alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OR GE P AR AD A- QU I NT AN I L L A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 71883 A ge nc yN o. A 096- 226- 527 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay25, 2010 ** S an F r an c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Jo rg e P arad a-Q u i n t an i l l a, a n at i v e an dci t i zen o f E l S al v ad o r, p et i t i o n s p ro se f o rr e v ie w o f

th e d e c is io n o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls d is m is s in g h is ap p e a l f r o m th e i mmi g r a t i o n j u d g e ’ s d e n i a l o f h i s ap p l i c a t i o n s f

o ra s y l u m, w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al , and rel i ef un der the C on vent i on A gai nstT orture ( “ C A T ”) .



# FI LED JU N 03 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 71883 2 W e r e je c t p e titio n e r ’s c la im th a t h e is e lig ib le f o ra s y lu m b a s e do n h is m e m be r s hi p i n apart i c ul ars oc i a l gr oup, na m e l y , y oung E l S a l va dor an m a l e s w ho r e s is t e f f o rts b yg an g s to r e c ru it th e m . See San tos-L em us v. Mukasey , 542 F . 3d 7 3 8 , 7 4 5 - 4 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( r e je c tin g a s ap artic u lars o c ia l g r o up ” y o u n g m e n in E l S a lv a d o rr e s is tin g g an g v io le n c e ” ) ; R am os-L op ezv. H older , 563 F . 3d 855, 860- 62 (9th C i r. 20 09 ) ( re

j ec t i ng as a part i cul arsoci algrou p “ youn g H on du ran m en w ho have been rec rui t ed by a [ gang ] , bu tw ho re fuse t o j oi n”). B ec ause pet i t i on er f a i l e d t o de m ons tr a t e he w a s pe r s e c ut e d on a c c ountof apr ot e c t e d gr ound, w e de ny th e p et i t i o n as t o h i s asyl u m an dw i th h o l d i n g o f rem o v al cl ai m s. See B arri os v. H older , 58 1 F . 3d 84 9, 85 6 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). W e a l so re j ec tpet i t i on er ’ s c l ai m that the I Jf a i l e d t o pr ope r l yc ons i de rhi s C A T c l a i m be c aus e the B I A di d c ons i de rthe c l a i m de no vo , an dd e n i e dth e CA T c l a i m. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 149 (Monday, August 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20407]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant To The National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993 Semiconductor Research Corporation

    Notice is hereby given that, on February 5, 1997 and June 11, 1997, 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the 
Semiconductor Research Corporation (``SRC'') filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing changes in membership. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Mentor Graphics Corporations, Wilsonville, 
OR has become a member of SRC; and Numerical Technologies, Inc., 
Sunnyvale, CA has become an Affiliate Member. Additionally, Alcoa, San 
Diego, CA; E-Systems, Inc., Dallas, TX; NORTEL, Ottawa, CANADA; 
Microelectronics & Computer Technology Corporation (MCC), Austin, TX; 
BTA Technology, Inc., Santa Clara, CA; Integrated Electronics 
Innovations, Inc., Cary, NC; and Solid State Systems, Inc., Santa 
Clara, CA are no longer members.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership, corporate 
name, or planned activities of this group research project. Membership 
in the project remains open, and Semiconductor Research Corporation 
intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes 
in membership.
    On January 7, 1985, the Semiconductor Research Corporation filed 
its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on January 30, 1985 (50 FR 4281). 
The last notification was filed with the Department on February 5, 
1997.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-20407 Filed 8-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          97,456
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               138,702
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    201,904
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        880,734
<ALLOWANCE>                                     15,894
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,383,510
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,226,793
<SHORT-TERM>                                    12,751
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             14,311
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       112,947
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,708
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,383,510
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 80,639
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               15,714
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 4,681
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               101,034
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              28,276
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,358
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           71,676
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,800
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 342
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 65,757
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,805
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,162
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,162
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.99
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,488
<LOANS-PAST>                                        31
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 9,453
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 13,482
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                15,757
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,165
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,502
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               15,894
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            15,894
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
No. 42176.

#### Protests 746728-G, etc., of Antolini & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

*Keefe,*J.

In accordance with stipulation of *counsel*and on the authority of *Kraft*v. *United States*(T. D. 47955) the protests were sustained.
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-141049, 333-88918,333-65912, 333-76633, 333-76635,333-75763, 33-56693, 33-69840, 33-31556, and 2-76939 on Form S-8 and in No.333-127677 on Form S-3* *of our reports dated February 29, 2008, relating to the financialstatements and financial statement schedule of Smith International, Inc. (which report expresses anunqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s adoption ofStatement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123r, “Share-Based Payment” as of January1, 2006; SFAS No. 158, “Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other PostretirementPlans” as of December 31, 2006; and Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48,“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” onJanuary 1, 2007) and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of Smith International, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPHouston, Texas
II 

Calendar No. 370 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2366 

To extend student loan interest rates for undergraduate Federal Direct 

Stafford Loans. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. ENZI, Mr. KYL, Mr. 

