44680 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

within a 4.6-mile radius of Hartford-Brainard 

Airport from the Hartford-Brainard Airport 

158° bearing clockwise to the HartfordBrainard Airport 052° bearing, and within a 

6-mile radius of the Hartford-Brainard 

Airport from the Hartford-Brainard Airport 

052° bearing clockwise to the 158° bearing. 

This Class D airspace area is effective during 

specific dates and times established in 

advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective 

date and time will thereafter be continuously 

published in the Airport/Facility Directory 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth. 

* * * * * 

ANE CT E5 Hartford, CT [Amended] 

Hartford-Brainard Airport, CT 

(Lat. 41°44′12′′ N., long. 72°38′58′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within an 11.5-mile 

radius of Hartford-Brainard Airport. 

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on July 24, 

2014. 

Myron A. Jenkins, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern 

Service Center, Air Traffic Organization. 

[FR Doc. 2014–18067 Filed 7–31–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

15 CFR Part 744 

[Docket No. 140627545–4617–01] 

RIN 0694–AG22 

Addition of Certain Persons to the 

Entity List 

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Commerce. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This rule amends the Export 

Administration Regulations (EAR) by 

adding sixteen persons under nineteen 

entries to the Entity List. The persons 

who are added to the Entity List have 

been determined by the U.S. 

Government to be acting contrary to the 

national security or foreign policy 

interests of the United States. These 

persons will be listed on the Entity List 

under the destinations of Afghanistan, 

China, Hong Kong, Iran, and the United 

Arab Emirates (U.A.E.). There are 

nineteen entries for sixteen persons 

because three persons are listed under 

multiple destinations, resulting in three 

additional entries: one person in the 

U.A.E. has an address in Iran and two 

persons in China each have one address 

in Hong Kong. 

DATES: This rule is effective August 1, 

2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Chair, End-User Review Committee, 

Office of the Assistant Secretary, Export 

Administration, Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Department of Commerce, 

Phone: (202) 482–5991, Fax: (202) 482– 

3911, Email: ERC@bis.doc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Entity List (Supplement No. 4 to 

Part 744) notifies the public about 

entities that have engaged in activities 

that could result in increased risk of 

diversion of exported, reexported or 

transferred (in-country) items to 

weapons of mass destruction (WMD) 

programs. Since its initial publication, 

grounds for inclusion on the Entity List 

have expanded to include activities 

sanctioned by the State Department and 

activities contrary to U.S. national 

security or foreign policy interests. 

Certain exports, reexports, and transfers 

(in-country) to entities on the Entity List 

require licenses from BIS. License 

applications are reviewed with a 

presumption of denial. The availability 

of license exceptions for exports, 

reexports on transfers (in-country) is 

very limited. The license review policy 

for each entity is identified in the 

license review policy column on the 

Entity List. The availability of license 

exceptions is noted in the Federal 

Register notices adding persons to the 

Entity List. BIS places entities on the 

Entity List based on certain sections of 

part 744 (Control Policy: End-User and 

End-Use Based) of the EAR. 

The End-user Review Committee 

(ERC), composed of representatives of 

the Departments of Commerce (Chair), 

State, Defense, Energy and, where 

appropriate, the Treasury, makes all 

decisions regarding additions to, 

removals from, or other modifications to 

the Entity List. The ERC makes all 

decisions to add an entry to the Entity 

List by majority vote and all decisions 

to remove or modify an entry by 

unanimous vote. 

ERC Entity List Decisions 

Additions to the Entity List 

This rule implements the decision of 

the ERC to add sixteen persons under 

nineteen entries to the Entity List on the 

basis of § 744.11 (License requirements 

that apply to entities acting contrary to 

the national security or foreign policy 

interests of the United States) of the 

EAR. The nineteen entries added to the 

Entity List consist of five entries in 

Afghanistan, seven entries in China, two 

entries in Hong Kong, one entry in Iran, 

and four entries in the U.A.E. 

The ERC reviewed § 744.11(b) 

(Criteria for revising the Entity List) in 

making the determination to add these 

sixteen persons to the Entity List. Under 

that paragraph, entities for whom there 

is reasonable cause to believe, based on 

specific and articulable facts, have been 

involved, are involved, or pose a 

significant risk of being or becoming 

involved, in activities that are contrary 

to the national security or foreign policy 

interests of the United States, and those 

acting on behalf of such persons may be 

added to the Entity List. Paragraphs 

(b)(1) through (b)(5) of § 744.11 include 

an illustrative list of activities that could 

be contrary to the national security or 

foreign policy interests of the United 

States. 

The ERC determined to add four 

persons—FIMCO FZE, Crescent 

International Trade and Services FZE, 

Khosrow Kasraei, and Mujhid Ali– to 

the Entity List under five entries under 

the destinations of Iran and the U.A.E. 

on the basis of their involvement in 

activities contrary to the national 

security and foreign policy of the United 

States, under § 744.11(b)(2). These 

companies and their affiliates have been 

engaging in conduct that poses a risk of 

violating the EAR, specifically with 

regard to the attempted illicit reexport 

of U.S.-origin items to Iran, under 

§ 744.11(b)(2). These four persons were 

involved in the attempted export of a 

lathe machine subject to the EAR to Iran 

in violation of Department of the 

Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets 

Control regulations and the EAR. Lathe 

machines are used in the production of 

high grade steel or ‘‘bright steel’’, which 

in turn may be used, among other 

things, in the manufacture of 

automobile and aircraft parts. 

The ERC determined to add five 

persons—Emal Bilal Construction 

Company, Wahab Karwan Construction 

Company, Mohammad Jan Khan 

Mangal, Shan Mahmoud Khan Mangal, 

and Emal Bilal Mangal—to the Entity 

List under the destination of 

Afghanistan for involvement in 

activities contrary to the national 

security and foreign policy interests of 

the United States, specifically the 

activities described under paragraph 

(b)(1) (Supporting persons engaged in 

acts of terror) of § 744.11 of the EAR. 

These persons have engaged in activities 

in support of persons designated by the 

Secretary of State as a Foreign Terrorist 

Organization (FTO). The persons 

designated as FTOs were so designated 

as a result of their activities against U.S. 

and coalition forces in Afghanistan 

contrary to the national security and 

foreign policy of the United States. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 44681 

The ERC determined to add four 

persons—Beijing Aeronautics Yangpu 

Technology Investment Company 

(BAYTIC), Chengdu GaStone 

Technology Co. Ltd. (CGTC), China 

Electronics Technology Group 

Corporation 29 (CETC 29) Research 

Institute, and Jiangsu Leidian 

Technology Company (JLTC)—to the 

Entity List under the destination of 

China on the basis of their involvement 

in activities contrary to the national 

security and foreign policy interests of 

the United States. Specifically, the ERC 

determined that these persons have 

been involved in the activities described 

under paragraph § 744.11(b)(5) of the 

EAR. Paragraph (b)(5) specifies that the 

types of activities that could be contrary 

to the national security or foreign policy 

interests of the United States include 

engaging in conduct that poses a risk of 

violating the EAR when such conduct 

raises sufficient concern that the ERC 

believes that prior review of exports, 

reexports, or transfers (in-country) 

involving the party and the possible 

imposition of license conditions or 

license denial enhances BIS’s ability 

prevent violations of the EAR. The ERC 

has reasonable cause to believe that 

BAYTIC, CGTC, CETC 29 Research 

Institute and JLTC, have been involved 

in the illicit procurement of 

commodities and technologies for 

unauthorized military end use in China. 

The ERC also determined to add one 

person located in China—Qing’an 

International Trading Group (QTC)—to 

the Entity List on the basis of its 

involvement in activities contrary to the 

national security and foreign policy 

interests of the United States. 

Specifically, the ERC determined that 

this person has been involved in the 

activities described under paragraph 

§ 744.11(b)(5) of the EAR. The ERC has 

reasonable cause to believe that Qing’an 

International Trading Group has been 

involved in the illicit procurement of 

commodities and technologies for 

unauthorized military end use in China. 

Finally, the ERC determined that PRC 

Lode Technology Company and Su Bin, 

both located in both China and Hong 

Kong, should be added to the Entity List 

on the basis of their involvement in 

activities contrary to the national 

security and foreign policy interests of 

the United States. Specifically, the ERC 

determined that these two persons have 

been involved in the activities described 

under paragraph § 744.11(b)(5) of the 

EAR. The ERC has reasonable cause to 

believe that PRC Lode Technology 

Company and Su Bin have been 

involved in the unauthorized 

exploitation of computer systems of U.S. 

companies and Department of Defense 

contractors to illicitly obtain and export 

information, including controlled 

technology related to military projects, 

contrary to U.S. law. 

