40868 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 146 / Wednesday, July 30, 1997 / Notices

absent a determination by the

Commission, the presiding officer or the

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board that

the petition and/or request should be

granted based upon a balancing of the

factors specified in 10 CFR

2.714(a)(1)(i)-(v) and 2.714(d).

Entergy Operations Inc., Docket No. 50-

382, Waterford Steam Electric Station,

Unit 3, St. Charles Parish, Louisiana

Date of amendment request: July 10,

1997

Brief description of amendment: The

amendment changes the Appendix A

Technical Specifications by deleting the

requirements of Surveillance

Requirements (SR) 4.8.1.1.2.h.2 for the

diesel fuel oil system. This change will

result in testing of the diesel fuel oil

system in accordance with ASME Code

Section XI requirements.

Date of issuance: July 11, 1997

Effective date: July 11, 1997, with full

implementation within 30 days.

Amendment No: 132

Facility Operating License No. NPF38: Amendment revises the Technical

Specifications. Public comments

requested as to proposed no significant

hazards consideration: No. The

Commission’s related evaluation of the

amendment, finding of emergency

circumstances, and final determination

of no significant hazards consideration

are contained in a Safety Evaluation

dated July 11, 1997.

Attorney for licensee: N.S. Reynolds,

Esquire, Winston & Strawn, 1400 L

Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005-

3502

Local Public Document Room

location: University of New Orleans

Library, Louisiana Collection, Lakefront,

New Orleans, LA 70122

NRC Acting Project Director: James

Clifford, Acting

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day

of July 1997.

For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Jack W. Roe,

Director, Division of Reactor Projects III/IV,

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

[Doc. 97–19910 Filed 7–29–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–F

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION

[Docket No. A97–25, Order No. 1187]

In the Matter of: Webster Crossing,

New York 14584, (Eleanor Wong, et al.,

Petitioners); Notice and Order

Accepting Appeal and Establishing

Procedural Schedule UNDER 39 U.S.C.

§ 404(b)(5)

Issued July 24, 1997.

Docket Number: A97–25.

Name of Affected Post Office: Webster

Crossing, New York 14584.

Name(s) of Petitioner(s): Eleanor

Wong, et al.

Type of Determination: Closing.

Date of Filing of Appeal Papers: July

18, 1997.

Categories of Issues Apparently

Raised:

1. Effect on the community [39 U.S.C.

404(b)(2)(A)].

2. Effect on postal services [39 U.S.C.

404(b)(2)(C)].

After the Postal Service files the

administrative record and the

Commission reviews it, the Commission

may find that there are more legal issues

than those set forth above. Or, the

Commission may find that the Postal

Service’s determination disposes of one

or more of those issues.

The Postal Reorganization Act

requires that the Commission issue its

decision within 120 days from the date

this appeal was filed (39 U.S.C.

404(b)(5)). In the interest of expedition,

in light of the 120-day decision

schedule, the Commission may request

the Postal Service to submit memoranda

of law on any appropriate issue. If

requested, such memoranda will be due

20 days from the issuance of the request

and the Postal Service shall serve a copy

of its memoranda on the petitioners.

The Postal Service may incorporate by

reference in its briefs or motions, any

arguments presented in memoranda it

previously filed in this docket. If

necessary, the Commission also may ask

petitioners or the Postal Service for

more information. The Commission

orders:

(a) The Postal Service shall file the

record in this appeal by August 1, 1997.

(b) The Secretary of the Postal Rate

Commission shall publish this Notice

and Order and Procedural Schedule in

the Federal Register.

By the Commission.

Cyril J. Pittack,

Acting Secretary.

Appendix

July 18, 1997—Filing of Appeal letter.

July 24, 1997—Commission Notice and Order

of Filing of Appeal.

August 12, 1997—Last day of filing of

petitions to intervene [see 39 CFR

3001.111(b)].

August 22, 1997—Petitioners’ Participant

Statement or Initial Brief [see 39 CFR

3001.115 (a) and (b)].

September 11, 1997—Postal Service’s

Answering Brief [see 39 CFR 3001.115(c)].

September 26, 1997—Petitioners’ Reply Brief

should Petitioner choose to file one [see 39

CFR 3001.115(d)].

October 3, 1997—Deadline for motions by

any party requesting oral argument. The

Commission will schedule oral argument

only when it is a necessary addition to the

written filings [see 39 CFR 3001.116].

November 15, 1997—Expiration of the

Commission’s 120-day decisional schedule

[see 39 U.S.C. 404(b)(5)].

[FR Doc. 97–20014 Filed 7–29–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

[Rel. No. IC–22762; File No. 812–10676]

Oppenheimer & Co., L.P., et al.

July 24, 1997.

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange

Commission (‘‘SEC’’).

ACTION: Notice of application for

exemption under the Investment

Company Act of 1940 (‘‘Act’’).

Applicants: Oppenheimer & Co., L.P.

(‘‘Opco’’), Oppenheimer Group, Inc.

(‘‘Opgroup’’), Oppenheimer Financial

Corp. (‘‘Opfin’’) (collectively, the

‘‘Oppenheimer Applicants’’), The

Emerging Markets Income Fund Inc.

(‘‘Emerging Market’’), The Emerging

Markets Income Fund II Inc. (‘‘Emerging

Market II’’), The Emerging Markets

Floating Rate Fund Inc. (‘‘Emerging

floating Rate’’), Global Partners Income

Fund Inc. (‘‘Global Partners’’),

Municipal Partners Fund Inc.

(‘‘Municipal Partners’’), Municipal

Partners Fund II Inc. (‘‘Municipal

Partners II’’), The Enterprise Group of

Funds, Inc. (‘‘Enterprise Fund’’),

Enterprise Accumulation Trust

(‘‘Enterprise Trust’’), WNL Series Trust

(‘‘WNL’’), Endeavor Series Trust

(‘‘Endeavor’’), Penn Series Funds, Inc.

(‘‘Penn Fund’’), The Preferred Group of

Mutual Funds (‘‘Preferred’’), Select

Advisors Portfolios (‘‘Select Portfolios’’),

Select Advisors Variable Insurance

Trust (‘‘Select Trust’’), Select Advisors

Trust A (‘‘Select A’’), and Select

Advisors Trust C (‘‘Select C’’)

(collectively, the ‘‘Companies’’).

Relevant Act Sections: Order

requested under section 6(c) for an

exemption from section 15(f)(1)(A).

Summary of Application: Applicants

request an exemption from section

15(f)(1)(A) in connection with the

proposed change in control of

Oppenheimer Capital (‘‘Opcapital’’),

Opcap Advisors (‘‘Opcap’’), and

Advantage Advisers, Inc. (‘‘Advantage,’’

collectively with Opcapital and Opcap,

the ‘‘Advisers’’), each of which acts as

investment adviser or subadviser to one

or more of the Companies. Without the

requested exemption, the Companies

would have to reconstitute their boards

of directors (‘‘Boards’’) to meet the 75