# Enclosure 1

### ENCLOSURE 1



# INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST FOR Off

- Site Waste and Recovery Operations

This information collection request is being conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Office of Air and Radiation (OAR) to assist the EPA Administrator in developing emission standards for Off

- Site Waste and Recovery Operations under Clean Air Act (CAA) section 112. The survey is being sent under the authority of Section 114 of the CAA.

BACKGROUND:

Section 112 (d) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) calls for EPA to promulgate national technology

- based emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for sources emitting one or more of the HAP listed in CAA section 112(b). For major sources, these technology

- based standards must reflect the maximum de gree of emissions reductions of HAP achievable (after considering cost, energy requirements, and nonair quality health and environmental impacts). In addition, under CAA section 112(d)(6), EPA is required to review the technology

- based standards and revi se them “as necessary (taking into account developments in practices, processes, and control technologies)” no less frequently than every 8 years. Furthermore, we are required by section 112(f) (2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) to assess the risk remaining ( residual risk) eight years after the promulgation of maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards under section 112(d). If we find the residual risk fails to protect public health with an ample margin of safety or to prevent (taking into conside ration various factors) adverse environmental effects, we are required to promulgate more stringent standards.

The Off

- Site Waste and Recovery Operations maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards were promulgated on July 1, 1996 (see 61 FR 34140). We are collecting specific detailed information to support development of standards as part of our review as described above. Please note this survey is for off

site waste and recovery operations only.

CAA section 114(a) states that the Adminis trator may require any person who owns or operates any emission source, who manufactures emission control equipment or process equipment, who the Administrator believes may have information necessary for the purposes set forth in section 114(a), or who is subject to any requirement of the CAA (other than certain provisions under Title II), to provide EPA with information for the following purposes:

1. Developing or assisting in the development of the following:

a. State implementation plans (§§ 110 and 111(d)); b. New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) (§ 111);

c. National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) (§ 112); d. Solid waste combustion or other related solid waste regulations (§ 129); 2. Determining whether any person is in violation of any stan dards or requirements developed under the authorities cited above; or 3. Carrying out any provision under the CAA (except certain provisions under Title II).

The Administrator may require that those persons identified above do the following so the Administra tor may have the information necessary for the items listed in #1

- 3:

 establish and maintain records;

 make reports;

###  install, use, and maintain monitoring equipment, and use audit procedures, or methods;

 sample emissions (in accordance with such procedur es or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe);

 keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissio ns is impractical;

 submit compliance certifications in accordance with section 114(a)(3); and

 provide such other information as the Administrator may reasonably require.

DIRECTIONS:

 All recipients must complete and return this survey by April 10 , 2013

.

 Please identify clearly any response(s) that you consider to be confidential business information (CBI). Any responses not so identified will be included in a publicly available database. Refer to Enclosures 3, 4, 5, and 6 for more information on the tr eatment of CBI and a list of information you may be asked to submit later to substantiate a claim of confidentiality.

DEFINITIONS: For the purposes of this ICR only, terms used have the meanings attributed to them in 40 CFR 63.681.

CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) :

Please indicate if any CBI is included in this survey response: 

##  Y 

# ■ N

OFF

- SITE WASTE AND RECOVERY OPERATIONS We believe that you own a facility that has Off

- Site Waste and Recovery Operations. If you believe that this survey does not pertain to you, please indicate your reason below: 

##  The Off

- Site Waste and Recove ry Operations are permanently shut down. Please also identify the date the Off

- Site Waste and Recovery Operations were shut down, what steps were taken to close the equipment or stop operations, and if you still have a permit.

_________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________ ________________

________________________________________________________________ ________________ 

# ■ No Off

- Site Waste and Recovery Operations at this facility. Please identify the operations at the facility.

The Ponca City Refinery does receive off

- site material that contains HAPs listed in 40 CFR 63 Subpart DD. However, the amount of total HAP in the off

- site waste received is less than 1 Mg/yr. As such, per 40 CFR 63.680(d), the refinery meets the criteria for the facility

- wide exemption from the rule and so is not required to comply with the requirements of §§63.682 through 63.699.

The Phillips 66 Company Ponca C ity Refinery (Refinery) refines crude oil to produce propane, gasoline, heating oil, residual fuels, petroleum coke and other miscellaneous petroleum products. Major units at the Refinery include three crude units, two fluidized catalytic cracking units ( FCCUs) , a coker and other major upgrading units

. Major process units include:

• Fluidized catalytic cracking units to upgrade gas oil to gasoline and diesel fuel

• Alkylation, polymerization and catalytic reforming units to produce high octane gasoline blend ing components• A coker to crack/convert residuals into lighter hydrocarbon compounds and produce anode grade coke for aluminum manufacturing

• Multiple desulfurization units to remove sulfur from products and intermediates, allowing production of low sulfur products from high sulfur feedstocks.

• Amine contactors and regenerators to recover hydrogen sulfide (H2S) from various Refinery process streams such as fuel gas, hydrotreater recycle hydrogen, and propane product streams.



### If you r facility do es not have Off

- Site Waste and Recovery Operations, please respond as soon as possible. We will review that information and respond as to whether you need to complete any other part of the survey.

# Enclosure 2

### U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

Page 1 of 12 General Information

Name of Legal Owner: Phillips 66

Legal Owner Address: 3010 Briarpark Drive Houston, Texas 77042

Number of Legal Owner Employees: IRS Employer Identification No. 45-3779385

Facility Name: Ponca City Refinery

Facility Address: 1000 South Pine Street Ponca City, Oklahoma 74601

Mailing Address (if different from facility address):

Facility Contact Name: Neta Hercyk

Facility Contact Title: Environmental Scientist

Facility Contact Phone Number: (580) 767-4182

Facility Contact Email Address: neta.l.hercyk@p66.com

Number of Company Employees at the Entire Facility: Ponca City Refinery Employees = 661

Please enter any other comments regarding general ownership
information here:

### U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

Page 2 of 12 Facility Information

Is the facility a major source for HAP? (see definition below)
Major sources are any stationary source or group of stationary sources located within a contiguous area and under common control that emits or has the potential to emit considering controls, in the aggregate, 10 tons per year (TPY) or more of any
hazardous air pollutant or 25 TPY or more of any combination of

HAP.

Are there one or more off-site waste management or recovery operations at the facility subject to the Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations (OSWRO) MACT (40 CFR 63, subpart DD)?

Is the facility exempt from complying with the OSWRO MACT?

What type(s) of off-site waste does the facility accept? (please include shipment method, physical form (i.e., solid, liquid, sludge), and a general description)

Approximately how many sources (facilities) does that waste
come from?

What is the base year for which information is being provided? (please limit reporting years between 2006 and 2012, and provide the most current year)

For this base year, what was the amount of off-site waste received? (please specify units; e.g., gal/yr)

For this base year, what was the HAP content of the off-site waste received? (please specify units; e.g., tons)

How many hours per year are control devices bypassed to the atmosphere to perform routine maintenance?

Are any OSWRO operations scheduled to be discontinued?

Are any OSWRO operations scheduled to be added or expanded?

What is the permitting classification of your facility?

What are the operating permit IDs for the OSWRO operations at your facility?

Is your operating permit available online?

Please provide the coordinates (in decimal degrees) of your facility property boundary at each corner (node). Alternatively, please provide the minimum distance from any OSWRO emission point to the facility property boundary.

Please enter any other comments regarding the facility here: If yes, please explain:

NA Jupiter Facility - water - water sewer line R&D West Facility - water - water sewer line Product terminal - water - tank truck (2,100 gallons/load)

3

NA NA

If yes, please provide a link to or a copy of your most recent operating permit. If no, please provide a copy of your most recent operating permit. 0.27 megagrams

If yes, please provide date(s) that addition(s) and/or expansion(s) will begin production and explain changes: If yes, please provide dates of closure and explain changes:
NA

NA The Ponca City Refinery does receive off-site
material that contains HAPs listed in 40 CFR 63 Subpart DD. However, the amount of total HAP in the off-site waste received is less than 1 Mg/yr. As such, per 40 CFR 63.680(d), the refinery meets the criteria for the facility-wide exemption from the rule and so is not required to comply with the requirements of §§63.682 through 63.699.

2012

4,417,584 gallons of water

### U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

Page 3 of 12 If no, please explain.


### NA

If no, please explain.


### NA

If "Other", please explain:

NA

If "Other", please explain:


### NA

If neither apply, please explain: The Ponca City Refinery is subject to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CC (Refinery MACT) and NSPS GGGa

If yes, please describe the control technique(s):



### NA Please provide the additional capital and annual costs of this practice above that required by the OSWRO NESHAP:

NA

Pumps NA Compressors NA Agitators NA
Pressure relief devices NA Sampling connection systems NA Open-ended valves or lines NA
Connectors NA Instrumentation systems NA Equipment Leaks

Have you verified and/or corrected the equipment leak emissions for your OSWRO processes in Enclosure 2A?

Have you completed all control information fields for your OSWRO equipment leaks in Enclosure 2A?

What emissions calculation approach was used to estimate the equipment leak emissions?

Please enter any other comments regarding equipment leaks here: What is the number of each type of component for the equipment in OSWRO HAP service (equipment that contacts off-site material having a total HAP concentration ≥ 10% by weight for 300 hours/year or more)? With which subpart do you comply for equipment leaks? Please provide documentation demonstrating the basis for the equipment leak emissions estimates. What type of documentation are you providing?

