alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE

THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE (this "Amendment") is dated for
reference purposes only as of May 18, 1999, by and between TRANSAMERICA
OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation
("Landlord"), and MAXICARE HEALTH PLANS, INC., a Delaware corporation
("Tenant").


RECITALS

A.	Landlord and Tenant entered into that certain Lease dated for
reference purposes only as of June 1, 1994, as amended by a First
Amendment to Lease dated for reference purposes only as of November
1996 and a Second Amendment to Lease dated for reference purposes only
as of January 4, 1999 (collectively, the "Lease"), with respect to
premises located at and commonly known as the entire 8' and 9t' floors
in the Broadway Building located at 1149 South Broadway Street, Los
Angeles, California (hereinafter the "Premises" and the "Building",
respectively); and

B.	On April 16, 1999 Landlord notified Tenant pursuant to Article
2.01 D. and Exhibit "I" of the Lease that the seventh (T) floor of the
Building was available to lease. In response, Tenant notified Landlord on
April 22, 1999 that it was not interested in exercising its right to
lease the seventh (T) floor of the Building.

C.	The Landlord and Tenant now desire to further amend the Lease
as provided herein below.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Landlord and Tenant for good and valuable
consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, amend the
Lease as follows:

AGREEMENT

1 . 	   The foregoing Recitals are true and correct and incorporated
herein by this reference.

2.	All capitalized terms not specifically defined herein shall
have the meanings set forth in the Lease.

3.	This Amendment shall be read and construed with the Lease, and
all terms, covenants and conditions set forth in the Lease, except as
specifically amended herein, shall be and remain in full force and
effect.

<PAGE>
4.	Paragraph 1. of Exhibit "F" of the Lease entitled Grant of
Option is amended to provide that Tenant's written notice period to
exercise Tenant's first (Is') option to renew the Lease as to all of the
Premises is hereby extended from May 31, 1999 to and including July 31,
1999.


		5.	The parties hereto represent and warrant to the other that they
are authorized and empowered to enter into this Amendment and each of the
individuals executing this Amendment on behalf of the respective party
entities do hereby expressly warrant and represent to the other that they
are duly authorized to execute this Amendment on behalf of said entities
and to bind said entities to the terms of this Amendment.

6.	In the event of any conflict between the terms, provisions and
covenants of the Lease and this Amendment, the terms, provisions and
covenants of this Amendment shall supercede and govern the actions of the
parties hereto.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as of the day
and year first above written.

"LANDLORD"

TRANSAMERICA OCCIDENTAL LIFE
 INSURANCE COMPANY INC., a California
Corporation


By:

Name:


Its:

"TENANT"

MAXICARE HEALTH PLANS, INC., a
Delaware corporation

By:

Name:

Its:
Dismissal and Opinion Filed March 2, 2023 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-01075-CV
MERCURY OPERATING, LLC AND STEFAN T. TOTH, Appellants V. PETROROCK MINERAL HOLD INGS, LLC, Appellee
On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-04656

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Miskel Opinion by Justice Miskel Before the Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal. We grant the
motion and dismiss the appeal. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

221075F.P05 /Emil y Miskel / EMILY MISKEL JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

MERCURY OPERATING, LLC AND STEFAN T. TOTH, Appellants

No. 05-22-01075-CV V.

PETROROCK MINERAL HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas. Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-04656. Opinion delivered by Justice Miskel. Justices Molberg and Pedersen, III participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.
It is ORDERED that appellee PETROR OCK MINERAL HOLDINGS, LLC recover its costs of this appeal from appellants MERCURY OPERATING, LLC AND STEFAN T. TOTH.
Judgment entered this 2nd day of March 2023.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 42



### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 10/09 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 09 Oct 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL
EXHIBIT
32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002







In connection
with the Quarterly Report of nFinanSe Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended July 3, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raymond P. Springer, in my capacity as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Raymond P.
      SpringerDate:  August
      16, 2010
            Raymond
      P. Springer
              Secretary
      and Chief Financial Officer
No. 96-6077.

#### Mitchell *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Broadwind Energy, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Matthew J. Gadow, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                 The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)                                 The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Matthew J. Gadow      |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Matthew  J. Gadow          |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer   |   |
|                       |   |
| Date:  March 16, 2009 |   |

 

----
# C_2014194EN.01000802.xml

| 24.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 April 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No4 de Palma de Mallorca — Spain) — Barclays Bank SA v Sara Sánchez García, Alejandro Chacón Barrera

o

(Case C-280/13) (1)

1

((Request for a preliminary ruling - Directive 93/13/EEC - Thirteenth recital in the preamble - Article 1(2) - Consumer contracts - Mortgage loan agreement - Mortgage enforcement proceedings - National statutory and regulatory provisions - Contractual balance))

2014/C 194/09

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia No4 de Palma de Mallorca

o

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Barclays Bank SA

Applicant:

Defendant: Sara Sánchez García, Alejandro Chacón Barrera

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Palma de Mallorca — Interpretation of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29) — Consumer protection in relation to mortgage loans — Balance in the parties’ contractual rights and obligations — Principle of consumer protection — National civil procedure rules applicable to the procedure for enforcing a mortgage

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts and the principles of EU law relating to consumer protection and a balance in the parties’ rights and obligations must be interpreted as meaning that statutory and regulatory provisions of a Member State, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, are excluded from their scope, when there is no contractual term altering the effect or ambit of those provisions.

---

(1)  OJ C 226, 3.8.2013.

1

---
The final version of the proposed plan, technical support document and all supporting

material can be found on the www.regulations.gov web site.

EPA will be accepting comments on the proposed plan until July 2, 2012. Please identify

your comments with the following docket ID : EPA

- R09

- OAR

- 2012

- 0345

Federal Rulemaking Portal:

http://www.regulations.gov

follow the online instructions for submitting comments

E

- mail writt en comments to:

nudd.gregory@epa.gov

Do not submit information that you consider to be Confidential Business Information or

otherwise protected through http:// www.regulations.gov or e

- mail.

Mail or hand

- deliver written comments to 1 :

Gregory Nudd (AIR

- 2 )

U.S. EPA, Region 9

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

- 3901

Submit oral and/ or written comments and data at EPA’s Public Hearing:

June 1, 2012

5:30

- 7:30 p.m.

Waiakea High School in the Cafeteria

155 W. Kawili St.

Hilo, Hawaii 96720

1 Hand and courier deliveries are only accepted Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m.

- 4:30 p.m.,

excluding Federal holidays. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed

information. 

## HOW	DO	I	COMMENT	ON THE	PROPOSAL?

STATE	OF	HAWAII

REGIONAL	HAZE

PROPOSED FEDERAL	IMPLEMENTATI ON	PLAN
Placeholder: confidential business information item 

Hy-Yield Bromine letter to EPA regarding transfer of CSAs 

For more information please contact Jeremy Arling by phone at 202-343-9055 or by 

email at arling.jeremy@epa.gov
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 145 (Tuesday, July 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19824]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #2968]


State of Minnesota

    Ramsey County and the contiguous Counties of Anoka, Dakota, 
Hennepin, and Washington in the State of Minnesota constitute a 
disaster area as a result of damages caused by severe storms, flash 
flooding, and sewer backup which occurred on July 1-17, 1997. 
Applications for loans for physical damages may be filed until the 
close of business on September 18, 1997 and for economic injury until 
the close of business on April 20, 1998 at the address listed below or 
other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, 
Disaster Area 2 Office, One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 
30308.
    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               percent  
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:                                                    
Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere.................        8.000
Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............        4.000
Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere.................        8.000
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit                  
 Available Elsewhere.......................................        4.000
Others (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit                 
 Available Elsewhere.......................................        7.250
For Economic Injury:                                                    
Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without                  
 Credit Available Elsewhere................................        4.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 296806 
and for economic injury the number is 953700.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: July 18, 1997.
Aida Alvarez,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-19824 Filed 7-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and
StockholdersInvestors Title CompanyChapel Hill, North Carolina

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statement No. 333-33903 of Investors Title Company
(the Company) and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 6, 2009,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Investors Title
Company, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
which reports appear in Investors Title Companys 2008 Annual Report on Form
10-K.

Our audits of the consolidated
financial statements referred to in our aforementioned report also included the
financial statement schedules of the Company, listed in item 15. These financial
statement schedules are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion,
such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all
material respects, the information set forth herein.

|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|Dixon Hughes PLLCHigh
      Point, North CarolinaMarch 6, 2009

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

         I, Mark A. Payne, President and Chief Financial Officer of Redline
Performance Products, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, that to my
knowledge:

                  (1)      the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
                           fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed
                           with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
                           "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
                           Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                           of 1934; and

                  (2)      information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                           in all material respects, the financial condition and
                           results of operations of the Company.

Date:  November 14, 2003

                                         /s/ Mark A. Payne
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Mark A. Payne
                                         President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or
as separate disclosure documents. A signed original of this written statement
has been provided to Redline Performance Products, Inc. and will be retained by
Redline Performance Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

891292.6
Case No. 10,071.

#### NEALE v. PEYTON.

[2 Cranch. C. C. 313.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

May Term, 1822.

Notes — Indorsement — Demand on Maker — When to be Made — Insolvency op Maker.

Demand of payment on the 5th of July, of a note due on the lst — 4th of July, is too late to charge the indorser, and the insolvency of the maker will not excuse the delay.

Assumpsit against the indorser of a promissory note. The note was put into the Bank of Potomac for collection, and fell due on the lst-4th of July. The note was not given out and no demand of payment was made on the maker of the note until the 5th of July. The maker was insolvent.

