alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robert RANDALL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1193.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 14, 1977.

*1234Robert Randall, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen. and Jose R. Rodriguez, Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was charged, by information containing a count of false imprisonment, six counts of robbery while carrying a deadly weapon, and one count of possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense, to wit: robbery. He pleaded not guilty, was tried before a jury which returned a verdict of guilty on all counts. All sentences were to run concurrently with the longest sentence. This appeal ensued.

Four points are preserved for review. That the trial court erred in not having the defendant present during the charge conference. We do not find this constitutes fundamental error. There is no requirement, by statute or rule, that a defendant be present at a charge conference and no objection to the procedure was made by the defendant in the trial court. *State v. Melendez,*244 So.2d 137 (Fla.1971). Error is urged in the failure of the trial judge to give instructions on lesser included offenses. The only question preserved for review by the jury was the identity of the culprit. The crimes were admitted; the defendant gave an alibi defense, and the only question to be determined by the jurors was the identity of the perpetrator of the crime. As a matter of trial strategy, the defendant could waive the charge on lesser included offenses in such a situation. See: *Black v. State,*279 So.2d 909 (Fla.3rd D.C.A. 1973). There is also a contention that more than one sentence could not be imposed under the circumstances of the alleged single transaction. This is without *1235merit in the instant case. See: *Johnson v. State,*338 So.2d 556 (Fla.3rd D.C.A. 1976). Lastly, the appellant, by pro se brief, contends for the first time on appeal that the State supplied him with ineffective assistance of counsel through the Public Defender’s Office. This is not a proper subject of error on direct appeal, but should first be made in the trial court by a petition under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. See: *State v. Barber,*301 So.2d 7 (Fla.1974).

Therefore, for the reasons above stated, the verdict, adjudications, and sentences be and they are hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.
No. 39271.

#### Protest 935419-G of Butler Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of photo frames plated with silver similar to those the subject of *Woolworth*v. *United States*(T. D. 47857). The claim at 50 percent under paragraph 339 as household utensils was therefore sustained.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Child Care Services Provided by Hospitals

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Hart, Annie L. 						*Child Care Services Provided by Hospitals : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 295*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1970,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5558,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of Sterling Drilling Fund 1983-2 (the
Partnership) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Beverly A. Cummings, Chief Financial Officer of PrimeEnergy Management
Corporation, the Managing General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Partnership. /s/ Beverly A. Cummings
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofSOUTH SHORE RESOURCES INC.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch 31, 2008as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,Richard Wachter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

Dated this 14thday of May, 2008.

RICHARD WACHTERRichard WachterChief Financial Officer






























---
#### Charles A. FINKEL, Appellant, v. SUN TATTLER COMPANY, INC., a Florida Corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 76-1409.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 1, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 10, 1977.

Quentin V. Long, Long & Finkel, P. A., Hallandale, for appellant.

*52Harold B. Wahl, Wahl & Gabel, Jacksonville, and Hugh S. Glickstein, Glickstein, Rubin & Rubinchik, Hollywood, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

It is undisputed and well settled that the Supreme Court of the United States has established a dual standard in libel and slander cases — one standard applicable to public officials or public figures — another standard applicable to private individuals. *(New York Times v. Sullivan,*376 U.S. 254, 84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964)).

No useful judicial purpose would be served to embark upon a discourse regarding the relative merits of such duality or the privileges resulting therefrom. Suffice it to say, such a distinction exists and we apply the applicable law relating thereto.

Accordingly, based upon our understanding of *New York Times v. Sullivan,*supra, and its progeny, it appears that the appellant is a public official or public figure by virtue of his former status as city attorney and his current activities relating thereto or emanating therefrom. See also *Gertz v. Welch,*418 U.S. 323, 94 S.Ct. 2997, 41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974); *Rosenblatt v. Baer,*383 U.S. 75, 86 S.Ct. 669, 15 L.Ed.2d 597 (1966). Therefore the *New York Times v. Sullivan*“actual malice” standard is the applicable rule by which to measure accountability of appellee for any alleged libel.

Having so concluded, it does not necessarily follow that a summary judgment on this legal proposition is dispositive of the entire cause. In our opinion there exist genuine issues of material fact with respect to the presence or absence of malice on the part of the appellee which preclude the entry of summary judgment. See *Firestone v. Time,*231 So.2d 862 (Fla. 4 DCA 1970) cert. den. 237 So.2d 754 (Fla.1970).

Under such circumstances, any litigant, whether public official or private individual, is entitled to a trial on the merits of his or her claim. Our traditional sense of justice and fair play demands no less, particularly where one’s reputation or good name is alleged to have been impugned. The free speech protections of the First Amendment and the right of access to our courts under the Florida and United States Constitutions can be properly recognized, balanced and preserved in the sunshine of a trial on the merits.

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part, and remanded.

MAGER, C. J., and DAUKSCH, J., and KANEY, FRANK N., Associate Judge, concur.
No. 96-8053.