Are you implementing work practices or other HAP control techniques beyond those required by the MACT standard?

### U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

If no, please explain.



### NA

If no, please explain.



### NA

If "Other", please explain:

NA

If "Other", please explain:



### NA

If yes, please describe the control technique(s):



### NA Please provide the additional capital and annual costs of this practice above that required by the OSWRO NESHAP:

NA

Please enter any other comments regarding transfer systems here: Transfer Systems

Have you entered the OSWRO transfer system emissions in
Enclosure 2A?

Have you completed all control information fields for your OSWRO transfer systems in Enclosure 2A?

What emissions calculation approach was used to estimate the transfer system emissions?

Are you implementing work practices or other HAP control techniques beyond those required by the MACT standard? Please provide documentation demonstrating the basis for the transfer system emissions estimates. Are you providing
emissions factors or source test data?

### U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

If no, please explain.



### NA

If no, please explain.



### NA

If "Other", please explain:

NA

If "Other", please explain:



### NA

If yes, please describe the control technique(s):



### NA Please provide the additional capital and annual costs of this practice above that required by the OSWRO NESHAP:

NA

Please enter any other comments regarding organic or oilwater separators here: Are you implementing work practices or other HAP control techniques beyond those required by the MACT standard? Please provide documentation demonstrating the basis for the oil-water and organic-water separators emissions
estimates. Are you providing emissions factors or source
test data? Oil-water and organic-water separators

Have you entered the OSWRO oil-water and organic-water separators emissions in Enclosure 2A?

Have you completed all control information fields for your OSWRO oil-water and organic-water separators in Enclosure
2A?

What emissions calculation approach was used to estimate the oil-water and organic-water separators emissions?

### U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

If no, please explain.

If no, please explain.

If "Other", please explain:



### Please list each OSWRO container requiring Level 1 or Level 2 control:

Container ID Container capacity Container emissions control level implemented

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA 

### NA If "Other", please explain:



### Please enter any other comments regarding containers here: (add information for more containers as necessary) Are you implementing work practices or other HAP control techniques beyond those required by the MACT standard?

NA If yes, please describe the control technique(s):



### Please provide the additional capital and annual costs of this practice above that required by the

OSWRO NESHAP:

NA NA

NA

NA



### Please provide documentation demonstrating the basis for
the containers emissions estimates. Are you providing
emissions factors or source test data? Containers

Have you entered the OSWRO containers emissions in
Enclosure 2A?

Have you completed all control information fields for your
OSWRO containers in Enclosure 2A?

What emissions calculation approach was used to estimate
the containers emissions?

### U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

If no, please explain.



### NA

If no, please explain.



### NA

If "Other", please explain:

NA

If "Other", please explain:



### NA

NA

NA

Please enter any other comments regarding surface impoundments here: If yes, please describe the control technique(s):



### Please provide the additional capital and annual costs of this practice above that required by the OSWRO NESHAP: Surface Impoundments

Have you entered the OSWRO surface impoundments
emissions in Enclosure 2A?

Have you completed all control information fields for your OSWRO surface impoundments in Enclosure 2A?

What emissions calculation approach was used to estimate the surface impoundments emissions?

Are you implementing work practices or other HAP control techniques beyond those required by the MACT standard? Please provide documentation demonstrating the basis for the surface impoundments emissions estimates. Are you providing emissions factors or source test data?

### U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

Page 8 of 12 If no, please explain.

If no, please explain. Process Vent Emissions Information

Have you verified and/or corrected the process vent emissions for your OSWRO processes in Enclosure 2A?

Have you completed all control information fields for your OSWRO process vent streams in Enclosure 2A?

NA What emissions calculation approach was used to estimate the process vent emissions?

Please provide documentation demonstrating the basis for the process vent emissions estimates. Are you providing
emissions factors or source test data? NA

NA

Are you implementing work practices or other HAP control techniques beyond those required by the MACT standard?

Please enter any other comments regarding process vents
here: If "Other", please explain:

If yes, please describe the control technique(s):



### Please provide the additional capital and annual costs of this practice above that required by the OSWRO NESHAP:

NA NA NA

If "Other", please explain:

### U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

Page 9 of 12 Tanks Emissions Information

NA NA NA

Please list each OSWRO tank requiring Level 1 or Level 2 control:

Tank ID Tank capacity Tank content MTVP 1 

### Tank content AVP 2 

### Tank height Tank diameter Tank average annual throughput Tank emissions control equipment

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

1 

### Maximum True HAP Vapor Pressure

2 

### Average HAP Vapor Pressure For each tank with an internal floating roof, please list the slotted ladder information:

Tank ID Number of ladders with slotted legs Gasketed deck cover over slotted ladder(s)? Ladder sleeve over slotted ladder(s)? Pole wipers in place for slotted ladder legs?

NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA



### For each tank with a fixed roof, please list the tank fitting information:

Tank ID Number of access
hatches Number of gauge
hatches Number of

conservation vents Number of valves/instruments Number of

emergency
NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

1 

### Maximum True HAP Vapor Pressure

For each tank with a floating roof (internal or external), please list the tank information:

Tank ID Annual number of days roof rests on landing legs Length of landing legs

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA If "Other", please explain:


### NA

If "Other", please explain:



### Please enter any other comments regarding tanks here: NA If yes, please describe the control technique(s):



### (add information for more tanks as necessary)

(add information for more tanks as necessary)

(add information for more tanks as necessary)

(add information for more tanks as necessary) Please provide the additional capital and annual costs of this practice above that required by the OSWRO NESHAP: Please provide documentation demonstrating the basis
for the tanks emissions estimates. Are you providing emissions factors, source test data or other data?

NA

Are you implementing work practices or other HAP control techniques beyond those required by the MACT
standard? Have you entered the tanks emissions for your OSWRO processes in Enclosure 2A?

Have you completed all control information fields for your OSWRO storage vessels in Enclosure 2A?

What emissions calculation approach was used to
estimate the tank emissions? If no, please explain.

If no, please explain. 

### NA

NA

### U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

Page 10 of 12 Off-Site Material Treatment

If you treat off-site waste using biological degradation, please answer the following questions:

Please enter any other comments regarding off-site waste
treatment here: NA 

### Do you perform any testing or other practices to determine whether fouling agents may be in the waste
received? NA 

### What method of off-site waste HAP reduction is used?

NA

How do you characterize the components of the waste products you receive that are treated with biological degradation? NA If "Other" or more than one of the above applies, please explain.

### U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

Page 11 of 12 Startup and Shutdown Events

If no for any of the above, please explain:

Please provide the following information about all startup and shutdown events: Process Vents

Tanks

1. What emissions source types experience startup and shutdown events? Equipment Leaks

Transfer Systems

Organic and Oil-Water Separators

Containers

Surface Impoundments Containers T he United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated portions of two provisions in the EPA’s CAA section 112 regulations governing the emissions of HAP during periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction (SSM). Sierra Club v. EPA, 551 F.3d 1019 (D.C. Cir. 2008). Specifically, the Court vacated the SSM exemption contained in 40 CFR 63.6(f)(1) and 40 CFR 63.6(h)(1), that are part of a regulation, commonly referred to as the “General Provisions Rule,” that the EPA promulgated under section 112 of the CAA. When incorporated into CAA section 112(d) regulations for specific source categories, these two, now vacated, provisions exempted sources from the requirement to comply with the otherwise applicable CAA section 112(d) emission standard during periods of SSM. To be consistent with the Court’s decision, facilities must comply with the applicable standards at all time s.

For each emission source type, do the annual emissions estimate in the Enclosure 2A "Emissions (TPY)" field include the annual emissions from startup and shutdown events that you added in the "STARTUP EMISSIONS (TPY)" and "SHUTDOWN EMISSIONS (TPY)" fields? Please enter a separate response for each emissions point type below:

For each emission source type, can you comply with the emissions limitation and/or work practices in the regulation that apply during normal operation during startup and shutdown events? Please enter a separate response for each emissions point type
below: Surface Impoundments

Tanks

Organic and Oil-Water Separators Process Vents

Equipment Leaks

Transfer Systems

### U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

P age 12 of 12 Startup and Shutdown Events

Please enter any other comments regarding startup or shutdown here: 6. How do you determine the HAP emissions during the event?

7. How are control devices and work practices used to minmize emissions during the startup or shutdown event?
8. What compliance determination method(s) do you use during startup and shutdown events (e.g., monitor with CEMS)? 1.c. How does the startup or shutdown event compare to normal operations (e.g., differences in flowrate, temp., pressure, alternate fuels used, alternate control devices used, etc.)? 1.a. Under normal operating conditions, do these emissions sources operate continuously?

9. During startup and shutdown events, if you cannot comply with the emissions limitation and/or work practices in the regulation that apply during normal operation, what is the minimum emissions level that could be achieved?

9.c. How much would HAP emissions be reduced compared to an uncontrolled event? (If "emission factor" is used as basis for emissions estimate, please provide the emission factor and sources of the emission

factor. 1 

### ) 4. What marks the end of the startup or shutdown event? 2. How often do startup or shutdown events occur?

3. What is the average and range of event duration? 1.d. How are emissions released to the atmosphere (e.g., through a pressure relief device)? 1.b. What triggers the equipment to experience a startup or shutdown event (e.g. hot startup, startup after an emergency shutdown, re-start, control device startup)?

9.a. Please describe how HAP emissions would be minimized.

