alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016048EN.01004102.xml

| 8.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2015 — Einhell Germany and Others v Commission

(Case T-73/12) (1)

1

((Dumping - Imports of certain compressors originating in China - Partial refusal to refund the anti-dumping duties paid - Determination of the export price - Deduction of anti-dumping duties - Adjustment of the temporal effects of an annulment))

(2016/C 048/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Einhell Germany AG (Landau an der Isar, Germany); Hans Einhell Nederlands BV (Breda, Netherlands); Einhell France SAS (Villepinte, France); Hans Einhell Österreich GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: R. MacLean, Solicitor, and A. Bochon, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Stobiecka-Kuik, K. Talabér-Ritz and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for the partial annulment of Commission Decisions K(2011) 8831 final, C(2011) 8825 final, C(2011) 8828 final and K(2011) 8810 final of 6 December 2011 concerning applications for a refund of anti-dumping duties paid on imports of certain compressors originating in the People’s Republic of China, and, in the event that the General Court should annul the contested decisions, for the maintenance in force of the effects of those decisions until the Commission has adopted the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of the General Court in this case.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Article 1 of Commission Decisions K(2011) 8831 final, C(2011) 8825 final, C(2011) 8828 final and K(2011) 8810 final of 6 December 2011 concerning applications for a refund of anti-dumping duties paid on imports of certain compressors originating in the People’s Republic of China in so far as that article does not grant Einhell Germany AG, Hans Einhell Nederlands BV, Einhell France SAS and Hans Einhell Österreich GmbH a refund of the anti-dumping duties unduly paid beyond the amounts referred to therein; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 1 of Commission Decisions K(2011) 8831 final, C(2011) 8825 final, C(2011) 8828 final and K(2011) 8810 final of 6 December 2011 concerning applications for a refund of anti-dumping duties paid on imports of certain compressors originating in the People’s Republic of China in so far as that article does not grant Einhell Germany AG, Hans Einhell Nederlands BV, Einhell France SAS and Hans Einhell Österreich GmbH a refund of the anti-dumping duties unduly paid beyond the amounts referred to therein;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 109, 14.4.2012.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2214 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2214

 To remove restrictions from a parcel of land situated in the Atlantic 
                  District, Accomack County, Virginia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 20, 2012

 Mr. Warner (for himself and Mr. Webb) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To remove restrictions from a parcel of land situated in the Atlantic 
                  District, Accomack County, Virginia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTIONS.

    (a) Removal.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall execute such 
instruments as may be necessary to remove all deed restrictions 
described in subsection (b) relating to the parcel of land described in 
subsection (c).
    (b) Deed Restrictions.--The deed restrictions referred to in 
subsection (a) are those restrictions, including easements, exceptions, 
reservations, terms, conditions, and covenants described in Quitclaim 
Deed No. 17808A from the United States to Accomack County, Virginia, 
executed on December 20, 1976, and recorded among the real estate 
records of Accomack County, Virginia, by the Clerk of the Circuit 
Court, on pages 292 through 296 of Deed Book 381.
    (c) Description of Land.--The parcel of land referred to in 
subsection (a) consists of approximately 31.6 acres situated in the 
Atlantic District, Accomack County, Virginia, more particularly 
described in the metes and bounds description recorded on page 292 of 
the quitclaim deed described in subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```
#### BOROUGH OF DOWNINGTOWN v. Thomas J. WAGNER, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued Oct. 21, 1998.

Decided Nov. 9, 1998.

*743
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Order affirmed.

FLAHERTY, C. J., and ZAPPALA, J., dissent.
**Exhibit      32.2**

**Certification      of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley      Act of 2002**

**(i)**
**(ii)**

|                              |   | **WESTSTAR                FINANCIAL SERVICES**              |
|-----------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |   | **CORPORATION**                                             |
|                              |   |                                                        |
|                              |   |                                                        |
| Date:                May 11, 2007 | By:    | /s/Randall                C. Hall                           |
|                              |   |                                                        |
|                              |   | Randall                C. Hall                              |
|                              |   | Executive                Vice President and Chief Financial |
|                              |   | and                Principal Accounting Officer             |
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2332 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain power electronic boxes and static 

converter composite units. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 23, 2012 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain power electronic 

boxes and static converter composite units. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN POWER ELECTRONIC BOXES AND 

4 STATIC CONVERTER COMPOSITE UNITS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2332 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Power electronics box and 

static converter composite 

units (provided for in subheading 8504.40.95), each 

capable of performing the 

functions of an AC inverter 

and an auxiliary power module, capable of reducing DC 

voltage from 42 V (supplied 

by battery) to 12 V output 

and providing three-phase AC 

output to motor generator 

unit, the foregoing certified 

by the importer for use in hybrid electric motor vehicles ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-Q/A
 (Amendment No. 1)
 þ
    
