alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2411 

To suspend temporarily the duty on lightweight digital camera lenses 

measuring approximately 55 mm or more. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on lightweight digital 

camera lenses measuring approximately 55 mm or more. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIGHTWEIGHT DIGITAL CAMERA LENSES MEAS4 URING APPROXIMATELY 55 MM OR MORE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2411 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Lenses designed for digital 

cameras, the foregoing with a 

focal length measuring approximately 55 mm or more 

but not over 200 mm and 

weighing between 329 and 

339 g (provided for in subheading 9002.11.90) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           24123
<SECURITIES>                                    523039
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2274534
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (613066)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                453612
<PP&E>                                          216744
<DEPRECIATION>                                (164360)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2368526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1116942
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         47427
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1188115
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2368526
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1057377
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1121144
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               84736
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (63767)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (63767)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (63767)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,367
<SECURITIES>                                     2,724
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,541
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,074
<INVENTORY>                                     24,293
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,492
<PP&E>                                         152,711
<DEPRECIATION>                                  53,882
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 181,331
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,832
<BONDS>                                         90,467
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,191
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   181,331
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               477,047
<CGS>                                          339,308
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  466,066
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,806
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    175
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (150)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 25
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        25
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Reportof Datalink Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Greg R. Meland, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Greg R. Meland                    |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   |
| Greg  R. Meland                        |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                   |
| Dated:  March 21, 2003            |

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Reportof Datalink Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel J. Kinsella, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Daniel J. Kinsella                               |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                  |
| Daniel  J. Kinsella                                   |
| Vice  President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                                  |
| Dated:   March 21, 2003                          |

 

----
**Exhibit
      32.2**


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the quarterly report of Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jon R. Ansari, Senior
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(2)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





(3)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.











Date:
      August 14, 2006





/s/
      Jon R. Ansari


Jon
      R.
      Ansari


Senior
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer








30
No. 48255.

#### Protests 93783-K, etc., of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The court, in accordance with the established facts, held the paperweights and tape measures in question to be household utensils and therefore dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339, following *Woolworth*v. *United States*(26 C. C. P. A. 221, C. A. D. 20) and Abstract 43372, respectively. The brass base shells, following *New York Merchandise Co.*v. *United States*(8 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 607), were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 353 as parts of articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                     COMPUTER ACCESS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

                                  CERTIFICATION

     In  connection  with the  periodic  report of  Computer  Access  Technology
Corporation  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  I, Carmine J.
Napolitano,  President,  Chief  Financial  Officer and Secretary of the Company,
hereby  certify as of the date hereof,  solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter
63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

     This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,  "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


Date: May 13, 2004                        By: /s/ CARMINE J. NAPOLITANO
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Carmine J. Napolitano
                                              President, Chief Financial Officer
                                              and Secretary
#### Franklin Simon & Co. *v.*United States

No. 6958.

Entry No. 719121; 701426.

Invoices dated Warminster, England, August 22, 1941, etc.

Certified August 23, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., October 11, 1941, etc.

(Decided March 4, 1947)

*Lane & Wallace*and *Lane, Young & Fox*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### Ex parte David Wayne WILHELM.

No. 2-97-379-CR.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

Aug. 31, 1998.

Rehearing Overruled Oct. 22, 1998.

Melvyn Carson Bruder, Dallas, for appellant.

Tim Curry, Criminal Dist. Atty., Charles M. Mallín, David M. Curl, Trent Loftin, Alana Frankfather, Asst. Criminal Dist., Fort Worth, for appellee.

*660Before CAYCE, C.J., and RICHARDS and BRIGHAM, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

RICHARDS, Justice.

This is an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s decision denying pre-trial relief on a claim of collateral estoppel. Appellant’s specific complaint is that the trial court was required to grant the relief he requested in a pre-trial writ of habeas corpus; to wit: find that the State was collaterally estopped from relitigating the issue of the legality of the traffic stop which gave rise to appellant’s arrest for the offense of driving while intoxicated.

Appellant argues that because an administrative law judge earlier found that the traffic stop was illegal, the State was barred from relitigating that issue as part of its subsequent DWI prosecution. We affirm.

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has recently held that although appellate courts have the jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeals from habeas writs, with a few notable exceptions, such as claims of double jeopardy which, if sustained, bar prosecution, many issues raised in pre-trial appeals have adequate remedies by direct appeal upon final conviction, such that the claims are not cognizable basis for relief via pre-trial habeas appeal. *See Ex Parte McCullough,*966 S.W.2d 529, 530 (Tex.Crim.App.1998). Here, the possibility that appellant may be acquitted, coupled with the fact that it is possible the trial judge could change his ruling during subsequent proceedings in the case, requires the conclusion that appellant’s claim does not present a cognizable ground for pre-trial relief.2 Moreover, even if the claim could properly be presented in a pre-trial appeal, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ decisions in *State v. Aguilar,*947 S.W.2d 257, 260 (Tex.Crim.App.1997), and *State v. Brabson,*966 S.W.2d 493, 496-97 (Tex.Crim.App.1998), where the court found that collateral estoppel principles did not prevent the State from relitigating an adverse ruling by an administrative judge, also have equal application in our case. Appellant’s point is overruled.

The trial court’s order denying appellant’s requested relief is affirmed.

