alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 46530.

#### Protests 766272-G, etc., of W. R. Zanes & Co. et al. (Galveston, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Troop Support flag room staff celebrates Flag Day at Betsy Ross House

By Mikia MuhammadDLA Troop Support Public Affairs

                PHILADELPHIA  –              
To celebrate Flag Day, June 14, The DLA Troop Support Flag Room team demonstrated the making of the presidential flag to visitors at the Betsy Ross House in Philadelphia. The Flag Room is the sole producer of the presidential and vice presidential flags, and its staff are considered the “Betsy Ross of the 21st century,” for their patriotic flag making.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLADLA Troop SupportFlag RoomBetsy Ross House
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
LADD Furniture, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
33-53341, 333-3129, 333-19565, 333-68189 and 333-19539) on Form S-8 of LADD
Furniture, Inc. of our report dated February 5, 1999, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of LADD Furniture, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
January 2, 1999 and January 3, 1998, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows and related schedule for each of
the years in the three-year period ended January 2, 1999, which reports appear
or are incorporated by reference in the January 2, 1999 annual report on Form
10-K of LADD Furniture, Inc.


                                              /s/ KPMG LLP


Greensboro, North Carolina
March 22, 1999
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Distribution leadership signs sexual assault prevention proclamation

By  DLA Distribution Public Affairs

                NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa.  –              
Marine Corps Maj. Gen. Keith D. Reventlow, Commander Defense Logistics Agency Distribution, and Perry Knight, Senior Executive Service, Deputy Commander DLA Distribution, sign a proclamation affirming the work force commitment to a safe environment free from any form of sexual assault.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLADistributionLeadershipSAPRSAAPMSAAPM Proclamation
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2014

h0421 

# Order

Clerk April 28, 2014

148224

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148224

COA: 316637

Wayne CC: 11

- 009553

- FC

GREGORY CHAMP RIVERS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 29, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | This                Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB of the Company for the quarter ended                September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission                (the "report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 12.1 

 

**RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION**

 

I, John C.K. Sham, certify that:****

 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Global-Tech Appliances Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report; and 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report. 

 

4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: 

 

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

 

(c) Disclosed in this Annual Report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: September 26,2003
(Reap. Dec. 9968)

#### D. J. Ambrosio *v.*United States

Entry No. 969539.

*652(Decided April 6, 1961)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*William B. Orriclc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Lawkence, Judge:

When tlie above-enumerated appeal for a re-appraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff. The court thereupon ordered the case submitted.

Eule 5(a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> Tbe submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by tbe parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to tbe court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. , I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
As discussed in detail above, 

### STATIC ELECTRIC willoperate the DJI Phantom 3

Professional UASs safely in the 

### NAS,without creating ahazard

### to usersof the 

### NAS, or the

### public, or otherwise pose athreat to nationalsecurity.

As setforth herein, 

### STATIC ELECTRIC seeks anexemption pursuant

### to 14 C.F.R. S 11.61 and Section 333of the 

### FAA Modernization and Reform 

### Act of 2012 

### (FMRA), which 

### will permit sat-e operation of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UASs commercially, 

### without an airworthinesscertificate, for

### the limited purpose

### of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the 

### United States. 

### By granting this Petition,the 

### FAA Administrator 

### will be

### fulfilling the Congressional mandate of the 

### FAA Modernization and 

### Reform Act

### of 2012,

### while also advancing the interests ofthe public, by 

### allowing STATIC ELECTRIC to safely,

### efficiently, and economically operate the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UASs cornmercially 

### within the 

### NAS.



### WHEREFORE, in accordance 

### with the Federal

### Aviation Regulations and the 

### FAA Modernization and 

### Reform Act

### of 2012, Section 333, 

### STATIC ELECTRIC respectfully requests that theAdministrator grant

### this Petition for an exemption from the 

### requirementsof 

### l4C.F.RSections6l.l 

### l3(a)&(b),91 .7(a),91.121,91.151 (b), 91.405(a), 91.a07@)(l ), 91.409(axl )

### & (a)(2), and 91.417 (a)

## & (b), and

### permit 

### STATIC ELECTRIC to operate the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UASs commercially for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography 

### over certain

areas of the United States. Dated: 

### July 15,2015
Respectful 

### ly submitted, 

# Jrxa E Scott E Erickson Static Electric Owner/Operator 551 Trust Drive Bayfield, CO 81"122 505-320-3592

Attachments: 

### Completed 

### application 

### for exemption 

### Link to DJI Professional 

### users Manual DJI Phantom 3 Professional Specifications Signature page

28
# C_2014462EN.01000902.xml

| 22.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) — United Kingdom) — The Queen, on the application of: Newby Foods Ltd v Food Standards Agency

(Case C-453/13) (1)

1

((Protection of health - Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 - Hygiene rules for food of animal origin - Annex I, points 1.14 and 1.15 - Concepts of ‘mechanically separated meat’ and ‘meat preparations’ - Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 - Prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies - Consumer protection - Directive 2000/13/EC - Labelling and presentation of foodstuffs))

(2014/C 462/15)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: The Queen, on the application of: Newby Foods Ltd

Applicant:

Defendant: Food Standards Agency

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Points 1.14 and 1.15 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin must be interpreted as meaning that the product obtained by the mechanical removal of meat from flesh-bearing bones after boning or from poultry carcases must be classified as ‘mechanically separated meat’ within the meaning of that point 1.14, since the process used results in a loss or modification of the muscle fibre structure which is greater than that which is strictly confined to the cutting point, irrespective of the fact that the technique used does not alter the structure of the bones used. Such a product cannot be classified as a ‘meat preparation’ within the meaning of that point 1.15.

---

(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.

1

---
SERVED JUNE 4,2010 ' "• ' '^'••''-.'%'""''"^'^ 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION , -

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CLOUD DANCER AVIATION 

Respondent. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CPlOSOOOOl 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

DMS NO. FAA-2010-0192 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2009SO150233) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge Isaac D. Benkin. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

/ 

CbnnJ^ A. Ybder 

Chief Administrative 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA DOCKET NO. CPlOSOOOOl 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Dennis R. Haber, Respondent's Counsel 

Dennis R. Haber, P.A. 

8925 S.W. 148 Street, Suite 200 

Miami, FL 33176 

TEL: 305-256-3002 

FAX: 305-256-3004 

Andrea Michelle Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ASO-7 

Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, Georgia 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable Isaac D. Benkin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 Newf Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2009 (the Report), I, Craig A. Knock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                                      
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 29, 2009 |  | /s/ Craig A. Knock                                   
|                       |  | Craig A. Knock                                       
|                       |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|                       |  | Principal Accounting Officer                         
|                       |  | Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc.               



50
No. 48819.

#### Petition 6161-R of Garcia Brothers and J. S. Holquin (El Paso).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

The Assistant Attorney General having interposed no objection, the court dismissed the petition.
Before the Third Division,

January 25, 1941

No. 45295.

#### Petition 5924—R of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

It was held that while the testimony of the employee of the petitioner was not very satisfactory nevertheless it appeared that the Government did not receive any information as to a higher price for the merchandise until after the entry had been made, and there was nothing to show that this information was available to the importer. On the record it was found that there was no intent to defraud or deceive the Government. The petition was therefore granted.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of USIP.Com,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Craig  Burton,
President  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                /s/ Craig Burton
                                  Craig Burton
                                  President, Chief Acct.
                                  Officer USIP.Com, Inc.


                               Date: May 17, 2006



                                  END OF FILING
No. 50775.

#### Protests 919793-G, etc., of Zausner & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct..270, C. D. 706), Abstract 42146, and Abstract 48269. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance óf *2}i*percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. The protests were sustained to this extent.