alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014202EN.01001601.xml

| 30.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/16

---

Order of the President of the Court of 13 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy — Poland) — Polska Izba Informatyki i Telekomunikacji v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej, in the presence of: P4 Sp. z o.o., Krajowa Izba Gospodarcza Elektroniki i Telekomunikacji

in the presence of:

(Case C-633/13) (1)

1

2014/C 202/19

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 71, 8. 3. 2014.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2326 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 577
112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2326

To designate the new United States courthouse in Buffalo, New York, as 
          the ``Robert H. Jackson United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 19, 2012

Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mrs. Gillibrand) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

                           December 27, 2012

               Reported by Mrs. Boxer, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the new United States courthouse in Buffalo, New York, as 
          the ``Robert H. Jackson United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse at 2 Niagara Square, Buffalo, New 
York, shall be known and designated as the ``Robert H. Jackson United 
States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert H. 
Jackson United States Courthouse''.
                                                       Calendar No. 577

112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2326

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To designate the new United States courthouse in Buffalo, New York, as 
          the ``Robert H. Jackson United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 27, 2012

                       Reported without amendment
```
Before the Second Division,

April 30, 1942

No. 47134.

#### Protests 42513-K, etc., of Armand Schwab & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the hemp knotted straw hats in question are similar to those involved in Abstract 46497. In accordance therewith the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was sustained.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 
  1)
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Emageon Inc. ;2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15
(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other




---



##### 



employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
 Date: August 9, 2006
    
    /s/ W. Randall Pittman.W. Randall PittmanChief Financial Officerand Treasurer(Principal Financial andAccounting Officer)
No. 47761.

#### Protest 881189-G of Graef & Schmidt, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *Guth Stern & Co.*(21 C. C. P. A. 246, T. D. 46777) the claim at 271⁄2 percent under paragraph 372 was sustained.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                                  AS ENACTED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Third Wave Technologies, Inc. (the "Company) Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John Puisis, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and James Herrmann, Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C Section 1350, that on the date of this certification:

      (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

      (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                     /s/ John Puisis
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     John Puisis
                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                     May 10, 2005

                                     /s/ James Herrmann
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     James Herrmann
                                     Principal Financial Officer
                                     May 10, 2005

                                       19
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 144 (Monday, July 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40343]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19754]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-421-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

July 22, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 18, 1997, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern) tendered for filing to become part of Northern's FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets 
proposed to be effective August 1, 1997:

Second Revised Sheet No. 400
Second Revised Sheet No. 412
Second Revised Sheet No. 424
Third Revised Sheet No. 431
Third Revised Sheet No. 441
Third Revised Sheet No. 446

    Northern states that the above-referenced tariff sheets contained 
proposed changes to the banking address for shipper payments to 
Northern.
    Northern states that copies of the filing were served upon the 
company's customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such petitions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken in this proceeding, but will not serve 
to make protestant a party to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-19754 Filed 7-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 150 (Tuesday, August 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42114]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20524]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ID-2958-001]


Dennis R. Hendrix; Notice of Filing

July 30, 1997.
    Take notice that on June 18, 1997, Dennis R. Hendrix filed an 
application for authorization under Section 305(b) of the Federal Power 
Act to hold the following positions:

Director, Duke Energy Corporation
Director, Texas Commerce Bank, N.A.

    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before August 11, 1997. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20524 Filed 8-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 42130.

#### Protests 618030-G, etc., of S. Galle & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 40880 the protests were sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2

NOBEL LEARNING COMMUNITIES, INC.

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection with the Annual Report of Nobel Learning Communities, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended July 1, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Thomas Frank, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that based on my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|                                          
|/s/ Thomas Frank                          
|Name: Thomas Frank Chief Financial Officer

Date: September 15, 2006
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8

                              LADD FURNITURE, INC.

                         1999 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN

                                 PLAN HIGHLIGHTS

1.   Incentive payments based on financial performance and individual
     performance as follows:

               For Corporate Participants

                    --  achievement of PBTDA targets
                    --  achievement of individual objectives

               For Operating Group and Company Participants

                    --  achievement of PBTDA targets
                    --  LADD PBTDA targets
                    --  achievement of individual objectives

2.   No individual objective incentive payments will be made to any individual
     if the operating unit to which the individual is assigned does not achieve
     minimum PBTDA targets. Incentive payment expense will be accrued in results
     before calculation of profit.

3.   Total of 153 officers and key managers to participate in the plan (Exhibit
     I). Maximum incentives range from 20% to 120% of January 1, 1999 base
     salary. Incentive payments are based on achieving performance criteria
     established by senior management and approved by the Board of Directors.

4.   Program includes $50,000 discretionary incentive pool for extraordinary
     performance by LADD employees not covered by the Management Incentive Plan.

5.   Estimated incentive payout at planned performance levels is $6.1 million.

6.   Incentives earned in 1998 will be paid in cash after completion of annual
     audit (not later than March 31, 2000).

7.   In the event of a transfer of a participant during the fiscal year to an
     operating unit other than the unit in which originally a Plan participant,
     an appropriate adjustment will be made in Incentive Plan eligibility
     pro-rata for the time worked in each unit.

8.   In the event of a promotion of a participant within the same operating
     unit, an appropriate adjustment will be made in Incentive Plan eligibility
     pro-rata. In the event of a demotion which would place participants in a
     position substantially different from that in which they were nominated as
     a participant, an appropriate adjustment may be made as to the amount of
     incentive payment for which they are eligible as determined by the
     Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

9.   Participants will forfeit all income from plan if employment is terminated
     prior to January 1, 2000 for any reason other than death, disability or
     retirement (over age 55).

10.  The 1999 Management Incentive Plan only applies to fiscal year 1999.
Exhibit 31.3



Certification Of

Chief Executive Officer

Of NATCO Group Inc.

Pursuant To 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, As Adopted

Pursuant To
Section 302 Of The

Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002



I, John U. Clarke, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of NATCO Group Inc. (the Registrant);



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



|                        |  |                                       
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: December 21, 2005 |  | /s/ John U. Clarke                    
|                        |  | John U. Clarke Chief Executive
Officer
Publications

INTRODUCTION

KEY QUESTIONS IN ESA EVALUATIONS

Two key questions must be addressed in determining whether a listing under the ESA is warranted:

- Is the entity in question a "species" as defined by the ESA?   
- 2) If so, is the "species" threatened or endangered? 

The "Species" Question

distinct population segments

Thresholds for Threatened or Endangered Status

Hatchery Fish and Wild Fish

Fig. 1
1

SUMMARY OF BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION

Life History Characteristics

Fig. 1
2
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Environmental Features

Past and Present Distribution and Abundance

Fig. 2
Fig. 1
Table 1
Fig. 2
Table 2

Straying

Artificial Propagation

Table 3
Table 4
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Table 5
Table 6
Table 6
Table 5
Figure 3
3
Table 2
Table 5

Continue to rest of document.

Table of Contents
(Reap. Dec. 9966)

#### Milnor’s W. J. Byrnes & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 2896.

(Decided April 5, 1961)

*Stein & Sho stale*for the plaintiffs.

*William, H. Orriclc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

The appeal for reappraisement'listed in schedule “A,” attached to and made a part hereof, has been submitted for decision upon stipulation of counsel for the parties to the effect that there was no foreign value, export value, or United States value, as defined in section 402 (c), (d), and' (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and that the cost of production, as defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, for each of the item numbers or other description of the merchandise listed in said schedule “A,” attached to and made a part hereof, was as shown in schedule “A” for each respective export period specified therein.

*651On the agreed facts, I find cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the values of the merchandise listed in schedule “A” and that such value for each of the item numbers or other description of the merchandise was as shown in schedule “A,” for each respective export period specified therein.

The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all items of merchandise not listed in schedule “A,” to that extent, the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
#### North American Mercantile Co. *v.*United States

No. 6000.

Invoices dated Tokio, Japan, July 21 and September 15, 1939.

Certified July 21 and September 15, 1939.

Entered at New York, N. Y., August 23 and October 19, 1939

Entry Nos. 721974 and 740866.

(Decided May 8, 1944)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I, Auster,*special attorney). for the defendant.

Cole, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been limited by written stipulation filed on April 27, 1944, to canned clams packed *4455 ounces to the tin, and represented by the invoice items marked A and initialed FHL, the parties agreeing that said merchandise is thé same in all material respects as the clams packed 5 ounces to the can which were involved in *United States*v. *Mutual Supply Co. et al.*and *Mutual Supply Co. et al.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 5950, and that the record therein may be incorporated here.

In the cited case appraisement was made on the basis of American selling price, section 402 (g) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (g)), pursuant to the provisions of a Presidential proclamation, T. D. 47031, which decreed such basis for appraisement of “clams other than razor clams” to equalize the differences in-cost of production between foreign products and like or similar ones of domestic origin.

It is further agreed between the parties that the market conditions and prices in this country, relating to the instant merchandise, were the same at the time of its exportation, as -those established in the incorporated case.

On the stipulated facts, I hold American selling price as defined in Bection 402 (g), *supra,*to be the proper basis for appraisement for the merchandise referred to, and that such statutory value is $1 per dozen cans, less IK per centum cash discount.

The appeals having been abandoned as to all other'merchandise, they are dismissed so far as they relate thereto.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Page 1 of 4 

P-08-0733/0734 11/7/2008

Revised according to Engineering Report.p080733c.eng.doc, 11/5/2008 

Assessor: Lynn Delpire

Production Volume: 

USES: 

OTHER USES: 

Chemical Name: 
STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Page 2 of 4 

P-08-0733/0734 11/7/2008

 

General Population and Environmental Exposure 

A qualitative evaluation of the releases estimated by CEB indicates that there is some 

potential for exposure to the general population and the environment from incineration releases. 

 Human inhalation exposure may result from the incineration releases.

 It 

is recommended that the submitter work with EPA engineers, fate experts and exposure assessors 

to develop chemical-specific testing for this PMN chemical. 
 STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Page 3 of 4 

P-08-0733/0734 11/7/2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 STANDARD REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Page 4 of 4 

P-08-0733/0734 11/7/2008
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos.333-76482 and 333-70534) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-102003, 333-90676, 333-45258 and 333-36392) of Paradigm Genetics, Inc. of our report dated January 31, 2003 relating to the financial statements, which appears inthis Form 10-K. 

 

/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

 

Raleigh, North Carolina 

March 27, 2003
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of Coventure International
  Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended April
  30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (the Report), I, John Hromyk, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
  Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                          
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                          
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|Dated: June 18, 2004 | By: | /s/JOHN HROMYK             
|-------------------- | --- | ---------------------------
|                     |     |                            
|                     |     | John Hromyk                
|                     |     | Chief Executive Officer and
|                     |     | Chief Financial Officer    

---