alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[House Report 107-50]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                     107-50

======================================================================

 
PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 503, THE UNBORN VICTIMS OF VIOLENCE 
                              ACT OF 2001

                                _______
                                

   April 24, 2001.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 119]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 119, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                Summary of Provisions of the Resolution

    The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 503, the 
Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2001, under a modified closed 
rule. The rule provides two hours of debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on the Judiciary.
    The rule provides that the amendment printed in this report 
shall be considered as adopted. The rule also makes in order 
the amendment printed in the Congressional Record and numbered 
1, if offered by Representative Lofgren of California or her 
designee, which shall be considered as read and shall be 
separately debatable for one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the proponent and an opponent. Finally, the rule 
provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

           Summary of Amendments Made in Order Under the Rule

    Amendment to be Considered as Adopted--Makes a technical 
change to the title of the new section in the Uniform Code of 
Military Justice.
    Lofgren/Conyers--Amendment in the nature of a substitute 
printed in the Congressional Record. Establishes a new federal 
crime for any violent or assaultive conduct against a pregnant 
woman that interrupts or terminates her pregnancy and makes any 
interruption punishable by a fine and imprisonment up to twenty 
years but, if the pregnancy is terminated, punishable by a fine 
and imprisonment up to life.

             Text of Amendment to be Considered as Adopted

    Page 5, strike line 9 and insert the following:

``Sec. 919a. Art. 119a. Causing death of or bodily injury to unborn 
                    children

    Page 7, strike the matter after line 11 and insert the 
following:

``919a. Art. 119a. Causing death of or bodily injury to unborn 
          children.''.