For the sixteen persons recommended 

for addition, the ERC specified a license 

requirement for all items subject to the 

EAR and a license review policy of 

presumption of denial. The license 

requirements apply to any transaction in 

which items are to be exported, 

reexported, or transferred (in-country) to 

any of the persons or in which such 

persons act as purchaser, intermediate 

consignee, ultimate consignee, or enduser. In addition, no license exceptions 

are available for exports, reexports, or 

transfers (in-country) to the persons 

being added to the Entity List in this 

rule. 

This final rule adds the following 

sixteen persons under nineteen entries 

to the Entity List: 

Afghanistan 

(1) Emal Bilal Construction Company 

(EBCC), a.k.a., the following two aliases: 

—Imal Bilal Road Construction 

Company; and 

—Aimal and Balal Company. 

Kolola Pushta, Charahi Gul-e-Surkh, 

Kabul, Afghanistan; and 

Maidan Sahr, Hetefaq Market, Paktiya, 

Afghanistan; 

(2) Emal Bilal Mangal, a.k.a., the 

following three aliases: 

—Imal Bilal; and 

—Aimal Balal; and 

—Bellal Mangal. 

Kolola Pushta, Charahi Gul-e-Surkh, 

Kabul, Afghanistan; and 

Maidan Sahr, Hetefaq Market, Paktiya, 

Afghanistan; 

(3) Mohammad Jan Khan Mangal 

Kolola Pushta, Charahi Gul-e-Surkh, 

Kabul, Afghanistan; and 

Maidan Sahr, Hetefaq Market, Paktiya, 

Afghanistan; 

(4) Shan Mahmoud Khan Mangal 

Kolola Pushta, Charahi Gul-e-Surkh, 

Kabul, Afghanistan; and 

Maidan Sahr, Hetefaq Market, Paktiya, 

Afghanistan; 

(5) Wahab Karwan Construction 

Company (WKCC) 

Qabel Boy, Jalalabad Road, District 9, 

Kabul, Afghanistan. 

China 

(1) Beijing Aeronautics Yangpu 

Technology Investment Company 

(BAYTIC), a.k.a., the following three 

aliases: 

—Beijing Aerospace Yangpu 

Technology Investment Company; 

and 

—Tian Hang Yang Pu Technology 

Investment Limited Company; and 

—Bei Jing Tian Hang Yang Pu 

Technology Investment Limited 

Company. 

No. 27 Xiaoyun Road, Chaoyang 

District, Beijing 100027, China; and 

Room 3120, Building 1, 16 Zhufang 

Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China; 

(2) Chengdu GaStone Technology Co., 

Ltd. (CGTC), 

31F, A Tower, Yanlord Square, No. 1, 

Section 2, Renmind South Road, 

Chengdu, China; 

(3) China Electronics Technology 

Group Corporation 29 (CETC 29) 

Research Institute, a.k.a., the following 

two aliases: 

—CETC 29th Research Institute; and 

—China Southwest Electronic 

Equipment Research Institute 

(SWIEE). 

No. 496 West Yingkang Road, Chengdu, 

Sichuan Province 610036, China; and 

Box #429, #1 Waixichadianziheng 

Street, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 

610036, China; 

(4) Jiangsu Leidian Technology 

Company (JLTC), 

88 Luyuan Road, Yixing Environmental 

Sciences Park, Jiangsu Province, 

China; 

(5) PRC Lode Technology Company, 

Room 8306 Kelun Building, 12A 

Guanghua Road, Chaoyang, Beijing 

100020, China; and 

Room 801, Unit 1, Building 8 Caiman 

Street, Chaoyang Road, Beijing 

100025, China; and 

Building 1–1, No. 67 Caiman Str., 

Chaoyang Road, Beijing 100123 

China; and 

Room A407 Kelun Building, 12A 

Guanghua Road, Chaoyang, Beijing 

100020, China; and 

Rm 602, 5/F, No. 106 NanHu Road, 

ChaoYang District, Beijing, China (See 

alternate addresses under Hong 

Kong); 

(6) Qing’an International Trading 

Group, a.k.a., the following three 

aliases: 

—Qing’an International Trading Group 

Company; and 

—Qing’an Company Shenzhen Station; 

and 

—China Qing’an International Trading 

Group. 

