alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 3.15

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

      K-111 DIRECTORY CORPORATION, a corporation organized and existing under
and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation"),

      DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

      FIRST: That the Board of Directors of the Corporation duly adopted
resolutions setting forth and declaring advisable a proposed amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation of said Corporation:

            RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of this Corporation
            be amended by changing the First Article so that, as amended, said
            Article shall be and read as follows: "The name of the Corporation
            is PRIMEDIA Information Inc.".

      SECOND: That by written consent, filed with the minutes of the
Corporation, the sole stockholder approved said amendment in accordance with the
provisions of Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

      THIRD: That the aforesaid amendment to the Corporation's Certificate of
Incorporation was duly adopted in accordance with the applicable provisions of
Section 242 and Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said K-III Directory Corporation has caused this
Certificate to be executed by Beverly Chell its authorized officer, on this 14th
day of November, 1997.


                                              By
                                             Name: Beverly C. Chell
                                             Title: Vice Chairman & Secretary
89–008

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 107–50

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 503, THE

UNBORN VICTIMS OF VIOLENCE ACT OF 2001

APRIL 24, 2001.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 119]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 119, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 503, the Unborn

Victims of Violence Act of 2001, under a modified closed rule. The

rule provides two hours of debate equally divided and controlled by

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

the Judiciary.

The rule provides that the amendment printed in this report

shall be considered as adopted. The rule also makes in order the

amendment printed in the Congressional Record and numbered 1,

if offered by Representative Lofgren of California or her designee,

which shall be considered as read and shall be separately debatable

for one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and

an opponent. Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

SUMMARY OF AMENDMENTS MADE IN ORDER UNDER THE RULE

Amendment to be Considered as Adopted—Makes a technical

change to the title of the new section in the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

Lofgren/Conyers—Amendment in the nature of a substitute

printed in the Congressional Record. Establishes a new federal

crime for any violent or assaultive conduct against a pregnant

woman that interrupts or terminates her pregnancy and makes any

interruption punishable by a fine and imprisonment up to twenty

2

years but, if the pregnancy is terminated, punishable by a fine and

imprisonment up to life.

TEXT OF AMENDMENT TO BE CONSIDERED AS ADOPTED

Page 5, strike line 9 and insert the following:

‘‘§ 919a. Art. 119a. Causing death of or bodily injury to unborn children

Page 7, strike the matter after line 11 and insert the following:

‘‘919a. Art. 119a. Causing death of or bodily injury to unborn children.’’.

Æ
Before the Second Division,

January 31, 1939

No. 40564.

#### Protest 963855-G of Rolls Razor, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of machines and parts similar to those the subject of *Lee*v. *United States*(T. D. 49358). The claim at *27}í*percent under paragraph 372 was therefore sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2244 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2244

     To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to assist in the 
identification of unclaimed and abandoned human remains to determine if 
 any such remains are eligible for burial in a national cemetery, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 28, 2012

Mr. Portman (for himself and Mr. Begich) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to assist in the 
identification of unclaimed and abandoned human remains to determine if 
 any such remains are eligible for burial in a national cemetery, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Missing in America Act of 
2012''.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    Congress recognizes the tireless work and dedication of the members 
of the Missing in America Project, in conjunction with numerous 
veterans service organizations, in identifying the unclaimed remains of 
veterans.

SEC. 3. IDENTIFICATION OF UNCLAIMED AND ABANDONED HUMAN REMAINS.

