alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20259]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Advisory Committee on Military Personnel Testing

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Defense Advisory Committee on Military Personnel Testing is 
scheduled to be held from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on September 11, 1997 
and from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on September 12, 1997. The meeting will 
be held at The Camberley Gunter Hotel. The purpose of the meeting is to 
review planned changes and progress in developing paper-and-pencil and 
computerized enlistment tests and renorming of the tests. Persons 
desiring to make oral presentations or submit written statements for 
consideration at the Committee meeting must contact Dr. Jane M. 
Arabian, Assistant Director, Accession Policy, Office of the Assistant 
Secretary of Defense (Force Management Policy), Room 2B271, The 
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000, telephone (703) 697-9271, no later 
than August 25, 1997.

    Dated: July 28, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-20259 Filed 7-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
No. 47773.

#### Protests 81430-K, etc., of John H. Burns Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Pacific Trading Co.*v. *United States*(8 Cust. Ct. 221, C. D. 610), the frozen frogs’ legs in question were held dutiable at 10 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1558, less 20 percent in accordance with the Cuban Trade Agreement, T. D. 47232.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND 1999, AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
CASH FLOWS FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       5,784,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,078,948
<ALLOWANCES>                                   149,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,229,546
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,600,470
<PP&E>                                       2,269,608
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,175,901
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,483,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,666,787
<BONDS>                                        236,590
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,718
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,579,883
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,483,260
<SALES>                                     19,027,446
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,027,446
<CGS>                                       12,398,560
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,398,560
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                19,913
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,805
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,075,421
<INCOME-TAX>                                   750,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,325,421
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,325,421
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56


</TABLE>
No. 96-5064.

#### Jones *v.*Page, Warden, et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2187 

To remove the sunset date for amendments to the Small Business Investment 

Act of 1958, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2012 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself and Ms. LANDRIEU) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business 

and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To remove the sunset date for amendments to the Small 

Business Investment Act of 1958, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF SUNSET DATES FOR CERTAIN 

4 PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL BUSINESS IN5 VESTMENT ACT OF 1958. 

6 (a) MAXIMUM BOND AMOUNT.—Section 411(a)(1) of 

7 the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 

8 694b(a)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘does not exceed’’ and 

9 all that follows and inserting ‘‘does not exceed 

10 $5,000,000.’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2187 IS

1 (b) DENIAL OF LIABILITY.—Section 411(e)(2) of the 

2 Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 

3 694b(e)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘bonds exceeds’’ and 

4 all that follows and inserting ‘‘bonds exceeds 

5 $5,000,000,’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of USIP.Com, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kathy Christopher,Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, asadopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of my knowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Kathy Christopher      |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Kathy Christopher          |
| Controller, USIP.Com, Inc. |
|                       |
| May 11, 2004               |

 

 

USIP.Com, Inc. does not have a“Chief Financial Officer,” Kathy Christopher is the principal financial andaccounting officer.

 

----
#### In the Matter of Patrice Rozenbaum et al., Respondents, v Desert Palace, Inc., Appellant, et al., Respondents.

[611 NYS2d 184]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered October 26, 1993, which denied respondent-appellant’s motion for vacatur of a temporary restraining order and dismissal of this special proceeding, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In *Desert Palace v Rozenbaum*(192 AD2d 340, *lv denied*82 NY2d 652), this Court decided that attachment of the subject bank account affords quasi in rem jurisdiction over the judgment debtor, and rejected the argument that the bank had any obligation to prevent the judgment debtor from staking money from the subject account on gambling. In the instant action, the issue is the precise allocation of interest in the account among the judgment debtor, whom this Court has held to have an interest in the account *(supra)*and two relatives who allegedly also have an interest in the same account. Accordingly, the two cases do not have the same "focus” *(Richards v Estate of Kaskel,*169 AD2d 111, 120, *lv dismissed in part and denied in part*78 NY2d 1042), and the prior action lacks the identity with the instant proceeding necessary to application of the doctrine of res judicata and collateral estoppel *(see, Ryan v New York Tel. Co.,*62 NY2d 494, 500).

We have considered the respondent’s remaining arguments, and find them to be without merit. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Kupferman, Asch, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
EX-10.1






November 8, 2007



Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.


Rembrandt Tower


Amstelplein 1


1096 HA Amsterdam,


The Netherlands




	 	 	Re: Amendment to the Governance Agreement by and between Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
(“Purchaser”) and MedQuist Inc. (the “Company”) dated May 22, 2000 (the “Governance
Agreement”)






	 	 	Ladies and Gentleman:





This letter constitutes an amendment to the Governance Agreement. The Governance Agreement shall
be amended as follows:




	 	•	 	A new Section 3.01(g) is hereby added to the Governance Agreement to read as follows:





If the number of directors constituting the whole Board of Directors
shall be fixed at seven directors and Purchaser and its Subsidiaries
shall beneficially own, in the aggregate, at least a majority of the
outstanding Voting Stock, the Board of Directors shall consist of four
Purchaser Directors and three Independent Directors.




	 	•	 	A new sentence is added to the end of Section 3.4(a) to read as follows:





Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, in the
event that at any time there shall be no Independent Directors on the
Board of Directors, whether by reason of death, resignation,
retirement, disqualification, removal from office or other causes,
such vacancies shall be filled by an affirmative vote of the remaining
directors as provided in the by-laws.



Except as amended hereby, all of the terms and provisions of the Governance Agreement shall remain
in full force and effect.



Please indicate your agreement with the above amendment by signing where indicated below and
returning one copy of this letter amendment to MedQuist Inc., 1000 Bishops Gate Blvd., Suite 300,
Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054, USA, Attention: General Counsel. All capitalized terms not defined
herein shall have the same meanings as given to them in the Governance Agreement. Pursuant to the
terms of the Governance Agreement, this letter amendment has been approved by the Supervisory
Committee and will be effective as of the date it is executed by Purchaser as indicated below.



	 	 	 
	
 
	 	Sincerely,

MedQuist Inc.

By: /s/ Howard S. Hoffmann
	
 
	 	 
	
 
	 	Howard S. Hoffmann, CEO & President
	Agreed by:

	 	

	Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.

	By: /s/ Stephen H. Rusckowski

	 

	Stephen H. Rusckowski

	Member, Royal Philips Board of

	Management (Medical Systems)

	Date: November 8, 2007
EXHIBIT 10.41
                                                                   -------------





29 March 2005





Mr. William B. Danzell Nestor, Inc.
400 Massasoit Avenue, Suite 200
East Providence, RI  02914


Dear Mr. Danzell:

Pursuant to Section 3.2 of your  Employment  Agreement  with Nestor,  Inc.  (the
"Company"), the Compensation Committee has set your bonus targets for 2005.

Your  bonus  for  2005  shall  be 1.5% of the  Company's  2005  earnings  before
interest,   taxes,   depreciation  and   amortization,   as  determined  by  the
Compensation Committee;  provided, however, that if the Company's net income for
2005 exceeds  $500,000,  your bonus for 2005 shall be 3.0% of the Company's 2005
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, as determined by
the Compensation Committee.


Very truly yours,



/s/ Robert G. Flanders, Jr.
-----------------------------------
Robert G. Flanders, Jr.
Chairman, Compensation Committee
----

----

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  August 14, 2012 |   |   /s/ Samuel W. Fairchild                |
|-----------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                              |   | Samuel W. Fairchild                           |
|                              |   | President and Interim Chief Financial Officer |
|                              |   | (principal executive and financial officer)   |

----

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2269 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2269

                 To permit voluntary economic activity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 2012

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 To permit voluntary economic activity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Anti-Trust Freedom Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. VOLUNTARY ECONOMIC COORDINATION BY INDIVIDUALS.

    The Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. 1 et seq.), the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 
12 et seq.), and section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 
U.S.C. 45) shall not be construed to prohibit, ban, or otherwise extend 
to any voluntary economic coordination, cooperation, agreement, or 
other association, compact, contract, or covenant entered into by or 
between any individual or group of individuals.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark Hart, Appellant.

[699 NYS2d 877]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosenzweig, J.), rendered August 12, 1996, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant did not meet his burden of establishing the need for disclosure at the trial of the identity of the confidential informant *(see, People v Goggins,*34 NY2d 163, *cert denied*419 US 1012).

*326The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit (see, *Oregon v Kennedy,*456 US 667; *People v Kurtz,*51 NY2d 380, 386, *cert denied*451 US 911; *People v Key, 45*NY2d 111, 119; *Matter of Roman v Brown,*175 AD2d 899; *People v Zagarino,*74 AD2d 115). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
No. M-67.

No. M-68.

No. M-69.

#### Williams *v.*Borg *&*Warner Automotive Electronics & Mechanical Systems Corp.; Babigian *v.*Rehnquist, Chief Justice of the United States, et al.; and Rowls *v.*Runyon, Postmaster General.

Motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari out of time denied.
#### Oviatt’s *v.*United States

No. 6919.

Entry No. 5074.

Invoice dated London, England, January 15, 1941.

Certified January 17, 1941.^

Entered at Los Angeles, Calif., April 5, 1941.

(Decided February 26, 1947)

*Lawrence, Tuttle & Harper (Frank L. Lawrence*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*411Olivee, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the entered values.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.6    
    


 
 

AGREEMENT    
    


        The undersigned hereby agrees that, if BG Medicine, Inc. (the "Company") does not complete a financing transaction of at least $3,000,000 of the type currently
contemplated by the Company's Board of Directors (such as an initial public offering, a venture debt financing or other significant equity or debt financing with institutional investors) on or before
October 26, 2007, then the undersigned will make available to the Company, immediately upon the Company's request, an amount of cash, up to a maximum of $3,000,000, sufficient to fund the
Company's operations through the period ending on March 31, 2008. Such funding will be made available by each of the undersigned, severally, in the percentages set forth on  Exhibit A attached
hereto. Any funds actually provided to the Company hereunder will be evidenced by a series of promissory notes which will be
repayable on June 30, 2008 and, if not repaid on that date, shall thereafter be immediately evidenced by a series of demand notes for the aggregate amount actually provided to the Company
hereunder. Any promissory or demand notes issued by the Company pursuant to this agreement will be on current market terms. Each of the undersigned represents that this is a legally binding and
enforceable obligation. 


        EXECUTED
as of this 30th day of September, 2007. 



	AGTC Advisors Fund, L.P.

Applied Genomic Technology Capital Fund, L.P.

NewcoGen Equity Investors LLC

NewcoGen-Elan LLC

NewcoGen-Long Reign Holding LLC

NewcoGen-PE LLC

ST NewcoGen LLC	 	 
	

On behalf of the above listed Flagship entities	
 	

/s/  NOUBAR AFEYAN      

	

Gilde Europe Food & Agribusiness Fund, B.V.	
 	

/s/  PIETER VAN DER MEER, PARTNER      

	

Stelios Papadopoulos	
 	

/s/  STELIOS PAPADOPOULOS      










 
 

EXHIBIT A    
    



	Investor
 
	 	% of

Commitment
	 	Amount

	AGTC Advisors Fund, L.P.

Applied Genomic Technology Capital Fund, L.P.

NewcoGen Equity Investors LLC

NewcoGen-Elan LLC

NewcoGen-Long Reign Holding LLC

NewcoGen-PE LLC

ST NewcoGen LLC	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
	 	

	Total Flagship Entities	 	52.0	%	 	1,560,000
	

Gilde Europe Food & Agribusiness Fund, B.V.	
 	

32.0	
%	
 	

960,000
	

Stelios Papadopoulos	
 	

16.0	
%	
 	

480,000
	 	 	
	 	

	 	 	100.0	%	$	3,000,000













QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.6


AGREEMENT

EXHIBIT A
OCT-22-2001 13:12 DOJ CIUIL DIV.APPEL.STAFF 202 514 9405 P.02/02 i TE STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT FILED April 6, 2001
No. 01-1370 CeEE-RM-98-440 AIR-CONDITIONING AND REFRIGERATION INSTITUTE; CARRIER CORPORATION; LENNOX IN'ERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED; NORDYNE INCORPORATED; RHEEM MFG COMPANY; THE TRANE COMPANY Petitioners
V. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondents

ORDER Petitioners have filed a motion to dismiss and a motion to suspend briefing. The Court suspends the briefing schedule pending resolution of the petition for reconsideration pending befoxe the DOE. Counsel are directed to file a status report thirty days from the date of this order and then every thirty days until disposition of the reconsideration, For the Court
- By Direction

,. ,,,/s/ Patricia S. Connor CLERK ;': ' ''' * 3'' OCT-22-2001 13:12 

### DOJ CIUIL DIU.APPEL.STAFF 202 514 941215 " !.lED STATES COURT 

## a: APPEALS FOR TIlE FOURnI erR.CUlT



### No. 01-1370 EE-RM-98-440 

### FILED April 

### 6. 2001

AlR.-CONDITIONING AND REFRlGEAATION INSTI'IUl'B; CARRIER CORPORATION; LENNOX IN'lERNATIOtW., INCORPORATeD; NORDYNE INCORPORATED; RHE.EM MFG C<J.fPANY; nm TRANE COMPANY 

### Petitionel:S
v. U.S. DEPAR'IMENI' OF ENERGY; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

### R.esponden'ts

ORDER 

### PetitioneIs have 

### filed a motion 

### to dismiss and 

### a**mo~ion** 

### to suspend**b~iefing.** 

### The COUIt 

### suspends the**b~iefing** 

### schedule 

## pending resolution of**~he** 

### petition fOI 

### xeconsidexation pending before the DOE. 

### Counsel aIe 

### directed to file 

### a**s~a~us** 

### l:epozt**~hiIty** 

### days**f~om** 

### the date of this oIder 

### and then every thil:1:y 

### days until 

### disposi1:ion of 

### the 

### reconsideration, FOI**~he** 

### Cou.rt • By 

### Direction

_**r"""'~** ",'.il

### {sl Patricia S. ConnOr**\::~**.. ·,,:I' '.', ,'."-_. _______**~**__ _ •**(~'** CLERK



## ..**~M' ~b:)** **~**

### I' ..
• I**.,~ .~~.**  :_ .': .. J" ..•. 

### P.02/02
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    DIRECT RESPONSE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Direct Response Financial Services,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Daniel Brandt, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Direct Response Financial Services, Inc. and will be retained by
Direct Response Financial Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Dated: June 16, 2006

                                                  /s/ Daniel Brandt
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name: Daniel Brandt
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer