alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012295EN.01002701.xml

| 29.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/27

---

Action brought on 19 July 2012 — Hut.com v OHIM — Intersport France (THE HUT)

(Case T-330/12)

2012/C 295/48

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: The Hut.com Ltd (Northwich, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Intersport France (Longjumeau, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 April 2012 in case R 814/2011-2; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 April 2012 in case R 814/2011-2; and

| — | Order the defendant and the other party before the Board of Appeal to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant and the other party before the Board of Appeal to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘THE HUT’, for inter alias services in class 35 — Community trade mark application No 8394091

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: French trade mark registration No 33228708 of the word mark ‘LA HUTTE’, for goods in classes 3, 5, 18, 22, 25 and 28

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partially annulled the contested decision

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
#### Anne Kohn LEYENS v. Louis E. LEYENS.

No. 49205.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 9, 1977.

Rehearing Denied April 20, 1977.

Young, Scanlon & Sessums, Robert R. Marshall, Jackson, for appellant.

Ramsey, Bodron, Thames & Robinson, Lee Davis Thames, Vicksburg, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Warren County; Ernest Kellner, Chancellor.

Before INZER, P. J., and SUGG and LEE, JJ.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GILLESPIE, C. J., PATTERSON, P. J., and SMITH, ROBERTSON, WALKER and BROOM, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 152 (Thursday, August 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20834]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[OR-85-97-6310-00;GP7-0255]


Closure of Roads in Lane County, Oregon

ACTION: Closure of roads in Lane County, Oregon.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that certain roads in Lane County, 
Oregon, are closed to public vehicular use. The purpose of the closure 
is to reduce vandalism to communications facilities on Prairie Peak. 
BLM employees and other individuals operating within the scope of 
official duties are exempt from this closure.
    The effective date of the closure is August 15, 1997. The closure 
is made under the authority of 43 CFR 8364.1.
    The roads affected by this closure are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Road No.                             Location             
------------------------------------------------------------------------
15-7-7.............................  BLM segment in T. 15 S., R. 7 W.,  
                                      Section 7, W.M., Oregon.          
15-7-7.1...........................  BLM segment in T. 15 S., R. 7 W.,  
                                      Section 7, W.M., Oregon.          
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A locked gate will be installed on Road No. 15-7-7 near it's 
junction with Road No. 15-7-23.
John Bacho,
Marys Peak Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-20834 Filed 8-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 152 (Thursday, August 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20874]



[[Page 42586]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Advisory Council, Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
National Advisory body scheduled to meet during the month of September 
1997.

    Name: National Advisory Council on the National Health Service 
Corps
    Date and Time: September 3-7, 1997 (Times vary).
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20814.
    The meeting is open to the public.
    Agenda: Agenda items include updates on the National Health 
Service Corps program; meetings with community and clinical groups 
on their past experiences with the NHSC and future partnership 
development; academic-community educational linkages; potential 
roles for the NHSC; and meetings of NHSC workgroups on new 
environment strategies, health system linkages, and mission 
coalition building.
    The opening meeting will be held on Wednesday, September 3 from 
6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. On Thursday, Friday, and Saturday, meetings 
will begin at 9:00 a.m. and conclude around 5:00 p.m. Sunday's 
meeting will begin at 8:30 a.m. and adjourn around 11:00 a.m.
    The meeting is open to the public. Anyone requiring information 
regarding the subject Council should contact Ms. Eve Morrow, 
National Advisory Council on the National Health Service Corps, 
Health Resources and Services Administration, 8th floor, 4350 East 
West Highway, Rockville, Maryland 20857, Telephone (301) 594-4144.
    Agenda Items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Dated: August 4, 1997.
James J. Corrigan,
Acting Associate Administrator, Office of Management and Program 
Support.
[FR Doc. 97-20874 Filed 8-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
No. 46556.

#### Protest 42651-K of T. D. Downing Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is amorphous graphite the same as that the subject of *Starkey*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 118, C. D. 444) the protest was sustained.
```

[111th Congress Public Law 143]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 41]]

Public Law 111-143
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To extend the pilot program for volunteer groups to obtain criminal 
     history background checks. <<NOTE: Mar. 1, 2010 -  [S. 2950]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Criminal History 
Background Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2009.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 42 USC 5101 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Criminal History Background Checks 
Pilot Extension Act of 2009''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM.

    Section 108(a)(3)(A) of the PROTECT Act (42 U.S.C. 5119a note) is 
amended by striking ``a 78-month'' and inserting ``a 92-month''.

    Approved March 1, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2950:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            Jan. 25, considered and passed Senate.
            Feb. 2, 4, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### , . Document

Number: 

# i i <£2tf f ll-E-18 0 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:11 AM

Sheet 220 of 264P. 2 08/31/199 8 14:4 1 317867074 0 CENTUR Y MARBL E C O I N PAG E 0 2 

### A 9 4 5 2 11?£"-,/S O
From : Date : Contact : Company : Contac tRepor t Rober t Jemison , Pacific Environmenta l Services , Inc . (PES ) Augus t 1 7 & 18,199 8 Mr . Ronald Maure

r Centur y Marble , Inc . Telephon e Number : (317)867-555 5 Fa x Number : (317 ) 867-074 0 ContactSummary : Mr . Ronal d Maure r was contacte

d o n behal f o f th e U.S . EP A t o updat e informatio n provide d in the 199 3 EP

A Reinforced Plasti c Composite s Screening Surve y submitte d by Centur

y Marble , Inc . fo r thei r facilit y locate d i

n Indianapolis , Indiana . I

n respons e to m

y question s Mr . Maure

r indicate d th e following : Th e facilit y use s polyme

r casting an

d atomize d spra

y lay-u p (gel coat s only ) t o produc e culture d marbl e vanities , bat h tubs , an d showe r units . A clea r gel coa t i s used fo r th e overwhelming majorit

y (>95% ) o f

the facility' s products . Occasionally , fo

r specia l custo morders , th

e facilit y wil l us e atranslucen

t bas e gel coa

t wit h adde d pigments , t o produc e aproduct wit h th e colo r specifie d by th e customer . The facilit

y use s ver y smal l quantitie s o f

toolin g ge l coats . Th

e facilit y applie s thes e toolin g ge

l coat s usin g han d lay-up . Th e facilit y use s atomized spra

y lay-u p to appl y th e clea r productio n ge

l coa t in the fabricatio n of

the facility' s products . Th

e clea r ge l coa t currentl y use d b y th e facilit y i s manufactured b y H K Research Corporatio

n an d contain s 45.0 % - 47.0 % HA P b y weigh t (45.0 % - 47.0 % styrene , 0.0 % methy l methacrylate) . Th e product numbe r fo r the clea r ge l coa t i s G l 175 . N o additiona

l HA P (styren e o

r methy l methacrylate) i s adde

d t o th e clea r ge l coa t durin g o r prior t o the fabrication proces s wit

h the exception o

f smal l amount s o f HA P tha t ma y (o r ma y not ) b e present

i n initiators , promoter s and/or

catalyst s adde

d t o the ge l coats .

INFORMATIO N I S ACCURA T 

# L g^/L ,

0 * &P. 3 08/31/199 8 14:4 1 3178B7074 0 CENTUR Y MARBL E C O I N PAG E 0 1 f

CENTUR Y Marbl e CENTUR A Soli d Surfacin g
Luxuriou s Bat h ftKitche

n Showroo m

To : Attn : 

# ukr*+ <\ PmiaQt U Fro m 

# pa« « ^iq-qui-ftaa ^ You are receiving

the following: 

# :Jt W Rawe r

Date : ft- 3\ - 9 ?

Tota l numbe ro f page s includin g cover : 

# • 2 -

ff this memo did not go through

correctly, please

call at 3*7-567-555 5

%
No. 45371.

#### Protest 5939-K of Butler Bros. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Butler*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303) the Rockingham ware in question was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 149 (Monday, August 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20482]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision
[AC-22; OTS No. 2173]

Spring Hill Savings Bank, F.S.B., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 
Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on July 28, 1997, the Director, 
Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, or her designee, 
acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the application of 
Spring Hill Savings Bank, F.S.B., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, to convert 
to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application are 
available for inspection at the Dissemination Branch, Office of Thrift 
Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, and the 
Northeast Regional Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 10 Exchange 
Place, 18th Floor, Jersey City, New Jersey 07302.

    Dated: July 30, 1997.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20482 Filed 8-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
```
#### Mutual Trading Co. *v.*United States

No. 6237.

Invoice dated Kobe, Japan, September 24, 1940.

Certified September 24, 1940.

Entered at Los Angeles, Calif., October 16, 1940.

Entry No. 2090.

(Decided November 29, 1945)

*Lawrence & Tuitle (George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for tlie plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rap,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court:

> (1) That as to the merchandise involved herein, represented on the invoice by the items marked *“A”*and initialed GRG by'Examiner G. R. Gulick, the market value or price at the time of exportation, at which such or similar mer*467chandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the invoiced unit prices, packed.

> (2) That at the time of exportation there was no higher foreign value for this merchandise and that the appraisement made under authority of the Presidential proclamation published in T. D. 46168 was not applicable to said merchandise, based upon the decisions in Reap. Dec.’s 4444 and 4570.

> (3) That the appeal is abandoned as to all other merchandise not marked with the letter “A” as stated above and contained on the invoice, and that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise represented on the invoice by the items marked “A” and initialed GRG by Examiner G. R. Guliclc, and that such values are the invoiced unit prices, packed.

The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeal is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Down East Emergency Management Institute

Flight Operations Standard Operating Procedure (SOPs)

Mandatory Operating Conditions

1. ALL Operations to occur in Class G airspace.

2. Operators to avoid congested or populated areas, which are depicted in yellow on 

VFR charts.

3. Operations to be conducted over private or controlled-access property.

4. Permission from land owner/controller required before commencing any flights.

5. Operations to occur during Visual Flight Rules Meteorological Conditions 

(VMC).

6. Aircraft to remain within Visual Line of Sight (VMOS).

7. Geo Fence in Flight Software may be expanded by observer with ability to control 

aircraft.

8. Operations to occur during daylight hours.

9. Above Ground Level (AGL) altitude to be restricted to 999 feet.

10. All operations conducted in vicinity of airport to remain more than 2.5 NM from 

centerline azimuth of runway centerline measured from runway thresholds.

11. All required permissions and permits will be obtained from territorial, state, 

county or city jurisdictions, including local law enforcement, fire, or other 

appropriate governmental agencies.

12. All operations will include one pilot for flight control and one observer for VLOS 

enhanced of surrounding area near the aircraft.

Flight Operating Requirements (PIC) Flight Automation

1. PIC is required to check and verify solid GPS 3d Fix on position.

2. PIC to verify that all sensors are operating this includes sonar, barometric 

pressure and wind speed.

3. PIC is required to verify data-link is operating fully in automated pre-flight 

system performance check.

4. PIC is required to verify “Flight Emergency Mode” is operating of which the 

mode is to be activated via radio and verify audible via ground control 

acknowledges mode switch and that pre programmed altitude is set for 50AGL 

with Circle flight path over home location.

5. Pre-define responses to include behavior such as attempting to re-establish radio 

communications, return to home position, return to home and land, or land in 

current position and release of parachute.

6. Verify in case of Lost GPS, a manual flight mode will be enabled in “Stabilized” 

mode which will allow for safe flight manually to provide manual navigation 

inputs to assist in landing the vehicle.

7. PIC required to perform Pre-flight Safety Checklist before flight.

AgriView Aerial Solutions Form 1001-1A Flight Operations SOPs
No. 46559.

#### Protest 979165-G of W. X. Huber Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the hearing the case was submitted on the official papers including the weigher’s return. From the record the court was unable to find anything to disturb the correctness of the collector’s action. The protest was therefore overruled.