    (a) Identification of Unclaimed or Abandoned Human Remains.--The 
Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall cooperate with veterans service 
organizations to assist entities in possession of unclaimed or 
abandoned human remains in determining if any such remains are the 
remains of veterans or other individuals eligible for burial in a 
national cemetery.
    (b) Burial of Unclaimed or Abandoned Human Remains.--If the 
Secretary determines that any unclaimed or abandoned human remains are 
the remains of a person who is eligible for burial in an open national 
cemetery under the control of the National Cemetery Administration 
under section 2402 of title 38, United States Code, the Secretary shall 
provide for the burial of the remains and cover the cost of the burial 
of the remains and the cost of preparing the remains and transporting 
them to the place of burial, if the Secretary determines, with respect 
to the remains--
            (1) that there is no next of kin or other person claiming 
        the remains; and
            (2) that there are not available other sufficient resources 
        to cover burial and funeral expenses.
    (c) Creation of National Database.--The Secretary shall establish a 
database in which the Secretary shall enter the names of any veteran or 
other individual identified pursuant to subsection (a). The Secretary 
shall ensure that the database is publicly accessible.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rapid Bio Tests Corporation a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Paul R. Hemmes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Rapid Bio Tests Corporation, and will be retained by Rapid Bio Tests
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.


/s/ Paul R. Hemmes
--------------------------
Paul R. Hemmes
Chief Financial Officer
October 20, 2003
No. 40511.

#### Protest 960163-G of Durbrow & Hearne (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It appeared that the machine in question is used for cutting paper or fabrics and that the function of the electric motor accompanying the machine is to furnish motive power. On the authority of *United States*v. *Dryden Rubber Co.*(22 C. C. P. A. 51, T. D. 47050) it was held that the machine in question was properly classified at 35 percent under paragraph 353.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
China Natural Gas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,  Bode Xu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: February    , 2012



| | /s/ Bode Xu                                        
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Bode Xu, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
From: Withey, Charlotte [ mailto:Withey.Charlotte@epa.gov ]

Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 3:46 PM

To: Withey, Charlotte; George Tsiolis

Cc: 'Giff, Jennifer'

Subject: RE: Arizona RHR FIP

- Tribal Consultation Between EPA, SRPMIC and

PCC

George and Jennifer,

Happy New Year! I just wanted to check in and see whether your clients had any

additional information they wished to share with EPA prior to our proposal.

Pleas e let me know at your earliest convenience if we can expect to receive

anything in the near future.

Thanks,

Charlotte

Charlotte Withey

Office of Regional Counsel

U.S. EPA Region 9

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

Tel: (415) 972

- 3915

Fax: (415) 947

- 3570

withey.charlotte@epa.gov
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of BigString  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report"), I,
Darin M. Myman,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C.  Section 78m or 78o(d),
      and,

(2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.

Dated: May 14, 2007                         /s/ Darin M. Myman
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Darin M. Myman
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shandong Zhouyuan Seed and Nursery Co., Ltd (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief Financial Officer, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:  May  19, 2009                    /s/ Yiqun Liu ------------------------------- Yiqun Liu, CFO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> 0

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               27,305,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   657,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,949,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,974,000
<PP&E>                                       8,002,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,772,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,735,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,238,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       545,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,183,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,735,000
<SALES>                                     81,812,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            81,812,000
<CGS>                                       78,558,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               82,391,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               773,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,593,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,454,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,339,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (100,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,299)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,299,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.63)


</TABLE>
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2210 

To provide that Members of Congress shall not receive a cost of living 

adjustment in pay during 2013. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 20, 2012 

Mr. TESTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide that Members of Congress shall not receive a 

cost of living adjustment in pay during 2013. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Pay Raise for Con5 gress Act of 2012’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NO COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT IN PAY OF MEM7 BERS OF CONGRESS. 

8 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no ad9 justment shall be made under section 601(a) of the Legis10 lative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31) (relating 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2210 IS

1 to cost of living adjustments for Members of Congress) 

2 during 2013. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 146 (Wednesday, July 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40810-40811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19973]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-424-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

July 24, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 22, 1997, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
(Koch) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become effective 
August 22, 1997:

Ninth Revised Sheet No. 2705
Eighth Revised Sheet No. 2706
1st Rev Fifth Revised Sheet No. 2707

    Koch states the above referenced tariff sheets are being filed to 
modify section 20.1(D) of the General Terms and Conditions to remove 
prior period adjustments language from its cash-in/cash-out procedures.
    Koch also states that copies of the filing have been served upon 
each affected customer, state commissions, and other interested 
parties.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's rules 
and regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
by Section 154.210 of the Commission's rules and regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a part must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public

[[Page 40811]]

inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-19973 Filed 7-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Helbros Watch Co. et al. *v.*United States

No. 7922.

