alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2371 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit employers to pay 

higher wages to their employees. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. VITTER, Mr. DEMINT, and Mr. LEE) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit 

employers to pay higher wages to their employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rewarding Achieve5 ment and Incentivizing Successful Employees Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘RAISE Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF HIGHER WAGES. 

8 Section 9(a) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

9 U.S.C. 159(a)) is amended— 

10 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(a)’’; and 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2371 IS

1 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(2) Notwithstanding a labor organization’s exclusive 

3 representation of employees in a unit, or the terms and 

4 conditions of any collective bargaining contract or agree5 ment then in effect, nothing in either— 

6 ‘‘(1) section 8(a)(1) or 8(a)(5), or 

7 ‘‘(2) a collective bargaining contract or agree8 ment renewed or entered into after the date of en9 actment of the RAISE Act, 

10 shall prohibit an employer from paying an employee in the 

11 unit greater wages, pay, or other compensation for, or by 

12 reason of, his or her services as an employee of such em13 ployer, than provided for in such contract or agreement.’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2013063EN.01002601.xml

| 2.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/26

---

Action brought on 19th December 2012 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-155/12)

2013/C 63/51

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Tymen, Lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decision not to add the applicant on the reserve list of the selection procedure EPSO/AD/215/11.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | The annulment of the EPSO decision dated 19 September 2012; |
| --- | --- |

—

The annulment of the EPSO decision dated 19 September 2012;

| — | if necessary the annulment of the EPSO decision dated 28 June 2012; |
| --- | --- |

—

if necessary the annulment of the EPSO decision dated 28 June 2012;

| — | on a subsidiary level, to be compensated for the prejudice suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

on a subsidiary level, to be compensated for the prejudice suffered;

| — | in any event, order the reimbursement of all costs incurred to ensure the applicant’s defence. |
| --- | --- |

—

in any event, order the reimbursement of all costs incurred to ensure the applicant’s defence.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 (the Report), I, Alan L. Wells, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                                                    
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 1, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Alan L. Wells                                                                                  
|                     |  |  |  | Alan L. Wells                                                                                      
|                     |  |  |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2411 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2411

 To suspend temporarily the duty on lightweight digital camera lenses 
                 measuring approximately 55 mm or more.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on lightweight digital camera lenses 
                 measuring approximately 55 mm or more.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIGHTWEIGHT DIGITAL CAMERA LENSES MEASURING APPROXIMATELY 55 
              MM OR MORE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Lenses designed     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        for digital                                                        31/2015.......
                        cameras, the
                        foregoing with a
                        focal length
                        measuring
                        approximately 55
                        mm or more but
                        not over 200 mm
                        and weighing
                        between 329 and
                        339 g (provided
                        for in subheading
                        9002.11.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case No. 5,634.

#### GOUGHRAN v. ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY-SEVEN TONS OF COAL.

[Cited in The Mary E. Taber, Case No. 9,209. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
No. 44424.

#### Protests 19757-K, etc., of Intercontinental Meat Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Stokby*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358) it was held that 10 percent allowance should have been made for the weight of the gelatinous material in question.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 229 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 229

 To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require labeling 
                    of genetically engineered fish.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 31, 2011

  Mr. Begich (for himself, Ms. Murkowski, Mrs. Murray, and Mr. Wyden) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require labeling 
                    of genetically engineered fish.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE FEDERAL FOOD, DRUG, AND COSMETIC ACT 
              REGARDING GENETICALLY ENGINEERED SALMON.

    Section 403 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
343) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(z) If it contains genetically engineered fish unless the food 
bears a label stating that fact.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

                           INTRAOP MEDICAL CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intraop Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald
A. Goer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Donald A. Goer
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                       Donald A. Goer
                                                       Chief Executive Officer

                                                       Date: August 12, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Intraop Medical Corporation and will be retained by Intraop Medical
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.


                                       47
EXHIBIT 99.1

Central Jersey Bancorp to be Listed on The NASDAQ Global Market
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LONG BRANCH, NEW JERSEY, February 1, 2007 (NASDAQ Global Market: CJBK):

Central Jersey Bancorp, the parent company of Central Jersey Bank, N.A., is
pleased to announce that NASDAQ has approved the transfer of the Company's
common stock listing from the NASDAQ Capital Market to the NASDAQ Global Market.
Central Jersey Bancorp's common stock commenced trading on the NASDAQ Global
Market on February 1, 2007.

As a NASDAQ Global Market company, Central Jersey Bancorp will receive enhanced
visibility through inclusion in the NASDAQ Global Market Composite Index, as
well as the stock tables of The Wall Street Journal and many other business and
regional newspapers. According to NASDAQ, the NASDAQ Global Market is reserved
for those companies that have demonstrated, among other things, a commitment to
achieving high standards for their focus on corporate governance.

Central Jersey Bancorp common stock will continue to trade under the symbol
"CJBK."

About the Company

Central Jersey Bancorp is the holding company and sole shareholder of Central
Jersey Bank, N.A., which provides a full range of banking services to both
individual and business customers through fourteen branch facilities located in
Monmouth and Ocean Counties, New Jersey. Central Jersey Bancorp is traded on The
NASDAQ Global Market under the trading symbol "CJBK." Central Jersey Bank, N.A.
can be accessed through the internet at www.CJBNA.com.
                                        -------------

Forward Looking Statements

Statements about the future expectations of Central Jersey Bancorp and its
subsidiary, Central Jersey Bank, N.A., including future revenues and earnings,
and all other statements in this press release other than historical facts are
"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended. Since these statements involve risks and uncertainties and are
subject to change at any time, the companies' actual results could differ
materially from expected results. Among these risks, trends and uncertainties
are the effect of governmental regulation on Central Jersey Bank, N.A., the
availability of working capital, the cost of personnel, and the competitive
market in which Central Jersey Bank, N.A. competes.

Contacts

James S. Vaccaro, President and CEO, 732-571-1300
Robert S. Vuono, Sr. EVP & COO, 732-292-1600
Anthony Giordano, III, EVP and CFO, 732-923-1115
Before the Second Division,

March 1, 1940

No. 43304.

#### Protest 287676-G of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Normandy lace similar to that involved in *United States*v. *Amrein*(26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) was held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.
# C_2013101EN.01001101.xml

| 6.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/11

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia (Italy) lodged on 28 January 2013 — Cartiera dell’Adda SpA and Cartiera di Cologno SpA v CEM Ambiente SpA

(Case C-42/13)

2013/C 101/23

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Cartiera dell’Adda SpA, Cartiera di Cologno SpA

Applicant:

Defendant: CEM Ambiente SpA

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is it contrary to Community law, when an undertaking participating in a tendering procedure has failed to declare, in its request for participation, that its technical director has not been the object of any of the prosecutions and convictions referred to in Article 38(1)(b) and (c) of Legislative Decree No 163/2006, for an interpretation of that article to be given, in accordance with which the awarding entity must order the exclusion of that undertaking even when that undertaking has suitably proved that the use of the term ‘technical director’ in its request was due to a mere clerical error? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is it contrary to Community law, when an undertaking participating in a tendering procedure has failed to declare, in its request for participation, that its technical director has not been the object of any of the prosecutions and convictions referred to in Article 38(1)(b) and (c) of Legislative Decree No 163/2006, for an interpretation of that article to be given, in accordance with which the awarding entity must order the exclusion of that undertaking even when that undertaking has suitably proved that the use of the term ‘technical director’ in its request was due to a mere clerical error?

| 2. | Is it contrary to Community law, when an undertaking participating in a tendering procedure has provided relevant, suitable evidence that the persons required to make the statements referred to in Article 38(1)(b) and (c) have not been the object of any of the prosecutions and convictions referred to therein, for an interpretation of that article to be given, in accordance with which the awarding entity must order the exclusion of that undertaking as a consequence of the failure to comply with the lex specialis under which the tendering procedure was launched? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is it contrary to Community law, when an undertaking participating in a tendering procedure has provided relevant, suitable evidence that the persons required to make the statements referred to in Article 38(1)(b) and (c) have not been the object of any of the prosecutions and convictions referred to therein, for an interpretation of that article to be given, in accordance with which the awarding entity must order the exclusion of that undertaking as a consequence of the failure to comply with the lex specialis under which the tendering procedure was launched?

