alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES
                     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                 FORM 10-K/A

                                   (Mark One)
[X]    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
                                   ACT OF 1934
                  For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998

[ ]  TRANSITION  REPORT  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  13 OR 15(d) OF THE  SECURITIES
                               EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                 For the transition period from to ________.

                          Commission file number  0-11774

                              INVESTORS TITLE COMPANY
                (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

     North Carolina                                         56-1110199
(State or other jurisdiction of                            (I.R.S. Employer
    incorporation or organization)                        Identification No.)

              121 North Columbia Street, Chapel Hill, North Carolina  27514
                  (Address of principal executive offices)

        Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (919) 968-2200

           Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:

    Common Stock, no par value                      None
(Title of each class)             (Name of the exchange on which registered)

       Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange  Act of
1934  during  the  preceding  12 months  (or for such  shorter  period  that the
registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  X   No
                                              --- 
         Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent  filers  pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained  herein,  and will not be contained,
to the best of  registrant's  knowledge,  in  definitive  proxy  or  information
statements  incorporated  by  reference  in  Part  III of the  Form  10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. ______

On March 1, 1999, the aggregate  market value of the voting and nonvoting common
equity held by nonaffiliates of the registrant was $53,142,021.

On March 1, 1999, the number of common shares outstanding was 2,810,349.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Documents                                            Form 10-K Reference
---------                                            -------------------
Portions of Annual Report to Shareholders           Part I,  Items 1 and 2
for fiscal year ended December 31, 1998             Part II, Items 5 - 8
                                                    Part IV, Item 14
Portions of Proxy Statement (in connection
with Annual Meeting                                 Part III, Items 10 - 13
to be held on May 11, 1999)
Location of Exhibit Index: The Index to Exhibits
is contained in Part IV herein
on page 14.
# C_2013260EN.01004201.xml

| 7.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/42

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 5 July 2013 — Zweckverband Tierkörperbeseitigung v Commission

(Case T-309/12 R)

(Interim measures - Payment of contributions to an association governed by public law - State aid - Obligation to recover - Application to suspend enforcement - Urgency)

2013/C 260/74

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Zweckverband Tierkörperbeseitigung in Rhineland-Palatinate, Saarland, Rheingau-Taunus-Kreis and Landkreis Limburg-Weilburg (Rivenich, Germany) (represented by: A. Kerkmann, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Sauer and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Saria Bio Industries AG & Co. KG (Selm, Germany); SecAnim GmbH (Lünen, Germany); and Knochen- und Fett-Union (KFU) GmbH (Selm) (represented by: U. Karpenstein and C. Johann, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of enforcement of Commission Decision (2102/485/EU) of 25 April 2012 on State aid SA.25051 (C 19/10) (ex NN 23/2010) granted by Germany to the Zweckverband Tierkörperbeseitigung in Rhineland-Palatinate, Saarland, Rheingau-Taunus-Kreis and Landkreis Limburg-Weilburg (OJ 2012 L 236, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2011-1253

 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM079AD

A320-57-1118, R04 --- 6/4/08

A320-57A1166 --- 1/12/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
[No. 14456.

Department One.

April 16, 1918.]

#### Spokane Taxicab Company, *Appellant,*v. John B. White, *as Prosecuting Attorney for Spokane County, et al.,*Respondents.1

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered January 6, 1917, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action for an injunction.

Affirmed.

*McCarthy & Edge,*for appellant.

*John B. White*and *W. C. Meyer,*for respondents.

1

Reported in 172 Pac. 233.

Per Curiam.

The question presented in this case has just been considered and decided in *Cushing v. White, ante*p. 172, 172 Pac. 229. Upon the authority of that ease the judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS
                                 --------------

I, Andrew Reiben, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ATC Healthcare, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;

                  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report; and

                  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

                  (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

Date:  _____, 2005
                                   /s/ ANDREW REIBEN
                                   -----------------
                                   Andrew Reiben
                                   Chief Financial Officer,
                                   Senior Vice President, Finance and Treasurer

                                       51
No. 54407.

#### Abels Wasserberg & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 152698-K (A), etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with theannual report of Non Invasive Monitoring, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending July 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary W. Macleod,,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

Dated: November 2, 2007
(Reap. Dec. 9056)

#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 700697/2; 734650/3.

(Decided January 23, 1958)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise marked “A” and checked SL (Examiner’s Initials) by Examiner S. Leavitt (Examiner’s Name) on the invoices covered by the appeals to reappraisement listed in the attached schedule was freely offered for sale, or exportation to the United States, to all purchasers in the principal markets of Germany in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, at a price equal to the appraised value less the amount added under duress and that such or similar merchandise was not offered for home consumption in Germany at a higher price.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the reappraisement appeals herein may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find tbe export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of tbe merchandise identified on *656the invoices by the items marked “A” and checked SL by examiner S. Leavitt, and that such values were the appraised values, less the amounts, added under duress.

Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise, they are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

No. 8125.

Entry No. 800306, etc.

(Decided June 5, 1952)

*Sharretts, Hillis & Paley (Howard C. Carter*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

JohnsoN, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, that the market value or the price, at the time of exportation to the United States of the earthenware articles covered by the Appeals to Reappraisement enumerated on schedule *“A”*hereto attached and made part hereof, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States, was in each instance the appraised value less the amount added to meet advances made by the Appraiser in similar cases and that there is no foreign value.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that these appeals to reappraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the earthenware articles here involved, and that such value in each instance was the appraised value, less the amount added to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases.

Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 48287.

#### Protests 530932-G, etc., of Olivier Straw Goods Corp. (New York.)

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The testimony of the plaintiff’s witness showed that certain items are the same in all material respects as the hats involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). In accordance therewith certain of the hats imported or withdrawn for consumption prior to the date of the Netherlands Trade Agreement (T. D. 48075) were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5), and those imported or withdrawn for consumption subsequent to the date of said trade agreement were held dutiable at 12)4 percent' under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) as claimed.
#### In the Matter of Dale John BELOCK.

No. 282 Disciplinary Dkt. No. 3

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Oct. 28, 1998.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 28th day of October, 1998, Dale John Belock having been disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Ohio by Order of the Supreme Court of Ohio dated June 10, 1998; the said Dale John Belock having been directed on August 17, 1998, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is

ORDERED that Dale John Belock is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.
NO. SEMS ID DATE AUTHOR RECIPIENT TITLE/DESCRIPTION PAGES

1 88435 3/31/88 U.S. EPA File Administrative Record for the 

Eau Claire Municipal Well 

Field Site - Remedial Action - 

Original (Documents on this 

index are incorporated by 

reference into the Deletion 

Docket )

23

2 88416 12/14/90 U.S. EPA File Administrative Record for the 

Eau Claire Municipal Well 

Field Site - Removal Action - 

Original (Documents on this 

index are incorporated by 

reference into the Deletion 

Docket )

2

3 347970 12/23/09 U.S. EPA File Administrative Record for the 

Eau Claire Municipal Well 

Field Site - Remedial Action - 

Update 1 (Documents on this 

index are incorporated by 

reference into the Deletion 

Docket )

1

4 437158 7/17/12 U.S. EPA File Administrative Record for the 

Eau Claire Municipal Well 

Field Site - Remedial Action - 

Update 2 (Documents on this 

index are incorporated by 

reference into the Deletion 

Docket )

1

5 452431 4/5/2013 Karl, R., U.S. 

EPA

File Final Close Out Report for the 

Eau Claire Municipal Well 

Field Site

94

Eau Claire Municipal Well Field Site

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Remedial Action

Deletion Docket

For

Eau Claire, Chippewa County, Wisconsin

August 7, 2013

SEMS ID: 906397
Eau Claire Municipal Well Field Deletion Docket

Page 2

NO. SEMS ID DATE AUTHOR RECIPIENT TITLE/DESCRIPTION PAGES

6 446563 6/14/13 Stepp, C., 

WDNR

Hedman, S., 

U.S. EPA

Wisconsin Department of 

Natural Resources 

Concurrence for Eau Claire 

Municipal Well Field Proposed 

NPL Deletion

1
Exhibit 10.14
 SUMMARY SHEET OF DIRECTOR FEES AND OFFICER COMPENSATION
 I. Director Compensation
    II. Executive Compensation
 Base Salaries
  Name
    
    Base SalaryCharles L. McNew
    
    $
    224,662Hugh M. Foley
    
    
    139,347Joseph Sciacca
    
    
    151,688Douglas Reece
    
    
    108,363
 Participation in Employee Benefit and Other Arrangements
  
    
    Exercise outstanding options issued pursuant to 1994 Key Employee Stock Option Plan;
    
    Participate in the 2005 Stock Option and Stock Incentive Plan;
    
    Participate in certain group life, health, medical and other non-cash benefits generally
available to all salaried employees;
    
    Employment severance agreements. These agreements provides severance benefits under
certain circumstances and remain in effect so long as we continue to employ the above named
executives.
CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the accompanying quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Futomic
      Industries Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, I certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





|(1) | the
              quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Futomic Industries Inc. for the
              quarter
              ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | the
              information contained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
              quarter ended September 30, 2006, fairly presents in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Futomic
              Industries Inc..
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




By:
            /s/
                Kelly OwenName:
            Kelly
                OwenTitle:
            Principal
                Executive Officer,
              Principal
                Financial Officer and DirectorDate:
            November
                14, 2006
# C_2013147EN.01000801.xml

| 25.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 14 February 2013 — SEK Zollagentur GmbH v Hauptzollamt Gießen

(Case C-75/13)

2013/C 147/13

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SEK Zollagentur GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Gießen

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Are the relevant provisions of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, (1) in particular Article 50 thereof, to be interpreted as meaning that an article left with a person by the customs authority for temporary storage in an approved place is deemed to have been removed from customs supervision if it is declared for an external transit procedure, but it does not in fact accompany the prepared transit papers on the transport planned and is not presented to the customs office at the place of destination? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are the relevant provisions of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, (1) in particular Article 50 thereof, to be interpreted as meaning that an article left with a person by the customs authority for temporary storage in an approved place is deemed to have been removed from customs supervision if it is declared for an external transit procedure, but it does not in fact accompany the prepared transit papers on the transport planned and is not presented to the customs office at the place of destination?

1

| 2. | If the answer to the first question is affirmative: In such circumstances is the person who, as the approved consignor, placed the goods in the transit procedure a customs debtor under the first indent of Article 203(3) of the Customs Code or under the fourth indent of Article 203(3) of the Customs Code? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to the first question is affirmative: In such circumstances is the person who, as the approved consignor, placed the goods in the transit procedure a customs debtor under the first indent of Article 203(3) of the Customs Code or under the fourth indent of Article 203(3) of the Customs Code?

---

(1)  OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1.

1

---