reasonableness 111

- 17:22

reasons

### m - 20:12. 39:23, 42:6, 47:5, 47:6,48:19,49:11

Reas.ons 111- 5:8 receive 111- 44:25 received 111 -17:9 recent!31- 15:3. 18:1' 19:16 rGCommend [11- 19:13**record~~-** 7:6,8:15, 19:22, 19:25, 28·7, ' 42:9,42:10, 50:11 record-keeping (11- 26:7

recorded l2l- 7:3, 50:10

11>dUCOf1J- 25:11 roduclng f3J· 17:23, 27:18

reductions{21
- 18:15, 18:17

refer 121- 29:7, 40:14 refarencersJ-12:2, 12:9, 13:4, 16:11, 18:1,23:4,40:1,49:4

roferl1>d[41 11:14, 12:5, 12:21' 14:24

referring 111 - 40:14 11>gardlng**~!** -15:8, 48:1

Region I!J-10:17 Reglstef!21l- 4:11. 4:19. 5:10, 11:23. 13:21' 13:22, 14:4, 14:7,14:25, 15:19, 16:22, 19:3, 19:5, regulationsf17J**~** 6:3,6:12, 9:25, 10:10, 11:1, 11:10. 11:15, 

### ! 13:14, 13:23, 17:16,

18:12, 18:13, 18:25, 19:17, 34:16, 37:14, 40:5

REGULAnONS111- 1:4

Regulations(11- 11:19 regulatol}' 1n • 9:10. 9:12, 10:8, 11:3, 14:14, 18:5, 39:11

. Regulatol}'**~~-** 5:9, I 20:14 

# I ralated (11- 50:13

relates 111- 15:3 ' rolatlVOf1J· 50:15 released[1J-16:13 relevantJ3J- 8:23, 11:22, 13:19

reUance(t]-10:15 REMEMBERED 111

- 1:16 replace ttl- 49:4 replaced 121· 30:14, 30:21

replacement 111-
! 30:19
! replacements !21- • 30:16,30:19 i REPORTER[1J·

48:16

reporten11- 7:6 Reporters111 7:4 n>ports 111- 39:15 representrtJ-7:21 request[1J- 22:20, 24:12,34:7,34:9, 35:16, 37:16, 42:5

requested 1'1 • 13:17, 22:22. 22:25, 23:7

requests121 -10:5. 34:5

require 141 ·17:14, 18:25,30:19, 31:1 requil1>d [.ll-18:9, 18:20, 47:18

requirement (11
- 45:3 requ1rements [flJ

- 11:6,18:3, 18:19, 18:21,24:10, 24:20, : 25:19, 32:20, 33:4,

1 33:9, 35:8,39:11,

47:8, 47:13.47:19 ' 47:24,48:10 requires 111- 30:20 research (iJ- 30:2 researched [11
- 24:17

resourc&St1J-10:18 respect [3]-13:13. 15:13, 15:16

respectfully !11- 42:5

responS&S(1J- 47:2 r&st[1j-43:16 rosultm-11:4, 11:7. 16:20, 16:25, 18:5, 18:6

resume(3J**~** 4:4,9:2, 20:2

Resume{11- 4:5 retain 111-41:5 retains 121- 10:16, 40:4

retroactive(1J • 28:25

review[4l- 9:9, 16:6, 16:10, 17:8

reviewedf11- 47:24 revise111**~** 31:14 roviHdJSJ- 4:7, 13:23, 38:1' 38:2, 38:3.38:4

revision [51· 11:12, 13:11, 15:16, 22:13, 38:8

revisionSf4J- 10:8, 14:13, 46:16, 47:12

RITAJ3J· 3:4, 8:7, 19:23 Rita 15J- 3:7, 4:5, 7:24,20:1,23:13

rooft2J- 26:22 Roomt•J-1:19**nd&{16J~** 11:21, 11:25. 12:13, 12:14, : 12:20, 13:7, 14:11, : 14:19, 16:17, 16:20.