9.b. How much would it cost to minimize HAP emissions in this manner?

1 If "source test" is used as basis for emissions estimate, please provide a copy of the

source test. 

### 5. What safety issues are connected with a startup or shutdown event?

# Enclosure 2a

### Enclosure 2a

Page 1 Please complete this table for all OSWRO emission units. Please report all emissions related to the off-site waste handled and/or treated.

Facility Name Emission Unit ID Process ID Emissio

n Release Point ID SCC
Code 1 

### Emissions Start Date Emissions End Date Pollutant CAS
Number 2 

### Pollutant Name (include organic and non-organic pollutants) Actual Emissio ns (TPY) MACTAllowable Emissions (TPY) 3 

### Routine Emission

s Max Hourly (lbs/hr) Startup Emissio ns (TPY) Startup Emissio

ns (lbs/hr) Shutdo

wn Emissi

ons (TPY) Shutdo

wn Emissio

ns (lbs/hr) MACT Source Category Emission Release

Point Type 4 

### Stack Height (ft) Exit Gas Temperatu re ( ° F) Stack Diameter (ft) Exit Gas Velocity (ft/sec) Exit Gas Flow Rate (ft3/sec) FugitiveLength (EW) (ft) FugitiveWidth (NS) (ft) Fugitive Angle (degrees)

5 

### Longitude (decimal degrees) 6 

### Latitude (decimal degrees) 6 

### Is Control Measur

e In Place? Control Measur

e 7 

### Control Measur

e Efficien
cy Comments

Phillips 66 Ponca City Refinery NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA The Ponca City Refinery does receive off-site material that contains HAPs listed in 40 CFR 63 Subpart DD. However, theamount of total HAP in the offsite waste received is less than 1 Mg/yr. As such, per 40 CFR 63.680(d), the refinery meets the criteria for the facility-wide exemption from the rule and so is not required to comply with the requirements of §§63.682 through 63.699.

1 

### For SCC Code, please input one of the following codes: SCC SCC Description 50310001 Waste Disposal, Solid Waste Disposal-Industrial, Non-TSDF Treatment, Storage, Disposal Processes, Equipment Leaks 50310002 Waste Disposal, Solid Waste Disposal-Industrial, Non-TSDF Treatment, Storage, Disposal Processes, Containers 50310003 Waste Disposal, Solid Waste Disposal-Industrial, Non-TSDF Treatment, Storage, Disposal Processes, Tanks 50310004 Waste Disposal, Solid Waste Disposal-Industrial, Non-TSDF Treatment, Storage, Disposal Processes, Organic and Oil-Water Separators 50310005 Waste Disposal, Solid Waste Disposal-Industrial, Non-TSDF Treatment, Storage, Disposal Processes, Surface Impoundments 50310006 Waste Disposal, Solid Waste Disposal-Industrial, Non-TSDF Treatment, Storage, Disposal Processes, Transfer Systems

50310007 Waste Disposal, Solid Waste Disposal-Industrial, Non-TSDF Treatment, Storage, Disposal Processes, Process Vents

2 

### See List of HAPs in separate worksheet for a table of CAS numbers and HAPs

3 

### MACT- allowable emissions are the maximum emission levels allowed while in compliance with the MACT standards

4 

### Emission point type choices include: fugitive, vertical, horizontal, goose neck, vertical with rain cap, or downward-facing vent

5 

### Fugitive Angle: Specifies the rotation of the source from north (in the clockwise direction). The location coordinates should reflect the southwest corner of the area source as shown in this graphic:

6 

### Location of stack or southwest corner of a fugitive emissions release point

7 

### For control measures, please include all control measures used for that emission point, including but not limited to:

Activated Carbon Adsorption list specific type in Control
Measure Comments
column

Combustor list specific type in Control
Measure Comments
column Electrostatic Precipitator Fabric Filter/Baghouse Flare Pressurized Tank Fixed Roof Tank Fixed Roof Tank Vented to Control
Device External Floating Roof Tank Fixed Roof Tank
with Internal Floating Roof Vapor Balancing Floating Membrane Cover Cover Vented to Control Device High-Efficiency
Particulate Air Filter (HEPA)

Leak Detection and Repair Program

Condenser

Scrubber list specific type in Control
Measure Comments
column

Multiple Controls in Series list specific types in Control
Measure Comments
column

Other Control
Device describe in Control
Measure Comments
column (annual average if the parameter varies) Vertical Emissions Release Point Parameters Fugitive Emissions Release Point Parameters

### Enclosure 2a

Page 2 Pollution Prevention Technique describe in Control
Measure Comments
column

Process Modification describe in Control
Measure Comments
column

# DRAFT

Pollutant Name CAS No. Acetaldehyde 75070 Acetamide 60355 Acetonitrile 75058 Acetophenone 98862 2-Acetylaminofluorene 53963 Acrolein 107028 Acrylamide 79061 Acrylic acid 79107 Acrylonitrile 107131 Allyl chloride 107051 4-Aminobiphenyl 92671 Aniline 62533 o-Anisidine 90040 Asbestos 1332214 Benzene (including benzene from gasoline) 71432 Benzidine 92875 Benzotrichloride 98077 Benzyl chloride 100447 Biphenyl 92524 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) 117817 Bis(chloromethyl)ether 542881 Bromoform 75252 1,3-Butadiene 106990 Calcium cyanamide 156627 Captan 133062 Carbaryl 63252 Carbon disulfide 75150 Carbon tetrachloride 56235 Carbonyl sulfide 463581 Catechol 120809 Chloramben 133904 Chlordane 57749 Chlorine 7782505 Chloroacetic acid 79118 2-Chloroacetophenone 532274 Chlorobenzene 108907 Chlorobenzilate 510156 Chloroform 67663 Chloromethyl methyl ether 107302 Chloroprene 126998 Cresols/Cresylic acid (isomers and mixture) 1319773 o-Cresol 95487 m-Cresol 108394 p-Cresol 106445 Cumene 98828 2,4-D, salts and esters 94757 DDE 3547044 Diazomethane 334883 Dibenzofurans 132649 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96128 Dibutylphthalate 84742 1,4-Dichlorobenzene(p) 106467 3,3-Dichlorobenzidene 91941 Dichloroethyl ether (Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether) 111444 1,3-Dichloropropene 542756 Dichlorvos 62737 Diethanolamine 111422 N,N-Diethyl aniline (N,N-Dimethylaniline) 121697 List of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP)Pollutant Name CAS No. List of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP)

Diethyl sulfate 64675 3,3-Dimethoxybenzidine 119904 Dimethyl aminoazobenzene 60117 3,3'-Dimethyl benzidine 119937 Dimethyl carbamoyl chloride 79447 Dimethyl formamide 68122 1,1-Dimethyl hydrazine 57147 Dimethyl phthalate 131113 Dimethyl sulfate 77781 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol, and salts 534521 2,4-Dinitrophenol 51285 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 121142 1,4-Dioxane (1,4-Diethyleneoxide) 123911 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 122667 Epichlorohydrin (l-Chloro-2,3-epoxypropane) 106898 1,2-Epoxybutane 106887 Ethyl acrylate 140885 Ethyl benzene 100414 Ethyl carbamate (Urethane) 51796 Ethyl chloride (Chloroethane) 75003 Ethylene dibromide (Dibromoethane) 106934 Ethylene dichloride (1,2-Dichloroethane) 107062 Ethylene glycol 107211 Ethylene imine (Aziridine) 151564 Ethylene oxide 75218 Ethylene thiourea 96457 Ethylidene dichloride (1,1-Dichloroethane) 75343 Formaldehyde 50000 Heptachlor 76448 Hexachlorobenzene 118741 Hexachlorobutadiene 87683 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77474 Hexachloroethane 67721 Hexamethylene-1,6-diisocyanate 822060 Hexamethylphosphoramide 680319 Hexane 110543 Hydrazine 302012 Hydrochloric acid 7647010 Hydrogen fluoride (Hydrofluoric acid) 7664393 Hydrogen sulfide 7783064 Hydroquinone 123319 Isophorone 78591 Lindane (all isomers) 58899 Maleic anhydride 108316 Methanol 67561 Methoxychlor 72435 Methyl bromide (Bromomethane) 74839 Methyl chloride (Chloromethane) 74873 Methyl chloroform (1,1,1-Trichloroethane) 71556 Methyl hydrazine 60344 Methyl iodide (Iodomethane) 74884 Methyl isobutyl ketone (Hexone) 108101 Methyl isocyanate 624839 Methyl methacrylate 80626 Methyl tert butyl ether 1634044 4,4-Methylene bis(2-chloroaniline) 101144 Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane) 75092 Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) 101688 4,4'¬-Methylenedianiline 101779 Naphthalene 91203Pollutant Name CAS No. List of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP)

Nitrobenzene 98953 4-Nitrobiphenyl 92933 4-Nitrophenol 100027 2-Nitropropane 79469 N-Nitroso-N-methylurea 684935 N-Nitrosodimethylamine 62759 N-Nitrosomorpholine 59892 Parathion 56382 Pentachloronitrobenzene (Quintobenzene) 82688 Pentachlorophenol 87865 Phenol 108952 p-Phenylenediamine 106503 Phosgene 75445 Phosphine 7803512 Phosphorus 7723140 Phthalic anhydride 85449 Polychlorinated biphenyls (Aroclors) 1336363 1,3-Propane sultone 1120714 beta-Propiolactone 57578 Propionaldehyde 123386 Propoxur (Baygon) 114261 Propylene dichloride (1,2-Dichloropropane) 78875 Propylene oxide 75569 1,2-Propylenimine (2-Methyl aziridine) 75558 Quinoline 91225 Quinone 106514 Styrene 100425 Styrene oxide 96093 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin 1746016 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79345 Tetrachloroethylene (Perchloroethylene) 127184 Titanium tetrachloride 7550450 Toluene 108883 2,4-Toluene diamine 95807 2,4-Toluene diisocyanate 584849 o-Toluidine 95534 Toxaphene (chlorinated camphene) 8001352 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120821 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79005 Trichloroethylene 79016 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95954 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88062 Triethylamine 121448 Trifluralin 1582098 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 540841 Vinyl acetate 108054 Vinyl bromide 593602 Vinyl chloride 75014 Vinylidene chloride (1,1-Dichloroethylene) 75354 Xylenes (isomers and mixture) 1330207 o-Xylenes 95476 m-Xylenes 108383 p-Xylenes 106423 Antimony Compounds 0 Arsenic Compounds (inorganic including arsine) 0 Beryllium Compounds 0 Cadmium Compounds 0 Chromium Compounds 0 Cobalt Compounds 0 Coke Oven Emissions 0Pollutant Name CAS No. List of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP)

Cyanide Compounds 0 Glycol ethers 0 Lead Compounds 0 Manganese Compounds 0 Mercury Compounds 0 Fine mineral fibers 0 Nickel Compounds 0 Polycylic Organic Matter 0 Radionuclides (including radon) 0 Selenium Compounds 0

# Other ICR Response Info.DaveH.GamblePEConsultant—EnvironmentalPhillips661000SouthPineStPCBox1267,1228R8PoncaCity,OKLA74604phone580767.2862fax5807675583April9,2013MaryTomKissellCertifiedMailMailCodeEl43-01ReturnReceiptRequestedU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyResearchTrianglePark,NC27711Ms.Kissell,Off-SiteWasteandRecoveryOperations(OSWRO)InformationCollectionPhillips66Company,PoncaCityRefineryEnclosed,pleasefindthePhillips66Company’sPoncaCityRefineryresponsetotheAgency’sMarch11,2013114informationrequestregardingtheNationalEmissionsStandardsforHazardousAirPollutantsforOff-SiteWasteandRecoveryOperations(OSWRO).Pertheinstructions,thisresponseisbeingprovidedonorbeforeApril10,2013.PleasenotethatalthoughtherequestisdatedMarch11,2013,itwasnotreceivedbythefacilityuntilaweeklateronMarch18,2013.Thefacilityisprovidingtheinformationitcouldreasonablygatherinthethreeweekperiod.ThePoncaCityRefinerynotesthatwhileitisamajorfacilityforhazardousairpollutantsasthattermisusedintheCleanAirAct,itisexemptfrommostoftherequirementsoftherule.Thisisduetotheverysmallquantitiesofmaterialsitreceivesfromoff-sitesources(seeAppendix1ofthissubmittal).AdditionallythesematerialsareonlyreceivedfromotherPhillips66-ownedorcontractedfacilitiesandarelimitedtooil/watermixturesandoccasionallyoff-specrefinedpetroleumproducts.Thespecificquantityandnatureoftheoff-sitematerialsreceivedandtreatedatthePoncaCityRefineryarereflectedintheresponseprovided.However,manyofthequestionsincludedinthe114requestareobviouslygearedtotypicalrecoveryfacilitieswherelargerquantitiesarestoredandtreatedwithinoneormoreaffectedunits.WherethePoncaCityRefineryhasdeterminedthataquestionisnotapplicabletoouroperationswehavenotedthisinourresponse.Forexample,asnotedabove,thetotalmassofmaterialsreceivedon-siteannuallyislessthan1Mg,theregulatorythresholdfoundin40CFR63.680(d).Becauselessthan1Mgofmaterialsisreceivedon-site(SeeAppendix2ofthissubmittal),thePoncaCityRefineryis“exemptfromtherequirementsofSecs.63.682through63.699[sic]”.Hence,noneoftheunitsusedtostoreorrecyclethematerialsatthePoncaCityRefineryareconsideredOSRWOregulatedunits.ThefollowingisasummaryofthePoncaCityRefineryresponsesincludedinthetilesprovidedbytheAgency:Enclosure1.doc•CompletedEnc2.xlsx•OwnerInformationworksheet—completed•FacilityInformationworksheet—completedrows4through21.Rows23through43donotapply.•Remainingworksheets—BecausethePoncaCityrefineryisnotsubjecttotherequirementsof40CFR63.682through63.699,noinformationisavailableorprovidedfortheseworksheets.OSWROEnclosure2a.xls•Enclosure2Aworksheet—BecausethePoncaCityrefineryisnotsubjecttotherequirementsof40CFR63.682through63.699,noinformationisavailableorprovidedforthisworksheet.Phillips66’sapproachinansweringsuchquestionsisintendedtobeconsistentwiththeinstructionintherequestthatnoted:IfyourfacilitydoesnothaveOff-SiteWasteandRecoveryOperations,pleaserespondassoonaspossible.Wewillreviewthatinformationandrespondastowhetheryouneedtocompleteanyotherpartofthesurvey.PleasefeelfreetocontactNetaHercykat(580)767-4182ormyselfat(580)767-2862ifyouhavequestionsorneedadditionalinformation.Sincerely,jDaveH.GamblePEAPPENDIX140CFRPart63Subpart63Section63.680(d)40CFR60.680(d)Facility-wideexemption.Theowneroroperatorofaffectedsourcessubjecttothissubpartisexemptedfromtherequirementsof§63.682through63.699ofthissubpartinsituationswhenthetotalannualquantityoftheHAPthatiscontainedintheoff-sitematerialreceivedattheplantsiteislessthan1megagramperyear.Foraplantsitetobeexemptedundertheprovisionsofthisparagraph(d),theowneroroperatormustmeettherequirementsinparagraphs(d)(1)through(d)(3)ofthissection.(1)TheowneroroperatormustprepareaninitialdeterminationofthetotalannualHAPquantityintheoffsitematerialreceivedattheplantsite.ThisdeterminationisbasedonthetotalquantityoftheHAPlistedinTable1ofthissubpartasdeterminedatthepointof-deliveryforeachoffsitematerialstream.(2)Theowneroroperatormustprepareanewdeterminationwhenevertheextentofchangestothequantityorcompositionoftheoff-sitematerialreceivedattheplantsitecouldcausethetotalannualHAPquantityintheoffsitematerialreceivedattheplantsitetoexceedthelimitof1megagramperyear.(3)Theowneroroperatormustmaintaindocumentationtosupporttheowner’soroperator’sdeterminationofthetotalannualHAPquantityintheoff-sitematerialreceivedattheplantsite.ThisdocumentationmustincludethebasisanddatausedfordeterminingtheHAPcontentoftheoff-sitematerial.APPENDIX22012Off-SiteWasteHAPSCalculationsPhillips66PoncaCityRefineryTankWaterDrawWastewaterFromPhillips66Off-SiteTransportationFacilitiesProductTerminalWaterDrawAnalysis1HAPugiLWt.FractionBenzene14,0000.0000140Ethylbenzene2,9000.0000029Naphthalene(volatile)1,1000.0000011Naphthalene(semivolatile)7000.0000007Toluene27,0000.0000270o-Xylene4,5000.0000045m-Xyleneandp-Xylene10,0000.0000100Total0.00006022012Totalwastewater•volume27,384gallons•density8.34lbs/gallon•AnnualHAP=(27,834gallons)x(8.34lbs/gallon)x(0.0000602lbsHAP/lbwater)=13.75lbs=0.01megagramsJupiterWastewaterJupiterWastewaterAnalysis2HAPugILWt.Fraction2-Butanone(MEK)7.30.00000000732012TotalJupiterwastewater•volume=2,635,200gallons3•density8.34lbs/gallon•AnnualHAP=(2,635,200gallons)x(8.34lbs/gallon)x(0.0000000073lbsHAP/lbwater)=0.16lbs=0.00megagramsR&DWestWastewaterR&DWestWastewaterAnalysisHAPug/LWt.FractionSampleDate4Benzene3,2000.000003210/26/07Ethylbenzene6900.000000710/26/07Chloroform2800.000000310/26/07Naphthalene3000.000000310/29/07Toluene29,0000.000029010/26/07m-Xyleneandp-Xylene4,7000.000004710/26/07o-Xylene1,6000.000001610/26/07Total0.000039812/30/03sampledeterminedtobeworstcase(i.e.maximumHAPcontent).27/30/07sampledeterminedtobeworstcase(i.e.maximumHAPcontent).5GPM,24hoursperday,366daysperyear.Worstcase(i.e.maximumHAPcontent)42012TotalR&DWestwastewater•volume=1,755,000gallons5•density=8.34lbs/gallon•AnnualHAP=(1,755,000gallons)x(8.34lbs/gallon)x(0.0000602lbsHAP/lbwater)=582lbs=0.26megagramsTotalOft-SiteHAP•TankWaterDrawWastewaterfromPhillips66Off-SiteTransportationFacilities=0.01megagrams•JupiterWastewater=0.00megagrams•R&DWestWastewater=0.26megagrams•TotalOft-SiteWastewater=0.27megagrams<1megagram3.3GPM,24hoursperday,366daysperyear.