Entry No. 716688, etc.

(Decided December 15, 1950)

*Lane, Young & Fox (William H. Fox*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrenoe, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the merchandise the subject of these appeals are the same in all material respects as those decided in *474
      *United States*v. *Gothic Watch Co.,*23 Cust. Ct. 235, Reap. Dec. 7712, affirming the judgment in *Gothic Watch Co.*v. *United States,*19 Cust. Ct. 309, Reap. Dec. 7438, and that the record in Reap. Dec. 7712, *supra,*may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts, I find that the attempted appraisement embodied in the second return of value by the appraiser of the merchandise covered by each of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the annexed schedule, which is marked “A” and made a part of this decision, was illegal, null, and void, and that the appraiser’s original return of value in each case, as reported by him to the collector of customs, constituted his appraisal of the merchandise pursuant to section 500 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1500), and was final and conclusive in the absence of any appeal pursuant to section 501 of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1501).

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 42182.

#### Protests 722844-G, etc., of Antolini & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and *on*the.authority of Abstract 41794 the protests were sustained.
No. 5816.

#### ROBERT BENSBERG vs. NEW ORLEANS TERMINAL COMPANY, ET AL.

Syllabus.

Where there is no conflict of testimony the matter is solely one of appreciating the effect to be given to the evidence as adduced ; and there is no occasion for applying the rule relative to the weight to be given to the finding of the trial •Judge in cases of conflicting testimony.

Appeal from the 28th Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson, No. 1310, Honorable P. E. Edrington, Judge.

Conrad A. Buckler, for plaintiff and appellee.

Poster, Milling, Brian & Saal, Dufour & Dufour, George Janvier, for defendant and appellant.

*2His Honor, EMILE GODCHAUX,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

This suit is for the recovery of the value of a cow that was killed by a passenger train of one of the defendants; there was judgment below for plaintiff against said defendant, and the latter appealed.

There is no substantial conflict in the evidence, and our appreciation thereof leads, us to the conclusion that the trial Court erred in holding appellant liable, the latter having’ affirmatively established, as it was bound to do, its freedom from negligence in the premises.

Plaintiff’s only witness to the accident viewed it at a distance of four or five hundred feet, and all he states is that his attention having been directed to the matter by the cries of some children, he saw the cow run along the track some fifteen or twenty feet before it was struck by the engine. On behalf of appellant, the fireman and engineer of the train testify that the cow, which had been standing motionless some twenty-five feet from the track, suddenly started to attempt to cross it when the train was about sixty feet away, and that it was impossible to stop the train, which was going at the rate of eight miles an hour, in time to avert the accident, though the emergency brakes'were promptly applied in .an effort to do so, the engineer testifying (and he is no where contradicted) that in an emergency the shortest space within which the engine, drawing four coaches and running at the rate of eight miles an hour, could have been stopped, would be .about two hundred feet.

With the record in this condition it is apparent that the defendant has sustained the burden of provng its freedom from negligence, and that the trial Court erred in its appreciation of the legal effect of the facts disclosed thereby.

*3Opinion and decree, November 10, 1913.

It is accordingly oruered that the judgment appealed from be reversed and that plaintiff’s suit be dismissed Insofar as the appellant is concerned, at plaintiff’s costs, In both Courts.

Ee versed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report ofSouth Shore Resources Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2008as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,Michael Kabin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   
| | 2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |   

Dated this 14thday of August, 2008.

MICHAEL KABINMichael KabinChief Executive Officer

























---