lex specialis

---
VI 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2220 

For the relief of Momo Krcic. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 21, 2012 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Momo Krcic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MOMO 

4 KRCIC. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Momo Krcic shall be eligible for an 

8 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 

9 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil10 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 

11 section 204 of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for adjustment 

12 of status to lawful permanent resident. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2220 IS

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Momo Krcic enters 

2 the United States before the filing deadline set forth in 

3 subsection (c), Momo Krcic shall be considered to have 

4 entered and remained lawfully in the United States and 

5 shall be eligible for adjustment to lawful permanent resi6 dent status under section 245 of the Immigration and Na7 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of the enact8 ment of this Act. 

9 (c) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub10 sections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the application for 

11 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

12 are filed with appropriate fees not later than 2 years after 

13 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

14 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

15 Upon granting immigrant visas or lawful permanent resi16 dent status to Momo Krcic, the Secretary of State shall 

17 instruct the proper officer to reduce by one, during the 

18 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 

19 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

20 country of birth of Momo Krcic under section 202(a)(2) 

21 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

22 1152(a)(2)). 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Hori Bros. *v.*United States

No. 6940.

Entry No. 8049.

Invoice dated Tokyo, Japan, May 4, 1933.

Certified May 4, 1933.

Entered at Los Angeles, Calif., June 3, 1933.

(Decided March 3, 1947)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> *421It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court:

> (1) That as to the merchandise involved herein, represented on the invoice by the items marked “A” and initialed “GRG” by Examiner G. R. Gulick, the market value or price at the time of exportation, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the invoiced unit prices, packed.

> (2) That at the time of exportation there was no higher foreign value for this merchandise, and that the appraisement made under authority of the Presidential proclamation published in T. D. 46158 was not applicable to said merchandise, based upon the decisions in Reap. Dec.’s 4444 and 4570.

> (3) That the appeal as to all other merchandise not marked with the letter “A” as stated above and contained on the invoice is abandoned, and that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise represented on the invoice by the items marked “A” and initialed “GRG” by Examiner G. R. Gulick, and that such values are the invoiced unit prices, packed.

In all other respects and as to all other merchandise, the appeal having been abandoned, it is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 10.42
                                                                   -------------






29 March 2005





Mr. Nigel P. Hebborn Nestor, Inc.
400 Massasoit Avenue, Suite 200
East Providence, RI  02914


Dear Mr. Hebborn:

Pursuant to Section 3.2 of your  Employment  Agreement  with Nestor,  Inc.  (the
"Company"), the Compensation Committee has set your bonus targets for 2005.

Your  bonus  for  2005  shall  be 1.0% of the  Company's  2005  earnings  before
interest,   taxes,   depreciation  and   amortization,   as  determined  by  the
Compensation Committee;  provided, however, that if the Company's net income for
2005 exceeds  $500,000,  your bonus for 2005 shall be 2.0% of the Company's 2005
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, as determined by
the Compensation Committee.


Very truly yours,

/s/ Robert G. Flanders, Jr.
-------------------------------------------
Robert G. Flanders, Jr.
Chairman, Compensation Committee
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2348 

To suspend temporarily the duty on cyclopentylpropionyl chloride. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on cyclopentylpropionyl 

chloride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CYCLOPENTYLPROPIONYL CHLORIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Cyclopentylpropionyl chloride 

(CAS No. 104–97–2) (provided for in subheading 

2916.20.50) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2348 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32








Certifications


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Investors Title Company, a North Carolina corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(i)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and





(ii)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:   March 9, 2011
/s/ J. Allen FineJ. Allen FineChief Executive OfficerDated:   March 9, 2011
/s/ James A. Fine, Jr.James A. Fine, Jr.Chief Financial Officer