# State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan

For the Year 2012

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Division Air Assessment Section


## Final August 1, 2012

### Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION

............................................................................................................................... .4 2.0 ADEQ PROGRAM AND NETWORK DESCRIPTIONS ...............................................................6 2.1 NAAQS Compliance Network ..........................................................................................................6 2.2 State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Maintenance Area Network ...................................................7
2.3 Source Oriented Network ..................................................................................................................7
2.4 NCore Network

............................................................................................................................... ...8 2.5 Meteorological Network ....................................................................................................................8 2.6 Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) ................................................................8 2.7 National Air Toxics Trend Sites (NATTS) .......................................................................................9 2.8 Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) ................................................................................................9 2.9 Class I Area Network and IMPROVE Program ..............................................................................10 2.10 AIRNow Reporting ........................................................................................................................10
2.11 Urban Haze Network .....................................................................................................................10
2.12 E-BAM Network of PM Special Purpose Monitors 2.5 ..................................................................11
2.13 Arizona / Mexico Border Network ................................................................................................11
3.0 MONITORING NETWORK EVALUATION ................................................................................12 3.1 Site Closures

............................................................................................................................... .....12
3.2 New Sites

............................................................................................................................... ..........13 3.3 Instrument Changes .........................................................................................................................13 3.4 Summary of Network Changes ........................................................................................................15 4.0 ADEQ MONITORING NETWORKS .............................................................................................17 4.1 PM Monitoring Network Requirements 2.5 ......................................................................................17

4.2 PM Monitoring Network Requirements 10 .......................................................................................20

4.3 O Monitoring Network Requirements 3 ...........................................................................................24 4.4 Pb Monitoring Network Requirements ............................................................................................25

4.5 SO Monitoring Network Requirements 2 .........................................................................................26

4.6 NO Monitoring Network Requirements 2 ........................................................................................27 4.7 CO Monitoring Network Requirements ..........................................................................................28 4.8 PAMS Monitoring Network Requirements .....................................................................................28 4.9 NCore Monitoring Network Requirements .....................................................................................30 4.10 SIP Monitoring Network Requirements ........................................................................................31 4.11 Source Compliance Monitoring Network Requirements ...............................................................32

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 24.12 Class I Visibility Network .............................................................................................................34 4.13 Urban Haze Monitoring Network ..................................................................................................35 4.14 Meteorology Monitoring Network ................................................................................................36 5.0 MONITORING PLAN QUALITY ASSURANCE .........................................................................38 5.1 The Quality System .........................................................................................................................38 5.2 Measurement Quality Checks – Precision and Bias Measurements ................................................40 5.3 Calculations and Reporting ..............................................................................................................43 5.4 ADEQ AQD Audit Responsibilities ................................................................................................43 5.5 EPA Audit Responsibilities .............................................................................................................44

APPENDIX A DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVI ATIONS .....................................................................46

APPENDIX B N ETWORK MAPS........................................................................................................ .48

APPENDIX C CURRENT MONITORS BY PROGRAMS OR NETWORK .......................................60

APPENDIX D SITE INFORM ATION DATA TABLES ......................................................................90

APPENDIX E 2012 EPA M ONITORING SC HEDULE .....................................................................150
APPENDIX F DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT .................................................................151
APPENDIX G ADEQ PM 2.5 SAMPLE FREQUENCY CLARIFICATIONS AND REQUEST FOR
SAMPLING FREQUE NCY REDUC TIONS...............................................................167

APPENDIX H PROPOSED CHANGES TO SO 2 AND PM 10 NETWORKS IN MIAMI AND
HAYDEN, AZ ..............................................................................................................171
APPENDIX I CRITERIA POLLUTANT MINIMUM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS.............180

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 31.0 INTRODUCTION

This document fulfills the obligation, under the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, Section 58.10(a), requiring Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) to complete and submit to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) an annual network monitoring plan for the year 2012.

This plan informs EPA (Region 9) of the monitoring activities ADEQ has implemented since July 2011, as well as activities ADEQ will undertake July 2012, through December 2013. However, some changes may occur after the plan is published and approved due to unforeseen events at monitoring sites, funding changes, or changes in EPA monitoring requirements. Data from ADEQ's monitors are reported to EPA's Air Quality System (AQS) database and to AIRNow. In 40 CFR 51, EPA requires states to create, submit, and adopt State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to address the various issues and responsibilities involved with creating and implementing air quality programs. Subpart J of Part 51 specifies that Part 58 Subpart B contains the requirements for establishing air quality surveillance systems to monitor ambient air quality.

Air quality surveillance systems consist of networks of monitors at carefully-chosen physical locations referred to as sites or stations. Some of the networks, sites, and monitors are:

 State and Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS)

 National Core multipollutant monitoring stations (NCore)

 Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS)

 Chemical Speciation Network (CSN)

 National Air Toxics Trends Sites (NATTS)

 Special Purpose Monitors (SPM)

 Urban Haze monitoring sites

 Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments (IMPROVE)

 AIRNow information sites

 Source-oriented monitoring sites operated independently by permittees (Industry)

 Meteorological sites

This Annual Monitoring Network Plan identifies the purpose(s) of each monitor and provides evidence that both the siting and the operation of each monitor meet the requirements in 40 CFR Part 58 appendices A, C, D, and E as follows:

 Appendix A – Quality Assurance Requirements for SLAMS, SPMs, and Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Air Monitoring

 Appendix C – Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Methodology

 Appendix D – Network Design Criteria for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring

 Appendix E – Probe and Monitoring Path Siting Criteria for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring

Results of the annual network review and planning are used to determine how well the networks are achieving their required air monitoring objectives, how well they meet data users’ needs, and how they

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 4should be modified (through term ination of existing st ations, relocation of stations, establishment of new stations, monitoring of additional parameters, and/or changes to the sampling schedule) in order to continue to meet their objectives and data needs. The annual network review and planning are performed for the purpose of improving the networks and ensuring that they provide adequate, representative, and useful air quality data.

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 52.0 ADEQ PROGRAM AND NETWORK DESCRIPTIONS

ADEQ operates ambient air quality equipment for a variety of Federal and State monitoring programs. Detailed descriptions of the equipment deployed for each monitoring program are presented in Appendix C. The equipment is grouped by monitoring program or network to easily compare instrument specifics across the networks. Appendix D lists the information about each of ADEQ's current monitoring sites (or those recently closed), including those sites which ADEQ shares with other agencies or serves as the local site operator. General information about the monitoring programs that ADEQ participates in is described in the following sections.

2.1 NAAQS Compliance Network

The largest comp liance network in Arizona consists of monitoring sites operated for the purpose of demonstrating compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for the “criteria” pollutants: carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ), sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), ozone (O 3 ), particulate matter (PM 10 and PM 2.5 ), and lead (Pb). The criteria pollutants are measured using instruments that have been certified by the EPA as Federal Reference Methods (FRM) or Federal Equivalent Methods (FEM). 40 CFR Part 58 speci fies the minimum requirements for determining NAAQS compliance including the fo llowing network and site criteria:

 Number and types of monitors required per Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) by pollutant

 Objectives and spatial scales

 Sampling frequency

 Collocation

 Special NCore-related requirements

 Meteorology

 Probe location and other restrictions within a site

 Periodic performance evaluations

 Quality Assurance

 Data reporting

2.1.1 Changes to the NAAQS

Pb – In November 2008, EPA revised the Pb NAAQS from 1.5 μ g/m 3 to 0.15 μ g/m 3 . New requirements for the placement of monitors were added: (1) near Pb sources (by January 1, 2010) having annual ambient air Pb emissions that are expected to exceed one ton and (2) in non-source urban areas (by January 1, 2011) with populations greater than 500,000. In December 2009, EPA proposed revisions to these monitoring requirements. In December 2010, the EPA finalized the Pb monitoring requirements which required Pb monitoring near sources with Pb emissions greater than 0.5 tons. The rule also clarified that monitoring near airports was only requi red at select locations. Additionally, the final rule adjusted the non-source monitoring requirement to be limited to NCore sites that are located within CBSAs with populations of 500,000 or greater. NCore Pb monitors and source-oriented Pb monitors associated with the new 0.5 to one ton emissions threshold were to be operational one year from the date of the final rule.

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 6O 3 – After several delays, in September 2011, the EPA indicated that they would uphold their original 2008 decision to set the eight-hour NAAQS at 0.075 ppm . The EPA has also indicated that the proposed monitoring rule issued in July 2009, would likely not move forward on several fronts. The EPA has unofficially stated that the only part of th e proposed rule that may be implemented would be the changes in ozone seasons. As a result, unlike previous network plans, ADEQ will not include the 2009 proposed monitoring rule in their network plan evaluation for 2012.

SO 2 – In June 2010, EPA revised the primary SO 2 standard by establishing a new one-hour standard at a level of 75 parts per billion (ppb). The new form is the three-year average of the 99 th percentile of the annual distribution of daily maximum one-hour con centrations. It is also revoking the two existing primary standards of 140 ppb evaluated over 24 hours and the 30 ppb evaluated over a year. Additionally, the EPA required changes to data reporting requirements to include reporting the maximum five minute concentration for each hour in addition to the hourly averaged concentrations. ADEQ began collecting and processing hourly maximum five minute SO 2 concentrations in July and August, 2010. New monitoring requirements for placement of monitors were also issued, and monitors must be operational by January, 2013. The new monitoring requirements do not result in any SO 2 network changes for ADEQ, as population oriented monitors will be covered by Maricopa and Pima County agencies and the source oriented monitors have been established for years.

NO 2 – In January 2010, EPA set a new one-hour standard for NO 2 of 100 ppb. EPA is retaining the annual standard of 53 ppb. The form of the standard is the three-year average of the 98 th percentile of the annual distribution of daily maximum one-hour aver age concentrations. New monitoring requirements were established including near roadway monitors in urban areas, additional urban monitors in large urban areas, and monitors in areas with populations susceptible to NO 2 related health effects. The new monitoring requirements are not expected to result in any NO 2 network changes for ADEQ, as population oriented monitors and near roadway monitors will be operated by Maricopa and Pima County agencies.

CO – In August 2011, EPA finalized network design changes that would place CO monitors at a subset of near-road NO 2 monitoring sites. ADEQ will not be required to and does not anticipate creating any near-road NO 2 sites. Two sites are anticipated in Maricopa County and one in Pima County. ADEQ’s CO monitoring efforts continue to focus on CO trace-lev el monitoring at the JLG Supersite as part of the NCore network.

2.2 State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Maintenance Area Network

ADEQ maintains several air m onitoring sites for the purpose of tracking compliance in areas that arecurrently not attaining one or more of the NAAQS and in areas where the NAAQS has been met, but ongoing demonstration of compliance is required. Monitoring requirements for these areas are described in their associated SIPs.

2.3 Source Oriented Network

Historically, ADEQ has required several of the major point sources in the state to conduct am bient monitoring for criteria pollutants, primarily PM 10 and SO 2 , in and around the permitted facility. These monitors constitute a subset of the compliance monitoring network described above. ADEQ activities

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 7with respect to this network have been limited to perform ance audits and review of ambient data summaries submitted by the individual sources. Recently, however, SIP support has required the submittal of data by some sources to the AQS, including review of quality assurance documents kept by the sources to support their ambient monitoring programs. ADEQ continues to work with the permitted facilities to obtain all ambient air quality data that are required to be reported to AQS. In 2012, a proposal was submitted to ASARCO and Freeport-McMoRan suggesting changes in the source SO 2 monitoring at their facilities at Hayden and Miami, respectively. These suggested changes involved ADEQ assuming additional monitoring responsibilities. Additional information is provided in the Source Compliance Monitoring Network Requirements section.

2.4 NCore Network

EPA describes the nationwide NCore network composed of approxim ately 70 urban and 20 rural sites as a multipollutant network that integrates several advanced measurement systems for particles, pollutant gases, and meteorology. Some of the missions of the NCore network are:

 Tracking long-term trends of criteria and non-criteria pollutants;

 Support for long-term health assessments that contribute to ongoing reviews of the NAAQS;

 Support to scientific studies ranging across technological, health, and atmospheric process disciplines; and

 Support to ecosystem assessments recognizing that national air quality networks benefit ecosystem assessments and, in turn, benefit from data specifically designed to address ecosystem analyses.

As required under 40 CFR Part 58.13, ADEQ’s NCore site (JLG Supersite) was operational by January 1, 2011. In addition to the above missions and the NCore monitoring requirements set forth in the CFR, ADEQ will use the JLG Supersite to test new technologies that may be adopted in various ADEQ monitoring networks. Examples would include adva nced communications and serial data collection, remote span checks and calibrations, high sensitivity instrumentation, and instruments that monitor pollutants that may be added to the current CFR requirements. Additional NCore information is available from the EPA website: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/ncore/index.html

2.5 Meteorological Network

ADEQ collects meteorological data at sites throughout the state to support the analysis of ambient air quality data and to provide support for exceptional event reporting. Meteorological measurements are also required for the NCore and PAMS networks. ADEQ currently meets the meteorological monitoring requirements for the NCore and PAMS networks. ADE Q intends to add meteorological instrumentation to most of ADEQ’s monitoring sites that are not currently equipped. Additions will occur as time and funding permits. A priority list has been created to sequence the installations as materials and manpower become available.

2.6 Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS)

Section 182(c)(1) of the 1990 Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendm ents requires the Administrator to promulgate rules for enhanced monitoring of O 3 that includes concurrent monitoring of ozone, oxides of nitrogen (NOx), total reactive nitrogen (NOy, speci ated volatile organic compounds (VOC), carbonyls,

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 8CO, and meteorology to obtain com prehensive and representative O 3 data. Immediately following the promulgation of those rules, the affected states began to implement a program to improve ambient monitoring activities related to the precursors of ozone. Each SIP for the affected areas must contain commitments to implement the appropriate ambient monitoring network for such air pollutants. The subsequent revisions to 40 CFR 58 (1993) required st ates to establish PAMS as part of their SIP monitoring networks in O 3 non-attainment areas classified as serious, severe, or extreme. The principal reasons for requiring the collection of additional ambient air pollutant and meteorological data are the widespread non-attainment of the O 3 NAAQS and the need for a more comprehensive air quality database for O 3 and its precursors. ADEQ operates three PAMS sites, JLG Supersite (type 2), Queen Valley (type 3), and VEI (meteorological) to represent the Phoenix metropolitan area.

EPA has recently assembled a workgroup to evaluate the current PAMS program and consider the possible re-invention of the PAMS program. The scope of the evaluation was extensive and includedPAMS objectives, network design, methods, and quality assurance. ADEQ participated in the PAMS reinvention process and will continue to follow this activity closely to be aware of possible future implications for the ADEQ network.

2.7 National Air Toxics Trend Sites (NATTS)

The NATTS network was designed to monitor and record the concentrations of certain air toxics on a national scale. Data f rom EPA’s national monitoring activities are used to estimate national average concentrations for these air toxics compounds and to detect trends. Using this information, EPA, states, and local agencies can estimate changes in the risks of human exposure. These changes can then be used to support changes in environmental policy. As part of the National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA) process, ambient air quality data are used to assess the national toxics inventory and long-term hazardous air pollutant (HAP) trends. ADEQ accepted federal funding and responsibility for this program in 2003. The ADEQ JLG Supersite is the designated NATTS site for Phoenix.

2.8 Chemical Speciation Network (CSN)

The CSN was established to meet the regulatory requirem ents for monitoring speciated PM 2.5 to determine the chemical composition of these particles. The purpose of the CSN is to determine, over a period of several years, trends in concentration levels of selected ions, metals, carbon species, and organic compounds in the PM 2.5 samples collected at select sites throughout the country. The program began in 1999 with 54 Speciation Trends Network (STN) sites across the nation located primarily in or near larger MSAs

. The network has increased to around 200 sites nationwide. Monitoring at JLG Supersite includes one STN speciation sampler and two IMPROVE samplers as part of the CSN network. The collocated IMPROVE samplers provide precision information for the IMPROVE network and are used for comparison of the speciation results from both programs. In 2009, a URG 3000N carbon sampler was added and data from that sampler was then used in place of the data from the Met One SASS carbon channel. This substitution was made as part of a national program designed to make the characteristics of the CSN carbon method match the IMPROVE carbon method more closely.

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 92.9 Class I Area Network and IMPROVE Program

Visibility monitoring networks track impairment in specified national parks and wilderness areas. These parks and wilderness areas are called federally mandatory Class I areas (CIAs) and were designated based on an evaluation required by Congress in the 1977 federal CAA Amendments. The evaluation, which was performed by the United States Forest Service (USFS) and National Park Service (NPS), reviewed the areas of parks and national forests which were designated as wilderness before 1977, were more than 6,000 acres, and have visual air quality as an important resource for visitors. Of the 156 Class I Areas designated across the nation, 12 are located in Arizona. Nine sites are located in USFS areas and three in NPS areas. EPA initiated the nationally-operated IMPROVE monitoring network in 1987 whose purpose is to characterize broad regional trends and visibility conditions using monitoring data collected in or near Class I Wilderness Areas across the United States. In addition to the eleven Class 1 sites (two were combined in the past) ADEQ added six other IMPROVE sites identified as Protocol sites in the IMPROVE table in Appendix C. Refer to section 4.12 and the map in Appendix B for additional details regarding ADEQ’s Class I Visibility and IMPROVE networks.

Due to budget constraints, ADEQ shut down the Class I nephelometer network in 2010. Over a decade of data were collected at several of these nephelometer sites. In early 2011, a draft summary report was written which summarizes the nephelometer data that were collected since 1997. The report provides comparisons of calculated visibility impairment between the IMPROVE aerosol monitors and collocated nephelometers. Summaries and trends in visibility data are also presented within the report, as well as meteorological data summaries in the form of wind roses. This report is meant to serve as a final data summary for the Class I Nephelometer network. Information from this report may be utilized in the future if further modifications are needed to the Arizona Class I visibility network.

2.10 AIRNow Reporting

ADEQ has recently renewed efforts to provide data to the AIRNow system and has been successful in transf erring some data to AIRNow via their new AQCSV file format. Data currently being submitted to AIRNow on a near-real time basis include, ozone, continuous PM 10 and PM 2.5 , and SO 2 data. ADEQ will continue their efforts in expanding their data submission to AIRNow to support air quality forecasting and near-real time data reporting. Appendix C contains an indication of whether data from specific monitors and sites are submitting data to AIRNow.

2.11 Urban Haze Network

Historically, ADEQ operated an urban haze network in the Phoenix and Tucson metropolitan areas. The purpose of the networks is to provide policy-m akers and the public with information regarding urban haze levels, track short-term and long-term urban haze trends, assess source contributions to urban haze, and better evaluate the effectiveness of air pollution control strategies on urban haze. Equipment used to evaluate urban visibility includes transmissometers, nephelometers, particulate monitors, and digital camera systems. A wealth of urban visibility related data and information have been collected for more than a decade in both the Phoenix and Tucson area. In 2010, due to budget cuts, this non-mandatory program was reduced to operate in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area only. This network includes digital cameras, nephelometers, and transmissometer. Additional details regarding ADEQ’s Urban Haze Network can be found in section 4.13.

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 102.12 E-BAM Network of PM 2.5 Special Purpose Monitors

The current network of E-BAM continuous particulat e special purpose monitors (listed in Table 2.12-1) is composed of lightweight, portable monitors typi cally enclosed in self-contained, environmentally sealed containers. They can be battery or solar pow ered for operation at sites without fixed electrical power. E-BAMs continuously sample and report particulate concentrations. Data are sampled every second and concentrations recorded every minute. E-BAM monitors have been used by many agencies, particularly in the western United Sates, to provide continuous, real-time particulate concentration data that are useful for making informed smoke management decisions related to prescribed burns. E-BAM instruments are used for special purpose monitoring only. They are not classified as FRMs or FEMs and may not be used to demonstrate NAAQS compliance. ADEQ uses these monitors primarily to monitor populated areas that could be impacted by prescribed burns and wildfires. Historically, ADEQ’s E-BAM monitors have been configured to measure particles ≤ 10 microns in diameter (PM 10 ). To get a better understanding of smoke impacts in these smaller communities, ADEQ changed the configuration in 2011 of these monitors to measure only particles PM 2.5 . Hourly data from the E-BAM monitors can be viewed at: http://www.phoenixvis.net/PPMmain.aspx

.

Table 2.12-1 Location of E-BAM Monitors Site Name Address Flagstaff Middle School 755 N. Bonito, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Prescott College AQD 336 Grove Ave., Prescott, AZ 86301 Sedona Fire Station AQD 310 Forest Road, Sedona, AZ, 86336 Show Low 561 E. Deuce of Clubs, Show Low, AZ 85901 Springerville 323 S. Mountain Ave., Springerville, AZ 85936 Verde Ranger Station 300 E. Highway 260, Camp Verde, AZ 86322

2.13 Arizona / Mexico Border Network

Historically, ADEQ has been involved in ambient air quality m onitoring along the Arizona / Mexico border. Initially, ADEQ conducted particulate monitoring on both sides of the border. In 2008, due to changes in federal regulations regarding documentation needed to cross the border, ADEQ staff were not permitted to cross the border into Mexico. As a result, ADEQ’s direct involvement with ambient air quality monitoring in Mexico was reduced. In its place, ADEQ relied upon contractors to perform the monitoring on the Mexico side of the border. Due to recent budget constraints by both ADEQ and EPA, this program could no longer be funded. As a result, the Agua Prieta Fire Station, Sonora Nogales Fire Station, and San Luis Rio Colorado monitoring sites were closed in June 2011. Currently, ADEQ is working with the EPA Border Program as part of the U.S. – Mexico Border Air Policy Forum and the Air Monitoring Working Group. This working group will review the air quality monitoring data and air monitoring networks in rural and urban areas along the border and evaluate the adequacy of these networks to identify operational and maintenance needs, plan for future capabilities, and develop recommendations to resolve any inadequacies. Through this effort, relationships between EPA, ADEQ, Secretariat of Environment and Natural Res ources (SEMARNAT), and Commission for Ecology and Sustainable Development (CEDES) are expected to develop, such that data can be shared across the border and capacity can be built to meet the needs of each of the air monitoring program objectives.

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 113.0 MONITORING NETWORK EVALUATION

This section provides a summary of the changes in ADEQ's current monitoring network that have taken place since the 2011 Network Plan was issued as well as changes planned for the next 18 months. While future changes cannot always be anticipated due to unforeseen circumstances, ADEQ puts forth an extensive effort to document plans for future changes throughout the monitoring network. In the instances that unforeseen changes occur to the monitoring network, these changes will always be documented as having occurred via the network plan. A summary of the changes are listed below. Specific details regarding these changes can be found in their respective sections within Section 4.

3.1 Site Closures

Prescott College AQD – The site may be closed following the 2012 ozone season. It does not meet siting requirements because of the close proximity to tall trees and to a nearby road with a high traffic count. These conditions make the Prescott College AQD site unsuitable for continued, long-term placement of the O 3 monitor. In addition, environmental control issues (the O 3 instrument is in a room at the college that may not be temperature-controlled in summer months) have impacted the operation of the seasonal O 3 monitor. A search for a suitable site will continue in 2012. ADEQ plans to run O 3 monitors at the current Prescott site and at an additional site in Prescott during a portion of the 2012 O 3 season so that data from the two sites can be compared. A potential site has been identified at a Prescott Parks Maintenance building located in the vicinity of Embry Riddle University at 3700 Willow Creek Road in Prescott (ZIP 86301). An E-BAM monitor is also located at the Prescott College site. At this time, it is not known if this E-BAM monitor will be removed along with the O 3 monitor.

Mexico Sites – Due to budget constraints by both ADEQ and EP A, the Agua Prieta Fire Station, Sonora Nogales Fire Station, and San Luis Rio Colorado m onitoring sites were closed in June 2011. ADEQ is working with the EPA Border Program as part of the U.S. – Mexico Border Air Policy Forum and the Air Monitoring Working Group. This working group will review the air quality monitoring data and air monitoring networks in rural and urban areas along the border and evaluate the adequacy of these networks to identify operational and maintenance needs, plan for future capabilities, and develop recommendations to resolve any inadequacies.

Sedona Post Office – Due to concerns about local emissions affecting the PM 2.5 EBAM monitor, a new site was established in Sedona and the Sedona Post Office site was discontinued. Several sites were evaluated with temporary monitors. A location at a Fire Station was determined to be most representative and best suited to house the PM 2.5 EBAM monitor.

Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant South – In an effort to consolidate meteorological and PM instrumentation near the lime plant at Paul Spur, the previously existing meteorological station was discontinued and the meteorological instrumentation was moved to the same location as the PM 10 instruments.

Miami Ridgeline – ADEQ is in the beginning stages of transitioning the Miami, AZ area sites to operation by ADEQ staff. As a result, two additional SO 2 sites and one additional PM 10 site will be operated by ADEQ. With the addition of these sites, ADEQ is proposing to discontinue the Miami

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 12Ridgeline site. The exact timing of this is not known and this process m ay take some time due to the complex nature of such an action. Additional details may be found in Section 4.

3.2 New Sites

Replacement for Prescott College AQD – An O 3 monitor will be located at a new site in Prescott. The current site does not meet siting requirements because of the close proximity to tall trees and to a nearby road with a high traffic count. In addition, environmental control issues have impacted the operation of the seasonal O 3 monitor. A potential site has been identified at a Prescott Parks Maintenance building located in the vicinity of Embry Riddle University at 3700 Willow Creek Road in Prescott (ZIP 86301). It is ADEQ’s goal to run O 3 monitors at the two sites in Prescott during a portion of the 2012 O 3 season so that data from the two sites can be compared.

Sedona Fire Station AQD – Due to concerns about local emissions affecting the PM 2.5 EBAM monitor that was previously located at a Post Office, a new site was established in Sedona. Several sites were evaluated with temporary monitors. A location at a Fire Station was determined to be most representative and best suited to house the PM 2.5 EBAM monitor.

Miami, AZ area sites – ADEQ is in the beginning stages of transitioning the Miami, AZ area sites to operation by ADEQ staff. As a result, two additional SO 2 sites and one additional PM 10 site will be operated by ADEQ. These new sites include Jones Ranch and Miami Townsite for SO 2 and Miami Golf Course for PM 10 . Additional details may be found in Section 4.

3.3 Instrument Changes

Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant PM 10 – The collocated Partisol 2000 instruments were replaced by a continuous TEOM instrument at the beginning of 2012. This reduced the filter-based PM 10 network to six sites which reduced the required number of collocated PM 10 sites to one which is currently Payson Well Site.

Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Meteorology – In an effort to consolidate meteorological and PM instrumentation near the lime plant at Paul Spur, the previously existing meteorological station was discontinued and the meteorological instrumentation was moved to the same location as the PM 10 instruments. Additionally, in an attempt to standardize meteorological measurements at ADEQ sites, a temperature / relative humidity probe was installed at the new site to accompany the existing
anemometer.

JLG Supersite PM 10 , and PM 2.5 TEOMs – The PM 2.5 FDMS TEOM and the PM 10 TEOM instruments will be removed at the end of June 2012. Simultaneous TEOM and BAM monitoring was warranted for a period of time to assess the comparability between the two instrument types.

JLG Supersite Pb – Recent revisions to the Pb monitoring rule required Pb monitoring at NCore sites that are located within a combined statistical area (CBSA) with a population greater than 500,000. The Phoenix CBSA meets this population requirement, th erefore, Pb monitoring is required at ADEQ’s NCore site (JLG Supersite). Currently, a PM 10 low volume sampler produces Pb results as part of the NATTS PM 10 Metals program. ERG recently obtained approval of their ICP-MS analysis method for Pb

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 13State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 14 and will report the Pb concentrations as part of th e NAAQS requirement. It is important to note that no physical changes in instrumentation or analysis method will have been made.

Miami Golf Course PM 10 – ADEQ plans to install a continuous PM 10 TEOM at the Miami Golf Course site in Miami, AZ. The PM instrumentation at this site has historically been operated by Freeport McMoRan. The exact date of installment is not known, but should occur prior to the start of 2013. The data generated from this TEOM will be reported to EPA’s AQS database and serve as the official NAAQS compliance data for the Miami, AZ planning area.

Bullhead City PM 10 – ADEQ anticipates replacing the Partisol 2000 PM 10 instrument with a continuous PM 10 TEOM. There’s also a possibility that a new site may be needed due to some uncertainties at the current Post Office. Logistics are currently being evaluated and a definitive date for replacement has not been determined.

Douglas Red Cross PM 10 & PM 2.5 – ADEQ anticipates replacing the Partisol PM 10 and PM 2.5 instruments with continuous PM instruments. ADEQ is still evaluating which continuous PM 2.5 monitoring method to use, and the decision may impact the continuous PM 10 method selected for the Douglas Red Cross site.

Nogales Post Office Meteorology – In an attempt to standardize meteorological measurements at ADEQ sites, a temperature / relative humidity probe was added to the Nogales Post Office site in August, 2011, which previously only contained an anemometer for measurements of wind speed and direction.

Ajo Meteorology – In an attempt to standardize meteorological measurements at ADEQ sites, a temperature / relative humidity probe may be added to the Ajo site which currently only contains an anemometer for measurements of wind speed and direction.3.4 Summary of Network ChangesTable 3.4-1 Instruments Closed in 2011-2012 or to be Closed in 2012-2013Site NameAQS IDClassificationScaleMonitorObjectiveParameter(s)MeasuredReportto AQSReason for Monitor ClosureJLG Supersite04-013-9997SLAMS/NCoreNeighborhoodPopulationPM10, PM2.5YesPM2.5FDMS TEOM and PM10TEOM replacedby NCore BAMS monitorsPaul Spur Chemical Lime Plant04-003-0011SLAMSMiddleSourcePM10YesCollocated Partisol 2000 PM10instrumentsreplaced by PM10TEOMPaul Spur Chemical Lime PlantSouthNASLAMSMiddleSourceWindNoMeteorology moved from Paul Spur ChemicalLime Plant South site to Paul Spur ChemicalLime Plant.Sedona Post Office04-005-1010SPMNeighborhoodPopulationPM2.5EBAMNoAdverse affect of local emissions. Site moved toSedona Fire Station AQDPrescott College AQD04-025-8033SLAMSNeighborhoodPopulationO3YesSite does not meet EPA siting requirementsBullhead City04-015-1003SLAMSNeighborhoodPopulationPM10YesPartisol 2000 FRM anticipated to be replaced bya continuous instrumentMiami Ridgeline04-007-0009SLAMSNeighborhoodSourceSO2, PM10YesProposing to close site. Associated withtransition to ADEQ operation of MiamimonitorsAgua Prieta Fire Station80-26-1000SPMNeighborhoodTransportPM10, PM2.5YesFunds not available for continued operationSan Luis Rio Colorado80-26-8012SPMNeighborhoodTransportPM10, PM2.5YesFunds not available for continued operationSonora Nogales Fire Station80-26-0005SPMNeighborhoodTransportPM10, PM2.5YesFunds not available for continued operationTable 3.4-2 Instruments Added in 2011-2012 or to be Added in 2012-2013Site/City NameAQS IDClassificationScaleObjectiveParameter(s)MeasuredReportto AQSReason for Monitor AdditionPrescott MSANASLAMSUrban orNeighborhoodPopulationO3YesReplacement for Prescott College AQDPaul Spur Chemical Lime Plant04-003-0011SLAMSMiddleSourcePM10, MetYesPM10TEOM replaced collocated Partisol 2000PM10instrument. Met added replacinginstruments from nearby site.Douglas Red Cross04-003-1005SLAMSNeighborhoodPopulationPM10, PM2.5YesContinuous PM10and PM2.5instrumentsanticipated to replacefilter-based Partisol2000s.Bullhead City04-015-1003SLAMSNeighborhoodPopulationPM10YesContinuous PM10anticipated to replace Partisol2000 FRMMiami Golf Course04-007-8000SLAMSNeighborhoodPopulationPM10YesInstall TEOM as part of transition from FreeportMcMoRan to ADEQ operationState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 15State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 16Site/City NameAQS IDClassificationScaleObjectiveParameter(s)MeasuredReportto AQSReason for Monitor AdditionMiami TownsiteNASLAMSNeighborhoodPopulationSO2YesInstallSO2analyzer as part of transition fromFreeport McMoRan to ADEQ operationJones RanchNASLAMSMiddleSourceSO2YesInstallSO2analyzer as part of transition fromFreeport McMoRan to ADEQ operationSedona Fire Station AQDNASPMNeighborhoodPopulationPM2.5EBAMNoSite moved to Sedona Fire Station AQD fromSedona Post OfficeNogales Post Office04-023-0004SLAMSNeighborhoodPopulationTEMP/RHNoTEMP/RHprobe added to conform to ADEQMet standardsAjo04-019-0001SLAMSNeighborhoodSourceTEMP/RHNoTEMP/RH probe anticipated to be added toexisting site.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 17 4.0 ADEQ MONITORING NETWORKS

Minimu m monitoring requirements for the number of sites in SLAMS networks (including PAMS and NCore) are described in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D and are typically based on the population of urban areas. As EPA reviews the NAAQS for each of the criteria pollutants, additional monitoring requirements for these pollutants may be added. The additional requirements may be based on population or a combination of population and some other metric, such as design values, traffic counts, or emission inventories. Additional monitoring requirements may also be based solely on the discretion of the EPA Regional Administration to adequately assess air quality for sensitive population groups. Currently, minimum monitoring requirements are only associated with MSAs, and there are no minimum monitoring requirements for Micropolitan Statistical Areas.

Table 4.0-1 Metropolitan Statistical Areas As of the July 2010 Census Metropolitan Statistical Area Area included Population Flagstaff Coconino County 134,421 Lake Havasu City – Kingman Mohave County 200,186 Phoenix – Mesa – Scottsdale Maricopa & Pinal Counties 4,192,887 Prescott Yavapai County 211,033 Tucson Pima County 980,263 Yuma Yuma County 195,751

Table 4.0-2 Micropolitan Statistical Areas As of the July 2010 Census Micropolitan Statistical Area County Population Nogales Santa Cruz 47,420 Payson Gila 53,597 Safford Graham 45,657 Show Low Navajo 107,449 Sierra Vista-Douglas Cochise 131,346

4.1 PM 2.5 Monitoring Network Requirements

The number of PM 2.5 samplers required in urban areas is based on population (see Table 4.0-1) and design values for PM 2.5 concentrations (see Table 4.1-2).

Table 4.1-1 Minimum Number of PM 2.5 Monitors Required (40 CFR 58 Appendix D) Population (MSA) Most recent 3 yr design value ≥ 85% of any PM 2.5 NAAQS * Most recent 3 yr design value <85% any PM 2.5 NAAQS *
>1,000,000 3 2
500,000 – 1,000,000 2 1

50,000 – 500,000 1 0 * 85% of Annual NAAQS (15 μ g/m 3 ) = 12.75 μ g/m 3 ; 85% of 24-Hour NAAQS (35
μ g/m 3 ) = 29.75 μ g/m 3State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 18 The required sample collection frequency is based on the type of sampler and the design value calculated from data collected at each FRM (filter-based) or FEM (continuous) sampler (see Table 4.1- 2). 40 CFR Part 58.12 (d)(1) states the manual PM 2.5 sample collection frequency requirement at required SLAMS stations as every third day at sites without a collocated continuously operating PM 2.5 monitor. For SLAMS PM 2.5 sites with manual and continuous PM 2.5 monitors, the agency may request approval from the EPA Regional Administrator for a reduction to every sixth day and/or seasonal sampling schedule. However, in response to EPA’s approval letter for the 2011 Network Plan, ADEQ intends to clarify the sampling schedules for PM 2.5 FRM monitors.

Table 4.1-2 PM 2.5 Design Values and Sampling Frequencies at ADEQ FRM/FEM Sites

Site Name 2009-2011 24-Hour Design Value ( μ g/m 3 ) 2009-2011 Annual Design Value ( μ g/m 3 ) Current Sample Frequency Required Frequency Douglas Red Cross 13 7.0 1 in 6 1 in 3 Flagstaff Middle School 14 5.9 1 in 6 1 in 6 JLG Supersite 21 8.2 1 in 3 1 in 3 Nogales Post Office 30 11.1 1 in 6 1 in 6 Prescott Valley* 10 4.3 1 in 6 1 in 6 Yuma Supersite* 15 7.5 1 in 6 1 in 6 * Indicates SPM monitor

ADEQ currently operates EPA-approved FRM samplers at six PM 2.5 monitoring sites. In addition to the PM 2.5 FRM at JLG Supersite, ADEQ also operates an EPA-approved FEM continuous monitor at this site to fulfill NCore requirements. The FRM sampler is considered the primary monitor for PM 2.5 NAAQS compliance purposes. Several non-FEM continuous PM 2.5 monitors are also in operation throughout the state, most of which are associated with the Smoke Management EBAM network. See Section 2.12 for additional details on the EBAM network.

Monitor Type and Sample Schedule Clarification

ADEQ operates two collocated Partisol 2000 PM 2.5 FRM instruments and a PM 2.5 non-FEM BAM continuous instrument at the Nogales Post Office site. This combination of instruments along with Regional Administrator approval results in a 1-in-6 day monitoring frequency requirement for the FRM instrument(s). ADEQ may replace the non-FEM continuous instrument with an FEM continuous instrument in the future, but until then, plans to maintain the same configuration that is currently in place at the Nogales Post Office site. ADEQ operates a PM 2.5 FRM instrument at Flagstaff Middle School on a 1-in-6 sampling schedule. ADEQ may re-evaluate the need for a PM 2.5 monitor at Flagstaff Middle school due to the long history of low concentrations. at this site. Until then, ADEQ plans to continue operating the FRM sampler on a 1-in-6 sampling schedule due to the collocated continuous non-FEM monitor that is in place as part of the EBAM network.

The Prescott Valley and Yuma Supersite PM 2.5 monitors are special purpose monitors and as a result, can operate on the 1-in-6 day sampling schedule. These monitors had been mistakenly labeled as SLAMS monitors in previous network plans. As part of the 2012 network plan, ADEQ’s intent is to clarify these monitors as SPMs. The initial designa tion of these monitors as SPMs occurred in the 2007State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 19 itors. network plan. In the coming years, ADEQ plans to evaluate the data at these sites to determine if future monitoring is warranted. PM 2.5 concentrations have been low at both sites, particularly at Prescott Valley. Considering the above clarifications, as can be seen from Table 4.1-2, the only PM 2.5 FRM monitor that does not meet the sample frequency requirement is the Douglas Red Cross site. ADEQ plans to replace the Douglas Red Cross filter-based instrument with an FEM continuous instrument following the availability of additional 103 funds. For additional details of the PM 2.5 network and associated sample schedules, see Appendix G for a copy of the letter to EPA Region 9 requesting approval.

SLAMS Sites with design values ±10 percent of 35μg/m 3 (31.5 to 38.5μg/m 3 ) and sites where 24-hour values exceed the NAAQS for three consecutive years require an every third day frequency. Sites within ±5% of 35μg/m 3 (33.25 to 36.75μg/m 3 ) need to operate on a daily schedule. At a minimum, operating frequencies of ADEQ PM 2.5 monitors will be evaluated every five years as part of the Five Year Network Assessment. More frequent evaluations may occur, which would be addressed in the annual monitoring network plan.

4.1.1 PM 2.5 Collocation Requirements

Table 4.1-3 summarizes ADEQ’s PM 2.5 collocation requirements. As can be seen in the table, only one collocated site is needed for the ADEQ PM 2.5 network. This site is the Nogales Post Office Site, which is the highest PM 2.5 design value site in the ADEQ PM 2.5 network. While ADEQ does operate one continuous FEM monitor at the JLG Supersite, this monitor is not the primary monitor and therefore, does not require a collocated FRM. However, due to NCore requirements, a PM 2.5 FRM is located at this site also. The JLG Supersite continuous PM 2.5 FEM monitor is labeled as both an NCore monitor as well as a QA Collocated monitor for the FRM primary monitor. While the methods are different, value is still gained by evaluating data from these collocated mon

Table 4.1-3 PM 2.5 FRM/FEM Collocation Details

Method Code # of Sites # of Primary Monitors # of Required Collocated Monitors # of Active Collocated Monitors 143 (Partisol 2000) 6 6 1 2 1 170 (Met One BAM 1020) 1 0 0 1 2

1 One site contains collocated monitors of the same me thod (Nogales Post Office) while one contains collocated monitors of differing methods (JLG Supersite)
2 Collocation is of differing methods (JLG Supersite)

4.1.2 Compliance with 40 CFR Part 58.10 (c)

A process for relocating violating PM 2.5 monitors is described in 40 CFR Part 58.10 (c). It requires the annual monitoring network plan to document how state and local agencies provide for the review of changes to a PM 2.5 monitoring network that impact the location of a violating PM 2.5 monitor or the creation/change to a community monitoring zone, including a description of the proposed use of spatial averaging for purposes of making comparisons to the annual PM 2.5 NAAQS as set forth in Appendix NState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 20 to Part 50. The affected agency must document the process for obtaining public comment and include any comments received through the public notification process within their submitted plan.

ADEQ does not intend to establish community monitoring zones as described in the rule or utilize spatial averaging for comparison to the PM 2.5 NAAQS. A public comment procedure is required prior to relocation of a violating monitor and ADEQ will utilize the following procedure: 1. Evaluation of the potential replacement site will include review and comparison of available pollutant data, meteorology, climatology, terrain, and siting characteristics. This information will be documented in a brief report. 2. Make notice of such a change in the annual monitoring network plan. 3. If the change must be accomplished prior to annual monitoring network plan submittal, ADEQ will make appropriate notice via the agency Web page and invite participation from the public prior to relocation of the affected site. 4. Relocation of the monitor.

4.2 PM 10 Monitoring Network Requirements

The number of PM 10 samplers required in urban areas is based on population (see Table 4.2-1) and design values for PM 10 24-hour concentrations (see Table 4.2-2). Maricopa, Pinal, and Pima Counties have delegation authority for their monitoring networks and AQS reporting. ADEQ's PM 10 monitoring network includes the MSAs in all other Arizona counties, as well as the PM 10 non-attainment areas in those counties. ADEQ operates a PM coarse monitor (difference method using BAM instruments) in the Phoenix metropolitan area at the JLG Supersite NCore site. PM 10 concentrations are available from the PM 10 BAM instrument to support the multipollutant measurements at that site.

Table 4.2-1 Minimum Number of PM 10 Monitors Required (40 CFR 58 Appendix D)

Population (MSA) High Concentration Exceeds 24-Hour NAAQS by 20% or more (>180μg/m 3 ) Medium Concentration Exceeds 80% of 24- Hour NAAQS

(>120μg/m 3 ) Low Concentration Less than 80% of 24-Hour NAAQS (<120 μg/m 3 )
>1,000,000 6-10 4-8 2-4 500,000 – 1,000,000 4-8 2-4 1-2

250,000 – 500,000 3-4 1-2 0-1 100,000 – 250,000 1-2 0-1 0

The monitoring rule in 40 CFR Part 58.12 (e) states that for PM 10 sites, “...the minimum monitoring schedule for the site in the area of expected maximum concentration shall be based on the relative level of that monitoring site concentration with respect to the 24-hour standard.” In rural areas of Arizona where there is only one PM 10 monitor to represent the area, such as Ajo, Hayden, and Yuma, sites can be considered de facto maximum-concentration sites whose operating frequencies must be determined using the Ratio-to-Standard diagram in 40 CFR Part 58.12 (e). Due to the variability in PM 10 concentrations from year to year throughout Arizona, the operating frequencies of ADEQ PM 10 monitors will be evaluated every five years as part of the Five Year Network Assessment. In response to the PM 10 sampling frequency comments raised in EPA’ s approval letter of ADEQ’s 2011 Network Plan,State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 21 both PM 10 sample frequencies are specifically addressed in this year’s plan. Table 4.2-2 provides the maximum 24-hour concentration and the ‘design value to NAAQS ratio’ for each site as was published in the 2010 Network Plan, as well as updated information using the most recent data (2009-2011). As can be seen in the table, four of the twelve sites experienced a change in the required sampling frequency over the two year period. Two sites would have required more frequent sampling while two would have required less frequent sampling. Ba sed on the recommended methodology used to assess PM 10 sample frequencies, the changes in required sampling frequencies that would occur on a year to year basis make it impractical to assess and implement sample frequency changes as part of the annual monitoring network plan. As a result, ADEQ has confirmed that the Five Year Network Assessment will be a better tool to assess sampling frequencies throughout the PM 10 network. Additionally, ADEQ’s general trend towards continuous PM 10 monitoring should alleviate some of these concerns in the future. Taking into consideration the recent changes to the PM 10 network and planned changes to occur in the next year, all sites now meet or exceed the sample frequency requirement as determined from evaluations.

In recent years, ADEQ has transitioned several PM 10 monitors from filter-based methods to continuous methods. As stated in ADEQ’s Five Year Networ k Assessment, this transition to continuous PM 10 samplers continues to be a focus for ADEQ. As a continuation of this effort, replacing the filter-based PM 10 monitors in Bullhead City and Douglas Red Cross is being evaluated and will likely occur within the next six to twelve months. In addition to these planned changes, ADEQ is also currently negotiating with Freeport McMoRan in the Miami, AZ area to install and operate a continuous PM 10 TEOM at the Miami Golf Course site. The PM 10 monitor at this site has previously been operated by Freeport McMoRan. With the operation of a PM 10 monitor by ADEQ staff, the data can be more efficiently loaded to the ADEQ internal database, and ultimately reported to EPA’s AQS database in a timely manner. Due to potential changes in the SO 2 network, ADEQ is also proposing that Freeport McMoRan discontinue PM 10 monitoring at the Miami Ridgeline site as the Miami Golf Course site represents maximum concentrations in the Miami area. For additional details on these proposed changes to the PM 10 network, see Appendix H for a copy of the letter to EPA Region 9 requesting approval.

Table 4.2-3 shows the most recent design values for all sites within ADEQ’s PM 10 network. Due to the large number of exceptional events that have occurred over the last several years, two separate design value scenarios are provided. Additionally, due to changes from filter-based to continuous monitors at several sites, PM 10 data from different instrumentation were merged at some sites to calculate the expected number of exceedances over the three-year period.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 22 Table 4.2-2 PM 10 Maximum Values and Sampling Frequencies for ADEQ Monitors
Required Frequency

Site Name 2007-2009 Max ( μ g/m 3 ) Ratio 2009-2011 Max ( μ g/m 3 ) Ratio Current Sample Frequency 2010 Network Plan 2012 Network Plan Ajo 153 1.02 213 1.42 Continuous Every Day 1 in 6 Bullhead City 98 0.65 132 0.88 1 in 6 1 in 6 Every Other Day Douglas Red Cross 97 0.65 138 0.92 1 in 6 1 in 6 Every Day Flagstaff Middle School 56 0.37 61 0.40 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 Hayden Old Jail 225 1.50 225 1.50 Continuous 1 in 6 1 in 6 JLG Supersite 521 3.47 331 2.20 Continuous 1 in 6 1 in 6 Nogales Post Office 238 1.58 238 1.58 1 in 6 and Continuous 1 in 6 1 in 6 Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant 159 1.06 85 0.56 Continuous Every Day 1 in 6 Payson Well Site 61 0.41 42 0.28 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 Prescott Valley 63 0.42 90 0.60 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 Rillito 208 1.39 242 1.61 Continuous 1 in 6 1 in 6 Yuma 386 2.57 306 2.04 Continuous 1 in 6 1 in 6State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 23 Table 4.2-3 PM 10 Design Values (Estimated Exceedances) and Annual Means for ADEQ Sites

Site Name 2009-2011 Estimated Days PM 10 >150 μ g/m 3 Including Events 2009-2011 Estimated Days PM 10 >150 μ g/m 3 Excluding Events 2011 Annual Mean Concentration
μ g/m 3
Ajo 1 1.4 0 29.0 Bullhead City 0 0 15.4 Douglas Red Cross * 0 0 34.5 Flagstaff Middle School 0 0 15.7 Hayden Old Jail 1 1.0 0 40.5 JLG Supersite 2.0 0 34.3 Nogales Post Office FRM 0 0 39.7 Nogales Post Office Continuous 4.2 3.5 54.2 Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant 0 0 23.2 Payson Well Site 0 0 18.0 Prescott Valley 0 0 11.4 Rillito 1 2.0 0 41.9 Yuma Supersite 2 2.7 0 29.8

1 Filter-based and continuous records merged to calculate design value
2 Continuous records from Yuma Courthouse and Yuma Supersite merged to calculate design value * Design Value does not meet data completeness criteria

4.2.1 PM 10 Collocation Requirements

Table 4.2-1 summarizes ADEQ’s PM 10 collocation requirements. As can be seen in the table, only one collocated site is needed for the ADEQ PM 10 network. This site is the Payson Well Site. While the Payson Well Site annual mean is not within the highest 25% of the PM 10 FRM network, the highest site (Nogales Post Office) is collocated with a PM 10 BAM monitor. The Payson Well Site is the third highest of the PM 10 FRM network. In addition to the one required collocated site, ADEQ operat additional sites with collocated PM es two

10 instruments, although one of these sites (JLG Supersite) will be reduced to one PM 10 monitor in the near future. While the methods are different, value is still gained by evaluating data from these collocated monitors.

Table 4.2-4 PM 10 FRM/FEM Collocation Details

Method Code # of Sites # of Primary Monitors # of Required Collocated Monitors # of Active Collocated Monitors 126 (Partisol 2000) 6 6 1 2 1 079 (TEOM) 6 5 0 1 2 122 (BAM) 2 1 0 1 2

1 One site contains collocated monitors of the same method (Payson Well Site) while one contains collocated monitors of differing methods (Nogales Post Office)
2 Collocation is of differing methods (Nogales Post Office FRM & BAM; JLG Supersite BAM & TEOM)State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 24 4.3 O 3 Monitoring Network Requirements

The minimum monitoring requirements for O 3 are shown below in Table 4.3-1. In September 2011, the EPA indicated that they would uphold their original 2008 decision to set the eight-hour NAAQS at 0.075 ppm. The EPA has also indicated that the proposed monitoring rule issued in July 2009, would likely not move forward on several fronts. Unlike previous network plans, ADEQ will not include the 2009 proposed monitoring rule in their network plan evaluation for 2012. As a result, ADEQ is no longer considering installing an ozone monitor within the Lake Havasu / Kingman MSA. If future monitoring rules require such a monitor, ADEQ will re-evaluate the ozone network.

Table 4.3-1 Minimum Number of O 3 Monitors Required (40 CFR 58 Appendix D)

Population (MSA) Most recent 3 year 8- hour Design Value ≥ 85% of NAAQS (0.075 ppm) or no Design

Value available Most recent 3 year 8- hour Design Value <85% NAAQS (0.075 ppm)

>10 Million 4 2 4-10 Million 3 1 350,000 - 4 Million 2 1

50,000 – 350,000 1 0

ADEQ operates a network of seven O 3 monitors throughout Arizona (see Table 4.3-2). Authority to operate O 3 monitors has been delegated to Maricopa, Pima, and Pinal counties. ADEQ will be relocating the Prescott College AQD monitor following the 2012 O 3 season due to siting requirements. Prior to the 2011 O 3 season, ADEQ upgraded their O 3 monitoring network by replacing the Thermo 43C analyzers with newer API Teledyne analyzers.

Table 4.3-2 O 3 Design Values at ADEQ Sites

Site Current Operating Schedule 2009-2011 Design Value (ppm) Alamo Lake March - October 0.070 Flagstaff Middle School March - October 0.067 JLG Supersite January - December 0.075 Prescott College AQD March - October 0.066 Queen Valley March - October 0.073 Tonto National Monument March - October 0.072 Yuma Supersite March - October 0.073

4.3.1 O 3 Season

In accordance with 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, Paragraph 4.1(i), ADEQ was granted a modification to the January through December O 3 season defined in the regulation. Prior to the 2008 revision to the O 3State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 25 NAAQS, the 1998 EPA guidance document entitled, “Guideline for Selecting and Modifying the Ozone Monitoring Season Based on an Eight-Hour Ozone Standard” supported a shorter O 3 season for Arizona (April through October) based upon data collected from 1990-1995. During the Spring of 2011, this analysis was updated to include the 2008 O 3 NAAQS, as well as more recent data. To get the best representation of the entire state, data from all O 3 sites in Arizona were used in the analysis. For the period 2006-2010, the average number of days above 85 percent of the 2008 NAAQS of 0.075 ppm continues to support the operation of seasonal monitors (see Figure 4.3-1). However, the data indicate that the O 3 season should be extended one month to include the month of March. In 2012 ADEQ extended the O 3 season by starting to monitor in March instead of April. ADEQ may do additional monitoring in the off season of November – February for its own purposes; however, those data will not be reported to the AQS database. As shown in Table 4.3-2, the current ADEQ seasonal sites are Alamo Lake, Flagstaff Middle School, Prescott College AQD, Queen Valley, Tonto National Monument, and Yuma Supersite. The JLG Supersite will continue to operate on a January to December schedule.

Figure 4.3-1 Average Number of Days exceeding 85% of the 2008 O 3 NAAQS

2006-2010 Average Number of Days > 85% Ozone Standard In All Arizona Ozone Sites Combined

0 5 10 15 20 25

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecTotal Ozone Exceedances

4.4 Pb Monitoring Network Requirements

In November 2008, EPA revised the Pb NAAQS from 1.5 μ g/m 3 to 0.15 μ g/m 3 . New requirements for the placement of monitors were added: (1) near Pb sources (by January 1, 2010) having annual ambient air Pb emissions that are expected to exceed one ton and (2) in non-source urban areas (by January 1, 2011) with populations greater than 500,000. In December 2009, EPA proposed revisions to these monitoring requirements. In December, 2010, the EPA finalized the Pb monitoring requirements which required Pb monitoring near sources with Pb emissions greater than 0.5 tons. Monitors near these 0.5 to 1 ton sources are to be operational one year from the date of the final rule. Additionally, the final rule adjusted the non-source monitoring requirement to be limited to NCore sites with CBSA populations greater than 500,000. ADEQ has installed source-oriented Pb monitors at the Globe Highway site as well as the Miami Golf Course site, effective January, 2011. For the NCore-Pb requirement, ADEQ will use the same PM 10 metals speciation sample that is used for the NATTS program for the analysis of Pb in PM 10 . Eastern Research Group (ERG) currently analyzes these samples and has recently received EPA approval for the ICP-MS analysis method for lead. No changes in the actual monitoring or analysis method will occur for Pb data collected at JLG Supersite; however, a new parameter code and method code may be associated with the data in AQS due to the newly approved analysis method. The PbState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 26 monitoring final rule also clarified that Pb monitoring will not be required in the Prescott area, despite Ernest A. Love Field Airport exceeding the 0.5 ton Pb emissions threshold.

Table 4.4-1 Pb Design Values at ADEQ Sites

Site Name 2009-2011 Design Value (μg/m 3 ) Globe Highway 1 0.27 Miami Golf Course 2 0.06 JLG Supersite * --- * PM 10 Metals (low-Vol., filter-based) analysis method approved 2012
1 Design Value based on one year of data, but is valid due to NAAQS violation
2 Design Value invalid due to incomplete data (only one year collected)

4.4.1 Pb Collocation Requirements

Table 4.4-2 summarizes ADEQ’s Pb collocation requirements. As can be seen in the table, only one collocated site is needed for the ADEQ Pb network. This site is the Globe Highway site in Hayden, AZ. As can be seen in table 4.4-1, this site contains the highest design value in the Pb network. Collocation for NCore-Pb sites are determined by the EPA, and the JLG Supersite has not been selected as a collocated site.

Table 4.4-2 Pb FRM/FEM Collocation Details

Method Code # of Sites # of Primary Monitors # of Required Collocated Monitors # of Active Collocated Monitors 191 (Pb-TSP ICPMS) 2 2 1 1 202 (Pb-PM 10 ICPMS) 1 1 0 0

4.5 SO 2 Monitoring Network Requirements

ADEQ operates a network of three SO 2 monitors throughout Arizona. Authority to operate SO 2monitors has also been delegated to Maricopa and Pima counties. ASARCO LLC and FreeportMcMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. also operate SO 2 monitoring networks in Gila County for compliance purposes to support SIP requirements. ADEQ is currently negotiating with both companies to make changes in which ADEQ may assume some of the SO 2 monitoring respon sibilities.

Table 4.5-1 SO 2 Design Values at ADEQ Sites

Site Name 2009-2011 1-Hour Design Value (ppb) Miami Ridgeline 111 Hayden Old Jail 259 JLG Supersite * 7 * Based on incomplete data (2011)State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 27 The SO 2 monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D is based on a Population Weighted Emissions Index (PWEI) that is calculate d for each CBSA. CBSAs with PWEIs greater than 5,000 require at least one SO 2 monitor. CBSAs with PWEIs greater than 100,000 require a minimum of two SO 2 monitors. The Phoenix and Tucson metropolitan areas are the only areas within the state of Arizona that require ambient monitoring of SO 2 . The current SO 2 monitors in place that are operated by Maricopa and Pima counties meet or exceed the current monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D. In an effort to more efficiently report SO 2 and PM 10 data to EPA’s AQS database, ADEQ has begun negotiations with Freeport McMoRan to discuss changes in operator status. ADEQ may assume monitoring responsibilities or collocate monitors at Freeport McMoRan sites in the Miami, AZ area. ADEQ is proposing to collocate SO 2 monitors at Freeport McMoRan’s Jones Ranch and Miami Townsite sites. Data from these monitors would be routinely reported to EPA’s AQS database. In doing so, ADEQ is proposing to discontinue the Miami Ridgeline site as the Jones Ranch and Miami Townsite sites would provide sufficient coverage for SO 2 concentrations in the Miami area with the Jones Ranch site representing maximum concentrations and the Miami Townsite site representing general population exposure. For additional details on these changes, see Appendix H for a copy of the letter to EPA Region 9 requesting approval. ADEQ has also contacted ASARCO LLC to discuss similar changes. Until a more permanent plan is established, ADEQ will continue to operate at least one SO 2 monitor in the Hayden and Miami areas to support the local facility networks. Additionally, ADEQ will continue to work with these facilities to obt ain quality assured data and will perform annual performance evaluations for these facilities’ SO 2 monitors. ADEQ also operates a trace-level SO 2 monitor at its NCore site (JLG Supersite), as required in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D.

4.6 NO 2 Monitoring Network Requirements

ADEQ operates one NO 2 monitor throughout the state of Arizona. This NO 2 monitor is located at the JLG Supersite and is operated to fulfill a PAMS requirement. Authority to operate NO 2 monitors has also been delegated to Maricopa and Pima counties.

The NO 2 monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D are based on a combination of CBSA population and Annual Average Daily Traffi c (AADT) counts. The first requirement to be considered is the CBSA population. CBSAs with populations greater than 500,000 are required to operate one near roadway monitor, while CBSAs with populations greater than 2.5 million are required to operate two near roadway monitors. Additionally, CBSAs with populations greater than 500,000 which also contain roadway segments with 250,000 or greater AADT also require two near roadway monitors. As can be seen in table 4.0-1, two CBSAs (Phoenix and Tucson Metro areas) within the state of Arizona contain populations greater than 500,000 and therefore require at least one NO 2 near roadway monitor. The Phoenix CBSA also exceeds the 2.5 million population requirement, therefore two near roadway monitors are needed in the Phoenix CBSA. The required near roadway monitors in Tucson and Phoenix will be operated by the local monitoring agencies in their respected areas. Recent guidance from EPA has indicated a phased approach for NO 2 near roadway monitor installments. The phased approach would push back the deadlines for monitor installments to January, 2014 for Maricopa County and January, 2017 for Pima County. As a result, Pima County has relaxed their planning efforts given the longer time frame. As part of the five-year network assessment submitted in 2011, ADEQ has reviewed population and AADT data and has determined that no other areas in the state require near roadway NO 2 monitors.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 28 In addition to the near roadway monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D, there is also a requirement for area-wide NO 2 monitoring. CBSAs with populations of one million or more require one NO 2 monitor to measure NO 2 concentrations that represent neighborhood or larger spatial scales. The Phoenix metropolitan area is the only area within the state of Arizona that require ambient monitoring of NO 2 . The current NO 2 monitors in place that are operated by Maricopa and Pima counties meet or exceed the current monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D. ADEQ will continue to monitor NO 2 at JLG Supersite as part of the NO x measurements which are required for the PAMS program.

Table 4.6-1 NO 2 Design Values at ADEQ Sites

Site Name 2009-2011 1-Hour Design Value (ppb) JLG Supersite * 54 * Design Value does not meet data completeness criteria

4.7 CO Monitoring Network Requirements

ADEQ operates one CO (carbon monoxide) m onitor throughout Arizona. This CO monitor utilizes an instrument with sufficient sensitivity to monitor trace le vels. It is located at the JLG Supersite to fulfill NCore and PAMS monitoring requirements. Authority to operate CO monitors has also been delegated to Maricopa and Pima counties. The Phoenix population exceeds the one million population requirement set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D, therefore one CO monitor is required to be collocated with a near-road NO 2 monitor. The required near roadway monitor in Phoenix will be operated by Maricopa County. The most recent Census data show the Tucson MSA slipped slightly below one million so no near-road CO monitoring is required. The one CO monitor that is currently operated by ADEQ meets or exceeds the minimum monitoring requirements for the NCore and PAMS, network design criteria set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D. Due to the low range for which the JLG CO analyzer operates, ADEQ urges some caution when interpreting data for the purpose of NAAQS compliance. While under most circumstances the data can be used to determine compliance with the CO NAAQS due to the low nature of the ambient concentrations, the operating range (0-5 ppm) is below that of the CO NAAQS (9 ppm), therefore under certain rare circumstances (i.e. concentrations > 5 ppm), determining compliance with the CO NAAQS may not be possible.

