alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013071EN.01003001.xml

| 9.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/30

---

Action brought on 7 December 2012 — ZZ v EMCDDA

(Case F-148/12)

2013/C 71/52

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision determining the applicant’s appraisal report in respect of the period from 1 January to 31 December 2011

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | Annul the decision of 9 March 2012 determining the 2012 appraisal report, which covers the period from 1 January to 31 December 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 9 March 2012 determining the 2012 appraisal report, which covers the period from 1 January to 31 December 2011;

| — | So far as necessary, annul the implied decision of 26 October 2012 of the Authority Authorised to Conclude Contracts rejecting the applicant’s complaint seeking the revision of his 2012 appraisal report; |
| --- | --- |

—

So far as necessary, annul the implied decision of 26 October 2012 of the Authority Authorised to Conclude Contracts rejecting the applicant’s complaint seeking the revision of his 2012 appraisal report;

| — | Order the EMCDDA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the EMCDDA to pay the costs.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 143 (Friday, July 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19765]



[[Page 40089]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, July 30, 1997.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:

    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-3207, beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting.

    Dated: July 23, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-19765 Filed 7-23-97; 11:08 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### Bulova Watch Co. et al. *v.*United States

No. 7897.

Entry No. 706215, etc.

(Decided October 30, 1950)

*Lane, Young & Fox (William H. Fox*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the merchandise the subject of these appeals are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Gothic Watch Co.,*23 Cust. Ct. 235, Reap. Dec. 7712, affirming *450tbe judgment in *Gothic Watch Co.*v. *United States,*19 Cust. Ct. 309, Reap. Dec. 7438, and that the record in Reap. Dec. 7712, *supra,*may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts, I find that the attempted appraisement embodied in the second return of value by the appraiser of the merchandise covered by each of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the annexed schedule, which is marked “A” and made a part of this decision, was illegal, null, and void, and that the appraiser’s original return of value in each case, as reported by him to the collector of-customs, constituted his appraisal of the merchandise pursuant to section 500 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1500), and was final and conclusive in the absence of any appeal pursuant to section 501 of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1501).

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
ALERTA DE SEGURIDAD de Productos de Consumo

de la Comisión de Productos del Consumidor de los Estados Unidos

Wasington, D.C. 20207

La Seguridad de las Bicicletas No Es Un Acidente

Cada año, se producen unas 800 muertes

relacionadas con las bicicletas en los Estados

Unidos y otro medio millón de lesiones

relacionadas con las bicicletas se tratan en las

salas de emergencia de los hospitales del país.

La Comisión de Seguridad de Productos de

Consumo de los Estados Unidos encarece a los

ciclistas de todas las edades que utilicen cascos

protectores. Los estudios han demostrado que

el empleo de cascos de ciclista puede reducir

las lesiones en la cabeza hasta en 85 por

ciento.

Sin embargo, no todas las lesiones y muertes

relacionadas con las bicicletas pueden

prevenirse mediante el uso de equipo de

seguridad solamente. Las acciones y reacciones

de los ciclistas –en especial en lo que respecta

al respeto del código de circulación—

desempeñan un importante papel en contribuir a

disfrutar del ciclismo sin accidentes.

 10 CONSEJOS INTELIGENTES PARA

 GARANTIZAR LA SEGURIDAD EN EL USO

 DE LAS BICICLETAS

 1. Proteja la cabeza... lleve puesto en casco de

 seguridad.

 2. Ver y ser visto... lleve puesta ropa de colores

 llamativos o bandas reflectoras.

 3. Evite montar en bicicleta por la noche.

 4. Manténgase alerta...manténgase vigilante de

 los obstáculos en su camino.

 5. Vaya con el flujo... con la corriente de tráfico.

 6. Compruebe el tráfico... tenga presente el

 tráfico en su alrededor (intersecciones,

 caminos de acceso a las viviendas, etc.).

 7. Aprenda las reglas de vialidad... estudie el

 código de circulación.

 8. Assegure que su bicicleta está en buenas

 condiciones operativas...asegúrese de que

 su bicicleta está de que su bicicleta está bien

 ajustada

 9. Asegúrese de poder parar la bicicleta...

 compruebe los frenos antes de montar en

 bicicleta.

 10. Compruebe las ruedas de la bicicleta...

 “Desmontaje rápido” – Las ruedas de la

 bicicleta deberían estar fijamente instaladas.

 Para más información, llame al 800-638-2772

000107 (se habla Español) o acceda a www.cpsc.gov
Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-41995 of HalifaxCorporation and subsidiaries on Form S-8 pertaining to the Halifax Corporation 1994 Key EmployeeStock Option Plan and Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan of our report dated June 14, 2004(June 23, 2006 as to the effects of discontinued operations described in Note 12) (which reportexpresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to the adoption ofStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,effective April 1, 2002), with respect to the consolidated consolidated statements of operations,stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2004 appearing in theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Halifax Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended March 31,2006./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPMcLean, Virginia
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2239 

AN ACT 

To direct the head of each agency to treat relevant military 

training as sufficient to satisfy training or certification 

requirements for Federal licenses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2239 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veteran Skills to Jobs 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. CONSIDERATION OF RELEVANT MILITARY TRAIN5 ING FOR ISSUANCE OF A FEDERAL LICENSE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The head of each Federal licens7 ing authority shall consider and may accept, in the case 

8 of any individual applying for a license, any relevant train9 ing received by such individual while serving as a member 

10 of the armed forces, for the purpose of satisfying the re11 quirements for such license. 

12 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this Act— 

13 (1) the term ‘‘license’’ means a license, certifi14 cation, or other grant of permission to engage in a 

15 particular activity; 

16 (2) the term ‘‘Federal licensing authority’’ 

17 means a department, agency, or other entity of the 

18 Government having authority to issue a license; 

19 (3) the term ‘‘armed forces’’ has the meaning 

20 given such term by section 2101(2) of title 5, United 

21 States Code; and 

22 (4) the term ‘‘Government’’ means the Govern23 ment of the United States. 

24 SEC. 3. REGULATIONS. 

25 The head of each Federal licensing authority shall— 
3 

†S 2239 ES

1 (1) with respect to any license a licensing au2 thority grants or is empowered to grant as of the 

3 date of enactment of this Act, prescribe any regula4 tions necessary to carry out this Act not later than 

5 180 days after such date; and 

6 (2) with respect to any license of a licensing au7 thority not constituted or not empowered to grant 

8 the license as of the date of enactment of this Act, 

9 prescribe any regulations necessary to carry out this 

10 Act not later than 180 days after the date on which 

11 the agency is so constituted or empowered, as the 

12 case may be. 

Passed the Senate June 29, 2012. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2239 

AN ACT 

To direct the head of each agency to treat relevant 

or certification requirements for Federal licenses. military training as sufficient to satisfy training
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-30478

Summary Calendar

WILLIAM EDWARD STEWART,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

JOE KEFFER,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 1:08-CV-909

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

In 1999, William Edward Stewart, federal prisoner # 83508-079, pleaded

guilty to money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956. In 2008, Stewart

1

filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 arguing that his money laundering

conviction should be invalidated in light of the Supreme Court’s then-recent

decision in United States v. Santos, 553 U.S. 507 (2008). Prior to service on the

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 17, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Accordingly, the recent amendment to this statute defining “proceeds” to include

1

“gross receipts of such activity” is not in contention. 18 U.S.C. 1956(c)(9)(2009).

Case: 09-30478 Document: 00511385642 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2011
No. 09-30478

defendant, the district court dismissed the § 2241 petition concluding that

Stewart did not meet the requirements for proceeding under the savings clause

of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 as set forth in Reyes-Requena v. United States, 243 F.3d 893,

904 (5th Cir. 2001). In reviewing the denial of habeas relief, the district court’s

findings of facts are reviewed for clear error and issues of law are reviewed de

novo. Jeffers v. Chandler, 253 F.3d 827, 830 (5th Cir. 2001).

In this case, the district court limited the application of Santos to cases of

illegal gambling. The district court did not have the benefit of this court’s

contrary reasoning in Garland v. Roy, 615 F.3d 391, 402-04 (5th Cir. 2010),

when it reached this conclusion. Accordingly, the judgment of dismissal of

Stewart’s § 2241 petition is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to

determine whether, consistent with Garland, his claim falls within the savings

clause of § 2255.

Stewart’s motion for release pending appeal is DENIED. See Calley v.

Callaway, 496 F.2d 701, 702 (5th Cir. 1974).

2

Case: 09-30478 Document: 00511385642 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2011
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20346]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,627]


White Cap, Incorporated, Plant No. 144; Hayward, California; 
Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on July 7, 1997 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed by the Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics and Allied Workers 
Union, Local Shop No. 82, on behalf of workers and former workers at 
Plant No. 144 of White Cap, Incorporated, located in Hayward, 
California (TA-W-33,627).
    The petitioning group of workers is subject to an ongoing 
investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued (TA-W-
33,655). Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve 
no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 16th day of July 1997.
Curtis K. Kooser,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-20346 Filed 7-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 147 (Thursday, July 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20210]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Notice of Solicitation for Financial Assistance Applications; 
Develop a Regional Market Transformation Guide for Energy Efficiency

AGENCY: The Department of Energy (DOE)

ACTION: Notice of Solicitation for Financial Assistance Applications, 
Number DE-PS45-97R530361.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U. S. Department of Energy (DOE), Chicago Regional Support 
Office (CRSO), announces its intention to issue a competitive 
solicitation for applications for financial assistance to (1) Develop a 
Regional Market Transformation Guide for Energy Efficiency and (2) 
Conduct a workshop for governmental agencies and private organizations 
in the region to discuss market transformation opportunities within the 
region.

Availability of Funding in FY 1997

    With this publication, the Chicago Regional Support Office is 
announcing the availability of up to $60,000 for this project during 
fiscal year 1997, which represents the first of what could be a several 
stage project to explore development of new market institutions in a 
restructured environment. Subsequent phases of this project, if any, 
will be separately awarded. The award will be made through a 
competitive process. The Chicago Regional Support Office intends to 
make only one award. DOE reserves the right to fund none of the 
applications.

Availability of the Solicitation

    DOE expects to issue the solicitation on August 1, 1997. Requests 
for the solicitation must be in writing and directed to Lynda 
Keammerlen. Facsimiles and electronic mail are acceptable and can be 
transmitted to (312) 886-8561 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0d617463696c2366686c6060687f6168634d657c23696268236a627b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d9b5a0b7bdb8f7b2bcb8b4b4bcabb5bcb799b1a8f7bdb6bcf7beb6af">[email protected]</span></a>. Beginning 
August 1, 1997, solicitations may also be obtained through the Golden 
Field Office Home Page at http://www.eren.doe.gov/golden/solicit.htm, 
followed, within ten days, by written notification of receipt to Lynda 
Keammerlen.

    Issued in Golden, CO.

    Dated: July 17, 1997.
John W. Meeker,
Chief, Procurement, GO.
[FR Doc. 97-20210 Filed 7-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Agenda Item 4

1

FEATHER RIVER AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

MEMORANDUM

02/03/2014

TO: FRAQMD BOARD OF DIRECTORS

FROM: Christopher D. Brown, AICP, APCO

SUBJECT: Approve the adoption of Resolution #2014-01 directing the APCO to submit

Regulation II, Rule 2.0 Open Burning to the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency as a revision to the California State Implementation Plan.

DISCUSSION:

This is an administrative action only and the adoption of Resolution #2014-01 only directs staff 

to submit current District rules to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and does 

not adopt or implement new controls on local sources.

EPA has requested that any District rule that controls emissions of directly emitted fine particle 

pollution (PM2.5) or its precursors to be submitted as a revision to the California State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). 

District Regulation II, Rule 2.0 controls emissions of PM2.5 from agricultural and residential 

outdoor open burning. The Rule resulted in emission reductions that assisted the Yuba CityMarysville Nonattainment area for the 24-hour PM2.5 national ambient air quality standard 

(NAAQS).

Regulation II, Rule 2.0 Open Burning was last amended by the District on October 6, 2008. 

When the Rule was amended the resolution did not specifically direct staff to submit it to the 

EPA as a SIP revision. Therefore, staff have prepared Resolution #2014-01 to direct staff to 

submit the rule to EPA as a SIP revision. 

Resolution #2014-01 will also remove the outdated burn rules from the SIP and replace them 

with the current burn rule. The Feather River Air Quality Management District was formed in 

1991 by combining the Yuba and Sutter Air Pollution Control Districts. The Yuba and Sutter air 

districts had previously submitted regulations controlling open burning to EPA and these burn 

rules were adopted into the SIP. The original burn rules from the Yuba and Sutter air districts 

need to be replaced with the current burn rule in the SIP because the EPA enforcement 

actions can only occur on SIP approved rules. 

The District published a public notice of the hearing on January 3, 2014, in the legal section of 

the Appeal Democrat. The notice invited public comment on the Rule SIP Submittal. The 

District also published the notice on its webpage.
Agenda Item 4

2

FISCAL IMPACT:

There are no expected fiscal impacts as there are no proposed amendments to Rule 2.0.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approve adoption of Resolution #2014-01 directing the APCO to submit Regulation II, Rule 2.0 

Open Burning to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a revision to the California

State Implementation Plan.
Agenda Item 4

Attachment A: Resolution 2014-01
Agenda Item 4

Attachment B: Rule 2.0 Open Burning (10/6/08)
Agenda Item 4

Attachment C: Public Notice 01/03/2014
Agenda Item 4

Attachment D: Public Comments
#### In re INTERDICTION OF Duval CANTU.

No. 98-CC-3170.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 6, 1999.

In re Kosak, Rebecca; — Other(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, No. 98CW-1185.

Writ denied; stay denied.

TRAYLOR, J., not on panel.
#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States

No. 6207.

Invoice dated Italy Cross, Canada, December 8, 1938.

Entered at Buffalo, N. Y., December 14, 1938.

Entry No. B-1691.

(Decided on rehearing [Reap. Dec. 6171] August 20, 1945)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (George B. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. Spector,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement was originally decided in the case of *C. J. Tower & Sons et al.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 6171. A timely rehearing motion, filed by counsel for the plaintiff, was granted.

*414Upon rehearing, it has been established that the Christmas trees involved in this appeal were purchased in a locality known as Italy Cross and that this locality is a part of the Bridgewater district of Nova Scotia, Canada.

I therefore find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the stipulated and agreed upon values as follows:

> *Invoice description of tree sizes per bundle Canadian*dollars, *per bundle of trees*

> 2-3'. . 5083

> 3-4'. . 5083

> 5-6'_ . 4857

> 7-8'. .4750

> 9-10'. . 5171

> 12'__ . 4658

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                         103
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1868
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1765)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1765
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1765)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1765)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1765)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.00)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Oil & Gas, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A1 for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
10-QSB/A1"), I, Andrew P. Calerich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-QSB/A1 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 10, 2004

/s/ Andrew P. Calerich
Andrew P. Calerich
Chief Financial Officer