    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
 OR
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from  to
 Commission File No. 1-31900
 AMERICAN OIL & GAS, INC.
  Nevada
    
    88-0451554(State or jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)1050 17th Street, Suite 2400, Denver, CO
    
    80265(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (303) 991-0173
 þ o
 o o
  Large accelerated filer o
    
    Accelerated filer þ
    
    Non-accelerated filer o*
    
    Smaller reporting company o(*Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 o þ




---



##### 



EXPLANATORY NOTE
  Part II, Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
  Shares VotedNominee
    
    For
    
    
    Against
    
    
    Abstain
    
    
    TotalPatrick D. OBrien
    
    
    35,961,589
    
    
    
    1,552,294
    
    
    
    94,381
    
    
    
    37,608,264Andrew P. Calerich
    
    
    35,842,465
    
    
    
    1,685,373
    
    
    
    80,426
    
    
    
    37,608,264C. Scott Hobbs
    
    
    32,957,164
    
    
    
    4,567,111
    
    
    
    83,989
    
    
    
    37,608,264Nick DeMare
    
    
    32,251,498
    
    
    
    5,244,212
    
    
    
    112,554
    
    
    
    37,608,264Jon R. Whitney
    
    
    32,772,874
    
    
    
    4,722,836
    
    
    
    112,554
    
    
    
    37,608,264
   Item 6. EXHIBITS
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description3(iv)
    
    Bylaws of the Company (as revised on June 12, 2009).
(Incorporated by reference from the Companys Current Report
on Form 8-K, filed on June 18, 2009.)31.1
    
    302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer31.2
    
    302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer32.1
    
    906 Certification of Chief
Executive Officer (furnished as Exhibit 32.1 to Original 10-Q)32.2
    
    906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer (furnished as Exhibit 32.2 to Original 10-Q)
 
 SIGNATURES
  Signatures
    
    Title
    
    Date/s/ Pat OBrien

Patrick D. OBrien
    
    Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of The Board of Directors
(principal executive officer)
    
    November 16, 2009/s/ Joseph B. Feiten

Joseph B. Feiten
    
    Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)
    
    November 16, 2009
  2
-rPARTMENTOF 

SERVED NOVEMBER 5, 2010 • ': ' H OPERATIONS 

2 ^ m -8 A 10:U2 

u s DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

PETER SIMONS 

FAA DOCKET No. CP10NM0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA 2010-0534 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The Complaint of Complainant Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter 

"Complainant") was filed on May 21, 2010. Respondent Peter Simons (hereinafter 

"Respondent") on May 12, 2010 had filed a Request for Hearing. 

On November 3, 2010, Respondent, by facsimile motion dated October 22, 2010, 

withdrew its Request for Hearing and requested termination of the proceeding, citing 

settlement. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency 

attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing 

without the consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney 

withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the 

answer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the proceedings under this 

subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal of Request for Hearing having been 

read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Respondent's Withdrawal of Request for Hearing be and is hereby 

granted; and 
2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

C , (^f^odJ^-^^ ^ 

lichau-d C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP10NM0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Peter Z. Simons, Respondent 

2216 N. Farragut Avenue 

Colorado Springs, CO 80907 

Scott R. Morris, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL:^ 425-227-2007 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Groimd Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2136 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2136

To increase the maximum amount of leverage permitted under title III of 
   the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 28, 2012

Ms. Landrieu (for herself and Ms. Snowe) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business 
                          and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To increase the maximum amount of leverage permitted under title III of 
   the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAXIMUM LEVERAGE UNDER TITLE III OF THE SMALL BUSINESS 
              INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958.

    (a) Authorization.--For fiscal year 2013, the Administrator may 
make $4,000,000,000 in guarantees of debentures for programs under 
title III of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 681 
et seq.).
    (b) Family of Funds.--Section 303(b)(2)(B) of the Small Business 
Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 683(b)(2)(B)) is amended by striking 
``$225,000,000'' and inserting ``$350,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2378 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2378

    To suspend temporarily the duty on vacuum-grade ferroniobium or 
                            ferrocolombium.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

Mr. Rockefeller introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on vacuum-grade ferroniobium or 
                            ferrocolombium.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VACUUM-GRADE FERRONIOBIUM OR FERROCOLOMBIUM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Ferroniobium        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        containing by                                                      31/2015.......
                        weight less than
                        0.02 percent of
                        phosphorus or
                        sulfur or less
                        than 0.4 percent
                        of silicon
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        7202.93.40)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Western Bancorp.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Western Bancorp's registration 
statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-53635) and in the registration statements on 
Form S-8 (No. 333-28633, No. 333-44609, No. 333-70441, No. 333-70497, No. 
333-70495) of our report dated February 3, 1999, relating to the consolidated 
balance sheets of Western Bancorp as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the 
related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in 
shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year 
period ended December 31, 1998, which report appears in the December 31, 1998, 
annual report on Form 10-K of Western Bancorp.

Our report, dated February 3, 1999, contains explanatory paragraphs 
indicating that we did not audit the 1996 consolidated financial statements 
of either California Commercial Bankshares or SC Bancorp, we did not audit 
either the 1996 or 1997 financial statements of Bank of Los Angeles, and we 
did not audit either the 1996, 1997, or 1998 financial statements of PNB 
Financial Group. These entities were acquired by Western Bancorp in 
poolings-of-interests transactions in 1997 and 1998. Their financial 
statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to 
us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for those 
entities in the consolidated financial statements of Western Bancorp, is 
based on the reports of the other auditors.



                                       /s/ KPMG LLP



Los Angeles, California
March 26, 1999
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20282]



[[Page 41347]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration
[A-421-805]


Aramid Fiber Formed of Poly Para-Phenylene Terephthalamide From 
the Netherlands; Final Results of Antidumping Administrative Review; 
Correction

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; Aramid Fiber Formed of Poly Para-Phenylene Terephthalamide from 
the Netherlands; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORRECTION: On July 16, 1997, the Department published in the Federal 
Register the final results of administrative review in connection with 
Aramid Fiber Formed of Poly Para-Phenylene Terephthalamide from the 
Netherlands, covering the period June 1, 1995, through May 31, 1996. 
(62 FR 38,058) The Department inadvertently omitted the word ``not'' in 
the second sentence of the ``Department's Position'' with respect to 
Comment 6. Pursuant to 19 CFR 353.28 (d) of the Department's 
regulations, we correct this sentence to read: ``As explained at length 
in the final results of the first administrative review, the Department 
determined not to accept Akzo's accounting method for the amortization 
of goodwill expense as reasonable''.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 1, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nithya Nagarajan at (202) 482-0193, 
Eugenia Chu at (202) 482-3964, or Ellen Knebel at (202) 482-0409, 
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20230.

Robert S. LaRussa,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
    Dated: July 22, 1997.
[FR Doc. 97-20282 Filed 7-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### Montgomery Ward & Co. *v.*United States

No. 5977.

Invoice dated Lauscha, Germany] July 6, 1939.

Certified July 13, 1939.

Entered at Houston, Tex., August 26, 1939.

Entry No. 246-H.

(Decided January 24, 1944)

*Wallace & Schwartz (Barnes, Richardson & Colburn,*by *Joseph Schwartz*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement involves the proper dutiable value of certain Chirstmas tree ornaments exported from Germany and imported at the port of Houston, Tex.

The case has been submitted for decision on a stipulation entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties, wherein it is agreed, in substance, as follows:

(1) That the Christmas tree ornaments in question were exported from Germany during the month of July 1939.

(2) That the instant merchandise is similar in all material respects to that which was the subject of the decision in the case of *F. W. Woolworth Co. et al.*v. *United States*(Reap. Dec. 5094).

(3) That the market conditions existing during the period of exportation of the articles in question were similar, if not identical, to the conditions found to be prevailing in the foreign market as described in the *Woolworth Co.*case, *supra.*

(4) That the extra charge of *2%*per centum appearing on the invoice herein is the usual 2K per centum inside packing charge applying to this line of merchandise.

(5) That the record in the *Woolworth Co.*case, *sufra,*may be incorporated in and made a part of the record in the present case.

*373On the agreed facts, as hereinabove set forth, I find that on the dates of exportation of the instant merchandise Christmas tree ornaments, such as and similar to those involved herein, were freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country of exportation, to wit, the Sonneberg-Lauscha district of Germany, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for consumption in Germany and for exportation to the United States and other countries.

Accordingly, I hold as matter of law that the proper dutiable foreign and export values of the Christmas tree ornaments exported subsequent to January 1, 1938, are the *per se*unit invoice prices, plus 3K per centum social assessments, plus 2% per centum inside packing, plus, when not included in such *per se*unit invoice prices, all other costs of cases and packing-and the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, as invoiced, whenever reported as dutiable by the appraiser.

The- appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeal is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.-
# C_2016371EN.01003401.xml

| 10.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/34

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 29 August 2016 — Roest v Commission

(Case F-85/12) (1)

1

(2016/C 371/40)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 295, 29/9/2012, p. 35.

1

---