alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 44417.

#### Protests 29727-K, etc., of Ampol, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Stokby*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358) it was held that 10 percent allowance should have been made for the weight of the gelatinous material in question.
# Fo urth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 28, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00182

- CV

Crystal SMITH,

Appellant

v.

Joseph HICKMAN,

Appellee

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI19228

Honorable Solomon Casseb III, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On July 9, 2019, appellee filed a Motion to Refer to Alternative Dispute Resolution and

Stay the Appeal. In an order dated July 24, 2019, we ordered appellant to file a response to

appellee’s motion. On August 20, 2019, appellant filed a response in which appellant objects to

appellee’s motion.

Appellee’s Motion to Refer to Alternative Dispute Resolution is DENIED.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 28th day of August, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Paul D. BRAKE, Jr. Appellant.

No. 73655.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Sept. 29, 1998.

Susan K. Roach, Chesterfield, for appellant.

Angela Dunn, Matthew T. Drake, Asst. Pros. Attys., Franklin County, Union, for respondent.

Before PUDLOWSKI, P.J., and CRANDALL and AHRENS, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Paul D. Brake, Jr. (Defendant) appeals from the judgment and conviction for the misdemeanor offense of third degree assault in violation of section 565.070, RSMo 1994, in this bench-tried case.

*278We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. Further, there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable trier of fact might find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. *State v. Grim,*854 S.W.2d 403, 405 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
**Exhibit
32.2**
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  
 In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Capital Lease Funding, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shawn
P. Seale, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  (1)
    the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 /s/ SHAWN P. SEALEShawn P. SealeSenior Vice President,
      Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerDate: March 30,
2005
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Capital Lease Funding, Inc. and will be
retained by Capital Lease Funding, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 39214.

#### Petition 5604-R of Griggs, Cooper & Co. (Pembina).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was held that the burden is on the petitioners to prove by satisfactory evidence that there was no intention to defraud the revenue. Statements without corroborating facts or circumstances were held insufficient to prove intention. *Finsilver*v. *United States*(13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 332, T. D. 41250) cited. On the record presented the petition was denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 25, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-51250 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus VICTOR MANUEL MORENO-PARRILLA, also known as Victor A. Moreno, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-02-CR-1283-ALL-DB

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Victor Manuel Moreno-Parrilla appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Moreno complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. He argues that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. Moreno thus contends that his sentence should not exceed the two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).No. 02-51250 -2-
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Moreno acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DSCC commander to honor fallen at Bexley Memorial Day event

DLA Land and Maritime Public Affairs

Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime Commander U.S. Navy Rear Adm. Kristen Fabry will be the keynote speaker for the City of Bexley’s annual Memorial Day service May 30. Bexley is a neighboring community of the Defense Supply Center Columbus military installation. The ceremony begins at 11 a.m. at Drexel Circle.

Other ceremony participants will include Bexley Mayor Ben Kessler and town officials.

Drexel Circle, at the intersection of Drexel Avenue and Broad Street, is home to the town’s World War II Memorial erected in 1945 and etched with the names of Bexley’s war veterans. Past observances have featured wreath-layings at the memorial, local musicians and the Bexley Police Honor Guard.

The ceremony is open to the public. Lawn chairs or blankets are encouraged for seating.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Memorial DayBexleyOhioDLA Land and MaritimeDefense Supply Center ColumbusMemorial Day CeremonyDLA Land and Maritime Commander US Navy Rear Adm Kristen FabryCommand L&M
<PAGE>




                                                                  Exhibit 28.4
                     CHASE MANHATTAN AUTO OWNER TRUST 1998-B
                           ANNUAL ISSUER'S CERTIFICATE
                                       of
                            COMPLIANCE WITH INDENTURE

      The undersigned certifies that he is an Authorized Officer of Wilmington
Trust Company, as Owner Trustee for Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 1998-B and
that he is duly authorized to execute and deliver this certificate on behalf of
the Issuer in connection with Section 3.9 of the Indenture between the Issuer
and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, dated as
of April 1, 1998 (the "Indenture") and the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated
as of April 1, 1998 (the "Agreement"), among Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National
Association, as Servicer, Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association and The
Chase Manhattan Bank, as Sellers, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner
Trustee. All capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the
respective meanings specified in the Indenture and the Agreement.

      The undersigned further certifies that a review of the activities of the
Issuer for the preceding calendar year has been made under his supervision and,
to the best of his knowledge, the Issuer has fulfilled its obligations under the
Indenture for the preceding calendar year.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereto my signature as of this 15th day
of March, 2000.

                        CHASE MANHATTAN AUTO OWNER TRUST 1998-B
                        BY: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, as Owner Trustee



                                /s/ Denise Geran
                                -----------------------------------------
                                Name: Denise Geran
                                Title: Financial Services Officer

Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association, as Servicer, hereby requests
that Wilmington Trust Company execute the above Issuer's Certificate and deliver
it to Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Indenture Trustee.

