alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2314 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2314

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on noils of camel hair.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 19, 2012

 Mr. Lieberman introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on noils of camel hair.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NOILS OF CAMEL HAIR.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.25 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to noils of camel hair) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 213 (Friday, November 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 66181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26886]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List; Proposed Deletions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed Deletions from the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to delete products from the 
Procurement List that were furnished by nonprofit agencies employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    Comments Must Be Received on or Before: 12/3/2012.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800, 1421 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia, 22202-3259.
    For Further Information or to Submit Comments Contact: Barry S. 
Lineback, Telephone: (703) 603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email 
CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 8503 (a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed 
actions.

Deletions

    The following products are proposed for deletion from the 
Procurement List:

Products:

NSN: 7520-01-584-1378--Pen & Calculator Case, Rosewood
NPA: Tarrant County Association for the Blind, Fort Worth, TX
Contracting Activity: General Services Administration, New York, NY

NSN: 8115-00-NIB-0001--Container, Mailing Cassette
NSN: 8115-00-NIB-0003--Cassette, Mailing Container
NPA: L.C. Industries for the Blind, Inc., Durham, NC
Contracting Activity: Library of Congress, Fedlink Contracts, 
Washington, DC

NSN: 6545-00-911-1300--Blanket Set, Bed
NSN: 6545-01-168-6893--First Aid Kit, Small Craft
NSN: 6545-00-920-7125--First Aid Kit, Gun Crew
NSN: 6545-01-141-9476--Medical Equipment Set, Ground Ambulance
NSN: 6545-01-191-8972--Medical Equipment Set, Trauma, Field
NSN: 6545-01-191-8971--Medical Equipment Set, X-Ray, Field
NSN: 6545-01-191-8970--Medical Equipment Set, Laboratory, Field
NPA: Ontario County Chapter, NYSARC, Inc., Canandaigua, NY
Contracting Activity: Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support, 
Philadelphia, PA

Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012-26886 Filed 11-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```
# Journal officiel C 48/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0936
  doi:10.3000/19770936.C_2013.048.fra |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 48 |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 56e année19 février 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0936

doi:10.3000/19770936.C_2013.048.fra

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 48

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

56e année19 février 2013

---

| Numéro d'information | Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Avis |
| | PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES |
| | Parlement européen |
| 2013/C 048/01 | Décision | 1 |

Numéro d'information

Sommaire

page

V   Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

Parlement européen

2013/C 048/01

Décision

1

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

V Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

Parlement européen

| 19.2.2013 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | C 48/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2013

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

C 48/1

---

DÉCISION

2013/C 48/01

LE SECRÉTAIRE GÉNÉRAL DU PARLEMENT EUROPÉEN,

vu le règlement (CEE, Euratom, CECA) no 259/68 du Conseil, modifié par le règlement (CE, Euratom) no 723/2004 et en dernier lieu par le règlement (UE, Euratom) no 1080/2010 du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 24 novembre 2010 modifiant le statut des fonctionnaires des Communautés européennes et le régime applicable aux autres agents de ces Communautés, et notamment l'article 30 de ce statut,

vu la décision du Bureau du 3 mai 2004 concernant la délégation des pouvoirs de l'autorité investie du pouvoir de nomination (AIPN) et de l'autorité habilitée à conclure les contrats d'engagement (AHCC), telle que modifiée en dernier lieu par le Bureau le 4 mai 2009,

vu la date d'expiration, le 31 décembre 2012, des listes de réserve du Parlement européen ci-après:

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, C/348, AST/1/05, AST/1/06, AST/5/08, PE/69/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S, PE/119/S,

vu l'avis de la Commission paritaire émis lors de sa réunion du 21 novembre 2012,

DÉCIDE:

Article premier

La durée de validité des listes de réserve:

AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, AST/5/08, PE/96/S, PE/110/S, PE/119/S

est prorogée jusqu'au 31 décembre 2013.

Article 2

La durée de validité des listes de réserve:

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, C/348, AST/1/05, AST/1/06 et PE/69/S

n'est pas prorogée.

Fait à Luxembourg, le 20 décembre 2012.

Klaus WELLE

Secrétaire general

---
<PAGE>



                                                             EXHIBIT 23.2



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-92419 on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-74677 on Form S-8, Registration
No. 333-77099 on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-81513 on Form S-3, and
Registration No. 333-36732 on Form S-8 of Worldwide Xceed Group, Inc.
(formerly Xceed, Inc. and Subsidiaries) of our report dated November 15,
2000, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Worldwide Xceed Group,
Inc. (formerly Xceed Inc. and Subsidiaries) for the year ended August 31,
2000.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP



New York, New York
November 15, 2000
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                 CERTIFICATION OF CO-PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Kevin K. Claudio, Senior Vice President, Global Business Operations of
SureBeam Corporation (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended
March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Dated: May 15, 2003                    By:  /s/ Kevin K. Claudio
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Kevin K. Claudio
                                            Senior Vice President,
                                            Global Business Operations
                                            (Co-Principal Executive Officer)




                 CERTIFICATION OF CO-PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, David A. Rane, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of SureBeam
Corporation (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended
March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Dated: May 15, 2003                    By:  /s/ David A. Rane
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David A. Rane
                                            Senior Vice President and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            (Co-Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                    ----------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




     In  connection  with the Annual Report of Nestor,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending  December 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,
William  B.  Danzell,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  and Claire M.
Iacobucci,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  each  hereby  certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to their knowledge:


     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section  13(a)or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company



Date: March 30, 2005


/s/ William B. Danzell
--------------------------------------------
William B. Danzell, Chief Executive Officer





Date: March 30, 2005


/s/ Claire M. Iacobucci
--------------------------------------------
Claire M. Iacobucci, Chief Financial Officer
#### John Culbertson and John Finch, plaintiffs in error, *vs.*John J. Tomlinson, defendant in error.

