alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 216 Referred in House (RFH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 216

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2011

 Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 
    the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To increase criminal penalties for certain knowing and intentional 
     violations relating to food that is misbranded or adulterated.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Food Safety Accountability Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PENALTIES.

    Section 303(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
U.S.C. 333(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Any'' and inserting 
        ``Except as provided in paragraph (2) or (3), any'';
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``Notwithstanding the 
        provisions of paragraph (1) of this section, if'' and inserting 
        ``If''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(3) Any person who violates subsection (a), (b), (c), or (k) of 
section 301 with respect to any food--
            ``(A) knowingly and intentionally to defraud or mislead; 
        and
            ``(B) with conscious or reckless disregard of a risk of 
        death or serious bodily injury,
shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, imprisoned for not 
more than 10 years, or both.''.

            Passed the Senate April 4, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
19 MAY 2016

Mr. Pat Mullen

FAA - Small Airplane Directorate

901 Locust St

Room 301

Kansas City, MO 64106

USA

Dear Mr. Mullen:

SUBJECT: FAR 23.1549(b) - Exemption No. 13042 – Application for Exemption Extension

REFERENCE: Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-1345

The DHC-6 Series 400 aircraft that are “N” registered in the United States, are currently operating under 

Exemption No. 13042. Prior to this, they have been operating under Exemption No. 10465 and Exemption No. 

11059.

On January 6, 2016, Viking Air Limited (VAL) obtained Transport Canada certification of our Phase 2A 

avionics upgrade that enables S.O.O. 6280 “FAA Instrument Display Colours”. S.O.O. 6280 addresses the noncompliance with 23.1549(b) for the DHC-6 Series 400.

VAL is currently in the process of having Phase 2A validated with the FAA and just wrapped up two days of 

meetings (12-13 MAY 2016) at the New York Aircraft Certification Office. Although the FAA team will make 

every effort to complete their validation in time to meet the requirements of Exemption No. 13042, VAL was 

advised to request an additional extension to minimize the effect a delay in the validation process may have.

Please accept this letter as VAL’s official application to extend Exemption No. 13042 for an additional twelve

months.

I appreciate your consideration and look forward to hearing back from you at your earliest convenience.

Yours truly,

Adam Dennis, P.Eng.

Manager, Certification Engineering

cc.

Serge Napoleon, FAA – New York Aircraft Certification Office

Brian Hernandez, FAA – New York Aircraft Certification Office

Jim Rutherford, FAA - Small Airplane Directorate

Roger Goossens, TCCA - Prairie and Northern Region
(Reap. Dec. 9894)

#### Cosmic Radio Corp. Globe Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 879378.

(Decided January 6, 1961)

Plaintiffs not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawkenoe, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a re-appraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiffs. The court thereupon ordered the case submitted.

Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
SERVED APRIL 10, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

In Tlie Matter Of: 

MONTGOMERY 

AVIATION, INC., 

Respondent 

Docket No. FAA-2012-0023 

Case No. 2010-GL-11-0096 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On April 9, 2012, the Respondent, Montgomery Aviation, Inc., filed a 

Withdrawal of Appeal and a request to dismiss the Complainl. 1 he Respondent's 

Withdrawal of Appeal stated that the parties had reached a settlement. The Respondent 

attached a copy of the final Order Assessing Civil Penalty that the Complainant, the 

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), had issued on March 26, 2012. There is no 

hearing currently set in this matter. 

It Is Hereby Ordered: 

1) The May 31, 2012 Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference, set for 

11:00am-12:00pm EST, is cancelled. 

2) Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.215, the Respondent, VIontgomei-y Aviation, Inc., 

has Withdrawn its Appeal, and this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

ivan 

hi^trative Law Judge 

Attachment: Service List 
FDMSNO. FAA-2012-0023 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration , 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention; Hearing Docket Cterk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1 coo' 

ONE COPY 

J.C. Buehler, Respondent's Counsel 

Buehler Associates 

777 East 86'^ Street 

Box 40924 

Indianapolis, IN 46240-0924 

TEL: 317-253-8686 

FAX: 317-253-9371 

Daniel Rex Montgomery, President 

Montgomery Aviation, Inc., Respondent 

Indianapolis Executive Airport 

11329 East State Road 32 

Zionsville, IN 46077 

Chris G. Zurales, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7K 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

DesPlaines,IL 60018-4696 

TEL: 847-294-7713 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 " 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E, 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

- 2 -
Scheduled Commitment Decreases



 Exhibit 10.2 
 

 
 August 31, 2007 
 Ms. Maritza Ospina 
 Lehman Brothers Commercial Paper Inc. 
 As Administrative Agent 
 745 Seventh Avenue

 New York, NY 10019 
 Dear
Ms. Ospina: 
 Pursuant to Section 2.06 of the $3 billion 364 day Revolving Credit Agreement between CME Group Inc., as Borrower,
The Lenders Party thereto, and Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., as Administrative Agent, please accept this notice as our request to reduce the amount of the commitment from $3,000,000,000 to $1,500,000,000 as soon as possible. 
  

			
		 	Best regards,
		
		 	 /s/ James A. Pribel

		 	James A. Pribel
		 	Director and Treasurer

  

	 	cc:	Ms. Maritza Ospina 

 Lehman Brothers Commercial Bank

 745 Seventh Avenue 
 New York,
NY 10019 
 20 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606  T 312 930 1000  F 312 466 4410  cmegroup.com








 

 
 September 24, 2007 
 Ms. Maritza Ospina 
 Lehman Brothers Commercial Paper Inc. 
 As Administrative Agent 
 745 Seventh Avenue

 New York, NY 10019 
 Dear
Ms. Ospina: 
 Pursuant to Section 2.06 of the $3 billion 364 day Revolving Credit Agreement between CME Group Inc., as Borrower,
The Lenders Party thereto, and Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., as Administrative Agent, please accept this notice as our request to reduce the amount of the commitment from the current amount of $1,500,000,000 to $750,000,000 as soon as possible.

  

			
		 	Best regards,
		
		 	 /s/ James A. Pribel

		 	James A. Pribel
		 	Director and Treasurer

  

	 	cc:	Ms. Maritza Ospina 

 Lehman Brothers Commercial Bank

 745 Seventh Avenue 
 New York,
NY 10019 
 20 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606  T 312 930 1000  F 312 466 4410  cmegroup.com
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6394

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. DESARAE DENARDO MARION, a/k/a Ray, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:07-cr-00273-LMB-1; 1:09−cv−00106)

Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 24, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Desarae Denardo Marion, Appellant Pro Se. LeDora Knight, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Desarae Denardo Marion seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2008) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Marion has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. D-1791.

#### In re Disbarment of Growney.

William Edward Growney, of Pacifica, Cal., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Exhibit 32.1

 

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of CCA Industries, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended November 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, David Edell, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report, to which this certification is attached, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Action of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 

 

 

Date:  February 28,2008                                                                                                /s/DAVID EDELL

                                                                                                                                         David Edell

                                                                                                                                         Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

----

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Exhibit 32.2

 

 

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of CCA Industries, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended November 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen A. Heit, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)  The Report, to which this certification is attached, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Action of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 

 

 

Date:  February 28,2008                                                                                                                              /s/ STEPHEN A. HEIT

                                                                                                                                                                          Stephen A. Heit

                                                                                                                                                                        Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1

                              MINDEN BANCORP, INC.
                        100 MBL BANK DRIVE* P. O. Box 797
                          MINDEN, LOUISIANA 71058-0797
                      -------------------------------------
                             318-377-0523 TELEPHONE
                                318-377-0038 FAX
                                www.mblminden.com


PRESS RELEASE
-------------

For Release:   Immediately                       For Further Information:

                                                 A. David Evans,
                                                 President/CEO
                                                 318-377-0523
                                                 E-mail-david@mblminden.com
                                                 --------------------------
                                                              Or
                                                 Becky T. Harrell, Treasurer/CFO
                                                 318-377-0523
                                                 E-mail-becky@mblminden.com
                                                 --------------------------



          MINDEN BANCORP, INC. ANNOUNCES DECLARATION OF A CASH DIVIDEND
          -------------------------------------------------------------
                   FOR THE FIRST QUARTER ENDING MARCH 31, 2007
                   -------------------------------------------


Minden,  LA. - April 11,  2007 - Minden  Bancorp,  Inc.  (NASDAQ  OTC BB:  MDNB)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
announced  today that its Board of Directors at their meeting on April 10, 2007,
declared its seventeenth  cash dividend of $.10 per share on the common stock of
the Company  payable on May 8, 2007, to the  stockholders of record at the close
of business on April 26, 2007.

The Company is a holding  company  which owns all the capital stock of MBL Bank,
(formerly  Minden Building and Loan  Association),  a  Louisiana-chartered  FDIC
thrift,  and Woodard Walker  Insurance  Agency,  a leading property and casualty
agency,  both  headquartered  in Minden,  Louisiana.  At December 31, 2006,  the
Company had total assets of $116.0 million,  total liabilities of $95.8 million,
and total stockholders' equity of $20.2 million.
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2090 

AN ACT 

To amend the Indian Law Enforcement Reform Act to extend the period of time provided to the Indian Law 

and Order Commission to produce a required report, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2090 ES

1 SECTION 1. REPORT OF INDIAN LAW AND ORDER COMMIS2 SION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 15(f) of the Indian Law 

4 Enforcement Reform Act (25 U.S.C. 2812(f)) is amended 

5 in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘2 

6 years’’ and inserting ‘‘3 years’’. 

7 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 15(e) of the 

8 Indian Law Enforcement Reform Act (25 U.S.C. 2812(e)) 

9 is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by 

10 striking ‘‘paragraph (1)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (d)’’. 

Passed the Senate July 24, 2012. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2090 

AN ACT 

To amend the Indian Law Enforcement Reform 

required report, and for other purposes. Indian Law and Order Commission to produce a Act to extend the period of time provided to the
USGSHomeContactUSGSSearchUSGS

Data Series 448
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Joseph Sciacca, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Halifax Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) (Intentionally omitted);  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sforth fiscal quarter in the case of any annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting        Date: July 13, 2005 /s/ Joseph Sciacca   Joseph Sciacca   Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         584,647
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  342,307
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,619,799
<DEPRECIATION>                                 271,216
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,712,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,901,580
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,303
<OTHER-SE>                                     861,087
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,712,907
<SALES>                                        518,934
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               576,195
<CGS>                                           31,840
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  108,962
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                45,144
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             126,038
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                135,713
<INCOME-TAX>                                    41,821
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             93,892
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    92,461
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.50
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley   Act  of  2002,  each  of  the  undersigned   officers  of  Hugo
International Telecom, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies that:

     1.   The  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-QSB of the  Company  for the three
          months ended March 31, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



By:         /s/ Kevin Kreisler
            ---------------------------------------
By:             Kevin Kreisler
                Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Date:           January 24, 2006


This  certification  is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,
subject  to the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and not for any other
purpose.