CORNYN, Mr. WICKER, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. BARRASSO, Mrs. HUTCHISON, 

Mr. BLUNT, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. JOHANNS, Mr. COATS, and Mr. ISAKSON) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and ordered placed on 

the calendar 

A BILL 

To extend student loan interest rates for undergraduate 

Federal Direct Stafford Loans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Interest Rate Reduc5 tion Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2366 PCS

1 SEC. 2. INTEREST RATE EXTENSION. 

2 Subparagraph (D) of section 455(b)(7) of the Higher 

3 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(b)(7)(D)) is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) in the matter preceding clause (i), by strik6 ing ‘‘2012’’ and inserting ‘‘2013’’; and 

7 (2) in clause (v), by striking ‘‘2012’’ and insert8 ing ‘‘2013’’. 

9 SEC. 3. REPEALING PREVENTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH 

10 FUND. 

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4002 of the Patient Pro12 tection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 300u–11) is 

13 repealed. 

14 (b) RESCISSION OF UNOBLIGATED FUNDS.—Of the 

15 funds made available by such section 4002, the unobli16 gated balance is rescinded. 

17 SEC. 4. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTORY PAY-AS-YOU-GO 

18 ACT OF 2010. 

19 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

20 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

21 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

22 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

23 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

24 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro25 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

26 vote on passage. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 370 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2366 

A BILL 

To extend student loan interest rates for 

undergraduate Federal Direct Stafford Loans. 

APRIL 25, 2012 

Read twice and ordered placed on the calendar 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
      32(b)




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Oak Hill Financial, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dale B. Shafer,
      Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




*/s/
      Dale B. Shafer*




Dale
      B.
      Shafer


Interim
      Chief Financial Officer





May
      9,
      2007





-
      24
      -
exv10w2



 






Exhibit
10.2









August 14, 2007




Mr. Chris Felfe

1524 Sylvia Lane

Newport Beach, CA 92660




Dear Chris:



This letter is to supplement your employment agreement of this same date and effective August 10,
2007 (“Employment Agreement”). In regards to your employment pursuant to the Employment Agreement
we hereby agree to pay a sign-on bonus of $100,000 subject to the terms, limitations and potential
forfeiture as described herein. We will pay this bonus in four semi-annual payments of $25,000 as
follows: February 10, 2008; August 10, 2008; February 10, 2009; and August 10, 2009. Should your
employment end for any reason prior any of these payment dates other than a termination by the
Company without cause the unpaid payments will be forfeited and this obligation shall be null and
void. In the event of a termination without cause the payments remaining at that time shall be paid
on the termination date.



This letter shall also affirm the company’s prior agreement in your Offer Letter dated July 14,
2006 to provide a Signing Bonus of $80,000 effective upon your original hire date with remaining
payments due on September 5, 2007, March 5, 2008 and September 5, 2008 of $20,000 each. In all
other respects the Employment Agreement shall supersede the provisions of the Offer Letter.



Your signature on the return copy of this letter will acknowledge your acceptance.



This letter agreement shall supplement but be interpreted under the terms of the Employment
Agreement and shall in no way affect your status as “at will.” Employment with the Company may be
terminated for any reason, with or without cause or notice, and at any time by the employee or the
Company. Nothing in this letter or any oral or written statement shall limit the right to
terminate your employment at-will.



Sincerely,




John King, CFO

Skilled Healthcare, LLC




Acknowledged




	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Chris Felfe

	 	8-14-07
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Signature – Chris Felfe

	 	Date
Need to return call by / at/between and

. Signature: Project No.: 0172 .09.005.412 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: 304m 2012 Annual Review 

### CBI?

Yes

No TELEPHONE CALL RECOR D

Incoming

Outgoing Date: 03/20/2012 Time:

11:45 am

pm

Company Name: Tyson Joslin, IL ERG Staff Name: Elizabeth Sabol

Contact Name: Kim Rastessin Contact Phone Number: 605

- 235

- 4801

General Subject: Nitrate Compound Discharges Reported to TRI in 2009



### TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

Background:

Tyson’s Joslin Nitrate Compounds Loadings :

TRI 2009: 4

, 450

, 000

TRI 2010 (OTIS): 3,289,150

Telecon Notes:

I called and left message s for Ms. Kim Ra st e s sin on Tuesday

, March 20, 2012 and Mo nday, March 26, 2012 at

1:20 PM explaining the purpose for calling. Ms. Rastessin left me a message Monday, March 26 at 2:15 PM

asking me to return her call. I called Ms. Rastessin back on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 at 11:10 am and left a

message.

On March 29, 2010 I was able to reach Ms. Rastessin to discuss the 2009 TRI nitrate compound discharges. Ms.

Rastessin stated that she would look into the discrepancy between the 2009 TRI and DMR data. She stated that

a possible scenario is the calculations/molecular weights for the different “nitrate compounds” and “nitrate, total

nitrogen (as N)” in the different database s . Additionally, she stated that they recently received their new pe rmit

from the state implementing the new total nitrogen limits from the ELG. They are currently working with IEPA

to determine if any additional treatment is necessary to meet the limits.

