alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the First Division,

May 13, 1943

No. 48274.

#### Petition 6308-R of White Lamb Finlay, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

When the case was called for trial the manager of the petitioning corporation testified that the entry involved had been the subject of a test case to determine the question of whether prices quoted for future manufacture and delivery of merchandise not then in existence may be considered in connection with export value as defined in section 402 (d), the plaintiff supporting the negative of this proposition. The decision ultimately reached was adverse to the claim of the plaintiff. The examiner who passed the merchandise testified that the importer-petitioner had given the customs officials all the information available and that its representatives had cooperated with the utmost good faith. On the record the petition was granted.
#### Carson Pirie Scott & Co. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6905.

Entry No. 6441, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, May 23, 1946,, etc.

Certified May 23, 1946, etc.

Entered at Chicago, Ill., June 19, 1946,' etc.

(Decided February 20, 1947)

*Wallace & Schwarts (Joseph Schwartz*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, David Savitsky, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended annual report (this "annual report") on Form
10-K/A of ATC Healthcare, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to be  designed  under  our
supervision,  to ensure that material  information  relating to the  registrant,
including its  consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within
those  entities,  particularly  during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;

                  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure  controls  and  presented  in this report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls and  procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report; and

                  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial  reporting that occurred during the registrant's
fourth Fiscal quarter that has materially  affected,  or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

                  (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation
of internal  controls over financial  reporting  which are reasonably  likely to
adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to record,  process,  summarize and
report financial information; and

                  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other  employees who have a significant  role in the  registrant's
internal controls.

Date: September 26, 2005
                                                      /s/ DAVID SAVITSKY
                                                     -------------------------
                                                     David Savitsky
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20307]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Willamette Provincial Interagency Executive Committee (PIEC), 
Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Willamette PIEC Advisory Committee will meet on Thursday, 
August 21, 1997. The meeting will be held at the Oregon State 
University LaSalle Stewart Conference Center, Agricultural Sciences 
meeting room; Corvallis, Oregon 97301; phone (541) 737-2402. The 
meeting is scheduled to begin at 9:00 a.m., and will conclude at 
approximately 4:00 p.m. The agenda includes: Three panels discussing 
various aspects of municipal watersheds and their management in the 
Willamette Province. The panels will include: municipal water 
providers, hydrologists and other scientists, and natural resource 
managers. The agenda will also include a 30 minute presentation on the 
area control method of timber scheduling.
    The public forum is tentatively scheduled to begin at 3:00 p.m. 
Time allotted for individual presentations will be limited to 3 
minutes. Written comments are encouraged. Written comments may be 
submitted prior to the meeting by sending them to Designated Federal 
Official Neal Forrester at the address given below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For more information regarding this meeting, contact Designated Federal 
Official Neal Forrester; Willamette National Forest, 211 East Seventh 
Avenue; Eugene, Oregon 97401; (541) 465-6924.

    Dated: July 28, 1997.
Randy A. Dunbar,
RL&M Staff Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-20307 Filed 7-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```
# C_2014151EN.01000601.xml

| 19.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel de Versailles — France) — Le Rayon d’Or SARL v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances

(Case C-151/13) (1)

1

((Request for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - VAT - Scope - Determination of the taxable amount - Concept of ‘subsidy directly linked to the price’ - Payment of a lump sum by the national sickness insurance fund to residential care homes for the elderly))

2014/C 151/07

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour administrative d’appel de Versailles

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Le Rayon d’Or SARL

Applicant:

Defendant: Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Cour administrative d'appel de Versailles — Interpretation of Article 11A(1)(a) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value-added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1), repeated in Article 73 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1) — Scope of VAT — Subsidy directly linked to the cost of providing healthcare — Inclusion of the ‘healthcare lump sum’ paid by the sickness insurance funds to residential care homes for the elderly.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 11A(1)(a) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value-added tax: uniform basis of assessment and Article 73 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that a lump-sum payment such as the ‘healthcare lump sum’ at issue in the main proceedings constitutes the consideration for the healthcare provided for consideration by a residential care home for the elderly to its residents and, on that basis, falls within the scope of value added tax.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.

1

---
June 12, 1950

No. 54409.

#### Allied Food Corporatian of America *v.*United States,

protest 134467-K.

C. D. 1240. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# New video shows effort to support National Defense Stockpile 

DLA Disposition Services

                Battle Creek, Michigan  –              
One of The Defense Logistics Agency’s newest videos tells the story of how DLA Disposition Services and other DLA major subordinate commands supports the National Defense Stockpile in the recovery and recycling of strategic materials suitable for stockpiling.

The video featuring DLA Disposition Services’ own Guy Stutzman can be viewed at &t=186s

A DLA LogLines article on the subject is planned for publication in early 2019.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### S. H. Pomerance Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 7908.

Entry No. 715857, etc.

(Decided November 17, 1950)

*Murray Sprung & Benjamin Sprung*for the plaintiffs.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

La whence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the merchandise the subject of these appeals are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Gothic Watch Co.,*23 Cust. Ct. 235, Reap. Dec. 7712, affirming the judgment in *Gothic Watch Co.*v. *United States,*19 Cust. Ct. 309, Reap. Dec. 7438, and that the record in Reap. Dec. 7712, *supra,*may be incorporated herein.

.Upon the agreed facts, I find that the attempted appraisement embodied in the second return of value by the appraiser of the merchandise covered by each of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the annexed schedule, which is marked “A” and made a part of this decision, was illegal, null, and void, and that the appraiser’s original return of value in each case, as reported by him to the collector of customs, constituted his appraisal of the merchandise pursuant to section 500 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1500), and was final and conclusive in the absence of any appeal pursuant to section 501 of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1501).

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





We
      the
      undersigned, Ofer Arbib, Chief Executive Officer and Director of DCI USA, Inc.
      (the “Company”), and Jonathan Rigbi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
      §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that, to our knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
      the
      quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
      in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                May 20, 2008
            
            
            By:
            /s/
                Ofer ArbibOfer
                Arbib
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)By:
            /s/
                Jonathan RigbiJonathan
                Rigbi
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Supplement as of 10/31/2007 to the Contract for Consortium Credit dtd 11/7/2003



 Exhibit 10.2 
 Supplement
to the 
 CONTRACT 
 concerning a consortium
loan of 
 € 6,000,000 
 between 
 Lydall Gerhardi GmbH & Co. KG

 as borrower 
 (the
“borrower” or “Lydall Gerhardi”) 
 and 
 Lydall Holding Deutschland GmbH 
 as co-obligor 
 (the “co-obligor”) 
 and 
 Deutsche Bank AG 
 as mandated lead arranger and agent

 (the “agent”)  
 and

 the banks named herein 
 as lenders 

 (the “lenders”) 
 and a simultaneous
supplement to the Securities Pool Contract as per Appendix 3 of the contract. 







 The parties made a verbal agreement on 09/25/2007 to extend the loan and to postpone the final date of redemption to 10/31/2007.
This contract is to be further extended by this supplement. 
 That said, the borrower, the co-obligor, the agent and the lenders agree the following amendments to the
contract: 
 To § 1 of the contract: 
 The
“final date of redemption” is 09/30/2011 
 The “margin” is 1.5% p.a. above the respectively applicable EONIA 
 To Appendix IV of the contract: 
  

	 	    	The claims withdrawal and prolongation declaration issued by Lydall Inc. to Lydall Deutschland Holding GmbH was released by the declaration of 06/20/2006. 

 The remaining regulations of the contract remain unaltered. 
 This supplement does not become
effective until the agent has received the copy of the guarantee signed by Lydall Inc. (the “guarantor”) as per Appendix 1 to this supplement before expiry of 11/30/2007. 
 The borrower: 
  

					
	 /s/    Lydall Gerhardi GmbH & Co. KG
	 	October 31, 2007	 	

 The co-obligor: 
  

					
	 /s/    Lydall Deutschland Holding GmbH
	 	October 29, 2007	 	

 The agent: 
  

					
	 /s/    Deutsche Bank AG
	 	October 31, 2007	 	

 The banks: 
  

					
	 /s/    Deutsche Bank AG
	 	October 31, 2007	 	

  

					
	 /s/    Volksbank Meinerzhagen eG
	 	October 31, 2007	 	

 The guarantor: 
  

					
	 /s/    Lydall, Inc.
	 	October 29, 2007
No. 47123.

