alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10546 Conference Calendar

JAMES E. WOODS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus NAVARRO CTY, TEXAS, Corsicana, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - CONSOLIDATED WITH No. 96-10825
- - - - - - - - - - JAMES E. WOODS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DALLAS COUNTY JAIL, Nursing Department, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:95-CV-614-H USDC No. 3-95-CV-202
- - - - - - - - - - December 10, 1996 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.Nos. 96-10546 & 96-10825 - 2 -

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. PER CURIAM: * In No. 96-10546, James Woods, #654107, appeals from the district court’s dismissal as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (formerly § 1915(d)) of his civil rights complaint. Woods contends that he was wrongfully arrested and forced to plead guilty to forgery and that his probation was revoked as a result. We have reviewed the record and Woods’ brief and conclude that his appeal is frivolous because his § 1983 complaint is barred under Heck v. Humphrey , 114 S. Ct. 2364 (1994). In No. 96-10825, Woods appeals from the district court’s dismissal as frivolous of his civil rights complaint against the Dallas County Jail. Woods contends that he received inadequate treatment from a nurse at the Dallas County Jail. We have reviewed the record and Woods’ brief and conclude that this appeal also is frivolous because Woods allegations do not rise to the level of deliberate indifference. See Estelle v. Gamble , 429 U.S. 97, 104 (1976). We caution Woods that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Woods is further cautioned to review anyNos. 96-10546 & 96-10825 - 3 - pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. APPEALS DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with this Quarterly Report of Goldspring,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Steve  Parent,
Principal  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  certifies  to the  best  of his
knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


May 17, 2004                                    /s/ Steve Parent
                                                -------------------------------
                                                    Steve Parent
                                                    Principal Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          108175
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                108175
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  108175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            17357
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       90818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    108175
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 90513
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 46464
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  44049
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              44049
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     44049
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    11.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.67


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2366 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 370
112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2366

To extend student loan interest rates for undergraduate Federal Direct 
                            Stafford Loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2012

   Mr. Alexander (for himself, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Kyl, Mr. 
   Cornyn, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Barrasso, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. 
Blunt, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Johanns, Mr. Coats, and Mr. Isakson) introduced 
  the following bill; which was read twice and ordered placed on the 
                                calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend student loan interest rates for undergraduate Federal Direct 
                            Stafford Loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Interest Rate Reduction Act''.

SEC. 2. INTEREST RATE EXTENSION.

    Subparagraph (D) of section 455(b)(7) of the Higher Education Act 
of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(b)(7)(D)) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking 
        ``2012'' and inserting ``2013''; and
            (2) in clause (v), by striking ``2012'' and inserting 
        ``2013''.

SEC. 3. REPEALING PREVENTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH FUND.

    (a) In General.--Section 4002 of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 300u-11) is repealed.
    (b) Rescission of Unobligated Funds.--Of the funds made available 
by such section 4002, the unobligated balance is rescinded.

SEC. 4. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTORY PAY-AS-YOU-GO ACT OF 2010.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.
                                                       Calendar No. 370

112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2366

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To extend student loan interest rates for undergraduate Federal Direct 
                            Stafford Loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 25, 2012

             Read twice and ordered placed on the calendar
```
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 
  1)
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Emageon Inc. ;2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods
presented in this report;4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15
(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and
report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other




---



##### 



employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
 Date: August 9, 2006
    
    /s/ Charles A. Jett, Jr.Charles A. Jett, Jr.Chairman, Chief ExecutiveOfficer, and President(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2367 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2367

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To strike the word ``lunatic'' from Federal law, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``21st Century Language Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. MODERNIZATION OF LANGUAGE REFERRING TO PERSONS WHO ARE MENTALLY 
              ILL.

    (a) Words Denoting Number, Gender, and So Forth.--Section 1 of 
title 1, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and `lunatic'''; and
            (2) by striking ``lunatic,''.
    (b) Banking Law Provisions.--
            (1) Trust powers.--The first section of the Act entitled 
        ``An Act to place authority over the trust powers of national 
        banks in the Comptroller of the Currency'', approved September 
        28, 1962 (12 U.S.C. 92a), is amended--
                    (A) in subsection (a), by striking ``committee of 
                estates of lunatics,''; and
                    (B) in subsection (b), by striking ``committee of 
                estates of lunatics''.
            (2) Consolidation and mergers of banks.--The National Bank 
        Consolidation and Merger Act (12 U.S.C. 215 et seq.) is 
        amended--
                    (A) in section 2 (12 U.S.C. 215)--
                            (i) in subsection (e), by striking 
                        ``receiver, and committee of estates of 
                        lunatics'' and inserting ``and receiver''; and
                            (ii) in subsection (f), by striking 
                        ``receiver, or committee of estates of 
                        lunatics'' and inserting ``or receiver''; and
                    (B) in section 3 (12 U.S.C. 215a)--
                            (i) in subsection (e), by striking 
                        ``receiver, and committee of estates of 
                        lunatics'' and inserting ``and receiver''; and
                            (ii) in subsection (f), by striking 
                        ``receiver, or committee of estates of 
                        lunatics'' and inserting ``or receiver''.

            Passed the Senate May 23, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2367

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To strike the word ``lunatic'' from Federal law, and for other 
                               purposes.
```
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00299

- CR

A NTHONY S TEPHENS

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 485th District

Court

of Tarrant County ( 1678472 )

August 22, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Birdwell

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

Justice Wade Birdwell
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**§
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
      Annual Report of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the
      year ending January 31, 2007 (the “Report”), I Gary Pokrassa, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
      knowledge:





