January 8, 2015

Exemption No. 11385A Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 0129

Mr. James T. Marsh Owner/Operator

HeliTek NW

3812 SW 195 th Terrace Beaverton, OR 97078

Dear Mr. Marsh:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions

and limitations.

By letter posted to the docket on August 3, 2015 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of HeliTek NW (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an

amendment to your current exemption . That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91 .7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data

collection. You requested an amendm ent to add the DJI Spreading Wings S 1000 and closed

set motion picture and television filming.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granti ng the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this pe tit ion would be detrimental to the petitioner

. T he

unmanned aircraft authorized in the original grant are comparable in type, size, weight, speed and operating capabilities to those in this petition

.2

Airworthiness Certification

In accordance with the statutory criteria provided in Section 333 of Public Law 112

− 95 in

reference to 49 U.S.C. § 44704, and in consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation

h as determined that this aircraft meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA

finds that relief from 14 CFR part 21, C ertification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H

— Airworthiness Certificates , and any associated noise certification a nd testing requirements of part 36, is not necessary.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the ju stification for the issuance of Exemption No. 11385 remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained

in 49 U.S.C

. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is granted an amendment to add new aircraft and closed

- set motion picture and television filming to its UAS operations.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original ex emption.

Conditions and Limitations

All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 11385 remain in effect except as follows. Condition No. 1 has been updated to reflect the additional aircraft , and Condition No. 2 has been updated to permit closed

- set motion picture and television filming.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of th is exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the DJI Spreading Wings S 1000 and DJI Inspire 1 when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this exemption.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed

- set motion picture and television filming are permitted.3

T his exemption terminates on April 30, 2017 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Director, Flight Standards Service