THE COURT

(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent,)

said it was too late, and that the insolvency of the maker did not excuse the delay.
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Oil & Gas, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A2 for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
10-QSB/A2"), I, Andrew P. Calerich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-QSB/A2 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB/A2 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 6, 2004

/s/ Andrew P. Calerich
Andrew P. Calerich
Chief Financial Officer
No. 6096.

#### ITEM COMPANY, LIMITED, vs. M. AUGUSTIN.

Appeal from the First City Court of New Orleans, Division “A,” No. 61,790. Hon. Wynne Rogers, Judge.

Robert H. Marr, for plaintiff and appellee.

Lyle Saxon, for defendant and appellant.

His Honor, CHARLES F. CLAIBORNE,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

We are of the opinion that the evidence in this ease establishes beyond a doubt that the relation of vendor *266and vendee existed between the plaintiff herein, the Item Company, and the carriers of its papers, and not that of employer and employee. The testimony of Mr. Thomson is positive on that point and is not contradicted. The course of dealings of the parties corroborated him. The carriers gave written requests for the number of papers required- by each daily, and these were delivered to them at an agreed price of seven for ten cents, subject to a discount of half a cent for prompt payment. The carriers were to pay for the papers they received each week on the ensuing Wednesday. When payments were made to the Item Company by the carriers, they did not make a return of the number of papers sold by them nor of the names of the purchasers or subscribers nor of the amounts collected from them. They paid the price of all papers requested by them and delivered to them -during the previous week, whether they sold the papers or not, and "whether they had collected from their customers or not. Nor were they permitted to return to the Item any unsold papers, or to receive credit for the failure of any of their customers to pay them.

The most they expected or received was an indulgence of time to permit them to collect from the delinquents. When the carriers ceased to take papers on Wednesday, January 14th, they had been charged with the papers received by them for the week immediately preceding, and for which they should have made payment on the 14th. Tet on that day no carrier made any payment to the Item Company, nor have they made any since. The value of those papers is the object of the present suits. The action of the carriers on that -day, and since, furnishes their own and the best interpretation of their relations to the Item Company. No doubt they believed that the money they owed for those papers was only an ordinary *267debt for papers sold and delivered, and which each one had a reason satisfactory to himself not to pay. If they had been the employees of the Item Company selling papers and collecting for its account, their failure to make returns on that day of the money collected by them for the price of those papers, and their keeping the money, would have amounted to an embezzlement. We prefer to accept the construction-put upon their contract by the carriers themselves, and to conclude that they are the debtors to the Item for the price of papers sold to them, and not employees who have failed to account for money collected by them.

Opinion and decree, May 18th, 1914.

We are supported in our conclusion 'by the judgment of the lower Court which was in favor of plaintiff and it is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.
# Euroopa Liidu C 48/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0898
  doi:10.3000/19770898.C_2013.048.est |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 48 |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 56. köide19. veebruar 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0898

doi:10.3000/19770898.C_2013.048.est

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 48

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

56. köide19. veebruar 2013

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Teated |
| | HALDUSMENETLUSED |
| | Euroopa Parlament |
| 2013/C 048/01 | Otsus | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

V   Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

Euroopa Parlament

2013/C 048/01

Otsus

1

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

V Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

Euroopa Parlament

| 19.2.2013 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | C 48/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2013

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

C 48/1

---

OTSUS

2013/C 48/01

EUROOPA PARLAMENDI PEASEKRETÄR,

võttes arvesse nõukogu määrust (EMÜ, Euratom, ESTÜ) nr 259/68, mida on muudetud määrusega (EÜ, Euratom) nr 723/2004 ning viimati muudetud Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu 24. novembri 2010. aasta määrusega (EL, Euratom) nr 1080/2010 (millega muudetakse Euroopa ühenduste ametnike personalieeskirju ja Euroopa ühenduste muude teenistujate teenistustingimusi), eelkõige personalieeskirjade artiklit 30,

võttes arvesse juhatuse 3. mai 2004. aasta otsust volituste andmise kohta ametisse nimetavale asutusele või ametiisikule ning teenistuslepinguid sõlmima volitatud ametiisikule, mida juhatus muutis viimati 4. mail 2009. aastal,

võttes arvesse, et 31. detsembril 2012. aastal kaotavad kehtivuse järgmised Euroopa Parlamendi reservnimekirjad:

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006, AST/5/08, PE/69/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S ja PE/119/S,

võttes arvesse ühiskomitee 21. novembri 2012. aasta koosolekul esitatud arvamust,

OTSUSTAB

Artikkel 1

Reservnimekirjade

AD/4/08, PE/99/S, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/109/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, AST/5/08, PE/96/S, PE/110/S ja PE/119/S

kehtivusaega pikendatakse 31. detsembrini 2013.

Artikkel 2

Reservnimekirjade

PE/96/A, PE/97/A, A/94, A/95, A/96, C/348, AST/1/05, AST/1/06 ja PE/69/S

kehtivusaega ei pikendata.

Luxembourg, 20. detsember 2012

Klaus WELLE

peasekretär

---