#### Tokars *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2330 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain hybrid electric vehicle inverters. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 23, 2012 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain hybrid electric 

vehicle inverters. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE INVERT4 ERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2330 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Inverters (provided for in 

subheading 8504.40.95) for 

converting DC battery output 

to three phase AC output designed to power an electric 

drive motor, certified by the 

importer for use in hybrid 

electric vehicles ...................... 1.1% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 152 (Thursday, August 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42486-42487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20736]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 912]


Expansion of Foreign-Trade Subzone 183A Dell Computer 
Corporation; Austin, TX

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, an application from the Foreign Trade Zone of Central 
Texas, Inc., grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 183, for authority to expand 
Foreign-Trade Subzone 183A at the Dell Computer Corporation plant in 
Austin, Texas, was filed by the Board on March 27, 1997 (FTZ Docket 24-
97, 62 FR 17147, 4/9/97); and,
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in Federal 
Register and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act 
and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and

[[Page 42487]]

that the proposal is in the public interest;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand Subzone 183A is approved, subject to the 
Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of July 1997.
Jeffrey P. Bialos,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20736 Filed 8-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-25-P
No. 46553.

#### Protests 789278-G, etc., of W. A. Taylor *&*Co. et al. (Baltimore, etc.)

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2015213EN.01001101.xml

| 29.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/11

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 April 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Galați — Romania) — Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Brăila v E.S.

(Case C-646/13) (1)

1

((Reference fora preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Social security for migrant workers - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Article 8(1) - Applicability of social security conventions between Member States - Repatriated refugee originating in a Member State - Completion of periods of employment within the territory of another Member State - Application for the grant of an old-age benefit - Application refused))

(2015/C 213/16)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Galați

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Brăila

Appellant:

Respondent: E.S.

Respondent:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 988/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that a bilateral convention on social security benefits for nationals of one of the signatory States who had political-refugee status within the territory of the other signatory State, which was concluded at a date on which one of the two signatory States had not yet acceded to the European Union and which does not feature in Annex II to that regulation, does not remain applicable to the situation of political refugees repatriated to their State of origin prior to the conclusion of the bilateral convention and the entry into force of that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 39, 8.2.2014.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMEDICS
INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 29, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                         130,252
<SECURITIES>                                    65,272
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,436
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,891
<INVENTORY>                                     56,105
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               325,438
<PP&E>                                          50,560
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,897
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 488,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,906
<BONDS>                                         73,465
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,685
<OTHER-SE>                                     225,585
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   488,312
<SALES>                                         72,057
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,057
<CGS>                                           36,961
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,961
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,584
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   202
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 269
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,991
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,764
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,966
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,966
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
        




</TABLE>
Exhibit 23





Consent of Independent Auditors





The Board of Directors and Shareholders


Planar Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries:





We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-89372) and Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 33-82696, 33-82688, 33-90258, 333-45191,
333-37502, 333-86886, 333-101145, 333-101147, and 333-101148) of Planar Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated October 22, 2002 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Planar Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 27, 2002
and September 28, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 27, 2002, which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Planar Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended September 27, 2002. Our report refers to a change in method of accounting for goodwill in 2002.





/s/    KPMG LLP


December 20, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2352 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2352

           To suspend temporarily the duty on cinnamic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2012

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on cinnamic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CINNAMIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00       Cinnamic acid      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        (CAS No. 140-10-                                                   31/2015.......
                        3) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        2916.39.06.00)...

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO THE CRIMINAL

PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE :

:

:

: NO. 543

CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23 rd day of January , 2023

, Brian L. Deiderick, Esquire

, Lebanon

County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Criminal Procedural Rules Committee

for a term expiring J anuary 1, 202 7

.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. ER06-615-000] 

                    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) hereby gives notice that on May 23-25, 2007 members of its staff will attend the California Independent System Operator's (CAISO) training program entitled, “Market Redesign and Technology Upgrade (MRTU) Bid-to-Bill Training.” This training covers the MRTU market process timeline, bids, settlements, and billing, and will be held at the CAISO, 151 Blue Ravine Road, Folsom, CA. The agenda and other documents for the training are available on the CAISO's Web site,                     *http://www.caiso.com*.                           ( print page 29142)    

This training is sponsored by the CAISO and is open to interested parties and market participants. Commission staff attendance is part of its ongoing training activities. The training may discuss matters at issue in the above captioned docket. 

                    For further information, contact Steven Michals at                     *steven.michals@ferc.gov*; (202) 502-6373.                 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-9989 Filed 5-23-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
No. 46542

#### Protests 26667-K, etc., of Selsi Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

D allin ger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of complete aneroid barometers having barometer movements with altimeter dials similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Wagner-Watrous, Inc.*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 39, C. D. 419). , In accordance therewith they were held dutiable as machines, not specially provided for, at 27)4 percent under paragraph 372 as claimed.