alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED NOVEMBER 10, 2011 

JERARTMENTOF 

U.S. DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION ; MANSFORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS JOCKtT OPERATIONS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

ZOii NOV 10 P 1:1" ! 

IN THE MATTER Of: ) 

) Docket No. [To Be Assigned] 

BRUNILDA ROSA ) 

) FDMS No. FAA-2011-0669 

Respondent ) 

OIU)ER 

SETTING SECOND LITIGATION SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

On Wednesday, November 09, 2011, the parties appeared by telephone for a Litigation 

Scheduling Conference. The parties discussed the status of the case, their calendar availability, 

and agreed to reconvene for a second litigation scheduling conference. 

It Is Hereby Ordered; 

1. The parties shall reconvene by telephone for a second litigation scheduling 

conference on Thursday, December 1,2011 at 10:30 am Eastern time. The Office 

of Hearings shall initiate the conference call. 

2. Prior to December 1, 2011, if the parties reach a settlement and wish to move to 

cancel the conference, they must file the necessary settlement withdrawal notice or 

other necessary document(s) with the Office of Hearings. 

3. If the parties do not reach a settlement, the Respondent shall file a written Answer by 

Tuesday, November 29, 2011. The Respondent may contact Ms. C. Diane Mays, at 

the Office of Hearings (202-366-2132), for assistance on how to file''th"e Answer. 

van 

rative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMSNO. FAA-2011-0669 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Brunilda Rosa, Respondenl 

2084 Bronx Place East 

Apt. 5J 

Bronx, NY 10462 

Ryan M. Landers, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ASO-7 

Southern Region 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: . 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use ihe following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 2059!; Auention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^30. 

- 2 -
#### PHILADELPHIA LOAN COMPANY v. ISAAC.

October 7, 1837.

*'Rule to show cause of action, and why defendant should not he discharged on common bail.*

■ In an action on a promissory note, an affidavit to hold to bail which does not state whether the plaintiff holds it as payee or endorsee, or in what character, is defective.

THIS was a *capias ad respondendum.*The defendant obtained this rule. The plaintiffs produced an affidavit of one of the officers of the company, as follows:—

“T. M. Moore, cashier of the Philadelphia Loan Company, above named, being duly sworn according to law, saith, that the defendant is indebted to the Philadelphia Loan Company in the sum of one hundred and twenty dollars upon a promissory note drawn by said defendant, which said note is due and unpaid, and that to the best of deponent’s knowledge and belief, the defendant is about to quit this commonwealth, without leaving sufficient real or personal estate therein to satisfy the said demand.”

*Whitman,*for plaintiffs.

*H. M. Phillips,*for defendant,

said that the affidavit was defective because it did not state whether the plaintiffs held the note as *payee*or *endorsee.*

Per Curiam.—

The rule, gathered from all the cases, seems to be well established, that an affidavit to hold to bail, in a suit on a bill or note, should disclose that the party suing has an interest in the bill or note as payee, endorsee, or in some other character. 7 *East*94; 2 *Brod.*& *Bing.*343; 7 *Taunt.*171; 2 *B.*& *B.*388; *Petersdorff on Bail*(10 *Law Library)*98.

Rule absolute.
#### Murphy, Appellant, *v.*Pinney et al.

*Real estate*— Leases—Interpretation—Landlord *and tenant.*

In an action of replevin to recover possession of personal property levied upon for unpaid rent, it appeared that the plaintiff, a tenant, claimed the property distrained on the ground that under a parol agreement she was entitled to a larger tenement (the entire basement) than that which was actually mentioned in the lease. It was admitted that the area which she occupied was the same as when the lease was made.

*Reid:*That if the parties intended to include all of the basement in the lease, they should have so stated in the written instrument. The failure to remove the partition in the cellar was, therefore, no defense to the covenants of the lease, and judgment in favor of the plaintiff will be sustained.

Argued April 13, 1926.

Appeal No. 172, April T., 1926, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Erie County, September T., 1922, No. 297, in the case of Kathryn Murphy v. A. M. Pinney.

Before Porter, P. J., Henderson, Teexler, Keeler, Linn, Gawthrop and Cunningham, JJ.

Affirmed.

Replevin to recover possession of property levied upon. Before Hirt, J.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.

The Court directed a verdict in favor of the defendant. Plaintiff appealed.

*iErrors assigned*were various rulings on evidence and the charge of the Court.

*John B. Brooks,*of *Brooks & English,*and with him *Frank B. Quinn,*for appellant.

*152
      *C. O. Tayntor*and *C. P. Hewes,*and with them *C. D. Higby)*for appellee.

