alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

| **Exhibit                  32** | **Section                  1350 Certifications** |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|

----

**Exhibit        32**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION**
**1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                  annual report of the Company for the period ended December 31,                  2006 as                  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date                  (the                  “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                  Michael C. Crapps   |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Michael                  C. Crapps       |   |
|   | Chief                  Executive Officer |   |
|   | March                   20, 2007    |   |
|   |                                     |   |
|   | /s/                  Joseph G. Sawyer    |   |
|   | Joseph                  G. Sawyer        |   |
|   | Chief                  Financial Officer |   |
|   | March                  20, 2007          |   |

----
No. 00-6051.

#### Risley *v.*Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1999 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to apply the frailty adjustment under PACE payment rules to certain specialized MA plans for 

special needs individuals. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 15, 2011 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. FRANKEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to apply 

the frailty adjustment under PACE payment rules to 

certain specialized MA plans for special needs individuals. 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Senior Medicare Fair3 ness Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF MA FRAILTY ADJUSTMENT. 

5 Section 1853(a)(1)(B)(iv) of the Social Security Act 

6 (42 U.S.C. 1395w–23(a)(1)(B)(iv)) is amended— 

7 (1) in subclause (I), by adding at the end the 

8 following new sentence: ‘‘For plan year 2013 and 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1999 IS

1 subsequent plan years, with respect to a plan that 

2 is described in subclause (III), the Secretary shall 

3 apply payment rules under section 1894(d) (other 

4 than paragraph (3) of such section) rather than the 

5 payment rules that would otherwise apply under this 

6 part for plan enrollees described in section 

7 1894(c).’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub9 clause: 

10 ‘‘(III) PLAN DESCRIBED.—A 

11 plan described in this subclause is a 

12 specialized MA plan for special needs 

13 individuals described in section 

14 1859(b)(6)(B)(ii) that offers inte15 grated Medicare and Medicaid services 

16 under a contract with the State Med17 icaid agency under title XIX and is 

18 offered by an MA organization that as 

19 of January 1, 2010, had a contract 

20 with such State Medicaid agency that 

21 participated in the ‘Demonstrations 

22 Serving Those Dually-Eligible for 

23 Medicare and Medicaid’ under this 

24 title.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
May 21, 2015

U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,

Washington, DC 20590

Submitted Electronically via the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS)

Re: Addendum to Exemption Request under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of 

the Federal Aviation Regulations

Dear Sir or Madam:

Darryl W. Lee, has prepared the following addendum to his Exemption Request filed on April 

24, 2015. This Addendum allows for the inclusion of additional Vertical Take-Off and Landing 

(VTOL) UA’s as follows:

• DJI Phantom 3 

• DJI Inspire 1

The UA’s listed above:

• Are produced by the same manufacturer as the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ in the original 

request

• Have the same components as the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ in the original request

• Have the same operating procedures as the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ in original request

• Will be operated in the same manner as the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ in the original request

THE UNMANNED AIRCRAFT (UA):

• DJI Models: Phantom 3, and Inspire 1 are lightweight (under 3lbs, and 6.5lb. gross 

weight respectively), battery operated Multi-Rotor VTOL aircraft

• An on-board flight computer with GPS navigation and location ability that receives 

signals for flight controls from a ground-based transmitter/controller

• An on-board camera attached to the UA via three axis gimbal, capable of capturing full 

color, high definition imagery

• An on-board telemetry system that delivers flight data from the on-board flight computer 

to the on-board radio transmitter including altitude AGL, horizontal and vertical speed, 

compass direction of flight and direction back to its launch site

THE GROUND STATION-BASED PART OF THE SYSTEM:

• A pilot in Command (PIC) in operation control of a flight operation from beginning to 

end and who controls the UA while in the air

• A radio transmitter/controller operated by the PIC to control the UA while in flight

• A Ground Station (Tablet or Smart Phone based App) which receives and displays real 

time system telemetry and imagery from the UA

• A Visual Observer (VO) is a person who provides a second pair of eyes to visually track 

the UA while in flight.

LEE – ADDENDUM ADDING ADDITIONAL UA’s Page 1 of 2
• Appendix A is part of the original request pertains to flight operations

• Appendix B is part of the original request and includes the DJI Phantom 2 Vision’s User’s 

Manual

• Appendix C includes the DJI Phantom 3 and Inspire 1’s User Manuals.

This addendum makes no other changes to the original request including exemptions sought, reasons for 

exemption request, and/or operating parameters.

The name and contact information of the applicant remains the same:

Darryl W. Lee

Phone: 512-868-7923

Email: deilee@msn.com

Appendix C – Users Manual (Phantom 3 and Inspire 1)

LEE – ADDENDUM ADDING ADDITIONAL UA’s Page 2 of 2

APPENDIX(C(–(USERS(MANUALS((DJI(PHANTOM(3,(INSPIRE(1)
This(page(intentionally(left(blank

LEE – APPENDIX C – USERS MANUALS
No. 99-7782.

#### Waterhouse *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
(Reap. Dec. 9127)

#### Leslie B. Canion *v.*United States

Entry No. 1950-H.

(Decided April 15, 1958)

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter (Howard Clare Carter*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. Spector,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

The.merchandise involved in this case consists of glassware and smokers’ articles, exported from France on or about October 3, 1954, and advanced in value by the appraiser.

When this case was called for trial, counsel for the respective parties stipulated as follows:

> Me. Caeter: May it please the court, I offer to stipulate that the merchandise consists of glassware and smokers’ articles exported from France on or about October 3, 1954. I further offer to stipulate that the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, is the invoice unit values plus 32.82 percent, and that there is no higher export value.

> Mr. Spector: We agree to stipulate those facts.

On the agreed facts, I find that foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of this merchandise and that such values are the invoice unit values, plus 32.82 percent.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### Jovita Perez *v.*United States

No. 8118.

Entry No. 1671.

*656First Division, Appellate Term

(Decided May 22, 1952)

*Lamb & Lerch (John O. Lerch*of counsel) for the appellant.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the appellee.

Before Oliver, Cole, and Mollison, Judges

Cole, Judge:

This application for review having been formally abandoned is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will he rendered accordingly.
(Reap. Dec. 9967)

#### H. T. Kennedy Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 860240.

(Decided April 5, 1961)

*Barnes, Riehardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*William JB. Orrick, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, ior the defendant.

Laweenoe, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a re-appraisement was called for hearing, plaintiff moved for submission of the case on the record, and the court so ordered.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 216 

To increase criminal penalties for certain knowing and intentional violations 

relating to food that is misbranded or adulterated. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 27, 2011 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. FRANKEN, Mr. KOHL, Mrs. 

FEINSTEIN, and Mr. DURBIN) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To increase criminal penalties for certain knowing and intentional violations relating to food that is misbranded or 

adulterated. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Food Safety Account5 ability Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PENALTIES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 47 of title 18, United 

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 216 IS

1 ‘‘§ 1041. Misbranded and adulterated food 

2 ‘‘(a) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘food’ 

3 has the meaning given that term in section 201 of the 

4 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321). 

5 ‘‘(b) OFFENSE.—Any person who violates subsection 

6 (a), (b), (c), or (k) of section 301 of the Federal Food, 

7 Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 331) with respect to 

8 any food— 

9 ‘‘(1) knowingly and intentionally to defraud or 

10 mislead; and 

11 ‘‘(2) with conscious or reckless disregard of a 

12 risk of death or serious bodily injury, 

13 shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for not more 

14 than 10 years, or both.’’. 

15 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

16 The table of sections for chapter 47 of title 18, United 

17 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol18 lowing: 

‘‘1041. Misbranded and adulterated food.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
No. 00-708.

#### Henderson et al. *v.*Simms et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 99-7827.

#### Pineda *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1)    | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                  |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|   | (2)    | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material                respects the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

|   |   |   | /s/                Caixia Peng                                                                         |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | Caixia                PengChief                Financial OfficerDate:                November 14, 2007 |

----
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2051 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to extend the reduced interest 

rate for Federal Direct Stafford Loans. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 31, 2012 

Mr. REED (for himself, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. FRANKEN, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. 

SANDERS, and Ms. STABENOW) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, 

and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to extend 

the reduced interest rate for Federal Direct Stafford Loans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INTEREST RATE EXTENSION. 

4 Section 455(b)(7)(D) of the Higher Education Act of 

5 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(b)(7)(D)) is amended— 

6 (1) in the matter preceding clause (i), by strik7 ing ‘‘and before July 1, 2012,’’; and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2051 IS

1 (2) in clause (v), by striking ‘‘and before July 

2 1, 2012,’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 96-8029.

#### Visintine *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1   BINGHAM CANYON CORPORATION  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Bingham Canyon Corporation certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  a. the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bingham Canyon Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  b. the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bingham Canyon Corporation.   Date: May 13, 2010/s/ Brett D. Mayer
Brett D. Mayer
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
## IN THE COURT OF CRIMINA L APP EALS OF TEX AS

N O
. W R

- 8 1 , 5 9 3

- 0 1

E X P A R T E R I C H A R D B E N A V I D E S

O R D E R P U R S U A N T T O T E X A S R U L E S O F A P P E L L A T E P R O C E D U R E 9
. 1 0

P e r c u r i a m .
O R D E R

T h i s c a u s e i s b e f

o r e t h i s C o u r t o n a p p l i c a t i o n f o r w r i t o f h a b e a s c o r p u s f r o m t r i a l

c o u r t c a s e n u m b e r C R 3 8 2 9 6 " A ” i n t h e 1 4 2 D i s t r i c t C o u r t o f M i d l a n d C o u n t y
. n d

P u r s u a n t t o T e x a s R u l e s o f A p p e l l a t e P r o c e d u r e 9

. 1 0 ( c ) , t h e C l e r k h a s i d e n t i f i e d

s e n s i t i v e d a t a o r s e a l e d m a t e r i a l i n t h e r e c o r d a n d t h e p a r t i e s h a v e b e e n n o t i f i e d

. T h e r e f

o r e ,
p u r s u a n t t o R u l e 9

. 1 0 ( f

) t h e f o l l o w i n g r e c o r d s a r e o r d e r e d s e a l e d o r r e d a c t e d

. T h e t r i a l c o u r t

c l e r k , c o u r t o f a p p e a l s o r a n y e n t i t y p o s s e s s i n g t h e s e d o c u m e n t s s h a l l s e a l o r r e d a c t t h e
d o c u m e n t s p u r s u a n t t o t h i s o r d e r

.WR -81,593-01 Rule 9.10 Or der - 2

L i s t d o c u m e n t s o r e x h i b i t s

.
T h e f o l l o w i n g r e c o r d s c o n t a i n t h e n a m e o f t h e c o m p l a i n a n t w h o w a s a m i n o r

. T E X

. C O D E

C R IM

. P R O C

. a r t 5 7

. 0 2 ( h )

S e a l r e c o r d o r r e d a c t n a m e - C l e r k ’ s R e c o r d P a g e s 5 3 , 5 4 , 1 6 2 , 1 6 4 , 1 7 8 , 1 7 9 , 1 8 0 , 1 8 1 , 1 8 3 ,
2 0 1 , 2 0 2 , 2 1 4 , 2 1 5 , 2 1 6 , 2 1 7 a n d 2 1 9

.

D e l i v e r e d : S e p t e m b e r 8 , 2 0 1 4

D o n o t p u b l i s h
**EXHIBIT 32.02****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of PDF Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May10, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Keith Jones, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Finance of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.     /s/ KEITH JONES     Keith Jones  *Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Finance*  *(Principal Financial Officer)*   Date: May 10, 2007
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# Congratulations FY19 DLA Enterprise Rotation Program!

By Dawn SuttonDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
Congratulations to the Fiscal Year 2019 Defense Logistics Agency Enterprise Rotation Program selectees:
                              - Anita Luich, People and Culture Directorate    
                              - Irena Mandeville, DLA Maritime Supplier Operations    
                              - Mary McWilliams, Engineering and Technical Support    
                              - Deborah Thompson, Engineering and Technical Support    
                              - Luna O. Velez, DLA Land Customer Operations    

These five associates from DLA Land and Maritime will participate in various developmental rotation programs throughout the year. 

Superb Job! Way to go by concentrating on your professional development!

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Culture L&MDLA L&MResource the Enterprise L&MPersonal Development L&MSupervisors L&MLeadership L&MSenior Leaders L&M
#### Lunham & Reeve, Inc., The Thermal Syndicate Ltd. *v.*United States

No. 6598.

Entry No. 739721, etc.

Invoices dated Wallsend, Northumberland, England, January 5, 1942, etc.

Certified January 6, 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 21, 1942, etc.

(Decided December 11, 1946)

*Jordan & Klingaman*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.