alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Army Adds Medical Materiel to European Prepositioned Stocks

By Ellen CrownU.S. Army Medical Materiel Agency

                DUELMEN, Germany  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the 405th Army Field Support Brigade website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

U.S. Army Medical Materiel AgencyU.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel CommandArmy prepositioned stocksMedicalmedical equipmentbiomedical equipment
No. 45361.

#### Protests 47989-K, etc., of Conestoga Cream & Cheese Mfg. Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Locatelli*v. *United States*(T. D. 48284 and T. D. 49389) it was held that an allowance in weight should have been made to compensate for the inedible c'overing on the outside of the cheese in question.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MILLENNIUM CAPITAL VENTURE HOLDINGS,
INC.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jose Araque , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


By:  /s/ Jose Araque
     --------------------------------------
     Jose Araque , Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 21, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2235 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2235

To prohibit the establishment by air carriers and airport operators of 
     expedited lines at airport screening checkpoints for specific 
           categories of passengers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 26, 2012

 Mr. Nelson of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was read 
     twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
                             Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the establishment by air carriers and airport operators of 
     expedited lines at airport screening checkpoints for specific 
           categories of passengers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Air Passenger Fairness Act of 
2012''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ESTABLISHMENT BY AIR CARRIERS AND AIRPORT 
              OPERATORS OF EXPEDITED SECURITY LINES FOR SPECIFIC 
              CATEGORIES OF PASSENGERS.

    Section 44901 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(m) Prohibition on Establishment by Air Carriers and Airport 
Operators of Expedited Security Lines for Specific Categories of 
Passengers.--
            ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), no 
        air carrier or operator of an airport may establish an 
        expedited line for a specific category of passengers at an 
        airport screening checkpoint at which passengers are screened 
        before entering the sterile area of the airport.
            ``(2) Exceptions.--The prohibition in paragraph (1) does 
        not apply--
                    ``(A) to the establishment or operation of an 
                expedited line at an airport screening checkpoint for 
                passengers with a disability (as defined in section 3 
                of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 
                U.S.C. 12102)); or
                    ``(B) to the establishment or operation of an 
                expedited security screening program by the 
                Transportation Security Administration or any other 
                Federal, State, or local government agency.
            ``(3) Sterile area defined.--In this subsection, the term 
        `sterile area' has the meaning given that term in section 
        1540.5 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (or any 
        corresponding similar regulation or ruling).''.
                                 <all>
```
ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This AGREEMENT (the "Agreement"), dated as of January 18, 2008, by and between
Document Capture Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation with principal
executive offices at 1772 Technology Drive, San Jose, California 95110
(hereinafter referred to as the "Company"), and Darwin Hu, an individual
residing at 761 Harry Road, San Jose, California 95120 (hereinafter referred to
as "Employee").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee are parties to an Employment Agreement,
dated April 26, 2005 (the "Original Agreement"); and

WHEREAS, the Company desires to continue to employ the Employee as its President
and Chief Executive Officer, and the Employee desires to serve the Company in
that capacity, upon the terms and subject to the conditions contained in the
Original Agreement, as amended by this Agreement;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein
contained, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

1. Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined herein have the
meanings ascribed to them in the Original Agreement.

2. The Employee agrees to continue to execute his duties and responsibilities in
accordance with the terms and provisions of the Original Agreement, subject to
the following terms and conditions as agreed upon:

      (a)   The first sentence of Section 2.a shall be replaced in its entirety
            by: "Subject to Section 9 and Section 10 below, the term of this
            Agreement shall be for a period of forty-two (42) months commencing
            on April 26th, 2005 (the Term)."

      (b)   Effective January 1, 2008, Employee shall be paid a base pay of
            $225,000 per year during the Term.

All other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement not affected hereby
shall remain in effect as originally drafted.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
date first above written.

DOCUMENT CAPTURE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.                        EMPLOYEE

By: /S/ WILLIAM HAWKINS                   /S/ DARWIN HU
    -------------------                   -------------
    William Hawkins                       Darwin Hu
    Chief Operating Officer
#### Dan C. FRISARD, petitioner, v. Cynthia TRAINA.

No. 98-228.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 13, 1998.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

Of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Minrad International, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal period ended March 31, 2006 (the Form 10-QSB) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                          
|------------------ |  | -------------------------
|Dated: May 1, 2006 |  | /s/ William H. Burns, Jr.
|                   |  | William H. Burns, Jr.    
|                   |  | Chairman & CEO           
|                   |  | (chief executive officer)
|                   | 
|Dated: May 1, 2006 |  | /s/ William L. Bednarski 
|                   |  | William L. Bednarski     
|                   |  | President and CFO        
|                   |  | (chief financial officer)



- 23 -
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1990 

To require the Transportation Security Administration to comply with the 

Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 14, 2011 

Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. BURR, 

Mr. AKAKA, Mr. TESTER, and Ms. LANDRIEU) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To require the Transportation Security Administration to 

comply with the Uniformed Services Employment and 

Reemployment Rights Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES 

4 EMPLOYMENT AND REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS 

5 ACT TO THE TRANSPORTATION SECURITY AD6 MINISTRATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 111(d) of the Aviation 

8 and Transportation Security Act (49 U.S.C. 44935 note; 

9 Public Law 107–71) is amended— 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1990 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘Notwithstanding’’ and insert2 ing the following: 

3 ‘‘(1) GENERAL AUTHORITY.—Except as pro4 vided in paragraph (2), and notwithstanding’’; and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(2) UNIFORMED SERVICES EMPLOYMENT AND

7 REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS ACT.—In carrying out the 

8 functions authorized under paragraph (1), the 

9 Under Secretary shall be subject to the provisions 

10 set forth in chapter 43 of title 38, United States 

11 Code.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is 270 

14 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Huifeng Bio-Pharmaceutical Technology, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jingan Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. Date:  November 13, 2006  /S/    Jingan Wang Jingan Wang Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of PDF Solutions, Inc. (“the Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on August 9, 2010 (“the Report”), I, John K.Kibarian, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ JOHN K. KIBARIAN                     |
|--------|------------------------------------------|
|   | John K. Kibarian                         |
|   | *President  and Chief Executive Officer* |
|   | *(Principal  Executive Officer)*         |

 

Date: August 9, 2010

 

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to
18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   Dated: November 13, 2007
    
    /s/ William H. Burns, Jr.

William H. Burns, Jr.Chairman and CEO
(principal executive officer of Minrad
International, Inc.)Dated: November 13, 2007
    
    /s/ William D. RolfeWilliam D. RolfeVice President Controller, Interim Chief
Financial Officer (principal financial officer
of Minrad International, Inc.)
 - 20 -
Exhibit 32.1

                           INTRAOP MEDICAL CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intraop Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald
A. Goer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                               /s/   Donald A. Goer
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                 Donald A. Goer
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

                                                 Date:  August 4, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Intraop Medical Corporation and will be retained by Intraop Medical
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2183 

To provide funding for the Fugitive Extradition and Apprehension Trust 

Fund. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2012 

Mr. DURBIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide funding for the Fugitive Extradition and 

Apprehension Trust Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bringing Fugitives to 

5 Justice Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FUGITIVE EXTRADITION AND APPREHENSION 

7 TRUST FUND. 

8 (a) FUGITIVE EXTRADITION AND APPREHENSION

9 TRUST FUND.— 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2183 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—There is created in the 

2 Treasury a separate account to be known as the Fu3 gitive Extradition and Apprehension Trust Fund 

4 (referred to in this section as the ‘‘trust fund’’). 

5 There shall be deposited in the trust fund the pro6 ceeds of forfeited appearance bonds, bail bonds, and 

7 collateral collected under section 3146 of title 18, 

8 United States Code. 

9 (2) USE OF FUNDS.—Amounts deposited in the 

10 trust fund pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be obli11 gated and expended by the Attorney General for the 

12 following purposes: 

13 (A) To the United States Marshals Service 

14 to enhance efforts to investigate and apprehend 

15 fugitives from justice. 

16 (B) To the Offices of the United States 

17 Attorneys to enhance efforts to investigate and 

18 prosecute fugitives from justice. 

19 (C) To the Office of International Affairs 

20 in the Department of Justice to coordinate the 

21 investigation and extradition or other legal ren22 dition of international fugitives from justice. 

23 (3) REALLOCATION.—Any portion of an 

24 amount available under this subsection which is not 

25 obligated by the Attorney General by the end of the 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2183 IS

1 fiscal year in which funds are made available for al2 location, shall be reallocated for award in the next 

3 fiscal year. 

4 (b) FISCAL YEAR.—Amounts shall be deposited in 

5 the trust fund established in subsection (a) beginning in 

6 fiscal year 2013. 

7 SEC. 3. AMENDMENTS TO THE CRIME VICTIMS FUND. 

8 Section 1402(b) of the Victims of Crime Act of 1984 

9 (42 U.S.C. 10601) is amended by— 

10 (1) striking paragraph (3); and 

11 (2) redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as 

12 paragraphs (3) and (4). 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eric Hawkins, Appellant.

[613 NYS2d 104]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to the contention of defendant that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated when police officers entered his home and arrested him. The officers were admitted by defendant’s father and had probable cause to arrest defendant. The identification card bearing defendant’s name and address was found by police in the back seat of the car where the crime occurred and was not there earlier that day.

Defendant’s contention that the court erred in allowing the in-court identification is also without merit. The People met their burden of establishing the reasonableness of the police conduct and the lack of suggestiveness of the pretrial identification procedures. The fact that the victim knew defendant’s name prior to selecting defendant’s photo from a photographic array was not suggestive of any particular photograph. (Appeal from Judgment of Oneida County Court, Clary, J.—Rape, 1st Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Fallon, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
U.S. Dept Commerce/NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC/Publications NOAA-NMFS-F/NWC-201: Status Review for Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon 
Figure 7. Time series of allele frequency data at six gene loci for fall chinook salmon from the Snake and upper Columbia Rivers, based on NMFS and WDF data summarized by Busack (1991b, Table 10). Old locus names (as used by Utter et al. 1982) are shown in parentheses below current names. Upper Columbia River data points are for wild samples from the Hanford Reach area and samples from Priest Rapids hatchery; unweighted averages were used in combining multiple samples from the same year. Pre-1985 samples for the Snake River are for presumably wild fish collected at Ice Harbor Dam; later samples are from Lyons Ferry Hatchery. Two Lyons Ferry samples were analyzed in 1990; the open circle represents a sample of all untagged fish, and the open triangle represents the sample of returning CWT Lyons Ferry fish (primarily from the 1986 brood). 

Use your browser's BACK button to return to the text.

Table of Contents
# C_2013147EN.01000202.xml

| 25.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/2

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sozialgerichts Nürnberg (Germany) lodged on 22 January 2013 — Petra Würker v Familienkasse Nürnberg

(Case C-32/13)

2013/C 147/03

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Sozialgerichts Nürnberg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Petra Würker

Appellant:

Respondent: Familienkasse Nürnberg

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

| 1. | Must Articles 77 or 78 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 (1) be interpreted as meaning that receipt of a child raising pension (Erziehungsrente) confers a right against the Member State which pays the pension? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Articles 77 or 78 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 (1) be interpreted as meaning that receipt of a child raising pension (Erziehungsrente) confers a right against the Member State which pays the pension?

1

| 2. | Has the situation changed from 1 May 2010 with the entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 (2) and must Article 67 of that regulation be interpreted as meaning that any type of pension (including a German child raising pension) triggers the right? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Has the situation changed from 1 May 2010 with the entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 (2) and must Article 67 of that regulation be interpreted as meaning that any type of pension (including a German child raising pension) triggers the right?

2

---

(1)  Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community (OJ 1971 L 149, p. 2).

1

(2)  Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ 2004 L 166, p. 1).

2

---