alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015107EN.01001201.xml

| 30.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 February 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep — Netherlands) — H.J. Mertens v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen

(Case C-655/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social security - Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Article 71 - Concept of a ‘partially unemployed frontier worker’ - Refusal of the Member State of residence and of the competent Member State to grant unemployment benefit))

(2015/C 107/15)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Centrale Raad van Beroep

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: H.J. Mertens

Defendant: Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen

Operative part of the judgment

Article 71(1)(a)(i) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1606/98 of 29 June 1998, must be interpreted as meaning that a frontier worker who, immediately after the end of a full-time employment relationship with an employer in a Member State, is employed on a part-time basis by another employer in that same Member State has the status of a partially unemployed frontier worker within the meaning of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 78, 15.3.2014.

---
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Charles L. McNew, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Halifax Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) (Intentionally omitted);  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sforth fiscal quarter in the case of any annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting        Date: July 13, 2005 /s/CharlesL. McNew   Charles L. McNew   Chief Executive Officer
#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

No. 8117.

Entry Nos. 7384; 3926; 1420.

(Decided May 22, 1952)

*Sharretts, Hillis & Paley (Howard C. Carter*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon tbe following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, that the market value or the price, at the time of exportation to the United States of the earthenware articles covered by the Appeals to Reappraisement enumerated on schedule “A” hereto attached and made part hereof, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of. trade, for exportation to the United States, plus the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States, was in each instance the appraised value less the amount added to meet advances made by the Appraiser in similar cases and that there is no higher foreign value.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that these appeals to reappraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be- the proper basis for the determination of the value of the earthenware articles here involved, and that such value in each instance was the appraised value, less the amount added to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases.

Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
**We will require the carrier to institute service in the Los Angeles-Mexico City, Miami-Mexico 

City, Los Angeles-Guadalajara, and Miami-Guadalajara markets no later than November 19,

2013. We acted on this motion without awaiting the expiration of the answer period with the 

consent of all parties served with the request.

Approved under assigned authority on

August 20, 2013**

Director, Office of International Aviation
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1790 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1790

To modify the Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness Plan to provide 
   that the full statement of budget resources of the Department of 
Defense is complete and validated by not later than September 30, 2014.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2011

Ms. Ayotte (for herself and Mr. McCain) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To modify the Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness Plan to provide 
   that the full statement of budget resources of the Department of 
Defense is complete and validated by not later than September 30, 2014.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Department of Defense Audit 
Readiness Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. AUDIT READINESS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DEPARTMENT OF 
              DEFENSE.

    Section 1003(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 123 Stat. 2440; 10 U.S.C. 2222 
note) is amended by inserting ``, and that a complete and validated 
full statement of budget resources is ready by not later than September 
30, 2014'' after ``validated as ready for audit by not later than 
September 30, 2017''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2014395EN.01001102.xml

| 10.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 395/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 395/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije — Slovenia) — Damijan Vnuk v Zavarovalnica Triglav d.d.

(Case C-162/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles - Directive 72/166/EEC - Article 3(1) - Concept of ‘use of vehicles’ - Accident caused in the courtyard of a farm by a tractor to which a trailer was attached))

(2014/C 395/14)

Language of the case: Slovenian

Referring court

Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Damijan Vnuk

Defendant: Zavarovalnica Triglav d.d.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(1) of Council Directive 72/166/EEC of 24 April 1972 on the approximation of the laws of Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and to the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘use of vehicles’ in that article covers any use of a vehicle that is consistent with the normal function of that vehicle. That concept may therefore cover the manoeuvre of a tractor in the courtyard of a farm in order to bring the trailer attached to that tractor into a barn, as in the case in the main proceedings, which is a matter for the referring court to determine.

---

(1)  OJ C 156, 1.6.2013.

---
The final version of the proposed plan, technical support document and all supporting 

material can be found on the www.regulations.gov web site. 

EPA will be accepting comments on the proposed plan until July 2, 2012. Please identify 

your comments with the following docket ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0345

Federal Rulemaking Portal:

http://www.regulations.gov

follow the online instructions for submitting comments

E-mail written comments to: 

nudd.gregory@epa.gov

Do not submit information that you consider to be Confidential Business Information or 

otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail.

Mail or hand-deliver written comments to1: 

Gregory Nudd (AIR-2) 

U.S. EPA, Region 9 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

Submit oral and/or written comments and data at EPA’s Public Hearing:

June 1, 2012

5:30-7:30 p.m.

Waiakea High School in the Cafeteria

155 W. Kawili St.

Hilo, Hawaii 96720

 1 Hand and courier deliveries are only accepted Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m., 

excluding Federal holidays. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed 

information.

							HOW	DO	I	COMMENT	ON	THE	PROPOSAL?	 							STATE	OF	HAWAII

							REGIONAL	HAZE

							PROPOSED	FEDERAL	IMPLEMENTATION	PLAN
#### CRANE v. FISH.

December 12, 1837.

*Rule to shoio cause of action, and why defendant should not be discharged on common bail.*

An affidavit to hold to bail, averring *“*that the defendant is justly and truly indebted to the plaintiff, in the sum of-dollars, for work, labour, and materials, done and furnished,” is insufficient,

THE affidavit did not aver that the work was done, or the materials furnished, either at the *request of,*or *to,*or *for the defendant.*

*166The Court

made the rule absolute, and discharged the defendant on common bail.

See the index, as to cases on affidavits to hold to bail, reported in tliis volume.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
     CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Each of the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Emageon Inc. hereby individually certifies that the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Emageon Inc.

      In witness whereof, each of the undersigned has executed and delivered
this Certification on this 23rd day of May, 2005.

/s/ Charles A. Jett, Jr.                  /s/ W. Randall Pittman
-------------------------------           --------------------------------------
Charles A. Jett, Jr.                      W. Randall Pittman
Chief Executive Officer                   Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer)             (Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 147 (Thursday, July 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20086]



[[Page 41029]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Withdrawal of Surplus Land at Military Installations Designated 
for Realignment: Naval Air Station, Key West, Florida

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice provides information on withdrawal of surplus 
property at the Naval Air Station, Key West, Florida.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1995, the Naval Air Station, Key West, 
Florida was designated for realignment pursuant to the Defense Base 
Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, Public Law 101-510, as amended. 
Pursuant to this designation, in April of 1996, approximately 168.14 
acres of land and related facilities at this installation were declared 
surplus to the federal government and available for use by (a) non-
federal public agencies pursuant to various statutes which authorize 
conveyance of property for public projects, and (b) homeless provider 
groups pursuant to the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act (42 
U.S.C. 11411), as amended. Approximately 35 acres of land improved with 
10 buildings have been requested for transfer by other federal agencies 
and was not included within the 168.14 acres. On July 3, 1997, a second 
determination was made to withdraw land and facilities previously 
reported as surplus that are now required by the federal government.

Notice of Surplus Property

    Pursuant to paragraph (7)(B) of section 2905(b) of the Defense Base 
Closure and Realignment Act of l990, as amended by the Base Closure 
Community Redevelopment and Homeless Assistance Act of 1994, the 
following information regarding the withdrawal of previously reported 
surplus property at the Naval Air Station, Key West, FL is published in 
the Federal Register:

Description of Withdrawn Property

    The following is a description of land and facilities at the Naval 
Air Station, Key West that are withdrawn from surplus by the federal 
government.

Land

    Approximately 16 acres of improved and unimproved fee simple land 
at the Naval Air Station, Key West, FL known as the Trumbo Point Annex 
Tank Farm.

Buildings

    The following is a summary of the facilities located on the above 
described land. Electrical distribution substations and the fuel farm 
maintenance facility consisting of 10 buildings.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John J. Kane, Director, Department of 
the Navy, Real Estate Operations, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 
200 Stovall Street, Alexandria, VA 22332-2300, telephone (703) 428-
0436, or E.R. Nelson, Jr., Director, Real Estate Division, Southern 
Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, P.O. Box 190010, 2155 
Eagle Drive, North Charleston, SC 29419-9010, telephone (803) 820-7494.

    Dated: July 21, 1997.
M.D. Sutton,
LCDR, JAGC, USN, Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-20086 Filed 7-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
Exhibit 31.2

                            FORM 10-QSB CERTIFICATION

         I, Walter Tatum, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB/A of Cyberads,
Inc. for the quarter ending March 31, 2005;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Cyberads, Inc. as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for Cyberads, Inc. and have:

         A. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to Cyberads, Inc., including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         B. Not Required.

         C. Evaluated the effectiveness of Cyberads, Inc.'s disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         D. Not Required.

         5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         A. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect Cyberads, Inc.'s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         B. Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees who have a significant  role in  Cyberads, Inc.'s
internal control over financial reporting.


Date: January 30, 2006           CYBERADS, INC.

                                 By: /s/ WALTER TATUM
                                 --------------------------
                                 Walter Tatum
                                 Chief Financial Officer
NODC        All of       NOAA          You are here: NODC Home > Ocean Climate       Laboratory > OCL Products > BSA 1998       > Observations density Temperature observation density (1 dot = 10 stations)Temperature & salinity observation density (1 dot =       10 stations)Temperature & salinity & oxygen observation       density (1 dot = 1 station)Access Data - Submit Data - Site Map -       Intended Use       of the Data? - Online       Store - Customer       ServiceLast modified:    Wed,       3-Oct-2007 20:21 UTC NODC.Webmaster@noaa.govDept. of Commerce - NOAA - NESDIS - NODC      *       External link: You will be leaving the       Federal   Government by following an external       link.Privacy       Policy - Disclaimer - Information QualityFreedom of       Information Act (FOIA)      USA.gov - The U.S. Government's       Web Portal
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41366-41367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20378]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[Docket No.; I.D. 072597C]


Endangered Fish and Wildlife; Draft Recovery Plan for the Blue 
Whale

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 41367]]

SUMMARY: The draft Recovery Plan for the North Pacific and North 
Atlantic blue whale (Balaenoptera musculus) is available for review and 
comment by interested parties prior to preparing the final plan for 
approval and adoption by NMFS. The Plan was developed by a team of 
scientists from NMFS' Southwest Fisheries Science Center (SWFSC).

DATES: DATES: Comments on the draft Plan must be received on or before 
September 30, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Chief, Marine Mammal 
Division, Office of Protected Resources (F/PR), 1315 East-West
    Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910. Copies of the Draft Blue Whale 
Recovery Plan are available upon request from F/PR, NMFS, 1315 East-
West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg Silber, NMFS/FPR, 301/713-2322.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA; 16 
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires that NMFS develop and implement recovery 
plans for the conservation and survival of threatened and endangered 
species under its jurisdiction, unless it is determined that such plans 
will not promote the conservation of the species. Accordingly, NMFS 
appointed a group of scientists at SWFSC to take part in the 
development of the Draft Recovery Plan for the North Pacific and North 
Atlantic Blue Whale. The Draft Recovery Plan discusses the natural 
history, current status of the species, and the known and potential 
human impacts on the species. Actions that would promote the recovery 
of the blue whale are identified and discussed in the draft plan. The 
Recovery Plan will be used to direct U.S. activities, as well as 
encourage international cooperation, to promote the recovery of this 
endangered species.

    Dated: July 29, 1997.
Patricia A. Montanio,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 97-20378 Filed 7-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F