                                    CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA,
                                    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer


                                /s/ Jeffrey D. Hammer
                                ------------------------------------
                                Jeffrey D. Hammer
                                Vice President
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Joseph Sciacca, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Halifax Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) (Intentionally omitted);c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sforth fiscal quarter in the case of any annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting     Date: June 21, 2006 /s/ Joseph Sciacca     Joseph Sciacca    Chief Financial Officer
#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7708.

Invoice dated London, England, January 8, 1941,

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 12, 1941.

Entry No. 88988.

*465(Decided June 14, 1949)

*John B. Bafter*for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General *(Charles J. Miville,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues relating to this appeal for reappraisement are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc.,*32 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 187, C. A. D. 305, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

It has been further agreed between the parties that there is no foreign value, export value, or United States value, as those values are defined in section 402 (c), (d), and (e), respectively, of the Tariff Act of 1930, for the importation in question.

Upon the agreed facts, I find that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of said act, is the proper basis for determining the value of the merchandise covered by this appeal, and that such value is 76 shillings plus 10 percent, plus 8 percent, per dozen pairs, plus the cost of boxes, cases, and packing, as invoiced.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
exhibit 4.1 - Stock Cert





Exhibit 4.1


	Number  	  	Shares  
	  
	PARK AND SELL CORP. 
	INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF 
	NEVADA 100,000,000 SHARES COMMON STOCK AUTHORIZED, 
	$0.00001 PAR VALUE 
	  
	  	  	CUSIP  
	  	  	SEE REVERSE  
	  	  	FOR  
	This  	  	CERTAIN  
	certifies  	  	DEFINITIONS  
	that  	  	  
	is the owner of  	  	  
	  
	  
	FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE 
	SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF 
	  
	  
	PARK AND SELL CORP. 
	transferable on the books of the corporation in person or by duly 
	authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly 
	endorsed. This certificate and the shares represented hereby 
	are subject to the laws of the State of Nevada, and to the 
	Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Corporation, 
	as now or hereafter amended. This certificate is not valid 
	unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent. WITNESS 
	the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the signature 
	of its duly authorized officers 
	  
	  
	  
	  
	PRESIDENT  	[SEAL]  	SECRETARY
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 100 (Thursday, May 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 29142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9978]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER07-640-000]


Citadel Energy Investments Ltd.; Notice of Issuance of Order

May 18, 2007.
    Citadel Energy Investments Ltd. (CEI), filed a request for 
authorization to engage in the resale of financially-settled financial 
transmission rights with an accompanying rate schedule. CEI also 
requested waivers of various Commission regulations. In particular, CEI 
requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR part 
34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability 
by CEI.
    On May 17, 2007, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Tariffs and Market Development--West, granted the requests 
for blanket approval under part 34 (Director's Order). The Director's 
Order also stated that the Commission would publish a separate notice 
in the Federal Register establishing a period of time for the filing of 
protests. Accordingly, any person desiring to be heard concerning the 
blanket approvals of issuances of securities or assumptions of 
liability by CEI should file a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure. 18 CFR 385.211, 385.214 (2004).
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests is 
June 18, 2007.
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition to such blanket 
approvals by the deadline above, CEI is authorized to issue securities 
and assume obligations or liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, 
or otherwise in respect of any security of another person; provided 
that such issuance or assumption is for some lawful object within the 
corporate purposes of CEI, compatible with the public interest, and is 
reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approvals of CEI's issuance of securities or assumptions of 
liability.
    Copies of the full text of the Director's Order are available from 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Commission's 
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, using the eLibrary link. Enter the 
docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number 
filed to access the document. Comments, protests, and interventions may 
be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages 
electronic filings.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-9978 Filed 5-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

VIDEO INFORMATION

** Details

** Share

# Logistics on Location: DLA Land and Maritime supports USS Nitze

DLA Land and Maritime Public Affairs

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
01:00VIDEO  | 01:00 |Logistics On Location: DLA Supports USS Nitze

 

The supply team on the Navy destroyer USS Nitze works closely with Defense Logistics Agency Maritime Norfolk to get the repair parts it needs to complete its mission while at sea. DLA also resupplies the kitchens with food along with other materiel needed to meet mission requirements around the globe. The USS Nitze (DDG-94) is the 16th Flight IIA Arleigh Burke class guided missile destroyer and is named after Paul H. Nitze. Nitze, who served as Secretary of the Navy under President Lyndon B. Johnson and as chief arms control adviser in the administration of President Ronald Reagan.  Watch this video to learn more about how DLA does its part to keep the supply chain open and get the USS Nitze the supplies they need to be mission ready.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Warfighter Always L&MUSS Nitze