alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                        EXHIBIT 99(a)


SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL DATA

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)                                                                        Common Stock*
                                                                                        -----------------------------------
                                                                                        Dividends       Price Range
(In thousands, except per                     Income Before      Net    Net Income      Paid Per   ------------------------
share amounts)                    Revenues    Income Taxes     Income    Per Share       Share       High         Low
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                               <C>           <C>          <C>           <C>         <C>        <C>         <C>     
Fiscal 1997
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   First quarter (13 weeks)       $  67,332     $ 10,058     $  6,458      $  .71      $ .08500   $ 20.750    $ 18.875
   Second quarter (13 weeks)         59,617        8,273        5,273         .58        .09375     25.125      17.750
   Third quarter (13 weeks)          62,963        8,261        5,281         .58        .09375     34.875      23.875
   Fourth quarter (13 weeks)         71,585       11,664        7,644         .84        .09375     40.875      33.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Total Year                 $ 261,497     $ 38,256     $ 24,656      $ 2.71      $ .36625
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal 1996
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   First quarter (13 weeks)       $  49,988     $  5,964     $  3,764      $  .41      $ .080      $ 16.50    $ 14.38
   Second quarter (14 weeks)         55,474        8,116        5,116         .56        .085        17.75      15.75
   Third quarter (13 weeks)          53,421        7,236        4,896         .55        .085        18.38      16.75
   Fourth quarter (13 weeks)         61,738        9,450        5,990         .66        .085        20.00      17.75
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total Year                  $ 220,621     $ 30,766     $ 19,766      $ 2.18      $ .335
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<FN>
* The Common Stock of McDonald & Company Investments, Inc., is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The trading symbol
is MDD. At April 25, 1997, the approximate number of stockholders of record was 1,020.
</TABLE>


                                     -33-
# C_2013026EN.01003402.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/34

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 15 November 2012 — CTP v Regione Campania

(Case C-517/12)

2013/C 26/64

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: CTP — Compagnia Trasporti Pubblici SpA

Applicant:

Defendant: Regione Campania

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does the right to compensation arise, for the purposes of Article 4 of Regulation No 1191/69, (1) only where, following the submission of an appropriate application, the competent authorities have not terminated the public service obligation which imposes an economic disadvantage on the transport undertaking, or is that provision applicable only in respect of service obligations which are to be terminated and cannot be maintained under the regulation?

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69 of the Council of 26 June 1969 on action by Member States concerning the obligations inherent in the concept of a public service in transport by rail, road and inland waterway, (OJ 1969 L 156, p. 1).

1

---
exv10w72



 




Exhibit
10-72



Fourth Amendment

to the

DTE Energy Company Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan




Recitals



A.     DTE Energy Company (the “Company”) adopted the DTE Energy Company Executive Supplemental
Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) to enable the Company to attract and retain executives.



B.     The Organization and Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Company’s Board of
Directors is authorized to amend the Plan.



C.     By a resolution properly adopted on October 30, 2007, the Committee amended the Plan to provide
additional benefits required under Change in Control Severance Agreements entered into between the
Company and its executives and key employees.




Plan Amendment



Effective October 30, 2007, the DTE Energy Company Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan is
amended:




1.     New Section 14.08 is added as follows:




     14.08.     Additional Benefits.     The Account balance of any Participant who has
entered into a Change in Control Severance Agreement and whose employment is terminated
under circumstances entitling the Participant to Severance Benefits under Section 3(a) of
the Change in Control Severance Agreement will be credited with additional Compensation
Credits for the Participant’s Benefit Continuation Period as provided in Section 3(a)(4)(B)
of the Change in Control Severance Agreement, based on the Participant’s Base Salary
determined under Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Change in Control Severance Agreement and the
Participant’s Annual Cash Bonus determined under Section 3(a)(1)(B) of the Change in Control
Severance Agreement.




2.     Addendum I, “Change-in-Control Benefits” to the Sixth Restatement of The Detroit Edison Company
Management Supplemental Benefit Plan in Appendix A to the Plan, is amended by replacing “Section 4”
with “Section 3(a)” in the first sentence of the third paragraph following the first paragraph
numbered “(6).”



3.     Addendum I, “Change-in-Control Benefits” to the Sixth Restatement of The Detroit Edison Company
Management Supplemental Benefit Plan in Appendix A to the Plan, is amended by replacing “Section
4(a)(ii)” with “Section 3(a)(4)(B)” in the second paragraph numbered “(2).”



Fourth Amendment to ESRP — Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of China Natural Gas, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Xiaogang Zhu,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                  Xiaogang ZhuXiaogang
                  ZhuPrincipal
                  Accounting and
                Financial
                  OfficerNovember
                1,
                2007
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
     CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Each of the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Emageon Inc. hereby individually certifies that the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Emageon Inc.

      In witness whereof, each of the undersigned has executed and delivered
this Certification on this 16th day of May, 2005.

/s/ Charles A. Jett, Jr.                  /s/ W. Randall Pittman
-------------------------------           --------------------------------------
Charles A. Jett, Jr.                      W. Randall Pittman
Chief Executive Officer                   Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer)             (Principal Financial Officer)
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VITALY ZAKOUTO,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

JAMES BENEDETTI,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 08-15619

D.C. No. 06-CV-00133-JCM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Nevada state prisoner Vitaly Zakouto appeals from the district court’s

judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

FILED

JUN 11 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-15619

Zakouto contends that the trial court violated his confrontation rights by

admitting into evidence the deceased victim’s videotaped testimony from a prior

family court proceeding. It is undisputed that the victim was unavailable to testify

at trial and that Zakouto had an opportunity to cross-examine her at the earlier

proceeding. Therefore, the state court’s decision rejecting Zakouto’s confrontation

clause claim was neither contrary to, nor an unreasonable application of, clearly

established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); see also Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 59

(2004); United States v. Owens, 484 U.S. 554, 559 (1988).

AFFIRMED.
#### M’MULLIN, executor of BOWIE v. DAY, administratrix of DAY.

January 23, 1836.

*Ride to show came why the heirs of defendant’s intestate should not, be permitted to take defence in the name of defendant.*

Whore llse nUntneWiini’ *r*,.¡ru[ and she I . e . <>! ;he -o, .¡On* mO ,o tod ¡,, the cm r+ f I" tbo mu‘, <>1 tie u-,till Ji . 1 (oti'ijt timu to a|i(,i ,n ¡mt take di *U*me .ni die ju< nt, oi t,u .e>.uo >.} too o, a.ni.mior

The cum' i di i'i'j.i > .< „u»n Tm_v 6'oíu ¡1 i.efeavn}

THIS was a rule to show cause why William M’Kinney and others, heirs of William Day, should not be permitted to appear and take defence in the name of the administratrix.

*Chew,*in support of the rule,

produced a certified copy of the will of Jane Bowie, showing that Jane Day, in her individual right, was interested in the fund claimed from the estate of William Day ; and *137certain depositions, alleging that William M’Kinney and the other persons mentioned in the role, were the heirs of William Day, and had an interest in the suit. He cited, 13 *Serg.*& *Rawle*I.

*Jl'PCall*opposed the rule,

and cited, 34th section of the act of 24th of February 1834; 4 *Binn.*61 ; 8 *Serg.*& *Rawle*452 ; C *Serg.*& *Rawle*44 ; 7 *Serg.*& *Rawle*1 ; *Sugd. on Vend.*219. :

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Pettit, *President.*

The obvious principles of justice and policy require, that where the heirs interpose, their right to defend should be liberally encouraged. This was expressly laid down in Fritz *v.*Evans, 13 *Serg.*& *Rawle*1, where the heirs had an interest in respect of the land. The reason of the rule is precisely the same where they have an interest in personal property constituting the fund. The heirs here avow a disposition to try the case fairly upon its original merits. While then the administratrix should not be allowed to do any act to the prejudice of the heirs, she should be left at liberty to exercise her discretion as to the question, whether the statute of limitation should or should not be pleaded. The rule therefore is made absolute, upon condition that the heirs shall not plead the statute of limitation, but shall try the cause, in all respects, upon its merits.

Rule absolute.
# C_2014380EN.01000802.xml

| 27.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 380/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 380/8

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2014 — Aroa Bodegas v OHIM — Bodegas Muga (aroa)

(Case T-536/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community figurative mark aroa - Earlier national figurative mark Aro - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Likelihood of confusion))

2014/C 380/10

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Aroa Bodegas, SL (Zurukoain, Spain) (represented by: S. Alonso Maruri, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Bodegas Muga, SL (Haro, Spain) (represented by: L. Broschat García, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 October 2012 (Case R 1845/2010-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Bodegas Muga, SL and Aroa Bodegas, SL.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Aroa Bodegas, SL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Aroa Bodegas, SL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

| 3. | Orders Bodegas Muga, SL to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Bodegas Muga, SL to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 9.2.2013.

1

---
EXHIBIT 31.1: Rule 13a-14(a) Certification - CEO I, Yao Qitai, certify that:  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pingchuan Pharmaceutical, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this  report;


3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report;  4.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:  a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.





Date: November 13, 2006 /s/ Yao Qitai Yao Qitai, Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2363 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2363

   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain handheld food blenders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2012

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain handheld food blenders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN HANDHELD FOOD BLENDERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Handheld food and   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        beverage blending                                                  31/2015.......
                        devices, each
                        powered by a DC
                        motor and with a
                        synthetic rubber
                        handle and
                        removable
                        stainless steel
                        blending arm
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8509.40.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
LADD FURNITURE, INC.

                         1997 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN

                                 PLAN HIGHLIGHTS

1.      Incentive payments based on financial performance and individual
        performance as follows:
                  For Corporate Participants
                           o  achievement of PAT target
                           o achievement of ROAE target (selected management)
                           o achievement of individual objectives
                  For      Operating Group and Company Participants o
                           achievement of PBT targets o achievement of ROIC
                           targets (presidents only) o achievement of individual
                           objectives
2.      No incentive payments will be made to any individual if the operating
        unit to which the individual is assigned does not achieve minimum PBT or
        PAT targets. Incentive payment expense will be accrued in results before
        calculation of profit.

3.      Total of 142 officers and key managers to participate in the plan
        (Exhibit I). Maximum incentives range from 10% to 100% of January 1,
        1997 base salary. Incentive payments are based on achieving performance
        criteria established by senior management.

4.      Program includes $50,000 discretionary incentive pool for extraordinary
        performance by LADD employees not covered by the Management Incentive
        Plan.

5.      Estimated incentive payout at planned performance levels is $2.9 
        million.

6.      Incentives earned in 1997 will be paid in cash after completion of
        annual audit (not later than March 31, 1998).

7.      In the event of a transfer of a participant during the fiscal year to an
        operating unit other than the unit in which originally a Plan
        participant, an appropriate adjustment will be made in Incentive Plan
        eligibility pro-rata for the time worked in each unit.

8.      In the event of a promotion of a participant within the same operating
        unit, an appropriate adjustment will be made in Incentive Plan
        eligibility pro-rata. In the event of a demotion which would place
        participants in a position substantially different from that in which
        they were nominated as a participant, an appropriate adjustment may be
        made as to the amount of incentive payment for which they are eligible
        as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

9.      Participants will forfeit all income from plan if employment is
        terminated prior to January 1, 1998 for any reason other than death,
        disability or retirement (over age 55).

10.     The 1997 Management Incentive Plan only applies to fiscal year 1997.

<PAGE>










<PAGE>
#### Associated Merchandising Corp. *v.*United States

No. 7705.

Pro forma invoice dated Burslem, England, October 1943.

Entered at New-York, N. Y., December 1, 1943.

Entry No. 716219.

(Decided May 24, 1949)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for tbe plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This proceeding has been submitted upon a stipulation wherein the parties hereto have agreed that the issues involved in this reappraisement are the same in all material respects as in the case of *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334. The record in that case was admitted as part of the record herein.

In view of the aforesaid stipulation and accepting same as a statement of fact, and in view of the decision cited, I find and hold that the export value of the merchandise is the value found by the appraiser, less any additions on entry by the importer by reason of advances by the appraiser in similar cases to equal the so-called British purchase tax.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.