On March 29, 2010, Ms. Rastessin returned my call and stated that t o report the nitrate compound load to TRI,

they monitor discharges for nitrate

- nitrogen. Using the concentration and the molecular weight, the

concentration (represented as NO3

- N) is multiplied by 4.43 to get estimate the nitrate concentration (NO3).

After calculating the nitrate concentration value, they multiply the concentration by the average flow in 2009 to

estimate the nitrate compound loading.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 11


                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                 -----------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                             Fiscal year ended
                                            ----------------------------------------------------
                                            March 28, 1997     March 29, 1996     March 31, 1995
                                            --------------     --------------     --------------
PRIMARY
-------

<S>                                            <C>                <C>                <C>      
Average shares outstanding                     8,955,000          8,930,000          9,150,000

Net effect of dilutive stock
       options - based on the
       treasury stock method using
       average market price                      158,000            142,000            153,000
                                             -----------        -----------        -----------

                 TOTAL                         9,113,000          9,072,000          9,303,000
                                             -----------        -----------        -----------

       Net income                            $24,656,000        $19,766,000        $13,684,000
                                             -----------        -----------        -----------

       Net income per share                  $      2.71        $      2.18        $      1.47
                                             ===========        ===========        ===========

FULLY DILUTED
-------------

Average shares outstanding                     8,955,000          8,930,000          9,150,000

Net effect of dilutive stock
  options - based on the
  treasury stock method using greater
  of year-end or average market price            158,000            155,000            153,000
                                             -----------        -----------        -----------

                 TOTAL                         9,113,000          9,085,000          9,303,000
                                             -----------        -----------        -----------

       Net income                            $24,656,000        $19,766,000        $13,684,000
                                             -----------        -----------        -----------

Net income per share                         $      2.71        $      2.18        $      1.47
                                             ===========        ===========        ===========
</TABLE>






                                     - 29 -
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 3.37
                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

      K-III MAGAZINE FINANCE CORPORATION, a corporation organized and existing
under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation"),

      DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

      FIRST: That the Board of Directors of the Corporation duly adopted
resolutions setting forth and declaring advisable a proposed amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation of said Corporation:

      RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of this Corporation be
      amended by changing the First Article so that, as amended, said Article
      shall be and read as follows: "The name of the Corporation is PRIMEDIA
      Magazine Finance Inc.".

      SECOND: That by written consent, filed with the minutes of the
Corporation, the sole stockholder approved said amendment in accordance with the
provisions of Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

      THIRD: That the aforesaid amendment to the Corporation's Certificate of
Incorporation was duly adopted in accordance with the applicable provisions of
Section 242 and Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said K-111 Magazine Finance Corporation has caused
this Certificate to be executed by Beverly Chell its authorized officer, on this
14th day of November, 1997.


                                           By
                                             Name: Beverly C. Chell
                                             Title: Vice Chairman & Secretary
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-21227

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KIRKPATRICK LAVONTE BROOKS,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(01-CR-458)

 

August 28, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kirkpatrick Lavonte Brooks pled guilty to possession of a

firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g),

and was sentenced to 120 months imprisonment and 3 years of

supervised release. He appeals his sentence as well as the factual

basis offered in support of his guilty plea. We affirm his

conviction, vacate his sentence, and remand for resentencing.

Brooks argues for the first time on appeal that the factual
1 United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 & n.12 (5th

Cir. 2001).

2 United States v. Jackson, 220 F.3d 635, 639 (5th Cir. 2000),

overruled by United States v. Charles, 2002 WL 1764147 (5th Cir.

July 31, 2002). 

3 Charles, 2002 WL 1764147, at *4.

basis offered in support of his guilty plea was insufficient to

support the interstate commerce element of his offense because it

only showed that the gun traveled in interstate commerce at some

point in the past. He concedes that this argument is foreclosed by

our precedent,1 and seeks only to preserve the claim for Supreme

Court review.

Brooks also argues that the district court erred in

calculating his base offense level under Section 2K2.1 of the

Sentencing Guidelines by treating his two prior convictions for

unauthorized use of a motor vehicle as “crimes of violence.”

Although the district court’s treatment of the prior convictions as

“crimes of violence” was correct under our precedent at the time,2

under our recent en banc decision in United States v. Charles,

unauthorized use of a vehicle is not a “crime of violence” for

sentencing purposes.3 Accordingly, we vacate Brooks’ sentence and

remand to the district court for re-sentencing.

Brooks also contends that the district court impermissibly

delegated its authority to the probation officer by permitting the

probation officer to determine Brooks’ "ability to pay" the costs

of drug and alcohol detection and treatment. Given that we have
vacated his sentence, this issue is moot and we decline to consider

the question.

We AFFIRM Brooks’ conviction, VACATE his sentence, and REMAND

for resentencing in accordance with this opinion.
No. 96-6887.

#### Samuel *v.*Duncan, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.