No. 27 Xiaoyun Road, Chaoyang 

District, Beijing 100027 China; and 

Room 901, Qing An Building, No. 27, 

Xiaoyun Road, Chaoyang District, 

Beijing 100027, China; 

(7) Su Bin, a.k.a., the following two 

aliases: 

—Stephen Subin; and 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
44682 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

—Steve Su. 

Room 8306 Kelun Building, 12A 

Guanghua Road, Chaoyang, Beijing 

100020, China; and 

Room 801, Unit 1, Building 8 Caiman 

Street, Chaoyang Road, Beijing 

100025, China; and 

Building 1–1, No. 67 Caiman Str., 

Chaoyang Road, Beijing 100123, 

China; and 

Room A407 Kelun Building, 12A 

Guanghua Road, Chaoyang, Beijing 

100020, China; and 

Rm 602, 5/F, No. 106 NanHu Road, 

ChaoYang District, Beijing, China (See 

alternate addresses under Hong 

Kong). 

Hong Kong 

(1) PRC Lode Technology Company, 

Rm 1019–1020 Nan Fung Centre, 264– 

298 Castle Peak Road, Tsuen Wan 

New Territories, Hong Kong; and 

Room 1522 Nan Fung Centre, 264–298 

Castle Peak Road, Tsuen Wan New 

Territories, Hong Kong (See alternate 

addresses under China); 

(2) Su Bin, a.k.a., the following two 

aliases: 

—Stephen Subin; and 

—Steve Su. 

Rm 1019–1020 Nan Fung Centre, 264– 

298 Castle Peak Road, Tsuen Wan 

New Territories, Hong Kong; and 

Room 1522 Nan Fung Centre, 264–298 

Castle Peak Road, Tsuen Wan New 

Territories, Hong Kong (See alternate 

addresses under China). 

Iran 

(1) FIMCO FZE, 

No. 3, Rahim Salehi Alley, Akbari St., 

Roomi Bridge, Dr. Shariati Ave, P.O. 

Box 3379, Tehran, Iran 3379/19395 

(See alternate address under U.A.E.). 

United Arab Emirates 

(1) Crescent International Trade and 

Services FZE, 

Office No. B34BS33O111, Jebel Ali, 

U.A.E.; 

(2) FIMCO FZE, 

LOB 16, F16401, P.O. Box 61342, JAFZ, 

U.A.E. (See alternate address under 

Iran). 

(3) Khosrow Kasraei, 

P.O. Box 61342, Jebel Ali, U.A.E.; 

(4) Mujahid Ali, a.k.a. the following 

one alias: 

—Mujahid Ali Mahmood Ali 

Office No. B34BS33O111, Jebel Ali, 

U.A.E. 

Savings Clause 

Shipments of items removed from 

eligibility for a License Exception or 

export or reexport without a license 

(NLR) as a result of this regulatory 

action that were en route aboard a 

carrier to a port of export or reexport, on 

August 1, 2014, pursuant to actual 

orders for export or reexport to a foreign 

destination, may proceed to that 

destination under the previous 

eligibility for a License Exception or 

export or reexport without a license 

(NLR). 

Export Administration Act 

Although the Export Administration 

Act expired on August 20, 2001, the 

President, through Executive Order 

13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR, 2001 

Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by 

Executive Order 13637 of March 8, 

2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013) and 

as extended by the Notice of August 8, 

2013, 78 FR 49107 (August 12, 2013), 

has continued the Export 

Administration Regulations in effect 

under the International Emergency 

Economic Powers Act. BIS continues to 

carry out the provisions of the Export 

Administration Act, as appropriate and 

to the extent permitted by law, pursuant 

to Executive Order 13222 as amended 

by Executive Order 13637. 

Rulemaking Requirements 

1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 

direct agencies to assess all costs and 

benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits 

(including potential economic, 

environmental, public health and safety 

effects, distributive impacts, and 

equity). Executive Order 13563 

emphasizes the importance of 

quantifying both costs and benefits, 

reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and 

promoting flexibility. This rule has been 

determined to be not significant for 

purposes of Executive Order 12866. 