1

. *See*Tex.R.App. P. 47.1.

2

. In *Ex parte Serna,*957 S.W.2d 598 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1997, pet. filed), this Court addressed a collateral estoppel issue in the context of a pretrial habeas appeal in which the defendant advanced both a double jeopardy claim and a collateral estoppel claim. Because double jeopardy claims must be addressed by appellate courts in interlocutory appeals, we reached the merits of both the double jeopardy claim and the collateral estoppel contention. Here, appellant does not claim that the State is barred from retrying him, only that it cannot relitigate an issue previously litigated. Appellant has an adequate remedy by appeal should he be convicted.
Project Review for Heritage Resources under the Terms of the 2004
 

Programmatic Agreement among the USFS R6, ACHP, and SHPO
 

. June 2004 

Forest: Rogue River--Siskiyou 

Ranger District: Wild Rivers 

County: Josephine 

Undertaking/Project 

Name 

Butcher Knife I Slate Timber Sale Project 

USGS Quads: Onion Mountain, Selma 

Stipulation III (A)l Undertaking meets the criteria listed in Appendix A of the PA 

Date: Determinations, including any inspection or monitoring requirements, will 

be submitted to the Forest Specialist. 

Stipulation III(A)2 Undertaking meets the criteria listed in Appendix B of the PA. 

Date: Determinations, including any inspection or monitoring requirements, will 

be submitted to the Forest Specialist. 

Stipulation III(A)3 Undertaking meets the criteria listed in Appendix C (ExemptINonundertaking). Submitted to NEPA file only. 

Stipulation III (B)l Undertaking meets the criteria in the PA for a No Historic Properties 

Affected determination. Forest-level review. 

X Stipulation III(B)2 Undertaking meets the criteria in the PA fo~ Historic Properties Avoided 

determination. Forest-level review. 

Stipulation III(B)4 No Historic Properties Affected: The Forest finds that there are historic 

properties but undertaking will have no effect on them as defined by 36 

CFR 800.16(i). SHPO review period (30-day) required. 

Stipulation III(B)5 

Date: 

No Adverse Effect: The Forest finds that there are historic properties but 

undertaking will have no adverse effect on them as defined by 36 CFR 

800.16(i). SHPO review period (30-day) required. 

Stipulation III(B)6 

Date: 

Historic Properties Adversely Affected: The Forest shall consult according 

to 36 CFR 800.5. 

By signing this document, the Forest Specialist certifies that for this project the Forest complies with 

Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, under the terms of the 2004 Programmatic 

Agreement (PA) for the State of Oregon. This form shall be kept on file as supporting documentation 

For SHPO USE: For "No Historic Properties Affected" and "No Adverse Effect", please indicate your 

opinion of our determination by marking the appropriate box below, sign and return this form to the Forest. 

I concur 

I do not concur, because in my opinion 

Date Received 

SHPO Bibliographic Number:
# C_2012355EN.01001001.xml

| 17.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/10

---

Action brought on 7 September 2012 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-411/12)

2012/C 355/16

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky, S. Thomas and D. Grespan, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the measures necessary to abolish the State aid scheme found to be unlawful and incompatible with the common market by Commission Decision 2011/746/EU of 23 February 2011 on State aid granted by Italy to Portovesme Srl, ILA SpA, Eurallumina SpA and Syndial SpA (State aid measures C 38/B/2004 (ex NN 58/2004) and C 13/2006 (ex N 587/2005) (notified under document C(2011) 956 on 24 February 2012 and published in OJ 2011 L 309, pp. 1 to 22), the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3, 4 and 5 of that decision and under the TFEU Treaty; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, all the measures necessary to abolish the State aid scheme found to be unlawful and incompatible with the common market by Commission Decision 2011/746/EU of 23 February 2011 on State aid granted by Italy to Portovesme Srl, ILA SpA, Eurallumina SpA and Syndial SpA (State aid measures C 38/B/2004 (ex NN 58/2004) and C 13/2006 (ex N 587/2005) (notified under document C(2011) 956 on 24 February 2012 and published in OJ 2011 L 309, pp. 1 to 22), the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3, 4 and 5 of that decision and under the TFEU Treaty;

| — | Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period allowed by the decision for recovery of the State aid declared unlawful expired on 24 June 2011. Furthermore, the defendant was required to notify the Commission, by 24 April 2001, of the total amount of aid to be recovered and the measures taken and planned to comply with the decision.

At the date on which the present proceedings were brought, the defendant had not yet adopted the measures necessary to recover the aid granted to the recipient undertakings or communicated to the Commission all the information requested.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  February 27, 2009
    /s/ John YearwoodJohn YearwoodChief Executive Officer,

President and Chief Operating OfficerDate:  February 27, 2009
    /s/ Margaret K. DormanMargaret K. DormanExecutive Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer   110
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2380 

To reduce temporarily the duty on ferroniobium. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2012 

Mr. ROCKEFELLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on ferroniobium. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FERRONIOBIUM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Ferroniobium (provided for 

in subheading 7202.93.80) ... 4.6% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2380 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Appendix 10Refrigerant Capacities0.0500.01000.01500.02000.02500.03000.03500.0-40 -30 -20 -10 0Evaporating Temperature (degC)

Capacity (kJ/m^3)R442AR404AR407A