*Error to Cedar.*

Where a suit is brought upon a bond, in which the penalty is beyond the amount of a justice’s jurisdiction, the case is cognizable before him, if the amount claimed does not exceed fifty dollars.

W'here the action appears to be substantially brought upon a penal bond before a justice of the peace, although a bill of particulars for unliquidated damages may be filed, it will be regarded as regular ; the proceedings before justices not being limited to strict technical rules.

This vvas an action of debt, brought by Tomlinson against Culbertson & Finch, before a justice of the peace, on an attachment bond, with a penalty of one hundred dollars. The debt claimed was fifty dollars. The defendants moved for a non suit, on the ground that the bond was for an amount above the justice’s jurisdiction ; which was granted.

The plaintiff appealed to the District Court, and a verdict and judgment was had for the plaintiff, for the sum of one dollar, at April term, 1843.

Cn the trial the defendams objected to the admission of the bond in *405evidence, which was overruled, and the bond permitted to be read to the jury.

The defendants below, sued out a writ of error from this court,

Lowe & Cook, for plaintiffs in error.

Carleton, for defendant in error.

Per Curiam,

Mason, Chief Justice.

One of the objections taken by the plaintiffs in error, in this case is, that if the action is considered as being brought upon the bond, the case was not within the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace. Such jurisdiction is limited to cases where the debt or sum claimed ” does not exceed fifty dollars. In this case the *sum claimed*was only fifty dollars, and although the penalty of the bond was for a larger amount, we think there was no excess of jurisdiction. See Hall vs. Biever, decided at the July term, 1841.

But it is said that the action was not brought upon the bond, but for unliquidated damages, and therefore debt would not lie. We must not limit the proceedings before justices of the peace, to strict technical rules. The action seems to have been substantially brought upon the bond, which is all that was necessary.

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2017022EN.01003101.xml

| 23.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 December 2016 — The Art Company B & S v EUIPO — Manifatture Daddato and Laurora (SHOP ART)

(Case T-735/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for an EU figurative mark SHOP ART - Earlier EU figurative mark art - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 022/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: The Art Company B & S, SA (Quel, Spain) (represented by: L. Sánchez Calderón and J. Villamor Muguerza, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Manifatture Daddato SpA (Barletta, Italy) (represented by: D. Russo, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Sabina Laurora (Trani, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 October 2015 (Case R 3050/2014-1), relating to opposition proceedings between The Art Company B & S, on the one hand, and Manifatture Daddato and Ms Laurora, on the other.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 October 2015 (Case R 3050/2014-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 October 2015 (Case R 3050/2014-1);

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 68, 22.2.2016.

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Fuels project quick-turn supports Osan mission

By William S. FarrowHuntsville Center Public Affairs

                HUNTSVILLE, Ala.  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the U.S. Army Engineering and Support Center website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

U.S. Army Engineering and Support CenterU.S. Army Engineering and Support Center HuntsvilleOsan Air Basefuel storagefuel tankfuel tank inspection
No. 99-7837.

#### Joyner *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
(Reap. Dec. 9156)

#### Baker Irons & Dockstader, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 853557.

(Decided May 22, 1958)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

*835An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### F. W. Woolworth Company *v.*United States

No. 8126.

Entry Nos. 277; 1996

(Decided June 5, 1952)

*Sharretts, Hillis & Paley (Howard C. Carter*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, that the market value or the price, at the time of exportation to the United States of the earthenware articles covered by the Appeals to Reappraisement enumerated on schedule “A” hereto attached and made part hereof, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States, was in each instance the appraised value less the amount added to meet advances made by the Appraiser in similar cases and that there is no higher foreign value.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that these appeals to reappraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined , in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the earthenware articles here involved, and that such value in each instance was the appraised value, less the amount added to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases.

Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

Judgement will be entered accordingly.
No. 96-5640.

#### Rayford *v.*Bosse, Warden, et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 39136.

#### Protests 749069-G/82517, etc., of Sears, Roebuck & Co. (Chicago and Galveston).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On the authority of *Strauss-Eckardt*v. *United States*(T. D. 48272) crib sets in chief value of papier máché were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1403 as claimed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

October 7, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00 599

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.R., ET AL ., Children,

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 02347 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

In this accelerated appeal of the trial court’s August 14, 2014 order terminating A ppellant’s parental rights, A ppellant’s brief was due to be filed with this court on September 29 , 2014

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). On October 6, 2014, A ppellant filed a n unopposed first motion for extension of time to file A ppellant’s brief and requested an extension of time to October 20, 2014, for an extension of twenty days. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appella nt’s brief must be filed with this court not lat er than October 20 , 201 4

. See id. R. 38.6(d).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 7th d ay of October, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
No. 40581.

#### Protests 911943-G, etc., of American Bemberg Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 7, 2014

No. 04-14-00599-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.R., ET AL., Children,

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-02347

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In this accelerated appeal of the trial court’s August 14, 2014 order terminating 

Appellant’s parental rights, Appellant’s brief was due to be filed with this court on September 

29, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). On October 6, 2014, Appellant filed an unopposed first 

motion for extension of time to file Appellant’s brief and requested an extension of time to 

October 20, 2014, for an extension of twenty days.

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief must be filed with this court not 

later than October 20, 2014. See id. R. 38.6(d).

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of October, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court