2. Notwithstanding any other 

provision of law, no person is required 

to respond to nor be subject to a penalty 

for failure to comply with a collection 

of information, subject to the 

requirements of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 

et seq.) (PRA) unless that collection of 

information displays a currently valid 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) Control Number. This regulation 

involves collections previously 

approved by OMB under control 

number 0694–0088, Simplified Network 

Application Processing System, which 

includes, among other things, license 

applications and carries a burden 

estimate of 43.8 minutes for a manual or 

electronic submission. 

Total burden hours associated with 

the PRA and OMB control number 

0694–0088 are not expected to increase 

as a result of this rule. You may send 

comments regarding the collection of 

information associated with this rule, 

including suggestions for reducing the 

burden, to Jasmeet K. Seehra, Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), by 

email to Jasmeet_K._Seehra@

omb.eop.gov, or by fax to (202) 395– 

7285. 

3. This rule does not contain policies 

with Federalism implications as that 

term is defined in Executive Order 

13132. 

4. For the sixteen persons added 

under nineteen entries to the Entity List 

in this final rule, the provisions of the 

Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 

553) requiring notice of proposed 

rulemaking, the opportunity for public 

comment and a delay in effective date 

are inapplicable because this regulation 

involves a military or foreign affairs 

function of the United States. (See 5 

U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). BIS implements this 

rule to protect U.S. national security or 

foreign policy interests by preventing 

items from being exported, reexported, 

or transferred (in country) to the persons 

being added to the Entity List. If this 

rule were delayed to allow for notice 

and comment and a delay in effective 

date, then entities being added to the 

Entity List by this action would 

continue to be able to receive items 

without a license and to conduct 

activities contrary to the national 

security or foreign policy interests of the 

United States. In addition, because these 

parties may receive notice of the U.S. 

Government’s intention to place these 

entities on the Entity List if a proposed 

rule is published, doing so would create 

an incentive for these persons to either 

accelerate receiving items subject to the 

EAR to conduct activities that are 

contrary to the national security or 

foreign policy interests of the United 

States, or to take steps to set up 

additional aliases, change addresses, 

and other measures to try to limit the 

impact of the listing on the Entity List 

once a final rule was published. Further, 

no other law requires that a notice of 

proposed rulemaking and an 

opportunity for public comment be 

given for this rule. Because a notice of 

proposed rulemaking and an 

opportunity for public comment are not 

required to be given for this rule by 5 

U.S.C. 553, or by any other law, the 

analytical requirements of the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 

et seq., are not applicable. Accordingly, 

no regulatory flexibility analysis is 

required and none has been prepared. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 44683 

List of Subject in 15 CFR Part 744 

Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Terrorism. 

Accordingly, part 744 of the Export 

Administration Regulations (15 CFR 

parts 730–774) is amended as follows: 

PART 744—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for 15 CFR 

part 744 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 

U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 

42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 

U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR, 

1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 

3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59 

FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 

12947, 60 FR 5079, 3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p. 

356; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 

Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3 

CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 

44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 

13224, 66 FR 49079, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 

786; Notice of August 8, 2013, 78 FR 49107 

(August 12, 2013); Notice of September 18, 

2013, 78 FR 58151 (September 20, 2013); 

Notice of November 7, 2013, 78 FR 67289 

(November 12, 2013); Notice of January 21, 

2014, 79 FR 3721 (January 22, 2014). 

■ 2. Supplement No. 4 to part 744 is 

amended: 

■ a. By adding under Afghanistan, in 

alphabetical order, five Afghani entities; 

■ b. By adding under China, in 

alphabetical order, seven Chinese 

entities; 

■ c. By adding under Hong Kong, in 

alphabetical order, two Hong Kong 

entities; 

■ d. By adding under Iran, one Iranian 

entity; and 

■ e. By adding under United Arab 

Emirates, in alphabetical order, four 

Emirati entities. 

The additions read as follows: 

Supplement No. 4 to Part 744—Entity 

List 

Country Entity License 

requirement 

License 

review policy 

Federal 

Register 

citation 

*******

AFGHANISTAN 

*****

Emal Bilal Construction Company (EBCC), a.k.a., the following two aliases: 

—Imal Bilal Road Construction Company; and 

—Aimal and Balal Company. 

Kolola Pushta, Charahi Gul-eSurkh, Kabul, Afghanistan; 

and Maidan Sahr, Hetefaq 

Market, Paktiya, Afghanistan. 