(1)                 The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)                 The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Gary Pokrassa


Gary
      Pokrassa


Chief
      Financial Officer





April  12,
      2007





77
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Planar Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 27, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven J. Buhaly, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




By:

/s/    STEVEN J.
BUHALYSteven J. Buhaly Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer





December 23, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20693]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition

Determination

    Notice is hereby given of the following determination: Pursuant to 
the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 
985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978 (43 F.R. 
13359, March 29, 1978), and Delegation Order No. 85-5 of June 27, 1985 
(50 F.R. 27393, July 2, 1985), I hereby determine that the objects to 
be included in the exhibit, ``Impressionist and Modern Masterpieces 
from the Collection of the Rudolf Staechelin Family Foundation of 
Basel, Switzerland'' (See list \1\), imported from abroad for the 
temporary exhibition without profit within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. These objects are imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign lenders. I also determine that the 
exhibition or display of the listed exhibit objects at the Kimbell Art 
Museum, Fort Worth, Texas, from approximately October 5, 1997 through 
October 5, 2000, is in the national interest. Public Notice of this 
determination is ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

    \1\ A copy of this list may be obtained by contacting Ms. Neila 
Sheahan, Assistant General Counsel, at 202/619-5030, and the address 
is Room 700, U.S. Information Agency, 301 4th Street, S.W., 
Washington, DC 20547-0001.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: July 31, 1997.
Les Jin,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-20693 Filed 8-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
(Reap. Dec. 9166)

#### United States *v.*D. N. & E. Walter & Co.

Entry No. 15017.

(Decided June 5, 1958)

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Richard E. FitzGibbon,*trial attorney), for the plaintiff.

*Lawrence Tuttle (George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This is a collector’s appeal for reappraisement involving the value, for duty purposes, of certain furniture articles exported from Hong Kong and entered at the port of San Francisco. The merchandise was appraised at invoiced unit values, less 15.818 per centum.

At the trial, the following stipulation was entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> Mb. FitzGibbon: * * *

> # # ‡ # # #

> We offer to stipulate with the attorney for the defendant that the items marked *“A”*on the invoice are dutiable for or are valued for duty purposes at the invoice value, less 24.53%, and that the articles marked “B” on the invoice should be valued for duty purposes at the invoice values, less 3.54%, and that the items marked “C” and “D” on the invoice, should be valued at the invoice value, less 10.13 per centum ad valorem.

> .Mb. Tuttle: We agree.

> *853MR. FitzGibbon: Tbe case is submitted upon that stipulation of fact. I believe briefs aren’t necessary.

> Judge Wilson: Case is ordered submitted on the stipulation * * *.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper value of the items marked *“A”*on the invoice is the invoice value, less 24.53 per centum in each case; that the proper value of the items marked “B” on the invoice is the invoice value, less 3.54 per centum in each case; and that the proper value of the items marked “C” and “D” on the invoice is the invoice value, less 10.13 per centum in each case.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### John J. Hodgen, plaintiff in error, *vs.*The United States, defendant in error.

*Error to Jefferson.*

The act making it indictable to cut timber off the School Lands, is not contrary to the Organic Law.

John James Hodgen was indicted for unlawfully cutting down, destroying, and hauling from off the *16th*section in township No. 73 N. of R. 8 W. in Jefferson county. To which there was a general demurrer. The demurrer was overruled.

The ease was submitted to a jury on the plea of not guilty. Verdict guilty, and the value of the timber taken assessed at ten dollars.

The defendant by Teas, his attorney, then moved in arrest of judgment, because :

1. The statute upon which the indictment was founded was contrary to the organic law.

2. There was no property or interest vested in the 16th section, in the territory of Iowa, that would authorize the legislature to legislate upon the subject.

3. The act of the legislature was void, because the Congress of the United States had passed a law making It penal to cut, destroy or haul off timber from any of the public lands, and the trial and conviction in this case cannot be pleaded in bar to an indictment under the laws of the United States.

The motion in arrest was overruled, and the defendant fined twenty dollars and costs.

To reverse this judgment the defendant below brings his writ of error to this court.

J. 13. Teas & J. C. Hall, for plaintiff in error.

H. T. Reid, for defendant in error.

Per Curiam,

Mason, Chief Justice

This case presents no point not decided in the case of Chalfont vs. The United States. We shall therefore merely refer to that decision.

Judgment affirmed.
IN THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS

_____________________ _____

09-16-00049-CR

__________________________

_________________________________________________________________ 

On Appeal from the

252nd District Court of Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 14-20464

_________________________________________________________________ 

JUDGMENT

THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. IT 

IS THEREFORE ORDERED, in accordance with the Court’s opinion, that 

the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion of the Court delivered by Justice Hollis Horton

December 13, 2017

AFFIRMED

**********

Copies of this judgment and the Court’s opinion are certified for 

observance.

Carol Anne Harley

Clerk of the Court

Dennis Jermaine Booker

v.

The State of Texas
No. 95-8659.

#### Hawks *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 40562.

#### Petition 5784-R of Camlin Corset Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following Abstract 40015 the court held that the entry was without any intent to defraud the revenue. The petition was therefore granted.
#### Joan CAPDEVIELLE, wife of Curtis R. Boisfontaine v. Curtis R. BOISFONTAINE.

No. 60048.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 17, 1977.

In re: Curtis R. Boisfontaine applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ Denied: Inadequate showing that supervisory relief should be afforded instead of the appellate review allowed by law.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.

CALOGERO, J., dissents from writ denial.