#### Protests 830297-G, etc., of W. Bohne & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

## _
REGION
Ill 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

1PR
2 9 ZO1 Mr. Au Mirzakhalili, Program Administrator Air Quality Management Section Division of Air and Waste Management Delaware Department
of Natural Resources and Environmental Control 156 South State Street Dover, Delaware 19901 Dear Mr. Mirzakhalili: On June 3, 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revised theheathbased National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) by establishing a new 1-hour standard
at a level of 75 parts per billion (ppb). This new 1-hour standard will protect public health by reducing people’s exposure
to high short-term (5-minutes

to 24-hours) concentrations

of SO 2 . An area meets the new standard when the 3-year average of the

99 th percentile of 1-hour daily maximum concentrations does not exceed 75 ppb. Section 107(d)(l) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) describes the process EPA follows for designating areas as meeting or not meeting

a new or revised NAAQS. Within one year of establishing

a new or revised standard, each governor must recommend

a designation
of attainment, nonattainment

or unclassifiable, with appropriate boundaries, for areas within their jurisdiction. Therefore, we ask that your state provide designation recommendations, including appropriate area boundaries, for all areas by June 3, 2011, with respect to the 1-hour SO 2 NAAQS. The enclosed memorandum provides guidance
to state and local air pollution control agencies and tribes on the timeline and process for designating areas, under the revised SO 2 standard. We plan to announce our intended designations
no later than 120 days prior to promulgating

final designations. Following the announcement

of intended designations, states and tribes will have the opportunity

to comment on any modifications EPA proposes
to their recommendations. EPA intends to complete designations
by no later than June 3, 2012. Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free. Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474Establishing area designations

is a key step in the process of providing the health protection intended by the CAA. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me or have your staff contact Ms. Irene Shandruk

at (215) 814-2166
or Ms. Ruth Knapp at (215) 814-2191. Sincerely, Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division Enclosure cc: Mr. Ron Amirikian, Planning Program Manager Division of Air and Waste Management, Air Quality Section, DNREC 

## C) Printed on 1110% recycled/recyclable paper vith 100% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free. Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
No. 42178.

#### Protest 987589-G of Tama Trading Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On the authority of Abstract 39071 it was held that an allowance should have been made in the weight of *the*cheese for *the*inedible covering.
ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 12-14-00205-CR OFFENSE: 3

Charles Edward Lusk v. The State

STYLE: of Texas COUNTY: Smith

fess->sr

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 241st District Court

DATE: 4/30/2015 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 241-0127-14

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Charles Edward Lusk v. The State of

STYLE: Texas

PKO £E Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE:

JUDGE:

T /-

f&

CCA#:

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

fc$7-/5

118-/5"

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Marc Joseph MALFARA, Respondent.

No. 468 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Oct. 28, 1998.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 28th day of October 1998, upon consideration of an Order of the Disciplinary Board dated September 21,1998, it is hereby

ORDERED that MARC JOSEPH MAL-FARA be subjected to PUBLIC CENSURE by the Supreme Court.

*733It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
----

----

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  May 17, 2010 |   |   /s/Jeffrey S. Keuntjes |
|--------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                           |   | Jeffrey S. Keuntjes           |
|                           |   | Vice President - Finance      |
|                           |   | (principal financial officer) |

----

----
exv10w2



 






Exhibit 10.2




AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.




Amendment to Compensation of Non-Employee Directors



On
September 19, 2007, at a duly called and held meeting of the Board of Directors of
AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (the “Company”), the Board voted, beginning on September 30, 2007, to
increase the cash payment each Non-Employee Director of the Company shall receive as compensation
for his or her services as a Director of the Company on or promptly after September 30, December
31, March 31 and June 30 of each year (or the next business day if such date is not a business
day), from $10,000 to $12,500.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No.333-92419 on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-74677 on Form S-8, Registration
No. 333-77099 on Form S-8 and Registration No. 333-81513 on Form S-3 of Xceed
Inc., of our report dated March 20, 2000 (which expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to restatement of the
1999 financial statements described in Note 2.s.), appearing in this Annual
Report o Form 10-K/A of Xceed Inc. for the year ended August 31, 1999.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York
April 10, 2000

                                       1