For all items subject to the 

EAR. (See § 744.11 of the 

EAR). 

Presumption of denial.79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER] 

8/1/2014. 

*****

Emal Bilal Mangal, a.k.a., the 

following three aliases: 

—Imal Bilal; and 

—Aimal Balal; and 

—Bellal Mangal. 

Kolola Pushta, Charahi Gul-eSurkh, Kabul, Afghanistan; 

and Maidan Sahr, Hetefaq 

Market, Paktiya, Afghanistan. 

For all items subject to the 

EAR. (See § 744.11 of the 

EAR). 

Presumption of denial.79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER] 

8/1/2014. 

*****

Mohammad Jan Khan Mangal, 

Kolola Pushta, Charahi Gule-Surkh, Kabul, Afghanistan; 

and Maidan Sahr, Hetefaq 

Market, Paktiya, Afghanistan. 

For all items subject to the 

EAR. (See § 744.11 of the 

EAR). 

Presumption of denial.79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER] 

8/1/2014. 

*****

Shan Mahmoud Khan Mangal, 

Kolola Pushta, Charahi Gule-Surkh, Kabul, Afghanistan; 

and Maidan Sahr, Hetefaq 

Market, Paktiya, Afghanistan. 

For all items subject to the 

EAR. (See § 744.11 of the 

EAR). 

Presumption of denial.79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER] 

8/1/2014. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
44684 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

Country Entity License 

requirement 

License 

review policy 

Federal 

Register 

citation 

*******

Wahab Karwan Construction 

Company (WKCC), Qabel 

Boy, Jalalabad Road, District 

9, Kabul, Afghanistan. 

For all items subject to the 

EAR. (See § 744.11 of the 

EAR). 

Presumption of denial.79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER] 

8/1/2014. 

*****

*****

CHINA 

*****

Beijing Aeronautics Yangpu 

Technology Investment 

Company (BAYTIC), a.k.a., 

the following three aliases: 

—Beijing Aerospace 

Yangpu Technology Investment Company; and 

—Tian Hang Yang Pu 

Technology Investment 

Limited Company; and 

—Bei Jing Tian Hang 

Yang Pu Technology Investment Limited Company. 

No. 27 Xiaoyun Road, 

Chaoyang District, Beijing 

100027, China; and Room 

3120, Building 1, 16 Zhufang 

Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China. 

For all items subject to the 

EAR. (See § 744.11 of the 

EAR). 

Presumption of denial.79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER] 

8/1/2014. 

*****

Chengdu GaStone Technology 

Co., Ltd. (CGTC), 31F, A 

Tower, Yanlord Square, No. 

1, Section 2, Renmind South 

Road, Chengdu, China. 

For all items subject to the 

EAR. (See § 744.11 of the 

EAR). 

Presumption of denial.79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER] 

8/1/2014. 

*****

China Electronics Technology 

Group Corporation 29 

(CETC 29) Research Institute, a.k.a., the following two 

aliases: 

—CETC 29th Research 

Institute; and 

—China Southwest Electronic Equipment Research Institute (SWIEE) 

No. 496 West Yingkang Road, 

Chengdu, Sichuan Province 

610036, China; and Box 

#429, #1 

Waixichadianziheng Street, 

Chengdu, Sichuan Province 

610036, China. 

For all items subject to the 

EAR. (See § 744.11 of the 

EAR). 

Presumption of denial.79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER] 

8/1/2014. 

*****

Jiangsu Leidian Technology 

Company (JLTC), 88 Luyuan 

Road, Yixing Environmental 

Sciences Park, Jiangsu 

Province, China. 

For all items subject to the 

EAR. (See § 744.11 of the 

EAR). 

Presumption of denial.79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER] 

8/1/2014. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 44685 

Country Entity License 

requirement 

License 

review policy 

Federal 

Register 

citation 

*****

PRC Lode Technology Company, Room 8306 Kelun 

Building, 12A Guanghua 

Road, Chaoyang, Beijing 

100020, China; and Room 

801, Unit 1, Building 8 

Caiman Street, Chaoyang 

Road, Beijing 100025, 

China; and Building 1–1, No. 

67 Caiman Str., Chaoyang 

Road, Beijing 100123, 

China; and Room A407 

Kelun Building, 12A 

Guanghua Road, Chaoyang, 

Beijing 100020, China; and 

Rm 602, 5/F, No. 106 

NanHu Road, ChaoYang 

District, Beijing, China (See 

alternate addresses under 

Hong Kong). 

For all items subject to the 

EAR. (See § 744.11 of the 

EAR). 

Presumption of denial.79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER] 

8/1/2014. 

*****

Qing’an International Trading 

Group, a.k.a., the following 

three aliases: 

—Qing’an International 

Trading Group Company; and 

—Qing’an Company 

Shenzhen Station; and 

—China Qing’an International Trading Group. 

No. 27 Xiaoyun Road, 

Chaoyang District, Beijing 

100027, China; and Room 

901, Qing An Building, No. 

27, Xiaoyun Road, 

Chaoyang District, Beijing, 

China 100027, China. 

For all items subject to the 

EAR. (See § 744.11 of the 

EAR). 

Presumption of denial.79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER] 

8/1/2014. 

*****

Su Bin, a.k.a., the following 

two aliases: 

—Stephen Subin; and 

—Steve Su. 

Room 8306 Kelun Building, 

12A Guanghua Road, 

Chaoyang, Beijing 100020, 

China; and Room 801, Unit 

1, Building 8 Caiman Street, 

Chaoyang Road, Beijing 

100025, China; and Building 

1–1, No. 67 Caiman Str., 

Chaoyang Road, Beijing 

100123, China; and Room 

A407 Kelun Building, 12A 

Guanghua Road, Chaoyang, 

Beijing 100020, China; and 

Rm 602, 5/F, No. 106 

NanHu road, ChaoYang District, Beijing, China (See alternate addresses under 

Hong Kong). 

For all items subject to the 

EAR. (See § 744.11 of the 

EAR). 

Presumption of denial.79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER] 

8/1/2014. 

*****


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
44686 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

Country Entity License 

requirement 

License 

review policy 

Federal 

Register 

citation 

*******

HONG KONG 

*****

PRC Lode Technology Company, Rm 1019–1020 Nan 

Fung Centre, 264–298 Castle Peak Road, Tsuen Wan 

New Territories, Hong Kong; 

and Room 1522 Nan Fung 

Centre, 264–298 Castle 

Peak Road, Tsuen Wan 

New Territories, Hong Kong 

(See alternate addresses 

under China). 

For all items subject to the 

EAR. (See § 744.11 of the 

EAR). 

Presumption of denial.79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER] 

8/1/2014. 

*****

Su Bin, a.k.a., the following 

two aliases: 

—Stephen Subin; and 

—Steve Su. 

Rm 1019–1020 Nan Fung 

Centre, 264–298 Castle 

Peak Road, Tsuen Wan 

New Territories, Hong Kong; 

and Room 1522 Nan Fung 

Centre, 264–298 Castle 

Peak Road, Tsuen Wan 

New Territories, Hong Kong 

(See alternate addresses 

under China). 

For all items subject to the 

EAR. (See § 744.11 of the 

EAR). 

Presumption of denial.79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER ] 

8/1/2014. 

*****

IRAN 

*****

FIMCO FZE, No. 3, Rahim 

Salehi Alley, Akbari St., 

Roomi Bridge, Dr. Shariati 

Ave, P.O. Box 3379, Tehran, 

Iran 3379/19395 (See alternate address under U.A.E.). 

For all items subject to the 

EAR (See § 744.11 of the 

EAR). 

Presumption of denial.79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE ] 8/1/2014. 

*******

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 

*****

Crescent International Trade 

and Services FZE, Office 

No. B34BS33O111, Jebel 

Ali, U.A.E. 

For all items subject to the 

EAR. (See § 744.11 of the 

EAR). 

Presumption of denial.79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER ] 

8/1/2014. 

*****

FIMCO FZE, LOB 16, F16401, 

P.O. Box 61342, JAFZ, 

U.A.E. (See alternate addresses under Iran). 

For all items subject to the 

EAR. (See § 744.11 of the 

EAR). 

Presumption of denial.79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER ] 

8/1/2014. 

*****

Khosrow Kasraei, P.O. Box 

61342, Jebel Ali, U.A.E. 

For all items subject to the 

EAR. (See § 744.11 of the 

EAR). 

Presumption of denial.79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER ] 

8/1/2014. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 44687 

Country Entity License 

requirement 

License 

review policy 

Federal 

Register 

citation 

*****

Mujahid Ali, a.k.a. the following 

one alias: 

—Mujahid Ali Mahmood 

Ali 

Office No. B34BS33O111, 

Jebel Ali, U.A.E. 

For all items subject to the 

EAR. (See § 744.11 of the 

EAR). 

Presumption of denial.79 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER ] 

8/1/2014. 

*****

*******

Dated: July 25, 2014. 

Kevin J. Wolf, 

Assistant Secretary for Export 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2014–17960 Filed 7–31–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–33–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade 

Bureau 

27 CFR Part 9 

[Docket No. TTB–2014–0001; T.D. TTB–122; 

Ref: Notice No. 141] 

RIN 1513–AC03 

Establishment of the Manton Valley 

Viticultural Area 

AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and 

Trade Bureau, Treasury. 

ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision. 

SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax 

and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes the 

11,178-acre ‘‘Manton Valley’’ 

viticultural area in Shasta and Tehama 

Counties in northern California. The 

viticultural area does not lie within or 

contain any other established 

viticultural area. TTB designates 

viticultural areas to allow vintners to 

better describe the origin of their wines 

and to allow consumers to better 

identify wines they may purchase. 

DATES: This final rule is effective 

September 2, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and 

Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco 

Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street 

NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; 

phone 202–453–1039, ext. 175. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background on Viticultural Areas 

TTB Authority 

Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol 

Administration Act (FAA Act), 27 

U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary 

of the Treasury to prescribe regulations 

for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, 

and malt beverages. The FAA Act 

provides that these regulations should, 

among other things, prohibit consumer 

deception and the use of misleading 

statements on labels and ensure that 

labels provide the consumer with 

adequate information as to the identity 

and quality of the product. The Alcohol 

and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau 

(TTB) administers the FAA Act 

pursuant to section 1111(d) of the 

Homeland Security Act of 2002, 

codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The 

Secretary has delegated various 

authorities through Treasury 

Department Order 120–01 (Revised), 

dated December 10, 2013, to the TTB 

Administrator to perform the functions 

and duties in the administration and 

enforcement of this law. 

Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 

4) authorizes the establishment of 

definitive viticultural areas and the use 

of their names as appellations of origin 

on wine labels and in wine 

advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB 

regulations (27 CFR 9) sets forth the 

standards for the preparation and 

submission of petitions for the 

establishment or modification of 

American viticultural areas (AVAs) and 

lists the approved AVAs. 

Definition 

Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB 

regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines 

a viticultural area for American wine as 

a delimited grape-growing region having 

distinguishing features, as described in 

part 9 of the regulations, and a name 

and a delineated boundary, as 

established in part 9 of the regulations. 

These designations allow vintners and 

consumers to attribute a given quality, 

reputation, or other characteristic of a 

wine made from grapes grown in an area 

to the wine’s geographic origin. The 

establishment of AVAs allows vintners 

to describe more accurately the origin of 

their wines to consumers and helps 

consumers to identify wines they may 

purchase. Establishment of an AVA is 

neither an approval nor an endorsement 

by TTB of the wine produced in that 

area. 

Requirements 

Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB 

regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2)) outlines 

the procedure for proposing an AVA 

and provides that any interested party 

may petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as an AVA. Section 9.12 

of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12) 

prescribes standards for petitions for the 

establishment of AVAs. Petitions to 

establish an AVA must include the 

following: 

• Evidence that the area within the 

proposed AVA boundary is nationally 

or locally known by the AVA name 

specified in the petition; 

• An explanation of the basis for 

defining the boundary of the proposed 

AVA; 

• A narrative description of the 

features of the proposed AVA that affect 

viticulture, such as climate, geology, 

soils, physical features, and elevation, 

that make the proposed AVA distinctive 

and distinguish it from adjacent areas 

outside the proposed AVA boundary; 

• The appropriate United States 

Geological Survey (USGS) map(s) 

showing the location of the proposed 

AVA, with the boundary of the 

proposed AVA clearly drawn thereon; 

and 

• A detailed narrative description of 

the proposed AVA boundary based on 

USGS map markings. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES