alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20686]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request: Correction

AGENCY: Employment Standards Administration, DOL.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In notice document 97-19647, in the second column on page 
40117 in the issue of Friday, July 25, 1997, make the following 
correction, with respect to OMB Number: 1215-0028 (extension):
    Title: ``Optional Use Payroll Form Under the Davis Bacon Act'' 
should be changed to ``Economic Survey Schedule.''

    Dated: August 1, 1997.
John F. Saracco,
Acting Departmental Clearance Officer, Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 97-20686 Filed 8-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-27-M
Base Salaries of Named Executive Officers of the Registrant



 Exhibit 10.6 
 Base Salaries of Named Executive Officers of the Registrant 
 As of November 1, 2007, the following are the base
salaries (on an annual basis) of the named executive officers (as defined in Item 402 (a)(3) of Regulation S-K) of Old Point Financial Corporation: 
  

				
	 Robert F. Shuford
	  	$	254,000
	 Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
	  		
	 Old Point Financial Corporation
	  		
		
	 Louis G. Morris
	  	$	210,000
	 Executive Vice President/OPNB
	  		
	 Old Point Financial Corporation
	  		


			
		
	 Cary B. Epes
	  	Resigned as of March 1, 2007


				
	 Senior Vice President/Business Development & Lending
	  		
	 Old Point Financial Corporation
	  		
		
	 Margaret P. Causby
	  	$	145,000
	 Senior Vice President/Risk Management
	  		
	 Old Point Financial Corporation
	  		
		
	 Laurie D. Grabow
	  	$	140,000
	 Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President/Finance
	  		
	 Old Point Financial Corporation
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2599

BILLY EARL SMITH, JR., a/k/a Johnathan David

Smith,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM BYRD PRESS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CA-98-169)

Submitted: February 2, 1999 Decided: February 17, 1999

Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy Earl Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Daryl Eugene Webb, Jr.,

Kimberly W. Daniel, MAYS & VALENTINE, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Billy Earl Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his civil action in which he alleged discriminatory treatment,

defamation, and invasion of privacy. Our review of the record discloses that Smith failed to allege a federal cause of action and

that the district court did not have jurisdiction to consider

Smith’s potential state law claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (1994);

28 U.S.C.A. § 1332 (West 1993 & Supp. 1998).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We deny

Smith’s “Motion for Additional Information,” his “Motion of Explanation of Plaintiff’s Oral Argument of Transcript as Attachment of

Appeal and Informal Brief, etc.,” and his “Motion to Clerk’s Office

Involving Case.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 44419.

#### Protests 28286-K, etc., of Dal, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Stokby*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358) it was held that 10 percent allowance should have been made for the weight of the gelatinous material in question.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2417 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2417

     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain occupancy sensors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2012

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain occupancy sensors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN OCCUPANCY SENSORS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Switches designed   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        for lighting                                                       31/2015.......
                        control,
                        activated by dual
                        passive infrared
                        sensors that
                        detect the
                        presence of any
                        occupant of the
                        coverage area,
                        with lens masking
                        for adjusting the
                        field of view of
                        the sensors
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8536.50.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No. FAA - 2012 - 0005 Directorate ID: 2010 - SW - 091 - AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model AS332 L2 and EC225LP Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 4 Heli copters in the US Registry. 

### Reason : To preve nt failure of the main gearbox (MGB) due to the degradation of the epicyclic module of the MGB . Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 512,318 (on condition) Labor per Helicopter (1 x $85/work - hour) ( 0.2 x $ 8 5 /work - hour) (10 x $8 5 /work - hour) $85 (inspection of records) $ 17 (inspection of chip detector) $8 5 0 (replacement) Other (Explain) Assumption: One helicopter of the four in the US fleet will require replacement. Total Cost per Helicopter $ 17 (inspection only) f or one helicopter. $513,1 68 ( part and replacement) for one helicopter. Total US Fleet Cost $ 513, 236 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is th e AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer: Rao Edupuganti
(Reap Dec. 9096)

#### Chas. Kurz Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 13760.

(Decided March 14, 1958)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

La whence, Judge:

There was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, and the case was ordered submitted by the court.

*734Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 48929.

#### Protests 590511-G, etc., of H. Zimmerman & Sons, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Consolidated Statements of Operations found on
pages F-4 through F-5 of the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30,
1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          80,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  126,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,400
<INVENTORY>                                     16,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               224,300
<PP&E>                                         891,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                 547,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,019,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          156,900
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,500,000
<COMMON>                                     1,950,900
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,588,800)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,019,000
<SALES>                                      1,136,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,136,800
<CGS>                                          773,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,602,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (460,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (460,100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (460,100)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Charles L. McNew, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Halifax Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) (Intentionally omitted);c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:  7/6/07 /s/Charles L. McNew   Charles L. McNew   Chief Executive Officer
No. 46551.

#### Protest 48814-K of Swiss Trading Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Bullocks*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 110, C. D. 441) the merchandise in question was held not subject to countervailing duty as claimed.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));                and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                               |                                    |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                               | /s/ ROBERT                T. FABER |
|   | Robert                T. Faber                                                                     |
|   | *President                and Chief Executive Officer and**Chief                Financial Officer* |
|        |                                                                                               |

----
Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-66620), (No. 333-66123), (No. 333-66121), (No.
333-66119) and (No. 033-63865) of ATC Healthcare, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our
report dated May 12, 2003, except for the last paragraph of Note 6 as to which
the date is June 13, 2003, relating to the financial statements and financial
statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Melville, New York
June 13, 2003
BEFORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, DC

Application of

VIRGIN AMERICA INC.

for a statement ofauthorization under 14 C.F.R. Part 212 (U.S.-Singapore) ) ) ) ) Docket No. DOT-OST- 2012-0201 ) ) 

### ) )



# ______________________________ )

NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL CODE-SHARING

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

John Varley Senior Vice President &

General Counsel Virgin America Inc. 555 Airport Boulevard, Suite 500 Burlingame, CA 94010 Tel: (650) 762-7108 john.varley@virginamerica.com

AprilS, 2013 Malcolm L. Benge Jonathon H. Foglia Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger L.L.P. 888 Seventeenth Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20006 Tel: (202) 298-8660 Fax: (202) 342-0683 mlbenge@zsrlaw.com jhfoglia@zsrlaw.com

Counsel for Virgin America Inc.BEFORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, DC

Application of

VIRGIN AMERICA INC.

for a statement ofauthorization under 14 C.P.R. Part 212 (U.S.-Singapore) ) ) ) ) Docket No. DOT-OST- 2012-0201 ) 

### ) ) ) ___________________________________________________________________)

NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL CODE-SHARING

Further to the blanket statement ofauthorization granted in the above-captioned docket,

Virgin America Inc. ("Virgin America") hereby notifies the Department that, on or after 30 days

from today, Virgin America plans to display the "SQ" designator code ofSingapore Airlines Ltd.

("Singapore Airlines") on flights operatedbyVirgin America on the following routes, in

conjunction with Singapore Airlines' scheduled Singapore-U.S. services in foreign air

transportation (either non-stop or via third-country intermediate points):

From/To Los Angeles, California (LAX): Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas (DFW) San Jose, California (SJC)

From/To San Francisco, California (SFO): Chicago, Illinois (ORD) Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas (DFW) Portland, Oregon (PDX)April 5, 2013 Respectfully submitted,

# 11~e.~**~~-** Malcolm L. Benge Jonathon H. Foglia Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger L.L.P. 888 Seventeenth Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20006 Tel: (202) 298-8660 Fax: (202) 342-0683 mlbenge@zsrlaw.com jhfoglia@zsrlaw.com

Counsel for Virgin America Inc

2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Notice was served this 5th day of April, 2013, via email transmission on the following persons:

francis.heil@aa.com robert.wirick@aa.com rpommer@atlasair.com sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com sametta.c.bamett@delta.com ranjit.seth@evergreenairlines.com charters@evergreenairlines.com anbird@fedex.com gbleopard@fedex.com kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com peter.beckett@polaraircargo.com jonathan.linde@united.com steve.morrissey@united.com dan.weiss@united.com lhalloway@crowell.com (Counsel for United Air Lines) gmurphy@crowell.com (Counsel for United Air Lines) anita.mosner@hklaw.com (Counsel for United Parcel Service) jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com (Counsel for United Parcel Service) howard kass@usairways.com beniamin.slocum@usairways.com mlbenge@zsrlaw.com (Counsel for World Airways/North American Airlines) esta.rosenberg@dot.gov darren.jaffe@dot.gov brett.kruger@dot.gov info@airlineinfo.com
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Sino Clean Energy, Inc. on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), I, Baowen Ren, Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
  and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the date and for the periods
indicated.






Dated: August
      12, 2008
            
            
            /s/
      Baowen RenBaowen
      Ren
              Chief
      Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lawrence Financial Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report),

I, Jack Blair, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

        1. The report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




                                 /s/ Jack Blair
                           ----------------------------
                             Chief Executive Officer
                                   Jack Blair
                                 August 12, 2004




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       27
**Exhibit
        23.2**
 
 **Consent
        of the Independent Public Accounting Firm - Elliott Davis,
        LLC**
  
  **Exhibit
        23.2**
 
 
 **CONSENT
        OF INDPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 We
        have
        issued our report dated March 19, 2007, accompanying the consolidated financial
        statements included in the Annual Report of First Community Corporation on
        Form
        10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent to the
        incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of
        First
        Community Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 333-119630) and on Form S-8 (File
        No. 333-90603).
 
 
 
 /s/Elliott
        Davis, LLC
 Columbia,
        South Carolina
 March
        19,
        2007
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Oil & Gas, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A1 for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
10-QSB/A1"), I, Patrick D. O'Brien, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-QSB/A1 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB/A1 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 10, 2004

/s/ Patrick D. O'Brien
Patrick D. O'Brien
Chief Executive Officer