Table 4.7-1 CO Design Values at ADEQ Sites

Site Name 2011 CO 1-Hour Design Value (ppm) 2011 CO 8-Hour Design Value (ppm) JLG Supersite * 2.7 2.1

* Design Value does not meet data completeness criteria

4.8 PAMS Monitoring Network Requirements

Network design and monitoring requirem ents for PA MS stations are provided in 40 CFR 58 Appendix D for areas classified as serious, severe, or extreme nonattainment for O 3 . Two sites are required forState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 29 each area, providing all chemical measurements are made. Measurements include speciated VOCs, carbonyls, NO x , trace level nitrogen oxides (NO y ), CO, O 3 , surface meteorology, and upper air meteorology. In 2008, EPA shortened the PAMS monitoring season to June through August.

ADEQ's PAMS network consists of two ambient air monitoring sites in the Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale MSA and a meteorological site for the collection of upper air meteorological data and solar radiation data.

JLG Supersite – Type 2 PAMS Site The JLG Supersite was designated a PAMS site in 1999. Since the required manual method of eight three-hour canisters running daily is impractical due to increased expenses for staff, shipping, and analysis, ADEQ returned in 2008 to the 2006 monitoring schedule of a 24-hour canister sample every sixth day at the JLG Supersite during PAMS season for VOCs. This will be reviewed when the final results of the PAMS re-engineering program are available which is anticipated to include recommendations for changes to monitoring and new types of instruments. ADEQ also operates carbonyl, O 3 , CO, NOx, and surface meteorological monitoring equipment at JLG Supersite (see Table 4.8-1). Carbonyl monitoring at JLG Supersite is not currently required for PAMS but because carbonyls are considered important for PAMS, there are no cu rrent plans to discontinue carbonyl monitoring at JLG Supersite.

Table 4.8-1 JLG Supersite PAMS Instrumentation

Parameter Period of Operation Collection Method Frequency and Duration

VOC * June – August Canister Sampler Every 6th day, 24 Hr Carbonyl * June – August Multi-port Carbonyl Sampler Every 6th day, 3 - 3hr samples (0500-0800, 0800-1100, 1100- 1400) CO Jan – Dec Trace CO Hourly average
O 3 Jan – Dec O 3 Analyzer Hourly average
NOx Jan – Dec NOx Analyzer Hourly average Meteorology Jan – Dec  wind speed/direction

 temperature

 relative humidity Hourly average

* 24-hour VOC and Carbonyl measurements are also co llected year-round as part of the NATTS program

Queen Valley – Type 3 PAMS Site Queen Valley was designated a PAMS site in 2001. The site is located near the southeastern edge of the photochemical modeling grid domain and is considered to be downwind of the source of maximum precursor emissions in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Pollutants collected at the site include speciated PAMS VOCs, O 3 , total reactive NOx, and surface meteorology measurements. ADEQ’s Five-Year Network Assessment identified the Queen Valley site as not meeting PAMS monitoring requirements due to the lack of meteorological measurements. Meteorological instrumentation was added during the second quarter of 2011. Carbonyl samples are not required at Type 3 sites. Table 4.8-2 lists the instrumentation and monitoring schedule at the Queen Valley site.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 30 Table 4.8-2 Queen Valley PAMS Instrumentation

Parameter Period of Operation Collection Method Frequency and Duration

VOC June – August Multi-port sampler Every 6 th day, 24Hr, and 3 – 3hr samples (0500-0800, 1300-1600, 1600-1900) O 3 March – October O 3 Analyzer Hourly average NOy June – August NOy Analyzer Hourly average Meteorology Jan – Dec  wind speed/direction

 temperature

 relative humidity Hourly average

Vehicle Emissions Laboratory – Upper Air Meteorology Site This site is intended to be a meteorological ‘supersite’ and includes a pyranometer to measure total solar radiation, UV solar radiation, wind speed, wind direc tion, differential temperature (2 meters and 10 meters), and relative humidity. Barometric pressure and precipitation measurements are collected by the National Weather Service (NWS) site at nearby Sky Harbor Airport. A Radio Acoustic Sounding System (RAAS) and a wind profiler have also been collecting continuous upper air meteorological data for determination of mixing heights since 1998. The PAMS re-engineering workgroup has noted the high maintenance cost and lack of use of the RASS and wind profiler data and unofficially recommended against its continued use – particularly if usable data is available from other sources. As a result, ADEQ is considering discontinuing its use. EPA is currently exploring the possibility of using mixing height data from some of the 1,000 ceilometers recently placed in use by NOAA.

Table 4.8-3 Vehicle Emissions Laboratory PAMS Instrumentation Parameter Period of Operation Method Duration Meteorology Jan – Dec  Radio Acoustic Sounding System (RASS)

 pyranometer (total solar radiation)

 ultra-violet (UV solar)

 wind speed/direction

 temperature

 relative humidity Hourly average

4.9 NCore Monitoring Network Requirements

EPA has identified JLG Supersite as the required NCore site for the Phoenix metropolitan area. JLG Supersite has a long history of mu ltipollutant monitoring since its establishment in 1993. Currently, several monitoring programs are supported at this site, (SLAMS, PAMS, NATTS, and CSN) as well as meteorology. The required NCore parameters are listed in Table 4.9-1. All required NCore monitors were operational by January 1, 2011. EPA approved ADEQ's NCore monitoring plan submitted in 2009, but did not grant the waiver request to substitute NOx monitoring f or NOy. The NCore-Pb requirement is being met by using the current PM metals speciation sampler (PM Low-Vol Partisol 2000) and associated samp les. ADEQ recently received notice that the ERG analysis method for PM metals 10 10

10State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 31 speciation has been approved as a Federal Equivalent Method (FEM) for the analysis of Pb. While there will be no physical changes to the instrumentation or analysis method for Pb at the NCore site, the parameter code and method code associated with Pb-PM data in AQS may change as is appropriate. 10
Table 4.9-1 JLG Supersite NCore Instrumentation Required Measurement Frequency/Duration Status PM 2.5 FRM mass 24 hour average every 3rd day Thermo Partisol is current instrument; PM 2.5 samples collected since 1999 PM 2.5 speciation - organic and elemental carbon, major ions, and trace metals 24 hour average; every 3rd day MetOne SuperSASS with URG module is current instrument; STN samples collected since 1999

Continuous PM coarse mass Hourly MetOne BAM 1020 FEM pair Continuous PM 2.5 mass Hourly MetOne BAM 1020 FEM pair O 3 Hourly API Teledyne 400E CO Hourly Ecotech EC 9830 SO 2 Hourly Ecotech EC 9850 NO/NOy Hourly Ecotech EC 9843 Surface meteorology Hourly RM Young anemometer, Rotronics temperature/relative humidity probe currently in operation Pb 24 hour average; every 6th day Currently Pb measurements are from the NATTS PM 10 metals sampler. EPA recently approved ERG’s ICP-MS analysis method as an FEM.

4.10 SIP Monitoring Network Requirements

ADEQ is responsible for preparation and submittal of SIPs to EPA for the non-attainm ent and maintenance areas in Arizona. ADEQ is also responsible for conducting ambient air monitoring for these areas with the exception of the delegated agreements with Maricopa, Pima, and Pinal counties and tribal lands. Permitted sources are also responsible for monitoring air quality, if it is included in their air quality permit. Some monitoring sites are specifically named in some SIPs; other monitoring sites are not specifically named, but are representative of the air quality in that SIP area. Table 4.10-1 lists the ADEQ and source operated monitors used to determine SIP compliance.

Table 4.10-1 SIP Network Monitoring Requirements Note: Sites in italics are specifically required in SIP ; others meet the general SIP requirement that representative monitoring be conducted (no specific monitoring sites named in SIP). Area and County Pollutant Classification ADEQ SIP Sites
Phoenix, Maricopa CO Maintenance/Attainment JLG Supersite Phoenix, Maricopa O 3 1-hr Maintenance/Attainment JLG Supersite, Tonto National Monument Phoenix-Apache Junction, Maricopa and Pinal O 3 8-hr “Basic” Nonattainment Alamo Lake, JLG Supersite , Queen Valley, Tonto National Monument Ajo, Pima PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Ajo Bullhead City, Mohave PM 10 Maintenance/Attainment Bullhead City (Post Office)State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 32 Area and County Pollutant Classification ADEQ SIP Sites
Douglas-Paul Spur, Cochise PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Douglas Red Cross ,Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Hayden, Gila and Pinal PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Hayden Old Jail

Miami, Gila PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Freeport McMoRan sites: Golf Course & Miami Ridgeline Nogales, Santa Cruz PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Nogales Post Office Payson, Gila PM 10 Maintenance/Attainment Payson Well Site Phoenix, Maricopa, and Pinal (Apache Junction portion) Phoenix (Salt River Area) PM 10 Serious Nonattainment JLG Supersite

Rillito, Pima PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Rillito Yuma, Yuma PM 10 Moderate Nonattainme nt Yuma Supersite Nogales, Santa Cruz PM 2.5 Nonattainment Nogales Post Office Ajo, Pima SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment Douglas, Cochise SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment Hayden, Gila and Pinal SO 2 Nonattainment – Primary ADEQ (SO 2 , MET): Hayden Old Jail ASARCO (5 SO 2 , 3 MET [no met at Jail or Garfield]): Globe Hwy, Garfield Ave., Montgomery Ranch, Hayden Old Jail, Hayden Junction Miami, Gila SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment ADEQ: Miami Ridgeline Freeport McMoRan (SO 2 , MET) Jones Ranch, Miami Townsite Morenci, Greenlee SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment San Manuel, Pima and Pinal SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment Regional Haze, 12 Class I

areas Visibility Impairing pollutants (VOC, NOx, SO 2 , PM 10 , PM 2.5 , PM 2.5 species) Statewide – IMPROVE monitors ADEQ Protocol sites: Douglas Red Cross, Organ Pipe Natl Monument, JLG Supersite, Queen Valley, Saguaro West Natl Monument, Meadview

NPS / USFS sites: Chiricahua Entrance Station, Greer Water Treatment Plant, Grand Canyon - Indian Gardens, Grand Canyon - Hance Camp, Ike’s Backbone, Meadview, Petrified Forest National Park, Pleasant Valley Ranger Sta tion, Saguaro National Park-East, Sycamore Canyon, Tonto National Monument

4.11 Source Compliance Monitoring Network Requirements

Historically, ADEQ has required several of the major point sources in the state to conduct am bient monitoring for selected pollutants in and around specific facilities. Some requirements are for prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) monitoring prior to operation of the facility. Other monitoring requirements are for the duration of the permit. ADEQ activities have been limited to regular performance audits of some equipment at these sites and review of ambient data submitted according to permit requirements. Recently, ADEQ has begun to submit a portion of these data to the EPA AQS database to support SIP compliance. Sources are required to review their data and submit quality assurance documents to ADEQ with the data. Table 4.11-1 lists the monitors operated by ADEQ permitted sources. ADEQ staff are currently working with ASARCO and Freeport McMoRan staff toState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 33 acquire and report SO 2 data from Miami and Hayden to the EPA AQS database. In an effort to more efficiently report SO 2 and PM 10 data from these areas to EPA’s AQS database, ADEQ has begun negotiations with Freeport McMoRan to discuss changes in operator status. ADEQ may assume monitoring responsibilities or collocate monitors at existing Freeport McMoRan sites in the Miami, AZ area. ADEQ has also contacted ASARCO LLC to di scuss similar changes. ADEQ will continue to perform annual performance evaluations for these facilities’ SO 2 monitors. Except for potential changes to the Miami and Hayden area networks, the only other change in the source compliance monitoring network includes the discontinuation of PM 10 monitors in Rillito. ADEQ has operated a continuous PM 10 TEOM in Rillito for several years now, therefore, PM 10 monitoring conducted by the source was determined to be redundant and unnecessary.

Table 4.11-1 Source Compliance Monitoring Network
Site Name City Pollutant(s) AQS Submittal Globe Highway Winkelman SO 2 No ASARCO – Hayden – Garfield Ave. Hayden SO 2 No ASARCO – Montgomery Ranch Hayden SO 2 No ASARCO – Hayden Junction Hayden Junction SO 2 No Hayden Old Jail Hayden SO 2 No 1
Chemical Lime Plant Nelson Meteorology No

Drake Cement Sycamore Canyon PM 10 , PM 2.5 mass and ammonium speciation, Meteorology No

Miami Ridgeline Miami PM 10 mass and metals speciation Yes (PM 10 mass only)

Miami Golf Course Miami PM 10 mass and metals speciation, collocated Yes (PM 10 mass only) FMMI – Miami – Jones Ranch Miami SO 2 No 2
FMMI – Miami – Townsite Miami SO 2 No 2

PCC – Clarkdale NW Clarkdale PM 10 mass and metals speciation, Meteorology No

PCC – Clarkdale SE Clarkdale PM 10 mass and metals speciation, Meteorology No

Carlota Mine – Sanctuary Globe PM 10 , H 2 SO 4 , Meteorology NoState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 34 Site Name City Pollutant(s) AQS Submittal

TEP – Springerville – Coyote Hills Springerville NO 2 , PM 10 , SO 2 , Meteorology No TEP – Springerville – Coal Yard Springerville PM 10 No

1 ADEQ also operates an SO 2 monitor at the Hayden Old Jail site. The ADEQ data are submitted to AQS while the facility data are not.
2 ADEQ has not yet been able to report these data to the AQS database.

4.12 Class I Visibility Network

Visibility monitoring networks track im pairment in specified national parks and wilderness areas. These parks and wilderness areas are called Class I Areas and were designated based on an evaluation required by Congress in the 1977 federal CAA Amendments. The evaluation which was performed by the USFS and NPS reviewed the wilderness areas of parks and national forests which were designated as wilderness before 1977, were more than 6,000 acres in size, and have visual air quality as an important resource for visitors. Of the 156 Class I Areas designated across the nation, 12 are located in Arizona.

For the Class I Area designations, EPA initiated a nationally-operated monitoring network in 1987 called the I nteragency M onitoring of PRO tected V isual E nvironments (IMPROVE) program. The purpose of the network is to characterize broad regional trends and visibility conditions using monitoring data collected in or near Class I Areas across the United States. Originally, the national IMPROVE network was made up of approximately 30 sites at Class I areas. During 1999-2000 the number of sites increased to approximately 110. ADEQ, Pima County, and federal land managers at Arizona's Class I areas cooperatively operate the visibility monitoring network in Arizona. The current network is described in Table 4.12-1. In addition to the Class I IMPROVE monitors listed in Table 4.12- 1, ADEQ also operates one IMPROVE monitor at the Douglas Red Cross site, and collocated monitors at the JLG Supersite. The JLG Supersite serves as an urban IMPROVE monitor and has been used to provide comparative analysis with data from the CSN network. The Douglas Red Cross site may serve multiple objectives and its data will be evaluated in the upcoming year to determine if it continues to meet its designated purpose(s) or if it could be better utilized at another location. See the IMPROVE map in Appendix B for a spatial representation of the IMPROVE monitoring network and Class I areas within the state of Arizona.

ADEQ's 1996 monitoring plan for the Arizona Class I areas proposed adding optical (nephelometer) and wind-speed and direction meteorological monitoring equipment to existing IMPROVE sites to supplement data collected by the IMPROVE aerosol monitors. Those continuous measurements were intended to supplement the IMPROVE measurements and better characterize the air quality in these areas. Part of the motivation for installing integrating nephelometers at IMPROVE sites was a desire to use short term (five minutes) visibility estimates to model the visual experience of a visitor to a Class I area. A second motivation for installing nephelometers at IMPROVE sites was to provide input to mathematical algorithms that create values that can be compared with the IMPROVE measurements to test the performance of the IMPROVE algorithm. Both the original and the revised IMPROVEState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 35 algorithms tend to slightly over-estimate the lowest extinction values typical of the Arizona IMPROVE sites.

Table 4.12-1 2011 Arizona Class I Visibility Monitoring Network Geographic Area Represented Monitoring Location Background Meadview, Organ Pipe National Monument Chiricahua National Monument, Chiricahua Wilderness Area and Galiuro USFS Wilderness Chiricahua Entrance Station

Grand Canyon National Park Hance Camp and Indian Gardens Mazatzal and Pine Mountain USFS Wilderness Ike’s Backbone Mount Baldy Greer Water Treatment Plant Petrified Forest National Park Petrified Forest Saguaro National Park East Unit and West Unit Sierra Ancha USFS Wilderness Pleasant Valley Ranger Station Superstition USFS Wilderness Tonto National Monument, Queen Valley Sycamore Canyon USFS Wilderness Sycamore Canyon (Camp Raymond)

Due to budget constraints, ADEQ shut down the Class I nephelometer network in 2010. Over a decade of data were collected at several of these nephelometer sites. In early 2011, a draft summary report was written which summarizes the nephelometer data that were collected since 1997. The report provides comparisons of calculated visibility impairment between the IMPROVE aerosol monitors and collocated nephelometers. Summaries and trends in visibility data are also presented within the report, as well as meteorological data summaries in the form of wind roses. This report is meant to serve as a final data summary for the Class I Nephelometer network. Information from this report may be utilized in the future if further modifications are needed to the Arizona Class I visibility network.

4.13 Urban Haze Monitoring Network

Historically, ADEQ monitored the Phoenix and Tucson m etropolitan areas with a network of instruments to characterize and quantify the extent of urban haze. There are no established federal or state standards for acceptable levels of urban haze. ADEQ began studying the nature and causes of urban hazes by conducting studies during the winter of 1989-90 in Phoenix and during the winter of 1992-93 in Tucson. These studies recommended long-term, year-round monitoring of visibility. In 1993, ADEQ began deploying visibility monitoring equipment in Phoenix and Tucson. These visibility monitoring data are needed to provide policymakers and the public with information, track short and long-term trends, assess source contributions to urban haze, and better evaluate the effectiveness of air pollution control strategies. Equipment currently used to evaluate urban visibility includes transmissometers, nephelometers, particulate monitors, and digital camera systems.

The Phoenix urban haze network consists of a transmissometer for measuring light extinction along a fixed path length of four and a half kilometers, th ree nephelometers for measuring light scattering, five digital camera systems to record visual characteristics of the urban area, and particulate filters for quantifying and characterizing particulate matter.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 36 Due to budget constraints, the Tucson urban haze network was shut down in September, 2010. Approximately a decade of urban haze data were collected in the Tucson area. In early 2011, a draft summary report was written which summarizes the nephelometer and transmissometer data that were collected since 1997. The report provides summaries and trends in urban visibility data, as well as meteorological data summaries in the form of wind roses. This report is meant to serve as a final data summary for the Tucson Urban Haze network. Information from this report may be utilized in the future if further modifications are needed to the Urban Haze Network.

The current Phoenix urban haze sites (and their st atus) are described in Table 4.13-1. ADEQ continues to evaluate the Urban Haze program and is currently exploring the possibility of reallocation of the Phoenix visibility camera network to provide resources to additional areas around the state.

Table 4.13-1 Urban Haze Monitoring Network Site Name Parameter(s) Measured Phoenix Network - Operational ADEQ Building High Resolution Digital Camera Banner Mesa Medical Center High Resolution Digital Camera Dysart Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer Estrella Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer Estrella Mountain Community College 2 High Resolution Digital Cameras JLG Supersite IMPROVE North Mountain Summit High Resolution Digital Cameras Phoenix Transmissometer (Phoenix Baptist Hospital to Holiday Inn Hotel) Transmissometer (Bext)

Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer

4.14 Meteorology Monitoring Network

ADEQ operates meteorological equipm ent at selected sites throughout its network (Table 4.14-1). Some sites were originally established because other meteorology networks (NWS, AZMet, etc.) were not located near ADEQ's ambient air quality sites. As recommended in ADEQ’s Five-Year Network Assessment, ADEQ has begun to expand the meteorology monitoring network and standardize the meteorological measurements so that all sites collect measurements of wind speed, wind direction, temperature, and relative humidity. Currently, Ajo is the only meteorological site that does not have the full suite of meteorological instruments. A temperature / RH probe may be added to this site within the next year to compliment the current measurements of wind speed and wind direction.

Except for the items mentioned above ADEQ does not have any specific plans to make changes to the meteorological network, but may add additional mete orological equipment at existing SLAMS sites as resources and funding permit. At this time, ADEQ plans to only submit meteorological data that are required by 40 CFR Part 58.16 to EPA’s AQS database. If future resources allow additional meteorological data submittals to the AQS database, ADEQ may do so on a voluntary basis. A spatial representation of ADEQ’s meteorological monitori ng network can be found in Appendix B.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 37 Table 4.14-1 Meteorology Monitoring Network

Site Temp. Temp. Lapse Rate System Relative Humidity Wind Total Horizontal Solar Radiation Ultraviolet Solar Radiation Wind Profiler Report to AQS Comments

Ajo X No Globe Highway X X X No Hayden Old Jail X X X No

JLG Supersite X X X Yes For NCore / PAMS support Miami Golf Course X X X No Nogales Post Office X X X No Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant X X X No

Payson Well Site X X X No
Queen Valley X X X Yes For PAMS support Rillito X X X No Vehicle Emissions Laboratory X X X X X X X Solar only For PAMS support

Yuma Supersite X X X NoState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 38 5.0 MONITORING PLAN QUALITY ASSURANCE

EPA specifi es the quality assurance requirements for SLAMS, SPMs, and PSD air monitoring programs in 40 CFR 58 Appendix A. Data quality objectives, measurement quality objective and indicators, quality control (QC) checks for the monitors, calculations for data quality assessments, and data reporting requirements are part of the Air Assessment Section's (AAS) quality management system.

5.1 The Quality System

All environmental data operations (EDOs) contain som e level of uncertainty, or error, associated with them. The total measure of uncertainty is the sum of measurement error, which occurs in the data collection process, and population uncertainty, which relates to the representativeness of samples. ADEQ follows EPA’s quality system approach which uses data quality objectives (DQOs) which are developed prior to sampling in a program’s or pr oject’s planning phase. DQOs specify the amount of tolerable error that is not to be exceeded in order to make decisions using the air assessment data collected for each program’s or project’s specific purpose. To help meet DQOs, measurement quality objectives (MQOs), or performance constraints applied to air monitoring instruments, are used to keep measurement uncertainty within acceptable limits. Population uncertainty is controlled by proper site selection.

ADEQ serves as the Primary Quality Assurance Organization (PQAO) for the air monitoring stations it owns and operates. Being a PQAO streamlines Quality Assurance (QA) efforts by allowing meaningful measurement assessments to take place in a shorter period of time, by allowing expensive assessments such as collocated precision sampling and EPA-required performance evaluation (PE) audits such as the Performance Evaluation Program (PEP) and the National Performance Audit Program (NPAP) to take place at less sites and for results to be aggregated at higher levels that are representative of additional ADEQ sites.

As a PQAO, ADEQ uses precision and bias data from air monitoring instruments to assess how well we are achieving our established DQOs. Precision is defined as the measure of mutual agreement among individual measurements of the same property usually under prescribed similar conditions, and it is the random component of error. Precision data are generated from collocated sites and QC checks performed by the Air Monitoring Unit (AMU). Bias is the systematic or persistent distortion of a measurement process which causes error in one direction. It is determined by estimating the positive and negative deviation from the true value as a percentage of the true value. Bias data are generated from EPA and in-house PE audits.

The measurement uncertainty among all ADEQ stations monitoring for the same pollutant is expected to be reasonably homogeneous, as a result of common factors existing between those stations. Common factors typically include:

 stations being operated by a common team of field operators and according to a common set of field procedures (standard operating procedures (SOP)),

 common calibration facilities and standards,

 use of a common quality assurance program/project plan (QAPP),

 oversight by a common quality assurance organization, andState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 39  support by a common management, laboratory, or headquarters.

5.1.1 ADEQ Quality Assurance Staff

The QA Team is housed in the Data Management & Quality Assurance (DM&QA) Unit and is currently composed of two full-time employees specifically dedicated to QA/QC activities. The QA/QC Lead is a member of ADEQ's agency level QA team which is chaired by the agency’s QA/QC and Laboratory Services Manager.

The QA Team provides oversight and guidance on air monitoring activities to help ensure EPA's QA requirements are met. The QA Team primarily interacts with staff from the AMU and the Air Filter Laboratory (AFL) both of which are within the AAS.

The QA Team has numerous responsibilities that include, but are not necessarily limited to:

 Coordinating the preparation of quality documents such as Quality Assurance Program Plans (QAPrP) which are required by EPA Region 9 and/or Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPjP) and SOPs as required by EPA OAQPS for operating air monitoring equipment, sample handling, and sample processing,

 Conducting Technical Systems Audits (TSAs) of ADEQ air monitoring programs and laboratory services,

 Monitoring third-party laboratory performance on TSAs conducted by EPA,

 Conducting PE audits on ADEQ, source, and Pi nal County Air Quality Control District (PCAQCD) monitors, and

 Reviewing documents such as chain-of-custody forms, data forms, and instrument performance forms that relate to DQOs.

Detailed information on the QA Team’s activities is documented via an Annual Audit Report.

5.1.2 ADEQ Quality Documents

ADEQ has an agency-level Quality Management Plan (QMP) that is managed by the QA/QC Manager who reports to the General Services Section in the Administrative Services Division

. In 2010, the QA/QC Laboratory Services Manager submitted an updated QMP to EPA Region 9. This version was approved by the Region 9 Quality Assurance Administrator in November 2010. The QMP d escribes the quality managem ent processes ADEQ uses to maintain a quality management system that supports
program s involving environmental data or technology . The QMP is an “Umbrella” document which details in broad terms the strategies used to carry out QA/QC in environm ental data collection activities.

Per EPA Region 9 guidance, AAS submitted a draft QAPrP to EPA Region 9 in November 2001, which was not approved. This document provided a broad overview of all air monitoring programs AAS operates. This document is being replaced by individual QAPrPs which provide more detail for each major air monitoring program. QAPjPs are developed for environmental data operations of limited scope and duration, such as special studies, which have known beginning and anticipated end dates. These projects may involve single or multi-pollutant monitoring, and the QAPjPs may refer to theState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 40 r instrum ent. appropriate QAPrP for the pollutant to reduce duplication of effort. In practice, a QAPrP and a QAPjP

are comm only referred to as a Quality Assurance Program/Project Plan (QAPP).

In 2010, the QA/QC Lead along with staff from AMU began revising the National Air Toxics Trends Stations, Air Toxics Monitoring Program, & Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations QAPP which was approved by EPA Region 9 in February 2008. Completion of this QAPP was delayed due toa re-evaluation of priorities and the QAPP schedule was revised to focus first on criteria pollutantrelated QAPPs. In 2010, the QA Team began coordinating the development of a new QAPP for the new Pb monitoring program. This QAPP was submitted to EPA Region 9 as an Interim Final and was approved as such in October, 2011. The QA Team will finalize the Pb QAPP once sufficient information is available regarding the recently approved ERG analysis method. The team’s goal is to expedite the completion of the Gas, PM, and Pb QAPPs as soon as practicable, with a general goal of completing or updating one QAPP per year in addition to accomplishing other QA tasks.

The instruments used in the NCore program will be addressed in several program specific QAPPs that include, but may not be limited to: the PM 2.5 and PM 10 , Gaseous Pollutants, and Meteorological QAPPs. The QA Auditor will manage PE audits on these instruments.

AAS follows the EPA’s QAPP for the PM 2.5 STN monitoring program. This QAPP is undergoing update by the EPA OAQPS. Two samplers are used for collecting filter samples; the MetOne SuperSASS and the URG 3000. The QA Auditor conducts PE audits on the SuperSASS and URG 3000 four times per year (quarterly) pe

SOPs for ambient air quality monitors are included in QAPPs as well as at monitoring sites for technicians and operators. AAS SOPs are being re vised to follow EPA’s format provided in the Guidance for Preparing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) EPA QA/G-6 . The DM&QA Unit Manager, QA/QC Lead and the Document Control Specialist have been working on two new SOPs regarding the SOP development and document control processes. Both documents are near completion. The goal is to provide more guidance to staff creating or editing SOPs and to establish a new document control plan for AAS documents. In addition, DM& QA is developing a centralized storage area for the electronic versions of QAPPs and SOPs to ensure they are easily assessable for all. This change is expected to improve the usability of each SOP while streamlining the writing and review efforts.

5.2 Measurement Quality Checks – Precision and Bias Measurements

AMU QC checks and QA PE audits generate data used to assess the quality of the am bient air quality data collected by AAS. The QC checks are used to assess precision, or imprecision actually, introduced into air quality data by the monitoring system. The PE audits generate data used to assess the amount of bias introduced into air quality data by the monitor. For particulate matter monitors, collocated sampling generates precision data as well. The information glean ed from precision and bias data is important for data certification and user purposes. This QA inform ation is provided via the AMP 255 report which is generated by the EPA’s AQS database. The AMP 255 report is included in Appendix F of this plan to demonstrate QA completeness requirements as required in 40 CFR Part 58.10.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 41 The precision and bias data are reviewed for QA purposes by AMU and DM&QA staff to determine the quality of the ambient air data collected. Following reviews, the data are uploaded to the AQS database per 40 CFR 58 requirements for criteria pollutants.

5.2.1 Particulate Monitors – PM 10
ADEQ’s current network operates both filter-based and continuous monitors for measuring PM 10
. Currently, Partisol samplers are used for filter-based measurement and both TEOMs and BAMs are used for continuous measurements. Flow rate verifications are performed once every four weeks and instrument calibrations are performed at minimum once per year or more frequently if needed by AMU staff. The QA Auditor performs PE audits on these samplers once every six months.

Section 3.3.1 of 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A indicates that 15 percent of the filter-based PM 10 sites in a network must be collocated. The collocated monitors mu st be within four meters of each other and at least one meter apart for flow rates less than 200 liters/min. ADEQ has six filter-based PM 10 sites and according to the rule one collocated site is required. ADEQ operates collocated filter-based samplers at Payson Well Site to meet this collocation requirement. All concentrations from the collocated samplers are reported to the AQS with parameter occurrence code (POC) 2. Collocated samples are collected every sixth day for precision measurements. Histori cally, ADEQ has operated two collocated sites, but with the change from filter-based measurements to continuous at Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant, the need for collocation at Paul Spur was eliminated.

5.2.2 Particulate Monitors – PM 2.5
ADEQ’s current network operates both filter-based and continuous monitors for measuring PM 2.5
. Currently, Partisol samplers are used for filter-based measurements and TEOMs, BAMs and a few nephelometers are used for continuous measurements. Flow rate verifications are performed every four weeks and calibrations are performed annually or more frequently if needed by AMU. The QA Auditor performs PE audits on these monitors once every six months.

For the PM 2.5 network, each filter-based sampling method must include collocated sampling at 15 percent of the monitoring sites operated by the reporting agency. If the area has less than four monitoring sites at least one must have a precision measurement. ADEQ currently operates six PM 2.5 sites which results in one collocated site being required. This requirement is met with the collocation of Partisols at the Nogales Post Office site. Previously, collocated PM 2.5 sampling also occurred at the JLG Supersite; however, with the replacement of the Partisol 2025 instruments with a Partisol 2000 instrument, collocation will no longer be required at this site. Section 3.2.5.6 of 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A requires that the collocated monitors must be within four meters of each other and at least one meter apart for flow rates less than 200 liters/min. Collocated samples are collected every sixth day to ensure an adequate number of precision measurements. All concentrations from the collocated monitors are reported as POC 2. PEP audits are conducted on PM 2.5 filter-based samplers by the EPA. The PEP audit results are also used for measuring bias and are reported to AQS by the EPA. The ADEQ network has more than five filter-based sites, which requires eight PEP audits distributed evenly over four quarters. According to this schedule, all samplers will receive a PEP audit within a six year period.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 42 ADEQ operates two air samplers, the SuperSASS and the URG 3000, for the PM 2.5 STN as part of the CSN. Speciation filter samples are collected every third day. There is no collocation requirement for these samplers, but data generated from these samplers complement the data generated from the collocated IMPROVE samplers at JLG Supersite. Fl ow rate verifications are performed every four weeks and calibrations are performed annually or more frequently if needed. The QA Auditor audits each sampler quarterly. Beginning with 2010, all precision and bias measurements for the SuperSASS and URG are reported to the AQS by the Research Triangle Institute.

5.2.3 Gas Monitors – SO 2 , O 3 , CO, NO 2
One-point precision checks along with zero and span checks are conducted biweekly and multipoint verifications/calibrations are performed quarterly by AMU for all gas monitors. Multi-point PE audits are performed annually by QA. Both measurements are reported to the AQS. NPAP audits are conducted by EPA annually for bias measurements. NPAP results are reported to AQS by the EPA.Beginning in July 2010, the frequency of these audits increased and are now conducted on a semiannual basis.

All shelters for the gas monitors contain temperature probes. The shelter temperature is checked daily via the data collection system (DCS) to verify proper operating conditions for the monitors. Shelter temperatures are required to be between 20o and 30o C. Shelter temperature probes are audited once every six months by QA.

5.2.4 Air Toxics Monitors

ADEQ’s JLG Supersite in Phoenix is a designated air monitoring station for the NATTS program. AMU conducts verifications and calibrations on the samplers used to collect PM 10 metals, Polycyclic Aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and hexavalent chrome. Calibrations occur once every six months and verifications occur on a monthly or quarterly basis. QA conducts PE audits on the samplers once every six months. The VOC sampler is currently calibrated annually by ATEC and certified annually by ERG. The carbonyl sampler is currently calibrated annually by ATEC and certified annually by either ATEC or ERG.

ADEQ monitors VOCs for the Urban Air Toxics m onitoring program at Maricopa County’s South Phoenix site.

The QA auditor does not audit the carbonyl or VOC air toxics samplers which are returned to the manufacturer annually for certification. Audits are conducted on the Xonteck sampler which is used for collecting hexavalent chrome samples and the PUF which is used for collecting polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon samples.

5.2.5 Meteorological Equipment

Meteorological equipment is audited by the QA Team annually. The meteorological equipment at the designated NCore site will be audited once every six months.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 43 5.3 Calculations and Reporting

ADEQ submits the required AQS precision and bias report (AMP 255) to Region 9 in the annual Certification Letter per certification guidelines and CFR requirem ents. As stated above, all collocated particulate mater (PM) measurements are submitted quarterly to AQS as POC 2. AQS then calculates the precision statistics. The PM flow verification data and gaseous biweekly precision check data are submitted quarterly as precision records. Audit data for both PM monitors and gas monitors are also submitted quarterly.

5.4 ADEQ AQD Audit Responsibilities

The QA Team conducts PE audits of ADEQ m onitors, PCAQCD monitors that are included in the interagency agreement regarding PQAOs, and some source monitors.

5.4.1 Internal Technical System Audits

In 2010, the QA Team provided support and assistance to AMU in addressing the findings and recommendations from the Southern Regional Office (SRO) and Northern Regional Office (NRO) staff and operator TSAs. Corrective actions for a couple of complex findings are still in progress.

To date, the QA Auditor conducts audits on 12 IMPROVE samplers at 11 sites operating throughout the state annually. These audits are limited to evaluating site conditions and instrument performance with occasional operator interaction. Seven samplers are “protocol” samplers meaning they are owned by ADEQ. The other samplers are owned and operated by the National Park Service or the United States Forestry Service. Currently, ADEQ does not receive funds for the audits performed on IMPROVE samplers. This schedule was reviewed in 2011 and there have been no changes to the audit services provided for the IMPROVE program at this time.

In late 2009, the QA/QC Lead initiated the startup of an Air Toxics Team whose members include technicians from AMU, the QA Auditor, and the data management lead. The purpose of this team is to update the NATTS / ATMP / PAMS QAPP and instrument SOPs. The team meets on a regular basis to address issues related to air toxics sampling.

In mid-2010, the QA/QC Lead initiated the startup of a Pb Monitoring Team whose members include staff from Special Projects, AMU, the AFL, DM&QA as well as the manager of AAS. The purpose of the team was to ensure all pertinent staff were able to work together to develop program-related SOPs and the program QAPP.

In late 2011, the QA/QC Lead initiated the started up of a Gaseous Pollutant monitoring team which includes staff from DM&QA and AMU. The team is currently working on the Gaseous Pollutant QAPP and updating SOPs for gas analyzers.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 44 5.4.2 ADEQ Rankings in EPA Program Reports

In early 2009, the QA Team reviewed the report of EPA's PEP audit program. DM&QA staff began investigating what changes may have occurred within the PM 2.5 network to cause a shift in program performance over the last nine years. Based on EPA’s Three-Year Quality Assurance Reports for the SLAMS PM 2.5 Ambient Air Monitoring Program covering years 1999 through 2007, ADEQ's PM 2.5 network fell from a high rating to a low rating for bias results. While the information from the report is evaluated with caution due to the relatively low sample size used to summarize the results for Arizona, four areas are under review to identify and elimin ate possible source(s) of error occurring in the network: the sampler and impactor combination, the AFL gravimetric weighing process, operatortraining, and the PEP audit and data assessment process. To date, AFL has participated in three roundrobins in the Gravimetric Inter-Laboratory Comp arison Study conducted by the EPA’s National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory (NAREL) and scored well on each. AMU is currently working on updating their training procedures for those responsible for operating filter-based PM 10 and PM 2.5 instrumentation. Evaluation on the network will continue in an effort to reduce any bias that may present. ADEQ looks forward to reviewing the comprehensive PEP QA report that EPA is working on which summarizes data over a much larger time period.

5.4.3 Technical Assistance and QA Handbook Document Development

In 2010, the process of verifying flow standards used by AMU and QA underwent review. This review was initiated by the QA/QC Lead’s involvement as a reviewer on a new flow standard TAD by OAQPS. Currently, most AMU and QA flow standards are certif ied, or verified, annually. The calibrators used by QA for criteria pollutant gases and the O 3 standard are checked twice per year. All gas and flow rate standards used by AMU and the QA Team are traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) flow standard. The flow standard TAD draft has not been released for comment by EPA OAQPS at this time.

Throughout 2011, ADEQ DM&QA and AMU staff were actively involved in updating Volume II of EPA’s Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems. ADEQ staff participated in bi-monthly conference calls with EPA’s OAQPS staff, as well as EPA regional staff and other state and local monitoring staff. ADEQ continues to work w ith EPA and other state and local agency staff as the document is finalized in 2012. While ADEQ is currently working to establish program specific QAPPs for all air quality monitoring networks, the EPA QA Handbook serves as consistent guidance for AMU and DM&QA staff.

5.5 EPA Audit Responsibilities

EPA Headquarters and Region 9 each have authority to audit ADEQ's am bient air monitoring program.

5.5.1 PEP and NPAP Audits

In 2012, ADEQ will continue to participate in the EPA NPAP and the PM 2.5 and Pb PEP audits.State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 45 5.5.2 Technical System Audits

In April 2012 EPA Region 9 conducted a TSA of ADEQ’s air monitoring program. Findings and recommendations from the TSA will be reviewed by AAS staff and a Corrective Action Plan will be submitted to EPA Region 9 following the review. ADEQ will work with EPA Region 9 on the findings from the 2012 TSA. EPA Region 9 is required to conduct TSAs on the ADEQ monitoring program every three years.

In April 2010, ADEQ underwent a TSA of the NATTS program. The TSA was conducted by RTI, a contractor for EPA. A few outstanding findi ngs and recommendations are being addressed.

### Appendix A – Definitions and Abbreviations

AAAD Air Assessment Ambient Database AAS Air Assessment Section AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic ADEQ Arizona Department of Environmental Quality AFL Air Filter Lab AMU Air Monitoring Unit Auto GC/MS Automated Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer AQS Air Quality System (EPA database) BAM Beta Attenuation Monitor Bext Total Light Extinction Bscat Light Scattering CAA Clean Air Act CBSA Core Based Statistical Area CEDES Commission for Ecology and Sustainable Development CFR Code of Federal Regulations CIA Class I area CO Carbon Monoxide CSN Chemical Speciation Network DCS Data Collection System DM&QA Data Management and Quality Assurance Unit DQO Data Quality Objective E-BAM Environmental Proof - Beta Attenuation Monitor EDO Environmental Data Operation EPA Environmental Protection Agency FEM Federal Equivalent Method FRM Federal Reference Method HAP Hazardous Air Pollutants ICPMS Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry IMPROVE Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments MCAQD Maricopa County Air Quality Department MET Meteorological Measurements (wind, temperature, relative humidity) MQO Measurement Quality Objective MSA Metropolitan Statistical Area
μ g/m 3 Micrograms per Cubic Meter NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standard NAREL National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory NATA National Air Toxics Assessment NATTS National Air Toxics Trends Station NCore National Core multipollutant monitoring stations NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology NM National Monument NO 2 Nitrogen Dioxide NOx Nitrogen oxides NOy Reactive Nitrogen Oxides
State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 46State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2011, Page 47 NPAP National Performance Audit Program NPS National Park Service NRO Northern Regional Office NWS National Weather Service O 3 Ozone OAQPS Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards PAHs Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons PAMS Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Station Pb Lead PCAQCD Pinal County Air Quality Control District PDEQ Pima County Department of Environmental Quality PE Performance Evaluation PEP Performance Evaluation Program PM Particulate Matter PM 10 Particulate Matter < 10 microns PM coarse Coarse Particulate Matter 2.5 to 10 microns aerodynamic diameter PM 2.5 Particulate Matter < 2.5 microns POC Parameter Occurrence Code ppb Parts Per Billion ppm Parts Per Million PQAO Primary Quality Assurance Organization PSD Prevention of Significant Deterioration PWEI Populated Weighted Emissions Index QA Quality Assurance QAPP Quality Assurance Program and/or Project Plan QAPjP Quality Assurance Program Plan QAPrP Quality Assurance Project Plan QC Quality Control QMP Quality Management Plan RASS Radar Acoustic Sounding System SEMARNAT Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources SIP State Implementation Plan SLAMS State and Local Air Monitoring Stations SO 2 Sulfur Dioxide SOP Standard Operating Procedure SPM Special Purpose Monitor SRO Southern Regional Office STN Speciation Trends Network TAD Technical Assistance Document TEOM Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance TSA Technical System Audit USFS United States Forest Service VOC Volatile Organic Compound

### Appendix B – Network Maps

There are eleven maps in this section illustra ting the location of ADEQ and Source monitors:

 CO Network

 NO 2 Network

 O 3 Network

 SO 2 Network

 Pb Network

 PM 10 Network

 PM 2.5 Network

 PM 2.5 EBAM Network

 Meteorological Network

 Urban Visibility Network

 IMPROVE Network & Class I Wilderness areas

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 48State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 49State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 50State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 51State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 52State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 53State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 54State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 55State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 56State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 57State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 58State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 59

### Appendix C – Current Monitors by Program or Network

This appendix contains detailed information about monitors that are operated by ADEQ, or monitors that ADEQ has a strong association with (e.g. IMPROVE monitors). Only those monitors that are in operation at the time that this network plan was creat ed are included in this a ppendix. Monitors that are proposed to be installed or those th at were discontinued prior to the cr eation of this network plan are not included in this appendix. Since in dividual pollutants or networks have specific monitoring or siting criteria, this appendix was created so that siting criteria can be easily identified and evaluated throughout a program or network. See Appendix D for detail ed information on specific monitoring sites.

NON-REGULATORY NETWORKS Meteorology Temp/RH...................................................................................................................... ..................63 Wind......................................................................................................................... ......................65 Special Purpose Monitors (SPM).........................................................................................................67

NAAQS-RELATED NETWORKS State & Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) CO........................................................................................................................... .......................68 NO 2
............................................................................................................................... .................69 O 3
............................................................................................................................... ....................70 SO 2
............................................................................................................................... ..................71 Pb ........................................................................................................................... ........................72 PM 10
............................................................................................................................... ................73 PM 2.5
............................................................................................................................... ...............75 National Core Multi-Pollutan t Monitoring Stations (NCore)........................................................76 Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) ............................................................78 Special Purpose Monitors (SPM).........................................................................................................80

SPECIATION TRENDS NETWORK (STN) ...........................................................................................81

AIR TOXICS National Air Toxics Trends Sites (NATTS) ...................................................................................... ..82 Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program (UATMP)..............................................................................83

VISIBILITY Urban Haze Camera ....................................................................................................................... ....................84 Nephelometer................................................................................................................. ................85 Transmissometer.............................................................................................................. ..............86 Temp/RH...................................................................................................................... ..................87 Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) ..........................................88

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 60Definitions for Appendix C – Current Monitors by Program or Network

Monitor The pollutant(s ) or the atmospheric pa rameter(s) being monitored at the site CBSA Core Based Statistical Area that the site is located within. A CBSA is a U.S. geographic area defined by th e Office of Management and Budget based around an urban center of at least 10,000 people and adjacent areas that are socioeconomically tie d to the urban center by commuting. Site Official name for the site as wr itten in ADEQ’s AZURITE / AAAD database Objective A brief description of the inte nded purpose of the monitor’s measurements (maximum concentration, population exposure, sourceoriented, background, transport, visibility or welfare based) Spatial scale Area represented by an air quality monitor (microscale: 0 – 100 m, middle scale: 0.1 – 0.5 km, neighborhood: 0.5 – 4 km, urban: 4 – 50 km, regional: ~50 – 500 km, or national/global) Monitor start date Date that a pollutant, parameter, or measurement was started at the site Instrument Specific make and model of physical d evise used to collect air samples or take measurements Instrument start date The date that the current type of instrument (i.e. method) began operation at the site Instrument location The physical location of the instrume nt within the site (e.g. rooftop, shelter, tower, etc.) Analysis method The method used to analyze collected pollutant or collect measurements Method code An AQS code representing a particular method for collecting samples of the specified pollutant parameter Sampling schedule Frequency the instrument collects samples or measurements (e.g. hourly, daily, 1-in-3, 1-in-6, etc.) Sampling duration Length of time instrument collects samples or measurements (e.g. 1- hour, 24-hour, etc.) Sampling season Period that the instrument collects samples or measurements throughout a given year (typically ex pressed as a range of months) Probe height from ground Distance the probe is from the ground in meters (O 3 and SO 2 probes must be between 2 and 15 meters; ot hers pollutants must be between 2 to 7 meters; meteorology typically 2 or 10 meters) Probe distance from
structure Horizontal or vertical distance probe is from the supporting structure in
meters

Probe material Type of material probe is made of (SO 2 , NO 2 , O 3 must have FEP Teflon or borosilicate glass; PAMS and VOCs must be borosilicate glass or stainless steel)

Residence time Number of seconds it takes a sample of air to travel from the inlet to the instrument (reactive gases must be less than 20 seconds) Distance from obstructions Distance the instrument is from th e closest obstruction(s) in meters (probes and inlets must be at least 1 meter from obstructions) Distance from trees Distance the instrument is from th e nearest tree in meters (must be a minimum of 10 meters from drip line)

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 61State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 62 Unrestricted airflow degrees Angular measure (in degrees) of the area around an instrument that is free from obstructions (minimum of 270°) Distance between collocated monitors Distance between the centers of collo cated instruments in meters (must be between 1 and 4 meters) In climate controlled shelter? An indication as to whether the site has a climate cont rolled area for the particular monitor (Yes or No) One-point QC check frequency Frequency at which zero/span/prec ision checks occur for gaseous instruments (daily, weekl y, bi-weekly, monthly) Flow rate verification frequency Frequency at which flow rate verifications occur for particulate instruments (daily, weekl y, bi-weekly, monthly) Monitor audit frequency Frequency at which independent performance audits occur (quarterly, biannually, annual) PEP audit monitor? An indication as to whether a PM 2.5 or Pb monitor should be subjected to Performance Evaluation Pr ogram audits (Yes or No) NPAP audit monitor? An indication as to whether a gaseous monitor should be subjected to National Performance Audit Program audits (Yes or No) Data Submitted to AQS? An indication as to whether data from the monitor are loaded to EPA’s AQS Database (Yes or No) Data Submitted to AirNOW? An indication as to whether data from the monitor are loaded to the AirNOW database (Yes or No) Protocol Site? An indication as to whether an IMP ROVE monitor / site is a Protocol Site (Yes or No)CBSAPayson PaysonPhoenix-MesaScottsdale PaysonNogalesSiteGlobe HighwayHayden OldJail JLG SupersiteMiami GolfCourseNogales PostOfficeObjectivePopulation Population Population PopulationPopulationSpatial scaleMiddle Neighborhood Neighborhood MiddleNeighborhoodMonitor start date4/15/2011 2/2/2011 7/1/1993 6/8/2011 8/11/2011InstrumentVaisala HMP155 ProbeVaisala HMP45C ProbeRotronicsMP101AProbeVaisala HMP155 ProbeVaisala HMP45C ProbeInstrument Start Date4/15/2011 2/2/2011 1/15/20106/8/2011 8/11/2011Instrument LocationTower Tower Tower TowerTowerAnalysis methodNone None None NoneNoneMethod code----------Sampling scheduleContinuous Continuous Continuous ContinuousContinuousSampling durationHourlyHourlyHourlyHourlyHourlySampling seasonAll yearAll yearAll yearAll yearAll yearProbe height from ground 2 m 2.3 m 2 m 2 m 5.2 mProbe distance from structure 1 m 0.6 m1 m1 m3 mDistance from obstructions 32 m 0.6 m 8 m-- 13.1 mDistance from trees 36 m 4.3 m 5 m 5 m7.3 mUnrestricted airflow degrees360°150° 210° 90°360°In climate-controlled shelter?NNNNNMonitor audit frequencyAnnual Annual Annual Annual AnnualData submitted to AQS? N N Y N NData submitted to AirNOW?NNNNNMeteorology - Temp/RHState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 63CBSASierra VistaDouglas PaysonPhoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Pima YumaSitePaul SpurChemical LimePlantPayson WellSite Queen Valley RillitoYumaSupersiteObjectiveSource PopulationPopulationSource PopulationSpatial scaleMiddle NeighborhoodNeighborhoodNeighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor start date12/1/2011 5/30/1991 6/23/2003 3/30/2010 3/17/2010InstrumentVaisala HMP155 ProbeVaisala HMP45C ProbeVaisala HMP45C ProbeVaisala HMP45C ProbeVaisala HMP155 ProbeInstrument Start Date12/1/2011 6/19/20034/19/20113/30/2010 3/17/2010Instrument LocationTower TowerTowerTower TowerAnalysis methodNone NoneNoneNone NoneMethod code-- -- -- -- --Sampling scheduleContinuous ContinuousContinuousContinuous ContinuousSampling durationHourly HourlyHourlyHourly HourlySampling seasonAll year All yearAll yearAll year All yearProbe height from ground2.7 m3 m 2.4 m 2 m 2 mProbe distance from structure0.9 m 1 m 1 m 1 m 1 mDistance from obstructions2 m 7 m7.3 m1 m 1 mDistance from trees9 m 5 m1.2 m18 m--Unrestricted airflow degrees360° 250° 180° 360° 220°In climate-controlled shelter? N NNN NMonitor audit frequencyAnnual Annual Annual Annual AnnualData submitted to AQS? N N Y N NData submitted to AirNOW?NNNNNMeteorology - Temp/RH - continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 64CBSATucsonPayson PaysonPhoenix-MesaScottsdale PaysonNogalesSiteAjo Globe Highway Hayden Old Jail JLG Supersite Miami Golf CourseNogales PostOfficeObjectivePopulation Population Population Population Population PopulationSpatial scaleNeighborhood Middle Neighborhood Neighborhood Middle NeighborhoodMonitor start date7/1/1969 4/15/2011 2/2/2011 7/1/1993 6/8/2011 1/1/1980InstrumentRM Young 5103AnemometerRM Young 5103AnemometerRM Young 5103AnemometerRM Young 5103AnemometerRM Young 5305AnemometerRM Young 5103AnemometerInstrument Start Date6/11/2003 4/15/2011 2/2/2011 7/1/1993 6/8/2011 6/13/2003Instrument LocationTowerTowerTowerTowerTowerPoleAnalysis methodNone None None None None NoneMethod code40 40 40 40 40 40Sampling scheduleContinuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous ContinuousSampling durationHourly Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly HourlySampling seasonAll year All year All year All year All year All yearProbe height from ground11.3 m 10 m 10 m 10 m 10 m 12 mDistance from obstructions-- -- -- 8 m -- --Distance from trees9 m -- 2 m 5 m 10 m --Unrestricted airflow degrees360° 360° 360° 360° 360° 360°In climate-controlled shelter?NNNNNNMonitor audit frequencyAnnualAnnualAnnualBiannualAnnualAnnualData submitted to AQS?NNNYNNData submitted to AirNOW?NNNNNNMeteorology - WindState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 65CBSASierra VistaDouglasPaysonPhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleTucsonPhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleYumaSitePaul SpurChemical LimePlant Payson Well Site Queen Valley RillitoVehicle EmissionsLaboratory Yuma SupersiteObjectiveSource Population Population Source Population PopulationSpatial scaleMiddle Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor start date12/1/2011 5/30/1991 6/23/2003 1/8/2004 5/11/1999 3/17/2010InstrumentRM Young 5305AnemometerRM Young 5103AnemometerRM Young 5103AnemometerRM Young 5103AnemometerRM Young 5305AnemometerRM Young 5305AnemometerInstrument Start Date12/1/2011 5/30/1991 4/19/2011 1/8/2004 5/11/1999 3/17/2010Instrument LocationTower Tower Tower Tower Tower TowerAnalysis methodNone None None None None NoneMethod code40 40 40 40 40 40Sampling scheduleContinuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous ContinuousSampling durationHourly Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly HourlySampling seasonAll year All year All year All year All year All yearProbe height from ground10 m 10 m 10 m 10 m 10 m 10 mDistance from obstructions-- 7 m 73 m 20 m 30 m 50 mDistance from trees9 m 5 m -- 20 m 50 m --Unrestricted airflow degrees360° 360° 360° 360° 360° 360°In climate-controlled shelter?NNNNNNMonitor audit frequencyAnnualAnnualAnnualAnnualAnnualAnnualData submitted to AQS?NNYNNNData submitted to AirNOW?NNNNNNMeteorology - Wind - continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 66MonitorPM2.5PM2.5PM2.5PM2.5PM2.5PM2.5PM2.5CBSAFlagstaff NogalesPrescott FlagstaffNavajoNonePrescottSiteFlagstaff MiddleSchoolNogales PostOfficePrescott CollegeAQDSedona FireStation AQD Show Low SpringervilleVerde RangerStationObjectivePopulation Population Population Population Population Population PopulationSpatial scaleNeighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor start date8/27/2001 4/1/1999 7/13/2011 12/16/2011 6/8/2011 6/8/2011 8/2/2011InstrumentMet One E-BAMMet One 1020BAMMet One E-BAM Met One E-BAM Met One E-BAM Met One E-BAM Met One E-BAMInstrument Start Date7/14/20112/2/20047/13/201112/16/20116/8/2011 6/8/2011 8/2/2011Instrument LocationRooftopRooftopRooftopRooftopRooftopRooftop Metal PlatformAnalysis methodBeta RayAttenuationBeta RayAttenuationBeta RayAttenuationBeta RayAttenuationBeta RayAttenuationBeta RayAttenuationBeta RayAttenuationMethod code--731----------Sampling scheduleContinuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous ContinuousSampling durationHourlyHourlyHourlyHourlyHourlyHourlyHourlySampling seasonAll yearAll yearAll yearAll yearAll yearAll yearAll yearProbe height from ground6 m8 m6 m3.6 m5 m8 m3.5 mProbe distance from structure--------------Distance from obstructions10 m11.9 m--3 m------Distance from trees15 m10 m7 m--10 m30 m30 mUnrestricted airflow degrees300°300°250°300°220°250°360°In climate-controlled shelter?NYNNNNNFlow-rate verification frequencyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonitor audit frequency--Biannual----------Data submitted to AQS?NYNNNNNData submitted to AirNOW?NYNNNNNNon-regulatory - SPMState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 67CBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdaleSite JLG SupersiteObjective PopulationSpatial scale NeighborhoodMonitor start date 7/1/1993InstrumentEcotech EC 9830CO AnalyzerInstrument Start Date 12/15/2011Instrument Location ShelterAnalysis methodGas FilterCorrelationMethod code 588Sampling schedule ContinuousSampling duration HourlySampling seasonAll YearProbe height from ground5 mProbe materialBorosilicate GlassFunnel / FEPTeflon SampleLineResidence time16.14 secDistance from obstructions 8 mDistance from trees 5 mUnrestricted airflow degrees 210°In climate-controlled shelter?YOne-point QC check frequency Every 2 weeksMonitor audit frequencyAnnualNPAP audit monitor?YData submitted to AQS? YData submitted to AirNOW? YNAAQS - SLAMS - COState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 68CBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdaleSite JLG SupersiteObjective PopulationSpatial scale NeighborhoodMonitor start date 7/1/1993InstrumentThermo 42C NOxAnalyzerInstrument Start Date 7/1/1993Instrument Location ShelterAnalysis methodChemiluminescenceMethod code 74Sampling schedule ContinuousSampling duration HourlySampling seasonAll YearProbe height from ground5 mProbe distance from structure 2mProbe materialBorosilicate GlassFunnel / FEPTeflon SampleLineResidence time 15.69 secDistance from obstructions 8 mDistance from trees 5 mUnrestricted airflow degrees 210°In climate-controlled shelter?YOne-point QC check frequency Every 2 weeksMonitor audit frequencyAnnualNPAP audit monitor?YData submitted to AQS?YData submitted to AirNOW?NNAAQS - SLAMS - NO2State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 69CBSANone FlagstaffPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePrescottPhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePaysonYumaSiteAlamo LakeFlagstaff MiddleSchool JLG SupersitePrescott CollegeAQD Queen ValleyTonto NationalMonument Yuma SupersiteObjectiveTransport Population Population Population Transport Transport PopulationSpatial scaleRegional Neighborhood Urban Neighborhood UrbanUrban NeighborhoodMonitor start date5/20/2005 3/13/2008 7/1/1993 3/25/2008 1/1/1998 5/22/2002 5/6/2008InstrumentTeledyne API400E O3 AnalyzerTeledyne API400E O3 AnalyzerTeledyne API400E O3 AnalyzerThermo 49C O3AnalyzerTeledyne API400E O3 AnalyzerTeledyne API400E O3 AnalyzerTeledyne API400E O3 AnalyzerInstrument Start Date3/10/2011 3/11/2011 4/1/2011 2/10/2012 3/16/2011 3/16/2011 3/3/2011Instrument LocationShelterShelterShelterShelterShelterShelterShelterAnalysis methodUV Photometric UV Photometric UV Photometric UV Photometric UV Photometric UV Photometric UV PhotometricMethod code087087087047087087087Sampling scheduleContinuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous ContinuousSampling durationHourlyHourlyHourlyHourlyHourlyHourlyHourlySampling seasonMarch – Oct. March – Oct. All Year March – Oct. March – Oct. March – Oct. March – Oct.Probe height from ground5 m10 m5 m6 m5 m6 m5 mProbe distance from structure2 m0.5 m------2 m2 mProbe materialBorosilicate GlassFunnel / FEPTeflon SampleLineBorosilicate GlassFunnel / FEPTeflon SampleLineBorosilicate GlassFunnel / FEPTeflon SampleLineBorosilicate GlassFunnel / FEPTeflon SampleLineBorosilicate GlassFunnel / FEPTeflon SampleLineBorosilicate GlassFunnel / FEPTeflon SampleLineBorosilicate GlassFunnel / FEPTeflon SampleLineResidence time2.95 sec 8.66 sec 15.71 sec 3.60 sec 3.46 sec 3.53 sec 4.99 secDistance from obstructions7 m--8 m--73 m--35 mDistance from trees12 m15 m5 m12 m3 m4 m--Unrestricted airflow degrees360°360°210°250°360°360°360°In climate-controlled shelter?YYYYYYYOne-point QC check frequencyEvery 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeksMonitor audit frequencyAnnualAnnualAnnualAnnualAnnualAnnualAnnualNPAP audit monitor?YYYYYYYData submitted to AQS?YYYYYYYData submitted to AirNOW?YYYYYYYNAAQS - SLAMS - O3State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 70CBSAPaysonPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePaysonSiteHayden Old Jail JLG Supersite Miami RidgelineObjectiveSource Population SourceSpatial scaleNeighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor start date1/1/1975 3/3/2005 10/5/1995InstrumentThermo 43CSO2 AnalyzerEcotech EC 9850SO2 AnalyzerThermo 43CSO2 AnalyzerInstrument Start Date10/10/2001 6/1/2010 7/21/1999Instrument LocationShelterShelterShelterAnalysis methodPulsedFluorescencePulsedFluorescencePulsedFluorescenceMethod code6059260Sampling scheduleContinuous Continuous ContinuousSampling durationHourlyHourlyHourlySampling seasonAll yearAll yearAll yearProbe height from ground5 m 5 m 4 mProbe distance from structure7 m -- 2 mProbe materialBorosilicate GlassFunnel / FEPTeflon SampleLineBorosilicate GlassFunnel / FEPTeflon SampleLineBorosilicate GlassFunnel / FEPTeflon SampleLineResidence time4.85 sec 15.64 sec 5.13 secDistance from obstructions7 m 8 m 5 mDistance from trees4.2 m 5 m 5 mUnrestricted airflow degrees360° 210° 180°In climate-controlled shelter? Y Y YOne-point QC check frequencyEvery 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeksMonitor audit frequencyAnnualAnnualAnnualNPAP audit monitor?YYYData submitted to AQS?YYYData submitted to AirNOW?YYYNAAQS - SLAMS - SO2State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 71CBSAPayson PaysonPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePaysonSiteGlobe Highway Globe Highway JLG Supersite Miami Golf CourseObjectiveSourceSource Population SourceSpatial scaleMiddleMiddle Neighborhood MiddleMonitor start date10/1/2010 10/1/2010 1/1/2005 10/1/2010InstrumentTisch TE-8550-BLTSPTisch TE-8550-BLTSP R&P Partisol 2000Tisch TE-8550-BLTSPInstrument Start Date10/1/2010 10/1/2010 1/1/2005 10/1/2010Instrument LocationPlatform Platform Metal Roof PlatformAnalysis methodICP-MS with HeatedUltrasonic Nitric andHydrochloric Acid FilterExtraction (TSP)ICP-MS with HeatedUltrasonic Nitric andHydrochloric Acid FilterExtraction (TSP)ICP-MS with HeatedHot Block in Dilute Acidand Hydrogen PeroxideFilter Extraction (PM10)ICP-MS with HeatedUltrasonic Nitric andHydrochloric Acid FilterExtraction (TSP)Method code191 191 202 191Sampling schedule1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6Sampling duration24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hourSampling seasonAll year All year All year All yearProbe height from ground2.5 m 2.5 m 5 m 3.5 mProbe distance from structure-- -- -- --Distance from obstructions3.7 m 3.7 m 8 m --Distance from trees1.5 m 1.5 m 5 m 4 mUnrestricted airflow degrees 330330° 210° 180°Distance between collocatedmonitors1.8 m 1.8 m -- --In climate-controlled shelter?NNNNFlow-rate verification frequencyEvery 12 days Every 12 days Monthly Every 12 daysMonitor audit frequencyQuarterly Quarterly Biannual QuarterlyPEP audit monitor?Y YNYData submitted to AQS?YYYYData submitted to AirNOW?NNNNNAAQS - SLAMS - PbState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 72CBSATucsonLake Havasu CityKingmanSierra Vista-DouglasFlagstaffPaysonPhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleNogalesSiteAjoBullhead CityDouglas RedCrossFlagstaff MiddleSchool Hayden Old Jail JLG SupersiteNogales PostOfficeObjectivePopulation Population Population Population Source Population PopulationSpatial scaleNeighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor start date2/11/1991 11/5/1997 9/2/1998 10/30/1996 1/6/1981 7/1/1993 1/1/1980InstrumentR&P 1400ABTEOM R&P Partisol 2000 R&P Partisol 2000 R&P Partisol 2000R&P 1400 ABTEOMMet One 1020BAMThermo Partisol2000Instrument Start Date2/19/2009 9/2/2003 4/1/2004 4/1/2004 3/3/200911/10/20108/27/2003Instrument LocationMetal Platform Rooftop Metal Platform Rooftop Rooftop Shelter RooftopAnalysis methodTapered ElementOscillatingMicrobalanceTechnologyGravimetric Gravimetric GravimetricTapered ElementOscillatingMicrobalanceTechnologyBeta RayAttenuationGravimetricMethod code79 126 126 126 79122126Sampling scheduleContinuous 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 Continuous Continuous 1 in 6Sampling durationHourly 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour Hourly Hourly 24 hourSampling seasonAll Year All year All year All year All year All year All yearProbe height from ground3.5 m 5 m 3 m 6 m 5 m 5m 8 mProbe distance from structure-- -- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions6.7 m -- 12 m 10 m 8 m 8 m 13.7 mDistance from trees9 m 11 m 6 m 15 m 15 m 5 m 7 mUnrestricted airflow degrees360° 360° 320° 300° 360° 210° 300°Distance between collocatedmonitors-- -- -- -- -- -- --In climate-controlled shelter? Y N N N Y Y NFlow-rate verification frequencyMonthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly MonthlyMonitor audit frequencyBiannual Biannual Biannual Biannual Biannual Biannual BiannualData submitted to AQS?YYYYYYYData submitted to AirNOW? Y N N N Y Y NNAAQS - SLAMS - PM10State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 73CBSASierra VistaDouglasSierra Vista-DouglasPayson Payson Prescott Tucson YumaSitePaul SpurChemical LimePlantPaul SpurChemical LimePlant Payson Well Site Payson Well Site Prescott Valley Rillito Yuma SupersiteObjectiveSource Source Population Population Population SourcePopulationSpatial scaleMiddle Middle Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodNeighborhoodMonitor start date1/6/1991 1/6/1991 1/1/1991 1/1/1991 3/16/2003 1/3/1985 12/1/2009InstrumentThermo Partisol2000R&P 1400 ABTEOM R&P Partisol 2000Thermo Partisol2000 R&P Partisol 2000R&P 1400 ABTEOMR&P 1400 ABTEOMInstrument Start Date12/16/1997 1/12/2012 6/30/2003 7/1/2009 12/28/2007 3/30/201012/1/2009Instrument LocationMetal Platform Metal Platform Metal Platform Metal Platform Rooftop Metal PlatformShelterAnalysis methodGravimetric Gravimetric Gravimetric Gravimetric GravimetricTapered ElementOscillatingMicrobalanceTechnologyTapered ElementOscillatingMicrobalanceTechnologyMethod code12679126 126 12679 79Sampling schedule1 in 6Continuous1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6Continuous ContinuousSampling duration24 hour Hourly 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour Hourly HourlySampling seasonAll year All year All year All year All year All yearAll yearProbe height from ground3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m 7 m 5 m5 mProbe distance from structure-- -- -- -- -- --2 mDistance from obstructions50 m 50 m 12 m 12 m 20 m 4 m50 mDistance from trees5 m 5 m 5 m 5 m -- 20 m --Unrestricted airflow degrees360° 360° 300° 300° 360° 360° 360°Distance between collocatedmonitors-- -- 2 m 2 m -- -- --In climate-controlled shelter? N Y N N N YYFlow-rate verification frequencyMonthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly MonthlyMonthlyMonitor audit frequencyBiannual Biannual Biannual Biannual Biannual BiannualBiannualData submitted to AQS?YYYYYYYData submitted to AirNOW? N Y N N N Y YNAAQS - SLAMS - PM10 continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 74CBSASierra VistaDouglasFlagstaffPhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleNogales NogalesSiteDouglas RedCrossFlagstaff MiddleSchool JLG Supersite JLG SupersiteNogales PostOfficeNogales PostOfficeObjectivePopulation Population Population Population Population PopulationSpatial scaleNeighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor start date11/2/2000 8/27/2001 7/1/2003 7/1/2003 4/1/1999 4/1/1999InstrumentR&P Partisol 2000 R&P Partisol 2000 R&P Partisol 2000Met One 1020BAM R&P Partisol 2000 R&P Partisol 2000Instrument Start Date4/1/2004 9/16/2003 7/1/201111/10/20109/26/2003 9/26/2003Instrument LocationMetal Platform Rooftop Metal Roof ShelterRooftopRooftopAnalysis methodGravimetric Gravimetric GravimetricBeta RayAttenuationGravimetric GravimetricMethod code143143143170143143Sampling schedule1 in 61 in 61 in 3 Continuous 1 in 61 in 6Sampling duration24 hour24 hour24 hourHourly24 hour24 hourSampling seasonAll yearAll yearAll YearAll yearAll yearAll yearProbe height from ground3 m6 m5 m5m8 m7 mProbe distance from structure------------Distance from obstructions9 m10 m8 m8 m10.4 m8 mDistance from trees6 m15 m5 m5 m12 m10 mUnrestricted airflow degrees320°300°210°210°300°300°Distance between collocatedmonitors--------2 m2 mIn climate-controlled shelter?NNNYNNFlow-rate verification frequencyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonitor audit frequencyBiannual Biannual Biannual Biannual Biannual BiannualPEP audit monitor?Y Y Y -- Y YData submitted to AQS? YYYYYYData submitted to AirNOW? N N N Y N NNAAQS - SLAMS - PM2.5State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 75MonitorCO NOy O3 SO2 Pb-PM10 PM10-2.5CBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleSite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG SupersiteObjective Population Population Population PopulationPopulationPopulationSpatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodNeighborhoodNeighborhoodMonitor start date7/1/1993 1/1/2011 7/1/1993 3/3/2005 1/1/2005 11/10/2010InstrumentEcotech 9830CO AnalyzerEcotech 9843Reactive NOxAPI TeledyneM400E O3AnalyzerEcotech 9850SO2 Analyzer R&P Partisol 2000Paired Met One1020 BAMsInstrument Start Date 12/15/2011 4/1/20114/1/20116/1/20101/1/200511/10/2010Instrument Location Shelter Shelter Shelter ShelterMetal RoofShelterAnalysis methodGas FilterCorrelationChemiluminescence UV PhotometricPulsedFluorescenceICP-MS with HeatedHot Block in Dilute Acidand Hydrogen PeroxideFilter ExtractionDifference MethodMethod code 588 591 087 592202185Sampling schedule Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous1 in 6ContinuousSampling duration Hourly Hourly Hourly Hourly24 hourHourlySampling season All year All year All year All yearAll yearAll yearProbe height from ground 5 m 5 m 5 m 5 m5 m 5mProbe distance from structure 2 m 7 m 2 m 2 m-- --Probe materialBorosilicate GlassFunnel / FEPTeflon SampleLineBorosilicate GlassFunnel / FEPTeflon SampleLineBorosilicate GlassFunnel / FEPTeflon SampleLineBorosilicate GlassFunnel / FEPTeflon SampleLine-- --Residence time 16.14 sec 13.08 sec 15.71 sec 15.64 sec-- --Distance from obstructions 8 m 8 m 8 m 8 m8 m 8 mDistance from trees 5 m 5 m 5 m 5 m5 m 5 mUnrestricted airflow degrees 210° 210° 210° 210°210° 210°In climate-controlled shelter?YYYYNNOne-point QC check frequency Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks -- --Flow-rate verification frequency -- -- -- --MonthlyMonthlyMonitor audit frequency Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeksBiannual--PEP audit monitor?NNNNNNNPAP audit monitor? Y N Y Y N NData submitted to AQS?YYYYYYData submitted to AirNOW?YYYYNNNAAQS - NCoreState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 76MonitorPM2.5 PM2.5 PM2.5 Speciation PM2.5 Speciation Temp/RH WindCBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleSite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG SupersiteObjective Population Population Population Population Population PopulationSpatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor start date7/1/20037/1/2003 2/21/2000 2/21/2000 7/1/1993 7/1/1993Instrument R&P Partisol 2000Met One 1020BAMMet One SuperSASS URG 3000NRotronics MP101AProbeRM Young 5103AnemometerInstrument Start Date 7/1/2011 11/10/2010 2/21/2000 10/1/2009 1/15/2010 7/1/1993Instrument Location Metal Roof Metal Roof Metal Roof Metal Roof Tower TowerAnalysis method GravimetricBeta RayAttenuationEnergy DispersiveXRF & IonChromatographyIMPROVE A TOR& Various None NoneMethod code 145 170 811 & 812831, 838, &Various 21 40Sampling schedule 1 in 3 Continuous 1 in 3 1 in 3 Continuous ContinuousSampling duration 24 hour Hourly 24 hour 24 hour Hourly HourlySampling season All year All year All year All year All year All yearProbe height from ground 5 m 5 m 5 m 5 m 2 m 10 mProbe distance from structure -- -- -- -- -- --Probe material---- -- -- -- --Residence time---- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions 8 m 8 m 8 m 8 m 8 m 8 mDistance from trees 5 m 5 m 5 m 5 m 5 m 5 mUnrestricted airflow degrees 210° 210° 210° 210° 210° 360°In climate-controlled shelter?NNNNNNOne-point QC check frequency -- -- -- -- -- --Flow-rate verification frequency Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly -- --Monitor audit frequency -- Biannual Quarterly Quarterly Biannual BiannualPEP audit monitor? YNNNNNNPAP audit monitor?NNNNNNData submitted to AQS?YYYYYYData submitted to AirNOW?NYNYNNNAAQS - NCore continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 77MonitorCO NOx O3 Carbonyl Carbonyl VOC O3CBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleSite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Queen ValleyObjective Population Population Population Population Population Population TransportSpatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Urban Urban Urban Urban UrbanMonitor start date7/1/1993 7/1/1993 7/1/19935/15/1999 5/15/1999 1/1/20031/1/1998InstrumentEcotechEC 9830CO AnalyzerThermo 42CNOx AnalyzerTeledyne API400E O3AnalyzerATEC 8000CarbonylCartridgeSamplerATEC 8000CarbonylCartridgeSamplerATEC 8001CanisterSamplerTeledyne API400E O3AnalyzerInstrument Start Date 12/15/2011 7/1/19934/1/20116/5/2007 6/5/2007 6/2/20113/16/2011Instrument Location Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter ShelterAnalysis methodGas FilterCorrelationChemiluminescence UV Photometric TO-11A TO-11A TO-14 UV PhotometricMethod code 588 74087202 202 126087Sampling schedule Continuous Continuous Continuous 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 ContinuousSampling duration Hourly Hourly Hourly 24 hour 3 - 3 hour24 hourHourlySampling season All Year All Year All Year All year All year June – Aug.March – Oct.Probe height from ground 5 m 5 m 5 m 5 m 5 m 4.5 m 5 mProbe distance from structure -- -- -- -- -- -- --Probe materialBorosilicateGlass Funnel /FEP TeflonSample LineBorosilicateGlass Funnel /FEP TeflonSample LineBorosilicateGlass Funnel /FEP TeflonSample LineStainless SteelFunnel / FEPTeflon SampleLineStainless SteelFunnel / FEPTeflon SampleLineStainless SteelFunnel /Stainless SteelSample LineBorosilicateGlass Funnel /FEP TeflonSample LineResidence time 16.14 sec 15.69 sec 15.71 sec -- -- -- 3.46 secDistance from obstructions 8 m 8 m 8 m 8 m 8 m 8 m 73 mDistance from trees 5 m 5 m 5 m 5 m 5 m 5 m 3 mUnrestricted airflow degrees 210° 210° 210° 210° 210° 210° 360°In climate-controlled shelter?YYYYYYYOne-point QC check frequency Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Every 2 weeks Annual Annual Annual Every 2 weeksMonitor audit frequency Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual -- AnnualNPAP audit monitor? Y Y Y N N N YData submitted to AQS?YYYYYYYData submitted to AirNOW?YYYNNNYNAAQS - PAMSState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 78MonitorNOy VOC Delta TempTotal HorizontalSolar RadiationUltraviolet SolarRadiation Wind ProfilerCBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleSite Queen Valley Queen ValleyVehicleEmissionsLaboratoryVehicleEmissionsLaboratoryVehicleEmissionsLaboratoryVehicleEmissionsLaboratoryObjective Transport Transport Population Population Population PopulationSpatial scale Urban Urban Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor start date 1/1/1998 5/20/2001 8/20/2004 6/18/1999 8/20/2004 1/1/1998InstrumentThermo 42C TLReactive NOxMet One 8001CanisterSamplerRM Young RTD7627 DeltaTemp SystemLi-Cor LI-200S2PyranometerEpply TUVRUltravioletSensorVisaliaLAP-3000Wind ProfilerInstrument Start Date 5/9/2011 6/1/2010 8/20/2004 6/18/1999 8/20/2004 1/1/1998Instrument Location Shelter Shelter Tower Tower Tower GroundAnalysis methodChemiluminescence TO-14 None None None NoneMethod code 574 126 810 11 11 --Sampling schedule Continuous 1 in 6 Continuous Continuous Continuous ContinuousSampling duration Hourly24 hourHourly Hourly Hourly HourlySampling season June – Aug. June – Aug. All year All year All year All yearProbe height from ground 5 m 5 m 2 m & 9 m 5 m 5 m --Probe distance from structure -- -- 1 m 0.5 m 0.5 m --Probe materialBorosilicateGlass Funnel /FEP TeflonSample LineStainless SteelFunnel /Stainless SteelSample Line -- -- -- --Residence time -- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions 73 m 30 m 30 m 30 m 35 m 5 mDistance from trees 3 m 3 m 50 m 50 m 50 m 50 mUnrestricted airflow degrees 360° 360° 360° 360° 360° 360°In climate-controlled shelter?YYNNNNOne-point QC check frequency Every 2 weeks -- -- -- -- --Monitor audit frequency Annual Every 3 Years Annual -- -- --NPAP audit monitor? YNNNNNData submitted to AQS?YYNYYNData submitted to AirNOW?NNNNNNNAAQS - PAMS continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 79MonitorPM10PM2.5PM2.5CBSANogalesPrescottYumaSiteNogales PostOffice Prescott Valley Yuma SupersiteObjectivePopulation Population PopulationSpatial scaleNeighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor start date1/1/1980 12/28/2007 1/1/2010InstrumentMet One 1020BAMThermo Partisol2000 R&P Partisol 2000Instrument Start Date2/2/2004 12/28/2007 1/1/2010Instrument LocationRooftopRooftopPlatformAnalysis methodBeta RayAttenuationGravimetric GravimetricMethod code122143143Sampling scheduleContinuous 1 in 61 in 6Sampling durationHourly24 hour24 hourSampling seasonAll yearAll YearAll yearProbe height from ground7 m7 m5 mProbe distance from structure------Distance from obstructions8 m20 m50 mDistance from trees12 m----Unrestricted airflow degrees300°360°360°In climate-controlled shelter?YNNFlow-rate verification frequencyMonthlyMonthlyMonthlyMonitor audit frequencyBiannual Biannual BiannualPEP audit monitor?-- Y YData submitted to AQS? Y Y YData submitted to AirNOW? Y N NNAAQS - SPMState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 80MonitorPM2.5 Speciated PM2.5 SpeciationCBSAPhoenix-Mesa- Phoenix-MesaSite JLG Supersite JLG SupersiteObjective Population PopulationSpatial scale Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor start date 2/21/20002/21/2000InstrumentMet One SuperSASS URG 3000NInstrument Start Date 2/21/2000 10/1/2009Instrument Location Metal RoofMetal RoofAnalysis methodEnergy DispersiveXRF & IonChromatographyIMPROVE A TOR& VariousMethod code 811 & 812831, 838, &VariousSampling schedule 1 in 3 1 in 3Sampling duration 24 hour24 hourSampling seasonAll yearAll yearProbe height from ground5 m5 mProbe distance from structure----Distance from obstructions8 m8 mDistance from trees5 m5 mUnrestricted airflow degrees210°210°In climate-controlled shelter?N NFlow-rate verification frequencyMonthlyMonthlyMonitor audit frequencyQuarterlyQuarterlyData submitted to AQS?YYData submitted to AirNOW?NNSTNState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 81MonitorVOC VOC Carbonyl CarbonylHexavalentChromium SVOCPM10 MetalSpeciationCBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleSiteJLG Supersite JLG SupersiteJLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG SupersiteObjectivePopulation PopulationPopulation PopulationPopulation Population PopulationSpatial scaleUrban UrbanUrban UrbanUrban Urban NeighborhoodMonitor start date6/6/2001 6/6/2001 5/15/1999 5/15/1999 1/1/2006 7/8/2007 1/1/2005InstrumentATEC 2200 VOCCanister SamplerATEC 2200 VOCCanister SamplerATEC 8000Carbonyl CartridgeSamplerATEC 8000Carbonyl CartridgeSamplerXontec 924 ToxicAir SamplerTisch TE-1000BLPUF R&P Partisol 2000Instrument Start Date5/24/2007 5/24/20076/5/2007 6/5/20071/1/2006 7/8/2007 1/1/2005Instrument LocationShelter ShelterShelter ShelterMetal Roof Shelter Metal RoofAnalysis methodTO-15 TO-15TO-11A TO-11ACARB Method TO-13ICP-MS with HeatedHot Block in Dilute Acidand Hydrogen PeroxideFilter ExtractionMethod code101 101202 202920 118 202Sampling schedule1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6 1 in 6Sampling duration24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hourSampling seasonAll year All yearAll year All yearAll year All year All yearProbe height from ground5 m 5 m5 m 5 m5 m 4.5 m 5 mProbe distance from structure-- ---- ---- -- --Probe materialStainless SteelFunnel / StainlessSteel Sample LineStainless SteelFunnel / StainlessSteel Sample LineStainless SteelFunnel / FEPTeflon SampleLineStainless SteelFunnel / FEPTeflon SampleLine--Stainless SteelFunnel / StainlessSteel Sample Line--Residence time-- -- -- -- -- -- --Distance from obstructions8 m 8 m8 m 8 m8 m 8 m 8 mDistance from trees5 m 5 m5 m 5 m5 m 5 m 5 mUnrestricted airflow degrees210° 210°210° 210°210° 210° 210°In climate-controlled shelter? Y YY YNNNOne-point QC check frequencyAnnual AnnualAnnual Annual-- Monthly --Flow-rate verification frequency-- ---- ---- -- MonthlyMonitor audit frequencyAnnual AnnualAnnual AnnualBiannual Biannual BiannualData submitted to AQS?YYYYYYYData submitted to AirNOW?NNNNNNNTOXICS - NATTSState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 82MonitorVOCCBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdaleSite South PhoenixObjectivePopulationSpatial scaleNeighborhoodMonitor start date8/5/2001InstrumentATEC 8001Canister SamplerInstrument Start Date5/20/2010Instrument LocationShelterAnalysis methodTO-15Method code101Sampling schedule1 in 12Sampling duration24 hourSampling seasonAll yearProbe height from ground6 mProbe distance from structure2 mProbe materialStainless SteelFunnel / StainlessSteel Sample LineResidence time--Distance from obstructions12 mDistance from trees10 mUnrestricted airflow degrees250°In climate-controlled shelter? YOne-point QC check frequency--Monitor audit frequencyAnnualData submitted to AQS? YData submitted to AirNOW? NTOXICS - UATMPState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 83CBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleSiteADEQ BuildingBanner MesaMedical CenterEstrella MountainCommunityCollegeEstrella MountainCommunityCollegeNorth MountainSummitObjectiveVisibility Visibility Visibility Visibility VisibilitySpatial scaleUrban Urban Urban Urban UrbanMonitor start date7/1/2002 1/1/1993 1/1/1993 1/1/1993 1/1/1993InstrumentOlympusSP500UZ CameraOlympusSP500UZ CameraOlympusSP500UZ CameraOlympusSP500UZ CameraOlympusSP500UZ CameraInstrument Start Date7/1/2003 7/1/2003 7/1/2003 7/1/2003 7/1/2003Instrument LocationRooftop Rooftop Rooftop Rooftop TowerAnalysis methodNone None None None NoneMethod code-- -- -- -- --Sampling scheduleEvery 5 min. Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Every 5 min.Sampling duration< 1 sec < 1 sec < 1 sec < 1 sec < 1 secSampling seasonAll year All year All year All year All yearIn climate-controlled shelter?NNNNNData submitted to AQS?NNNNNData submitted to AirNOW?NNNNNVisibility - Urban Haze - CameraState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 84CBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleSite Dysart EstrellaVehicle EmissionsLaboratoryObjective Population Population PopulationSpatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood NeighborhoodMonitor start date 1/1/2003 1/1/2003 6/25/2003InstrumentOptec NGN 2NephelometerOptec NGN 2NephelometerOptec NGN 2NephelometerInstrument Start Date 1/1/2003 1/1/2003 6/25/2003Instrument Location Tower Tower TowerAnalysis methodLight Scatter withcorrelation toPM2.5Light Scatter withcorrelation toPM2.5Light Scatter withcorrelation toPM2.5Method code -- -- --Sampling schedule Continuous Continuous ContinuousSampling duration HourlyHourlyHourlySampling seasonAll yearAll yearAll yearProbe height from ground6 m6 m5 mProbe distance from structure------Distance from obstructions----30 mDistance from trees--5 m50 mUnrestricted airflow degrees360°360°360°In climate-controlled shelter?NNNMonitor audit frequencyAnnualAnnualAnnualData submitted to AQS?NNNData submitted to AirNOW?YYYVisibility - Urban Haze - NephelometerState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 85CBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleSitePhoenixTransmissometerReceiverPhoenixTransmissometerTransmitterObjectiveUrban Haze Urban HazeSpatial scaleUrban UrbanMonitor start date12/1/1992 12/1/1992InstrumentOptec LVP-2TransmissometerReceiverOptec LVP-2TransmissometerInstrument Start Date12/1/1992 12/1/1992Instrument LocationRooftop RooftopAnalysis methodLight Attenuation Light AttenuationMethod code----Sampling scheduleContinuous ContinuousSampling duration5 seconds 5 secondsSampling seasonAll yearAll yearDistance from obstructions----Distance from trees----Unrestricted airflow degrees290°360°In climate-controlled shelter?NNData submitted to AQS?NNData submitted to AirNOW?NNVisibility - Urban Haze - TransmissometerState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 86CBSAPhoenix-MesaScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleSite Dysart EstrellaPhoenixTransmissometerReceiverVehicle EmissionsLaboratoryObjectivePopulation Population Urban Haze PopulationSpatial scaleNeighborhood Neighborhood Urban NeighborhoodMonitor start date7/16/2003 2/11/2003 1/1/1994 5/11/1999InstrumentRotronics MP101AProbeRotronics MP101AProbeRotronics MP101AProbeRotronics MP101AProbeInstrument Start Date7/16/2003 2/11/2003 6/9/2003 6/30/2003Instrument LocationTower Tower Rooftop TowerAnalysis methodNoneNoneNoneNoneMethod code-- -- -- --Sampling scheduleContinuous Continuous Continuous ContinuousSampling durationHourly Hourly Hourly HourlySampling seasonAll year All year All year All yearProbe height from ground6 m 6 m 36 m 5 mProbe distance from structure1 m 1 m 1 m 1 mDistance from obstructions-- -- 5 m 30 mDistance from trees-- 5 m -- 50 mUnrestricted airflow degrees360° 360° 360° 360°In climate-controlled shelter?NNNNMonitor audit frequencyAnnualAnnualAnnualAnnualData submitted to AQS?NNNNData submitted to AirNOW?NNNNVisibility - Urban Haze - Temp/RHState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 87CBSASierra VistaDouglasSierra Vista-DouglasFlagstaff Flagstaff None FlagstaffPhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdalePhoenix-Mesa-ScottsdaleLake HavasuCity-KingmanSiteChiricahuaEntranceStationDouglas RedCrossGrand CanyonNational Park -Hance CampGrand CanyonNational Park -IndianGardensGreer WaterTreatmentPlant Ike's Backbone JLG Supersite JLG Supersite MeadviewObjectiveVisibility Visibility Visibility Visibility Visibility Visibility Population Population BackgroundSpatial scaleRegional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Neighborhood Neighborhood RegionalMonitor start date3/2/1988 6/2/2004 9/24/1997 10/1/1989 2/29/2000 4/2/2000 4/25/2001 4/25/2001 9/4/1991InstrumentIMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVEIMPROVEIMPROVEInstrument Start Date4/2/2000 6/2/2004 9/24/1997 10/1/1989 2/29/2000 4/2/2000 4/25/2001 4/25/2001 9/4/1991Instrument LocationShelter Platform Shelter Shelter Shelter Shelter Metal Roof Metal Roof ShelterAnalysis methodVarious Various Various Various Various Various Various Various VariousMethod code------------------Sampling schedule1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3Sampling duration24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hourSampling seasonAll Year All Year All year All year All year All year All year All year All yearProbe height from ground4 m 3 m * 4 m 4 m 4 m 5.5 m 5.5 m *Probe distance from structure1 m -- * 2 m 1 m 1 m -- -- *Distance from obstructions10 m 8 m * -- 150 m 7 m 8 m 8 m *Distance from trees10 m 6 m * 6 m 50 m 18 m 5 m 5 m *Unrestricted airflow degrees360° 320° * 300° 360° 360° 210° 210° *Distance between collocatedmonitors-- -- -- -- -- -- 2 m 2 m --In climate-controlled shelter?NNNNNNNNNFlow-rate verification frequency-- -- -- -- -- -- Annual Annual --Monitor audit frequencyN Annual -- -- Annual Annual Annual Annual --Data submitted to AQS?YYYYYYYYYData submitted to AirNOW?NNNNNNNNNProtocol site? N YNNNNYYY* Information not availableIMPROVEState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 88CBSATucson None PaysonPhoenix-MesaScottsdaleTucson Tucson Flagstaff PaysonSiteOrgan PipeNationalMonumentPetrified ForestNational ParkPleasantValley RangerStation Queen ValleySaguaroNational ParkEastSaguaroNational ParkWestSycamoreCanyonTonto NationalMonumentObjectiveBackground Visibility Visibility Visibility Visibility Visibility Visibility VisibilitySpatial scaleRegional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional RegionalMonitor start date1/15/2003 3/2/1988 2/10/2000 4/30/2001 6/4/1988 4/19/2001 9/11/1991 4/23/1988InstrumentIMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVEInstrument Start Date1/15/2003 3/2/1988 2/10/2000 4/30/2001 6/4/1988 4/19/2001 9/11/1991 4/23/1988Instrument LocationShelter Shelter Shelter Rooftop Shelter Shelter Shelter ShelterAnalysis methodVarious Various Various Various Various Various Various VariousMethod code----------------Sampling schedule1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3 1 in 3Sampling duration24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hour 24 hourSampling seasonAll year All year All year All year All year All year All year All yearProbe height from ground3.6 m * 4 m 6 m * 4 m 4 m 5 mProbe distance from structure1.5 m * 1.5 m 1 m * 1 m 1 m 1.5 mDistance from obstructions7.6 m * -- 73 m * -- 25 m --Distance from trees12 m * 10 m 4 m * 15 m 15 m 6 mUnrestricted airflow degrees360° * 360° 360° * 360° 360° 360°Distance between collocatedmonitors-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --In climate-controlled shelter?NNNNNNNYFlow-rate verification frequency-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Monitor audit frequencyAnnual -- Annual Annual -- Annual Annual AnnualData submitted to AQS?YYYYYYYYData submitted to AirNOW?NNNNNNNNProtocol site? Y N N Y N Y N N* Information not availableIMPROVE - continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 89

### Appendix D – Site Information Data Tables
Note: Some measurements are rounded and/or estimations

This appendix contains detailed information about sites that are fully or partially operated by ADEQ, as well as sites that ADEQ has a str ong association with (e.g. IMPROVE sites). All current sites and those closed af ter July 1, 2011 are included in th is appendix. Sites that were closed after July 1, 2011 contain a note indicating so in the site summary section. This appendix also contains general information about the air qu ality monitors at each site. See Appendix C for more detailed information on sp ecific monitors and networks.

AQS ID ADEQ ID SITE NAME PAGE 21737 ADEQ Building 94 80-026-1000 16361 Agua Prieta Fire Station 95 04-019-0001 16316 Ajo 96 04-012-8000 34961 Alamo Lake 97 19489 Banner Mesa Medical Center 98 04-015-1003 16365 Bullhead City 99 04-003-8001 16679 Chiricahua Entrance Station 100 04-003-1005 16503 Douglas Red Cross 101 04-013-4010 19550 Dysart 102 04-013-8005 16506 Estrella 103 21736 Estrella Mountain Community College 104 04-005-1008 16707 Flagstaff Middle School 105 16593 Globe Highway 106 04-005-8102 16682 Grand Canyon National Park – Hance Camp 107 04-005-8101 16683 Grand Canyon National Park – Indian Garden 108 04-001-8001 16323 Greer Water Treatment Plant 109 04-007-1001 16326 Hayden Old Jail 110 04-025-8104 16421 Ike’s Backbone 111 04-013-9997 16328 JLG Supersite 112 04-015-9000 21298 Meadview 115 04-007-8000 16629 Miami Golf Course 116 04-007-0009 16382 Miami Ridgeline 117 04-023-0004 16511 Nogales Post Office 118 16480 North Mountain Summit 120 04-019-0005 16681 Organ Pipe National Monument 121 04-003-0011 16391 Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant 122 16392 Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant South 123 04-007-0008 16317 Payson Well Site 124 04-001-0012 16473 Petrified Forest National Park 125 16829 Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver 126 16330 Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter 127 16446 Pleasant Valley Ranger Station 128 04-025-8033 133011 Prescott College AQD 129 04-025-2002 18392 Prescott Valley 130

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 90AQS ID ADEQ ID SITE NAME PAGE 04-021-8001 16394 Queen Valley 131 04-019-0020 16499 Rillito 133 04-019-0021 16474 Saguaro National Park East 134 04-019-9000 16475 Saguaro National Park West 135 80-026-8012 113221 San Luis Rio Colorado 136 142818 Sedona Fire Station AQD 137 04-005-1010 16512 Sedona Post Office 138 04-017-0007 16603 Show Low 139 80-026-0005 16399 Sonora Nogales Fire Station 140 04-013-4003 16377 South Phoenix 141 135133 Springerville 142 04-005-8103 16476 Sycamore Canyon 143 04-007-0010 16447 Tonto National Monument 144 04-013-9998 16363 Vehicle Emissions Laboratory 145 138696 Verde Ranger Station 147 04-027-8011 11319 Yuma Supersite 148

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 91Definitions for Appendix D – Si te In formation Data Tables

Site Name Official name for the site as wr itten in ADEQ’s AZURITE / AAAD database Site propose Reason for air quality monitoring at the site Site narrative Brief summary of the site location and surroundings

Site Information AQS ID Unique identifier from EPA’s Air Quality System database ADEQ ID Unique identifier from the AZ URITE / AAAD database for each monitoring site Address Physical address or cross st reets of the monitoring site County Arizona county the monitor is located within CBSA Core Based Statistical Area that the site is located within. A CBSA is a U.S. geographic area defined by th e Office of Management and Budget based around an urban center of at least 10,000 people and adjacent areas that are socioeconomically tied to the urban center by commuting. Surrounding area Description of area around monitori ng site (residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, desert, forest, mobile, blighted area, and military reservation) Distance to road Distance and direction from the edge of the road to the instrument Traffic count ADOT supplied traffic count for th e nearest major road (data obtained in 2010) Groundcover Type of surface at the base of the instrument (e.g. sand, cement, rooftop, metal, asphalt, etc.) Latitude The North/South geographic location of a site in decimal degrees Longitude The East/West geographic location of a site in decimal degrees Elevation The vertical distance above sea l evel of the site in meters Site Established Date Date site was first used as a monitoring site

Monitoring Information Monitor The pollutant(s) or the atmospheric parameter(s) being monitored at the site Network The set of monitors collecting air samples or taking measurements to which this monitor is associated within ADEQs various networks (e.g. SLAMS, NCORE, CSN, PAMS, SP M, NATTS, IMPROVE, or Urban Haze) Objective A brief description of the inte nded purpose of the monitor’s measurements (maximum concentration, population exposure, sourceoriented, background, transport, visibility or welfare based) Spatial scale Area represented by an air quality monitor (microscale: 0 – 100 m, middle scale: 0.1 – 0.5 km, neighborhood: 0.5 – 4 km, urban: 4 – 50 km, regional: ~50 – 500 km, or national/global) Monitor start date Date that a pollutant, parameter, or measurement was started at the site

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 92State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 93 Instrument Specific make and model of physical devi se that is used to collect air samples or take measurements Instrument Start Date The date that the current type of instrument (i.e. method) began operation at the site

Site Photos Aerial View Image of site and the surrounding area (using Google Earth) Site View Most current photo of monitors at the siteADEQ Building Site Purpose : monitor urban haze.

The high-resolution digital camera sits on the northeast corner of th e building and points toward Camelback Mountain, which lies 13.4 kilome ters to the northeast. The pictures of the local view are updated every 5 minutes a nd can be viewed on the internet at http://www.phoenixvis.net/came1/index.html . The area between the site and Camelback Mountain is primarily residentia l with some commercial areas.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 21737 Address 1110 W. Washington St. Phoenix, AZ 85007

County Maricopa Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.4483 Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -112.0878

Distance to road 84 m – S Elevation 329 m Traffic count 10,852 – Washington St. Site Established Date 07/01/2002

Monitoring Information Monitor Visibility Network Urban Haze Objective Visibility Spatial Scale Urban Monitor Start Date 07/01/2002

Instrument Olympus SP500UZ

Camera Instrument Start Date 07/01/2003

Site Photos

Aerial view of ADEQ Building Camera on rooftop of ADEQ Building – 4/2010

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 94Agua Prieta Fire Station Site Purpose : special purpose monitoring.

The site is located approximately 640 meters south of the Arizona/Mexico border. The surrounding area is primarily residen tial. This site is used as a comparison to the Douglas Red Cross site as part of the border studies. In the summer of 2011, this site was closed due to funding constraints.

Site Information AQS ID 80-026-1000 ADEQ ID 16361 Address Calle 6 & Ave. 15 Agua Prieta, Sonora, Mexico

County Sonora Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA None Latitude 31.3283 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -109.5472

Distance to road 6 m – W Elevation 1,200 m Traffic count n/a Site Established Date 01/01/1995

Monitoring Information Monitor PM 10 PM 2.5 Wind Temp/RH

Network Non-regulatory SPM Non-regulatory SPM Non-regulatory SPM Non-regulatory SPM Objective Population Population Population Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Nei ghborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 01/01/1995 04/11/2010 12/18/1998 12/18/1998

Instrument Partisol 2000 Partisol 2000 RM Young 5103 Vaisala HMP 45C Instrument Start Date 04/11/2010 04/11/2010 12/18/1998 12/18/1998

Site Photos

Aerial view of Agua Prieta Fire Station Roof of Aqua Prieta Fire Station – 12/2004

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 95Ajo Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network.

The site is located at the Pima County Mainte nance Yard, with the wind system mounted to the north of the instruments. The closest struct ure to the site is an east-west oriented ADOT office/trailer to the south. To the east lies the st abilized tailings pile a ssociated with the Ajo mining operation which closed in 1985.

Site Information AQS ID 04-019-0001 ADEQ ID 16316 Address 1211 Well Rd. Ajo, AZ 85321

County Pima Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Tucson Latitude 32.3820 Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -112.8575

Distance to road 109 m – E Elevation 515 m Traffic count 500 – Ajo Well Rd. 1 Site Established Date 07/01/1969

Monitoring Information Monitor PM 10 Wind Network SLAMS MET Objective Population Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 02/11/1991 07/01/1969

Instrument R&P 1400AB TEOM RM Young 5103 Anemometer Instrument Start Date 02/19/2009 06/11/2003

Site Photos

Aerial view of Ajo Ajo fenced area and meteorological tower – 03/2009

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 96Alamo Lake Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network and AQI forecasting.

The site was established to replace the Hillside si te and is located in Alamo Lake State Park, which is approximately 49 km north of Wende n, AZ. The surrounding area consists of mostly desert, with a lake about 1 km to the northeast. A small water pump/storage tank (1,000 gallon) lies 7 meters to the east of the shelter.

Site Information AQS ID 04-012-8000 ADEQ ID 34961 Address Alamo Lake State Park

County La Paz Groundcover Gravel

CBSA None Latitude 34.2439 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -113.5586

Distance to road 30 m – E Elevation 403 m Traffic count 230 – Alamo Rd. Site Established Date 05/20/2005

Monitoring Information Monitor O 3 Network SLAMS Objective Transport Spatial Scale Regional Monitor Start Date 05/20/2005

Instrument Teledyne API 400E O3 Analyzer Instrument Start Date 03/10/2011

Site Photos

Regional view of Alamo Lake Alamo Lake shelter with water tanks to the east – 09/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 97Banner Mesa Medical Center Site Purpose : monitor urban haze.

The high-resolution digital camera points to the Superstition Mountains, which lie 32 km east of the site. The pictures of the local views are updated every 5 minutes and can be viewed on the internet at http://www.phoenixvis.net/supm1/index.html . The area between the site and the mountains is primarily residentia l, with some commercial areas.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 19489 Address 525 W. Brown Rd. Mesa, AZ 85201

County Maricopa Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.4335 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -111.8428

Distance to road 20 m – N Elevation 454 m Traffic count 32,760 – Country Club Dr. Site Established Date 01/01/1993

Monitoring Information Monitor Visibility Network Urban Haze Objective Visibility Spatial Scale Urban Monitor Start Date 01/01/1993

Instrument Olympus SP500UZ

Camera Instrument Start Date 07/01/2003

Site Photos

Aerial view of Banner Mesa Medical Center No Photo

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 98Bullhead City Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network.

The site is located on the rooftop of the U.S. Post Office Building, northeast of SR 95 and 7 th Street. The surrounding area is commercial and residential to the west and south. The Colorado River lies to the west less than 400 meters. To the northeast/east, about 575 meters, is the Bullhead City Airport.

Site Information AQS ID 04-015-1003 ADEQ ID 16365 Address 990 Highway 95 Bullhead City, AZ 86429

County Mohave Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Lake Havasu City-Kingman Latitude 35.1539 Surrounding Area Commercial/Residential Longitude -114.5661

Distance to road ~30 m – W Elevation 156 m Traffic count 32,575 – SR 95 Site Established Date 11/01/1997

Monitoring Information Monitor PM 10 Network SLAMS Objective Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 11/05/1997

Instrument R&P Partisol 2000 Instrument Start Date 09/02/2003

Site Photos

Aerial view of Bullhead City Roof of Bullhead City Post Office looking north – 04/2012

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 99Chiricahua Entrance Station Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is operated by the NPS. The su rrounding area is wilder ness and desert. The Chiricahua National Monument lies 3.8 km to the northeast.

Site Information AQS ID 04-003-8001 ADEQ ID 16679 Address 13063 E. Bonita Canyon Rd. Wilcox, AZ 85643

County Cochise Groundcover Dirt/Rocks

CBSA Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude 32.0094 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -109.3891

Distance to road 99 m – E Elevation 1,570 m Traffic count 216 – Bonita Canyon Rd. Site Established Date 01/01/1988

Monitoring Information Monitor Aerosol Network IMPROVE Objective Visibility Spatial Scale Regional Monitor Start Date 03/02/1988 Instrument IMPROVE Instrument Start Date 04/02/2000

Site Photos

Regional view of Chiricahua Entrance Station Chiricahua Entrance Station shelter and IMPROVE – 07/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 100Douglas Red Cross Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network.

The site is located at the Red Cr oss building on the south side of 15 th Street. The surrounding area is a mix of residential and commercial land use. The site is about 1,685 meters from the Arizona/Mexico border. Due to an oversight when loading IMPROVE data to the AQS database, a second AQS ID was created (04- 003-9000) for IMPROVE data. This is an IMPROVE protocol site.

Site Information AQS ID 04-003-1005 ADEQ ID 16503 Address 1445 E. 15 th St. Douglas, AZ 85607

County Cochise Groundcover Dirt/Grass

CBSA Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude 31.3492 Surrounding Area Commercial/R esidential Longitude -109.5396

Distance to road 30 m – N Elevation 1,231 m Traffic count 2,320 – 14 th St. Site Established Date 09/01/1998

Monitoring Information Monitor PM 10 PM 2.5 Aerosol Network SLAMS SLAMS IMPROVE Objective Population Population Visibility Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Regional Monitor Start Date 09/02/1998 11/02/2000 06/02/2004

Instrument R&P Partisol 2000 R&P Partisol 2000 IMPROVE

Instrument Start Date 04/01/2004 04/01/2004 06/02/2004

Site Photos

Aerial view of Douglas Red Cross Douglas Red Cross fenced site – 01/2012

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 101Dysart Site Purpose : monitor urban haze and AQI forecasting.
The site is located in the Maricopa County F acility Maintenance Yard at the corner of Bell Road and Dysart Road and is shared with MCAQD. The surrounding area is commercial and residential.

Site Information AQS ID 04-013-4010 ADEQ ID 19550 Address 16825 N. Dysart Rd. Surprise, AZ 85374

County Maricopa Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.6370 Surrounding Area Commercial/R esidential Longitude -112.3393

Distance to road 14 m – W Elevation 357 m Traffic count 51,673 – Bell Rd. Site Established Date 01/01/2003

Monitoring Information Monitor Bscat/PM 2.5 Temp/RH Network Urban Haze Urban Haze Objective Population Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 01/01/2003 07/16/2003

Instrument Optec NGN 2 Nephelometer Rotronics MP101A Probe Instrument Start Date 01/01/2003 07/16/2003

Site Photos

Aerial view of Dysart Dysart ADEQ Nephelometer tower attached to county shelter – 02/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 102Estrella Site Purpose : monitor urban haze and AQI forecasting.

The site is located in the southeast corner of the Maricopa County Maintenance Yard at Estrella Park. The surrounding area consist of the Estr ella Mountains to the east, south, and west; a golf course 256 meters to the west; and a mixture of open land, agricultural lands, residential, and commercial activity to the north.

Site Information AQS ID 04-013-8005 ADEQ ID 16506 Address 15099 W. Casey Abbott Rd. Goodyear, AZ 85338

County Maricopa Groundcover Grass/Gravel

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.3833 Surrounding Area Desert/Recreation Area Longitude -112.3728

Distance to road 258 m – N Elevation 277 m Traffic count 910 – W. Vineyard Ave. Site Established Date 01/01/1995

Monitoring Information Monitor Bscat/PM 2.5 Temp/RH Network Urban Haze Urban Haze Objective Population Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 01/01/2003 02/11/2003

Instrument Optec NGN 2 Nephelometer Rotronics MP101A Probe Instrument Start Date 01/01/2003 02/11/2003

Site Photos

Aerial view of Estrella Estrella Nephelometer tower – 02/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 103Estrella Mountain Community College Site Purpose : monitor urban haze.

One high-resolution digital camera points to th e Estrella Mountains, wh ich lies 11 km to the southwest, and the other camera points to the White Tanks mountain range which is 20 km to the northeast. The pictures of the local views are updated every 5 minutes and can be viewed on the internet at http://www.phoenixvis.net/esmo1/index.html . The area between the site and the mountain ranges is a mixture of residen tial, commercial, and agricultural uses.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 21736 Address 3000 N. Dysart Rd. Avondale, AZ 85323

County Maricopa Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.4836 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -112.3503

Distance to road 155 m – S Elevation 305 m Traffic count 7,280 – Thomas Rd. Site Established Date 01/01/1993

Monitoring Information Monitor Visibility Network Urban Haze Objective Visibility Spatial Scale Urban Monitor Start Date 01/01/1993

Instrument Olympus SP500UZ

Camera Instrument Start Date 07/01/2003

Site Photos

Aerial view of Estrella Mountain Community College No photo

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 104Flagstaff Middle School Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network and monitor smoke/public information.

The site is west of Bonito Road on the roof top of a Flagstaff Middle School building. The surrounding area is generally residential, with Thorpe Park located about 800 meters to the west, and US Route 180 approximately 415 meters to the east.

Site Information AQS ID 04-005-1008 ADEQ ID 16707 Address 755 N. Bonito St. Flagstaff, AZ 86001

County Coconino Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 35.2061 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -111.6528

Distance to road 70 m – E Elevation 2,120 m Traffic count 3,200 – N. Bonito St. Site Established Date 10/29/1996

Monitoring Information Monitor O 3 PM 10 PM 2.5 PM 2.5 Network SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS Non-regulatory SPM Objective Population Population Population Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Nei ghborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 03/13/2008 10/30/1996 08/27/2001 08/27/2001

Instrument Teledyne API 400E O3 Analyzer R&P Partisol 2000 R&P Partisol 2000 Met One E-BAM

Instrument Start Date 03/11/2011 04/01/2004 09/16/2003 07/14/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Flag staff Middle School Particulate monitors on roof of Flagstaff Middle School – 04/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 105Globe Highw ay Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network and a source permit requirement.

This site is the location of the collocated TSP Pb monitors in Hayden, AZ. ASARCO mine also maintains a sulfur dioxide analyzer at the site. The site is located on the southwest end of a small canyon and is located approximately 1 km to the east/south east of the ASARCO smelting facility. Due to its proximity to the e nd of the canyon, the site may be influenced by both broad and local mete orological conditions.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 16593 Address SR 77 Winkelman, AZ 85292

County Gila Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.002 Surrounding Area Desert/Residential Longitude -110.765

Distance to road 5 m – W Elevation 602 m Traffic count n/a Site Established Date 01/01/1975

Monitoring Information Monitor Pb Wind Temp/RH Network SLAMS MET MET Objective Source Population Population Spatial Scale Middle Middle Middle Monitor Start Date 10/01/2010 04/15/2011 04/15/2011

Instrument Tisch TE-8550- BL TSP RM Young 5103 Anemometer Vaisala HMP155 Probe

Instrument Start Date 10/01/2010 04/15/2011 04/15/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Globe Highway Shelter, towers, and TSP monitors at Globe Highway – 5/10/2011

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 106Grand Canyon National Park - Hance Camp Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is operated by the NPS. The site is 183 meters south of East Rim Drive and 1,931 meters south of Grandview Point turnoff. The site is in a clearing surrounded by forest.

Site Information AQS ID 04-005-8102 ADEQ ID 16682 Address West of SR 64 - Grand Canyon, AZ 86023

County Coconino Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 35.9731 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -111.9841

Distance to road 200 m – E Elevation 2,235 m Traffic count 6,579 – SR 64 Site Established Date 09/24/1997

Monitoring Information Monitor Aerosol Network IMPROVE Objective Visibility Spatial Scale Regional Monitor Start Date 09/24/1997 Instrument IMPROVE Instrument Start Date 09/24/1997

Site Photos

Regional view of Grand Canyon NP - Hance Camp Grand Canyon NP - Hance Camp shelter – date unknown

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 107Grand Canyon National Park - Indian Gardens Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is owned by the NPS. The site is loca ted in the Indian Gardens picnic area in the Grand Canyon, near the ranger station on the sout h side of the canyon along the Bright Angel Trail.

Site Information AQS ID 04-005-8101 ADEQ ID 16683 Address Bright Angel Trail Grand Canyon, AZ 86023

County Coconino Groundcover Dirt/Rocks

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 36.0778 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -112.1289

Distance to road 8,047 m – S Elevation 1,183 m Traffic count 1,250 – Entrance Road Site Established Date 10/01/1989

Monitoring Information Monitor Aerosol Network IMPROVE Objective Visibility Spatial Scale Regional Monitor Start Date 10/01/1989 Instrument IMPROVE Instrument Start Date 10/01/1989

Site Photos

Regional view of Grand Canyon NP - Indian Gardens Grand Canyon NP - Indian Gardens IMPROVE monitor – 04/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 108Greer Water Treatmen t Plant Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is located in the Apache National Fo rest and is operated the USFS. The surrounding area is forest with the town of Greer appr oximately 4 km to the south/southwest.

Site Information AQS ID 04-001-8001 ADEQ ID 16323 Address SR 260 & SR 373 Greer, AZ 85927

County Apache Groundcover Grass

CBSA None Latitude 34.0583 Surrounding Area Forest Longitude -109.4400

Distance to road 1,600 m – N Elevation 2,503 m Traffic count 1,044 – SR 373 Site Established Date 01/01/2000

Monitoring Information Monitor Aerosol Network IMPROVE Objective Visibility Spatial Scale Regional Monitor Start Date 02/29/2000 Instrument IMPROVE Instrument Start Date 02/29/2000

Site Photos

Aerial view of Greer Water Treatment Plant Shelter at Greer Water Treatment Plant – 09/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 109Hayden Old Jail Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network and a source permit requirement.

The site is located in a shelter next to the ol d Hayden Jail building near the center of town. The instruments were previously located in the ja il building and were moved due to safety and siting concerns in 2010. The surroun ding area consists mainly of residential and commercial. The site is located approximately 1 km to the west of the ASARCO smelting facility. ASARCO mine also maintains a sulfur dioxide an alyzer at the site in the old ja il building.

Site Information AQS ID 04-007-1001 ADEQ ID 16326 Address Canyon Dr. & Kennecott Ave. Hayden, AZ 85235

County Gila Groundcover Shelter

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.0062 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -110.7864

Distance to road 5 m – E Elevation 625 m Traffic count 1,790 – Velasco Ave. Site Established Date 01/01/1969

Monitoring Information Monitor SO 2 PM 10 Wind Temp/RH Network SLAMS SLAMS MET MET Objective Source Source Population Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Nei ghborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 01/01/1975 01/06/1981 02/02/2011 02/02/2011

Instrument Thermo 43C SO2 Analyzer R&P 1400 AB TEOM RM Young 5103 Anemometer Vaisala HMP45C Probe

Instrument Start Date 10/10/2001 03/03/2009 02/02/2011 02/02/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Hayden Old Jail Hayden Old Jail – 05/2011

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 110Ike’s Backbone Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is operated by the USFS. The surr ounding area is Tonto National Forest, which includes Mazatzal and Pine Mount ain Wilderness areas. The site is located on a small ridge with the Verde River and mountains nearby.

Site Information AQS ID 04-025-8104 ADEQ ID 16421 Address Fossil Creek Rd. and Childs Rd. Strawberry, AZ 85544

County Coconino Groundcover Rocks/Plants

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 34.3406 Surrounding Area Forest Longitude -111.6825

Distance to road n/a Elevation 1,303 m Traffic count 475 – Fossil Creek Rd. Site Established Date 04/02/2000

Monitoring Information Monitor Aerosol Network IMPROVE Objective Visibility Spatial Scale Regional Monitor Start Date 04/02/2000 Instrument IMPROVE Instrument Start Date 04/02/2000

Site Photos

Regional view of Ike’s Backbone IMPROVE at Ike’s Backbone – 2011

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 111State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 112 JLG Supersite Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network, NCore, PAMS, NATTS, STN, AQI forecasting, monitor urban haze, and meteorological support.

The site was established to represent air quality in the central core of the Phoenix metropolitan area. The surrounding area is primarily resident ial neighborhoods, with I-17 approximately 1.6 km to the west. This is also an IMPROVE protocol site.

Site Information AQS ID 04-013-9997 ADEQ ID 16328 Address 4530 N. 17 th Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85015

County Maricopa Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.5038 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -112.0957

Distance to road 8.5 m – E Elevation 354 m Traffic count 20,214 – Campbell Ave. Site Established Date 07/01/1993

Monitoring Information Monitor CO NOy NO 2 /NOx O 3 Network SLAMS/ NCore/PAMS NCore SLAMS/PAMS SLAMS/ NCore/PAMS Objective Population Population Population Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Ne ighborhood Neighborhood/ Urban Monitor Start Date 07/01/1993 01/01/2011 07/01/1993 07/01/1993

Instrument Ecotech EC 9830 CO Analyzer Ecotech 9843 Reactive NOx Thermo 42C NOx Analyzer Teledyne API 400E O3 Analyzer Instrument Start Date 12/15/2011 04/01/2011 07/01/1993 04/01/2011

Monitoring Information Monitor SO 2 VOC VOC Carbonyls

Network SLAMS/NCore PAMS/ TOXICS -

NATTS TOXICS - NATTS PAMS/ TOXICS -

NATTS Objective Population Population Population Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Urban Urban Urban Monitor Start Date 03/03/2005 01/01/2003 6/6/2001 05/15/1999

Instrument Ecotech EC-9850 SO2 Analyzer ATEC 8001 Canister Sampler ATEC 2200 VOC Canister Sampler ATEC 8000 Carbonyl Cartridge Sampler Instrument Start Date 06/01/2010 06/02/2011 5/24/2007 06/05/2007State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 113 Monitoring Information

Monitor Hexavalent Chromium SVOC Pb PM 10 PM 10-2.5

Network TOXIC - NATTS TOXICS - NATTS SLAMS/NCore NCore Objective Population Population Population Population Spatial Scale Urban Urban Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 01/01/2006 07/08/2007 01/01/2005 11/10/2010

Instrument Xontec 924 Toxic Air Sampler Tisch TE1000BL PUF R&P Partisol 2000 Paired Met One 1020 BAMs

Instrument Start Date 01/01/2006 07/08/2007 01/01/2005 11/10/2010

Monitoring Information

Monitor PM 10 PM 10 /Metal Speciation PM 2.5 PM 2.5

Network SLAMS TOXICS – NATTS SLAMS/NCore SLAMS/NCore Objective Population Population Population Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Nei ghborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 07/01/1993 01/01/2005 07/01/2003 07/01/2003

Instrument Met One 1020 BAM R&P Partisol 2000 R&P Partisol 2000 Met One 1020 BAM Instrument Start Date 11/10/2010 01/01/2005 07/01/2011 11/10/2010

Monitoring Information

Monitor PM 2.5 Speciated PM 2.5 Speciated Wind Temp/RH

Network NCore/STN NCore/STN Met/NCore Met/NCore Objective Population Population Population Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood N N N ei ghborhood eighborhood eighborhood Monitor Start Date 02/21/2000 02/21/2000 07/01/1993 07/01/1993

Instrument Met One Super URG 3000N RM Young

A MP101A Probe SASS 5103
nemometer Rotronics

Instrument Start Date 02/21/2000 10/01/2009 07/01/1993 01/15/2010

onitoring In rmation M fo Monitor Aerosol Network IMPROVE Objective Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Monitor Sta rt Date 04/25/2001 Instrument IMPROVE Instrument Start Date 04/25/2001State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 114 Site Photos

Aerial view of JLG Supersite Eastern side of JLG Supersite – 09/2008Meadview Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is located within the Lake Mead National Recreation Area on the north end of Meadview, AZ, where the Grand Canyon meets Lake Mead. The surrounding area is primarily desert. To the southwest 64.4 km is US 93, which is the closest highway to the site and about 96.5 km to the southeast is downtown Kingma n. This is an IMPROVE protocol site.

Site Information AQS ID 04-015-9000 ADEQ ID 21298 Address Pierce Ferry Rd. Meadview, AZ 86444

County Mohave Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Lake Havasu City-Kingman Latitude 36.0193 Surrounding Area Desert/Residential Longitude -114.0684

Distance to road 100 m – E Elevation 902 m Traffic count 0 – Pierce Ferry Rd. Site Established Date 09/04/1991

Monitoring Information Monitor Aerosol Network IMPROVE Objective Background Spatial Scale Regional Monitor Start Date 09/04/1991 Instrument IMPROVE Instrument Start Date 09/04/1991

Site Photos

Regional view of Meadview Photo of Meadview taken from IMPROVE website – date unknown

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 115Miami Golf Course Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network and a source permit requirement.

This site is the location of the TSP-Pb m onitor in Miami, AZ. Freeport McMoRan also maintains two particulate matter monitors at the site. The site is located near the Cobre Valley Country Club with residential areas to the s outh and east and the Free port McMoRan facility approximately 2 km to the west/southwest.

Site Information AQS ID 04-007-8000 ADEQ ID 16629 Address SR 188 and US 60 Miami, AZ 85539

County Gila Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.4190 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -110.8296

Distance to road 230 – E Elevation 1000 m Traffic count n/a Site Established Date 01/01/1997

Monitoring Information Monitor Pb Wind Temp/RH Network SLAMS MET MET Objective Source Population Population Spatial Scale Middle Middle Middle Monitor Start Date 10/01/2010 06/08/2011 06/08/2011

Instrument Tisch TE-8550- BL TSP RM Young 5305 Anemometer Vaisala HMP 155 Probe

Instrument Start Date 10/01/2010 06/08/2011 06/08/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Miami Golf Course Fenced Miami Golf Course site – 05/2011

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 116Miami Ridgeline Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network and a source permit requirement.

The site is located inside the fence line on pr ivate property off of Linden Road and sits on the side of a north-south oriented ri dge, which slopes in a northerly direction toward the town of Miami. The surrounding area is desert. Free port McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc. also maintains a PM 10 monitor at the site. The Freeport McMo Ran smelter is 1.6 km to the north of the site.

Site Information AQS ID 04-007-0009 ADEQ ID 16382 Address 4030 Linden St. Miami, AZ 85539

County Gila Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.3992 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -110.8589

Distance to road 40 m – N Elevation 1,085 m Traffic count 510 – Loomis Ave. Site Established Date 0/01/1993

Monitoring Information Monitor SO 2 Network SLAMS Objective Source Spatial Scale Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 10/05/1995

Instrument Thermo 43C SO2 Analyzer Instrument Start Date 7/21/1999

Site Photos

Aerial view of Miami Ridgeline Fenced Miami Ridgeline site – 04/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 117State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 118 Nogales Post Office Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network.

The site is located on the rooftop of the U.S. Post Office building, which lies approximately 670 meters north from the Arizona/Mexico Bo rder. The surrounding area is a mixture of commercial and residential land use. Th is site is used to meet the PM 2.5 collocation requirement.

Site Information AQS ID 04-023-0004 ADEQ ID 16511 Address 300 N. Morley Ave. Nogales, AZ 85621

County Santa Cruz Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Nogales Latitude 31.3372 Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -110.9367

Distance to road 14 m – NW Elevation 1,176 m Traffic count 7,199 – Morley Ave. Site Established Date 01/01/1980

Monitoring Information Monitor PM 10 PM 10 PM 2.5 PM 2.5 Network SLAMS NAAQS-SPM SLAMS Non-regulatory SPM Objective Population Population Population Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Nei ghborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 01/01/1980 01/01/1980 04/01/1999 04/01/1999

Instrument Thermo Partisol 2000 Met One 1020 BAM R&P Partisol 2000 Met One 1020 BAM Instrument Start Date 08/27/2003 02/02/2004 09/26/2003 02/02/2004

Monitoring Information Monitor Wind Temp/RH Network MET MET Objective Population Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 01/01/1980 08/11/2011

Instrument RM Young 5103 Anemometer Vaisala HMP45C Probe

Instrument Start Date 06/13/2003 08/11/2011Site Photos

Aerial view of Nogales Post Office Particulate and meteor ological monitors on roof of Nogales Post Office – 02/2012

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 119North Mountain Summit Site Purpose : monitor urban haze.

The site is located on a mountain top in the North Mountain Recreati on Area of Phoenix. The high-resolution digital camera points toward S outh Mountain, which lies 27 km to the south. The pictures of the local views are updated ever y 5 minutes and can be viewed on the internet
at http://www.phoenixvis.net/somt1/index.html . The surrounding area is desert recreation area to the north and west and residential with so me commercial activity to the south and east.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 16480 Address west side of 7 th St. in North Mountain Recreation Area Phoenix, AZ

County Maricopa Groundcover Dirt/Desert

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.5855 Surrounding Area Residential/Desert Longitude -112.0722

Distance to road 850 m – E Elevation 625 m Traffic count 28,210 – 7 th St. Site Established Date 01/01/1993

Monitoring Information Monitor Visibility Network Urban Haze Objective Visibility Spatial Scale Urban Monitor Start Date 01/01/1993

Instrument Olympus SP500UZ

Camera Instrument Start Date 07/01/2003

Site Photos

Aerial view of North Mountain Summit Camera located on tower at North Mountain Summit – 2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 120Organ Pipe National Monument Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is owned by the NPS, who operates the monitor at the site. The site is located 1 km south/southwest of the national monument vis itor center, which is about 35.4 km south of Why, AZ. The site is about seven meters from a water pump house and lies about 540 meters east of a small mountain range. The surrounding ar ea is predominately desert. This is an IMPROVE protocol site.

Site Information AQS ID 04-019-0005 ADEQ ID 16681 Address SR 85 & Puerto Blanco Rd. Ajo, AZ 85321

County Pima Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Tucson Latitude 31.9499 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -112.8010

Distance to road 400 m – E Elevation 505 m Traffic count 1,525 – SR 85 Site Established Date 01/01/1971

Monitoring Information Monitor Aerosol Network IMPROVE Objective Background Spatial Scale Regional Monitor Start Date 01/15/2003 Instrument IMPROVE Instrument Start Date 01/15/2003

Site Photos

Regional view of Organ Pipe NM Shelter at Organ Pipe NM – 03/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 121Paul Spur Chemical Li me Plant Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network.

The site is located approximately 1 km to the northeast of the Chemical Lime Plant, just south of SR 80 between Bisbee and Douglas, and 3.5 km north of the Arizona/Mexico border. In 2011 the meteorological instruments were re-located to this site when the Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant South site was closed. The collocated PM 10 instrument was removed and replaced with a TEOM instrument to aid in the migratio n of this site to continuous monitoring. Other than the nearby Chemical Lime Plant, the surrounding area is predominately desert.

Site Information AQS ID 04-003-0011 ADEQ ID 16391 Address SR 80 & Paul Spur Rd. Paul Spur, AZ 85603

County Cochise Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude 31.3658 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -109.7309

Distance to road 50 m – S Elevation 1,278 m Traffic count 4,920 – SR 80 Site Established Date 01/01/1985

Monitoring Information Monitor PM 10 PM 10 Wind Temp/RH Network SLAMS SLAMS MET MET Objective Source Source Source Source Spatial Scale Middle Middle Middle Middle Monitor Start Date 01/06/1991 01/06/1991 12/01/2011 12/01/2011

Instrument Thermo Partisol 2000 R&P 1400 AB TEOM RM Young 5305 Anemometer Vaisala HMP155 Probe

Instrument Start Date 12/16/1997 01/12/2012 12/01/2011 12/01/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Paul Spur CLP Particulate monitors and meteorological tower at Paul Spur CLP – 01/2012

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 122Paul Spur Chemical Li me Plant South Site Purpose : meteorological support.

The site is located approximately 500 meters to the south/southeast of the Chemical Lime Plant, south of SR 80 between Bisbee and D ouglas, and 3.5 km north of the Arizona/Mexico border. The surrounding area is predominately desert. In December, 2011 this site was closed and meteorological instruments were added to th e Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant site, which is located approximately 1 km to the north/northeast.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 16392 Address South of Stonridge Rd. Paul Spur, AZ 85603

County Cochise Groundcover Dirt/Grass

CBSA Sierra Vista-Douglas Latitude 31.3543 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -109.7376

Distance to road 20 m – N Elevation 1,287 m Traffic count 4,920 – SR 80 Site Established Date 12/21/1995

Monitoring Information Monitor Wind Network MET Objective Middle Spatial Scale Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 12/21/1995

Instrument RM Young5103 Anemometer Instrument Start Date 12/16/1997

Site Photos

Aerial view of Paul Spur CLP South Meteorological tower at Paul Spur CLP South – 07/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 123Payson Well Site Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network.

The site is located in the southern area of Pays on, at a water well site. To the southeast of the site are two tanks. In general, the surrounding area is commercial with some residential land use. Directly to the west, on th e other side of a metal fence, is an auto repair shop and 290 meters to the east is SR 87. This site is used to meet the PM 10 collocation requirement.

Site Information AQS ID 04-007-0008 ADEQ ID 16317 Address 204 W. Aero Dr. Payson, AZ 85541

County Gila Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Payson Latitude 34.2294 Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -111.3297

Distance to road 80 m – S Elevation 1,501 m Traffic count 1,724 – Aero Dr. Site Established Date 01/01/1991

Monitoring Information Monitor PM 10 PM 10 Wind Temp/RH Network SLAMS SLAMS MET MET Objective Population Population Population Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Nei ghborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 01/01/1991 01/01/1991 05/30/1991 05/30/1991

Instrument R&P Partisol 2000 Thermo Partisol 2000 RM Young 5103 Anemometer Vaisala HMP 45C Probe

Instrument Start Date 06/30/2003 07/01/2009 05/30/1991 06/19/2003

Site Photos

Aerial view of Payson Well Site Payson Well Site meteorological tower and particulate monitor on platform – 04/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 124Petrified Forest Nation al Park Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is operated by the NPS and is located 1. 6 km north of park headquarters. The park sits along I-40 and the surro unding area is desert.

Site Information AQS ID 04-001-0012 ADEQ ID 16473 Address I-40 & Petrified Forest Rd. Pe trified Forest National Park, AZ

County Apache Groundcover Dirt

CBSA None Latitude 35.0770 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -109.7690

Distance to road 1,050 m – SW Elevation 1,766 m Traffic count 15,246 – I-40 Site Established Date 03/02/1988

Monitoring Information Monitor Aerosol Network IMPROVE Objective Visibility Spatial Scale Regional Monitor Start Date 03/02/1988 Instrument IMPROVE Instrument Start Date 03/02/1988

Site Photos

Regional view of Petrified Forest NP Photo of Petrified Forest NP taken from IMPROVE website – date unknown

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 125Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver Site Purpose : monitor urban haze.

The site is located in downtown Phoenix on the rooftop of the Holid ay Inn Hotel near 2 nd Avenue and Osborn Road. The transmitter is located on top of the Phoenix Baptist Hospital 4.5 km to the northwest. The area between the two sites is a mix of resi dential and commercial.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 16829 Address 3600 N. 2 nd Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85013

County Maricopa Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.4901 Surrounding Area Commercial/R esidential Longitude -112.0767

Distance to road 25 m – E Elevation 337 m Traffic count 1,5470 – Central Ave. Site Established Date 12/01/1992

Monitoring Information Monitor Bext Temp/RH Network Urban Haze Urban Haze Objective Urban Haze Urban Haze Spatial Scale Urban Urban Monitor Start Date 12/01/1992 01/01/1994

Instrument Optec LVP-2 Trans Receiver Rotronics MP101A Probe Instrument Start Date 12/01/1992 06/09/2003

Site Photos

Aerial view of Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver on hotel rooftop – 11/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 126Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter Site Purpose : monitor urban haze.

The transmitter is located on the rooftop of Phoenix Baptist Hospital at 19 th Avenue and Bethany Home Road. The receiver is located at the Holiday Inn Hotel 4.5 km to the southeast. The area between the two sites is a mix of residential and commercial.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 16330 Address 2000 W. Bethany Home Rd. Phoenix, AZ 85015

County Maricopa Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.5253 Surrounding Area Commercial/R esidential Longitude -112.1019

Distance to road 120 m – S Elevation 340 m Traffic count 40,950 – Bethany Home Rd. Site Established Date 12/01/1992

Monitoring Information Monitor Bext Network Urban Haze Objective Urban Haze Spatial Scale Urban Monitor Start Date 12/01/1992

Instrument Optec LVP-2 Transmissometer Instrument Start Date 12/01/1992

Site Photos

Aerial view of Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter No photo

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 127Pleasant Valley Ranger Station Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is operated by USFS. The site is lo cated on a hilltop south of Young, AZ, within the Sierra Ancha Wilderness and Tonto National Forest. The surrounding area is a transitional zone between desert and forest. The site lies 1,160 meters to the south of SR 288.

Site Information AQS ID 04-007-8100 ADEQ ID 16446 Address SR 288 & Old Cherry Rd. Young, AZ 85541

County Gila Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Payson Latitude 34.0908 Surrounding Area Desert/Forest Longitude -110.9419

Distance to road 250 m – N Elevation 1,587 m Traffic count 143 – SR 288 Site Established Date 01/01/2000

Monitoring Information Monitor Aerosol Network IMPROVE Objective Visibility Spatial Scale Regional Monitor Start Date 02/10/2000 Instrument IMPROVE Instrument Start Date 02/10/2000

Site Photos

Regional view of Pleasant Valley Ranger Station Shelter at Pleasant Valley Ranger Station – 08/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 128Prescott College AQD Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network and monitor smoke/public information.

The site is located at Prescott College on th e rooftop of the Mogoll on Building (#307). The surrounding area is residential a nd commercial, with a high tra ffic street approximately 20 meters to the east and large trees to the west. Du e to the close proximity of this site to the nearby road, ADEQ plans to relocate the ozone monitor to a more favorable location.

Site Information AQS ID 04-025-8033 ADEQ ID 133011 Address 330 Grove Ave., Prescott, AZ 86301

County Yavapai Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Prescott Latitude 34.5467 Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -112.4761

Distance to road 8 m – E Elevation 1,591 m Traffic count 21,945 – Grove Ave. Site Established Date 12/05/2006

Monitoring Information Monitor O 3 PM 2.5 Network SLAMS Non-regulatory SPM Objective Population Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 03/25/2008 07/13/2011

Instrument Thermo 49C O3 Analyzer Met One E-BAM Instrument Start Date 02/10/2012 07/13/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Prescott College AQD E-BAM on roof of Prescott College AQD – date unknown

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 129Prescott Valley Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network.

The site is located on the Prescott Police Depa rtment building about 1,100 meters to the north of SR 69. The surrounding area is mostly resi dential with some ar eas of open desert.

Site Information AQS ID 04-025-2002 ADEQ ID 18392 Address 7601 E. Civic Cir. Prescott Valley, AZ 86314

County Yavapai Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Prescott Latitude 34.5950 Surrounding Area Desert/Residential Longitude -112.3310

Distance to road 25 m – S Elevation 1,556 m Traffic count 2,400 – Civic Circle N. Site Established Date 03/12/2003

Monitoring Information Monitor PM 10 PM 2.5 Network SLAMS NAAQS-SPM Objective Population Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 03/16/2003 12/28/2007

Instrument R&P Partisol 2000 Thermo Partisol 2000 Instrument Start Date 12/28/2007 12/28/2007

Site Photos

Aerial view of Prescott Valley Particulate monitors on rooftop of Prescott Police Department – 10/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 130State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 131 Queen Valley Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network, PAMS netw ork, monitor regional haze, AQI forecasting, and IMPROVE program.
The site is located in northern Pinal County on the far east/southeastern outskirts of the Phoenix metropolitan area. It is located 635 meters southeast of the small town of Queen Valley, AZ and the surrounding area is primaril y desert. This is a downwind PAMS type 3 site. This is also an IMPORVE protocol site.

Site Information AQS ID 04-021-8001 ADEQ ID 16394 Address 10 S. Queen Anne Dr. Queen Valley, AZ 85219

County Pinal Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.2938 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -111.2857

Distance to road 87 m – W Elevation 668 m Traffic count 1,284 – Queen Anne Dr. Site Established Date 01/01/1998

Monitoring Information Monitor O 3 NOy VOC Wind Network SLAMS/PAMS PAMS PAMS MET Objective Transport Transport Transport Population Spatial Scale Urban Urban Urban Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 01/01/1998 01/01/1998 05/20/2001 06/23/2003

Instrument Teledyne API 400E O3 Analyzer Thermo 42C TL Reactive NOx Met One 8001 Canister Sampler RM Young 5103 Anemometer

Instrument Start Date 03/16/2011 05/09/2011 06/01/2010 04/19/2011

Monitoring Information Monitor Temp/RH Aerosol Network MET IMPROVE Objective Population Visibility Spatial Scale Neighborhood Regional Monitor Start Date 06/23/2003 04/30/2001

Instrument Vaisala HMP45C Probe IMPROVE

Instrument Start Date 04/19/2011 04/30/2001Site Photos

Regional view of Queen Valley Shelter at Queen Valley site – 5/10/2011

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 132Rillito Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network and a source permit requirement.

In February of 2007 the site was moved from th e Water St. location 91 meters southwest to its current location at a city water pumping stati on. The surrounding area is primarily residential and industrial, with I-10 approximately 250 meters to the east. The site is located within the small town of Rillito, AZ and is approximately 500 meters to the north/northwest of the Cal Portland Rillito Cement Plant.

Site Information AQS ID 04-019-0020 ADEQ ID 16499 Address 8840 W. Robinson St. Rillito, AZ 85653

County Pima Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Tucson Latitude 32.4143 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude -111.1545

Distance to road 7 m – S Elevation 626 m Traffic count 2,634 – I-10 Frontage Rd. Site Established Date 01/01/1985

Monitoring Information Monitor PM 10 Wind Temp/RH Network SLAMS MET MET Objective Source Source Source Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 01/03/1985 01/08/2004 03/30/2010

Instrument R&P 1400 AB TEOM RM Young 5103 Anemometer Vaisala HMP 45C Probe

Instrument Start Date 03/30/2010 01/08/2004 03/30/2010

Site Photos

Aerial view of Rillito Rillito meteorological tower and particulate monitors on platform – 03/2010

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 133Saguaro National Park East Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is located within the Saguaro Nati onal Park East, 805 meters south of park headquarters and is operated jointly by PDEQ and NPS. The area surrounding the site is scattered residential to the west and desert to the east.

Site Information AQS ID 04-019-0021 ADEQ ID 16474 Address 3905 S. Old Spanish Trail Tucson, AZ 85730

County Pima Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Tucson Latitude 32.1740 Surrounding Area Residential/Desert Longitude -110.7360

Distance to road 82 m – W Elevation 938 m Traffic count 6,198 – Old Spanish Tail Site Established Date 06/04/1988

Monitoring Information Monitor Aerosol Network IMPROVE Objective Visibility Spatial Scale Regional Monitor Start Date 06/04/1988 Instrument IMPROVE Instrument Start Date 06/04/1988

Site Photos

Regional view of Saguaro NP East Photo of Saguaro NP East taken from IMPROVE website – date unknown

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 134Saguaro National Park West Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is located within the Saguaro National Park West. The site is operated by the NPS. The area surrounding the site is re sidential to the northwest and south/southeast and desert to the northeast. The site lies approximately 17 km southwest of I-10. This is an IMPROVE protocol site.

Site Information AQS ID 04-019-9000 ADEQ ID 16475 Address N. Sandario Rd. and W. Mile Wide Rd. Tucson, AZ

County Pima Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Tucson Latitude 32.2485 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -111.2175

Distance to road 27 m – W Elevation 718 m Traffic count 1,889 – Mile Wide Rd. Site Established Date 12/29/1996

Monitoring Information Monitor Aerosol Network IMPROVE Objective Visibility Spatial Scale Regional Monitor Start Date 04/19/2001 Instrument IMPROVE Instrument Start Date 04/19/2001

Site Photos

Regional view of Saguaro NP West Shelters and towers at Saguaro NP West site – 03/2003

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 135San Luis Rio Colorado Site Purpose : special purpose monitoring.

The site is located at the Oomapas Well # 10 site at the corner of A v. Venustiano Carranza and C. 15 in San Luis Rio Colorado, Sonora, Mexico . The site is approximately 1.6 km south of the Arizona-Mexico border. The surrounding area is mixed commercial and residential use. *Note this site was previously used the in WASBAQS study. In the summer of 2011, this site was closed due to funding constraints.

Site Information AQS ID 80-026-8012 ADEQ ID 113221

Address Av. Venustiano Carranza and C. 15 in San Luis Rio Colorado, Sonora, Mexico County Sonora Groundcover Dirt

CBSA None Latitude 32.4664 Surrounding Area Commercial/R esidential Longitude -114.7688

Distance to road 5 m – S & E Elevation 41 m Traffic count n/a Site Established Date 07/05/2009

Monitoring Information Monitor PM 10 PM 2.5 Network Non-regulatory SPM Non-regulatory SPM Objective Population Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 07/05/2009 7/05/2009 Instrument Partisol Dichot Partisol Dichot Instrument Start Date 06/15/2009 06/15/2009

Site Photos

Aerial view of San Luis Rio Colorado No photo

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 136Sedona Fire Station AQ D Site Purpose : monitor smoke/public information.

In 2011, the EBAM instrument in Sedona was move d from the Sedona Post Office site to the Sedona Fire Station site due to concerns about local emi ssions affecting the monitor. The Sedona Fire Station site is lo cated approximately 300 meters to the northeast of the Sedona Post Office site. The surrounding area is com posed of residential and commercial use.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 142818 Address 310 Forest Rd, Sedona, AZ 86336

County Coconino Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 34.8683 Surrounding Area Commercial/R esidential Longitude -111.7633

Distance to road 30 m – S Elevation 1,326 m Traffic count n/a Site Established Date 12/16/2011

Monitoring Information Monitor PM 2.5 Network Non-regulatory SPM Objective Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 12/16/2011

Instrument Met One E-BAM Instrument Start Date 12/16/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Se dona Fire Station E-BAM on roof at Sedona Fire Station – 12/2011

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 137Sedona Post Office Site Purpose : monitor smoke/public information.

The site is located on the U.S. Post Office bu ilding and was establishe d to assess particulate concentrations in the Sedona area. The surround ing area is commercial and residential to the south and mainly hills to the north, east, and west. The site is located northeast of the intersection of SR 179 and SR 89A. This site was closed in December, 2011 , when the EBAM instrument was moved 300 meters northeas t to the Sedona Fire Station AQD site due to concerns about local emissi ons affecting the monitor.

Site Information AQS ID 04-005-1010 ADEQ ID 16512 Address 190 W. Highway 89A Sedona, AZ 86336

County Coconino Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 34.8667 Surrounding Area Commercial/R esidential Longitude -111.765

Distance to road 45 m – S Elevation 1,279 m Traffic count 25,193 – SR 89A Site Established Date 01/01/1992

Monitoring Information Monitor PM 2.5 Network Non-regulatory SPM Objective Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 08/02/2011

Instrument Met One E-BAM Instrument Start Date 08/02/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Sedona Post Office E-BAM on roof of Sedona Post Office – date unknown

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 138Show Low Site Purpose : monitor smoke/public information.

The site is located on the Historical Museum building and was origin ally established to demonstrate compliance with the PM 10 NAAQS. Currently the site is used for neighborhood monitoring of smoke. The surround ing area is residential and co mmercial. Show Low is the commercial and tourism hub of the western White Mountains and sees a seasonal increase in population by 5,000 people.

Site Information AQS ID 04-017-0007 ADEQ ID 16603 Address 561 E. Deuce of Clubs Show Low, AZ 85901

County Navajo Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA None Latitude 34.2525 Surrounding Area Commercial/R esidential Longitude -110.0364

Distance to road 36 m – NW Elevation 1,924 m Traffic count 9,500 – Deuce of Clubs Site Established Date 01/01/1974

Monitoring Information Monitor PM 2.5 Network Non-regulatory SPM Objective Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 06/08/2011

Instrument Met One E-BAM Instrument Start Date 06/08/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Show Low No Photo

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 139Sonora Nogales Fire Station Site Purpose : special purpose monitoring.

The site is located on the rooftop of the Fire Station in Nogales, Mexico, approximately 600 meters south of the Arizona/Mexico border . The surrounding area is urban with a mix of commercial and residential use. In the summer of 2011, this site was closed due to funding constraints.

Site Information AQS ID 80-026-0005 ADEQ ID 16399 Address Diaz and Avenue Adolfo Lop ez Mateos Nogales, Sonora, Mexico

County Sonora Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA None Latitude 31.3258 Surrounding Area Commercial/R esidential Longitude -110.9447

Distance to road 3 m – NE Elevation 1,202 m Traffic count n/a Site Established Date 11/01/1993

Monitoring Information Monitor PM 10 PM 2.5 Network Non-regulatory SPM Non-regulatory SPM Objective Population Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 11/01/1993 04/11/2010 Instrument Partisol 2000 Partisol 2000 Instrument Start Date 04/11/2010 04/11/2010

Site Photos

Aerial view of Sonora Nogales Fire Station No photo

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 140South Phoenix Site Purpose : toxics network.

The site is owned by MCAQD. ADEQ operates the toxics sampler at the site. The site is situated in South Phoenix, at the edge of a high population area, bordering a mixture of residential and commercial properties. Two high population areas are locate d north and west of the site.

Site Information AQS ID 04-013-4003 ADEQ ID 16377 Address 33 W. Tamarisk St. Phoenix, AZ 85041

County Maricopa Groundcover Asphalt

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.4030 Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -112.0750

Distance to road 83 m – W Elevation 330 m Traffic count 19,110 – Central Ave. Site Established Date 01/01/1997

Monitoring Information Monitor VOC Network TOXICS-UATMP Objective Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 08/05/2001

Instrument ATEC 8001 Canister Sampler Instrument Start Date 05/20/2010

Site Photos

Aerial view of South Phoenix Shelter and meteorological tower at South Phoenix site – 04/2005

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 141Springerville Site Purpose : monitor smoke/public information.

The site is located on the roof of the Apache County Public Hea lth Services District building. There is an open field to the s outh and west of the site, with SR 180/SR 260 to the east, and buildings to the north.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 135133 Address 323 S. Mountain Ave., Springerville, AZ 85936

County Apache Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA None Latitude 34.1284 Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -109.2891

Distance to road 8 m – SW Elevation 2,125 m Traffic count 10,616 – S. Mountain Ave. Site Established Date 09/24/2008

Monitoring Information Monitor PM 2.5 Network Non-regulatory SPM Objective Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 06/08/2011

Instrument Met One E-BAM Instrument Start Date 06/08/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Springerville Springerville E-BAM on roof of county building – 09/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 142Sycamore Canyon Site Purpose : monitor regional haze and IMPROVE program.

The site is located near the entrance to Camp Raymond Boy Scout Camp. Minimal obstructions exist in the area su rrounding the site and no routine human activity occurs in the area surrounding the site. Sycamor e Canyon Wilderness Area is 800 meters south of the site.

Site Information AQS ID 04-005-8103 ADEQ ID 16476 Address Camp Kimball Rd. Flagstaff, AZ (Camp Raymond)

County Coconino Groundcover Dirt/Grass

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 35.1406 Surrounding Area Forest Longitude -111.9692

Distance to road 33 m – NW Elevation 2,046 m Traffic count 15,048 – I-40 Site Established Date 09/11/1991

Monitoring Information Monitor Aerosol Network IMPROVE Objective Visibility Spatial Scale Regional Monitor Start Date 09/11/1991 Instrument IMPROVE Instrument Start Date 09/11/1991

Site Photos

Regional view of Sycamore Canyon Shelter at Sycamore Canyon site – 09/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 143Tonto National Monument Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network, monitor regional haze, AQI forecasting, downwind transport from Phoeni x area, and IMPROVE program.

The site is jointly operated by ADEQ and USFS. The site is located within the Tonto National Forest at the base of Tonto National Monumen t, about 40 meters south of SR 188. The area surrounding the site is desert with Roos evelt Lake about 1 km to the north.

Site Information AQS ID 04-007-0010 ADEQ ID 16447 Address South of SR 188 Roosevelt, AZ 85545

County Gila Groundcover Dirt/Rock

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.6547 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude -111.1074

Distance to road 17 m – NE Elevation 786 m Traffic count 1,073 – SR 188 Site Established Date 04/23/1988

Monitoring Information Monitor O 3 Aerosol Network SLAMS IMPROVE Objective Transport Visibility Spatial Scale Urban Regional Monitor Start Date 05/22/2002 04/23/1988

Instrument Teledyne API 400E O3 Analyzer IMPROVE

Instrument Start Date 03/16/2011 04/23/1998

Site Photos

Regional view of Tonto NM Shelter at Tonto NM site – 07/2011

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 144State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 145 Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Site Purpose : AQI forecasting, PAMS, special study, m onitor urban haze, and meteorological support.

The site is located in the northwest corner of the Vehicle Emissions Laboratory property. The surrounding area is a both resident ial and commercial, with an open field directly to the northwest. The site is about 415 meters south of Red Mountain Freeway (Loop 202).

Site Information AQS ID 04-013-9998 ADEQ ID 16363 Address 600 N. 40 th St. Phoenix, AZ 85008

County Maricopa Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Latitude 33.4553 Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude -111.9961

Distance to road 66 m – E Elevation 356 m Traffic count 12,740 – 40 th St. Site Established Date 04/01/1987

Monitoring Information Monitor Bscat/PM 2.5 Wind Temp/RH Delta Temp Network Urban Haze MET Urban Haze PAMS Objective Population Population Population Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Nei ghborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 06/25/2003 05/11/1999 05/11/1999 08/20/2004

Instrument Optec NGN 2 Nephelometer RM Young 5305 Anemometer Rotronics MP101A Probe RM Young RTD 7627 Delta Temp System Instrument Start Date 06/25/2003 05/11/1999 06/30/2003 08/20/2004

Monitoring Information

Monitor Ultraviolet Solar Radiation Total Horizontal Solar Radiation Wind Profiler

Network PAMS PAMS PAMS Objective Population Population Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 08/20/2004 06/18/1999 01/01/1998

Instrument Epply TUVR Ultraviolet

Sensor Li-Cor LI-200S2 Pyranometer Vaisala LAP-3000 Wind Profiler Instrument Start Date 08/20/2004 06/18/1999 01/01/1998Site Photos

Aerial view of Vehicl e Emissions Laboratory Wind profiler, meteorological tower, and shelter at VEL – 04/12/2005

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 146Verde Ranger Station Site Purpose : monitor smoke/public information

The site is located at the Verde Ranger Stati on in Camp Verde. The monitor is located on a metal platform that is on a concrete slab surrounded by dirt and rocks. Ranger Station buildings are to the northeast and northwest and there are sola r panels to the east of the monitor.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 138696 Address 300 E. Highway 260 Camp Verde, AZ 86322

County Yavapai Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Prescott Latitude 34.5489 Surrounding Area Residential/Desert Longitude -111.8472

Distance to road 70 m – S Elevation 945 m Traffic count 6,075 – SR 260 Site Established Date 01/01/2008

Monitoring Information Monitor PM 2.5 Network Non-regulatory SPM Objective Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 08/02/2011

Instrument Met One E-BAM Instrument Start Date 08/02/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Verde Ranger Station E-BAM on platform at Verde Ranger Station – 2/2010

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 147State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 148 Yuma Supersite Site Purpose : NAAQS compliance network and AQI forecasting.

The site was reopened in 2008 and has been used to consolidate air qual ity monitors in the Yuma area to one site. The site is located on the southeast corner of the Rural Metro Administration Facility propert y. The surrounding area is commer cial and industrial, with a dirt lot adjacent to the south and I-8 1 km to the northeast. In addition to NAAQS compliance, the site is also used to help understand transport of PM and Ozone.

Site Information AQS ID 04-027-8011 ADEQ ID 113219 Address 2323 S. Arizona Ave. Yuma, AZ 85364

County Yuma Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Yuma Latitude 32.6903 Surrounding Area Commercia l/Industrial Longitude -114.6144

Distance to road 91 m – W Elevation 60 m Traffic count 12,302 – Arizona Ave. Site Established Date 02/01/2006

Monitoring Information Monitor O 3 PM 10 PM 2.5 Wind Network SLAMS SLAMS SPM MET Objective Population Population Population Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Nei ghborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 05/06/2008 12/01/2009 01/01/2010 03/17/2010

Instrument Teledyne API 400E O3 Analyzer R&P 1400 AB TEOM R&P Partisol 2000 RM Young 5305 Anemometer Instrument Start Date 03/03/2011 12/01/2009 01/01/2010 03/17/2010

Monitoring Information Monitor Temp/RH Network MET Objective Population Spatial Scale Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 03/17/2010

Instrument Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Instrument Start Date 03/17/2010Site Photos

Aerial view of Yuma Supersite Shelter and Met Tower at Yuma Supersite – 5/19/2011

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 149Appendix E – 2012 EPA Monitoring ScheduleState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2012, Page 150

### Appendix F – Data Quality Indicator Report

This Appendix provides documentation of the Quality Control / Quality Assurance requirements for all monitors within ADEQ’s criteria pollutant network for calendar year 2011. For a detailed interpretation of this report, see ADEQ’s 2011 data certification letter.

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 151UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Jun. 4, 2012 Report Request ID: 996565 Report Code: AMP255

Selection Criteria Page 1 User ID: BNE

State County City

Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date

04 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

PROTOCOL SELECTIONS

Parameter Classification Parameter Method Duration

APP_A_PARAMETERS PQAO SELECTIONS Freeport McMoRan Miami, Inc.
Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality

SELECTED OPTIONS

INCLUDE ONLY APPENDIX A

MONITORS
RESTRICT TO MONITORING

SEASONS
MERGE PDF FILES Option Type Option Value

NO

YES

YES

GLOBAL DATES

2011 Start Date End Date

2011 01 01 12 31 Tribal
CodeUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Jun. 4, 2012 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 1 of 14 

# Code Listing

The following codes may be seen in the "MT" column throughout this report. Please be advised that not all of the

codes may appear in the report. They are provided for completeness.

NR S P T SP I NC IX ID N NA CN F O PN ST VS QA X SS SU SU TS U UP W M NON-REGULATORY SLAMS PAMS TRIBAL MONITORS SPECIAL PURPOSE IMPROVE NCORE INDEX SITE INDUSTRIAL NAMS NATTS CASTNET NON-EPA FEDERAL OTHER PROPOSED NCORE SCHOOL AIR TOXICS VOL SCHOOL AT QA COLLOCATED SECURED SLAMS SPECIATION SUPLMNTL SPECIATION SUPPLMNTL SPECIATION TRENDS SPECIATION UNKNOWN UNOFFICIAL PAMS WHO WMO Code Description Description 

# Notes About this Report

If you see this value for a column in a summarized row, this means that more than one occurence exist in the summary. For example, if you have a PQAO summary that spans multiple States, you would see this value in the States column. M

Code For specific information about the fields appearing within this report, please refer to the README.txt file that is included with the WORKFILE output for this report.UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Jun. 4, 2012 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 2 of 14 

## 1-Point Quality Control

CO

NO2

O3

SO2 Pollutant:

Pollutant:

Pollutant:

Pollutant: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) PQAO:

PQAO:

PQAO:

PQAO: Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes App A?:

App A?:

App A?:

App A?: Year

Year

Year

Year Region

Region

Region

Region State

State

State

State Site ID

Site ID

Site ID

Site ID POC

POC

POC

POC MT

MT

MT

MT Begin

Date

Begin Date

Begin Date

Begin Date End

Date

End Date

End Date

End Date # Req

# Req

# Req

# Req # Obs

# Obs

# Obs

# Obs %

Complete

% Complete

% Complete

% Complete CV

CV

CV

CV Bias

Bias

Bias

Bias 2011 2011 SUMMARY

2011 2011 SUMMARY

2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 SUMMARY

2011 2011 2011 09

09 09

09 09 09

09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09

09 09 09 AZ AZ AZ

AZ AZ AZ

AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ

AZ AZ AZ 04-013-9997 SUMMARY

04-013-9997 SUMMARY

04-005-1008 04-007-0010 04-012-8000 04-013-9997 04-021-8001 04-025-8033 04-027-8011 SUMMARY

04-007-0009 04-007-1001 04-013-9997 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 3 1 S-NC

S

S S S S-NC S S S

S S S-NC 01-JAN-11

01-JAN-11

01-APR-11 01-APR-11 01-APR-11 01-JAN-11 01-APR-11 01-APR-11 01-APR-11

01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11

31-DEC-11

31-OCT-11 31-OCT-11 31-OCT-11 31-DEC-11 31-OCT-11 31-OCT-11 31-OCT-11

31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 26

26 26

26 26 26

15 15 15 26 15 15 15 116 116

26 26 26 15

15 15

21 21 21

11 9 11 18 14 14 12 89 89

22 21 28 58

58 58

81 81 81

73 60 73 69 93 93 80
77
77

85 81 100 7.09

7.09 7.09

2.96 2.96 2.96

4.35 4.98 4.43 3.58 4.60 4.08 2.18 3.14 3.14

3.24 3.87 7.03 5.74

5.74 5.74

2.51 2.51 2.51

3.87 4.02 3.64 3.30 3.84 3.76 2.03 2.77 2.77

3.35 3.74 4.65 +/- +/- +/-

+

+

+

+ +/- +/-

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+ +/-UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Jun. 4, 2012 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 3 of 14 

## 1-Point Quality Control

SO2 Pollutant: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) PQAO: Yes App A?:

Year Region State Site ID POC MT Begin Date End

Date # Req # Obs % Complete CV Bias
2011 SUMMARY 09

09 AZ AZ SUMMARY 78 78 71

71 89

89 4.97

4.97 3.58

3.58 +/- +/-UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Jun. 4, 2012 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 4 of 14 

## Annual Performance Evaluations

CO

NO2

O3 Pollutant:

Pollutant:

Pollutant: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) PQAO:

PQAO:

PQAO: Yes

Yes

Yes Year

Year

Year Region

Region

Region State

State

State Site ID

Site ID

Site ID POC

POC

POC MT

MT

MT Begin

Date

Begin Date

Begin Date End

Date

End Date

End Date 2011

2011

SUMMARY

2011

2011

SUMMARY

2011

2011 09

09

09

09

09

09

09

09 AZ

AZ

AZ

AZ

AZ

AZ

AZ

AZ 04-013-9997

SUMMARY

04-013-9997

SUMMARY

04-005-1008

04-007-0010 1

1

1

1 S-NC

S

S

S 01-JAN-11

01-JAN-11

01-APR-11

01-APR-11 31-DEC-11

31-DEC-11

31-OCT-11

31-OCT-11 App A?:

App A?:

App A?: 81.30

81.30

81.30 23.43

23.43

23.43 7.94

7.94

7.94

1.36

3.41 2.62

2.62

2.62

-1.13

4.38 0

0

0

3

3

3

0

0 0

0

0

0

0

0

5

0 4

4

4

4

4

4

0

5 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 Avg %D / Level

Avg %D / Level

Avg %D / Level L1/6

L1/6

L1/6 L2/7

L2/7

L2/7 L3/8

L3/8

L3/8 L4/9

L4/9

L4/9 L5/10

L5/10

L5/10 Q1

Q1

Q1 Q2

Q2

Q2 Q3

Q3

Q3 Q4

Q4

Q4 Obs / Q

Obs / Q

Obs / Q Met?

Met?

Met? Criteria

Criteria

Criteria Y

N

Y

Y 100

100

0

0 -9.08

-9.08

-3.73

-3.73 11.64

11.64

5.41

5.41 Conf. Limits

Conf. Limits

Conf. Limits Lower

Lower

Lower Upper

Upper

Upper 50

50

71

71 % Btwn

% Btwn

% Btwn Conf. Limits

Conf. Limits

Conf. Limits 1-Point

1-Point

1-Point -1.69

-1.69

-1.69

-1.90 -3.51

-3.51

-3.51

-2.00 -2.02 (Levels 6 thru 10)

(Levels 6 thru 10)

(Levels 6 thru 10)

(Levels 6 thru 10)

(Levels 6 thru 10)

(Levels 6 thru 10)

(Levels 6 thru 10)UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Jun. 4, 2012 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 5 of 14 

## Annual Performance Evaluations

O3

SO2 Pollutant:

Pollutant: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) PQAO:

PQAO: Yes

Yes Year

Year Region

Region State

State Site ID

Site ID POC

POC MT

MT Begin

Date

Begin Date End

Date

End Date 2011

2011

2011

2011

2011

2011

SUMMARY

2011 09

09

09

09

09

09

09

09 AZ

AZ

AZ

AZ

AZ

AZ

AZ

AZ 04-012-8000

04-013-9997

04-021-8001

04-025-8033

04-027-8011

SUMMARY

04-007-0009 1

1

1

1

1

1 S

S-NC

S

S

S

S 01-APR-11

01-JAN-11

01-APR-11

01-APR-11

01-APR-11

01-JAN-11 31-OCT-11

31-DEC-11

31-OCT-11

31-OCT-11

31-OCT-11

31-DEC-11 App A?:

App A?: 0.00

0.00

0.00 0.00

3.73

9.56

-0.45

0.00

2.52

2.52 -2.25

1.92

3.88

-1.38

-2.88

0.36

0.36 0

5

0

0

0

5

5

0 0

0

0

5

5

15

15

5 5

5

5

0

0

20

20

0 0

5

0

0

0

5

5

0 Avg %D / Level

Avg %D / Level L1/6

L1/6 L2/7

L2/7 L3/8

L3/8 L4/9

L4/9 L5/10

L5/10 Q1

Q1 Q2

Q2 Q3

Q3 Q4

Q4 Obs / Q

Obs / Q Met?

Met? Criteria

Criteria Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y 100

100 -3.92

-3.92 7.18

7.18 Conf. Limits

Conf. Limits Lower

Lower Upper

Upper 98

98 % Btwn

% Btwn Conf. Limits

Conf. Limits 1-Point

1-Point 5.90

-2.00

2.95

2.20

-0.80

-3.00

0.48

0.48

5.08 5.86

-2.46

2.18

1.15

-0.85

-2.92

0.14

0.14

4.24 5.10 -0.85

-0.85

-0.85

5.66 7.00

-2.93

1.94

-1.90

-0.82

-2.93

-0.24

-0.24

4.89 (Levels 6 thru 10)

(Levels 6 thru 10)

(Levels 6 thru 10)

(Levels 6 thru 10)

(Levels 6 thru 10)

(Levels 6 thru 10)

(Levels 6 thru 10)

(Levels 6 thru 10)

(Levels 6 thru 10)UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Jun. 4, 2012 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 6 of 14 

## Annual Performance Evaluations

SO2 Pollutant: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) PQAO: Yes

Year Region State Site ID POC MT Begin Date End

Date

2011

2011

2011

SUMMARY 09

09

09

09 AZ

AZ

AZ

AZ 04-007-1001

04-013-9997

SUMMARY 3

1 S

S-NC 01-JAN-11

01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11

31-DEC-11 App A?:

-8.38

-8.38

-8.38 -2.13

-2.13

-2.13 -8.04

-8.04

-8.04 -9.80

-9.80

-9.80 0

3

3

3 0

0

5

5 5

13

18

18 0

8

8

8 Avg %D / Level L1/6 L2/7 L3/8 L4/9 L5/10 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Obs / Q Met?

Criteria

Y

Y

100

100 -7.72

-7.72 9.58

9.58 Conf. Limits Lower Upper

65

65 % Btwn Conf. Limits 1-Point

-1.08

-18.30

-4.77

-4.77 1.04

-24.60

-6.44

-6.44 0.20

-7.23

-0.64

-0.64 1.26

-38.29

-10.46

-10.46 0.49

-5.97

-0.20

-0.20 (Levels 6 thru 10)

(Levels 6 thru 10)

(Levels 6 thru 10)

(Levels 6 thru 10)UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Jun. 4, 2012 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 7 of 14 

## Flow Rate Verifications

LEAD

PM10

PM10 Pollutant:

Pollutant:

Pollutant: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

1357 (Freeport McMoRan Miami, Inc.) PQAO:

PQAO:

PQAO: Yes

Yes

Yes App A?:

App A?:

App A?: Year

Year

Year Region

Region

Region State

State

State Site ID

Site ID

Site ID POC

POC

POC MT

MT

MT Begin

Date

Begin Date

Begin Date End

Date

End Date

End Date # Req

# Req

# Req # Obs

# Obs

# Obs % Complete

% Complete

% Complete Bias

Bias

Bias 2011 2011 2011 2011 SUMMARY

2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 SUMMARY

2011 2011 09

09 09 09 09

09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09

09 09 AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ

AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ

AZ AZ 04-007-1002 04-007-1002 04-007-8000 SUMMARY

04-003-0011 04-003-0011 04-003-1005 04-005-1008 04-007-0008 04-007-0008 04-007-1001 04-013-8006 04-013-9997 04-013-9997 04-015-1003 04-019-0001 04-019-0020 04-023-0004 04-023-0004 04-025-2002 04-027-8011 SUMMARY

04-007-0009 04-007-8000 1

2 1

1 2 1 1 1 2 3 1 3 4 1 3 3 1 3 1 3

1 1 S S S

S QA S S S QA S SP S S S S S S SP S S

ID ID 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11

01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11

01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11

31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11

31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 30-JUN-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11

31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 4

4 4 12 12

12 12 12 12 12 12 12 6 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 198 198

12 12 38

41 38 117 117

13 13 13 15 13 13 12 7 11 11 14 14 13 14 14 14 14 218 218

40 39 100 100 100 100 100

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 92 92 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99

100 100 4.24

3.93 4.02 3.76 3.76

2.12 1.27 0.72 1.09 1.35 1.32 1.15 1.57 0.86 0.96 0.60 1.21 0.84 0.80 1.43 0.61 1.54 0.89 0.89

1.66 1.88 +/- +/- +/- +/- +/-

+/- +/- +/- +/- +/- +/- +/- +/- +/-

+

+ +/- +/- +/-

+ +/- +/- +/- +/-

- +/- Average % D

Average % D

Average % D -0.06 -0.71 -1.00 -0.59 -0.59

-0.66 0.13 0.21 -0.14 0.09 0.34 -0.01 0.37 0.17 0.66 0.34 0.46 0.17 -0.23 0.65 -0.13 0.40 0.16 0.16

-0.80 -0.43UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Jun. 4, 2012 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 8 of 14 

## Flow Rate Verifications

PM10

PM2.5 Pollutant:

Pollutant: 1357 (Freeport McMoRan Miami, Inc.)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) PQAO:

PQAO: Yes

Yes App A?:

App A?: Year

Year Region

Region State

State Site ID

Site ID POC

POC MT

MT Begin

Date

Begin Date End

Date

End Date # Req

# Req # Obs

# Obs % Complete

% Complete Bias

Bias 2011 2011 SUMMARY

2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 SUMMARY 09

09 09

09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 AZ AZ AZ

AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ 04-007-8000 SUMMARY

04-003-1005 04-005-1008 04-013-9997 04-013-9997 04-013-9997 04-023-0004 04-023-0004 04-025-2002 04-027-8011 SUMMARY 2

1 1 1 2 3 1 2 1 1 ID-QA

S S S-NC QA PN-QA S QA S S 01-JAN-11

01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11

31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 30-JUN-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 12

36 36

12 12 12 6 12 12 12 12 12 102 102 39

118 118

13 14 11 6 11 14 13 14 13 109 109 100 100 100

100 100 92 100 92 100 100 100 100 98 98 1.33

1.52 1.52

1.05 1.12 1.07 35.05 0.77 1.16 0.76 1.02 1.12 2.40 2.40 +/- +/- +/-

+ +/- +/- +/-

+ +/- +/- +/- +/- +/- +/- Average % D

Average % D -0.66 -0.63 -0.63

0.55 0.15 0.44 12.11 0.39 0.23 0.08 -0.03 0.23 0.90 0.90UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Jun. 4, 2012 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 9 of 14 

## Semi-Annual Flow Rate Audits

LEAD

PM10

PM10 Pollutant:

Pollutant:

Pollutant: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

1357 (Freeport McMoRan Miami, Inc.) PQAO:

PQAO:

PQAO: Yes

Yes

Yes Year

Year Region

Region State

State Site ID

Site ID POC

POC MT

MT Begin

Date

Begin Date End

Date

End Date 2011 2011 2011 2011 SUMMARY

2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 SUMMARY 09

09 09 09 09

09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ

AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ 04-007-1002 04-007-1002 04-007-8000 SUMMARY

04-003-0011 04-003-0011 04-003-1005 04-005-1008 04-007-0008 04-007-0008 04-007-1001 04-013-8006 04-013-9997 04-013-9997 04-015-1003 04-019-0001 04-019-0020 04-023-0004 04-023-0004 04-025-2002 04-027-8011 SUMMARY 1

2 1

1 2 1 1 1 2 3 1 3 4 1 3 3 1 3 1 3 S S S

S QA S S S QA S SP S S S S S S SP S S 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11

01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11

31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11

31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 30-JUN-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 App A?:

App A?:

App A?: 2 2 2 6 6

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 33 33 4 4 4 12 12

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 32 32 100

100 100 100 100

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 50 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 97 97 -0.4 -0.1 1.1 0.2 0.2

-1.2 -0.5 -0.1 1.1 0.2 1.3 0.9 2.4 -3.8 0.2 0.4 0.9 1.7 -0.9 -0.4 1.1 1.1 0.3 0.3 # Req

# Req #Q w/ Data

#Q w/ Data Avg %d

Avg %d Met?

Met? Criteria

Criteria Y Y Y

Y Y Y N N N Y Y N N Y Y Y Y Y N Y 100 100

65 65 -8.85 -8.85

-1.95 -1.95 7.67 7.67

2.27 2.27 Conf. Limits

Conf. Limits Lower

Lower Upper

Upper 100

100

88 88 % Between

% Between Conf. Limits

Conf. Limits Flow Rate

Flow Rate

Flow Rate % Complete

% Complete 1

1 1 3 3

1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 7 7 1 1 1 3 3

0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 10 10 1 1 1 3 3

1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 7 7 1 1 1 3 3

0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 8 8 Q1

Q1 Q2

Q2 Q3

Q3 Q4

Q4 Obs / Q

Obs / QUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Jun. 4, 2012 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 10 of 14 

## Semi-Annual Flow Rate Audits

PM10

PM2.5 Pollutant:

Pollutant: 1357 (Freeport McMoRan Miami, Inc.)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) PQAO:

PQAO: Yes

Yes Year

Year Region

Region State

State Site ID

Site ID POC

POC MT

MT Begin

Date

Begin Date End

Date

End Date 2011 2011 2011 2011 SUMMARY

2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 SUMMARY 09

09 09 09 09

09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ

AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ 04-007-0009 04-007-8000 04-007-8000 SUMMARY

04-003-1005 04-005-1008 04-013-9997 04-013-9997 04-013-9997 04-023-0004 04-023-0004 04-025-2002 04-027-8011 SUMMARY 1

1 2

1 1 1 2 3 1 2 1 1 ID ID ID-QA

S S S-NC QA PN-QA S QA S S 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11

01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11 31-DEC-11

31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11

31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 30-JUN-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11 App A?:

App A?: 2 2 2 6 6

2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 17 17 2 2 2 6 6

2 2 3 1 1 2 2 2 2 17 17 100

100 100 100 100

100 100 100 100 50 100 100 100 100 94 94 -0.8 -1.1 -1.9 -1.3 -1.3

-0.3 0.3 -0.5 7.0 -0.2 -1.4 -0.4 0.0 -0.1 0.5 0.5 # Req

# Req #Q w/ Data

#Q w/ Data Avg %d

Avg %d Met?

Met? Criteria

Criteria Y Y Y

Y N Y Y N Y Y N Y 100 100

67 67 -3.65 -3.65

-12.05 -12.05 2.39 2.39

13.85 13.85 Conf. Limits

Conf. Limits Lower

Lower Upper

Upper 90

90

100 100 % Between

% Between Conf. Limits

Conf. Limits Flow Rate

Flow Rate % Complete

% Complete 0

0 0 0 0

1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 4 4 3 3 6 12 12

0 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 6 6 0 0 0 0 0

1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 4 4 3 3 3 9 9

0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 4 Q1

Q1 Q2

Q2 Q3

Q3 Q4

Q4 Obs / Q

Obs / QUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Jun. 4, 2012 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 11 of 14 

## Collocation Detail

LEAD

PM10

PM10

PM2.5 Pollutant:

Pollutant:

Pollutant:

Pollutant: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

1357 (Freeport McMoRan Miami, Inc.)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) PQAO:

PQAO:

PQAO:

PQAO: Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes App A?:

App A?:

App A?:

App A?: Year

Year

Year

Year Region

Region

Region

Region State

State

State

State Site ID

Site ID

Site ID

Site ID POC

POC

POC

POC MT

MT

MT

MT Begin

Date

Begin Date

Begin Date

Begin Date End

Date

End Date

End Date

End Date # Req

# Req

# Req

# Req # Obs

# Obs

# Obs

# Obs %

Complete

% Complete

% Complete

% Complete CV

CV

CV

CV 2011

2011 2011

2011

2011 2011 2011 09

09 09

09

09 09 09 AZ

AZ AZ

AZ

AZ AZ AZ 04-007-1002

04-003-0011 04-007-0008

04-007-8000

04-013-9997 04-023-0004 04-013-9997 1

1 1

1

1 1 1 S

S S

ID

S-NC S S-NC 01-JAN-11

01-JAN-11 01-JAN-11

01-JAN-11

02-JUL-11 03-JAN-11 03-JAN-11 31-DEC-11

31-DEC-11 31-DEC-11

31-DEC-11

29-DEC-11 29-DEC-11 29-JUN-11 30

30 30

30

15 30 14 50

49
55

12

60 54 97 100

100 100

40

100 100 100 7.65

14.27 8.51

8.37

14.53 14.91 12.84 14129

81102 81102

81102

88101 88101 88101 Parameter Code

Parameter Code

Parameter Code

Parameter Code Method

Method

Method

Method
143 143 145 # Valid

# Valid

# Valid

# Valid 40

46 54

12

60 52 91UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Jun. 4, 2012 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 12 of 14 

## Collocation Summary

LEAD

PM10

PM10

PM2.5 Pollutant:

Pollutant:

Pollutant:

Pollutant: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

1357 (Freeport McMoRan Miami, Inc.)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) PQAO:

PQAO:

PQAO:

PQAO: Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes App A?:

App A?:

App A?:

App A?: Year

Year

Year

Year Region

Region

Region

Region State

State

State

State # Req

# Req

# Req

# Req # Obs

# Obs

# Obs

# Obs %

Complete

% Complete

% Complete

% Complete CV

CV

CV

CV 2011 SUMMARY

2011 SUMMARY

2011 SUMMARY

2011 2011 2011 2011 SUMMARY 09 09

09 09

09 09

09 09 09 09 09 AZ AZ

AZ AZ

AZ AZ

AZ AZ AZ AZ AZ 30

60

30

30 30 30 50

104

12

114 97 0 100

100

100 100

40 40

100 100 0 67 67 7.65

7.65

11.00 11.00

8.37 8.37

14.81 12.84

13.53 13.53 # Sites

# Sites

# Sites

# Sites 2

13

2

6 1 1 # Collocated Required

# Collocated Required

# Collocated Required

# Collocated Required 1

2

1

1 1 1 # Actually Collocated

# Actually Collocated

# Actually Collocated

# Actually Collocated 1

2

1

2 1 0 % Req. Sites

Collocated

% Req. Sites Collocated

% Req. Sites Collocated

% Req. Sites Collocated 100 100

100 100

100 100

100 100 0 67 67 143 145 170 SUMMARY Method

Method

Method

Method # Valid Obs

# Valid Obs

# Valid Obs

# Valid Obs 40 40

100 100

12 12

112 91 0 203 203UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Jun. 4, 2012 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 13 of 14 

## Performance Evaluation Program (PEP)

LEAD

PM2.5 Pollutant:

Pollutant: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality)

0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) PQAO:

PQAO: Yes

Yes App A?:

App A?: Year

Year Region

Region State

State # Collocated PEP Coll.

# Collocated PEP Coll. %

Complete

% Complete Bias

Bias 2011 SUMMARY

2011 SUMMARY 09

09

09 09 AZ AZ

AZ AZ 0

0 0

0

88 88 10.70

10.70 # Sites

# Sites 2

6 #PEP Required

#PEP Required 1

8 # PEP Collected

# PEP Collected 0

7 # Collocated PEP Req

# Collocated PEP Req 4

0

-

- -26.96

-26.96 5.56

5.56 Conf. Limits

Conf. Limits Lower

Lower Upper

UpperUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

Jun. 4, 2012 

## DATA QUALITY INDICATOR REPORT

Page 14 of 14 

## Audit Strip Analysis

LEAD Pollutant: 0053 (Arizona Department Of Environmental Quality) PQAO: Yes

Year Region State 2011 SUMMARY 09

09 AZ AZ App A?:

100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 % Completeness

+/- +/- 4.02 4.02 Bias 100 100 Year Lab Id 1394 1394

### Appendix G – ADEQ PM 2.5 

### Sampling Frequency Clarif ications and Request for Sampling Frequency Reductions

This Appendix contains a copy of the letter from ADEQ to the EPA clarifying and requesting PM 2.5 sampling frequency deviations from the CFR.

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 167

### Appendix H – Proposed Changes to SO 2 

### and PM 10 

### Networks in Miami and Hayden, AZ

This Appendix contains a copy of the letter from ADEQ to EPA regarding proposed changes to SO 2 and PM 10 monitoring in the towns of Miami and Hayden, Arizona.

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 171

### Appendix I – Criteria Pollutant Minimum Monitoring Requirements

This appendix contains tables th at summarize the criteria pollutant minimum monitoring requirements for each MSA or CBSA that ADEQ is designated as the Primary Quality Assurance Organization (PQAO). Minimum monitoring requirements for the Phoenix-Me sa-Scottsdale and Tucson MSAs are not included within this appendix as ADEQ is not the PQAO for these MSAs.

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 180O 3 (Note: Refer to section 4.1 and Tabl e D-2 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58)

Table 1. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for O 3 . MSA County 2010 Census Population 2009-2011 8-hr Design Value (ppb) Design Value Site # of Required Monitors # of Active Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 67 Flagstaff Middle School 1 1 0

Prescott Yavapai 211,033 66 Prescott College AQD 1 1 0

Yuma Yuma 195,751 73 Yuma Supersite 1 1 0 Lake Havasu-Kingman Mohave 200,186 NA NA 0 0 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Alamo Lake, JLG Supersite, Queen Valley , and Tonto National Monument.

_________________________________________________________________________

PM 2.5 (Note: Refer to sections 4.7.1, 4.7.2 a nd Table D-5 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58)

Table 2a. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for PM 2.5 SLAMS. (FRM/FEM/ARM, see 40CFR 58 App D Section 4.7.1 and Table D-5) MSA County 2010 Census Population 2009-2011 Annual Design Value ( μ g/m 3 ) Annual Design Value Site 2009-2011 Daily Design Value ( μ g/m 3 ) Daily Design Value Site # of Required SLAMS Monitors # of Active SLAMS Monitors # of Additional

SLAMS Monitors Needed Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 5.9 Flagstaff Middle School 14 Flagstaff Middle School 0 1 0

Prescott Yavapai 211,033 4.3 Prescott Valley 10 Prescott Valley 0 1 0

Yuma Yuma 195,751 7.5 Yuma Supersite 15 Yuma Supersite 0 1 0

Lake HavasuKingman Mohave 200,186 NA NA NA NA 0 0 0

Table 2b. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for continuous PM 2.5 monitors. (FEM/ARM and non-FEM, see 40CFR 58 App D Section 4.7.2) MSA County 2010 Census Population 2009-2011 Annual Design Value ( μ g/m 3 ) Annual Design Value Site 2009-2011 Daily Design Value ( μ g/m 3 ) Daily Design Value Site # of Required Continuous Monitors # of Active Continuous Monitors # of Additional Continuous Monitors Needed Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 5.9 Flagstaff Middle School 14 Flagstaff Middle School 0 1* 0

Prescott Yavapai 211,033 4.3 Prescott Valley 10 Prescott Valley 0 1* 0

Yuma Yuma 195,751 7.5 Yuma Supersite 15 Yuma Supersite 0 0 0

Lake HavasuKingman Mohave 200,186 NA NA NA NA 0 0 0

* Conitnuous monitors are not FRMs, FEMS, or ARMs Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Nogales Post Office.

_________________________________________________________________________

PM 10 (Note: Refer to section 4.6 and Tabl e D-4 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58)

Table 3. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for PM 10 . MSA County 2010 Census Population 2009-2011 Max Concentration [ μ g/m 3 ] Max Concentration Site # of Required Monitors # of Active Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 61 Flagstaff Middle School 0 1 0 Prescott Yavapai 211,033 90 Prescott Valley 0 1 0 Yuma Yuma 195,751 306 Yuma Supersite 1-2 1 0 Lake Havasu-Kingman Mohave 200,186 132 Bullhead City 0-1 1 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Pl an: Ajo, Bullhead City, Douglas Red Cross, Hayden Old Jail, JLG Supersite, Miami Gol f Course, Miami Ridgeline, Nogales Post Office, Paul Spur Chemical Li me Plant, Payson Well Site, Rillito, and Yuma Supersite.

_________________________________________________________________________

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 181NO 2 (Note: Refer to section 4.3 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58)

Table 4. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for NO 2 . CBSA 2010 Census Population 2009 Max AADT Counts # of Required Near-road Monitors # of Active Near-road Monitors # of Additional Near-road Monitors Needed # of Required Area-wide Monitors # of Active Area-wide Monitors # of Additional Area-wide Monitors Needed Flagstaff 134,421 40,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 Prescott 211,033 38,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yuma 195,751 37,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lake Havasu – Kingman 200,186 34,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: None Monitors required for PAMS: JLG Supersite EPA Regional Administrator-required monito rs per 40 CFR 58, App. D 4.3.4: None

_________________________________________________________________________
SO 2 (Note: Refer to section 4.4 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58)

Table 5. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for SO 2 . CBSA County 2010 Census Population 2008 Total SO 2 1 [tons/year] Population Weighted Emissions Index 2 [million persons-tons per year] # of Required Monitors # of Active Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 539 70 0 0 0 Prescott Yavapai 211,033 2272 490 0 0 0 Yuma Yuma 195,751 185 36 0 0 0 Lake Havasu – Kingman Mohave 200,186 319 62 0 0 0

1 Using NEI data
2 Calculated by multiplying CBSA population and total SO 2 and dividing product by one million

Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Hayden Old Jail and Miami Ridgeline. EPA Regional Administrator-required monito rs per 40 CFR 58, App. D 4.4.3: None

_________________________________________________________________________
CO (Note: Refer to section 4.2 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58)

Table 6. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for CO. CBSA 2010 Census Population # of Required Near-Road Monitors # of Active Near-Road Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed

Flagstaff 134,421 0 0 0

Prescott 211,033 0 0 0

Yuma 195,751 0 0 0 Lake Havasu – Kingman 200,186 0 0 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: JLG Supersite EPA Regional Administrator-required monito rs per 40 CFR 58, App.D 4.2.2: None

_____________________________________________________________________________

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 182State of Arizona Air Monitoring Netw ork Plan for the Year 2012, Page 183 Pb (Note: Refer to section 4.5 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58)

Table 7a. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for Pb at NCore. NCore Site CBSA 2010 Census Population # of Required Monitors # of Active Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed

JLG Supersite Phoenix–Mesa–Scottsdale 4,192,887 1 1 0

Table 7b. Source-Oriented Pb Monitoring (including airports)

Source Name Address Pb Emissions (tons per

year) Emission Inventory Source & Data Year Max 3-Month Design Value* [ μ g/m 3 ] Design Value Date (third month, year) # of Required Monitors # of Active Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed

ASARCO LLC -- 3.85 ADEQ 2010 0.27 June, 2011 1 1 0
Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc. -- 3.67 ADEQ 2010 0.06 May, 2011 1 1 0

*consider data from the past 3 years.

Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: None EPA Regional Administrator-required monito rs per 40 CFR 58, App. D 4.5(c): None