16:24, 17:1,21:18, 25:7. 36:3, 28:14, 37:19, 37:20

rulemaktng [61

- 6:13,6:17, 11:7, 14:22, 15:9, 18:25

rules [21) • 10:6, 10:9.10:13, 10:14, 11:2.11:6, 11:7, KATHY TOWNSEND COCRT 11:18, 11:22, 12:2, 1112:12, 14:20, 15:1, 13:9. 13:10, 13:13, 15:21, 16:23,23:2, 13:19, 16:10, 19:16, 35:16, 38:10,38:14, 21:20, 34:18, 36:5, ' 44:11,45:9 37:24,44:16**~** SetJ4]- 6.17, 25:2,

RulosJ'l

- 6:20 30:5, 45:24 Ryan 111- 23:10 setsr21- 11:25, 25:5 RYAN £541. 2:5, shaiiJ4J· 40:25, 23:11,23:20, 24:14, 41:18,44:8,44:16

1 25:14, 25:24, 26:4, sheet111· 36:14

26.8, 26:17, 27:5, : shorthand 111- 27:8, 27:10, 27:21, : 50:10 

### ! 28:1, 28:4, 28:10. sideJ1J- 27'7
· 28:14,28:17, 28:22, sign111- 36:13 : 29:10, 29:15, 30:8, signed151- 7:8,

30:10, 30:12, 30:16, 35:24,36:12, 36:19, 30:18,30:23.31:9, 37:3 31:13.31:16,31:20, sil&ncepl-7:9 31:22, 32:3, 32:6, slmllar[41

- 7:24, 32:14, 32:17,32:21, 18:10, 18:20,47:11 32:24, 33:7, 33:10, similaritlee 111- : 33:16, 33:20.33:22, 11:15 : 33:25,42:18, 44:13, simplet1J- 24:4 : 45:6,46:11,46:15, simplifiodl21· 

# I**~**

# '""'·<OW, '""" 12 simplifies 111- 33:8 Simultanaous 111- 

### S 47:2



### ·----11 slmultaneous[1J**~** 1**Santa~~** - 1:20, 2:9, 30'17 : 2:15 sitaJ2J -19:7,38:12

satisfied 121- 47:20, Smalli11- 20:14 48:10 smaiiJ4J·20:18,

satlslyJ;!l

_18,2, 25:20, 31:19, 43:9 47:13 soclai(1J 17:20

saw 111**~47:11** someone 121**~** 26"10, science [11· 8:25 30:24 scribbling [1]
- 48:22 ; sometimes IllsecondJSJ- 21:13, 34'24 21:15,23:18,46:20, sorry)4J· 21 '12· 46:21 22:18,41:8,47:1

seconded 111- 46:22 sortpJ- 36: 13 sectlon [3J- 33:13, soughtl11 -10:3 41:3,41:14 sounds[1J- 49:13

Sectionr 41 _5:6, source[J]-10:22, 12·1, 12:8, 34:15 26'14· 29'2 sections f4J- 12:10, Source [3J -12:4, 13:5, 13:16,40:24 12:18, 30:5 see 1 31 _24:11, sourceS(14J- 10:22, 32:17,43:6 11:8, 17:21,17:24,

See 111 _40,6 23:25, 24:3, 25:11, sensa[1J-29:5 26:2,30:11,31:18, sanlfS]- 15,19, 32:7,35:8,37:20, 15:24, 20:15, 22:3, 40'3 38,15 Spanish 111-19:4

sentence [11**~** 39:25 speclflcrn- 9:24. i**senteneest1J~48:7** 11:17,12:4,21:21, ! September{14J- 21:22, 33:11,48:1 

# I specifically111

- 4:13,4:24, 10:11, 13:14 REPORTERS-···· 

### 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 

### 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606 

### 7speciflod 121- 11:23, 13.21 spot(1J- 33:11 SS[t{• 50:2 Sl[\]-2:14 staffltJ-10·18 stakeholder121

- 15:11, 15:2 stakeholders[9J

- 15:20. 16:5, 16:9. 17:7, 17:11, 19:10, 23:24, 38:16, 43:3

standttJ-21:2 standard 111- 41:2 Standards[3!·12:5, 12:17, 30:5standardS[11J10:4, 10:7, 10:21, 12:10,12:21, 13:24, 25:2,40:1,40:3, 40:20, 41:20

state [1SJ- 8:14, 10:6. 10:13. 11:16, 13:10, 18:13, 19:15, 19:25,23:16, 24:8, 27:3,31:7.48:7

STATE121-1:1, 50:1 Stale!'!· 1:19,9:9, 34:5

Statement[1J- 5:6 statement [€i

- 20:11, 39:23, 47:5, 47:6,48:18,49:10

statements(1J- 42:3 statesf'l

- 9:25. 11:21, 13:19

statutory[oJ -12:6, 13:2, 18:2, 40:9, 40:15,47:8

stilll'l

- 22:16, 38:18,39:6

storager1o1- 24:21, 24:23,25:4, 27:16, 28:24, 28:25, 29:3,
1 : 29:5, 29:6, 33:11

streamlined !2J**~** : 32:1 stn>ots [11- 43:4 stuffIt!- 39:3 subject1101

- 6:24, 45:24 Subpart111 14:23 subsectlon !Zl**~** 40:25. 41:18

substance**1~** - ' 16:20,23:15,23:21, : 24:16, 45:7

substantivo !4J**~** 17:6, 37:22,40:3, 45:10

substantively I'll**~** 45:2

sudden[1]·31:1 sufficiency [11- 45:21

suggest[1]- 49:2 Suite 111- 2:14 summary [1]**~** 24:20 • suppor!i>J- 42:16, 1 44:1,44:4

, suspendersr11- : 45:7

swornf31**~** 8:5, 8:8, 50:9

systemp]-18:15 

### T table{1] -14:2 talksi>J- 22:12, 1 25:1, 29:8

,**tank~~-** 26:20. : 26:21, 27:2. 27:7, : 27:9. 29:5, 30:20. I 3021

tanks1221- 24:21,

.,. 24:23, 25:4, 25:7,

26:12,26:18,27:17,

. 28:24,29:1, 29:3.

29:6, 29:9, 29:11, 30:7, 30:9, 30:13, 31:7,31:10, 33:11, 33:12

TanksltJ- 26:19 technlcalt3J- 7:13, 17:22,20:3 Technology 111- 12:17 

# Ia, 915 9·18 ·9····1s ' ' '
. ' . ' ' '

1 20:3,22:12, 23:14,

34:4, 40:7, 40:8, 

## i 40:14, 42:7. 43:10. : 46:4,48:1, 50:8,

1 50:10, 50:11

t.. tlng 111

- 26:7 : textpJ-14:7

THEt>J -1:4,21:6, : 48:16

therefore**t~l-** 39:4 tboy'VOf\f• 32:15 thinking 111-47:16 three 121- 8:22, 47;8 thresholds [21

- 25:23. 28:15

throughout 111- 17:5 nmr'l- 46:22 timely(1J- 35:3 llMOTHY[11- 2:4 title 121- 12:4, 14:6 tilled :11- 12:16 T0[1[·1:4 today**1~** • 7:23, 9:19,11:11,17:2, 34:4, 47:9, 48:1, 48:5

todoy's [11- 29:12 tonspJ-31:5 total[1)·14:9 toward I'I- 44:4 Townsend£11- 7:4 transcribed(1J- 7:3 TRANSCRIPT 111 • 1:14 transcript[4J· 7:5, 48:14, 50:9, 50:11

transported [1)**~** t 24:25 ' trlgger[11· 36:16

triggered 121- 25·16. 31'19

true111

- 50:11 try [1)- 43:7 trying [21- 28:25, 48:11

turn[2J-6:5, 42:12 twenty 111

- 8:22 twenty-three [1]- 8:22 29:10,29:15. 31:9, 32:3,44:18,48:21, 49:1 : unanimoUS]1J-47:4 ; Und8f[19]- 6:23, 1 9:19. 9:23. 10:4, : 11:18, 12:7,17:15,

. 18:20, 19:16, 24:1,

24:3,25:18,25:19, 27:25,31:4, 31:8, 32:13,41:2,48:10

unfortunately !11- 16:14

University 111- 9:1 unless111- 30:14 upl"]-23:5, 29:1, 36:21, 37:25, 38:23, 43:1, 44:25, 49;3

update [3)- 10:6, 34:6, 34:15

updates 111- 24:20 updatingi'l

- 27:17. 37:14

usc[41

- 40:10, 40:11,49.5,49:6

USCA 111- 5:6 

# w
walt121- 29:25, 35:4 wants 1'1- 43:19, 43:20, 43:21

ways 121

- 28:18, 33:17

WEAVER[56J· 3:4,

. 8:7,8:12, 12:24, 13:1,

21:12,21:15.21:18, 22:2.22:10,22:17, 24:18, 25:16, 25:25, 26:5,26:13,26:18, 27:6, 27:9, 27:19, 27:22, 28:2, 28:5, 28:12,28:15, 28:18, 29:18,29:22,29:25, 30:3,30:14, 31:3, 31:10,31:14,31:17, 31:21, 31:23, 32:4, 32:7,32:15,33:1, 33:14,33:17,33:21, 34:10, 35:19,36:24, 37:1,37:7, 37:10, 38:14, 38:21, 39:7, 39:9,39:13,41:5**Woavoq1~-** 3:5,

# r~"~"" value [1J

- 17:20 variOUS[1l**~** 27:7 veh1CI&[1J -11:16 wrslon [9]- 15:3, 15:6. 15:14,32:1. 32:2, 36:1,36:8, 36:12, 37:24 ..-, 4:4, 4:6, 4:24, 7:24, 8:1,8:14, 8:16, 19:20, 23:19. 24:15,34:4**web~~-** 19:6, 38:12

weeks 111- 36:8 wolghli1J- 47:15 welcome [11- 39:21 welfare 121- 17:19, 18:7**versionS[1J~** 14:15 Vice111- 6:6 Vic&-Chalrp{- 6:6 viewable [1]- 7:7 volatile [21

- 25:3, 31:6

volatility 111- 26:20 Volkerdlng 121 • 6:6, 6:8

VOLKERDING [231- 2:4, 6:7, 8:4, 8:10, whatsoever(1J19:11 wholop1- 31:24 wldely[1i- 35:25 witnesses [4J**~** 7:18, 8:5, 50:8, 50:12

WITNESSES 111

- 3:3 WOI'fYf2!-31:12, 32:9 i wrne 111-40:10 

# I Written 111. 4:6

written 141- 9:15, 

### 8

7:1,9:13, 25:13, temporary111**~** 24:25 two [OJ· 11:13, 23:11, 29:9,34:20, 35:14, 35:17 ' 20:22,21:3,21:7, 23:9, 34:1,38:23, 39:1,39:8,39:10, 39:17, 39:19, 39:21, 42:1,42:8,44:18, i 9:18, 22:18, 42:7 ---l 25:21, 26:2, 26:7, tend(2j- 44:24,45:5 27:15,39:5,39:6 termt1J-42:19

subjectsf2l- 17:21, terms 111- 45:20 45:10
1 . teslf41- 25:5. 26:10. submit!':- 38:3, 45:21,46:7 48:5 , tesUfled {11- 6:9 typoI']- 25:6 

## -u----.... 44:24.45:17.46:22
.

. 49:13 -----1 submitted [3)- 20:2. : Testlmony(1i -4:6 um-huml15J- 25:24, 38:1, 44:21 1 testimony !22l- 26:4, 27:8, 27:21, voluntarily [1J28'19

votei1J- 47:4 Lsubpar!f21-17:8,
.... 

# I6'23·6:24,7:1,7:13, 

### i 28:1,28:4.28:17, KATHY TOI'INSEND COURT REPOR':'ERS 

### y

,. year!2!·27:1, 31:5 : years 121- 8:22, I 34:20



### 110 Twelfth Street, Northwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 243-5018

- Fax (505) 243-3606