alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**FINAL VERSION | 3** **1 -** **Ju ly** **- 12**  Task 1 Deliverable
– Materials for OMB ICR Submission C
-1

Dear _______________, You have been selected as one of a small number of [teachers/principals/school board members/district administrators] in your state to provide feedback to REL Midwest, which is one of ten **R**egional **E**ducational **L**aboratories funded by the U.S. Department of Education
. Each REL serves a designated region of the country and focuses on the national priority of helping states and districts use data and analysis to address relevant and timely education policy and practice issues with the goal of improving student outcomes. **Your feedback**  **is critical**  **because it**  **will help**  **REL Midwest**  **refine its**  **understanding of**  **regional needs**  **and inform**  **its future**  **research, technical**  **a ssistance, and dissemination work.**  The survey is being conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago and is expected to take approximately 20 minutes to complete. You may access the survey by typing the following URL into your Web browser: **http s** **://aaa.bbbbbb.org**. You will then need to enter your credentials to begin : **Username**: **Password** : Per the policies and procedures required by the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002, Title I, Part E, Section 183, responses to this data collection will be used only for statistical purposes. The reports prepared for this study will summarize findings across the sample and will not associate responses with a specific district or individual. We will not provide information that identifies you or your district to anyone outside the study team, except as required by law. Any willful disclosure of such information for nonstatistical purposes, without the informed consent of the respondent, is a class E felony. Please contact a NORC representative at XXX
-XXX
-XXXX if you wish to decline to participate, and we will remove you from our contact list so that you do not receive reminders to complete the survey
. Thank you,
Kathleen Parks Senior Vice President NORC at the University of Chicago P.S. You can learn more about REL Midwest and the services it provides to educators in your state by visiting the website at http://www.relmidwest.org/ or by call ing the REL Midwest hotline at 866
- 730
-6735.
#### Meadows Wye & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6909.

Entry No. 746234, etc.

Invoices dated Birmingham, England, February 27, 1946, etc.

Certified February 28, 1946, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., March 19, 1946, etc.

(Decided February 20, 1947)

*Jordan & Klingaman*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

It has been stipulated between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to safety razors, motorcycles, etc., are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C. A. D. 334, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts I find the export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the values of said merchandise, and that such values are the appraised values, less additions made by importers on entries because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 146 (Wednesday, July 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20168]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Agency Meetings; Sunshine Act Meeting

    Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: (62 FR 40127, 
July 25, 1997)

Status: Closed Meeting.

Place: 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

Date Previously Announced: July 25, 1997.

Change in the Meeting: Additional Items.
    The following items will be added to the closed meeting scheduled 
for Tuesday, July 29, 1997, following the 10:00 a.m. open meeting:

Institution of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature.
Institution of injunctive actions.

    The following item will be added to the closed meeting scheduled 
for Thursday, July 31, 1997, following the 10:00 a.m. open meeting: 
Opinion.
    Commissioner Hunt, as duty officer, determined that Commission 
business required the above changes and that no earlier notice thereof 
was possible.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary (202) 942-7070.

    Dated: July 28, 1997.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20168 Filed 7-28-97; 12:24 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph V. BONANNO, Roy J. Dorman, Jr., John J. Mathison.

No. 60041.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 14, 1977.

In re: Joseph V. Bonanno, Roy J. Dorman, Jr., John J. Mathison applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order.

Writ granted. On the showing made, the bail is reduced to $50,000. for each defendant.

SUMMERS, J., dissents from reduction of bail bond.
No. 40583.

#### Protests 797153-G, etc., of Ashcraft-Wilkinson Co. et al. (Philadelphia, etc.).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2012157EN.01000701.xml

| 2.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 157/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 157/7

---

Action brought on 1 March 2012 — Verus v OHIM — Performance Industries Manufacturing (VORTEX)

(Case T-104/12)

2012/C 157/11

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Verus Eood (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: S. Vykydal, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Performance Industries Manufacturing, Inc. (Odessa, Florida, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 21 December 2011 in Case R 512/2011-4, VORTEX/VORTEX, and refer the case back to the Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 21 December 2011 in Case R 512/2011-4, VORTEX/VORTEX, and refer the case back to the Board of Appeal;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court and the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court and the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Performance Industries Manufacturing Inc.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: word mark ‘VORTEX’ for goods in Classes 7 and 12 (Registration No 5 375 324).

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community word mark ‘VORTEX’, registered for services in Classes 35 and 39 (mark No 5 514 104).

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: rejection of the opposition.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: infringement of Article 8(2)(a) and (b) of Regulation No 207/2009, as there is a likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.

Pleas in law:

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Smith International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Doug
Rock, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief
Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: March 24, 2003            /s/ Doug Rock
      ---------------           ------------------------------------
                                Doug Rock
                                Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer,
                                President and Chief Operating Officer
#### Yevgenya Kuravskaya, Respondent, v Samjo Realty Corp., Appellant.

[700 NYS2d 855]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated February 9, 1999, as denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

It is well settled that summary judgment is a drastic remedy that should be granted only when there are no triable issues of fact *(see, Accius v Town of Hempstead,*266 AD2d 247; *Akseizer v Kramer,*265 AD2d 356). Since there are numerous triable issues of fact in this case, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion *(see, Roy McCutcheon, Architect, P. C. v Dolgin,*266 AD2d 368; *Gonzalez v Mott Haven Assocs. No. Eight,*265 AD2d 377). Bracken, J. P., S. Miller, Santucci and Thompson, JJ., concur.
exv10w2



 





Exhibit 10.2




FIRST AMENDMENT TO

SALES AND MARKETING AGREEMENT




     This First Amendment to Sales and Marketing Agreement (this “Amendment”) is effective as of
September 28, 2007 (“Effective Date”) by and among Akorn-Strides, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company having its principal place of business at 2500 Millbrook Drive, Buffalo Grove, Illinois
60089-4694 (“A-S”), and Akorn, Inc., a Louisiana corporation having its principal place of business
at 2500 Millbrook Drive, Buffalo Grove, Illinois 60089-4694 (“Akorn”), (each a “Party” and
collectively, the “Parties”).



RECITALS




     A. The parties have entered into that certain Sales and Marketing Agreement dated September
22, 2004 (the “Agreement”); and



     B. The Parties desire to amend the Agreement pursuant to the terms and conditions of this
Amendment.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual covenants and
conditions set forth below, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


1. Definitions. Unless otherwise defined in this Amendment, all capitalized terms herein
shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.



2. Commission Schedule. Section 1.4 of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following:




          “1.4 Reserved”



3. Compensation. Section 5.1 of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with
the following:





     “5.1 Compensation. As compensation for Services rendered under this Agreement,
A-S shall pay to Akorn a commission on the Net Sales of Products originating from the
Territory (“Commission”). The calculation and amount of such Commission shall be seven and
one-half percent (7.5%) of Net Sales.”


4. Exhibit A – Commission Schedule. Exhibit A of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety.



5. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts that together
shall be originals and constitute one and the same instrument. Each of the parties warrants to
each of the other parties that the individual executing this Amendment on behalf of such party has
the requisite authority to execute this Amendment and to bind such party to all the provisions of
this Amendment.




 









 







6. Continuing Validity. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the terms and
conditions of the Agreement will remain unchanged and in full force and effect, and are expressly
incorporated by reference in this Amendment. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this
Amendment and the Agreement, the terms of this Amendment will prevail.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	AKORN-STRIDES, LLC

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Arun Kumar
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Arun Kumar 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Manager 	 
	 
	 	AKORN, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Arthur S. Przybyl
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Arthur S. Przybyl 	 
	 	 	Title:  	President and Chief Executive Officer
The Board of Directors
SJNB Financial Corp.:

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
     33-31392) on Form S-8 of SJNB Financial  Corp. of our report dated July 15,
     1998,  relating to the consolidated  balance sheets of SJNB Financial Corp.
     and   subsidiary  as  of  December  31,  1997  and  1996  and  the  related
     consolidated statements of income,  shareholders' equity and cash flows for
     each of the years in the three-year  period ended December 31, 1997,  which
     report  appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of SJNB
     Financial Corp.

s/KPMG Peat Marwick


San Jose, CA
March 6, 1998
#### Inter-Maritime Fwdg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6217.

Invoices dated Hawick, Scotland, June 1943, etc.

Certified June 1943, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 12, 1943, etc.

Entry No. 700970, etc.

(Decided September 10, 1945)

*Tompkins & Tompkins {J. Stuart Tompkins*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel T. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Cole, Judge:

In a written stipulation filed September 6, 1945, the parties have agreed that the issues involved in these appeals for re-appraisement of wool wearing apparel are the same as those decided in *United States*v. *Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc.,*32 C. C. P. A. 187, C. A. D. 305, and that the record in the said case be incorporated herein.

*United States*v. *Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc., supra,*found cost of production, section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (f)), to be the proper basis for appraisement, and held that the so-called British purchase tax described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act, 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48,” was not an item to be included in the “usual general expenses” contemplated within subdivision (2) of section 402 (f)j *supra,*and therefore not to be calculated in determining such statutory value.

On the agreement of counsel that the several elements entering into the statutory cost of production of the items in question is equal to the appraised values thereof, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases, I hold such values to be the cost of production, section 402 (f), *supra,*which I find to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 Certification
        Pursuant to
 18
        U.S.C.
        Section 1350,
 (as
        adopted pursuant to Section 906
 of
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 In
        connection with the quarterly report Royal Spring Water Inc. (the “Company”), on
        Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30, 2006 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
        the undersigned of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
        1350,
        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
        to
        the best of their knowledge:
 
 1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
  A
        signed
        original of this written certification has been provided to the Company and
        will
        be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange
        Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 /s/
                  Alex HazanName:
                  Alex HazanTitle:
                  Chief Executive OfficerJanuary
                  22, 2007/s/
                  Harel GoldsteinName:
                  Harel GoldsteinTitle:
                  Chief Financial OfficerJanuary
                    22, 2007
  This
        Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This exhibit is not “filed” for purposes of Section
        18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as provided
        by applicable rules of the Securities Exchange Commission.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial  statements  and is  qualified  in its  entirety by  reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                         7,230,314
<SECURITIES>                                     758,373
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,867,709
<ALLOWANCES>                                     154,000
<INVENTORY>                                    1,364,510
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              15,441,177
<PP&E>                                         3,766,684
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,412,614
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                18,800,080
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,399,101
<BONDS>                                           51,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         563,456
<OTHER-SE>                                    11,970,023
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  18,800,080
<SALES>                                       62,885,464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              62,885,464
<CGS>                                         40,094,838
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 40,094,838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                81,020
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,184,620
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,308,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,876,620
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,876,620
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.24
        




</TABLE>
No. 40575.

#### Protest 748039-G of May Dept. Stores Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Schall*v. *United States*(T. D. 47385) angelica was held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as claimed.
March 18, 1997


The Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC  20549

Attention: Filing Desk, Stop 1-4

               Re:  CalEnergy Company, Inc. Form 10-K


Gentlemen:

      Submitted herewith via electronic transmission pursuant  to
EDGAR is the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1996 of CalEnergy Company, Inc. (the "Company").

      The Form 10-K (including exhibits) is also being filed with
the  New  York  Stock  Exchange and the  Pacific  Stock  Exchange
concurrently herewith.

                         Sincerely,



                         Douglas L. Anderson
                         Assistant Secretary and
                         General Counsel CalEnergy Americas
No. 47130.

#### Protests 844936-G, etc., of Adlanco X-Ray Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.