                                

```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 18 (Tuesday, January 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4045-4046]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2017]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RM95-4-000]


Revisions to Uniform System of Accounts, Forms, Statements, and 
Reporting Requirements for Natural Gas Companies; Correction to 
Attachments to Notice of Revised Electronic Filing Specifications for 
FERC Form Nos. 2 and 2A

January 23, 1997.
    The following corrections should be made to the attachments to the 
notice issued October 31, 1996 in this proceeding (61 FR 57410, 
November 6, 1996).
    In the Instruction Manual for Electronic Filing of the Form Nos. 2 
and 2A, in Schedule F5, Record Type 42, the maximum length for the 
item, Reconciling Type, must be changed from 11 to 1. In Schedule F5, 
Record Type 22, the paper copy reference for item 405b, Investment 
Status, must be changed from 213-1. . .-b to 222-1. . .-b. In Schedule 
F5, Record Type 33.2, Long-Term Debt Data, insert a data item between 
the items, Line Number and the Class and Series of Obligation. The 
inserted item will be Information Reported Code. The maximum length is

[[Page 4046]]

1. The data type is numeric. The comments section reads, ``individual 
item, code = 1, total, code = 2.''
    In the instructions for filing Form No. 2A on paper, ``FERC Form 
No. 2-A: Annual Report of Major Natural Gas Companies,'' the title is 
revised to read ``FERC Form No. 2-A: Annual Report of Nonmajor Natural 
Gas Companies.'' In the section entitled ``General Information,'' Item 
IV, When to Submit, is revised to read, ``Submit this report form on or 
before March 31st of the year following the year covered by this 
report.'' The List of Schedules is revised at line 12 to read Capital 
Stock and Long-Term Debt Data. Instruction No. 2 on page 114, Statement 
of Income for the Year, is revised to read, ``Report amounts in account 
414, Other Utility Operating Income, in the same manner as accounts 412 
and 413 above.''
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2017 Filed 1-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 48247.

#### Protests 5459-K, etc., of Lien Import Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218) the protests were sustained as to the hemp hats in question.
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications NOAA-NMFS-F/NWC-201: Status Review for Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon 
Figure 5. Mean monthly water temperatures over a 2-year period for the Snake River (Weiser, Idaho) and at Rock Island Dam on the upper Columbia River (from Utter et al. 1982). 

Use your browser's BACK button to return to the text.

Table of Contents
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 18 (Tuesday, January 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2037]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, and 42 U.S.C. 
9622(d)(2), notice is hereby given that on January 13, 1997, a Consent 
Decree was lodged in United States v. Chrysler Corporation et al., 
Civil Action Nos. 88-341-LON and 88-534-LON (Consolidated) with the 
United States District Court for the District of Delaware.
    This Consent Decree settles claims brought under Section 107 of the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act 
of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 9607, with respect to the Harvey & 
Knotts Superfund Site (the ``Site'') located in New Castle County, 
Delaware, against Chrysler Corporation, Knotts, Inc., and Edna Knotts. 
Pursuant to the terms of the Consent Decree, Chrysler Corporation will 
reimburse the Superfund for response costs incurred by the United 
States in the amount of $1,550,000, and reimburse the State of Delaware 
for response costs in the amount of $44,900; Knotts, Inc. will 
reimburse the Superfund for response costs incurred by the United 
States in the amount of $100,000, and Edna Knotts will provide certain 
easements and restrictive covenants in connection with the Site.
    The Department of Justice will receive comments relating to the 
proposed Consent Decree for a period of thirty days from the date of 
publication of this notice. Comments should be addressed to the 
Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to United 
States v. Chrysler Corporation, et al., Civil Action Nos. 88-341-LON 
and 88-534-LON (Consolidated), Ref. No. 90-11-2-34B. The proposed 
Consent Decree may be examined at the office of the United States 
Attorney, District of Delaware, Chemical Bank Plaza, 1201 Market 
Street, Suite 100, Wilmington, Delaware 19899. Copies of the Consent 
Decree may also be examined and obtained by mail at the Consent Decree 
Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005 (202-624-
0892) and the offices of the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 
III, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107. When 
requesting a copy by mail, please enclose a check in the amount of 
$11.00 (twenty-five cents per page reproduction costs) payable to the 
``Consent Decree Library.''
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-2037 Filed 1-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
EX-10.7



 





Exhibit 10.7




NEPHROS, INC.




AMENDMENT NO. 2

TO

NEPHROS, INC. 2004 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN



Pursuant to Section 9.1 of the Nephros, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), and in
accordance with the resolutions of the Board of Directors of Nephros, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted
as of April 19, 2007 and approved by the Company’s stockholders on May 22, 2007, Section 4.2(a) of
the Plan is hereby amended and restated as follows:




	 	“(a)	 	Aggregate Plan Limit. The total number of Shares with
respect to which Awards may be granted is 1,300,000 Shares. Such amount may be
adjusted under paragraph (e) below. To the extent that a SAR or Phantom Stock
Unit does not provide for the issuance of Shares, there is no limit on the
number of shares with respect to which such SARs or Phantom Stock Units may be
granted.”
Exhibit 99.1
                                                     Press Release dated 8-24-07

                     First Litchfield Financial Corporation
                 13 North Street, Litchfield, Connecticut 06759


NEWS RELEASE
For Immediate Release



          First Litchfield Financial Corporation Declares Cash Dividend

Litchfield,  Connecticut--August  24,  2007--On  August 23,  2007,  the Board of
Directors of First Litchfield Financial  Corporation (OTCBB:  FLFL), the holding
company for The First  National Bank of  Litchfield,  declared a quarterly  cash
dividend  of $0.15 per share  payable on October  23,  2007 to  shareholders  of
record on September 6, 2007.

Statements  contained in this news release  contain  forward-looking  statements
within the  meaning of the  Private  Securities  Litigation  Reform Act of 1995.
These statements are based on the beliefs and expectations of management as well
as the  assumption  made using  information  currently  available to management.
Since these statements reflect the views of management concerning future events,
these statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions,  including, among
others:  changes in market  interest  rates and  general and  regional  economic
conditions; changes in government regulations; changes in accounting principles;
and the quality or composition  of the loan and investment  portfolios and other
factors that may be described in the  Company's  quarterly  reports on Form 10-Q
and its annual report on Form 10-K,  each filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission,  which are  available at the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission's
internet website (www.sec.gov) and to which reference is hereby made. Therefore,
actual future  results may differ  significantly  from results  discussed in the
forward-looking statements.

One of the oldest nationally  chartered banks in the country, The First National
Bank of Litchfield has served the communities of Northwestern  Connecticut since
1814. It is currently  operates  nine  full-service  banking  offices in Canton,
Goshen,   Litchfield,   Marble  Dale,  New  Milford,  Roxbury,   Washington  and
Torrington.  Maintaining a long-standing commitment to personalized service, the
Bank provides consumer,  commercial and retail investment and insurance products
and  services,  as  well as  equipment  leasing  through  its  subsidiary  First
Litchfield  Leasing  Corporation.  The  Bank's  full-service  Trust  and  Wealth
Management  division offers asset management and estate  settlement  services to
