alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION









<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Infinity  Capital Group,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Theodore
A. Greenberg,  Principal  Accounting  Officer,  Chief Financial  Officer,  Chief
Investment  Officer and  Secretary of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: August 19, 2009


/s/Theodore A. Greenberg
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Position: Principal Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
Chief Investment Officer and Secretary


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1488

FANCZI SCREW COMPANY, Plaintiff - Appellant,
and

CAROLINA TOOLING CONCEPTS, Plaintiff,

versus

ORIX FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, formerly known as Orix Credit Alliance, Incorporated, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (6:02-cv-00198-TLW)
Argued: January 31, 2007 Decided: February 15, 2007
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ARGUED: Stanley Eugene Barnett, SMITH, BUNDY, BYBEE & BARNETT, P.C., Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellant. Samuel Walter Hixon, III, WILLIAMS MULLEN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. ON2 BRIEF: William R. Mauck, Jr., Patrick R. Hanes, WILLIAM MULLEN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* Fanczi claims its actual damages should be measured as “the value of the very performance promised” -- that is, the value of the lease agreement. However, Fanczi has conceded that the market value of the whirling machine was no different at the time of Orix’s breach than at the time of contracting, and so offered no basis before us or the district court for determining the value of the lease agreement other than lost profits.
3 PER CURIAM: Orix Financial Services, Inc., an equipment leasing company, breached its contract to lease an industrial device known as a whirling machine to Fanczi Screw Company. We previously held that the contract between the parties included a limitations provision that “chos[e] New York state law, and prohibit[ed] consequential and punitive damages.” Fanczi Screw Co. v. Orix Fin. Servs., Inc. , 114 Fed. Appx. 548, 553 (4th Cir. 2004). Our previo us opinion describes the facts of the relationship between the parties and the procedural history of this litigation, so we need not repeat these
here. See id. at 550-52. On remand, the district court concluded that: (1) Fanczi’s lost profits did not constitute actual damages under New York law; * and (2) by its plain language, a provision in the security agreement concerning the payment of attorney’s fees and interest provided rights only to the “Mortgagor” (defined in the Security Agreement as Orix) and not to the “Mortgagee” (defined as Fanczi). Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and oral argument, we affirm for reasons well stated by the district court. Fanczi4 Screw Co. v. Orix Fin. Servs., Inc. , No. 6:02-198-TLW, slip op. (D.S.C. July 26, 2005).

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. ID-5302-000] 

Take notice that on May 11, 2007, Robert W. Bryant filed an Application for Authorization to Hold Interlocking Positions, pursuant to section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act. 

Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant. 

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov.*                     Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                 

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov,*                     using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*                     or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. Eastern Time on June 11, 2007.                 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

 [FR Doc. E7-9990 Filed 5-23-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     9
                                  
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                         22,825
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               2,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    48,305
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         13,737
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           13,843
<LOANS>                                        228,972
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (4,493)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 324,919
<DEPOSITS>                                     270,345
<SHORT-TERM>                                   16,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            5,415
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       18,800
<OTHER-SE>                                     14,359
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 324,919
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                22,732
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              4,515
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               (9)
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               27,238
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             7,995
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             8,749
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          18,489
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  705
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (47)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                9,910
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                8,887
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     8,887
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5,114
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.94
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 .065
<LOANS-NON>                                    360
<LOANS-PAST>                                   1
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               63
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               4,005
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  288
<RECOVERIES>                                   71
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              4,493
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           3,732
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        761
        


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT


OF


CERTIFICATE
OF INCORPORATION


INTERNATIONAL
SMART SOURCING, INC.






International
Smart Sourcing, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”) does
hereby certify:




FIRST: That the Board of
Directors of the Corporation, by the unanimous written consent of its members in
accordance with Section 141 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware (the “GCL”), adopted a resolution proposing and declaring advisable the
following amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation:




RESOLVED, that the Certificate
of Incorporation of this Corporation be amended by changing the Article thereof
numbered "FIRST" so that, as amended, said Article shall be and read as
follows:






“FIRST:
The name of the Corporation is: Network 1 Financial Group, Inc.”




SECOND: That, thereafter, in
lieu of a meeting and vote of stockholders in accordance with Section 228 of the
GCL, written consents signed by the holders of an aggregate of 54.55% of shares
of the Corporation’s voting common stock, such percentage being not less than
the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such
action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present
and voted, were delivered to the Corporation’s principal place of
business.




THIRD: That said amendment was
duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the
GCL.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed this 9th day of
June, 2009.




By:
            /s/
      David R. E. Hale(Authorized
      Officer)Name: 
      Dave R. E. HaleTitle: 
      President and CEO
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2354

MICHELLE WAGNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

K-MART CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee,

versus

ROBERTS JANITORIAL & FLOOR CARE SERVICE,

Third Party Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-96-33-2-18)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: July 31, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michelle Wagner, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jackson Wills, IV, James

Earle Reeves, BARNWELL, WHALEY, PATTERSON & HELMS, Charleston,

South Carolina, for Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the jury’s verdict in this personal injury action and the district court’s order denying Appellant’s

motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wagner v. K-Mart

Corp., No. CA-96-33-2-18 (D.S.C. June 19 & July 30, 1997). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Docket No. FAA-2013-1066
No. 5905.

#### J. J. ADAMS vs. KOHLMAN BROS. & SUGARMAN.

Syllabus.

Involves only issues of fact.

Appeal from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Division “ D, ” No. 101,937. Hon. Porter Parker, Judge.

Hall, Monroe & Lemann and George Montgomery, for plaintiff and appellant.

Beer & Robbert, for defendant and appellee.

His Honor, JOHN ST. PAUL,

rendered the opinion and decree of the court, as follows:

Plaintiff sold to defendants about 140 bushels of Irish .potatoes, still in the ground, delivery to be on board c'ars at Angie, La.

It is an undisputed fact established by disinterested testimony that at the time of loading the potatoes were in apparent sound condition.

It is also a fact established by disinterested testimony that when the shipment reached New Orleans four days later, one-lialf of the potatoes had rotted.

*36Opinion and decree, December 8, 1913.

It is an undisputed fact that potatoes in good condition when dug from the ground should keep from sixty to ninety days without rotting; and on the other hand that “water-soaked” potatoes will begin to rot within from one to five days after being taken from the ground.

From the foregoing facts there is but one conclusion to be drawn, and that is notwithstanding the apparent sound condition of the shipment, part thereof must have been “water-soaked” at the time of loading.

The district Judge reached this conclusion, and we concur in it.

Judgment affirmed.
#### C. M. Wray et al. *v.*United States

No. 6176.

Invoices dated Dumfries, Scotland, September 1942.

Certified October 1942.

Entered at New York, N. Y., October 24, 1942, etc.

EntryNo. 710071, etc.

(Decided June 22, 1945)

*Jordan & Klingaman (Edward F. Jordan*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Cole, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, filed June 12, 1945, wherein tbe parties agree that the issues presented herein are tbe same as those decided in *United States*v. *Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc.*(suit No. 4481), C. A. D. 305 and that tbe record in that case may be incorporated herein.

In tbe incorporated case, tbe court found cost of production, section 402 (f), to be tbe proper basis for appraisement, and held that the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the,United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act, 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48,” was not an item to be included in the “usual general expenses” contemplated within subdivision (2) of section 402 (f), *supra,*and therefore not to be calculated in determining such statutory value.

On the agreement of counsel that the several elements entering into the statutory cost of production of the items in question are equal to the appraised values thereof, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases, I hold such values to be the cost of production, section 402 (f), *supra,*which I find to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant-merchandise. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 46543.

#### Protest 984648-G of N. Y. Merchandise Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation'of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 38680 the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained.
----

**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 I, John Hromyk, certify that:

 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of  Coventure International Inc.;

 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any  untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary  to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such  statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this  report;

 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other  financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material  respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the  registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))  for the registrant and have:

 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused  such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its  consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,  particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure  controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the  period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s  internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s  most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely  to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial  reporting; and

 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of  internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors  and the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent  functions):

 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in  the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are  reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,  process, summarize and report financial information; and

 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management  or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal  control over financial reporting.

Date: March 22, 2005

*/s/ John Hromyk                                                     *  John Hromyk   Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer 

----
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
     I, Ronald J. Lashute, Executive Vice-President and Chief Executive Officerof the Bank; Chief Executive Officer and Secretary/Treasurer of the Company,certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Bancorp,Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
           (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
           (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisannual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
           (c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluationas of the Evaluation Date;
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions);
           (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for theregistrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal control; and
           (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls;and
     6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in thisannual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
/s/ Ronald J. LashuteRonald J. Lashute