July 8, 1926:

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

A. M. Pinney owned a building on Peach Street, Erie, P'a., the first floor of which was divided into two large rooms running the length of the building with basement rooms under each.

No. 1516 Peach Street was leased to Ida M. Snyder and No. 1514 to Kathryn Murphy, the appellant in this case. Sometime during the running of a former lease, the landlord constructed a board partition in the basement under the Murphy store, the boards being nailed close together and having merely an opening at the end which was covered with wire netting and thus Miss Murphy had but one-third of the basement and the two-thirds, being the front part, were occupied by Mrs. Snyder. When the present lease was made, Miss Murphy had possession of only her third part of the basement. She paid her rent for a number of months but finally refused to pay because she said fwhen the lease was] made Pinney agreed to remove the partition in the cellar and give her the entire basement under her store.

She admits that she was at the time the lease was made out of possession of the front part of the basement and that someone else occupied it. The ease was here on a former appeal and is reported in 86 Pa. Superior Ct. 458. We there held that if the parties intended to include the entire basement in the- lease, they should have so stated in the written instrument. We see no reason for changing our conclusion and it would be useless to repeat here what we have already said there.

The assignments of error are overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael McDANIELS.

No. 97-KH-3090.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1998.

In re McDaniels, Michael; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 27258-KA; Parish of Franklin, 5th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 94-72.

Denied.

TRAYLOR, J., recused.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.
No. 96-6058.

#### Holub *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 145 (Tuesday, July 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19947]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission to OMB Under 
Delegated Authority

Background

    Notice is hereby given of the final approval of a proposed 
information collection by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System (Board) under OMB delegated authority, as per 5 CFR 1320.16 (OMB 
Regulations on Controlling Paperwork Burdens on the Public). The 
Federal Reserve may not conduct or sponsor, and the respondent is not 
required to respond to, an information collection that has been 
extended, revised, or implemented on or after October 1, 1995, unless 
it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chief, Financial Reports Section--Mary M. McLaughlin--Division of 
Research and Statistics, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System, Washington, DC 20551 (202-452-3829)
OMB Desk Officer--Alexander T. Hunt--Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive 
Office Building, Room 3208, Washington, DC 20503 (202-395-7860)
    Final approval under OMB delegated authority of the extension for 
three years, without revision, of the following report:
    1. Report title: Request for Proposal (RFP); Request for Price 
Quotations (RFPQ)
Agency form number: n/a
OMB Control number: 7100-0180
Frequency: on occasion
Reporters: vendors and suppliers
Annual reporting hours: 7,610
Estimated average hours per response: 20.0 (RFP); 0.5 (RFPQ)
Number of respondents: 248 (RFP); 5,300 (RFPQ)
Small businesses are affected.
    General description of report: This information collection is 
required to obtain or retain a benefit (12 U.S.C. sections 243, 244, 
and 248) and is not given confidential treatment unless a respondent 
requests that portions of the information be kept confidential and the 
Board grants the request pursuant to the applicable exemptions provided 
by the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. section 552).
    Abstract: The Federal Reserve Board uses the RFP and the RFPQ as 
needed to obtain competitive proposals and contracts from approved 
vendors of goods and services. Depending upon the goods and services 
for which the Federal Reserve Board is seeking competitive bids, the 
respondent is requested to provide either prices for providing the 
goods or services (RFPQ) or a document covering not only prices, but 
also the means of performing a particular service and a description of 
the qualification of the staff who will perform the service (RFP). The 
Board staff uses this information to analyze the proposals and to 
select the best offer.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 24, 1997.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-19947 Filed 7-28-97; 8:45AM]
Billing Code 6210-01-F
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,718
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,918
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,997
<INVENTORY>                                     38,437
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,756
<PP&E>                                          59,316
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,654
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 251,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,931
<BONDS>                                        178,498
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,331
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   251,213
<SALES>                                        311,732
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               311,732
<CGS>                                          225,479
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  278,982
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,335
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,670
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,453
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,395
<INCOME-TAX>                                       417
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,978
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,978
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
steam_record - Fw: RRI Avon Lake Plant Request for ICR Extension 

 

-----Forwarded by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US on 07/02/2010 08:03PM ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Rogatto, Daniel A." <DARogatto@rrienergy.com> 

Date: 06/29/2010 03:02PM 

cc: "Smith, James R. (Randy)" <JRSmith@rrienergy.com>, "Lackowski, Claude M." 

<CMLackowski@rrienergy.com>, "Laeng, Robert W." <RLaeng@rrienergy.com> 

Subject: RRI Avon Lake Plant Request for ICR Extension 

Ms. Alicea,

 Please find attached correspondence for EPA’s consideration to extend the deadline to complete and comply 

for the RRI Avon Lake Plant effluent ICR requirements.

If you have any questions, please call me.

Dan Rogatto

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: <steam_record@erg.com>, <jordan.ronald@epa.gov>

Date: 7/2/2010 7:04 PM

Subject: Fw: RRI Avon Lake Plant Request for ICR Extension

Attachments: 20100629131747861.pdf

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C2E383CD... 3/21/2011
First Amendment to Senior Executive Severance Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.13 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC. 
 SENIOR EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PLAN 
 A. The Boston Properties, Inc. Senior Executive Severance Plan, as adopted as of July 30, 1998 (the “Plan”), is hereby amended as follows:

 1. Section 1 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the term “the President,” before the reference to “the Executive
Vice-Presidents” in the third sentence thereof. 
 2. Section 5(b) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the third sentence
thereof and substituting therefor the following: 
 “The initial Gross-Up Payment, if any, as determined pursuant to this
Section 5(b), shall be paid as withholding taxes to the taxing authorities on behalf of the Covered Employee at such time or times when the Excise Tax is due.” 
 3. The Plan is hereby further amended by adding the following Section 16 at the end thereof: 
 “16. Section 409A. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the foregoing, if at the time of Covered Employee’s separation from service within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the ‘Code’), the Covered Employee is considered a ‘specified employee’ within the meaning of Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code, and if any payment or benefit that the Covered Employee becomes entitled to under
this Plan would be considered deferred compensation subject to interest, penalties and additional tax imposed pursuant to Section 409A(a) of the Code as a result of the application of Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code, then no such
payment or benefit shall be payable or provided prior to the date that is the earlier of (i) six months and one day after the Covered Employee’s separation from service, or (ii) the Covered Employee’s death. Any such deferred
payment shall earn simple interest calculated at the short-term applicable federal rate in effect on the Date of Termination. On or before the Covered Employee’s Date of Termination, the Company shall make an irrevocable contribution to a rabbi
trust with an independent bank trustee in an amount equal to the amount of such deferred payment plus interest.” 
  







 B. Except as amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment has been executed on behalf of the Company by its duly
authorized officer this 18th day of October, 2007. 
 BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC. 
 By:  /s/  E. Mitchell
Norville                 
         Name: E. Mitchell Norville 
         Title: Executive Vice President, 
                   Chief Operating Officer 
  

 2
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Alfonso Hernandez a/k/a * From the 35 th District Court

Alfonso Darden, of Brown County,

Trial Court No. CR22627

.

Vs. No. 11

- 14

- 00324

- CR * November 30 , 2016

The State of Texas

, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J

. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this

court ’ s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
**Exhibit
      32**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








Michael
      W. Dosland, President and Chief Executive Officer and Michael S. Moderski,
      Senior Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer of First Federal Bankshares,
      Inc. (the “Company”) each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company
      that he has reviewed the annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for the
      fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 and that to the best of his
      knowledge:





(1)  the
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations.





The
      purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section
      1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002.








September
                13, 2006
            
            /s/Michael W. DoslandDate
            
            President
                and Chief Executive OfficerSeptember
                13, 2006
            
            /s/Michael S. ModerskiDate
            
            Senior
                Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  quarterly  report of Sonoma  Valley  Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  We,
Mel Switzer, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Mary Dieter Smith, Chief Financial
Officer, of the Company certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
our knowledge and belief:

        (1)    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Company.


         Dated: November 10, 2004                  /s/ Mel Switzer, Jr.
                -----------------                  -----------------------------
                                                   Mel Switzer, Jr.,
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   (Principal Executive Officer)

         Dated: November 10, 2004                  /s/ Mary Dieter Smith
                -----------------                  -----------------------------
                                                   Mary Dieter Smith,
                                                   Executive Vice President
                                                   Chief Operating Officer and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   (Principal Financial and
                                                   Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shandong Zhouyuan Seed and Nursery Co., Ltd (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief Financial Officer, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:  August 14, 2009                 /s/ Yiqun Liu ------------------------------- Yiqun Liu, CFO
Exhibit 21.1

List of Material Subsidiaries



|                                      |  |                                           
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Name                                  |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation/Organization
|National Tank Company                 |  | Delaware                                  
|Total Engineering Services Team, Inc. |  | Louisiana                                 
|TEST Automation & Controls, Inc.      |  | Louisiana                                 
|NATCO Canada, Ltd.                    |  | Ontario, Canada                           
|Axsia Holdings, Ltd.                  |  | England & Wales                           
|Axsia Group, Ltd.                     |  | England & Wales                           
|NTC Technical Services, Inc.          |  | Delaware