individuals,  non-profit and commercial customers. Additionally, the Bank offers
non-deposit  retail  investment  products  such as mutual  funds,  annuities and
insurance through its relationship with Infinex Investments, Inc.

Contact:   Carroll A. Pereira, CFO, (860) 567-2672

                                       ###

                                      -3-
# C_2013207EN.01001101.xml

| 20.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/11

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 19 April 2013 — František Ryneš v Úřad pro ochranu osobních údajů

(Case C-212/13)

2013/C 207/19

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Referring court

Nejvyšší správní soud

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: František Ryneš

Applicant:

Defendant: Úřad pro ochranu osobních údajů

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Can the operation of a camera system installed on a family home for the purposes of the protection of the property, health and life of the owners of the home be classified as the processing of personal data ‘by a natural person in the course of a purely personal or household activity’ within the meaning of Article 3(2) of Directive 95/46/EC, (1) even though such a system monitors also a public space?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1995 L 281, p. 31.

1

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

The Board of Directors
Sunrise Medical Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 
33-44082 on Form S-4, Statement No. 33-81316 on Form S-4, Statement No. 
33-49500 on Form S-3, Statement No. 33-88216 on Form S-8, Statement No. 33-82842
on Form S-8, Statement No. 33-39887 on Form S-8, Statement No. 33-35797 on Form
S-8 and Statement No. 33-13460 on Form S-8 of Sunrise Medical Inc. of our report
dated August 23, 1994, except as to Notes 2 and 11 to the consolidated financial
statements which are as of January 4, 1996 and February 26, 1996, respectively,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Sunrise Medical Inc. and
subsidiaries as of July 1, 1994 and July 2, 1993, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows and the related
financial statement schedules for each of the years in the three-year period
ended July 1, 1994, which report appears in the July 1, 1994, annual report on
Form 10-K/A of Sunrise Medical Inc. Our report refers to the restatement of the
consolidated financial statements of Sunrise Medical Inc. as of July 1, 1994,
and for the year then ended.


Los Angeles, California
February 20, 1996
Before the Third Division,

November 1, 1943

No. 48935.

#### Protests 846031-G, etc., of Chong Kee Jan & Co. et al. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel bak hop, lotus nuts (hoi shin lien, hoi pak lin), sui sit, wai san (stick), sar sum (uncut), lo hon qua, yuen yuk, and mok qua were held entitled to free entry as claimed following *Oy Wo Tong Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372), and wai san (sliced), yuk chuk, and sar sum (cut) were held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 34, Tariff Act of 1930 or Tariff Act of 1922, as claimed, following said C. D. 372.
No. 92-8331.

#### Haynes *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
First Amendment to the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10(d) 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
 WENDY’S INTERNATIONAL, INC. 
 2007 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 WHEREAS,
Wendy’s International, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the Wendy’s International, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan effective immediately. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Company amends the Plan as follows:

 1. Section 5.2(v) of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 
 5.2 (v) Effect of Change in Control. 
 (A) In the event of a Change in Control for an
event described in Section 29.6(C) which also constitutes a change in ownership or effective control of the Company or a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of its assets, in each case within the meaning of Code Section 409A,
the Formula Restricted Stock Units (including those credited pursuant to Section 5.2(ii) in connection with Dividend Equivalent Rights) shall become fully vested as of the date of such Change in Control. 
 (B) In the event that a Grantee’s service as a director terminates within a period commencing on the date of a Change in Control for
an event described in Section 29.6(A) or (B) which also constitutes a change in ownership or effective control of the Company or a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of its assets, in each case within the meaning of Code
Section 409A, and ending on the earlier of the Vesting Date and the second anniversary of such Change in Control, provided that such termination occurred in connection with or as a result of such Change in Control, the Formula Restricted Stock
Units (including those credited pursuant to Section 5.2(ii) in connection with Dividend Equivalent Rights) shall become fully vested as of the date of such termination. 
 (C) In the event that a Grantee’s service as a director terminates prior to the Vesting Date, other than as described in Sections
5.2(A) or (B) and provided that such termination occurred in connection with or as a result of such Change in Control, the Formula Restricted Stock Units (including those credited pursuant to Section 5.2(ii) in connection with Dividend
Equivalent Rights) shall become fully vested as of the date of such termination but shall not be settled until the applicable Vesting Date.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         298,931
<SECURITIES>                                    34,190
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,941,559
<DEPRECIATION>                                 162,970
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,654,038
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,763,424
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,421
<OTHER-SE>                                     548,465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,654,038
<SALES>                                        335,630
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               398,723
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,294
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,684
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             102,083
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 97,051
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,631
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             66,420
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63,415
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.18
        

</TABLE>
No. 47683.

#### Petition 6290-R of F. W. Myers *&*Co., Inc. (Ogdensburg).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

The merchandise consists of a certain hormone, preparation known as “gonadotropic factor” imported from Canada. It appeared from the record that the difference between, the appraised value and .the. entered value was due to certain discounts. From the record presented the court was satisfied that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of .the United States, or to conceal or misrepresent the facts. The petition was therefore granted.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PATRICK HOUSER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D14-1551

[April 8, 2015]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Matthew I. Destry, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

13002950CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Amy Lora Rabinowitz, 

Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Catherine Linton, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 648 So. 2d 263, 263 (Fla. 5th DCA 

1994) (“Where the mistake or misunderstanding in entering a plea is 

attributable to the defendant, it is not error for the court to refuse to allow 

withdrawal of it.”) (citation omitted).

GERBER, LEVINE and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7878
ERNEST L. BYRD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. D. NETHERLAND; C. N. LEWIS; A. G. LEA, Sargeant; DOROTHY CAMPBELL, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at A lexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-96-191-AM) Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 22, 1997 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ernest L. Byrd, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ernest L. Byrd appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Byrd v. Netherland , No. CA-96-191-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED